Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 21, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-15-01202-CR No. 05-15-01203-CR SENRICK WILKERSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Crimin al District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-01183-J, F10-01184-J 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Senrick Wilkerson was convicted of sexual pe rformance by a child a nd sexual assault of a child. The convictions were affirmed on direct appeal, as were the appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction DNA test ing related to the convictions. Wilkerson v. State , Nos. 05-11-00061–00062-CR, 2012 WL 2877623 (Tex. App.––D allas July 16, 2012, pet. ref’d) (convictions); Wilkerson v. State , Nos. 05-14-00007–00008-CR, 2015 WL 139387 2015 WL 139387 (Tex. App.––Dallas Jan. 12, 2015, no pet.) (DNA). The Court now has before it appellant’s “motion for appeal” to which is attached a copy of a “motion to enter nunc pro tunc order” to correct inaccuracies in the judgments. Appellant asserts he filed the motion on September 21, 2015. Appellant complains in the le tter accompanying his not ice of appeal that the trial court does not respond to the motions he files.–2– We note that the notice of appeal and th e motion for nunc pro tunc judgment do not contain the file-stamp of the Dallas County Dist rict Clerk’s Office. We received correspondence from the Dallas County District Cl erk stating that appellant did not file the documents with that office. If a notice of appeal is filed with this Court, the date on which it is received will be recorded and the notice will be se nt to the trial court clerk. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(c)(1). Rule 25.2(c)(1), however, does not apply to appellan t’s motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. That motion must be filed with the trial court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 23.1. Appellant may not file a motion to correct the trial court’s judgment in this Court, nor may he use this Court as an alternative filing office for documents directed to the trial court. Because appellant’s notice of appeal attacks no judgment or order over which we have jurisdiction, we dism iss the appeals.

Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 151202F.U05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
SENRICK WILKERSON, Appellant
No. 05-15-01202-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10-01183-J. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Myers and Br own participating. Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered October 21, 2015.–4– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
SENRICK WILKERSON, Appellant No. 05-15-01203-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10-01184-J. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Myers and Br own participating. Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered October 21, 2015.