alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35 (c)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884.2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 24, 2007

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for MASTR Asset Backed Securities Trust
2006-AM1

Per Section 3.20 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 2/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Trust Administrator), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof;

(i) A review of the activities of the party during the preceding calendar year
and of performance under this Agreement has been made under such officers'
supervision.

(ii) To the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, the party
has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
respects throughout such year, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any
such obligation in any material respect, specifying each such failure known to
such officer and the nature and status of cure provisions thereof.

(iii) Notwithstanding anything herein to contrary (and noting that, to the
extent of any inconsistency, any and all other statements, certifications or
assertions herein are subject to the following): instances of noncompliance
related to the subject transaction for the applicable reporting period are
identified on Schedule A hereto.



Certified By:
/s/ Barry Akers
Barry Akers
Vice President



Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary


(page)


Schedule A

Reporting Errors

During the reporting period, one or more of the monthly investor reports
contained certain types of errors in regard to the calculation and or the
reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets. To the best of the signing
officer's knowledge, each such error, which may or may not have been material,
has been identified and remedied and any related corrective action has been
disclosed in a report previously filed with the SEC in respect of the reporting
period.
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of Big Cat Energy Corporation(the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A1 for the period end of October 31,
2008as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Richard G. Stifel,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated
this 4th day of
May, 2009.








RICK
STIFEL


Rick
Stifel


Principal
Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 99-11180 Summary Calendar

_________________

UDO BIRNBAUM,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD RAY; ET AL., Defendants,

RICHARD RAY; TOMMY W. WALLACE; JAMES B. ZIMMERMAN; RICHARD DAVIS; PAT MCDOWELL, Judge; LESLIE P. DIXON; BETTY DAVIS; WILLIAM JONES; BECKY K. MALONE,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:99-CV-696-R)

_________________________________________________________________

July 28, 2000

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Udo Birnbaum challenges, pro se , the dismissal, for failure to

state a claim under F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 12(b)(6), of his Racketeer

Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) complaint .- 2 -

Birnbaum’s R ICO action arises out of a state-court action

brought against him by defendant William Jones. Birnbaum’s action

is an attempt to attack collaterally the validity of an adverse

state-court judgment. Federal courts lack jurisdiction to engage

in appellate review of state-court determinations. D istri ct of

Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman

, 460 U.S. 462, 476, 482

(1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
, 263 U.S. 413, 415 (1923);

Liedtke v. State Bar of Texas , 18 F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir. 1994).

“When issues raised in a federal court are inextricably intertwined

with a state judgment and the court is in essence being called upon

to review the state-court decision, the court lacks subject matter

jurisdiction”. D avis v. Bayless

, 70 F.3d 367, 375 (5th Cir.

1995)(internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

Because Birnbaum’s claims arise solely from the sta te-court

lit igation and are “inextricably intertwined” with the state

court’s judgment, the district court judgment is

AFFIRMED.
# **Exhibit32.1**

# **CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George M.L. LaBranche, IV,Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.             the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.             the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, andfor, the period covered by the Report.
| Date: August 9, 2006 | By: /s/ George M. L. LaBranche, IV |                                             |
|----------------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Name:                              | George M.L. LaBranche, IV                        |   |
|                 | Title:                             | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer  and President |   |
|                      |                                    |                                                  |  |  |

 

 

**The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be retained by LaBranche & CoInc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.**

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"AUGUST 2020 ACTIVITY REPORT","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"dPOKaHGmnQ\"><a href=\"\/august-2020-activity-report\/\">AUGUST 2020 ACTIVITY REPORT<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/august-2020-activity-report\/embed\/#?secret=dPOKaHGmnQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“AUGUST 2020 ACTIVITY REPORT” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"dPOKaHGmnQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
# Cruise Notices Archives - Federal Maritime Commission

- Notice to Passengers Regarding American Queen Voyages Posted&#160;February 22, 2024 The Federal Maritime Commission has been informed that American Queen Voyages has shut down, cancelled all future voyages, and has filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Consumers who have purchased travel on American Queen Voyages should visit the “Customer Claims Portal” webpage established [&#8230;]The post Notice to Passengers Regarding American Queen Voyages appeared first on Federal Maritime Commission.
- Notice to Passengers Regarding Vantage Travel Services, Inc. The Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) is aware that Vantage Travel Services, Inc. (Vantage) has filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The bankruptcy petition has been assigned Case No. 23-11060 and is  currently pending in the United States  Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts. Consumers should consult the [&#8230;]The post Notice to Passengers Regarding Vantage Travel Services, Inc. appeared first on Federal Maritime Commission.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 13, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00714

- CV

ESTATE OF JOANNE COOKSEY FRIEND, DECEASED,

From the County Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6904

- 16 Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee’s brief was originally due Apr il 1, 2019; however, the court has granted extensions of time until May 15 to file the brief. Appellee has filed a motion for a further fifteen

- day extension

of time.

We grant the motion and order appellee’s brief due May 30, 2019

. The court does not

o rdinarily grant extensions of more than sixty days beyond the original due date. Counsel is therefore advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion, filed before the brief is due, that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstan ces justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court

does n ot generally consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on

this 13th day of May, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Chairman Cordero Participated in the Finished Vehicle Logistics North America Conference","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sPXZLj3Q34\"><a href=\"\/chairman-cordero-participated-in-the-finished-vehicle-logistics-north-america-conference\/\">Chairman Cordero Participated in the Finished Vehicle Logistics North America Conference<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/chairman-cordero-participated-in-the-finished-vehicle-logistics-north-america-conference\/embed\/#?secret=sPXZLj3Q34\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Chairman Cordero Participated in the Finished Vehicle Logistics North America Conference” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"sPXZLj3Q34\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIE JAMES BROWN JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 216 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando GONZALES-VERGARA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10143.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 14, 2011.

Filed March 24, 2011.

Joshua Hill, Jr., Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Warrington Samuel Parker, III, Counsel, Orrick Herrington *&*Sutcliffe, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: WALLACE, NOONAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Fernando Gonzales-Vergara (“Gonzales”) appeals from his jury conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Gonzales argues first that the district court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal challenging the sufficiency of the evidence of his August 12, 2003 removal. This court reviews de novo the district court’s denial of a motion for acquittal based on insufficiency of the evidence. *United States v. Gonzalez,*528 F.3d 1207, 1211 (9th Cir.2008). We affirm the district court’s ruling because, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found that Gonzales was deported on August 12, 2003 beyond a reasonable doubt. *See id.*

We reject Gonzales’ claim that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel because he cannot show prejudice. *762*See Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

We review Gonzales’ remaining claims for plain error. *See United States v. Marcus,*- u.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2159, 2164, 176 L.Ed.2d 1012 (2010). Even assuming, without deciding, that error occurred, Gonzales cannot establish that his substantial rights were affected because there is no reasonable probability that the error affected the outcome of the trial. *See id.*The evidence of Gonzales’ 2003 removal was sufficiently compelling that he would have been convicted in spite of any errors.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 3.3

                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
              ASSOCIATED BUSINESS & COMMERCE INSURANCE CORPORATION


     Pursuant to the provisions of Section 607.0602(4) of the Florida Business
Corporation Act, the undersigned, Associated Business & Commerce Insurance
Corporation, a Florida corporation, by its Chairman of the Board, does hereby
make and execute these Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:

         1. The name of the corporation is Associated Business & Commerce
Insurance Corporation.

         2. The first sentence of Section III(5) of the Articles of
Incorporation is hereby amended by increasing the number of shares from "900,000
shares" to "1,900,000 shares" so that the first sentence of Section III(5) in
its entirety reads as follows:

    The 6% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A (the "Series A
    Preferred Stock"), shall consist of 1,900,000 shares having a stated value
    of $10.00 per share (the "Stated Value").

         3. The date of the adoption of the amendment was May 2, 1996.

         4. The amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors, without
shareholder action, in accordance with Section 607.0602 of the Florida Business
Corporation Act.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles of Amendment to Articles of
Incorporation of Associated Business & Commerce Insurance Corporation have been
executed by Associated Business & Commerce Insurance Corporation, by its
Chairman of the Board, this 6th day of June, 1996.


                                          ASSOCIATED BUSINESS & COMMERCE
                                          INSURANCE CORPORATION


                                          By  /s/ LAWRENCE J. MARCHBANKS
                                             ----------------------------
                                              Lawrence J. Marchbanks,
                                              Chairman of the Board
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Office of the Managing Director","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DQNksF6fW1\"><a href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/bureaus-offices\/office-of-the-managing-director\/\">Office of the Managing Director<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/about-the-fmc\/bureaus-offices\/office-of-the-managing-director\/embed\/#?secret=DQNksF6fW1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Office of the Managing Director” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"DQNksF6fW1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANGEL SANCHEZ-VIGIL, AKA Moises 

Quintranar, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-72702 

Agency No. A073-963-023 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 19, 2021**

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Angel Sanchez-Vigil, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for adjustment of status. We 

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. See

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 27 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-72702 

Madrigal-Barcenas v. Lynch, 797 F.3d 643, 643-45 (9th Cir. 2015). We deny the 

petition for review.

The BIA did not err in concluding that Sanchez-Vigil’s conviction under 

California Health & Safety Code § 11550(a) is a controlled substance violation that 

renders him ineligible for adjustment of status. See 8 U.S.C. 

§§ 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II), 1255(i)(2)(A); Tejeda v. Barr, 960 F.3d 1184, 1186 (9th 

Cir. 2020) (holding California Health & Safety Code § 11550(a) is divisible, and 

using a plea agreement and charging document to establish the elements of 

conviction); Lopez v. Sessions, 901 F.3d 1071, 1075 (9th Cir. 2018) (Federal First 

Offender Act treatment is limited to simple possession of a controlled substance 

offenses).

In light of this disposition, we decline to reach Sanchez-Vigil’s contentions 

regarding his visa petition. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 

2004) (the courts are not required to decide issues that are unnecessary to the 

results).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.