alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Information Quality Guidelines","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"N0kHqtB3VG\"><a href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/information-quality-guidelines\/\">Information Quality Guidelines<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/about-the-fmc\/information-quality-guidelines\/embed\/#?secret=N0kHqtB3VG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Information Quality Guidelines” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"N0kHqtB3VG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 31.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, James F. Carroll, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Freestone Resources, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



---

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date: October 16, 2007















/s/ James F. Carroll





James F. Carroll









Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Chairman Cordero Says New Alliances Demand Aggressive Oversight","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OpswQUVNsl\"><a href=\"\/chairman-cordero-says-new-alliances-demand-aggressive-oversight\/\">Chairman Cordero Says New Alliances Demand Aggressive Oversight<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/chairman-cordero-says-new-alliances-demand-aggressive-oversight\/embed\/#?secret=OpswQUVNsl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Chairman Cordero Says New Alliances Demand Aggressive Oversight” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"OpswQUVNsl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00002-CR

JA'COBY JEROME ACLESE,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-1326-C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ja’coby Jerome Aclese appeals a judgment of conviction for multiple offenses: 

Indecency with a Child, Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child, and Sexual Assault of a 

Child. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 21.11; 22.021; 22.011 (West 20xx). The information 

we have been provided by the trial court clerk indicates the judgment was rendered on 

November 27, 2017. Aclese was required to file his notice of appeal within 30 days after 

the day the trial court rendered the order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). His notice of 
Aclese v. State Page 2

appeal filed on January 2, 2018 is therefore untimely. See id. We have no jurisdiction of 

an untimely appeal, and this appeal must be dismissed. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 

522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate jurisdiction where notice of appeal is untimely). 

Further, because the trial court’s certificate of right of appeal that Aclese signed indicates 

that Aclese waived his right to appeal, this appeal must be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

25.2(d) (“The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the 

right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.”); Monreal v. State, 

99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (waiver of appeal).

Notwithstanding that we are dismissing this appeal, Aclese may file a motion for 

rehearing with this Court within 15 days after this opinion and judgment are rendered if 

Aclese believes this opinion and judgment are erroneously based on inaccurate 

information or documents. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. Moreover, if Aclese desires to have 

the opinion and judgment of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary 

review, that petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days 

after either the day this Court’s judgment is rendered or the day the last timely motion 

for rehearing is overruled by this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a).

For the reasons stated, this appeal is dismissed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Aclese v. State Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed January 10, 2018

Do not publish 

[CR25]
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2834 

To protect minors from premature waiver of their constitutional rights during 

a custodial interrogation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2021 

Mr. CA ́RDENAS (for himself and Ms. BASS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To protect minors from premature waiver of their constitutional rights during a custodial interrogation, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Miranda 

5 Rights for Kids Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF MIRANDA RIGHTS BY A MINOR. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 223 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 3051 

9 the following: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2834 IH

1 ‘‘§ 3501A. Custodial interrogation of a minor 

2 ‘‘(a) NOTIFICATION.—Any law enforcement officer 

3 who has arrested a minor for a violation of law shall notify 

4 the minor’s parent, guardian, or legal custodian that the 

5 minor has been arrested and shall provide the location of 

6 where the minor is being detained. 

7 ‘‘(b) WAIVER.—A minor who is subject to a custodial 

8 interrogation may only waive the privilege against self-in9 crimination or the right to assistance of legal counsel if 

10 the minor consults with legal counsel in person before such 

11 waiver. 

12 ‘‘(c) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply 

13 if— 

14 ‘‘(1) custodial interrogation of a minor is nec15 essary to gather information to protect life from an 

16 imminent threat; and 

17 ‘‘(2) the questions that were asked during the 

18 custodial interrogation were reasonably necessary to 

19 obtain such information. 

20 ‘‘(d) ASSIGNED COUNSEL.— 

21 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A minor who is subject to 

22 a custodial interrogation shall have the right to have 

23 the legal counsel assigned to the minor’s case phys24 ically present during such interrogation. 

25 ‘‘(2) VIOLATION.—In the case of custodial in26 terrogation of a minor, it shall be a violation of this 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2834 IH

1 subsection for the minor to be represented by any 

2 substitute counsel temporarily assigned to represent 

3 the minor. 

4 ‘‘(e) INADMISSIBLE.—In any criminal prosecution 

5 brought by the United States, any statement given by a 

6 minor during a custodial interrogation that does not com7 ply with this section, and any evidence derived from that 

8 statement, shall be inadmissible. 

9 ‘‘(f) MINOR DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

10 ‘minor’ means an individual who has not attained 18 years 

11 of age.’’. 

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

13 for chapter 223 of title 18, United States Code, is amend14 ed by inserting after the item relating to section 3501 the 

15 following item: 

‘‘3501A. Custodial interrogation of a minor.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencyShares® Swedish Krona Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010, as amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Trust.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 10, 2011                                 
|                                                     
|/S/ NICK BONOS                                       
|Nick Bonos*                                          
|Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal executive officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 33 87

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lPla in ti

ff - App el le e
v. Mark S te ve n Hal l ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e So ut he rnDis tri ctof I owa- Dav enpo rt

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Apri l 3 0, 2 01 8 Fi le d: May 3, 20 18 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re GRUENDER, BENTON, andSTRAS, Ci rcu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM. Mark Hal l d ire ct ly app eal s t he sen te nc e th e di st ric t co urt im po se d upo n h im 1 aft er rev ok in g hi s supe rv is ed rel eas e. Hall ’s co un se l ha s m ov ed fo r le av e to wit hd raw Th e Hon or ab le St ep ha ni e M. Ro se , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r t h e 1 So ut he rnDis tri ctof I owa .an d ha s fil ed a br ie f qu es ti on in g whe th er th e di st ric t co urt ap pr op ria te ly ha nd le d th e

g o v e rn men t’s no nd is cl os ur e of cert ai n ev id en ce to de fen se co un se l pr io r to th e rev oc at io n h eari ng . W e co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co urt’s res po ns e was ap pr op ria te
. Hall kn ew th e na tu re of th e un di sc lo se d ev id en ce, ha d an op po rtu ni ty to co nf er wit h co un se l du rin g a sh ort con ti nu an ce, and di d no t requ es t a lo ng er con ti nu an ce. Se e Fed
. R. Cri m . P. 16 (d )(2 ) (li st in g th e av ai labl e rem ed ie s fo r a pa rty’ s fai lu re to co m pl y wit h di sc ov ery ru le s) ; Uni te d St at es v. Ti be sa r , 89 4 F
. 2 d 31 7, 31 9 (8 th Ci r. 19 90 ) (rev ie win g a di st r i c t c ou rt’s de ci si on no t to ex cl ud e ev id en ce un de r Ru le 16 fo r an ab us e of di sc ret io n)
. W e acco rd in gl y affi rm th e jud gm en t an d gr an t co un se l’s m ot io n to withd raw.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

782 

CAF 15-00692 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF KRISTIN M. DAWLEY, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SEAN T. DAWLEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

PAUL B. WATKINS, FAIRPORT, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

MICHELLE M. SCUDERI, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, WATERTOWN. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County (Peter

A. Schwerzmann, A.J.), entered March 24, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant

to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed with prejudice the

petition of petitioner seeking to modify a prior consent order with

respect to respondent’s visitation with the subject children. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs.

Memorandum: In appeal No. 2, petitioner mother appeals from an

order that dismissed with prejudice her petition seeking to modify a

prior consent order with respect to respondent father’s visitation

with the subject children. While this appeal was pending, Family

Court entered an order upon the consent of the parties that resolved

the relevant visitation issues, thereby rendering this appeal moot

(see Matter of Warren v Hibbs, 136 AD3d 1306, 1306, lv denied 27 NY3d

909). We conclude that the exception to the mootness doctrine does

not apply (see id.; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50

NY2d 707, 714-715).

The mother has not raised any contentions with respect to the

order in appeal No. 1, and we therefore dismiss that appeal (see

Abasciano v Dandrea, 83 AD3d 1542, 1545; see generally Ciesinski v

Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 984).

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         11,977
<SECURITIES>                                    5,393
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,370
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,339
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          125
<OTHER-SE>                                     62,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,370
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,898
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 8,604
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    8,604
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .007
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .007



</TABLE>
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of CurrencySharesSM Swedish Krona Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carl G. Verboncoeur, Chief
Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: January 25, 2008

/s/ Carl G. VerboncoeurCarl G.
Verboncoeur*Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)

*The Registrant is a
trust and Carl G. Verboncoeur is signing in his capacity as the principal executive
officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.1 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of TAM S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DavidBarioni Neto, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

     (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: June 30, 2009 

By: /s/ David Barioni NetoDavid Barioni Neto Chief Executive Officer 

125 

----