alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBig Cat Energy Corporation(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period end ofJuly 31, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Robert Goodale, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 13thday of September, 2007.                                                                                                               
|   

ROBERT GOODALERobert GoodaleChief Financial Officer





















---
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of Community Bancorp Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such
period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.



|                   |  |  |  |                                            
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael J. Perdue                      
|                   |  |  |  | Michael J. Perdue                          
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer      
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 12, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ L. Bruce Mills, Jr.                    
|                   |  |  |  | L. Bruce Mills, Jr.                        
|                   |  |  |  | Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Community Bancorp Inc. and will be retained by Community Bancorp Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Newtown Lane Marketing, Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
June 15, 2010





/s/ Kirk M. WarshawKirk
      M. WarshawChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Daniel Generelli, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Baynon
         International Corporation;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
         statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
         material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
         this annual report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
         establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
         defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
         we have:

         a)       designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
                  that material information relating to the registrant,
                  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
                  by others within those entities, particularly during the
                  period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b)       evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
                  controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
                  the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date");
                  and

         c)       presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
                  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
                  on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, base
         on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
         audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
         performing the equivalent functions):

         a)       all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
                  internal controls which could adversely affect the
                  registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
                  financial data and have identified for the registrant's
                  auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b)       any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
                  or other employees who have a significant role in the
                  registrant's internal controls.


Date: April 26, 2005


/s/ Daniel Generelli
-------------------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Consumer Affairs & Dispute Resolution Services","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AvKmU5Av7i\"><a href=\"\/databases-services\/consumer-affairs-dispute-resolution-services\/\">Consumer Affairs & Dispute Resolution Services<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/databases-services\/consumer-affairs-dispute-resolution-services\/embed\/#?secret=AvKmU5Av7i\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Consumer Affairs & Dispute Resolution Services” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"AvKmU5Av7i\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1739** 

ANDRES LEROY GLENN , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. GWEN RICHARDSON , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv - 01147

- CMC )

Submitted : September 23, 2014 Decided: September 25, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit J udges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Andres Leroy Glenn, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Andres Leroy Glenn seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss without prejudice Glenn’s civil complaint . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6 ). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bow l e s v. Russell , 551 U.S. 2 0 5, 2 1 4 ( 2007 ). The district court’s order was entered on the docket

on May 19, 2014 . The notice of appeal was filed on July 22, 2014 , sixty

- four days later . Because Glenn failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 1, 2010

p1123 

# Order

December 1, 2010

142058 & (3)(4)

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 142058 ADB: 07-88-JC; 07-89-JC RALPH E. MUSILLI and WALTER BAUMGARDNER, JR., Respondents-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED as moot.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BUSINESS
OBJECTS 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          71,713
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,236
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,942
<PP&E>                                          13,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,838
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,166
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,081
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   138,085
<SALES>                                        166,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,894
<CGS>                                           27,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               123,946
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,855
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,316)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,287
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,287
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,253
<SECURITIES>                                    22,076
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (856)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,076
<PP&E>                                           6,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,543)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,328
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,038
<SALES>                                          7,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,445
<CGS>                                            2,329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,069
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,543)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,543)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,543)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          41,548
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,723
<PP&E>                                         193,523
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (46,519)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,186,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          863,859
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,903,162
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,580,922)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,186,099
<SALES>                                         63,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,744
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               916,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                916,273
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            916,273
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   916,273
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50242

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL ANTHONY JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-95-CA-270

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Johnson appeals the district court’s denial of his

motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 wherein he argued, inter

alia, that the district court misapplied the career-offender

provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines and that his counsel was

ineffective for failing to argue such at sentencing. 

 The two prior convictions which designated Johnson as a

career offender were separated by an intervening arrest. Thus,

the convictions could not have been considered related under any

set of factual criteria set forth by Johnson. See U.S.S.G. 
No. 96-50242

- 2 -

§ 4A1.2(a)(2), comment. (n.3); United States v. Fitzhugh, 984

F.2d 143, 146-47 n.15 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 895

(1993). Trial counsel was not deficient for failing to make an

argument that would have been legally meritless. Smith v.

Puckett, 907 F.2d 581, 585 n.6 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498

U.S. 1033 (1991). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

To the extent that a certificate of appealability (COA) may be

required, it is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES?OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baynon International
Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Pasquale Catizone, President of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  October 25, 2006


/s/ PASQUALE CATIZONE
-----------------------------
Pasquale Catizone
President
(Principal Executive Officer)

                                       11
Exhibit 10.2 - Amended Letter of Intent





Exhibit 10.2

MEDUSA STYLE CORPORATION

Suite 210-580 Hornby Street

Vancouver, BC V6C 3B6 Canada

Tel: 604-687-6991

March 31, 2007



Paul Fishkin

And To: Tolga Katas

And To: Christine Marie

And To: En2Go Inc.

4128 Colfax Avenue

Studio City, CA

91604 USA



Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: Amendment to Letter of Intent of February 1, 2007



The parties mutually agree to amend the duly executed Letter of Intent (“LOI”) dated February 1, 2007 as follow:



Paragraph 1 – Negotiation of Definitive Agreements shall be amended to read “If such definitive agreements are not negotiated and executed on or before May 31, 2007 (or such other date agreed to by the parties), either MSC (Medusa Style Corporation) or EN2 (En2Go Inc.) may elect to discontinue the negotiations for the transactions and terminate this LOI.”



Exhibit A Paragraph 3 – Signing and Closing shall be amended to read “The parties’ objective is to sign and close the Definitive Agreement on or about May 31, 2007”.



All other terms and conditions contained in the said Letter of Intent remains the same and in full force and effect.

Yours truly,

MEDUSA STYLE CORPORATION

BRUCE SCHMIDT

Bruce Schmidt

President, CEO and Director






The above terms are hereby agreed to on this 5th day of April, 2007

 

 

PAUL FISHKIN

Paul Fishkin

TOLGA KATAS

Tolga Katas

CHRISTINE MARIE

Christine Marie

 

EN2GO, INC.

 

PAUL FISHKIN

Paul Fishkin

President, CEO and Director