alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12

                            PSEG ENERGY HOLDINGS INC.
               Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges




                                               For the Six Months Ended June 30,
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                   2001                 2000
                                               -------------       -------------

Earnings as Defined in Regulation S-K (A):

Pre-tax income from Continuing
  Operations .............................          80,438              44,018
(Income)/Loss from equity investees net
  of distributions .......................         (32,415)             26,206
Fixed Charges ............................          86,458              81,374
Amortization of capitalized interest .....             159               3,411
Capitalized interest .....................         (10,262)             (8,248)
                                                  ---------            -------
Earnings .................................         124,378             146,761
                                                  =========            =======


Fixed Charges as Defined in Regulation S-K (B):

Total interest expensed and capitalized...          84,966              79,817
Interest in rental expense ...............           1,492               1,557
                                                  --------             -------
Total Fixed Charges ......................          86,458              81,374
                                                  ========             =======
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges .......            1.44                1.80
                                                  ========             =======


(A)  The term  "earnings"  shall be defined as pre-tax  income  from  continuing
     operations before adjustment for minority  interests or income or loss from
     equity  investees.  Add fixed charges adjusted to exclude (a) the amount of
     any interest capitalized during the period, (b) amortization of capitalized
     interest and (c) distributed  income of equity  investees.  From the total,
     subtract interest capitalized.

(B)  Fixed Charges represent (a) interest, whether expensed or capitalized,  (b)
     amortization of debt discount,  premium and expense, and (c) an estimate of
     interest implicit in rentals.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Buy American Reports","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UHYG3SG2ZT\"><a href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/buy-american-reports\/\">Buy American Reports<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/about-the-fmc\/buy-american-reports\/embed\/#?secret=UHYG3SG2ZT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Buy American Reports” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"UHYG3SG2ZT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Chairman Cordero Addressed the International Propeller Club","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"V2ykGYDyzR\"><a href=\"\/chairman-cordero-addressed-the-international-propeller-club\/\">Chairman Cordero Addressed the International Propeller Club<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/chairman-cordero-addressed-the-international-propeller-club\/embed\/#?secret=V2ykGYDyzR\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Chairman Cordero Addressed the International Propeller Club” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"V2ykGYDyzR\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### GPS INDUSTRIES, INC. and Optimal I.P. Holdings, L.P., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALTEX CORPORATION, Deca International Corp., Golflogix, Inc., and L1 Technologies, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and GPS Golf Pro, LLC, Karrier Communications, GPS Technologies, Inc., Links Point, Inc., and Tee2green Technologies, Pty Ltd., Defendants and Skyhawke Technologies, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2009-1535.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 8, 2011.

Theresa M. Dawson, Shore Chan Bra-galone, LLP, of Dallas, TX, argued for the plaintiffs-appellants. With her on the brief were Michael W. Shore, Rajkumar Vinnakota and Alfonso Garcia Chan.

John L. Hendricks, Hitchcock Evert LLP, of Dallas, TX, for defendants-appel-lees Altex Corporation, et al.

Thomas J. Fisher, Obion, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P., of Alexandria, VA, argued for defendant-ap-pellee Skyhawke Technologies, LLC. With him on the brief were Arthur I. Neustadt, Jordan S. Weinstein, Robert C. Nissen and Eric W. Schweibenz.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, PROST and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
*Order Entered May 19, 2010:*

#### King v McPherson Hospital,

Docket No. 284436 * .

*

 Opinion by special panel reported at 290 Mich App 299 (2010) —Reporter.

The Court orders that a special panel will be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(J) to resolve the conflict between this case and *Farley v Carp,*287 Mich App 1; 782 NW2d 508 (2010).

The Court further orders that the opinion in this case released on April 27, 2010, is vacated in its entirety. MCR 7.215(J)(5).

Appellant may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the clerk’s certification of this order. Appellees may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the service of appellant’s brief. Nine copies must be filed with the Clerk of the Court.

Gleicher, J., did not participate.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 207 (Friday, October 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23397]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

[Docket DARS-2017-0008; OMB Control Number 0704-0497]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Acquisition Regulations System has submitted to 
OMB for clearance, the following proposal for collection of information 
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by November 
27, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark Gomersall, 571-372-6099.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 
Supplement (DFARS) Part 15 Negotiation; OMB Control Number 0704-0497.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit and not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    Reporting Frequency: On Occasion.
    Number of Respondents: 277.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 277.
    Average Burden per Response: 4 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 1,108.
    Needs and Uses: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement 
(DFARS) 215.403-5 provides contractors with guidance for the submittal 
of forward pricing rate proposals, and includes a checklist for 
contractors to use in preparing their proposals. The checklist is 
submitted to DoD with the forward pricing rate proposal.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Comments and recommendations on the proposed information collection 
should be sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra, DoD Desk Officer, at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#317e5843506e4244535c584242585e5f715e5c531f545e411f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="56193f2437092523343b3f25253f393816393b347833392678313920">[email protected]</span></a>. Please identify the proposed information 
collection by DoD Desk Officer and the Docket ID number and title of 
the information collection.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. Frederick C. Licari.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Licari at: WHS/ESD Directives Division, 4800 Mark 
Center Drive, 2nd Floor, East Tower, Suite 03F09, Alexandria, VA 22350-
3100.

Jennifer L. Hawes,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2017-23397 Filed 10-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0364

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LAURRIE ANNE WHEELER - JEAKINS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 15, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 9 2024

02/09/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0364
#### GUICHUN XUAN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-73109.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2010.

Guichun Xuan, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Ari Nazarov, Oil, Carol Federighi, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, William Charles Peachey, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Guichun Xuan, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Husyev v. Mukasey,*528 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination because Xuan displayed a lack of basic knowledge of her claimed religion. *See Singh v. Ashcroft,*367 F.3d 1139, 1143 (9th Cir.2004) (approving an adverse credibility conclusion based in part on an expectation that one who claims active participation in a group has a deeper understanding of that group’s beliefs). Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination because the IJ’s negative assessment of Xuan’s demeanor, including her hesitant and evasive manner of testimony, is entitled to special deference. *See Singh-Kaur v. INS,*183 F.3d 1147, 1151 (9th Cir.1999). In the absence of credible *258testimony, Xuan’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Because Xuan’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony found to be not credible, and she points to no other evidence the IJ should have considered, substantial evidence also supports the denial of CAT relief. *See id.*at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 D0 26 1 . I N THE I N TEREST OF A. M. et a l , CHI LDREN (MOTHER).

Th e m o t her o f th e ab o v e-referen ced m i n o r ch il d ren s eek s d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew

o f t h e ju v en i le co u rt ’ s o rd er ru li n g t h at t h e M u s co g ee Co u n t y Dep art m en t o f Fam i l y

an d Ch i l d ren Serv i ces i s n o t req u i red t o p ro v i d e s erv i ces i nt en d ed t o reu n i fy h er wi th

t h e ch i l d ren

. Th e ju v en i l e co urt ’ s o rd er, h o wev er, i s d irect l y ap peal ab l e. See In t h e

In t er es t o f S

. A. W

. , 2 2 8 G a. Ap p. 1 9 7

, 1 9 9 (1 ) (4 91 SE2 d 4 4 1) (1 9 9 7). W e w i l l g ran t

a t i m el y d i s cret i on ary ap p li cat i o n i f t h e l o wer co u rt ’ s o rd er is su b j ect to d i rect ap p eal

. See OCGA § 5-6 -3 5 (j). A cco rd i n g l y , t hi s ap pl i cat io n is h ereb y GR A N T ED

. Th e

m o th er s h al l h av e t en d ay s fro m t h e d at e of th i s o rd er t o fi l e a n o t i ce of ap p eal wi th

t h e ju v en i l e co u rt

. If sh e h as al read y fi l ed a n ot i ce o f ap p eal

, s h e n eed n o t fi l e a

s eco n d n o t i ce. Th e cl erk o f th e ju v en i l e co u rt i s DIRECTED t o i n cl u d e a co p y o f t h i s

o rd er i n t h e reco rd t ran s m i t t ed t o t h e Co u rt o f Ap p eal s.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. January 23, 2019

01/23/2019
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Controlled Carrier List","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"POLDjEDC4o\"><a href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/controlled-carrier-list\/\">Controlled Carrier List<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/about-the-fmc\/controlled-carrier-list\/embed\/#?secret=POLDjEDC4o\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Controlled Carrier List” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"POLDjEDC4o\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EX-34 (e)
(logo) Crowe
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Member Horwath International




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Audit Committee
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
West Palm Beach, Florida


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report,
that Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for the Residential Mortgage Loans Platform (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria
1122(1)(iii) and 1122(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable
to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. The
Platform consists of the asset-backed transactions and securities defined by
management in Appendix B of Management's Report. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based on the aforementioned applicable servicing
criteria.


/s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC


Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 8, 2007