alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to



18 U.S.C. Section 1350,



As Adopted Pursuant to



Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of eUniverse, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Brett C. Brewer, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas J. Flahie, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  October 30, 2003 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/  Brett C. Brewer 
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|                        |  |  | 
|Date:  October 30, 2003 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/  Thomas J. Flahie
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                      



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to eUniverse, Inc. and will be retained by eUniverse, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elver Diaz-VEGA, a/k/a Elver Vega-Diaz, a/k/a Elver Mendez-Vega, a/k/a Al, a/k/a Raymond Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7538.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

Elver Diaz-Vega, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Zalkin Hitt, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Julius Ness Richardson, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jeffrey Mikell Johnson, James Chris Leventis, Jr., Office of the *246United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elver Diaz-Vega seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 23, 2013. The notice of appeal was filed on September 19, 2013.* Because Diaz-Vega failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7563

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner - Appellee,

v. VICTOR PERKINS, Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:92-hc-654-BR)

Submitted: January 20, 2009 Decided: February 6, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Jane E. Pearce, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. George E. B. Holding, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, David T. Huband, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Victor Perkins appeals the district court’s order continuing his civil commitment under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2006). On appeal, he argues that the district court erred in concluding that his release would pose a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to property of another as a result of mental disease or defect. We affirm. In order for Perkins to succeed in his renewed attempt at release, it was incumbent upon him to show by a preponderance of the evidence that he has recovered from his mental disease or defect to such extent that his release would no longer create a substantial risk. See 18 U.S.C. § 4246(e) (2006). The district court’s finding on the matter will not be overturned on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous. See United States v. Cox , 964 F.2d 1431, 1433 (4th Cir. 1992). After conducting a hearing, the district court found by “overwhelming evidence” that Perkins “continues to suffer from a mental disease or defect as a result of which his release would create a danger to others.” Our thorough review of the record leads us to conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that continued civil commitment was warranted. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We further deny Perkins’ pro se motions for summary judgment and release. We dispense with oral argument because

23 the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SFBC International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I David
Natan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                                         /s/  David Natan
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

Date:   August 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 212 (Friday, November 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 51289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23900]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. ONRR-2012-0003; DS63613200 DR2000000.PX8000 189D0102R2]


U.S. Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative Multi-
Stakeholder Group (USEITI MSG) Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Interior.

ACTION: USEITI Advisory Committee meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The November 2017 United States Extractive Industries 
Transparency Initiative Advisory Committee meeting has been cancelled.

DATES: The meeting was scheduled for November 15-16, 2017, in 
Washington DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith Wilson, Program Manager; 1849 C 
Street NW., MS 4211; Washington, DC 20240. You may also contact the 
USEITI Secretariat via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#126761777b667b527b7d613c767d7b3c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9cccadcd0cdd0f9d0d6ca97ddd6d097ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a>, by phone at 202-
208-0272, or by fax at 202-513-0682.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Department of the Interior 
established the USEITI Advisory Committee on July 26, 2012, to serve as 
the USEITI multi-stakeholder group. The United States has officially 
withdrawn from the initiative but will continue to participate as a 
supporting country. More information about the Committee, including its 
charter, is available at www.doi.gov/eiti/faca.

Gregory J. Gould,
Director--Office of Natural Resources Revenue.
[FR Doc. 2017-23900 Filed 11-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4335-30-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350






In
connection with the accompanying Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB of HSM Holdings,
Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2007, I, Anthony Hu , Chief Executive
Officer of HSM Holdings, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.
            Such
      Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2007, fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
      ended December 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of HSM Holdings,
      Inc.









Date:
      March 31, 2008HSM
      Holdings, Inc.By:
      /s/
      Anthony HuChief
      Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES?OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Baynon International
Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel
Generelli, Treasurer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ DANIEL GENERELLI
-----------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)

                                       12
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Carl Savoy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/csavoy\/","title":"Commission Meeting Scheduled for\u00a0February\u00a025, 2022\u00a0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bXQ4KherLb\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-february-25-2022\/\">Commission Meeting Scheduled for\u00a0February\u00a025, 2022\u00a0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-february-25-2022\/embed\/#?secret=bXQ4KherLb\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Scheduled for\u00a0February\u00a025, 2022\u00a0” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"bXQ4KherLb\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 99.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of American Home Mortgage
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


       /s/ Stephen A. Hozie
------------------------------
Stephen A. Hozie
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2002
#### Norman JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JUST ENERGY, Defendant-Appellee, Rebecca MacDonald, Ken Hartwick, Scott Gahn, Darren Pritchett, Beth Summers, Humera Siddiqui, Wayne Morgan, Jason Herod, Chad Lansford, Defendants.

No. 12-3962.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Dec. 16, 2013.

Norman Johnson, Jamaica, NY, pro se.

Charles E. Dorkey III, Seth H. Borden, Rebecca Tingey, McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellee.

PRESENT: ROBERTA. KATZMANN, Chief Judge, RALPH K. WINTER and GUIDO CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Appellant, Norman Johnson, *pro se,*appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to his former employer, Just Energy, dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

We review *de novo*a district court’s grant of summary judgment, with the view that “[sjummary judgment is appropriate *72only if the moving party shows that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” *Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P.,*321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir.2003). Upon such review, we conclude that Johnson’s appeal is without merit for the reasons articulated by the district court in its order.

We have considered all of Johnson’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. We grant Just Energy’s motion to strike exhibits in Johnson’s appendix that were not part of the record before the district court. *See Int’l Bus. Machs. Corp. v. Edelstein,*526 F.2d 37, 45 (2d Cir.1975) (“[AJbsent extraordinary circumstances, federal appellate courts will not consider rulings or evidence which are not part of the trial record.”). We deny the motion as moot as to Johnson’s argument, raised for the first time on appeal, that he was denied a visa by the Australian consulate because he could not establish how he would pay for the trip, as we do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. *See Singleton v. Wulff,*428 U.S. 106, 120-21, 96 S.Ct. 2868, 49 L.Ed.2d 826 (1976).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos German PEREZ-VASQUEZ, also known as Carlos Vasquez-Perez, also known as Carlos Perez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-51332

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 2008.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos German Perez-Vasquez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Al-mendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *cert denied,*— U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government’s motion for summary af-firmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Briefed on Canadian Ballast Water Regulations","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IPy9B8QlWn\"><a href=\"\/commission-briefed-on-canadian-ballast-water-regulations\/\">Commission Briefed on Canadian Ballast Water Regulations<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-briefed-on-canadian-ballast-water-regulations\/embed\/#?secret=IPy9B8QlWn\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Briefed on Canadian Ballast Water Regulations” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"IPy9B8QlWn\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}