alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lucille DUNCAN, Plaintiff, v. OFFICIAL DETECTIVE STORIES, INC., a corporation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Civ. A. No. 29719.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

June 29, 1965.

*245Charles A. Lord, Paul R. Anapol, Richter, Lord, Toll & Cavanaugh, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Louis G. Hill, Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish, Kohn & Dilks, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

GRIM, Senior District Judge.

The complaint in this action contains an averment that jurisdiction of the court is founded upon diversity of citizenship.

In the diversity of citizenship statute it is stated:

> “(c) For the purposes of this * * * title a corporation shall be deemed a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business. * * * ” 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332(c).

In a suit such as the present one where an individual is suing a corporation, part of the suggested form for the averment of diversity jurisdiction as it is set forth in the suggested forms, in the appendix of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is:

> “Plaintiff is a [citizen of the State of Connecticut] and defendant is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of New York having its principal place of business in a State other than the State of Connecticut * *

Plaintiff attempts to aver diversity jurisdiction in her complaint. Paragraph 1 of the complaint avers that plaintiff is a resident and citizen of the State of Illinois. Paragraph 2 of the complaint avers that defendant, Official Detective Stories, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and “is a citizen thereof with a registered office located at 400 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia.” However, there is no averment as to where defendant’s principal place of business is, nor is there an averment that defendant’s principal place of business is in a State other than the State of Illinois. From the averments in the complaint alone, conceivably the principal place of the business of defendant might be in the State of Illinois and if that should be the fact this court would not have jurisdiction of this case.

In the case of Wymard v. McCloskey & Co. Inc., 342 F.2d 495, 497 (3d Cir. 1965), the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently observed

> “ * * * that numbers of cases continue to come before us on appeal in which failure to allege and prove the principal place of business of a corporate party has caused the record to be insufficient to establish the existence of alleged diversity jurisdiction. Yet, absent federal jurisdiction, no judgment of a federal court can stand. It is the continuing responsibility of trial counsel and trial courts to see that all essential jurisdictional facts are alleged and adequately established in the record.”

Jurisdictional facts have not been averred in this case.

ORDER

And now, this 29th day of June, 1965, it is ordered that the complaint in this case will be dismissed unless within thirty days plaintiff amends her complaint to allege appropriately jurisdiction in this court.
Executive Order 13814

# Amending Executive Order 13223

                        By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601*et seq.*), and in furtherance of the objectives of Proclamation 7463 of September 14, 2001 (Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks), which declared a national emergency by reason of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, in New York and Pennsylvania and against the Pentagon, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States, and in order to provide the Secretary of Defense additional authority to manage personnel requirements in a manner consistent with the authorization provided in Executive Order 13223 of September 14, 2001 (Ordering the Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces to Active Duty and Delegating Certain Authorities to the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Transportation), it is hereby ordered as follows:                    

**Section 1**                        .                         *Amendment to Executive Order 13223.*                         Section 1 of Executive Order 13223 is amended by adding at the end: “The authorities available for use during a national emergency under sections 688 and 690 of title 10, United States Code, are also invoked and made available, according to their terms, to the Secretary concerned, subject in the case of the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, to the direction of the Secretary of Defense.”                    

**Sec. 2**                        .                         *General Provisions.*                         (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:                    

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

                        (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.                              ( print page 49274)    

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

[FR Doc. 2017-23270

Billing code 3295-F8-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001089046
<NAME>                        ta#4imzz
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    NOV-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.000
<CASH>                                               47,608
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     47,608
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       75,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               245,496
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                485
<OTHER-SE>                                         (170,493)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         75,488
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      1,181
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    198,373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (197,192)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (197,192)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.020)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.020)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**Section 906 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer     Each of Thomas J. Mazzarisi, Chief Executive Officer, and Stephen J. Schoepfer, ChiefFinancial Officer, of JAG Media Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to their knowledge:     (1) The Company’s periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2007 (“Form10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.   CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER   /s/ Thomas J. Mazzarisi /s/ Stephen J. Schoepfer   Name: Thomas J. Mazzarisi Name: Stephen J. Schoepfer   Date: December 26, 2007
Certification
Pursuant To


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant To


Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of MagneGas Corporation (the "Company") on
Amended Form 10-KSB for the twelve months ending December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Luisa
Ingargiola, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results
of operations of the Company.








/s/Luisa
Ingargiola


Luisa
Ingargiola


Chief
Financial Officer







Dated:
April 9 , 2008
FLRA/FMCS NEWS

WASHINGTON, DC

Contact: Eric Prag FLRA.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 771-444-5859 March 12, 2024

FLRA/FMCS Public Town Hall – March 27, 2024

The Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) and Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service 

(FMCS) announce a Joint Agency Public Town Hall on March 27, 2024 at 1:00pm Eastern.

The virtual and in-person town hall will feature leadership from both agencies discussing the 

relationship between the FLRA and FMCS, how each serves its community and the public, and 

the benefits of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). It will be open to the public and will feature 

2 sessions.

The 1st session will feature FLRA Chairman Susan Tsui Grundmann; FMCS Deputy Director of 

Field Operations Javier Ramirez; and Martin Malin, Chairman of the Federal Service Impasses 

Panel. They will discuss the respective roles and relationships of the bodies they lead.

The 2nd session will be a discussion between ADR experts – FMCS Commissioner Thomas 

Olson; FLRA Collaboration and Dispute Resolution Office (CADRO) Director Michael Wolf;

and Merritt Weinstein, CADRO Senior Dispute Resolution Specialist. This roundtable will 

discuss what happens “behind the scenes” during ADR and what stakeholders should do to get 

the most out of these processes.

For in person registration, click here --- For Zoom registration, click here.

###

The FLRA administers the labor-management relations program for 2.1 million non-Postal federal 

employees worldwide, approximately 1.2 million of whom are represented in 2,200 bargaining 

units. It is charged with providing leadership in establishing policies and guidance related to 

federal-sector labor-management relations and with resolving disputes under, and ensuring 

compliance with, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
#### Deangelo WOODEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Leroy CARTLEDGE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-7367.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

Deangelo Wooden, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Deangelo Wooden seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on August 24, 2012. The notice of appeal was filed on August 21, 2013.* Because Wooden failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an *227extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is *227the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
| 1.     | Such      Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2007,      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year      ended December 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of 4301,  Inc. |

| Date:      August 22,  2008                                       |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                   |
| 4301,      Inc.                                                        |
|                                                                   |
| By:      /s/ Yusuke      Matsuo                                        |
| Yusuke      MatsuoChief      Executive Officer, Chief FinancialOfficer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR 1997, 1996 AND 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                       323
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,161
<PP&E>                                           4,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,451
<BONDS>                                          7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           363
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,504
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,954
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,809
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,131
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,678
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,678
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.00


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3419 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3419

 To amend the Hate Crime Statistics Act to include crimes against the 
                               homeless.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2009

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (for herself, Mr. Wexler, Mr. Cohen, 
Mr. Kucinich, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Ms. Norton, Mrs. Napolitano, Ms. Fudge, 
 Mr. McGovern, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, 
   Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Davis of Illinois, and Ms. Wasserman 
   Schultz) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Hate Crime Statistics Act to include crimes against the 
                               homeless.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hate Crimes Against the Homeless 
Statistics Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF HOMELESS.

    Section (1)(b) of the Hate Crime Statistics Act is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``homeless status,'' 
        after ``sexual orientation,''; and
            (2) by adding the the end the following:
            ``(6) As used in this subsection, the term `homeless 
        status' with respect to an individual, refers to an individual 
        who--
                    ``(A) lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate 
                nighttime residence; or
                    ``(B) has a primary nighttime residence that is--
                            ``(i) a public or private place not 
                        designed for, or ordinarily used as, a regular 
                        sleeping accommodation for human beings, 
                        including cars, parks, public spaces, abandoned 
                        buildings, substandard housing, bus or train 
                        stations, or similar settings;
                            ``(ii) a supervised publicly or privately 
                        operated shelter designed to provide temporary 
                        living accommodations, including motels, 
                        hotels, congregate shelters, and transitional 
                        housing; or
                            ``(iii) housing of other persons in which 
                        the individual is temporarily staying due to 
                        loss of housing, economic hardship, or a 
                        similar reason.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         October 31, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 25, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 61 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-14, CP2018-30.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-23594 Filed 10-30-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 1, 2022

No. 04-22-00179-CV

Rodney WARRIOR,

Appellant

v.

Maria Cristina WARRIOR,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI07193

Honorable Monique Diaz, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due on June 24, 2022. On June 30, 2022, the court reporter 

filed a notice of late record indicating the reporter’s record was not filed because appellant had 

failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the record and that 

appellant was not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court no later than 

July 11, 2022 that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to 

pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. If

appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the court will consider only those issues 

or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of July, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court