alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter Randale RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50334

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 24, 2010.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ricardo Guzman, Law Office of Rick Guzman, P.C., Round Rock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Walter Randale Ramos appeals the 240-month sentence imposed in connection with his guilty-plea conviction for possession with the intent to distribute at least 50 grams of methamphetamine. Ramos argues that the district court erred by denying a reduction for acceptance of responsibility under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) § 3E1.1. He contends that his explanation regarding the presence of drugs found in his vehicle was not essen*953tial to the conduct of the offense. Ramos asserts that he is entitled to a reduction for acceptance of responsibility because he pleaded guilty and did not contest the factual basis.

A defendant may receive a two-level reduction in offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 if he “clearly demonstrates acceptance of responsibility for his offense.” U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3El.l(a). The defendant bears the burden of demonstrating that the reduction is warranted. *United States v. Watson,*988 F.2d 544, 551 (5th Cir.1993). “While the district court’s findings under the sentencing guidelines are generally reviewed for clear error, a determination whether a defendant is entitled to an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility is reviewed with even greater deference.” *United States v. Buchanan,*485 F.3d 274, 287 (5th Cir.2007). “We will affirm a sentencing court’s decision not to award a reduction” pursuant to § 3E1.1 unless the decision is “without foundation.” *United States v. Juarez-Duarte,*513 F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

The district court did not err in denying credit for acceptance of responsibility. The court did not find credible Ramos’s explanation of his possession of the methamphetamine. Ramos’s claim that he believed he was in possession of a pair of shoes when he stole a fruit snacks box containing methamphetamine was an attempt to minimize his conduct by denying his knowledge of the methamphetamine. *See Watson,*988 F.2d at 551. Contrary to Ramos’s argument on appeal, guilty knowledge is an essential element of the offense. *See United States v. Solis,*299 F.3d 420, 446 (5th Cir.2002). Given the deference owed to a district court’s findings on acceptance of responsibility, Ramos has not shown that the denial of the reduction was without foundation. *See Juarez-Duarte,*513 F.3d at 211.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Freestone Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Freestone Resources.





Dated:  July 16, 2007



/s/ James F. Carroll



Name: James F. Carroll

Title:  Chief Executive Officer







Dated:  July 16, 2007



/s/ James F. Carroll



Name: James F. Carroll

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CURTIS W. MEWBOURNE / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of
Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 06-A, L.P. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K, for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 and filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneName:

Curtis W. MewbourneDate:

March 31, 2009
Document

Exhibit 10.3
Linkou Branch of Mega International Commercial Bank
Credit Authorization Approval Notice
Date: 2022/03/04
I.Total credit limit: USD 20 million or equivalent in foreign currency on a revolving basis.
II.Credit limit type: Short-term loans for material purchase
III.Drawdown method:
1.The loan may be drawn by O/A or T/T by presenting a loan drawdown form and relevant documents (including but not limited to invoices and purchase orders) for the drawdown of 100% of the amount.
2.Relevant documents may be in the form of a list (the list must clearly specify information such as the transaction document name, number, date, payment terms or expiry date, name of the transaction counterparty, and the transaction amount for each transaction; the applicant must also issue an affidavit stating that the transactions specified in the information are true and there are no repeated financing). The applicant is not required to provide individual shipping forms but shall provide the photocopies of transaction forms and shipping forms for no fewer than 3 transactions on the list (for inspection by the Bank). The shipping forms must be provided for the prepayments at a later date.
3.The Company may pay the transaction counterparty 3 days after the fund allocation date (T+3) and deliver photocopies of relevant documents for reference.
IV.Drawdown period: 2022/03/04~2023/03/03。
V.Rates of interest (costs):
1.USD: Interest shall accrue at TAIFX OFFER for six months plus 0.23% and divided by 0.946. The interest rate shall be adjusted once every month but shall not be lower than the USD basic loan interest rate plus 0.1%.
2.Other currencies: Cost of the borrowing for the Bank plus 1.0% and divided by 0.946.
3.Acceptance fee rate: The annual fee rate is 0.75% and calculated based on the number of actual acceptance days. The fee is collected in full upon acceptance.
VI.Repayment deadline: The repayment deadline for each loan (including the period for the acceptance of bill of exchange) shall not exceed 120 days.








VII.Collateral: None
VIII.Joint guarantor: None
IX.Other terms:
1.Intended use of the loan: Provided as operating capital for the borrower's purchase of materials.
2.During the loan period of the Project, your company's parent company, Super Micro Computer, Inc., shall maintain 100% direct (indirect) shareholding of your company. However, this does not apply if your company is a public company.
3.Your company agrees to maintain an average demand deposit balance equal to 10% of the total loan amount during the loan period, subject to inspection once every 3 months. If your company fails to meet the criterion, the interest rate shall be increased by an additional 0.1%. Your company also agrees to maintain an average demand deposit balance equal to 10% of the total loan amount at the Bank during the loan period, subject to inspection once a year.
To:
Super Micro Computer, Inc. Taiwan


/s/ Linkou Branch of Mega International Commercial Bank
    Company stamp    Date: March 4th, 2022
/s/ De-Ming Lin stamp
    Personal stamp of Mega Bank Linkou Branch Deputy Manager    Date: March 4th, 2022
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1911** 

LENIR RICHARDSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. O. J. FAULK, Officer, badge #2908; D. N. CUSTER, Officer, badge #3756; OFFICER RIZZA; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY; MARIO TORRES, Sergeant , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 01489

- LMB

- TCB )

Submitted : December 9, 2016 Decided: January 9, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Lenir Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Pace Baucom, Assistant County Attorney, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Lenir Richardson appeals the district court ’ s order s denying her motion to remand and dismissing her complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord ingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Richardson v. Faulk , No. 1:15

- cv - 01489

- LMB

- TCB (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2015; July 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Arnold Hantman, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of SFBC International, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 10, 2005



| | /s/ARNOLDHANTMAN       
| | -----------------------
| | Chief Executive Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6784

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DESMON TERRILL BARNHILL, a/k/a T.B., a/k/a Terry , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. ( 7:10

- cr
- 00075

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : August 23, 2018 Decided: August 28, 2018

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Desmon Terrill Barnhill , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Desmon Terrill Barnhill appeals the di strict court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion s for reduction of sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Barnhill , No. 7:10

- cr
- 00075

- D

- 1 (E.D.N.C. June 20 , 2018)

. We deny Barnhill’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid t he decisional process.
AFFIRMED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Publishes Tentative Schedule & Witness List for P4-16 Hearings","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sL4wDaTEIl\"><a href=\"\/commission-publishes-tentative-schedule-witness-list-for-p4-16-hearings\/\">Commission Publishes Tentative Schedule & Witness List for P4-16 Hearings<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-publishes-tentative-schedule-witness-list-for-p4-16-hearings\/embed\/#?secret=sL4wDaTEIl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Publishes Tentative Schedule & Witness List for P4-16 Hearings” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"sL4wDaTEIl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Acting Chairman Khouri Addresses Gemini Shippers Group Annual Meeting","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Lg6lRzhVzK\"><a href=\"\/acting-chairman-khouri-addresses-gemini-shippers-group-annual-meeting\/\">Acting Chairman Khouri Addresses Gemini Shippers Group Annual Meeting<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/acting-chairman-khouri-addresses-gemini-shippers-group-annual-meeting\/embed\/#?secret=Lg6lRzhVzK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Acting Chairman Khouri Addresses Gemini Shippers Group Annual Meeting” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"Lg6lRzhVzK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2921 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2921

  To prohibit funds from being used to implement the Internet Covert 
 Operations Program under the United States Postal Inspection Service, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2021

 Mr. Gaetz (for himself, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Buck, Mr. Perry, Mr. Biggs, 
  Mr. Burchett, Mr. Massie, Mr. Steube, Mr. Gosar, and Mrs. Greene of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit funds from being used to implement the Internet Covert 
 Operations Program under the United States Postal Inspection Service, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``USPIS Surveillance Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds as follows:
            (1) The United States Postal Service has been operating a 
        clandestine domestic surveillance program of Americans' social 
        media activity known as the Internet Covert Operations Program 
        (iCOP).
            (2) iCOP is part of the United States Postal Inspection 
        Service which is the law enforcement and security component of 
        USPS.
            (3) The USP Inspection Service is operating outside of its 
        USPS jurisdiction when it monitors internet users' sharing of 
        information as its jurisdiction is narrowly defined within 
        postal mail only.
            (4) The iCOP program is a violation of privacy; it 
        encroaches upon the private lives of Americans and seeks to 
        curb constitutional rights of the First Amendment.
            (5) iCOP is not only illegal for operating outside of its 
        stated jurisdiction, but also politically motivated in its 
        target.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING OF PROGRAM.

    No Federal funds (including amounts available in the Postal Service 
Fund established under section 2003 of title 39, United States Code) 
may be used to implement, conduct, or otherwise carry out the Internet 
Covert Operations Program operated by the United States Postal 
Inspection Service or any other domestic surveillance program with 
politically motivated targets.
                                 <all>
```
Ho. -i?-n- no.,^-cV

1/ j FILED ,N COURT OF APPEALS

IHa->> 3• i-hy\t ?Au nh> ^^ LOW

Mice of WMS S&vj "f'% „ i,

IrUf <*»* toi.-3'V L~' ^fhxtfoh

toWfe .< *^ ,n ^^ ^^ ^^
Federal Maritime Commission

Mid-Atlantic and Northeast Port Congestion

Forum

Location: World Trade Center

401 E. Pratt Street

Baltimore, MD 21202

Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Time: 9:30 AM – 6:00 PM

8:45 AM Arrival 

9:30 AM Welcome 

Commissioner William P. Doyle, Federal Maritime Commission

Commissioner Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. Federal Maritime Commission

9:35 AM Opening Remarks

Hon. Helen D. Bentley

9:45 AM Port Authority, MTO & Shipping Association

 David Thomas, Port of Baltimore 

 Bayard Hogans, Ports America Chesapeake 

 John Reinhart, Port of Virginia 

 Rick Larrabee, Port Authority of New York & New Jersey 

 John Nardi, NY Shipping Association

 John Atkins, Global Container Terminals 

10:30 AM U.S. Coast Guard

 Capt. Drew Tucci, USCG 
10:40 AM Carrier 

 Howard Finkel, China Ocean Shipping Company

 Dave Daly, “K” Line

 Claudio Bozzo, Mediterranean Shipping Company

 Al Gebhardt, Maersk Line

11:15 AM Motor Carrier/Trucking

 Shirley Roebuck, Gilco Trucking 

 Gerry Coyle, Evans Delivery Company 

 Hector Alvarez, Owner Operator 

 Wayne Gaumer, Lightning Transportation 

11:45 AM Chassis 

 Bernard Vaughan, Flexi-Van Leasing 

 Bill Shea, Direct ChassisLink, Inc. 

 Keith Lovetro, TRAC Intermodal

 David Manning, NACPC 

 Jon Poelma, Consolidated Chassis Management, LLC

12:30 PM Labor 

 Larry Bachtell, ILA 

 Mike Vigneron, ILA 

1:00 PM Lunch/ Roundtable Discussion (invite only)

Shippers

 Mark Jensen, Target 

 Bryan Most, Walmart 

 Dean Tracy, Lowe’s 

 Lori S. Smith, Johnson & Johnson Sales and Logistics, LLC.

Roundtable Discussion

 Truck gate/wait times

 Trucker gate “Appointment” system

 “Free time” operational impacts on gate operations and congestion

 Chassis ownership and deployment -“gray pool” development

 Ocean carrier arrival “bunching” impacts on port/gate congestion

 Infrastructure

 Measures already taken to address identified issues

3:30 PM Open Public Comments

5:45 PM Closing Remarks

6:00 PM End