UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549




FORM 10-K




ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES


EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010




Commission File No. 000-50983




SkyShop Logistics, Inc.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


NEVADA
27-0005846(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)
Identification No.)7805 NW 15th StreetMiami, Florida
33126(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)




(305) 599-1812


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)




Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None




Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share




Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.


Yes o   No x




Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.


Yes o   No x




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x   No o




Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filed, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated file
o
Accelerated filer
oNon-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
x




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o   No x


The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $10,547,656 at the closing price of $0.13 on June 30, 2010. As of January 31, 2011, the number of outstanding shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, of the registrant was120,168,223




shares.




No documents are incorporated by reference.










Table of Contents


1st Page
Filing SubmissionPart IItem 1
Business

3Item 1A
Risk Factors

8Item 1B
Unresolved Staff Comments

11Item 2
Properties

11Item 3
Legal Proceedings

11Item 4.
Removed and Reserved

11Part IIItem 5
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities

11Item 6.
Selected Financial Data

12Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

12Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

19Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

19Item 9.
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting and Financial Disclosure

19Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures

19Item 9B.
Other Information

20Part IIIItem 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

21Item 11.
Executive Compensation

22Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

24Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

24Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services

24Part IVItem 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

25Exhibits31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer32.1
Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)


2




Forward Looking Statements




Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Report, words such as “may,” “should,” “seek,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “strategy” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements regarding events, conditions and financial trends that may affect the Company’s future plans, operations, business strategies, operating results and financial position. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results, trends, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry trends and results, to differ materially from the future results, trends, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.




These risks and uncertainties include, among others: general economic and business conditions in the United States and other countries in which the Company’s customers, suppliers, and service providers are located; industry conditions and trends; technology changes; competition and other factors which may affect prices which the Company may charge for its products and its profit margins; the availability and cost of the inventory purchased by the Company; relative value of the United States dollar to currencies in the countries in which the Company’s customers, suppliers and competitors are located; changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulation, principally environmental regulations; the Company’s ability to implement changes in its business strategies and development plans; the availability, terms and deployment of debt and equity capital if needed for expansion and those factors set forth under “Risk Factors” below. These and certain other factors are discussed in this Report and from time to time in other Company reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated or circumstances as of the date of such statements.




PART I




ITEM 1




Business




On July 16, 2010, SkyPostal Networks, Inc., a Nevada corporation, changed its name to SkyShop Logistics, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”)  to better describe the repositioning of its primary operations to that of an international e-commerce service company.  Through its trademarked name “PuntoMio,” the Company is engaged in cross border shopping facilitation by providing services to non-U.S. based shoppers accessing U.S. online merchant sites.  The service provides a U.S. address address in which clients can receive their US online purchases.  PuntoMio also makes available a cost calculator which estimates the cost of shipping, customs and delivery for the buyer.    Online merchants wishing to sell to international buyers can eliminate the risks associated with foreign sales by utilizing the Company’s Global e-Cart solutions and delivering the purchase to a U.S. address. The Company’s subsidiary, SkyPostal, Inc., provides international, bar-coded, low cost distribution of catalogs, books and publications below United States Postal Service (“USPS”) costs with track and trace visibility.  The Company relies on its own proprietary integrated delivery network consisting of commercial and cargo airlines, customs brokers, local private postal services and delivery companies linked by its PosTrac mail and parcel tracking system.




PuntoMio, is a cross border internet shopping facilitator that enables non-U.S. based online buyers to use PuntoMio as their mailing address for U.S. e-commerce websites. PuntoMio launched its first website, www.puntomio.com, in October 2008 where it facilitates shopping on U.S. merchant websites by providing the “landed cost”, customs clearance and delivery cost, upfront to the shopper. PuntoMio assists the buyers in finding products, price comparison, use of the U.S. address, transportation and customs clearance and delivery to the buyer’s home. It is a less costly alternative to the express carriers and more efficient than the international parcel post service offered by the world’s national postal services. PuntoMio provides secure, online track and trace of the parcel until delivery has taken place to the buyer at their home or office.




The Company’s international mail and parcel network delivers services to over 50 major countries in Latin America ,Caribbean, Europe, Eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa. The Company is in the process of developing a Far East outsourced parcel delivery network. The Company provides a door-to-door service largely using outsourced transportation via international commercial airlines and local in-country delivery companies, private postal services and national postal services in some countries. The Company generates revenue based on the tonnage of mail and parcels delivered, measured in kilograms, based on the distance to deliver, contract terms for committed annual tonnage or service and volume discounts. The Company manages its business based on where the mail originates, the source of the mail and the ultimate destination. The Company leverages its mail tonnage to provide PuntoMio customers discounted line haul and delivery rates.




Based in Miami, Florida, the Company is the largest private mail network in the Latin American-Caribbean (LAC) region, handling mail and parcels from U.S. and European postal administrations, mail consolidators, major publishers, international mailers, e-tailers and financial institutions that require time-defined and reliable delivery of their mail, including magazines, catalogs and parcels. The Company provides internet merchants the ability to expand their markets internationally without the inherent risks of shipping parcel post to foreign buyers or the use of expensive express couriers.




3




The Company operates facilities in Miami, FL, Philadelphia, PA and Bogota, Colombia for the sorting and consolidating of mail and parcels for shipment to various countries in Latin America, Europe Middle East and Africa. It outsources its operation in Philadelphia. The facilities in Philadelphia  and Bogota,  provide the Company with certain competitive advantages with respect to faster delivery times to Latin America and also lower sorting and handling costs in the case of the Bogota hub. The Company outsources its mail sorting requirement to a private facility in London, which processes mail originating in Europe and bound for Latin America.




By combining its expertise in international logistics, outsourced network of in-country private postal services, and PuntoMio’s landed cost technology, the Company is in a unique position to reliably deliver international mail and parcels in a time defined period to the ultimate recipient in Latin America, Europe, Middle East Eastern Europe and Africa, at costs substantially below express couriers and international postage rates of the origin country.




The Company uses over eighty suppliers, including airlines for line haul, national postal administrations, and other mail distribution companies. The delivery of international mail is regulated by treaty, the Universal Postal Convention, and by local laws in each country. The ways and methods by which the Company operates are limited in certain circumstances by these regulations.




Products




Business to Consumer International Parcel  Service


The international consumer has two options when it comes to the delivery of online purchases; courier express which is reliable but expensive, and a postal option which is inexpensive but generally offers no track and trace capabilities. The postal option via the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) relies on the foreign national posts that do not have track and trace capability. Many of the Company’s postal consolidator clients distribute orders for some of the largest online merchants like Amazon and Barnes & Noble using the low cost postal option. The Company’s international parcel service is an alternative to sometimes unreliable foreign postal delivery services. It is priced as a postal product but serviced as a courier product with online visibility, tracking and delivery confirmation. The service is time defined with delivery completed in 4 to 8 days.




Landed Cost – Punto Mio Service


One of the biggest challenges facing U.S. online merchants selling to cross border shoppers is the lack of information on the total cost of an international purchase prior to completion of the purchase. Currently, the cross border online shopper is usually not familiar with the duties and taxes that they will have to pay for their purchase. The merchant does not provide this information and oftentimes the buyer has post purchase dissatisfaction due to the “sticker shock” surprise of customs duties and value added taxes that average about 30% of merchandise cost and in some countries as high as 100% of retail cost.




PuntoMio also provides various other features to the cross border buyer that further facilitate their shopping experience. PuntoMio offers a U.S. address, store and product recommendations, educational material such as relevant customs and shipping information by country, U.S. price comparison tool comparing merchant pricing and buyer ratings, and complete visibility and tracking of all purchases.




Merchant Solutions – Global e Cart


Global e Cart provides an integration free technology platform for online merchants allowing them to expand internationally without changing their technology or operational processes. This exclusively licensed technology allows localized checkout experience in both language and currency, localized checkout with local address formats, defined export/import restrictions and compliance by country, and international credit card fraud screening.   Global e Cart has launched a fully integrated landed cost solution for BrandsMart, a major Southeast U.S. retail merchant. It is currently in discussions with other major U.S. merchants to launch similar sites during 2011.




Sales and Marketing




In 2010, PuntoMio grew its client base primarily through social media, direct internet marketing and through its relationships with major banks who offer their credit card clients PuntoMio’s U.S. address facility as a value-added benefit. This value-added service enhances customer loyalty and retention for banks as well as provides them an additional revenue stream as their customers are more confident shopping on U.S. online merchant sites. PuntoMio has co-marketing partnerships with major regional banks such as Itau in Brazil, Santander in Argentina, Banamex in Mexico and other banks and financial institutions in Latin America, Europe and the Middle East.  PuntoMio has launched a private label service under the GlobalShop Brand for clients of American Express in Europe, the Middle East and Latin America.  During 2011, the program will be expanded worldwide to American Express partner banks. The Company markets its cross border private mail delivery service into Latin America and Caribbean as a wholesaler in Europe and the U.S. by soliciting business from European Postal Administrations and international mail consolidators who sell their international mailing service directly to the producers of the mail. The Company also markets its international mail delivery and distribution service on a retail basis directly to publishers, printers, financial institutions and direct marketers in Latin America through its local sales representatives and delivery service partners.




Intellectual Property




4




Our intellectual property includes trademarks related to our brands, products and services; trade secrets; and other intellectual property rights and licenses of various kinds. We seek to protect our intellectual property assets through trademark and other laws of the U.S. and other countries of the world, and through contractual provisions.




We consider the Company’s trademarks, including PuntoMio® and SkyPostal®, to be valuable to the Company and we have registered these trademarks in the U.S. and other countries throughout the world and aggressively seek to protect them.




Industry and Competition




International wholesale mail delivery is intensely competitive and includes the U.S. Postal Service and many of the postal administrations in Latin America, many wholesale companies that typically focus on specific markets, and smaller wholesalers that typically serve a single country. National postal administrations also provide similar services that compete with the Company.




The Company’s wholesale private postal service was affected by the current global economic downturn and the overall drop in mail volumes as experienced by the USPS. The decline in direct marketing and increased use of electronic media for online banking and migration of publications from hard copy to internet form have eroded the Company’s traditional mail business. As a consequence, the Company eliminated a large amount of low margin business by increasing pricing and has repositioned itself to take advantage of online retail delivery demand to Latin America, the Middle East and Europe from U.S. e-tailers through the international parcel product and PuntoMio initiatives.




The Company believes its future growth and business opportunity lie with persons using cross border online retail services.




A July 2009 PayPal article explained that the top three reasons online shoppers abandon their carts are high shipping charges, desire to comparison shop, and lack of funds. PuntoMio merchants solution resolves these obstacles by calculating the total landed cost for the customer upfront, offering lower shipping cost via the international parcel service, and giving the option to comparison shop with online tools such as PriceGrabber. PuntoMio is designed to be the only website an international shopper needs to facilitate all their online purchases from U.S. e-tailers. The Company provides its partners and e-tailers all they need to successfully launch an international shopping service, including consistent promotional offers to existing customers to promote year-round shopping and product expansion.




The logistics solutions industry is fragmented at this time. There is no single e-commerce business to consumer “landed cost” logistics solution that has a dominant position for both business and consumer. This gives PuntoMio an opportunity to build on its competitive strengths, including its brand awareness, banking and e-Merchant relationships, and its extensive low cost parcel delivery network and customer service capability, to emerge as an industry leader within its target business to cross border shoppers visiting U.S. merchant websites. PuntoMio is the only significant provider of e-commerce logistic landed cost solution with comprehensive Latin American coverage especially in the three key markets of Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina.


5


Potential competitors such as FedEx, UPS, and DHL have significantly greater financial, technological and managerial resources and greater name recognition than the Company. Many of these companies are better capitalized than the Company, which may enable them to increase market share in periods of economic downturn and higher petroleum prices. At this time, competition from these major couriers is not significant because they do not target the home delivery and customs complexities for United States merchants and cross border online shoppers. Furthermore, Management believes that the major couriers tend to avoid consumer accounts because the market is too small to justify entry and costs of delivering to international residential areas are relatively high, especially into Latin America. However, competition from major couriers may become more significant as the volume of e-commerce and related deliveries grow.




Employees




At December 31, 2010, the Company had 34 employees, of which 23 were based in the U.S. and the balance were based internationally. Those based abroad assist the Company with sales, clearance and deliveries and a few are dedicated to IT work such as routine programming needs for the Company.




Corporate History and Recent Developments




On April 15, 2008, Omega United, Inc. (“Omega”) entered into and closed an agreement concerning the exchange of securities between Omega and SkyPostal, Inc. and its security holders (the “Securities Exchange”). Pursuant to the Securities Exchange, Omega issued 29,000,000 shares of common stock for all of the issued and outstanding common stock of SkyPostal. On July 25, 2008, Omega changed its name to SkyPostal Networks, Inc. (the “Company”). Prior to the Securities Exchange Agreement, Omega had no significant operations, assets or liabilities. Prior to the 2008 Securities Agreement, SkyPostal, Inc. conducted substantially the same business and management as after the agreement.




On February 27, 2009, the Company acquired seventy percent of the common stock of Logistics Enterprises, Ltda (“LEL”), a Colombian company engaged in retail mail distribution and related activities. The acquisition of LEL was a strategic acquisition to lower operating costs, shorten delivery times to Latin America, consolidate greater tonnage and thereby achieve better line haul rates and generally improve the Company’s competitiveness in the Latin American market. LEL’s operating facility in the customs Free Zone near Bogota’s International Airport has become a principal sorting and handling facility and has replaced a significant amount of the sorting capacity at the Miami facility. Using the Bogota facility provides the Company with lower rental and labor costs. The combination of facilities in Philadelphia and Bogota allows the Company to deliver mail originating in the U.S. approximately two days faster than competitors. Bringing South America bound tonnage to Bogota allows the Company to consolidate a greater percentage of its freight and thereby achieve lower line haul costs to most markets in South America.




During the third quarter of 2009, the Company sold Units at $1.00 per unit in a private placement. The Units were comprised of one preferred share of PuntoMio, the Company’s subsidiary, plus one warrant to purchase one share of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.10 per share expiring on July 1, 2012. The Company sold 1,090,000 Units for proceeds of $966,021, net of placement fees.




Effective April 30, 2010, the Company entered into an equity exchange with the preferred stock holders of PuntoMio (“PuntoMio Exchange”).  The Company exchanged eight shares of convertible preferred stock of the Company for each share of PuntoMio preferred stock.  Simultaneously with the PuntoMio Exchange, the Company redeemed warrants to acquire 1,090,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $109,000.  As a result of the Company owns all of the outstanding PuntoMio preferred stock.




In March 2010, the Company issued a note payable for $100,000 at 18% annual interest convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.10 per share. The note was paid in full on May 20, 2010.




In March 2010, the Company issued 2% notes totaling $402,000. These notes were convertible into the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.05 per share.  In April 2010, the Company issued 2% notes totaling $95,000 convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.05 per share.  These convertible notes were issued with warrants to purchase up to 1,988,000 shares of the Company‘s common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share expiring on March 15, 2011.  In May 2010, the holders of these notes converted the notes into 10,667,527 shares of the Company’s common stock.  As of December 31, 2010, all of the warrants remain outstanding.




On May 19, 2010, the Company issued a $2.26 million convertible note maturing on May 19, 2013 that bears interest at an annual rate of 3% payable monthly beginning on June 1, 2010.  The loan proceeds were used to pay off certain loan obligations, trade payables and expenses.  The balance of the proceeds were used to support the development of PuntoMio.  Principal and accrued interest on the note are convertible at any time at the option of the note holder into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.05 per share.  In conjunction with the convertible debt agreements, the Company issued warrants to acquire 9,040,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share expiring May 19, 2013.  The exercise price is adjustable in the event of any stock split, stock dividend or other recapitalization of the Company.  These warrants contain a cashless exercise feature.




In May 2010, the Company paid placement fees related to issuance of the 3% $2.26 million convertible note by issuing a $316,400  convertible note maturing on May 19, 2013 that bears interest at an annual rate of 3% payable monthly beginning on June 1, 2010.   Principal and accrued interest on the note are convertible at any time at the option of the note holder into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.05 per share.  In conjunction with the issuance, the Company issued warrants to acquire 1,265,600 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share expiring May 19, 2013.  The exercise price is adjustable in the event of any stock split, stock dividend or other recapitalization of the Company.  These warrants contain a cashless exercise feature.




6




On May 7, 2010, the Company issued a senior secured convertible note for net proceeds of $150,000 to serve as a bridge loan in anticipation of the 3% $2.26 million convertible note.  This note was convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $0.05 per share.  On May 20, 2010, the Company paid the convertible note in full with proceeds from the $2.26 million financing.




On November 9, 2010, the Company issued a $25,000 note maturing on November 9, 2013, that bears interest at an annual rate of 3% payable monthly beginning on December 1, 2010.  Principal and accrued interest for this note are convertible at any time at the option of the note holder into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.05 per share.  In conjunction with the issuance, the Company issued warrants to acquire 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share expiring November 9, 2013.  The exercise price is adjustable in the event of any stock split, stock dividend or other recapitalization of the Company.  These warrants contain a cashless exercise feature.




In November 2010, the Company commenced a private placement for the sale of common stock and warrants of the Company (the “2010 Private Placement”). The Company received proceeds of $1,008,900 net of placement fees totaling $95,100 paid in 2010 and $17,000 paid in 2011, for the subscription of 22,420,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 4,484,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share.  The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $1,121,000 to the common stock and warrants based on their relative fair values.  $791,586 of the total proceeds were allocated to the common stock, which are included in Subscribed stock on the consolidated balance sheets of the Company’s financial statements.  $329,414 of the gross proceeds were allocated to the warrants and charged to additional paid in capital.  The Company received $1,036,000 of the gross proceeds in 2010.  The Company received $85,000 of the gross proceeds in 2011 which are included in Subscriptions receivable on the consolidated balance sheets of the Company’s financial statements.  The proceeds from the 2010 Private Placement will be used to support the development of the Company’s subsidiary, PuntoMio.




In November 2010 the Company entered into a strategic partnership with BrandsMart USA, one of the largest per-store-volume retailers in the United States.  BrandsMartUSA is now expanding its cross-border online shopping capability to customers in Latin America and the Caribbean through its strategic partnership with PuntoMio.  With this new service, consumers accessing www.BrandsMartUSA.com from Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Peru, Bahamas, Puerto Rico, and other countries are directed to the BrandsMart USA international website, through integration with PuntoMio.  Customers will see products displayed in local currency and the purchase price will include transportation to their country, duties, taxes, and delivery within 5 to 8 days of purchase.




In November 2010, the Company entered into a strategic alliance with Banamex, one of the largest banks in Mexico, that will offer the PuntoMio service to over 1.5 million Banamex clients.  This alliance will provide Banamex clients with the easiest and most reliable way to shop from U.S. e-tailers.  Upon registering at www.puntomio.com/banamex, each client will receive a PuntoMio address in the U.S. where they can receive their online orders, which are subsequently delivered to their home or office in Mexico.  Clients will have access to over 1.7 million online stores, catalogs and shopping portals in the United States without having to leave their homes in Mexico.




In December 2010, the Company entered into a strategic alliance with HSBC Bank A.S., which serves Turkey with a full range of banking products and services that will offer the Company’s GlobeBox service to over 2.4 million HSBC credit cardholders  in Turkey.  This alliance will provide HSBC credit cardholders with the easiest and most reliable way to shop from U.S. e-tailers.  Upon registering at www.globebox.net/HSBC each client will receive an address in the U.S. in which they can receive all of their online orders which are subsequently delivered to their home or office in Turkey.  HSBC credit cardholders will have access to over 1.7 million online stores, catalogs and shopping portals in the United States without having to leave their homes in Turkey.




Management Plans




Management is constantly seeking opportunities to lower operating and administrative costs, increase revenue, and achieve positive cash flows from operations and profitability, including the following initiatives achieved in the twelve months ended December 31, 2010:




●
Repositioning of the Company’s core focus from low margin mail distribution to the provision of higher margin shopping facilitation services to foreign consumers and U.S. merchants.




●
Increased investment in its PuntoMio’s e-commerce technology, foreign co-marketing banking relationships, internet marketing and international parcel service to foreign shoppers and U.S. online merchants.




7




●
Repositioning its sales strategy by focusing efforts on generating higher margin international retail sales from and to Latin American countries.


ITEM 1A.
Risk Factors







Current and potential shareholders should consider carefully the risk factors described below.  Any of these factors, or others, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, could negatively affect our gross revenues, profitability or cash flows in the future.  The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties may also adversely impair the Company’s business operations. Such factors may have a significant impact on its business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. As a result of the identified risk factors, actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company, or that are currently considered to be immaterial, may also impact the Company’s business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. If any such risks materialize, the Company’s business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, the trading price of the Company’s stock could decline.




Risks Related to the Company




As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses from operations and as of December 31, 2010 had an accumulated deficit of $28,355,320.  As of December 31, 2010, the Company’s current liabilities exceeded its current assets by approximately $637,242.  Cash flows from operations has been negative for each quarter of 2010 and 2009.  The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has concluded that these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, as shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company is exploring several alternatives for debt and equity capital but there can be no assurances that these efforts will be successful. Management has taken measures to lower operating and administrative costs and increase revenues in an effort to reduce the current negative cash flows from operations. These measures include payroll reduction, deferral of salary for senior executives, implementation of programs to increase efficiency of sorting operations, and curtailment of general expenses. It is not expected that the efforts to lower operating and administrative costs will be sufficient to achieve a positive cash flows during the next twelve months.




The Company relies on its relationships with major state-owned and private postal operators and cannot be assured that these relationships will be sustained, in which event its revenue and any profitability would be reduced. The Company has agreements with government postal services, such as La Poste, the French postal service, to deliver commercial mail into the Latin American Caribbean region. The Company also delivers mail to the Latin American-Caribbean Region (“LAC”) for a number of large international mail consolidators. The agreements may generally be cancelled on 30 days notice and do not require any minimum quantities of mail to be delivered. There can be no guarantee that the level of future mail to be delivered from current clients will continue. A material decrease in tonnage from any of the Company’s major mailers, or the loss of any of its larger clients, would reduce its revenue and related profitability. In addition, to the extent that new clients are added, whether following the loss of existing clients or otherwise, the Company may incur substantial start-up expenses in initiating services to new clients.




The Company’s growth is dependent on its ability to grow its subsidiary PuntoMio and increase its parcel business. To the extent that its customer base and its services continue to grow, this growth will place a significant demand on its managerial, administrative, operational and financial resources. Future performance and results of operations will depend in part on its ability to successfully implement enhancements to its business management systems and to adapt those systems as necessary to respond to changes in the business.  In October 2010, the Company contracted with a consulting firm to plan and install an Enterprise Resource Planning system (ERP) The estimated cost to install the ERP system is $535,000 which will be incurred over the next 36 months. The ERP system will assist management in managing the projected growth in PuntoMio.




The Company’s success is largely dependent on the skills, experience and efforts of Albert P. Hernandez, its Chief Executive Officer, and other key executive officers. The loss of one or more of the Company’s executive officers could have a material adverse effect upon its growth strategy and future business development, and therefore the value of your investment. The Company maintains a key man life insurance policy on Mr. Albert P. Hernandez. Additionally, any failure to attract and retain qualified employees in the future could also negatively impact the Company’s business strategy.




Negative economic and political developments in LAC may reduce the Company’s revenue and delay any profitability. A large portion of the Company’s services are completed in LAC. As a result, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and business may be negatively affected by the general condition of LAC’s regional economy, any devaluation of local currencies as compared to the U.S. dollar, as well as inflation, interest rates, regulation, taxation, social instability and other political, social and economic developments in the LAC region. Any of these events could reduce its revenue and delay any profitability.




Currency fluctuations or the devaluation and depreciation of local currencies could limit the Company’s ability to convert those currencies into U.S. dollars or reduce the amount of U.S. dollars received upon currency conversions. The Company bills certain of its European customers in U.S. dollars and incurs operating expenses in British Pounds and some LAC currencies such as the Brazilian Real.




8




Severe devaluation or depreciation of the currencies of countries in the LAC region may also result in governmental intervention, as in Venezuela, or disruption of international foreign exchange markets. This may limit the Company’s ability to transfer or convert those currencies into U.S. dollars and other currencies. To the extent that a foreign government institutes restrictive exchange control policies in the future, the Company’s ability to transfer or convert foreign currencies into U.S. dollars may be limited.




The price of crude oil steadily increased from 2002 to mid 2008, and most dramatically during the second quarter of 2008. The price of crude increased from approximately $90 per barrel in January 2008 to approximately $140 per barrel in July 2008. Between July 2008 and February 2010 the price of crude generally decreased to $77 before gradually increasing to $89 in December 31, 2010 according to the Energy Information Administration. Increases in crude oil prices affect the worldwide transportation industry, including the Company’s key air and ground delivery service providers. The Company believes that its cost of line haul will continue to increase if petroleum prices rise, that it may not be able to pass on a portion or all of these costs to its customers and that the margin between revenue and delivery cost per kilogram may decline. Any of these outcomes may negatively affect profitability, the ability of the Company to cover its fixed expenses, cash flows, earnings per share and the price of the Company’s stock.




Risks Relating to the Company’s Securities




Insiders have substantial control over the Company, and they could delay or prevent a change in its corporate control even if its other stockholders wanted it to occur. Accordingly, these insiders may be able to control all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This could delay or prevent an outside party from acquiring or merging with the Company.




The Company needs to raise additional funds in the future. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of the current stockholders of the Company will be reduced, stockholders may experience additional dilution and such securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of the common stock and may have covenants that impose restrictions on the Company’s operations. In addition, the Company has 19,074,766 warrants to purchase common stock outstanding, which if exercised, could dilute existing stockholders’ rights. Finally, the Company has awarded 1,650,000 shares of common stock to non-executive employees and directors subject to vesting schedules in each award agreement.




If the Company fails to remain current on its reporting requirements, it could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board which would limit the ability of broker dealers to sell its securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.




Companies trading on the OTC Bulletin Board must be reporting issuers under Sections 13 and 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and must be current in their reports under Section 13 in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board. If the Company fails to remain current on its reporting requirements, it could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board. As a result, the market liquidity for the Company’s securities could be severely affected and limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell the Company’s securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market. In addition, the Company may be unable to get re-listed on the OTC Bulletin Board, which may have an adverse material effect on the Company.




The Company’s common stock is subject to the penny stock regulations and restrictions, which impair the shares’ liquidity and make trading more difficult.


9


SEC Rule 15g-9, as amended, establishes the definition of a “penny stock” as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a limited number of exceptions. This classification adversely affects the market liquidity for the Company’s common stock.




The market price of the Company’s common stock will likely be highly volatile, as is the stock market in general, and the market for OTC Bulletin Board quoted stocks in particular. Some of the factors that may materially affect the market price of the Company’s common stock are beyond the Company’s control, such as changes in financial estimates by industry and securities analysts, announcements made by the Company’s competitors or sales of the Company’s common stock. These factors may have a material adverse affect on the market price of the Company’s common stock, regardless of the Company’s performance.




In addition, the public stock markets have experienced extreme price and trading volume volatility. This volatility has significantly affected the market prices of securities of many companies for reasons frequently unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock.




The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future, so any return on investment may be limited to the value of the Company’s stock. The Company plans to retain any future earnings to finance growth.




Future sales of the Company’s common stock may depress its stock price.




Sales of a substantial number of shares of the Company’s common stock by significant stockholders into the public market could cause a decrease in the market price of the Company’s common stock.


10


ITEM 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments




None.




ITEM 2.
Properties




Our Company’s headquarters is located in Miami, Florida and consists of 16,665 square feet of office and warehouse space. In July 2009, the Miami lease was extended until June 2015 and PuntoMio operations were consolidated into the headquarters facility. In Bogota, we lease facilities on a month-to-month basis.




Management believes that existing facilities are adequate to meet current requirements, and that suitable additional space will be available as needed to accommodate any further physical expansion of operations.




ITEM 3.
Legal Proceedings




The Company is not party to any legal proceedings. The Company may become a party to various claims, legal actions and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of Management, there were no matters that would have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2010.




PART II







ITEM 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities




Our common stock is listed on the Over-the-Counter (“OTC”) Bulletin Board under the symbol “SKPN.” Until April 2008 there was no public market in the Company’s securities. There has been a limited public trading market for our securities since then. At December 31, 2010, there were 95,083,179 common shares issued and 94,763,179 shares outstanding that were held by approximately 268 stockholders of record. The following table sets forth the high and low closing sales prices for our common stock as quoted by OTC Bulletin Board for the periods indicated:




Year

Quarter Ended

Stock PriceHigh


Low2010

March 31, 2010

$
0.10


$
0.07June 30, 2010

$
0.15


$
0.07September 30, 2010

$
0.15


$
0.10December 31, 2010

$
0.11


$
0.062009

March 31, 2009


0.34


$
0.34June 30, 2009

$
0.10


$
0.10September 30, 2009

$
0.15


$
0.12December 31, 2009

$
0.10


$
0.10




Such quotes reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown, or commissions.  Such quotes are not necessarily representative of actual transactions and may not be based on any recognized criteria of securities valuation used in the investment banking community.




Dividend Policy




We have not paid dividends on our common stock and do not plan to pay such dividends in the foreseeable future. Our Board of Directors will determine our future dividend policy on the basis of many factors, including results of operations, capital requirements, and general business conditions.




Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities




During the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, we have sold securities exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) in reliance upon the exemptions provided in Section 4(2) and Rule 506,  and also in transactions with non-U.S. persons outside of the United States.





On March 8 2010, the Company issued a note payable with a face amount of $100,000 for proceeds of $97,000.  The note payable was convertible into common stock of the Company at a conversion rate of $0.10 per share and was repaid during May 2010.





In March and April 2010, the Company issued convertible notes with an aggregate principal amount of $497,000 and warrants to acquire 1,988,000 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $497,000. The notes were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at $.05 per share.   The warrants were exercisable at $0.05 per share and expired unexercised on March 15, 2011.  In May 2010, holders of the $497,000 principal amount of convertible notes elected to convert the principal plus accrued interest of $1,483 into 9,969,651 shares of common stock at the $0.05 conversion price.  On May 20, 2010, the Company issued 697,876 shares of common stock upon conversion of these notes valued at $55,830 based on the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on that date.  These shares were deemed to be placement fees related to the sale of convertible notes.  In total, 10,667,527 shares of common stock were issued for the $497,000 convertible debt.




11





On May 7 2010, the Company issued a $150,000 convertible note. The note was convertible into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.05 per share and was repaid in May 2010.





On May 18 2010, the Company issued $2,576,400 3% senior secured convertible notes and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 10,305,600 shares of common stock for proceeds of $2,260,000.  The notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a of $.05 and the warrants are exercisable at $0.15 per share expiring on May 19, 2013.





In November 2010, the Company issued a $25,000 note maturing on November 9, 2013 that bears interest at an annual rate of 3% payable monthly beginning on December 1, 2010.  The principal and accrued interest on this note are convertible at any time at the option of the note holder into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.05 per share.  The purchaser of the note was also issued a warrant to acquire an equivalent of 20% of the shares issuable upon conversion, or 100,000 shares with a strike price of $0.15 per share expiring November 9, 2013.




In November 2010, the Company commenced a private placement for the sale of common stock and warrants of the Company at $.05 per share (the “2010 Private Placement”). The Company received proceeds of $1,008,900 net of placement fees totaling $95,100 paid in 2010 and $17,000 paid in 2011, for the subscription of 22,420,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 4,484,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. $1,036,000 of the gross proceeds were received in 2010 and $85,000 was received in 2011.  The proceeds from the 2010 Private Placement will be used to support the development of the Company’s subsidiary, PuntoMio.




Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan




At December 31, 2010, under plans approved by the Board of Directors, the Company had outstanding to management, employees and directors restricted stock grants of common stock, as shown below.





Equity Compensation Plan Information


Plan Category

Number of

securities

to be issued exercise

of outstanding

options, warrants

and rights


Weighted-average

exercise price of

outstanding

options, warrants

and rigths


Number of securities remaining

available for future issuance

under equity compensation

plansEquity compensation plans approved by security holders


-



-



-Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders


1,650,000


$
-



554,754




Of the 1,650,000 shares to vest in 2011, 2012 and 2013, none are attributable to executive officers.  All 1,650,000 shares of common stock subject to vesting requirements have been issued, are included in the shares outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and are subject to forfeiture in the event vesting requirements are not met.




ITEM 6.
Selected Financial Data




Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.




ITEM 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




Introduction




You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K, and the special note on Forward-Looking Statements appearing before Item 1. Business. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and its plans of operation contain statements that are forward-looking. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions, which are subject to risk, uncertainties and other factors. Actual results may differ materially because of the factors discussed in the subsection titled “Risk Factors,” which are located in Item 1A.




Company Overview




The Company provides international, wholesale mail delivery services to 20 major countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, of which all of the countries would be classified as emerging markets. The Company also provides parcel delivery service to consumers living in Europe, Middle East, Eastern Europe and Africa. The Company provides a door-to-door service largely using outsourced transportation via international commercial airlines and local in-country delivery companies, private postal services and national postal services in some countries.




12




The Company operates facilities in Miami, FL and Bogota, Colombia for the sorting and consolidating of mail for shipment to specific countries in Latin America. The facilities in Bogota, in particular, provide the Company with certain competitive advantages with respect to faster delivery times to Latin America and also lower sorting and handling costs than in the U.S.  Management believes that faster delivery times provide a meaningful differential advantage with respect to the decision making of customers. The Company outsources its mail sorting facilities in Philadelphia and in London, which processes mail originating in Europe and bound for Latin America.




In October 2008, the Company activated PuntoMio, a subsidiary, to begin offering a service that enables non-U.S. resident internet shoppers to use PuntoMio as their mailing address for U.S. e-commerce websites. PuntoMio is a shopping facilitator for foreign online buyers which provides a U.S. address to use when making online purchases. This facilitates shopping on U.S. online merchant sites, wherein many e-tailers do not accept orders from foreign buyers. The PuntoMio service assists the buyers in finding products, price comparison, use of the U.S. address, transportation and customs clearance and delivery to the buyer’s home. It is a less costly alternative to the express carriers and more efficient than the international parcel post service offered by the world’s national postal services, since it provides a secured, online visibility of the parcel until delivery has taken place.





Given the conditions in international financial markets, which affect many companies, there can be no assurances of the Company’s ability to raise additional capital through the issuance of debt or equity securities in order to reduce or eliminate the continuing negative cash flows.





Issuance of Debt





As described in Item 1 - Business, and in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company issued various debt instruments during 2010 for net proceeds of $2,994,211.




Sale of Common Stock




As described in Item 1 - Business of Part I above, and in the accompanying consolidated financial statements,in 2010 the Company issued common stock and warrants for  net proceeds of $1,008,900




Results of Operations




The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the Consolidated Statements of Operations that are used in the following discussion.




13




Year Ended December 31,


Increase (Decrease)2010


2009


Amount


PercentNET REVENUES

$
7,624,092


$
8,285,737


$
(661,645
)


(8.0
%)OPERATING EXPENSES:Cost of delivery


6,167,940



7,038,584



(870,644
)


(12.4
%)General and administrative


3,936,125



4,196,529



(260,404
)


(6.2
%)Stock based compensation


247,998



258,865



(10,867
)


(4.2
%)TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES


10,352,063



11,493,978



(1,141,915
)


(9.9
%)OPERATING LOSS


(2,727,971
)


(3,208,241
)


480,270



(15.0
%)OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME):Interest


53,038



-



53,038Amortization of discounts


814,580



-



814,580Changes in excess value of put optionover the estimated fair value of shares


64,000



374,400



(310,400
)


(82.9
%)Provision for escrow deposit


-



149,975



(149,975
)Impairment losses


139,041



307,455



(168,414
)


(54.8
%)Other


184,108



299,087



(114,979
)


(38.4
%)TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)


1,254,767



1,130,917



123,850



11.0
%NET LOSS


(3,982,738
)


(4,339,158
)


356,420



(8.2
%)Net loss attributable to the non-controllinginterest


(100,567
)


(75,362
)


(25,205
)


33.4
%Loss attributable to the controlling interest


(3,882,171
)


(4,263,796
)


381,625



(9.0
%)Deemed dividend on convertible preferred stock


(798,333
)


-Net loss attributable to common shareholders

$
(4,680,504
)

$
(4,263,796
)

$
(416,708
)


9.8
%WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:Basic


81,748,353



65,356,429



16,391,924



25.1
%Effect of dilutive shares


-



-



-Diluted


81,748,353



65,356,429



16,391,924



25.1
%NET LOSS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TOCOMMON STOCKHOLDERSBasic and Diluted

$
(0.06
)

$
(0.07
)

$
(0.01
)


12.2
%




Revenue





The Company generates revenue on the tonnage of mail and parcels delivered, measured in kilograms plus service fees charged to non-U.S. based consumers for processing customs and duties and sales commissions earned from merchants.  Revenue during the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to the year ended December 31, 2009, decreased by 8.0% as a result of a 19.5% decrease in tonnage and a 5.6% decrease in revenue per ton.  The decrease in revenue per ton is a result of the discontinuation of our Postal Injection service during 2009.  Going forward, the Company is focused on maintaining and growing higher margin business specifically, mail and parcels originating in and arriving into Latin America. Management believes that overall industry mail tonnage will continue to decrease, while parcel volumes from the U.S into Europe, Middle East and  Latin America will increase due to general demand increase for U.S. products. Management believes this demand will drive the growth of fees earned from customs and duties processing, delivery and merchant fees.  In addition, Management believes that higher margin, e-commerce consumer business originating in Latin America, Europe and the Middle East will continue to increase as the Company continues to grow its consumer customer base through co-marketing agreements with banks and credit card issuers in those regions where the growth in cross-border shopping is greatest.  Revenue growth will also be generated from U.S. merchant agreements wherein the Company assumes the management of foreign shopper transactions that the merchants prefer to outsource.




The following schedule highlights the Company’s U.S. and foreign sourced revenues including the revenues of PuntoMio and, since March 1, 2009, LEL, for the years December 31, 2010 and 2009:




Twelve Months Ended December 31,


ChangePercent of





Percent ofRegion

2010


Total


2009


Total


Amount


PercentU.S.

$
3,377,632



44.3
%

$
4,258,115



51.4
%


(880,483
)


-20.7
%Foreign


4,246,460



55.7
%


4,027,622



48.6
%


218,838



5.4
%Total

$
7,624,092






$
8,285,737







(661,645
)


-15.2
%
 
 14
 
 Operating Expenses
  Cost of Delivery. Total cost of delivery decreased by 12.4% and the gross margin increased by 4.0% primarily as a result of renegotiated rates with key vendors compared to the same period in the prior year and the phase out of postal injection resulting in less postage expense.  The Company expects gross margin to improve in the next twelve months as the parcel business into Latin America, Europe, and the Middle East continues to grow.  The cost per kilogram will vary with the price of oil and the margin between revenue and delivery costs would be adversely affected by any significant increases in oil prices.
  General and Administrative. This expense decreased by $260,404 during the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to reductions in salaries and benefits of $171,471, audit expenses of $45,562 and rent, telephone, and utilities of $81,168.
  Other Expenses
 
 Interest. The Company had no interest-bearing debt during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009.The Company accrued $49,446 of interest expense related to various convertible debt agreements entered into during 2010 that did not exist in 2009.
 
 Revaluation of Put Option Liability. The Company’s expense resulting from the mark to market adjustment during the year ended December 31, 2010 was a loss of $64,000 compared to a loss of $374,400 for the year ended December 31, 2009.  The decrease was primarily due to the reclassification into equity and the discontinuance of mark to market accounting of a significant portion of the put option during 2010.  See Note 17 – Commitments and Contingencies in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
 
 Amortization of debt discounts.  The Company incurred $814,580 of non-cash expense resulting from the amortization of debt discounts related to the issuance of convertible debt and warrants during 2010.  See accompanying consolidated financial statements Note 11 – Convertible Debt for full discussion on all convertible debt.
 
 Other income and expenses, which consist of non-operating items such as depreciation, amortization and financing fees, decreased by $114,979 during the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to 2009.  In 2010, the Company was able to negotiate reduced payments to satisfy past due amounts and therefore recognized a $35,000 of gain from the write-off of trade payables.  The Company also recognized a foreign currency gain of $46,375 during 2010 compared to a loss of $14,518 in 2009.
 
 During 2010, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $139,041 related to the write-down of a non-compete agreement.
 
 Net Loss Attributable to the Non-Controlling Interest
 
 Net losses of $100,567 and $75,362 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, are the portion of earnings and losses attributable to the non-controlling shareholder in LEL, which holds a 30% common equity interest in LEL, and shareholders that held a 24.1% preferred equity interest in PuntoMio for the period through April 30, 2010.   The Company acquired a 70% interest in LEL effective March 1, 2009.  The change of the Company’s equity interest in PuntoMio from 100% to 75.9% occurred effective September 30, 2009 as a result of the third quarter capital raise for PuntoMio.  Effective April 30, 2010, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with the holders of the preferred equity interest in PuntoMio and at December 31, 2010, the Company held a 100% equity interest in PuntoMio.
 
 Deemed Dividend
 
 The Company recorded a non-cash deemed dividend of $798,333 in connection with the issuance of its convertible preferred stock in the exchange for preferred shares of its subsidiary, PuntoMio.
  Liquidity
  The Company’s primary recurring source of liquidity has been cash provided by financing activities.  Proceeds from sales of equity securities over the last two years have been used for the development of new products and services and for corporate working capital needs. For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2010, cash increased by $881,057 to $917,570, compared to $36,513 as of December 31, 2009.
  15




The following table summarizes the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows:
  Twelve Months Ended December 31Net cashed (used in) provided by by operating activities

2010


2009Operating activities

$
(2,569,979
)

$
(2,108,761
)Investing activities


(68,313
)


52,986Financing activities


3,492,714



1,789,468
  The cash used by operating activities in 2010 of $2.6 million was primarily due to the net loss incurred of $3.9 million adjusted for amortization of debt discounts, decrease in accounts receivable, decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, depreciation and amortization, and stock compensation expense of approximately $815,000, $278,000, $360,000, 193,000 and $248,000 respectively.
  The cash used by operating activities in 2009 of $2.1 million was primarily due to the net loss incurred of $4.3 million adjusted for decrease in intangibles and other assets, decrease in accounts receivable, revaluation of the put option liability, and stock compensation expense of approximately $216,000, $433,000, $374,000 and $259,000 respectively.
  The cash used by investing activities in 2010 was primarily due to purchases of computers, software and other fixed assets totaling $67,579 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.
  The cash provided by investing activities in 2009 was due to cash on the balance sheet from the acquisition of LEL of $11,753, collection of amounts advanced to stockholder of $60,395 less purchases of computers and other fixed assets totaling $19,162.
  The cash provided by financing activities in 2010 was due to proceeds of approximately $2,994,000 from the issuance of convertible debt and proceeds of $1,036,000 from subscriptions of common stock less a $250,000 repayment of convertible notes and $109,000 paid for the redemption of warrants.
  The cash provided by financing activities in 2009 was primarily due to the Company’s private placements of equity securities (see Private Placements below).
  Financial Condition
  As of December 31, 2010, the Company had $2,601,400 of convertible debt outstanding, all of which matures in 2013, approximately $918,000 of cash on hand, a working capital deficit of $637,242, and an accumulated deficit of $28,355,320.
 
 Private Placements
  In 2009, the Company completed the sale of 9,630,000 shares of common stock at $.10 per share from which it received net proceeds of $836,443.  The proceeds from the sale were used to support the development of the Company’s PuntoMio subsidiary.
  During the third quarter of 2009, the Company sold 1,080,000 units at $1.00 per unit in a private placement. The units were comprised of one preferred share of PuntoMio, the Company’s subsidiary, and one warrant to purchase one share of common stock of the Company, at an exercise price of $0.10 per share expiring July 1, 2012. The Company received proceeds of $966,021 net of placement fees.
  Effective April 30, 2010, the Company entered into an equity exchange with the preferred interest holders of PuntoMio (“PuntoMio Exchange”).  The Company exchanged eight shares of convertible preferred stock of the Company for each share of PuntoMio preferred stock.  Simultaneous with the PuntoMio Exchange, the Company bought back or redeemed warrants to acquire 1,090,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $109,000.  As a result of the PuntoMio Exchange there is no longer a non-controlling interest in PuntoMio.  Prior to the PuntoMio Exchange,the allocation of the equity interest was 75.9% to SkyPostal Networks, Inc. and 24.1% to the PuntoMio preferred stockholders.
  In November 2010, the Company commenced a private placement of a maximum of $1,200,000 million through the sale of common stock and warrants of the Company (the “2010 Private Placement”). The Company received net proceeds of $1,008,900 net of placement fees of $95,100 paid in 2010 and $17,000 paid in 2011, for the sale of 22,420,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 4,484,000 shares of common stock for an exercise price of $0.15 per share The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $1,121,000 to the common stock and warrants based on their relative fair values.  $791,586 of the total proceeds were allocated to the common stock, which are included in Subscribed stock on the consolidated balance sheets of the Company’s financial statements.  $329,414 of the gross proceeds were allocated to the warrants and charged to additional paid in capital.  The Company received $1,036,000 of the gross proceeds in 2010.  The Company received $85,000 of the gross proceeds in 2011 which are included in Subscriptions receivable on the consolidated balance sheets of the Company’s financial statements. The proceeds from the 2010 Private Placement will be used to support the development of the Company’s subsidiary, PuntoMio.
  Capital Expenditures
  In 2010, capital expenditures totaled $67,579. In 2009, capital expenditures totaled $19,162.
  Critical Accounting Policies
  16
  Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operation is based upon our consolidated audited financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
 
 An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur, could materially impact the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the following critical accounting policies reflect the more significant estimates and assumption used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
  Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board. In addition, there are other items within our consolidated financial statements that require estimation, but are not deemed critical as defined above. Changes in estimates used in these other items could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
  Principles of Consolidation
  The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SkyShop Logistics, Inc. and all entities in which the Company has a controlling voting interest (“subsidiaries”) required to be consolidated in accordance with U.S. GAAP (collectively referred to as “the Company”).  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between have been eliminated in consolidation.
  Business Combinations
  Effective March 1, 2009, the Company acquired 70% of the outstanding common stock of LEL. The acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method. The acquisition method is required to be used on all events where a business obtains control over another business. The acquisition method establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interests in the acquiree, and goodwill acquired in a business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase. The consolidated financial information presented includes the accounts of LEL as of March 1, 2009. See Note 5- Business Combinations. See Non-controlling Interests accounting policy below.
  Loss Per Share
  Basic loss per share is presented on the face of the consolidated statements of operations. Basic loss per share is calculated as the loss attributable to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period. Basic loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Due to the Company’s losses from continuing operations, dilutive potential common shares in the form of warrants and unvested common stock awards were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as inclusion would be anti-dilutive for the periods presented.
  Use of Estimates
  The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates and assumptions impact, among others, the following: the amount of uncollectible accounts receivable, the amount to be paid for the settlement of liabilities related to cost of sales, the estimated useful lives for property and equipment, value assigned to the warrants granted in connection with the various financing arrangements, calculation for stock compensation expense and estimating future cash flows from, and the fair value of, intangible assets for impairment measurement purposes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
 Fair Value Measurements
  The Company has determined the estimated fair value amounts presented in these consolidated financial statements using available market information and appropriate methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The estimates presented in the consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. See Consolidated Financial Statements Note 13- Fair Value Measurements.
 
 Non-controlling Interests
  In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance that changed the accounting and reporting for non-controlling interests, which is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. The guidance was effective for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, for the Company and requires retroactive adoption of its presentation and disclosure requirements. The guidance requires the Company to report net income attributable to the non-controlling interests separately on the face of the consolidated statements of operation. Additionally, the guidance requires that the portion of equity in the entity not attributable to the Company be reported within equity, separately from the Company’s equity on the consolidated balance sheets. The adoption did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flow.
  17
  The 30% non-controlling interest in the LEL was accounted for in accordance with the acquisition method.The Company reported the non-controlling interest in the consolidated financial statements as required by U.S. GAAP. The determination of the fair value of the non-controlling interest due to the acquisition of LEL is described in Consolidated Financial Statements Note 5-Business Combinations.
 
 On September 30, 2009, the Company sold a 24.1% preferred equity interest in its wholly-owned subsidiary, PuntoMio, and Company warrants for cash proceeds of $966,021.  Effective April 30, 2010, the Company entered into an equity exchange (“PuntoMio Exchange”) with the preferred share holders of PuntoMio.  The Company exchanged eight preferred convertible shares of the Company for every one PuntoMio preferred share.  Simultaneously with the PuntoMio Exchange, the Company bought back or redeemed 1,090,000 warrants for $109,000.  As a result of the PuntoMio Exchange, there is no longer a non-controlling interest in PuntoMio as of December 31, 2010.  The ownership percentage of the non-controlling interest in LEL has not changed.
  Software Product Development Costs
  Software product development costs incurred prior to reaching technological feasibility are expensed. We have determined that technological feasibility of the software is not established until substantially all product development is complete.
  Revenue Recognition and Cost of Delivery
  Revenue is recognized upon receipt and verification of mail and parcel weight and destination by country.
  Cost of delivery is comprised of air and ground line haul costs, clearance costs, postage, hand delivery costs and recognized when incurred.
  This method generally results in recognition of revenues and purchased transportation costs earlier than methods that do not recognize revenues until a proof of delivery is received or that recognize revenues as progress on the transit is made. The company’s method of revenue and cost recognition does not result in a material difference from amounts that would be reported under such other methods.
  Currency Translation Policy
  The local currency is the functional currency for LEL, the Company’s operation located in Colombia. For foreign currency functional locations, assets and liabilities are translated to the U.S. dollar at end-of-period rates, while revenues and expenses are translated at average rates in effect during the period. Equity is translated at historical rates and the resulting cumulative translation adjustments are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
  Contingencies
  The Company accrues for contingent obligations, including legal costs, when the obligation is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. As facts concerning contingencies become known we reassess our position and make appropriate adjustments to the consolidated financial statements. Estimates that are particularly sensitive to future changes include those related to tax, legal, and other regulatory matters that are subject to change as events evolve and additional information becomes available.
  New Pronouncements
  Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 105-10, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — Overall(“ASC 105-10”). ASC 105-10 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification(the “Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Rules and interpretive releases of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. In August 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to guidance on fair value measurements and disclosure. The updated guidance clarifies that the fair value of a liability can be measured in relation to the quoted price of the liability when the liability trades as an asset in an active market, without adjusting the price for restrictions that prevent the transfer of the liability. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after August 31, 2009. The Company does not expect the update to have an effect on the valuation techniques used by the Company for measuring liabilities at fair value.
  18
 
 In January 2010, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that clarifies that the decrease-in-ownership provisions of the consolidation guidance of the Codification apply to: (1) a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity, (2) a subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture, and (3) an exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for a noncontrolling interest in an entity (including an equity method investee or joint venture). The update also clarifies that the decrease in ownership guidance on accounting for decreases in ownership of a subsidiary does not apply if the transaction is a sale of in-substance real estate or conveyance of oil and properties. This update is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 with retrospective application required for the first period of adoption of the consolidation guidance in the Codification. The Company adopted the amendment upon issuance with no material impact to its financial position or results of operations.
 
 In January 2010, the FASB issued an accounting standard update on fair value measurements and disclosures. The update requires more robust disclosures about (1) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (4) the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. This update is not expected to have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
  ITEM 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
  Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
  ITEM 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
  See Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules in Item 15 below.
  ITEM 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
  None.
  ITEM 9A.
Controls and Procedures
  (a)           Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
  We carried out an evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Exchange Act under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.
 
 Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring that (i) information required to be disclosed in an issuer’s reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and (ii) information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
  The evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures included a review of our objectives and processes and effect on the information generated for use in this Report. This type of evaluation is done quarterly so that the conclusions concerning the effectiveness of these controls can be reported in our periodic reports filed with the SEC. We intend to maintain these controls as processes that may be appropriately modified as circumstances warrant.
  Based on their evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information which is required to be included in our periodic reports filed with the SEC as of the filing of this Report.
  (b)           Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
  Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010.
  19
  However, a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the benefits of controls relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. Because of the inherent limitations in a control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.
  This Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. We were not required to have, nor have we engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to perform, an audit on our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Report.
  Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
  There were no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
  ITEM 9B.
Other Information
  None.
  20
  PART III
  ITEM 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
  Directors and Executive Officers
  Set forth below are our directors and executive officers, their ages, their positions with the Company, their business experience during the past five years or more, and additional biographical data.
 Name

Age

Position

Director

Since


Serves UntilAlbert Hernandez

62

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


2008



2011AJ Hernandez

40

Chief Financial and Chief Operating Officer


2008



2011E. Harold “Hal” Gassenheimer

72

Director


2010



2013John Nolan

62

Director


2010



2013Michael Margolies

51

Director


2010



2012Menachem Kranz

35

Director


2010



2012
 
 Albert P. Hernandezhas served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company since its inception. Prior to that time, from 2002 to March 2008, he served as the Chief Executive Officer of SkyPostal, Inc. From 1972 to 2002 he served in various executive positions with companies in the logistics business, including SkyCourier Network which was sold to Airborne Express in 1988 and SkyNet Worldwide Express which was sold to a division of Lan Chile Airlines in 2001. Mr. Hernandez has BBA in Accounting and MBA in finance from Iona College, New Rochelle, NY
 
 A.J. Hernandez has served as the Chief Operating Officer of the Company since its inception and as the Chief Financial Officer since December 2008. From 2001 until March 2008 he served as the Chief Operating Officer of SkyPostal, Inc. From 1993 to 2001 he served in executive positions with SkyBox Services, Inc., a company providing a U.S. address facility to enable upscale Latin American residents to receive mail, catalogues and Internet purchases via a mail warehouse facility in Miami, Florida. AJ Hernandez is the son of Albert Hernandez. Mr. Hernandez has an MBA in International Business from Florida International University, Miami,Fl.
 
 Mr. E. Harold “Hal” Gassenheimer was appointed Director of SkyPostal Network, Inc.’s Board of Directors effective May 5, 2010.  Mr. Gassenheimer brings over 30 years of financial and general management experience to the Company’s Board of Directors.  Mr. Gassenheimer obtained his MBA from the Harvard School of Business and began his career at ExxonMobil where he served 23 years in various executive positions developing expertise in international tax, legal and accounting matters.  Since ExxonMobil, Mr. Gassenheimer has participated as a partner with responsibility for finance in several large real estate development projects where he arranged debt financing and handled reporting requirements with banks.   He was the Treasurer of Cunard Line Limited and Seabourn Cruise Line, a division of Carnival Corporation for three years where he rebuilt the controls, systems and procedures for cash management.  Following that, Mr. Gassenheimer served as CFO for Avalon Research Group until its successful sale in 2005. Since then he has served as CFO of Reefbreak Management, a hedge fund, and COO of MAMC, Inc., a mortgage servicer.  Hal is currently the CFO of Littlebanc, an investment firm.
 
 John Nolan,Former Deputy Postmaster General, has significant executive experience in both the government and private sectors.  He is currently a board member for Streamlite, a business to consumer lightweight package delivery service in the U.S..  He serves as senior advisor to All Vision and Western Union. John served as Deputy Postmaster General for just over five years ending in mid 2005, one of the most challenging yet successful periods for the U.S.P.S.  He began his postal career as a management intern and quickly rose through the ranks to become Regional General Manager for Delivery, Regional Director for Customer Services, and Postmaster/General Manager of the world’s largest post office, New York City.  From 1989 to 2000 he was recruited to run the operations of Tritech, a print/fulfillment/lettershop/proxy services company within Merrill Lynch.  In addition to his corporate work, John serves on the board of several nonprofit organizations including the Smithsonian National Postal Museum, the Envelope Manufacturers Foundation, Washington & Lee University’s Shepherd Poverty Program and St. Columba Episcopal Church.  He also offers pro bono consulting services to nonprofits in the Washington DC area for board improvement.  John’s undergraduate degree is from Washington & Lee University and he also attended Harvard Business School’s Program for Management Development.
 
 Michael Margolies has over 25 years of investment banking experience. Mr. Margolies was a Managing Director of Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc. where he led the firm’s PIPE practice. Mr. Margolies founded and served as CEO of independent research provider, Avalon Research Group Inc., from 1995 through its sale in 2004. With over 100 hedge fund and mutual fund clients, Avalon was a top rated independent research firm and founding member of Investorside Research Association, a non-profit trade association of investment research providers not engaging in investment banking. Prior to founding Avalon, Mr. Margolies managed long/short discretionary accounts for M.A. Berman & Co., a boutique money management and brokerage firm with more than $500 million under management. In the eighties to early nineties, Mr. Margolies managed discretionary accounts as a Senior V.P. and Limited Partner at Oppenheimer and Company in New York. Mr. Margolies is currently Chief Executive Officer at Littlebanc, a boutique investment banking firm.
  21
 
 Menachem Kranz has worked for over a decade in the securities and finance industry, most recently as Vice President in the PIPEs practice at Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Prior to joining Ladenburg, Mr. Kranz leveraged his extensive contacts and relationships within the hedge and mutual fund communities in a variety of contexts, including as a hybrid trader with RBC Capital Markets and a Senior Vice President of institutional research sales at Avalon Research Group Inc. where he was instrumental in the rapid growth and development of the firm. Mr. Kranz’s educational background, Rabbinical College of America, laid the foundation for sound analytical minded process and affability.
  Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
  Based solely on a review of copies of reports filed with the SEC, the Company believes that during fiscal 2010, and through the date of this report, certain of its directors did not timely file all of the reports required to be filed by them under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  Code of Ethics
  Effective June 9, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. The code consists of basic standards of business practice as well as professional and personal conduct. The code provides guidance in how to uphold these standards. The code is filed as Exhibit 12.1 to our 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2010.
  Committees of the Board of Directors
  The Board of Directors has established several committees to assist it in fulfilling its responsibilities:
  ● The Audit Committee (comprised of Messrs. Gassenheimer (Chairman), Margolies and Kranz);
 ● The Compensation Committee (comprised of Messrs. Margolies (Chairman), Nolan and Gassenheimer);
 ● The Governance and Nominating Committee (comprised of Messrs. Kranz (Chairman), Gassenheimer, Nolan and Albert P. Hernandez)
  All of the members of the committees are nominated by the Governance and Nominating Committee and appointed by the Board of Directors. Members of these committees are elected annually at the Board of Directors’ meeting following the annual meeting of stockholders. All compensation paid or accrued for the members of the Company’s Board of Directors are reported under Item 11. Executive Compensation subsection Director Compensation.
  ITEM 11.
Executive Compensation
  Compensation of Executive Officers
  The following summary compensation table sets forth information concerning the total cash and non-cash compensation paid to or accrued for the three named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
 Name and Principal Position

Paid and

Accrued

Salary


Bonus


Stock Awards


Option

Awards


All Other

Compensation


TotalAlbert P. HernandezChief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board

$
153,899


$
—


$
—


$
—


$
26,925


$
180,824A.J. HernandezChief Operating andFinancial Officer


144,745



—



—



—



20,959



165,704Chris WeberDirector of European OperationsDirector on the Board of Directors

$
87,000


$
—


$
—


$
—


$
1,515


$
88,515
  The following summary compensation table sets forth information concerning the total cash and non-cash compensation paid to or accrued for the three named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
  Name and Principal Position

Paid and

Accrued

Salary


Bonus


Stock Awards


Option

Awards


All Other

Compensation


TotalAlbert P. HernandezChief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board

$
206,730


$
—


$
—


$
—


$
30,636


$
237,366A.J. HernandezChief Operating andFinancial Officer


185,616



—



—



—



17,178



202,794Chris WeberDirector of European OperationsDirector on the Board of Directors

$
102,000


$
—


$
—


$
—


$
3,935


$
105,935
  22
 
 Employment Agreements
  Albert P. Hernandez
  On May 17, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Albert Hernandez, the Chief Executive Officer. His employment agreement has an initial term of three years from the effective date. Mr. Hernandez currently receives a base salary of $130,000, subject to annual increases at the discretion of the Board of Directors. During the period of employment, Mr. Hernandez will also be entitled to additional benefits, including reimbursement of business expenses, paid vacation, an automobile allowance, a telephone allowance, life insurance and participation in other company benefit plans or programs that may be available to other executives or employees of our company.
  A.J. Hernandez
  On May 17, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. A.J. Hernandez, the Chief Financial and Chief Operating Officer. His employment agreement has an initial term of three years from the effective date. Mr. Hernandez currently receives a base salary of $130,000, subject to annual increases at the discretion of the Board of Directors, During the period of employment, Mr. Hernandez will also be entitled to additional benefits, including reimbursement of business expenses, paid vacation, an automobile allowance, a telephone allowance and participation in other company benefit plans or programs that may be available to other executives or employees of our company.
  Director Compensation
  The Director compensation for 2010 is shown below.
 Director

Fees

earned or

paid in

cash


Stock

awards


Option

awards


Non-equity

incentive plan

compensation


Change in

pension value

and

nonqualified

deferred

compensation

earnings


All other

compensation


TotalAlbert P. Hernandez (1)

$
—


$
—


$
—


$
—


$
—


$
—


$
—A.J. Hernandez (1)


—



—



—



—



—



—



—E. Harold “Hal” Gassenheimer


20,000
(2)


39,000



—



—



—



—



59,000John Nolan


(23,000
)


39,000



—



—



—



—



42,000Michael Margolies


—



39,000



—



—



—



—



39,000Menachem Kranz


—



39,000



—



—



—



—



39,000Christian J. Weber (1)


—



—



—



—



—



—



—Mathijs van Houweninge


—



—



—



—



—



—



—S. David Fineman


—



—



—



—



—



—



—Florian M. Schuhbauer


—



—



—



—



—



—



—Jose Misrahi


30,000



—



—



—



—



—



30,000
  (1)
Compensation for these individuals are included in the executive compensation table above.
  (2)
These payments are pursuant to consulting agreements signed by each of Mr. Gassenheimer and Mr. Nolan for services that are outside of the scope of the responsibilities of these individuals as members of the Company’s board of directors.  See discussion in Item 13 below.
  The Director compensation for 2009 is shown below.
 Director

Fees

earned or

paid in

cash


Stock

awards


Option

awards


Non-equity

incentive plan

compensation


Change in

pension value

and

nonqualified

deferred

compensation

earnings


All other

compensation


TotalAlbert P. Hernandez

$
—


$
—


$
—


$
—


$
—


$
—


$
—A.J. Hernandez


—



—



—



—



—



—



—Christian J. Weber


—



—



—



—



—



—



—Mathijs van Houweninge


—



—



—



—



—



45,192



45,192S. David Fineman


17,000



—



—



—



—



—



17,000Florian M. Schuhbauer


—



—



—



—



—



—



—Jose Misrahi

$
22,500


$
—


$
—


$
—


$
—


$
—


$
22,500
  23
  ITEM 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
  Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners
  The following table sets forth as of February 28, 2011, certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our outstanding common stock by (i) each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each Named Executive Officer, (iii) each of our Directors and (iv) all of such Directors and officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of the common shares owned by them.
 
 Beneficial OwnershipName and Address (1)

Shares

%Directors and Named Executive OfficersAlbert P. Hernandez


4,585,821

3.89
%A.J. Hernandez


4,611,658

3.91
%E. Harold “Hal” Gassenheimer (2)


300,000

0.25
%John Nolan (2)


300,000

0.25
%Michael Margolies (2)


300,000

0.25
%Menachem Kranz (2)


300,000

0.25
%All current executive officers and directors as a group (6 persons)


10,397,479

8.82
%Beneficial Owners of More than 5%Cede & Co


15,342,766

12.77
%Holston Investments, BVI


7,626,780

6.61
%
 
 
  (1)
The address of all Directors is care of the Company at the address shown on the cover of this filing.
  (2)
These shares have been issued subject to vesting of 100,000 shares on each of August16, 2011, 2012, and 2013.
  ITEM 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
 
 Agreement with Hal Gassenheimer
 
 In July 2010, the Company entered into agreement with Mr. Gassenheimer for international management and financial services.  The agreement provides for a monthly retainer of $4,000 to be paid to Mr. Gassenheimer and may be terminated by either party at any time.
 
 Investment Banking Agreement
 An entity affiliated with Messrs.. Margolies, Gassenheimer and Kranz provided investment banking services to the Company related to the May 2010 issuance of convertible debt and warrants, and has a consulting relationship with the Company.  The affiliated entity received a convertible note in the amount of $316,400 and warrants to purchase 1,265,600 shares of common stock at $0.15 per share.
 
 Director Independence
  As of the date of this Report, the Company’s common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board and does not have securities listed on a larger national securities exchange or in an inter-dealer quotation system. As such, there is no requirement that a majority of the members of our Board of Directors be independent. Under these standards, a director is not “independent” if he has financial transactions with the Company or any other relationships that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with his exercise of independent judgment as a Director. Albert and A.J. Hernandez are employed by the Company and are not independent.  Messrs. Margolies, Gassenheimer and Kranz may not be independent because of the relationship described in the preceding paragraph, although the board has not made any determination concerning whether they are independent.
  ITEM 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
  The firm of Morrison, Brown, Argiz and Farra, LLC (“MBAF”), an independent registered public accounting firm, has served as our auditors for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2010 and 2009.
  24
  Audit and Non-Audit Fees
  The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by MBAF for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and fees billed for other services for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
 Services

2010


2009Fees for annual audit and quarterly reviews

$
85,000


$
110,000Review of SEC filings


-



10,000Tax and other matters


-



9,200Total

$
85,000


$
129,200
  Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
  Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility for appointing, setting auditor compensation and overseeing the work of the independent auditor. In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee established a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditor.
  PART IV
  ITEM 15.
Exhibits, Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
 31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
 31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 32.1
Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  25
 
 SIGNATURES
  In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 SkyShop Logistics, Inc.Date: March 17, 2011
/s/ Albert P. HernandezAlbert P. HernandezChief Executive Officer and PresidentDate: March 17, 2011
/s/ A.J. HernandezA.J. HernandezChief Financial Officer  Date: March 17, 2011
/s/ Hal GassenheimerDirector/s/ Michael MargoliesDirector
 
 26
 
 INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009

F-3Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

F-4Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

F-5Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

F-9Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-10
  F - 1
  REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 To the Board of Directors and
 Stockholders of SkyShop Logistics, Inc.
 
 We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of SkyShop Logistics, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
 
 We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of SkyShop Logistics, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its consolidated operations and its cash flows for the year ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
 The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a deficiency in working capital and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
   
 March 16, 2011
 Miami, Florida
 
 
 MIAMI1001 Brickell Bay Drive, 9th Floor, Miami FL 33131 |T305 373 5500F305 373 0056 | www.mbafcpa.com
  
 F - 2
 
 SKYSHOP LOGISTICS, INC.
 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
 SHEETS
 December 31, 2010


December 31, 2009ASSETSCURRENT ASSETS:Cash

$
917,570


$
36,513Accounts receivable, net


826,670



1,140,021Prepaid expenses and other


144,208



61,135TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS


1,888,448



1,237,669DUE FROM STOCKHOLDER


2,708



1,974PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net


119,697



97,770INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net


489,392



776,253OTHER ASSETS, net


290,492



79,269TOTAL ASSETS

$
2,790,737


$
2,192,935LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICITLIABILITIESCURRENT LIABILITIES:Accounts payable

$
1,139,523


$
1,648,305Accrued liabilities


735,558



772,217Current portion of amount due on non-compete agreements


370,740



333,137Customer deposits


1,469



1,603Current portion of put option payable


278,400



1,296,000TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES


2,525,690



4,051,262CONVERTIBLE DEBT, NET


532,915



-NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS, less current portion


52,500



173,500EXCESS OF VALUE OF PUT OPTIONS OVER THE ESTIMATEDFAIR VALUE OF SHARES, less current portion


22,400



1,296,000TOTAL LIABILITIES


3,133,505



5,520,762COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESSTOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICITConvertible preferred stock, $.001 par value, 50,000,000 authorized, 1,360,000 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and none issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009


1,360



-Common stock, $.001 par value, 350,000,000 authorized, 95,083,179 and 69,443,292 shares issued and 94,763,179 and 69,123,292 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively


95,084



69,444Subscribed stock


791,586



-Subscriptions receivable


(85,000
)


-Additional paid-in capital


27,503,528



21,308,161Accumulated deficit


(28,355,320
)


(24,299,296
)Treasury stock, at cost (320,000 shares at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009)


(320,000
)


(320,000
)Accumulated comprehensive income (loss)


14,001



(4,644
)Non-controlling interest


11,993



(81,492
)TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT


(342,768
)


(3,327,827
)TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

$
2,790,737


$
2,192,935
   F - 3
 
 SKYSHOP LOGISTICS, INC.
 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
 Year Ended December 31,2010


2009NET REVENUES

$
7,624,092


$
8,285,737OPERATING EXPENSES:Cost of delivery


6,167,940



7,038,584General and administrative


3,936,125



4,196,529Stock based compensation


247,998



258,865TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES


10,352,063



11,493,978OPERATING LOSS


(2,727,971
)


(3,208,241
)OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME):Interest


53,038



-Amortization of discounts


814,580



-Changes in excess value of put optionover the estimated fair value of shares


64,000



374,400Provision for escrow deposit


-



149,975Impairment losses


139,041



307,455Other


184,108



299,087TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)


1,254,767



1,130,917NET LOSS


(3,982,738
)


(4,339,158
)Net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest


(100,567
)


(75,362
)Loss attributable to the controlling interest


(3,882,171
)


(4,263,796
)Deemed dividend on convertible preferred stock


(798,333
)


-Net loss attributable to common shareholders

$
(4,680,504
)

$
(4,263,796
)WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:Basic


81,748,353



65,356,429Effect of dilutive shares


-



-Diluted


81,748,353



65,356,429NET LOSS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TOCOMMON STOCKHOLDERSBasic and Diluted

$
(0.06
)

$
(0.07
)
  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
  F - 4
  SKYSHOP LOGISTICS, INC.
 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
 FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009
 
 AdditionalPreferred Stock


Common Stock


Paid-In


Subscribed


SubscriptionsShares


Amount


Shares


Amount


Capital


Stock


ReceivableBALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2008


-


$
-



56,494,664


$
56,815


$
19,031,338


$
-


$
-Components of comprehensiveloss:Net loss


-



-



-



-



-



-



-Foreign currency translation adjustment


-



-



-



-



-



-



-Total comprehensive loss


-



-



-



-



-



-



-Sale of common stock through private placement
-


-



9,630,000



9,630



953,370



-



-Private placement transactioncosts


-



-



1,063,000



1,063



(127,620
)


-



-Warrants converted for commonstock


-



-



100,000



100



14,900



-



-Stock compensation(nonvested shares)


-



-



-



-



258,865



-



-Recognition of employee and directorstock grants vested


-



-



1,076,091



1,076



(1,076
)


-



-Common stock issued for LELacquisition


-



-



400,000



400



99,600



-



-Common stock issued for tradepayable


-



-



39,537



40



23,682



-



-Common stock issued forconsulting fees payable


-



-



320,000



320



31,680



-



-Sale of subsidiary preferred stockthrough private placement


-



-



-



-



915,600



-



-Subsidiary private placementtransaction costs


-



-



-



-



(123,979
)


-



-Warrants issued with sale ofsubsidiary preferred stock


-



-



-



-



174,400



-



-Subsidiary preferred stock issuedfor director fees payable


-



-



-



-



-



-



-Noncontrolling interest in LEL


-



-



-



-



-



-



-Noncontrolling interest in PuntoMio


-



-



-



-



57,401



-



-BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2009


-



-



69,123,292


$
69,444


$
21,308,161


$
-


$
-
 (Continued on next page)
  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
  F - 5
  SKYSHOP LOGISTICS, INC.
 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
 FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009 (Continued)
  Non-


Accumulated


TotalAccumulated


Treasury


Controlling

Comprehensive


Stockholders’Deficit


Stock



Interest


Income


DeficitBALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2008

$
(20,035,500
)

$
(320,000
)

$
-


$
-


$
(1,267,347
)Components of comprehensive loss:Net loss


(4,263,796
)


-



(75,362
)


-



(4,339,158
)Foreign currency translation adjustment


-



-



(1,990
)


(4,644
)


(6,634
)Total comprehensive loss


-



-



-



-



(4,345,792
)Sale of common stock through private placement


-



-



-



-



963,000Private placement transaction costs


-



-



-



-



(126,557
)Warrants converted for common stock


-



-



-



-



15,000Stock compensation


-



-



-



-



258,865(nonvested shares)Recognition of employee and director stock grants vested


















-Common stock issued for LEL acquisition


-



-



-



-



100,000Common stock issued for trade payable


-



-



-



-



23,722Common stock issued for consulting fees payable


-



-



-



-



32,000Sale of subsidiary preferred stock through private placement


-



-



-



-



915,600Subsidiary private placement transaction costs


-



-



-



-



(123,979
)Warrants issued with sale of subsidiary preferred stock


-



-



-



-



174,400Subsidiary preferred stock issued for director fees payable


-



-



45,192



-



45,192Noncontrolling interest in LEL


-



-



8,069



-



8,069Noncontrolling interest in PuntoMio


-



-



(57,401
)


-



-BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2009

$
(24,299,296
)

$
(320,000
)

$
(81,492
)

$
(4,644
)

$
(3,327,827
)
  (Continued on next page)
  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
  F - 6
  SKYSHOP LOGISTICS, INC.
 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
 FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009 (Continued)
 AdditionalPreferred Stock


Common Stock


Paid-In


Subscribed


SubscriptionsShares


Amount


Shares


Amount


Capital


Stock


ReceivableBALANCES AT DECEMBER31, 2009


-


$
-



69,123,292


$
69,444


$
21,308,161


$
-


$
-Components of comprehensive loss:Net loss


-



-



-



-



-



-



-Foreign currency translationadjustment


-



-



-



-



-



-



-Total comprehensive loss


-



-



-



-



-



-



-Subscriptions received


-



-



-



-



329,414



706,586



-Subscriptions receivable


-



-



-



-



-



85,000



(85,000
)Offering costs relataed tosubscriptions received


-



-



-



-



(95,100
)


-



-Stock compensation - employeesand director shares


-



-



3,050,900



3,051



244,947



-



-Common stock issued foraccrued payroll


-



-



856,300



856



84,774



-



-Common stock issued fortrade payable


-



-



1,000,000



1,000



99,000



-



-PuntoMio Exchange


11,425,160



11,425



-



-



786,908



-



-Disposition of non-controllinginterest in PuntoMio


-



-



-



-



(12,209
)


-



-Deemed dividend fromPuntoMio Exchange


-



-



-



-



(798,333
)


-



-Redemption of warrants included inPuntoMio preferred stock exchange


-



-



-



-



(109,000
)


-



-Conversion of preferred stock


(10,065,160
)


(10,065
)


10,065,160



10,065



-



-



-Effect of adjustment of put optionpayable


-



-



-



-



2,355,200



-



-Broker fee for 3% $2.26mConvertible Note


-



-



-



-



(52,522
)


-



-Warrants issued with 3% $2.26mConvertible Note


-



-



-



-



375,268



-



-Beneficial conversion feature attributedto 3% $2.26m Convertible Note


-



-



-



-



1,884,732



-



-Warrants issued with 3% $316kConvertible Note


-



-



-



-



52,538



-



-Beneficial conversion feature attributedto 3% $316k Convertible Note


-



-



-



-



263,862



-



-Conversion of 2% $402k & $95kConvertible Notes into common stock


-



-



9,969,651



9,970



488,513



-



-Beneficial conversion feature attributedto 3% $25k Convertible Note


-



-



-



-



20,896



-



-Warrants issued with Convertible Notes


















4,104Private placement equity fee for conversionof 2% $402k & $95k convertible notes


-



-



697,876



698



(698
)


-



-Private placement fees for 2% $402kConvertible Notes


-



-



-



-



(5,592
)


-



-Warrants issued with Convertible Notes


-



-



-



-



79,865



-



-Beneficial conversion features attributedto Convertible Notes


-



-



-



-



198,800



-



-BALANCES ATDECEMBER 31, 2010


1,360,000


$
1,360



94,763,179


$
95,084


$
27,503,528


$
791,586


$
(85,000
)
 
 (Continued on next page)
  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
  F - 7
  SKYSHOP LOGISTICS, INC.
 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
 FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009 (Continued)
 Non-


Accumulated


TotalAccumulated


Treasury


Controlling


Comprehensive


Stockholders’Deficit


Stock


Interest


Income


DeficitBALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2009

$
(24,299,296
)

$
(320,000
)

$
(81,492
)

$
(4,644
)

$
(3,327,827
)Components of comprehensive loss:Net loss


(3,882,171
)


-



(100,567
)


-



(3,982,738
)Foreign currency translation adjustment


-



-



7,990



18,645



26,635Total comprehensive loss


-



-



-



-



(3,956,103
)Subscriptions received


-



-



-



-



1,036,000Subscriptions receivable


-



-



-



-



-Offering costs relataed to subscriptions received
-


-



-



-



(95,100
)Stock compensation - employees and director shares


-



-



-



-



247,998Common stock issued for accrued payroll


-



-



-



-



85,630Common stock issued for trade payable


-



-



-



-



100,000PuntoMio Exchange


-



-



-



-



798,333Disposition of non-controlling interest in PuntoMio


(173,853
)


-



186,062



-



-Deemed dividend from PuntoMio Exchange


-



-



-



-



(798,333
)Redemption of warrants included in PuntoMio preferred stock exchange


-



-



-



-



(109,000
)Conversion of preferred stock


-



-



-



-



-Effect of adjustment of put option payable


-



-



-



-



2,355,200Broker fee for 3% $2.26m Convertible Note


-



-



-



-



(52,522
)Warrants issued with 3% $2.26m Convertible Note


-



-



-



-



375,268Beneficial conversion feature attributed to 3% $2.26m Convertible Note


-



-



-



-



1,884,732Warrants issued with 3% $316k Convertible Note


-



-



-



-



52,538Beneficial conversion feature attributed to 3% $316k Convertible Note


-



-



-



-



263,862Conversion of 2% $402k & $95k Convertible Notes into common stock


-



-



-



-



498,483Beneficial conversion feature attributed to 3% $25k Convertible Note


-



-



-



-



20,896Warrants issued with Convertible Notes


















4,104Private placement equity fee for conversion of 2% $402k & $95k convertible notes


-



-



-



-



-Private placement fees for 2% $402k Convertible Notes


-



-



-



-



(5,592
)Warrants issued with Convertible Notes


-



-



-



-



79,865Beneficial conversion features attributed to Convertible Notes


-



-



-



-



198,800BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2010

$
(28,355,320
)

$
(320,000
)

$
11,993


$
14,001


$
(342,768
)
  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
  F - 8
  SKYSHOP LOGISTICS, INC.
 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
  2010


2009CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:Net loss

$
(3,982,738
)

$
(4,339,158
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss including noncontrolling interestto net cash used in operating activities:Amortization of debt discounts


814,580



-Amortization of financing fees


83,658



-Depreciation and amortization


193,472



212,305Bad debt expense


34,884



38,234Provision for escrow deposit


-



149,975Impairment losses


139,041



307,455Stock compensation expense


247,998



258,865Conversion of interest on convertible debt


1,483



-Revaluation of put option liability


64,000



374,400Changes in assets and liabilitiesDecrease in accounts receivable


278,466



433,195(Increase) decrease in prepaid expense and other assets


(84,877
)


116,833Decrease in intangible assets


-



216,020(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities


(359,812
)


121,512(Decrease) increase in customer deposits


(134
)


1,603Net cash used in operating activities


(2,569,979
)


(2,108,761
)CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:(Advances to) repayments from stockholders


(734
)


60,395Cash acquired in acquisition of LEL


-



11,753Payment of trademark costs


(17,528
)


(9,996
)Capital expenditures


(50,051
)


(9,166
)Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities


(68,313
)


52,986CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Issuance of capital stock, net of offering costs


-



836,443Proceeds from subscriptions received not issued


1,036,000



-Payment of offering costs related to subscriptions received not issued


(95,100
)


-Issuance of warrants in connection with sale of subsidiary preferred stock, net


-



174,400Issuance of subsidiary preferred stock


-



791,621Warrants (redeemed) exercised


(109,000
)


15,000Payments of amounts due for non-compete agreements


(83,397
)


(27,996
)Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable, net of offering costs


2,994,211



-Payment of principal on convertible notes payable


(250,000
)


-Net cash provided by financing activities


3,492,714



1,789,468Effect of exchange rate changes


26,635



(6,635
)Net increase (decrease) in cash


881,057



(272,942
)Cash, beginning of period


36,513



309,455Cash, end of period

$
917,570


$
36,513Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:Cash paid during the period for:Interest

$
3,592


$
-Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:Non-compete agreement-LEL acquisition

$
-


$
100,000Reduction of noncompete payable in exchange for payment of administrative costs

$
-


$
163,867Common stock issued for trade payable

$
100,000


$
55,722Subsidiary stock issued for director fee payable

$
-


$
45,192Issuance of convertible note in settlement of financing fee on $2.26 million convertible debt

$
316,400


$
-Issuance of warrants in settlement of financing fee on $2.26 million convertible debt

$
52,522


$
-Debt issuance costs capitalized in other assets related to the issuance of $2.26 million convertible debt

$
263,878


$
-Beneficial conversion features and warrants on convertible debt

$
2,880,065


$
-Conversion of $497,000 note payble and $1,483 of accrued interest into common stock

$
498,483


$
-Adjustment to put option liability

$
2,355,200


$
-Issuance of common stock for accrued payroll

$
85,630


$
-
  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
  F - 9
  Note 1. Organization
  On April 15, 2008, Omega United, Inc. (“Omega”) entered into and closed an agreement concerning the exchange of securities between Omega and SkyPostal, Inc. and its security holders of (the “Securities Exchange”). Pursuant to the Securities Exchange, Omega issued 29,000,000 shares of common stock for all of the issued and outstanding common stock of SkyPostal, Inc. On July 25, 2008, Omega changed its name to SkyPostal Networks, Inc. (the “Company”).
  In June 2008, the Company activated a subsidiary, SkyShop Logistics, Inc. doing business as “PuntoMio”, to offer a new service. PuntoMio co-markets with banks and others to facilitate cross border online shopping, customs clearance and delivery. The new service enables non-U.S. resident internet shoppers to know the ‘landed cost’ upfront and use PuntoMio as their mailing address for merchandise bought on U.S. e-commerce websites. The landed cost is the customs, duties, clearance and delivery cost to the non-U.S. resident customer. In October 2008, the PuntoMio.com website was successfully launched.
  On February 27, 2009, the Company acquired seventy percent of the common stock of Logistics Enterprises, Ltda (“LEL”), a Colombian company also engaged in wholesale mail distribution and related activities, as more fully described in Note 5 Business Combinations. The acquisition provided the Company with a hub in the customs Free Zone in Bogota, Colombia, which allows the Company to consolidate greater tonnage at better line haul rates. The hub also allows the Company to provide shorter delivery times in Latin America and to reduce certain mail sorting expenses related to handling in Miami, FL. The acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method and the operating results of LEL are included in the consolidated financial statements beginning March 1, 2009.
  During third quarter 2009, the Company sold units comprised of one preferred share of PuntoMio, its subsidiary, plus one warrant to purchase one common share of the Company, at an exercise price of $.10 expiring July 1, 2012, for $1.00 per unit in a private placement. The Company sold 1,090,000 units of PuntoMio preferred stock and warrants for the Company’s common stock and received proceeds of $966,021 net of placement fees paid to Falcon. In addition to the cash fee paid to Falcon, the Company issued Falcon 284,345 shares of PuntoMio preferred stock for their efforts in connection with the private placement. Effective April 30, 2010, the Company entered into an equity exchange (“PuntoMio Exchange”) with the preferred interest holders of PuntoMio.  The Company exchanged eight preferred convertible shares of the Company for every one PuntoMio preferred share.  Simultaneous with the PuntoMio Exchange, the Company bought back or redeemed 1,090,000 warrants for $109,000.  As a result of the April 30, 2010 transaction, there is no longer a non-controlling interest in PuntoMio.At December 31, 2009, there existed a 24.1% non-controlling interest in PuntoMio, more fully described in Note 14-Common and Preferred Stock and Note15 -Warrants.
  On July 16, 2010, SkyPostal Networks, Inc., a Nevada corporation, changed its name to SkyShop Logistics, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “the Company”)  to better describe the repositioning of its primary operations to that of an international e-commerce service company.  Through its trademarked name “PuntoMio”, the Company is engaged in cross border shopping facilitation by providing services to non-U.S. based shoppers accessing U.S. online merchant sites.  The service provides a U.S. address and calculates the “landed cost” including the cost of shipping, customs and delivery for the buyer prior to the purchase.  Online merchants wishing to sell to international buyers can eliminate the risks associated with foreign sales by utilizing the Company’s Global e-Cart solutions and delivering the purchase to a U.S. address. The Company’s subsidiary, SkyPostal, Inc., provides international, bar-coded, low cost distribution of catalogs, books and publications below United States Postal Service (“USPS”) costs with track and trace visibility.  The Company relies on its own proprietary integrated delivery network consisting of commercial and cargo airlines, customs brokers, local private postal services and delivery companies linked by its PosTrac mail and parcel tracking system.
  On July 16, 2010, a majority of the voting shareholders approved the Company name change to SkyShop Logistics, Inc. and an increase in the authorized shares of common stock available for issuance at $0.001 par value, from 150,000,000 to 350,000,000 shares.
  Note 2. Liquidity and Management Plans
  Liquidity
  As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses from operations and as of December 31, 2010 had an accumulated deficit of $28,355,320.  As of December 31, 2010, the Company’s current liabilities exceeded its current assets by approximately $637,242. Cash flow from operations has been negative for each quarter of 2009 and 2010. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
  As of December 31, 2010, the Company had convertible debt outstanding with an aggregate principal balance of $2,601,400, amounts due related to noncompete agreements of $423,240 and a potential put liability of $300,800.  The convertible notes are more fully described in Note 11 - Convertible Debt.  The non-compete and put option agreement is described more fully in Note 10- Non-Compete Agreements. The Company believes that because the shareholders have a financial ownership interest in the Company and because the Company has an economically important arms length working relationship, the shareholder would not enforce his right under the contract to request collection of monies due to him nor pursue litigation under the non-compete agreement and put option agreement at this time because his interests are aligned with the success of the Company.
  F - 10
  In November and December of 2010, the Company obtained subscriptions for the sale of 22,420,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 4,484,000 shares of common stock for net proceeds of $1,008,900, net of offering costs of $95,100 paid in 2010 and $17,000 paid in 2011.  $1,036,000 of the gross proceeds were received during 2010 and $85,000 was received in 2011.  Amounts received for which the common stock had yet to be issued as of December 31, 2010 are reflected as Subscribed stock on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  Amounts not received until 2011 are reflected as Subscriptions receivable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
  The Company is exploring other alternatives for financing and raising additional equity in the capital markets but there can be no assurances that these efforts will be successful.
  Management Plans
  Management is constantly seeking opportunities to lower operating and administrative costs, increase revenue, and achieve positive cash flows from operations and profitability, including the following initiatives achieved in the twelve months ended December 31, 2010:
  ●
Repositioning of the Company’s core focus from low margin mail distribution to the provision of higher margin shopping facilitation services to foreign consumers and U.S. merchants.
  ●
Increased investment in its PuntoMio’s e-commerce technology, foreign co-marketing banking relationships, internet marketing and international parcel service to foreign shoppers and U.S. online merchants.
  ●
Repositioning its sales strategy by focusing efforts on generating higher margin international retail sales from and to Latin American countries.
  Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
  Management Use of Estimates
  The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates and assumptions impact, among others, the following: the amount of uncollectible accounts receivable, the amount to be paid for the settlement of liabilities related to cost of sales, the estimated useful lives for property and equipment, the value assigned to the warrants granted in connection with the various financing arrangements and calculation for stock compensation expense. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
  Principles of Consolidation
  The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SkyShop Logistics, Inc. formerly SkyPostal Networks, Inc., as parent, and all entities in which the Company has a controlling voting interest. The Company has a controlling interest in SkyShop Logistics of Florida, Inc. doing business as “PuntoMio” and “Global E-Cart”, SkyPostal, Inc. and Logistics Enterprises “LEL”. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between have been eliminated in consolidation.
  Reclassification
  Certain prior period amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.
  Cash
  Cash primarily consists of demand deposits in interest and non-interest bearing accounts. The carrying amount of these deposits approximates their fair value. The Company’s balances maintained may at times, exceed available depository insurance limits. As of December 31, 2010 the Company had deposits of $507,634 in excess of depository insurance limits.
  Accounts Receivable
  Accounts receivable are uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms requiring payment within 30 days from the invoice date. Accounts receivable are recorded at the stated amount of the transactions with the Company’s customers. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on the customer’s creditworthiness, their payment history and the amount currently past due. All balances are reviewed individually for collectability. Accounts receivable are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted. Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoice amount net of allowance.
  F - 11
  Deferred Offering Costs
  Direct costs incurred in connection with the issuance of equity are capitalized and charged to additional paid in capital during the period when proceeds are received.
  Property and Equipment
  Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation of office and computer equipment, furniture and fixtures, computer software and warehouse equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset generally ranging from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the related lease term, commencing the month after the asset is placed in service. The costs of repair and maintenance are expensed when incurred, while expenditures for improvements that significantly add to the productive capacity or extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized.
  Capitalized Software Development Costs
  Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Software and PDA development costs incurred subsequent to establishing technological feasibility through the general release of the software products are capitalized, within property and equipment, in accordance withASC No. 350-40, Internal-Use Software. Technological feasibility is demonstrated by the completion of a working model. Capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over three years which is the estimated useful life of the software product. During 2009, based on management’s analysis, the PDA-GPS asset was determined to be fully impaired and an expense was recorded for $231,000.  As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 there were no unamortized software development costs.
  Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
  In accordance with ASC No. 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
  Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheets.
  During 2009, based on Management’s analysis, the License Agreement was determined to be fully impaired and an expense was recorded for the remaining net book value of $76,160.   During 2010, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $139,041 related to the write-down of a non-compete agreement.
  Contingencies
  The Company accrues for contingent obligations, including legal costs, when the obligation is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. As facts concerning contingencies become known, the Company reassesses its position and makes appropriate adjustments to the consolidated financial statements. Estimates that are particularly sensitive to future changes include those related to tax, legal, and other regulatory matters that are subject to change as events evolve and additional information becomes available.
  Fair Value Measurements
  The Company has determined the estimated fair value amounts presented in these consolidated financial statements using available market information and appropriate methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The estimates presented in the consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. See Note 13- Fair Value Measurements.
  Revenue Recognition and Cost of Delivery
  Revenue is recognized upon delivery of a letter or a package in accordance with ASC 605-20, Revenue and Expense Recognition for Freight Service in Process.This method generally results in recognition of revenues and purchased transportation costs earlier than methods that do not recognize revenues until a proof of delivery is received or that recognize revenues as progress on the transit is made. The company’s method of revenue and cost recognition does not result in a material difference from amounts that would be reported under such other methods.  Cost of Delivery is comprised of postage, export line haul costs, clearance costs, and hand delivery costs.
  Foreign Currency and Translation Policy
  F - 12
  The financial statements of our foreign operation, LEL, are stated in a foreign currency, referred to as the functional currency. Under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, functional currency assets and liabilities are translated into the reporting currency, U.S. Dollars, using period end rates of exchange while revenues and expenses are translated at average rates in effect during the period. Equity is translated at historical rates and the resulting cumulative translation adjustments are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.  The Company recognized a net foreign currency gain of $46,375 and net foreign currency loss of $14,518 during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  Such amounts are included in Other on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
  Stock Based Compensation Plan
  The Company accounts for stock based compensation according to ASC No. 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, and ASC No. 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. Stock-based compensation for awards granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of January 1, 2006 are recorded as if the fair value method required for pro forma disclosure under previous accounting standards were in effect for expense recognition purposes, adjusted for estimated forfeitures. For stock-based awards granted after January 1, 2006, we have recognized compensation expense based on the estimated grant date fair value method using the Lattice option pricing model prior to April 2008 and the Black-Scholes option pricing model thereafter. For these awards, we have recognized compensation expense using a straight-line amortization method (prorated). ASC No. 718 requires that stock-based compensation expense be based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest, after considering estimated forfeitures.
  Loss Per Share
  Basic loss per share is presented on the face of the consolidated statements of operations. Basic earnings or loss per share “EPS” is calculated as the loss attributable to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period. Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Due to the Company’s losses from continuing operations, dilutive potential common shares in the form of warrants and restricted common stock awards subject to vesting were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as inclusion would be anti-dilutive for the periods presented.
  Income Taxes
  Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
  When required, the Company records a liability for unrecognized tax positions, defined as the aggregate tax effect of differences between positions taken on tax returns and the benefits recognized in the financial statements. Tax positions are measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. No tax benefits are recognized for positions that do not meet this threshold. The Company has no uncertain tax positions that require the Company to record a liability. The Company’s tax years ended after December 31, 2006 remain subject to examination by Federal and state jurisdictions.
 The Company recognizes penalties and interest associated with tax matters as part of the income tax provision and includes accrued interest and penalties with the related tax liability in the balance sheet.
  Business Combinations and Non-controlling Interest
  Effective March 1, 2009, the Company acquired 70% of the outstanding common stock of LEL, a Colombian logistics company. The Company used the acquisition method of accounting to account and report the LEL acquisition.
  On September 30, 2009, the Company sold a 24.1% preferred equity interest in its wholly owned subsidiary PuntoMio and Company warrants for cash proceeds of $966,021 for cash.  Effective April 30, 2010, the Company entered into an equity exchange (“PuntoMio Exchange”) with the preferred interest holders of PuntoMio.  The Company exchanged eight preferred convertible shares of the Company for every one PuntoMio preferred share.  Simultaneous with the PuntoMio Exchange, the Company bought back or redeemed 1,090,000 warrants for $109,000.  There is no longer a non-controlling interest in PuntoMio as of June 30, 2010.  The ownership percentage of the non-controlling interest in LEL has not changed.
 
 F - 13
 
 The following table presents the (increase) decrease in the deficit attributable to the Company as of December 31, 2010 as a result of the Punto Mio Exchange.
  Net loss attributable to the Company

$
3,882,171Increase in the Company’s additional paid-in  capital from the Exchange


(798,333
)Change from net loss attributable to the Company and transfers from non-controlling interest

$
3,083,838
  New Accounting Pronouncements
  In August 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard update to guidance on fair value measurements and disclosure. The updated guidance clarifies that the fair value of a liability can be measured in relation to the quoted price of the liability when the liability trades as an asset in an active market, without adjusting the price for restrictions that prevent the transfer of the liability. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after August 31, 2009. The Company does not expect the update to have an effect on the valuation techniques used by the Company for measuring liabilities at fair value.
  In January 2010, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that clarifies that the decrease-in-ownership provisions of the consolidation guidance of the Codification apply to: (1) a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity, (2) a subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture, and (3) an exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for a noncontrolling interest in an entity (including an equity method investee or joint venture). The update also clarifies that the decrease in ownership guidance on accounting for decreases in ownership of a subsidiary does not apply if the transaction is a sale of in-substance real estate or conveyance of oil and properties. This update is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 with retrospective application required for the first period of adoption of the consolidation guidance in the Codification. The Company adopted the amendment upon issuance with no material impact to its financial position or results of operations.
  In January 2010, the FASB issued an accounting standard update on fair value measurements and disclosures. The update requires more robust disclosures about (1) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (4) the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. This update is not expected to have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
  Note 4. Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk
  In the normal course of business, the Company incurs credit risk from accounts receivable by extending credit on a non-collateralized basis primarily to U.S. and non-U.S. based customers. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition as part of its decision to provide credit terms. The Company maintains an allowance for potential credit losses based on historical experience and other information available to management.
  Accounts receivable, net, consisted of the following at December 31:
 2010


2009Accounts Receivable

$
876,355


$
1,183,573Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts


(49,685
)


(43,552
)Accounts Receivable, net

$
826,670


$
1,140,021
  During the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, approximately 39.8% and 28.5% of the Company’s revenues were generated from two customers, respectively. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 approximately 29.6% and 16.6%, respectively, of the Company’s cost of sales was purchased from two and one vendor, respectively.
  F - 14
  Note 5. Business Combinations
  On February 27, 2009, the Company acquired 70 percent of the outstanding common stock of LEL. The purchase consideration of $100,000 was comprised of 400,000 shares of common stock in the Company with a fair value of $100,000 ($.25 per share). The Company stock has certain restrictions on its sale, including a lockup period where the seller cannot sell the common stock for 18 months. The purchase price was allocated to the tangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values and any excess was allocated to the fair values of identifiable intangible assets, identified as LEL’s customer list. For accounting purposes, the effective date of the acquisition was determined to be March 1, 2009. The allocation of the purchase price as of March 1, 2009 is shown below:
 Cash

$
11,753Accounts receivable


112,455Other assets


13,791Customer List-LEL


81,020Accounts payable


(31,994
)Other liabilities


(78,956
)Non-controlling equity interest


(8,069
)Net assets acquired

$
100,000
  The fair value determination of non-controlling interest is shown below:
 LEL net asset value


26,897Non-controlling percentage


30
%Non-controlling interest

$
8,069
  Coincident with the acquisition, the Company entered into an employment agreement with the seller of LEL to continue serving as the General Manager of Colombian operations for three years. In addition, as compensation to not compete with the Company for one year after any separation, the Company agreed to make 25 monthly payments of $4,000 commencing one month after closing. The Company also has the right to acquire the remaining thirty percent shareholding in LEL at any time after March 1, 2011, based on a formula determined in part by LEL’s pre-tax earnings for the preceding twelve months.
  Note 6. Property and Equipment, net
  Property and equipment, net, consisted of the following at December 31,
 2010


2009Office and computer equipment

$
171,805


$
167,698Computer software


246,361



204,153Furniture and fixtures


47,598



45,595Warehouse equipment


73,378



71,645Leasehold improvements


1,755



1,755540,897



490,846Less: Accumulated Depreciation


(421,200
)


(393,076
)Property and equipment, net

$
119,697


$
97,770
  Depreciation expense for the twelve months ending December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $28,124 and $33,669, respectively.
  Note 7. Intangible Assets, net
  Intangible assets as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are shown below:
 2010


2009

Life (yrs)Trademarks

$
106,772


$
89,244

IndefiniteCustomer List-LEL


81,020



81,020

ThreeNon-Compete-LEL


100,000



100,000

ThreeNon-Compete-Shareholder


595,959



735,000

SevenGPS PDA Investment


-



-

ThreeLicense Agreement


-



-

FiveSubtotal


883,751



1,005,264Less: Accumulated Amortization


(394,359
)


(229,011
)Intangible Assets, net

$
489,392


$
776,253
  Amortization expense was $165,348 and $178,636 for years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
  The company has various registered trademarks in North America, Europe, Middle East and Latin America that are very valuable under which the company trades depending on the market and co-marketing partner. The carrying value of the trademarks represents legal and other costs related to development and registration of the Company’s trademarks. Additional expenditures of $17,528 and $9,996, related to trademarks, were incurred and capitalized during the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Trademarks are considered to have an indefinite life and as such are not amortized.
  F - 15




On February 27, 2009, the Company acquired 70 percent of the outstanding common stock of LEL. The purchase price was allocated to the tangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values and any excess was allocated to the fair value of identifiable intangible assets, identified as LEL’s customer list, amounting to $81,020. The Company also entered into a non-compete agreement, with a shareholder of LEL, which includes payments totaling $100,000, comprised of 25 payments of $4,000 payable on a monthly basis. The non-compete agreement was recorded as an intangible asset and will be amortized on a straight line basis over three years. At December 31, 2010, the Customer List-LEL, net and the Non-Compete-LEL, net amounted to $33,749, and $41,662, respectively.
  During 2008 and 2009, the Company attempted to develop proprietary software which would be used by the Company to enhance the delivery of mail to its customers. The Company capitalizes the costs until the point at which the software project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, that is, after all substantial testing is completed. During the last two quarters of 2009, Management attempted to identify a partner with whom to complete testing and put the asset into service. Management discussed the opportunity with several potential partners but none were found. This, coupled with several quarters of negative cash flow from operations, persuaded Management to impair the asset 100% and the full $231,295 was written off during the last quarter of 2009 and charged to other expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.
  Simultaneous with the Put Option Agreement, see Note 9 - Put Option Payable, entered into on April 1, 2007, the Company also entered into a non-compete agreement with a shareholder.  Under the non-compete agreement the shareholder was to receive quarterly payments totaling $735,000 starting April 1, 2008 ending January 1, 2013. The non-compete agreement was recorded as an intangible asset on the balance sheet with an offsetting liability to recognize the cumulative future payments. The non-compete is amortized on a straight line basis over the term of the agreement and for a period of two years thereafter as stated in the agreement for a total of seven years. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company determined that the carrying value of the non-compete exceeded its fair value and recorded an impairment charge of $139,041.  At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the net balance of the non-compete agreement amounted to $307,209 and $551,250, respectively.
  In September 2007, the Company entered into a license agreement with a vendor for exclusive service in certain markets of Latin America. The license agreement was recorded as an intangible asset and was being amortized on a straight line basis over five years. The License Agreement was deemed impaired at the end of 2009 and accordingly, the remaining net book balance of $76,160 was charged to other expenses during the year ended December 31, 2009 and the related accumulated amortization was charged against the asset.
  Note 8. Other Assets
  Other Assets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are shown below:
 2010

2009Deferred Offering Costs

$
209,419


$
-Security Deposit


81,073



79,269Other Assets, net

$
290,492


$
79,269
  Note 9. Put Option Payable
  On April 1, 2007, the Company and a shareholder entered into a Sale Option Agreement, (the “Shareholder Put Option Agreement”), whereby 3,200,000 options (the “Put Option”) were issued to the shareholder which, when exercised, obligated the Company to purchase and redeem up to 3,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a cash exercise price of $1.00 per share. The shareholder had the right to exercise at any time up to 3,200,000 shares in quarterly increments of up to 160,000 common shares beginning with the quarter ended April 1, 2008. The Put Option expires on January 2, 2013.
  The Company accounted for the Put Option as a liability at inception since the Put Option (a) embodied an obligation to repurchase the equity shares, and (b) required the Company to settle the obligation by transferring assets. The Put Option was measured initially at the fair value of the shares at inception. The fair value was determined by the amount of cash that would be paid under the conditions specified in the agreement if the shares were repurchased immediately. The Company has made subsequent fair value adjustments to the liability at each reporting period to reflect the fair value of the Company’s common shares to be received if the Company were to sell the redeemed shares in the market.  Therefore, the fair value of the Put Option liability consisted of the shares available under the Put Option at a cash exercise price of $1.00 per share, less the market value of the Company’s common stock for such shares on the reporting date.
 
 F - 16
 
 On April 21, 2010, as a condition for entering into the 3% $2.26m Convertible Note (see Note 11 – Convertible Debt), the shareholder agreed to a change of terms within the Shareholder Put Option Agreement.  The shareholder agreed to not exercise the Put Option until the closing price for the Company’s common stock on the principal market on which such common stock trades is greater than $1.00 (subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends and similar events) for 60 consecutive days.  Except for this change, the Shareholder Put Option Agreement will remain in full force and effect in accordance with its respective terms.  From April 2007 to April 2010, the shareholder has put 640,000 shares to the Company at an exercise price of $1.00 per share and the Company has made payments totaling $320,000 to the shareholder.  As of April 21, 2010 immediately before the change in terms, there were 320,000 shares to be redeemed, and 2,560,000 shares remaining that may be put to the Company for purchase and redemption under the Put Option.  As a result of the change in terms, which restrict the shareholder’s right to exercise the Put Option, the Company determined that the put rights requiring the Company’s purchase and redemption of 2,560,000 shares were no longer required to be reflected at fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.  On April 21, 2010, the Company reclassed the liability related to the 2,560,000 shares valued at $2,355,200 based on the closing trading price of the Company’s common shares, to additional paid in capital.  The Company continues to be contingently liable for the remaining 2,560,000 shares under the Put Option.  Should the Company’s trading price remain above $1.00 per common share for 60 consecutive days reinstituting the Put Option rights, then fall below $1.00 per share, a liability would be recognized and charged to earnings in the period.  A summary of the Put Option for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 is as follows:
  December 31, 2008


December 31, 2009


Change inShares


Fair Value


Shares


Fair Value


Fair ValuePut Option exercised

and unpaid


320,000


$
246,400



320,000


$
288,000


$
41,600Remaining Put Option

liability


2,560,000



1,971,200



2,560,000



2,304,000



332,800Total Put Option


2,880,000


$
2,217,600



2,880,000


$
2,592,000


$
374,400
  Effect ofApril 21, 2010December 31, 2009


Adjustment


December 31, 2010


Change inShares


Value


Shares


Value


Shares


Value


Fair ValuePut Option exercised

and unpaid


320,000


$
288,000









320,000


$
300,800


$
12,800Remaining Put Option

liability


2,560,000



2,304,000



-


$
(2,355,200
)


2,560,000



-



51,200Total Put Option


2,880,000


$
2,592,000











2,880,000


$
300,800


$
64,000
  For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized losses in its operating results from adjustments to the fair value of the Put Option in the amount of $64,000 and $374,400, respectively.  The fair value adjustment for the year ended December 31, 2010 was the result of a decrease in the trading price of our common stock from $0.10 per share on December 31, 2009 to $0.06 per share on December 31, 2010.  The fair value adjustment for the year ended December 31, 2009 was the result of a decrease in the trading price of our common stock from $0.23 per share on December 31, 2008 to $0.10 per share on December 31, 2009.
  Note 10. Non-Compete Agreements
  Simultaneous with the Shareholder Put Option Agreement, the Company also entered into a non-compete agreement (the “Shareholder Non-Compete Agreement”) whereby the shareholder was to receive quarterly payments totaling $735,000 beginning April 1, 2008 and ending on January 1, 2013 pursuant to a schedule in the agreement. The Shareholder Non-Compete Agreement was recorded as an intangible asset on the consolidated balance sheets with an offsetting liability to recognize the cumulative future payments.  The agreed-upon value of the non-compete is being amortized on a straight line basis over the term of the agreement and for a period of two years thereafter as stated in the agreement for a total of seven years. See Note 7 - Intangible Assets.
 
 F -17
 
 On April 21, 2010, as a condition for entering into the 3% $2.26m Convertible Note (see Note 11. – Convertible Debt), the shareholder agreed to a change of terms within the Shareholder Non-Compete Agreement.  The shareholder agreed to waive any payments under the Non-Compete Agreement until the Company achieves positive annualized net positive cash flow from operations (determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP after deducting capital expenditures) of at least $750,000 for three consecutive fiscal quarters.  Except for this change, the Shareholder Non-Compete Agreement will remain in full force and effect in accordance with its respective terms.  The Company remains liable for the obligation.
  At the request of the shareholder, the Company made payments on behalf of the shareholder of $47,693 during the year ended December 31, 2010, reducing amounts owed under the Shareholder Non-Compete Agreement.
  At December 31, 2010, amounts due on the liability related to the Shareholder Non-Compete Agreement are as follows:
  Payment

Schedule for

December 31,

Amount2011

$
334,4402012


49,0002013


3,500Total

$
386,940
 
 In addition, at December 31, 2010, the Company’s current liability related to non-compete agreements included $36,300 payable to a minority shareholder of LEL.  Through December 31, 2010, $63,700 has been paid on the LEL non-compete agreement.
  Note 11.  Convertible Debt
  During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company entered into several convertible note agreements.
  3% Convertible Note - $2,260,000 (“3% $2.26m Convertible Note”)
  On May 18, 2010, the Company entered into a Note Purchase Agreement and other agreements with LBI Investments, LLC whereby the Company agreed to issue a 3% senior secured convertible note and warrants for cash proceeds of $2,260,000.  The investment banker was entitled to a transaction fee equal to 7% of gross cash proceeds and 7% of the cash proceeds in the Company’s common stock at $.05 per share. The Company settled the transaction fee with the issuance of a 3% convertible note at $.05 per share with a face value of $316,400 due May 19, 2013.
  The terms of the 3% $2.26m Convertible Note agreements are:
  ●
The note becomes due on May 19, 2013 and bears interest at 3% annually, payable monthly beginning on June 1, 2010.
  ●
The principal of the note and any accrued and unpaid interest are convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at conversion price of $0.05 per share at any time at the option of the note holder. The conversion price is adjustable in the event of any stock split, stock dividend or other recapitalization of the Company.
  ●
In conjunction with the convertible debt agreements, warrants to purchase the equivalent to 20% of the shares issuable upon conversion, or 9,040,000 shares were issued with a strike price of $0.15 per share expiring May 19, 2013.  The warrant exercise price is adjustable in the event of any stock split, stock dividend or other recapitalization of the Company.  These warrants contain a cashless exercise feature.
  ●
The note agreements contain a registration rights agreement whereby the holders may at any time demand registration under the Securities Act.
  ●
The convertible note is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s and PuntoMio’s assets and a guarantee by PuntoMio.
  ●
The note agreements contain various provisions impacting the Company including: (i) a stock reservation provision whereby the Company shall reserve shares of common stock for issuance to the note and warrant holder equal to the number of shares required upon conversion of the note and exercise of the warrant; (ii) restrictions on the payment of dividends, distributions, redemption of stock and warrants, and the making of loans; (iii) participation rights in any subsequent securities offering; (iv) indemnification of certain investor parties; and (v) appointment of four members of our Board of Directors.
 
 F -18
 
 Proceeds of this convertible note were tested for a beneficial conversion feature by comparing the effective conversion price to the fair value of the Company’s stock on the commitment date. After determination of the fair value of the warrants, the Company recognized a beneficial conversion feature of $1,884,732 which was recorded as a discount to the convertible notes with an offset to additional paid-in capital. The fair value of the warrants was determined utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model methodology using assumptions of three years for expected term, volatility of 334.888%, no dividends and a risk free interest rate of 1.59%. The discount related to the warrants for common stock was determined to be $375,268 and recorded as a further reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible debt offset against additional paid-in capital.  Both the beneficial conversion feature and warrant discounts will be amortized over three years and charged to interest expense. However, the Company has elected to disclose the amortization of debt discount separately on the consolidated statements of operations. For the period from issuance to December 31, 2010, amortization of the discount for the beneficial conversion feature and the discount on the warrants amounted to $388,995 and $77,452, respectively.  Interest expense recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010 amounted to $41,980.  As of December 31, 2010, the entire $2,260,000 convertible note is outstanding and is carried at $466,447 net of discounts in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
  3% Convertible Note - $316,400 (“3% $316k Convertible Note”)
  With respect to the May 18, 2010 Note Purchase Agreement with LBI Investments, LLC, the broker fee was 14% of the note principal. The Company entered into a $316,400 convertible note agreement with the broker. The Company recorded the broker fee payable by allocating the fair value of the fee related to the warrant discount of $52,522 to additional paid-in capital and capitalizing the remainder to Other Asset – Debt Issuance Cost for $263,878.  The debt issuance cost will be amortized to financing fees over the life of the convertible note.
  The terms of the 3% $316k Convertible Note agreement are:
  ●
The note becomes due on May 19, 2013 and bears interest of 3% annually, payable monthly beginning on June 1, 2010.
  ●
The principal of the note and accrued and unpaid interest are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.05 per share.
  ●
The notes provide for 20% warrant coverage with a strike price of $0.15 per share and expire on May 19, 2013.  Warrants to purchase 1,265,600 shares of common stock at $0.15 per share have been issued and are outstanding at December 31, 2010.
  The Company tested the $316,400 convertible note for a beneficial conversion feature by comparing the effective conversion price to the fair value of the Company’s stock on the commitment date. The Company recognized a beneficial conversion feature of $263,862 which was recorded as a discount to the convertible notes with an offset to additional paid-in capital. The fair value of the warrants was determined utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model methodology using assumptions of three years for expected term, volatility of 334.888%, no dividends and a risk free interest rate of 1.59%. The discount related to the warrants for common stock was determined to be $52,538 and recorded as a further reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible debt offset against additional paid-in capital.  Both the beneficial conversion feature and warrant discounts will be amortized over three years and charged to interest expense.  However, the Company has elected to disclose the amortization of debt discount separately on the consolidated statements of operations. For the period from issuance to December 31, 2010, amortization of the discount for the beneficial conversion feature and the discount on the warrants amounted to $54,459 and $10,841, respectively.  Interest expense recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010 amounted to $5,876.  As of December 31, 2010, the entire $316,400 convertible note is outstanding and is carried at $65,300 net of discounts in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
  2% Convertible Notes - $402,000 and $95,000
  On March 15, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Falcon Consulting to raise up to $500,000 through the sale of convertible notes. In March and April 2010, the Company entered into convertible note agreements with several investors of the Company totaling $497,000. The terms of the convertible note agreements were:
  ●
Maturity date was July 15, 2010 or completion of a financing event in the amount of $4,000,000 or greater.
  ●
Annual interest rate of 2%, payable annually and to accrue beginning on April 1, 2010.
  ●
The convertible note holders had the option to convert the notes into shares of the Company’s stock at a conversion ratio of $.05 per $1.00 of principal outstanding, at any time.
  F -19
  ●
The notes provided for 20% warrant coverage with a strike price of $0.05 per share expiring March 15, 2011.  As of December 31, 2010, 1,988,000 warrants have been issued and are outstanding.
  Proceeds of $497,000 from these convertible notes were tested for a beneficial conversion feature by comparing the effective conversion price to the fair value of the Company’s stock on the commitment date. The Company recognized a beneficial conversion feature of $198,800 which was recorded as a discount to the convertible notes with an offset to additional paid-in capital. The fair value of the warrants was determined utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model methodology using assumptions of one year for expected term, volatility of 390.53%, no dividends and a risk free interest rate of .41%. The discount related to the warrants for common stock was determined to be $79,865 and recorded as a further reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible debt offset against additional paid-in capital.
  In May 2010, the $497,000 convertible note holders converted the principal plus accrued interest of $1,483 owed to them into 9,969,660 shares of common stock at the $0.05 conversion price.
  The private placement agent, Falcon Consulting, earned a cash fee comprised of 7% of the total monies raised or $34,790.  The amount was allocated to additional paid-in-capital and debt issuance costs based on the relative fair values of the conversion feature and the warrants resulting in a $5,592 charged to additional paid-in capital and the remaining $29,198 to debt issuance cost. These amounts were being amortized through July 15, 2010; however, the remaining amount of $21,595 was expensed upon conversion on May 19, 2010.
  In addition, Falcon Consulting was entitled to receive 7% of any common shares issued upon conversion of the notes through July 15, 2010.
  On May 20, 2010, Falcon was issued 697,876 shares of common stock upon conversion of these notes valued at $55,830 based on the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on that date.  These shares were deemed to be placement fees related to the sale of issuance of common stock and thus were charged to additional paid-in capital.  In total, 10,667,527 shares of common stock were issued for the $497,000 convertible debt.  None of this debt is outstanding at December 31, 2010. The unamortized discounts of $147,027 and $73,626 related to the remaining beneficial conversion features and the warrants, respectively, were charged to expense during quarter ended June 30, 2010 while $58,012 of amortization expense was recognized for the period from January 1, 2010 through the date of conversion.
  18% Convertible Note Payable - $100,000
  On March 8, 2010, the Company entered into a note agreement for $100,000. Terms of the note payable were:
  ●
Discount granted at issuance of 3% charged to expense.
  ●
Interest on the unpaid principal at 1.5% per month, which was payable monthly.
  ●
Maturity date was May 7, 2010, subsequently extended to June 7, 2010.
  ●
Note was secured by the Company’s accounts receivable to the extent of the amount owed.
  ●
Lender had option to convert 100% of the note payable to Company’s common shares at a conversion price of $0.10 per share.
  The proceeds of $97,000 were received March 8, 2010 and the convertible note was tested for a beneficial conversion feature at the time of issuance by comparing the effective conversion price to the fair value of the Company’s stock. The $3,000 discount was amortized into expense and included in amortization of discounts on the consolidated statements of operations.  The Company determined that the 18%, $100,000 convertible note payable did not have an embedded beneficial conversion feature and thus did not recognize any reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible debt.  In May 2010, the Company repaid the note payable with $100,000 cash proceeds from the 3% $2.26m Convertible Note.  The Company incurred and paid $3,592 of interest expense related to this note.
  3% Convertible Note Payable - $150,000
  On May 7, 2010, the Company entered into a convertible note agreement for $150,000. Terms of this note payable were:
  ●
Interest on the unpaid principal accrued at 3% annually.
  F -20
  ●
The loan was due on demand.
  ●
Note was secured by the Company’s assets including accounts receivable to the extent of the amount owed.
  ●
Lender had option to convert 100% of the note payable to Company’s common shares at a conversion price of $0.05 per share.
  The proceeds of $150,000 were received on May 8, 2010 and the convertible note was tested for a beneficial conversion feature at the time of issuance by comparing the effective conversion price to the fair value of the Company’s stock. The Company determined that the 3%, $150,000 convertible note payable did have an embedded beneficial conversion feature.  However, the 3% $2.26m Convertible Note was used to pay this 3% $150,000 note payable in full and since the 3% $150,000 loan was repaid within twelve days as expected, the Company reversed the discount and no interest was incurred or expensed.
  3% Convertible Note - $25,000 (“3% $25k Convertible Note”)
  In November 2010, the Company issued a $25,000 Convertible Note.  The terms of the 3% $25k Convertible Note agreements are:
  ●
The note becomes due on November 9, 2013 and bears interest at 3% annually, payable monthly beginning on December 1, 2010.
  ●
The principal of the note and any accrued and unpaid interest are convertible into shares of the common stock of the Company at conversion price of $0.05 per share at any time at the option of the note holder. The conversion price is adjustable in the event of any stock split, stock dividend or other recapitalization of the Company.
  ●
In conjunction with the convertible debt agreements, warrants to purchase an equivalent of 20% of the shares issuable upon conversion, or 100,000 shares were issued with a strike price of $0.15 per share expiring November 9, 2013.  The warrant exercise price is adjustable in the event of any stock split, stock dividend or other recapitalization of the Company.  These warrants contain a cashless exercise feature.
  ●
The note agreements contain a registration rights agreement whereby the holders may at any time demand registration under the Securities Act.
  ●
The convertible note is secured by a lien on substantially all of the Company’s and PuntoMio’s assets and a guarantee by PuntoMio.
  ●
The note agreements contain various provisions impacting the Company including: (i) a stock reservation provision whereby the Company shall reserve shares of common stock for issuance to the note and warrant holder equal to the number of shares required upon conversion of the note and exercise of the warrant; (ii) restrictions on the payment of dividends, distributions, redemption of stock and warrants, and the making of loans; (iii) participation rights in any subsequent securities offering; (iv) indemnification of certain investor parties; and (v) appointment of four members of the Company’s Board of Directors.
  Proceeds of this convertible note were tested for a beneficial conversion feature by comparing the effective conversion price to the fair value of the Company’s stock on the commitment date. After determination of the fair value of the warrants, the Company recognized a beneficial conversion feature of $20,896 which was recorded as a discount to the convertible notes with an offset to additional paid-in capital. The fair value of the warrants was determined utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model methodology using assumptions of three years for expected term, volatility of 281.09%, no dividends and a risk free interest rate of 0.66%. The discount related to the warrants for common stock was determined to be $4,104 and recorded as a further reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible debt offset against additional paid-in capital.  Both the beneficial conversion feature and warrant discounts will be amortized over three years and charged to interest expense. However, the Company has elected to disclose the amortization of debt discount separately on the consolidated statements of operations. For the period from issuance to December 31, 2010, amortization of the discount for the beneficial conversion feature and the discount on the warrants amounted to $976 and $192, respectively.  Interest expense recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010 amounted to $107.  As of December 31, 2010, the entire $25,000 convertible note is outstanding and is carried at $1,168 net of discounts in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
 F -21
 
 Below is a summary of convertible debt outstanding as of December 31, 2010:
  Amount Due and Discounts at Issuance


Amount Due and Discounts at December
31, 2010Convertible SecurityDescription

Amount Due


Beneficial

Conversion

Feature


Warrants


Net Amount


Amount Due


Unamortized

Discounts


Net Amount3% $2.26m Convertible Note


2,260,000



1,884,732



375,268



-



2,260,000



1,793,553



466,4473% $316k Convertible Note


316,400



263,862



52,538



-



316,400



251,100



65,3003% $25k Convertible Note


25,000



20,896



4,104



-



25,000



23,832



1,168$
2,601,400


$
2,169,490


$
431,910


$
-


$
2,601,400


$
2,068,485


$
532,915
  Note 12.  Stock-Based Compensation
  Common Stock Awards
  The Company recognized $247,998 and $258,865, net of estimated forfeitures of $79,948 and $0, of share-based compensation expense during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  As of December 31, 2010, the future compensation expense related to awarded, non-vested stock that will be recognized is $131,092, and this amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.39 years.   A summary of the Company’s non-vested stock as of December 31, 2010 is presented below:
  WeightedAverage Grant-Grant Date


Date Fair Value


UnamortizedShares


Fair Value


(per share)


ValueNonvested at December 31, 2009


688,046


$
-


$
0.55


$
380,023Awarded


3,957,200



221,100



0.06



131,092Vested


(2,795,246
)


-



0.49



(367,352
)Forfeited


(200,000)



-



0.15



(12,671)Nonvested at December 31, 2010


1,650,000


$
221,100


$
0.12


$
131,092
  On June 18, 2010, 1,200,000 restricted shares with a three year vesting period were awarded to members of the Board of Directors valued at $156,000 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on that date. These shares were issued on August 16, 2010.  During the three months ended June 30, 2010 our Board of Directors granted 495,000 shares of common stock to prior members of the Board of Directors for services, of which 345,000 were for prior services and vested immediately and 150,000 shares will vest and be issued after one-year of continued service.  The fully vested shares were valued at $24,600 based on the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and charged to compensation expense.  The 150,000 shares that vest over one-year were valued at $10,500 and will be charged to expense over the one-year vesting period.  In August 2010, the Company granted and issued employees 2,262,200 shares of common stock valued at $226,220 based on their grant-date fair value, 300,000 of which are restricted shares subject to a three-year vesting period and 856,300 of which were issued to settled previously accrued payroll.   In August 2010 the Company also issued 100,000 shares of common stock that were granted to an employee in February 2009 and became fully vested in February 2010.
  The July 2008 stock compensation plan authorized 5,000,000 shares for issuance and since then, a total of 4,445,246 shares have been granted.  Therefore, 554,754 shares of common stock are available for issuance from the current stock compensation plan.
  Note 13. Fair Value Measurements
  The Company carries various assets and liabilities at fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Fair value is defined as the amount that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
  Level I: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets and liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.
  F -22
  Level II: Observable market data, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, such as interest rates and yield curves.
  Level III: Unobservable inputs when there is little or no market data available, thereby requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
  The following table presents the Company’s financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, for each fair value hierarchy level.
 Put Option LiabilityDecember 31, 2010


December 31, 2009Level I

$
300,800


$
2,592,000Level II


-



-Level III


-



-Total

$
300,800


$
2,592,000
  Note 14. Common and Preferred Stock
  Effective July 16, 2010, the Company is authorized to issue 350,000,000 common shares (an increase of 200,000,000 from 150,000,000 authorized shares at June 30, 2010) with a par value of $0.001 and 50,000,000 preferred shares with par value $0.001.
  On January 28, 2009, the Company executed an engagement letter with Falcon Consulting under which Falcon Consulting would, on a best efforts basis, raise up to $2 million through the sale of new shares of common stock of the Company at $.10 per share (the “Quarter One 2009 Private Placement”). The Company received $963,000 for the purchase of 9,630,000 shares of common stock related to the quarter one capital raise. In addition to the cash fee paid to Falcon Consulting, the Company issued Falcon 963,000 shares for their efforts in connection with the private placement. Finally, in addition to the 963,000 shares, Falcon also earned another 100,000 shares as part of this raise and such shares were issued to Eagle Capital, on Falcon Consulting’s request, during the fourth quarter of 2009. Eagle Capital assisted Falcon Capital with the quarter one 2009 private placement.
  On June 26, 2009, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, PuntoMio, executed a new engagement agreement with Falcon Consulting under which Falcon Consulting would raise up to $2 million through the sale of units consisting of one preferred share of PuntoMio plus one warrant to purchase one common share of the Company, at an exercise price of $.10 expiring July 1, 2012, at $1.00 per unit. The Company sold 1,090,000 units and received proceeds of $966,021 net of placement fees paid to Falcon Consulting. In addition to the cash fee paid to Falcon Consulting, the Company issued Falcon Consulting 284,345 PuntoMio preferred shares for their efforts in connection with the private placement. The issuance of the preferred shares was a non-cash transaction that exclusively affected the additional paid in capital and preferred shares accounts. At December 31, 2009, PuntoMio has 5,928,145 common and preferred shares issued and outstanding. At December 31, 2009, the Company owns all of PuntoMio’s common stock, has a 75.9% ownership in PuntoMio and there exists a 24.1% non-controlling interest in PuntoMio.
  PuntoMio’s preferred stock has $.001 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized, 1,428,145 and zero shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of PuntoMio, the holders of the preferred stock have preference to receive distribution before any payment is made to common stockholders. They also have preference to any dividends that may be declared. Finally, preferred stock holders have equal equity interest as PuntoMio common stock holders but do not have voting rights.
  In September 2009, the Company agreed to convert $32,000 of advisor fees payable into 320,000 shares of common stock at $0.10, the value of the quarter one 2009 private placement. Also in September 2009, PuntoMio agreed to convert $45,192 of PuntoMio director fee payable into 53,800 shares of PuntoMio preferred stock for director services provided by Mr. van Houweninge. These shares were valued at $0.84 based on a valuation prepared for the quarter three 2009 PuntoMio private placement.
  During the year ended December 30, 2010, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $100,000 by the parties as partial settlement of a trade payable.  The Company converted 2% $497,000 convertible notes, including related interest and fees into 10,667,527 shares of common stock, more fully described in Note 11 - Convertible Debt.  Also, during the year ended December 31, 2010, the Board of Directors approved grants of 345,000 shares to Directors for their past service valued at $24,600 more fully described in Note 12 – Stock-Based Compensation.
  Effective April 30, 2010, the Company entered into an equity exchange agreement with the non-controlling shareholders of PuntoMio (the PuntoMio Exchange”).  The PuntoMio Exchange provides for the exchange of the entire subsidiary preferred equity interest for Company preferred convertible stock at an exchange of 1:8.  In addition to the PuntoMio Exchange, the Company agreed to redeem 1,090,000 warrants expiring July 1, 2012 for $0.10 per warrant or $109,000.  More information regarding the warrants affected in the PuntoMio Exchange is more fully described in Note15 - Warrants.
  F -23
  On April 30, 2010, the Company exchanged 1,428,145 preferred shares of a Company’s subsidiary for 11,425,160 shares of the Company’s preferred convertible stock and fully eliminated the non-controlling interest in the subsidiary.  The disposition of the non-controlling interest required the Company to reclassify the losses accumulated from the sale of the non-controlling interest through the PuntoMio Exchange date from Non-Controlling Interest to Accumulated Deficit.  From September 30, 2009 through April 30, 2010, $173,853 losses were attributable to the non-controlling interest.  Furthermore, the equity attributable to the non-controlling interest at inception of $57,401 was eliminated as part of the disposition of the non-controlling interest in PuntoMio.  The Company valued the 11,425,160 preferred convertible shares issued in the exchange based on the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on April 30, 2010.  Despite certain preferences within the terms of the preferred convertible stock (see below), the Company believes that the closing price on the Company’s common stock on the date of the exchange provides a reasonable approximation of the value of the preferred convertible stock.  The difference between the carrying value of the subsidiary stock and the value of the common stock on commitment date in the amount of $798,333 was reflected as a deemed dividend and was charged to additional paid-in capital.
  Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holders of the preferred convertible stock have preference to receive distribution before any payment is made to common stockholders.  The holders also have preference to any dividends that may be declared and have equal equity interest as common stockholders but do not have voting rights.  Convertible preferred stockholders have the right to convert to common stock on a 1:1 ratio at anytime with written notice.  Finally, the Company may force the preferred convertible stockholder to convert their shares into common stock at the stated 1:1 ratio if the stock trades at an amount greater than $0.30 for 20 consecutive trading days.  If the Company, at any time after the issue date, subdivides by stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, reclassification or otherwise, the outstanding shares of common stock into a greater number of shares, then after the date of record for effecting such subdivision, the number of conversion shares issuable upon a conversion of a preferred convertible share in effect immediately prior to such subdivision will be proportionately increased. If the Company, at any time after the issue date, combines (by reverse stock split, recapitalization, reorganization, reclassification or otherwise) the outstanding shares of common stock into a smaller number of shares, then, after the date of record for effecting such combination, the number of conversion shares issuable upon a conversion of a preferred convertible share in effect immediately prior to such combination will be proportionately reduced.
  In August 2010, holders of 10,065,160 shares of the Company’s preferred stock converted their preferred stock into an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s common stock.  As of December 31, 2010, 1,360,000 shares of preferred stock remain outstanding.
  In November and December of 2010, the Company obtained subscriptions for the sale of 22,420,000 shares of common stock and warrants to acquire 4,484,000 shares of common stock for net proceeds of $1,008,900, net of offering costs of $95,100 paid in 2010 and $17,000 paid in 2011.  The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $1,121,000 to the common stock and warrants based on their relative fair values.  $791,586 of the gross proceeds were allocated to the common stock, which are included in Subscribed stock on the consolidated balance sheets of the Company’s financial statements.  $329,414 of the gross proceeds were allocated to the warrants and charged to additional paid in capital.  The Company received $1,036,000 of the gross proceeds in 2010.  The Company received $85,000 of the gross proceeds in 2011 which are included in Subscriptions receivable on the consolidated balance sheets of the Company’s financial statements.The Company also agreed to issue 2,242,000 shares of common stock as consideration for offering costs.  These shares were issued subsequent to December 31, 2010.
  Note 15. Warrants
  In 2009, 1,090,000 warrants were issued as part of the third quarter 2009 private placement with an exercise price of $0.10 per share and an expiration date of July 1, 2012.  These warrants were redeemed on April 30, 2010 for $109,000.
  Falcon Consulting and others earned 2,653,195 warrants with an exercise price of $0.50 as fees for 2008 private placement and bridge loans.  These warrants were valued at $188,144 and have an expiration date of March 11, 2011.  During 2009, 456,029 of these warrants were cancelled and in exchange for the issuance of 100,000 common shares.  December 31, 2010 and 2009, 2,197,166 warrants payable to Falcon Consulting remain outstanding.
  In May 2010, warrants were issued as part of the 3% $2.26m Convertible Note agreements. The note agreements provide for the issuance of detachable warrants to purchase an equivalent to 20% of the shares issuable upon conversion of the notes, or 9,040,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share and expiring on May 19, 2013.  In addition, a broker fee resulted from the issuance of the 3% $2.26m convertible note amounting to 14% of the principal of the notes, or $316,400, and the Company entered into convertible note and warrant agreements for this obligation.  In May 2010, warrants to acquire 1,265,600 shares of common stock were issued as part of the 3% $316k Convertible Note issuance with a strike price of $0.15 per share and expiring on May 19, 2013.    These warrants contain anti-dilution provisions and a cashless exercise feature.  As of December 31, 2010, 10,305,600 warrants to purchase an equivalent number of common shares related to the 3% $2.26m Convertible Note and broker fee remain outstanding. These warrants were recorded and valued in conjunction with their respective issuance of convertible notes – See Note 11 – Convertible Debt.
  F -24
  During March and April 2010, warrants were issued as part of the 2% $402,000 and 2% $95,000 Convertible Note agreements. The note agreements provide for the issuance of detachable warrants equivalent to 20% of the principal of the notes with a strike price of $0.05 per share and expiring March 15, 2011.  As of December 31, 2010, 1,988,000 warrants to purchase 1,988,000 common shares at $0.05 per share are outstanding.  These warrants were recorded and valued in conjunction with the issuance of the convertible notes – See Note 11 – Convertible Debt.
  In November 2010, warrants were issued as part of the 3% $25k Convertible Note agreements. The note agreements provide for the issuance of detachable warrants equivalent to 20% of the shares issuable upon conversion of the notes, or 100,000 warrants, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share and expiring on November 9, 2013.  These warrants contain anti-dilution provisions and a cashless exercise feature.  As of December 31, 2010, 100,000 warrants to purchase an equivalent number of common shares related to the 3% $25k Convertible Note remain outstanding. These warrants were recorded and valued in conjunction with their respective issuance of convertible notes – See Note 11 – Convertible Debt.
  In connection with thesale of 22,420,000 shares of common stock in November and December of 2010, the Company agreed to issue warrants to acquire 4,484,000 shares of common stock for an exercise price of $0.15 per share expiring on November 15, 2012.  See Note 14 – Common and Preferred Stock.
  A summary of all warrants outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and changes to warrants issued during the years then ended, are as follows:
 Warrants


Exercise

Price ($)


Proceeds Upon

Exercise or

Redemption

Expiration

DatesOutstanding at December 31, 2008


2,197,166



0.50


$
1,098,583

March 11, 2011Awarded


1,090,000



0.10



109,000

July 1, 2012Exercised


-



-



-Forfeited


-



-



-Outstanding at December 31, 2009


3,287,166



0.37



1,207,583Awarded


1,608,000



0.05



80,400

March 15, 2011Awarded


380,000



0.05



19,000

March 15, 2011Awarded


9,040,000



0.15



1,356,000

May 19, 2013Awarded


1,265,600



0.15



189,840

May 19, 2013Awarded


100,000



0.15



15,000

November 9, 2013Awarded


4,484,000



0.15



672,600

November 15, 2012Exercised


-



-



-Redeemed


(1,090,000
)


(0.10)



(109,000
)
July 1, 2012Forfeited


-



-



-Outstanding at December 31, 2010


19,074,766






$
3,431,423
  Note 16. Income Taxes
  The actual income tax expense for 2010 and 2009 differs from the statutory tax expense for the year (computed by applying the U.S. federal corporate tax rate of 34% to income before provision for income taxes) as follows:
 2010


EffectiveTax Rate


2009


EffectiveTax RateFederal taxes at statutory rate

$
(1,354,131
)


34.00
%

$
(1,475,314
)


34.00
%State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit


(131,239
)


3.30



(132,630
)


3.18Other permanent differences


124,899



(3.14
)


233,047



(4.16
)Prior year true up


209,393



(5.26
)


-



-Change in valuation allowance


1,151,078



(28.90
)


1,374,897



(33.02
)Total

$
-



-
%

$
-



-
%
 
 F -25
 
 The Company’s deferred tax assets are as follows:
 2010


2009Deferred tax assets:Depreciation and other

$
154,447


$
151,958Allowance for doubtful accounts


18,697



16,389Net operating loss carryover


8,339,168



7,192,8888,512,312



7,361,235Less: Valuation allowance


(8,512,312
)


(7,361,235
)Net deferred tax asset

$
-


$
-
  As of December 31, 2010, the Company has available approximately $22,160,000 of operating loss carryforwards before applying the provision of IRC Section 382, which may be used in the future filings of the Company’s tax returns to offset future taxable income for United States income tax purposes. Net operating losses expire beginning in the year 2022. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company has determined that due to the uncertainty regarding profitability in the near future, a 100% valuation allowance is needed with regards to the deferred tax assets. Changes in the estimated tax benefit that will be realized from the tax loss carryforwards and other temporary differences will be recognized in the financial statement in the years in which those changes occur.
  Under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code Section 382, an ownership change is deemed to have occurred if the percentage of stock owned by one or more 5-percent shareholders has increased, in the aggregate, by more than 50 percentage points over the lowest percentage of stock owned by said shareholders at any time during a three year testing period. Once an ownership change is deemed to have occurred under Section 382, a limitation on the annual utilization of net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards is imposed and therefore, a portion of the tax loss carryforwards would be subject to the limitation under Section 382. SkyPostal Networks, Inc. acquisition of SkyPostal, Inc. on April 15, 2008 (see Note 1) and various other equity transactions resulted in an ownership change pursuant to Section 382.  The utilization of the $11,946,000 net operating loss as of April 15, 2008 is limited under IRC Section 382.
  Carryback option was relinquished since the Company did not have prior year income and to preserve the right to carry forward net operating losses going forward.
  The U.S. Federal jurisdiction and Florida are the major tax jurisdictions where the company files income tax returns. The Company does not anticipate U.S. Federal or State examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007.
  Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies
  In July 2009, the Company consolidated and renegotiated the two Miami leases for SkyPostal Networks, Inc. and PuntoMio into one Miami facility. The new lease is a non-cancellable operating lease that expires on June 2015. Rent expense under the new lease was $125,878 and $47,253, for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
  Rental expense under the previous leases terminated without penalty in June 2009 was $134,252 for the year ended December 31, 2009.
  The future minimum rental payments under these leases for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2010 are as follows:
 2011

$
52,8302012


61,1642013


69,4922014


77,8202015


40,992Total

$
302,298
  Litigation
  The Company may become a party to various claims, legal actions and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of Management, there were no matters that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements taken as whole as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009