alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Registrant's Specimen Certificate for Ordinary shares




	
	 Exhibit 4.2
  
 




 HOME INNS & HOTELS MANAGEMENT INC. 
 (Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands) 
 Number 
 Specimen 
 Ordinary Shares 
 US$1,000,000.00 divided into 200,000,000 shares of US$0.005 each, comprised of 
 177,075,114 ordinary shares
of par value US$0.005 each, 
 17,241,400 Series A Preference Shares of par value US$0.005 each, 
 2,417,645 Series B Preference Shares of par value US$0.005 each and 
 3,265,841 Series C Preference Shares of par value US$0.005 each 
 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT 
 is the registered 
 holder of 
 Ordinary Shares 
 in the above-named Company subject to the memorandum and
articles of association thereof. 
 EXECUTED for and on behalf of the Company on 2006. 
 DIRECTOR 
  

			
	 ©GOES 740
 All Rights Reserved
	  	 LITHO. IN U.S.A









 THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO AND MAY ONLY BE SOLD, DISPOSED OF OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED IN
COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN RIGHTS OF FIRST REFUSAL AND RIGHTS OF CO-SALE AS SET FORTH IN A SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 29, 2006 ENTERED INTO AMONG THE PARTIES THERETO (THE “SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT’). A COPY OF SUCH AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
AT THE REGISTERED OFFICE OF THE COMPANY. SUCH RIGHTS OF FIRST REFUSAL AND RIGHTS OF CO-SALE ARE BINDING ON CERTAIN TRANSFEREES OF THESE SHARES. 
 THE SHARES
REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO A 180-DAY MARKET STAND-OFF RESTRICTION AS SET FORTH IN THE SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT. AS A RESULT OF SUCH AGREEMENT, THESE SHARES MAY NOT BE TRADED PRIOR TO 180 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE INITIAL
PUBLIC OFFERING OF THE ORDINARY SHARES OF THE ISSUER HEREOF. SUCH RESTRICTION IS BINDING ON TRANSFEREES OF THESE SHARES. 
 TRANSFER

  

					
	I	  		  	(the Transferor) for the value received
			
	DO HEREBY transfer to	  	

	  	(the Transferee) the
			
		  		  	shares standing in my name in the

 undertaking called HOME INNS & HOTELS MANAGEMENT INC. 
 To hold the same unto the Transferee 
 Dated 
 Signed by the Transferor 
 in the presence of: 
  

					
	  
	 		 	  

	Witness	 		 	Transferor
National Shipper Advisory Committee to Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) 

Sub-Committee: Data & Visibility

Opening: Reduce data complexity and opacity within the supply chain by requiring consistent data points, 

processes and practices between Ocean Carriers, and Marine Terminal Operators (MTOs). 

Purpose: Consistency and alignment of data between Ocean Carriers, and MTOs, especially as pertains to 

milestones on the pick-up and return of containers both loaded and empty. 

Part of the complexity is currently witnessed in the misalignment of Alliances and VSA members’ data 

when calling a US port. Most times, a vessel calling the same port will have two, three or four different 

Early Return Dates, and Documentation and Physical Cutoff Dates, depending on the carrier that issues 

the booking confirmation. Alliances and VSAs members communicate different dates for the same vessel 

calling the same port. Moreover, these data points are different both upstream and downstream to the 

MTOs in the network.

This recommendation serves to expand on the previously submitted recommendations: Shipment Level 

Data Alignment, Container Level Data Alignment, Intermodal Level Data Alignment submitted on 

December 8, 2022, the ERD Recommendation discussed on August 10, 2022. 

Recommendation: Require Ocean Carriers and their subcontracted parties, i.e., MTOs, rail carriers, 

chassis providers, container depots, etc. to publish consistent, aligned, and timely data on the following 

data elements: 

Export Cargo: 

• Empty pickup container yard location 

• Empty pickup date 

• Documentation Cutoff 

• Physical Cutoff
• Loaded container location and earliest return date 

• Loaded container ingate return 

Import Cargo: 

• Container pickup available date 

• Container last free port demurrage date 

• Container last free equipment detention date 

• Empty container return yard location options
#### Nicholas LESLIE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles MULE, Facilities Director, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility; William Cleary, District Director, DRO Field Office; Eric J. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 10-2115-pr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 23, 2011.

*30Nicholas Leslie, Batavia, NY, pro se.

Gail Y. Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney (William J. Hoehul, Jr., United States Attorney), Office of the United States Attorney for the Western District of New York, Buffalo, NY, for Respondents-Appellees.

PRESENT: ROGER J. MINER, JOSÉ A. CABRANES, CHESTER J. STRAUB, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Nicholas Leslie, *pro se,*appeals from the May 6, 2010 judgment of the District Court denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this action.

We review *de novo*a district court’s denial of a § 2241 petition. *See Rankine v. Reno,*319 F.3d 93, 98 (2d Cir.2003). 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3) authorizes a district court to consider the legal claims of a prisoner who is “in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.”

Although the law provides that when an alien is ordered removed, the Attorney General must remove the alien within a period of 90 days, a habeas petitioner’s due process rights “are not jeopardized by his continued detention as long as his removal remains reasonably foreseeable.” *Wang v. Ashcroft,*320 F.3d 130, 146 (2d Cir.2003) (citing *Zadvydas v. Davis,*533 U.S. 678, 699-701, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001)). In *Zadvydas,*the Supreme Court held that six months of detention, following a final order of removal, is presumptively constitutional, but the Court also held that the presumption “does not mean that every alien not removed must be released after six months.” *Zadvydas,*533 U.S. at 701, 121 S.Ct. 2491. “To the contrary, an alien may be held in confinement until it has been determined that there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future.” *Id.*“After this 6-month period, once the alien provides good reason to believe that there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future, the Government must respond with evidence sufficient to rebut that showing.” *Id.*

In this case, Leslie has not demonstrated that there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future. Leslie has been detained well beyond the six-month period found presumptively reasonable; however, the evidence presented to the District Court and this Court by the respondent indicates that the delay in processing Leslie’s removal has been caused by his own refusal to cooperate and his false claims of United States citizenship. Petitioner has not provided this Court with any authority or evidence demonstrating that the District Court’s findings were incorrect. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

*CONCLUSION*

For the reasons stated above, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form  10-QSB/A for the Quarter  Ended June 30, 2004 (the  "Report") by
National Coal Corp.  ("Registrant"),  each of the undersigned  hereby  certifies
that:

1.   to  the  best  of  our  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
     requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934; and

2.   to the best of our  knowledge,  the  information  contained  in the  Report
     fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and
     results of operations of Registrant.





                                     /s/ Jon Nix
Date:  December 9, 2004              -------------------------
                                     Jon Nix
                                     President and
                                     Chief Executive Officer





                                     /s/ Robert Chmiel
Date:  December 9, 2004              -------------------------
                                     Robert Chmiel
                                     Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00226-CV

Sue Cook, Appellant

v.

Trinity Universal Insurance Company, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-03-000680, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Sue Cook filed a motion requesting that her appeal be dismissed. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

_____________________________________

Diane Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: May 29, 2007
#### Pablo SILVA-RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Warden Terry O’BRIEN, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 10-6848.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 30, 2010.

Pablo Silva-Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

*847Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pablo Silva-Rodriguez, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Silva-Rodriguez v. O'Brien,*No. 7:09-cv-00497-jct-mfu, 2010 WL 2326539 (W.D.Va. June 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC, Appellant

v.

INTELLECTUAL PIXELS LIMITED, Appellee

______________________

2022

- 1546

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020

- 01248.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J AMES M URPHY D OWD

, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by H ENRY N IKOGOSYAN ; M ARK D ONNELL F LANAGAN

, J OSEPH F. H AAG , Palo Alto, CA.

D OUGLAS R. W ILSON

, Armond Wilson LLP, Austin, TX,

a rgued for appellee. Also represented by M ICHELLE A RMOND

, J OSEPHER L I

, P ATRICK M ALONEY , Newport Beach,
CA.

______________________ Case: 22-1546 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 09/08/2023T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK

, P ROST

, and S TOLL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 8, 2023
Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow
Jarrett B. Perlow
Clerk of Court Case: 22-1546 Document: 39 Page: 2 Filed: 09/08/2023
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**782 CAF 15-00692**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF KRISTIN M. DAWLEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SEAN T. DAWLEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

PAUL B. WATKINS, FAIRPORT, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

MICHELLE M. SCUDERI, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, WATERTOWN.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County (Peter A. Schwerzmann, A.J.), entered March 24, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed with prejudice the petition of petitioner seeking to modify a prior consent order with respect to respondent’s visitation with the subject children.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: In appeal No. 2, petitioner mother appeals from an order that dismissed with prejudice her petition seeking to modify a prior consent order with respect to respondent father’s visitation with the subject children. While this appeal was pending, Family Court entered an order upon the consent of the parties that resolved the relevant visitation issues, thereby rendering this appeal moot ( see Matter of Warren v Hibbs , 136 AD3d 1306, 1306, lv denied 27 NY3d 909). We conclude that the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply ( see id. ; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne , 50 NY2d 707, 714-715).

The mother has not raised any contentions with respect to the order in appeal No. 1, and we therefore dismiss that appeal ( see Abasciano v Dandrea , 83 AD3d 1542, 1545; see generally Ciesinski v Town of Aurora , 202 AD2d 984, 984).

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Carl Savoy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/csavoy\/","title":"Commission Meeting Scheduled for May 18, 2022","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fCWEsbK3Mt\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-may-18-2022\/\">Commission Meeting Scheduled for May 18, 2022<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-may-18-2022\/embed\/#?secret=fCWEsbK3Mt\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Scheduled for May 18, 2022” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"fCWEsbK3Mt\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Ocean Transportation Intermediary 

Foreign NVOCC Registration Terminations/Suspensions

February 2017

Compass Ocean Logistics LLC

Org No.: 022273

Address: P.O. Box 42558, Saba Tower-1, 5th Floor

Unit 507, Jumeira Lake Towers

Dubai

United Arab Emirates

Termination: February 17, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Empire Logistics Co., Ltd

Org No.: 023208

Address: No. 80-82, 3

rd Floor, Phan Xich Long Street

Ward 2, Phu Nhuan District

Ho Chi Minh

Vietnam

Termination: February 15, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Hecny Transportation Limited

Org No.: 021528

Address: 10/F, Hecny Cargo Building

111 Wai Yip Street

Kwun Tong

Hong Kong

Termination: February 25, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Hyundai Logistics Co., Ltd.

Org No.: 012682

Address: 194, Yulgok-Ro, Jongno-Gu

Seoul

South Korea

Termination: February 10, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond
Jetson International Logistics

Org No.: 025370

Address: 5FL-2, No. 169-6, Section 2

Chang An East Road, Zhongshan District

Taipei

Taiwan

Termination: February 20, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Mainfreight International (PTY) LTD

Org No.: 018572

Address: 154 Melrose Drive

Tullamarine, Victoria 3043

Australia

Termination: February 19, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Maltese Line Limited

Org No.: 026275

Address: 90 Triq IT Tankijiet

Brizebbuga, BBG 1716

Malta

Termination: February 9, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

NTL Co., Ltd. dba NTL

Org No.: 025190

Address: No. 609, The 2nd Isbiz Tower, 23

Seonyu-Ro 49-Gil, Yeongdeungpo-Gu

Seoul

Korea

Termination: February 11, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Pan Logistics PVT. LTD.

Org No.: 024936

Address: 309, 9th Floor, Marathon Max

Junction of L.B.S. Marg 

Mulund Goregoan Link Road, Muland West

Mumbai 400080

India

Termination: February 24, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond
Portlink International Services (Pvt) Ltd. dba Pollux & Castor Container Line

Org No.: 024595

Address: 301, 3rd Floor, Business Plaza

Mumtaz Hassan Road, Off I.I. Chundrigar Road

Karachi 74000

Pakistan

Termination: February 17, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

PT NNR Prima Global Logistics Indonesia

Org No.: 025790

Mutiara Building, 3rd Floor, Suite 303

JL. Mampang Prapatan Raya, No. 10

Jakarta 12790

Indonesia

Termination: February 20, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

R.R. Joshi (Shipping & Forwarding) PVT. LTD.

Org No.: 020920

Address: M-26, Basement Main Market

Greater Kailash, Part II

New Delhi 110048

India

Termination: February 4, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49424-49425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23151]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ASTM International Standards

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 13, 2017, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ASTM International 
(``ASTM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions 
or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of 
current, ongoing ASTM standards activities originating between May 2017 
and September 2017 designated as Work Items. A complete listing of ASTM 
Work Items along with a brief description of each, is available at 
http://www.astm.org.
    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the

[[Page 49425]]

Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 10, 
2004 (69 FR 65226).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 15, 
2017. A notice was filed in the Federal Register on June 28, 2017 (82 
FR 29328).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-23151 Filed 10-24-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Carl Savoy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/csavoy\/","title":"Commission Meeting Scheduled for July 28, 2021","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wt1LXOwgfY\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-july-28-2021\/\">Commission Meeting Scheduled for July 28, 2021<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-july-28-2021\/embed\/#?secret=wt1LXOwgfY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Scheduled for July 28, 2021” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"wt1LXOwgfY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencySharesSMJapanese Yen Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joe Arruda, Chief Financial Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: January 14, 2010



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/S/ JOE ARRUDA               
|Joe Arruda*                  
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Joe Arruda is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------