alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OrgNo Organization Name Reason for Action License No.

Termination 

Date Comment

020280 ARIEL CARGO EXPORT INC. Failure to maintain a bond 020280N 10/1/2020

015079 ATLANTIC CARGO, INC. Voluntary Surrender 4426F 10/2/2020

022905 DOMEK LOGISTICS, L.L.C. Failure to maintain bonds 022905NF 10/2/2020

025501 EL PALMAR INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS, LLC Failure to maintain a bond 025501F 10/24/2020

021115 ENVIOS CATRACHOS, INC. Failure to maintain a bond 021115N 10/23/2020

020928 GALLAGHER INTERNATIONAL, LLC Voluntary Surrender 020928N 10/8/2020

026807 HEIZWERTHY CUSTOMS & FREIGHT SOLUTIONS LLC Voluntary Surrender 026807N 10/14/2020

020566 INTERCONTINENTAL FORWARDING USA, CORP. Failure to maintain bonds 020566NF 9/27/2020

020903 IPPCO GLOBAL SERVICES, INC. Voluntary Surrender 020903NF 10/7/2020

024750 MOL CONSOLIDATION SERVICE (AMERICA) INC. Voluntary Surrender 024750N 10/21/2020 Forwarder remains active

17081 SPEEDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. Voluntary Surrender 017081N 9/28/2020

002587 STEVENS FORWARDERS, INC. Failure to maintain a QI 4421NF 10/6/2020

023484 WIDELANE GLOBAL LOGISTICS LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 023484N 9/28/2020

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations & Surrenders

September 23 to October 24,  2020
#### Edward PERUTA; Michelle Laxson; James Dodd; Leslie Buncher, Dr.; Mark Cleary; California Rifle and Pistol Association Foundation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, State of California, Intervenor-Pending, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; William D. Gore, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-56971.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 26, 2015.

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this *1107-1119case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion and order denying motions to intervene shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Doyle\u2019 Remarks to Widener University School of Law Alumni Association, Washington, DC","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"uj3XztxNET\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-doyle-remarks-to-widener-university-school-of-law-alumni-association-washington-dc\/\">Commissioner Doyle\u2019 Remarks to Widener University School of Law Alumni Association, Washington, DC<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-doyle-remarks-to-widener-university-school-of-law-alumni-association-washington-dc\/embed\/#?secret=uj3XztxNET\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Doyle\u2019 Remarks to Widener University School of Law Alumni Association, Washington, DC” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"uj3XztxNET\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Carl Savoy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/csavoy\/","title":"Commission Meeting Scheduled for January 27, 2022","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vGmUTK6WHC\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-january-27-2022\/\">Commission Meeting Scheduled for January 27, 2022<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-january-27-2022\/embed\/#?secret=vGmUTK6WHC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Scheduled for January 27, 2022” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"vGmUTK6WHC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Dye’s Prepared Remarks to National Maritime Interagency Advisory Group Meeting","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"e7ZxvIkgRM\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-dyes-prepared-remarks-to-national-maritime-interagency-advisory-group-meeting\/\">Commissioner Dye’s Prepared Remarks to National Maritime Interagency Advisory Group Meeting<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-dyes-prepared-remarks-to-national-maritime-interagency-advisory-group-meeting\/embed\/#?secret=e7ZxvIkgRM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Dye’s Prepared Remarks to National Maritime Interagency Advisory Group Meeting” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"e7ZxvIkgRM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Esdaid Amaro CASTHILAIN-TORRES, also known as Esaid Amaro Casthi-lain-Amaro, also known as Jason Omar Torres, also known as Omar Torres, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-11079

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 2008.

Paulina M. Jacobo, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Sherylynn Ann Kime-Goodwin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*355Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Esdaid Amaro Casthilain-Torres presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by *United States v. Brown,*920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir.1991), *abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Candia,*454 F.Bd 468, 472-73 (5th Cir. 2006), which held that a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed state sentence. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21

- 0258 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DAVID LAWRENCE PITTSLEY, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 12, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 8 2021

12/08/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0258
#### Yusuf Ali ALI; et al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General; et al., Respondents-Appellants.

No. 07-35422.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 5, 2008.

Filed May 9, 2008.

Thomas L. Boeder, Esq., Nicholas P. Gellert, Esq., Rolf B. Johnson, Esq., Perkins Coie, LLP, Seattle, WA, Christine Stebbins Dahl, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioners-Appellees.

*742Christopher Lee Pickrell, Esq., USSE— Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, Greg D. Mack, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondents-Appellants.

Before: ALARCÓN, GRABER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

In this matter, the district court assessed a sanction of $1,000 because Respondents filed a brief that exceeded the page limits set forth in Local Rule 7(e)(4). Respondents contend that the district court abused its discretion and violated due process in imposing a monetary sanction without providing them with notice and an opportunity to be heard with regard to the appropriateness of the sanction. We agree.

In the absence of extraordinary circumstances, the imposition of a monetary sanction for a violation of a local rule without notice and an opportunity to be heard is a violation of the Due Process Clause. *Miranda v. S. Pac. Transp. Co.,*710 F.2d 516, 519-23 (9th Cir.1983). No extraordinary circumstances excused the notice and hearing requirements here, so we must reverse and remand. *Id.*At a hearing on remand, the district court can determine whether the sanctioned party’s conduct amounted to “recklessness, gross negligence, repeated — although unintentional'— flouting of court rules, or willful misconduct before approving the imposition of monetary sanctions under local rules.” *Zambrano v. City of Tustin,*885 F.2d 1473, 1480 (9th Cir.1989) (footnotes omitted).

We VACATE the order imposing sanctions and REMAND with instruction that the district court conduct a hearing to determine whether it should rescind the sanction or reimpose it, while articulating its reasons.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32




         CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of Transition Auto Finance III
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kenneth C. Lowe, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: August 12, 2003                  /s/ KENNETH C. LOWE
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Kenneth C. Lowe
                                    Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence HICKS, a/k/a Bunky, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7387.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 31, 2011.

Decided: April 5, 2011.

Clarence Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Hicks seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hicks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
*Order Entered July 20, 2010:*

#### People v Bryant,

Docket No. 280073.

The Court orders that the June 22, 2010, opinion is hereby vacated, and a new opinion is attached. *

The June 22, 2010, opinion indicated that the prosecution did not file a brief on appeal. In fact, the prosecution did file a brief on appeal, which this Court received the first day of the case call to which this case was assigned. The new opinion merely omits references to the fact that the prosecution did not file a brief on appeal.

*

 Reported at 289 Mich App 260—Reporter.
/753-Z3

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 14-12-01099-CR OFFENSE: Credit Card Abuse

STYLE: Dustin Zacharv Cole v The State of Texas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed as Reformed TRIAL COURT: 351st District Court

DATE: 11/14/2013 Publish:No TC CASE #: 1321571

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Dustin Zacharv Cole v The State of Texas CCA tt. nsi'/s

Stai-dS Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: ^F>r!) /£ Q.&M

JUDGE: f^C?

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:.

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2705 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2705

   To amend the Natural Gas Act to provide for expanded natural gas 
                                exports.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2021

  Mr. Pfluger (for himself and Mr. Cuellar) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Natural Gas Act to provide for expanded natural gas 
                                exports.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Natural Gas Export Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. NATURAL GAS EXPORTS.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that expanding natural gas exports 
will lead to increased investment and development of domestic supplies 
of natural gas that will contribute to job growth and economic 
development.
    (b) Natural Gas Exports.--Section 3(c) of the Natural Gas Act (15 
U.S.C. 717b(c)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or any other nation not excluded by this 
        section'' after ``trade in natural gas'';
            (2) by striking ``(c) For purposes'' and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(c) Expedited Application and Approval Process.--
            ``(1) In general.--For purposes''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Exclusions.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Any nation subject to sanctions 
                or trade restrictions imposed by the United States is 
                excluded from expedited approval under paragraph (1).
                    ``(B) Designation by president or congress.--The 
                President or Congress may designate nations that may be 
                excluded from expedited approval under paragraph (1) 
                for reasons of national security.
            ``(3) Order not required.--No order is required under 
        subsection (a) to authorize the export or import of any natural 
        gas to or from Canada or Mexico.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10189]

Based upon a review of the administrative record assembled in this matter, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I have concluded that there is a sufficient factual basis to find that Abdallah Azzam Brigades (and other aliases) is also known as Marwan Hadid Brigades, also known as Marwan Hadid Brigade.

                    Therefore, pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, I hereby amend the designation of Abdallah Azzam Brigades as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist to include the following                           ( print page 50928)                        new aliases: Marwan Hadid Brigades, also known as Marwan Hadid Brigade.                

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: September 27, 2017.

Rex W. Tillerson,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2017-23788 Filed 11-1-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 22, 2022

NO. 03-22-00263-CR

Johnny Ray Pierce, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.