alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Chairman Cordero’s TOC Remarks","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"eoaGCyUCyL\"><a href=\"\/chairman-corderos-toc-remarks\/\">Chairman Cordero’s TOC Remarks<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/chairman-corderos-toc-remarks\/embed\/#?secret=eoaGCyUCyL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Chairman Cordero’s TOC Remarks” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"eoaGCyUCyL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Hector Enrique Josue Monroy PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73974.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*696Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 6, 2008.

Hector Enrique Josué Monroy Perez, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Christopher T. Dong, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hector Enrique Josué Monroy Perez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *see Ochoa v. Gonzales,*406 F.3d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that the untimely filing of Monroy Perez’s asylum application should be excused due to changed or extraordinary circumstances. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(D); *see also 8*C.F.R. § 208.4(a)(4)-(5). Accordingly, we deny the petition as to his asylum claim.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of withholding of removal because Monroy Perez failed to demonstrate that he was persecuted in the past, or that he will be persecuted in the future, on account of a protected ground. *See Molino-Mor-ales v. INS,*237 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2001); *see also Arteaga v. Mukasey,*511 F.3d 940, 945-46 (9th Cir.2007); *Ochoa,*406 F.3d at 1171-72.

Substantial evidence also supports the denial of CAT relief because Monroy Perez did not show it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if he returns to Guatemala. *See Bellout v. Ashcroft,*363 F.3d 975, 979 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 210 (Wednesday, November 1, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 50661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4338-DR: Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Georgia; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4338-DR), dated September 15, 2017, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 18, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of September 15, 2017.

    Bibb, Chattahoochee, Clarke, Clinch, Decatur, Dodge, Dooly, 
Glascock, Grady, Gwinnett, Heard, Henry, Jefferson, Lanier, Lee, 
McDuffie, Mitchell, Pulaski, Stewart, Sumter, Terrell, Thomas, 
Towns, Twiggs, Union, Upson, Webster, White, and Wilkinson Counties 
for Public Assistance [Categories C-G] (already designated for 
debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and 
B], including direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance 
program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-23799 Filed 10-31-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 51831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24283]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Termination of the Receivership of 10335, The First 
State Bank, Camargo, Oklahoma

    The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as 
Receiver for 10335, The First State Bank, Camargo, Oklahoma, has been 
authorized to take all actions necessary to terminate the receivership 
estate of The First State Bank (Receivership Estate); the Receiver has 
made all dividend distributions required by law. The Receiver has 
further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-Corporate as its 
attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all documents that may be 
required to be executed by the Receiver which FDIC-Corporate, in its 
sole discretion, deems necessary; including but not limited to 
releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, assignments and 
deeds. Effective November 1, 2017, the Receivership Estate has been 
terminated, the Receiver discharged, and the Receivership Estate has 
ceased to exist as a legal entity.

    Dated: November 3, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-24283 Filed 11-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
#### James Alvin ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SHERIFF’S JAIL AVOYELLES PARISH, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-30894

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 20, 2008.

*439James Alvin Atkins, Dequincy, LA, pro se.

Before STEWART, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

James Alvin Atkins, Louisiana prisoner # 416076, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

Atkins argues on appeal that prison officials acted with deliberate indifference to his health or safety when they failed to repair leaks that caused water puddles, which in turn caused Atkins to slip and fall. However, Atkins has not shown that the officials disregarded any inference that there was a substantial risk of serious harm, and his claims amount only to claims of unreasonableness or negligence, neither of which establishes an Eighth Amendment violation. *See Cantu v. Jones,*293 F.3d 839, 844 (5th Cir.2002); *Hare v. City of Corinth,*74 F.3d 633, 649 (5th Cir.1996) (en banc); *Neals v. Norwood,*59 F.3d 530, 533 (5th Cir.1995).

Atkins also argues that Steven Dozat was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs when he delayed sending Atkins to a doctor concerning his May 19, 2006, injury until July 21, 2006. However, Atkins has not shown that the delay in treatment substantially harmed him or exacerbated his injury in any way, and he has not shown that Dozat’s administration of Motrin and Tylenol alone during the delay were attributable to anything more than negligence, which does not establish a constitutional violation. *See Mendoza v. Lynaugh,*989 F.2d 191, 195 (5th Cir.1993).

The district court’s dismissal of Atkins’s complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). *See Adepegba v. Hammons,*103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir.1996). Atkins is warned that if he accumulates three strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed *440while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*§ 1915(g).

AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen A. Hozie, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Home
      Mortgage Holdings, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
      and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5.    The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.


         /s/ Stephen A. Hozie
----------------------------------------
Stephen A. Hozie
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ociel Enrique SALINAS-CAMPOS, also known as Ociel E. Salinas, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-41641

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 15, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ociel Salinas-Campos appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for unlawful reentry following removal from the United States. Salinas asserts that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence pursuant to Sentencing Guideline § 2L1.2(b)(l)(B), based on the determination that Salmas’ prior Texas conviction for possession with intent to deliver cocaine is a “drug-trafficking offense” under that Guideline. Salinas contends Texas law defines a “delivery” to include an “offer to sell,” which is conduct that is not punishable under the Controlled Substances Act. Tex. Health *&*Safety Code Ann. §§ 481.002(8), 481.112(a).

Although post *-Booker,*the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory only, and an ultimate sentence is reviewed for reasonableness under an abuse-of-discretion standard, the district court must still properly calculate the guideline-sentencing range for use in deciding on the sentence to impose. *Gall v. United States,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 596, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). In that respect, its application of the guidelines is reviewed *de novo;*its factual findings, only for clear error. *E.g., United States v. Villegas,*404 F.3d 355, 359 (5th Cir.2005).

*387Salinas’ indictment and judgment for his prior conviction, which were included in the district court record, establish he pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him with knowing and actual possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Because Salinas admitted to conduct which expressly constitutes a drug-trafficking offense under § 2L1.2, the district court did not err in enhancing his sentence. *See United States v. Ford,*509 F.3d 714, 717-18 (5th Cir.2007).

In the light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Salmas challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. This argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Home > Engagements > Commissioner Vekich Addressing Transportation Go!

## Commissioner Vekich Addressing Transportation Go!

Posted on:

March 14, 2024
OCCUPANCY
AGREEMENT

This
AGREEMENT (the Agreement),
effective as of January 1, 2009 (the
Effective Date), between Newtown Lane Marketing, Incorporated
(the Corporation), a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Delaware and Kirk M. Warshaw, LLC (the LLC), a limited liability company
organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey.

WHEREAS,
the Corporations principal
offices are located at 47 School Avenue, Chatham, New Jersey and such premises
are owned by the LLC (the Principal Offices); and

WHEREAS,
the Corporation and the LLC wishes to enter into an agreement for use and
occupancy of the Principal Offices and certain administrative services;

NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, it is agreed that:

Effective
as of the Effective Date, the Corporation hereby agrees that it shall pay to
the LLC a quarterly occupancy and administrative services fee in the amount of
U.S. five hundred dollars ($500) on each of January 1, April 1, July 1 and
October 1 until such time as this Agreement is terminated by written notice of
either party.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly
executed and delivered this Agreement effective as of the Effective Date on
January 29, 2009.

| |                                                                |                       
| | -------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------
| | NEWTOWN
 LANE MARKETING, INCORPORATED,
 a Delaware corporation
| |                                                                |                       
| | By:                                                            | /s/
 Arnold P. Kling  
| |                                                                |                       
| |                                                                | Name: Arnold P. Kling 
| |                                                                | Title: President      
| |                                                                |                       
| | Kirk M. Warshaw, LLC.,
 a New Jersey limited liability company
| |                                                                |                       
| | By:                                                            | /s/ Kirk
 Warshaw     
| |                                                                |                       
| |                                                                | Name: Kirk Warshaw    
| |                                                                | Title: Managing Member

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Cat Energy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period end of October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Richard G. Stifel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 10th day of December, 2010.





/s/ Richard G. StifelRichard G. StifelChief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Meeting Scheduled for June 24, 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BjOml72yVw\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-june-24-2015\/\">Commission Meeting Scheduled for June 24, 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-june-24-2015\/embed\/#?secret=BjOml72yVw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Scheduled for June 24, 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"BjOml72yVw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}