alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3522 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3522

   To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide grants and 
assistance to States to conduct outreach to veterans regarding hardship 
     and priority under the Department of Veterans Affairs patient 
                           enrollment system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2009

 Mr. Space (for himself and Mr. Ryan of Ohio) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide grants and 
assistance to States to conduct outreach to veterans regarding hardship 
     and priority under the Department of Veterans Affairs patient 
                           enrollment system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Hardship Outreach for 
Priority Eights (HOPE) Act''.

SEC. 2. OUTREACH TO VETERANS REGARDING HARDSHIP AND PRIORITY UNDER 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PATIENT ENROLLMENT SYSTEM.

    (a) Assistance Provided.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
provide grants and other assistance to States for the purpose of 
providing outreach to veterans who may be able to apply for a change in 
priority under the patient enrollment system maintained by the 
Secretary under section 1705 of title 38, United States Code, due to 
hardship.
    (b) Priority for Certain States.--In providing grants and 
assistance under subsection (a), the Secretary shall give priority to 
States with--
            (1) veteran populations of at least 500,000; and
            (2) unemployment rates that exceed the national average 
        unemployment rate.
    (c) Limitation.--For any fiscal year, not more than 20 percent of 
the amount of the funds made available for the provision of grants and 
assistance under subsection (a) shall be provided to any one State.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this Act such sums as may be necessary for 
each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > About > Bureaus and Offices > Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services > Moving Small Shipments in Boxes or Barrels Overseas

Moving Small Shipments in Boxes or Barrels Overseas To avoid problems when shipping small packages overseas:



Ensure that the company you choose is FMC licensed and bonded.



Check with CADRS or the local Better Business Bureau to make sure that the company does not have a history of unresolved complaints.



Label new clothing, commercial merchandise, and similar products to avoid customs seizure.



Avoid using companies that advise you to misrepresent the value or nature of your goods.Ensure that the company you choose provides you with the following in writing: an itemized list of goods shipped (including the value of the goods); terms and conditions of service; and information on insurance (if any); and any additional costs or fees that might be incurred.



Ask the company you choose to provide you an estimate of when your goods will be delivered. Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                             540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,478
<PP&E>                                       2,266,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                 412,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,953,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,628,953
<BONDS>                                      1,766,958
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        289
<COMMON>                                    17,908,163
<OTHER-SE>                                 (21,351,233)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,953,130
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                (6,337)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,138,153
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,243,630)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,243,630)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,243,630)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
haguetransitionagreement






Aspen Technology, Inc. [phone] 781-221-5400 [world wide web] www.aspentech.com   20 Crosby Drive [fax] 781-221-5213 [e-mail] info@aspentech.com   Bedford, MA 01730 USA  aspentech    April 21, 2022  Mr. John Hague  Dear John:  This letter confirms our agreement on your new role at AspenTech as Executive Vice  President of Aspen Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), reporting to the Chief Executive  Officer (with primary responsibilities to be assigned by the Chief Executive Officer)  effective as of April 21, 2022 and continuing through October 1, 2022 (the "Retirement  Date"). This letter agreement sets forth our agreement with respect to your continued  employment from and after the date hereof through the Retirement Date (the "Transition  Period"). Reference is hereby made to the Amended and Restated Executive Retention  Agreement dated as of January, 2019 between you and the Company (as amended  hereby, the "ERA"). Capitalized terms used but not defined in this letter agreement and  defined in the ERA shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the ERA.  Except as otherwise provided herein, the terms of the ERA and your rights and obligations  thereunder shall remain and continue in effect.  Your employment with the Company will terminate automatically on the Retirement Date  and you shall be deemed to have resigned from all positions with the Company at such  time. The Retirement Date will be your last day of employment with the Company for all  purposes, including for purposes of participation in and coverage under benefit plans  and programs sponsored by the Company and its affiliates, except as otherwise provided  herein. Following the Retirement Date (or, if earlier, a termination of your employment),  you may not represent yourself as being an employee, officer, agent or other  representative of the Company or any of its affiliates.  During the Transition Period, you will remain an active employee of the Company and  will hold the position and perform the duties assigned to you by the Chief Executive  Officer (as described above). While you are employed by the Company during the  Transition Period, you will continue to be entitled to the following:  (a) continued base salary and annual target bonus opportunity at the level  currently in effect;  (b) continued participation in Company benefits, as may be in effect or  amended from time to time; and  1  Error! Unknown document property name.
Slip Op. 02-96 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

________________________________________ : KOYO SEIKO CO., LTD. and : KOYO CORPORATION OF U.S.A.; : NSK LTD. and NSK CORPORATION; : NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, : AMERICAN NTN BEARING MANUFACTURING : CORPORATION and NTN CORPORATION; : THE TIMKEN COMPANY, : Consolidated : Court No. Plaintiffs and : 98-06-02274 Defendant-Intervenors, : : v. : : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant. :

________________________________________ JUDGMENT This Court, having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce ”), Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remandon Koyo Seiko Co. v. United States , 26 CIT ___, 186 F. Supp. 2d1332 (2002) (“ Remand Results ”), comments to preliminary version of the Remand Results by Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. and NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation, holds that Commerce duly complied with the Court’s remand order, and it is hereby
ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on July 1, 2002, are affirmed in their entirety; and it is furtherConsol. Court No. 98-06-02274 Page 2

ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this case is dismissed.

______________________________ NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS SENIOR JUDGE
Dated: August 22, 2002

New York, New York
EXHIBIT 32.1

DIGIMARC CORPORATION    CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Digimarc Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Bruce Davis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:
August 1, 2008

By:

/s/BRUCE DAVISBruce Davis Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
October 6 , 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RODNEY UNDERWOOD , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00422

- CV V.

BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICI NG, LLC , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on January 23, 2015. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Rodney Underwood.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of LianDi Clean Technology Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yong
Zhao, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Yong
      ZhaoYong
      ZhaoChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)




June 25,
2010
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Newtown Lane Marketing, Incorporated (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 26, 2009

|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Kirk M. Warshaw           
|                              
|Kirk M. Warshaw               
|Chief Financial Officer       
|(Principal Financial
 Officer)

A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard M. Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of Newtown Lane Marketing,
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2007 (the
"Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: June 1, 2007

                                                     /s/ Richard M. Cohen
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Richard M. Cohen
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7109

RONALD MILES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-00-204)

Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 20, 2003

Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Miles, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Miles seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.

R. Civ. P. 60(b) of the denial of his petition filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken to this court from

the final order arising out of a habeas corpus proceeding unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not

issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent

“a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). As to claims dismissed by a district

court solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability

will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1)

‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the

petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional

right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable

whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’”

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941

(2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons

stated by the district court that Miles has not satisfied either

standard. See Miles v. Angelone, No. CA-00-204 (E.D. Va. July 9,

2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We deny Miles’ motion for discovery, motion
3

for appointment of counsel, motion requesting that a single judge

act on his motions, and motion for judicial notice and review of

documents in the record. We deny Miles’ motion for oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Findex.com, Inc. (the “company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Kirk R.
      Rowland, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted),
      that
      to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the company at the end of the periods covered by the Periodic Report.





In
      Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of
      this 22nd day of
      August, 2005.








By
            /s/
                Kirk R. RowlandKirk
                R. Rowland, CPAChief
                Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1
          - [REG-134247-16]
          - RIN 1545-BN73

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects a correction to a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-134247-16) that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Friday, September 15, 2017. The notice of proposed rulemaking, published on January 6, 2017, under section 1441 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Code), relates to withholding of tax on certain U.S. source income paid to foreign persons and requirements for certain claims for refund or credit of income tax made by foreign persons.                    

# DATES:

The correction published on September 15, 2017 (82 FR 43314), is corrected as of October 26, 2017 and is applicable beginning January 6, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kamela Nelan at (202) 317- 6942 (not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

The notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-134247-16) that is the subject of this correction is under section 1441 of the Code.

## Need for Correction

As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-134247-16) contains an error which may prove to be misleading and needs to be corrected.

## Correction of Publication

Accordingly, the notice of proposed rulemaking published at 82 FR 43314, September 15, 2017, is corrected as follows:

                    On page 43314, in the third column, under the heading “Correction of Publication”, in the fourth line, the                           ( print page 49550)                        language “On page 1636, ” is corrected to read “On page 1646, ”.                

Martin V. Franks,

Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).

[FR Doc. 2017-22815 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P