Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 208 / Monday, October 30, 2017 / Notices 50131 

Additionally, the FTC complaint 

alleges that the respondent, in certain of 

its articles, emails, and social media 

posts, misrepresented that its 

endorsements were independent and 

not paid advertising, and failed to 

adequately disclose that the content 

recommended schools that paid the 

respondent specifically to be promoted 

therein. The proposed complaint alleges 

that those misrepresentations and 

undisclosed paid recommendations 

constitute deceptive acts or practices 

under Section 5 of the FTC Act. 

The proposed order is designed to 

prevent the respondent from engaging in 

similar deceptive practices in the future. 

Part I prohibits the respondent from 

making any misrepresentations 

regarding the scope of any search tool, 

including whether the tool only 

searches ‘‘military friendly’’ schools. 

Part I further prohibits the respondent 

from making any misrepresentations 

about material connections between it 

and any schools, and from making any 

misrepresentations that paid 

commercial advertising is independent 

content. 

Part II requires the respondent, when 

endorsing schools (or preparing thirdparty endorsements of schools), to 

clearly and conspicuously disclose, in 

close proximity to the endorsement, any 

payments or other material connections 

between the respondent or the other 

endorser and the school. This disclosure 

requirement applies where consumers 

are likely to believe that such 

endorsements reflect the beliefs of the 

respondent or other endorser (and not 

the schools themselves). 

Parts III through VII of the proposed 

order are reporting and compliance 

provisions. 

Part III is an order distribution 

provision. Part IV requires the 

respondent to submit a compliance 

report one year after the issuance of the 

order, and to notify the Commission of 

corporate changes that may affect 

compliance obligations. Part V requires 

the respondent to create, for 10 years, 

accounting, personnel, complaint, and 

advertising records, and to maintain 

each of those records for 5 years. Part VI 

requires the respondent to submit 

additional compliance reports within 10 

business days of a written request by the 

Commission, and to permit voluntary 

interviews with persons affiliated with 

the respondent. Part VII ‘‘sunsets’’ the 

order after twenty years, with certain 

exceptions. 

The purpose of this analysis is to aid 

public comment on the proposed order. 

It is not intended to constitute an 

official interpretation of the complaint 

or proposed order, or to modify in any 

way the proposed order’s terms. 

By direction of the Commission. 

Donald S. Clark, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2017–23514 Filed 10–27–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6750–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention 

[60Day–18–0932; Docket No. CDC–2018– 

0094] 

Proposed Data Collection Submitted 

for Public Comment and 

Recommendations 

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC), Department of Health 

and Human Services (HHS). 

ACTION: Notice with comment period. 

SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of 

its continuing effort to reduce public 

burden and maximize the utility of 

government information, invites the 

general public and other Federal 

agencies the opportunity to comment on 

a proposed and/or continuing 

information collection, as required by 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

This notice invites comment on a 

proposed information collection project 

titled Information Collection for 

Evaluation of Education, 

Communication, and Training Activities 

for Mobile Populations. This data 

collection will enable to evaluate its 

mobile populations and stakeholders 

communication, training, and education 

material’s effectiveness. 

DATES: CDC must receive written 

comments on or before December 29, 

2017. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by Docket No. CDC–2018– 

0094 by any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

Regulations.gov. Follow the instructions 

for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Leroy A. Richardson, 

Information Collection Review Office, 

Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS– 

D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

Docket Number. CDC will post, without 

change, all relevant comments to 

Regulations.gov. 

Please note: Submit all Federal 

comments through the Federal 

eRulemaking portal (regulations.gov) or 

by U.S. mail to the address listed above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

request more information on the 

proposed project or to obtain a copy of 

the information collection plan and 

instruments, contact Leroy A. 

Richardson, Information Collection 

Review Office, Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton 

Road NE., MS–D74, Atlanta, Georgia 

30329; phone: 404–639–7570; Email: 

omb@cdc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) 

(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal agencies 

must obtain approval from the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for each 

collection of information they conduct 

or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also 

requires Federal agencies to provide a 

60-day notice in the Federal Register 

concerning each proposed collection of 

information, including each new 

proposed collection, each proposed 

extension of existing collection of 

information, and each reinstatement of 

previously approved information 

collection before submitting the 

collection to the OMB for approval. To 

comply with this requirement, we are 

publishing this notice of a proposed 

data collection as described below. 

The OMB is particularly interested in 

comments that will help: 

1. Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

2. Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

3. Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

4. Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submissions 

of responses. 

5. Assess information collection costs. 

Proposed Project 

Information Collection for Evaluation 

of Education, Communication, and 

Training Activities for Mobile 

Populations (OMB Control Number 

0920–0932, Expires 7/31/2018)— 

Extension—National Center for 

Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
50132 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 208 / Monday, October 30, 2017 / Notices 

Diseases (NCEZID), Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention (CDC). 

Background and Brief Description 

The CDC’s Division of Global 

Migration and Quarantine (DGMQ) 

seeks to request a three-year extension 

of a currently approved generic 

information collection plan to conduct 

evaluation research. Information 

gathered from this plan’s associated data 

collections will help CDC plan and 

implement health communication, 

education, and training activities to 

improve health and prevent the spread 

of disease. These activities include 

communicating, educating, and training 

with international travelers and other 

mobile populations, training healthcare 

providers, and educating public health 

departments, federal partners, and other 

stakeholders. 

CDC proposes to change the current 

title of this generic plan from 

‘‘Information Collection for Evaluation 

of Education, Communication, and 

Training Activities for the Division of 

Global Migration and Quarantine’’ to 

‘‘Information Collection for Evaluation 

of Education, Communication, and 

Training Activities for Mobile 

Populations.’’ 

In the past three years, OMB approved 

two individual information collections 

under this generic plan, where both 

resulted in collaborations between 

multiple divisions within the NCEZID. 

DGMQ proposes a less exclusive project 

title because multiple divisions across 

NCEZID frequently collaborate on 

various activities. DGMQ does not 

propose any other changes for this 

extension request. 

DGMQ has aligned the proposed 

information collections with DGMQ’s 

mission to reduce morbidity and 

mortality among immigrants, refugees, 

travelers, expatriates, and other globally 

mobile populations, and to prevent the 

introduction, transmission, or spread of 

communicable diseases from foreign 

countries into the United States. This 

mission is supported by delegated legal 

authorities outlined in the Public Health 

Service (PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 264) and 

in regulations that are codified in 42 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 

70 and 71, and 34. 

Approval of this extension request 

will enable DGMQ to continue 

collecting information in an expedited 

manner. To help improve and inform 

activities during both routine and 

emergency public health events, DGMQ 

seeks to collect the following 

information types: Knowledge, 

attitudes, and behaviors of key 

audiences (such as refugees, 

immigrants, migrants, international 

travelers, travel industry partners, 

healthcare providers, non-profit 

agencies, customs brokers and 

forwarders, schools, state and local 

health departments). This generic 

information collection plan will help 

DGMQ continue to refine efforts prove 

valuable for communication activities 

that must occur quickly in response to 

public health emergencies. 

DGMQ staff will use a variety of data 

collection methods for this proposed 

project: Interviews, focus groups, 

surveys, and pre/post-tests. Depending 

on the research questions and audiences 

involved, data may be gathered inperson, by telephone, online, or using 

some combination of these formats. CDC 

may collect data in quantitative and/or 

qualitative forms. CDC will assess 

numerous audience variables under the 

auspices of this generic information 

collection plan. These include, but are 

not limited to, knowledge, attitudes, 

beliefs, behavioral intentions, practices, 

behaviors, skills, self-efficacy, and 

information needs and sources. Insights 

gained from evaluation research will 

assist in the development, refinement, 

implementation, and demonstration of 

outcomes and impact of 

communication, education, and training 

activities. 

DGMQ estimates that 17,500 

respondents and 7,982 hours of burden 

will be involved in evaluation research 

activities each year. The collected 

information will not impose a cost 

burden on the respondents beyond that 

associated with their time to provide the 

required data. 

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS

Type of respondents Form name Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Average 

burden per 

response 

(in hours) 

Total burden 

(in hours) 

General Public .................................. Focus Groups Screening form ......... 1,050 1 10/60 175 

Healthcare Professionals .................. Focus Groups Screening form ......... 450 1 10/60 75 

General Public .................................. Focus Groups ................................... 525 1 90/60 788 

Healthcare Professionals .................. Focus Groups ................................... 225 1 90/60 338 

General Public .................................. Interview Screening Form ................ 700 1 10/60 117 

Healthcare Professionals .................. Interview Screening Form ................ 300 1 10/60 50 

General Public .................................. Interviews ......................................... 350 1 1 350 

Healthcare Professionals Interviews Interviews ......................................... 150 1 1 150 

General Public .................................. Survey Screening Forms ................. 5,250 1 10/60 875 

Healthcare Professionals .................. Survey Screening Forms ................. 2,250 1 10/60 375 

General Public .................................. Surveys ............................................ 2,625 1 45/60 1,969 

Healthcare Professionals .................. Surveys ............................................ 1,125 1 45/60 844 

General Public .................................. Pre/Post Tests .................................. 1,750 1 45/60 1,313 

Healthcare Professionals .................. Pre/Post Tests .................................. 750 1 45/60 563 

Total ........................................... ........................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 7,982 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 208 / Monday, October 30, 2017 / Notices 50133 

Leroy A. Richardson, 

Chief, Information Collection Review Office, 

Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the 

Associate Director for Science, Office of the 

Director, Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 2017–23561 Filed 10–27–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Administration for Children and 

Families 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

Proposed Projects 

Title: Multistate Financial Institution 

Data Match and Federally Assisted State 

Transmitted Levy (MSFIDM/FAST 

Levy). 

OMB No.: 0970–0196. 

Description: Section 466(a)(17) of the 

Social Security Act (the Act) requires 

states to establish procedures for their 

child support agencies to enter into 

agreements with financial institutions 

doing business in their state for the 

purpose of securing information leading 

to the enforcement of child support 

orders. Under 452(m) and 

466(a)(17)(A)(i) of the Act, the Secretary 

may aid state agencies conducting data 

matches with financial institutions 

doing business in two or more states by 

establishing a centralized and 

standardized matching program through 

the Federal Parent Locator Service. 

To further assist states collect child 

support, the federal Office of Child 

Support Enforcement (OCSE) worked 

with child support agencies and 

financial institutions to develop the 

Federally Assisted State Transmitted 

(FAST) Levy system. 

FAST Levy is a central, standardized, 

and secure electronic process for child 

support agencies and financial 

institutions to exchange information 

about levying financial accounts to 

collect past-due support. OCSE picks up 

files created by child support agencies 

that contain FAST Levy requests and 

distributes them to financial institutions 

that use the FAST Levy system. Those 

financial institutions create response 

files that OCSE picks up and distributes 

to the child support agencies. 

The MSFIDM/FAST-Levy information 

collection activities are authorized by: 

42 U.S.C. 652(m), which authorizes 

OCSE, through the Federal Parent 

Locator Service, to aid state child 

support agencies and financial 

institutions doing business in two or 

more states reach agreements regarding 

the receipt from financial institutions, 

and the transfer to the state child 

support agencies, of information 

pertaining to the location of accounts 

held by obligors who owe past-due 

support; 42 U.S.C. 666(a)(2) and 

(c)(1)(G)(ii), which require state child 

support agencies in cases in which there 

is an arrearage to establish procedures to 

secure assets to satisfy any current 

support obligation and the arrearage by 

attaching and seizing assets of the 

obligor held in financial institutions; 42 

U.S.C. 666(a)(17)(A), which requires 

state child support agencies to establish 

procedures under which the state child 

support agencies shall enter into 

agreements with financial institutions 

doing business in the State to develop 

and operate, in coordination with 

financial institutions, and the Federal 

Parent Locator Service (in the case of 

financial institutions doing business in 

two or more States), a data match 

system, using automated data exchanges 

to the maximum extent feasible, in 

which a financial institution is required 

to quarterly provide information 

pertaining to a noncustodial parent 

owing past-due support who maintains 

an account at the institution and, in 

response to a notice of lien or levy, 

encumber or surrender, assets held; 42 

U.S.C. 652(a)(7), which requires OCSE 

to provide technical assistance to state 

child support enforcement agencies to 

help them establish effective systems for 

collecting child and spousal support; 

and, 45 CFR 303.7(a)(5), which requires 

state child support agencies to transmit 

requests for information and provide 

requested information electronically to 

the greatest extent possible. To facilitate 

this requirement for states, OCSE 

developed the FAST Levy system that 

supports the electronic exchange of lien 

and levy information between child 

support agencies and financial 

institutions. 

Respondents: Multistate Financial 

Institutions and State Child Support 

Agencies. 

ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES

Instrument Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Average 

burden hours 

per response 

Total burden 

hours 

Financial Data Match Result File-Portal .......................................................... 192 4 5 minutes 1 64 

Election Form ................................................................................................... 30 1 0.5 15 

FAST-Levy Record Specifications: Current Financial Institutions Users to 

Program New Codes .................................................................................... 1 1 65 2 65 

FAST-Levy Record Specifications: Current State Child Support Agencies to 

Program New Codes .................................................................................... 3 1 65 195 

FAST-Levy Response Withhold Record Specifications: Financial Institutions 1 1 1,716 1,716 

FAST-Levy Request Withhold Record Specifications: State Child Support 

Agencies ....................................................................................................... 2 1 1,610 3,220 

1Estimate is approximately 5 minutes per response. For calculation, use 5/60. 

2Estimate is an average based on input from OCSE’s matching partners. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 5,275. 

Additional Information: Copies of the 

proposed collection may be obtained by 

writing to the Administration for 

Children and Families, Office of 

Planning, Research and Evaluation, 330 

C Street SW., Washington, DC 20201, 

Attention Reports Clearance Officer. All 

requests should be identified by the 

information collection. Email address: 

infocollection@acf.hhs.gov 

OMB Comment: OMB is required to 

make a decision concerning the 

collection of information between 30 

and 60 days after publication of this 

document in the Federal Register. 

Therefore, a comment is best assured of 

having its full effect if OMB receives it 

within 30 days of publication. Written 

comments and recommendations for the 

proposed information collection should 

be sent directly to the following: Office 

of Management and Budget, Paperwork 

Reduction Project, Email: OIRA_

SUBMISSION@OMB.EOP.GOV, Attn: 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES