alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 50720 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Miguel Angel Berdeja**

**- Medina,**  Defendant

— Appellant **,**

**consolidated with**

**_____________ No. 20** 

**- 50726** 

**_____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Angel Verdeja**

**- Medina,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.** United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 19, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50720 Document: 00515750675 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2021No. 20

- 50720 c/w No. 50726

2 Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 666

- 1 USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 36

- 1

Before **Clement, Higginson,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** * Miguel Angel Berdeja

- Medina appeals his sentence of 78 months in prison, which the district court imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He also appeals from the judgment revoking his supervised r elease, which had been imposed after a prior illegal reentry conviction. Berdeja

- Medina contends that the recidivism enhancement under § 1326(b)(1), which was applied in his case, is unconstitutional because it allows a sentence above the otherwise applic able statutory maximum of two years of imprisonment, see § 1326(a), based on facts that are neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He concedes the issue is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S . 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for further review. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance, asserting that Berdeja

- Medina ’s argument is foreclosed. The parties are correct that Berdeja

- Medina’s assertion is fo reclosed by Almendarez

- Torres

. See United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. Case: 20-50720 Document: 00515750675 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/19/2021No. 20

- 50720 c/w No. 50726

3 Cir. 2014); United States v. Rojas

- Luna , 522 F.3d 502, 505

- 06 (5th Cir. 2008). Further, Berdeja

- Medina has abandoned any challenge to the revocation of his supervised rel ease by failing to brief an argument as to the revocation. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224

- 25 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is **GRANTED** , see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), t he Government’s motion for an extension of time to file a brief is **DENIED** , and the judgments of the district court are **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 20-50720 Document: 00515750675 Page: 3 Date Filed: 02/19/2021
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 11148 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LUIS MANUEL ALCAZAR ROJAS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:13

- CR

- 25

- 1

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Manuel Alcazar Rojas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Alcazar Rojas h a s not file d a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5. 4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 11, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-11148 Document: 00512695326 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2014No. 13

- 11148
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. The record, however, reflects a clerical error in the written judgment. Alcazar Rojas was indicted for and pleaded guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 2252(a)(2). However, the written judgment lists the statutes of conviction as “18 U.S. C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2.” Accordingly, we REMAND for correction of the clerical error in the written judgment in accord ance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. See United States v. Higgins , 739 F.3d 733, 739 n.16 (5th Cir.), cert. denied (May 19, 2014) (No. 13

- 9678); United States v. Rosales , 448 F. App’x 466, 466

- 67 (5th Cir. 2011)

.

2 Case: 13-11148 Document: 00512695326 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/11/2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-480 and 731-TA-1188 (Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders on high pressure steel cylinders from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted these reviews on May 1, 2017 (82 FR 20314) and determined on August 4, 2017 that it would conduct expedited reviews (82 FR 42836, September 12, 2017).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on October 31, 2017. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4738 (October 2017), entitled                     *High Pressure Steel Cylinders from China: Investigation Nos.*                     701-TA-480 and 731-TA-1188 (Review).                

      ( print page 51291)    
By order of the Commission.

Issued: October 30, 2017.

Lisa R. Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2017-23929 Filed 11-2-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > Engagements > Commissioner Sola Speaking at SeaTrade Cruise Global

Commissioner Sola Speaking at SeaTrade Cruise Global


Posted on:


April 9, 2024 April 9, 2024 | Miami Beach, FL



Commissioner Louis Sola will discuss shore power issues as part of a panel being held at the SeaTrade Cruise Global conference taking place April 8-11, 2024. Information about the event and how to register to attend can be found on the event’s website. Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
**Exhibit      32.1**

|                                   |                                   |                                                  |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                   |
|                              |                              |                                             |
| Dated:                November 8, 2006 | By:                          | /s/                 *Li                Xia WANG* |
|                                   | Li                Xia WANG             |
|                                   | Chief                Executive Officer |

|                                   |                                   |                                                |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                   |
|                              |                              |                                           |
| Dated:                November 8, 2006 | By:                          | /s/                 *Peter                MAK* |
|                                   | Peter                MAK               |
|                                   | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Carl Savoy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/csavoy\/","title":"Commissioner Sola Provides Briefing on Fact Finding 30 to Senior DoT Official","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rmOseTdmXE\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-sola-provides-briefing-on-fact-finding-30-to-senior-dot-official\/\">Commissioner Sola Provides Briefing on Fact Finding 30 to Senior DoT Official<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-sola-provides-briefing-on-fact-finding-30-to-senior-dot-official\/embed\/#?secret=rmOseTdmXE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Sola Provides Briefing on Fact Finding 30 to Senior DoT Official” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"rmOseTdmXE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jean Michael SANTIAGUE, a.k.a. Emmanuel Reid, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-13985

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 16, 2008.

Gwendolyn L. Spivey, Federal Defender Office, Tallahassee, FL, Robert A. Dennis, Jr., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

E. Bryan Wilson, Tallahassee, FL, Len-nard B. Register, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Jean Michael Santiague, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion *964to withdraw is GRANTED and Santiague’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 207 (Friday, October 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23545]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: November 6, 2017, 1:30 p.m.-5:00 p.m.

PLACE: Offices of Baker/McKenzie LLP, 815 Connecticut Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20006.

STATUS: Meeting of the Board of Directors with the Advisory Council, 
Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

[ssquf] Approval of the Minutes of the meetings held in April, May, and 
September 2017
[ssquf] Advisory Council Membership Update
[ssquf] Management Report
[ssquf] IAF Mexico Earthquake Response
[ssquf] New Business
[ssquf] Adjournment

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Paul Zimmerman, General Counsel, 
(202) 683-7118.

Paul Zimmerman,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2017-23545 Filed 10-25-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7025-01-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Chairman Cordero Meets with Cotton Club Members","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mrRR68bflj\"><a href=\"\/chairman-cordero-meets-with-cotton-club-members\/\">Chairman Cordero Meets with Cotton Club Members<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/chairman-cordero-meets-with-cotton-club-members\/embed\/#?secret=mrRR68bflj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Chairman Cordero Meets with Cotton Club Members” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"mrRR68bflj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2686 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

90 Palm Boulevard North in Niceville, Florida, as the ‘‘Doolittle Raiders 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2021 

Mr. GAETZ (for himself, Ms. SALAZAR, Mrs. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. C. 

SCOTT FRANKLIN of Florida, Mr. POSEY, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. LAWSON of Florida, Mr. MAST, and Mr. RUTHERFORD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 90 Palm Boulevard North in Niceville, Florida, 

as the ‘‘Doolittle Raiders Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DOLITTLE RAIDERS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 90 Palm Boulevard North in 

6 Niceville, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Doolittle Raiders Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2686 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Doolittle Raiders Post 

5 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Voiceserve, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the for the year ended March 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Aron Sandler, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
                The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and


(2)
              The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented.


Dated: 
July 14, 2008




By: /s/ Aron Sandler


Aron
Sandler


Chief
Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40020 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RONALD GARY KIRK, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-38-1

- - - - - - - - - - September 23, 1998 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *Appellant, Ronald Gary Kirk, Jr., appeals his conditionalguilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana and possession of an altered telecommunications device. Kirk challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of the stop and search of the rental car he was driving. Kirk did not have standing to contest the search of the vehicle because he was not an authorized driver of the vehicleNo. 98-40020 -2- and knew that the rental contract prohibited unauthorized drivers from operating it. See United States v. Boruff , 909 F.2d 111, 117 (5th Cir. 1990). AFFIRMED.