alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2744 

To provide hazardous duty pay for Federal employees who may be exposed 

to COVID–19, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2021 

Mr. PAYNE (for himself, Mr. BROWN, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. SUOZZI, Ms. 

NORTON, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. NEWMAN, and Mr. CARSON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To provide hazardous duty pay for Federal employees who 

may be exposed to COVID–19, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hazardous Duty Pay 

5 for Frontline Federal Workers Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2744 IH

1 SEC. 2. PAY DIFFERENTIAL FOR DUTY RELATED TO COVID– 

2 19. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5545 of title 5, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(e)(1) The Office shall establish a schedule or sched7 ules of pay differentials for duty during which an employee 

8 is exposed to an individual who has (or who has been ex9 posed to) COVID–19. 

10 ‘‘(2) Under such regulations as the Office may pre11 scribe, during the period beginning on March 15, 2020, 

12 and ending on September 30, 2020, an employee to whom 

13 chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 applies, and 

14 an employee appointed under chapter 73 or 74 of title 38, 

15 is entitled to be paid the differential under paragraph (1) 

16 for any period in which the employee is carrying out the 

17 duty described in such paragraph.’’. 

18 (b) TSA EMPLOYEES.—Section 111(d)(2) of the 

19 Aviation and Transportation Security Act (49 U.S.C. 

20 44935 note) is amended by adding at the end the fol21 lowing: 

22 ‘‘(C) HAZARDOUS DUTY PAY FOR COVID– 

23 19.—The provisions of section 5545(e) of title 

24 5, United States Code, shall to apply to any in25 dividual appointed under paragraph (1).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nicki Christodoulou, Appellant.

[665 NYS2d 586]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Beldock, J.), rendered February 14, 1995, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s contention that the court improperly marshalled the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Barren,*240 AD2d 586). In any event, the trial court marshalled the evidence in a fair and even-handed manner and its failure to explain all of the contentions of both parties did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial *(see, People v Barren, supra; People v Dickman,*223 AD2d 524; *People v McNeil,*228 AD2d 620).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit *(see, e.g., People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Santucci and Luciano, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") by
National Coal Corp.  ("Registrant"),  each of the undersigned  hereby  certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of our  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of our knowledge,  the information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.





                                             /s/ Jon Nix
Date:  November 18, 2004                   _________________________
                                             Jon Nix
                                             President and
                                             Chief Executive Officer





                                             /s/ Robert Chmiel
Date:  November 18, 2004                   __________________________
                                             Robert Chmiel
                                             Chief Financial Officer
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3537 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 14, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To amend and reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp 

Conservation and Design Program Act of 1994. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3537 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Junior Duck Stamp 

3 Conservation and Design Program Reauthorization Act of 

4 2009’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

6 Congress finds the following: 

7 (1) In 2007–2008, sales of the $5 Junior Duck 

8 Stamp generated more than $100,000 in revenue, all 

9 of which was used to provide educational materials 

10 for the program, fund scholarships for students, and 

11 support and promote the program’s goal of con12 necting children with nature. 

13 (2) Now in its 20th year, the Junior Duck 

14 Stamp Conservation and Design Program is one of 

15 this country’s oldest and most successful govern16 ment-sponsored, youth-focused conservation biology 

17 programs. The program continues to build strong 

18 partnerships with public and parochial schools, 

19 homeschoolers and after-school programs, and other 

20 youth-focused education programs throughout the 

21 country. 

22 (3) The Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and 

23 Design Program continues to foster strong partner24 ships among Federal and State government agen25 cies, nongovernment organizations, the business 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3537 RFS

1 community, and others in the private sector to pro2 mote youth conservation initiatives. 

3 (4) With its conservation-focused science and 

4 arts curriculum, the Junior Duck Stamp Conserva5 tion and Design Program has helped prepare hun6 dreds of thousands of students to become stewards 

7 of America’s irreplaceable wild places and treasured 

8 outdoor heritage. 

9 SEC. 3. REPORTING REQUIREMENT. 

10 Section 2(c)(2) of the Junior Duck Stamp Conserva11 tion and Design Program Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 

12 719(c)(2)) is amended to read as follows: 

13 ‘‘(2) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Beginning in 

14 2010 and every 5 years thereafter, the Secretary 

15 shall submit to Congress a report on the status of 

16 the Program in each State.’’. 

17 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

18 Section 6 of the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation 

19 and Design Program Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 719c) is 

20 amended to read as follows: 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 3537 RFS

1 ‘‘SEC. 6. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 ‘‘There is authorized to be appropriated to the Sec3 retary for administrative expenses of the Program 

4 $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2015.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 13, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gilbert KITILA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 10-1370.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 3, 2010.

*866Gilbert Kitila, Appellant Pro Se. Carol Barthel, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gilbert Kitila appeals the district court’s order granting the government’s motion to reduce to judgment tax assessments made against Kitila for unpaid federal income taxes and penalties for the 1988, 1989, and 1990 tax years. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Kitila,*No. 8:09-cv-00455-DKC, 2010 WL 917873 (D.Md. Mar. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Michael A. Khouri Joins the Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ERYgcMZFco\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-michael-a-khouri-joins-the-commission\/\">Commissioner Michael A. Khouri Joins the Commission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-michael-a-khouri-joins-the-commission\/embed\/#?secret=ERYgcMZFco\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Michael A. Khouri Joins the Commission” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ERYgcMZFco\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 21.1
  BURGER
    KING HOLDINGS, INC.
    List of Subsidiaries
  Entity Name

JurisdictionAdministracion de Comidas Rapidas, S.A. de C.V.

MexicoB.K. Services, Ltd.

DelawareBK Acquisition, Inc.

DelawareBK Argentina Servicios, S.A.

ArgentinaBK Asiapac (Japan) Y.K.

JapanBK Asiapac, Pte. Ltd.

SingaporeBK Card Company, LLC

FloridaBK CDE, Inc.

DelawareBK Grundstucksverwaltungs Beteiligungs GmbH

GermanyBK Grundstucksverwaltungs GmbH & Co. KG

GermanyBK Venezuela Servicios, C.A.

VenezuelaBurger King (Gibraltar) Ltd.

GibraltarBurger King (Hong Kong) Limited

Hong KongBurger King (Luxembourg) S.a r.l.

LuxembourgBurger King (Shanghai) Commercial Consulting Co. Ltd.

Hong KongBurger King (Shanghai) Restaurant Company Ltd.

Hong KongBurger King (United Kingdom) Ltd.

United KingdomBurger King A.B.

SwedenBurger King B.V.

NetherlandsBurger King Beteiligungs GmbH

GermanyBurger King Restaurant Operations of Canada, Inc.

CanadaBurger King Corporation

FloridaBurger King de Puerto Rico, Inc.

Puerto RicoBurger King do Brasil Assessoria a Restaurantes Ltda.

BrazilBurger King Espana S.L.U.

SpainBurger King Europe GmbH

SwitzerlandBurger King Gida Sanayi Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi

TurkeyBurger King GmbH Berlin

GermanyBurger King GmbH Munchen

GermanyBurger King Interamerica, LLC

FloridaBurger King Israel Ltd.

IsraelBurger King Italia, S.r.L.

ItalyBurger King Korea Ltd.

KoreaBurger King Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.

MexicoBurger King Restaurants B.V.

NetherlandsBurger King Restaurants K.B.

SwedenBurger King Restaurants of Canada Inc.

CanadaBurger King (RUS) LLC

RussiaBurger King Schweiz GmbH

SwitzerlandBurger King Singapore Pte. Ltd.

SingaporeBurger King Sweden, Inc.

Florida




---



##### 



Entity Name

JurisdictionBurger King UK Pension Plan Trustee Company Limited

United KingdomBurger Station B.V.

NetherlandsBurger King Limited

United KingdomCitoyen Holding B.V.

NetherlandsDistron Transportation Systems, Inc.

FloridaEmpire Catering Company Limited

United KingdomEmpire International Restaurants Limited

United KingdomF.P.M.I. Food Services, Inc.

CanadaGolden Egg Franchises Limited

United KingdomHayescrest Limited

United KingdomHuckleberrys Limited

United KingdomJ C Baker & Herbert Bale Limited

United KingdomMid-America
    Aviation, Inc.

OregonMini Meals Limited

United KingdomMontrap Limited

United KingdomMontrass Limited

United KingdomMoxies, Inc.

LouisianaQZ, Inc.

FloridaThe Melodie Corporation

New MexicoTPC Number Four, Inc.

DelawareTPC Number Six, Inc.

TexasTQW Company

Texas  2
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 50867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23883]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2307-078]

Alaska Electric Light & Power Company: Notice of Availability of 
Environmental Assessment

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 380, the Office of Energy Projects has 
reviewed the application for a new license for the Salmon Creek and 
Annex Creek Hydroelectric Project, located on Salmon Creek and Annex 
Creek in the City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska and has prepared an 
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the project. The project occupies 
648.45 acres of federal lands administered by the United States 
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
    The EA contains staff's analysis of the potential environmental 
effects of the project and concludes that relicensing the project, with 
appropriate environmental protective measures, would not constitute a 
major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the 
human environment.
    A copy of the EA is available for review at the Commission in the 
Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at 
http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number 
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access 
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at 
[email protected], (866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY).
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances 
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC 
Online Support.
    Any comments should be filed within 30 days from the date of this 
notice.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file 
comments using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 
6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system 
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your 
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For 
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support. In lieu of electronic 
filing, please send a paper copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. The 
first page of any filing should include docket number P-2307-078.
    For further information, contact Suzanne Novak at (202) 502-6665.

    Dated: October 24, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-23883 Filed 11-1-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Exhibit 8.1



Subsidiaries of Registrant



|Name of undertaking                    |  | Country ofregistration |  | Activity                            |  | %holding |    
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | -------- | ---
|GW Pharma Limited                      |  | England and Wales      |  | Research and Development            |  |          | 100
|GW Research Limited                    |  | England and Wales      |  | Research and Development            |  |          | 100
|GW Pharmaceuticals Inc.                |  | United States          |  | Pharmaceutical development services |  |          | 100
|GWP Trustee Company Limited            |  | England and Wales      |  | Employee Share Ownership            |  |          | 100
|Cannabinoid Research Institute Limited |  | England and Wales      |  | Dormant                             |  |          | 100
|Guernsey Pharmaceuticals Limited       |  | Guernsey               |  | Dormant                             |  |          | 100
|G-Pharm Limited                        |  | England and Wales      |  | Dormant                             |  |          | 100
|
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Votes to Initiate Service Contract Filing Regulatory Reform","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"55VAA7O2RU\"><a href=\"\/commission-votes-to-initiate-service-contract-filing-regulatory-reform\/\">Commission Votes to Initiate Service Contract Filing Regulatory Reform<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-votes-to-initiate-service-contract-filing-regulatory-reform\/embed\/#?secret=55VAA7O2RU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Votes to Initiate Service Contract Filing Regulatory Reform” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"55VAA7O2RU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Gregory Terrell, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered July 15, 2015, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered July 15, 2015, affirmed.</p><p>Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (<i>see Anders v California</i>, 386 US 738 [1967]; <i>People v Saunders</i>, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders</i>, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: May 08, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          34,832
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  423,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                    55,620
<INVENTORY>                                     37,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               479,403
<PP&E>                                       2,764,754
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,050,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,715,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          380,994
<BONDS>                                      1,465,353
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                     384,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,715,824
<SALES>                                      1,005,144
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,005,144
<CGS>                                          359,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,025,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (68,915)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (27,598)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (41,317)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 60,500
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (101,817)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>