alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-018
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Fact Finding 30 Interim Report Issued Examining Impacts to CA, HI, and U.S. Pacific Territories","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4I6QmFNeD2\"><a href=\"\/fact-finding-30-interim-report-issued-examining-impacts-to-ca-hi-and-u-s-pacific-territories\/\">Fact Finding 30 Interim Report Issued Examining Impacts to CA, HI, and U.S. Pacific Territories<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fact-finding-30-interim-report-issued-examining-impacts-to-ca-hi-and-u-s-pacific-territories\/embed\/#?secret=4I6QmFNeD2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Fact Finding 30 Interim Report Issued Examining Impacts to CA, HI, and U.S. Pacific Territories” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"4I6QmFNeD2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
OrgNo OrgName Reason for action License No. Termination Date Comments

027740 AMERICAN SHIPPING SERVICES, LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 027740N 9/3/2023

027367 A.M. SHIPPING INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 027367NF 9/13/2023

030395 ARCH GLOBAL LOGISTICS USA LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 030395NF 9/14/2023

024124 AZ FREIGHT INTERNATIONAL INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 024124NF 9/24/2023

023940 CONVERGENT LOGISTICS LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN  BONDS 023940NF 9/1/2023

010868 DAVID GRANNIS FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 003498F 9/22/2023

021247 DEMARK CUSTOMS BROKER, INC. VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 021247NF 9/14/2023

020840 E‐CARGO INTERNATIONAL GROUP CORP. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 020840N 9/7/2023

029771 GAT LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 029771NF 9/9/2023

030026 INXEPTION CORPORATION FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 030026F 9/27/2023

031842 ISELECT LOGISTICS SERVICE INC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 031842F 9/1/2023 NVOCC 031842N REMAINS ACTIVE

020947 NEUTRAL SEA, LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 020947NF 9/11/2023

027920 OCEAN FREIGHT PROS INC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 027920NF 9/23/2023

028493 OH MY FREIGHT LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 028493NF 9/14/2023

025773 PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS, INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 025773F 9/19/2023 NVOCC 025773F REMAINS ACTIVE

026762 POLARIZ GROUP INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 026762N 9/8/2023 OFF 026762F REMAINS ACTIVE

026481 POLONEZ PARCEL SERVICE, LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 016444N 9/22/2023

024040 PREMIERE LOGISTICS, INC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 024040N 9/10/2023 OFF 024040F REMAINS ACTIVE

025555 SIGNATURE TRADING SERVICES, INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 025555F 9/7/2023

018639 TAMARIND CONSOLIDATED & ASSOCIATES, INC. VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 018639N 9/20/2023

027037 THE SAIRA, LLC DBA THE FREIGHT SOLUTIONS VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 027037F 9/25/2023 NVOCC 027037N REMAINS ACTIVE

015746 VANTAGE INT'L SHIPPING INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 015746N 9/28/2023

027128 WORLD WIDE INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS INC. VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 027128NF 9/14/2023

021229 ZIAD H. HAJAHMED FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 021229F 9/11/2023 NVOCC 021229N REMAINS ACTIVE

027314 ZIEGLER LOGISTIC & CO, CORP FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 027314NF 9/13/2023

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations & Surrenders

September 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
 800 North Capitol Street, N.W.
 

Washington, DC 20573 

Inspector General 

TO: Chairman Cordero 

Commissioner Lidinsky 

Commissioner Doyle 

Commissioner Dye 

Commissioner Khouri 

FROM: Jon Hatfield 

Interim Inspector General 

DATE: April 11, 2014 

SUBJECT: Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010 

In accordance with Section 3(b) of Public Law 111-204, Improper Payments Elimination and 

Recovery Act of 2010 (hereafter referred to as IPERA), this letter communicates the results of 

the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) determination 

of the FMC’s compliance with applicable provisions of the IPERA. 

The purpose of IPERA is to improve the federal government’s efforts to reduce and recover 

improper payments. Improper payments are payments that should not have been made or that 

were made in an incorrect amount (including overpayments or underpayments); and includes 

any payment to an ineligible recipient, any payment for an ineligible good or service not 

received, and any payment that does not account for credit for applicable discounts. 

Each agency inspector general is required to review improper payment reporting in their 

agency’s annual Performance and Accountability Report (PAR) to determine if the agency is 

in compliance with IPERA. This letter covers the FMC’s fiscal year (FY) 2013 activities. 

The results of this OIG review are due within 120 days of the PAR issuance date. Due to the 

2013 government shutdown, the FMC PAR was issued on December 16, 2013. The OIG is 

required to report these results to the FMC Commission; the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; the Committee on Oversight and 

Governmental Reform of the House of Representatives; the Comptroller General; and the 

Controller of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 

OMB issued government-wide guidance on the implementation of IPERA in April 2011. 

This guidance is OMB Circular A-123, Management’s Responsibility for Internal Controls, 

Appendix C, Parts I and II, April 2011. Based on this OMB guidance, if any agency estimates
 

less than $10 million in annual improper payments, the extent of the inspector general review 
is limited. FMC management reported in the FY 2013 PAR a zero dollar improper payment 

estimate. Consequently, the OIG’s IPERA compliance review was limited to a verification 

the FMC reported this estimate of the annual amount of improper payments for all programs 

and activities in the PAR. 

The agency published the FY 2013 PAR on the agency website and concluded it has not 

identified any program that constitutes a high-risk for improper payments and considers all of 

its payments to be low-risk. The agency is not required to publish improper payment 

corrective action plans or reduction targets. 

In summary, the OIG has determined the FMC is compliant with the IPERA and applicable 

guidance. 

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me on (202)523-5258 or 

jhatfield@fmc.gov. 

Cc: Vern W. Hill, Managing Director 

2
#### Connell SPAIN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2008-5027.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 7, 2008.

*989Connell Spain, Sr., of Fort Worth, Texas, pro se.

Dawn E. Goodman, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for defendant-appel-lee. With her on the brief were Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Deborah A. Bynum, Assistant Director.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Connell Spain, Sr., seeks review of the United States Court of Federal Claims’ December 20, 2007 order that sua sponte dismissed his complaint for lack of jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the court’s order is *affirmed.*

In his complaint, Mr. Spain alleges that the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied him due process rights in violation the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as denied him equal protection in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, by dismissing his claims in *In re Connell Spain, Sr.,*Case No. 07-mc-00013 (N.D.Tex.2007). The Court of Federal Claims concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Mr. Spain’s claims because neither the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments nor the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment are money-mandating.

This court reviews de novo the Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of Mr. Spain’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction. *See Samish Indian Nation v. United States,*419 F.3d 1355, 1363 (Fed.Cir.2005). In conducting its review, this court assumes that the facts pled by Mr. Spain are true. *See id-,*at 1364.

The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction. In simple terms, the Court of Federal Claims can only hear limited types of cases. These types of eases are claims for money damages against the United States under an express or implied contract, or under a money-mandating constitutional provision, statute, or regulation. *Fisher v. United States,*402 F.3d 1167, 1172 (Fed.Cir.2005) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1). Therefore, the ability of the Court of Federal Claims to hear Mr. Spain’s case depends on whether the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments or the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment are money-mandating. Unfortunately for Mr. Spain, it is well-settled that these constitutional provisions are not money-mandating. *See LeBlanc v. United States,*50 F.3d 1025, 1028 (Fed.Ch-.1995). Accordingly, the Court of Federal Claims is not authorized to hear the claims pled by Mr. Spain, even if they were true.1

*990CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the decision of the Court of Federal Claims.

COSTS

No costs.

1

. Mr. Spain argues that Court of Federal Claims Rule. 12(h)(3), regarding dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, is unconstitutional. This argument is meritless.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

January 26, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-10556 Summary Calendar

RICKY A. GRAHAM,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas

(2:01-CV-51)

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, AND STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Ricky A. Graham appeals the district

court’s judgment affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s

decision to deny disability benefits. He argues that the

determination by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) that he did not

meet or equal the criteria of any impairments listed in Appendix 1,

20 C.F.R. Part 404 was not supported by substantial evidence.

Graham contends that he met the requirements for establishing the

affective disorder of depression under 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. P,2

App. 1, § 12.04. We have reviewed the re cord and the parties’

briefs and conclude that ALJ’s determination that Graham’s

depression did not meet or equal the criteria of any impairments

listed in Appendix 1, 20 C.F.R. Part 404 is supported by

substantial evidence. See Anthony v. Sullivan , 954 F.2d 289, 292

(5th Cir. 1992); Villa v. Sullivan

, 895 F.2d 1019, 1021-22 (5th

Cir. 1990). The ALJ was not required to give precedence to

subjective evidence over objective evid e nce which showed that

Graham’s depression was not disabling. Anthony , 954 F.2d at 295-

96. Further, no d octor testified that Graham was disabled as a

result of his alleged depression. V aughan v. Shalala

, 58 F.3d 129,

131 (5th Cir. 1995).

Moreover, Graham’s testimony regarding his daily activities

was inconsistent with his claimed limitations. R eyes v. Sullivan

,

915 F.2d 151, 154-155 (5th Cir. 1990). Finally, medical records

showed th at Graham was prescribed Wellbutrin and that he was

responding well to the medication. S ee Johnson v. Bowen

, 864 F.2d

340, 348 (5th Cir. 1988). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1
  
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
 
 (1)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-166075) pertaining to the PGT, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan,
 
 (2)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-146719) pertaining to the PGT Savings Plan, and
 
 (3)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-135616) pertaining to the PGT, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the PGT, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan;
 
 of our reports dated March 21, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of PGT, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of PGT, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 1, 2011.
 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
 Certified Public Accountants
 Tampa, Florida
 March 21, 2011
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventiv Health, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eran Broshy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 /s/    ERANBROSHYEran Broshy
Chief Executive Officer 
 August 9, 2004
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ventiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by Ventiv Health, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencySharesSMSwedish Krona Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Kevin Farragher, Chief Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: January 14, 2009       
|                             
|/s/ KEVIN FARRAGHER          
|Kevin Farragher*             
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Kevin Farragher is signing in his
capacity as the principal executive officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Section 1350Certification by Principal Executive Officer

 

The following statement isbeing made to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purposes of Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), which carries with itcertain criminal penalties in the event of a knowing or willfulmisrepresentation.

 

The undersigned herebycertifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the registrant.

 

 
| Dated: August 13,  2008 | By:    | /s/  ZACHARY R.  SUCHIN                                      |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Name:   Zachary  R. Suchin                              |
|                         |   | Title:      Principal  Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by suchAct, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Suchcertification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.

 

1

----