alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 3433 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To amend the North American Wetlands Conservation Act to establish requirements 

regarding payment of the non-Federal share of the costs of wetlands conservation 

projects in Canada that are funded under that Act, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARE OF PROJECTS IN 

MEXICO AND CANADA UNDER NORTH AMERICAN WETLANDS CONSERVATION ACT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8(b)(3) of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 4407(b)(3)) is amended to read 

as follows: 

‘‘(3) The non-Federal share of the United States contribution 

to the costs of such projects may not be derived from Federal 

grant programs. In the case of a project carried out in Canada 

or Mexico, the non-Federal share of the costs of the project may 

include cash contributions from non-United States sources that 

are used to pay costs of the project. In the case of a project 

carried out in Canada, funds from Canadian sources may comprise 

up to 50 percent of the non-Federal share of the costs of the 

project.’’. 

(b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 

apply with respect to any approved and active wetlands conservation project (as that term is used in section 8(b)(1) of such Act) 

carried out with assistance provided under such Act, including 

such a project approved before the date of the enactment of this 

Act. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-0944V

UNPUBLISHED

LEANNE ROTH,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: October 28, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Bridget Candace McCullough, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for 

respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On June 28, 2019, Leanne Roth filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on 

October 20, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of 

the Office of Special Masters.

On October 23, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, Respondent “believes that [P]etitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

SIRVA, as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table”. Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that 

Petitioner suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months. Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
Slip Op. 02-96

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

________________________________________

:

KOYO SEIKO CO., LTD. and :

KOYO CORPORATION OF U.S.A.; :

NSK LTD. and NSK CORPORATION; :

NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, :

AMERICAN NTN BEARING MANUFACTURING :

CORPORATION and NTN CORPORATION; :

THE TIMKEN COMPANY, : Consolidated

: Court No.

Plaintiffs and : 98-06-02274

Defendant-Intervenors, :

:

v. :

:

UNITED STATES, :

:

Defendant. :

________________________________________

JUDGMENT

This Court, having received and reviewed the United States

Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s

(“Commerce”), Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court

Remand on Koyo Seiko Co. v. United States, 26 CIT ___, 186 F. Supp.

2d 1332 (2002) (“Remand Results”), comments to preliminary version

of the Remand Results by Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation

of U.S.A. and NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation, holds that Commerce

duly complied with the Court’s remand order, and it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on July 1,

2002, are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further
Consol. Court No. 98-06-02274 Page 2

ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this

case is dismissed.

______________________________

NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

 SENIOR JUDGE

Dated: August 22, 2002

New York, New York
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Celebrity Cruises\u2019 Celebrity Millennium","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"x3ZNyhU8ls\"><a href=\"\/celebrity-cruises-celebrity-millennium\/\">Celebrity Cruises\u2019 Celebrity Millennium<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/celebrity-cruises-celebrity-millennium\/embed\/#?secret=x3ZNyhU8ls\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Celebrity Cruises\u2019 Celebrity Millennium” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"x3ZNyhU8ls\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Section 906 Certification
                                     by the
               Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

         Each of Gary Valinoti, Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas J.
Mazzarisi, Chief Financial Officer, of JAG Media Holdings, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
October 31, 2003 ("Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ Gary Valinoti                           /s/ Thomas J. Mazzarisi
-----------------                           -----------------------
Name: Gary Valinoti                         Name: Thomas J. Mazzarisi

Date: December 19, 2003
#### Dwight A. RUDISILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. Travis BRAGG, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-7576.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

Dwight Alexander Rudisill, Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*247PER CURIAM:

Dwight Alexander Rudisill, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition and motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Rudisill v. Bragg,*No. 4:13-cv-01327-CMC, 2013 WL 5309152 (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[LETTERHEAD OF SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.]



GMAC-RFC
2255 N. Ontario Street, Ste 400
Burbank, CA  91504
Attention: Compliance Officer


        Re: Annual Compliance Statement for RALI SERIES 2006-QS3 TRUST

        In connection  with the loans serviced by SunTrust  Mortgage,  Inc. (the
"Company")  pursuant to the Company's Servicing  Agreement(s)/Purchase  and Sale
Agreement(s)  with  GMAC-RFC  and  any  applicable  Reconstitution  Agreement(s)
(together,  the "Transaction  Agreements"),  I, the undersigned officer,  hereby
certify the following as of December 31, 2006:

(i)  The Company  conducted a review of its  activities  during the  immediately
     preceding  calendar  year  (or  applicable  portion  thereof)  and  of  its
     performance  under the Transaction  Agreements  during such period has been
     made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the  best  of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Company  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations  under the  Transaction  Agreements in all
     material  respects  throughout  such calendar year (or  applicable  portion
     thereof),  except  that as of  January 1, 2006,  the  Company  did not have
     procedures for monitoring  compliance with requirements as specified in the
     applicable transaction agreements governing SEC Regulation AB transactions.
     To address the absence of such  procedures,  the Company's  management  has
     undertaken and completed the following  actions:  (a) completed a review of
     each  Transaction  Agreement and identified if there was specific  language
     affecting any of the Servicing  Criteria  outlined in Section 1122;  (b) to
     the degree that the Transaction  Agreements  required  specific  procedures
     related to the servicing  criteria,  the Company's  Reference Point Library
     (where all  policies and  procedures  are  maintained)  was updated to this
     effect;  (c)  for  each  pool,  a  Control  Matrix  was  completed  (and is
     maintained on a current basis)  identifying  which  Transaction  Agreements
     control each pool;  and (d)  established a monthly review process where the
     Company's  managers  review key factors of  performance  under  Transaction
     Agreements and respond to a questionnaire  indicating  compliance with such
     factors.



        IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I do hereby  certify the  foregoing as of the date
hereof.

        /s/ John R. Purcell, Jr.

        John R. Purcell, Jr.
        Senior Vice President - Manager, Servicing Division

        Date:  February 27, 2007
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00087-CR

IN RE Richard PADILLA

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 29, 2012

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On February 8, 2012, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the 

trial court to rule on his pro se motion for speedy trial and/or motion to dismiss. However, in 

order to be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must establish that the trial court: (1) had a legal 

duty to perform a non-discretionary act; (2) was asked to perform the act; and (3) failed or 

refused to do so. In re Molina, 94 S.W.3d 885, 886 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, orig. 

proceeding). When a properly filed motion is pending before a trial court, the act of giving 

consideration to and ruling upon that motion is ministerial, and mandamus may issue to compel 

the trial judge to act. See Safety-Kleen Corp. v. Garcia, 945 S.W.2d 268, 269 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 1997, orig. proceeding). However, mandamus will not issue unless the record indicates 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2007-CR-4263 & 2007-CR-4264, styled State of Texas v. Richard Padilla, 

in the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner presiding. 
04-12-00087-CR

- 2 -

that a properly filed motion has awaited disposition for an unreasonable amount of time. See id. 

Relator has the burden of providing this court with a record sufficient to establish his right to 

mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a) (“Relator must file with the petition [ ] a certified 

or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was 

filed in any underlying proceeding”); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A); Walker v. Packer, 

827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). 

Here, relator does not indicate when his motion was filed nor does he provide this court 

with a file stamped copy of the motion or any other documents to show that a properly filed 

motion is pending before the trial court and has been brought to the trial court’s attention. Based 

on the foregoing, we conclude relator has not shown himself entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

Additionally, relator filed an Application for Leave to File Petition for Writ of 

Mandamus. No leave is required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. TEX. R.

APP. P. 52. Therefore, relator’s motion for leave to file is DENIED as moot. 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
#### GCC ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Ironclad Services, Inc., Defendant.

No. 2010-5075.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2010.

Michael H. Payne, Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall *&*Furman, of Philadelphia, PA, *524argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Joseph A. Hackenbracht.

David M. Hibey, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Alan J. Lo Re, Assistant Director.

LOURIE, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
#### Don PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. TYSON FOODS INC.; Richard Shewmaker, Individually, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-60626

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 19, 2008.

John Martin Mooney, Jr., Law Offices of John M. Mooney Jr., Jackson, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Walter James Brand, Watkins *&*Eager, Jackson, MS, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Tyson Foods, Inc. et al., and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff-Appellant Don Parker’s state law claims. Accordingly, the District Court dismissed Parker’s federal claims with prejudice and his state law claims without prejudice. We affirm for essentially the same reasons given in the July 9, 2007, 2007 WL 2021928, Memorandum Opinion and Order of the District Court.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jonathan Minter, Appellant.

[667 NYS2d 266]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered November 1, 1996, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *{see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of OCM HoldCo, LLC (the “*Company*”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “*Repor**t*”), I, Ronald N. Beck, a Manager of the Company and performing certain services for the Company commonly performed by the principal financial officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: March 31,   2011 | By:    | */s/ Ronald N. Beck* |
|----------------------------------|--------|----------------------|
|                             |   | Ronald   N. Beck     |
|                             |   | Manager              |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





Section 906 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Each of Yahia Gawad, Chief Executive Officer, and James Essex, Chief Financial Officer, of CardioGenics Holdings Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge:




(1) The Company’s periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2011 (“Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Yahia Gawad

/s/ James EssexName: Yahia Gawad

Title:  Chief Executive Officer

Name: James Essex

Title: Chief Financial OfficerDate: September 19, 2011
# EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of CurrencySharesSM Swedish Krona Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Financial
Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.              The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.              The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: January 29, 2007

/s/ Nick Bonos Nick Bonos*Chief
Financial Officer(principal financial officer)

*The Registrant is a trust
and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex
Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Big Cat Energy
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period end of July 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,
Timothy Barritt, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated this 9th day of September,
2009.





TIMOTHY BARRITTTimothy
      BarrittPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer