alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Chapter I
          - [FRL-9970-25-OP]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Final report; notification of availability.

# SUMMARY:

                        The EPA is announcing the availability of its                         *Final Report on Review of Agency Actions that Potentially Burden the Safe, Efficient Development of Domestic Energy Resources Under Executive Order 13738.*

# DATES:

November 3, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Samantha Dravis, Office of Policy, Mail Code 1803-A, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: 202-564-4332; email address:                         *PolicyOffice@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On March 28, 2017, President Trump signed Executive Order 13783, Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth. The Executive Order establishes a national policy to promote the clean and safe development of domestic energy resources while avoiding unnecessary regulatory burdens. It directs federal agencies to “review all existing regulations, orders,                           ( print page 51161)                        guidance documents, policies, and any other similar agency actions (collectively, “agency actions”) that potentially burden the development or use of domestically produced energy resources[.]” [1]                                          The Executive Order also orders the EPA to review specific rules. As part of E.O. 13783, agencies are to develop a report detailing this review that includes recommendations for reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens. The EPA's final report is available at                     *https://www.epa.gov/​laws-regulations/​regulatory-reform.*

Dated: October 30, 2017. 

E. Scott Pruitt,

Administrator.

# Footnotes

1.                             82 FR 16093 (Mar. 28, 2017).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2017-23988 Filed 11-2-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
---

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to Augusta Resource
Corporations Stock Option Plan, amended and restated as of June 11, 2009 and
the Restricted Share Unit and Restricted Share Plan for designated participants
of Augusta Resource Corporation and its affiliates adopted June 11, 2009 of our
reports dated March 29, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Augusta Resource Corporation and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of Augusta Resource Corporation incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31,
2010.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, Canada March 29, 2011

---
#### Herawati Lizar SADIKIN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-74185.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed April 29, 2008.

David M. Haghighi, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

*563CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of The District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of The District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Marshall Tamor Golding, Esq. Fax, Richard M. Evans, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. *563R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Herawati Lizar Sadikin, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“LJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *see Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that the harm Sadikin suffered did not rise to the level of past persecution. *See id.*at 1016-18. Furthermore, substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Sadikin failed to demonstrate an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution. *See id.*at 1018.

Because Sadikin failed to demonstrate that she was eligible for asylum, it follows that she did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir .2000).

In her opening brief, Sadikin failed to raise, and therefore has waived, any challenge to the IJ’s determination that she is ineligible for CAT relief. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royster-Clark, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Francis P. Jenkins, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934; and





(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    FRANCIS P. JENKINS, JR.


---

Francis P. Jenkins, Jr.


Chief Executive Officer


August 12, 2002
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_______________

 

Nos. 09-3243 & 09-3275

_______________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

WAYNE R. BRYANT, 

Appellant (09-3243)

R. MICHAEL GALLAGHER,

Appellant (09-3275)

_______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

For the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Criminal Action Nos. 3-07-cr-00267-001/2)

District Judge: Honorable Freda L. Wolfson

_______________

Argued March 8, 2011

_______________

Before: SCIRICA, AMBRO, and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed August 25, 2011)

SECOND ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed

August 25, 2011, be amended as follows:

On page 5, line 11, replace “28 U.S.C. § 3231” with “18 U.S.C. § 3231”.
2

On page 17, last line, replace “(1st Cir. 2010)” with “(1st Cir.)”.

On page 33, line 8, replace “(7th Cir. 1998)” with “(7th Cir. 1988)”.

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro

Circuit Judge

Dated: October 4, 2011

SLC/cc: Norman Gross

Lisa A. Matthewson

Carl D. Poplar

Jeremy D. Frey

Ralph A. Jacobs
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencyShares® Mexican Peso Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Arruda, Chief Financial Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Trust.

Date: January 14, 2011



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ JOSEPH ARRUDA            
|Joseph Arruda*               
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Joseph Arruda is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the
Registrant.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Bonnie POEHL, Appellant, v. Carl RANDOLPH, Officer; City of Vinita Park, Appellees, Vinita Park Police Department, Defendant.

No. 06-3382.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 1, 2008.

Filed: May 6, 2008.

Bonnie Poehl, St. Louis, MO, pro se.

Michelle Victoria Stallings, Mark Zoole, Mark H. Zoole, P.C., Priscilla F. Gunn, Rabbitt & Pitzer, St. Louis, MO, for Appellees.

Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Bonnie Poehl appeals following the district court’s1 order granting partial summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, and the court’s later order dismissing the remaining counts following a jury trial on her claims arising from sexual misconduct. We find no basis for reversal and Poehl has provided none. First, having chosen an advocate to speak on her behalf, she was bound by her counsel’s decision to dismiss voluntarily the claims against the City of Vinita Park Police Department. *See Glover v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.,*150 F.3d 908, 909-10 (8th Cir.1998). Second, as to the grant of summary judgment on her claims against the City of Vinita Park, she challenges only the district court’s conclusion — which is legally correct — that she could not hold the City liable on her state claims under a respondeat superior theory. *See Meyers v. Starke,*420 F.3d 738, 742-43 (8th Cir. 2005) (to be reviewable issue must be presented in brief with some specificity, and failure to do so can result in waiver); *Gibson v. Brewer,*952 S.W.2d 239, 245-46 (Mo.1997) (en banc) (under doctrine of respondeat superior, principal is liable for agent’s acts that are within scope of employment and done as means or for purpose of doing work assigned by principal; intentional sexual misconduct was not *541within scope of priest’s employment). Finally, her challenges to various evidentiary rulings, claims of unobjected-to instructional error, and the timing of the jury trial, to the extent these challenges are sufficiently developed in the brief to warrant appellate review, are all meritless. *See Moran v. Clarke,*296 F.3d 638, 649 (8th Cir.2002) (en banc) (to warrant review of evidentiary ruling, issue must be presented on appeal in meaningfully developed manner); *Cross v. Cleaver,*142 F.3d 1059, 1067-68 (8th Cir.1998) (claimed instructional error must be shown to be prejudicial, and if party fails to object to instruction before jury retires, review is only for plain error); *Penn v. Iowa State Bd. of Regents,*999 F.2d 305, 307 (8th Cir.1993) (district courts have duty and power to manage their dockets and this court will not intervene absent abuse of discretion).

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Poehl’s motions to supplement the record, and we decline to revisit the issue of appointment of counsel for appeal.

1

. The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ensurapet, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K (Form 10-K) for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, W. Russell Smith, III, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ W. RUSSELL SMITH, III                           
|W. Russell Smith, III                               
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|April 24, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010, as amended, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Arruda, Chief Financial Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Trust.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: March 10, 2011         
|                             
|/s/ Joseph Arruda            
|Joseph Arruda*               
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Joseph Arruda is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the
Registrant.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 4.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 3


 


TO


 


SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN


 


Amendment No. 3, dated as of April 22, 2022 (this
 “Amendment No. 3”), to the Servotronics, Inc. Shareholder Rights Plan, dated as of October 15, 2012, as amended by Amendment
No. 1 dated as of March 9, 2015, and Amendment No. 2 dated as of December 22, 2021 (as amended, the “Rights Plan”).


 


RECITALS


 


1.            
The Board of Directors of the Company has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to amend the Rights Plan as set forth
in this Amendment No. 3.


 


2.            
Pursuant to Section 24 of the Rights Plan, the Company may amend the Rights Plan as the Company may deem necessary or desirable without
the approval of any holders of certificates representing shares of Common Stock of the Company.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the background,
agreements and covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


1.            
Amendment of Rights Plan.


 


(a)       
Subclause (i) of the first sentence of Section 7(a) of the Rights Plan is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:


 


“(i) the Close of Business on April 26, 2022 (the “Expiration
Date”),”


 


(b)       
The exhibits to the Rights Plan shall be deemed to be restated to reflect this Amendment No. 3, including all necessary conforming changes.


 


2.            
Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment No. 3, capitalized terms used in this Amendment No. 3 have the respective
meanings given to them in the Rights Plan.


 


3.            
No Other Modification. Other than as set forth in this Amendment No. 3, the terms and conditions of the Rights Plan remain in full
force and effect without modification thereto.


 


[Intentionally left blank]


 









    


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 3 has been
duly executed by the Company as of the date first above written.


 


	 	SERVOTRONICS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ James C. Takacs
	 	Name:	James C. Takacs
	 	Title:	Chief Operating Officer



 


ATTEST:


 


 


	/s/ Bernadine E. Kucinski	 
	Name:	Bernadine E. Kucinski	 
	Title:	Corporate Secretary
Order entered July 15, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00066-CR

JAMES BENNETT RUCKER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR10-1011

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s June 24, 2013 motion to withdraw appellant’s motion to 

abate the appeal and motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief. Appellant’s June19, 

2013 motion to abate the appeal is withdrawn. M. Michael Mowla is substituted for Patrick K. 

Short as appellant’s lead counsel of record. We DIRECT the Clerk to send all correspondence 

to M. Michael Mowla, 603 N. Cedar Ridge, Suite 100, Duncanville, Texas 75116; telephone: 

(972) 282-2600; facsimile: (972) 692-6636.

The time to file appellant’s brief is EXTENDED to THIRTY DAYS from the date of 

this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 31.1 — RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)** CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERI, Cristina M. Lambert, certify that:1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telecomunicaciones de PuertoRico, Inc. (the “registrant”); 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: August 14, 2006
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual report of OCM HoldCo, LLC (the “*Company*”) onForm 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “*Report*”), I,Stephen A. Kaplan, a Manager of the Company and performing certain services forthe Company commonly performed by the principal executive officer, do herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
| Date: March 29, 2007 | By:    | /s/* Stephen A. Kaplan* | * * |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------|----------|
|                      |   | * *                     | * * |
|                      |   | Stephen A. Kaplan   Manager  |     |

 

----
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual report of OCM HoldCo, LLC (the “*Company*”)on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “*Report*”), I, Stephen A. Kaplan, a Manager of the Company andperforming certain services for the Company commonly performed by the principalexecutive officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

(2) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: March 31,  2008 | By:    | /s/* Stephen A. Kaplan* |
|---------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                            |   | Stephen A. Kaplan            |
|                            |   | Manager                      |

 

----