alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Chairman Lidinsky Testifies to Congress Regarding FY 2011 FMC Budget","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3qgbKjFmut\"><a href=\"\/chairman-lidinsky-testifies-to-congress-regarding-fy-2011-fmc-budget\/\">Chairman Lidinsky Testifies to Congress Regarding FY 2011 FMC Budget<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/chairman-lidinsky-testifies-to-congress-regarding-fy-2011-fmc-budget\/embed\/#?secret=3qgbKjFmut\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Chairman Lidinsky Testifies to Congress Regarding FY 2011 FMC Budget” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"3qgbKjFmut\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130529(57) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130591(57) Marilyn Kelly 130594(57) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. DEBRA JACKSON, Successor Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Shirley Justices Jackson, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130529 COA: 263766 Wayne CC: 04-421501-NH HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM, a/k/a HENRY FORD HOSPITAL, MICHAEL S. EICHENHORN, M.D., and VENCOR HOSPITAL, a/k/a KINDRED HOSPITALS EAST, L.L.C., d/b/a KINDRED HOSPITAL DETROIT, Defendants-Appellees, and

MICHIGAN HOSPITALISTS, P.C., and MASOOD AHMAD, M.D., Defendants-Appellants, and

HARPEL S. JANDE, M.D., Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

DEBRA JACKSON, Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Shirley Jackson, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130591 COA: 263766 Wayne CC: 04-421501-NH HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM, a/k/a HENRY FORD HOSPITAL, MICHAEL S. EICHENHORN, M.D., MICHIGAN HOSPITALISTS, P.C., MASOOD AHMAD, M.D., and_______________________________________ __ 2

HARPEL S. JANDE, M.D., Defendants-Appellees, and

VENCOR HOSPITAL, a/k/a KINDRED HOSPITALS EAST, L.L.C., d/b/a KINDRED HOSPITAL DETROIT, Defendant-Appellant..

________________ _______________ __________/

DEBRA JACKSON, Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Shirley Jackson, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130594 COA: 263766

HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM, a/k/a HENRY FORD HOSPITAL, and MICHAEL S. EICHENHORN, M.D., Defendants-Appellants, and Wayne CC: 04-421501-NH

VENCOR HOSPITAL, a/k/a KINDRED HOSPITALS EAST, L.L.C., d/b/a KINDRED HOSPITAL DETROIT, MICHIGAN HOSPITALISTS, P.C., and MASOOD AHMAD, M.D., Defendants-Appellees, and

HARPEL S. JANDE, M.D., Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s October 17, 2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of inVentiv Health, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David S. Bassin,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ DAVID S. BASSIN













November
6, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
inVentiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by inVentiv Health, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

DIGIMARC CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Digimarc Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, E.K. Ranjit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:
May 10, 2004

|By: |  | /s/E.K. RANJITE.K. Ranjit Chief Financial Officer | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------- | 

---



QuickLinks
#### Jerry O’NEIL; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE BAR OF MONTANA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-35928.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2009.

Jerry O’Neil, Columbia Falls, MT, pro se.

Dennis Woldstad, Trego, MT, pro se.

Melinda Woldstad, Trego, MT, pro se.

Michael McBroom, Olney, MT, pro se.

Gordon Sellner, Deer Lodge, MT, pro se.

Kimberly S. More, Crowley Fleck, Donald R. Murray, Jr., Hash, O’Brien, Biby & Murray, PLLP, Kalispell, MT, Jere Stuart Segrest, Assistant Attorney General, Chris D. Tweeten, Montana Attorney General, Helena, MT, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jerry O’Neil and others appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing their action challenging a judgment of the Montana Supreme Court affirming a state court determination that O’Neil has engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Noel v. Hall,*341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.

The district court properly concluded that the *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine barred the action as to the claims made by plaintiff O’Neil because it constitutes a “de *165facto appeal” of a state court decision, and raises additional claims that are “inextricably intertwined” with the prior state court decision. *Reusser v. Wachovia Bank, N.A., 525 F.3d 855,*859 (9th Cir.2008) (a federal action is barred if adjudication of the federal claims would undermine the state ruling or require the district court to review the application of state laws or procedural rules).

The district court properly concluded that the remaining plaintiffs failed to state a claim. *See Long v. County of Los Ange-les,*442 F.3d 1178, 1185 (9th Cir.2006) (to state a claim under section 1983, a plaintiff must allege that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated).

Appellants’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
|                  | (1)                                                  |   | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and               |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                                 |
|                  | (2)                                                  |   | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. |
|                  |                                                 |   |                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|                  |                                                 |   |
| Dated: March 21, 2011 |                                                 |   |
|                  |                                                 |   |
|                  | /s/ RODNEY HERSHBERGER                               |   |
|                  | Rodney Hershberger                                   |   |
|                  | President and Chief Executive Officer                |   |
|                  |                                                 |   |
|                  | /s/ JEFFERY T. JACKSON                               |   |
|                  | Jeffery T. Jackson                                   |   |
|                  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                  |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Clements  Golden  Phoenix
Enterprises,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,
2002, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I, Joseph  Rizzuti,  Chief  Executive  Officer (or  equivalent
thereof) of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                            /s/ Joseph Rizzuti
                           ------------------------------------------
                           Joseph Rizzuti
                           Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                           September 18, 2002
Exhibit 32.2


                      CERTIFICATION AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of SBT Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Anthony F. Bisceglio,
the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that:

     (i)  The Report for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

     (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The
Simsbury Bank & Trust Company, Inc.(2)



                                           /s/ Anthony F. Bisceglio, Ph.D.
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Anthony F. Bisceglio, Ph.D.
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 24, 2006


------------------------
(2) The Simsbury Bank & Trust Company, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company. In March 2006, the Company succeeded to the registration of Bank
pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) under the Exchange Act.
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Ocean Transportation Intermediary 

Foreign NVOCC Registration Terminations/Suspensions

September 22, 2017

AE Eagle Logistics Hong Kong Limited 

Org No.: 026251

Address: Units 13-16, 19/F, Tower A, Regent Centre

No. 63 Wo Yi Hop Road

N.T., Kwai Chung

Hong Kong

Termination: August 22, 2017

Reason: Name changed to Clearfreight Hong Kong Limited

Amsparx Holding Limited

Org No.: 026449

Address: Unit C&D, 22/F., Alliance Bldg.

No. 130-136, Connaught Road Central 

Sheung Wan 

Hong Kong

Termination: July 14, 2017

Reason: Name changed to Sparx Logistics Limited

China OCL Container Line., Ltd.

Org No.: 025696

Address: Room 512, Jingong Mansion, Jiefandbei Road

Heping District, Tianjin

China

Termination: July 2, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Cosco Logistics Japan Co., Ltd.

Org No.: 021945

Address: 33rd Floor, Kasumigaseki Common Gate West 

Tower, Kasumigaseki 3-2-1 Chiyoda-Ku

Tokyo 100-0013

Japan 

Termination: September 12, 2017

Reason: Name changed to Cosco Shipping Logistics (Japan)., Ltd.
Cyclone International PTY Ltd

dba Cyclone Global Logistics 

Org No.: 026214

Address: 1367 Botany Road

Botany, 2219 New South Wales

Australia 

Termination: July 23, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Dessert Marine Services (I) PVT. Ltd.

Org No.: 026237

Address: 2/F., D-208, Neelkanth Business Park 

Nathani Road, Vidyavihar (West), Maharashtra

Mumbai 400086 

India

Termination: July 6, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

En-Log Korea Co., Ltd

Org No.: 025679

Address: 504, 21, Centum 6-Ro 

Haeundae-Gu, Busan 

South Korea

Termination: July 14, 2017 

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Fastic Transportation Co., Ltd.

Org No.: 016605

Address: Room 702, Tianke Bldg. 

No. 1000, Pingliang Road, Yangpu District

Shanghai 200090 

China 

Termination: July 17, 2017 

Reason: Name changed to Fastic Shipping Co., Ltd.
Jungjin Logistics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

Org No.: 025244

Address: Room 1803, 18/F., Shenhua Commercial Bldg. 

No. 2018 Jiabin Road, Luohu District 

Shenzhen 518000 

China 

Termination: August 31, 2017 

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Ningbo East Crete International Logistics Co., Ltd

Org No: 025620

Address: 18F-8 China Eastern Bldg., No. 796

Zhongshan East Road

Ningbo 315000 

China 

Termination: July 2, 2017 

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129399 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan MARIO GATCHALIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129399 COA: 262004 Kent CC: 77-032800-DM FELICIDAD GATCHALIAN, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e July 21, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 27, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                           7,426,000
<SECURITIES>                     5,612,000
<RECEIVABLES>                      698,000
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                        206,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                14,405,000
<PP&E>                          69,412,102
<DEPRECIATION>                     469,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  86,799,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           10,555,000
<BONDS>                         45,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                      23,513,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    86,799,000
<SALES>                          8,352,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 7,884,000
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    6,732,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 998,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    154,000
<INCOME-TAX>                        78,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        76,000
<EPS-BASIC>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0



</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2853 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, with respect to eligibility for approval of a subsequent generic drug, to remove the barrier 

to that approval posed by the 180-day exclusivity period afforded to 

a first generic applicant that has not yet received final approval, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2021 

Mr. SCHRADER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, with 

respect to eligibility for approval of a subsequent generic 

drug, to remove the barrier to that approval posed by 

the 180-day exclusivity period afforded to a first generic 

applicant that has not yet received final approval, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bringing Low-cost Op5 tions and Competition while Keeping Incentives for New 

6 Generics Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘BLOCKING Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2853 IH

1 SEC. 2. CHANGE CONDITIONS OF FIRST GENERIC EXCLU2 SIVITY TO SPUR ACCESS AND COMPETITION. 

3 Clause (iv) of section 505(j)(5)(B) of the Federal 

4 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(5)(B)) 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in subclause (I), after ‘‘180 days after the 

7 date of the first commercial marketing of the drug 

8 (including the commercial marketing of the listed 

9 drug) by any first applicant’’ by inserting ‘‘or by an 

10 applicant whose application is approved pursuant to 

11 subclause (III)’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub13 clause: 

14 ‘‘(III) APPLICANT APPROVAL.—An applica15 tion containing a certification described in para16 graph (2)(A)(vii)(IV) that is for a drug for 

17 which a first applicant has submitted an appli18 cation containing such a certification can be ap19 proved notwithstanding the eligibility of a first 

20 applicant for the 180-day exclusivity period de21 scribed in subclause (II)(aa) if each of the fol22 lowing conditions is met: 

23 ‘‘(aa) The approval of such an appli24 cation could be made effective, but for the 

25 eligibility of a first applicant for 180-day 

26 exclusivity under this clause. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2853 IH

1 ‘‘(bb) At least 30 months have passed 

2 since the date of submission of an applica3 tion for the drug by at least one first ap4 plicant. 

5 ‘‘(cc) Approval of an application for 

6 the drug submitted by at least one first ap7 plicant is not precluded under clause (iii). 

8 ‘‘(dd) No application for the drug 

9 submitted by any first applicant is ap10 proved at the time the conditions under 

11 items (aa), (bb), and (cc) are all met, re12 gardless of whether such an application is 

13 subsequently approved.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.14


 


咨询与服务、业务合作解除协议


 


Consulting and service, business operation termination
agreement


 


 


甲方:北京量画科技有限公司


 


Party A: Beijing Lianghua Technology
Co., Limited


 


地址:北京市顺义区中关村科技园区顺义园临空二路1号


 


Address: No.1 Linkong Er Road, Zhongguan
Science and Technology Park, Shunyi District, Beijing City, China


 


乙方:有家有保(北京)科技有限公司


 


Party B: Youjiayoubao (Beijing) Technology
Co. Limited


 


地址:北京市顺义区中关村科技园区顺义园临空二路1号


 


Address: No.1 Linkong Er Road, Zhongguan
Science and Technology Park, Shunyi District, Beijing City, China


 


鉴于:







 


Whereas:


 


乙方股东已将全部股份转让给甲方,甲方已经是乙方的100%控股股东,双方协商如下:


 


The shareholders of Party B have transferred
all their shares to Party A. Party A is already the 100% controlling shareholder of Party B. The parties have negotiated as follows.


 


甲乙双方于2021
年 8 月 16 日签订的《咨询与服务协议》、《业务合作协议》,于本协议签订之日起终止。


 


1. The Consultation and Service Agreement
and the Business Operation Agreement signed by Party A and Party B on August 16, 2021 shall terminate from the date of signing this Agreement.





 


2、双方对合同期内的权利义务无异议,亦无纠纷。


 


2. Both parties have no objection
or any disputes over the rights and obligations during the contract period.


 


3、本协议自双方签署盖章之日起生效。


 


3. This Agreement shall come into
force upon being signed and sealed by both parties.


 


4、本协议以中文为准,
如中英文有异议的,以中文为准。


 


4. This agreement shall be in Chinese,
if there is any disagreement between Chinese and English, Chinese shall prevail.





 


	甲方(盖章):	乙方(盖章):
	Party A (seal):/seal/	Party B (seal):/seal/
	Beijing Lianghua Technology Co. Limited	Youjiayoubao(Beijing) Technology Co. Limited

	时间:	时间:
	Date: March 3, 2022	Date: March 3, 2022
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of China XD Plastics Company Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Taylor Zhang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
May 5, 2010





/s/
      Taylor ZhangTaylor
      Zhang
      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer