alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 212 (Friday, November 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 51328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23930]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15293 and #15294; U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Disaster 
Number VI-00009]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
U.S. Virgin Islands

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-4335-DR), dated 09/07/
2017.
    Incident: Hurricane Irma.
    Incident Period: 09/05/2017 through 09/07/2017.

DATES: Issued on 09/07/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/18/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/07/2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the U.S. Virgin Islands, dated 09/07/2017, is hereby 
amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical 
damages as a result of this disaster to 12/18/2017.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-23930 Filed 11-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
J. Pal-raguirre to include the sentence enhancements, see NRS 173.095 (providing that an information may be amended at any time before the verdict or finding "if no additional or different offense is charged and if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced"); Phipps v. State, 111 Nev. 1276, 1279, 903 P.2d 820, 822 (1995) (observing that oral amendments to a complaint or information are permissible "where they are detailed and specific and are eventually memorialized"). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

r----7 

### \-e

- -14 ,

4 Douglas

cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court, Dept. 20 Pitaro & Fumo, Chtd. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) (94Th (404.)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 31, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50486-50487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23618]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Senior Executive Service; Legal Division Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of members of the Legal Division Performance Review 
Board (PRB).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of members of the Legal 
Division PRB. The purpose of this Board is to review and make 
recommendations concerning proposed performance appraisals, ratings, 
bonuses, and other appropriate personnel actions for incumbents of SES 
positions in the Legal Division.

DATES: Effective Date: October 31, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of the General Counsel, 
Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Room 3000, 
Washington, DC 20220, Telephone: (202) 622-0283 (this is not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Composition of Legal Division PRB: The Board shall consist of at 
least three members. In the case of an appraisal of a career appointee, 
more than half the members shall consist of career appointees. 
Composition of the specific PRBs will be determined on an ad hoc basis 
from among the individuals listed in this notice.
    The names and titles of the PRB members are as follows:

[[Page 50487]]

    Paul Ahern, Assistant General Counsel (Enforcement & Intelligence);
    Brian Callanan, Deputy General Counsel;
    Himamauli Das, Counselor;
    Eric Froman, Principal Deputy Assistant General Counsel (Banking 
and Finance);
    Jean Gentry, Chief Counsel, U.S. Mint
    Anthony Gledhill, Chief Counsel, Alcohol Tobacco, Tax, and Trade 
Bureau;
    Elizabeth Horton, Deputy Assistant General Counsel (Ethics);
    Jimmy Kirby, Chief Counsel, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network;
    Jeffrey Klein, Deputy Assistant General Counsel (International 
Affairs);
    Steven D. Laughton, Assistant General Counsel (Banking and 
Finance);
    Robert Neis, Benefits Tax Counsel;
    Martha M. Pacold, Deputy General Counsel;
    Douglas Poms, Deputy International Tax Counsel;
    Joel Pulliam, Deputy Assistant General Counsel (Banking and 
Finance);
    Sidney Rocke, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Engraving and Printing;
    Bradley Smith, Chief Counsel, Office of Foreign Assets Control;
    Brian Sonfield, Assistant General Counsel (General Law, Ethics and 
Regulation);
    David Sullivan, Assistant General Counsel (International Affairs);
    Drita Tonuzi, Deputy Chief Counsel (Operations), Internal Revenue 
Service;
    Heather Trew, Deputy Assistant General Counsel (Enforcement & 
Intelligence);
    Krishna Vallabhaneni, Deputy Tax Legislative Counsel;
    Thomas West, Tax Legislative Counsel and;
    Paul Wolfteich, Chief Counsel, Bureau of the Fiscal Service.

    Dated: October 23, 2017.
Brent J. McIntosh,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2017-23618 Filed 10-30-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2

                            Section 906 Certification
                                     by the
               Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

         Each of Gary Valinoti, Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas J.
Mazzarisi, Chief Financial Officer, of JAG Media Holdings, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
April 30, 2003 ("Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/Gary Valinoti                           /s/ Thomas J. Mazzarisi
----------------                           -----------------------
Name: Gary Valinoti                        Name: Thomas J. Mazzarisi

Date: June 16, 2003                        Date: June 16, 2003
Exhibit 35.1

                                                          [LOGO] IndymacBank(SM)


                       REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance

I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transaction listed below and I certify:

a)    A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of
      its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth
      below IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

c)    None


                                By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
                                    ----------------------
                                    Robert M. Abramian
                                    First Vice President
                                    Home Loan Servicing
                                    Investor Reporting
                                    Indymac Bank


                                By: /s/ Barbara Perez
                                    ----------------------
                                    Barbara Perez
                                    Senior Vice President
                                    Indymac Bank



Prepared for:   Deutsche Bank

Date:           February 28, 2007

Ref:            651 - INABS 2006-A



                                                             www.indymacbank.com


             460 Sierra Madre Villa Ave., Pasadena, CA 91107   Tel: 626.535.5555
Exhibit 33.5
                                  ------------

          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                      2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-11148

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS MANUEL ALCAZAR ROJAS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:13-CR-25-1

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Manuel 

Alcazar Rojas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Alcazar Rojas has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 11, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-11148 Document: 00512695326 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2014
No. 13-11148

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

The record, however, reflects a clerical error in the written judgment. 

Alcazar Rojas was indicted for and pleaded guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§§ 2 and 2252(a)(2). However, the written judgment lists the statutes of 

conviction as “18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2.” Accordingly, we 

REMAND for correction of the clerical error in the written judgment in 

accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. See United States v. 

Higgins, 739 F.3d 733, 739 n.16 (5th Cir.), cert. denied (May 19, 2014) (No. 13-

9678); United States v. Rosales, 448 F. App’x 466, 466-67 (5th Cir. 2011).

2

 Case: 13-11148 Document: 00512695326 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/11/2014
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert James JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-10522.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 13, 2008.

Angie Lee Henson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert James Johnson, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Robert Johnson, federal prisoner # 34555-177, moves for a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his guilty-plea conviction and sentence. Johnson contends that his counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that Johnson’s state drug convictions did not qualify as “controlled substance offenses” on which a U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 enhancement could be based and for failing to file a requested notice of appeal.

To obtain a COA, Johnson must demonstrate that “reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000). Johnson did not raise in the district court the developed argument that he now presents with respect to his claim that his counsel was ineffective for not challenging whether the convictions were “controlled substance offenses.”

Issues that are not before the district court for a COA ruling will not be considered for the first time in a COA motion in this court. *See Whitehead v.*Johnson, 157 F.3d 384, 387-88 (5th Cir.1998). To the extent that Johnson did challenge the characterization of his convictions as controlled substance offenses, he has failed to show that reasonable jurists could conclude that his counsel was ineffective for not challenging the use of those convictions to enhance his sentence under § 4B1.1. Accordingly, the motion for a COA is DENIED as to that issue.

In conjunction with his claim that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a notice of appeal, Johnson alleged under penalty of perjury that he informed counsel that he wished to appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); *Roe v. Flores-Ortega,*528 U.S. 470, 477, 483, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000). Therefore, Johnson was not required to demonstrate that he would have presented meritorious issues on appeal. *Id.*at 485-86, 120 S.Ct. 1029. Because the record does not conclusively show that Johnson did not ask counsel to file a notice of appeal, an evidentiary hearing is needed. *See United States v. Tapp,*491 F.3d 263, 266 (5th Cir.2007).

*318Accordingly, the motion for a COA is GRANTED solely on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel. The judgment is VACATED and the case REMANDED for further development. We express no view on how the issue should be handled or ultimately resolved on remand.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Ruben Pablo VELASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-74972.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*250Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2010.

Dominic Edward Capeci, I, Esquire, Law Offices of Kaiser and Capeci, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Remi Adalemo, OIL, Briena Strippoli, Esquire, Blair O’Connor, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ruben Pablo Velasquez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his untimely motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and de novo questions of law. *Hernandez v. Mukasey,*524 F.3d 1014, 1017 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Velasquez’ motion to reopen to apply for humanitarian asylum under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(l)(iii)(B) because he did not file the motion within 90 days of the BIA’s final order of removal, *see 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and he failed to demonstrate material changed circumstances in Guatemala to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); *see also Toufi-ghi v. Mukasey,*538 F.3d 988, 996-97 (9th Cir.2008) (evidence must demonstrate pri-ma facie eligibility for relief in order to reopen proceedings based on changed circumstances).

We reject Velasquez’ contentions that the BIA applied improper standards of law in denying his motion to reopen because they are not supported by the record.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2710 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2710

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2022

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To increase transparency with respect to financial services benefitting 
    state sponsors of terrorism, human rights abusers, and corrupt 
                   officials, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Banking Transparency for Sanctioned 
Persons Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON FINANCIAL SERVICES BENEFITTING STATE SPONSORS OF 
              TERRORISM, HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSERS, AND CORRUPT OFFICIALS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of 
the Treasury shall issue a report to the Committees on Financial 
Services and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the 
Committees on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and Foreign Relations 
of the Senate that includes a copy of any license issued by the 
Secretary in the preceding 180 days that authorizes a United States 
financial institution (as defined under section 561.309 of title 31, 
Code of Federal Regulations) to provide financial services 
benefitting--
            (1) a state sponsor of terrorism; or
            (2) a person sanctioned pursuant to any of the following:
                    (A) Section 404 of the Russia and Moldova Jackson-
                Vanik Repeal and Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law 
                Accountability Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-208).
                    (B) Subtitle F of title XII of the National Defense 
                Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114-
                328, the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability 
                Act).
                    (C) Executive Order No. 13818.
    (b) Form of Report.--The report required under subsection (a) shall 
be submitted in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex.

SEC. 3. SUNSET.

    The reporting requirement under this Act shall terminate on the 
date that is the end of the 7-year period beginning on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. McCutcheon, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 9, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey A. McCutcheon
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                     |  | Jeffrey A. McCutcheon                            
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                    |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be retained by
LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.