alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 03-338 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2003 MT 301N JASOOG SANCHEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v. GREAT FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, In and for the County of Cascade, Cause No. ADV-02-969 The Honorable Thomas M. McKittrick, Judge presiding.
COUNSEL OF RECORD: For Appellant: Jasoog Sanchez, Great Falls, Montana, Pro Se For Respondent: Jean E. Faure; Church, Harris, Johnson & Williams, Great Falls, Montana

Submitted on Briefs: October 9, 2003 Decided: November 4, 2003 Filed:

__________________________________________ Clerk2 Chief Justice Karla M. Gray delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 1996 Internal Operating Rules, the following decision shall not be cited as precedent. It shall be filed as a public document with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and shall be reported by case title, Supreme Court cause number and result to the State Reporter Publishing Company and to West Group in the quarterly table of noncitable cases issued by this Court. ¶2 Jasoog Sanchez, appearing pro se , appeals from the Order RE: Motion to Dismiss entered by the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County. The issue is whether the District Court properly dismissed Sanchez’s petition for judicial review as untimely pursuant to § 49-2-501(4), MCA. We affirm. ¶3 On May 9, 2002, Sanchez filed a complaint with the Human Rights Bureau (Bureau), alleging Great Falls Public Schools (GFPS) had discriminated against her because of her race, national origin or color. The Bureau dismissed the complaint on timeliness grounds. The Human Rights Commission (Commission) affirmed the dismissal, noting that more than 180 days elapsed between the last date of alleged discrimination and the filing date. Sanchez petitioned the District Court for judicial review, and GFPS moved to dismiss. The District Court concluded the Commission properly dismissed the complaint because Sanchez had not timely filed it with the Bureau. ¶4 On appeal, Sanchez raises several issues. She does not cite to any authorities in support of her arguments in the opening brief. An appellant’s opening brief must contain citations to authorities in support of arguments. Rule 23(a)(4), M.R.App.P. We do not3 address arguments that lack citations to legal authorities. Saari v. Winter Sports, Inc. , 2003 MT 31, ¶ 14, 314 Mont. 212, ¶ 14, 64 P.3d 1038, ¶ 14 (citation omitted); In re L.S. , 2003 MT 12, ¶ 14, 314 Mont. 42, ¶ 14, 63 P.3d 497, ¶ 14 (citation omitted). Therefore, we do not consider Sanchez’s contentions. ¶5 Affirmed.
/S/ KARLA M. GRAY
We concur: /S/ JIM REGNIER /S/ W. WILLIAM LEAPHART /S/ JOHN WARNER /S/ PATRICIA COTTER
**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification (CFO)**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Brent Stumme, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of LoopNet, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238.];  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.     Date:  March 19, 2007 /s/ Brent Stumme         Brent Stumme    Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Finance and    Administration
China Marketing Media Holdings, Inc. - Exhibit 10.3 - Prepared By TNT
Filings Inc.









Exhibit 10.3 

Description of Verbal Amendment to Operation
and Management Right Agreement, dated 

October 23, 2003, by and between Sale and Marketing Publishing House and Shenzhen


Media Investment Co., Ltd. (the "Operation and Management Right Agreement")



In 2005 the parties to the Operation and
Management Right Agreement (the "Agreement") verbally agreed to amend the
Agreement to revise Section B of the Agreement to delete the following
sentences: 



  In addition, Party B promises that for the continuous three years from the
  commencement of the agreement, the realized annual income of Party A
  (including the sum of RMB 1,010,930 per year and the bonus dividend from Party
  B) would not be lower than the after-tax profit of Party A in the year end
  2003 (the "basic level") (based on the FY2003 accounting statement of Party
  A). In the case that the realized income of Party A is lower than the basic
  level, Party A will have a priority in collecting the shortage before Party B
  to pay any dividend to the shareholders, until restoring the realized income
  of Party A to the basic level. In the case that the realized income of Party A
  is higher than the basic level, Party A receives dividend from Party B
  according to the proportion of its shareholding. 



The parties have not yet memorialized this verbal understanding in writing,
but plan to do so in the second quarter of 2007.
#### AFTG-TG, LLC and Phillip M. Adams & Associates, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEATURE INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Via Technologies, Inc. Via Technologies, Inc. (USA), Via Technologies CPU, Inc., Centaur Technology, Defendants, and Silicon Integrated Systems Corporation and Silicon Integrated Systems Corporation (USA), Defendants-Appellees, and Standard Microsystems Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2011-1322.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 17, 2011.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the appellants’ motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal,

*885It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > News Articles > Industry Advisory – Requirement to File Timely and Accurate Service Contracts

Industry Advisory – Requirement to File Timely and Accurate Service Contracts


Posted on:


June 2, 2023 The Federal Maritime Commission reminds vessel-operating common carriers (VOCCs) they must file all service contracts and amendments to service contracts in the Commission’s SERVCON  system no later than thirty (30) days after the effective date. Failure to file service contracts in accordance with 46 CFR Part §530 could result in fines or other penalties. Filers must ensure that the effective date entered in SERVCON accurately reflects the effective date of the contract. Amendments to contracts must have prospective effect. Contracts must not make reference to terms that are not explicitly contained in the service contract, unless those terms are readily available to the parties and the Commission (46 CFR §530.8) For questions regarding service contracts, see Information on How to File Service Contracts or contact tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
 Industry Advisory  News Articles  VOCC
 Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
Org. Unit Location Status 

Seq. No Agency Bureau Abbreviation State City Country Total FTEs

Activity Fct. 

Code Status Reason

R

1 366-00 OS DC Washington US 1 D000 C A 2 366-00 OS DC Washington US 1 W601 C A 3 366-00 OS DC Washington US 2 D100 C A 4 366-00 OS-CADRS DC Washington US 1 D100 C` A 5 366-00 OS-CADRS DC Washington US 2 D200 C A 6 366-00 OS-LIB DC Washington US 1 D100 C A 7 366-00 OGC DC Washington US 1 D000 C A 8 366-00 OGC DC Washington US 1 D100 C A 9 366-00 ALJ DC Washington US 1 D000 C A 

10 366-00 BTA-DIR DC Washington US 1 D000 C A 11 366-00 BTA-DIR DC Washington US 2 D101 C A 12 366-00 BTA-DIR DC Washington US 1 D100 C A 13 366-00 BTA-OSCT DC Washington US 1 D000 C A 14 366-00 BTA-OSCT DC Washington US 4 D200 C A 15 366-00 BTA-OECA DC Washington US 4 D101 C A 16 366-00 BTA-OECA DC Washington US 1 D100 C A 17 366-00 BTA-OA DC Washington US 2 D000 C A 18 366-00 BTA-OA DC Washington US 3 D200 C A 19 366-00 BCL-DIR DC Washington US 1 D100 C A 20 366-00 BCL-DIR DC Washington US 1 D000 C A 21 366-00 BCL-OPVIP DC Washington US 1 D000 C A 22 366-00 BCL-OPVIP DC Washington US 4 D200 C A 23 366-00 BCL-OTI DC Washington US 1 D000 C A 24 366-00 BCL-OTI DC Washington US 6 D200 C A 25 366-00 BOE DC Washington US 2 D000 C A 26 366-00 BOE DC Washington US 2 D100 C A 27 366-00 OPS-HQ DC Washington US 1 D000 C A 28 366-00 OPS-HQ DC Washington US 2 D100 C A 29 366-00 OPS-NY NY New York US 2 D100 C A 30 366-00 OPS-NO LA NewOrleans US 1 D100 C A 31 366-00 OPS-FL FL Miami US 2 D100 C A 32 366-00 OPS-LA CA Los Angeles US 1 D100 C A 33 366-00 OPS-SE WA Seattle US 1 D100 C A 34 366-00 OA-DIR DC Washington US 2 D100 C A 35 366-00 OA-OIT DC Washington US 5 W601 C A 36 366-00 OA-OHR DC Washington US 3 B700 C A 
37 366-00 OA-OBFM DC Washington US 1 C000 C A 

38 366-00 OA-OBFM DC Washington US 1 C302 C A 39 366-00 OA-OBFM DC Washington US 1 C307 C A 40 366-00 OA-OBFM DC Washington US 1 C400 C A 41 366-00 OA-OMS DC Washington US 1 D100 C A 42 366-00 OA-OMS DC Washington US 2 F000 C A 43 366-00 OA-OMS DC Washington US 1 F200 C A 44 366-00 IG DC Washington US 1 I430 C A 45 366-00 OCOM DC Washington US 5 Y105 I46 366-00 OCOM DC Washington US 3 Y415 I47 366-00 OS DC Washington US 1 Y810 I48 366-00 OS DC Washington US 1 Y815 I49 366-00 OS-CADRS DC Washington US 1 Y405 I50 366-00 OS-CADRS DC Washington US 4 Y415 I51 366-00 OGC DC Washington US 2 Y405 I52 366-00 OGC DC Washington US 7 Y415 I53 366-00 ALJ DC Washington US 1 Y405 I54 366-00 BTA-DIR DC Washington US 2 D702 I55 366-00 BTA-OSCT DC Washington US 1 D702 I56 366-00 BTA-OA DC Washington US 1 D702 I57 366-00 BCL-DIR DC Washington US 2 D702 I58 366-00 BCL-OPVIP DC Washington US 1 D702 I59 366-00 BCL-OTI DC Washington US 1 D702 I60 366-00 BOE DC Washington US 2 Y405 I61 366-00 BOE DC Washington US 4 Y415 I62 366-00 OPS-HQ DC Washington US 1 Y210 I63 366-00 OPS-HQ DC Washington US 1 Y405 I64 366-00 OA-DIR DC Washington US 2 D702 I65 366-00 OA-OIT DC Washington US 1 W100 I66 366-00 OA-OHR DC Washington US 1 B720 I67 366-00 OA-OBFM DC Washington US 1 C314 I68 366-00 OA-OMS DC Washington US 1 F310 I69 366-00 IG DC Washington US 1 I110 I70 366-00 EEO DC Washington US 1 B501 I
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 09/09-0481]

Notice is hereby given that Propel Venture Partners US Fund, L.P., 201 Mission Street, 25th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concerns, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Propel Venture Partners US Fund, L.P. proposes to purchase common stock of Kasisto, Inc. from BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. (“BBVA”). Kasisto has requested the transaction because it prefers the shares to be held by a venture investor who will support the continued growth of the company.

                    The proposed transaction is brought within the purview of section 107.730 of the Regulations because BBVA is the sole owner of Propel Venture Partners US Fund, L.P. BBVA is considered an Associate of Propel Venture Partners US Fund, L.P. pursuant to section 107.50. Therefore, the proposed transaction is considered self-deal pursuant to 13 CFR 107.730 and requires a regulatory exemption. Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business                           ( print page 50209)                        Administration, 409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC 20416.                

Dated: October 23, 2017.

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator for Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2017-23499 Filed 10-27-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
[No. 66761-1-I.

Division One.

October 29, 2012.]

#### CD Trust UTD 10/22/92 et al., *Respondents,*v. Quality Loan Service Corp., *as Trustee,*et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 10-2-06034-9, Michael T. Downes, J., entered February 7, 2011 *.Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Becker, J.,

concurred in by Leach, C.J., and Grosse, J.
Motion Granted; Order filed December 13, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 01066

- CR NO. 14

- 15

- 01067

- CR NO. 14

- 15

- 01068

- CR

____________ DYLAN ANDREW QUICK , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1383658 , 1383659, & 1383660



### ORDERAppellant filed a motion , pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure

34.6(d ), to supplement the record with State's Exhibit 100. The court reporter did not file this exhibit with the record. The motion is granted.

The clerk of the 339th District Court is directed to deliver State's Exhibit 100
to the c lerk of this court on or before December 29, 2016.

PER CURIAM
| 1.     | Such      Yearly Report of Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                           |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year      ended December 31, 2008, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of HSM Holdings,      Inc. |

| Date:       January  27, 2009          |
|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |
| HSM      Holdings, Inc.                          |
|                                             |
| By: /s/      Simone Crighton                |
| Simone      CrightonChief      Financial Officer |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Luis Mauricio CRUZ-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40676

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Mauricio Cruz-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Cruz-Ramirez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6331
TERRY LEE TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus M. D. GAGLIONE, Doctor; M. D. MATTHEWS, Doctor; VIRGINIA BEACH MEDICAL DEPARTMENT FACILITY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-96-90-AM) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Lee Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Gaglione , No. CA-96-90-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 1996).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
OrgNo Organization Name Reason for Action Termination 

Date

023722 LIGENTIA ASIA LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 11/15/2020

027879 SHANGHAI LINX INTERNATIONAL FORWARDING CO., LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 11/20/2020

028166 SHANGHAI SYT INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS CO., LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 11/19/2020

025254 SYNCRO LOGISTICS, SRL Failure to timely renew 11/16/2020

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Foreign Registered NVOCC Termination & Surrenders

October 25 to November 23, 2020
OrgNo Organization Name Reason for Action Termination 

Date

026864 ASIA MASTER LOGISTICS LIMITED Failure to maintain a bond 8/26/2020

025153 E2E SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT LIMITED Failure to Timely Renew 9/3/2020

017245 GOLDEN BRIDGE EXPRESS CO., LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 8/27/2020

027892 LI TIAN INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS CO., LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 9/3/2020

026862 SHENZHEN CHANNELTON LOGISTICS DEVELOPMENT  Failure to maintain a bond 9/5/2020

026895 TOPFOR LOGISTICS (CANADA) INC. Voluntary Surrender 9/15/2020

023405 TRANSBORDER S.A.S. Voluntary Surrender 8/30/2020

026268 WM CONTAINER LINE LIMITED Failure to maintain a bond 9/2/2020

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Foreign Registered NVOCC Termination & Surrenders

September 2020
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3305 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 224 South Boulder Avenue in Tulsa, 

Oklahoma, as the ‘‘H. Dale Cook Federal Building and 

United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3305 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse 

3 located at 224 South Boulder Avenue in Tulsa, Oklahoma, 

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘H. Dale Cook Fed5 eral Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

9 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec10 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘H. Dale 

11 Cook Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS