alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2698 

To extend the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

to include oversight of markets which set reference prices for aluminum 

premiums, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2021 

Mr. LAWSON of Florida (for himself and Mr. BUCK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To extend the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to include oversight of markets which 

set reference prices for aluminum premiums, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aluminum Pricing Ex5 amination Act’’ or the ‘‘APEX Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2698 IH

1 SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OF THE COMMODITY FUTURES 

2 TRADING COMMISSION OVER MARKETS 

3 WHICH SET OR REPORT REFERENCE PRICES 

4 FOR ALUMINUM PREMIUMS. 

5 Section 2(a)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 

6 U.S.C. 2(a)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(J)(i) The Commission shall have jurisdiction over 

9 the markets, including the process, oversight, trans10 parency, and manner in which reference prices for alu11 minum premiums are set or reported, and whether the 

12 mechanism for setting such reference prices is fair and 

13 transparent. However, nothing in this Act shall be con14 strued to grant the Commission the authority to set or 

15 control prices for aluminum premiums. 

16 ‘‘(ii)(I) The Commission shall consult with the Attor17 ney General on any relevant information, allegations of 

18 anticompetitive conduct, or marketplace analysis in the 

19 setting or reporting of such a reference price. 

20 ‘‘(II) The Commission shall afford the Attorney Gen21 eral an opportunity to review any regulation or guideline 

22 proposed by the Commission in carrying out this subpara23 graph to ensure that the regulation or guideline is con24 sistent with the goals and purposes of the antitrust laws. 

25 ‘‘(III) The Attorney General may cooperate with, and 

26 share relevant information with, the Commission, with reVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:41 Jun 02, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2698.IH H2698

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2698 IH

1 spect to the setting of such a reference price, and shall 

2 review any such proposed regulation or guideline to ensure 

3 that the regulation or guideline is in accordance with the 

4 goals and purposes of the antitrust laws. 

5 ‘‘(IV) The Attorney General shall transmit to the 

6 Commission the views of the Attorney General on any such 

7 proposed regulation or guideline.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EX-10.5






Dear Maynard,



On April 5, 2002, CSK Auto Corporation awarded to you stock options to purchase 50,000 shares
of CSK Auto common stock at an exercise price of $9.87/share with a three year vesting schedule
(the “Option Contract”). This letter agreement, which is being entered into contemporaneously with
an amendment to your Employment Agreement, is intended to amend the exercise period relative to
such options upon your Retirement (as defined below) from the Company. Capitalized terms not
defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to in the 1996 Executive Stock Option Plan (“1996
Plan”).



Prior to the execution of this letter agreement, pursuant to the terms of your stock option
grant, if your relationship with the Company, its Parent and Subsidiaries as an employee terminates
for any reason (other than as a result of death or Disability), you may exercise stock options, to
the extent exercisable on the date of such termination, at any time during the 30 days commencing
six months after the date of such termination, but not thereafter.



In view of your past services, notwithstanding any other provision of the Option Contract or the
1996 Plan relating to these options, if you cease to be an employee or director of the Company or
any subsidiary or parent of the Company by reason of retirement (provided that you have attained
the age of 65 and the sum of your age and years of service with the Company is 75 or higher)
(herein, “Retirement”), the stock options shall remain exercisable for (and, subject to federal
securities laws, including laws regarding insider trading, and any other exercise restrictions set
forth in the governing stock option plan and contract, as modified by this letter agreement, may be
exercised at any time during), and shall expire (unless exercised), six months after such
termination of employment, but in no event later than December 31, 2007. In the event of
termination for any other reason, the original terms of the Option Contract and 1996 Plan shall
govern.



In order to satisfy certain requirements under the federal tax code in connection with the
afore-described modification of your options, your signature below is deemed to be an acceptance of
CSK Auto’s offer to modify the exercise period and term for these stock options.



Please note that CSK Auto is not providing here nor will it provide tax, legal or financial
advice. You are urged to consult your own advisors in connection with taking any action with
respect to your stock options.




CSK AUTO CORPORATION



	 	 	 
	By:     

Dale Ward

Executive Vice President

	 	     

Date



	 
	 	 
	     

Maynard Jenkins

	 	     

Date







     




Tax Identification No. / Soc. Sec. No.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Huiheng Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  June 23, 2011By:
/s/ Richard ShenName:  Richard ShenTitle:  Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-2087EA

United States of America,

*

*

*

v. District of Arkansas.

Frederick Lee Jackson, [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant.

_____________

Filed: January 22, 1999

Before FAGG, HEANEY, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

ederick o

ibute )

nd 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(1)(B)(i) (1994). Jackson contends the district court

mitted )

 of certain assets associated with drug trafficking into drug quantities fo

sentencing because the PSR included assets titled in the names of other people. W

disa

officer stated, 

Mr. Jackson’s. . . . If it had anyone else’s 
-2-

record contains no evidence disputing the accuracy of the probation officer’s

explanatory statement, and thus the district court did not commit clear error by

accepting the PSR calculation. See , 21 F.3d 243, 247-48, 249-

r. 1994); United States v. Wise

(en banc); United States v. Haren

We thus affirm Jackson’s sentence.

A true copy.

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the quarterly report of PalWeb Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Warren F. Kruger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


January 19, 2005                               /s/ Warren F. Kruger
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Warren F. Kruger, Chief Executive
                                               Officer


            A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

            The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered
filed as part of the Report.
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Ocean Transportation Intermediary 

Foreign NVOCC Registration Terminations/Suspensions

July 2018

GEFCO

Org No.: 010412

Address: 77 A 81 Eur Des Lilas D’Espagne

B.P. 313

92402 Courbevoie Cedex

France 

Termination: July 18, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

L’Assurex International Logistics LTD.

Org No.: 026735

Address: Room 209 AIJI-Catic Bldg.

No. 4 Yuehua Road

Xiamen 36100

China

Termination: July 20, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

M.O.T. Intermodal Shipping Inc.

Org No.: 017041

Address: 400-645 Wellington Street

Montreal, Quebec

H3C 0L1

Canada

Termination: July 14, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Peltransport LTD.

Org No.: 010573

Address: 9 Tverski Street

Tel Aviv

Israel

Termination: July 06, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report ofFreestone Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the datesindicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.           theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationof the Company.

 

 

Dated:  November 14, 2011

 

/s/ Clayton Carter

 

Name: Clayton Carter

Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Dated:  November 14, 2011

 

/s/ James F. Carroll                                                       

 

James F. Carroll                                           

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.5  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of TAM Capital Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Egberto Vieira Lima, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 23, 2012 By:

   /s/ Egberto Vieira LimaEgberto Vieira LimaChief Executive Officer


---
#### Gulam MOSTOFA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-72047.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*649Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 21, 2011.

Ahmed M. Abdallah, Esquire, Hollywood, CA, for Petitioner.

Janette L. Allen, Esquire, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gulam Mostofa, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. *He v. Gonzales,*501 F.3d 1128, 1130-31 (9th Cir.2007). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Mostofa’s motion to reopen as untimely where the motion was filed over six years after the BIA’s final administrative order, *see 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Mostofa failed to establish changed circumstances in Bangladesh to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limitation for filing motions to reopen. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(h); *see also Malty v. Ashcroft,*381 F.3d 942, 945 (9th Cir.2004) (“The critical question is ... whether circumstances have changed sufficiently that a petitioner who previously did not have a legitimate claim for asylum now has a well-founded fear of future persecution.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**DIGIMARCCORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the periodic report of DigimarcCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, BruceDavis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the datehereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of theUnited States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

This Certification has not been, and shall not bedeemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Date: April 7, 2005

 
| By:    |    /s/ Bruce Davis    | * * |
|--------|--------------------------------------|----------|
|   | Bruce Davis*Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2007,                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended December 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of Voiceserve,                Inc. |

| Date: July                12, 2007                                                                                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                            |
| Voiceserve,                Inc.                                                                                                                 |
|                                                                                                                                            |
| By:                /s/                *Michael                Bibleman            * |
| Michael                BibelmanChief                Executive Officer                                                                           |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RAYMOND A. MIKELONIS SR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 71 WM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2020, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Amended Annual Report of So Act Network, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Greg
Halpern, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of So
      Act Network, Inc.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




SO ACT
NETWORK, INC.




By:
            /s/
      Greg HalpernGreg
      HalpernChief
      Executive Officer,
              Chief
      Financial Officer,




Date:
July 30, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 50928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23875]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10190]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Object Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: ``Portraits of the World: Switzerland'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that a certain object to be included in the exhibition 
``Portraits of the World: Switzerland,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural 
significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with 
the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the exhibit object at the National Portrait Gallery, 
Smithsonian Institution, Washington, District of Columbia, from on or 
about December 15, 2017, until on or about November 12, 2018, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elliot Chiu in the Office of the Legal 
Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0172646275686e6f333534384172756075642f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a1d2c4c2d5c8cecf93959498e1d2d5c0d5c48fc6ced7">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of 
December 11, 2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
determinations be published in the Federal Register.

Alyson Grunder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-23875 Filed 11-1-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Rita Maguire, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Michael Maguire, Deceased, Appellant, v Southland Corporation, Doing Business as 7-Eleven, Respondent.

[665 NYS2d 680]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated September 9, 1996, as granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To establish a prima facie case of negligence in a “slip and fall” case, the plaintiffs must demonstrate that the defendant either created the condition which caused the accident, or had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition and a reasonable time within which to correct it or warn about its ex*348istence *(see, Bykofsky v Waldbaum’s Supermarkets,*210 AD2d 280; *Lewis v Metropolitan Transp. Auth.,*99 AD2d 246, *affd*64 NY2d 670; *Madrid v City of New York,*53 AD2d 517, *affd*42 NY2d 1039). The only issue on this appeal involves constructive notice. To constitute constructive notice, a defect must be visible and apparent, and it must exist for a sufficient length of time prior to the accident to permit discovery and a remedy *(see, Lewis v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., supra,*at 249). Moreover, a “general awareness” that a dangerous condition may be present is legally insufficient to constitute notice of the particular condition that caused an injury *(see, Piacquadio v Recine Realty Corp.,*84 NY2d 967, 968).

The plaintiffs failed to submit admissible evidence that rain water had accumulated on the floor of the defendant’s store for a sufficient length of time prior to the plaintiffs’ decedent’s accident, so as to charge the defendant with constructive notice of a dangerous condition. Without evidence legally sufficient to permit a jury to rationally infer that the defendant had constructive notice of a dangerous condition, the defendant cannot be held liable for failure to warn or to remedy the defect. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Thompson and Altman, JJ., concur.