alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Maritime Commission
 

Public Forum on Port Congestion
 

Location:	 Port of Los Angeles Administration Building 

425 South Palos Verdes Street 

San Pedro, CA 90731 

Date:	 Monday, September 15, 2014 

Time:	 9:30 AM – 4:30 PM 

Join the conversation: #portforumLA 

8:45 AM 	 Arrival & Registration 

9:30 AM	 Welcome and Opening Remarks 

9:45 AM	 Elected Officials’ Remarks 

10:15 AM	 Port Authority Executive Directors’ Remarks 

 

10:30 AM	 Panel Discussion (Sector) / Q&A 

11:15 AM	 Break 

11:30 AM	 Confirmed Additional Speakers 

12:30 AM	 Lunch 

2:00 PM	 Open Public Discussion / Q&A (Topics TBD After Morning Discussion) 

4:00 PM	 Closing Remarks
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of SFBC International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I David Natan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ DAVIDNATAN*        
| | David Natan            
| | Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 15, 2006

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felipe Daniel TAPIA-ROMERO, a/k/a David Perales Meraz, Daniel Pato, Felipe Daniel Pato, Felipe Romero Pato, Felipe Romero, Felipe Daniel Romero, Daniel Sanchez, Danny Tapia, Felipe Tapia, Felipe Daniel Tapia, Felipe Romero Tapia, Felipe Daniel Topia, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50121.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 2006.

Submission deferred Nov. 22, 2006.

Resubmitted April 24, 2008.

Filed May 1, 2008.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., Ranee A. Katzenstein, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Pamela L. Johnston, Esq., Foley & Lardner, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jonathan D. Libby, Esq., FPDCA— Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: BEEZER, T.G. NELSON, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Felipe Daniel Tapia-Romero appeals his sentence and several terms of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm on all but one issue in this memorandum disposition. We address the remaining issue — whether the district court erred by declining to consider, under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the cost to society of a defendant’s term of imprisonment — in an accompanying opinion.

The sentence imposed by the district court was neither proeedurally erroneous nor substantively unreasonable. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (“[Ojnly a proeedurally erroneous or substantively unreasonable sentence will be set aside.”). That the district court, after considering all the relevant facts, chose to place more emphasis on Tapia-Romero’s recidivism than on facts that *might*be interpreted to reflect more favorably on Tapia-Romero merely shows that the court appropriately exercised its discretion. *See id.*(“The abuse of discretion standard applies to all sentencing decisions .... ”).

*634The district court did not plainly err when it allowed the probation officer to determine Tapia-Romero’s share of the treatment costs. *See United States v. Du-pas,*419 F.3d 916, 922-24 (9th Cir.2005). Finally, the district court did not violate Tapia-Romero’s Fifth Amendment rights when it imposed the reporting requirement. *See United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez,*441 F.3d 767, 772-73 (9th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Freestone Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  October 16, 2007



/s/ James F. Carroll



Name: James F. Carroll

Title:  Chief Executive Officer







Dated:  October 16, 2007



/s/ James F. Carroll



Name: James F. Carroll

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER BURTON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D13-2904 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ )

Opinion filed August 29, 2014.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; William Fuente, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

LaROSE, Judge.

Christopher Burton appeals the postconviction court's order den ying his

motion to correct an illegal sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure

3.800(a). Because Mr. Burton received a mandatory sentence of life without the- 2 - possibility of parole for a first-degree murder he committed wh en he was sixteen years

old, we reverse the portion of the postconviction court's order summarily denying his

motion and remand the case for further proceedings consistent w ith Miller v. Alabama,

132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), and Toye v. State, 133 So. 3d 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). See

also Baker v. State

, 138 So. 3d 1175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Landrum v. State, 133 So. 3 d

601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Reversed and remanded.

KHOUZAM and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 26, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21A0783. KEVIN MASSENGALE v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors 

and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On January 13, 2021, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors 

and a brief no later than January 22, 2021. As of the date of this order, the appellant's 

enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed 

abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).

Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate 

review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 

264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995):

This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a 

brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while 

you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's 

failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, 

you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time 

appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will 

have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the 

trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the 

trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days 

from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a 

notice of appeal from that order.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 26, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to 

the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy 

of this order to the appellant.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15338 and #15339; GEORGIA Disaster Number GA-00101]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 3.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4338-DR), dated 09/28/2017.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Irma.                    

*Incident Period:*                         09/07/2017 through 09/20/2017.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 09/28/2017.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/27/2017.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/28/2018.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Georgia, dated 09/28/2017, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     DeKalb, Haralson                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2017-23934 Filed 11-2-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10184]

Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (“INA”), and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the designation of the aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the designation and that the national security of the United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation.

Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be maintained.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: October 11, 2017.

Rex W. Tillerson,

Secretary of State .

[FR Doc. 2017-23791 Filed 10-31-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Meeting Schedule for December 11, 2013","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"juZfUVwgDs\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-schedule-for-december-11-2013\/\">Commission Meeting Schedule for December 11, 2013<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-schedule-for-december-11-2013\/embed\/#?secret=juZfUVwgDs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Schedule for December 11, 2013” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"juZfUVwgDs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** CONCURRING OPINION
N o. 04

- 17

- 00099

- CV Victor RAMOS , Appellant

v. CITY OF LAREDO , Appellee From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015CVT003985 D2 Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Concurring Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Delivered and Filed: March 2 8 , 2018 I write separately to point out my concern about a potential unintended consequence of section 101.106(e) of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code (“the Code”). The take

- nothing judgment entered in the underlying cause is the “untenable” result this co urt forecasted could occur
in Franka v. Velasquez , 216 S.W.3d 409, 413 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2006), rev’d , 332 S.W.3d 367 (Tex. 2011). A governmental entity should not be permitted to demand that its employee be dismissed from a lawsuit under section 101 .106(e) of the Code and then, after the employee is dismissed from the lawsuit, attempt to assert immunity or otherwise avoid liability by arguing the employee was not within the course and scope of his employment. Fortunately, the City’s judicialConcurring Opinion 04

- 17

- 00099

- CV

- 2

- admissi on precludes it from capitalizing on that approach in this case. This case does, however, demonstrate the need for the Legislature to consider amending the statute to prevent what must be an unintended consequence. Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Order entered March 2 3 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 19 - 01250 - CR LONNIE BERNARD JONES JR., Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 3 63rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 17 - 70555 - W

O RDER T he reporter ’ s record was due January 31, 2020. By postcard dated February 4, 2020, we notified official court reporter Darline King that the reporter ’ s record

was overdue and di rected her to file (1) the reporter ’ s record, (2) written

ver ification that no hearings were recorded, or (3) written verification that appellant has not requested the reporter ’ s record by March 5 , 2020

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.3(b) (official reporter responsible for ensuring timely filed reporter ’ srecord). To date, the reporter ’ s recor d has not been filed and we have had no

communication from Ms. King

. We ORDER court reporter Darline King file the complete reporter’s record in th is appeal by April 20, 2020 . We caution Ms. King that the failure to file the reporter’s record by that date may result in the Court taking what ever action it deems appropriate to ensure that th is appeal proceed s in a more timely fashion, which may include ordering th at she not sit as a court reporter until the record in th is appeal is filed. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Tracy Holmes , Presiding Judge, 363rd Judicial District Court; Darline King , court reporter, 363rd Judicial Distri ct Court; and to counsel for all part ies.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Findex.com, Inc. (the “company”) on Form
      10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Kirk R.
      Rowland, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted),
      that
      to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the company at the end of the periods covered by the Periodic Report.





In
          Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of
          this 19th day of
          January, 2006.


By
            /s/
                Kirk R. RowlandKirk
                R. Rowland, CPAChief
                Financial Officer
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, John A. Vella, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding Trust 2006-AR2 (the
     "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
     fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
     materials respect; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee.

     Dated: July 14, 2008

     /s/ John A. Vella
     Signature

     President and CEO
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the servicer)
Exhibit 31.1


Certification
Pursuant To
 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant To
 Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of MagneGas Corporation (the "Company") on
Amended Form 10-KSB for the twelve months ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dr. Ruggero Maria
Santilli, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results
of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/Dr. Ruggero Maria
Santilli
 Dr.
Ruggero Maria Santilli
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 Dated:
August 11, 2008