alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jose Luis CARREON-LUGO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72549.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 22, 2011.

Barbara K. Strickland, Law Offices of Barbara K. Strickland, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.

Drew Brinkman, Tracey McDonald, OIL, Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr., Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Luis Carreon-Lugo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order sustaining the government’s appeal from an immigration judge’s decision granting his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, *Hernandez v. Mu-kasey,*524 F.3d 1014, 1017 (9th Cir.2008), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that Carreon-Lugo failed to show that his removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his qualifying relatives. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). Carreon-Lugo’s contentions that the BIA engaged in improper factfinding, failed to consider all the evidence, and failed to consider the cumulative impact of his hardship evidence are not supported by the record and do not amount to colorable legal or constitutional claims. *See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552*F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir.2009); *see also 8*C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3)(ii) (BIA may review questions of law, discretion, and judgment de novo).

Contrary to Carreon-Lugo’s contention, the BIA’s interpretation of the hardship standard falls within the broad range authorized by the statute. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D); *Ramirez-Perez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 1001, 1004-06 (9th Cir. 2003).

Carreon-Lugo’s claim that the government’s appeal to the BIA was defective is not supported by the record.

Carreon-Lugo’s remaining contention is not persuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert A. DELSMAN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 09-16809.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 21, 2011.

*652Seth Isaac Appel, Ian Kenneth Boyd, Harvey Siskind LLP, San Francisco, CA, Gregory T. Casmento, Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP, Houston, TX, pro se.

Paul Alan Levy, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Robert A. Delsman, an Individual, Eureka, CA, pro se.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. appeals from the district court’s order dismissing its action alleging, inter alia, defamation and trade libel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Price *v. Stossel,*620 F.3d 992, 999 (9th Cir.2010), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Sedgwick’s defamation and trade libel claims under California’s anti-SLAPP statute because defendant Delsman’s conduct was in furtherance of his free speech rights in connection with an issue of public interest, and Sedgwick did not meet its burden of establishing a probability of prevailing on its claims. *See*Cal.Civ.Proc. Code § 425.16; *Ruiz v. Harbor View Cmty. Ass’n,*134 Cal.App.4th 1456, 37 Cal.Rptr.3d 133, 140-46 (Ct.App.2005) (setting forth § 425.16 analysis, and concluding that defendant’s letter containing rhetorical hyperbole was free speech in connection with an issue of public interest and that plaintiff did not establish a probability of prevailing on his libel claim).

Sedgwick’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-13-00433-CR 

HAROLD WAYNE CAMPA, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 242nd District Court 

Hale County, Texas 

Trial Court No. B19400-1302, Honorable Edward Lee Self, Presiding 

 

July 7, 2014 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., and BOYD, S.J.1 

Harold Wayne Campa, appellant, appeals his conviction for Driving While 

Intoxicated. Appellant was tried and found guilty by a jury and was assessed five years 

in prison. Appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, together with an Anders2

brief, wherein he certifies that, after diligently searching the record, he has concluded 

that the appeal is without merit. Along with his brief, he has filed a copy of a letter sent 

 

1

Senior Justice John T. Boyd, sitting by assignment.

2

See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). 
2

to appellant informing him of counsel’s belief that there was no reversible error and of 

appellant’s right to file a pro se response. By letter dated May 16, 2014, this court also 

notified appellant of his right to file his own brief or response by June 16, 2014, if he 

wished to do so. To date, no response has been received. 

In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders, appellate counsel 

discussed potential areas for appeal which included the indictment, pretrial discovery, a 

pretrial motion for continuance, motion to suppress a recorded statement, adverse 

rulings made at trial, jury selection and charge, sufficiency of the evidence to support 

conviction and the punishment assessed, and the denial of a motion for new trial. 

However, he then explained why the issues lacked merit. 

In addition, we conducted our own review of the record to assess the accuracy of 

counsel’s conclusions and to uncover arguable error pursuant to In re Schulman, 252 

S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) and Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 508 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1991). After doing so, we concurred with counsel’s conclusions. 

Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is affirmed.3

Brian Quinn 

Chief Justice

Do not publish.

 

3

Appellant has the right to file a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal 

Appeals.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Service Contract Inventory Analysis","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hbMieVmiT9\"><a href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/governmentwide-laws-regulations\/service-contract-analysis\/\">Service Contract Inventory Analysis<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/about-the-fmc\/governmentwide-laws-regulations\/service-contract-analysis\/embed\/#?secret=hbMieVmiT9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Service Contract Inventory Analysis” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"hbMieVmiT9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 212 (Friday, November 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 51253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. and its 
continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on November 8, 2017.

PLACE:  999 E Street NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 
30109.
    Matters relating to internal personnel decisions, or internal rules 
and practices.
    Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to 
have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed 
Commission action.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
* * * * *

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Judith Ingram, Press Officer 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-24026 Filed 11-1-17; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Organic Sales and Marketing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Keith
D. Lowey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
February 11,
2011





By:
                    /s/Keith D.
      LoweyKeith
      D. Lowey, CPAChief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




The Board
of Directors


ENSURAPET,
INC.




We hereby
consent to the use in this Annual Report of ENSURAPET, INC. of our report dated
April 15, 2009, for the consolidated balance sheets of ENSURAPET, INC. as of the
period ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for
each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2008; and from July 20,
2005 (inception) to December 31, 2008.




/s/
      Lawrence Scharfman, CPALawrence
      Scharfman, CPABoynton
      Beach, FloridaApril
      15, 2009
Wilshire Credit Corporation
Payments
P.O. Box 30040; Los Angeles, CA  90030-0040
or   P.O. Box 650314; Dallas, TX  75265-0314
Correspondence

P.O. Box 8517; Portland, OR  97207-8517
Phone

(503) 952-7947
(888) 502-0100
Fax

(503) 952-7476
Web Site

www.wfsg.com
Exhibit 35 [Wilshire logo]
Exhibit T CERTIFICATION OF SERVICER March 1, 2007 Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc. 250 Vesey Street
4 World Financial Center, 10
th
Floor
New York, New York  10080
U.S. Bank National Association 60 Livingston Avenue Mail Code EP-MN-WS3D St. Paul, Minnesota 55107-2292 Attn: Structured Finance/SURF 2006-BC1
Re:
Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as February 1, 2006 among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as Depositor, Wilshire Credit Corporation, as Servicer and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to Special Underwriting and Residential Finance Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-BC1, Pool 1407
I, Ken Frye, Senior Vice President, Loan Servicing of Wilshire Credit Corporation (the "Servicer"), hereby certify that:
i.

A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of the
performance of the Servicer under this Agreement has been made under my supervision, and
ii.

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such year or a portion thereof, or if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, I have specified below each such failure known to me and the nature and status thereof.
Wilshire Credit Corporation, as Servicer
By: _/s/_Ken Frye_______________
Name: Ken Frye Title: Senior Vice President Loan Servicing
EXHIBIT 35.1

[BNY Mellon   Letterhead]

Statement of
Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.

I, James Hall, Vice President
of The Bank of New York Mellon, a New York corporation (the Trustee), states:

(a)
A review of the Trustees activities for the period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 (the
Reporting Period) and of the Trustees performance under the PPLUS Trust Certificates Series RRD-1 by and
between Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc. (the Depositor) and the Trustee has been made under my supervision.

(b)
To the best of my knowledge and based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period for PPLUS Trust Certificates Series RRD-1.

|                     | The Bank of New York Mellon,  
      as Trustee            
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                     |                                                            
|Date:
March 3,  2020 | /s/ James Hall
      
      James Hall
      Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

# AGENCY:

Department of Transportation.

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Availability of FY 2016 Service Contract Inventory.

In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, Public Law 111-117, Department of Transportation is publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of the FY 2016 Government-wide Service Contact Inventory data, the analysis of the FY 2015 Service Contract Inventory data and the plan for analyzing the FY 2016 data. This inventory provides information on service contract actions over $25,000 awarded in FY 2016. The information is organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed throughout the agency.

                    The inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance issued on November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at                     *http://www.whitehouse.gov/​sites/​default...052010.pdf.*                     Department of Transportation has posted its analysis of the FY 2015 Service Contact Inventory                           ( print page 51472)                        data, the plan for analyzing the FY 2016 data, and the link to the FY 2016 Government-wide inventory on the Department of Transportation's homepage at the following link:                     *https://www.transportation.gov/​assistant-secretary-administration/​procurement/​service-contract-inventory.*                     Questions regarding the Service Contract Inventory should be directed to Diane Morrison in the Office of the Senior Procurement Executive at 202-366-4960 or                     *diane.morrison@dot.gov.*

Dated: October 3, 2017.

Gregory Cate, 

Deputy Director, Office of Senior Procurement Executive.

[FR Doc. 2017-24077 Filed 11-3-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"AUGUST 2021 ACTIVITY REPORT","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"o8jt9MIncS\"><a href=\"\/august-2021-activity-report\/\">AUGUST 2021 ACTIVITY REPORT<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/august-2021-activity-report\/embed\/#?secret=o8jt9MIncS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“AUGUST 2021 ACTIVITY REPORT” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"o8jt9MIncS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Agile Software Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Carolyn V. Aver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|                        |  |                                        
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: September 8, 2004 |  | /s/ Carolyn V. Aver                    
|                        |  | Carolyn V. Aver Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Extends Comment Period for OTI Rules","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ygi2zNSrRc\"><a href=\"\/commission-extends-comment-period-for-oti-rules\/\">Commission Extends Comment Period for OTI Rules<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-extends-comment-period-for-oti-rules\/embed\/#?secret=Ygi2zNSrRc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Extends Comment Period for OTI Rules” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"Ygi2zNSrRc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}