alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Freestone Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  July 16, 2007



/s/ James F. Carroll

Name: James F. Carroll

Title:  Chief Executive Officer







Dated:  July 16, 2007



/s/ James F. Carroll

Name: James F. Carroll

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Contact Us","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vZIewAhalH\"><a href=\"\/contact\/\">Contact Us<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/contact\/embed\/#?secret=vZIewAhalH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Contact Us” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"vZIewAhalH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Compromise Agreements Recover $503,000 in Penalties","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UtzMCJej4J\"><a href=\"\/compromise-agreements-recover-503000-in-penalties\/\">Compromise Agreements Recover $503,000 in Penalties<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/compromise-agreements-recover-503000-in-penalties\/embed\/#?secret=UtzMCJej4J\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Compromise Agreements Recover $503,000 in Penalties” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"UtzMCJej4J\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Huiheng Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  April 15, 2011By:
/s/ Richard ShenName:  Richard ShenTitle:  Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>




                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            I, Alvin Siegel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Evolve One, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Evolve One, Inc.

July 31, 2006
                                     By: /s/ Alvin Siegel
                                         Alvin Siegel,
                                         President, principal executive officer,
                                         and principal accounting and
                                         financial officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Evolve One, Inc. and will be retained by Evolve One, Inc. and
furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.]
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2021 ND 234

Laura Kay Heggem, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Terje Gunnar Heggem, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20210212

Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, 

the Honorable Mark T. Blumer, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Amy M. Clark, Wahpeton, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Erica L. Chisholm, Wahpeton, ND, for defendant and appellant.

FILED 

IN THE OFFICE OF THE 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

DECEMBER 23, 2021 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1

Heggem v. Heggem

No. 20210212

Per curiam.

[¶1] Terje Heggem appeals from a district court order denying his motions to 

modify residential responsibility, for interim relief and to enforce the judgment. 

We summarily affirm.

[¶2] Terje Heggem and Laura Heggem divorced in 2015, and Laura Heggem 

was awarded primary residential responsibility of the parties’ child. In 

February 2021, Terje Heggem moved to modify residential responsibility, for 

interim relief and to enforce the divorce judgment. He claimed that since the 

original judgment, a material change in circumstances occurred when Laura 

Heggem and the child moved from Breckenridge, MN, to Frazee, MN, to live 

with Laura Heggem’s fiancé. Terje Heggem argued the move was not in the 

child’s best interests.

[¶3] The district court denied Terje Heggem’s motions without a hearing, 

concluding he had not established a prima facie case. The court determined a 

material change in circumstances did not occur because the stipulated divorce 

judgment allowed Laura Heggem to relocate within Minnesota with the child.

The court also determined Terje Heggem failed to demonstrate how Laura 

Heggem’s new relationship adversely affected the child.

[¶4] To establish a prima facie case justifying a modification of primary 

residential responsibility, a movant must show there has been a material 

change in circumstances and “the change in circumstances has adversely

affected the children.” Klundt v. Benjamin, 2021 ND 149, ¶ 8, 963 N.W.2d 278; 

Johnshoy v. Johnshoy, 2021 ND 108, ¶ 9, 961 N.W.2d 282. In Klundt, at ¶ 12,

the movant did not establish a prima facie case because she failed to show how 

a modification was necessary to serve the best interests of the child. See also

Johnshoy, at ¶¶ 13-14. Terje Heggem has not shown how a change in

residential responsibility is necessary to serve the best interests of the child 

and has failed to establish a prima facie case for modification of primary 

residential responsibility. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).
2

[¶5] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte
Exhibit 10.15


 


解除协议


Termination Agreement


 


甲方:股东


 


Party A: Shareholder(股东)


 


身份证号码:


 


ID card No:


 


乙方:北京量画科技有限公司


 


Party B: Beijing Lianghua Technology Co., Limited


 


地址:北京市顺义区中关村科技园区顺义园临空二路1号


 


Address: No.1 Linkong Er Road, Zhongguan Science
and Technology Park, Shunyi District, Beijing City, China


 


丙方:有家有保(北京)科技有限公司


 


Party C: Youjiayoubao (Beijing) Technology Limited


 


地址:北京市顺义区中关村科技园区顺义园临空二路1号


 


Address: No.1 Linkong Er Road, Zhongguan Science
and Technology Park, Shunyi District, Beijing City, China


 


鉴于:


 


Whereas:


 


甲方已在乙方的通知下,将甲方在丙方的股份全部转让给乙方,各方协议如下:


 


Party A has transferred all of Party A's shares
in Party C to Party B upon Party B's notice, and all parties agree as follows.







 


1、各方于 年 月
日签订的《股东表决权委托协议》、《股权处分协议》、《股权质押协议》,因甲方已经完成自己的义务,各方确定签订本协议之日起终止。


 


1. The Shareholder Voting Proxy Agreement, Exclusive Call Option Agreement
and Equity Pledge Agreement signed by the parties on [date] shall be terminated from the date when the parties determine to sign this
Agreement because Party A has completed its obligations.


 


2、各方对合同期内的权利义务无异议,亦无纠纷。


 


2. All parties have no objection or any disputes over the rights and
obligations during the contract period.


 


3、本协议自双方签署盖章之日起生效。


 


3. This Agreement shall come into force upon being
signed or sealed by both parties.


 


4、本协议以中文为准,
如中英文有异议的,以中文为准。


 


4. This Agreement shall prevail in Chinese. If
there is any objection in Chinese and English, the Chinese language shall prevail.


 


	甲方:	时间:
	Party A:	Date:
	 	 
	乙方:	时间:
	Party B:	Date:
	 	 
	丙方:	时间:
	Party C:	Date:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24
- 6029

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ROY LEE DYKES , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Big Stone Gap

. J ames P. Jones, Senior District Judge. ( 2:18

- cr - 00003

- JPJ

- PMS

- 1 )

Submitted : June 25, 2024 Decided: June 27, 2024

Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Roy Lee Dykes , Appellant Pro Se. Whitney Demain Pierce , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Abingdon , Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6029 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/27/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Roy Lee Dykes appeals the district court’s order denying his sixth motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors weighed against Dykes’ release

. See United States v. Malone , 57 F.4th 167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we grant Dykes’ motion to supplement his informal brief, and we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. Dykes , No. 2 :1 8

- cr - 00003

- JPJ

- PMS

- 1 ( W.D. Va. Dec. 27, 2023 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 24-6029 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/27/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 26, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21A0783. KEVIN MASSENGALE v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On January 13, 2021, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than January 22, 2021. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a). Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from that order.Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 26, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John DOTSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-14492

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 6, 2008.

Robert G. Davies, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, E. Bryan Wilson, Tallahassee, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Chet Kaufman, Randolph P. Murrell, Federal Public Defender, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DUBINA, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Randolph Murrell and Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for John Dotson in this direct criminal appeal, have moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels’ assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to "withdraw is GRANTED, and Dotson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventiv Health, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John R. Emery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
 
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  ****Date: November 13, 2003
By:
/s/ John R. EmeryTitle Chief Financial Officer
 
  
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ventiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by Ventiv Health, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 290 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to render an individual, who transfers 

certain educational assistance, to which the individual is entitled because 

of an agreement by such individual to serve in the Armed Forces, 

to a dependent of that individual, and who fails to complete such agreement, solely liable for the overpayment of such educational assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2021 

Mr. BOST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to render an individual, who transfers certain educational assistance, to 

which the individual is entitled because of an agreement 

by such individual to serve in the Armed Forces, to 

a dependent of that individual, and who fails to complete 

such agreement, solely liable for the overpayment of such 

educational assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 290 IH

1 SECTION 1. SOLE LIABILITY FOR TRANSFERRED EDU2 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE BY AN INDIVIDUAL 

3 WHO FAILS TO COMPLETE A SERVICE AGREE4 MENT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (i) of section 3319 of 

6 title 38, United States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘In the event’’ and insert9 ing ‘‘Subject to paragraph (2), in the event’’; 

10 and 

11 (B) by inserting ‘‘of this title’’ after ‘‘sec12 tion 3685’’; 

13 (2) in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2)— 

14 (A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘IN GEN15 ERAL’’ and inserting ‘‘SOLE LIABILITY’’; and 

16 (B) by inserting ‘‘for which the individual 

17 shall be solely liable to the United States for 

18 the amount of the overpayment for purposes of 

19 section 3685 of this title’’ before the period at 

20 the end; and 

21 (3) in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2)— 

22 (A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by 

23 striking ‘‘Subparagraph (A) shall not apply’’ 

24 and inserting ‘‘Neither the individual nor the 

25 dependent shall be liable to the United States 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 290 IH

1 for the amount of the overpayment for purposes 

2 of section 3685 of this title’’; and 

3 (B) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘of this 

4 title’’ after ‘‘section 3311(c)(4)’’. 

5 (b) REVERSION.—Effective October 1, 2026, such 

6 subsection (i) is amended to read as it read on the day 

7 before the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Collects $520,000 in Penalty Payments","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"V3AMzaNa9i\"><a href=\"\/fmc-collects-520000-in-penalty-payments\/\">FMC Collects $520,000 in Penalty Payments<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-collects-520000-in-penalty-payments\/embed\/#?secret=V3AMzaNa9i\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Collects $520,000 in Penalty Payments” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"V3AMzaNa9i\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}