alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAmended Annual Report of SkyPostal Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/Afor the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Albert Hernandez,acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany and I, Clement Harary, acting in the capacity as the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Albert Hernandez |                                   |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                 | Albert Hernandez                       |   |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer  and President |   |
|                 | October 2, 2008                   |   |
|                 |                                   |   |
| /s/ Clement Harary   |                                   |
|                 | Clement Harary                         |   |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer                |   |
|                 | October 2, 2008                   |   |

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Meeting Scheduled for November 8, 2017","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ISfHnX03f6\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-november-8-2017\/\">Commission Meeting Scheduled for November 8, 2017<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-november-8-2017\/embed\/#?secret=ISfHnX03f6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Scheduled for November 8, 2017” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ISfHnX03f6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Carl Savoy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/csavoy\/","title":"FMC Chairman Addresses Export Container Availability","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"R426LdbNvO\"><a href=\"\/fmc-chairman-addresses-export-container-availability\/\">FMC Chairman Addresses Export Container Availability<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-chairman-addresses-export-container-availability\/embed\/#?secret=R426LdbNvO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Chairman Addresses Export Container Availability” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"R426LdbNvO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
OrgNo Organization Name Reason for Action LICNUM Termination Date

026883 AEROSTAR GLOBAL LOGISTICS, LLC Failure to maintain a bond 026883NF 6/15/2020

027550 AROCEANO INC. Failure to maintain a bond 027550N 5/30/2020

026616 BROADVIEW CARGO SOLUTIONS LLC Voluntary Surrender 026616F 6/2/2020

025495 BST INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS INC Voluntary Surrender 025495N 5/21/2020

027182 CROWN LINE AMERICA, INC. Failure to maintain a bond 016293F 6/11/2020

015886 EMPIRE SHIPPING COMPANY, INC. Failure to maintain a bond 004610F 5/27/2020

017234 EVER‐SWIFT WORLDWIDE INC. Voluntary Surrender 017234NF 6/8/2020

020723 GABI INVESTMENTS AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION Failure to maintain a bond 020723N 6/3/2020

017810 GEP INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT FORWARDER, INC. Failure to maintain a bond 004339N 5/28/2020

015766 H&S INTERNATIONAL, INC. Failure to maintain a bond 004120NF 5/30/2020

021164 KARDEL ENTERPRISES, INC. Failure to maintain a bond 021164N 6/17/2020

008587 KYUNG LEE Failure to maintain a bond 008587N 6/14/2020

017496 LOAD GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. Failure to maintain a bond 017496N 6/17/2020

027676 MORO FREIGHT INTERNATIONAL INC Voluntary Surrender 027676F 5/27/2020

014838 NANCY LEE Failure to maintain a bond 004354F 6/1/2020

018582 OTS GLOBAL LOGISTICS (MIA), INC. Voluntary Surrender 018582N 5/30/2020

020747 PRIME LOGISTICS INT'L, INC. Voluntary Surrender 020747N 6/11/2020

027600 SEAHORSE EXPRESS INC. Voluntary Surrender 022930NF 6/2/2020

023547 SPRINT GLOBAL INC Failure to maintain a bond 023547F 5/22/2020

027738 U NEED SHIPPING INC Failure to maintain a bond 027738F 5/29/2020

024008 US PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. Failure to maintain a bond 024008N 6/14/2020

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations and Surrenders

June 2020
EX-4.14





 Exhibit 4.14 

ADDENDUM NO. 3 
 THIS AGREEMENT is
made this 2nd day of April 2022 by and between CAPITAL SHIP MANAGEMENT CORP. of Panama (the “CSM”) and CAPITAL PRODUCT PARTNERS L.P. of Marshall Islands (the
“CPLP”). 
 WHEREAS: 
 A. CPLP, whose
units are listed and trade on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, owns vessels and requires certain Information Technology (IT) Services; 
 B. Pursuant to the
IT Agreement dated 3rd day of April 2007, as amended (the “IT Agreement”), CPLP engaged CSM to provide such IT Services to CPLP, on the terms set out therein; 

C. The term of the IT Agreement expires on the 2nd day of April 2022 and the parties wish to extend and
continue this agreement for an additional five (5) years; 
 D. CPLP and CSM agree to extend the IT Agreement for an additional five (5) years and
to amend certain provisions of the IT Agreement, as set out herein. 
 NOW IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED as follows: 

1. The term of the IT Agreement is renewed for another five (5) years, namely from 3rd April
2022 to 2nd April 2027. 
 2. Words defined in the IT Agreement shall have the same meaning when
used in this addendum unless the context requires otherwise; 
 3. All other terms and conditions of the said IT Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties have executed this Agreement by their duly authorized signatories with effect on the date first above written.

  

			
	 CAPITAL PRODUCT PARTNERS L.P. BY ITS

GENERAL PARTNER, CAPITAL GP L.L.C.,

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Gerasimos Kalogiratos

		 	Name: Gerasimos Kalogiratos
		 	Title: Chief Executive Officer of Capital GP L.L.C.

  

			
	CAPITAL SHIP MANAGEMENT CORP.,
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Sarantos Petropouleas

		 	Name: Sarantos Petropouleas
		 	Title: Director/President


  
 1
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                         COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWHEQ, INC.
             CWHEQ REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2006-A
         REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET BACKED NOTES, SERIES 2006-A


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an
officer of Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (the "Master Servicer"), and does
hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Sale and Servicing
Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                              Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
#### Keith Delaun HINTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Matthew DODD, CO/Sec. Div. Badge # 135, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-6540.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 29, 2010.

Keith Delaun Hinton, Appellant Pro Se.

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Delaun Hinton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Hinton v. Dodd,*No. l:10-cv-00164-GLB-TRJ (E.D.Va. Mar. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6046

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

YAHYA WATSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:07-cr-00396-CMH-1; 1:13-cv-01162-CMH)

Submitted: March 25, 2014 Decided: March 28, 2014

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yahya Watson, Appellant Pro Se. David Sang Hak Lee, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Yahya Watson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as successive 

and unauthorized. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Watson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Table of Contents
 Exhibit 13.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES‐OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of TAM S.A. (the "Company") on Form 20‐F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, as amended by this Amendment No. 2 (the "Report"), I, Marco Antonio Bologna, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (i)          the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  June 8, 2010 By:/s/ Marco Antonio BolognaMarco Antonio Bologna
Chief Executive Officer


---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Damion Harlan COLCLOUGH, a/k/a Richard Jackson, a/k/a Omar House, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 09-5108.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 2, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 18, 2010.

Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Rodolfo Cejas, II, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Caroline S. Platt, Research and Writing Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Sherrie S. Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*751PER CURIAM:

Damion Harlan Colclough appeals the district court’s imposition of a twenty-four-month sentence following the revocation of his term of supervised release. On appeal, Colclough contends that, based on the facts of his case, the district court imposed a plainly unreasonable sentence upon revocation. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

The district court has broad discretion to impose a sentence upon revoking a defendant’s supervised release. *United States v. Thompson,*595 F.3d 544, 547 (4th Cir.2010). We will affirm unless the sentence is “plainly unreasonable” in light of the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006) factors. *United States v. Crudup,*461 F.3d 433, 437 (4th Cir.2006).

Our first step is to decide whether the sentence is unreasonable. *Id.*at 438. In doing so, we generally follow “the procedural and substantive considerations” employed in reviewing original sentences. *Id.*A sentence is procedurally reasonable if the district court has considered the policy statements contained in Chapter 7 of the *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*and the applicable § 3553(a) factors, *id.*at 439, and has adequately explained the sentence chosen, though it need not explain the sentence in as much detail as when imposing the original sentence. *Thompson,*595 F.3d at 547. A sentence is substantively reasonable if the district court states a proper basis for its imposition of a sentence up to the statutory maximum. *Crudup,*461 F.3d at 440. If, after considering the above, we determine that the sentence is not unreasonable, we will affirm. *Id.*at 439.

Our review of the record on appeal leads us to conclude that the district court’s sentence is procedurally and substantively reasonable. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer  of Legacy Wine & Spirits International, Ltd. (the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended September 30, 2010  (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 18, 2010

/s/Jaclyn Cruz

Jaclyn Cruz

President and a Director
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 0944 V

UNPUBLISHED

LEANNE ROTH

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: October 28, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Bridget Candace McCullough, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA , for petitioner.

Mallori Browne Openchowski , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for

respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On June 28, 2019

, Leanne Roth filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administrat ion (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on

October 20, 2017 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of

the Office of Special Masters.

On October 23, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, R espondent “believes that [P]etitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identif y and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public acces s.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

(2012 ).2

SIRVA, as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table ”

. Id. at 4 . Respondent further agrees that

Petitioner suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months

. Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ricky Lee Stroble

, * From the 259 th District

Court of Jones County,

Trial Court No. 023588

.

Vs. No. 11

- 16

- 00007

- CV * August 25 , 2016

Crystal Reyes and Warden Webb

, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that

t here is no error in the orders below. Therefore, in accordance with this

cour t ’ s opinion, the orders of the trial court are in all things affirmed.
#### Antonio COLBERT, Appellant v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Appellee.

No. 1:10-cv-01399-UNA.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Dec. 2, 2010.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed August 19, 2010, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint without prejudice on the ground that it did not meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). *See Ciralsky v. CIA,*355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). To comply with the rule, a complaint should identify the “circumstances, occurrences, and events” that support the claim for relief. *Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,*550 U.S. 544, 556 n. 3, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citation omitted).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.