alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
Pursuant to the engine sale agreement dated January 19, 2022 between FINNAIR AIRCRAFT FINANCE OY (“Seller”) and CONTRAIL AVIATION SUPPORT, LLC (“Buyer”) relating to two (2) used CFM56-5B3/2P engines bearing manufacturer’s serial numbers 779476 and 779945 (“Sale Agreement”) Buyer HEREBY UNCONDITIONALLY AND IRREVOCABLY CERTIFIES to Seller that:


1    Buyer did on the 12th day of April, 2022 inspect the Engines at Larnaca International Airport (LCA), Cyprus and Buyer confirms that the Engines conform with the description and are in the condition and equipped as required by the terms of the Sale Agreement;
2    Buyer hereby unconditionally and irrevocably accepts the Engines in an “AS IS WHERE IS” condition with all faults and defects (whether or not discoverable by inspection) and the provisions of Clause 8 of the Sale Agreement are repeated as if set out in full herein; and 
3    the condition of the Engines is satisfactory and compliant with the terms of the Sale Agreement in all respects, without reservation or exception, and Buyer has no rights or claims whatsoever against Seller in respect of the condition of the Engines or any of the other matters referred to in Clause 8 of the Sale Agreement.
Capitalised terms in this Acceptance Certificate but not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning as used in the Sale Agreement.
Date:     __April 13,2022______________
By:    __/s/ Joseph G. Kuhn__________
Title:    _CEO ______________________
Duly authorised, for and on behalf of
CONTRAIL AVIATION SUPPORT, LLC
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 51629)    
The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than November 21, 2017.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta*                     (Kathryn Haney, Director of Applications) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *Applications.Comments@atl.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *Gaylon M. Lawrence, Nashville, Tennessee;*                     to retain 10 percent or more of the outstanding voting shares of CapStar Financial Holdings, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of CapStar Bank, both in Nashville, Tennessee.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 1, 2017.

Ann E. Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2017-24210 Filed 11-6-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone McNEIL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7068.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided Nov. 25, 2013.

Tyrone McNeil, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*205PER CURIAM:

Tyrone McNeil seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion. McNeil also seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s denial of the motion to amend his § 2255 motion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McNeil has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### Keith V. HARNED, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Sara REVELL, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 10-7150.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 2, 2010.

Keith V. Harned, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith V. Harned, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Harned v. Revell,*No. 5:09-hc-02129-FL, 2010 WL 2680008 (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baynon International Corporation on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Pasquale Catizone, President (principal executive officer) and Daniel Generelli,
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                           /s/ Pasquale Catizone
                          -----------------------------------------------------
                          Pasquale Catizone
                          President (Principal Executive Officer)


                           /s/ Daniel Generelli
                          -----------------------------------------------------
                          Daniel Generelli
                          Chief Financial Officer
                          (Principal Financial Officer)

August 18, 2004
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > About > Strategies, Budgets, Plans, and Reports > Strategic Plans

Strategic Plans 2022



FMC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2022-2026 (updated March 28, 2022) [PDF, 123 KB]



Proposed FMC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2022-2026 [PDF, 123 KB]







2018



FMC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2018-2022 [PDF]







2017



Draft for Comment – FMC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2018-2022 [PDF, 1796 KB]



FMC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2014-2018 [PDF, 564 KB]







2014



FMC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2014-2018  [PDF, 223 KB]



FMC Information Resources Management Strategic Plan[PDF, 170 KB]







2013



Draft for Comment – FMC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2014-2018 [PDF, 174 KB]







2011



FMC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2010-2015 [PDF, 458 KB]







2008



FMC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2010-2015 [PDF, 3.8 MB]







2003



FMC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2003-2008







2000



FMC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2000-2005







1999



FMC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 1999-2000 Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Luis SOSA-URAGA, a/k/a Juan Guiteres, a/k/a Juan Guiterres, a/k/a Juan Gutierrez, a/k/a Luis Rey Sosa-Vraga, a/k/a Daniel Santos, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-2096-cr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 3, 2011.

David A. Lewis, Federal Defenders of New York, Inc., Appeals Bureau, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.

James J. Pastore, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney (Katherine Polk Failla, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), for Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: WALKER, B.D. PARKER, DENNY CHIN, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Defendant-appellant Luis Sosa-Uraga appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered May 21, 2010, convicting him of illegal reentry into the United States subsequent to a conviction for commission of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). The district court sentenced Sosa-Uraga principally to a term of 46 months’ imprisonment and three years’ supervised release. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and record *110of prior proceedings, which we reference only as necessary to explain our decision to affirm.

We review a district court’s sentence for procedural and substantive reasonableness. *United States v. Cavera,*550 F.3d 180, 189 (2d Cir.2008) (en banc). Sosa-Uraga challenges the reasonableness of his sentence, arguing that the district court failed to adequately explain its reasons for imposing its sentence. He acknowledges, however, that his counsel did not object at the close of sentencing to the statement of reasons that the court provided.

The record reflects that the district court gave detailed reasons supporting the sentence it imposed. We conclude that the sentence was procedurally and substantively reasonable, and that the district court committed no error, much less plain error. *See United States v. Marcus,*— U.S.-,-, 130 S.Ct. 2159, 2164, 176 L.Ed.2d 1012 (2010). The district court acted well within its “considerable sentencing discretion.” *United States v. Jones,*531 F.3d 163,174 (2d Cir.2008).

We have considered all of Sosa-Uraga’s other contentions on appeal and have found them to be without merit. Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40976 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE DE JESUS BAENA-AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-115-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose De Jesus Baena-Aguilar (Baena) appeals his illegal reentry conviction, challenging the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1), (2). Baena’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Baena contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected suchNo. 05-40976 -2- arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Baena properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

818 KA 14-01735 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RANDOLPH HARRIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MATTHEW B. POWERS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah A. Haendiges, J.), entered July 2, 2014. The judgment revoked defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.

Same memorandum as in People v Harris ([appeal No. 4] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 3, 2017]).

Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Form of Series B 3% Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate


 Exhibit 4.1 
  

					
	Number PB-                        	 	CELL THERAPEUTICS, INC.	 	*                                * Shares
		 	A Washington Corporation	 	Series B Preferred Stock

 THIS CERTIFIES THAT
*                            * is the record holder of
*                            *
(                                ) shares of Series B Preferred Stock of Cell
Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Corporation”) transferable only on the share register of the Corporation by the holder, in person or by such holder’s duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed or
assigned. 
 This certificate and the shares represented hereby shall be held subject to all of the provisions of the Articles of
Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation and any amendments thereto, a copy of each of which is on file at the office of the Corporation and made a part hereof as fully as though the provisions of said Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
were imprinted in full on this Certificate, to all of which the holder of this Certificate, by acceptance hereof, assents and agrees to be bound. 
 The shares represented by this Certificate are convertible into shares of Common Stock as set forth in the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation and shall be so converted upon the occurrence of certain events as set forth in said
Articles of Incorporation. 
 The Corporation will furnish without charge to each shareholder who so requests, the powers, designations,
preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences or rights. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this
                    , 2007. 
  

					
	  
	 		 	  

	 Donald W. Wyatt, Secretary
	 		 	Louis A. Bianco, Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration







 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY SELLS, ASSIGNS AND TRANSFERS UNTO
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                        
SHARES REPRESENTED BY THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE AND DOES HEREBY IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT
                                        
                     ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES ON THE SHARE REGISTER OF THE WITHIN NAMED CORPORATION WITH FULL POWER OF SUBSTITUTION IN
THE PREMISES. 
 DATED
                                     
  

			
		 	  

		 	(Signature)

 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS
CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael Strauss, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Home
      Mortgage Holdings, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
      and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5.    The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.


         /s/ Michael Strauss
----------------------------------------
Michael Strauss
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventiv Health, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eran Broshy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

| | (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and   
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                          
| | (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ ERAN BROSHY                    
| | -----------------------------------
| |                                    
| | Eran Broshy Chief Executive Officer
| |                                    

August 13, 2003

| | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ventiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by Ventiv Health, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------