alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OrgNo OrgName Reason for Action Terminatio

029634 ARC WORLDWIDE LIMITED Failure to a maintain bond 7/3/202

029777 BEIJING HENGRI HUICHANG INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT FORWARDING CO.,LTD.QINGDAO BRANCH Failure to maintain a bond 7/20/20

027945 BOXCOWORLD LOGISTICS INDIA PVT LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/8/202

029414 C&C GLOBAL LOGISTICS CO., LIMITED Failure to maintain a bond 7/8/202

029587 DEK INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS (NINGBO) CO., LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/14/20

029716 DELIVER IDEALS GLOBAL LOGISTICS CO., LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/29/20

028476 ETG LOGISTICS LIMITED Failure to maintain a bond 7/22/20

029526 EVER TOP (XIAMEN) INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS CO.,LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/5/202

029514 GARDNER EXPRESS (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 7/14/20

029466 GLORY SPRING PTE. LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 7/30/20

029464 JIANGSU KINGSHIP INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT CO., LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/21/20

023539 LAF ASIA INTERNATIONAL LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 7/1/202

029647 NINGBO CHAIN-CITY SHIPPING CO., LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/27/20

029527 NINGBO CLOUD POWER SUPPLY CHAIN CO., LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/8/202

029347 NINGBO D&X INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS CO., LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 7/8/202

022328 POWER EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 7/23/20

029612 QINGDAO QIANHAO INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS CO., LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/29/20

029650 SEA TANK SERVICE ASIA PTE. LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 7/23/20

027915 SHANDONG DOMINANT SOURCE GROUP CO., LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/9/202

027374 SHANGHAI HZD INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS CO., LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 7/18/20

026390 SHANGHAI LION STAR INTERNATIONAL FORWARDING CO., LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 7/23/20

029460 SHANGHAI OCEAN-BEST INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS CO.,LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 7/4/202

029584 SHENZHEN EVERGRANDE INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS CO., LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/21/20

029742 SHENZHEN GLITTLE SUPPLY CHAIN CO., LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/19/20

029490 SHENZHEN GOLDWIDE TECHNOLOGY LOGISTICS GROUP CO., LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/13/20

029558 SHENZHEN SPEED-UP INT'L LOGISTICS CO.,LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 7/31/20

029509 UNICARGO CHINA CO.,LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 7/9/202

030167 YIWU JIAYUN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT TRANSPORT AGENCY CO., LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/9/202

029725 ZHONGXIANG SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT (ZHEJIANG) CO., LTD Failure to maintain a bond 7/29/20

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations & Surrenders

July 1, 2022 to July 30, 2022
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Announcing the October 29, 2014 FMC Speaker Series Presentation","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SLqvLOvqee\"><a href=\"\/announcing-the-october-29-2014-fmc-speaker-series-presentation\/\">Announcing the October 29, 2014 FMC Speaker Series Presentation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/announcing-the-october-29-2014-fmc-speaker-series-presentation\/embed\/#?secret=SLqvLOvqee\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Announcing the October 29, 2014 FMC Speaker Series Presentation” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"SLqvLOvqee\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 5, 2010

p1102 

# Order

November 5, 2010

140784

AMERISURE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,Plaintiff/Counter-DefendantAppellant,

v SC: 140784 COA: 286677 Oakland CC: 2007-085003-CK HALL STEEL COMPANY,Defendant/Counter-PlaintiffAppellee,

and

CLEVELAND DIE AND MANUFACTURING, INC., Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipul ation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
Exhibit 32.1

OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Robert M. McMurrey, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report is in full compliance with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert M. McMurrey 
|Robert M. McMurrey     
|Chief Executive Officer
|January 16, 2009
#### UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Samuel CONYERS v. David N. MYERS, Supt.

Misc. No. 2947.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

May 24, 1965.

Samuel Conyers, in pro. per.

GRIM, Senior District Judge.

Relator, a state prisoner, alleges in this habeas corpus petition, that he has been denied the alleged constitutional right to have furnished to him at county expense the transcript of the testimony introduced at his state trial in 1963. It appears from relator’s petition that this is exactly the same allegation made by relator in a habeas corpus petition filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County and docketed as No. 150 of January Term, 1965. It further appears that this petition was denied on April 29, 1965 and that no appeal has been taken from that denial, although there is still ample time to appeal to the appellate courts of Pennsylvania. See P.L. 415, § 7, Act of May 25, 1951, 12 P.S. § 1907; P.L. 67, § 4, Act of May 19, 1897 as amended 12 P.S. § 1136.

Accordingly, the present petition must be denied for failure to exhaust presently available state remedies.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-85272,
33-94972, 333-87715, 333-39129, 333-41954, 333-54010, 333-59859, 333-63156, 333-100094, 333-113683, 333-119799, 333-128529,
and 333-130419) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-111527, 333-86072, and 333-120368) of Mattson
Technology, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2006, relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
   March 31, 2006

---
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Search Home > FTDO > Commissioner Sola Participates on Shore Power Panel at Seatrade Cruise Global 2024

Commissioner Sola Participates on Shore Power Panel at Seatrade Cruise Global 2024


Posted on:


April 23, 2024 5 panelists in white arm charges on a stage, Commissioner Sola is speakingCommissioner Louis E. Sola participated on the Power Up Your Shore Power Plan panel at Seatrade Cruise Global where he discussed the need for shore power support across the maritime industry.



Specifically, he highlighted the differences between Port of Mobile and PortMiami to demonstrate the challenges of shore power infrastructure. While PortMiami has successfully implemented shore power, smaller ports like Mobile require more support from industry leaders to drive sustainable solutions for the maritime industry. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, shore power can reduce NOx emissions at least 95% compared to traditional diesel generators.



The primary challenge in implementing shore power is securing government support and funding for enhanced port infrastructure. The Seatrade Cruise Global event provided a forum for industry experts to discuss potential economic resources and sustainable solutions for the maritime sector.



Commissioner Sola joined this panel alongside Ole Christian Fiskaa, Port Director, Port Authority of Alesund/Sula/Norway; David Matsuda, Principal, Matsuda & Associates; Mike Watts, Principal, Watts Marine; and Jan Swartz, Executive Vice President, Strategic Operations, Carnival Corporation. The panel took place on April 9, 2024, in Miami, FL.



5 panelists in white arm charges on a stage in front of a Seatrade Cruise Global backdropPanelists (L-R): Jan Swartz, Louis Sola, Ole Christian Fiskaa, David Matsuda, and Mike Watts*Louis E. Sola is a Commissioner with the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission. The thoughts and comments expressed here are his own and do not necessarily represent the position of the Commission.* Return to top



**FMC Information**



About the FMC



Employment Opportunities



Site Policies



FOIA



**Government Information**



Inspector General



U.S. Office of Special Counsel



Open Government at the FMC



USA.gov



Federal Maritime Commission


Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.



X

YouTube

LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2710 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2710

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To increase transparency with respect to financial services benefitting 
    state sponsors of terrorism, human rights abusers, and corrupt 
                   officials, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Banking Transparency for Sanctioned 
Persons Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON FINANCIAL SERVICES BENEFITTING STATE SPONSORS OF 
              TERRORISM, HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSERS, AND CORRUPT OFFICIALS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of 
the Treasury shall issue a report to the Committees on Financial 
Services and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the 
Committees on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and Foreign Relations 
of the Senate that includes a copy of any license issued by the 
Secretary in the preceding 180 days that authorizes a United States 
financial institution (as defined under section 561.309 of title 31, 
Code of Federal Regulations) to provide financial services 
benefitting--
            (1) a state sponsor of terrorism; or
            (2) a person sanctioned pursuant to any of the following:
                    (A) Section 404 of the Russia and Moldova Jackson-
                Vanik Repeal and Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law 
                Accountability Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-208).
                    (B) Subtitle F of title XII of the National Defense 
                Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114-
                328, the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability 
                Act).
                    (C) Executive Order No. 13818.
    (b) Form of Report.--The report required under subsection (a) shall 
be submitted in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex.

SEC. 3. SUNSET.

    The reporting requirement under this Act shall terminate on the 
date that is the end of the 7-year period beginning on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2710

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To increase transparency with respect to financial services benefitting 
    state sponsors of terrorism, human rights abusers, and corrupt 
                   officials, and for other purposes.
```
#### Roberto IFILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-1599.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 28, 2008.

Decided: May 12, 2008.

Francis H. Koh, Koh Law Firms, LLC, North Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Kevin J. Mikolashek, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roberto Ifill appeals the district court’s order granting the Postmaster General’s summary judgment motion on If ill’s hostile work environment and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Ifill v. Potter,*No. 1:06-cv-01393 (E.D.Va. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mack Arthur SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-31077

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 23, 2010.

*935Robert William Piedrahita, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John Harvey Craft, Esq., New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Mack Arthur Smith appeals his jury conviction for possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. He argues that the district court abused its discretion in admitting testimony that he sought to influence witnesses and to discourage them from providing testimony that inculpated him. Smith contends that the extrinsic evidence had little or no probative value and that the probative value was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. He also asserts that the extrinsic evidence should not have been admitted because the Government did not provide proper notice of its intent to use the evidence.

This court uses a two-step inquiry to analyze the admissibility of extrinsic evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b): (1) the extrinsic evidence must be relevant to an issue other than the defendant’s character, and (2) the evidence must possess probative value that is not substantially outweighed by its undue prejudice and must meet the other requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 403. *United States v. Mitchell,*484 F.3d 762, 774 (5th Cir.2007) (citing *United States v. Beechum,*582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978)). This court reviews the district court’s decision to admit the extrinsic evidence under a heightened abuse-of-discretion standard. *See Mitchell,*484 F.3d at 774. “Even if the district court abused its discretion in admitting the Rule 404(b) evidence, [this court] [does] not reverse if the error was harmless.” *Id.*(citations omitted).

Smith’s efforts to influence witnesses and to discourage them from testifying candidly were probative of his consciousness of guilt *(i.e.,*that the witnesses’ truthful testimony would likely result in his conviction). *See United States v. Rocha,*916 F.2d 219, 240-41 (5th Cir.1990). Because the evidence was probative of an issue other than Smith’s character, it was admissible under Rule 404(b). *See id.*at 241. And under the circumstances of this case, it was reasonable for the district court to find that the danger of unfair prejudice did not substantially outweigh the probative value of the evidence. *See*
      *936
      *id.*Thus, the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting extrinsic evidence concerning Smith’s attempts to influence witnesses. *See Rocha,*916 F.2d at 240-41. Even assuming the district court erred in admitting such evidence, that error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence supporting the jury’s finding of guilt. *See Mitchell,*484 F.3d at 774.

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencySharesSMCanadian Dollar Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joe Arruda, Chief Financial Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: January 14, 2010



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ JOE ARRUDA               
|Joe Arruda*                  
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is
a trust and Joe Arruda is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Alexander PERVYSHEV, Plaintiff—Appellant v. INC INTERORIENT NAVIGATION HAMBURG GMBH & CO. KG, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 07-20884

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 13, 2008.

Lawrence Blake Jones, Scheuermann & Jones, New Orleans, LA, Robert John Diliberto, Diliberto & Kirin, Meatirie, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

*322Robert L. Klawetter, Eastham, Watson, Dale & Forney, Houston, TX, David B. Lawton, Phelps Dunbar, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before STEWART, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Alexander Pervyshev, a Russian citizen, signed an employment contract in Russia with INC Hamburg, a German corporation. Pervyshev agreed to work aboard the M/V Candock III, and Hamburg flew Pervyshev to Houston, Texas to board the ship. Pervyshev was injured while cargo was being unloaded from the Candock while docked at Barranquilla, Columbia. A Columbian company was operating the crane offloading the cargo.

The district court dismissed Pervyshev’s claim on the basis that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over INC Hamburg. The district court, in its well stated Order and Judgment dated October 31, 2007, properly concluded that personal jurisdiction did not exist over INC Hamburg. We AFFIRM.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.