alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > Engagements > Chairman Maffei Addressing Cotton Shippers Association at Annual Convention

Chairman Maffei Addressing Cotton Shippers Association at Annual Convention


Posted on:


August 15, 2024 June 13, 2025 | Scottsdale, AZ



Chairman Daniel Maffei will address attendees of the 2024 American Cotton Shippers Association (ACSA) Annual Convention being held in Arizona June 13-15, 2025.  See the ACSA website for more information on agenda and costs to attend. Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc.
Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-WFHE1

Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest
Distributions to Certificateholders for 2006

Class      Interest            Principal            Realized           Ending
          Distribution            Paid               Losses            Balance

A1A       5,881,379.83       86,308,952.92           0.00        83,494,047.08
A1B       2,461,291.00                0.00           0.00        55,916,000.00
AlC       2,598,859.71                0.00           0.00        58,376,000.00
A1D       2,161,944.10                0.00           0.00        47,579,000.00
CE        5,605,675.98              397.19           0.00         7,201,370.18
M1          653,407.25                0.00           0.00        14,197,000.00
M10         238,498.06                0.00           0.00         3,498,000.00
M11         280,565.89                0.00           0.00         4,115,000.00
M2          598,734.75                0.00           0.00        12,962,000.00
M3          391,787.86                0.00           0.00         8,436,000.00
M4          301,589.45                0.00           0.00         6,379,000.00
M5          302,608.71                0.00           0.00         6,378,000.00
M6          257,413.10                0.00           0.00         5,350,000.00
M7          249,438.89                0.00           0.00         4,732,000.00
M8          144,362.73                0.00           0.00         2,675,000.00
M9          242,007.87                0.00           0.00         3,909,000.00
P         1,063,423.33                0.00           0.00               100.00
R                 0.00                0.00           0.00                 0.00
RX                0.00                0.00           0.00                 0.00
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

197 KA 11-02325 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
JASON B. OSGOOD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (ROBERT TUCKER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (JASON A. MACBRIDE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F. Kocher, J.), entered August 10, 2011. The judgment revoked defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: March 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-22-00207-CV 

 

DAVEON ELLIS, APPELLANT 

V. 

JACQUELINE TERRIAULT, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 264th District Court 

Bell County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 310173, Honorable Paul L. LePak, Presiding 

September 21, 2022 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Appellant, Daveon Ellis, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the trial 

court’s “findings, conclusions, or recommendations which were made by [the] Honorable 

Judge Paul Lepak on May 17, 2022.”1 We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the 

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. 
2

We have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a final judgment or from an 

interlocutory order made immediately appealable by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con 

Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352-53 (Tex. 

1998) (per curiam). The trial court clerk has notified the Court that no signed judgment 

or order has been filed. Moreover, the purported findings and recommendations of the 

trial court are not a final judgment, nor an interlocutory order made immediately 

appealable by statute. 

By letter of August 10, 2022, we notified Ellis that it did not appear that a final 

judgment or appealable order had been issued by the trial court and directed him to show 

how we have jurisdiction over this appeal. To date, Ellis has neither filed a response nor 

had any further communication with this Court.

Because Ellis has not presented this Court with a final judgment or appealable 

order, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

Per Curiam
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 207 (Friday, October 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23452]



[[Page 49802]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9035-8]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www2.epa.gov/nepa/ nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 10/16/2017 Through 10/20/2017
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-nepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20170208, Draft, FHWA, UT, State Route 30, S.R. 23 to 1000 
West, Comment Period Ends: 12/15/2017, Contact: Rod Terry 801-620-1686
EIS No. 20170209, Final, NOAA, MA, New England Fishery Management 
Council Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat Amendment 2, Review Period Ends: 
11/27/2017, Contact: Moira Kelly 978-281-9218
EIS No. 20170210, Final, USFWS, WY, Upper Green River Area Rangeland 
Project, Review Period Ends: 12/11/2017, Contact: Dave Booth (307) 367-
4326
EIS No. 20170211, Final, DOC, CT, Programmatic--Nationwide Public 
Safety Broadband Network for the Eastern United States, Review Period 
Ends: 11/27/2017, Contact: Amanda Pereira (571) 665-6072
EIS No. 20170212, Draft Supplement, BLM, CA, Palen Solar Project 
(formerly Palen Solar Power Project), Comment Period Ends: 12/11/2017, 
Contact: Mark DeMaio 760-833-7124

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20170164, Draft, USFS, CA, Exchequer Restoration Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 10/09/2017, Contact: Elaine Locke 559-855-5355

    Revision to FR Notice Published 08/25/2017; U.S. Forest Service is 
reopening the comment period to end 11/27/2017.

EIS No. 20170187, Draft, USACE, CA, Aliso Creek Mainstem Ecosystem 
Restoration Study, Environmental Impact Statement, Comment Period Ends: 
11/13/2017, Contact: Deborah Lamb (213) 452-3798

    Revision to FR Notice Published on 09/29/2017; Extending Comment 
Period from 11/13/2017 to 11/28/2017.

EIS No. 20170190, Draft, USACE, CA, Ballona Wetlands Restoration 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 11/24/2017, Contact: Daniel Swenson 213-
452-3414

    Revision to FR Notice Published on 10/06/2017; Extending Comment 
Period from 11/24/2017 to 02/05/2018.

    Dated: October 24, 2017.
Kelly Knight,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2017-23452 Filed 10-26-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Chairman Mario Cordero Nomination Hearing Testimony","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UeSVmSS677\"><a href=\"\/chairman-mario-cordero-nomination-hearing-testimony\/\">Chairman Mario Cordero Nomination Hearing Testimony<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/chairman-mario-cordero-nomination-hearing-testimony\/embed\/#?secret=UeSVmSS677\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Chairman Mario Cordero Nomination Hearing Testimony” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"UeSVmSS677\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Compromise Agreements Recover $350,000 in Penalties","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EeKIYKWROL\"><a href=\"\/compromise-agreements-recover-350000-in-penalties\/\">Compromise Agreements Recover $350,000 in Penalties<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/compromise-agreements-recover-350000-in-penalties\/embed\/#?secret=EeKIYKWROL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Compromise Agreements Recover $350,000 in Penalties” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"EeKIYKWROL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Carl Savoy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/csavoy\/","title":"Commission Meeting Rescheduled for May 3, 2023\u00a0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZhWb3aXjjd\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-rescheduled-for-may-3-2023\/\">Commission Meeting Rescheduled for May 3, 2023\u00a0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-rescheduled-for-may-3-2023\/embed\/#?secret=ZhWb3aXjjd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Rescheduled for May 3, 2023\u00a0” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ZhWb3aXjjd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
| Company Name                                                     |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation      |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
| Favor Sea (US) Inc.                                              |   | New York, United States of America |
| Favor Sea Limited                                                |   | British Virgin Islands             |
| Hong Kong Engineering Plastics Company Limited                   |   | Hong Kong                          |
| Harbin Xinda Macromolecule Material Co., Ltd.                    |   | People’s Republic of China   |
| Harbin Xinda Macromolecule Materials Research Center Co., Ltd.   |   | People’s Republic of China   |
| Harbin Xinda Macromolecule Material Engineering Center Co., Ltd. |   | People’s Republic of China   |
| Heilongjiang Xinda Software Development Co., Ltd.                |   | People’s Republic of China   |
#### Christy McGOWAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Earl Allen BOEK, individually and partner; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-16490.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 2, 2010.

Christy McGowan, Chandler, AZ, pro se.

*288Robert Sarett, Redding, CA, pro se.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Christy McGowan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing without prejudice her action alleging claims as the purported trustee for Wasasa Enterprises, an Arizona joint stock company. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Johns v. County of San Diego,*114 F.3d 874, 876 (9th Cir.1997), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action because McGowan, who is not a licensed attorney, may not pursue the action on behalf of Wasasa Enterprises. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1654; *Licht v. Am. W. Airlines (In re Am. W. Airlines),*40 F.3d 1058, 1059 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam) (“Corporations and other unincorporated associations must appear in court through an attorney.”); *United States v. High Country Broad. Co.,*3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir.1993) (per curiam) (in an action against a corporation that had not retained counsel, the corporation’s president and sole shareholder could not intervene pro se because it would circumvent the requirement that the corporation be represented by counsel).

McGowan’s subrogation argument is unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

JOYCELYN MCVOY, AMY MCVOY

SMITH, JONATHAN MCVOY AND

JARED MCVOY, INDIVIDUALLY

AND ON BEHALF OF JOHNNY RAY

MCVOY

VERSUS

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY

NO. 2022 CW 1201

NOVEMBER 18, 2022

In Re: Rimcor, Inc., applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

No. 682228. 

BEFORE: THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ. 

WRIT DISMISSED. Pursuant to the unopposed motion to dismiss

filed by relator representing that the matter has been resolved, 

this writ application is hereby dismissed. 

MRT

WRC

CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

1 tl tTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of TrimFast Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended as of March 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report")
the undersigned in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies that pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to his knowledge:

         1. The Registrant fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information
contained in this Report presents in al material respects, the financial
conditions and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:   March 12,  2004
/s/ Kenneth Hilowitz
Kenneth Hilowitz
Chief Financial Officer
TrimFast Group, Inc.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Roberto Ricardo MOLINA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-51501

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 2008.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Roberto Ricardo Molina-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 *338(5th Cir.2007), *cert. denied,*—- U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.