alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lisa MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SYBASE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-1883.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 15, 2008.

Decided: May 6, 2008.

Jeanett P. Henry, Henry & Maddox, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellant. Tyler A. Brown, Jackson Lewis LLP, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished Per Curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Miller appeals the district court’s order granting Sybase, Incorporated’s summary judgment motion on her race discrimination and retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Miller v. Sybase, Inc.,*No. 8:06-cv-01176-DKC (D.Md. Aug. 8, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT

I, Cameron King, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Quest Oil Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and,

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and,

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|      |                                                                      
|----- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:   | /S/
Cameron King

Cameron King

President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: | February 21, 2006
#### Fred Slater, Appellant-Respondent, v Margaret Slater, Respondent-Appellant. Ralph E. Gansell, Nonparty Respondent.

[665 NYS2d 943]

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated July 26, 1985, the plaintiff former husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), entered January 2, 1996, as awarded the defendant wife counsel fees in the sum of $7,000, and the defendant former wife cross-appeals from the same order.

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the nonparty respondent Ralph E. Gansell is awarded one bill of costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, considering the financial circumstances of the parties and the circumstances of the case as a whole, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in directing him to pay a portion of the defendant’s counsel fees *(see, DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete,*70 NY2d 879, 881; *Matter of O’Neil v O’Neil,*193 AD2d 16; *Hirsch v Hirsch,*142 AD2d 138, 146). Copertino, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Lerner, JJ., concur.
[No. 29930-9-III.

Division Three.

October 4, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Anthony Willett, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grant County, No. 10-1-00268-8, John D. Knodell III, J., entered May 17, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Brown, J. ,

concurred in by Sweeney and Kulik, JJ.
| 1.     | Such      Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                              |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year      ended December 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Standard      Mobile, Inc. |

| Date:      March 25, 2008                                            |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                 |
| Standard      Mobile, Inc.                                           |
|                                                                 |
| By:      /s/      Won Bum Lee                                        |
| Won      Bum LeeChief      Executive Officer, Chief FinancialOfficer |
## On this page

        - OTI License Applications            -  2024 
          - 2023 
          - 2022 
          - 2021  OTI License Revocations and Surrenders-  Current Revocations and Surrenders 
- Previous Updates 
   
This page contains notices on the status of Ocean Transportation Intermediary (OTI) licenses. OTI License applications filed with the FMC and any later revocations, suspensions, surrenders, will be listed here. 

This list may be used in combination with the List of FMC Licensed & Bonded OTIs. Notice: After 1/22/2020 you must refer to the OTI LIST to determine if a license has been reissued.
OTI License Applications2024-  February 26, 2024 
-  February 20, 2024 
-  February 12, 2024 
-  February 5, 2024 
-  January 29, 2024 
-  January 22, 2024 
-  January 16, 2024 
-  January 8, 2024 
Previous Page12342023-  July 3, 2023 
-  June 26, 2023 
-  June 20, 2023 
-  June 12, 2023 
-  June 5, 2023 
-  May 30, 2023 
-  May 22, 2023 
-  May 15, 2023 
Previous Page1234567Next Page2022-  July 5, 2022 
-  June 27, 2022 
-  June 21, 2022 
-  June 13, 2022 
-  June 6, 2022 
-  May 31, 2022 
-  May 23, 2022 
-  May 16, 2022 
Previous Page1234567Next Page2021-  June 28, 2021 
-  June 21, 2021 
-  June 14, 2021 
-  June 7, 2021 
-  June 1, 2021 
Previous Page1234OTI License Revocations and SurrendersCurrent Revocations and Surrenders- June 30, 2024  [PDF, 84 KB]
- May 31, 2024  [PDF, 78 KB]
- April 30, 2024  [PDF, 123 KB] 
- March 31, 2024  [PDF, 124 KB]
- February 29, 2024  [PDF, 121 KB]
- January 31, 2024  [PDF, 123 KB]
Previous Updates- Archived OTI License Revocations and Surrenders
    
Return to top
**FMC Information**
About the FMC

Employment Opportunities

Site Policies

FOIA
**Government Information**
Inspector General

U.S. Office of Special Counsel

Open Government at the FMC

USA.gov
Federal Maritime Commission
Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable****international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
- X
- YouTube
- LinkedIn

800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-4673

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ERIC HOGAN, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-98-77) Submitted: February 15, 2000 Decided: February 28, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryan Leslie Saunders, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Robert E. Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Eric Hogan was convicted for distributing cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994). He was subsequently sentenced to 130 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Hogan challenges the sufficiency of evidence to support the jury’s verdict. We have reviewed the record, and viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, we find sufficient evidence to support Hogan’s conviction. See Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). Accordingly, we affirm Hogan’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                          3,072,495
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,279,236
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (942,720)
<INVENTORY>                                       717,275
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                8,549,412
<PP&E>                                          5,423,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (317,281)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 42,911,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           7,704,856
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           45,545
<OTHER-SE>                                     32,790,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   42,911,677
<SALES>                                         3,565,763
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,457,617
<CGS>                                           2,208,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,208,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               17,000,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 67,037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,750,720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,750,720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,750,720)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.018)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.018)



</TABLE>
[No. 30224-5-III.

Division Three.

October 30, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Sara Christine Kortan, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Douglas County, No. 10-1-00093-7, John Hotchkiss, J., entered September 13, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Kulik, J.,

concurred in by Korsmo, C.J., and Brown, J.
Registering and Creating a User Profile 

using the FLRA’s eFiling System

FLRA eFiling System
From the home page of the FLRA’s website -- FLRA.gov -- click on the eFile link.
Click the link to enter the FLRA eFiling System.
To use the FLRA’s eFiling System, you must register and create a User Profile. 

To create a User Profile, click on the Not a registered user link.
First, enter your email address, name, and title. Your email address will be your 

Username for the FLRA eFiling System.
Enter the name of the organization you represent, such as Agency or Union, along 

with the Activity or Union Local. Then enter your mailing address and phone 

number.
Please select the FLRA office where you most frequently file cases. For example, if you more often file 

documents concerning exceptions to arbitration awards, negotiability appeals, exceptions to ALJ decisions in 

unfair labor practice (ULP) cases, or applications for review in representation cases, then select the 

Authority. If you most frequently file requests for assistance in resolving bargaining impasses, then select 

FSIP. And if you most frequently file ULP charges or representation petitions, then select the Office of the 

General Counsel Regional Office where you usually file your cases. Then click the Save button.
Next, you will receive an automated email message telling you that your User Profile has been 

received and is pending approval, which normally happens within one business day. The 

email message will also contain your FLRA eFiling password, which you will need whenever 

you use the eFiling System. Once your User Profile is approved, you will receive another 

automated email advising you that you may now file cases and documents using the FLRA’s 

eFiling System.
After your User Profile has been approved, you may begin eFiling cases. To start, 

click on the Already a registered user link.
Enter your Username (your email address) and the password you were given in 

the automated email you received. Then click the Login button.
After you log in, you will be taken to your eFiling Home Page, which has features 

to help you manage your eFiled FLRA cases. Use the Quick Links section to jump 

to the various sections of the Home Page.
The FLRA Approval Information section shows whether or not your User Profile is 

approved.
To file a case, click on one of the Add Case buttons. To file a request for assistance involving a 

negotiation impasse, click the Add FSIP Case button. To file a ULP charge or representation 

petition, click the Add OGC Case button. To file documents involving an arbitration 

exception, negotiability appeal, exceptions to a ULP decision, or application for review of a 

representation decision, click the Add Authority Case button.
After you begin eFiling cases, your cases will be listed as seen above, showing 

information on the status of your case, the assigned FLRA case number, and, if 

the case was filed, the filing date.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"C2uA0tfAwu\"><a href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/strategies-budgets-and-performance\/employment-surveys\/\">Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/about-the-fmc\/strategies-budgets-and-performance\/employment-surveys\/embed\/#?secret=C2uA0tfAwu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"C2uA0tfAwu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.2

DIGIMARC CORPORATION    CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Digimarc Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael McConnell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:
August 1, 2008

By:

/s/MICHAEL MCCONNELLMichael McConnell Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### ROSS V. *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 32668)

Alvord, Bear and Espinosa, Js.

Submitted on briefs February 3

officially released February 28, 2012

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Chris Hughey Named FMC General Counsel","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"g8we8bWxKl\"><a href=\"\/chris-hughey-named-fmc-general-counsel\/\">Chris Hughey Named FMC General Counsel<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/chris-hughey-named-fmc-general-counsel\/embed\/#?secret=g8we8bWxKl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Chris Hughey Named FMC General Counsel” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"g8we8bWxKl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}