alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7414

ONIEL BASIL HARRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CA-01-57-AM)

Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oniel Basil Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Shelly Renee James, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Oniel Basil Harris appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Harris v. Angelone, No. CA-01-57-AM

(E.D. Va. filed Jul. 31, 2001; entered Aug. 2, 2001). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3507 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3507

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in 
the rates of survivors' and dependents' educational assistance payable 
                 by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2009

 Mr. Paulsen (for himself and Mr. Walz) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in 
the rates of survivors' and dependents' educational assistance payable 
                 by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN RATES OF SURVIVORS' AND DEPENDENTS' EDUCATIONAL 
              ASSISTANCE.

    Section 3532 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1)--
                    (A) by striking ``$788'' and inserting ``$1098'';
                    (B) by striking ``$592'' and inserting ``$823''; 
                and
                    (C) by striking ``$394'' and inserting ``$547'';
            (2) in subsection (a)(2)(B), by striking ``$788'' and 
        inserting ``$1098'';
            (3) in subsection (b), by striking ``$788'' and inserting 
        ``$1098''; and
            (4) in subsection (c)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``$636'' and inserting ``$884'';
                    (B) by striking ``$447'' and inserting ``$663''; 
                and
                    (C) by striking ``$319'' and inserting ``$441''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
31.2


Certifications
pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act of 1934


Rule 13a-14
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002





I, Keith
D. Lowey, Chief Financial Officer of Organic Sales and Marketing,
Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of the Registrant;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:




a.      Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




b.      Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




c.
            Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and




5.  The
Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a.
            All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
  and




b.
            Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.




Date:
February 11,
2011


By:
                /s/Keith D.
      LoweyKeith
      D. Lowey, CPAChief
      Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Acting Chairman Khouri in London for US-UK Maritime Consultations","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PufzIClwtV\"><a href=\"\/acting-chairman-khouri-in-london-for-us-uk-maritime-consultations\/\">Acting Chairman Khouri in London for US-UK Maritime Consultations<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/acting-chairman-khouri-in-london-for-us-uk-maritime-consultations\/embed\/#?secret=PufzIClwtV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Acting Chairman Khouri in London for US-UK Maritime Consultations” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"PufzIClwtV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0564

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RYAN WILLIAM MCCAULEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 11, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 30 2020

03/30/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0564
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Eases Regulatory Burdens to Maritime Supply Chain Users","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xZswvDv6mO\"><a href=\"\/commission-eases-regulatory-burdens-to-maritime-supply-chain-users\/\">Commission Eases Regulatory Burdens to Maritime Supply Chain Users<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-eases-regulatory-burdens-to-maritime-supply-chain-users\/embed\/#?secret=xZswvDv6mO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Eases Regulatory Burdens to Maritime Supply Chain Users” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"xZswvDv6mO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

CONCURRING OPINION

No. 04-17-00099-CV

Victor RAMOS,

Appellant

v.

CITY OF LAREDO,

Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVT003985 D2

Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Concurring Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 28, 2018

I write separately to point out my concern about a potential unintended consequence of 

section 101.106(e) of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code (“the Code”). The take-nothing 

judgment entered in the underlying cause is the “untenable” result this court forecasted could occur 

in Franka v. Velasquez, 216 S.W.3d 409, 413 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2006), rev’d, 332 S.W.3d 

367 (Tex. 2011). A governmental entity should not be permitted to demand that its employee be 

dismissed from a lawsuit under section 101.106(e) of the Code and then, after the employee is 

dismissed from the lawsuit, attempt to assert immunity or otherwise avoid liability by arguing the 

employee was not within the course and scope of his employment. Fortunately, the City’s judicial 
Concurring Opinion 04-17-00099-CV

- 2 -

admission precludes it from capitalizing on that approach in this case. This case does, however, 

demonstrate the need for the Legislature to consider amending the statute to prevent what must be 

an unintended consequence. 

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Publishes Update of its Official Case Law Reporter","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Lyhi0iLctw\"><a href=\"\/commission-publishes-update-of-its-official-case-law-reporter-vol6\/\">Commission Publishes Update of its Official Case Law Reporter<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-publishes-update-of-its-official-case-law-reporter-vol6\/embed\/#?secret=Lyhi0iLctw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Publishes Update of its Official Case Law Reporter” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"Lyhi0iLctw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### U.S. HOME CORPORATION, Beechwood at Edison, LLC, and Beechwood Shopping Center, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2013-5059.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 15, 2014.

Brian Wolfson, The Weingarten Law Firm, LLC, of Piscataway, New Jersey, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. On the brief was Andrew D. Ullrich.

Kenneth D. Woodrow, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Deborah A. Bynum, Assistant Director.

LOURIE, PROST, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
SHELDON KRESLER
,
Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW
, Respondent s

.
___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1113

Opinion filed October 20, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

-- Original Jurisdiction

. Sheldon Kresler, pro se
, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Ta llahassee (no appearance); Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Barbara Debelius and Beverly Brewster , Assistant General Counsel s , Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee; and Sarah J. Rumph, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review , Tallahassee, for Respondent s

.

PER CURIAM.

The Department of Corrections’ motion to remand is treated as a confession of

error. The lower tribunal’s order rendered February 24, 2015, is QUASHED, and this

matter is hereby REMANDED for further proceeding s.

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner

v. RAMEEK HUDSON, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : No. 323 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 30th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
OrgNo Organization Name Reason For Action Termination Date

027486 EVERTOP SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT CO., LTD Failure to maintain a bond 10/24/2021

027145 ISHIPRORO INC. Voluntary surrender 10/12/2021

018704 LINK & LINK SHIPPING LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 10/29/2021

012713 PELORUS OCEAN LINE LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 10/8/2021

028258 SEASPACE INTERNATIONAL FORWARDERS LTD Failure to maintain a bond 10/8/2021

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Foreign Registered NVOCC Terminations & Surrenders

October 1, 2021  to October 31, 2021
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In connection with this Yearly Report of Magnegas Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dr. Ruggero Maria Santilli, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
   1. Such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Magnegas Corporation.
  Date: March 22, 2010
   /s/ Dr. Ruggero Maria Santilli
 Dr. Ruggero Maria Santilli
 Chief Executive Officer
#### Manpreet KAUR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-70225.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 2010.

Filed Nov. 16, 2010.

Inna Lipkin, Esquire, Law Offices of Inna Lipkin, Redwood City, CA, for Petitioner.

Remi Adalemo, Rachel Louise Browning, Blair O’Connor, Assistant Director, Ann M. Welhaf, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and WILKEN, District *239Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Claudia Wilken, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Manpreet Kaur appeals from a final removal order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her claims seeking asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention against Torture (“CAT”). Because we find that the IJ’s adverse credibility determination was supported by substantial evidence, we deny the petition for review.

We review adverse credibility determinations under the deferential substantial evidence standard of the REAL ID Act of 2005. *See Shrestha v. Holder,*590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir.2010). In making a credibility determination, the trier of fact should consider “the totality of the circumstances, and all relevant factors.” 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(iii).

Here, the BIA agreed with the IJ’s determination that Kaur’s credibility was undermined by inconsistencies between her application for asylum and her actual testimony. First, her application materials indicated that she was employed by a government high school between June 1994 and June 2002, but she then testified that she worked for a newspaper starting December 2000. She also testified that as part of her prior refugee application in Canada, she had provided articles about political corruption and election fraud in India, which she wrote. The Canadian Refugee Protection Division, however, observed that Kaur had not presented any such documents. Finally, the BIA noted that Kaur failed to provide corroborative documentation in response to the IJ’s request that she support the claim that she published articles relating to government or police corruption. Accordingly, we uphold the BIA’s affirmance of the IJ’s denial of Kaur’s petition on credibility grounds.

Because we deny the petition on credibility grounds, we need not address the IJ’s alternate holdings that Kaur would not be eligible for withholding of removal or protection under the Convention against Torture if she were found credible.

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.