alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to
Consulting Agreement (“Amendment”), dated April 27, 2022 and effective as of the same date, unless otherwise set
forth below, is entered into by and between 180 Life Sciences Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and
Lawrence Steinman (“Executive”) (collectively, the Company and Executive are the
“Parties”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and Executive have entered into a Consulting Agreement, dated November 17, 2021, and effective November 1, 2021 (the “Agreement”)1,
concerning the engagement of Executive as Co-Chairman of the Company;


 


WHEREAS, certain capitalized
terms used below have the meanings given to such terms in the Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties
wish to amend the Agreement to revise certain terms of the Agreement as set forth herein in order to reduce Company costs on a temporary
basis.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged
and confirmed, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


		1.	Effective March 1, 2022, the Salary is reduced by $56,250 (a 25% reduction) and such amounts (“Accrued
Amounts”) shall be accrued until such time as the Board of Directors determines to pay such Accrued Amounts, which the Company expects
will not be until it has raised a minimum of $15,000,000 (the “Funding Determination Date”); and



 


		2.	On the Funding Determination Date, the Accrued Amounts shall be paid by the Company.



 


		3.	Except to the extent modified hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



 


		4.	This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors and
assigns.



 


		5.	This Agreement and any signed agreement or instrument entered into in connection with this Agreement,
and any amendments hereto or thereto, may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Any such counterpart, to the extent delivered by means of a facsimile machine or by .pdf, .tif, .gif, .jpeg or similar attachment to electronic
mail (any such delivery, an “Electronic Delivery”) shall be treated in all manner and respects as an original executed
counterpart and shall be considered to have the same binding legal effect as if it were the original signed version thereof delivered
in person.



 





 









	1	https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001690080/000121390021060424/ea150938ex10-1_180lifesci.htm




 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have caused the Amendment to be executed as of the date and year first referenced above.


 


	The “Company”	180 Life Sciences Corp.
	 	 	 
	Date: April 27, 2022	By:  	/s/ Ozan Pamir
	 	Its:	CFO
	 	Printed

 Name: 	 

                                                                      Ozan Pamir

	 	 	 
	The “Executive”	 	 
	Date: April 15, 2022	By:  	/s/ Lawrence Steinman
	 	 	Lawrence Steinman
Federal Maritime Commission

Plain Writing Act of 2010 Compliance Report

September 29, 2015

Senior Agency Official for Plain Writing:

Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, secretary@fmc.gov, 202-523-5725

Plain Language Website address:

http://www.fmc.gov/about/plain_language_guidelines.aspx

Contact us: secretary@fmc.gov

Status of Agency Communications to be Made Available in a Format that is Consistent 

with the OMB Plain Writing Guidelines

Type of Communication, Document 

or Posting, and How it is Made 

Available to the Public

Intended User and Approximate 

Number of Potential Users

Status

Updates to website to improve user 

experience

• Entities regulated by the 

FMC - 6,000 users.

• Members of the public 

impacted by the 

regulatory requirements –

unknown number of 

users.

Metrics and user feedback were 

used to improve and generate 

better organized content based on 

user needs

Frequently used content was revised 

to better meet user expectations.

Redesign of FMC Annual Report to 

Congress

• Entities regulated by the 

FMC - 6,000 users.

• Members of the public 

impacted by the 

regulatory requirements –

unknown number of 

users.

Report structure was redesigned 

and content streamlined to more 

effectively highlight the activities 

and accomplishments of the 

Commission. 

Ongoing Compliance Activities

• Update forms in use for modern English and clarity

• Provide classroom training on Plain Language principles to document creators

• Repurpose FAQs as content pages

• Reorganize content to make user tasks easier to complete

• Provide improved print brochures and media to customers

• Translate high-impact content for Low English Proficiency users
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Carlton Parfitt, Chief Financial Officer of Legacy Mining Ltd.,  a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 of Legacy Mining Ltd.;



2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14 and 15d - 14) for the registrant and we have:



a.      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b.      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within September 30, 2006 prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c.      presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a.      All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: September 14, 2007



/s/ Carlton Parfitt

--------------

Carlton Parfitt

Director and Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Dye Announces Findings of San Pedro Bay Discussions – June 17, 2020","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wqmye6lg88\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-dye-announces-findings-of-san-pedro-bay-discussions\/\">Commissioner Dye Announces Findings of San Pedro Bay Discussions – June 17, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-dye-announces-findings-of-san-pedro-bay-discussions\/embed\/#?secret=wqmye6lg88\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Dye Announces Findings of San Pedro Bay Discussions – June 17, 2020” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"wqmye6lg88\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Open Government Feedback","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SvB6plmbam\"><a href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/open-government-feedback\/\">Open Government Feedback<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/about-the-fmc\/open-government-feedback\/embed\/#?secret=SvB6plmbam\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Open Government Feedback” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"SvB6plmbam\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10448.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 19, 2013.*

Filed Dec. 4, 2013.

Laurie K. Gray, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Barbara Valliere, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Walter K. Pyle, Berkeley, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Jose Jimenez, pro se.

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Jimenez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 87-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; and possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(viii). Pursuant to *850*Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Jimenez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Jimenez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Jimenez has waived his right to appeal his sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. *See United States v. Watson,*582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. *See id.*at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Shirley L. ALDRIDGE, Petitioner-Appellant v. Joe KEFFER, Warden, FMC-Carswell, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-10725

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 8, 2011.

Shirley L. Aldridge, Fort Worth, TX, pro se.

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Shirley L. Aldridge, federal prisoner # 17829-045, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging her incarceration resulting from her conviction for five counts of aiding and abetting the filing of false income tax returns. The district court dismissed Aldridge’s § 2241 petition, and this court dismissed Aldridge’s appeal from the dismissal of her § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction because Aldridge did not file a timely notice of appeal. *Aldridge v. Kef-fer,*No. 10-10725, slip op. at 1-2 (5th Cir. Oct. 6, 2010) (unpublished).

*426After dismissing Aldridge’s § 2241 petition, the district court denied Aldridge a certificate of appealability (COA). Al-dridge now appeals the district court’s order denying her a COA.

Aldridge argues that the district court erred by dismissing her § 2241 petition and denying her post-judgment motions. She does not, however, raise any challenges to the district court’s order denying her a COA. As this court has already dismissed Aldridge’s appeal from the dismissal of her § 2241 motion, the only matter presently before us is her appeal from the district court’s order denying her a COA. By failing to raise any challenge to the district court’s order denying her a COA, Aldridge has waived the only issue before this court. *See Hughes v. Johnson,*191 F.3d 607, 613 (5th Cir.1999). Furthermore, as a COA is not required to appeal the denial of a § 2241 petition and Al-dridge’s appeal from the dismissal of her § 2241 petition has already been dismissed, any possible error in the district court’s COA order would be harmless. *See Ojo v. INS,*106 F.3d 680, 681 (5th Cir.1997).

Aldridge’s appeal is without arguable merit. Accordingly, it is dismissed as frivolous. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2; *Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Phillip C. ScottPhillip                C. ScottChief                Financial Officer February                20, 2007 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Simex Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Kjell I. Jagelid Kjell I. Jagelid, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Date: November 20, 2007
EXHIBIT
31.1





CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION





I, Mike
Doran, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Freestone Resources,
Inc.





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.








Date: May
18, 2009







/s/ Mike
Doran





Mike
Doran


President
and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oliver Creek Resources Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended January 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Bruce
Thomson, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: April 16, 2008                By: /s/ Bruce Thomson
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Bruce Thomson
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.