alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

It is determined that the National Cancer Institute Board of Scientific Advisors is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the National Cancer Institute and National Institutes of Health by law, and that these duties can best be performed through the advice and counsel of this group.

In accordance with Title 41 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Section 102-3.65(a), notice is hereby given that the Charter for the National Cancer Institute Board of Scientific Advisors was renewed for an additional two-year period on October 8, 2017.

                    Inquiries may be directed to Anna Snouffer, Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Mail code 4875), Telephone (301) 496-2123, or                     *snouffea@od.nih.gov*.                

Dated: October 17, 2017.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-22824 Filed 10-19-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0258

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID LAWRENCE PITTSLEY, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 12, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 8 2021

12/08/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0258
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SFBC International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I David Natan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/DAVIDNATAN          
| | Chief Financial Officer



Date: November 29, 2005





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Arnold Hantman, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of SFBC International, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))  for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 3, 2004



/s/ Arnold Hantman

Chief Executive Officer
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Search Home > FTDO > Commissioner Sola Meets with Bahamian Ambassador to Address Opportunities for Maritime Cooperation

Commissioner Sola Meets with Bahamian Ambassador to Address Opportunities for Maritime Cooperation


Posted on:


April 23, 2024 2 men in black suits standing under a chandelier in a large reception areaCommissioner Louis E. Sola met with Wendall K. Jones, Ambassador of the Bahamas to the United States, to discuss critical maritime issues.



Their meeting, held in Washington, D.C. earlier in April, provided the opportunity to discuss maritime issues of common interest to the Bahamas and the United States. Specifically, Commissioner Sola and Ambassador Jones focused on the topics of maritime sustainability and port infrastructure enhancements as potential areas to work together.



In addition, they discussed other opportunities for cooperation between the maritime sectors of both nations, such as regulatory measures and economic incentives that strengthen the maritime industry. Commissioner Sola and Ambassador Jones are equally committed to the success of their nations’ maritime industries.



Commissioner Sola expressed gratitude for the productive dialog in a committed collaboration towards addressing maritime issues that affect both nations.



(L-R) Commissioner Louis Sola and Ambassador Wendall Jones



*Louis E. Sola is a Commissioner with the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission. The thoughts and comments expressed here are his own and do not necessarily represent the position of the Commission.* Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC UIT OCTOB ER 21 , 2005 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 11804 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D o c k e tN o . 0 0 - 0 6 0 2 2 - C R - D MM U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s C H A R L E S L L E W L Y N , a .k .a . C h a r le s L le w y lin , D e f e n d an t- A p p e llan t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( O c t ob e r 21, 2005) B efo re T JO F L A T , D U B IN A an dB A R K E T T , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: C h ar le s L le w ly n ( “L le w ly n ” ) , af e d e r a l p r is o n e rp r o c e e d in g p r o s e , ap p e a ls th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e n ia l o f h is m o tio n to d is m is s h is in d ic tm e n t, f ile dp u r s u an t to2

F e d. R . C r i m . P . 12( b) . O n M ar c h 7, 2005, L l e w l y n, pr oc e e di ng pr o s e , f i l e d a

“N un c P ro T un c M ot i on t o D i sm i ss Indi ctm entP ursuantt o F ed. R . C ri m . P . 6(f) & 1 2 ( b ) , e t. s e q .,” a s s e rtin g v ar io u s d e f e c ts inh is in d ic tm e n t. I n th e in s tan t c a s e , L le w ly n is u s in g F e d .R .C r im .P . 1 2 ( b ) to a tta c kh is c onvi c t i on a nd s e nt e nc e a f t e rthi s c ourta f

f i rm e d thi s c onvi c t i on and s e nt e nc e on di r e c tappe a l , a nd hi s § 2255 m ot i on w a s uns uc c e s s f ul . B e c aus e L l e w l y n’ s m ot i on w a s the f unc t i ona l e qui va l e ntof

as uc c e s s i ve m ot i on t o va c a t e , w i thi n the m e ani ng of § 2244( b) ( 3) ( A ) , a nd be c aus e he ne ve robt a i ne d l e a ve t o f i l e as uc c e s s i ve m ot i on, i tw a s s ubj e c tt o di s m i s s a l f orl a c k of

j ur i s di c t i on. F e l ke r , 101 F . 3d 660- 61; s e e a l s o 28 U . S . C . § 2244( b) ( r e qui r i ng the di s m i s s a l of s uc c e s s i ve pe t i t i ons f

orw hi c h no l e a ve i s obt a i ne d) . A s s uc h, w e va c a t e the j udgm e ntof the di s tr i c tc ourta nd r e m and w i th i ns truc t i ons t o di s m i s s f orl a c k of

j ur i s di c t i on. V AC AT E D A ND RE MAND E D.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventiv Health, Inc. ("the Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eran Broshy,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Eran Broshy


Eran Broshy
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7436** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. KYRON WILLIAM GEANES , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easter n District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:04

- cr - 00425

- LMB

- 1 )

Submitted : March 31, 2011 Decided: April 5, 2011

Before NIEMEYER , SHEDD, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Kyron William Geanes, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kyron Geanes appeals the district court’ s order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Geanes , 1:0 4

- cr - 00425

- LMB

- 1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simex Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kjell Jagelid, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2003                           /s/ Kjell Jagelid
                                                    -------------------

                                                    By: Kjell Jagelid
                                                    Its: President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simex Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Simex Technologies,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Meets to Hear Briefings on Supply Chain Teams, Shipping Forum, Procedural Changes and Discuss Petition","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zWOvIbRSmG\"><a href=\"\/commission-meets-to-hear-briefings-on-supply-chain-teams-shipping-forum-procedural-changes-and-discuss-petition\/\">Commission Meets to Hear Briefings on Supply Chain Teams, Shipping Forum, Procedural Changes and Discuss Petition<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meets-to-hear-briefings-on-supply-chain-teams-shipping-forum-procedural-changes-and-discuss-petition\/embed\/#?secret=zWOvIbRSmG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meets to Hear Briefings on Supply Chain Teams, Shipping Forum, Procedural Changes and Discuss Petition” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"zWOvIbRSmG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert F. JERNBERG, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-30032.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submission Deferred Dec. 8, 2006.

*723Resubmitted May 8, 2008.*

Filed May 8, 2008.

Marcia Good Hurd, Esq., Office of The U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mark S. Werner, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FARRIS, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)

MEMORANDUM **

Robert F. Jernberg challenges his sentence on appeal. At the time the sentence was imposed, several relevant legal issues had not yet been resolved. In light of decisions rendered since that time, it appears that the Guidelines may have been given excessive weight as a factor under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We therefore vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

The district court’s statements at both the change of plea hearing and the sentencing hearing make clear the district court understood that the Guidelines were advisory, even under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b)(2), and that “sentencing proceedings are to begin by determining the applicable Guidelines range.” *United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 991 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). Nonetheless, undue weight may have been given to the Guidelines in determining Jernberg’s sentence. The district court expressly stated that it thought it was required by law to give “significant weight” to the Guidelines, and the sentence imposed was at the bottom end of the calculated range. It has now been established that the “Guidelines factor” should not “be given more or less weight than any other” factor in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). *Carty,*520 F.3d at 991-92, 994 (“It would have been error had the judge actually ... weighted the Guidelines range more heavily than other § 3553(a) factors.”). Because we cannot be sure that the same sentence would have been imposed absent the extra weight given to the Guidelines, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2832 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2832

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
        investment income of private colleges and universities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2021

  Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
        investment income of private colleges and universities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Don't Tax Higher Education Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON INVESTMENT INCOME OF PRIVATE COLLEGES 
              AND UNIVERSITIES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking subchapter H (and by striking the item relating to 
such subchapter in the table of subchapters for such chapter).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 19, 2012

Augusta Resource Corporation

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: Augusta Resource
Corporation

I, John I. Ajie, do hereby
consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report
entitled Rosemont Copper Project Updated Feasibility Study, dated January 14,
2009 for the Rosemont Project located in Pima County, Arizona in the Form 40-F
Annual Report dated March 19, 2012, and any amendments thereto, and the Annual
Information Form of Augusta Resource Corporation (the Company) dated March 19,
2012.

I also consent to the use of my
name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and
the Annual Information Form dated March 19, 2012 and to the incorporation by
reference of the Companys Annual Report on Form 40-F and any amendments
thereto, and the Annual Information Form dated March 19, 2012 in the Companys
Form S-8 Registration Statement (SEC File No. 333-173297).

| | By: | /s/ John I. Ajie             
| | --- | -----------------------------
| |     | John I. Ajie                 
| |     | Vice President of Engineering
| |     | URS                          
| |     | Denver, Colorado, USA        

---