alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Chander KANT; Ashima K. Kant, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. JAY L. COHEN, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 10-1054.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 19, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 22, 2010.

Chander Kant, Ashima K. Kant, Appellants Pro Se. Deborah Murrell Whelihan, Jordan, Coyne & Savits, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant appeal the district court’s orders granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Kant v. Cohen,*No. 8:08-cv-00318-RWT (D.Md. Dec. 11, 2009); 2009 WL 3336083 (Oct. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MELVIN AVON THOMAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR95-175-S, CA-98-3136-S)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 12, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Avon Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

September 17, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on September 22, 1998. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date that the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet

that we take as the effective date of the district court’s

decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.

1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Avon Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Thomas, Nos. CR-95-

175-S; CA-98-3136-S (D. Md. Sept. 22, 1998).* We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 210 (Wednesday, November 1, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 50598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 573

[Docket No. FDA-2014-F-0295]


DSM Nutritional Products, Inc.; Withdrawal of Food Additive 
Petition (Animal Use)

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notification; withdrawal of petition for rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing the 
withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a food additive 
petition (FAP 2280) proposing that the food additive regulations be 
amended to provide for the safe use of 25-hydroxyvitamin D<INF>3</INF> 
in feed for swine.

DATES: The food additive petition was withdrawn on September 13, 2017.

ADDRESSES: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the 
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into 
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts; and/or go to the Dockets 
Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chelsea Trull, Center for Veterinary 
Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, 
MD 20855, 240-402-6729, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#64070c01081701054a1016110808240200054a0c0c174a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="315259545d4254501f4543445d5d715755501f5959421f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal 
Register of March 25, 2014 (79 FR 16252), we announced that we had 
filed a food additive petition (FAP 2280), submitted by DSM Nutritional 
Products, 45 Waterview Blvd., Parsippany, NJ 07054. The petition 
proposed to amend the food additive regulations in 21 CFR part 573, 
Food Additives Permitted in Feed and Drinking Water of Animals, to 
provide for the safe use of 25-hydroxyvitamin D<INF>3</INF> in feed for 
swine. DSM Nutritional Products, Inc. has now withdrawn the petition 
without prejudice to a future filing (21 CFR 571.7).

    Dated: October 26, 2017.
Anna K. Abram,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning, Legislation, and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2017-23729 Filed 10-31-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Tractor
Holdings, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2008, I, Chen Guocheng, Chief
Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.




Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. Such
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of China Tractor Holdings, Inc.




Dated:
April 15, 2010




/s/
      Chen GuochengChen
      GuochengChief
      Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6277

JURONE HAMMOND,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOHN S. WOLFE, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-03721-RDB)

Submitted: August 26, 2022 Decided: September 13, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jurone Hammond, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew John DiMiceli, Assistant Attorney General, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6277 Doc: 17 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Jurone Hammond seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for failure to exhaust state court remedies. This 

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court 

order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties.” Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 

694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Our review of the record reveals that the district court did not adjudicate all of the 

claims that Hammond raised during the § 2254 proceedings. Id. at 696-97. Specifically, 

the court did not consider Hammond’s argument that his attorney provided ineffective 

assistance by essentially abandoning Hammond at trial and conceding Hammond’s guilt 

without his consent. We therefore conclude that the order Hammond seeks to appeal is 

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Porter, 803 

F.3d at 696-97.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand to the district 

court for consideration of the unresolved claim. Id. at 699. We express no view on the 

ultimate disposition of any of Hammond’s claims. We deny Hammond’s motion for a 

certificate of appealability as unnecessary, deny his motion to appoint counsel at this 

juncture, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6277 Doc: 17 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6277 Doc: 17 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
OrgNo Organization  Name Reason for Action License No. Terminaton Date Comment

017033 AUTICO INTERNATIONAL LLC Failure to maintain a bond 017033N 11/30/2021

021417 BNSF LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Voluntary Surrender 001986F 11/3/2021

025992 CARIBCONEX, LLC Voluntary Surrender 025992F 11/25/2021 NVOCC 025992N remains active

023748 CLOVER INTERNACIONAL, LLC Failure to maintain a bond 004258F 11/7/2021 NVOCC 004258N remains active

008479 CUSTOMS AND TRADE SERVICES, INC. Voluntary Surrender 003275F 11/15/2021

019940 HANJIN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY LIMITED Voluntary Surrender 019940N 11/17/2021

020713 HART WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS, INC. Failure to maintain a bond 020713N 11/11/2021 Freight Forwarder 020713F remains active

025473 INCODEL GLOBAL LOGISTICS, LLC Failure to maintain bonds 025473NF 11/28/2021

013533 SUNWOOD INTERNATIONAL, INC. Voluntary Surrender 004440N 11/18/2021

028489 TIO LOGIX USA, LLC Voluntary Surrender 028489F 11/16/2021

027385 UNIVERSAL WAY INTERNATIONAL, INC. Failure to maintain a bond 027385N 11/15/2021

025728 VITAL WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS CORPORATION Failure to maintain bonds 025728NF 11/20/2021

022435 WWT AMERICA LLC Voluntary Surrender 022435N 11/27/2021

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations & Surrenders

November 1, 2021  to  November 30,  2021
**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Amended Annual Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December                31,                2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB                for the                year ended December 31, 2006, fairly represents in all material respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of HSM Holdings,                Inc. |

| Date:                August 8, 2007                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                 |
| HSM                Holdings, Inc.                                    |
|                                                                 |
| By:                /s/ Simone Crighton                               |
| Simone                CrightonChief                Financial Officer |
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventiv Health, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Emery, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 DATE:
      May 10, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /S/    JOHNR.
      EMERY**John
      R. Emery**
      **Chief
      Financial Officer**
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Ventiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by Ventiv Health, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Simex Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Kjell I. Jagelid Kjell I. Jagelid, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Date: November 27, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EDUCATIONAL MEDICAL, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      14,047,889
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,161,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                   922,704
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,799,988
<PP&E>                                      13,005,327
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,387,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,072,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,314,441
<BONDS>                                      6,128,731
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        74,181
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,125,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,072,534
<SALES>                                     49,449,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,449,680
<CGS>                                       43,483,781
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               43,483,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,421,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,239,151
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             284,162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,021,280
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (845,363)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,866,643
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (308,683)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,557,960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36<F1>
<FN>
<F1>TAG (EPS - PRIMARY) DENOTES BASIC EPS. BOTH BASIC AND DILUTED EPS ARE SHOWN
ON A PRO-FORMA BASIS GIVING EFFECT TO A MARCH 31, 1997 POOLING OF INTERESTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (121,000)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (123,173)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (123,173)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        



</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ME I C HE N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 71094 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 673- 936 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry10, 2011 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M e i C he n, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order s um m ar i l y a ff i rm i ng an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s ( “ IJ ”) deci si on denyi ng her app l i ca t i on for a sy l um , w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and rel i ef un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture ( “ C A T ”) . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 

# FI LED JAN 21 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

U .S .C § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs u b s tan tia l e v id e n c e th e a g e n c y ’s a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility f in d in g s , Fa ra h v . A s h c r o ft , 348 F . 3d 1153, 1156 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , a nd w e de nythe p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he agency’ s a dv er se cr edi bi l i ty f i nd i ng i s s up po rt ed by subst ant i alevi dence be c aus e a tC he n’ s a i rporti nt e rvi e w C he n r e l i e d s ol e l yon he rpa rt i c i pa t i on i n F a l un G o n g a n do m itte da n ym e n tio n o f f e a rb a s e do n C h in a ’s f

a m ilyp lan n in g p o lic ie s . Se e L i v . A s h c r o

ft, 37 8 F . 3d 95 9, 96 2-63 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( sw orn ai rporti nt ervi ew s ta te m e n t w a s ar e liab le im p e a c h m e n t s o u r c e th a t s up p o rte da d v e r s e c r e d ib ility d e te rm in a tio n ) ; id. a t962 ( a s l ong a s one of the i de nt i f

i e d gr ounds i s s upport e d by s ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e a nd goe s t o the he a rtof the c l a i m , w e a r e bound t o a c c e ptthe ag en cy ’s ad v er se cr ed ib il ity f in d in g ). In th e ab se n ce o f c re d ib le testim o n y, C h en ’s a s y lu m a n dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. Se e Farah , 348 F . 3d a t1156. B e c aus e C he n’ s C A T c l a i m i s ba s e d on the s a m e e vi de nc e the a ge nc yf ound no tcr edi bl e and she poi nt s t o n o o ther e vi dence i n the re cord t o sho w i ti s m ore lik e lyth a n n o t th a t s h e w o u ldb e to rtu r e din C h in a , h e rC A T c la im f a ils . See Farah , 348 F . 3d a t1156- 57. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Opinion issued January 31 , 201 3

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 12 - 00 536 - CV

——————————— SHARON L. HILL , Appellant

V. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SYSTEM , Appellee

On Appeal from the 11 th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca u se No. 0854165

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Sharon L. Hill , ha s neither paid the required filing fee for this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must
pay

— at the time an item is presented for filing

— whatever fees are required by2

statute or Supreme Court order.” ), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 51.207 (West Supp. 2012), §

. 51.941(a) (West 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2012 ) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicia l Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 ( Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX
. R. A PP
. P . app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). The filing fee was due on June 22 , 2012

. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel cons ists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown

.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer  of  Legacy Wine & Spirits International, Ltd.(the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended September 30, 2010  (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.