alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of SkyPostal Networks, Inc.on Form 10-K for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2008, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Albert Hernandez, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer andPresident of the Company and I, A J Hernandez, acting in the capacity as theChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 
| /s/Albert Hernandez                   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| Albert Hernandez                      |   |
|                                  |   |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |   |

 
| April 24, 2009 |   |
|----------------|--------|

 
| /s/ A.J. Hernandez      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| A.J. Hernandez          |   |
|                    |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 
| April 24, 2009 |   |
|----------------|--------|

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10188]

Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189) (“INA”), and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I have concluded that there is a sufficient factual basis to find that the following are aliases of Abdallah Azzam Brigades (and other aliases): Marwan Hadid Brigades, also known as Marwan Hadid Brigade.

Therefore, pursuant to Section 219(b) of the INA, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(b)), I hereby amend the designation of Abdallah Azzam Brigades as a foreign terrorist organization to include the following new aliases: Marwan Hadid Brigades, also known as Marwan Hadid Brigade.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: September 27, 2017.

Rex W. Tillerson,

 Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2017-23789 Filed 11-1-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
#### Joga SINGH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72591.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 21, 2011.

*653Kuldip Dhariwal, Esquire, Law Office Kuldip Dhariwal, Fremont, CA, for Petitioner.

Aliza Bessie Alyeshmerni, Richard M. Evans, Esquire, Assistant Director, Rebecca Anne Niburg, Esquire, Andrew Jacob Oliveira, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Joga Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 995, 998 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that, even if Singh credibly established past persecution, any presumption of a well-founded fear was rebutted by evidence that he could reasonably relocate within India. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(l)(i)(B); *Gonzalez-Hernandez,*336 F.3d at 998-99. Accordingly, Singh’s asylum claim fails.

Because Singh failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Gonzalez-Hernandez,*336 F.3d at 1001 n. 5.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because *654Singh failed to demonstrate it is more likely than not he will be tortured if returned to India. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(3); *see also Singh v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 1100, 1113 (9th Cir.2006).

We reject Singh’s contention that the IJ failed to adequately consider his documentary evidence. *See Larita-Martinez v. INS,*220 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir.2000) (petitioner must overcome the presumption that the agency considered all the evidence).

We decline to review Singh’s contention that he is eligible for humanitarian asylum because the BIA did not review this claim, *see Azanov v. Ashcroft,*364 F.3d 1013, 1020-21 (9th Cir.2004), and he does not contend the BIA erred in failing to do so, *see Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Yan Tsang, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Super Luck, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements, for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)         all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 27, 2009
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 4, 2008

Augusta Resource Corporation

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: Augusta Resource
Corporation

I, Shea Clark Smith, do hereby
consent to the filing of the written disclosure of the technical report entitled
2007 Mineral Resource Update for the Rosemont Project, Pima County, Arizona,
USA dated April 26, 2007, in the Form 40-F Annual Report and the Annual
Information Form of Augusta Resource Corporation (the Company) dated March 4,
2008.

I also consent to the use of my
name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report and Annual Information Form dated
March 4, 2008 and to the use of the name Minerals Exploration &
Environmental Geochemistry, in my capacity as Principal Geochemist of Minerals
Exploration & Environmental Geochemistry.

| | By: | */s/
      Shea Clark Smith*        
| | --- | ------------------------------------
| |     | Shea Clark Smith, P.G.              
| |     | Principal Geochemist                
| |     | Minerals Exploration & Environmental
| |     | Geochemistry                        
| |     | Washoe Valley, Nevada               

---
# EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of CurrencySharesSM Canadian Dollar Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Financial
Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: January 25, 2008

/s/ Nick Bonos  Nick Bonos*Chief
Financial Officer(principal financial officer)

*The Registrant is a trust
and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex
Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
Offer to Purchase Pemco World Air Services, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.46 
  
 April 9, 2007 
  
 CONFIDENTIAL 
  
 Mr. Ron Aramini 
 Chief Executive Officer 
 Pemco Aviation Group, Inc. 
 1943 North 50th Street 
 Birmingham, Alabama 35212

  

	 	Re:	Offer to Purchase Pemco World Air Services, Inc. (“PWAS”) 

  
 Dear Ron: 
  
 In order to assure that Pemco Aviation Group, Inc. is not forced into accepting a less than appropriate bid to acquire PWAS due to financing needs, I
hereby agree, at your option, (1) to purchase all of the outstanding capital stock of PWAS for $30 million in cash, or (2) to provide or cause to be provided to Pemco financing on commercially reasonable terms in an amount sufficient to refinance
all of Pemco’s then current debt such that no principal payments would be due until April 30, 2008. 
  
 The documentation for the transaction will be negotiated in good faith and include mutual and customary representations, warranties, covenants, conditions
and indemnification. The conditions to the purchase transaction will include, among other things, the receipt of all required consents and approvals, the receipt of a fairness opinion to the effect that the transaction is fair, from a financial
point of view, to Pemco’s stockholders, and the absence of any material adverse change in the business of PWAS. If the parties are unable to obtain all required consents and approvals, or to otherwise close the purchase transaction in a timely
manner to satisfy creditor demands, I will immediately arrange the financing contemplated by clause (2) above. 
  
 This offer will remain open until the earlier of April 30, 2008 or the sale of PWAS to a third party. You are under no obligation to accept this offer at
any time. 
  

	
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 /s/ Michael E. Tennenbaum

	 Michael E. Tennenbaum
----

| (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2012 of FindEx.com, Inc. (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FindEx.com, Inc. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Steven Malone                                      |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Steven Malone                                          |
|   |   | President                                              |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |

----
RONALD LEE JACKSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3652

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 12, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mallory D. Cooper , Judge

.

Nancy A. Danie ls, Public Defender, and Pamela D. Presnell, Assistant Public

Defender , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Angel a R. Hensel, Assistant Attorney

General , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
exv10w47



 




Exhibit 10.47







December 7, 2006




Penn Octane Corporation

840 Apollo Street, Suite 313

El Segundo, CA 90245




Attn: Mr. Ian Bothwell




Gentlemen:



We refer to the Line Letter dated October 14, 1997 as may have been amended, supplemented or
modified from time to time (the “Line Letter”).



Please be advised of the following amendments to the Line Letter:




	•	 	The Aggregate principal sum and face amount available under the uncommitted secured
credit facility is Fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) instead of Twenty million
dollars ($20,000,000) as a result of the LPG asset sale.






Other conditions to continued availability under this facility include:




	 	•	 	Hedge account to be established to cover any unsold product value. Cash collateral will
secure said product value until such an account is established.






All other terms and conditions of our agreement remain in effect including:




	 	•	 	Maintenance of a minimum net worth, as defined in the existing agreements, of $10,000,000.






Please sign and return this document.








Accepted and Agreed to on this 15th day of December, 2006.








RZB FINANCE LLC 1133 Avenue of the Americas, 16th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10036 • Telephone: (212) 845-4100 • Fax: (212) 944-2093
Telex: 6738478 RZBLLCNY • A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF RAIFFEISEN ZENTRALBANK ÖSTERREICH AG (RZB-AUSTRIA) •
Head Office: A-1030 Vienna, Am Stadtpark 9, Postal Address: A-1011 Vienna, P.O. Box 50 • Member of UNICO Banking Group
1996 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-5-1996

Phillips v. Keyport

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 95-5143

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1996 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Phillips v. Keyport" (1996). 1996 Decisions. Paper 207.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996/207
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

_____________ 

No. 95-5143 

_____________ 

GEORGE PHILLIPS; PHILIP VITALE, 

 Appellants

v. 

BOROUGH OF KEYPORT; VICTOR RHODES; 

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 

_____________ 

On Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the District of New Jersey 

(D.C. Civil No. 93-415) 

_____________ 

Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, 

 GREENBERG, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, 

LEWIS, McKEE, SAROKIN, and ROSENN1, Circuit Judges. 

O R D E R

 A majority of the active judges having voted for 

rehearing en banc in the above appeal, it is 

 O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court list the 

above case for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the court. 

 By the Court, 

 /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter 

 _____________________________ 

 

 Chief Judge 

Dated: April 5, 1996 

 

1as to panel rehearing only.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3388-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the Seminole Tribe of Florida (FEMA-3388-EM), dated September 8, 2017, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued October 12, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective October 4, 2017.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-23079 Filed 10-23-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2480

LISA A. FRISON; ELLIS S. FRISON, JR.,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

RYAN HOMES; NVR, INCORPORATED; KBM FINANCIAL

GROUP, LLC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-04-350-AW)

Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 19, 2005

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

E. Scott Frison, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Jeffrey

Marc Mervis, MERVIS & ASSOCIATES, Rockville, Maryland; Bonnie

Hochman Rothell, KROOTH & ALTMAN, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lisa A. Frison and Ellis S. Frison, Jr., appeal the

district court’s orders denying their request for a temporary

restraining order and injunctive relief, granting summary judgment

to defendants and awarding sanctions against them pursuant to Fed.

R. Civ. P. 11, and denying their motion for recusal. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Frison v. Ryan

Homes, No. CA-04-350-AW (D. Md. filed Feb. 23, 2004 & entered

Feb. 24, 2004; filed Oct. 29, 2004 & entered Nov. 1, 2004; Nov. 10,

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED