alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Nobilis Health Corp.: Exhibit 10.10 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






AMENDMENT TO MASTER AGREEMENT 

     Amendment (the “Amendment”) to
the Agreement, dated September 2, 2014, by and among First Surgical Partners
Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“First Surgical”), and Northstar
Healthcare Inc., a British Columbia corporation (“Northstar”) (the
“Master Agreement”). Capitalized terms not otherwise set forth herein shall have
the meanings specified for such terms in the Master Agreement. 

     The Master Agreement is hereby
amended as follows: 

     1. Article V. Certain Covenants
and Agreements is amended to add the following: “Section 5.4 Advance.
Within ten (10) days from the date of this Agreement, First Surgical shall
provide to Northstar a list of trade payables of FS Surgical and FS Hospital
needing immediate payment (“Immediate Payables List”). The aggregate amount of
trade payables on the Immediate Payables List (the “Immediate Payables Amount”)
shall not exceed $500,000. Promptly following receipt of the Immediate Payables
List, Northstar shall advance to Newco an amount equal to the Immediate Payables
Amount, which shall constitute an advance on the Northstar Capital Contribution
(the “NS Advance”). Newco shall use the NS Advance to advance FS Surgical and FS
Hospital an equivalent amount (the “FS Advance”). FS Surgical and FS Hospital
shall use the FS Advance to promptly make payments of the payables reflected on
the Immediate Payables List. After Newco has made the FS Advance and prior to
Closing, First Surgical agrees that all collections received by FS Surgical and
FS Hospital will be applied to the payment of trade payables and operating
expenses, specifically excluding any payments for accelerated loan repayments
(but not required payments of interest and principal), real property leases,
and/or management fees. Effective September 1, 2014, Newco will recognize all
revenues and expenses related to revenues and expenses of FS Surgical and FS
Hospital. In the event that Closing does not occur, First Surgical will cause
repayment to Newco of the FS Advance. 

     2. Section 7.4 is deleted and
replaced in its entirety by the following: 

     “Section 7.4 Northstar Capital
Contribution. Simultaneous with the Closing, Northstar shall make the
Northstar Capital Contribution, less the NS Advance made under Section 5.4
hereof.” 

INTENTIONALLY BLANK,
SIGNATURE PAGE IMMEDIATELY
FOLLOWS] 




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Northstar and
First Surgical have executed this Amendment effective as of the ___day of
September, 2014. 

	 	NORTHSTAR HEALTHCARE INC. 
	 	  
	 	  
	 	By:
  
	 	Name:
    
	 	Title: 
	 	  
	 	  
	 	  
	 	FIRST SURGICAL PARTNERS 
	 	HOLDINGS, INC. 
	 	  
	 	  
	 	By:
  
	 	Name:
    
	 	Title:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Findex.com, Inc. (the “company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Kirk R.
      Rowland, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted),
      that
      to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the company at the end of the periods covered by the Periodic Report.





In
      Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of
      this 21st day of
      October, 2005.








By
            /s/
                Kirk R. RowlandKirk
                R. Rowland, CPAChief
                Financial Officer
#### ADVANCEME, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RAPIDPAY, LLC, Defendant, and Merchant Money Tree, Inc. and Reach Financial, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2008-1036.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 15, 2008.

Michael N. Edelman, Paul, Hastings, Ja-nofsky *&*Walker LLP, of Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Ronald S. Lemieux. Of counsel was Douglas E. Olson. Of counsel on the brief was Parris J. Sanz, Capital Access Network, Inc., of Scarsdale, NY.

Willem G. Schuurman, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., of Austin, TX, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Brian K. Buss, Joseph D. Gray, Graham E. Sutliff, and R. Floyd Walker.

Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3509 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3509

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 19, 2010

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To reauthorize State agricultural mediation programs under title V of 
                  the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agricultural Credit Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 506 of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (7 U.S.C. 5106) 
is amended by striking ``2010'' and inserting ``2015''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 18, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Meeting Includes Vote to Update OTI Rules & Briefing on Carrier Alliances","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QJgF4Km3KY\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-includes-vote-to-update-oti-rules-briefing-on-carrier\/\">Commission Meeting Includes Vote to Update OTI Rules & Briefing on Carrier Alliances<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-includes-vote-to-update-oti-rules-briefing-on-carrier\/embed\/#?secret=QJgF4Km3KY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Includes Vote to Update OTI Rules & Briefing on Carrier Alliances” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"QJgF4Km3KY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000633 15-MAR-2017 07:59 AM
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. McCutcheon, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to
the best of my knowledge, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |  |  |        |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2010 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jeffrey A. McCutcheon                        
|                   |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Jeffrey A. McCutcheon                            
|                   |  |  |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be retained by LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



1
#### TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, and Patriot Scientific Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARM, LTD. and Arm, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2008-1020.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 9, 2008.

Rehearing Denied June 6, 2008.

Roger L. Cook, Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP, of San Francisco, CA, argued for all plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief for Technology Properties Limited, Inc., were Nancy L. Tompkins, Eric P. Jacobs, and Cathy E. Cretsinger.

Charles T. Hoge, Kirby Noonan Lance *&*Hoge LLP, of San Diego, CA, for plaintiff-appellant, Patriot Scientific Corporation.

Kevin P. Anderson, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendantsappellees. With him on the brief were Gregory R. Lyons and James H. Wallace, Jr. Of counsel was Brian H. Pandya.

Before DYK and PROST, Circuit Judges, and HOCHBERG, District Judge.*

*

 Honorable Faith S. Hochberg, District Judge, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 86.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134112 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134112 COA: 273092 St. Joseph CC: 80-004365 DONNIE J. DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 19, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-168005) of
CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust of our reports dated January 14, 2011, with respect to the financial
statements of CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for
the year ended October 31, 2010.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|                     
|McLean, Virginia     
|March 10, 2011
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

J. ROE BUCKLEY / EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, J. Roe Buckley, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 06-A, L.P. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K, for the annual
period ended December 31, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the
requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ J. Roe BuckleyName:

J. Roe BuckleyDate:

March 31, 2009
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 6 -00588 -CV G av ur nik Bui lde r s, L.P . , A ppe lla nt

v . John A. Darling, Appellee F ROM THE DIST RICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO . D-1 -GN-0 6-0 02 57 4 , H ON ORAB LE WI LL IA M E . B EN DE R , J UDGE PRES ID IN G M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Ap pe lla nt G avurn ik B uil de rs , L .P. and a pp e lle e JohnA. Da

rl inghave e nte re d into a settlement ag ree ment and have fil ed an agree d motion to stay this appeal. We g rant the motion and abate this appeal until J anuar y 29, 2007.

__________________________________________

Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and Pember

ton Filed: Nove mber 30, 2006
FLRA NEWS

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY - WASHINGTON, DC 20424

Contact: Eric Prag FLRA.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 771-444-5859 September 29, 2023

The FLRA Issues Proposed Rule Regarding In-Person Filing.

Today, the FLRA issued a proposed rule, which would revise 5 C.F.R. § 2429.24(a) to specify

that, if parties wish to file documents with the FLRA’s Office of Case Intake and Publication in 

person, then they must schedule an appointment at least one business day in advance. The 

proposed rule also makes minor technical and formatting changes.

The FLRA welcomes comments on the proposed rule. Any written comments must be received 

on or before October 30, 2023. The Federal Register Notice includes instructions for submitting 

comments.

###

The FLRA administers the labor-management relations program for 2.1 million non-Postal federal 

employees worldwide, approximately 1.2 million of whom are represented in 2,200 bargaining 

units. It is charged with providing leadership in establishing policies and guidance related to 

federal sector labor-management relations and with resolving disputes under, and ensuring 

compliance with, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**DIGIMARCCORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the periodic report of DigimarcCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, MichaelMcConnell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of thedate hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 ofthe United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

This Certification has not been, and shall not bedeemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Date: April 7, 2005

 
| By:    |    /s/ Michael McConnell  | * * |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|----------|
|   | Michael McConnell  *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2736 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2736

     To amend the Social Security Act to prohibit State and local 
 governments from obligating any coronavirus relief funds provided by 
the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 until all coronavirus relief funds 
 made available by the CARES Act are obligated, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2021

   Ms. Mace introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Social Security Act to prohibit State and local 
 governments from obligating any coronavirus relief funds provided by 
the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 until all coronavirus relief funds 
 made available by the CARES Act are obligated, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRING COMPLETE OBLIGATION OF CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUNDS 
              MADE AVAILABLE TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS UNDER CARES 
              ACT.

    Title VI of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) is 
amended by adding after section 603 the following:

``SEC. 604. PROHIBITION ON ADDITIONAL FUNDS WITHOUT COMPLETE 
              OBLIGATION.

    ``No funds under sections 602 or 603 may be used to make payments 
or distributions to any State, territorial, or Tribal government, or a 
unit of local government that has not obligated 100 percent of their 
previously allocated CRF funds under section 601.''.
                                 <all>
```
Table of Contents
 Exhibit 8.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF TAM S.A. Name
     Business name
     Jurisdiction of incorporationTAM Linhas Aéreas S.A.
     TAM Linhas Aéreas
     BrazilFidelidade Viagens e Turismo Ltda.
     TAM Viagens
     BrazilTransportes Aereos del Mercosur S.A.
     TAM Mercosur
     ParaguayTAM Capital Inc.
     TAM Capital
     Cayman IslandsTAM Financial Services 1 Ltd.
     TAM Financial 1
     Cayman IslandsTAM Financial Services 2 Ltd.
     TAM Financial 2
     Cayman Islands


---
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 MARCH 27, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_____________________________

No. 06-12984

_____________________________

D. C. Docket No. 98-00063-CV-6

SHERNIKA HOLTON,

SPENCER WILSON,

SANDRA MCINTYRE,

MARY HILL,

WILLIE MAE LEWIS,

SHARON BOSTICK,

THE THOMAS COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP,

GLADYS SHOTWELL,

AUDREY LINDER,

LISA WEBB,

JENNIFER HIGHTOWER,

EVELYN WILKERSON,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

CITY OF THOMASVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant-Appellee.
 Plaintiffs have filed only a Petition for Rehearing En Banc. A petition for rehearing en banc,

*

however, “will also be treated as a petition for rehearing before the original panel.” 11th Cir. R. 35-

5.

 Honorable John R. Gibson, United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by **

designation.

2

_________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

_________________________________________

ON PETITION(S) FOR REHEARING*

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and GIBSON, Circuit Judges. **

PER CURIAM:

Briefly stated, we, in our more recent opinion (490 F.3d 1257) in this case,

affirmed the District Court’s decision dealing with whether the school district’s

use of ability grouping either presently discriminates intentionally against black

students or reflects–per the McNeal decision–the present result of past unlawful

segregation in the district.

Plaintiffs say, in part, that we were wrong to represent that, if present

intentional racial discrimination by the school district has been a motivating factor
3

in the present racial imbalance in classes, the federal courts could do nothing if

other causes also contributed substantially. We did not intend to say that. The

opinion writer was shifting between two ideas: present discriminatory intention

and present results of past discrimination.

Still, it is hard to be always clear. And we do not wish to be confusing. So,

if the opinion–taken as a whole–can be read to say something like what plaintiffs

suggest, we write today to say that the opinion should not be read to have decided

such a thing. We did not need to be or mean to be innovative.

For the ability grouping, the district court, as a matter of fact, has repeatedly

found no present intent to discriminate on account of race. Given the whole

evidence, that finding is not clearly erroneous. Everything we wrote last July must

be taken in that context. We stand by our decision.

Petition for Rehearing DENIED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT:

/s/ J.L. Edmondson

______________________________

CHIEF JUDGE
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Findex.com, Inc. (the “company”) on Form
      10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Kirk R.
      Rowland, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted),
      that
      to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the company at the end of the periods covered by the Periodic Report.





In
          Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of
          this 21st day of
          December, 2005.




By
            /s/
                Kirk R. RowlandKirk
                R. Rowland, CPAChief
                Financial Officer