UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                          FORM 10-QSB - Amendment No. 2


[xx] QUARTERLY  REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE ACT
     OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2002

                        Commission file Number: 000-49870
                                                ---------


                           BIG CAT MINING CORPORATION
        -----------------------------------------------------------------
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)


                                     Nevada
          -------------------------------------------------------------
         (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)


                                   98-0205749
                     ---------------------------------------
                     (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)


                                7928 Rowland Road
                        Edmonton, Alberta, T6A 3W1 Canada
                    ----------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


                                  (780)414-0763
                           ---------------------------
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
equity, as of the latest practicable date:    1,114,000 common shares
                                              as at October 31, 2002

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):  Yes [ ]    No [ X ]

<PAGE>

                           BIG CAT MINING CORPORATION


                                      INDEX

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

         Item 1   Financial Statements                                     Page
                                                                           ----
                  Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2002                      F-2

                  Statement of Operations for the period ended
                  October 31, 2002                                          F-3

                  Statements of Cash Flows for the period ended
                  October 31, 2002                                          F-4

                  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                F-5

         Item 2   Plan of Operation                                           6

         Item 3   Controls and Procedures                                    18

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

         Item 1   Legal Proceedings                                          19

         Item 2   Changes in Securities                                      19

         Item 3   Defaults Upon Senior Securities                            19

         Item 4   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders        19

         Item 5   Other Information                                          19

         Item 6   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8K                            19


         SIGNATURES                                                          19


<PAGE>

                           BIG CAT MINING CORPORATION

                              Financial Statements

                                October 31, 2002

<PAGE>


                           BIG CAT MINING CORPORATION
                        (An Exploration Stage Enterprise)
                          Index to Financial Statements
                                                                           Page
                                                                           ----



Balance Sheet at October 31, 2002 (unaudited) .........................     F-2

Statements of  Operations  for the three months ended  October 31, 2002
     and 2001 (unaudited), for the six months ended October 31, 2002
     and 2001 (unaudited) and from June 17, 1997 (inception) through
     October 31, 2002 (unaudited) .....................................     F-3

Statements of Cash  Flows for the six months  ended  October 31,
      2002 and 2001 (unaudited), and from June 17, 1997 (inception)
      through October 31, 2002 (unaudited) ............................     F-4

Notes to Financial Statements .........................................     F-5


<PAGE>

                           BIG CAT MINING CORPORATION
                         (An Exploration Stage Company)
                             Condensed Balance Sheet
                                October 31, 2002
                                   (Unaudited)

                                     Assets
Cash .....................................................      $  85,755
                                                                ---------

                                                                $  85,755
                                                                =========

                      Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Liabilities:
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities .............      $   2,866
                                                                ---------

                 Total liabilities .......................          2,866
                                                                ---------

Shareholders' equity:
    Common stock .........................................            111
    Additional paid-in capital ...........................        120,664
    Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage .....        (37,886)
                                                                ---------

                 Total shareholders' equity ..............         82,889
                                                                ---------

                                                                $  85,755
                                                                =========

            See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements

                                       F-2
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
                           BIG CAT MINING CORPORATION
                         (An Exploration Stage Company)
                       Condensed Statements of Operations
                                   (Unaudited)
<CAPTION>


                                                                                                               June 19, 1997
                                                         Three Months Ended          Six Months Ended          (inception)
                                                            October 31,                 October 31,              Through
                                                    --------------------------    --------------------------    October 31,
                                                       2002            2001          2002           2001           2002
                                                    -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------
<S>                                                 <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Costs and expenses:
    Contributed services (Note 2) ...............   $       400    $       700    $     2,200    $       700    $     5,250
    Contributed rent (Note 2) ...................           300            300            600            600          3,400
    Filing and transfer agent fees ..............          --             --             --              605            805
    Exploration costs ...........................          --             --            2,610           --            4,906
    Stock-based compensation - organization costs          --             --            2,559           --            2,609
    Office and miscellaneous ....................           588           --              659             14            924
    Consulting fees, related party (Note 2) .....         2,781           --            2,781           --            2,781
    Professional fees ...........................         3,084          2,375         13,680          2,387         17,211
                                                    -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

                   Loss before income taxes .....        (7,153)        (3,375)       (25,089)        (4,306)       (37,886)

    Income tax provision (Note 3) ...............          --             --             --             --             --
                                                    -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

                   Net loss .....................   $    (7,153)   $    (3,375)   $   (25,089)   $    (4,306)   $   (37,886)
                                                    ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

Basic and diluted loss per share ................   $     (0.01)   $     (0.01)   $     (0.02)   $     (0.01)
                                                    ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

Weighted average common shares outstanding ......     1,114,000        500,000      1,114,000        500,000
                                                    ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========
</TABLE>

            See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements

                                       F-3
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
                           BIG CAT MINING CORPORATION
                         (An Exploration Stage Company)
                       Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
                                   (Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
                                                                                        June 19, 1997
                                                                                         (inception)
                                                                 Six Months Ended          Through
                                                                   October 31,           October 31,
                                                              -----------------------
                                                                2002          2001           2002
                                                              ---------    ----------     ---------
<S>                                                           <C>          <C>            <C>
                    Net cash used in
                        operating activities ..............   $ (19,422)   $     (701)    $ (26,369)
                                                              ---------    ----------     ---------

Cash flows from financing activities:
    Expenses paid on behalf of the Company by related party        --            --             725
    Proceeds from the sale of common
       stock ..............................................        --            --         111,400
       (Increase) decrease in subscriptions receivable ....      32,300          --            --
                                                              ---------    ----------     ---------
                    Net cash provided by
                        financing activities ..............      32,300          --         112,125
                                                              ---------    ----------     ---------

                    Net change in cash and
                        cash equivalents ..................      12,878          (701)       85,756

Cash and cash equivalents:
    Beginning of period ...................................      72,878          --            --
                                                              ---------    ----------     ---------

    End of period .........................................   $  85,756    $     (701)    $  85,756
                                                              =========    ==========     =========

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
       Cash paid during the year for:
       Income taxes .......................................   $    --      $     --       $    --
                                                              =========    ==========     =========
       Interest ...........................................   $    --      $     --       $    --
                                                              =========    ==========     =========

Non-cash financing activities:
    Common shares issued (cancelled) for services (Note 3)    $    --      $     --       $    --
                                                              =========    ==========     =========
</TABLE>


            See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements

                                       F-4
<PAGE>


                         BIG CAT MINING CORPORATION
                         (An Exploration Stage Company)
                     Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
                                   (Unaudited)


Note 1:  Basis of presentation

The interim financial statements presented herein have been prepared pursuant to
the rules and  regulations of the Securities  and Exchange  Commission.  Certain
information and footnote  disclosures  normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles have been
condensed  or  omitted  pursuant  to such  rules and  regulations.  The  interim
financial  statements  should be read in conjunction  with the Company's  annual
financial  statements  for the year ended April 30, 2002,  notes and  accounting
policies thereto included in the Company's  Registration Statement on Form 10-SB
as filed with the SEC.

In the  opinion  of  management,  all  adjustments  (consisting  only of  normal
recurring  adjustments)  which are necessary to provide a fair  presentation  of
operating  results for the interim period  presented have been made. The results
of operations for the periods  presented are not  necessarily  indicative of the
results to be expected for the year.

Interim financial data presented herein are unaudited.

Note 2: Related Party

During the six months ended October 31, 2002, and 2001, and the period from July
1997  (inception)  through October 31, 2002, the Company paid $2,781,  $-0-, and
$-0-, respectively, to a related party for consulting administrative services.

During the six months ended October 31, 2002 and 2001,  and the period from July
1997  (inception)  through  October 31, 2002,  an affiliate  paid certain  costs
totaling $725, $-0- and $-0-, respectively,  on behalf of the Company. The costs
were charged to operations with a corresponding credit to paid-in capital.

Note 3: Income Tax

The Company  records its income taxes in accordance  with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". The Company incurred
net operating losses during the six months ended October 31, 2002 resulting in a
deferred tax asset, which was fully allowed for; therefore,  the net benefit and
expense resulted in $-0- income taxes.

                                       F-5
<PAGE>
                                        6


                               PLAN OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of the plan of operations of the Company should be read
in  conjunction  with the  financial  statements  and the related  notes thereto
included elsewhere in this quarterly report for the six months ended October 31,
2002. This quarterly report contains certain forward-looking  statements and the
Company's future operation  results could differ materially from those discussed
herein.

Management  of the Company will actively seek new investors to increase our cash
reserves  which will permit us to move into Phases 2 and 3 of our work  program.
These phases are described  under the subheading  "Recommended  Work Program" in
this Form 10QSB.

We do not  expect  any  significant  changes  in the  number  of our  employees.
Presently,  we are  fortunate to have the services of an  experienced  President
given our limited financial resources.  Our current management team will satisfy
our requirements for the foreseeable future.

We can satisfy our cash requirements for general,  administrative  and legal and
accounting  requirements for the next 12 months. However, we will be required to
raise approximately  $30,000 on or before March 1, 2003 to complete  exploration
expenditures  totaling  $50,000  under our  option  agreement.  The  independent
auditors report which accompanies our audited  financial  statements as at April
30, 2002 states that our company has no  established  revenues  and has incurred
net losses since  inception.  In the view of our  auditors,  these factors raise
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Technical Terms Glossary
------------------------

The following defined technical terms are used in our registration statement:

"214 +/-4 Ma on hornblende" means the age of the mineral hornblende expressed in
millions of years (214) before the present  time (Ma).  The range of accuracy is
present in +/- million years.

"acicularity"  means  the  degree of  needle-like  crystals  (i.e.  Wollastonite
crystals in this registration statement);

"Bowser  Group"  means  the  group  of rock  formations  that  comprise  a thick
assemblage of rocks known collectively as the Bowser Group;

"calcareous siltstone" means a fine-grained sandstone that contains some calcite
or dolomit;

"carbonatites" means a high-carbonate rock derived from hot magmatic fluid;

"clinopyroxene" means a collective name for the monoclinic pyroxenes;

"Coast Mountain Belt" means a belt of intrusive rocks that occurs near the coast
of British Columbia;

"comminution"  means the act of pulverization,  breaking crushing or grinding of
rock;

"coralline  reef  limestone"  means a reef limestone  composed mainly of organic
fossils

"diopside" means a calcite-magnesium silicate mineral;

"Early  Devonian"  means  the  oldest  part of the  Devonian  Period.  The Early
Devonian system of strata was deposited between 380 and 410 million years before
the present time;

<PAGE>
                                        7

"Early  Jurassic"  means  the  oldest  part of the  Jurassic  Period.  The Early
Jurassic system of strata was deposited between 160 and 210 million years before
the present time;

"elliptical  Zippa  Mountain  nepheline  syenite  pluton"  means an  oval-shaped
intrusion  of  coarse  grained   igneous  rock  in   intermediate   composition,
undersaturated  with respect to silica.  The Zippa  Mountain  pluton is the name
given to it by the geologists  who mapped the area for the Geological  Survey of
Canada;

"felsic volcanics" means a light colored volcanic rock;

"intercalated  mafic" means dark colored volcanic rocks that are  inter-fingered
with other rock types.

"Intermontain  Belt"  means  the  lengthy  belt  (just to the east of the  Coast
Plutonic  Complex) of the sedimentary and volcanic rocks,  which are intruded by
any intrusive rocks;

"Late  Triassic"  means  the  youngest  part of the  Triassic  Period.  The Late
Triassic system of strata was deposited between 210 and 220 million years before
the present time;

"Lewes River Groups" means an assemblage of  volcano-sedimentary  rocks that was
formally named by the  Geological  Survey of Canada for a type locality near the
Lewes River;

"lower greenschist" means a week type of regional metamorphism;

"magmatic  processes"  means any of the several forms of  emplacement of igneous
rocks;

"mafic gangue" means dark colored, undesired minerals within a mineral deposit;

"melasyenite"  means a dark colored  granular  intrusive rock composed mainly of
orthoclase;

"mesozoic" means the one of the eras of geologic time- it includes the Triassic,
Jurassic and Cretaceous periods;

"metasomatic  processes" means a process which occurs during replacement of rock
types,  Commonly related to the replacement of rocks which are temporally and/or
spatially related to intrusive rocks;

"Middle  Jurassic"  means the middle  part of the  Jurassic  Period.  The Middle
Jurassic system of strata was deposited between 150 and 160 million years before
the present time;

"Mount Raven diorite" means an intrusion of intermediate  composition,  which is
named for the nearby mountain;

"Paleozoic"  means the  rocks  that were laid  down  during  the  Paleozoic  Era
(between 67 and 507 million years ago);

"Permian" means the system of strata was deposited  during the Permian Period of
Geological  time scale - between  150 and 160 million  years  before the present
time;

"Permian - Middle  Triassic"  means the interval of time between the Permian and
Middle Triassic Periods of the geologic time scale;

<PAGE>
                                        8

"Photometric"  means a dust  sampling  method  in  which  samples  of  dust  are
collected  on filter paper and then placed in a photometer  (an  instrument  for
measuring  the  intensity  of light) to  determine  the  quantities  of  various
elements;

"pluton" means a body of igneous rock that has formed beneath the surface of the
earth by consolidation of magma;

"pyroxenite"   means  a  coarse-grained   igneous  rock  consisting  chiefly  of
pyroxenes;

"Seraphim  Mountain granite" means an intrusive rock consisting mainly of quartz
and feldspar, which is named after the nearby mountain;

"silanes" means a colorless spontaneously combustible flammable gas that is used
as a surface modifying agent in the plastics filler business;

"skarns" means rocks composed mainly of lime-bearing  silicates and derived from
nearly pure limestone and dolomite.  Skarns are commonly  related to the contact
metasomatic process around plutons;

"Spatsizi Groups" means a group of mainly volcanic rocks;

"Stikine Assemblage" means the assemblage of rocks that occur within the Stikine
Terrane  - one of  five  parallel,  northwest-southeast  trending  belts,  which
comprise  the  Canadian  Cordillera.  This belt of  Permian  to Middle  Jurassic
volcanic and sedimentary rocks defines assemblage.

"Stuhini"  means  Triassic age  sediments of the Stuhini  Group,  which occur in
northern British Columbia;

"syenite" means a granular igneous rock composed essentially of orthoclase;

"thermal   metamorphic"  means  the  process  by  which  rocks  are  altered  in
composition, texture and internal structure by heat;

"Triassic"  means the system of strata  that was  deposited  between 210 and 250
million years before the present time;

"wollastonite"   means  a  natural   calc-silicate  rock  found  in  metamorphic
assemblages. It is used in ceramics, plastics and insulating materials;

"zenoliths"  means a fragment of another rock of an earlier  solidified  rock of
the same mass enclosed in an igneous rock;

General Background on Wollastonite
----------------------------------

Wollastonite  is named after  William Hyde  Wollaston,  the English  chemist and
mineralogist who discovered it in the late 1700's.  It is a naturally  occurring
metasilicate,  CaSiO3,  which was first  mined in  California,  in the 1930's to
supply  material for a white mineral woll. It has a theoretical  composition  of
48.3% CaO and 51.7% SiO2,  but impurities  such as iron,  magnesium or manganese
may substitute for part of the calcium, thereby reducing it's whiteness.

The aspect  ratio  (length  to  diameter  ratio) of  wollastonite  particles  is
commonly  between  5:1 and 8:1  and  may be as  high  as 20:1  depending  on the
processing   techniques.   This  ratio  (acicularity)  is  important  in  filler
applications  as it has a mechanical  reinforcing  effect.  The  brightness  and
opacity of  wollastonite  reduce  pigment costs in filler  applications  and low

<PAGE>
                                        9

moisture and oil  absorption  allow high  loadings.  Wollastonite  is relatively
chemically  inert  and it has a low  solubility  in water but is  decomposed  by
concentrated  hydrochloric  acid. Some surface charge exists naturally on milled
particles  and this allows  surface  coating  which is important  in  specialist
filler applications.

World Production and Markets
----------------------------

Wollastonite  is  generally  found in two types of  deposits:  skarns  formed by
thermal  metamorphic  and  metasomatic  processes,  and  carbonatites  formed by
magmatic processes.

There  are  many  occurrences  of the  mineral  wollastonite,  but  deposits  of
sufficient  size  and  purity  to be  economically  viable  are  rare.  The main
producers are located in the United States,  Mexico,  China,  Finland and India.
World  wollastonite  production  capacity  is  estimated  at 700 kt,  with China
leading  world  production  at 38%,  followed by the US with 29%, and India with
15%.   Wollastonite   production  has  increased   markedly  since  1990,   when
approximately 270 kt was produced.  The two leading North American producers are
NYCO and R.T. Vanderbilt.  Total world wollastonite consumption was estimated at
to 800 kt in the year 2000.  Asia led the top  consumer  countries  followed  by
Europe, North America and Latin America.

Production capacity estimates have been taken from Roskill Information  Services
Reports.  Roskill  Information  Services Ltd. is an  internationally  recognized
mineral  research  company which produces  reports on several  mineral and metal
products each year. The Roskill Information  Services Reports include production
and consumption figures on a country by country and worldwide basis.

Chemical Markets
----------------

The largest chemical market is in ceramics,  especially in tiles, though also in
white ware. White ware is ceramics used for cooking and includes  casseroles and
baking dishes. The main reason for use is as a processing aid, in that it allows
the ceramic body to be  fast-fired.  This is a method of processing  that allows
the ceramic to be fired in hours rather than in days with  considerable  capital
and  operating  cost  savings.  Difficulties  are  encountered  doing  this with
non-wollastonite  bodies,  which contain volatiles and tend to bloat, blister or
delaminate; and due to sensitivity to thermal shock which causes breakage during
the fast  heating and cooling  cycles.  Wollastonite's  fibrous  form allows the
contained  volatiles to escape to the exterior,  and  reinforce  the body,  both
green and fired, and the glaze,  inhibiting cracking,  crazing and chipping; the
mineral has low heat  expansion  characteristics  which  overcome  cracking from
thermal shock.

Metallurgical   end-uses  are  the  second  largest,   consuming  19%  of  world
requirements. The largest sector is for use in casting powders in the continuous
casting of steel.  The powder  protects the surface of the steel from oxidation,
insulates it to keep it molten,  lubricates the mold, and absorbs impurities.  A
low grade of  wollastonite  is usable  as long as it is free  from  sulphur  and
phosphorus.

Some  wollastonite  has long been used as a component of mineral wool glass,  in
Finland, Mexico and previously California.

Physical Markets
----------------

These rely mainly on the acicularity of the wollastonite  crystal.  They include
asbestos-replacement markets and plastic fillers.

Plastics   end-uses   take  up  10%  of  the  world  usage.   The  products  are
sophisticated,   involving  special  processing,  such  as  special  methods  of
comminution and  classification  to produce high aspect ratio fibers and surface
treatments.  The main end-uses are in thermoplastics and in thermoset  polymers,
all mainly for automotive end-uses. The main uses in the automobile industry are
in the manufacture of fenders,  battery casings,  body trim and moulded interior
parts such as cup holders and side storage panels.

<PAGE>
                                       10

Wollastonite  is also used as a high  brightness  extender  pigment in coatings,
particularly exterior architectural coatings and anti-corrosive primers, however
current usage is small. The term "high brightness  extender  pigment" means that
the outer coating of the finish will retain its  brightness as the  wollastonite
additive decreases the moisture absorption which increases the stain resistance,
thereby extending the brightness over the life of the component.

North American Producers and Potential Producers
------------------------------------------------

There are three  main  North  American  wollastonite  producers  - Nyco and R.T.
Vanderbilt,  both in upstate New York,  plus  sporadic  production  by Pfizer in
California.  A deposit  at  Gilbert,  Nevada has been  under  investigation  for
several years, but now appears to be dormant.

In 1994,  Nyco  acquired  mineral  rights to the large  Pilares  deposit,  50 km
northwest  of the  city of  Hermosillo  in  Sonora,  northwest  Mexico  which is
currently in production. The property contains 1,150 acres of mineral rights and
1,950 acres of surface  rights.  There is virtually no overburden and the mining
operation is open pit. Reserves of 50 Mt of wollastonite, grading 60% or better,
have been delineated.

The ore is high grade and contains high aspect ratio  wollastonite,  which go to
plastics   end-users.   The  major   markets  are  in  ceramics,   coatings  and
metallurgical fluxes. It is estimated that Nyco spent US$100 million to open the
mine, flotation and processing plant with a capacity of 90 ktpy to 216 ktpy.

It is too early to say  whether  the Big Cat  wollastonite  product  will have a
market.  However,  based  on the  work  completed  to date it  appears  that the
specifications  for the  market  can be met  with the Big Cat  product.  Further
marketing  studies  will be required to determine  what  quantity of the Big Cat
product can be marketed and general terms for such products.

Mining and Processing
---------------------

The  following  sections are a brief  discussion on the mining,  processing  and
transportation  options  for the Big Cat  deposit.  The  review  is based on the
geological and metallurgical testwork completed to date.

Mining
------

The  Big  Cat  deposit  appears  amenable  to  open  pit  mining  methods  using
conventional truck and excavator techniques.

The  cut-off  grade,  ore/waste  ratios,  bench plans and pit design can only be
completed when further  drilling,  metallurgical  and geotechnical  testwork and
cost analyses have been completed.

In  general  terms for a mine in this  location  mine  production  would only be
performed during the summer months over a 90 day production  period,  limited by
the extent of snow melt at the beginning of the season and by the on set of snow
at the end of the  season.  Therefore  the mine fleet  would be  selected  for a
higher daily production rate than a year round operation.

The ore would be  stockpiled  at the mine site for onward  transport to the mill
facilities

Essentially,  mining  of this  deposit  would be  similar  to a small  quarrying
operation.  The equipment  would likely be a small tracked  hydraulic top hammer
drill, an excavator together with small (22 - 25 t) articulated mining trucks.

Support  equipment such as a bulldozer,  motor grader and water truck would also
be required. It is likely that mining would be a contract operation.

<PAGE>
                                       11

Mine waste could be stockpiled on the north side of the deposit.

Grade  control would  generally be by visible  methods.  Wollastonite  is easily
distinguishable  from the  surrounding  rock. In fact,  based on a review of the
drill core logs, the error in visual  estimate of the  wollastonite  content was
less than 5% for material grading higher than 60% wollastonite,  compared to the
assay results.

An on-site  laboratory  would also be used for grade  control  using  blast hole
samples.

Metallurgy
----------

In general,  there are two methods used for the processing of wollastonite;  the
wet method such as that used by Partek  Minerals in Finland,  and the dry method
used by Nyco Minerals in the USA.

The dry method involves  primary,  secondary and tertiary  crushing to less than
1.2 mm using jaw,  gyratory and roll crushers  respectively.  The crushed ore is
then   screened   into  various  size   fractions   which  are  passed   through
high-intensity  magnetic separators to remove garnet and diopside. The fractions
are blended  and ground  further  using  pebble and  attrition  mills to produce
wollastonite with aspect ratios of between 15:1 and 20:1.

In the wet processing  method,  the crushed  wollastonite  ore is separated from
limestone and  dark-coloured  waste rock by  photometric  sorting.  The ore that
passes this first stage is then crushed and ground  further to around 200 um and
treated by reverse  floatation.  Calcite is floated  from  wollastonite  and the
wollastonite is passed through wet high-intensity  magnetic separation to remove
iron oxides.  Final processing involves filtering,  drying and pebble milling to
the required product size.

Coated grades of wollastonite, particularly for use in plastics, are produced by
surface   treating   ground   material   with   chemical   coupling   agents  or
surface-modifiers.  The basic  function  of these  chemicals  is to  modify  the
surface of the filler particles so that they wet and disperse more readily,  but
more  significant  improvements can be achieved with agents that react with both
the resin and the filler to provide a good bond between the two. Coupling agents
are divided into three main categories; acids, silanes and titanates.

Big Cat Metallurgical Testwork
------------------------------

Metallurgical  testing of the Big Cat ores was completed  over an eighteen month
period in 1996-97,  at  International  Metallurgical  and  Engineering  (IME) to
develop a flowsheet for recovering a high-grade wollastonite product.

The testwork indicated that a high purity  wollastonite  product can be produced
from the Big Cat  wollastonite  ores using  only  classification  and  flotation
processes  to remove  calcite  and  mafic  gangue  minerals  after  grinding  to
approximately 80% passing 120 microns.

Grinding liberates the wollastonite from the gangue minerals  comprising largely
of calcite, clinopyroxene, garnet and silicate. Testwork established that slimes
removal is important for flotation efficiency and wollastonite product quality.

<PAGE>
                                       12

Flotation produces a high-grade  wollastonite product by rejecting the remaining
calcite,  garnet and  clinopyroxene.  An overall  concentrate  mass  recovery of
approximately 50% was achieved in the laboratory locked cycle flotation tests at
a wollastonite recovery of approximately 84% at a head grade of about 58% to 60%
wollastonite.

The process  operates at its natural  slightly  alkaline pH.  Preliminary  water
quality analysis of the reject stream did not indicate any deleterious elements.

The reject  solids,  comprising  the slimes and gangue  minerals had a very high
neutralization  potential,  primarily  due to the presence of  wollastonite  and
calcite.

Testwork  that  will  optimize  the fine  grinding  and  classification  circuit
configuration  equipment  selection and process  conditions would be part of the
next stage of work.

1996 Testwork
-------------

A number of drill hole samples were collected for the testwork.  Eight composite
samples covering various wollastonite grades were prepared for testwork using NQ
drill core samples from holes DDH-1 to DDH-4, as shown in Table 1.1.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

              Table 1.1 - Drill Hole Core Samples for Initial Work

------------------ --------------- ------------------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------------------
    Composite        Drill Hole         Depth at which        Weight (g)      Wollastonite      Weighted Average
       No.              No.          Sample is Taken (ft)                      Grade (%)         Grade (1) (%)
------------------ --------------- ------------------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------------------
<S>                <C>             <C>                       <C>            <C>               <C>
        1               DDH1            29.95 - 31.95             808            49.44
                                        31.95 - 33.95             708            33.41               52.12
                                        33.95 - 35.95             723            53.34
                                        35.95 - 37.95             854            69.14
------------------ --------------- ------------------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------------------
        2               DDH1            87.95 - 89.95             901            38.50               46.53
                                        89.95 - 91.95             950            59.14
                                        91.95 - 93.95           1,019            33.98
                                        93.95 - 95.95             848            56.00
------------------ --------------- ------------------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------------------
        3               DDH1           117.95 - 119.95            951            54.93               69.36
                                       119.95 - 121.95            800            58.49
                                       121.95 - 123.95          1,101            79.30
                                       123.95 - 125.95            849            82.87
------------------ --------------- ------------------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------------------
        4               DDH2            20.70 - 22.70           1,001              -                 68.27
                                        22.70 - 24.70             902            68.75
                                        24.70 - 26.70             652            80.20
                                        26.70 - 28.70           1,006            60.11
------------------ --------------- ------------------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------------------
        5               DDH3            16.10 - 18.10           1,076            42.49               39.66
                                        18.10 - 20.10           1,015            25.06
                                        20.10 - 22.10             863              -
                                        22.10 - 24.10             956            51.96
------------------ --------------- ------------------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------------------
        6               DDH3            52.10 - 54.10             798            72.64               64.28
                                        54.10 - 56.10           1,052            54.87
                                        56.10 - 58.10             950            75.75
                                        58.10 - 60.10             901            55.75
------------------ --------------- ------------------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------------------
        7               DDH4            16.20 - 18.20           1,009            40.30               45.17
                                        18.20 - 20.20           1,046            43.50
                                        20.20 - 22.20           1,035              -
                                        22.20 - 24.20           1,005            51.79
------------------ --------------- ------------------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------------------
        8               DDH4            56.20 - 58.20             956            72.68               66.62
                                        58.20 - 60.20             957            73.67
                                        60.20 - 62.20             852            78.59
                                        62.20 - 64.20           1,051            45.00
------------------ --------------- ------------------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------------------
</TABLE>

Note:  (1) Analysis by bulk chemical method.

<PAGE>
                                       13

The core was  delivered  to IME,  crushed to 25 mm, coned and  quartered.  These
composites were used in all the testwork.

Eight scoping tests were conducted using these composites.  Locked cycle testing
was  carried  out to  provide  data  that  would  better  estimate  the  mass of
wollastonite  concentrate produced from the ores. An overall composite sample of
the eight test composites was prepared and used for the six locked cycle tests.

1997 Testwork
-------------

Six further  locked  cycle test were  performed  using  samples from drill holes
number 27, 29, 30, 32 and 35.  Locked  cycle test No. 7 used a composite  of the
1997 program  material from drill holes No., 23 to 35. The table below lists the
weighted  average  head  grades for each  composite,  and the amount of material
taken from each section.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

           Table 1.2 - Drill Hole Core Samples for Subsequent Testwork

----------------------- --------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- ---------------------
    Composite No.          Drill Hole No.         Depth at Which              Weight (g)               Weighted
                                               Sample is Taken (ft)                                Average Grade(1)
                                                                                                         (%)
----------------------- --------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- ---------------------
<S>                     <C>                   <C>                      <C>                       <C>
        97-27                  DDH27              8.6 m - 108.6 m       500 g at 2 m intervals          58.28%
----------------------- --------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- ---------------------
        97-29                  DDH29             6.63 m - 96.63 m       500 g at 2 m intervals          48.76
----------------------- --------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- ---------------------
        97-30                  DDH30             8.12 m - 114.12 m      500 g at 2 m intervals          55.49
----------------------- --------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- ---------------------
        97-32                  DDH32              18.5 m - 28.5 m       500 g at 2 m intervals          47.12
                                                  44.7 m - 107.0 m
----------------------- --------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- ---------------------
        97-35                  DDH35             4.58 m - 74.58 m       500 g at 2 m intervals            Nd
----------------------- --------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- ---------------------
</TABLE>

Note:  (1) Analysis by bulk chemical method.

The samples were prepared according to the following procedure:

The  ground ore was  classified  in two  stages.  The mill  discharge  was first
screened at 297 microns to remove the coarse fraction, which was recycled to the
mill. The screen undersize in the initial  testwork was  subsequently  de-slimed
using a 37 micron screen before feeding the ore to flotation.  This testwork was
repeated with screening at 20 microns to lower the mass of wollastonite  lost in
the slimes.

After desliming,  the wollastonite  product was conditioned for five minutes and
then  floated  in a Denver  flotation  machine.  The ground  flotation  feed was
conditioned  for five  minutes,  then floated for two minutes in a rougher stage
and a total of eight minutes in three scavenger stages. The combined rougher and
scavenger froth,  containing the gangue,  was re-floated for four minutes in the
first cleaner stage and five minutes in the second cleaner stage.  The flotation
collectors  were added as water based  emulsions.  Frother was added neat to the
process.  Oleic acid was always added in stages to the process  rather than in a
single addition. The recovery results from the testwork are shown in Table 1.3.

<PAGE>
                                       14

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                    Table 1.3 - Wollastonite Recovery Results

--------------- --------------- ---------------- ----------------- ------------- --------------- ---------------
Composite       Testwork        Ore Grade        % Wollastonite       % Mass     % Wollastonite  %
                                % Wollastonite   Recovery Overall    Recovery    Lost in         Wollastonite
                                                                     Overall     Sliming         Lost in Gangue
--------------- --------------- ---------------- ----------------- ------------- --------------- ---------------
<S>             <C>             <C>              <C>                <C>          <C>             <C>
                     1996             55               81.8            45.0           7.7             10.5
                     1996             81               84.0            68.0           11.3            4.7
   Comp 27           1997             60               85.8            51.5           4.1             10.1
   Comp 29           1997             522              84.8            44.1           1.2             17.2
   Comp 30           1997             54               92.8            50.1           2.4             4.8
   Comp 32           1997             50               80.6            40.3           1.0             18.4
  1997 Comp          1997             50               77.8            58.9           5.0             17.2
--------------- --------------- ---------------- ----------------- ------------- --------------- ---------------
                Average, all         57.4              83.9            48.3           4.7             11.4
--------------- --------------- ---------------- ----------------- ------------- --------------- ---------------
                Average, 1997        53.2              84.4             45            2.7             12.9
--------------- --------------- ---------------- ----------------- ------------- --------------- ---------------
</TABLE>

The most significant  metallurgical  parameters  resulting from the testwork are
summarized as follows:

    Average mill head grade                          =        58.1% wollastonite
    Average concentrate mass recovery                =        50.5% of feed mass
    Average wollastonite recovery, approximate       =        84%
    Wollastonite losses (approximate)
             Gangue                                  =        10%
             Slimes                                  =        60%
    Grind size, P(80)                                =       120 microns
    Reagent addition,  oleic acid                    =       2,200 g/t
    Finished product size specifications:
             Grade 8                                 =        5 - 8 microns
             Grade 3                                 =        3 - 5 microns
             Grade 10                                =        20 - 30 microns
             Grade 100                               =        40 - 50 microns

Based on this program,  it appears that the wet grinding and flotation  recovery
method  would  be  well  suited  to the Big Cat  deposit.  However,  significant
additional testwork will be required to optimize this work and test the complete
ore body in terms of variability.

Other work will include dewatering testwork and water quality analysis.

Project Infrastructure
----------------------

One  of  the  critical   aspects  of  the  Big  Cat  development   will  be  the
infrastructure. This will include:

         -        Site Access
         -        Offices and Camp
         -        Water Supply
         -        Power Supply
         -        Sewage Disposal
         -        Fuel Storage

The location of the nearby Snip Mine and the existing Eskay Creek Mine road will
assist in this  development.  It is likely that a new road will be required from
the Bob Quinn  junction,  on the Eskay  Creek road,  to the mine site.  Based on
existing topographical maps, this road would be approximately 100 km.

The road design would be to the current British  Columbia Forest  Practices Code
and be similar to several mine site roads in north and central British Columbia.
This road would be used to transport  personnel and supplies to the site and for
transport of the wollastonite to the port of Stewart for onward shipping.

Power generation would be by diesel gensets.  Power requirements would be small,
likely in the 2-3 megawatt range.

Personnel  would stay at the site on a 2 or 4 week rotating shift basis,  and be
housed at a camp located at the site.

<PAGE>
                                       15

The operation would be typical of other northern  British Columbia mines such as
Eskay Creek, Snip and Golden Bear.

A second option would be to transport the whole ore from the mine to a treatment
facility at the Snip Mine.  The  wollastonite  product  could then be bagged and
shipped by hovercraft  from to Wrangell.  This is how the Snip mine operated and
the infrastructure for such an operation is still in place.

Recommended Work Program
------------------------

Our  consultants,  Downey  &  Associates,  concluded  that  the Big Cat  project
warrants further expenditure because:

The  review  agrees  with the  mineralized  material  calculation  completed  by
Whitegold.  Our consultants completed an independent  calculation of mineralized
material based on drill result data. Estimates indicate 1.2 million tones of ore
grading 62% wollastonite.

The contained  wollastonite  appears to be readily  recoverable  by standard wet
processing  methods,  at a recovery and  chemical and physical  grade that could
achieve market penetration.

The  project  location  is remote.  However it is  reasonably  close to existing
mining infrastructure and transport routes to assist in project development. The
project is "remote"  only in the sense that there is no existing  infrastructure
in the vicinity of the project.  A new road of approximately 70km in length will
be needed to access the existing mining infrastructure.

The current  drillhole  spacing  insufficient to support a feasibility study and
additional drilling will be required.

The  consultants  do not know of any social or  environmental  issues that could
jeopardize the project.

The  consultants  recommend  a four year,  three  phase  program  to  complete a
pre-feasibility  study  followed  by a detailed  feasibility  study.  All dollar
figures are U.S.

Phase 1.
--------

This phase would  commence in mid-2002  and be  completed by the end of February
2003.   This  work  would  include  a  marketing   study  and  some   additional
metallurgical  testwork.  The  marketing  study would allow us to determine  the
value ranges for the products  that could be produced  from the Big Cat deposit.
It would  also  help  predict  the  market  potential  and  growth  sectors  for
wollastonite.  This work would likely be completed by a  specialized  consulting
group or individual,  with specialized knowledge of the wollastonite market. The
estimate for this stage is $33,500.

Phase 1 work would  commence with the collection of ore samples from the project
for  metallurgical  test work. This work would be done to generally  confirm the
results of the test work  completed by IME so that the grade and recovery of the
wollastonite can be independently determined by us.

The test work would consist of flotation to determine  grade and recovery of the
product and optical  microscopy  to  determine  the aspect ratio of the product,
which is important in helping to determine potential markets and end users.

Based on the results of this test work the  marketing  study would be completed.
The marketing study would involve a consultant  with the relevant  experience in
the  wollastonite  market.  It will  include  current  research on the  existing
markets and supply and demand figures.  It would also include  discussions  with
potential  end users in areas such as the ceramics  industry and the  automobile
supply parts industry.

<PAGE>
                                       16

This study will also include data on pricing for the product.

The costs for this Phase are estimated as follows:

         Sample Collection (including travel)                    $1,600
         Metallurgical Test work                                 $8,500
         Marketing Study                                        $16,500
         Company General and Administrative                      $6,900
         Total                                                  $33,500

Phase 2.
--------

This phase would take  approximately  two years, at which time a pre-feasibility
would be completed. The work would include diamond drilling,  geotechnical work,
metallurgical and mineralogical testwork,  engineering studies and environmental
studies.

Expenditures of $300,000 are estimated to complete this work.

Phase 2 work will require  additional  drilling and test work. The drilling will
be of  sufficient  spacing so that ore resource  calculations  can be completed.
Concurrent with this will be the environmental baseline studies on the mine area
and the access road area.

Geotechnical work would include mapping of the rock types major structures.  All
drill core  would also be mapped  including  rock mass  classification  and rock
quality data.  This will allow  calculations  to be completed for pit slopes for
any proposed open pit mine.

The  metallurgical  work will include  comminution and grinding to determine the
optimal grind versus recovery relationship for the ore. Flotation test work will
also be  completed  including  locked  cycle  test work that will  model  actual
operating  conditions.  This test work will determine the best suite of reagents
for ore recovery as well as the grade and recovery of the product.

This work will also include  dewatering  test work which will determine the best
method of separating the moisture from the wollastonite  product.  Included will
be thickening test work and filtration test work. In general terms,  the optimal
moisture  will be in the 8-12%  range,  which  allows the  product to be shipped
without too much moisture but also prevents dusting.

Other work will include X-Ray Diffraction (XRF) test work to determine  impurity
levels in the product and further optical microscopy.

Engineering will  incorporate  preliminary mine planning and scheduling based on
the results of the drilling and the previous  stage  marketing  study.  The plan
would  include  bench levels,  equipment  selection  and waste dump  scheduling.
Preliminary  mine  capital and  operating  costs would also be  completed.  This
information would then be fed back to the geological  resource model for ongoing
reserve calculations.

The  pre-feasibility  study will include a basic process plant equipment  sizing
and plant  layout.  Project  infrastructure,  including  offices,  water and air
supply and power systems would also be sized. A key aspect of the infrastructure
design will be the access  road.  The studies  would  likely  indicate  the best
location  for the plant and thereby  allow  further  design of the access  road,
including route and alignment selection and stream crossings. Also included will
be hazard  assessment  for such issues as avalanche  hazards and  landslides  as
these are not uncommon in this area of Northern British Columbia.

<PAGE>
                                       17

Based on all of the above project  capital and operating costs to a 25% accuracy
would be completed followed by preliminary project economics.

The Estimated Costs for this Phase are:

         Drilling and Sampling                                  $73,500
         Geotechnical Work                                      $16,500
         Metallurgical Testwork                                 $30,000
         Preliminary Mine Design                                $16,500
         Engineering                                            $60,000
         Road Design                                            $13,500
         Environmental                                          $30,000
         Company General & Administrative                       $60,000
         Total                                                 $300,000

Phase 3.
--------

Phase 3 would  culminate in the completion of a bankable  feasibility  study and
would  take  an  additional  two  years  at an  estimated  cost  of  $2,333,000.
"Bankable"  means to a level of  detail  to  facilitate  lending  by  recognized
banking institutions.

It would include further diamond drilling,  geotechnical  testwork and drilling,
infrastructure and site selection,  transportation  studies,  geological reserve
calculations,  mine planning,  metallurgy and process  selection and capital and
operating cost estimates.  The environmental  work required to achieve a Project
Development certificate would also be completed during this phase.

The main aspect of this Phase 3 will be detailed  engineering and metallurgy and
will likely  require  taking a bulk  sample  from the site to complete  detailed
metallurgical studies.

Depending  on the  results of  drilling  from Phase 2, some  additional  in-fill
drilling  may be required  to ensure  sufficient  drill  density for ore reserve
calculations. Some additional drilling will be required on the proposed location
of the waste dumps to ensure that there is no potential to find  additional  ore
in this location. This is called "condemnation drilling".

A bulk sample  will also be taken at this time.  This sample will be selected by
an independent  qualified geologist based on the assay and sample results of the
drilling.  It may  consist  of a  single  bulk  sample  from one  location  or a
composite  from a number of  locations  in the  property.  The work will require
mobilization  of an excavator  and likely a helicopter to move the sample to the
Snip site for onward shipment to the test laboratory facility.

Test work would  include  final  testing of the ore using the bulk  sample.  The
results of this test work will also be used for the final marketing study.

Based on the above the  feasibility  study will be  completed.  The  feasibility
study  will  include  all  ore  reserve   calculations,   detailed  mine  design
incorporating  mine  scheduling,  bench sizes,  in-pit mine roads and mine fleet
equipment  selection.  This study will  include  final  process  site  location,
process plant design and associated infrastructure.  This work will be completed
by an independent  engineering  consulting  firm with  specialized  knowledge in
design of these types of process  plants.  All plant equipment will be sized and
selected based on the results of the metallurgical test work.

<PAGE>
                                       18

A detailed  access  road  design  will also be  completed,  to British  Columbia
Forestry  Practices code. The design will include detailed plans and sections of
sufficient detail to allow road construction to commence.

The Estimated costs for this phase are:

         Drilling                                             $30,000
         Bulk Sample                                         $550,000
         Metallurgical Testwork                               $80,000
         Geotechnical and Road Design                        $147,000
         Marketing                                            $50,000
         Feasibility Study including Engineering             $870,000
         Company General & Administrative                    $273,000
         Total                                             $2,000,000

The following  Table 1.4 shows a generalized  breakdown of the costs  associated
with Phases 1 to 3.

                          Table 1.4 - Estimated Budget

----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Project Management & Administration               $566,000
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Geology & Ore Reserves                            $866,000
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Geotechnical                                       $53,000
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Mining                                             $33,000
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Marketing                                          $67,000
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Metallurgy & Process Selection                    $153,000
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Infrastructure & Site Selection                   $166,000
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Project Evaluation & Feasibility                  $240,000
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Capital & Operating Costs                         $189,000
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Total                                           $2,333,000
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------

Item 3 - Controls and Procedures
--------------------------------

Our C.E.O.  and C.F.O.  have  concluded  that our controls and other  procedures
designed to ensure that information  required to be disclosed in reports that we
submit  under the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  is  recorded,  processed,
summarized and reported  within the time periods  specified in the  Commission's
rules and forms are effective, based upon their evaluation of these controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this Form 10-QSB.

There were no significant  changes in our internal  controls or in other factors
that could  significantly  affect those controls  subsequent to the date of this
evaluation,   including  any  corrective  actions  with  regard  to  significant
deficiencies and weaknesses.


                                     PART II
                                OTHER INFORMATION

<PAGE>
                                       19

Item 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

         None

Item 2   CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

         None

Item 3   DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

         None

Item 4   SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

         None

Item 5   OTHER INFORMATION

         None

Item 6   EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

         (a)   Exhibits

          *99.1  Certification of Disclosure by the Company's Chief Executive
                 Officer
          *99.2  Certification of Disclosure by the Company's Chief Financial
                 Officer

           99.3  Section 906 Certification


         (b)   Reports on Form 8-K

               None

*    Previously Filed



                                   SIGNATURES

In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.

                           BIG CAT MINING CORPORATION


Dated:  April 9, 2003               Per:    /s/ Michael Halvorson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Michael Halvorson,
                                            President, C.E.O. and Director