alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FMC NOVEMBER 2022 ACTIVITY REPORT STATEMENTS & ANNOUNCEMENTS Chris Hughey Named FMC General Counsel Phillip C. “Chris” Hughey has been hired as the General Counsel of the Federal Maritime Commission and appointed to be a member of the Senior Executive Service. Maffei Visits Bay Area for Congressional & Industry Meetings Chairman Daniel B. Maffei traveled ... Continue reading FMC NOVEMBER 2022 ACTIVITY REPORT
 Federal Maritime Commission


WordPress Embed
					HTML Embed Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
 <blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="b2sMlSX5Pw">FMC NOVEMBER 2022 ACTIVITY REPORT</blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="/fmc-november-2022-activity-report/embed/#?secret=b2sMlSX5Pw" width="600" height="400" title="“FMC NOVEMBER 2022 ACTIVITY REPORT” — Federal Maritime Commission" data-secret="b2sMlSX5Pw" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(c,l){"use strict";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display="none";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if("link"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement("a"),a=l.createElement("a"),s.href=r.getAttribute("src"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener("message",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),c.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),i=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute("data-secret")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+="#?secret="+r,t.setAttribute("data-secret",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:r},"*")}}}}(window,document);
</script> Copy and paste this code into your site to embed
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Issues Regulatory Reform Priorities Plan","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zomQNNY522\"><a href=\"\/commission-issues-regulatory-reform-priorities-plan\/\">Commission Issues Regulatory Reform Priorities Plan<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-issues-regulatory-reform-priorities-plan\/embed\/#?secret=zomQNNY522\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Issues Regulatory Reform Priorities Plan” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"zomQNNY522\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 31.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, James F. Carroll, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ichargeit, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



---

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date: April 16, 2007















/s/ James F. Carroll





James F. Carroll









Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of inVentiv Health, Inc. (“the Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eran Broshy, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to
      the
      best of my knowledge and belief, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August
              9,
              2006
            By:
            /s/ ERAN
              BROSHY**Eran
              Broshy******
            **Title Chief
              Executive Officer**












A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      inVentiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by inVentiv Health, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > News Articles > Industry Advisory – Requirement to File Timely and Accurate Service Contracts

Industry Advisory – Requirement to File Timely and Accurate Service Contracts


Posted on:


June 2, 2023 The Federal Maritime Commission reminds vessel-operating common carriers (VOCCs) they must file all service contracts and amendments to service contracts in the Commission’s SERVCON  system no later than thirty (30) days after the effective date. Failure to file service contracts in accordance with 46 CFR Part §530 could result in fines or other penalties. Filers must ensure that the effective date entered in SERVCON accurately reflects the effective date of the contract. Amendments to contracts must have prospective effect. Contracts must not make reference to terms that are not explicitly contained in the service contract, unless those terms are readily available to the parties and the Commission (46 CFR §530.8) For questions regarding service contracts, see Information on How to File Service Contracts or contact tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
 Industry Advisory  News Articles
 Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
November 18, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MARSHAUN ROBINSON, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00715-CV V.

TEXAS BOARD PARDONS AND PAROLES, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order 

signed by the court below on August 14, 2014. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Marshaun Robinson.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 4.68







FILE NOTE



Employee – Adam George



Date - 13/04/17



Base Pay Increase/Bonus and Removal of Allowances



Base Pay Increase to £273,881 per annum with effect
from 1/1/17.



Annual Bonus of £198,248 for 2016 paid with February
2017's pay.



GW Pension Contributions and Car Allowance
have been aggregated in to 2017 base pay.



|/s/
    Philippa Crompton      | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Philippa Crompton, HR Director | 
|                               | 
|Date - 13/04/17                | 



GW Pharmaceuticals plc Sovereign
House Histon Cambridge United Kingdom

Telephone: +44 (0)1223 266800 Facsimile: +44 (0)1223 235667 www.gwpharm.com

Company No. 4160917
Registered in England and Wales
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-13052

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

*936Zahra S. Karinshak, Phyllis Clerk, Tra-cia M. King, Lawrence R. Sommerfeld, Sally Yates, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert P. Marcovitch, Attorney at Law, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Juan Hernandez appeals his conviction for using a facility of interstate commerce with the intent that murder-for-hire be committed, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1958. Hernandez’s sole argument on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction.

“We review a district court’s denial of a motion for a judgment of acquittal *de novo.” United States v. DuBose,*598 F.3d 726, 729 (11th Cir.2010). “In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence underlying the conviction, we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, with all inferences and credibility choices drawn in the government’s favor.” *Id.*(citation omitted). In order to obtain a conviction under § 1958, “the government must prove that the defendant: (1) used or caused another to use any facility of interstate or foreign commerce; (2) with the intent that a murder be committed; (3) as consideration for a promise or agreement to pay anything of pecuniary value.” *United States v. Preacher,*631 F.3d 1201, 1203 (11th Cir.2011).

In this case, Hernandez used his cellular telephone to instruct an undercover officer — posing as a hired hit man — to kill another individual. After that telephone conversation, Hernandez also participated in several other similar in — person conversations, but his crime was complete after that first call. *Id.*at 1204 (“The first time that Preacher used his cell phone to communicate his desire that the victim be killed for money, he violated § 1958.”). Hernandez argues that he revoked his requisite intent by informing the undercover officers (posing as hit men) during their final meeting that he wanted them only to harm, but not kill, the individual. This argument, however, is squarely foreclosed by our decision in *Preacher,*decided after the briefing in this case was completed. In that case, we held that, “once the defendant uses an instrument of interstate commerce with the intent that a murder-for-hire be committed, the crime is completed,” and it therefore “can no longer be abandoned.” *Id.*at 1203-04. Thus, even assuming *arguendo*that Hernandez later sought to call off the hit, that would not render the evidence insufficient to support his conviction. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32


                           BIG CAT MINING CORPORATION
                              A Nevada Corporation

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Cat Mining Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Craig Christy,
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Phil Mudge, Chief Financial Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated December 15, 2004                /s/ Craig Christy
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Craig Christy,
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       /s/ Phil Mudge
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Phil Mudge,
                                       Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

GIANE K. SANTOS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D13-5566 ) FELIPE DOS SANTOS, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ ) Opinion filed May 6, 2015. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Christine Greider, Judge. Justin C. Carlin of Golden & La Neve, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.

James W. Chandler of Law Office of James W. Chandler, P.A., Naples, for Appellee.

KHOUZAM, Judge.

Giane K. Santos, the former wife, appeals the final judgment modifying the parenting and child support plans. We reverse the final judgme nt's modification of the child support plan because the trial court used outdated financ ial information from both the former wife and the former husband, Felipe Santos, in calcu lating the amount of child support. We affirm the remaining issue on appeal without comment.- 2 - The parties filed petitions to modify or clarify the child su pport plan. In support of their petitions, bot h parties filed updated financia l affidavits. However, in ruling on the petitions and calculating the amount of child sup port, it appears that the

trial court used the affidavits filed in connection with the or iginal dissolution instead of the updated affidavits filed with the modification petitions. The use of outdated financial information in calculating a ch ild support

award can constitute reversible error. See Mitchell v. Mitchel l, 841 So. 2d 564, 570 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ("Notwithstanding that Ms. Mitchell's income was rising at the time of the final hearing in 2000, the circuit court used her outdat ed 1999 gross income figure. This was error."); Hanley v. Hanley, 734 So. 2d 529, 5 30 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) ("In the final judgment, the trial court erroneously relied on the first outdated report and found that the wife earns approximately $3,012 per month instea d of the updated figure $4,118, arrived at in the supplemental report."). Here, the co urt erroneously used the affidavits filed in connection with the initial dissolution pro ceedings as opposed to the updated affidavits filed with the petitions. Therefore, we reverse the final judgment with respect to the child support

modification and remand for the trial court to reconsider the s upport award in light of the parties' updated financial information. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001088664
<NAME>                        CLEMENTS GOLDEN PHOENIX ENTERPRISES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              May-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jun-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Nov-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         15,200
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,200
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,350
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,980
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   15,200
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,350)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>