alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3433 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 308
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3433

                          [Report No. 111-158]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 14, 2009

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                             March 5, 2010

               Reported by Mrs. Boxer, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the North American Wetlands Conservation Act to establish 
requirements regarding payment of the non-Federal share of the costs of 
  wetlands conservation projects in Canada that are funded under that 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARE OF PROJECTS IN MEXICO AND 
              CANADA UNDER NORTH AMERICAN WETLANDS CONSERVATION ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 8(b)(3) of the North American Wetlands 
Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 4407(b)(3)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(3) The non-Federal share of the United States contribution to 
the costs of such projects may not be derived from Federal grant 
programs. In the case of a project carried out in Canada or Mexico, the 
non-Federal share of the costs of the project may include cash 
contributions from non-United States sources that are used to pay costs 
of the project. In the case of a project carried out in Canada, funds 
from Canadian sources may comprise up to 50 percent of the non-Federal 
share of the costs of the project.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
with respect to any approved and active wetlands conservation project 
(as that term is used in section 8(b)(1) of such Act) carried out with 
assistance provided under such Act, including such a project approved 
before the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                                       Calendar No. 308

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3433

                          [Report No. 111-158]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the North American Wetlands Conservation Act to establish 
requirements regarding payment of the non-Federal share of the costs of 
  wetlands conservation projects in Canada that are funded under that 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 5, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 US C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (the
"Registrant") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Oren Shirazi, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.

                                                  /s/ Oren Shirazi
                                                  ----------------
                                                  Oren Shirazi
                                                  Acting Chief Financial Officer

June 18, 2008

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
Presidential Documents

49275 

Federal Register 

Vol. 82, No. 205 

Wednesday, October 25, 2017 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of October 23, 2017 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the 

Democratic Republic of the Congo 

On October 27, 2006, by Executive Order 13413, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to the situation in, or in relation to, 

the Democratic Republic of the Congo and, pursuant to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706), ordered related 

measures blocking the property of certain persons contributing to the conflict 

in that country. The President took this action to deal with the unusual 

and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States constituted 

by the situation in, or in relation to, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 

which has been marked by widespread violence and atrocities and continues 

to threaten regional stability. The President took additional steps to address 

this national emergency in Executive Order 13671 of July 8, 2014. 

The situation in, or in relation to, the Democratic Republic of the Congo 

continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy 

of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared in 

Executive Order 13413 of October 27, 2006, as amended by Executive Order 

13671 of July 8, 2014, and the measures adopted to deal with that emergency, 

must continue in effect beyond October 27, 2017. Therefore, in accordance 

with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), 

I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to the 

situation in, or in relation to, the Democratic Republic of the Congo declared 

in Executive Order 13413, as amended by Executive Order 13671. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

October 23, 2017. 

[FR Doc. 2017–23324 

Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3295–F8–P 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PRES DOCSTrump.EPS</GPH>
#### David Eugene MUNDAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden David BALLARD, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-7276.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 7, 2013.

Decided: Dec. 4, 2013.

David Eugene Munday, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Goldberg, Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

*321Before WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Eugene Munday seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Munday has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### Billy Tirrell ADAMS, Appellant, v. Ray HOBBS, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections; John Byus, Medical Administrator, Arkansas Department of Corrections; Wendy Kelley, Deputy Director of Treatment, Arkansas Department of Corrections; Richard Clark, Dr., East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Charlotte Green, Infirmary Manager, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Appellees.

*158No. 10-2138.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 19, 2010.

Filed: Nov. 29, 2010.

Billy Tirrell Adams, Brickeys, AR, pro se.

Hester Irene Criswell, Attorney General’s Office, Little Rock, AR, Michelle Banks Odum, Humphries & Lewis, White Hall, AR, for Appellees.

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Inmate Billy Tirrell Adams appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We conclude that the claims against the Arkansas Department of Correction defendants were properly dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, *see King v. Iowa Dep’t of Corr.,*598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (8th Cir.) (de novo standard of review), ce*rt. denied,*— U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 499, 178 L.Ed.2d 296 (2010), but we modify the dismissal of those claims to be without prejudice, *see Calico Trailer Mfg. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am.,*155 F.3d 976, 978 (8th Cir.1998). As to the remaining claims against Charlotte Green and Dr. Richard Clark, we agree with the district court that Adams failed to create trialworthy issues. *See Davis v. Oregon County, Mo.,*607 F.3d 543, 548 (8th Cir.2010) (summary judgment standard of review); *see also Williams v. Jackson,*600 F.3d 1007, 1014 (8th Cir.2010) (deliberate indifference claim requires showing more than even gross negligence); *Buckley v. Barlow,*997 F.2d 494, 495 (8th Cir.1993) (per curiam) (failure to process grievances, without more, is not actionable under § 1983). To the extent Adams is arguing that summary judgment was premature and that the record established deliberate indifference by Dr. Joseph Hughes, Adams did not seek a continuance under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f) by filing an affidavit showing what facts further discovery might uncover, *see Ballard v. Heineman,*548 F.3d 1132, 1136-37 (8th Cir.2008), and he also did not seek leave to add Dr. Hughes as a defendant. Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Adams’s pending motion for appointment of counsel.

1

. The Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Requests Comments on Possible Changes to Regulations Governing Cruise Lines","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3ICWqU7vtr\"><a href=\"\/commission-requests-comments-on-possible-changes-to-regulations-governing-cruise-lines\/\">Commission Requests Comments on Possible Changes to Regulations Governing Cruise Lines<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-requests-comments-on-possible-changes-to-regulations-governing-cruise-lines\/embed\/#?secret=3ICWqU7vtr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Requests Comments on Possible Changes to Regulations Governing Cruise Lines” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"3ICWqU7vtr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Dye Represents the Federal Maritime Commission at the U.S.-Japan Maritime Bilateral Meeting in Washington, DC","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"KrwdcPfjCl\"><a href=\"\/dye-maritime-bilateral-dc\/\">Commissioner Dye Represents the Federal Maritime Commission at the U.S.-Japan Maritime Bilateral Meeting in Washington, DC<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/dye-maritime-bilateral-dc\/embed\/#?secret=KrwdcPfjCl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Dye Represents the Federal Maritime Commission at the U.S.-Japan Maritime Bilateral Meeting in Washington, DC” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"KrwdcPfjCl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EX-31
      Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications





I,
      Robert
      McGinnis, in my capacity as President of Greenwich Capital Acceptance,
      Inc.certify that:





1. I
      have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required
      to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K HarborView
      Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-CB1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");





2. Based
      on
      my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do not contain
      any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
      to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;





3. Based
      on
      my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
      to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included
      in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.
      Based
      on my knowledge and compliance statement required in this report
      under Item
      1123
      of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
      the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
      in all material respects; and





5. All
      of
      the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
      asset- backed
      securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
      servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report
      in
      accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18
      and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
      disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described
      in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In
      giving
      the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to
      me by
      the following unaffiliated parties: Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer,
      and The Bank of New York, as Trustee.







Dated:
      March 29, 2007





/s/ Robert
      McGinnis


Name:
      Robert McGinnis


Title:
      President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL18-18-000]

                    On October 19, 2017, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. EL18-18-000,                     *Midcontinent Indep. Sys. Operator, Inc.,*                     161 FERC 61,057 (2017) (October 2017 Order), pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation to examine the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO) Transmission Owners Agreement and any other Commission-jurisdictional MISO documents that must be revised to fully implement the refund commitment concerns identified in the Commission's July 21, 2016 order in Docket No. EL16-99-000 in                     *Ark. Elec. Coop. Corp.*                     v.                     *ALLETE, Inc.,*                     156 FERC 61,061 (2016). The October 2017 Order also consolidated Docket Nos. EL16-99-000 and EL18-18-000.                

                    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL18-18-000, established pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL18-18-000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 days of the date of issuance of the order.

      ( print page 49604)    
Dated: October 19, 2017.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-23296 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2798 

To provide for the withdrawal of the United States from the United Nations 

Framework Convention on Climate Change, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2021 

Mr. PERRY (for himself, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, 

Mrs. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mrs. BOEBERT, Mr. BUDD, 

Mr. BROOKS, Mr. BIGGS, and Mr. GOHMERT) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the withdrawal of the United States from 

the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate 

Change, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WITHDRAWAL OF THE UNITED STATES FROM 

4 THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVEN5 TION ON CLIMATE CHANGE. 

6 The President shall— 

7 (1) not later than 5 days after the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act, provide written notification to 

9 the Depository of the United Nations Framework 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2798 IH

1 Convention on Climate Change, done at Rio de Ja2 neiro, June 3–14, 1992, of the withdrawal of the 

3 United States from the Convention effective on the 

4 date that it is 1 year after the date of receipt by the 

5 Depository of such notification of withdrawal in ac6 cordance with Article 25 of the Convention; and 

7 (2) on the effective date described in this sec8 tion, withdraw the United States from the United 

9 Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 

10 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS. 

11 No funds authorized or appropriated by any Act may 

12 be used to support, directly or indirectly, any efforts on 

13 the part of any United States Government official to take 

14 steps to carry out the obligations of the United States 

15 under the United Nations Framework Convention on Cli16 mate Change on or after the effective date described in 

17 section 1. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS