alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner William P. Doyle votes to publically release FMC report on Rules, Rates, and Practices relating to Detention, Demurrage, and Free Time.","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"eyd0BQyYb2\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-william-p-doyle-votes-to-publically-release-fmc-report-on-rules-rates-and-practices-relating-to-detention-demurrage-and-free-time\/\">Commissioner William P. Doyle votes to publically release FMC report on Rules, Rates, and Practices relating to Detention, Demurrage, and Free Time.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-william-p-doyle-votes-to-publically-release-fmc-report-on-rules-rates-and-practices-relating-to-detention-demurrage-and-free-time\/embed\/#?secret=eyd0BQyYb2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner William P. Doyle votes to publically release FMC report on Rules, Rates, and Practices relating to Detention, Demurrage, and Free Time.” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"eyd0BQyYb2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Approves $2 Million Settlement Agreement with Hapag-Lloyd","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tyROD8SFGG\"><a href=\"\/fmc-approves-2-million-settlement-agreement-with-hapag-lloyd\/\">FMC Approves $2 Million Settlement Agreement with Hapag-Lloyd<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-approves-2-million-settlement-agreement-with-hapag-lloyd\/embed\/#?secret=tyROD8SFGG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Approves $2 Million Settlement Agreement with Hapag-Lloyd” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"tyROD8SFGG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 10185]

Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (“INA”), and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the designation of the aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the designation and that the national security of the United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation.

Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be maintained.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: October 11, 2017.

Rex W. Tillerson,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2017-23790 Filed 10-31-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------X

ROYMER TEJEDA, 

Petitioner, TRANSFER ORDER 

-against- 14-CV-822 (KAM) (LB) 

 

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., 

Respondent.

---------------------------------------------------------X

MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge:

On January 27, 2014, petitioner pro se Roymer Tejeda, who is currently incarcerated at the

Rivers Correctional Institution in Winton, North Carolina, commenced this action pursuant to 8

U.S.C. § 1503(a) seeking a declaration of his United States nationality in order to participate in

programs at Rivers Correctional Institution. By Order dated March 10, 2014, the Court granted

petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis and directed petitioner to file an affirmation within

30 days providing his residence before his incarceration. 

Actions brought under Section 1503(a) “shall be filed in the district court of the United States

for the district in which such person resides or claims a residence.” 8 U.S.C. § 1503(a). Residence

is defined as “the place of general abode,” and “the place of general abode of a person means his

principal, actual dwelling place in fact, without regard to intent.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(33) (emphasis

added). 

In his affirmation, petitioner alleged that, before his incarceration, he “was living in

Washington, D.C. from 2005 to 2009.” (Petitioner’s Affirmation at p.1.) Although petitioner also 

alleged that he planned to reside with his father in Brooklyn, New York, after his release in 2015,

petitioner’s intent to reside with his father is insufficient to establish his residence in Kings County
in order to allow this petition to proceed in this district court.

Pursuant to the venue provision governing this civil action, this action should be filed in the

judicial district where petitioner “resides or claims a residence.” See 28 U.S.C. § 1503(a). Here,

because petitioner affirmed that he resided in Washington, D.C., before his incarceration, this case

is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. See 28 U.S.C.

§1406(a) (district court may transfer case filed in the wrong district to any district in which it could

have been brought). The Court offers no opinion on the merits of the petition. That provision of

Rule 83.1 of the Local Rules of the Eastern District of New York which requires a seven-day delay

is waived. No summons shall issue from this Court. The clerk of court is respectfully requested

to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, mail a copy of

this order to plaintiff, note service on the docket, and close this case.

SO ORDERED.

 

 

______________/s/_____________________ Kiyo A. Matsumoto 

 United States District Judge

Dated: April 4, 2014

Brooklyn, New York

2
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 800 North Capitol Street, N.W. 

 Washington, DC 20573-0001

Phone: (202) 523-5725 

 Secretary@FMC.gov

October 28, 2022

Mr. Michael Symonanis

Acting Chair

National Shipper Advisory Committee

Dear Acting Chair Symonanis:

On behalf of the Federal Maritime Commission (Commission), this responds to Recommendation 2 

from the National Shipper Advisory Committee (NSAC) submitted on August 31, 2022. 

NSAC Recommendation 2: In accordance with Fact Finding 29 and the recently announced 

data collection initiative mandated by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act, we recommend the 

Federal Maritime Commission initiate the establishment of an Ocean Carrier Advisory 

Committee comprised of ocean container carriers serving the United States within one 

hundred twenty days (120) days.

Commission Response

Fact Finding Investigation 29 Final Report (Final Report) provides 12 final recommendations for 

potential Commission action.1 Recommendation No. 9 calls for a new National Seaport, Marine Terminal, and 

Ocean Carrier Advisory Committee. That advisory committee would provide advice to the Commission from 

the perspective of ports, marine terminal operators, and ocean common carriers.

The Commission will take the recommendation made by the Fact Finding Officer and the NSAC to 

establish a second advisory committee under advisement as it examines all recommendations from the Final 

Report for potential future actions. The Commission will provide an update to the NSAC if it takes any actions 

related to this recommendation. 

Thank you for sharing this recommendation of the NSAC. Per the requirements set forth in legislation 

establishing the NSAC, these recommendations will be published on the Commission website and will be 

submitted to the appropriate Congressional committees. Please direct any questions regarding this response to 

the NSAC Designated Federal Officer.

Sincerely,

William Cody

Secretary

1 Fact Finding Investigation 29 Final Report, Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the U.S. International Ocean Supply 

Chain: Stakeholder Engagement and Possible Violations of 46 U.S.C. 41102(c) at 37 (May 31, 2022), available at: 

https://www.fmc.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/FactFinding29FinalReport.pdf.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-164342) of
CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen Trust of our reports dated January 14, 2011, with respect to the financial
statements of CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen Trust, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen Trust, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
October 31, 2010.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|McLean, Virginia     
|January 14, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          21,242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,242
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       (57,462)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,242
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,518
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,621
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of PGT, Inc. (the Company) for the
annual period ended December 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rodney Hershberger, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jeffery T. Jackson, as
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 7, 2008



/s/ RODNEY HERSHBERGERRodney HershbergerPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ JEFFERY T. JACKSONJeffery T. JacksonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Table of Contents


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 of TAM S.A. (File No. 333-147020), TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A. (File No. 333-147020-01) and TAM Capital Inc. (File No. 333-147020-02), of our report dated June 29, 2010 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F of TAM S.A., TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A. and TAM Capital Inc. (together, TAM) for the year ended December 31, 2009. São Paulo, Brazil, June 29, 2010 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores IndependentesPricewaterhouseCoopers 
Auditores Independentes


---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: LEHIGH COUNTY CONSTABLES

PETITION OF: DENNIS C. HUBER AND

FREDERICK BAINHAUER, III :

:

:

:

: No. 43 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of June , 2018, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Robert Klein, President and Chief Executive Officer of Legacy Mining Ltd.,  a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 of Legacy Mining Ltd.;



2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14 and 15d - 14) for the registrant and we have:



a.      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b.      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within September 30, 2006 prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c.      presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a.      All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: November 16, 2007





/s/ Robert Klein

---------------

Robert Klein

President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7295

ALONZO KEY,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF; AIKEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; 

BADGE 450 PHILLIP S. MIANO; BADGE 545 MATHEW BARNWELL; 

BADGE 520 CPL SPANN; BADGE 159 CPL SMITH; CPL EAGERTON, 

Officers of Aiken Department of Public Safety,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(1:11-cv-01613-DCN-JRM)

Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 14, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alonzo Key, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alonzo Key seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing Defendants State of South Carolina and Aiken Police 

Department without prejudice from Key’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) 

proceeding. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over 

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory 

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). The order Key seeks to appeal is neither a final 

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We 

deny Key’s motion for a transcript at Government expense. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED