alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Life Exchange, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Dorr, Chief
      Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.










/s/
      David Dorr


David
      Dorr


Chief
      Executive Officer


Acting
      Chief Financial Officer





October
      2, 2007
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > About > Strategies, Budgets, Plans, and Reports > Service Contract Inventory Analysis

Service Contract Inventory Analysis The Federal Maritime Commission’s FY 2022 service contract inventory data is included in the government-wide inventory posted on www.acquisition.gov. The government-wide inventory can be filtered to display the inventory data for FMC.







Service Contract Inventory Analysis FY 2022 [PDF, 340 KB]



Service Contract Inventory Analysis FY 2020 [PDF, 133 KB]



Service Contract Inventory Analysis FY 2019 [PDF, 66 KB]



FY 2018 FMC Service Contract Inventory Analysis and FY 2019 Plan [PDF, 61.4 KB]



FY 2017 FMC Service Contract Inventory Analysis and FY 2018 Plan [PDF, 57.7 KB]



Download FY 2016 Government-wide Service Contract Inventory [XLSX, 19.9 KB]



Service Contract Inventory FY ’15 [PDF, 71.7 KB]



Service Contract Inventory FY ’14 [PDF, 274 KB]



Service Contract Inventory – Executive Summary FY ’15 [PDF, 65.9 KB]



Service Contract Inventory – Executive Summary FY ’14 [PDF, 170 KB]



Service Contract Inventory – Executive Summary FY ’13 [PDF, 42.8 KB]



Service Contract Inventory – Executive Summary FY ’12 [PDF, 45.4 KB]



Service Contract Inventory – Executive Summary FY ’11 [PDF, 27.3 KB] Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-3327

___________

David Williams, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

Scott Horner, Sgt., Varner Unit, ADC, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: April 13, 2012

Filed: April 17, 2012

___________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Inmate David Williams appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal without prejudice

of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. In his

action he raised claims that a correctional officer, Sergeant Scott Horner, retaliated

against him for filing grievances by issuing him a false disciplinary and by calling him

a snitch within earshot of other inmates.

1

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth

Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
This court reviews de novo the district court’s interpretation of the Prison

Litigation Reform Act’s (PLRA’s) administrative-exhaustion provision. See King v.

Iowa Dep’t of Corr., 598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (8th Cir. 2010). We conclude that dismissal

was proper, because Williams did not show that he administratively exhausted his

claims, or that prison officials kept him from exhausting. Williams filed an informal

resolution request (IRR) complaining of Horner’s retaliatory false disciplinary and

retaliatory snitch comment, the first step in the prison’s written grievance policy. The

IRR was returned to Williams unanswered. Williams thereafter failed to file a timely

formal grievance, the next grievance step, even though the grievance policy allowed

him to file the grievance if he did so within three days of the designated problem

solver’s failure to respond to the IRR. See King, 598 F.3d at 1053-54 (inmate must

complete administrative exhaustion process in accordance with applicable procedural

rules, including deadlines, as precondition to bringing suit in federal court; prison’s

requirements, not PLRA, define boundaries of proper exhaustion). We agree with the

court that Williams’s failure to exhaust is not excused due to his misunderstanding of

grievance policy on how to proceed following the return of an unanswered IRR, see

Lyon v. Vande Krol, 305 F.3d 806, 809 (8th Cir. 2002) (en banc) (PLRA’s exhaustion

provision does not permit court to consider inmate’s merely subjective beliefs, logical

or otherwise, in determining whether administrative remedies are available), and we

disagree with Williams that the policy failed adequately to apprise him of exhaustion

procedures; we also reject his argument that exhaustion is unavailable on claims of

retaliatory discipline, because the grievance policy in the record clearly provides

otherwise.

The dismissal without prejudice is affirmed.

______________________________

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 31, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 50444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Fire Protection Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 28, 2017, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Fire Protection 
Association (``NFPA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
additions or changes to its standards development activities. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, NFPA has updated 
the regulations governing its standards development process and related 
rules, guidelines and policies, established a Patent Policy and has 
provided an updated and current list of its standards developments 
activities, related technical committee and conformity assessment 
activities. Information concerning NFPA regulations, technical 
committees, current standards, standards development, conformity 
assessment activities and Patent Policy are publicly available at 
nfpa.org.
    On September 20, 2004, NFPA filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on October 21, 2004 (69 FR 61869).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-23687 Filed 10-30-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 343 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow volunteer firefighters 

a deduction for personal safety clothing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2009 

Mr. PLATTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow 

volunteer firefighters a deduction for personal safety clothing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Volunteer Firefighter 

5 Tax Relief Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR PERSONAL SAFETY CLOTHING OF 

7 VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part VII of subchapter B of chap9 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 

10 additional itemized deductions for individuals) is amended 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 343 IH

1 by redesignating section 224 as section 225 and by insert2 ing after section 223 the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 224. PERSONAL SAFETY CLOTHING OF VOLUNTEER 

4 FIREFIGHTERS. 

5 ‘‘In the case of an individual who is a volunteer with 

6 a volunteer fire department, there shall be allowed as a 

7 deduction an amount equal to the amount paid during the 

8 taxable year for personal safety clothing (including hel9 mets and boots) designed for use, and to be used by such 

10 individual, in performing fire fighting services for such de11 partment.’’. 

12 (b) DEDUCTION ALLOWED WHETHER OR NOT TAX13 PAYER ITEMIZES OTHER DEDUCTIONS.—Subsection (a) 

14 of section 62 of such Code is amended by inserting before 

15 the last sentence thereof the following new paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(22) PERSONAL SAFETY CLOTHING OF VOLUN17 TEER FIREFIGHTERS.—The deduction allowed by 

18 section 224.’’. 

19 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

20 for such part VII is amended by striking the last item 

21 and inserting the following: 

‘‘Sec. 224. Personal safety clothing of volunteer firefighters. 

‘‘Sec. 225. Cross reference.’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 343 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Carl Savoy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/csavoy\/","title":"Commission Meeting Scheduled for\u00a0April\u00a014, 2021\u00a0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"h4vj4TTZlI\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-april-14-2021\/\">Commission Meeting Scheduled for\u00a0April\u00a014, 2021\u00a0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-april-14-2021\/embed\/#?secret=h4vj4TTZlI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Scheduled for\u00a0April\u00a014, 2021\u00a0” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"h4vj4TTZlI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Carl Savoy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/csavoy\/","title":"Commission Grants Temporary Relief Requested by Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VCwoyplOA5\"><a href=\"\/commission-grants-temporary-relief-requested-by-expeditors-international-of-washington-inc\/\">Commission Grants Temporary Relief Requested by Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-grants-temporary-relief-requested-by-expeditors-international-of-washington-inc\/embed\/#?secret=VCwoyplOA5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Grants Temporary Relief Requested by Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"VCwoyplOA5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, George M.L. LaBranche, IV, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of LaBranche & Co Inc., hereby certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LaBranche & Co Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date:    August 9, 2004 |  | /s/GEORGE M. L. LABRANCHE, IV
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                        |  | Name:
Title:                 

2

---



QuickLinks
#### Eduardo MARTINEZ-HERRERA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-72358.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 2010.

Filed Nov. 17, 2010.

Kari Hong, Esq., Law Offices of Kari E. Hong, Portland, OR, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Office of the District Chief Counsel U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: PAEZ and BEA, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY, Senior District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Kevin Thomas Duffy, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Eduardo Martinez-Herrera (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of Guatemala who entered the United States without inspection in 1988, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying Petitioner a waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

We lack jurisdiction to review denial of Petitioner’s request for a waiver of inadmissibility under § 1182(h). Petitioner does not raise a cognizable legal or constitutional question as to the BIA’s denial of his waiver request. The BIA determined that Petitioner was statutorily eligible for § 1182(h) relief, but did not, in exercise of its discretion, grant § 1182(h) relief.

There is no merit to Petitioner’s contention that a finding of eligibility requires granting a waiver. § 1182(h) expressly states that the “Attorney General may, in his discretion,” grant a waiver to an eligible petitioner. Here, the BIA properly considered Petitioner’s lack of rehabilitation as one of many factors in determining that relief was not warranted. Because whether to grant § 1182(h) relief is a discretionary decision, we lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s decision. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); *Mejia v. Gonzales,*499 F.3d 991, 999 (9th Cir.2007).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
OrgNo OrgName Reason for Action License No. Termination Date Comments

028414 AAA INTER LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 028414NF 7/31/2023

029052 ASTRA STAR LOGISTICS LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 029052F 7/19/2023

026852 DOMA EXPORT COMPANY, LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 017131N 7/20/2023

029317 ELITE GLOBAL SHIPPING LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 029317NF 7/13/2023

028250 GLOBAL NOBLE LLC VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 028250F 7/3/2023

028369 GLORIA ODILE EDWARDS FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 028369F 7/29/2023

029316 GMA GLOGISTIX LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 029316F 7/21/2023

015798 J & J COURIER SERVICES, INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 015798N 7/13/2023

027215 J.E. VERNAZZA CORP FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 027215N 7/21/2023

025624 JT SHIPPING GROUP INC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 025624NF 7/13/2023

023579 M & D GLOBAL LOGISTICS, INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 023579F 7/12/2023 NVOCC 023579N STILL REMAINS ACTIVE

026080 MAZEH SHIPPING LINE COMPANY FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 026080N 7/16/2023

018332 PIONEER LOGISTICS, INC. VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 018332N 7/21/2023

008040 SIMS, WATERS & ASSOCIATES, INC. VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 003025NF 7/28/2023

028424 SINE TRADING INTERNATIONAL, LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 028424NF 7/27/2023

029149 SUNBIZ CARGO LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 029149F 7/9/2023 NVOCC 029149N REMAINS ACTIVE

025963 VTG TANKTAINER GMBH VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 015068N 7/12/2023

026081 XPRESS FREIGHT FORWARDING INC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 026081F 7/16/2023

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations & Surrenders

July 1, 2023 to July 31, 2023
**BF** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0712 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SUSAN LEE HINRICH HAYNAL,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 6 0 -day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including January 29, 2021 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 18 2020

11/18/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0712