alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ricky Willard LOWERY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN MCCORMICK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 10-6941.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 7, 2010.

Ricky Willard Lowery, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Samuel Creighton Waters, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Willard Lowery seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or -wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lowery has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### GERALD W. *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 31897)

Beach, Alvord and Dupont, Js.

Argued November 8, 2011

officially released January 24, 2012

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 18, 2022

No. 04-21-00559-CV

Alize Imari SMITH,

Appellant

v.

John Kenneth WILSON IV,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020EM502226

Honorable Nick Catoe Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In a regular appeal such as this one, a notice of appeal ordinarily is due within thirty (30) 

days after the judgment is signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. In this case, the trial court signed the 

judgment on November 9, 2021. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on 

December 9, 2021. See id. A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due to 

be filed on December 24, 2021. See id. R. 26.3. On December 16, 2021, appellant filed her 

notice of appeal. Although appellant filed a notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace period 

allowed by Rule 26.3, she did not file a motion for extension of time.

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good 

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day 

grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. 

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, 

the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a 

timely manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); see also Hone v. Hanafin, 104 

S.W.3d 884, 886–87 (Tex. 2003) (holding “a reasonable explanation” is any plausible statement 

of circumstances indicating that failure to timely file was not deliberate or intentional but was the 

result of inadvertence, mistake or mischance, and that “any conduct short of deliberate or 

intentional noncompliance qualifies as inadvertence, mistake or mischance”) (citation ommitted).

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant file, within ten days from the date of this order, 

a response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file a notice of appeal in a timely 
manner. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of April, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Voiceserve, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the for the year ended March 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Aron Sandler, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
                  The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
 (2)
                The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented.
 Dated: 
January 15, 2009
  By: /s/ Aron Sandler
 Aron
Sandler
 Chief
Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-4454.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 25, 2013.

Matthew Collin Joseph, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Courtney J. Bumpers, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Whitfield appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a forty-six-month sentence. Whitfield argues that the district court erred in concluding that he violated the terms of his supervised release by distributing marijuana. He contends that there was not a preponderance of the evidence demonstrating that the substance was marijuana, and even if it *201was marijuana, that Whitfield was involved in distribution, instead of mere possession.

We review for an abuse of discretion a district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a term of imprisonment. *United States v. Pregent,*190 F.3d 279, 282 (4th Cir.1999); *United States v. Copley,*978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir.1992). The district court need only find a violation of a condition of supervised release by a preponderance of the evidence. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (2012); *Copley,*978 F.2d at 831. In this case, we conclude that the revocation did not amount to an abuse of discretion, because Whitfield’s confession to distribution and possession of marijuana was corroborated by the evidence of distribution found at his house, including a digital scale and baggies. Although the substance found in Whitfield’s residence was not analyzed by a laboratory, the officers testified that, based on their experience and training, the substance looked and smelled like marijuana and was stored in a suspicious place in the kitchen. We therefore conclude that the court did not clearly err in finding a Class A felony.

We affirm the judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 31.2



Rule 13a-14(a)
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer



I, Charlie T. Lovering,
certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Congaree Bancshares, Inc. (this “Report”)
for the period ended December 31, 2015; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date:	April 20, 2016 | By:/s/ Charlie T. Lovering   
|-------------------- | -----------------------------
|                     | Charlie T. Lovering          
|                     | Chief Financial Officer      
|                     | (Principal Financial
Officer)
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form
  10-Q of EWRX Internet Systems for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, I,
  Jessica Q. Wang, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of EWRX Internet Systems hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
  adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
  of my knowledge and belief, that:

|1. | Such quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ending
        September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The information contained in such quarterly report of
        Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, fairly represents
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of EWRX Internet Systems.

Date: November 12, 2010

EWRX Internet Systems

By:    /s/ Jessica Q. Wang
         Jessica Q. Wang
         Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer

---
#### Kelly Monique CHERRY; Christopher Ingram; Jermaine Phillipe Mack; Winifred Devon Sweeney, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED, An Ohio Corporation, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 09-2237.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 8, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 18, 2010.

Alvin L. Pittman, Law Offices of Alvin L. Pittman, Los Angeles, California, for Appellants. Susan B. Molony, Alston & Bird, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Matthew J. Gilligan, Alston & Bird, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kelly Monique Cherry, Christopher Ingram, Jermaine Phillipe Mack, and Winifred Devon Sweeney appeal the district court’s order and judgment granting United Parcel Service, Inc.’s summary judgment motions on their North Carolina state law claims for defamation, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and willful or wanton conduct. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. *See Cherry v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.,*No. 5:07-cv-00403-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > News Articles > March 2024 Activity Report

March 2024 Activity Report


Posted on:


April 30, 2024 STATEMENTS & RELEASES FMC FY25 Congressional Budget Justification Released The Federal Maritime Commission has released its Fiscal Year 2025 Congressional Budget Justification. The document is available on the “Congressional Budget Reports” webpage. Mohammad “Ali” Usman Named Chief Information Officer Chairman Daniel B. Maffei today announced Mohammad “Ali” Usman has been hired as the Chief Information Officer (CIO) of the Federal Maritime Commission and appointed to be a member of the Senior Executive Service. February 2024 Activity Report COMPETITION & AGREEMENTS Maersk/APL Slot Exchange Agreement (No. 012307-008) The OCEAN Alliance Agreement (No. 012426-007) SSPL/NPDL Slot Charter Agreement (No. 201403-001) HMM Yang Ming PSX Space Charter Agreement (No. 201407-002) Agency Agreement (No. 201421) CMA CGM/COSCO Shipping/ONE Vessel Sharing Agreement (No. 201422) OTI LICENSING ACTIVITY Applications 66 Revocations 32 Please see the OTI License Status Changes webpage for additional information.
 Activity Report
 Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QO2 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
February 1, 2006,  and the Standard  Terms of Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of January 1, 2006 (as  amended  from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company,
LLC (formerly  Residential Funding  Corporation),  as master servicer,  and U.S.
Bank National Association, as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992, issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: October 24, 2017. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Valerie J. Best, Assistant Executive Secretary.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10529
The Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Argonia
Argonia
KS
10/13/2017


[FR Doc. 2017-23510 Filed 10-27-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 2- 11 72 9 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 1 :0 8- cr-2 03 67 -WPD-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us DONAVEO N LIGHTBOURN, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e So ut he rnDis tri ctof F lo rid a
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (No ve m be r 19 , 20 12 ) Befo re CARNES, BAR KETT andBLACK, Cir cu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM:

Case: 12-11729 Date Filed: 11/19/2012 Page: 1 of 2Don av eo n Li gh tb ou rn , pro ceed in g pr o s e , app eal s the di st ric t co urt’s d en ia l

of hi s m ot io n t o c orrecta cl eri cal erro r, pu rs ua ntto Fed eral Ru le of C riminal Pro cedur e 3 6. Lig htbo urn’s m ot io n ra is edsev eral subs ta nt iv e cl ai m s re la te d t o h is co nv ic ti on , in cl ud in g t ha t h e was in no cen t an d t ha t h is co nv ic ti on an d s en te nc e were n ul l an d v oi d. Lig htbo urn d idno t, h owe ve r, po in t t o a ny cleri cal erro rs in an y jud gm en t o r or de r. W e rev ie w th e d is tri ctco urt’s ap pl ic at io n o f Ru le 36 de no vo . Uni te d Sta tes v. Por ti ll o , 36 3 F .3d11 61 , 11 64 (11 th Cir . 20 04 ). Ru le 36 pro vi de s tha t a “ co urt m ay at a ny tim e co rrec t a c le ric al erro r in a jud gm en t, o rd er, o r ot he r part o f th e reco rd , or c orrectanerro r in th e rec or d a ris in g fr om ov ers ig htor o m is si on .” Fed . R. Cri m . P. 36 . Rul e 3 6 m ay no t b e u se d t o s ub st an ti ve ly alte r a cri m in al sen te nc e. Por ti ll o , 36 3 F .3dat 1 16 4. Bec au se all of t he arg um en ts inLig htbo urn’s m ot io n re qu es te d s ub st an ti ve ch an ge s t o h is co nv ic ti on an d s en te nc e, no ne was p ro pe rly bro ug htun de r Ru le 36 . Se e id. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm th e d is tri ctco urt’s d en ia l o f Lig htbo urn’s m ot io n to co rrec t. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-11729 Date Filed: 11/19/2012 Page: 2 of 2
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > About > Bureaus and Offices > Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services > Packing for an International Move

Packing for an International Move Protect your move by following these tips:



Do


Request professional packing services and confirm that items will be shrink wrapped and palleted when shipped.



Consult with the mover before shipping items such as an automobile or gas-powered appliances such as grills or lawnmowers; there are special rules that apply to transporting such items.



Ensure that outside items (e.g. bicycles, flower pots, etc.) are clean and free of dirt and/or insects.



Keep an inventory of all items included in the shipment (including receipts, photos, appraisals).



Ensure that the mover’s inventory clearly labels items (e.g. “Lladro figurine” not “generic glassware” ) and provides size, make, model, and serial number for larger items such as t.v.s, stereo and video systems, etc.



Ensure that the mover’s inventory and representation of the items’ condition is correct. If you disagree, discuss it with the mover and note it on the packing list.







Don’t


Ship valuable items such as cash, stock, bonds, jewelry, coins, and photo albums – these items should be carried on your person or in a suitcase



Add commercial items or newly purchased goods without checking with your mover



Include plants, seeds, pet food, pesticides, firearms, or meat products in your shipment



Sign a blank, incomplete, or illegible inventory packing list Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov