alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.0



List of Subsidiaries of the Company



|Subsidiaries                            |  | Shareholders                            |  | Ownership %
|--------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | -----------
|Business Objects Australia Pty Ltd.     |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Asia Pacific Pte Ltd.  |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Holding B.V.           |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Nihon B.V.             |  | Business Objects Holding B.V.           |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Nederland B.V.         |  | Business Objects Holding B.V.           |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Japan KK               |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects BeLux S.A./N.V         |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 99.96%     
|Business Objects Deutschland GmbH       |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Iberica S.L.           |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 99.98%     
|Business Objects Italia S.p.A           |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Nordic A.B.            |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Schweiz A.G            |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects (U.K.) Ltd.            |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Americas, Inc.         |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Canada, Inc.           |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Ithena U.K. Ltd.                        |  | Business Objects Americas, Inc.         |  | 100.00%    
|Set Analyzer Ltd.                       |  | Business Objects Americas, Inc.         |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Holding, Inc.          |  | Business Objects Americas, Inc.         |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Canada Co              |  | Business Objects Holding, Inc.          |  | 100.00%    
|Blue Edge Software Ltd.                 |  | Business Objects Americas, Inc.         |  | 100.00%    
|Alphadare Ltd.                          |  | Blue Edge Software Ltd.                 |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Brazil Ltda.           |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Greater China Ltd.     |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Business Objects Data Integration, Inc. |  | Business Objects S.A.                   |  | 100.00%    
|Acta Technology Ltd.                    |  | Business Objects Data Integration, Inc. |  | 100.00%    
|Acta Technology GmbH                    |  | Business Objects Data Integration, Inc. |  | 100.00%    
|Acta Benelux BV                         |  | Business Objects Data Integration, Inc. |  | 100.00%    
|Acta Technology AB                      |  | Business Objects Data Integration, Inc. |  | 100.00%
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Ensurapet, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) for the period ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, W.
Russell Smith, III, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.




/s/ W.
      RUSSELL SMITH, IIIW.
      Russell Smith, IIIPrincipal
      Accounting OfficerDecember
      19, 2008
----

| Subsidiaries’ or Affiliate’s Name                                              |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization |   | Percentage of Ownership                                   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| China Children Pharmaceuticals, Co., Ltd. (“China Children”)              |   | Hong Kong                                     |   | 100% by China Pediatric Pharmaceuticals, Inc.             |
| Xi’an Coova Children Pharmaceuticals  Co., Ltd. (“WFOE”)  |   | PRC                                           |   | 100% by China Children                                    |
| Shaanxi Jiali Pharmaceuticals, Co., Ltd.                                                   |   | PRC                                           |   | Controlled by WFOE through various contractual agreements |

----
#### Harvey YODER, doing business as Marketing Group, Plaintiff-Appellant v. US FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-10355.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 14, 2013.

William Kelly Puls, Puls & Liebrecht, P.C., Fort Worth, TX, Fred E. Stoops, Sr., Stoops & Lacourse, P.L.L.C., Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Jill Bohannon Davenport, John M. Barcus, Figari & Davenport, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before DAVIS, GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRMED. *See*5th Cir. R. 47.6.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Francesk UJKA, Elida Ujka, Dajana Ujka, Petitioners, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

No. 10-11239.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 20, 2011.

David H. Stoller, Stoller & Moreno, PA, Orlando, FL, for Petitioners.

Walter Bocchini, David Bernal, Lance L. Jolley, U.S. Department of Justice, Eric Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General’s Office, Washington, DC, Marion E. Guyton, U.S. Department of Justice, Columbia, MD, David Delgado, Office of Chief Counsel, Orlando, FL, for Respondent.

Before MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,* Judge.

*

 Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by *961designation.

*961PER CURIAM:

Francesk Ujka, Elida Ujka, and Dajana Ujka (collectively, “the Ujkas”) petition for review of the denial of their asylum applications.1 The Ujkas argue that the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) conclusion that the government showed changed country conditions is not supported by substantial evidence because the BIA improperly relied on State Department country reports. The Ujkas also argue that they are entitled to humanitarian asylum. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(1)(iii). After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we deny the Ujkas’ petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports both the BIA’s determination that the government showed changed country conditions and its conclusion that the Ujkas are not entitled to humanitarian asylum. First, the BIA’s reliance on State Department country reports was proper in this case because the BIA pointed to portions of those reports showing that local police — the source of the Ujkas’ past political persecution — were now under the control of the political party to which the Ujkas belong. As such, the BIA performed an “individualized analysis that foeuse[d] on the specific harm suffered and the relationship to it of the particular information contained in the relevant country reports.” *Imelda v. U.S. Att’y Gen.,*611 F.3d 724, 729 (11th Cir. 2010) (quotation marks omitted). Second, while we recognize that the Ujkas’ experience in Albania was horrific, humanitarian asylum “is reserved for the most extraordinary cases,” and we cannot say that the record before us compels the conclusion that the past persecution here rises to such a level that asylum must be granted even without a well-founded fear of future persecution. *Mehmeti v. U.S. Att’y Gen.,*572 F.3d 1196, 1200-01 (11th Cir.2009). For these reasons, we deny the Ujkas’ petition for review.

PETITION DENIED.

1

. The Ujkas were also denied withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act and relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. The Ujkas have abandoned these issues by not raising them in their brief to this Court. *See Sepulveda v. U.S. Att'y Gen.,*401 F.3d 1226, 1228 n. 2 (11th Cir.2005).
EXHIBIT 35.1

[BNY Mellon   Letterhead]

Statement of
Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.

I, James Hall, Vice President
of The Bank of New York Mellon, a New York corporation (the Trustee), states:

(a)
A review of the Trustees activities for the period of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the
Reporting Period) and of the Trustees performance under the PPLUS Trust Certificates Series RRD-1 by and
between Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc. (the Depositor) and the Trustee has been made under my supervision.

(b)
To the best of my knowledge and based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period for PPLUS Trust Certificates Series RRD-1.

|                         | The Bank of New York Mellon,  
      as Trustee            
|------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                         |                                                            
|Date:
February 28,  2017 | /s/ James Hall
      
      James Hall
      Vice President
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. McCutcheon, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey A. McCutcheon
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                     |  | Jeffrey A. McCutcheon                            
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                    |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be retained by
LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.1 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of TAM S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2009, as amended by this Amendment No.1 (the "Report"), I, DavidBarioni Neto, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

     (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: October 1, 2009 

By: /s/ David Barioni NetoDavid Barioni Neto Chief Executive Officer 

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioners Bentzel and Sola Urge Congressional Leaders to Address Port Terminal Needs During COVID-19 Crisis","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XO5V7P8Qop\"><a href=\"\/commissioners-bentzel-and-sola-urge-congressional-leaders-to-address-port-terminal-needs-during-covid-19-crisis\/\">Commissioners Bentzel and Sola Urge Congressional Leaders to Address Port Terminal Needs During COVID-19 Crisis<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioners-bentzel-and-sola-urge-congressional-leaders-to-address-port-terminal-needs-during-covid-19-crisis\/embed\/#?secret=XO5V7P8Qop\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioners Bentzel and Sola Urge Congressional Leaders to Address Port Terminal Needs During COVID-19 Crisis” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"XO5V7P8Qop\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**UNDER**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

|                                   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: May                10, 2006 |   | /s/                JOSEPH J. WALLACE                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                   |   | Joseph                J. Wallace                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|                                   |   | Chief                Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                   |   | A                signed original of this written statement required by Section 906                has been                provided to Collectors Universe, Inc. and will be retained by Collectors                Universe, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission                or                its staff upon request. |
EXHIBIT 32

CERTICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of Community Bancorp Inc. (the Company)
that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.



|                  |  |  |  |                                                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 9, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael J. Perdue                                  
|                  |  |  |  | Michael J. Perdue President and Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 9, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Pamela D. Maes                                     
|                  |  |  |  | Pamela D. Maes Senior Vice President, Controller       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Community Bancorp Inc. and will be retained by Community Bancorp
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.2 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of TAM S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Líbano Miranda Barroso, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

     (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: June 30, 2009 

By: /s/ Líbano Miranda BarrosoLíbano Miranda Barroso Chief Financial Officer 

126 

----
#### In the Matter of Liza Bear, Appellant, v New York City Loft Board et al., Respondents.

[608 NYS2d 468]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered October 29, 1992, which dismissed the proceeding brought by petitioner pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the January 30, 1992 determination of the New York City Loft Board denying petitioner’s application for coverage under article 7-C of the Multiple Dwelling Law, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

"[T]he construction given statutes and regulations by the agency responsible for their administration will, if not irrational or unreasonable, be upheld” *(Matter of Johnson v Joy,*48 NY2d 689, 691). In this case the Loft Board determination that petitioner’s unit did not qualify for coverage pursuant to Multiple Dwelling Law § 281 (4) was not arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion inasmuch as the statute, on its face, requires a showing that the unit in question was occupied for residential use on April 1, 1980 *(see, Laermer v New York City Loft Bd.,*184 AD2d 339, *lv denied*81 NY2d 701). While the Loft Board now acknowledges that petitioner is not precluded from seeking a special permit pursuant to Zoning Resolution § 74-782 in order to qualify under Multiple Dwelling Law § 281 (3), it had no statutory authority to grant petitioner’s *261application unless and until such permit had been obtained from the appropriate municipal authority *(cf., Matter of Vlachos v New York City Loft Bd.,*118 AD2d 378, 382). The petition, therefore, was properly dismissed. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ross, Asch, Rubin and Tom, JJ.