alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 31, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50487-50488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23624]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act that the Advisory Committee on 
Disability Compensation (Committee) will meet on December 5 and 6, 
2017. The Committee will meet at 1722 Eye Street NW., Washington, DC 
20006, in the third-floor training complex. The sessions are open to 
the public and will begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 4:30 p.m. EST each 
day.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on the maintenance and periodic readjustment of the VA Schedule 
for Rating Disabilities. The Committee is to assemble and review 
information relating to the nature and character of disabilities 
arising during service in the Armed Forces, provide an ongoing 
assessment of the effectiveness of the rating schedule, and give advice 
on the most appropriate means of responding to the needs of Veterans 
with service-connected disabilities.
    The Committee will receive briefings on issues related to 
compensation for Veterans and on other VA benefits programs. The 
Committee will allocate time for receiving public comments, which are 
limited to three minutes each. Individuals wishing to make oral 
statements before the Committee will be accommodated on a first-come, 
first-

[[Page 50488]]

served basis. Individuals who speak are invited to submit one-to-two 
page summaries of their comments at the time of the meeting for 
inclusion in the official meeting record.
    The public may submit written statements for the Committee's review 
to Stacy Boyd, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Benefits 
Administration, Compensation Service, Policy Staff (211A), 810 Vermont 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, or via email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#80d3f4e1e3f9aec2eff9e4c0f6e1aee7eff6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f1a285909288dfb39e8895b18790df969e87">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Because the meeting is being held in a government building, the 
screening process requires individuals to present a photographic 
identification at the Guard's desk. Due to an increase in security 
protocols, you should allow an additional 30 minutes before the meeting 
begins. Routine escort will be provided until 9:00 a.m. each day. Any 
member of the public wishing to attend the meeting or seeking 
additional information should email Stacy Boyd or call her at (202) 
461-9580.

    Dated: October 26, 2017.
Jelessa M. Burney,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-23624 Filed 10-30-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.6(d) 


FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT 

AGREEMENT 


          THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of this 13th day of April, 2007 to that certain AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of
May 15, 2002, as amended (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”), by and between CHARLES D. FRAZER (“Employee”) and JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. (“Employer”).


          FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Employer and Employee, being the sole parties to the Employment Agreement, hereby amend the Employment
Agreement as follows: 


          1. Subject to earlier termination otherwise set forth in the Employment Agreement, the last day of the Employment Period shall be January 31, 2009. 


          2. Effective March 4, 2007, Employee’s Base Salary shall be $260,000.00. 


          Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect according to its terms. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the
terms of the remainder of the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control and prevail. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have those respective meanings attributed to them in the Employment Agreement. This
Amendment shall hereafter be deemed a part of the Employment Agreement for all purposes. 


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 


JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. 

	By:	     /s/
    David E. Ullman                              
	 
  	      /s/
    Charles D. Frazer

	 	 David E. Ullman,
  	
CHARLES D. FRAZER
  
	 	 Executive Vice President – Chief Financial Officer
October 6, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RODNEY UNDERWOOD, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00422-CV V.

BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on January 23, 2015. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Rodney Underwood.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 10.2

                   ASIA MAGNESIUM OWNERSHIP TRANSFER AGREEMENT


Party A: Jiang Dong (Transferor)

Party B: CAPITAL ONE RESOURCE CO., LTD (Transferee)


   1. Party A shall transfer 100% shares of Asia Magnesium Co. Ltd to Party B at
      zero cost;

   2. After receiving 100% shares from Party A, Party B will issue and modify
      company policy and related agreements as necessary.

   3. Party B shall responsible for investing Shangxi Gu Country Jinwei
      Magnesium Corp., Ltd. on behalf of Asia Magnesium;

   4. Party A is entitled to his rights and liabilities in accordance to his
      investor shares (incl. debits and other fees);

   5. Party B should take all related credit, liability and expense of Asia
      Magnesium's after receiving 100% shares of Asia Magnesium;

   6. This agreement has three copies, one for each parties and the third one
      will be delivered to Hong Kong Registration Department.

   7. Closing shall occur on July 1, 2007


Party A: Jiang Dong (Transferor)

Signature: /s/ Jiang Dong
           --------------

Party B: CAPITAL ONE RESOURCE CO., LTD (Transferee)

Signature: /s/ Xiaowen Zhuang
           ------------------

Signed date:April 3, 2007
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 18

- 00329

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S .I. , H.I., and W.I., Children

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 01391

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

Because appellant is indigent, no costs of this appeal are assessed.

SIGNED October 17, 2 018.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Chairman Maffei and Commissioner Bentzel Tour the Port of New York and New Jersey, Meet with Stakeholders on Cargo Operations and FMC Enforcement Priorities","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"atWj0W6bJy\"><a href=\"\/chairman-maffei-and-commissioner-bentzel-tour-the-port-of-new-york-and-new-jersey-meet-with-stakeholders-on-cargo-operations-and-fmc-enforcement-priorities\/\">Chairman Maffei and Commissioner Bentzel Tour the Port of New York and New Jersey, Meet with Stakeholders on Cargo Operations and FMC Enforcement Priorities<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/chairman-maffei-and-commissioner-bentzel-tour-the-port-of-new-york-and-new-jersey-meet-with-stakeholders-on-cargo-operations-and-fmc-enforcement-priorities\/embed\/#?secret=atWj0W6bJy\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Chairman Maffei and Commissioner Bentzel Tour the Port of New York and New Jersey, Meet with Stakeholders on Cargo Operations and FMC Enforcement Priorities” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"atWj0W6bJy\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 50930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23887]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION


Projects Rescinded for Consumptive Uses of Water

AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists the approved by rule projects rescinded by 
the Susquehanna River Basin Commission during the period set forth in 
DATES.

DATES: September 1-30, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 North Front Street, 
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel, 
telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax: (717) 238-2436; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a606573666f784a7978686924646f7e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="59333620353c2b192a2b3b3a77373c2d">[email protected]</span></a>. Regular mail inquiries may be sent to the above 
address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice lists the projects, described 
below, being rescinded for the consumptive use of water pursuant to the 
Commission's approval by rule process set forth in 18 CFR 806.22(e) and 
Sec.  806.22(f) for the time period specified above:

Rescinded ABR Issued

1. Repsol Oil & Gas USA, LLC, Pad ID: RENNEKAMP (05 104) R, ABR-
201108044.R1, Pike Township, Bradford County, Pa.; Rescind Date: 
September 20, 2017.

    Authority: Pub. L. 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., 18 CFR parts 
806, 807, and 808.

    Dated: October 30, 2017.
Stephanie L. Richardson,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-23887 Filed 11-1-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7040-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Report of PharmaNet Development Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Hamill, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: May 8, 2008



| |                                                                                        
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ John P. Hamill*                                                                    
| | John P. Hamill                                                                         
| | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal 
Accounting Officer)



The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BAKOS, APPELLEE, v. INSURA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL.,

APPELLANTS. 

[Cite as Bakos v. Insura Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 

Certification of conflict dismissed for want of conflict within meaning of 

S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B). 

(No. 97-2431 — Submitted October 28, 1998 — Decided December 30, 1998.) 

CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 71949. 

__________________ 

 Peterson & Zelasko and Bradford D. Zelasko, for appellee. 

 McNeal, Schick, Archibald & Biro Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Ziegler, for 

appellant Insura Property & Casualty Insurance Company. 

 Weston Hurd Fallon Paisley & Howley L.L.P., John G. Farnan, Hilary S. 

Taylor and William H. Baughman, Jr., for appellant St. Paul Fire & Marine 

Insurance Company. 

__________________ 

 The cause is dismissed for want of conflict within the meaning of 

S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B). 

 MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER AND LUNDBERG 

STRATTON,JJ., CONCUR. 

 COOK,J., dissents. 

__________________ 

COOK, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the decision to dismiss this 

case as improvidently certified and, if addressing this case on the merits, would 

affirm the decision of the court of appeals.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2757 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2757

  To require the Natural Resources Conservation Service to review the 
  national conservation practice standards, taking into consideration 
               climate benefits, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2021

 Ms. Brownley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Natural Resources Conservation Service to review the 
  national conservation practice standards, taking into consideration 
               climate benefits, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Climate Agricultural Conservation 
Practices Act''.

SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF CLIMATE BENEFITS IN CONSERVATION PRACTICE 
              STANDARDS.

    Section 1242(h) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 
3842(h)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``1 year after 
                the date of enactment of the Agriculture Improvement 
                Act of 2018'' and inserting ``5 years after the date of 
                enactment of the Climate Agricultural Conservation 
                Practices Act'';
                    (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (C) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (D) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(E) evaluate the climate benefits of the 
                standards.'';
            (2) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ``conservation 
        innovations and'' and inserting ``climate benefits, 
        conservation innovations, and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Climate benefit defined.--In this subsection, the 
        term `climate benefit' means--
                    ``(A) a reduction in agricultural greenhouse gas 
                emissions;
                    ``(B) an increase in carbon sequestration; or
                    ``(C) mitigation against, or adaptation to, 
                increased weather volatility.''.
                                 <all>
```
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 112,037

In the Matter of E RIC M ICHAEL G AMBLE ,

Petitioner

.

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

On December 5, 2014
, this c ourt suspended the petitioner, Eric Michael
Gamble
, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 6 months

. See In re
Gamble
, 301 Kan. 13, 338 P.3d 576 (201 4 ). The court further ordered that the petitioner undergo a hearing, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 219 (20 15 Kan. Ct.
R. Annot. 403 ), prior to consideration of a petition for reinstateme nt.

On November 24, 2015, petitioner fil ed a motion for reinstatement. On December 7, 2015
, t he court referred the petition to the Disciplinary Administrator for investigation and hearing. On June 9 , 2016, a hearing panel of the Kansas Board for Disciplin e of Attorneys conducted a hearing to consider the petitioner ' s petition for reinstatement.

On August 9 , 2016, the hearing panel filed its report setting out the circumstances leading to the petitioner ' s suspension, a summary of the evidence presented, and its findings and recommendations. The panel unanimously
recommended that the petitioner ' s petition for reinstatement of h is license to practice law in Kansas be granted

.

The court , after carefully considering the record, accepts the findings and

reco mmendations of the hearing panel and grants the petitioner ' s petition for
reinstatement of h is license to practice law in Kansas

.2

I T I S T HEREFORE O RDERED th at the petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law in Kansas conditioned upon his compliance with the annual continuing legal education requirements and upon h is payment of all fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education
Commission

. Upon proof provided to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts that the petitioner has complied with the annual continuing legal education requirements and has paid the fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission, the Clerk is directed to enter the petitioner ' s name u pon the roster of attorneys engaged in the practice of law in
Kansas.

I T I S F URTHER O RDERED that this order be pu blished in the official Kansas
R eports and that the costs herein be assessed to the petitioner.

I T I S S O O RDERED

.

Effective this 21st day of October
, 201 6

.
# OTI Archives - Federal Maritime Commission

- Commission Advisory Regarding Red Sea Surcharges Posted&#160;January 12, 2024 The Commission recognizes that the threat to commercial shipping imposes costs on the maritime transportation industry. The FMC has announced a hearing to explore Red Sea shipping issues. Under statutory authority, the Commission and its staff are closely monitoring rates, charges, and rules that common carriers have implemented as a result of the&#160;threats [&#8230;]The post Commission Advisory Regarding Red Sea Surcharges appeared first on Federal Maritime Commission.
- Industry Advisory – Names of Non-Compliant NVOCCs Posted to FMC Website Posted&#160;August 31, 2023 The Federal Maritime Commission will begin posting the names of&#160;Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carriers (NVOCCs) that do not publish a tariff, contrary to Commission regulations (46 C.F.R. §520.3(a)). The public is advised that the NVOCCs listed are at risk of the Commission taking steps to revoke the license or terminate the registration of these [&#8230;]The post Industry Advisory – Names of Non-Compliant NVOCCs Posted to FMC Website appeared first on Federal Maritime Commission.
- Industry Advisory — Requirements for Doing Business with NVOCCs and OFFs The Federal Maritime Commission reminds Common Carriers, including Vessel-Operating Common Carriers (VOCCs), they must meet their compliance obligations when doing business with Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carriers (NVOCCs) and Ocean Freight Forwarders (OFFs). Common Carriers must verify NVOCCs and OFFs are compliant with all applicable regulatory and statutory requirements related to licensing, registration, tariffs, and financial responsibility [&#8230;]The post Industry Advisory — Requirements for Doing Business with NVOCCs and OFFs appeared first on Federal Maritime Commission.
- Industry Advisory—Requirement to Maintain Accurate Information on FMC Form FMC-1 The Federal Maritime Commission reminds common carriers and marine terminal operators they must maintain an accurate&#160;Common Carrier Tariff and MTO Schedule Registration Form (FMC-1). Any changes to information submitted through the FMC-1 must immediately be sent to the Commission. Existing filers should review information previously submitted to the Commission to confirm it remains accurate. Failing [&#8230;]The post Industry Advisory—Requirement to Maintain Accurate Information on FMC Form FMC-1 appeared first on Federal Maritime Commission.