alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER WATTS, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 229 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Emmett Madison GRAHAM, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.

No. 10-7109.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 1, 2010.

Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for correction/reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) or Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (permitting the court to reduce a sentence “in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.)” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EX-35 (e)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 12, 2007

Ace Securities Corporation
AMACAR GROUP
6525 Morrison Boulevard, Suite 318
Charlotte, NC 28211

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan
    Trust, Series 2006-HE1

Per Section 4.15 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 2/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:


(A)     A review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year
        or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement,
        or such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer
        or Servicing Function Participant, has been made under such officer's
        supervision.

(B)     To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer or
        Servicing Function Participant, in all material respects throughout such
        year or portion thereof, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any
        such obligation in any material respect, specifying each such failure
        known to such officer and the nature and status thereof.

(C)     Notwithstanding anything herein to contrary (and noting that, to the
        extent of any inconsistency, any and all other statements,
        certifications or assertions herein are subject to the following):
        instances of noncompliance related to the subject transaction for the
        applicable reporting period are identified on Schedule A hereto.


Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary


(page)


Schedule A


Payment/Distribution Calculation Errors

During the reporting period, certain errors were made in connection with the
calculation of payments/distributions on the securities. To the best of the
signing officer's knowledge, each such error, which may or may not have been
material, has been identified and remedied and any related corrective action has
been disclosed in a report previously filed with the SEC in respect of the
reporting period.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

May 13, 2005

Mr. Grant Parker Harpold

Hargis & Harpold, L.L.P.

2 Riverway, Suite 1020

Houston, TX 77056

Mr. Kevin McEvily

McEvily & Flowers

1415 Louisiana, Suite 3200

Houston, TX 77002

RE:Case Number:  03-0794

Court of Appeals Number:  01-02-00084-CV

Trial Court Number:  98-13492

Style:CHON TRI A/K/A HIEN DINH NGUYEN AND THERAVADA BUDDHIST CORPORATION

v.

J.T.T. AND M.T.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  (Justice Brister and Justice Johnson not sitting)

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 03-0794Page 1**
#### Sylvester E. HARDING, III, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Captain R. ROUSH; Lieutenant D. Bullard; Clayton Richard, U.S. Supreme Court; Officer A. Brown; Billy West, Cumberland County District Attorney; Robbie Dick; Claire Hill, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-7390.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

Sylvester E. Harding, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sylvester E. Harding, III, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action without prejudice * pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012) for failure to state a claim, and its order denying his motion for reconsideration and various related post-judgment motions. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Harding’s informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s dispositions, Harding has forfeited appellate review of the court’s orders. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment and post-judgment order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 Based on the district judge’s opinion, we conclude that the dismissal was without prejudice, despite a statement to the contrary in the court’s text order denying reconsideration. Although dismissals without prejudice generally are interlocutory and not appeal-able, here the court's order of dismissal is a final one, as the grounds for dismissal indicate that Harding could not "save his action by merely amending his complaint.” *Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3553 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3553

   To exclude from consideration as income under the Native American 
Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 amounts received 
by a family from the Department of Veterans Affairs for service-related 
                disabilities of a member of the family.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 10, 2009

 Mrs. Kirkpatrick of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To exclude from consideration as income under the Native American 
Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 amounts received 
by a family from the Department of Veterans Affairs for service-related 
                disabilities of a member of the family.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Indian Veterans Housing Opportunity 
Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM INCOME.

    Paragraph (9) of section 4 of the Native American Housing 
Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4103(9)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Any amounts received by any member of the 
                family as disability compensation under chapter 11 of 
                title 38, United States Code, or dependency and 
                indemnity compensation under chapter 13 of such 
                title.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Lars H. Johnson, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Cascade Financial Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
 a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

   a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

   b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

   c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is likely to affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

   a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

   b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  March 11, 2005                                  /s/ Lars H. Johnson
                                                       -------------------
                                                       Lars H. Johnson,
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### William G. COOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David R. BLUMBERG, Chairman of Maryland Parole Commission; Nwachukwa, Parole Agent; Sabastine Nwagbara, Parole Agent, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-6943.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 25, 2013.

William Gregory Cook, Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William G. Cook appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Cook v. Blumberg,*No. 8:13-cv-01495-PJM (D. Md. filed May 30, 2013 & entered May 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are *220adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RICHARD BARNES, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D21-3089

LT Case No. 2014-CF-157

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed January 31, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Seminole County, 

Melissa Souto, Judge. 

Richard Barnes, Daytona Beach, 

Pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of inVentiv Health, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David S. Bassin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date May 10, 2010
By:
/s/ DAVID S. BASSINName David S. BassinTitle Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to inVentiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by inVentiv Health, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Amendment to
PRICESTER.COM, INC. 2007 STOCK OPTION PLAN,
DATED January 10, 2007


Pursuant to a meeting of the directors of Pricester.com, Inc. on April
18, 2007, Section 6 of the Pricester.com, Inc. Stock Option Plan dated
January 10, 2007 shall be revised to read as follows:

TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

The total number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance
by the Company either directly or underlying Options granted
under this Plan shall not be more than 2,000,000,000.  The total
number of shares of Common Stock reserved for such issuance may
be increased only by a resolution adopted by the Board of
Directors and amendment of the Plan.  Such Common Stock may be
authorized and unissued or reacquired common stock of the
Company.


The terms and provisions of the amendment of this Plan shall be binding
upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, each Participant, his
executives or administrators, heirs, and personal and legal
representatives.

         Dated the 18th day of April 2007.

                                        Pricester.com, Inc.

                                        By: /s/Joe Puentes
                                            --------------------------
                                            Joe Puentes, President
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Hacker, Johnson & Smith PA

Alarion Financial Services, Inc.

Ocala, Florida

We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated March 1, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Alarion Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005, and for the period from February 19, 2004 (date of organization) to December 31, 2004, in the Companys 2005 annual report on Form 10-KSB/A.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Hacker, Johnson & Smith PA
|Hacker, Johnson & Smith PA    
|Orlando, Florida              
|July 17, 2006
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 348 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to complete a special resource study 

to determine the suitability and feasibility of adding the birthplace site 

to the Harry S Truman National Historic Site or designating the site 

as a separate unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2009 

Mr. SKELTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to complete a special 

resource study to determine the suitability and feasibility 

of adding the birthplace site to the Harry S Truman 

National Historic Site or designating the site as a separate unit of the National Park System, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Harry S Truman 

5 Birthplace Study Act’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 348 IH

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall complete a 

3 special resource study of the Harry S Truman Birthplace 

4 State Historic Site in Lamar, Missouri, to determine— 

5 (1) the suitability and feasibility of adding the 

6 birthplace site to the Harry S Truman National His7 toric Site or designating the site as a separate unit 

8 of the National Park System; and 

9 (2) the methods and means for the protection 

10 and interpretation of the Harry S Truman Birth11 place State Historic Site by the National Park Serv12 ice, other Federal, State, or local government enti13 ties or private or nonprofit organizations. 

14 (b) STUDY REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary shall 

15 conduct the study in accordance with section 8(c) of Pub16 lic Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)). 

17 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

18 on which funds are made available to carry out this Act, 

19 the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural 

20 Resources of the House of Representatives and the Com21 mittee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate 

22 a report containing— 

23 (1) the results of the study; and 

24 (2) any recommendations of the Secretary. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the annual report of AGR Tools, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  February 16, 2010


By: /s/ Michael Killman
 Michael Killman
 Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3509 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3509

 To reauthorize State agricultural mediation programs under title V of 
                  the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2009

 Mr. Peterson (for himself, Mr. Lucas, Mr. Holden, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. 
Ellsworth, Mr. Moran of Kansas, Mr. Boswell, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. 
Kratovil, Ms. Markey of Colorado, Mr. Conaway, Ms. Jenkins, Mr. Murphy 
 of New York, Mr. Kissell, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Ms. Herseth Sandlin, 
  Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Welch, Mr. Massa, Mr. Bright, Mr. Pomeroy, and Mr. 
  Childers) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize State agricultural mediation programs under title V of 
                  the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agricultural Credit Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 506 of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (7 U.S.C. 5106) 
is amended by striking ``2010'' and inserting ``2015''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1290

WILLARD R. MEADOWS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SCARLETT RATCLIFFE, Clerk of Court of Giles

County; RANDY CARGILL, Attorney; DAVID

MULLINS, Attorney; CLIFFORD JOHNSON; WILLIAM

SMITH; LEONARD STEVE SONGER; BARBARA LEE

MCGUIRE; ALBERT MCGUIRE; RANDALL DUNCAN,

Esquire, The Commonwealth Attorney; WILLIS

WOODS, The Honorable Retired Judge (Deceased),

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-99-624-R)

Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Willard R. Meadows, Appellant Pro Se. Robert F. Rider, RIDER,

THOMAS, CLEAVELAND, FERRIS & EAKIN, Roanoke, Virginia; Randy Virlin

Cargill, MAGEE, FOSTER, GOLDSTEIN & SAYERS, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia; David Mullins, Blacksburg, Virginia; Max Jenkins, JENKINS &

QUIGLEY, Radford, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Willard Russell Meadows appeals from the district court’s

orders denying his two Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motions seeking reconsideration of the court’s prior orders dismissing his complaint

filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s orders and find no abuse of

discretion. See In re Burnley, 988 F.2d 1, 3 (4th Cir. 1992).

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Meadows v. Ratcliffe, No. CA-99-624-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 30 & Feb. 12,

2001). We deny the motion for oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED