alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Newtown Lane Marketing, Incorporated (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Arnold P. Kling,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
 and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 26, 2009

|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Arnold P. Kling           
|                              
|Arnold P. Kling               
|President                     
|(Principal Executive
 Officer)

A signed original of this
certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
STRATS Trust For Procter & Gamble Securities, Series 2006-1 - 10-K

Exhibit
31.1



CERTIFICATION



I,
Barbara Garafalo, certify that:



1.       I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of STRATS Trust For Procter & Gamble Securities, Series 2006-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2.       Based
on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.       Based
on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;



4.       Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all
material respects; and



5.       All
of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports
on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance
with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except
as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
this report on Form 10-K.



In
giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The
Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.



Dated:
March 31, 2017



| |                                                           |                     
| | --------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------
| | By:                                                       | /s/ Barbara Garafalo
| |                                                           | Barbara Garafalo    
| |                                                           | Vice President      
| | (senior officer of depositor in charge of securitization)
#### Chapman, next friend, *vs.*The Atlanta and West Point Railroad.

Where an action was brought against a railroad company, alleging that an infant had been seriously injured through the negligence of the defendant’s servants in not locking or securing a turn-table, a plea which admitted that the child was injured by a turn-table belonging to and used by defendant at the time and place alleged in the declaration, but denied that the defendant was at fault or negligent, was not a plea of justification. To constitute a plea of justification, tho facts alleged must be such as are not admissible-under the plea of the general issue.

*(a.)*The right to open apd conclude to the jury is an important right, and an improper denial of it will work a reversal.

March 10, 1885.

Pleadings. Justification. Practice in Superior Court. Torts. ' Before Judge Harris. Campbell Superior Court. August Term, 1884.

Reported in tbe decision.

Thos. W. Latham, for plaintiff in error.

Bi&by & Dorsey ; P. H. Brewster ; Roan & Rosser Reed & Reed, for defendant.

Blandeord,- Justice.

This was an action by plaintiff in error against defendant in error to recover damages caused by the negligence off defendant’s servants in not locking or securing a turn-table, - whereby the infant son of plaintiff was seriously injured* The defendant filed a plea as follows, viz.

> “ And now comes the defendant and admits that plaintiff was nurtby a turn-table belonging to and used by defendant at the time and place alleged and set forth in plaintiff’s declaration, and that defendant was not at fault or negligent, and therefore, plaintiff is not en-' titled to recover.”

This plea the defendant called a plea of justification. The court held that it was, and. over the plaintiff’s objec- ■ *548tion, allowed the defendant to open and conclude the case to the jury. This is the only error in the record which ■we will notice.

The plea set out is not a plea of justification, if any such plea could be filed in a case like this. To constitute a plea of justification, the facts alleged must be such as are not admissible under a plea of the general issue. See *Barnes vs. Augusta*Factory, 72 Ga., 217. The plea denies any negligence on the part of defendant. The plea does not relieve the plaintiff of any burden whatever, except as to the injury. We have already decided that the right to open and conclude to the jury is an important right, a denial of which unlawfully will work a reversal. *Phelps vs.*Thurman, decided at this term.

Judgment reversed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 24, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00520

- CV

SOUTHLAND LOG HOMES, INC. d/b/a Southland Log Homes and Southland Log Homes, LLC d/b/a Southland Log Homes and a/k/a Texas Favorite Log Home, LLC

, Appellant s

v.

Betty J. PLAN T, Individually and as Trustee of the Betty J. Plant Revocable Tru st, Appellee s

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI05974 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

By order dated September 10, 2019, appellee was ordered to file a response to the appellants ’ request for a stay of the trial court’s order in the underlying cause . On September 20, 2019, the appellee filed a response and a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

In their notice of appeal, the appellants state they seek to appeal the trial court’s order “to the extent the Order denied Southland’s motion/application to compel the mandatory arbit ration of the Plaintiff’s claims against Southland in Richland County, South Carolina.” The appellants further assert they seek to appeal “the Court’s ruling that the arbitration of the Plaintiff’s claims against Southland must be held in Texas, as oppose d to Richland County, South Carolina.”

One of the trial court’s orders in the underlying cause grants in part and denies in part the appellants’ motion to stay the underlying cause, staying the underlying cause pending arbitration

in Texas. T he second o rder entered by the trial court grants plaintiff’s motion to compel

arbitration and orders arbitration to occur in Texas. As noted in appellee’s response, appellate courts do not have jurisdiction to consider an interlocutory appeal of an order granting a motion to compel “albeit not in the ‘first

- choice’ forum .” Al Rushaid v. Nat ’ l Oilwell Varco, Inc. , 814 F.3d 300, 304 (5th Cir. 2016) (citing Bushley v. Credit Suisse First Boston , 360 F.3d 1149, 1153 (9 th Cir. 2004 ), and Augustea Impb Et Salvataggi v. M itsubishi Corp. , 126 F.3d 95, 99 (2d Cir. 1997)). It is therefore ORDERED that appellants respond to the appellee’s motion to dismiss and show cause in writing within fifteen days from the date of this order why this appeal shouldnot be dismissed for lac k of jurisdiction

. All other appellate deadlines are suspend ed pending

this court’s resolution of the jurisdictional issue.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of September, 2019

.

___________________________________ LUZ ESTRADA

, Chief Deputy Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           750
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        79
<OTHER-SE>                      (829)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (2,750)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (2,750)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (2,750)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.00)



</TABLE>
Opinion issued November 7, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00867-CV

———————————

IN RE NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Nissan North America, Inc. has filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

challenging an October 23, 2014 order of the trial court that overruled relator’s 

assertion of trade secret privilege and compelled the production of two documents 
2

submitted for in camera review.* We deny the petition for writ of mandamus and 

lift the stay imposed by our October 27, 2014 order.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

 * The underlying case is BSAG, Inc. and Bob Stallings Nissan of Baytown, Inc. v. 

Baytown Nissan, Inc., Burklein Family Limited Partnership, Nissan North 

America, Inc., and Frederick W. Burklein, cause number 2013-38072, pending in 

the 127th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable R.K. Sandill 

presiding.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT

I, Cameron King, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Quest Oil Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and,

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and,

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|By:   | /S/
Cameron King
Cameron King

President and Chief Executive Officer
|----- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: | August 19, 2005
----

----

**EXHIBIT        32.2**

| (1)    | the                  Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period                  ended                  December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements                  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934                  (15                  U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| (2)    | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company.                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |

| Dated:  June 20,                  2007 | /s/                  Thomas B. Specketer       |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                  | Thomas                  B. Specketer           |   |
|                                                  | Vice                  President and Controller |   |
|                                                  | (chief                  financial officer)     |   |

----

----
**EXHIBIT 31**

 **WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10–K of Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2006-2 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a  materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for theperiod covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  None.

Date:  March 15, 2007

  /s/ Thomas G. LehmannName:  Thomas G. LehmannTitle:    President
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF ROSETTA STONE INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2009
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian D. Helman, Chief Financial Officer of Rosetta Stone Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to
my knowledge, that:



Date: March 9, 2010

/s/ BRIAN D. HELMAN Brian D. Helman


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          70,464                  70,464
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,784                  83,784
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            156,709                 156,709
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            135,665                 135,665
<PP&E>                                           2,779                   2,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 932,213                 932,213
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                       5,838                   5,838
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              49,706                  49,706
<LONG-TERM>                                    355,775                 355,775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           490                     490
<OTHER-SE>                                     345,748                 345,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   932,213                 932,213
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               64,460                 203,174
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             3,901                   8,679
<COMMISSIONS>                                   12,035                  32,367
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,860                  29,910
<COMPENSATION>                                  18,667                  64,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,859                 120,393
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      38,859                 120,393
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,948                  59,629
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .39                    1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38                    1.24


</TABLE>
exv10w1



 





EXHIBIT 10.1




COMPENSATION INFORMATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS




     The table below provides information regarding the 2006 cash bonus, 2007 annual base salary
and 2007 target cash bonus of each named executive officer of
Genitope Corporation (the “Company”).



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Named Executive Officer	 	2006 Cash	 	 	2007 Annual	 	 	2007 Target Cash	 
	 	 	Bonus	 	 	Base
Salary	 	 	Bonus*	 
	Dan W. Denney, Jr.
	 	$	140,400	 	 	$	498,000	 	 	 	55	%
	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	John M. Vuko
	 	$	82,560	 	 	$	312,500	 	 	 	40	%
	Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Mike Buckley
	 	$	49,949	 	 	$	252,000	 	 	 	30	%
	Vice President, Manufacturing
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Bonnie Charpentier
	 	$	—	 	 	$	NA	 	 	 	NA
	Former Vice
President, Regulatory Affairs**
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Claude Miller
	 	$	51,600	 	 	$	260,500	 	 	 	30	%
	Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Tom DeZao***
	 	$	74,672	 	 	$	$271,000	 	 	 	40	%
	Strategic
Marketing and Sales
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 









 




			
	 
	*	 	Percentage of each named executive officer’s 2007 annual base salary
	 
	**	 	Dr. Charpentier resigned from the Company in December 2006.
	 
	***	 	Mr. DeZao was not a named executive officer during fiscal
2006.