alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001088784
<NAME> CANTICLE CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5000000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Gary Schultheis, President and Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Evolve One, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Evolve One, Inc.

September 20, 2004
                                    By:    /s/ Gary Schultheis
                                    Name:  Gary Schultheis
                                    Title: President and Principal Financial
                                           and Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Agile Software Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Carolyn V. Aver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|                       |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: December 8, 2004 |  | /s/ Carolyn V. Aver                    
|                       |  | Carolyn V. Aver Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 99.3

                 [Key Bank USA, National Association Letterhead]







                   MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
                      SERVICING OF SECURITIZED RECEIVABLES


July 30, 1998


Key Bank USA, National Association, successor to AutoFinance Group, Inc.,
maintains a system of internal control over servicing of securitized
receivables, which is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
proper servicing of securitized receivables activity and balances. The system
contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct
deficiencies as they are identified. Even an effective internal control system,
no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations -- including the
possibility of the circumvention of overriding controls -- and therefore can
provide only reasonable assurance with respect to servicing of securitized
receivables. Further, because of changes in conditions, internal control system
effectiveness may vary over time.

Key Bank USA, National Association, successor to AutoFinance Group, Inc.,
management assessed its internal control system over servicing of securitized
receivables, as of June 30, 1998, in relation to criteria for effective internal
control described in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, Key Bank USA, National Association, successor to AutoFinance Group,
Inc., believes that, as of June 30, 1998, its system of internal control over
servicing of securitized receivables met those criteria.


/s/ Thomas R. Blend
-----------------------------------
Thomas R. Blend
Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF, AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED APRIL
1, 2000, INCLUDED IN REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED APRIL 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                          13,781
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (126)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,701
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,144
<PP&E>                                           3,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,203)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,357
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,877
<SALES>                                         31,048
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,048
<CGS>                                           15,162
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,077
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,002
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,002
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,002
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-5502-cr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 9, 2008.

Donna Newman, Law Office of Donna Newman, Esq., New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.

Parvin Daphne Moyne, Assistant United States Attorney (Cathy Seibel, Deputy United States Attorney, on the brief), for Michael J. Garcia, United States Attorney, Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: Hon. RALPH K. WINTER, Hon. PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges, and Hon. MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Mark R. Kravitz, United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

Martinez appeals from the November 13, 2006 order of the district court declining, after this Court’s remand pursuant to *United States v. Crosby,*397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir.2005), to resentence him. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and proceedings in the district court.

We review sentencing decisions for reasonableness, asking “whether the sentencing judge exceeded the bounds of allowable discretion, committed an error of law *99in the course of exercising discretion, or made a clearly erroneous finding of fact.” *United States v. Fernandez,*443 F.3d 19, 27 (2d Cir.2006) (alterations, internal quotation marks, and citation omitted). Martinez argues, *inter alia,*that the district court unreasonably failed or refused to consider Martinez’s 17-day incarceration in a state facility in determining his sentence.

We find no error in Martinez’s sentence. The district court’s order declining to re-sentence Martinez explicitly articulated its reasoning with respect to the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The court specifically noted Martinez’s “violent criminal history,” and the “obvious need to protect the public from [Martinez’s] further violent crimes.” In light of these considerations, and after considering “the sentencing range under the Guidelines and the policy statements,” the district court determined that a 115-month sentence, the longest term suggested by the Guidelines, was appropriate. Although the district court did not explicitly address Martinez’s request that it consider the 17 days he spent in state custody on charges related to his firearms offense, in light of its demonstrated consideration of the relevant factors and policy statements, this omission provides no basis upon which to disturb the district court’s judgment. *See Fernandez,*443 F.3d at 33 (noting that the district court’s failure to address explicitly a defendant’s sentencing argument is not sufficient to overcome this Court’s presumption that the district court “faithfully performed its obligation to consider the § 3553(a) factors”).

We dispose of Martinez’s remaining claims, which challenge the district court’s application of a preponderance of the evidence standard to certain facts relevant to sentencing, in an accompanying opinion.

For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3305 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 

at 224 South Boulder Avenue in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘H. Dale 

Cook Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2009 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. BOREN, Mr. COLE, and Ms. 

FALLIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 224 South Boulder Avenue in Tulsa, 

Oklahoma, as the ‘‘H. Dale Cook Federal Building and 

United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse 

5 located at 224 South Boulder Avenue in Tulsa, Oklahoma, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘H. Dale Cook Fed7 eral Building and United States Courthouse’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3305 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

4 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec5 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘H. Dale 

6 Cook Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6201

DAVID TERRY KIDD, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN DOE; EDWARD W. MURRAY; E. C. MORRIS; BENJAMIN R. HAWKINS; LARRY D. HUFFMAN; MR. LAWSEN; OMBUDSMAN; JOHN B. TAYLOR; LARRY W. JARVIS; STEVE B. HOLLAR; FAYE W. MCCAULEY; W. E. JACK; JAMES R. THOMPSON; SCOTT MILLER; R. HUMPHRIES, Correctional Officer; DIANE CUBBAGE; RUSS FITZGERALD; GARY L. SANDERSON; KATHY FRIES; LYNNE GRAHAM COX; CYNTHIA NUCKOLS; PAT GUERNEY, Defendants - Appellees, and

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; STAUNTON CORRECTIONAL CENTER; CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF WAYNESBORO; 25TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT; MARY SUE TERRY; STEPHEN R. ROSENTHAL; PAMELA ANNE SARGENT; CLARENCE L. JACKSON; LEWIS W. HURST; GAIL Y. BROWNE; JOHN A. BROWN; JACQUELINE F. FRASER; DOCTOR SADDOFF; DOCTOR GARDELLIA; DOCTOR OZINAL; ROD G. GRIFFITH; MARY ANN WHALEY; WENDY G. DODGE; LISA WILHELM; DEE DEE HALL; MICHELLE WOODS; BOB CASH; JUDITH CASH; KAYE MARSHALL; DIANE MOTLEY; THOMAS E. ROBERTS, Clerk of Court, City of Staunton; BRENDA MORRIS; JUDITH OWENS; JOHN ROBERT LEWIS, JR.; MICHAEL M. CLATTERBUCK; PHILLIP COLTRANE; WILLIAM DULL; RAY FITZGERALD; THOMAS E. NORTHROP, Defendants.2Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-93-788-R)
Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 1, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Terry Kidd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Joseph Ross Newell, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, P.C., Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from district court orders: (1) directing the clerk to send a copy of Appellant's discovery request to the Defendants' counsel; and (2) sustaining a Defendant's objection to deposition prior to resolution of a preceding motion for summary judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdictiononly over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders here appealed are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
32





Section
1350 Certification





In
connection with the quarterly report of China Direct, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Yuejian (James) Wang, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Indrajith Andrew Weeraratne, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of our knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











May
      15, 2009
            /s/
      Yuejian (James) WangYuejian
      (James) Wang, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerMay
      15, 2009
            /s/
      Indrajith Andrew WeeraratneIndrajith
      Andrew Weeraratne, Chief Financial
Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15274 and #15275; Texas Disaster Number TX-
00487]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Texas

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 7.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-4332-DR), dated 08/25/2017.
     Incident: Hurricane Harvey.
    Incident Period: 08/23/2017 through 09/15/2017.

DATES: Issued on 10/19/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/24/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/25/2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Texas, dated 08/25/2017, is hereby amended 
to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as 
a result of this disaster to 11/24/2017.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-23183 Filed 10-24-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 332 

To provide that no funds made available to the Department of the Treasury 

may be used to implement, administer, or enforce regulations to require 

specific licenses for travel-related transactions directly related to educational activities in Cuba. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2009 

Ms. LEE of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide that no funds made available to the Department 

of the Treasury may be used to implement, administer, 

or enforce regulations to require specific licenses for travel-related transactions directly related to educational activities in Cuba. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pursuit of Inter5 national Education (PIE) Act of 2009’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 332 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT, AD2 MINISTER, OR ENFORCE REGULATIONS TO 

3 REQUIRE SPECIFIC LICENSES FOR TRAVEL4 RELATED TRANSACTIONS DIRECTLY RE5 LATED TO EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN 

6 CUBA. 

7 (a) LIMITATION.—No funds made available to the 

8 Department of the Treasury may be used to implement, 

9 administer, or enforce the amendments made to para10 graphs (a) and (b) of section 515.565 of title 31, Code 

11 of Federal Regulations (relating to specific licenses for 

12 United States academic institutions and other specific li13 censes), as published in the Federal Register on June 16, 

14 2004 (69 Fed. Reg. 33772). 

15 (b) EXCEPTION.—The limitation in subsection (a) 

16 shall not apply to the implementation, administration, or 

17 enforcement of section 515.560(c)(3) of title 31, Code of 

18 Federal Regulations. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





Certifications





I,
      Daniel
      Slocum, Chief Executive Officer certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dispatch Auto Parts,
      Inc.





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(c) and 15d-(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidates subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal period that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls (all of which do not apply);
      and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls, (all of which
      do
      not apply); and








Date:
      August 23, 2006








/s/
      Daniel Slocum


Daniel
      Slocum