alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > News Articles > Notice to Passengers Regarding American Queen Voyages

Notice to Passengers Regarding American Queen Voyages


Posted on:


February 22, 2024 Posted February 22, 2024 The Federal Maritime Commission has been informed that American Queen Voyages has shut down, cancelled all future voyages, and has filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Consumers who have purchased travel on American Queen Voyages should visit the “Customer Claims Portal” webpage established by the company for information and instructions on how to file a refund claim. Pursuant to FMC regulations, American Queen Voyages was required to maintain a surety bond to refund passengers for nonperformance of transportation. Consumers should also consider: If payment was made by credit card, you may wish to file a claim with the card issuer.



If third-party travel insurance was obtained, a claim should be placed immediately with the insurer. Third party insurers and credit card issuers are often able to provide quicker and fuller reimbursement to passengers. The Commission is not a party to the bankruptcy, nor does it have any role in its proceedings. However individuals with questions may contact the FMC Office of Passenger Vessel Operators (PVO).
 Cruise Notices  News Articles  Public Notices
 Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3547 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3547

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 8, 2009

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 936 South 250 East in Provo, Utah, as the ``Rex E. Lee Post Office 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REX E. LEE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 936 South 250 East in Provo, Utah, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Rex E. Lee Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Rex E. Lee 
Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

MANDATE RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Monday, January 05, 2015

Case Number WR-82,434-01

SEPULVADO, SHAINA

COA No. Tr. Ct. No. F13745-2006-A

Nacogdoches County, 420th District Court

Pursuant to Rule 51.2(a)(1) T.R.A.P, I,

hereby acknowledge receipt of the mandate of the Court of Criminal

Appeals on / 8 I J-c l-$ in the above numbered and styled case.

PLEASE RETURN UPON RECEIPT

ATTN: ABEL ACOSTA
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-11-0000773

11-FEB-2015

11:42 AM
#### James Scarupa et al., Appellants, v Lockport Energy Associates, L.P., et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs. John W. Danforth Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[667 NYS2d 561]

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: James Scarupa (plaintiff), an employee of third-party defendant, John W. Danforth Company (Danforth), was injured when he slipped on muddy ground at a cogeneration plant owned by defendant Lockport Energy Associates, L.P. (Lockport). Plaintiffs commenced this action against Lockport and defendant Chas. T. Main of New York, Inc. (Main), alleging violations of Labor Law §§ 200 and 241 (6). Lockport established that it did not exercise control or supervision over the work leading to the injury or the general condition of the premises, and Supreme Court therefore properly granted summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 200 cause of action against it *{see, Miller v Wilmorite, Inc.,*231 AD2d 843). The court erred, however, in granting that part of defendants’ motion seeking to dismiss the Labor Law § 200 cause of action against Main. Although Main argues that it was not the general contractor, Kelly, an employee of Lockport, testified that it was Main’s responsibility “to get it all done” and that Main hired three subcontractors, including Danforth. Thus, Main failed to establish as a matter of law that it was not a general contractor. With respect to Main’s control of the premises, a Danforth employee testified that the construction manager of Main determined when to place gravel on muddy areas. Thus, there is a question of fact whether Main supervised the general condition of the premises *{see, Miller v Wilmorite, Inc., supra).*

The court properly granted that part of defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action. Although the regulation relied on by plaintiff (12 NYCRR 23-1.7 [d]) meets the specificity requirements of *Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co.*(81 NY2d 494; *see, Durfee v Eastman Kodak Co.,*212 AD2d 971, 972, *lv dismissed*85 NY2d 968), the regulation does not apply to the facts of this case. First, contrary to plaintiffs’ characterization of the area where plaintiff fell as a “passageway”, the area was a common *1039area or open yard in front of or between buildings (see, *McGrath v Lake Tree Vil. Assocs.,*216 AD2d 877, 878). Additionally, plaintiff did not slip on a foreign substance, but slipped on muddy ground that was exposed to the elements *(cf., Cottone v Dormitory Auth.,*225 AD2d 1032).

We modify the order, therefore, by denying that part of defendants’ motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the Labor Law § 200 cause of action against Main. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Joslin, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XF788

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) Groundfish Plan Team will meet November 13 through November 17, 2017.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Monday, November 13, 2017 to Friday, November 17, 2017, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pacific Time.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Alaska Fishery Science Center, Traynor Room 2076, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Building 4, Seattle, WA 98115.

*Council address:*                         North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252; telephone: (907) 271-2809.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Diana Stram or Jim Armstrong, Council staff; telephone: (907) 271-2809.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Agenda

### Monday, November 13 to Friday, November 17, 2017

The Plan Teams will compile and review the annual Groundfish Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) reports, (including the Economic Report, the Ecosystems/assessment and status report, and the stock assessments for BSAI and GOA groundfishes), and recommend final groundfish harvest specifications for 2017/2018.

                    The Agenda is subject to change, and the latest version will be posted at                     *http://www.npfmc.org/​fishery-management-plan-team/​goa-bsai-groundfish-plan-team/​.*

## Special Accommodations

These meetings are physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Shannon Gleason at (907) 271-2809 at least 7 working days prior to the meeting date.

Dated: October 20, 2017.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2017-23190 Filed 10-24-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### In the Matter of Robert Dezendorf, Appellant, v William Bratton, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

[666 NYS2d 140]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered November 12, 1996, which denied petitioner’s application, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, challenging respondents’ determination denying him line-of-duty accident disability retirement benefits, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports respondents’ determination to deny petitioner’s retirement application. While a magnetic resonance imaging test conducted on petitioner’s spine revealed the existence of “a small mid line disc herniation” at L4-5, there was *114also found to be no "involvement of the dural tube or * * * encroachment at the foramina”. The Medical Board examined petitioner, at his request, on five occasions and found no tenderness to palpitation over the lumbosacral paraspinal area, active and symmetrical deep tendon reflexes, no evidence of thigh or calf muscle atrophy, and no complaints of pain with knee flexion in the supine position. In addition, petitioner complained of pain when certain motion tests were performed, but not when others were performed that should have elicited the same complaints.

We have considered petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **UNDER**
 **SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**
 
 I, Michael R. Haynes, Chief Executive Officer of Collectors Universe, Inc. certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Collectors Universe, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004;  2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) for the registrant and we have:  (a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  
  
 Date:November 12, 2004

/s/ MICHAEL R. HAYNESMichael R. HaynesChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32








WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH RULE 13a-14(b)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.





In connection with the Annual Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VI (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge, that: (a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/Kimberly A. Springsteen-AbbottKimberly A. Springsteen-AbbottChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerApril 15, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Lasker Clinical Research Scholars Program Si2/R00.                    

*Date:*                         November 13, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         12:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Zhuqing (Charlie) Li, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, Room #3G41B, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC9823 Bethesda, MD 20892-9823, (240) 669-5068,                         *zhuqing.li@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 12, 2017.

Natasha M. Copeland, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-22571 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### YUPING SUN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71391.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 14, 2011.

Yuping Sun, San Fernando, CA, pro se.

Eric Warren Marsteller, Esquire, Trial, Oil, Carol Federighi, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Yuping Sun, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the new standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the Real ID Act. *Shrestha v. Holder,*590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.

The agency found Sun not credible because, during her hearing, she held and referred to a typewritten copy of her declaration in support of her asylum application, and provided inconsistent explanations for her possession of it. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination. *See id.*at 1040-44 (adverse credibility determination was *704reasonable under the Real ID Act’s “totality of the circumstances”); *Malkandi v. Holder,*576 F.3d 906, 917-19 (9th Cir.2009). In the absence of credible testimony, Sun’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir.2003).

Sun has not raised any direct challenge to the agency’s denial of CAT relief. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not supported by argument are deemed abandoned).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.