alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

                                  Exhibit 27.01

                             Financial Data Schedule


                       PLAY CO. TOYS & ENTERTAINMENT CORP.

                                  EXHIBIT 27.01

                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

         This schedule contains summary  information  extracted from the Balance
Sheet,  Statement  of  Operations,  Statement  of Cash  Flows and Notes  thereto
incorporated  in Part I,  Item 7, of this Form 10 -KSB and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<CAPTION>

<S>                                                    <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 177,722
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          60,206
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            6,092,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       6,578,171
<PP&E>                                                 5,304,563
<DEPRECIATION>                                         (2,828,913)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         9,378,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  8,148,657
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            2,500,570
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                             (1,497,534)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           9,378,618
<SALES>                                                19,624,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       19,624,276
<CGS>                                                  13,669,104
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       8,881,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     658,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (3,584,881)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (3,584,881)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (1.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (1.29)
        


 

<PAGE>

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10074

Summary Calendar

GERALD R. BROOKMAN and DARLENE L. BROOKMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JESSE BROWN, Secretary, an Officer of the United States of

America,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the

Northern District of Texas

(4;95-CV-428-A)

June 9, 1997

Before JOHNSON, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The defendant’s, the Secretary of Veteran’s Affairs (the

Secretary), petition for rehearing is granted and this court’s

prior opinion is withdrawn. The following opinion is substituted

in its place.

On appeal, Gerald and Darlene Brookman complain that the

district court erroneously granted summary judgment in favor of the

Secretary. The Brookmans contend that a material fact issue exists
2

about the Secretary’s status as a bona fide purchaser.

We review the district court’s order granting summary judgment

in favor of the Secretary de novo. See, e.g., Degan v. Ford Motor

Co., 869 F.2d 889, 892 (5th Cir. 1989). In determining whether the

district court properly granted summary judgment, this court

applies the same standards used by the district court. Thus, we

review the evidence a light most favorable to the non-movant and

then determine whether the movant is entitled to judgment as a

matter of law. See id.

After carefully reviewing the record in the present case, we

hold that no genuine issue of material fact exists as to the

Secretary’s status as a bona fide purchaser. Therefore, the

Secretary is entitled to judgment as a matter of law and the

district court’s order is

AFFIRMED.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3547 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 8, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 936 South 250 East in Provo, Utah, as the 

‘‘Rex E. Lee Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3547 RFS

1 SECTION 1. REX E. LEE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 936 South 250 East in Provo, 

4 Utah, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Rex E. Lee 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Rex E. Lee Post Of10 fice Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
TAM AR A ALYN LANHAM , Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt,
v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Ac ting C om m issione r of Soc i a l Se c urity , De fe nda n t-Appe l le e . No. 22-35399 D.C . No. 6:20-c v-01601-M C
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Sta t e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ore gon M ic ha e l J. M c Shane , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Argue d a nd Subm itte d April 20, 2023 Portla nd, Ore gon B e fore : R

AW LINSON, B EA, a

nd SUNG, C irc uit Judge s . Tam ara Lanha

m a ppe a ls the de n ia l of he r a

pplic a t ion for Soc i a l Se c urity be ne fits. W e re v i e w the distric t c ourt’ s de c ision “ de novo, a nd will disturb the de nia l of be ne fits only

if the de c ision c onta ins le ga l e rror or is not supporte d by 

# FIL ED
MAY4 2023 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.substa

ntia l e vide nc e .” Te rry

v . Saul , 998 F.3d 1010, 1012 (9th C i r. 2021) (c ita tion
om i tte d). 1. Any

e rror in inc orporating the re sidua l func tiona l c a pa c i ty (RFC ) lim ita tion of “ m inim a l re a ding a nd writing skills”

into thehy

pothe t ic a l pose d to the V oc a t iona l Expe rt (VE) wa s ha rm le ss. Se e C

armic k le v . C omm’r Soc . Se c . Admin. , 533 F.3d 1155, 1162 (9th C ir. 2008) (e xpla ining tha t a n e rror is ha

rm le ss whe n it is “ inc onse q

u e ntia l to the ultim a te nondisa bility de te rm i na tion” ) (c ita

tions
om i tte d)). The VE ide n t ifie d two jobs in the nat iona l e c onom

y , sm a ll pa

rts
a sse m ble r and e le c tronic s worke r, whic h do not re quire re a ding or writing. And Lanha m c onc e d e d be fore the distric t c o urt a nd at ora l a

rgum e nt on a

ppe a l tha t she
c ould pe rform the se jobs. 2. The ALJ did not err by de c lining to a ddre ss the re butta l job-num be rs
e vide nc e . Se e W

hite v . K ijak azi , 44 F.4th 828, 836 (9th C ir. 2022) (“ [A] n ALJ
ne e d only re s olve job-num

be r inc onsiste nc ie s if the c om pe ting job num

be rs
c onstitute signific ant proba

t ive e vide nc e . . . .” ) (c ita tion, a l te ra tion, a

nd inte rna l quota t ion m arks om itte d)). The ge ne ric job num be rs c onta ine d in La

nha m ’ s posthe aring filing did not signific antly unde rm ine the VE’ s e xpe rt opinion re g arding the n um be r of a va ila ble jobs. Se e K

ilpatrick v . K ijak azi , 35 F.4th 1187, 1192–93 (9th C ir. 2022) (re c ogniz ing VEs a s e xpe rts). In a d dition, La nha m did not c ross2e xam ine the VE re ga rding the job-num

be rs e stim at e s. Se e Shaibi v . Be rry hill , 883 F.3d 1102, 1110 (9th C ir. 2017), as ame nde d. “ W e re c ogniz e that a c la im ant will
ra re ly , if e ve r, be in a

position to a

ntic ipate the pa

rtic ula r oc c upat ions a

VE m ight list[,] ” but a

c la im ant m ay

“ inquir[e ] a s to the e vide ntia ry ba sis for a

VE’ s
e stim a te d job num

be rs, or inquir[e ] a s to” the c onsiste nc y of the num

be rs. Id. AFFIRM E D.

3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20424-0001

TO: All FLRA Employees, Former Employees, & Applicants for 

Employment

FROM: Erica Balkum

Equal Employment Opportunity Director

DATE: July 20, 2023

SUBJECT: Listing of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Counselors

In the federal sector, employment discrimination based on race, color, 

religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), 

national origin, age (40 or older), disability, genetic information, or retaliation 

for EEO activity is prohibited. Employees, former employees, and applicants 

who believe that they have suffered this form of discrimination may file a 

complaint of discrimination. 

To initiate a complaint of discrimination, you must consult with an EEO 

counselor within 45 calendar days of the alleged discriminatory event.

A list of EEO Counselors and their contact information follows. Contact either 

of these EEO Counselors if you have any questions or concerns regarding 

employment discrimination or if you wish to file an EEO complaint.

Veneka Henderson 

• (470) 681-7634; vhenderson@flra.gov

Merritt Weinstein 

• (771) 444-5803; mweinstein@flra.gov

You may also contact me at (771) 444-5809 if you have any questions or concerns 

about the EEO program at the FLRA. 

Additional information regarding the agency’s EEO program is available online at: 

• The No FEAR Act & EEO page on the FLRA Internet site 

(https://www.flra.gov/no-fear-act-eeo); and

• The EEO Matters page on the FLRA intranet.

(https://intranet.flra.gov/?q=EEOMatters)
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3204 

To authorize States and localities receiving assistance under the Neighborhood 

Stabilization Program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development to use such amounts for renovating owner-occupied housing of 

low-income families. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2009 

Mr. TURNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To authorize States and localities receiving assistance under 

the Neighborhood Stabilization Program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development to use such 

amounts for renovating owner-occupied housing of lowincome families. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBLE USES. 

4 Paragraph (3) of section 2301(c) of the Housing and 

5 Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (42 U.S.C. 5301 note) 

6 is amended— 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 3204 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period 

4 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the fol6 lowing new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(F) renovate single-family housing that is 

8 owned and occupied as a principal residence by 

9 a family whose income does not exceed 80 per10 cent of the median income of the area in which 

11 the housing is located, as determined by the 

12 Secretary with adjustments for smaller and 

13 larger families.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM DOBBS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 52 EM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5 th day of December , 2022, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc , in which Attorney Matthew Francis Sullivan

admits that he negligently failed to file a timely Petition for Allowance of Appeal, is

GRANTED.

Attorney Sullivan is DIRECTED to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15

days.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-2649

___________________________ Johnathon Watkins lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp.; Beekam; Dusan lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Southern

____________ Submitted: August 10, 2023 Filed: August 24, 2023 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Johnathon Watkins appeals the preservice dismissal of his employment-related action against his former employer, Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp. (Smithfield),and two co-workers. The district court 1 construed Watkins’s complaint as raising

claims under Title VII. The court dismissed without prejudice the complaint as to Smithfield for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and dismissed with prejudice the complaint as to the co-workers, reasoning that Title VII does not impose liability on individuals. We conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing the complaint as to Smithfield, as the complaint made no allegations concerning exhaustion of administrative remedies. See Miles v. Bellfontaine Habilitation Ctr. , 481 F.3d 1106, 1107 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (noting that a Title VII plaintiff must exhaust administrative remedies before bringing suit and that Miles had adequately alleged exhaustion by stating she had filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and by attaching her right-to-sue letter to her complaint); Brooks v. Midwest Heart Grp. , 655 F.3d 796, 801 (8th Cir. 2011) (“[T]he statement in Brooks’s complaint that she ‘timely filed charges of Employment Discrimination before the US EEOC’ was sufficient to meet the liberal pleading standard of Rule 8(a).”). We likewise agree with the district court that dismissal of the individual defendants was warranted. See Powell v. Yellow Book USA, Inc. , 445 F.3d 1074, 1079 (8th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. -2-
NO

. AP -77,045

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

* * *

HARLEM HAROLD LEWIS III ,
Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

* * *

MOTION FOR WITHDRAW AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

*Death Penalty Case*

__________________________________________________________

On Appeal in Cause No. 1428102 from the 351 ST District Court of

Harris County, Texas

___________________________________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

NOW COMES, ROBERT MORROW, requesting to withdraw as

counsel for Appellant HARLEM HAROLD LEWIS III and GERALD E.

BOURQUE, requesting to substitute as counsel for Appellant, HARLEM AP-77,045 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 4/22/2015 3:37:41 PM Accepted 4/22/2015 4:15:36 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK2

HAROLD LEWIS III, and files this Motion for Withdraw and Substitution

of Counsel. In support of this motion, Counsel respectfully shows the Court

the following:

I.

After a hearing, the trial court determined that a conflict had arisen

between appointed counsel and Appellant

. Attorney Gerald E. Bourque,

State Bar No. 02716500, requests to substitute in as new appellate counsel.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Counsel respectfully

prays that the Court grant his motion as set out above.

Respectfully submitted:

/s/ Robert A. Morrow

______ ROBERT A. MORROW State Bar No. 14542600 24 Waterway Ave., Suite 660 The Woodlands, Texas 77380 Telephone: 281-379-6901 F ax : 832- 813 -0321

________________________ GERALD E. BOURQUE State Bar No. 02716500 24 Waterway Ave., Suite 660 The Woodlands, TX 77380 Telephone: 281-379-6901 Fax: 832- 813 -0321 /s/ G erald E. Bourqu eCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

As required

, and in a ccordance with

, the Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure, I certify that I have served this document on the following parties

on April 2 2 , 2015 :

Harris County District Attorney's Office Appellate Division 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002 P h. 713

- 755

- 5826 Fax: 713

- 755

- 5809

Harlem Lewis Harold Lewis III TDCJ# 0099959 5 3872 FM 350 South Livingston, Texas 7735 1

/s/ R obert A. Morrow

__ ____ R OBERT A. MORROW
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49072-49073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22924]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15366 and #15367; SOUTH CAROLINA Disaster Number 
SC-00052]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of South Carolina

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of South Carolina 
(FEMA-4346-DR), dated 10/16/2017.
    Incident: Hurricane Irma.
    Incident Period: 09/06/2017 through 09/13/2017.

DATES: Issued on 10/16/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/15/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/16/2018.

[[Page 49073]]


ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 10/16/2017, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Allendale, Anderson, Bamberg, Barnwell, Beaufort, 
Berkeley, Charleston, Colleton, Dorchester, Edgefield, Georgetown, 
Hampton, Jasper, McCormick, Oconee, Pickens.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 153668 
and for economic injury is 153670.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-22924 Filed 10-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Trust.

Date: January 14, 2011



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ NICK BONOS                                       
|Nick Bonos*                                          
|Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal executive officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Hacker, Johnson & Smith PA

Alarion Financial Services, Inc.

Ocala, Florida

We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated March 1, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Alarion Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005, and for the period from February 19, 2004 (date of organization) to December 31, 2004, in the Companys 2005 annual report on Form 10-KSB/A.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Hacker, Johnson & Smith PA
|Hacker, Johnson & Smith PA    
|Orlando, Florida              
|May 4, 2006