alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w17



 





Exhibit 10.17




SUMMARY OF

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION




	 	 	 
	Board Fees

	 	Each non-employee director shall receive annualized
compensation of $25,000.00 for service as a director
of the Board of GTT. Specifically, at the end of each
calendar quarter during which a non-employee director
serves as a member of the Board, such director shall
receive $6,250.00 for such service (or a pro-rated
amount in the event that the director served as such
for less than the full calendar quarter).
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Each chairperson of a Board committee shall receive
additional annualized compensation in the amount of
$5,000.00 for service in such capacity. Specifically,
at the end of each calendar quarter during which the
director serves as a committee chair, such director
shall receive $1,250.00 for such service (or a
pro-rated amount in the event that the director served
in that capacity for less than the full calendar
quarter).
	 
	 	 
	Initial Stock Award

	 	At such time as the Registration Statement on Form S-8
registering the equity securities authorized for
issuance under GTT’s 2006 Employee, Director, and
Consultant Stock Plan (the “Plan”) is filed and
becomes effective (the “Registration Date”), each
non-employee director serving as of the date of the
initial GTT Board meeting shall receive an equity
award equal to $50,000.00 of GTT common stock valued
as of the Registration Date (the “Award”). The Award
shall vest in four equal annual installments, starting
upon the Registration Date. The Award shall in all
respects be subject to the terms and conditions set
 forth in the Plan.
	 
	 	 
	Expenses

	 	Reasonable expenses incurred by each director in
connection with service to the Board shall be
reimbursed in accordance with the By-laws of GTT.
# Presidential Determination With Respect to the Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to section 404 of the Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008 (22 U.S.C. 2370c-1) (CSPA), I hereby determine as follows:

It is in the national interest of the United States to waive the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to Mali and Nigeria; to waive the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to the Democratic Republic of the Congo to allow for provision of Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) assistance, to the extent the CSPA would restrict such assistance or support; to waive the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to Somalia to allow for the provision of International Military Education and Training assistance, PKO assistance, and support provided pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 333, to the extent the CSPA would restrict such assistance or support; and to waive the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to South Sudan to allow for PKO assistance, to the extent the CSPA would restrict such assistance or support. Accordingly, I hereby waive such applications of section 404(a) of the CSPA.

                    You are authorized and directed to submit this determination to the Congress, along with the Memorandum of Justification, and to publish the determination in the                     *Federal Register.*

[FR Doc. 2017-23145

Billing code 4710-10-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Pete R. Pizarro, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of eLandia International Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended
December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of eLandia International, Inc.



|                    |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 2, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Pete R. Pizarro    
|                    |  |     |  | Pete R. Pizarro        
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
DIS AG Share Purchase Agreement (English summary)



 DIS AG SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT 
 (English Language Summary) 
 On January 9, 2006, Adecco Germany Holding GmbH (“Adecco
Germany”) and members of the Paulmann family entered into a purchase agreement for the acquisition by Adecco Germany of shares of the company DIS Deutscher Industrie Service Aktiengesellschaft (“DIS AG”) held by the Paulmann Family.

 The agreement provides for the acquisition of 3,568,820 shares of DIS AG, representing approximately 29% of DIS AG’s voting rights. 
 The parties agreed on a final purchase price of EUR 54.50 per DIS AG share, representing an aggregate purchase price of approximately EUR 195 million. 
 The consummation of the purchase was subject to the condition precedent of merger control clearance by the competent competition authorities. These approvals were
obtained on March 3, 2006 and the transaction closed on March 13, 2006.
<Page>

                                                            Exhibit 99.1


           LABRANCHE & CO. COMPLETES ACQUISITION OF CRANMER & CRANMER
       - TRANSACTION SOLIDIFIES PRESENCE ON THE AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE -
                   - ESTABLISHES EQUITY PRESENCE ON THE AMEX -
                       - STRENGTHENS PRESENCE IN OPTIONS -


         NEW YORK, NEW YORK, August 14, 2001 - LaBranche & Co Inc. (NYSE: LAB),
parent of a leading Specialist firm, announced today that it has completed its
acquisition of AMEX Specialist Cranmer & Cranmer. Cranmer acts as the Specialist
for approximately fifty common stocks, including Nabors Industries, Inc., a
component of the S&P 500 and one of the most actively traded stocks on the AMEX.
Cranmer also acts as the Specialist for 85 options, including Procter & Gamble
Company, Pepsi-Cola Company, Merrill Lynch & Co. and Abbott Laboratories.

         Michael LaBranche, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of LaBranche,
commented, "The AMEX is a dynamic marketplace in the process of consolidation.
This transaction strengthens our position on the AMEX and underscores our
commitment to the listed auction market. With the addition of Cranmer's
portfolio, LaBranche establishes a solid presence in AMEX equities and increases
its share of the equity option business."

         Mr. LaBranche added, "We are confident that this combination will
enable us to deliver increased value to the listed companies, their
shareholders, and the AMEX's expanding customer base."

         Terms of the transaction were not disclosed.

         Founded in 1924, LaBranche is a leading Specialist firm. The Company is
the Specialist for over 550 companies, nine of which are in the Dow Jones
Industrial Average and 98 of which are in the S&P 500 Index. In addition,
LaBranche acts as the Specialist in over 100 options.

         CERTAIN STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS RELEASE, INCLUDING WITHOUT
LIMITATION, STATEMENTS CONTAINING THE WORDS "BELIEVES", "INTENDS", "EXPECTS",
"ANTICIPATES", AND WORDS OF SIMILAR IMPORT, CONSTITUTE "FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS" WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT
OF 1995. READERS ARE CAUTIONED THAT ANY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE NOT
GUARANTEES OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE, AND SINCE SUCH STATEMENTS INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES, THE ACTUAL RESULTS AND PERFORMANCE OF LABRANCHE AND THE INDUSTRY
MAY TURN OUT TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE RESULTS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY
SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. GIVEN THESE UNCERTAINTIES, READERS ARE
CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.
LABRANCHE ALSO DISCLAIMS ANY OBLIGATION TO UPDATE ITS VIEW OF ANY SUCH RISKS OR
UNCERTAINTIES OR TO PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE THE RESULT OF ANY REVISIONS TO THE
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS RELEASE.
Exhibit 32









CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Luna Medical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Cameron King, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Cameron King



Cameron King

Chief Executive Officer

September 29, 2003



























In connection with the Quarterly Report of Luna Medical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Grod McDougall, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Gord McDougall



Gord McDougall

Acting Chief Financial Officer

September 29, 2003
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF** **CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **UNDER**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**
 
 
 COLLECTORS
UNIVERSE, INC.
 
 Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
 for the
Quarter ended December 31, 2004
 
 
 The
undersigned, Michael J. Lewis, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Collectors
Universe, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed by the Company
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Quarterly Report”), to which
this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable
requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Date:February
      14, 2005
    
    /s/
      MICHAELJ.
      LEWISMichaelJ.
      LewisChiefFinancial
      OfficerA
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Collectors Universe, Inc. and will be retained by Collectors
      Universe, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Gerald Clark ROY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20267

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gerald Clark Roy has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders *v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Roy has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Renee Giovati et al., Respondents, v Yuon Kavanagh et al., Defendants, and Halmar Corporation et al., Appellants.

[666 NYS2d 30]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Halmar Corporation and Defoe Corp. a/k/a Halmar-Defoe Corporation appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated July 30, 1996, as dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against them without prejudice.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, with costs, and the complaint insofar as asserted against the appellants is dismissed with prejudice.

Under the circumstances presented, the Supreme Court’s dismissal of the complaint insofar as asserted against the appellants without prejudice was an improvident exercise of discretion. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Joy and Lerner, JJ., concur.
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 4, 2008

Augusta Resource Corporation

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: Augusta Resource
Corporation

I, Jerry T. Hanks, do hereby
consent to the filing of the written disclosure of the technical report entitled
2007 Mineral Resource Update for the Rosemont Project, Pima County, Arizona,
USA dated April 26, 2007, in the Form 40-F Annual Report and the Annual
Information Form of Augusta Resource Corporation (the Company) dated March 4,
2008

I also consent to the use of my
name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report and Annual Information Form dated
March 4, 2008 in my capacity as a consulting engineer.

| | By: | */s/
      Jerry T. Hanks*
| | --- | --------------------------
| |     | Jerry T. Hanks, P.E.      
| |     | Consulting Engineer       
| |     | Tucson, Arizona           

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Donato SANTAMARIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10225

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

Suzanna Odette Etessam, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William Reynolds Biggs, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Laura S. Harper, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*369Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Donato Santamaría presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by *United States v. London,*568 F.3d 553, 564 (5th Cir.2009), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 631, 178 L.Ed.2d 507 (2010). The Supreme Court adopted the position advanced in *London. See Abbott v. United States,*— U.S.-,-, 131 S.Ct. 18, 23, 178 L.Ed.2d 348 (2010) (holding that a defendant is subject to a mandatory, consecutive sentence for a conviction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) even if the defendant received a higher mandatory minimum on a different count of conviction). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         230,596
<SECURITIES>                                    79,873
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                       603
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               317,692
<PP&E>                                           8,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 439,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                     422,834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   439,884
<SALES>                                          5,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,563
<CGS>                                              448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,746)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,932)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,932)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,932)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 202 (Friday, October 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48841-48842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3389-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Alabama; Emergency and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice corrects the previous Federal Register notice of 
an emergency declaration for the State of Alabama (FEMA-3389-EM), dated 
September 11, 2017, and related determinations.

DATES: This correction was issued on October 11, 2017.

[[Page 48842]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA previously published a Federal Register 
notice on October 2, 2017 at 82 FR 45875 providing notice of a 
Presidential declaration of an emergency for the State of Alabama. That 
notice incorrectly stated that all 67 counties in the State of Alabama 
and the Poarch Band of Creek Indians had been designated as eligible 
for debris removal and emergency protective measures (Categories A and 
B), including direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance 
program. The 67 counties in the State of Alabama and the Poarch Band of 
Creek Indians are only designated as eligible for emergency protective 
measures (Category B), including direct federal assistance, under the 
Public Assistance program.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-22747 Filed 10-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          6,545
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                            858
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (262)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  7,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             646
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        1,161
<OTHER-SE>                                      5,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    7,141
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               25,774
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,774)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,774)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,774)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)



</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133366 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133366 

 COA: 271382 
 Wayne CC: 96-001138-01

LAMARR MONSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 31, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk