alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 344 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 344

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a full deduction 
         for meals and lodging in connection with medical care.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2009

  Mr. Platts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a full deduction 
         for meals and lodging in connection with medical care.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FULL DEDUCTION FOR MEALS AND LODGING IN CONNECTION WITH 
              MEDICAL CARE.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 213(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to amounts paid for certain lodging away 
from home treated as paid for medical care) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``meals and'' before ``lodging'' in the 
        heading,
            (2) by inserting ``meals and'' before ``lodging'' in the 
        text, and
            (3) by striking the last sentence.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Meade, Appellant.

[665 NYS2d 877]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Price, J.), rendered March 11, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 Vs to 62/s years, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remanded to Supreme Court, Bronx County for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Defendant’s speedy trial motion was properly denied. The record supports all determinations of the trial court with respect to the adjournments contested by defendant on appeal, with the exception of the court’s exclusion of the five-day adjournment from February 22, 1995 to February 27, 1995. As this five-day adjournment was granted at the request of the People, they should have been charged with an additional five days. However, adding the five additional days to the trial court’s determination that 170 days are chargeable to the People, the total chargeable to the People is 175 days, below the statutory limit under CPL 30.30.

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling was an appropriate exercise of discretion.

The court’s questioning of the jurors, as a group, regarding an incident involving a discharged alternate juror was suitable under the circumstances, and the court was justified in accepting the jurors’ oral responses indicating that their knowledge of the incident would have no effect on their ability to determine this case in a fair and impartial manner *(see, People*
      *105
      *v Silvestre,*192 AD2d 563, *lv denied*82 NY2d 726). The court’s denial of defendant’s mistrial motion was a proper exercise of discretion.

We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. The record does not support defendant’s claim that the court considered improper criteria. We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Tom, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In connection with this Yearly Report of Magnegas Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Luisa Ingargiola, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
   1. Such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Magnegas Corporation.
   Date: March 30, 2011
   /s/ Luisa Ingargiola
 Luisa Ingargiola
 Chief Financial Officer
#### Robert D. Bowman, Jr., Respondent, v Osborne Agency, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Utica National Insurance Company, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 23]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Utica National Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), entered August 22, 1996, which denied its motion to vacate a prior order of the same court dated November 9, 1995, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

After the court granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, the parties agreed that, upon further discovery and *329the submission of additional papers, the court “may reconsider the motion”. In the absence of material issues of fact, the court properly denied the appellant’s motion to vacate the earlier order *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557).

The appellant’s remaining contentions lack merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 27 33

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Je rrel l Hen de rs on
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta - St. Pa ul

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Octo be r 15 , 20 18 Fi le d: Decem

be r 3, 2 01 8 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SM ITH, Chi ef J ud ge , LOKE N and GRUENDER, Circu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Je rrel l Hen de rs on pl ead ed gu il ty to be in g a fel on in po ss es si on of a fir earm an d

was se nt en ced to 72 m on th s’ im pr is o n ment

. On ap pe al , Hen de rs on arg ue s th at th edi st ric t co ur t pr oc ed ur al ly erre d in cl as si fy in g hi s Mi nn es ot a co nv ic ti on fo r fir st

1 de gr ee ag gr av at edrob be ry as a “ cri m e o f vi ol en ce.” Se e U.S.S.G. § 4 B1 .2(a )(1 ). 2

“ The te rm ‘crim e of vi o l e nc e’ m ean s an y of fen se un de r fed eral or st at e la w, pu ni sh ab le by im

pr is on m en t fo r a te rm ex ceed in g on e y ear, th at

. . . ha s as an el em en t th e us e, at te m

pt ed us e, or th reat en ed us e of ph y si cal fo rce a g a i n s t t he pe rs on of

an ot he r
. . . .” Id

. Thi s s ub pa rag rap h i s k no wn “ as th e ‘force cl au se .’ ” Uni te d St at es
v. Sc hn ei de r , 9 05 F.3 d 10 88 , 1 09 0 (8 th Ci r. 20 18 ). “ Bas edon th ei r ne arl y id en ti cal de fin i ti on s, we co ns tru e ‘vio le nt fel on y ’ un de r 18 U.S.C. § 92 4( e)(2 )(B) (ii ) (th e Arm ed Care er Cri m in al Act) an d ‘crim e o f v i o le nc e’ un de r th e Gui de li ne s as in te rch an ge ab le , in cl ud i n g th e co rres po nd in g fo rce cl au se s an d res id ua l cl au se s.” Uni te d S ta te s v. Bo os e , 73 9 F .3d 11 85 , 11 87 n.1 (8t h C ir. 2 01 4)

.
W e ha ve he ld th at “ si m

pl e ro bb ery in Mi nn es ot a—a nd as a res ul t, fir st de gr ee ag gr av at ed ro bbe ry

—qu al if ie s as a pred ic at e of

fen se un de r th e ACCA.” Uni te d St at es
v. Li bb y , 88 0 F.3 d 10 11 , 10 15 –1 6 (8 th Ci r. 20 18 ). The refo r e , i t f o l lo ws th at fir st

de gr ee ag gr av at ed ro bb ery in Mi nn es ot a co ns ti t u te s a cri m e of vi ol en ce un de r th e Gui de li ne s. Se e Boo se , 73 9 F .3d at 1 18 7 n .1.

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm

th e jud gm en t o f th e d is tri ctco ur t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Jo hn R. Tun he im , Ch ie f Ju dg e of th e Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct 1 Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta

. Mi nn . Sta t. § 60 9.2 45 , su bd . 1. 2

-2

-
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencyShares® Swedish Krona Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Trust.

Date: January 14, 2011



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ NICK BONOS               
|Nick Bonos*                  
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal executive officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CURTIS W. MEWBOURNE / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MEWBOURNE
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners
07-A, L.P. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K, for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneName:

Curtis W. MewbourneDate:

March 31, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         October 31, 2017.                    

      ( print page 50460)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 25, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express Contract 52 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-16, CP2018-32.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-23596 Filed 10-30-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
January 31, 2017

Federal Maritime Commission 

Conference-Related Spending, FY 2012 through FY 2016 

Pursuant to OMB Memorandum M-12-12, Promoting Efficient Spending to Support Agency 

Operations, and OMB Memorandum M-17-08, Amending OMB Memorandum M-12-12, 

Promoting Efficient Spending to Support Agency Operations, agencies must publicly report any 

agency-hosted or -sponsored conference where net expenses for the conference exceed 

$100,000. OMB memorandum M-12-12 defines a “conference” as “[a] meeting, retreat, seminar, 

symposium or event that involves attendee travel. The term ‘conference’ also applies to training 

activities that are considered to be conferences under 5 C.F.R. § 410.404.” See 41 C.F.R. § 300-

3.1.

Consistent with that guidance, the Federal Maritime Commission strives to ensure that 

conference expenses are appropriate, necessary, and managed in a manner that minimizes 

expense to taxpayers. The FMC has not hosted or sponsored any conference that met or 

exceeded the OMB-defined $100,000 spending level during fiscal years 2012 through 2016.
Exhibit 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Lynch  Interactive
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2003, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  Robert E. Dolan, as Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                            /s/ Robert E. Dolan
                                            -------------------
                                            Name: Robert E. Dolan
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 13, 2003



     This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to ss.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NO. 07-03-0031 6-CV IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L A OCTOBER 10, 2003

______________________________ ESTELLA RODRIGUEZ, APPE LLANT

V. DONALD C. FR IETAG, M.D., APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 10 6TH DIST RICT COURT OF LYNN COUNT Y; NO. 02-0806016; HON ORABLECARTER TINSLEY

SCHILDK NECHT, JU DGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPB ELL, JJ. MEM ORAN DUM OP INI ON AppellantEstella Rodr iguez fi led a noti ce of appeal challe nging the tr ial cou rt’s order signed April 22, 2003. On Septem ber 4, 2003, the trial court clerk filed a motion for extension of time in which to fil e the clerk’s record citi ng, among other reasons, appe llan t’s failure to payor m ake arrangem ents to pay for the record. By letter dated Se ptem ber 5,2

2003, the m otion was granted extending the deadline to Septem ber 26, 2003. By that same letter, appel lant’s counsel , Mr. David Martinez, was directed to cert ify to th is Court on orbefore S eptem ber 25, 2 003, w hether h e had co m plied with Rules 34 .5(1 0) an d 35.3(a)( 2) of th e Texas R ules of Appellate Procedure, noting that failure to do so m ight res ult in dismissal of the appeal. SeeTex. R. App. P. 37. 3(b). Mr. Mart inez di d not respond and the clerk’s record has not been filed. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dism issed for want of prosecution. Don H. Reavis Justice
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-163068) ofCurrencyShares® Australian Dollar Trust of our reports dated December 29, 2010, with respect to thefinancial statements of CurrencyShares® Australian Dollar Trust, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of CurrencyShares® Australian Dollar Trust, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended October 31, 2010. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

McLean, VA 

December 29, 2010
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar MONDRAGON-MARTELL, aka Fernando Vasquez-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-10224.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 18, 2008.

Decided May 1, 2008.

Tracey A. Bardorf, Esq., USPX-Offiee of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Cesar Mondragon-Martell, Florence, AZ, pro se.

Philip E. Hantel, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: HUG, SCHROEDER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Cesar Mondragon-Martell (“Mondragon-Martell”) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation. He argues his counsel was so ineffective at trial that it deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, and that the district court improperly admitted evidence of his past conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation. He also claims the Government did not present sufficient evidence to prove he was deported. Finally, he argues that, given his health issues, his prison sentence is excessive.

We only review challenges to the effectiveness of defense counsel on direct appeal where the record is sufficiently developed, or where the counsel’s performance was so inadequate that the defendant was effectively denied his right to counsel. *United States v. Jeronimo,*398 F.3d 1149, 1155-56 (9th Cir.2005). Neither situation is present here. Accordingly, we decline to review this claim.

We also conclude that the district court did not err in admitting the evidence of his previous conviction of illegal re-entry after deportation. His argument fails here because the Government properly used this evidence to corroborate his admissions of his alienage. *See United States v. Hernandez,*105 F.3d 1330, 1332 (9th Cir.1997).

Additionally, Mondragon-Martell’s claim that the Government did not provide ample evidence of his deportation fails because a warrant of removal can sufficiently identify and prove that he was previously deported. *See United States v. ZepedaMartinez,*470 F.3d 909, 913 (9th Cir.2006) (holding that a warrant of removal “is sufficient alone to support a finding of removal beyond a reasonable doubt”).

Finally, we review Mondragon-Martell’s sentence to determine if it is reasonable, and will only set it aside if it is “procedurally erroneous or substantively unreasonable.” *United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). In this case, we conclude that the district court *606properly considered his health issues and that the sentence imposed was reasonable.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001088771
<NAME>                        Lynch Interactive Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                         21,123
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                      330
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               52,586
<PP&E>                                        150,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                 55,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                245,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          53,633
<BONDS>                                       130,622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                     31,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  245,606
<SALES>                                       155,762
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              155,762
<CGS>                                         133,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 143,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               15,406
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              8,121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,287)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (160)
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,447)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.26)



</TABLE>