alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of China Direct, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Wang, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

                                      /s/ Yuejian (James) Wang
                                      ------------------------
August 8, 2007                        Yuejian (James) Wang, CEO,
                                      principal executive officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0 40 7 PATRICK A. MALLOY, III,

Pl aint iff/Appellant,

vs. BETTINA J. WEILER MALLOY HUNT, PROVIDENCE ST. PATRICK HOSPITAL, PROVIDENCE HEALTH SERVICES, and JOHN DOES 1
- 5,

Defendants/Appellees.
ORDER Upon considerat io n of Appellant ’ s m oti on f or a 30
- day

extensio n of time, and good cause appearing therefrom, Appellant is granted an extensio n of time to and including November 8 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its response brief. Si gned this _____day

of __________, 2023

____________________________________ Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court October 10 2023

10/10/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0407
#### In the Matter of Beatrice L. Corcoran, Petitioner, v Nirav R. Shah, M.D., M.P.H., Commissioner, New York State Department of Health, Respondent.

[988 NYS2d 806]

Froceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County [John J. Ark, J.], entered December 18, 2013) to review a determination of respondent. The determination, among other things, imposed an 18-month delay in petitioner’s Medicaid eligibility.

It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Fetitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination that an 18-month delay in her Medicaid eligibility was properly imposed as a penalty for transferring resources in order to qualify for Medicaid coverage. We confirm the determination. Where a petitioner has transferred assets for less than fair market value, he or she must “rebut the presumption that the transfer of funds was motivated, in part if not in whole, by . . . anticipation of a future need to qualify for medical assistance” *(Matter*
      *1474
      *of Mallery v Shah,*93 AD3d 936, 937 [2012] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see Matter of Donvito v Shah,*108 AD3d 1196, 1198 [2013]). Here, the New York State Department of Health determined that, during the 60-month look-back period, petitioner and her husband made uncompensated transfers of approximately $176,000 to their family members. The evidence presented at the hearing established that petitioner had mobility issues for several years prior to her hospitalization and application for Medicaid, and petitioner failed to submit any medical records to support the allegation that she was in good health. Furthermore, petitioner failed to establish that the transfers were “part of a long-standing pattern,” inasmuch as she presented no evidence that substantial gifts such as the uncompensated transfers at issue were made in prior years *(see Matter of Lipkin v New York State Dept. of Social Servs.,*146 AD2d 964, 964-965 [1989]). Thus, contrary to petitioner’s contention, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the determination that petitioner failed to rebut the presumption that the transfers were motivated, at least in part, by a desire to qualify for Medicaid *(see Matter of Barboto v New York State Dept. of Health, 65*AD3d 821, 822-823 [2009], *lv denied*13 NY3d 712 [2009]).

Present — Centra, J.P, Lindley, Sconiers, Valentino and DeJoseph, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
 
 
 The undersigned, Michael R. Haynes, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Collectors Universe, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Quarterly Report"), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 
 Date:November 14, 2003

/s/ MICHAEL R. HAYNESMichael R. HaynesChief Executive OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Collectors Universe, Inc. and will be retained by Collectors Universe, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of Burger King Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the    period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and    Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, John W. Chidsey, Chief Executive    Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:      1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, as amended; and      2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company. /s/  John    W. Chidsey    John W. Chidsey    Chief Executive Officer     Dated: September 7, 2007
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officers of Janus Resources, Inc. (the “Company”)
do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”)
that:



(i) the Report filed by the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) The information contained in that
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates
and for the periods presented therein.



|                      | JANUS RESOURCES, INC.
|--------------------- | ---------------------
|                      |                      
|Date: August 20, 2012 | By:                  
|                      |                      
|                      |                      
|                      |                      



|Date: August 20, 2012 | By: | /s/ Janet Bien                
|--------------------- | --- | ------------------------------
|                      |     | Name: Janet Bien              
|                      |     | Title: Chief Financial Officer
|                      |     | (Principal Financial Officer) 



This certification accompanies this Report
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Jeffrey A. McCutcheon, hereby certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of LaBranche & Co Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 5, 2010 

 

 
-51-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2480
LISA A. FRISON; ELLIS S. FRISON, JR., Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus RYAN HOMES; NVR, INCORPORATED; KBM FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-350-AW) Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 19, 2005 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. E. Scott Frison, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Jeffrey Marc Mervis, MERVIS & ASSOCIATES, Rockville, Maryland; Bonnie Hochman Rothell, KROOTH & ALTMAN, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lisa A. Frison and Ellis S. Frison, Jr., appeal the district court’s orders denying their request for a temporary restraining order and injunctive relief, granting summary judgment to defendants and awarding sanctions against them pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, and denying their motion for recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Frison v. Ryan Homes , No. CA-04-350-AW (D. Md. filed Feb. 23, 2004 & entered Feb. 24, 2004; filed Oct. 29, 2004 & entered Nov. 1, 2004; Nov. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
LaBranche & Co Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. McCutcheon, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.

|                       |  |  |  |        |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2009 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jeffrey A. McCutcheon                        
|                       |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Jeffrey A. McCutcheon                            
|                       |  |  |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be
retained by LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baroque Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Dietrich,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


By:     /s/Robert Dietrich
        -------------------------
Name:    Robert Dietrich

Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:    February ___, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. McCutcheon, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 5, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey A. McCutcheon
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                     |  | Jeffrey A. McCutcheon                            
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                    |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be retained by LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



-53-
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3433 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3433

  To amend the North American Wetlands Conservation Act to establish 
requirements regarding payment of the non-Federal share of the costs of 
  wetlands conservation projects in Canada that are funded under that 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2009

 Mr. Wittman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the North American Wetlands Conservation Act to establish 
requirements regarding payment of the non-Federal share of the costs of 
  wetlands conservation projects in Canada that are funded under that 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARE OF PROJECTS IN MEXICO AND 
              CANADA UNDER NORTH AMERICAN WETLANDS CONSERVATION ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 8(b)(3) of the North American Wetlands 
Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 4407(b)(3)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(3) The non-Federal share of the United States contribution to 
the costs of such projects may not be derived from Federal grant 
programs. In the case of a project carried out in Canada or Mexico, the 
non-Federal share of the costs of the project may include cash 
contributions from non-United States sources that are used to pay costs 
of the project. In the case of a project carried out in Canada, funds 
from Canadian sources may comprise up to 50 percent of the non-Federal 
share of the costs of the project.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
with respect to any approved and active wetlands conservation project 
(as that term is used in section 8(b)(1) of such Act) carried out with 
assistance provided under such Act, including such a project approved 
before the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Mamuka KVINIKADZE, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-74070.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 6, 2008.

*699Mamuka Kvinikadze, pro se.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Jeffrey David Talbert, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Environmental Enforcement Section, Pamela S. West, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Mamuka Kvinikadze, a native and citizen of Georgia, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s and BIA’s denial of petitioner’s claims on the basis of an adverse credibility finding. *Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 992 (9th Cir. 2003). We grant the petition in part, deny the petition in part, and dismiss the petition in part.

Substantial evidence does not support the IJ’s and BIA’s adverse credibility determination. Kvinikadze plausibly and reasonably explained why he did not include two details from his asylum application — that he was cut during a beating by police and that he took a two-week trip. *See Bandari v. INS,*227 F.3d 1160, 1166-67 (9th Cir.2000) (reversing where IJ based adverse credibility determination on the omission of a detail of petitioner’s persecution from an asylum application).

Kvinikadze’s contention that the IJ’s reliance on the asylum officer’s notes affected his proceedings fails because Kvini-kadze did not specify what prejudice he suffered. *See Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition with respect to this claim.

Finally, we lack jurisdiction to review Kvinikadze’s contention that the IJ was biased, because Kvinikadze failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. *See Sanchez-Cruz v. INS,*255 F.3d 775, 780 (9th Cir.2001). We dismiss the petition with respect to this claim.

We grant the petition with respect to the asylum, withholding of removal and CAT claims, and remand to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

*700PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED in part; DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.