alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3270 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3270

 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
to add New York to the New England Fishery Management Council, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2009

  Mr. Bishop of New York (for himself and Mr. Israel) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
to add New York to the New England Fishery Management Council, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New York Fair Fishing Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. ADDITION OF NEW YORK TO NEW ENGLAND FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL.

    Section 302(a)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation 
and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852(a)(1)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``New York,'' after ``New Hampshire,'';
            (2) by striking ``except'' and inserting ``except New York 
        and except'';
            (3) by striking ``18'' and inserting ``20''; and
            (4) by striking ``12'' and inserting ``14''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47210]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21818]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and 
the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--PAR15-352, Occupational Safety 
and Health Training Projects.
    Date: December 6-7, 2017.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m., EST.
    Place: Teleconference.
    Agenda: The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, 
and evaluation of applications received in response to PAR15-352, 
Occupational Safety and Health Training Projects.
    For Further Information Contact: Michael Goldcamp, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer/CDC, 1095 Willowdale Road, Mailstop H1808, 
Morgantown, West Virginia 26505,(304) 285-5951; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3aea4acafa7a0a2aeb383a0a7a0eda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4b9b3bbb8b0b7b5b9a494b7b0b7fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Claudette Grant,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2017-21818 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[No. 42862-8-II.

Division Two.

October 24, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Gilberto Flores-Garcia, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Lewis County, No. 11-1-00174-6, Richard C. Adamson, J. Pro Tern., entered November 30, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Penoyar, J.,

concurred in by Hunt and Van Deren, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Agile Software Corporation (the Company)
for the quarter ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Carolyn V. Aver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Date: March 5, 2007



| |  |  |  |                                                                     
| |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | /S/    CAROLYN V. AVER                                              
| |  |  |  | Carolyn V. Aver Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
# Meeting Summary Archives - Federal Maritime Commission

- FMC May Meeting Focused on Agency Outreach and Licensing Efforts Demand for cargo and passenger ocean transportation services remains strong post-pandemic and the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) used the open session of its May 2024 meeting to highlight how agency licensing and outreach programs improve supply chain resiliency, protect the public, and ensure proper compliance by shipping companies and marine terminal operators (MTO). While containerized [&#8230;]The post FMC May Meeting Focused on Agency Outreach and Licensing Efforts appeared first on Federal Maritime Commission.
- FMC Announces Hearing on Shipping Conditions in the Red Sea The Federal Maritime Commission will hold an informal public hearing on February 7, 2024, to examine how conditions in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden regions are impacting commercial shipping and global supply chains. The hearing will allow stakeholders in the supply chain to communicate with the Commission how operations have been disrupted by [&#8230;]The post FMC Announces Hearing on Shipping Conditions in the Red Sea appeared first on Federal Maritime Commission.
- FMC Meeting Covers Enforcement Activity, OSRA Implementation, and MTDI The new regionally based structure for the Federal Maritime Commission investigatory program was unveiled at today’s meeting of the Commission where enforcement activity, continued progress in implementing the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA), and the latest status of the Maritime Transportation Data Initiative (MTDI) were all discussed. Enforcement activity was also discussed in a closed session that [&#8230;]The post FMC Meeting Covers Enforcement Activity, OSRA Implementation, and MTDI appeared first on Federal Maritime Commission.
- FMC Meeting Focuses on OSRA Implementation & Data Initiative Posted&#160;September 22, 2022 The Federal Maritime Commission was briefed at its September meeting, held Wednesday, on progress implementing the&#160;Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022&#160;(OSRA) and the findings of the&#160;Maritime Transportation Data Initiative&#160;(MTDI). Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel discussed his work leading the MTDI and shared what this project identified as key data gaps in moving an [&#8230;]The post FMC Meeting Focuses on OSRA Implementation &amp; Data Initiative appeared first on Federal Maritime Commission.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 D0 31 8 . SHARON HEARD v . BRENDETTE L. W ILLI A MS.

A1 9 D0 32 0 . BRENDETTE L. W I LLI AMS v . SHARON HEARD et a l

. A1 9 D0 32 3

. BAKER COU N T Y S C HOOL BOARD A/ K/ A BAKER COUNTY
SCHOOL DI STRI CT v

. BRENDETTE L. W ILLI AMS.

Sh aro n H eard

, Br e n d e t t e L. W i l l i am s , an d t h e Bak er Co un t y Sch o o l Bo ard

h av e al l fi l e d a p p l i c at i o ns fo r d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew fro m t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er

award i n g at t o rn ey fees i n fav o r o f W i l l i am s

. Th e u n d erl y i n g act i o n i n vo l v ed Heard ’ s

p et i t i o n t o co n tes t t he M ay 20 1 6 Dem o crat i c p ri m ary el ect i on fo r a s eat o n t h e Bak er

Co u n t y Bo ard o f E d u cat i o n. Th e Su p rem e Co u rt p rev i o u s l y deci d ed an i n t erl o cu t o ry

ap p eal i n t hi s cas e i n W

i l l i a ms v. Hea r d , 3 0 2 Ga. 1 1 4 (8 05 SE2 d 1 ) (2 0 1 7 ).

Th e Su p rem e Co u rt “ h as ex cl u s iv e ap p el l at e ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er ‘ [a] l l cas es o f

el ect io n co n t es t .’ ” Co ok v. B d

. o f R e g i s t r a r s , 2 91 Ga. 6 7

, 6 8 (2 ) (a) (1 ) (7 2 7 SE2 d

4 7 8 ) (2 0 12 ) (q u o ti n g Ga. Co ns t

. o f 1 9 8 3

, Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II (2 )). Becau s e t h e

u n d e r l yi n g s u bject m at t er o f t h i s act i o n i s an “ el ect i o n co nt es t ,” it ap p ears t h at
ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h es e ap p l i cat i o n s l i es i n t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

. See Da vi s v. Du n n , 2 8 6 Ga. 5 8 2

, 5 82 (6 90 SE2 d 3 8 9 ) (2 0 1 0 ) (ex erci s i n g i t s ju ri sd i ct i o n o v er an at t o rn ey

fee award i n an el ect i o n co n t es t cas e). A s t h e Su p rem e Co u r t h a s t h e u l t i m at e

res p o n s i b i l i t y

fo r d et erm i n in g ap pel l at e ju ri s d i ct i o n, s ee S a xt o n v. Co as t a l Di a l

ys i s February 20, 2019& Med

. Cl in i c, In c. , 2 6 7 Ga. 1 7 7

, 1 7 8 (4 7 6 SE2 d 5 8 7 ) (1 9 9 6 ), t hes e ap p l i cat i o n s are

h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s p os i t i o n.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/20/2019
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andre R. SMITH, a/k/a Erco, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-7573.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 23, 2011.

Decided: April 8, 2011.

Andre R. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States

*259Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andre R. Smith appeals the district court’s order that granted his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence and reduced his total sentence from 270 months to 246 months of imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3017626-APR-201108:02 AM
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > Engagements > Commissioner Bentzel Speaking at Expeditors’ Global Logistics Conference

Commissioner Bentzel Speaking at Expeditors’ Global Logistics Conference


Posted on:


May 15, 2024 May 15, 2024 | Bellevue, WA



Commissioner Carl Bentzel will provide the keynote address at the Global Logistics Conference 2024 hosted by Expeditors where he will speak on the topic of Maritime Infrastructure. Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT O c t obe r 18, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O RT H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 11371 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 5 - 2 0 6 1 3 - C R - MGC U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s R A Y M U N D O F U E R T E S , D e f e n d an t- A p p e llan t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( O c t ob e r 18, 2006) B efo re B A R K E T T , M A R C U S an dW IL S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E RC U R I A M: P hi l i p R ei ze nst ei n, coun se l for R aym un do F uert es i n thi s di re ctcr i m i nal appeal , has m ov ed t o w i thd raw fr om further r epre se nt at i on of the appel l antand h as2

f i l e d abr i e f

pur s uantt o A nde r s v. C a l i f orni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 49 3 (19 67 ). O ur i nd ependentre vi ew of the ent i re re cord revea l s that co u n sel ’ s assessm en to f th e rel at i v e m eri to f th e ap p eal i s co rrect . B ecau se in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls n o ar g u ab le is s u e s o f m e r it, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , and F ue rt e s ’ s c onvi c t i ons and se nt ence s are AF F I RME D.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-60485

Summary Calendar

Phi Thanh Doan, 

Petitioner,

versus

Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A042 197 741

Before Haynes, Willett, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Phi Thanh Doan, a native and citizen of Vietnam, petitions for review 

of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion 

to reconsider after concluding that he failed to demonstrate that he pursued 

his rights diligently and thus was not entitled to equitable tolling of the period 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 8, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-60485 Document: 00515700495 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2021
No. 19-60485

2

to file his motion to reconsider. Doan argues that the BIA abused its 

discretion in determining that he was not entitled to equitable tolling. 

Because Doan does not challenge the BIA’s decision not to exercise its sua 

sponte authority, he has abandoned that claim. See Chambers v. Mukasey, 520 

F.3d 445, 448 n.1 (5th Cir. 2008). 

As an initial matter, the Government argues that we lack jurisdiction 

over the petition for review because Doan is removable for having committed 

an aggravated felony and he has not raised a cognizable constitutional claim 

or question of law. However, because there is no dispute as to the underlying 

facts, the due diligence inquiry is properly construed as a question of law over 

which we have jurisdiction. See Flores-Moreno v. Barr, 971 F.3d 541, 544 (5th 

Cir. 2020), petition for cert. filed (U.S. Nov. 18, 2020) (No. 20-716). 

We review the denial of a motion to reconsider under a highly 

deferential abuse-of-discretion standard. Lowe v. Sessions, 872 F.3d 713, 715 

(5th Cir. 2017). 

A motion to reconsider an order of removal must be filed within 30 

days of the entry of the order. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(B). We have held that 

statutory motions to reopen are subject to equitable tolling, see Lugo-Resendez 

v. Lynch, 831 F.3d 337, 344 (5th Cir. 2016), and Doan asserts that equitable 

tolling principles likewise apply to motions to reconsider. Even if Doan is 

correct in that regard, he has offered no explanation of why it took him more 

than a year to discover that a change in the law meant that he may no longer 

be removable for having been convicted of an aggravated felony nor did he

provide the BIA with any facts or corroborative evidence. See Flores-Moreno, 

971 F.3d at 545; Gonzalez-Cantu v. Sessions, 866 F.3d 302, 305 (5th Cir. 2017). 

Accordingly, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Doan

failed to pursue his rights diligently. See Flores-Moreno, 971 F.3d at 545.

Based upon the foregoing, the petition for review is DENIED.

Case: 19-60485 Document: 00515700495 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2021
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 21

- 00096

- CV
IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF GLADYS MILDRED STORTINI,

AN INCAPACITATED PERSON

From the County Court at Law No

. 2 Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 732

- G

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 29, 2021 , Appellant Frank Allen filed a notice of appeal indicating his desire to appeal from the trial court’s Order Appointing Permanent Guardian of the Person signed on February 12, 2021, Order Creating Management Trust for the Benefit of Gladys Mildred Stortini signed on February 12, 2021, and an Order Granting Permanent Injunction signed on April 23, 2021. By letter dated June 15, 2021, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the docketing statement was past due and must be filed within 21 days from the date of the

letter. The June 15, 2021 , letter warned Appellant that the appeal would be dismissedIn the Guardianship of Stortini Page 2

without f urther notification unless, within 21 days from the date of the letter, a docketing

statement was filed. No docketing statement was received and filed. We also note that

A ppellant ha s not paid for this Court’s fees associated with the appeal , no r has he paid

to have the r eporter’s r ecord prepared. Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the time a document is presented for filing. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 12.1(b); Appendix to T EX

. R. A PP

.
P ., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). S ee also T EX

. R. A PP

.
P . 5; T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 51.207(b); § 51.941(a) (West 2005); and § 51.208 (West Supp.
2011). Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpai d filing fees in this case. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 2. The write

- off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed by Appellant

. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b).

MATT JOHNS ON Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson , and Justice Wright 1 Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed Augu st 4 , 2021 [CV06]

1 The Honorable Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired) of the Eleventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See T EX

. G OV ' T C ODE §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren F. Kruger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  January 19, 2011

/s/ Warren F. KrugerWarren F. KrugerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part of the Report.
**Exhibit 31.****3**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Daniel A. Dodson, hereby certify that:

 

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mastermind, Inc. (the “Company”); |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: July 9, 2020

 

| /s/ Daniel A. Dodson |
|----------------------|

Daniel A. Dodson

Chief Executive Officer

(*Principal Executive Officer*)