alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2007 (Sales) Incentive Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.66 
 Monotype Imaging 
 Dave McCarthy 
 Vice President/General Manager OEM Sales 
 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan

 Overview 
 This Incentive Compensation Plan (the
“Plan”) is based on revenues for the OEM sales division pursuant to the 2007 budget approved by the Board of Directors of Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc. (the “Company”). Certain payments under the Plan will be made on a quarterly
basis and other payments will be made on an annual basis. 
 Quarterly Payments 
 1. For 0-100% of budgeted quarterly amounts: 
  

			
	Core technologies:	 	$[REDACTED]/percentage point
		
	Emerging technologies:	 	$[REDACTED]/percentage point

 2. For more than 100% of budgeted quarterly amounts: 
  

			
	Core technologies:	 	$[REDACTED]/percentage point (subject to an aggregate annual cap of 120% of the budgeted amounts)
		
	Emerging technologies:	 	$[REDACTED]/percentage point (subject to an aggregate annual cap of 150% of the budgeted amounts)

 Annual Payments 
  

	 	•	 	 $[REDACTED] for 105% of total OEM budget amounts 


  

	 	•	 	 $[REDACTED] for 110% of printer related emerging technologies budget amounts 


  

	 	•	 	 $[REDACTED] for 105% of non-printer related emerging technologies budget amounts 


  

	 	•	 	 $[REDACTED] for [REDACTED] new accounts, with at least [REDACTED] of such accounts relating to emerging technologies 


  

	 	•	 	 $[REDACTED] for objectives related to emerging technologies 


 Profit Sharing 
 Mr. McCarthy will be eligible for an additional 401k contribution of 3% of his total eligible 2007 earnings if the
Company achieves 100% of 2007 profit target. 







 Administrative 
 Disputes 
  

	 	•	 	 The resolution of all disputes concerning such items as sales credits, windfalls, interpretation of the terms of the Plan and actual results will be decided solely
by the Board of Directors of the Company, or the Compensation Committee thereof. 


 Other 
  

	 	•	 	 This Plan may be modified at any time during the year at the discretion of the Company and does not constitute a guarantee of employment.



  

	 	•	 	 In the event that Mr. McCarthy’s employment with the Company terminates for any reason before the end of any given quarter, any payments under the Plan
will be prorated based on the percentage of the quarter Mr. McCarthy was employed by the Company. To be eligible for Profit Sharing and any annual payments under the Plan, Mr. McCarthy must be employed through December 31, 2007.



  

							
	 Approved:
	 		  	Accepted:	 	
				
	 /s/ John Seguin
	 	 3/6/07
	  	 /s/ Dave McCarthy
	 	 3/1/07

		 	Date	  		 	Date
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 22, 2022

NO. 03

- 22

- 00263

- CR

Johnny Ray Pierce , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JU STIC ES TRIANA AND SMITH
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed

the record, i t ap pears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal . Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay

costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Burger King Holdings,Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for theperiod ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, John W. Chidsey, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, as amended; and           2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.     /s/ John W. Chidsey       John W. Chidsey     Chief Executive OfficerDated: August 31, 2006A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Burger King Holdings, Inc.and will be retained by Burger King Holdings, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5

<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                               8,594
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     8,594
<PP&E>                                                              96,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      57,215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     338,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            1,263,643
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                            17,998
<OTHER-SE>                                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       338,483
<SALES>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         0
<CGS>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 1,426,037
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  85,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (1,511,103)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (1,511,103)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (1,511,103)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                          (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        (0.09)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23079]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3388-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Seminole Tribe of Florida; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an 
Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the Seminole Tribe of Florida (FEMA-3388-EM), dated September 8, 2017, 
and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 12, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective October 4, 2017.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-23079 Filed 10-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
| 1.     | Such      Yearly Report of Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year      ended December 31, 2008, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of 4301,  Inc. |

| Date:      August 5, 2009                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| 4301,      Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| By: /s/      Yusuke      Matsuo                                            |
| Yusuke      MatsuoChief      Executive OfficerChief      Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and      Director                                                                                                                                                                        |
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
           HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2006-HSA2 (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard B. WHITE; Michael A. Suhadolnik, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 08-3942, 08-3987, 09-3205.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 3, 2011.

BEFORE: NORRIS, COLE, and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Defendants Richard B. White and Michael A. Suhadolnik appeal from the denial of their motion for a new trial or, alternatively, for an evidentiary hearing. In 2003, defendants and three other individuals were charged in a fourteen-count indictment with crimes related to Medicare fraud. White was found guilty on all counts; Suhadolnik was convicted of a single wire fraud count. This court affirmed those convictions on direct appeal. *United States v. White,*492 F.3d 380 (6th Cir.2007). Although we affirmed the convictions, we vacated an order of the district court denying defendants’ motion for a *596new trial and remanded the matter to enable the trial court to conduct an eviden-tiary hearing to determine whether the government withheld material evidence favorable to defendants. On remand, the district court conducted a hearing but denied relief.

Our previous opinion contained an extensive discussion of the events that triggered the underlying prosecution, the evidence produced at trial, and our reasons for affirming the verdicts. By contrast, this appeal is much narrower in scope and presents a single question: Did the documents uncovered by defendants after remand, coupled with the testimony presented during the evidentiary hearing, entitle defendants to a new trial? Having had the benefit of extensive briefing and oral argument, the panel concludes, as did the district court, that the new evidence does not call the validity of the verdicts into question. We have independently assessed that evidence and now affirm the judgment of the district court based upon the reasoning set forth in its opinion filed on July 16, 2008, 2008 WL 2756333.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
#### BRUCE FELDER *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 32209)

Beach, Robinson and Sheldon, Js.

Argued January 30

officially released February 28, 2012

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
#### Wilks JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-55840.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 16, 2011.

Wilks Jackson, San Luis Obispo, CA, pro se.

Amanda Lloyd, Esq., Office of the Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

**The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Wilks Jackson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We dismiss.

Jackson contends that the Board of Prison Terms’ 2005 decision to deny him parole for five years was not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due process rights.

After briefing was completed in this case, this court held that a certificate of appealability is required to challenge the denial of parole. *See Hayward v. Marshall,*603 F.3d 546, 554-55 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc). Now the Supreme Court has held that the only federal right at issue in the parole context is procedural, and the only proper inquiry is what process the inmate received, not whether the state court decided the case correctly. *See Swarthout v. Cooke,—*U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 859, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011) (per curiam). Because Jackson raises no procedural challenges regarding his parole hearing, a certificate of appealability cannot issue. Further, because Jackson has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, we decline to certify the remaining claims. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

DISMISSED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Third Department,

June, 2014

(June 5, 2014)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raul Santiago, Appellant.

[986 NYS2d 361]

Egan Jr., J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered March 15, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted, rape in the first degree.

Defendant was indicted and charged in November 2011 with burglary in the second degree and attempted rape in the first degree. Prior thereto — and having previously been indicted for failing to register as a sex offender — defendant rejected an offer to plead guilty to sexual abuse in the first degree in exchange for a prison sentence of three years followed by eight years of postrelease supervision to resolve all pending charges. Subsequently, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted rape in the first degree in satisfaction of the two indictments, as well as a violation of conditional discharge, and thereafter was sentenced as a second felony offender to a negotiated term of five years in prison followed by eight years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that he received ineffective assistance of counsel by virtue of defense counsel’s failure to inform him of the initial plea offer or to recommend that he accept the offer. Such argument, however, is unpreserved for our review absent evidence of an appropriate *1033postallocution motion *(see People v Beach,*115 AD3d 1117, 1118 [2014]; *People v Trombley,*115 AD3d 1114, 1114 [2014]). Additionally, in the absence of any statements during the plea allocution that would cast doubt upon defendant’s guilt, the narrow exception to the preservation requirement is inapplicable *(see People v Ladieu,*105 AD3d 1265, 1265-1266 [2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 1017 [2013]; *People v White,*104 AD3d 1056, 1056 [2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 1021 [2013]). Finally, to the extent that defendant’s claim involves matters outside the record, this argument is more properly the subject of a CPL article 440 motion *(see People v Morey,*110 AD3d 1378, 1379-1380 [2013]; *People v Veras,*103 AD3d 984, 985 [2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 947 [2013]).

Lahtinen, J.P, McCarthy, Rose and Lynch, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
|                                                                                         |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:           November      9, 2009 |   | /s/      JOSEPH J. WALLACE                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|                                                                                         |   | Joseph      J. Wallace                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                                                                                         |   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|                                                                                         |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|                                                                                         |   | A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to Collectors Universe, Inc. and will be retained by Collectors      Universe, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or      its staff upon request. |

----
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22876]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15326 and #15327; CALIFORNIA Disaster Number CA-
00277]


Administrative Declaration Amendment of Disaster for the State of 
California

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of CALIFORNIA dated 09/26/2017.
    Incident: Helena Fire.
    Incident Period: 08/30/2017 through 10/01/2017.

DATES: Issued on 10/10/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/27/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/26/2018.

ADDRESSES:  Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an Administrative declaration 
for the State of CALIFORNIA, dated 09/26/2017, is hereby amended to 
establish the incident closing date as 10/01/2017.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)


    Dated: October 10, 2017.
Linda E. McMahon,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-22876 Filed 10-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P