alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 208 (Monday, October 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 50161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23550]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

President's Committee on the International Labor Organization 
Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Bureau of International Labor Affairs, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 29, 2017, President Trump continued the 
President's Committee on the International Labor Organization (ILO) for 
two years through September 30, 2019. In response, and pursuant to the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), the Secretary of Labor renewed 
the committee's charter on October 23, 2017.
    Purpose: The President's Committee on the International Labor 
Organization was established in 1980 by Executive Order 12216 to 
monitor and assess the work of the ILO and make recommendations to the 
President regarding United States policy towards the ILO. The committee 
is chaired by the Secretary of Labor and the Department of Labor's 
Bureau of International Labor Affairs is responsible for providing the 
necessary support for the committee.
    The committee is composed of seven members: The Secretary of Labor 
(chair), the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Commerce, the 
Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, the Assistant 
to the President for Economic Policy, and one representative each from 
organized labor and the business community, designated by the 
Secretary. The labor and business members are the presidents of the 
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations 
(AFL-CIO) and the United States Council for International Business 
(USCIB), respectively, as the most representative organizations of U.S. 
workers and employers engaged in ILO matters.

    Authority: The authority for this notice is granted by the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2) and Executive Order 
No. 13811 of September 29, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Robert B. Shepard, Director, Office 
of International Relations, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. 
Department of Labor, telephone (202) 693-4808.

    Signed at Washington, DC.
Martha E. Newton,
Deputy Undersecretary, Bureau of International Labor Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2017-23550 Filed 10-27-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-28-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 207 (Friday, October 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23429]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than November 15, 2017.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. The Martin Grandchildren's Trust dated 5.24.17, with William C. 
Martin and Sally A. Martin as co-trustees; the William C. Martin 2016 
Grantor Retained Annuity Trust dated 1.27.16, with William C. Martin as 
trustee; the William C. Martin 2017 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust 
dated 5.31.17, with William C. Martin as trustee; the William C. Martin 
GRAT Remainder Trust fbo William S. Martin dated 1.27.16, with William 
C. Martin as trustee; the William C. Martin GRAT Remainder Trust fbo 
Michael C. Martin dated 1.27.16, with William C. Martin as trustee; 
Keweenaw, L.L.C., with William C. Martin as manager; Sally A. Martin, 
individually; William S. Martin, individually; and Michael C. Martin, 
individually, all of Ann Arbor, Michigan; to join William C. Martin as 
members of the Martin Family Control Group and retain voting shares of 
Arbor Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of 
Bank of Ann Arbor, both of Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 24, 
2017.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-23429 Filed 10-26-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

CHRISTOPHER BURTON, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D13-2904 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed August 29, 2014. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; William Fuente, 

Judge. 

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

LaROSE, Judge. 

Christopher Burton appeals the postconviction court's order denying his 

motion to correct an illegal sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 

3.800(a). Because Mr. Burton received a mandatory sentence of life without the 
- 2 - 

possibility of parole for a first-degree murder he committed when he was sixteen years 

old, we reverse the portion of the postconviction court's order summarily denying his 

motion and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with Miller v. Alabama, 

132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), and Toye v. State, 133 So. 3d 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). See 

also Baker v. State, 138 So. 3d 1175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Landrum v. State, 133 So. 3d 

601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). 

Reversed and remanded. 

 

KHOUZAM and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS D IVISION O NE

S TATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
LO REN RIVERS, JR. , Petitioner

.

No. 1 CA- CR 21-0030 PRPC

P etition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR 2018-110689-001 The Honorable Howard D. Sukenic , Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney ’ s Office , Phoenix By Amanda M. Parker Counsel for Respondent

L oren Rivers, Jr. , Florence Petitioner

M EMORANDUM DECISION

P residing Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, Judge Jennifer M. Perkins and Judge Maria Elena Cruz delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 8-5-2021STATE v. RIVERS Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Loren Rivers, Jr. seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief

. This is petitioner’s third successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner ha s burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an ab use of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
April 16, 2007


Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D. C. 20549

Commissioners:

We have read Limco-Piedmont, Inc.'s statements in its Form S-1 dated April 16,
2007, under the caption "Change in Accountants" included pursuant to Item 304 of
Regulation S-K. We agree with the statements concerning our firm made in the
second and third paragraphs, the first sentence of the fourth paragraph and the
sixth paragraph. We have no basis to agree or disagree with the first paragraph,
the second and third sentences of the fourth paragraph, and the fifth paragraph.


/s/ Tullius Taylor Sartain & Sartain LLP
Federal Maritime Commission

Plain Writing Act of 2010 Compliance Report

September 29, 2016

Senior Agency Official for Plain Writing:

Karen V. Gregory, Managing Director, , 202-523-5800

Plain Language Website address:

http://www.fmc.gov/about/plain_language_guidelines.aspx

Contact us: secretary@fmc.gov

Status of Agency Communications to be Made Available in a Format that is Consistent 

with the OMB Plain Writing Guidelines

Type	of	Communication,	Document	

or	Posting,	and	How	it	is	Made	

Available	to	the	Public

Intended	User	and	Approximate	

Number	of	Potential	Users

Status

Updates to	website	to	improve	user	

experience

• Entities	regulated	by	the	

FMC	- 6,000	users.

• Members	of	the	public	

impacted	by	the	

regulatory	requirements	–

unknown	number	of	

users.

Metrics	and	user	feedback	were	

used	to	improve	and	generate	

better	organized	content	based	on	

user	needs

Frequently	used	content	was	revised	

to	better	meet	user	expectations.

Proposed	Revision	of	rules	on	ocean	

common	carrier	and	marine	terminal	

operator	agreements

• Entities	regulated	by	the	

FMC	- 6,000	users.

• Members	of	the	public	

impacted	by	the	

regulatory	requirements	–

unknown	number	of	

users.

The	proposed	rule	includes	updates	

to	definitions	to	provide additional	

clarity and	simplified	exemption	

criteria

Ongoing Compliance Activities

• Update	forms	in	use	for	modern	English	and	clarity

• Provide	classroom	training	on	Plain	Language	principles	to	document	creators

• Repurpose	FAQs	as	content	pages

• Reorganize	content	to	make	user	tasks	easier	to	complete

• Provide	improved	print	brochures	and	media	to	customers

• Translate	high-impact	content	for	Low	English	Proficiency	users
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

 Office of the Secretary

 800 North Capitol Street, N.W.

 Washington, DC 20573-0001

Phone: (202) 523-5725

Fax: (202) 523-0014

E-mail: Secretary@fmc.gov

March 21, 2008

The Honorable Russell D. Feingold

United States Senate

506 Hart Senate Office Building

Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Feingold:

Section 641 of The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2005 requires the head of each 

Federal agency to report to Congress on the amount of acquisitions made by the agency from 

entities that manufacture articles, materials, or supplies outside of the United States, and on 

whether any waivers of the requirements contained in the Buy American Act had been granted 

with respect to such articles, materials or supplies, and to provide a summary of the total 

procurement funds spent on goods manufactured in the United States versus funds spent on 

goods manufactured outside of the United States. This letter serves as the report of the Federal 

Maritime Commission (“Commission”) for fiscal year 2007.

As reported to the Federal Procurement Data Center, the Commission obligated 

$420,088 between October 1, 2006, and September 30, 2007, on goods under the different 

manufacturing categories. Most goods were acquired using General Services Administration 

(“GSA”) Federal Supply Schedule vendors. GSA requires compliance with the Buy American

Act requirements in its contracting process. A limited number of publication and information 

technology product purchases were made subject to the Buy American Act exceptions (i.e., 

non-availability in the United States or information technology that is a commercial item). 

No waivers have been granted with respect to such articles, materials or supplies under 

the Buy American Act (41 USC 10(a) et seq.).

Copies of this report are being distributed to the Senate Transportation, Housing and 

Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee, and to the House 

Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations 

Subcommittee. 
2

Section 641 requires that each Federal agency submitting a report shall make the report 

publicly available to the maximum extent practicable. In compliance with this provision, the 

Commission will place the report on the its website at www.fmc.gov.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Anthony Haywood, the 

Commission’s Deputy Director of Administration, at (202) 523-5800.

Sincerely,

Karen V. Gregory

Assistant Secretary

cc: Senate Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and

Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee

House Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and

Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee
#### BROTHER RECORDS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bradley S. ELLIOTT, Defendant, and Bruce Morgan, individually and d/b/a Deck Records, DefendantAppellee.

No. 06-56401.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 8, 2008.*

Filed May 1, 2008.

Edwin F. McPherson, Esq., McPherson and Kalmansohn, David B. Parker, Esq., Michael K. Zweig, Esq., Parker Mills Morin, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Philip H. Still-man, Flynn & Stillman, Cardiff, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Kenneth A. Feinswog, Esq., Kenneth A. Feinswog Law Offices, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant.

Allen Hyman, Esq., Law Offices of Allen Hyman, North Hollywood, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, O’SCANNLAIN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In light of this court’s decision in *Morgan v. Wilson,*Nos. 06-55825, 06-55841, 2008 WL 1924943, we vacate and remand for recalculation of attorneys fees.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Jacobson Resonance Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. Jerry I. Jacobson, Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Jerry I. Jacobson
Jerry I. Jacobson;
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 13, 2004
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000684 28-MAR-2019 08:23 AM
Exhibit Number 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great Western Bancorporation, Inc. (Great Western) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Deryl F. Hamann, Chief Executive Officer of Great Western, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Great Western.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Deryl F. Hamann        
|Deryl F. Hamann, Chairman  
|and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John M. Williams, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 795]

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemploy*948ment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 7, 1996, which, *inter alia,*ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant, the sole shareholder and director of a business machine sales and service corporation, operated the sales division of the corporation and his daughter managed the service division. Due to increased competition resulting in financial difficulties, claimant terminated his employment and transferred his stock to his daughter as a gift. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. We affirm.

Although the sales division ceased operation, the service division continued to be viable. Furthermore, claimant drew a salary until terminating his employment and the corporation continued to employ more employees than just claimant’s daughter. Under these circumstances, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause (see, *Matter of Tepper [Sweeney],*228 AD2d 856; *Matter of Sonin [Sweeney],*226 AD2d 790; *Matter of Sonners [Roberts],*133 AD2d 491).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Pathmark Stores, Inc. Form 10-K For the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007; Exhibit 10.18





Exhibit 10.18


 



 


 


200 Milik Street, Carteret, New Jersey 07008


(732) 499-3930 • Telecopier (732) 499-6891


 


November 28, 2006


 


Mr. Kenneth Martindale


Two 14th Street, Apt. 1111


Hoboken, NJ  07030


 


Dear Ken:


 


This letter amends the Employment Agreement dated December 14, 2005 between you and Pathmark Stores, Inc. (the “Agreement”).  The Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except that the following item in the Agreement has been amended as follows:


 


1.            Effective as of November 28, 2006, Section3.(e)(iii) shall be deleted in its entirety and the following inserted in lieu thereof:


 


“(iii)   The Company shall pay or promptly reimburse the reasonable cost of temporary housing for you and your family within commuting distance of the Company’s executive offices in New Jersey.”


 


Please acknowledge your agreement by executing and returning this original signed amendment.


 





	
             
 	
            Very truly yours,
 
	
             
 	
             
 
	
             
 	
            PATHMARK STORES, INC.
 
	
             
 	
             
 	
             
 
	
             
 	
             
 	
             
 
	
             
 	
            By:
 	
            /s/ John T. Standley
 
	
             
 	
             
 	
            John T. Standley
 
	
             
 	
             
 	
            Chief Executive Officer
 





 


Agreed to and accepted


this 28th day of November, 2006.


 


 





	
            /s/Kenneth Martindale
 
	
            Kenneth Martindale
EXHIBIT 32



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Intermix Media, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the SEC on or
about the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Richard M. Rosenblatt, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas J. Flahie, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |                                                      
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Richard M. Rosenblatt                            
|                      |  | Richard M. Rosenblatt                                
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|                      | 
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Thomas J. Flahie                                 
|                      |  | Thomas J. Flahie                                     
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer                              
|                      |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

BODYMEDIA, INC.,

Appellant

v.

BASIS SCIENCE, INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1788

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,376.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DAVID CLAY HOLLOWAY, Kilpatrick Townsend & 

Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also 

represented by ROBERT J. CURYLO, MICHAEL S. PAVENTO,

RENAE WAINWRIGHT. 

J. DAVID HADDEN, Fenwick & West, LLP, Mountain 

View, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by 

CAROLYN CHANG, AMY HAYDEN. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, LINN, and STOLL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 July 12, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court