alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 67535-4-I.

Division One.

October 22, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Patrick Allen Wycough, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 10-1-09612-1, Jay V. White, J., entered August 12, 2011. *Remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Quest Oil Corporation, a Nevada
      corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the Period ended June 30, 2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, James B. Panther, II, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







/s/
                James B. Panther, II
              James
                B. Panther, II
              President
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              
              August
                21, 2006
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > FTDO > Commissioner Sola Meets with Mayor Sandy Stimpson in Mobile, Alabama

Commissioner Sola Meets with Mayor Sandy Stimpson in Mobile, Alabama


Posted on:


February 1, 2024 Commissioner Louis E. Sola visited Mobile, Alabama, in late January where he met with Mayor Sandy Stimpson to discuss the port’s growth in Mobile.



The Port of Mobile has a significant positive impact on the local community, as it serves as a catalyst for economic growth, employment opportunities, and the expansion of tourist networks.



According to the Alabama State Port Authority, the port generates over three hundred thousand employment opportunities and holds an economic evaluation of eighty-five billion dollars. The Port of Mobile is supported by a workforce committed to excellence.



Furthermore, Mayor Stimpson conveyed his commitment to the port’s shore power project, an effort to identify sustainable solutions for the Port of Mobile’s electricity requirements. This project is an example of ways the maritime industry is embracing innovation to achieve reductions in carbon emissions.



Commissioner Sola expressed his appreciation for the city’s commitment to the Port of Mobile. The success of the port relies on key industry stakeholders dedicated to port investments and operational efficiencies.



*Louis E. Sola is a Commissioner with the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission. The thoughts and comments expressed here are their own and do not necessarily represent the position of the Commission.* Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
Exhibit 99.2









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Luna Medical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brent Shaw, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Brent Shaw



Brent Shaw

Acting Chief Executive Officer

February 26, 2003
#### Dewey Deraid GULLICK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOCK, Deputy Warden; State of Arizona Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 10-15409.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 24, 2011.

Dewey Deraid Gullick, Tucson, AZ, pro se.

Kent Ernest Cattani, Chief Counsel, Robert Anthony Walsh, Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondents-Appel-lees.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Arizona state prisoner Dewey Deraid Gullick appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Gullick contends that the district court erred by denying equitable tolling of AED-PA’s one-year statute of limitations. In light of Gulliek’s ability to file other petitions, represent himself at a hearing, and the reports on his mental condition during the relevant time period, Gullick has failed to demonstrate that his mental condition caused his untimely filing. *See Gaston v. Palmer,*417 F.3d 1030, 1034-35 (9th Cir. 2005), *modified on other grounds,*447 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir.2006). Further, any inadequate assistance Gullick received from other inmates is not an extraordinary circumstance that warrants equitable tolling. *See Chaffer v. Prosper,*592 F.3d 1046, 1049 (9th Cir.2010) (per curiam).

Finally, Gullick contends that, because the state courts incorrectly denied his state petitions as untimely, statutory tolling renders his federal petition timely. When a post-conviction petition is untimely under state law, that is the end of the matter for statutory tolling purposes. *See*
      *763
      *Pace v. DiGuglielmo,*544 U.S. 408, 414, 417, 125 S.Ct. 1807, 161 L.Ed.2d 669 (2005).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Search Home
 About
 Bureaus and Offices
 Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services
 On this page
Parties Requesting CADRS Services
Requesting Dispute Resolution Services
Request a Speaker
Additional Resources
Contact



Do you have a problem with ocean shipping or a cruise? Consider resolving disputes in real-time using the Office of Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services’ (CADRS) alternative dispute resolution services. With no fees for services, CADRS offers: ombuds assistance, mediation, facilitation, and arbitration to resolve challenges and disputes involving:



Cargo Shipment Assistance



Household Goods Shipment



Cruise Passenger Assistance







Parties Requesting CADRS Services


Shippers



NVOCCs and ocean freight forwarders



VOCCs



Cruise Operators and passengers



Truckers



Marine terminal operators (including port authorities)



Requesting Dispute Resolution Services


When requesting assistance, please complete the appropriate form, add any supporting documentation, and submit it to complaints@fmc.gov.



Dispute Resolution Service Request – Cruise (FMC-32) [PDF, 436 KB]



Dispute Resolution Service Request – Cargo (FMC-33) [PDF, 378 KB]



Request a Speaker


To request a CADRS staff member to speak at your next function please contact CADRS.



Additional Resources


International Association of Movers Social Cafe Blog Re: OTI Licensing Requirements



NCBFAA Webinar – Federal Maritime Commission Programs, Initiatives, and Dispute Resolution



Interagency Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Working Group



Contact


**Zoraya De La Cruz, Director****Phone:** 202-523-5807**General questions:**Inquiries@fmc.gov



**Assistance with cargo and cruise problems:** complaints@fmc.gov Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00336-CR

Gary Allen Dunn, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 64750, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Gary Allen Dunn was convicted on a plea of guilty to driving while intoxicated.

Sentence was assessed at nineteen years in prison. The trial court has certified that this is a

plea bargain case and that Dunn has no right of appeal. The trial court also certified that Dunn

waived his right to appeal. Accordingly, we are required to dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). This appeal and all motions pending in it are dismissed.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed

Filed: August 3, 2010

Do Not Publish
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SOHRAB HAROONIAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

COMMITTEE OF BAR EXAMINERS; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 56035

D.C. No. 2:16

- cv

- 02995

- VBF

- SS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2017 **

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Sohrab Haroonian appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising out of

his failure to pass the California Bar Exam. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 26 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 56035

§ 1291. We review de novo

. Carmona v. Carmona , 603 F.3d 1041, 1050 (9th Cir.

2010) (application of the Rooker

- Feldman doctrine); Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v.

Civish , 382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal on the basis of Eleventh

Amendment immunity) . We affirm.

The dist rict court properly dismissed Haroonian’s claims for damages

against the State Bar of California and the Committee of Bar Examiners because

those defendants are entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity. See Hirsh v.

Justice s of the Supreme Cour t of Cal. , 6 7 F.3d 708, 715 (9th Cir. 1995) (the State

Bar of California is an arm of the state and is entitled to Eleventh Amendment

immunity); Lupert v. Cal

. State Bar , 761 F.2d 1325, 1327 (9th Cir. 1985) ( suit

against the Board of Governors of the California Bar and the Committee of Bar

Examiners is barred by the Eleventh Amendment ).

The district court properly concluded that it lacked subject matter

jurisdiction under the Rooker

- Feldman doctrine over Haroonian’s declaratory

relief claim because his claim amounte d to a “forbidden de facto appeal” of the

California Supreme Court’s denial of Haroonian’s application for admission to the

state bar. See Noel v. Hall , 341 F.3d 1148, 11 63

- 65 (9th Cir. 2003) (discussing

Rooker

- Feldman doctrine) ; see also Dist

. o f Columbi a Court of Appeals v.3 16

- 56035

Feldman , 460 U.S. 4 62

, 486 (1983) (district court lacks jurisdiction over challenge

to denial of bar admission, which is a challenge to a state court decision).

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT
32.3**
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
 
 I, David
L. Sokol, Chief Executive Officer of MidAmerican Funding, LLC (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the
best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
      December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.Dated:
      February 28, 2005/s/
      David L. SokolDavid
      L. SokolChief
      Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. CP17-494-000; CP17-495-000]

      ( print page 49016)    
The environmental staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has scheduled a teleconference with representatives of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde to discuss the proposed Jordan Cove Energy and Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline Projects. This meeting will be held on October 24, 2017 at 12:00 p.m. (EDT).

Members of the public and intervenors in the referenced proceedings may attend the meeting; however, participation will be limited to tribal representatives and Commission staff. A summary of the meeting will be prepared and filed in the Commission's administrative record. If tribal representatives choose to disclose information about a specific location which could create a risk or harm to an archeological site or Native American cultural resource, the public will be excused for the portion of the meeting when such information is disclosed.

                    If you would like to attend the meeting, please contact Mr. John Peconom, Environmental Project Manager, for the call-in information. Mr. Peconom can be reached by telephone at (202) 502-6352 or by email at                     *john.peconom@ferc.gov.*

Dated: October 16, 2017.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-22922 Filed 10-20-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22909]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, 
November 13, 2017, 01:00 p.m. to November 13, 2017, 04:00 p.m., 
National Institutes of Health, 6710 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 
20892 which was published in the Federal Register on October 03, 2017, 
82 FR 46084.
    The meeting date has changed from November 13, 2017, 1:00 p.m. to 
4:00 p.m. to November 27, 2017, 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The meeting is 
closed to the public.

    Dated: October 17, 2017.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-22909 Filed 10-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jacobson Resonance Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr.
Jerry I. Jacobson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ Jerry I. Jacobson
                                                ---------------------
                                                    Jerry I. Jacobson;
                                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                                    Principal Financial Officer

August  19, 2002
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONI, Stephen J. Schoepfer, Chief Financial Officer of JAG Media Holdings, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2007 of JAGMedia Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in the report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: June 19, 2007         /s/ Stephen J. Schoepfer   Stephen J. Schoepfer   Chief Financial Officer
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 23

- 00 256

- CV

IN RE MADISON MILLER

Original Proceeding

From the 21st District Court

Burleson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 30654

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Relator Madison Miller on August 25,

2023, is denied.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson , and

Justice Smith

(Chief Justice Gray dissenting)

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed January 1 8 , 2024

[OT06]