alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FLRA NEWS

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY - WASHINGTON, DC 20424

________________________________________________________________________________

Contact: Richard P. Burkard www.flra.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

202-218-7279 January 14, 2020

THE FLRA SEEKS COMMENTS ON PROPOSED REGULATION CHANGE

On December 23, 2019, the Federal Labor Relations Authority (the FLRA) published a Notice 

in the Federal Register announcing intended revisions to the regulations governing negotiability 

appeals to better “expedite proceedings,” consistent with Congress’s direction, and with the FLRA’s 

goal in its strategic plan to “ensure quality, timely . . . decision-making processes.” The proposed 

revisions in the Federal Register are designed to streamline the adjudication process for negotiability 

appeals, resulting in more timely decisions for the parties. Written comments on the proposed 

revisions must be received on or before January 22, 2020, which is only eight days away. The FLRA

encourages all interested persons to submit comments on the proposed revisions. Instructions for 

submitting comments are included in the Notice:

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-12-23/pdf/2019-27193.pdf.

###

The FLRA administers the labor-management-relations program for 2.1 million non-Postal federal 

employees worldwide, approximately 1.2 million of whom are represented in 2,200 bargaining 

units. It is charged with providing leadership in establishing policies and guidance related to 

federal-sector labor-management relations and with resolving disputes under, and ensuring 

compliance with, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 4, 2008

Augusta Resource Corporation

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: Augusta Resource
Corporation

I, Dr. Conrad Huss, do hereby
consent to the filing of the written disclosure of the technical report entitled
Rosemont Copper Project Feasibility Study dated August 24, 2007 for the
Rosemont Project located in Pima County, Arizona in the Form 40-F Annual Report
and the Annual Information Form of Augusta Resource Corporation (the Company)
dated March 4, 2008.

I also consent to the use of my
name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report and Annual Information Form dated
March 4, 2008 and to the use of the name M3 Engineering & Technology
Corporation, in my capacity as Executive Vice President and Chairman of the
Board of M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation.

| | By: | */s/
      Conrad Huss*                                 
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Dr. Conrad Huss, P.E., Ph.D                             
| |     | Executive Vice President and Chairman of the
      Board
| |     | M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation                 
| |     | Tucson, Arizona                                         

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Trust.

Date: January 14, 2011



|              
|--------------
|/S/ NICK BONOS
|Nick Bonos*   

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive
officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal executive officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 1.     | Such      Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31,2007, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year      ended December 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of 43010,      Inc. |

| Date:        August 4, 2008                                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                      |
| 43010,      Inc.                                                          |
|                                                                      |
| By:      /s/      Michael      Raleigh                                    |
| Michael      Raleigh Chief      Executive Officer, Chief FinancialOfficer |
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  Hoaomblo T. II, Trimblr Nrrt Arslrt8nt sat* suprrlat adeat 

## hlrtla, teur Dear BlrLrr He are la rrodpt la pu requort our oplnio

aotor vhataoovor. Aotr 1.909, p. 88, Aetr 1915, p. 149,'

# -- .__,.

-__-_-- ”

. ;: - - Em . A oamfd rosa- a tha abaa &state 

### UmUaor.tkat

the Iam. errwtr oalf s 8ltuatia 

### whore the penor spp0iak.d 18 rrlatodulthln the Drohlblte4G&roa ta the mraoa~ppol8tin(blrorto~oo~ru~eithosp~int~~. Ia the lnrknoo d&h you lnqulro 

### l **bou%, the**  

### Olty Otimloa doea not 

### appoint thm taohu. 

### tom8 tint **funot1oa.** 

### T& Board a Trurtaa pIrc So **Sar** l8 7’ ~ lettu lil8oloror, than **I$ no&l~~i~**  **betw8ra tbo**  toaohor anb **may mbu**  of the Board

. Artiole 434, PA., oordrnr the evmrioa of Artlola4Se b~ttmtrdi~ af 8ppoiatmaitr butpur 

### lettor doer not rha that such hu beamdOa0 la thb la8taao~. The l 

### ktutu do aot o oadan

the 

### l **ppolataaat** rhioh you matloa uzdu tha raota submitted and TOW question is thorMore **aamuod** in thm msatlro.

.,ATTORbn0IBY5IULlI?TIUAS .
#### In the Matter of Deborah Knapp, Respondent, v Brian Levy, Appellant.

[667 NYS2d 563]

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Family Court did not err in failing to include rental income in computing respondent’s 1995 gross income for the purposes of the Child Support Standards Act (CSSA) because respondent sustained a net loss on the rental property (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [b] [5] [ii]). The court also properly deducted unreimbursed employee expenses of $9,695 from respondent’s gross income, the amount reported on respondent’s 1995 Federal income tax return (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [b] [5] [vii] [A]). In addition, the court properly exercised its discretion in excluding from respondent’s gross income a one-time payment given to respondent by his employer for a vehicle that he won in a contest (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [b] [5] [iv] [B]). The court, however, deducted the incorrect amount for FICA taxes paid; the correct amount is $3,794, as reflected on respondent’s W-2 form (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [b] [5] [vii] [H]). Thus, respondent’s income for the purposes of the CSSA is $68,129, and respondent’s child support obligation is 17% of that amount (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [c] [2]).

Respondent contends that the court erred in calculating his pro rata share of the basic child support obligation, eliminating the variance from that obligation granted by the Hearing Examiner. We disagree. Pursuant to Family Court Act § 413 (1) (f), the court must order the noncustodial parent to pay his or her pro rata share of the basic child support obligation unless it finds that the pro rata share is unjust or inappropriate, based upon consideration of factors such as extraordinary expenses incurred by the noncustodial parent in exercising visitation or “expenses incurred by the non-custodial parent in extended visitation provided that the custodial parent’s expenses are substantially reduced as a result thereof’ (Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [f] [9] [ii]). Upon finding that respondent took care of the child one third of the time, the Hearing Examiner reduced respondent’s child support obligation by one-third. That was error, and Family Court properly so found. This type of routine, custody-sharing situation does not constitute “extended visitation”. In any event, respondent failed to estab*1028lish that he incurs any expenditures due to such “extended visitation” with the child or that petitioner’s expenses are substantially decreased thereby. Thus, the court properly eliminated the variance awarded by the Hearing Examiner.

Therefore, we modify the order of Family Court by directing that respondent’s child support obligation is $223 per week. (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Sciolino, J.—Support.) Present—Denman, P. J., Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Teresa SMITHERMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-10824

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 2, 2008.

Camille Elizabeth Sparks, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John W. Sweeney, Jr., Fort Worth, TX, for D ef end ant-App ell ant.

*406Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Teresa Smitherman appeals the 97-month sentence imposed by the district court following her guilty plea conviction for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute and aiding and abetting. She argues that the sentence is unreasonable and that the district court did not give reasons for denying her motion for a sentence below the applicable guideline range. She argues that a sentence below the guideline range was appropriate in this case because she distributed methamphetamine only to support her own habit; she was involved with the codefendants for only approximately three months; she did not personally know the drug supplier; she had only two prior misdemeanor convictions; she cooperated fully with state and federal authorities; and while incarcerated, she voluntarily enrolled in a drug treatment program.

The Government argues that review is limited to plain error because Smitherman did not object to the reasonableness of her sentence at the close of the sentencing hearing. The court need not decide the appropriate level of review because, as explained below, the district court’s reasons for imposing a sentence with the advisory guidelines range were sufficient even if the claim was preserved.

Because Smitherman’s sentence was within the applicable guideline range, it is entitled to a presumption of reasonableness and lengthy explanation of the sentence was not required. *See Gall v. United States,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); *see also Rita v. United States,*— U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007). Smitherman does not argue that the district court improperly calculated the applicable guideline range. The district court stated that it considered the information and arguments presented by Smitherman, the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), as well as the need for serious penalties due to the effect of methamphetamine upon people’s lives. Smitherman has not shown that the district court failed to consider her arguments, that the district court erred in calculating the guideline range, or that the sentence imposed by the district court was unreasonable. *See Gall,*128 S.Ct. at 597. Accordingly, the judgement of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4344-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of California (FEMA-4344-DR), dated October 10, 2017, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued October 12, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of California is hereby amended to include Individual Assistance for the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of October 10, 2017.

Sonoma County for Individual Assistance (already designated for debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], including direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-23069 Filed 10-23-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 3

                              State of Delaware
                      Office of the Secretary of State            PAGE 1
                               --------------


     I, EDWARD J. FREEL, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
BUSINESS TRUST REGISTRATION OF "PREMIER AUTO TRUST 1999-3", FILED IN THIS
OFFICE ON THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, A.D. 1999, AT 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M.










                                        /s/ Edward J. Freel
                                        -----------------------------------
                      [ SEAL ]          Edward J. Freel, Secretary of State


3056050 8100                            AUTHENTICATION: 9803394
991238431                               DATE: 06-14-99






                            CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                     OF
                          PREMIER AUTO TRUST 1999-3

         THIS Certificate of Trust of Premier Auto Trust 1999-3 (the "Trust")
is being duly executed and filed by Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware, a Delaware
banking corporation, as trustee, to form a business trust under the Delaware
Business Trust Act (12 Del C ss 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").

         1.   Name: The name of the business trust formed hereby is Premier
Auto Trust 1999-3.

         2.   Delaware Trustee: The name and business address of the trustee
of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware, 1201
Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attention: Corporate Trustee
Administration Department.

         3.   Effective Date: This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
upon its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.


                                    CHASE MANHATTAN BANK DELAWARE, not in
                                    its individual capacity but solely as
                                    trustee.


                                    By: /s/ J.J. Cashin
                                    -----------------------------
                                    Name:    JOHN J. CASHIN
                                    Title:   VICE-PRESIDENT



                                                        STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                       SECRETARY OF STATE
                                                    DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
                                                    FILED 08:30 AM 06/14/1999
                                                       991238431 - 3056050
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-50945

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARK DAVID MCCARTY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:09-CR-195-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Mark David McCarty has appealed the district court’s order revoking his

supervised release. McCarty contends that the district court violated his right

to due process in failing to enter a written order specifying the evidence it relied

upon in revoking his supervised release and in failing to specify which violations

it relied upon. Because McCarty did not raise these questions in the district

court, this court’s review is for plain error. See United States v. Gonzalez, 250

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 25, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-50945 Document: 00511214137 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/25/2010
No. 09-50945

F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir. 2001); see also Puckett v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 1423,

1429 (2009).

McCarty admitted the allegations in the petition for warrant or summons

for offender under supervision, and he was given an opportunity to offer

mitigating evidence. See United States v. Holland, 850 F.2d 1048, 1050-51 (5th

Cir. 1988). He contested only two facts, repayment of the $100 loan and

violation of the cell-phone rule; the remaining allegations, with respect to failure

to make restitution, violation of the prescription-drug rules, and failure to

maintain lawful employment, were not contested. There was no error, plain or

otherwise. See id.

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 09-50945 Document: 00511214137 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/25/2010
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23169]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-NERO-PAGR-24368: PX.PR166532I.00.1]

Cancellation of the October 12, 2017, Meeting of the Paterson 
Great Falls National Historical Park Advisory Commission

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Cancellation of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice 
is hereby given that the October 12, 2017, meeting of the Paterson 
Great Falls National Historical Park Advisory Commission previously 
announced in the Federal Register, Vol. 81, December 9, 2016, pp. 
89145-89146, is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Further information concerning 
meetings may be obtained from Darren Boch, Superintendent and 
Designated Federal Officer, Paterson Great Falls National Historical 
Park, 72 McBride Avenue, Paterson, New Jersey 07501, (973) 523-2630 or 
email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 9-member Commission was established by 
16 U.S.C. 410lll(e). The purpose of the Commission is to advise the 
Secretary of the Interior in the development and implementation of the 
management plan.

Alma Ripps,
Chief, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-23169 Filed 10-24-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
```
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Oliver Creek Resources
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended January 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Bruce
Thomson, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: July 24, 2008                      By: /s/ Bruce Thomson
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Bruce Thomson
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.