alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the quarterly report of PalWeb Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending November 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert H. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


May 3, 2005                            /s/ Robert H. Nelson
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert H. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer


            A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

            The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered
filed as part of the Report.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George M.L. LaBranche, IV, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |        |  |                                                
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/ George M. L. LaBranche, IV                 
|                   |  | Name:  |  | George M.L. LaBranche, IV                      
|                   |  | Title: |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be retained by
LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 The undersigned, Michael R. Haynes, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Collectors Universe, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:May 17, 2004

/s/ MICHAEL R. HAYNESMichael R. HaynesChief Executive OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Collectors Universe, Inc. and will be retained by Collectors Universe, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amazon Biotech, Inc., a Utah
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Angelo Chinnici, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Angelo Chinnici
------------------------------------------------
Angelo Chinnici, M.D., Chief Executive Officer
March 22, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

931 

CA 15-00357 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

DEANNA ZEGARELLI-PECHEONE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF THOMAS ZEGARELLI, 

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

 

NEW HARTFORD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

THE LAW FIRM OF FRANK W. MILLER, EAST SYRACUSE (FRANK W. MILLER OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel

D. Hester, J.), entered June 10, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed

from, denied in part defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying in part its

motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendant’s

employees questioned plaintiff’s son during an investigation of an

incident that had occurred a few days earlier during a football game

on school grounds. Plaintiff thereafter commenced this action

alleging, among other things, that defendant’s confinement of her son

to an administrator’s office and the nurse’s office during the

investigation constituted false imprisonment. In her bill of

particulars, plaintiff alleged in further detail that her son’s

confinement was for an unreasonable and excessive period of time,

during which he was threatened, verbally harassed, and given

misleading information, with the result that he made a false admission

of wrongdoing. Supreme Court denied defendant’s motion for summary

judgment dismissing the cause of action for false imprisonment but

granted the motion with respect to two other causes of action. We

affirm.

To establish a cause of action for false imprisonment, a

“plaintiff must show that: (1) the defendant intended to confine him,

(2) the plaintiff was conscious of the confinement, (3) the plaintiff

did not consent to the confinement and (4) the confinement was not

otherwise privileged” (Broughton v State of New York, 37 NY2d 451,

456, cert denied sub nom. Schanbarger v Kellogg, 423 US 929). 

Defendant contends that the court erred in denying that part of its

motion seeking dismissal of the cause of action for false imprisonment
-2- 931 

CA 15-00357 

inasmuch as defendant’s confinement of plaintiff’s son was privileged. 

We reject that contention. A confinement such as the one at issue

herein is privileged only if it is reasonable under the circumstances,

including its duration and manner (see Barrett v Watkins, 82 AD3d

1569, 1571-1572; see generally Sindle v New York City Tr. Auth., 33

NY2d 293, 297). We conclude on this record that defendant’s

submissions failed to establish that its confinement of plaintiff’s

son was reasonable as a matter of law (see generally Zuckerman v City

of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Peters v Rome City Sch. Dist. [appeal

No. 2], 298 AD2d 864, 865).

Entered: October 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alarion Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jon M. Kurtz, Principal Executive Officer, President, and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: March 29, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jon M. Kurtz                         
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Jon M. Kurtz, Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baroque Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Fryer,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.





By:     /s/Stephen Fryer
        -------------------------
Name:      Stephen Fryer
Title:     Chief Executive Officer
Date:      February ___, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. McCutcheon, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey A. McCutcheon
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                     |  | Jeffrey A. McCutcheon                            
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                    |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be retained by
LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         113,945
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               374,777
<PP&E>                                      20,306,724
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,113,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,784,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          974,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,148
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,470,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,784,957
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,180,986
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,058,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,398,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (275,579)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (275,579) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (275,579)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark A. Mooney, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 532]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree should be reversed because the prosecutor failed to file a special information pursuant to CPL 200.60. We disagree. Although the prosecutor did not file a special information charging that defendant was previously convicted of a specified offense, defendant admitted that he had previously been convicted of a crime and agreed to plead guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. The prosecutor’s failure to file the special information was therefore waived by defendant’s voluntary guilty plea *(see, People v DiCarluccio,*168 AD2d 509, 510, *lv denied*77 NY2d 877). We further conclude that defendant’s sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Allegany County Court, Sprague, J.—Attempted Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Wisner and Boehm, JJ.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes
      - Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Professional Lease Management Income Fund
      I, L.L.C., (the “Fund”), on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), the undersigned, the President of the Manager and of the Fund, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)  the
      Report of the Fund filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.














/s/ Paul
      M. Leand


Paul
      M.
      Leand


President
      of PLM Financial Services, Inc.


June
      6,
      2006
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-13-00263-CV 

BYRON MORGAN, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

D&S MOBILE HOME CENTER, INC. 

AND SHAWN FULLER, APPELLEES 

 

On Appeal from the 99th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2012-503,563, Honorable William C. Sowder, Presiding 

 

October 3, 2013 

 

ORDER 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

Appellant Byron Morgan filed a notice of appeal on August 7, 2013, but failed to 

pay the $175 filing fee required under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5. We 

informed Morgan, by letter dated August 8, 2013, that the filing fee was outstanding and 

that the appeal would be dismissed unless it was paid within ten days from the August 

8th letter. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); see Holt v. F.F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. 

App.–Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d). The fee was not paid, and the record failed to show 
2

Morgan to be indigent or having requested leave to proceed as an indigent. Therefore, 

the cause was dismissed via opinion issued on September 6, 2013.

On September 9, 2013, Morgan filed a motion to “reinstate” the appeal along with 

the filing fee.1 However, on September 13, 2013, Shawn Fuller, one of the defendants 

in the cause, filed a response opposing the motion. He based his opposition on the 

ground that a final judgment had yet to be filed; that is, he believed that the judgment 

disposed of the claims asserted against only one defendant, D&S Mobile Home Center, 

Inc. Nothing in the judgment pertained to Fuller. On September 19th, this court advised 

appellant that action would be withheld on his motion to reinstate and also directed him 

to address whether a final, appealable judgment had been filed disposing of all claims 

and parties. In his response, Morgan produced another judgment that reveals (when 

coupled with the judgment pertaining to D&S Mobile Home Center) that all claims 

against all parties were disposed of by the trial court. 

Therefore, we grant Morgan’s motion to reinstate and vacate our prior order 

dismissing the appeal.

Per Curiam

 

1 We treat the motion as one for rehearing.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, John A. Vella, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding Trust 2006-AR1 (the
     "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee.

     Dated: July 14, 2008

     /s/ John A. Vella
     Signature

     President and CEO
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the servicer)
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3427 

AN ACT 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to protect States 

that have in effect laws or orders with respect to pay 

to play reform, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3427 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Ethics Law Pro3 tection Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PAY TO PLAY REFORM. 

5 Section 112 of title 23, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(h) PAY TO PLAY REFORM.—A State transpor8 tation department shall not be considered to have violated 

9 a requirement of this section solely because the State in 

10 which that State transportation department is located, or 

11 a local government within that State, has in effect a law 

12 or an order that limits the amount of money an individual 

13 or entity that is doing business with a State or local agen14 cy with respect to a Federal-aid highway project may con15 tribute to a political party, campaign, or elected official.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3427 

AN ACT 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to protect 

poses. spect to pay to play reform, and for other purStates that have in effect laws or orders with re-