alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Gamestate Entertainment, Inc.**
 
 **Certification of Chief Financial Officer**
 
 I, Cameron King, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gamestate Enterainment, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The registrants certifying officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5. The registrants certifying officer has disclosed, based on his most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or person performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a s ignificant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 
 6. The registrants other certifying officers have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date: August 17, 2004/s/ Cameron KingCameron KingCFO
#### Tobias I. BACA, aka Tobias Baca, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert N. EWING; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-16491.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 2, 2010.

Tobias I. Baca, pro se.

*287Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Tobias I. Baca appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, *Ash v. Cvetkov,*739 F.2d 493, 495 (9th Cir.1984), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action without prejudice for lack of prosecution because Baca failed to comply with Arizona Local Rule 3.8(a) and failed to appear in response to the court’s order to show cause. *See id.*at 496-97 (listing factors to consider before dismissing an action for lack of prosecution and explaining that “[a] relatively brief period of delay is sufficient to justify” a dismissal without prejudice for failure to prosecute). Accordingly, we do not address Baca’s contentions about the merits.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Pete R. Pizarro, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report of eLandia International Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eLandia International Inc.



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 15, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Pete R. Pizarro    
|                     |  |     |  | Pete R. Pizarro        
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 19-13985

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:05-cr-00104-HLA-MCR-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff -Appellee,

 versus

JACETA ANYA STREETER, 

a.k.a. Star, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(April 7, 2020)

Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Gerald Scott Bettman, appointed counsel for Jaceta Anya Streeter in this 

direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation 

Case: 19-13985 Date Filed: 04/07/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2

of Streeter, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s 

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent 

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s 

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Streeter’s revocation of supervised release 

and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 19-13985 Date Filed: 04/07/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.5



|                                                                                                                                                   |  |  |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|State of Delaware Secretary of State Division of Corporations Delivered 07:04 PM 06/15/2005 FILED 06:58 PM 06/15/2005 SRV 050501785 - 3919647 FILE |  |  |  | 



CERTIFICATE OF
AMENDMENT TO THE

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF MYSPACE, INC.



Christopher DeWolfe
hereby certifies that:



ONE: The date of
filing of the original Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware was February 10, 2005.



TWO:He is the duly elected and acting President of MySpace, Inc., a Delaware corporation.



THREE:The Board of Directors of the corporation,
acting in accordance with the provisions of Sections 141 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, adopted resolutions amending its Certificate of Incorporation as follows:



Article IV, Section A is hereby amended and restated as follows:



The Company is authorized to issue two classes of stock
to be designated, respectively, Common Stock. and Preferred Stock The total number of shares that the Company is authorized to issue is sixty million nine hundred thirty thousand (60,930,000) shares, sixty million
(60,000,000) shares of which shall be Common Stock (the Common Stock) and nine hundred thirty thousand (930,000) shares of which shall be Preferred Stock (the Preferred Stock) The Preferred Stock shall have a par value of
one-tenth of one cent ($0.001) per share and the Common Stock shall have a par value of twenty-five thousandths of one cent ($0.00025) per share



FOUR:Thereafter, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors, this Certificate of Amendment was submitted to the
stockholders of the Corporation for their approval, and was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.



FIVE:All other provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation shall remain in full force and effect.



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Corporation has caused this
Certificate of Amendment to be signed by its President this 15thday of June 2005.



MYSPACE, INC.By:

/S/    CHRISTOPHER
DEWOLFEChristopher DeWolfe, President
NO. 12-09-00428-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

SIMMONS THEODORE YLIYAH NA’BI,

APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 87TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

SANDRA TITLOW, ' ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

On December 10, 2009, Simmons Theodore Yliyah Na’bi filed a notice of appeal 

seeking to appeal “the trial court’s final judgment entered on an unknown date.” On the 

same date, this court notified Na’bi that the information received in this appeal does not 

contain a final judgment or other appealable order. Na’bi was further informed that the 

appeal would be dismissed if the information received in the appeal was not amended on 

or before January 11, 2010 to show the jurisdiction of this court. The deadline for 

amendment has passed, and Na’bi has neither responded to the December 10, 2009 notice 

or otherwise shown the jurisdiction of this court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3.

Opinion delivered January 13, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 358 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 358

            For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2009

Mr. King of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ALEMSEGHED MUSSIE TESFAMICAL.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Alemseghed Mussie 
Tesfamical shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical enters 
the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection 
(c), he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical, 
the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 
1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Alemseghed 
Mussie Tesfamical shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Joan P., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[665 NYS2d 683]

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Westchester County (Braslow, J.), dated March 13, 1995, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court entered February 23, 1995, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of arson in the second degree, adjudged her to be a juvenile delinquent and placed her on probation for one year. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order entered February 23, 1995.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(cf., People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the finding that the appellant, while acting in concert with another, committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of arson in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 150.15). Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(cf., People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(cf., People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the fact-finding order was not against the weight of the evidence *(cf.,*CPL 470.15 [5]). Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.
#### Josephine LAZERANO, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2009-7133.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 25, 2011.

*898Before RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves without opposition to vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and to remand for further proceedings.

The appellant filed a notice of appeal with the Court of Veterans Claims more than 120 days after the Board of Veterans’ Appeals mailed its decision in her case. That court dismissed the appeal as untimely, concluding that the 120-day appeal period established by 38 U.S.C. § 7266(a) for seeking review of Board of Veterans’ Appeals decisions is jurisdictional and not subject to equitable tolling. The appellant sought this court’s review.

This court stayed the briefing schedule in this appeal pending the United States Supreme Court’s review of our decision in *Henderson v. Shinseki,*589 F.3d 1201 (Fed.Cir.2009) (en banc) (affirming Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims determination that period to appeal to that court is not subject to equitable tolling). In *Henderson ex rel. Henderson v. Shinseki,*-U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1197, 179 L.Ed.2d 159 (2011), the Supreme Court reversed this court’s decision and concluded that the 120-day deadline for filing an appeal with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims does not have jurisdictional consequences. Because the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims erred in concluding that the appeal deadline established by § 7266(a) is jurisdictional, we vacate the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
Exhibit 32.1  Section 1350 Certification  In connection with the quarterly report of China Direct, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Yuejian (James) Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  May 8, 2008
        /s/ Yuejian (James) Wang
 Yuejian (James) Wang  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Frederick D. Ludwig, Appellant, v Gary A. Brink, Appellant, and Town of Mount Morris, Respondent.

[669 NYS2d 116]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Cicoria, J. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Cicoria, J.— Dismiss Complaint.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7366

WARREN CUTHA HESTER, II, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

BECKLEY REGISTER HERALD, newspaper company; WOAY-TV, 

television station/broadcasting company; AUDREY STANTON, 

reporter, Beckley Register Herald, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, 

District Judge. (5:07-cv-00891) 

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 3, 2009 

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Warren Cutha Hester, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Warren Cutha Hester, II, appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and 

related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Hester v. Beckley Register Hearld, No. 

5:07-cv-00891 (S.D.W. Va. July 8, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### In re Millard P. THOMAS, III, Debtor. Lauren A. Helbling, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Millard P. Thomas, III, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

BAP No. 13-8052.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit.

Filed May 15, 2014.

ON BRIEF: Lauren A. Helbling, Cleveland, OH, for Appellant. James E. Kovac, Cleveland, OH, for Appellees.

Before: EMERSON, HARRISON, and LLOYD, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges.

*114OPINION

MARIAN F. HARRISON, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue before the Panel on appeal is whether the bankruptcy court erred in holding that real property transferred in error to Debtor by his Father pre-petition was impressed with a constructive trust as a matter of law, and thus, the bankruptcy estate had no interest in the real property. The Panel reviews this conclusion of law *de novo. See In re Booth,*260 B.R. 281, 285 (6th Cir. BAP 2001); *First Union Mortg. Corp. v. Eubanks (In re Eubanks),*219 B.R. 468, 469 (6th Cir. BAP 1998) (citation omitted). After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and applicable law, the Panel concludes that the bankruptcy court did not err. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the bankruptcy court’s well-reasoned opinion entered on November 12, 2013, *Helbling v. Thomas, (In re Thomas),*Ch. 7 Case No. 12-14916, Adv. No. 13-1012 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 2013) ECF No. 66, we affirm.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of LianDi Clean Technology Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Jianzhong Zuo, the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jianzhong
      ZuoJianzhong
      ZuoChief
      Executive Officer and President(Principal
      Executive Officer)




June 25,
2010
EX-35 (a)
(logo) GMAC Mortgage


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

ACE2006-SL1


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby
certify that:

1.      A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all
material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 6th
day of March 2007.


By:     /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
Title:  Executive Vice President


GMAC Mortgage, LLC
500 Enterprise Road
Horsham, PA 19044

www.gmacmortgage.com