alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FLRA NEWS

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY - WASHINGTON, DC 20424

Contact: Eric Prag FLRA.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 771-444-5859 October 12, 2023

The FLRA’s Revised Negotiability Regulations Take Effect and the FLRA Releases a 

Training Video about the Regulatory Revisions

Today, the Federal Labor Relations Authority’s (the Authority’s) substantively revised 

Negotiability Regulations take effect. The Rule updated the adjudication process for 

negotiability appeals, and is intended to benefit the Authority’s parties by clarifying various 

matters and streamlining the negotiability process, thereby enabling the Authority to provide the 

parties with more timely decisions. The Authority’s eFiling system has been updated to reflect 

the changes to the Regulations.

A webinar—2023 Changes to the Negotiability Regulations—has also been released by the 

Authority, which provides information about the revised Negotiability Regulations. The training 

video covers modifications to certain terms and filing deadlines; the procedures for separating 

proposals and provisions into distinct parts; and the new requirement that parties must provide 

the Authority with the details necessary to understand their positions.

The video is posted on FLRA’s YouTube channel, as well as in FLRA’s video training library.

2023 Changes to the Negotiability Regulations

 

For more information on the FLRA - Authority, click here.

###

The FLRA administers the labor-management relations program for 2.1 million non-Postal federal 

employees worldwide, approximately 1.2 million of whom are represented in 2,200 bargaining 

units. It is charged with providing leadership in establishing policies and guidance related to 

federal sector labor-management relations and with resolving disputes under, and ensuring 

compliance with, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00285-CR

William C. Brown

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1356206D)

February 18, 2016

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Anne Gardner_________________

 Justice Anne Gardner
CERTIFICATIONS  I, Wilson Cheung, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Super Luck, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have: (a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)         designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements, for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)         all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: March 13, 2008 /s/ Wilson CheungWilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Collins, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 866]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.—Attempted Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Wisner and Boehm, JJ.
#### CHUNHUA DENG, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-71986.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*636Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 1, 2008.

Douglas G. Ingraham, for Petitioner.

Kevin J. Conway, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, CACDistriet Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Chunhua Deng, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and her motion to reopen proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the BIA’s decision to deny asylum and withholding of removal and CAT, and for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *see Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Deng failed to meet her burden of proof with respect to asylum and withholding of removal. We give special deference to a credibility finding that is based on demeanor. *See Singh-Kaur v. I.N.S.,*183 F.3d 1147, 1151 (9th Cir.1999). Because the IJ had reason to question Deng’s testimony, it was proper for the IJ to require corroborating evidence to support her claim. *See Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1045 (9th Cir.2001).

Deng necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal, because she failed to establish eligibility for asylum. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156-1157 (9th Cir. 2003). Because Deng’s CAT claim is based on the same statements found to be not credible, and she does not point to any other evidence in the record that would compel a finding that it would be more likely than not that she would she would be tortured if returned to China, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT. *See id.*

The BIA abused its discretion in denying Deng’s motion to reopen to address her possible entitlement for adjustment of status based on her marriage because she provided evidence that, if believed, would show her marriage was bona fide, and she was not given an opportunity to explain the circumstances of her divorce in China. *See Malhi,*336 F.3d at 994; *see also Ghadessi v. INS,*797 F.2d 804, 806-07 (9th Cir.1986) (faulting BIA for weighing quality, rather than sufficiency of evidence, in a motion to reopen).

Deng’s motion for judicial notice is granted.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part and GRANTED in part; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
## On this page

        - About 
        - How to File a FOIA Request 
        - FOIA Logs 

## About

----

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) generally provides that any person has right to obtain access to federal agency records, except to the extent that such records (or portions of them) are protected from public disclosure.

The Federal Maritime Commission proactively makes a great deal of information available to the public, reducing the need to file an official FOIA request. This includes, but is not limited to:

            - A list of licensed ocean transportation intermediaries
            - Agreement filings
            - Commonly used forms
            - Commission decisions; final and proposed rules; Commission regulations
            - News releases

A complete list of available information can be found at 46 CFR Part 503.

## How to File a FOIA Request

----

When submitting a FOIA request, put the words “FOIA Request” in the subject line. FOIA requests must be directed to the Secretary of the Commission and may be submitted by either:

**Email**: FOIA@fmc.gov

**Mail**:Secretary (FOIA)Federal Maritime Commission800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573

**Fax**: 202-217-3170

When submitting a request, provide as much detail as possible and reasonably describe the record(s) sought pursuant to the criteria outlined in 46 CFR Part 503. It is important to include your contact information in the request.

FOIA provides for the charging of fees applicable to the processing of requests. Therefore, please authorize a specific dollar amount that we should not exceed when processing your request. Should the amount you authorize be reached prior to completing the processing of your request, we will contact you prior to proceeding.

Appeals of denials by the Secretary may be filed with the Chairman. Also, the Office of Government Information Services (OIGS) offers mediation services to resolve disputes between FOIA requesters and Federal agencies.

Additional FOIA information is available through the links below.

            - FOIA Annual Reports and Chief FOIA
            - Officer Reports
            - FMC FOIA Reference Guide  [PDF, 202 KB]
            - DOJ Guide to the FOIA

## FOIA Logs

----

            - FY 2023 FOIA Log  [PDF, 87.3 KB]
            - FY 2022 FOIA Log  [PDF, 54.4 KB]
            - FY 2021 FOIA Log  [PDF, 40.8 KB]
            - FY 2020 FOIA Log  [PDF, 57.4 KB]
            - FY 2019 FOIA Log  [PDF, 19.2 KB]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3509 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3509

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To reauthorize State agricultural mediation programs under title V of 
                  the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agricultural Credit Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 506 of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (7 U.S.C. 5106) 
is amended by striking ``2010'' and inserting ``2015''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 18, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3509

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To reauthorize State agricultural mediation programs under title V of 
                  the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987.
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**SECTION 302CERTIFICATIONI, Stephen J. Schoepfer, Chief Financial Officer of JAG Media Holdings, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2008 of JAGMedia Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in the report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 24. 2008       /s/ Stephen J. Schoepfer         Stephen J. Schoepfer    Chief Financial Officer
No. 06- 14 -00223- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

DALE DEWAYNE FISHER APPELLANT

VS

STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF OF APPELLANT

TO HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

NOW COMES, the Appellant by and through his Attorney, Tim Cone, and does

hereby move this Honorable Court to grant an extension of time for the purpose of filing

the Appellant’s Brief.

I.

Judgment was entered with the 115 th District Court of Upshur County, Texas, in

Cause Number 16,741 styled The State o f Te xa s vs. Dale Dewayne Fisher, on the 12 th

day of November, 2014. The Appellant’s brief is due on March 13, 2015

. This is the

Appellan t’s first request for an exte nsion of time for the late filing of Appellant’s brief

. ACCEPTED
06-14-00223-CR
SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS
3/12/2015 11:45:41 PM
DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERKThat the Appellant hereby requests an extension of time to fi l e Appe llant’s brief

until April 13 , 2015 , and will hopefully be the last extension we will ask for and as

reason therefore, would show th e court as follows : Appellant’s attorney has recently

submitted a brief i n Cory Martin Colvin v. State, C ase Number 06

- 14

- 00163

- CR to the

Sixth Court of Appeals. Further, Appellant’s attorney was preparing for jury trials in

the 115 th District Court for t he two we ek session beginning February 9 , 2015 : State v.

Carlos Bunch, Jr., Cause Number 12503; State v. Alton Ray Easley, Jr., Cause Numbers

16346,16499 and 16647; S tate v. David Bruc e Williams, Cause Number 16580 ; State v.

Mary Ellen Clark, Ca use Number 1 6723 ; State v. Christoph er Alan Ray, Cause Number

16,784; State v. Kelly Wayne Haney, Cause number 16,881; State v. Stefoni Elyse

Knox, Cause Number 16,854;State v. Jerry Dean Becht, Cause Number 16,907; and

State v. Lester Shane Browning, Cause Number 16, 875

. Further, Appellant’s attorney

was preparing for jury trials i n the 124 th District Court of Gregg County for the weeks of

February 16, and February 23, 2015: State v. Billy Ray Williams, Cause Number

42,225

- B and State v. Alvin Bernard Allen, Cause Number 44,257

- B. Further,

Appellant ’ s attorney has been preparing a brief in State v. Roderick King, Case Number

06

- 14

- 00166

- CR.

..

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersi gned counsel

respectfully prays that the Honorable Court of Appeals extend the time for the filing of

Appellant’s Brief in this cause to the 13th da y of April , 2015

.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/Tim Cone

______________________________ Tim Cone, Attorney At Law

State Bar N. 04660350

P.O. Box 413 Gilmer, Texas 75644

903

- 725

- 6270

e

- mail: timcone6@aol.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certi fy that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has b een served t o Natalie Miller, Assistant Cri minal District Atto rney for Upshur County , attorney for Appellee,

o n this the 12th day o f M arch , 201 5

.

/s/Tim Cone_____________________________ Tim Cone, Attorney At Law
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00314-CV

Kalsoom Ahmad

v.

Sanjay Mathur

§

§

§

§

From the 324th District Court

of Tarrant County (324-494783-11)

May 8, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

/s/ Lee Gabriel

By _________________________________

 Justice Lee Gabriel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S 1996 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           9,763
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,236
<INVENTORY>                                     52,050
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,355
<PP&E>                                          97,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,706
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,751
<SALES>                                        366,991
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               366,991
<CGS>                                          311,345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  311,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,203
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,564
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,639
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  RG  America,  Inc.,  a  Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  John E.
Rea, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,  does hereby certify,  pursuant
to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ John E. Rea
---------------------------
John E. Rea
Principal Executive Officer
May 23, 2005

                                       26