alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > Engagements > Commissioner Dye Addressing American Home Furnishings Alliance

Commissioner Dye Addressing American Home Furnishings Alliance


Posted on:


May 15, 2024 May 15, 2024  |  Washington, DC  |



Commissioner Rebecca Dye will address members of the American Home Furnishings Alliance (AHFA) participating in the organization’s annual Congressional outreach event.  More information on the AHFA can be found on the organization’s website. Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001088789
<NAME>                                         Archer Systems Limited, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         149
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,410
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22,407
<BONDS>                                        24,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (45,448)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,559
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,711)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,711)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.5(d)

AMENDMENT TO THE

FINLAY ENTERPRISES, INC.

1997 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

WHEREAS, Finlay Enterprises, Inc. (the “Corporation”) maintains the Finlay Enterprises, Inc. 1997 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9.5 of the Plan, the Corporation, through action of its Board of Directors, may amend the Plan at any time; and

WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to extend the term of the Plan indefinitely subject to stockholder approval.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective February 27, 2007, by adding the following new paragraph to the end of Section 9.15:

Notwithstanding any other provision herein, subject to the authority of the Board to terminate the Plan at any time under Section 9.5 hereto, the Plan shall not terminate on March 5, 2007 and shall instead be extended indefinitely, subject to approval at the next annual meeting of the Corporation’s stockholders at which a quorum is present, by the affirmative votes of a majority of the Corporation’s voting securities, present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting, in accordance with applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law. In the event the Corporation’s stockholders fail to approve this Amendment or a successor plan, then any Awards granted under the Plan after March 4, 2007 shall be forfeited and cancelled.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed this 27th day of February, 2007.

 


	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        FINLAY ENTERPRISES, INC.
 
	
                          
 	
                         
 	
                        By 
 	
        

          

          /s/ Arthur E. Reiner

      
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        Arthur E. Reiner
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00308

- CV

Charise Caudle

v.

Oak Forest Apartments §

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 3

of Tarrant County (2013

- 005811

- 3)

December 17, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was no

error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

SE COND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot

______________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Zachary THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-30511

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 22, 2011.

Camille Ann Domingue, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rebecca Louise Hudsmith, Esq., Federal Public Defender, Joseph R. Streva, Jr., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Zachary Thomas pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and possession of firearms in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. He was sentenced to, inter alia, a 120-month prison term on the drug trafficking count and, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(i), a consecutive 60-month prison term on the related firearms conviction. Thomas filed a timely notice of appeal.

*407In his sole issue for review, Thomas argues that the district court erred in sentencing him to a mandatory five-year minimum sentence under § 924(c)(l)(A)(i) when the predicate drug offense carried a greater minimum sentence. This argument has been rejected by both this court and the United States Supreme Court. *Abbott v. United States,*— U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 18, 22-23, 178 L.Ed.2d 348 (2010); *United States v. London,*568 F.3d 553, 564 (5th Cir.2009), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 631, 178 L.Ed.2d 507 (2010). Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Office of Inspector General 

Washington, DC 20573-0001 

March 15, 2012 

 

Office of Inspector General 

 

TO: Chairman Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. 

 Commissioner Joseph E. Brennan 

 Commissioner Rebecca F. Dye 

 Commissioner Michael A. Khouri 

 Commissioner Mario Cordero 

FROM: /Adam R. Trzeciak/ 

 Inspector General 

SUBJECT: IPERA Reporting 

On July 22, 2010, the President signed into law the Improper Payments Elimination and 

Recovery Act (IPERA; Pub. L. 111-204). IPERA amended the Improper Payments 

Information Act of 2002 (IPIA; Publ. L. 107-300). Each agency inspector general is 

tasked with reviewing improper payment reporting in their agency’s annual Performance 

and Accountability Report (PAR) to determine if the agency is in compliance with IPIA. 

If an agency does not administer programs and/or activities that may be susceptible to 

significant improper payments, the Office of Management and Budget recommends that 

the IG submit a short letter to the agency head, Congress, GAO and OMB stating that it 

did not have anything to review under IPERA. Reports or letters are due within 120 days 

of the PAR issuance date (i.e., March 15, 2012). 

Improper payments are payments that should not have been made or that were made in an 

incorrect amount (including overpayments or underpayments); and includes any payment 

to an ineligible recipient, any payment for an ineligible good or service not received, and 

any payment that does not account for credit for applicable discounts. 

The Federal Maritime Commission’s Office of Inspector General reviewed the agency’s 

most recent PAR (November 15, 2011) for compliance with IPIA. FMC management 

reported in the PAR that the agency does not administer programs or activities that may 

be susceptible to significant improper payments, and considers all of its payments to be 

low risk for improper payment. Consequently, the OIG did not review any transactions 

to assess IPIA compliance.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR3 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

|   |   | /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann                                                                        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  ThomasG. Lehmann                                                                 |
|   |   | Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor |
EXHIBIT 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Poseidis,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  November  30,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Louis
Pardo dit Pardau,  Chief  Executive  Officer (or  equivalent  thereof) and Chief
Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof) of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.





/s/ Louis Pardo dit Pardau
-----------------------------------------------
Louis Pardo dit Pardau
Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
January 14, 2004
FLRA NEWS

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY - WASHINGTON, DC 20424

Contact: Eric Prag FLRA.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 771-444-5859 March 31, 2023

Alicia Weber named Regional Attorney of FLRA Chicago Regional Office

Today, the Office of the General Counsel (OGC), Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA),

has announced the appointment of Alicia Weber as the Regional Attorney of the FLRA’s 

Chicago Regional Office. In this position, Ms. Weber will assist Chicago Regional Director Greg 

Weddle in the management of personnel and operations relating to the investigation and 

resolution of unfair-labor-practice and representation cases in the Chicago Region, which covers 

Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio, Puerto 

Rico, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.

Ms. Weber began her career in the OGC Washington Regional Office in 2010 and thereafter 

transferred to the Chicago Region where she was a Senior Attorney for several years. She served 

as the Deputy Bureau Chief for the Civil Rights Bureau of the Illinois Attorney General, as an 

associate at a law firm, and in various positions at a labor union. She was a Peggy Browning 

Fellow during law school. Ms. Weber received both her Bachelor of Arts and Juris Doctor from 

Northwestern University.

The Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is the independent investigative and prosecutorial 

component of the FLRA. Through its five Regional Offices, the OGC investigates, settles, and 

prosecutes unfair labor practice charges, resolves representation disputes, including the conduct 

of secret ballot elections, and provides training to union and management representatives.

For more information on the OGC and its leadership, click here.

###

The FLRA administers the labor-management relations program for 2.1 million non-Postal federal 

employees worldwide, approximately 1.2 million of whom are represented in 2,200 bargaining 

units. It is charged with providing leadership in establishing policies and guidance related to 

federal sector labor-management relations and with resolving disputes under, and ensuring 

compliance with, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [189A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900 253G]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The notice announces that the Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact between the Pueblo of Pojoaque and State of New Mexico is taking effect.

# DATES:

This notice is applicable as of October 26, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by IGRA and 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Secretary took no action on the compact between the Pueblo of Pojoaque and the State of New Mexico within 45 days of its submission. Therefore, the Compact is considered to have been approved, but only to the extent the Compact is consistent with IGRA.                     *See*25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(C).                

Dated: October 23, 2017.

 Gavin Clarkson,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Policy and Economic Development—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2017-23343 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 29, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Warren F. Kruger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


April 14, 2008                             /s/ Warren F. Kruger
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Warren F. Kruger
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered
filed as part of the Report.
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

FLRA Form 43

(Rev. 1/81)

 

WITHDRAWAL REQUEST

In the matter of___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

 (Name of Case)

__________________________________

 (Case No.)

_________________________________________________________

 (Name of Party Filing)

By _________________________________________________________

 (Print or type Name of Representative)

_________________________________________________________

 (Title)

_________________________________________________________

 (Signature)

_________________________________________________________

 (Date)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

This is to request withdrawal of the above-named case.

WITHDRAWAL REQUEST APPROVED

Federal Labor Relations Authority

________________________________________

 Regional Director

Dated:___________________________________

Region
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Howard Mapp, Appellant.

[667 NYS2d 265]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Cr urt, Kings County (Bruno, J.), rendered June 17, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, *308upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Kreindler, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence as probable cause for the defendant’s arrest was sufficiently established *(see, Spinelli v United States,*393 US 410; *Aguilar v Texas,*378 US 108; *People v Parris,*83 NY2d 342, 349).

The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review the majority of his present challenges to remarks made by the prosecutor during his summation inasmuch as he either failed to object or voiced only general objections to the comments *{see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Dien,*77 NY2d 885; *People v Utley,*45 NY2d 908, 910). To the limited extent that his contention regarding one remark has been preserved for appellate review, the court’s curative instruction effectively dissipated any prejudice (s*ee, People v Walker,*185 AD2d 867).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not warrant reversal. Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.