alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35 (i)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 12, 2007

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation
85 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-2F

Per Section 3.02a of the Standard Terms to Master Servicing & Trust Agreement,
dated as of 2/1/2006, the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
(Master Servicer), hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or
portion thereof:

(i)     A review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year
        or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement,
        or such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional
        Servicer, has been made under such officer's supervision.

(ii)    To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer, in
        all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if
        there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
        respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the
        nature and status thereof.

(iii)   Notwithstanding anything herein to contrary (and noting that, to the
        extent of any inconsistency, any and all other statements,
        certifications or assertions herein are subject to the following):
        instances of noncompliance related to the subject transaction for the
        applicable reporting period are identified on Schedule A hereto.

Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary

(page)


Schedule A

Reporting Errors

During the reporting period, one or more of the monthly investor reports
contained certain types of errors in regard to the calculation and or the
reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets. To the best of the signing
officer's knowledge, each such error, which may or may not have been material,
has been identified and remedied and any related corrective action has been
disclosed in a report previously filed with the SEC in respect of the reporting
period.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report of China Marketing Media Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhen Zhen Peri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/Zhen Zhen PeriZhen Zhen PeriChief Financial Officer




November 29, 2011




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Marketing Media Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by China Marketing Media Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, 

v.

LOREN RIVERS, JR., Petitioner. 

No. 1 CA-CR 21-0030 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2018-110689-001 

The Honorable Howard D. Sukenic, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Amanda M. Parker 

Counsel for Respondent 

Loren Rivers, Jr., Florence

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, Judge Jennifer M. Perkins and Judge 

Maria Elena Cruz delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 8-5-2021
STATE v. RIVERS

Decision of the Court

2 

PER CURIAM: 

¶1 Petitioner Loren Rivers, Jr. seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is 

petitioner’s third successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is 

petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 

537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of 

establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Form 10-Q/A for NetScreen
Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Remo E. Canessa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the quarter covered by the
Report.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    REMO E. CANESSARemo E. Canessa Chief Financial Officer NetScreen Technologies, Inc.Date:

August 15, 2003




This certification accompanies
this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 35.1**

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify to WaMu AssetAcceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2006 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee,  the following with respect to Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2006-2 Trust for the 2006 fiscal year  (the “RelevantYear”): 

1.                  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has beenmade under my supervision.

 

2.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the ServicingAgreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

                                                                                                      /s/ H. John Berens

| ___________________________________________

Name:  H. John BerensTitle:    Senior Vice President |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imagis Technologies Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I,
Wayne Smith, Vice President Finance and Chief Operating Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                       /s/ Wayne Smith
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Wayne Smith
                                       Vice President Finance, Chief
                                          Operating Officer
                                       (Principal Financial and
                                          Accounting Officer)
                                       November 14, 2003


<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imagis Technologies Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I, Roy
Trivett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                       /s/ Roy Trivett
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Roy Trivett
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)
                                       November 14, 2003
EXHIBIT
23.1

Consent of Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

As independent petroleum
engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our Firms
name and our Firms review of the proved oil and gas reserve quantities as of
December 31, 2007 in the following Form 10-Ks of Ridgewood Energy Corporation:

Ridgewood Energy K Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy L Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy M Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy O Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy P Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy Q Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy S Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy T Fund, LLC

|               |                               
|-------------- | ------------------------------
|               | /s/ Ryder Scott Company,
 L.P.
|               |                               
|               | Ryder Scott Company, L.P.     
|March 11, 2008 |                               

---
#### RUIDE ZHEN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-74246.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 5, 2008.

Danning Jiang, Esq., Law Offices of Danning Jiang, San Jose, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Portland, OR, Lisa M. Arnold, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, Respondent.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ruide Zhen, native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his *714motion to reopen removal proceedings in order to apply for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *Ordonez v. INS,*345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Zhen’s motion to reopen because he did not present any new, previously unavailable evidence to warrant reopening of the proceedings. *See id.*at 785.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of China Marketing Media Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Yingsheng Li, President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Yingsheng LiYingsheng LiPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer


April 18, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Marketing Media Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by China Marketing Media Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert H. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


October 17, 2005                       /s/ Robert H. Nelson
                                       ---------------------------
                                       Robert H. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered
filed as part of the Report.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel Priciciliano PONCE-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10058.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 14, 2011.

Randall M. Howe, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Florence Bruemmer, Law Offices of Florence M. Bruemmer, PC, Anthem, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Joel Priciciliano Ponce-Ramirez, pro se.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Joel Priciciliano Ponce-Ramirez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 21-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ponce-Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for re*714lief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss the appeal in light of the valid appeal waiver. *See United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# FILED
May 29, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON
SHERMAN A. HENDERSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9612-CC-00477 ) vs. ) LAKE COUNTY ) BILLY COMPTON, WARDEN, ) No. 96-7428 ) Respondent. )

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court u pon the state’s motion to dismis s the above-captioned appeal. The peti tioner filed a petition for w rit of habeas corpus in the trial court claiming that his sentence should be recalculated due to the de nial of certain sentencing credits. It

appears the petitioner w as originally con

victed of first degree murder and sentenced to life impri sonment in January, 1980. The tr ial court denied the petition. The petitioner timel y filed notice of appeal, and both t he record and petitioner’s brief have al ready been filed with thi s Court.

In its motion, the state argues that the trial court properly denied relief in this case because it does not appear from the face of the judgment or rec ord that the petitioner’s convict ion is void. See Archer v. State , 851 S.W.2d 157, 164 (Tenn. 1993). The state further contends that the is sue raised by the petiti oner is not a proper consideration for habeas corpus relief, but rather m ust be challenged under the Uniform Administrative Procedur es Act. We agree. See Brigham v. Lack , 755 S.W.2d 469, 471 (Tenn. Crim. App.), perm. to appeal denied , (Tenn. 1988); State v. Warren , 740 S.W.2d 427, 428 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1986), perm. to appeal denied , (Tenn. 1987).

Accordingly, finding

no error of law mandating reversal, it is h ereby ORDERED that the judgment o f the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 20 , Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.2 Enter, this the ___ day of May , 1997.

_____________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUD GE

_____________________________ JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE

_____________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, JUDG E
EX-34 (e)
EXHIBIT C

(logo) Grant Thornton

Accountants and Business Advisors


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors and Shareholders
LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria ("Management's
Report"), that LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc. (the "Company") complied
with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage backed
securities for which the Company served as third-party property tax payment
provider on the underlying collateral (the "Platform") as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv),
1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(x) and
1122(d)(4)(xiii)-(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services,
Inc. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Irvine, CA
February 20, 2007


18400 Von Karman Avenue
Suite 900
Irvine, CA 92612-0525
T 949.553.1600
F 949.553.0168
W www.grantthornton.com

Grant Thornton LLP
US member of Grant Thornton International
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Journey Resources Corp. - Exhibit 4.5





















































































































































































































SCHEDULE B

ROBINSON LEASE































































































































































































































Exhibit A to Consent of the Lessor

Option Agreement