alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of William EE., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Chemung County Department of *814Social Services, Respondent; Barbara EE., Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 783]

Crew III, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Chemung County (O’Shea, J.), entered June 15, 1995, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to adjudicate William EE. a permanently neglected child, and terminated respondent’s parental rights.

Respondent is the biological mother of William EE. (born in 1981), who has been in foster care since May 1990. Respondent was charged with committing various sex offenses against her son and, in November 1990, apparently pleaded guilty in Pennsylvania to the crime of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse in the first degree and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 5 to 10 years. Thereafter, in July 1993, petitioner commenced the instant proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b seeking to have William adjudicated a permanently neglected child and to terminate respondent’s parental rights. Ultimately, a fact-finding hearing was conducted in March 1995 in respondent’s absence, apparently due to the refusal or inability of the Pennsylvania correctional facility where she was incarcerated to produce her. At the conclusion of the dispositional hearing that followed, Family Court granted the petition and this appeal by respondent ensued.

Respondent’s counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment upon the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised on appeal. We agree. As a starting point, given that the Pennsylvania correctional facility at which respondent was incarcerated was either unable or unwilling to produce her for the fact-finding and dispositional hearings, and taking into consideration, *inter alia,*the uncertainty surrounding the duration of respondent’s incarceration and the amount of time that William already had spent in foster care, we find no error in Family Court’s decision to proceed in respondent’s absence *(see generally, Matter of Jennifer DD.,*227 AD2d 675; *cf., Matter of Raymond Dean L.,*109 AD2d 87, 90). Additionally, based upon our review of the record as a whole, we are satisfied that petitioner exercised diligent efforts to reunite respondent with her son *(see,*Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]).

Finally, inasmuch as respondent’s only apparent plan for her son’s future was long-term foster care, we cannot say that Family Court erred in adjudicating William to be a permanently neglected child and terminating respondent’s parental rights *(see generally, Matter of Abdul W.,*224 AD2d 875, 876 [long-term foster care is not a viable plan]). Accordingly, Family *815Court’s order is affirmed and counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, *Matter of Dart v Howell,*237 AD2d 825).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 208 (Monday, October 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 50151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health; Notice 
of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the ZAT1 AJT (05) 
Exploratory Clinical Trials of Mind and Body Interventions.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Exploratory Clinical 
Trials of Mind and Body Interventions Review Panel.
    Date: December 1, 2017.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, 5701 
Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Ashlee Tipton, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Center for 
Complementary, and Integrative Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
Room 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-3849, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8dccfee5e1e8e8a3d9e4fdf9e2e3cde3e4e5a3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bdfcced5d1d8d893e9d4cdc9d2d3fdd3d4d593dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 24, 2017.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-23458 Filed 10-27-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report of Quick-Med Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").





In connection with the  Report, I, J. Ladd Greeno, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the date and for the periods indicated.











Dated:  May 16, 2011                                                                 /s/  J. Ladd Greeno_____________________________


J. Ladd Greeno


Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
FLRA NEWS

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY - WASHINGTON, DC 20424

Contact: Eric Prag FLRA.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 717-444-5859 September 26, 2023

The FLRA Finalizes Its Interim Final Rule That Allows Parties to Request Email Service of 

Documents Issued in Cases Before the Authority Members.

Today, the Federal Labor Relations Authority (the FLRA) issued a Federal Register notice

adopting, without change, an interim final rule published in the Federal Register on July 10, 

2023, with a correction published on July 12, 2023. The FLRA adopted the interim final rule,

without change, after it reviewed comments submitted in response to the interim final rule.

The final rule permits parties to proceedings before the FLRA’s three-Member, decisional 

component (the Authority) to voluntarily request – in individual cases filed through the FLRA’s 

electronic-filing system – that the Authority use electronic mail to serve the requesting parties

with any decisions, orders, and notices issued in those individual cases.

The amendment applies only to documents issued by the FLRA’s Office of Case Intake and 

Publication in cases pending before the FLRA’s Members. It does not apply to documents 

issued in cases pending before other FLRA offices or components, such as the Office of 

Administrative Law Judges or the Office of the General Counsel.

For more information on the Authority, click here.

###

The FLRA administers the labor-management relations program for 2.1 million non-Postal federal 

employees worldwide, approximately 1.2 million of whom are represented in 2,200 bargaining 

units. It is charged with providing leadership in establishing policies and guidance related to 

federal sector labor-management relations and with resolving disputes under, and ensuring 

compliance with, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
CASE NO. 

Fill out the information in the boxes in sections 1 and 2 below

Section 1 – Party

Section 2 - Representative Information

Name Telephone No.

Title Cell No.

Address

City State ZIP

Fax No.

E-mail

The person named above represents the party named in Section 1 in this case. Please serve this 

representative with all written communications, except for subpoenas. This designation remains 

effective until it is revoked or a new designation is filed.

Name (please print or type) Signature

Charged Party

and

Charging Party

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

DESIGNATION OF REPRESENTATIVE

FLRA Form 75

(Rev. 12/2013)
Exhibit
32.2











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Big Cat Energy
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Qfor the period end of January 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,
Richard G. Stifel, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated this 8th day of March,
2010.





/s/ Richard G. StifelRichard
      G. StifelChief
      Financial Officer
| 1.     | Such      Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                           |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year      ended December 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of HSM Holdings,      Inc. |

| Date:      March 31, 2008                        |
|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |
| HSM      Holdings, Inc.                          |
|                                             |
| By: /s/      Simone Crighton                |
| Simone      CrightonChief      Financial Officer |
Exhibit 31.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Thomas S. Rogers, certify that:


1) I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TiVo Inc.;


2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 18, 2012








/s/    THOMAS S. ROGERSThomas S. RogersPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
| Name of      Subsidiary                                        |         | Place of      Incorporation |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------|
|                                                           |         |                        |
| China      LianDi Clean Technology Engineering Ltd.            |         | BVI                         |
|                                                           |         |                        |
| Hua      Shen Trading (International) Ltd.                     |         | Hong      Kong              |
|                                                           |         |                        |
| Petrochemical      Engineering Ltd.                            |         | Hong      Kong              |
|                                                           |         |                        |
| Bright      Flow Control Ltd.                                  |         | Hong      Kong              |
|                                                           |         |                        |
| Beijing      JianXin Petrochemical Technology Development Ltd. |    | PRC                         |

----
Exhibit 12.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Líbano Miranda Barroso, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of TAM S.A.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the company and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thecompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: June 1, 2007   By: /s/ Líbano Miranda Barroso  Líbano Miranda Barroso  Chief Financial Officer
November 2023

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

2023 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey

Interpretation of Results

Organizational Response Rate

The Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM’s) Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) provides 

employees an opportunity to share their opinions about what matters most to them and to influence 

leadership. Employee feedback provides managers with insights into where improvements have been 

made and where they are needed. FLRA’s 2023 overall response rate was 54.5%.

Agency Strengths

The FLRA as a whole has 83 items identified as strengths (defined as 65% or greater positive

responses). The top five strengths:

• 98% positive – It is important to me that my work contribute to the common good.

• 97% positive – Employees in my work unit contribute positively to my agency’s performance.

• 97% positive – Employees in my work unit meet the needs of our customers.

• 97% positive – I am held accountable for the quality of work I produce.

• 97% positive – Employees in my work unit produce high quality work.

Positive Increases in 2023 (since 2022)

There were marked increases in job satisfaction and overall well-being reported as compared to 2022.

• 17% Increase – My organization’s senior leaders maintain high standards of honesty and 

integrity.

• 15% Increase – I believe the results of this survey will be used to make my agency a better place 

to work.

• 14% Increase – I have a high level of respect for my organization’s senior leaders. 

• 13% Increase – Employees are recognized for providing high quality products and services.

• 12% Increase – My work unit commits resources to develop new ideas (e.g., budget, 

staff, time, expert support). 

Areas for Improvement

Employees identified areas for improvement involving training, the mission of the agency, 

communication, innovation, management, and leadership. Questions with the highest percentage of 

negative scores:

• 25% – My workload is reasonable.

• 23% – Considering everything, how satisfied are you with your pay?

• 21% – My organization has prepared me for potential physical security threats.

• 18% – My job inspires me. 

• 14% – My work unit commits resources to develop new ideas (e.g. budget, staff, time, expert 

support). 

Chairman Grundmann remains committed to ensuring FLRA’s workplace is a diverse, open, 

friendly, and supportive place, emphasizing employee engagement at every level.
## On this page

        - About 
        - Strategies 
        - Budgets 
        - Plans 
        - Reports 

## About

----

To provide transparency, the FMC makes available documents critical to effective operations, including the Commission’s strategic plans, budgets, and performance and accountability reports. This information will give you an understanding of how the FMC is working towards its mission to ensure a competitive and reliable international ocean transportation supply system that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.

## Strategies

----

            - Strategic Plans
            - Unified Agenda and Regulatory Plan

## Budgets

----

            - Congressional Budgets

## Plans

----

            - FMC’s Shutdown Plan Due to Lapse in Appropriations  [PDF, 204 KB]

## Reports

----

            - Annual Reports
            - FAIR Act Reports
            - Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)
            - FMC Systems of Records (SORNs) Based on Privacy Act Issuances  [PDF, 359 KB]
            - Information Quality Guidelines Report
            - OIG Investigations
            - OIG Audit, Evaluations, and Reviews
            - OIG Semiannual Reports
            - Performance Accountability Reports
            - Plain Language Guidelines Report
            - Privacy Impact Assessments
            - Service Contract Inventory Analysis
            - Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act Considerations
            - Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan  [PDF, 158 KB]
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 25, 2013

Augusta Resource Corporation

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: Augusta Resource
Corporation

I, Conrad E. Huss, P.E.,
Ph.D., do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding
the technical report entitled NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Rosemont
Copper Project Updated Feasibility Study, Pima County, Arizona, dated August
28, 2012 for the Rosemont Project located in Pima County, Arizona in the Form
40-F Annual Report dated March 25, 2013, and any amendments thereto, and the
Annual Information Form of Augusta Resource Corporation (the Company) dated
March 25, 2013.

I also consent to the use of my
name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and
the Annual Information Form dated March 25, 2013 and to the incorporation by
reference of the Companys Annual Report on Form 40-F and any amendments
thereto, and the Annual Information Form dated March 25, 2013 in the Companys
Form S-8 Registration Statement (SEC File No. 333-173297).

| | By: | /s/
      Conrad E. Huss               
| | --- | ---------------------------------------
| |     | Conrad E. Huss, P.E., Ph.D.            
| |     | Principal Engineer                     
| |     | M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Wayne GOODE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6343.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 29, 2010.

Kenneth Wayne Goode, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appel-lee.

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Wayne Goode appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Goode,*No. 5:06-cr-00081-BO-l (E.D.N.C. filed Feb. 26, 2010 & entered Mar. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

March 5, 2007

Eric Engberg
7716 Summer Ave NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110


Penge Corp
3327 West Wadley, Suite 3-366
Midland, Texas 79707
432-683-8800



To Whom It May Concern:

I Eric Engberg agree to extend my promissory note with Penge Corp (dated
September 15, 2006) in the amount of $80,000 on a month to month basis. Either
party may call the note due with 30 days notice. The interest rate will be
raised to 28% annually for this extension.


Thanks,



PENGE CORPORATION

By: /s/ KC Holmes
    ------------------------------------

Name:    KC Holmes
Title:   President

Date: March 5, 2007


LENDER:

Signature: /s/ Eric Engberg
           -------------------------------------

Name: Eric Engberg


Address: 7716 Summer Ave NE
         Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110

Date: March 5, 2007