alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 29, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00870-CR 

No. 05-15-00871-CR 

No. 05-15-00872-CR 

ARTIS GRANVILLE, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. F96-43459-R, F96-19274-R, F97-45891-R 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Schenck 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

Artis Granville filed pro se notices of appeal on July 20, 2015 referencing convictions 

from 1996 and 1997. Appellant’s notices of appeal do not state any new appealable orders have 

been entered in these cases. The July 20, 2015 notices of appeal are untimely as to the 1996 and 

1997 sentencing dates. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1) (notice of appeal due within thirty days of 

date sentence imposed or suspended in open court). We dismiss the appeals for want of 

jurisdiction. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47 

150570F.U05 

 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ARTIS GRANVILLE, Appellant 

No. 05-15-00870-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F96-43459-R. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, 

Justices Lang and Schenck participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. 

Judgment entered July 29, 2015. 

 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ARTIS GRANVILLE, Appellant 

No. 05-15-00871-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F96-19274-R. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, 

Justices Lang and Schenck participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. 

Judgment entered July 29, 2015. 

 
 –4– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ARTIS GRANVILLE, Appellant 

No. 05-15-00872-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F97-45891-R. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, 

Justices Lang and Schenck participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. 

Judgment entered July 29, 2015.
exv10w37xby



 





Exhibit 10.37(b)
Execution
Version




FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE




     This first amendment to lease dated December 1, 1998 is executed by and between Sycal
Properties, Inc., a California corporation, hereinafter called “Landlord” and Century Theatres
Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereinafter called “Tenant”.



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into an Indenture of Lease on October 31, 1997,
hereinafter referred to as the “Lease”, for office space at 150 Pelican Way, San Rafael,
California, and



     WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend said Lease as hereinafter provided,



     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree that the Lease shall be amended as
follows:




	 	1.	 	The Leased Premises shall be increased by 2,281 square feet of office
space located on the second floor of the office building located at 150 Pelican Way,
San Rafael, California.
	 
	 	2.	 	Effective January 1, 1999 the Minimum Monthly Rent shall be as set forth in
the Amended Exhibit A





     This First Amendment to Lease is hereby executed and shall be effective as of the date first
written above. All other conditions of the Lease shall remain in effect.



	 	 	 
	Century Theatres, Inc.

	 	Sycal Properties, Inc.
	 
	 	 
	/s/ Joseph Syufy

	 	/s/ Alan Steuer
	 

	 	 
	Joseph Syufy, President

	 	Alan Steuer, Chief Financial Officer






 









 





AMENDED EXHIBIT A




RENT SCHEDULE CENTURY THEATRES, INC.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Minimum	 
	 	 	Monthly	 
	 	 	Rent	 
	January 1,
1999 - September 30, 1999
	 	$	47,074.50	 
	October 1, 1999 - September 30, 2000
	 	$	48,486.74	 
	October 1,
2000 - September 30, 2001
	 	$	49,941.34	 
	October 1,
2001 - September 30, 2002
	 	$	51,439.58	 
	October 1,
2002 - September 30, 2003
	 	$	52,982.76	 
	October 1, 2003 - September 30, 2004
	 	$	54,572.25	 
	October 1, 2004 - September 30, 2005
	 	$	56,209.41	 
	October 1, 2005 - September 30, 2006
	 	$	57,895.70	 
	October 1,
2006 - September 30, 2007
	 	$	59,632.57	 
	October 1,
2007 - September 30, 2008
	 	$	61,421.55
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice: 17-078]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# ACTION:

Notice of renewal of the charter of the NASA Advisory Council.

Pursuant to sections 14(b)(1) and 9(c) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App.), and after consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, the NASA Acting Administrator has determined that renewal of the charter of the NASA Advisory Council is necessary and in the public interest. The renewed charter is for a two-year period ending October 20, 2019.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Marla K. King, NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20546, phone: (202) 358-1148; email:                         *marla.k.king@nasa.gov.*

Patricia D. Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2017-23408 Filed 10-27-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
# /331 -» ELECTRONIC RECORD COA# 01-13-00488-CR 

## OFFENSE: 2 (Poss w/intent Deliver) Bryan Keith Burrell v. The State of 

## STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Harris COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 232nd District Court DATE: 08/21/2014 Publish: YES TC CASE #: 1320468



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Bryan Keith Burrell v. The Stateof STYLE: Texas CCA#: 

# 1331 'IH APPFLLfiNT^S FOR DISCRETIONARYREVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: '^I'l'^f Petition
JUDGE: 

# tfTL-. \M~- 

### CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

### PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC RECORD
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 353 

For the relief of Simeon Simeonov, Stela Simeonova, Stoyan Simeonov, and 

Vania Simeonova. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2009 

Mr. GUTIERREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Simeon Simeonov, Stela Simeonova, Stoyan 

Simeonov, and Vania Simeonova. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SIMEON 

4 SIMEONOV, STELA SIMEONOVA, STOYAN 

5 SIMEONOV, AND VANIA SIMEONOVA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act, Simeon Simeonov, Stela Simeonova, Stoyan 

9 Simeonov, and Vania Simeonova shall each be eligible for 

10 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 353 IH

1 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi2 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi3 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

4 of status to lawful permanent resident. 

5 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Simeon Simeonov, 

6 Stela Simeonova, Stoyan Simeonov, or Vania Simeonova 

7 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci8 fied in subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to have 

9 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi10 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

11 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

12 the enactment of this Act. 

13 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

14 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap15 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica16 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

17 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

18 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

19 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res20 idence to Simeon Simeonov, Stela Simeonova, Stoyan 

21 Simeonov, and Vania Simeonova, the Secretary of State 

22 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 4, during the 

23 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

24 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

25 country of the aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 353 IH

1 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

2 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

3 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section 

4 202(e) of such Act. 

5 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

6 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

7 parents, brothers, and sisters of Simeon Simeonov, Stela 

8 Simeonova, Stoyan Simeonov, and Vania Simeonova shall 

9 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

10 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

11 Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2667 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2667

   To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit providers of 
broadband internet access service from charging consumers above certain 
                     amounts for certain equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2021

 Mr. Van Drew introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit providers of 
broadband internet access service from charging consumers above certain 
                     amounts for certain equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Broadband Equipment Rental Reform 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CHARGING CONSUMERS ABOVE CERTAIN AMOUNTS FOR 
              CERTAIN RENTED EQUIPMENT.

    Section 642 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 562) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Prohibition on Charging Consumers Above Certain Amounts for 
Certain Equipment.--A provider of fixed broadband internet access 
service that enters into a contract with a consumer after the date of 
the enactment of this paragraph for the provision of such service may 
not charge the consumer for renting, leasing, or otherwise providing to 
the consumer equipment (such as a router or modem) employed on the 
premises of the consumer for the provision of such service, if the 
consumer has paid to the provider through monthly rental fees the price 
offered to the consumer by the provider (at the time the contract was 
entered into) for purchasing the equipment from the provider.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001088796
<NAME> BAROQUE CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5000000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Independence Energy Corp.
(the "Company") for the year ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Bruce
Thomson, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 2, 2011                   By: /s/ Bruce Thomson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Bruce Thomson
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; R01/F31/K01/K99 Conflicts.                    

*Date:*                         December 1, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Library of Medicine/Center for Scientific Review, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3042, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Zoe E. Huang, MD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, NIH, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 301-594-4937,                         *huangz@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 19, 2017.

Michelle Trout, 

Program Analyst, Office of the Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-23129 Filed 10-24-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Jesus CASTENEDA-RIVERA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-73379.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 25, 2010.*

Filed March 23, 2011.

Arnold S. Jaffe, Law Office of Arnold S. Jaffe, Santa Barbara, CA, for Petitioner.

Lance Lomond Jolley, Esquire, Trial, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER

The government’s petition for panel rehearing is granted.

The memorandum disposition filed on June 8, 2010, is withdrawn. A new memo*730randum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order.

Any petition for rehearing of the new memorandum disposition must be filed within 45 days.

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus Casteneda-Rivera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings to apply for adjustment of status. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Casteneda-Rivera’s motion as untimely where the motion was filed more than five months after the BIA’s final administrative order. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2); *see Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft,*383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004) (holding that BIA denials of motions to reopen are reviewed for abuse of discretion), *amended by*404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2005).

We lack jurisdiction to review Castene-da-Rivera’s equitable tolling contention because he failed to exhaust this claim before the agency. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

We agree with the determination in this court’s March 13, 2008, order that at the time that Casteneda-Rivera filed his motion to stay his voluntary departure period, his voluntary departure period had expired. Casteneda-Rivera’s motion to reopen did not stay his period of voluntary departure because the motion was untimely. *See Azarte v. Ashcroft,*394 F.3d 1278, 1280 (9th Cir.2005) (concluding that the BIA abuses its discretion “when it dismisses a motion to reopen, *timely*filed by an alien during his voluntary period, because the alien subsequently fails to depart prior to the end of the period while awaiting the BIA’s decision”) (emphasis added); *see also Barroso v. Gonzales,*429 F.3d 1195, 1205 (9th Cir.2005) (“the *timely*filing of a motion to reopen ... automatically tolls the voluntary departure period”) (emphasis added).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond Rios, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 467]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.), rendered November 27, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the third degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the court should have instructed the jury that the three robberies involved in this case were distinct and separate and that evidence of guilt as to one of the robberies could not be considered as evidence of guilt as to the other robberies. Since the defendant’s identity was a primary issue at trial and the three robberies, all sharing the same distinctive modus operandi, were properly joined (see, *People v Mack,*235 AD2d 548), any such charge would have been improper (see, *People v Lewis,*175 AD2d 885).

The defendant’s remaining contentions lack merit. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Joy and Lerner, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clements Golden Phoenix  Enterprises,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Joseph  Rizzuti,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Joseph Rizzuti
-----------------------------------
Joseph Rizzuti
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
April 28, 2003