alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration  statement
of  MidAmerican  Energy  Company on Form S-3 (File No.  333-15387) of our report
dated January 22, 1999, except with respect to Note (1)(a), as to which the date
is March  12,  1999,  on our  audits of  consolidated  financial  statements  of
MidAmerican  Energy  Company as of December  31, 1998 and 1997 and for the years
ended December 31, 1998,  1997 and 1996,  which report is included in this Form
10-K.





                                   /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                  --------------------------------
                                        PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP




Kansas City, Missouri
March 31, 1999
#### Fuller *vs.*Smith.

1. The court gave the law properly in charge; the jury decided the issues correctly, under the evidence; arid there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.

2. Where exception is taken to the admission of evidence, the ground of objection thereto must be stated.

Judgment affirmed.

March 17, 1885.

Jackson, Chief Justice.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-2F (the "Exchange Act
     periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
     fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
     material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
     as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Wells Fargo
     Bank, N.A. as Securities Administrator.

     Dated: June 30, 2008

     /s/ Michelle Gill
     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
|   | Exhibit 32.1 |
|--------|--------------|

| Date:           February 8, 2011 | By:    | /s/ MICHAEL J. MCCONNELL                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                    |   | Michael J. McConnell                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|                                                                                    |   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                                                                                    |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|                                                                                    |   | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Collectors Universe, Inc. and will be retained by Collectors Universe, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
Memo to Emeka Chukwu



 Exhibit 10.27 
 [Semtech Logo] 
  

	To :	Emeka Chukwu 


	From :	Mohan Maheswaran 


	Subject :	Relocation Expense extension 


	Date :	April 05, 2007 

 Dear Emeka, 
 Since your relocation of your family has been postponed due to the re-statement process and SEC filings that required your devoted time and effort, I am approving an
extention of your relocation package. 
  

	 	1.	Additional six (6) months temporary living accommodation until November 2007. 

  

	 	2.	Additional three (3) family trips for your spouse and children to southern California to find suitable living accommodations. 

  

	 	a.	The cost of these additional family trips ( flights, hotels and meals ) must not exceed $20,000 and be supported by the appropriate receipts. 

  

	 	3.	Please remember that Semtech’s policy is that employees agree to reimburse the Company for all relocation costs should the employee decide to leave the Company within
(2) two years on a voluntary basis. Your acceptance of this extention of relocation costs indicates that you agree to reimburse the Company for all relocation expenses on a monthly pro-rata basis for up to two (2) years from
date of hire. You will be responsible for all income taxes on any reimbursed items, including relocation and temporary living allowances that may not be deductible for income tax purposes. 

 Sincerely, 
 Mohan Maheswaran 
 President & CEO 
 Semtech Corporation 
 [Note: This compensation arrangement was approved by the Compensation Committee on April 5, 2007]
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home
 About
 Bureaus and Offices
 Office of Inspector General (OIG)
 On this page
About the OIG
Contact
Federal Resources



The Federal Maritime Commission’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) is an independent and objective oversight office created within the FMC by the Inspector General Act of 1978 (as amended) to:



Conduct and supervise audits, reviews, and investigations relating to FMC programs



Detect and prevent waste, fraud and abuse



Promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in the administration and management of FMC programs



Review existing and proposed legislation and regulations and make appropriate recommendations



Maintain effective working relationships with other Federal, State and local governmental agencies, and non-governmental entities, regarding the mandated duties of the Inspector General



Keep the FMC Chairman and Commissioners, and Congress fully informed of serious problems and deficiencies, and recommend, when appropriate, corrective actions and implementation measures



Report violations of law to the U.S. Attorney General



About the OIG


Audits and Other Reviews



Semiannual Reports



Investigations



OIG Brochure [PDF, 314 KB]



Whistleblower Protection [PDF, 624 KB]






Contact


**Jon Hatfield, Inspector General****Phone:** 202-523-5863**Hotline:** 202-523-5865



**Hotline Form**



**Email:** OIG@fmc.gov






Federal Resources


IGnet.gov



Oversight.gov Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
#### Carl TISTHAMMER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeffery S. WALTON, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-1196.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 9, 2013.*

Decided Dec. 10, 2013.

Carl Tisthammer, Marion, IL, pro se.

Before RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge, ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge and ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

*

 The appellee was not served with process in the district court and is not participating in this appeal. After examining the appellant’s brief and the record, we have concluded that the case is appropriate for summary disposition. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the appellant’s brief and the record. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER

Carl Tisthammer, an inmate at the federal penitentiary in Marion, Illinois, applied for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, contending that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs by denying him acid reflux and pain medication. He asserted that he had been prescribed and received those medications while imprisoned at other facilities, but officials at Marion can-celled his prescriptions and told him to buy over-the-counter medications instead.

The district court dismissed Tisthammer’s petition without prejudice because the federal habeas corpus statute may not be used to challenge conditions of confinement. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). The court declined to recast Tisthammer’s action as a civil rights complaint, explaining that a civil rights complaint would subject him to a higher filing fee and a possible “strike” if the court determined it to be frivolous. The court advised Tisthammer that he could re-file the suit as a civil rights action under *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).

On appeal Tisthammer glosses over the district court’s explanation and maintains that the denial of medical services he experienced amounts to deliberate indifference. But a habeas corpus petition is not the appropriate vehicle to challenge prison conditions or medical care. *See, e.g., Robinson v. Sherrod,*631 F.3d 839, 840-41 (7th Cir.2011); *Glaus v. Anderson,*408 F.3d 382, 386-88 (7th Cir.2005); *Alejo v. Heller,*328 F.3d 930, 937 (7th Cir.2003); *DeWalt v. Carter,*224 F.3d 607, 617 (7th Cir.2000); *Pischke v. Litscher,*178 F.3d 497, 499-500 (7th Cir.1999). Prisoners may use habeas corpus petitions to challenge the duration or fact of their confinement, *see Graham v. Broglin,*922 F.2d 379, 381 (7th Cir.1991), but because Tisthammer’s allegations center on medical care and do not remotely affect the duration or fact of his imprisonment, the district court properly dismissed his petition. *See Robinson,*631 F.3d at 840-41; *Glaus,*408 F.3d at 388. If he wishes to pursue his *782claim further, he should ensure he has exhausted the prison’s administrative procedures and file a civil rights complaint under *Bivens.*

His request for appointment of counsel is denied and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
NOTE                 Exhibit 10.19

$3,000                                                     Date: June 13, 2000


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  ArcusNet Corporation the undersigned ("Payor"), hereby
promises to pay to the order of Richard J. Margulies, an individual, ("Holder"),
the principal amount of $3,000.00 payable twenty four (24) months after the date
first set forth above. The principal amount hereof from time to time outstanding
shall bear  interest at the rate of six percent  (6%) per annum,  payable on the
date set forth  above.  All payments  hereunder  shall be in lawful money of the
United  States of America at the address of the Holder hereof or at such address
as shall be specified by the Holder to ArcusNet Corporation.

     If any default shall be made in the payment of interest or principal,  then
the Holder, by written notice to the Payor, may exercise all of its legal rights
to collect  the  balance due unless  within  five (5)  business  days after such
notice the default  shall be cured by Payor.  Such notice  shall be deemed given
three (3) days after having been  deposited in the United  States Mail  properly
addressed  and  sent by  registered  mail to the  particular  addressee,  return
receipt requested.

     Prepayments may be made in this note  voluntarily at any time and from time
to time, without penalty.



                                                 ArcusNet Corporation


                                                 BY:/s/Larry Weinstein
                                                 ---------------------
                                                       Larry Weinstein
                                                       President

                                        6
Order entered July 14, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01432
- CR AYOUAL AKOUT, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. F - 12
- 60792
- N



### O RDER
W e ABATED this appeal on July 1, 2015 to allow the trial court an opportunity to issue written findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellant’s custodial confession was made voluntarily

. Because the requested fi ndings have been rendered and a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings has been filed, we REINSTATE the appeal.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
Exhibit 23




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








The Board of Directors


Cascade Financial Corporation





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-32272, 333-97929, and 333-141329 and Form S-3 No. 333-156301) of  our report dated March 25, 2011, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Cascade Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive (loss) income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and in our same report, with respect to Cascade Financial Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which report is included in this annual report on Form 10-K of Cascade Financial Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ Moss Adams LLP




Everett, Washington


March 25, 2011
NOTE                 Exhibit 10.21

$6,000                                                     Date: June 16, 2000


     FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED,   Archer  Systems  Limited,   Inc.,  the  undersigned
("Payor"),  hereby  promises  to pay to the order of  Richard J.  Margulies,  an
individual,  ("Holder"), the principal amount of $6,000.00,  payable twenty four
(24) months after the date first set forth above.  The  principal  amount hereof
from time to time  outstanding  shall bear  interest  at the rate of six percent
(6%) per annum,  payable on the date set forth  above.  All  payments  hereunder
shall be in lawful  money of the United  States of America at the address of the
Holder  hereof or at such  address as shall be specified by the Holder to Archer
Systems Limited, Inc.

     If any default shall be made in the payment of interest or principal,  then
the Holder, by written notice to the Payor, may exercise all of its legal rights
to collect  the  balance due unless  within  five (5)  business  days after such
notice the default  shall be cured by Payor.  Such notice  shall be deemed given
three (3) days after having been  deposited in the United  States Mail  properly
addressed  and  sent by  registered  mail to the  particular  addressee,  return
receipt requested.

     Prepayments may be made in this note  voluntarily at any time and from time
to time, without penalty.



                                                 Archer Systems Limited, Inc.


                                                 BY:/s/Walter J. Krzanowski
                                                 --------------------------
                                                       Walter J. Krzanowski
                                                       Secretary/Treasurer

                                        8
Amendment to the Dynegy Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan


 Exhibit 10.38 
 AMENDMENT TO THE DYNEGY INC. 
 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Dynegy Inc., an Illinois corporation (“Dynegy Illinois”) has heretofore adopted the Dynegy Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, as
amended and restated, effective January 1, 2002 (the “Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, Dynegy Illinois has entered into that certain
Plan of Merger, Contribution and Sale Agreement by and among Dynegy Illinois, LSP GEN Investors, L.P., LS Power Partners, L.P., LS Power Equity Partners PIE I, L.P., LS Power Equity Partners, L.P., LS Power Associates, L.P., Falcon Merger Sub Co.,
and Dynegy Acquisition, Inc., executed September 14, 2006 (the “Merger Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the
transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement, Dynegy Illinois will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of a newly-formed Delaware corporation, named “Dynegy Inc.” (the “Company”), and Dynegy Illinois will thereafter be
renamed “Dynegy Illinois Inc.”, as of the Effective Time specified in the Merger Agreement (the “Effective Time”); 
 WHEREAS, in connection with the completion of such transactions, the Board of Directors of Dynegy Illinois and the Company have approved the adoption, assumption and sponsorship of the Plan by the Company; 
 WHEREAS, immediately after the Effective Time, Dynegy Illinois will withdraw as the sponsor of the Plan and the Company will assume sponsorship of
the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, it is desirable to clarify the definition of the Compensation Committee in the Plan to reflect the full
name of such committee; 
 NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective immediately after the Effective Time:

 1. Section 1.1(8) is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows: 
 “1.1(8) Company: Dynegy Inc., a Delaware corporation.” 
 2. Section 1.1(10) is amended in its entirety to provide as follows: 
 “(10) Compensation Committee: The Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company,
unless and until the Board of Directors designates another committee of the Board of Directors to serve in such capacity.” 








 3. Except as modified herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendment may be
executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 
 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 
  

 2 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amendment to the Plan to be executed on the date
indicated below, to be effective immediately after the Effective Time. 
  

			
	 DYNEGY ILLINOIS INC.
 (formerly
known as Dynegy Inc.),
an Illinois corporation

		
	By:	 	/s/ J. Kevin Blodgett
		
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, Administration
		
	Date:	 	April 2, 2007
	
	Approved and accepted:
	
	 DYNEGY INC.,
 a Delaware
corporation

		
	By:	 	/s/ J. Kevin Blodgett
		
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, Administration
		
	Date:	 	April 2, 2007


  

 3
#### Thomas HANTGES, Debtor-Appellant, v. Michael W. CARMEL, Chapter 11 Trustee, Trustee-Appellee.

No. 09-17247.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 18, 2011.

Jason Chandler Farrington, Timothy S. Cory, Timothy S. Cory & Associates, Las Vegas, NV, for Debtor-Appellant.

Michael Warren Carmel, Michael W. Carmel, Ltd., Phoenix, AZ, Robbin L. It-kin, Esquire, Katherine C. Piper, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Brian David Shapiro, Esquire, Law Office of Brian D. Shapiro, LLC, Las Vegas, NV, for Trustee-Appellee.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Thomas Hantges appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order requiring the turnover of bankruptcy estate property in his Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review for clear error whether an appellant is a “person aggrieved.” *Duckor Spradling & Metzger v. Baum Trust (In re P.R.T.C., Inc.),*177 F.3d 774, 777 (9th Cir.1999). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the appeal for lack of standing because, by his own admission, Hantges was not “directly and adversely affected pecuniarily” by the bankruptcy court’s order and hence did not qualify as a “person aggrieved.” *Id.*

Hantges’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00733

- CV

In re Gary Oatman

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

_______________________ ___________________

Melissa Go odwin , Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Filed: November 6, 2019
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification


The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Maui
General Store, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Maui General Store, Inc. and
will be retained by Maui General Store, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

February 22, 2006                       /s/ Richard H. Miller
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Richard H. Miller (Chief Executive
                                         Officer and Chief Financial Officer)