alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Howard Luckhardt et al., Respondents, v Jeffrey W. Waller, P. C., et al., Appellants.

[666 NYS2d 720]

—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated November 26, 1996, which denied their motion to compel the plaintiffs to submit to depositions.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the depositions shall be conducted at times and places to be set forth in written notices of not less than 10 days, to be given by the defendants to the plaintiffs, or at such times and places as the parties may agree.

The plaintiffs consulted with the defendants, an attorney and his professional corporation, regarding the plaintiffs’ rights of visitation with their son’s children. It is alleged that the defendants thereafter inadvertently revealed the nature of the legal consultation to the plaintiffs’ son, who severed all ties with the plaintiffs as a result. The plaintiffs subsequently commenced this legal malpractice action against the defendants to recover damages for emotional suffering, psychological injury (as well as the alleged physical manifestations thereof), and out-of-pocket expenses they incurred in attempting to reestablish visitation with their grandchildren. Following the defendants’ service of interrogatories and their receipt of the plaintiffs’ responses thereto, the defendants sought to conduct depositions of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs refused, contending that pursuant to CPLR 3130 (1), the defendants could not make use of depositions in this action without court permission because they had already made use of interrogatories. The defendants moved to compel the plaintiffs to submit to depositions, and the Supreme Court denied the motion. We reverse.

Insofar as it is relevant to this matter, CPLR 3130 (1) *492provides as follows: “In the case of an action to recover damages for personal injury * * * predicated solely on a cause or causes of action for negligence, a party shall not be permitted to serve interrogatories on and conduct a deposition of the same party * * * without leave of court”. We agree with the Supreme Court’s determination that this legal malpractice action sounds in negligence. However, the personal injury damages sought by the plaintiffs are not available under the circumstances presented, and the plaintiffs are limited to the recovery of pecuniary losses *(see, Dirito v Stanley,*203 AD2d 903; *Green v Liebowitz,*118 AD2d 756; *Sanders v Rosen,*159 Misc 2d 563). Therefore, the action cannot be one to recover damages for personal injury, and the limitation on the use of both interrogatories and depositions found in CPLR 3130 (1) is inapplicable to this case. Accordingly, the defendants’ motion to compel the plaintiffs to submit to depositions is granted. Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and Lemer, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, John E. Rea, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of RG America,  Inc.(the
"Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my  knowledge,  the  consolidated  financial  statements,  and other
financial  information  included in this report,  fairly present in all material
respects the consolidated  financial  condition,  results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  Registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  Registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
Registrant's  independent  registered  public  accounting  firm  and  the  audit
committee  of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  Registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


May 23, 2005


/s/ John E. Rea
---------------------------
John E. Rea
Principal Executive Officer


                                       24
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


           I, Ethan D. Hokit, Chief Financial Officer of Military Resale Group,
Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 of the Registrant, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

       (2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Registrant.



                                            By: /s/ Ethan D. Hokit
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Name: Ethan D. Hokit
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer

June 2, 2004


---------------------

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Military Resale Group,  Inc. and will be retained by Military Resale
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 21.1 List of Subsidiaries Subsidiaries
    
    State or Jurisdiction of IncorporationBusiness Objects Software Ltd.
    
    IrelandBusiness Objects (France) S.A.S.
    
    FranceBusiness Objects (UK) Ltd.
    
    United KingdomBusiness Objects Americas
    
    DelawareBusiness Objects Asia Pacific Pte Ltd.
    
    Singapore (India branch office)Business Objects Australia Pty Ltd.
    
    AustraliaBusiness Objects BeLux S.A./N.V.
    
    Belgium (Luxembourg branch office)Business Objects Corp.
    
    New Brunswick and United StatesBusiness
Objects Danmark ApS
    
    DenmarkBusiness Objects Data Integration, Inc.
    
    DelawareBusiness Objects de Brasil Ltda
    
    BrazilBusiness Objects de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoBusiness Objects Deutschland GmbH
    
    GermanyBusiness Objects Finland Ltd.
    
    FinlandBusiness Objects Greater China Ltd.
    
    Hong Kong (Beijing representative office)Business Objects Iberica S.L.
    
    SpainBusiness Objects Italia S.p.A.
    
    ItalyBusiness Objects Japan KK
    
    JapanBusiness Objects Korea Ltd.
    
    KoreaBusiness Objects Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
    
    MalaysiaBusiness Objects Nederland B.V.
    
    NetherlandsBusiness Objects Nordic A.B.
    
    SwedenBusiness Objects Option LLC
    
    DelawareBusiness Objects Schweiz A.G.
    
    SwitzerlandBusiness
Objects Software India Private Limited
    
    IndiaBusiness Objects Software (Shanghai) Co., Ltd
    
    ChinaBusiness Objects South Africa (Proprietary) Ltd.
    
    South AfricaBusiness
Objects Taiwan Inc.
    
    TaiwanCrystal Decisions (Hong Kong) Limited
    
    Hong Kong (Shanghai representative office)Crystal Decisions (UK) Ltd.
    
    United Kingdom and Delaware
NUMBER 13-23-00171-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

JAMES HOLT, Appellant,

 v.

ADRIANA DIAZ, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Tijerina, Silva, and Peña 

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva

On May 3, 2023, appellant filed a notice of appeal. On May 3, 2023, the Clerk of 

the Court notified appellant that his notice of appeal was not in compliance with the Texas 

Rule of Appellant Procedure 9.1(b), 9.5, and 25.1(d)(1), (2), (3), (4). 
2

On June 13, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant the appeal was subject 

to dismissal if an amended, compliant notice of appeal was not filed within ten days from 

the date of the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

Appellant has not cured the defective notice of appeal, nor otherwise responded 

to the notices from the clerk requiring a response or other action within the time specified; 

accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b), (c).

CLARISSA SILVA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the 

20th day of July, 2023.
Consent of Guido MAntega, the minister of Finance



 Exhibit 4(8) 
 FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL 
 MINISTRY OF FINANCE 
 CONSENT 
 I, Guido Mantega, Minister of
Finance of the Federative Republic of Brazil, hereby consent to the reference to my name, in my official capacity as Minister of Finance, under the caption “Official Statements” in the Prospectus of the Federative Republic of Brazil
included in the Registration Statement filed by the Federative Republic of Brazil with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 
  

	
	/s/ Guido Mantega
	 
	Guido Mantega
	Minister of Finance
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49025-49026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22960]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[Notice-CX-2017-01; Docket No. 2017-0002; Sequence 18]


Office of Human Resources Management; SES Performance Review 
Board

AGENCY: Office of Human Resources Management (OHRM), General Services 
Administration (GSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of new members to 
the General Services Administration Senior Executive Service 
Performance Review Board. The Performance Review Board assures 
consistency, stability, and objectivity in the performance appraisal 
process.

DATES: Applicable: October 23, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Shonna James, Director, Executive 
Resources Division, Office of Human Resources Management, General 
Services Administration, 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405, 202-
230-7005.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c)(1) through (5) of title 5 
U.S.C requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulation 
prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES 
performance review board(s).
    The board is responsible for making recommendations to the 
appointing and

[[Page 49026]]

awarding authority on the performance appraisal ratings and performance 
awards for the Senior Executive Service employees.
    The following have been designated as members of the Performance 
Review Board of GSA:
    <bullet> Anthony Costa, Acting Deputy Administrator, Office of the 
Administrator--Chair.
    <bullet> Antonia Harris, Chief Human Capital Officer, Office of 
Human Resources Management.
    <bullet> Allison Brigati, Associate Administrator for Government-
wide Policy, Office of Government-Wide Policy.
    <bullet> Alan Thomas Jr., Commissioner, Federal Acquisition 
Service.
    <bullet> Mary Davie, Deputy Commissioner, Federal Acquisition 
Service.
    <bullet> Daniel Mathews, Commissioner, Public Buildings Service.
    <bullet> Michael Gelber, Deputy Commissioner, Public Buildings 
Service.
    <bullet> Giancarlo Brizzi, Principal Deputy Associate Administrator 
for Government-wide Policy, Office of Government-Wide Policy.
    <bullet> Joanna Rosato, Regional Commissioner, Public Buildings 
Service, Mid-Atlantic Region.
    <bullet> Kim Brown, Regional Commissioner, Federal Acquisition 
Service, Great Lakes Region.

    Dated: October 17, 2017.
Timothy O. Horne,
Acting Administrator, General Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017-22960 Filed 10-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6820-FM-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                         135,267
<SECURITIES>                                   165,798
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                       703
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               322,579
<PP&E>                                          17,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 424,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,978
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                     409,489
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   424,909
<SALES>                                         26,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,014
<CGS>                                            1,522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,181
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,011)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,011)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,011)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Section 906 Certification
                                     by the
               Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

         Each of Gary Valinoti, Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas J.
Mazzarisi, Chief Financial Officer, of JAG Media Holdings, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
January 31, 2004 ("Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ Gary Valinoti                           /s/ Thomas J. Mazzarisi
-----------------                           -----------------------
Name: Gary Valinoti                         Name: Thomas J. Mazzarisi

Date: March 22, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven Smith, Appellant.

[988 NYS2d 186]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel E FitzGerald, J.), entered on or all out April 27, 2012, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.46 motion for resentencing, unanimously affirmed. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about July 16, 2010, unanimously dismissed as academic.

The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated the denial of defendant’s motion for resentencing. Resentencing is discretionary *(People v Sosa,*18 NY3d 436, 442-443 [2012]), and courts may deny the applications of persons who “have shown by their conduct that they do not deserve relief from their sentences” *(People v Paulin,*17 NY3d 238, 244 [2011]). Accordingly, the court properly considered defendant’s entire background, and not merely the circumstances of the underlying drug conviction. Before that conviction, defendant already had five felony convictions, which included crimes of violence. Defendant’s prison disciplinary record was extremely poor. Furthermore, he committed numerous crimes while on parole, and even while his resentencing motion was pending *(see e.g. People v Neely,*99 AD3d 578 [1st Dept 2012], *lv denied*20 NY3d 1013 [2013]). Thus, defendant has “demonstrated a complete inability to control his behavior” *(People v Arce,*83 AD3d 590, 591 [1st Dept 2011]).

Concur— Mazzarelli, J.E, Acosta, Freedman, Richter and Clark, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Charles M. Sprock, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc. (the Company). This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and                                                             
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



|Date: | August 6, 2007 |  | /s/ Charles M. Sprock                
|----- | -------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|      |                |  | Charles M. Sprock                    
|      |                |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
LaBranche & Co Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George M.L. LaBranche, IV,
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.

|                       |  |  |  |        |  |                                                
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2009 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ George M.L. LaBranche, IV                  
|                       |  |  |  | Name:  |  | George M.L. LaBranche, IV                      
|                       |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be
retained by LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.