alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3157 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3157

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
 Alexandria, Minnesota, as the ``Max J. Beilke Department of Veterans 
                      Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 
              ALEXANDRIA, MINNESOTA.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Alexandria, 
Minnesota, expected to open in September 2009, shall after the date of 
the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the ``Max J. 
Beilke Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''. Any 
reference to such outpatient clinic in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be 
considered to be a reference to the Max J. Beilke Department of 
Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 3, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3157

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
 Alexandria, Minnesota, as the ``Max J. Beilke Department of Veterans 
                      Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.
```
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACCOMPANYING QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB OF
VIVA INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2003, I,
ROBERT SCOTT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF ALTUS
AEROSPACE INTERNATIONAL, INC. HEREBY CERTIFY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, TO THE
BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
          2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended June 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Viva International, Inc.

Dated:  August 19, 2003

VIVA INTERNATIONAL, INC.


By: /s/ Robert Scott
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
OrgNo Organization Name Reason for Action License No. Termination Date Comment

025422 AETNA LOGISTICS GROUP, INC. Failure to maintain bonds 025422NF 12/23/2020

010652 AUTO SHIPPING INTERNATIONAL, INC. Failure to maintain a bond 010652N 1/21/2021

026413 BRENDAN KYUNG dba JD TRANSPORT Failure to maintain a bond 026413N 1/22/2021

028028 CROSSROAD LOGISTICS & SHIPPING LLC Failure to maintain bonds 028028NF 12/31/2020

007440 FIDELITY TRANSPORT, INC. Failure to maintain a bond 003209F 12/30/2020 NVOCC 003209N remains active

013650 FOREX CARGO, INC. Voluntary Surrender 013650N 1/6/2021

016847 GLOBAL TRANSPORT SPECIALISTS, INC. Failure to maintain a bond 016847F 1/14/2021

010830 INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT SERVICES, INC. Voluntary Surrender 003505F 12/31/2020

008650 INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT SERVICES, INC. OF ILLINOIS Voluntary Surrender 008650N 12/31/2020

018342 LOUISIANA FORWARDER LLC Voluntary Surrender 018342F 12/30/2020

027258 MN CONTAINER LINES INC Voluntary Surrender 027258NF 12/28/2020

025536 ROADWAY MOVING AND STORAGE, INC. Voluntary Surrender 025536N 1/14/2021

027563 SHIPEX LOGISTICS LLC Voluntary Surrender 027563NF 1/19/2021

022568 ST. JOHN LOGISTICS INC. Failure to maintain a bond 022568F 1/6/2021

020862 STELLAR SHIPPING INC. Voluntary Surrender 020862N 12/31/2020

011186 THOMAS M. ALDERSON dba EMERALD MARITIME SERVICES Voluntary Surrender 003605F 1/12/2021

025350 UNIVERSAL SHIPPING CONSULTANTS, LLC Voluntary Surrender 025350NF 12/31/2020

004349 W.R. ZANES & CO., OF LA., INC. Voluntary Surrender 000752F 1/12/2021

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations & Surrenders

December 26, 2020  to  January 25,  2021
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Super Luck, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Yan Tsang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Yan TsangYan Tsang, Chief Executive Officer February 27, 2009
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Luis Fernando AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-51088

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 9, 2008.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Philip J. Lynch, Henry Joseph Bempo-rad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendanb-Appellant.

*522Before KING, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Luis Fernando Aguirre appeals his 96-month sentence following his guilty plea conviction for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Aguirre argues that his sentence, which is within a properly-calculated advisory guideline range, is unreasonable because the district court erred in applying a three-level enhancement required by U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(E). Aguirre asserts that the application of § 2B3.1(b)(2)(E) overstates the seriousness of the offense and represents an “unsound judgment” that results in an “unwarrantedly harsh sentence for the unarmed offender.”

After entering the bank and approaching the teller window, Aguirre handed the teller a note stating that he had a gun. During the course of the bank robbery, Aguirre kept one hand under his shirt and gestured to the teller as if he had a gun. He verbally told the teller that he had a gun and would use it. In response to these threats, the teller removed cash from her drawer and gave it to Aguirre.

There is no evidence that the district court committed a significant procedural error at sentencing. *See Gall v. United States,*U.S., 128 S.Ct. 586, 597, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). Moreover, where the district court imposes a sentence within a properly calculated guideline range, the sentence is entitled to a rebuttable presumption of reasonableness. *See United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006); *see also Rita v. United States,*— U.S., 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007). Aguirre has failed to demonstrate that his sentence is unreasonable. *See Gall,*128 S.Ct. at 597, 128 S.Ct. 586; *see also United States v. Souther,*221 F.3d 626, 629 (4th Cir.2000) (“We agree with the Third and Eleventh Circuits that a concealed hand may serve as an object that appears to be a dangerous weapon.”). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
exv10w18



 





Exhibit 10.18




March 20, 2007




Mitch and Hank Thompson

323 Ist St SW

Mahnomen, MN 56557




Dear Mitch and Hank:



Enclosed is a $20,000 check from Agassiz Energy to extend the option to purchase your homestead for
another year. The company appreciates the opportunity to extend the option and continue planning
for construction of an ethanol plant.



Agassiz has identified a building, KL Process Design Group from Rapid City, SD. We are working on a
revision to the Security Exchange Commission and upon their approval will conduct an equity drive.
The Environment Assessment Worksheet is being revised with equipment specifications from the new
builder. We hope to complete the EAW within a couple months. If all goes well we could begin
construction this fall.



If any questions, don’t hesitate to call or drop a note.




	 	 	 
	Sincerely,
	 	 
	/s/ Donald Sargeant
 


	 	 
	Donald Sargeant 

Chief Manager
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesus CONTRERAS-CANO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-50155

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 19, 2013.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jesus Contreras-Cano pleaded guilty, without a plea agreement, to importation and possession with intent to distribute more than 50 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 952, and he was sentenced to 30 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Contreras-Cano argues that the district court should have granted him the minor participant adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) because he was less culpable than the other participants in the offense. He contends that he was a mere courier hired to drive a truck that others loaded to a place others told him to go.

Contreras-Cano pleaded guilty to importation and possession with intent to distribute more than 50 kilograms of marijuana. Although his role may have been less culpable than others in the broader conspiracy, his role in actually bringing the marijuana across the border was integral to his offenses. As the district court noted, Contreras-Cano was paid to carry loads of marijuana across the border six times, and was paid even more to transport the marijuana deep into the interior of the United States. The district court *541did not clearly err in finding that Contreras-Cano was not entitled to a minor participant adjustment. *See United States v. Silva-De Hoyos,*702 F.3d 843, 847 (5th Cir.2012).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Ocean Transportation Intermediary 

Foreign NVOCC Registration Terminations/Suspensions

February 28, 2020

Joylink International Transportation Co., Ltd.

Org No.: 023120

Address: Room 4001, Hometex Mansion

No. 210 Siping Road

Shanghai 200086

China

Termination: February 7, 2020

Reason: Voluntary surrender

Shanghai Green Channel Logistics Co., Ltd.

Org No.: 026013

Address: Unit A, 9/F, Gold Beach Building

No. 908 East Da Ming Road

Shanghai 200080

China

Surrendered: March 01, 2020

Reason: Voluntary surrender

Streamlines Logistics N.V.

Org No.: 027331

Address: Presidente Romulo Betancourt Boulevard 2

Willemstad

Curacao

Termination: February 20, 2020

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Sweg Service (H.K.) Limited

Org No.: 027688

Address: Room A1, 1/F., Cheong Tai Ind. Bldg.

No 50-56 Fui You Kok Street, N.T.

Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong

Termination: February 1, 2020

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2595

_____________________________

RONALD PIKE,

Appellant,

v.

SELECT STAFFING and CORVEL 

ENTERPRISE CORP.,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Ralph J. Humphries, Judge

Date of Accident: January 8, 2016.

September 28, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Laurie Thrower Miles of Miles and Parrish, P.A., Lakeland, and 

Wendy S. Loquasto of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, for 

Appellant.

Juliana L. Curtis and Barbi L. Feldman of Vecchio, Carrier, 

Feldman & Johannessen, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellees.
COMPROMISE AGREEMENT

FMC File No. 17175

This Agreement is entered into between:

(1) The Federal Maritime Commission, hereinafter referred to as Commission, and

(2) Baron Worldwide, LLC, hereafter referred to as Respondent. 

WHEREAS, the Commission is considering the initiation of an assessment proceeding 

against Respondent for the recovery of civil penalties for alleged violation of 46 C.F.R. 515.18(c).

WHEREAS, such a proceeding would be based on the Commission’s allegation that 

Respondent engaged in certain practices, to wit: 

Respondent operated without a Qualifying Individual as required 

under 46 C.F.R. 515, for a period in excess of one year. 

WHEREAS, the Commission is authorized under section 13(c) of the 1984 Act, 46 U.S.C. 

§ 41109(c), and Subpart W of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 46 C.F.R. § 

502.604, et seq. to compromise and collect civil penalties arising for the alleged violation set forth 

and described above; and

WHEREAS, Respondent has terminated the practice which was the basis of the alleged 

violation set forth herein, and has committed to maintaining measures designed to eliminate such

practice in the future; and
2

WHEREAS, Respondent has cooperated and disclosed to the Commission information, 

facts, and documents relevant to its transportation activities and practices; and

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises herein, and in compromise of all 

civil penalties arising from the alleged violation set forth and described herein, Respondent and 

the Commission hereby agree upon the following terms of settlement:

1. Respondent shall make payment to the Commission by cashier’s check in the total 

amount of $21,000.

2. This instrument shall forever bar the commencement or institution of any 

assessment proceeding or other claim for recovery of civil penalties from 

Respondent, its officers, directors, employees, or agents arising from the alleged 

violation set forth above that occurred for a period in excess of one year prior to 

February 6, 2016.

3. It is expressly understood that this Agreement is not, and is not to be construed as, 

an admission by Respondent to the alleged violation set forth above.
3

4. This agreement is subject to approval by the Commission’s Managing Director in 

accordance with 46 C.F.R. § 502.604.

Baron Worldwide, LLC

Signature: __________________________

Printed Name: ______________________

Title: ______________________________

Date: ______________________________

APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE

The above Terms and Conditions and Amount of Consideration are hereby approved and 

accepted:

By the Federal Maritime Commission:

____________________________________

Peter J. King, Director (Date)

Bureau of Enforcement

____________________________________

Vern W. Hill (Date)

Managing Director
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3427 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to protect States 

that have in effect laws or orders with respect to pay 

to play reform, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3427 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Ethics Law Pro3 tection Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PAY TO PLAY REFORM. 

5 Section 112 of title 23, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(h) PAY TO PLAY REFORM.—A State transpor8 tation department shall not be considered to have violated 

9 a requirement of this section solely because the State in 

10 which that State transportation department is located, or 

11 a local government within that State, has in effect a law 

12 or an order that limits the amount of money an individual 

13 or entity that is doing business with a State or local agen14 cy with respect to a Federal-aid highway project may con15 tribute to a political party, campaign, or elected official.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
---

CONSENT  OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the use of our reports dated  March 25, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Augusta  Resource Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial  reporting of Augusta Resource Corporation in this Annual Report on Form 40-F  for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the U.S. Securities and  Exchange Commission and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual Report  on Form 40-F, together with our audit report contained herein, in the Company’s  Form S-8 Registration Statement (SEC File No. 333-163161).

/s/ Ernst  & Young LLP

Chartered Accountants
  Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
March 25, 2010

---
STRATS Trust For Procter & Gamble Securities, Series 2006-1 - 10-K

**Exhibit31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I,Barbara Garafalo, certify that:

 

1.          Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by thisreport on Form 10-K of STRATS Trust For Procter & Gamble Securities, Series 2006-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.          Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.          Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.          Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in allmaterial respects; and

 

5.          Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordancewith Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, exceptas otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed inthis report on Form 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: TheBank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.
#### Reginald B. DeJOHNETTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles LEE, Carl Millner, Randy Sid, Sheri Ketnor, Sue Norton, Frances Maxwell, Andera Guyot, and Andrea Mobley, Defendants-Appellees. Reginald B. DeJohnette, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Susan Hubbard, Mike Evans, N. Gran-nis, A. Hedgpeth, G. Neotti, B. Rankin, G.R. Salazar, J.A. Agamao, Eloy Medina, T. Variz, M. Lopez, K.J. Allen, and J. Burleson, Defendants-Ap-pellees.

Nos. 2011-1079, 2011-1097.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 13, 2011.

Reginald B. DeJohnette, Soledad, CA, pro se.

Erin B. Sullivan, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER

The appellant having not filed a brief in these matters,

It Is Ordered That:

The appeals are dismissed.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-662V

Filed: January 26, 2015

Not for Publication

*************************************

GRETCHEN BRADY EBRIGHT, *

*

 Petitioner, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on

 * stipulation of fact

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

James R. Moyles, Lemoyne, PA, for petitioner.

Ann D. Martin, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On January 26, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an 

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. 

In accordance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts that she did not 

incur any costs in pursuit of her petition. Petitioner submitted a draft application for attorneys’ 

fees and costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain 

items in petitioner’s application. Based on these objections, petitioner amends her application for 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

redact such material from public access.
2

attorneys’ fees and costs to $21,938.17. Respondent does not object to this amount. The 

undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $21,938.17, 

representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a 

check payable jointly to petitioner and Moyles Law Firm in the amount of $21,938.17.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2015 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

 

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.