alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code 'SS' 1350

     The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of General Chemical Industrial Products Inc.
(the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                      /s/ David S. Graziosi
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      David S. Graziosi
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to General Chemical Industrial Products Inc. and will be retained
by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3425 

To authorize the Fair Housing Commemorative Foundation to establish a 

commemorative work on Federal land in the District of Columbia to 

commemorate the enactment of the Fair Housing Act in 1968. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2009 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Fair Housing Commemorative Foundation 

to establish a commemorative work on Federal land in 

the District of Columbia to commemorate the enactment 

of the Fair Housing Act in 1968. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMMEMORATIVE WORK RECOGNIZING EN4 ACTMENT OF FAIR HOUSING ACT. 

5 (a) AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH COMMEMORATIVE

6 WORK.—The Fair Housing Commemorative Foundation 

7 may establish a commemorative work on Federal land in 

8 the District of Columbia and its environs to commemorate 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3425 IH

1 the enactment of the Fair Housing Act (title VIII of Pub2 lic Law 90–284) on April 11, 1968. 

3 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO4 RATIVE WORKS.—The commemorative work authorized by 

5 subsection (a) shall be established in accordance with 

6 chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code (commonly 

7 known as the ‘‘Commemorative Works Act’’). 

8 (c) USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS PROHIBITED.—Federal 

9 funds may not be used to pay any expense of the establish10 ment of the commemorative work authorized by subsection 

11 (a). The Fair Housing Commemorative Foundation shall 

12 be solely responsible for acceptance of contributions for, 

13 and payment of the expenses of, the establishment of the 

14 commemorative work. 

15 (d) DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.—If, upon payment 

16 of all expenses of the establishment of the commemorative 

17 work authorized by subsection (a) (including the mainte18 nance and preservation amount provided for in section 

19 8906(b), of title 40, United States Code), or upon expira20 tion of the authority for the commemorative work under 

21 chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, there remains 

22 a balance of funds received for the establishment of that 

23 commemorative work, the Fair Housing Commemorative 

24 Foundation shall transmit the amount of the balance to 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3425 IH

1 the Secretary of the Treasury for deposit in the account 

2 provided for in section 8906(b)(1) of such title. 

3 (e) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this section, 

4 the terms ‘‘commemorative work’’ and ‘‘the District of Co5 lumbia and its environs’’ have the meanings given to such 

6 terms in section 8902(a) of title 40, United States Code. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### K. S. et al., Appellants, v Incorporated Village of Garden City et al., Respondents.

[666 NYS2d 8]

—In an action to recover damages, *inter alia,*for assault and sexual abuse, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated November 18, 1996, which denied *266their motion to discover the handwritten notes of the expert of the defendant Incorporated Village of Garden City.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which denied that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to compel the expert of the defendant Incorporated Village of Garden City to turn over the handwritten recorded statements of the infant plaintiffs and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs are entitled to copies of those portions of the handwritten notes of the examining psychiatrist of the Incorporated Village of Garden City which contain the statements of the infant plaintiffs made to the examining psychiatrist and recorded by him for the purposes of this litigation (see, CPLR 3101 [e]; *DiMichel v South Buffalo Ry. Co.,*80 NY2d 184, 194, *cert denied sub nom. Poole v Consolidated Rail Corp.,*510 US 816; *Sands v News Am. Publ.,*161 AD2d 30, 40; *Sullivan v New York City Tr. Auth.,*109 AD2d 879, 880). The Village is not otherwise required to provide the plaintiffs with the psychiatrist’s notes upon which his detailed written report is based *(see, Pernice v Devora,*238 AD2d 558; *King Elecs. v American Natl. Fire Ins. Co.,*232 AD2d 273; *Weinberger v Lensclean Inc.,*198 AD2d 58). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.2(b)


      Schedule of Warrant (new financings after October 31, 2005) Issued by
               NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on April 4, 2007


                     Expiration                                      Shares
    Grant Date          Date             Exercise Price              Granted
    ----------          ----             --------------              -------
     04/04/07         04/04/12        Greater of: (i)$0.002;        5,200,000
                                      or (ii) the par value of
                                      NCT Group, Inc.
                                      common stock on the
                                      date of exercise
# **Exhibit 32.1**

# ** **

# **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LaBranche& Co Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, George M.L. LaBranche, IV, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Presidentof the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of myknowledge, that:

 

1.             the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, andfor, the period covered by the Report.

 
| Date: May 10, 2005 |  /s/ George M. L. LaBranche, IV |                              |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|               | Name:                                | George M.L. LaBranche, IV         |
|               | Title:                               | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer |
|               | and President                        |
|                    |                                      |                                   |  |

 

 

# **Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report oras a separate disclosure document.**A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and willbe retained by LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 10.6(c)

AMENDMENT TO THE

FINLAY ENTERPRISES, INC.

EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION AND STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

WHEREAS, Finlay Enterprises, Inc. (the “Corporation”) maintains the Finlay Enterprises, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”); and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Article 12 of the Plan, the Corporation may amend the Plan at any time; and

WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to provide for cash awards instead of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) in the event stockholder approval of the extension of the Finlay Enterprises, Inc. 1997 Long Term Incentive Plan is not obtained.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective February 27, 2007, as follows:

Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, all Participant RSUs and Matching RSUs awarded to Participants on April 25, 2007 shall be automatically forfeited and immediately replaced with the cash equivalent, in the event the Corporation’s stockholders do not extend the term of the Finlay Enterprises, Inc. 1997 Long Term Incentive Plan or adopt a successor plan. Accordingly, each RSU shall be replaced with a cash amount equal to the value of the RSU on the date of forfeiture and the cash amounts shall be credited to the Accounts held under the Plan on behalf of the Participants on a book entry basis. Interest on the cash amounts shall be credited to the Accounts on the first business day of each fiscal quarter beginning August 6, 2007 (the “Crediting Date”) based upon the account balances on each Crediting Date through the end of the Deferral Period. Interest
credited on each Crediting Date shall be calculated using the Fidelity Managed Income Portfolio II interest rate on the applicable Crediting Date. The cash amounts (including interest) shall be subject to all terms of the Plan (including vesting) not inconsistent with this paragraph.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed this 27th day of February, 2007.

 

 


	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        FINLAY ENTERPRISES, INC.
 
	
                          
 	
                         
 	
                        By 
 	
                        
 /s/  Arthur E. Reiner
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        Arthur E. Reiner
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of RAM Holdings Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Vernon M. Endo, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/S/ Vernon M. Endo |                                      
|------------------ | -------------------------------------
|                   |                                      
|                  
|Name:              | Vernon M. Endo                       
|Title:             | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:              | March 9, 2007                        

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2000 and the unaudited
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three
month period ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                2951
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         1751
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (1348)
<INVENTORY>                                            312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    21,653
<PP&E>                                                2543
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (424)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       26231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               259721
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                              8096
<OTHER-SE>                                        (241586)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      (233490)
<SALES>                                               5261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      5261
<CGS>                                                 4341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         4341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    237282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (236137)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (236137)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (236137)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.03)



</TABLE>
INTHE COURTOFAPPEALS FOR THE STATE OFWASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. STEPHEN EDWARD HUTSELL, Appellant. No. 74157-8-1 DIVISION ONE 

### UNPUBLISHED OPINION ^ FILED: January 17, 2017 

### Leach, J. —Stephen Hutsell challenges the trial court's imposition ofthe 

### mandatory $100 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing fee required by RCW43.43.7541. He claims the fee, as applied to a repeat felony offender, violates equal protection. Our recent opinion in State v. Lewis1 considered and rejected the same argument. We affirm. FACTS 

### On May 22, 2015, theStatecharged Hutsell withpossession of a controlled substance (heroin). He pleaded guilty as charged. Because the State had 

### Hutsell's DNAonfile as a result of a prior conviction, the trial court did not require Hutsell to undergo a DNA test. It did, however, impose a $100 DNA testing fee. At sentencing, Hutsell challenged the imposition of the DNA testing fee. Concluding that a statute required the fee, the court rejected Hutsell's challenge. Hutsell appeals. 

### 1 194 Wn. App. 709, 379 P.3d 129 (2016), review denied. No. 93420-7 (Wash. Dec. 7, 2016).No. 74157-8-1/2

ANALYSIS 

### Hutsell claims that the mandatory DNA collection fee required by RCW43.43.7541, as applied to a repeatfelony offender, violates equal protection. But inLewis,this court considered and rejected the samechallenge. We held that a rational basis exists to impose a fee for everyfelony sentence because the fee funds both the cost ofcollection and the costs to operate and maintain the state 

### DNAdatabase.2 Following Lewis, we affirmthe trialcourt's imposition of the DNA testing fee. Hutsell asks the court to waive his appellate costs. RAP 14.2 permits an appellate court to bar an award of costs in a decision terminating review. Here, the State states that itdoes not intend to request appellate costs. This makes Hutsell's request moot, and we do not consider it. CONCLUSION We affirm.

WE CONCUR:

^ H-VV ) 

# Jt.Alr<$Jk«,

2 Lewis, 194 Wn. App. at 719-20 (citing State v. Johnson. 194 Wn. App. 304, 307-08, 374 P.3d 1206 (2016)).
-2-
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home > Engagements > Chairman Maffei Speaking at IANA Intermodal Expo 2024

Chairman Maffei Speaking at IANA Intermodal Expo 2024


Posted on:


July 13, 2024 September 11, 2024 | Long Beach, CA



Federal Maritime Commission Chairman Daniel B. Maffei will deliver a morning address to the audience attending the Intermodal Association of North America (IANA) Intermodal Expo 2024.  Information about registration and costs to attend are available online.



IANA Intermodal EXPO Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
Exhibit 32
                                                                     ----------


                   CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of Cascade Financial Corporation (the "Registrant").  This
Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.  This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the annual period ended December 31, 2004.

   We certify that such Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
Registrant.

Date: March 11, 2005


                                                    /s/ Carol K. Nelson
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    Carol K. Nelson, President
                                                    and Chief Executive Officer


                                                    /s/ Lars H. Johnson
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    Lars H. Johnson,
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,917
<SECURITIES>                                    16,643
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,365)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,382
<PP&E>                                           6,946
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,976)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,961
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,029
<SALES>                                          8,435
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,435
<CGS>                                            2,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (348)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,625)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>
#### Henry Mendler, Respondent-Appellant, v Judith M. Mendler, Appellant-Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 601]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered on November 4, 1996, which, *inter alia,*granted petitioner husband’s application to discharge a second mortgage he had given to respondent wife, and denied petitioner’s motion for counsel fees, and bringing up for review a prior order, entered on or about November 18, 1994, which denied respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

While the parties’ separation agreement was silent as to whether petitioner could prepay the mortgage, the mortgage agreement contained a clause permitting prepayment, thus rebutting the presumption that prepayment was not permitted *(see, Matter of Arthur v Burkich,*131 AD2d 105, 106). Furthermore, reading the separation agreement and the mortgage together as parts of a single transaction, we find that the parties intended that the mortgage was to secure only the outstanding principal and interest thereon, and that the other debts were to remain unsecured. Accordingly, petitioner was entitled to a satisfaction of the mortgage upon his tender of the principal and the interest due through the date of tender *(see, Three Bros. Estates v Guli,*205 AD2d 525; *compare, Matter of Jeffrey Towers v Straus,*31 AD2d 319, *affd*26 NY2d 812). We have considered the parties’ remaining contentions for affirmative relief and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.