alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Gamestate Entertainment, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Cameron King, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 Dated this August 17, 2004   /s/ Cameron King
 Cameron King, CFO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1911

LENIR RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

O. J. FAULK, Officer, badge #2908; D. N. CUSTER, Officer, 

badge #3756; OFFICER RIZZA; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY; MARIO 

TORRES, Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District 

Judge. (1:15-cv-01489-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: December 9, 2016 Decided: January 9, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lenir Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Pace Baucom, 

Assistant County Attorney, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lenir Richardson appeals the district court’s orders denying 

her motion to remand and dismissing her complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for 

the reasons stated by the district court. See Richardson v. Faulk, 

No. 1:15-cv-01489-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2015; July 13, 2016). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, James F. Carroll, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Freestone Resources, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



---

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date: July 16, 2007















/s/ James F. Carroll





James F. Carroll









President and Chief Executive Officer
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home
 Complaints and Assistance
 Petitions
 On this page
About



About


An interested party may file with the Commission a written petition for: (1) the issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule designed to implement, interpret, or prescribe law, policy, organization, procedure, or practice requirements of the Commission [§502.51]; (2) the issuance of a declaratory order to terminate a controversy or to remove uncertainty [§502.68]; (3) leave to intervene in any proceeding before the Commission [§502.72]; and (4) reconsideration of a Commission decision or staff action [§502.261]. The petition must:



Set forth the petitioner’s grounds of interest in the subject matter;



Clearly and concisely describe the nature of the relief desired;



Include any relevant facts, views, arguments, statutes, and data;



Be verified (sworn);



Include an original and 15 copies; and



Be accompanied by a $228 filing fee (note: filing fee does not apply to petitions for leave to intervene or petitions for reconsideration).Additionally, if a petition is for the amendment or repeal of a rule, it must be accompanied by proof of service on all persons, if any, specifically named in such rule.  Refer to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, specifically Subpart H – Form Execution, and Service of Documents §502.111 et seq. for specific guidance on filing petitions with the Commission.  Replies to a petition may be filed within fifteen (15) days after the date of service and must conform to the requirements of §502.74. Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Emergency Filtration
Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Douglas Beplate, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Douglas Beplate
Douglas Beplate
Principal Executive Officer
Emergency Filtration Products, Inc.
July 30, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Poseidis,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB/A  for the  period  ended  November  30,  2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Louis
Pardo, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  September 13, 2006    /s/Louis Pardo
                             -------------------------------------
                             Louis Pardo
                             Chief Executive Officer and President



---------------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Tutuila F. TUVALU, a.k.a. Tuvalu Tutuila Fausia, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary SANDOR, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 08-56638.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 16, 2011.

Tuvalu Tutuila Fausia, Blythe, CA, pro se.

*769Jennifer L. Dolan, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Tutuila F. Tuvalu appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We dismiss.

After briefing was completed in this case, this court held that a certificate of appealability is required to challenge the denial of parole. *See Hayward v. Marshall,*603 F.3d 546, 554-55 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc). Because Tuvalu has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, we decline to certify his claims. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

All outstanding motions are denied as moot.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amazon Biotech, Inc., a Utah
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Mechael Kanovsky, Ph.D., Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Mechael Kanovsky, Ph.D.
------------------------------------------------
Mechael Kanovsky, Ph.D., Chief Financial Officer
March 17, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 31, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 50426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23565]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than November 16, 2017.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Timothy Derwin Murphy, Atwood, Illinois; to join Boulevard 
Financial, L.P., a qualified limited family partnership, as a general 
partner and thereby acquire voting shares of TNB Bancorp, Inc., and 
indirectly acquire shares of TNB Bank, both of Tuscola, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 25, 
2017.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-23565 Filed 10-30-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     SIX MONTHS       THREE MONTHS
                                                        ENDED             ENDED
                                                      JUNE 30,           JUNE 30,
                                                        2000               2000
                                                   ---------------    ---------------
                                                         (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

<S>                                                <C>                <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:

    Net income before extraordinary charge         $          60.9    $          35.9
    Add: Income taxes                                         39.8               23.4
         Equity income in joint venture                       (1.0)              (1.0)
         Fixed charges                                        41.0               20.4
                                                   ---------------    ---------------
Adjusted earnings                                  $         140.7    $          78.7
                                                   ===============    ===============


Fixed charges                                      $          41.0    $          20.4
                                                   ===============    ===============


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                             3.4                3.9
                                                   ===============    ===============
</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harvey S. Traison, Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

1.             the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, andfor, the period covered by the Report.

 
| Date:  May  10, 2004 | /s/ Harvey S. Traison |                             |
|---------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------|
|                      | Name:                 | Harvey S. Traison                |
|                      | Title:                | Senior Vice President and  Chief |
|                      |                  | Financial Officer                |
|                           |                       |                                  |  |

 

 

**The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not beingfiled as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.  A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and willbe retained by LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

1

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Fernando Arriola, Appellant.

[664 NYS2d 782]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.), rendered January 22, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of 8 to 16 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s requests to introduce or otherwise refer to a videotaped statement that he had made to an Assistant District Attorney but which the People did not introduce, although they introduced his earlier statements to the police. Since the videotaped statement came many hours after his statements to the police, there was a “definite, pronounced break” in defendant’s interrogation *(People v Chapple,*38 NY2d 112, 115), and the videotaped statement was not part of a continuous interrogation *(People v Armstrong,*210 AD2d 182, *lv denied*85 NY2d 935). In any event, exclusion of the videotape did not prejudice defendant’s claim of self-*35defense since the additional information contained therein would not have added anything of substance in this regard.

Defendant’s claim of error in connection with the prosecutor’s summation does not warrant reversal. The challenged portion of the prosecutor’s summation, when viewed in context, constituted appropriate response to the defense summation *(People v Marks,*6 NY2d 67, *cert denied*362 US 912), and fair comment on the evidence, presented within the broad bounds of rhetorical comments permissible in closing argument *(People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396). Moreover, the court’s final instructions to the jury prevented any possibility of prejudice. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rubin, Tom, Mazzarelli and Colabella, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,000
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        79
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,079)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                4,079
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (4,079)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (4,079)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (4,079)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.00)


</TABLE>