T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T FI TSG ERA LD J O H A N ES, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r . A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 05- 73687 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 629- 938 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d, M ay25, 2010 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . F i t s ge r a l d J oha ne s , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l a nd r e l i e f

unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve 

# FI LED JU N 03 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS05- 73687 2 ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e , H oxha v. A s h c r o ft , 319 F . 3d 1179, 1182 n. 4 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , a nd w e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v ie w . T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatJohanes e st abl i shed changed o re x tr a o r d in a ryc ir c u m s tan c e s to e x c u s e h is la te f ile da s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 2 0 8 . 4 (a)(4 ), (5 ). A cco rd i n g l y, Jo h an es’ asyl u m cl ai m fai l s. S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s f i nd i ng thatJohanes’ encoun t er w i th agr oup of

M us l i m s i n 1998 i n w hi c h the ya s ke d t o s e e hi s i de nt i f i c a t i on c a r d, havi ng the fr on tw i nd ow of hi s c arbrok en and a church grou p m ee t i ng di sturbance d idn o t a m o u n t to p a s t p e r s e c u tio n . Se e Na g o u lko v . I NS , 333 F . 3d 1012, 1016 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . F u rth er, sub st an t i al ev i d en ce sup p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s co n cl u si o n th atJo h an es has notdem on strat ed the re qu i si t e i nd i vi du al i ze d ri sk of pers ec ut i on as a C hri st i an to e s tab lis h ac le a rp r o b ab ilityo f p e r s e c u tio n . Se e H

ox ha , 319 F . 3d a t1184- 85, W akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1049, 1064- 65 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . F urthe r , on the r e c or d, J oha ne s f

a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h apa tt e rn orpr a c t i c e of pe r s e c ut i on of

C hr i s t i ans in I n d o n e s ia . Se e id . a t1060- 61.05- 73687 3 J oha ne s doe s notr a i s e a nya r gum e nt s i n hi s ope ni ng br i e f r e gar di ng the a g e n c y ’s d e n ia l o f

h is C A T c la im , th e r e f

o r e it is w a iv e d . See M art i nez- Serran o v. I N S , 94 F . 3d 12 56 , 12 59 -60 (9th C i r. 19 96 ) ( i ss ues notsupp ort ed by ar gu m entar e deem ed w ai ved). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.