alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0413

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ROBERT MURRAY GIBBONS, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 16, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 7 2022

02/07/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0413
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of CoConnect, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark L.
Baum, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify the
following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Mark L.
Baum


Mark L.
Baum


Interim
President and Chief Executive Officer





August
17, 2008
MICHAEL
TROKEY & COMPANY, P.C.





CONSENT
OF MICHAEL TROKEY & COMPANY, P.C.





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
333-136607 and 333-140515) on Form S-8 of Liberty Bancorp, Inc. of our report
dated December 22, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements as of
September 30, 2008 of Liberty Bancorp, Inc. which appears in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.





/s/
      Michael Trokey & Company, P.C.Certified
      Public Accountants





December
23, 2008


St.
Louis, Missouri
FLRA NEWS

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY - WASHINGTON, DC 20424

Contact: Eric Prag FLRA.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 771-444-5859 March 27, 2023

Greg Weddle named Regional Director of FLRA Chicago Regional Office

Today, the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) has announced the appointment of Greg 

Weddle as the Regional Director of the FLRA’s Chicago Regional Office. In this position, Mr. 

Weddle will be responsible for the investigation and resolution of representation and unfairlabor-practice cases filed under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the 

Statute) in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, 

Ohio, Puerto Rico, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.

Mr. Weddle began his career with the FLRA in the Chicago Regional Office in 1996. He has 

served as a Senior Attorney, as Chicago Regional Attorney beginning in August 2014, and as 

Acting Regional Director beginning in May 2021. Before joining the FLRA, Mr. Weddle worked 

for the Social Security Administration in Michigan from 1986 to 1993. Mr. Weddle received a 

Bachelor of Science degree in Political Science and Public Service from Northern Illinois 

University and a Juris Doctor degree from Loyola University Chicago School of Law. He is 

admitted to the Illinois Bar.

The FLRA Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is the independent investigative and 

prosecutorial component of the FLRA. Through its five regional offices, the OGC investigates, 

settles, and prosecutes unfair labor practice charges, resolves representation disputes, including 

the conduct of secret ballot elections, and provides training to union and management 

representatives.

For more information on the OGC and its leadership, click here.

###

The FLRA administers the labor-management relations program for 2.1 million non-Postal federal 

employees worldwide, approximately 1.2 million of whom are represented in 2,200 bargaining 

units. It is charged with providing leadership in establishing policies and guidance related to 

federal sector labor-management relations and with resolving disputes under, and ensuring 

compliance with, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2006,                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                             |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended December 31, 2006, fairly represents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of 4308,                Inc. |

| Date:     March                16, 2007                                              |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                          |
| 4308,                Inc.                                                                                     |
|                                                                                                          |
| By:                /s/                *Michael                Raleigh*                                        |
| Michael                Raleigh Chief                Executive Officer, Chief Financial                Officer |
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 11, 2016

NO. 03-15-00380-CV

Michael Warren, Appellant

v.

Krystal Charlene Ulatoski, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

REVERSED AND RENDERED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on July 20, 2015. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the 

court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and renders judgment 

denying appellee’s petition to modify the parent-child relationship. Appellee shall pay all costs 

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15302 and #15303; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-00130]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 6.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA—4337—DR), dated 09/10/2017.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Irma.                    

*Incident Period:*                         09/04/2017 through 10/18/2017.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 10/20/2017.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/09/2017.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/11/2018.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of FLORIDA, dated 09/10/2017, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 09/04/2017 through 10/18/2017. All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2017-23508 Filed 10-27-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
----

| (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 of FindEx.com, Inc. (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FindEx.com, Inc. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Steven Malone                                      |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Steven Malone                                          |
|   |   | President                                              |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |

----
#### BRUCE FELDER *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 32210)

Beach, Robinson and Sheldon, Js.

Argued January 30

officially released February 28, 2012

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Anthony VALENTINE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50279.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed Feb. 23, 2011.

Thomas Blanchard Snyder, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kristi A. Hughes, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gary Anthony Valentine appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of marijuana and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Valentine contends that the district court erred in determining that the government’s substantial assistance motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) permitted it to consider only factors related to substantial assistance, and not the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), in determining the extent of the downward departure. This contention is foreclosed by *United States*
      *678
      *v. Jackson,*577 F.3d 1032, 1036 (9th Cir.2009).

Valentine also contends that his sentence was substantively unreasonable in light of the section 3553(a) factors. Because the district court could not reduce Valentine’s sentence on the basis of those factors, this contention fails. *See id.*

AFFIRMED.

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Thomas Rogers, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TiVo Inc.;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: February 19, 2010



/s/    THOMAS ROGERSThomas RogersPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peymon MOTTAHEDEH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-56980.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2010.

Thomas D. Coker, Esquire, USLA-Of-fice of the U.S. Attorney Los Angeles, CA, Bruce R. Ellisen, Curtis Clarence Pett, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Peymon Mottahedeh, Phelan, CA, pro se.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Peymon Mottahedeh appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment for the United States in its action seeking to reduce federal income tax assessments to judgment. We dismiss.

We lack jurisdiction to review the underlying judgment because Mottahedeh’s notice of appeal was filed more than sixty days after entry of judgment. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); *Hostler v. Groves,*912 F.2d 1158, 1160 (9th Cir.1990) (“[W]e must address the question [of appellate jurisdiction] *sua sponte. Miller v. Marriott Int’l, Inc.,*300 F.3d 1061, 1063 (9th Cir.2002) (“The filing of an effective notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement which cannot be waived.”). The motion for reconsideration of the denial of Mottahedeh’s motion to suppress evidence did not toll the time to appeal from the judgment. *See*Fed.R.App. P. 4(a)(4)(A) (listing tolling motions).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating
Officer/Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating
Officer/Chief Financial Officer of InforMax, Inc. (the Company), each hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

| |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | (a) |  | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended September
30, 2002 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| |  | (b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.                                                                                                                    

| |  |                                                                                                  
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /S/ Andrew P. Whiteley                                                                           
| |  |                                                                                                  
| |  | Andrew P. Whiteley
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
November 14, 2002
| |  |                                                                                                  
| |  |                                                                                                  
| |  | /S/ John M. Green                                                                                
| |  |                                                                                                  
| |  | John M. Green
Chief Operating Officer/Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  **GROVER**

**SELLERS lf**  **-rromwv**

**GLNLRAL** on. Roscoe **P.wge DSsCrSct**  **Attorney mson,**  **TG?X?,S Dec.r**  **sir:** OpMon No, Q-7326 He: FW A & H 

### College hire a District Field Ae&etant for Rodent &&,rol Servicewho has be a felony, to-t: U0 iW% in receiptof your recent of this departmenton the above etatedmat letter of requestas followe:

YOW question 

### in the af'fimative. Pours very truly
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1456 

CA 11-00948 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

BONICA LESCENSKI, INDIVIDUALLY, AND BONICA 

LESCENSKI, AS FIDUCIARY OF THE ESTATE OF 

ROBERT A. SMITH, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL J. WILLIAMS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (JOHN A. CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

MACKENZIE HUGHES LLP, SYRACUSE (MARK R. SCHLEGEL OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oswego County (James

W. McCarthy, J.), entered July 13, 2010 in a wrongful death action. 

The order granted the motion of defendant for summary judgment

dismissing the complaint. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action, individually and as

fiduciary of the estate of Robert A. Smith (decedent), seeking damages

for the wrongful death of decedent as the result of an accident in a

four-way intersection controlled by a traffic light. That accident

occurred when the vehicle driven by decedent’s wife and in which

decedent was a passenger collided with the vehicle driven by

defendant. We reject plaintiff’s contention that Supreme Court erred

in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the

complaint. It is well settled that a driver “who has the right[-]of[-

]way is entitled to anticipate that [the drivers of] other vehicles

will obey the traffic laws that require them to yield” (Namisnak v

Martin, 244 AD2d 258, 260; see Rogers v Edelman, 79 AD3d 1803; Wallace

v Kuhn, 23 AD3d 1042, 1043). Defendant “met his initial burden by

establishing as a matter of law ‘that the sole proximate cause of the

accident was [the] failure [of decedent’s wife] to yield the right[-

]of[-]way’ to [defendant]” (Guadagno v Norward, 43 AD3d 1432, 1433;

see Galvin v Zacholl, 302 AD2d 965, 967, lv denied 100 NY2d 512;

Kelsey v Degan, 266 AD2d 843). In support of the motion, defendant

established that, as decedent’s wife approached the intersection,

defendant was traveling at a lawful rate of speed, had the

right-of-way with respect to her vehicle and did not have an

opportunity to avoid the accident. 
-2- 1456 

CA 11-00948 

In opposition to the motion, plaintiff failed to raise a triable

issue of fact whether defendant was negligent based on his speed or

failure to keep a proper lookout (see generally Zuckerman v City of

New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). Contrary to plaintiff’s contention,

“[t]he speculative affidavit of [her] expert containing alternative

explanations concerning the manner in which the accident occurred is

insufficient to defeat the motion” (Van Ostberg v Crane, 273 AD2d 895,

896; see Wasson v Szafarski, 6 AD3d 1182).

Entered: December 30, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, November 13, 2017, 01:00 p.m. to November 13, 2017, 04:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6710 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 03, 2017, 82 FR 46084.                

The meeting date has changed from November 13, 2017, 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to November 27, 2017, 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 17, 2017.

Michelle Trout,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-22909 Filed 10-20-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P