alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
unaudited  Consolidated Balance Sheet as at September 30, 1999 and the unaudited
Consolidated Statement of Loss for the six month period ended September 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             1107
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     71409
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                        1725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  74241
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    74952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            170994
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                           7311
<OTHER-SE>                                      (103353)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      74952
<SALES>                                           49242
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  49242
<CGS>                                             31282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     31282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 161202
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (144445)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (144445)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (144445)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.02)


</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 351 

To expand the boundary of the Minute Man National Historical Park in 

the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to include Barrett’s Farm, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2009 

Ms. TSONGAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To expand the boundary of the Minute Man National Historical Park in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to include Barrett’s Farm, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Minute Man National 

5 Historical Park Boundary Revision Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MINUTE MAN NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK BOUND7 ARY REVISION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The boundary of the Minute Man 

9 National Historical Park is modified to include the area 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 351 IH

1 as generally depicted on the map titled ‘‘Minute Man Na2 tional Historical Park Proposed Boundary’’, numbered 

3 406/81001, and dated July 2007. The map shall be on 

4 file and available for inspection in the appropriate offices 

5 of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. 

6 (b) ACQUISITION OF LANDS.—The Secretary of the 

7 Interior may acquire land or interest in land with the area 

8 described in subsection (a), by purchase from willing sell9 ers with donated or appropriated funds, by donation, or 

10 by exchange. 

11 (c) ADMINISTRATION OF LANDS.—Lands added to 

12 the park under this section shall be administered by the 

13 Secretary of the Interior as part of the Minute Man Na14 tional Historical Park in accordance with applicable laws 

15 and regulations. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 UNDER
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
 
 I, Michael J. Lewis, Chief Financial Officer of Collectors Universe, Inc. certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Collectors Universe, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003;
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
 made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
 condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
  4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) for the registrant and we have:
  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
 effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
 fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
 registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
 likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
 over financial reporting.
 
 Date: November 14, 2003

/s/ MICHAEL J. LEWISMichael J. LewisChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23328]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Galephar 
Pharmaceutical Research, Inc.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration on or before November 27, 2017. 
Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before November 27, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for 
hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: 
Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All 
requests for hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, 
Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division 
(``Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, 
appendix to subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on August 
2, 2017, Galephar Pharmaceutical Research, Inc., #100 Carr 198, 
Industrial Park, Juncos, Puerto Rico 00777-3873 applied to be 
registered as an importer of hydromorphone (9150), a basic class of 
controlled substance in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance in 
finished dosage form for clinical trials, research and analytical 
purposes.
    The import of this class of controlled substance will be granted 
only for analytical testing, research, and clinical trials. This 
authorization does not extend to the import of a finished FDA approved 
or non-approved dosage form for commercial sale.

    Dated: October 18, 2017.
Demetra Ashley,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-23328 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**LUIS MIGUEL NAVEDO,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 95 MM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 20th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Lea ve to File Petition** 

**for Allowance of Appeal** Nunc Pro Tunc **is** GRANTED **. Although counsel may have**

**been negligent in failing to promptly seek** nunc pro tunc **relief, Petitioner is entitled to a**

**counsel-filed Petition for Allowance of Appeal.** See **Pa.R.Crim.P. 122(B). Counsel is**

DIRECTED **to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 1 5 days.**
Answer to Complaint Form

Before the Federal Maritime Commission

Answer

______ v. ______

[Complainant] [Respondent]

Docket No. ____

The above-named respondent, for answer to the complaint in this proceeding, states:

I. [State in this and subsequent paragraphs to be numbered II, III, etc., appropriate and responsive admissions, 

denials, and averments, specifically answering the complaint, paragraph by paragraph.]

Wherefore respondent prays that the complaint in this proceeding be dismissed.

____________________

[Name and signature of respondent]

By____________________

[Title of Officer]

____________________

[Respondent’s address, telephone number, and email address]

____________________

[Signature of attorney or representative of respondent]

____________________

[Attorney’s or representative’s address, telephone number, and email address]

Date ______________________.

Verification

State of ________, County of __________, ss: _________, ____________ being first duly sworn on oath 

deposes and says that he (she) is

____________________

[The complainant, or, if a firm, association, or corporation, state the capacity of the affiant]

and is the person who signed the foregoing complaint; that he (she) has read the complaint and that the facts 

stated therein, upon information received from others, affiant believes to be true.

Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the State of _______________, County of 

______________ this _______ day ________, 20____.

[Seal]____________________

(Notary Public)

My Commission expires ____.

Certificate of Service

[See §502.114.]
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V EN T H C IR C U IT J ULY 7, 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 06- 1115 0 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 05-00301 -CV -BBM- 1 MIC HAEL P. MURPHY, Pl ai nti ff -Appe llant, ve rs us MIC HELLE MARTIN, etal., D ef en dants , OF FICE R JOHNS , De fendant-Appellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the N orthe rnD istri ct

of G eo rg ia

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (J ul y 7, 200 6) Be fo re D U BIN A , BL A CK and H U L L , Ci rc uit

Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:2

Mi ch ae l P . Murp hy

appe al s th e dis tr ic t c ourt’ s gr an t of sum m ar y j udgm en t to O ff ic er Co urtne y Joh ns i n M ur

phy ’ s 42 U . S. C. § 19 83 a ct ion . Murp hy a sse rt s the dis tr ic t c ourt e rr ed

in: ( 1) hol din g he ha d no t e xhaust ed his r em ed ie s un de r the Pr iso n L iti gatio n R ef

orm A ct , 42 U . S. C. § 19 97e (a ); ( 2) c onc lud ing an a ct ion cannot be broug ht und er § 1983 for violatio ns of civil rights that are defined as

“ torture” under 18 U. S. C. § 234 0A; and (3) dec linin g to exercise supplem ental j ur isd ic tio n ov er

his r em ai nin g st at e lawc la im s. A ft er ade nov o r ev ie wof

the parties’ argum ents and the record, we aff irm for the r easons stated in th e district co urt’ s w el l- re as one d F eb ru ar y 13, 200 6, O rd er

gr an tin g Jo hns’ m oti on f or su m m ary jud gm en t. AFFIR MED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF, AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, INCLUDED IN REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,527
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (84)
<INVENTORY>                                      9,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,898
<PP&E>                                           4,306
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,542)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,868
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,226
<SALES>                                         12,588
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,588
<CGS>                                            6,913
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    502
<INCOME-TAX>                                       234
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                268
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       268
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
----

| (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 of FindEx.com, Inc. (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FindEx.com, Inc. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Steven Malone                                      |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Steven Malone                                          |
|   |   | President                                              |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |

----
#### Tri SANBUDIARTO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71559.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 14, 2011.

Gihan L. Thomas, Esquire, Law Offices of Gihan L. Thomas, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Terri Leon-Benner, Esquire, OIL, Monica Antoun, Esquire, Barry J. Pettinato, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Tri Sanbudiarto, native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings. *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 & n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Sanbudiarto’s untimely asylum application is excused by changed or extraordinary circumstances. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(D); *Ramadan v. Gonzales,*479 F.3d 646, 657-58 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam); *Toj-Culpatan v. Holder,*612 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th Cir.2010) (per cu-*689riam). Accordingly, Sanbudiarto’s asylum claim fails.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that the instances of discrimination, the attack on Sanbudiarto’s home and the blocking of the church entrance on Christmas in 1999, did not rise to the level of past persecution. *See Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1016-18 (9th Cir.2003). In addition, substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Sanbudiarto failed to demonstrate a clear probability of future persecution because he can relocate to another part of Indonesia. *See Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 995, 998-99 (9th Cir.2003) (country report supports the agency’s finding that petitioner could relocate safely). Accordingly, Sanbudiarto’s withholding of removal claim fails.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Sanbudiarto has not established that any torture he may suffer would be by or with the acquiescence of the Indonesian government. *See Silaya v. Mukasey,*524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir.2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
| 1.     | Such      Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year      ended December 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of 4301,  Inc. |

| Date:      March 13,  2008                                        |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                   |
| 4301,      Inc.                                                        |
|                                                                   |
| By:      /s/      Yusuke      Matsuo                                   |
| Yusuke      MatsuoChief      Executive Officer, Chief FinancialOfficer |
NO. 12-14-00242-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

CATHY ANN WALKER, 

APPELLANT

V.

GOOD SHEPHERD MEDICAL 

CENTER, INC.,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW #2

GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). 

Appellant perfected her appeal on August 20, 2014. The clerk’s record was filed on 

September 9, 2014, making Appellant’s brief due on or before October 9, 2014. 

When Appellant failed to file her brief by the due date, this court notified Appellant on

October 13, 2014, that the brief was past due. The notice warned that if no motion for extension 

of time to file the brief was received by October 23, 2014, the appeal would be dismissed for 

want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b). Further, the notice 

informed Appellant that the motion for extension of time must contain a reasonable explanation 

for her failure to file the brief and a showing that Appellee had not suffered material injury 

thereby.

To date, Appellant has neither complied with, nor otherwise responded to, this court’s

October 13, 2014 notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Opinion delivered October 30, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

OCTOBER 30, 2014

NO. 12-14-00242-CV

CATHY ANN WALKER,

Appellant

V.

GOOD SHEPHERD MEDICAL CENTER, INC.,

Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2 

of Gregg County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2014-0170-C)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed for want of 

prosecution.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision 

be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.