alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,000
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        79
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,079)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   3,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (3,079)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (3,079)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (3,079)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form
  10-Q of EWRX Internet Systems for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, I, Jessica
  Q. Wang, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of EWRX Internet
  Systems hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
  and belief, that:

|1. | Such quarterly report of Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending
        June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|2. | The information contained in such quarterly report of Form
        10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, fairly represents in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of EWRX Internet
        Systems.

Date: October 2, 2009

EWRX Internet Systems

By:    /s/ Jessica Q. Wang
         Jessica Q. Wang
         Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer

---
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




Confidential Correspondence




April 13, 2007




[NAME]




[ADDRESS]




Dear [FIRST NAME]:



As you know, Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “Universal”) has signed a
merger agreement with Hanover Compressor Company. Under the terms of the merger agreement, both
companies will be combined in a merger of equals to create a new company. While the merger is
still subject to regulatory and shareholder approval, we remain optimistic that these approvals
will be granted and the merger will close some time in the third quarter of 2007.



As a key employee, your participation in Universal’s continuing operations during this process will
be critical to enable Universal to successfully consummate the merger. As a result we are pleased
to provide you with a “Retention Bonus” in the amount of $XXXX to encourage you to stay with
Universal through your “Key Date.” For these purposes, your Key Date will be the later of 6 months
after the closing date of the merger or April 30, 2008. If you remain with the Company or its
successor through your Key Date, the Retention Bonus will be paid to you in a single lump sum
within 10 days after the Key Date. If you terminate your employment with the Company or its
successor prior to the Key Date, you will forfeit your right to receive the Retention Bonus. In
the event that your employment is terminated by the Company or its successor for any reason other
than cause, you will be entitled to an accelerated payment of your Retention Bonus within 10 days
of such event. All Retention Bonus payments are subject to the terms, conditions and contingencies
contained in the Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. Retention Bonus Plan (the “Retention Plan”),
a copy of which is included with this letter.



It is important that your Retention Bonus information be kept confidential, as it only pertains to
you. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the Retention Plan, please direct those
questions to your Human Resources representative.



This letter is not a contract of employment or an agreement of employment for a definite term.
Except as otherwise required by applicable law, your employment remains terminable at will by
either party, at any time and for any reason or no reason. This letter may not be amended or
modified except through a written amendment signed by the Company or its successor and you. This
letter is governed by and subject to the terms of the Retention Plan. In the event there are
differences between the terms of this letter and the Retention Plan, please understand that the
Retention Plan document controls.



If you understand and agree to the above, please sign below and return to Rick Klein – Director of
Human Resources. With your help, we can make this merger a success. We look forward to working
with you during this exciting time.




Sincerely,




Executive Officer






Accepted and Agreed:




                                                            

Date:
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-50231 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JOHNNY TREJO, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:94-CR-174-13
Before BENAVIDES, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Johnny Trejo, federal prisoner # 57448-080, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and c o n s p i r acy to launder money. The instant notice of appeal was filed on March 4, 2011, more than sixteen years after the October 1994 final judgment was entered and well beyond the time for extending the appeal period under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(4). See F E D . R. AP P . P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i), (b)(4). Trejo’s appeal, which is far outside the time limit, is DISMISSED. See United States v. Leijano-Cruz , 473 F.3d 571, 574 U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 24, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-50231 Document: 00511581754 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/24/2011No. 11-50231

(5th Cir. 2 0 0 6)

. His motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT.

2 Case: 11-50231 Document: 00511581754 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/24/2011
COMPROMISE AGREEMENT

This Agreement is entered into between:

(1) the Federal Maritime Commission, hereinafter referred to as Commission, and

(2) Carlo Shipping International, Inc. dba CSI Logistics (CSI), hereinafter referred to as 

Respondent.

Whereas the Commission is considering the institution of an assessment proceeding against 

Respondent for the recovery of civil penalties for alleged violations of sections 10(b)(11) and 10(b)(2)(A)

of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. §§ 41104(11) and 41104(2)(A);

Whereas this course of action is the result of alleged practices believed by the Commission to have 

been engaged in by Respondent, to wit:

CSI knowingly and willfully accepted from, and transported cargo for, the 

account of ocean transportation intermediaries, none of which had a 

published tariff, a bond, insurance or other surety as required by the 

Shipping Act of 1984.

CSI provided transportation in the liner trade that was not in accordance 

with the rates and charges set forth in its published tariff.

Whereas, the Commission has authority under section 13(c) of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. 

§ 41109(a)-(b), and Part 502 of the Commission’s Regulations, 46 C.F.R. Part 502, to compromise and 

collect civil penalties;

Whereas, Respondent has terminated the practices which are the basis of the alleged violations set 

forth herein, and has committed to maintain measures designed to eliminate these practices by Respondent 

in the future.

Now Therefore, in consideration of the premises herein, and in compromise of all civil penalties 

arising from the alleged violations set forth and described herein, Respondent and the Commission hereby 

agree upon the following terms of settlement:
1. Respondent shall make monetary payment to the Commission by cashier’s or certified

check in the total amount of $32,500.

2. This instrument shall forever bar the commencement or institution of any assessment 

proceeding or other claim for recovery of civil penalties from Respondent, its officers, 

directors, or employees arising from the alleged violations set forth above that occurred 

between April 5, 2013 and June 25, 2015.

3. It is expressly understood that this Agreement is not, and is not to be construed as, an 

admission by Respondent to the alleged violations set forth above.

4. This agreement is subject to approval by the Commission’s Managing Director in 

accordance with 46 C.F.R. § 502.604.

CARLO SHIPPING INTERNATIONAL, INC. dba CSI LOGISTICS

 Signature: _____________________________ 

 Printed Name: __________________________ 

 Title: _________________________________ 

 Date: _________________________________ 

APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE

The above Terms and Conditions and Amount of Consideration are hereby approved and accepted:

By the Federal Maritime Commission:

_________________________________________

Peter J. King, Director (Date)

Bureau of Enforcement

_________________________________________________

Vern W. Hill, Managing Director (Date)
EX-35 (f)
(logo) WELLS FARGO


Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 24, 2007


Banc of America Funding Corporation
214 North Tyron Street
Charlotte, NC 28255


RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Banc of America Funding 2006-2 Trust


Per Section 3.20 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 2/27/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:


(a)   a review of the activities of such party during the preceding calendar
      year or portion thereof and of performance of such party under this
      Agreement has been made under such officers' supervision and


(b)   to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
      has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
      respects throughout such year, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill
      any such obligation in any material respect, specifying each such failure
      known to such officer and the nature and status thereof.


Certified By:
/s/ Scott Strack
Scott Strack, Vice President


Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3546 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3546

To amend the Small Business Act to make permanent the Community Express 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2009

 Mr. Sestak (for himself, Ms. Bordallo, and Mr. Kagen) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Small Business Act to make permanent the Community Express 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Lending Promotion Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. COMMUNITY EXPRESS PROGRAM.

    Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating the second paragraph (32), as added by 
        section 208 of the Military Reservist and Veteran Small 
        Business Reauthorization and Opportunity Act of 2008 (Public 
        Law 110-186; 122 Stat. 631), as paragraph (33); and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(34) Community express program.--
                    ``(A) Permanent establishment.--The Administrator 
                shall carry out a Community Express Program in 
                accordance with this paragraph.
                    ``(B) Administration of program.--Except as 
                otherwise provided under this paragraph, the 
                Administrator shall carry out the Community Express 
                Program in the same manner as the Community Express 
                Pilot Program of the Administration, as in effect on 
                September 8, 2009.
                    ``(C) Nonapplicability of pilot program 
                limitations.--No limitation under paragraph (25)(A) 
                applies to the Community Express Program under this 
                paragraph.''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered July 29, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00526-CR

CHRISTIAN LANE-CLEMENT COOK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-81198-2013

ORDER

The Court GRANTS court reporter Susan Maienschein’s July 28, 2015 request for an 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We ORDER Ms. Maienschein to file the 

complete reporter’s record within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We ORDER the Collin County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record within FIFTEEN 

DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Andrea Stroh Thompson, Collin 

County District Clerk; Susan Maienschein, official court reporter, 416th Judicial District Court, 

and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.2

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert J. Scott, certify that:

 
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Viva International, Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.        The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)       Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.        The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
| Dated: August 16, 2006 | By: */s/ Robert J. Scott* |
|------------------------|---------------------------|

Robert J. Scott, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 31.2









CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





REQUIRED BY RULE 13A - 14(A) OR RULE 15D - 14(A)





I, Bob Bates, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Inova Technology Inc.





2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control    over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:September 18, 2009
/s/Bob BatesChief Financial Officer
#### Martiniano PACHECO-TELLEZ, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General; Michael Chertoff, U.S. DHS Secretary, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 05-17383.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 5, 2008.

Martiniano Pacheco-Tellez, Eloy, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Cynthia M. Parsons, USPX-Offiee of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondents-Appellees.

*712Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Martiniano Pacheco-Tellez, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(a), *Puri v. Gonzales,*464 F.3d 1038, 1040 (9th Cir.2006), and we affirm.

Reviewing de novo, *id.,*we conclude that the district court lacked jurisdiction over Pacheeo-Tellez’s petition because it was filed on November 14, 2005, after the REAL ID Act’s effective date. *See id.*at 1041 (“[Ajfter May 11, 2005, the only means for judicial review of Puri’s removal order was a petition for review in this court.”). Moreover, Pacheco-Tellez exercised his right to file a petition for review, which we dismissed in *Pacheco-Tellez v. Gonzales,*No. 05-71741 (9th Cir. July 21, 2005) (order). *See Puri,*464 F.3d at 1043 (declining to transfer habeas petition and noting that “Puri was aware of the proper procedure for review, as evidenced by the fact that he also filed a petition for review with this court”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.