alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, James F. Carroll, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Freestone Resources, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



---

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date: October 16, 2007















/s/ James F. Carroll





James F. Carroll









President and Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 29, 2014

No. 04-14-00624-CR

Darrell Lee JACKSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR2210

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion issued this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is so ORDERED on October 29, 2014.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of October, 2014.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3541 

For the relief of Rafael Camacho, Rosa B. Camacho, and Rosa Camacho. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2009 

Ms. WATERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Rafael Camacho, Rosa B. Camacho, and 

Rosa Camacho. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR RAFAEL 

4 CAMACHO, ROSA B. CAMACHO, AND ROSA 

5 CAMACHO. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act, Rafael Camacho, Rosa B. Camacho, and Rosa 

9 Camacho shall each be eligible for issuance of an immi10 grant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 

11 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3541 IH

1 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec2 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 

3 permanent resident. 

4 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Rafael Camacho, 

5 Rosa B. Camacho, or Rosa Camacho enters the United 

6 States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 

7 he or she shall be considered to have entered and remained 

8 lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for ad9 justment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 

10 and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of 

11 this Act. 

12 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

13 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap14 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica15 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

16 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

17 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

18 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res19 idence to Rafael Camacho, Rosa B. Camacho, and Rosa 

20 Camacho, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 

21 officer to reduce by 3, during the current or next following 

22 fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

23 made available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth 

24 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

25 Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3541 IH

1 that are made available to natives of the country of the 

2 aliens’ birth under section 202(e) of such Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of CoConnect, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, Richard Ferguson and Dean H. Becker hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:  a. the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Richard Ferguson Richard Ferguson, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  May 19, 2007     /s/ Dean H. Becker Dean H. Becker, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  May 21, 2007  10
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencyShares® Mexican Peso Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010, as amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Arruda, Chief Financial Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Trust.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: March 10, 2011         
|                             
|/s/ JOSEPH ARRUDA            
|Joseph Arruda*               
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Joseph Arruda is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the
Registrant.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-50955

Summary Calendar

DANIEL COBBLE,

Petitioner−Appellant,

versus

THE BROWN SCHOOL, a Private Mental Institution; 

CITY OF SAN MARCOS TEXAS,

Respondents−Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:14-CV-689

Before SMITH, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Daniel Cobble, Georgia prisoner # 758572, moves to proceed in forma 

pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal of the dismissal, without prejudice, of his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2241 petition. The district court denied his motion to proceed IFP on appeal, 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 27, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-50955 Document: 00512952500 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/27/2015
No. 14-50955

certifying that the appeal was not taken in good faith. By moving in this court 

for IFP status, Cobble is challenging that certification. See Baugh v. Taylor, 

117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

The district court sitting in the Western District of Texas determined 

that it lacked jurisdiction over Cobble’s petition because he was not in custody 

in Texas. A petitioner must be in custody as defined in § 2241(c)(3) in order to 

seek relief under § 2241. See Braden v. 30th Judicial Cir. Ct. of Ky., 410 U.S. 

484, 488 (1973). He is in custody if he attacks his current confinement or, 

under certain circumstances, a potential future confinement. Id. at 488−89 &

n.4. Cobble, though, is not currently confined in Texas, nor does he allege that 

Texas is attempting to confine him in the future. Accordingly, there is no arguable issue that he is in custody for purposes of raising claims challenging confinement in Texas. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because Cobble is not in custody in Texas, he cannot obtain the relief he 

seeks under § 2241. The appeal is without arguable merit and thus is frivolous. 

The motion to proceed IFP is DENIED, see Howard, 707 F.2d at 219−20, and

the appeal is DISMISSED, see Baugh, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

Cobble’s motion for bond pending appeal is DENIED.

2

 Case: 14-50955 Document: 00512952500 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/27/2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Inter-American Foundation

# TIME AND DATE:

November 6, 2017, 1:30 p.m.-5:00 p.m.

# PLACE:

Offices of Baker/McKenzie LLP, 815 Connecticut Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20006.

# STATUS:

Meeting of the Board of Directors with the Advisory Council, Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 Approval of the Minutes of the meetings held in April, May, and September 2017

 Advisory Council Membership Update

 Management Report

 IAF Mexico Earthquake Response

 New Business

 Adjournment

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Paul Zimmerman, General Counsel, (202) 683-7118.

Paul Zimmerman,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2017-23545 Filed 10-25-17; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7025-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Leo LOSTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-31099

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 23, 2010.

Cristina Walker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Betty Lee Marak, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Shreveport, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Leo Loston, Oakdale, LA, pro se.

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leo Loston has moved for *945leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Loston has filed a response in which he argues that the district court erred in denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion because he is eligible for relief under Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines and because relief was warranted. Loston also seeks the appointment of new counsel. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Loston’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, Loston’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0123

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JASON HARRISON,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant t o the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Luke Berger , District Judg e . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 18 2020

11/18/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0123
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

          - [CDC-2017-0048; Docket Number NIOSH-156-C]

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

NIOSH announces the availability of the following four Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) Value Profile documents: Acetonitrile [CAS No. 75-05-8], Chloroacetonitrile [CAS No. 107-14-2], Methacrylonitrile [CAS No. 126-98-7], and Nitrogen dioxide [CAS No. 10102-44-0].

# DATES:

The final IDLH Value Profile documents were published on September 29, 2017.

# ADDRESSES:

                        These documents may be obtained at the following link:                         *https://www.cdc.gov/​niosh/​idlh/​default.html*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        R. Todd Niemeier, MS, CIH, NIOSH, Education and Information Division (EID), Robert A. Taft Laboratories, 1090 Tusculum Ave., MS-C32, Cincinnati, OH 45226, phone 513/533-8166 (not a toll-free number), email:                         *rbn4@cdc.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On May 5, 2017, NIOSH published a request for public review in the                     **Federal Register**                     [82 FR 21239] on IDLH Value profiles. We did not receive public comments, but did receive peer and stakeholder comments. These comments received were reviewed and addressed where appropriate.                

Frank Hearl,

Chief of Staff, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2017-23665 Filed 10-30-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3557 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3557

  To provide an emergency cost-of-living increase for Social Security 
                           benefits for 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 2009

  Mr. Jones introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide an emergency cost-of-living increase for Social Security 
                           benefits for 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMERGENCY COST-OF-LIVING INCREASE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY 
              BENEFITS FOR 2010.

    Notwithstanding any provision of section 215(i) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 415(i)) to the contrary--
            (1) for purposes of such section 215(i), the applicable 
        increase percentage (as defined in section 215(i)(1)(C) of such 
        Act) with respect to the base quarter (as defined in section 
        215(i)(1)(A)(i) of such Act) in 2009 shall be deemed to be 
        equal to the average of the 10 applicable increase percentages 
        (as so defined) with respect to the base quarters (as so 
        defined) in the 10 calendar years preceding 2009 (rounded to 
        the nearest one-tenth of 1 percent); and
            (2) for purposes of such section 215(i) (and any provision 
        of law cross-referring to such section 215(i) or otherwise 
        providing for increases based on increases occurring under such 
        section 215(i)), the increase under section 215(i)(2)(A)(ii) of 
        such Act resulting from the application of this section shall 
        be deemed to be an increase under such section 215(i) and not a 
        general benefit increase.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO.  2-06-414-CR

					       2-06-415-CR

JOSEPH VICTOR CASTANEDA	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. THREE OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	Appellant Joseph Victor Castaneda is attempting to appeal the trial court’s judgment adjudicating his guilt for possession of methamphetamine.  We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

	The trial court signed the judgment on October 6, 2006, and no motion for new trial was filed.  Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal was due November 6, 2006,2 but it was not filed until November 29, 2006.  We notified appellant by letter of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the notice of appeal is untimely.3  In response, appellant’s counsel states that he “appreciates the Court’s jurisdictional concern” and that he will assist appellant in preparing an application for writ of habeas corpus to request an out-of-time appeal from the court of criminal appeals.  Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.	

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 11, 2007
Exhibit 99.1

Pending legal actions before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission for each coal mine of which the Company is an operator
as required by §1503(a)(3) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.



|                           |  |               
|-------------------------- |  | --------------
|MINE                       |  | DOCKET NO.    
|Mine #5  Previously Owned |  | SE 2010-717   
|                           | 
|Mine #5  Previously Owned |  | SE 2010-846   
|                           | 
|Mine No. 14                |  | SE 2010-1025-R
|                           | 
|Mine No. 14                |  | SE 2010-1026-R
|                           | 
|Mine No. 14                |  | SE 2010-1027-R