alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of change of meeting date.

# SUMMARY:

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         notice that was originally published on October 5, 2017, (Volume 82, Number 192, Page 46611), the meeting date is now changed. The new date for the meeting is, Tuesday, November 14, 2017.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 14, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or (214) 413-6523.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be held Tuesday, November 21, 2017, at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Lisa Billups. For more information please contact Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6523, or write TAP Office 1114 Commerce Street, Dallas, TX 75242-1021, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The committee will be discussing various issues related to the Taxpayer Assistance Centers and public input is welcomed.

Dated: October 18, 2017

Antoinette Ross,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2017-23074 Filed 10-23-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Eugene E. CHATMAN, Appellant v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA; RSI Property Management; Steven Baskin; Karen Baskin; James Butler; Judith Butler; David K. Rudov.

No. 07-1964.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Summary Action

Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 April 24, 2008.

Filed: May 22, 2008.

Eugene E. Chatman, Pittsburgh, PA, pro se.

Before: AMBRO, FUENTES and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Chatman, representing himself and proceeding *in forma pauperis,*filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The District Court dismissed it pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Chatman appealed, and we dismissed his appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), too. Chatman then petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, but his petition was denied.

Chatman recently returned to the District Court and filed a “motion for leave to file demand for jury trial.” Through his motion, Chatman was apparently trying to revive the claims he presented in his § 1983 complaint, although he also provided more specific information about how a state court allegedly wronged him by denying his demand for a jury trial. The District Court denied his motion. Chat-man appeals *in forma pauperis.*In his notice of appeal, he explains that he wanted a jury trial in state court and in his District Court case, and he states that the District Court erred in previously dismissing his complaint.

We have jurisdiction over Chatman’s appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. *See Isidor Paiewonsky Assocs., Inc. v. Sharp Properties, Inc.,*998 F.2d 145, 151 (3d Cir.1993). However, we must dismiss it under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) because it has no arguable basis in law or fact. *See Neitzke v. Williams,*490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). The District Court long ago dismissed Chatman’s complaint, we affirmed the order of dismissal, and the Supreme Court denied certiorari. Chatman was not entitled to a jury trial or other relief in his closed case.
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home
 News Articles
 Press Releases
 Press Releases
 June 7, 2024

FMC Seeks Public Comments on New Maersk & Hapag-Lloyd Cooperative Agreement

The Federal Maritime Commission has opened a 12-day comment period allowing interested members of the public to respond to Maersk and Hapag Lloyd’s newly filed vessel sharing agreement, the Gemini Cooperation Agreement. Instructions for submitting...

Categories:News Articles,Press Releases,VOCCMay 13, 2024

Final Rule on Demurrage & Detention Cleared to Take Full Effect May 28

Recent actions taken by the Office of the Management and Budget (OMB) and the Federal Maritime Commission clear the way for the final rule on Demurrage and Detention Billing Practices to take full effect on...

Categories:News Articles,Press ReleasesNewer Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Felipe AGUILERA-VALENZUELA, also known as Felipe Francisco Aguil-era-Valenzuela, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40255

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*369Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Felipe Aguilera-Valenzuela has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Aguilera-Valenzuela has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### MAI YANG, Petitioner v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-3275.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 2008.

Filed: May 27, 2008.

Mary Elizabeth Baquero, Baquero Law Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Petitioner.

Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Virginia Lum, Karen Drummond, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Scott Baniecke, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Bloomington, MN, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Mai Yang, a native and citizen of Laos, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings to apply for asylum on account of her Hmong ethnicity and Christian beliefs.1 We deny the petition.

We conclude the BIA acted within its discretion in denying Yang’s motion to reopen. *See Kanyi v. Gonzales,*406 F.3d *7111087, 1089 (8th Cir.2005) (review standard). Yang did not present evidence that conditions in Laos had changed since her removal hearing so that she now had, but did not previously have, reason to fear persecution in Laos on account of her Hmong ethnicity and her Christian faith. *See Zheng v. Mukasey,*509 F.3d 869, 871-72 (8th Cir.2007) (asylum application filed after entry of final order of removal must be filed in conjunction with motion to reopen, and alien must meet more restrictive changed-country-conditions requirement; distinction between changed country conditions and changed personal conditions is sensible after final order of removal has been entered, since alien can manipulate latter but not former).

Yang’s newly raised argument that her case should be reopened to allow her to apply for withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture relief on account of her extra-marital pregnancy is not reviewable, because she did not move for reopening below on this basis, and thus she has not exhausted administrative remedies. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (alien must exhaust all available administrative remedies); *Ixtlilco-Morales v. Keisler,*507 F.3d 651, 656 (8th Cir.2007) (appeals court lacks jurisdiction to review issue not presented to BIA).

Accordingly, we deny the petition.

1

. The BIA also denied Yang’s motion for reconsideration of an earlier denial of adjustment of status based on Yang's marriage to a United States citizen. We do not address the adjustment claim, however, because Yang stated in her brief before us that her adjustment claim was moot as she filed for divorce from her spouse.
#### Cecil CLAYTON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. George LOMBARDI; David R. Dormire; Terry Russell; Richard Williams, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-1508.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 16, 2015.

Filed: March 17, 2015.

Elizabeth Unger Carlyle, Susan M. Hunt, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Stephen D. Hawke, Michael J. Spillane, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, MO (Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., on the brief), for appellees.

Before LOKEN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Cecil Clayton moves for stay of his execution scheduled for March 17, 2015, at 6:00 p.m., pending full briefing and argument of his appeal from the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting that he was incompetent to be executed. The district court dismissed *without prejudice*Clayton’s complaint for failure to utilize available state remedies, specifically Missouri Supreme Court Rule 91.

Clayton argues, among other things, that he is likely to succeed on the merits of his appeal of the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice2 for failure to utilize available state *900remedies. *See*Motion for Stay at 19. We disagree. The district court’s order was in accordance with our prior directives in the *Middleton*line of cases. *See Middleton v. Roper,*759 F.3d 833 (8th Cir.2014) *(“Middleton I*”); *Middleton v. Roper,*759 F.3d 867 (8th Cir.2014) *(“Middleton II*”). As a result, Clayton is not likely to prevail on the merits of his appeal of the district court’s order.

Accordingly, we deny Clayton’s motion for stay of execution pending appeal.

1

. The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

2

. On March 13, 2015, Clayton filed another § 1983 complaint in the Eastern District of Missouri after having filed in the Missouri Supreme Court a petition for writ of habeas corpus under Missouri Supreme Court Rule *90091, which the Missouri Supreme Court denied on March 14, 2015.
exv10w33



 





Exhibit 10.33




REVOLVING PROMISSORY NOTE




			
	Omaha, Nebraska

Note Date: August 16, 2006
	 	$3,500,000.00

Maturity Date: July 5, 2007






     On or before July 5, 2007, Red Trail Energy, LLC (“BORROWER”), promises to pay to the order
of First National Bank of Omaha (“BANK”) at any of its offices in Omaha, Nebraska the principal
sum hereof, which shall be Three Million Five Hundred Thousand and no/100 ($3,500,000.00) Dollars
or so much thereof as may have been advanced by BANK and shown on the records of the BANK to be
outstanding, under this Note and the Construction Loan Agreement executed by the BANK and BORROWER
dated as of December 16, 2005, as it may, from time to time, be amended (the “LOAN AGREEMENT”).
Interest on the principal balance from time to time outstanding will be payable at a rate equal to
the LIBOR RATE plus three hundred forty (340) basis points from time to time until maturity, and
six hundred (600) basis points in excess of said aggregate interest rate from time to time after
maturity, whether by acceleration or otherwise. Interest shall be calculated on the basis of a
360-day year, counting the actual number of days elapsed. Interest on this NOTE shall be payable
quarterly, commencing November 16, 2006, and continuing on the same date of each third month
thereafter. Provided, however, the LOAN AGREEMENT contains provisions for reduction of the
interest rate under certain circumstances.



     This note is executed pursuant to the LOAN AGREEMENT. The LOAN AGREEMENT contains
additional terms of this Note, including, but not limited to enumerated events of default, and the
granting of liens to secure BORROWER’s performance. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined
herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the LOAN AGREEMENT.



     As provided in the LOAN AGREEMENT, upon any such enumerated default, BANK may accelerate the
due date of this Note and declare all obligations set forth herein immediately due and payable,
and BANK shall also have such other remedies as are described in the LOAN AGREEMENT and are
provided by law. All makers and endorsers hereby waive presentment, demand, protest and notice of
dishonor, consent to any number of extensions and renewals for any period without notice; and
consent to any substitution, exchange or release of collateral, and to the addition or releases of
any other party primarily or secondarily liable.



     Executed as of the Note Date set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 Red Trail Energy, LLC, a North Dakota limited

liability company	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Ambrose R. Hoff
 

	 	 
	 

	 	Name: Ambrose R. Hoff	 	 
	 

	 	Title: Chairman	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	And	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Mick J. Miller
 

	 	 
	 

	 	Name: Mick J. Miller	 	 
	 

	 	Title: CEO
#### Kamal PATEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mack BONNER; Abdur Rahim; Bureau of Prisons, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-6310.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 19, 2011.

Decided: April 11, 2011.

Kamal Patel, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Huband, Bureau of Prisons, Butner, North Carolina, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kamal Patel appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Patel v. Bonner,*No. 5:08-ct-03110-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2010). We deny the motion to supplement the record and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
# /753-Z3 ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 14-12-01099-CR OFFENSE: Credit Card Abuse STYLE: Dustin Zacharv Cole v The State ofTexas COUNTY: Harris COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed as Reformed TRIAL COURT: 351st District Court 

### DATE: 11/14/2013 Publish:No TC CASE #: 1321571



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

### STYLE: Dustin Zacharv Cole vThe State ofTexas CCAtt. 

# nsi'/s Stai-dS Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: ^F>r!) /£ Q.&M JUDGE: f^C? CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE:. SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3579 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in the 

amount of the reporting fees payable to educational institutions that 

enroll veterans receiving educational assistance from the Department 

of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an 

increase in the amount of the reporting fees payable 

to educational institutions that enroll veterans receiving 

educational assistance from the Department of Veterans 

Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3579 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF REPORTING FEE 

2 PAYABLE TO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS 

3 THAT ENROLL VETERANS RECEIVING EDU4 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE. 

5 (a) INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF FEE.—Subsection (c) 

6 of section 3684 of title 38, United States Code, is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘$7’’ and inserting ‘‘$50’’; and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘$11’’ and inserting ‘‘$50’’. 

10 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Subsection (a) of 

11 such section is amended by striking the second comma 

12 after ‘‘34’’. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 subsections (a) and (b) shall take effect on the date that 

15 is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Oliver Creek Resources Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the year ending January 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce
Thomson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
30th day of April, 2007.


/s/ Bruce Thomson
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form
  10-Q of EWRX Internet Systems for the quarter ending March 31, 2010, I,
  Jessica Q. Wang, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
  EWRX Internet Systems hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
  adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
  of my knowledge and belief, that:

|1. | Such quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ending
        March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in such quarterly report of
        Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2010, fairly represents
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of EWRX Internet Systems.

Date: August 16, 2010

EWRX Internet Systems

By:    /s/ Jessica Q. Wang
         Jessica Q. Wang
         Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer

---