alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2006,                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended December 31, 2006, fairly represents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of Voiceserve,                Inc. |

| Date:                March 30, 2007                                                                                        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                       |
| Voiceserve,                Inc.                                                                                            |
|                                                                                                                       |
| By:                /s/                Aron Sandler             |
| Aron                SandlerChief                Financial Officer                                                          |
----

----

| (1)    | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended      December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

| Dated:  March      1, 2010 | /s/ William J.      Fehrman                |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 | William      J. Fehrman                    |   |
|                                 | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                 | (principal      executive officer)         |   |

----

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Sutton, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 78]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted following a jury trial of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20) and petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25) arising out of the burglary of an appliance store. In the early morning hours, before the store was opened, a resident of an apartment above the store observed a person leaving a side door carrying a microwave oven. The witness testified that he saw that person several times later in the day wearing the same clothes and identified defendant as that person. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), we conclude that the evidence is sufficient as a matter of law *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). Nor is there any merit to the contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley, supra,*at 495). Defendant’s reliance on a jury note asking if “a *1073suspect [could] be considered guilty of burglary as a result of receiving stolen property just outside the building from someone within” is misplaced. There is no evidence to suggest that there was another individual present at the crime scene.

Defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial by various instances of prosecutorial misconduct. The conduct of the prosecutor in addressing members of the jury by name did not deny defendant due process of law *(see, People v Rubin,*101 AD2d 71, 77; *cf., People v Creasy,*236 NY 205, 226). Although the prosecutor should not have vouched for the credibility of the eyewitness, County Court’s curative instruction that it was the function of the jury “to determine the credibility of any witness and the weight to be accorded to that witness’s testimony” negated any potential prejudice to defendant *(see, People v Moore,*242 AD2d 882). We have considered the remaining contentions of defendant and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Brandt, J.—Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Perez, Appellant.

[665 NYS2d 647]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Donati, J.), rendered February 15, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant has not preserved his claim that his right to a public trial was violated by the security measures employed by the court, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that the undercover officer’s concerns for his safety, notwithstanding his geographical reassignment, were sufficiently particularized to warrant the court’s use of the screening procedure suggested by defendant as an alternative to closure. The screening of potential spectators was a traffic control device, not a closure of the courtroom *(see, People v Colon,*71 NY2d 410, 417, *cert denied*487 US 1239; *People v Glover,*60 NY2d 783, 785, *cert denied*466 US 975; *see also, People v Rivera,*237 AD2d 178, *lv denied*90 NY2d 863). Defendant’s argument, raised for the first time on appeal, that the presence of a checkpoint had an intimidating effect upon potential spectators rests entirely on speculation. We note that, in any event, there is no indication that anyone was denied entry *(see, United States v Brazel,*102 F3d 1120, 1155-1156, *cert denied*— US —, 118 S Ct 79).

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s advance ruling concerning some circumstances under which defendant might open the door to his impeachment by means of a pending charge became moot when defendant testified and the People refrained from eliciting anything about the pending charge or its underlying facts. Defendant’s claim that the court’s advance ruling impaired his strategy is unpreserved *(People v Padro,*75 NY2d 820) and, in any event, conclusory. The court’s advance ruling was in accordance with *People v Betts*(70 NY2d 289, 295).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and *72find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Williams and Andrias, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3391-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Puerto Rico; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-3391-EM), dated September 18, 
2017, and related determinations.

DATES: The change occurred on October 10, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Michael F. 
Byrne, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this emergency.
    This action terminates the appointment of Alejandro DeLaCampa as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-23245 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 10

- 00301

- CR

JOHN HENRY LLOYD

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009

- 1651

- C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

John Henry Lloyd pled guilty to robbery as a habitual offender and was

sentenced to thirty years in prison. See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN . §§ 29.02; 12.42 (Vernon

2003 & Supp. 2010 ). Almost six months after his conviction, Lloyd attempts to appeal.

By letter dated August 24, 2010, the Cl erk of this Court notified Lloyd that his appeal

was subject to dismissal because the notice of appeal was untimely and because the

certification of defendant’s right of appeal indicated that he had no right to appeal and

waived his appeal. Lloyd was warn ed that the Court would dismiss the appeal unless aLloyd v. State Page 2

response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Lloyd filed a response

but it fails to show grounds for continuing the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3; 44.3.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed September 22 , 2010

Do not publish

[CRPM]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TERRANCE JONES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 288 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of December, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140505

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140505 COA: 292679 Wayne CC: 01-000239 ELIJAH JAMES COOK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 28, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: | March 4, 2011 |   |   |   |                                                 |
|--------|---------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |          | By:    | /s/    |   | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |          |   | Name:  |   | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |          |   | Title: |   | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |          |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |          |   |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | March 4, 2011 |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |          | By:    | /s/    |   | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |          |   | Name:  |   | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |          |   | Title: |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |          |   |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)         |
|   |          |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |          |   |   |   |                                                 |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos BARTOLON-LOPEZ, a.k.a. Anthony Felix-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10449.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 19, 2013.*

Filed Dec. 4, 2013.

Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Nathan Donlon Leonardo, Leonardo Law Offices, PLLC, TUCSON, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

CARLOS BARTOLON-LOPEZ, pro se.

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Carlos Bartolon-Lopez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 77-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326; and the revocation of supervised release and concurrent eight-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to *Anders, v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Bartolon-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Bartolon-Lopez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49200-49201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Performance Review Board Membership

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of the PRBs is to provide fair and impartial 
review of the annual SES performance appraisal prepared by the senior 
executive's immediate and second level supervisor; to make 
recommendations to appointing officials regarding acceptance or 
modification of the performance rating; and to make recommendations for 
performance bonuses and basic pay increases. Composition of the 
specific PRBs will be determined on an ad hoc basis from among the 
individuals listed below:

Mr. Mark Andress

[[Page 49201]]

Mr. Todd Balazs
Ms. Jennifer Balisle
VADM Terry Benedict
Ms. Juliette Beyler
RADM Bon Boxall
Mrs. Diane Boyle
Mr. William Bray
Ms. Anne Brennan
Mr. Steven Cade
Mr. Phillip Chudoba
Mr. Anthony Cifone
RDML Brian Corey
Dr. Bruce Danly
RADM Mark Darrah
Mr. Tom Dee
RDML Moises DelToro, III
Mr. Frank DiGiovanni
RDML James Downey
Mr. Victor Gavin
CAPT John Gearhart
Ms. Donjette Gilmore
Dr. Frank Herr
Mr. Neil Hogg
Mr. Robert Hogue
Mr. Mark Honecker
Mr. Steven Iselin
VADM David Johnson
Ms. Joan Johnson
Ms. Joan Johnson
Dr. Walter Jones
Ms. Jennifer LaTorre
Mr. Paul Lluy
Mr. Joe Ludovici
Mr. Michael Madden
Dr. Michael Malanoski
BGen Greg Masiello
Mr. Donald McCormack, Jr.
Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott
Mr. James Meade
Mr. William Melton
RADM Michael Moran
CAPT Scott Moran
Mr. Garry Newton
RDML Dean Peters
Mr. Garrett Ressing
LtGen Michael Rocco
Dr. Stephen Russell
Mr. Steven Schulze
RDML Robert Sharp
Ms. Cindy Shaver
Mr. James Smerchansky
Ms. Allison Stiller
Mr. Patrick Sullivan
Ms. Leslie Taylor
Ms. Mary K. Tompa
Mr. Stephen Trautman
Ms. Gloria Valdez
Dr. David Walker
RDML Stephen Williamson
Mr. William Williford
Mr. Robert Woods
Mr. Samuel Worth
Ms. Lynn Wright
RDML Michael Zarkowski

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie Joseph, Director, Executive 
Management Program Office, Office of Civilian Human Resources at 202-
685-6186.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The appointment of members to the DON's 
numerous Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Boards 
(PRBs), is being made pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

    Dated: October 17, 2017.
A.M. Nichols,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-23012 Filed 10-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MARCH 3, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-12286

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 97-00582-CR-JAL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE I. MACIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(March 3, 2009)

Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On April 7, 1999, the district court entered a judgment convicting and
sentencing appellant for various offenses not pertinent here. He appealed the

judgment, challenging both his convictions and sentences. We affirmed. United

States v. DeLeon, No. 99-10274 (11 Cir. 2002) (not published).

th

On October 19, 2007, appellant, proceeding pro se, moved the district court

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) to set aside the April 7, 1999

judgment. On November 27, 2007, the court denied his motion. On January 28,

2008, appellant moved the court for reconsideration. The court denied the motion

on April 8, 2008. On April 8, 2008, he appealed the court’s ruling.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s Rule 60(b) motion. That rule applies in

civil cases, not in criminal cases such as the case here.

AFFIRMED.

2
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert H. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer (and interim principal executive
officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




April 19, 2006                         /s/ Robert H. Nelson
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert H. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer
                                       (and interim principal executive officer)




     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered
filed as part of the Report.
December 22, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

AGAR CORPORATION, IN C. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00134

- CV V.

ELECTRO CIRCUITS INT ERNA TIONAL, LLC AND SUR ESH PARIKH
, Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed January 20, 2015, was heard on the transcript of t he record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.