alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 31, 2014

Augusta Resource Corporation

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: Augusta Resource
Corporation

I, John I. Ajie, do hereby
consent to (i) the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical
report entitled Rosemont Copper Project NI 43-101 Technical Report Updated
Feasibility Study, Pima County, Arizona, USA, dated August 28, 2012 in the Form
40-F Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2013, and any amendments
thereto (the Form 40-F), of Augusta Resource Corporation (the Company),
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and in the
Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the
AIF) and (ii) the incorporation by reference of such disclosure in the
Companys Form S-8 Registration Statement being filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission (the S-8).

I also consent to the use of my name
in the Form 40-F, and any amendments thereto, and in the AIF and to the
incorporation by reference of the Form 40-F and any amendments thereto, and the
AIF into the S-8 and into the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of the Company
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (No. 333-157887,
No. 333-163161, and No. 333-173297).

| | By: | /s/
      John I. Ajie       
| | --- | -----------------------------
| |     | John I. Ajie                 
| |     | Vice President of Engineering
| |     | URS                          
| |     | Denver, Colorado,
    USA    

---
Exhibit 10.1

                  Executive Officer Equity Compensation Summary
                  ---------------------------------------------

                                     Restricted Stock*
                                       (TimeVesting)              Stock Options*
  Executive Officer                         (#)                         (#)

Charles H. Turner                         12,000                       60,000
  Executive Vice President,
  Finance, Chief Financial
  Officer and Treasurer


Jay R. Jacobs                             12,000                       60,000
  Executive Vice President,
  Merchandising


Phil E. Schneider                         12,000                      60,000
  Executive Vice President,
  Marketing


David A. Walker                           12,000                       60,000
  Executive Vice President,
  Planning and Allocations



*All equity awards were granted under the Pier 1 Imports, Inc. 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan. The grants were effective April 13, 2007 at an exercise price of
$7.77, which was the NYSE closing price on Friday, April 13, 2007 of the
Company's common stock.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3544 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide guidelines for the establishment of new national cemeteries by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2009 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide guidelines 

for the establishment of new national cemeteries by the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Cemeteries 

5 Expansion Act of 2009’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3544 IH

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW NATIONAL CEMETERIES 

2 BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

3 Section 2404 of title 38, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following new sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(h)(1) In selecting a location for the establishment 

7 of a new national cemetery under this chapter, the Sec8 retary shall give priority to a location where at least 

9 110,000 veterans reside within a 75-mile radius of the lo10 cation. 

11 ‘‘(2) In conducting an annual performance measure 

12 of the percentage of veterans who are served by any ceme13 tery, the Secretary shall— 

14 ‘‘(A) use census tracts, rather than counties, as 

15 the primary geographic unit to test and identify po16 tential locations for new national cemeteries and to 

17 determine the percentage of veterans served; 

18 ‘‘(B) use methods to avoid the double counting 

19 of veterans in overlapping service areas; and 

20 ‘‘(C) count veterans who reside in counties bi21 sected by a service area using a proportional overlay 

22 method.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, FOR DIGS, INC.  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                    1,029,171
<SECURITIES>                                  1,250
<RECEIVABLES>                               100,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,130,717
<PP&E>                                      283,130
<DEPRECIATION>                               74,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,603,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        86,327
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                      25
<COMMON>                                      6,659
<OTHER-SE>                                1,510,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              1,517,472
<SALES>                                     426,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            470,016
<CGS>                                       156,315
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             1,071,484
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              3,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (761,511)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  2,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (763,911)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (879,536)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0


</TABLE>
#### SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INDIGENOUS GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant, and Deni G. Leonard, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-17116.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 23, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2010.

Marc J. Fagel, Esquire, Robert L. Mitchell, Esquire, Erin E. Schneider, Se*251curities & Exchange Commission, San Francisco, CA, Dominick V. Freda, Esquire, Senior Counsel, Securities & Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellee.

No Appearance, for Defendant.

Deni G. Leonard, San Francisco, CA, pro se.

Before: SKOPIL, FARRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *251*See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Deni Leonard appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in this civil enforcement action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), alleging Leonard violated various federal securities laws. He does not, however, directly challenge the violations or the sanctions imposed. Rather, he contends the SEC engaged in discrimination and misconduct that requires reversal and remand for trial. We reject that contention and affirm.

Leonard’s claims of racial discrimination fail because they are vague, conclusory and without factual support. Accordingly, they are “not entitled to an assumption of truth.” *See Moss v. U.S. Secret Service,*572 F.3d 962, 970 (9th Cir.2009) (noting allegations of systematic discrimination by government officials without any factual content are conclusory and inadequate). His contention that he was wrongfully advised not to hire an attorney fails because there is no evidence that such a reeom-mendation was made other than in an unrelated proceeding.

We also reject Leonard’s claims of discovery abuse. First, parties are required only to produce documents for inspection and are not obligated to produce copies. *See Trevino v. Gates,*99 F.3d 911, 921 n. 4 (9th Cir.1996). Second, the SEC attorneys properly construed Leonard’s list of questions as interrogatories and duly responded to each question pursuant to Federal Rule Civil Rule 33(b).

Finally, we reject Leonard’s “jurisdictional question” related to the SEC’s authority to obtain documents from a non-party tribal company. Leonard has not demonstrated that the government’s investigative powers do not extend to tribal entities. *See EEOC v. Karuk Tribe Housing Authority,*260 F.3d 1071, 1075 (9th Cir.2001) (“Indian tribes do not ... enjoy sovereign immunity from suits brought by the federal government.”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2006,                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended December 31, 2006, fairly represents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of HSM                Holdings, Inc. |

| Date:                April 10, 2007                                                                   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                  |
| HSM                Holdings, Inc.                                                                     |
|                                                                                                  |
| By:                /s/                Simone Crighton         |
| Simone                CrightonChief                Financial Officer                                  |
#### Town of Hempstead, Respondent, v Martin Davis, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 440]

—In an action for a permanent injunction prohibiting the defendant from storing certain junked motor vehicles and machinery on his property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated June 21, 1996, which (1) denied his motion to stay enforcement of an order of the same court, entered February 16, 1996, and (2) granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to enter and clean up the defendant’s premises.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It was not an improper delegation of authority for the court to direct the Fire Commissioners of the Hewlett Bay Fire District to remove material which constituted a violation of an order awarding the plaintiff a preliminary injunction, since there were specific standards provided in that order to guide the Fire Commissioners’ actions *(see generally, City of Amsterdam v Helsby,*37 NY2d 19).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




Solectron Corporation



Remuneration for the CEO Search Committee of the Board of Directors



On March 6, 2007, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Solectron Corporation (the “Company”)
approved the following compensation for the members of the Board’s CEO Search Committee:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Dr. Paul R. Low (Chairman)
	 	$	20,000	 
	Heinz Fridrich
	 	$	11,000	 
	William A. Hasler
	 	$	11,000	 
	C. Wesley M. Scott
	 	$	11,000	 





These amounts are in addition to other remuneration and fees these directors are entitled to
receive as described in the Proxy Statement of the Company filed on December 4, 2006.
#### Dennis MEEHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NEW YORK, N.Y. State Dept. of Correctional Services, Corcraft Industries, et al., Defendants-Appellees.*

No. 09-4973-pr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 27, 2011.

Dennis Meehan, Fallsburg, NY, pro se.

Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, Nancy A. Spiegel, Senior Assistant Solicitor General, Victor Paladino, Assistant Solicitor General, for Eric T. Schneider-man, Attorney General, Albany, NY, for Appellees.

PRESENT: AMALYA L. KEARSE, GERARD E. LYNCH, J. CLIFFORD WALLACE,** Circuit Judges.

*

 The Clerk of Court is instructed to amend the official caption in this case to conform to the listing of the parties above.

**

 Senior Judge J. Clifford Wallace of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

Dennis Meehan, pro *se,*appeals from the district court’s dismissal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), of his complaint against the State of New York, the New York State Department of Correctional Services, and Corcraft Industries, and its summary judgment for the remaining defendants. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the relevant facts and procedural history.

We review a district court’s 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) dismissal *de novo. See Giano v. Goord,*250 F.3d 146, 149-50 (2d Cir.2001). We also review a summary judgment *de novo,*resolving all ambiguities and drawing all permissible inferences in favor of the non-moving party. *See Redd v. Wright,*597 F.3d 532, 535 (2d Cir.2010).

Having conducted an independent and *de novo*review of the record, we affirm the *70district court’s orders for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned decisions. With respect to the October 11, 2006, order, although Meehan was not given the opportunity to amend his complaint prior to dismissal, *see McEachin v. McGuinnis,*357 F.3d 197, 200 (2d Cir. 2004), such amendment would have been futile because Coreraft Industries is immune from his claims, *see Komlosi v. N.Y. State Office of Mental Retardation and Dev. Disabilities,*64 F.3d 810, 815 (2d Cir.1995) (sovereign immunity applies to “governmental entities that are considered arms of the state for Eleventh Amendment purposes” (quotation marks omitted)). With respect to the September 29, 2009, order, Meehan failed to exhaust all available administrative remedies before bringing his federal suit, *see*42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), and has not shown any special circumstances that would justify this failure, *see Brownell v. Krom,*446 F.3d 305, 311-12 (2d Cir.2006).

We have considered Appellant’s other arguments on appeal and conclude that they are without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         359,727
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    114,492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               660,240
<PP&E>                                         325,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                 156,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,711,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,973,962
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    68,687,839
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,519,289)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,512,420
<SALES>                                          8,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,836
<CGS>                                           64,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,534,829
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (76,623)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (28,668,082)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 50,898
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (28,617,184)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angelo Guerrero, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 866]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J.—Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Quest Oil Corporation, a Nevada
      corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the year ended June 30, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Joseph F. Wallen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







/s/
                Joseph F. Wallen
              Joseph
                F. Wallen
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              
              August
                21, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the NHLBI Special Emphasis Panel.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; NHLBI Single Site CLTR Review.                    

*Date:*                         November 6, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Chang Sook Kim, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7188, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-827-7940,                         *carolko@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 6, 2017.

 Michelle Trout, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-22141 Filed 10-12-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P