alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3562 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3562

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the federally occupied building located at 1220 Echelon 
Parkway in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ``James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, 
         Michael Schwerner, and Roy K. Moore Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BUILDING DESIGNATION.
    The Administrator of General Services shall ensure that the 
federally occupied building located at 1220 Echelon Parkway in Jackson, 
Mississippi, is known and designated as the ``James Chaney, Andrew 
Goodman, Michael Schwerner, and Roy K. Moore Federal Building''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
    With respect to the period in which the building referred to in 
section 1 is federally occupied, any reference in a law, map, 
regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to 
that building shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James Chaney, 
Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner, and Roy K. Moore Federal Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Delek Marketing & Supply, LP  First Amendment To Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
 Amendment , Borrower
 Preliminary Statements
 Credit Agreement
  Now, Therefore,
 Section Amendment to Credit Agreement
  Section 1.1. L/C Sublimit
 L/C Sublimit
 Section 1.2.
 First Amendment Effective Date
 Holdings
 Section 1.3.
 Section 5.7. Use of Proceeds; Margin Stock.




---



##### 



Section 1.4.
 Section 6.15. Dividends and Certain Other Restricted Payments;
Amendments of Material Contracts provided, however,
 -2-




---



##### 



provided provided
 Section 1.5.
 Total Leverage Ratio
 Section 1.6.
 Net Worth. plus i.e. i.e plus
 -3-




---



##### 



Section Conditions Precedent
      Section Representations and Warranties.
  Section 4. Collateral.
  -4-




---



##### 



Section Miscellaneous
    [Signature Pages to Follow]
 -5-




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof
 BorrowerDelek Marketing & Supply, LPBy:
    Delek Marketing GP, LLC,its general partnerBy
    /s/ Edward MorganName  Edward MorganTitle   Chief Financial OfficerBy
    /s/ Gregory A. IntemannName Gregory A. IntemannTitle   Treasurer




---



##### 



LendersFifth Third Bank, an Ohio banking
    corporation, as a Lender, as L/C
    Issuer, and as Administrative AgentBy
    /s/ Kirk JohnsonName Kirk JohnsonTitle   Vice President
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Soledad YBARRA, also known as Chole, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-2788.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 13, 2008.

Filed: May 6, 2008.

Christopher C. Myers, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fargo, ND, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William Kirschner, Kirschner Law Office, Fargo, ND, for Defendant-Appellant.

Soledad Ybarra, Pekin, IL, pro se.

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

In a second superceding indictment, Soledad Ybarra was charged with three counts: conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, cocaine, and marijuana in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); money laundering and conspiracy to conceal and disguise the nature, location, ownership, and control of proceeds of an unlawful activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); and conspiracy to unlawfully use communication facilities in *536violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 848(b), 843(d), and 846. Ybarra pled guilty to the second and third counts, and the government dismissed the first count. The district court1 sentenced Ybarra to 114 months of imprisonment on count two and a concurrent 48 months on count three. Ybarra appeals, arguing that the district court erred by sentencing her as a member of the drug conspiracy, erred in calculating her base offense level, and erred by denying her a minor role or minimal participant reduction.

We find Ybarra’s arguments to be without merit. The laundered funds came from the proceeds of the drug conspiracy, and the district court did not err in computing Ybarra’s laundering sentence based upon her membership in the drug conspiracy. *See*U.S.S.G. § 2Sl.l(a)(l) (stating the base offense level for money laundering is the offense level for the underlying offense if the defendant committed the underlying offense and the offense level for that offense can be determined). There was more than sufficient evidence that Ybarra was a member of the drug conspiracy and was accountable for the amount of drugs that the district court determined. The district court did not clearly err in denying her a mitigating role reduction as the district court determined she lacked credibility in denying involvement in the drug conspiracy and money laundering.

We affirm the sentence imposed by the district court in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule of Appellate Procedure 47B.

1

. The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota.
Exhibit 99.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royster-Clark, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Francis P. Jenkins, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    FRANCIS P. JENKINS, JR.Francis P. Jenkins, Jr. Chief Executive Officer








May 13, 2003
#### In the Matter of Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Respondent, v Dominic Mancuso, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 460]

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an underinsured motorist claim, Dominic Mancuso appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated November 12, 1996, which granted the petition and denied, as academic, his cross motion, *inter alia,*to direct the petitioner to settle the action entitled *Mancuso v Charbonneau,*Index No. 1134/95, pending in the Supreme Court, Rockland County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that Dominic Mancuso’s claim for underinsured motorist benefits coverage was untimely *(see, Schiebel v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.,*166 AD2d 520; *Matter of Merchants Mut. Ins. Co. v Hurban,*160 AD2d 873; *cf., Matter of Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v Edgerson,*195 AD2d 560). Accordingly, the court properly granted the petition and denied the cross motion as academic. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Lynch  Interactive
Corporation  (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert
E. Dolan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Robert E. Dolan
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 16, 2005



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 12/31/99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,634
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,799
<PP&E>                                           1,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,784
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              107
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,287
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,305
<SALES>                                          1,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,992
<CGS>                                            1,256
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,159
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,193)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)


</TABLE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 D0 18 7 . ANGELO MOE v . LAKE ST. J AMES APARTMENTS.

L a ke S t. Ja m e s A

pa r t m e nts c om

m e nc e d disp os s es so r

y pr oc e e dings a ga inst M oe

An g el o

. On No v em

b er 15

, 2 0 1 9

, t h e m ag i s t rat e co u rt en t ered d efau l t j u d gm en t in

fav o r o f Lak e St

. J am es Ap art m en t s . An g el o fi l ed t h i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

ap p eal s eek i ng t o ch al l en g e t h e m ag i s t rat e co u rt ’ s ru l i n g . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. As a g en eral ru l e, “ [t ] h e o n l y av en u e o f ap p eal av ai l ab l e fro m [a] m a g i s t rat e

co u rt ju d g m en t i s p ro v i d ed b y OCGA § 1 5 -1 0 -4 1 (b ) (1 ), w hi ch al l o w s fo r a d e n o v o

ap p eal t o t h e s t at e o r su p eri or co u rt .” Ha nd l er v. Hu l s ey , 1 9 9 Ga. Ap p

. 7 51

, 7 5 1 (4 0 6

SE2 d 2 2 5 ) (1 9 91 ). If a p art y is th en ag g ri ev ed b y th e d eci s i on o f t h e st at e o r s u p eri o r

co u rt

, an ap p l i cat io n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal m ay b e fi l ed in t hi s Co urt

. See OCGA

§ 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ), (1 1 ). Ho wev er, t h i s Co u rt m ay o n l y ad d res s m ag i s t rat e co u rt m at t ers

t h at al read y h av e b een rev i ewed b y t h e s t at e o r s u peri o r co u rt

. See W es t wi n d Co r

p.

v. W a sh i ng t o n Fed

. S & L As sn

. , 1 9 5 Ga. Ap p

. 4 1 1

, 4 11 (1 ) (3 9 3 SE2 d 4 7 9 ) (1 9 9 0 ).

Fo r t h is reas o n , w e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s id er t h i s ap p l icat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. December 19, 2019

12/19/2019
#### Emmanuel DJOKOU, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-1864.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 11, 2011.

Decided: April 19, 2011.

*314Anna Marie Gallagher, Maggio & Kat-tar, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Anthony W. Norwood, Senior Litigation Counsel, Corey L. Farrell, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Emmanuel Djokou, a native and citizen of Cameroon, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his untimely and numerically-barred motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and Djokou’s contentions and find that we lack jurisdiction to review his claims. *See Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400-01*(4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 137, 175 L.Ed.2d 90 (2009). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. *See In re: Djokou*(B.I.A. July 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DISMISSED.*
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23292]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL18-13-000]


Transource Kansas, LLC; Notice of Institution of Section 206 
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On October 19, 2017, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
EL18-13-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether the 
formula rate protocols of Transource Kansas, LLC may be unjust, 
unreasonable, unduly discriminatory or preferential. Transource Kansas, 
LLC, 161 FERC 61,050 (2017).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL18-13-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL18-13-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 
days of the date of issuance of the order.

    Dated: October 19, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-23292 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 10.18

                              GRID PROMISSORY NOTE

                                                        CDN   $200,000
                                                        Date: February 21, 2003

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, IMAGIS TECHNOLOGIES INC. (the "Borrower") promises to pay to
ALTAF  NAZERALI (the  "Lender") at 1300 - 1075 West Georgia  Street,  Vancouver,
B.C. V6E 3C9 or at such other place as the Lender may  designate in writing from
time to time,  the principal sum of $200,000 or so much of said sum as will have
been advanced and is then outstanding  under this Note as evidenced by notations
by the Lender on the grid note  attached  hereto as Exhibit A, and  interest  on
such outstanding principal sum at a floating rate of interest equal at all times
to the Prime Rate plus 2% per annum calculated monthly, not in advance.

In this Note, "Prime Rate" means the floating rate of interest  established from
time to time by Royal Bank of Canada as a reference date for  determining  rates
of interest  charged by it on  Canadian  dollar  commercial  loans made by it in
Canada.

Time is of the essence hereof.

This Note will be payable in lawful money of Canada.

This Note,  made in the  Province of British  Columbia,  will be governed by and
construed in  accordance  with the laws of the Province of British  Columbia and
the laws of Canada applicable therein.

This Note is issued  pursuant to a letter loan agreement dated February 21, 2003
between the  Borrower and the Lender (the "Loan  Agreement").  In the event of a
conflict  between this Note and the Loan  agreement the terms of this Note shall
prevail.

IMAGIS TECHNOLOGIES INC.


By:   Signed " Wayne Smith"
   --------------------------------
      Wayne Smith
      Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>


                                    EXHIBIT A
                                    ---------

                                    GRID NOTE
                                    ---------

                              ADVANCES AND PAYMENTS

================================================================================
    DATE                     AMOUNT OF                   UNPAID
              AMOUNT OF      PRINCIPAL       INTEREST   PRINCIPAL     NOTATION
               ADVANCE        REPAID           PAID      BALANCE       MADE BY
================================================================================

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ameen ABDUL-JILLIL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-35367.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 24, 2011.

Stephan Alexander Collins, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Richard L. Pomeroy, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Meredith Appel Ahearn, Hagans, Ah-earn & Webb, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Ameen Abdul-Jillil appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Abdul-Jillil contends that his reliance on counsel’s misleading advice regarding the *758potential sentence rendered his guilty pleas invalid. Irrespective of counsel’s advice, Abdul-Jillil was adequately informed, by both the plea agreement and the judge, that he might be sentenced to more than 135 months. Additionally, Abdul-Jillil orally confirmed to the court that he understood the terms and maximum sentence stated in the plea agreement before he entered his guilty pleas. Accordingly, Abdul-Jillil has failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by counsel’s performance. *See Hill v. Lockhart,*474 U.S. 52, 57-59, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985) (applying *Strickland*two-part test to guilty pleas); *see also Womack v. Del Papa,*497 F.3d 998, 1003-04 (9th Cir.2007).

Abdul-Jillil’s motion to file late excerpts of record and for relief from default is granted.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Novori Inc. - Exhibit 10.2






Addendum 

THIS ADDENDUM (“Addendum”) effective as of April 4, 2007


BETWEEN 

(1) Novori Inc.
(“Company”)
(2) 689719 BC Ltd. (“Lender”) 

WHEREAS:

	(A) 	
      The parties entered into a binding 5% Convertible
      Promissory Note on July 5, 2005.

	 	 
	(B) 	
      The parties wish to change the term of the conversion
      price.



THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that the parties have agreed
that: 

	1. 	
      Paragraph 6.5 is amended so that it will be read as
      follows:



“The price at which shares of Common
Stock shall be delivered upon conversion (herein called the Conversion Price)
shall be $0.10 per share of Common Stock.” 

	2. 	
      The parties acknowledge that a dividend was issued on
      February 9, 2007 and another dividend was issued on March 29, 2007, and no
      further adjustment of the conversion price will be made pursuant to these
      dividend issuances.

	 	 
	3. 	
      All other provisions in the 5% Convertible Promissory
      Note shall remain in full force and effect.

	 	 
	4. 	
      This Addendum shall ensure to the benefit of and be
      binding upon my heirs, executors, administrators, successors and
      assigns.

	 	 
	5. 	
      This Addendum may be signed in counterpart and all
      counterparts taken together shall constitute one and the same Addendum,
      and any facsimile signature shall be taken as an
  original.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Addendum has been executed by
the parties to it, the day, month and year first written. 

Novori Inc. 

	/s/ Harold
      Schaffrick 	 
	Per: Harold Schaffrick 	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer 	 
	  	 
	689719 BC Ltd. 	 
	  	 
	  	 
	  	 
	  	 
	/s/ Mikhail
      Ratchkovski 	 
	Per: Mikhail Ratchkovski 	 
	President, Chief Executive 	 
	Officer and Chief Financial 	 
	Officer