alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3353 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3353

  To provide for American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern 
Marianas to be treated as States for certain criminal justice programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2009

 Mr. Sablan (for himself, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mrs. Christensen, and Ms. 
  Bordallo) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern 
Marianas to be treated as States for certain criminal justice programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT AS A STATE FOR AMERICAN SAMOA AND CNMI.

    Section 901(a)(2) of Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 
1968 (42 U.S.C. 3791(a)(2)) is amended by striking ``Islands:'' and all 
that follows through the period and inserting ``Islands;''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon Alfredo GARCIA-CORDOVA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50520.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 5, 2008.

U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Darla J. Mondou, Esq., Maraña, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ramon Alfredo Garcia-Cordova appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Garcia-Cordova’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We dismiss the appeal in light of the valid appeal waiver. *See United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge AGUILAR-VALLEJO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-10518.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 28, 2010.

Grant Fondo, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Jose, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*185Daniel Olmos, Nolan, Armstrong & Barton, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Aguilar-Vallejo appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss.

Aguilar-Vallejo contends that the district court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss the indictment. When Aguilar-Vallejo entered an unconditional guilty plea, however, he waived the right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss. *See Tollett v. Henderson,*411 U.S. 258, 267, 93 S.Ct. 1602, 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973). We therefore do not address the merits of Aguilar-Vallejo’s motion to dismiss. *See United States v. Lopez-Armenta,*400 F.3d 1173, 1175 (9th Cir.2005).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### LISA BREDEFELD *v.*BRISTOL HOSPITAL, INC.

(AC 33069)

Lavine, Alvord and Pellegrino, Js.

Argued January 9

officially released January 24, 2012

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Lorenzo SAUCEDO-ROMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10699

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 21, 2011.

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, Vicki Lamberson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Amarillo, TX, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.

Kevin Joel Page, Jason Douglas Hawkins, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, Thomas W. Kendrick, Law Office of Thomas W. Kendrick, Amarillo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Lorenzo Saucedo-Roman appeals the 37-month within-guidelines sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry into the United States following deportation. Saucedo-Roman contends that his sentence is substantively unrea*405sonable because it gives too much weight to his stale drug trafficking conviction and not enough weight to his rehabilitation. In support of his argument, he cites to extra-circuit law and a proposed 2011 amendment to the Guidelines. He also argues that his sentence is unfair because immigration defendants in the Northern District of Texas receive longer terms of imprisonment and fewer below-guidelines sentences than similarly-situated defendants across the nation.

Saucedo-Roman concedes that, because he challenges the substantive reasonableness of his sentence for the first time on appeal, that issue should, pursuant to our precedent, be reviewed for plain error. *See United States v. Peltier,*505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir.2007). Under the plain error standard, Saucedo-Roman must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that affects his substantial rights. *See Puckett v. United States,*556 U.S. 129, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 1429, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009). If he satisfies the first three elements of the plain error standard, this court has the discretion to correct the error if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. *See id.*

“A discretionary sentence imposed within a properly calculated guidelines range is presumptively reasonable.” *United States v. Campos-Maldonado,*531 F.3d 337, 338 (5th Cir.2008). Saucedo-Roman’s disagreement with the propriety of his sentence does not rebut the presumption of reasonableness. *See United States v. Gomez-Herrera,*523 F.3d 554, 565-66 (5th Cir.2008); *see also United States v. Will-ingham,*497 F.3d 541, 544-45 (5th Cir. 2007); *United States v. Rodarte-Vasquez,*488 F.3d 316, 322 (5th Cir.2007). As Sau-cedo-Roman has failed to demonstrate plain error in connection with his sentence, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. McCutcheon, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.



|                      |  |        |  |                                
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2009 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jeffrey A. McCutcheon      
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Jeffrey A. McCutcheon          
|                      |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief
|                      |  |        |  | Financial Officer              

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be retained by
LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL18-12-000]


ATX Southwest, LLC; Notice of Institution of Section 206 
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On October 19, 2017, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
EL18-12-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether the 
formula rate protocols of ATX Southwest, LLC may be unjust, 
unreasonable, unduly discriminatory or preferential. ATX Southwest, 
LLC, 161 FERC 61,049 (2017).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL18-12-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL18-12-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 
days of the date of issuance of the order.

    Dated: October 19, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-23288 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**EXHIBIT 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Michael Y. McGovern, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 of GeoMet, Inc.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: April 29, 2015

 

 
| By         | /s/ Michael Y. McGovern     |   |
|------------|-----------------------------|--------|
| ** ** | **Michael Y. McGovern,**    |   |
| ** ** | **Chief Executive Officer** |   |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          30,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,690
<PP&E>                                       2,000,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 229,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,123,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,786,114
<BONDS>                                        241,224
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,694
<OTHER-SE>                                   (908,342)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,123,690
<SALES>                                      1,515,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,515,489
<CGS>                                        1,905,335
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,926,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,432,272)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,432,272)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,432,272)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          64,708                  65,312
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,894                   5,291
<ALLOWANCES>                                       237                     100
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,091                  71,189
<PP&E>                                           6,250                   3,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,436                     683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,966                  74,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,667                   7,519
<BONDS>                                            142                     263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           206                     189
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,952                  66,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,966                  74,894
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,960                   7,234
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,247                   4,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,255                   3,726
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,172)                   (220)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,542)                   (596)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,370)                   (376)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,370)                   (376)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)                  (0.04)


</TABLE>
BURGER KING HOLDINGS, INC.
2006 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
 PERFORMANCE AWARD
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
 Award Agreement Plan
  Individual Performance Award:
    
    The number of Restricted Stock Units
underlying your Individual Performance Award
(the Individual Award) is available at
www.benefits.ml.com under the Grant
Information section.Performance Period:
    
    July 1, [___] through and ending on June
30, [___] (the Performance Period)Date of Grant:
    
    []Vesting Schedule:
    
    3 Year CliffVesting Date:
    
    [3rdanniversary of grant date]
(subject to the section entitled
Termination in Exhibit A hereto)
 Exhibit A




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE
PERFORMANCE AWARD
 No Payment for Shares .
  Nature of Award
  Determination of Number of RSUs Earned
  [# of RSUs = Company Performance Factor x Individual Award]
 [ date that is 90 days following beginning of performance period (or, if earlier, 1/4 of the
way through performance period) ]
 Settlement of RSUs .




---



##### 



Termination .
    e.g.




---



##### 



Cause  provided




---



##### 



Disability provided
 Without Cause provided
 Taxes .




---



##### 



No Guarantee of Continued Service .
  Termination for Cause; Restrictive Covenants .




---



##### 



Companys Right of Offset
 provided
 Acknowledgment of Nature of Award .




---



##### 



Data Privacy Notice and Consent .
   No Compensation Deferrals .




---



##### 



Securities Laws .
  Entire Agreement; Dispute Resolution; Governing Law .
    Electronic Delivery .




---



##### 



Agreement Severable .
  Language .
EX-35 (a)
(logo) OCWEN


ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

March 8, 2007

RE: NHEL 2006-HE1

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen Loan
Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance statement
pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance with the
servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set forth in
Regulation AB, 17 CFR Section 229.1100, et seq., ("Regulation AB"). In this
regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief in all material respects.

1.   A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period,
     and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as
     of February 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my
     supervision.

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all of
     its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
     Reporting Period.

By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name:  Ronald M. Faris
Title: President


Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
1661 Worthington Road Suite 100
Centrepark West
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Intermost
      Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation (the “Company”) with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months
      ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”), the undersigned, Rocky Wulianghai,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
      that
      to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





This
      certification is being provided
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor
      is
      it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.





Date:  November
      14, 2007








By:          /s/
      Rocky
      Wulianghai


Rocky
      Wulianghai, President and Chief Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3476 

To reauthorize the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area Citizen 

Advisory Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2009 

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. CARNEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation 

Area Citizen Advisory Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF DELAWARE WATER GAP 

4 NATIONAL RECREATION AREA CITIZEN ADVI5 SORY COMMISSION. 

6 (a) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 5 of Public Law 

7 100–573 (16 U.S.C. 460o note) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘20’’ and inserting ‘‘30’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3476 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall be deemed 

2 to have taken effect on October 30, 2008. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS