alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23310]



[[Page 49659]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management


Notice of Availability of the Proposed Notice of Sale for Gulf of 
Mexico Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Region-Wide Lease Sale 250; 
MMAA 104000

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Proposed Notice of Sale for Gulf 
of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Region-wide Lease Sale 
250.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) announces the 
availability of the Proposed Notice of Sale (NOS) for the proposed Gulf 
of Mexico (GOM) Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Lease Sale 
250 (GOM Region-wide Sale 250). This Notice is published pursuant to 30 
CFR 556.304(c). With regard to oil and gas leasing on the OCS, the 
Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to section 19 of the Outer 
Continental Shelf Lands Act, provides affected states the opportunity 
to review the Proposed NOS. The Proposed NOS sets forth the proposed 
terms and conditions of the sale, including minimum bids, royalty 
rates, and rental rates.

DATES: Affected states may comment on the size, timing, and location of 
proposed GOM Region-wide Sale 250 within 60 days following their 
receipt of the Proposed NOS. The Final NOS will be published in the 
Federal Register at least 30 days prior to the date of bid opening. Bid 
opening is currently scheduled for March 21, 2018.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Proposed NOS for GOM Region-wide Sale 
250 and Proposed NOS Package containing information essential to 
potential bidders may be obtained from the Public Information Unit, 
Gulf of Mexico Region, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 1201 Elmwood 
Park Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394; telephone: (504) 
736-2519. The Proposed NOS and Proposed NOS Package also are available 
on BOEM's Web site at http://www.boem.gov/Sale-250/.

AGENCY CONTACT: Dr. Andrew Krueger, Chief, Sales Coordination Branch, 
703-787-1554, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f899969c8a9d8fd6938a8d9d9f9d8ab89a979d95d69f978e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f899969c8a9d8fd6938a8d9d9f9d8ab89a979d95d69f978e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 23, 2017.
Walter D. Cruickshank,
Acting Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
[FR Doc. 2017-23310 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 07

- 16

- 00077

- CV

Tom Miller Appellant

v. F

- 40 Motorsports Appellee § § § § From the 69th District Court of Moore County May 20, 2016 Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated May 20, 2016 , it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that this appeal is dismissed.

It is further ordered that all costs in this behalf be assessed against the parties incurring them

. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that inasmuch as the appeal is dismissed at the appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertai ned, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of Findex.com, Inc. (the “company”) on Form
10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Steven
Malone, President and Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted), that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the company at the end of the periods covered by the Periodic Report.
 
 In
Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this
16 th day of
May, 2005.
 
 By
    /s/
      Steven MaloneSteven
      MalonePresident
      & Chief Executive Officer
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home
 News Articles
 Cruise Notices
 February 22, 2024

Notice to Passengers Regarding American Queen Voyages

Posted February 22, 2024 The Federal Maritime Commission has been informed that American Queen Voyages has shut down, cancelled all future voyages, and has filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United...

Categories:Cruise Notices,News Articles,Public NoticesJuly 5, 2023

Notice to Passengers Regarding Vantage Travel Services, Inc.

The Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) is aware that Vantage Travel Services, Inc. (Vantage) has filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The bankruptcy petition has been assigned...

Categories:Cruise Notices,News Articles Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          67,332                  65,312
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,312                   5,291
<ALLOWANCES>                                       154                     100
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,344                  71,189
<PP&E>                                           4,294                   3,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,000                     683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,288                  74,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,071                   7,519
<BONDS>                                            192                     263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           199                     189
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,826                  66,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,288                  74,894
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,173                   2,441
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,046                   1,527
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,174                   1,098
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,057)                      71
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,047)                   (184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (990)                   (255)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (990)                   (255)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)                  (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)                  (0.03)


</TABLE>
#### Janine Breland et al., Respondents, v Flushing YMCA, Appellant. (And Another Action.)

[666 NYS2d 473]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated October 7, 1996, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the defendant that the trial court should not have considered the affidavit submitted by the infant plaintiff in opposition to the motion for summary judgment, since it directly contradicted her prior, sworn testimony at an examination before trial (see, *Leale v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*222 AD2d 414; *Kistoo v City of New York,*195 AD2d 403).

Nevertheless, the court properly denied summary judgment. Although the defendant is not an insurer of the children entrusted to its care, it is under a duty to adequately supervise such children, and it can be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the lack of adequate supervision *(see generally, Mirand v City of New York,*84 NY2d 44; *Vonungern v Morris Cent. School,*240 AD2d 926). Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant did not demonstrate prima facie entitlement to judgment in its favor as a question of fact exists regarding whether or not its employees adequately supervised the infant plaintiff on the day in question *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and Santucci, JJ., concur.
1

The HONORABLE RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3718

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * District of Minnesota.

*

Antonio Soberanis-Sagrero, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: May 6, 2003

 Filed: May 16, 2003

___________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Soberanis-Sagrero pleaded guilty to possessing with the intent to

distribute approximately 695 grams of a substance containing methamphetamine, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). The district court1

 sentenced him

to 168 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel has

moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

raising the issue of the plea’s validity.
-2-

We find no plain error in the court’s acceptance of the guilty plea. See United

States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 58-59 (2002). We have reviewed the record

independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no

nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we

affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
99.2





CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10K of Grosvenor
Explorations Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Felimon A.
Lee, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.











September
13, 2008


FELIMON A.
LEE


Felimon A. Lee


Chief
Executive Officer,


President
and Director














-1-
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cesar Stapleton, Also Known as Ceasar Stapleton, Appellant.

[667 NYS2d 264]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 16, 1994 *(People v Stapleton,*204 AD2d 580), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 24, 1991.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and Joy, JJ., concur.
#### E.M., Respondent, v T.M., Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 187]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered November 29, 1996, which, insofar as appealed from, awarded plaintiff a money judgment against defendant of $100,350 for child support arrears due under the parties’ separation agreement, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s claim that he should be allowed a credit for amounts he has spent as a consequence of the parties’ daughter’s moving in with him is defeated by the separation agreement itself, which provides for child support payments to be made to plaintiff until February 22, 1997, regardless of the children’s residence. The issue of whether defendant is entitled to a credit for 1995 spousal maintenance was decided against him in a prior order from which no appeal was taken, and which therefore constitutes law of the case. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.
Exhibit 10.2

Third Amendment To Confidential Consulting Agreement

This Third Amendment
(Amendment), having an effective date of November 14, 2007 (Amendment Effective Date), is made to the agreement by and between TiVo Inc. (TiVo) and Financial Leadership Group, LLC
(FLG) dated July 9, 2007 (the Agreement).

WHEREAS, TiVo and FLG wish to extend the term of the
Agreement;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree that the Agreement is hereby further amended and supplemented as follows:



| | 1. | All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning specified in the Agreement.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The term of the Agreement is hereby extended until April 30, 2008, and shall automatically renew in 30 day increments unless either party provides 30 days written notice of its
intent to terminate the Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | The terms of this Amendment supercede and replace any conflicting terms contained in the Agreement, provided, however, that except as expressly set forth herein, nothing contained
in this Amendment shall amend, change, modify, or alter any other provision in the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives to be effective as of the date first written above.



|                           |  |                     |  |           |  |       |  |                      
|-------------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | --------- |  | ----- |  | ---------------------
|Financial Leadership Group |  |                     |  | TiVo Inc.
|                           |  |                     |  |          
|By:                        |  | /s/ Jeffrey S. Kuhn |  |           |  | By:   |  | /s/ Nancy Kato       
|Name:                      |  | Jeffrey S. Kuhn     |  |           |  | Name: |  | Nancy Kato           
|Its:                       |  | Managing Partner    |  |           |  | Its:  |  | Senior Vice President



|                  |  |       |  |    
|----------------- |  | ----- |  | ---
|November 26, 2001 |  | - 1 - |  | MPZ
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Agile Software Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2003
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Carolyn V. Aver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the
Company for the periods presented.



|                     |  |                                        
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2004 |  | /s/    CAROLYN V.
AVER                 
|                     |  | Carolyn V. Aver Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Agile Software Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act Filing of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespectively of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Agile Software Corporation and will be retained by Agile Software Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COMPROMISE AGREEMENT

This Agreement is entered into between:

(1) the Federal Maritime Commission, hereinafter referred to as Commission, and

(2) King Ocean Services, Ltd. (King Ocean), hereinafter referred to as Respondent.

Whereas the Commission is considering the institution of an assessment proceeding against 

Respondent for the recovery of civil penalties for alleged violations of section 10(b)(1) of the Shipping 

Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. § 41104(1), as well as the Commission’s regulations at 46 C.F.R. § 530.8;

Whereas this course of action is the result of alleged practices believed by the Commission to have 

been engaged in by Respondent, to wit:

King Ocean allowed its shipper customers to obtain ocean transportation for 

property at less than the rates and charges otherwise applicable by the 

device or means of unfiled or late-filed service contracts and corresponding 

service contract amendments.

Whereas, the Commission has authority under section 13(c) of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. 

§ 41109(a)-(b), and Part 502 of the Commission’s Regulations, 46 C.F.R. Part 502, to compromise and 

collect civil penalties;

Whereas, Respondent has terminated the practices which are the basis of the alleged violations set 

forth herein, and has committed to maintain measures designed to eliminate these practices by Respondent 

in the future.

Now Therefore, in consideration of the premises herein, and in compromise of all civil penalties 

arising from the alleged violations set forth and described herein, Respondent and the Commission hereby 

agree upon the following terms of settlement:

1. Respondent shall make monetary payment to the Commission by cashier’s or certified

check in the total amount of $50,000.
−2−

2. This instrument shall forever bar the commencement or institution of any assessment 

proceeding or other claim for recovery of civil penalties from Respondent, its officers, 

directors, or employees arising from the alleged violations set forth above that occurred 

between July 1, 2011 and March 7, 2016.

3. It is expressly understood that this Agreement is not, and is not to be construed as, an 

admission by Respondent to the alleged violations set forth above.

4. This agreement is subject to approval by the Commission’s Managing Director in 

accordance with 46 C.F.R. § 502.604.

KING OCEAN SERVICES, LTD.

 Signature: _____________________________ 

 Printed Name: __________________________ 

 Title: _________________________________ 

 Date: _________________________________ 

APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE

The above Terms and Conditions and Amount of Consideration are hereby approved and accepted:

By the Federal Maritime Commission:

_________________________________________

Peter J. King, Director (Date)

Bureau of Enforcement

_________________________________________________

Vern W. Hill, Managing Director (Date)