alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      2000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (2600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
[No. 67644-0-I.

Division One.

October 15, 2012.]

#### Bay View Electric, LLC, *Respondent,*v. Structural Concrete, Inc., et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 10-2-02046-1, Kenneth L. Cowsert, J., entered August 23, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Ellington, J.,

concurred in by Cox and Appelwick, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                          Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Florsheim Group Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (No. 333-42464 and 333-42495) of Florsheim Group Inc. and subsidiaries
of our report dated March 4, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Florsheim Group Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 29, 2001 and
December 30, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive loss, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years ended
December 29, 2001, December 30, 2000 and January 1, 2000, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 29, 2001
annual report on Form 10-K of Florsheim Group Inc.

Our report dated March 4, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company voluntarily filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 of
the United States Bankruptcy Code, which raises substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty.


Chicago, Illinois
March 27, 2002
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3537 

AN ACT 

To amend and reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp 

Conservation and Design Program Act of 1994. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3537 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Junior Duck Stamp 

3 Conservation and Design Program Reauthorization Act of 

4 2009’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

6 Congress finds the following: 

7 (1) In 2007–2008, sales of the $5 Junior Duck 

8 Stamp generated more than $100,000 in revenue, all 

9 of which was used to provide educational materials 

10 for the program, fund scholarships for students, and 

11 support and promote the program’s goal of con12 necting children with nature. 

13 (2) Now in its 20th year, the Junior Duck 

14 Stamp Conservation and Design Program is one of 

15 this country’s oldest and most successful govern16 ment-sponsored, youth-focused conservation biology 

17 programs. The program continues to build strong 

18 partnerships with public and parochial schools, 

19 homeschoolers and after-school programs, and other 

20 youth-focused education programs throughout the 

21 country. 

22 (3) The Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and 

23 Design Program continues to foster strong partner24 ships among Federal and State government agen25 cies, nongovernment organizations, the business 
3 

•HR 3537 EH

1 community, and others in the private sector to pro2 mote youth conservation initiatives. 

3 (4) With its conservation-focused science and 

4 arts curriculum, the Junior Duck Stamp Conserva5 tion and Design Program has helped prepare hun6 dreds of thousands of students to become stewards 

7 of America’s irreplaceable wild places and treasured 

8 outdoor heritage. 

9 SEC. 3. REPORTING REQUIREMENT. 

10 Section 2(c)(2) of the Junior Duck Stamp Conserva11 tion and Design Program Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 

12 719(c)(2)) is amended to read as follows: 

13 ‘‘(2) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Beginning in 

14 2010 and every 5 years thereafter, the Secretary 

15 shall submit to Congress a report on the status of 

16 the Program in each State.’’. 

17 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

18 Section 6 of the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation 

19 and Design Program Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 719c) is 

20 amended to read as follows: 
4 

•HR 3537 EH

1 ‘‘SEC. 6. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 ‘‘There is authorized to be appropriated to the Sec3 retary for administrative expenses of the Program 

4 $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2015.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 13, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3537 

AN ACT 

To amend and reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp 

Conservation and Design Program Act of 1994.
EXHIBIT 35.1
                     SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
                 RAMP SERIES 2006-RS2 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

      The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company,
      LLC, as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing
      Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time, the
      "Agreement"),   among  Residential  Asset  Mortgage  Products,   Inc.,  as
      depositor,  Residential Funding Company, LLC (formerly Residential Funding
      Corporation),  as master  servicer,  and  JPMorgan  Chase Bank,  N.A.,  as
      trustee,  does  hereby  certify  that:  1.  A  review  of  the  Servicer's
      activities  during the period  covered by the Issuing  Entity's  report on
      Form 10-K and of the Servicer's  performance  under the Agreement has been
      made under my supervision.  2. To the best of my knowledge,  based on such
      review,  the  Servicer  has  fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under the
      Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.
      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned  has duly executed this  Certificate
      this 26th day of March 2007.

      By:  /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
           -------------------------
          Name: Anthony N. Renzi
          Title: Managing Director
##### 



Exhibit 23.3
  
    a)
    
    The Company failed to properly track fixed assets and accumulated depreciation,
including work-in-progress accounts.b)
    
    The Company does not have sufficient personnel resources with appropriate
accounting expertise.c)
    
    The Company did not properly track inventory and management did not
sufficiently review the physical count worksheets to the final inventory lists.d)
    
    The Company did not sufficiently review the inter-company eliminations.e)
    
    The Company did not sufficiently document the system access controls around its
financial management information system.
----

Exhibit 32.2 Section1350 Certifications 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Reportof China Marketing Media Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for theperiod ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yifang Fu, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

(2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company. 

Date: April 17, 2007 

By: /s/ Yifang Fu----------------------------------------- Name: Yifang Fu Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) 

----
Exhibit 10.7
 LOOPNET, INC.
2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 GRANT DATE EMPNONAME
    Grant of Stock Units . SHARES
 Vesting Schedule . [GRANT DATE]
  GRANT DATE
 1




---



##### 



GRANT DATE
 GRANT
DATE
 Benefit Upon Vesting .
 Restrictions .
   GRANT DATE
 No Stockholder Rights .
 2




---



##### 



Taxes .
    3




---



##### 



Data Privacy Consent .
 Plan Information .
 Employee Acknowledgments .
 4




---



##### 



Miscellaneous .
     5




---



##### 



Accepted by Employee:
    
    
    
    LOOPNET, INC.By:[Employee Name]
    
    
    
    Name:Title:
  6
#### SHENGGANG NING, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-71809.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 24, 2011.

Shenggang Ning, Arcadia, CA, pro se.

Jeffrey Ronald Meyer, Esquire, OIL, Ann M. Welhaf, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Le-Fevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*754Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Shenggang Ning, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Ning’s motion to reopen because the motion was filed more than three years after the BIA’s October 20, 2005, order dismissing the underlying appeal, *see 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Ning failed to demonstrate that he acted with the due diligence required to warrant equitable tolling, *see Iturribarria,*321 F.3d at 897.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). *See Ekimian v. INS,*303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2002). If we had jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision, we would find no abuse of discretion.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of China Direct, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yi
(Jenny) Liu, Vice President of Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

                                      /s/ Yi (Jenny) Liu
                                      ---------------------------
November 14, 2006                     Yi (Jenny) Liu, Vice President of Finance,
                                      principal accounting and financial officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 336 

To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2009 

Ms. LEE of California (for herself, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. KUCINICH, Ms. EDDIE

BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, and Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the 

Peace Corps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Peace Stamp for the 

5 Peace Corps Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PEACE CORPS STAMP. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The United States Postal Service 

8 shall, for a 2-year period beginning no later than 12 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 336 IH

1 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, issue 

2 a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps. 

3 (b) REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITIES.—The 

4 issuance of such semipostal and the disposition of the 

5 amounts becoming available from the issuance of such 

6 semipostal shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, 

7 United States Code, subject to the following: 

8 (1) The differential included in the rate of post9 age established for such semipostal under section 

10 416(c) of such title may not exceed 25 percent. 

11 (2) The Peace Corps shall be the sole agency to 

12 which any amounts becoming available from the sale 

13 of such semipostal may be transferred under section 

14 416(d)(1) of such title. 

15 (c) SEMIPOSTAL DEFINED.—For purposes of this 

16 section, the term ‘‘semipostal’’ has the meaning given such 

17 term by section 416(a)(1) of such title. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 11, 2016

NO. 03

- 15

- 00380

- CV

Michael Warren, Appellant

v.

Krystal Charlene Ulatoski, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

REVERSED AND RENDERED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on July 20, 2015. Having reviewed

the reco rd and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the

court’s judgment . Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and renders judgment

denying appellee’s petition to modify the parent

- child relationship. A ppellee shall pay all costs

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
OFFICE OF THE AXTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

‘ , AUSTIN

Eodorable Ii.

Pat Edwards civq DiotriotAttorney pall&, Texas bar Sir:

IQ."plr letter of Jan opinion as lie

whether the Stamp Vernon'eAnnotated civil statut ooxding of ti

writtan lease oont

‘ Said Article reads in pa upon the ra1 ealea oontraat Ours whioh arc) the Oounty.Clerk WB State; provided imtxumen~s seam- $?!~o.oo) &116Y?6. OX less. i\t.\ ) )
us definitely

whetha? a aontraot n the lea00 ooagraot or not, xe o. W3636 whersia.

we expressedthe view that euoh an im.jtimmant need not be 6tainped if no litin

of any nature ig orea~ted ih the lnetruemnt. HeWfar, you haye sent to UB a.

oopy or cartein oorre.spondsnoe~trom which it ~eeina prebab1athat the laass oontraotwltb whioh pea are aanaamed oontaLnsa afause whfoh rstaine &Ilien agalnet all furniture, fixtures,etc., for the paymant of the- rent sgeaitledin theHonorableH. Pat Edwards,pa&e 2



### oontraot
. If 80, it gfioes ri#e to 6 lien Quitd eisilar to 

### it pot aotually a ahRtt81mortgage, The ref&ntal due is an obligation whether in the foxm or a note or not. 

### Ir the lease 

### aontraot bontainr m+oh a clause creatinga lien on personalproperty to aooure payment of the Yen-1 obligationIt Is .our opinion that the lastrumentmuat be staiped in aooordanoewith the provisionsof .Artlole9049s before it ~111 b6 entitledto reoord,
Yours very truly ATTORNEYGL%~ 03 TZXAS By (81 Glenn R. Lewis

Aesiatant
APPRCWED E#3. 18,~194S! . ‘Gxwet 8elJers FIRST ASSISTAXT ATTCI~ GEiqa &PPRovm Opinion Comnlttee By Bl,%:',B.

@alman
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49689-49690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23272]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permit Applications Received Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of Permit Applications Received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish a 
notice of permit applications received to conduct activities regulated 
under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. NSF has published 
regulations under the Antarctic Conservation Act in the Code of Federal 
Regulations. This is the required notice of permit applications 
received.

DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit written data, comments, 
or views with respect to this permit application by November 27, 2017. 
This application may be inspected by interested parties at the Permit 
Office, address below.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Permit Office, Office of 
Polar Programs, National Science

[[Page 49690]]

Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22314.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nature McGinn, ACA Permit Officer, at 
the above address, 703-292-8030, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#602123211005120d091413200e13064e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="05444644756077686c7176456b76632b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Science Foundation, as directed 
by the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-541, 45 CFR 670), 
as amended by the Antarctic Science, Tourism and Conservation Act of 
1996, has developed regulations for the establishment of a permit 
system for various activities in Antarctica and designation of certain 
animals and certain geographic areas a requiring special protection. 
The regulations establish such a permit system to designate Antarctic 
Specially Protected Areas.

Application Details

Applicant

    Permit Application: 2018-022 Jennifer Burns, National Science 
Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22314.

Activity for Which Permit is Requested

    Harmful Interference. The applicant will be conducting programmatic 
oversight activities that may involve approaching seabird colonies near 
Palmer Station in the Antarctic Peninsula. The applicant is seeking a 
permit for harmful interference for incidental disturbance of penguins 
or petrels during the conduct of the oversight activities.

Location

    Torgersen Island; Humble Island; Palmer Basin (ASMA 7).

Dates

    December 12-20, 2017.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Polar Coordination Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2017-23272 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
LaBranche & Co Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George M.L. LaBranche, IV, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by the
Report.



|                   |  |                                                        |  |                               
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2011 |  | By:                                                    |  | /s/ George M. L. LaBranche, IV
|                   |  | Name: George M.L. LaBranche, IV                       
|                   |  | Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be retained by LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.