alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________ No. 07 - 15 - 00415 - CV

________________________ MATTHEW BAUMAN , APPELLANT

V. ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 223rd District Court

Gray County, Texas Trial Court No. 37,512 ; Honorable Phil N. Vanderpool , Presiding

December 7 , 2015 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant, Matthew Bauman , gave notice of appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Appellee, Aldridge Electric, Inc . By letter dated November 4 , 2015, the c lerk of this c ourt advised Bauman that a filing fee of $205 was overdue and notified him that failure to submit payment within ten days would subject the appeal to dismissal pursuant to Rule 42.3(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.2

Bauman has not responded, paid the filing fee, nor made other arrangements for the discharge of the filing fee. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 12.1(b). Unless a party is excused from p aying a filing fee, the clerk of this c ourt is required to collect filing fees set by statute or the Texas Supreme Court when an item is presented for filing. See id. at 5, 12.1(b). Although the filing of a proper notice of appeal invokes an appellate co urt’s jurisdiction, if a party fails to follow the prescribed rules of appellate procedure, the appeal may be dismissed. Id . at 25.1(b). Accordingly, having provided Bauman a reasonable opportunity to cur e this defect, this appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules and failure to comply with a notice from the c lerk requiring action within a specified time. T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(c). Per Curiam
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Herbert Cisco HAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20473

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Mai'garet Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Herbert Cisco Hay presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by *United States v. Daugherty,*264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Emergency Filtration Products, Inc. (the ACompany@) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the AReport@), I, Douglas K. Beplate, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Douglas K. Beplate Douglas K. Beplate, Principal Executive Officer  Date: August 14, 2006   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Arturo QUINTANA-HOLGUIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-51355

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 2008.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 3:07-CR-1777-ALL.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Arturo Quintana-Holguin raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *cert. denied,*-U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
** **

**Exhibit 15.1**

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

**To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of GW Pharmaceuticals plc**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatement No. 333-195747 on Form F-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-204389 on Form S-8 of our reports dated December 5, 2016,relating to the consolidated financial statements of GW Pharmaceuticals plc, and the effectiveness of GW Pharmaceuticals plc’sinternal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of GW Pharmaceuticals plc for the yearended September 30, 2016.

 

/s/ Deloitte LLP

 

London, United Kingdom

December 5, 2016
FLRA NEWS

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY - WASHINGTON, DC 20424

Contact: Eric Prag FLRA.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 771-444-5859 June 5, 2023

President Biden Announces Intent to Nominate Suzanne Elizabeth Summerlin for FLRA 

General Counsel

President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. has announced his intent to nominate Suzanne Elizabeth 

Summerlin to be General Counsel of the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA).

Summerlin currently serves as Deputy General Counsel and Deputy Executive Director for the 

Federal Education Association, representing educators who serve United States military families 

stateside and overseas. Previously, she served as Associate General Counsel for the National 

Federation of Federal Employees, the federal sector affiliate of the International Association of 

Machinists and Aerospace Workers, and was a Peggy Browning Fund Fellow at the American 

Federation of Government Employees within the AFL-CIO.

Summerlin has extensive experience in federal sector labor law, advocating for a wide range of 

civilian employees at more than thirty agencies, including U.S. Forest Service wildland 

firefighters, Department of State passport processors, General Services Administration contract 

administrators, Veterans Administration medical professionals, Transportation Security 

Administration security screeners, and Army Corps of Engineers employees. In her work, 

Summerlin has litigated cases in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and the U.S. 

Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. She has also negotiated collective bargaining 

agreements on behalf of doctors and nurses at the Department of Veterans Affairs, and educators 

serving in Europe and Asia with the Department of Defense Education Activity.

Prior to beginning her legal career, Summerlin was an award-winning broadcast journalist, 

working as a television news producer and documentary film producer. Summerlin earned her 

undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Florida.

For more information on the General Counsel’s office, click here.

###

The FLRA administers the labor-management relations program for 2.1 million non-Postal federal 

employees worldwide, approximately 1.2 million of whom are represented in 2,200 bargaining 

units. It is charged with providing leadership in establishing policies and guidance related to 

federal sector labor-management relations and with resolving disputes under, and ensuring 

compliance with, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001088787
<NAME> CAPROCK CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5000000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-97-000]


MS Solar 3, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding MS 
Solar 3, LLC`s application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 8, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d2b283f2e2203010403083e181d1d021f192d0b081f0e430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="05434057464a6b696c6b60567075756a777145636077662b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: October 19, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-23297 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Nataki Culpepper, Respondent, v Randy Express Cab Corp. et al., Appellants.

[987 NYS2d 186]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Randy Express Cab Corp. and Nzian Yao appeal, and the defendant Samantha Campbell separately appeals, as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated January 8, 2013, as denied their separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injury to the cervical region of the plaintiffs spine did not constitute a serious injury under either the permanent consequential limitation of use or significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Staff v Yshua,*59 AD3d 614 [2009]).

*739In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether she sustained a serious injury to the cervical region of her spine *(see generally Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 218-219 [2011]). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied both motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of the defendants.

Rivera, J.E, Dickerson, Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001088789
<NAME>                                         Archer Systems Limited, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         723
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,953
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 521,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          38,039
<BONDS>                                        111,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       864
<OTHER-SE>                                     371,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   521,703
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,312
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               59,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (56,215)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (56,215)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (56,215)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Voiceserve, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the for the year ended March 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael Bibelman, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
                  The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
 (2)
                The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented.
 Dated: 
July 14, 2008
  By: /s/ Michael
Bibelman
 Michael
Bibelman
 Chief Executive
Officer
----

**EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

The certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. James Shepard, the ChiefExecutive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer ofTyphoon Tunes Inc. hereby certifies that: 1. the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2. the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TyphoonTunes Inc.                                               TYPHOON TUNES INC., RegistrantDated: October 30, 2006                    /s/ James Shepard

                                               By: James Shepard, President, Principal Executive Officer,                                               Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director

----
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Section 906 Certification
                                     by the
               Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

         Each of Thomas J. Mazzarisi, Chief Executive Officer, and Stephen J.
Schoepfer, Chief Financial Officer, of JAG Media Holdings, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
October 31, 2005 ("Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

/s/ Thomas J. Mazzarisi                              /s/ Stephen J. Schoepfer
-------------------------                            ---------------------------
Name: Thomas J. Mazzarisi                            Name: Stephen J. Schoepfer

Date: December 20, 2005
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Phillip C. ScottPhillip                C. ScottChief                Financial Officer Janaury                24, 2007 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darren SHIRA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-14906

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 4, 2011.

Linda Julin McNamara, Robert E. O’Neill, David Paul Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Karen L. Gable, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cynthia A. Hawkins, Cynthia Hawkins, PA, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Thomas H. Dale, Dale Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before MARCUS, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Darren Shira in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). *768Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Shira’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.