alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 348 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 348

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to complete a special resource 
   study to determine the suitability and feasibility of adding the 
    birthplace site to the Harry S Truman National Historic Site or 
 designating the site as a separate unit of the National Park System, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2009

 Mr. Skelton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to complete a special resource 
   study to determine the suitability and feasibility of adding the 
    birthplace site to the Harry S Truman National Historic Site or 
 designating the site as a separate unit of the National Park System, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Harry S Truman Birthplace Study 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall complete a special resource 
study of the Harry S Truman Birthplace State Historic Site in Lamar, 
Missouri, to determine--
            (1) the suitability and feasibility of adding the 
        birthplace site to the Harry S Truman National Historic Site or 
        designating the site as a separate unit of the National Park 
        System; and
            (2) the methods and means for the protection and 
        interpretation of the Harry S Truman Birthplace State Historic 
        Site by the National Park Service, other Federal, State, or 
        local government entities or private or nonprofit 
        organizations.
    (b) Study Requirements.--The Secretary shall conduct the study in 
accordance with section 8(c) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)).
    (c) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds 
are made available to carry out this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report 
containing--
            (1) the results of the study; and
            (2) any recommendations of the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
#### Timothy Randolph WALLACE, Petitioner-Appellant v. Brad LIVINGSTON, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-10772

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 8, 2008.

Timothy R. Wallace, Abilene, TX, pro se.

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Timothy Randolph Wallace, Texas prisoner #894160, was convicted in 1999 of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and was sentenced to 37 years in prison. Wallace appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus application challenging that conviction. After Wallace filed his § 2254 application, the district court administratively closed the case and unfiled the documents because Wallace had failed to obtain permission to file the case as was required by an earlier order of that court in *Wallace v. Cockrell,*No. 3:02-CV-1807, 2003 WL 21447831 (N.D.Tex. Mar. 27, 2003).

This § 2254 application was not Wallace’s first, and the sole claim raised in the current application was raised in Wallace’s earlier application. Thus, the current application was successive, *see In re Cain,*137 F.3d 234, 235 (5th Cir.1998), but Wallace never obtained authorization to file it as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Accordingly, the district court was correct to dismiss it. *See id.; United States v. Key,*205 F.3d 773, 774 (5th Cir.2000) (holding that a district court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an unauthorized successive application). We affirm the dismissal on that alternative basis. *See United States v. Early,*27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir.1994) (recognizing that denial of unauthorized motion may be affirmed on alternative basis of lack of jurisdiction).

In light of the frivolous nature of this appeal and the injunction imposed by the district court, Wallace is hereby warned that the filing of frivolous, repetitive, or otherwise abusive filings will invite the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal, monetary sanctions, and/or restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court and any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction.

AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 31.4

Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to

Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Assaf Ginzburg, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Delek US Holdings, Inc.; and

2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



By:

/s/ Assaf GinzburgAssaf GinzburgExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Dated: June 26, 2014
FLRA NEWS

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY - WASHINGTON, DC 20424

Contact: Eric Prag FLRA.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 771-444-5859 October 11, 2023

The FLRA Proposes Revisions to its Privacy Act Regulations.

Today, the Federal Labor Relations Authority (the FLRA) proposed revisions to its Privacy Act 

regulations. The proposed regulations centralize the intake and processing of Privacy Act 

requests for records related to work performed by the three-member Authority component, the 

Office of General Counsel, and the Federal Service Impasses Panel with the Office of the 

Solicitor. The Office of the Inspector General will continue to process Privacy Act requests for 

records related to work performed by the Inspector General’s office. The proposed regulations 

also streamline and update procedures for a request, such as procedures for accountings of record 

disclosures. 

The FLRA welcomes comments on the proposed rule. Comments must be received on or before 

November 13, 2023. The Federal Register Notice includes instructions for submitting comments. 

For more information on the FLRA’s Privacy Act program, click here.

###

The FLRA administers the labor-management relations program for 2.1 million non-Postal federal 

employees worldwide, approximately 1.2 million of whom are represented in 2,200 bargaining 

units. It is charged with providing leadership in establishing policies and guidance related to 

federal sector labor-management relations and with resolving disputes under, and ensuring 

compliance with, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3514 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3514

      To amend the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2009

 Mr. Schrader introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE NATIONAL SCENIC AREA 
              ACT.

    Section 2(g) of the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act 
(16 U.S.C. 544(g)) is amended by striking ``and the Confederated Tribes 
of the Umatilla Indian Reservation;'' and inserting ``the Confederated 
Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, and the Confederated Tribes 
of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon;''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-35 (e)
(logo) WELLS FARGO


Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 21, 2007


Banc of America Funding Corporation
214 North Tyron Street
Charlotte, NC 28255


RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Banc of America Funding 2006-2 Trust


Per Section 3.20 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 2/27/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:


(a)   a review of the activities of such party during the preceding calendar
      year or portion thereof and of performance of such party under this
      Agreement has been made under such officers' supervision and


(b)   to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
      has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
      respects throughout such year, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill
      any such obligation in any material respect, specifying each such failure
      known to such officer and the nature and status thereof.


Certified By:
/s/ Christopher C. Regnier
Christopher C. Regnier, Vice President


Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
Exhibit
        10.20

    

    
 

    LICENSE
      TERMINATION AGREEMENT

    (Coates
      Trust to CIL)

    


    This
      License Termination Agreement (the “Agreement”)
      is
      entered into as of April 6, 2007 between Coates Trust, a trust formed under
      the
      laws of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas, having an address at Katherina Court
      101, East Hill Place, Market Street, North, Nassau, the Bahamas (“Coates
      Trust”)
      and
      Coates International, Ltd., a Delaware corporation (“CIL”).
      

    


    WHEREAS,
      Coates Trust and CIL entered into that certain License Agreement, dated as
      of
      October 23, 2006 (the “2006
      License”);
      and

     

    WHEREAS,
      after signing the 2006 License CIL’s business needs changed, so the 2006 License
      was not implemented;

     

    NOW
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and in further consideration of
      the
      mutual covenants and promises hereinafter contained, and for other good and
      valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
      acknowledged, CIL and Coates Trust agree as follows:

     

    1. Cancellation
      and Termination of the 2006 License.
      CIL and
      Coates Trust each hereby agrees that effective as of the date hereof, the 2006
      License and all of the rights and obligations of the parties thereunder are
      hereby terminated. CIL and Coates Trust hereby waive any rights claims or
      demands they may have in connection with the 2006 License.

     

    2. Governing
      Law.
      This
      Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of
      the
      State of New Jersey, without regard to the conflicts of law rules of such
      state.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement
      to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly
      authorized.

     

    
      	
              COATES
                INTERNATIONAL LTD.
  	 	
              COATES
                TRUST

               
  
	By:	/s/
              Barry C. Kaye
              	 	By:
	/s/
              George J.
              Coates
	 	
              

              Name:
                Barry C. Kaye

            	 	 	
              

              Name:
                George J. Coates

            
	 	
              Title:
                Chief Financial Officer
#### John Wellington, Respondent, v Mark Grossman, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[669 NYS2d 116]

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: No appeal as of right to this Court lies from an order setting forth a schedule for the completion of discovery and the date for a pretrial conference where the order is granted in the absence of a motion on notice (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Fahey, J.—Discovery.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Fallon, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Leon MERTENS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-30077.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 5, 2008.*

Filed May 7, 2008.

Nancy D. Cook, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Coeur D’Alene, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Greg S. Silvey, Esq., Kuna, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: ALARCÓN, GRABER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Defendant Robert Leon Mertens appeals the district court’s holding, on remand from this court, that it would not have imposed a different sentence under the now-advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm.

1. The district court correctly interpreted our “limited remand” as a remand pursuant to the procedures announced in *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). *See United States v. Mertens,*166 Fed.Appx. 955, 958 (9th *717Cir.) (unpublished disposition) (“Our decision in *United States v. Moreno-Hernandez,*419 F.3d 906 (9th Cir.2005), obliges us to order a limited remand to the district court.”), cert. *denied,*547 U.S. 1158, 126 S.Ct. 2312, 164 L.Ed.2d 831 (2006). Although we cited *Moreno-Hernandez,*not *Ameline,*the former case interpreted and applied the latter.

2. We decline to exercise our discretion to reach Defendant’s argument concerning crack cocaine, raised for the first time in a post-briefing letter. *See United States v. Schiff,*379 F.3d 621, 630 (9th Cir.2004) (holding that we may decline to reach an issue raised for the first time on appeal). Our decision does not prejudice Defendant’s right to seek re-sentencing through the procedures set forth at 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 15-0124

MORLOCK, L.L.C.

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK,

TRUSTEE

§

§

§

§

§

§

Harris County,

1st District.

September 4, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, MORLOCK, L.L.C., pay all costs incurred on this

petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 15th day of October, 2015.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-141408 and 333-135119) pertaining to the Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. 2006 Performance Incentive Plan and 1999 Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 333-145944)pertaining to the registration of shares of common stock of Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, of our reports dated March 14, 2008 with respect to the financial statements of Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

March 14, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          40,382
<SECURITIES>                                     4,207
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,313
<PP&E>                                       3,765,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                 392,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,029,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          371,585
<BONDS>                                        204,738
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,297,190
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,843,869)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,029,644
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               229,679
<CGS>                                            9,234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  885,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,755
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (667,835)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (667,835)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (667,835)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)




</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2006,                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                    |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended December 31, 2006, fairly represents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of Thermal                Technology Services, Inc. |

| Date:                March 16, 2007                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                          |
| Thermal                Technology Services, Inc.                                                              |
|                                                                                                          |
| By:                /s/                *Michael                Raleigh*                                        |
| Michael                Raleigh Chief                Executive Officer, Chief Financial                Officer |
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------


                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of PalWeb
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the Period Ended November 30, 2002 (the "Report"),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 14, 2003                   /s/ Warren F. Kruger
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         Warren F. Kruger
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer




     The  foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350.
Home > FTDO > Opening Statement of Commissioner Max Vekich at Informal Hearing of the Federal Maritime Commission Examining Impacts to Shipping Resulting from Current Conditions in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Regions

## Opening Statement of Commissioner Max Vekich at Informal Hearing of the Federal Maritime Commission Examining Impacts to Shipping Resulting from Current Conditions in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Regions

Posted on:

February 7, 2024
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7352

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL A. HARRIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-93-1, CA-968-4)

Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 29, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214, and his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Harris, Nos. CR-93-1; CA-968-4 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25,

1996; July 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED