49422 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices 

Sony Storage Media Solutions 

Corporation, 1–7–1 Ko ̄nan, Minatoku, Tokyo 108–0075, Japan 

Sony Storage Media Manufacturing 

Corporation, 3–4–1 Sakuragi, Tagajo, 

Miyagi 985–0842, Japan 

Sony DADC US Inc., 1800 North 

Fruitridge Avenue, Terre Haute, IN 

47804 

Sony Latin America Inc., 5201 Blue 

Lagoon Drive, Suite 400, Miami, FL 

33126 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 19, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–23105 Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1077] 

Certain Reusable Diapers, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing the Same; Institution of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

September 19, 2017, under section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

on behalf of Cotton Babies, Inc. of 

Fenton, Missouri. A supplement to the 

Complaint was filed on October 2, 2017. 

The complaint alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain reusable diapers, components 

thereof, and products containing the 

same by reason of infringement of U.S. 

Trademark Registration No. 4,120,270 

(‘‘the ’270 trademark’’) and certain 

claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,518,007 

(‘‘the ’007 patent’’). The complaint 

further alleges that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by the 

applicable Federal Statute. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

general exclusion order, or in the 

alternative a limited exclusion order, 

and cease and desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 

and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

October 19, 2017, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine: 

(a) Whether there is a violation of 

subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain reusable diapers, components 

thereof, and products containing the 

same by reason of infringement of one 

or more of claims 1, 13, 20, and 21 of 

the ’007 patent, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(b) Whether there is a violation of 

subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain reusable diapers, components 

thereof, and products containing the 

same by reason of infringement of the 

’270 trademark, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Cotton Babies, 

Inc., 1299 N. Highway Drive, Fenton, 

MO 63026. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and is the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Alvababy.com, 4th Floor, Building 5, 

Zone 2, Qingxiechang, Yaqiuhu 

Industrial Park, Mumianwan, Buji 

Street, Longgang District, ShenZhen, 

Guangdong, China 

Shenzhen Adsel Trading Co., Ltd., 

d/b/a Alva, Room 802, 8/F Haoyunlai 

Building, Yanhe Road; Luohu District, 

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China 518000 

Huizhou Huapin Garment Co., Ltd., 

Plant 23, Gexin Street, Sandong 

Town, Huizhou, Guangdong, China 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices 49423 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

2Commissioner Broadbent voted to conduct full 

reviews. 

3The Commission has found the responses 

submitted by Bull Moose Tube Company, 

EXLTUBE, TMK IPSCO Tubulars, Zekelman 

Industries, and the Government of Turkey to be 

individually adequate. Comments from other 

interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 

207.62(d)(2)). 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 19, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–23106 Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–253 and 731– 

TA–132, 252, 271, 273, 532–534, and 536 

(Fourth Review)] 

Certain Circular Welded Wipe and 

Wube (CWP) From Brazil, India, Korea, 

Mexico, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey; 

Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year 

Reviews 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of expedited 

reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

order on welded carbon steel pipe and 

tube from Turkey and the antidumping 

duty orders on certain circular welded 

pipe and tube from Brazil, India, Korea, 

Mexico, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury within 

a reasonably foreseeable time. 

DATES: This determination was made on 

September 5, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amelia Shister (202–205–2047), Office 

of Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On September 5, 2017, 

the Commission determined that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (82 

FR 25328, June 1, 2017) of the subject 

five-year reviews was adequate and that 

the respondent interested party group 

response was inadequate in each 

review. The Commission did not find 

any other circumstances that would 

warrant conducting full reviews.1

Accordingly, the Commission 

determined that it would conduct 

expedited reviews pursuant to section 

751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).2

For further information concerning 

the conduct of these reviews and rules 

of general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B 

(19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

Staff report.—A staff report 

containing information concerning the 

subject matter of the reviews will be 

placed in the nonpublic record on 

December 12, 2017, and made available 

to persons on the Administrative 

Protective Order service list for these 

reviews. A public version will be issued 

thereafter, pursuant to section 

207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions.—As provided in 

section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s 

rules, interested parties that are parties 

to the reviews and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,3 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

reviews may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determination the 

Commission should reach in the 

reviews. Comments are due on or before 

December 15, 2017 and may not contain 

new factual information. Any person 

that is neither a party to the five-year 

reviews nor an interested party may 

submit a brief written statement (which 

shall not contain any new factual 

information) pertinent to the reviews by 

December 15, 2017. However, should 

the Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Commerce’’) extend the time limit for 

its completion of the final results of its 

reviews, the deadline for comments 

(which may not contain new factual 

information) on Commerce’s final 

results is three business days after the 

issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. The Commission’s rules with 

respect to filing were revised effective 

July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, 

2014), and the revised Commission 

Handbook on E-filing, available from the 

Commission’s Web site at https://

www.usitc.gov/secretary/documents/ 

handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the reviews must be 

served on all other parties to the reviews 

(as identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination.—The Commission has 

determined these reviews are 

extraordinarily complicated and 

therefore has determined to exercise its 

authority to extend the review period by 

up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES