Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices 49421 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Dexcom, Inc., 

6340 Sequence Drive, San Diego, CA 

92121. 

(b) The respondent is the following 

entity alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and is the party upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

AgaMatrix, Inc., 7C Raymond Avenue, 

Salem, NH 03079. 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations will not 

participate as a party in this 

investigation. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of institution of investigation 

must be submitted by the named 

respondent in accordance with section 

210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 

210.13(a), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the Commission of the 

complaint and the notice of institution 

of investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of the respondent to file a 

timely response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order, or both directed 

against the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 19, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–23104 Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1076] 

Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes 

and Cartridges Containing the Same 

(II); Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

September 19, 2017, under section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

on behalf of FUJIFILM Corporation of 

Japan and FUJIFILM Recording Media 

U.S.A., Inc. of Bedford, Massachusetts. 

A supplement to the complaint was 

filed on October 6, 2017. The complaint 

alleges violations of section 337 based 

upon the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain magnetic data 

storage tapes and cartridges containing 

the same by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 

6,630,256 (‘‘the ’256 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 6,835,451 (‘‘the ’451 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 7,011,899 (‘‘the ’899 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,462,905 (‘‘the 

’905 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 

6,783,094 (‘‘the ’094 patent’’). The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. 

The complainants request that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 

and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

October 19, 2017, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain magnetic data 

storage tapes and cartridges containing 

the same by reason of infringement of 

one or more of claims 1–5 and 7–9 of 

the ’256 patent; 1–14 of the ’451 patent; 

claims 1, 2, and 6–12 of the ’899 patent; 

claims 1–4 of the ’905 patent; and 

claims 1–12 and 18–22 of the ’094 

patent, and whether an industry in the 

United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the 

presiding administrative law judge shall 

take evidence or other information and 

hear arguments from the parties and 

other interested persons with respect to 

the public interest in this investigation, 

as appropriate, and provide the 

Commission with findings of fact and a 

recommended determination on this 

issue, which shall be limited to the 

statutory public interest factors set forth 

in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are: 

FUJIFILM Corporation, 7–3 Akasaka 9- 

chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107–0052, 

Japan 

FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc., 

45 Crosby Drive, Bedford, MA 01730– 

1401 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Sony Corporation, 1–7–1 Ko ̄nan, 

Minato-ku, Tokyo 108–0075, Japan 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
49422 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices 

Sony Storage Media Solutions 

Corporation, 1–7–1 Ko ̄nan, Minatoku, Tokyo 108–0075, Japan 

Sony Storage Media Manufacturing 

Corporation, 3–4–1 Sakuragi, Tagajo, 

Miyagi 985–0842, Japan 

Sony DADC US Inc., 1800 North 

Fruitridge Avenue, Terre Haute, IN 

47804 

Sony Latin America Inc., 5201 Blue 

Lagoon Drive, Suite 400, Miami, FL 

33126 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 19, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–23105 Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1077] 

Certain Reusable Diapers, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing the Same; Institution of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

September 19, 2017, under section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

on behalf of Cotton Babies, Inc. of 

Fenton, Missouri. A supplement to the 

Complaint was filed on October 2, 2017. 

The complaint alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain reusable diapers, components 

thereof, and products containing the 

same by reason of infringement of U.S. 

Trademark Registration No. 4,120,270 

(‘‘the ’270 trademark’’) and certain 

claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,518,007 

(‘‘the ’007 patent’’). The complaint 

further alleges that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by the 

applicable Federal Statute. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

general exclusion order, or in the 

alternative a limited exclusion order, 

and cease and desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 

and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

October 19, 2017, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine: 

(a) Whether there is a violation of 

subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain reusable diapers, components 

thereof, and products containing the 

same by reason of infringement of one 

or more of claims 1, 13, 20, and 21 of 

the ’007 patent, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(b) Whether there is a violation of 

subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain reusable diapers, components 

thereof, and products containing the 

same by reason of infringement of the 

’270 trademark, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Cotton Babies, 

Inc., 1299 N. Highway Drive, Fenton, 

MO 63026. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and is the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Alvababy.com, 4th Floor, Building 5, 

Zone 2, Qingxiechang, Yaqiuhu 

Industrial Park, Mumianwan, Buji 

Street, Longgang District, ShenZhen, 

Guangdong, China 

Shenzhen Adsel Trading Co., Ltd., 

d/b/a Alva, Room 802, 8/F Haoyunlai 

Building, Yanhe Road; Luohu District, 

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China 518000 

Huizhou Huapin Garment Co., Ltd., 

Plant 23, Gexin Street, Sandong 

Town, Huizhou, Guangdong, China 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES