alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (the
“Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Warren F. Kruger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











April
      19, 2010
              /s/ Warren
      F. KrugerWarren
      F. KrugerPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part
of the Report.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Magdalena SANTANA RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-50351.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 14, 2011.

Jeff P. Mitchell, Esquire, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.

Kenneth M. Stern, Esquire, Law Offices of Kenneth M. Stern, Woodland Hills, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Magdalena Santana Ramirez, Adelanto, CA, pro se.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Magdalena Santana Ramirez appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for possession of an unregistered firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ramirez’s counsel has *716filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1



Certification



I, Brett C. Brewer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of eUniverse Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.



|                       |  | 
|---------------------- |  | 
|Date: October 30, 2003 |  | 
|                       |  | 
|                       |  | 



28
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      $  374,598
<SECURITIES>                                $        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               $    2,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                $        0
<INVENTORY>                                 $   45,964
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $  448,145
<PP&E>                                      $  652,487
<DEPRECIATION>                              $  554,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $  756,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       $  312,726
<BONDS>                                     $        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       $        0
<PREFERRED>                                 $        0
<COMMON>                                    $   45,593
<OTHER-SE>                                  $  398,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                $  519,854
<SALES>                                     $        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            $   42,490
<CGS>                                       $   64,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               $  484,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            $        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            $        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         $  (11,250)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            $ (453,445)
<INCOME-TAX>                                $        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        $ (453,445)
<DISCONTINUED>                              $        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             $        0
<CHANGES>                                   $        0
<NET-INCOME>                               $ (453,445)
<EPS-BASIC>                                $    (.011)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              $    (.011)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification ofChief Executive Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K of Verigy Ltd. (the “Company”) forthe fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Keith L. Barnes, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presentedand consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
| Date: December 21, 2006 | /s/ Keith L.  Barnes           |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                              | **Keith  L. Barnes**           |
|                              | ***Chief  Executive Officer*** |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63of title 18, United States Code) and is not filed with the Securities andExchange Commission as part of the Form 10-K or as a separatedisclosure document and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof the Verigy Ltd. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act Filing of 1934, as amended (whether made before orafter the date of the Form 10-K), irrespectively of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Verigy Ltd. and will be retained by Verigy Ltd. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Dated:  March 29, 2007                                                                            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:By: /s/        E. Todd Whittemore                                                             Title:Executive Vice President, Master ServicingAurora Loan Services LLC,   as Master ServicerI, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Lehman XS Trust, Series 2006-2N  (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.E. Todd Whittemore**Exhibit 31 : Sarbanes-Oxley Certification**Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as ServicerDeutsche Bank National Trust Company, as CustodianDeutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Sub-Contractor for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., as ServicerNewport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Paying Agent and Custodian
#### Joseph Frumusa et al., Appellants, v P. J. Weyer Construction, Inc., et al., Respondents. (And Third-Party Actions.)

[666 NYS2d 210]

—In an action to recover damages for *417personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), entered July 30, 1996, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants on the issue of liability, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered September 23, 1996, which dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The plaintiffs’ contention that the Supreme Court erroneously failed to charge the jury under Labor Law § 200 with respect to the defendants’ general contractor P. J. Weyer Construction, Inc. (hereinafter P. J. Weyer) and its subcontractor R.J.C. Ceiling, Inc. (hereinafter R.J.C. Ceiling) is unpreserved for appellate review because the plaintiffs failed to request a charge in that regard or take exception to the charge as delivered (see, CPLR 4110-b; *De Long v County of Erie,*60 NY2d 296; *Morrissey v City of New York,*221 AD2d 607; *Rossetti v Campanella,*118 AD2d 552). In any event, since Labor Law § 200 is a codification of common-law negligence principles concerning the duty imposed upon an owner or general contractor to provide workers with a safe work environment (see, *Comes v New York State Elec. & Gas Corp.,*82 NY2d 876), it was not applicable to R.J.C. Ceiling, the subcontractor. Furthermore, the court’s lengthy charge on negligence in this case was adequate to encompass P. J. Weyer’s liability under Labor Law § 200 (see, *Osnato v New York City Tr. Auth.,*172 AD2d 597).

The court correctly denied the plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict under CPLR 4404. The record reveals that the jury could have reached its determination upon a fair interpretation of the evidence presented with consideration given to the credibility of the witnesses and the drawing of reasonable inferences (see, *Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493; *Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129; *Pomaro v McKeon,*228 AD2d 572; *Harris v Armstrong,*97 AD2d 947, *affd*64 NY2d 700).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions, raised for the first *418time on appeal, are not properly before this Court. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Thompson and Altman, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23289]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL18-15-000]


Kanstar Transmission, LLC; Notice of Institution of Section 206 
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On October 19, 2017, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
EL18-15-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether the 
formula rate protocols of Kanstar Transmission, LLC may be unjust, 
unreasonable, unduly discriminatory or preferential. Kanstar 
Transmission, LLC, 161 FERC 61,052 (2017).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL18-15-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL18-15-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 
days of the date of issuance of the order.

    Dated: October 19, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-23289 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1**




**Certification**




I,
      Terry
      L. McCoy, in my capacity as Executive Vice President of First Horizon Asset
      Securities Inc. (the Depositor) do hereby certify that:





1.    I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
      be
      filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of First
      Horizon Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2006-AR1 (the “Exchange Act periodic
      reports”);





2.Based
      on
      my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
      contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which
      such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
      by
      this report;





3.    Based
      on
      my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
      to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included
      in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  Based
      upon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
      under Item 1123 of Regulation AB and except as disclosed in the Exchange
      Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under
      the
      servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5.    All
      of
      the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
      with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
      in
      this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange
      Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
      report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
      of
      noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
      on
      Form 10-K.





In
      giving
      the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
      to me
      by The Bank of New York.







**First
                Horizon Asset Securities Inc., as Depositor**By:
            /s/
                Terry L. McCoyTerry
                L. McCoy,Executive
                Vice President
              (Senior
                Officer of the Depositor in charge of
              Securitization)




Date:
      March 26, 2007
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3433 

To amend the North American Wetlands Conservation Act to establish requirements regarding payment of the non-Federal share of the costs 

of wetlands conservation projects in Canada that are funded under that 

Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2009 

Mr. WITTMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the North American Wetlands Conservation Act 

to establish requirements regarding payment of the nonFederal share of the costs of wetlands conservation 

projects in Canada that are funded under that Act, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3433 IH

1 SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARE OF 

2 PROJECTS IN MEXICO AND CANADA UNDER 

3 NORTH AMERICAN WETLANDS CONSERVA4 TION ACT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8(b)(3) of the North 

6 American Wetlands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 

7 4407(b)(3)) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(3) The non-Federal share of the United States con9 tribution to the costs of such projects may not be derived 

10 from Federal grant programs. In the case of a project car11 ried out in Canada or Mexico, the non-Federal share of 

12 the costs of the project may include cash contributions 

13 from non-United States sources that are used to pay costs 

14 of the project. In the case of a project carried out in Can15 ada, funds from Canadian sources may comprise up to 50 

16 percent of the non-Federal share of the costs of the 

17 project.’’. 

18 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub19 section (a) shall apply with respect to any approved and 

20 active wetlands conservation project (as that term is used 

21 in section 8(b)(1) of such Act) carried out with assistance 

22 provided under such Act, including such a project ap23 proved before the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS