alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3137 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide clarification relating to the authority of the United States Postal 

Service to accept donations as an additional source of 

funding for commemorative plaques. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3137 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DONATIONS FOR COMMEMORATIVE PLAQUES. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 401(7) of title 39, United 

3 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘business;’’ and in4 serting ‘‘business, including monetary donations made (in 

5 such manner as the Postal Service may prescribe) for the 

6 funding of plaques in connection with the commemorative 

7 designation of postal facilities;’’. 

8 (b) DESIGNATIONS.—The donor of a monetary dona9 tion described in the amendment made by subsection (a) 

10 may specify the postal facility with respect to which such 

11 donation is to be used. 

12 (c) REQUIREMENT.—The United States Postal Serv13 ice shall provide for a suitable plaque, in the case of any 

14 postal facility which has been designated by law to com15 memorate a particular individual, no later than 120 days 

16 after the date as of which— 

17 (1) a law has been enacted providing for the 

18 designation of the postal facility involved; and 

19 (2) sufficient amounts have been received, in 

20 the manner described in subsection (b), to provide 

21 for such plaque. 

22 Any donations received by the Postal Service under sub23 section (b) in excess of the total amount needed in order 

24 to provide for a suitable plaque may, with the consent of 

25 the donors involved, be used for the funding of a plaque 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3137 RFS 

1 in the case of any other postal facility as to which a law 

2 (as described in paragraph (1)) has been enacted. 

3 (d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec4 tion shall be considered— 

5 (1) to affect the authority of the United States 

6 Postal Service with respect to any requirements con7 cerning the design, placement, and limitation on 

8 costs relating to commemorative plaques (as de9 scribed in the preceding provisions of this section), 

10 so long as such requirements are applied in a uni11 form manner; or 

12 (2) to limit, supersede, or render inapplicable 

13 any other authority or duty which (but for this Act) 

14 the United States Postal Service would otherwise 

15 have had with respect to the commemorative des16 ignation of a facility or the funding, commissioning, 

17 or installation of a plaque in connection with such 

18 a designation. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS








I, Ron Carte, certify that:





1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Zenex International, Inc.;2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.


****Date: March 31, 2005
By:
/s/ Ron CarteRon CarteChief Executive Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3267 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide relief with respect 

to the children of members of the Armed Forces of the United States 

who die as a result of service in a combat zone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2009 

Mr. MEEK of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

relief with respect to the children of members of the 

Armed Forces of the United States who die as a result 

of service in a combat zone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3267 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN CHILD CREDIT WITH RESPECT TO 

2 CHILDREN OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

3 FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES WHO DIE AS 

4 A RESULT OF SERVICE IN A COMBAT ZONE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 24 of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to allowance of 

7 credit) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There shall be allowed as a 

10 credit against the tax imposed by this chapter for 

11 the taxable year with respect to each qualifying child 

12 of the taxpayer for which the taxpayer is allowed a 

13 deduction under section 151 an amount equal to 

14 $1,000. 

15 ‘‘(2) INCREASE IN CREDIT IN CASE OF MEMBER

16 OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO DIES AS A RESULT OF

17 SERVICE IN A COMBAT ZONE.—In the case of tax18 payer— 

19 ‘‘(A) whose deceased spouse is an indi20 vidual to whom section 692(a) (relating to gen21 eral rule for income taxes of members of armed 

22 forces on death) applies, 

23 ‘‘(B) with respect to whom the qualifying 

24 child is a child (as defined in section 152(f)(1)) 

25 of such deceased spouse, and 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3267 IH

1 ‘‘(C) who, as of the close of the taxable 

2 year, has not remarried after the death of such 

3 deceased spouse, 

4 paragraph (1) shall be applied with respect to such 

5 qualifying child by substituting ‘$5,000’ for 

6 ‘$1,000’.’’. 

7 (b) AGI LIMITATION NOT APPLICABLE.—Subsection 

8 (b) of section 24 of such Code (relating to limitations) is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(4) AGI LIMITATION NOT APPLICABLE TO IN11 CREASED CREDIT AMOUNT WITH RESPECT TO CER12 TAIN DECEASED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED

13 FORCES.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the por14 tion of the credit amount allowable under subsection 

15 (a) by reason of paragraph (2) thereof.’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments allowed by 

17 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

18 December 31, 2008. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00353-CR

EX PARTE John Matthew GAMBOA

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1992CR4978-W1

Honorable Andrew Wyatt Carruthers, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the habeas court’s denial 

of Appellant John Matthew Gamboa’s Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

SIGNED December 10, 2014.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3346 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3346

   To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to permit the sharing of 
  confidential supervisory information with foreign auditor oversight 
                                bodies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2009

 Mr. Frank of Massachusetts (for himself and Mr. Kanjorski) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to permit the sharing of 
  confidential supervisory information with foreign auditor oversight 
                                bodies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO SHARE CERTAIN INFORMATION.

    (a) Definition.--Section 2(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 
U.S.C. 7201(a)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (16) the 
following:
            ``(17) Foreign auditor oversight authority.--The term 
        `foreign auditor oversight authority' means any governmental 
        body or other entity empowered by a foreign government to 
        conduct inspections of public accounting firms or otherwise to 
        administer or enforce laws related to the regulation of public 
        accounting firms.''.
    (b) Availability To Share Information.--Section 105(b)(5) of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7215(b)(5)) is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Availability to foreign oversight 
                authorities.--When in the Board's discretion it is 
                necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Act or to 
                protect investors, and without the loss of its status 
                as confidential and privileged in the hands of the 
                Board, all information referred to in subparagraph (A) 
                that relates to a public accounting firm within the 
                inspection authority, or other regulatory or law 
                enforcement jurisdiction, of a foreign auditor 
                oversight authority may be made available to the 
                foreign auditor oversight authority if the foreign 
                auditor oversight authority provides such assurances of 
                confidentiality as the Board determines appropriate.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 105(b)(5)(A) of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7215(b)(5)(A)) is amended by striking 
``subparagraph (B)'' and inserting ``subparagraphs (B) and (C)''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.47


July 8, 2004


Billy Banker


Dear Billy,

RE:      EMPLOYEE SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN AND EMPLOYEE SHARE OPTION PLAN

In accordance with the Employee Share Incentive Plan ("the Preference Share
Plan"), you are hereby advised that the Grant Date is July 6, 2004 for benefits
you have accrued during the year ended 31 December 2003.

Accordingly you are granted 116 Preference Shares in the Company. You have the
option to purchase an equal number of Preference Shares at a price of US$13.45
or CI$11.21 each, which has been calculated in accordance to the terms of the
Preference Share Plan. If you intend to exercise this option, then payment must
be received in full no later than the close of business on AUGUST 5, 2004.

As a member of the Employee Share Option Plan ("the Option Plan"), you will also
be granted, as of July 6, 2004, the option to purchase 580 Ordinary Shares in
the Company. These options are exercisable in accordance to the terms of the
Option Plan. You furthermore have the opportunity to obtain an equal amount of
options to purchase Ordinary Shares of the Company, in accordance to the terms
of the Option Plan, if you exercise your right to purchase the above additional
Preference Shares before AUGUST 5, 2004.

Your continued dedication and hard work have contributed to another successful
year for Consolidated Water, and I look forward to a very bright future.

Yours sincerely,
CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD.


/s/ Frederick W. McTaggart

Frederick W. McTaggart
President and CEO
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Montes CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50147.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 16, 2011.

Bryan F. Boutwell, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Riverside, CA, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Tanaka, Deputy Federal Public Defender, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Antonio Montes Castro appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Castro’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief have been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
connection with this Quarterly Report of River
Hawk Aviation, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Robert J.
Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of River Hawk Aviation, Inc.
  Date: May
12, 2008
 By: /s/
      Robert J. ScottRobert
      J. ScottChief
      Financial OfficerPrincipal
      Financial Officer,
Director
Exhibit 32.1



TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.



OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



August 21, 2003



The undersigned Robert M. McMurrey duly appointed and incumbent officer of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the
Corporation), in connection with the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended May 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), does hereby
represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Corporation.



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/    ROBERT M.
MCMURREY               
|Robert M. McMurrey Chairman of the Board



August 21, 2003
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jack L. Alexander,  Senior Vice President of MidAmerican  Energy Company (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company  for the annual  period
          ended  December  31,  2002  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated:   March 25, 2003




                                               /s/  Jack L. Alexander
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Jack L. Alexander
                                               Senior Vice President
                                               (co-chief executive officer)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22498]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9969-52-OA]


Notice of Meeting of the EPA Children's Health Protection 
Advisory Committee (CHPAC)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, notice is hereby given that the next meeting of the Children's 
Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) will be held November 29 
and 30 at The George Washington University Milken Institute School of 
Public Health 950 New Hampshire Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20052. The 
CHPAC advises the Environmental Protection Agency on science, 
regulations, and other issues relating to children's environmental 
health.

DATES: November 29 and 30 at The George Washington University Milken 
Institute School of Public Health in Washington, DC.

ADDRESSES: 950 New Hampshire Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20052.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Hackel, Office of Children's 
Health Protection, USEPA, MC 1107T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566-2977 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f373e3c343a33713e31383a333e1f3a2f3e71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9c1c8cac2ccc587c8c7ceccc5c8e9ccd9c887cec6df">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meetings of the CHPAC are open to the 
public. An agenda will be posted to epa.gov/children.
    Access and Accommodations: For information on access or services 
for individuals with disabilities, please contact Angela Hackel at 202-
5566-2977.

    Dated: October 2, 2017.
Angela Hackel,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 2017-22498 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2487
CHARLES ALSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA JUDICIARY SYSTEM, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-03-410-A) Submitted: February 19, 2004 De cided: February 24, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Alston, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Charles Alston appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Alston v. Virginia Judiciary Sys. , No. CA-03-410-A (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 16, 2003 & entered Oct. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

    Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quick-Med Technologies, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Nam
H. Nguyen, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: February 11, 2005


/s/ Nam H. Nguyen
---------------------------
Nam H. Nguyen
Chief Financial Officer