alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|    |                                                                                                                                          |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Pillarstone Capital REIT (the “Registrant”); and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Date:  | April 3, 2017 | By: |   | /s/ John J. Dee |
|   |   |   |   | John J. Dee |
|   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President |
|   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-97450, No.33-86116, 333-14601 and No. 333-48446) on Form S-8 of PVF Capital Corp. of our report dated August24, 2005, relating to the consolidated statement of financial condition of PVF Capital Corp. andsubsidiaries as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 which reportappears in the June 30, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of PVF Capital Corp.     Crowe Chizek and Company LLCCleveland, Ohio
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7352
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL A. HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-1, CA-968-4) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 29, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214, and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harris , Nos. CR-93-1; CA-968-4 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 1996; July 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00560

- CR
Jorge Enrique Guerrero

- Acosta v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 277th District Court of Williamson County , Texas Trial Cause No. 16

- 0434

- K277

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having co nsidered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with i ts opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. November 8, 2018
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

THOMAS G. CURRY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3196

[January 9, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 432006CF001743A.

Thomas Curry, Jasper, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Rosario, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 136]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered May 31, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 8 to 16 years, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly closed the courtroom during the undercover officer’s testimony based on her hearing testimony that she continued to participate in undercover operations in the area of defendant’s arrest, had approximately 10 ongoing investigations in the area, had previously encountered threatening behavior by drug dealers stemming from her undercover work and feared for her safety if the courtroom remained open during her testimony *(People v Ayala,*90 NY2d 490; *People v Martinez,*82 NY2d 436). Moreover, since defense counsel never suggested any reasonable alternatives to closure, the trial court was not required to consider any *{People v Ayala, supra).*

The record fails to support defendant’s claim that the People deviated from the court’s *Sandoval*ruling. In any event, to the extent that the People’s cross-examination of defendant could be viewed as deviating from the *Sandoval*ruling, defendant opened the door thereto (see, *People v Melendez,*55 NY2d 445).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin, Williams and Colabella, JJ.

22
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00153-CV

IN RE ALVIE ROBINSON

Original Proceeding

ORDER

Relator, Alvie Robinson, requests in his Motion for Suspension of Appellate 

Rules, filed on June 26, 2014, that this Court suspend the Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 9.3(a) requirement to file multiple copies of his pleadings in this proceeding. 

Relator had previously filed a similar motion, which was granted by this Court on June 

4, 2014, specific only to his Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Relator’s motion, filed on June 26, 2014, was not served. A copy of all documents 

presented to the Court must be served on all parties to the proceeding and must contain 

proof of service. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5. This requirement includes original proceedings 
In re Robinson Page 2

such as this. However, we use Rule 2 to dispense with the service requirement for this 

motion and grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. 

We remind relator that all future documents must be served on all parties to the 

proceeding. A copy of a document to be served is not required to be produced by 

machine; the copy served may be a duplicate hand-written copy.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed December 31, 2014
#### YAGMAN & YAGMAN & REICHMANN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

No. 07-74834.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed Dec. 31, 2007.

Stephen Yagman, Marion R. Yagman, Joseph Reichmann, Yagman *&*Yagman *&*Reichmann, Venice Beach, CA, for Petitioners.

Richard Drooyan, Paul Watford, Mun-ger, Tolies & Olson, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent.

*522Before: ALFRED T. GOODWIN, STEPHEN REINHARDT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

We have reviewed the petition for writ of mandamus, the supplement thereto, the district court’s response and petitioner’s replies. In its response to the petition, the district court conceded that, given the plain language of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2)(D), it may mandate electronic filing only if it allows attorneys to opt out of receiving service electronically, and represented that it has taken steps to amend its rules accordingly. Therefore, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.

Petitioner’s third, fourth and fifth replies present matters that were not addressed in the original petition or in the district court’s response. Accordingly, those matters are not properly before this court, but may be raised subsequently in an appropriate proceeding.

We grant petitioner’s motion for costs. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 39(a). Petitioner may submit a bill of costs, and the district court may oppose it, pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 39-1. We direct the Appellate Commissioner to determine the amount of the award. *See*9th Cir. R. 39-1.9.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22975]



[[Page 49233]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-458-LR, ASLBP No. 17-956-01-LR-BD01]


Entergy Operations, Inc.; Establishment of Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission, see 37 FR 28,710 (Dec. 
29, 1972), and the Commission's regulations, see, e.g., 10 CFR 2.104, 
2.105, 2.300, 2.309, 2.313, 2.318, 2.321, notice is hereby given that 
an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established to 
preside over the following proceeding:

Entergy Operations, Inc.

(River Bend Station, Unit 1)

    This proceeding involves an application by Entergy Operations, Inc. 
to renew for twenty years its operating license for River Bend Station, 
Unit 1, located in St. Francisville, Louisiana. The current operating 
license for River Bend Station, Unit 1, expires on midnight, August 29, 
2025. In response to a notice published in the Federal Register, see 82 
FR 37,908 (Aug. 14, 2017), announcing the opportunity to request a 
hearing, the Sierra Club on October 12, 2017 filed a petition to 
intervene and request for a hearing.
    The Board is comprised of the following Administrative Judges:

E. Roy Hawkens, Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dr. Michael F. Kennedy, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dr. Richard E. Wardwell, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule. See 10 CFR 2.302.

    Rockville, Maryland, October 18, 2017.
Edward Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2017-22975 Filed 10-23-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 731-TA-313-314, 317, and 379 (Fourth Review)]

      ( print page 48724)    
                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on brass sheet and strip from France, Germany, Italy, and Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted these reviews on March 1, 2017 (82 FR 12238) and determined on June 5, 2017 that it would conduct expedited reviews (82 FR 32871, July 18, 2017).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on October 13, 2017. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4733 (October 2017), entitled                     *Brass Sheet and Strip from France, Germany, Italy, and Japan: Investigation Nos. 731-TA-313-314, 317, and 379 (Fourth Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: October 13, 2017.

Jessica Mullan,

Attorney Advisor.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2017-22653 Filed 10-18-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

I, Robert M. McMurrey, Chairman of the Board of Teletouch Communications, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Teletouch Communications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 30, 2004
Exhibit 13.1



Section 906 Certificate



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Justin
Gover, Chief Executive Officer of GW Pharmaceuticals plc, a public limited company incorporated under English law (the
“company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended September 30, 2016 (the “Form 20-F”) of the company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: December 5, 2016



| | /s/ Justin Gover       
| | -----------------------
| | Justin Gover           
| | Chief Executive Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3280 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a grant program 

to assist veterans in highly rural areas by providing transportation to 

medical centers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2009 

Mr. RODRIGUEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a 

grant program to assist veterans in highly rural areas 

by providing transportation to medical centers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRANSPORTATION GRANTS FOR RURAL VET4 ERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS. 

5 (a) GRANTS AUTHORIZED.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans 

7 Affairs shall establish a grant program to provide in8 novative transportation options to veterans in highly 

9 rural areas. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3280 IH

1 (2) USE OF FUNDS.—Grants awarded under 

2 this section may be used by State veterans service 

3 agencies and veterans service organizations to— 

4 (A) assist veterans in highly rural areas to 

5 travel to Department of Veterans Affairs med6 ical centers; and 

7 (B) otherwise assist in providing medical 

8 care to veterans in highly rural areas. 

9 (3) MAXIMUM AMOUNT.—The amount of a 

10 grant under this section may not exceed $50,000. 

11 (4) NO MATCHING REQUIREMENT.—The recipi12 ent of a grant under this section may not be re13 quired to provide matching funds as a condition for 

14 receiving such grant. 

15 (5) RECOVERY OF UNUSED GRANT FUNDS.—If 

16 a recipient of a grant does not use the full amount 

17 of funds received under this section by not later 

18 than September 30 of the fiscal year in which such 

19 grant was awarded, the United States shall be enti20 tled to recover from such recipient the total of all 

21 unused grant amounts made under this section to 

22 such recipient. 

23 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall prescribe 

24 regulations for— 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3280 IH

1 (1) evaluating grant applications under this sec2 tion; and 

3 (2) otherwise administering the program estab4 lished by this section. 

5 (c) REPORTS.—Not later than February 1 of each 

6 year, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report con7 taining information related to each grant awarded under 

8 this section during the preceding year, including— 

9 (1) the name of the grant recipient; and 

10 (2) the amount of the grant. 

11 (d) VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATION DEFINI12 TION.—In this section, the term ‘‘veterans service organi13 zation’’ means any organization recognized by the Sec14 retary of Veterans Affairs for the representation of vet15 erans under section 5902 of title 38, United States Code. 

16 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

17 are authorized to be appropriated $3,000,000 for each of 

18 fiscal years 2009 through 2013 to carry out this section. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                                 iVideoNow, Inc.
                        383 Inverness Parkway, Suite 100
                               Englewood, CO 80112


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In Connection with the quarterly  report of iVideoNow,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I Kevin R.  Keating,
President of the Company,  certify, to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







                             /s/  Kevin  R.  Keating
                             --------------------------------
                             Kevin  R.  Keating
                             President and Chief Financial Officer
                             iVideoNow,  Inc.

                             November 10, 2003



                                       13