alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21****CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD. AND RELATED COMPANIES****Affiliates of the Registrant**     The following list includes all of the Registrant’s wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliatesas of December 31, 2005. All subsidiaries of the Registrant appearing in the following table areincluded in the consolidated financial statements of the Registrant.   Affiliates Jurisdiction of IncorporationBelize Water Limited (100%) BelizeCayman Water Company Limited (100%) Cayman IslandsDesalCo Limited (100%) Cayman IslandsDesalCo (Barbados) Ltd. (100%) BarbadosOcean Conversion (Cayman) Limited (100%) Cayman IslandsWaterfields Company Limited (90.9%) Commonwealth of The BahamasAquilex, Inc. (100%) United StatesOcean Conversion (BVI) Ltd. (Affiliate) The British Virgin Islands
#### Kyle JIGGETTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRISTAR PATROL SERVICE, INC., Special Service Bureau, Defendants-Cross-Claimants, NYC Department of City wide Administration Services, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-3765-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 23, 2011.

Kyle Jiggetts, New York, NY, pro se.

Susan Paulson, Assistant Corporation Counsel, New York City Law Department, New York, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: RALPH K. WINTER, ROSEMARY S. POOLER, B.D. PARKER, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Appellant, *pro se,*appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Ap-pellee, and dismissing his discrimination and retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e *et seq.*(“Title VII”); the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621*et seq.*(“ADEA”); and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12112*et seq.*(“ADA”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, proceedings below, and specification of issues on appeal.

We review an order granting summary judgment *de novo*and ask whether the *26district court- properly concluded that there were no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. *See Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P.,*321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir.2003). In determining whether there are genuine issues of material fact, we are “required to resolve all ambiguities and draw all permissible factual inferences in favor of the party against whom summary judgment is sought.” *Terry v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 128, 137 (2d Cir.2003) (quotation marks omitted). However, “conclusory statements or mere allegations [are] not sufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion.” *Davis v. New York,*316 F.3d 93, 100 (2d Cir. 2002).

Having conducted an independent and *de novo*review of the record in light of these principles, we affirm the district court’s judgment for substantially the same reasons stated by the magistrate judge in his thorough and well-reasoned report and recommendation.

We have considered Appellant’s other arguments on appeal and have found them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET/STATEMENT OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      32,008,412
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,473,011
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                  0
<PP&E>                                       5,590,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,537,135
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                   3,398,135
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       257,028
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,149,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,537,613
<TRADING-REVENUE>                           12,077,940
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           734,549
<COMMISSIONS>                                        0
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                  242,727
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<COMPENSATION>                                 966,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,791,964)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 (3,791,964)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,791,964)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



MAPCO EXPRESS, INC., as BorrowerBy:
    /s/ Ed MorganName:
    Ed MorganTitle:
    CFOBy:
    /s/ Uzi YeminName:
    Uzi YeminTitle:
    PresidentLEHMAN COMMERCIAL PAPER INC., as
Administrative AgentBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



MAPCO EXPRESS, INC., as BorrowerBy:Name:Title:By:Name:Title:LEHMAN COMMERCIAL PAPER INC., as
Administrative AgentBy:
    /s/ V. Paul ArzouianName:
    V. Paul ArzouianTitle:
    Authorized Signatory




---



##### 



ANNEX I
    $5,000,000
    
    New York, New York , 2005
 Borrower Swing Line Lender
 prima facie
 Credit
Agreement




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



MAPCO EXPRESS, INC.By:Name:Title:By:Name:Title:




---



##### 



ANNEX I
 
 LOANS AND REPAYMENTS OF SWING LINE LOANS
 Amount of Principal of
    
    Unpaid Principal BalanceAmount of
    
    Swing Line
    
    of SwingDate
    
    Swing Line Loans
    
    Loans Repaid
    
    Line Loans
    
    Notation Made By




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
  Amendment Credit Agreement Borrower Lenders Arranger Syndication
Agent Co-Administrative Agent Administrative Agent




---



##### 



DELEK US HOLDINGS, INC.By:Name:Title:By:

/s/
Edward MorganName:Title:MAPCO EXPRESS, INC.By:Name:Title:By:

/s/ Edward MorganName:Title:




---



##### 



GASOLINE ASSOCIATED SERVICES, INC.By:Name:Title:By:

/s/ Edward MorganName:Title:LIBERTY WHOLESALE CO., INC.By:Name:Title:By:

/s/ Edward MorganName:Title:WILLIAMSON OIL CO., INC.By:Name:Title:By:

/s/ Edward MorganName:Title:




---



##### 



EXHIBIT B
 
 To:
    
    Lehman Commercial Paper Inc.,
as Administrative Agent
745 Seventh Avenue
Bank Loans  16th Floor New York, New York 10019 Attn: Brian McNany
  Credit Agreement Borrower Lenders Arranger Syndication Agent Co-Administrative Agent Administrative
Agent
 Amendment




---



##### 



Very truly yours,
       
(NAME OF LENDER)By:Name:Title:




---



##### 



LEHMAN COMMERCIAL PAPER INC., as Administrative AgentBy:Name:Title:
    Authorized Signatory
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the annual report of AGR Tools, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  December 29, 2011





By:           /s/ John Kuykendall________


John Kuykendall


Chief Financial Officer
#### Armando De Jesus HERNANDEZ-RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70660.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 24, 2011.

Gabriela Kreutzer, Esquire, Principal Litigation Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Charles Canter, Tim Ramnitz, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Armando De Jesus Hernandez-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo constitutional and legal issues. Avi*la-Sanchez v. Mukasey,*509 F.3d 1037, 1039-40 (9th Cir.2007). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Hernandez-Ramirez contends the BIA abused its discretion and violated due process by failing to provide him with a full copy of the transcript prior to issuing its decision. Contrary to Hernandez-Ramirez’s contention, the proceedings were not “so fundamentally unfair that [he] was prevented from reasonably presenting his case.” *Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000) (citation omitted). Moreover, Hernandez-Ramirez failed to demonstrate that review of the missing transcript pages may have affected the outcome of the proceedings. *See id.*(requiring prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge).

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Hernandez-Ramirez’s October 2002 motion to reopen because he did not satisfy the procedural requirements set forth in *Matter of Lozada,*19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988), and the alleged ineffectiveness is not plain on the face of the record. *See Tamang v. Holder,*598 F.3d 1083, 1090-91 (9th Cir.2010).

Hernandez-Ramirez contends he was unable to comply with the *Lozada*requirements because of the ineffective assistance of his counsel. This contention lacks merit because prior counsel did not represent him on appeal to the BIA.

*750We lack jurisdiction to review Hernandez-Ramirez’s contention that the IJ erred in finding his motion to reopen to be number-barred. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

Hernandez-Ramirez’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3455 

To make available funds from the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act 

of 2008 for funding a voluntary employees’ beneficiary association with 

respect to former employees of Delphi Corporation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2009 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio (for himself, Mr. MCCOTTER, Ms. SUTTON, Mr. BOCCIERI, 

Mr. KUCINICH, Ms. KILROY, Mr. WILSON of Ohio, and Ms. KAPTUR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Education and 

Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To make available funds from the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 for funding a voluntary employees’ 

beneficiary association with respect to former employees 

of Delphi Corporation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DELPHI CORPORATION VEBA. 

4 (a) FUNDING OF VEBA.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—To the extent of the funding 

6 made available under subsection (b), the Secretary 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3455 IH

1 of the Treasury shall enter into an agreement with 

2 a volunteer employees’ beneficiary association (with3 in the meaning of section 501(a)(9) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986) that is established— 

5 (A) after the date of the enactment of this 

6 Act, and 

7 (B) for the benefit of eligible separated 

8 employees (and their dependents), 

9 to transfer amounts to such association for purposes 

10 of establishing, or obtaining coverage under, a health 

11 care plan for the benefit of such employees (and de12 pendents). 

13 (2) ELIGIBLE SEPARATED EMPLOYEE.—For 

14 purposes of this section, the term ‘‘eligible separated 

15 employee’’ means any individual— 

16 (A) who is separated from employment 

17 with Delphi Corporation before the date of the 

18 enactment of this Act, and 

19 (B) with respect to whom the obligation of 

20 Delphi Corporation or General Motors Corpora21 tion to provide health care coverage has been 

22 discharged in a proceeding under title 11, 

23 United States Code. 

24 (b) FUNDING.—Of the amounts made available under 

25 title I of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3455 IH

1 2008 (Public Law 110–343; 12 U.S.C. 5201 et seq.), the 

2 Secretary of the Treasury shall make available such 

3 amounts as are necessary to provide (to the extent prac4 ticable) health care coverage that is substantially the same 

5 as the coverage the obligation for which was so discharged, 

6 but not to exceed $3,000,000,000. Such amount shall be 

7 treated as having been made available for activities au8 thorized by such Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) Parsons Government Services, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 61306, 61307 61308,61309 ) ) Under Contract Nos. DACA87-97-D-0008 ) DAAA09-03-D-0023 ) DE-AC09-02SR22210 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: Kevin J. Slattum, Esq. Aaron S. Ralph, Esq.

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Los Angeles, CA E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Carol L. Matsunaga, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Carson, CA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 1March 2018

dministratlve Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANos. 61306, 61307, 61308, 61309, Appeals of Parsons Government Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Opinion i ssued December 5 , 201 3

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

NO . 01

- 13

- 00751

- CR

____________ CHRISTOPHER DAIDE LEVERON, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178 t h District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No

. 1360798

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Counsel for appellant, Christopher Daide Leveron, has filed a motion to

dismiss the appeal. The motion attaches a letter signed by appellant indicating he
no longer wishes to pursue this appeal, which we find in compliance with Texas2

Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2 (a). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). We have not

issued a decision in the appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss
any pending motions as moot.
We direct the Clerk to issue the mandate within 10 days of the date of this
opinion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 18.1.

P ER CURI A M

Panel consists of Justice s Jennings, Sharp and Brown

. Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b).
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3250 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1210 West Main Street in Riverhead, New 

York, as the ‘‘Private First Class Garfield M. Langhorn 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3250 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS GARFIELD M. 

2 LANGHORN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1210 West Main Street in 

5 Riverhead, New York, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Private First Class Garfield M. Langhorn Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Private First Class 

12 Garfield M. Langhorn Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 21, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3157 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3157

    To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
 Alexandria, Minnesota, as the ``Max J. Beilke Department of Veterans 
                      Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2009

 Mr. Peterson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
 Alexandria, Minnesota, as the ``Max J. Beilke Department of Veterans 
                      Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 
              ALEXANDRIA, MINNESOTA.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Alexandria, 
Minnesota, expected to open in September 2009, shall after the date of 
the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the ``Max J. 
Beilke Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''. Any 
reference to such outpatient clinic in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be 
considered to be a reference to the Max J. Beilke Department of 
Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

                           INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
                              A Nevada Corporation

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Investment Associates, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Steve Khan, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and Robert Hemmerling,
Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated May 21, 2004                      /s/ Steve Khan
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Steve Khan,
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Robert Hemmerling
                                        ---------------------
                                        Robert Hemmerling,
                                        Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 202 (Friday, October 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900 253G]


Indian Gaming; Approval of an Amendment to a Tribal-State Class 
III Gaming Compact in the State of Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe and State of Washington 
negotiated the Sixth Amendment to the Tribal State Compact for Class 
III Gaming between the Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe and the State of 
Washington governing Class III gaming; this notice announces approval 
of the amended Compact.

DATES: The compact takes effect on October 20, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
Act (IGRA) requires the Secretary of the Interior to publish in the 
Federal Register notice of approved Tribal-State compacts that are for 
the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. 
See Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. All Tribal-State Class 
III compacts, including amendments, are subject to review and approval 
by the Secretary under 25 CFR 293.4. The Sixth Amendment to the Tribal 
State Compact for the Class III Gaming between the Jamestown S'Klallam 
Tribe and the State of Washington supersedes and replaces the previous 
compact, revises the definition section, allows for an additional 
gaming facility, increases the number of gaming stations, and provides 
for Satellite (Off-Track) wagering on Horse Races. Licensing and 
registration requirements have been updated. The Tribe is required to 
establish a problem-gambling education and awareness program and to 
provide information about education, awareness, and treatment program 
services in a community and contributions report. The Sixth Amendment 
to the Tribal State Compact for the Class III Gaming between the 
Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe and the State of Washington is approved. See 
25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(A).

    Dated: September 22, 2017.
Michael S. Black,
Acting Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2017-22852 Filed 10-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P