alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE                Exhibit 10.15

$200                                                      Date: April 12, 2000


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  NextNet.com,  Inc., the undersigned ("Payor"),  hereby
promises to pay to the order of Zamora Funding, Inc., an individual, ("Holder"),
the principal  amount of $200.00  payable twenty four (24) months after the date
first set forth above. The principal amount hereof from time to time outstanding
shall bear  interest at the rate of six percent  (6%) per annum,  payable on the
date set forth  above.  All payments  hereunder  shall be in lawful money of the
United  States of America at the address of the Holder hereof or at such address
as shall be specified by the Holder to NextNet.com, Inc.

     If any default shall be made in the payment of interest or principal,  then
the Holder, by written notice to the Payor, may exercise all of its legal rights
to collect  the  balance due unless  within  five (5)  business  days after such
notice the default  shall be cured by Payor.  Such notice  shall be deemed given
three (3) days after having been  deposited in the United  States Mail  properly
addressed  and  sent by  registered  mail to the  particular  addressee,  return
receipt requested.

     Prepayments may be made in this note  voluntarily at any time and from time
to time, without penalty.



                                                     NextNet.com, Inc.


                                                     BY:/s/Larry Weinstein
                                                     ---------------------
                                                           Larry Weinstein
                                                           President

                                        2
Exhibit 99.2

|Exhibit
Number |  |  |  | 
|-------------- |  |  |  | 
|99.2           |  |  |  | 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectrum Bancorporation, Inc ("Spectrum") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James R. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of Spectrum, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



/s/JAMES R. CLARKJames R. Clark,
Chief Financial Officer


---

QuickLinks
#### Marie B. Bachman, Respondent, v Town of North Hempstead, Defendant, and Thomas Russo et al., Appellants.

[665 NYS2d 100]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Thomas Russo and Pamela Russo appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated May 7, 1997, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendants Thomas Russo and Pamela Russo.

The plaintiff tripped and fell on a raised concrete flag in the public sidewalk in front of the residence of the defendants Thomas Russo and Pamela Russo, which is located in the Town of North Hempstead.

It is well settled that a landowner will not be liable to a pedestrian injured by a defect in a public sidewalk abutting the landowner’s premises unless the landowner created the defective condition, or caused the defect to occur because of some special use, or unless a statute or ordinance placed the obligation to maintain the sidewalk upon the landowner and expressly made the landowner liable for injuries occasioned by the failure to perform that duty *(Hausser v Giunta,*88 NY2d 449, 453; *Eidelman v Hochauser,*242 AD2d 596; *Strauss v Tam Tam Inc.,*231 AD2d 564; *Figueroa v City of New York,*227 AD2d 373; *Rosales v City of New York,*221 AD2d 329).

No statute or ordinance imposes liability on the abutting *328landowners, the defendants Thomas Russo and Pamela Russo, in this case. Moreover, they made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment by submitting an affidavit by Pamela Russo in which she indicated that neither she nor her husband ever repaired the sidewalk, that they never hired anyone to make repairs to the sidewalk, and that they do not maintain any special use of the sidewalk in the area where the plaintiff alleged she had fallen *(see, Figueroa v City of New York, supra,*at 373; *Rosales v City of New York, supra,*at 329; *see also, Carbone v Pathrose,*236 AD2d 352).

We find no merit to the plaintiffs remaining contentions. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Santucci and Luciano, JJ., concur.

*4*
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3243 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3243

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
  any hours worked by Federal firefighters under a qualified trade-of-
   time arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations 
                       relating to overtime pay.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF HOURS WORKED UNDER A TRADE-OF-TIME 
              ARRANGEMENTS.

    Section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any 
hours worked by a firefighter under a qualified trade-of-time 
arrangement shall be disregarded for purposes of any determination 
relating to eligibility for or the amount of any overtime pay under 
this section.
    ``(2) For purposes of this section--
            ``(A) the term `qualified trade-of-time arrangement' means 
        an arrangement under which 2 firefighters who are employed by 
        the same agency agree, solely at their option and with the 
        approval of their employing agency, to substitute for one 
        another during scheduled work hours in performance of work in 
        the same capacity; and
            ``(B) the term `firefighter' has the meaning given such 
        term by sections 8331(21) and 8401(14), respectively.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30 
      (legislative day September 29), 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3243

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
  any hours worked by Federal firefighters under a qualified trade-of-
   time arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations 
                       relating to overtime pay.
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49034-49035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22863]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Performance Review Board Members

    Title 5, U.S.C. Section 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service Reform Act 
of 1978, Public Law 95-454, requires that the appointment of 
Performance Review Board Members be published in the Federal Register. 
The following persons may be named to serve on the Performance Review 
Boards or Panels, which oversee the evaluation of performance 
appraisals of Senior Executive Service members of the Department of 
Health and Human Services.

Employee Name

Barry, Daniel
Barlow, Amanda
Coughlin, Janis
Fantinato, Jessica
Gentile, John
Johnson, Jeffrey
Katz, Ruth
Kretschmaier, Michon
Lewis, Lisa
McDaniel, Eileen
Novy, Steve
Sample, Allen
Skeadas, Christos
Tobias, Constance
Weber, Mark


[[Page 49035]]


    Dated: October 16, 2017.
Charles H. McEnerney III,
Director, Executive and Scientific Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-22863 Filed 10-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151-17-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3386 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 206
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3386

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                            November 4, 2009

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1165 2nd Avenue in Des Moines, Iowa, as the ``Iraq and Afghanistan 
                    Veterans Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1165 2nd Avenue in Des Moines, Iowa, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans Memorial Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Iraq and 
Afghanistan Veterans Memorial Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 206

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3386

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1165 2nd Avenue in Des Moines, Iowa, as the ``Iraq and Afghanistan 
                    Veterans Memorial Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 4, 2009

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of G+G Retail, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 2, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay
Galin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


/s/ Jay Galin
__________________________________
Jay Galin
Chief Executive Officer
December 16, 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of G+G Retail, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 2, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Kaplan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


/s/ Michael Kaplan
__________________________________
Michael Kaplan
Chief Financial Officer
December 16, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Ethan D. Hokit, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Military Resale Group, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2004 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                                        By: /s/ Ethan D. Hokit
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Ethan D. Hokit
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

December 17, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Military Resale Group, Inc. and will be retained by Military Resale
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

                                 END OF FILING
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The
undersigned, David C. Nolan, is the Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant). This statement is
being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010
(the Report).

By
execution of this statement, I certify that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | A) | the Report fully
 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and                                                                 
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | B) | the information
 contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of the
 dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended
that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request

|                      |                                                      | 
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: August 13, 2010 | /s/ David C. Nolan                                   | 
|                      |                                                      | 
|                      | David C. Nolan                                       | 
|                      | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

KIMBERLY S. CLARK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

No. 95-2607

E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND

COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.

James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge.

(CA-94-67-H)

Submitted: May 16, 1996

Decided: May 30, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Kerry Dane Armentrout, GREEN & O'DONNELL, Harrisonburg,

Virginia, for Appellant. Eva S. Tashjian-Brown, MCGUIRE,

WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia;

Bruce M. Steen, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE,

L.L.P., Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Kimberly Clark appeals from the district court's order dismissing

her employment discrimination suit, 42 U.S.C.A § 2000e (West

1994), for failure to serve the Defendant within 120 days as required

by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Clark filed her complaint on September 20,

1994. However, the Defendant was not served until February 15,

1995, approximately 150 days later. Clark did not file a motion to

extend the time for effecting service until after the Defendant filed a

motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to timely serve under Rule

4(m). The district court denied Clark's motion for an extension and

granted the Defendant's motion to dismiss. We affirm.

Rule 4(m) requires that if the complaint is not served within 120

days after it is filed, the complaint must be dismissed absent a showing of good cause. Mendez v. Elliot, 45 F.3d 75, 78 (4th Cir. 1995).

"Both Rule 4(m) and Rule 6(b) allow the district court discretion to

extend the time for service." Id. at 79. If the request is made after the

expiration of the 120-day period, the moving party must show that the

failure to act "was the result of excusable neglect." Fed. R. Civ. P.

6(b).

Clark's only excuse for her failure to timely serve the Defendant

was that she relied on a commercial process server"but for reasons

unknown to [her], service was not made." (Brief of Appellant, p. 6).

Moreover, Clark's motion for enlargement of time was not filed until

five months after the expiration of the 120-day limit. We agree with

the district court's conclusion that Clark failed to establish either good

cause for her failure to comply with Rule 4(m) or excusable neglect

entitling her to an extension under Rule 6(b). Accordingly, we affirm.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
NO. 07-02-0233-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JULY 17, 2002

	______________________________

	MINERVA ARENIVAR, APPELLANT

	V.

	PROVIDIAN NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF MOORE COUNTY;

	NO. CL-113-98; HONORABLE DELWIN MCGEE, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	Appellant Minerva Arenivar appealed from a summary judgment based on a sworn account entered in favor of appellee Providian National Bank.  She filed a timely notice of appeal on May 20, 2002.  However, appellant has now filed a motion in which she asks this court to dismiss the appeal.  

	Because appellant has complied with the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2), we hereby grant her motion to dismiss.  Furthermore, having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

							John T. Boyd

							 Chief Justice

Do not publish.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001088691
<NAME> TXU EUROPE LIMITED
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> UK POUND STERLING

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  0.684
<CASH>                                             231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      574
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         97
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,050
<PP&E>                                           3,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                     351
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,206
<BONDS>                                          4,447
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               95
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,467
<OTHER-SE>                                         307
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,885
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,985
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,686
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (76)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    142
<INCOME-TAX>                                        57
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 85
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            7
<NET-INCOME>                                        76
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>