alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-15-00415-CV 

________________________

MATTHEW BAUMAN, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC., APPELLEE 

 

 

On Appeal from the 223rd District Court 

Gray County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 37,512; Honorable Phil N. Vanderpool, Presiding 

 

December 7, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant, Matthew Bauman, gave notice of appeal from the trial court’s 

summary judgment in favor of Appellee, Aldridge Electric, Inc. By letter dated 

November 4, 2015, the clerk of this court advised Bauman that a filing fee of $205 was 

overdue and notified him that failure to submit payment within ten days would subject 

the appeal to dismissal pursuant to Rule 42.3(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure.
2

Bauman has not responded, paid the filing fee, nor made other arrangements for 

the discharge of the filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b). Unless a party is excused 

from paying a filing fee, the clerk of this court is required to collect filing fees set by 

statute or the Texas Supreme Court when an item is presented for filing. See id. at 5, 

12.1(b). Although the filing of a proper notice of appeal invokes an appellate court’s 

jurisdiction, if a party fails to follow the prescribed rules of appellate procedure, the 

appeal may be dismissed. Id. at 25.1(b).

Accordingly, having provided Bauman a reasonable opportunity to cure this 

defect, this appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate 

rules and failure to comply with a notice from the clerk requiring action within a specified 

time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

Per Curiam
WMPH 4 Stock Speciman


    EXHIBIT
      4.1



    COMMON
      STOCK COMMON STOCK



    NUMBER
      [LOGO OF WMPH 4, INC. APPEARS HERE] SHARES 


    INCORPORATED
      UNDER THE LAWS SEE REVERSE FOR OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

     

     


    THIS
      CERTIFIES THAT



    IS
      THE
      OWNER OF



    FULLY
      PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR

    VALUE
      $.001 PER SHARE OF

    WMPH
      4,
      INC. (the "Corporation") transferable on the books of the Corporation by the
      holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this
      certificate properly endorsed. This certificate and the shares represented
      hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of the
      Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws and amendments thereto of the
      Corporation, to all of which the holder by acceptance hereof assents. The
      certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and
      registered by the Registrar.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3243 

To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 

any hours worked by Federal firefighters under a qualified trade-oftime arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations relating to overtime pay. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2009 

Mr. SARBANES (for himself and Mr. GALLEGLY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to 

provide that any hours worked by Federal firefighters 

under a qualified trade-of-time arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations relating to overtime pay. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF HOURS WORKED UNDER A 

4 TRADE-OF-TIME ARRANGEMENTS. 

5 Section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3243 IH 

1 ‘‘(g)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this 

2 section, any hours worked by a firefighter under a quali3 fied trade-of-time arrangement shall be disregarded for 

4 purposes of any determination relating to eligibility for or 

5 the amount of any overtime pay under this section. 

6 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this section— 

7 ‘‘(A) the term ‘qualified trade-of-time arrange8 ment’ means an arrangement under which 2 fire9 fighters who are employed by the same agency 

10 agree, solely at their option and with the approval 

11 of their employing agency, to substitute for one an12 other during scheduled work hours in performance 

13 of work in the same capacity; and 

14 ‘‘(B) the term ‘firefighter’ has the meaning 

15 given such term by sections 8331(21) and 8401(14), 

16 respectively.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Filed 9/20/02 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2002 ND 150

Keith O. Andes, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

Billy G. Brogdin and

PC Transport, Inc., Defendants and Appellees

No. 20020047

Appeal from the District Court of Bowman County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Allan L. Schmalenberger, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

T.L. Secrest, Secrest Law Firm, P.O. Box 430, Hettinger, ND 58639-0430, for plaintiff and appellant.

Lyle W. Kirmis, Zuger Kirmis & Smith, P.O. Box 1695, Bismarck, ND 58502- 1695, for defendants and appellees.

Andes v. Brogdin

No. 20020047

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Keith O. Andes appealed the trial court judgment dismissing his negligence suit against Billy Brogdin and PC Transport, Inc.  Andes sued for the damages he incurred after encountering the scene of an accident involving Brogdin’s overturned pup trailer, which was leaking a cloud of isobutane gas.  The trial court found that Andes was 50 percent at fault based on his own negligent actions of driving so close to the accident after seeing the cloud from about one-half mile away and jack-knifing his semi tractor and trailer when he backed up in a panic.   Andes contends his actions do not correspond to a finding of 50 percent contributory fault.

[¶2]Under N.D.C.C. § 32-03.2-02, the trial court dismissed Andes’s action because it found his degree of fault equaled Brogdin’s.  We summarily affirm the trial court judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

William A. Neumann

Dale V. Sandstrom
EXHIBIT 32






WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH RULE 13a-14(b)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.




In connection with the Annual Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VI (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge, that: (a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/Kimberly A. Springsteen-AbbottKimberly A. Springsteen-AbbottChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 31, 2011
Order filed September 20, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 00856

- CV

____________ SHARON ANN GRIBBLE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER CAPACITY AS GUARDIAN OF THE PERS ON AND ESTATE OF MIC HAEL RAY GRIBBLE , Appellant
V.

BRENT ALL EN LAYTON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 306th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09FD0426



### O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 30, 2011. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial. The notice of appeal wa s due September 28, 2011, ninety days after the judgment was signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant filed the notice of appeal on September 29, 2011, one day late. Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. See Tex. R . App. P. 26.3. A motion to extend time is

A necessarily implied @ when the perfecting instrument is filed within fifteen days of its due
date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). While an extension may be2

implied, appellant is still obligat ed to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

C Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Appellant filed a motion to extend time deadlines to de termine indigency and for filing the reporter’s record , which this court granted . The motion contained a reasonable explanation for the late determination of appellant’s indigency , if any, and the need for additional time to file the reporter’s record

. The motion did not expressly refer to the late

filed notice of appeal, however. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal containing a reasonable explanation for the late filing within 15 days
of the da te of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; 10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, the court will consider dismissal of the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

Securities Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert J. Nikl, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Verigy Ltd.; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                          
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 25, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    Robert J. Nikl                                    
|                        |  |  |  | Robert J. Nikl
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Tyner *vs.*Slappey.

[Jackson, C. J., not presiding, on account of providential cause.]

If tlie relation of landlord and tenant existed at the date when an obligation for rent was incurred, the fact that such relation ceased before the landlord proceeded to enforce his claim by distress warrant, would not affect his right so to do, or render such proceeding illegal.

Judgment affirmed.

October 2, 1884.

Blandeord, Justice.

[Slappey sued out a distress warrant against Tyner. The latter defended, on the ground that the relation of landlord and tenant had ceased to exist before the warrant was sued out. From an adverse ruling in the superior court, he excepted.]
IB 

House Calendar No. 104 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3193 

[Report No. 111–245] 

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 South 

United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ‘‘Alto Lee Adams, 

Sr., United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2009 

Mr. ROONEY (for himself, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. MACK, Mr. CRENSHAW, 

Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. KLEIN

of Florida, and Mr. HASTINGS of Florida) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2009 

Additional sponsors: Mr. PUTNAM and Mr. YOUNG of Florida 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3193 RH

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, 

Florida, as the ‘‘Alto Lee Adams, Sr., United States 

Courthouse’’. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3193 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse under construction at 

5 101 South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Alto Lee Adams, 

7 Sr., United States Courthouse’’. 

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

11 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

12 to be a reference to the ‘‘Alto Lee Adams, Sr., United 

13 States Courthouse’’. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 104 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3193 

[Report No. 111–245] 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse under 

Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse’’. 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ‘‘Alto Lee construction at 101 South United States Route 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
```

Exhibit 10.9

                       **Terms for a Distribution Agreement
                Between Noville and Quick-Med Technologies, Inc.**

                              November 17th, 2003

1.   Noville will provide to QMT technical and scientific support services and
     infrastructure for developing its NIMBUS technology as one or more Products
     to be sold within the Business. Such services will include:
     o    Pilot plant facilities for developing products (in South Plainfield,
          NJ)
     o    Office space and support in Noville's New Jersey Headquarters
     o    Scientific assistance including application chemists and other
          technical support for performing product research and development

2.   If a product that has been developed is viable for marketing and
     distribution, Noville will either manufacture the Product or cause it to be
     manufactured to suitable specifications.

3.   Noville will provide the the business and professional services for
     developing the Business. Such services shall include:
     o    Marketing and sales support
     o    Distribution in the personal care industry
4.   The Business shall include:
     o    Personal care
     o    Oral care
     o    Household care
     o    Environmental
5.   Products shall be any new or enhanced product using QMT's NIMBUS technology
     or derivatives thereof.
6.   Noville shall have the exclusive right to represent and develop NIMBUS in
     the Business for a period of at least 5 years.
7.   Noville will pay all costs associated with research and development of the
     products while receiving technical assistance from QMT. If Noville does not
     possess the laboratory or technology to perform the required  development,
     then Noville will pay for such services from QMT at QMT's cost at
     $12,000/month.
8.   The net profits from the Business (defined as net revenues less cost of
     goods sold and other direct expenses) shall be split (50%/50%) by the
     parties.
9.   This agreement is effective as of December 1, 2003 and will be reviewed
     annually by the parties.

For Noville:                            For Quick-Med Technologies:

/s/Daniel J. Carey                      /s/Michael R. Granito
Date: Nov 17, 03                        Date: Nov 17, 2003
```
** **

**Exhibit 15.1**

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

**To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of GW Pharmaceuticals plc**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatement No. 333-217329 on Form F-3 of our reports dated December 4, 2017,relating to the consolidated financial statements of GW Pharmaceuticals plc, and the effectiveness of GW Pharmaceuticals plc’sinternal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of GW Pharmaceuticals plc for the yearended September 30, 2017.

 

/s/ Deloitte LLP

 

London, United Kingdom

December 4, 2017

 

** **
EX-35 (c)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 12, 2007

Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.
11 Madison Ave
4th Floor
New York, ny 10010

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for CSMC Mortgage-Backed Trust Series
2006-1

Per Section 14.06 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 1/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or
     such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer, has
     been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
     applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer, in all material
     respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there has been a
     failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifying
     each such failure known to such officer and the nature and status thereof.




Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1


HAROLD Y. SPECTOR, CPA          SPECTOR & WONG, LLP         80 SOUTH LAKE AVENUE
CAROL S. WONG, CPA          Certified Public Accountants    SUITE  723
                                  (888) 584-5577            PASADENA, CA 91101
                               FAX (626) 584-6447


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT FIRM

We consent to the use of our report dated November 2, 2005, on the consolidated
financial statements of Ingen Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary, for the years
ended May 31, 2006 and 2005.

We consent to the incorporation by reference or as an exhibit in any
Registration Statement or periodic reporting from on EDGAR, such as, but not
limited to, Form 10-KSB, of the aforementioned report and to the use of our name
as it appears below under the caption of "Experts" in any such Registration
Statement or periodic reporting form.


/s/  Harold Spector, CPA

Spector & Wong, LLP
Pasadena, California
August 4, 2006
#### In the Matter of Shirley Liverman, Petitioner, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[988 NYS2d 178]

Determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA), dated September 12, 2012, terminating petitioner’s tenancy, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Cynthia S. Kern, J.], entered May 15, 2013), dismissed, without costs.

The determination that petitioner violated stipulations requiring her to permanently exclude her grandson from the subject apartment is supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Gibbs v New York City Hous. Auth.,*82 AD3d 412 [1st Dept 2011]). The record shows that petitioner permitted two NYCHA investigators into her apartment pursuant to the stipulations’ provisions for unannounced visits to confirm petitioner’s compliance with the permanent exclusion, and that the grandson was found in the apartment’s living room and admitted to having been in apartment for over four hours by the time the investigators arrived.

Under the circumstances presented, including that petitioner violated at least three exclusion stipulations dating back to 2006, the penalty of termination does not shock our sense of *581fairness *(see Matter of Horne v New York City Hous. Auth.,*113 AD3d 575 [1st Dept 2014]; *Gibbs,*82 AD3d at 413; *Matter of Wooten v Finkle,*285 AD2d 407, 408-409 [1st Dept 2001]).

Concur—Tom, J.E, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending November 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren F. Kruger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








February 9, 2012
/s/ Warren F. Kruger


Warren F. Kruger


President and Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part of the Report.
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

December 11, 2015

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 14-1745

LINDA REED, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

.

STATE OF ILLINOIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees

. Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 1:12-cv-07274

Amy St. Eve, Judge

.

O R D E R

The majority opinion in Reed v. State of Illinois , Seventh Circuit No. 14-1745, decided October 30, 2015, is amended as follows to correct an error (brought to the court's attention by counsel) in the original opinion: the first full pa ragraph on page 11 of the majority opinion, the paragraph beginning "And to top it all," is deleted in its entirety. There are no other changes in the majority opinion, and there are no changes in the dissenting opinion.

So ordered.