alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit Number 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great Western Bancorporation, Inc. (Great Western) on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James R. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of Great Western, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Great Western.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ James R. Clark     
|James R. Clark,        
|Chief Financial Officer
[No. 42813-0-II.

Division Two.

October 30, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. E.W., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 11-8-00594-7, Barbara D. Johnson, J., entered October 31, 2011. *Dismissed*by unpublished opinion per

Van Deren, J,

concurred in by Johanson, A.C.J., and QuinnBrintnall, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 325 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 325

     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
participate in the Avra/Black Wash Reclamation and Riparian Restoration 
                                Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2009

 Mr. Grijalva introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
participate in the Avra/Black Wash Reclamation and Riparian Restoration 
                                Project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Avra/Black Wash Reclamation and 
Riparian Restoration Project''.

SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) In General.--The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (Public Law 102-575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et 
seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 16__. AVRA/BLACK WASH RECLAMATION AND RIPARIAN RESTORATION 
              PROJECT, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with Pima 
County, Arizona, may participate in the planning, design, and 
construction of water recycling facilities and to enhance and restore 
riparian habitat in the Black Wash Sonoran Desert ecosystem in Avra 
Valley west of the metropolitan Pima County area.
    ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the cost of 
the project.
    ``(c) Limitation.--Federal funds provided under this section shall 
not be used for operation or maintenance of the project described in 
subsection (a).
    ``(d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $14,000,000.
    ``(e) Use of Funds.--Federal funds provided under this section 
shall only be used for the design, planning and construction of water-
related infrastructure.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for Public Law 102-
575 is amended by inserting after the last item relating to title XVI 
the following:

``Sec. 16__. Avra/Black Wash Reclamation and Riparian Restoration 
                            Project, Pima County, Arizona.''.
                                 <all>
```
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Tzell Airtrak Travel Group Corporation ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W91QUZ-07-D-0020 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 57313 

Josephine L. Ursini, Esq. 

Law Office of Josephine L. Ursini 

Williamsburg, VA 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Joseph K. Venghaus, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 19 June 2014 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 57313, Appeal ofTzell Airtrak 

Travel Group Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
EX-10.13



 Exhibit 10.13 

English Translation 

Guarantee Letter 

Hailiang Finance Co., Ltd. (“Hailiang Finance”), a finance company of enterprise group incorporated with the approval by the China
Banking Regulatory Commission and registered with the State Administration for Industry & Commerce of the People’s Republic of China under the Business License for Enterprise Legal Person numbered 330681000148272, is entitled to provide
financial services for the members of Hailiang Group1. Hailiang Group Co., Ltd. (the “Group”) guarantees that Zhuji Hailiang Foreign Language School, Zhuji Private High School and
Zhejiang Zhuji Tianma Experimental School (the “Three Schools”) will be able to recover their deposits at Hailiang Finance and any interest accrued thereupon in accordance with the deposit contracts. In the event that the Three Schools
fail to recover all such deposits and accrued interest, the Group shall assume irrevocable joint and several responsibilities for the repayment thereof. 

This Guarantee Letter shall constitute a legally binding document on the Group. In case of any breach of this Guarantee Letter, the Group is
willing to assume any legal liabilities as a result thereof. 
 Hailiang Group Co., Ltd. 

Seal of Hailiang Group Co., Ltd. affixed 

29 September 2014 
  

	1 	Hailiang Group Member Entities shall refer to the enterprises, public institutions or social associations duly registered in the People’s Republic of China, connecting with one another by capital, and operating
with the parent company as the main body and pursuant to Hailiang Group’s Articles of Association as the common codes of conduct, which include the parent company and its subsidiaries with no less than 51% of controlled shares; the companies
whose no less than 20% of shares are individually or jointly held by the parent company and any of the subsidiaries, or whose less than 20% of shares are individually or jointly held by the parent company and any of the subsidiaries as the largest
shareholder; and the public institutions or social associations affiliated to the parent company and/or any of the subsidiaries. During the actual process of execution, Hailiang Group Member Entities also include the branches, subsidiaries and
affiliated public institutions or social associations controlled by the actual controller, Hailiang Feng, whose status is the same as a parent company. Zhuji Hailiang Foreign Language School, Zhuji Private High School and Zhejiang Zhuji Tianma
Experimental School are Hailiang Group Member Entities.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Bernard Liautaud, and I, James R. Tolonen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Business Objects S.A. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Business Objects S.A. Date:  March 16, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Bernard LiautaudBernard LiautaudChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDate:       March 16, 2005
    By:
    /s/ James R. TolonenJames R. TolonenChief Financial Officer and Senior Group Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,500
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,191
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    16,193
<OTHER-SE>                                 (45,943)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,500
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 24.1
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
    /s/ Ezra Uzi YeminEzra Uzi YeminDate: March 8, 2011/s/ Gabriel LastGabriel LastDate: March 8, 2011/s/ Asaf BartfeldAsaf BartfeldDate: March 8, 2011/s/ Aharon KacherginskiAharon KacherginskiDate: March 8, 2011/s/ Sholmo ZhoharSholmo ZhoharDate: March 8, 2011/s/ Philip L. MaslowePhilip L. MasloweDate: March 8, 2011/s/ Charles H. LeonardCharles H. LeonardDate: March 8, 2011/s/ Carlos E. JordáCarlos E. JordáDate: March 8, 2011
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Ortel Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-
91182 and 33-87540) on Forms S-8 of Ortel Corporation of our report dated May
30, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Ortel Corporation and
subsidiaries as of April 30, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended April 30, 1997, and the related schedule,
which report appears in the April 30, 1997, annual report on Form 10-K of Ortel
Corporation.



                                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Los Angeles, California

                                      55
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48308-48309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10170]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Object Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: ``Laura Owens'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that a certain object to be included in the exhibition 
``Laura Owens,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within 
the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at 
the Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, New York, from on or 
about November 10, 2017, until on or about February 4, 2018, at the 
Dallas Museum of Art, Dallas, Texas, from on or about March 25, 2018, 
until on or about July 29, 2018, at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Los 
Angeles, in Los Angeles, California, from on or about November 1, 2018, 
until on or about March 31, 2019, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
information identifying the object, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office 
of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-
6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85f6e0e6f1eceaebb7b1b0bcc5f6f1e4f1e0abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="36455355425f59580402030f76454257425318515940">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat.

[[Page 48309]]

985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs 
Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 
U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 
1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as 
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 11, 2015). I 
have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in 
the Federal Register.

Alyson Grunder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-22456 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3301 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the alternative 

tax liability limitation for small property and casualty insurance companies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2009 

Mr. POMEROY (for himself and Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the alternative tax liability limitation for small property 

and casualty insurance companies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LIMITATION FOR ALTERNATIVE 

4 TAX LIABILITY FOR SMALL PROPERTY AND 

5 CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 831(b)(2)(A) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

8 as follows: 

9 ‘‘(i) the net written premiums (or, if 

10 greater, direct written premiums) for the 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3301 IH

1 taxable year do not exceed $2,025,000, 

2 and’’. 

3 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Paragraph (2) of sec4 tion 831(b) of such Code is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following new subparagraph: 

6 ‘‘(C) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the 

7 case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar 

8 year after 2010, the dollar amount set forth in 

9 subparagraph (A) shall be increased by an 

10 amount equal to— 

11 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

12 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de13 termined under section 1(f)(3) for such 

14 calendar year by substituting ‘calendar 

15 year 2009’ for ‘calendar year 1992’ in sub16 paragraph (B) thereof. If the amount as 

17 adjusted under the preceding sentence is 

18 not a multiple of $1,000, such amount 

19 shall be rounded to the next lowest mul20 tiple of $1,000.’’. 

21 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

22 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

23 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
!"
#$
%$
%$%

 
&'
 
 &
 

!"
#$
%$
%$%(








'

)

'**(+,- 






7KH +RQRUDEOH $YHUQ &RKQ 6HQLRU 

WKH (DVWHUQ 'LVWULFW RI 0LFKLJDQ VLWWLQJ 




5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//

3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUF

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )

)LOH 1DPH D

	


*.+/0)1(2/0

555555555555

41,7(' 17$7(6 2) 0(5,&$

	



6$55< 0 )':$5'6

		

41

18


		
9:; 31

 =1

8
*=&

>=84;0/+)?;(

3.018

555555555555




	  + ) +  8  >1//)1 //.+)? 3
# 	

	
 	


 
  + ) +  +& .   8  > 11(1// 4(/)81//)1//.+)?3.







,+/03+(; 84;0/+)?3
 <   /

6) 
 

  
&      
  
  -
  1  

 
  
 &

A
&

. )  
  & 
  
'&

	
		
		

/
B
&


    )   
       
       
  &
 &   4 1 C(
=

60)
,
+

8&   
 D 
     E    /
F
3.

8 )  
 8& 



 D   &
8&  )     
D

D


	
     

&!)

 

A#A#$93%
#!)

H
I%&   
 -   E )B 
D  

  / 
 


 

   

B



   

)


 


&
&


     


&F

 

&
  C
D&D

 
  
   

86 6(17(1

!"
#$
%$
%$%

')




 
   

H0
!"
#$
%$
% !"

$
%B
 
    0&    F 
9 	

	
 	


&&

 

D +18  
 &    
   

    
   + 1  & 
 +1& D 


*-
C1+





&       * F  C'& 

&
3

 B 
 -
      & &
3

   
     
;&
E



/D     B 

 


  
 


  /   
  
& &C.
30
-
E 
&  
      
  
&
/  3      & 



(   
 
B    


 


)B 
 
     
 8&  1
  
D  
  &     	  & 

  !AJ

  $ 
 % 

	
 


 

8 )  


 KL&    

D   )  8
 

8 ) D



&.F,

			

. 
			

8&#,.60)D +1

& D E 
& 

EE
*
 
 &
  

 
 

-



     
 &



)B

 A
 
 
  & &   

" 	

	
 	


M#9
	&

)F
 






( &  
      


& H
      
  1
 ;-
N
B&I	

##

* GA
 GA9 $9 3 #%  H6  

 &

( 

D   & 
   
 
B

&


&
1

)

-   
    &  



& F&=

  &
@            &

&&& &@    
   ) @
 )B
 -

&
&
-

413!
A
#$%$%

)& -

 &   
  
 
  )B&



>

 


-

 &

-


 -  &  #  -  








)B
 

&



&&


	
 

8 )  


  &


&!)

;  >
   



B


 	#	$93
		"%,&        	

"$93
		A%

(   )  




=

(  
   

3
(
  F   
, &  .   
 
  8
,8&


8&B   ( 
  B 
B ,8  
   8&B -





/


   
  &.
    8    &
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7854

CARL DWIGHT KNOTT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH P. SACCHET; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-01-

2047-MJG)

Submitted: February 12, 2002 Decided: February 28, 2002

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Dwight Knott, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Carl Dwight Knott seeks to appeal the district court’s order

extending the time in which the Respondents could respond to the

order to show cause as to Knott’s petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292 (1994); Fed. R.

Civ. P. 54(b). See also Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337

U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order

nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal

as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eural Warren, Jr., Appellant.

[667 NYS2d 582]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 265.01 [2]). Upon our review of the record, we conclude.that the conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence and that the verdict is not contrary to the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). Although the victim was punched and knocked down by another person after being beaten by defendant with a blunt instrument, the victim’s death was not solely attributable to the second assailant *(see, Matter of Anthony M.,*63 NY2d 270, 280; *People v Stewart,*40 NY2d 692, 697). Medical testimony established that the victim died from the cumulative effect of several skull fractures, only one of which was caused by the second assailant. “[DJefendant’s conduct was an actual cause of death, in the sense that it forged a link in the chain of causes which actually brought about the death” *(People v Stewart, supra,*at 697). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the medical examiner should not have been permitted to testify regarding the manner of death *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to address that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). We further conclude that defendant received meaningful representation *(see, People v Satterfield,*66 NY2d 796, 798-799; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147) and that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Brunetti, J.—Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Wisner and Boehm, JJ.