UNITED STATES
                             SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                   WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                                          FORM 10-K


  (Mark one)

  /X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
      For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

      OR



  / / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


       Commission file number:  333-123741-15

       ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-SL1
       (exact name of issuing entity as specified in its charter)

       ACE Securities Corp.
       (exact name of the depositor as registrant on behalf of the issuing
       entity as specified in its charter)

       DB Structured Products, Inc.
       (exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)


  Delaware                                          06-1442101
  (State or other jurisdiction of                   Depositor
  incorporation or organization)                    (I.R.S. Employer
                                                    Identification No.)


   ACE Securities Corp.
   6525 Morrison Boulevard Suite 318
   Charlotte, NC                                 28211
  (Address of principal executive offices)    (Zip Code)


  Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (704) 365-0569


  Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

        NONE.


  Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

        NONE.


  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer,
  as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

        Yes  ___     No  X


  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
  pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

        Yes  ___     No  X


  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
  required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
  that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
  subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

        Yes  X       No  ___


  Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
  Item 405 of Regulation S-K ( 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained
  herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge,
  in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference
  in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

        Not applicable.


  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
  an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
  "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the
  Exchange Act. (Check one):


  Large accelerated filer ___  Accelerated filer ___  Non-accelerated filer X


  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
  defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

        Yes  ___     No  X


  State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
  equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which
  the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of
  such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most
  recently completed second fiscal quarter.

        Not applicable.


     Documents Incorporated by Reference

  List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and
  the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the
  document is incorporated: (1)Any annual report to security holders; (2)
  Any proxy or information statement; and (3)Any prospectus filed pursuant
  to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed
  documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g.,
  annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

        Not applicable.


                                   PART I
  Item 1.  Business.

            Omitted.


  Item 1A.  Risk Factors.

            Omitted.


  Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments.

            None.


  Item 2.  Properties.

            Omitted.


  Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.

            Omitted.


  Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

            Omitted.


                                PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder
         Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

            Omitted.


  Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.

            Omitted.


  Item 7.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
           Results of Operations.

            Omitted.


  Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

            Omitted.


  Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

            Omitted.


  Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
           Financial Disclosure.

            Omitted.


  Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

            Omitted.


  Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures.

            Omitted.


  Item 9B. Other Information.

            None.


                                PART III

  Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

            Omitted.


  Item 11. Executive Compensation.

            Omitted.

  Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
           Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

            Omitted.


  Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
           Independence.

            Omitted.


  Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

            Omitted.



            ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS PURSUANT TO GENERAL INSTRUCTION J

  Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information.

            None.


  Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Credit Enhancement and Other Support,
             except for certain Derivative Instruments (Information regarding
             Significant Enhancement Providers Financial Information).

            No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external
            credit enhancement, uses any derivative instruments or other support
            for the certificates within this transaction as described under
            Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.

  Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain Derivative Instruments.

            The significance percentage related to each entity or group of
            affiliated entities providing derivative instruments described in
            Item 1115 of Regulation AB is less than 10%.

  Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.

            New Century Financial Corporation

            DOL Investigation. On August 2, 2004, the U.S. Department of Labor,
            Wage and Hour Division, or DOL, informed New Century  Mortgage
            Corporation ("New Century Mortgage"), an indirect wholly owned
            subsidiary of New Century Financial Corporation (the "Company"),
            that it is conducting an investigation to determine whether New
            Century Mortgage is in compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act,
            or FLSA. The DOL narrowed the scope of its investigation to
            overtime compensation paid to retail loan officers in an Irvine,
            California operation. New Century Mortgage believes it is in
            compliance with the FLSA and that it properly pays overtime wages.
            In April 2005, New Century Mortgage provided requested documents
            and awaits a response from the DOL.

            Rubio. In March 2005, Daniel J. Rubio, a former retail loan officer
            of New Century Mortgage, filed a class action complaint against
            New Century Mortgage in the Superior Court of Orange County,
            California. The complaint alleges failure to pay overtime wages,
            failure to provide meal and rest periods, and that New Century
            Mortgage engaged in unfair business practices in violation of the
            California Labor Code. The complaint seeks recovery of unpaid wages,
            interest, and attorneys' fees and costs. New Century Mortgage filed
            a motion to strike and demurrer to the complaint in May 2005. On
            July 8, 2005, the court overruled the demurrer and granted the
            motion to strike. A First Amended Complaint was filed in July 2005
            and New Century Mortgage filed its answer in August 2005. In
            December 2005, New Century Mortgage filed a motion to strike
            portions of the complaint, which was granted in New Century
            Mortgage's favor, limiting the statute of limitations for
            plaintiff's meal and rest period claims to one year. The court
            reconsidered and reversed its ruling in May 2006. A Second Amended
            Complaint was filed by plaintiff, adding a cause of action for
            failure to pay overtime in violation of the FLSA. In July 2006,
            mediation occurred, followed by New Century Mortgage's removal of
            the case to the United States District Court, Central District of
            California in August 2006. In September 2006, the court granted
            New Century Mortgage's motion to strike, limiting the statute of
            limitations for plaintiff's meal and rest period claims to one
            year. Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint was filed in October 2006.
            In December 2006, the Court granted New Century Mortgage's motion
            to strike the punitive damages allegations from the plaintiff's
            Third Amended Complaint and denied New Century Mortgage's motion
            to dismiss the sixth cause of action for alleged wage statement
            violations.  In December 2006, the parties stipulated to plaintiff
            filing a Fourth Amended Complaint adding plaintiffs John Hicks
            and David Vizcarra.

            Bonner. In April 2005, Perrie Bonner and Darrell Bruce filed a
            class action lawsuit against New Century Mortgage and Home123
            Corporation, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
            ("Home123") in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of
            Indiana, Hammond Division, alleging violations of the Fair Credit
            Reporting Act, or FCRA, claiming that New Century Mortgage and
            Home123 accessed consumer credit reports without authorization
            because the prescreened offers of credit did not qualify as firm
            offers of credit. New Century Mortgage and Home 123 filed their
            answer to the complaint on June 30, 2005. In September 2005,
            plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification and on November
            1, 2005, New Century Mortgage and Home123 filed a motion for
            judgment on the pleadings. The court never ruled on the motion for
            judgment on the pleadings. In August 2006, the court granted
            plaintiffs' motion for class certification. The class size is
            limited to the Northern District of Indiana. On December 13, 2006,
            the court heard oral argument in Indiana on the parties' summary
            judgment motions. On March 9, 2007, the court ruled on the motion
            for summary judgment that defendants' solicitation did not
            constitute a "firm offer of credit", and ruled that plaintiff
            Bonner's claim that the disclosure was not "clear and conspicuous"
            was moot. On March 12, 2007, this action settled on a class-wide
            basis (Northern District of Indiana). On March 16, 2007, the
            parties moved for preliminary approval of the settlement. The court
            has not yet ruled on the motion.

            Phillips. In July 2005, Pamela Phillips filed a class action
            lawsuit against the Company, New Century Mortgage and Home123 in
            the District Court, Central District of California.  Plaintiff
            alleges violations of FCRA, claiming that the Company, New Century
            Mortgage and Home123 accessed consumer credit reports without
            authorization because the prescreened offers of credit did not
            qualify as firm offers of credit. The case also alleges that
            certain disclosures were not made in a clear and conspicuous manner.
            The complaint seeks damages of not more than $1,000 for each
            alleged violation, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, attorneys'
            fees and costs. The Company, New Century Mortgage and Home123 filed
            a motion to dismiss certain claims in October 2005. In November
            2005, the court granted the motion to dismiss, in part. In early
            March 2006, the court, on its own motion, reversed its prior ruling
            on the motion to dismiss citing the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals
            recent decision in the Murray v. GMAC Mortgage Corporation case. On
            November 14, 2006, plaintiff filed a Motion for Class Certification
            proposing that the class be limited to all individuals throughout
            Harris County, Texas whose consumer reports were obtained or used
            by New Century Mortgage or Home123 in connection with a credit
            transaction not initiated by them and who received the same written
            solicitation to entered into a credit transaction received by
            plaintiff. In late December 2006, plaintiff filed a Third Amended
            Complaint to limit the class size to Harris County, Texas. On
            January 22, 2007, the Company, New Century Mortgage and Home123
            filed their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Class
            Certification. On January 31, 2007, the Company, New Century
            Mortgage and Home123 filed a Motion to Stay. On February 22, 2007,
            the court denied the Motion to Stay. On March 11, 2007, this action
            settled. The parties agreed to dismissal with prejudice of
            individual claims and dismissal without prejudice of claims of
            putative class members.

            Jeppesen. In October 2005, Patricia and Stephen Jeppesen filed a
            class action lawsuit against New Century Mortgage in the U.S.
            District Court, Northern District of Indiana. Plaintiffs allege
            that New Century Mortgage violated the Indiana High Cost Loan Act
            by allegedly making loans with fees greater than permitted by law
            unless certain disclosures are made. The class is defined as all
            persons who obtained a mortgage loan from New Century Mortgage
            after January 1, 2005 on their principal residence in Indiana. A
            second claim in the complaint alleges that New Century Mortgage
            improperly charged a document preparation fee. On January 12, 2007,
            the Office of the Attorney General, State of Indiana, issued a
            no-action letter and, in response to a letter dated September 19,
            2005 from plaintiff's counsel about alleged violations of the
            Indiana Home Loan Practices Statute, concluded its inquiry and
            declined to take any action against New Century Mortgage. In
            February 2007, the parties reached a settlement on an individual
            basis. On February 14, 2007, the court entered an order dismissing
            this case and approving the Stipulation of Dismissal.

           Forrest. In January 2006, Mary Forrest filed a class action lawsuit
           against New Century Mortgage in the U.S. District Court for the
           Eastern District of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Division. Plaintiff alleges
           violations of FCRA, claiming that New Century Mortgage accessed
           prescreened credit reports without authorization because the offers
           of credit allegedly did not qualify as firm offers of credit. The
           proposed class consists of persons with Wisconsin addresses to whom
           New Century Mortgage sent a particular prescreened offer of credit
           after November 20, 2004. In February 2006, New Century Mortgage
           filed both its answer and a motion to transfer the case to the
           U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. In June
           2006, the court granted New Century Mortgage's motion to transfer
           and ordered the case transferred from the U.S. District Court in
           Wisconsin to the U.S. District Court, Central District of California.
           In July 2006, New Century Mortgage filed a Notice of Related Case to
           consolidate this matter with the Phillips class action. On March 11,
           2007, this action settled. On March 20, 2007, a stipulation for
           dismissal of individual claims dismissed with prejudice and claims
           of putative class members dismissed without prejudice was filed with
           the court.

           Securities Class Action Litigation

           On February 8, 2007, Avi Gold filed a securities class action
           complaint in the United States District Court for the Central
           District of California against the Company and certain of its
           directors and officers (the "Original Complaint"). The Original
           Complaint alleges that defendants violated federal securities laws
           by issuing false and misleading statements and failing to disclose
           material facts about the Company, which resulted in artificially
           inflated market prices of the Company's common stock. The purported
           class period is between April 7, 2006 and February 7, 2007. The
           Original Complaint seeks money damages in favor of its purported
           class of purchasers of the Company's securities, the costs and
           expenses of the action and other relief that may be granted by the
           court.

           The Company has also learned that seventeen additional purported
           class actions were filed in the United States District Court for the
           Central District of California between February 8, 2007 and March 16,
           2007. These complaints, some of which the Company has not yet been
           served with and which name the Company and certain of its officers
           and directors as defendants, present in large degree the same legal
           and factual issues as the Original Complaint and allege various
           class periods, the longest of which is from April 7, 2006 to March 2,
           2007. One of these class actions has been brought on behalf of the
           holders of the Company's 9.125% Series A Cumulative Redeemable
           Preferred Stock ("Series A Preferred Stock") and the holders of the
           Company's  9.75% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
           ("Series B Preferred Stock"). Another of these class actions has
           been brought on behalf of the holders of the Company's Series B
           Preferred Stock. The Company anticipates that similar actions on
           behalf of holders of the Company's common stock, Series A Preferred
           Stock and Series B Preferred Stock may be filed in the future and
           does not undertake any obligation to update this disclosure for any
           similar or related claims that may be made in this regard. The
           Company intends to review the allegations in these complaints and
           respond appropriately. The Company's management intends to
           vigorously defend these claims; however, an unfavorable outcome in
           these cases or future securities class action cases could have a
           material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition.

           Shareholder Derivative Complaint
           The Company was served with a shareholder derivative complaint on
           March 1, 2007, filed in the Superior Court of California, County of
           Orange. The complaint alleges breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of
           control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, unjust
           enrichment, and violations of California Corporations Code 25402 and
           seeks damages for breach, disgorgement, equitable relief, costs and
           fees. The case is in the very preliminary stages. The Company has
           also learned that five additional shareholder derivative actions
           were filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange
           between February 8, 2007 and March 16, 2007 and two additional
           shareholder derivative actions were filed in the United States
           District Court for the Central District of California during this
           same time period. These complaints, some of which the Company has
           not yet been served with and which name the Company and certain of
           its officers and directors as defendants, present in large degree
           the same legal and factual issues as the original shareholder
           derivative complaint. The Company anticipates that similar actions
           may be filed in the future and does not undertake any obligation to
           update this disclosure for any similar or related claims that may be
           made in this regard. The Company intends to review the allegations
           in these complaints and respond appropriately.

           U.S. Attorney's Office Investigation

           On February 27, 2007, the Company received a letter from the United
           States  Attorney's Office for the Central District of California
           (the 'U.S. Attorney's Office") indicating that it was conducting a
           criminal inquiry under the federal securities laws in connection with
           trading in the Company's securities, as well as accounting errors
           regarding the Company's allowance for repurchase losses. The Company
           has subsequently received a grand jury subpoena requesting
           production of certain documents. The Company intends to cooperate
           with the requests of the U.S. Attorney's Office.

           SEC Investigation

           On March 7, 2007, the Company received a letter from the Pacific
           Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC")
           requesting that NCFC preserve certain documents. On March 12, 2007,
           the Company received a letter from the staff of the Pacific Regional
           Office of the SEC stating that the staff was conducting a
           preliminary investigation involving the Company and requesting
           production of certain documents. The staff of the SEC had also
           previously requested a meeting with the Company to discuss the
           events leading up to the Company's previous announcement of the need
           to restate certain of its historical financial statements. The
           Company intends to cooperate with the requests of the SEC.

           State Regulatory Actions

           The Company has been engaged in recent ongoing discussions with its
           state regulators regarding the Company's funding constraints and the
           impact on consumers who are in various stages of the loan
           origination process with the Company. The Company has advised these
           regulators that it has ceased accepting loan applications. In
           addition, the Company has advised these regulators that at this
           time, the Company and its subsidiaries are unable to fund any
           mortgage loans, including mortgage loans for those consumers who
           were already in the loan origination process with the Company. The
           Company has been and is continuing to work cooperatively with these
           regulators to mitigate the impact on the affected consumers,
           including transferring pending loans and loan applications to other
           mortgage lenders. The Company has also been providing daily reports
           to its various regulators regarding the status of loans in process
           in their states, as well as responding to ad hoc information
           requests.

           The Company received cease and desist orders from the States of
           Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey and New York on March 13,
           2007 (collectively, the "March 13 Orders"). New Century Mortgage
           additionally received a Suspension Order from the state of New York
           on March 13, 2007 (the "NCMC Suspension Order"). The NCMC Suspension
           Order suspends New Century Mortgage's mortgage banking license in
           the State of New York for a period not to exceed 30 days, pending
           investigation. On March 14 and 15, 2007, the Company received
           additional cease and desist orders from the States of Connecticut,
           Maryland, Rhode Island and Tennessee (collectively, the "March 14-15
           Orders"). The March 13 Orders and the March 14-15 Orders contain
           allegations that certain of the Company's subsidiaries have engaged
           in violations of applicable state law, including, among others,
           failure to fund mortgage loans after closing. Additionally, on March
           14, 2007, New Century Mortgage and Home123 entered into a Consent
           Agreement and Order with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department
           of Banking, Bureau of Supervision and Enforcement (the
           "Pennsylvania Consent Agreement").

           The March 13 Orders, the March 14-15 Orders and the Pennsylvania
           Consent Agreement restrain the Company's subsidiaries from taking
           certain actions, including, among others, engaging in alleged
           violations of state law and taking new applications for mortgage
           loans in the relevant jurisdiction. The March 13 Orders, the March
           14-15 Orders and the Pennsylvania Consent Agreement also compel the
           subsidiaries to affirmatively take certain actions, including the
           creation of escrow accounts to hold any up front fees collected in
           connection with pending mortgage applications, the transfer to other
           lenders of the outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded
           mortgage loans held by the subsidiaries, and the provision of
           regular information to the state regulators regarding the
           subsidiaries' activities in the applicable state, including the
           status of all outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded
           mortgage loans in that state. The cease and desist order received
           from the Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation on March 14
           suspends the licenses of one or more of the Company's subsidiaries
           and seeks to assess administrative penalties.

           The Company and its subsidiaries requested hearings on the cease and
           desist orders issued by regulators in Maryland, Massachusetts,
           Connecticut and Rhode Island on March 23, 2007, and in Tennessee on
           March 27, 2007.

           On March 14, 2007, the Attorney General of Ohio and the Ohio
           Department of Commerce, Division of Financial Institution (together,
           the "State") filed a lawsuit against the Company, New Century
           Mortgage and Home123 (collectively, the "Defendants") on March 14,
           2007 in Ohio state court (the "Ohio Complaint"). The Ohio Complaint
           alleges that the Company has engaged in violations of applicable
           state law, including, among others, failure to fund mortgage loans
           after closing. Also on March 14, 2007, the court granted the State's
           motion to enter a temporary restraining order, which was
           subsequently modified by the court on March 16, 2007, against the
           Defendants (as modified, the "TRO"). The TRO restrained the
           Defendants from taking certain actions, including, among others,
           (i) engaging in violations of state law, (ii) soliciting applicants
           and taking new applications for mortgage loans in Ohio and (iii)
           initiating, prosecuting or enforcing foreclosure actions in Ohio.
           The TRO required the parties to confer with respect to restrictions
           regarding foreclosure action and the sale, transfer or assignment of
           loans more than 60 days delinquent. On March 26, 2007, the
           Defendants filed a Motion for Dissolution of Modified Temporary
           Restraining Order and Motion for an Emergency Hearing, and
           Opposition to a Preliminary Injunction. On March 28, 2007, the
           Defendants and the State reached agreement on a Stipulated
           Preliminary Injunction effective for 90 days and submitted it for
           court approval. The Stipulated Preliminary Injunction replaces the
           TRO and provides for a stay of the litigation for 90 days. The
           Stipulated Preliminary Injunction restrains the Defendants from
           taking certain actions, including, among others, engaging in alleged
           violations of state law and taking new applications for mortgage
           loans. The Stipulated Preliminary Injunction also compels the
           Defendants to take certain actions, including the transfer to other
           lenders of any outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded
           mortgage loans, the placement in escrow of any upfront fees
           collected in connection with pending mortgage applications, and the
           provision of regular information to the State regarding the
           Company's activities in Ohio, including the status of all
           outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded mortgage loans. The
           Stipulated Preliminary Injunction also requires the Defendants to
           submit certain loans (and related information) as to which it
           intends to foreclose to the State for the State to review. The State
           may object to the Company proceeding with a particular foreclosure
           and if the Company is unable to convince the State to permit it to
           proceed, the foreclosure will not proceed for the duration of the
           Stipulated Preliminary Injunction. The Stipulated Preliminary
           Injunction also provides for the State to review and object to the
           Defendants selling, transferring or assigning certain loans that are
           more than 60 days delinquent.

           On March 16, 2007, the Company received additional cease and desist
           orders from the State of California (the "California Orders") and
           certain of the Company's subsidiaries entered into consent
           agreements with the State of Florida's Office of Financial
           Regulation and the State of Washington's Department of Financial
           Institutions, respectively, each dated March 16, 2007 (the "March 16
           Agreements" and together with the California Orders, the "March 16
           Orders and Consent Agreements").

           The March 16 Orders and Consent Agreements contain allegations that
           certain of the Company's subsidiaries have engaged in violations of
           state law, including, among others, failure to fund mortgage loans
           after closing. The March 16 Orders and Consent Agreements restrain
           the Company's subsidiaries from taking certain actions, including,
           among others, engaging in alleged violations of state law and taking
           new applications for mortgage loans in the relevant jurisdiction.
           The March 16 Orders and Consent Agreements also compel the
           subsidiaries to affirmatively take certain actions, including the
           creation of escrow accounts to hold any upfront fees collected in
           connection with pending mortgage applications, the transfer to other
           lenders of the outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded
           mortgage loans held by the subsidiaries, and the provision of
           regular information to the state regulators regarding the
           subsidiaries' activities in the applicable state, including the
           status of all outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded
           mortgage loans in that state.

           On March 16, 2007, Home123 received a suspension order (the "Home123
           Suspension Order") from the State of New York Banking Department.
           The Home123 Suspension Order contains allegations similar to those
           included in the NCMC Suspension Order and further provides that
           Home123's mortgage banking license in the State of New York has been
           suspended for a period not exceeding 30 days, pending investigation.
           The Company and Home123 are reviewing the Home123 Suspension Order
           and accordingly have not yet determined whether they will appeal all
           or any portion of the Home123 Suspension Order.

           On March 20, 2007, the Company entered into a Combined Statement of
           Charges and Consent Order with the State of Iowa and a Consent
           Agreement and Order with the State of Maine Office of Consumer
           Credit Regulation, Department of Professional and Financial
           Regulation (together,  the "March 20 Orders"). On March 21, 2007,
           the Company entered into a Consent Order with the State of Michigan,
           Department of Labor & Economic Growth, Office of Financial and
           Insurance  Services and a Consent Order with the State of Wyoming
           Banking Commission (the "March 21 Orders"). On March 23, 2007, the
           Company entered into a Consent Agreement and Order with the State of
           Idaho Department of Finance (the "March 23 Order"). Similar to the
           consent agreements described above, the March 20, 21 and 23 Orders
           contain allegations that certain of the Company's subsidiaries have
           engaged in violations of state law, including, among others, failure
           to fund mortgage loans after closing. They restrain the Company's
           subsidiaries from taking certain actions, including, among others,
           engaging in alleged violations of state law and taking new
           applications for mortgage loans in the relevant jurisdiction. They
           also compel the subsidiaries to affirmatively take certain actions,
           including the creation of escrow accounts to hold any upfront fees
           collected in connection with pending mortgage applications, the
           transfer to other lenders of the  outstanding mortgage applications
           and unfunded mortgage loans held by the subsidiaries, and the
           provision of regular information to the state regulators regarding
           the subsidiaries' activities in the applicable state, including the
           status of all  outstanding  mortgage applications and unfunded
           mortgage loans in that state.

           The Company anticipates that cease and desist orders will continue
           to be received by the Company and its subsidiaries from additional
           states in the future and that the Company and its subsidiaries may
           enter into additional consent agreements similar to those described
           above. The Company does not undertake, and expressly disclaims, any
           obligations to update this disclosure for any such additional cease
           and desist orders or consent agreements or for any developments with
           respect to any of the state regulatory actions described herein.

           The Company intends to continue to cooperate with its regulators in
           order to mitigate the impact on consumers resulting from the
           Company's funding constraints.


            Fremont Investment & Loan

            On March 7, 2006, Fremont Investment & Loan, its parent, Fremont
            General Corporation and the company's wholly owned subsidiary,
            Fremont General Credit Corporation consented to the terms of a
            cease and desist order issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance
            Corporation without admitting to the allegations contained therein.
            The cease and desist order requires, among other things, Fremont to
            cease and desist from the following:

            (1) Operating with management whose policies and practices are
            detrimental to Fremont; (2) operating Fremont without effective
            risk management policies and procedures in place in relation to
            Fremont's brokered subprime mortgage lending and commercial real
            estate construction lending businesses; (3) operating with
            inadequate underwriting criteria and excessive risk in relation to
            the kind and quality of assets held by Fremont; (4) operating
            without an accurate, rigorous and properly documented methodology
            concerning its allowance for loan and lease losses; (5) operating
            with a large volume of poor quality loans; (6) engaging in
            unsatisfactory lending practices; (7) operating without an adequate
            strategic plan in relation to the volatility of Fremont's business
            lines and the kind and quality of assets held by Fremont; (8)
            operating with inadequate capital in relation to the kind and
            quality of assets held by Fremont; (9) operating in such a manner
            as to produce low and unsustainable earnings; (10) operating with
            inadequate provisions for liquidity in relation to the volatility
            of Fremont's business lines and the kind and quality of assets held
            by Fremont; (11) marketing and extending adjustable-rate mortgage
            products to subprime borrowers in an unsafe and unsound manner that
            greatly increases the risk that borrowers will default on the loans
            or otherwise cause losses to Fremont, including (a) adjustable-rate
            mortgage products that qualify borrowers for loans with low initial
            payments based on an introductory rate that will expire after an
            initial period, without adequate analysis of the borrower's ability
            to repay at the fully indexed rate, (b) adjustable-rate mortgage
            products containing features likely to require frequent refinancing
            to maintain affordable monthly payment or to avoid foreclosure, and
            (c)loans or loan arrangements with loan-to-value ratios approaching
            or exceeding 100 percent of the value of the collateral; (12)making
            mortgage loans without adequately considering the borrower's
            ability to repay the mortgage according to its terms; (13)operating
            in violation of Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, in that
            Fremont engaged in transactions with its affiliates on terms and
            under circumstances that in good faith would not be offered to, or
            would not apply to, nonaffiliated companies; and (14) operating
            inconsistently with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's
            Interagency Advisory on Mortgage Banking and Interagency Expanded
            Guidance for Subprime Lending Programs. The cease and desist order
            also requires Fremont to take a number of steps, including (1)
            having and retaining qualified management; (2) limiting Fremont
            General's and Fremont General Credit Corporation's representation
            on Fremont's board of directors and requiring that independent
            directors comprise a majority of Fremont's board of directors; (3)
            revising and implementing written lending policies to provide
            effective guidance and control over Fremont's residential lending
            function; (4)revising and implementing policies governing
            communications with consumers to ensure that borrowers are provided
            with sufficient information; (5) implementing control systems to
            monitor whether Fremont's actual practices are consistent with its
            policies and procedures; (6) implementing a third-party mortgage
            broker monitoring program and plan; (7) developing a five-year
            strategic plan, including policies and procedures for diversifying
            Fremont's loan portfolio; (8) implementing a policy covering
            Fremont's capital analysis on subprime residential loans; (9)
            performing quarterly valuations and cash flow analyses on Fremont's
            residual interests and mortgage servicing rights from its
            residential lending operation, and obtaining annual independent
            valuations of such interests and rights; (10) limiting extensions
            of credit to certain commercial real estate borrowers; (11)
            implementing a written lending and collection policy to provide
            effective guidance and control over Fremont's commercial real
            estate lending function, including a planned material reduction in
            the volume of funded and unfunded nonrecourse lending and loans for
            condominium conversion and construction as a percentage of Tier I
            capital; (12) submitting a capital plan that will include a Tier I
            capital ratio of not less than 14% of Fremont's total assets; (13)
            implementing a written profit plan; (14) limiting the payment of
            cash dividends by Fremont without the prior written consent of the
            Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Commissioner of the
            California Department of Financial Institutions; (15) implementing
            a written liquidity and funds management policy to provide
            effective guidance and control over Fremont's liquidity position
            and needs; (16) prohibiting the receipt, renewal or rollover of
            brokered deposit accounts without obtaining a Brokered Deposit
            Waiver approved by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; (17)
            reducing adversely classified assets; and (18) implementing a
            comprehensive plan for the methodology for determining the adequacy
            of the allowance for loan and lease losses.


  Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and Certain Relationships and
             Related Transactions.

            No applicable updates.

  Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.

            See Item 15.

            The 1122 statements for First American Real Estate Solutions of
            Texas, L.P. (as Sub-Contractor for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC) has
            disclosed the following material instance of noncompliance with the
            servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of
            Regulation AB applicable to the Company during year ended December
            31, 2006. Account reconciliations for all asset-backed securities
            related bank accounts were not prepared within 30 calendar days
            after the bank statement cutoff date, or such other number of days
            specified in the transaction agreements as required by Item
            1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of Regulation AB.

            The 1122 statements for Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
            (Corporate Trust Services) has disclosed material noncompliance with
            criterion 1122(d)(3)(i), as applicable to the Company during the
            twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Certain monthly investor or
            remittance reports included errors in the calculation and/or the
            reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets.

            Although each servicing criterion required by Item 1122(d) of
            Regulation AB is addressed in one or more of of the Assessment of
            Compliance with Servicing Criteria and related Attestation Reports
            included with this report, of GMAC Mortgage LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage
            Corporation a Servicer, Assessment of Compliance and related
            Attestation Report did not address each of the servicing criteria
            that the Servicer was required to address under the terms of the
            related Servicing Agreement. The Servicer has not identified such
            failure to provide an Assessment and Attestation for these items as
            a material failure to fulfill its obligations under the related
            servicing agreement in the Servicer's Compliance Statement provided
            under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, because the Servicer asserts that
            those items are not applicable to the Servicer.

  Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.

            See Item 15.



                                PART IV


  Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

   (a) Exhibits

    (4)  Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2006, among
         ACE Securities Corp., as Depositor, GMAC Mortgage Corporation as a
         Servicer and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC as a Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank,
         National Association, as Master Servicer and Securities  Administrator
         and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
         herein by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form
         8-K of the registrant, as filed with the Commission).

    (31) Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

    (33) Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
         asset-backed securities.



      <TABLE>

      
         <c>
      a) Assurant Inc. as Sub-Contractor for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC <F1>
      b) Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian <F1>
      c) First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. as Sub-Contractor for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC <F1>
      d) GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer <F1>
      e) Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Servicer <F1>
      f) Regulus Group LLC as Sub-Contractor for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC <F1>
      g) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer <F1>
      h) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator <F1>
      i) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Paying Agent <F1>
      j) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian <F1>

      </TABLE>

     (34) Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
          criteria for asset-backed securities.

      <TABLE>

      
        <c>
      a) Assurant Inc. as Sub-Contractor for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC <F1>
      b) Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian <F1>
      c) First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. as Sub-Contractor for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC <F1>
      d) GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer <F1>
      e) Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Servicer <F1>
      f) Regulus Group LLC as Sub-Contractor for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC <F1>
      g) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer <F1>
      h) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator <F1>
      i) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Paying Agent <F1>
      j) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian <F1>

      </TABLE>

     (35) Servicer compliance statement.

      <TABLE>

      
         <c>
      a) GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer <F1>
      b) Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Servicer <F1>
      c) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer <F1>
      d) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator <F1>


      </TABLE>

   (b) See Exhibits identified in Paragraph (a) above.

   (c) Not applicable.


  <F1> Filed herewith.



                                SIGNATURES

  Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
  signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



    ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-SL1
    (Issuing Entity)

    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    (Master Servicer)

    /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
    Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

    Date: March 30, 2007


  Exhibit Index

  Exhibit No.

    (31) Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

    (33) Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
         asset-backed securities.



      <TABLE>

      
         <c>
      a) Assurant Inc. as Sub-Contractor for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
      b) Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian
      c) First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. as Sub-Contractor for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
      d) GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer
      e) Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Servicer
      f) Regulus Group LLC as Sub-Contractor for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
      g) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer
      h) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator
      i) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Paying Agent
      j) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian

      </TABLE>

     (34) Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
          criteria for asset-backed securities.

      <TABLE>

      
        <c>
      a) Assurant Inc. as Sub-Contractor for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
      b) Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian
      c) First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. as Sub-Contractor for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
      d) GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer
      e) Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Servicer
      f) Regulus Group LLC as Sub-Contractor for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
      g) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer
      h) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator
      i) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Paying Agent
      j) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian

      </TABLE>

     (35) Servicer compliance statement.

      <TABLE>

      
         <c>

      a) GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer
      b) Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Servicer
      c) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer
      d) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator


      </TABLE>

  EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K of ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series
     2006-SL1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation as Servicer and
     Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC as Servicer.

     Dated: March 30, 2007

     /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
     Signature

     Vice President
     Title


EX-33 (a)
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH
SECTION 1122(d)(2)(vi) and SECTION 1122(d)(4)(xi)
of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and
Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc.,
collectively the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance as
of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through December
31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in
Section 1122(d)(2)(vi), Section 1122(d)(4)(xi) and Section 1122(d)(4)(xii) of
Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, which the
Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing
activities it performs with respect to all mortgage loan-tracking transactions
covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all
mortgage loan-tracking transactions for which the Asserting Party served as a
Vendor on behalf of Servicers for such asset-backed securities transactions that
were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"). The scope of
the Asserting Party assertions excludes Section 1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17,
Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, which relates to
servicing activities that are performed by the Asserting Party with respect to
the Platform, but are not reported on herein.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with Section 1122(d)(2)(vi) and
Section 1122(d)(4)(xi) ("the Applicable Servicing Criteria") for the Reporting
Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material
respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with
respect to the Platform taken as a whole. The Asserting Party used the criteria
set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period ending December
31, 2006 as set forth in this assertion.

American Security Insurance Company
Standard Guaranty Insurance Company
Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.

By: /s/ John Frobose
John Frobose
Senior Vice President

Date: February 23, 2007


(page)


ANNUAL CERTIFICATION

Re: Servicing-Related Activities subject to Regulation AB provided by American
Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and/or Safeco
Financial Institution Solutions, Inc. (the "Vendor") to Ocwen Loan Servicing,
LLC (the "Servicer")

I, John Frobose, a Senior Vice President of the Vendor, as a provider of certain
servicing-related activities to the Servicer for the twelve month period ending
December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), hereby certify to the Servicer, and
its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that
they will rely upon this certification, that:

1. I have reviewed the report on the assessment of the Vendor's compliance with
the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB that are
applicable to the Vendor for the Reporting Period (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"), provided in accordance with Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and Item
1122(d) of Regulation AB (the "Vendor Assessment"), and the registered public
accounting firm's attestation report provided in accordance with Rules 13a-18
and 15d-18 under the Exchange Act and Item 1122(b) of Regulation AB for the
Reporting Period (the "Attestation Report"), (collectively, the "Vendor
Information");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Vendor Information, taken as a whole, does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the Vendor Information required to be provided
to the Servicer by the Vendor pursuant to Regulation AB has been provided to the
Servicer;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the Applicable Servicing Criteria performed by
the Vendor, and except as disclosed in the Vendor Assessment or the Attestation
Report, the Vendor has fulfilled its obligations pursuant to Regulation AB in
all material respects; and

5. The Vendor Assessment and the Attestation Report required to be provided to
the Servicer have been provided to the Servicer. Any material instance of
non-compliance described in such Vendor Assessment or Attestation Report has
been disclosed to the Servicer. Any material instance of non-compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria has been disclosed in such Vendor Assessment or
Attestation Report.

American Security Insurance Company
Standard Guaranty Insurance Company
Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.

By: /s/ John Frobose
Name:  John Frobose
Title: Senior Vice President





EX-33 (b)
Appendix I

MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE

Management of the Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (collectively
the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that the servicing
criteria are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as
follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage
-backed securities and other asset-backed securities issued on or after
January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration or paying agent services, excluding any publicly issued
transactions sponsored or issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d), except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(2)(iii),1122(d)(4)(iv),
1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)
(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii) and 1122
(d)(4)(xiv), which management has determined are not applicable to the
activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria").

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

Management's interpretation of Applicable Servicing Criteria: The Company's
management has determined that servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii) is applicable
only with respect to its continuing obligation to act as, or locate a,
successor servicer under the circumstances referred to in certain governing
documents. It is management's interpretation that Deutsche Bank Trust Company
America has no other active back-up servicing responsibilities in regards to
1122(d)(1)(iii) as of and for the Period.

Third parties classified as vendors: With respect to servicing criteria 1122(d)
(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i), and 1122(d)(4)(ii), management has engaged various
vendors to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria. The
Company's management has determined that these vendors are not considered a
"servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company's
management has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the
servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation
17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available
Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by
Interpretation 17.06, management has asserted that it has policies and
procedures in place to provide reasonable assurance that the vendor's
activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria
applicable to each vendor. The Company's management is solely responsible for
determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06
for the vendors and related criteria.

With respect to the Platform, the Company's management provides the following
assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company's management is responsible for assessing the Company's
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

2.The Company's management has assessed compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria, including servicing criteria for which compliance is
determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the
Period. In performing this assessment, management used the criteria set forth
by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the management's assertion of compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.


(page)


Appendix I


DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY

By: /s/ Gary R. Vaughan
Name: Gary R. Vaughan
Its: Managing Director

By: /s/ David Co
Name: David Co
Its: Director

By: /s/ Jose Sicilia
Name: Jose Sicilia
Its: Managing Director

By: /s/ Kevin Fischer
Name: Kevin Fischer
Its: Vice President

By: /s/ Robert Frier
Name: Robert Frier
Its: Director

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

By: /s/ Kevin C. Weeks
Name: Kevin C. Weeks
Its: Managing Director

By: /s/ Jenna Kaufman
Name: Jenna Kaufman
Its: Director





EX-33 (c)
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of
The First American Corporation, and the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006, and for the period from January 1,
2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
(d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of
Federal Regulations (the "CFR") applicable to the Asserting Party (the
"Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report
include all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which
the Asserting Party served as the residential tax service provider (the
"Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that, except as set forth
hereinbelow, the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

The Asserting Party assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has identified a material instance of
noncompliance with the servicing criterion set forth in Section
229.1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of the CFR with respect to the Platform. Specifically,
the Asserting Party did not prepare reconciliations for all asset-backed
securities related bank accounts within 30 calendar days after the bank
statement cut-off date or such number of days specified in the transaction
agreements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.


FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.
By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC
General Partner

/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla
Lucy A. Przybyla
Senior Vice President
February 28, 2007





EX-33 (d)
(logo) GMAC Mortgage


Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance
With Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Criteria


March 6, 2007

GMAC Mortgage, LLC (the "Company") has responsibility for assessing compliance
to Regulation AB Item 1122(d) Servicing Criteria for the GMACM Private Platform
(the "Platform"). As of, and for the period ending December 31, 2006, the
Company has used the applicable 1122(d) servicing criteria listed below for
assessing compliance:

- 1122(d)(1)(i),(ii),(iv); 1122(d)(2)(i),(ii),(iii),(v),(vi),(vii);
  1122(d)(3)(iii),(iv); 1122(d)(4)(iii),(iv),(v),(vi),(vii),(viii),(ix),(x),
  (xi),(xii),(xiii),(xiv),(xv)

The following servicing criteria are not applicable to the Company:

- 1122(d)(1)(iii); 1122 (d)(2)(iv); 1122 (d)(3)(i),(ii); 1122(d)(4)(i),(ii)

The Company has engaged certain vendors (the "Vendors") to perform specific and
limited, or scripted activities, and the Company elects to take responsibility
for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to the Vendors
set forth below:

- 1122(d)(2)(i) 1122(d)(4)(iv)
- A vendor posts cash receipts received via lockbox submission to the
  Company's lockbox clearing account.

- 1122(d)(4)(xi), (xiii)
- A vendor provides certain information to the Company to assist the Company
  in making tax and insurance payments on behalf of certain obligors.

The Company has not identified and is not aware of any material instance of
noncompliance by the Vendors with the applicable servicing criteria as of
December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
taken as a whole. The Company has not identified any material deficiency in its
policies and procedures to monitor the compliance by the Vendors with the
applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting
Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

The Company has complied, in all material respects, with the applicable
servicing criteria above as of and for the period ending December 31, 2006 for
the asset-backed transactions listed in Appendix A taken as a whole (such
transactions, collectively, the "GMACM Private Platform").

An independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation
report on the Company's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria as of, and for the period ending December 31, 2006.


/s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Anthony N. Renzi
Executive Vice President
GMAC Mortgage, LLC


(page)


Appendix A


Security


SACO 06-1
SACO 06-12
SACO 06-8
2006-5
SACO 06-10
SACO 06-6
SACO 06-7
SACO 06-9
SACO 06-9
GPMF2006AR6
GPMF2006AR7
GPMF2006AR8
2006-ARS1
LMT 2006-7
LXS 06-18N
2006-B
BAFC 06-5
HBVW 06-SB1
GSMPS06RP1
GSR 2006-2F
GSR2006-AR1
GSR 2006-4F
MSM 06-10SL
MSM 06-14SL
GPMF2006AR4
GPMF2006AR5
LXS2006-12N
LXS2006-GP4
2006-3H
2006-GEL3
LMT 2006-2
SAIL2006-2
2006-4N
2006-GP1
2006-GP2
2006-GP3
LXS 06-10N
NAAC2006S1
NAAC2006S2
2006-GEL4
2006-RF2
2006-S1
LXS 06-10N
LXS 06-12N
LXS 2006-7
LXS 2006-8
LXS2006-11
LXS2006-13


(page)


2006-1
MALT 2006-1
MALT 2006-3
MASD 2006-1
2006-HE1
CSMC 2006-1
CSMC 2006-8
CSMC 2006-9
LUM 2006-4
LUM 2006-5
MARM 06OA2
MARP 06-2
MIT 2006-1
MSM 06-1AR
MSM 06-9AR
MSM06-13ARX
MSM06-15XS
MSM06-16AX
MSM06-17XS
SASCO 06BC2
BAFC 06-1
BAFC 06-2
BAFC 06-4
GSR 2006-3F
MASTR 06-1
MASTR 06-3
MASD 2006-2
ACE2006-SL1
ACE2006-SL4
MASD 2006-2
MASD 2006-3
BAYVW2006-D
BSABS06SD2
BSALTA 06-1
BSALTA 06-3
BSALTA 06-4
BSALTA 06-5
BSALTA 06-8
BSARM2006-2
DBALT06AB1
DBALT06AB2
DBALT06AB3
DBALT06AB4
DBALT06AF1
DBALT06AR1
DBALT06AR2
DBALT06AR3
DBALT06AR5
DBALT06AR6
DBALT06OA1
HBRVW 06-10
HRRVW 06-8
HBRVW 06-8
PRIME06-CL1


(page)


SACO 06-11
SAIL 2006-3
2006-AR3
2006-AR4
2006-S5
ARMT 2006-2
GSR2006-AR2
HBVW2006-13
HBVW2006-14
MARP 06-1
NHELI 06AF1





EX-33 (e)
(logo) OCWEN

Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria

1.   Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC ("Ocwen") is responsible for assessing compliance
     with the servicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item
     1122 of Regulation AB, as of and for the 12-month period ending December
     31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), as set forth in Appendix A hereto. The
     transactions covered by this report include asset-backed securities
     transactions for which Ocwen acted as servicer involving residential
     mortgage loans other than transactions closing prior to the effective date
     of Regulation AB (the "Platform") as set forth in Appendix B hereto;

2.   Ocwen has engaged certain vendors (the "Vendors") to perform specific,
     limited or scripted activities, and Ocwen elects to take responsibility for
     assessing compliance with the servicing criteria or portion of the
     servicing criteria applicable to such Vendors' activities as set forth in
     Appendix A hereto;

3.   Except as set forth in paragraph 4 below, Ocwen used the criteria set forth
     in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance
     with the applicable servicing criteria;

4.   The criteria listed in the column titled "Inapplicable Servicing Criteria"
     on Appendix A hereto are inapplicable to Ocwen based on the activities it
     performs, directly or through its Vendors, with respect to the Platform;

5.   Ocwen has complied, in all material respects, with the applicable servicing
     criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period with respect
     to the Platform taken as a whole;

6.   Ocwen has not identified and is not aware of any material instance of
     noncompliance by the Vendors with the applicable servicing criteria as of
     December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
     taken as a whole;

7.   Ocwen has not identified any material deficiency in its policies and
     procedures to monitor the compliance by the Vendors with the applicable
     servicing criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period
     with respect to the Platform taken as a whole; and

8.   Crowe Chizek and Company LLC, a registered public accounting firm, has
     issued an attestation report on Ocwen's assessment of compliance with the
     applicable servicing criteria for the Reporting Period.

March 8, 2007
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC


By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name:  Ronald M. Faris
Title: President


(page)


APPENDIX A

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                               <C>                             <C>
                                                                                                              INAPPLICABLE
                                                                              APPLICABLE                       SERVICING
                        SERVICING CRITERIA                                SERVICING CRITERIA                    CRITERIA
<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>                               <C>             <C>              <C>            <C>
                                                                                       Performed      Performed by
                                                                                           by        subservicer(s)       NOT
                                                                                        Vendor(s)     or vendor(s)    performed by
                                                                                       for which       for which      Ocwen or by
                                                                       Performed        Ocwen is        Ocwen is     subservicer(s)
                                                                        Directly          the           NOT the       or vendor(s)
                                                                           by         Responsible     Responsible     retained by
    Reference                        Criteria                             Ocwen           Party           Party           Ocwen

                          General Servicing Considerations

1122(d)(1)(i)    Policies and procedures are instituted to monitor         X
                 any performance or other triggers and events of
                 default in accordance with the transaction
                 agreements.

1122(d)(1)(ii)   If any material servicing activities are                  X
                 outsourced to third parties, policies and
                 procedures are instituted to monitor the third
                 party's performance and compliance with such
                 servicing activities.

1122(d)(1)(iii)  Any requirements in the transaction agreements to                                                         X
                 maintain a back-up servicer for the pool assets
                 are maintained.

1122(d)(1)(iv)   A fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy is        X
                 in effect on the party participating in the
                 servicing function throughout the reporting period
                 in the amount of coverage required by and
                 otherwise in accordance with the terms of the
                 transaction agreements.

                         Cash Collection and Administration

1122(d)(2)(i)    Payments on pool assets are deposited into the            X^1                               X^1
                 appropriate custodial bank accounts and related
                 bank clearing accounts no more than two business
                 days following receipt, or such other number of
                 days specified in the transaction agreements.

1122(d)(2)(ii)   Disbursements made via wire transfer on behalf of         X
                 an obligor or to an investor are made only by
                 authorized personnel

1122(d)(2)(iii)  Advances of funds or guarantees regarding                 X
                 collections, cash flows or distributions, and any
                 interest or other fees charged for such advances,
                 are made, reviewed and approved as specified in
                 the transaction agreements.

1122(d)(2)(iv)   The related accounts for the transaction, such as         X
                 cash reserve accounts or accounts established as
                 a form of overcollateralization, are separately
                 maintained (e.g., with respect to commingling of
                 cash) as set forth in the transaction agreements.



1122(d)(2)(v)    Each custodial account is maintained at a                 X
                 federally insured depository institution as set
                 forth in the transaction agreements. For purposes
                 of this criterion, "federally insured depository
                 institution" with respect to a foreign financial
                 institution means a foreign financial institution
                 that meets the requirements of Rule 13k-1(b)(1)
                 of the Securities Exchange Act.
</TABLE>


(page)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                               <C>                             <C>
                                                                                                              INAPPLICABLE
                                                                              APPLICABLE                       SERVICING
                        SERVICING CRITERIA                                SERVICING CRITERIA                    CRITERIA
<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>                               <C>             <C>              <C>            <C>
                                                                                       Performed      Performed by
                                                                                           by        subservicer(s)       NOT
                                                                                        Vendor(s)     or vendor(s)    performed by
                                                                                       for which       for which      Ocwen or by
                                                                       Performed        Ocwen is        Ocwen is     subservicer(s)
                                                                        Directly          the           NOT the       or vendor(s)
                                                                           by         Responsible     Responsible     retained by
    Reference                        Criteria                             Ocwen           Party           Party           Ocwen

1122(d)(2)(vi)   Unissued checks are safeguarded so as to prevent          X^2                               X^2
                 unauthorized access.

1122(d)(2)(vii)  Reconciliations are prepared on a monthly basis           X
                 for all asset-backed securities related bank
                 accounts, including custodial accounts and related
                 bank clearing accounts. These reconciliations are
                 (A) mathematically accurate; (B) prepared within
                 30 calendar days after the bank statement cutoff
                 date, or such other number of days specified in
                 the transaction agreements: (C) reviewed and
                 approved by someone other than the person who
                 prepared the reconciliation; and (D) contain
                 explanations for reconciling items. These
                 reconciling items are resolved within 90 calendar
                 days of their original identification, or such
                 other number of days specified in the transaction
                 agreements.

                         Investor Remittances and Reporting

1122(d)(3)(i)    Reports to investors, including those to be filed         X^3
                 with the Commission, are maintained in accordance
                 with the transaction agreements and applicable
                 Commission requirements. Specifically, such
                 reports (A) are prepared in accordance with
                 timeframes and other terms set forth in the
                 transaction agreements; (B) provide information
                 calculated in accordance with the terms specified
                 in the transaction agreements; (C) are filed with
                 the Commission as required by its rules and
                 regulations; and (D) agree with investors' or the
                 trustee's records as to the total unpaid principal
                 balance and number of pool assets serviced by the
                 Servicer.

1122(d)(3)(ii)   Amounts due to investors are allocated and                X^3
                 remitted in accordance with timeframes,
                 distribution priority and other terms set forth
                 in the transaction agreements.

1122(d)(3)(iii)  Disbursements made to an investor are posted              X^3
                 within two business days to the Servicer's
                 investor records, or such other number of days
                 specified in the transaction agreements.

1122(d)(3)(iv)   Amounts remitted to investors per the investor            X^3
                 reports agree with cancelled checks, or other form
                 of payment, on custodial bank statements.
</TABLE>


(page)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                               <C>                             <C>
                                                                                                              INAPPLICABLE
                                                                              APPLICABLE                       SERVICING
                        SERVICING CRITERIA                                SERVICING CRITERIA                    CRITERIA
<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>                               <C>             <C>              <C>            <C>
                                                                                       Performed      Performed by
                                                                                           by        subservicer(s)       NOT
                                                                                        Vendor(s)     or vendor(s)    performed by
                                                                                       for which       for which      Ocwen or by
                                                                       Performed        Ocwen is        Ocwen is     subservicer(s)
                                                                        Directly          the           NOT the       or vendor(s)
                                                                           by         Responsible     Responsible     retained by
    Reference                        Criteria                             Ocwen           Party           Party           Ocwen

                             Pool Asset Administration

1122(d)(4)(i)    Collateral or security on pool assets is                  X
                 maintained as required by the transaction
                 agreements or related mortgage loan documents.

1122(d)(4)(ii)   Pool asset and related documents are safeguarded          X
                 as required by the transaction agreements

1122(d)(4)(iii)  Any additions, removals or substitutions to the           X
                 asset pool are made, reviewed and approved in
                 accordance with any conditions or requirements in
                 the transaction agreements.

1122(d)(4)(iv)   Payments on pool assets, including any payoffs,           X^4                               X^4
                 made in accordance with the related pool asset
                 documents are posted to the Servicer's obligor
                 records maintained no more than two business days
                 after receipt, or such other number of days
                 specified in the transaction agreements, and
                 allocated to principal, interest or other items
                 (e.g., escrow) in accordance with the related pool
                 asset documents.

1122(d)(4)(v)    The Servicer's records regarding the pool assets          X
                 agree with the Servicer's records with respect to
                 an obligor's unpaid principal balance.

1122(d)(4)(vi)   Changes with respect to the terms or status of an         X
                 obligor's pool assets (e.g., loan modifications or
                 re-agings) are made, reviewed and approved by
                 authorized personnel in accordance with the
                 transaction agreements and related pool asset
                 documents.

1122(d)(4)(vii)  Loss mitigation or recovery actions                       X
                 (e.g., forbearance plans, modifications and
                 deeds in lieu of foreclosure, foreclosures and
                 repossessions, as applicable) are initiated,
                 conducted and concluded in accordance with the
                 timeframes or other requirements established
                 by the transaction agreements.

1122(d)(4)(viii) Records documenting collection efforts are                X
                 maintained during the period a pool asset is
                 delinquent in accordance with the transaction
                 agreements. Such records are maintained on at
                 least a monthly basis, or such other period
                 specified in the transaction agreements, and
                 describe the entity's activities in monitoring
                 delinquent pool assets including, for example,
                 phone calls, letters and payment rescheduling
                 plans in cases where delinquency is deemed
                 temporary (e.g., illness or unemployment).

1122(d)(4)(ix)   Adjustments to interest rates or rates of return          X
                 for pool assets with variable rates are computed
                 based on the related pool asset documents.
</TABLE>


(page)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                               <C>                             <C>
                                                                                                              INAPPLICABLE
                                                                              APPLICABLE                       SERVICING
                        SERVICING CRITERIA                                SERVICING CRITERIA                    CRITERIA
<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>                               <C>             <C>              <C>            <C>
                                                                                       Performed      Performed by
                                                                                           by        subservicer(s)       NOT
                                                                                        Vendor(s)     or vendor(s)    performed by
                                                                                       for which       for which      Ocwen or by
                                                                       Performed        Ocwen is        Ocwen is     subservicer(s)
                                                                        Directly          the           NOT the       or vendor(s)
                                                                           by         Responsible     Responsible     retained by
    Reference                        Criteria                             Ocwen           Party           Party           Ocwen

1122(d)(4)(x)    Regarding any funds held in trust for an obligor          X
                 (such as escrow accounts): (A) such funds are
                 analyzed, in accordance with the obligor's pool
                 asset documents, on at least an annual basis, or
                 such other period specified in the transaction
                 agreements; (B) interest on such funds is paid, or
                 credited, to obligors in accordance with
                 applicable pool asset documents and state laws;
                 and (C) such funds are returned to the obligor
                 within 30 calendar days of full repayment of the
                 related pool assets, or such other number of days
                 specified in the transaction agreements.

1122(d)(4)(xi)   Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as            X^5                               X^5
                 tax or insurance payments) are made on or before
                 the related penalty or expiration dates, as
                 indicated on the appropriate bills or notices
                 for such payments, provided that such support has
                 been received by the Servicer at least 30 calendar
                 days prior to these dates, or such other number of
                 days specified in the transaction agreements.

1122(d)(4)(xii)  Any late payment penalties in connection with             X^6                               X^6
                 any payment to be made on behalf of an obligor are
                 paid from the Servicer's funds and not charged to
                 the obligor, unless the late payment was due to
                 the obligor's error or omission.

1122(d)(4)(xiii) Disbursements made on behalf of an obligor are            X^7                               X^7
                 posted within two business days to the obligor's
                 records maintained by the Servicer, or such other
                 number of days specified in the transaction
                 agreements.

1122(d)(4)(xiv)  Delinquencies, charge-offs and uncollectible              X
                 accounts are recognized and recorded in accordance
                 with the transaction agreements.

1122(d)(4)(xv)   Any external enhancement or other support,                                                                X
                 identified in Item 1114(a)(1) through (3) or
                 Item 1115 of Regulation AB, is maintained as set
                 forth in the transaction agreements.




<FN>
1  Both Regulus Group LLC and Ocwen perform aspects of this servicing criteria.
   Regulus is responsible for depositing any checks received into the payment
   deposit account Ocwen is responsible for other forms of payments, and the
   sweeping of funds deposited in the payment deposit account to the appropriate
   deal level custodial bank accounts.

2  Assurant, Inc. and Ocwen each issue checks and maintain unissued checks.
   Assurant issues checks for the insurance advances, while Ocwen issues all
   other checks.

3  Ocwen has determined for purposes of assessing the servicing criteria listed
   in Items 1122(d)(3(i)-(iv) that, pursuant to the Securities and Exchange
   Commission Telephone Interpretation 11.03, the term "investor" as used in
   those Items does not pertain to the entity to which Ocwen provides the
   applicable information (i.e. Master Servicer, Trustee, etc.) and includes
   certificate and bond holders. Consequently, the information regarding such
   items provided herein relates to Ocwen's provision of such information to the
   entity who ultimately disseminates such information to the investors.

4  Regulus transmits a daily data file that represents payments received for the
   current day to Ocwen. Ocwen then loads the data file received from Regulus in
   its servicing system, which then applies the funds in accordance with the
   terms of the related transaction agreements.

5  Assurant, Inc. and First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P.
   ("First American") transmit daily data files for insurance and taxes,
   respectively, which represent payments received for the current day to
   Ocwen. Ocwen loads the data files into its servicing system, which records
   the disbursements in the system and then sends the applicable funds via mail
   or wire.

6  First American identifies late payments and includes them as part of the
   daily data transmissions. Ocwen identifies late payments in the data
   transmissions and credits to the borrower's applicable account on its
   servicing system. Ocwen also maintains control reports to identify any late
   payments not identified by First American.

7  First American transmits daily data files that represent disbursements
   required to be made by Ocwen. Ocwen loads the stat file into its servicing
   system and records the disbursements on the system.
</FN>
</TABLE>


(page)


APPENDIX B


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                      <C>

                      Deal Name

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-ASAP2

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-SL1

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-SL2

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-ASAP3

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-ASAP4

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-ASAP5

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-ASAP6

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-ASL1

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-HE1

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-HE2

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-HE3

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-HE4

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-SD1

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-SD2

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-SD3

ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-SL3

BanCap Asset Securitization Issuance Corporation, Mortgage Loan Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2006-1

Bravo Mortgage Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-1

Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc. Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-HE3

CS Home Equity Mortgage Trust Series 2006-3

CS Home Equity Mortgage Trust Series 2006-4

CS Home Equity Mortgage Trust Series 2006-5

CSFB Home Equity Asset Trust 2006-2

CS Home Equity Mortgage Trust Series 2006-1

CS Home Equity Mortgage Trust Series 2006-2

Credit Suisse Seasoned Loan Trust 2006-1

GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-S1

GSAMP Trust 2006-NC2

GSAMP Trust 2006-S2

GSAMP Trust 2006-S3

GSAMP Trust 2006-S4

GSAMP Trust 2006-S5

GSAMP Trust 2005-S6

GSAMP Trust 2006-SD2

GSAMP Trust 2006-SD3

GSAMP Trust 2006-SEA1

GSRPM Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-2
</TABLE>


(page)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                      <C>

                      Deal Name

MASTR Asset Backed Securities Trust 2006-AM1

MASTR Asset Backed Securities Trust 2006-AM3

Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation Series 2006-S1

Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation Series 2006-S2

Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation Series 2006-S3

Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation Series 2006-S4

Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation Series 2006-S5

Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc., Series 2006-HE1

Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc., Series 2006-HE2

Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc., Series 2006-HE3

Renaissance Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-1

Renaissance Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-2

Renaissance Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-3

Renaissance Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-4

ResMAE Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-1

Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-4

Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-S2

Soundview Home Loan Trust 2007-EQ2

Soundview Home Loan Trust 2006-NLC1
</TABLE>





EX-33 (f)
(logo) REGULUS

Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria

1.   Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100 - Asset Backed Securities, 17 C.F.R. Section
     229.1100-229.1123 ("Regulation AB"), Regulus Group LLC, for itself and its
     wholly-owned subsidiaries (individually and collectively "Regulus"), is
     responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria
     applicable to the remittance processing services it provides to customers
     who are issuers or servicers of asset backed securities transactions and
     who have requested confirmation of Regulus' compliance in connection with
     loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset
     backed securities transactions (the "Platform"). Remittance processing is a
     service whereby check payments that are remitted by mail to a post office
     box are collected, processed through a highly automated data capture
     system, and prepared for deposit to a bank account held by the beneficiary
     of the payment.

2.   The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB were used
     in Regulus' assessment of compliance. Regulus has concluded that the
     servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of
     Regulation AB are applicable to the servicing activities it performs with
     respect to the Platform (such criteria the "Applicable Servicing
     Criteria"). Regulus has concluded that the remainder of the servicing
     criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the
     activities it performs with respect to the Platform because Regulus does
     not participate in the servicing activities referenced by such servicing
     criteria.

3.   As of and for the year ending December 31, 2006, Regulus has complied in
     all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria set forth in
     Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB.

4.   KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
     report on Regulus' assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
     Criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2006. A copy of that
     attestation report is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

/s/ Kimberlee Clark
Kimberlee Clark
Chief Financial Officer

February 22, 2007


860 LATOUR COURT  NAPA, CA  94558  TEL: 707.254.4000  FAX: 707.254.4070
REGULUSGROUP.COM


(page)


(logo) REGULUS

Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance
with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria

1.   Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100 - Asset Backed Securities, 17 C.F.R. Section
     229.1100-229.1123 ("Regulation AB"), Regulus Group LLC, for itself and its
     wholly-owned subsidiaries (individually and collectively "Regulus"), is
     responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria
     applicable to the remittance processing services it provides to customers
     who are issuers or servicers of asset backed securities transactions and
     who have requested confirmation of Regulus' compliance in connection with
     loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset
     backed securities transactions (the "Platform"). Remittance processing is a
     service whereby check payments that are remitted by mail to a post office
     box are collected, processed through a highly automated data capture
     system, and prepared for deposit to a bank account held by the beneficiary
     of the payment.

2.   The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB were used
     in Regulus' assessment of compliance. Regulus has concluded that the
     servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of
     Regulation AB are applicable to the servicing activities it performs with
     respect to the Platform (such criteria the "Applicable Servicing
     Criteria"). Regulus has concluded that the remainder of the servicing
     criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the
     activities it performs with respect to the Platform because Regulus does
     not participate in the servicing activities referenced by such servicing
     criteria.

3.   As of and for the year ending December 31, 2006, Regulus has complied in
     all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria set forth in
     Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB.

/s/ Kimberlee Clark
Kimberlee Clark
Chief Financial Officer

February 22, 2007


860 LATOUR COURT  NAPA, CA  94558  TEL: 707.254.4000  FAX: 707.254.4070
REGULUSGROUP.COM


(page)


(logo) REGULUS


Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Item 1123

Pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, a review of the Regulus' activities
during the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") and of its
performance under the servicing agreement between Regulus and Ocwen Mortgage
(the "Servicing Agreement") has been made under the undersigned officer's
supervision. To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review,
Regulus has fulfilled its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

/s/ Kimberlee Clark
Kimberlee Clark
Chief Financial Officer

February 22, 2007


860 LATOUR COURT  NAPA, CA  94558  TEL: 707.254.4000  FAX: 707.254.4070
REGULUSGROUP.COM





EX-33 (g)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045-1951
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") provides this assessment of compliance with the following applicable
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform for the
period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other
asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing,
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding
transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or
any government sponsored entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d),
to the extent required in the related transaction agreements or required by the
Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the
Company, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii),
1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x),
1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which management has
determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with
respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

Third parties classified as vendors: With respect to servicing criteria
1122(d)(4)(i), the Company has engaged various vendors to handle certain Uniform
Commercial Code filing functions required by the servicing criteria ("vendors").
The Company has determined that none of the vendors is a "servicer" as defined
in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company elects to take responsibility
for assessing compliance with the portion of the servicing criteria applicable
to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of
Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations
("Interpretation 17.06"). The Company has policies and procedures in place to
provide reasonable assurance that each vendor's activities comply in all
material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The
Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements
to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria,
including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based on
Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the Period. In performing
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and
Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Other than as identified on Schedule A hereto, as of and for the Period, the
Company was in material compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Any
material instances of noncompliance by a vendor of which the Company is aware
and any material deficiency in the Company's policies and procedures to monitor
vendors' compliance that the Company has identified is specified on Schedule A
hereto.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of compliance as of
and for the Period.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By:/s/ Brian Bartlett
Brian Bartlett

Its:   Executive Vice President

Dated: March 1, 2007


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045-1951
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Schedule A

Material Instances of Noncompliance by the Company

1122(d)(3)(i)- Delinquency Reporting - During the reporting period, certain
monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the calculation and/or
the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets, which errors may or may not
have been material. All such errors were the result of data processing errors
and/or the mistaken interpretation of data provided by other parties
participating in the servicing function. All necessary adjustments to data
processing systems and/or interpretive clarifications have been made to correct
those errors and to remedy related procedures.

Material instances of Noncompliance by any Vendor

NONE

Material Deficiencies In Company's Policies and Procedures to Monitor Vendors'
Compliance

NONE





EX-33 (h)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045-1951
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") provides this assessment of compliance with the following applicable
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform for the
period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other
asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing,
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding
transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or
any government sponsored entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d),
to the extent required in the related transaction agreements or required by the
Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the
Company, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii),
1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x),
1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which management has
determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with
respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

Third parties classified as vendors: With respect to servicing criteria
1122(d)(4)(i), the Company has engaged various vendors to handle certain Uniform
Commercial Code filing functions required by the servicing criteria ("vendors").
The Company has determined that none of the vendors is a "servicer" as defined
in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company elects to take responsibility
for assessing compliance with the portion of the servicing criteria applicable
to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of
Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations
("Interpretation 17.06"). The Company has policies and procedures in place to
provide reasonable assurance that each vendor's activities comply in all
material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The
Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements
to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria,
including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based on
Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the Period. In performing
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and
Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Other than as identified on Schedule A hereto, as of and for the Period, the
Company was in material compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Any
material instances of noncompliance by a vendor of which the Company is aware
and any material deficiency in the Company's policies and procedures to monitor
vendors' compliance that the Company has identified is specified on Schedule A
hereto.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of compliance as of
and for the Period.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By:/s/ Brian Bartlett
Brian Bartlett

Its:   Executive Vice President

Dated: March 1, 2007


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045-1951
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Schedule A

Material Instances of Noncompliance by the Company

1122(d)(3)(i)- Delinquency Reporting - During the reporting period, certain
monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the calculation and/or
the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets, which errors may or may not
have been material. All such errors were the result of data processing errors
and/or the mistaken interpretation of data provided by other parties
participating in the servicing function. All necessary adjustments to data
processing systems and/or interpretive clarifications have been made to correct
those errors and to remedy related procedures.

Material instances of Noncompliance by any Vendor

NONE

Material Deficiencies In Company's Policies and Procedures to Monitor Vendors'
Compliance

NONE





EX-33 (i)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045-1951
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") provides this assessment of compliance with the following applicable
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform for the
period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other
asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing,
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding
transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or
any government sponsored entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d),
to the extent required in the related transaction agreements or required by the
Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the
Company, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii),
1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x),
1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which management has
determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with
respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

Third parties classified as vendors: With respect to servicing criteria
1122(d)(4)(i), the Company has engaged various vendors to handle certain Uniform
Commercial Code filing functions required by the servicing criteria ("vendors").
The Company has determined that none of the vendors is a "servicer" as defined
in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company elects to take responsibility
for assessing compliance with the portion of the servicing criteria applicable
to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of
Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations
("Interpretation 17.06"). The Company has policies and procedures in place to
provide reasonable assurance that each vendor's activities comply in all
material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The
Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements
to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria,
including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based on
Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the Period. In performing
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and
Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Other than as identified on Schedule A hereto, as of and for the Period, the
Company was in material compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Any
material instances of noncompliance by a vendor of which the Company is aware
and any material deficiency in the Company's policies and procedures to monitor
vendors' compliance that the Company has identified is specified on Schedule A
hereto.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of compliance as of
and for the Period.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By:/s/ Brian Bartlett
Brian Bartlett

Its:   Executive Vice President

Dated: March 1, 2007


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045-1951
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Schedule A

Material Instances of Noncompliance by the Company

1122(d)(3)(i)- Delinquency Reporting - During the reporting period, certain
monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the calculation and/or
the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets, which errors may or may not
have been material. All such errors were the result of data processing errors
and/or the mistaken interpretation of data provided by other parties
participating in the servicing function. All necessary adjustments to data
processing systems and/or interpretive clarifications have been made to correct
those errors and to remedy related procedures.

Material instances of Noncompliance by any Vendor

NONE

Material Deficiencies In Company's Policies and Procedures to Monitor Vendors'
Compliance

NONE





EX-33 (j)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55414


Appendix I


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the
period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006, for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the
Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The
Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria. In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth
by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the
Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By: /s/ Shari L. Gillund
Shari L. Gillund

Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: March 1, 2007





EX-34 (a)
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
10 Tenth Street, Northwest
Suite 1400
Atlanta, GA 30309-3851
Telephone (678) 419 1000
Fascimile (678) 419 1239
www.pwc.com


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of
Assurant, Inc.:


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with 1122(d)(2)(vi) and
1122(d)(4)(xi) of Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that American Security
Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and Safeco Financial
Institution Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc., collectively the
"Asserting Party") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all
mortgage loan-tracking transactions for which the Asserting Party served as a
Vendor on behalf of Servicers for such asset-backed securities transactions that
were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"), as of
December 31, 2006 and for the year then ended, excluding (i) criteria
1122(d)(1)(i) through 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i) through 1122(d)(2)(v),
1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) through 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) through
1122(d)(4)(x) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii) through 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Asserting
Party has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform and (ii), criterion 1122(d)(4)(xii), which relates to
servicing activities that are applicable to the Platform, but are excluded from
the scope of management's assertion and are not reported on herein. Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred
prior to or subsequent to our tests that may


1


(page)


have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Asserting Party complied with
the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
February 23, 2007


2





EX-34 (b)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-5212


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
The Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust
Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix
I, that the Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (collectively the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e.,
transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed
securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions, sponsored or issued by any government sponsored
entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(iii),
1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)
(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)
(4)(xiii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv ), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of
and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible
for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's
compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance
with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the
selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during
the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our
tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by
the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected
transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides
a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

As described in management's assertion included in the accompanying Appendix I,
for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), the
Company has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these
servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not
considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the
Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the
servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation
17.06 of the SEC


(page)


(logo) KPMG


Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone
Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06,
the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed
to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all
material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The
Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC
requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria
as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to
the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria, including servicing criteria 1122 (d)(2)(i),
1122 (d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) for which compliance is determined based on
Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2007


KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.





EX-34 (c)
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Suite 1800
2001 Ross Ave.
Dallas TX 75201-2997
Telephone (214) 999 1400
Facsimile (214) 754 7991
www.pwc.com


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of The First American Corporation:

We have examined First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P.'s (the
"Company" and an indirect subsidiary of The First American Corporation),
compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for residential
mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the
residential tax service provider (the "Platform") described in the accompanying
Report on Assessment of Compliance, as of December 31, 2006 and for the year
then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-(iii), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(iv),
1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(x) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv)-(xv), which the
Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed
by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance
arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests
that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the
Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing
criteria.

Our examination disclosed the following material instance of noncompliance with
the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of Regulation AB
applicable to the Company during year ended December 31, 2006. Account
reconciliations for all asset-backed securities related bank accounts were not
prepared within 30 calendar days after the bank statement cutoff date, or such
other number of days specified in the transaction agreements as required by Item
1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of Regulation AB.

In our opinion, except for the material instance of noncompliance described in
the preceding paragraph, First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P.
complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2006 for all loans for residential mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential tax
service provider, in all material respects.

/s/ Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP

February 28, 2007





EX-34 (d)
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
300 Madison Avenue
New York NY 10017
Telephone (646) 471-3000
www.pwc.com


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of Residential Capital, LLC:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance with Regulation AB Item 1122
Servicing Criteria, that GMAC Mortgage, LLC (the "Company"), a subsidiary
of Residential Capital, LLC, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the
GMACM Private Platform (the "Platform") as of and for the year then ended
December 31, 2006, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii); 1122(d)(2)(iv);
1122(d)(3)(i),(ii) and 1122(d)(4)(i),(ii), which the Company has determined are
not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the
Platform. Appendix A to management's assertion identifies the individual asset-
backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the
Platform.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred
prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or
amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria.


In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006, for the GMACM Private Platform is fairly stated, in all
material respects.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
March 6, 2007





EX-34 (e)
(logo) Crowe
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Member Horwath International




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Audit Committee
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
West Palm Beach, Florida


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report,
that Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for the Residential Mortgage Loans Platform (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria
1122(1)(iii) and 1122(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable
to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. The
Platform consists of the asset-backed transactions and securities defined by
management in Appendix B of Management's Report. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based on the aforementioned applicable servicing
criteria.


/s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC


Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 8, 2007





EX-34 (f)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
1601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members
Regulus Group LLC:

We have examined management's assessment for those customers that management has
informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the
accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers
of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios
that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Regulus Group LLC has determined
that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, PA
February 22, 2007

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member firm of KPMG
International, a Swiss cooperative.





EX-34 (g)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60801-5212

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
The Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association:

We have examined the compliance of the Corporate Trust Services division of
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Company) with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation
AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other
asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing,
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding
transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or
any government sponsored entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria
1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v),
1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi),
1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

As described in the accompanying management's Assessment of Compliance With
Applicable Servicing Criteria, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i), the Company
has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these
servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not
considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the
Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the
servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation
17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available
Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by
Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, in the U.S. member firm
of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperation.

(page)

(logo) KPMG

procedures in place designed to provide assurance that the vendors' activities
comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each
vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC
requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria
as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to
the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.

Our examination disclosed material noncompliance with criterion 1122(d)(3)(i),
as applicable to the Company during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006.
Certain monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the
calculation and/or the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets.

In our opinion, except for the material non-compliance described above, the
Company complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing
criteria, including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based
on Interpretation 17.06 as discussed above, as of and for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, IL 60601
March 1, 2007





EX-34 (h)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60801-5212

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
The Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association:

We have examined the compliance of the Corporate Trust Services division of
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Company) with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation
AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other
asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing,
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding
transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or
any government sponsored entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria
1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v),
1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi),
1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

As described in the accompanying management's Assessment of Compliance With
Applicable Servicing Criteria, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i), the Company
has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these
servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not
considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the
Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the
servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation
17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available
Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by
Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, in the U.S. member firm
of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.

(page)

(logo) KPMG

procedures in place designed to provide assurance that the vendors' activities
comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each
vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC
requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria
as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to
the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.

Our examination disclosed material noncompliance with criterion 1122(d)(3)(i),
as applicable to the Company during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006.
Certain monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the
calculation and/or the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets.

In our opinion, except for the material non-compliance described above, the
Company complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing
criteria, including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based
on Interpretation 17.06 as discussed above, as of and for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, IL 60601
March 1, 2007





EX-34 (i)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60801-5212

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
The Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association:

We have examined the compliance of the Corporate Trust Services division of
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Company) with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation
AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other
asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing,
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding
transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or
any government sponsored entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria
1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v),
1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi),
1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

As described in the accompanying management's Assessment of Compliance With
Applicable Servicing Criteria, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i), the Company
has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these
servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not
considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the
Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the
servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation
17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available
Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by
Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, in the U.S. member firm
of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.

(page)

(logo) KPMG

procedures in place designed to provide assurance that the vendors' activities
comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each
vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC
requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria
as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to
the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.

Our examination disclosed material noncompliance with criterion 1122(d)(3)(i),
as applicable to the Company during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006.
Certain monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the
calculation and/or the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets.

In our opinion, except for the material non-compliance described above, the
Company complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing
criteria, including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based
on Interpretation 17.06 as discussed above, as of and for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, IL 60601
March 1, 2007





EX-34 (j)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-5212

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
The Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank National Association:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix
I, that the Document Custody section of the Corporate Trust Services division of
Wells Fargo Bank National Association complied with the servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
Platform) as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management
has determined that servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) are
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, and that
all other servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the
document custody services provided by the Company with respect to the Platform.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the period ended December 31,
2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 1, 2007

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member firm of KPMG
International, a Swiss cooperative.





EX-35 (a)
(logo) GMAC Mortgage


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

ACE2006-SL1


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby
certify that:

1.      A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all
material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 6th
day of March 2007.


By:     /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
Title:  Executive Vice President


GMAC Mortgage, LLC
500 Enterprise Road
Horsham, PA 19044

www.gmacmortgage.com





EX-35 (b)
(logo) OCWEN


ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

March 8, 2007

RE: ACE 2006 SL1

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen Loan
Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance statement
pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance with the
servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set forth in
Regulation AB, 17 CFR Section 229.1100, et seq., ("Regulation AB"). In this
regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief in all material respects.

1.   A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period,
     and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated
     January 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my supervision.

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all of
     its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
     Reporting Period.

By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name:  Ronald M. Faris
Title: President


Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
1661 Worthington Road Suite 100
Centrepark West
West Palm Beach, FL 33409





EX-35 (c)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 12, 2007

Ace Securities Corporation
AMACAR GROUP
6525 Morrison Boulevard, Suite 318
Charlotte, NC 28211

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan
Trust, Series 2006-SL1

Per Section 4.15 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 1/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)     a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year
        or portion thereof and of such Servicer's performance under this
        Agreement, or such other applicable agreement in the case of an
        Additional Servicer, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)     to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer, in
        all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if
        there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
        respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the
        nature and status thereof.


Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary





EX-35 (d)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 26, 2007

Ace Securities Corporation
AMACAR GROUP
6525 Morrison Boulevard, Suite 318
Charlotte, NC 28211

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan
Trust, Series 2006-SL1

Per Section 4.15 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 1/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:


(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such Servicer's performance under this Agreement has
     been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement in all material
     respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there has been a
     failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifying
     each such failure known to such officer and the nature and status thereof.



Certified By:
/s/ Scott Strack
Scott Strack, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary