alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John J. Dee, Chief Financial Office and Senior Vice President of Paragon Real Estate and Equity
Investment Trust certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Paragon Real Estate Equity and Investment
Trust (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the Registrant and we have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the Registrants board of trustees (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: February 17, 2005 By:
    
    /s/ John J. DeeJohn J. DeeChief Financial Officer andSenior Vice President(Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-69721, 333-64519 and 333-42167 and
333-34584) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-90702, 33-90726, 33-90732, 333-3408,
333-25217, 333-41067, 333-45063, 333-74141, 333-49822 and 333-33894), of PRI
Automation, Inc. of our report dated November 21, 2000, except as to the
information presented in Note V, which is as of December 14, 2000, relating
to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 19, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Payment Data Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |     |                                                    
|------------------ | --- | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2007 | By: | /s/ Michael R. Long                                
|                   |     | Michael R. Long                                    
|                   |     | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-51130

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PASCACIO CARMONA-ORTEGA, also known as Jesus Carmona-Ortiz, also known as Jesus Jose Carmona, also known as Gerardo Pena-Lopez,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas EP-01-CR-1027-ALL-DB

May 30, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Pascacio Carmona-Ortega appeals a 46-month sentence imposed

following his guilty plea to a charge of illegally entering and

being found in the United States after deportation, a violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Carmona -Ortega argues that the district court should have1 United State s v. Yanez-Huerta , 207 F.3d 746, 748 (5th Cir.

2000).

2 United States v. McIntosh

, 280 F.3d 479 , 485 (5th Cir. 2002). departed downward in sentencing him under the guidelines, on the

ground of cultural assimilation. The record shows that the district

court did not base its decision upon an erroneous belief that it

lacked the authority to depart. 1

Carmona-Ortega conten ds that the district court should have

sentenced him under the guidelines that became effective on

November 1, 200 1, even though he was sentenced two days prior to

that date. His argument that the relevant guideline is retroactive

because it is merely clarifying lacks merit because the amendment’s

purpose was to make substantive changes in the punishment for 18

U.S.C. § 1326 offenses. 2

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunterra Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and as of the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ NICHOLAS J. BENSON 
|Nicholas J. Benson     
|Chief Executive Officer
|Dated:February 14, 2006
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0107. JAMES BAUGHCUM v. THE STATE. 

In 2004, James Baughcum was convicted by a jury of two counts of aggravated

childmolestation and five counts of childmolestation. Baughcum’s convictions were

affirmed on appeal. See Baughcum v. State, 277 Ga. App. 799 (627 SE2d 855)

(2006). In 2016, he filed a “Motion and Notice for Hearing to Correct and Modify

Void Sentence.” The trial court denied the motion on June 29, 2016. Baughcum then

filed this application for discretionary appeal on September 26, 2016. We, however,

lack jurisdiction.

 A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct

a void sentence only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in

fact, void. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217, n. 1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg

v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). Ordinarily, if a party applies

for discretionary review of a directly appealable order, we grant the application under

OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general rule, however, the application must

be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-

6-35 (d); Hill v State, 204 Ga App 582, 582-583 (420 SE2d 393) (1992). Because

Baughcum filed his application 89 days after the trial court entered its order, it is

untimely. Furthermore, Baughcum has not asserted that his sentence is one not

allowed by law and thus has not raised a valid void sentence claim. Accordingly, this

October 18, 2016
application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/18/2016
#### Maurice JUGGINS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Janet WURIE, Nurse Practitioner; Stan Berry, Sheriff; Hardy, Nurse; Malik, Dr.; Quintana, Lt., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 08-6004.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 14, 2008.

Decided: May 1, 2008.

*349Maurice Juggins, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Juggins, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). In his informal appellate brief, Juggins failed to address the district court’s basis for dismissing his claims against Janet Wurie, Dr. Malik, and Nurse Hardy. Therefore, Juggins has waived appellate review of those claims. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.”). We have reviewed the record as to Juggins’ claims against the remaining Defendants and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Juggins v. Wurie,*No. 1:07-cv01126-TSE-TCB (E.D.Va. Nov. 23, 2007). We also deny Juggins’ motions for appointment of counsel and dismissal of payments for filing fees. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0606

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER I TOULOUSE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 2, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 26 2021

04/26/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0606
#### Donald Gennett, Respondent, v Leslie M. Gennett, Also Known as Leslie J. Maiello, Appellant.

[664 NYS2d 873]

Spain, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Lynch, J.), entered November 27, 1996 in Schenectady County, which granted judgment in favor of plaintiff on the ground that defendant failed to comply with a prior court order.

Plaintiff commenced this action for a divorce in October 1993 based on allegations of cruel and inhuman treatment. By order dated September 30,1996, Supreme Court, *inter alia,*conditionally granted plaintiff’s motion to preclude defendant from opposing the grounds for divorce because defendant had failed to comply with plaintiff’s discovery demands, unless defendant produced the requested documents within 30 days. The record indicates that, in response to the order, defendant did provide plaintiff with some documentation, although it is unclear exactly what was provided. By letter to Supreme Court dated November 21, 1996, plaintiff, proceeding *pro se,*claimed that defendant failed to comply with the court’s conditional order *599and requested a “default judgment”. On November 25, 1996 defendant received a copy of plaintiffs letter, and submitted a letter to Supreme Court on November 26, 1996, via facsimile, advising the court that she received no notice of motion in connection with plaintiffs request for a default judgment and, in any event, had complied with the discovery order. Supreme Court issued an order dated November 26, 1996 deeming issues with respect to grounds to be resolved, precluding defendant from offering any opposition to the grounds for divorce. Defendant appeals, contending that she was not given an opportunity to be heard prior to the order being made.

Plaintiffs “application for default judgment” based upon defendant’s alleged failure to comply with the conditional order should have been made by notice of motion (see, CPLR 3215 [g]; *see also,*Siegel, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3126:10, at 763). Although defendant was entitled to notice of plaintiffs application for a default judgment, her proper remedy was to move before Supreme Court to vacate the judgment rather than to file a direct appeal *(see,*CPLR 5015 [a]; 5511; *see, e.g., Soule v Lozada,*240 AD2d 897, 898; *Smith v City of New York,*238 AD2d 574; *cf., Schwenk v St. Peter's Hosp.,*215 AD2d 906, *lv dismissed*86 NY2d 838). In view of defendant’s failure to make such a motion, we are compelled to dismiss this appeal.

Mikoll, J. P., White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Warren F. Kruger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


April 20, 2005                        /s/ Warren F. Kruger
                                      --------------------------------
                                      Warren F. Kruger, Chief Executive Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered
filed as part of the Report.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy; DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent to grant a revocable, nonassignable, exclusive license in the United States to Visible Welding LLC, to practice the Government owned invention described in U.S. Patent No. 9,307,156:                               ( print page 48500)                            LONGWAVE INFRARED IMAGING OF A HIGH TEMPERATURE HIGH INTENSITY LIGHT SOURCE.                    

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license has fifteen (15) days from the date of this notice to file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any.

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Code 00L, 9500 MacArthur Boulevard, West Bethesda, MD 20817-5700.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph Teter Ph.D., Director, Technology Transfer Office, Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Code 00T, 9500 MacArthur Boulevard, West Bethesda, MD 20817-5700, telephone 301 227-4299.

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404)

Dated: October 12, 2017.

A.M. Nichols,

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-22576 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
v071123_ex10-1
















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































    SCHEDULE
      3.1(s)

     

    FEES

     

    In
      consideration for the services rendered and/or to be rendered by BC and/or
      SKB,
      upon the initial closing and each subsequent closing of the sale of Debentures,
      SKB shall receive the following:

     

    1. The
      right
      to receive shares of Common Stock equal to 12% of the number of shares into
      which the Debentures sold at such closing are then convertible at the conversion
      price thereof (which shall include the same right to registration/price
      protection/full ratchet anti-dilution, and other protective terms as are
      provided the Debentures) at a purchase price of 1/10th
      of one
      cent per share of Common Stock, which shall be issued to BC (or its designee)
      at
      such closing, and which right to purchase shall be exercisable for a period
      of
      two years from the initial closing.

     

    2. Upon
      the
      exercise of any warrants issued in connection with the Debentures, 5% of the
      warrant exercise price of al warrants exercised, in cash. All BC shares shall
      have piggy-back registration rights in all subsequent registrations of the
      Company until registration for resale shall no longer be required. All cash
      payments hereunder shall be made at Closing by wire transfer to BC (or its
      designee) within 15 days of the date upon which such amount becomes
      due.

     

    To
      illustrate, each $4,000,000 of Debentures sold, BC, or its designee shall have
      the right to:

     

    (a) purchase
      27,428,571 shares of the Company’s Common Stock ($4,000,000/$0.0175) amultiplied
      by 0.12 - at an aggregate cost of $27,429 ($0.001 per share); and

     

    (b) receive
      a
      cash fee, upon exercise of all of the warrants issued in connection with the
      sale of $4,000,000 Debentures, $142,857.

     

    2.
      Upon
      the initial closing, SKB and RS shall each receive the folowing:

     

    (a) economy
      class round trip plane tickets for SKB and RS to fly to and from New York,
      USA
      and Abuja, Nigeria; and 

     

    (b)
       prepaid
      4-day hotel accommodations at the Hilton Hotel in Abuja, Nigeria
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 202 (Friday, October 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22810]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15338 and #15339; Georgia Disaster Number GA-
00101]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Georgia

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for public assistance only for the state of Georgia 
(FEMA-4338-DR), dated 09/28/2017.
    Incident: Hurricane Irma.
    Incident Period: 09/07/2017 through 09/20/2017.

DATES: Issued on 10/11/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/27/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/28/2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for private non-profit organizations in the state of 
Georgia, dated 09/28/2017, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Echols, Effingham, Lowndes, Tift

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera.
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-22810 Filed 10-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P