alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cynthia Reyes MARROQUIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50250

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 6, 2011.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Nancy Blair Barohn, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Cynthia Reyes Marroquin appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed for her conviction of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine and her concurrent 60-month sentences imposed for her convictions of two counts of aiding and abetting the possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine. She *392argues that the district court clearly erred by finding that she had not met her burden of showing that she qualified for a safety valve adjustment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. *See United States v. Flanagan,*80 F.3d 143, 145-47 (5th Cir.1996).

Setting aside that Marroquin cites no authority holding that the Government was bound by representations made during plea negotiations when no plea agreement was ever reached, her argument that the Government had agreed prior to trial that the safety valve adjustment was warranted ignores that the applicability of the adjustment was a matter for the district court to decide and was not subject to the Government’s discretion. *See*§ 501.2(a) (noting that the district court shall grant a safety valve adjustment “if the court finds” that the defendant satisfies the applicable criteria). Contrary to her assertion, the denial of the adjustment was not premised solely upon the credibility determinations of the interviewing detective; rather, the district court determined, based upon evidence adduced during trial and at sentencing, that Marroquin had not truthfully provided all information and evidence known to her during her pretrial debriefing. *See*§ 3553(f)(5); § 5C1.2(a)(5). This court has rejected the pi'oposition that a defendant whose sentencing hearing has commenced may cure her failure to fully debrief for safety valve purposes by doing so during a suspension of the proceedings. *See United States v. Brenes,*250 F.3d 290, 293 (5th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Poseidis,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ending  November  30,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Louis
Pardo dit  Pardau,  Chief  Executive  Officer  (or  equivalent  thereof)  of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that,  to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                            /s/ Louis Pardo dit Pardau
                            ------------------------------------------
                            Louis Pardo dit Pardau, Chief Executive Officer
                            (or equivalent thereof)

Dated: 1/9/03
Schedule of Omitted Documents



 Exhibit 10.5 

Schedule of Omitted Documents 

The following loan agreements have not been filed as an exhibit pursuant to Instruction 2 of Item 601 of Regulation S-K; these documents
are substantially identical in all material respects to Exhibit 10.2 to this Form 8-K: 
  

	 	1.	Revolving Promissory Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of Bank of America, N.A. in the amount of $34,074,074, dated December 19, 2014. 


 

	 	2.	Revolving Promissory Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of Compass Bank in the amount of $22,716,049, dated December 19, 2014. 


 

	 	3.	Revolving Promissory Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in the amount of $34,074,074, dated December 19, 2014. 


 

	 	4.	Revolving Promissory Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of SunTrust Bank in the amount of $34,074,074, dated December 19, 2014. 


 

	 	5.	Revolving Promissory Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of Cadence Bank, N.A. in the amount of $17,037,037, dated December 19, 2014. 


 

	 	6.	Revolving Promissory Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of Fifth Third Bank in the amount of $19,876,543, dated December 19, 2014. 


 

	 	7.	Revolving Promissory Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of Comerica Bank in the amount of $11,358,025, dated December 19, 2014. 


 

	 	8.	Revolving Promissory Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of The Huntington National Bank in the amount of $8,518,519, dated December 19, 2014. 


 

	 	9.	Revolving Promissory Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of Seaside National Bank & Trust in the amount of $5,679,012, dated December 19, 2014. 


The following loan agreements have not been filed as an exhibit pursuant to Instruction 2 of Item 601 of Regulation S-K; these documents
are substantially identical in all material respects to Exhibit 10.3 to this Form 8-K: 
  

	 	1.	Term Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of Bank of America, N.A. in the amount of $25,925,926, dated December 19, 2014. 

  

	 	2.	Term Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of Compass Bank in the amount of $17,283,951, dated December 19, 2014. 

  

	 	3.	Term Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in the amount of $25,925,926, dated December 19, 2014. 









	 	4.	Term Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of SunTrust Bank in the amount of $25,925,926, dated December 19, 2014. 

  

	 	5.	Term Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of Cadence Bank, N.A. in the amount of $12,962,963, dated December 19, 2014. 

  

	 	6.	Term Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of Fifth Third Bank in the amount of $15,123,457, dated December 19, 2014. 

  

	 	7.	Term Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of Comerica Bank in the amount of $8,641,975, dated December 19, 2014. 

  

	 	8.	Term Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of The Huntington National Bank in the amount of $6,481,481, dated December 19, 2014. 

  


	 	9.	Term Note of CHP Partners, L.P. in favor of Seaside National Bank & Trust in the amount of $4,320,988, dated December 19, 2014.
H. R. 3562 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To designate the federally occupied building located at 1220 Echelon Parkway 

in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ‘‘James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, Michael 

Schwerner, and Roy K. Moore Federal Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. BUILDING DESIGNATION. 

The Administrator of General Services shall ensure that the 

federally occupied building located at 1220 Echelon Parkway in 

Jackson, Mississippi, is known and designated as the ‘‘James 

Chaney, Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner, and Roy K. Moore 

Federal Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

With respect to the period in which the building referred to 

in section 1 is federally occupied, any reference in a law, map, 

regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States 

to that building shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James 

Chaney, Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner, and Roy K. Moore 

Federal Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Accelerize New Media, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, as the
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
March 31, 2009








/s/ Brian
Ross





Brian
Ross


President,
Chief Executive Officer


And
Principal Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7211

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID WILBERT SHANTON, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,

District Judge. (CR-89-250, CA-01-81)

Submitted: December 11, 2002 Decided: January 3, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Wilbert Shanton, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver

Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West

Virginia; Sherry L. Muncy, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

 Shanton filed his notice of appeal more than sixty days

after the district court entered its order on the docket, see Fed.

R. App. P. 4(a)(1), and failed to obtain an extension or reopening

of the appeal period, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), (6). We have

jurisdiction to consider this appeal, however, because the district

court’s order was not entered on a separate judgment as required by

Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. See Hughes v. Halifax County Sch. Bd., 823

F.2d 832, 835 (4th Cir. 1987) (finding that five-page order did not

satisfy separate judgment where order contained procedural history

of case and district court’s reasoning). Thus, the appeal period

never began to run, and Shanton’s appeal may not be dismissed as

untimely. See Quinn v. Haynes, 234 F.3d 837, 843 (4th Cir. 2000),

cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1024 (2001).

2

PER CURIAM:

David Wilbert Shanton, Sr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000).* An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final

order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims

dismissed by a district court solely on procedural grounds unless

the movant can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would

find it debatable whether the [motion] states a valid claim of the

denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason

would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in

its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.)

(quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert.

denied, 122 S. Ct. 318 (2001). We have reviewed the record and
3

conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Shanton

has not made the requisite showing. See Slack, 529 U.S. at 484.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B); Slack, 529 U.S. at 484. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Dex Media, Inc. as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
December 11, 2009
    
    
    
    Steven M. Blondy
Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
December 11, 2009
  5
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

March 2, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00058

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH CURTIS ANDREWS, DECEASED

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 04

- 0239

- CVW Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record wa s due to be filed with this court on February 18, 2020

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1. After the due date , court reporter Karen L. D. Schoeve filed a first notification of late reporter’s record. She request ed a ninety

- day extension of time to file the record beginning on February 23, 2020

. The request is GRANTED IN PART . The reporter’s record is due on March 19, 2020

. See id. R. 35.3(c) (limiting an exten sion in an ordinary appeal to thirty days).

If the reporter’s record is not filed with this court by March 19, 2020 , any requests for additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written status report.

The report must describe th e transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of pages edited, proofread, and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks).

The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond the requested date.

A preferred form for the status report, with an acc ompanying example, is attached to this
order.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand a nd affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of March, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22599]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-053]


Certain Aluminum Foil From the People's Republic of China: 
Deferral of Preliminary Determination of the Less-Than-Fair-Value 
Investigation--Correction Notice

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Applicable October 18, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Kearney at (202) 482-0167, AD/CVD 
Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On October 12, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published a notice of the deferral of the preliminary determination in 
the less-than-fair-value investigation of aluminum foil from the 
People's Republic of China (PRC).\1\ In the Deferral Notice, the 
Department inadvertently published an incorrect date of the deferred 
preliminary determination.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's Republic of 
China: Deferral of Preliminary Determination of the Less-Than-Fair-
Value Investigation, 82 FR 47481 (October 12, 2017) (Deferral 
Notice).
    \2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Correction

    The Department expects to issue the preliminary determination no 
later than November 30, 2017.

    Dated: October 12, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-22599 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[No. 67335-1-I.

Division One.

November 5, 2012.]

#### Bellevue Square, LLC, *Appellant,*v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 10-2-12868-9, Julie A. Spector, J., entered May 31, 2011. *Reversed*and *remanded with instructions*by unpublished opinion per

Ellington, J. Pro Tern.,

concurred in by Leach, C.J., and Grosse, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       7,941,184
<SECURITIES>                                11,393,714
<RECEIVABLES>                                  112,143
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    310,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           190,938,771
<PP&E>                                         224,862
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,613
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,140,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,844,318
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,784
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,312,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,140,004
<SALES>                                      1,121,085
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,121,085
<CGS>                                          878,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  878,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               866,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              86,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                232,569
<INCOME-TAX>                                    89,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            143,569
<DISCONTINUED>                                  29,093
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   172,662
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.000


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23045]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; National Science Board

    The National Science Board's Committee on Honorary Awards, pursuant 
to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation 
Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine 
Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a 
teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, 
as follows:

TIME AND DATE:  October 30, 2017 from 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. EDT.

PLACE:  This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National 
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  (1) Subcommittee Chair's opening remarks; 
(2) Review and discuss candidates for the 2018 National Science Board 
Honorary Awards--the Vannevar Bush Award and the NSB Public Service 
Award; and subcommittee Chair's closing remarks.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Nadine Lymn, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e08e8c998d8ea08e9386ce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="38565441555678564b5e165f574e">[email protected]</span></a>, (703) 292-7000. Meeting information and updates may be 
found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/notices.jsp#sunshine. Please 
refer to the National Science Board Web site www.nsf.gov/nsb for 
general information.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the NSB Office.
[FR Doc. 2017-23045 Filed 10-19-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
Statement  of  Financial  Condition at March 31, 2000 (unaudited)is qualified in
its  entirety  by  reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          36
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       667
<OTHER-SE>                                    (631)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             81964
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (81964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (81964)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (81964)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>