alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3211 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide that the percentage 

increase applied to benefits each year as a cost-of-living increase under 

such title shall in no case be less than the percentage increase in 

compensation of Members of Congress specified for such year under 

section 31 of title 2, United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2009 

Mr. KAGEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide 

that the percentage increase applied to benefits each 

year as a cost-of-living increase under such title shall 

in no case be less than the percentage increase in compensation of Members of Congress specified for such 

year under section 31 of title 2, United States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cost of Living Equity 

5 Act’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3211 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT TO PERCENTAGE INCREASES IN BEN2 EFITS UNDER TITLE II OF THE SOCIAL SECU3 RITY ACT TO ENSURE THAT SUCH INCREASES 

4 ARE IN NO CASE LESS THAN PERCENTAGE IN5 CREASES IN COMPENSATION OF MEMBERS 

6 OF CONGRESS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 215(i)(2)(A) of the Social 

8 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 415(i)(2)(A)) is amended by add9 ing at the end the following new clause: 

10 ‘‘(iv) Notwithstanding clause (ii), the Commissioner 

11 shall, effective with the month of December of each year 

12 as provided in subparagraph (B), irrespective of whether 

13 the base quarter in that year is a cost of living computa14 tion quarter, apply and adjust the increases described in 

15 subclauses (I), (II), and (III) of clause (ii) as necessary 

16 so as to result in a percentage increase in the amounts 

17 described in such subclauses (including each of those 

18 amounts as previously increased under this subparagraph) 

19 which is not less than the percentage increase in com20 pensation of Members of Congress specified under section 

21 31(2) of title 2, United States Code, for the first applica22 ble pay period after such month to which such increase 

23 applies (as determined without regard to any other appli24 cable provision of law affecting such compensation). Any 

25 percentage increase determined under this clause shall be 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3211 IH

1 treated as a percentage increase determined under clause 

2 (ii).’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply with respect to increases deter5 mined under section 215(i)(2)(A) of the Social Security 

6 Act occurring after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7519

MCKENZIE COREY SHELTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(4:12-cv-03193-RBH)

Submitted: March 21, 2014 Decided: March 26, 2014

Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

McKenzie Corey Shelton, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

McKenzie Corey Shelton seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Shelton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny Shelton’s motions for copies and a transcript at 

government expense, deny a certificate of appealability, and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 
3

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Lynch  Interactive
Corporation  (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Mario
J. Gabelli, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  hereby certifies,  pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                  /s/
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Mario J. Gabelli
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 16, 2005



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



<PAGE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:
    /s/ John J. DeeJohn J. DeeChief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3281 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out demonstration 

projects related to providing care for veterans in rural areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2009 

Mr. RODRIGUEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out 

demonstration projects related to providing care for veterans in rural areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON ALTER4 NATIVES FOR EXPANDING CARE FOR VET5 ERANS IN RURAL AREAS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Af7 fairs, through the Director of the Office of Rural Health, 

8 shall carry out demonstration projects to examine the fea9 sibility and advisability of alternatives for expanding care 

10 for veterans in rural areas, including the following: 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3281 IH

1 (1) Establishing a partnership between the De2 partment of Veterans Affairs and the Centers for 

3 Medicare and Medicaid Services of the Department 

4 of Health and Human Services to coordinate care 

5 for veterans in rural areas at critical access hospitals 

6 (as designated or certified under section 1820 of the 

7 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i–4)). 

8 (2) Establishing a partnership between the De9 partment of Veterans Affairs and the Department of 

10 Health and Human Services to coordinate care for 

11 veterans in rural areas at community health centers. 

12 (3) Expanding coordination between the De13 partment of Veterans Affairs and the Indian Health 

14 Service to expand care for Indian veterans. 

15 (b) GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION.—The Secretary of 

16 Veterans Affairs shall ensure that the demonstration 

17 projects carried out under subsection (a) are located at 

18 facilities that are geographically distributed throughout 

19 the United States. 

20 (c) REPORT.—Not later than two years after the date 

21 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans 

22 Affairs shall submit a report on the results of the dem23 onstration projects conducted under subsection (a) to— 

24 (1) the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and the 

25 Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3281 IH

1 (2) the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and the 

2 Committee on Appropriations of the House of Rep3 resentatives. 

4 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

5 are authorized to be appropriated $350,000,000 for each 

6 of fiscal years 2009 through 2011 to carry out this sec7 tion. 

Æ 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-18-01128-CR

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 17-CR-0916

Style: Lonnie Gene Kinnett

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: March 6, 2021

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Motion for Rehearing and/or Motion for En Banc Reconsideration

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: February 25, 2021

Number of previous extensions granted: 2

Date Requested: 21 days

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: March 18, 2021

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge's signature: /s/ April Farris

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: March 11, 2021
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intermost Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andy
Lin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





                                            /s/ Andy Lin
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Andy Lin
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2003
[No. 41926-2-II.

Division Two.

October 24, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kiyoshi Alan Higashi, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 10-1-01901-6, Rosanne Buckner, J., entered March 11, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Worswick, C.J.,

concurred in by Hunt and Van Deren, JJ.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT R OY WARDEN,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt, v. KATHLEEN R OB INSON, individually and in he r c a

pa c ity a s Assista

nt C hie f of Polic e ; e t a l., De fe nda

nts-Appe lle e s. No. 14-15803 D.C . No. 4:13-c v-00283-DC B M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na David C . B ury , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 27, 2016 * * B e fore : TASHIM A , SILVER M AN, a nd M . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. R oy W arde n a

ppe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t

c ourt’ s sum

m a ry judgm e nt a

nd dism issa l orde r in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c t ion a lle g ing va rious c la im s a

rising from his re m ova l from

a public pa rk a nd a rre st a t a c ity c ounc il m e e t ing. W e have



# FIL ED OCT 05 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo a dism i ssa l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1915(e )(2). Barre n v . Harrington , 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th C ir. 1998) (orde r). W e va c ate and re m and. The distric t c ourt dismisse d de fe nda nts W a lkup, Koz a c hik, M iranda , R ankin, Rioja s, Villa s e nor, C ouc h, a nd the C i ty

of Tuc son be c a

use W arde n fa ile d to c o m ply with Fe de ra l R

ule of C ivil Proc e dure 8. Howe ve r, in his First Am e nde d C om pla int, W arde n se t forth spe c ific fa c t ua l a lle gations a ga inst the se de fe nda nts, inc l uding the ir unla

wful c onduc t a

nd W arde n’ s re sulting injurie s. W arde n a lso se t forth five le ga l c la im s, a n d a lle ge d whic h c o nduc t supporte d e a c h c la im . Se e Be ll Atl. C

orp. v . Tw ombly , 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (Fe d . R . C i v. P. 8(a )(2) re quire s only

“ a short a nd pla in sta

te m e nt of thec la im showing tha t the ple a de r is e ntitle d to re l ie f, in orde r to givethe de fe n da nt fa ir notic e of what the . . . c la im is and the grounds upon which it re sts” (c ita tions a nd inte rna l quota

tion m arks om i tte d)). Ac c ordingly , we va c ate the judgm e nt a s to the se de fe nda nts a nd re m and for furthe r proc e e dings. W e do not va c ate the distric t c ourt’ s sum m ary judgm e nt for de fe nda

nt R obinson be c a

use on a ppe a l W arde n doe s not c ha lle n ge the orde r gra nting sum m ary judgm e nt. W e do not c onside r issue s a nd a rgum e nts inc orporate d by re fe re nc e on 1 4 - 1 5 8 0 3 2a

ppe a l, se eAc o s ta-Hue rta v . Este lle , 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th C i r. 1992), or m atte rs not spe c ific a lly

and distinc tly

ra ise d a nd a rgue d in theope n ing brie f, se ePadge tt v . W right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009). The pa rtie s sha ll be ar the ir own c osts on a ppe a l. V ACAT E D and RE M ANDE D .

1 4 - 1 5 8 0 3 3
Appeal Reinstated; Order filed February 13, 2018 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00982-CV

____________

CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND CHENIERE LNG TERMINALS, LLC, 

Appellants

V.

PARALLAX ENTERPRISES LLC, PARALLAX ENERGY LLC, 

PARALLAX ENTERPRISES (NOLA) LLC, LIVE OAK LNG LLC, 

LIVE OAK LNG PIPELINE LLC, MOSS LAKE LNG LLC AND 

CALCASIEU LNG LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-49685

ORDER

On January 18, 2018, this court issued an order abating the appeal and 

ordering the parties to conduct mediation within 60 days of the court’s order. 
On January 25, 2018, appellants filed an objection to the abatement of the 

appeal, but not to the court’s order on mediation.

The objection is sustained, and the appeal is reinstated. The parties’ mediation 

report is due on or before March 19, 2018. The reporter’s record is due on or before 

February 23, 2018.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


         I, Edward T. Whelan,  Chief Executive Officer of Military Resale Group,
Inc. (the "Registrant"),  do hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge,  based upon a review of the  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly  period ended September 30, 2003 of the Registrant,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.



                                        By: /s/ Edward T. Whelan
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Name: Edward T. Whelan
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer

November 25, 2003

-------------------------

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Military Resale Group,  Inc. and will be retained by Military Resale
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending August 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  269,687
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,179,402
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,449,089
<PP&E>                                      19,610,833
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,193,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,380,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,563,514
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,496,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,380,406
<SALES>                                     13,669,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,669,706
<CGS>                                       11,222,169
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,833,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (144,209)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,321,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                658,295
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            658,295
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   658,295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
EX-35 (d)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 26, 2007

Ace Securities Corporation
AMACAR GROUP
6525 Morrison Boulevard, Suite 318
Charlotte, NC 28211

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan
Trust, Series 2006-SL1

Per Section 4.15 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 1/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:


(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such Servicer's performance under this Agreement has
     been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement in all material
     respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there has been a
     failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifying
     each such failure known to such officer and the nature and status thereof.



Certified By:
/s/ Scott Strack
Scott Strack, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary