alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Registrant



|                             |  |                              
|---------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary           |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Verigy (Canada) Inc.         |  | Canada                       
|Verigy Germany GmbH          |  | Germany                      
|Verigy Italia S.r.L.         |  | Italy                        
|Verigy (Japan) K.K.          |  | Japan                        
|Verigy (Korea) Ltd.          |  | South Korea                  
|Verigy France SAS            |  | France                       
|Verigy (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.  |  | Malaysia                     
|Verigy (Netherlands) B.V.    |  | The Netherlands              
|Verigy (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. |  | Singapore                    
|Verigy US, Inc.              |  | Delaware                     
|Verigy (US) Development Inc. |  | Delaware                     
|Verigy (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.   |  | Peoples Republic of China   
|Verigy (Israel) Ltd.         |  | Israel                       
|Touchdown Technologies, Inc. |  | California
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-683 (Fourth Review)]


Fresh Garlic From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic 
from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 
1675(c)), instituted this review on April 3, 2017 (82 FR 16223) and 
determined on July 7, 2017 that it would conduct an expedited review 
(82 FR 37237, August 9, 2017).
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this review on October 19, 2017. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4735 (October 2017), 
entitled Fresh Garlic from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-683 (Fourth 
Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 19, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-23040 Filed 10-23-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### Annabelle Valenti et al., Appellants, v 400 Carlls Path Realty Corp., Respondent.

[861 NYS2d 357]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rebolini, J.), dated April 23, 2007, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The injured plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell over a hazardous condition in a parking lot owned by the defendant. An out-of-possession owner or lessor is not liable for injuries that occur on the premises unless the owner or lessor has retained control over the premises or is contractually obligated to repair unsafe conditions *(see Lindquist v C & C Landscape Contrs., Inc.,*38 AD3d 616 [2007]). Here, the defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it was an out-of-possession landlord which had no duty to maintain or repair the parking lot *(see Yadegar v International Food Mkt.,*37 AD3d 595 [2007]; *Seney v Kee Assoc.,*15 AD3d 383 [2005]; *Berado v City of Mount Vernon,*262 AD2d 513*697[1999]). Although the defendant retained the right to enter the premises to make repairs, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant violated a specific statutory provision *(see O’Connell v L.B. Realty Co.,*50 AD3d 752 [2008]; *Ahmad v City of New York,*298 AD2d 473, 474 [2002]; *Kilimnik v Mirage Rest.,*223 AD2d 530 [1996]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Prudenti, P.J., Miller, Garni and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GeoMet, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Darby Seré, Chief Executive Officer, and I, William C. Rankin,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                         
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|/S/    J. DARBY
SERÉ    |  |  |  | /S/    WILLIAM C.
RANKIN
|J. Darby Seré           |  |  |  | William C. Rankin       
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer 
|April 6, 2011           |  |  |  | April 6, 2011           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3143 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3143

 To amend the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000, to 
        extend the authorization of appropriations for that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2009

 Mr. Rehberg introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000, to 
        extend the authorization of appropriations for that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORT PECK RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM, MONTANA.

    Section 9 of the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 
2000 (Public Law 106-382; 114 Stat 1457), is amended by striking, 
``over a period of 10 fiscal years'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``through fiscal year 2015''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32





Section
1350 Certification





In
connection with the quarterly report of China Direct, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Yuejian (James) Wang, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Yi (Jenny) Liu, Vice President -
Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











November
      13, 2008
                    /s/
      Yuejian (James) WangYuejian
      (James) Wang, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerNovember
      13, 2008
                    /s/
      Yi (Jenny) LiuYi
      (Jenny) Liu, Vice President -
Finance




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Christopher W. FRANCIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jane STANDIFIRD, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 11-6012.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 27, 2011.

Christopher W. Francis, Hominy, OK, pro se.

*730Theodore M. Peeper, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before LUCERO, EBEL, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

NEIL M. GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.

Christopher Francis pleaded guilty to child neglect in 2005 and is currently serving his sentence in an Oklahoma state penitentiary. In 2010, Mr. Francis filed a petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court dismissed Mr. Francis’s petition after determining it was untimely, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), and that none of the potential grounds for statutory or equitable tolling of the limitations period could save the petition. Seeking to appeal that dismissal, Mr. Francis asked the district court for a certificate of appealability (“COA”), which the court denied. Now before this court, Mr. Francis renews his request for a COA.

We may issue a COA only if the petitioner makes a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). And where, as here, the district court dismisses a § 2254 petition on procedural grounds, we may issue a COA only if “jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack *v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000). We conclude, however, that no reasonable jurist would debate the district court’s holding that Mr. Francis’s petition is time-barred, and for substantially the same reasons given by the district court. Accordingly, we deny Mr. Francis’s application for a COA and dismiss this appeal. We also deny his motion for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and his “Motion to Consider Designation of Record.”

*

 This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
EXHIBIT
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Carol K.
Nelson, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Lars H. Johnson, Chief
Financial Officer of Cascade Financial Corporation (the "Corporation"), each
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
      Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the
      "Form 10-K"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the
      Corporation.





This
certification is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is not
being filed as part of this report.








Date:
March 13, 2008








/s/ Carol K. Nelson


Carol K.
Nelson, President and Chief Executive Officer








/s/ Lars H. Johnson


Lars H.
Johnson, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.02



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royster-Clark, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul M. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    PAUL M. MURPHYPaul M. Murphy Chief Financial Officer








May 13, 2003
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3064 

For the relief of Benita Veliz-Castillo. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2009 

Mr. GONZALEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Benita Veliz-Castillo. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR BENITA 

4 VELIZ-CASTILLO. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Benita Veliz-Castillo shall be eligible for issuance of 

8 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of 

9 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 

10 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa 

11 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status 

12 to lawful permanent resident. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3064 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Benita Veliz2 Castillo enters the United States before the filing deadline 

3 specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have 

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi5 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Benita Veliz-Castillo, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3064 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Benita Veliz-Castillo shall 

2 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

3 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### Anthony Cardone, Jr., Appellant, v Villa Margherita, Inc., Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 15]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated October 23, 1996, which denied his motion to dismiss certain affirmative defenses.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss certain affirmative defenses. These defenses would be barred by Workers’ Compensation Law § 11 if the plaintiff were an employee of the defendant. The defendant has submitted sufficient proof to raise a material question of fact with respect to the exact nature of the plaintiff’s employment relationship *258with the defendant to defeat the plaintiffs motion *(see, Carrion v Orbit Messenger,*192 AD2d 366, 367-368, *affd*82 NY2d 742). Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 202 (Friday, October 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22727]

[[Page 48833]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Advancing Translational 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; NTU NIH-Industry Program.
    Date: November 13, 2017.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, Room 
1066, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Barbara J. Nelson, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing 
Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Democracy Blvd., Democracy 1, Room 1080, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874, 
301-435-0806, [email protected].

    Name of Committee: National Center for Advancing Translational 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Platform Delivery Technologies for 
Nucleic Acid Therapeutics.
    Date: November 15-16, 2017.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, Room 
1078, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Rahat (Rani) Khan, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing 
Translational Sciences, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Rm 1078, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-894-7319, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, 
Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, 
B--Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research 
Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

     Dated: October 16, 2017.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-22727 Filed 10-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
| Exhibit 31.1 |
|--------------|

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Rodolfo J. Dominguez, certify that:

 
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Viva International, Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.        The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)       Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.        The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
| Dated: August 16, 2006 | By: */s/ Rodolfo J. Dominguez* |
|------------------------|--------------------------------|

Rodolfo J. Dominguezt, Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)