alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


         CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Transition Auto Finance III
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kenneth C. Lowe, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 28, 2005                /s/ Kenneth C. Lowe
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Kenneth C. Lowe
                                     Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
connection with this Quarterly Report of River Hawk Aviation, Inc.  (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Michael G. Brinkley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008008, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of River Hawk Aviation,
Inc.
  Date: November
14, 2008
  By: /s/
      Michael G. BrinkleyMichael
      G. BrinkleyChief
      Financial OfficerPrincipal
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Levine, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of eLandia International Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended
December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Elandia, Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                            
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: May 19, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ David L. Levine        
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | David L. Levine            
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Principal Executive Officer
#### Kathleen Gushue, Appellant, v Estate of Norman Levy, Deceased, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[986 NYS2d 478]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J), entered September 28, 2012, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff claims that she developed Parkinson’s disease due to exposure to manganese fumes. However, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact to rebut defendants’ prima facie showing that there is no general causation *(see Cornell v 360 W. 51st St. Realty, LLC,*22 NY3d 762 [2014]). The scientific evidence indicates that manganese exposure can indeed cause a related but distinct disorder called manganese-induced Parkinsonism, or manganism, but it does not show that manganese exposure can lead to the specific injury claimed, Parkinson’s disease.

Concur—Saxe, J.E, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Matthew Scott SOOS, Debtor. Kelley L. Skehen, Trustee, Appellant, v. Matthew Scott Soos, Appellee. United States of America, Amicus Curiae.

No. 10-2007.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 27, 2011.

James A. Askew, Jocelyn C. Drennan, Esq., Edward Ricco, Rodey Dickason Sloan Akin & Robb, P.A., Albuquerque, NM, Kelley L. Skehen, Office of the Chapter 13 Trustee, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant.

*729William F. Davis, Esq., William F. Davis & Assoc., P.C., Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee.

Ramona D. Elliott, P. Matthew Sutko Executive Office for U.S. Trustees Office of General Counsel, Catherine Bentley Sevcenko, Esq., Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Richard A. Wieland, Trustee, Office of the United States Trustee, Wichita, KS, for Amicus Curiae.

Before HOLLOWAY, ANDERSON, and TACHA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, the Chapter 13 Trustee challenges a final Confirmation Order in a Chapter 13 Plan entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Mexico. The Amended Order Confirming First Amended Chapter 13 Plan was entered on June 15, 2009, and incorporates by reference the reasoning set forth in the Order on Confirmation of Debtor’s Chapter 13 Plan entered on May 6, 2009. The Trustee appealed to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP), raising an issue of first impression in this Circuit. The BAP then certified the bankruptcy order as appropriate for direct appeal to this court, *see*28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2)(A)(i) and (ii), because it involved a question of law as to which there was no controlling decision of this court or the Supreme Court, and because it raised a question of law requiring resolution of conflicting decisions. We granted the Trustee permission to appeal. We later

abated the appeal pending a decision from the Supreme Court in a case raising the very same issue raised in this appeal.

In January, the Supreme Court decided *Ransom v. FIA Card Servs., NA.,*— U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 716, 178 L.Ed.2d 603 (2011), holding that “[a] debtor who does not make loan or lease payments may not take the car-ownership deduction” in the “means test” formula under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. 131 S.Ct. at 721. In light of the holding in *Ransom*and its direct applicability in this appeal, the bankruptcy court’s Amended Order Confirming First Amended Chapter 13 Plan (and the earlier confirmation order incorporated by reference) is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision.

*

 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dacarrus Vanchell STATON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-5093.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 30, 2011.

Decided: April 5, 2011.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. George E.B. Holding, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dacarrus Staton appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to twenty-four months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Staton contends that the sentence is plainly unreasonable. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

A district court has broad discretion to impose a sentence upon revoking a defendant’s supervised release. *United States v. Thompson,*595 F.3d 544, 547 (4th Cir.2010). We will affirm unless the sentence is “plainly unreasonable” in light of the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006) factors. *United States v. Crudup,*461 F.3d 433, 437 (4th Cir.2006).

In reviewing the sentence imposed by the district court, we first assess whether the sentence is unreasonable, “following] generally the procedural and substantive considerations that we employ in our review of original sentences.” *Id.*at 438. A sentence is proeedurally reasonable if the district court has considered the policy statements contained in chapter seven of the *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*(“USSG”) and the applicable § 3553(a) factors and has explained adequately the sentence chosen. *Id.*at 439. A court need not, however, explain a revocation sentence in as much detail as is required upon imposition of the original sentence. *Id.*A sentence is substantively reasonable if the district court states a proper basis for its imposition of a sentence up to the statutory maximum. *Id.*at 440. If, after considering the above, we determine that the sentence is not unreasonable, we will affirm. *Id.*at 439.

We hold that the district court’s imposition of a twenty-four month term of imprisonment was not unreasonable. Pro-eedurally, the district court adequately explained its chosen sentence and considered the § 3553(a) factors and USSG chapter seven policy statements. Substantively, the district court stated a proper basis and sentenced Staton within the statutory maximum. *See*18 U.S.C. § 924(a) (2006). Because we conclude that Staton’s sentence was not unreasonable, we need not consider whether it was plainly so.

*271Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Indalex Holdings Finance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Timothy R.J. Stubbs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Date:
March 31, 2008

|By:    |  | /s/TIMOTHY R.J. STUBBS  |  | 
|------ |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Name:  |  | Timothy R.J. Stubbs     |  | 
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in
typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Indalex Holdings Finance, Inc. and will be retained by Indalex Holdings
Finance, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    The National Science Board's Committee on External Engagement (EE), pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the                           ( print page 48854)                        Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:                

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, October 25, 2017 at 2:30-3:30 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE:

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. An audio link will be available for the public. Members of the public must contact the Board Office to request the public audio link by sending an email to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*                         at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference.                    

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Discussion to identify committee members to lead various initiatives; preferred methods for sharing information about recent or upcoming events; and review and discussion of draft charge for the Committee on External Engagement.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Nadine Lymn (                        *nlymn@nsf.gov*), 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.                    

                        Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​.jsp#sunshine.*

                        Please refer to the National Science Board Web site at                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for general information.                    

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2017-22849 Filed 10-17-17; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Community Bankshares, Inc.(the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,  Harry L.
Stephens, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 By:
    /s/ Harry L. StephensHarry
      L. StephensChief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      March 29, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          62,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,379,798
<PP&E>                                         470,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                (72,027)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,974,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          763,267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    24,193,826
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,128,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,974,522
<SALES>                                         46,447
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,477
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,664,591
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,936
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,622,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,622,080)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,622,080)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)




</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3484 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3484

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority for 
     certain qualifying work-study activities for purposes of the 
 educational assistance programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2009

   Ms. Herseth Sandlin (for herself and Mr. Boozman) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority for 
     certain qualifying work-study activities for purposes of the 
 educational assistance programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR CERTAIN QUALIFYING WORK-STUDY 
              ACTIVITIES FOR PURPOSES OF THE EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 
              PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 3485(a)(4) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``June 10, 2010'' each place it appears and inserting ``June 
30, 2014''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.18


    Exhibit
      10.18

    
 

    THIRD
      AMENDMENT TO THE NORTEK, INC.

    SUPPLEMENTAL
      EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN B

    


    


    WHEREAS,
      Nortek, Inc. (the "Company") adopted the Nortek, Inc. Supplemental Executive
      Retirement Plan B (the "Plan") effective January 1, 1998; and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Plan provides that the Board may, from time to time, amend said Plan
      provided that such amendment does not reduce the accrued benefit of any
      participant.

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended and revised effective as of January 1,
      2005 to comply with the requirement of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
      Code
      of 1986, as follows:

     

    
      	1.  	
              Section
                2.9 is hereby amended to read:

            


    

     

            “2.9  “Disabled”
means
      that the
      Participant is (i) unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by
      reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can
      be
      expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period
      of not less than 12 months, or (ii) is, by reason of determinable physical
      or
      mental impairment which can be expected to last for a period of not less than
      12
      months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than
      3
      months under an accident and health plan of the Company. 

     

    
      	2.  	
              Section
                5.2 is hereby amended to read:

            


    

     

          "5.2  Early
      Commencement of Benefits.
      A
      vested Participant who ceases to be an Employee before Normal Retirement Age
      because of retirement may thereafter elect to have his retirement benefit under
      the Plan commence any time after the attainment of age 55 (but not later than
      the Participant's Normal Retirement Date). If a Participant elects to have
      his
      retirement benefit commence before his Normal Retirement Date, the retirement
      benefit payable to him will be reduced using the factors set forth in Schedule
      B. The reduction factors shall be applied to the net benefit that would be
      payable at Normal Retirement Date after the offset provided for in 5.1(a)(i)
      above, and then the reduced benefit shall be further reduced for the offset
      provided for in 5.1(a)(ii)."

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Third Amendment to be executed
      this
      31st day of October, 2006.

     

    NORTEK,
      INC.

    


    


    By:
      /s/Edward J.
      Cooney
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert H. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


April 20, 2005                         /s/ Robert H. Nelson
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Robert H. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered
filed as part of the Report.