alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of eUniverse, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the SEC on or
about the date hereof (the Report), Brett C. Brewer, as President and Principle Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas J. Flahie, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |                                                                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 10, 2004 |  | /s/ Brett C. Brewer                                                    
|                        |  | Brett C. Brewer                                                        
|                        |  | President and Principal Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)







|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: February 10, 2004 |  | /s/ Thomas J. Flahie         
|                        |  | Thomas J. Flahie             
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                        |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
[No. 41497-0-II.

Division Two.

October 3, 2012.]

#### Arthur West, *Appellant,*v. Dick Marzano et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 09-2-01357-5, Paula Casey and Anne Hirsch, JJ., entered February 4, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Worswick, C. J.,

concurred in by Hunt and Quinn-Brintnall, JJ.
Exhibit 31.3

Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to

Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Ezra Uzi Yemin, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Delek US Holdings, Inc.; and

2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



By:

/s/ Ezra Uzi YeminEzra Uzi Yemin,President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: June 26, 2014
Exhibit 99.1


April 17, 2000



Board of Directors
BrowseSafe.com, Inc.

7202 87th Street, Suite 109
Indianapolis, IN 46256

Dear Board Members:

As of this date April 17, 2000,  please accept my  resignation  as a Director of
the Board and Vice  President of  BrowseSafe.com.  I'm sorry to say I don't have
the time necessary to carry out my duties as a board member or Vice President of
the Company and therefore I have to step down at this time.

Thank you for your understanding.

Sincerely,


/s/ J. Marshall Gage, Director
J. Marshall Gage, Director

jmg/g
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Professional Lease Management Income Fund
I, L.L.C., (the “Fund”), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Manager and of
the Fund, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the
Report of the Fund filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
 
 
 
 
 /s/
Richard K Brock
 Richard K
Brock
 Chief
Financial Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 (Principal
Financial Officer)
 March 29,
2005
**Exhibit 10.21**
**AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

    This Amendment dated this 8th day of March, 2004, covers the    Employment Agreement dated November 1, 2002 between    Edelbrock Corporation, a Delaware corporation    (“Edelbrock”) and Aristedes Feles    (“Employee”).

Section 3.     Term and Termination
 3.1     Employee’s term of employment shall be amended to cover the    period October 31, 2005 through June 30, 2009.
All other provisions of the November 1, 2002 Agreementshall remain unchanged and be in full force and effect.
    EMPLOYEE      /s/ Aristedes Feles
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 202 (Friday, October 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48842-48843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22738]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4338-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Georgia; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4338-DR), dated September 15, 2017, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 11, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and

[[Page 48843]]

Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of September 15, 2017.

    Echols, Effingham, Lowndes, and Tift Counties for Public 
Assistance [Categories C-G] (already designated for debris removal 
and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], including 
direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.


Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-22738 Filed 10-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 11
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
 
                                                             Year ended May 31,
                                                 -----------------------------------------
                                                     1997           1996          1995 
                                                 ------------   ------------  ------------
<S>                                              <C>            <C>           <C>
Total weighted average shares outstanding......     6,347,416     5,790,522     3,686,704

Loss before extraordinary item.................  $ (9,030,000)  $(4,820,000)  $(1,437,000)
Extraordinary item, net of income tax benefit..  $ (3,389,000)  $        --   $        --
                                                 ------------   -----------   -----------
Net loss.......................................  $(12,419,000)  $(4,820,000)  $(1,437,000)
Preferred stock dividends......................  $ (2,470,000)  $(1,837,000)  $        --
                                                 ------------   -----------   -----------
 
Loss applicable to common stock................  $(14,889,000)  $(6,657,000)  $(1,437,000)
                                                 ============   ===========   ===========
 
Loss per share:
 Loss before extraordinary item................  $      (1.81)  $    ( 1.15)  $     (0.39)
 Extraordinary item............................  $      (0.53)  $        --   $        --
                                                 ------------   -----------   -----------
 Net loss......................................  $      (2.34)  $    ( 1.15)  $     (0.39)
                                                 ============   ===========   ===========
 
</TABLE>
Notes to computation of loss per share:

(1)  Common stock equivalent shares issued one year prior to the offering and
assumed issued and outstanding for all periods presented under SAB 83 guidance
for fiscal years prior to the IPO.  Prior to the IPO, the offering price of
$4.00 is used in the computation of the average market price.  Dilution is
determined using the average market price.   The common equivalent shares for
fiscal year 1996 and 1995 have an anti-dilutive effect on the loss per share and
have therefore been excluded from the calculation of loss per share.
#### Hifig KILZI-MARDIK, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72280.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 14, 2011.

Edgardo Quintanilla, Quintanilla Law Firm, Inc., Sherman Oaks, CA, for Petitioner.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Nehal Kamani, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hifig Kilzi-Mardik, a native of Lebanon and citizen of Venezuela, petitions for re*691view of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, *Cerezo v. Mukasey,*512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir.2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing statutes and regulations, *Simeonov v. Ashcroft,*371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir.2004). We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,*542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

We reject Kilzi-Mardik’s contention that he suffered harm on account of his ethnicity and membership in a particular social group. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that he failed to demonstrate a nexus between past or feared future harm and a protected ground. *See Gormley v. Ashcroft,*364 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.2004) (petitioner presented no evidence he was victimized on account of his race as opposed to the perpetrators’ “observation that he carried a cell phone and a watch”); *Li v. INS,*92 F.3d 985, 987 (9th Cir.1996) (individuals with “low economic status” are not a particular social group). Accordingly, KilziMardik’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Ochoa v. Gonzales,*406 F.3d 1166, 1172 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Felix CORDERO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. H.A. RIOS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 09-17011.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed: March 15, 2011.

Felix Cordero, pro se.

Bureau of Prisons Regional Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Stockton, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Jesse Gonzalez, USPA — U.S. Penitentiary, Atwater, CA, Mark J. Mckeon, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Federal prisoner Felix Cordero appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Cordero contends that the Bureau of Prisons erred by declining to give him credit toward his federal sentence for the time he served in state custody before he was convicted and sentenced in federal court. The district court properly denied the petition because Cordero is not entitled to credit for time served for a separate state offense. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3585(b); *see also Taylor v. Reno,*164 F.3d 440, 444-45 (9th Cir.1998); *Thomas v. Brewer,*923 F.2d 1361, 1366-67 (9th Cir.1991).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Imagis  Technologies  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report),  I, Wayne
Smith,  Vice  President  Finance  and Chief  Operating  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                 /s/ Wayne Smith
                                 ---------------
                                 Wayne Smith
                                 Vice President Finance, Chief Operating Officer
                                 (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
                                 August 14, 2003



<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Imagis  Technologies  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report),  I, Roy
Trivett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                  /s/ Roy Trivett
                                  ---------------
                                  Roy Trivett
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  (Principal Executive Officer)
                                  August 14, 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0606 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER I TOULOUSE ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 2 , 20 2 1 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 26 2021

04/26/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0606
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ruben Fernandez, Appellant.

[987 NYS2d 181]

Application by *819the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 3, 2010 *(.People v Fernandez,*78 AD3d 726 [2010]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 1, 2008.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Eng, EJ., Mastro, Rivera and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

TERRY ANTONIO CARTER, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D22-982

LT Case No. 2021-CF-00239

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 21, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Flagler County, 

Terence R. Perkins, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, 

and Jane Almy, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.
2

Appellant, Terry Antonio Carter, was charged with one count of battery 

and one count of false imprisonment. After his motion for judgment of 

acquittal was denied, the jury returned guilty verdicts as to both counts. The 

trial court adjudicated him guilty on both counts and imposed legal 

sentences. However, when it imposed $809 in costs in the order regarding 

community control, the trial court failed to include statutory citations for each 

cost, despite the legal requirement to do so. See V.D. v. State, 922 So. 2d 

1037, 1038 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (citing Miller v. State, 912 So. 2d 1282 (Fla.

2d DCA 2005)). 

Accordingly, having considered the Anders brief and finding only the 

error regarding costs, we affirm the judgment and sentence, but remand for 

entry of an amended order of community control to include appropriate 

statutory citations for the authority to impose each item of cost. 

AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR ENTRY OF AMENDED ORDER.

LAMBERT, C.J., EDWARDS and JAY, JJ., concur.
cafn_Ex10-3


		
			Exhibit 10.3
		

		
			 
		

		
			Amendment to Term Note
		

		
			 
		

		
			Effective Date:  December 16, 2014
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, Cachet Financial Solutions Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Company” or “Borrower”), and The Margaret De Jonge Trust (“Lender”) (collectively “Parties”) entered into a Term Note for $613,808, effective December 14, 2012 (the "Agreement"); and
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the payment terms as set forth in the Agreement to require Borrower to make four $50,000 payments beginning December 31, 2014 and extend the Maturity Date of the Agreement to April 30th, 2015.
		

		
			 
		

		
			NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			Capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			The second paragraph of the Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety asset forth below.




		
			 
		

		
			Borrower will pay this loan according to below payment schedule with all outstanding principal plus all accrued, unpaid interest becoming due on April 30th, 2015 (the “Maturity Date”), subject to any prepayment.
		

		
			Payment Schedule
		

			
	
			
				 -
			

			
	
			
			$50,000 due on December 31, 2014; 




			
	
			
				 -
			

			
	
			
			$50,000 due on January 31, 2015; 




			
	
			
				 -
			

			
	
			
			$50,000 due on February 28th, 2015; 




			
	
			
				 -
			

			
	
			
			$50,000 due on March 31, 2015;




			
	
			
				 -
			

			
	
			
			The remaining balance of accrued, unpaid interest and principal due on April 30th, 2015




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 3.
			

			
	
			
			All terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except to the extent specifically modified herein.




		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representative as of the Effective Date written above.
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Lender:

					
					
						 

					
					
						Cachet Financial Solutions Inc.

				
	
					
						By:  

					
					
						/s/ Margaret De Jonge

					
					
						 

					
					
						By:  

					
					
						/s/ Jeffrey C. Mack

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Margaret De Jonge

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						Jeffrey C. Mack

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Lender

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						Chief Executive Officer