alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James C. Mastandrea, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
President of Paragon Real Estate Equity and Investment Trust, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Paragon Real Estate
Equity and Investment Trust (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of
trustees (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 24, 2004By:
    
    
    
    /s/ James C. MastandreaJames C. MastandreaChairman of the Board, ChiefExecutive Officer and President(Chief Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of PVF Capital Corp. (the Registrant) hereby certify that this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Robert J. King, Jr.Name:

Robert J. King, Jr.Title:

President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ James H. NicholsonName:

James H. NicholsonTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: September 16, 2011
#### Pedro JESUS-GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-72977.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 24, 2011.

Ricardo Vidal, Law Offices of Ricardo Vidal, P.A., San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.

Ann M. Welhaf, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Pedro Jesus-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that Jesus-Gonzalez is ineligible for withholding of removal under the “persecutor’s bar” of 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(B)(i) because Jesus-Gonzalez failed to exhaust this issue before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**DEGOLYERAND MACNAUGHTON**

5001SPRING VALLEY ROAD

SUITE 800 EAST

DALLAS, TEXAS 75244 

**CONSENT of INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**

We hereby consent to the references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton, to theincorporation of information contained in our “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2002 on Certain Properties Owned by Geomet, Inc.,” “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2003 on Certain Properties Owned by Geomet,Inc.,” “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2004 on Certain Properties Owned by Geomet, Inc.,” “Appraisal Report on Proved Reserves as of December 31, 2005 on Certain Properties Owned by Geomet, Inc.,” and“Appraisal Report on Proved Reserves as of December 31, 2006 on Certain Properties owned by Geomet, Inc.” (our Reports), and to references to our Reports in “Part I, Item 2, Properties,” “Part II, Item 6,Selected Financial Data,” “Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and “Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in theAnnual Report on Form 10–K of Geomet, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON 

DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON 

Dallas, Texas 

March 19, 2007
CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, John E. Rea, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of INVVISION CAPITAL,
INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

May 24, 2004

/s/ John E. Rea
---------------
John E. Rea
Principal Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 313 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 313

To amend title 11, United States Code, to establish a priority for the 
  payment of claims for duties paid to the United States by licensed 
          customs brokers and sureties on behalf of a debtor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2009

 Mr. Cuellar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 11, United States Code, to establish a priority for the 
  payment of claims for duties paid to the United States by licensed 
          customs brokers and sureties on behalf of a debtor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Customs Business Fairness Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 507(a) of title 11, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(11) Eleventh, allowed unsecured claims of customs 
        brokers (as defined in section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930) 
        and sureties (as provided in section 623 of the Tariff Act of 
        1930) for duties, taxes, or other charges paid to the United 
        States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection on behalf of the 
        debtor arising out of the importation of merchandise entered 
        for consumption within one year before the date of the filing 
        of the petition.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendment made by this Act shall take effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by this Act shall 
apply only with respect to cases commenced under title 11, United 
States Code, on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED  MARCH 31,  2000,  FOR DIGS,  INC.  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                    1,658,473
<SECURITIES>                                140,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               122,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,972,828
<PP&E>                                      214,884
<DEPRECIATION>                               60,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            2,306,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        39,479
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                      25
<COMMON>                                      6,659
<OTHER-SE>                                2,267,105
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              2,306,584
<SALES>                                     214,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            214,280
<CGS>                                        71,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               437,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            3,801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                    800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (129,903)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00


</TABLE>
#### Luz Vargas, Appellant, v Tufaro Bus Company, Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 437]

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated July 12,1996, which denied her motion to strike the defendant’s third affirmative defense and granted the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered October 28, 1996, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see, Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see,*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Based on the evidence demonstrating that the defendant exercised control and supervision over the plaintiff, the *367Supreme Court properly concluded that the plaintiff was a special employee of the defendant as a matter of law, and that the instant action therefore is barred by the plaintiff’s recovery of Workers’ Compensation benefits *(see, Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp.,*78 NY2d 553, 558; *Olsen v We’ll Manage,*214 AD2d 715; *Cameli v Pace Univ.,*131 AD2d 419, 420). Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

JOHN GAILAN YATES-BAILEY, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D16-2789 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed June 30, 2017. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Lisa D. Campbell, 

Judge. 

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

 In this Anders1 appeal, we find no error in Mr. Yates-Bailey's judgment or 

sentence; however, we remand to the circuit court to correct a scrivener's error in the 

order of revocation. The order states: "Found in Violation: Revoke probation and 

 

 1Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 
- 2 - 

sentence the offender to 15 years['] Prison on [Count] 1 and 5 years['] Prison on [Count] 

2." Although the remaining record is clear on this point, the order of revocation fails to 

correctly recite that Yates-Bailey was found to have violated condition five of his 

probation—failing to live without violating any law. Accordingly, the order or revocation 

of probation is remanded for the circuit court to correct the scrivener's error to reflect the 

violation of condition five. 

 Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener's error. 

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
#### JOANNE MANZO *v.*CONNECTICUT GASTROENTEROLOGY CONSULTANTS, P.C., ET AL.

(AC 32061)

Bear, Espinosa and Mihalakos, Js.

Argued December 5

officially released December 20, 2011

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22488]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 10172]


Notice of Public Meeting

SUMMARY: As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 
92-463, the Department of State gives notice of a meeting of the 
Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services. This 
Committee will meet on Wednesday, November 1, 2017, from 1:00 p.m. to 
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time in the American Institute of Architects Board 
Room at 1735 New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20006.
    Any member of the public interested in providing input to the 
meeting should contact Ms. Shereece Robinson, whose contact information 
is listed below (see the ``for further information'' section of this 
notice). Each individual providing oral input is requested to limit his 
or her comments to five minutes. Requests to be added to the speakers 
list must be received in writing (letter or email) prior to the close 
of business on Wednesday, October 25, 2017; written comments from 
members of the public for distribution at this meeting must reach Ms. 
Robinson by letter or email on this same date. A member of the public 
requesting reasonable accommodation should also make his/her request to 
Ms. Robinson by October 25. Requests received after that date will be 
considered but might not be able to be fulfilled.
    The agenda of the meeting will include Universal Postal Union 
Postal Operations Council and Council of Administration fall session 
outcomes and implementation of the Integrated Product Plan to modernize 
and integrate the UPU's international mail product categories and 
associated remuneration systems.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Please contact Ms. Shereece Robinson 
of the Office of Specialized and Technical Agencies (IO/STA), Bureau of 
International Organization Affairs, U.S. Department of State, at tel. 
(202) 663-2649, by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dc8eb3beb5b2afb3b28f9dee9cafa8bda8b9f2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="de8cb1bcb7b0adb1b08d9fec9eadaabfaabbf0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>, or by mail at IO/
STA, Suite L-409 SA-1; U.S. Department of State; Washington, DC 20522.

Joseph P. Murphy,
Designated Federal Officer, Advisory Committee on International Postal 
and Delivery Services, Office of Specialized and Technical Agencies, 
Bureau of International Organization Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-22488 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30,
2004 of Edelbrock Corporation (the Company) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Aristedes T. Feles,
Vice- President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or § 78o(d));
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. September 28, 2004
    /s/ARISTEDES T. FELESAristedes T. FelesVice-President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Urban Well Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Zunilda Perez, Plaintiff-Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Erie Insurance Company of New York, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Paul A. Goetz, J.), entered March 12, 2015, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Paul A. Goetz, J.), entered March 12, 2015, reversed, with $10 costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. (<i>See Urban Well Acupuncture, P.C. v Erie Insurance Company of New York</i>, appeal numbered 16-214, decided herewith.) The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: September 19, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Report of CoConnect, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brad M. Bingham, Esq., Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Brad M. Bingham, Esq. Brad M. Bingham, Esq. Interim Chief Executive Officer  August 22, 2011