alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CHARLES D. GIANETTI *v.*JOSEPH LUCIAN GERARDI

(AC 33066)

Lavine, Beach and Espinosa, Js.

Argued January 20

officially released February 28, 2012

*859
      *Charles D. Gianetti,*pro se, for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Joseph L. Gerardi,*pro se, for the appellee (defendant).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

The self-represented plaintiff, Charles D. Gianetti, a physician, appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the self-represented defendant, Joseph Lucian Gerardi, an attorney licensed to practice in Connecticut. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court abused its discretion by overruling his objection to the report of an attorney trial referee (referee) and rendering judgment in favor of the defendant on the basis of the report. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant sounding in breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment and quantum meruit. Pursuant to Practice Book § 19-2A, the action was referred to a referee. Following a hearing, the referee issued a report. See Practice Book § 19-8. The referee found that the plaintiff provided medical and surgical treatment to a child who had sustained severe dog bite injuries. The plaintiff submitted a bill, which was found to be reasonable and customary, to the child’s mother and to the insurance carrier of the dog’s owner. The plaintiff did not submit his bill to the defendant, who represented the child’s interests in an action against the dog’s owner. The plaintiff was never paid for the services he rendered to the child.

The referee also found that “[t]he defendant requested medical records and bill from the plaintiff.

*860. . . The plaintiff indicated to the defendant, individually and through counsel, that he would only supply the bill and medical information if he received a letter of protection from the defendant. . . . The defendant indicated to [the] plaintiff that if [the] plaintiff sent his bill, he would submit it to the insurance company and provide a letter of protection for any reasonable bill to the extent that it was not paid by said insurance carrier. . . . There was never a meeting of the minds between [the] plaintiff and [the] defendant on the issues of payment or the supplying of medical information and a bill.” The referee recommended that judgment enter in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff objected to the report. In a memorandum of decision, the court overruled the plaintiffs objection and rendered judgment in favor of the defendant.

Our examination of the record, briefs and arguments of the parties persuades us that the judgment of the court should be affirmed. The court’s memorandum of decision is thorough and well reasoned; we adopt it as a proper statement of the facts and the applicable law on the issues raised. See *Gianetti*v. Gerardi, 52 Conn. Sup. 207, 44 A.3d 911 (2010). No useful purpose would be served by repeating the discussion contained therein. *See Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Ins. Co.*v. *Wysocki,*243 Conn. 239, 241, 702 A.2d 638 (1997).

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3281 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3281

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out demonstration 
    projects related to providing care for veterans in rural areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2009

Mr. Rodriguez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out demonstration 
    projects related to providing care for veterans in rural areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON ALTERNATIVES FOR EXPANDING CARE 
              FOR VETERANS IN RURAL AREAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, through the 
Director of the Office of Rural Health, shall carry out demonstration 
projects to examine the feasibility and advisability of alternatives 
for expanding care for veterans in rural areas, including the 
following:
            (1) Establishing a partnership between the Department of 
        Veterans Affairs and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid 
        Services of the Department of Health and Human Services to 
        coordinate care for veterans in rural areas at critical access 
        hospitals (as designated or certified under section 1820 of the 
        Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i-4)).
            (2) Establishing a partnership between the Department of 
        Veterans Affairs and the Department of Health and Human 
        Services to coordinate care for veterans in rural areas at 
        community health centers.
            (3) Expanding coordination between the Department of 
        Veterans Affairs and the Indian Health Service to expand care 
        for Indian veterans.
    (b) Geographic Distribution.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
shall ensure that the demonstration projects carried out under 
subsection (a) are located at facilities that are geographically 
distributed throughout the United States.
    (c) Report.--Not later than two years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit a 
report on the results of the demonstration projects conducted under 
subsection (a) to--
            (1) the Committee on Veterans' Affairs and the Committee on 
        Appropriations of the Senate; and
            (2) the Committee on Veterans' Affairs and the Committee on 
        Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated $350,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 through 2011 to 
carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Lynch  Interactive
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter period ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
Robert E. Dolan, as Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                           /s/ Robert E. Dolan
                                               ---------------
                                               Name: Robert E. Dolan
                                               Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: August __, 2004



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, our financial condition and result of                  operations. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                           | DISPATCH                  AUTO PARTS INC.(Registrant) |
|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |                                                  |   |
| Date: September                  27, 2007 | By:                                         | /s/ Liu,                  Sheng Li |
|                                           | Liu,                  Sheng LiPresident               |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor)

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Draft Advisory Opinion 2017-11: Gallegly for Congress

Campaign Guide for Corporations and Labor Organizations

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Freedom's Defense Fund (FDF) (A13-14)

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Conservative Majority Fund (CMF) (A13-17)

Management and Administrative Matters

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Dayna C. Brown, Secretary and Clerk, at (202)  694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

Dayna C. Brown,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2017-23085 Filed 10-19-17; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Agile Software Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Bryan D. Stolle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|                       |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: December 8, 2004 |  | /s/ Bryan D. Stolle                    
|                       |  | Bryan D. Stolle Chief Executive Officer
MIPSolutions,
        Inc.

    

    Molecular
      Solutions for the Treatment of Water

    1117
      Desert Lane, Suite 1592

    Las
      Vegas, NV 89102

    


    VIA
      FACIMILE

    


    January
      29, 2007, 2006

    


    Daniel
      D.
      Weiss

    Sr.
      Contracts Administrator 

    The
      Johns
      Hopkins University

    Applied
      Physics Laboratory

    11100
      Johns Hopkins Road

    Laurel,
      MD 20723-6099

    


    Re;
      Task Order #AD-2925L Amendment No. 4

    


    Dear
      Daniel,

    


    This
      letter shall serve as confirmation that MIP Solutions, Inc. hereby accepts
      and
      issues Amendment No. 4 (a four and a half month extension of time to complete
      the project) pursuant to The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
      (“JMU/APL”) Task Order #AD-29251. This Task Order was issued pursuant to BOA No,
      123-001.

    


    Under
      this Amendment No. 4, both JHU/APL and the Company hereby agree that the stated
      term of this Agreement, pursuant to Section 8.2, shall be extended from 6 months
      to 16.5 months. The parties’ initial Task order #AD-29251 began on February 15,
      2006 (or thereabouts) and as a result of this amendment, shall now end no later
      than June 30, 2007. All other terms and conditions of Task Order & AD-29251
      shall remain in full effect and force.

    


    Please
      confirm your acceptance of the above by affixing your signature below and faxing
      back to me.

    
      	 	 	 	 
	Sincerely,	 	 	 
		 	 	
            
	
              

              Edward
                A. Hunton

              Corporate
                Secretary, Director, and Treasurer

              MIPSolutions,
                Inc.

            	 	 	
            
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
            	 	 	
              

            
	 	 	 	
              1/30/07
[No. 65847-6-I.

Division One.

October 8, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Terr Ellis MacMillan, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Skagit County, No. 10-1-00382-6, John M. Meyer, J., entered August 4, 2010. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per

Spearman, A.C.J.,

concurred in by Becker and Appelwick, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Carmen A. Martinez, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 859]

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 2, 1996, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive additional unemployment insurance benefits pursuant to Labor Law § 599 (2).

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive additional unemployment insurance benefits upon enrolling in an approved educational training course pursuant to Labor Law § 599 (2) because the funding for that program had been exhausted. Inasmuch as substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, we must affirm. While it is undisputed that on February 3, 1995, the local unemployment office approved claimant’s participation in an educational training program from January 31, 1995 through June 2, 1995, claimant was also advised that such approval was not a guarantee of additional benefits and was conditioned upon the availability of funds under the Labor Law § 599 program after her regular unemployment benefits had expired. The funds available for that program are limited to $20,000,000 per program year which, in this case, ran from July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995 *(see,*Labor Law § 599 [2] [b]). The record establishes that the $20,000,000 was committed to other participants in the program by December 31, 1994. The coordinator of the Labor Law § 599 program testified that, in the exercise of the Commissioner of Labor’s authority to establish a priority system for the payment of committed funds *(see,*12 NYCRR 482.6 [b]), a cut-off date of December 31, 1994 was set; this meant that those claimants who were approved for educational training after December 31, 1994 were put on a *934waiting list and had priority to receive additional benefits prospectively if additional funds became available and the individual was still attending the same approved training program (see, 12 NYCRR 482.6 [d]). Claimant, who was approved for training after the cut-off date, was placed on the wait list but no new funds became available before the completion of her training or, in fact, before the end of the program year on June 30, 1995.* In view of the foregoing, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s ruling that, although claimant’s training qualified her for benefits under Labor Law § 599, she was ineligible to receive benefits due to the lack of funds available during the entire period of her training from January 31, 1995 through June 2, 1995.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

*

 In fact, the Labor Law § 599 program shut down entirely on March 31, 1995 for lack of funds.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment"), dated as of
October 15, 1999, between bamboo.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly
known as Jutvision Corporation) (the "Company"), and Randy Bresee, ("Employee"),
amends the Letter Agreement, dated as of April 1, 1999, between bamboo.com and
Employee (the "Agreement").

     IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

     1.   Base Salary.  Effective October 1, 1999, the Base Salary set forth in
          -----------
Section 3 of the Agreement is increased to an annual rate of $210,000.

     2.   Miscellaneous.  Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement is,
          -------------
and shall remain, in full force and effect and each and every term and condition
thereof is hereby confirmed, continued and ratified. All terms defined in the
Agreement, except as otherwise defined herein, shall have the same meanings
where used herein. This Amendment may not be altered, amended or modified in any
way except by a writing signed by both parties. This Amendment may be executed
by exchange of signature pages by facsimile and/or in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be an original as against the party whose
signature appears thereon and all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day
and year first above written.

BAMBOO.COM, INC.                             RANDY BRESEE

By: /s/ Leonard B. McCurdy                   /s/ Randall I. Bresee
   -----------------------                   ---------------------
Name: Leonard B. McCurdy
     ---------------------
Title: Chairman and CEO
      --------------------
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John J. McGovern, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Poseidis, Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures; and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting that occurred during the  registrant's  fiscal
quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which adversely  affect
the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,  summarize and report  financial
information; and
     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  October 3, 2006
                                              /s/ John J. McGovern
                                              -------------------------------
                                              John J. McGovern
                                              Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer