alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Poseidis,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Louis  Pardo dit
Pardau,  Chief  Executive  Officer (or equivalent  thereof) and Chief  Financial
Officer (or equivalent thereof) of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.





By:/s/ Louis Pardau Dit Pardo
-------------------------------------------------
Louis Pardau Dit Pardo
Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
July 19, 2004
#### Latonya K. Johnson, Respondent, v Suffolk County Police Department et al., Appellants.

[665 NYS2d 440]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for false arrest and battery, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Newmark, J.), dated July 26, 1996, which granted the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the jury verdict in favor of the defendants on her cause of action to recover damages for battery and directed the entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiff on that cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff brought the instant action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for false arrest and battery. At trial, she was awarded a judgment as a matter of law on her cause of action to recover damages for false arrest. After the jury returned a verdict in *341favor of the defendants on her cause of action to recover damages for battery, the plaintiff moved pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a), *inter alia,*to set aside the jury verdict and for the entry of judgment in her favor on that cause of action as a matter of law. Her motion was granted and the defendants appeal.

The court correctly determined that the plaintiff was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on her cause of action to recover damages for battery. Even when the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the defendants, there is no rational process by which the jury could have found for them *(see, Mirand v City of New York,*84 NY2d 44, 48-49; *Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493, 499; *O’Brien v Covert,*187 AD2d 419, 420; *Dolitsky v Bay Isle Oil Co.,*111 AD2d 366). “To recover damages for battery founded on bodily contact, a plaintiff must prove that there was bodily contact, that the contact was offensive, and that the defendant intended to make the contact without the plaintiffs consent” *(Roe v Barad,*230 AD2d 839, 840; *see, Villanueva v Comparetto,*180 AD2d 627; *Laurie Marie M. v Jeffrey T. M.,*159 AD2d 52, *affd*77 NY2d 981). As the arrest of the plaintiff by the defendant police officer Stephen E. Brussell was unlawful, Brussell committed a battery when he touched the plaintiff during that arrest *(see, Budgar v State of New York,*98 Misc 2d 588, 592).

The defendants’ claim that the plaintiffs motion should have been denied as untimely *(see,*CPLR 4405) is without merit, as the plaintiff established “good cause” for her three-day delay in making the motion (CPLR 2004; *see, Pioli v Morgan Guar. Trust Co.,*199 AD2d 144, 148; *cf., Casey v Slattery,*213 AD2d 890, 891). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 6/30/00 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,426
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,187
<PP&E>                                           1,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,812
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              110
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,159
<SALES>                                         14,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,723
<CGS>                                            8,558
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,580)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,580)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,580)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.79)


</TABLE>
#### CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A. *v.*RICHARD M. FARINA

(AC 32670)

Gruendel, Lavine and Espinosa, Js.

*358Argued January 10

officially released January 31, 2012

*RichardM. Farina,*pro se, the appellant (defendant).

*Julie B. Solomon,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

In this action to collect *on*an unpaid credit card debt of approximately $15,000, the self-represented defendant, Richard M. Farina, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to open and to vacate the judgment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On May 12, 2009, the plaintiff, Citibank (South Dakota) N.A., filed its complaint. On October 21, 2009, the court granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. The defendant timely filed an appeal in this court, which affirmed the judgment of the trial court. *Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.*v. *Farina,*122 Conn. App. 901, 995 A.2d 649, cert. denied, 299 Conn. 901, 10 A.3d 519 (2010).

*359Less than two months after this court’s decision was issued, the defendant filed a motion to open and to vacate the judgment. On September 2, 2010, the trial court denied the defendant’s motion and sustained the plaintiffs objection to it. In its articulation of its ruling, the trial court made a finding that the issues raised by the defendant in his motion were frivolous.

Although the issues framed in the defendant’s statement of issues are, on their face, cogent, his analysis of them is not. Like the trial court, we conclude that the issues raised by the defendant are frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K  of Home  Equity  Loan  Trust  2006-HSA2  (the  "Exchange  Act  periodic
   reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

   In giving the  certifications  above, I have reasonably relied on information
   provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  parties:  JPMorgan Chase Bank,
   N.A. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.

Date:  March 26, 2007

By:     /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ----------------------
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title:    Managing Director
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos MORENO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-50898

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Grayson Kirk Meade, Esq., Meade Law Office, Alpine, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Carlos Moreno, Texarkana, TX, pro se.

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Moreno has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Moreno has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 29, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00870-CR No. 05-15-00871-CR No. 05-15-00872-CR
ARTIS GRANVILLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F96-43459-R, F96-19274-R, F97-45891-R



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Bridges Artis Granville filed pro se notices of appeal on July 20, 2015 referencing convictions
from 1996 and 1997. Appellant’s notices of appeal do not state any new app ealable orders have

been entered in these cases. The July 20, 2015 notices of appeal are untimely as to the 1996 and
1997 sentencing dates. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2(a)(1) (notice of appeal due within thirty days of
date sentence imposed or suspended in open c ourt). We dismiss the appeals for want of
jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47 150570F.U05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

ARTIS GRANVILLE, Appellant

No. 05-15-00870-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F96-43459-R. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, Justices Lang and Schenck participating.

Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered July 29, 2015.–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

ARTIS GRANVILLE, Appellant

No. 05-15-00871-CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F96-19274-R. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, Justices Lang and Schenck participating.
Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered July 29, 2015.–4– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

ARTIS GRANVILLE, Appellant

No. 05-15-00872-CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F97-45891-R. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, Justices Lang and Schenck participating.
Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered July 29, 2015.
Exhibit 4.66







FILE NOTE



Employee – Geoffrey Guy



Date - 13/04/17



Base Pay Increase/Bonus and Removal of Allowances



Base Pay increase to £451,684 per annum with effect from
1/1/17.



Annual Bonus of £355,603 for 2016 paid with February 2017's
pay.



GW Pension Contributions and Car Allowance
have been aggregated in to 2017 base pay.



|/s/
    Philippa Crompton      | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Philippa Crompton, HR Director | 
|                               | 
|Date - 13/04/17                | 



GW Pharmaceuticals plc Sovereign House Histon
Cambridge United Kingdom

Telephone: +44 (0)1223 266800 Facsimile: +44
(0)1223 235667 www.gwpharm.com

Company No. 4160917
Registered in England and Wales
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,265
<SECURITIES>                                    16,012
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                       307
<INVENTORY>                                     11,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,915
<PP&E>                                          40,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,341
<SALES>                                         76,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,870
<CGS>                                           44,950
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,567<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    61<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,460
<INCOME-TAX>                                       723
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,737
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,737
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.22
<FN>
<F1>Research & Development expenses
<F2>Provision for Bad Debt
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Steve M. Hanni, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report of Emergency Filtration
Products, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: October 24, 2003

/s/Steve M. Hanni
Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.1


Cascade Corporation

Executive Incentive Plan

FY 2008


Overview


Key
plan objectives include maximizing adjusted IBT (adjusted for executive
incentive and environmental expense) and building shareholder value.  We believe that the measure that has the
greatest impact on shareholder value is fundamentally income.  As a result, this plan focuses on this
measure with a modifier for individual contribution.


Key
Plan Features


·                       Awards based on actual
performance, not budget


·                       Threshold or minimum performance at 75% level
required before Plan pays any award


·                       Individual performance (or “how” results are
achieved) will modify the final award


·                       Upside opportunity for extraordinary
performance


·                       Board discretion to adjust if
economic/business conditions warrant (up to 30% of base salary maximum)


·                       Acquisitions or divestitures having a material impact on plan metrics
will be incorporated using pro-forma business plan data.


Award
Opportunity


Each
position is eligible to receive a percentage of Adjusted Income Before Taxes
(IBT) above $50 million to a maximum dollar award amount as indicated.  The Board may adjust the minimum level to
reflect Board and management-determined business goals and strategies.  In addition, the Board would have the
discretion to allocate additional award dollars in the event of exceptional
circumstances.


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Target

  	
   

  	
  Maximum

  	
   

  
	
  Position

  	
   

  	
  $50M - <$60M

  	
   

  	
  $60M - <$80M

  	
   

  	
  $80M + >

  	
   

  	
  ($70M)

  	
   

  	
  ($88M)

  	
   

  
	
  CEO

  	
   

  	
  .340

  	
  %

  	
  .535

  	
  %

  	
  .852

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  375,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  750,000

  	
   

  
	
  COO

  	
   

  	
  .171

  	
  %

  	
  .269

  	
  %

  	
  .428

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  188,500

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  377,000

  	
   

  
	
  CFO

  	
   

  	
  .171

  	
  %

  	
  .269

  	
  %

  	
  .428

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  188,500

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  377,000

  	
   

  
	
  SVP-HR

  	
   

  	
  .100

  	
  %

  	
  .157

  	
  %

  	
  .250

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  110,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  220,000

  	
   

  
	
  VP-Fin.

  	
   

  	
  .100

  	
  %

  	
  .157

  	
  %

  	
  .250

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  110,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  220,000

  	
   

  



 


Individual
Modifier:


	
  Outstanding achievement:

  	
   

  	
  1.2 times

  
	
  Target
  achievement:

  	
   

  	
  1.0 times

  
	
  Below target
  achievement:

  	
   

  	
  0.8 times

  



 


Example:


	
  Position:

  	
   

  	
  CFO

  
	
  Adjusted IBT:

  	
   

  	
  $70.0 million

  
	
  Incentive %

  	
   

  	
  .269%

  
	
  Individual
  Performance:

  	
   

  	
  Target

  
	
  Award
  calculation:

  	
   

  	
  $70.0 million x .269% x 1.0 = $188.300