alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3364 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 

South San Diego County Water Reclamation Project, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2009 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the South San Diego County Water Reclamation Project, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘South San Diego 

5 County Water Reclamation Project of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

8 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102– 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3364 IH

1 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by 

2 adding after the last section the following: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 16ll. THE SOUTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER REC4 LAMATION PROJECT, CALIFORNIA. 

5 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera6 tion with the Sweetwater Authority, Otay Water District 

7 and the City of Chula Vista, California, may participate 

8 in the design, planning, and construction of permanent fa9 cilities needed to reclaim, reuse, and treat groundwater 

10 and wastewater in South San Diego County, California. 

11 ‘‘(b) COSTSHARING.—The Federal share of the cost 

12 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

13 25 percent of the total cost of the project. 

14 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary 

15 shall not be used for the operation and maintenance of 

16 the project described in subsection (a). 

17 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

18 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

19 $25,000,000.’’. 

20 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec21 tions in section 2 of Public Law 102–575 is amended by 

22 adding after the last item the following: 

‘‘Sec. 16ll. The South San Diego County Water Reclamation Project, California.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance
Sheet at September 30, 1998 and the Statement of Income for the Year Ended
September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              38
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,690
<ALLOWANCES>                                       461
<INVENTORY>                                     16,127      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,293   
<PP&E>                                          10,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,707 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,819
<BONDS>                                         15,768
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,644
<SALES>                                        294,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               294,281
<CGS>                                          262,633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  262,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,901
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,543
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,358
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,358
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93
        

</TABLE>
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.,


c/o
      Global Commercial Real Estate


4
      World
      Financial Center, 16 th Floor


250
      Vesey
      Street, New York, New York 10080





Re:
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of March 1, 2006
      among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor, Wachovia Bank,
      National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, Inc., as
      Special Servicer, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating
      to
      ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
      Series 2006-1.





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
EX-10.1



 





Exhibit 10.1




Description of the Material Terms of the Company’s

2007 Management Bonus Program 




     Under the Company’s 2007 Management Bonus Program (the “Program”), each of the Company’s
executive officers (William H. Largent, Eric W. Langille and Julia A. Fratianne) has the
opportunity to earn cash bonuses based upon the achievement of certain quarterly and annual revenue
and adjusted operating income targets. The sum of the four quarterly targets and the sum of the
four quarterly potential payouts equal the annual target and the annual potential payout,
respectively. If quarterly targets are met, the Company will pay out one-half of the bonus
potential for such quarter upon certification of the quarterly results by the Compensation
Committee. If annual targets are met, the Company will pay out the corresponding annual bonus less
any actual quarterly bonus payments that have been made during the year. In the aggregate, the
executive officers have the potential to receive bonuses between 5% and 80% of their base salary
under the Program in accordance with the chart below:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Payout as a Percentage of Base Salary
	 	 	Threshold	 	Target	 	Maximum
	William H. Largent
	 	6.25%   	 	50%	 	80%
	Eric W. Langille
	 	5%   	 	40%	 	64%
	Julia A. Fratianne
	 	5%   	 	40%	 	64%






     For purposes of the Program, adjusted operating income is defined as operating income
exclusive of stock option and restricted stock expenses. No quarterly or annual bonus is payable
unless the participant is continuously employed by the Company through the end of the quarter or
year, as applicable. The Program shall terminate upon a change in control of the Company, and no
bonuses shall be earned or paid under the Program with respect to the quarter in which such change
in control occurs and thereafter, and any bonus earned and accrued, but unpaid in the quarter or
quarters prior to the change in control, due to the fact that such unpaid amounts were to be
subject to annual adjustment, shall be paid out to the Program participants as soon as practicable
following the date of such change in control.
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Todd
M. Raba, Senior Vice President of MidAmerican Energy Company (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the
best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
      December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.Dated:
      February 28, 2005/s/
      Todd M. RabaTodd
      M. RabaPresident(chief
      executive officer)
Fifth Amendment to the Dynegy Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan


 Exhibit 10.23 
 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
 DYNEGY INC. 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Dynegy Inc. (the “Company”), has established and maintains the Dynegy Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”) for the
benefit of its eligible employees and the eligible employees of certain participating companies; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend
the Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Plan shall be, and hereby is amended as follows, effective as of January 1, 2005:

 I. 
 Section 1.1(32) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows: 
  

	 	“(32)	Employer: The Company and each other entity that has been designated to participate in the Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article XVIII.”


 II. 
 The
following provision is hereby added to the end of Section 3.9(c) of the Plan to provide as follows: 
 “Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if an Eligible Employee’s interest under a qualified plan described in Section 401(a) of the Code is distributed in connection with an acquisition of stock or assets by an Employer or a Controlled Entity, the Eligible
Employee’s entire outstanding loan under such plan may be contributed as a Rollover Contribution to this Plan, in accordance with this Section 3.9, provided that the transferor plan provides the Committee with a current favorable IRS
determination letter issued to such transferor plan and trust or such other evidence that the Committee in its discretion deems satisfactory to establish that the proposed Rollover Contribution is in fact eligible for rollover to the Plan and is
made pursuant to and in accordance with applicable provisions of the Code and Treasury regulations. The Committee shall determine, in its discretion, whether or not a distribution is made in connection with an acquisition of stock or assets by an
Employer or a Controlled Entity.” 






 III. 
 Except as modified herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Fifth Amendment to the Plan to be executed this 28th day of January, 2005, effective as hereinbefore provided. 
  

			
	DYNEGY INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Illegible
	Title:	 	BPC - Chairman
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Richard Delefonta ROGERS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30216

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

Josette Louise Cassiere, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Alexander Coker Van Hook, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Alex James Washington, Jr., Attorney, Washington & Wells, L.L.C., Shreveport, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Richard Delefonta Rogers has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rogers has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cik. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Automatic Annual Additions



 Exhibit 10.13.2 
 Automatic Annual Additions 
 Microsemi Corporation 1987 Stock Plan, as amended 
 2005, 2006 & 2007 
 The number of shares of Microsemi
Stock available for awards under the Microsemi Corporation 1987 Stock Plan, as amended (the “1987 Plan”) has increased incrementally pursuant to the 1987 Plan’s terms at the beginning of each of the Company’s respective fiscal
years listed below: 
  

			
	 Fiscal Year
	  	Increase (in shares)
	 2005
	  	2,393,184
	 2006
	  	2,540,148
	 2007
	  	2,870,087
<Page>


      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of eUniverse, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Brad D. Greenspan, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Joseph L. Varraveto, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
'SS' 1350, as adopted pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Brad D. Greenspan                          Date:  August 14, 2002
-----------------------
Brad D. Greenspan
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Joseph L. Varraveto                        Date:  August 14, 2002
-----------------------
Joseph L. Varraveto
Chief Financial Officer




This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49549-49550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22815]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-134247-16]
RIN 1545-BN73


Revision of Regulations Under Chapter 3 Regarding Withholding of 
Tax on Certain U.S. Source Income Paid to Foreign Persons; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a correction to a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (REG-134247-16) that was published in the Federal Register 
on Friday, September 15, 2017. The notice of proposed rulemaking, 
published on January 6, 2017, under section 1441 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (Code), relates to withholding of tax on certain 
U.S. source income paid to foreign persons and requirements for certain 
claims for refund or credit of income tax made by foreign persons.

DATES: The correction published on September 15, 2017 (82 FR 43314), is 
corrected as of October 26, 2017 and is applicable beginning January 6, 
2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kamela Nelan at (202) 317- 6942 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-134247-16) that is the 
subject of this correction is under section 1441 of the Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-134247-16) 
contains an error which may prove to be misleading and needs to be 
corrected.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the notice of proposed rulemaking published at 82 FR 
43314, September 15, 2017, is corrected as follows:
    On page 43314, in the third column, under the heading ``Correction 
of Publication'', in the fourth line, the

[[Page 49550]]

language ``On page 1636, '' is corrected to read ``On page 1646, ''.

Martin V. Franks,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2017-22815 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3059 

To amend title 35, United States Code, to create an exception from infringement of design patents for certain component parts used to repair another article of manufacture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2009 

Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California (for herself, Mr. BOUCHER, Ms. JACKSONLEE of Texas, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. COHEN, and Mr. WILSON of Ohio) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 35, United States Code, to create an exception from infringement of design patents for certain component parts used to repair another article of manufacture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Access to Repair Parts 

5 Act’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3059 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION FROM INFRINGEMENT FOR CERTAIN 

2 COMPONENT PARTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 271 of title 35, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(j) It shall not be an act of infringement of any de7 sign patent to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the 

8 United States or import into the United States any article 

9 of manufacture that itself constitutes a component part 

10 of another article of manufacture, if the sole purpose of 

11 the component part is for the repair of the article of man12 ufacture of which it is a part so as to restore its original 

13 appearance.’’. 

14 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub15 section (a) applies to acts done on or after the date of 

16 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
#### Larry Ray SWEARINGEN, Petitioner-Appellant v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 09-70036.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 7, 2011.

James Gregory Rytting, Philip Harlan Hilder, Hilder & Associates, P.C., Houston, TX, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Thomas Merrill Jones, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Larry Ray Swearingen was scheduled for execution on January 27, *4142009. He sought permission to file a successive petition for writ of habeas corpus, which this court granted in part the day before his execution. *In re Swearingen,*556 F.3d 344 (5th Cir.2009). On remand, however, the district court concluded that Swearingen failed to satisfy the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(B)® and (ii). *Swearingen v. Thaler,*No. H-09-300, 2009 WL 4433221 (S.D.Tex. Nov. 18, 2009). He appeals that decision.

A successive habeas petition is appropriate where:

> (i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence; and

> (ii) the facts underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the applicant guilty of the underlying offense.

28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(B). Swearingen contends that he learned for the first time in 2008 of tissue samples that exonerate him of the murder of Melissa Trotter. He further contends that he could not have discovered the existence of the samples prior to 2008 and that his attorneys provided constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to uncover and employ this evidence. As the district court explained, however, these arguments are unavailing. The evidence existed at the time of trial, 2009 WL 4433221 at *16-17, and even if it were not discoverable through due diligence, it does not constitute “clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found [Swearingen] guilty of the underlying offense.” *See Johnson v. Dretke,*442 F.3d 901, 911 (5th Cir.2006) (explaining the high threshold for § 2244(b)(2)(B)(ii) innocence showing). Likewise, we affirm the district court’s conclusion that Swearingen has not demonstrated ineffective assistance of counsel. Swearingen’s trial counsel developed a reasonable strategy, including expert testimony regarding the time of Trotter’s death. *See Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

We AFFIRM the dismissal of Swearin-gen’s successive habeas corpus petition.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 11:15 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on October 26, 2017.

# PLACE:

999 E Street NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.

* * * * *

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2017-22862 Filed 10-17-17; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P