alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3435 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3435

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
Making supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2009 for the Consumer 
                 Assistance to Recycle and Save Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,  That the following 
sums are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for 
other purposes, namely:

                      DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

             National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

            consumer assistance to recycle and save program

                          (transfer of funds)

    For an additional amount for ``Consumer Assistance to Recycle and 
Save Program'' to carry out the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save 
Program established by the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act 
of 2009 (title XIII of Public Law 111-32), not to exceed 
$2,000,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2010: Provided, 
That such amount shall be available for such purpose only to the extent 
directed by the President, and shall be derived by transfer from the 
amount made available for ``Department of Energy--Energy Programs--
Title 17--Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program'' in title IV of 
division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 
(Public Law 111-5): Provided further, That the amount under this 
heading is designated as an emergency requirement and necessary to meet 
emergency needs pursuant to sections 403 and 423(b) of S. Con. Res. 13 
(111th Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal 
year 2010.
     Section 1302(g) of Public Law 111-32 is amended by inserting the 
following new paragraph:
        ``(3) Review of administration of the program by government 
    accountability office and inspector general.--Not later than 180 
    days after the termination date described in subsection (c)(1)(A), 
    the Government Accountability Office and the Inspector General of 
    the Department of Transportation shall submit reports to the 
    Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives 
    and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the 
    Senate reviewing the administration of the program.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MEHMET TUGCU

, Appellant,

v.

TOD MARTIN

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 560

[ October 19, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE14

- 002632

.

Mehmet Tugcu, Plantation, pro se.

Richard H. Gaines of The Gaines Law Firm, P.A., Coral Springs, for

appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., M AY and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Warren F. Kruger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


May 17, 2007                           /s/ Warren F. Kruger
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Warren F. Kruger, Chief Executive Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered
filed as part of the Report.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21479]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, November 29, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gretchen Swayzer at 1-888-912-1227 or 
469-801-0769.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Wednesday, November 29, 2017, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time 
via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. For more information 
please contact: Gretchen Swayzer at 1-888-912-1227 or 469-801-0769, TAP 
Office, 4050 Alpha Rd, Farmers Branch, TX 75244, or contact us at the 
Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various committee issues for submission to 
the IRS and other TAP related topics. Public input is welcomed.

    Dated: October 1, 2017.
Susan Jimerson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2017-21479 Filed 10-4-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Georgia Malone & Company, Inc., Respondent, v Extell Development Company et al., Appellants.

[987 NYS2d 167]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered January 16, 2014, in favor of plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs entitlement to a broker’s commission is established by the real estate contract, which acknowledges plaintiffs performance of services and expressly promises that plaintiff will be paid by the sellers in the subject transaction (Helmsley-Spear.; *Inc. v New York Blood Ctr.,*257 AD2d 64, 67 [1st Dept 1999]). However, the contract does not specify the amount of the commission, and there is no separate brokerage agreement. Thus, plaintiff is entitled to a commission that is “fair and reasonable,” i.e. “the customary rate in the community at the time when the services are rendered” *(Kaplon-Belo Assoc. v Cheng,*258 AD2d 622, 622 [2d Dept 1999]). Plaintiffs expert opined, based on the specific transaction at issue, that plaintiff is entitled to a *2%*commission. Defendants’ vice president’s affirmation, which states that brokerage commissions such as this are generally arrived at by negotiation, is conclusory, has no basis in the record, and fails to address plaintiff’s expert’s claims. We reject defendants’ challenge, made for the first time on appeal, to plaintiffs expert’s credentials *(see Guzman v 4030 Bronx Blvd. Assoc. L.L.C.,*54 AD3d 42, 49 [1st Dept 2008]), as well as their contention that the motion court should not have considered the affidavit because plaintiff failed to disclose the expert *(see Downes v American Monument Co.,*283 AD2d 256 [1st Dept 2001]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Tom, J.E, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of RAM Holdings Ltd. (the Company) for the year
ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), Vernon M. Endo, as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                   |                                         | 
|------------------ | --------------------------------------- | 
|/S/ Vernon M. Endo |                                        
|                   |                                        
|Name:              | Vernon M. Endo                          | 
|Title:             | President and Chief
  Executive Officer | 
|Date:              | March 17, 2008                          | 

96

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 340 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 340

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
 feasibility of designating Camp Security, located in Springettsbury, 
   York County, Pennsylvania, as a unit of the National Park System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2009

  Mr. Platts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
 feasibility of designating Camp Security, located in Springettsbury, 
   York County, Pennsylvania, as a unit of the National Park System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Camp Security National Historic Site 
Study Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) Camp Security is believed to be the only undisturbed 
        prisoner-of-war camp from the Revolutionary War remaining in 
        the United States.
            (2) Built at the direction of the Continental Congress, 
        Camp Security housed over 1,000 British prisoners of war 
        between 1781 and 1783.
            (3) The vast majority of British soldiers imprisoned at 
        Camp Security were captured as a result of the Continental 
        Army's pivotal victories at the Battles of Saratoga and 
        Yorktown.
            (4) Large portions of Camp Security were built along a 
        steep hill using terraces, a unique architectural and earthwork 
        feature.
            (5) Upon the 1783 adoption of the Treaty of Paris, Camp 
        Security was closed and those prisoners who did not marry local 
        women and settle in the area returned to their families in 
        Great Britain.
            (6) Recent excavations and surveys of the site identified 
        intact archeological deposits and recovered numerous domestic 
        and military artifacts.

SEC. 3. STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior shall submit to the 
Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a study of the 
suitability and feasibility of designating Camp Security, located in 
Springettsbury Township, York County, Pennsylvania, as a unit of the 
National Park System.
    (b) Process.--Section 8(c) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)) 
shall apply to the conduct of the study required by this section, 
except that the study shall be submitted pursuant to subsection (a) not 
later than 18 months after the date on which funds are first made 
available for the study.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
                               ------------

                               CERTIFICATION
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the
"Report") of AMCON Distributing Company (the "Company") for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2006, I, Christopher H. Atayan, Chief Executive Officer
and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

    (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
       of the Company.


Date: May 23, 2007           /s/ Christopher H. Atayan
                             ------------------------------
                             Title: Chief Executive Officer
                              and Vice Chairman



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to AMCON Distributing Company and will be retained by AMCON
Distributing Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Todd Michael AYALA, a.k.a. Michael Lane, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-50383.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 15, 2011.

Sean Kevin Lokey, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Riverside, CA, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.

Todd Michael Ayala, Phoenix, AZ, pro se.

James H. Locklin, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Todd Michael Ayala appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 48-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a *730firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ayala’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Attention: Christopher A. Prine,

Court of Appeals/ First District

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas77002_2066

i.",MiM wm.'wrH;77::v.-'::;T~'

FIRSTCCl..;~: ^~ appeals

H0US10M.TTXAS

MAY 212015 Pay 18' 2°15

CLERK

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-04-01071-CR Trial Court Case

Number: 21,928, David James v. The Stac*?.

Dear Christopher A. Prine, Clerk:

Sometime between 5-7-2015 and 5-13-2015 the inmate Trust Fund

issued a withdrawal check for $4.24 (four dollars and tewnty four

cents to be mailed to you for the requested records, 7 pages of

Supplemental Clerk's Record. Due to the delay in this procedure,

I had a Family Member send a money order from Post Office, serial

number: 22344760495 on May 4, 2015. I have not received requested

records and am now requesting to check your records and please

forward the requested records, either by sending two copies or

one copy and refund the additional $4.24 back to my Inmate Trust

Fund Account. I would appreciate immediate resolution of this and

the provision of the needed records so I can proceed into the court

as soon as I recieve the records. Thank you.

Submitted,

1251548

3001 South Emily Drive

Beeville, Texas781Q2
K (ft #• A G y*

£2 UJ £. u

Q

<r

&

€# *-

T f-& *K O 'M

0}>

*1<H <\l

If) **

o

rH (3

H

•m CO

, rsj '>h i*"» ' rH -* 0

4J >rt .11

*=he

X

3 rt3 iJ

«3 fH

cu .c S r-{ U

-

(OH3 CD

l-3 (!)O ~H

G CO

H

3 C • H H 0 <~\ !> > O O "J d 0 o ?J

OSMn

•JU 3J

•H SS h H

.•JU

•Si 3* •Ha • < UO

*j i-O

0)^

o

U0 cn

-H JS

i

&i ii cN o o * *j .'J o

•a !Ji 'J [*» 4 -H 1) r^

id >j

u 35

1>C

u fd

%o

Ax

li -j 4 ,. a ;-t

•H

*MO

c

-

0 *Hc

C

jj .-o

0

{J2 r^ -U

*4y '0

3 '•»

H

3

o ;jo

0

o< ro S3

</>>mu

CMOo

r-
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22614]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary


Senior Executive Service; Appointment of Members to the 
Performance Review Board

    Title 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4) provides that Notice of the Appointment 
of the individual to serve as a member of the Performance Review Board 
of the Senior Executive Service shall be published in the Federal 
Register.
    The following individuals are hereby appointed to serve on the 
Department's Performance Review Board:

Permanent Membership

Chair--Deputy Secretary
Vice-Chair--Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management
Alternate Vice-Chair--Chief Human Capital Officer--Sydney T. Rose
Executive Secretary--Director, Executive Resources--Lucy Cunningham
Performance Officer--Director, Performance Management Center

Rotating Membership--Appointments Expire on 09/30/20

BLS--Jay A. Mousa, Associate Commissioner for Office of Field 
Operations
ETA--Leo Miller, Regional Administrator, Philadelphia
MSHA--Patricia W. Silvey, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Operations
OASAM--Tonya Manning, Director, Cyber Security and Chief Information 
Security Officer
OCFO--Kevin Brown, Associate Deputy Chief Financial Officer
OFCCP--Marika Litras, Director of Enforcement
OLMS--Stephen J. Willertz, Director, Office of Enforcement and 
International Union Audits
OSHA--Amanda Edens, Director of Technical Support and Emergency 
Management
OSHA--Kenneth Nishiyama-Atha, Safety and Health Administrator, Chicago
OWCP--Vincent Alvarez, Administrative Officer
SOL--Michael D. Felsen, Regional Solicitor, Boston
SOL--Stanley Keen, Regional Solicitor, Atlanta
SOL--Jeffrey L. Nesvet, Associate Solicitor for Employment and Training 
Legal Services
WB--Joan Y. Harrigan-Farrelly, Deputy Director
WHD--Patrice R. Torres, Assistant Administrator for Administrative 
Operations

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lucy Cunningham, Director, Office 
of Executive Resources, Room N2453, U.S. Department of Labor, Frances 
Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20210, 
telephone: (202) 693-6624.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on October 5, 2017.
R. Alexander Acosta,
Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2017-22614 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-04-P
#### In the Matter of Anonymous, Appellant, v Anonymous, Respondent.

[665 NYS2d 590]

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Slobod, J.), dated November 8, 1996, which, *inter alia,*denied his motion to vacate a Stipulation of Custody concerning the parties’ daughter and maintained custody of the child with the mother.

Ordered that the order is modified by (1) deleting the provision thereof directing that the father shall not initiate any conversation with the parties’ child “about any abuse, relative to her” and substituting therefor a provision directing that the father shall not initiate any conversation with the parties’ child about any abuse relative to R. G. (Anonymous), and (2) deleting the provision thereof directing the father not to inquire of the child, or of anyone else in her presence, whether she has been alone in the presence of the mother’s husband; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

The Family Court properly concluded that, based on the totality of the circumstances, it was in the best interest of the child to maintain custody with the mother *(see, Matter of Krebsbach v Gallagher,*181 AD2d 363; *Fox v Fox,*177 AD2d 209).

However, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the Family Court to enjoin the father from (1) initiating any conversation with the child about “any abuse, relative to her”, and (2) “inquiring of the child or of anyone else in her presence, whether she had been alone in the presence” of the mother’s husband *(see, Stephanie L. v Benjamin L.,*158 Misc 2d 665, 667).

The father’s remaining contention is without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.