alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
             PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Lars H. Johnson, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cascade Financial
Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

    a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  March 12, 2004                  /s/ Lars H. Johnson
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Lars H. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Louis Pardo dit Pardau, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on form 10-QSB of Poseidis, Inc.

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "evaluation date"); and
     (c)  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the evaluation date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     (a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     (b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 15, 2003

By:  /s/ Louis Pardo dit Pardau
     ---------------------------------------------
     Louis Pardo dit Pardau
     Chief Financial Officer or equivalent thereof
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James C. Mastandrea, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Paragon
Real Estate Equity and Investment Trust, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Paragon Real Estate Equity and Investment
Trust (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the Registrant and we have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the Registrants board of trustees (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: February 17, 2005 By:
    
    /s/ James C. MastandreaJames C. MastandreaChairman of the Board, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President(Chief Executive Officer)
[No. 68362-4-I.

Division One.

November 5, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Joseph Deforest Carter, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 10-1-01327-1, Elizabeth P. Martin, J., entered October 22, 2010. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Schindler, J.,

concurred in by Leach, C.J., and Lau, J.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 202 / Friday, October 20, 2017 / Presidential Documents 48751 

Proclamation 9661 of October 13, 2017 

National Forest Products Week, 2017 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

During National Forest Products Week, we recognize the invaluable contribution forest products make to our daily lives, the forest products industry’s 

importance to our economy, and the incredible beauty and recreational 

opportunities provided by our Nation’s woodlands. This year, many of our 

forests and surrounding communities face blazing wildfires, so we also 

pray for the safety of our people, our first responders, and our forest habitats. 

Our Nation is blessed with millions of acres of forested lands. These lands 

produce abundant renewable and sustainable natural resources that support 

our economy. They provide 2.4 million jobs, primarily in rural communities 

across America, and produce products that help improve our everyday lives. 

Whether we are writing a note, building a home, or sending a delivery, 

paper and wood products enable us to do our jobs and live comfortable 

lives. 

America’s thriving forest products market helps protect and preserve our 

abundant forests for future generations. Demand for forest products encourages landowners to replant and maintain healthy forests, knowing that 

through proper stewardship and responsible management, our precious forests will continue to contribute to our economic prosperity and quality 

of life. 

During National Forest Products Week, we acknowledge and celebrate the 

many uses of our parks, forests, and woodlands, and we honor the dedicated 

Americans who work to ensure our forests remain productive and magnificent 

for future generations. 

Recognizing the economic value of the products yielded in our Nation’s 

forests, the Congress, by Public Law 86–753 (36 U.S.C. 123), as amended, 

has designated the week beginning on the third Sunday in October of each 

year as ‘‘National Forest Products Week’’ and has authorized and requested 

the President to issue a proclamation in observance of this week. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 15 through 

October 21, 2017, as National Forest Products Week. I call upon all Americans 

to observe this week with appropriate ceremonies and activities and to 

reaffirm our commitment to our Nation’s forests. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with D0
48752 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 202 / Friday, October 20, 2017 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirteenth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seventeen, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and fortysecond. 

[FR Doc. 2017–22936 

Filed 10–19–17; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3295–F8–P 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with D0Trump.EPS</GPH>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amazon Biotech, Inc., a Utah
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Simcha Edell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

      3.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      4.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/S/ SIMCHA EDELL
------------------------
Simcha Edell
Chief Financial Officer
July 3, 2006
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00228-CR

Manuel Fuentes

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

24th District Court of Calhoun County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2014-06-7434

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 13, 2016.
#### Ana Elizabeth VELASCO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-75143.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 15, 2011.

Leticia Torres Moreno, Law Offices of Leticia T. Moreno, APC, Commerce, CA, for Petitioner.

John Beadle Holt, Esquire, Trial, Oil, Blair O’Connor, Assistant Director, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ana Elizabeth Velasco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo due process claims. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Velasco’s motion to reopen for failure to show prejudice. *See id.*at 793-94 (prejudice results when “the performance of counsel was so inadequate that it *may*have affected the outcome of the proceedings.”) (emphasis in original).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Even assuming Corpuz did not consent to the blood draw, we have 

recently held that, while the warrantless, nonconsensual search provided 

for in NRS 484C.160(7) is unconstitutional, the good-faith exception to the 

exclusionary remedy applies when an officer reasonably and in good faith 

relied on the constitution validity of the statute. See Byars v. State,. 

Nev. , P.3d (Adv. Op. No. 85, October 16, 2014). Therefore,, the 

district court did not err by denying Corpuz's motion to suppress. 

Next, Corpuz claims that the district court abused its 

discretion by denying his motion for a new trial based on prosecutorial 

misconduct. We review the denial of a motion for a new trial for an abuse 

of discretion. See Steese u. State, 114 Nev. 479, 490, 960 P.2d 321, 328 

(1998). When considering allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, we first 

determine whether the prosecutor's conduct was improper and then 

whether any improper conduct warrants reversal. See Valdez u. State, 124 

Nev. 1172, 1188, 196 P.3d 465, 476 (2008). Here, the prosecutor argued 

that Corpuz may have wanted to prove his car was faster than another, 

and Corpuz timely objected. After a brief bench conference, during which 

Corpuz claimed that the argument was not supported by evidence and was 

speculation, the district court sustained the objection, and the prosecutor 

immediately moved on. Even assuming that the argument constituted 

prosecutorial misconduct, we conclude that it was harmless error. See 

Truesdell v. State, 129 Nev. , 304 P.3d 396, 402 (2013). Therefore, 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 
the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Corpuz's motion 

for a new trial. 

Having considered Corpuz's claims and concluded that no 

relief is warranted, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Hardesty 

°D1774 j. 

Douglas 

cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge 

Mueller Hinds & Associates 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) I947A
Exhibit 32.1

CLAYMONT STEEL, INC.





CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE
OFFICERS

(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Each of the undersigned, James
E. Declusin, Chief Executive Officer and President of Claymont Steel, Inc. (the Company), and Robin A. Gantt, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 28, 2008



/s/ James E. DeclusinJames E. DeclusinChief Executive Officer and President/s/ Robin A. GanttRobin A. GanttChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48571-48572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22581]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2006-26367]


Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee; Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Department 
of Transportation (DOT).

[[Page 48572]]


ACTION: Announcement of Charter Renewal of the Motor Carrier Safety 
Advisory Committee (MCSAC).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces the charter renewal of the MCSAC, a Federal 
Advisory Committee that provides the Agency with advice and 
recommendations on motor carrier safety programs and motor carrier 
safety regulations through a consensus process. This charter renewal 
took effect on September 29, 2017, and will expire after 2 years.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Shannon L. Watson, Senior Advisor 
to the Associate Administrator for Policy, Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey 
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 385-2395, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85e8e6f6e4e6c5e1eaf1abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e9848a9a888aa98d869dc78e869f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), FMCSA is giving notice of the 
charter renewal for the MCSAC. The MCSAC was established to provide 
FMCSA with advice and recommendations on motor carrier safety programs 
and motor carrier safety regulations.
    The MCSAC is composed of up to 20 voting representatives from 
safety advocacy, safety enforcement, labor, and industry stakeholders 
of motor carrier safety. The diversity of the Committee ensures the 
requisite range of views and expertise necessary to discharge its 
responsibilities. See the MCSAC Web site for details on pending tasks 
at http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/mcsac.

    Issued on: October 12, 2017.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-22581 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T W I LLI A M W I LLI A M S, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. J OH N C. M ARSHALL, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 56417 D. C . No . 2 : 0 6 - c v - 0 4 1 5 9 - C AS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C hr i s t i naA . S ny de r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e bua ry21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C alifo rn ia state p riso n erW il li am W il li am s ap p ea ls fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s or de rde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f irm . 

# FI LED FEB 22 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 56417 2 W i l l i a m s c ont e nds tha tthe G ove rnor ’ s 2004 de c i s i on r e ve r s i ng the B oa r d of P r i s on T e rm s ’ s de c i s i on f i ndi ng hi m s ui t abl e f

orpa r ol e w a s nots upport e d by

“ som e e vi dence” and there fore vi ol at ed hi s due proces s r i gh t s. T he on l y f eder al r ig h t a t is s u e in th e p a r o le c o n te x t is p r o c e du r a l, a n dth e o n lyp r o p e rin q u iryis w h atp ro cess th e i n m at e received , n o tw h eth er th e st at e co u rtd eci d edth e case c o rr e c tly . See Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 1 3 1 S . C t. 8 5 9 , 8 6 2 - 6 3 ( 2 0 1 1 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . Be c au s e W i l l i a ms r a i s e s n o p r o c e du r a l c h a l l e n g e s , w e a f f i rm. AF F I RME D.