alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
     ACT OF 1934 I, Anthony N. Renzi,  certify  that:  1. I have  reviewed  this
     report on Form 10-K and all  reports on Form 10-D  required  to be filed in
     respect of the period  covered by this  report on Form 10-K of RAMP  Series
     2006-NC2 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
     do not contain any untrue  statement of a material  fact or omit to state a
     material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in light of the
     circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading with
     respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based  on my  knowledge,  all  of the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
     information  required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
     by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.   I am responsible  for reviewing the  activities  performed by the servicers
     and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing
     the servicer compliance  statements required in this report under Item 1123
     of  Regulation  AB, and except as  disclosed  in the  Exchange Act periodic
     reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
     agreements in all material respects; and

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing  criteria for
     asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
     of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed  securities required
     to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
     and Exchange  Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been  included as an exhibit
     to this report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
     instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
     provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  parties:  U.S. Bank National
     Association. Date: March 26, 2007

By:  /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
     --------------------
    Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
    Title: Managing Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
TRITEL, INC. AND PREDECESSOR COMPANIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001088383
<NAME>                        TRITEL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1
<CURRENCY>                                   U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                           482,459
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      8,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (230)
<INVENTORY>                                       16,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 515,765
<PP&E>                                           307,411
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (15,196)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,109,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             65,078
<BONDS>                                          564,483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            101,853
<PREFERRED>                                       46,374
<COMMON>                                           1,071
<OTHER-SE>                                       292,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,109,874
<SALES>                                           15,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  15,499
<CGS>                                              9,076
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      9,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 154,946
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     188
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (5,691)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (154,402)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (506)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (153,896)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (153,896)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (1.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (1.32)



</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3181 

To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to permit the establishment 

of Jobs Corps centers in territories of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2009 

Mr. SABLAN (for himself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Ms. BORDALLO, Mrs. 

CHRISTENSEN, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

HARE, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, 

Mr. PIERLUISI, Mr. POLIS of Colorado, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. 

TITUS, Ms. WOOLSEY, and Mr. WU) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to permit 

the establishment of Jobs Corps centers in territories 

of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF TERRITORIES FOR JOBS 

4 CORPS CENTERS. 

5 Section 147(a) of the Workforce Investment Act of 

6 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2887(a)) is amended— 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3181 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ‘‘or simi2 lar agency of an outlying area,’’ after ‘‘local agen3 cy’’; and 

4 (2) in paragraph (2)(B)(i)(III), by inserting 

5 ‘‘(or outlying area)’’ after ‘‘State’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                                 iVideoNow, Inc.
                        383 Inverness Parkway, Suite 100
                               Englewood, CO 80112


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In Connection  with the quarterly  report of iVideoNow,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I Kevin R. Keating,
President of the Company,  certify, to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







                             /s/  Kevin  R.  Keating
                             --------------------------------
                             Kevin  R.  Keating
                             President
                             iVideoNow,  Inc.

                             August 13, 2003



                                       13

<PAGE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 3.1
 AMENDMENT TO BY-LAW NUMBER 2
OF
MAD CATZ INTERACTIVE, INC.,
(the Corporation)
   (a)
    
    upon presentation of the certificate representing such
shares with a transfer endorsed thereon, or delivered therewith, or in
the case of uncertificated shares, upon presentation of a transfer, in
either case duly executed by the registered holder or by the registered
holders attorney or successor duly appointed;




---



##### 



(a)
    
    so requests before the Corporation has notice that the
security has been acquired by a bona fide purchaser;(b)
    
    unless the board otherwise determines in a particular
case, furnishes the Corporation with an indemnity bond sufficient, in
the discretion of the board, to protect the Corporation; and(c)
    
    satisfies any other reasonable requisites imposed by
the Corporation from time to time, whether generally or in any
particular case.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6199

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ZACHARY JAMES HAYES, a/k/a Zachery James

Hayes,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CR-93-121-6, CA-96-668-6)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zachary James Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal from the district court's orders

granting in part and denying in part his motion filed under 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), and denying his motion

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinions accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Hayes, Nos. CR-93-121-6; CA-96-668-6 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 1996; Jan.

21, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 4.5


    
      

      

    

    Exhibit
      4.5

     

     

    CONVERSION
      AGREEMENT

    


    This
      Agreement executed on March
      12, 2007
      is made
      by and between Cobalis
      Corp.,
      a
      Nevada corporation (the “Company”) with its principal place of business located
      at 2445 McCabe Way, Suite 150, Irvine CA 92614 and Andrew
      Callari (the “Consultant”),
      with a
      principal place of business located at 600 Anton Blvd., 11th
      Floor,
      Costa Mesa, CA 92626.

    


    NOW
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the covenants and
      obligations set forth below and for other good and valuable consideration,
      the
      receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree
      as
      follows:

    


    Consulting
      Fees Conversion:
      The
      Consultant has rendered litigation legal services to the Company continuously
      since December 2006, and submitted to the Company two invoices (#1553 and 1582)
      with a balance due of $31,698 (thirty-one thousand six hundred ninety-eight)
      as
      of March 12, 2007. 

    


    The
      Parties hereby agree to convert the full amount due of $31,698 (thirty-one
      thousand six hundred ninety-eight) into 32,346 (thirty-two thousand three
      hundred forty-six) fully-paid and non-assessable free trading shares, at the
      conversion rate of $0.98 (closing price of the Company’s stock on March 9, 2007)
      per share, upon the execution of this Agreement. 

    


    Furthermore,
      the Parties agree to convert $30,000 (thirty thousand) of Consultant’s retainer
      fees for his future legal litigation services to the Company into 30,612 (thirty
      thousand six hundred twelve) fully-paid and non-assessable free trading shares,
      at the conversion rate of $0.98 (closing price of the Company’s stock on March
      9, 2007) per share, upon the execution of this Agreement and submission of
      applicable invoice(s) for the actual subsequent services. 

    


    The
      Company agrees to take immediate steps to file S-8 registration with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission in order to fulfill its obligation to the
      Consultant.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
      date
      first written above.

     

     

    
      	The Company
              (Cobalis,
              Corp.)	 	 	The Consultant
              (Andrew
              Callari)
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Chaslav
              Radovich	 	 	/s/ 
	
              
                

              

              Chaslav Radovich

            	 	 	
              
Andrew
              Callari
	President 	 	 	 


    

    
 

     

    1
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4
                                                                    ------------



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated August 14, 1997, originally included in Rykoff-Sexton, Inc.'s Form
10-K, as amended by Form 10-K/A, for the fiscal year ended June 28, 1997, and
subsequently included in this Form 10-K/A-1 dated September 24, 1998, into U.S.
Foodservice's (formerly JP Foodservices, Inc.) previously filed Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-88140, 33-88142, 33-88144, 33-88146, 33-
81011, 333-37359, 333-43185, 333-47759) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-59785).



Arthur Andersen LLP


Philadelphia, PA
January 12, 1999
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, David C. Nolan, is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc. (the Company). This statement is being furnished in connection with the
filing by the Company of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and                                                             
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request



|Date: | March 29, 2007 |  | /s/ David C. Nolan                 | 
|----- | -------------- |  | ---------------------------------- | 
|      |                |  | David C. Nolan                     | 
|      |                |  | Executive Vice President and Chief | 
|      |                |  | Financial Officer                  | 

---
Exhibit 32.1


              Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David
Dutton, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: March 15, 2004                   /s/ DAVID DUTTON
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                           David Dutton
                                           Chief Executive Officer
EX-35 (c)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 13, 2007

Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc.

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc., Home
Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-HE1

Per Section 3.13 A of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 2/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such Additional Servicer's performance under this
     Agreement, or such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional
     Servicer, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
     applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer (other than the
     Servicer, the Master Servicer or the Securities Administrator), in all
     material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there has
     been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect,
     specifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and
     status thereof.


Certified By:
/s/ Reid Denny
Reid Denny, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2964 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow refunds of Federal 

motor fuel excise taxes on fuels used in mobile mammography vehicles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2009 

Mr. HELLER (for himself, Ms. BEAN, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. CAO, Mr. REICHERT, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, and Mr. AUSTRIA) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow refunds of Federal motor fuel excise taxes on fuels used 

in mobile mammography vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mobile Mammography 

5 Promotion Act of 2009’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2964 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFUNDS OF FEDERAL MOTOR FUEL EXCISE TAXES 

2 FOR FUEL USED IN MOBILE MAMMOGRAPHY 

3 VEHICLES. 

4 (a) REFUNDS.—Section 6427 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 (relating to fuels not used for taxable 

6 purposes) is amended by inserting after subsection (f) the 

7 following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(g) FUELS USED IN MOBILE MAMMOGRAPHY VEHI9 CLES.—Except as provided in subsection (k), if any fuel 

10 on which tax was imposed by section 4041 or 4081 is used 

11 in any highway vehicle designed exclusively to provide mo12 bile mammography services to patients within such vehi13 cle, the Secretary shall pay (without interest) to the ulti14 mate purchaser of such fuel an amount equal to the aggre15 gate amount of the tax imposed on such fuel.’’. 

16 (b) EXEMPTION FROM RETAIL TAX.—Section 4041 

17 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the fol18 lowing new subsection: 

19 ‘‘(n) FUELS USED IN MOBILE MAMMOGRAPHY VEHI20 CLES.—No tax shall be imposed under this section on any 

21 liquid sold for use in, or used in, any highway vehicle de22 signed exclusively to provide mobile mammography serv23 ices to patients within such vehicle.’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2964 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

3 of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
#### Conrad L. SLOCUMB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eileen DELANEY, NP Medical; Sheronda Smith, RN KCI Medical; Dr. Cross, MD KCI Medical; Michael Bejhor, MD SCDC Medical Director; Renee Williams, KCI Mental Health; Clyde Holliday, KCI Mental Health; Jim Page, KCI Mental Health, personal and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-6617.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 30, 2011,

Decided: April 8, 2011.

Conrad L. Slocumb, Appellant Pro Se. Janet Brooks Holmes, Daniel Roy Settana, *273Jr., McKay, Cauthen, Settana & Stubley, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Conrad L. Slocumb, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Slocumb v. Delaney,*No. 9:09-cv-00458-HMH, 2010 WL 1345270 (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*