alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-33 (i)
(logo) REGULUS


Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria

1. Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100 - Asset Backed Securities, 17 C.F.R. section
   229. 1100-229.1123 ("Regulation AB"), Regulus Group LLC, for itself and its
   wholly-owned subsidiaries (individually and collectively "Regulus"), is
   responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria
   applicable to the remittance processing services it provides to customers who
   are issuers or servicers of asset backed securities transactions and who have
   requested confirmation of Regulus' compliance in connection with loan and/or
   receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities
   transactions (the "Platform"). Remittance processing is a service whereby
   check payments that are remitted by mail to a post office box are collected,
   processed through a highly automated data capture system, and prepared for
   deposit to a bank account held by the beneficiary of the payment.

2. The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB were used
   in Regulus' assessment of compliance. Regulus has concluded that the
   servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of
   Regulation AB are applicable to the servicing activities it performs with
   respect to the Platform (such criteria the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").
   Regulus has concluded that the remainder of the servicing criteria set forth
   in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the activities it
   performs with respect to the Platform because Regulus does not participate in
   the servicing activities referenced by such servicing criteria.

3. As of and for the year ending December 31, 2006, Regulus has complied in all
   material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria set forth in Item
   1122(d) of Regulation AB.

4. KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
   report on Regulus' assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
   Criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2006. A copy of that
   attestation report is attached hereto as Exhibit A.


/s/ Kimberlee Clark
Kimberlee Clark
Chief Financial Officer

February 22, 2007


860 LATOUR COURT | NAPA, CA | 94558 | TEL: 707.254.4000 | FAX: 707.254.4070
| REGULU5GROUP.COM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Evaluation and Testing Services for Vaccines and Other Biologics for Diseases (N01).                    

*Date:*                         November 14, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Annie Walker-Abbey, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-627-3390,                         *aabbey@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 17, 2017.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-22825 Filed 10-19-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION








I, Thomas M. Pierno, certify that:





1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rosetta Stone Inc.; and





2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








By:/s/ THOMAS M. PIERNOThomas M. Pierno(Principal Financial Officer)





Date: April 29, 2015
#### Dilleon Greene, Appellant, v Abrami Enterprises, Inc., Doing Business as Empire Roller Disco, et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[666 NYS2d 502]

—Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.), dated October 28, 1996.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs, for *544reasons stated by Justice Greenstein at the Supreme Court. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Thompson and Altman, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                Certification of the Principal Executive Officers
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

We, Morris H. Wheeler, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Robert W.
Pawlak, the Chief Financial Officer of Cohesant Technologies Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended November 30,
2002 (the "Report"):

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and
                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.

/s/ Morris H. Wheeler
---------------------
Morris H. Wheeler
President and Chief Executive Officer
June 25, 2003

/s/ Robert W. Pawlak
--------------------
Robert W. Pawlak
Chief Financial Officer
June 25, 2003
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------


                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of PalWeb
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the Period Ended August 31, 2002 (the "Report"), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 14, 2002                        /s/ William W. Rahhal
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               William W. Rahhal
                                               Chief Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 29, 2019

No. 04-19-00298-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Isabella RODRIGUEZ,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 571187

Honorable Melissa Vera, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw Motion to Abate and Remand is hereby 

GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on May 29, 2019.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                          21,691
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,705
<INVENTORY>                                     73,824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,719
<PP&E>                                          41,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,603
<BONDS>                                         69,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,346
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,238
<SALES>                                        244,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               244,855
<CGS>                                          128,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,366)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,785
<INCOME-TAX>                                       821
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,964
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOHN KEVIN LYNCH,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 15

- 00180

- CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#20140D00206)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Hughes, J. (Not Participating)
Exhibit 11




                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED              SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                    June 30,                        June 30,
                                            ---------------------------    ----------------------------
                                                2001            2000            2001           2000
                                            ---------------------------    ----------------------------
<S>                                         <C>            <C>             <C>             <C>
Net (loss) per share - basic and diluted:
   Numerator, net (loss) ................   $(1,731,188)   $   (880,544)   $ (3,730,327)   $ (1,453,952)
                                            ===========================================================

   Denominator, weighted average shares
      Outstanding .......................    19,605,811      13,543,958      19,126,995      13,543,958
                                            ===========================================================

Net (loss) per share - basic and diluted:
   Net (loss) per share .................   $     (0.09)  $      (0.05)   $      (0.20)   $      (0.11)
                                            ==========================================================

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:                          ( print page 48727)    

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Advisory Committee for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (#66).                

*Date and Time:*

November 16, 2017; 12:30 p.m.-5:15 p.m.

November 17, 2017; 8:30 a.m.-2:45 p.m.

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314.                

*Meeting Information: https://www.nsf.gov/​mps/​advisory.jsp*.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Person:*                     Tamara Savage, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314; Email:                     *tasavage@nsf.gov.*

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice, recommendations, and counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to mathematical and physical sciences programs and activities.                

## Agenda

### Thursday, November 16, 2017

    - Meeting opening, FACA briefing, introductions, and approval of previous meeting minutes
    - MPS updates
    - Division updates
    - More effective external partnerships, part 1
    - Strategy discussion about Big Ideas
    - Prep for meeting with the NSF Director and COO

### Friday, November 17, 2017

    - Meeting opening and FACA briefing
    - More effective external partnerships, part 2
    - Meeting with the NSF Director and COO
    - Debrief and discussion on meeting with the NSF Director and COO
    - Forming a sub-committee to assess the Physics Frontiers program
    - Continued discussion about external partnerships and Big Ideas
    - Wrap up and opportunity for public Q&A/comments

Dated: October 16, 2017.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-22666 Filed 10-18-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### Rafael Augusto GUEVARA ALFONSO; Martha Judice Gonzalez Sanchez; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-71151.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Cii'cuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 5, 2008.

Xavier Gonzales, Esq., Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Alison Marie Igoe, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rafael Augusto Guevara Alfonso, his wife and their daughter, natives and citizens of Colombia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying them motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review denials of motions to reconsider for abuse of discretion. *Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft,*383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), *amended by*404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005) (order). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review petitioners’ contentions relating to the denial of them application for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture because this petition for review is not timely as to the BIA’s October 30, 2003 order. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1258 (9th Cir.1996).

Motions to reconsider must “state the reasons for the motion by specifying the errors of fact or law in the prior Board decision and shall be supported by pertinent authority.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1). Petitioners’ motion to reconsider did not identify any errors of law or fact in the previous BIA decision. Therefore, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.

Petitioner Martha Judith Gonzalez Sanchez’s motion for an extension of time to file her supplemental brief is granted. The Clerk shall file the brief received on March 5, 2008.

On April 21, 2008, the court received a motion to withdraw as counsel of record from Paul Agu, counsel for Petitioners Rafael Augusto Guevara Alfonso and his daughter. This motion is granted. In the motion, Mr. Agu states that Petitioners informed him that they have retained new counsel, but the court has not received a Notice of Appearance from this new counsel for Guevara Alfonso or his daughter. Accordingly, the Clerk shall file the motion to withdraw, amend the docket to reflect that Guevara Alfonso and his daughter are *704proceeding pro se and that their address is 6437 Pearcrest Road, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89108. Xavier Gonzales represents Petitioner Sanchez but not Petitioners Guevara Alfonso or his daughter.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                            6,454
<SECURITIES>                                        721
<RECEIVABLES>                                       194
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (10)
<INVENTORY>                                         113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6,850
<PP&E>                                            4,211
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3,557
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   11,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4,185
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                       1,745
<COMMON>                                            166
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     11,909
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3,051
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   48
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (463)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (463)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)



</TABLE>
#### Lawrence D. Gadley, Appellant, v U.S. Sugar Company, Inc., Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 96]

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the ad damnum clause of the complaint. Absent prejudice to a defendant, “a motion to amend the *ad damnum*clause, whether made before or after trial, should generally be granted” *(Loomis v Civetta*
      *1113
      *Corinno Constr. Corp.,*54 NY2d 18, 23, *rearg denied*55 NY2d 801; *see, Smith v Lift-A-Loft Equip.,*210 AD2d 989). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.— Amend Complaint.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Callahan, Balio and Fallon, JJ.