alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.7

January 23, 2003

STRICTLY PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
HAND DELIVERED, ORIGINAL TO FILE

Dear Ellen:

I am pleased to reconfirm your position as Senior Vice President Legal and
Compliance, Corporate Secretary, at ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC. This letter is
intended to replace any other previous employment letters and/or contracts,
between you and ALDERWOODS GROUP INC.; and details your new salary increase,
effective on the February 4, 2003 payroll.

REPORTS TO:                         PAUL HOUSTON, PRESIDENT AND CEO
LOCATION:                           2225 SHEPPARD AVENUE EAST, SUITE 1100
                                    TORONTO, ONTARIO M2J 5C2

Please find listed below an outline of your employment terms;

     1)   BASE SALARY; your base salary is $190,000 CDN ( paid bi-weekly )

     2)   ANNUAL INCENTIVE; you are entitled to participate at the annual
          executive level of 40% target and 80% maximum. Program details
          supplied to you .

     3)   STOCK OPTIONS; you will be entitled to participate in the stock option
          program. The details of this grant will be covered by a separate stock
          option agreement as determined and administrated by the Board of
          Directors.

     4)   BENEFITS PROGRAMS; you will be covered by the company's benefits
          programs, covering medical and dental plans.

     5)   ANNUAL MEDICAL; you are entitled to take a company paid annual
          medical.

     6)   RRSP PENSION; you will be eligible company's RRSP program in which you
          can make deposits and the company will match the value.

     7)   CAR ALLOWANCE; you will be entitled to $600.00 CDN/ month (paid
          bi-weekly ).

     8)   VACATION ENTITLEMENT; you are eligible for four (4) weeks vacation per
          year.

     9)   TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT; if you should be terminated for any reason
          other than just cause, you will be entitled to receive twelve (12)
          months severance.

     10)  CHANGE OF CONTROL; if there is a change in control whereby 51% or more
          of the company's shares change hands and as a result your employment
          is terminated, you will receive 24 months severance.


Sincerely,                                          Acceptance:

-------------------------------                     ----------------------------
Paul Houston, President and CEO                     Ellen Neeman
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1994-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations
contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         37,021
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               61,742
<PP&E>                                         2,018,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,480,230)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 600,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,744
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     592,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   600,473
<SALES>                                        136,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               469,937
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  74,223<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                312,059
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            312,059
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   312,059
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0

<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation and
amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and interest expense.
</FN>


</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3139 

To extend the authorization of the national flood insurance program, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2009 

Ms. WATERS (for herself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mrs. CAPITO, Ms. 

MATSUI, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. JONES, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. KANJORSKI, 

Mr. GERLACH, and Mr. HINOJOSA) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization of the national flood insurance 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE 

4 PROGRAM. 

5 (a) PROGRAM EXTENSION.—Section 1319 of the Na6 tional Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2008’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘March 31, 2010’’. 


jbell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3139 IH

1 (b) FINANCING.—Section 1309(a) of such Act (42 

2 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 

3 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘March 31, 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM FOR MITIGATION 

5 OF SEVERE REPETITIVE LOSS PROPERTIES. 

6 Section 1361A of the National Flood Insurance Act 

7 of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4102a) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (k)(1), by striking ‘‘2005, 

9 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘2009 

10 and 2010’’; and 

11 (2) by striking subsection (l). 

Æ 


jbell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 8.1



Subsidiaries of Registrant



|Name of undertaking                    |  | Country of registration |  | Activity                            |  | % holding |    
|-------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | --------- | ---
|GW Pharma Limited                      |  | England and Wales       |  | Research and Development            |  |           | 100
|GW Research Limited                    |  | England and Wales       |  | Research and Development            |  |           | 100
|Greenwich Biosciences Inc.             |  | United States           |  | Pharmaceutical development services |  |           | 100
|GWP Trustee Company Limited            |  | England and Wales       |  | Employee Share Ownership            |  |           | 100
|Cannabinoid Research Institute Limited |  | England and Wales       |  | Dormant                             |  |           | 100
|Guernsey Pharmaceuticals Limited       |  | Guernsey                |  | Dormant                             |  |           | 100
|G-Pharm Limited                        |  | England and Wales       |  | Dormant                             |  |           | 100
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22279]



[[Page 48071]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2420-001.
    Applicants: Alcoa Power Generating Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Amendment to Supplemental TSA to be 
effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20171010-5214.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-49-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Service Agreement 
Recollation to be effective 10/10/2017.
    Filed Date: 10/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20171010-5250.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-50-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Administrative Filing 
Amendment for ER17-2379-000 to be effective 8/30/2017.
    Filed Date: 10/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20171010-5265.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-51-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Interconnection Service 
Agreement No. 3808, Queue No. AB2-050 to be effective 9/7/2017.
    Filed Date: 10/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20171010-5285.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-52-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original Service Agreement 
No. 4795; Queue AC2-139 (WMPA) to be effective 9/8/2017.
    Filed Date: 10/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20171010-5291.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: October 10, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-22279 Filed 10-13-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6685

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT AUGUSTINE D’ANJOU, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-86-MU) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 8, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Augustine D’Anjou, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Appeals from the denial of a motion pursuant to § 3582(c)(2) are considered criminal appeals for purposes of Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). 2 PER CURIAM: Robert Augustine D’Anjou seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s prior order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (1994). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because D’Anjou’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties in a criminal case* are accorded ten days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” United States v. Raynor , 939 F.2d 191, 197 (4th Cir. 1991). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on March1, 2000. D’Anjou’s notice of appeal was filed on May 1, 2000. Because D’Anjou failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NO. 07-05-0159-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	MAY 25, 2005

	______________________________

	IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.M., A CHILD

		_________________________________

	FROM THE 237TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2001-516,052; HONORABLE SAM MEDINA, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant James A. Miller filed a notice of accelerated appeal, received by the trial court on April 18, 2005, stating that he was appealing a March 30, 2005 judgment terminating his parent-child relationship with the minor child, A.R.M.1

	The notice of appeal was received by this Court on April 22, 2005, and by letter that same day the clerk of this Court notified appellant that the filing fee had not been paid, and that failure to pay it could result in dismissal. Appellant filed an affidavit of indigence with the trial court on April 25, 2005, pursuant to Rule 20.1 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.  A motion requesting an extension of time to file appellant’s affidavit of indigence was filed with this Court April 29, 2005.  Tex. R. App. P. 10.5 (b), 20.1(c)(3).	

	On April 29, 2005, the trial court held a hearing pursuant to section 263.405(e) of the Texas Family Code for the purpose of determining if appellant was indigent and whether the appeal was frivolous, and to consider appellant’s motion for new trial. Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 263.405(e) (Vernon 2002). The trial court signed an order the same day denying appellant’s motion for new trial, denying his request to proceed as indigent, and finding his appeal to be frivolous. That order has not been appealed.2

	The clerk of this Court notified appellant by letter on May 6, 2005, that his motion for extension of time to file the affidavit of indigence was denied.  He was directed by letter to pay the filing fee on or before May 16, 2005.  The letter again advised him that failure to pay the filing fee could result in the appeal being dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

	Appellant is not excused by statute or the Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs. Tex. R. App. P. 5.  Appellant has failed to comply with the requirement that he pay the filing fee this Court is obligated to collect, and with this Court’s orders with respect to the filing fee.  All parties having had more than ten days’ notice that dismissal could result from appellant’s continued failure to comply with the rules and this Court’s orders, the appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).

							James T. Campbell

							         Justice
AMENDMENT
      NO. 1 TO THE

     

    MMC
      ENERGY, INC.

     

    2006
      EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

     

    W
      I T N E S S E T H:

     

    WHEREAS,
      Section
      16 of the MMC Energy, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) authorizes
      the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of MMC Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the “Corporation”), to amend the Plan at any time; and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the
      Board now finds it desirable and in the best interests of the Corporation to
      increase the number of shares of common stock of the Corporation, par value
      $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), authorized for issuance under the Plan by
      3,000,000 shares,

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE,
      the
      Plan is amended, effective as of September 20, 2006, as follows:

     

    First
      and Only Change

     

    The
      first
      sentence of Section 4 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows
      (revisions are indicated by underscoring):

     

    “Subject
      to Section 14 of the Plan, there shall be reserved for issuance under the Plan
      an aggregate of 5,000,000
      shares
      of Company Stock, which may be authorized but un-issued shares, or shares held
      in the Company’s treasury, or shares purchased from stockholders expressly for
      use under the Plan.”

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF,
      the
      Corporation has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized
      officers this 22 day of September, 2006.

     

     

    
      	ATTEST: 	 	MMC
              ENERGY,
              INC.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
              By:

            	
              /s/
                Martin V. Quinn

            	 	
              By:

            	
              /s/
                Denis G. Gagnon
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00670-CR

NO. 03-07-00671-CR

Charles Leonard Myers, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NOS. 725784 & 725786, HONORABLE MIKE DENTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On October 22, 2007, the Clerk received Charles Leonard Myers’s pro se “motions

to appeal” convictions in cause numbers 725784 and 725786. Treating the motions as notices of

appeal, the Clerk notified the trial court clerk. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(c)(1). We have been

informed by the clerk that in cause number 725784, Myers was convicted of violating a protective

order following a plea of no contest. Sentence of 180 days in jail was imposed on

November 13, 2006. Cause number 725786 was dismissed on the State’s motion on

November 13, 2006.

Myers’s notice of appeal from the conviction in cause number 725784 was not timely

filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). We lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any

manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208
2

(Tex. Crim. App.1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). There is

nothing to appeal in cause number 725786. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 9, 2008

Do Not Publish
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3294 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Department of 

Defense to support the Ocean for Life Program of the National Marine 

Sanctuaries under the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 

including covering the cost of participants in the Ocean for Life Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2009 

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, and Mr. PUTNAM) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the 

Department of Defense to support the Ocean for Life 

Program of the National Marine Sanctuaries under the 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, including covering the cost of participants in the Ocean 

for Life Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3294 IH

1 SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SUPPORT FOR 

2 OCEAN FOR LIFE PROGRAM OF THE NA3 TIONAL MARINE SANCTUARIES UNDER THE 

4 NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC AD5 MINISTRATION. 

6 Section 184(g) of title 10, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘The Director’’; 

9 and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(2)(A) The Department of Defense, including com13 batant commands and Regional Centers, may provide ma14 terial and personnel support to assist in the planning and 

15 execution of the Ocean for Life Program of the National 

16 Marine Sanctuaries under the National Oceanic and At17 mospheric Administration. 

18 ‘‘(B) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this sub19 section and paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (f), the 

20 Department of Defense, including combatant commands 

21 and Regional Centers, may pay all or a portion of the costs 

22 incurred to facilitate citizens of the United States and for23 eign nationals to participate in the Ocean for Life Pro24 gram. Amounts available to the Regional Centers from the 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3294 IH

1 Department of Defense ‘Voice’ programs may be used to 

2 make the payments authorized by this subparagraph.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
PVF Capital Corp.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-97450, No. 33-86116, No. 333-48446 and No. 333-14601) on Form S-8 of PVF
Capital Corp. of our report dated July 27, 2001, relating to the consolidated
statements of financial condition of PVF Capital Corp. and subsidiaries as of
June 30, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended June 30, 2001, which report appears in the June 30, 2002 Annual
Report on Form 10-K of PVF Capital Corp.



/s/ KPMG LLP


Cleveland, Ohio
September 23, 2002
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 10, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 10, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16I0045. CHRISTOPHER PALMER v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

14CR381