alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>           THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                   EXTRACTED FROM THE OXIR INVESTMENTS, INC. FINANCIAL
                   STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
                   QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
                   STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>       1

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          48,617
<SECURITIES>                                 4,937,524
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,990,110
<PP&E>                                       5,928,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,229,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,656,947
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,956,769
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,410,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,229,880
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,275,126
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,251,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,936,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                   362,606
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,573,660
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,573,660
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
#### Brenda BRYANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CAYCE; M.L. Brakefield, South Carolina Cayce Police Officer, individually and as agent and employee of the City of Cayce; W.E. Ackerman, South Carolina Cayce Police Officer, individually and as agent and employee of the City of Cayce; Officer Popenhagen, South Carolina Cayce Police Officer, individually and as agent and employee of the City of Cayce; Masters Economy Inn, Incorporated; Roger Armstrong, Manager, individually and as the agent and employee of Masters Economy Inn, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-1682.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 16, 2011.

Decided: April 7, 2011.

Brenda Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Andrew Linde-mann, Davidson & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Sterling Graydon Davies, Clary Edward Rawl, Jr., McAn-gus, Goudelock & Courie, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brenda Bryant appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and conclude there was no reversible error in any of the district court’s dispositive rulings. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Bryant v. City of Cayce,*No. 3:06-cv-00333-MJP (D.S.C. Oct. 24, 2007 & May 19, 2010). We further deny as moot Bryant’s motion to hold this appeal in abeyance pending the district court’s resolution of her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. Finally, we deny Bryant’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard REDFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-30325.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*697Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 5, 2008.

James E. Seykora, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Steven C. Babcock, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Richard Redfield appeals from the 72-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea for depredation of government property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1361. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Redfield contends that, under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the district court did not adequately consider and explain the reasons for its sentence. This contention is belied by the record. *See Rita v. United States,*— U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468-69, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); *see also United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir.2008) (stating that the district court need not tick off each of the section 3553(a) factors to show that it had considered them).

We also conclude that Redfield’s sentence was not substantively unreasonable in light of the facts and circumstances of this case. *See Gall v. United States,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007) (explaining that sentencing judges are “in a superior position to find facts and judge them import under § 3553(a)”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Charles M. Sprock, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc. (the Company). This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and                                                             
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
Report.
|

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

|      |                  |  |                                      
|----- | ---------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: | November 6, 2008 |  | /s/ Charles M. Sprock                
|      |                  |  | Charles M. Sprock                    
|      |                  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q
for the period ending August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren F.
Kruger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





October
      20, 2008
            
            /s/ Warren
      F. KrugerWarren
      F. KrugerPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part
of the Report.
Exhibit 21  Subsidiaries

The following is a list of all subsidiaries of the Company:



|                                                  |  |                              |  |                     |  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------------- | -
|Name of Subsidiary                                |  | Jurisdictionof Incorporation |  | OwnershipPercentage |  
|Progressive Concepts, Inc. (acquired August 2006) |  | Texas                        |  | 100                 | %
|Teletouch Licenses, Inc.                          |  | Delaware                     |  | 100                 | %
|Visao Systems, Inc.                               |  | Delaware                     |  | 100                 | %
|TLL Georgia, Inc.                                 |  | Delaware                     |  | 100                 | %
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Jim Tolonen, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Business Objects,S.A.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: March 12, 2004    /s/ James R. Tolonen   James R. Tolonen Chief Financial Officer and Senior GroupVice President
Cause No. PD-0143-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

OF TEXAS 

CYNTHIA AMBROSE, §

Appellee/Petitioner, §

§ FROM THE FOURTH

vs. § COURT OF APPEALS

§ SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS, § 04-13-00788-CR

Appellant/Respondent. §

PETITIONER’S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AT ORAL ARGUMENT 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: 

Now comes the CYNTHIA AMBROSE, Petitioner, by and through her 

undersigned counsel, Dayna L. Jones, and hereby gives notice to the Court that the 

undersigned counsel will appear on October 7, 2015 at 9 a.m. and present oral 

argument. 

 Respectfully submitted: 

 ___/s/ Dayna L. Jones______

DAYNA L. JONES 

Bar No. 24049450 

LAW OFFICE OF DAYNA L. JONES 

1800 McCullough 

San Antonio, Texas 78212 

(210) 255-8525 office 

(210) 223-3248 facsimile 

 Attorney for Petitioner, 

 CYNTHIA AMBROSE 

PD-0143-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 9/3/2015 4:23:28 PM

Accepted 9/3/2015 4:29:29 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the above foregoing Unopposed Motion for 

Extension of Time to File Brief has been served via e-mail through the EFSP 

Electronic Filing System, to S. Patrick Ballantyne, Assistant Criminal District 

Attorney, sballantyne@bexar.org, on this the 3

rd day of September, 2015.

By: ___/s/ Dayna L. Jones______

DAYNA L. JONES
Order Enter ed October 21 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 01179

- CV

IN RE LEE JEROME LEWIS , Relator
Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14

- 5207

- X



### ORDER Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Stoddart Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’ s petition for writ of
mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

/s/ C RAIG STODDART JUSTICE
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL ) TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for ) Residential Asset Securitization ) Trust Series 2006-A13 Mortgage ) Pass Through Certificate Series ) 2006-M, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-6029 ) GERALD A. PAPPA and HOLLY L. ) PAPPA, ) ) Appellees. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed September 23, 2016.
A ppeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Perry A. Little, Senior Judge. Benjamin D. Ladouceur of Clarfield, Okon, Salomone & Pincus, P.L., Tampa, for Appellant. Michael Alex Wasylik of Ricardo & Wasylik, P.L., Dade City, for Appellees.

NORTHCUTT, Judge. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company appeals the order of sum mary judgment dismissing without prejudice its foreclosure claim aga inst the Pappas. In the- 2 - motion for summary judgment, the Pappas asserted that the notic e of the default letter failed to comply with paragraph twenty-two of the mortgage, whi ch specified what information the default letter was required to provide. We con clude, however, that the default letter substantially complied with the requirements of paragraph twenty-two. See Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Milam, 177 So. 3d 7 (Fla. 2d D CA 2015); Bank of N.Y. v. Mieses, 187 So. 3d 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). Accordingly , we reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.

SALARIO, J., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur

.
Exhibit 32



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Intermix Media, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the SEC on or
about the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Richard M. Rosenblatt, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lisa Terrill, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |  |  |                              
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 15, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard M. Rosenblatt    
|                      |  |  |  | Richard M. Rosenblatt        
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 15, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Lisa Terrill             
|                      |  |  |  | Lisa Terrill                 
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                      |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 31.1

I, Steve Careaga, CEO of the Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Reality Wireless
Networks, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Dated:  February 2, 2006               /s/ Steve Careaga
                                       --------------------------
                                       Its:  Chief Executive Officer, Principal
                                       Financial Officer/Acting Chief Financial
                                       Officer, Director
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-10343

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BETTY JEAN GREEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:99-CR-251-1

---------------------

September 5, 2000

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Betty Jean Green has filed a motion

to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Green was sent a copy of counsel’s motion and brief,

but she has not filed a response. Our review of the brief filed by

counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous point for

appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas-Energy for the Nineties
Public #8 Ltd. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                        /s/ Freddie M. Kotek
                        -------------------------------------------------------
                        Freddie M. Kotek
                        Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner
                        11/14/03



                                       18