alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
              RAMP SERIES 2006-NC2 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.  2. To the best of my  knowledge,  based on such  review,  the
     Servicer  has  fulfilled  all  of  its  obligations  under  the  applicable
     servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:  /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
     -------------------------
    Name: Anthony N. Renzi
    Title: Managing Director
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes
      - Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Professional Lease Management Income Fund
      I, L.L.C., (the “Fund”), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, the President of the Manager and of the Fund, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)  the
      Report of the Fund filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.














/s/ Paul
      M. Leand


Paul
      M. Leand


President
      of PLM Financial Services,
      Inc.


March
      29,
      2006
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

Parsons Government Services, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 61306, 61307 

) 61308,61309 

) 

Under Contract Nos. DACA87-97-D-0008 ) 

DAAA09-03-D-0023 ) 

DE-AC09-02SR22210 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

Kevin J. Slattum, Esq. 

Aaron S. Ralph, Esq. 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

Los Angeles, CA 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Carol L. Matsunaga, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Carson, CA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 1 March 2018 

dministratlve Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61306, 61307, 61308, 61309, Appeals of 

Parsons Government Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
EX-10.1 2nd Amendment to Cash Bonus Incentive Plan



 






Exhibit 10.1




SECOND AMENDMENT

TO THE

CHICO’S FAS, INC.

2005 CASH BONUS INCENTIVE PLAN




     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE CHICO’S FAS, INC. 2005 CASH BONUS INCENTIVE PLAN is made and
entered into on the date set forth below by Chico’s FAS, Inc. (the “Company”).



W I T N E S S E T H:




     WHEREAS, the Company has established the Chico’s FAS, Inc. Cash Bonus Incentive Plan (as
previously amended, the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”) is authorized to further amend the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, on April 11, 2007, the Committee authorized the adoption of an amendment to the Plan
to extend the Plan such that the Plan continues to apply for the Company’s 2007 fiscal year.



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of February 4, 2007, Section 2(h) of the Plan is deleted in its
entirety and the following is substituted in lieu thereof:




     (h) “PERFORMANCE PERIOD” means, as applicable, (i) the Company’s 2005 fiscal year
or any portion thereof designated by the Committee or (ii) the Company’s 2006 fiscal
year or any portion thereof designated by the Committee or (iii) the Company’s 2007
fiscal year or any portion thereof.



     IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to be executed by its duly
authorized officer this 11th day of April, 2007, but effective for all purposes as of
February 4, 2007.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CHICO’S FAS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Michael J. Kincaid
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Michael J. Kincaid 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President—Finance, Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Viva
International, Inc. for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2004, I, Robert J. Scott,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Viva International, Inc.
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
          2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended June 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Viva
          International, Inc.

Dated:  August 27, 2004

VIVA INTERNATIONAL, INC.


/s/    Robert J. Scott
---------------------------
Robert J. Scott
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Richard Ferguson certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CoConnect, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    /s/ Richard Ferguson Richard Ferguson, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  November 16, 2006
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert Lee MORELAND, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50734

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 5, 2011.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bem-porad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Robert Lee Moreland appeals the sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release subsequent to his convictions for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance. More-land argues that his 24-month sentence, which was outside of the recommended guidelines range, was unreasonable. Moreland did not object to his sentence. Accordingly, we review his appeal for plain error only. *See United States v. Whitelaw,*580 F.3d 256, 259-60 (5th Cir.2009); *see also Puckett v. United States,*556 U.S. 129, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 1429, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009).

Because the 24-month sentence More-land received on revocation was less than the term authorized by statute, it is “clearly legal.” *United States v. Pena,*125 F.3d 285, 288 (5th Cir.1997). Moreover, this court has “routinely upheld release revocation sentences in excess of the advisory range but within the statutory maximum” as satisfying both the plainly unreasonable and unreasonableness standards. *United States v. Jones,*182 Fed.Appx. 343, 344 (5th Cir.2006) (per curiam); *see United*
      *361
      *States v. McKinney,*520 F.3d 425, 428 (5th Cir.2008).

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3339 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3339

 To reauthorize the Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2009

  Mr. Heinrich (for himself and Mrs. Lummis) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FLTFA Reauthorization Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL LAND TRANSACTION FACILITATION ACT AMENDMENTS.

    The Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act (43 U.S.C. 2301 et 
seq.) is amended as follows:
            (1) In section 203(2), by striking ``on the date of 
        enactment of this Act was'' and inserting ``is''.
            (2) In section 205(a), by striking ``(as in effect on the 
        date of enactment of this Act)''.
            (3) By striking subsection (d) of section 205.
            (4) By striking subsection (f) of section 206.
            (5) In section 207(b)--
                    (A) By striking ``under--'' and inserting ``under 
                the following:''.
                    (B) In paragraph (1), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a period.
                    (C) By amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
            ``(2) Public Law 105-263 (the Southern Nevada Public Land 
        Management Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2343)), as amended.''.
                    (D) By adding at the end of subsection (b), the 
                following:
            ``(3) Sections 301 through 307 of Public Law 109-432 
        (commonly known as the `White Pine County Conservation, 
        Recreation, and Development Act of 2006' (120 Stat. 3028)).
            ``(4) Public Law 108-424 (commonly known as the `Lincoln 
        County Conservation, Recreation, and Development Act of 2004' 
        (118 Stat. 2403)).''.
                                 <all>
```
| Exhibit 31.1 |
|--------------|

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Rodolfo J. Dominguez, certify that:

 
| 1. | I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Viva International, Inc.; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, this amended report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amended report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.        The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)       Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.        The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
| Dated: August 21, 2006 | By: */s/ Rodolfo J. Dominguez* |
|------------------------|--------------------------------|

Rodolfo J. Dominguezt, Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10.22

's 2007 Bonus

|2007 Base Salary: |  | 
|----------------- |  | 
|                  |  | 
|2007 Variable:    |  | 
|                  |  | 

YTD (1/01/07 - 12/31/07) = 2007 EBITDA

| |  | EBITDA |  | @ |  |  |  | = 0% × factor  
| |  | ------ |  | - |  |  |  | ---------------
| |  | EBITDA |  | @ |  |  |  | = 100% × factor
| |  | EBITDA |  | @ |  |  |  | = 200% × factor

| |  | Note:
| |  | -----
| |  |     
| |  |     
| |  |     
| |  |     

---



QuickLinks
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ERNESTO FIGUEROA CHAVEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-50367

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-01083-SVW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2013** 

Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Ernesto Figueroa Chavez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and four-year sentence for conspiracy to

engage in the business of dealing in firearms without a license, in violation of 18

FILED

OCT 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-50367

U.S.C. §§ 371 and 3571(b)(3). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm the conviction but vacate and remand for resentencing. 

Figueroa Chavez contends that his plea was invalid because the district court

erred by allegedly failing to advise him of the full immigration consequences of his

plea, including a potential 20-year bar to reentry. This argument fails because the

district court has no obligation to make this advisement. See United States v.

Delgado-Ramos, 635 F.3d 1237, 1238, 1241 (9th Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (district

court does not have a duty “to inform a defendant of the immigration consequences

of his plea”). Contrary to Figueroa Chavez’s argument, nothing in Chaidez v.

United States, 133 S. Ct. 1103 (2013), undermines Delgado-Ramos.

Figueroa Chavez next contends that the district court committed procedural

error at sentencing when it failed to calculate the Guidelines range. We review for

plain error. See United States v. Waknine, 543 F.3d 546, 551 (9th Cir. 2008). The

district court’s failure to calculate the applicable Guidelines range constituted

“significant procedural error.” Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). 

Because the custodial sentence here was 21 months above the top of the advisory

Guidelines range calculated by the presentence report, we cannot conclude that the

court would have imposed the same sentence absent the error. Accordingly, we

vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing so that the district court’s analysis
3 11-50367

can proceed from “an initial determination of the correct Guidelines range.” 

United States v. Munoz-Camarena, 631 F.3d 1028, 1031 (9th Cir. 2011) (per

curiam); see also United States v. Hammons, 558 F.3d 1100, 1105-06 (9th Cir.

2009) (district court’s failure to calculate the correct Guidelines range was plain

error). 

In light of our decision, we do not reach Figueroa Chavez’s remaining

challenges to his sentence.

AFFIRMED in part; VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing.
Exhibit
99.2
 
 CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10K of Grosvenor
Explorations Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Felimon A.
Lee, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 E.
                  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and
 
 E.
                  The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 August
10, 2009             FELIMON A.
LEE
 Felimon A. Lee
 Chief
Executive Officer,
 President
and Director
 
 
 
 -1-
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3305 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 117
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3305

                          [Report No. 111-286]

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 224 South Boulder Avenue in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as the ``H. Dale Cook 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2009

  Mr. Sullivan (for himself, Mr. Lucas, Mr. Boren, Mr. Cole, and Ms. 
   Fallin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                            October 6, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 224 South Boulder Avenue in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as the ``H. Dale Cook 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 224 
South Boulder Avenue in Tulsa, Oklahoma, shall be known and designated 
as the ``H. Dale Cook Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``H. Dale Cook Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
                                                 House Calendar No. 117

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3305

                          [Report No. 111-286]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 224 South Boulder Avenue in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as the ``H. Dale Cook 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 6, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```