alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3553 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 579
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3553

                          [Report No. 111-299]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 22, 2010

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

                           September 22, 2010

               Reported by Mr. Dorgan, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To exclude from consideration as income under the Native American 
Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 amounts received 
by a family from the Department of Veterans Affairs for service-related 
                disabilities of a member of the family.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Indian Veterans Housing Opportunity 
Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM INCOME.

    Paragraph (9) of section 4 of the Native American Housing 
Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4103(9)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Any amounts received by any member of the 
                family as disability compensation under chapter 11 of 
                title 38, United States Code, or dependency and 
                indemnity compensation under chapter 13 of such 
                title.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 579

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3553

                          [Report No. 111-299]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To exclude from consideration as income under the Native American 
Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 amounts received 
by a family from the Department of Veterans Affairs for service-related 
                disabilities of a member of the family.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 22, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rajeev Kumar, Appellant.

[988 NYS2d 85]

Appeals having been

taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered on or about June 28, 2011, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur— Mazzarelli, J.E, Acosta, Freedman, Richter and Clark, JJ.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 352 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to assist in the planning, design, 

and construction of the Tumalo Irrigation District Water Conservation 

Project in Deschutes County, Oregon. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2009 

Mr. WALDEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to assist in the 

planning, design, and construction of the Tumalo Irrigation District Water Conservation Project in Deschutes 

County, Oregon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tumalo Water Con5 servation Project Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 352 IH

1 (1) DISTRICT.—The term ‘‘District’’ means the 

2 Tumalo Irrigation District, Oregon. 

3 (2) PROJECT.—The term ‘‘Project’’ means the 

4 Tumalo Irrigation District Water Conservation 

5 Project authorized under section 3(a). 

6 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

7 the Secretary of the Interior. 

8 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION TO PLAN, DESIGN AND CON9 STRUCT THE TUMALO WATER CONSERVA10 TION PROJECT. 

11 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in cooperation 

12 with the District— 

13 (1) may participate in the planning, design, and 

14 construction of the Tumalo Irrigation District Water 

15 Conservation Project in Deschutes County, Oregon; 

16 and 

17 (2) for purposes of planning and designing the 

18 Project, shall take into account any appropriate 

19 studies and reports prepared by the District. 

20 (b) COST-SHARING REQUIREMENT.— 

21 (1) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of 

22 the total cost of the Project shall be 25 percent, 

23 which shall be nonreimbursable to the United States. 

24 (2) CREDIT TOWARD NON-FEDERAL SHARE.— 

25 The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 352 IH

1 share of the Project any amounts that the District 

2 provides toward the design, planning, and construc3 tion before the date of the enactment of this Act. 

4 (c) TITLE.—The District shall hold title to any facili5 ties constructed under this Act. 

6 (d) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS.—The 

7 District shall pay the operation and maintenance costs of 

8 the Project. 

9 (e) EFFECT.—Any assistance provided under this Act 

10 shall not be considered to be a supplemental or additional 

11 benefit under Federal reclamation law (the Act of June 

12 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388, chapter 1093), and Acts supple13 mental to and amendatory of that Act (43 U.S.C. 371 et 

14 seq.). 

15 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

16 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Sec17 retary for the Federal share of the cost of the Project 

18 $4,000,000. 

19 SEC. 5. SUNSET. 

20 The authority of the Secretary to carry out this Act 

21 shall expire on the date that is 10 years after the date 

22 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Registrant

Name of Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of IncorporationVerigy (Canada) Inc.

CanadaVerigy Germany GmbH

GermanyVerigy Italia S.r.L.

ItalyVerigy (Japan) K.K.

JapanVerigy (Korea) Ltd.

South KoreaVerigy France SAS

FranceVerigy (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.

MalaysiaVerigy (Netherlands) B.V.

The NetherlandsVerigy (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.

SingaporeVerigy US, Inc.

DelawareVerigy (US) Development Inc.

DelawareInovys Corporation

CaliforniaVerigy (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.

People's Republic of ChinaVerigy (Israel) Ltd.

Israel


---



QuickLinks
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00259-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

John Francis Curran III, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CR-05-713701, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

By complaint filed in the City of Austin municipal court, the State charged

John Francis Curran III with violating a city ordinance that bans solicitation between pedestrians

and occupants of motor vehicles. Curran filed a motion to quash the complaint on grounds that,

among others, the ordinance violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; Article 1,

Section 8 of the Texas Constitution; and the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the

Fourteen Amendment. The municipal court granted the motion to quash and dismissed the cause,

holding that “the ordinance at issue is overly broad and not narrowly tailored and is therefore

unconstitutional.” The State appealed the judgment to the county court-at-law, which issued

an opinion and judgment affirming the municipal court’s judgment. The State appealed the

county court-at-law’s judgment to this Court.
2

After this Court set the appeal for oral argument, Curran filed an unopposed motion

for “leave to withdraw appellee’s motion to quash filed below and to dismiss this appeal.” Curran

represents that “the parties have reached an agreement in order to resolve the dispute now on

appeal.” He “requests leave to authorize him to withdraw his motion to quash filed in the municipal

court which ultimately led to this appeal and then requests this Court dismiss this appeal as moot.”

We grant Curran’s motion for “leave to withdraw appellee’s motion to quash filed

below” and abate this appeal to permit proceedings below to effectuate the parties’ agreement. The

parties shall advise the Court when the motion to quash is withdrawn. If the motion to quash is not

withdrawn by February 9, 2009, the parties shall file a status report with this Court. We overrule

Curran’s motion to dismiss at this time.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Abated

Filed: December 9, 2008

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934, AS AMENDED,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert Thele certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CoConnect, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Robert Thele

Robert Thele, Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)



May 22, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          62,402
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,644
<INVENTORY>                                     30,213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,034
<PP&E>                                         373,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                 130,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 553,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,330
<BONDS>                                        885,794
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (768,010)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   553,194
<SALES>                                        426,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               426,240
<CGS>                                          187,079
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  225,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,004
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (71,773)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       333
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (72,106)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  33,652
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,454)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED  JUNE  30,  2000,  FOR DIGS,  INC.  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                    1,412,283
<SECURITIES>                                 80,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                55,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,547,283
<PP&E>                                      270,528
<DEPRECIATION>                               67,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,987,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        59,216
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                      25
<COMMON>                                      6,659
<OTHER-SE>                                1,921,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              1,987,756
<SALES>                                     333,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            353,296
<CGS>                                        89,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               777,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              5,276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            5,276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (429,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  2,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (468,468)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0


</TABLE>
Wachovia
              Securities8739
              Research Drive, URP4Charlotte,
              NC 28288









WACHOVIA
      SECURITIES














**1123
      SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE**








Reference
      is hereby made to that certain Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement dated as of
      March 1, 2006, by and among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, INC., as
      Depositor, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland
      Loan
      Services, INC., as Special Servicer, and LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as
      Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
      2006-1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined
      shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.





Pursuant
      to Section 3.13 of this Agreement, Timothy Ryan and Marilyn Addison, Managing
      Director of Customer Relationship Management and Director of Compliance Third
      Party Oversight, do hereby certify that:





1.
            A
                review of the activities of the Master Servicer, during the period
                from
                March 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006, and of its performance under
                the
                Agreement during such period has been made under our supervision;
                and





2.
            To
                the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
                has
                fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
                respects throughout the period March 1, 2006, through December 31,
                2006;








IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the
      10 th day of
      March 2007.











/s/
      Timothy S. Ryan    /s/
      Marilyn
      Addison


Timothy
      S. Ryan, Managing Director     
Marilyn Addison, Director


Wachovia
      Bank National Association  Wachovia
      Bank
      National Association
#### In the Matter of Doran Zabari et al., Appellants, v New York City Loft Board et al., Respondents.

[666 NYS2d 598]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J.), entered on or about February 11, 1997, which denied petitioners’ application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent Loft Board’s determination of 1996 denying them rent protection under Multiple Dwelling Law article 7-C (the Loft Law), unanimously modified, on the law, to annul that part of the determination that petitioner Doran Zabari had waived any rent protection prior to September 29, 1993, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The proceeding is time-barred to the extent it challenges the Board’s prior order of abandonment, rendered September 29, 1993, the four-month statute of limitations (CPLR 217) having commenced to run, at the least, in May 1994, when petitioners actually learned of that prior order *(see, 90-92 Wadsworth Ave. Tenants Assn. v City of N. Y. Dept. of Hous. Preservation & Dev.,*227 AD2d 331). However, the proceeding is timely insofar as it challenges the Board’s determination that Doran Zabari had implicitly waived his rights to rent regulation prior to September 29, 1993, the effective date of the order of abandonment, and that determination was arbitrary and capricious, in view of Multiple Dwelling Law § 286 (12), permitting an owner to purchase an occupant’s rights under the Loft Law, and 29 RCNY 2-10 (b), requiring the owner to file a record of such sale with the Board. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jesus Molina, Appellant.

[665 NYS2d 865]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered on or about August 9, 1994, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonirivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the *41Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rubin, Tom, Mazzarelli and Colabella, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 13, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), ASTM International (“ASTM”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of current, ongoing ASTM standards activities originating between May 2017 and September 2017 designated as Work Items. A complete listing of ASTM Work Items along with a brief description of each, is available at                     *http://www.astm.org*.                

                    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                           ( print page 49425)    **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 15, 2017. A notice was filed in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 28, 2017 (82 FR 29328).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2017-23151 Filed 10-24-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P