alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         432,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  904,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,575,336
<PP&E>                                         407,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,170,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,685,437
<BONDS>                                         43,521
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        200
<COMMON>                                           364
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,559,291)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,170,231
<SALES>                                      3,085,204
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,085,204
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,828,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,439,532
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,284,660)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,284,660)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,284,660)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.68)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, John Zongyang Li, Co- Chief Executive Officer of Sun New Media, Inc., certify that1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sun New Media, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e)and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report was being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting./s/John Zongyang Li
TALEEN A. ASHBY and JOHN W. ASHBY

, Appellant s ,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS O F SOUNDVIEW HOME LOAN TRUST 2007

- OPT4, ASSET

BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007

- OPT4

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 10 46

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 6, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County

. Adrian G. Soud , Judge

. Lynn Drysdale, Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, Inc., Jacksonville , f or Appellant s

.
Monika E. Siwiec, Michael Eisenband, Nicole R. Topper , and David Ehrlich of Blank Rome, LLP, Boca Raton , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

A FFIRMED

. See Bolous v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n , 41 Fla. L. Weekly D2448

(Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 2, 2016); Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co. v. Marciano , 190 So.

3d 166 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

OSTERHAUS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
A. BROWN 

REME CO 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

NEELKANTH HOSPITALITY, LLC, AN 

OREGON LIMITED LIABILITY 

COMPANY, 

Appellant, 

VS. 

MOMENI CONSTRUCTION, INC., A 

NEVADA CORPORATION, 

Respondent. 

No. 83989 

FiL 

MAY 2 b 2022 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This court previously ordered appellant to show cause why this 

appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The parties have 

now filed a stipulation to disrniss this appeal. Cause appearing, this appeal 

is dismissed. NRAP 42(b). 

It is so ORDERED. 

cc: Hon. Christy L. Craig, District Judge 

Lansford W. Levitt, Settlement Judge 

The Faux Law Group 

Holland & Hart LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(01 I947A -2.Z.-)685
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3213 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand and make permanent 

the standard deduction for real property taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2009 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

and make permanent the standard deduction for real 

property taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Complete and Perma5 nent Property Tax Deduction Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STANDARD DEDUCTION FOR REAL PROPERTY 

7 TAXES EXPANDED AND MADE PERMANENT. 

8 (a) STANDARD DEDUCTION FOR REAL PROPERTY

9 TAXES MADE PERMANENT.—Subparagraph (C) of section 

10 63(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3213 IH

1 by striking ‘‘in the case of any taxable year beginning in 

2 2008 or 2009,’’. 

3 (b) REPEAL OF DOLLAR LIMITATION AND EXCLU4 SION OF FOREIGN TAXES.—Paragraph (7) of section 

5 63(c) of such Code is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(7) REAL PROPERTY TAX DEDUCTION.—For 

7 purposes of paragraph (1), the real property tax de8 duction is the amount allowable as a deduction 

9 under section 164(a)(1) (determined without regard 

10 to any taxes taken into account under section 

11 62(a)).’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

14 December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            7674
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1774
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      78644
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           11232
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             11361
<LOANS>                                         473253
<ALLOWANCE>                                       7159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  597157
<DEPOSITS>                                      387968
<SHORT-TERM>                                     53735
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               4543
<LONG-TERM>                                      21869
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         81166
<OTHER-SE>                                       47876
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  597157
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  19381
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 3303
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 22684
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                9358
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               11214
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            11470
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      675
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 218
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   8549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3602
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        3602
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2534
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.07
<LOANS-NON>                                        293
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  6484
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        4
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 7159
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              7159
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### TYEHIMBA ADEYEMI *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 33020)

DiPentima, C. J., and Robinson and Alvord, Js.

Submitted on briefs October 28

officially released November 15, 2011

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



         I, Ethan D. Hokit,  Chief  Financial  Officer of Military Resale Group,
Inc. (the "Registrant"),  do hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge,  based upon a review of the  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly  period ended September 30, 2003 of the Registrant,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.



                                        By: /s/ Ethan D. Hokit
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Name: Ethan D. Hokit
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer

November 25, 2003

---------------------

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Military Resale Group,  Inc. and will be retained by Military Resale
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




                                       25
Exhibit
      ___





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**








I,
      Gary
      Herman, certify that:





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Creative Development Corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 (the
      "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                July 11, 2007/s/ Gary
              HermanGary
                Herman
              Chief
                Executive Officer
Exhibit 23

             Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Cascade Financial Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 33-94456) dated July 10, 1995 on Form S-8 and in the registration
statements (No. 333-32272 and No. 333-97929) on Form S-8 of Cascade Financial
Corporation of our report dated February 28, 2005 relating to the consolidated
balance sheet of Cascade Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year
ended December 31, 2004, which report is incorporated by reference into Cascade
Financial Corporation's 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K from Cascade Financial
Corporation's 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders.


/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Everett, Washington
March 10, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2013

p1118 

# Order

Clerk November 25, 2013

147671

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147671

COA: 298302

Wayne CC: 09

- 025646

- FH

ERIC ARLINGTON OGILVIE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 23, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 202 (Friday, October 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22786]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--GEPS 9 Contracts

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add Global Expedited Package Services 9 
to the Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice: October 20, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-
7820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642, on October 13, 
2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of The 
United States Postal Service to add Global Expedited Package Services 9 
to the Competitive Products List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-6 and CP2018-11.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-22786 Filed 10-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EX-35 (b)
(logo) OCWEN


ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

March 8, 2007

RE: ACE 2006 SL1

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen Loan
Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance statement
pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance with the
servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set forth in
Regulation AB, 17 CFR Section 229.1100, et seq., ("Regulation AB"). In this
regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief in all material respects.

1.   A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period,
     and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated
     January 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my supervision.

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all of
     its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
     Reporting Period.

By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name:  Ronald M. Faris
Title: President


Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
1661 Worthington Road Suite 100
Centrepark West
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 13, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-407

Lower Tribunal No. F11-33207

________________

Dorian Hinkson,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge.

Dorian Hinkson, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 21   


                        Subsidiaries of
                   KAHLER REALTY CORPORATION
                  Year Ended December 31, 1995


Name of Subsidiary                                       State of 
                                                      Incorporation
Kahler Management Corporation                            Minnesota
The Kahler Corporation                                   Minnesota
Kahler of Arizona                                        Minnesota
Anderson's Formal Wear, Inc.                             Minnesota
Anderson's Formal Wear of Colorado, Inc.                 Minnesota
Anderson's Formal Wear of Texas, Inc.                    Minnesota
Anderson's Formal Wear of Kansas, Inc.                   Minnesota
Kahler Real Estate Management Corporation                Minnesota
Lawler's Inc                                             Minnesota
Lakeview of Rochester, Inc.                              Minnesota
Kahler Monongalia Venture, Inc.                          Minnesota
Kahler of West Virginia, Inc.                            Minnesota
Ten Acres S Corporation                                West Virginia
Albert Lea Inn Towne Motel, Inc.                         Minnesota
Textile Care Services, Inc.                               Utah
S.L.K. Management Inc.                                    Utah
S.L.K. Inc.                                               Utah
Kahler Development Corporation                           Minnesota
Olmsted Development, Inc.                              West Virginia
Ogden Park Hotel Corporation, Inc.                        Utah
Boise Park Hotel Corporation                              Idaho
Provo of Rochester, Inc.                                  Utah
Kahler Pocatello, Inc.                                    Idaho
Kahler Twin Falls, Inc.                                   Idaho
Kahler of Montana, Inc.                                  Montana
#### RAMBO ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. SOUTH TAMA COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee.

No. 06-1695.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 14, 2007.

Filed: Jan. 11, 2008.

Kirk S. Blecha, argued, Omaha, NE, Lindsay K. Lundhom, on the brief, Omaha, NE, for appellant.

Randall H. Stefani, argued, Des Moines, IA, Danielle J. Haindfield, on the brief, Des Moines, IA, for appellee.

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action in contract and quasi-contract for services that an architectural and consulting firm rendered to a school district. After a bench trial, the district court entered judgment for Rambo on its contract claim and denied recovery on the quasi-contract claim. In an earlier opinion, *Rambo Assoc., Inc. v. South Tama County Community Sch. Dist.,*487 F.3d 1178 (8th Cir.2007), we affirmed the district court’s judgment on the contract claim but remanded for further findings on the quasi-contract claim. We directed the district court to determine, if it could, what “extra services” Rambo rendered outside the written contract at South Tama’s request, to determine the reasonable value of those services, and to give judgment to *999Rambo in that amount. *Id.*at 1189. We have now received the district court’s further findings and legal conclusions.

The district court, after receiving the parties’ briefs and diligently searching the record, rendered a detailed and thorough opinion in which it held that Rambo was not entitled to recover because the court could not determine with any reasonable certainty what “extra services” Rambo rendered or what their reasonable value was. *See Quade v. Heiderscheit,*391 N.W.2d 261, 264 (Iowa Ct.App.1986). We conclude, after our examination of the record, that the district court correctly identified the governing legal principles, made no clearly erroneous factual findings, and did not err in applying the legal principles to the facts.

We therefore affirm the judgment.