alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Wesley VAUGHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glenn S. GOORD, Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services; James A. Nichols, Deputy Superintendent of Programs (Mid-State); Robert *101Prosser, Maintenance Supervisor (Mid-State); Daniel Abbis, Vocational Supervisor (Mid-State); Wilfredo Batista, First Deputy Superintendent (Mid-State); Donald Selsky, Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Defendants-Appellees.*

No. 10-1077-pr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 3, 2011.

Wesley Vaughn, Dannemora, NY, pro se.

Owen Demuth, Assistant Solicitor General, Nancy A. Spiegel, Senior Assistant Solicitor General, for Barbara D. Underwood, New York State Office of the Attorney General, Albany, NY, for Appellees.

PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge, JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.**

*

 The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the official caption as set forth above.

**

 The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Wesley Vaughn appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Strom, J.), granting defendants-appellees summary judgment on his claim that he was denied due process at a prison disciplinary hearing. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.

“We review orders granting summary judgment *de novo*and determine whether the district court properly concluded that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” *Davis v. New York,*316 F.3d 93, 99-100 (2d Cir. 2002). “[Rjeliance upon conclusory statements or mere allegations is not sufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion.” *Id.*at 100.

For substantially the reasons stated by the district court, we affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees on Vaughn’s due process claim. *Vaughn v. Nichols,*No. 9:02-CV-1512, 2010 WL 681409, at *3-*6 (N.D.N.Y. Feb.24, 2010). “Although prison inmates necessarily have their liberty severely curtailed while incarcerated, they are nevertheless entitled to certain procedural protections when disciplinary actions subject them to further liberty deprivations----” *Sira v. Morton,*380 F.3d 57, 69 (2d Cir.2004). Here, resolving all ambiguities and drawing all factual inferences in Vaughn’s favor, *Davis,*316 F.3d at 100, we conclude that Vaughn’s allegations do not rise to the level of a due process violation.

Finding no merit in Vaughn’s remaining arguments, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
#### Alonzo A. BALDWIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael McCALL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 11-6176.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 31, 2011.

Decided: April 6, 2011.

*299Alonzo A. Baldwin, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alonzo A. Baldwin seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition and the court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp.2010). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Baldwin that failure to file timely and specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46(4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Baldwin has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                  11,165
<SECURITIES>                                       290                  13,485
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,835                  11,135
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,651                  35,989
<PP&E>                                         311,940                 229,357
<DEPRECIATION>                                 110,340                  68,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,087                 225,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,938                  26,524
<BONDS>                                         37,958                 107,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,087                 225,358
<SALES>                                        107,199                  42,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,380                  43,344
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,687                  28,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,267                   7,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                   1,822
<CHANGES>                                          953                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,473                   5,722
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Robert Demison, III, * From the 91st District Court

of Eastland County,

Trial Court No. 23623.

Vs. No. 11-18-00048-CR * November 15, 2018

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Wright, S.C.J., siting by assignment;

and Judge Satterwhite, sitting by

assignment)

(Bailey, C.J., and Willson, J., not 

participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April

26, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00638-CV

IN RE FREDERICK GENE TAYLOR, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

328th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-DCV-273004

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 8, 2021, relator Frederick Gene Taylor filed a petition for writ 

of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Walter 

G. Armatys, presiding judge of the 328th District Court of Fort Bend County, to 

vacate the trial court’s November 4, 2021 order on motion to strike and limit 

testimony and evidence.
2

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We further order 

the stay issued by this Court on November 8, 2021, lifted.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23033]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XF781


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (MAFMC's) Summer 
Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Monitoring Committee will hold a 
public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, November 13, 2017, from 1 
p.m. to 5 p.m. and on Tuesday, November 14, 2017, from 8:30 a.m. to 3 
p.m. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for agenda details.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hilton Garden Inn BWI 
Airport, 1516 Aero Drive, Linthicum, MD 21090; telephone: (410) 691-
0500.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
Web site: www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management 
Council's Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Monitoring 
Committee will meet November 13-14 to develop recommendations for 
recreational management measures for the 2018 summer flounder, scup, 
and black sea bass fisheries. The Committee may also discuss ongoing 
options for improvements to the recreational management measures 
process and ongoing analyses related to recreational fishery issues for 
these three species.
    A detailed agenda and background documents will be made available 
on the Council's Web site (www.mafmc.org) prior to the meeting.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aid should be directed to M. Jan Saunders, (302) 526-5251, at 
least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: October 19, 2017.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-23033 Filed 10-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheet of MidAmerican  Energy Company as of March 31, 1996,
and the related  consolidated  statements of income and cash flows for the three
months  ended March 31,  1996,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                         0000928576
<NAME>                        MidAmerican Energy Company
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2,636,139
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    395,412
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         254,371
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       404,908
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 210,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,901,481
<COMMON>                                       797,675
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            451,414
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 1,244,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          50,000
<PREFERRED>                                    81,461
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           1,109,563
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 99,800
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  917
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,315,490
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  3,901,481
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      458,260
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           32,330
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     356,569
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     388,899
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        69,361
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             5,876<F1>
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 75,237
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       21,713
<NET-INCOME>                                   53,524
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    2,477
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  51,047
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       30,221
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      19,826
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         157,635
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Tag 41  includes a  $6,105,000  income from  Discontinued  Operations,  net of
income taxes.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,892,724
<SECURITIES>                                 5,187,855
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      34,801,050
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,013,588)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,086,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          486,805
<BONDS>                                     19,290,947
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,338
<COMMON>                                        13,881
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,514,253
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,086,466
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,896,557
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,063,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,563,383
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,556,624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (482,272)
<CHANGES>                                     (35,565)
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,386,590)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5

<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                              10,150
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    34,921
<PP&E>                                                              96,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      47,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     442,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            1,452,793
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                            17,212
<OTHER-SE>                                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       442,169
<SALES>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         0
<CGS>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   265,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  18,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   (283,964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               (283,964)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      (283,964)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        (0.02)


</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 15, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00648

- CV

Debra Porter , Appellant

v.

Gale Miller Barnes ; Sheri Miller ; Renee Hawkins ; Marcus Hawkins ;

Alyce Hilton Johnson ; Clyde Hilton ; Demotrios Hilton ; Howard Phearse ;

Keino Remi Phearse ; Kay Phears e ; Al Gene Hogg ; Donny Hogg ; Joslyn Hogg ;

Roslyn Hogg ; Lonnie Houston ; Jamar Houston ; Tavares Houston ;

Winifred Thorns Gilden ; Andra Blake ; James Thorns ; Murray Lee Thorns ;

Abner Thorns ; Nathaniel Thorns ; Jos eph Thorns ; Joy Fay Janie Thorns ; Wi llis A. Bold en ;

Unknown Heirs of Charlotte Houston, deceased; Unknown Heirs of Jessie Thorns,

deceased ; Unknown Heirs of Charlie Thorns, deceased ; Unknown Heirs of

Susan McDowell, deceased ; and Curtis Capps, A ppellees

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUS TICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

Having reviewed the r ecord , the Court holds that Debra Porter has not prosecuted her appeal and

did not comply with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismisses the

appeal for want of prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this ap peal, both in

this Court and in the court below.
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3250 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1210 West Main Street in Riverhead, New 

York, as the ‘‘Private First Class Garfield M. Langhorn 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3250 EH

1 SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS GARFIELD M. 

2 LANGHORN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1210 West Main Street in 

5 Riverhead, New York, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Private First Class Garfield M. Langhorn Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Private First Class 

12 Garfield M. Langhorn Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 21, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3250 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Posting’’. Class Garfield M. Langhorn Post Office Build- Riverhead, New York, as the ‘‘Private First al Service located at 1210 West Main Street in
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the amendment to the Quarterly Report of R&G
Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q1A for the six month period
ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the undersigned's best knowledge and belief:

         (a)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated this 16th day of August, 2002.

                              R&G Financial Corporation


                              /s/ Victor J. Galan
                              ------------------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer

                              /s/ Joseph R. Sandoval
                              ------------------------------
                              Chief Financial Officer


                                       31