48848 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 202 / Friday, October 20, 2017 / Notices 

Federal Register (81 FR 91169), and 

ended on March 15, 2017. The BLM also 

published a NOA in the Federal 

Register (81 FR 90865) for the Draft 

RMP Amendment/Draft EIS. To allow 

the public an opportunity to review the 

Draft EIS, the BLM conducted five 

public meetings in January and 

February of 2017 at the following 

locations: BLM National Training 

Center, Phoenix; Arizona Game and 

Fish Department, Phoenix, Casa Grande, 

and Maricopa City; and Burton Barr 

Library, Phoenix. During the comment 

period, the BLM received 437 unique 

submittals containing 121 substantive 

comments from Federal, State, and local 

agencies; public and private 

organizations; and individuals. 

Following the public comment period 

on the Draft RMP Amendment/Draft 

EIS, comments were used to inform the 

proposed RMP Amendment and Final 

EIS. Public comments resulted in the 

addition of clarifying text, but did not 

significantly change proposed land use 

plan amendment decisions. The BLM 

responded to substantive comments and 

made appropriate revisions to the 

document, or explained why a comment 

did not warrant a change. 

The Proposed RMP Amendment/Final 

EIS evaluates five alternatives in detail, 

including the No Action Alternative 

(Alternative A) and four action 

alternatives (Alternatives B, C, D, and 

E). Alternative A, the No Action 

Alternative, provides that recreational 

target shooting on the SDNM will 

continue to be managed in accordance 

with land use planning guidance of the 

Lower Gila South Resource Management 

Plan of 1988, which did not include any 

management restrictions on recreational 

target shooting. Thus, the entire SDNM 

would be available for recreational 

target shooting. Under Alternative B, an 

area temporarily restricted from 

recreational target shooting, by order of 

the U.S. District Court, District of 

Arizona (approximately 10,599 acres or 

2.1 percent of the SDNM) would be 

permanently unavailable to recreational 

target shooting. The Final EIS identifies 

Alternative C as the BLM Proposed RMP 

Amendment. Alternative C would make 

recreational target shooting available in 

the Desert Back Country Recreational 

Management Zone only, resulting in 

approximately 53,300 acres, or 11 

percent of the SDNM, unavailable for 

this activity. Alternative C would 

protect the monument’s resources, 

objects, and values as well as the public 

health. Under Alternative D, 

recreational target shooting would be 

available only outside of designated 

wilderness areas, land managed for 

wilderness characteristics, and the Juan 

Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail 

Recreation Management Zone, resulting 

in approximately 320,317 acres, or 66 

percent of the SDNM, unavailable for 

this activity. Under Alternative E, the 

entire SDNM would be unavailable for 

recreational target shooting. 

Additionally, Alternative C is consistent 

with Department of the Interior 

Secretarial Order (SO) 3356 titled, 

‘‘Hunting, Fishing, Recreational 

Shooting, and Wildlife Conservation 

Opportunities and Coordination with 

States, Tribes, and Territories.’’ Within 

SO 3356, several sections speak to 

expanding or providing opportunities 

for ‘‘recreational shooting.’’ For 

example, Sec 4b.(1) speaks to amending 

‘‘National Monument Management 

Plans to include or expand hunting, 

recreational shooting, and fishing 

opportunities to the extent practicable 

under the law.’’ Whereas, Sec 4b.(6) 

requires Departmental Bureaus to 

‘‘incorporate analysis of the impacts of 

Federal land and water management 

actions on hunting, fishing, and 

recreational shooting access in planning 

and decisionmaking.’’ Although 

unstated in SO 3356, inherent therein is 

that public safety is paramount under 

actions taken to fulfill the Order. 

Further, responsible use of our public 

lands is necessary by all users for the 

continued enjoyment of these lands by 

the American people. 

The BLM will issue a Record of 

Decision for this planning effort after 

the 30-day protest period, the 60-day 

Governor’s Consistency Review, and 

after any protest resolution. 

Instructions for filing a protest with 

the BLM Director regarding the 

Proposed RMP/Final EIS may be found 

in the ‘‘Dear Reader’’ Letter of the 

proposed RMP Amendment/Final EIS 

for Recreational Target Shooting in the 

SDNM and at 43 CFR 1610.5–2. All 

protests must be in writing and mailed 

to the appropriate address, see the 

ADDRESSES section above. Emailed 

protests will not be accepted as valid 

protests unless the protesting party also 

provides the original letter by either 

regular or overnight mail postmarked by 

the close of the protest period. Under 

these conditions, the BLM will consider 

the emailed protest as an advance copy 

and it will receive full consideration. If 

you wish to provide the BLM with such 

advance notification, please direct 

emails to protest@blm.gov. 

Before including your phone number, 

email address, or other personal 

identifying information in your protest, 

you should be aware that your entire 

protest—including your personal 

identifying information—may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask us in your protest to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 

1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2, 43 CFR 1610.5. 

Edward J. Kender, 

Field Manager, Lower Sonoran Field Office. 

[FR Doc. 2017–22598 Filed 10–19–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–32–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Federal Bureau of Investigation 

[OMB Number 1110–0015] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection; 

eComments Requested: Hate Crime 

Incident Report 

AGENCY: Federal Bureau of 

Investigation, Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Federal Bureau of Investigation, 

Criminal Justice Information Services 

Division will be submitting the 

following information collection request 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. This proposed 

information collection was previously 

published in the Federal Register on 

August 16, 2017 allowing for a 60 day 

comment period. 

DATES: Comments are encourages and 

will be accepted for an additional 30 

day until November 20, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to Mrs. Amy Blasher, 

Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of 

Investigation, CJIS Division, Module E– 

3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, 

West Virginia 26306; facsimile (304) 

625–3566. Written comments and/or 

suggestions can also be sent to the 

Office of Management and Budget, 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Attention Department of Justice 

Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or 

sent to OIRA_submissions@

omb.eop.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMAITON: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 


srobinson on DSKBC5CHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 202 / Friday, October 20, 2017 / Notices 48849 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: Hate 

Crime Incident Report 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

Agency form number: 1–700. 

Sponsoring component: Department of 

Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 

Criminal Justice Information Services 

Division. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: City, county, state, 

federal, and tribal law enforcement 

agencies. Abstract: Under Title 28, U.S. 

Code, Section 534, this information 

collection requests hate crime data from 

respondents in order for the FBI UCR 

Program to serve as the national 

clearinghouse for the collection and 

dissemination of hate crime data and to 

publish these statistics in ‘‘Hate Crime 

Statistics’’. This provides for the 

national UCR Program a record of each 

crime incident including the offense 

classification and its respective bias 

motivation, the number and type of 

victims, the location of the incident, the 

number of suspected offenders, the 

suspected offenders, the suspected 

offender’s race, and whether the victims 

and offenders are under 18 or over the 

age of 18. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond/reply: There are approximately 

10,106 law enforcement agency 

respondents that submit monthly for a 

total of 121,272 responses with an 

estimated response time of 7 minutes 

per response. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: There are an estimated 4,716 

hours, annual burden, associated with 

this information collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Melody Braswell, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE., Suite 3E.405B, 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: October 16, 2017. 

Melody Braswell, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2017–22715 Filed 10–19–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1122–NEW] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Approval of a 

New Collection 

AGENCY: Office on Violence Against 

Women, Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice, 

Office on Violence Against Women 

(OVW) will be submitting the following 

information collection request to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed 

information collection was previously 

published in the Federal Register at 82 

Federal Register 37901 on August 14, 

2017, allowing for a 60 day comment 

period. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 30 days until 

November 20, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Written comments and/or suggestion 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to Cathy Poston, 

Office on Violence Against Women, at 

202–514–5430 or Catherine.poston@

usdoj.gov. Written comments and/or 

suggestions can also be sent to the 

Office of Management and Budget, 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Attention Department of Justice 

Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20530 or 

sent to OIRA_submissions@

omb.eop.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Approval of a new collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: Semiannual progress report for the Grants to 

Tribal Governments to Exercise Special 

Domestic Violence Criminal Jurisdiction 

Program (Tribal Jurisdiction Program). 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Form Number: 1122–XXXX. 

U.S. Department of Justice, Office on 

Violence Against Women. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: The affected public includes 

the estimated 20 grantees under the 

Tribal Jurisdiction Program, a new grant 

program authorized in the Violence 

Against Women reauthorization Act of 

2013. The Tribal Jurisdiction Program is 

designed to assist Indian tribes in 

exercising special domestic violence 

criminal jurisdiction (SDVCJ). Through 

this grant program, Indian tribes will 

receive support and technical assistance 

for planning, developing and 

implementing changes in their criminal 

justice systems necessary to exercise 

SDVCJ. The program encourages 

collaborations among tribal leadership, 

tribal courts, tribal prosecutors, tribal 

attorneys, tribal defenders, law 


srobinson on DSKBC5CHB2PROD with NOTICES