alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
14.1




GROSVENOR
EXPLORATIONS INC.





CODE
OF ETHICS





FOR
CHIEF EXECUTIVE, FINANCIAL AND OTHER OFFICERS





Grosvenor
Explorations Inc. (the “Company”) is seeking to establish ethical conduct in its
financial management and reporting.  As a Company that hopes to
eventually seek a quotation on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, it is
essential that the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
are accurate, complete and understandable.  Senior financial officers
hold an important and elevated role in this process.  This Code
applies to:





(i)           the
Chief Executive Officer, the President, the Chief Financial Officers, Chief
Accounting Officer and the Secretary Treasurer of the Company, and





(ii)          any
other persons that may be designated by the Board of Directors (each, a “Senior
Officer”.)





Each
Senior Officer shall:





1.           Act
with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest in
personal and professional relationships.





2.           Provide
the Board of Directors with information that is accurate, complete, objective,
relevant, timely and understandable.





3.           Comply
with laws, rules and regulations of federal, state and local governments and
regulatory agencies.





4.           Act
in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence, without
misrepresenting material facts or allowing hi or her independent judgment to be
subordinated.





5.           Respect
the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of his or her work at
the Company except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to
disclose.  Confidential information acquired in the course of his or
her work will not be used for personal advantage.





6.           Share
knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to the Company’s
needs.





7.           Proactively
promote ethical behavior within the Company.





8.           Promote
responsible use of and control over all Company assets and
resources.





9.           Disclose
information required to be included in periodic reports filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission or required to be provided to any other
government entity full and fairly and in an understandable manner.





Violations
of this Code of Ethics may subject a Senior Officer to disciplinary action,
ranging from a reprimand to dismissal and possible criminal
prosecution.





Each
Senior Officer shall certify each year that such Officer has not violated this
Code and is not aware of any violations of the Code that have not been reported
to the Board of Directors.





This Code
may be amended, modified or waived by the Board of Directors, subject to the
disclosure and other provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
rules thereunder.
TYRONE L. SMITH,

Petitioner,

v.

DIANE ANDREWS, UNION 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4352

Opinion filed March 16, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Tyrone L. Smith, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Randall L. Page, Jr., Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

RAY, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Opinion issued December 5, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas

NO. 01-13-00751-CR

____________

CHRISTOPHER DAIDE LEVERON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1360798

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Counsel for appellant, Christopher Daide Leveron, has filed a motion to 

dismiss the appeal. The motion attaches a letter signed by appellant indicating he 

no longer wishes to pursue this appeal, which we find in compliance with Texas 
2

Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We have not 

issued a decision in the appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss 

any pending motions as moot.

We direct the Clerk to issue the mandate within 10 days of the date of this 

opinion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Secretary

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Lucy Cunningham, Director, Office of Executive Resources, Room N2453, U.S. Department of Labor, Frances Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20210, telephone: (202) 693-6624.

Signed at Washington, DC, on October 5, 2017.

R. Alexander Acosta,

Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 2017-22614 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4510-04-P
EX-23.2

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of AMCON Distributing Company on Form S-8 of our report dated
November 22, 2000, except for paragraph one of Note 1 and paragraph ten of
Note 2, for which the date is March 23, 2001, relating to the financial
statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.  We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated November 22, 2000 relating to
the financial statement schedule which appears in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
December 23, 2002
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bobby Ware, Appellant.

[665 NYS2d 869]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J.), rendered March 20, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and three counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly declined to require the prosecutor to provide race-neutral explanations for his use of peremptory challenges, because defendant failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. The mere number of peremptory challenges exercised by the prosecution against African-Americans *86did not establish a prima facie case (see, *People v Jenkins,*84 NY2d 1001), particularly where, as here, Caucasians constituted but a small proportion of the entire pool of prospective jurors. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Exhibit
32.2






CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





REQUIRED
BY RULE 13A - 14(B) OR RULE 15D - 14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. 1350







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgetech Services Inc.





On Form
10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and





Exchange
 Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bob Bates, CFO
of  the  Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
that:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.








Date:
      June 15, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Bob BatesBob
      BatesCFO
#### Fatumata B., as Mother and Natural Guardian of Ansumana B., an Infant, Appellant, v Pioneer Transportation Corp. et al., Defendants, and Jorge A. Soto, Respondent.

[988 NYS2d 31]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered April 15, 2013, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant Jorge A. Soto’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Soto and other witnesses testified that the infant plaintiff ran into the path of Soto’s car from between two parked school buses. Although Soto did not expressly plead the applicability of the emergency doctrine as an affirmative defense, he did plead, as parts of his affirmative defenses, that the accident was solely the result of the infant plaintiffs negligence in “walking into the path” of his vehicle “at a place other than a crosswalk.” Accordingly, the motion court “providently exercised its discretion in determining that it could consider the emergency doctrine affirmative defense” *(Mendez v City of New York,*110 AD3d 421, 421 [1st Dept 2013]).

By producing evidence that he was not speeding and was driving only about 15 miles per hour, that none of the parked school buses had their flashing lights on, and that the infant plaintiff darted out from between two parked school buses into the path of his car, Soto established his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Ramirez v Molina,*114 AD3d 540 [1st Dept 2014]; *Brown v Muniz,*61 AD3d 526, 527 [1st Dept 2009], *lv denied*13 NY3d 715 [2010]).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The infant plaintiff’s testimony that he walked, rather than ran, into the street, does not avail him, as he also testified, consistent with the other witnesses’ accounts, that Soto did not have any opportunity to stop, that he proceeded out from between two buses, and that he did not see the car before it hit him.

Furthermore, no issues of fact exist as to whether Soto’s low *487speed of 15 miles per hour was excessive. It is undisputed that the parked school buses did not have any flashing lights on, and there is no evidence indicating that children were actively entering or exiting the buses. A driver in an area where children are present “need not exercise extreme care or caution, although [he or] she must exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise under the circumstances” *(DeJesus v Alba,*63 AD3d 460, 463 [1st Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks omitted], *affd,*14 NY3d 860 [2010]). In this regard, the comment of one of the witnesses, a school bus driver, that she thought Soto was driving “a little fast” does not suffice to raise an issue of fact that he was driving at an unreasonably high rate of speed *(see Vega v MTA Bus Co.,*96 AD3d 506, 507 [1st Dept 2012]; *Murchison v Incognoli,*5 AD3d 271 [1st Dept 2004]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Renwick, Gische and Clark, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 16, 2020

Order 

Clerk

November 16, 2020

162224(48)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 162224

v COA: 348119

Macomb CC: 2018-000269-FC

CEDRICK DEANDRE CARR, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to waive the filing 

fees is GRANTED as to this case only.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

BODYMEDIA, INC., Appellant

v.

BASIS SCIENCE, INC., Appellee

______________________

2015

- 1786

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trad emark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,371.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

D AVID C LAY H OLLOWAY , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by R ENAE W AINWRIGHT

, R OBERT J. C URYLO

, M ICHAEL S. P AVENTO

.

J. D AVID H ADDEN , Fenwick & West, LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by
C AROLYN C HANG

, A MY H AYDEN

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (O’M ALLEY

, L INN

, and S TOLL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

July 12, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3357 Received in Senate (RDS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3357

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2009

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To restore sums to the Highway Trust Fund and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDING OF THE HIGHWAY TRUST FUND.

    Subsection (f) of section 9503 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to determination of trust fund balances after September 30, 
1998) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (2); and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Increase in fund balance.--Out of money in the 
        Treasury not otherwise appropriated, there is hereby 
        appropriated (without fiscal year limitation) to the Highway 
        Trust Fund $7,000,000,000.''.

SEC. 2. ADVANCES TO THE UNEMPLOYMENT TRUST FUND AND OTHER FUNDS.

    The item relating to ``Department of Labor--Employment and Training 
Administration--Advances to the Unemployment Trust Fund and Other 
Funds'' in title I of division F of the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 
2009 (Public Law 111-8; 123 Stat. 754) is amended by striking ``to 
remain available through September 30, 2010'' and all that follows 
(before the heading for the following item) and inserting ``such sums 
as may be necessary''.

SEC. 3. FHA MORTGAGE INSURANCE COMMITMENT AUTHORITY.

    The item relating to ``Federal Housing Administration--Mutual 
Mortgage Insurance Program Account'' in title II of division I of the 
Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-8; 123 Stat. 966) is 
amended by striking ``$315,000,000,000'' and inserting 
``$400,000,000,000''.

SEC. 4. GNMA MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES GUARANTEE COMMITMENT AUTHORITY.

    The item relating to ``Government National Mortgage Association--
Guarantees of Mortgage-Backed Securities Loan Guarantee Program 
Account'' in title II of division I of the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 
2009 (Public Law 111-8; 123 Stat. 967) is amended by striking 
``$300,000,000,000'' and inserting ``$400,000,000,000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00392-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-006170-1

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MICHELLE FEENEY, Appellant

V.

AGAVE ASSETS LLC AND JOJOBA ASSETS LLC, Appellees
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On April 13, 2022, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the 

appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss 

the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the 

court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the 

brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an 

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: May 19, 2022
Director Compensation Summary Sheet



 Exhibit 10.15 
 SUMMARY OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM 
 On December 14, 2006, the Board of Directors (the
“Board”) of Idearc Inc. (the “Company”) approved a compensation program for non-management directors. 
 Pursuant to the
director compensation program, each non-management director (other than the chairman of the Board and the chairs of the Board’s Audit Committee and Human Resources Committee) will receive a target annual pay package of $150,000, of which
approximately $60,000 will be paid in cash and $90,000 paid in the form of equity. Donald B. Reed, chair of the Human Resources Committee, will receive a target annual pay package of $160,000, of which approximately $70,000 will be paid in cash and
$90,000 paid in the form equity. Paul E. Weaver, chair of the Audit Committee will receive a target annual pay package of $165,000, of which approximately $75,000 will be paid in cash and $90,000 paid in the form of equity. John J. Mueller, who
serves as chairman of the Board and chair of the Board’s Nominating and Governance Committee, will receive a target annual pay package of $220,000, of which approximately $130,000 will be paid in cash and $90,000 paid in the form of equity.

 All payments to directors under the compensation program will be paid on a quarterly basis. 
 As an initial inducement to serve on the Board, each member of the Board will receive a one-time equity award with a value of $170,000. This one-time
equity award will be reduced to a value of $85,000 for directors who join the Board after December 31, 2006. 
 All equity awards under
the compensation program will be made in the form of restricted stock, unless the administrator of the stock plan requires unrestricted stock to allow for withholding taxes on the vesting date, or to simplify accrual of dividends. Restrictions on
one-time equity awards will lapse after three years, and dividends will be accrued and paid on the vesting date. Restrictions on annual equity awards will lapse after one year, and dividends will be paid as earned. 
 Directors will also receive reimbursement for travel to Board meetings, travel insurance, and director and officer liability insurance. 
  

 - 1 -
```

Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the
"Report") of Quick-Med Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2003, I, David S. Lerner, President, Principal Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                    November 19, 2003

                                /s/ David S. Lerner
                             Name:  David S. Lerner
                            Title:  President, Principal Officer,
                                    and Acting Chief Financial Officer
```
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00433

- CV

C HARLESZETTA Y

VONNE D ELONEY

, Appellant

V

.

T ODD K OSCELNIK A ND S ON §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 367th District

Court

of Denton County ( 19

- 3908

- 367 )

December 10, 2020

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was n o er ror in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant Charleszetta Yvonne Delone y shall pay all of

the cost s of this proceeding, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DI STRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

________________ Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5





<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         361,705
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    48,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               612,203
<PP&E>                                         102,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                 33,948
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,009,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          306,737
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       21,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,009,809
<SALES>                                        447,430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               447,430
<CGS>                                          229,482
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  229,482
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               611,223
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (393,275)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (393,275)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (393,275)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.02)




</TABLE>