alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

I, Thomas A. Hyde, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Teletouch Communications, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 13, 2006



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Thomas A. Hyde, Jr.
|    |  | Thomas A. Hyde, Jr.    
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
485 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
.* 

- . 

” 

. . . . 
Rwowbl.9 C. J. Wllile, Page 3 

lo aharit ) 8Pb all law uwapt- tlrntfar other thea tho property 

above natlamed 8bh1 ha aull and told." 

miOl0 719, Rovleed 8titUt.8, FfPOVide8: 

~fOl1~pF~8he11k UM@fl'W 

tuKitlwa, $0 vlt t 

I . . . . 

'7. lwllo ehaFIt1.r . -- All buIldIn b6- 

tho tosa of bow, tho coort16?&1w mu3 the *tata@. 

whothortha olub8 b puwt1amm ~1~ob8sw8bl. 

laetztutim#’ ir we of fad. BMO tho ahertn 

Wo therefore hold tbt ukdor the fOOt8 sobPitted to W 

t~~~y~q~ti~i8ti MO@ iraat@rr*tiO& 'l)ii8 WU- 
488 

Raawahlo c. J. wllae, Pbge 4
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio DIAZ-DELGADO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50126.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 18, 2011.

Bruce R. Castetter, Harold W. Chun, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael S. Berg, Law Offices of Michael S. Berg, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Antonio Diaz-Delgado appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 38-month sentence imposed for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Diaz-Delgado contends that the admission into evidence of a certificate of nonexistence of record (“CNR”) at trial violated his rights under the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause. The admission of the CNR was harmless error because the CNR was cumulative of other evidence demonstrating Diaz-Delgado’s lack of permission to re-enter the United States, including Diaz-Delgado’s admission that he returned illegally, and an Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agent’s testimony that there was no evidence of permission to re-enter in Diaz-Delgado’s A-file or computer databases. *See United States v. Orozco-Acosta,*607 F.3d 1156, 1161-62 (9th Cir.2010).

Diaz-Delgado also contends that *Nijhawan v. Holder,*—U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 2294, 174 L.Ed.2d 22 (2009), effectively overruled *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), such that his prior felony conviction had to be found by a jury before subjecting him to a greater maximum sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). The district court did not err by treating Diaz-Delgado’s prior felony conviction as a sentencing enhancement and increasing his statutory maximum sentence. *See United States v. Grajeda,*581 F.3d 1186, 1197 (9th Cir.2009) (holding that Almenda*640rez-Torres is binding unless it is expressly-overruled by the Supreme Court).

Finally, Diaz-Delgado contends the district court failed to properly apply the parsimony principle embodied in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The record reflects that the district court did not procedurally err, and that Diaz-Delgado’s sentence is not substantively unreasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           11834
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           16678
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      76381
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           10520
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             10693
<LOANS>                                         452802
<ALLOWANCE>                                       7271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  592742
<DEPOSITS>                                      393232
<SHORT-TERM>                                     36915
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               4303
<LONG-TERM>                                      33755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         74726
<OTHER-SE>                                       49811
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  592742
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  29631
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 4861
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 34492
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               14336
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               17194
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            17298
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      795
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  19
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  12881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5567
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        5567
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3906
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.12
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  6484
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       12
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 7271
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              7271
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### L.A. Gear, Inc., Appellant, v Kidfusion, LLC, et al., Respondents.

[859 NYS2d 141]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lancelot B. Hewitt, Special Ref.), entered December 3, 2007, directing the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants in the amount of $75,801.76, with statutory interest from the date of the Special Referee’s decision, unanimously modified, on the law, to increase the amount of the judgment by $802,116.47, with statutory interest on the latter amount from August 2, 2006, and otherwise affirmed, with costs in favor of plaintiff payable by defendants. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff alleges that the individual defendants, who own a 100% interest in defendant Kidfusion, LLC, fraudulently formed defendant Bradley Imports Apparel, LLC to take over Kidfu*203sion’s assets and business for the purpose of defeating a judgment that plaintiff had obtained against Kidfusion. Upon granting plaintiffs motion for a default judgment, the court referred “the issue of the assessment of Plaintiffs damages and attorneys’ fees” to a Special Referee to determine. The Special Referee, after noting his understanding that the attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses that plaintiff had incurred in this action and was seeking to recover were one and the same as the “ ‘damages’ ” it was also seeking to recover, assessed the reasonable value of plaintiffs attorneys’ fees and directed entry of judgment in the amount thereof plus the amount of plaintiffs other litigation expenses. This improperly deviated from the order of reference, which clearly indicated that damages and attorneys’ fees were separate issues and that both were to be determined *(cf. Dunleavy v White,*236 AD2d 316, 317 [1997]). Accordingly, we modify to award plaintiff, jointly and severally against defendants, an additional $802,116.47, the unpaid amount of plaintiffs judgment against Kidfusion, with interest thereon from August 2, 2006, the date the judgment was entered. Concur—Lippman, PJ., Mazzarelli, Williams, Sweeny and Acosta, JJ.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3427 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to protect States that have in 

effect laws or orders with respect to pay to play reform, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2009 

Mr. QUIGLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to protect States 

that have in effect laws or orders with respect to pay 

to play reform, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Ethics Law Pro5 tection Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAY TO PLAY REFORM. 

7 Section 112 of title 23, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3427 IH

1 ‘‘(h) PAY TO PLAY REFORM.—A State shall not be 

2 considered to have violated a requirement of this section 

3 solely because the State has in effect a law or an order 

4 that limits the amount of money an individual, who is 

5 doing business with a State agency with respect to a Fed6 eral-aid highway project, may contribute to a political 

7 campaign.’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00308

- CV

B AXTER C ONSTRUCTION C OMPANY

, LLC

, Appellant

V

.

S ENIOR C ARE L IVING VII, LLC

, Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 16 t h District Court

of Denton County ( 19

- 4506

- 16 )

October 22, 2020

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s order deny ing Appellant Baxter Construction

Company, LLC ’ s M otion to D ismiss . It is ordered that the trial court ’ s order is

affirmed

.

It is further ordered that A ppellant shall bear the costs of this appeal, for which

let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

B y /s/ Lee G a briel

Justice Lee Gabriel
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator and Foreign 
Utility Company Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SunE Beacon Site 2 LLC..................  EG17-122-000
Great Bay Solar I, LLC..................  EG17-123-000
Lackawanna Energy Center LLC............  EG17-124-000
SunE Beacon Site 5 LLC..................  EG17-125-000
Rattlesnake Power, LLC..................  EG17-126-000
Apple Blossom Wind, LLC.................  EG17-127-000
Stuttgart Solar, LLC....................  EG17-130-000
Cap Ridge Wind I, LLC...................  EG17-131-000
Cap Ridge Wind II, LLC..................  EG17-132-000
Cap Ridge Wind III, LLC.................  EG17-133-000
Cap Ridge Wind IV, LLC..................  EG17-134-000
Cap Ridge Interconnection, LLC..........  EG17-135-000
Aguaytia Energy del Peru SRL (I Squared   FC17-4-000
 Capital).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of September 2017, the status of 
the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign 
Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's 
regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) (2017).

    Dated: October 11, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-22461 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
NO. 12-09-00114-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RANDALL RAYMOND CROSBY, § APPEAL FROM THE 

APPELLANT

V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant was convicted of driving

while intoxicated, and sentence was imposed on March 3, 2009. Thereafter, Appellant timely filed

a notice of appeal.

To be sufficient to invoke the appellate court’s full jurisdiction, the notice of appeal filed by

an appellant in a criminal case must bear the trial court’s certification of the appellant’s right to

appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The

certification should be part of the record when notice is filed, but may be added by timely

amendment or supplementation. Id. Appellant’s notice of appeal does not include the required

certification.

On April 24, 2009, this court notified Appellant, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure 25.2 and 37.2, that the notice of appeal does not include the trial court certification. The

notice also informed Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless, on or before May 11,

2009, the clerk’s record was amended to include the required certification.

The deadline for responding to this court’s notice has expired, and the clerk’s record has not

been amended to show Appellant’s right to appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered May 29, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
*Order Entered March 23, 2010:*

#### Alpha Capital Management, Inc v Rentenbach,

Docket No. 287280;

reported at 287 Mich App 589.

The Court orders that the March 9, 2010, opinion is hereby vacated, and a new opinion is attached.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes
      - Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Professional Lease Management Income Fund
      I, L.L.C., (the “Fund”), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Manager and of
      the Fund, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)  the
      Report of the Fund filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.














/s/
      Richard K
      Brock


Richard
      K
      Brock


Chief
      Financial
      Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.


(Principal
      Financial
      Officer)


March
      29,
      2006
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6931

OSBALDO LEMUS BERRIOS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MICHAEL S. WOLL; WOLL & WOLL, P.A. , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Theodore D. Chuang , District Judge. ( 8:20

- cv - 03195

- TDC )

Submitted : December 21, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Osbaldo Lemus Berrios, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-6931 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Osbaldo Lemus Berrios appeals the district court’s order dismissing Berrios’ civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. See Berrios v. Woll , No

. 8:20

- cv - 03195

- TDC ( D. Md

. May 12 , 2021 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-6931 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Scott J. Davidson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                               
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Scott J. Davidson
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                    |  | Scott J. Davidson                             
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                   |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA RCH 29, 2019

NO. 03
- 18
- 00124
- CR

Ex parte Vester Saylee

APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KER, AND SMITH AFFIRMED
-- OPINION BY JU STICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order denying habeas

- corpus relief entered by the trial court. Having

re viewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error
in the trial court’s order denying habeas

- corpus relief . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order denying habeas

- corpus relief

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

# Certification Pursuant
To18 US C Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 Of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (the Registrant)
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Russell C. Ellwanger,
Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and section 13 (a).
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/  Russell C.  Ellwanger 
 Russell C.  Ellwanger Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 30, 2009

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

---