alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3501 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 

pet care expenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2009 

Mr. MCCOTTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

deduction for pet care expenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Humanity and Pets 

5 Partnered Through the Years (HAPPY) Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) According to the 2007–2008 National Pet 

9 Owners Survey, 63 percent of United States house10 holds own a pet. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3501 IH

1 (2) The Human-Animal Bond has been shown 

2 to have positive effects upon people’s emotional and 

3 physical well-being. 

4 SEC. 3. DEDUCTION FOR PET CARE EXPENSES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part VII of subchapter B of chap6 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 

7 additional itemized deductions for individuals) is amended 

8 by redesignating section 224 as section 225 and by insert9 ing after section 223 the following new section: 

10 ‘‘SEC. 224. PET CARE EXPENSES. 

11 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION.—In the case of an 

12 individual, there shall be allowed as a deduction for the 

13 taxable year an amount equal to the qualified pet care ex14 penses of the taxpayer during the taxable year for any 

15 qualified pet of the taxpayer. 

16 ‘‘(b) MAXIMUM DEDUCTION.—The amount allowable 

17 as a deduction under subsection (a) to the taxpayer for 

18 any taxable year shall not exceed $3,500. 

19 ‘‘(c) QUALIFIED PET CARE EXPENSES.—For pur20 poses of this section, the term ‘qualified pet care expenses’ 

21 means amounts paid in connection with providing care (in22 cluding veterinary care) for a qualified pet other than any 

23 expense in connection with the acquisition of the qualified 

24 pet. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3501 IH

1 ‘‘(d) QUALIFIED PET.—For purposes of this sec2 tion— 

3 ‘‘(1) QUALIFIED PET.—The term ‘qualified pet’ 

4 means a legally owned, domesticated, live animal. 

5 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTIONS.—Such term does not include 

6 any animal— 

7 ‘‘(A) used for research or owned or utilized 

8 in conjunction with a trade or business, or 

9 ‘‘(B) with respect to which the taxpayer 

10 has claimed a deduction under section 162 or 

11 213 in any of the preceding 3 taxable years.’’. 

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

13 for part VII of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 

14 is amended by striking the last item and inserting the fol15 lowing new items: 

‘‘Sec. 224. Pet care expenses. 

‘‘Sec. 225. Cross reference.’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

18 December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following    Registration Statements:     (1) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-134765)    pertaining to the 2001 Stock Option Plan and the 2006 Equity    Incentive Plan of LoopNet, Inc., and     (2) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-140288)    pertaining to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan of LoopNet, Inc.;     of our reports dated February 25, 2008, with respect to the    consolidated financial statements of LoopNet, Inc. and the    effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of    LoopNet, Inc., included in this Annual Report    (Form 10-K)    for the year ended December 31, 2007. /s/  Ernst &    Young LLP     Los Angeles, California    February 29, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

         CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Transition Auto Finance III
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kenneth C. Lowe, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 12, 2005                   /s/ Kenneth C. Lowe
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Kenneth C. Lowe
                                   Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royster-Clark, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul M. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    PAUL M. MURPHYPaul M. MurphyChief Financial Officer


November 14, 2002




1
#### John DOE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent.

No. 2008-3139.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 16, 2008.

ON MOTION

*ORDER*

Petitioner moves without opposition for reconsideration of the court’s April 10, 2008, order dismissing his petition for review for failure to file a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning discrimination and a 14-day extension to file his initial brief.

Petitioner has now submitted a Rule 15(c) statement.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The court’s April 10, 2008 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the petition for review is reinstated.

(2) Petitioner’s brief is due on or before April 28, 2008.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### State Department

          - [Public Notice: 10173]

The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. State Department—Overseas Security Advisory Council on November 14, 2017. Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(7)(E), it has been determined that the meeting will be closed to the public. The meeting will focus on an examination of corporate security policies and procedures and will involve extensive discussion of trade secrets and proprietary commercial information that is privileged and confidential, and will discuss law enforcement investigative techniques and procedures. The agenda will include updated committee reports, a global threat overview, and other matters relating to private sector security policies and protective programs and the protection of U.S. business information overseas.

*For More Information Contact:*                     Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security Advisory Council, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, phone: 571-345-2214.                

Thomas G. Scanlon,

Executive Director, Overseas Security Advisory Council, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2017-22837 Filed 10-19-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-43-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

TYLER JAMES WHITHAM, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-3388 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 17, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bilal Ahmed Faruqui, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa; and Allison C. Heim, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellee.

KELLY, Judge.

Tyler James Whitham was originally charged with aggravated assault with a firearm. He pleaded no contest to the reduced charge of improper exhibition of a- 2 -

firearm, a first-degree misdemeanor, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss based on the Stand Your Ground statute, section 776.032 , Florida Statutes (2018). In Martin v. State, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1016, D1017 (Fla. 2d DCA May 4, 2018), this court held that the 2017 amendment to the statute that shifted the burden of proof to the State applied to cases pending on appeal even when the immunity hearing was held before the effective date of the statute. As was the case in Martin, the trial court here denied Mr. Whitham's motion to dismiss on the ground that he did not carry his burden of proof. Accordingly, we conclude that this case is controlled by Martin and that we are required to reverse for a new evidentiary hearing at which the State will have the burden of proof. See id. at D1018. If at the conclusion of the new immunity hearing the trial court determines that Mr. Whitham is entitled to immunity, it shall enter an order to that effect and dismiss the information with prejudice. Id. Conversely, if it determines that he is not entitled to immunity, the court shall enter an order reflecting its findings and reinstate Mr. Whitham's conviction.

We acknowledge that our holding in Martin is in conflict with Love v. State, 247 So. 3d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA), review granted, No. SC18-747, 2018 WL 3147946 (Fla. June 26, 2018), and Hight v. State, 253 So. 3d 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018), and accordingly certify the conflict.

Reversed and remanded with directions; conflict certified.

MORRIS and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
## NUMBER 13

- 2 3

- 00 171

- CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JAMES HOLT

, Appellant

,

v.

ADRIANA DIAZ

, Appellee

.

_

___________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Nueces County, Texas.

_

___________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Tijerina, Silva, and Peña

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva

On May 3 , 2023 , appellant filed a notice of appeal. On May 3 , 2023, the Clerk of

the Court notified appellant that his notice of appeal was not in compliance with the Texas

Rule of Appellant Procedure 9. 1 ( b ) , 9.5, and 25.1(d)(1), (2), (3), (4)

.2 On June 13 , 2023

, t he Clerk of this Court notified appellant the appeal was subject

to dismissal if an amended, compliant notice of appeal was not filed within ten days from

the date of th e n otice

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.3(b), (c).

Appellant has not cured the defective notice of appeal, nor otherwise responded

to the notices from the clerk requiring a response or other action within the time specified;

accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b), (c).

CLARISSA SILVA

Justice

D elivered and filed on the

20th day of July , 202 3

.
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Thomas R. Brown, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Laburnum Ventures Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for
        the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                          



| | By:    | /s/ Thomas R. Brown                                        
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                            
| | Name:  | THOMAS R. BROWN                                            
| |        |                                                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and 
      Chief  Financial Officer
| |        |                                                            
| | Date:  | February 13, 2007                                          





A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and
  will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates,
  is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to
  be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities
  Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
  the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language
  contained in such filing.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MELVIN ANTHONY MURRELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D17-3043 and 4D17-3045

[November 15, 2018]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Usan, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

10-008685CF10A and 11-18378CF10A.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Louis G. Carres, Assistant 

Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 

West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina 

Jiminez-Orosa, Senior, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Beijing Century Health Medical, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. /s/Wilson CheungWilson Cheung, Chief Executive Officer Date: December 31, 2010
#### Dulce Cepin, Respondent, v Juan C. Hernandez et al., Respondents, and Patrick W. Carey, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 620]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered April 16, 1997, which denied defendant Carey’s motion for a change of venue from New York County to Orleans County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to change venue from New York to Orleans County in light of the fact that the plaintiff and one of the defendants reside in New York County and, furthermore, that the majority of the non-party witnesses, including two eyewitnesses and several physicians who treated plaintiff in New York County and who reside in or near that county, would be inconvenienced by having to travel to a distant county *(Schneeweiss v Pelkey,*138 AD2d 271).

We have considered appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.
----

Exhibit 6 

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE 
    Wescast Industries, Inc.(the "Company") is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal yearended December 28, 2003 (the "Report") with the United States Securities andExchange Commission. 

    I, Edward G. Frackowiak,Executive Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 
- The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and  
- The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results  of operations of the Company. 

Date: May 3, 2004   /s/ Edward G. Frackowiak  Name: Edward G.    Frackowiak  Title: Executive    Chairman and Interim ChiefExecutive Officer
 

 **CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**
    Wescast Industries, Inc.(the "Company") is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal yearended December 28, 2003 (the "Report") with the United States Securities andExchange Commission. 

    I, Gordon E. Currie, VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 
- The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and  
- The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results  of operations of the Company. 
Date: May 3, 2004   /s/ Gordon E. Currie      Name: Gordon E. Currie      Title: Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Richard Ferguson certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CoConnect, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Richard Ferguson Richard Ferguson, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  August 21, 2007