alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.43


Summary of Annual Incentive Plan


Krispy Kreme has an informal annual incentive plan which represents, in most cases, the short-term component of our incentive compensation package. This plan was originally adopted by the Compensation Committee in July 2006 and was expanded to cover executive officers in December 2006. This plan ties the incentive compensation payable to the employee principally to the attainment of specific, objective performance targets. These targets are based on actual overall company performance compared to our business plan objectives. It is expected that key plan measurements will include revenues, EBITDA, cash flow from operations, other company performance metrics and, to reflect the importance of building sustainable growth, other measurements based on progress in achieving our mission and strategic objectives. The targets will not be based, implicitly or explicitly, on meeting or exceeding any earnings guidance, consensus earnings estimates or similar
measures.


The amount of cash incentives potentially payable to employees is determined based on (1) a target cash incentive amount which is set as a percentage of an individual employee’s salary and (2) how actual results compare to the targeted performance measures.


Initial awards to executive officers under the plan were made on a pro rated basis with respect to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. Going forward, however, we expect that key plan measurements for executive officers will be determined on an annual basis and cash incentives will be payable (in compliance with applicable tax rules regarding deferred compensation) in the first quarter of the fiscal year following the year in which performance is tested. With respect to awards for employees other than executive officers, we expect that, in the near term, these awards will be payable on a quarterly basis.


The Compensation Committee has the authority under the annual incentive plan to adjust any goal with respect to the executive officers and the other employees. These decisions are subjective and based generally on a review of the circumstances affecting results to determine if any events were unusual or unforeseen.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3050 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitations 

on the amount excluded from the gross estate with respect to land 

subject to a qualified conservation easement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2009 

Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself, Mr. CANTOR, and Mr. KIND) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the limitations on the amount excluded from the gross 

estate with respect to land subject to a qualified conservation easement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Family 

5 Farm and Ranchland Protection Act’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3050 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATIONS ON THE AMOUNT EX2 CLUDED FROM THE GROSS ESTATE WITH RE3 SPECT TO LAND SUBJECT TO A QUALIFIED 

4 CONSERVATION EASEMENT. 

5 (a) INCREASE IN DOLLAR LIMITATION ON EXCLU6 SION.—Paragraph (3) of section 2031(c) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exclusion limitation) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘the exclusion limitation is’’ and 

9 all that follows and inserting ‘‘the exclusion limitation is 

10 $5,000,000.’’. 

11 (b) INCREASE IN PERCENTAGE OF VALUE OF LAND

12 WHICH IS EXCLUDABLE.—Paragraph (2) of section 

13 2031(c) of such Code (relating to applicable percentage) 

14 is amended— 

15 (1) by striking ‘‘40 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘50 

16 percent’’, and 

17 (2) by striking ‘‘2 percentage points’’ and in18 serting ‘‘2.5 percentage points’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to the estates of decedents dying 

21 after December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5

<LEGEND>                   This document contains summary financial information
                           extracted from the financial  statements contained in
                           the  attached  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K  for the
                           fiscal year ended  December 31, 1999 and is qualified
                           in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such  financial
                           statements.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                      0000927632
<NAME>                     INDIANTOWN COGENERATION, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                              5,700,906
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       13,471,985
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         1,146,017
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    21,170,730
<PP&E>                              641,449,055
<DEPRECIATION>                      65,534,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      694,852,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               21,693,092
<BONDS>                             591,252,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        694,852,029
<SALES>                             163,270,119
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    163,270,119
<CGS>                               74,789,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       85,502,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    10,713,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  57,475,271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     22,414,020
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 22,414,020
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        22,414,020
<EPS-BASIC>                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0


</TABLE>
1 ... S eeT EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 01 9- CV GAR R Y GI B B ONS AP P E L L ANT V . KA REN CU LW ELLBA RN ETT A PPELL EE

----- ----- FR O M THE 3 67 DI STRI CT CO URT O F DENTO N CO UN TY TH

----- ----- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON AND J UDGME NT 1

----- ----- W e have consi der ed appel l ee’ s “A gr eed Fi r st A m ended M ot i on T o D i sm i ss A p p e a l B a s e d O n M o o t n e s s .” It is t h e c o u r t ’s o p in io n t h a t t h e m o t io n s h o u ld b e g ra n te d ; th e re fo re , w e d i s m i s s th e a p p e a l . S eeT EX. R . A PP . P . 4 2 .1 (a )(2 )(A ), 4 3 .2 (f). C os t s oft he app ea l s hal l be pa i d by ap pel l ant , f orw hi ch l ete x e c ut i on i s s u e . S ee T EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 1( d) , 43. 4.
P E R CU R I AM PA N EL D : DA U PH I N O T, J. ; CA YC E, C. J. ; an d M C C O Y, J.DEL I VERE D: Apr i l 17, 2008
! 
"

#$%  & 
     

"'	(	

)







"


 
"*

 





#$%
	+&,	(- .	/ .
 
#
"

 
/0 

1  


2
$%

!
1
'	(	

	

3 

	

!1



 








7KH +RQRUDEOH 'DQ $DURQ 3ROVWHU 

WKH 1RUWKHUQ 'LVWULFW RI 2KLR VLWWLQJ E\ 



5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//

3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUF

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )

)LOH 1DPH D

		

345&67$%8&6

::::::::::::

767$7( 2) ;8,/,2

267$1=$<

*,&+$(/ 267$1=$

71








200,66,21(5 2) %17(51$/5(9(18(






49


+(>>
?;
@

$
B3

;
3
B3

)BC%@*C%))

D4@$&75;


	 	

	 		




	


@*E
5
)
;4@;$D&6*E7@F%7G;@9D&"*

  & & *
 5
 3 9%&7;$&&7$ ;7D5&*7& 43 A9$&%7 DD7@@&7$7&%4&8;%F%$%40
;







54@;@77C%@*

A;

H

  
3
*

 
%>>	

3


%"#


"

 *
 H 
 1   

.$%/ ""
&$%

" 
;


 "


;


1
"



$%" 

*

"
    *
   1  ;

2I"
1



"1&%5$



"



 

1 

*


3  

	!1





 





		
 
;

 1(->"
    
"

%

"""
 

&



 

"  

 
1

1
"

 "


1 

	
 -- 3  +(
 .>>(/ "
$% 1" /

&

 





   1   
$%

2!19$'	(	JK L" I   

 " 
1



 
   "M 
$% 



4




&"JKL
#


  M 	+ 35 ' 
+ 	

	 		


I" 
  

    # 
M

# 
"    # 
 
  # #


"
"
"

#"

& I" "   1
 " *


#*
1



#J" 
"M&" 


 
  
     "
  
"
"
*;

2 

 
  "  
 
 

*

#" 
  #
*  & 1I" "    #  
 A 
 ;




3
"

*
;




$%";

 

*
"
"
%";

 

"$%

 
$%


"&

 
"I


""$% 1    
 !     
	
,&	->	,
.>/.


"$%/ 
"$%)G*
46H#$%&		&
'
	
(
  )

 # 
+ A &12 --	 .>>	/.





"1
$%/

*
;

2 



*
;

;

 
 

 "

$% 




*
1



		
 




;

H 
%

  9
 $  #* %
 3
*

C*;

%
 
3
6
" )
>>N-

% 4  >>	   

   %"  
" 
 ;

*

1$% " A"  >>- *
  N-   

  
 3 

"

   " 
 



;

"*


"  
 
H
" I"
 >>-*
"*""*"	>>-

;

1"


"
  
 
  
;

2
1$%  (->

  1  
 2

1
1


"&1  


, 	

	 		


&

%5





"

;

2./$% 



.	/
 J
M 
2!1
3 

1 

I"1$%





"
" *
   1 
  ;

  *
*
!1
1

 



 		

	!""#$%&

0
 12

J"

M*$

	-
3-,	-,	(.+
		/J3

"


 

 
 

  
 

   
#  
M+(
		>3-,
,	.+
		/.
I
#
/#$"!'!#

$
	./%5


  1   
      2! 1 
 !   1
 

	+9$'	./.		/&1;

2 
1'	./
*
 




$
$%JKL






M

 
J



M     
 	 
, & 	-> 	,
.>/)$%
"
"
   
     
 
   

		
 , 
 	 ( .J%
"
!6 

" 
1

1
"

M/ 
  



 
   %   

   
   -


	.



/.
/

*


"





  *
  
" $%"$H1

OB 0 ;

 H 


*
PBOB0"PB) KL 

%"&1 I


1

 
 *
 *


"1

"
1
>>	 
" 
    
H 
       #

"


   " 
 #
 

*
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TERRY BRADLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2023-1878

June 5, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, 

Judge.

Terry Bradley, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6070

SHERMAN ROSS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RON ANGELONE, Director; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; UNITED

STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-964-2)

Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 21, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherman Ross, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

2 See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10

F.3d 1064 (4th Cir. 1993).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. Appellant's complaint was dismissed

without prejudice to his right to resubmit the case with the court

ordered questionnaire. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders, and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders.1 Because Appellant may be able to save this action by

filing the court ordered questionnaire, the dismissal order which

Appellant seeks to appeal is not an appealable final order.2

Accordingly we dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3278 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3278

          To provide for a hospital in Cass County, Minnesota.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2009

 Mr. Oberstar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To provide for a hospital in Cass County, Minnesota.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDICARE CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL DESIGNATION.

    Section 405(h) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and 
Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173; 117 Stat. 2269) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Exception.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The amendment made by paragraph 
                (1) shall not apply to the certification by the State 
                of Minnesota on or after January 1, 2006, under section 
                1820(c)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Social Security Act (42 
                U.S.C. 1395i-4(c)(2)(B)(i)(II)) of one hospital that 
                meets the criteria described in subparagraph (B) and is 
                located in Cass County, Minnesota, as a necessary 
                provider of health care services to residents in the 
                area of the hospital.
                    ``(B) Criteria described.--A hospital meets the 
                criteria described in this subparagraph if the 
                hospital--
                            ``(i) has been granted an exception by the 
                        State to an otherwise applicable statutory 
                        restriction on hospital construction or 
                        licensing prior to the date of enactment of 
                        this subparagraph; and
                            ``(ii) is located on property which the 
                        State has approved for conveyance to a county 
                        within the State prior to such date of 
                        enactment.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4.14
 
 SIMS|GROUPLevel 6 Sims Group House8th January, 2007
    
    41 McLaren Street North Sydney NSW 2060 AustraliaGPO Box 4155 Sydney NSW 2001Phone 612 9956 9100 Facsimile 612 9954 9680www.sims-group.comMr Tom BirdSims Group Limited ABN 69 114 838 630Dear Tom,
 EMPLOYMENT WITH SIMS GROUP
  Commencement Date and Leave Provisions
  Position
  Term
  Location
   Remuneration




---



##### 



Confidential Information
  Disclosure of Interest
    
 JEREMY SUTCLIFFE
Group Chief Executive
  (SIGNATURE)Tom Bird
    
    Signature9/2/07

Date
FILED

January 22, 1999

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE 

 AUGUST 1998 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

)

Appellee, ) No. 01C01-9711-CC-00521

 )

) Coffee County

v. ) 

) Honorable Gerald Ewell, Sr., Judge

)

PARKS A. BRYAN, ) (First degree murder) 

) 

Appellant. )

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur in the results reached and most of the reasoning used in the

majority opinion. However, I respectfully disagree with its conclusion that all of the

photographs were properly admitted.

Two color photographs from the autopsy show the rib cage area of the

victim’s body with the skin cut away. As the majority admits, they are “somewhat

graphic and gruesome.” Before the state sought to introduce these photographs, two

doctors had testified for the state relative to the victim’s injuries. One described the

severity of the breaks in the victim’s ribs as follows:

A lot of times I probably see three or four people a week with

rib fractures which are simple fractures. We call them green

stick like where you might take a limb off the tree and bend it

up and break it and let it come back. When you look at it, it

looks solid and still is solid and strong, but it has a small crack

in it. This particular lady, she had multiple compound

fractures. Her bones were literally broken apart, and these

broken portions then entered the lung and caused the lung to

collapse and the bleeding to occur, so as you know, a lot of

people have four or five or six fractured ribs and do not have

problems with their lungs, but this particular lady had so many

multiple compound fractures that these fractures were very

extensive so that is what caused her slow bleeding death, and
2

these fractured ribs then entered the lung, and the evidence

shows that she bled to death over a period of time. 

The pathologist was no less blunt and graphic in his testimony. 

At no time did the defense seek to contest the extent of the injuries as

described by the doctors. Under these circumstances, I believe that these two

photographs should have been excluded under Rule 403, Tenn. R. Evidence. In light of

the doctors’ graphic testimony and the defendant’s acquiescence in that testimony, the

photographs were superfluously cumulative in terms of proving the extent of the rib and

internal damages. On the other hand, given the nature of the doctors’ testimony and

the other photographs, I do not believe that the two photographs of concern more

probably than not affected the outcome of the case. See T.R.A.P. 36(b). 

____________________________

Joseph M. Tipton, Judge
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-141408 and 333-135119) pertaining to the Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. 2006 Performance Incentive Plan and 1999 Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 333-145944) pertaining tothe registration of shares of common stock of Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, of our report dated March 18, 2009 with respect to the financial statements of Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. and included in theAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

 

Seattle, Washington 

March 18, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                          1,167,273
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   85,848
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     2,237
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,985,309
<PP&E>                          1,679,722
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,360,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           281,477
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        11,771
<OTHER-SE>                      3,752,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,360,703
<SALES>                         293,763
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                293,763
<CGS>                           309,787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   309,787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                455,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (548,523)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (548,523)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (548,523)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.05)



</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 317 

To amend the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 to include 

the Quincy Homestead within the boundary of the Adams National 

Historical Park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2009 

Mr. DELAHUNT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 

to include the Quincy Homestead within the boundary 

of the Adams National Historical Park, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Adams National Historical Park Boundary Addition Act 

6 of 2009’’. 

7 (b) FINDING.—The Quincy Homestead has been des8 ignated a National Historic Landmark. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 317 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION TO ADAMS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK. 

2 Section 4(b) of the Adams National Historical Park 

3 Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 410eee–2(b)) is amended— 

4 (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para5 graph (3); and 

6 (2) by adding after paragraph (1) the following 

7 new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(2) The property at 34 Butler Road in Quin9 cy, Massachusetts, known as the Quincy Homestead 

10 and carriage shed, consisting of approximately 1.8 

11 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled 

12 ‘Boundary Addition Adams National Historical 

13 Park’, numbered N.E.R.R.D. 386/80,001, and dated 

14 August, 2003.’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Brown, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 866]

—Judgment unani*1146mously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J.—Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Balio and Fallon, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

                    Title 5, U.S.C. Section 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Public Law 95-454, requires that the appointment of Performance Review Board Members be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    . The following persons may be named to serve on the Performance Review Boards or Panels, which oversee the evaluation of performance appraisals of Senior Executive Service members of the Department of Health and Human Services.                

## Employee Name

Barry, Daniel

Barlow, Amanda

Coughlin, Janis

Fantinato, Jessica

Gentile, John

Johnson, Jeffrey

Katz, Ruth

Kretschmaier, Michon

Lewis, Lisa

McDaniel, Eileen

Novy, Steve

Sample, Allen

Skeadas, Christos

Tobias, Constance

Weber, Mark

      ( print page 49035)    
Dated: October 16, 2017.

Charles H. McEnerney III,

Director, Executive and Scientific Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 2017-22863 Filed 10-20-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4151-17-P