Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2017 / Notices 49257 

the Contributor to immediately obtain a 

full refund of the Contribution. 

Applicant submits that the Adviser 

reviewed its Policy and concluded that 

it was adequate for preventing 

impermissible contributions. 

10. Applicant states that after learning 

of the Contribution, it confirmed that 

the although the Contributor’s job 

would not ordinarily cause him to 

interact with the Clients, after learning 

of the Contribution, the Adviser, out of 

an abundance of caution, instructed him 

not to solicit or otherwise communicate 

with the Clients for two years following 

the date of the Contribution. 

11. Applicant asserts that the Clients’ 

decisions to invest with the Adviser 

occurred long before the Contribution 

was made, in October 2016. 

Furthermore, no investments were made 

in the month-long period between the 

date of the Contribution and the day it 

was refunded. Applicant states that, at 

the time of the Contribution and at the 

time of the investments by the Clients, 

the Official has not had any role in the 

Clients’ investment decisions. Applicant 

also submits that the apparent intent in 

making the Contribution was not to 

influence the selection or retention of 

the Adviser. Applicant represents that 

the Contributor and the Official have a 

long standing friendship as the 

Contributor worked at the Official’s 

restaurant and lived with the Official 

and her ex-husband when he was in 

college. Applicant finally states that it 

was because of that relationship, and 

not any desire to influence the award of 

investment advisory business that the 

Contributor made the Contribution to 

the Official’s campaign. 

12. Applicant submits that neither the 

Adviser nor the Contributor sought to 

interfere with the Clients’ merit-based 

selection process for advisory services, 

nor did they seek to negotiate higher 

fees or greater ancillary benefits than 

would be achieved in arms’ length 

transactions. Applicant further submits 

that there was no violation of the 

Adviser’s fiduciary duty to deal fairly or 

disclose material conflicts given the 

absence of any intent or action by the 

Adviser or the Contributor to influence 

the selection process. Applicant 

contends that in the case of the 

Contribution, the imposition of the twoyear prohibition on compensation does 

not achieve rule 206(4)–5’s purposes 

and would result in consequences 

disproportionate to the mistake that was 

made. 

Applicant’s Conditions 

The Applicant agrees that any order of 

the Commission granting the requested 

relief will be subject to the following 

conditions: 

1. The Contributor will be prohibited 

from discussing the business of the 

Adviser with any ‘‘government entity’’ 

client for which the Official is an 

‘‘official,’’ each as defined in Rule 

206(4)–5(f), until October 18, 2018. 

2. The Contributor will receive a 

written notification of this condition 

and will provide a quarterly certificate 

of compliance until October 18, 2018. 

Copies of the certifications will be 

maintained and preserved in an easily 

accessible place for a period of not less 

than five years, the first two years in an 

appropriate office of the Adviser, and be 

available for inspection by the staff of 

the Commission. 

3. The Adviser will conduct testing 

reasonably designed to prevent 

violations of the conditions of the Order 

and maintain records regarding such 

testing, which will be maintained and 

preserved in an easily accessible place 

for a period of not less than five years, 

the first two years in an appropriate 

office of the Adviser, and be available 

for inspection by the staff of the 

Commission. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Investment Management, under delegated 

authority. 

Eduardo A. Aleman, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2017–22955 Filed 10–23–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings 

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, 

October 26, 2017. 

PLACE: Closed Commission Hearing 

Room 10800. 

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to 

the public. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the 

Commissioners, the Secretary to the 

Commission, and recording secretaries 

will attend the closed meeting. Certain 

staff members who have an interest in 

the matters also may be present. 

The General Counsel of the 

Commission, or his designee, has 

certified that, in his opinion, one or 

more of the exemptions set forth in 5 

U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) 

and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(7), 

(a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit 

consideration of the scheduled matters 

at the closed meeting. 

Chairman Clayton, as duty officer, 

voted to consider the items listed for the 

closed meeting in closed session. 

The subject matters of the closed 

meeting will be: 

Institution and settlement of 

injunctive actions; 

Institution and settlement of 

administrative proceedings; and 

Other matters relating to enforcement 

proceedings. 

At times, changes in Commission 

priorities require alterations in the 

scheduling of meeting items. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information and to ascertain 

what, if any, matters have been added, 

deleted or postponed; please contact 

Brent J. Fields from the Office of the 

Secretary at (202) 551–5400. 

Dated: October 19, 2017. 

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2017–23123 Filed 10–20–17; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM 

Forms Submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget for Extension 

of Clearance 

AGENCY: Selective Service System. 

ACTION: Notice. 

The following forms have been 

submitted to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for extension of 

clearance in compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act: 

SSS Forms 2, 3A, 3B and 3C 

Title: Selective Service System Change of 

Information, Correction/Change Form, and 

Registration Status Forms. 

Purpose: To insure the accuracy and 

completeness of the Selective Service System 

registration data. 

Respondents: Registrants are required to 

report changes or corrections in data 

submitted on the SSS Form 1. 

Frequency: When changes in a registrant’s 

name or address occur. 

Burden: A burden of two minutes or less 

on the individual respondent. 

Copies of the above identified forms 

can be obtained upon written request to 

the Selective Service System, Reports 

Clearance Officer, 1515 Wilson 

Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22209– 

2425. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

extension of clearance of the form 

should be sent within 60 days of the 

publication of this notice to the 

Selective Service System, Reports 

Clearance Officer, 1515 Wilson 

Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22209– 

2425. 

A copy of the comments should be 

sent to the Office of Information and 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
49258 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2017 / Notices 

Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Desk 

Officer, Selective Service System, Office 

of Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, Room 3235, 

Washington, DC 20503. 

Donald M. Benton, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 2017–23010 Filed 10–23–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8015–01–P 

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 

[Docket No. SSA–2017–0058] 

Notice of Senior Executive Service 

Performance Review Board 

Membership 

AGENCY: Social Security Administration. 

ACTION: Notice of Senior Executive 

Service Performance Review Board 

Membership. 

Title 5, U.S. Code, 4314(c)(4), requires 

that the appointment of Performance 

Review Board members be published in 

the Federal Register before service on 

said Board begins. 

The following persons will serve on 

the Performance Review Board which 

oversees the evaluation of performance 

appraisals of Senior Executive Service 

members of the Social Security 

Administration: 

Michael Kramer 

Bonnie Doyle * 

Joanne Gasparini 

Erik Hansen * 

John Lee 

Joseph Lytle * 

Natalie Lu 

Dan Parry * 

Patrice Stewart 

* New Member 

Marianna LaCanfora, 

Deputy Commissioner for Human Resources. 

[FR Doc. 2017–22961 Filed 10–23–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

[Summary Notice No. PE–2017–83] 

Petition for Exemption; Summary of 

Petition Received 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption 

received. 

SUMMARY: This notice contains a 

summary of a petition seeking relief 

from specified requirements of Federal 

Aviation Regulations. The purpose of 

this notice is to improve the public’s 

awareness of, and participation in, this 

aspect of the FAA’s regulatory activities. 

Neither publication of this notice nor 

the inclusion or omission of information 

in the summary is intended to affect the 

legal status of the petition or its final 

disposition. 

DATES: Comments on this petition must 

identify the petition docket number 

involved and must be received on or 

before November 13, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified 

by docket number FAA–2017–0919 

using any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and follow 

the online instructions for sending your 

comments electronically. 

• Mail: Send comments to Docket 

Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of 

Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West 

Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 

20590–0001. 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take 

comments to Docket Operations in 

Room W12–140 of the West Building 

Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

• Fax: Fax comments to Docket 

Operations at 202–493–2251. 

Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 

553(c), DOT solicits comments from the 

public to better inform its rulemaking 

process. DOT posts these comments, 

without edit, including any personal 

information the commenter provides, to 

http://www.regulations.gov, as 

described in the system of records 

notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can 

be reviewed at http://www.dot.gov/ 

privacy. 

Docket: Background documents or 

comments received may be read at 

http://www.regulations.gov at any time. 

Follow the online instructions for 

accessing the docket or go to the Docket 

Operations in Room W12–140 of the 

West Building Ground Floor at 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lynette Mitterer, AIR–673, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356, 

email Lynette.Mitterer@faa.gov, phone 

(425) 227–1047; or Alphonso 

Pendergrass, ARM–200, Office of 

Rulemaking, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, 

email alphonso.pendergrass@faa.gov, 

phone (202) 267–4713. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

14 CFR 11.85. 

Suzanne Masterson, 

Acting Manager, Transport Standards 

Branch. 

Petition for Exemption 

Docket No.: FAA–2017–0919. 

Petitioner: Bombardier Aerospace. 

Section of 14 CFR Affected: § 25.901(c). 

Description of Relief Sought: Bombardier 

Aerospace is petitioning for an exemption to 

14 CFR 25.901(c) for single failures of the 

Throttle Quadrant Assembly (TQA) and the 

Propulsion control system that result in 

Uncontrollable High Thrust (UHT). The 

Bombardier Model BD–700–2A12 and BD– 

700–2A13 Series airplanes (Global 7000 and 

Global 8000, respectively) may not be 

controllable under certain landing and 

takeoff scenarios during a UHT event that 

occurs in crosswinds in excess of 15 knots. 

[FR Doc. 2017–23059 Filed 10–23–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

[Docket No. FHWA–2017–0044] 

Proposed Memorandum of 

Understanding (MOU) Assigning 

Certain Federal Environmental 

Responsibilities to the State of 

Arizona, Including National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 

Authority for Certain Categorical 

Exclusions (CEs) 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed MOU; 

request for comments. 

SUMMARY: The FHWA and the State of 

Arizona, acting by and through its 

Department of Transportation (State), 

propose participation of the State in the 

Categorical Exclusion Assignment 

program. This Program allows FHWA to 

assign to States its authority and 

responsibility for determining whether 

certain designated activities within the 

geographic boundaries of the State, as 

specified in the proposed Memorandum 

of Understanding (MOU), are 

categorically excluded from preparation 

of an environmental assessment or an 

environmental impact statement under 

the National Environmental Policy Act. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before November 24, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by DOT Document 

Management System (DMS) Docket 

Number [FHWA–2017–0044], by any of 

the methods described below. To ensure 

that you do not duplicate your 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES