alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Steve M. Hanni, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Emergency Filtration Products,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003

/s/Steve M. Hanni
Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Poseidis,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2005, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Louis Pardo dit
Pardau,  Chief  Executive  Officer (or equivalent  thereof) and Chief  Financial
Officer (or equivalent thereof) of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



Date:  October 13, 2005     By:  /s/ Louis Pardo dit Pardau
                               ------------------------------------
                               Louis Pardo dit Pardau
                               Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                               Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)





---------------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                                   EXHIBIT 12

                                              QUALITY STORES, INC.
                      SCHEDULE REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                                 (in thousands)




                                                       Fiscal Year    Fiscal Year   Three Months    Fiscal Year
                                                          Ended          Ended         Ended           Ended
                                                       February 3,    January 29,   January 30,     October 31,
                                                          2001            2000          1999           1998
                                                       --------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                   <C>                <C>          <C>              <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes                      $ (72,518)         $9,397       $2,953           $18,375
                                                       ========================================================

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                                      $47,946         $34,637       $4,959           $20,466
   Portion of rent expense representing interest           5,871           4,730          715             2,920
                                                       --------------------------------------------------------

Total fixed charges                                      $53,817         $39,367       $5,674           $23,386
                                                       ========================================================

Income (loss) before income taxes and fixed charges    $ (18,701)        $48,764       $8,627           $41,761
                                                       ========================================================

Ratio (deficiency) of earnings to fixed charges        $ (72,518)           1.2x         1.5x              1.8x
                                                       ========================================================

</TABLE>
Motion Granted and Abatement Order Filed September 2, 2021 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00083-CR

____________

KENIA LASHAN WILKINS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1536960

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel. Appellant’s brief was 

initially due March 25, 2021, but she was granted multiple extensions enabling her 

to file a timely brief on or before July 13, 2021. Appellant did not provide a brief 

on that date and this court issued a notice of late brief accordingly.

On August 2, 2021, appellant filed the motion to abate appeal currently 

before this court. That motion seeks relief based on the fact that a ruling 
2

addressing a motion to suppress, centering on a statement made by the appellant,

was not included in the clerk’s record or in findings of fact and conclusions of law 

signed by the trial court on February 22, 2021. According to the motion, this

requires the creation of a supplemental clerk’s record including the findings of fact 

and conclusions of law signed by the trial court on February 22, 2021, as well as 

supplemental or amended findings of fact and conclusions of law reflecting the 

trial court’s ruling on the motion to suppress.

Although we conclude the discrepancies in the court record warrant abating 

this appeal, it is concerning that roughly five months passed between when the trial 

court issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law and when appellant’s 

counsel noticed there were issues requiring an abatement. It appears appellant’s 

counsel had ample opportunity to detect the issues underlying the abatement 

request well before the present time and possibly eliminate the need for the

abatement altogether. Appellant’s motion does not provide any information 

explaining how counsel only identified those discrepancies several months after 

the findings of fact and conclusions of law were provided. Even so, as appellant’s 

motion indicates this is the final action needed before being able to fully litigate 

this appeal, this court finds the motion meritorious and hereby grants the motion.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket pending supplementation of the clerk’s record for this appeal. The 

Harris County Clerk is instructed to provide a supplemental clerk’s record, 

containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law signed by the trial court on 

February 22, 2021 and supplemental or amended findings of fact signed by the trial 

court addressing objections and rulings made regarding the motion to suppress the 

defendant’s statement, within 21 days of the date of this order. Appellant shall file 
3

her brief no later than 21 days after the supplemental clerk’s record has been 

provided. No further extensions will be granted to appellant to file a brief absent 

exceptional circumstances.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0874. DEREK LEE THOMAS v. BARNES LAND AND INVESTMENTS

et al.

On October 9, 2020, the trial court issued an order granting summary judgment

to the defendants on all claims asserted by the plaintiff, Derek Lee Thomas. Thomas

then filed several motions, including a “motion in arrest of judgment, or in the

[alternate], motion for new trial,” a motion to set aside the summary judgment order,

and a motion to construe the motion for new trial as a timely filed notice of appeal or

a motion for leave to file an out-of-time appeal. Thomas eventually filed a notice of

appeal of the October 9, 2020 order, but we dismissed the appeal as untimely. See

Case No. A21A1609 (Jul. 8, 2021). After remittitur, the trial court entered an order

dismissing and denying Thomas’ motions on October 27, 2021. Thomasthen filed an

application for discretionary appeal of the October 27, 2021 order as well as a notice

of appeal of the October 9, 2020 and October 27, 2021 orders. We denied the

application. See Case No. A22D0151 (Dec. 15, 2021). This is the direct appeal. We

lack jurisdiction.

ThisCourt’s denial of Thomas’ discretionary application constitutes a decision

on the merits. See Elrod v. Sunflower Meadows Dev., LLC, 322 Ga. App. 666, 670

(4) (745 SE2d 846) (2013) (“[W]hen thisCourt examines a request for a discretionary

appeal, it acts in an error-correcting mode such that a denial of the application is on

the merits, and the order denying the application is res judicata with respect to the

substance of the requested review.”) (punctuation omitted). Thus, Thomas’ direct

appeal of the October 27, 2021 order is barred. See Northwest Social & Civic Club

v. Franklin, 276 Ga. 859, 860 (583 SE2d 858) (2003); Hook v. Bergen, 286 Ga. App.

March 17, 2022
258, 261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007).

Thomas is also not entitled to additional appellate review of the October 9,

2020 order. “Our determination in the earlier appeal isresjudicata; the instant appeal

is therefore barred, and we are without jurisdiction to review the same matter for a

second time.” Echols v. State, 243 Ga. App. 775, 776 (534 SE2d 464) (2000);see also

Massey v. Massey, 294 Ga. 163, 165 (2) (751 SE2d 330) (2013) (“[A] party is not

entitled to a second appeal from a single order.”). 

We thus lack jurisdiction to consider this direct appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/17/2022
#### Oscar Alexandre MENDEZ-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-73131.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 21, 2011.

Oscar Alexandre Mendez-Martinez, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Anthony John Messuri, Esquire, Trial, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Oscar Alexandre Mendez-Martinez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions *647pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, *Cerezo v. Mukasey,*512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir.2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing statutes and regulations, *Simeonov v. Ashcroft,*371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir.2004). We review for substantial evidence factual findings. *Barrios v. Holder,*581 F.3d 849, 854 (9th Cir.2009). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Mendez-Martinez failed to demonstrate that he is eligible for asylum and withholding of removal based on his membership in a particular social group. *See id.*at 855-56 (petitioner who resisted gang recruitment did not establish persecution on account of a protected ground); *Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,*542 F.3d 738, 745-47 (9th Cir.2008). Accordingly, Mendez-Martinez’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Barrios,*581 F.3d at 856.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Mendez-Martinez did not establish a likelihood of being tortured in El Salvador by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. *See Santos-Lemus,*542 F.3d at 747-48. Mendez-Martinez’s contention that the IJ applied the wrong legal standard concerning his CAT claim is belied by the record.

Finally, Mendez-Martinez’s claim that the BIA erred because it did not comment on the arguments in his brief fails. *See Najmabadi v. Holder,*597 F.3d 983, 990-91 (9th Cir.2010); *Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring error and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC17-86-001.
    Applicants: Green Mountain Power Corporation.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Circumstances of 
Green Mountain Power Corporation.
    Filed Date: 10/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20171013-5187.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: EC17-109-000.
    Applicants: ALLETE, Inc., ALLETE Clean Energy, Inc.
    Description: Response of ALLETE, Inc., et al. to September 15, 2017 
letter requesting additional information.
    Filed Date: 10/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20171013-5184.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/3/17.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1923-003; ER10-2334-004; ER12-1924-003; ER11-
3406-004; ER11-3407-004; ER10-2897-006; ER12-1865-005; ER12-1925-003.
    Applicants: Big Savage, LLC, Big Sky Wind, LLC, EverPower 
Commercial Services LLC, Highland North LLC, Howard Wind LLC, Krayn 
Wind LLC, Mustang Hills, LLC, Patton Wind Farm, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to June 30, 2017 Triennial Market Power 
Update for the Northeast Region of the EverPower Companies.
    Filed Date: 10/12/17.
    Accession Number: 20171012-5153.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/2/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1456-004; ER11-4634-004; ER17-436-002; ER17-
437-004; ER15-1457-004.
    Applicants: Beaver Falls, L.L.C., Hazleton Generation LLC, Marcus 
Hook Energy, L.P., Marcus Hook 50, L.P., Syracuse, L.L.C.
    Description: Supplement to June 30, 2017 Triennial Market Power 
Update for the Northeast Region of Beaver Falls, L.L.C., et al.
    Filed Date: 10/12/17.
    Accession Number: 20171012-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/2/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: October 16, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-22888 Filed 10-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3224 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3224

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to 
   plan, design, and construct a vehicle maintenance building at the 
 vehicle maintenance branch of the Smithsonian Institution located in 
              Suitland, Maryland, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING, SUITLAND, MARYLAND.

    (a) Authority To Plan, Design, and Construct.--The Board of Regents 
of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized to plan, design, and 
construct a vehicle maintenance building at the vehicle maintenance 
branch of the Smithsonian Institution located in Suitland, Maryland.
    (b) Purpose of Building.--The purpose of the building shall be to 
provide a facility to be used for housing, maintaining, and repairing 
vehicles and transportation equipment of the Smithsonian Institution.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act 
$4,000,000 for fiscal year 2010.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3224

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to 
   plan, design, and construct a vehicle maintenance building at the 
 vehicle maintenance branch of the Smithsonian Institution located in 
              Suitland, Maryland, and for other purposes.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation of public hearing.

# SUMMARY:

The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure has been canceled: Appellate Rules Hearing on November 9, 2017, in Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Rules Committee Secretary, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Announcement for this hearing was previously published in 82 FR 37610.

Dated: October 12, 2017.

Rebecca A. Womeldorf,

Rules Committee Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-22480 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P