alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of Boston Restaurant Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge andbelief, that:

 

(1)           The Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended April 27, 2003 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Form10-K fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: July  25, 2003 |   /s/  George R. Chapdelaine |   |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | George R.  Chapdelaine                      |
|                  | President  and Chief Executive Officer      |

 

----

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of Boston Restaurant Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge andbelief, that:

 

(1)           The Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended April 27, 2003 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Form10-K fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: July  25, 2003 |   /s/  Fran V. Ross         |   |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Fran V. Ross  Chief Financial Officer |

 

2

----
___________

No. 96-1101

___________

Jeffrey E. Schenk, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

United States of America, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: August 28, 1996

 Filed: November 12, 1996

___________

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey E. Schenk was found guilty of illegally possessing and

distributing LSD, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. When he

committed these offenses, Schenk was on parole for a federal offense,

having previously been transferred from a federal prison camp to a

community corrections center; his parole was consequently revoked and he

was ordered "continued to expiration." The District Court sentenced Schenk

to concurrent terms of 186 months imprisonment on the drug counts and 96

months on the firearm count, and we affirmed. United States v. Schenk, 983

F.2d 876, 877 (8th Cir. 1993).

Schenk then filed this motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994),

contending the District Court failed to order that he serve his sentence

concurrently with an undischarged term of imprisonment, see U. S.

Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.3 (imposition of sentence on defendant

subject to undischarged term of imprisonment), and claiming that his

counsel was ineffective in
The Honorable Edward L. Fillipine, United States District

1

Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and

recommendation of the Honorable Lawrence O. Davis, United States

Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

 The District Court granted Schenk section 2255 relief on

2

other grounds, not relevant here, reducing Schenk's drug-related

sentences to 120 months.

-2-

failing properly to raise this issue at sentencing and on appeal. The

District Court concluded Schenk had not shown he had been prejudiced by

1

any deficiency of his counsel and denied relief, noting that it had

sentenced Schenk "with the intention that [the sentence] run consecutively

with the previously undischarged term of imprisonment that he was

serving." Schenk appeals. 2

Reviewing the denial of Schenk's section 2255 motion de novo, we

affirm as the motion, files, and records conclusively show he is not

entitled to relief. See Arnold v. United States, 63 F.3d 708, 709 (8th

Cir. 1995) (standard of review). Even assuming counsel's failure to raise

the section 5G1.3 issue was unreasonable, Schenk was not prejudiced by this

omission, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 691-92 (1984),

because application note 6 to current section 5G1.3 expressly governs a

situation like Schenk's and makes it clear that the District Court was

correct in declining to order that Schenk serve his sentence concurrently

with his undischarged term of imprisonment. Although this application note

was not added until November 1995, Appendix C Amendment 494 suggests it is

a clarifier and therefore may be used retroactively.

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of R&G Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
undersigned's best knowledge and belief:

      (a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated this 14th day of August, 2003.

                                                R&G Financial Corporation
                                                ------------------------------
                                                ("Company")


                                                /s/ Victor J. Galan
                                                ------------------------
                                                Victor J. Galan
                                                Chief Executive Officer


                                                /s/ Joseph R. Sandoval
                                                ------------------------
                                                Joseph R. Sandoval
                                                Chief Financial Officer


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
|   | 1. | The      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,      2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic      Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;    and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of      the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the      Company for the period covered by the Periodic  Report. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/   Peter A.      Michel                                    |   | /s/   Lincoln      Zehr                                       |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                         |   |                                                                         |
|         Peter      A. Michel         |   |         Lincoln      Zehr            |
|         Chief      Executive Officer |   |         Chief      Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Intermost
Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation (the “Company”) with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), the undersigned, Chia Hsun Wu, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, that to the best of his
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





This certification is being provided
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is
it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.


Date: November
      12, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      Chia Hsun WuChia
      Hsun WuChief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15342 and #15343; US VIRGIN ISLANDS Disaster Number VI-00012]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the US Virgin Islands (FEMA-4340-DR), dated 10/05/2017. *Incident:*
                         Hurricane Maria. *Incident Period:*
                         09/16/2017 and continuing.
 DATES: Issued on 10/05/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/04/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/05/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 10/05/2017, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Saint Croix, Saint John, Saint Thomas. 
 
 The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 153428 and for economic injury is 153430. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Rafaela Monchek, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2017-22332 Filed 10-13-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2676

CHARLES E. TERRY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FAIRFAX OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-324-A)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 2, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles E. Terry, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Christine Hope Perdue,

Elizabeth Childers Smith, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, McLean, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles E. Terry, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in his employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Terry v. Fairfax

Opportunities Unlimited, Inc., No. CA-97-324-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 31,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 202 2

- 2 806 LT Case No

. 20 2 0

- CF

- 0 01273

____________________________ R AMARIE A RCHIBALD , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________
On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County

. Mary P. Hatcher , Judge

. Markus X. Murden, of MXM Law, Orlando, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Da niel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. August 20 , 2024
P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. E DWARDS , C.J., and E ISNAUGLE and M AC I VER , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
#### In the Matter of Julia R., an Infant. Orleans County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Stacee L., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[860 NYS2d 362]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Orleans County (James P Punch, J.), entered April 30, 2007 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order, insofar as appealed from, adjudged that respondent Stacee L. had neglected her child and placed the child in the care and custody of petitioner for a period of one year.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it concerned placement is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, respondent mother appeals from an order that, inter alia, adjudicated her child to be neglected and placed the *1311child in the care and custody of petitioner. Under the circumstances of this case, we reject, the mother’s contention that the error of Family Court in failing to comply with the procedural requirements set forth in Family Court Act § 1033-b (1) (b) warrants reversal *(see Matter of Shawndalaya II.,*31 AD3d 823, 825 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 714 [2006]; *Matter of Stephanie A.,*224 AD2d 1027, 1028 [1996], *lv denied*88 NY2d 814 [1996]). The record establishes that the mother did not move to withdraw her consent to the entry of “an order of fact-finding [of neglect] without admission,” and we thus further conclude that she is precluded from challenging the court’s acceptance of her consent on the ground that the court failed to give the warnings required by Family Court Act § 1051 (f) *(see Matter of Nasir H.,*251 AD2d 1010 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 809 [1998]). Further, the record does not support the contention of the mother that her consent to the entry of the order of fact-finding was the result of duress *(see Matter of Andresha G.,*251 AD2d 1005 [1998]; *see also Matter of Cadejah AA.,*25 AD3d 1027, 1028 [2006] , *lv denied*7 NY3d 705 [2006]). Finally, we dismiss as moot the mother’s appeal from that part of the order placing the child in the care and custody of petitioner for a period of one year because that one-year placement has expired *(see Matter of Amber C.,*38 AD3d 538, 539 [2007], *lv denied*8 NY3d 816 [2007] ; *Matter of Abbi M.,*37 AD3d 1084 [2007]). Present— Martoche, J.P, Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Green, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of Paragon Real Estate Equity and Investment
Trust (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 (the Report) with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, James C. Mastandrea, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President and I, John J. Dee, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. PARAGON REAL ESTATE
EQUITY AND INVESTMENT TRUSTBy:
    
    /s/ James C. MastandreaDate: February 17, 2005
    
    
    
    James C. MastandreaChairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentPARAGON REAL ESTATE EQUITY AND INVESTMENT TRUSTBy:
    
    /s/ John J. DeeDate: February 17, 2005
    
    
    
    John J. DeeChief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
Exhibit 23

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Cascade Financial Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-94456) dated July 10, 1995 on Form S-8 and in the registration statements
(No. 333-32272 and No. 333-97929) on Form S-8 of Cascade Financial Corporation
of our report dated February 28, 2005 relating to the consolidated balance
sheet of Cascade Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2004, and
our report dated April 14, 2005, with respect to Cascade Financial Corporation
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which report is included in this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of
Cascade Financial Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Everett, Washington
April 25, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 96-7579 ARTHUR FRANK HARRISON, JR., Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CR-92-68, CA-96-72-BO) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 25, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Arthur Frank Harrison, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: Arthur Frank Harrison, convicted by a jury of numerous firearms offenses, now appeals the district court's denial of his motion filedunder 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), in which Harrison raised several claims relating to his entrapment defense, and claimed ineffective assistance of his privately retained trial counsel. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. First, the claims Harrison raises which relate to his entrapment defense have been previously raised on direct appeal and decidedadversely to Harrison. Accordingly, the district court properly dismissed those claims. See Boeckenhaupt v. United States , 537 F.2d 1182, 1183 (4th Cir. 1976). In addition, this Court reviewed the evidence of Harrison's guilt in his direct appeal, and found it to be overwhelming. United States v. Harrison , 37 F.3d 133 (4th Cir. 1994). Given this, we find that Harrison has not demonstrated prejudice required by Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687, 691-94 (1984), and therefore cannot obtain relief from his conviction based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Finally, Harrison's claim that the district court erred by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing is without merit. In many instances it is appropriate for the sentencing judge to dispose of a§ 2255 motion based on his memory, Blackledge v. Allison , 431 U.S. 63, 74 n.4 (1977), however, the district court in this case went a step further by expanding the record to include affidavits. See Raines v. United States , 423 F.2d 526, 529-30 (4th Cir. 1970). We find that a hearingwas not necessary because the record conclusively shows that Harrison was not entitled to relief. See Fontaine v. United States , 411 U.S. 213, 215 (1973). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2