alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      38,024,017
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      25,492,897
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            50,232,035
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                908,753,950
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      30,051,729
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        30,092,737
<LOANS>                                  1,370,660,871
<ALLOWANCE>                                  9,010,119
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,653,746,891
<DEPOSITS>                               1,270,212,256
<SHORT-TERM>                             1,097,011,752
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         41,103,558
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 50,000,000
<COMMON>                                    42,118,795
<OTHER-SE>                                 153,300,530
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           2,653,746,891
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             84,865,117
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           24,924,366
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             5,979,216
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           115,768,699
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          38,273,209
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          74,202,391
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       41,566,308
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                3,400,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           (816,781)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             42,937,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             42,626,614
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  42,626,614
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                33,077,181
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.47
<LOANS-NON>                                 51,741,298
<LOANS-PAST>                                   391,031
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             54,415,735
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             8,055,432
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                3,039,001
<RECOVERIES>                                   593,688
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            9,010,119
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         9,010,119
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jorge Lopez, Appellant.

[987 NYS2d 266]

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered September 13, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sexual act in the first degree.

*1191Defendant allegedly subjected a 10-year-old girl to numerous sexual acts. He was charged in a multicount indictment and eventually entered an *Alford*plea to criminal sexual act in the first degree and waived his right to appeal. He was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement and now appeals contending that he did not receive proper notice *(see*CPL 710.30) regarding some of the statements that County Court ruled were admissible following a *Huntley*hearing.

We affirm. The record reflects that defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, voluntary and intelligent and it specifically encompassed County Court’s decision on motions. Accordingly, review of County Court’s ruling regarding the admissibility of defendant’s statements is precluded by his waiver of his right to appeal *(see e.g. People v Junior,*97 AD3d 984, 985 [2012], *lv denied*19 NY3d 1103 [2012]; *People v Irvis,*301 AD2d 782, 783 [2003], *lv denied*99 NY2d 655 [2003]; *People v Jackson,*245 AD2d 964, 964-965 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 926 [1998]).

Peters, PJ., McCarthy, Garry and Devine, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                                        

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-88140, 33-88142, 33-88144, 33-88146, 33-81011,
333-37359, 333-43185, and 333-47759) and Form S-3 (No. 333-59785) of JP
Foodservice, Inc. of our report dated August 2, 1996, except as to Note 16,
which is as of September 10, 1996 and except as to the pooling of interests with
Valley Industries, Inc. and with Squeri Food Service, Inc., which is as of
November 14, 1996, which appears on page F-5 of U.S. Foodservice (formerly JP
Foodservice, Inc.) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 27, 1998.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Linthicum, Maryland
September 21, 1998
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Quick-Med Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Ladd Greeno, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(a)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Dated:  February 16, 2010                                                                  /s/  J.
Ladd Greeno


J. Ladd Greeno


Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Executive Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jeremy Raye LINCOLN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20481

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jeremy Raye Lincoln, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jeremy Raye Lincoln has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Lincoln has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Lincoln’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the- claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” *United States v. Cantwell,*470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Lincoln’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*
      *3795th Cir. R. 42.2. Lincoln’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  March 10, 2011 | /s/ Weiqiu Dong                          |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                             | Weiqiu Dong                              |
|                             | Chief Financial Officer                  |
|                             | (Chief Accounting and Financial Officer) |

----
THE COURT OFAPPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OFWASHINGTON, 

### ) No. 79415.-9-I 

### ) Respondent, 

### ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION v. 

### )

) TIMOTHY HARRIS, 

### )

Appellant. 

### ) FILED: 

### MAR 1 6 2020 PER CURIAM

—Timothy Harris appeals his convictions forfirst degree rape and first degree robbery. He contends, and the State concedes, thatthe convictions must be reversed because thejurywas instructed on an uncharged alternative means of committing each crime, and because the errorwas not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. In addition, Harris contends, and the State concedes, thatthe mandatoryjoinder rule precludes the State from charging the previously uncharged alternative means in any new charging document on remand. We accept the concession of errorand
reverse and remand forfurther proceedings consistent with this opinion.


# 3 ~a1v,1 

## ~4tr
EXHIBIT 23.2








                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



        We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  registration
statement of  MidAmerican  Energy  Company on Form S-3 (File No.  333-15387) and
Form S-8 (File No.  2-85102) of our report dated January 23, 1998, on our audits
of the  consolidated  financial  statements of MidAmerican  Energy Company as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and
1995, which report is included in this Form 10-K.





                                             /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
                                             ----------------------------
                                                 COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.





Kansas City, Missouri
March 20, 1998
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

EDWARD KABLAOUI and

NANCY KABLAOUI

,

Plaintiff s Below

, Appellant s

,

v.

GERAR PLACE CONDOMINIUM

ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Defendants Below

, Appellee s

. §

§

§ No. 2 1 , 2023

§

§ Court Below

— Court of Chancery

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ C.A. No. 2021

- 0700

§

§

§

§

§

Submitted: August 9 , 2023

Decided: August 16 , 2023

Before VALIHURA

, TRAYNOR , and GRIFFITHS

, Justices.

OR DER

On this 16 th day of August 2023 , the Court having considered this

matter on the briefs filed by the parties and having determined that the final judgment

of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons

assigned by the Court of Chancery in its ruling d ated December 21, 2022.

NOW, THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of

Chancery is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths

Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          38,467
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,951
<PP&E>                                           4,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,773
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,199
<SALES>                                          1,106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,118
<CGS>                                              490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,539
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,136)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,136)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.42)


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GARY GONZALEZ

,

Appellant,

v.

IONE GRIMM

,

Ap p ellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 3

- 00326

- CV

Appeal from the

171 st Judicial District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 2008

- 3847 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appe llee ’ s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until

October 27

, 2014

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE

APPELLEE ’ S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Albert A rmendar iz, Jr. , the Appellee ’ s Attorney,

prepare the Appellee ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before October 27 , 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22 nd day of September , 2014

.

PER CURIAM
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22-0600 JUN 0 6 6.11.1 SALVATRICE MUSCLE,

Plaintiffand Appellant,
v. ANTONIO SANTIN, M.D.,

Defendant and Appellee. Bowen C.iruenwuoci Clerk of Supreme court Stato of Montana ORDER

On May 5, 2023, we ordered Appellant Salvatrice Muscle to file a report on the statusofthisappeal no later thanJune 1, 2023. Musclehas compliedand informsthe Court that the court reporter who is preparing the transcript has been unable to complete the transcription due to workload and due to missing or unavailable audio recordings from the last day ofthe District Court trial. Muscle indicates that the transcripts ofthe existing recordings should be completed by early July and she requests this Court set a briefing schedule based on that expectation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file, and serve the opening brief on or before August 31, 2023. A11 further briefing deadlines shall be as provided in M. R. App. P. 13(1). The Clerk is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord. DATED this 

# t, day ofJune, 2023. For the Court,

ChiefJustice 06/06/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0600
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





REQUIRED
BY RULE 13A - 14(A) OR RULE 15D - 14(A)





I,
  Adam Radly, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





1.
  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Edgetech
Services Inc.





2.
  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:





(a)
 Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





(b)
 Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
 Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and





5. 
The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control    over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):





(a) 
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





(b)
 Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.





Date:
   June 15, 2009 / s/   Adam Radly


Chief
Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Clinical Trial Planning Grant (R34) and Implementation Cooperative Agreement (U01).                    

*Date:*                         November 6-9, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Geetanjali Bansal, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, Room 3G49, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC 9834, Bethesda, MD 20892-9834, (240) 669-5073,                         *geetanjali.bansal@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 10, 2017.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-22259 Filed 10-13-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P