# Patent

## Title
Increased ethanol production in recombinant bacteria

## Abstract

The invention pertains to a recombinant bacterium with enhanced ethanol production characteristics when cultivated in a growth medium comprising glycerol. The recombinant bacterium comprises an inserted heterologous gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase, and/or an up-regulated native gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase. Particularly there is provided the recombinant bacterium BG1G1 of the Thermoanaerobacter mathranii species with an inserted heterologous gene encoding the E.C. 1.1.1.6 type, a NAD dependent glycerol dehydrogenase obtained from Thermotoga maritima.

## Background
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
The present application is a U.S. national phase of PCT/EP2009/059421 filed on Jul. 22, 2009 (“PCT application”), which claims priority from European Application No. 08161066.9 filed on Jul. 24, 2008 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/100,504 filed on Sep. 26, 2008, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety into the present application. The PCT application, incorporated by reference herein, includes any amendments entered in the PCT application.


TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to recombinant bacteria with increased ethanol production capabilities when cultivated in media comprising glycerol. The recombinant bacteria comprise an inserted heterologous gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase, and/or an up-regulated native gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
World ethanol production totalled 46 billion litres in 2005 and is rapidly increasing (EU commission, 2006). The production of ethanol can be either from starch or sugar, which primarily consist of glucose or from lignocellulosic material such as wood, straw, grass, or agricultural and household waste products. The main constituents of lignocellulosic material are the polymers cellulose and hemicellulose. While cellulose is a rather homogenous polymer of glucose, the hemicellulose is a much more complex structure of different pentoses and hexoses. The complex composition of hemicellulose requires different means of pre-treatment of the biomass to release the sugars and also different fermenting organisms. To produce ethanol by fermentation a microorganism able to convert sugars into ethanol rapidly and with very high ethanol yields is required. Traditionally, organisms such as the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae or the bacterium Zymomonas mobilis have been used, but these organisms have limitations especially when it comes to fermentation of the pentose sugars from hemicellulose and the risk of contamination.
Lignocellulosic material is the most abundant source of carbohydrate on earth, and the second most important sugar in this biomass is xylose—a pentose sugar. If production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass is to be economically favourable, then all sugars must be used, including pentoses.
Thermophilic anaerobic bacteria have proven to be promising candidates for production of ethanol from lignocellulosic materials (WO 2007/134607). The primary advantages are their broad substrate specificities and high natural production of ethanol. Moreover, ethanol fermentation at high temperatures (55-70° C.) has many advantages over mesophilic fermentation. One important advantage is the minimization of the problem of contamination in continuous cultures, since only few microorganisms are able to grow at such high temperatures.
WO 2007/053600A describes how close to stoichiometric yields of ethanol from glucose and xylose can be obtained by deleting the genes coding for lactate dehydrogenase, phosphotransacetylase and acetate kinase in Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum. However, this approach may not be applicable in thermophilic organisms having multiple phosphotransacetylase and acetate kinase genes and does not facilitate utilization of glycerol.
Ethanol yield is of great importance for the production economy of bioethanol, since increased income can be obtained without an increase in biomass price or production costs. For Escherichia coli it has been shown that once the enzyme levels and substrate are no longer limiting, cofactor availability and the ratio of the reduced to oxidized form of the cofactor can become limiting for alcohol yield (Berrios-Rivera et al., 2002).
It has been shown that addition of glycerol to the growth medium of certain Clostridia can increase the production of alcohols (Vasconcelos et al., 1994). However, optimal alcohol production was achieved at a glycerol/glucose ratio of 2, and glycerol is therefore considered to be a major expense.
A glycerol dehydrogenase gene has been introduced into Escherichia coli to promote the production of 1,2-propanediol (Berrios-Rivera et al., 2003) and into Clostridium acetobutylicum to promote production of 1,3-propanediol (Gonzalez-Pajuelo et al., 2006). In both cases the glycerol dehydrogenase is in the direct pathway to the produced propanediol, and no production of propanediol occurs without the presence of the gene. The major function of the glycerol dehydrogenase is not to change the redox balance of the cell, but rather to provide a new pathway.
It is therefore one object of the present invention to provide recombinant bacteria, in particular thermophilic anaerobic bacteria, with increased ethanol production capabilities which are capable of overcoming the above mentioned obstacles.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, the present invention pertains to a recombinant bacterium having enhanced ethanol production characteristics when cultivated in a growth medium comprising glycerol. The recombinant bacterium comprises an inserted heterologous gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase, and/or an up-regulated native gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase.
The invention further relates to a method for producing ethanol, by culturing a bacterium according to the invention said method comprising the steps of culturing a bacterium according to the invention in a growth medium comprising glycerol and a polysaccharide source under suitable conditions.
Finally, there is provided a method for producing a recombinant bacterium having enhanced ethanol production characteristics when cultivated in a growth medium comprising glycerol, wherein the method comprises transforming a parental bacterium by the insertion of a heterologous gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase, and/or up-regulating a native gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase; and obtaining the recombinant bacterium.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
FIG. 1. Model of anaerobic metabolism in thermophilic anaerobic ethanol producing bacteria and diagram illustrating the native cofactor independent upper part of glycolysis pathway and the newly introduced NAD+ dependent glycerol degradation pathway. —Original NAD+ independent pathway, ---- Newly added NAD+ dependent pathway, XIM=Xylose isomerase, XK=Xylose kinase, PP pathway=pentose phosphate pathway, GLDH=Glycerol dehydrogenase, DhaK=Dihydroxyacetone kinase, TPI=Triosephosphate isomerase. LDH=Lactate dehydrogenase, PFOR=Pyruvate-ferredoxin oxidoreductase, PTA=Phosphotransacetylase, AK=Acetate kinase, ALDH=Acetaldehyde dehydrogenase, PDC=Pyruvate decarboxylase, ADH=Alcohol dehydrogenase.
FIG. 2. Schematic presentation of the linear DNA fragment used for replacement of the lactate dehydrogenase of Thermoanaerobacter BG1 with a kanamycin resistance cassette and the glycerol dehydrogenase of Thermotoga maritima. Upstream ldh and downstream ldh represents the 725 bp and 630 bp regions upstream and downstream of the lactate dehydrogenase of BG1. Pxyl is the promoter transcribing the gldh gene.
FIG. 3. PCR analysis of two independent BG1G1 clones. A) PCR on chromosomal DNA from BG1, BG1L1, and two BG1G1 clones using external lactate dehydrogenase region primers. B) Restriction analyses of the fragments shown in A using restriction enzymes EcoRI (upper part) and PstI (lower part).
FIG. 4. Product yield of BG1G1 compared to the parent strain BG1, and to the parent strain with a lactate dehydrogenase deletion (BG1L1, DSM Accession number 18283). Fermentations were performed in batch.
FIG. 5. Product yield of five independent clones of BG1G1 compared to the parent strain with a lactate dehydrogenase deletion (BG1L1). Fermentations were performed in batch.
FIG. 6. Ratio of ethanol over acetate produced by two independent clones of BG1G1 as a function of concentration of glycerol in the growth medium.
FIG. 7. Concentrations of different compounds in the influent (open symbols) and inside the reactor (closed symbols) from a continuous fermentation of mixtures of xylose and glycerol in an upflow reactor.
FIG. 8 illustrates the sugar conversion and the ethanol yield (g/g) in the continuous fermentation.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention pertains to recombinant bacteria with enhanced ethanol production characteristics. More specifically it has been found that ethanol production characteristics for bacteria, when cultivated in growth media comprising glycerol, can be significantly enhanced by the insertion of a heterologous gene coding for glycerol dehydrogenase and/or by up-regulation of an already existing native gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase.
In the present context the term “ethanol” is to be understood as a straight-chain alcohol with the molecular formula C2H5OH. Ethanol is also commonly referred to as “ethyl alcohol”, “grain alcohol” and “drinking alcohol”. An often used alternative notation for ethanol is CH3—CH2—OH, which indicates that the carbon of a methyl group (CH3—) is attached to the carbon of a methylene group (—CH2—), which is attached to the oxygen of a hydroxyl group (—OH). A widely used acronym for ethanol is EtOH.
Glycerol is a chemical compound that is available on the world market at a reasonable cost. In the present context the term “glycerol” is intended to mean a chemical compound with the general formula HOCH2CH(OH)CH2OH. Glycerol is a colourless, odourless, viscous liquid and is widely used in pharmaceutical formulations. Glycerol is also commonly called glycerin or glycerine, it is a sugar alcohol, and is sweet-tasting and of low toxicity. Glycerol is a 10% by-product of biodiesel production and the price of glycerol has dramatically decreased during the last few years due to the increasing production of biodiesel. As the production of biodiesel is increasing exponentially, the glycerol generated from the transesterification of plant oils is also generated in increasing amounts. Another source of glycerol is the yeast based ethanol fermentations. Thus, the increasing production of starch based ethanol will also lead to increasing availability of glycerol.
The bacteria according to invention comprises, as described above, an inserted heterologous gene and/or an up-regulated native gene encoding a glycerol dehydrogenase. A number of useful enzymes having glycerol dehydrogenase activity are known in the art. In presently preferred embodiments the glycerol dehydrogenase is selected from glycerol dehydrogenase (E.C 1.1.1.6); Glycerol dehydrogenase (NADP(+)) (E.C. 1.1.1.72); Glycerol 2-dehydrogenase (NADP(+)) (E.C. 1.1.1.156); and Glycerol dehydrogenase (acceptor) (E.C. 1.1.99.22).
Useful genes encoding the above mentioned glycerol dehydrogenases may be derived from a number of different sources such as microorganisms, including fungi and bacteria, and animal cells, such as mammalian cells and insect cells.
In a presently preferred embodiment the glycerol dehydrogenase is, as mentioned above, of the E.C. 1.1.1.6 type, i.e. a NAD dependent glycerol dehydrogenase (alternative name “NAD-linked glycerol dehydrogenase”) which catalyses the reaction: Glycerol+NAD(+)<=>glycerone+NADH. Genes encoding the E.C. 1.1.1.6 type, i.e. a NAD dependent glycerol dehydrogenase may be obtained from a bacterium of the Thermotoga group of bacteria such as Thermotoga maritima. 
In other embodiments the glycerol dehydrogenase gene is derived from a bacterium belonging to the Geobacillus group of bacteria, such as Geobacillus stearothermophilus. It is also contemplated that useful glycerol dehydrogenase genes may be derived from other bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Clostridium botulinum, Vibrio vulnificus, Clorobium ferrooxidans, Geobacter Lovleyi, Ruminococcus gnavus, Bacillus coagulans, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Citrobacter koseri, Shigella boydii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Clostridium butyricum, Vibrio sp., and Serratia proteamaculans. Useful genes encoding a number of E.C. 1.1.1.6 type glycerol dehydrogenases are shown in the accompanying sequence listing (SEQ ID NOs 1-17).
Accordingly, the heterologous gene encoding an E.C. 1.1.1.6 type glycerol dehydrogenase may in useful embodiments be selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16 and SEQ ID NO:17.
Methods for the preparation and the incorporation of these genes into microorganisms are well known in the art, for example from Sambrook & Russell “Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual” (Third Edition), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press which i.a. describes how genes may be inserted, deleted or substantially inactivated using suitable gene manipulation tools and genetic engineering procedures.
Chromosomal integration of foreign genes may offer several advantages over plasmid-based constructions. Accordingly, the heterologous glycerol dehydrogenase gene may in accordance with the invention be incorporated into the chromosome of the bacterium. In certain embodiments, the heterologous glycerol dehydrogenase gene is inserted into a lactate dehydrogenase encoding region of said bacterium. In further embodiments the heterologous gene encoding a glycerol dehydrogenase is inserted into a phosphotransacetylase encoding region of the bacterium according to the invention. In yet further embodiments, the heterologous glycerol dehydrogenase gene is inserted into an acetate kinase encoding region of said bacterium.
The heterologous gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase may be operably linked to an inducible, a regulated or a constitutive promoter. In useful embodiments the promoter is a xylose inducible promoter.
Up-regulation of gen-expression is a process which occurs within a cell triggered by a signal (originating internal or external to the cell) which results in increased expression of one or more genes and as a result the protein(s) encoded by those genes. Thus, it is also within the scope of the invention that the recombinant bacterium may be obtained by transforming a parental bacterium by up-regulating an already present native gene in the parental bacterium which encodes a glycerol dehydrogenase. A number of methods and systems for up-regulation of genes are well known in the art, i.a. inducible systems in which the system is off unless there is the presence of an inducer molecule that allows for gene expression. A well known system is the Lac operon which consists of three adjacent structural genes, a promoter, a terminator, and an operator. The lac operon is regulated by several factors including the availability of glucose and of lactose.
In a specific embodiment, the heterologous gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase, and/or the up-regulated native gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase over-expressed on a multicopy plasmid.
The bacteria selected for modification are said to be “wild-type”, i.e. they are not laboratory-produced mutants (also referred to in the present context as “parental bacteria” and “parental non-recombinant bacteria”). The wild-type bacteria may be isolated from environmental samples expected to contain useful ethanol producing bacterial species. Isolated wild-type bacteria will have the ability to produce ethanol but, unmodified, with a relatively low yield. The isolates may in useful embodiments be selected for their ability to grow on hexose and/or pentose sugars, and oligomers thereof, at thermophilic temperatures.
The selected wild-type bacteria and the resulting recombinant bacteria of the invention, may be cultured under conventional culture conditions, depending on the bacteria chosen. The choice of substrates, temperature, pH and other growth conditions can be selected based on known culture requirements.
However, as will be seen from the following examples, the present invention is particular well-suited for improving ethanol yields in thermophilic recombinant bacteria. Thus, the recombinant bacterial strains according to the invention are preferably thermophilic bacteria.
Recombinant bacteria according to the invention that are capable of operating at this high temperature are particularly is of high importance in the conversion of the lignocellulosic material into fermentation products. The conversion rate of carbohydrates into e.g. ethanol is much faster when conducted at high temperatures. For example, ethanol productivity in a thermophilic Bacillus is up to ten-fold faster than a conventional yeast fermentation process which operates at 30° C. Consequently, a smaller production plant is required for a given volumetric productivity, thereby reducing plant construction costs. As also mentioned previously, at high temperature, there is a reduced risk of contamination from other microorganisms, resulting in less downtime, increased plant productivity and a lower energy requirement for feedstock sterilisation. The high operation temperature may also facilitate the subsequent recovery of the resulting fermentation products.
Hence, in preferred embodiments the recombinant bacterium is capable of growing at a temperature in the range of about 40-95° C., such as the range of about 50-90° C., including the range of about 60-85° C., such as the range of about 65-75° C.
The wild-type bacteria used for preparing the recombinant bacteria according to the invention may be any suitable ethanol producing bacteria, but it is preferred if the bacterium is derived from the division of Firmicutes and in particular from the class of Clostridia.
As mentioned above the present invention is particularly suitable for improving ethanol yields in ethanol producing thermophilic bacteria, and as will be apparent from the following examples, particularly in thermophilic bacteria which are anaerobic bacteria, i.e. bacteria which do not require oxygen for their growth. Thus, the bacteria may in useful embodiments be obligate anaerobes which are bacteria that will die when exposed to atmospheric levels of oxygen. They may also be facultative anaerobes which can use oxygen when it is present, or aerotolerant bacteria which can survive in the presence of oxygen, but are anaerobic because they do not use oxygen as a terminal electron acceptor.
In particular it is preferred if the bacterium is from the class of Clostridia, in particular thermophilic anaerobic bacteria from the order of Thermoanaerobacteriales, such as from the family of Thermoanaerobacteriaceae, including the genus of Thermoanaerobacter. 
Thus, in accordance with the invention, the bacterium of the genus Thermoanaerobacter may be selected from the group consisting of Thermoanaerobacter acetoethylicus, Thermoanaerobacter brockii, Thermoanaerobacter brockii subsp. brockii, Thermoanaerobacter brockii subsp. finnii, Thermoanaerobacter brockii subsp. lactiethylicus, Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus, Thermoanaerobacter finnii, Thermoanaerobacter italicus, Thermoanaerobacter kivui, Thermoanaerobacter lacticus, Thermoanaerobacter mathranii, Thermoanaerobacter pacificus, Thermoanaerobacter siderophilus, Thermoanaerobacter subterraneus, Thermoanaerobacter sulfurophilus, Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis, Thermoanaerobacter thermocopriae, Thermoanaerobacter thermohydrosulfuricus, Thermoanaerobacter wiegelii, Thermoanaerobacter yonseiensis. 
In certain embodiments, and as will be apparent from the following examples, the bacterium derived from Thermoanaerobacter mathranii may be selected from BG1 (DSMZ Accession number 18280) and mutants thereof. BG1 has previously been described in WO 2007/134607 and is known for its excellent ethanol production capabilities. It is demonstrated in WO 2007/134607, that the base strain BG1 in advantageous embodiments may be modified in order to obtain mutants or derivatives of BG1, with improved characteristics. Thus, in one embodiment the recombinant bacteria according to the invention is a variant or mutant of BG1 wherein one or more genes have been inserted, deleted or substantially inactivated.
As seen in the following examples, it was found by the present inventors, that the ethanol producing capability of BG1 may be significantly increased by insertion of a glycerol dehydrogenase from Thermotoga maritima under the control of a xylose inducible promoter into the lactate dehydrogenase region, thereby removing the lactate dehydrogenase gene. The resulting recombinant bacterium was termed BG1BG1.
Thus, in a presently preferred embodiment the recombinant bacterium is Thermoanaerobacter mathranii strain BG1G1 which has been deposited in accordance with the terms of the Budapest Treaty on 23 Mar. 2007 with DSMZ—Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen and Zellkulturen GmbH, Mascheroder Weg 1b, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany under DSMZ accession number 19229.
As shown in the accompanying examples, the insertion of glycerol dehydrogenase leads to a significant NAD+ specific glycerol dehydrogenase activity in extracts from BG1BG1 grown on glucose, in contrast to the wild type bacterium BG1 where no activity is detected.
It was found that not only does BG1BG1 produce close to theoretical yields of ethanol, it also consumes a significant proportion of the added glycerol, thereby enabling production of ethanol from substrates where glycerol is present at less than 50% of the sugar concentration. Since glycerol is typically produced at ethanol production facilities, use of this product could be very favourable. Glycerol could also be purchased from biodiesel production facilities where crude glycerol is available in large amounts. Since only small amounts of glycerol are necessary to enhance ethanol production, a significant amount of impurities in the glycerol can be tolerated.
It is also observed that the ethanol yield of BG1BG1 increases by at least 36% as compared to wild-type BG1 and 15% as compared to a mutant where the lactate dehydrogenase has been deleted without insertion of a glycerol dehydrogenase. It is shown that the expression of the glycerol dehydrogenase is instrumental in this increase in ethanol yield, since no glycerol dehydrogenase enzyme activity or increased yield is observed when the strain is grown in the absence of xylose, where the promoter is not active and the glycerol dehydrogenase gene therefore not expressed.
The following examples also illustrate that in certain embodiments a minimum concentration of 40% (w/w) of glycerol relative to xylose is necessary to obtain the effect, and that an increase of up to 400% (w/w) does not significantly influence the yield. This shows that a large variation in glycerol concentrations can be tolerated, which is of importance for the operational stability if the strains are to be used industrially.
The ethanol yields of wild-type ethanol producing bacteria may in accordance with invention be improved significantly. Thus, in a preferred embodiment there is provided a recombinant bacterium wherein the ethanol production characteristics are enhanced by at least 5%, such as at least 10%, such as at least 15%, such as at least 20%, such as at least 25%, such as at least 30%, such as at least 35%, such as at least 40%, such as at least 45%, such as at least 50%, such as at least 55%, such as at least 60%, such as at least 65%, such as at least 70%, such as at least 75%, such as at least 80%, such as at least 85%, such as at least 90%, such as at least 95%, such as at least 100%, such as at least 150% and such as at least 200%, as compared to a corresponding wild-type bacterium (parental non-recombinant bacterium).
The recombinant bacteria of the invention are, as mentioned above, cultivated in a growth medium comprising glycerol. The exact amount or concentration of glycerol may vary significantly, and it is well within the capability of the skilled person to optimise the ethanol yield by varying the glycerol concentration. In specific embodiments the bacteria are cultivated in a growth medium comprising glycerol in an amount of at least 0.1 g/L, such as at least 0.5 g/L, such as at least 1 g/L, such as at least 2 g/L, such as at least 3 g/L, such as at least 4 g/L, such as at least 5 g/L, such as at least 6 g/L, such as at least 7 g/L, such as at least 8 g/L, such as at least 9 g/L, such as at least 10 g/L, such as at least 15 g/L, and such as at least 20 g/L.
In further embodiments of the invention, the growth medium comprises glycerol in an amount in the range of 1 to 10 g/L, such as the range of 1-8 g/L, such as the range of 1-5 g/L, such as the range of 1-4 g/L.
In some variants, the growth medium comprises carbohydrates selected from the group consisting of monosaccharides, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides.
In some interesting embodiments, one or more additional genes have been inserted and/or deleted in the bacterium.
It may for certain embodiments be desired to insert one or more additional genes into the recombinant bacteria according to the invention. Thus, in order to improve the ethanol yield or the yield of another specific fermentation product, it may be beneficial to insert one or more genes encoding a polysaccharase into the strain according to the invention. Hence, in specific embodiments there is provided a strain according to the invention wherein one or more genes encoding a polysaccharase which is selected from cellulases (EC 3.2.1.4); beta-glucanases, including glucan-1,3 beta-glucosidases (exo-1,3 beta-glucanases, EC 3.2.1.58), 1,4-beta-cellobiohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.91) and endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanases (EC 3.2.1.6); xylanases, including endo-1,4-beta-xylanases (EC 3.2.1.8) and xylan 1,4-beta-xylosidase (EC 3.2.1.37); pectinases (EC 3.2.1.15); alpha-glucuronidase, alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase (EC 3.2.1.55), acetylesterase (EC 3.1.1.-), acetylxylanesterase (EC 3.1.1.72), alpha amylase (EC 3.2.1.1), beta-amylase (EC 3.2.1.2), glucoamylase (EC 3.2.1.3), pullulanase (EC 3.2.1.41), beta-glucanase (EC 3.2.1.73), hemicellulase, arabinosidase, mannanases including mannan endo-1,4-beta-mannosidase (EC 3.2.1.78) and mannan endo-1,6-alpha-mannosidase (EC 3.2.1.101), pectin hydrolase, polygalacturonase (EC 3.2.1.15), exopolygalacturonase (EC 3.2.1.67) and pectate lyase (EC 4.2.2.2).
Depending on the desired fermentation product, it is contemplated that in certain embodiments it is useful to insert heterologous genes encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase (such as EC 4.1.1.1) or to insert a heterologous gene encoding an alcohol dehydrogenase (such as EC 1.1.1.1, EC 1.1.1.2, EC 1.1.1.71, or EC 1.1.99.8) or to up- or down-regulate an already existing gene (native gene) such as a gene encoding alcohol dehydrogenase.
It is also contemplated that it may be useful in certain embodiments to delete one or more genes encoding phosphotransacetylase and/or acetate kinase.
In one variant of the bacterium of the invention, one or more genes encoding an alcohol dehydrogenase has been inserted. In another variant of the bacterium of the invention, one or more genes encoding a phosphotransacetylase has been deleted. In still another variant of the bacterium of the invention, one or more genes encoding an acetate kinase has been deleted. In still another variant of the bacterium of the invention, one or more additional genes have been up-regulated and/or down-regulated.
It should be understood that the before-mentioned modifications may be combined.
The present invention also provides for an effective method for producing ethanol, comprising culturing a bacterium according to the invention in a growth medium comprising glycerol and a carbohydrate source under suitable conditions.
The carbohydrate source serves as the substrate for the recombinant bacteria according to the invention. In the present context the term “carbohydrate source” is intended to include chemical compounds having the general chemical formula Cn(H2O)n. Thus, the term “carbohydrate” includes monosaccharides, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides as well as substances derived from monosaccharides by reduction of the carbonyl group (alditols, including sugar alcohols such as glycerol, mannitol, sorbitol, xylitol and lactitol, and mixtures thereof), by oxidation of one or more terminal groups to carboxylic acids, or by replacement of one or more hydroxy group(s) by a hydrogen atom, an amino group, a thiol group or similar heteroatomic groups. It also includes derivatives of these compounds.
The generic term “monosaccharide” (as opposed to oligosaccharide or polysaccharide) denotes a single unit, without glycosidic connection to other such units. It includes aldoses, dialdoses, aldoketoses, ketoses and diketoses, as well as deoxy sugars and amino sugars, and their derivatives, provided that the parent compound has a (potential) carbonyl group. The term “sugar” is frequently applied to monosaccharides and lower oligosaccharides. Typical examples are glucose, fructose, xylose, arabinose, galactose and mannose.
“Oligosaccharides” are compounds in which monosaccharide units are joined by glycosidic linkages. According to the number of units, they are called disaccharides, trisaccharides, tetrasaccharides, pentasaccharides etc. The borderline with polysaccharides cannot be drawn strictly; however the term “oligosaccharide” is commonly used to refer to a defined structure as opposed to a polymer of unspecified length or a homologous mixture. Examples are sucrose and lactose.
“Polysaccharides” is the name given to a macromolecule consisting of a large number of monosaccharide residues joined to each other by glycosidic linkages.
In a presently preferred embodiment, the recombinant bacterium according to the invention is cultivated in the presence of a polysaccharide source selected from starch, glucose, lignocellulose, cellulose, hemicellulose, glycogen, xylan, glucuronoxylan, arabinoxylan, arabinogalactan, glucomannan, xyloglucan, and galactomannan.
Ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass (i.e. plant materials) has attracted widespread attention as an unlimited low cost renewable source of energy for transportation fuels. Because the raw material cost accounts for more than 30% of the production costs, economically, it is essential that all major sugars present in lignocellulosic biomass are fermented into ethanol. The major fermentable sugars derived from hydrolysis of various lignocellulosic materials are glucose and xylose. Microorganisms currently used for industrial ethanol production from starch materials, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zymomonas mobilis, are unable naturally to metabolize xylose and other pentose sugars. Considerable effort has been made in the last 20 years in the development of recombinant hexose/pentose-fermenting microorganisms for fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose sugars, however, a common problem with genetically engineered ethanologens is co-fermentation of glucose with other sugars, known as “glucose repression” i.e. sequential sugar utilization, xylose conversion starts only after glucose depletion, resulting in “xylose sparing” i.e. incompletely xylose fermentation. Co-fermentation of glucose and xylose is therefore a crucial step in reducing ethanol production cost from lignocellulosic raw materials. Thermophilic anaerobic bacteria have the unique trait of being able to ferment the whole diversity of monomeric sugars present in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. In addition, the industrial use of thermophilic microorganisms for fuel ethanol production offers many potential advantages including high bioconversion rates, low risk of contamination, cost savings via mixing, cooling and facilitated product recovery. These microorganisms are, however, sensitive to high ethanol concentrations and produce low ethanol yields at high substrate concentrations.
As will be apparent from the following examples, the recombinant thermophilic bacterium BG1BG1 of the present invention is capable of producing ethanol on very high dry-matter concentrations of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. In the present context the term “lignocellulosic hydrolysate” is intended to designate a lignocellulosic biomass which has been subjected to a pre-treatment step whereby lignocellulosic material has been at least partially separated into cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin thereby having increased the surface area of the material. Useful lignocellulosic material may, in accordance with the invention, be derived from plant material, such as straw, hay, garden refuse, house-hold waste, wood, fruit hulls, seed hulls, corn hulls, oat hulls, soy hulls, corn fibres, stovers, milkweed pods, leaves, seeds, fruit, grass, wood, paper, algae, cotton, hemp, flax, jute, ramie, kapok, bagasse, mash, distillers grains, oil palm, corn, sugar cane and sugar beet.
In some embodiments, the lignocellulosic biomass material is present in the liquid growth medium at a dry-matter content of at least 10% wt/wt, such as at least 15% wt/wt, including at least 20% wt/wt, such as at least 25% wt/wt, including at least 35% wt/wt.
In further embodiments of the method of the invention, the lignocellulosic biomass material has been subjected to a pre-treatment step selected from acid hydrolysis, steam explosion, wet oxidation, wet explosion and enzymatic hydrolysis.
The pre-treatment method most often used is acid hydrolysis, where the lignocellulosic material is subjected to an acid such as sulphuric acid whereby the sugar polymers cellulose and hemicellulose are partly or completely hydrolysed to their constituent sugar monomers. Another type of lignocellulose hydrolysis is steam explosion, a process comprising heating of the lignocellulosic material by steam injection to a temperature of 190-230° C. A third method is wet oxidation wherein the material is treated with oxygen at 150-185° C. The pre-treatments can be followed by enzymatic hydrolysis to complete the release of sugar monomers. This pre-treatment step results in the hydrolysis of cellulose into glucose while hemicellulose is transformed into the pentoses xylose and arabinose and the hexoses glucose, galactose and mannose. The pre-treatment step may in certain embodiments be supplemented with treatment resulting in further hydrolysis of the cellulose and hemicellulose. The purpose of such an additional hydrolysis treatment is to hydrolyse oligosaccharide and possibly polysaccharide species produced during the acid hydrolysis, wet oxidation, or steam explosion of cellulose and/or hemicellulose origin to form fermentable sugars (e.g. glucose, xylose and possibly other monosaccharides). Such further treatments may be either chemical or enzymatic. Chemical hydrolysis is typically achieved by treatment with an acid, such as treatment with aqueous sulphuric acid, at a temperature in the range of about 100-150° C. Enzymatic hydrolysis is typically performed by treatment with one or more appropriate carbohydrase enzymes such as cellulases, glucosidases and hemicellulases including xylanases.
It was surprisingly found that the recombinant bacterial strain BG1BG1 according to invention is capable of growing in a medium comprising a hydrolysed lignocellulosic biomass material having a dry-matter content of at least 10% wt/wt, such as at least 15% wt/wt, including at least 20% wt/wt, and even as high as at least 25% wt/wt. This has the great advantage that it may not be necessary to dilute the hydrolysate before the fermentation process, and thereby it is possible to obtain higher concentrations of ethanol, and thereby the costs for subsequently recovering the ethanol may be decreased (distillation costs for ethanol will increase with decreasing concentrations of alcohol).
The method of producing ethanol according to invention comprises cultivating the recombinant bacterium in the presence of glycerol. Thus, in preferred embodiments the method comprises cultivating the bacteria in a growth medium comprising glycerol in an amount of at least 0.1 g/L, such as at least 0.5 g/L, such as at least 1 g/L, such as at least 2 g/L, such as at least 3 g/L, such as at least 4 g/L, such as at least 5 g/L, such as at least 6 g/L, such as at least 7 g/L, such as at least 8 g/L, such as at least 9 g/L, such as at least 10 g/L, such as at least 15 g/L, and such as at least 20 g/L. In further embodiments of the invention, the growth medium comprises glycerol in an amount in the range of 1 to 10 g/L, such as the range of 1-8 g/L, such as the range of 1-5 g/L, such as the range of 1-4 g/L.
As shown in the examples, the method in accordance with the invention may in certain embodiments be a fermentation process performed under strict anaerobic conditions, i.e. conditions where no oxygen is present.
The fermentation process may in useful embodiments be conducted in a bioreactor which is operated using a number of different modes of operation, such as batch fermentation, fed batch fermentation or continuous fermentation. The continuous fermentation process may e.g. be performed using a continuous stirred-tank reactor or a continuous upflow reactor.
It may be is of great industrial importance that the ethanol production can run in a continuous operation mode, since downtime due to new start up can be very costly. As shown in the examples, BG1G1 was run in continuous operation mode with ethanol yields as high as 0.47 g ethanol per g substrate (xylose and glycerol) corresponding to 92% of the theoretical maximum yield based on the metabolic pathways of Clostridia. If instead the yield is based solely on the sugar substrate xylose and glycerol is regarded an addition, the maximal yield is 0.55 g ethanol per g xylose corresponding to 108%. This shows the great potential of using recombinant bacteria of the invention for production of ethanol if a favourable source of ethanol is present.
As previously mentioned the recombinant bacterial strain according to the invention may in useful embodiments be a thermophilic bacterium. As shown in the accompanying examples the recombinant bacteria BG1BG1 is a thermophilic and strict anaerobic bacteria which is capable of growing at high temperatures even at or above 70° C. The fact that the strain is capable of operating at this high temperature is of high importance in the conversion of the ligocellulosic material into fermentation products. The conversion rate of carbohydrates into e.g. ethanol is much faster when conducted at high temperatures. For example, ethanol productivity in a thermophilic Bacillus is up to ten-fold faster than a conventional yeast fermentation process which operates at 30° C. Consequently, a smaller production plant is required for a given volumetric productivity, thereby reducing plant construction costs. As also mentioned previously, at high temperature, there is a reduced risk of contamination from other microorganisms, resulting in less downtime, increased plant productivity and a lower energy requirement for feedstock sterilisation. The high operation temperature may also facilitate the subsequent recovery of the resulting fermentation products.
Accordingly, the ethanol production method according to the invention is preferably operated at a temperature in the range of about 40-95° C., such as the range of about 50-90° C., including the range of about 60-85° C., such as the range of about 65-75° C.
The method according to invention may further comprise an ethanol recovering step. A number of techniques for ethanol recovery from fermentation broths are known, and these include distillation (e.g. vacuum distillation), solvent extraction (gasoline may e.g. be used as a solvent for the direct extraction of ethanol from a fermentation broth), pervaporation (a combination of membrane permeation and evaporation) and the use of hydrophobic adsorbents.
It is further contemplated that the method according to the invention may further comprise a step wherein surplus glycerol is converted to biogas (e.g. methane generated) which may subsequently be used for generating energy such as heating and electricity.
In accordance with the invention, there is also provided a method for producing a recombinant bacterium having enhanced ethanol production characteristics when cultivated in a growth medium comprising glycerol. The method for producing the recombinant bacterium comprises the steps of transforming a wild-type (parental bacterium) by the insertion of a heterologous gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase or by up-regulating and already existing native gene of the wild-type bacterium encoding glycerol dehydrogenase. It is also within the scope of the invention to both insert a heterologous gene and up-regulate a native gene in the same bacterium. The method further comprises the steps of obtaining the recombinant bacterium.
EXAMPLES
Materials and Methods
The following materials and methods were applied in the below Examples:
Strains and Growth Conditions
Strain BG1 was isolated anaerobically from an Icelandic hot-spring at 70° C. All strains were cultured at 70° C. anaerobically in minimal medium (BA) with 2 g/L yeast extract as in (Larsen et al., 1997) unless otherwise stated. For solid medium, roll tubes (Hungate R E, 1969; Bryant M P, 1972) containing BA medium with 11 g/L phytagel and additional 3.8 g/L MgCl2.6H2O was used. For cloning purposes, Escherichia coli Top10 (Invitrogen, USA) was used. Top10 was routinely cultivated at 37° C. in Luria-Bertani medium (Ausubel et al., 1997) supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin when needed.
Wet oxidized straw material was prepared using the wet oxidation pretreatment method described by Bjerre et al. (Bjerre et al., 1996) at a concentration of 20% dry solids. The material was added trace metals and vitamins as in BA medium and diluted in water to the final concentration.
Fermentation
All fermentation experiments were performed as batch fermentations under strictly anaerobic conditions using 10% (v/v) inoculum. 10 mL of BA media supplemented with 5 g/L glucose/xylose and 2.5 g/L glycerol was used unless otherwise stated. The cultures were grown at 70° C. and the samples were collected after 48 h of growth.
For continuous fermentation in upflow reactors, medium was prepared and supplemented with the same minerals, trace metals, and yeast extract as described above unless otherwise stated. The initial pH of the medium was adjusted to 7.4-7.7 and it was autoclaved at 120° C. for 30 min. To ensure anaerobic conditions, medium was flushed for 45 minutes with a mixture of N2/CO2 (4:1), and finally Na2S was injected into the bottle to give a final concentration of 0.25 g/L.
The reactor was a water-jacketed glass column with 4.2 cm inner diameter and 20 cm height. The working volume of the reactor was 200 mL. The influent entered from the bottom of the reactor and the feeding was controlled by a peristaltic pump (Model 503S-10 rpm, Watson Marlow, Falmouth, UK). Recirculation flow was achieved by using an identical peristaltic pump (Model 503-50 rpm, Watson Marlow, Falmouth, UK), with a degree of recirculation to ensure up-flow velocities in the reactor of 1 m/h. The pH was maintained at 7.0 by addition of NaOH (1-2 M), unless otherwise stated. The reactor was loaded with 75 mL of sterilized granular sludge originating from the UASB reactor at Faxe waste water treatment plant (Denmark), and finally the entire reactor system, including the tubing and recirculation reservoir, was autoclaved at 120° C. for 30 min. Before use, the reactor system was gassed for 15 minutes with N2/CO2 (4:1) to ensure anaerobic conditions and filled with BA medium with initial xylose and glycerol concentrations of 17.5 g/L and 9.7 g/L. The reactor was started up in batch mode by inoculation with 10 mL of cell suspension with an optical density (OD578) of 0.9-1. The batch mode of operation was maintained for 48 hours to allow cells to attach and to immobilize on the carrier matrix. After the batch run, the system was switched to continuous mode applying a HRT of 24 hours and an up-flow velocity of 1 m/h.
Analytical Methods
The strains were grown in BA medium without antibiotics in batch for 24-48 hours as stated.
The culture supernatants were analyzed for cellobiose, glucose, xylose, acetate, lactate and ethanol using an organic acid analysis column (Aminex HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA USA)) on HPLC at 65° C. with 4 mM H2SO4 as eluent. The ethanol and acetate measurements were validated using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. Mixed sugars were measured on HPLC using a Phenomenex, RCM Monosaccharide (00H-0130-K0) column at 80° C. with water as eluent. Mannose and arabinose could not be distinguished using this setup and were therefore tested in separate cultures. Hydrogen was measured using a GC82 Gas chromatograph (MikroLab Aarhus, Denmark).
Enzymes and Reagents
If not stated otherwise enzymes were supplied by MBI Fermentas (Germany) and used according to the suppliers' recommendations. PCR reactions were performed with a 1 unit:1 unit mixture of Taq polymerase and Pfu polymerase. Chemicals were of molecular grade and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Sweden AB.
Construction of the Gldh Gene Insertion Cassette
The DNA fragment used for insertion of the glycerol dehydrogenase gene from Thermotoga maritima into the lactate dehydroganse region of BG1 is shown in FIG. 2 and contains:
1) a DNA fragment upstream of the l-ldh gene of BG1, amplified using primers ldhup1F (SEQ ID NO:18; 5′-TTCCATATCTGTAAGTCCCGCTAAAG) and ldhup2R (SEQ ID NO:19; 5′-ATTAATACAATAGTTTTGACAAATCC),
2) a gene encoding a highly thermostable kanamycin resistance amplified from plasmid pUC18HTK (Hoseki et al., 1999),
3) an expression cassette composed of a promoter, the complete gldh open reading frame of Thermotoga maritima and a rho independent terminator, and
4) a DNA fragment downstream of the l-ldh gene of BG1, amplified using primers ldhdown3F (SEQ ID NO:20; 5′-ATATAAAAAGTCACAGTGTGAA) and ldhdown4R (SEQ ID NO:21; 5′-CACCTATTTTGCACTTTTTTTC). The plasmid p3CH was linearised and electroporated into BG1.
Glycerol Dehydrogenase Assay
The Gldh activity of the tested strain was determined as described below. The tested strains were cultivated in 100 mL of BA media with 5 g/L glucose/xylose and 2.5 g/L glycerol as growth substrate at 70° C. under anaerobic conditions. Cultures at an OD578 of  ̃0.5 were harvested by centrifugation of 50 mL of the culture at 40,000 rpm and 4° C. for 30 min. The pellet was resuspended in 2 mL of ice chilled extraction buffer composed of 50 mM Tris-HCL, 10% glycerol and 1 mM MgCl2 at pH 8.0. The cells were sonicated for 2 min in an ice bath (Digital Sonifier: Model 250; Branson Ultrasonics Corporation, Danbury, U.S.A.). The sonicated cells were centrifuged at 20,000 g and 4° C. for 30 min. The supernatant was used for Gldh activity assay at 70° C. and pH 8.0 using the continuous spectrophotometric rate determination method as previously described (Burton, R. M.; 1955). One unit was defined as the amount of enzyme that produced 1 μmol of NADH per minute at 70° C. and pH 8.0. Total concentration in the cell extracts was routinely measured by the Bradford method (Bradford, M. M., 1976) using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard.
Calculations
A significant loss of ethanol is observed when fermentations are performed at 70° C. with no condensation of the gas phase. To take this loss into account, the following formula was




  
    used
    ⁢
    
      
    
    ⁢
    
      CR
      ⁡
      
        (
        %
        )
      
    
  
  =
  
    
      
        
          3
          ⁢
          
            (
            
              
                
                  C
                  EtOH
                
                /
                
                  M
                  EtOH
                
              
              +
              
                
                  C
                  Ace
                
                /
                
                  M
                  Ace
                
              
            
            )
          
        
        +
        
          
            C
            BM
          
          /
          
            M
            BM
          
        
      
      
        
          5
          ⁢
          
            
              C
              Xyl
            
            /
            
              M
              Xyl
            
          
        
        +
        
          3
          ⁢
          
            
              C
              Gly
            
            /
            
              M
              Gly
            
          
        
      
    
    ×
    100
    ⁢
    
      :
    
  




where Ci is the concentration of compound i, i.e. substrate consumed or product produced (g/L) and M, is the molecular weight of compound i (g/mol). Lactic acid production was below the detection limit of 0.2 g/L and was therefore not included in the calculations. A biomass yield of 0.045 g/g was assumed based on experiments with thermophilic Clostridia (Desai et al., 2004; Lynd et al., 2001). For carbon recovery calculations it was assumed based on the Clostridial catabolism of xylose that 1 mole of CO2 is produced per mole of ethanol or acetate (Desai et al., 2004; Lynd et al., 2001). It is also assumed that no other products are formed. This assumption is reasonable, since a carbon recovery of close to 100% (SD±2%) is seen in closed batch fermentations, where no ethanol loss occurs.

Example 1
Construction of BG1 G1
The lactate dehydrogenase of BG1 was replaced by a kanamycin resistance gene and a glycerol dehydrogenase from Thermotoga maritima using the fragment shown in FIG. 2. The resulting clones were checked by PCR using primers annealing outside the region using for homologous recombination. In this way, ldh loci in which no recombination have taken place will also be amplified although the fragment will be of different length (FIG. 3A). The PCR fragments obtained were digested with the restriction enzymes EcoRI and PstI (FIG. 3B). The resulting fragments were found to be of the expected lengths, showing that pure correct clones had been obtained. To further confirm the identity of the clones, the PCR products were sequenced. The sequences were identical to the predicted sequences of the recombinant clones.
To confirm that a glycerol dehydrogenase had indeed been inserted under the control of the xylose isomerase promoter Pxyl, studies of glycerol dehydrogenase activity in cultures grown on glucose and xylose were performed. The results are shown in the below Table 1.







TABLE 1







Specific NAD+ dependent Gldh activity of


T. BG1 wild type and mutant strains of L1 and G1










Activity (U/mg)












Strain
Glucose
Xylose







BG1
ND
ND



BG1L1
ND
ND



BG1G1
ND
0.438 ± 0.04







Note.



One unit is defined as the amount of enzyme that produced 1 μmol of NADH per minute at 70° C. and pH 8.0. Values shown are average of triplicates from anaerobic cultures.



ND: not detected (less than 0.001 U/mg).






As Table 1 shows, no glycerol dehydrogenase activity was detected in wild type BG1 or in BG1L1 grown on glucose or xylose. Also, no glycerol dehydrogenase activity was detected when BG1G1 was grown on glucose, where the Pxyl promoter is repressed. Only when BG1G1 was grown on xylose, glycerol dehydrogenase activity was detected showing that the gene had been correctly inserted and that it was under the control of the Pxyl promoter.
BG1, BG1L1 and BG1G1 were grown on BA medium with 5 g/L xylose and 5 g/L glycerol in batch. When xylose is present in the medium, the Pxyl promoter transcribing the gldh gene will be active, and Gldh enzyme will be produced. The GLDH oxidizes the glycerol present in the medium to glycerone with concomitant reduction of NAD+ to NADH+H+. As can be seen from FIG. 4, BG1G1 has a significantly higher yield of ethanol under these conditions as compared to the wild type BG1 or the lactate dehydrogenase deficient mutant BG1L1.
The Increased Expression is Dependent on Expression of the Gldh Gene
FIG. 5 shows the ethanol yields of BG1L1 and five independent clones of BG1G1 grown on either glucose or xylose. When no xylose is present, the Pxyl promoter will not transcribe the gldh gene, and therefore much less GLDH protein will be present. GLDH enzyme assays supported this finding. As expected, ethanol yields were much lower when glucose was used as carbon source, showing that it is indeed the GLDH protein which is responsible for the increased ethanol yield.
Example 4
Optimization of Glycerol Concentration
FIG. 6 shows the ratio of ethanol to acetate produced in batch experiments with two independent clones of BG1G1 using xylose as carbon source and with varying concentrations of glycerol. As can be seen, the highest ethanol yields are obtained with glycerol concentrations from approximately 1 to 9 g/L of glycerol in the medium. At higher concentrations, lower ethanol yields are seen, probably due to stress caused by shortage of NAD+, which is necessary for glycolysis.
Example 5
Growth on Wet-Oxidized Wheat Straw
To test if BG1G1 was able to grow in the harsh conditions of wet-oxidized wheat straw (WOWS), batch experiments with up to 10% dry matter WOWS were performed. BG1G1 was able to grow at all concentrations of WOWS, showing that the strain had maintained the ability of BG1 to produce ethanol at high yields in this material. The highest ethanol to acetate ratio was 9.5 g/g.
Example 6
Growth of BG1G1 in Continuous Culture
Higher ethanol productivities can be obtained if continuous immobilized reactor systems are used. Furthermore, many thermophilic anaerobic bacteria have low tolerance to high sugar concentrations, a problem that can be overcome with the use of continuous fermentation systems. BG1G1 was grown in a continuous upflow reactor to show that high yields of ethanol could be produced in this type of reactor.
As FIG. 7 shows, steady state was obtained after 27 days at xylose and glycerol concentrations of 12.8 g/L and 7.2 g/L, respectively. At this stage almost all sugars were consumed and no lactic acid was detected. The highest ethanol yield, of 0.47 g ethanol per g of xylose and glycerol consumed, corresponding to 92% of the maximal theoretical yield, was observed after 32 days during growth on 12.8 g/L of xylose and 7.2 g/L of glycerol. If the ethanol yield is based solely on the consumed xylose, a yield of 0.55 g ethanol per g consumed xylose or 108% of the theoretical yield. Therefore, the introduction of the glycerol dehydrogenase not only increases the ethanol yield from the substrate sugars, it also enables the use of glycerol as a substrate. This clearly shows that using a strain which constitutively express a glycerol dehydrogenase is a clear advantage if glycerol can be purchased at a favourable price. Glycerol not consumed in the fermentation can favourably be converted to biogas, thereby further increasing value of the process. FIG. 8 illustrates the sugar conversion and the ethanol yield (g/g) in the continuous fermentation.

## Claims

1. A thermophilic recombinant bacterium comprising a heterologous gene encoding a glycerol dehydrogenase, wherein the heterologous gene encoding a glycerol dehydrogenase has been incorporated into the chromosome of the bacterium, and is inserted into:
a lactate dehydrogenase encoding region of said bacterium,
a phosphotransacetylase encoding region of said bacterium, or
an acetate kinase encoding region of said bacterium; and

wherein said heterologous gene encoding a glycerol dehydrogenase is obtained from the Thermotoga group or the Geobacillus group of bacteria.

2. A bacterium according to claim 1, wherein the inserted heterologous gene is encoding a glycerol dehydrogenase selected from the group consisting of Glycerol dehydrogenase (E.0 1.1.1.6); Glycerol dehydrogenase (NADP(+)) (E.C. 1.1.1.72); Glycerol 2-dehydrogenase (NADP(+)) (E.C. 1.1.1.156); and Glycerol dehydrogenase (acceptor) (E.C. 1.1.99.22).

3. A bacterium according to claim 1, wherein the heterologous gene encoding a glycerol dehydrogenase is obtained from the Thermotoga group of bacteria.

4. A bacterium according to claim 1, wherein the heterologous gene encoding a glycerol dehydrogenase is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16 and SEQ ID NO:17.

5. A bacterium according to claim 1, wherein the heterologous gene encoding a glycerol dehydrogenase is inserted into the lactate dehydrogenase encoding region of said bacterium.

6. A bacterium according to claim 1, wherein said heterologous gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase is operably linked to an inducible, a regulated or a constitutive promoter.

7. A bacterium according to claim 1, wherein the bacterium is obtained from the genus of Thermoanaerobacter.

8. A bacterium according to claim 7, which is obtained from the Thermoanaerobacter mathranii strain selected from BG1 G1(DSMZ Accession number 18280).

9. A bacterium according to claim 7, which is of the Thermoanaerobacter mathranii strain BG1G1 (DSMZ Accession number 19229).

10. A bacterium according to claim 1, having increased ethanol yield from xylose when cultivated in a growth medium comprising glycerol and xylose as compared to parental bacterium.

11. A method for producing ethanol, said method comprising the steps of culturing a bacterium according to claim 1 in a growth medium comprising glycerol and a carbohydrate source under suitable conditions, wherein the carbohydrate source is selected from the group consisting of a monosaccharide, an oligosaccharide and a polysaccharide.

12. A method according to claim 11, wherein the carbohydrate source is a polysaccharide selected from the group consisting of starch, lignocellulose, cellulose, hemicellulose, glycogen, xylan, glucuronoxylan, arabinoxylan, arabinogalactan, glucomannan, xyloglucan, and galactomannan.

13. A method according to claim 11, which is a fermentation process performed under strict anaerobic conditions.

14. A method according claim 11, which is a continuous fermentation process.

15. A method according to claim 11, wherein the growth medium comprises a concentration of 40% up to 400% (w/w) of glycerol relative to xylose.

16. A method for producing a recombinant bacterium having increased ethanol yield from xylose when cultivated in a growth medium comprising glycerol and xylose as compared to parental bacterium, said method comprising
(a) transforming a parental thermophilic bacterium by the insertion of a heterologous gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase into the chromosome of the bacterium; and
(b) obtaining said recombinant bacterium,
wherein said heterologous gene encoding a glycerol dehydrogenase has been inserted into:
a lactate dehydrogenase encoding region of said bacterium, a phosphotransacetylase encoding region of said bacterium, or
an acetate kinase encoding region of said bacterium; and

wherein said heterologous gene encoding a glycerol dehydrogenase is obtained from the Thermotoga group or the Geobacillus group of bacteria.