alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF CONDITION AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATION FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE
30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,140
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             574
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,375
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          25,334
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            24,895
<LOANS>                                        397,323
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 449,201
<DEPOSITS>                                     331,242
<SHORT-TERM>                                    25,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             13,062
<LONG-TERM>                                     41,041
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 449,201
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 33,293
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,054
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                35,347
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              16,961
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,863
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,484
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,271
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,719
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.70
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.680
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,639
<LOANS-PAST>                                       248
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,687
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       62
<RECOVERIES>                                         5
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,630
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,630
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,574


</TABLE>
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 

English Translation 

POWER OF ATTORNEY 
 Authorizer: Feng
Hailiang (“Shareholder”, “Pledgor”) 
 Authorized Person: Zhejiang Hailiang Education Consulting and Services Co., Ltd.
(“Pledgee”) 
 Pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement and the Equity Pledge Agreement entered into on December 31, 2013 between the
Authorizer and the Authorized Person, Mr. Feng Hailiang owns 100% of the equities of Zhejiang Hailiang Education Investment Co., Ltd. Mr. Feng Hailiang hereby issues this Power of Attorney, which shall become effective simultaneously with
the Consulting Services Agreement and the Equity Pledge Agreement on an irrevocable basis to confirm the controlling right of Zhejiang Hailiang Education Consulting and Services Co., Ltd. (“Hailiang Consulting”). 

Mr. Feng Hailiang irrevocably authorizes the person delegated by Hailiang Consulting (“Shareholder’s Representative”) to exercise the
following rights on his behalf: 
  

	1.	to excise the voting right of a shareholder or a director on behalf of Mr. Feng Hailiang, and all the voting results and resolutions passed by the Shareholder’s Representative or the board of directors shall
be acknowledged and confirmed by Mr. Feng Hailiang; 

  

	2.	to exercise all the shareholder’s rights provided by Zhejiang Hailiang Education Investment Co., Ltd., and the results shall be confirmed and acknowledged by Mr. Feng Hailiang; 


 

	3.	all shareholder rights of Zhejiang Hailiang Education Investment Co., Ltd. shall be exercised by Hailiang Consulting. Any dividends or other benefits associated with shareholding that the Pledgor receives from Zhejiang
Hailiang Education Investment Co., Ltd. will unconditionally revert to Hailiang Consulting; 

  

	4.	to act as a director of Zhejiang Hailiang Education Investment Co., Ltd. and constitute the board of directors to exercise the rights and duties of the board of directors pursuant to the articles of associations of
Zhejiang Hailiang Education Investment Co., Ltd.; 

  

	5.	to engage in the business permitted by the scope of business on behalf of Zhejiang Hailiang Education Investment Co., Ltd.; 

  

	6.	to determine the change or replacement of the member of board of directors of Zhejiang Hailiang Education Investment Co., Ltd. pursuant to the appointment, direction or suggestion of Hailiang Consulting;


  

	7.	to exercise other shareholder’s rights provided by the articles of associations of Zhejiang Hailiang Education Investment Co., Ltd. 


 

			
	Authorizer:	 	/s/ Feng Hailiang (Signature)
		 	Feng Hailiang
	
	Date: December 31, 2013



  
 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, November 2, 2017, 9:00 a.m. to November 2, 2017, 7:00 p.m., National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 22, 2017, 82 FR 44429.                

This meeting notice is amended to change the meeting date from November 2, 2017 to December 7, 2017. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 10, 2017.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-22245 Filed 10-13-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 7, 2016

a1130 

# Order

Clerk December 7, 2016

153904

RONALD W. LECH, II,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

- Appellee,

v SC: 153904

COA: 320028

Livingston CC: 08

- 024045

- CH

HUNTMORE ESTATES

CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,

Defendant/Counterplaintiff,

and

JACOBSON ORE CREEK LAND

DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., and SCOTT R.

JACOBSON, d/b/a S. R. JACOBSON

LAND DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.,

Defendants

- A ppellants.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 26, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 201 (Thursday, October 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48726-48727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22666]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Mathematical and Physical Sciences; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

[[Page 48727]]

    Name and Committee Code: Advisory Committee for Mathematical and 
Physical Sciences (#66).
    Date and Time:

November 16, 2017; 12:30 p.m.-5:15 p.m.
November 17, 2017; 8:30 a.m.-2:45 p.m.

    Place: National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., 
Alexandria, VA 22314.
    Meeting Information: https://www.nsf.gov/mps/advisory.jsp.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Tamara Savage, National Science Foundation, 2415 
Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5723362436213630321739243179303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff8b9e8c9e899e989abf918c99d1989089">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations, and counsel 
on major goals and policies pertaining to mathematical and physical 
sciences programs and activities.

Agenda

Thursday, November 16, 2017

<bullet> Meeting opening, FACA briefing, introductions, and approval of 
previous meeting minutes
<bullet> MPS updates
<bullet> Division updates
<bullet> More effective external partnerships, part 1
<bullet> Strategy discussion about Big Ideas
<bullet> Prep for meeting with the NSF Director and COO

Friday, November 17, 2017

<bullet> Meeting opening and FACA briefing
<bullet> More effective external partnerships, part 2
<bullet> Meeting with the NSF Director and COO
<bullet> Debrief and discussion on meeting with the NSF Director and 
COO
<bullet> Forming a sub-committee to assess the Physics Frontiers 
program
<bullet> Continued discussion about external partnerships and Big Ideas
<bullet> Wrap up and opportunity for public Q&A/comments

    Dated: October 16, 2017.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-22666 Filed 10-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael MADRIGAL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-30039.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 15, 2011.

Anthony G. Hall, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Kevin Thomas Maloney, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

J.D. Merris, Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rafael Madrigal appeals from: (1) his guilty-plea conviction and 130-month sentence for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a); (2) his guilty-plea conviction and concurrent 120-month sentence for unlawful possession of an unregistered firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841 and 5861(d); and (3) the order of forfeiture under 26 U.S.C. § 5872 and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). Pursuant to *Anders v. Califor*
      *719
      *nia,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Madrigal’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. A supplemental brief and answering brief have been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamone West, Also Known as Jason Bradford, Also Known as Mony, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 87]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that County Court erroneously instructed the jury on the defense of justification has not been preserved for our review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v McCray,*149 AD2d 736, *lv denied*74 NY2d 743). In any event, the justification charge as given was proper. *1088The verdict finding defendant guilty of felony murder (Penal Law § 125.25 [3]) and attempted robbery in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.15 [2]) is not contrary to the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). Die sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Smith, J.—Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.
SCWC-11-0000641

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

CINDY CHURAN KODAMA,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

ALAN HARUO KODAMA, 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. 

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-11-0000641; FC-D NO. 08-1-2862)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Alan Haruo Kodama’s

Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on April 15, 2015, is

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 22, 2015.

Peter Van Name Esser and

Edward R. Lebb

for petitioner

R. Steven Geshell

for respondent

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000641

22-MAY-2015

09:30 AM
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00299-CV

Chris Thompson and ETL Elite Landscape, Inc., Appellants

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GV-06-002459, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants’ brief was due on November 3, 2008. On December 15, 2008, this Court

notified the Appellants that their brief was overdue and that their failure to file a motion for

extension of time by December 29, 2008, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of

prosecution. To date, the Appellants have not responded to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, we

dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

 

 Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: February 6, 2009
#### Gary William HALLFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. MENDEZ; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-15381.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 18, 2011.

Gary William Hallford, Represa, CA, pro se.

Neah Huynh, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gary William Hallford, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging constitutional and state law violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *D-Beam Ltd. P’ship v. Roller Derby Skates, Inc.,*366 F.3d 972, 974 n. 2 (9th Cir.2004) (denial of motion to remand); *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000) (dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A). We affirm.

The district court properly denied Hall-ford’s motion to remand the action to state court because Hallford alleged in his complaint violations of his federal constitutional rights and, thus, the action was subject to removal, *see Lee v. Am. Nat’l Ins. Co.,*260 F.3d 997, 1002-03 & n. 5 (9th Cir. 2001), and Hallford failed to raise timely objections to any defects in the removal requirements, *see Vasquez v. N. Cnty. Transit Dist.,*292 F.3d 1049, 1062 (9th Cir.2002) (an objection to a defect in removal requirements must be made within thirty days of the filing of the removal notice or the objection is waived).

The district court properly dismissed Hallford’s amended complaint because Hallford failed to allege facts in support of his claims. *See Ashcroft v. Iqbal,*— U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, a plaintiff must allege more than “ ‘labels and conclusions’ ” or “ ‘naked assertion[s]’ ” in support of his claims (citation omitted)).

Hallford’s remaining contentions, including those concerning the Attorney General’s representation of defendants, are unpersuasive.

Hallford’s “Notice of Inquiry” is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

BODYMEDIA, INC.,

Appellant

v.

BASIS SCIENCE, INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1786

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 

95/002,371.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DAVID CLAY HOLLOWAY, Kilpatrick Townsend & 

Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also 

represented by RENAE WAINWRIGHT, ROBERT J. CURYLO,

MICHAEL S. PAVENTO. 

J. DAVID HADDEN, Fenwick & West, LLP, Mountain 

View, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by 

CAROLYN CHANG, AMY HAYDEN. 

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, LINN, and STOLL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 July 12, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
Exhibit 99.2 - Annual Report of Accountant Relative to Servicing.

                        Independent Accountants' Report


The Board of Directors
First North American National Bank:

We have examined management's assertion about First North American National
Bank's (FNANB) compliance, as Servicer, with Article III, subsection 3.4 (c) and
sections 3.2, 4.1 and 8.8 of the Amended and Restated Master Pooling and
Servicing Agreement, dated December 31, 2001, as amended (the Agreement),
between FNANB, as Servicer, Tyler International Funding, Inc., as Transferor,
and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, for the year ended
February 29, 2004, included in the accompanying Management Report. Management is
responsible for FNANB's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about FNANB's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about FNANB's
compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our opinion does not provide a
legal determination on FNANB's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that First North American National Bank
complied with the requirements of the aforementioned subsection and sections of
the Agreement for the year ended February, 29, 2004 is fairly stated, in all
material respects.


                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

April 19, 2004







                                Management Report

Management of First North American National Bank ("FNANB"), as Servicer, is
responsible for compliance with the servicing requirements in Article III,
subsection 3.4(c) and sections 3.2, 4.1 and 8.8 of the Amended and Restated
Master Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated December 31, 2001, as amended (the
"Agreement"), among Tyler International Funding, Inc., as Transferor, FNANB, as
Servicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (formerly known as Bankers
Trust Company), as Trustee, for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2004.

Management has performed an evaluation of FNANB's compliance with the
aforementioned subsection and sections of the Agreement for the fiscal year
ended February 29, 2004. Based upon this evaluation, management believes that,
during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2004, FNANB, as Servicer, was in
compliance with the aforementioned subsection and sections of the Agreement.




/s/  PHILIP J. DUNN
Philip J. Dunn
Vice President