T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. ERNEST O FI GU ER OA CHAV EZ , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 50367 D. C . No . 2 : 1 0 - c r - 0 1 0 8 3 - S VW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S t e phe n V . W i l s on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r15, 2013 ** B efo re: F IS H E R , G O U L D , an d B Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E rne s t o F i gue r oaC ha ve z appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta nd c h a lle n g e s h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n a n d f o u r - y e a rs e n te n c e f

o rc o n s p ir a c y to e nga ge i n the bus i ne s s of de a l i ng i n f

i r e a rm s w i thoutal i c e ns e , i n vi ol a t i on of 18 

# FI LED OC T 22 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 50367 2 U . S . C . §§ 371 a nd 3571( b) ( 3) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e a f f irm th e c o n v ic tio n b u t v a c a te a n d r e m a n d f o rr e s e n te n c in g . F i gu er oa C havez cont ends thathi s pl eaw as i nv al i d b ec ause the di stri ctcourt e rr e d b y a lle g e d ly f

a ilin g to a d v is e h im o f

th e f u ll im m ig r a tio n c o n s e q u e n c e s o f h is pl e a , i nc l udi ng apot e nt i a l 20- y e a rba rt o r e e ntry . T hi s a r gum e ntf a i l s be c aus e the d is tr ic t c o u rt h a s n o o b lig a tio n to m a k e th is a d v is e m e n t. See U ni ted Stat es v. D e l gado- R am os , 63 5 F . 3d 12 37 , 12 38 , 12 41 (9th C i r. 20 11 ) ( per c uri am ) ( di stri ct courtdo es no thave a duty “ t o i nform a def endantof the i m m i grat i on consequences of hi s pl e a ” ) . C ontr a ry t o F i gue r oaC ha ve z ’ s a r gum e nt , nothi ng i n Cha i dez v . U ni ted Stat es , 1 3 3 S . C t . 1 1 0 3 (2 0 1 3 ), u n d erm i n es D el g a do -R a m o s. F i gu er oa C havez nextcont ends thatthe di stri ctcourtcom m i tt ed procedural e rr ora ts e nt e nc i ng w he n i tf a i l e d t o c a l c ul a t e the G ui de l i ne s r a nge . W e r e vi e w f or p la in e rr o r . Se e U

ni te d State s v . W

akni ne , 543 F . 3d 546, 551 ( 9th C i r . 2008) . T he di stri ctcourt ’ s f

ai l ure t o cal cul at e the appl i cabl e G ui del i nes r ange const i tut ed

“ si gn i fi cantprocedural error. ” G al l v. U ni ted Stat es , 5 5 2 U .S . 3 8 , 5 1 ( 2 0 0 7 ) . B ec ause the cust od i al se nt ence here w as 21 m on ths abov e the t op of the advi sory G ui de l i ne s r a nge c a l c ul a t e d by the pr e s e nt e nc e r e port , w e c a nnotc onc l ude tha tthe c o u rtwo u l d h a v e i m p o s e d th e s a m e s e n t e n c e ab s e n tth e e rr o r . Ac c o r d i n g l y , we v a c a te th e s e n te n c e a n d r e m a n d f o rr e s e n te n c in g s o th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s a n a ly s is11- 50367 3 can p roce ed fr om “ an i ni t i al det erm i nat i on of the corre ctG ui del i nes r ange. ” U ni te d State s v . Munoz - Cam ar e na , 63 1 F . 3d 10 28 , 10 31 (9th C i r. 20 11 ) ( per c u r ia m ) ; s e e al

s o U ni te d State s v . H

am m ons , 55 8 F . 3d 11 00 , 11 05 -06 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 9 ) ( d is tr ic t c o u rt’s f

a ilu r e to c a lc u la te th e c o rr e c t G u id e lin e s r a n g e w a s p la in e rr o r ) . I n l i ghtof

ourde c i s i on, w e do notr e a c h F i gue r oaC ha ve z ’ s r e m a i ni ng chal l enges t o h i s s ent ence . A F F I R M E D i n p ar t ; V A C A T E D an d R E M A N D E D f or r e s e n t e n c i n g.