alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                               CENTRAL RENTS, INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
              FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
            AND FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 4, 1994 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1994

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                              (unaudited)
                                                                                                For the
                                                                                                Period
                                                                                                June 4
                                                                                                through
                                                                                              December 31,
                                                  1997            1996            1995            1994
                                                -------         -------         -------         -------

<S>                                             <C>             <C>             <C>           <C>
Fixed Charges:

     Interest expense                           $ 7,725         $ 7,725         $ 7,725         $ 4,442

     Amortization of deferred financing             163             330             316             156

     Amortization of debt discount                  274             274             274             157

     Rental expense (1)                           2,515           2,252           2,556           1,844
                                                -------         -------         -------         -------

     Total fixed charges                        $10,677         $10,581         $10,871         $ 6,599
                                                =======         =======         =======         =======

Income before fixed charges                     $ 7,876         $12,119         $16,716         $ 9,884
                                                =======         =======         =======         =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                    *            1.1x            1.5x            1.5x
                                                                =======         =======         =======
</TABLE>

* Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges for the year ended December
31, 1997. The additional earnings needed to cover fixed charges for this year
were $2,801.

(1) Rental expense imputed interest is calculated at one-third of total
operating lease costs in accordance with industry practices.

                                                                             39
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6108

SYLVESTER MOORE, Petitioner - Appellant, versusGEORGE HINKLE, Warden, Haynesville Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-00-1139-AM) Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jonathan Shapiro, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Eugene PaulMurphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Sylvester Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Hinkle , No. CA-00-1139- AM (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 19, 2000; entered Dec. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In Re: Pierre GENTRY, Petitioner.

No. 10-2248.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 2011.

Decided: March 17, 2011.

*307Pierre Gentry, Petitioner pro se.

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pierre Gentry petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for a new trial. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court recently entered a decision in the underlying action. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Gentry’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Salvador BRISENO-BENAVIDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-40554.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 24, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern Dis*369trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Salvador Briseno-Benavidez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). He appeals both his conviction and sentence.

Briseno maintains the district court erred by imposing a 16-level, crime-of-violence increase under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii), based on his prior Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation. Although *post-Booker,*the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory only, and an ultimate sentence is reviewed for reasonableness under an abuse-of-discretion standard, the district court must still properly calculate the guideline-sentencing range for use in deciding on the sentence to impose. *Gall v. United States,*— U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 586, 596, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). In that respect, its application of the guidelines is reviewed *de novo;*its factual findings, only for clear error. *E.g., United States v. Villegas,*404 F.3d 355, 359 (5th Cir.2005).

Briseno asserts the definition of habitation under Texas law is broader than the generic, contemporary meaning of dwelling as used in the enumerated offense of burglary of a dwelling in the Sentencing Guidelines. Although he acknowledges this court’s precedent to the contrary, Briseno asserts it has been overruled by the Supreme Court’s decision in *James v. United States,*— U.S. —, 127 S.Ct. 1586, 1599-1600, 167 L.Ed.2d 532 (2007). This contention is without merit; *James*did not involve an enumerated offense. *See United States v. Gomez-Guerra,*485 F.3d 301, 303 & n. 1 (5th Cir.2007). As a result, the district court did not err in determining that Briseno’s prior conviction was a crime of violence. *See United States v. Valdez-Maltos,*443 F.3d 910, 911 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 127 S.Ct. 265, 166 L.Ed.2d 205 (2006).

In the light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Briseno challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors, rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. This argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129255 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129255 

 COA: 259009 

Saginaw CC: 93-008476-FC 

KEITH TRENELL TAYLOR, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
Exhibit 99.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Form 10-Q for NetScreen Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert D. Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the quarter
covered by the Report.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    ROBERT D.
THOMASRobert D. Thomas President, Chief Executive Officer NetScreen
Technologies, Inc.Date:

May 14, 2003




This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to NetScreen Technologies, Inc., and will be retained by NetScreen Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and in 
accordance with Title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and 
following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, 
General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the 
Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee will be renewed for a 
two-year period beginning on June 30, 2017.
    The Committee will provide advice to the Director, Office of 
Science (DOE), on the Advanced Scientific Computing Research Program 
managed by the Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research.
    Additionally, the renewal of the Advanced Scientific Computing 
Advisory Committee has been determined to be essential to the conduct 
of the Department of Energy business and to be in the public interest 
in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the 
Department of Energy, by law and agreement. The Committee will operate 
in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, adhering to the rules and regulations in implementation of that 
Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Chalk at (301) 903-5152, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#07646f756e74736e696229646f666b6c4774646e626964622963686229606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbd8d3c9d2c8cfd2d5de95d8d3dad7d0fbc8d8d2ded5d8de95dfd4de95dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 30, 2017.
Shena Kennerly,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
    Editorial Note: This document was received for publication by 
the Office of the Federal Register on September 29, 2017.

[FR Doc. 2017-21328 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of Theodore Simpson, Petitioner, v State of New York et al., Respondents.

[987 NYS2d 589]

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.
<PAGE>

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Duff & Phelps Credit Rating Co. of Europe, an Illinois Corporation
100% wholly-owned by the Company

Duff & Phelps Credit Rating Co. of Asia, an Illinois Corporation
100% wholly-owned by the Company

Duff & Phelps Credit Rating Co. of Southeast Asia, a Singapore Corporation
100% wholly-owned by the Company

Duff & Phelps de Argentina Sociedad Calificadora de Riesgo S.A., an Argentine
Company 100% wholly-owned by the Company

DCR Espana Duff & Phelps, Entidad Calificadora de Riesgos
55% owned by the Company
EXHIBIT 15.1






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-85090, 333-108896, 333-110486 333-131315, 333-140174, 333-141640,  333-148747 333-163196, 333-169389 and 333-169491on Form F-3, and Nos. 33-80947, 333-06482, 333-11720, 333-83204, 333-107943, 333-117565, 333-138837, 333-153710 and 333-166428 on Form S-8, of our reports dated February 24, 2010 relating to the financial statements of Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (the “Company’) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.
  Brightman Almagor Zohar &Co.
 Certified Public Accountants
 A member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
 
 Tel Aviv, Israel
 December 28, 2010
Exhibit 10(a)


 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM


 


We consent to the incorporation by reference
in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 423 to Registration Statement No. 33-26305 on
Form N-1A of our report dated October 23, 2014, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of BlackRock Multi-Manager
Alternative Strategies Fund (the “Fund”), a series of BlackRock Funds, appearing in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR
of BlackRock Funds for the period ended August 31, 2014, and to the references to us under the headings "Financial Highlights"
and “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Prospectus and "Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm" and "Financial Statements" in the Statement of Additional Information, which are part of such Registration
Statement.


 


 


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


 


Philadelphia, PA


December 23, 2014
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50569 Conference Calendar

JACINTO ARZATE-CORNEJO, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus R. D. MILES, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-99-CV-471-SS

- - - - - - - - - - December 13, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jacinto Arzate-Cornejo, federal prisoner # 91427-011, appeals from the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Arzate-Cornejo argues that he has not received all the credit that he is due toward his federal sentence. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b), Arzate-Cornejo may be awarded credit toward his term of imprisonment for any time he spent in official detention prior to the commencement of his sentence that was not credited against another sentence. Because Arzate-Cornejo received credit toward his state sentence duringNo. 00-50569 -2- this period, he may not receive credit toward his federal sentence. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
[Nos. 67607-5-I; 67700-4-I.

Division One.

October 22, 2012.]

#### David Capobianco et al., *Respondents,*v. Vulcan, Inc., et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 10-2-09609-4, Laura C. Inveen, J., entered August 3, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Dwyer, J.,

concurred in by Becker and Appelwick, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Radiant Oil & Gas, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John M. Jurasin, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:   April  15, 2011By:/s/ John M. JurasinJohn M. JurasinPrincipal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10166]

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that three objects to be included in the exhibition “Caravaggio: Masterpieces from the Galleria Borghese,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The J. Paul Getty Museum at the Getty Center, Los Angeles, California, from on or about November 21, 2017, until on or about February 18, 2018, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of the imported objects, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made                           ( print page 48310)                        pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 11, 2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Alyson Grunder,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2017-22410 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
EXHIBIT 32

                          EYE CATCHING MARKETING CORP.
                              A Nevada Corporation

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eye Catching Marketing Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Robert Hemmerling,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Devinder Randhawa, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated May ____, 2004                        /s/ Robert Hemmerling
                                            ---------------------
                                            Robert Hemmerling,
                                            President and C.E.O.


                                            /s/ Devinder Randhawa
                                            ----------------------
                                            Devinder Randhawa,
                                            C.F.O. and Secretary