alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9035-6]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564-7146 or                     *http://www2.epa.gov/​nepa/​.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) 

Filed 10/02/2017 through 10/06/2017 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                    *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-nepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20170198, Final, USAF, MD,*                     Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization Program, Joint Base Andrews-Naval Air Facility, Review Period Ends: 11/15/2017, Contact: Ms Jean Renolds 210-925-4534.                

EIS No. 20170200, Draft, FTA, PA, King of Prussia Rail Project, Comment Period Ends: 12/4/2017, Contact: Daniel Koenig 202-366-8224.

EIS No. 20170201, Draft, USN, CA, Hawaii-Southern Californian Training and Testing, Comment Period Ends: 12/12/2017, Contact: Nora Macariola-See 808-472-1402.

EIS No. 20170202, Draft, USFS, CO, CP District-wide Salvage, Comment Period Ends: 11/30/2017, Contact: Mike Tooley 719-274-6321.

Dated: October 9, 2017.

Kelly Knight,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2017-22165 Filed 10-13-17; 12:00 pm]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
exv10w2



 




EXHIBIT 10.2




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of March
29, 2007, by and between IMAGE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Image”), and
DAVID BORSHELL, an individual (“Executive”), with respect to that certain Employment
Agreement, dated April 1, 2004 by and between Image and Executive (the “Agreement”).



The following shall amend the Agreement currently in effect as set forth herein. Except as
modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Capitalized terms
used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.



1. Amendment of Paragraph 7. The first clause of the second sentence of Paragraph 7
shall be amended to replace March 31, 2007 with May 31, 2007 such that the amended sentence shall
read as follows:



“The second one year option must be exercised by Image by May 31, 2007, in the same manner
described above, to extend the term from April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009.”



2. Amendment of Paragraph 13. The first sentence of Subsection (a)of Paragraph 13
shall be amended to read as follows:



“If (1) this Agreement is terminated by Image prior to expiration of the Term for any reason
other than (a) pursuant to Paragraph 10 (Death) or 11 (Permanent Disability/Suspension), (b) for
Cause or (c) pursuant to Paragraph 14 (Executive’s Right to Terminate for Good Reason) and if such
termination occurs after a Change in Control, Executive shall be entitled to receive all of the
compensation, rights and benefits described in Paragraphs 3(a) and (b), 4 and 5 for a period of one
year following the effective date of termination, or through the expiration of the Term, whichever
is longer, and the severance described in Paragraph 6, as if this Agreement were in full force and
effect.”



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to the Agreement to be duly
executed as of the day and year first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:



IMAGE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Dennis Hohn Cho
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Dennis Hohn Cho 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President, General Counsel

and Corporate Secretary 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	     /s/ David Borshell
 	 
	 	David Borshell
Exhibit 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Douglas K. Beplate, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Emergency Filtration Products,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003

/s/Douglas K. Beplate
Douglas K. Beplate, Principal Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Claudio RODRIGUEZ, a.k.a. Tony, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-50184.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 14, 2011.

Harvinder S. Anand, Assistant U.S., Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jerald Lee Brainin, Esquire, Los Ange-les, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Claudio Rodriguez appeals from the 80-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for intentionally distributing a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(l)(b)(l)(B)(viii), and intentionally distributing a mixture or substance containing cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(l)(b)(l)(A)(iii). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), *702Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          0
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3563
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                       50
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3613)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    0
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3563)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3563)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3563)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .00



</TABLE>
[No. 29895-7-III.

Division Three.

October 23, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Darren R. Hopkins, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kittitas County, No. 11-8-00006-5, Scott R. Sparks, J., entered April *25,2011.Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Korsmo, C.J.,

concurred in by Siddoway, J.; Sweeney, J., dissenting.
II 

Calendar No. 204 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2972 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 4, 2009 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 115 West Edward Street in Erath, Louisiana, 

as the ‘‘Conrad DeRouen, Jr. Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONRAD DEROUEN, JR. POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 115 West Edward Street in 

6 Erath, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Conrad DeRouen, Jr. Post Office’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2972 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Conrad DeRouen, Jr. 

5 Post Office’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 204 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2972 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Erath, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Conrad DeRouen, Jr. al Service located at 115 West Edward Street in 

NOVEMBER 4, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO 
 F.N.B.
CORPORATION 
 RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 20, 2013 

(Pursuant to 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan) 

This Amendment to the Restricted Stock Agreement (“Amended Agreement”) is made and entered into as of December 17, 2014 between F.N.B.
Corporation, a Florida corporation (the “Company”), and John C. Williams, Jr. (the “Employee”). 
 WITNESSETH:

 WHEREAS, on March 20, 2013, the Company and Employee entered into a Restricted Stock Agreement (the “Agreement”) in connection
with the grant of 3,692 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Shares”) to the Employee. 
 WHEREAS, the
Company and the Employee desire to correct a scrivener’s error concerning the terms of the accelerated vesting of the Shares which would occur on the Employee’s “Normal Retirement” as described under Section 2(d)(4) of the
Agreement. 
 WHEREAS, in granting the Shares under the Agreement to Employee the intent of the F.N.B. Corporation was that upon the Employee’s
Normal Retirement in a calendar year other than the calendar year in which the Shares were awarded to Employee, the Employee’s Shares shall be subject to immediate vesting upon the Employee’s Normal Retirement Date under the Agreement.

 WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee mutually agree to amend the Agreement for the purpose of clarifying the accelerated vesting of the
Employee’s Shares under the Agreement in the circumstance of the Employee’s Normal Retirement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and intending to be legally bound hereby, each of the parties covenants and agrees that effective December 17, 2014, Section 2(d)(4) of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as
follows: 
 Section 2. Terms and Conditions 
  

	 	(d)	Termination of Employment; Forfeiture or Acceleration of Shares. 

  

	 	(4)	Normal Retirement. The service vesting requirement set forth under Section 2(a) of this Agreement shall be waived upon Employee’s “Normal Retirement” (as that term is defined in the
Plan) in a calendar year other than the calendar year in which the Shares were awarded to Employee and Employee’s Shares shall be entitled to immediately vest on the Normal Retirement Date. 


Except as modified by this Amendment to the Agreement, all terms, conditions, covenants, rights and remedies contained in the Agreement and any documents
executed in connection therewith shall remain in full force and effect and continue to remain valid and enforceable. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to F.N.B. Corporation Restricted Stock
Agreement, dated March 20, 2013, to be executed in its name and on its behalf this 17th day of December, 2014, effective as of the dates provided herein. 

 

							
	F.N.B. CORPORATION	 		  	EMPLOYEE	  	
				
		 		  	 /s/ John C. Williams, Jr.
	  	
		 		  	Name: John C. Williams, Jr.	  	
	 /s/ Vincent J. Delie, Jr.
	 		  		  	
	Name: Vincent J. Delie, Jr.	 		  		  	
	Title: C.E.O. and President
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00147-CR

GUILLERMO SANTILLAN,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. D38068-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Guillermo Santillan Jr., entered an open plea of guilty to the offense of 

manufacture or delivery of a controlled substance in an amount greater than or equal to 

200 grams but less than 400 grams. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112(e) 

(West 2017). The trial court accepted appellant’s guilty plea, found him guilty, and 

assessed punishment at twelve years’ imprisonment. Sentence was imposed on March 

22, 2019. No motion for new trial was filed. Because no motion for new trial was filed, 
Santillan v. State Page 2

appellant was required to file his notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment within 

thirty days after the day sentence was imposed in open court. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.2(a)(1). Thirty days from March 22, 2019 was April 21, 2019, which was a Sunday. 

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 4.1, the timetable for filing appellant’s 

notice of appeal extended to the “end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or 

legal holiday.” Id. at R. 4.1. As such, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on the next 

day that was not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday—Monday, April 22, 2019. See id. 

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until the following day—April 23, 2019.

An appellant must timely perfect an appeal to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. “If 

an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to 

address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances[,] it can take no action other 

than to dismiss the appeal.” Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998)

(citing Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)).

Because appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal in this matter, we hereby 

dismiss this appeal.1 See Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210; see also Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523.

 

1 We note that appellate courts may extend the time to file the notice of appeal if, within fifteen 

days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the party: (a) files in the trial court the notice of 

appeal; and (b) files in the appellate court a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal. TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.3. Appellant has not filed a motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal in this case. 

Therefore, we cannot apply Rule 26.3 to extend the filing deadline for appellant’s notice of appeal. See id.; 

see also Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (“When a notice of appeal, but no motion 

for extension of time, is filed within the fifteen-day period, the court of appeal lacks jurisdiction to dispose 

of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction.”).
Santillan v. State Page 3

JOHN E. NEILL

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed July 10, 2019

Do not publish

[CR25]
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Innkeepers USA Trust (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Bruce Riggins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 8, 2006
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
FLORSHEIM GROUP INC.


Statement re computation of Net Earnings Per Common Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Twelve Months                  Twelve Months
                                                        Ended                         Ended
                                                 December 30, 1995 (1)           December 28, 1996
                                                 -------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                 <C>                           <C>
Primary:

Shares Outstanding                                    8,346,051                     8,346,051
Common Stock Equivalents                                   -                           33,236
                                                      ---------                     ---------

Weighted average common share during the period       8,346,051                     8,379,287
</TABLE>

   (1)  Common stock equivalents were not included since the exercise of them 
        would have had an antidilutive effect on the net loss per share.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





REQUIRED
BY RULE 13A - 14(B) OR RULE 15D - 14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgetech Services
Inc. On Form
10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
 Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bob Bates, CFO
of  the  Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
that:





(1)   
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.





By:
/s/ Bob Bates


Bob Bates


CFO





June 15, 2009
LIVESTAR ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Livestar Entertainment Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Edwin Kwong, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and (2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Edwin
Kwong Edwin KwongPrincipal Financial
Officer

November 22, 2004

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Livestar Entertainment Group, Inc. and will be retained by Livestar Entertainment Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.