alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         October 18, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 13, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 369 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-8, CP2018-15.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-22583 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7931

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus YOLANDA VIOLA BURGESS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-00-162; CA-03-1281-AM) Submitted: April 15, 2004 Decided: April 22, 2004 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yolanda Viola Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Riley Pedersen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Yolanda Burgess seeks to appeal the district court’s order recharacterizing her 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (2000) motion as a motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that her constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burgess has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Burgess’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IB 

Union Calendar No. 204 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3224 

[Report No. 111–276, Parts I and II] 

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to plan, 

design, and construct a vehicle maintenance building at the vehicle maintenance branch of the Smithsonian Institution located in Suitland, Maryland, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2009 

Mr. BECERRA (for himself, Ms. MATSUI, and Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 

Reported from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

DECEMBER 3, 2009 

Reported from the Committee on House Administration, committed to the 

Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered 

to be printed 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3224 RH

A BILL 

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to plan, design, and construct a vehicle maintenance building at the vehicle maintenance branch of the 

Smithsonian Institution located in Suitland, Maryland, 

and for other purposes. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3224 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING, SUITLAND, 

4 MARYLAND. 

5 (a) AUTHORITY TO PLAN, DESIGN, AND CON6 STRUCT.—The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Insti7 tution is authorized to plan, design, and construct a vehi8 cle maintenance building at the vehicle maintenance 

9 branch of the Smithsonian Institution located in Suitland, 

10 Maryland. 

11 (b) PURPOSE OF BUILDING.—The purpose of the 

12 building shall be to provide a facility to be used for hous13 ing, maintaining, and repairing vehicles and transpor14 tation equipment of the Smithsonian Institution. 

15 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

16 There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

17 this Act $4,000,000 for fiscal year 2010. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 204 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3224 

[Report No. 111–276, Parts I and II] 

A BILL 

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsoposes. cated in Suitland, Maryland, and for other pur- tenance branch of the Smithsonian Institution lo- vehicle maintenance building at the vehicle main- nian Institution to plan, design, and construct a 

DECEMBER 3, 2009 

Reported from the Committee on House Administration, 

the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed committed to the Committee of the Whole House on 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1167

LAL M'MALANI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK

COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (CA-97-7-4)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 15, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lal M'malani, Appellant Pro Se. Dean C. Berry, NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING & DRY DOCK COMPANY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant M’malani appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Newport News Shipyard and Drydock Company on his

claim of employment discrimination under the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-634 (West Supp. 1997). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. M'malani v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co., No.

CA-97-7-4 (E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code  I, Michael J. Marx, the Chief Financial Officer of Nano Mask, Inc. (Nano Mask), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the accompanying Form 10-Q of Nano Mask for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nano Mask.   /s/ Michael J. Marx Michael J. Marx Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  June 30, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

         CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Transition Auto Finance III
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kenneth C. Lowe, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 6, 2004                       /s/ ______________________
                                               Kenneth C. Lowe
                                     Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

                                       18
#### Win Properties, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Feder’s Auto Sales & Service, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[666 NYS2d 470]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover rents due under a lease, the defendants Feder’s Auto Sales & Service, Inc. and Michael Feder appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), dated September 18, 1996, as is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal sum of $106,956.35.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The court properly denied the appellants’ motion, made during trial, to amend their answer so as to assert the affirmative defense of constructive eviction, as their belated assertion of that defense was prejudicial to the plaintiffs *(see, Loomis v Civetta Corinno Constr. Corp.,*54 NY2d 18, 23).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Oneida County Department of Social Services, on Behalf of Cindy Marsh, Formerly Known as Cindy Morgan, Respondent, v David Yeomans, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[858 NYS2d 620]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Randal B. Caldwell, J.), entered January 24, 2007 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order, among other things, confirmed the determination of the Support Magistrate that respondent had willfully failed to pay child support.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Matter of Sacco v Profit,*133 AD2d 535 [1987]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Green, Pine and Gorski, JJ.
JUPITER
      GLOBAL HOLDINGS, CORP.


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of JUPITER GLOBAL HOLDINGS, CORP. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ray
      Hawkins, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:






(1)    
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







/s/
      “Ray Hawkins”


Ray
      Hawkins


Principal
      Executive Officer


Dated:
      September 20, 2005













A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to JUPITER GLOBAL HOLDINGS, CORP. and will be retained by JUPITER
      GLOBAL HOLDINGS, CORP. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2274

IRVIN H. CATLETT, JR., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:08-cv-00438-PJM) 

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 2, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Irvin H. Catlett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Briggs, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Irvin H. Catlett, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order denying ten petitions to quash administrative summonses 

issued by the Internal Revenue Service. Our review of the 

record discloses that the Government met its burden of proof 

under 28 U.S.C. § 7602 (2006) to support the enforcement of the 

summonses. See United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58 

(1964); Alphin v. United States, 809 F.2d 236, 238 (4th Cir. 

1987). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
## Patricia M. Wagner, CSR

P.O. Box 760 Weimar, Texas 78962

Tel. 361.772.0630 pattiwagcsr@gmail.com

NOTIFICATION OF LATE REPORTER’S RECORD January 7, 2015

Court of Appeals Number: 04-14-00800-CR

Trial Court Number: 12-1160-CR Trial Court Style: State of Texas v. Whitney Elizabeth Knowlton County and District Court from which appeal is take n: Guadalupe County

I am the official court reporter responsible for pr eparing part of the reporter’s record in the above-mentioned appeal. The approximate date(s ) of proceeding(s) was/were:

UNKNOWN

I anticipate the length of the record to be : UNKNOWN

I am unable to file the record by the due date beca use of the following reason(s):

X The appellant has failed to order the record.

__The appellant failed to order the record timely.

__The appellant has failed to pay the fee or make a rrangements to pay the fee for preparing such record.

__Preparation of reporter’s record ordered prior to the instant one precludes completion of this record by said due date. My required monthly status report showing records requested is on file with the 1 st , 13 th , 14 th , and 4 th Courts of Appeals Clerks.

X Other: This reporter has not been contacted by the appellate attorney. After talking with the Court Coordinator, she gave me the name of Sam Lock who she believes was retained for the appeal but was not sure. This rep orter is in the process of calling Mr.

Lock to confirm this information and to ask him to send me a Designation of Record as soon as possible so this reporter knows what record s to prepare. Please feel free to call me with any questions.

I anticipate the record will be completed by: Febr uary 6, 2015

I, Patricia M. Wagner, certify that I sent copies o f this Notice by regular mail or fax to the attorneys for the parties. Date:___1/7/2015_____ Signature:____/s/ PATRICIA WA GNER, CSRCC: Guadalupe County District Clerk

25 th Judicial District Attorney’s Office/Ms. Hines
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2760 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2760

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1615 North Wilcox Avenue in Los Angeles, California, as the ``Johnny 
                Grant Hollywood Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHNNY GRANT HOLLYWOOD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1615 North Wilcox Avenue in Los Angeles, California, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Johnny Grant Hollywood Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Johnny 
Grant Hollywood Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3072 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3072

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 9810 Halls Ferry Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Coach Jodie 
                     Bailey Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COACH JODIE BAILEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9810 Halls Ferry Road in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Coach Jodie Bailey Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Coach 
Jodie Bailey Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3072

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 9810 Halls Ferry Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Coach Jodie 
                     Bailey Post Office Building''.
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 201 (Thursday, October 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22655]



[[Page 48717]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1499-005.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: City of Independence 2018 Stated 
Rate Compliance Filing to be effective 1/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20171013-5110.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-73-000.
    Applicants: NorthWestern Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Request to Disclaim 
Jurisdiction--SA 828 Agreement with Vista LLC to be effective 10/14/
2017.
    Filed Date: 10/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20171013-5092.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-74-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Serv. Agreement Nos. 2nd 
Rev. 3349, 4792, 4793, Queue No. U2-073/Z2-013/AB2-038 to be effective 
9/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 10/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20171013-5124.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-75-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2017-10-13_Installed 
Capacity (ICAP) Deferral Process Filing to be effective 12/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 10/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20171013-5149.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/3/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: October 13, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-22655 Filed 10-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 21.1

MATTSON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Mattson International, Inc.

Mattson Technology Holdings, LLC

Mattson Wet Products, Inc.

Mattson Thermal Products, Inc.

STEAG CVD Systems, Ltd.

Mattson Technology Center KK

Mattson International Korea Co.

Mattson Technology of Singapore Pte. Ltd.

Mattson International, Inc. (Taiwan Branch)

Mattson Technology Holding, GmbH

Mattson International, GmbH

Mattson Thermal Products, GmbH

Mattson International France SARL

Mattson Technology UK Ltd.

Mattson Technology Srl

STEAG Electronic Systems SE Asia Pte. Ltd.

STEAG Electronic Systems UK, Ltd.

Mattson Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

Mattson Technology Cayman Holdings, Ltd.

Mattson Technology Canada, Inc.

Mattson Technology Israel, Ltd.



---