alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SCS-11.28.2014-EX10.1






EXHIBIT 10.1


2015-1 AMENDMENT
TO THE
STEELCASE INC. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(Most recently amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2009)
_____________________
This 2015-1 Amendment to the Steelcase Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (“Plan”) is adopted by Steelcase Inc.
Pursuant to Section 7.10 of the Plan, Steelcase Inc. amends the Plan effective as of the date specified below, as follows:


A.
Effective for deferral elections made after October 7, 2014, Section 4.1 is amended as follows:


4.1    Deferral Elections 
During the Election Period for the first Deferral Year in which a Participant is eligible to participate in the Plan, the Participant may elect a specified percentage of his or her Base Salary and/or a specified percentage (in whole percentages only) of his or her Bonus to be earned in the following Deferral Year which shall not be paid in cash, but shall instead be deferred and distributed to the Participant (or in the event of the Participant’s death, to his or her Beneficiary) in accordance with the provisions of Article 6.  The minimum annual deferral amount is 2% of the Participant’s Base Salary and 5% of the Participant’s Bonus.  The maximum annual deferral amount is 50% of the Participant’s Base Salary and 75% of the Participant’s Bonus.  The Administrative Committee may further limit or increase, at any time prior to the expiration of an Election Period, the minimum or maximum amount of Base Salary or Bonus that can be deferred by any Participant annually in the following Deferral Years.  Any election to defer shall not be effective unless the Participant also completes any forms as may be required by the Administrative Committee, including, but not limited to, the selection of investment media in which his or her Deferral Account shall be deemed invested pursuant to Section 5.3 and any life insurance forms.  
Any deferral election made by a Participant for a Deferral Year shall continue in effect for all subsequent Deferral Years unless the Participant completes a new election form and delivers it to the Administrative Committee during a subsequent Election Period.


B.


In all other respects, the Plan shall be unchanged.











Signature
Steelcase Inc. executes this 2015-1 Amendment to the Plan on the date stated below.


	
		
	 
	STEELCASE INC.

	 
	 

	Dated:  October 7, 2014
	 /s/ Lizbeth S. O’Shaughnessy               

	 
	Signature

	 
	 

	 
	Lizbeth S. O’Shaughnessy

	 
	Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative

	 
	Officer, General Counsel and Secretary
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth S. Virges, Appellant.

[987 NYS2d 783]

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D’Amico, J.), rendered July 10, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed and the matter is remitted to Erie County Court for proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree (§ 221.10 [2]). County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence seized from his person and vehicle. The police officer had an “objective, credible reason” for approaching defendant’s parked vehicle and requesting information based on a tip provided by an anonymous informant, who reported that a man was sitting in a gray car smoking marihuana at a certain address *(People v Ocasio,*85 NY2d 982, 985 [1995]; *see People v Boler,*106 AD3d 1119, 1121 [2013]). Defendant’s vehicle matched that description and was parked at that address. When the police officer smelled marihuana, he had probable cause to search defendant and the vehicle for contraband *(see People v Robinson,*103 AD3d 421, 421-422 [2013], *lv denied*20 NY3d 1103 [2013]; *People v Contant,*90 AD3d 779, 780 [2011], *lv*
      *1446
      *denied*18 NY3d 956 [2012]; *People v Black, 59*AD3d 1050, 1051 [2009], *lv denied*12 NY3d 851 [2009]; *see generally Arizona v Gant,*556 US 332, 351 [2009]; *People v Blasich,*73 NY2d 673, 678 [1989]).

Present—Smith, J.E, Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.
Exhibit
      32.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Quick-Med Technologies, Inc. ("the Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Nam H. Nguyen,
      Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Dated: May
      12, 2006








/s/
      Nam H. Nguyen


Nam
      H.
      Nguyen


Chief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and the statements of income of Rome Bancorp, Inc.
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,510,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       5,643,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            19,200,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 53,631,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,363,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,319,000
<LOANS>                                    138,835,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,901,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             233,031,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 200,275,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,552,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,204,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             233,031,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,435,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,825,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            11,260,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,181,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,181,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,079,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             265,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,988,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,048,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,368,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.15
<LOANS-NON>                                    661,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    50,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,956,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  274,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   219,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,901,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,901,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report of Mymetics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Christian J.F. Rochet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ernst Luebke,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Christian J.F. Rochet
   ------------------------------
Christian J.F. Rochet
Chief Executive Officer



By: /s/ Ernst Luebke
   ------------------------------
Ernst Luebke
Chief Financial Officer

April 15, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6931

OSBALDO LEMUS BERRIOS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL S. WOLL; WOLL & WOLL, P.A.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:20-cv-03195-TDC)

Submitted: December 21, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Osbaldo Lemus Berrios, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6931 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Osbaldo Lemus Berrios appeals the district court’s order dismissing Berrios’ civil 

complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Berrios v. Woll, 

No. 8:20-cv-03195-TDC (D. Md. May 12, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6931 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Sokol,  Chief  Executive  Officer of MidAmerican  Funding,  LLC (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company  for the annual  period
          ended  December  31,  2002  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated:   March 25, 2003




                                       /s/  David L. Sokol
                                       -----------------------
                                       David L. Sokol
                                       Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code  I, Edward Suydam, the Chief Executive Officer of Nano Mask, Inc. (Nano Mask), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the accompanying Form 10-Q of Nano Mask for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nano Mask.  /s/ Edward Suydam Edward Suydam Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Nano Mask, Inc.  August 1, 2011
EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Yucheng Ding, Co- Chief Executive Officer of Sun New Media, Inc., certify that1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sun New Media, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e)and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report was being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting./s/Yucheng Ding
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-140904) pertaining to the Options Issued Pursuant to Individual Option Agreements, the 2000Stock Option Plan, the Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Option Plan, the 2006 Equity Incentive Planand the Warrants Issued to Employees, Directors and Service Providers of Artes Medical, Inc. of ourreport dated March 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ArtesMedical, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPSan Diego, California
#### Lincoln James, Respondent, v Edward James, Appellant.

[859 NYS2d 479]

In an action, inter alia, to partition real property and for an accounting, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered May 4, 2007, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“[O]ne who holds an interest in real property as a tenant in common may seek physical partition of the property, or, a partition and sale thereof unless it appears that physical partition alone would greatly prejudice the owners of the premises” *(Bufogle v Greek,*152 AD2d 527, 528 [1989]; *see*RPAPL 901 [1]; *Graffeo v Paciello,*46 AD3d 613, 614 [2007]).

Here, the plaintiff established his entitlement to summary judgment by establishing his ownership and right to possession of the subject property pursuant to a duly-executed warranty deed conveying to him a one-half interest in the subject property as a tenant in common *(see*RPAPL 901 [1]; *Duffy v Duffy,*21 AD3d 928, 929 [2005]; *Dalmacy v Joseph,*297 AD2d 329, 330 [2002]). While the right of a tenant in common pursuant to RPAPL 901 to maintain an action for partition is subject to the equities of the parties *(see Graffeo v Paciello,*46 AD3d 613, 614 [2007]), here the equities favor the plaintiffs position *(see generally Donlon v Diamico,*33 AD3d 841, 842 [2006]).

In opposing the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether his transfer of a one-half interest in the subject property to the plaintiff was made in reliance on a promise by the plaintiff to reconvey that interest *(see Sharp v Kosmalski,*40 NY2d 119, 121 [1976]; *Doria v Masucci,*230 AD2d 764, 765 [1996]; *Bufogle v Greek,*152 AD2d 527, 528 [1989]; *Gargano v V.C.&J. Constr. Corp.,*148 AD2d 417, 418 [1989]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly rejected the defendant’s contentions regarding the imposition of a constructive trust, and granted the plaintiffs *475motion for summary judgment *(see Sharp v Kosmalski,*40 NY2d 119, 121 [1976]; *Doria v Masucci,*230 AD2d 764, 765 [1996]; *Bufogle v Greek,*152 AD2d 527, 528 [1989]; *Gargano v V.C.&J. Constr. Corp.,*148 AD2d 417, 418 [1989]). Skelos, J.P, Santucci, Balkin and Chambers, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20357

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAFAEL TERRONES-GONZALEZ, also known as Rafael Terrones, also 

known as Mario Munoz Perez, also known as Rafael Terrones Gonzalez, also 

known as Mario M. Perez, also known as Elvin Munoz Estrada, also known as 

Rafael Gonzalez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CR-74-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rafael TerronesGonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Terrones-Gonzalez has filed a response. We have 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-20357 Document: 00513012753 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
No. 14-20357

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein, as well as Terrones-Gonzalez’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-20357 Document: 00513012753 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Poseidis,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB/A  for the  period  ended  November  30,  2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John J.
McGovern,  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  September 13, 2006       /s/John J. McGovern
                                -------------------------------------
                                John J. McGovern
                                Executive Vice President and
                                Chief Financial Officer




---------------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of G/O International, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Annual Report"), I, Jack L. Burns, President, Treasurer and director of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.


Dated: 4/14/2004                             /s/Jack L. Burns
      -----------                            ----------------------
                                             Jack L. Burns
                                             President
                                             Treasurer
                                             Director