alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit  13.1




Certification Pursuant To


18 US C Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant To


Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Tower Semiconductor Ltd.  (the “Registrant”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Russell C.  Ellwanger, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and section 13 (a).




2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/  Russell C.  EllwangerRussell C.  EllwangerChief Executive Officer







April 30, 2010




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

1.       First Federal of the South (federally chartered stock savings
         association), organized under the laws of the United States of America

2.       Magnolia Title Services, Inc. (title insurance and related services)
         (50% ownership interest), organized under the laws of the State of
         Alabama*

3.       SouthFirst Financial Services, Inc. (insurance products and financial
         services), organized under the laws of the State of Alabama

4.       SouthFirst Mortgage, Inc. (residential construction lending), organized
         under the laws of the State of Alabama


*        Entire interest sold back to Magnolia Title Services, Inc. in November
         2003.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48320-48321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Veterans' Rural Health Advisory Committee; (Amended) Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act that the Veterans' Rural Health Advisory 
Committee will meet on November 1-2, 2017. The meeting will be held at 
333 John Carlyle St., 4th Floor Conference Room, in Alexandria, VA 
22314 on November 1-2; both meeting sessions will begin at 8:30 a.m. 
(EST) each day and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. (EST). The meetings are open to 
the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on rural health care issues affecting Veterans. The Committee 
examines Programs and policies that impact the delivery of VA rural 
health care to Veterans and discusses ways to improve and enhance VA 
access to rural health care services for Veterans.
    The agenda will include updates from Department leadership, the 
Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for Health for Policy and Services, 
Director Office of Rural Health and Committee Chairman, as well as 
presentations on general health care access.
    Public comments will be received at 4:30 p.m. on November 1, 2017. 
Interested parties should contact Ms. Judy Bowie, via email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2472766c65676452450a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b7e1e5fff6f4f7c1d699d0d8c1">[email protected]</span></a>, via fax at (202) 632-8615, or by mail at 810 Vermont 
Avenue NW.

[[Page 48321]]

(10P1R), Washington, DC 20420. Individuals wishing to speak are invited 
to submit a 1-2 page summary of their comment for inclusion in the 
official meeting record. Any member of the public seeking additional 
information should contact Ms. Bowie at the phone number or email 
address noted above.

    Dated: October 4, 2017.
LaTonya L. Small,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-22449 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2972 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2972

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
115 West Edward Street in Erath, Louisiana, as the ``Conrad DeRouen, Jr. 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONRAD DEROUEN, JR. POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 115 West Edward Street in Erath, Louisiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Conrad DeRouen, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Conrad 
DeRouen, Jr. Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Edgar Casiano, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

*[666*NYS2d 636]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered May 15,1996, which denied defendants’ motion to vacate their default, unanimously re*245versed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the motion granted on condition that defendants pay $3,000 to plaintiffs attorneys to cover the costs of the motion to vacate.

While defendants’ excuse for their default, i.e., law office failure by reason of understaffing, is not particularly compelling, their submissions upon the within timely motion for vacatur .make it clear that they possess a meritorious defense and that the default was not intentional. Accordingly, we believe that this is not an appropriate case for departure from this State’s strong preference for resolving controversies upon the merits and grant defendants’ motion subject to their satisfaction of the above-noted condition. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
`[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3193 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 104
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3193

                          [Report No. 111-245]

  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 
South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ``Alto Lee 
                Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2009

Mr. Rooney (for himself, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Mack, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. 
   Miller of Florida, Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Klein of 
 Florida, and Mr. Hastings of Florida) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

                           September 8, 2009

        Additional sponsors: Mr. Putnam and Mr. Young of Florida

                           September 8, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed





_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 
South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ``Alto Lee 
                Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse''.


 


    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 101 South United 
States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Alto Lee Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Alto Lee Adams, 
Sr., United States Courthouse''.
                                                 House Calendar No. 104

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3193

                          [Report No. 111-245]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 
South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ``Alto Lee 
                Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 8, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
Section 302 Certification



I, Thomas J. Flahie, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intermix Media, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 11, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas J. Flahie         
|                        |  |  |  | Thomas J. Flahie             
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                        |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
|        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)    | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                                                                  |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

|                           |                                       |        |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:  February 28, 2011 | /s/ William J. Fehrman                |   |
|                      | William J. Fehrman                    |   |
|                      | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                      | (principal executive officer)         |   |
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-23-00256-CV

IN RE MADISON MILLER

Original Proceeding

From the 21st District Court

Burleson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 30654

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Relator Madison Miller on August 25, 

2023, is denied.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith

(Chief Justice Gray dissenting)

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed January 18, 2024

[OT06]
[No. 67824-8-I.

Division One.

November 5, 2012.]

#### Global Education Services, Inc., *Respondent,*v. Mobal Communications, Inc., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 05-2-35544-1, Jim Rogers, J., entered October 6, 2011. *Reversed*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per

Ellington, J. Pro Tern.,

concurred in by Leach, C.J., and Grosse, J.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1623

NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN LAMBERT, Florence County Detention Admin.; SUSAN MCDOUGAL, Nurse, Florence County Detention Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-01-275-4-25BC) Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 23, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norman Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Eric Fulda, Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Norman Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Lambert , No. CA-01-275-4-25BC (D.S.C. May 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7263

THOMAS T. DILLARD, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FRANK PERRY; W. DAVID GUICE; GEORGE SOLOMON; PAULA Y. 

SMITH; MARSHALL PIKE; JASMINE T. BELYEW; JONNITA BAKER; 

HOWARD BELK; A. BARNES; LITONYA CARTER; GAIL BIEBER; 

WARDEN JOYNER; S. WHITE; MIKE BALL; MIKE SLAGLE; CYNTHIA 

THORNTON; THOMAS ASBELL; SHEILA GREENE; ASST. 

SUPERINTENDENT TOMLINSON; K. DALRYMPLE; JASON PENLAND; 

LAUREN HARRELL; D. GIBBS; C. HERNANDEZ; PAULA PAGE; DAVID 

MAY; CLAUDIA JONES; TIM JONES; J. DRIGGERS; PROGRAM 

SUPERVISOR BUCHANAN; G. GARNER; UNIT MANAGER CROWE; ASST. 

UNIT MANAGER GREEN; F. SPEER; NURSE PITTMAN; NURSE MELTON; 

HOPE SMITH; DOCTOR UMESI; FRANCESCA SHON; NURSE WOLFE; 

NURSE BUCHANAN; RASHIA L. NORMAN; SCARLETT R. ASWELL; 

CRISSY H. SMITH; P. G. CHRISAWN; P. KIRBY; CASE MANAGER NIVENS; 

B. LIDE; L. NORRIS; CASE MANAGER HUGHES; J. G. DUCKWORTH; 

TRANSFER COORDINATOR RUDISILL; J. CANNON; CARRIE TUCKER; 

GARY JUNKER; KRISTIE STANBACK; JEFFREY FIELDS; G. 

CRUTCHFIELD; PROGRAM SUPERVISOR STEWART; T. LOCKAMY; DR. 

LIGHTSEY; T. DEAL; K. FAIRLEY; NURSE GIL; GEORGIA BRYANT; 

SERGEANT WEBB; NURSE GARNER; NICOLE SPRUELL; ERIK A. HOOKS; 

JOHN/JANE DOE, Pharmacy Supervisor; JOHN/JANE DOE, Medical Supervisor; 

JOHN/JANE DOE, Case Manager; JOHN/JANE DOE, Social Worker; 

JOHN/JANE DOE, Nurse,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03119-D)

Submitted: January 17, 2019 Decided: January 23, 2019

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas T. Dillard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Thomas T. Dillard, Jr. appeals the district court’s orders accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) 

complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Dillard v. Perry, No. 5:17-ct-03119-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2017 & Aug. 10, 2018). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheet of  MidAmerican  Energy  Company as of June 30,
1996, and the related  consolidated  statements of income and cash flows for the
six months  ended  June 30,  1996,  and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                         0000928576
<NAME>                        MidAmerican Energy Company
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2,633,316
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    398,124
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         238,956
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       404,677
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 209,178
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,884,251
<COMMON>                                       801,439
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            450,191
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 1,242,588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          50,000
<PREFERRED>                                    78,577
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           1,109,683
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 166,317
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  392
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,236,694
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  3,884,251
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      810,458
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           53,364
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     640,675
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     694,039
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        116,419
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             11,226<F1>
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 127,645
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       42,942
<NET-INCOME>                                   84,703
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    4,661
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  80,042
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       60,440
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      39,768
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         181,258
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Tag 41 includes a $10,438,000 of Income from Discontinued Operations, net of
income taxes.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>