alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                       219
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,940
<PP&E>                                           4,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,854
<BONDS>                                          5,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,030
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,126
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,083
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,344
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,609
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,634
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,975
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,975
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.54
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,497,163
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,674,903
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 20,896,520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,800,929
<PP&E>                                       6,681,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              77,094,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,094,142
<BONDS>                                     21,700,639
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         22
<COMMON>                                         8,009
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,291,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                77,094,758
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,351,774
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               37,749,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,223,126
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,648,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (210,218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (719,903)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (988,474)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>
[No. 29768-3-III.

Division Three.

October 11, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jonas Jackson Keys IV, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Klickitat County, No. 10-1-00118-4, Brian P. Altman, J., entered March 9, 2011. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded with instructions*by unpublished opinion per

Siddoway, J.,

concurred in by Korsmo, C.J., and Brown, J.
1996 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

7-31-1996

Sani-Dairy v. Sec Agri

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 95-3304,95-3304

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1996 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Sani-Dairy v. Sec Agri" (1996). 1996 Decisions. Paper 144.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996/144
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 

 

 No. 95-3304 

 

 

 SANI-DAIRY, a division of Penn Traffic Co., Inc.; 

 JOHN P. STRITTMATTER, d/b/a Strittmatters Dairy; 

 DELBERT THOMAS; ED THOMAS; LOWELL FRIEDLIN; 

 ARTHUR BLOOM; JAMES L. HARTEIS 

 

 v. 

 

 CLAYTON YEUTTER, Secretary of Agriculture, United 

 States Department of Agriculture; COMMISSIONER OF 

 AGRICULTURE AND MARKETS, STATE OF NEW YORK 

 

 (D.C. Civil No. 90-cv-00222) 

 MILK MARKETING, INC. 

 v. 

 CLAYTON YEUTTER, Secretary of Agriculture, 

 United States Department of Agriculture

 

 (D.C. Civil No. 90-cv-00236) 

 CLAYTON YEUTTER, Secretary of Agriculture, 

 United States Department of Agriculture; 

 DAN GLICKMAN, Secretary of Agriculture, 

 United States Department of Agriculture 

 and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,* 

 Appellants 

 

 (*Pursuant to Rule 12(a), F.R.A.P.) 

 

 

 ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

 

 Submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) on March 15, 1996 

 

Before: NYGAARD, SAROKIN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges. 

(Opinion Filed: July 31, 1996) 

__________ 
ORDER AMENDING OPINION FILED JULY 31, 1996 

__________ 

 Upon reviewing the submissions of counsel for appellee, Milk 

Marketing Inc., it is hereby ordered that the opinion filed in 

this case on July 31, 1996 be amended as follows: the language 

contained in footnote 1 is to be deleted and replaced with the 

following: 

 As set forth by the district court in its

 December, 1994 opinion at footnote one "By 

 Memorandum Order dated October 29, 1991, 

 (Docket No. 22), the Secretary's motion to 

 dismiss the complaint filed by plaintiff 

 Sani-Dairy was granted because Sani-Dairy, a 

 milk producer, or "handler" as that term is 

 defined by 7 C.F.R. 1002.7 failed to exhaust 

 its administrative remedies before seeking 

 judicial review." 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 29, 1996 

 By the Court, 

 /s/ Richard L. Nygaard 

 Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, John S. Scott, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PetroAlgae Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PetroAlgae Inc.



|                |  |                                                      
|--------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|               
|/sJohn S. Scott
|Name:           |  | John S. Scott                                        
|Title:          |  | Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: March 31, 2011

This certification
accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Memorandum Opini ons filed March

7 , 2023.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00652

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A .H., L.H., AND A.H., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Tria l Court Caus e No. 2020

- 015 31J

C O NCURR ING MEMORANDUM OPINION

I join the majority opinion in affirming the judgment of the trial court and

the ba sis for the termination of Mother ’ s parental rights

, with the exc eption of the

majority ’ s conclusion that Moth er ’ s drug use “ qualifi e s as an endangering course

of conduc t ” absent proof of such. S ee In re L.C. L., 599 S.W.3d 79

, 85

- 86 ( Tex.

Ap p

. — Houston [14th Dist.] 2020 , pet. denied ) (en banc ) ; see also Tex. Fam. Code

Ann. § 161.001(b) (1)(E)

. H ere, the evidence pre sented indicates that M other ’ s

mental health was the cause of the endangering conduct, not the u se of narcotics

.

A ccording to the testimony of Renee Hamil ton, the CPS caseworker

, the reason the2

children were in the cus tod y of CPS was t he lack of proof of M other ’ s co m p liance

with her medic at ion . Hamilton stated d uring trial that Mother had not proved “ that

she can have consistent medication management, which was very important and

also tied to the reason th e childr en are in custod y

. ” Altho ugh Mo ther tested

positive for drugs in violation of the Family Service P lan, t her e was no eviden ce

a dduced that Mo ther used drugs in f r o nt of the chil dren , or that her drug use , rath er

than her mental state , was the cause of endangerment to the children.

/s/ Margaret “ Meg ” Poissant

J ustice

Panel co n sists of Justice s Wise, Jewell, and Po i s sant. (Wise, J.

, m a jority).
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
AMCON Distributing Company on Form S-8 of our report dated November 24, 1999,
except for Note 16, for which the date is December 20, 1999, on our audits of
the financial statements and financial statement schedules of AMCON
Distributing Company as of September 30, 1999 and 1998, and for each of the
three years in the period ended September 30, 1999, which report is
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Omaha, Nebraska
December 22, 1999
Summary of Standard Director Comensation Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.24 
  
 MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 
  
 Summary of Standard Director Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors 
  
 Description of Director Compensation (effective as of April 25, 2006) 

 
 Directors who are employees of Magma do not receive separate compensation
for service on the Board of Directors. Directors who are not employees of Magma receive a cash retainer of $25,000 per year and $2,500 per Board or committee meeting attended ($500 for teleconference meetings) for services as a member of the Board
of the Directors. In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee and the Chairman of the Compensation Committee each receive a fee of $10,000 per year; the other members of the Audit Committee receive a fee of $5,000 per year, and the other
members of the Compensation Committee receive a fee of $2,500 per year. Magma reimburses its non-employee Directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the board or its Committees. 
  
 Pursuant to the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by Magma’s
stockholders, each non-employee director receives an initial stock option grant to purchase 50,000 shares of Magma common stock upon appointment or election. The initial option vests as to 25% of the shares on the first anniversary of the date of
grant with the remaining shares vesting monthly over the following three years. Following the conclusion of each regular annual meeting of stockholders, each continuing non-employee director receives an additional option to purchase 20,000 shares at
an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. When a non-employee director is appointed to the Board of Directors at a time other than at an annual meeting, such director receives a pro rata portion of
the 20,000 share grant. The annual grants and the interim grants vest in full on the day immediately prior to the annual meeting of stockholders in the year immediately following the year of the grant if the director continues as a member of the
Board on that date. All options will vest fully upon a change in control of Magma, as set forth under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Payment Data Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 14, 2008



| |     |                                 
| | --- | --------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ Michael R. Long             
| |     | Michael R. Long                 
| |     | Chief Executive Officer,        
| |     | Chief Financial Officer         
| |     | and Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        STATE OF
            SUBSIDIARY                INCORPORATION            DOING BUSINESS AS
-----------------------------------  ---------------  -----------------------------------
<S>                                  <C>              <C>
Universal Outdoor, Inc.                 Illinois      Universal Outdoor, Inc.
 
<CAPTION>
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF UNIVERSAL OUTDOOR, INC.
                                        STATE OF
            SUBSIDIARY                INCORPORATION            DOING BUSINESS AS
-----------------------------------  ---------------  -----------------------------------
<S>                                  <C>              <C>
HCA, Inc.                               Illinois      HCA, Inc.
Mall Media Acquisition Corp.            Delaware      Mall Media Acquisition Corp.
Matthew Acquisition Corp.               Delaware      Matthew Acquisition Corp.
Quantum Structures & Design, Inc.       Illinois      Quantum Structures & Design, Inc.
Revere Acquisition Corp.                Delaware      Revere Acquisition Corp.
Revere Holding Corp.                    Delaware      Revere Holding Corp.
Revere National Corporation of          Delaware      Revere National Corporation of
  Pennsylvania                                          Pennsylvania
Revere National Corporation of          Delaware      Revere National Corporation of
  Philadelphia                                          Philadelphia
Revere National Corporation of          Delaware      Revere National Corporation of
  Wilmington                                            Wilmington
Superior Outdoor Structures, Inc.       Illinois      Superior Outdoor Structures, Inc.
Tanner Acquisition Corp.                Delaware      Tanner Acquisition Corp.
Universal Outdoor Management            Delaware      Universal Outdoor Management
  Company, Inc.                                         Company, Inc.
Vision Digital Communications, LLC     California     Vision Digital Communications, LLC
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 23, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-61060

Summary Calendar

 

WILLIE HAMPTON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RAYMOND BARKER; FAYE BARKER,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:04-CV-160

--------------------

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Willie Hampton has appealed the district court’s judgment

dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim. 

Hampton contends that the district court should have recused

itself. No abuse of discretion has been shown. See Andrade v.

Chojnacki, 338 F.3d 448, 454–55 (5th Cir. 2003), cert. denied,

541 U.S. 935, and cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 1655 (2004).

Hampton contends that the district court erred in dismissing

his complaint for failure to state a claim without giving him an
No. 04-61060

-2-

opportunity to file an amended complaint. The district court

provided such an opportunity by ordering Hampton to show cause

why the complaint should not be dismissed. 

Long after entry of the judgment, Hampton filed a document

in the district court complaining that he mailed documents

applying for a default judgment against the defendants to the

clerk but that the clerk had failed to file the documents. 

Hampton contends that the district court failed to file and

docket these documents and that the district court erred in

failing to enter a default judgment. Although this issue is not

properly before the court, we note that any error on the part of

the district court in failing to file the documents was harmless. 

See FED. R. CIV. P. 61. 

The appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See FED. R. APP. P.

34(a)(2)(A). Hampton is WARNED that the filing of frivolous

motions and appeals will result in the imposition of a sanction. 

Hampton should review any pending motions and appeals to ensure

that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 List of Subsidiaries of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
 Subsidiary Name
    
    State of IncorporationAlarcon Holdings, Inc.
    
    New YorkCadena Estereotempo, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoGabriel Productions, LLC
    
    DelawareGabriel Series I, LLC
    
    DelawareJuJu Media, Inc.
    
    New YorkKLAX Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKLEY Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKPTI Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKRZZ Licensing, LLC
    
    DelawareKSAH Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKXOL Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKZAB Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKZBA Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareMega Media Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareMegafilms, Inc.
    
    DelawareMegaflix, Inc.
    
    DelawareMegaholdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareMegapics, Inc.
    
    DelawarePortorican American Broadcasting, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoSBS Bay Area, LLC
    
    DelawareSBS Funding, Inc.
    
    DelawareSBS Miami Broadcast Center, Inc.
    
    DelawareSBS of Greater New York, Inc.
    
    New YorkSBS Promotions, Inc.
    
    New YorkSpanish Broadcasting System Finance Corporation
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System Group of Puerto Rico, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoSpanish Broadcasting System Holding Company, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoSpanish Broadcasting System Inc. (NJ)
    
    New JerseySpanish Broadcasting System Network, Inc.
    
    New YorkSpanish Broadcasting System of California, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaSpanish Broadcasting System of Florida, Inc.
    
    FloridaSpanish Broadcasting System of Greater Miami, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System of Illinois, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System of Puerto Rico, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System of Puerto Rico, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoSpanish Broadcasting System of San Antonio, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System SouthWest, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System-San Francisco, Inc.
    
    DelawareWCMA Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWCMQ Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWDEK Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWEGM, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWIO, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWKIE Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWKIF Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWLEY Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWMEG Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWNOD, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWODA, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWOQI, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWPAT Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWRMA Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWSBS Licensing Inc. (f/k/a WDLP Licensing, Inc.)
    
    DelawareWSKQ Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWXDJ Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWZET Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWZNT, Inc.
    
    Puerto Rico
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3223 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the Department of Veterans Affairs contracting goals and preferences for small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2009 

Mr. BUYER (for himself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the 

Department of Veterans Affairs contracting goals and 

preferences for small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3223 IH

1 SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF VET2 ERANS AFFAIRS CONTRACTING GOALS AND 

3 PREFERENCES FOR SMALL BUSINESS CON4 CERNS OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VET5 ERANS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8127 of title 38, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘may’’ and in9 serting ‘‘shall’’; 

10 (2) in subsection (f), by adding at the end the 

11 following new paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(7) Ownership and control by a veteran or veterans 

13 of more than one small business concern shall not be 

14 grounds for disqualification of any of such concerns from 

15 inclusion in the database under this subsection.’’; and 

16 (3) in subsection (l), by adding at the end the 

17 following new paragraph: 

18 ‘‘(3) The term ‘control of management and 

19 daily business operations’ with respect to a business 

20 concern means the authority to make final decisions 

21 affecting financial, operational, management policy, 

22 and employment issues, irrespective of the number 

23 of hours worked by the individual with such author24 ity or the location of such individual with respect to 

25 the business concern.’’. 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3223 IH

1 (b) DEADLINE FOR INTERIM POLICY GUIDANCE.— 

2 By not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment 

3 of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall issue 

4 interim policy guidance to carry out the amendments 

5 made by this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS