alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                 Certification

I, Christian J.F. Rochet, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mymetics Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Dated:  March 26, 2009                   /s/ Christian J.F. Rochet
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Christian J.F. Rochet
                                        Chief Executive Officer
#### Maria Mayra Molina MELCHOR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72963.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 15, 2011.

Maria Mayra Molina Melchor, Canyon Country, CA, pro se.

John Wolfgang Gehart, Lourdes Barrera Haley, Esquire, Carlos Vellanoweth, Esquire, Vellanoweth & Gehart, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Jesse Lloyd Busen, Patrick James Glen, Esquire, Emily Anne Radford, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Offiee of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Mayra Molina-Melchor, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review *747of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo questions of law. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Molina Melchor’s motion to reopen because her failure to file the motion before the expiration of her voluntary departure period rendered her statutorily ineligible for the relief she sought. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d); *De Martinez v. Ashcroft,*374 F.3d 759, 763-64 (9th Cir.2004); *see also Granados-Oseguera v. Mukasey,*546 F.3d 1011, 1015-16 (9th Cir.2008). It follows that the BIA did not violate due process by not examining her new evidence of hardship. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring error and prejudice for a petitioner to prevail on a due process claim).

Molina Melchor’s remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Michael P. May, the Chief Executive Officer of
iSECUREtrac Corp. (the "Company"), and James E. Stark, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that:



Dated:
November 13, 2002

|/s/ Michael P. MayMichael P. May
Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | /s/ James E. StarkJames E. Stark
Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------

19

---

QuickLinks
| 1.   | The      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,      2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic      Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;    and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of      the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the      Company for the period covered by the Periodic  Report. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |   |   |                         |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
| /s/      Peter A. Michel       |   |   | /s/       Lincoln Zehr  |   |
| Peter      A. Michel                     |   |   | Lincoln      Zehr            |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer   |   |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 QUARTERLY REPORT FILED ON FORM
10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              431,747
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    458,194
<PP&E>                                              423,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                        4,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      879,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                66,588
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                       2,400,000
<COMMON>                                              9,729
<OTHER-SE>                                       (1,596,378)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        879,939
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (1,194,650)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (16,216)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1,178,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,178,434)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.12)



</TABLE>
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-55,687-06 IN RE MILTON VERAN WILLIAMS, Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. F 9573890-NL IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 5 F ROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamu s p u rsuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he sent a motion for judgme nt nunc pro tunc to the Crim i n al District Court No. 5 District Court of Dallas County on Marc h 16, 2015, and that he enclose d a s el f- addre ssed, stamped envelope with a reque st to return a file-stampe d copy of the motion to him. Relator alleg es that the Dallas County District Clerk has not responde d or filed his motion, and has not returne d a file- marke d copy to him as requeste d. In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Dallas County , is ordere d to file a re sponse stating whether Relator’s motion for judgment nunc pro tuncwas re ceive d and filed by the Clerk, and if so, when. The response shall also state whe ther a copy of the file-stampe d motion was returne d to Relator, and if not, why not. This a pplication for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitt ed the appropr iate response . Such response shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.
Filed: June 3, 2015 Do not publish
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3209 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to make the killing of a law enforcement officer, firefighter, or other first responder an aggravating factor 

for the imposition of the death penalty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2009 

Mr. GERLACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to make the killing 

of a law enforcement officer, firefighter, or other first 

responder an aggravating factor for the imposition of 

the death penalty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That section 3592(c) of title 18, United States Code, is 

4 amended by inserting after paragraph (16) the following: 

5 ‘‘(17) KILLING OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFI6 CER.—The defendant killed or attempted to kill a 

7 person who is authorized by law— 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3209 IH

1 ‘‘(A) to engage in or supervise the preven2 tion, detention, investigation, or prosecution of 

3 any criminal violation of law; 

4 ‘‘(B) to arrest or prosecute an individual 

5 for any criminal violation of law; or 

6 ‘‘(C) to be a firefighter or other first re7 sponder.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 24, 2021

No. 04-21-00011-CV

Amanda WOOD and C.E.W., Jr.,

Appellants

v.

Kenneth VERNON, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Katrina Fuller, 

Family Endeavors, Inc.,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI10235

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was originally due by February 15, 2021, but was not filed. On 

February 22, 2021, the district clerk filed a notification of late record, stating that the clerk’s 

record was not filed because appellants had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s 

fee for preparing the record and that appellants were not entitled to appeal without paying the 

fee. 

We therefore ORDER that appellants provide written proof to this court that either (1) 

the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) 

appellants are entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee by March 5, 2021. If appellants

fail to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of February, 2021.
___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the "Report")
of AMCON Distributing Company (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2006, I, Christopher H. Atayan, Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: January 29, 2007

                            /s/ Christopher H. Atayan
                            ------------------------------
                            Christopher H. Atayan,
                            Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to AMCON Distributing Company and will be retained by AMCON
Distributing Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### Vincent L., Jr., an Infant by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Chanel T., et al., Appellants-Respondents, v AKS 183rd St. Realty Corp., Respondent, and 1211 Wheeler LLC, Respondent-Appellant.

[988 NYS2d 623]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered September 19, 2012, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendants’ answers to the extent of precluding defendant 1211 Wheeler LLC (Wheeler) from introducing evidence that it lacked notice of a hazardous lead paint condition, and denied Wheeler’s motion to compel plaintiffs to produce authorizations for the medical and educational records of the infant plaintiff’s nonparty siblings, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to grant plaintiffs’ motion to the extent of striking Wheeler’s answer, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

During the pendency of a stay of this action, Wheeler sold the premises where the infant plaintiff was allegedly exposed to lead, and all the building records and tenant files were lost. We find that since the loss of these records deprived plaintiffs of the *603means of establishing their prima facie case, the extreme sanction of striking Wheeler’s answer is warranted *(see e.g. Gray v Jaeger,*17 AD3d 286 [1st Dept 2005]; *see also Herrera v Mattin,*303 AD2d 198 [1st Dept 2003]).

We agree with the motion court that defendant AKS 183rd St. Realty Corp. substantially complied with discovery notices and orders.

Wheeler failed to demonstrate its entitlement to the medical and academic records of the infant plaintiffs nonparty siblings *(see Vazquez v New York City Hous. Auth.,*79 AD3d 623 [1st Dept 2010]; *Monica W. v Milevoi,*252 AD2d 260, 262 [1st Dept 1999]).

In any event, plaintiff mother did not waive the physician-patient privilege with respect to the siblings’ medical records *(see*CPLR 4504 [a]).

Concur—Sweeny, J.E, Renwick, Andrias, Saxe and Kapnick, JJ.
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.      SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September                30, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the                “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the                end of                the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations                of the                Company for the period covered by the Periodic                Report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Peter A. Michel   Peter                A. Michel Chief                Executive Officer   | /s/ David G. Vana                   David G. Vana Chief                Financial                Officer |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Brent Santha, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: April 26, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Brent SanthaName: Brent SanthaTitle: Chief Financial Officer
Opinion issued September 3, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00142-CR

———————————

WILLIE FELDER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1172613

MEMORANDUM OPINION
2

Appellant, Willie Felder, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The 

motion complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in the appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We 

dismiss any pending motions as moot.

We direct the Clerk to issue the mandate within 10 days of the date of this 

opinion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF J.H. III, 

 

A CHILD.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-15-00001-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court 

Of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2013DCM2786) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and his sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Hughes, J., Not Participating
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-309   -      -CV

IN RE InN rReE MeElLcChHoOrR M. BoOoOnNeE, M.D.	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL bB :   WALKER, LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHIINOT, JJ.ONOT, 

DELIVERED:  July 2930, 2008