alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michael Salvati Consultant Agreement


    


    


    October
      5, 2006

    


    John
      Horton, CEO

    Lazy
      Days’ R.V. Center, Inc.

    6130
      Lazy
      Days Drive

    Seffner,
      FL 33584-2968

    


    RE:
      Consulting Fee

    


    Michael,

    


    In
      keeping with our recent discussions, the following consulting fee arrangement
      has been agreed to, effective October 5, 2006.

    


    
      	·  	
              Consulting
                fee will be paid at a daily rate in the amount of $2000 for each
                day
                worked at the request of the
                company.

            


    

    


    
      	·  	
              An
                invoice for consulting fees incurred during a calendar month (including
                a
                disclosure of the days worked during such month) will be provided
                to John
                Horton no later than the 5th
                day of the following month. Payment will be made within 10 days of
                the
                receipt of such invoice.

            


    

    


    
      	·  	
              Services
                provided shall include financial staff evaluation, assessing and
                interviewing candidates for the position of Chief Financial Officer,
                monthly review of financial statements, and implementation assistance
                for
                the new enterprise resources management
                system.

            


    

    


    
      	·  	
              This
                arrangement can be terminated by either party with 3 business days
                notice.

            


    

    


    


    /s/
      Michael Salvati

    Michael
      Salvati

    October
      5, 2006

    


    /s/
      John Horton

    John
      Horton, CEO

    October
      5, 2006
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00970-CR

John Anthony MORALES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR5655

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED January 9, 2019.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Summary of Company's Non-Employee Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.25 
  
 SUMMARY OF THE COMPANY’S NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
  
 Non-employee directors are paid an annual retainer of $40,000 and fees of
$2,500 for each Board meeting attended, $1,000 for each committee meeting attended and $1,000 for certain telephone meetings. In addition, the Presiding Director, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, the Chairman of the Corporate Governance
Committee and the Chairman of the Executive Compensation Committee each are paid $5,000 per annum for their services as such. Other members of the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee and the Executive Compensation Committee each are
paid $2,500 per annum for their services as such. All directors are reimbursed for their expenses related to attendance at meetings. 
  
 In accordance with the Company’s 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, each non-employee director who is a director at the annual meeting of
stockholders receives an automatic grant of an option to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the closing price immediately prior to the date of grant. Upon becoming a director, each non-employee director is granted an
option to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the closing price of Common Stock on the trading date immediately prior to the date of grant. Each such option expires ten years after the date of grant and becomes
exercisable in three equal annual installments beginning on the first day of the month of each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. If the director ceases to be a director prior to the date the option becomes fully exercisable, the
unvested portion of the option will immediately expire. Any vested options will remain exercisable for a period of one year following cessation of service as a director of the Company. All unexercised options will become exercisable in full
beginning 20 days prior to the consummation of a merger or consolidation, acquisition, reorganization or liquidation and, to the extent not exercised, shall terminate immediately after the consummation of such merger, consolidation, acquisition,
reorganization or liquidation. Except as the Board may otherwise determine, options granted to non-employee directors are not transferable.
|        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)    | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                                                                  |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

|                           |                               |        |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:  February 28, 2011 | /s/ Gregory E. Abel           |   |
|                      | Gregory E. Abel               |   |
|                      | President                     |   |
|                      | (principal executive officer) |   |
Order entered August 27 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00369
- CV
SATFRAZ TAJ AND ZUBE DA TAJ, Appellant s

V. HIGHLANDER COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INVEST MENT, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366
- 02669
- 2018



### O RDER Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY as moot appellee’s August 26, 2019
motion to dismiss and VACATE our April 1 , 2019 order enjoining appellee from proceeding with the sale of the property that is the subject of the underlying litigation or otherwise dispossessing appellant of the property

.
/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
Exhibit 16.1



                              INTERMOST CORPORATION

                                  May 21, 2007

E. RANDALL GRUBER, CPA, PC 1025 Marions Cove Drive Lake Saint Louis, Missouri
63367

     Re:  Change of certifying accountant pursuant to Regulation SK, Section
          304(a)(3)

Dear Mr. Gruber:

         Pursuant to resolutions passed by the Board of Directors on May 15,
2007, we have changed our independent auditors and will no longer be requiring
your services.

         Enclosed is a copy of the Form 10-QSB which we are filing today with
the US Securities Exchange Commission. Pursuant to Regulation SK, Section
304(a)(3) we herewith request that your firm furnish us with a letter, addressed
to the SEC, stating whether your firm agrees with the statements made in the
disclosure set out as Item 5 in the Form 10-QSB and, if not, stating the
respects in which your firm does not agree.

         Please provide this letter as promptly as possible so that we can file
the letter with the SEC within ten (10) business days of the filing of the Form
10-QSB.

         Your firm may provide us with an interim letter highlighting specific
areas of concern and indicating a subsequent, more detailed letter will be
forthcoming within the ten (10) business days noted above.

         We look forward to your timely response to this request.


                                                     Very truly yours,

                                                     Intermost Corporation


                                                     By: /s/DENG XIANG XIONG
                                                         Deng Xiang Xiong
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
Order entered September 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01599-CR

PATRICK DEYONE LEE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-80455-2014

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s September 9, 2015 motion to extend time to file its brief. 

We ORDER the State’s brief filed as the date of this order. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
[No. 68394-2-I.

Division One.

October 8, 2012.]

#### Martinus Tillman, *Respondent,*v. The Department of Licensing, *Petitioner.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 10-2-35499-9, Suzanne M. Barnett, J., entered December 5, 2011. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 32.1

TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Thomas A. Hyde, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report is in full compliance with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Thomas A. Hyde, Jr.
|Thomas A. Hyde, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer
|September 13, 2006
Exhibit-23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
AMCON Distributing Company on Form S-8, filed on September 7, 2000, of our
reports dated January 7, 2005 (August 19, 2005, as to the effects of the
subsequent event discussed in Note 19, August 19, 2005 as to the effects of
the restatement discussed in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 of Note 22, and November
28, 2005 as to the effects of the restatement discussed in paragraph 4 of
Note 22) which reports express an unqualified opinion and include explanatory
paragraphs relating to the change in method of accounting for goodwill and
intangibles assets in 2003 and the restatements of the Company's consolidated
financial statements discussed in Note 22, appearing in and incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) of AMCON
Distributing Company and subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended September 24,
2004.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Omaha, Nebraska

November 28, 2005
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

ROMALIS GRAY v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, et

al.

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Morgan County

No. 11-159 Hon. Frank V. Williams, III., Chancellor

No. E2012-00426-COA-R3-CV-FILED-MAY 18, 2012

Tenn. R. App. P.3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

HERSCHEL PICKENS FRANKS, P.J., CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., and D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J.

Romalis Gray, Henning, Tennessee, pro se.

Dianne Stamey Dycus, and James Lee Pope, Nashville, Tennessee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

1

Appellant, Romalis Gray, pro se, filed a Notice of Appeal in this Court and Motions.

On April 19, 2012 this Court ordered the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not

be dismissed and recites that the record reveals that the Notice of Appeal was not filed within

30 days following the Final Judgment in the Trial Court.

Appellant wrote a letter to the Court which essentially acknowledges that his Notice

of Appeal was not timely filed with the Court.

Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides: "This Court, with the concurrence of all

1

judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum

opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum

opinion it shall be designated 'MEMORANDUM OPINION,' shall not be published, and shall not be cited

or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case"
An untimely notice of appeal deprives this Court of jurisdiction. See,

Tenn.R.App.P.2; Tenn.R.App.P.4(a); also see, Cobb v. Beier, 944 S.W.2d 343, 344 n.2

(Tenn. 1997).

It is therefore Ordered and Adjudged that this appeal be and hereby is dismissed. The

cost of the appeal is assessed to Romalis Gray.

PER CURIAM

-2-
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Emergency Filtration Products, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Steve M. Hanni
Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[No. 41309-4-II.

Division Two.

October 24, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Scott P. Leshowitz, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pacific County, No. 09-1-00190-0, Michael J. Sullivan, J., entered October 8, 2010. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per

Penoyar, J.,

concurred in by Johanson, A.C.J., and Armstrong, J.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

| (1)    | the                Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended                December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934                (15                U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                            |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |

| Dated:                March 1, 2007 | /s/                Thomas B. Specketer       |   |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                     | Thomas                B. Specketer           |   |
|                                     | Vice                President and Controller |   |
|                                     | (chief                financial officer)     |   |

----
II 

Calendar No. 385 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3250 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1210 West Main Street in Riverhead, New 

York, as the ‘‘Private First Class Garfield M. Langhorn 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS GARFIELD M. 

4 LANGHORN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1210 West Main Street in 

7 Riverhead, New York, shall be known and designated as 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3250 RS

1 the ‘‘Private First Class Garfield M. Langhorn Post Office 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Private First Class 

7 Garfield M. Langhorn Post Office Building’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 385 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3250 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Posting’’. Class Garfield M. Langhorn Post Office Build- Riverhead, New York, as the ‘‘Private First al Service located at 1210 West Main Street in 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 of Dutch Gold Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Keaveney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  May 24, 2011





/s/ Tom Leahey


Tom Leahey, Chief Financial Officer


(principal accounting officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Douglas E. Sloan, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report is in full compliance with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|                                        
|/s/ Douglas E. Sloan                    
|Douglas E. Sloan Chief Financial
Officer

November 24, 2008
EXHIBIT 15.1




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-85090, 333-108896, 333-110486, 333-131315, 333-140174, 333-141640, 333-148747,  333-163196, 333-169389, 333-169491, 333-171912, 333-178166, 333-181805 and 333-187858 on Form F-3, and Nos. 33-80947, 333-06482, 333-11720, 333-83204, 333-107943, 333-117565, 333-138837, 333-147071, 333-153710, 333-166428, 333-174276, and 333-178167 on Form S-8, of our reports dated February 21, 2013, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (the "Company") and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012.




/s/ Brightman Almagor Zohar &Co





Brightman Almagor Zohar &Co.


Certified Public Accountants


A member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu





Tel Aviv, Israel


February 3, 2014
#### Ron GEHRLEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HORIZON SCIENCE ACADEMY-DENISON MIDDLE SCHOOL, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 09-4523.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 3, 2011.

*595BEFORE: NORRIS, COLE, and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Ron Gehrlein appeals from the magistrate’s award of summary judgment to defendant Horizon Science Academy-Denison Middle School, Inc. In 2008, plaintiff sued Horizon alleging discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621, *et seq.;*and state law claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and punitive damages. The parties consented to have the case heard by a magistrate judge, who granted summary judgment for the defendant on all issues. ■

Having had the benefit of oral argument and having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the magistrate judge erred in granting summary judgment to the defendant.

Because the reasoning which supports judgment for defendant has been articulated by the magistrate judge, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court serves no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by the magistrate judge in his Opinion and Order filed on November 16, 2009, 2011 WL 3837014.