alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 24.3

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of
Mymetics Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, does make, constitute and appoint
John M. Musacchio, with full power and authority, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, for him and his name, place and stead in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report of Mymetics Corporation on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002, and to file such Annual Report, so signed,
with all exhibits thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby
further granting unto said attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and
perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do
in person, the undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorney
and agent shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE UNDERSIGNED HAS HEREUNTO SET HIS HAND AND SEAL
THIS 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2003.

                                     /s/ MICHAEL K. ALLIO
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Michael K. Allio, Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7898

BRUCE W. KOENIG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GARY MAYNARD, Secretary; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Deputy 

Secretary; JON P. GALLEY, Director; RANDY WATSON; BOBBY 

SHEARIN, Warden; DAVID WADE, Assistant Warden; LIEUTENANT 

PENNINGTON, Housing Unit Manager; SERGEANT BOWMAN, Housing 

Unit Supervisor; SERGEANT SOWERS; LIEUTENANT HARBAUGH, 

Housing Unit Manager; SERGEANT ZAIN; GAZY SINDY; RANDY 

DURST; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER II DORCON; SCOTT OAKLEY, 

Executive Director; ROBIN WODFORD,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

THOMAS DEWBERRY; JEROME WOODS, II; UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES AND 

FORMER EMPLOYEES,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:12-cv-01088-JFM)

Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 21, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Bruce Wayne Koenig, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane 

Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, 

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Wayne Koenig appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and 

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Koenig v. Maynard, 

No. 1:12-cv-01088-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 6, 2013; Oct. 28, 2013). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

STATE OFFICE OF RISK

MANAGEMENT,

Appellant,

v.

MARIA E. OLIVAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00071

- CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso Co unty, Texas

(TC # 2012

- DCV

- 01609 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5 , on the judgment and all

costs, both in this Court and the court below for which let execution issue. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2 7 TH DAY OF MAY , 2016

.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15314 and #15315; Georgia Disaster Number GA-
00100]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Georgia

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Georgia
    (FEMA-4338-DR), dated 09/15/2017.
    Incident: Hurricane Irma.
    Incident Period: 09/07/2017 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 09/26/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/14/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/15/2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Georgia, dated 09/15/2017, is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Charlton, 
Coffee
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Georgia: Atkinson, Bacon, Ben Hill, Berrien, Irwin, Jeff Davis, 
Telfair, Ware
    Florida: Baker

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-21453 Filed 10-4-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

,

v

.

SATDIEL JEREMY DOMINGUEZ

,

Appellee

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 21

- 00 036

- C R

Appeal from the

11 2 th District Court

of P ecos C ounty, Texas

(TC# P

- 3968

- 112

- CR )

O R D E R

The companion mandamus In Re: The State of Texas , cause no. 08

- 21

- 00106

- CR, was

resolved on June 30, 2021. The refore, the appeal is reinstated, and the State’s brief is now due

July 31, 2021

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 st day of July , 20 2 1

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
EXHIBIT
23








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-142663 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 27, 2008 (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating
to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158,
“Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R),” as of
December 31, 2006), relating to the financial statements and the financial
statement schedule of MidAmerican Energy Company, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of MidAmerican Energy Company for the year ended
December 31, 2007.








/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP





Des
Moines, Iowa


February 27,
2008
<PAGE>


                                                                EXHIBIT 10.49.02


                    SECOND AMENDMENT TO SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT

         THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") dated
the 13th day of November, 2000, by and among eUNIVERSE, INC., a Nevada
corporation ("eUniverse"), TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC., a Delaware
corporation ("T2") and BRAD D GREENSPAN, an individual residing in Los Angeles,
California ("Greenspan").

                                    RECITALS:

         1.   eUniverse, T2 and Greenspan have executed that certain Side
              Letter Agreement dated October 30, 2000 (the "Agreement"), as
              amended by First Amendment to Side Letter Agreement dated
              November 6, 2000; and

         2.   The parties desire to further amend the Agreement as set forth
              herein.

                                   AGREEMENT:

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements
contained in the Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
hereby agree as follows:

1. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT. The Agreement is hereby amended by extending the
Closing date in the first sentence of the first paragraph of Section 5 (General
Provisions) from November 13, 2000 to November 22, 2000. For the avoidance of
doubt, the parties hereto hereby extend the Closing date to on or before, but to
no later than, November 22, 2000, and confirm that the Closing of the Agreement
is contingent upon the consummation of the Closing of that certain Letter
Agreement dated October 30, 2000 by and among eUniverse, T2 and Charles Beilman,
as amended by First Amendment to Letter Agreement dated November 6, 2000, by no
later than November 22, 2000.

2. MISCELLANEOUS.

         A. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall
have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

         B. Except as otherwise provided herein, the terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this
Amendment to be duly executed by their respective authorized representatives the
day and year first above written.


TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.


By: /s/ Ryan A. Brant
   -----------------------------------           /s/ Brad D. Greenspan
Name: Ryan A. Brant                              -------------------------------
Its:  Chief Executive Officer                    Brad D. Greenspan


eUNIVERSE, INC.

By: /s/ Brett Brewer
   -----------------------------------
Name: Brett Brewer
Its:  Co-President
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 3, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
137594 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ ____________________________ Stephen J. Markman, J ustices In re CHRISTOPHER SEGAR, THOMAS SEGAR, and ERIC SEGAR, Minors.

_____________ ____________________________ DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 137594 COA: 284817 Clare CC Family Division: 07-000221-NA JOSEPH SEGAR, Respondent-Appellant,

and

TINA SEGAR, Respondent.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s1125 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 3, 2008

Clerk
Marathon Oil Corporation, Marathon Oil EF LLC, and Plains Exploration & Producing



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 24, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00650

- CV

Micha el A. C ERNY and Myra L. Cerny, Individually and as Next Friends of Cameron A. Cerny, A Child

, Appellants

v. Marathon Oil Corporation, Marathon Oil EF LLC, and Plains Exploration & Producing s

M ARATHON OIL CORPORATION

, Marathon Oil EF LLC, and Plains Exploration & Producing Company, Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court

, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 05

- 00118

- CVK

Honorable Stella Saxon , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Mar tinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice 1

The Court has considered the Motion for Rehearing filed by Appellants , Michael A. Cerny and Myra L. Cerny, Individually and as Next Friend of Cameron A. Cerny, a Child

, and

the motion is DENIED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Jus tice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of November, 2015

.

1 Dissents to the denial of the motion for rehearing without requesting a response. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.2.___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

C lerk of Court
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2738 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide travel expenses for family 

caregivers accompanying veterans to medical treatment facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2009 

Mr. TEAGUE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide travel 

expenses for family caregivers accompanying veterans to 

medical treatment facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LODGING AND SUBSISTENCE FOR FAMILY 

4 CAREGIVERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 111(e) of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘When any’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

8 When any’’; 

9 (2) in paragraph (1), as designated by para10 graph (1) of this subsection— 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2738 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘(other than an employee 

2 of the Department)’’ and inserting ‘‘, including 

3 a family caregiver (as defined in section 

4 1701(11)) and excluding an employee of the 

5 Department,’’; 

6 (B) by inserting ‘‘(including lodging and 

7 subsistence)’’ after ‘‘expenses of travel’’; and 

8 (C) by inserting before the period at the 

9 end the following: ‘‘during— 

10 ‘‘(A) the period of time in which such per11 son is traveling to and from a treatment facil12 ity; and 

13 ‘‘(B) the duration of the treatment episode 

14 for such person’’; and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

16 paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(2) The Secretary may prescribe regulations to 

18 carry out this subsection. Such regulations may in19 clude provisions— 

20 ‘‘(A) to limit the number of attendants 

21 that may receive expenses of travel under para22 graph (1) for a single treatment episode of a 

23 person; and 

24 ‘‘(B) to require attendants to use certain 

25 travel services.’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2738 IH

1 (b) DEFINITION OF FAMILY CAREGIVER.—Section 

2 1701 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by add3 ing at the end the following new paragraphs: 

4 ‘‘(10) The term ‘caregiver services’ means non5 institutional extended care (as used in section 

6 1701(6) of this title), including homemaker and 

7 home health aid services. 

8 ‘‘(11) The term ‘family caregiver’ means an in9 dividual who— 

10 ‘‘(A) is a member of the family (including 

11 parents, spouses, children, siblings, step-family 

12 members, and extended family members) of a 

13 disabled veteran; 

14 ‘‘(B) provides caregiver services to such 

15 veteran for such disability; and 

16 ‘‘(C) may or may not reside with such vet17 eran.’’. 

18 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 111 of 

19 title 38, United States Code, is further amended— 

20 (1) in subsection (d)(3), by inserting ‘‘(includ21 ing a family caregiver defined in section 1701)’’ 

22 after ‘‘attendant’’; and 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
4 

•HR 2738 IH

1 (2) in subsection (f), by inserting ‘‘(including a 

2 family caregiver defined in section 1701)’’ after ‘‘at3 tendants’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-09-00298-CV

No. 10-09-00299-CV

No. 10-09-00300-CV

No. 10-09-00301-CV

No. 10-09-00302-CV

BOBBY RAY CHILDERS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2007-1586-C1, 2008-165-C1,

2008-462-C1, 2008-463-C1 and 2008-466-C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Bobby Ray Childers filed notices of restricted appeal in these five 

causes relating to orders in the underlying criminal cases for the payment of court costs 

out of Appellant’s inmate account pursuant to Texas Government Code section 501.014. 
Childers v. State Page 2

The orders being appealed were signed on January 26, 2009. Appellant’s notices of 

restricted appeal were filed on September 14, 2009.

In a restricted appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed within six months after 

the order is signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(c). We notified Appellant by letter that it 

appeared that we lack jurisdiction over these appeals because timely notices of appeal 

were not filed as to the January 26, 2009 orders. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a), (c). We 

further notified Appellant that we would dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction 

unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals. Appellant 

filed a response that concedes the untimeliness of his notices of appeal and that presents 

no basis for continuing the appeals.

We dismiss these appeals for lack of jurisdiction. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed November 18, 2009

[CV06]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ivan Maestre, Appellant.

[986 NYS2d 481]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Megan Tallmer, J.), entered on or about March 14, 2013, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a sufficient total point score to support a level three sexually violent offender adjudication.

The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure *(see People v Cintron,*12 NY3d 60, 70 [2009], *cert denied*558 US 1011 [2009]; *People v Johnson,*11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]). Defendant did not demonstrate any mitigating factors, not already taken into account in the risk assessment instrument, that would warrant a downward departure, given the seriousness of the underlying conduct committed against a child. While conceding that the court properly assessed points for unsatisfactory conduct while confined *(see People v Perez,*104 AD3d 403 [1st Dept 2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 858 [2013]; *People v Salley,*67 AD3d 525 [1st Dept 2009], *lv denied*14 NY3d 703 [2010]), defendant argues that the court should have exercised its discretion to assess fewer than 20 points. However, defendant would have remained a level three offender even if the court had not assessed any points under that factor. In any event, the assessment of 20 points was appropriate.

Concur—Friedman, J.E, Acosta, Saxe, Feinman and Gische, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications
  The
undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Digital
Animation Development, Inc.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Digital Animation Development, Inc. and will be retained by China Digital
Animation Development, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 October
      20, 2009
              /s/ Fu
      QiangFu
      Qiang (Chief Executive Officer)October
      20, 2009
              /s/ Hu
      YumeiHu
      Yumei (Chief Financial Officer)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Equity Corporation International ("the Company") on Form S-3 (File No.
333-4436), Form S-4 (File No. 33-92876) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-98052 and
333-25303) of our reports dated March 5, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of the Company as of
December 31, 1997, and 1996 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1997, which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

                                            COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Houston, Texas
March 27, 1998
#### Eugene W. Sinn, Jr., et al., Respondents-Appellants, v Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Narinsamy K. Govender, Also Known as Narain K. Govender, et al., Defendants-Respondents.

[666 NYS2d 89]

—Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We agree with defendant that Supreme Court erred in awarding plaintiffs interest on the entire award of damages. The insurance policy at issue is not more generous than that required by regulation, and thus defendant must pay interest only on the limit of the insurance policy, not on the entire award of damages *(see,*11 NYCRR 60-1.1 [b]; *Dingle v Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.,*85 NY2d 657, 660-661). The court, however, properly directed that interest be calculated from the date on which the order of default was entered, because that order established defendant’s liability *(see, Love v State of New York,*78 NY2d 540). We therefore modify the order and judgment by awarding plaintiffs interest only on the $50,000 policy limit. (Appeals from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Cornelius, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.
H_____________ OGAN 

____________________ & HOGAN

APPELLATE ADVOCACY AND TRIAL STRATEGY

PENNZOIL PLACE

711 LOUISIANA • SUITE 500 

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002 

JENNIFER BRUCH HOGAN Telephone: (713) 222-8800 

Board Certified • Civil Appellate Law Facsimile: (713) 222-8810 

Texas Board of Legal Specialization 

45431_1 

February 5, 2015 

Via TexFile 

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

301 Fannin, Room 245 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Re: No. 01-14-00850-CV; In Re State Farm Lloyds, et al.; in the First 

Court of Appeals, Houston, Texas. 

Dear Mr. Prine: 

Please note that Jennifer Bruch Hogan will present the oral argument on 

behalf of Rosie Hansen, Real-Party-In-Interest. The oral argument is set for 

Wednesday, February 11, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. 

All counsel are being notified by electronic service. Thank you for your 

assistance. 

 Sincerely, 

 /s Jennifer Bruch Hogan 

 Jennifer Bruch Hogan 

 Attorney for Real-Party-In-Interest, 

Rosie Hansen 

JBH/jlc 

ACCEPTED

01-14-00850-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

2/5/2015 12:33:44 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/5/2015 12:33:44 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
February 5, 2015

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Page 2

45431_1

c:

Dale M. “Rett” Holidy

GERMER, PLLC

Three Allen Center

333 Clay Street, Suite 4950

Houston, Texas 77002

Via TexFile

M. Micah Kessler

NISTICO, CROUCH & KESSLER, P.C.

1900 West Loop South, Suite 800

Houston, Texas 77027

Via TexFile

J. Steve Mostyn

THE MOSTYN LAW FIRM

3810 W. Alabama

Houston, Texas 77027

Via TexFile