alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15350 and #15351; Wisconsin Disaster Number WI-00063]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Wisconsin (FEMA-4343-DR), dated 10/07/2017. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides. *Incident Period:*
                         07/19/2017 through 07/23/2017.
 DATES: Issued on 10/07/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/06/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/09/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 10/07/2017, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Buffalo, Crawford, Grant, Iowa, Jackson, La Crosse, Lafayette, Monroe, Richland, Trempealeau, Vernon The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15350B and for economic injury is 153510. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2017-22521 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
  I, Víctor J. Galán, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of R&G FinancialCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2004 /s/ VICTOR J. GALANVíctor J. GalánChief Executive Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3004 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

gain from the conversion of property by reason of eminent domain. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2009 

Mr. GINGREY of Georgia (for himself, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. KING of 

Iowa, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. PAULSEN, Ms. FALLIN, Mr. BARTLETT, 

Mr. PITTS, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. 

BONNER, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. JONES, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. WAMP, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. NUNES, and Mr. SMITH of 

Nebraska) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income gain from the conversion of property 

by reason of eminent domain. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eminent Domain Tax 

5 Relief Act of 2009’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3004 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR GAIN FROM 

2 DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY BY REASON OF 

3 EMINENT DOMAIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap5 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 

6 items specifically excluded from gross income) is amended 

7 by inserting after section 139C the following new section: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 139D. GAIN FROM DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY BY 

9 REASON OF EMINENT DOMAIN. 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Gross income shall not include 

11 gain from the conversion (or threat or imminence thereof) 

12 of property in the United States by reason of the exercise 

13 of eminent domain by a governmental unit having the 

14 power to exercise eminent domain. 

15 ‘‘(b) COORDINATION WITH OTHER NONRECOGNI16 TION PROVISIONS.— 

17 ‘‘(1) GAIN.—Gain excluded under subsection 

18 (a) shall not be treated as gain recognized or an 

19 amount realized for purposes of sections 467, 

20 637(d), 1033, 1245, 1250, 1252, 1254, 1255, and 

21 1402. 

22 ‘‘(2) SECTION 1231.—Section 1231 shall be ap23 plied without regard to this section. 

24 ‘‘(3) HOLDING PERIOD.—Section 1223(1) shall 

25 not apply. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3004 IH

1 ‘‘(c) ELECTION NOT TO CLAIM CREDIT.—This sec2 tion shall not apply to a taxpayer for any taxable year 

3 if such taxpayer elects to have this section not apply for 

4 such taxable year.’’. 

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

6 for such part is amended by inserting after the item relat7 ing to section 139C the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 139D. Gain from disposition of property by reason of eminent domain.’’. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### Aaron J. Rosen et al., Plaintiffs, v City of New York et al., Defendants. New York City Transit Authority et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v NAB Construction Corporation, Third-Party Defendant, and National Union Fire Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 594]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered on or about November 1, 1996, which, in a third-party action seeking a declaration that third-party defendant insurer is obligated to defend and indemnify third-party plaintiffs additional insureds in an underlying action for personal injuries, insofar as appealed from as limited by the insurer’s brief, denied the insurer’s cross motion for summary judgment declaring that it is not so obligated, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

*203As the IAS Court pertinently noted, the insurer, asserting lack of timely notice, disclaimed coverage of the additional insureds before the latter had asserted any claims against the primary insured. Therefore, at the time of such disclaimer, the notice given by the primary insured was applicable as well to the additional insureds *(see, National Union Fire Ins. Co. v Insurance Co.,*188 AD2d 259, 261, *lv denied*81 NY2d 709). Nor does the insurer demonstrate any prejudice attributable to the additional insureds’ late notice or other “sound reason” for excusing its performance *(Unigard Sec. Ins. Co. v North Riv. Ins. Co.,*79 NY2d 576, 584). Accordingly, the determinative issue is the timeliness of the notice provided by the primary insured, as to which disclosure is needed. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2978 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2978

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the maximum age to 
 qualify for coverage as a ``child'' under the health benefits program 
                         for Federal employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2009

    Mr. Davis of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Moran of 
 Virginia, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Sarbanes, Ms. Norton, and Mr. Connolly of 
  Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the maximum age to 
 qualify for coverage as a ``child'' under the health benefits program 
                         for Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AGE TO QUALIFY FOR COVERAGE AS A 
              ``CHILD''.

    (a) In General.--Section 8901(5) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
        ``22 years of age'' and inserting ``25 years of age''; and
            (2) in the matter following subparagraph (B), by striking 
        ``age 22'' and inserting ``age 25''.
    (b) Self and Family Coverage for a Former Spouse.--Section 
8905(c)(2)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``22 years of age'' and 
        inserting ``25 years of age''; and
            (2) in clause (ii), by striking ``age 22'' and inserting 
        ``age 25''.
    (c) Effective Date.--This Act and the amendments made by this Act--
            (1) shall take effect on the first day of the first 
        contract year beginning at least 180 days after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act; and
            (2) shall apply with respect to health care services or 
        supplies provided on or after the date on which this Act takes 
        effect.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4417

_____________________________

STEPHEN LAMONT EARLY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County.

William E. Davis, Judge.

February 20, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Stephen Lamont Early, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 31, 2013

NO. 03-11-00598-CR

Cortez Williams, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 147TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered on September 15, 2011. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgments of conviction. However, the trial court’s judgments of conviction 

in this case are modified to reflect that the sex offender registration requirements of Chapter 62 

of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure apply to Williams and to reflect that the age of the 

victim at the time of the offense was 13 years. In addition, the judgment of conviction for 

indecency with a child by exposure is modified to reflect that the “Statute for Offense” is 

21.11(a)(2)(B) of the Penal Code. As so modified, the trial court’s judgments of conviction are 

affirmed. It is further ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made.
[No. 42866-1-II.

Division Two.

October 24, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Collins S. Williams, Jr., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 11-1-01356-5, Paula Casey, J., entered November 7, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Penoyar, J.,

concurred in by Hunt and Van Deren, JJ.
EXHIBIT 21.1



                            MATTSON TECHNOLOGY, INC.


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                           Mattson International, Inc.

                             Mattson Technology LLC

                           Mattson Wet Products, Inc.

                         Mattson Thermal Products, Inc.

                             Steag CVD Systems, Ltd.

                      Mattson Technology Center KK (Japan)

                         Mattson International Korea Co.

                    Mattson Technology of Singapore Pte. Ltd.

                   Mattson International Inc. (Taiwan Branch)

                Steag Electronic Systems SE Asia Pte. Ltd. Taiwan

                         Mattson Technology Holding GmbH

                           Mattson International GmbH

                         Mattson Thermal Products, GmbH

                           Mattson Semiconductor GmbH

                        Mattson International France SARL

                         Mattson Technology UK Ltd. (UK)

                          Mattson Technology srl Italy

             Steag Electronic Systems SE Asia Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)

                        Steag Electronic Systems UK Ltd.

                      Mattson Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

                    Mattson Technology Cayman Holdings, Ltd.
[Nos. 67469-2-I; 67505-2-I; 67555-9-I.

Division One.

November 13, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Christopher Colen Bingham et al., *Appellants.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 10-1-09777-1, James D. Cayce, J., entered July 22, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Becker, J.,

concurred in by Grosse and Dwyer, JJ.
#### Esminia E. Harris et al., Respondents, v Textron, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[666 NYS2d 70]

—Order unanimously reversed without costs as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings. Memorandum: Defendants appeal from an order of Supreme Court granting plaintiffs discovery of materials relevant to a string trimmer/brush cutter manufactured by defendant Tex-tron, Inc. Defendants contend that plaintiffs’ discovery request and the court’s order directing disclosure are over-broad and unduly burdensome. We agree.

Plaintiffs are entitled to information and documentation relevant to the issue whether the equipment was defective or dangerous for its intended use. Defendants contend that the string trimmer/brush cutter was originally designed for professional use, but was modified to the design purchased by plaintiffs for home use. Because of the wide-ranging demands of plaintiffs, we conclude that a Referee should be appointed to supervise discovery *(see,*CPLR 3104 [a], [b]). Therefore, we reverse the order and remit the matter to Supreme Court for appointment of a Referee *(see, Whalen v Kawasaki Motors Corp.,*175 AD2d 667). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sconiers, J.—Discovery.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS    MATTSON TECHNOLOGY, INC.    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I,
David Dutton, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mattson Technology, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: March 22, 2005 |  | /s/DAVID DUTTONDavid Dutton President and Chief Executive
Officer
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                             0
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   0
<PP&E>                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              875
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           50
<OTHER-SE>                         (925)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       0
<SALES>                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   0
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      1,758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (1,758)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                0
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (1,758)
<EPS-BASIC>                        0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.00





</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          31,107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,779
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,609
<PP&E>                                           4,801
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            79
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,987
<SALES>                                          3,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,371
<CGS>                                            1,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   449
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,545)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,545)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,024)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.56)


</TABLE>