alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           34091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 35077
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  122987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            50519
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         60354
<OTHER-SE>                                     (72552)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    122987
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    21
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 42443
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (25510)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (25510)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2

 



 

 

 

December 21, 2014

 

Lewis C. Pell

40 Ramland Road

Orangeburg, New York 10962

 

 

Re:  Termination of Letter Agreement

 

Dear Mr. Pell:

 

 

Reference is made to that certain letter regarding maintenance of liquidity addressed by you to Vision Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) dated October 24, 2014 (the “Letter”).

 

This letter will confirm our agreement that the Letter will terminate automatically effective at the Effective Time as defined in the Agreement And Plan Of Merger by and among Visor Merger Sub LLC, the Company and Uroplasty, Inc. dated as of the date hereof. 

 

	
 
	
Sincerely, 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Vision-Sciences, Inc.  

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By: 
	
/s/ Howard Zauberman

	
 
	
 
	
Howard Zauberman, President and CEO 




 

	
Acknowledged and agreed: 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
/s/ Lewis C. Pell
	
 

	Lewis C. Pell
Exhibit 23.2

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-90860 and No. 333-75255) of the Featherlite Inc.
1994 Stock Option Plan and Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-65647) of
our report, dated February 8, 1999, on the consolidated financial statements of
Featherlite Inc., which report is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1999.




                                           /s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP


Rochester, Minnesota
  March 23, 2000
Exhibit 32.2  Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Entheos Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel Rayat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  ENTHEOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date: May 14, 2007By:/s/ Harmel RayatHarmel Rayat
Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3173 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3173

 To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the 
          importation and shipment of certain species of carp.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2009

Mrs. Biggert (for herself, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Davis of Kentucky, Mrs. Bono 
 Mack, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Schock, Mr. Dent, Mr. Souder, Mr. Lance, Mr. 
Roskam, Mr. Shimkus, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Lee of New 
   York, and Mr. Culberson) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the 
          importation and shipment of certain species of carp.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Asian Carp Prevention and Control 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ADDITION OF SPECIES OF CARP TO THE LIST OF INJURIOUS SPECIES 
              THAT ARE PROHIBITED FROM BEING IMPORTED OR SHIPPED.

    Section 42(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``of the bighead carp of the species Hypophthalmichthys 
nobilis;'' after ``Dreissena polymorpha;''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3072 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 236
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3072

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           December 17, 2009

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 9810 Halls Ferry Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Coach Jodie 
                     Bailey Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COACH JODIE BAILEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9810 Halls Ferry Road in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Coach Jodie Bailey Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Coach 
Jodie Bailey Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 236

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3072

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 9810 Halls Ferry Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Coach Jodie 
                     Bailey Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 17, 2009

                       Reported without amendment
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3226 

To provide that appropriated funds may not be used to pay for any salaries 

or expenses of any task force, council, or similar office which is established by or at the direction of the President and headed by an individual 

who has been inappropriately appointed to such position (on other than 

an interim basis), without the advice and consent of the Senate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2009 

Mr. KINGSTON (for himself, Mr. CARTER, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BRADY of 

Texas, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. LATTA, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. POE

of Texas, Mr. PITTS, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. LINDER, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. 

CHAFFETZ, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Ms. FALLIN, Mr. SHADEGG, and Mr. LAMBORN) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide that appropriated funds may not be used to 

pay for any salaries or expenses of any task force, council, or similar office which is established by or at the 

direction of the President and headed by an individual 

who has been inappropriately appointed to such position 

(on other than an interim basis), without the advice 

and consent of the Senate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3226 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Czar Accountability 

3 and Reform (CZAR) Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Appropriated funds may not be 

6 used to pay for any salaries or expenses of any task force, 

7 council, or similar office— 

8 (1) which is established by or at the direction 

9 of the President; and 

10 (2) the head of which— 

11 (A) is appointed to such position (on other 

12 than an interim basis) without the advice and 

13 consent of the Senate; 

14 (B) is excepted from the competitive serv15 ice by reason of its confidential, policy-deter16 mining, the policy-making, or policy-advocating 

17 character; and 

18 (C) performs or delegates functions which 

19 (but for the establishment of such task force, 

20 council, or similar office) would be performed or 

21 delegated by an individual in a position to 

22 which the President appoints an individual by 

23 and with the advice and consent of the Senate. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3226 IH

1 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the 

2 term ‘‘competitive service’’ has the meaning given such 

3 term by section 2102 of title 5, United States Code. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-01-1999
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           4,620
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        50
<OTHER-SE>                      (4,670)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   7,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (7,982)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (7,982)
<EPS-BASIC>                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.00



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23
                                                                      ----------

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


                        We  consent  to   incorporation   by  reference  in  the
Registration Statement on Forms S-3 [File Number 033-81026] and S-8 [File Number
333-32293] of The Solomon-Page Group Ltd. and its subsidiary of our report dated
December 10, 1998,  relating to the  consolidated  balance  sheet of The Solomon
Page Group Ltd. and its  subsidiary  as of September  30, 1998,  and the related
consolidated statements of operations,  stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the two fiscal years in the period ended September 30, 1998 which report
appears  in  the  September  30,  1998  annual  report  on  Form  10-KSB  of The
Solomon-Page Group Ltd.







                                               MOORE STEPHENS, P. C.
                                               Certified Public Accountants.


Cranford, New Jersey
December 29, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  IMFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WORLDWIDE PETROMOLY, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE
30,  1998,  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       34375 
<SECURITIES>                                276579 
<RECEIVABLES>                               146527 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  45394 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            624866 
<PP&E>                                      160333 
<DEPRECIATION>                               38914 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              746285 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       333592 
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   7493228 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                (7196798)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                746285 
<SALES>                                     301150 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            301150 
<CGS>                                       214017 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               214017 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           3268692 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           15709 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (2193554)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (2193554)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (2193554)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.13)
        

</TABLE>
#### James H. McBRIDE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-6090.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 31, 2011.

Decided: April 6, 2011.

*296James H. McBride, Appellant pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James H. McBride appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to appoint McBride new counsel in a criminal case pending in state court. The district court abstained from deciding the case, pursuant to *Younger v. Harris,*401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971).* The *Younger*doctrine “permits federal courts to refrain from hearing cases that would interfere with a pending state criminal proceeding.” *Martin v. Stewart,*499 F.3d 360, 363 (4th Cir.2007). We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s decision to abstain under *Younger, Laurel Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Wilson,*519 F.3d 156, 161 (4th Cir.2008), and find no abuse of discretion here. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Although McBride did not file timely objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, he did pursue the alternate option suggested by the magistrate judge of filing an amended complaint. Thus, McBride’s failure to file objections did not result in a waiver of his right to appellate review, *cf. United States v. Midgette,*478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir.2007) (holding a party waives appellate review by failing to file timely and specific objections to a magistrate judge’s report).
#### John William DALTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-16069.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 21, 2011.

*645John William Dalton, Pekin, IL, pro se.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

John William Dalton, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), and subsequent judgment dismissing his action alleging constitutional violations arising from an investigation into his criminal activities and subsequent arrest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the determination that a complaint lacks arguable substance in law or fact, and review for an abuse of discretion the denial of leave to file a complaint in forma pauperis. *Tripati v. First Nat’l Bank & Trust,*821 F.2d 1368, 1369 (9th Cir.1987). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Dalton’s request to proceed in forma pauperis because it appears from the face of the complaint that the action is Uee/c-barred. *See Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 487, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994) (an action for damages is not cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 if “a judgment in favor of the plaintiff would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction or sentence ... unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the conviction or sentence has already been invalidated”); *see also Tripati,*821 F.2d at 1370 (“A district court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis at the outset if it appears from the face of the proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit.”).

Dalton’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

*646We instruct the clerk to file Dalton’s motion to recuse the district judge, and deny the motion as moot.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1067

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN L. SASSCER, Defendant - Appellant, and MABEL G. SASSCER, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-3026-Y) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 3, 2001Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John L. Sasscer, Appellant Pro Se. John A. Nolet, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Lynne Ann Battaglia, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:John L. Sasscer appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the United States with respect to his 1978-1981 and 1983-1989 federal income tax liability. Because the government’s action with respect to Sasscer’s 1976 and 1977 tax liability is still pending in the district court, we dismiss theappeal for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We deny Sasscer’s motion for summary judgment and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


                                   Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reality Wireless Networks, Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Steve
Careaga, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Steve Careaga
-----------------------------------
By: Steve Careaga
Its:  Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer/Acting Chief Financial Officer, Director
August 29, 2005

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reality Wireless Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Reality
Wireless Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.]