Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 198 / Monday, October 16, 2017 / Notices 48113 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2Commissioner Broadbent dissenting with 

respect to the antidumping duty order on subject 

imports from Romania. 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant 

to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), 

that there is no reasonable indication 

that an industry in the United States is 

materially injured or threatened with 

material injury, or that the 

establishment of an industry in the 

United States is materially retarded, by 

reason of imports of titanium sponge 

from Japan and Kazakhstan, provided 

for in subheading 8108.20.00 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States, that are alleged to be sold 

in the United States at less than fair 

value (‘‘LTFV’’) and to be subsidized by 

the government of Kazakhstan. 

Background 

On August 24, 2017, Titanium Metals 

Corporation, Exton, PA, filed a petition 

with the Commission and the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, alleging that 

an industry in the United States is 

materially injured and threatened with 

material injury by reason of LTFV 

imports of titanium sponge from Japan 

and Kazakhstan and subsidized imports 

of titanium sponge from Kazakhstan. 

Accordingly, effective August 24, 2017, 

the Commission, pursuant to sections 

703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1671b(a) and 1673b(a)), instituted 

countervailing duty investigation No. 

701–TA–587 and antidumping duty 

investigation Nos. 731–TA–1385–1386 

(Preliminary). 

Notice of the institution of the 

Commission’s investigations and of a 

public conference to be held in 

connection therewith was given by 

posting copies of the notice in the Office 

of the Secretary, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 

and by publishing the notice in the 

Federal Register of September 1, 2017 

(82 FR 41656). The conference was held 

in Washington, DC, on September 14, 

2017, and all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to sections 

703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1671b(a) and 1673b(a)). It completed 

and filed its determinations in these 

investigations on October 10, 2017. The 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 4736 (October 

2017), entitled Titanium Sponge from 

Japan and Kazakhstan: Investigation 

Nos. 701–TA–587 and 731–TA–1385– 

1386 (Preliminary). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 10, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–22266 Filed 10–13–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–847 and 849 

(Third Review)] 

Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, 

Line, and Pressure Pipe From Japan 

and Romania 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in these subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on carbon and 

alloy seamless standard, line, and 

pressure pipe from Japan and Romania 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time.2

Background 

The Commission, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), 

instituted these reviews on September 1, 

2016 (81 FR 60383) and determined on 

December 5, 2016 that it would conduct 

full reviews (81 FR 91199, December 16, 

2017). Notice of the scheduling of the 

Commission’s reviews and of a public 

hearing to be held in connection 

therewith was given by posting copies 

of the notice in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 

publishing the notice in the Federal 

Register on April 5, 2017 (82 FR 16621). 

The hearing was held in Washington, 

DC, on August 8, 2017, and all persons 

who requested the opportunity were 

permitted to appear in person or by 

counsel. 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 

completed and filed its determinations 

in these reviews on October 10, 2017. 

The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 4731 

(October 2017), entitled Carbon and 

Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and 

Pressure Pipe from Japan and Romania: 

Investigation Nos. 731–TA–847 and 849 

(Third Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 11, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–22318 Filed 10–13–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1074] 

Certain Industrial Automation Systems 

and Components Thereof Including 

Control Systems, Controllers, 

Visualization Hardware, Motion and 

Motor Control Systems, Networking 

Equipment, Safety Devices, and Power 

Supplies; Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

September 6, 2017, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of Rockwell Automation, Inc. of 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin. A supplement 

to the complaint was filed on September 

29, 2017. The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain industrial automation systems 

and components thereof including 

control systems, controllers, 

visualization hardware, motion and 

motor control systems, networking 

equipment, safety devices, and power 

supplies, by reason of infringement of 

U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 1,172,995 (‘‘the 

’995 trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. 

No. 696,401 (‘‘the ’401 trademark’’); U.S. 

Trademark Reg. No. 693,780 (‘‘the ’780 

trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 

1,172,994 (‘‘the ’994 trademark’’); U.S. 

Trademark Reg. No. 712,800 (‘‘the ’800 

trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 

712,836 (‘‘the ’836 trademark’’); U.S. 

Trademark Reg. No. 2,510,226 (‘‘the ’226 

trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 

2,671,196 (‘‘the ’196 trademark’’); U.S. 

Trademark Reg. No. 2,701,786 (‘‘the ’786 

trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 

2,412,742 (‘‘the ’742 trademark’’); U.S. 

Copyright Reg. No. TX0008389890 (‘‘the 

’890 copyright’’); U.S. Copyright Reg. 

No. TX0008389887 (‘‘the ’887 

copyright’’); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. 

TX0008390098 (‘‘the ’098 copyright)’’; 

U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008390094 

(‘‘the ’094 copyright’’); U.S. Copyright 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
48114 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 198 / Monday, October 16, 2017 / Notices 

Reg. No. TX0008390077 (‘‘the ’077 

copyright’’); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. 

TX0008390088 (‘‘the ’088 copyright’’); 

U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008390116 

(‘‘the ’116 copyright’’); U.S. Copyright 

Reg. No. TX0008390084 (‘‘the ’084 

copyright’’); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. 

TX0008390111 (‘‘the ’111 copyright’’); 

and U.S. Copyright Reg. No. 

TX0008390091 (‘‘the ’091 copyright’’). 

The complaint also alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. The Complaint further alleges a 

violation of Section 337 based on unfair 

methods of competition and unfair acts 

in the importation or sale of certain 

industrial automation systems and 

components thereof including control 

systems, controllers, visualization 

hardware, motion and motor control 

systems, networking equipment, safety 

devices, and power supplies, the threat 

or effect of which is to destroy or 

substantially injure an industry in the 

United States. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

general exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337 and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

October 6, 2017, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine: 

(a) Whether there is a violation of 

subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain industrial automation systems 

and components thereof including 

control systems, controllers, 

visualization hardware, motion and 

motor control systems, networking 

equipment, safety devices, and power 

supplies, by reason of infringement of 

the ’995 trademark; the ’401 trademark; 

the ’780 trademark; the ’994 trademark; 

the ’800 trademark; the ’836 trademark; 

the ’226 trademark; the ’196 trademark; 

the ’786 trademark; and the ’742 

trademark; and whether an industry in 

the United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(b) whether there is a violation of 

subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain industrial automation systems 

and components thereof including 

control systems, controllers, 

visualization hardware, motion and 

motor control systems, networking 

equipment, safety devices, and power 

supplies, by reason of infringement of 

the ’890 copyright; the ’887 copyright; 

the ’098 copyright; the ’094 copyright; 

the ’077 copyright; the ’088 copyright; 

the ’116 copyright; and the ’111 

copyright; and 

(c) whether there is a violation of 

subsection (a)(1)(A) in the importation 

or sale of certain industrial automation 

systems and components thereof 

including control systems, controllers, 

visualization hardware, motion and 

motor control systems, networking 

equipment, safety devices, and power 

supplies, by reason of unfair methods of 

competitions and unfair acts, the threat 

or effect of which is to destroy or 

substantially injure an industry in the 

United States; 

(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the 

presiding Administrative Law Judge 

shall take evidence or other information 

and hear arguments from the parties or 

other interested persons with respect to 

the public interest in this investigation, 

as appropriate, and provide the 

Commission with findings of fact and a 

recommended determination on this 

issue, which shall be limited to the 

statutory public interest factors set forth 

in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Rockwell 

Automation, Inc., 1201 South 2nd 

Street, Milwaukee, WI 53204–2410. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Can Electric Limited, No. 2 Danan Rd, 

Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 

Guangdong, 510115, China 

Capnil (HK) Company Limited, Unit 603 

6/F Koon Wah Mirrow, Factory 3 Ind 

Bldg 5–9 Ka Hing, Rd Kln Hk, Hong 

Kong 

Fractioni (Hongkong) Ltd., #327 Siping 

Road, Shanghai 200092, China 

Fujian Dahong Trade Co., Ltd, A15– 

2303 Taihongyu Pushang Road, 

Cangshan Fuzhou Fujian, Fujian 

350008, China 

GreySolution Limited d/b/a Fibica, Unit 

B601, 6/F Block A, Universal Ind. 

Ctr., 19–25 Shan Mei St Sha Tin, Fo 

Tan, Hong Kong 

Huang Wei Feng d/b/a A–O–M Industry, 

Room 201 No. 55 2 Qu, Tangshuiwei, 

Minzhi, Longhua, Boa’An, Shenzhen 

511700, China 

KBS Electronics Suzhou Co, Ltd., Block 

7&43, No. 328 Hengyong Road, 

Jiading district, Shanghai, China, 

201806 

PLC–VIP Shop d/b/a VIP Tech Limited, 

95 Fuk Wing Street, Cheung Sha Wan, 

Kowloon, Hong Kong 

Radwell International, Inc. d/b/a PLC 

Center, 1 Millennium Drive, 

Willingboro, NJ 08046 

Shanghai EuoSource Electronic Co., Ltd, 

Block 43, No. 328, Hengyong Road, 

Jiading District, Shanghai, China 

201806 

ShenZhen T-Tide Trading co., Ltd., 

Room A–60S, Block.lexi., Minle 

Industrial Park, Mei Ban Road, 

Longhua District, Shenzhen 518031, 

China 

SoBuy Commercial (HK) Co. Limited, 

Flat B G/F Yeung Yiu Chung (No. 6), 

Ind. Bldg. No. 19 Cheung Shun Street, 

Lai Chi Kok Kowloon, Hong Kong 

Suzhou Yi Micro Optical Co., Ltd., 

d/b/a Suzhou Yiwei Guangxue 

Youxiangongsi, d/b/a Easy Microoptics Co. LTD., Office Building 5F, 

91 Weixin Rd, Suzhou, SIP, Jiangsu, 

China, 215021 

Wenzhou Sparker Group Co. Ltd., 

d/b/a Sparker Instruments, Room 503, 

Oujiang Masion, Wenzhou Road, 

Wenzhou, 325000, China 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 198 / Monday, October 16, 2017 / Notices 48115 

Yaspro Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., 

Room 1808E, No. 488, Vaohua Road, 

Pudong New District, Shanghai, China 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 10, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–22267 Filed 10–13–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Mine Safety and Health Administration 

Petitions for Modification of 

Application of Existing Mandatory 

Safety Standards 

AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health 

Administration, Labor. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice is a summary of 

petitions for modification submitted to 

the Mine Safety and Health 

Administration (MSHA) by the parties 

listed below. 

DATES: All comments on the petitions 

must be received by MSHA’s Office of 

Standards, Regulations, and Variances 

on or before November 15, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit your 

comments, identified by ‘‘docket 

number’’ on the subject line, by any of 

the following methods: 

1. Electronic Mail: zzMSHAcomments@dol.gov. Include the docket 

number of the petition in the subject 

line of the message. 

2. Facsimile: 202–693–9441. 

3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery: 

MSHA, Office of Standards, 

Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th 

Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington, 

Virginia 22202–5452, Attention: Sheila 

McConnell, Director, Office of 

Standards, Regulations, and Variances. 

Persons delivering documents are 

required to check in at the receptionist’s 

desk in Suite 4E401. Individuals may 

inspect copies of the petition and 

comments during normal business 

hours at the address listed above. 

MSHA will consider only comments 

postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or 

proof of delivery from another delivery 

service such as UPS or Federal Express 

on or before the deadline for comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Barbara Barron, Office of Standards, 

Regulations, and Variances at 202–693– 

9447 (Voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov 

(Email), or 202–693–9441 (Facsimile). 

[These are not toll-free numbers.] 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and 

Health Act of 1977 and Title 30 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations Part 44 

govern the application, processing, and 

disposition of petitions for modification. 

I. Background 

Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine 

Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine 

Act) allows the mine operator or 

representative of miners to file a 

petition to modify the application of any 

mandatory safety standard to a coal or 

other mine if the Secretary of Labor 

(Secretary) determines that: 

1. An alternative method of achieving 

the result of such standard exists which 

will at all times guarantee no less than 

the same measure of protection afforded 

the miners of such mine by such 

standard; or 

2. That the application of such 

standard to such mine will result in a 

diminution of safety to the miners in 

such mine. 

In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR 

44.10 and 44.11 establish the 

requirements and procedures for filing 

petitions for modification. 

II. Petitions for Modification 

Docket Number: M–2017–017–C. 

Petitioner: Paramont Contura, LLC, 

Three Gateway Center, 401 Liberty 

Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

15222–1000. 

Mine: Deep Mine 44, MSHA I.D. No. 

44–07308, located in Dickenson County, 

Virginia. 

Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1700 

(Oil and gas wells). 

Modification Request: The petitioner 

requests a modification of the existing 

standard to permit an alternative 

method of compliance with respect to 

gas wells. The petitioner proposes to 

plug and mine through vertically drilled 

gas wells. The petitioner states that: 

The following alternative methods 

will be used when mining through 

vertically drilled degasification 

boreholes with horizontal laterals to 

permit mining through the boreholes. 

a. The petition will apply to all wells 

being mined through located within the 

mineable reserve at Paramount Coal 

Company’s Deep Mine 44. 

b. District Manager approval is 

required for the following proposed 

alternative methods: 

(1) A safety barrier of 300 feet in 

diameter (150 between any mined area 

and a well) will be maintained around 

all wells (defined herein to include all 

active, inactive, abandoned, shut-in, and 

previously plugged oil and gas wells, 

and including water injection wells) 

until approval to proceed with mining 

has been obtained from the District 

Manager (DM). Wells that were drilled 

into potential oil or gas producing 

formations that did not produce 

commercial quantities of either gas or 

oil (wildcat wells or dry holes) are also 

defined as oil or gas wells. 

(2) Prior to mining within the safety 

barrier around any well that is intended 

to be mined through, the mine operator 

will provide the DM a sworn affidavit or 

declaration executed by a company 

official stating that all mandatory 

procedures for cleaning out, preparing, 

and plugging each gas or oil well have 

been completed as described by the 

terms and conditions of this petition. 

The affidavit or declaration must be 

accompanied by all logs described 

below and any other records described 

in those subparagraphs which the DM 

may request. The DM will review the 

affidavit or declaration, the logs, and 

other records that have been requested, 

and may inspect the well. The DM will 

determine if the operator has complied 

with the procedures for cleaning, 

preparing, and plugging each well as 

described by the terms and conditions 

of this petition. If the DM determines 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES