T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T H A F I D T A H R A O U I , a n in d iv idu a l, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. F R A N K L I N B R O W N ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 35291 D. C . No . 3 : 1 1 - c v - 0 5 9 0 1 - B HS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on B e nj a m i n H . S e tt l e , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t14, 2013 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , G R A B E R , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H a f i d T a hr a oui appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng tha tde f e nda nt s vi ol a t e d hi s F i r s t , F ourth, Fi f th , a n dFo u rt e e n th A me n d me n tr i g h t s . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o ad is tr ic t c o u rt’s d is m is s a l f o rf a ilu r e to s ta te ac la im 

# FI LED AU G 21 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 35291 2 u n d e rF e d . R . C iv . P . 1 2 ( b ) ( 6 ) . R o m a n o v . B ib le , 16 9 F . 3d 11 82 , 11 85 (9th C i r. 1 9 9 9 ) . W e m a ya f

f irm o n a n yg r o u n ds u p p o rte db yth e r e c o r d . L am bert v. B lo d g e tt , 3 9 3 F. 3 d9 4 3 , 9 6 5 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d T a hr a oui ’ s F i r s tA m e ndm e nt r e ta lia tio n c la im b e c au s e T a h r a o u i f a ile dto a lle g e f

a c ts s h o w in g th a t d e f

e n d a n ts a c te dw ith th e in te n t o f

c h illin g T a h r a o u i’s p r o te c te dc o n d u c t. Se e Sko o gv . C o u n ty of C lac kam as , 469 F . 3d 1221, 1232 ( 9th C i r . 2006) ( i n aF i r s tA m e ndm e nt r e t a l i a t i on c l a i m , pl a i nt i f f m us tde m ons tr a t e tha tde f e nda nt ’ s “ de s i r e t o c aus e the chi l l i ng ef

fe ctw as a but -f

or cause of the defendant ’ s a ct i on ”) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dT a h r a o u i’s F o u rth A m e n d m e n t c la im b e c au s e T a h r a o u i w a s n o t s e iz e df o rp u rp o s e s o f

th e F o u rth A m e n d m e n t. See B r e n d lin v . Ca lifo rn ia , 55 1 U . S . 24 9, 25 4 (20 07 ) ( “ A po l i ce offi ce r m aym ake a s e i z ur e byas how of

author i tya nd w i thoutthe us e of phy s i c a l f

or c e , butthe r e i s no se i zure w i tho utac tual subm i ss i on ; otherw i se there i s a tm ostan att em pt ed se i zure , so far a s the F ou rth A m endm enti s c on ce rned. ”) . D i sm i ssal o f T ah rao u i ’ s su b st an t i v e d u e p ro cess cl ai m w as p ro p er b ecau se T a h r a o u i f

a ile dto a lle g e f

a c ts s h o w in g th a t d e f

e n d a n ts a c te dw ith s u c h d e lib e r a te i nd i ff er ence t o h i s r i gh t s thatthei r a ct i on s “ shock the consci ence . ” See T am as v. D ep ’t o f So c. & H

ea l th Servs. , 630 F . 3d 833, 844 ( 9th C i r . 2010) ( “ T o vi ol a t e due12- 35291 3 p r o c e s s , s ta te o f

f ic ia ls m u s t a c t w ith s u c h d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e to th e lib e rty i nt er es tthatthei r a ct i on s ‘ shock the consci ence . ’ ” ( ci t at i on om i tt ed)) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng T a hr a oui ’ s m ot i on f o rr e c o n s id e r a tio n , in c lu d in g h is r e q u e s t to a m e n dh is c o m p la in t to in c lu d e f a c ts and a cl ai m thathe “ un i nt ent i on al l y f orgo t ” t o i ncl ud e i n h i s F i rs tA m ended C o m p la in t. Se e SE C . v . P lat f orm s W i r e les s I nt ’ l C or p. , 6 1 7 F .3 d1 0 7 2 , 1 1 0 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ( s e ttin g f

o rth s ta n d a r do f

r e v ie w ) ; see a l

so W . D . W a s h. R . 7( h) ( 1) (m ot i on s f

or re consi dera t i on w i l l be “ ordi nari l y den[i ed] ” i n the abse nce of a sh o w i n g o f “ n ew fact s . . . w h i ch co u l dn o th av e b een b ro u g h tt o [th e co u rt ’ s] a tte n tio n e a r lie rw ith r e a s o n ab le d ilig e n c e ” ) . AF F I RME D.