alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-99.j

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of AMCON Distributing Company:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the related
consolidated statements of income and shareholders' equity and comprehensive
income and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of AMCON Distributing Company and its
subsidiaries as of September 30, 2000 and the consolidated results of their
operations and their consolidated cash flows for each of the two years in
the period ended September 30, 2000, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.  We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America,
which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
changed its method of accounting for inventory in fiscal 1999.



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Omaha, Nebraska
November 22, 2000, except for paragraph 1
 of Note 1 and paragraph 1 of Note 2,
 for which the date is March 23, 2001
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3236 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to complete at least 700 

miles of reinforced fencing along the Southwest border by December 

31, 2010, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2009 

Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to complete 

at least 700 miles of reinforced fencing along the Southwest border by December 31, 2010, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Complete the Fence 

5 Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3236 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF REINFORCED FENCING ALONG 

2 SOUTHWEST BORDER. 

3 Section 102(b)(1) of the Illegal Immigration Reform 

4 and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1103 

5 note) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (A), by adding at the end 

7 the following new sentence: ‘‘Fencing that does not 

8 effectively restrain pedestrian traffic (such as vehicle 

9 barriers and virtual fencing) may not be used to 

10 meet the 700-mile fence requirement under this sub11 paragraph.’’; 

12 (2) in subparagraph (B)— 

13 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

14 end; 

15 (B) in clause (ii), by striking the period at 

16 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

17 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

18 clause: 

19 ‘‘(iii) not later than December 31, 

20 2010, complete the construction of all the 

21 reinforced fencing and the installation of 

22 the related equipment described in sub23 paragraph (A).’’; and 

24 (3) in subparagraph (C), by adding at the end 

25 the following: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3236 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) FUNDING NOT CONTINGENT ON

2 CONSULTATION.—Amounts appropriated to 

3 carry out this paragraph may not be im4 pounded or otherwise withheld for failure 

5 to fully comply with the consultation re6 quirement under clause (i).’’. 

7 SEC. 3. PROGRESS REPORT. 

8 Not later than December 31, 2009, the Secretary of 

9 Homeland Security shall submit a report to Congress that 

10 describes— 

11 (1) the progress made in completing the rein12 forced fencing required under section 102(b)(1) of 

13 the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Re14 sponsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1103 note), as 

15 amended by this Act; and 

16 (2) the plans for completing such fencing before 

17 December 31, 2010. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 3, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137594 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. _________________________________________ Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

In re CHRISTOPHER SEGAR, THOMAS 

SEGAR, and ERIC SEGAR, Minors. 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 137594 

 COA: 284817 

Clare CC Family Division:

07-000221-NA 

JOSEPH SEGAR,

Respondent-Appellant, 

and 

TINA SEGAR, 

Respondent. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1125 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 3, 2008 

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WORLDWIDE PETROMOLY, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE
30, 1997,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

        
<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         864,555
<SECURITIES>                                   946,828
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    128,651
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,326,817
<PP&E>                                         122,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,639,211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          415,109 
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,914,773
<OTHER-SE>                                  (5,003,244)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,639,211
<SALES>                                        216,887
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216,887
<CGS>                                          191,500  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,475,836
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,211  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,287,123)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,287,123)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,287,123)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.27)

        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesus Maria LUGO-ROMAN, also known as Jesus Marie Lugo, also known as Jesus Lugo-Roman, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50697

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 14, 2011.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*317Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jesus Maria Lugo-Roman appeals the 60-month sentence imposed in connection with his guilty plea conviction for attempted illegal reentry. He argues that his sentence is unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to meet the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2). Specifically, Lugo-Roman contends that the illegal reentry guideline overemphasized his criminal history and that the guidelines range did not adequately reflect his motive for reentering the country (seeing his mother after she suffered a stroke and was believed to be dying), his cultural assimilation, or that this was his first reentry offense.

Lugo-Roman’s sentence is within the properly calculated guidelines range and is presumptively reasonable. *See United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006); *see also United States v. Duarte,*569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir.) (rejecting the argument that a guidelines illegal reentry sentence was unreasonable because the guideline is not empirically based and emphasizes a defendant’s criminal history), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 378, 175 L.Ed.2d 231 (2009). As Lugo-Roman concedes, his argument that the presumption should not apply is foreclosed. *See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago,*564 F.3d 357, 367 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 192, 175 L.Ed.2d 120 (2009). Lugo-Roman has not rebutted the presumption that his within-guidelines sentence is reasonable. *See United States v. Gomez-Herrera,*523 F.3d 554, 565-66 (5th Cir.2008); *United States v. Rodriguez,*523 F.3d 519, 526 (5th Cir. 2008). The district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Lugo-Roman to 60 months of imprisonment. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that diis opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3215 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the National 

Park Service Superintendent of the Everglades National Park, to allow 

individuals to hunt and kill Burmese pythons within the boundaries 

of that Park. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2009 

Mr. ROONEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, acting through 

the National Park Service Superintendent of the Everglades National Park, to allow individuals to hunt and 

kill Burmese pythons within the boundaries of that Park. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO HUNT AND KILL BURMESE 

4 PYTHONS IN EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK. 

5 The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Na6 tional Park Service Superintendent of the Everglades Na7 tional Park, may authorize individuals to hunt and kill 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3215 IH

1 Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivittatus) within the 

2 boundaries of that Park. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      32**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
      of
      Cascade Financial Corporation (the “Registrant”). This Certification is made
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification
      accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the annual
      period ended December 31, 2005.





We
      certify that such Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that the information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of
      the
      Registrant.





Date:
      March 13, 2006








/s/
      Carol K. Nelson


Carol
      K.
      Nelson, President and Chief Executive Officer








/s/
      Lars H.
      Johnson


Lars
      H.
      Johnson, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report of Quick-Med Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").





In connection with the  Report, I, J. Ladd Greeno, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the date and for the periods indicated.











Dated:  February 14, 2011                                                                   /s/  J. Ladd Greeno____________________________


J. Ladd Greeno


Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Emergency Filtration Products, Inc. (the ACompany@) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the AReport@), I, Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Steve M. Hanni Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer  Date: November 14, 2006  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-7256

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BOBBIE RAY EDWARDS, a/k/a Tank,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-10; 

4:22-cv-00057-AWA)

Submitted: February 22, 2024 Decided: February 27, 2024

Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobbie Ray Edwards, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7256 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/27/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Bobbie Ray Edwards seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motion as successive and unauthorized and denying his motion for an audio 

recording. The denial of a § 2255 motion is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Edwards has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss this part of the appeal. 

Turning to the rest of the appeal, for which Edwards does not need a certificate of 

appealability, see Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 183 (2009), we discern no reversible 

error in the district court’s decision to deny Edwards’ motion for an audio recording. We 

therefore affirm this part of the court’s order. United States v. Edwards, No. 4:11-cr00055-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. Nov. 8, 2023).

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7256 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/27/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED IN PART,

AFFIRMED IN PART

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7256 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/27/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the
Managing Owner), of Diversified Futures Trust I (the Fund), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                                                               
|Maureen D. Howley Chief Financial Officer &
Senior Vice President September 16, 2005
[Letterhead]

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
2400 First Indiana Plaza
135 North Pennsylvania Street
Indianapolis, IN  46204-2452




The Board of Directors
Union Acceptance Corporation:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statement  (No.
333-09717)  on Form S-8 of Union  Acceptance  Corporation  of our  report  dated
August  27,  1998,  relating  to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of the Union
Acceptance  Corporation  and  Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1998 and 1997, and the
related  consolidated  statements of earnings (loss) and comprehensive  earnings
(loss)  shareholders'  equity  and cash flows for each of the years in the three
year  period  ended June 30,  1998,  which  report  appears in the June 30, 1998
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Union Acceptance Corporation.



/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
September 28, 1998
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry M. Copeland, President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/  Terry M. CopelandTerry M. Copeland, President and CEO

May 10, 2010
**Exhibit 8.1**

 

**List of Main Subsidiaries**

 
| **Subsidiaries**                                     | ** ** | **Jurisdiction** | ** ** | **Usual Name**      |
|------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------|------------|--------------------------|
| Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A.    |       | Chile            |       | San Isidro               |
| Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A. |       | Chile            |       | Celta                    |
| Empresa de Ingeniería Ingendesa S.A.            |       | Chile            |       | Ingendesa                |
| Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A.                   |       | Chile            |       | Pangue                   |
| Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.                |       | Chile            |       | Pehuenche                |
| Endesa Eco S.A.                                 |       | Chile            |       | Endesa Eco          |
| Sociedad Concesionaria Túnel El Melón S.A. |       | Chile            |       | Túnel El Melón |
| Endesa Costanera S.A.                                |       | Argentina        |       | Endesa Costanera         |
| Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.              |       | Argentina        |       | El Chocón           |
| Emgesa   S.A. E.S.P.                                 |       | Colombia         |       | Emgesa                   |
| Edegel S.A.A.                                        |       | Perú        |       | Edegel                   |

 

1

----