alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT              32.2**

**CERTIFICATE              OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT              TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.              1350)**

|  | 1. | The                        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                        or 15(d)                        of                        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                        and |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all                        material                        respects,                        the financial condition and results of operations of the                        Company. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                            |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/  Timothy                        Brink                                                                             |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                 |   |   |        |
| Timothy                          BrinkChief                          Financial OfficerApril                            16, 2007 |   |   |   |

----
#### R. Wayne JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-50262

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 8, 2011.

R. Wayne Johnson, Amarillo, TX, pro se.

Kelly Michelle Croxton, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff-Appellant R. Wayne Johnson, Texas prisoner # 282756, appeals the district court’s denial of his motions for a preliminary injunction and for class-action certification. These motions were filed in conjunction with a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application, in which Johnson challenged the validity of Texas’s habeas corpus law, the alleged use of disciplinary infractions to deny inmates release on mandatory supervision, and the charging of criminal acts as disciplinary infractions. Johnson’s application also stated that he was seeking an injunction ordering Texas courts and officials to adhere to Supreme Court precedent, declaring Texas’s habeas corpus law void, and ordering Texas officials to discontinue prosecuting criminal acts as disciplinary infractions in the absence of full constitutional safeguards at disciplinary hearings.

On appeal, Johnson first states that he is seeking a certificate of appealability (COA). However, he is not required to obtain a COA to appeal the denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction because he is not challenging “the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). Accordingly, his request for a COA is denied as unnecessary.

Interlocutory orders denying preliminary injunctions are immediately appeal-able as an exception to the final-judgment rule. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1); *Lake-*
      *432
      *dreams v. Taylor,*932 F.2d 1103, 1107 (5th Cir.1991). However, Johnson has not met the criteria for warranting a preliminary injunction. *See Byrum v. Landreth,*566 F.3d 442, 445 (5th Cir.2009). The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. *See Anderson v. Jackson,*556 F.3d 351, 355 (5th Cir.2009). Therefore, we affirm the district court’s order denying Johnson’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) provides that a party may appeal the denial of class-action certification only “if a petition for permission to appeal is filed with the circuit clerk within 14 days after the order is entered.” Johnson’s notice of appeal was filed well more than 14 days after the denial of his motion for certification. Therefore, we dismiss his petition for permission to appeal the denial of his motion for class certification as untimely filed.

MOTION DENIED; AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
---

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
  REQUIRED BY RULE
13A - 14(A) OR RULE 15D - 14(A)

I, Bob Bates, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Inova
Technology Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: March 22, 2011 | /s/
      Bob Bates    
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Chief Financial Officer

---
[No. 66057-8-I.

Division One.

October 8, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Clinton Robinson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 09-1-06950-2, Laura Gene Middaugh, J., entered September 3, 2010. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Spearman, A.C.J.,

concurred in by Cox and Ellington, JJ.
Order entered November 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00143-CR

TORRY GOODSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-62599-K

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s November 16, 2015 second motion for extension of 

time to file appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file the brief within SEVEN (7) DAYS from the date of this 

order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robin Drouin, Appellant.

[987 NYS2d 590]

Motion for reargument denied.

Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RG America, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), John
E. Rea, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that
to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ John E. Rea
---------------
John E. Rea
Principal Executive Officer
November 15, 2004
#### In re Kenneth L. POTTEBAUM, Svetlana I. Kovinskaya, and John D. Stricklin.

No. 2008-1223.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 24, 2008.

ON MOTION

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the appellants’ unopposed motion to withdraw their appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GUILLERMO ARTURO SALAS

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 22

- 00 154

- C R

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 202 00 C0 7457 )

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was due to be f i led on September 17, 2022 . The County Clerk advised

the Court on September 20 , 202 2 and October 4, 2022 that no designation has been received.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing to determine whether

Appellant wishes to continue the appeal, whether Appellant has been deprived of a clerk’s record,

and whether Appe llant is entitled to appointment of new counsel or has been deprived of effective

assistance of counsel. The trial court shall forward its findings to the County Clerk of El Paso

County, Texas, on or before October 26, 2022 . The County Clerk shall prepare and forward a

supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings and forward the same to this Court

on or before November 5 , 202 2

. Further, the trial court’s reporter shall prepare, certify, and file

the record of the trial court proceedin gs with this Court on or before November 5 , 202 2

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6 th day of October , 20 2 2

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.1


Featherlite, Inc.
P.O Box 320
Highway 63 & 9
Cresco, Iowa 52136

April 15, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Letter to Commission Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Arthur
Andersen LLP ("Andersen") has represented to us, by letter dated April 15, 2002,
that its audit of the financial statements of Featherlite, Inc., for the period
ended December 31, 2001, was subject to Andersen's quality control system for
the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that
the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that
there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit,
availability of national office consultation and availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Very truly yours,

Featherlite, Inc.

/s/ Conrad D. Clement

Conrad D. Clement
President and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 Tuesday, October 24, 2017, 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

# PLACE:

 Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD.

# STATUS:

 Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

# MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

*Decisional Matter:*                         Fiscal Year 2018 Operating Plan.                    

                        A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at                         *https://www.cpsc.gov/​live*.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Rockelle Hammond, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: October 13, 2017.

Alberta E. Mills, 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-22661 Filed 10-16-17; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
Exhibit 24.1

                        POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose
signature appears below hereby severally constitutes and appoints
Wayne N. Snyder and Doug Brown, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB of Alliance Farms Cooperative Association for the
fiscal year ended August 31, 1998, together with any and all
amendments thereto and all documents relating therewith, and to
file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing necessary or advisable to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his substitute or substitutes,
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


/s/ Wayne N. Snyder                          November 23, 1998
Wayne N. Snyder
Chairman of the Board, President
and Director


/s/ Doug Brown                               November 4, 1998
Doug Brown
Treasurer, Secretary and Director


/s/ Merl Daniel                              November 17, 1998
Merl Daniel
Director


/s/ Loren Keppy                              November 5, 1998
Loren Keppy
Director


/s/ Larry Welsh                              November 9, 1998
Larry Welsh
Director
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2714 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2714

   To ensure pay parity for Federal employees serving at Joint Base 
                         McGuire/Dix/Lakehurst.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2009

  Mr. Adler of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. 
  Andrews, Mr. LoBiondo, and Mr. Holt) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To ensure pay parity for Federal employees serving at Joint Base 
                         McGuire/Dix/Lakehurst.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAY PARITY FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES SERVING AT JOINT BASE 
              MCGUIRE/DIX/LAKEHURST.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of any determination of pay for an 
employee serving at Joint Base McGuire/Dix/Lakehurst, the pay schedules 
and rates to be used shall be the same as if such employee were serving 
in the pay locality, wage area, or other area or locality (whichever 
would apply to determine pay for the employee involved) that includes 
Ocean County, New Jersey.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section--
            (1) the term ``employee'' means an employee (as defined by 
        section 2105 of title 5, United States Code)--
                    (A) whose pay is determined under subchapter III or 
                IV of chapter 53 of such title; or
                    (B) who is paid from nonappropriated funds of any 
                instrumentality of the United States;
            (2) the term ``pay locality'' refers to a pay locality 
        under section 5302 of such title; and
            (3) the term ``wage area'' refers to a wage area under 
        section 5343 of such title.
    (c) Regulations.--The Office of Personnel Management may prescribe 
any regulations necessary to carry out this Act.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall apply with respect to pay for service performed in 
any pay period beginning on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act or October 1, 2009, whichever is later.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23



                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Cascade Financial Corporation and subsidiaries:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Forms S-8 (No. 33-94456, No. 333-32272 and No. 333-97929) of Cascade
Financial Corporation of our report dated February 28, 2003 relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Cascade Financial Corporation and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and
cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2002, for the six month period ended
December 31, 2001 and for each of the years in the two-year period ended June
30, 2001, which report is incorporated by reference into Cascade Financial
Corporation's 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K from Cascade Financial
Corporation's 2002 Annual Report to Stockholders.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 24, 2003
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OBED OMAR ESCOBAR

- VASQUEZ,

Petitioner,

v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 16

- 70658 Agency No. A206

- 735

- 980

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 2 6 , 2017 **
Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Obed Omar Escobar

- Vasquez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 30 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 70658

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial
evidence the agency’s factual findings

. Vitug v. Holder , 723 F .3d 1056 , 1062 (9th Cir. 2013). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
We lack jurisdi ction to consider Escobar

- Vasquez’s contentions that his claims should have been analyzed under a child

- specific definition of persecution, that victims of child abuse may constitute a particular social group, and his arguments as to his experi ences of childhood abuse, b ecause he failed to raise them
before the agency
. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th Cir. 2004).
The BIA did not err by affirming , without opinion, the IJ’s decision. See Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft , 350 F.3d 845 , 850

- 52 (9th Cir. 2003).
Substantial evidence supports the agency ’s determination Escobar

- Vasquez
failed to estab lish a nexus between the past harm he experienced in Guatemala and a protected ground

. See Pagayon v. Holder , 675 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2 011) (“A personal dispute is not, standing alone, tantamount to persecution based on” a protected ground). Escobar

- Velasquez ’s contention that he was entitled to a presumption of future persecution therefore fails

. See El Himri v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 932, 936 (9th Cir. 2004) (concluding that a petitioner who did not establish past persecution was therefore not entitled to a presumption of future persecution)

. Escobar

- Velasquez does not otherwise challenge the agency’s determination that
he failed to estab lish a likelihood of future persecution. Thus, his withholding of3 16

- 70658

removal claim fails. Finally, s ubstantial evidence supports the ag ency’s denial of Escobar

Vasquez ’s CAT claim because he failed to establish it is more likely than not he
would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if
returned to Guatemala

. See Silaya v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part
.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  
 1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), as amended; and
 2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Joseph A. GarcíaName:
    
    Joseph A. GarcíaTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, 
Senior
Executive Vice President and Secretary