alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

We haveissued our reports dated March 15, 2006, accompanying the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule and management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in theAnnual Report of Polymer Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of PolymerGroup, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-131156, effective January 20,2006, File No. 333-121252, effective December 14, 2004 and FileNo. 333-121254, effective December 14, 2004).
| /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |
| Columbia, South Carolina |   |
| March 15, 2006      |   |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 9, 2019

No. 04-19-00206-CR

Joel ALEJANDREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-CR-101

Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After we granted court reporter Dora Canizales’s first motion for extension of time to file 

the reporter’s record, we set the record due on September 3, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. R. 35.3(c). 

On the extended due date, the court reporter filed a second request for an extension of time to file 

the record until October 3, 2019. 

The reporter’s request is GRANTED. The reporter’s record must be filed with this court 

by October 3, 2019. See id.

If the court reporter is unable to file the completed record by October 3, 2019, any further 

request for additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written status 

report. 

The report must describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and 

remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of 

pages edited, proofread, and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks). 

The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any 

problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond 

the requested date. 

The preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached. 
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Emergency Filtration
Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Steve M. Hanni
Steve M. Hanni
Principal Financial Officer
Emergency Filtration Products, Inc.
October 21, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors Meeting.

# TIME AND DATE:

The meeting will be held on October 26, 2017, from 12:00 Noon to 3:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

# PLACE:

This meeting will be open to the public via conference call. Any interested person may call 1-877-422-1931, passcode 2855443940, to listen and participate in this meeting.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and, to that end, may consider matters properly before the Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.

 Issued on: October 12, 2017.

Larry W. Minor, 

Associate Administrator, Office of Policy, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.

[FR Doc. 2017-22580 Filed 10-13-17; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
Opinion issued April 1 8 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 18
- 00498
- CR

——————————— LOSTON MOORE, JR. , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 208th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1572146

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellan t Loston Moore , Jr. filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2 (a). See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.2(a). The State has not opposed this motion. We have not issued a decision in the appeal

.2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Kelly, and Hightower. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2 (b).
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D 20 22

- 1007

_____________________________

K RYSTAL H INSON
,

Appellant,

v.

A GENCY F OR H EALTH C ARE A DMINISTRATION
,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Public Employee Relations Commission. Donna Poole, Chair.

January 23, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

.

O STERHAUS
, C.J., and B.L. T HOMAS and M.K. T HOMAS
, JJ.,

concur

.

_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331

.

_____________________________2 Donald E. Pinaud , Jr. of All Florida Justice, LLC a/k/a Law Office of Don Pinaud, Jacksonville , for Appellant.

Tracy Cooper George, Chief Appellate Counsel, and Andrew T. Sheeran, General Counsel, Agency for Health Care Administration, Tallahassee , for Appellee.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

         The following is a list of the active subsidiaries of the Company as of
March 30, 1998, indicating the jurisdiction of incorporation of each and the
names under which such subsidiaries conduct business. In the case of each
subsidiary which is indented, its immediate parent owns beneficially all of the
voting securities.

            NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                  JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
            ------------------                  -----------------------------

        BGLS Inc.                                            Delaware
        Liggett Group Inc.                                   Delaware
        Brooke (Overseas) Ltd.                               Delaware
        New Valley Holdings, Inc.                            Delaware

         Not included above are other subsidiaries which, if considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary,
as such term is defined by Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3250 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1210 West Main Street in Riverhead, New York, as the ‘‘Private First 

Class Garfield M. Langhorn Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2009 

Mr. BISHOP of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1210 West Main Street in Riverhead, New 

York, as the ‘‘Private First Class Garfield M. Langhorn 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS GARFIELD M. 

4 LANGHORN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1210 West Main Street in 

7 Riverhead, New York, shall be known and designated as 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3250 IH

1 the ‘‘Private First Class Garfield M. Langhorn Post Office 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Private First Class 

7 Garfield M. Langhorn Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Satbir Singh RANDHAWA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-72058.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 22, 2011.

Pardeep S. Grewal, Esquire, Law Offices of Pardeep S. Grewal, Castro Valley, CA, for Petitioner.

*702Cindy S. Ferrier, Senior Litigation Counsel, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Satbir Singh Randhawa, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Randhawa’s motion to reopen where he failed to establish that ineffective assistance of counsel may have affected the outcome of his case. *See id.*at 793-94 (to demonstrate prejudice, alien must establish that counsel’s performance may have affected the outcome of proceedings).

Randhawa’s remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5





<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         81,211
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,669
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,920
<PP&E>                                         53,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 225,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          186,325
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   225,616
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               978,349
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (910,293)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (910,293)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (910,293)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    1.569
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.035



</TABLE>
#### Martin Gray, as Administrator of the Estate of Diana Gray, Deceased, Appellant, v South Nassau Communities Hospital, Appellant, et al., Defendant, and Norma Wenger, Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 27]

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff and the defendant South Nassau Communities Hospital separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated March 7, 1997, which granted the motion of the defendant Norma Wenger for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendant South Nassau Communities Hospital is dismissed *(see, Nunez v Travelers Ins. Co.,*139 AD2d 712; *Hauser v North Rockland Cent. School Dist. No. 1,*166 AD2d 553); and it is further,

Ordered that, on the appeal of the plaintiff, the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the defendant Norma Wenger; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs payable by the defendant Norma Wenger.

A proponent of a motion for summary judgment must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, proffering sufficient evidence to demonstrate an absence of any material issues of fact *(see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320; *Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851). Failure to proffer such evidence warrants denial of the motion regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers *(see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., supra).*Here, although the defendant Wenger proffered the affidavit of a medical expert, the affidavit was based, in part, on disputed or apparently incorrect facts and, therefore, failed to establish the absence of material issues of fact *(see, Muscatello v City of New York,*215 AD2d 463). Accordingly, the defendant Wenger’s motion for summary judgment should have been denied. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Jóy, JJ., concur.
[No. 41791-0-II.

Division Two.

October 24, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Eugene Tremble III, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 10-1-02484-2, James R. Orlando, J., entered February 4, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Penoyar, J.,

concurred in by Johanson, A.C.J., and QuinnBrintnall, J.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-87715, No. 333-39129, No. 333-59859, No. 33-
85272, No. 33-94972, 333-41954 and 333-54010) of Mattson Technology, Inc of
our report dated February 9, 1999 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
_____________________________________
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
March 29, 2001
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In re: Edward B. Lyon, Jr.

No. 06-12-00110-CV

Appeal from the 5th District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 10C1523-005). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Edward B. Lyon, Jr., has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 20, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Intermost
Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation (the “Company”) with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-QA for the three months
ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), the undersigned, Thomas Lee, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, that to the best of his
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





This
certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be
deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any
purpose whatsoever.





Date:  December
1, 2008








By:
            /s/ Thomas LeeThomas
      Lee,
              Chief
      Financial Officer





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Louis Pardo dit Pardau, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Poseidis, Inc.

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the registrant and have:


     A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
     B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "evaluation date"); and
     C) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on our  evaluation as of the
evaluation date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     A) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     B) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

Date:  July 6, 2005



By:  /s/ Louis Pardo dit Pardau
       Louis Pardo dit Pardau
       Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
       Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
[No. 67717-9-I.

Division One.

November 13, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jonathan Wayne Grantham, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 10-1-01602-8, George N. Bowden, J., entered August 23, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Leach, C.J.,

concurred in by Dwyer and Spearman, JJ.