alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| (1)    | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended      December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

| Dated:  March 1, 2010 | /s/ Thomas B.      Specketer       |   |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                            | Thomas      B. Specketer           |   |
|                            | Vice      President and Controller |   |
|                            | (principal      financial officer) |   |

----

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              450
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,450)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,441
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,441)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,441)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONSOLIDATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT FOUND OF PAGES 23 AND 24 OF THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-K FOR THIS YEAR AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          21,547
<SECURITIES>                                    16,620
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,154
<PP&E>                                           9,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,374
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,580
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,489
<SALES>                                         73,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,260
<CGS>                                           33,231
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,407
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,649
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,184
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2944 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2944

  To withdraw certain Federal lands and interests located in Pima and 
Santa Cruz counties, Arizona, from the mining and mineral leasing laws 
             of the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2009

 Mr. Grijalva (for himself and Ms. Giffords) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To withdraw certain Federal lands and interests located in Pima and 
Santa Cruz counties, Arizona, from the mining and mineral leasing laws 
             of the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Southern Arizona Public Lands 
Protection Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF FEDERAL LANDS AND INTERESTS LOCATED IN PIMA AND 
              SANTA CRUZ COUNTIES, ARIZONA.

    Subject to valid existing rights, after the date of enactment of 
this Act--
            (1) all federally owned interests in National Forest lands 
        in Santa Cruz County and Pima County, Arizona, are withdrawn 
        from--
                    (A) all forms of entry, appropriation, and disposal 
                under the public land laws;
                    (B) location, entry, and patent under the mining 
                laws; and
                    (C) operation of the mineral leasing and geothermal 
                leasing laws, and the mineral materials laws;
            (2) all federally owned subsurface interests under the 
        administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management in 
        lands in Pima County, Arizona, with respect to which the 
        surface interests are owned by such county, including in such 
        lands located in Davidson Canyon, are withdrawn from--
                    (A) all forms of entry, appropriation and disposal 
                under the public land laws;
                    (B) location, entry, and patent under the mining 
                laws; and
                    (C) operation of the mineral leasing and geothermal 
                leasing laws, and the mineral materials laws; and
            (3) all federally owned interests in Bureau of Land 
        Management lands in Pima County, Arizona, are withdrawn from 
        entry, location, or patent under the general mining laws.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OBED OMAR ESCOBAR-VASQUEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-70658 

Agency No. A206-735-980 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 26, 2017**

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. 

Obed Omar Escobar-Vasquez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily 

affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for 

withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-70658 

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial 

evidence the agency’s factual findings. Vitug v. Holder, 723 F.3d 1056, 1062 (9th 

Cir. 2013). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Escobar-Vasquez’s contentions that his 

claims should have been analyzed under a child-specific definition of persecution, 

that victims of child abuse may constitute a particular social group, and his 

arguments as to his experiences of childhood abuse, because he failed to raise them 

before the agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004).

The BIA did not err by affirming, without opinion, the IJ’s decision. See 

Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 850-52 (9th Cir. 2003).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination Escobar-Vasquez

failed to establish a nexus between the past harm he experienced in Guatemala and 

a protected ground. See Pagayon v. Holder, 675 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2011) 

(“A personal dispute is not, standing alone, tantamount to persecution based on” a 

protected ground). Escobar-Velasquez’s contention that he was entitled to a 

presumption of future persecution therefore fails. See El Himri v. Ashcroft, 378 

F.3d 932, 936 (9th Cir. 2004) (concluding that a petitioner who did not establish 

past persecution was therefore not entitled to a presumption of future persecution). 

Escobar-Velasquez does not otherwise challenge the agency’s determination that 

he failed to establish a likelihood of future persecution. Thus, his withholding of 
3 16-70658 

removal claim fails.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of EscobarVasquez’s CAT claim because he failed to establish it is more likely than not he 

would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if 

returned to Guatemala. See Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 

2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 The
undersigned, Steve Khan, Chief Executive Officer and Robert Hemmerling, Chief
Financial Officer, of Investment Associates Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              the
      quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Investment Associates Inc. for the
      period ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
 
 2.
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Investment
      Associates Inc.
 
 
 
 
 Dated:
 February 12,
2008                              /s/Steve
Khan
 Steve Khan,
 Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 Dated:
 February 12,
2008                              /s/Robert
Hemmerling
 Robert Hemmerling,
 Chief Financial Officer
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of 1

Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L.

Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3367

___________

Lazaro D. Borrero, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Terry Mories, Officer; Dennis L. *

Benson, Warden of Minnesota * [UNPUBLISHED]

Correctional Facility at Stillwater, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: August 12, 1998

 Filed: August 18, 1998

___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Lazaro Borrero, a Minnesota inmate, appeals from the district court’s adverse 1

grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C § 1983 action. After carefully reviewing

the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude the district court did not err in
-2-

granting summary judgment for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s report.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
H. R. 3250 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1210 West 

Main Street in Riverhead, New York, as the ‘‘Private First Class Garfield M. 

Langhorn Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS GARFIELD M. LANGHORN POST 

OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1210 West Main Street in Riverhead, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Private First Class Garfield 

M. Langhorn Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Private First Class Garfield M. Langhorn Post Office 

Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, David Szostak, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of PetroAlgae Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of PetroAlgae Inc.



| |  |                   |  |                                                      
| |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ David Szostak
| |  | Name:   Title:    |  | David Szostak President (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: August 5, 2010

This certification
accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          18,434
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                25,328
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     95,612
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        483,569
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 647,609
<DEPOSITS>                                     523,083
<SHORT-TERM>                                    23,048
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,255
<LONG-TERM>                                     52,055
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,700
<COMMON>                                            72
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 647,609
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,558
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,494
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   267
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,319
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,159
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,038
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,122
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      396
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,241
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,087
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,980
<EPS-BASIC>                                      27.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    27.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.16
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,416
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,263
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,186
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,020
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      238
<RECOVERIES>                                        49
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,227
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,227
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended quarterly report of Emergency Filtration
Products, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Douglas K. Beplate, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Douglas K. Beplate
Douglas K. Beplate, Principal Executive Officer

Date: February 5, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

NICHOLAS MULLINS,

Petitioner

v.

SANDS BETHLEHEM GAMING, LLC

D/B/A SANDS CASINO RESORT

BETHLEHEM,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 441 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### Oliva Esther MORA DE ESCOBAR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70755.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 9, 2011.

Oliva Esther Mora De Escobar, Inglewood, CA, pro se.

OIL, Gladys Marta Steffens Guzman, Esquire, Tracey McDonald, Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr., Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Olivia Esther Mora De Escobar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Mora De Escobar’s contention that she was not advised of her rights before admitting to the charge of alien smuggling because she failed to raise that issue before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (explaining that this court lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.