alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22421]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


FDIC Advisory Committee on Community Banking; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463 (Oct. 6, 1972), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
FDIC Advisory Committee on Community Banking, which will be held in 
Washington, DC. The Advisory Committee will provide advice and 
recommendations on a broad range of policy issues that have particular 
impact on small community banks throughout the United States and the 
local communities they serve, with a focus on rural areas.

DATES: Wednesday, November 1, 2017, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the FDIC Board Room on the sixth 
floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street NW., Washington, 
DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for further information 
concerning the meeting may be directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, 
Committee Management Officer of the FDIC, at (202) 898-7043.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Agenda: The agenda will include a discussion of current issues 
affecting community banking. The agenda is subject to change. Any 
changes to the agenda will be announced at the beginning of the 
meeting.
    Type of Meeting: The meeting will be open to the public, limited 
only by the space available on a first-come, first-served basis. For 
security reasons, members of the public will be subject to security 
screening procedures and must present a valid photo identification to 
enter the building. The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids 
(e.g., sign language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those 
attendees needing such assistance should call (703) 562-6067 (Voice or 
TTY) at least two days before the meeting to make necessary 
arrangements. Written statements may be filed with the committee before 
or after the meeting. This Community Banking Advisory Committee meeting 
will be Webcast live via the Internet http://fdic.windrosemedia.com. 
Questions or troubleshooting help can be found at the same link. For 
optimal viewing, a high speed internet connection is recommended. The 
Community Banking meeting videos are made available on-demand 
approximately two weeks after the event.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

    Dated: October 12, 2017.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-22421 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Order filed, December 3, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00564-CV

____________

JOSE HUERTA, Appellant

V.

ZHONGTIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-DCV-278750

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 9, 2021. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court sent past due notice for the reporter’s record on 

November 10, 2021. No response was received, and the record has not been filed 

with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue 

the following order.

We order Elizabeth Wittu, the court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of  Payment Data Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the
"Form  10-QSB")  of  the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained  in  the  Form  10-QSB  fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.


Date: May 12, 2006

     By: /s/ Michael R. Long
         -------------------
     Michael R. Long
     Chief Executive Officer
     and Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
Exhibit
10.15





First Amendment to
Employment Agreement





This First Amendment (“First
Amendment”), to the Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") dated February 27,
2007 between Payment Data Systems, Inc. ("PDS") and Michael R. Long
(“Executive") is entered into this 12th day of November, 2009 and is
made part of the Agreement
which is hereby amended as follows:





1.           Definitions.  All
capitalized terms used herein and not expressly defined herein shall have the
respective meanings given to such terms in the Agreement.





2.           Entire
Agreement.  Except as expressly modified by this First
Amendment, the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect in
accordance with its terms and shall constitute the legal, valid, binding and
enforceable obligations of PDS and Executive.





3.           Successors and
Assigns.  This First Amendment shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the successors and permitted assigns of the parties
hereto.





4.           Section
References.  Section titles and references used in this First
Amendment shall be without substantive meaning or content of any kind whatsoever
and are not a part of the agreements among the parties hereto evidenced
hereby.





5.           Now,
therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and for
other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy, receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged:





a. The Base Salary as set forth in
Schedule 4(a)(i) of Schedule 1 to the Agreement is hereby amended to be $190,000
per annum in year 2009.





This
First Amendment amends the Agreement as set forth herein. All previously
existing obligations under the Agreement are hereby reaffirmed in all
respects.





In
witness thereof, the parties
hereto have caused thisFirst Amendment to the Agreement to be executed on the day and
year first above written.





Payment Data Systems, Inc.
            ExecutiveBy:
            /s/ Louis A. Hoch
            
            By:
            /s/ Michael R. LongName: Louis A. Hoch
            Name: Michael R. LongTitle:President & COO
Exhibit 10.8


 


BIONDVAX
PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.


 


_______,
_________


 


ATT.





	Registrations Company of Bank Leumi le – Israel Ltd.	This document is
valuable









 


Dear
sirs,


 


Re:
Allotment letter no.         of       option documents
(series            ) of Biondvax Pharmaceuticals Ltd.


 


Here
by allocated to your name are  ________ option documents (series _____) of of Biondvax Pharmaceuticals Ltd. from
no. _______ to no. ______ in accordance with the provision in the Company's shelf prospectus published on _____
_____.


 


The
allocated securities will be registered to your name in the Company's securities registry.


 


This
allotment letter will remain in force as long as you are not given oprion document certificates (series _____) in return for submiting
this letter to the Company.


 


This
allotment letter can be splitted, assigned or waived in accordance with the provisions of the shelf prospectus.


 


Sincerely,


 


Biondvax
Pharmaceuticals Ltd.


 


Advocate's
Certification


I,
the undersigned, Adv. _________, hereby certify that this allotment letter was dully signed by the authorized Company
signtories of Biondvax Pharmaceuticals Ltd.


 


______________


Adv.
__________
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                Certification of the Principal Executive Officers
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

We, Morris H. Wheeler, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Robert W.
Pawlak, the Chief Financial Officer of Cohesant Technologies Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended November 30,
2004 (the "Report"):

                           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
                           of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                           Act of 1934, as amended; and

                           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Morris H. Wheeler
---------------------
Morris H. Wheeler
President and Chief Executive Officer
June 30, 2005

/s/ Robert W. Pawlak
--------------------
Robert W. Pawlak
Chief Financial Officer
June 30, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Payment Data Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 16, 2011
By:
/s/ MichaelR. LongMichael R. LongChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer)
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00201

- CV

CAMMY RAMEY APPELLANT

V.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION, AS TRUS TEE FOR

EMC MORTGAGE CORPORA TION

SERIES BSABS 2003

- AC7 APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LA W NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

On October 7, 2010 , we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed

as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.

38.6(a). We st ated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless

appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.3. We have not recei ved any response.

Because appellant 's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 28, 2010
#### Jill E. Reed et al., Appellants, v Cynthia Fraser, M.D., et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 3.)

[858 NYS2d 923]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Wayne County (Thomas M. Van Strydonck, J.), entered June 7, 2007 in a medical malpractice action. The order denied the motion of plaintiffs for leave to reargue their motion to set aside the verdict in part and for a new trial.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City,*167 AD2d 983, 984 [1990]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P, Martoche, Smith, Green and Pine, JJ.
BLD

- 083 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________
No. 17

- 3677

___________ In re: COREY LANE,

Petitioner

____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 2:16

- cv

- 08948)

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

December 21, 2017

Before: AMBRO, RESTREPO and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed January 8, 2018 )

_________
OPINION *

_________
PER CURIAM
Corey Lane filed a federal civil rights complaint against the State of New Jersey,
raising claims related to a child welfare proceeding in state court. Currently pending in
the District Court are: (1) Lane’s “demand for judgment” under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(c ), see
ECF 40 (filed in May 2017); (2) a fully briefed motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) to

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.2

dismiss Lane’s amended complaint, see ECF 69

- 71 (briefing completed in October
2017); and (3) Lane’s motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) to further amend his

com plaint, see ECF 72 (filed in November 2017), to which New Jersey has not
responded. In December 2017, Lane filed with this Court a petition for a writ of
mandamus, requesting that we compel the District Court to immediately rule on both his
“demand for jud gment” and his motion to amend. 1

Lane’s mandamus petition will be denied. As we have previously indicated to
Lane in denying him mandamus relief, see In re Lane , 697 Fed. App’x 120, 121 (3d Cir.
2017), while issuance of the writ may be warranted when adj udicatory delay by the
District Court is so protracted as to amount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction, see
Madden v. Myers , 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996), we are not yet faced with such delay in
the proceedings below. Cf. id. (8 months of inaction on motion insufficient to compel

mandamus relief). We remain confident that the District Court will, in due course, rule on
the pending motions at issue.

1 The Clerk of the District Court appears to have entered the “demand for judgment” on the docket as a motion seeking relief under F ed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). But Lane had invoked only the language of Rule 54(c) to support a request that the District Court grant him “Habeas Corpus Relief of enforcing my right to unsupervised visitation and unsupervised physical custody of my 4 minor childre n.” ECF 40, p. 4. While Lane’s mandamus petition indicates

— contrary to the text of his Rule 54(c) motion

— that he sought relief under Rule 54(b), this discrepancy is immaterial to our disposition. We note for Lane’s benefit, however, that Rule 54(c) merely “makes clear that a judgment should give the relief to which a party is entitled, regardless of whether it is legal or equitable or both.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 advisory committee’s note to 1937 adoption. It “was meant to protect a plaintiff from clumsy plead ing, which, through technical oversight, might deprive it of a deserved recovery.” USX Corp. v. Barnhart , 395 F.3d 161, 165 (3d Cir. 2004).
NO. 07-05-0398-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D JANUARY

6, 2006

______________________________ TERRY WAYNE STEWART, Appellant
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 2 51st DIS TRICT CO URT OF POT TER COUNT Y; NO. 33,132-C; HON. PATRICK PIRTLE , PRESIDING

_______________________________ ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS an d CAMPBELL, JJ. TerryW ayne Stewart appeals from the trial court’s denial ofhis petition for “ bill of review .” The clerk’s record was due to be filed on December 5, 2005. On December 13, 2005, the clerk fil ed her first ex tension req uest to file the r ecord because appel lant has not paid or made arrang ements to pay for the r ecord and no attorney has been appointed on appeal. Acco rdin gly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 251st District Court of Potte r County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon rema nd, the trial court sh al l2

immediately cau se no tice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determ ine the followin g: 1. whether appel lant desiresto prosecute t he appeal; and, 2. whether appel lant is indi gent and entitled to appointed counsel and a free record on appe al. The trial cour

t shall caus e the hearing to be transcribed. So tooshall it 1) execute findin gs of fact and conclusi ons of law addr essing the for

egoi ng is sues, 2) caus e to be developed a supplemental c lerk’s r ecord containi ng its findi ngs of fact and concl usions of law and all order

s it may i ssue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cau se to be developed a reporter’s record transcrib ing the ev idence and arg uments presented at the af orementioned hearing. Additionally , the distri ct court shal l then file the s upplement a l record and reporter’s record transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this court on or befo re February6, 2006. Should further time be needed by the trial court to perfo rm these tasks, then same must be req uested before Februar y 6, 2006. It is so or

dered. Per Curiam Do not publish

.
#### Susan Angona, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Benjamin Angona, Appellant, v City of Syracuse, Respondent, and ConMed Corp. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[987 NYS2d 289]

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Brian F. DeJoseph, J.), entered August 13, 2013. The order granted the motion of defendant City of Syracuse for renewal of its summary judgment motion and, upon renewal, granted the motion for summary judgment and dismissed the amended complaint and all cross claims against the City of Syracuse.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Angona v City of Syracuse*(118 AD3d 1318 [June 13, 2014]).

Present — Centra, J.E, Peradotto, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.
<PAGE>   1

   Exhibit 10.32

Confidential portions of this document indicated by ***** have been omitted and
filed separately with the Commission


ALCOA                                        Alcoa Extruded
                                             Construction
                                             Products
                                             Alcoa Extrusions, Inc.
                                             1907 Industrial Park Dr.
                                             Plant City FL 33567 USA
                                             Tel: 1 813 752 4117

March 14, 2001


Mr. Gary Ihrke
Vice President of Operations
Featherlite Trailers
P O Box 320
Cresco IA 52136

Dear Gary,

This letter will serve as confirmation of our agreement finalized today. Alcoa
has purchased with your authorization, *****# of aluminum for your extrusion
needs during the 2nd half of this year. The extrusions will be purchased and
delivered at a base price of $***** per # on solid shapes and $***** per # on
hollow shapes. As agreed, any side panels will require a $***** adder. The
extrusions will be delivered from our plant in Yankton, South Dakota.

Gary, the above tonnage will complete our *****# agreement for this year. We
appreciate your business and look forward to opportunities to expand our
partnership with Featherlite Trailers.

Thank you for your business.

Yours truly,

 /s/ Herb Grubbs
Herb Grubbs
Regional Sales Manager


Cc: Bob Roden - Plant City
    Jan Mauch - Yankton
    Craig Lepa - Featherlite
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 9- 00 14 1- CR J esse CA STIL LO , Appellant
v . T h e STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the County

Court at L aw No. 7, Be x ar County , Texas Trial Court No. 227386 Honora ble Monica E. Gue rre ro, Judge Pre siding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J une 17, 2009 DI SMI SSED Appellant has f

iled a motion to dism iss his appeal. The mot ion is gra nted, and this appe al is dismi ssed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.2(a). PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                     As Adopted Pursuant to
                     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David
Dutton, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: February 25, 2008 | /s/ David Dutton
                      David DuttonChief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

---