alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM ELASTIC NETWORKS INC. UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001088242
<NAME> ELASTIC NETWORKS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                           9,720
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,048
<ALLOWANCES>                                       367
<INVENTORY>                                      5,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,645
<PP&E>                                           3,889
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,772
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,994
<COMMON>                                           154
<OTHER-SE>                                    (29,452)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,602
<SALES>                                         25,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,897
<CGS>                                           24,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,982
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,351)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,351)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,351)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.36)


</TABLE>
#### John M. WYATT, Petitioner-Appellant v. Warden, M. Travis BRAGG, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-50691

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 15, 2011.

John M. Wyatt, Anthony, NM, pro se.

Michael A. Rotker, Esq., U.S. Department Of Justice, Washington, DC, Magdalena Gurany Jara, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, El Paso, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

*353PER CURIAM: *

John M. Wyatt, federal prisoner # 04900-051, was convicted of possession with intent to distribute over 100 kilograms of marijuana and was sentenced as a career offender to 262 months in prison. In the district court, he filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his career offender characterization in light of *Begay v. United States,*553 U.S. 137, 128 S.Ct. 1581, 170 L.Ed.2d 490 (2008), and *Chambers v. United States,*555 U.S. 122, 129 S.Ct. 687, 172 L.Ed.2d 484 (2009). He appeals the district court’s construction of this petition as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and its transfer of the case to the Seventh Circuit.

If necessary, we must examine the basis of our jurisdiction sua sponte. *Mosley v. Cozby,*813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.1987). The district court’s transfer order was a nonappealable interlocutory order. *See Brinar v. Williamson,*245 F.3d 515, 516-18 (5th Cir.2001). We are without jurisdiction to consider the present appeal. *See id.*Consequently, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. All outstanding motions are DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 31.2







CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





REQUIRED BY RULE 13A - 14(A) OR RULE 15D - 14(A)





I, Bob Bates, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Inova Technology Inc.





2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:




(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control  over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:March 19, 2010
/s/Bob BatesChief Financial Officer
#### Mohammad Humayun KABIR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-70215.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 18, 2011.

Ebby S. Bakhtiar, Esquire, Livingston, Bakhtiar, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Kristin Edison, Daniel Eric Goldman, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Mohammad Humayun Kabir, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Gonzalez-Hemandez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 995, 998 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that, even if Kabir was persecuted on account of a protected ground, the government rebutted the presumption of a clear probability of future persecution by establishing changed circumstances in Bangladesh. *See Gonzalez-Hemandez,*336 F.3d at 999-1001. The IJ rationally construed evidence in the record and provided a sufficiently individualized analysis of Kabir’s situation. *See id.*at 1000. Ac*634eordingly, Kabir’s withholding of removal claim fails. *See id.*at 1001 n. 5.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

FEMA gives notice that the minimum Project Worksheet Amount under the Public Assistance program for disasters and emergencies declared on or after October 1, 2017, will be increased.

# DATES:

This adjustment applies to major disasters and emergencies declared on or after October 1, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher Logan, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3834.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207 and 44 CFR 206.202(d)(2) provide that FEMA will annually adjust the minimum Project Worksheet amount under the Public Assistance program to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Department of Labor.

FEMA gives notice of an increase to $3,140 for the minimum amount that will be approved for any Project Worksheet under the Public Assistance program for all major disasters and emergencies declared on or after October 1, 2017.

FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers of 1.9 percent for the 12-month period that ended in August 2017. This is based on information released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics at the U.S. Department of Labor on September 14, 2017.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters).

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-22034 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2995 

To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 to 

clarify the low-income housing credits that are eligible for the lowincome housing grant election, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2009 

Mr. DAVIS of Alabama (for himself, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. CAO, Mr. MELANCON, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. 

SCALISE, and Mr. BOSWELL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax 

Act of 2009 to clarify the low-income housing credits 

that are eligible for the low-income housing grant election, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disaster State Hous5 ing Recovery Act of 2009’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2995 IH

1 SEC. 2. LOW-INCOME HOUSING GRANT ELECTION. 

2 (a) CLARIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY OF LOW-INCOME

3 HOUSING CREDITS.—Paragraph (1) of section 1602(b) of 

4 the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘, plus any increase in the 

7 State housing credit ceiling for 2009 attributable to 

8 any State housing credit ceiling returned in 2009 to 

9 the State by reason of section 1400N(c) of such 

10 Code (including as such section is applied by reason 

11 of sections 702(d)(2) and 704(b) of the Tax Extend12 ers and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 

13 2008)’’ after ‘‘1986’’ in subparagraph (A), and 

14 (2) by inserting ‘‘, plus any increase in the 

15 State housing credit ceiling for 2009 attributable to 

16 any additional State housing credit ceiling made by 

17 reason of the application of such section 702(d)(2) 

18 and 704(b)’’ after ‘‘such section’’ in subparagraph 

19 (B). 

20 (b) APPLICATION OF ADDITIONAL HOUSING CREDIT

21 AMOUNT FOR PURPOSES OF 2009 GRANT ELECTION.— 

22 Subsection (b) of section 1602 of such Act is amended 

23 by adding at the end the following flush sentence: ‘‘For 

24 purposes of subparagraph (B), in the case of any area to 

25 which such section 702(d)(2) or 704(b) applies, section 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2995 IH

1 1400N(c)(1)(A) of such Code shall be applied without re2 gard to clause (i).’’. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply as if included in the enactment 

5 of section 1602 of the American Recovery and Reinvest6 ment Tax Act of 2009. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
                                                                    ------------



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                                        


The Board of Directors
U.S. Foodservice:



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-3 (333-59785) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-88140, 33-88142, 33-
88144, 33-88146, 33-81011, 333-37359, 333-43185 and 333-47759) of U.S.
Foodservice of our report, dated August 14, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of U.S. Foodservice and Subsidiaries as of June 28,
1997 and June 27, 1998 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, cash flows and schedules for each of the years then ended,
which report appears in the Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended June 27, 1998.



KPMG LLP


Baltimore, Maryland
January 12, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22353]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than November 1, 2017.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Nathan Halverson, Mason City, Iowa; individually and as co-
trustee of the Richard A. Halverson Disclaimer Trust, and as a group 
acting in concert with Kelli Halverson, Scottsdale, Arizona, and the 
Richard A. Halverson Disclaimer Trust, Mason City, Iowa, co-trustees 
Richard A. Halverson and Nathan Halverson, both of Mason City, Iowa; to 
join Richard A. Halverson as members of the Halverson Family Control 
Group; to retain voting shares of Farmers State Bancshares, Inc., Mason 
City, Iowa, and thereby indirectly retain shares of Farmers State Bank, 
Northwood, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 11, 
2017.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-22353 Filed 10-13-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Michael J. Lambert, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  |                                               
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    MICHAEL J.
LAMBERT
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                     |  | Michael J. Lambert                            
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                    |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9367
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       50
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9417)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5804)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5804)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5804)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)



</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LARRY CHAMBERS AND ABIE

WOLF

,

Appellant s

V.

JUAN CARLOS GARAY

,

Appellee §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 213

- C V

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

o f El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2018DCV1553 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether the appeal of Abie

Wolf should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Wolf has failed to pay the case

filing fee, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Larry Chambers and Abie Wolf, pro se , are appealing an order dismissing their suit against

Juan Carlos Garay. Both Chambers and Wolf personally signed the no tice of appeal, but neither

of them submitted the case filing fee. The Court sent requests for the case filing fee to both

Chambers and Wolf. Chambers paid the filing fee for his appeal, but Wolf did not. There is

nothing in the record before us to indi cate that Wolf is indigent or otherwise excused from paying

the case filing fee. On December 20, 2018

, the Clerk of the Court sent Wolf a second request for

payment of the case filing fee. The letter also notified Wolf that failure to pay the case filing fee- 2

-

within twenty days could result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to

T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.3(b) and (c). Wolf has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to our

notice

. Pursuant to Rule 42.3(b) and (c) , we dismiss the appe al brought by Appellant Wolf for

want of prosecution. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.3(b), (c). The Clerk of the Court is directed to change

the style of the appeal to Larry Chambers v. Juan Carlos Garay

.

January 1 8, 2019

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.