alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0254

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANDREW ORLANDO BIGLEGGINS,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Appellant Andrew Orlando Bigleggins, via counsel, was granted an extension of time to file and serve his opening brief on or before November 12 , 2021 . The opening brief is now overdue. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file , and serve the opening brief on appeal no later than December 23 , 2021 . Failure to file the brief within that time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 23 2021

11/23/2021
Case Number: DA 21-0254
Exhibit
      32.2




**Certification
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




Ladies
      and Gentlemen:




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Featherlite, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jeffery A. Mason, Chief Financial Officer
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




**FEATHERLITE,
              INC.**Date: March
              31, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Jeffery
              A. MasonChief
              Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,491
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       50
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,541)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,491)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,491)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0





</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the audited
consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations as of and for the
twenty-six week period ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          20,519
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    275,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               386,849
<PP&E>                                       7,795,270
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,098,823)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,208,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,938,019
<BONDS>                                         44,891
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,675
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,547,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,208,924
<SALES>                                      7,597,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,613,092
<CGS>                                        2,614,659
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,730,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              84,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (217,289)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (217,289)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (217,289)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
Term Note made by CHP Partners, LP



 Exhibit 10.3 

TERM NOTE 
  

					
	$32,407,407.00	 	Dallas, Texas	 	December 19, 2014

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned (“Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to KEYBANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, or registered assigns (“Lender”), in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement (as hereinafter defined), the principal amount of each Loan from time to time made by the
Lender to Borrower under that certain Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2014 (as amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise modified in writing from time to time, the “Agreement”; the
terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among Borrower, the lenders from time to time party thereto, and KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent. 

Borrower promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Loan from the date of such Loan until such principal amount is paid
in full, at such interest rates and at such times as provided in the Agreement. All payments of principal and interest shall be made to Agent for the account of the Lender in Dollars in immediately available funds at the Administrative Agent’s
Office. If any amount is not paid in full when due hereunder, such unpaid amount shall bear interest, to be paid upon demand, from the due date thereof until the date of actual payment (and before as well as after judgment) computed at the per annum
rate set forth in the Agreement. 
 This Note is one of the Term Notes referred to in the Agreement, is entitled to the benefits thereof and
may be prepaid in whole or in part subject to the terms and conditions provided therein. No amount borrowed hereunder and repaid may be reborrowed. This Note is unsecured. Upon the occurrence and continuation of one or more of the Events of Default
specified in the Agreement, all amounts then remaining unpaid on this Note shall become, or may be declared to be, immediately due and payable all as provided in the Agreement. Loans made by the Lender shall be evidenced by one or more loan accounts
or records maintained by the Lender in the ordinary course of business. The Lender may also attach schedules to this Note and endorse thereon the date, amount and maturity of its Loans and payments with respect thereto. 

Borrower, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby waives diligence, presentment, protest and demand and notice of protest, demand,
dishonor and non-payment of this Note. 
 THIS NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO.








 
							
	BORROWER:
	
	CHP PARTNERS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership
		
	By:	 	CHP GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, General Partner
			
		 	By:	 	CNL Healthcare Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, Managing Member
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Tracey B. Bracco

		 		 		 	Tracey B. Bracco, Vice President



  

			
	PROMISSORY NOTE	  	Page 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. William Charles WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30637

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

Douglas Lee Harville, Harville Law Firm, L.L.C., Shreveport, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent William Charles Wright has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Wright has not filed a resp’onse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Steve Y. GARRISON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. GARCIA-HUERTA; Torres, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 06-16740.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 1, 2008.

Steve Y. Garrison, San Jose, CA, pro se.

*644Melissa R. Kiniyalocts, Esq., Santa Clara County Counsel’s Office, San Jose, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Steve Y. Garrison appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his Eighth Amendment rights while he was housed at the Santa Clara County Jail. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Clement v. Gomez,*298 F.3d 898, 901 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Garrison’s conclusory allegations that prison officials used excessive force were insufficient to controvert defendants’ evidence showing that force was applied “in a good faith effort to restore discipline and order and not maliciously and sadistically for the very purpose of causing harm.” *Id.*at 903; *see also Jeffers v. Gomez,*267 F.3d 895, 907 (9th Cir.2001) (per curiam) (stating that to survive summary judgment, plaintiff must put forward specific, non-conclusory factual allegations that establish defendants acted with improper motives).

We do not consider arguments raised for the first time in Garrison’s reply brief. *See Eberle v. City of Anaheim,*901 F.2d 814, 818 (9th Cir.1990).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of  Payment Data Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the
"Form  10-QSB")  of  the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained  in  the  Form  10-QSB  fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.


Date:  August  14,  2006

     By:     /s/  Michael  R.  Long
             ----------------------
     Michael  R.  Long
     Chief  Executive  Officer
     and  Chief  Financial  Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,350,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  187,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,100
<INVENTORY>                                     72,908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,773,802
<PP&E>                                      12,536,653
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,452,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,189,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,738,233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,720
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,417,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,189,033
<SALES>                                      3,650,231
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,330,508
<CGS>                                        1,627,418
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,765,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (27,951)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                558,461
<INCOME-TAX>                                   121,170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            437,291
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   437,291
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22440]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 18, 2017, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Advanced Media Workflow 
Association, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Bosch Security Systems, Inc., Fairport, NY; Juniper 
Networks, Sunnyvale, CA; Korean Broadcast System, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF 
KOREA; Telstra, Melbourne, AUSTRALIA; Xytech Systems, Chatsworth, CA; 
and Yamaha Corporation, Hamamatsu, JAPAN, have been added as parties to 
this venture.
    Also, Digital Media Centre B.V., Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS; IBM, 
Somers, NY; MNC Software, Inc., San Diego, CA; Real-Time Innovations 
(RTI), Sunnyvale, CA; SVT, Stockholm, SWEDEN; TransMedia Dynamics Ltd., 
Aylesbury, UNITED KINGDOM; Laurence Cook (individual member), Portland, 
OR; Gabor Fogacs (individual member), Budapest, HUNGARY; Laurance 
Hughes (individual member), Sydney, AUSTRALIA; Douglas McGee 
(individual member), Columbus, OH; Christiano Nuernberg (individual 
member), Cambridge, MA; and Joseph Spillman (individual member), 
Temecula, CA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Advanced Media Workflow Association, 
Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all 
changes in membership.
    On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. filed 
its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 26, 
2017. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 20, 2017 (82 FR 33516).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-22440 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Bath Iron Works Corporation ) ASBCA No. 62771

)

Under Contract No. N00024

- 09

- C

- 2302 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : David Robbins, Esq.

Won K. Lee, Esq.

Jenner & Block , LLC

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Nicole R. Best, Esq.

David M. Marquez, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated : January 25 , 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62771

, Appeal of Bath Iron Works

Corporation , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: January 27, 2022 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of
Mymetics Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, does make, constitute and appoint
John M. Musacchio, with full power and authority, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, for him and his name, place and stead in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report of Mymetics Corporation on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002, and to file such Annual Report, so signed,
with all exhibits thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby
further granting unto said attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and
perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do
in person, the undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorney
and agent shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE UNDERSIGNED HAS HEREUNTO SET HIS HAND AND SEAL
THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2003.


                                     /s/ PIERRE-FRANCOIS SERRES
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Pierre-Francois Serres, Director
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7053

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LEROY BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-62-P, CA-97-193-3-P) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 21, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leroy Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Frank DeArmon Whitney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Leroy Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994& Supp. 1998), and denying his motion for a certificate of appealability. We dismiss the appeal from the denial of § 2255 relief for lack of jurisdiction. Brown filed the notice of appeal outside the sixty-day appeal period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), and he failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or (6). With regard to the denial of the motion for a certificate of appealability, we have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this portion of the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brown , Nos. CR-92-62-P; CA-97-193-3-P (W.D.N.C. June 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED