alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

Union Calendar No. 409 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2811 

[Report No. 111–693] 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to include constrictor snakes of 

the species Python genera as an injurious animal. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2009 

Mr. MEEK of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

DECEMBER 21, 2010 

Additional sponsors: Mr. ROONEY, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. 

HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. WEXLER, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. 

MORAN of Virginia, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. LEVIN, Ms. JACKSON LEE of 

Texas, Mr. POSEY, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. MASSA, Mr. FARR, Mr. 

FATTAH, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. DEUTCH, and Ms. CASTOR of Florida 

DECEMBER 21, 2010 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2811 RH

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to include constrictor 

snakes of the species Python genera as an injurious animal. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2811 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPORTATION OR SHIPMENT OF INJURIOUS 

4 SPECIES. 

5 Section 42(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended in the first sentence by inserting ‘‘; of the con7 strictor snake of the species Python genera’’ after 

8 ‘‘polymorpha’’. 

9 SECTION 1. IMPORTATION OR SHIPMENT OF INJURIOUS 

10 SPECIES. 

11 Section 42(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is 

12 amended in the first sentence by inserting ‘‘; of the Burmese 

13 Python of the species Python molurus bivittatus; of the Afri14 can Rock Python of the species Python sebae’’ after 

15 ‘‘polymorpha’’. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 409 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2811 

[Report No. 111–693] 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to include 

as an injurious animal. constrictor snakes of the species Python genera 

DECEMBER 21, 2010 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
## United States Court of App eals F O R T H E E I G H T H

C I R C U I T

__ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 1- 25 58

__ __ __ __ __ _ Cu rti s J am es Neel ey , Jr., MF A, * * App el la nt , * * v. * * Nam eMe di a, In c., * * App el le e, * App eal fro m th e Uni te d S ta te s * Dis tri ctCo ur t fo r th e Netwo rkSo lu ti on s, * W es te rnDis tri ctof Ark an sa s. * Defen da nt , * [UNPUBLISHED] * Goo gl e, In c., * * App el le e. * *

----- ----- ----- - * * Nam eMe di a, In c., * * Co un te r Cl ai m an t, * * v. * * Cu rti s J am es Neel ey , Jr., MF A, * * Co un te r Defen da nt
. *

__ __ __ __ __ _Subm it te d: Feb ru ary 3, 2 01 2 Fi le d: Feb ru ary 15 , 20 12

__ __ __ __ __ _ Befo re BYE, COLLOTON, an d GRUENDER, Ci rcu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ _ PER CURI AM. Fo ll owi ng th e ad ve rs e res ol ut io n of hi s ci vi l act io n, Cu rti s Neel ey ap pe al s th e di st ric t co urt’s di sm is sa l o f c ert ai n cl ai m s, an d th e co ur t’s refu sa l to al lo w 1 am en dm en t of hi s co m

pl ai nt
. Upo n care fu l rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at di sm is sa l of hi s 17 U.S.C. § 10 6A cl ai m s was pr op er fo r th e reas on s st at ed by th e di st ric t co ur t in it s Ju ne 7, 20 11 or de r de nyin g Neel ey ’s m ot io n fo r reco ns id erat io n. W e al so co nc lu de th at th e co ur t di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n in de nyin g Neel ey fu rth er le av e to am en d aft er he fil ed a se co nd am en de d co m pl ai nt , as th e pr op os ed am en dm en ts he hi gh li gh ts on ap pe al wou ld ha ve be en fu ti le

. See Den ni s v. Dil la rd Dep ’t St or es , In c., 20 7 F.3 d 52 3, 5 25 (8t h C ir. 2 00 0) . Accor di ng ly, we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Ji m

m Larry Hen dr en , Ch ie f Judge, Unit ed St at es D is tri ct Co urt 1 fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s. -2

-
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 2716 Lower Tribunal No. 2022

- CA

- 002636

- O

_____________________________ R OBERT A RNAZ R ACKARD , Appellant,

v. N ATION S TAR M ORTGAGE , LLC d/b/a M R
. C OOPER and J OHNATHAN M EISELS , Appellee s
.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County

. Vincent Falcone, III , Judge. May 3, 2024
PER CURIAM

. Due to Appellant Robert Arnaz Rackard ’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his repetitive and frivolous pro se filings contesting the foreclosure judgment entered against him in Orange County Circuit Court Case N o. 2022

- CA

- 002636

- O, this Court issued an order directing Appellant to show c ause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Appellant filed a response, which we have reviewed

. Finding Appellant has failed to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that2 Appellant is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.
T

o conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning Orange County Circuit Court Case No.
2022

- CA

- 002636

- O. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. The Clerk will summarily reject any future filings regarding the referenced case unless filed by a member in good stand ing of The Florida Bar.
FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED. TRAVER, C.J., and WOZNIAK and BROWNLEE , JJ., concur.
Robert Arnaz Rackard, Orlando, pro se. Dorrella L. Gallaway , of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper. No Appearance for Appellee, Johnathan Meisels.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 of Dutch Gold Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Keaveney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 Date: April 1, 2011
 
 /s/ Steven Keaveney
 Steven Keaveney, Chief Financial Officer
 (principal accounting officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 03 50 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL JOSEPH CROWELL,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until October 27 , 202 1 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 20 2021

09/20/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0350
#### In the Matter of Cindy Chavis, Petitioner, v City of Poughkeepsie Office of Social Development et al., Respondents.

[860 NYS2d 200]

*709Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the City of Poughkeepsie Office of Social Development dated June 5, 2006, which, after a hearing, confirmed the termination of the petitioner’s participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program *(see*42 USC § 1437f [b] [1]).

Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, the determination is annulled, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the respondents for a new fair hearing at which the petitioner is to be represented by an assigned attorney or the advocate or advocates *(see*14 NYCRR 635-99.1 [b]) she sought to have assist her at the hearing held on May 31, 2006.

The petitioner’s housing benefits pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 USC § 1437f [hereinafter Section 8]) were terminated, after a fair hearing held at the offices of the City of Poughkeepsie Office of Social Development, on the ground that she intentionally failed to report that her ex-husband resided with her in the subject apartment. The petitioner was advised, in a letter from the United States Social Security Administration, that she was disabled due to her mental retardation. Despite that fact, during the course of the hearing, an advocate for the petitioner, Priscilla Taylor *(see*14 NYCRR 635-99.1 [b]), was first excluded from participating in the proceeding in that capacity due to her status as a potential witness on the dynamics of domestic violence, but nonetheless did not testify due to what appears to be a mixup in notifying her when her testimony would be required. Ultimately, it appears that her testimony may not have been necessary, as the hearing officer determined, in any event, that he would consider the issue of domestic violence, based on evidence from other sources, in making his determination.

The hearing officer abused his discretion in his rulings concerning the petitioner’s advocate Priscilla Taylor, among which was her exclusion from the proceeding in her capacity as the petitioner’s advocate. Therefore, under the unique circumstances of this case, we annul the determination confirming the termination of the petitioner’s participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program and remit the matter to the respondents for a new fair hearing at which the petitioner can be properly represented either by an assigned attorney or the advocate or advocates she sought to have represent her at the original hearing on this matter *(cf. John P. v Axelrod,*105 AD2d 1061 [1984]; *Matter of Galluzzo v Blum,*97 AD2d 823 [1983]).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the petitioner’s remaining contention. Spolzino, J.P, Florio, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
September 30, 2000 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statement.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           18,484,839
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5,256,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                        892,383
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 29,874,839
<PP&E>                                            6,341,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,495,823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   38,008,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6,420,632
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            142,675
<OTHER-SE>                                       30,469,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     38,008,416
<SALES>                                          21,624,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 21,624,345
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 40,244,111
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  110,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,493,672)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,493,672)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,493,672)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.40)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code  I, Edward Suydam, the Chief Executive Officer of Nano Mask, Inc. (Nano Mask), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the accompanying Form 10-Q of Nano Mask for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nano Mask.  /s/ Edward Suydam Edward Suydam Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Nano Mask, Inc.  June 30, 2011
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert Hemmerling, President and Chief Executive Officer of Eye Catching Marketing Corporation, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Eye Catching Marketing Corporation;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.







May 11, 2006

/s/Robert Hemmerling

Date

Robert Hemmerling,

President and Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7846** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
WILLIE JEROME MCRAE , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Fox , Senior District Judge. ( 5:98

- cr - 00037

- F

- 13 )

Submitted : June 24, 2010 Decided: June 29, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

W illie Jerome McRae, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Willie Jerome McRae appeals the district c ourt ’ s order denying relief on his motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. McRae , No. 5:98

- cr - 00037

- F

- 13 (E.D.N.C. Sep t. 22,
2009) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3192 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the 

Secretary of State, to establish a program to issue Asia-Pacific Economic 

Cooperation Business Travel Cards, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2009 

Mr. LARSEN of Washington (for himself, Mr. HERGER, Mr. CROWLEY, and 

Mr. BRADY of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, to establish a program 

to issue Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Business 

Travel Cards, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Asia-Pacific Economic 

5 Cooperation Business Travel Cards Act of 2009’’. 


jbell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3192 IH

1 SEC. 2. ASIA-PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION BUSINESS 

2 TRAVEL CARDS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 1, 2010, 

4 the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with 

5 the Secretary of State, shall establish a program called 

6 the ‘‘APEC Business Travel Program’’ to issue Asia-Pa7 cific Economic Cooperation Business Travel Cards 

8 (ABTC) to eligible United States citizen business leaders 

9 and senior United States Government officials actively en10 gaged in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) busi11 ness. 

12 (b) INTEGRATION WITH EXISTING TRAVEL PRO13 GRAMS.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall inte14 grate application procedures for and issuance of ABTC 

15 with other appropriate international registered traveler 

16 programs of the Department of Homeland Security, such 

17 as Global Entry, NEXUS, and SENTRI. 

18 (c) COOPERATION WITH PRIVATE ENTITIES.—In 

19 carrying out this section, the Secretary of Homeland Secu20 rity shall work in conjunction with appropriate private sec21 tor entities to ensure that applicants for ABTC satisfy 

22 ABTC requirements. The Secretary of Homeland Security 

23 may utilize such entities to enroll and issue ABTC to 

24 qualified applicants. 

25 (d) FEE.— 


jbell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3192 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Homeland 

2 Security may impose a fee for the issuance of 

3 ABTC, and may modify such fee from time to time 

4 as the Secretary determines appropriate. 

5 (2) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Homeland 

6 Security shall ensure that the total amount of any 

7 fees imposed under paragraph (1) in any fiscal year 

8 does not exceed the costs associated with carrying 

9 out this section in such fiscal year. 

10 (3) CREDITING TO APPROPRIATE ACCOUNT.— 

11 Fees collected under paragraph (1) shall be credited 

12 to the appropriate account of the Department of 

13 Homeland Security and are authorized to remain 

14 available until expended. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-96582, No. 33-96580 and No. 333-34509 of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation
on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 33-81262C on form S-3 of Canterbury
Park Holding Corporation of our report dated March 15, 1999 appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 1998.

Deloitte & Touche LLP




Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 26, 1999



                                       39
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Mymetics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Christian J.F. Rochet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ernst Luebke,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Christian J.F. Rochet
    -----------------------------
    Christian J.F. Rochet
    Chief Executive Officer


By: /s/ Ernst Luebke
    -----------------------------
    Ernst Luebke
    Chief Financial Officer

March 30, 2007
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

Maturity Date Extension 

January 17, 2014 
 For good and valuable
consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to extend the maturity date of that certain Promissory Note, dated February 6, 2009 (the “Note”), granted by First Physicians Capital Group,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), to the undersigned (the “Holder”), to June 30, 2014. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Waiver to be executed as of the date first set forth above. 
  

													
	Original Outstanding Principal of Holder’s Note:	 	  



													
				
	If Holder is an individual:	 		 		 	If Holder is an entity:
				
	  
	 		 		 	  

	Signature	 		 		 	Name of Entity
						
	Printed Name:	 	  
	 		 		 	By:	 	  

		 		 		 		 		 	Signature
	Date:	 	  
	 		 		 		 		 	
		 		 		 		 		 	Name:	 	  

							
		 		 		 		 		 	Title:	 	  

							
		 		 		 		 		 	Date:	 	  


  

			
	FIRST PHYSICIANS CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Sean Kirrane
		 	Chief Executive Officer