alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Quick-Med
      Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Nam H. Nguyen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify, pursuant Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
      my
      knowledge:





|(a) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|(b) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Dated:
      May 15, 2007     /s/
      Nam H. Nguyen____________


Nam
      H. Nguyen


Chief
      Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 ARTES MEDICAL, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ Peter C. WulffPeter C. WulffExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: March  30, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7569

DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NOLAN B. JONES, Chairman of Board of Commissioners; CHARLES BATTLE, JR., Commissioner;

LESLIE D. STRAYHORN, Commissioner; SONDRA

RIGGS, Commissioner; REYNOLDS MASON, Sheriff;

TIM MORTON, Deputy; UNKNOWN DEPUTY; BILLY W.

WHITE; HORACE PHILLIPS, Member of Commissioners; JONES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 95-7754

DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NOLAN B. JONES, Chairman of Board of Commissioners; CHARLES BATTLE, JR., Commissioner;

LESLIE D. STRAYHORN, Commissioner; SONDRA

RIGGS, Commissioner; REYNOLDS MASON, Sheriff;

TIM MORTON, Deputy; UNKNOWN DEPUTY; BILLY W.

WHITE; HORACE PHILLIPS, Member of Commissioners; JONES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Fox, Chief

District Judge. (CA-95-76)

Submitted: August 5, 1997 Decided: October 9, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Scott Pierce,

WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina;

Thomas Giles Meacham, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH

CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and order retaining the record in the district court. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and orders and find no reversible error. The

claims Willis raises do not meet the constitutional standards required to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). The district

court did not abuse its discretion in denying Willis's motions to

amend the caption and complaint. The district court properly

retained the record while motions in the case were still pending.

We deny Willis's motions for oral argument. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 99.1


                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                       FIRST NORTH AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK

                   -------------------------------------------

                      CIRCUIT CITY CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST
                   -------------------------------------------


         The  undersigned,  a duly  authorized  representative  of  First  North
American  National Bank, as Servicer (the  "Servicer"),  pursuant to the Amended
and Restated  Master  Pooling and Servicing  Agreement  dated as of December 31,
2001 (as such  agreement may have been,  or may, from time to time be,  amended,
supplemented  or otherwise  modified,  the "Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement"),
among Tyler  International  Funding,  Inc., as Transferor,  First North American
National  Bank,  as  Transferor  under the Prior  Agreement  (as  defined in the
Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement)  and as  Servicer,  and  Deutsche  Bank Trust
Company  Americas  (formerly  known as Bankers Trust  Company),  as Trustee (the
"Trustee"),  does  hereby  certify  to the  best of his or her  knowledge  after
reasonable investigation that:

         1. Capitalized  terms used in  this  certificate  have their respective
meanings set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

         2. The Servicer is as of the date hereof the Servicer under the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement.

         3. The undersigned is a Servicing Officer.

         4. This certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.5 of the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement.

         5. A review of the  activities  of the Servicer  during the Fiscal Year
ended February 28, 2002 and of its  performance  under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement was made under the supervision of the undersigned.

         6. Based on such review,  to the best of the  undersigned's  knowledge,
the  Servicer  has fully  performed  all its  obligations  under the Pooling and
Servicing  Agreement  throughout  such Fiscal Year and no event which,  with the
giving of notice or passage of time or both, would constitute a Servicer Default
has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 7 below.

         7. The  following is a description  of each Servicer  Default under the
provisions of the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement  known to the  undersigned to
have occurred  during the Fiscal Year ended February 28, 2002,  which sets forth
in detail the (i) nature of each such Servicer Default, (ii) the action taken by
the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such Servicer Default and (iii) the current
status of each such Servicer Default: Not applicable.





         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned,  a duly  authorized  Servicing
Officer, has duly executed this certificate this 29th day of May, 2002.


                              /s/ Philip J. Dunn
                              ---------------------
                              Name: Philip J. Dunn
                              Title: Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6738

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CHARLES LEE TORIAN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, Senior

District Judge. (4:01-cr-70057-NKM-1; 4:15-cv-80813-NKM-RSB)

Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 25, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Lee Torian, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Lee Torian seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order construing his motion to correct a clerical error as a 

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying it on that 

basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Torian has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 08, 2014. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 08, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15I0063. NANCY A. FELIX et al. v. JUDITH ANN MCCLELLAN. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 13C05995
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOHN ROMAGNOLO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 458 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of January, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3224 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2009 

Received 

DECEMBER 24, 2009 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to plan, design, and construct a vehicle maintenance building at the vehicle maintenance branch of the 

Smithsonian Institution located in Suitland, Maryland, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3224 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING, SUITLAND, 

2 MARYLAND. 

3 (a) AUTHORITY TO PLAN, DESIGN, AND CON4 STRUCT.—The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Insti5 tution is authorized to plan, design, and construct a vehi6 cle maintenance building at the vehicle maintenance 

7 branch of the Smithsonian Institution located in Suitland, 

8 Maryland. 

9 (b) PURPOSE OF BUILDING.—The purpose of the 

10 building shall be to provide a facility to be used for hous11 ing, maintaining, and repairing vehicles and transpor12 tation equipment of the Smithsonian Institution. 

13 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

14 There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

15 this Act $4,000,000 for fiscal year 2010. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00080-CR

Ernesto Rodriguez

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16FC-1665-E

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 7, 2020
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21953]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2017 / 
Notices

[[Page 47171]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Golden 
Valley Organics, Inc. (dba) BioWest Ag Solutions of Nampa, Idaho, an 
exclusive license to U.S. Patent No. 9,414,602, ``PSEUDOMONAS 
FLUORESCENS INHIBIT ANNUAL BLUEGRASS AND ROUGH BLUEGRASS ROOT GROWTH 
AND GERMINATION'', issued on August 16, 2016.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 13, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian T. Nakanishi of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Golden Valley Organics, Inc. 
(dba) BioWest Ag Solutions of Nampa, Idaho has submitted a complete and 
sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive license 
will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license 
may be granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this 
published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written 
evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license 
would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 
CFR 404.7.

Mojdeh Bahar,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-21953 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 332 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 332

   To provide that no funds made available to the Department of the 
 Treasury may be used to implement, administer, or enforce regulations 
 to require specific licenses for travel-related transactions directly 
               related to educational activities in Cuba.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2009

Ms. Lee of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that no funds made available to the Department of the 
 Treasury may be used to implement, administer, or enforce regulations 
 to require specific licenses for travel-related transactions directly 
               related to educational activities in Cuba.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pursuit of International Education 
(PIE) Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT, ADMINISTER, OR ENFORCE 
              REGULATIONS TO REQUIRE SPECIFIC LICENSES FOR TRAVEL-
              RELATED TRANSACTIONS DIRECTLY RELATED TO EDUCATIONAL 
              ACTIVITIES IN CUBA.

    (a) Limitation.--No funds made available to the Department of the 
Treasury may be used to implement, administer, or enforce the 
amendments made to paragraphs (a) and (b) of section 515.565 of title 
31, Code of Federal Regulations (relating to specific licenses for 
United States academic institutions and other specific licenses), as 
published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2004 (69 Fed. Reg. 
33772).
    (b) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply to 
the implementation, administration, or enforcement of section 
515.560(c)(3) of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
#### Lionel S. Clark, as Administrator of the Estate of Lionel Clark, II, Deceased, Respondent, v State of New York, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 209]

—In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Ruderman, J.), dated July 2, 1996, which, upon a finding that the claimant and the defendant are each 50% at fault in the happening of the accident, is in favor of the claimant and against the defendant in the principal sum of $54,067.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The claimant’s decedent Lionel Clark II was injured while playing basketball in a State park in Yorktown, New York. The trial court correctly concluded that the claimant’s decedent did not assume the risk of an injury caused by a steep drop-off several inches from the edge of the playing area’s asphalt surface since this “created a dangerous condition over and above the usual dangers that are inherent in the sport” *(Owen v R.J.S. Safety Equip.,*79 NY2d 967, 970; *see, Morgan v State of New York,*90 NY2d 471, 485). Accordingly, the claimant’s decedent cannot be deemed to have legally assumed the risk of an injury which proximately resulted from such a condition *(see, Turcotte v Fell,*68 NY2d 432). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report of Quick-Med Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").





In connection with the  Report, I, J. Ladd Greeno, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the date and for the periods indicated.











Dated:  May 16, 2012                                                                 /s/  J. Ladd Greeno_______________________________


J. Ladd Greeno


Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp.(“the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Kirk C. Saylor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.        By: /s/ Kirk C. Saylor          Kirk C. Saylor, Chief Financial Officer    May 10, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5





<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         935,639
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  38,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    30,534
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,037,090
<PP&E>                                         51,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,735
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,151,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          72,775
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       951,531
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,151,528
<SALES>                                        748,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               748,228
<CGS>                                          135,391
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               293,531
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                319,115
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            319,115
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   319,115
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.014
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.009




</TABLE>