Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 17, 2017 / Notices 48267 

calendar days, made an offer to acquire, 

expressed an interest in acquiring, 

entered into negotiations to acquire, or 

was contacted or made an inquiry about 

acquiring, any interest in the Divestiture 

Assets, and shall describe in detail each 

contact with any such person during 

that period. Each such affidavit shall 

also include a description of the efforts 

defendants have taken to solicit buyers 

for the Divestiture Assets, and to 

provide required information to 

prospective Acquirers, including the 

limitations, if any, on such information. 

Assuming the information set forth in 

the affidavit is true and complete, any 

objection by the United States to 

information provided by defendants, 

including limitation on information, 

shall be made within fourteen (14) 

calendar days of receipt of such 

affidavit. 

B. Within twenty (20) calendar days 

of the filing of the Complaint in this 

matter, defendants shall deliver to the 

United States an affidavit that describes 

in reasonable detail all actions 

defendants have taken and all steps 

defendants have implemented on an 

ongoing basis to comply with Section 

VIII of this Final Judgment. Defendants 

shall deliver to the United States an 

affidavit describing any changes to the 

efforts and actions outlined in 

defendants’ earlier affidavits filed 

pursuant to this section within fifteen 

(15) calendar days after the change is 

implemented. 

C. Defendants shall keep all records of 

all efforts made to preserve and divest 

the Divestiture Assets until one year 

after such divestiture has been 

completed. 

X. COMPLIANCE INSPECTION 

A. For the purposes of determining or 

securing compliance with this Final 

Judgment, or of any related orders such 

as any Hold Separate Stipulation and 

Order, or of determining whether the 

Final Judgment should be modified or 

vacated, and subject to any legallyrecognized privilege, from time to time 

authorized representatives of the United 

States Department of Justice, including 

consultants and other persons retained 

by the United States, shall, upon written 

request of an authorized representative 

of the Assistant Attorney General in 

charge of the Antitrust Division, and on 

reasonable notice to defendants, be 

permitted: 

1) access during defendants’ office hours to 

inspect and copy, or at the option of the 

United States, to require defendants to 

provide hard copy or electronic copies of, all 

books, ledgers, accounts, records, data, and 

documents in the possession, custody, or 

control of defendants, relating to any matters 

contained in this Final Judgment; and 

2) to interview, either informally or on the 

record, defendants’ officers, employees, or 

agents, who may have their individual 

counsel present, regarding such matters. The 

interviews shall be subject to the reasonable 

convenience of the interviewee and without 

restraint or interference by defendants. 

B. Upon the written request of an 

authorized representative of the 

Assistant Attorney General in charge of 

the Antitrust Division, defendants shall 

submit written reports or response to 

written interrogatories, under oath if 

requested, relating to any of the matters 

contained in this Final Judgment as may 

be requested. 

C. No information or documents 

obtained by the means provided in this 

section shall be divulged by the United 

States to any person other than an 

authorized representative of the 

executive branch of the United States, 

except in the course of legal proceedings 

to which the United States is a party 

(including grand jury proceedings), or 

for the purpose of securing compliance 

with this Final Judgment, or as 

otherwise required by law. 

D. If at the time information or 

documents are furnished by defendants 

to the United States, defendants 

represent and identify in writing the 

material in any such information or 

documents to which a claim of 

protection may be asserted under Rule 

26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, and defendants mark each 

pertinent page of such material, 

‘‘Subject to claim of protection under 

Rule 26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure,’’ then the United States 

shall give defendants ten (10) calendar 

days notice prior to divulging such 

material in any legal proceeding (other 

than a grand jury proceeding). 

XI. NO REACQUISITION 

Defendants may not reacquire any 

part of the Divestiture Assets during the 

term of this Final Judgment. 

XII. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 

This Court retains jurisdiction to 

enable any party to this Final Judgment 

to apply to this Court at any time for 

further orders and directions as may be 

necessary or appropriate to carry out or 

construe this Final Judgment, to modify 

any of its provisions, to enforce 

compliance, and to punish violations of 

its provisions. 

XIII. EXPIRATION OF FINAL 

JUDGMENT 

Unless this Court grants an extension, 

this Final Judgment shall expire ten (10) 

years from the date of its entry. 

XIV. PUBLIC INTEREST 

DETERMINATION 

Entry of this Final Judgment is in the 

public interest. The parties have 

complied with the requirements of the 

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 

15 U.S.C. 16, including making copies 

available to the public of this Final 

Judgment, the Competitive Impact 

Statement, and any comments thereon 

and the United States’ responses to 

comments. Based upon the record 

before the Court, which includes the 

Competitive Impact Statement and any 

comments and response to comments 

filed with the Court, entry of this Final 

Judgment is in the public interest. 

Date: 

Court approval subject to procedures of 

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 

U.S.C. 16. 

lllllllllllllllllllll

United States District Judge 

[FR Doc. 2017–22443 Filed 10–16–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Border Security 

Technology Consortium 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

September 22, 2017, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 

Border Security Technology Consortium 

(‘‘BSTC’’) has filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Michigan Technology 

University, Houghton, MI; and TRI–COR 

Industries, Inc., Alexandria, VA, have 

been added as parties to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and BSTC intends 

to file additional written notifications 

disclosing all changes in membership. 

On May 30, 2012, BSTC filed its 

original notification pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on June 18, 2012 (77 FR 36292). 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
48268 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 17, 2017 / Notices 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on June 8, 2017. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the 

Act on July 25, 2017 (85 FR 34551). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2017–22442 Filed 10–16–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Membership of the Senior Executive 

Service Standing Performance Review 

Boards 

AGENCY: Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Notice of Department of 

Justice’s standing members of the Senior 

Executive Service Performance Review 

Boards. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice. 

announces the membership of its 2017 

Senior Executive Service (SES) Standing 

Performance Review Boards (PRBs). The 

purpose of a PRB is to provide fair and 

impartial review of SES performance 

appraisals, bonus recommendations and 

pay adjustments. The PRBs will make 

recommendations regarding the final 

performance ratings to be assigned, SES 

bonuses and/or pay adjustments to be 

awarded. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary A. Lamary, Director, Human 

Resources, Justice Management 

Division, Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20530; (202) 514–4350. 

Lee J. Lofthus, 

Assistant Attorney General for 

Administration. 

2017 FEDERAL REGISTER

Name Position title 

Office of the Attorney General—OAG 

HUNT, JODY (DETAIL) .................. CHIEF OF STAFF AND COUNSELOR. 

MORRISSEY, BRIAN ..................... COUNSELOR TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

CUTRONA, DANIELLE ................... SENIOR COUNSELOR. 

Office of the Deputy Attorney General—ODAG 

HUR, ROBERT ............................... PRINCIPAL ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

SWANSON, JAMES ....................... ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

SCHOOLS, SCOTT ........................ ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

GUAHAR, TASHINA ....................... ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

CROWELL, JAMES A ..................... CHIEF OF STAFF/ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

CONNOLLY, ROBERT ................... DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF SMALL AND DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS UTILIZATION. 

GOLDSMITH, ANDREW ................. NATIONAL CRIMINAL DISCOVERY COORDINATOR. 

MICHALIC, MARK .......................... EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND CRISIS RESPONSE COORDINATOR. 

GEISE, JOHN ................................. CHIEF, PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT REVIEW UNIT. 

Office of the Associate Attorney General—OASG 

PANUCCIO, JESSE ........................ PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

MCARTHUR, ERIC ......................... DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

COX, STEVE .................................. DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

MURRAY, BRIAN ........................... DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

FRANCISCO, NOEL ....................... SENIOR ADVISOR. 

Office of the Solicitor General—OSG 

WALL, JEFFREY ............................ PRINCIPAL DEPUTY SOLICITOR GEN. 

DREEBEN, MICHAEL R ................. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL. 

KNEEDLER, EDWIN S ................... DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL. 

STEWART, MALCOLM L ............... DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL. 

Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties 

WINN, PETER ................................ DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES. 

Antitrust Division—ATR 

FINCH, ANDREW ........................... PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

NIGRO, BERNARD ......................... DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

ARMINGTON, ELIZABETH J ......... CHIEF, ECONOMIC REGULATORY SECTION. 

BRINK, PATRICIA A ....................... DIRECTOR OF CIVIL ENFORCEMENT. 

COHEN, SCOTT ............................. EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 

DRENNAN, RONALD ..................... CHIEF, COMPETITION POLICY SECTION. 

FAMILANT, NORMAN .................... CHIEF, ECONOMIC LITIGATION SECTION. 

FOUNTAIN, DOROTHY .................. SENIOR COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR OF RISK MANAGEMENT. 

GREER, TRACY ............................. ATTORNEY ADVISOR. 

HOLLAND, CAROLINE ................... CHIEF COUNSEL FOR COMPETITION POLICY AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS. 

LIMARZI, KRISTEN ........................ CHIEF, APPELLATE SECTION. 

MUCCHETTI, PETER J .................. CHIEF, LITIGATION I SECTION. 

MAJURE, WILLIAM ROBERT ........ DIRECTOR OF ECONOMICS. 

MARTINO, JEFFREY ..................... CHIEF, NEW YORK FIELD OFFICE. 

PETRIZZI, MARIBETH ................... CHIEF, LITIGATION II SECTION. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES