alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fiscal fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 8, 2010
    /s/ Andrew C. PlummerAndrew C. Plummer, Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONSOLIDATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT FOUND OF PAGES 22 AND 23 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-K FOR THIS YEAR AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          21,547
<SECURITIES>                                    16,620
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,154
<PP&E>                                           9,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,374
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,580
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,489
<SALES>                                         73,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,260
<CGS>                                           33,231
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,407
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,649
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,184
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


REQUIRED BY RULE 13A - 14(B) OR RULE 15D - 14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. 1350




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inova Technology Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report" ), I, Adam Radly, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By: /s/ Adam RadlyAdam RadlyChief Executive OfficerMarch 18, 2013
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Harvey, Appellant. The People of the State of New *109York, Respondent, v Tracy Rogers, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 139]

—Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Stack-house, J.), rendered January 12, 1995 and May 11, 1994, respectively, convicting defendants, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing each of them to consecutive terms of SVa to 7 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendants’ suppression motions were properly denied. The record supports the motion court’s finding that, based on the entire chain of events, the police officer approached the van occupied by defendants with reasonable suspicion that defendants had committed a recent gunpoint robbery and that they were armed *(see, People v Allen,*73 NY2d 378, 379-380). The officer’s subsequent plain view observation of jewelry taken during the recent robbery, of a gun holster and of bullets, all contained in an open bag in the van, provided the officer with probable cause to arrest and to search the van and the bag *(see, People v Landy,*59 NY2d 369, 376-377; *People v Sanchez,*216 AD2d 207, *lv denied*87 NY2d 850). We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations.

The court properly excluded defendant Harvey’s five-year-old child and newborn infant from the courtroom. The record sufficiently establishes that the children were actually, as well as potentially, disruptive *(see, People v Daniels,*237 AD2d 529, *lv denied*90 NY2d 857).

The trial court properly denied defendant Rogers’s request to give a circumstantial evidence charge *(see, People v Daddona,*81 NY2d 990, 992; *People v de Jesus,*178 AD2d 180, *lv denied*79 NY2d 946).

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence of defendants’ constructive possession of the bonds *(see, People v Daddona,*81 NY2d 990, *supra; People v Holley,*237 AD2d 642), and we reject defendant Rogers’s argument that the court’s charge limited the constructive possession theory to the weapon. The value of the savings bond was properly established *(see,*Penal Law § 155.20 [1], [2]; *People v Jenkins,*61 AD2d 705, *lv denied*44 NY2d 954).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

We have considered defendants’ other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.3


                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                     ---------------------------------------


         This First Amendment to Employment Agreement, entered into as of this
1st day of May, 1997, by and between GLAS-CRAFT, INC., an Indiana corporation 
(the "Company") and DWIGHT D. GOODMAN ("Employee") is to evidence the following
agreements and understandings:

                                   WITNESSETH
                                   ----------

         WHEREAS, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of
November 30, 1994 that provided, subject to certain restrictions contained in
the Employment Agreement, for Employee's term of employment to terminate on the
third anniversary of such Employment Agreement; and

         WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Employment Agreement to
provide for the term of employment of Employee to be extended for six (6) months
to May 31, 1998.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein
and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt, adequacy and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as
follows:

         1. The first sentence of Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is
hereby amended to read as follows:

                  The term of this Agreement shall commence on the effective
                  date of COHT's initial public offering and shall terminate on
                  May 31, 1998, subject to the termination provisions of
                  Sections 6 and 10 and the other provisions of this Agreement.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First
Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the day and year first written above.


                                        GLAS-CRAFT, INC.



                                        By: /s/ Robert Pawlak
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert Pawlak, Assistant Secretary



                                        /s/ Dwight D. Goodman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Dwight D. Goodman
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1994-A,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,299
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  36,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               37,608
<PP&E>                                         3,028,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,172,331)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 894,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          314,344
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     579,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   894,035
<SALES>                                        132,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,468
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  902,115<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (818,155)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (818,155)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (818,155)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40756

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SERGIO GARCIA-REYES, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:05-CR-942-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Sergio GarciaReyes raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3193 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, 

Florida, as the ‘‘Alto Lee Adams, Sr., United States 

Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3193 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States courthouse under construction at 

3 101 South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, 

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Alto Lee Adams, 

5 Sr., United States Courthouse’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Alto Lee Adams, Sr., United 

11 States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3193 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse under 

Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse’’. 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ‘‘Alto Lee construction at 101 South United States Route
#### Steven McHugh, Respondent, v Scott Oatkin et al., Appellants.

[665 NYS2d 945]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to impose *276a constructive trust upon 25% of the shares of SAS Restaurant, Inc., the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kingston, J.), dated April 23, 1996, which, after a hearing, awarded the plaintiff $16,500 for “unpaid salary”.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint is dismissed.

The evidence does not support the Supreme Court’s finding that the plaintiff was entitled to an award of “unpaid salary”. There was no clear agreement between the plaintiff and the appellants requiring the payment of salary *(cf., Epelbaum v Nefesh Achath B’Yisrael,*237 AD2d 327). Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and Lerner, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 0
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1,805
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              50
<OTHER-SE>                                        (1,855)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           0
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      2,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (2,437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (2,437)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.01<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.01


<F1><FN>
*Less than .01 per share
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PETERSON SULLIVAN P.L.L.C.
601 UNION STREET SUITE 2300 SEATTLE WA 98101 (206) 382-7777 FAX 382-7700
                            CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



                     Independent Auditors' Consent
                     -----------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (No. 333-15831 and 333-15829) on Form S-8 of Ichor Corporation
and Subsidiary of our report dated March 24, 2000, relating to the balance
sheets of Ichor Corporation and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1999 and
1998, and the related statements of operations, shareholders' equity and
cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, which
report appears in the Annual Report of Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999, of Ichor Corporation and Subsidiary.



/s/ Peterson Sullivan P.L.L.C.
March 27, 2000
Seattle, Washington
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 15, 2023

NO. 03-22-00648-CV

Debra Porter, Appellant

v.

Gale Miller Barnes; Sheri Miller; Renee Hawkins; Marcus Hawkins;

Alyce Hilton Johnson; Clyde Hilton; Demotrios Hilton; Howard Phearse;

Keino Remi Phearse; Kay Phearse; Al Gene Hogg; Donny Hogg; Joslyn Hogg;

Roslyn Hogg; Lonnie Houston; Jamar Houston; Tavares Houston;

Winifred Thorns Gilden; Andra Blake; James Thorns; Murray Lee Thorns;

Abner Thorns; Nathaniel Thorns; Joseph Thorns; Joy Fay Janie Thorns; Willis A. Bolden;

Unknown Heirs of Charlotte Houston, deceased; Unknown Heirs of Jessie Thorns, 

deceased; Unknown Heirs of Charlie Thorns, deceased; Unknown Heirs of 

Susan McDowell, deceased; and Curtis Capps, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

Having reviewed the record, the Court holds that Debra Porter has not prosecuted her appeal and 

did not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the 

appeal for want of prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in 

this Court and in the court below.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, David C. Nolan, is the Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant). This statement is
being furnished in connection with the filing by the Registrant of the
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
(the Report).

By
execution of this statement, I certify that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                           
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | A) | the Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d); and       
| |    |                                                                                                                                                           
| | B) | the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Registrant.

This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that
this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request

|                      |                                                                       
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August
 6, 2009 | /s/ David C.
 Nolan                                                   
|                      |                                                                       
|                      | David C.
 Nolan 
 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 29, 2019

NO. 03-18-00124-CR

Ex parte Vester Saylee

APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order denying habeas-corpus relief entered by the trial court. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s order denying habeas-corpus relief. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s order denying habeas-corpus relief. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this 

appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
#### Margaret Lazzaro, Respondent, v County of Nassau et al., Appellants.

[665 NYS2d 441]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for negligence, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated November 14, 1996, which denied their motion to dismiss the first cause of action sounding in medical malpractice.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, *343the defendants’ motion is granted, and the first cause of action is dismissed.

Although one other than a ‘licensed physician” may be liable for medical malpractice *(see, Bleiler v Bodnar,*65 NY2d 65), the laws of New York do not contemplate that an individual who is trained in first aid techniques, but is not a member of the medical profession, be subject to suit for medical malpractice *(see, e.g.,*Insurance Law §§ 5501, 5506). Accordingly, here, the plaintiffs medical malpractice cause of action, which arose out of the defendant police officer’s allegedly improper performance of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation, must be dismissed. Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.