alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bruce A. Hall, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of RG America, Inc.(the
"Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's independent registered public accounting firm and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting. November 15, 2004

/s/ Bruce A. Hall
-----------------
Bruce A. Hall
Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND ON PAGES 1 AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,110,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 10,070,708
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,344,959
<PP&E>                                       6,021,181
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,733,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,118,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,402,856
<BONDS>                                      4,745,133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,336
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,946,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,118,564
<SALES>                                      7,598,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,598,656
<CGS>                                        2,945,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,245,728
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             214,078
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (849,284)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (849,284)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (849,284)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22061]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. A copy of the agreement is 
available through the Commission's Web site (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87f3f5e6e3e2e6e9e6ebfef4eef4c7e1eae4a9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="245056454041454a45485d574d57644249470a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 201227-005.
    Title: Pacific Ports Operational Improvements Agreement.
    Parties: Ocean Carrier Equipment Management Association, Inc., FMC 
Agreement No. 011284; West Coast MTO Agreement, FMC Agreement No. 
201143; Maersk Line A/S; CMA CGM S.A., APL Co. Pte Ltd., and American 
President Lines, Ltd. (acting as a single party); COSCO SHIPPING Lines 
Co., Ltd.; Evergreen Line Joint Service Agreement, FMC Agreement No. 
011982; Hamburg-Sud and Alianca Navegacao e Logistica Ltda. (acting as 
a single party); Hapag-Lloyd AG, Hapag-Lloyd USA, Companhia Libra de 
Navegacao, and Compania Libra de Navegacion Uruguay S.A. (acting as a 
single party); Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; Nippon Yusen Kaisha Line; 
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.; Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.; Zim 
Integrated Shipping Services; MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company SA; 
Matson Navigation Company, Inc.; APM Terminals Pacific, Ltd.; Eagle 
Marine Services, Ltd.; International Transportation Service, Inc.; LBCT 
LLC; Everport Terminal Services, Inc.; Total Terminals International 
LLC; West Basin Container Terminal LLC; Pacific Maritime Services, 
L.L.C.; SSA Terminal (Long Beach), LLC; Trapac Inc.; Yusen Terminals, 
Inc.; SSA Terminals, LLC; SSA Terminals (Oakland), LLC; SSA Terminals 
(Seattle), LLC; Sea Star Stevedoring Company, Inc.; Washington United 
Terminals, Inc.
    Filing Party: Donald J. Kassilke, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1200 19th 
Street NW; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The Amendment makes several updates to the membership of 
the Agreement.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: October 6, 2017.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-22061 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Steven E. West, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunterra Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control of financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



a. all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control of financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and



b. Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ STEVEN E. WEST     
|Steven E. West         
|Chief Financial Officer
|Dated: August 9, 2005
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DACOBY RESHARD WOOTEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3457

[July 1, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Cheryl A. Caracuzzo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2015-CF011635-AXXX-WB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. Hernandez, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-2558

___________

Curtis James Neeley, Jr., MFA, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

NameMedia, Inc., *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Network Solutions, * Western District of Arkansas.

*

Defendant, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Google, Inc., *

*

Appellee. *

*

---------------- *

*

NameMedia, Inc., *

*

Counter Claimant, *

*

v. *

*

Curtis James Neeley, Jr., MFA, *

*

Counter Defendant. *

___________
Submitted: February 3, 2012

Filed: February 15, 2012

___________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Following the adverse resolution of his civil action, Curtis Neeley appeals the

district court’s dismissal of certain claims, and the court’s refusal to allow

1

amendment of his complaint. Upon careful review, we conclude that dismissal of his

17 U.S.C. § 106A claims was proper for the reasons stated by the district court in its

June 7, 2011 order denying Neeley’s motion for reconsideration. We also conclude

that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying Neeley further leave to amend

after he filed a second amended complaint, asthe proposed amendments he highlights

on appeal would have been futile. See Dennis v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 207 F.3d

523, 525 (8th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable JimmLarry Hendren, Chief Judge,UnitedStatesDistrictCourt

1

for the Western District of Arkansas.

-2-
Exhibit
4.29
 (SIMS METAL MANAGEMENT LOGO)
    
    Suite 4, 20 Clifford Street 
Mosman NSW 2088
Australia P.O. Box 947
Spit Junction NSW 2088
    
    Telephone 612 9902 6002
Facsimile: 612 9902 6006
info@simsmm.com
www.simsmm.com
  
   1.
    
    This letter is to be read in conjunction with your employment agreement with Metal
Management Inc dated July 26, 2007 (the Employment Agreement), as modified and amended by
the letter from Sims Metal Management Limited (formerly Sims Group Limited) (SimsMM) dated
September 24, 2007, and the Code Section 409A Amendment dated on or around December 19,
2008.2.
    
    Your base compensation (Base) will increase to USD 1,250,000 to be effective from
January 1, 2009 when you assumed full global responsibility for SimsMM (with a catch-up
payment to be made in the next payroll run); for 2010 Fiscal Year remuneration, your STI
will increase to a target of 130% of Base with a threshold of 65% and a maximum of 260%;
your LTI will increase to 300% of Base and be allocated as to 100% in Options and 200% in
Performance Rights (with re-testing). The applicable SimsMM STI and LTI Plans are those
approved by the Remuneration Committee from time to time for Company senior executives.3.
    
    Your new remuneration package provides the basis for calculating other benefits (if
any) under your Employment Agreement including termination benefits.4.
    
    The next review of your total compensation package and its elements will occur so as
to commence and be effective from July 1, 2010. Although we have only recently established
a new peer group of companies for the purpose of benching the CEOs remuneration, the
Remuneration Committee will subject that peer group and the resultant benchmarking to a
review to ensure that the membership of the peer group is still appropriate. That review
would commence no later than beginning of the fourth quarter of the 2010 fiscal year.Please note that any review of your remuneration must comply with the then applicable
Australian and US laws, relevant listing rules and guidelines and shall
take account of best practices as advised to us by our retained remuneration consultants.




---



##### 



5.
    
    Your Employment Agreement expires in March 2012. Subject to your continued employment
we will commence discussion with you of a new contract before the expiry of the existing
one in order for the term of the contract to be consistent with the Sims MM fiscal
periods, that is, to aim to be in effect from no later than the beginning of fiscal 2012.
We would thus envisage commencing discussions with you no later than the beginning of the
second quarter of fiscal 2011.6.
    
    Except as may be modified by this letter and the September 24, 2007 letter and the
Code Section 409A Amendment dated on or around December 19, 2008, all the terms of your
Employment Agreement remain unamended. You and SimsMM will bear your and its own costs in
this matter.
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

CASTE TROSCLAIR VERSUS JONATHAN ST. MARTIN, CHRISTOPHER ST. MARTIN, 

### STATE FARMAUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., ANDABC INSURANCE CO, NO. 

### 2023 CW 0520

JULY28, 2023

In Re: Casie Trosclair and Drake Troclair, applying for

supervisory writs, 17th Judicial District Court, 

### Parish of Lafourche, No. 140756.
BEFORE: HOLDRIDGE, CHUTZ, AND PENZATO, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED IN PART; DENIED IN PART. 

### The portion of the trial court's March 28, 

## 2023judgmentdenyingplaintiffs' motion 

### to compel State FarmMutualAutomobile 

## InsuranceCompany (" State Farm") to provide a full and complete response to plaintiffs' 

## Interrogatory No. 13 is reversed. The 

### information sought 

## by plaintiffs in 

## Interrogatory No. 13, a list of cases in which State Farm has retained Dr. Cenac as an additional medical expert in the last five years, is relevant to 

### demonstrate potential bias on the part of Dr. Cenac 

### or possibly to lead to other admissible evidence. La. Code Civ. P. art. 1422. 

## Accordingly, plaintiffs' 

### motion to compel is granted in part and State Farm is 

### ordered to provide plaintiffs a list of cases in 

### which State Farm has retained Dr. Cenac as an additional medical expert 

### in the last 

### five years. The writ 

### is denied in all other respects. GH WRC ARP



### COURTOFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



### DEPUTYCLERKOFCOURT FORTHE COURT
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3224 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to plan, design, and construct a vehicle maintenance building at the vehicle maintenance branch of the 

Smithsonian Institution located in Suitland, Maryland, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3224 EH

1 SECTION 1. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING, SUITLAND, 

2 MARYLAND. 

3 (a) AUTHORITY TO PLAN, DESIGN, AND CON4 STRUCT.—The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Insti5 tution is authorized to plan, design, and construct a vehi6 cle maintenance building at the vehicle maintenance 

7 branch of the Smithsonian Institution located in Suitland, 

8 Maryland. 

9 (b) PURPOSE OF BUILDING.—The purpose of the 

10 building shall be to provide a facility to be used for hous11 ing, maintaining, and repairing vehicles and transpor12 tation equipment of the Smithsonian Institution. 

13 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

14 There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

15 this Act $4,000,000 for fiscal year 2010. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3224 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsoposes. cated in Suitland, Maryland, and for other pur- tenance branch of the Smithsonian Institution lo- vehicle maintenance building at the vehicle main- nian Institution to plan, design, and construct a
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of G/O Business Solutions, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Brian E. Rodriguez, President, Treasurer and director of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.      Date:  April 9, 2009By:/s/ Brian E. RodriguezBrian E. Rodriguez, President, Treasurer, and Director
#### THE FLORIDA. HILLS et al. v. THE FLORIDA.

(District Court, E. D. New York.

May 27, 1895.)

Shipping—Damage to Cargo—Negligence in Discharging.

A steamship *held*liable for damage where bags of filberts, in the course of discharging, were placed so near the coal bunkers that dust from the ' coal blew upon and through the bags.

This was a libel by John Hills and others against the steamship Florida to recover for damage to certain bags of filberts, constituting part of her cargo.

Carpenter & Park, for libelants.

Convers & Kirlin, for claimants.

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This is an action to recover of the steamship Florida for alleged damage to 383 bags of filberts, caused by coal dust upon the filberts. These filberts were part of a consignment shipped from the port of Messina on board the steamship Florida, which arrived in New York about August 5, 1890. Upon their discharge on the dock a large number of the bags were found to be covered with coal dust, and considerably damaged thereby. The allegation of the libel is that the cargo in question was damaged by coal dust from the bunkers of the ship permeating said bags, and damaging their contents, and that the same was caused by negligence and improper attention on the part of the master of the vessel, Ms agents and servants. Although some point has been made upon the testimony as to the sufficiency of the evidence to show that the filberts in question came by the steamship Florida, the testimony, taken together, leaves no doubt on that point; and it is found that the filberts were transported in the steamship Florida, and that they were damaged by the coal dust, as alleged in the libel. It is (rue that the evidence shows good stowage of the filberts on board the *160ship, and makes it plain that no coal dust from the hunkers could have reached them while so stowed; but this fact, taken with the fact that the filberts, when landed, were covered with coal dust, would warrant the inference that the filberts were permitted to come in contact with coal dust while discharging. But the case is not left to depend upon this inference. There is positive proof in the case that the filberts, while discharging, were placed by the bunkers of the ship where the coal was put down, and that coal dust blew right through the bags of filberts. It must therefore be found that the filberts were damaged by negligence on the part of the ship. For such negligence as this the ship is not absolved by the terms of the bill of lading, under the law of this country. Let there be a decree for the libelants, with an order of reference to ascertain the amount.
|  Subsidiaries (a)         | Percentageof Ownership | Jurisdiction      orState of Incorporation |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                           |                   |                                       |
| Cascade      Bank              | 100%                   | Washington                                 |
| Cascade      Capital Trust I   | 100%                   | Delaware                                   |
| Cascade      Capital Trust II  | 100%                   | Delaware                                   |
| Cascade      Capital Trust III | 100%                   | Delaware                                   |

| (a) | The      operation of the Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiaries are included in      the Corporation’s Financial Statements contained in the Annual Report      attached hereto as Exhibit13. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|