alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22416]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP18-22-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Leach XPress Implementation, CP15-
514 to be effective 11/6/2017.
    Filed Date: 10/6/17.
    Accession Number: 20171006-5054.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-23-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Petition for Limited Tariff Waiver Due of Iroquois Gas 
Transmission System, L.P.
    Filed Date: 10/6/17.
    Accession Number: 20171006-5084.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-24-000.
    Applicants: Viking Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Update Non-Conforming 
Agreements--November 2017 to be effective 11/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 10/6/17.
    Accession Number: 20171006-5126.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-25-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated & Non-Conforming 
Service Agreements--LXP to be effective 11/6/2017.
    Filed Date: 10/6/17.
    Accession Number: 20171006-5138.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-26-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Questar Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: QPC Tariff Part 1 ? 5 Revision 
to be effective 12/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 10/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20171010-5022.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/23/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on or 
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests 
may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to 
the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: October 10, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-22416 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Form of Series A Preferred Stock Option Letter



 EXHIBIT 10.4 
  
 [AVICENA LETTERHEAD] 
  
 [ADDRESS BLOCK] 
 April 4, 2007 
 Dear Sirs: 
 In consideration of the consent of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) of Avicena Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”) to amend the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Convertible Stock
(“Certificate of Designation”), the Corporation hereby grants to you, as a holder of Series A Preferred Stock, the option to convert your shares of Series A Preferred Stock and the accompanying Warrant to purchase Common Stock
(“Series A Warrant”) into shares of the Corporation’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and a warrant to purchase Common Stock granted therewith (“Series B Warrant”) on a one-for-one basis (the “Option”).

 The Option will only become effective upon the sale by the Corporation of at least 400,000 shares of the Series B Convertible Stock on or
prior to March 30, 2007, and must be exercised by you, in whole or in part, on or prior to April 30, 2007. In order to exercise the Option, you must deliver to the Corporation written notice of your election to exercise the Option, which
notice will specify the number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock and pro rata Series A Warrant with respect to which the Option is being exercised together with the certificate representing your shares of Series A Preferred Stock and the Series
A Warrant and a signed copy of the Securities Purchase Agreement regarding the Series B Convertible Stock, a copy of which will be provided to you by the Corporation upon request. Upon receipt of these documents, the Corporation shall promptly cause
to be issued to you a certificate representing the shares of Series B Convertible Stock and a Series B Warrant as set forth in the Securities Purchase Agreement and, if your exercise is not for your entire holdings of Series A Preferred Stock and
the entire Series A Warrant, a certificate for the balance of the share of Series A Preferred Stock and a Series A Warrant representing the portion not converted, which shares and Series A Warrant will remain subject to the same terms and conditions
as currently exist with respect to such shares and Series A Warrant. 
  
  

			
	AVICENA GROUP, INC.
		
	By:	 	  










			
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED
	
	  
	Print Name
	
	  
	Signature
	
	  
	Print Name of Signatory

  
 Date:                                     
                       , 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, November 07, 2017, 2:00 p.m. to November 08, 2017, 6:00 p.m., Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, Montgomery County Conference Center Facility, 5701 Marinelli Road, North Bethesda, MD, 20852 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 22, 2017, 82 FR 44430.                

This meeting notice is amended to change the meeting location to the DoubleTree Hotel Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: September 29, 2017.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-21387 Filed 10-4-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1512

In re: FREDERICK J. ANDREWS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:17-cv-00533-REP)

Submitted: June 21, 2018 Decided: June 25, 2018

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick J. Andrews, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Frederick J. Andrews petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court 

has unduly delayed acting on the civil action that he initiated in August 2017. He seeks an 

order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s 

docket reveals that the court recently granted defendants’ motions to dismiss, dismissed 

the parties that Andrews failed to serve, and dismissed without prejudice his amended 

complaint. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Andrews’ case, we 

deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3977

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Kenneth David Porter, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 4, 1999 Filed: June 14, 1999

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BRIGHT, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Kenneth David Porter was previously sentenced to a total of forty-eight months imprisonment

and four years supervised release for aiding and abetting the distribution of 6.773 grams of cocaine base. While serving his supervised release, he admitted to violating several supervised release conditions--including testing positive three times for marijuana use, failing to submit to urinalysis testing on four occasions, and failing to report to an outpatient drug aftercare program for more than thirty days, resulting in1 The Honorable Garnett Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- his termination from that program. The district court 1 revoked Porter’s supervised release and ordered him to serve ten months imprisonment and, upon his release from impriso nment, to complete the remainder of his original term of supervised release through the original supervisedrelease termination date. Porter appeals, challenging the reimposition of supervised release and the district court’s refusal to grant his request for lenience by continuing him on supervised release. We affirm. Based on the drug offense that resulted in his original term of supervised release, Porter was subject to up to three years imprisonment upon revocation of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(iii); 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(2). Because the ten-month prison sentence Porter received was less than the maximum authorized, the district court was entitled to impose additional supervised release so long as the imprisonment and additional supervised release did not exceed Porter’s original term of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h); United States v. St. John , 92 F.3d 761, 766 (8th Cir. 1996). The revocation sentence was proper because it did not exceed Porter’s original four-year term of supervised release, and his argument on appeal thus fails.
We further reject Porter’s contention that the district court erred by refusing to show lenience, because Porter’s supervised release violations included failure to submit urine specimens on four occasions, as well as failure to attend his drug treatment program. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g)(3) (court shall revoke term of supervised release and impose term of imprisonment if defendant refuses to comply with drug testing imposed as condition of supervised release); United States v. Stephens , 65 F.3d 738, 741 (8th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we affirm.-3-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 10-20301 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. MIGUEL ZAMORA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-400-2
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Miguel Zamora has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. C a l i f o r n i a , 386 U

. S

. 7 3 8 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 2 29 (5th Cir. 2011). Zamora has f

iled a response. To the extent t h a t Z a m o r a raises claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, the record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration o f his claims at this time; such claims genera lly “ cannot be resolved on direct a p p e a l when the claim[s] h a[ve] not been raised before the U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D October 9, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 10-20301 Document: 00512401644 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/09/2013No. 10-20301

district court since no opportunity existed to develop t he record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 ( 5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and c i t a t ion omitted). W e have reviewed c ounsel’s brief and the rele v ant portions of the r e cord reflected therein, as well as Zamora’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal pr e s e n t s no n onfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, c ounsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused f rom further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS D ISMISSED. S ee 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-20301 Document: 00512401644 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/09/2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Reclamation

          - [RR04073000, XXXR4081X3, RX.05940913.7000000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal.

# SUMMARY:

Following consultation with the General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) is renewing the charter for the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group. The purpose of the Adaptive Management Work Group is to provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary concerning the operation of Glen Canyon Dam and the exercise of other authorities pursuant to applicable Federal law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Linda Whetton, 801-524-3880,                         *lwhetton@usbr.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended). The certification of renewal is published below.

## Certification

I hereby certify that Charter renewal of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Department of the Interior.

Ryan K. Zinke,

Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 2017-21091 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4332-90-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

LEWIS P. HANNAH, III,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2666 Disciplinary Board No. 3

No. 53 DB 2019

Attorney Registration No. 57247

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26 th day of November , 2019, upon consideration of the

Recommendation of the Three

- Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint Petition

in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted, and Lewis P. Hannah, III is suspended on

consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years. He shall comply

with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See

Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           9,996                   6,238
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,311                   9,475
<ALLOWANCES>                                       468                     467
<INVENTORY>                                      6,414                   5,943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,316                  23,087
<PP&E>                                          21,808                  19,320
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,547                   5,836
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,049                  44,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,291                  12,326
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        20,014                  19,917
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,049                  44,243
<SALES>                                         70,204                  60,495
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,204                  60,495
<CGS>                                           45,279                  38,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,279                  38,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 170                   1,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,579                   6,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,676                   2,673
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,903                   4,275
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,903                   4,275
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.87                    0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.85                    0.96
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Douglas K. Beplate, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Emergency Filtration Products,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2005

/s/Douglas K. Beplate
Douglas K. Beplate, Principal Executive Officer