alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         October 18, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 13, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 59 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-11, CP2018-18.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-22586 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Darrin Keith Wilson, * From the 91st District Court

of Eastland County,

Trial Court No. 24575.

Vs. No. 11-19-00058-CR * March 7, 2019

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Bailey, C.J., and Willson, J., 

not participating)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance 

with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOHN ROMAGNOLO,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 458 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
                                                                    ------------



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                                        


The Board of Directors
U.S. Foodservice:



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-3 (333-597850) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-88140, 33-88142, 33-
88144, 33-88146, 33-81011, 333-37359, 333-43185 and 333-47759) of U.S.
Foodservice of our report, dated August 14, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of U.S. Foodservice and Subsidiaries as of June 28,
1997 and June 27, 1998 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, cash flows and schedules for each of the years then ended,
which report appears in the Form 10-K for the year ended June 27, 1998.



KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Baltimore, Maryland
September 22, 1998
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129638 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129638 

 COA: 260129 

Kent CC: 00-005604-FC 

HAROLD JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2960 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2960

 To authorize the Secretary of Defense to pay an additional amount of 
  assignment special pay to members of the Armed Forces who agree to 
serve in Afghanistan for up to six years or the duration of the United 
                    States mission in that country.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2009

  Mr. Kirk (for himself and Mr. Larsen of Washington) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of Defense to pay an additional amount of 
  assignment special pay to members of the Armed Forces who agree to 
serve in Afghanistan for up to six years or the duration of the United 
                    States mission in that country.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL ASSIGNMENT PAY FOR MEMBERS AGREEING TO SERVE IN 
              AFGHANISTAN FOR THE DURATION OF THE UNITED STATES 
              MISSION.

    (a) Additional Assignment Pay Authorized.--Notwithstanding the 
limitations specified in subsection (b) of section 352 of title 37, 
United States Code, on the maximum amount of assignment or special duty 
pay that may be paid to a member of the Armed Forces under such 
section, the Secretary of Defense may authorize the payment of 
assignment pay in the total amount of $250,000 to a member who agrees 
to serve on active duty in Afghanistan for six years or the duration of 
the United States mission in Afghanistan, whichever occurs first. The 
assignment period required by the agreement shall provide for 
reasonable periods of leave.
    (b) Increased Amounts for Members Fluent in Certain Languages.--If 
a member described in subsection (a) scores a 4.0 on the Foreign 
Service Institute test for the dominant languages of Pashto and Dari, 
the maximum amount of the assignment pay may be $500,000.
                                 <all>
```
```

[United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions (Plum Book), 1996]
[Independent Agencies and Government Corporations]
[Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

The Plum Book (United States Government Policy
        and Supporting Positions): 1996 EditionBRANCH: EXECUTIVE FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICELocationPosition TitleName of IncumbentPay PlanType of Appt.Level Grade or PayTenureExpires**OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR**Washington, DCDirectorJohn C. WellsEXPASIII..................Washington, DCSpecial AssistantVella M. TraynhamGSSC15..................Washington, DCNational RepresentativeBrian L. FloresESCA............................Washington, DCPublic Affairs DirectorDavid L. HelfertGSSC15..................Washington, DCDeputy Director for National Office OperationsWilma LiebmanESNA............................Washington, DCDeputy Director for Field Operations VacantESCA............................
```
Exhibit Number 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great Western Bancorporation, Inc. (Great Western) on Form 10-Q for the six month period ended December 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James R. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of Great Western, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Great Western.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: January 31, 2006 |  | /s/ James R. Clark     
|                       |  | James R. Clark         
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer



23
[No. 28899-4-III.

Division Three.

October 25, 2012.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Earth Feather Quintero, *Appellant,*and David Quintero, Sr., *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. Q3-3-02757-8, Gregory D. Sypolt, J., entered February 26, 2010. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Sweeney, J.,

concurred in by Korsmo, C.J., and Siddoway, J.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 

20, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00354-CV

IN RE ALI CHOUDHRI, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-27197A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Monday, May 20, 2024, relator Ali Choudhri filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Missy 

Medary, visiting judge of the 333rd District Court of Harris County, to (1) vacate 

her May 2, 2024 order resetting a hearing on relator’s motion for disqualification 
2

or recusal to Zoom on May 20, 2024 at 3 p.m. and (2) direct the trial court to 

schedule the hearing to be in person.

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot and Zimmerer.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 18, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 48394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22525]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2015-6359; Special Conditions No. 25-633-SC]


Special Conditions: Bombardier Inc. Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-700-
2A13 Airplanes; Airplane Electronic-System Security Protection From 
Unauthorized Internal Access

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects an error that appeared in Docket No. 
FAA-2015-6359, Special Conditions No. 25-633-SC, which was published in 
the Federal Register on August 22, 2016. The error is an incorrect word 
in the title of the final special conditions document.

DATES: The effective date of this correction is October 18, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Varun Khanna, FAA, Airplane and Flight 
Crew Interface, AIR-671, Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind 
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1298; 
facsimile 425-227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 22, 2016, the Federal Register published a document 
designated as Docket No. FAA-2015-6359, Final Special Conditions No. 
25-633-SC (81 FR 56474). The document issued special conditions 
pertaining to system security to protect against unauthorized access to 
digital systems architecture composed of several connected data 
networks that will have the capability to allow connectivity of the 
passenger-service computer systems to the airplane critical systems and 
data networks. As published, the document contained an error in the 
title of the special conditions document, stating ``Authorized'' where 
``Unauthorized'' is correct.

Correction

    In the final special conditions document (FR Doc. 2016-19994), 
published on August 22, 2016 (81 FR 56474), make the following 
correction.
    On page 56474, first column, the special conditions title is 
corrected to read:
    Special Conditions: Bombardier Inc. Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-700-
2A13 Airplanes; Airplane Electronic-System Security Protection from 
Unauthorized Internal Access

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 12, 2017.
Victor Wicklund,
Manager, Transport Standards Branch, Policy and Innovation Division, 
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-22525 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Exhibit
      32.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Quick-Med Technologies, Inc. ("the Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, David S. Lerner,
      President and Principal Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Dated: May
      12, 2006





/s/
      David S. Lerner


David
      S.
      Lerner


President
      and Principal Executive Officer
DM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0413

CITY OF MISSOULA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

AARON DEAN STARR,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including November 23, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 15 2020

09/15/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0413
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

ERI C FL ORES, Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

. § § § § § § No. 08-09-00273- CR

Appea l from the 243rd District Court of El Paso County , Texas (TC# 20090D03111)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Eric Flore s, pro se , filed notice of appea l to challeng e the trial court’s denial of his “motion for rele vancy of evidenc e.” We do not have jurisdiction to rev i ew t his interlocutory order

. See
T E X .C O D E C R I M .P R O C .AN N
. art. 44.02 (Ve rnon 2006)(“ [a] defe ndant in any criminal action has the rig ht of appeal under

the rules here inafter presc ribed” ); T E X .R.A P P .P. 25.2(a) (2)( a defenda nt “has the rig ht of appea l under Code of Criminal Procedur e article 44.02 and these rules” in ever y case in which the trial court “ente rs a judgme nt of g uilt or other appea lable order ”). We the ref ore dismiss the appe al.

J anuar y 6, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, J ustice Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

. (Do Not Publish)
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10710

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jason Wade Grant, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:22-CR-105-11

______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit Judges. 

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jason Wade Grant has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Grant has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow 

us to make a fair evaluation of Grant’s claims of ineffective assistance of 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 5, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10710 Document: 42-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/05/2024
No. 23-10710

2

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Grant’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-10710 Document: 42-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/05/2024
#### Emma Elizabeth CASTRO-SANCHEZ, a.k.a. Emma Elizabeth Campos Mejia; Manuel De Jesus Castro-Sanchez, a.k.a. Jose Rafael Campos Mejia; Wendy Claribel Caceres-Salinas, a.k.a. Wendy Claribel Campos Mejia, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Respondent.

No. 08-71662.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 14, 2011.

Emma Elizabeth Castro-Sanchez, pro se.

Manuel De Jesus Castro-Sanchez, pro se.

Wendy Claribel Caceres-Salinas, pro se.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Mark Christopher Walters, Esquire, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

*717Emma Elizabeth Castro-Sanchez, Manuel de Jesus Castro-Sanchez, and Wendy Claribel Caceres-Salinas, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for asylum and "withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings. *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 & n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that petitioners failed to demonstrate the harm they suffered from gang members or from their uncle was on account of a protected ground. *See Gormley v. Ashcroft,*364 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.2004). We do not reach petitioners’ contentions that they were harmed on account of an imputed political opinion or that they are members of a particular social group based on their family ties because these distinct claims were not presented to the agency. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004). Substantial evidence also supports the finding that petitioners do not have a well-founded fear of future persecution because they can reasonably relocate within El Salvador. *See Kaiser v. Ashcroft,*390 F.3d 653, 659 (9th Cir.2004) (when there is no past persecution, petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that relocation is unreasonable); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(3)(i). Accordingly, petitioners’ asylum claims fail.

Because petitioners failed to meet the lower burden of proof for asylum, it follows that they have not met the higher standard for withholding of removal. *See Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2006). Accordingly, petitioners’ withholding of removal claims also fail.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.**
**4**

| (1)    | the                Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended                December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934                (15                U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                            |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |

|  Dated:              March 3,              2006 |  /s/                Thomas B. Specketer |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                      | Thomas                B. Specketer           |   |
|                                                      | Vice                President and Controller |   |
|                                                      | (chief                financial officer)     |   |

----