alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 27

                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0001088204
<NAME>              TRIWEST MANAGEMENT RESOURCES CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                          US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,000
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             50
<OTHER-SE>                                       17,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    (2,000)
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Metallica
Resources Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.

Date: May 5, 2003

/s/ Bradley J. Blacketor
-------------------------------------
Bradley J. Blacketor
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 10.64
 
  
  Re: Consultancy Agreement
 Technical Advisor to the CEO
 1.
    
    You will be engaged as an independent consultant and therefore will not be eligible for
any benefits generally offered to employees of the Company;2.
    
    You are expected to devote no less than 15 days per month of your time to the Companys
business;3.
    
    You will be paid a consultancy fee of US$850 per Day for time spent on the Companys
business, including travel time. Fees are billable in half-Day increments. For the
purposes of this agreement, a Day is defined as no less than 8 hours and no more than 10
hours of work within a twenty-four hour period. Invoices received by the Company by the
25th day of the month will be processed and paid before the 10th day
of the following month;4.
    
    All expenses related to the business or affairs of the Company for which you claim
reimbursement must be approved by the CEO. The Company will reimburse you for all
reasonable expenses you incurred on behalf of the Company upon the production of the
necessary vouchers and other supporting documentation;5.
    
    You will provide a monthly summary of your activities to the CEO no later than the
10th day of the following month;6.
    
    You agree to sign the Companys Confidential Information and Inventions Agreement
attached to this agreement and material thereto;7.
    
    Your duties and responsibilities will be those assigned to you from time to time by the
CEO, but initially will be to examine, in detail, the operation of the Windsor Desalination
Plant in Nassau, Bahamas and to make recommendations to improve the performance and
operation of that Plant.




---



##### 



/s/ Wilmer Pergande
    
    January 5, 2006Signature
    
    Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1996 FOR SUBURBAN
OSTOMY SUPPLY COMPANY INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              SEP-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                       7,113,532
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,210,987
<ALLOWANCES>                                   427,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,184,128
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,052,858
<PP&E>                                       2,049,022
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,000,835
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,254,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,331,213
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    46,177,324
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,337,926)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,254,970
<SALES>                                     21,962,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,962,844
<CGS>                                       16,844,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,797,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               239,485
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             414,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,740,654
<INCOME-TAX>                                   769,431
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   971,223
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      31




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




I,
      Gary
      Herman, certify that:





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Creative Development Corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007
      (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
                October 29, 2007/s/ Gary
                HermanGary
                HermanPresident
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intermost Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andy
Lin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                         /s/ Andy Lin
                                         ---------------------------
                                         Andy Lin
                                         Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer


February 12, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jefferey GRUBBS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-10311.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 7, 2008.

Camil A. Skipper, USSC-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mark J. Reichel, Esq., Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: B. FLETCHER and STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and JANE A. RESTANI,* Judge.

*

 The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

ORDER

The order for publication filed on December 27, 2007 is hereby withdrawn. The panel will take the remaining issues on appeal under consideration. The parties will be notified if supplemental briefing or additional oral argument is required.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 15, 2017

No. 04-16-00808-CV

PERIDOT JOINT VENTURE, Millennium Exploration Company, LLC and Richard Monroy,

Appellants

v.

RPH CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-17142

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On June 23, 2016, appellee filed an “Opposed Motion to Dismiss Restricted Appeal as 

Moot, or in the Alternative, Unopposed Motion to Abate Restricted Appeal.” In the motion, 

appellee advises this court that “[t]he fundamental issue at the heart of the Restricted Appeal and 

Mandamus Proceeding is whether the Trial Court’s December 2015 Default Judgment is valid 

and enforceable,” and it “intends to file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in the Texas Supreme 

Court,” which may potentially restore the December 2015 default judgment . We further note 

that on August 25, 2017, a petition for writ of mandamus has been filed in the Texas Supreme 

Court. 

Based on the foregoing, we GRANT the agreed motion to abate and ORDER this appeal 

abated pending final resolution of any action relating to Cause No. 04-16-00424-CV, In re RPH 

Capital Partners, LP, including appellant’s filing of a petition for writ of mandamus. We further 

ORDER the parties to notify this court when the resolution of the pending petition is finally 

resolved. 

All other deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of September, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift
Energy Pension Partners 1994-A, Ltd's balance sheet and statement of operations
contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                         19,720
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  25,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               45,585
<PP&E>                                         1,743,955
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,336,236)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 453,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,243
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     441,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   453,304
<SALES>                                        94,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               311,371
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  43,857<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                211,529
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            211,529
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   211,529
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0

<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation and
amortization expense. Excludes general and administrative and interest expense.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Admore, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 30]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaTorella, J.), rendered March 15, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that he sold cocaine to an undercover officer is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s *459guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). '

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Altman, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3137 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide clarification relating 

to the authority of the United States Postal Service to accept donations 

as an additional source of funding for commemorative plaques. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2009 

Mr. ISSA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide clarification relating to the authority of the United States Postal 

Service to accept donations as an additional source of 

funding for commemorative plaques. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DONATIONS FOR COMMEMORATIVE PLAQUES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 401(7) of title 39, United 

5 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘business;’’ and in6 serting ‘‘business, including monetary donations made (in 

7 such manner as the Postal Service may prescribe) for the 


jbell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3137 IH

1 funding of plaques in connection with the commemorative 

2 designation of postal facilities;’’. 

3 (b) DESIGNATIONS.—The donor of a monetary dona4 tion described in the amendment made by subsection (a) 

5 may specify the postal facility with respect to which such 

6 donation is to be used. 

7 (c) REQUIREMENT.—The United States Postal Serv8 ice shall provide for a suitable plaque, in the case of any 

9 postal facility which has been designated by law to com10 memorate a particular individual, no later than 120 days 

11 after the date as of which— 

12 (1) a law has been enacted providing for the 

13 designation of the postal facility involved; and 

14 (2) sufficient amounts have been received, in 

15 the manner described in subsection (b), to provide 

16 for such plaque. 

17 Any donations received by the Postal Service under sub18 section (b) in excess of the total amount needed in order 

19 to provide for a suitable plaque may, with the consent of 

20 the donors involved, be used for the funding of a plaque 

21 in the case of any other postal facility as to which a law 

22 (as described in paragraph (1)) has been enacted. 

23 (d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec24 tion shall be considered— 


jbell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3137 IH

1 (1) to affect the authority of the United States 

2 Postal Service with respect to any requirements con3 cerning the design, placement, and limitation on 

4 costs relating to commemorative plaques (as de5 scribed in the preceding provisions of this section), 

6 so long as such requirements are applied in a uni7 form manner; or 

8 (2) to limit, supersede, or render inapplicable 

9 any other authority or duty which (but for this Act) 

10 the United States Postal Service would otherwise 

11 have had with respect to the commemorative des12 ignation of a facility or the funding, commissioning, 

13 or installation of a plaque in connection with such 

14 a designation. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3182 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3182

               For the relief of Hotaru Nakama Ferschke.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2009

  Mr. Duncan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Hotaru Nakama Ferschke.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR HOTARU NAKAMA FERSCHKE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Hotaru Nakama Ferschke 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Hotaru Nakama Ferschke enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Hotaru Nakama Ferschke, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Hotaru Nakama 
Ferschke shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```