alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| (1)    | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended      December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

| Dated:  March      1, 2010 | /s/ Thomas B.      Specketer       |   |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 | Thomas      B. Specketer           |   |
|                                 | Vice      President and Controller |   |
|                                 | (principal      financial officer) |   |

----

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LOTTOWORLD,  INC. FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS  ENDED  DECEMBER
1996,  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             138 
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      324
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,012
<PP&E>                                             561  
<DEPRECIATION>                                     222   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,212
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                        (791) 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,436
<SALES>                                            902
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   902
<CGS>                                            2,128    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,359)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,359)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,359)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.92)

        

</TABLE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-KSB

(Mark One)
[x]   ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934

[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934

                         Commission file number: 0-25624

                                LOTTOWORLD, INC.
                 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)

                 Florida                                 65-0399794
      (State or other jurisdiction of         (IRS Employer Identification No.)
      Incorporation or organization)

           2150 Goodlette Road
               Suite 200
            Naples, Florida                                34102
  (Address of principal executive offices)              (Zip Code)

Issuer's Telephone number: (941) 643-1677

Securities registered under 12 (b) of the Exchange Act:          None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:   Common Stock 
                                                                 $.001 par value
                                                         The Nasdaq Stock Market

   
Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes X   No 
                                                              ---   ---
    
Check if disclosure  of delinquent  filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation
S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure  will be contained,  to the
best  of  the  registrant's   knowledge,  in  definitive  proxy  or  information
statements  incorporated  by  reference  in Part III of this Form  10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [X]


The Registrant's operating revenues for its most recent year were:  $ 902,336

The  aggregate  market  value of  voting  stock  held by  non-affiliates  of the
Registrant,  based on the  average of the  closing  bid and asked  prices of the
Registrant's  Common  Stock in the  over-the-counter  market as  reported by the
Nasdaq Stock  Market,  Inc. on March 21, 1997,  was  approximately  $ 3,792,442.
Shares of voting  stock held by each officer and director and by each person who
owns 5% or more of the outstanding  voting stock have been excluded in that such
persons may be deemed to be affiliates. The determination of affiliate status is
not necessarily conclusive.

As of March 21, 1997,  6,609,541 shares of Common Stock,  $.001 par value,  were
outstanding.

                      DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None

                           LOCATION OF EXHIBIT INDEX

The index of exhibits is contained in Part IV herein on page number 15.

TRANSITIONAL SMALL BUSINESS DISCLOSURE FORMAT:    YES    NO X
                                                     ---   ---
#### Cindy L. Denner, Respondent, v Heather Mizgala, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 76]

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Although defendant met her initial burden, plaintiff submitted the affidavits of her treating physi*1070cians and thereby raised triable issues of fact whether she sustained a permanent consequential limitation of use of her back and neck or a significant limitation of use of her back and neck *(see, Stanavich v Pakenas,*190 AD2d 184, 186-187, *lv denied*82 NY2d 659; *see also, Larrabee v State of New York,*216 AD2d 772, 773). One treating physician diagnosed plaintiff as suffering from chronic and severe cervical, dorsal and lumbosacral sprain with radiating pain, and intermittent paresthesias in her arms and legs; all directly and causally related to the motor vehicle accident at issue. Among the objective medical findings by the treating physicians are trigger points and spasms in plaintiff’s back *(see, Larrabee v State of New York, supra,*at 773). Two of the treating physicians opined that plaintiff’s injuries rendered plaintiff permanently disabled and unable to perform her profession as a chambermaid and housekeeper. Those findings of permanency are supported by medical evidence, and the results of the physicians’ examinations are sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact whether the limitation of use of plaintiff’s back is more than “ ‘minor, mild or slight’ ” *(Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 957, quoting *Licari v Elliott,*57 NY2d 230, 236). Thus, summary judgment is inappropriate on this record *(see, Thomas v Hulslander,*233 AD2d 567; *see also, Lopez v Senatore, 65*NY2d 1017, 1020). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Robert EBERHART, also known as Roger Eberhart, Appellant.

No. 10-3392.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: July 1, 2011.

Filed: July 8, 2011.

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Eberhart pleaded guilty to three counts of distributing more than five grams of cocaine base in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court1 imposed concurrent sentences of 57 months in prison and three years of supervised release. Eberhart appeals. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the district court abused its discretion in not imposing a more lenient sentence. Eberhart moves for appointment of new counsel.

Eberhart has not rebutted the presumption that his sentence at the bottom of the advisory guidelines range is not substantively unreasonable. *See United States v. Feemster,*572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir.2009) (en banc); *United States v. Valadez,*573 F.3d 553, 556 (8th Cir.2009) (per curiam). Additionally, having reviewed the record under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court affirmed. We deny Eberhart’s motion for new counsel and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, conditioned on counsel informing Eberhart about the procedures for seeking rehearing from this court and filing a petition for a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court of the United States.

1

. The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
         OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Mymetics Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Michael K. Allio
                                       ----------------------------------------
Dated: March 27, 2003                  Interim Chief Executive Officer


                                       /s/ John M. Musacchio
                                       ----------------------------------------
Dated: March 27, 2003                  Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as a separate
disclosure document.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Benjamin AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40523

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for D efendant-App ell ant.

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Benjamin Aguirre has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Aguirre has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the *372record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00201-CV

CAMMY RAMEY APPELLANT

V.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR 

EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION 

SERIES BSABS 2003-AC7

APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On October 7, 2010, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed 

as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless 

appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ. 

DELIVERED: October 28, 2010
Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code  I, Michael J. Marx, the Chief Financial Officer of Nano Mask, Inc. (Nano Mask), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the accompanying Form 10-Q of Nano Mask for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nano Mask.   /s/ Michael J. Marx Michael J. Marx Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  August 1, 2011
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 13, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-407 Lower Tribunal No. F11-33207

________________ 

### Dorian Hinkson, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge. Dorian Hinkson, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Exhibit 4.3


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated December 16, 2014, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-200609) of Smart Trust,
Closed-End Fund Advisors Select BDC Trust, Series 2.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


December 16, 2014
#### In the Matter of Stephanie Stafford, Petitioner, v Tino Hernanadez, as Chairman and Member of the New York City Housing Authority, et al., Respondents.

[859 NYS2d 643]

Determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA), dated March 21, 2007, terminating petitioner’s public housing tenancy on the grounds of nondesirability and breach of NYCHA’s rules and regulations, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.], entered January 16, 2008), dismissed, without costs.

The determination was supported by substantial evidence *(see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]). There exists no basis to disturb the credibility findings of the hearing officer *(see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]), in this matter where the victim, an employee of NYCHA, testified that petitioner punched her in the face causing injuries during a meeting to review petitioner’s annual income certification documents. Such testimony was corroborated by another testifying NYCHA employee, who assisted in separating petitioner from the victim, and petitioner herself acknowledged that she struck the victim, although she maintained she was justified in doing so after the victim initiated contact; petitioner pled guilty to disorderly conduct as a result of the incident. Contrary to petitioner’s contention that this was an isolated incident, the record supports the hearing officer’s finding that petitioner’s conduct toward the victim “escalated from two prior incidents of verbal abuse.” The victim testified that in 2004, petitioner menacingly approached her after a late rent notice had been *305placed under petitioner’s door, and in 2005, petitioner used foul language and repeatedly threatened the victim during a telephone call in which petitioner attempted to hold the victim responsible for her failure to receive mail after she transferred apartments.

The termination of petitioner’s tenancy does not shock our sense of fairness *(see Matter of Featherstone v Franco,*95 NY2d 550, 555 [2000]; *Matter of Shaw v Franco,*251 AD2d 156 [1998]), and we reject petitioner’s requests for a lesser penalty or to reopen the hearing to address her claims that the complained of conduct was attributable to the medication she was taking for her asthma. Petitioner fails to offer expert evidence that the dosage and types of steroids she was allegedly taking caused her to act in the manner in which she did. Concur—Tom, J.P, Mazzarelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and DeGrasse, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-3180

___________

Robert D. Johnston; Melanie K. *

Johnston, *

*

Appellants. *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Jason Brisco, in his Official Capacity as *

Harrison, Arkansas Patrolman and in * [UNPUBLISHED]

his Personal Capacity; Chief of Police *

Lyle Smith, in his Official Capacity as *

Harrison, Arkansas Police Chief and in *

his Personal Capacity; Johnny L. *

Nichols, in his Official Capacity as *

State of Arkansas Practicing Attorney *

and in his Personal Capacity; Erwin L. *

Davis, in his Official Capacity as State *

of Arkansas Practicing Attorney and in *

his Personal Capacity; Gordon Webb, *

in his Official Capacity as Boone *

County, Arkansas Circuit Court Judge *

and in his Personal Capacity; John *

Putman, in his Official Capacity as *

Boone County Arkansas Circuit Court *

Judge and in his Personal Capacity; *

Gary B. Isbell, in his Official Capacity *

as Baxter County Arkansas Circuit *

Court Judge and in his Personal *

Capacity; Danny Hickman, in his *

Official Capacity as Boone County, *

Arkansas Sheriff and in his Personal *

Capacity; Jason Day, in his Official *

Capacity as Boone County, Arkansas *
1

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas, adopting the reports and recommendations of the Honorable

Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Arkansas, now retired, and the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States

Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

-2-

Deputy Sheriff/Jail Administrator and *

in his personal capacity; Trish Smith, *

in her Official Capacity as Supervisor *

Arkansas Department of Human *

Services, Division of Children and *

Family Services and in her personal *

capacity; James Johnson, in his Official *

Capacity as Investigator/Family Service *

Worker of Arkansas Department of *

Human Services Division of Children *

and Family Services and in his Personal *

Capacity; Paul Woodruff; Ronald P. *

Kincade; Christopher Carter; Michael *

Dodson; Joseph Paul Smith, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: July 28, 2009

Filed: July 29, 2009

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Robert and Melanie Johnston appeal from the district court’s1

 adverse judgment

dismissing their civil-rights action. After careful review, we find no basis for reversal

and we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50030

 Conference Calendar 

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEROY YOUNG,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. CA-W-94-325 (CR-W-89-145-3)

- - - - - - - - - -

June 29, 1995

Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The factual and legal bases for Leroy Young's due process

violation claim were available when Young filed his first 28

U.S.C. § 2255 motion; therefore, the district court did not abuse

its discretion by dismissing his current motion as abusive under

Rule 9(b) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings. United

States v. Flores, 981 F.2d 231, 234 (5th Cir. 1993). 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 15.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-85090, 333-108896, 333-110486 333-131315, 333-140174, 333-141640,  333-148747, 333-163196, 333-169389, 333-169491 and 333-171912 on Form F-3, and Nos. 33-80947, 333-06482, 333-11720, 333-83204, 333-107943, 333-117565, 333-138837, 333-147071, 333-153710 and 333-166428 on Form S-8, of our report dated February13, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (the "Company") and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.




/s/ Brightman Almagor Zohar &Co





Brightman Almagor Zohar &Co.


Certified Public Accountants


A member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu




Tel Aviv, Israel


May 17, 2011