alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3058 

To authorize the voluntary purchase of certain properties in Treece, Kansas, 

endangered by the Cherokee County National Priorities List Site, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2009 

Ms. JENKINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize the voluntary purchase of certain properties 

in Treece, Kansas, endangered by the Cherokee County 

National Priorities List Site, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AU4 THORITY. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Not later than 30 days after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator 

7 of the Environmental Protection Agency shall make avail8 able to the State of Kansas $3,500,000 for use by the 

9 State in accordance with subsection (b). 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3058 IH

1 (b) USE OF FUNDS BY STATE.— 

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—The State of Kansas shall— 

3 (A) deposit the amounts received under 

4 subsection (a) into the fund established under 

5 Kansas House Bill 2168 (2007), entitled ‘‘An 

6 Act concerning certain communities within 

7 superfund sites; providing for relocation and 

8 other assistance.’’ and enacted on July 13, 

9 2007 (2007 Kan. Sess. Laws 17); and 

10 (B) use the amounts in accordance with 

11 that bill for the purpose of— 

12 (i) purchasing, with the consent of the 

13 property owners, the properties described 

14 in paragraph (2); and 

15 (ii) providing relocation assistance to 

16 the residents of those properties. 

17 (2) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES.—The prop18 erties referred to in paragraph (1) are— 

19 (A) properties in Treece, Kansas, that are 

20 in danger of being destroyed by subsidence re21 lating to, and that may endanger the health of 

22 occupants as a result of risks posed by, the 

23 Cherokee County National Priorities List Site; 

24 and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3058 IH

1 (B) residential properties of water cus2 tomers of Picher, Oklahoma, residing in or near 

3 Treece, Kansas. 

4 (c) LIMITATION.—The Uniform Relocation Assist5 ance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 

6 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.) shall not apply to any use of 

7 funds in accordance with this section. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
| 1. | The Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 25, 2011 | /s/ Carol K. Nelson                                                                                                                                |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | By:     Carol K. Nelson,President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)                                |
|                 |                                                                                                                                               |
| Date: March 25, 2011 | /s/ Debra L. Johnson                                                                                                                               |
|                 | By:     Debra L. Johnson,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22256]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[30Day-17-1083]

Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review--
Evaluation of the National Tobacco Prevention and Control Public 
Education Campaign; Correction

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published 
a document in the Federal Register of October 3, 2017, concerning 
request for comments on Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act 
Review--Evaluation of the National Tobacco Prevention and Control 
Public Education Campaign. The document provided the incorrect proposed 
project type (Revision).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leroy Richardson, 1600 Clifton Road, 
MS D-74, Atlanta, GA 30333; telephone (404) 639-4965; email: 
[email protected].

Correction

    In the Federal Register of October 3, 2017, in FR Doc. 2017-21122, 
on page 46059, in the first column (Proposed Project), correct the 
proposed project type to read:

    Evaluation of the National Tobacco Prevention and Control Public 
Education Campaign (OMB Control Number 0920-1083, Expiration 09/30/
2017)--Reinstatement with Change--National Center for Chronic 
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

    Dated: October 10, 2017.
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific 
Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the 
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2017-22256 Filed 10-13-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```
CERTIFICATIONS
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT







Exhibit
      32




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of RG America, Inc., a Nevada corporation
      (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Bruce A. Hall,
      Principal Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to
§
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
                Bruce A.
                HallBruce
                A. HallPrincipal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial OfficerMay
                23, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,032,326
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,497,153
<ALLOWANCES>                                   229,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,645,335
<PP&E>                                       2,453,674
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,546,188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,603,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,093,242
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,950,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,782
<OTHER-SE>                                  (6,469,856)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,603,168
<SALES>                                      4,604,766
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,906,320
<CGS>                                          957,715
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,157,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,994,317
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             105,905
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,245,778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,245,778)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,003,070)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.97)


</TABLE>
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Markus Ray Sneed

, * From the 104th District

Court of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 17745B

.

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 00 251

- CR * April 18, 2013

The State of Texas, * Opinion by McCall, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in

the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance w ith this court ’ s opinion, the judgment of the

trial court is in all things affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Thomas
B. Specketer, Vice President and Controller of MidAmerican Energy Company (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the
best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
      December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.Dated:
      February 28, 2005/s/
      Thomas B. SpecketerThomas
      B. SpecketerVice
      President and Controller(chief
      financial officer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10424 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HAMID REZA SAYADI-TAKHTEHKAR, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:96-CR-41-6

- - - - - - - - - - March 6, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Hamid Reza Sayadi-Takhtehkar appeals his convictions for conspiring to import one or more kilograms of heroin, conspiring to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute one or more kilograms of heroin, possessing with intent to distribute one or more kilograms of heroin, and tampering with a witness. He argues that the Government failed to prove that Sayadi was predisposed to commit the offense and that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion take foreignNo. 97-10424 -2-depositions. The evidence is sufficient to prove SayadiTakhtehkar’s predisposition to commit the offenses. United States v. Byrd , 31 F.3d 1329, 1334-35 (5th Cir. 1994). The district court’s denial of Sayadi-Takhtehkar’s motion to take foreign depositions was not an abuse of the court’s broad discretion. United States v. Dillman , 15 F.3d 384, 389 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Intermost
Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation (the “Company”) with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”), the undersigned, Thomas Lee, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, that to the best of his
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





This
certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be
deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any
purpose whatsoever.





Date:  November
13, 2008








By:
            /s/
      Thomas LeeThomas
      Lee, Chief Financial Officer





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed January 26, 2018.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-17-00830-CV

KASEY KRUMMEL, Appellant

V.

LEEZA GABRIELLA VAYNMAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 360th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 360-615418-17

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Boatright

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated October 17, 2017, we notified 

appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an 

extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an 

extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. On October 

26, 2017, we granted appellant’s request to extend time to file her brief and ordered her brief filed 

by November 25, 2017. To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed a second extension motion, 

or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of her brief.
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

170830F.P05

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

KASEY KRUMMEL, Appellant

No. 05-17-00830-CV V.

LEEZA GABRIELLA VAYNMAN, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 360th District Court, 

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 360-615418-17.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers. 

Justices Myers and Boatright participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee LEEZA GABRIELLA VAYNMAN recover her costs of 

this appeal from appellant KASEY KRUMMEL.

Judgment entered this 26th day of January, 2018.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6559

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus DARNELL FREEMAN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-02-427) Submitted: October 20, 2004 Decided: November 22, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darnell Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. LeDora Knight, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Darnell Freeman entered into an agreement with the Government to plead guilty to conspiracy to distribute fifty grams or more of cocaine base. In the agreement, the Government reserved the sole discretion to decide whether to file a motion for a substantial assistance departure. Following his direct appeal, Freeman filed a motion to enforce his plea agreement, seeking an order requiring the Government to f ile a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion to reduce his sentence based on his cooperation. The district court denied the motion, and Freeman timely appealed. “[A] claim that a defendant merely provided substantial assistance will not entitle a defendant to a remedy or even to discovery or an evidentiary hearing. Nor would additional but generalized allegations of improper motive.” Wade v. United States , 504 U.S. 181, 186 (1992). A defendant must make a “substantial threshold showing” of improper motive to warrant an evidentiary hearing. Id. “This court has followed the Supreme Court’s lead and strictly interpreted the Wadeexceptions, holding that the decision not to make a downward departure motion is properly within the government’s discretion.” United States v. Butler , 272 F.3d 683, 686 (4th Cir. 2001). Thus, unless the Government’s refusal to file a motion is based on an unconstitutional motive such as race or religious animus, or is not rationally related to a legitimate governmental end, district- 3 - courts are without authority to review a prosecutor’s discretionary decision not to file a substantial assistance motion. Id. Thus, Freeman’s assertions that he provided substantial assistance do not entitle him to any relief. Further, his claim that the Government breached the plea agreement by declining to investigate Freeman’s information is belied by the plea agreement. The plea agreement gave sole discretion to the Government to determine whether to file a motion for departure and did not require any specific investigation on the Government’s part. Finally, Freeman does not even allege that the Government’s failure to so move was based on an unconstitutional motive. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court and deny Freeman’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Vincent C. Smith, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 9, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    VINCENT C. SMITH
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                   |  | Vincent C. Smith       
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
----

----

| (1)    | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended      December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

| Dated:  February 29,      2008 | /s/ William J.      Fehrman        |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                                          | William      J. Fehrman            |   |
|                                          | President                          |   |
|                                          | (principal      executive officer) |   |

----

----
#### Buffalo Industries Group, Inc., Respondent, v Frontier-Kemper/Flatiron, J.V., Appellant.

[858 NYS2d 645]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Livingston County (Ann Marie Taddeo, J.), entered August 20, 2007. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.