alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IS17-522-000]


Colonial Pipeline Company; Notice of Technical Conference

    The Commission's September 7, 2017 order in the above-captioned 
proceeding \1\ directed that a technical conference be held to address 
the effect of the tariff changes proposed by Colonial Pipeline Company 
in its June 23, 2017 filing in this docket.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Colonial Pipeline Company, 160 FERC ] 61,051 (2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that a technical conference will be held on Wednesday, 
October 25, 2017 at 9:00 a.m., in a room to be designated at the 
offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street 
NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please 
send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b0a08080e181802090207021f122b0d0e1908450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1d0d2d2d4c2c2d8d3d8ddd8c5c8f1d7d4c3d29fd6dec7">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or (202) 502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to (202) 208-2106 
with the required accommodations.
    All interested persons and staff are permitted to attend. For 
further information please contact David Faerberg at (202) 502-8275 or 
email David Faerberg at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a6e4b5c434e046c4b4f58484f584d6a4c4f5849044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="783c190e111c563e191d0a1a1d0a1f381e1d0a1b561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 29, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-21873 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

Exhibit 8 

Subsidiaries of the Company 

Following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company, ownershippercentages, and the jurisdictions of incorporation or organization of each asof March 20, 2006. Each subsidiary does business in its own name only. 

|                                              |                          |
|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                              | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
| Subsidiary                                        | or Organization               |
|                                              |                          |
| MMM Exploraciones S.A. de C.V. (100%)             | Mexico                        |
| Metallica (Barbados) Inc. (100%)                  | Barbados                      |
| De Re Holdings Inc. (100%)                        | British Virgin Islands        |
| Desarrollos Metallica C.A. (100%)                 | Venezuela                     |
| (Inactive)                                        |                          |
| Datawave Sciences Inc. (100%)                     | British Virgin Islands        |
| Minera Metallica Ltda. (100%)                     | Chile                         |
| Metallica Management Inc. (100%)                  | Colorado, U.S.A.              |
| Raleigh Mining International Ltd. (100%)          | Canada                        |
| Minera San Xavier, S.A. de C.V. (100%)            | Mexico                        |
| Servicios del Plata y Oro, S.A. de C.V.    (100%) | Mexico                        |
|                                              |                          |

----
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Intermost
Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation (the “Company”) with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), the undersigned, Thomas Lee, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, that to the best of his
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





This certification is being provided
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is
it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.


Date: November
      12, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/
      Thomas LeeThomas
      LeeChief
      Financial Officer
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 11   


                              ILLINOIS CENTRAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                 COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                   ($ in millions, except share data)


                                                Years Ended December 31,
                                         1996            1995            1994
Income before extraordinary item  $      136.6    $      129.8    $      113.9

Extraordinary item, net                      -           (11.4)              -

Net income                        $      136.6    $      118.4    $      113.9

Calculation of average number of shares outstanding (1):
Primary:
Weighted average number of common
 shares outstanding                 61,417,769      62,608,274      63,895,566
   
Effect of shares issuable under 
 stock options                         459,499         276,847         193,043
                                    61,877,268      62,885,121      64,088,609

Fully diluted:
Weighted average number of common 
 shares outstanding                 61,417,769      62,608,274      63,895,566
   
Effect of shares issuable under 
 stock options                         514,271         302,043         193,043
                                    61,932,040      62,910,317      64,088,609

Income per common share:
Primary:  
Before extraordinary item         $       2.21    $       2.06    $       1.78

Extraordinary item, net                      -           (0.18)              -

Net income                        $       2.21    $       1.88    $       1.78

Fully diluted:
Before extraordinary item         $       2.21    $       2.06    $       1.78

Extraordinary item, net                      -           (0.18)              -

Net income                        $       2.21    $       1.88    $       1.78

(1)   Shares  restated to reflect the  3-for-2  stock split  declared in January
      1996 as if it too earliest period shown.
(2)   Such  items  are  included  in  primary  calculation.   Additional  shares
      represent difference b price of Common Stock for the period and the end of
      period price.



                                                         E-14
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of R&G Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the six month period ended June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the undersigned's best knowledge and belief:

         (a)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated this 14th day of August, 2002.

                              R&G Financial Corporation


                              /s/ Victor J. Galan
                              ------------------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer

                              /s/ Joseph R. Sandoval
                              ------------------------------
                              Chief Financial Officer


                                       32
Exhibit 32.2

 

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karen Werner, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
H. R. 3276 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2810 East 

Hillsborough Avenue in Tampa, Florida, as the ‘‘Reverend Abe Brown Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REVEREND ABE BROWN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2810 East Hillsborough Avenue in Tampa, 

Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Reverend Abe 

Brown Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Reverend Abe Brown Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
LIVESTAR ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Livestar Entertainment Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ray
Hawkins, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)     The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Ray
Hawkins Ray HawkinsPrincipal Executive
Officer

August 23, 2004

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Livestar Entertainment Group, Inc. and will be retained by Livestar Entertainment Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 8 -00299-CV
Chris Thompson and ETL Elite Land scape, Inc. , Appellan ts
v. The State of Texas, Appellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GV-06- 0024 59 , HO NORAB LE MARGARET A. COO P ER , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants’ br ief wa s due on November 3, 2008. On Dec ember 15, 2008, this Court notified the Appe llants that their brief wa s overdue and that their f ailure to file a

motion for ext e n s io n o f ti me b y D e c e mb e r 2 9 , 2 0 0 8 , w o u ld r e s u lt in th e d is mi s s a l o f th is a p p e al for w ant of prosec ution. To date, the Appe llants have not re sponded to this Court’s notice
. Ac co rding ly , we dismiss this appeal for

want of pr osecution.

Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and He nson Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: F ebrua

ry 6, 2009
#### In the Matter of Talib Alsaifullah, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[987 NYS2d 717]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

As petitioner approached the entrance to the facility gym, the alarm on the metal detector sounded and the correction officer who was monitoring it proceeded to conduct a pat frisk of petitioner and scanned him with a hand-held metal detector. During this process, the metal detector’s alarm activated as the officer passed it over petitioner’s right shoe, at which point petitioner struck the officer and a physical altercation ensued. Petitioner was eventually brought under control with the assistance of staff and a metal shank with a cloth handle was recovered from his right shoe. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing a weapon, assaulting staff, creating a disturbance, engaging in violent conduct and interfer*1240ing with an employee. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of all of the charges except for creating a disturbance. The determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report and related documentation, together with the testimony of the correction officers familiar with the incident, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Quezada v Fischer,*113 AD3d 1004, 1004 [2014]; *Matter of Moreno v Fischer,*100 AD3d 1167, 1167 [2012]). Although petitioner maintained that he was assaulted by the monitoring officer, that this officer planted the weapon and that the misbehavior report was written in retaliation for a grievance he had filed against the officer, his testimony presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Quezada v Fischer,*113 AD3d at 1004; *Matter of Peoples v Bezio,*94 AD3d 1299, 1300 [2012]). Furthermore, we reject petitioner’s claim that he was improperly removed from the hearing given that he continued to engage in disruptive and uncooperative behavior despite the Hearing Officer’s warnings that he would be expelled from the hearing if such conduct persisted *(see Matter of Blocker v Fischer,*107 AD3d 1285, 1286 [2013]; *Matter of Huggins v Noeth,*106 AD3d 1351, 1352 [2013]). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.

Peters, PJ., Rose, Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Exhibit
      32.1


DUTCH
        GOLD RESOURCES, INC.;
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. on Form
        10-KSB for the year period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
        the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)   The
        Company’s Annual Report on Form 10–KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006, as
        filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the
“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)   The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 This
        Certification is signed on December 28, 2007.
 
  /s/Daniel
                  W. HollisDaniel
                  W. HollisChief
                  Executive and FinancialOfficerDutch
                  Gold Resources, Inc.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Knight, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 495]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered August 7, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review. Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and Lerner, JJ., concur.
#### Napoleon T. ANNAN YARTEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY BOARD OF EDUCATION, The President; Patricia O’Neill; Christopher S. Barclay; John Doe 1-10, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-2441.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 31, 2011.

Decided: April 4, 2011.

Napoleon T. Annan Yartey, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Barry Lattner, Paul F. Leonard, Jr., County Attorney’s Office for the County of Montgomery, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Napoleon T. Annan Yartey appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his complaint alleging several state law claims against Defendants, including breach of contract, fraud and conversion claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. *Yartey v. Montgomery Bd. of Educ.,*No. 8:10-cv-01384-DKC, 2010 WL 5301037 (D.Md. Dec. 20, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3080 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3080

 To prohibit the manufacture, sale, or distribution in commerce of any 
             consumer product containing dimethylfumarate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2009

 Ms. Speier (for herself and Ms. Schakowsky) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the manufacture, sale, or distribution in commerce of any 
             consumer product containing dimethylfumarate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``DMF Free Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE MANUFACTURE AND SALE OF PRODUCTS CONTAINING 
              DMF.

    (a) Prohibition.--Beginning on the date that is 90 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act, it shall be unlawful for any person to 
manufacture for sale, offer for sale, or distribute in commerce any 
consumer product containing dimethylfumarate (DMF). Beginning on such 
date, any consumer product that contains dimethylfumarate shall be 
treated as a banned hazardous substance as defined in section 2(q) of 
the Federal Hazardous Substance Act (15 U.S.C. 1261(q)).
    (b) Treatment of Violation.--A violation of subsection (a) shall be 
treated as a violation of section 19(a)(1) of the Consumer Product 
Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(1)).
    (c) Definition of Consumer Product.--As used in this Act, the term 
``consumer product'' has the meaning given such term in section 3(a)(1) 
of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(1)).
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3228 

To reinstate and transfer certain hydroelectric licenses and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of certain hydroelectric projects 

in the Town of Canton, Connecticut. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2009 

Mr. MURPHY of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To reinstate and transfer certain hydroelectric licenses and 

extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of certain hydroelectric projects in the Town of Canton, 

Connecticut. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Collinsville Renewable 

5 Energy Promotion Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3228 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TIME AND REINSTATEMENT OF EX2 PIRED LICENSES FOR FEDERAL ENERGY 

3 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECTS NUM4 BERED 10822 AND 10823. 

5 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 

6 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

7 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com8 mission projects numbered 10822 and 10823, the Federal 

9 Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in this Act 

10 as the ‘‘Commission’’) shall, upon the enactment of this 

11 Act— 

12 (1) reinstate the licenses effective as of the date 

13 of their termination; and 

14 (2) extend the time period during which the li15 censee is required to commence the construction of 

16 each project to and including February 23, 2011. 

17 SEC. 3. TRANSFER OF LICENSES TO THE TOWN OF CANTON, 

18 CONNECTICUT. 

19 Notwithstanding section 8 of the Federal Power Act 

20 (16 U.S.C. 801) or any other provision thereof, the Com21 mission is directed to transfer the licenses for Federal En22 ergy Regulatory Commission projects numbered 10822 

23 and 10823, without delay or the institution of any pro24 ceedings, to the Town of Canton, Connecticut, not later 

25 than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS