alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 313 

To amend title 11, United States Code, to establish a priority for the payment 

of claims for duties paid to the United States by licensed customs 

brokers and sureties on behalf of a debtor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2009 

Mr. CUELLAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11, United States Code, to establish a priority 

for the payment of claims for duties paid to the United 

States by licensed customs brokers and sureties on behalf 

of a debtor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Customs Business 

5 Fairness Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

7 Section 507(a) of title 11, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 313 IH

1 ‘‘(11) Eleventh, allowed unsecured claims of 

2 customs brokers (as defined in section 641 of the 

3 Tariff Act of 1930) and sureties (as provided in sec4 tion 623 of the Tariff Act of 1930) for duties, taxes, 

5 or other charges paid to the United States Bureau 

6 of Customs and Border Protection on behalf of the 

7 debtor arising out of the importation of merchandise 

8 entered for consumption within one year before the 

9 date of the filing of the petition.’’. 

10 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT. 

11 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub12 section (b), this Act and the amendment made by this Act 

13 shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment 

15 made by this Act shall apply only with respect to cases 

16 commenced under title 11, United States Code, on or after 

17 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2972 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2972

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 115 West Edward Street in Erath, Louisiana, as the ``Conrad DeRouen, 
                           Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONRAD DEROUEN, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 115 West Edward Street in Erath, Louisiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Conrad DeRouen, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Conrad 
DeRouen, Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to the inclusion in Form 10-K of Associated Business & Commerce
Insurance Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1996, of our report dated
April 11, 1997 upon the financial statements of Associated Business & Commerce
Insurance Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994 and our report dated March 20, 1996 upon the
financial statements of Associated Business and Commerce Workers' Compensation
Self-Insurance Fund for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993.




                      /s/ SCHMIDT, RAINES, TRIESTE, DICKENSON & ADAMS, P.L.
                      -------------------------------------------------  
                      Schmidt, Raines, Trieste, Dickenson & Adams, P.L.

April 14, 1997
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of  Payment Data Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The  Quarterly  Report  for  the  quarter  ended  September  30, 2005 (the "Form
10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects, the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.


Date:  November  14,  2005

     By:  /s/  Michael  R.  Long
          ----------------------
     Michael  R.  Long
     Chief  Executive  Officer
     and  Chief  Financial  Officer
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 40642 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f- A pp el l ee v. F E L IX G U E R R E R O -F L O R E S , a ls o k n o w n a s A n to n io C a s tillo D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 7: 05- C R - 975- 1 B e fo r e J O N E S , C h ie f J u d g e , a n d J O L L Ya n d E L R O D , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederalP u bl i c D e fen d e ra p p o in te d to r e p re se n t F e li xG u e rr e ro -F lores has m o ve d f

o rl e av e t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v . Ca lif o rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 196 7) . G u errer o- F l ore s h as not f i l ed a respon se. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l ose s no n on frivo l ou s i s s u e f or a p p ea l . A ccord i n gly, cou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to w i t hdr aw i s G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rre s po ns ibi l i t i e s he r e i n, a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April30, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                   OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as  adopted),  Thomas E.  Wharton  Jr.,  the Chief  Executive  Officer of
iSECUREtrac  Corp.  (the  "Company"),  and David G.  Vana,  the Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that:

      1.    The Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
            March 31, 2005, to which this  Certification  is attached as Exhibit
            32 (the "Periodic Report"),  fully complies with the requirements of
            Section  13(a) or Section  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
            1934, as amended; and

      2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the
            end of the period  covered  by the  Periodic  Report and  results of
            operations  of the  Company for the period  covered by the  Periodic
            Report.

Dated:  May 13, 2005

/s/ Thomas E. Wharton Jr.                           /s/ David G. Vana
---------------------------                         -----------------
    Thomas E. Wharton Jr.                               David G. Vana
    Chief Executive Officer                             Chief Financial Officer


                                                                         Page 19
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than November 2, 2017.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Robert L. Triplett III, Senior 
Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Robert G. Good, Corrales, New Mexico; and Robert G. Good, 
Corrales, New Mexico, M. Carolyn Good, and Good Living Trust/Family 
Trust, both of Los Ranchos, New Mexico, Cynthia Alysce Good, and the 
2005 Natalie Grace Good Trust, both of Andover, Massachusetts, Lisa 
Lynn Thompson, Lorena, Texas, Lisa Lynn Graves Heritage Trust, Thomas 
Cody Graves, Cody Clark Graves, Cody Clark Graves Heritage Trust, Debra 
Lee Bridges, Debra Lee Graves Heritage Trust, all of Goldthwaite, 
Texas, as a group acting in concert; to retain voting shares 
Goldthwaite Bancshares, Inc., and thereby retain voting shares of Mills 
County State Bank, both of Goldthwaite, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 12, 
2017.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-22485 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael M. Searles, Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ MICHAEL M. SEARLES  **Michael M. Searles,**  **Chairman and Chief Executive Officer**   Date: September 7, 2005  
30
Exhibit 31.1   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Chi Hsun Wu, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Uni Core Holdings Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date:May 2, 2013/s/ Chia Hsun WuChia Hsun WuChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Santos RIOS-NOLASCO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10735

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 11, 2011.

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ronald T. Spriggs, Sr., Esq., Spriggs Law Office, Amarillo, TX, for Defendants Appellant.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Santos Rios-Nolasco appeals from the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation. He argues that his sentence violates the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment because it was disproportional as to his conduct underlying the offense of conviction. A 57-month sentence for a first illegal reentry offense by a defendant with a prior felony conviction for transportation of illegal aliens is not grossly disproportionate to the crime. *See Rummel v. Estelle,*445 U.S. 263, 284-85, 100 S.Ct. 1133, 63 L.Ed.2d 382 (1980); *United States v. Cardenas-Alvarez,*987 F.2d 1129, 1134 (5th Cir.1993).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brent
Santha, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date: April 14, 2004                        By: /s/ Brent Santha
                                                --------------------------------
                                            Name: Brent Santha
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.13




 Exhibit 10.13 

Carbylan Therapeutics, Inc. 

Summary of Compensation Arrangement for Samuel Lynch 

On March 5, 2013, in connection with Samuel Lynch’s appointment to the Board of Directors (the
“Board”) of Carbylan Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) and as Executive Chairman of the Board, the Board approved (1) cash compensation to Mr. Lynch in the amount of
$50,000 per annum, provided that he attends at least 85% of the Board meetings during such year, and (2) a non-qualified option to purchase 829,460 shares of the Company’s common stock, 1/48 of which would vest and become exercisable
monthly following March 1, 2013, provided that Mr. Lynch continues to serve as Executive Chairman of the Board or provide services at the request of the Company. The option will vest in full upon a change in control of the Company, as
defined in his option award agreement. 
 On May 30, 2013, in connection with Mr. Lynch’s services as a consultant and
interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, the Board approved additional cash compensation to Mr. Lynch in the amount of $110,000 per annum, effective from April 11, 2013 until June 30, 2013.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3105 

To provide that operations of the Central Valley Project shall not be restricted 

pursuant to any biological opinion issued under the Endangered Species 

Act of 1973, if such restrictions would result in levels of export less 

than the historical maximum level of export. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2009 

Mr. NUNES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide that operations of the Central Valley Project 

shall not be restricted pursuant to any biological opinion 

issued under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, if 

such restrictions would result in levels of export less 

than the historical maximum level of export. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Turn on the Pumps 

5 Act’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3105 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS OF OPERATIONS LIMITED. 

2 In connection with the operations of the Central Val3 ley Project, neither the Bureau of Reclamation nor any 

4 agency of the State of California operating a water project 

5 in coordination of the Central Valley Project shall restrict 

6 operations of their respective projects pursuant to any bio7 logical opinion issued under the Endangered Species Act 

8 of 1973, if such restrictions would result in levels of export 

9 less than the historical maximum level of export. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### ZHU DI ZHANG, Petitioner v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-60434

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 6, 2011.

Oleh Roman Tustaniwsky, Esq., Brooklyn, NY, for Petitioner.

Edward C. Durant, Tangerlia Cox, Don George Scroggin, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Zhu Di Zhang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial, as untimely, of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Conceding that motion was filed outside the 90-day limitation period, Zhang contends the BIA abused its discretion by concluding he failed to demonstrate changed circumstances in China, justifying a reasonable fear of persecution and thereby satisfying an exception to the limitation period. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Zhang maintains: his joining a political group in the United States, that opposes the Chinese government, is a changed condition in China because of the Chinese government’s awareness of his new political activism.

Our court has jurisdiction over the BIA’s denial of an untimely motion to reopen deportation proceedings where petitioner files a motion “seeking to avail himself of the exception for ‘changed circumstances’ under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii)”. *Panjwani v. Gonzales,*401 F.3d 626, 632 (5th Cir.2005). Denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed under a highly deferential abuse-of-discretion standard. La*ra v. Trominski,*216 F.3d 487, 496 (5th Cir.2000).

The BIA’s denial of Zhang’s untimely motion was not an abuse of discretion. Zhang was required to show changed country conditions arising in China to overcome the 90-day limitation period for his motion. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). Zhang’s assertion that he feared persecution for his pro-democracy activism in this country was based on changes in his personal circumstances, not changed conditions in China, and does not satisfy the requirement for an exception for untimely motions to reopen. *See In re C-W-L-*24 I. & N. Dec. 346, 349-50 (BIA 2007).

DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

January 24, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00032

- CV

IN RE D enise Marie RAMOS

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins , Justice

On January 2 1
, 20 20 , r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus . Rel ator also filed a motion for stay of t wo trial settings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus

. After considering the petition and the record

, this court concludes relator is no t entitled to the relief sought . Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.8(a). Relator ’ s motion for a stay is denied as moot. This court ’ s opinion will issue at a later date.

_________________________________ Sandee Bry an Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 24th day of January, 2020

.

_______________________________ ____ MICHAEL A. CRUZ
, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018

- CI

- 21009 , styled In the Matter of the Ma rriage of Denise Marie Ramos and Reynaldo Esparaza, Jr. , pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Laura Salinas presiding.