alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              4,641
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                  0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    6,125
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        23,367
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             41,912
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               41,467
<LOANS>                                            73,435
<ALLOWANCE>                                         1,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    152,254
<DEPOSITS>                                        128,356
<SHORT-TERM>                                            0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 1,189
<LONG-TERM>                                         1,622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              145
<OTHER-SE>                                         20,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                    152,254
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     3,037
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   1,844
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                      358
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    5,239
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  2,597
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     59
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               2,583
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                         150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                      0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     1,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       857
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                            857
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                          552
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       7.31
<LOANS-NON>                                           582
<LOANS-PAST>                                            0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                        0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                      959
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                          14
<RECOVERIES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   1,015
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                  486
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                               529
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             563
<SECURITIES>                                     7,802
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,105)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,814
<PP&E>                                          12,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,400)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,906
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,969
<SALES>                                         10,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,956
<CGS>                                            2,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (81)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,314)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,314)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,314)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)


</TABLE>
JUPITER
      GLOBAL HOLDINGS, CORP.


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of JUPITER GLOBAL HOLDINGS, CORP. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Edwin Kwong, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)    
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      “Edwin Kwong”


Edwin
      Kwong


Principal
      Financial Officer


Dated:
      September 20, 2005













A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to JUPITER GLOBAL HOLDINGS, CORP. and will be retained by JUPITER
      GLOBAL HOLDINGS, CORP. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Performance Review Board Members

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) located 
within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is publishing 
the names of the Performance Review Board Members who are reviewing 
performance for Fiscal Year 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon O'Brien, Deputy Director, 
Executive and Scientific Resources Office, Human Resources Office, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE., 
Mailstop K-15, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone (770) 488-1781.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 5, U.S.C. Section 4314(c)(4) of the 
Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Public Law 95-454, requires that the 
appointment of Performance Review Board Members be published in the 
Federal Register. The following persons will serve on the CDC 
Performance Review Boards or Panels, which will oversee the evaluation 
of performance appraisals of Senior Executive Service members for the 
Fiscal Year 2017 review period:

Branche, Christine, Co-Chair
Shelton, Dana, Co-Chair
Arispe, Irma
Boyle, Coleen
Curlee, Robert C.
Dean, Hazel
Henderson, Joseph
Kosmos, Christine
Kotch, Alan
Qualters, Judith
Smagh, Kevin

    Dated: October 10, 2017.
Sandra Cashman,
Executive Secretary, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2017-22282 Filed 10-13-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3123 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 

Bureau of Reclamation, to remedy problems caused by 

a collapsed drainage tunnel in Leadville, Colorado, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3123 EH

1 SECTION 1. LEADVILLE MINE DRAINAGE TUNNEL REMEDI2 ATION. 

3 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

4 ‘‘Leadville Mine Drainage Tunnel Remediation Act of 

5 2009’’. 

6 (b) TUNNEL REMEDIATION.—The Reclamation 

7 Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (Pub8 lic Law 102–575) is amended as follows: 

9 (1) By striking section 705. 

10 (2) In section 708(a)— 

11 (A) by striking ‘‘(a)’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘(a)(1)’’; 

13 (B) by striking ‘‘The Secretary shall have’’ 

14 and inserting ‘‘Except as provided by paragraph 

15 (2), the Secretary shall have’’; and 

16 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(2) The Secretary shall participate in the implemen18 tation of the operable unit 6 remedy for the California 

19 Gulch Superfund Site, including, but not limited to, the 

20 following actions: 

21 ‘‘(A) Treating water behind any blockage or 

22 bulkhead in the Leadville Mine Drainage Tunnel, in23 cluding surface water diverted into the Tunnel 

24 workings as part of the remedy. 

25 ‘‘(B) Managing and maintaining the mine pool 

26 behind such blockage or bulkhead at a level that pre-
3 

•HR 3123 EH

1 cludes surface runoff and releases and minimizes the 

2 potential for tunnel failure due to excessive water 

3 pressure in the tunnel.’’. 

4 (3) In section 708(f), by striking ‘‘and 708’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘, 708, and 709’’. 

6 (4) By adding at the end of title VII the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 709. TUNNEL MAINTENANCE. 

9 ‘‘The Secretary shall take such steps to repair or 

10 maintain the structural integrity of the Leadville Mine 

11 Drainage Tunnel (LMDT) as may be necessary in order 

12 to prevent tunnel failure and to preclude uncontrolled re13 lease of water from any portion of the tunnel.’’. 

14 (5) In the table of sections contained in section 

15 2— 

16 (A) by striking the item relating to section 

17 705; and 

18 (B) by inserting after the item relating to 

19 section 708 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 709. Tunnel maintenance.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3123 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior, acting 

in Leadville, Colorado, and for other purposes. problems caused by a collapsed drainage tunnel through the Bureau of Reclamation, to remedy
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Ricky Gee Hing Ang, Chief Executive Officer of Sun New Media, Inc., certify that1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Sun New Media, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e)and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report was being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   /s/ Ricky Gee Hing Ang Ricky Gee Hing Ang, Chief Executive Officer and Director  Date:September 5, 2006
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2972 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 115 West Edward Street in Erath, Louisiana, 

as the ‘‘Conrad DeRouen, Jr. Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2972 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. CONRAD DEROUEN, JR. POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 115 West Edward Street in 

4 Erath, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Conrad DeRouen, Jr. Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Conrad DeRouen, Jr. 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140159 & (13) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140159 

 COA: 292891 

Wayne CC: 2004-004270 

GREGORY CARL WASHINGTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 19, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel ESTRADA, also known as Raul Sandoval, also known as Victor Rojas-Ferman, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-51498

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 2008.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western *406District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Miguel Estrada raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                                        390,463
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              10,651,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  282,991
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            110,704,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               0
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 52,207,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              110,704,998
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           34,400,228
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           25,127,518
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            5,396,281
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          4,783,105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (906,676)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (906,676)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (906,676)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0


</TABLE>
#### Stephanie Barnes, Respondent, v Wayne F. Hodge, Defendant, and United Parcel Service, Inc., Appellant.

[989 NYS2d 467]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered March 6, 2013, which, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) to dismiss plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

Plaintiff pedestrian alleges that she was struck by a vehicle owned by UPS, and operated by its driver, defendant Hodge, while she was in an crosswalk. At issue is plaintiffs demand for punitive damages.

To hold UPS vicariously liable for punitive damages, plaintiff must establish that UPS “authorized, participated in, consented to or ratified the conduct giving rise to such damages” *(Melfi v Mount Sinai Hosp.,*64 AD3d 26, 42 [1st Dept 2009]; *Ostroy v Six Sq. LLC,*100 AD3d 493, 495 [1st Dept 2012]). We must consider whether the complaint contains the requisite allegations that “the wrongdoing is intentional or deliberate, presents circumstances of aggravation or outrage, evinces a fraudulent or evil motive, or is in such conscious disregard of the rights of another that it is deemed willful and wanton” *(Bishop v 59 W. 12th St. Condominium,*66 AD3d 401, 402 [1st Dept 2009]; *see also Giblin v Murphy,*73 NY2d 769, 772 [1988]).

“Although on a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ allegations are presumed to be true and accorded every favorable inference, conclusory allegations—claims consisting of bare legal conclusions with no factual specificity—are insufficient to survive a motion to dismiss” *(Godfrey v Spano,*13 NY3d 358, 373 [2009]). Here, the complaint alleges in conclusory and conjectural fashion that “defendants were grossly, willfully and wantonly negligent and acted with reckless indifference to the health and safety of plaintiff.” These legal conclusions are insufficient as the complaint does not allege any facts to demonstrate that *634UPS engaged in conduct which rose to the high level of moral culpability to support a claim for punitive damages *(see Coville v Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.,*30 AD3d 744, 745 [3d Dept 2006]). Plaintiff cannot maintain the punitive damages demand on the hope that discovery might someday provide a basis for it *(see Mandarin Trading Ltd. v Wildenstein, 65*AD3d 448, 451 [1st Dept 2009], *affd*16 NY3d 173 [2011]). However, should discovery reveal facts supporting a claim for punitive damages, plaintiff could of course move for leave to replead the demand *(see 87 Chambers, LLC v 77 Reade, LLC,*114 AD3d 525 [1st Dept 2014]).

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Andrias, Saxe and Clark, JJ.