alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Paul Edward CRAWFORD, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-30453.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 2, 2008.

Timothy J. Racicot, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, for PlaintiffAppellee.

John P. Rhodes, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Paul Crawford appeals the sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the district court’s judicial fact findings in support of the revocation sentence violated the Sixth Amendment. As Crawford acknowledges, this contention is foreclosed by *United States v. Huerta-Pimental,*445 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 545, 166 L.Ed.2d 403 (2006).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 20, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00816

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.L., A CHILD,

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 11

- 21526

- CV Honorable Thomas F. Lee, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal. Although it appeared the appellate record was complete on January 29, 2014, an additional volume of reporter’s record was filed February 10, 2014. Accordingly, it originally appeared as though appellant’s brief was due February 18, 2014, but because the record was not complete until February 10, 2014, appellant’s was not due until February 20, 2014. Appellant has filed an extension of time to file the brief, asking until March
17, 2014. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant to file appellant’s brief until
March 17, 2014. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent written proof of extraordinary circumstan ces.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit
10.18(b)


 


Land
Compensation/Lease Agreement


 


	Party A:	Pingdingshan Xinhua District Jiaodian Town Gaozhuang Village Committee
	 	 
	Party
B:	Pingdingshan Hengji Concrete Co., Ltd.




  


The
20.6493 mu (approximately 3.4 acres) land located at East Xixie Road, North Jiaodian Town Gaozhuang Village, west of agricultural
land, north of Gaozhuang Village, east of Xixie Road, and south of agricultural land, is now in use by Party B. In January 2009
Party B already paid RMB 4,600,000 to Party A as requisition payment for the land. Party A agreed to transfer the land use right
to Party B, and Party B is in the process of registering the transfer. Until the date that Party B completes the registration,
Party B’s requisition payment to Party A shall be deemed lease payment for the land for 50 years commencing January 2009.
When Party B completes the registration, the portion of the lease payment for the then remaining lease term shall be deemed requisition
payment.


 


The
terms under this agreement are negotiated and agreed upon by both parties.


 


	Party
                                         A: Pingdingshan Xinhua District

                                         Jiaodian Town Gaozhuang Village Committee

	 	Party
                                         B: Pingdingshan Hengji Concrete Co., Ltd.
 (Stamp)
	(Stamp and Signature)	 	


	 	 	 
	February 12, 2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) located within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is publishing the names of the Performance Review Board Members who are reviewing performance for Fiscal Year 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sharon O'Brien, Deputy Director, Executive and Scientific Resources Office, Human Resources Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE., Mailstop K-15, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone (770) 488-1781.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Title 5, U.S.C. Section 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Public Law 95-454, requires that the appointment of Performance Review Board Members be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    . The following persons will serve on the CDC Performance Review Boards or Panels, which will oversee the evaluation of performance appraisals of Senior Executive Service members for the Fiscal Year 2017 review period:                

Branche, Christine, Co-Chair

Shelton, Dana, Co-Chair

Arispe, Irma

Boyle, Coleen

Curlee, Robert C.

Dean, Hazel

Henderson, Joseph

Kosmos, Christine

Kotch, Alan

Qualters, Judith

Smagh, Kevin

Dated: October 10, 2017.

Sandra Cashman,

Executive Secretary, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2017-22282 Filed 10-13-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Appian,  Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Steven R. Fey,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Steven R. Fey
-----------------------------
Steven R. Fey
Secretary, Director
(Principal Financial Officer)
November 19, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George C. Carp, state and attest that:



|1. | I am the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Main Place Funding, LLC (the Registrant).
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) containing financial statements fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods presented.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ George C. Carp                        
|George C. Carp                            
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|March 31, 2008
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10409 Conference Calendar

YUK RUNG TSANG, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, ET AL., Respondents, THE COMMUNITY CORRECTION MANAGER FOR THE BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:98-CV-114

-------------------- December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Federal prisoner Yuk Rung Tsang appeals the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) denied him a one-year sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e), after he completed a 500-hour drug-treatment program. Tsang does not brief anyNo. 99-10409 -2- argument in connection with the ex-post-facto claim he raised in the district court, and that claim is waived. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a). Tsang renews his argument that the denial of the one-year credit violated his due process rights. His due-process claim fails because there is no protected liberty interest in early release under § 3621. See Rublee v. Fleming , 160 F.3d 213, 216 (5th Cir. 1998); Venegas v. Henman , 126 F.3d 760, 765 (5th Cir. 1997)(“[t]he loss of the mere opportunity to be considered for discretionary early release is too speculative to constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally protected liberty interest”),
cert. denied , 118 S. Ct. 1679 (1998). Accordingly, the district court did not err in dismissing his petition, and its judgment is AFFIRMED. Tsang’s motions for an expedited appeal and for discovery are DENIED. AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22033]



[[Page 47569]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4339-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Puerto Rico; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-4339-DR), dated September 20, 
2017, and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 2, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is hereby amended to include the 
following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 20, 2017.

    The municipalities of Adjuntas, Aguada, Aquadilla, 
A[ntilde]asco, Cabo Rojo, Camuy, Gu[aacute]nica, Guayanilla, 
Hatillo, Hormigueros, Isabela, Lajas, Larus, Las Mar[iacute]as, 
Maricao, Mayag[uuml]ez, Moca, Pe[ntilde]uelas, Quebradillas, 
Rinc[oacute]n, Sabana Grande, San Germ[aacute]n, San 
Sebasti[aacute]n, and Yauco for Individual Assistance (already 
designated for debris removal and emergency protective measures 
[Categories A and B], including direct federal assistance, under the 
Public Assistance program).
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-22033 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### Salvador IBARRA-NUNEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-74406.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 10, 2011.

Noam Mendelson, Mendelson & Associates, Daly City, CA, for Petitioner.

Margaret Anne O’Donnell, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, ORP-District Director, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Salvador Ibarra-Nunez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, *Singh v. INS,*295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002), we deny the petition for review.

To the extent we have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of Ibarra-Nunez’s motion to reopen, *see Fernandez v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 592, 601 (9th Cir.2006), we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. *See Singh,*295 F.3d at 1039 (the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”).

Ibarra-Nunez’s remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT  23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Frederick Brewing Company on Form S-3 (File No. 333-25743 and File No.
333-35655) of our report dated March 30, 1998, on our audits of the financial
statements of Frederick Brewing Company as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for
the years then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB/A.



                                                        Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


McLean, Virginia 
April 23, 1998
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7975

YAQUB HAMEED MUWAKKIL, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus LEROY ROUNDTREE HASSELL, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia; ELIZABETH D. LACY, Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia; BARBARA M. KEENAN, Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia; LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR., Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia; CYNTHIA D. KINEER, Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia; DONALD LEMONS, Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia; G. STEVEN AGEE, Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia; HARRY L. CARRICO, Senior Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia; A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON, Senior Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia; ROSCOE B. STEPHENSON, JR., Senior Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia; PATRICIA H. KRUEGER, Clerk, Supreme Court of Virginia, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-05-1118-1) Submitted: May 22, 2006 Decided: June 12, 2006 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.- 2 - Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yaqub Hameed Muwakkil, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Yaqub Hameed Muwakkil appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Muwakkil v. Hassell , No. CA-05-1118-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Rome Bancorp, Inc

Form 10-QSB

For the quarter ended September 30, 2004

EXHIBIT 32.1

Statement furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned, Charles M. Sprock, is the Chief Executive Officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



November 9, 2004						/s/Charles M. Sprock

Dated								Charles M. Sprock

Rome Bancorp, Inc.

Form 10-QSB

For the quarter ended September 30, 2004

Statement furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned, David C. Nolan, is the Chief Financial Officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



November 9, 2004					/s/David C. Nolan 
Dated							David C. Nolan
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ CRAIG RAGLAND , Petitioner,

v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AR MY , Respondent.

__________________________
201 3

- 3 0 54

__________________________
Petiti on for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no

. PH0752120027

- I

- 1.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________

O R D E R

Craig Ragland moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Upon consideration thereof

,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

The motion is denied

. The docketing fee must be paid within 14 days from the filing of this order

. Case: 13-3054 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 02/13/2013CRAIG RAGLAND v. A RMY 2

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s 2 4 Case: 13-3054 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 02/13/2013
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof NitroMed, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Kenneth M. Bate, President, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)            The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  March 19, 2009 | /s/ Kenneth M. Bate                                                                                                                     |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Kenneth M. Bate                                                                                                                         |
|                        | President, Chief  Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer*(Principal Executive Officer and Principal  Financial Officer)* |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

          Name of Subsidiary                      State of
          ------------------                      --------
                                                Incorporation  Percent Owned
                                                -------------  -------------

          1)  Glas-Craft, Inc.                     Indiana         100%
          2)  Raven Lining Systems, Inc.           Oklahoma        100%
          3)  Cohesant Export, Inc.                Barbados        100%
          4)  Cohesant of Missouri, Inc.           Missouri        100%
              (F/K/A American Chemical
               Company)
          5)  RTM Systems, Inc.                    Indiana          67%