alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                   5
<CIK>                                       0001016628 
<NAME>                                      HOMESIDE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000 
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS
       
<S>                                        <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              SEP-01-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                NOV-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                            1 
<CASH>                                                16,590
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        252,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   3,479,107
<PP&E>                                                35,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     3,514,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2,042,771
<BONDS>                                              900,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                 531
<OTHER-SE>                                           570,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       3,514,521
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      72,131
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      38,537
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       33,594
<INCOME-TAX>                                          13,102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   20,492
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                          20,492
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2231

WAYNE E. PATTERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

IRMA JOYCE RUBY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-96-209-2)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne E. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Irma Joyce Ruby, Appellee

Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
September 25, 2012.

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TIFFANY NICOLE PETTIS, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00434-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court 

orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2781 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

segments of the Molalla River in Oregon, as components 

of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2781 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER 

2 SEGMENTS. 

3 Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

4 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(lll) MOLALLA RIVER, OREGON.—The fol7 lowing segments in the State of Oregon, to be adminis8 tered by the Secretary of the Interior as a recreational 

9 river: 

10 ‘‘(A) MOLALLA RIVER.—The approximately 

11 15.1 miles from the southern boundary line of sec12 tion 19, Township 7 south, Range 4 east down13 stream to the edge of the Bureau of Land Manage14 ment boundary in section 7, Township 6 south, 

15 Range 3 east. 

16 ‘‘(B) TABLE ROCK FORK MOLALLA RIVER.— 

17 The approximately 6.2 miles from the easternmost 

18 Bureau of Land Management boundary line in the 

19 northeast quarter of section 4, Township 7 south, 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2781 RFS 

1 Range 4 east downstream to the confluence 

2 with the Molalla River.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 19, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Andrew Peterson et al., Appellants, v Scandurra Trucking Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, and Berrest L. Biggs, et al., Respondents.

[666 NYS2d 453]

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated December 4, 1996, which granted the separate motions of the defendant Ernest L. Biggs s/h/a Berrest L. Biggs and the defendant Arttin Kofi for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

*359The Supreme Court correctly determined that the defendants Ernest L. Biggs s/h/a Berrest L. Biggs and Arttin Kofi, whose vehicles were struck from behind while stopped at a red traffic light, were entitled to summary judgment (see, *Corbly v Butler,*226 AD2d 418; *Abramowicz v Roberto,*220 AD2d 374; *Gambino v City of New York,*205 AD2d 583). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.
----

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SE Global Equities Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Toby Chu , President, CEO and Director of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Partnership.

 

| Date: May 17,  2004 | /s/ Toby Chu

_______________________      Toby Chu, CEO, Chairman & Director

 
  |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 21**

**BUILDING MATERIALSCORPORATION OF AMERICA**

**SUBSIDIARIESOF THE REGISTRANT**

| ** **                                          | ** **   | **STATE  OF** |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------|---------------|
| ***COMPANY***                                       | *** *** | *** ***  | *** *** | ***INCORPORATION*** |
| BMCA Quakertown Inc.                                |         | Delaware      |
| BMCA Insulation Products  Inc.                      |         | Delaware      |
| Building Materials  Investment Corporation          |         | Delaware      |
| Building Materials  Manufacturing Corporation       |         | Delaware      |
| HBP Acquisition LLC                                 |         | Delaware      |
| GAF Leatherback Corp.                               |         | Delaware      |
| GAF Materials  Corporation (Canada)                 |         | Delaware      |
| GAF Premium Products  Inc.                          |         | Delaware      |
| Wind Gap Real Property  Acquisition Corp            |         | Delaware      |
| GAF Real  Properties, Inc.                     |         | Delaware      |
| GAFTECH Corporation                                 |         | Delaware      |
| LL Building Products  Inc.                          |         | Delaware      |
| Ductwork Manufacturing  Corporation                 |         | Delaware      |
| Pequannock Valley Claim  Service Company, Inc. |         | Delaware      |
| South Ponca Realty Corp.                            |         | Delaware      |
|                                                     |              |               |  |  |

 

 

----
#### Patience Assiakoley, Appellant, v Susie Irvin et al., Respondents.

[665 NYS2d 640]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered April 16, 1996, which, *inter alia,*granted defendants’ motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had not established a “serious injury”, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny defendants’ motion and cross motion and reinstate the complaint and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

In this personal injury action by a passenger in a taxicab, the affidavit of plaintiffs treating physician specifically indicated the extent of the limitation, and described a “permanent” spinal injury that prevents plaintiff from moving her neck “to the full range of what is normal”. Such affidavit, coupled with plaintiffs affirmations specifying the extent of her injury, was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether plaintiff suffered a “serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). However, given the disputed issues of fact, plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on the “serious injury” issue was properly denied. Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUN 27 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v. VICTOR MANUEL PRIETO-LOERA, aka Manuel Torres-Loera, aka Victor Lugo, aka Victor Lua,

Defendant-Appellant. Case No. 96-4160 (D.C. 96-CR-150) (District of Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before ANDERSON, HENRY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges

.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has unanimously determined that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.2

Defendant Victor Prieto-Loera appeals a 57-month se ntence imposed after a plea of guilty to one count of unlawful re-entry by a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Mr. Prieto-Loera’s counsel fil ed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that, in her opinion , there are no meritorious grounds for appeal. This court ordered Mr. Prieto-Loera to respond to counsel’s Anders brief on or before March 7, 1997, and to date, he has failed to do so. We have engaged in a thorough search of the record and are convinced that Mr. Prieto-Loera’s counsel has done the same. We a gree with counsel that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal. According t o counsel, Mr. Prieto-Loera “feels that 57 months is too long of a sentence for the type of crime he committed.” Aplt.’s Br. at 2. Apparently, Congres s and the Sentencing Commission feel otherwise; Mr. Prieto-Loera’s 57-mo nth sentence is within the guideline range for his offense level and criminal history category. Accordingly, we GRANT counsel leave to withdraw, and DISMISS the appeal. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court, Robert H. Henry Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,510
<SECURITIES>                                     4,657
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,318)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,105
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,705
<PP&E>                                          11,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,062)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,682
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,024
<SALES>                                          4,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,131
<CGS>                                            1,239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    87
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,319)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
 OF PERIODIC REPORT

As
 adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
 connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter ended December 31, 2007 of Integrated BioPharma,
 Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
 E. Gerald Kay, the Chief Executive Officer of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. certifies,
 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:

| | (1) | the
 Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This
 certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
 extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement has been provided to
 the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
 request.

|Date:February 19,
2008 |  | By: /s/ E. Gerald Kay         
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|                       |  | Name: E. Gerald Kay           
|                       |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
                               ------------
                               CERTIFICATION
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K (the
"Report") of AMCON Distributing Company (the "Company") for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2007, I, Christopher H. Atayan, Chief Executive Officer
and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

    (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
       of the Company.


Date: November 6, 2007       /s/ Christopher H. Atayan
                             ------------------------------
                             Title: Chief Executive Officer
                              and Vice Chairman



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to AMCON Distributing Company and will be retained by AMCON
Distributing Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JANARD ORANGE
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 11

- 2280

[March 9, 2016 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit; Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case No. 09

- 8042CF10B

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ellen Griffin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Melvin G. Mosier and Nicholas I. Igwe, Assistant Attorneys Genera l, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Upon consid eration of the February 9, 2016 order of the Supreme Court

of Florida whic h quashes the September 3, 2014 decision of this court, the

above

- styled case is hereby remanded to the lower tribunal for

res e ntencing in accordance with the February 9, 2016 order of the Supreme Court of Florida.

S TEVENSON

, C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          27,461
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      126
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,728
<PP&E>                                           2,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,099
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,031
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,130
<SALES>                                          1,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,798
<CGS>                                            1,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (38,194)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,194)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,194)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.88)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary restated financial information extracted
from the Registrant's  consolidated  financial statements for the twelve month's
ended June 30,  1997,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000927790
<NAME>                        Union Acceptance Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         147,202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (780)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               269,590
<PP&E>                                           4,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,574)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 391,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,106
<BONDS>                                        279,314
<COMMON>                                        58,270
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   391,268
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,426
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,188
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,048
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,166
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,882
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,882 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
        



</TABLE>