alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 284 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 284

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to complete a special resource 
   study of the site of the Battle of Camden, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2009

  Mr. Spratt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to complete a special resource 
   study of the site of the Battle of Camden, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This title may be cited as the ``Battle of Camden Study Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior shall complete a 
special resource study of the site of the Battle of Camden fought in 
South Carolina on August 16, 1780, and the site of Historic Camden, 
which is currently a National Park System Affiliated Area, to 
determine--
            (1) the suitability and feasibility of designating these 
        sites as a unit or units of the National Park System; and
            (2) the methods and means for the protection and 
        interpretation of these sites by the National Park Service, 
        other Federal, State, or local government entities or private 
        or non-profit organizations.
    (b) Study Requirements.--The Secretary shall conduct the study in 
accordance with section 8(c) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5).
    (c) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds 
are made available to carry out this title, the Secretary shall submit 
to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a 
report containing--
            (1) the results of the study; and
            (2) any recommendations of the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3016 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3016

  To prohibit the use of certain funds to host Iranian officials for 
         Independence Day celebrations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2009

Mr. Burton of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the use of certain funds to host Iranian officials for 
         Independence Day celebrations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF CERTAIN FUNDS TO HOST IRANIAN 
              OFFICIALS FOR INDEPENDENCE DAY CELEBRATIONS 
              INTERNATIONALLY OR DOMESTICALLY.

    (a) In General.--No funds made available to the Department of State 
or any other Federal department or agency for fiscal year 2009 may be 
used to host Iranian officials for Independence Day celebrations 
internationally or domestically.
    (b) Independence Day Celebrations Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``Independence Day celebrations'' means any celebration on any day 
relating to the July 4th Independence Day celebrations of the United 
States.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-30146

Summary Calendar

 

ROBERT LEVY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHRISTINE G. DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

(02-CV-169)

--------------------

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Robert Levy appeals the dismissal of his

petition for de novo review of the denial of his application for

naturalization, filed under 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c). That statute

provides that judicial review of the denial of an application for

naturalization is available after a hearing before an immigration

officer. Levy failed to comply with the applicable regulations for

obtaining such a hearing, see 8 C.F.R. §§ 103.2(a)(1), § 336.2(a),

§ 499.1, so the district court was without jurisdiction to review
2

the denial of his application. See 8 U.S.C. § 336.9(d); see also

Townsend v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, INS, 799 F.2d 179, 181 (5th Cir.

1986). 

The instant appeal is 

DISMISSED.
#### John Dailey et al., Appellants, v New York State Thruway Authority, Respondent.

[986 NYS2d 854]

In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the claimants appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Ruderman, J.), dated September 12, 2012, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the claim.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Court of Claims properly concluded that there was no basis for imposing liability on the defendant New York State Thruway Authority (hereinafter the NYSTA) for the subject accident on the Mountainview Avenue Bridge (hereinafter the bridge). The court properly determined that responsibility for maintaining and repairing the bridge reverted by operation of law to the Village of Nyack upon completion of the construction of the bridge. We discern no basis to disturb the court’s determination, as it was “warranted by the facts” in the record *(Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford,*60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]; *see Village of Mamaroneck v Town of Rye,*45 AD3d 577, 578 [2007]; *Wright v Cetek Tech., Inc., 25*AD3d 602 [2006]). The evidence established that a reversion letter dated January 3, 1957, which was sent by the NYSTA upon the completion of the initial construction of the bridge, set forth that the sidewalks and other appurtenances “shall be maintained and kept in repair by the town.” The municipality’s responsibility for the maintenance of the bridge was further confirmed by additional correspondence sent in 1992 and 1993 and is consistent with Public Authorities Law § 359 (4), which provides that highways carried over a thruway section “shall, upon completion of the work, revert to and become the responsibility, with regard to maintenance and repair, of the . . . municipality . . . formerly having jurisdiction there over” *(see Village of Mamaroneck v Town of Rye,*45 AD3d at 578; *Carlino v County of Albany,*178 AD2d 772, 773 [1991]). Moreover, there was insufficient admissible evidence to support the claimants’ contention that the NYSTA had assumed any *663such duty of maintenance, or that a special relationship existed between the NYSTA and the injured claimant *(see Pelaez v Seide,*2 NY3d 186 [2004]).

The claimants’ remaining contentions are without merit.

Mastro, J.E, Leventhal, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-660

In Re: ANTHONY GRANDISON; STEVEN H. OKEN; JOHNBOOTH-EL; WESLEY EUGENE BAKER, et al., Plaintiffs, Prisoners of the Maryland Adjustment Center, under a sentence of death, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Petitioners.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-97-1396-S) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 13, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Grandison, Steven H. Oken, John Booth-El, Wesley Eugene Baker, Petitioners Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Grandison, Steven H. Oken, John Booth-El, and Wesley Eugene Baker petition for a writ of mandamus seeking relief from the district court's orders dismissing their lawsuit demanding adeclaration that certain provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 are unconstitutional. Court records reveal that an appeal from the district court's decision is pending with this court. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is available only if there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, see In re: Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re: United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has "no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires" and that his right to such relief is "clear and indisputable." Allied Chem. Corp v. Diaflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980) (citations omitted).The petitioners have not made the required showing. Accordingly, while we grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny mandamus relief. We deny the motion to expedite appeal or for temporary relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-3 rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         198,725
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  227,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,384,801
<PP&E>                                         59,460
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,475,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,685,166
<BONDS>                                        1,333,142
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,255,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,475,988
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,910
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               74,784
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                29,126
<INCOME-TAX>                                   14,354
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            14,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,772
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Sanctions Actions Pursuant to Executive Order 13581

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the name of a person whose property and 
interests in property have been unblocked pursuant to Executive Order 
13581 of July 24, 2011, ``Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal 
Organizations.''

DATES: OFAC's actions described in this notice were effective on June 
21, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Department of the Treasury's 
Office of Foreign Assets Control: Assistant Director for Licensing, 
tel.: 202-622-2480, Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 
202-622-4855, Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, 
tel.: 202-622-2490; or the Department of the Treasury's Office of the 
Chief Counsel (Foreign Assets Control), Office of the General Counsel, 
tel.: 202-622-2410.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Availability

    The list of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN 
List) and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are 
available from OFAC's Web site at http://www.treasury.gov/ofac.

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On June 21, 2017, OFAC removed from the SDN List the person listed 
below, whose property and interests in property were blocked pursuant 
to Executive Order 13581.

Individual

    1. DRISCOLL, Mary Ann, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; DOB 01 
Jun 1950 to 30 Jun 1950; nationality Canada (individual) [TCO] (Linked 
To: CHEXX INC.; Linked To: INDIAN RIVER (UK) LTD.; Linked To: PACNET 
GROUP).

    Dated: June 21, 2017.
Andrea Gacki
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.

    Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the 
Federal Register on Friday, October 6, 2017.

[FR Doc. 2017-22097 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 47083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21890]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2017 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 47083]]



MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

5 CFR Part 1201


Practices and Procedures

AGENCY: Merit Systems Protection Board.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or the Board) is 
amending its rules of practice and procedure in this part to reflect 
the relocation of its Western Regional Office.

DATES: Effective Date: October 16, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Everling, Acting Clerk of the 
Board, Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street NW., Washington, 
DC 20419; phone: (202) 653-7200; fax: (202) 653-7130; or email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cea3bdbeac8ea3bdbeace0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ff2eceffddff2eceffdb1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2017, MSPB will relocate its 
Western Regional Office from 201 Mission Street, San Francisco, CA, to 
1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA. Appendix II of this part is amended to 
show the new address. The facsimile number is changing to (510) 273-
7136. The geographical areas served by the Western Regional Office are 
unchanged. The Board is publishing this as a final rule pursuant to 5 
U.S.C. 1204(h).

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 1201

    Administrative practice and procedure.

    Accordingly, the Board amends 5 CFR part 1201 as follows:

PART 1201--PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 1201 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1204, 1305, and 7701, and 38 U.S.C. 4331, 
unless otherwise noted.

Appendix II to Part 1201--[Amended]

0
2. Amend Appendix II to part 1201 in item 5 by removing ``201 Mission 
Street, Suite 2310, San Francisco, California 94105-1831 Facsimile No.: 
(415) 904-0580'' and adding, in its place, ``1301 Clay Street, Suite 
1380N, Oakland, California 94612-5217, Facsimile No.: (510) 273-7136.''

Jennifer Everling,
Acting Clerk of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-21890 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7400-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32.2

STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The
undersigned, David C. Nolan, is the Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc. (the Company). This statement is
being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report).

By
execution of this statement, I certify that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
 Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and                                                              
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly
 presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
 operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
 Report.

This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be
deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request

|                  |                                                      | 
|----------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: May 8, 2009 | /s/ David C. Nolan                                   | 
|                  |                                                      | 
|                  | David C. Nolan                                       | 
|                  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gary Marino, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 41]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered June 8, 1995, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and trespass, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress identification testimony and statements made by him to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the eyewitness’s viewing of the defendant as he was led out of the station house in handcuffs was an accidental viewing and was neither unduly suggestive nor the result of questionable police practice *(see, People v Richardson,*212 AD2d 743; *People v McCoy,*211 AD2d 732; *People v Brown,*123 AD2d 875; *cf., People v Riley,*70 NY2d 523; *People v Bradley,*117 AD2d 675). Therefore, the *530hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress the identification testimony.

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21526]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Time-Sensitive Obesity.
    Date: October 23, 2017.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Michele L. Barnard, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
Room 7353, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, (301) 
594-8898, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c9aba8bba7a8bbada489acb1bdbba8e7a7a0adada2e7a7a0a1e7aea6bf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d2b0b3a0bcb3a0b6bf92b7aaa6a0b3fcbcbbb6b6b9fcbcbbbafcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 2, 2017.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-21526 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>