alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (the Report) by Intervest Bancshares Corporation (the Company), the undersigned, as the principal executive and principal financial officers of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Lowell S. Dansker                                  
|Lowell S. Dansker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)                          
|March 2, 2010                                          



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John J. Arvonio                                    
|John J. Arvonio, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                          
|March 2, 2010                                          

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S

N O

. P D

- 1 3 6 0

- 1 8

J O S H U A J A C O B S , A p p e l l a n t

v .

T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S

O N T H E S T A T E ’ S P E T I T I O N F O R D I S C R E T I O N A R Y R E V I E W

F R O M T H E S I X T H C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

B O W I E C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m .

O P I N I O N

A p p e l l a n t w a s c o n v i c t e d o f a g g r a v a t e d s e x u a l a s s a u l t o f a c h i l d a n d , p u r s u a n t t o T e x a s

P e n a l C o d e § 1 2

. 4 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) ( A ) ( i ) a n d ( B ) ( v ) , s e n t e n c e d t o l i f e i n p r i s o n

. H e a p p e a l e d , a r g u i n g

t h a t t h e L o u i s i a n a c o n v i c t i o n u s e d t o e n h a n c e h i s p u n i s h m e n t w a s n o t “ s u b s t a n t i a l l y s i m i l a r ”

t o t h e e l e m e n t s o f a T e x a s o f f e n s e , a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e s t a t u t e

.J A C O B S

- 2

T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s a p p l i e d t h e t w o
- p r o n g e d t e s t f r o m P r u d h o l m v

. S t a t e , 3 3 3

S

. W

. 3 d 5 9 0 ( T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

. 2 0 1 1 ) , a n d A n d e r s o n v

. S t a t e , 3 9 4 S

. W

. 3 d 5 3 1 ( T e x

. C r i m

.

A p p

. 2 0 1 3 ) , t o c o n c l u d e t h a t t h e t w o s t a t u t e s w e r e n o t “ s u b s t a n t i a l l y s i m i l a r

. ” J a c o b s v

.

S t a t e , 5 6 5 S

. W

. 3 d 8 7 ( T e x

. A p p

. – T e x a r k a n a 2 0 1 8 , p e t

. g r a n t e d )

. I t t h e r e f o r e r e v e r s e d t h e

t r i a l c o u r t ’ s j u d g m e n t o n p u n i s h m e n t a n d r e m a n d e d f o r a n e w p u n i s h m e n t h e a r i n g

. I d

.

T h e S t a t e h a s f

i l e d a p e t i t i o n f

o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y r e v i e w o f t h i s d e c i s i o n

. W e r e c e n t l y

a b a n d o n e d t h e s e c o n d p r o n g o f t h e P r u d h o l m /

A n d e r s o n t e s t i n F i s k

v

. S t a t e , N o

. P D

- 1 3 6 0

-

1 7 , 2 0 1 9 T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

. L E X I S 5 4 1 ( T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

. J u n e 5 , 2 0 1 9 )

.

T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s i n t h e i n s t a n t c a s e d i d n o t h a v e t h e b e n e f i t o f o u r o p i n i o n i n

F i s k

. A c c o r d i n g l y , w e g r a n t t h e S t a t e ’ s p e t i t i o n f o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y r e v i e w , v a c a t e t h e
j u d g m e n t o f t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s , a n d r e m a n d t h i s c a s e t o t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s i n l i g h t o f

o u r o p i n i o n i n F i s k

.

D A T E D E L I V E R E D : J u l y 2 4 , 2 0 1 9

P U B L I S H
----

Exhibit 8 

Subsidiaries of the Company 

Following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company, ownershippercentages, and the jurisdictions of incorporation or organization of each asof March 20, 2007. Each subsidiary does business in its own name only. 

|                                  | Jurisdiction of    Incorporation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Subsidiary                            | or Organization                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|                                  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| MMM Exploraciones S.A. de C.V. (100%) | MexicoMetallica (Barbados) Inc. (100%)
BarbadosDe Re Holdings Inc. (100%)
British Virgin IslandsDesarrollos Metallica C.A. (100%)
Venezuela     (Inactive)
 Datawave Sciences Inc. (100%)
British Virgin IslandsMinera Metallica Ltda. (100%)
ChileMetallica Management Inc. (100%)
Colorado, U.S.A.Raleigh Mining International Ltd. (100%)
CanadaMinera San Xavier, S.A. de C.V. (100%)
MexicoServicios del Plata y Oro, S.A. de C.V.    (100%)
Mexico |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47788-47789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22231]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Release and Permanent Closure of the St. Clair Regional 
Airport, St. Clair, Missouri

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of release and permanent closure of the St. Clair 
Regional Airport, St. Clair, Missouri.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is publishing this notice of a pending action required 
by statute. Public Law 113-285 requires the FAA to release the City of 
St. Clair, Missouri, from all restrictions, conditions, and limitations 
on the use, encumbrance, conveyance, and closure of the St. Clair 
Regional Airport upon the satisfaction of certain conditions of the St. 
Clair Regional Airport (K39). On August 1, 2017, the City of St. Clair, 
Missouri provided written notice to the Federal Aviation Administration 
(FAA) of its intent to permanently close the St. Clair Regional Airport 
(K39), in St. Clair, Missouri. The City of St. Clair provided this 
notice to the FAA in excess of 30 days before the permanent closure. 
The FAA hereby publishes the City of St. Clair's notice of permanent 
closure of the St. Clair Regional Airport.

DATES: The permanent closure of the airport is applicable November 13, 
2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim A. Johnson, FAA Central Region 
Airports Division, Airports Division Director, 901 Locust, Room 364, 
Kansas City, Missouri 64106, (816) 329-2600

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Law 113-285 requires the FAA to 
release the City of St. Clair, Missouri, of restrictions, conditions, 
and limitations on the use, encumbrance, conveyance, and closure of the 
Airport upon the satisfaction of certain conditions of the St. Clair 
Regional Airport (K39). This non-towered, general aviation airport 
consist of approximately 79 acres and 6 based aircraft. Title 49 U.S.C. 
46319 states that a public agency (as defined in section 47102) may not 
permanently close an airport listed in the National Plan of Integrated 
Airport Systems under section 47103 without providing written notice to 
the Administrator of the FAA at least 30 days before the date of the 
closure. The FAA recognizes that the City of St. Clair met this 
requirement on August 1, 2017.


[[Page 47789]]


    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 6, 2017.
Jim A. Johnson,
Director, Airports Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 2017-22231 Filed 10-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Exhibit 32.1



Liquid Audio, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liquid Audio, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, James A. Mitarotonda, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 14, 2003



/s/ James A. MitarotondaJames A. MitarotondaCo-Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CLAUDE DILES,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-50467

D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00633-R

Central District of California, 

Los Angeles

ORDER

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

The parties have filed a joint motion for vacatur and remand for

resentencing. Because the record supports the parties’ contention that the district

court failed to explain the sentence imposed, we grant the parties’ motion and

remand for further proceedings. Upon remand, the court shall consider the parties’

sentencing arguments and explain the sentence in light of those arguments and the

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors.

To preserve the appearance of justice, we assign this case to a different judge

upon remand. We instruct the Clerk of the District Court for the Central District of

California to reassign this case to a different district court judge upon remand.

VACATED and REMANDED.

FILED

FEB 13 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
 of 2002, we the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
 Officer, respectively, of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (the
 Company), hereby certify that:
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|(1) | The Annual
 Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010,
 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                      
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                  

|                      |                                            
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------
|Date: March
 31, 2011 | /s/ Randall
 D. Sampson                    
|                      | Randall D.
 Sampson                        
|                      | President
 and Chief Executive Officer     
|                      | Canterbury
 Park Holding Corporation       
|                      |                                            
|Date: March
 31, 2011 | /s/ David C.
 Hansen                       
|                      | David C.
 Hansen                           
|                      | Vice
 President and Chief Financial Officer
|                      | Canterbury
 Park Holding Corporation       

---
#### Colby Zeigler-Bonds et al., Plaintiffs, v Structure Tone, Inc., et al., Defendants. Structure Tone, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Zwicker Electric Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[664 NYS2d 799]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered September 5, 1996, which denied the motion of third-party defendant subcontractor, plaintiff’s employer, for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint and the complaint, and granted third-party plaintiff general contractor’s cross motion for summary judgment on its cause of action for contractual indemnification, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the general contractor’s cross motion for summary judgment, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleges that she was injured on a construction site when she slipped on a greasy substance and fell down a flight of stairs while carrying a crate of coffee she was bringing to her co-workers. The purchase order retaining plaintiff’s employer, an electrical subcontractor, contained a clause under which it was to indemnify and hold harmless the general contractor and owner from all personal injury claims arising out of the work described in the purchase order, provided such *81claims were “caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Subcontractor, any sub-contractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder”. The subcontractor’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied insofar as it sought dismissal of the third-party complaint, there being issues of fact as to whether the subcontractor, or a party for which it was responsible under the indemnity clause, was negligent in allowing plaintiff to carry a crate loaded with coffee down the staircase. Also properly denied was that portion of the subcontractor’s motion as sought to dismiss plaintiffs complaint, which, to the extent it is based on Labor Law § 241 (6) and 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (d), need not have alleged that the owner or the general contractor had actual notice of the slippery condition *(see, Leon v J & M Peppe Realty Corp.,*190 AD2d 400, 408-409, citing *Tuohey v Gainsborough Studios,*183 AD2d 636). However, it was error to grant the general contractor’s cross motion for summary judgment on its contractual indemnity claim, since issues exist, first, as to whether its negligence, if any, in failing to properly maintain the stairways contributed to the accident, in which event the indemnity clause, which contemplates a complete rather than partial shifting of liability, would be unenforceable under General Obligations Law § 5-322.1 *(see, Itri Brick & Concrete Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,*89 NY2d 786), and, second, as to whether the negligence, if any, of the subcontractor or a party for whom it was responsible contributed to the accident, in the absence of which the indemnity clause would not apply *(see, Malecki v Wal-Mart Stores,*222 AD2d 1010). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Kathryn L. Hale, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AmeriVest Properties Inc (the registrant).;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: March 16, 2005                                      |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/KATHRYN L. HALEKathryn L. Hale
Chief Financial Officer |  | 



QuickLinks
#### Billy G. ASEMANI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN; The Supreme Leader of The Islamic Revolution Khamenei; The Islamic Revolutionary Court; The Ministry of Intelligence and Security; The Council of Guardians; The Ministry of Islamic Culture and Guidance; The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps; Ali Fallah Ian-Khuzestani, Head of the Revolutionary Guard Corps; Hoggatol-Islam Nayerri, Chief Judge of the Islamic Revolutionary Court, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-7398.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 17, 2011.

Decided: April 1, 2011.

Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*240PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for clarification and for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Asemani v. The Gov’t of Islamic Rep. of Iran,*No. 1:07-cv-00693-CMH-BRP (E.D.Va. Sept. 13, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligroup, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vikram Gulati, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

| (1)    | The Report fully complies   with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | The information contained   in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial   condition and results of operations of the Company.                                       |

| DATE:  March 28,   2007 | By:    | /s/ Vikram Gulati       |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                              |   |                         |
|                              |   | Vikram Gulati           |
|                              |   | Chief Executive Officer |