alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Skuli Thorvaldsson, certify that:

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Digital Creative Development Corporation for the quarter ending September 30, 2013 (the "Report"),
the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of his knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 19, 2013



/s/ Skuli Thorvaldsson

Skuli Thorvaldsson

Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 2, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-10996

____________

AVIALL SERVICES INC.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COOPER INDUSTRIES INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:97-CV-1926-D

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This case isremanded to the district court for reconsideration in light ofthe Supreme Court’s

recent decision in United States v. Atlantic Research Corp., ___ U.S. ___, 2007 WL 1661465 (U.S.

June 11, 2007) (No. 06-562).
<PAGE> 1


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PETERSON SULLIVAN P.L.L.C.
601 UNION STREET SUITE 2300  SEATTLE WA 98101  (206) 382-7777 FAX 382-7700
                                       CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



                        Independent Auditors' Consent
                        -----------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (No. 333-15831 and 333-15829) on Form S-8 of Ichor Corporation
and Subsidiary of our report dated February 20, 2001, relating to the
balance sheets of Ichor Corporation and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2000
and 1999, and the related statements of operations, shareholders' equity
and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, which
report appears in the Annual Report of Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, of Ichor Corporation and Subsidiary.



/s/ Peterson Sullivan P.L.L.C.
March 9, 2001
Seattle, Washington
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2954 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend the authority 

of the Secretary of Homeland Security to waive certain requirements 

under the visa waiver program for an additional 2 years. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2009 

Mr. QUIGLEY (for himself, Mr. LIPINSKI, and Mr. GUTIERREZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend 

the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security 

to waive certain requirements under the visa waiver program for an additional 2 years. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY. 

4 Section 217(c)(8)(A)(iii) of the Immigration and Na5 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(c)(8)(A)(iii)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘June 30, 2009’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘June 30, 2011’’; and 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2954 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘July 1, 2009’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘July 1, 2011’’. 

Æ 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
an abuse of discretion. Arnold v. Kip, 123 Nev. 410, 414, 168 P.3d 1050, 

1052 (2007). 

On appeal, appellant contends that he complied with both of 

NRCP 16.1(e)'s requirements. Specifically, he contends that a July 15, 

2010, phone conversation with respondents' counsel constituted the case 

conference and that a June 18, 2010, filing with the district court 

constituted his case conference report. As the district court pointed out, 

however, appellant's June 18 filing preceded the purported July 15 

conference, which made it impossible for the June 18 filing to satisfy the 

requirements of a case conference "report." See NRCP 16.1(c) (requiring a 

case conference report to summarize what was discussed at the case 

conference). 

Moreover, even accepting appellant's above-described 

argument, the district court properly determined that appellant had failed 

to comply with NRCP 16.1(e)'s timing requirements.' A review of the 

district court's order demonstrates that it considered the required factors 

in determining that dismissal was warranted, see Arnold, 123 Nev. at 415- 

16, 168 P.3d at 1053 (listing relevant factors), and we perceive no abuse of 

'Specifically, even if the July 15, 2010, phone call were considered to 

be a case conference, it took place more than 300 days after respondents' 

first appearance in August 2009. See NRCP 16.1(e)(1) (permitting 

dismissal when a case conference is not held within 180 days of a 

defendant's first appearance). Likewise, even if appellant's June 18, 2010, 

filing were considered to be a case conference report, it was filed nearly 

300 days after respondents' first appearance. See NRCP 16.1(e)(2) 

(permitting dismissal when a case conference report is not filed within 240 

days of a defendant's first appearance). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
discretion in the district court's decision. Id. at 414, 168 P.3d at 1052. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

Saitta 

J. 

J. 

cc: Seventh Judicial District Court Dept. 2 

Ronald W. Collins 

Attorney General/Carson City 

White Pine County Clerk 

2Appellant also challenges a prior order in which the district court 

denied appellant's motion for summary judgment. This motion was 

properly denied, as a genuine factual dispute existed with regard to 

whether appellant's due process rights had been violated. Wood v. 

Safeway, Inc., 121 Nev. 724, 729, 121 P.3d 1026, 1029 (2005) (indicating 

that summary judgment is appropriate only when "no genuine issue as to 

any material fact [remains] and. . . the moving party is entitled to a 

judgment as a matter of law" (quotation omitted)). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 16

- 00331

- CR Rogelio RINCON , Jr., Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR2445 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 13, 2016
DIS MISSED
On June 16 , 2016, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record within thirty days of the order. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 175

- 76 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order). Appellant’s counsel filed a response in which he states that he has reviewed the clerk’s record and “can find no right of appeal” for appellant; counsel concedes that we may dismiss the appeal for that reason. In light of the record presented, Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss04

- 16

- 00331

- CR

- 2

- this appeal. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). The record does not contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by t he prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that the defendant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2( d).
PER CURIAM Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,675
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,044)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,817
<PP&E>                                          12,148
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,723)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,652
<SALES>                                         15,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,442
<CGS>                                            3,958
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (60)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,364)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,364)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,364)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Payment Data Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
/s/ Michael R. LongMichael R. LongChief Executive Officer,Chief Financial Officerand Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,001,202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,642,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,433,723
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,703,594
<PP&E>                                       4,333,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,573,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,275,960
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          147,323
<PREFERRED>                                         15
<COMMON>                                         7,411
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,432,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,573,754
<SALES>                                     10,047,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,236,274
<CGS>                                        7,665,635
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,067,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,125,888
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                706,691
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   706,691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .097
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .060
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 13, 2017.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond*                     (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528. Comments can also be sent electronically to or                     *Comments.applications@rich.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *Howard Bancorp, Inc.,*                     Ellicott City, Maryland; to acquire voting shares of First Mariner Bank, Baltimore, Maryland.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 11, 2017.

Ann Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2017-22354 Filed 10-13-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          28,669
<SECURITIES>                                    12,248
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                       700
<INVENTORY>                                     23,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,610
<PP&E>                                          14,383
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,537
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           189
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,543
<SALES>                                        145,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               145,750
<CGS>                                           74,802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   110
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,815
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,015
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,015
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.33
        

</TABLE>
Back to Index





EXHIBIT 32.1





L Q CORPORATION, INC.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of L Q Corporation, Inc. (the  Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,  James A. Mitarotonda, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.





|Dated:     November 12, 2004 |                         
|---------------------------- | ------------------------
|                             |                         
|                             |                         
|                             | /s/ James A. Mitarotonda
|                             |                         
|                             | James A. Mitarotonda    
|                             | Chairman                




---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Allied Security Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”) for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Daniel Sobolewski,  Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|By: | /s/ Daniel Sobolewski           | 
|--- | ------------------------------- | 
|    | Daniel Sobolewski               | 
|    | Interim Chief Financial Officer | 
|    | (Principal Financial Officer)   | 
|    | January 10, 2019                | 





A signed original of this certification
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
----

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of  SE Global Equities Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Tim Leong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002*, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: November 12, 2004 | Signed "Tim Leong"      Tim Leong, Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to SE Global Equities Corp. and will be retained by SE Global EquitiesCorp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. 

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-QSB.

  |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|