alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
        THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN THE MARCH 31, 1999 QUARTERLY REPORT FILED ON
FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,040,269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,090,809
<PP&E>                                          29,388
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,140,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,478
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,567
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,046,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,140,118
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  277,771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (213,253)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (213,253)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
                                          


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3072 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3072

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   9810 Halls Ferry Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Coach Jodie 
                     Bailey Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. COACH JODIE BAILEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9810 Halls Ferry Road in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Coach Jodie Bailey Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Coach 
Jodie Bailey Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 9, 2009 

1215 

Order 

 

January 9, 2009 

137476 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137476 

 COA: 286480 

Grand Traverse CC: 07-010478 

ANTHONY CHARLES BENAK, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 HATHAWAY, J., not participating.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000928032
<NAME> AIM GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         324,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,473
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    135,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               535,264
<PP&E>                                         877,830
<DEPRECIATION>                                 293,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,154,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          878,836
<BONDS>                                      1,229,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,300
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,033,301
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,154,644
<SALES>                                      2,085,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,085,398
<CGS>                                        1,546,904
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,437,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               686,091
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             204,009
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (351,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (351,606)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (351,606)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001016794
<NAME> VYSYS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,876
<SECURITIES>                                     8,103
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,989
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,810)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,699
<PP&E>                                          12,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,920)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,097
<BONDS>                                            583
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,074
<SALES>                                         15,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,955
<CGS>                                            5,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   308
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,285)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,285)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,285)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.84)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2390

ASIF BARYALAI, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A77-246-624) Submitted: August 26, 2003 Decided: November 17, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michel M. Hadeed, Jr., BECKER, HADEED, KELLOGG & BERRY, P.C., Springfield, Virginia, for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, John C. Cunningham, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Asif Baryalai, a native and citizen of Afghanistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”). The order affirmed, without opinion, the immigration judge’s order denying Baryalai’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. The decision to grant or deny asylum relief is conclusive “unless manifestly contrary to the law and an abuse of discretion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(D) (2000). We conclude that the record supports the immigration judge’s conclusion that Baryalai failed to establish his eligibility for asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(a) (2003); Gonahasa v. INS , 181 F.3d 538, 541 (4th Cir. 1999). As the decision in this case is not manifestly contrary to law, we cannot grant the relief that Baryalai seeks. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[No. 67258-4-I.

Division One.

November 5, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Richard Allen Rasmussen, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 09-1-06581-7, J. Wesley Saint Clair, J, entered June 6, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Schindler, J.,

concurred in by Cox and Appelwick, JJ.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  Exhibit 10.28

Confidential portions of this document indicated by ***** have been omitted and
filed separately with the Commission

                                                     Alcoa Extruded
ALCOA                                                Construction
                                                           PRODUCTS

                                                     Alcoa Extrusions, Inc.
                                                     1907 Industrial Park Drive
                                                     Plant City, FL 33567 USA
                                                     Tel: 1 813 752 4117

October 27, 2000

Mr. Gary Ihrke
Vice President of Operations
Featherlite Trailers
PO Box 320
Cresco, IA 52136

Dear Gary,

This letter will serve as confirmation of our agreement finalized today. Alcoa
has purchased, with your authorization ***** pounds of aluminum for your
extrusion needs during the 1st Quarter of 2001. The extrusions will be purchased
and delivered at a base price of $***** per pound on solid shapes and $***** per
pound on hollow shapes. As we agreed, any side panels will require a $*****
adder. We also agreed to service the entire *****million pounds from our
Yankton, SD plant to complete our overall agreements for 2001.

I believe that gets us updated for the moment. Thank you for your business and
the opportunity to service Featherlite's extrusion requirements.

Yours truly,
/s/ Herb Grubbs
Herb Grubbs
Regional Sales Manager

CC:      Bob Roden - Plant city
         Dave Abbott - Yankton
         Jan Mauch - Yankton
         Craig Lepa - Featherlite
Exhibit 10.1




August 6, 2001


Scott Dickson
C/O Network Commerce Inc.


Re:  Promotion to CFO

Dear Scott:

We are  pleased to promote you to Chief  Financial  Officer  effective  July 30,
2001.  This letter  amends and restates the terms of your  employment at Network
Commerce Inc. (NWKC).

Your salary will be increased to $14,583.33 per month.  You may also be eligible
for Executive  Management bonuses from time to time, as set by the CEO and Board
of Director's.

Furthermore,  you will receive an option grant for an additional 50,000 options.
The first 1/3 will vest at the end of the  quarter  and the  remaining  2/3 will
vest equally over the next two quarters.

All other benefits will remain the same.

The  employment  opportunity  that we offer is of  indefinite  duration and will
continue as long as both you and Network Commerce consider it of mutual benefit.
Either you or Network Commerce is free to terminate the employment  relationship
at any time,  with or without  cause.  Any  statements  to the  contrary are not
authorized  and  may  not be  relied  upon.  No one  except  Network  Commerce's
President  has  authority to bind us to an  agreement  that  conflicts  with our
policy of  employment  at will,  and any such  agreement  must be in writing and
signed by Network Commerce's President.

By signing below you  acknowledge  that you are not relying on any promises that
are not set out in this letter in deciding to accept our offer.

Please  indicate  your  acceptance  of these terms of  employment by signing and
returning to me a copy of this letter.


                                            Sincerely,



                                            Dwayne Walker


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

---------------------------
Scott Dickson
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2974 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals eligible 

for veterans health benefits to contribute to health savings accounts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2009 

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Mr. BUYER, and Mr. BROWN of South Carolina) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals eligible for veterans health benefits to contribute 

to health savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALLOWANCE OF INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR 

4 VETERANS HEALTH BENEFITS TO CON5 TRIBUTE TO HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 223(c) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to defining 

8 eligible individual) is amended by adding at the end the 

9 following new subparagraph: 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2974 IH

1 ‘‘(C) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIVIDUALS ELI2 GIBLE FOR VETERANS HEALTH BENEFITS.— 

3 For purposes of subparagraph (A)(ii), an indi4 vidual shall not be treated as covered under a 

5 health plan described in such subparagraph 

6 merely because the individual receives periodic 

7 hospital care or medical services under any law 

8 administered by the Secretary of Veterans Af9 fairs.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

12 December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 6, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11019

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS PASCUAL ALONSO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CR-92-ALL

--------------------

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos Pascual

Alonso raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Beverly Harrington, Appellant, v Joseph L. Kern, Respondent.

[859 NYS2d 480]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered February 26, 2008, as denied her renewed motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs renewed motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability is granted.

“A rear-end collision with a stopped or stopping vehicle creates a prima facie case of negligence against the operator of the rear vehicle, thereby requiring that operator to rebut the inference of negligence by providing a nonnegligent explanation for the collision” *(Klopchin v Masri,*45 AD3d 737, 737 [2007]; *see e.g. Johnston v Spoto,*47 AD3d 888 [2008]; *Hakakian v McCabe,*38 AD3d 493 [2007]). Here, the plaintiff established her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence that she was stopped when the defendant collided with the rear of her vehicle.

In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact. At his deposition, the defendant testified that there was “stop and go” traffic near the scene of the accident. He further testified that he observed the plaintiffs vehicle come to “a normal stop in normal stop and go traffic” “[a] few seconds” before impact. The defendant applied his brakes when he was three to five feet behind the plaintiffs vehicle and was unable to come to a complete stop behind her. As an explanation for his failure to come to a complete stop, he stated, “It’s my opinion that there was a short stop.”

Since the defendant acknowledged that there was “stop and go” traffic, he cannot claim that the plaintiff’s stop was unanticipated *(see Hakakian v McCabe,*38 AD3d 493 [2007]; *Malone v Morillo,*6 AD3d 324 [2004]). He admitted that he saw the plaintiffs vehicle come to a complete stop a few seconds before impact. His opinion that the plaintiff made a “short stop” was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Johnston v Spoto,*47 AD3d 888, 889 [2008]). The defendant was obligated to take “appropriate precautions, including maintaining a safe distance” *(David v New York City Bd. of Educ.,*19 AD3d 639, 639 [2005]; *see Malone v Morillo,*6 AD3d 324 [2004]).

*474In view of the foregoing, the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment on the issue of liability. Miller, J.P, Dillon, Bal kin and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Douglas F. Garn, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.

Date: November 6, 2008



By:

/s/ Douglas F. GarnName:

Douglas F. GarnTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.5


 


Consulting Agreement


 


This agreement is made and will
become effective as of October 8, 2013 by and between the TearDroppers, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company") and
Rayna Austin (the "Consultant") to assist the Company in sales and marketing, administrative and any corporate tasks
as requested by the board or management.


 


The Company agrees to retain the
Consultant for $3,500 per month a period of six months followed by a month to month agreement("Consulting Term").


 


Company agrees to provide Consultant
access to the materials necessary to execute on the tasks requested. The Company also agrees to reimburse non-accountable expenses
of $500 per month in accordance with the Company's policies and procedures.


 


Either party may terminate this
Agreement at any time on 30 days notice. If the Company terminates this Agreement for other than "Cause", the Consultant
shall continue to receive the consulting fee. Each party shall be given 15 days to cure any breach.


 


This Agreement may be executed
in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.


 


 


THE TEARDROPPERS, INC. 


 


By:
 /s/ Raymond Gerrity                       


Raymond
Gerrity, President, CEO


 


 


By:  /s/
Rayna Austin                            


Rayna Austin, consultant
# I 

# , I ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Qwest Government Services, Inc.

d/b/a CenturyLink QGS Under ContractNo. GSOOT07NSD0040 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61852

Rocky J. Galloway, Esq.

Associate General Counsel William E. Brazis, Jr., Esq.

DISA General Counsel Colleen M. Eagan, Esq. Vera A. Strebel, Esq.

Trial Attorneys Defense Information Systems Agency ScottAirForce Base, IL ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: April 1, 2019 

# ./Isl:;:

... RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61852, Appeal ofQwest Government Services, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink QGS, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals