alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit101-DirectorCompensationDecember2014


EXHIBIT 10.1


Compensation of Non-Employee Directors of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation
Effective as of the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (the “Company”), the annual compensation payable to non-employee directors of the Company will be as set forth below:
Directors will receive an annual equity grant in the form of restricted stock with a fair market value on the date of grant of $155,000 (or $205,000 for the Chairman).
Directors will also receive an annual retainer of $75,000, payable in one of three ways, at their election:  (1) in cash, (2) in restricted stock, or (3) one half in cash and one half in restricted stock.
In addition, the Company will pay the following separate annual cash fees, payable quarterly in arrears in accordance with the same timetable that is used for paying the annual retainer fee, to certain directors as follows:  (1) $15,000 for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair, (2) $15,000 for the Compensation Committee Chair, (3) $15,000 for the Audit Committee Chair, (4) $15,000 for the Finance Committee Chair, (5) $25,000 for the Presiding Director and (6) $75,000 for the Chairman.
The Company will pay reasonable travel and out-of-pocket expenses incurred by non-employee directors in connection with attendance at meetings to transact business of the Company or attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof.
EX-4.1



 EXHIBIT 4.1 
 



 







 



 
 NOTICE: Signature must be guaranteed by a firm which is a member of a registered national stock exchange, or by a bank (other than a
savings bank), or a trust company. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations. UNIF GIFT MIN ACT
— Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) TEN COM — as tenants in common TEN ENT- as tenants by the entireties JT TEN — as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP
CODE. OR ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the within certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution
in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. ***FOR MEDALLION GUARANTEE USE
ONLY*** NOTICE OF SIGNATURE GUARANTEE: THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE FINANCIAL INSTITUTION WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE MEDALLION GUARANTEE PROGRAM PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17AD-15. APPROVED PROGRAMS INCLUDE: New York
Stock Exchange, Inc. Medallion Signature Program; Stock Exchanges Medallion Program; Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6968

ISMAIL MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Wayne Anthony Garrett,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RON ANGELONE, Director; ANDREW WINSTON, Chairman, Virginia Board of Corrections; DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS; BOARD OF CORRECTIONS OF THE

STATE OF VIRGINIA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-97-356-R)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ismail Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and from its order denying

his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Muhammad v. Angelone, No. CA-97-356-R (W.D. Va. June 20,

1997; July 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
File Na me: 09a0374n.06 NOT RECOMMENDED F OR FUL L -TEXT PUB L I CATI ON

No. 08-5458 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F O R T H E S IX T H C IR C U IT RO NA L D R . G AW, Ad

min istrator

of the Es tate o f C l i n tC
. G aw , d e c e a s e d ; A LE X IS FRANCI SCO, by

and throug h her mother , g uardia n and next friend, Robin Fra ncisco, Pla int if fs -A pp e lla nts , MEGAN NE WTON, I nte rv e no r- Pla int if

f- Ap pe lla nt,
v. CSX TRANSP ORTATI ON, I NC., Def endant- Appellee
. ON APPEALFROM THE UN I TE D ST AT ES D I STR I CT CO UR T F OR

TH E WE STE RN DI STRI CT OF KENTUCKY

/ B e fo re : MA RTI

N, SUH RH EI

NR I CH , a

nd GI B B ON S, Ci rc uit

Judg e s. BOYCE F. M ARTIN, JR., Circ uit Jud ge. Clint Gaw w as killed when the ca r he wa s driving collided with a tra in operated by CSX a s h e cr ossed ra ilroad trac ks bisecting a g rave l dr ive wa y . In th e pic ku

p tr uc k w ithhim was his g ir lf ri e nd , M e g an N e wt on , a

nd the ir six w e e k o ld son, Riley Gaw. Ms. N ewton and Riley Gaw wer e injured; Riley Gaw will likely never fully rec over. Gaw’ s survivors broug ht a diversity tort suit aga inst CSX, char g ing that the railroad was ne g lige nt under K entucky

law in fa iling to make the crossing s af er o r providing sufficie nt warning s. The dis trict cou rt grante d CSX ’s mot ion fo r s umm ary

jud g me nt, fi nd ingthat it ha d n ot b re a c he d it sNo. 08-5458

Gaw v. CSX Transportat ion, Inc. Pag e 2

“ lim ite d” state law d

uti e s. Having revie wed the briefs, the rec ord, and the lower court opinion, we f

ind that we have
no thi ng to a dd to the dis tr ic t c ourt ’s tho ro ug h d isp os iti on of thi s tr a g ic and

un fo rt un a te c a se . T hu s, for the rea sons stated by the l ower court, Gaw v. CSX Transport ation, Inc. , No. 3:05CV-220-MO, 20 08 U. S. D ist . L EX I S 23 13 1, 20 08 WL79 36 55 (W. D. Ky . M ar. 24 , 2 00 8) , w e AF F I RM.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Ladies and Gentleman:



In connection with the quarterly report of Featherlite, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jeffery A. Mason, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|               |  | 
|March 31, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Jeffery A. Mason   
|               |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



55
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00140

- CV

IN RE THOMAS FRACARO RELATOR

------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------ The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of
the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied. 2

PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, GARDNER
, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 30, 2013

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).

2 We note that there m ay still be another avenue of relief for relator. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West 2005 & Supp. 2012); Ex parte Thiles , 333 S.W.3d 148, 152

– 53 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011).
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128792 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 128792 COA: 253181 Macomb CC: 2 002-003704-FC DAVID ALAN BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ap ril 14, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Payment Data Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |     |                                                    
|---------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2007 | By: | /s/ Michael R. Long                                
|                       |     | Michael R. Long                                    
|                       |     | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         178,713
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  375,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               815,243
<PP&E>                                         77,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,956,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,071,114
<BONDS>                                        1,493,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,268,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,956,061
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               82,422
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               66,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                15,473
<INCOME-TAX>                                   8,923
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,550
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,550
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,624
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     76,172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,052
<PP&E>                                          13,925
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 212,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,313
<BONDS>                                         41,752
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   212,474
<SALES>                                        316,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               316,753
<CGS>                                          261,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  261,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,035
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,840
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,658
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,658
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.50

 

AMENDMENT TO THE SPX CORPORATION

1997 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION PLAN

 

SPX Corporation currently maintains the SPX Corporation 1997 Non-Employee Directors’ Compensation Plan (the “Plan”).  Pursuant to the powers of amendment reserved in Section 10 of the Plan, effective as of December 31, 2010, SPX Corporation hereby amends the Plan in the following manner:

 

1.  Section 2(b) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

 

“(b)         “Cash Payment” means the (i) cash amount payable to a Non-Employee Director pursuant to Section 8.1 below, (ii) the flat fee retainer payment payable to a Non-Employee Director for a calendar year, and (iii) effective for calendar years after December 31, 2008, any lead director fee payments that a Non-Employee Director may otherwise be entitled to.”

 

2.  Section 8.2 of the Plan is amended by deleting the first two sentences thereof.
Exhibit 21.1  List of Subsidiaries of the Company  NamePlace of IncorporationBeijing Asia Hongzhi Advertising Co., Ltd.Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Hongzhi Century Advertising Co., LtdPeoples Republic of ChinaShandong Hongzhi Communications and Career Advertising Co., Ltd.Peoples Republic of ChinaTibet Asia Culture Media Co., Ltd.Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Asia Qiangshi Media Advertising Co., Ltd.Peoples Republic of ChinaTibet Hongzhi Advertising Co., Ltd.Peoples Republic of China
**Exhibit 23.3**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-195009), and the related Prospectus of Empresa Nacional deElectricidad S.A. (“Endesa-Chile”) and of our reports dated April 20, 2015 and February 28, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Endesa Argentina S.A. and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F)for the year ended December 31, 2014. 

/s/ Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L. 

Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L. 

Buenos Aires,Argentina 

April 30, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                          745,181
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                916,371
<PP&E>                                                          128,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    5,729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                1,039,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         1,153,818
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                        225,700
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (757,507)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>(531,807)
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                3,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (420,394)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (420,394)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (420,394)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (.02)




</TABLE>
FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT
RUB E N ADO L FO CE RO N, AK A Rube n Ce r on-Casc o , Pe titione r,
v. E RIC H . H O L DE R JR., Attor ne y G e ne r al , Re sponde nt. No. 08-70836 Age n c y No. A073-969-493
O R DE R

K O Z I NSKI , C hie f Judge : Upon thevote of a

m a jority of nonre c use d

a c tive judge s, it is ordere d tha t this c a s e be re he ard e n ba n c pursua nt to Fe de ra l R

ule of Appe lla

te Proc e dure 35(a )
and C irc u it R

ule 35-3. The thre e -judge pa ne l opinion sha

ll not be c ite d a s pre c e de nt by

or to a ny c ourt of theNinth C irc uit. 

# FIL E D
SEP 19 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS
<PAGE>


                                   Exhibit 32


                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification

         I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that the accompanying Form 10-KSB of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. ("Bancorp") for
the annual period ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Bancorp.


By: /s/ Mary B. Halsey                                          March 22, 2005
    ------------------------------------------                -----------------
    Mary B. Halsey                                                  Date
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer and
    Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 23.4****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(Registration No. 333-10206) of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. ofour report dated April 15, 2005 with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Ocean Conversion (BVI) Ltd. as of December 31,2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income,stockholders’ equity, and cash flows, for the years then ended,which reports are incorporated by reference in the December 31,2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd./s/ KPMGGeorge Town, Cayman Islands
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40405 

Conference Calendar

__________________

MICHAEL THOMAS HUMPHREY,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BERNIE BUSH, Captain,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:94-CV-470

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 18, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Thomas Humphrey, a Texas state prisoner, filed a pro

se, in forma pauperis (IFP), 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against

Captain Bernie Bush for allegedly refusing to allow Humphrey to

call witnesses at a disciplinary hearing and for allegedly

assigning Humphrey to the wrong classification before demoting

him as punishment. Although this court recently barred Humprhrey

from filing any more suits in the federal district courts without
No. 95-40405

-2-

prior judicial approval, Humphrey v. Luna, 95-20204, slip op. at

7 (5th Cir. June 21, 1995) (unpublished), this instant action and

the resulting appeal were both filed before the imposition of the

sanction.

"An inmate has neither a protectible property nor liberty

interest in his custody classification." See Moody v. Baker, 857

F.2d 256, 257-58 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 985 (1988);

Wilson v. Budney, 976 F.2d 957, 958 (5th Cir. 1992) (same). 

Additionally, "[a] negligent act does not rise to a

constitutional violation." Moody, 857 F.2d at 258.

Bush, as a hearing officer, was not responsible for

determining any question regarding Humphrey's line class status,

and he properly relied on the major grading sheet, which showed

Humphrey as a Line Class II, instead of a Line Class I, which

Humphrey claimed he was. At best, Humphrey has set out a claim

of mere negligence against Bush, which does not amount to a

constitutional violation. See Moody, 857 F.2d at 258.

Humphrey was advised of his right to call and question

witnesses, but declined to exercise his right. On appeal,

Humphrey admits that neither he nor his counsel substitute

requested any witnesses. The magistrate judge properly dismissed

Humphrey's claims as frivolous.

AFFIRMED.