alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
Main Place Real Estate Investment Trust	        					               Exhibit 12
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in Thousands)
<CAPTION>


		                                          Year        		Year 		      Year
                                          		Ended		       Ended		      Ended
                                         December 31,  December 31, December 31,
                                           		1997 		       1996 		      1995
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                      <C>            <C>          <C>
Income before taxes....................  $ 1,293,866    $ 216,709    $  48,070

Fixed charges:
     Interest expense .................	     595,818      255,318      145,822
     Amortization of debt discount and
       appropriate issuance costs......		      3,713        2,856          983
                                         -------------------------------------
        Total fixed charges............		    599,531      258,174      146,805

Earnings before fixed charges..........		$ 1,893,397    $ 474,883    $ 194,875
																																         =====================================
Fixed charges..........................		$   599,531    $ 258,174    $ 146,805
																																         =====================================
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.....		       3.16 		      1.84 		      1.33
																																         =====================================
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                       DIGITAL DESCRIPTOR SYSTEMS, INC.
               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Anthony Shupin, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company fully complies with
            the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Digital
Descriptor Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

Date:  April 15, 2005


/s/ Anthony Shupin
--------------------------------------
Anthony Shupin
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Palisades Tickets, Inc., Appellant, v Gerald Daffner, Respondent.

[989 NYS2d 25]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered July 16, 2013, which granted defendant’s motion to *620dismiss the complaint sounding in fraud, fraudulent concealment, and conspiracy on the ground that plaintiff lacked capacity to sue pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1312 (a), unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to grant plaintiff leave to replead, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff Palisades Tickets, Inc. commenced this action against defendant Gerald Daffner, an attorney admitted to practice in New York State, alleging that he conspired with his clients, judgment debtors on an underlying judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff, to use his escrow accounts to conceal the debtors’ assets so as to impede plaintiff from collecting on the judgment. While it is undisputed that plaintiff is a foreign corporation and is unauthorized to do business in New York State, defendant has not established entitlement to dismissal of the action pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1312 (a), which bars suits by foreign corporations that do business in New York without authorization. Even if the underlying judgment arose from a business transaction with the judgment debtors, who are New York residents and corporations, evidence of a single transaction is insufficient to sustain defendant’s burden of showing that the corporation engaged in “systematic and regular” business activities in this state *(see Acno-Tec Ltd. v Wall St. Suites, L.L.C.,*24 AD3d 392, 393 [1st Dept 2005]; *Nick v Greenfield,*299 AD2d 172, 173 [1st Dept 2002]).

Defendant argues as an alternative ground for affirmance that the action is barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel and that plaintiff failed to plead fraud with sufficient particularity. The action is not barred by collateral estoppel since the issue of whether defendant engaged in fraudulent conduct or other improprieties was not necessarily decided in the prior action *(see Ryan v New York Tel. Co.,*62 NY2d 494, 500 [1984]). The complaint should nevertheless be dismissed to the extent it alleges fraud and fraudulent concealment since it does not allege that there was a misrepresentation or that any such misrepresentation induced justifiable reliance by plaintiff *(see Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney,*88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996]), nor does it allege that defendant owed a duty to disclose information to plaintiff *(see P.T. Bank Cent. Asia, N.Y. Branch v ABN AMRO Bank N.V.,*301 AD2d 373, 376 [1st Dept 2003]). Leave to replead is granted to the extent the complaint alleges that defendant knowingly assisted his clients’ fraudulent concealment or conveyance of assets to allege with greater specificity the elements of this cause of action *(see Syllman v Calleo Dev. Corp.,*290 AD2d 209 [1st Dept 2002]).

Concur—Tom, J.E, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels, Feinman and Gische, JJ.
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
AmeriVest Properties Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (Nos. 333-112210, No. 333-101713, and No. 333-44210) on
Form S-3 and in the registration statements (No. 333-101803, No. 333-101802, and No. 333-116239) on
Form S-8 of AmeriVest Properties Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 16, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of AmeriVest
Properties Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and all related financial statement schedules, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report
on Form 10-K of AmeriVest Properties Inc.

| |  | /s/ KPMG LLP
| |  | ------------

Denver,
Colorado
March 16, 2005



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Altair  Nanotechnologies  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Alan J. Gotcher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Alan J. Gotcher
----------------------------
Alan J. Gotcher
Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2841 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2841

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
   enhanced charitable deduction for contributions of food inventory.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2009

Mr. Space (for himself and Mr. Boccieri) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
   enhanced charitable deduction for contributions of food inventory.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Promoting Charitable Actions Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. ENHANCED CHARITABLE DEDUCTION FOR CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOOD 
              INVENTORY MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (C) of section 170(e)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking clause (iv).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to contributions made after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
II 

Calendar No. 203 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2760 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 4, 2009 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1615 North Wilcox Avenue in Los Angeles, 

California, as the ‘‘Johnny Grant Hollywood Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHNNY GRANT HOLLYWOOD POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1615 North Wilcox Avenue in 

7 Los Angeles, California, shall be known and designated 

8 as the ‘‘Johnny Grant Hollywood Post Office Building’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2760 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Johnny Grant Holly5 wood Post Office Building’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 203 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2760 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostHollywood Post Office Building’’. in Los Angeles, California, as the ‘‘Johnny Grant al Service located at 1615 North Wilcox Avenue 

NOVEMBER 4, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# United States Court of Appeals
**f or the Fifth Circuit** 

___________

No. 24

- 50149

___________
**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

**State of Texas; Greg Abbott,** in his official capacity as Governor of Texas **; Texas Department of Public Safety; Steven C. McCraw,**  in his official capacity as Director of Texas D epartment of Public Safety **,**
Defendants

— Appellants ,

**____________________________**
**Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center; American Gateways; County of El Paso, Texas,** 

Plaintiffs —Appellees ,

versus

**Steven C. McCraw,** in his official capacity as Director of the State of Texas Department of Public Safety **; Bill D. Hicks,** in his official capacity as District Attorney for the 34th District **,**
Defendants

— Appellants

. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 19, 2024
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 24-50149 Document: 121-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/19/2024No. 24

- 50149

2 ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for th e Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:24

- CV

- 8 USDC No. 1:23

- CV

- 1537

______________________________

B efore **Richman,** Chief Judge **, Oldham,** and **Ramirez,** Circuit Judges.

**Per Curiam:**
Oral argument is scheduled on March 20, 2024, to consider the Appellants’ Motion to Stay Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal. A majority of the panel has concluded that the administrative stay entered by a motions panel on March 2, 2024, should be lifted. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the administrative sta y of this appeal previously entered by a motions panel on March 2, 2024, is DISSOLVED

. Case: 24-50149 Document: 121-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/19/2024No. 24

- 50149

3 **Andrew S. Oldham** , Circuit Judge , dissenting:
A preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy that alters the

status quo. See Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc. , 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008);
Nken v. Holder , 556 U.S. 418, 429 (2009). A stay preserves the status quo while an appellate court reviews th e lawfulness of that alteration. Nken , 556 U.S. at 429. Earlier today, the Supreme Court of the United States restored an administrative stay so our panel could review the State’s request for emergency relief under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 8. Se e United

States v. Texas , No. 23A814 (U.S. Mar. 19, 2024) (Mem.). I would leave that stay in place pending tomorrow’s oral argument on the question. Case: 24-50149 Document: 121-1 Page: 3 Date Filed: 03/19/2024
#### Sandra Lourdes ROMAN-ANGUIANO, a.k.a. Sandra L. Roman, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-71827.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 15, 2011.

Sandra Lourdes Roman-Anguiano, Ontario, CA, pro se.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Eric Warren Marsteller, Esquire, Trial, OIL, Daniel Eric Goldman, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Sandra Lourdes Roman-Anguiano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *723*Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Roman-Anguiano’s second motion to reopen, which was filed over 90 days after the BIA’s final order, as untimely and number-barred. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). To the extent that Roman-Anguiano challenges the BIA’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), we lack jurisdiction to review such a challenge. *See Ekimian v. INS,*303 F.3d 1153, 1159-60 (9th Cir.2002). If we had jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision, we would find no abuse of discretion.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DENISE BATTLES, DOC #R62614, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3929

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed July 6, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Chris Helinger, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, CRENSHAW, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Raúl Alarcón, Jr.Name:
    
    Raúl Alarcón, Jr.Title:
    
    Chief Executive Officer and President
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 1.2

[INDUSTRY CANADA LOGO]                  Industrie Canada

CERTIFICATE                                    CERTIFICAT
OF CONTINUANCE                                 DE PROROGATION

CANADA BUSINESS                                LOI CANADIENNE SUR
CORPORATIONS ACT                               LES SOCIETES PAR ACTIONS

METALLICA RESOURCES INC.                             600473-3

Name of corporation-Denomination              Corporation number-Numero
de la societe                                 de la societe

I hereby certify that the above-named         Je certifie que la societe
corporation was continued under section       susmentionnee a ete prorogee en
187 of the Canada Business Corporations       vertu de l'article 187 de la Loi
Act, as set out in the attached articles      canadienne sur les societes par
of continuance.                               actions, tel qu'il est indique
                                              dans les clauses de prorogation
                                              ci-jointes.

/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]                               July 16, 2002 / le 16 juillet 2002
--------------------
Director - Directeur                          Date of Continuance - Date de la
                                              prorogation

[CANADA LOGO]
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Michael J. Lambert, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2005, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software,
Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  |                                               
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    MICHAEL J.
LAMBERT
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                     |  | Michael J. Lambert                            
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                    |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2

**Certification of Vice President, Finance and Operations Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

*            *I, M. Brinkley Morse,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.

|  
By:

/s/    M. BRINKLEY MORSE

 
 
 
Name:

**M. Brinkley Morse**

 
Title:

**Vice President,**

 
 
**Finance and Operations** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2804 

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to require 12-month continuous 

coverage under the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2009 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to require 

12-month continuous coverage under the State Children’s 

Health Insurance Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Continuous 

5 Coverage under SCHIP Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF 12-MONTH CONTINUOUS COV7 ERAGE UNDER SCHIP. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2102(b) of the Social Se9 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1397bb(b)) is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following new paragraph: 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2804 IH

1 ‘‘(6) REQUIREMENT FOR 12-MONTH CONTIN2 UOUS ELIGIBILITY.—In the case of a State child 

3 health plan that provides child health assistance 

4 under this title through a means other than de5 scribed in section 2101(a)(2), the plan shall provide 

6 for implementation under this title of the 12-month 

7 continuous eligibility option described in section 

8 1902(e)(12) for targeted low-income children whose 

9 family income is below 200 percent of the poverty 

10 line.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) shall apply to determinations (and redeter13 minations) of eligibility made on or after October 1, 2009. 

Æ 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
II 

Calendar No. 151 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2938 

[Report No. 111–68] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AUGUST 4, 2009 

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12187, the 

8 Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2938 RS

1 project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with 

2 the good faith, due diligence, and public interest require3 ments of that section and the Commission’s procedures 

4 under that section, extend the time period during which 

5 the licensee is required to commence the construction of 

6 the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 

7 the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued 

8 by the Commission. 

9 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the 

10 period required for commencement of construction of the 

11 project described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the 

12 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission may 

13 reinstate the license effective as of the date of its expira14 tion and the first extension authorized under subsection 

15 (a) shall take effect on the date of such expiration. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 151 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2938 

[Report No. 111–68] 

AN ACT 

To extend the deadline for commencement of 

construction of a hydroelectric project. 

AUGUST 4, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS