alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 98-7658 JAMES MCLAUGHLIN, a/k/a Mac, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-94-47, CA-98-953-2) Submitted: April 27, 1999 Decided: May 25, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELJames McLaughlin, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: McLaughlin appeals the district court's order dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) as barred by the one-year limitation period imposed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (effective Apr. 24, 1996). B ecause we find that J ohnson's § 2255 motion was timely filed, we v acate the district court's order and remand for further proceedings. The United States Supreme Court denied McLaughlin's petition for a writ of certiorari on October 6, 1997, and McLaughlin mailed his § 2255 motion from prison on August 13, 1998. B ecause McLaughlin filed* his § 2255 motion within a year after the Supreme Court denied his petition for a writ of certiorari, we conclude that the district court erred in dismissing McLaughlin's motion as untimely filed. See28 U.S.C.A. § 2255; United States v. Simmonds , 111 F.3d 737, 744 (10th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we grant a certificate of appealability on this issue, vacate the district court's order denying McLaughlin's § 2255 motion, and remand for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. VACATED AND REMANDED

_________________________________________________________________ *See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001088146
<NAME>                          Susquehanna Media Co.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,663)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,829
<PP&E>                                         233,016
<DEPRECIATION>                               (102,359)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 539,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,411
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,050
<COMMON>                                         1,100
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   539,899
<SALES>                                        150,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,393
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (3)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,227
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,876
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,351
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,773
<EPS-BASIC>                                      10.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.48



</TABLE>
#### Maria Dolores Domino, Respondent, v Geronimo Domino, Appellant.

[857 NYS2d 920]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered November 27, 2006, as, in effect, granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was, in effect, to vacate, inter alia, those portions of a prior order of the same court entered November 12, 2004, upon the plaintiffs default in appearing, which permitted the defendant to bid to purchase the plaintiffs share of the marital home and valued the defendant’s share of the parties’ business, known as Domino Ambulette Service, at $51,376.

*456Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not err in granting that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was, in effect, to vacate, inter alia, certain portions of the order entered November 12, 2004 *(see Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp.,*100 NY2d 62, 68 [2003]; *Lounsbury v Kiehl,*255 AD2d 774, 775 [1998]; *cf. Long Is. Sav. Bank v Sutphen,*222 AD2d 660 [1995]; see *also Pauk v Pauk,*277 AD2d 296, 297 [2000]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.E, Santucci, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,894
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             159
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,186
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        601
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          20,375
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         84,038
<ALLOWANCE>                                        968
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,409
<DEPOSITS>                                     106,018
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                859
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           810
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 116,409
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,118
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,141
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,259
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,417
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,579
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,680
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      146
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               4,165
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    913
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         642
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       642
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.45
<LOANS-NON>                                        272
<LOANS-PAST>                                         7
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   864
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       45
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  968
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               968
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**KALI A. SMITH,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 259 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 29th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Al lowance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SE Global Equities
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Toby Chu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
  Partnership.


|Date: August 14, 2003 | /s/ Toby Chu
    _______________________
    Toby Chu, Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Richard D. HURLES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN *, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 08-99032.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 16, 2014.

Michael Aaron Harwin, Esquire, Law Offices of Michael A. Harwin, PC, Denise Irene Young, Denise I. Young, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Kent Ernest Cattani, Chief Counsel, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: HARRY PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 Charles L. Ryan is substituted for his predecessor, Dora B. Schriro, as Director for the Arizona Department of Corrections. Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

ORDER

The warden’s Motion for Ruling on RespondenL-Appellees’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc, filed February 1, 2013, is DENIED. The parties may file a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc with respect to the opinion filed together with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46341-46342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21314]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 10152]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: Exhibition of Paintings by Women Artists 
in Paris Between 1850 and 1900

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the traveling 
exhibition identified under the titles below, imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Denver Art Museum, Denver, 
Colorado, under the title ``Her Paris: Women Artists in the Age of 
Impressionism,'' from on or about October 22, 2017, until on or about 
January 14, 2018; at the Speed Art Museum, Louisville, Kentucky, under 
the title ``Women Artists in the Age of Impressionism,'' from on or 
about February 17, 2018, until on or about May 13, 2018; at The 
Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, Williamstown, Massachusetts, 
under the title ``Women Artists in Paris 1850-1900,'' from on or about 
June 9, 2018, until on or about September 3, 2018; and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office of the 
Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0b3a5a3b4a9afaef2f4f5f980b3b4a1b4a5eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80f3e5e3f4e9efeeb2b4b5b9c0f3f4e1f4e5aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. Department 
of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat.

[[Page 46342]]

985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs 
Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 
U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 
1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as 
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 11, 2015). I 
have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in 
the Federal Register.

Alyson Grunder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-21314 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of CyberGuard Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Matte, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Michael D. Matte   
|-----------------------
|                       
|Michael D. Matte       
|Chief Financial Officer
|October 23, 2003       



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cyberguard Corporation and will be retained by Cyberguard Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                    ----------------------------------------
                    

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF SNYDER OIL CORPORATION:

          We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Snyder
Oil Corporation (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31,
1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

          We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

          In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Snyder Oil
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.



                                                   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Worth, Texas,
February 10, 1999
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





We,
      Don
      H. Barden, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jon S. Bennett,
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Majestic Star Casino, LLC,
      The
      Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp., and Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.
      II,
      (collectively, the "Registrant") certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
            The
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter
                ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), fully complies with the
                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange
                Act of
                1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.





Dated: November 14,
      2006





*/s/
      Don H. Barden*


Don
      H.
      Barden


Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer


The
      Majestic Star Casino, LLC


The
      Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp. and


Majestic
      Star Casino Capital Corp. II





*/s/
      Jon S. Bennett*


Jon
      S.
      Bennett


Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer


The
      Majestic Star Casino, LLC


The
      Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp. and


Majestic
      Star Casino Capital Corp. II
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MAXIANA SAINTFLEUR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-0020

[December 6, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502017CF002395AMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. 

Napodano, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horseshoe Gaming Holding
Corp. ("the Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Kirk C. Saylor, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.


                                    By: /s/ Kirk C. Saylor
                                        --------------------------------------
                                    Kirk C. Saylor, Chief Financial Officer
                                    November 14, 2002
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46974-46975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21678]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-2577-000]

Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing 
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization; York Haven 
Power Company, LLC

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
York Haven Power Company, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.

[[Page 46975]]

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 23, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: October 2, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-21678 Filed 10-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```