alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

LIVESTAR ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Livestar Entertainment Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Ray Hawkins, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of1934; and (2)     The information contained in the Report
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ray HawkinsRay Hawkins
Principal Executive OfficerNovember 19, 2003

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Livestar Entertainment Group, Inc. and will be retained by Livestar Entertainment Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 19-14759

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket Nos. 2:16-cv-00506-MHT-SRW,

2:02-cr-00201-MHT-SRW-1

RENARD CORTEZ MURRAY, 

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Respondent-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Alabama

________________________

(May 1, 2020)

Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Renard Murray appeals the denial of his motion to vacate his sentence, 28 

U.S.C. § 2255, for aiding and abetting another to possess a firearm during a bank 

Case: 19-14759 Date Filed: 05/01/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2

robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). The district court granted a certificate of appealability 

for whether Murray’s conviction based on a guilty plea is constitutional in the light 

of the decisions in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), and Johnson v. 

United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). Murray contends that the predicate offense 

to which he pleaded guilty, aiding and abetting an armed bank robbery, is not a 

“crime of violence” under § 924(c)(3). Our precedents hold otherwise. We affirm.

In an appeal of a denial of a motion to vacate, we review questions of law de 

novo and factual findings for clear error. Lynn v. United States, 365 F.3d 1225, 

1232 (11th Cir. 2004). We may affirm for any reason supported by the record. 

Castillo v. United States, 816 F.3d 1300, 1303 (11th Cir. 2016).

As Murray concedes, our precedents control this appeal. Although in Davis

the Supreme Court held that the residual clause of section 924(c)(3)(B) is 

unconstitutionally vague, 139 S. Ct. at 2323, 2336, our precedents establish that 

aiding and abetting a Hobbs Act robbery is categorically a crime of violence under 

the elements clause of section 924(c)(3)(A). In re Sams, 830 F.3d 1234, 1239 (11th 

Cir. 2016); In re Colon, 826 F.3d 1301, 1305 (11th Cir. 2016). So we affirm the 

denial of Murray’s motion to vacate. 

AFFIRMED. 

Case: 19-14759 Date Filed: 05/01/2020 Page: 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6535

FRANK M. CONNELL, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-806) Submitted: July 21, 2004 Decided: August 18, 2004 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank M. Connell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Frank M. Connell, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely his motion for relief from judgment, filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). The certificate of appealability requirement applies to an order denying a motion under Rule 60(b). See Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Connell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Henry Juszczak et al., Respondents, v Noco Motor Fuels, Inc., Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 88]

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The proof submitted in support of the motion fails to establish as a matter of law that defendant did not have actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition allegedly existing in the area of the gasoline pumps where plaintiff Henry Juszczak fell *(see, Morgan v Genrich,*239 AD2d 919; *Panzarella v Multiple Parking Servs.*[appeal No. 1], 238 AD2d 907; *Keeton v Cardinal O’Hara High School,*233 AD2d 839). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, No-taro, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2877 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2877

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 76 Brookside Avenue in Chester, New York, as the ``1st Lieutenant 
                       Louis Allen Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2009

    Mr. Hall of New York (for himself, Mr. Rangel, Mr. McHugh, Ms. 
   Slaughter, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Hinchey, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Engel, Mr. 
 Murphy of New York, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Arcuri, Mr. Bishop of New York, 
Ms. Clarke, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Higgins, Mr. Israel, Mr. King of New York, 
Mr. Lee of New York, Mr. Maffei, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Massa, Mrs. McCarthy 
  of New York, Mr. McMahon, Mr. Meeks of New York, Mr. Nadler of New 
York, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Towns, and Mr. Weiner) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 76 Brookside Avenue in Chester, New York, as the ``1st Lieutenant 
                       Louis Allen Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1ST LIEUTENANT LOUIS ALLEN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 76 Brookside Avenue in Chester, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``1st Lieutenant Louis Allen Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``1st 
Lieutenant Louis Allen Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 10.55**July 18, 2005Billy BankerDear Billy,**RE: Employee Share Incentive Plan and Employee Share Option Plan**In accordance with the Employee Share Incentive Plan (“the Preference Share Plan”), you are herebyadvised that the Grant Date is July 14, 2005 for benefits you have accrued during the year ended 31December 2004.Accordingly you are granted 105 Preference Shares in the Company. You have the option to purchasean equal number of Preference Shares at a price of US$18.31 or CI$15.26 each, which has beencalculated in accordance to the terms of the Preference Share Plan. If you intend to exercise thisoption, then payment must be received in full no later than the close of business on **August 15,2005**.As a member of the Employee Share Option Plan (“the Option Plan”), you will also be granted, as ofJuly 14, 2005, the option to purchase 525 Ordinary Shares in the Company. These options areexercisable in accordance to the terms of the Option Plan. You furthermore have the opportunity toobtain an equal amount of options to purchase Ordinary Shares of the Company, in accordance to theterms of the Option Plan, if you exercise your right to purchase the above additional PreferenceShares before **August 15, 2005**.Your continued dedication and hard work have contributed to another successful year forConsolidated Water, and I look forward to a very bright future.Yours sincerely,
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leonard Ludwigsen, Appellant.

[986 NYS2d 860]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 5, 2008 *{People v Ludwigsen,*48 AD3d 484 [2008]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 19, 2005.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Balkin, J.E, Dickerson, Chambers and Hall, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21689]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Specification for Postal Security Devices and Indicia 
(Postmarks); Correction

AGENCY: National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human 
Services.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services, National 
Institutes of Health published a document in the Federal Register on 
October 2, 2017, contemplating the modification of grant of an 
Exclusive Patent License to EncepHeal Therapeutics, Inc., located in 
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, to practice the inventions embodied in 
the patent applications listed in the Supplementary Information section 
of this notice. The document contained an incorrect date of signature.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Rodriguez, 240-276-6661.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of October 2, 2017, in FR Doc. 2017-21048, 
on page 45866, in the second column, correct the ``Dated: September 22, 
2107'' caption to read: ``Dated: September 22, 2017''.

    Dated: October 3, 2017.
Richard U. Rodriguez,
Associate Director, Technology Transfer Center, National Cancer 
Institute.
[FR Doc. 2017-21689 Filed 10-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     60,347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,809
<PP&E>                                          14,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,366
<BONDS>                                         41,529
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,997
<SALES>                                        492,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               492,536
<CGS>                                          405,145
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  405,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,620
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,649
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,462
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,462
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Altair  Nanotechnologies  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Edward Dickinson,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Edward Dickinson
--------------------------
Edward H. Dickinson
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2004
----

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quaterly Report of SE Global Equities Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, TobyChu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Partnership.

 

| Date: May 16, 2005 | /s/ Toby Chu      _______________________      Toby Chu, Chief Executive Officer |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Alderwoods Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fifty three weeks ended January 3, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.


Dated: March 16, 2004.



                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Paul A. Houston
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   and Director
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)



                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Kenneth A. Sloan
                                                   Executive Vice President,
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)



         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15324 and #15325; Florida Disaster Number FL-00131]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Florida (FEMA-4337-DR), dated 09/21/2017.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Irma.                    

*Incident Period:*                         09/04/2017 and continuing.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 10/05/2017.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/20/2017.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/21/2018.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of FLORIDA, dated 09/21/2017, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Alachua, Bradford, Brevard, Desoto, Dixie, Gilchrist, Hardee, Highlands, Indian River, Jefferson, Lafayette, Lake, Leon, Levy, Marion, Martin, Okeechobee, Orange, Osceola, Saint Lucie, Seminole, Sumter, Taylor, Union, Volusia, Wakulla.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2017-22331 Filed 10-13-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 23.01



CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP



We have issued our report dated July 31, 2003, accompanying the consolidated financial statements of Cyberguard Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year
ended June 30, 2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Cybergurad Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No.s 333-87347, 33-88446, 33-88448, 333-50042, 333-58262,
333-73852).



|/s/  Grant Thornton LLP 
|------------------------
|                        
|Fort Lauderdale, Florida
|August 28, 2003
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligroup, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vikram Gulati, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

| (1)    | The Report fully complies   with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | The information contained   in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial   condition and results of operations of the Company.                                       |

| DATE:  May 15,   2007 | By:    | /s/ Vikram Gulati       |
|---------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                            |   |                         |
|                            |   | Vikram Gulati           |
|                            |   | Chief Executive Officer |