alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TRU.11.1.2014-Ex10.5






Exhibit 10.5
                                                          
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
TOYS “R” US, INC.
2010 INCENTIVE PLAN
This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”) to the Toys “R” Us, Inc. 2010 Incentive Plan, as previously amended effective as of November 14, 2013 (the “Plan”), shall become effective as of September 4, 2014.  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Plan.


		
	1.
	The following definition of “2005 Plan” is added to the end of Section 2.1 of the Plan:




“(qq)  ‘2005 Plan’ means the Company’s Amended and Restated 2005 Management Equity Plan, as last amended on March 12, 2013.”


		
	2.
	The first sentence of Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:




“Subject to adjustment as provided in Sections 5.2 and 14.1, the aggregate number of Shares reserved and available for issuance pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan shall be equal to the sum of the below clauses (i) through (iii):


		
	(i)
	3,750,000 Shares; plus


		
	(ii)
	the number of Shares available for issuance under the 2005 Plan as of July 17, 2014; plus











		
	(iii)
	any Shares that, after July 17, 2014, would otherwise have reverted back to the 2005 Plan and again become available for issuance under the 2005 Plan pursuant to Section 3.2 thereof.”


		
	3.
	The following sentence is hereby added to the end of Section 3.2 of the Plan:




“The Plan will not in any way affect outstanding awards that were granted under the 2005 Plan and no new awards may be granted under the 2005 Plan as of July 17, 2014.”


		
	4.
	Continuing Force and Effect.  The Plan, as modified by the terms of this Amendment, shall continue in full force and effect from and after the date of the adoption of this Amendment set forth above.






I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Toys “R” Us, Inc. as of July 17, 2014.


Executed on this 4th day of September, 2014.






	
			
	 
	/s/ David J. Schwartz
	 

	 
	David J. Schwartz
	 

	 
	Corporate Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mad Catz Interactive, Inc.
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                          
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  | /s/ CYRIL TALBOT III                     
|                       |  | Cyril Talbot III, Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certifications are being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          92,484
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,881
<INVENTORY>                                     59,104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               250,961
<PP&E>                                          57,230
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 276,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,331
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                     202,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   276,924
<SALES>                                        258,755
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               299,772
<CGS>                                          175,645
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               101,124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   683
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  92
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,726)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,227
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,953)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,953)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21772]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

[Docket Number USTR-2017-0018]


Request for Comments Concerning an Environmental Review of the 
Proposed Renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement; 
Correction

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Trade Policy Staff Committee (TPSC) published a document 
in the Federal Register of September 26, 2017, requesting comments that 
will assist the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) 
in an environmental review relating to the renegotiation of the North 
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a free trade agreement between 
the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The document contained an 
incorrect docket number. The correct docket number is Docket Number 
USTR-2017-0018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions about submission of 
comments to Yvonne Jamison at (202) 395-3475. Direct substantive 
questions to Sarah Stewart at (202) 395-7320.
    Correction: In the Federal Register of September 26, 2017, in FR 
Doc. 2017-20526, 82 FR 44868-69, correct the docket number wherever it 
appears to read Docket Number USTR-2017-0018.

Edward Gresser,
Chair, Trade Policy Staff Committee, Office of the United States Trade 
Representative.
[FR Doc. 2017-21772 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3290-F8-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN THE
REGISTRANT'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  9/30/99 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001016439
<NAME>                        Intelligroup, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        43,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               43,315
<CGS>                                          27,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  38,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (176)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,381
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,623
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,758
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,758
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .24 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .24 <F2>
<FN>
<F1>      This amount represents Basic Earnings per Share in accordance with the
          requirements of Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards No. 128 -
          "Earnings per Share".

<F2>      This amount  represents  Diluted Earnings per Share in accordance with
          the  requirements of Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards No.
          128 - "Earnings per Share".
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.02


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CyberGuard Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael D. Matte, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Michael D. Matte

Michael D. Matte
Chief Financial Officer
September 27, 2002
EXHIBIT 10(f)

                                AIM GROUP, INC.
                       2001 West Sample Road, Suite 300
                            Pompano Beach, FL 33064


April 10, 1997


[Name of Note Holder]


                  Re:  Amendment to Series A 3.5% Convertible
                       Note of AIM Group, Inc.
                       --------------------------------------


Dear _____________________:

     This letter  agreement  provides  for an  amendment  to the Series A 3.5%
Convertible Note (the "Note") issued on December 20, 1995 to you by AIM Group,
Inc. (the "Company") in the principal amount of $______________.  The Board of
Directors of the Company has approved the changes in the terms of the Note set
forth below and, upon acceptance by you in the space set forth below, the Note
will be deemed to be amended to give  effect to such  changes,  subject to the
approval of the Vancouver Stock  Exchange.  Defined terms set forth below have
the same  meaning  as  prescribed  in the Note  unless the  context  otherwise
requires.

     The Note is amended as follows:

     1.  MATURITY.  The Maturity  Date of the Note is extended to be March 31,
         1998.

     2.  INTEREST RATE.  The annual  interest rate of the Note is increased to
         10%,  effective January 1, 1997,  payable quarterly in arrears at the
         beginning of each calendar quarter.

     3.  THE  CONVERSION  PRICE.  The  conversion  provisions  of the Note are
         amended to  provide  that the Note will be  convertible  prior to the
         Maturity  Date at a Conversion  Price of $.70 per share (which amount
         is more than 500% higher than the current bid price per share for the
         common stock on the  Vancouver  Stock  Exchange).  The  provisions in
         Section 3(d) of the Note  relating to  conversion  subsequent  to the
         Maturity Date are deleted.


<PAGE>

     4.  SENIOR DEBT  LIMITATION.  Amending the letter dated December 22, 1995
         to you from the undersigned,  the Company will not, without the prior
         approval  of the holders of at least 80% of the  principal  amount of
         the  Series  A  3.5%  Convertible   Notes   outstanding,   incur  any
         indebtedness  which  ranks  senior  in  priority  to  payment  of the
         indebtedness under the outstanding Series A 3.5% Convertible Notes.


                                                Sincerely yours,


                                                AIM GROUP, INC.


                                                By:_________________________
                                                   Paul R. Arena
                                                   Chairman of the Board and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer



 Accepted on this


 ______ day of April, 1997

 [Name of Note Holder]


 By:______________________
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Manuel RAMIREZ-ELIZALDE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40741

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*371Derly Joel Uribe, Law Offices of Francisco J. Saldana, Jr., Laredo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Jose Manuel Ramirez-Elizalde, Washington, MS, pro se.

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Manuel Ramirez-Elizalde has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ramirez-Elizalde has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Mymetics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Christian J.F. Rochet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ernst Luebke,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Christian J.F. Rochet
    -----------------------------
    Christian J.F. Rochet
    Chief Executive Officer

By: /s/ Ernst Luebke
    -----------------------------
    Ernst Luebke
    Chief Financial Officer

March 26, 2009
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Scott J. Davidson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.



|      |  |                   |  |  |  |        |  |                                               
|----- |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Scott J. Davidson                         
|      |  |                   |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Scott J. Davidson                             
|      |  |                   |  |  |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6457

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER IVORY ARTIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:02-cr-00308-BO-1)

Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Ivory Artis, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. MayParker, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael Gordon James, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Ivory Artis appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Artis, 

No. 5:02-cr-00308-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Mar. 19, 2013, entered 

Mar. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: Debi Crow

To: Cindy Martinez

Subject: RE: 04-13-00874-CR Mandate Acknowledgement Late

Date: Friday, June 12, 2015 12:25:48 PM

After looking in file we never have received it. Last correspondence from Court is Memorandum

 dated 2/19/2015.

From: Cindy Martinez [mailto:Cindy.Martinez@txcourts.gov] 

Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 12:11 PM

To: Debi Crow

Subject: 04-13-00874-CR Mandate Acknowledgement Late

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-13-00874-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 12-2210-CR-C

Style: George Garcia, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

On April 20, 2015, this Court issued the mandate in the above referenced case.

Rule 51.2, Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, requires “acknowledgment to the appellate clerk

of the mandate’s receipt.” This Court has not received the required acknowledgment in this case.

Please advise me of the date the mandate was received in your office.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Cynthia A. Martinez

Fourth Court of Appeals

Cadena-Reeves Justice Center

300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200

San Antonio, Texas 78205-3037

Phone: (210) 335-3853

E-Mail: Cindy.Martinez@txcourts.gov
Exhibit
      10.26











US
      BANK








November
      17, 2005














Featherlite,
      Inc.


Highways
      63 & 9


P
      O Box
      320


Cresco,
      Iowa 52136


Attentions:
      Jeffery A. Mason








Gentlemen:








Reference
      is hereby made to that certain Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as
      of
      July 31, 2002, by and between you and us, as amended (as so amended, the (“Loan
      Agreement”). All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall
      have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Loan
      Agreement.





This
      letter will confirm our understanding that the limitation on Capital
      Expenditures and Capitalized Leases set forth in Section 5.01(o)(iv) of the
      Loan
      Agreement shall be amended as follows: a) during Borrower’s fiscal year 2005,
      the limit shall be increased to $8,000,000.00 of which up to $5,500,000.00
      is
      related to Borrower’s repurchase of real property located in Sanford, Florida
      and b) during Borrower’s fiscal year 2006, the limit shall be up to $3,000,000.
      Indebtedness incurred by Borrower in connection with the repurchase of such
      property will be permitted by Section 5.02(a)(v) of the Loan
      Agreement.





This
      letter is not and shall not be construed as an amendment or waiver of any of
      the
      other terms, provisions, conditions or covenants contained in the Loan
      Agreement.












**U.S.
              BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION**By:
            /s/ Daryl
              HagstromVice
              President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEEON ANTONIO FRASIER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 215 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4417

_____________________________ S TEPHEN L AMONT E ARLY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County

. William E. Davis , Judge

. February 20, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OBERTS , K ELSEY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Stephen Lamont Early, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley B

. Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.