alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350
AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward Dickinson, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Edward Dickinson

Edward H. DickinsonChief Financial OfficerMay 13, 2005

1
Dismiss and Opinion Filed August 2, 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05
- 23
- 00211
- CV RONNIE WADE AND CARO LYN WADE , Appellant s V. BRECKENRIDGE PROPERT Y FUND 2016, LLC , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 22
- 05861
- B MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Pedersen, III

Opinion by Justice Molberg The only iss ue in this forcible detainer appeal is whether the trial court properly de termined appellee had a superior right of possession to certain property occupied by appellants. See Marshall v. Housing Auth. of City of San Antonio , 198 S.W.3d 782, 785, 787 (Tex. 2006). By verified motion, appellee informs the Court
that appellants are no longer in possession of the property and urges we dismiss the appeal because the case has become moot. See Olley v. HVM, L.L.C. , 449 S.W.3d 573, 575 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dis t.] 2014, pet. denied) (appellate courts lack jurisdiction over moot controversies). Appellee also asks we award it attorney’s fees– 2

–

and costs. Although appellee’s motion has been on file for more than ten days, appellants have not filed a response or oth erwise refuted appellee’s contention. Unless a tenant has “a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession of the property,” the issue of possession in a forcible detainer action becomes moot when the tenant vacates the property. See Marshall , 198 S.W.3d at 782. When the issue becomes moot on appeal and no other issues exist, the appellate court must vacate the underlying judgment and dismiss the entire underlying case.
See id. at 785, 790. We deny appellee’s motion to the extent appellee requests attorney’s fees and costs, but , with nothing before us showing appellants have a potentially meritorious claim of right to current possession of the property, we grant the motion to the extent appellee asserts the case has become moot

. We vacate the trial court’s final judgment and dismiss the case. See Marshall , 198 S.W.3d at 785, 790.

230211f.p05 /Ken Molberg/ / KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

RONNIE WADE AND CAROLYN WADE, Appellants
No. 05

- 23

- 00211

- CV V.
BRECKENRIDGE PROPERTY FUND 2016, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 22

- 05861

- B. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg, Chief Justice Burns and Justice Pedersen, III participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we VACATE the trial court’s March 6, 2023 final judgment and DISMISS the case
.

Judgment entered this 2 nd day of August 2023.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Metallica Resources Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.

Date:  May 18, 2004

/s/ Richard J. Hall
-------------------------
Richard J. Hall
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.02




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





I, Vincent De Lorenzo, certify that:





Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on.Form 10-Q of Digital Creative Development Corporation for the quarter ending September 30, 2010 (the"Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: June 28, 2011/s/ Vincent De LorenzoVincent De LorenzoChief Financial Officer
ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This  Addendum to  Employment  Agreement is entered into as of February 28,
2001 by and between Network Commerce Inc. ("Network Commerce") and Dr. Ganapathy
Krishnan, CTO ("Employee")

     Network  Commerce and  Employee  entered  into an  employment  agreement by
letter dated September 8, 2000 (the  "Employment  Agreement").  Network Commerce
and  Employee  desire to amend the  Employment  Agreement  to secure  Employee's
commitment to continue hus full-time  employment with Network  Commerce  through
June 30, 2001.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  for valuable  consideration,  the parties  agree that the
Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

     1. Company will pay Employee $ 50,000.00 on April 2, 2001.

     2. Company will pay Employee $ 50,000.00 on Monday, May 2, 2001.

     3.  Company  will pay  Employee's  accrued paid time off ("PTO") on July 2,
2001.

     4. Company will extend the exercise date on all options granted to Employee
to June 30, 2002.

     5. In lieu of additional  grants of options to acquire Company's stock with
a vesting  period of fifteen  months,  Company will vest  Employee's  options to
acquire  80,000  shares of Company's  common stock,  at an exercise  price $.28,
through June 30, 2001,

     6. Company will announce Employee's resignation on or about June 1, 2001.

     7. Employee agrees that he shall not schedule or take a sabbatical  through
June 30, 2001.  Furthermore,  Employee agrees that he shall not schedule or take
more than three (3) consecutive  days of vacation,  or a total of ten (10) days,
through June 30, 2001 except in the event of a family or medical  emergency.  In
this event,  Employee agrees to extend his employment  with Network  Commerce to
compensate for the vacation days taken.

<PAGE>

     8. Employee agrees to promptly refund any compensation advanced pursuant to
the  terms of this  addendum  if  Employee  does not  fulfill  the  terms of the
Addendum or if Employee's  employment with Network  Commerce is terminated prior
to June 30, 2001 for any reason other than by Network Commerce without Cause (as
defined in the Employment Agreement).

     9. This  Addendum is binding on the parties and their  respective  personal
representatives, successors, transferees and assigns.

     10. Except as expressly modified hereby,  the Employment  Agreement remains
in full force and effect.


     DATED as of the day and year first above written.


NETWORK COMMERCE:                       EMPLOYEE:

Network Commerce Inc.




By:/s/ Dwayne Walker                  By:/s/ Dr. Ganapathy Krishnan
Dwayne Walker                                Dr. Ganapathy Krishnan
Chairman & CEO
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22034]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Notice of Adjustment of Minimum Project Worksheet Amount

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice that the minimum Project Worksheet Amount 
under the Public Assistance program for disasters and emergencies 
declared on or after October 1, 2017, will be increased.

DATES: This adjustment applies to major disasters and emergencies 
declared on or after October 1, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Logan, Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3834.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207 and 44 CFR 206.202(d)(2) 
provide that FEMA will annually adjust the minimum Project Worksheet 
amount under the Public Assistance program to reflect changes in the 
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the 
Department of Labor.
    FEMA gives notice of an increase to $3,140 for the minimum amount 
that will be approved for any Project Worksheet under the Public 
Assistance program for all major disasters and emergencies declared on 
or after October 1, 2017.
    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price 
Index for All Urban Consumers of 1.9 percent for the 12-month period 
that ended in August 2017. This is based on information released by the 
Bureau of Labor Statistics at the U.S. Department of Labor on September 
14, 2017.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters).

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-22034 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
H. R. 2913 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine 

An Act 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 301 Simonton Street in Key 

West, Florida, as the ‘‘Sidney M. Aronovitz United States Courthouse’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The United States courthouse located at 301 Simonton Street 

in Key West, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sidney 

M. Aronovitz United States Courthouse’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse 

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

‘‘Sidney M. Aronovitz United States Courthouse’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raúl Alarcón, Jr., as Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Raúl Alarcón, Jr.Name:

Raúl Alarcón, Jr.Title:

Chief Executive Officer and President


Date: April 12, 2013
<PAGE>   1




                                  EXHIBIT 24.1


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Brent L. Motchan his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and revocation, for him and
in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities (including his capacity
as an officer of Zeigler Coal Holding Company), to sign the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, and all amendments
thereto, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto such attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as
fully to all intents and purposes as such person might or could do in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agent, or
his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Power of Attorney has been signed on March 24, 1998 by the following persons in
the capacities indicated.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
               Signature                                    Capacity
               ---------                                    --------
<S>                                                        <C>

           /s/ Michael K. Reilly                           Chairman of the Board and Director
       ------------------------------
               Michael K. Reilly

           /s/ Chand B. Vyas                               Chief Executive Officer, President and
       ------------------------------                        Director (Principal Executive Officer)
               Chand B. Vyas

           /s/ Roland E. Casati                            Director
       ------------------------------
               Roland E. Casati

           /s/ Robert W. Ericson                           Director
       ------------------------------
               Robert W. Ericson

           /s/ John F. Manley                              Director
       ------------------------------
               John F. Manley

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  150,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,591,665
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,792,277
<PP&E>                                      25,140,867
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,266,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,524,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,308,237
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,219,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,524,555
<SALES>                                     17,731,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,731,585
<CGS>                                       13,380,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,443,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               226,067
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,389,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,124,403
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,124,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,124,403
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Vincent C. Smith, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: December 7, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Vincent C. Smith
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                |  | Vincent C. Smith,      
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Title:               |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 4.3




Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated December 18, 2014, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-199663) of Smart Trust,
Tax Advantaged Growth & Income Trust, Series 6.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


December 18, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunterra Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/    NICHOLAS J. BENSON
|                         



Dated: May 10, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Scott J. Davidson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.



|      |  |             |  |  |  |        |  |                                               
|----- |  | ----------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------
|      |  |             |  | 
|Date: |  | May 9, 2008 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Scott J. Davidson                         
|      |  |             |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Scott J. Davidson                             
|      |  |             |  |  |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique ALDAY-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10334.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 9, 2011.

Krissa Marie Lanham, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

*682Daniel L. Kaplan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDAZ-Federal Public Defender’s Office Phoenix, AZ, for Defendan1>-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Enrique Alday-Lopez appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Alday-Lopez contends that the district court erred under *United States v. Miqbel,*444 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir.2006), by improperly considering the need for punishment. This contention is belied by the record.

Alday-Lopez also contends that the district court erred by providing an insufficiently compelling justification for the sentence. The district court did not commit procedural error. *See United States v. Simtob,*485 F.3d 1058, 1062 (9th Cir.2007) (noting that deterrence is one consideration under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(B) and holding that “[t]he seriousness of the offense underlying the revocation, though not a focal point of the inquiry, may be considered to a lesser degree as part of the criminal history of the violator”). Moreover, in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), the sentence is substantively reasonable. *See Miqbel,*444 F.3d at 1181-82 (explaining the factors to consider under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.