alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Vincent C. Smith, certify that:

*             *1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Quest Software,Inc.;

*             *2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

*             *3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

*             *4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;

                     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

                     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting  that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

*             *5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

                     (a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

                     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

| Date: August 14, 2003 | /s/  VINCENT C. SMITH  |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------|
|                  |                             |
|                  | **Vincent C. Smith,**       |
|                  | **Chief Executive Officer** |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                               0001088211
<NAME>                                              NEWSGURUS.COM, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1
<CURRENCY>                                          USA

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              3,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      3,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               28,111
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (34,811)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        3,500
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    27,876
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (27,876)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (27,876)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.00





</TABLE>
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the registrant certify, to the best of their knowledge, that the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.   Date: February 22, 2011  NextMart, Inc.  /s/Wang YihanWang YihanChief Executive Officer   /s/Carla ZhouCarla ZhouChief Financial Officer       1
EXHIBIT 23.2



           NOTICE REGARDING OMISSION OF CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

     The report of Arthur Andersen LLP dated February 27, 2002 relating to
certain of the financial statements that appear in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, is incorporated by reference into our Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-87715, 333-39129, 333-59859, 33-85272, 33-94972, 333-41954, 333-54010,
333-63156 and 333-100094) and our Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.
333-86072). Arthur Andersen LLP has not consented to the incorporation by
reference of their report on our financial statements into those registration
statements. We have dispensed with the requirement to file their consent in
reliance upon Rule 437a under the Securities Act of 1933. Because Arthur
Andersen LLP has not consented to the incorporation by reference of their report
into those registration statements, you will not be able to recover against
Arthur Andersen LLP under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.

     Section 11(a) provides that if any part of a registration statement, at the
time such registration statement becomes effective, contains any untrue
statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any
person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration statement (unless such
person knows of such untruth or omission) may sue, among others, every
accountant who has consented to be named as having prepared or certified any
part of the registration statement, or as having prepared or certified any
report or valuation that is used in connection with the registration statement,
with respect to the statement in such registration statement, report or
valuation that purports to have been prepared or certified by the accountant.

     Because we are unable to obtain Arthur Andersen's written consent to the
incorporation by reference of their report on such financial statements, Rule
437a permits us to file registration statements without that written consent.
Because it did not consent, Arthur Andersen does not become subject to liability
under Section 11(a), as discussed above. Consequently, stockholders would be
unable to sue Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) in connection with the
purchase or sale of securities. However, other persons who are subject to
liability under Section 11, including the Company's officer and directors, may
still rely on Arthur Andersen's original audit reports as being made by an
expert for purposes of establishing a due diligence defense under Section 11(b)
of the Securities Act.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document





































 



 
 

  Exhibit 10(e)(e)(e)    
    


 
 

  TENTH AMENDMENT TO THE HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
  2005 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
  (Amended and restated effective October 1, 2006)    
    


        The Hewlett-Packard Company 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006, is
hereby amended, effective as of the date executed below, to provide as follows: 


        1.     The
definition of "Incentive Award" in Article I shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows: 



        " 'Incentive Award' means an amount payable to an Eligible Employee under a cash bonus or incentive compensation plan of HP
or an Affiliate that the Committee has deemed eligible for deferral, including bonuses paid under the EPfR Plan, the PfR Plan, the CPB Plan, the Hewlett-Packard Financial Services Incentive
Compensation Plan, the Shoreline Investment Management Company Performance Incentive Plan, the Hewlett-Packard Company Client Principal Incentive Plan, and the annual bonus portion of the
Hewlett-Packard Account Executive Pay for Performance Incentive Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, the Hewlett-Packard Account Executive Pay for Performance Incentive Plan shall be considered an
Incentive Award under this Plan beginning with the fiscal year 2014 payment." 




        This
Tenth Amendment to the Hewlett-Packard Company 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby adopted this 12th day of September, 2014. 

 






					
	 	 	HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
	

 	
 	
By:	
 	
/s/ TRACY S. KEOGH






  Tracy S. Keogh
 Executive Vice President, Human Resources




 

 








QuickLinks



Exhibit 10(e)(e)(e)


TENTH AMENDMENT TO THE HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 2005 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (Amended and restated effective October 1, 2006)
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

** as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Entheos Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on the Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derek Cooper, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)        the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)       The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.

 

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie LEGETT, a.k.a. Little Willie, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-14526

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 7, 2011.

Anne R. Schultz, Wifredo A. Ferrer, U.S. Attorney, Armando Rosquete, Kathleen M. Salyer, William Carter White, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Neison Max Marks, Gail M. Stage, Kathleen M. Williams, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HULL, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Willie Legett appeals the revocation of his supervised release, as well as the reasonableness of his 14-month revocation sentence. The district court found that Legett violated his release by committing the crimes of resisting arrest and witness tampering, in violation of Florida law.

We find no merit to Legett’s claim that there was insufficient evidence to establish that he resisted arrest or engaged in witness tampering. At the revocation hearing, the district court considered the testimony of Sergeant Humberto Ruiz of the City of Hialeah, Florida Police Department. Sergeant Ruiz testified that when he responded to a call that accused Legett of a sexual offense, Legett: (1) persistently stared down the victim of the alleged sexual offense; (2) screamed out, “[S]ee what I am going to do to you, bitch”; (3) leaned back in his seat in an effort to kick out a window of the police car; and (4) stiffened his body and wedged his foot into the cage of the car in order to make it difficult for the officers to apply a restraint. Although the state dropped the charges against Legett, the defense pre*828sented no evidence at the revocation hearing to rebut Sergeant Ruiz’s testimony and nothing in the record suggests that the district court’s implicit credibility determination was clearly erroneous. Sergeant Ruiz’s testimony sufficiently established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Legett committed the crimes of resisting arrest and witness tampering, and the district court, accordingly, did not abuse its discretion in revoking supervised release.

Legett next contends that his 14-month sentence is procedurally and substantively unreasonable. The sentence fell at the top of the applicable 8-14 month guideline range, but we ordinarily expect guideline sentences to be reasonable. *United States v. Talley,*431 F.3d 784, 788 (11th Cir.2005) (per curiam). Although it is unclear whether Legett preserved his reasonableness challenge, we find his sentence to be both procedurally and substantively reasonable under either a plain-error or an abuse-of-discretion standard. The record shows that the distinct court correctly calculated the guideline range, considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and heard Legett’s arguments in mitigation. In the end, the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that a sentence at the high-end of the guidelines range was necessary to comply with the purposes of § 3553(a).

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

FEMA gives notice that the countywide per capita impact indicator under the Public Assistance program for disasters declared on or after October 1, 2017, will be increased.

# DATES:

This adjustment applies to major disasters declared on or after October 1, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher Logan, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3834.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In assessing damages for area designations under 44 CFR 206.40(b), FEMA uses a countywide per capita indicator to evaluate the impact of the disaster at the county level. FEMA will adjust the countywide per capita impact indicator under the Public Assistance program to reflect annual changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Department of Labor.

FEMA gives notice of an increase in the countywide per capita impact indicator to $3.68 for all disasters declared on or after October 1, 2017.

FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers of 1.9 percent for the 12-month period that ended in August 2017. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor released the information on September 14, 2017.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters).

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-22031 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Holmes Protection Group, Inc.
For the Year Ended December 31, 1996
Financial Data Schedule Worksheet
Commercial and Industrial Companies - Article 5 of Regulation S-X
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             990
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                       973
<INVENTORY>                                      2,795
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,566
<PP&E>                                         121,956
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,758
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,436
<BONDS>                                          4,734
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,394
<SALES>                                          8,879
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,424
<CGS>                                            7,438
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,124
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,563
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (146)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (537)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,033)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,185)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)

</TABLE>
#### Wilcox, Gibbs & Company *vs.*Aaron.

A motion for new trial, on the ground that the verdict is strongly and decidedly against the weight of the evidence, is addressed to the sound discretion of the judge of the superior court, and this court will not review or control his discretion in refusing a new trial, if there is enough evidence to sustain the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

December 2, 1884.

Blandford, Justice.
Exhibit 10.5

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO

 

THE FOREST OIL CORPORATION

 

1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

 

(Amended and Restated, effective May 7, 2013)

 

THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into by Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation, previously named Forest Oil Corporation (the “Company”):

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Forest Oil Corporation 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated, effective May 7, 2013 (the “Plan”);

 

WHEREAS, the Company has approved a Merger Agreement dated May 5, 2014 entered into by and among the Company and the Sabine Parties (as defined in the Merger Agreement), including all amendments thereto, (the “Merger Agreement”);

 

WHEREAS, the Company does not wish to terminate the Plan;

 

WHEREAS, in connection with the closing of the transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement, the Company desires to take action to freeze the ability to participate in, and the continuation of, the Plan by discontinuing all grants of options, Dates of Grant (as defined in the Plan), Option Periods (as defined in the Plan), and payroll deductions under or pursuant to the Plan, effective as of the close of the Option Period ending on December 31, 2014 and before the commencement of the Option Period that would otherwise be scheduled to begin on January 1, 2015 and continuing indefinitely until further action is taken by the Company; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company has the authority to amend the Plan, pursuant to Section 16 thereof.

 

NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows (this “Amendment”).

 

1.                                      The ability to participate in, and the continuation of, the Plan shall be frozen by discontinuing all Dates of Grant, Option Periods, and payroll deductions under or pursuant to the Plan, effective as of the close of the Option Period ending on December 31, 2014 and before the commencement of the Option Period that would otherwise be scheduled to begin on January 1, 2015 and continuing indefinitely until further action is taken by the Company.  For the avoidance of doubt:

 

a.                                      No Date of Grant shall occur on January 1, 2015 or thereafter unless and until further action is taken by the Company.

 

b.                                      No Option Periods following the Option Period ending on December 31, 2014 shall commence unless and until further action is taken by the Company.

 











 

c.                                       All payroll deductions applicable to any Option Period following the Option Period ending on December 31, 2014 shall be canceled unless and until further action is taken by the Company.

 

d.                                      The Plan is being frozen in all respects unless and until further action is taken by the Company.

 

e.                                       The Plan is not being terminated.