2008 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
4-29-2008 

# In Re: D i scove ry L a

b
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 07-2080

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2008 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du
. Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" In Re: Di s c o ve r y L a

b " (2008). 2008 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1311. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008/1311NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

_____________ N o. 07- 2080

_____________ I N R E : DI S CO VE RY L AB OR AT OR I E S S E CU RI T I E S L I T I GAT I ON TH E M I ZLA G RO U P ( J OS E P H, DE NI S E , AL AN, E RI N, J UL I A M I Z L A)

a n d CLAI RE S P OON ER, A p p e llan ts
A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e E a ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D
. C
. C i vi l N o. 06- cv- 01820) D istric t Ju d g e : H o n o ra b le S tew a rt D a lze ll
A r gued M ar ch 25, 2008 B efor e: M cK E E , R E N D E L L and TA SH I M A *, C i r cui tJ udges

( Fi l ed: A pr i l 29, 2008)
J a m e s R . M a lo n e , J r., E s q . [ ARGUE D] C h im icle s & T ik e lli s 361 W es tL anca s t erA venue O n e H av erf

o rd C en tr e H aver for d, PA 19041 C ouns el f orAppel l ant

s The Miz l a G r oup

__________________ * H onor abl e A
. W al l ace T as hi m a, Seni orJ udge of the U ni t ed St at es C our tof A p p e a ls f

o r t h e N in th C ir c u it, s ittin g b yd e s ig n a tio n .2

C arol A
. M ager, E sq M a g e r & G o ld ste in 1818 M ar ketSt r eet , Sui t e 3710 Phi l adel phi a, PA 19103 C ouns el f orAppel l antC l ai r e Spooner R o b e rt L . H ic k o k , E s q . [ ARGUE D] C hr i s t opherJ
. H uber , E s q. G ayP. R ai nvi l l e, E s q. PepperH ami l t on 1 8 th & A rc h S tre e ts 3 0 0 0 T w o L o g an S q u are Phi l adel phi a, PA 19103 C ouns el f orAppel l ees

OPI NI ON O F THE COURT
R E N D E L L , C i r cui tJudge
. 

### P laintif f s, th e M izla G ro up an dC laire S p o o n er, ap p eal th e d ismissal o f th eir Se c ond Am e nde d Com

pl a i nt ( “ the Com

pl a i nt ” ) i n as e c uri t i e s c l a s s a c t i on. I n the Com pl a i nt , the y

a l l e ge d vi ol at i ons of Se c t i on 10(b) of the Se c uri t i e s Exc hange Ac t of 1934, 15 U. S. C. § 78j(b) , and Rul e 10b- 5 pr om ul gat e d unde r

the Ac t , 17 CFR § 2 4 0 .1 0 b -5 , bydefe ndant s , D i s coveryL abor at or i es , I nc. ( “D i s covery ”) , R ober tC apet ol a, Pr es i dentand C hi ef Execut i ve O ffi cerof D i s covery , and C hr i s t opherSchaber , for m er C hi ef O per at i ng O ffi cerof D i s covery . T he D i s t r i ctC our tcons i der ed the cl ai m s i n t he C o m p lain t in a len g th yo p in io n a n d u lti m a telyd ism iss e d e a c h c laim f o r f a ilu re to
s uffi ci ent l ypl ead mat er i al i t yand/ ors ci ent erundert he hei ght ened pl eadi ng s t andar ds ofI n par t i cul ar , w e not e thatappel l ant s appea l t he di s m i s s al of t hei ral l egat i ons r el at i ng 1 t o s t at ement s m ade r egar di ng t he l i kel i hood of appr oval byt he Europe an M edi ci nes E v alua ti o n A g en cyo n lyo n the b asis o f m aterial ity . T h e D istri ct C o u rt , h o w ev er, di s m i s s ed thos e al l egat i ons bas ed on i ns uffi ci entpl eadi ng of s ci ent eras w el l , and appel l ant s do notchal l enge thatdet er m i nat i on on appea l
. T hus , a rul i ng i n t hei rfavoron t he mat er i al i t yi s s ue w oul d be unava i l i ng. 3 t he Pr i vat e Secur i t i es L i t i gat i on R eform A ct . T he pl ai nt i ffs appea l t he di s m i s s al of t he
m aj ori t yof thei r cl ai m s, bu thav e aban do ned or w ai ved other s. 1 W e fi nd t he D i s t r i ctC our t ’ s opi ni on w el l
- r eas oned and do notfi nd t hatanyof the is s u e s b e f

o re u s c o n s titu te s g ro u n d s f o r d is tu rb in g o r v a ryin g f ro m its a n a lysis
. A c c o rd in g ly , w e w ill a f f irm th e d ism iss a l o f

th e c o m p lain t f

o r th e re a so n s s e t f

o rth t her ei n.