alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                           INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
                              A Nevada Corporation

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Investment Associates, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Steve Khan,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and Robert
Hemmerling, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated February 11, 2005                    /s/ Steve Khan
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Steve Khan,
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ Robert Hemmerling
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert Hemmerling,
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Emergency Filtration Products, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Douglas K. Beplate, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Douglas K. Beplate
Douglas K. Beplate, Principal Executive Officer

Date: May 13, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GROVERSELLERS 

A,TORNEY GENERAL 

5.21 

Xanorrbke Y. C. Ledbetter 

CouRty *ttomey 

coehroa couclty 

3f&wtoR, Te%as 

Xe have reae regent date requeethe 8bMe subJact 

eTe1 0pQortuRitlea to 

to oampletlan. ROW, 

coEamleaionera' court 

xaej hare Wm atathorlty to:' 

iblto any one*, undar~ttis 

ay op5nlo~ thet umlor the law, aa set 

eforomntioned 8tatuta, 4478, the Cuird. Court 6008 aot hare the authority to 

loeoe ~fd County LW8gital. hnd in my O~&&ZI 

the oourt doee not hbve the mathority to loasro 

maid hospital under Artlo& 4494a. 4494b, 44940, 

4494d. 449M. 4494tr 44946, 4494h aad 1494l. in 

tier or the hot that thepoQulratioR of coahreri 

county, Texsa, aooordfag~to the 1940 omw.zs wa8 

3,735. 
522 

Bon.. M. C. Ledbetter, pa&s 2 

*Thora haa been aame oontroveray in cochran 

Chat-y over the lelaaing Of the County Hoepita& 

aad tho Oaamisr~onera* Court hsa asked me to get 

aa opinion from your oifiae on the matter$ theraiore, I would agpreaiate it if you wouid sand us 

your opinion a5 e.0or.i a8 poeeible,m 

Coah.ran i%?unty hall a population of 3,735 inhabitanta aoaordlag t0 tha 1940 Fedora1 Uanau8. 

Thlr department has repeatably held that the Oamiseloner~a 

Court is a aourt oi lImIted juriadlation MU has on4 au&h power6 

66 arr aonierred upon it by ths Constitution an& statute6 of thlr 

state either by expreea term or by neoeetaarf iPlplioatlon. soa- 

,tion 18 ot'Mials B oi the Texas Constitution; Artialo 2351, 

V. A. 0. 8.; Van Boeenberg t. Lotett, 173 8. PI. 508, silllor v. 

Brown, 2l6 9. WV. (2d) 479 

uvalflo countg, 167 9. w. t 

Galveston IS, & 9. A. Ry. 00, v. 

2dI 108&f ll kzas Juriaprudimae 564. 

The Le&lelat~e hma attempteil to g.kve oertaln oountiea 

tho power to lease oounty hospitals. BewArtialca &9l+a, &l&b, 

444i;,op 4h&-4~gi 44941, 494i3, fu 494hr wmxi*a mma We do not pars upon the valiaity of 

theme ittetutea, for ihat question ir not before us. Bren if 

said 8tatutoe are vallb, coohraa County will not tell in any 

or the aatogor%ea aet.bp the fomgoint$ artialerr, einoe it bm 

a population of 3,735. In the abaenoe oi eueh oonstltutioneL 

or Aatutory authority, Ooohran Oouuty has no euthorlty to 

leano the aouaty hospital. YOU quaetfoa is thaxafom azmwared 

in the negative. 

Yours tory truly, 

ATl!ORNXY GWEBAL W -YS!US 

BY (p. s”kL,j/jL 

3. c. Davis, Jr. 

A6ai8tUIt
#### Ahmad ALI, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75916.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 17, 2008.*

Filed April 23, 2008.

Manpreet Singh Gahra, Law Office of Manpreet Singh Gahra, Berkeley, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Sherrill Laprade Carvalho, Esq., Office of The U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, Daniel E. Goldman, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, WALLACE and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

The record supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, as petitioner’s testimony contained discrepancies and was inconsistent with his asylum page 2 application. Substantial evidence thus supports the IJ’s finding that petitioner isn’t eligible for asylum. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B). Petitioner is therefore also necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cm. 2003). Petitioner’s claim for relief under the Convention Against Torture fails because a reasonable adjudicator would not be compelled to find that it’s more likely than not that he would be tortured if removed. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     FIRST AMENDMENT dated December 17, 1997 to Employment Agreement, dated
as of October 1, 1994, between California Federal Bank, A Federal Savings
Bank (formerly known as First Nationwide Bank, A Federal Savings Bank) (the
"Company") and Gerald J. Ford (the "Executive").

     WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of
October 1, 1994 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, the parties wish to make certain amendments to the Employment
Agreement.

     NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

     1. Section 3 is hereby amended by deleting "October 1, 1994 through
December 31, 1997" and inserting in lieu thereof "January 1, 1998 through
December 31, 2000".

     2. Section 4(a) is hereby amended by deleting the number "$750,000" and
inserting in lieu thereof "$1,000,000".

     3. Section 4(e) is hereby amended in its entirety by deleting the text
and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

     "(e) Paid Time Off. During the Term, the Executive shall be
     entitled to paid time off ("PTO") of five weeks taken in
     accordance with the PTO policy of the Company during each
     year of the Term."


<PAGE>


     4. The parties agree that except as expressly amended hereby, the 
Agreement as amended hereby shall be in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.

                                        CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK,
       A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK



                                           By: /s/ Carl B. Webb 
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Carl B. Webb II
                                           President and Chief operating
                                           Officer


                                           /s/ Gerald J. Ford
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Gerald J. Ford
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clay Adams, Appellant.

[862 NYS2d 223]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Frank E Geraci, Jr., A.J.), entered October 12, 2006. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 *et seq.).*Defendant was presumptively classified at that risk level after Supreme Court reduced the total risk factor score on the risk assessment instrument by 20 points. We reject the contention of defendant that the court abused its discretion in denying his request for a further downward departure based on his postrelease behavior *(see People v Perkins,*32 AD3d 1241 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 718 [2006]). Defendant failed to present clear and convincing evidence of the existence of special circumstances to warrant a downward departure from the presumptive risk level *(see People v Marks,*31 AD3d 1142 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 715 [2006]; *People v Hamelinck,*23 AD3d 1060 [2005]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P, Lunn, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,559
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                       632
<INVENTORY>                                      6,932
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,834
<PP&E>                                           2,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,656
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,188
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,574)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,350
<SALES>                                         67,791
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,791
<CGS>                                           51,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,353
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,768
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,585
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
        

</TABLE>
Order filed August 10, 2020

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-20-00176-CV

__________

IN RE GERMANIA SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY

Original Mandamus Proceeding

O R D E R

In conjunction with its original mandamus proceeding, Germania Select 

Insurance Company has filed in this court a motion for temporary relief. In that 

motion, Germania requests “temporary relief in the form of abatement of discovery 

on plaintiff’s claims for extracontractual liability.” Germania asserts that such

temporary relief is necessary in order to protect Germania from undue expense, 

harassment, and expenditure of resources during this process and also to preserve 

and protect this court’s jurisdiction over the petition for writ of mandamus that was 

filed concurrently with the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(a).

Pursuant to Rule 52.10(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant 

Germania’s motion for temporary relief and hereby stay any further discovery 
2

related to the extracontractual claims asserted by the real party in interest against 

Germania. Such discovery is stayed pending further order of this court or final 

disposition of this mandamus proceeding.

PER CURIAM

August 10, 2020

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating.

1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 of Dutch Gold Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel W. Hollis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: August 25, 2011





/s/Daniel W. HollisDaniel W. Hollis, Chief Executive Officer and Director(principal executive officer)
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3319 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

AN ACT 

To allow the Pascua Yaqui Tribe to determine the 

requirements for membership in that tribe. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3319 RFS

1 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERSHIP DETER2 MINED BY TRIBE. 

3 Section 3 of Public Law 95–375 (25 U.S.C. 1300f– 

4 2) is amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 3. For the purposes of section 1 of this Act, 

6 membership of the Pascua Yaqui Tribe shall consist of any 

7 United States citizen of Pascua Yaqui blood enrolled by 

8 the tribe.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 

2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3103 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3103

 To revise certain requirements relating to the Department of Veterans 
 Affairs pilot program of enhanced contract care authority for health 
             care needs of veterans in highly rural areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2009

 Mr. Moran of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revise certain requirements relating to the Department of Veterans 
 Affairs pilot program of enhanced contract care authority for health 
             care needs of veterans in highly rural areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PILOT PROGRAM OF 
              ENHANCED CONTRACT CARE AUTHORITY FOR HEALTH CARE NEEDS OF 
              VETERANS IN HIGHLY RURAL AREAS.

    Subsection (b) of section 403 of the Veterans' Mental Health and 
Other Care Improvements Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-387; 38 U.S.C. 1703 
note) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Covered Veterans.--For purposes of the pilot program under 
this section, a covered veteran is any veteran who--
            ``(1) is--
                    ``(A) enrolled in the system of patient enrollment 
                established under section 1705(a) of title 38, United 
                States Code, as of the date of the commencement of the 
                pilot program under subsection (a)(2); or
                    ``(B) eligible for health care under section 
                1710(e)(3)(C) of title 38, United States Code; and
            ``(2) resides in a location that is--
                    ``(A) more than 60 minutes' driving distance, as 
                determined by the Secretary, from the nearest 
                Department health care facility providing primary care 
                services, in the case of a veteran seeking such 
                services;
                    ``(B) more than 120 minutes' driving distance, as 
                determined by the Secretary, from the nearest 
                Department health care facility providing acute 
                hospital care, in the case of a veteran seeking such 
                care; and
                    ``(C) more than 240 minutes' driving distance, as 
                determined by the Secretary, from the nearest 
                Department health care facility providing tertiary 
                care, in the case of a veteran seeking such care.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22401]



[[Page 48216]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XF737


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Surfclam 
and Ocean Quahog Fisheries; Notice That Vendor Will Provide 2018 Cage 
Tags

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of vendor to provide fishing year 2018 cage tags.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS informs surfclam and ocean quahog individual transferable 
quota (ITQ) allocation holders that they will be required to purchase 
their fishing year 2018 (January 1, 2018-December 31, 2018) cage tags 
from the National Band and Tag Company. The intent of this notice is to 
comply with regulations for the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog 
fisheries and to promote efficient distribution of cage tags.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna Macan, Fishery Management 
Specialist, (978) 281-9165; fax (978) 281-9161.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Atlantic surfclam and ocean 
quahog fishery regulations at 50 CFR 648.77(b) authorize the Regional 
Administrator of the Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS, to specify in the 
Federal Register a vendor from whom cage tags, required under the 
Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery Management Plan (FMP), shall 
be purchased. Notice is hereby given that National Band and Tag Company 
of Newport, Kentucky, is the authorized vendor of cage tags required 
for the fishing year 2018 Federal surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries. 
Detailed instructions for purchasing these cage tags will be provided 
in a letter to ITQ allocation holders in these fisheries from NMFS 
within the next several weeks.

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: October 11, 2017.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-22401 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20465 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MICHAEL MURRAY MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-632-1

-------------------- December 12, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Michael Murray Miller appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Relying on the Supreme Court’s decisions in Jones v. United States , 529 U.S. 848 (2000); United States v. Morrison , 529 U.S. 598 (2000); and United States v. Lopez , 514 U.S. 549 (1995), Miller argues that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional on its face because itNo. 02-20465 -2- does not require a “substantial” effect on interstate commerce. In the alternative, Miller argues that if 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is interpreted as implicitly requiring a “substantial” effect on interstate commerce, his indictment and the factual basis supporting his guilty plea are insufficient. Miller raises his arguments solely to preserve them for possible Supreme Court review. As he acknowledges, his arguments are foreclosed by existing Fifth Circuit precedent. See United States v. Cavazos , 288 F.3d 706, 712 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 123 S. Ct. 253 (2002); United States v. Daugherty , 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 1150 (2002); United States v. Gresham , 118 F.3d 258, 264-65 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Kuban , 94 F.3d 971, 973 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. Rawls , 85 F.3d 240, 242-43 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee's brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee's brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.