alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ex 10.2 12.9.14




Exhibit 10.2


December 4, 2014


Lynn Utter
East Greenville, PA


Dear Lynn:
It is my pleasure to inform you that you will be a participant in the 2015 Knoll, Inc. Incentive Compensation Program.
We are counting on you to help us build on the positive momentum we created in 2014 across each of our business segments. We must strive to continue to gain share, improve our profitability, target under-penetrated markets, expand our reach into consumer and decorator channels and build a responsible and technologically efficient infrastructure across all our businesses to position Knoll for success in 2015 and beyond.
If you achieve your individual goals, ONEKnoll and Supply Chain Transformation remain on track and on budget, Knoll makes its 2015 operating profit plan and Knoll’s Office segment exceeds its segment operating profit plan you can qualify for a total target incentive payout of $500,000.
This award is subject to my approval and that of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors (or appropriate committee of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors), which may exercise discretion in adjusting your award up or down based on factors the Board of Directors (or appropriate committee of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors) deems appropriate, including Knoll’s performance relative to the industry, other macroeconomic factors and your individual performance.  You must be employed by Knoll on the date this award is distributed in order to receive this incentive.
I have great confidence in your ability to contribute to our success in 2015 and look forward to being able to present you with your award in early 2016.
Thank you for all that you do for Knoll.
Sincerely,
/s/ Andrew Cogan
Andrew Cogan
CEO
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of CyberGuard Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Patrick J. Clawson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Patrick J. Clawson 
|Patrick J. Clawson     
|Chief Executive Officer
|September 9, 2004      



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CyberGuard Corporation and will be retained by Cyberguard Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Rodriguez, Appellant.

[860 NYS2d 30]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), rendered June 29, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of six years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). On the contrary, we find the evidence of guilt to be overwhelming. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The victim’s testimony was extensively corroborated by police observations and the recovery of physical evidence. Any discrepancies between the accounts of the incident given by the victim and by the officers were insignificant.

The court properly exercised its discretion in directing defense counsel to confine his summation to matters in evidence *(see People v Blount,*286 AD2d 649 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 701 [2002]). In particular, to the extent counsel sought to comment on the behavior of a spectator during the victim’s testimony, that behavior did not constitute evidence under the circumstances of the case *(see People v Ferguson,*82 NY2d 837 [1993]). The court did nothing to restrict counsel’s ability to comment on the demeanor of the victim or any other witness.

The court correctly interpreted a note from the deliberating jury as an inquiry into whether a partial verdict was permissible. Moreover, the note specifically referred to the jury’s inability to reach a verdict on one or more of the robbery counts. There was no reasonable possibility that the jury misunderstood, or was asking for further guidance on, the general requirement of unanimity. In any event, defendant could not *269have been prejudiced (see *People v Lourido,*70 NY2d 428, 435 [1987]) by the court’s failure to re-explain the need for a unanimous verdict, because the jury, which was polled, unanimously convicted him of assault and acquitted him of all other charges.

To the extent that defendant is raising constitutional claims relating to the summation and supplemental charge issues, such claims are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Lippman, EJ., Williams, Moskowitz and Acosta, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3382-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-3382-EM), dated August 28, 2017, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued September 10, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective September 10, 2017.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-21637 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-1828

___________________________

Rudy Butch Stanko, and similarly situated tax payers in Sheridan county;

Nebraska Beef Packers, Inc.,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

Brandi Bosselman, individually and in her official capacity as an officer of

Bosselman Pump & Pantry, Inc.; Smith, King, and Simmons, P.C., now known as

King, Simmons and Conn; Jamine Simmons, individually and in her official

capacity as a county attorney and also as a private lawyer and officer of the Smith,

King, and Simmons law firm, kna King, Simmons and Conn; Aaron Conn,

individually and in his official capacity as a deputy county attorney and as a

private lawyer in the named law firm or office; James McCave, individually and in

his official capacity as a deputy county attorney and as a private lawyer in the law

office or firm representing the Town of Hay Springs, etc.; State of Nebraska,

Sheridan County Attorney’s Office & Attorney General; Office of Sheridan

County Commissioners; Loren Paul, individually and in his official capacity as a

Sheridan County commissioner; Jack Anderson, individually and in his official

capacity as a Sheridan County commissioner; James Krotz, individually and in his

official capacity as a Sheridan County commissioner; Clay Heath, individually and

in his official capacity as a policeman for the City of Gordon,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees.

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________
Submitted: January 23, 2019

Filed: January 31, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Rudy Stanko and Nebraska Beef Packers, Inc. appeal the district court’s1

dismissal of this civil rights action under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1)

and (b)(6). Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on

appeal, we conclude the district court properly dismissed Stanko’s claims. We further

conclude that Nebraska Beef Packers, Inc. is not a proper party to this appeal, as it is

not represented by counsel, and a corporation may not appear pro se. See United

States v. Van Stelton, 988 F.2d 70, 70 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). Accordingly, we

affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the

1

District of Nebraska.

-2-
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7636

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JOSE JORGE ABBUD GORDINHO , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Beckley

. Irene C. Berger , District Judge. ( 5:15

- cr - 00237

- 1 ; 5:19

- cv - 00312 )

Submitted : April 27, 2021 Decided: April 30, 2021

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jose Jorge Abbud Gordinho , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Jo se Jorge Abbud Gordinho seeks to appeal the district c ourt’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely Gordinho’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Whiteside v. United States , 775 F.3d 180, 182

- 83 (4th Cir. 2014) (en banc) (explaining that § 2255 motions are subject to one - year statute of limitations, running from latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certifi cate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispos itive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gordinho has not made the requisite showing . Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
H. R. 3072 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 9810 Halls 

Ferry Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Coach Jodie Bailey Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. COACH JODIE BAILEY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 9810 Halls Ferry Road in St. Louis, Missouri, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Coach Jodie Bailey Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Coach Jodie Bailey Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2972 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2972

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 115 West Edward Street in Erath, Louisiana, as the ``Conrad DeRouen, 
                           Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONRAD DEROUEN, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 115 West Edward Street in Erath, Louisiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Conrad DeRouen, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Conrad 
DeRouen, Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2972

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 115 West Edward Street in Erath, Louisiana, as the ``Conrad DeRouen, 
                           Jr. Post Office''.
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2960 

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to pay an additional amount of assignment special pay to members of the Armed Forces who agree to serve 

in Afghanistan for up to six years or the duration of the United States 

mission in that country. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2009 

Mr. KIRK (for himself and Mr. LARSEN of Washington) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to pay an additional 

amount of assignment special pay to members of the 

Armed Forces who agree to serve in Afghanistan for 

up to six years or the duration of the United States 

mission in that country. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2960 IH

1 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL ASSIGNMENT PAY FOR MEMBERS 

2 AGREEING TO SERVE IN AFGHANISTAN FOR 

3 THE DURATION OF THE UNITED STATES MIS4 SION. 

5 (a) ADDITIONAL ASSIGNMENT PAY AUTHORIZED.— 

6 Notwithstanding the limitations specified in subsection (b) 

7 of section 352 of title 37, United States Code, on the max8 imum amount of assignment or special duty pay that may 

9 be paid to a member of the Armed Forces under such sec10 tion, the Secretary of Defense may authorize the payment 

11 of assignment pay in the total amount of $250,000 to a 

12 member who agrees to serve on active duty in Afghanistan 

13 for six years or the duration of the United States mission 

14 in Afghanistan, whichever occurs first. The assignment pe15 riod required by the agreement shall provide for reason16 able periods of leave. 

17 (b) INCREASED AMOUNTS FOR MEMBERS FLUENT IN

18 CERTAIN LANGUAGES.—If a member described in sub19 section (a) scores a 4.0 on the Foreign Service Institute 

20 test for the dominant languages of Pashto and Dari, the 

21 maximum amount of the assignment pay may be 

22 $500,000. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2921 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2921

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an 
annual review by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission on geographic 
                          access to services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2009

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an 
annual review by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission on geographic 
                          access to services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDPAC ANNUAL REVIEW OF GEOGRAPHIC ACCESS.

    Section 1805(b)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395b-
6(b)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (C);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (D); 
        and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(E) by not later than July 15 of each year 
                (beginning with 2010), submit a report to Congress 
                containing an evaluation, by Medicare administrative 
                contractor area, of access to care, quality of care, 
                increases or decreases in volume of services among such 
                areas and the potential effects of the Commission's 
                most recent policy recommendations under subparagraphs 
                (B) through (D) on access to care in such areas.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,874,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,895,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  9,527,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     137,164,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,147,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             191,857,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       36,849,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       114,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               191,857,000
<SALES>                                     67,742,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            93,095,000
<CGS>                                       53,352,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               70,971,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,715,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,819,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,590,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,411,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,179,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,269,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   910,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 24.1
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below hereby severally constitutes and appoints Wayne N. Snyder and Ben Coult,
and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Alliance Farms Cooperative Association for the fiscal year ended August 31,
1999, together with any and all amendments thereto and all documents relating
therewith, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing necessary or advisable to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

/s/ Wayne N. Snyder                          November 22, 1999

Wayne N. Snyder
Chairman of the Board, President
and Director
/s/ Merl Daniel                              November 12, 1999

Merl Daniel
Director
/s/ Loren Keppy                              November 10, 1999

Loren Keppy
Director
/s/ Larry Welsh                              November 8, 1999
Larry Welsh
Director