alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF QUEST EDUCATION CORPORATION FOR THE 9 MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,104
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,655
<PP&E>                                          24,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,606
<BONDS>                                         23,785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,008
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,090
<SALES>                                         64,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,008
<CGS>                                           54,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,028
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 980
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,171
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,172
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,999
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,999
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
<FN>
<F1>TAG (EPS-PRIMARY) DENOTES BASIC EPS.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4337-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-4337-DR), dated September 10, 2017, and related determinations.

# DATE:

The amendment was issued on September 18, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Willie G. Nunn, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency.

This action terminates the appointment of Justó Hernández as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-21648 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Order entered November 10, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00638-CV

TITO E. MARRERO, Appellant

V.

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-14549

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 8, 2022 “Motion Seeking Default 

Summary Judgment Against Bank of America and Jenifer Hope Wright for Failure 

to Answer Tito’s Petition Filed in the 193rd Violating Texas Civil Procedure.” 

This Court reviews judgments and other appealable orders from the trial court. It 

does not grant summary judgment. Accordingly, we DENY the motion.1

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE 

1 By letter issued today, the Court questions its jurisdiction over this appeal. The letter directs the parties 

to file letter briefs addressing the jurisdictional issue.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTERNET PICTURES CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          26,659
<SECURITIES>                                    44,037
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,211
<INVENTORY>                                        888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,774
<PP&E>                                          23,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 326,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,975
<BONDS>                                          1,630
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                     290,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   326,338
<SALES>                                         23,772
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,772
<CGS>                                           12,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                96,778
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   916
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (84,824)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (84,824)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (84,824)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.64)


</TABLE>
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-19-00018-CV

____________________

HEATHER RENEA CHEUNG, Appellant

V.

WILLIAM FAN CHEUNG, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 418th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 17-11-14222-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Appellant Heather Renea Cheung filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. This 

motion is voluntarily made by the appellant prior to any decision of this Court. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed notice of appeal. We grant the motion 

and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

______________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN

 Chief Justice
2

Submitted on February 20, 2019

Opinion Delivered February 21, 2019

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
EXHIBIT 23


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


      Reference is made to our report,  dated March 13, 1998,  relating to the
balance sheet of AIM Group,  Inc. (the name of which  subsequently was changed
to Cereus Technology  Partners,  Inc.) as of December 31, 1997 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the  years  ended  December  31,  1997  and  1996,  that was  included  in the
corporation's  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December  31,
1997. We hereby  consent to the inclusion of that report in the  corporation's
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1998.


Plantation, Florida
January 18, 2000                       M.A. Cabrera & Company P.A.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Simon, Appellant.

[610 NYS2d 769]

—Judgment, Supreme *303Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered December 11, 1991, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 4 Vi to 9 years, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 31, 1992, denying defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.20, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that he was denied his right to a speedy trial is not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05) and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. If we were to review it, we would find, first, that defendant’s plea of guilty operated as a waiver of his statutory right to a speedy trial *(People v Friscia,*51 NY2d 845, 847), and, second, that the claim is in any event without merit in view of, *inter alia,*the time spent on defense motions *(see, supra; People v Worley,*66 NY2d 523). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3044 

To impose an 18-month moratorium on the Home Valuation Code of Conduct. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2009 

Mr. CHILDERS (for himself and Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To impose an 18-month moratorium on the Home Valuation 

Code of Conduct. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MORATORIUM ON THE HOME VALUATION CODE 

4 OF CONDUCT. 

5 During the 18-month period beginning on the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act, the Home Valuation Code 

7 of Conduct announced by the Federal Housing Finance 

8 Agency on December 23, 2008, shall have no force or ef9 fect. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
----

Exhibit 13.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F ofMetallica Resources Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

> 
1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  registrant. 

Date: April 2, 2007 

/s/ Bradley J. Blacketor                                                      Bradley J. Blacketor Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theregistrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

----
WAYNE RICHARD LEIGHT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3997

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 13, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County

. Kelvin C. Wells , Judg e

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Angela R. Hensel, Assistant Attorney General, and Jillian H. Reding, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Speer v. State , 51 So. 3d 602 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

SWANSON

, OSTERHAUS

, and KELSEY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
#### Juan Carlos ARREOLA and Ana Myriam Arreola, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-73940.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 9, 2010.*

Filed March 15, 2011.

Joubin Nasseri, Nasseri Law Group, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

*733Sheri Robyn Glaser, Trial, Oil, Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr., Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Carlos Arreola and his wife Ana Maria Myrian Arreola, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of their third motion to reopen removal proceedings to apply for asylum and related relief. The BIA found that petitioners’ motion was untimely, and numerically barred, but noted that the limits did not apply to asylum applications based on changed country conditions.

Petitioners’ sole contention on appeal is that the BIA erred in denying their third motion to reopen because petitioners presented evidence of a well-founded fear of future persecution based on their membership in a social group comprised of “family members of a Mexican police officer who had been attacked and whose identity was known to his narco-criminal attackers.” Petitioners failed to establish that they qualify as a cognizable social group, and therefore did not demonstrate prima facie eligibility for the asylum, and related relief requested by petitioners. *See Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder,*600 F.3d 1148, 1151-52 (9th Cir.2010).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated February 14, 1997, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of A.S.V., Inc. on Form 10-
KSB for the year ended December 31, 1996.  We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
A.S.V., Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-94248, effective June 30, 1995 and File
No. 33-94250, effective July 3, 1995).



                                                          /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota 
March 24, 1997
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

REACCREDITATION OF THE 

PENNSYLVANIA BAR 

ASSOCIATION WORKERS' 

COMPENSATION LAW

SECTION

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 141

DISCIPLINARY RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of July, 2016, upon consideration of the recommendation 

of the Pennsylvania Bar Association Review and Certifying Board, the Pennsylvania Bar 

Association Workers’ Compensation Law Section is hereby reaccredited as a certifying 

organization in the area of Workers’ Compensation Law for a period of five years 

commencing January 12, 2017.
Exhibit
      ___




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




I,
      Gary
      Herman, certify that:





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Creative Development Corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the
      "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                October 9, 2007/s/ Gary
              HermanGary
              HermanPresident
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jack B. Binion, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                                                                            
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: /s/ Jack B. Binion

Jack B. Binion, Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                       Exhibit 8

                           Subsidiaries of the Company

Following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company, ownership percentages, and
the jurisdictions of incorporation or organization of each as of May 10, 2004.
Each subsidiary does business in its own name only.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Jurisdiction of Incorporation
        Subsidiary                                    or Organization
        ----------                                    ---------------
<S>                                               <C>
MMM Exploraciones S.A. de C.V. (100%)                    Mexico
Metallica (Barbados) Inc. (100%)                         Barbados
De Re Holdings Inc. (100%)                               British Virgin Islands
Metallica Brasil Ltda. (100%)                            Brazil
Desarrollos Metallica C.A. (100%)                        Venezuela
  (Inactive)
Datawave Sciences Inc.                                   British Virgin Islands
Minera Metallica Ltda. (100%)                            Chile
Metallica Management Inc. (100%)                         Colorado, U.S.A.
Raleigh Mining International Ltd. (100%)                 Canada
Minera San Xavier, S.A. de C.V. (100%)                   Mexico
Servicios del Plata y Oro, S.A. de C.V. (100%)           Mexico
</TABLE>
#### Jose AGUILAR-LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72899.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 15, 2011.

Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo, Esquire, Law Office of Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Gladys Marta Steffens Guzman, Esquire, Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr., Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office Of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Aguilar-Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for. review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Aguilar-Lopez’s motion to reopen as time— and number-barred because the successive motion was filed more than 17 years after the BIA’s March 19, 1991, order dismissing the underlying appeal, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(e)(2) (only one motion to reopen permitted and the motion generally must be filed within 90 days of the final order or on or before September 30, 1996, whichever is later), and Aguilar-Lopez failed to establish grounds for equitable tolling, *see Iturribarria,*321 F.3d at 897 (equitable tolling available “when a petitioner is prevented from filing because of *724deception, fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence”).

Aguilar-Lopez’s remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.