alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3021 

To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and amendments to 

that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2009 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and 

amendments to that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Citizens Protection Act 

5 of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE GUN-FREE SCHOOL ZONES ACT OF 

7 1990 AND AMENDMENTS TO THAT ACT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 922 of title 18, United 

9 States Code, is amended by striking subsection (q). 

10 (b) RELATED AMENDMENTS.— 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3021 IH

1 (1) Section 921(a) of such title is amended by 

2 striking paragraphs (25) through (27) and redesig3 nating paragraphs (28), (29), and (32) through (35) 

4 as paragraphs (25) through (30), respectively. 

5 (2) Section 924(a) of such title is amended— 

6 (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘(k), 

7 or (q)’’ and inserting ‘‘or (k)’’; and 

8 (B) by striking paragraph (4) and redesig9 nating paragraphs (5) through (7) as para10 graphs (4) through (6), respectively. 

11 (3) The Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 

12 (18 U.S.C. 921 note, 922 note; section 1702 of Pub13 lic Law 101–647; 104 Stat. 4844–4845) is repealed. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
WAYNE RICHARD LEIGHT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3997

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 13, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County.

Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Angela R. Hensel, Assistant Attorney General, 

and Jillian H. Reding, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Speer v. State, 51 So. 3d 602 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). 

SWANSON, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM














The Board
of Directors and Stockholders


Cecil
Bancorp, Inc.


Elkton,
Maryland








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements on
Numbers 333-35120 on Form S-3 and 333-159419, 333-153227 and 33-81374 on
Forms S-8 of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries (Cecil Bancorp) of our
report dated March 24, 2010, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Cecil Bancorp as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the
years then ended, which report is included in the December 31, 2009 annual
report on Form 10-K of Cecil Bancorp.



















Baltimore,
Maryland


March 24,
2010
Exhibit 32.1 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to****18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

*            *I, VincentC. Smith, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of QuestSoftware, Inc. 

|   | By:    | /s/    VINCENT C. SMITH |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                             |
|   | Name:  | **Vincent C. Smith**                        |
|   | Title: | **Chief Executive Officer**                 |
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Edward Dickinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Edward Dickinson


Edward
      H.
      Dickinson


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      15, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6705

CHARLES RAY CARTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOE MITCHELL, Sheriff of the York County

Sheriff’s Department; JAMES TEDDY, Lieutenant;

BILLY DONAHUE, Correctional Officer; R. HILL,

Correctional Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr, District

Judge. (CA-95-2898-6-20)

Submitted: August 20, 2004 Decided: August 27, 2004

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Ray Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Keith Wray, II,

GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Charles Ray Carter appeals the district court’s order

denying Carter’s motion to reopen this action, in which a jury

verdict was returned in 1996. Our review of the record discloses

no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Rashid Stafford, Appellant, v Brian Fischer, Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[987 NYS2d 284]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered January 23, 2013 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Matter of DeJesus v Evans,*111 AD3d 1340 [2013]).

Present — Scudder, EJ., Fahey, Carni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 10.31

Confidential portions of this document indicated by ***** have been omitted and
filed separately with the Commission


ALUMINUM SHAPES
An Arch America Company



         TO:      Gary Ihrke / Craig Lepa - Featherlite

         FROM:    Scott Kendall

         DATE:    March 23, 2001

         RE:      Metal Pricing



                  Quantity:      ***** pounds
                  Deliver:       ***** pounds (3rd Qtr. 2001)
                                 ***** pounds (4th Qtr. 2001)

                  Price:         Solids:        Based on $*****
                                 Hollows:       "      " $*****

         Also, the shortfall of ***** # will be used by June 30, 2001, with a
$***** increase per month to cover carrying charges. We fully understand
business conditions "stink", so I'm hoping you find the above satisfactory.




Agreed upon


/s/ Craig Lepa
-----------------
Gary Ihrke / Craig Lepa




              ALUMINUM SHAPES LLC 9000 River Road Delair, NJ 08110
                         856-662-5500 Fax: 856-662-8934
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      10,581,849
<SECURITIES>                                 2,025,986
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,464
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,261,429
<PP&E>                                         674,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                 294,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,406,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,050,258
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    18,753,141
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,406,237
<SALES>                                         97,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,933
<CGS>                                          176,985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,739,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,797,453)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,797,453)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,797,453)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.56)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification PursuantTo 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Polymer Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/AAmendment No. 2 for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, William B. Hewitt, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: April 5, 2007 | /s/ William  B. Hewitt                             |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                | William B. Hewitt*Interim Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
#### In the Matter of Matthew Lowe, Petitioner, v John J. Doherty, as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Sanitation, et al., Respondents.

[859 NYS2d 76]

Determination of respondent Commissioner of New York City Department of Sanitation, dated October 17, 2007, terminating respondent’s employment as a sanitation worker, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.], entered June 12, 2007), dismissed, without costs.

The finding that petitioner solicited and accepted a gratuity in exchange for collecting trade waste is supported by substantial evidence *(see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 181-182 [1978]), including the testimony of the undercover investigators who conducted an “integrity test” on petitioner and the audio recording they made of the test. No basis exists to disturb the hearing officer’s findings of credibility *(cf. Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]). The penalty of termination does not shock the conscience *(cf. Cranford v Sexton,*159 AD2d 348, 349 [1990]). Concur—Andrias, J.P, Gonzalez, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.
Exhibit 24.1
    Signature
    
    Title/s/ Jacques-François Martin

Jacques-François Martin
    
    Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)March 28, 2011/s/ Ronald Kempers

Ronald Kempers
    
    Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)March 28, 2011/s/ Sylvain Fleury

Sylvain Fleury, Ph.D.
    
    Chief Scientific Officer and DirectorMarch 28, 2011/s/ Ernest Stern

Ernest Stern
    
    DirectorMarch 28, 2011/s/ Dr. Thomas Staehelin

Thomas Staehelin
    
    DirectorMarch 28, 2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-11088

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LARRY SHANE ROBINSON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-83-1

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Larry Shane Robinson

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Robinson has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 26, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-11088 Document: 00511274381 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010
Exhibit 21

BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA    LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

|COMPANY                                       |                                          | STATE OF
INCORPORATION
|--------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ----------------------
|BMCA Insulation Products Inc.                 |                                          | Delaware              
|Building Materials Investment Corporation     |                                          | Delaware              
|Building Materials Manufacturing Corporation  |                                          | Delaware              
|GAF Leatherback Corp.                         |                                          | Delaware              
|GAF Materials Corporation (Canada)            |                                          | Delaware              
|GAF Premium Products Inc.                     |                                          | Delaware              
|                                              | Wind Gap Real Property Acquisition Corp. |                       
|GAF Real Properties, Inc.                     |                                          | Delaware              
|GAFTECH Corporation                           |                                          | Delaware              
|LL Building Products Inc.                     |                                          | Delaware              
|                                              | Ductwork Manufacturing Corporation       |                       
|Pequannock Valley Claim Service Company, Inc. |                                          | Delaware              
|South Ponca Realty Corp.                      |                                          | Delaware              

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.1**

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

     The undersigned, Charles M. Sprock, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”). This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by theCompany of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”). 

     By execution of this statement, I certify that: 

|   | A)     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                |  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U. S. C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
| B)     |   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report. |

     This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Skuli Thorvaldsson, certify that:

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Creative Development Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September 30, 2003 (the
"Report"),  the undersigned  officer of the Company,  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 7, 2006

/s/ Skuli Thorvaldsson
-----------------------------
Skuli Thorvaldsson
Chief Financial Officer
#### Murray *vs.*Purdy.

Where a suit was brought for services rendered, and the opinions .of the witnesses sworn differed as to the value of such services, and the jury found a medium sum between the extremes of testimony, and the presiding judge approved the finding, this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

January 6, 1885.

Jackson, Chief Justice.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joane Delinois, Appellant.

[859 NYS2d 891]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), imposed April 12, 2007, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Prudenti, PJ., Ritter, Covello and Dickerson, JJ, concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Polymer Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal
year ended January 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Veronica M. Hagen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date: August 17, 2010

/s/ VERONICA M. HAGEN Veronica M. Hagen Chief Executive Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Casimiro A. Solis, Appellant.

[859 NYS2d 383]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), dated February 10, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court’s determination to designate him a level two sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *People v Ortega,*49 AD3d 704 [2008]; *People v Bula,*41 AD3d 569 [2007]). Rivera, J.P, Ritter, Miller and Dillon, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lonny McDonald, Also Known as Lonny MacDonald, Appellant.

[667 NYS2d 266]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 20, 1993 *{People v McDonald,*199 AD2d 420), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 10, 1991.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, *Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Rosenblatt and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sun NewMedia, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Bruno Wu Zheng, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;and

2.       The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Bruno Wu Zheng                                              |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Bruno Wu Zheng, Executive Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |
| Date: February 14, 2007                                         |

 

----