alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47593-47594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22121]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Release Certain Properties From All Terms, 
Conditions, Reservations and Restrictions of a Quitclaim Deed Agreement 
Between Sarasota Manatee Airport Authority and the Federal Aviation 
Administration for the Sarasota-Bradenton International Airport, 
Sarasota, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release certain 
airport properties 6.49 acres at the Sarasota-Bradenton International 
Airport, Sarasota, FL from the conditions, reservations, and 
restrictions as contained in a Quitclaim Deed agreement between the FAA 
and the Sarasota Manatee Airport Authority, dated December 16, 1947. 
The release of property will allow Sarasota Manatee Airport Authority 
to dispose of the property for other than aeronautical purposes. The 
property is located 1361 West University Parkway in Manatee County. The 
parcel is currently designated as commercial/industrial land. The 
property will be released of its federal obligations for commercial 
development. The fair market value of this parcel has been determined 
to be $1,265,000.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by 
appointment only, for inspection at the Sarasota-Bradenton 
International Airport and the FAA Airports District Office.

DATES: Comments are due on or before November 13, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at Sarasota-Bradenton 
International Airport, and the FAA Airports District Office, 5950 
Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822. Written 
comments on the Sponsor's request must be delivered or mailed to: Pedro 
Blanco, Community Planner, Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 
Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Blanco, Community Planner, 
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 
400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to 
the ``waiver'' or

[[Page 47594]]

``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to use certain 
airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

Bart Vernace,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2017-22121 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40567 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TERRY ANDERSON, also known as Terri Blackburn, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:96-CR-50-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 12, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Terry Anderson appeals her sentence for her conviction of conspiracy to manufacture with intent to distribute methamphetamine. She argues that the district court clearly erred in finding that she possessed a firearm during the commission of the drug offense. The presentence report (PSR) was sufficiently reliable in demonstrating, and Anderson presented no evidence to rebut, thatNo. 97-40567 -2- the gun was found in her residence, that her residence was a known site for drug distributions during the drug conspiracy, and that the conspiracy existed at the time the gun was found. The district court’s two-level enhancement of Anderson’s base offense under the United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2D1.1(b)(1) was not clear error. See United States v. Caicedo , 103 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir. 1997); see also United States v. Puig-Infante , 19 F.3d 929, 943 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of SRS Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), UlrichGottschling, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  November 4, 2010 |   |                     |                    |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|-------------------------|
|                         |   | By:                      | /s/  Ulrich Gottschling |
|                         |   | Ulrich  Gottschling      |
|                         |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, M. Brinkley Morse, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.



|                   |  |        |  |                                                                   
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2004 |  | By:    |  | /s/    M. BRINKLEY MORSE                                          
|                   |  | Name:  |  | M. Brinkley Morse                                                 
|                   |  | Title: |  | Vice President, Finance and Operations and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to****18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

*          *I, Vincent C. Smith,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.

|   | By:    | /s/ VINCENT C. SMITH                                                   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                        |
|   | Name:  | **Vincent C. Smith**                                                   |
|   | Title: | **Vice President, Finance and Operations and Chief Executive Officer** |
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-2084

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from United States * District Court of the Western John D. Berry, also known as * District of Missouri. Tony A. Ruff, also known as * Darrell L. Berry, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 14, 2011 Filed: April 6, 2011

___________ Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. John Berry appeals from the sentence of 18 months imposed on him for committing a crime while on supervised rel ease following his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He asserts that the sentence was unreasonable. We disagree and affirm.The district court 1 found, and Mr. Berry admitted, that Mr. Berry repeatedly threatened to harm or kill a woman resident at a re-entry center. The policy statements in Chapter 7 of the United States Senten cing Guidelines, which apply to revocations of supervised release, recommend a senten ce of 7 to 13 months' imprisonment in the circumstances of this case. See U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4. But th ese policy statements, though they must be taken into account in fixing a sentence, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(4)(B), are not binding, and we review a sentence imposed for the violation of supervised release for an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Thunder , 553 F.3d 605, 607 (8th Cir. 2009). Here, the sentencing recordreveals that the district court was well aware of all the relevant considerations in § 3553(a) that bear on sentencing following revocation of supervised release, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), and carefully weighed them in fixing the sentence. In particular, th e court alluded to Mr. Berry's extensive criminal history, the likelihood that he w ould commit further crimes, and the need to protect the public. The nature of the crimes that Mr. Berry committed on supervised release also influenced the district court's decision, because Mr. Berry's criminal history included sexual assaults. Mr. Berry, moreover, displayed truculence at sentencing, which provided evidence of hi s incorrigibility. There is no abuse of discretion here. See Thunder , 553 F.3d at 608-09.

Affirmed.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                          40,878
<SECURITIES>                                     7,788
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                       512
<INVENTORY>                                      1,278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,584
<PP&E>                                          15,061
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,781
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,831
<SALES>                                         24,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,060
<CGS>                                           16,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,436)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,436)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.82)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.20





 


 


Direct
Dial: 502/261-4293


Fax:
502/261-4324


E-mail:
kimberly_winebrenner@papajohns. com


 


September
5, 2014


 


VIA
EMAIL - kantos@cox.net


 


Mr.
Kenneth Antos


PRB I LLC


5148
Spanish Heights Drive


Las Vegas, NV 89148


 





RE:      Development
Agreement dated March 17, 2014, as amended




 


Dear Mr. Antos:


 


Attached
for execution is an Amendment to Development Agreement. The Amendment adds one additional traditional store in Lemoore, California.
Please obtain the necessary signature on the Amendment through DocuSign. After signing, please forward your $2,500 deposit fee
payment to me at Papa John’s International, Inc., 2002 Papa John’s Boulevard, Louisville, KY 40299, Attn: Kim Winebrenner
or if you prefer, I will ask our finance team to ACH the payment from your account. If you choose to ACH the payment, please email
me with the authorization to do so and confirm which account you would like that payment drawn from.


 


Please
note that we must receive the fully executed Amendment and your payment no later than September 16, 2014. If we do not receive
the signed Amendment by that date, our offer to amend your Development Agreement will be automatically revoked and become null
and void.


 


If
you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you for your prompt attention to this
matter.


 


Very
truly yours,


 


PAPA
JOHN’S INTERNATIONAL, INC.


/s/ Kim
Winebrenner


Kim
Winebrenner


Sr.
Legal and Franchise Contract Administrator


 


Enclosures 


	cc:	Simon Smith
	 	Al Randazzo
	 	Don Graham
	 	Joe Smith
	 	Joni Dalton
	 	Vicki Resnik
	 	Molly Small
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 21, 2009

s1214 

# Order

December 21, 2009

139089

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139089 COA: 282485 Wayne CC: 06-002379-FC GEORGE KARVELIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  DERIVED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-QSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000    
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         4,583 
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        11,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               6,350
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   41,051
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        22,176
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          22,278
<LOANS>                                       77,965
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               165,925
<DEPOSITS>                                   138,893
<SHORT-TERM>                                       0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            5,198
<LONG-TERM>                                    1,706
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         145
<OTHER-SE>                                    19,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               165,925
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                3,113
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2,149
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 270
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               5,532
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,849
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                59
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,624
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     50
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,869
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  898
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       898
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     567
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .46  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  7.31
<LOANS-NON>                                      573
<LOANS-PAST>                                       0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,127
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      0
<RECOVERIES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,142
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             506
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          636
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3038 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3038

 To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1991 with respect to the application 
                              of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2009

Mr. McDermott introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committee on 
   the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1991 with respect to the application 
                              of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for Wards Cove Workers 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 402 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (42 U.S.C. 1981 note) 
is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``(a) In General.--''; 
        and
            (2) by striking subsection (b).

SEC. 3. APPLICATION AND CONSTRUCTION.

    (a) Application.--For purposes of determining the application of 
the amendments made by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, such amendments 
shall apply to a case that was subject to section 402(b) of the Civil 
Rights Act of 1991 (as in effect on the day before the date of 
enactment of this Act) in the same manner and to the same extent as 
such amendments apply to any case brought under title VII of the Civil 
Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.) that was not subject to 
section 402(b) of the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
    (b) Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to alter, 
or shall be considered to be evidence of, congressional intent 
regarding the application of such amendments to any case that was not 
subject to section 402(b) of the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001016277
<NAME> NATIONAL PROCESSING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          33,976
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,606
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,735
<PP&E>                                          83,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                (48,932)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,047
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     187,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   275,813
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,704
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  124,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,126
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,915
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,211
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,211
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>