alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Knarik Varuzhani SHABOYAN, a.k.a. Knarik Varuzhani Petrosyan, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-72351.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 7, 2011.

Peter Singh, Esquire, Peter Singh & Associates, P.C., Fresno, CA, for Petitioner.

Brianne Whelan Cohen, Oil, Carol Federighi, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, Mona Maria Yousif, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Offiee of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*662Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Knarik Varuzhani Shaboyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings and review de novo legal determinations. *Wakkary v. Holder,*558 F.8d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that the incidents in which Shaboyan was forced to the back of the food line and rocks were thrown at the house of the Pentecostal congregation gatherings, even considered cumulatively, did not constitute persecution. *See Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir.2003). Substantial evidence further supports the BIA’s finding that the harm to her husband and family members were not part of “a pattern of persecution closely tied to” Shaboyan. *See Wakkary,*558 F.3d at 1060. In addition, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Shaboyan’s fear of future persecution was not objectively reasonable. *See Nagoulko,*333 F.3d at 1018. Accordingly, Shaboyan’s asylum claim fails.

Because Shaboyan failed to establish her eligibility for asylum, she necessarily fails to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2006).

Finally, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Shaboyan did not establish a likelihood of torture by, at the instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of the Armenian government. *See Wakkary,*558 F.3d at 1067-68. Accordingly, Shaboyan’s CAT claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000059440
<NAME> BROOKE GROUP LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,123
<SECURITIES>                                    64,429
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     45,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               188,732
<PP&E>                                         197,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (43,124)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 504,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          226,654
<BONDS>                                        148,349
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,199
<OTHER-SE>                                    (133,098)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   504,448
<SALES>                                        567,045
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               567,045
<CGS>                                          189,865
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  305,177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               295,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (54,378)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                313,075
<INCOME-TAX>                                    82,458
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            236,084
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,249
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,660)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   235,673
<EPS-BASIC>                                      10.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.80


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, John L. Finlayson, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March31, 2005 of Susquehanna Media Co.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 c.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  d.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  e.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
 6.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.       Date: May 13, 2005   /s/ John L. Finlayson          John L. Finlayson     Vice President and CFO
Exhibit 32.2  Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Entheos Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel Rayat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  ENTHEOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date: August 10, 2007By:/s/ Harmel RayatHarmel Rayat
Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.      SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,                2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the“Periodic                Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the                end of                the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations                of the                Company for the period covered by the Periodic                Report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                November 13, 2008                         |   |                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                            |   |                                                                 |
| /s/                Peter A. Michel                              |   | /s/                Lincoln Zehr                                      |
|                                                            |   |                                                                 |
|                     Peter A. Michel         |   |                     Lincoln Zehr                 |
|                     Chief Executive Officer |   |      Chief                Financial Officer |

----
#### In the Matter of Shariyf W., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[665 NYS2d 588]

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Elkins, J.), dated January 29, 1997, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated March 1, 1996, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of criminal mischief in the fourth degree and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree, an order of the same court dated March 1, 1996, placing the appellant on probation for 12 months, and the appellant’s admission that he violated a condition of his probation by failing to report to his probation officer, placed him with the Division for Youth for a period of up to 12 months.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We disagree with the appellant’s contention that his place*384ment should have been less restrictive. The Family Court has broad discretion in entering dispositional orders (see, Family Ct Act § 141). Here, the Family Court carefully considered the least restrictive alternatives to the appellant’s placement, consistent with the best interests of the juvenile and the need for protection of the community (see, Family Ct Act § 352.2; *Matter of Katherine*W., 62 NY2d 947; *Matter of Jason*W., 207 AD2d 495). Accordingly, it cannot be said that the Family Court improvidently exercised its discretion in placing the appellant with the Division for Youth (see, *Matter of Jamil W.,*184 AD2d 513). Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
[No. 65606-6-I.

Division One.

November 5, 2012.]

#### Raymond A. Hovick et al., *Respondents,*v. Walter S. Page, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Island County, No. 09-2-00492-1, Vickie I. Churchill, J., entered April 23,2010. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Lau, J.,

concurred in by Leach, C.J., and Appelwick, J.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

BEXAR COUNTY, et al.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR., as Administrator and 

Individually as Heir to the Estate of Johnnie Mae 

King,

Defendant-Appellant

______________________

2022-2211

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Western District of Texas in No. 5:22-cv-00374-XR, Judge 

Xavier Rodriguez.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Appellees move to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Rowland J. Martin, Jr. opposes the motion.

This appeal stems from a 2014 Texas state court action 

filed by state tax authorities against Mr. Martin regarding 

a dispute over real property in Bexar County, Texas. In 

Case: 22-2211 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 11/23/2022
2 BEXAR COUNTY v. MARTIN

April 2022, Mr. Martin removed the case to the United 

States District Court for the Western District of Texas. 

The district court granted appellees’ motion to remand for 

lack of subject matter jurisdiction, denied Mr. Martin’s motion for reconsideration, and remanded the case to state 

court. This appeal followed.

We lack jurisdiction over this appeal. This court generally has jurisdiction only over district court cases arising 

under the patent laws, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil actions on review to the district court from the United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, § 1295(a)(4)(C); or certain 

cases against the United States for claims “not exceeding 

$10,000 in amount,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), see 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1295(a)(2). Although Mr. Martin’s notice of appeal references § 1346, that provision is not applicable here because 

the United States is not a party to this action. Nor can 

jurisdiction on this matter be predicated on the “Big Tucker 

Act,” ECF No. 1-2, because that provision applies only to

claims presented to the United States Court of Federal 

Claims, see 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1). Finally, to the extent 

that Mr. Martin’s response argues that this court has jurisdiction in this case based on its jurisdiction over his separate appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of 

Federal Claims, we must reject that argument. 

When we lack jurisdiction, we will transfer the case to 

another court where the case “could have been brought at 

the time it was filed,” “if it is in the interest of justice.” 28 

U.S.C. § 1631. Here, however, Mr. Martin already filed an 

appeal with the appropriate regional circuit, the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Appeal 

No. 22-50718.

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Case: 22-2211 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 11/23/2022
BEXAR COUNTY v. MARTIN 3

 November 23, 2022 

 Date

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 23, 2022

Case: 22-2211 Document: 15 Page: 3 Filed: 11/23/2022
Exhibit 32.3
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of National Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership (“NPAMLP”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Simon, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of EBL&S Property Management, Inc., Agent for NPAMLP and the equivalent of its Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NPAMLP.
 
 National Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership(Registrant)Date:
March 30, 2011By:
EBL&S Property Management, Inc., Agent for NPAMLPBy:
/s/ David A. SimonName: David A. SimonTitle:   Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                             3818742
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       134095
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   3952837
<PP&E>                                              545885
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (201888)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     9023242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               156693
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          17117560
<OTHER-SE>                                        (8251011)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       9023242
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    606644
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    5629
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (612273)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (612273)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (612273)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0<F1>
        
<FN>
<F1>
Fully diluted EPS not computed on loss.
</FN>

</TABLE>
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 


Addendum to Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release of All Claims


Executed Between MyGO Games Holding Co., My Go Games, LLC, Daniel J. Hammett, and Great Outdoors, LLC (the “Original Settlement Agreement”).







WHEREAS, MyGo Games, LLC (“MyGo LLC”), MyGo Games Holding Co. (“MyGo Holding”), Daniel Hammett, and Great Outdoors, LLC (collectively, the “Parties”), entered into the Original Settlement Agreement on October 31, 2014, to resolve certain disputes between them;







WHEREAS, on June 19, 2014, Great Outdoors, OBJ Enterprises, Inc., and MyGo LLC entered into a share exchange agreement whereupon MyGo LLC became a wholly owned subsidiary of OBJ, OBJ changed its name to MyGo Holding, and Great Outdoors received fifty million, three hundred twenty-three thousand, five hundred twenty-six (50,323,526) shares of OBJ, now known as MyGo Holding (the “Share Exchange”).







WHEREAS, the Parties seek to clarify the Original Settlement Agreement and Share Exchange Agreement;







WHEREAS, this Addendum does not amend, alter, or modify the Original Settlement Agreement;







NOW THEREFORE, for clarity and removal of doubt, the Parties hereby stipulate that the terms of the Original Settlement Agreement were to address certain claims and grievances as follows:








	
1.  

	
Hammett agreed to surrender all options and any other monies owed under his employment contract with MyGo Games, LLC, in order to settle and resolve certain allegations raised by MyGo Games LLC and MyGo Games Holding Co. in Cause No. D-1-GN-14-003406, previously pending in the District Court of Travis County, Texas;







 



	
2.  

	
As a post-closing adjustment to the Share Exchange between the Parties dated June 19, 2014, the Parties agreed (i) to adjust the purchase price from 50,323,526 shares of MyGO to 7,500,000 shares of MyGO, (ii) to amend the transfer of liabilities to include claims by Umur Ozal in the amount of $500,000 in principal, Shahid Ramzan in the amount of $100,000 in principal, and certain other Great Outdoors note holders who were sent note exchange agreements on June 20, 2014, totaling $400,000 in principal, and (iii) to amend the transfer of liabilities to include certain legal expenses incurred by Great Outdoors, LLC;







 



	
3.  

	
These post-closing adjustments are related to additional diligence post-closing that uncovered material information that resulted in an adjustment to the value of assets purchased and liabilities assumed from Great Outdoors, LLC by My Go Games, LLC.







 




  





  











  






 


IN WITNESS HEREOF, the undersigned have affixed their signatures this 6th day of November, 2014.









	
DANIEL HAMMETT

	
MYGO GAMES HOLDING CO.

	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
By:                                                                                   

	


By:                                                                                   



	  
	  	  	  
	
GREAT OUTDOORS, LLC

	
MYGO GAMES, LLC

	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	


By:                                                                                   



	


By: