alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21796]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Indian Health Service


Behavioral Health Integration Initiative (BH2I); Extension of Due 
Dates

AGENCY: Indian Health Service, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; extension of due dates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Indian Health Service published a notice in the Federal 
Register (FR) on August 14, 2017, for the Fiscal Year 2017 Behavioral 
Health Integration Initiative (BH2I), Funding Announcement Number: HHS-
2017-IHS-BH2I-0001. Several Key Dates have been modified.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gettys, Grant Systems 
Coordinator, 5600 Fishers Lane, Mail Stop: 09E70, Rockville, MD 20857, 
Phone: (301) 443-2114; or the Division of Grants Management (301) 443-
5204, or Fax: (301) 594-0899.

Correction

    In the FR notice of August 14, 2017, (FR 2017-17103), the 
corrections are made:
    On page 37870, in the first column, under the heading Key Dates, 
the correction for Application Deadline Date, Review Date, Earliest 
Anticipated Start Date, Signed Tribal Resolutions Due Date, and Proof 
of Non-Profit Status Due Date should read as:
    <bullet> Application Deadline Date: September 18, 2017.
    <bullet> Review Date: September 19, 2017.
    <bullet> Earliest Anticipated Start Date: September 30, 2017.
    <bullet> Signed Tribal Resolutions Due Date: September 18, 2017.
    <bullet> Proof of Non-Profit Status Due Date: September 18, 2017.

    Dated: September 29, 2017.
 Michael D. Weahkee,
 RADM, Assistant Surgeon General, U.S. Public Health Service, Acting 
Director, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-21796 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4165-16-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the audited
consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations as of and for the
fifty-two week period ended December 27, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety 
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          89,201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    309,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               660,782
<PP&E>                                       7,840,379
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,952,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,703,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,360,206
<BONDS>                                         46,194
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,675
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,495,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,703,770
<SALES>                                      3,936,078
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,951,454
<CGS>                                        1,379,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,135,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,798
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (222,569)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (222,569)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (222,569)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-04-312-CV

IN RE EDDIE ARTHUR CROSS						   RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL B: MCCOY, HOLMAN, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: OCTOBER 26, 2004
Exhibit 32.1
                                                              ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Altair  Nanotechnologies  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Rudi E. Moerck, President of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Rudi E. Moerck
----------------------------
Rudi E. Moerck
President
August 13, 2004
Exhibit 32.2




Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Entheos Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on the Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Frank Fabio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





(i)    
     the Report filed by the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





(ii)         The
information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates
and for the periods presented therein.





ENTHEOS TECHNOLOGIES,
      INC.Date:November 14,
      2008
                    By:
                    /s/ Frank FabioFrank
      Fabio
                      Chief Financial
      Officer and
Secretary





This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME CouRT ELIZABETH A. ROW BY: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ASHLY SLOAN-BRINKLEY, Appellant, vs. AMAL SRIVASTAVA, Respondent. No. 83083 

# FILE JAN 2 4 2022

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Cause appearing, appellant's motion for a voluntary dismissal of this appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED.

cc: Hon. Sandra A. Unsworth, District Judge, Family Court Division Margaret M. Crowley, Settlement Judge Woodburn & Wedge Kathleen T. Breckenridge Viloria, Oliphant, Oster & Aman L.L.P. Washoe District Court Clerk

Sl1PREME COUR I
. or NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER 

## - 0 3 2 2
#### In the Matter of Samuel LaSalle, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[858 NYS2d 919]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia, Jr., J.), entered October 10, 2007 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging an April 2006 determination of the Board of Parole which denied his request for parole release. Supreme Court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition as moot and petitioner now appeals.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Board in March 2008 and was again denied parole release and ordered held for an additional 24 months. As such, this appeal must be dismissed as moot *(see*
      *1072
      *Matter of Lebron v Travis,*47 AD3d 1142 [2008], *lv denied*10 NY3d 707 [2008]; *Matter of Malangone v Dennison,*46 AD3d 1155 [2007]). Furthermore, contrary to petitioner’s contention, the circumstances presented here do not implicate an exception to the mootness doctrine.

Mercure, J.E, Carpinello, Lahtinen, Kane and Kavanágh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 17, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 17, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0480. ANTHONY B. MOORE v. JANEENE H. MOORE-MCKINNEY.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

14CV00232
Exhibit
21   BUILDING
MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA LIST OF
SUBSIDIARIES  COMPANY
  
  STATE OFINCORPORATIONBMCA Insulation Products Inc.
  
  DelawareBMCA Receivables Corporation
  
  DelawareBuilding Materials Investment Corporation
  
  DelawareBuilding Materials Manufacturing Corporation
  
  DelawareGAF Leatherback Corp.
  
  DelawareGAF Materials Corporation (Canada)
  
  DelawareGAF Premium Products Inc.
  
  DelawareWind Gap Real
  Property Acquisition Corp.
  
  DelawareGAF Real Properties Inc.
  
  DelawareGAFTECH Corporation
  
  DelawareLL Building Products Inc.
  
  DelawareDuctwork
  Manufacturing Corporation
  
  DelawarePequannock Valley Claim Service Company, Inc.
  
  DelawareSouth Ponca Realty Corp.
  
  Delaware
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification PursuantTo 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Polymer Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/AAmendment No. 2 for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Willis C. Moore, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: April 5, 2007 | /s/ Willis  C. Moore, III                     |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                | Willis C. Moore, III*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
EXHIBIT 10:20



Confidential portions of this document indicated by ***** have been omitted and filed separately with the Commission



AMDENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT FOR WHOLESALE

FINANCING

(Amendment No. 1)



This Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement for Wholesale Financing
(Amendment) is made by and between Deutsche Financial Services Corporation (DFS) and Featherlite Mfg., Inc. (Dealer).



WHEREAS, DFS and Dealer entered into that certain Amended and Restated Agreement for Wholesale Financing dated October 6,
1997 (Agreement); and



WHEREAS, DFS and
Dealer desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein.



NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, DFS and Dealer agree as follows:



1. Amendment of Leverage Ratio. Paragraph 13.1 (b) of the
Agreement is deleted and amended to read units entirety as follows:



(b) on and after December 31, 1997, a ratio of Debt minus Subordinated Debt to Tangible Net Worth and Subordinated Debt of not more than THREE to ONE (3:1); and



2. No Other Modifications. Except as expressly modified or amended herein, all other terms and provisions of the
Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect and the Agreement, as hereby amended, is ratified and confirmed by DFS and Dealer.



3. Capitalized Terms. Except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms will have the same meanings set forth in the Agreement.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, DFS and Dealer have executed this Amendment as of the
1stday of April, 1998.



DEUTSCHE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION



|                      |  |                 
|--------------------- |  | ----------------
|FEATHERLITE MFG., INC
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | \s\ C Clement   
|Name:                 |  | Conrad D Clement
|Title:                |  | President
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 3, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D20-1093 & 3D20-1130

Lower Tribunal No. 18-41945

________________

Milagros Rodriguez and Rodolfo Rodriguez,

Appellants,

vs.

Griselda Stanfield, et al.,

Appellees.

Appeals under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the 

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alan S. Fine, Judge.

Milagros Rodriguez, and Rodolfo Rodriguez, in proper persons.

Walter J. Harvey, School Board Attorney, and Jeff James, Assistant 

School Board Attorney; and Abigail Price-Williams, Miami-Dade County 

Attorney, and Benjamin D. Simon, Assistant County Attorney, for 

appellees.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alderwoods Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fifty-two
weeks ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

|Dated: March 13, 2006. |  | /s/ PAUL A. HOUSTONPaul A. Houston
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ KENNETH A. SLOANKenneth A. Sloan
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6149
CHARLES GOODE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Intake and Legal Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-891-2) Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 19, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Goode, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Charles Goode appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goode v. Angelone , No. CA-03-891-2 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 5, 2004; entered Jan. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7030

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARCUS JOHNSON, a/k/a Pep, a/k/a Little Marcus,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:01-cr-00304-MHL-RCY-10; 

3:16-cv-00161-MHL-RCY)

Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Robert E. Trono, Assistant 

United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marcus Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                  A.S.V., INC.
                 EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001, 2000 AND 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  2001              2000              1999
                                                                  ----              ----              ----
<S>                                                           <C>               <C>              <C>
BASIC
   Earnings
     Net earnings                                             $     755,668     $   1,450,909    $   1,412,053
                                                              =============     =============    =============

   Shares
     Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding                                        10,215,855         9,782,919        9,586,032
                                                              =============     =============    =============

   Earnings per common share                                  $         .07     $         .15    $         .15
                                                              =============     =============    =============

DILUTED
   Earnings
     Net earnings                                             $     755,668     $   1,450,909    $   1,412,053
                                                              =============     =============    =============

   Shares
     Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding                                        10,215,855         9,782,919        9,586,032
     Assuming exercise of options and warrants
       reduced by the number of shares which could
       have been purchased with the proceeds from
       the exercise of such options and warrants                    136,613           183,742          355,584
                                                              -------------     -------------    -------------

     Weighted average number of common and
       common equivalent shares outstanding                      10,352,468         9,966,661        9,941,616
                                                              =============     =============    =============

   Earnings per common share                                  $         .07     $         .15    $         .14
                                                              =============     =============    =============
</TABLE>




                                      X-2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-20-00393-CV

SEGUNDO NAVARRO DRILLING, LTD., Lewis Petro Properties, Inc.,

and BP America Production Company,

Appellants

v.

JUAN SALINAS RANCH MINERALS, LTD.,

Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CV7000614D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 31, 2021

DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal due to settlement. We grant the 

motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed 

against the party who incurred them.

PER CURIAM