alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 28 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 

for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school teachers to 

$500 and to extend it through 2011. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mrs. BIGGERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the deduction for certain expenses of elementary and 

secondary school teachers to $500 and to extend it 

through 2011. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Teacher Tax Reduction 

5 Act of 2009’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 28 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE AND EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR 

2 CERTAIN EXPENSES OF ELEMENTARY AND 

3 SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (D) of section 

5 62(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

6 to certain trade and business deductions of employees) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘$250’’ and inserting ‘‘$500’’, 

9 and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘during 2002’’ and all that fol11 lows through ‘‘2009’’ and inserting ‘‘after 2001 and 

12 before 2012’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

15 December 31, 2008. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated  financial  statements  of HomeSide,  Inc. as of and for the period
ended  November 30, 1996  appearing on Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such Form 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0001016628
<NAME>                                      HOMESIDE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Feb-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Mar-16-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Nov-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                               1,183
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      173,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21,650
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                              32,399
<DEPRECIATION>                                       3,178
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,858,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                            221,278
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               446
<OTHER-SE>                                         387,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,858,711
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   215,108
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   104,106
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  61,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     49,799
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20,523
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 29,276
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        29,276
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### MICHAEL TULLO *v.*GERALD E. KING

(AC 29774)

Gruendel, Harper and Robinson, Js.

Argued September 22

officially released October 20, 2009

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

DEFERRAL ELECTION FORM 

ANALOGIC CORPORATION AMENDED AND RESTATED 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK PLAN (THE “PLAN”) 
  

	I.	Plan Year and Return Information. This deferral election applies only to the Plan Year shown below. We must receive your completed form by the Return Date or your deferral election will not be effective.


  

			
	Plan Year	  	CY2015
	Return Date:	  	December 15, 2014
	Return To:	  	 Jackie Lucas at
Analogic
 e-mail: jlucas@analogic.com


  

	II.	Participant Name and Address 

  

			
	Name:	  	          
	Address:	  	          

  

	III.	Annual Cash Retainer Deferral Election. Please defer my Annual Cash Retainer ($30,000 for CY2015) as shown below. The deferral percentage must be between 0% and 100%, in multiples of 10
(e.g., 10%, 20%, 30%, etc.). The total of the deferral percentages must equal either 0% or 100%. 

  

			
	Percentage Deferred as Deferred Stock Units	  	0%
	Percentage Deferred into Cash Account	  	0%
	Total of above:	  	0%

  

	IV.	Annual Share Retainer Deferral Election. Please defer the indicated portion of my Annual Share retainer into Deferred Stock Units as shown below. The deferral percentage must be between 0% and 100%, in
multiples of 10 (e.g., 10%, 20%, 30%, etc.). 

  

			
	Percentage Deferred as Deferred Stock Units	  	0%

  

	V.	Distribution Election. Please distribute the then-current value of my Deferred Stock Units and/or cash account for the current Plan Year when indicated below. Mark only one/select date as applicable.


  

			
	 ̈	  	Upon termination of my service to Analogic as a member of the Board of Directors.
	 ̈  Date:           	  	On the date shown (must be at least one year from the date of your election).

  

	VI.	Participant Signature and Date. I acknowledge that my deferral election is subject to the Plan and the Plan Prospectus, copies of which have been provided to me. Deferral elections that are contrary to the Plan
or that are received after the Return Date will not be effective. Capitalized terms that are not defined in this form will have the definitions given to them in the Plan. 


 

			
	  

Signature:
  
	  	                  
      Date:

 2014 11 07 – For CY2015
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Payment Data Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Form
10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
August 14, 2009





By:
                      /s/
      Michael R. LongMichael
      R. LongChief
      Executive Officer,Chief
      Financial Officerand
      Principal Accounting Officer
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-111302) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1993 Equity Incentive
Plan, the Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, and the 2003 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of NitroMed, Inc. of our report dated February 19, 2004,
with respect to the financial statements of NitroMed, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.


                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 26, 2004
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence A. Denton, President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Lawrence A. Denton
------------------------------
Lawrence A. Denton
President,
Chief Executive Officer and
Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
November 13, 2003
[No. 66741-6-I.

Division One.

November 13, 2012.]

#### Gyles R. Long, *Appellant,*v. King County Metro Transit, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 09-2-20962-6, Andrea A. Darvas, J., entered January 25, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Becker, J.,

concurred in by Spearman, A.C.J., and Grosse, J.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Quinn Nelson, Appellant.

[860 NYS2d 546]

Appeal by the defen*535dant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.), rendered December 20, 2005, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (O’Dwyer, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v*Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19-21 [1995]; *People v Ayala,*15 AD3d 496 [2005]; *People v Montalbo,*254 AD2d 504, 505 [1998]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of both grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

At the suppression hearing, the People established probable cause for the arrest of the defendant *(see People v Torres,*47 AD3d 851 [2008], *lv denied*10 NY3d 817 [2008]). Thus, the evidence obtained as a result of the arrest was not the fruit of an unlawful arrest, and suppression on that ground was properly denied *(id.).*

Finally, the defendant’s contention that his due process rights were violated by the failure of the police to videotape his interrogation is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the contention is without merit *(see People v Rosas,*30 AD3d 545 [2006], *affd*8 NY3d 493 [2007]). Fisher, J.P, Ritter, Florio and Garni, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-11372

Conference Calendar

RONALD D. KELLY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

DAN JOSLIN, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CV-1402 

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Ronald D. Kelly, federal prisoner # 15592-064, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. 

Kelly pleaded guilty in the Western District of Oklahoma to

possession with the intent to manufacture a controlled substance. 

His § 2241 petition challenged the constitutionality of his

sentence in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220

(2005). 
No. 05-11372

-2-

On direct appeal, Kelly’s sentence was vacated under Booker,

and the matter was remanded for resentencing. United States v.

Kelly, 159 F. App’x 864, 867-68 (10th Cir. 2005). As Kelly has

received all of the relief he was seeking in his § 2241 petition,

his appeal is moot. See McRae v. Hogan, 576 F.2d 615, 616-17

(5th Cir. 1978). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED as moot.
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 21.1



               Subsidiary                        State of Incorporation

 Universal Outdoor, Inc.                         Illinois

 Universal Outdoor China, Inc.                   Delaware
 Universal Outdoor Management Corp.              Delaware

 Universal Outdoor (NY III) Adv. Acq.            Delaware
 Corp.

 Universal Outdoor (NY II) Advertising           Delaware
 Acquisition Corp.

 Universal Outdoor (NY) Advertising              Delaware
 Acquisition Corp.

 Revere Holding Corp.                            Delaware

 Southeast Vista Holding Co.                     Delaware

 Quantum Structures & Designs, Inc.              Illinois

 Visual Consultants, Inc.                        Tennessee

 Tanner Acquisition Corp.                        Delaware

 Penn Advertising of Baltimore, Inc.             Delaware

 Matthew Acquisition Corp.                       Delaware

 Transportation Media, Inc.                       Illinois

 Revere Acquisition Corp.                         Delaware

 HCA, Inc.                                        Illinois

 Visual Outdoor Advertising Inc.                  Tennessee

 Revere Billboard, Inc.                           Delaware

 Revere National Corp.                            Delaware

 Mall Media Acquisition Corp.                     Delaware

 Superior Outdoor Structures, Inc.                Illinois

 Revere National Corp. of Wilmington              Delaware

 Revere National Corp. of Philadelphia            Delaware

 Revere National Corp. of Pennsylvania            Delaware
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond M. Lagas, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 87]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the third degree. “[B]ecause defendant was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement, he waived his right to appeal from the sentence” *(People v Van Buren,*203 AD2d 961; *see, People v Wynn,*239 AD2d 921, *lv denied*90 NY2d 912; *cf., People v Monte,*242 AD2d 591). Defendant’s contention that the enhanced sentence is unduly harsh and severe does not survive the valid waiver of the right to appeal *(see, People v Allen,*82 NY2d 761; *People v West,*239 AD2d 921, *lv denied*90 NY2d 944). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Bristol, J.—Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND
FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEK PERIOD ENDED JUNE 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                          29,972
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  248,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (20,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    430,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,113,290
<PP&E>                                      11,705,538
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,200,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,063,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,986,554
<BONDS>                                         28,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,675
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,341,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,063,241
<SALES>                                      9,883,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,980,613
<CGS>                                        3,398,805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,159,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,105,725
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,359,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,359,438)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,359,438)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
NO. 03-14-00531-CR

DERRICK KUYKENDALL * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS Appellant * VS. * OF THE THIRD * SUPREME JUDICIAL * DISTRICT OF TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS * Appellee * AT AUSTIN TEXAS
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

APPELLATE BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS: COMES NOW, Appellant, and files this Motion for an Extension in which to file the Appellant’s Brief. In support of this motion, appellant shows the Court the following: I
. The Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Travis County, Texas of the offense of Manslaughter. After a probation revocation hearing, Appellant was assessed 15 years TDCJ. II. The deadline for filing the Appellant’s Brief is June 29, 2015 and Appellant has requested no previous extensions. III. ACCEPTED 03-14-00531-CR 5951173 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/6/2015 6:07:16 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKA t t o rn e y fo r th e A ppe l l an t w o u l d fu r th e r s h o w th e Co u r t th at h e h as b ee n

d i l i gen t in p r e p a ri ng A p p el l ee ’s b ri ef i n thi s c a se. D ue t o a veryb usy d oc k etc ounsel i s una b l e t o c omp l et e the b ri ef w i thi n the t i me f

rame. C ounsel re q uest s a n ext ensi on
o f tim e s o th a t h e m a y a d eq u a tel y p re p a re A p p el l a n t’s B rie f
. C o u n s el m u s t c o m p l ete h is in v e s ti g a ti o n o f

th e r e c o r d a n d d r a f

t t h e b r ie f
. W H E R E F O R E , A p p el l a ntp ray s the C ourtgrant thi s M ot i on a nd ext end the d e a d l in e f

o rf ilin g th e A p p e l l a n t’ s B r ie f to J u l y 2 7 , 2 0 1 5
. Re s pe ct fu l l yS u bm i t t e d, AR I E L PA YA N A t t o rn e yatL aw 1012 Ri o G r an de A u s t i n , Te x as 78701 ( 512) 478- 3900 (5 1 2 ) 4 7 2 -4 1 0 2 (f

a x) A ri elp a y a n@ hot ma i l
. c om / s/ A r iel P a y a n AR I E L PA YA N S t at e BarN o . 00794430
CERT I F I CATE OF S ERVI CE
B ymysignatur e ab ove, I her eb yc ert i f ytha ta true a nd c orr ect c op yof the ab ove a nd f ore goi ng M ot i on f

or E xt ensi on of T i me t o F i l e A p p el l a t e B ri ef ha s b ee n d el i ver ed to th e C r im in a l D is tr ic t A tt o rn e y o f s a id C o u n ty T e x a s , o n J u l y 6 , 2 0 1 5
.
Exhibit 32.01
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  I, Gary Herman, certify that:
  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Digital Creative Development Corporation for the quarter ending December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of op ations of the Company.
   Date: June 28, 2011
/s/ Gary HermanGary HermanPresident
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1439

___________

Daniel C. Buller, Private Citizen; *

Marie R. Buller, Private Citizen, *

*

Appellants, *

*

v. *

*

Kathleen A. Jaudzemis, Magistrate * Appeal from the United States

Judge; Eileen L. McBride, Attorney; * District Court for the

Terrance L. Michael, Attorney; Lyle * District of Nebraska.

E. Strom, Judge; Thomas J. *

Monaghan, Attorney; Thomas M. * [UNPUBLISHED]

Shanahan, Judge; Neal E. Galloway; *

Rose M. Haga; Wille Greason, Jr., U.S. *

Marshall; David L. Piester, Magistrate *

Judge; Roy Smith; William G. *

Cambridge, Judge; Pamela K. *

Bennett; Laurie M. Barrett, Attorney; *

Sally R. Johnson, Attorney; Mark *

Hoesing; James L. Engle; Thomas D. *

Thalken, Judge, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: June 5, 1998

 Filed: June 24, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________
The Honorable William G. Cambridge, Chief Judge, United States District

1

Court for the District of Nebraska. 

-2-

PER CURIAM.

Daniel and Marie Buller appeal the district court&s judgment assessing a $2,000 1

sanction against them pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. After a review

of the record and the parties& submissions on appeal, we believe that the district court

did not abuse its discretion in sanctioning the Bullers. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

This matter arises out of a previous district court case (see Buller v. Jaudzemis,

No. 8:CV-96-0047 (D. Neb. Mar. 4, 1997)), filed by the Bullers. Although Chief

Judge Cambridge is listed as a party in this action, it is not alleged that he participated

in any way in the previous litigation. When Chief Judge Cambridge assigned this case

to himself noting that he had "had absolutely nothing to do with the subject matter

therein," no party raised the issue of his recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 455 or otherwise.

The issue is also not raised on appeal. See United States v. Bauer, 19 F.3d 409, 414

(8th Cir. 1994) (noting that this court has held that claims under section 455 "'will not

be considered unless timely made'") (quoted case omitted). If it had been, any failure

to recuse was "harmless error" under the circumstances. See Parker v. Connors Steel

Co., 855 F.2d 1510, 1527 (11th Cir. 1988).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.