alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-195009) and the related Prospectus of Empresa Nacional de
Electricidad S.A. (Endesa-Chile) of our reports dated April 25, 2016 and January 27, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the
year ended December 31, 2015.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young Audit S.A.S.
|                              
|Ernst & Young Audit S.A.S.    
|                              
|Bogotá, Colombia              
|                              
|April 29, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 12, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 12, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17I0030. GERREN SMITH v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2016SR0323
[No. 66973-7-I.

Division One.

November 5, 2012.]

#### Pilchuck Contractors, Inc., *Respondent,*v. Michael T. Austin et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 10-2-13177-9, Gregory P. Canova, J., entered February 2, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Spearman, A.C.J.,

concurred in by Grosse and Becker, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 21


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

         The following is a list of the active subsidiaries of the Company as of
March 26, 1999, indicating the jurisdiction of incorporation of each and the
names under which such subsidiaries conduct business. In the case of each
subsidiary which is indented, its immediate parent owns beneficially all of the
voting securities, except New Valley Corporation, of which BGLS Inc. and New
Valley Holdings, Inc. collectively own approximately 42% of such voting
securities.

               NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
               ------------------                -----------------------------
         BGLS Inc.                                         Delaware
               Liggett Group Inc.                          Delaware
               Brooke (Overseas) Ltd.                      Delaware
               New Valley Holdings, Inc.                   Delaware
                    New Valley Corporation                 Delaware

         Not included above are other subsidiaries which, if considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary,
as such term is defined by Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NitroMed, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Michael D. Loberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|Dated: March 10, 2005 |  | /s/MICHAEL D. LOBERG, PH.D.Michael D. Loberg, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer and President
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 13.2

906 CERTIFICATION

The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or
Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Joaquín Galindo V., the Chief Executive Officer and Fernando Gardeweg R., the Chief Financial Officer of Empresa Nacional de
Electricidad S.A. (Endesa Chile), each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Endesa Chile.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 2, 2014



/s/ Joaquín Galindo V.Name: Joaquín Galindo V.Chief Executive Officer/s/ Fernando Gardeweg R.Name: Fernando Gardeweg R.Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Vincent C. Smith, certify that:

*          *1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Quest Software, Inc.;

*          *2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

*          *3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

*          *4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                    (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

                    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting  that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

*          *5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

                    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

                    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

| Date: August 14, 2003 | /s/ VINCENT C. SMITH        |   |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                  |                             |   |
|                  | **Vincent C. Smith,**       |   |
|                  | **Chief Executive Officer** |   |
#### In the Matter of Russell F., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[987 NYS2d 626]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Russell F. appeals from (1) a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Kings County (Olshansky, J.), dated April 24, 2013, made after a fact-finding hearing, finding that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of burglary in the second degree, petit larceny, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court dated *875July 19, 2013, which, upon the fact-finding order, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the appellant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the appeal from the fact-finding order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the fact-finding order was superseded by the order of disposition, and is brought up for review on the appeal from the order of disposition; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, the showup procedure by which the complainant identified him was reasonable under the circumstances, having been conducted in close spatial and temporal proximity to the incident *(see People v Duuvon,*77 NY2d 541, 544 [1991]; *Matter of Dashawn R.,*114 AD3d 686 [2014]; *People v Guitierres,*82 AD3d 1116, 1117 [2011]; *Matter of Kassan D.,*282 AD2d 747 [2001]). Furthermore, there was no evidence of undue suggestiveness *(see People v Guy,*47 AD3d 643, 644 [2008]; *Matter of Louis C.,*6 AD3d 430, 431 [2004]; *People v Yearwood,*197 AD2d 554 [1993]). Accordingly, the Family Court properly denied suppression of the identification testimony.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(see Matter of David H.,*69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]), the evidence was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the appellant’s identity and that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of burglary in the second degree, petit larceny, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree *(see People v Daddona,*81 NY2d 990 [1993]; *Matter of Uriah M.,*107 AD3d 997, 999 [2013]; *Matter of Trayvond W.,*71 AD3d 683 [2010]; *People v John,*51 AD3d 819, 819-820 [2008]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the Family Court’s determination was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 342.2 [2]; *cf. People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

Rivera, J.R, Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3064 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3064

                For the relief of Benita Veliz-Castillo.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2009

 Mr. Gonzalez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Benita Veliz-Castillo.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR BENITA VELIZ-CASTILLO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Benita Veliz-Castillo shall 
be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Benita Veliz-Castillo enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Benita Veliz-Castillo, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Benita Veliz-
Castillo shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To Board of Directors
Strouds, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 33-87608 and No. 33-87610) of our report dated April 14, 1999,
relating to the balance sheets of Strouds, Inc. as of February 27, 1999 and
February 28, 1998 and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
February 27, 1999, which report appears in the February 27, 1999 Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Strouds, Inc.




--------------------------
Los Angeles, California
September 7, 1999
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8Nos. 333-111302, 333-128338 and 333-134896 and Form S-3No. 333-127154) of NitroMed, Inc. and in the related Prospectusof our reports dated March 6, 2007, with respect to the financial statements ofNitroMed, Inc., NitroMed, Inc. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of NitroMed, Inc., includedin this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2006.
|  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|--|--------------------------------|--------|

 

Boston, MassachusettsMarch 6, 2007

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 24, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00011

- CV

Amanda WOOD and C.E.W., Jr.,

Appellants

v.

Kenneth VERNON , Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Katrina Fuller, Family Endeavors, Inc., Appellees

From the 37th J udicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI10235 Honorable Antonia Arteaga , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was originally due by February 1 5, 2021, but was not filed. On February 22 , 202 1, the district clerk filed a notification of late record, stating that the clerk’s record was not filed because appellant s had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant s w ere not entitled to appeal without paying the

fee.

We therefore ORDER that appellant s provide written proof to this court that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant s are entitled to appeal without paying th e clerk’s fee by March 5 , 2021 . If appellant s fail to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of February, 2021

.___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of Rose S. Mancini, Respondent, v Edmond R. Mancini, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 488]

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), dated August 26, 1996, as granted the mother’s motion for attorney’s fees in the sum of $2,852, and imposed sanctions in the sum of $10,000.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which imposed sanctions in the amount of $10,000 and substituting therefor a provision imposing sanctions in the amount of $5,000; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the mother.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in concluding that the husband’s conduct was frivolous within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130-1.2 and awarding the mother attorney’s fees and imposing sanctions *(see, Matter of Gordon v Marrone,*202 AD2d 104; *Carchi v Carchi,*203 AD2d 505). However, we find that a sanction in the amount of $5,000 is appropriate for the conduct at issue.

The father’s remaining contentions lack merit. Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and Lemer, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      32





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**








I,
      Gary
      Herman, certify that:





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Digital Creative Development Corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,2005 (the
      "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      February  8, 2006




/s/
      Gary
      Herman


Gary
      Herman


Chief
      Executive Officer









Exhibit
      32


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**








I,
      Skuli
      Thorvaldsson, certify that:





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Digital Creative Development Corporation.
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,2005 (the
      "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      February  8, 2006





/s/
      Skuli
      Thorvaldsson


Skuli
      Thorvaldsson


Chief
      Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Titus Real Estate, Inc., a Nevada corporation (wholly owned subsidiary)
Titus Real Estate, LLC, a California limited liability company (indirect wholly
owned subsidiary)
American Residential Funding, Inc., a Nevada corporation (wholly owned
subsidiary)
Bravo Real Estate, Inc., a California corporation (wholly owned subsidiary)
ExpiDoc.com, Inc., a California corporation (wholly owned subsidiary)
E-Net Mortgage Corporation, a Nevada corporation (wholly owned subsidiary)
LoanNet Mortgage, Inc., a Kentucky corporation (majority owned subsidiary)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,680
<SECURITIES>                                     8,445
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,419)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,936
<PP&E>                                          12,090
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,582)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,814
<BONDS>                                            691
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,457
<SALES>                                         11,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,916
<CGS>                                            4,686
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,348
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   129
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  50
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,296)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,296)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,296)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)


</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2967 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the alternative fuel 

and alternative fuel mixture credits for black liquor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2009 

Mrs. KIRKPATRICK of Arizona (for herself and Mr. FLAKE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the 

alternative fuel and alternative fuel mixture credits for 

black liquor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DENIAL OF ALTERNATIVE FUEL AND ALTER4 NATIVE FUEL MIXTURE CREDITS FOR BLACK 

5 LIQUOR. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The last sentence of paragraph 

7 (2) of section 6426(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

8 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘or biodiesel’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘biodiesel, or any fuel (including lignin, wood residues, or 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2967 IH

1 spent pulping liquors) derived from the production of 

2 paper or pulp’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall apply to fuel sold or used after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS