alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - 33 CFR Part 165
          - [Docket Number USCG-2017-0808]
          - RIN 1625-AA00

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS.

# ACTION:

Temporary final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Coast Guard is correcting a temporary final rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on October 3, 2017. The document issued a temporary safety zone for certain waters of the Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor and Inner Harbor in association with the movement of the historic sloop-of-war USS CONSTELLATION on October 26, 2017 (rain date of October 27, 2017).                    

# DATES:

This correction is effective from 8 a.m. on October 26, 2017, through 1 p.m. on October 27, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        If you have questions on this rule, call or email Mr. Ronald L. Houck, at Sector Maryland-National Capital Region, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 410-576-2674, email                         *Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In FR Doc. 2017-21180 appearing on page 45981 of Wednesday, October 3, 2017, the following corrections are made:

§ 165.T05-0808

1. On page 45984, in the 1st column, in § 165.T05-0808, correct paragraph (e) to read as follows: 

                        “(e)                         *Enforcement period.*                         This section will be enforced from 8 a.m. through 1 p.m. on October 26, 2017, and, if necessary due to inclement weather, from 8 a.m. through 1 p.m. on October 27, 2017.”                    

Dated: October 4, 2017.

Lonnie P. Harrison, Jr.

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region.

[FR Doc. 2017-21959 Filed 10-12-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
ACCEPTED 01-15-00964-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/15/2015 11:07:36 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      32,927,917
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      12,691,371
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            44,457,191
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                655,290,755
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      31,444,644
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        31,593,221
<LOANS>                                  1,315,053,005
<ALLOWANCE>                                  8,788,715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,309,445,844
<DEPOSITS>                               1,160,276,440
<SHORT-TERM>                               873,245,771
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         37,987,051
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 50,000,000
<COMMON>                                    42,018,745
<OTHER-SE>                                 145,917,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           2,309,445,844
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             54,573,465
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           15,643,003
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,605,425
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            71,821,893
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          24,158,672
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          46,059,844
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       25,762,049
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                2,400,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                         (1,327,593)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             30,396,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             28,721,519
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  22,960,322
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                22,960,322
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.52
<LOANS-NON>                                 47,301,374
<LOANS-PAST>                                   383,758
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,556,285
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             8,055,432
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                1,997,054
<RECOVERIES>                                   330,336
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            8,788,715
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         8,788,715
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Isidoro DeLeon, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 110416.)

[858 NYS2d 616]

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Philip J. Patti, J.), entered November 30, 2005. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of claimant’s motion seeking assignment of counsel and denied that part of the motion with respect to certain requests to compel disclosure.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Claimant, an inmate in a correctional facility, commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he allegedly sustained when he was assaulted by correction officers and denied appropriate medical treatment following the assault. The Court of Claims properly exercised its discretion insofar as it denied that part of claimant’s motion seeking assignment of counsel *(see generally Matter of Smiley,*36 NY2d 433, 439 [1975]), and denied that part of the motion with respect to certain requests to compel disclosure pursuant to CPLR 3124. “While disclosure provisions are to be liberally construed, the trial court is vested with broad discretion to supervise discovery and determine what is ‘material and necessary’ under CPLR 3101 (a)” *(Mora v RGB, Inc.,*17 AD3d 849, 851 [2005]). Here, there has been no showing of the requisite “ ‘clear abuse of discretion [to] prompt appellate action’ ” with respect to claimant’s disclosure requests *(Community Dev. Assn. v Warren-Hoffman & Assoc.,*4 AD3d 755 [2004]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P, Martoche, Smith, Green and Pine, JJ.
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries



|                               |  |                                       
|------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY             |  | STATE OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
|Intervest National Bank        |  | National Banking Association          
|                               | 
|Intervest Mortgage Corporation |  | New York                              
|                               | 
|Intervest Statutory Trust II   |  | Connecticut Business Trust            
|                               | 
|Intervest Statutory Trust III  |  | Connecticut Business Trust            
|                               | 
|Intervest Statutory Trust IV   |  | Delaware Business Trust               
|                               | 
|Intervest Statutory Trust V    |  | Delaware Business Trust
#### In the Matter of David Ontario C. St. Vincent’s Services, Inc., et al., Respondents; Gwendolyn C., Appellant.

[858 NYS2d 916]

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding *708and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Pearl, J.), dated May 1, 2007, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that she permanently neglected the subject child, terminated her parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject child to the Commissioner of Social Services and St. Vincent’s Services, Inc., for the purpose of adoption. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the motion is granted, Joan N.G. James is relieved as counsel for the appellant, and is directed to turn over all papers in her possession to new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

Ordered that Robert J. Marinelli, 26 Court Street, Suite 1815, Brooklyn, N.Y., 11242, is assigned as counsel to perfect the appeal from the order of fact-finding and disposition dated May 1, 2007; and it is further,

Ordered that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order and the petitioner shall serve and file its brief within 120 days of the date of this decision and order. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings) and on the briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

Upon this Court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that nonfrivolous issues exist, including, but not limited to, whether the appellant failed to plan for the child’s future for a period of more than one year following the date he came into the petitioner agency’s care *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]). Rivera, J.P, Spolzino, Dickerson and Eng, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                       CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
            As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
                                   Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter
ended December 31, 2005 of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Dina L. Masi, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Integrated BioPharma, Inc. certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
         78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Date:   February 14, 2006        By: /s/ Dina L. Masi
                                 --------------------
                                 Dina L. Masi,
                                 Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Total Identity Corp. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Matthew P. Dwyer, CEO and CFO of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








September
                21, 2006
            
            
            By:/s/ Matthew P. DwyerMatthew
                P. Dwyer, CEO, CFO, President, principal executive officer and principal
                financial and accounting officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,096                       0
<SECURITIES>                                     7,806                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,562                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (209)                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,904                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,740                       0
<PP&E>                                          11,154                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,709)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,502                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,086                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            10                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,406                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,502                       0
<SALES>                                          4,559                   3,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,051                   3,820
<CGS>                                            1,824                   1,565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,684                   7,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    43                      12
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 131                      32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,551)                 (3,617)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,551)                 (3,617)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,551)                 (3,617)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.79)                  (3.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.79)                  (3.42)
        

</TABLE>
#### Anselmo Pascual Puentes SOLIS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70350.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 14, 2011.

Scott Allen Marks, Law Offices of Scott A. Marks, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Susan Houser, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Anselmo Pascual Puentes Solis, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings, *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 & n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992), and we review de novo due process claims, *Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that internal relocation for Puentes Solis is unreasonable. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(l)(i)(B) (presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution is rebutted if the applicant could reasonably be expected to relocate to another part of the country to avoid future persecution).

Puentes Solis failed to exhaust his contention that the IJ violated due process by not acting as a neutral decision maker. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review this claim. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004); *Sanchez-Cruz v. INS,*255 F.3d 775, 780 (9th Cir.2001).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40903 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ANGEL RENTERIA-GALAVIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-104-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 12, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Angel Renteria-Galaviz appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Renteria-Galaviz argues that he was charged with and pleaded guilty to simple reentry under § 1326(a) and that he could not be sentenced under § 1326(b) because the indictment did not allege that he had a prior aggravated felony conviction. His argument is foreclosed by this court’s decision in United States v. Vasquez-Olvera , 999 F.2d 943, 946-47 (5th Cir. 1993).No. -2- AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3053 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3053

       To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 
   Reconciliation Act of 1996 to repeal the denial to drug felons of 
eligibility for benefits under the program of temporary assistance for 
                            needy families.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2009

Mr. Carson of Indiana (for himself, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Davis of 
    Illinois, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Hastings of Florida, and Ms. Norton) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 
   Reconciliation Act of 1996 to repeal the denial to drug felons of 
eligibility for benefits under the program of temporary assistance for 
                            needy families.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF DENIAL TO DRUG FELONS OF ELIGIBILITY FOR BENEFITS 
              UNDER THE PROGRAM OF TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY 
              FAMILIES.

    Section 115 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 
Reconciliation Act of 1996 (21 U.S.C. 862a) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``for--'' and all that 
        follows through ``(2)'' and inserting ``for'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking paragraph (1) and all 
        that follows through ``--'' in paragraph (2); and
            (3) in subsection (e), by striking ``it--'' and all that 
        follows through ``(2)'' and inserting ``it''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Paul Furnari et al., Appellants, v George Rutigliano et al., Respondents.

[667 NYS2d 52]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to *542foreclose a mechanic’s lien, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), entered July 11, 1996, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the individual defendants George Rutigliano and Francis Rutigliano.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action as against the individual defendants and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the defendants’ motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court improperly granted summary judgment to the individual defendants dismissing the first cause of action in the complaint inasmuch as the plaintiffs have raised triable issues of fact as to whether the labor and materials they provided for the improvement of the individual defendants’ home were supplied with the consent or at the request of the individual defendants (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). If the individual defendants requested or consented to the provision of the labor and materials in question the plaintiffs could properly file a mechanic’s lien for the amount due or payable (see, Lien Law § 3). Altman, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.