alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

              CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     The following list includes all of the Registrant's wholly-owned
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002. All subsidiaries of the Registrant
appearing in the following table are included in the consolidated financial
statements of the Registrant.

<Table>
<Caption>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                      JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
------------------                      -----------------------------
<S>                                  <C>
Belize Water Limited...............  Belize
Cayman Water Company Limited(1)....  Cayman Islands
Hurricane Hide-A-Way Ltd.(1).......  Cayman Islands
</Table>

---------------

(1) Dormant companies, with no operations, assets and liabilities.
#### Edward C. Bedell et al., Appellants, v Mary A. Hornick et al., Defendants, and Nice N Easy Grocery Shoppes, Inc., Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 498]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), entered June 10, 1996, as, after a jury trial, was in favor of the defendant Nice N Easy Grocery Shoppes, Inc., and against them.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well established that jurors may not impeach their own verdict *(Alford v Sventek,*53 NY2d 743; *Snediker v County of Orange,*89 AD2d 560, *affd*58 NY2d 647). This principle, however, is subject to two well-known exceptions. First, where an error is made in reporting the verdict, the Trial Judge may, upon the unanimous affidavits or statements of the jurors, correct the judgment to conform to the actual verdict *(see, Rose v Thau,*45 AD2d 182, 185). Second, where the record demonstrates substantial confusion among the jurors in reaching a verdict, the court must direct a new trial to prevent a miscarriage of justice to the litigants *(see, Pache v Boehm,*60 AD2d 867, 868).

In the present case, the jury returned a verdict finding that the defendant Nice N Easy Grocery Shoppes, Inc. (hereinafter Nice N Easy), acting through its employees, was negligent, but that Nice N Easy’s negligence was not a substantial factor in causing the accident at issue. There is no evidence that the verdict was reported incorrectly or that there was substantial confusion among the jurors in reaching that verdict. Accordingly, there is no reason to order a new trial on the issue of Nice N Easy’s negligence. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To
the Board of Directors
Alderwoods Group, Inc.

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No. 333-124602, No. 333-124604, No. 333-85466 and
No. 333-85474 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-85316 on Form S-3, of Alderwoods
Group, Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Alderwoods Group, Inc. as at December 31, 2005 and January 1,
2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended December 31, 2005, the fifty-two weeks
ended January 1, 2005 and the fifty-three weeks ended January 3, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2005, annual report
on Form 10-K of Alderwoods Group, Inc.

KPMG LLP (signed)Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, Canada
March 10, 2006

---



QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Humphreys and Senior Judge Overton 

WESTMINSTER AT LAKE RIDGE AND 

 MANUFACTURERS ALLIANCE 

 INSURANCE CO. 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1320-05-4 PER CURIAM 

 OCTOBER 4, 2005 

ROMONA BOCANEGRA 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Angela C. Fleming; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., on brief), for 

appellants. 

 No brief for appellee. 

 Westminster at Lake Ridge and its insurer appeal a decision of the Workers’ 

Compensation Commission finding that Romona Bocanegra proved she sustained a cervical 

spine injury causally related to her compensable January 23, 2004 injury by accident. We have 

reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion, and we hold that this appeal is without merit. 

Accordingly, we affirm the commission’s decision for the reasons stated by the commission in 

its final opinion. See Bocanegra v. Westminster at Lake Ridge, VWC File No. 218-93-55 (May 

3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not 

aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
#### Tarik Frelow, Appellant, v Danny D. Leung et al., Respondents.

[987 NYS2d 205]

*746In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bayne, J.), dated May 24, 2013, as granted those branches of the motion of the defendants Danny D. Leung and Carrie S. Jones, and the separate motion of the defendant Mahmoud T. Sadr, which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs to the plaintiff payable by the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs, and those branches of the motions which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the movants are denied.

The defendants, moving separately but relying on the same evidence and arguments, met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injuries to the cervical and lumbar regions of the plaintiffs spine did not constitute serious injuries under either the permanent consequential limitation of use or significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Staff v Yshua,*59 AD3d 614 [2009]), and that the alleged injury to the cervical region of the plaintiff’s spine was not caused by the accident in any event *(see generally Jilani v Palmer,*83 AD3d 786, 787 [2011]).

In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact as to whether he sustained serious injuries to the cervical and lumbar regions of his spine, and whether the alleged injury to the cervical region of his spine was caused by the accident *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 218-219 [2011]). Therefore, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Rivera, J.E, Dickerson, Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND ON PAGES 1 AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         104,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  351,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,821,520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,502,392
<PP&E>                                       6,143,929
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,811,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,575,766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,785,351
<BONDS>                                      7,082,449
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,336
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,683,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,575,766
<SALES>                                     14,346,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,346,579
<CGS>                                        5,906,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,816,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (22,968)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             390,441
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,837,697)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,943
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,853,640)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,221,763
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (631,877)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2742 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2742

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
          relations treatment) to the products of Azerbaijan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2009

Mr. Wexler (for himself and Mr. Shuster) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
          relations treatment) to the products of Azerbaijan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF THE TRADE ACT OF 
              1974 TO THE PRODUCTS OF AZERBAIJAN.

    (a) Presidential Determinations and Extension of Nondiscriminatory 
Treatment.--Notwithstanding any provision of title IV of the Trade Act 
of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may--
            (1) determine that the denial of nondiscriminatory 
        treatment should no longer apply to the products of Azerbaijan; 
        and
            (2) after making a determination under paragraph (1) with 
        respect to Azerbaijan, proclaim the extension of 
        nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) 
        to the products of Azerbaijan.
    (b) Termination of Applicability of Title IV.--On and after the 
date on which the President extends nondiscriminatory treatment to the 
products of Azerbaijan pursuant to subsection (a), title IV of the 
Trade Act of 1974 shall cease to apply to Azerbaijan.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                 Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                  51
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                           67
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                             96
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       284
<PP&E>                                1613
<DEPRECIATION>                          65
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        3472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 3979
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                               147
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                             46
<OTHER-SE>                            (741)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          3472
<SALES>                                362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       362
<CGS>                                  369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (495)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (495)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                          (495)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.61)
                            

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Nicholas J. Benson, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunterra Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control of financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



a. all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control of financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and



b. any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ NICHOLAS J. BENSON 
|Nicholas J. Benson     
|Chief Executive Officer
|Dated: August 9, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

          - 41 CFR Appendix C to Chapter 301 and Parts 304-2, 304-3, and 304-6
          - [FTR Case 2016-301; Docket No. 2016-0008, Sequence 1]
          - RIN 3090-AJ69

# AGENCY:

Office of Government-wide Policy, U.S. General Services Administration (GSA).

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

The General Services Administration (GSA) is withdrawing FTR Case 2016-301; Clarification of Payment in Kind for Speakers at Meetings and Similar Functions. This proposed rule is being withdrawn so that GSA can develop a comprehensive revision to the Federal Travel Regulation.

# DATES:

The proposed rule published on August 15, 2016 (81 FR 53979) is withdrawn as of October 13, 2017.

# ADDRESSES:

Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405, 202-501-4755.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For clarification of content, contact Ms. Jill Denning, Program Analyst, Office of Government-wide Policy, at 202-208-7642. Contact the Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405, 202-501-4755, for information pertaining to status or publication schedules. Please cite FTR case 2016-301.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

# List of Subjects in 41 CFR Appendix C to Chapter 301 and Parts 304-2, 304-3, and 304-6

      - Government employees
      - Travel and transportation expenses

Authority:5 U.S.C. 5707, and 5 U.S.C. 5707; 31 U.S.C. 1353.

Dated: October 5, 2017.

Allison Fahrenkopf Brigati,

Associate Administrator, Office of Government-wide Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-22016 Filed 10-12-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6820-14-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         177,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    189,651
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               579,423
<PP&E>                                      14,674,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,648,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,706,397
<BONDS>                                     10,426,289
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,751
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,515,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,648,661
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,376,947
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,729,167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               174,719
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             821,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,348,175
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,348,175
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,348,175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.63)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Jeffery A. Mason, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Featherlite, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Jeffery A. Mason   
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



53