alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   |                                         | Jurisdiction      of |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|   | Name                                    | Incorporation        |
|   | Cecil      Bank                              | Maryland             |
|   | Cecil      Bancorp Capital Trust I           | Delaware             |
|   | Cecil      Bancorp Capital Trust II          | Delaware             |
|   | Cecil      Properties, Inc.                  | Maryland             |
|   | 1223      Turkey Point Road, LLC (99%)       | Maryland             |
|   |                                         |                 |
|   | Subsidiaries      of Cecil Bank:             |                 |
|   | Cecil Financial Services      Corporation    | Maryland             |
|   | Cecil Service      Corporation               | Maryland             |
|   | Cecil Ventures,    LLC                       | Maryland             |
|   | 3106 Emmorton Road, LLC      (99%)           | Maryland             |
|   |                                         |                 |
|   | Subsidiaries      of Cecil Properties, Inc.: |                 |
|   | 3106 Emmorton Road, LLC      (1%)            | Maryland             |
|   | 1223 Turkey Point Road, LLC      (1%)        | Maryland             |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              4,440
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              7,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    3,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        15,890
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             43,558
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               43,673
<LOANS>                                            73,149
<ALLOWANCE>                                           959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    149,846
<DEPOSITS>                                        125,666
<SHORT-TERM>                                            0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 1,558
<LONG-TERM>                                         1,706
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              145
<OTHER-SE>                                         20,771
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                    149,846
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     1,519
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                     871
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                      226
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    2,616
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  1,303
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     31
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               1,282
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                          80
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                      0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                       909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       417
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                            417
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                          270
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       7.22
<LOANS-NON>                                           631
<LOANS-PAST>                                            0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                        0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                      879
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                           0
<RECOVERIES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                     959
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                  449
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                               510
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,974
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,783
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,149
<PP&E>                                          26,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,098
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,086
<BONDS>                                         16,084
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,343
<SALES>                                         24,122
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,122
<CGS>                                           21,154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   641
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    529
<INCOME-TAX>                                       220
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                309
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       309
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
#### DAVID PALMER *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 29887)

Bishop, DiPentima and Peters, Js.

Argued October 19

officially released November 3, 2009

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00618-CR

John Anders, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. A-99-0301-S, THE HONORABLE MARTIN (BROCK) JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

After three motions for an extension of time to file appellant’s brief were granted by

this Court, appellant’s brief was due March 5, 2015. The brief has not been received and appellant’s

court-appointed attorney, John E. Sutton, did not respond to this Court’s notice that the brief

is overdue.

The appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct a

hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether counsel

has abandoned this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The court shall make appropriate

written findings and recommendations. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). If necessary, the court

shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in these appeals. Following

the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order the appropriate supplemental
clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings and orders—to be prepared and forwarded to

this Court no later than April 29, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3).

It is so ordered on this the 30th day of March, 2015.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Abated and Remanded

Filed: March 30, 2015

Do Not Publish

2
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the Company) on Form
10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Frederick W. McTaggart, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: June 27, 2003





| |                               
| | ------------------------------
| | By: /s/ Frederick W. McTaggart
| |                               
| | Name: Frederick W. McTaggart  
| | Title: Chief Financial Officer
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 13 - 00263 - CV BYRON MORGAN, APPELL ANT V. D&S MOBILE HOME CENT ER, INC. AND SHAWN FULLER, AP PELLEE S On Appeal from the 99th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012 - 503,563, Honorable William C. Sowder, Presiding



### October 3 , 2013 ORDER Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Appellant Byron Morgan filed a notice of appeal on August 7, 2013, but failed to pay the $175 filing fee required under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5. We informed Morgan, by letter dated August 8, 2013, that the filing fee was outstanding and that th e appeal would be dismissed unless it was paid within ten days from the August 8th letter. T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(c); see Holt v. F.F. Enterprises , 990 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App. – Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d). The fee was not paid, and the record failed to show2

Morg an to be indigent or having requested leave to proceed as an indigent. Therefore, the cause was dismissed via opinion issued on September 6, 2013. On September 9, 2013, Morgan filed a motion to “reinstate” the appeal along with the filing fee. 1 However, on September 13, 2013, Shawn Fuller, one of the defendants in the cause, filed a response opposing the motion. He based his opposition on the ground that a final judgment had yet to be filed; that is, he believed that the judgment disposed of the claims a sserted against only one defendant, D&S Mobile Home Center, Inc. Nothing in the judgment pertained to Fuller. On September 19 th , this court advised appellant that action would be withheld on his motion to reinstate and also directed him to address whethe r a final, appealable judgment had been filed disposing of all claims and parties. In his response, Morgan produced another judgment that reveals (when coupled with the judgment pertaining to D&S Mobile Home Center) that all claims against all parties wer e disposed of by the trial court. Therefore, we grant Morgan’s motion to reinstate and vacate our prior order dismissing the appeal. Per Curiam

1 We treat the motion as one for rehearing.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44128

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

GROVER EARL MCALISTER JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 824

Filed: December 27, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Kootenai County. Hon. Cynthia K. C. Meyer, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of two years, for felony eluding a peace officer, affirmed. 

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Grover Earl McAlister Jr. pled guilty to felony eluding a peace officer. I.C. § 49-

1404(2). In exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed. The district court 

sentenced McAlister to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of 
2

two years. McAlister filed an I.C.R. 35 motion, which the district court denied. McAlister

appeals.1

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, McAlister’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

 

1 McAlister also pled guilty to misdemeanor leaving the scene of an accident and was 

sentenced to a concurrent six-month term. However, he does not challenge this sentence on 

appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      18,150,236
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,469,553
<ALLOWANCES>                                    94,830
<INVENTORY>                                     70,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,810,369
<PP&E>                                      70,851,394
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,119,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             128,485,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,784,870
<BONDS>                                    130,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,733,021)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               128,485,285
<SALES>                                     31,382,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,382,102
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,332,063
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               783,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,634,819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (367,923)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (367,923)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (367,923)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47483-47484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22181]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE:  Wednesday, October 18, 2017, 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

PLACE:  Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, MD.

STATUS:  Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.
    Matter To Be Considered: Decisional Matter: (1) Prohibition of 
Children's Toys and Child Care Articles Containing Specified 
Phthalates--Final Rule; (2) Revision to the Notice of Requirements 
(NOR) for Prohibition of Children's Toys and Child Care Articles 
Containing

[[Page 47484]]

Specified Phthalates--Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at https://www.cpsc.gov/live.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Rockelle Hammond, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: October 10, 2017.
Alberta E. Mills,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-22181 Filed 10-10-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
File Name: 14a0126n.06

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

No. 13-3235

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

BEATRIZ HERRERA; )

VICTORIA ISABEL PEREZ, )

)

Petitioners, )

) ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A

) DECISION OF THE BOARD OF

v. ) IMMIGRATION APPEALS

)

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., )

Attorney General, ) O P I N I O N

)

Respondent. )

)

BEFORE: BOGGS, NORRIS, and WHITE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Petitioner Beatriz Herrera seeks asylum or, in the alternative,

withholding of removal on behalf of herself and her daughter, Victoria Isabel Perez. Petitioner

was born in Colombia and is also a citizen of Spain where she resided before coming to the

United States with her daughter. The crux of her claim is that she suffered domestic abuse at the

hands of her husband while the family lived in Spain and that the government was unable or

unwilling to protect her. Both the immigration judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“the Board”) denied relief. 

As with virtually all applicants for asylum, one may sympathize with petitioner’s desire

to continue her residence in the United States. Based upon the administrative record, it appears 

that petitioner has suffered domestic abuse. However, as the Board recognized, that sad fact
Herrera v. Holder

No. 13-3235

does not end our inquiry. Even if we were to assume, as did the Board, that domestic violence

“may in some cases be a basis for asylum,” (A.R. 4) petitioner has not established that the

Spanish government could or would not protect her. Absent this vital element, her application

for asylum or, in the alternative, withholding of removal, fails. In reaching this conclusion, we

acknowledge the exemplary advocacy petitioner received below and in her appeal to this court. 

Nevertheless, after our own independent review of the administrative record, we adopt the

reasoning set forth in the Board’s decision dated January 29, 2013.

Accordingly, the petition for review is denied.

- 2 -
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2972 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 115 West Edward Street in Erath, Louisiana, 

as the ‘‘Conrad DeRouen, Jr. Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2972 EH

1 SECTION 1. CONRAD DEROUEN, JR. POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 115 West Edward Street in 

4 Erath, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Conrad DeRouen, Jr. Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Conrad DeRouen, Jr. 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2972 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Erath, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Conrad DeRouen, Jr. al Service located at 115 West Edward Street in
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunterra Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/    NICHOLAS J. BENSON
|                         



Dated: November 14, 2003
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3123 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Reclamation, to remedy problems caused by a collapsed drainage tunnel 

in Leadville, Colorado, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2009 

Mr. LAMBORN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 

Bureau of Reclamation, to remedy problems caused by 

a collapsed drainage tunnel in Leadville, Colorado, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LEADVILLE MINE DRAINAGE TUNNEL REMEDI4 ATION. 

5 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

6 ‘‘Leadville Mine Drainage Tunnel Remediation Act of 

7 2009’’. 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3123 IH

1 (b) TUNNEL REMEDIATION.—The Reclamation 

2 Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (Pub3 lic Law 102–575) is amended as follows: 

4 (1) By striking section 705. 

5 (2) In section 708(a)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘(a)’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘(a)(1)’’; 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘The Secretary shall have’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘Except as provided by paragraph 

10 (2), the Secretary shall have’’; and 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(2) The Secretary shall participate in the implemen13 tation of the operable unit 6 remedy for the California 

14 Gulch Superfund Site, as such remedy is defined in the 

15 Environmental Protection Agency’s 2003 Record of Deci16 sion for such operable unit, by— 

17 ‘‘(A) treating water behind any blockage or 

18 bulkhead in the Leadville Mine Drainage Tunnel, in19 cluding surface water diverted into the Tunnel 

20 workings as part of the remedy; and 

21 ‘‘(B) managing and maintaining the mine pool 

22 behind such blockage or bulkhead at a level that pre23 cludes surface runoff and releases and minimizes the 

24 potential for tunnel failure due to excessive water 

25 pressure in the tunnel.’’. 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3123 IH

1 (3) In section 708(f), by striking ‘‘and 708’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘, 708, and 709’’. 

3 (4) By adding at the end of title VII the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 709. TUNNEL MAINTENANCE. 

6 ‘‘The Secretary shall take such steps to repair or 

7 maintain the structural integrity of the Leadville Mine 

8 Drainage Tunnel (LMDT) as may be necessary in order 

9 to prevent tunnel failure and to preclude uncontrolled re10 lease of water from any portion of the tunnel.’’. 

11 (5) In the table of sections contained in section 

12 2— 

13 (A) by striking the item relating to section 

14 705; and 

15 (B) by inserting after the item relating to 

16 section 708 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 709. Tunnel maintenance.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS