alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Metallica Resources Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.

Date:  May 18, 2004

/s/ Bradley J. Blacketor
-------------------------
Bradley J. Blacketor
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, John L. Finlayson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2004 of Susquehanna Media Co.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
c. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; d. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and e. Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 17, 2004      /s/ John L. Finlayson       John L. Finlayson   Vice President and CFO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEEON ANTONIO FRASIER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 215 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of August, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George C. Carp, state and attest that:



|1. | I am the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Main Place Funding, LLC (the Registrant).
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) containing financial statements fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods presented.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ George C. Carp                        
|George C. Carp                            
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|March 30, 2007
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Gary Allanson, Chief Executive Officer of International
Dispensing Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
          ended September 30, 2002, which this certification accompanies, fully
          complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.

November 14,  2002                      /s/ Gary Allanson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Gary Allanson
                                        Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11019 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS PASCUAL ALONSO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-92-ALL

-------------------- Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos Pascual Alonso raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000928032
<NAME> AIM GROUP, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,898
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  368,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    202,155
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               587,852
<PP&E>                                         799,396
<DEPRECIATION>                                 236,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,201,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,035,149
<BONDS>                                      1,143,091
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,801
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,983,406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,201,447
<SALES>                                      2,316,472
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,316,472
<CGS>                                        1,795,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,795,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               813,583
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             189,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (482,763)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (482,763)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (482,763)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00 409 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS , RICHARD FREYMANN, VICTORIA LEIJA, AND JAMES D. LAWSON

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion 1 

### Per Curiam Relators, State Farm Lloyds , Richard Freymann, Victoria Leija, and James D. Lawson, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct respondent, the Honorable Rose Guerra Reyna, Presiding Judge of the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, to withdraw her order denying relators’ verified plea in abatement and to enter an order abating the suit for damages brought agai nst relator s by the real part ies in i nterest, Alejandro Arzola and Noemi Arzola, u ntil sixty days after they

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. ” ); T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2

provide relators with a notice letter for their claim stating the specific, separate amounts for the claimed damages and attorney’s fees. See T EX

. I NS

. C ODE A NN . § 541.154 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Prior Notice of Action”); id. § 541.155 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Abatement”); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.1 (“Commencement” of Original Proceedings). By order previously issued in this cause, this Court granted temporary relief and requested that the real part ies in interest file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a),(b). Suc h response has been duly filed.
T he Court, having examined and fully considered th e petition for writ of mandamus, the response, and the applicable law, is of the opinion that th e petition for writ of mandamus should be denied for the reasons expressed in our opinion in In re State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freymann, and Nathan Burris , No. 13

- 14

- 00347

- CV, 2014 WL _____ (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi Aug. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.), available at http://www.search.txcourts.gov/case.aspx?cn=13

- 14

- 00348

- CV. Accordingly, the Court LIFTS the stay previously imposed by this Court and DENIES the petit ion for writ of mandamus

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.8( d ).

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 2nd day of September, 2014.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,516,709
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,422,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                   290,000
<INVENTORY>                                    907,207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,738,571
<PP&E>                                       3,901,562
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,516,066
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,308,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,915,756
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        55,092
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,337,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,308,095
<SALES>                                     32,451,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,825,535
<CGS>                                       26,608,898
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               53,612,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (978,252)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             564,859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                191,190
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            191,190
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   191,190
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


        EXHIBIT 99.2 - STATEMENTS REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of TMI Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended September 29, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay M.
Haft, Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer) of the
Company, certify that

-        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

-        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
         Company.


/s/ Jay M. Haft
--------------------------------
Jay M. Haft

November 15, 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of TMI Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended September 29, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc
Douglas, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify
that

-        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

-        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
         Company.


/s/ Marc Douglas
--------------------------------
Marc Douglas

November 15, 2002

The foregoing certifications are made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21692]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace.

DATE/TIME: Friday, October 20, 2017 (10:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m.).

LOCATION: 2301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20037.

STATUS: Open Session--Portions may be closed pursuant to Subsection (c) 
of Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in 
subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, 
Public Law 98-525.

AGENDA: October 20, 2017 Board Meeting: Chairman's Report; Vice 
Chairman's Report; President's Report; Approval of Minutes of the One 
Hundred and Sixty Second Meeting (April 21, 2017) and the One Hundred 
and Sixty Third Meeting (July 21, 2017) of the Board of Directors; 
Reports from USIP Board Committees; Ukraine/Russia Working Group 
Report; and Israel/Palestine Program Report.

CONTACT: William B. Taylor, Executive Vice President: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#addad9ccd4c1c2dfedd8dec4dd83c2dfca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8dfaf9ecf4e1e2ffcdf8fee4fda3e2ffea">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 3, 2017.
William B. Taylor,
Executive Vice President.
[FR Doc. 2017-21692 Filed 10-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6820-AR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

32.1              Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                  Financial Officer of VOXEL pursuant to Section 906 of
                  the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of VOXEL (the "Company") for
the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael Anthony,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of VOXEL, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 17, 2008

                                      /s/Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00346-CR

David Lee Raetzsch, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-08-201943, HONORABLE JIM CORONADO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant David Lee Raetzsch has filed a pro se Motion to Withdraw Notice of

Appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: June 19, 2008

Do Not Publish
#### Zvonko STEPANOVIC, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Respondent.

No. 07-3883.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Dec. 21, 2007.*

Larry J. Hagen, Oak Park, IL, for Petitioner.

Manning Evans, Department of Justice Civil Division, Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*654Before FLAUM, RIPPLE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This opinion was released initially in typescript form.

ON MOTION FOR STAY OF RUNNING OF VOLUNTARY DEPARTURE PERIOD AND RESPONDENT’S OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR STAY OF RUNNING OF VOLUNTARY DEPARTURE PERIOD

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the court on the petitioner’s motion for stay of running of voluntary departure period, filed by counsel for the petitioner on November 30, 2007 and on the respondent’s opposition to petitioner’s motion for stay of running of voluntary departure period, filed by counsel for the respondent on December 13, 2007.

Voluntary departure is an alternative to removal, which allows an alien to leave the United States at his or her own expense within a certain period of time. 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(a), (b). Once voluntary departure has been granted by the immigration service, this court may toll the voluntary departure period pending appeal. *Lopez-Chavez v. Ashcroft,*383 F.3d 650, 654 (7th Cir.2004). A petitioner seeking a stay of voluntary departure must demonstrate that he is likely to succeed on the merits. *Lopez-Chavez,*383 F.3d at 654-55; *Sofinet v. INS,*188 F.3d 703, 706 (7th Cir.1999).

Mr. Stepanovie makes no attempt to describe his arguments on appeal, let alone demonstrate that he would succeed on the merits. Zvonko Stepanovie’s three-paragraph motion does nothing more than make a general request for a stay. The motion and attached affidavit from counsel even fail to state what type of relief Mr. Stepanovic sought before the immigration courts, noting only that his “relief application” was denied. This court has repeatedly noted that a motion to stay removal that does not set forth information needed for this court to properly adjudicate the matter will be denied. *See Zheng v. Mukasey,*507 F.3d 1074 (7th Cir.2007); *Koutcher v. Gonzales,*494 F.3d 1133, 1134 (7th Cir.2007). A bare-bones motions seeking a stay of voluntary departure is equally unhelpful. Without more information, this court cannot assess the likelihood that Mr. Stepanovie could succeed in demonstrating that the BIA erred by dismissing his appeal.

Accordingly, it is ordered that this motion is denied.

Motion Denied
Exhibit 10.1


 




SENIOR SECURED CREDIT FACILITY AGREEMENT

IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF US$6,000,000

BY AND AMONG

PACIFIC VENTURES GROUP, INC. and ROYALTY FOODS PARTNERS, LLC,

collectively, as Borrower,

SNOBAR HOLDINGS, INC., SNOBAR TRUST, INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTION IMPEX CORP. and MAS GLOBAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.,

as Joint and Several Guarantors,


And


TCA GLOBAL CREDIT MASTER FUND, LP,


as Lender