alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,535
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         764,221
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 725,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        191,183
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    115,750
<COMMON>                                           345
<OTHER-SE>                                     338,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   725,114
<SALES>                                        103,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,767
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,113
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,760)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,164
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2913 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2913

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 3, 2009

                                Received

                             August 7, 2009

  Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                                 Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the United States courthouse located at 301 Simonton 
Street in Key West, Florida, as the ``Sidney M. Aronovitz United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 301 Simonton Street in Key 
West, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``Sidney M. 
Aronovitz United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sidney M. 
Aronovitz United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000593 31-OCT-2018 12:17 PM
#### Philip W. Megna et al., Appellants, v Newsday, Inc., Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 718]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated October 16, 1996, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant merely sponsored the race in which the injured plaintiff participated. The defendant was not in any way involved in the design, layout, maintenance, or control of the race course, and was not in a position to assume such control. Accordingly, the defendant owed no duty of care to the plaintiffs *(see, Mongello v Davos Ski Resort,*224 AD2d 502; *Johnson v Cherry Grove Is. Mgt.,*175 AD2d 827; *McGrath v United Hosp.,*167 AD2d 518; *Vogel v West Mtn. Corp.,*97 AD2d 46).

We reject the plaintiffs’ contention that summary judgment is premature because more discovery is needed *(see, Abbenanate v Tyree Co.,*228 AD2d 529, 530). Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman, Krausman and Lerner, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence A. Denton, President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ Lawrence A. Denton
----------------------
Lawrence A. Denton
President,
Chief Executive Officer and
Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
May 7, 2003
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Allied Security Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”) for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Daniel Sobolewski, Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|By: | /s/ Daniel Sobolewski                                 | 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Daniel Sobolewski                                     | 
|    | Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | (Principal Executive Officer)                         | 
|    | January 10, 2019                                      | 





A signed original of this certification
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
[No. 29928-7-III.

Division Three.

October 18, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kyle J. Stoddard, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kittitas County, No. 11-1-00023-0, Scott R. Sparks, J., entered May *23,2011.Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per

Korsmo, C.J.,

concurred in by Brown and Kulik, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code  I, Edward Suydam, the Chief Executive Officer of Nano Mask, Inc. (Nano Mask), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the accompanying Form 10-Q of Nano Mask for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nano Mask.  /s/ Edward Suydam Edward Suydam Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Nano Mask, Inc.  September 9, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000928373
<NAME> LONE WOLF ENERGY, INC.
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,972
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,250
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,222)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,830)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,830)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 8



Subsidiaries of the Company



Following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company, ownership percentages, and the jurisdictions of incorporation or organization of each as of March 13, 2008. Each subsidiary does business in its own name only.



|Subsidiary                                     | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
or Organization
|---------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------
|                                               |                                              
|MMM Exploraciones S.A. de C.V. (100%)          |                                              
|Metallica (Barbados) Inc. (100%)               |                                              
|De Re Holdings Inc. (100%) (inactive)          |                                              
|Desarrollos Metallica C.A. (100%)
(inactive)   |                                              
|Datawave Sciences Inc. (100%)                  |                                              
|Minera Metallica Ltda. (100%)                  |                                              
|Metallica Management Inc. (100%)               |                                              
|Raleigh Mining International Ltd. (100%)       |                                              
|Minera San Xavier, S.A. de C.V. (100%)         |                                              
|Servicios del Plata y Oro, S.A. de C.V. (100%) |                                              
|Great Frontier Resources Inc. (100%)           |                                              
|Metallica Resources Alaska Inc. (100%)         |                                              





---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunterra Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/    STEVEN E. WEST
|                     



Dated: November 14, 2003
#### In re: Sean Lamont DUDLEY, a/k/a John D. Brown, Petitioner.

No. 10-2369.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 31, 2011.

Decided: April 4, 2011.

Sean Lamont Dudley, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sean Lamont Dudley has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus. In his petition, Dudley asks this court to order the district court to establish that it had authority to accept his guilty plea under Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(b)(3) (requiring a district court to determine whether there is a factual basis for a guilty plea). To obtain mandamus relief, a petitioner must show that:

> (1) he has a clear and indisputable right to the relief sought; (2) the responding party- has a clear duty to do the specific act requested; (3) the act requested is an official act or duty; (4) there are no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires; and (5) the issuance of the writ will effect right and justice in the circumstances.

*In re Braxton,*258 F.3d 250, 261 (4th Cir.2001) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We have considered Dudley’s petition and conclude that Dudley is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny Dudley’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jonathan Clark, Appellant.

[987 NYS2d 239]

*906Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Holder, J.), imposed November 27, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

A defendant who has validly waived the right to appeal cannot invoke this Court’s interest of justice jurisdiction to obtain a reduced sentence *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]). Here, however, the Court is not precluded from exercising its interest of justice jurisdiction because the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid. The record does not demonstrate that the defendant “grasped the concept of the appeal waiver and the nature of the right he was forgoing” *(People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; *see People v Grant,*83 AD3d 862, 862-863 [2011]; *People v Pelaez,*100 AD3d 803, 804 [2012]; *People v Jacob,*94 AD3d 1142, 1143 [2012]; *People v Mayo,*77 AD3d 683, 684 [2010]; *cf. People v Ramos,*7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]). Therefore, “notwithstanding the written appeal waiver form, it cannot be said that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal” *(People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d at 267; *see People v Elmer,*19 NY3d 501, 510 [2012]; *People v Vasquez,*101 AD3d 1054 [2012]).

Nevertheless, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the period of postrelease supervision imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, EJ., Mastro, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Devendra Singh, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[988 NYS2d 85]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

Peters, EJ., Stein, Rose, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Exhibit 10.2

 

Amendment No. 1 to the LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. Amended and Reinstated 2008 Share Incentive Plan

 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 is made on June 9, 2014 by LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. (the “Company”).

 

WHEREAS, the Company adopted the LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. Amended and Reinstated 2008 Share Incentive Plan on October 27, 2008 (the “Plan”);

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan as set forth below;

 

WHEREAS, subject to approval of the shareholders of the Company, the Board may amend the Plan as set forth below pursuant to Section 13 of the Plan;

 

WHEREAS, the Board has approved this Amendment No. 1 on May 14, 2014; and

 

WHEREAS, the shareholders of the Company have approved this Amendment No. 1 on the date hereof.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as set forth below:

 

Section 3(a) of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following new Section 3(a):

 

“3.           Shares Subject to the Plan

 

(a)           Subject to the provisions of Section 10 below, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to all Awards (including Incentive Share Options) is 11,344,444 Shares.”
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                                  A.S.V., INC.
                 EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    2002             2001              2000
                                                                    ----             ----              ----
<S>                                                           <C>               <C>              <C>
BASIC
   Earnings
     Net earnings                                             $   1,353,129     $     755,668    $   1,450,909
                                                              =============     =============    =============

   Shares
     Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding                                        10,170,645        10,215,855        9,782,919
                                                              =============     =============    =============

   Earnings per common share                                  $         .13     $         .07    $         .15
                                                              =============     =============    =============

DILUTED
   Earnings
     Net earnings                                             $   1,353,129     $     755,668    $   1,450,909
                                                              =============     =============    =============

   Shares
     Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding                                        10,170,645        10,215,855        9,782,919
     Assuming exercise of options and warrants
       reduced by the number of shares which could
       have been purchased with the proceeds from
       the exercise of such options and warrants                     58,412           136,613          183,742
                                                              -------------     -------------    -------------

     Weighted average number of common and
       common equivalent shares outstanding                      10,229,057        10,352,468        9,966,661
                                                              =============     =============    =============

   Earnings per common share                                  $         .13     $         .07    $         .15
                                                              =============     =============    =============
</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3127 

To direct the Architect of the Capitol to acquire a statue of ‘‘The Unknown 

Slave’’ for permanent display in Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor 

Center, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2009 

Mr. ACKERMAN (for himself and Mr. RANGEL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To direct the Architect of the Capitol to acquire a statue 

of ‘‘The Unknown Slave’’ for permanent display in 

Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STATUE OF ‘‘THE UNKNOWN SLAVE’’. 

4 Not later than 180 days after the enactment of this 

5 Act, the Architect of the Capitol (hereinafter in this Act 

6 referred to as the ‘‘Architect’’) shall solicit bids and enter 

7 into an agreement for the creation of a statue of ‘‘The 

8 Unknown Slave’’. The Architect shall acquire and permaVerDate Nov 24 2008 02:58 Jul 09, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3127.IH H3127

bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3127 IH

1 nently display that statue in Emancipation Hall in the 

2 Capitol Visitor Center. 

3 SEC. 2. CONSULTATION WITH CONGRESSIONAL BLACK 

4 CAUCUS. 

5 The Architect shall carry out this Act in consultation 

6 with the Congressional Black Caucus. 

Æ 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS