alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Billy G. ASEMANI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN; The Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution Khamenei; The Islamic Revolutionary Court; The Ministry of Intelligence and Security; The Counsel of Guardians; The Ministry of Islamic Culture and Guidance; The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps; Ali Fallahiankhuzestani; Hoffatol-Islam Nayerri, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-7431.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 3, 2008.

Decided: May 6, 2008.

Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice in this action filed under 18 U.S.C. § 2333 (2000). Although an order dismissing a complaint without prejudice generally is not an appealable order, *see Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc.,*415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir.2005), the district court’s order nonetheless qualifies as a final order subject to appeal because the action cannot be saved by merely amending the complaint. *See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993) (holding appellate court may evaluate particular grounds for dismissal to determine whether plaintiff could save action by merely amending complaint).

The district court properly found Asemani failed to establish he was a national of the United States under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(22) (2000). We therefore conclude the district court correctly decided Asemani lacked standing to proceed under 18 U.S.C. § 2333(a) (2000). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We deny Asemani’s motions for oral argument and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *288and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
1

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-3763

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western 

* District of Arkansas.

Gary Michael Gatliff, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: June 4, 2004

Filed: June 17, 2004

___________

Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Gary Michael Gatliff pleaded guilty to willfully and knowingly transmitting in

interstate commerce a telephone communication containing a threat to injure a person,

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c). The district court1

 sentenced him to 18 months

imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, he argues that the district

court should have granted his motion for a downward departure based on his reduced

mental capacity. Given the district court’s explicit recognition of its authority to
-2-

depart, its decision not to do so is unreviewable. See United States v. Koons, 300

F.3d 985, 993-94 (8th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we affirm. 

______________________________
#### Phelps *vs.*Thurman.

[This case was argued at the last term, and the decision reserved.]

Where, to a suit to recover damages for the wrongful and malicious suing out and levying of a distress warrant, and the procuring of a warrant to dispossess plaintiff of certain premises, and actually dispossessing him thereunder, the defendant filed a plea in the following words: “ And now comes the defendant, . . and for further plea in this behalf says that he was authorized by law to have the distress warrant and dispossessory warrant set out by plaintiff's declaration issued and put into effect or executed, and that the defendant was justified in taking out the same, and that he did so in the utmost good faith and without malice; and of this he.puts himself upon the country,” this was only a plea of the general issue, putting in issue the main allegations in the declaration, and was not such a plea of justification as gave the defendant the right to open and conclude. 69 *Ga.,*250; 72 *Id.,*217.

(a.) The right to open and conclude to the jury is an important right, and the presumption is that the party to whom it has been improperly denied has been injured.

(6.) No other error of material character appears in this case.

Judgment reversed.

February *24,*1885.

Blandeord, Justice.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan LOPEZ-SANABRIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40751

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 7, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Philip Thomas Cowen, Esq., Law Office of Philip Cowen, Brownsville, TX, for De-fendanfi-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Lopez-Sanabria has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Lopez-Sanabria has filed motions requesting this court to eorx-ect immigration records to show that he is a naturalized citizen. We lack jurisdiction to gx-ant the x-elief that Lopez-Sanabxda requests. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s bx-ief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, Lopez-San-*411abria’s motions are DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>


                                                               EXHIBIT 23



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To Board of Directors
Strouds, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-34684 and No. 333-91515) of our report dated April 18, 2000,
relating to the balance sheets of Strouds, Inc. as of February 26, 2000 and
February 27, 1999 and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
February 26, 2000, which report appears in the February 26, 2000 Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Strouds, Inc.



/s/KPMG LLP
--------------------------
Los Angeles, California
May 24, 2000
##### 



Exhibit 21.1 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY Subsidiary Name
    
    State of IncorporationAlarcon Holdings, Inc.
    
    New YorkCadena Estereotempo, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoJuJu Media, Inc.
    
    New YorkKLAX Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKLEY Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKPTI, Inc. Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKRZZ Licensing, LLC
    
    DelawareKSAH Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKTCY Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKXOL Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKZAB Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKZBA Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawarePortorican American Broadcasting, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoSBS Bay Area, LLC
    
    DelawareSBS Funding, Inc.
    
    DelawareSBS of Greater New York, Inc.
    
    New YorkSBS Promotions, Inc.
    
    New YorkSpanish Broadcasting System Finance Corporation
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System Group of Puerto Rico, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoSpanish Broadcasting System Holding Company, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoSpanish Broadcasting System Inc.
    
    New JerseySpanish Broadcasting System Network, Inc.
    
    New YorkSpanish Broadcasting System of California, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaSpanish Broadcasting System of Florida, Inc.
    
    FloridaSpanish Broadcasting System of Greater Miami, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System of Illinois, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System of Puerto Rico, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System of Puerto Rico, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoSpanish Broadcasting System of San Antonio, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System SouthWest, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System-San Francisco, Inc.
    
    DelawareWCMA Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWCMQ Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWDEK Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWEGM, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWIO, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWKIE Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWKIF Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWLEY Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWMEG Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWNOD, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWODA, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWOQI, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWPAT Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWRMA Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWSKQ Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWXDJ Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWZET Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWZNT, Inc.
    
    Puerto Rico
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Intermost
Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation (the “Company”) with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”), the undersigned, Chia Hsun Wu, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, that to the best of his
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





This certification is being provided
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is
it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.





Date:
February 12, 2010





By:Chia
      Hsun Wu
                  Chief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 21.1
 List of Subsidiaries of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
 Subsidiary Name
    
    State of IncorporationAlarcon Holdings, Inc.
    
    New YorkCadena Estereotempo, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoGabriel Productions, LLC
    
    DelawareGabriel Series I, LLC
    
    DelawareJuJu Media, Inc.
    
    New YorkKLAX Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKLEY Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKPTI Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKRZZ Licensing, LLC
    
    DelawareKSAH Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKXOL Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKZAB Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareKZBA Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareMega Media Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareMegafilms, Inc.
    
    DelawareMegaflix, Inc.
    
    DelawareMegaholdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareMegapics, Inc.
    
    DelawarePortorican American Broadcasting, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoSBS Bay Area, LLC
    
    DelawareSBS Funding, Inc.
    
    DelawareSBS Miami Broadcast Center, Inc.
    
    DelawareSBS of Greater New York, Inc.
    
    New YorkSBS Promotions, Inc.
    
    New YorkSpanish Broadcasting System Finance Corporation
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System Group of Puerto Rico,
Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoSpanish Broadcasting System Holding Company, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoSpanish Broadcasting System Inc. (NJ)
    
    New JerseySpanish Broadcasting System Network, Inc.
    
    New YorkSpanish Broadcasting System of California, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaSpanish Broadcasting System of Florida, Inc.
    
    FloridaSpanish Broadcasting System of Greater Miami, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System of Illinois, Inc.
    
    Delaware




---



##### 



Subsidiary Name
    
    State of IncorporationSpanish Broadcasting System of Puerto Rico, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System of Puerto Rico, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoSpanish Broadcasting System of San Antonio, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System SouthWest, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpanish Broadcasting System-San Francisco, Inc.
    
    DelawareWCMA Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWCMQ Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWDEK Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWEGM, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWIO, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWKIE Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWKIF Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWLEY Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWMEG Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWNOD, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWODA, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWOQI, Inc.
    
    Puerto RicoWPAT Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWRMA Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWSBS Licensing Inc. (f/k/a WDLP Licensing, Inc.)
    
    DelawareWSKQ Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWXDJ Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWZET Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareWZNT, Inc.
    
    Puerto Rico
/ 

(l 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

ANGELA DENISE NAILS, ) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Plaintiff, 

v. Civil Action No. 

CIVILIAN CLAIMS DISABILITY, 

Defendant. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

FEB i ~. ~Dl1 Clerk. U.S. District & B k 

Courts tor the District OfanC r,uptcy 

o umbla 

.11 (J~6~J 

This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiffs application to proceed in 

forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The court will grant the application, and dismiss the 

complaint. 

The Court has reviewed plaintiffs complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by 

pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted 

by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, 

must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 

(D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint 

contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, a 

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand 

for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum 

standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to 

prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the 
doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). 

Plaintiff alleges that she "was injured while [she] was a Civilian employee," and that she 

"is seeking the damages that was [sic] never paid ... when [she] was injured." Compi. at 1. 

Although plaintiff clearly states her demand for $100,000 in "damages for Pain and Suffering, 

Medical cost[s] and Mental disfigurement," id. at 2, her complaint does not allege facts sufficient 

to provide fair notice to defendant of the claims against it. As drafted, the complaint fails to 

comply with Rule 8(a) and it will be dismissed. 

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. 

United ~K&-~ States DistJct JUdge~ DATE: F.J. '1/ /;Ln c¥ 

2
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunterra Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and as of the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ STEVEN E. WEST     
|Steven E. West         
|Chief Financial Officer
|Dated: February 9, 2005
#### Victoria Davenport, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Daniel Davenport, Deceased, Plaintiff, v County of Nassau et al., Appellants, Robert Daly et al., *332Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[666 NYS2d 28]

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendants County of Nassau and Nassau County Medical Center appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), entered September 9, 1996, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 2304 to quash a subpoena duces tecum, and directed them to provide the respondents with a complete copy of the injured plaintiffs hospital record at a charge of $.75 per page.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum is granted.

The respondents are not “qualified person[s]” as defined in Public Health Law § 18 (1) (g). Therefore, the appellants are not subject to the limit of $.75 per page imposed by statute *(see,*Public Health Law § 18 [2] [e]) on the amount which may be charged to qualified persons in connection with the photocopying of records *(see, Boltja v Southside Hosp.,*186 AD2d 774, *affg*153 Misc 2d 568, declining to follow *Matter of Casillo v St. John’s Episcopal Hosp.,*151 Misc 2d 420; *see also, Matter of Hernandez v Lutheran Med. Ctr.,*104 AD2d 368 [$1 per page reasonable]; *Matter of Scott v State of New York,*186 AD2d 571 [$2 per page reasonable]; *Hayes v County of Nassau,*127 AD2d 742). Because the appellants are willing to produce the records requested upon payment of the fees which they have established, the subpoena duces tecum is unnecessary. Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.
#### Ronald J. Zimmerman et al., Appellants, v Donald J. Rosier et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[665 NYS2d 498]

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr.,*155 AD2d 435; *see also,*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, Jr., J.—Set Aside Verdict.) Present—Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.
Exhibit 21

POLYMER GROUP, INC.  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

The
following comprises a list of the subsidiaries of the Company as of January 1, 2005:

PGI
Polymer, Inc.
DT Acquisition Inc.
Fabrene Group, L.L.C.
Bonlam (S.C.), Inc.
FabPro Oriented Polymers, Inc.
Chicopee, Inc.
PGI Nonwovens (Mauritius)
Dominion Textile Mauritius, Inc.
Bonlam S.A. de C.V.
Fabrene, Inc.
Loretex Corporation
Dominion Textile (USA) Inc.
Fabrene Corp.
Nanhai Nanxin Non-Wovens Co. Ltd.
Dominion Nonwovens Sudamerica, S.A.
Bonlam Andina Ltd.
Bonlam Holdings BV
DIFCO Performance Fabrics, Inc.
FiberTech Group, Inc.
PNA Corp.
PGI Europe, Inc.
Poly-Bond Inc.
Pristine Brands Corporation
Polyionix Separation Technologies, Inc.
Technetics Group, Inc.
FNA Polymer Corp.
Chicopee Holdings B.V.
FiberGol Corporation
FNA Acquisition, Inc.
PGI Holdings BV
Chicopee Holdings CV
PGI Nonwovens BV
PGI Neunkirchen GmbH
PGI Ltd.
PGI Nonwovens A.B.
Geca Tapes B.V.
Albuma S.A.S.
Geca Tapes PTE LTD
Nordlys SAS

---



QuickLinks
(19) I947A 4N;to 

cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge 

Turco & Draskovich 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Marisela L. Ponce 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 48251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22379]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-NER-GETT-24089; PPMPSPD1Z.YM0000, PPNEGETTS1]


Cancellation of September 14, 2017, Meeting of the Gettysburg 
National Military Park Advisory Commission

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Cancellation of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice 
is hereby given that the September 14, 2017, meeting of the Gettysburg 
National Military Park Advisory Commission previously announced in the 
Federal Register, Vol. 82, January 19, 2017, pp. 6641-6642, is 
cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Justice, Acting Superintendent 
and Designated Federal Official, Gettysburg National Military Park, 
1195 Baltimore Pike, Suite 100, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325, at 
(717) 334-1124 or via email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c3e3530300336292f28353f391c322c2f723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66040f0a0a390c1315120f05032608161548010910">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission was established by Public Law 
101-377 (16 U.S.C. 430g-8), to advise the Secretary of the Interior on 
the coordination of the management of the Gettysburg National Military 
Park and Gettysburg Battlefield Historic District with local 
jurisdictions.

Alma Ripps,
Chief, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-22379 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4312-52-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit ___

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Skuli Thorvaldsson, certify that:

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Creative Development Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 7 , 2006

/s/ Skuli Thorvaldsson
--------------------------------
Skuli Thorvaldsson
Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of R&G Financial Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
undersigneds best knowledge and belief: (a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated this 9th day of August, 2004. R&G Financial Corporation(Company)/s/ VICTOR J. GALANVíctor J. GalánChief Executive Officer/s/ JOSEPH R. SANDOVALJoseph R. SandovalChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.