alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3159 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3159

To provide for the apportionment of funds to airports for fiscal years 
2011 and 2012 based on passenger boardings during calendar year 2008 to 
  prevent additional harm to airports already harmed by the financial 
                    crisis, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2009

   Mr. Smith of Nebraska (for himself, Mr. Kissell, and Mr. Shuster) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the apportionment of funds to airports for fiscal years 
2011 and 2012 based on passenger boardings during calendar year 2008 to 
  prevent additional harm to airports already harmed by the financial 
                    crisis, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Airport Relief Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. APPORTIONMENT OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN AIRPORT PROJECTS.

    Section 47114(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
                    ``(H) Special rule for fiscal years 2011 and 
                2012.--Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the Secretary 
                shall apportion to the sponsor of an airport for fiscal 
                year 2011 or fiscal year 2012 an amount based on the 
                number of passenger boardings at the airport in 
                calendar year 2008 if the airport had--
                            ``(i) fewer than 10,000 passenger boardings 
                        in the calendar year used to calculate the 
                        apportionment for that fiscal year under 
                        subparagraph (A); and
                            ``(ii) 10,000 or more passenger boardings 
                        in calendar year 2008.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Lydia M. and Another, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Commissioner of Social Services et al., Respondents; Cynthia M., Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 487]

—In two proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights based upon permanent neglect, Cynthia M. appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of two orders of the Family Court, Kings County (Cordova, J.), both dated February 1, 1995, as, after fact-finding hearings, found that the appellant had permanently neglected Lydia M. and *518Jashaun Maurice M., and, after dispositional hearings, terminated her parental rights.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The record supports the Family Court’s findings that the agency exerted diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship *(see, Matter of Gregory B.,*74 NY2d 77). Furthermore, the record supports the finding that the mother failed to plan for the return of her children *(see, Matter of Stephen Anthony M.,*237 AD2d 363; *Matter of Natanya Sharay G.,*232 AD2d 487; *Matter of Maldrina R.,*219 AD2d 723).

The record does not support the mother’s contention that she was deprived of effective assistance of counsel *(see, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137; *Matter of Claudina Paradise Damans B.,*227 AD2d 135; *Matter of Angela Marie N.,*223 AD2d 423). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Joy and Lemer, JJ., concur.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3350 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the waiver period with 

respect to a deductible made by a veteran for certain travel costs necessary to receive treatment at facilities of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2011 

Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the waiver 

period with respect to a deductible made by a veteran 

for certain travel costs necessary to receive treatment 

at facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Travel Bene5 fits Modernization Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3350 IH

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER PERIOD FOR DEDUCTIBLE REQUIRED BY 

2 VETERANS TO RECEIVE CERTAIN TRAVEL 

3 COSTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 111(c)(4) of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(4)(A) The Secretary may waive the deduction re7 quirement of paragraph (1) in the case of the travel of 

8 any veteran for whom the imposition of the deduction 

9 would cause severe financial hardship. Except as provided 

10 by subparagraph (C), any waiver granted under this sub11 paragraph shall be valid until the date that is the earlier 

12 of— 

13 ‘‘(i) the date that is one year after the date on 

14 which the waiver is granted; or 

15 ‘‘(ii) the date on which the Secretary deter16 mines that the deduction would no longer cause the 

17 veteran severe financial hardship. 

18 ‘‘(B) The Secretary shall prescribe in regulations the 

19 conditions under which a finding of severe financial hard20 ship is warranted for purposes of this paragraph. 

21 ‘‘(C) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), any waiver 

22 granted under this paragraph to a veteran between the 

23 period beginning on January 1, 2011, and ending on June 

24 1, 2012, shall be deemed to be valid until the date that 

25 is the earlier of— 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3350 IH

1 ‘‘(i) the birthday of the veteran occurring after 

2 June 1, 2012; or 

3 ‘‘(ii) the date on which the Secretary deter4 mines that the deduction would no longer cause the 

5 veteran severe financial hardship.’’. 

6 (b) CLARIFICATION IN VETERANS HEALTH ADMINIS7 TRATION HANDBOOK.—Not later than 30 days after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Vet9 erans Affairs shall revise the Veterans Health Administra10 tion Handbook to clarify the waiver period of waivers 

11 granted under section 111(c)(4) of title 38, United States 

12 Code, as amended by subsection (a). 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to waivers granted 

15 under section 111(c)(4) of title 38, United States Code, 

16 on or after the date that is 30 days after the date of the 

17 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

MATTSON TECHNOLOGY, INC.    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I,
Ludger Viefhues, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mattson Technology, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: March 22, 2005 |  | /s/LUDGER VIEFHUESLudger Viefhues Executive Vice President 
Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 11

                      CENTRAL TRACTOR FARM & COUNTRY, INC.

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (In thousands, except per share data)



                                                   Fiscal Year
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                     1994           1995          1996
                                   ---------      --------      --------
Primary:
Weighted average shares
   outstanding                         7,276        10,576        10,586
Net effect of dilutive stock
   options and stock warrant -
   based on treasury stock
   method                                515           443           400
                                   ---------      --------      --------
Total                                  7,791        11,019        10,986
                                   =========      ========      ========

Income from continuing
   operations                       $  5,181      $  8,185      $  8,744
Per share amount                        0.66          0.74          0.80
Net Income                             1,326         5,542         8,744
Per share amount                        0.17          0.50          0.80

Fully diluted:
Weighted average shares
   outstanding                         7,276        10,576        10,586
Net effect of dilutive stock
   options and stock warrant -
   based on treasury stock
   method                                515           443           400
Assumed conversion of
   7% convertible notes                   34           826           826
                                   ---------      --------      --------
Total                                  7,825        11,845        11,812
                                   =========      ========      ========

Income from continuing
   operations                       $  5,181      $  8,185      $  8,744
Add 7% convertible note
   interest, net of income tax
   effect                                 28           672           672
                                   ---------      --------      --------
                                    $  5,209      $  8,857      $  9,416
                                   =========      ========      ========

Per share amount                    $   0.66(A)   $   0.75(A)   $   0.80(A)

(A)      Fully diluted earnings per share are not presented as the affect of the
         assumed  conversion of the 7% convertible  note is antidilutive or less
         than 3% dilutive.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, M. Brinkley Morse, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.



|                     |  |                 |  |                                                                                     
|-------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2004 |  | By:             |  | /s/    M. BRINKLEY MORSE                                                            
|                     |  | Name:    Title: |  | M. Brinkley Morse Vice President, Finance and Operations and Chief Financial
Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6025
MARY M. GREEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JAMES LILLER, Superintendent, Pruntytown Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-95-1090-3) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 11, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary M. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Dawn E.Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days withinwhich to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on September 16, 1996;Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on October 18, 1996. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension ofthe appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.2





Certification of Vice President, Finance and Operations Pursuant to


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, M. Brinkley Morse, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Quest
Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.





By:

/s/    M. BRINKLEY MORSEName:        M. Brinkley Morse Title:          Vice President, Finance and Operations
[No. 67938-4-I.

Division One.

October 29, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Nelson Lee Sellers, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 11-1-06166-0, Steven C. González, J, entered October 20, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vince Luis Hocog CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10237.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 14, 2011.

Karon Virginia Johnson, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USHA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Hagatna, GU, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Howard Gustaf Trapp, Howard Trapp Incorporated, Hagatna, GU, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Vince Luis Hocog Cruz appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 130-month sentence imposed for possession of methamphetamine hydrochloride with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Cruz contends that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to hearsay statements introduced at trial. We decline to address this claim on direct appeal as the record is insufficiently developed, and Cruz’s legal representation was not so inadequate that it obviously denied the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. *See United States v. Ross,*206 F.3d 896, 900 (9th Cir.2000).

Cruz also contends that the district court erred because its Guidelines calculation was based upon the erroneous conclusion that the jury determined that he was responsible for 31.9 grams of methamphetamine hydrochloride. Although the district court erred by instructing the jury that the government was not required to prove the amount or quantity of methamphetamine hydrochloride; the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because the overwhelming and uncontested evidence indicated that Cruz was in possession of 31.9 grams of the substance. *See United States v. Gracidas-Ulibarry,*231 F.3d 1188, 1197-98 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc). Accordingly, the district court did not procedurally err by improperly calculating the Guidelines range. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                                          0001016628 
<NAME>                                         HOMESIDE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         31
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  184,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,523,750
<PP&E>                                         32,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,564,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,158,447
<BONDS>                                        855,825
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       531
<OTHER-SE>                                     550,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,564,859
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               72,746
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               39,733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                33,013
<INCOME-TAX>                                   12,875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            20,138 
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   20,138
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K of NitroMed, Inc. (the “Company”)for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,James G. Ham, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:  March 8, 2007 | /s/ JAMES G. HAM, III                                        |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | James G. Ham, III                                            |
|                      | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer  and Secretary |

 

 

----
#### In the Matter of Kevin O’Neill, Petitioner, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[859 NYS2d 183]

Determination of respondent Fire Department’s Commissioner, dated October 13, 2005, terminating petitioner’s employment as a firefighter, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [William A. Wetzel, J.], entered June 12, 2007), dismissed, without costs.

The penalty of termination for testing positive for marijuana during a random drug test under a zero tolerance policy in effect at the time of the decision does not shock the conscience *(see Trotta v Ward,*77 NY2d 827 [1991]; *Matter of Kirk v City of New York,*47 AD3d 406 [2008]; *Matter of McGovern v Safir,*266 AD2d 107 [1999]). Although petitioner alleges that changes have been made to the Fire Department’s policy regarding marijuana usage subsequent to petitioner’s termination, we reject petitioner’s claim that the changes should be retroactively applied to his case *(see Matter of Solomon v Department of Bldgs. of City of N.Y.,*46 AD3d 370, 372 [2007]). Concur—Saxe, J.P, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------

          CERTIFICATION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Intermost
Corporation (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Deng Xiang Xiong, Acting Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, does hereby certify, that to the best of his knowledge:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 17, 2007                      /s/ Deng Xiang Xiong
                                        --------------------
                                        Deng Xiang Xiong
                                        Acting Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.