alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,412,654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  140,959
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,213,176
<PP&E>                                         635,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                 354,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,245,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,718,062
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,160,000
<PREFERRED>                                  4,386,000
<COMMON>                                        18,538
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,037,556)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,245,044
<SALES>                                        487,304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               487,304
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,569,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,082,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,082,667)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,082,667)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Mymetics Corporation has two subsidiaries:

1.   6543 Luxembourg S.A. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mymetics Corporation)
     is a joint stock company organized under the laws of Luxembourg and does
     business under the name "6543 Luxembourg S.A."

2.   Mymetics Management Sarl (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mymetics
     Corporation) is a company organized under the laws of Switzerland and does
     business under the name " Mymetics Management Sarl "


As disclosed above under Item I, Mymetics S.A. (a 99.9% owned subsidiary of 6543
Luxembourg S.A.), a company organized under the laws of France, will be
dissolved under the control of the French court appointed judicial administrator
contingent upon certain events, probably in 2008. As a legal consequence of this
court order, Mymetics Corporation has formally lost control over its French
subsidiary.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      2,725,430
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      6,211,760
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            1,125,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 4,955,103
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      6,948,025
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        6,949,193
<LOANS>                                    77,463,372
<ALLOWANCE>                                   402,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            101,224,415
<DEPOSITS>                                 87,674,802
<SHORT-TERM>                                1,750,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         1,725,411
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        6,065
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 10,068,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            101,224,415
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             6,549,552
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             716,814
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              334,969
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            7,601,335
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          4,002,772
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          4,110,725
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       3,490,610
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             2,795,531
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,125,844
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  1,125,844
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  589,050
<EPS-BASIC>                                    1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.02
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.77
<LOANS-NON>                                   359,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                  204,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              353,541
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  76,324
<RECOVERIES>                                   35,092
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             402,309
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          402,309
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  
 1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), as amended; and
 2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Raúl Alarcón, Jr.Name:
    
    Raúl Alarcón, Jr.Title:
    
    Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and
President
CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD. AND RELATED COMPANIES
 Affiliates of the Registrant
  Affiliates
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationAquilex, Inc. (100%)
    
    United States of AmericaCayman Water Company Limited (100%)
    
    Cayman IslandsConsolidated Water (Bahamas) Limited (formerly, Waterfields Company Limited) (90%)
    
    The BahamasConsolidated Water (Belize) Limited (formerly, Belize Water Limited) (100%)
    
    BelizeConsolidated Water (Bermuda) Limited (Affiliate)
    
    BermudaDesalCo Limited (100%)
    
    Cayman IslandsOcean Conversion (BVI) Ltd. (Affiliate)
    
    The British Virgin IslandsOcean Conversion (Cayman) Limited (100%)
    
    Cayman Islands
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2950 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2950

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 30, 2009

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to allow for prepayment of 
  repayment contracts between the United States and the Uintah Water 
                         Conservancy District.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREPAYMENT OF CERTAIN REPAYMENT CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE UNITED 
              STATES AND THE UINTAH WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall allow for prepayment of the 
repayment contract no. 6-05-01-00143 between the United States and the 
Uintah Water Conservancy District dated June 3, 1976, and supplemented 
and amended on November 1, 1985, and on December 30, 1992, providing 
for repayment of municipal and industrial water delivery facilities for 
which repayment is provided pursuant to such contract, under terms and 
conditions similar to those used in implementing section 210 of the 
Central Utah Project Completion Act (Public Law 102-575), as amended. 
The prepayment--
            (1) shall result in the United States recovering the net 
        present value of all repayment streams that would have been 
        payable to the United States if this Act was not in effect;
            (2) may be provided in several installments to reflect 
        substantial completion of the delivery facilities being 
        prepaid, and any increase in the repayment obligation resulting 
        from delivery of water in addition to the water being delivered 
        under this contract as of the date of enactment of this Act;
            (3) shall be adjusted to conform to a final cost allocation 
        including costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation, but 
        unallocated as of the date of the enactment of this Act that 
        are allocable to the water delivered under this contract;
            (4) may not be adjusted on the basis of the type of 
        prepayment financing used by the District; and
            (5) shall be made such that total repayment is made not 
        later than September 30, 2019.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
FILED

June 22, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

 Filed: June 22, 1998

MICHAEL SCOTT EVANS, )

)

Petitioner/Appellant, )

)

Vs. ) Davidson Juvenile

)

) No. 01S01-9701-JV-00019 

KAREN MARIE BISSON STEELMAN, )

)

Respondent/Appellee. )

and

IN THE MATTER OF SEAN MICHAEL )

CRAWFORD, A CHILD UNDER 18 )

YEARS OF AGE, THOMAS MICHAEL )

CIHLAR, )

)

Petitioner/Appellant, )

) Davidson Circuit

Vs. )

) No. 01S01-9703-CV-00046

MARY ANN CRAWFORD and )

RONALD SHANE CRAWFORD, )

)

Respondents/Appellees. )

O R D E R

The appellants in these consolidated appeals have filed petitions for a

rehearing pursuant to Tenn. R. App. P. 39. We have considered all of the

arguments raised in the petitions, and we have found them to be without merit. It

is, therefore, ORDERED that the petitions are denied.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  Certification

I, Christian J.F. Rochet, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mymetics Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Dated: March 30, 2007                   /s/ Christian J.F. Rochet
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Christian J.F. Rochet
                                        Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

32.1              Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                  Financial Officer of VOXEL pursuant to Section 906 of
                  the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of VOXEL (the "Company") for
the year ended December 31, 1999 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael Anthony,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of VOXEL, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 17, 2008

                                      /s/Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Financial Officer
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 25, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00606-CV

ALEXIS RAY, ZSACOYA RAY & JACQUELINE RAY, Appellants 

V.

YELLOWSTONE BOULEVARD I, LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 2 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 1113117 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 17, 2018. The clerk’s record 

was filed July 27, 2018. No reporter’s record was filed. No brief was filed.

On August 16, 2018, this court issued an order stating that unless appellants

filed a brief on or before September 17, 2018, the court would dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
2

Appellants filed no brief or other response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered 

dismissed.

 PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Busby.
The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3808

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Western District of Arkansas.

Dennis Cordes, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: June 6, 1997

 Filed: June 18, 1997

___________

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Cordes appeals the 372-month sentence imposed by the District Court1

after he pleaded guilty to attempting to manufacture methamphetamine and

methcathinone, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 (1994). Cordes argues

for the first time that imposition of an obstruction-of-justice enhancement for having

escaped from custody while awaiting sentencing violates the Double Jeopardy Clause
-2-

because the District Court imposed the enhancement after his conviction in a separate

proceeding for escape. We affirm.

We "will not consider an issue raised for the first time on appeal absent a

showing of plain error resulting in a miscarriage of justice." United States v. Merritt,

982 F.2d 305, 306-07 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 979 (1993). We conclude

that the District Court did not commit plain error because Cordes’s sentence in the drug

case was within the combined statutory limits for the two drug offenses, and thus

imposition of the obstruction enhancement in the drug case after Cordes’s conviction

in the escape case did not violate double jeopardy. See Witte v. United States, 115

S. Ct. 2199, 2206-08 (1995) (holding that use of evidence of related criminal conduct

to enhance defendant’s sentence does not constitute punishment for that conduct within

meaning of Double Jeopardy Clause and that "where the legislature has authorized a

particular punishment range for a given crime, the resulting sentence within that range

constitutes punishment only for the offense of conviction for purposes of the double

jeopardy inquiry"); United States v. Bellrichard, 62 F.3d 1046, 1051-52 (8th Cir. 1995)

(holding that Witte compelled this court to reject defendant’s argument that imposition

of sentence based on conduct for which defendant had received obstruction

enhancement in previous proceeding violated double jeopardy), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct.

1425 (1996); see also United States v. Jernigan, 60 F.3d 562, 564-65 (9th Cir. 1995).

Although we ordinarily do not consider a pro se brief when a party is represented

by counsel, see United States v. Whitelaw, 86 F.3d 788, 789 (8th Cir. 1996), we have

reviewed Cordes’s pro se submissions and conclude that his arguments are without

merit.

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21985]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


SES Performance Review Board

AGENCY: National Transportation Safety Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the 
National Transportation Safety Board, Performance Review Board (PRB).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily T. Carroll, Chief, Human 
Resources Division, Office of Administration, National Transportation 
Safety Board, 490 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20594-0001, (202) 
314-6233.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c)(1) through (5) of Title 5, 
United States Code requires each agency to establish, in accordance 
with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one 
or more SES Performance Review Boards. The board reviews and evaluates 
the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the 
supervisor and considers recommendations to the appointing authority 
regarding the performance of the senior executive.
    The following have been designated as members of the 2017 
Performance Review Board of the National Transportation Safety Board 
(NTSB):

The Honorable Earl F. Weener; Member, National Transportation Safety 
Board, PRB Chair.
The Honorable T. Bella Dinh-Zarr, Member, National Transportation 
Safety Board.
Mr. Edward Benthall, Chief Financial Officer, National Transportation 
Safety Board.
Ms. Florence A.P. Carr, Director, Bureau of Trade Analysis, Federal 
Maritime Commission.
Ms. Susan A. Kantrowitz, Director, Office of Administration, National 
Transportation Safety Board (will review Edward Benthall's appraisal).
Ms. Jerold Gidner, Principal Deputy Special Trustee, Office of the 
Special Trustee for American Indians Department of the Interior.
Ms. Claudia J. Postell, Deputy Associate Commissioner, Office of Civil 
Rights and Equal Opportunity, Social Security Administration, PRB 
Alternate Member.

    Dated: October 5, 2017.
Candi R. Bing,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2017-21985 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P