alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ex 10.1 12.9.14




Exhibit 10.1


December 4, 2014


Andrew Cogan
New York, NY


Dear Andrew:
It is my pleasure to inform you that you will be a participant in the 2015 Knoll, Inc. Incentive Compensation Program.
We are counting on you to help us build on the positive momentum we created in 2014 across each of our business segments. We must strive to continue to gain share, improve our profitability, target under-penetrated markets, expand our reach into consumer and decorator channels and build a responsible and technologically efficient infrastructure across all our businesses to position Knoll for success in 2015 and beyond.
If you achieve your individual goals and Knoll makes its 2015 operating profit plan you can qualify for a total target incentive payout of one hundred percent (100%) of your base salary.
This award is subject to the approval of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors (or appropriate committee of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors), which may exercise discretion in adjusting your award up or down based on factors the Board of Directors (or appropriate committee of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors) deems appropriate, including Knoll’s performance relative to the industry, other macroeconomic factors and your individual performance.  You must be employed by Knoll on the date this award is distributed in order to receive this incentive.
I have great confidence in your ability to contribute to our success in 2015 and look forward to being able to present you with your award in early 2016.
Thank you for all that you do for Knoll.
Sincerely,
/s/ Burt Staniar
Burt Staniar
Chairman
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2995 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2995

  To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 to 
 clarify the low-income housing credits that are eligible for the low-
         income housing grant election, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2009

   Mr. Davis of Alabama (for himself, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. 
  Bachus, Mr. Cao, Mr. Melancon, Mr. Braley of Iowa, Mr. Fleming, Mr. 
  Scalise, and Mr. Boswell) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 to 
 clarify the low-income housing credits that are eligible for the low-
         income housing grant election, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disaster State Housing Recovery Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. LOW-INCOME HOUSING GRANT ELECTION.

    (a) Clarification of Eligibility of Low-income Housing Credits.--
Paragraph (1) of section 1602(b) of the American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``, plus any increase in the State housing 
        credit ceiling for 2009 attributable to any State housing 
        credit ceiling returned in 2009 to the State by reason of 
        section 1400N(c) of such Code (including as such section is 
        applied by reason of sections 702(d)(2) and 704(b) of the Tax 
        Extenders and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008)'' 
        after ``1986'' in subparagraph (A), and
            (2) by inserting ``, plus any increase in the State housing 
        credit ceiling for 2009 attributable to any additional State 
        housing credit ceiling made by reason of the application of 
        such section 702(d)(2) and 704(b)'' after ``such section'' in 
        subparagraph (B).
    (b) Application of Additional Housing Credit Amount for Purposes of 
2009 Grant Election.--Subsection (b) of section 1602 of such Act is 
amended by adding at the end the following flush sentence: ``For 
purposes of subparagraph (B), in the case of any area to which such 
section 702(d)(2) or 704(b) applies, section 1400N(c)(1)(A) of such 
Code shall be applied without regard to clause (i).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply as if included in the enactment of section 1602 of the American 
Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21821]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: October 16, 2017, 1:00 p.m. e.d.t.

PLACE: U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, 1750 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20006.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation 
Board (CSB) will convene a public meeting on October 16, 2017, starting 
at 1:00 p.m. EDT in Washington, DC, at the CSB offices located at 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 910. The Board will discuss open 
investigations, an update on recommendations, the status of audits from 
the Office of the Inspector General, and financial and organizational 
updates. An opportunity for public comment will be provided.

Additional Information

    The meeting is free and open to the public. If you require a 
translator or interpreter, please notify the individual listed below as 
the Contact Person for Further Information, at least three business 
days prior to the meeting.
    A conference call line will be provided for those who cannot attend 
in person. Please use the following dial-in number to join the 
conference: Dial in Number: 888-862-6557 Confirmation Number: 45765401.
    The CSB is an independent federal agency charged with investigating 
accidents and hazards that result, or may result, in the catastrophic 
release of extremely hazardous substances. The agency's Board Members 
are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. CSB 
investigations look into all aspects of chemical accidents and hazards, 
including physical causes such as equipment failure as well as 
inadequacies in regulations, industry standards, and safety management 
systems.

Public Comment

    The time provided for public statements will depend upon the number 
of people who wish to speak. Speakers should assume that their 
presentations will be limited to three minutes or less, but commenters 
may submit written statements for the record.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Hillary Cohen, Communications 
Manager, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#04747166686d67446777662a636b72"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a0a0f181613193a190918541d150c">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 446-8094. Further information about 
this public meeting can be found on the CSB Web site at: www.csb.gov.

    Dated: October 4, 2017.
Raymond C. Porfiri,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2017-21821 Filed 10-5-17; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 6350-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### 4400 Equities, Inc., Respondent, v Gurmit Singh Dhinsa, Also Known as Gurmeet Singh Dhinsa, Appellant.

[862 NYS2d 512]

In an action to recover damages for the breach of a commercial lease, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated May 21, 2007, as granted the plaintiffs renewed motion for summary judgment to the extent of awarding it summary judgment on the issue of liability and directing a hearing on the issue of damages.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the plaintiffs renewed motion for summary judgment is denied and, upon searching the record *(see*CPLR 3212 [b]), summary judgment is awarded to the defendant dismissing so much of the complaint as seeks to recover damages pertaining to the period from and after July 30, 1998.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the evidence in this case established that as of July 30, 1998, there was a surrender by operation of law, of the lease between the parties, which was accepted by the plaintiff *(see Riverside Research Inst. v KMGA, Inc.,*68 NY2d 689, 691-692 [1986]; *Centurian Dev. v Kenford Co.,*60 AD2d 96, 100 [1977]). However, we disagree with the proposition that the defendant is liable for any purported damages the plaintiff alleges accrued from and after that date *(see*
      *655
      *Underhill v Collins,*132 NY 269, 271 [1892]; *Bay Plaza Estates v New York Univ.,*257 AD2d 472, 473 [1999]; *Altamuro v Capoccetta,*212 AD2d 904, 905 [1995]). The provision upon which the Supreme Court relied in holding the defendant liable, paragraph 23 of the parties’ lease, is not applicable where, as here, there has been a surrender of the lease and acceptance thereof, and even if that were not so, the plaintiff did not comply with any of the notification provisions of that paragraph.

Accordingly, we search the record and award the defendant summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as seeks to recover damages pertaining to the period from and after July 30, 1998.

As for the balance of the plaintiffs complaint, which, inter alia, seeks to recover damages for the period prior to July 30, 1998, pertaining to “unpaid rents,” “additional rents,” and “destruction to the premises,” the plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Therefore, the Supreme Court erred in holding that the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment on the issue of liability with respect to that part of the complaint. Rivera, J.P, Ritter, Miller and Dillon, JJ, concur. *[See*2007 NY Slip Op 31443(U).]
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46990-46991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21707]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Termination; 10368--First Heritage Bank, Snohomish, 
Washington

    The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as Receiver for 
10368--First Heritage Bank, Snohomish, Washington (Receiver) has been 
authorized to take all actions necessary to terminate the Receivership 
Estate of First Heritage Bank (Receivership Estate); the Receiver has 
made all dividend distributions required by law.
    The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-
Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all 
documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which 
FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary; including but 
not limited to releases,

[[Page 46991]]

discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, assignments and deeds. 
Effective October 1, 2017, the Receivership Estate has been terminated, 
the Receiver discharged, and the Receivership Estate has ceased to 
exist as a legal entity.

    Dated: October 4, 2017.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2017-21707 Filed 10-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2
                               ------------

                              CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the
"Report") of AMCON Distributing Company (the "Company") for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2006, I, Andrew C. Plummer, Vice President and Acting
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

    (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
       of the Company.


Date: May 23, 2007            /s/ Andrew C. Plummer
                              -------------------------
                              Title: Vice President and
                               Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to AMCON Distributing Company and will be retained by AMCON
Distributing Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3113 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of the 

Elk River in the State of West Virginia for study for potential addition 

to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 7, 2009 

Mr. RAHALL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

a segment of the Elk River in the State of West Virginia 

for study for potential addition to the National Wild 

and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Upper Elk River Wild 

5 and Scenic Study Act’’. 


jbell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3113 IH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY. 

2 Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

3 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘( ) ELK RIVER, WEST VIRGINIA.—The approxi6 mate 5-mile segment of the Elk River from the con7 fluence of the Old Field Fork and the Big Spring 

8 Fork in Pocahontas County to the Pocahontas and 

9 Randolph County line.’’. 

10 SEC. 3. STUDY AND REPORT. 

11 Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

12 U.S.C. 1276(b)) is amended by adding at the end the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘( ) ELK RIVER, WEST VIRGINIA.—Not later 

15 than 3 years after funds are made available to carry 

16 out this paragraph, the Secretary of Agriculture 

17 shall complete the study of the 5-mile segment of the 

18 Elk River, West Virginia, designated for study in 

19 subsection (a), and shall submit to Congress a re20 port containing the results of the study. The report 

21 shall include an analysis of the potential impact of 

22 the designation on private lands within the 5-mile 

23 segment of the Elk River, West Virginia, or abutting 

24 that area.’’. 


jbell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3113 IH

1 SEC. 4. EFFECT. 

2 (a) EFFECT ON ACCESS FOR RECREATIONAL ACTIVI3 TIES.—Consistent with section 13 of the Wild and Scenic 

4 Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1284), nothing in the designation 

5 made by the amendment in section 2 shall be construed 

6 as affecting access for recreational activities otherwise al7 lowed by law or regulation, including hunting, fishing, or 

8 trapping. 

9 (b) EFFECT ON STATE AUTHORITY.—Consistent 

10 with section 13 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

11 U.S.C 1284), nothing in the designation made by the 

12 amendment in section 2 shall be construed as affecting 

13 the authority, jurisdiction, or responsibility of the several 

14 States to manage, control, or regulate fish and resident 

15 wildlife under State law or regulations, including the regu16 lation of hunting, fishing, and trapping. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Michael P. May, the Chief Executive
Officer of iSECUREtrac Corp. (the "Company"), and James E. Stark, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that:



|Dated: August 13, 2002                                  |  |                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|/s/MICHAEL P. MAYMichael P. May
Chief Executive Officer |  | /s/JAMES E. STARKJames E. Stark
Chief Financial Officer

15

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,781
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,831)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,781)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,781)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>LESS THAN .01 PER SHARE
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
     STAEMENTS  CONTAINED IN THE  SEPTEMBER 30, 1997  QUARTERLY  REPORT FILED ON
     FORM  10-  QSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                     SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                           3,537,056
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    97,154
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 3,703,907
<PP&E>                                                           33,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   (2,707)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   3,830,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            20,743
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         9,567
<OTHER-SE>                                                       3,800,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     3,809,758
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 0
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    251,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (202,628)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (202,628)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (.02)
        


</TABLE>
no adequate legal remedy. 

### See In re A.B., 128 Nev. „ 291 P.3d 122,

126 (2012) (recognizing that an extraordinary writ petition was an appropriate vehicle to challenge an order that dismissed a petition alleging abuse and neglect). It is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. 

### Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

We have considered the petition and the answer thereto, and we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. Although the abuse and neglect petition was not filed within ten days after the protective custody hearing, the hearing master found good cause for the delay. 

### See NRS 432B.490(1)(b). 1 The master's findings and recommendation were affirmed by the district court. Accordingly, we deny the petition. 

### See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (stating that the issuance of an extraordinary writ is purely discretionary with this court).

It is so ORDERED. 2 

# P
C0.4.0WOL., , J. Parraguirre Cherry
'We take judicial notice that NRS 432B.490 as substantively amended on May 24, 2013. 

### See A.B. 174, 77th Leg. (Nev. 2013).

2 In light of this order, we deny as moot petitioner's request for a stay. Hardesty

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2

### cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division Special Public Defender Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 

### 3

M=IKI