alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<MULTIPLIER>1
       
<CAPTION>
Exhibit 27: Financial Data Schedule
<S>									<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>						12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>					DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>						JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>						DEC-31-1998
<CASH>								5,189,863
<SECURITIES>						0
<RECEIVABLES>						12,369,594
<ALLOWANCES>						0
<INVENTORY>							940,125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>					19,280,282
<PP&E>								654,188,458
<DEPRECIATION>						50,323,285
<Total Assets>						708,139,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>				19,991,706
<BONDS>								601,249,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>				0
<PREFERRED>							0
<COMMON>							0
<OTHER-SE>							0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>		708,139,691
<SALES>								159,183,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>					159,183,399
<CGS>								70,118,893
<TOTAL-COSTS>						80,635,026
<Other-Costs>						10,516,133
<LOSS-PROVISION>					0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>					58,868,345
<Income-before-taxes>				21,354,967
<INCOME-TAX>						0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>					21,354,967
<DISCONTINUED>						0
<EXTRAORDINARY>						0
<CHANGES>							0
<NET-INCOME>						21,354,967
<EPS-PRIMARY>						0
<EPS-DILUTED>						0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>  1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PETERSON SULLIVAN P.L.L.C.
601 UNION STREET  SUITE 2300  SEATTLE WA  98101  (206) 382-7777   FAX 382-7700
                                                 CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS







                        Independent Auditors' Consent
                        -----------------------------




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (No. 333-15831 and 333-15829) on Form S-8 of Ichor Corporation and
Subsidiaries of our report dated February 28, 1998, relating to the balance
sheets of Ichor Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996,
and the related statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows
for the year ended December 31, 1997, and the eleven months ending December
31, 1996, which report appears in the Annual Report of Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997, of Ichor Corporation and Subsidiaries.


/s/ Peterson Sullivan  P.L.L.C.
March 25, 1998
Seattle, Washington
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LARRY D. WHEATCRAFT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-427

February 28, 2024

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Michael F. Andrews, 

Judge.

Sara B. Mollo, Public Defender, and W. Randall Harper, Assistant Public 

Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 24-0005 

IN RE MOTION OF GENEVIEVE M. ZIMMERMAN 

FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF 

MONTANA 

FILED 

MAR - 5 2024 

Bovven Greenvvood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

Slate of 4Aontana 

ORDER 

Genevieve M. Zimmerman has moved for admission to the Bar of the State of 

Montana pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar 

Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the 

Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Zimmerman has provided the 

necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on 

motion under Rule V. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Genevieve M. Zimmerman may be swom in to the practice of law in the 

State of Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of 

the Clerk of the Montana Supreme Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State 

Bar of Montana• 

DATED this —day of March, 2024. 

f/, 7 Ze/ \?

Chief Justice 

1 

03/05/2024

Case Number: PR 24-0005
tal 

Justices 

2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of LCC International, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) |  | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2004, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, our financial condition and results of operations.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ C. Thomas Faulders, III

C. Thomas Faulders, III
Chief Executive Officer
May , 2004
#### In the Matter of Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, Respondent, v Paul Kane, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 138]

—Order, Family Court, New York County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered on or about April 19, 1996, which directed respondent to make child support payments to petitioner, as assignee of respondent’s estranged wife, pursuant to Family Court Act § 415, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with Family Court that there exists no viable pendente lite support order from Supreme Court emanating from the divorce action pending in that court, both because respondent could not produce a complete copy of the purported order, and because he specifically testified before the Hearing Examiner that no such order exists. Where, as here, there is no Supreme Court order directing the payment of child support, and the child is a public charge, Family Court possesses jurisdiction to order a parent to pay child support notwithstanding the pendency of a divorce action involving that parent in Supreme Court (Family Ct Act § 464 [b]; *see, O’Connor v O’Connor,*146 AD2d 909, 911; *Weckelman v Weckelman,*78 AD2d 995). Moreover, even assuming the existence of the alleged order, Family Court had jurisdiction to entertain a proceeding to enforce or modify it, there being no recital in the only page of that order produced by respondent that Supreme Court was retaining exclusive jurisdiction over its enforcement or modification (Family Ct Act § 461 [b]; *see, Neil v Neil,*232 AD2d 771). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, LP, (the Partnership) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2008                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                                  
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                            
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and
will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Douglas F. Garn, Chief Executive Officer of Quest Software, Inc. (the Company), and Scott J. Davidson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies
that, to the best of his or her knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 11thday of May, 2009.



|                        |  |  |  |                         
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|/s/    Douglas F. Garn  |  |  |  | /s/    Scott J. Davidson
|Douglas F. Garn         |  |  |  | Scott J. Davidson       
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Quest Software, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenny Rosa Maysonet, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 866]

—Judgment *1147unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.— Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                [Key Bank USA, National Asscociation Letterhead]

Exhibit 99.1



June 30, 1998



The Chase Manhattan Bank
Corporate Trust Office
Chase Manhattan Bank, Trustee
450 W. 33rd Street, 14th Floor
New York, NY  10001

Attention:  JoAnn Manieri

In accordance with Section 13.10 of the Standard Terms and Conditions of
Agreement for 1995-A Grantor Trust, AFG 1996-A Grantor Trust, AFG 1996-B Grantor
Trust, AFG 1996-C Grantor Trust, and AFG 1996-D Grantor Trust. Key Bank USA,
National Association, successor to AutoFinance Group, Inc., as Servicer, I
hereby certify:

         1.       A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period
                  from July 1, 1997 to June 30, 1998, and of its performance
                  under the Agreement has been made under my supervision, and

         2.       To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
                  Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the
                  Agreements during such period.


Sincerely,



/s/ Thomas R. Blend
Thomas R. Blend
Vice President


cc:   Standard & Poors Corporation
      Moody's Investor Service
      Fitch Investor Services
      First Boston Corporation
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NitroMed, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Michael D. Loberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: March 30, 2004                      /s/ Michael D. Loberg
                                           ---------------------
                                           Michael D. Loberg
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6862

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES EDWARD DAWKINS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-95-9-V, CA-98-32-5-2-V) Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Edward Dawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: James Edward Dawkins appeals from the district court’s order declining to grant Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) relief from the final order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dawkins , Nos. CR-95-9-V; CA-98-32-5-2-V (W.D.N.C. filed May 1, 2001; entered May 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 31.2**Certification of the Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)I, Robert W. Pawlak, the Chief Financial Officer of Cohesant Technologies Inc. (the “Company”),certify that:(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.(4) The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company andwe have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
 

 
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (theCompany’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and(5) The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the Company’s internal controls over financialreporting.   /s/ Robert W. Pawlak     Robert W. Pawlak  Cohesant Technologies Inc.  Chief Financial Officer     February 23, 2007
Exhibit
      ___




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




I,
      Gary
      Herman, certify that:





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Creative Development Corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006
      (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                October 9, 2007/s/ Gary
              HermanGary
              HermanPresident
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 7, 2016

NO. 03-14-00320-CR

Alfredo Ayala, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the district court. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error 

in the district court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s judgment of 

conviction and remands the case for a new trial. Appellee shall pay all costs relating to this 

appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the June 30,
2000 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statement.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           22,246,834
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8,339,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1,200,820
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 38,466,205
<PP&E>                                            7,074,964
<DEPRECIATION>                                      851,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   46,270,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             9,533,678
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            142,675
<OTHER-SE>                                       36,186,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     46,270,328
<SALES>                                          14,916,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14,916,385
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 27,494,133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   41,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (11,776,598)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (11,776,598)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (11,776,598)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.83)



</TABLE>