alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Roger J. Blackburn, Respondent, v Gor-Mac Electric, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[667 NYS2d 549]

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed against defendant Gor-Mac Electric, Inc. Memorandum: Plaintiff was injured when he slipped while attempting to move a pipe threading machine onto a sheet of plywood. He alleged that an employee of defendant Gor-Mac Electric, Inc. (Gor-Mac), negligently cleaned up oil in the vicinity of the machine. Plaintiff asserted causes of action pursuant to Labor Law §§ 200 and 241 (6) and for common-law negli*1083gence. The Labor Law causes of action were dismissed upon stipulation, and Gor-Mac moved for summary judgment on the common-law negligence cause of action. Supreme Court denied the motion. We reverse.

There is no question that the Gor-Mac employee was acting within the scope of his employment when he cleaned up the oil *(see generally, Cornell v State of New York,*46 NY2d 1032, *rearg denied*47 NY2d 951). Gor-Mac established, however, that the employee was a “loaned servant”, that is, he was in the special service of defendant Eastman Kodak Company (Eastman Kodak) *(see, Ramsey v New York Cent. R. R. Co.,*269 NY 219). According to the affidavit of the president of Gor-Mac, the employee was loaned to Eastman Kodak on an as-needed basis, worked under the direct supervision and control of Eastman Kodak and took orders for work assignments from Eastman Kodak supervisory personnel. Thus, the employee was transferred for a limited time to the service of Eastman Kodak, and Gor-Mac was not responsible for his alleged negligence during that time period *(see, Parke-Bernet Galleries v Franklyn,*26 NY2d 13, 19). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present— Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4316-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


New Hampshire; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New Hampshire (FEMA-4316-DR), dated June 1, 2017, and 
related determinations.

DATES: The amendment was issued on September 21, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, James N. Russo, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Albert Lewis as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-21629 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 911-23-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Allied Security Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”) for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Daniel Sobolewski, Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|By: | /s/ Daniel Sobolewski                                 | 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Daniel Sobolewski                                     | 
|    | Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | (Principal Executive Officer)                         | 
|    | January 10, 2019                                      | 





A signed original of this certification
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000059440
<NAME> BROOK GROUP LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,396
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     36,316
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,147
<PP&E>                                         122,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          273,441
<BONDS>                                        240,475
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,094
<OTHER-SE>                                    (392,081)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,982
<SALES>                                         444,56
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               444,566
<CGS>                                          200,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,284
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,704
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (35,394)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (59,613)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,219
<DISCONTINUED>                                   3,208
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,427
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
        

</TABLE>
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 

HUYA Inc. - Class A Ordinary Shares 

(Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands) 
  

							
	Number	  		  	 	Shares	 
		  	  
 Share capital US$100,000 divided into 1,000,000,000
shares comprising of
 (i) 750,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.0001 each,

(ii) 200,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.0001 each, and

(iii) 50,000,000 shares of a par value of US$0.0001 each
	  			

  

			
	
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT        
	  	 
		
	is the registered holder of	  	 

 Shares in the above-named Company subject to the memorandum and articles of association thereof. 

EXECUTED for and on behalf of the Company on 
  

							
		  	DIRECTOR
**Exhibit 12.4**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I,Fernando Gardeweg R., certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Empresa Nacional deElectricidad S.A. (“Endesa Chile”); 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.    The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a)      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

(b)      designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c)      evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

(d)      disclosed in this report any change in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.    The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)      all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 2, 2014
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 9, 2009

1215 

# Order

January 9, 2009

137476

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137476 COA: 286480 Grand Traverse CC: 07-010478 ANTHONY CHARLES BENAK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 25, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY 

### , J., not participating.
EXHIBIT 3.1B

                          ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE
                          ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                                    AMVP INC.

     Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2-604 of the General Corporation Law
Of Maryland, the undersigned corporation adopts the following amendment to
its Articles Of Incorporation, which amendment was unanimously recommended for
approval by the corporation's board of directors and approved by the
corporation's sole stockholder:

     FIRST: The name of the corporation is AMVP Inc.

     SECOND: The following amendment to the Articles Of Incorporation was duly
adopted in accordance with Section 2-604 of the General Corporation Law of
Maryland:

          Article FIRST of the Articles Of Incorporation is amended to read in
     its entirety as follows:

          "FIRST. The name of the corporation is AmeriVest Properties Inc."

     THIRD: The Amendment does not provide for the exchange, reclassification or
cancellation of issued shares.

     FOURTH: The Amendment does not effect a change in the amount of stated
capital.

                                            AMVP INC., a Maryland corporation

                                            By:  /s/  James F. Etter
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      James F. Etter, President


ATTEST:

/s/  Robert J. McFann
----------------------------------
     Robert J. McFann, Secretary


STATE OF COLORADO      )
                       ) ss.
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON    )

     On this 29th day of June, 1999, before me personally appeared James F.
Etter, President of AMVP Inc., who, being duly sworn by me, acknowledged that he
executed the foregoing instrument in the name of said entity, that he had the
authority to execute same, and that he executed the same as the act and deed of
said entity for the uses and purposes therein stated.

      My commission expires: September 12, 2002     /s/  Notary Public
                             ------------------     ------------------
                                                         Notary Public

[SEAL]

<PAGE>


STATE OF COLORADO      )
                       ) ss.
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON    )

     On this 29th day of June, 1999, before me personally appeared Robert J.
McFann, Secretary of AMVP Inc., who, being duly sworn by me, acknowledged that
he executed the foregoing instrument in the name of said entity, that he had the
authority to execute same, and that he executed the same as the act and deed of
said entity for the uses and purposes therein stated.

      My commission expires: September 12, 2002     /s/  Notary Public
                             ------------------     ------------------
                                                         Notary Public
[SEAL]


                                    * * * * *
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roger Townley, Appellant.

[667 NYS2d 261]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), rendered June 26, 1995, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court’s *Sandoval*ruling was based upon a compromise that the defendant’s attorney had suggested at the hearing. Accordingly, the objections which he now seeks to raise on appeal are not preserved for appellate review *(see, People v Dudley,*143 AD2d 764). In any event, the ruling struck a fair balance between the prosecution’s interest in exploring the defendant’s veracity, and the potential prejudice that could result from informing the jury of his prior convictions *(see, People v Davis,*44 NY2d 269, 274).

The trial court, should, however, have granted the defendant’s request for a missing-witness charge in connection with the complainant’s neighbor, who testified before the Grand Jury that she saw the defendant cutting a screen to gain entry to the house. The defendant, having established that this witness had exclusive personal knowledge about a material issue in the case, and that she would naturally be expected to give testimony favorable to the prosecution, was entitled to the charge upon the prosecution’s failure to adequately demonstrate that she was unavailable to testify, or that the charge was otherwise inappropriate *(see, People v Gonzalez,*68 NY2d 424). Furthermore, contrary to the People’s argument, the defendant was not required to show how the testimony of the witness would have helped his case *(see, People v Kitching,*78 NY2d 532, 537 [defendant cannot be expected to specify what witness would have testified to—the witness not having been called, “this necessarily remains a matter of speculation”]).

*323Nevertheless, we find that the uncontroverted evidence that the defendant was found in the attic of the complainant’s house, six feet from a box of her jewelry which had been taken from her bedroom, overwhelmingly established the defendant’s guilt, and that the error was therefore harmless *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and Santucci, JJ., concur.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3349 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to recognize the distance education 

program developed by the Department of Defense to provide advanced 

joint professional military education through a combination of non-resident and resident instruction as equivalent to the joint professional 

military education phase II program consisting of exclusively of resident 

instruction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2011 

Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to recognize the 

distance education program developed by the Department 

of Defense to provide advanced joint professional military 

education through a combination of non-resident and 

resident instruction as equivalent to the joint professional 

military education phase II program consisting of exclusively of resident instruction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3349 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard and 

3 Reserve Equality in Education Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION TO USE NON-RESIDENT COMPO5 NENT TO PROVIDE PORTION OF JOINT PRO6 FESSIONAL MILITARY EDUCATION PHASE II 

7 PROGRAM OF INSTRUCTION. 

8 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF DISTANCE EDUCATION PRO9 GRAM FOR PHASE II INSTRUCTION.—Section 2154(a)(2) 

10 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 

11 ‘‘taught in residence at’’ and inserting ‘‘taught in resi12 dence at, or through a combination of distance learning 

13 and resident instruction by’’. 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT REGARDING DURA15 TION OF PRINCIPAL COURSE OF INSTRUCTION AT JOINT

16 FORCES STAFF COLLEGE.—Section 2156(a) of such title 

17 is amended by striking ‘‘than 10 weeks of resident instruc18 tion.’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘than— 

19 ‘‘(1) 10 weeks of resident instruction; or 

20 ‘‘(2) if the principal course of instruction in21 cludes a distance learning component, 160 hours of 

22 resident instruction.’’. 

23 (c) TREATMENT OF OFFICERS WHO PREVIOUSLY

24 COMPLETED DISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAM.—In the 

25 case of each officer of the Armed Forces who, before the 

26 date of the enactment of this Act, completed the distance 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3349 IH

1 education program developed by the Department of De2 fense to provide advanced joint professional military edu3 cation through a combination of distance learning and 

4 resident instruction, but who was awarded credit for only 

5 Phase I joint professional military education upon comple6 tion of the program, the Secretary of Defense shall award 

7 the officer retroactive credit for Phase II joint professional 

8 military education. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We haveissued our reports dated March 13, 2007, accompanying the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule (which report expressed an unqualifiedopinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of FinancialAccounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-BasedPayment,” and FASB Statement No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for DefinedBenefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans”) and management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in theAnnual Report of Polymer Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 30, 2006. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements ofPolymer Group, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-131156,effective January 20, 2006, File No. 333-121252, effective December 14,2004 and File No. 333-121254, effective December 14, 2004).

**/s/  GRANT THORNTON LLP**

**Columbia,South Carolina**

**March 13, 2007**

----