alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Office of Science, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Notice of renewal.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, and following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) has been renewed for a two-year period.

The Committee will provide advice and recommendations to the Director, Office of Science (DOE), and the Assistant Director, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (NSF), on scientific priorities within the field of basic nuclear science research.

Additionally, the renewal of the NSAC has been determined to be essential to conduct business of the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation, and to be in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon DOE and NSF, by law and agreement. The Committee will continue to operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, adhering to rules and regulations issued implementation of that Act.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Timothy Hallman at (301) 903-3613.

Issued in Washington, DC on September 29, 2017.

Shena Kennerly,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-21918 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


    We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Polymer Group, Inc. of our report dated January 23, 1997, included in
the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of Polymer Group, Inc.

    Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Polymer Group,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

    We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-04969) pertaining to the 1996 Key Employee Stock
Option Plan of Polymer Group, Inc. of our report dated January 23, 1997 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by
reference, and our report included in the preceeding paragraph with respect to
the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Polymer Group, Inc.






                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Greenville, South Carolina
January 23, 1997


                                      30
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

12

- 20756

GENEVE BUTANE, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff

–

Appellant Cross Appellee

,
v.

NATIONAL OIL CORPORATION

,

Defendant

,

v.

BP AMERICA, INCORPORATED

,

Garnishee

- Appellee Cross Appellant,

EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION; HESS CORPORATION; OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION,

Garnishees

– Appellees.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
No. 4:12

- CV

- 2205

Before OWEN, SOUTHWICK, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM : *

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 8, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-20756 Document: 00512493709 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2014Plaintiff Geneve Butane appeals the district court’s denial of its request

for additional discovery, the dismissal of its Supplemental Rule B proceeding,

and the vacatur of its order of attachment. We review the district court’s order

vacating the maritime attachment and dismissing the proceeding for an abuse

of discretion, though the legal conclusions underlying the order are reviewed

de novo. 1 We review the denial of the request for additional discovery for an

abuse of discreti on. 2

The parties are fam iliar with the facts of this case. After considering the

district court’s decision, the briefing, and the oral arguments, we conclude that

the district court did not abuse its discretion in vacating the attachment and

dismissing the proceeding without prejudice. We also conclude that the district

court did not abuse its discretion in denying Geneve additional discovery.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

1 Vitol, S.A. v. Prim e rose Shipping Co. , 708 F.3d 527, 541 ( 4 th Cir. 2013) ; Shipping Corp. of India v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd.

, 585 F.3d 58, 66 (2d Cir. 2009) ; c f. Great Prize, S.A. v. Mariner Shi pping Party, Ltd. , 967 F.2d 157, 160 (5th Cir. 1992).

2 United States ex rel. Taylor

- Vick v. Smith , 513 F.3d 228, 232 (5th Cir. 2008). Case: 12-20756 Document: 00512493709 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2014
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Yvonne Viruet, Respondent. McKenzie, McGhee & Harper, Appellant; John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 310]

Crew III, J. P.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 7, 1997, which *708ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Although we recognize that the determination of whether an employee voluntarily left his or her employment without good cause constitutes a factual question for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve, there nevertheless must be substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s decision in that regard. Based upon our review of the record before us, we cannot say that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding that claimant, a receptionist for a law firm, was justified in leaving her employment due to the “repeated [ ] and public[ ]” criticism of her work by one of the employer’s partners. Criticism of an employee’s performance by a supervisor does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment (see, *Matter of Baxter [Sweeney],*244 AD2d 623), even where harsh words are used (see, *Matter of Grubman*[Notaro—*Sweeney],*242 AD2d 767 [criticism included accusing the claimant of “milking” and “abusing” her position]; *Matter of Collins [Sweeney],*239 AD2d 758 [criticism included attacking the claimant’s teaching abilities and informing him that “if he did not like it he could leave”]). Claimant conceded that she was. not reprimanded in front of clients, and her testimony as to the circumstances under which her performance was called into question was inconsistent and, as a whole, does not support the Board’s finding that she was publicly humiliated by the partner. Accordingly, the Board’s decision must be reversed.

White, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is reversed, without costs, claim dismissed and matter remitted to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
Exhibit 4.3


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated April 25, 2018, with respect to the financial statement of Smart Trust 379 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-222945) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 25, 2018
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Edward H. Dickinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
                Edward H. DickinsonEdward
                H. Dickinson, Chief Financial OfficerMay
                10, 2007
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01



The Board of Directors
CyberGuard Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-06253) on Form S-3 of CyberGuard Corporation of our report dated September
11, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CyberGuard Corporation
and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1996 and September 30, 1995 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
the nine months ended June 30, 1996, the year ended September 30, 1995, and the
three months ended September 30, 1994, which report appears in the June 30,
1996, annual report on Form 10-K of CyberGuard Corporation.


                                   KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Miami, Florida
September 30, 1996
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Saint Angel, Appellant.

[861 NYS2d 950]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered March 30, 2006, convicting him of *383perjury in the first degree, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, and criminal possession of forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Moriah,*52 AD3d 534 [2008]).

The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Skelos, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Garni, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2814 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2814

  To immediately repeal the income limitation on conversions to Roth 
                                 IRAs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 2009

  Mr. Pitts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To immediately repeal the income limitation on conversions to Roth 
                                 IRAs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reinvest in America's Retirement Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. IMMEDIATE REPEAL OF INCOME LIMITATION ON CONVERSIONS TO ROTH 
              IRAS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 512 of the Tax Increase 
Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 is amended by striking 
``December 31, 2009'' and inserting ``December 31, 2008''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 408A(d)(3)(A)(iii) of the Internal Revenue Code 
        of 1986 is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``2010'' and inserting ``2009'', 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``2011'' and inserting ``2010''.
            (2) Section 408A(d)(3)(E)(i)(I) of such Code is amended by 
        striking ``2010'' and inserting ``2009''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          46,436
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  347,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,240
<INVENTORY>                                    355,727
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         116,338
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,099,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        478,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           359
<OTHER-SE>                                     294,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,099,814
<SALES>                                        326,550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               401,932
<CGS>                                           81,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  231,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,122
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,242
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,018
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21319]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 30, 2017.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (William Spaniel, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521. Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#20634f4d4d454e54530e4150504c49434154494f4e53605048494c0e4652420e4f5247"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="296a4644444c475d5a0748595945404a485d4046475a6959414045074f5b4b07465b4e">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Lawrence Keister & Company, Scottsdale, Pennsylvania; to acquire 
additional voting shares of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Mid Penn Bank, both in Millersburg, 
Pennsylvania.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 29, 
2017.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-21319 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
  

					
		  		  	 December 9, 2014

			
	 Mr. Robert D. Shallish, Jr.

4375 Olympus Heights

Syracuse, New York 13215
	  		  	

  

	 	Re:	Retirement 

 Dear Rob: 

This letter sets forth the understanding between you and CONMED Corporation regarding your retirement on March 31, 2015 (your
“Retirement Date”). 
  

	 	(a)	The Company waives your commitment to stay through June 30, 2015 as contemplated by the letter agreement dated July 23, 2014 and agrees to pay you a lump sum of $333,086.96, subject to normal withholdings,
within ten (10) days of your Retirement Date; 

  

	 	(b)	The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors, have agreed that any outstanding, unvested equity awards held by you as of your Retirement Date shall accelerate and remain exercisable
for one (1) year. 

  

	 	(c)	The Company will also pay you any amount that you may earn for the year-ended December 31, 2014 under the terms of the 2014 Executive Bonus Plan at the time when other similarly situated executives receive such
payments but in no event later than March 15, 2015. 

  

	 	(d)	Pursuant to the terms of the 2014 Executive Bonus Plan, the Company will pay you the 20% “holdback” from the 2013 Bonus Plan at the time when other similarly situated executives receive such holdback payments
but in no event later than March 15, 2015, provided that 2014 adjusted EPS is not less than $1.66. 

 Please let
me know if you have any questions or concerns. 
 Very truly yours, 

CONMED CORPORATION 

/s/ Heather L. Cohen 

Heather L. Cohen 

Executive Vice President – HR 
  

	cc:	Curt Hartman, President & CEO 

 Dirk Kuyper, Chairman of Compensation Committee 

Daniel S. Jonas, Esq, EVP & General Counsel
#### Robert Mack et al., Respondents, v Ford Motor Company, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[666 NYS2d 864]

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Matter of Kolasz v Levitt,*63 AD2d 777, 779). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mahoney, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Michael H. Sussman, on Behalf of Robert Watson, Petitioner, v Dutchess County District Attorney, Respondent.

[861 NYS2d 597]

Writ of habeas corpus to restore Robert Watson, the defendant in a criminal action entitled *People v Robert Watson*pending in the County Court, Dutchess County, under indictment No. 125/06, to the original conditions of his release on bail.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the County Court, Dutchess County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” *(People ex rel. Klein v Krueger,*25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; *see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson,*48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Rivera, J.P., Miller, Covello and Belen, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-17-047]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date:  October 13, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.

Place:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status:  Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 
1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1186 and 1187 (Review) (Stilbenic Optical 
Brightening Agent from China and Taiwan). The Commission is currently 
scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the 
Commission by October 27, 2017.
5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 4, 2017.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-21764 Filed 10-4-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P