alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Elton Alderman, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Prolong International Corporation (the Company), and Nicolaas M. Rosier, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d); and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                            
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Elton Alderman                         
|                         |  | Elton Alderman, Chairman, President        
|                         |  | and Chief Executive Officer                
|                         |  | (Principal Executive Officer)              
|                         | 
|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Nicolaas M. Rosier                     
|                         |  | Nicolaas M. Rosier, Chief Financial Officer
|                         |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan ROMERO-CAMACHO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10908

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 12, 2011.

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern Dis*472trict of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, David E. Sloan, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, SMITH and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Romero-Camacho pleaded guilty to unlawful reentry and was sentenced to 37 months in prison, at the bottom of the advisory guidelines range of 37 to 46 months. On appeal, he argues that the district court gave inadequate reasons for rejecting his nonfrivolous arguments for a sentence below the guidelines range. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

As a threshold matter, we conclude that Romero-Camacho’s general objection to procedural and substantive reasonableness, which was tied specifically to the grounds he raised for a nonguidelines variance, did not preserve his specific challenge to the adequacy of the district court’s reasons for the sentence. *See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d*357, 361 (5th Cir.2009). Thus, we review only for plain error. *See id.*

To demonstrate reversible plain error, Romero-Camacho must identify an error that is clear or obvious and that affects substantial rights. *See id.; Puckett v. United States, 556*U.S. 129, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 1429, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009). Even if he makes that showing, this court will not exercise its discretion to correct the error unless it “seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” *Mondragon-Santiago,*564 F.3d at 361 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Prior to imposing sentence, the district court had Romero-Camacho’s sentencing memorandum and the presentence report before it. Further, the court heard Romero-Camacho’s arguments for a sentence below the range as well as the Government’s counter-arguments. The court then imposed a sentence at the bottom of the range, stating that the sentence adequately addressed the objectives of punishment and deterrence. Although the court could have given more explanation, we cannot say that its reasons were insufficient in light of the record. *See Rita v. United States,*551 U.S. 338, 358-59, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); *United States v. Rodriguez,*523 F.3d 519, 525-26 (5th Cir.2008). There was no error, and certainly no clear or obvious error. Further, Romero-Camacho has not demonstrated that the lack of additional reasons affected his substantial rights, that is, he has not shown that further explanation would have resulted in a lesser sentence. *See Mondragon-Santiago,*564 F.3d at 364-65.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128399 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 128399 COA: 259724 Macomb CC: 03-001401-FH ROBERT BELL HUNTER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 10,

2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l 0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk
Order entered February 13, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00071-CV

LUCIEN B. CROSLAND, Appellant

V.

RODNEY J. ROHRICH, M.D., Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-06381

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 12, 2015, unopposed motion for extension of 

time to file appellant’s brief. Appellant asks this Court to extend his filing deadline for thirty 

days. Because this case is accelerated, we GRANT the motion to the extent we allow appellant 

an additional twenty days to file his brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We ORDER appellant file

his brief no later than March 17, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Altair  Nanotechnologies  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Rudi E. Moerck, President of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Rudi E. Moerck
--------------------
Rudi E. Moerck
President
May 14, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Fifth Drone Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation.

ACTION: Fifth DAC meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
Fifth DAC Meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on November 8, 2017, 9:00 a.m.-4:30 
p.m. PST.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Amazon Meeting Center, 2031 
7th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98121.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al Secen at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f6978593959398b684829597d8998491"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2f4e5c4a4c4a416f5d5b4c4e01405d48">[email protected]</span></a> or 202-
330-0647, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, 
Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at 202-833-9339, fax at 202-833-
9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given of the Fifth DAC Meeting. The DAC is a component of RTCA, 
which is a Federal Advisory Committee. The agenda will likely include, 
but may not be limited to, the following:

Wednesday, November 8, 2017

<bullet> Official Statement of the Designated Federal Officer
<bullet> Welcome and Introductions
<bullet> Review of the Fourth DAC Meeting
<bullet> Approval of Minutes from the Fourth DAC Meeting
<bullet> Report from the DAC Chairman
<bullet> Update from the FAA
<bullet> Report from the DAC Subcommittee (SC) Co-Chairs
<bullet> Reports from the Co-Chairs of the DACSC Task Groups (TGs)
<bullet> Discussion of Reports from the Co-Chairs of the DACSC TGs
<bullet> Report from MITRE
<bullet> New Assignments/Agenda Topics/Other
<bullet> Closing Remarks
<bullet> Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public. With the approval of 
the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the 
meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information 
should contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 2, 2017.
Christopher W. Harm,
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Stakeholder and Committee Liaison, AUS-
10, UAS Integration Office, FAA.
[FR Doc. 2017-21694 Filed 10-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
(June 26, 2008)

#### Allison L. Wey, Respondent-Appellant, v The New York Stock Exchange, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents. Allison *413L. Wey, Appellant, v The New York Stock Exchange, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[859 NYS2d 370]

Cross appeals from an order, Cross Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Edward Ramos, J.), entered April 16, 2007, and order, same court and Justice, entered November 13, 2007, unanimously withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the stipulation of the parties hereto. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Friedman, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ. *[See*15 Misc 3d 1127(A), 2007 NY Slip Op 50880(U).]
Exhibit 32.2.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David M. Young, Chief Financial Officer of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended April 1, 2012 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and




2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:
May 31, 2012
By:
/s/ David M. Young.David M. Young








The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                               
<ARTICLE>                                           5
                                                     
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                        dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                                        744,132
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               9,786,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            140,096,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               0
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 66,322,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              140,096,180
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           36,149,061
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           28,783,059
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               97,528
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          6,557,551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               710,923
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           710,923
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  710,923
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0
        
 

</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                              L Q CORPORATION, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of L Q Corporation, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
J. Fox, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated: November 14, 2005


                                 /s/ William J. Fox
                                 ------------------
                                 William J. Fox
                                 Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.01
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
  I, Gary Herman, Chief Executive Officer of Digital Creative Development Corporation., certify that:
  1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 of Digital Creative Development Corporation.
  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13-a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)  Not applicable (X-13)
  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (d)  Disclosed in the report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employe have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
   Date: June 28, 2011
/s/ Gary HermanGary HermanPresident
* Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Albert J. Henderson has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c). United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 94-6400. JEFFERSON COUNTY, A political subdivision of the State of Alabama, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. William W. ACKER, Jr., Defendant-Appellee. JEFFERSON COUNTY, A political subdivision of the State of Alabama, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. U.W. CLEMON, Defendant-Appellee. Jan. 12, 1996. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Nos. CV-93-M-69-5 and CV-93-M-196-5), Charles A. Moye, Jr., Judge. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion August 21, 1995, 11th Cir., 1995, 61 F.3d 848) Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. *
BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active servi ce having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
----

Exhibit 15.3 

CONSENT OF WILLIAM L. ROSE, P.E.

The undersigned,William L. Rose, hereby states as follows: 

I participated inthe preparation of reserve and resource estimates in connection with thepreparation and issuance of a technical report in May 2006 as updated in March2007 (collectively, the "Technical Reports") by WLR Consulting, Inc., concerningthe Cerro San Pedro Mine, for Metallica Resources Inc. (the "Company"), portionsof which are summarized under the caption "Item 4. Information on the Company –D. Property, Plant and Equipment – The Cerro San Pedro Project, Mexico" in thisAnnual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007(the "Form 20-F"), to be filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission. 

I hereby consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.333-36154 (as amended by Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 thereto) and No.333-148255) of the Company of the summary information concerning the TechnicalReports, including the references to my name included with such information, asset forth above in the Form 20-F. 

/s/ William L. Rose                  William L. Rose 

Date: March 25, 2008 

----
### eM&MXi^-L 

# •tfr<Z p/9*/iP-fi'iy> Rf&-£</&\.J%-£afy'&£-£*'' "1/fM f/^C'U Ttf&, ,^n££Em^22i3io^ML^B^ ^aTQ^GRf^ffN7%L~APPEALS
7^;L 7 ?~> , o go 52 33 /l> 0 M//Isn't/? 5 '•
Dismissed and Opinion Filed January 15, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00728-CV

KATHERINE MITCHELL, Appellant

V.

DALLAS HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-03179-E

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Molberg

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated November 15, 2019, we 

notified appellant the time for filing appellant’s brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a 

brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief 

and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To 

date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the 

Court regarding the status of this appeal.
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

190728f.p05

/Robert D. Burns, III//

ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

KATHERINE MITCHELL, Appellant

No. 05-19-00728-CV V.

DALLAS HOUSING AUTHORITY, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 5, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-03179-E.

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. 

Justices Whitehill and Molberg 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 15th day of January, 2020.