DISMISS; Opinion Filed April 4, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00096
- CR No. 05
- 19
- 00097
- CR RUDY LOPEZ , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F93
- 39883
- R & F91
- 44984
- R 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Osborne, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Myers Rudy Lopez appeals his convictions for se xual assault of a child and aggravated sexual assault of a child younger than 14 years of age. On January 2 3 , 2019, appellant ’s pro se notice of appeal was filed with this Court, stating he was appealing the trial court’s refusal to take action on his m otion for judgment nunc pro tunc filed with both case numbers listed

. After reviewing the notice of appeal, we notified appellant and the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office that we had concerns regarding our jurisdiction and requested a letter brief from each. Appellant responded, arguing that the Court has jurisdiction over appeals of denials of motions for judgment nunc pro tunc. An appellate court has jurisdiction to determine an appeal only if the appeal is authorized by law. Abbott v. State , 2 71 S.W.3d 694, 696

– 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) . When the appellate court’s jurisdiction is not legally invoked, the court’s power to act is as absent as if it did not exist.– 2

–

Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Appellate courts may consider criminal appeals only after final conviction or the entry of a narrow set of appealable interlocutory orders. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 26.2(a)(1); Wright v. State , 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1998, no pet.).
T he clerk’s records in these appeals show appellant filed a motion for judgment nunc pro
tunc on January 4, 2019. E ighteen days later, he filed his notice of appeal , stating he was appealing the denial of his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. Our review of t he clerk’s record s shows there has been no ruling on appellant’s January 4, 2019 motions. Because t here is no written order, we conclude we lack jurisdiction. See Nikrasch v. State , 698 S.W. 2 d 443, 450 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1985, no pet.) ( court of appeals has no jurisdiction over appeal absent written judgment or order )

. We dismiss th ese appeal s .

Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b) 190096F.U05 /Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
RUDY LOPEZ, Appellant No. 05

- 19

- 00096

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F93

- 39883

- R. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Osborne and Nowell participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
Judgment entered this 4 th day of April, 2019.– 4

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
RUDY LOPEZ, Appellant No. 05

- 19

- 00097

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F91

- 44984

- R. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Osborne and Nowell participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
Judgment entered this 4 th day of April, 2019.