alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

     KNOW ALL MEN by these presents that each of the undersigned does hereby
make, constitute and appoint William R. James and Daniel K. Shoemaker and each
of them, the true and lawful attorney-in-fact of the undersigned, with full
power of substitution and revocation, for and in the name, place and stead of
the undersigned, to execute and deliver the Annual Report on Form 10-K of James
Cable Partners, L.P. and James Cable Finance Corp. for the year ended December
31, 2001, and any and all amendments thereto; such Form 10-K and each such
amendment to be in such form and to contain such terms and provisions as said
attorney or substitute shall deem necessary or desirable; giving and granting
unto said attorney, or to such person or persons as in any case may be appointed
pursuant to the power of substitution herein given, full power and authority to
do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite, necessary or,
in the opinion of said attorney or substitute, able to be done in and about the
premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or
could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney for such substitute shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this instrument as of
the 27 day of March, 2002.


     /s/  William R. James
     --------------------------
     William R. James



     /s/ Daniel K. Shoemaker
     --------------------------
       Daniel K. Shoemaker
#### Heather Doe, Appellant, v Board of Education of Longwood Central Schools et al., Respondents.

[860 NYS2d 213]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mayer, J.), entered July 5, 2007, which denied her motion for an extension of time to file a note of issue, granted the defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute pursuant to CFLR 3216, and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

At the time the defendant served a 90-day notice pursuant to CFLR 3216, nearly 11 years had passed since the events that gave rise to the complaint, and the plaintiff had failed to respond to the defendants’ demands for a bill of particulars and discovery for nearly six years. Since the plaintiff failed to demonstrate “good cause” for this lack of activity, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs motion for an extension of time to file the note of issue and in granting the defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint *(see Harrington v Toback,*34 AD3d 640, 641 [2006]; *Florestal v Little Flower Children’s Servs. of N.Y.,*9 AD3d 348 [2004]; *Dhaliwal v Long Boat Taxi,*305 AD2d 449 [2003]). Spolzino, J.P, Ritter, Dillon, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

 

|   | The following is a list of all subsidiaries of the Registrant. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   |   |            |
|--------|--------|-----------------|
|        |   | Jurisdiction of |

|        | Name       | Incorporation |
|--------|------------|---------------|
|        |            |               |
|   | Cecil Bank | Maryland      |

|   | Cecil Bancorp Capital Trust I | Delaware |
|--------|-------------------------------|----------|

|   | Cecil Bancorp Capital Trust II | Delaware |
|--------|--------------------------------|----------|

|   | Cecil Financial Services Corporation | Maryland |
|--------|--------------------------------------|----------|

|   | Cecil Properties, Inc. | Maryland |
|--------|------------------------|----------|

|   | 3106 Emmorton Road, LLC (99%) | Maryland |
|--------|-------------------------------|----------|

|   | 1223 Turkey Point Road, LLC (99%) | Maryland |
|--------|-----------------------------------|----------|

|   | Subsidiaries of Cecil Bank: |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | Cecil Service Corporation | Maryland |
|--------|---------------------------|----------|

|   | Cecil Ventures, LLC | Maryland |
|--------|---------------------|----------|

|   | Subsidiaries of Cecil Properties, Inc.: |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|

|   | 3106 Emmorton Road, LLC (1%) | Maryland |
|--------|------------------------------|----------|

|   | 1223 Turkey Point Road, LLC (1%) | Maryland |
|--------|----------------------------------|----------|
**Exhibit 99**
**Written Statement of Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer****Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
     The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer andthe Chief Financial Officer of LCC International, Inc. (the“Company”), each hereby certifies that, to hisknowledge on the date hereof:
     (a) the Form 10-Q of the Company forthe Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2002, filed on thedate hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and
     (b) information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ C. THOMAS FAULDERS, III      C. Thomas Faulders, III     Chief Executive Officer     November x, 2002      /s/ DAVID N. WALKER      David N. Walker     Chief Financial Officer     November x, 2002
1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and r ecommendations of the Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3243

___________ James R. Mickelson, Suing as James * Roy Mickelson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Warden Carol Holinka, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 30, 2008 Filed: May 5, 2008

___________ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. James R. Mickelson appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and related motion cha llenging the Bureau of Prisons’ denial of his requests for immediate halfway-house placement. We dismiss the appeal as moot, because Mickelson was transferred to a ha lfway house on April 15, 2008. See Calderon v. Moore , 518 U.S. 149, 150 (1996) (per curiam) (when event occurs during pendency-2- of appeal that renders it impossible for c ourt--if it should decide case in appellant’s favor--to grant effective relief, court will dismiss appeal as moot). We also decline to address Mickelson’s new claims on appeal, see Poolman v. City of Grafton , 487 F.3d 1098, 1101 (8th Cir. 2007), and we deny the pending motions.

______________________________
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Fallini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/  John FalliniJohn Fallini, Chief Financial Officer

May 10, 2010
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James MASSARO, Defendant, Appellant.

No. 10-1015.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

May 11, 2011.

Joseph H. Zwicker, with whom James W. Evans, Nellie E. Staley, and Choate Hall & Stewart LLP were on brief, for appellant.

Mark T. Quinlivan, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Carmen M. Ortiz, United States Attorney, was on brief, for appellee.

Before LIPEZ, Circuit Judge, SOUTER, Associate Justice,* and SELYA, Circuit Judge.

*

 The Hon. David H. Souter, Associate Justice (Ret.) of the Supreme Court of the United states, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

In this sentencing appeal, appellant James Massaro argues, inter alia, that the district court erroneously classified his two prior Massachusetts convictions for assault and battery as predicate “violent felonies]” for the purpose of imposing a mandatory minimum sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. *See*18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Given our recent decision in *United States v. Holloway,*630 F.3d 252 (1st Cir.2011), *reh’g denied,*Nos. 08-2273, 09-1232 (1st Cir. Apr. 28, 2011), we vacate Massaro’s sentence and remand for further proceedings.

*So ordered.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
R. Bovee, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ David R. Bovee
    --------------
David R. Bovee
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
August 6, 2004
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT (99)(d)       CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF JAMES
                      CABLE FINANCE CORP. PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of James
Cable Finance Corp. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: March 28, 2003                      /s/ Daniel K. Shoemaker
                                           -----------------------
                                           Daniel K. Shoemaker
                                           Treasurer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)

The foregoing certification accompanies the filing and is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.





                                      -52-
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                     As adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
                         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter ended
March 31, 2007 of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), E. Gerald
Kay, the Chief Executive Officer of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. certifies,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to his knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
         78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
         material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: May 9, 2007

                                  By: /s/ E. Gerald Kay
                                  ---------------------
                                  E. Gerald Kay
                                  Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1

                WILSONS THE LEATHER EXPERTS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        THREE MONTHS  THREE MONTHS
                                                           ENDED         ENDED
                                                         OCTOBER 30,   OCTOBER 31,
                                                           1999           1998
                                                        ------------  ------------
<S>                                                     <C>           <C>
Net income (loss)                                         $    141     $ (1,990)
                                                          ========     ========

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic          10,995       10,826


Effect of options granted (1)                                  532         --
Effect of warrant (1)                                           42         --
                                                          --------     --------

Weighted average common shares outstanding - assuming
 dilution                                                   11,569       10,826
                                                          ========     ========

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share      $   0.01     $  (0.18)
                                                          ========     ========



                                                         NINE MONTHS    NINE MONTHS
                                                           ENDED           ENDED
                                                         OCTOBER 30,    OCTOBER 31,
                                                            1999            1998
                                                         -----------    -----------

Net loss                                                   $(15,776)     $(18,405)
                                                           ========      ========

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic           10,902        10,199


Effect of options granted (1)                                  --            --
Effect of warrant (1)                                          --            --
                                                           --------      --------

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and
diluted                                                      10,902        10,199
                                                           ========      ========

Basic and diluted net loss per common share (1)            $  (1.45)     $  (1.80)
                                                           ========      ========

</TABLE>

Note 1: Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128 "Earnings per
        Share," common stock equivalents are excluded when computing diluted net
        income or loss per common share if the effect is anti-dilutive.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50684 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RENE OSVALDO CONTRERAS-GRANADOS, also known as Juan Carlos Diaz-Fierro, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-68-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rene Osvaldo Contreras-Granados raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GOLDEN BEAR
GOLF, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                             2,280,069
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      1,121,880
<ALLOWANCES>                        (256,644)
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   3,430,277
<PP&E>                             1,899,114
<DEPRECIATION>                    (1,323,726)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     4,830,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            (19,091,379)
<BONDS>                           (2,663,070)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                             (55,050)
<OTHER-SE>                        16,863,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      (4,830,030)
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  (6,672,650)
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      6,774,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     (36,368)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      17,834
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    13,094
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       28,015
<INCOME-TAX>                          90,973
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  118,988
<DISCONTINUED>                      (201,235)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         (82,247)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.01)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2877 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2877

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 14, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 76 Brookside Avenue in Chester, New York, as the ``1st Lieutenant 
                       Louis Allen Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1ST LIEUTENANT LOUIS ALLEN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 76 Brookside Avenue in Chester, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``1st Lieutenant Louis Allen Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``1st 
Lieutenant Louis Allen Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 13, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Rodriguez, Appellant.

[859 NYS2d 428]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered May 23, 2007, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The People met their burden of establishing a valid consent *260search. The court had the unique opportunity to see and hear the witnesses, and there is no basis for disturbing its credibility determinations *(see People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]).

After proceedings at which defendant was represented by new counsel, the court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea *(see People v Frederick,*45 NY2d 520 [1978]). During his plea allocution, defendant acknowledged that he understood the terms of his plea, understood that any decision on parole would be left up to the parole authorities, and acknowledged that, aside from certain promises enumerated on the record, no other promise had induced his plea. As a result, defendant was not entitled to withdraw his plea on the basis of his uncorroborated assertion that his prior attorney had misinformed him he would actually be granted parole upon the expiration of his minimum term *(see People v Avery,*18 AD3d 244 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 825 [2005]). Concur—Saxe, J.P, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.