alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2802 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 305
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2802

                          [Report No. 111-155]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2009

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                             March 2, 2010

              Reported by Mr. Bingaman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for an extension of the legislative authority of the Adams 
   Memorial Foundation to establish a commemorative work in honor of 
  former President John Adams and his legacy, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY FOR MEMORIAL 
              ESTABLISHMENT.

    (a) Legislative Authority.--Section 1(c) of Public Law 107-62 is 
amended by striking ``accordance with'' and all that follows through 
the period at the end and inserting the following: ``accordance with 
chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, except that any reference 
in section 8903(e) of that chapter to the expiration at the end of or 
extension beyond a seven-year period shall be considered to be a 
reference to an expiration on or extension beyond December 2, 2013.''.
    (b) Technical Amendments.--Public Law 107-62 is amended--
            (1) in section 1(e), by striking ``(40 U.S.C. 1001, et 
        seq.)'' and inserting ``(40 U.S.C. 8901 et seq.)''; and
            (2) in section 2, by striking ``(40 U.S.C. 1002)'' and 
        inserting ``(40 U.S.C. 8902(a))''.
                                                       Calendar No. 305

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2802

                          [Report No. 111-155]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide for an extension of the legislative authority of the Adams 
   Memorial Foundation to establish a commemorative work in honor of 
  former President John Adams and his legacy, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 2, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Kevin Bryan Farrar, Appellant

No. 06

- 16

- 00021

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 188th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 40514

- A ).

Memorandum Opinion delivered by J ustice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant, Kevin Bryan Farrar, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 17, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Elisa WENAS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71287.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*586Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 17, 2011.

Joubin Nasseri, Nasseri Law Group, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Jesse Lloyd Busen, Trial Attorney, Oil, James Arthur Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Elisa Wenas, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for-asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Wakkary v. Holder,*558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009), and we deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Wenas established changed *587or extraordinary circumstances to excuse the delay in filing his asylum application beyond the one-year deadline. *See*8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.4(a)(4), (5); *Ramadan v. Gonzales,*479 F.3d 646, 656-58 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam). Accordingly, we deny the petition as to Wenas’ asylum claim.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Wenas did not suffer past persecution based on the two discriminatory incidents he experienced in Indonesia. *See Wakkary,*558 F.3d at 1059-60 (being beaten by youths, robbed of sandals and pocket money, and accosted by a threatening mob did not compel a past persecution finding). Thus, contrary to Wenas’ contention, he is not entitled to a presumption of future fear. *See Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir.2003). Further, the record does not compel the conclusion that Wenas demonstrated a clear probability of future persecution in Indonesia. *See Ramadan,*479 F.3d at 658; *Nagoulko,*333 F.3d at 1018 (possibility of future persecution too speculative). Accordingly, Wenas’ withholding of removal claim fails.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Wenas did not establish a likelihood of torture by, at the instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity in Indonesia. *See Arteaga v. Mukasey,*511 F.3d 940, 948-949 (9th Cir.2007).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
EX10.51_AMATAmend#5toEDCP


Exhibit 10.51






AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
2005 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., having adopted the Applied Materials, Inc. 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), effective as of January 1, 2005, and having amended and restated the Plan effective as of July 11, 2007, and having further amended the Plan on four subsequent occasions, hereby further amends the Plan, effective as of October 1, 2014, as follows:
1.    A new paragraph is added to Plan immediately preceding “Section 1 – Definitions” (with the new paragraph thereby becoming the third paragraph in the introduction to the Plan) to read as follows:
“Effective as of October 1, 2014, and notwithstanding any contrary provision of the Plan, no new elections to make Compensation Deferrals under the Plan will be accepted.”
2.    A new Section 2.1.9 is added to the Plan to read as follows:
“2.1.9  Suspension of New Elections.  Effective as of October 1, 2014, and notwithstanding any contrary provision of the Plan, no new elections to make Compensation Deferrals under the Plan will be accepted.”
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Applied Materials, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has executed this Amendment No. 5 to the restated Plan effective as of the dates specified above.
		
	Date:   October 16, 2014
	APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.


            
By /s/ Greg Lawler________________________
Greg Lawler,    
Corporate Vice President, Global Rewards
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Larry G. Gerdes, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Transcend Services, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

Date: March 8, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Polymer Group, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Veronica M. Hagen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  |  |    
|Date: March 30, 2012 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/ VERONICA M. HAGEN  
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Veronica M. Hagen      
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                      CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susquehanna
Media Co. (the "Company") for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John L.
Finlayson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ John L. Finlayson
-----------------------
John L. Finlayson
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryle EVANS, a.k.a. Quick, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-13707

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 7, 2011.

Patricia D. Barksdale, Andrew Tysen Duva, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Jacksonville, FL, A. Brian Albritton, David Paul Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Susan Good Yazgi, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HULL, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Susan G. Yazgi, appointed counsel for Darryle Evans, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Evans’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,725,430
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       6,211,760
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,125,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,955,103
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       6,275,725
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         6,276,893
<LOANS>                                     74,545,912
<ALLOWANCE>                                    402,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             101,224,415
<DEPOSITS>                                  87,674,802
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,750,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            629,204
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,065
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,111,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             101,224,415
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,549,552
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              716,814
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               334,969
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,601,335
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,002,772
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,110,725
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,490,610
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             520,765
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,923,572
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                997,803
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     997,803
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   504,543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.77
<LOANS-NON>                                    359,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   204,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               353,541
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   76,324
<RECOVERIES>                                    35,092
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              402,309
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           402,309
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32


                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification

         I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that the accompanying Form 10-KSB of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. ("Bancorp") for
the annual period ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Bancorp.


By: /s/ Mary B. Halsey                                            March 30, 2004
    ------------------                                            --------------
    Mary B. Halsey                                                    Date
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE THE
ANNUAL REPORT ON 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THERIN.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000926331
<NAME> ALLEGRO NEW MEDIA
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       6,483,454
<SECURITIES>                                 6,328,180
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,443,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                   452,000
<INVENTORY>                                    713,856
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,752,859
<PP&E>                                         628,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                 177,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,253,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,577,667
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         61
<COMMON>                                         7,860
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,667,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               27,253,373
<SALES>                                      4,700,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,700,955
<CGS>                                        1,817,688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,817,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               501,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (26,961,166)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    78,201
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (27,039,367)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (27,039,367)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (7.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2933 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to clarify the circumstances under which the enhanced penalty provisions for subsequent 

convictions apply. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2009 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia (for himself and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to 

clarify the circumstances under which the enhanced penalty provisions for subsequent convictions apply. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Firearm Recidivist 

5 Sentencing Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO ENHANCED PENALTIES PROVI7 SIONS. 

8 Section 924(c) of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2933 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(C), by striking ‘‘In the 

2 case of a second or subsequent conviction under this 

3 subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘If a person is convicted 

4 under this subsection after a prior conviction under 

5 this subsection has become final’’; and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(6) The provisions of section 411 of the Con8 trolled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 851), other than 

9 subsections (a)(2) and (e) of such section, as in ef10 fect on the date of the enactment of this paragraph, 

11 shall apply to sentencing for convictions under this 

12 subsection in the same manner in which such provi13 sions apply to sentencing for offenses under part D 

14 of title II of such Act.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS