46764 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Notices 

1See Antidumping Duty Orders: Stainless Steel 

Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Italy, Malaysia, and 

the Philippines, 66 FR 11257 (February 23, 2001) 

(LTFV Orders). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 82 

FR 25599 (June 2, 2017) (Sunset Initiation). 

3For a full description of the scope of the orders, 

See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Orders on Stainless Steel 

Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Italy, Malaysia, and 

the Philippines,’’ dated concurrently with this 

notice (Decision Memorandum). 4 Id. 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 

78778 (November 9, 2016) (Initiation Notice). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Madeline Heeren, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–9179. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department published the 

antidumping duty orders on butt-weld 

fittings from Italy, Malaysia, and the 

Philippines on February 23, 2001.1 On 

June 2, 2017, pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), the Department initiated 

sunset reviews of the antidumping duty 

orders on butt-weld fittings from Italy, 

Malaysia, and the Philippines.2 On June 

16, 2017, the Department received a 

notice of intent to participate from Core 

Pipe Products, Inc.; Shaw Alloy Piping 

Products, Inc.; and Taylor Forge 

Stainless, Inc. (collectively, the 

Domestic Interested Parties), within the 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i). The Domestic 

Interested Parties are manufacturers of a 

domestic like product in the United 

States and, accordingly, are domestic 

interested parties pursuant to section 

771(9)(C) of the Act. 

On June 30, 2017, the Department 

received an adequate substantive 

response to the notice of initiation from 

Domestic Interested Parties within the 

30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did 

not receive any timely filed responses 

from the respondent interested parties, 

i.e., butt-weld fitting producers and 

exporters from Italy, Malaysia, and the 

Philippines. On the basis of the notices 

of intent to participate and adequate 

substantive responses filed by the 

Domestic Interested Parties, and the 

inadequate response from any 

respondent interested party, the 

Department conducted an expedited 

(120-day) sunset review of the order 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). 

Scope of the Orders 

The product covered by the Orders is 

butt-weld fittings from Italy, Malaysia, 

and the Philippines.3

Analysis of Comments Received 

The issues discussed in the Decision 

Memorandum are: (1) The likelihood of 

continuation or recurrence of dumping, 

and (2) the magnitude of the margins of 

dumping likely to prevail if these orders 

were revoked.4 Parties can find a 

complete discussion of all issues raised 

in this review, and the corresponding 

recommendations, in the Decision 

Memorandum, which is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit in room B8024 of the main 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the Internet at http://trade.gov/ 

enforcement/. The signed Decision 

Memorandum and electronic versions of 

the Decision Memorandum are identical 

in content. 

Final Results of Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the 

Department determines that revocation 

of the antidumping duty orders of buttweld pipe fittings from Italy, Malaysia, 

and the Philippines would likely to lead 

to a continuation or recurrence of 

dumping and that the magnitude of the 

dumping margins likely to prevail 

would be 26.59 percent for Italy, 7.51 

percent for Malaysia, and up to 33.81 

percent for the Philippines. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return of 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

The Department is issuing and 

publishing these final results and notice 

in accordance with sections 751(c), 

752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218. 

Dated: October 2, 2017. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2017–21590 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–843] 

Certain Lined Paper Products From 

India: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Preliminary Determination 

of No Shipments; 2015–2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to requests from 

interested parties, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) is 

conducting an administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

lined paper products (CLPP) from India, 

covering the period September 1, 2015, 

through August 31, 2016. This review 

covers two mandatory respondents, 

Navneet Education Ltd. (Navneet) and 

SAB International (SAB) and five nonselected companies. We preliminarily 

find that Navneet and SAB did not sell 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value (NV) during the period of review 

(POR). Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable October 6, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cindy Robinson or Sam Brummitt, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone 

(202) 482–3797 or (202) 482–7851, 

respectively. 

Background 

On November 9, 2016, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping order on lined paper from 

India.1 The Department initiated this 

administrative review covering the 

following nine companies: Kokuyo 

Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. 

(Kokuyo Riddhi), Lodha Offset Limited 

(Lodha), Magic International Pvt. Ltd. 

(Magic), Marisa International (Marisa), 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Notices 46765 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India: Extension of Time Limit for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2015–2016,’’ dated May 15, 

2017. 3See Memorandum, ‘‘2015–2016 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India: Verification of Sales 

Questionnaire Responses of SAB International’’ 

dated September 29, 2017 (SAB Sales Verification 

Report); see also Memorandum, ‘‘2015–2016 

Antidumping Administrative Review of Certain 

Lined Paper Products from India: Verification of 

Cost Questionnaire Responses of SAB 

International’’ dated September 29, 2017 (SAB Cost 

Verification Report). 

4See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from the People’s Republic of China; 

Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the 

People’s Republic of China; and Notice of 

Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 

(September 28, 2006) (CLPP Order). 

5For a complete description of the Scope of the 

Order, see Memorandum titled, ‘‘Decision 

Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain 

Lined Paper Products from India; 2015–2016,’’ 

dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

6See No Shipments Inquiry for certain lined 

paper products from India Produced and/or 

Exported by Lodha Offset and Marisa International 

(A–533–843), message number 6365302 (December 

30, 2016). 

7See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of 

Review, Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 

24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 

Determination of No Shipments, and Partial 

Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR, at 51306– 

51307 (August 28, 2014). 

8See SAB’s February 14, 2017 Section A 

Questionnaire Response (SAB February 14, 2017 

AQR), at 3–4 and Exhibit A–1. 

9 Id. 

10See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 18– 

22. 

11See Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United 

States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Albemarle). 

12 In these preliminary results, the Department 

applied the assessment rate calculation method 

adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation 

of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

Navneet, Pioneer Stationery Pvt Ltd. 

(Pioneer), SAB, SGM Paper Products, 

and Super Impex. 

On May 15, 2017, the Department 

extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results to October 2, 2017.2

From July 19, 2017, through July 28, 

2017, the Department conducted cost 

and sales verifications of SAB.3

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the CLPP 

Order 4 is certain lined paper products. 

The merchandise subject to this order is 

currently classified under the following 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 

4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 

4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, 

4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 

4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 

4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 

4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 

4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

product description remains 

dispositive.5

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Lodha and Marisa reported that they 

made no shipments of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR. To confirm Lodha’s and 

Marisa’s no shipment claims, the 

Department issued a no-shipment 

inquiry to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) requesting that it 

review Lodha’s and Marisa’s noshipment claims.6 CBP did not report 

that it had any information to contradict 

Lodha’s and Marisa’s claims of no 

shipments during the POR. 

Given that Lodha and Marisa certified 

that they made no shipments of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR, and there is no information 

calling their claims into question, we 

preliminarily determine that Lodha and 

Marisa did not have any reviewable 

transactions during the POR. Consistent 

with the Department’s practice, we will 

not rescind the review with respect to 

Lodha and Marisa but, rather, will 

complete the review and issue 

instructions to CBP based on the final 

results.7

Methodology 

The Department is conducting this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Constructed export 

price or export price is calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Normal value is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

preliminary results, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov and is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the internet at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html. The signed Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum and the 

electronic version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Calculation of Normal Value Based on 

Constructed Value (CV) 

SAB reported that it made no sales in 

the home market during the POR.8

Pursuant to 773(a)(1)(C)(i) of the Act, we 

examined SAB’s third country sales and 

have determined that such sales do not 

constitute a viable comparison market 

(CM) within the meaning of section 

773(a)(1)(B)(ii)(II) of the Act.9 Therefore, 

for these preliminary results, we relied 

on CV as the basis for calculating NV, 

in accordance with sections 773(a)(4) 

and (e) of the Act.10

Preliminary Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily calculated a dumping 

margin of zero percent for both Navneet 

and SAB. We are applying to the nonselected companies the rates calculated 

for the mandatory respondents in these 

preliminary results, as referenced 

below.11

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Navneet Education Ltd ............... 0.00 

SAB International ........................ 0.00 

Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products 

Pvt. Ltd .................................... 0.00 

Magic International Pvt. Ltd ........ 0.00 

Pioneer Stationery Pvt Ltd ......... 0.00 

SGM Paper Products ................. 0.00 

Super Impex ............................... 0.00 

Assessment Rate 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department shall determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. If the weighted-average 

dumping margin for Navneet or SAB is 

not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 

percent), we will calculate importerspecific ad valorem antidumping duty 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the importer’s examined sales to the 

total entered value of those same sales 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).12 We will instruct CBP to 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
46766 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Notices 

13See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO 

Panel in US—Zeroing (EC): Notice of 

Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay 

Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial 

Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, 

72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007). 

14See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

15See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

16See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

17See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

18See 19 CFR 351.310. 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review when the importer-specific 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this review is above de 

minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent). Where either 

the respondent’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is zero or de minimis, 

or an importer-specific assessment rate 

is zero or de minimis, we will instruct 

CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

The final results of this review shall be 

the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review where applicable. 

In accordance with the Department’s 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice, for 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR produced by each respondent 

for which it did not know that its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. 

We intend to issue instructions to 

CBP 15 days after publication of the 

final results of this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of final results 

of administrative review for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for respondents 

noted above will be the rates established 

in the final results of this administrative 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

producers or exporters not covered in 

this administrative review but covered 

in a prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation, but 

the producer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding for the producer of the 

subject merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other producers or 

exporters will continue to be 3.91 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the investigation as modified by the 

section 129 determination.13 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

The Department will disclose to 

parties to this proceeding the 

calculations performed in reaching the 

preliminary results within five days of 

the date of publication of these 

preliminary results.14 Pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties 

may submit case briefs not later than 30 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may be filed 

not later than five days after the date for 

filing case briefs.15 Parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are requested to submit with 

the argument: (1) A statement of the 

issue, (2) a brief summary of the 

argument, and (3) a table of 

authorities.16 All briefs must be filed 

electronically using ACCESS. An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

the Department’s electronic records 

system, ACCESS. 

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing must submit a written request 

to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, using 

Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS 

system within 30 days of publication of 

this notice.17 Requests should contain 

the party’s name, address, and 

telephone number, the number of 

participants, and a list of the issues to 

be discussed. If a request for a hearing 

is made, we will inform parties of the 

scheduled date for the hearing which 

will be held at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at 

a time and location to be determined.18

Parties should confirm by telephone the 

date, time, and location of the hearing. 

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the 

Department will issue the final results 

of this administrative review, including 

the results of our analysis of the issues 

raised by the parties in their case briefs, 

within 120 days after issuance of these 

preliminary results. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties and/or 

countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and increase the 

subsequent assessment of the 

antidumping duties. 

These preliminary results of review 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: October 2, 2017. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Extension of Preliminary Results 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. Discussion of Methodology 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments 

Date of Sale 

Product Comparisons 

Comparisons to Normal Value 

A. Determination of Comparison Method 

B. Results of the Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

Export Price 

Normal Value 

A. Home Market Viability 

B. Level of Trade 

Navneet 

SAB 

C. Sales to Affiliated Customers 

D. Cost of Production Analysis 

1. Calculation of COP 

2. Test of Comparison Market Prices and 

COP 

3. Results of COP Test 

E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on 

Comparison Market Prices 

F. Calculation of Normal Value Based on 

Constructed Value 

Margin for Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

Currency Conversion 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2017–21588 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES