alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1


                               TMI HOLDINGS, INC.
                       (FORMERLY THRIFT MANAGEMENT, INC.)

         EXHIBIT 11.1 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

         The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net
         (loss) per share:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Three Months Ended                     Nine Months Ended
                                                    --------------------------------------  --------------------------------------
                                                    September 29, 2002  September 30, 2001  September 29, 2002  September 30, 2001
                                                    ------------------  ------------------  ------------------  ------------------
<S>                                                 <C>                 <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Numerator:
  (Loss) before extraordinary gain                      $  (20,921)         $ (191,532)         $  (59,691)         $ (473,300)
  Extraordinary gain on debenture settlement                    --                  --                  --             408,552
                                                        ----------          ----------          ----------          ----------
  Net (loss)                                            $  (20,921)         $ (191,532)         $  (59,691)         $  (64,748)
                                                        ==========          ==========          ==========          ==========
Denominator:
  Denominator for basic (loss) per
  share--weighted-average shares                         3,463,877           3,047,210           3,255,544           2,987,210

  Effect of dilutive securities:
    Stock options                                               --                  --                  --                  --
                                                        ----------          ----------          ----------          ----------
  Denominator for diluted (loss) per share               3,463,877           3,047,210           3,255,544           2,987,210
                                                        ==========          ==========          ==========          ==========

Basic and diluted (loss) per share:
  (Loss) before extraordinary gain                      $    (0.01)         $    (0.06)         $    (0.02)         $    (0.16)

  Extraordinary gain on debenture settlement                    --                  --                  --                0.14
                                                        ----------          ----------          ----------          ----------
  Net (loss) per share                                  $    (0.01)         $    (0.06)         $    (0.02)         $    (0.02)
                                                        ==========          ==========          ==========          ==========
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., certify that:1*.*I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mitcham Industries, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting./s/ Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This is a 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Jun-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               Jul-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  Sep-28-1997
<CASH>                                         705,256
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  163,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                    277,846
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,414,811
<PP&E>                                       7,746,280
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,357,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,345,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,317,328
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                    577,200
<COMMON>                                       143,992
<OTHER-SE>                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,345,481
<SALES>                                      5,075,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,885,766
<CGS>                                        3,062,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,196,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,999
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (381,592)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (381,592)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (381,592)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph D. Ayer, Appellant.

[987 NYS2d 589]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell P Buscaglia, A.J.), rendered November 8, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminally negligent homicide.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Present — Scudder, PJ., Centra, Carni, Lindley and DeJoseph, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6680

KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Royal Blackness, a/k/a Bar None,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JON E. OZMINT; ROBERT E. WARD; JAMES E. SLIGH, JR.; JOHN LUNDEN; DAVID TATARSKI; BERNARD MCKIE; VAUGHN JACKSON; GARY LANE; CHARLES AMAKER; J. PECK; GLENN ALEWINE; WILLIAM LITRELL; NED COOPER; BRENT A. MILLS; LARRY KONG, of American Amenities, Incorporated in their official and individual capacity; AMERICAN AMENITIES INCORPORATED,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

ESTHER QUATTLEBAUM; DENNIS DUNLAP; J. C. BROWN; ROBERT ESPISITO; H. BOATMAN; VERONICA SMITH; DENISE CANNARELLA; BRETT, R.N.; AEDEC INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; MCMASTER; JOHN DOE,

Defendants.

No. 09-7540

KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Royal Blackness, a/k/a Bar None,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.JON OZMINT; ROBERT E. WARD; JAMES E. SLIGH, JR.; JOHN LUNDEN; DAVID TATARSKI; BERNARD MCKIE; VAUGHN JACKSON; GARY LANE; CHARLES AMAKER; J. PECK; GLENN ALEWINE; WILLIAM LITRELL; NED COOPER; H. BOATMAN; LARRY KONG, of American Amenities, Incorporated, in their official and individual capacity; AMERICAN AMENITIES, INCORPORATED,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

AEDEC INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; JOHN DOE; DENNIS DUNLAP; J. C. BROWN; ROBERT ESPISITO; DENISE CANNARELLA; BRETT, R.N., BRENT A. MILLS; HENRY MCMASTER,

Defendants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (9:07-cv-03644-PMD)

Submitted: November 24, 2009 Decided: December 14, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Smith, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Vinton D. Lide, Michael Stephen Pauley, LIDE & PAULEY, LLC, Lexington, South Carolina; Christopher R. Antley, DEVLIN & PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Kevin Smith, a/k/a Bar

None Royal Blackness, appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and

dismissing two Defendants because the Defendants were not state

actors and granting summary judgment to the remaining Defendants

and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons state d by the district court. See

Smith v. Ozmint , No. 9:07-cv-03644-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2009;

July 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Joseph E.K. Niagara County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Lithia K., Appellant.

[987 NYS2d 760]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Niagara County (John F. Batt, J.), entered October 26, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order, among other things, placed the subject child in the custody of petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, respondent mother contends that her admission of neglect was involuntarily entered because she stated during the colloquy that she would do or say anything to get her child back. Because the mother “did not move to vacate or withdraw her admission” in Family Court, however, she failed to preserve for our review her challenge to the voluntariness of her admission *(Matter of Michael B.,*256 AD2d 1208, 1209 [1998]; *see Matter of Cora J. [Kenneth J.],*72 AD3d 1170, 1171 [2010]; *Matter of Nasir H.,*251 AD2d 1010, 1010 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 809 [1998]). We note in any event that, before accepting the mother’s admission, the court made clear that it did not want her to admit to something that was not true, and that the mother thereafter admitted to the facts underlying the neglect petition.

The mother further contends that the court, in removing the child from her custody following the temporary removal hearing, improperly relied on evidence of her past conduct regarding an older child. That contention has been rendered moot by the court’s subsequent finding of neglect *(see Matter of Mary YY. [Albert YY.],*98 AD3d 1198, 1198 [2012]), and the dispositional order *(see Matter of John S.,*26 AD3d 870, 870 [2006]).

Present—Scudder, EJ, Fahey, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS Initial Review Group Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research Committee.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS Initial Review Group; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research Committee.                    

*Date:*                         October 30-31, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Frank S. De Silva, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, Room #3E72A, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC 9834, Bethesda, MD 20892934, (240) 669-5023,                         *fdesilva@niaid.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 28, 2017.

Natasha M. Copeland, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-21264 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2864 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2864

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act of 1998 to authorize 
 funds to acquire hydrographic data and provide hydrographic services 
  specific to the Arctic for safe navigation, delineating the United 
 States extended continental shelf, and the monitoring and description 
                          of coastal changes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 306 of the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act of 1998 
(33 U.S.C. 892d) is amended--
            (1) by inserting before the text the following: ``(a) In 
        General.--''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Arctic Programs.--Of the amount authorized for each of fiscal 
years 2011 and 2012--
            ``(1) $5,000,000 is authorized for use to acquire 
        hydrographic data, provide hydrographic services, conduct 
        coastal change analyses necessary to ensure safe navigation, 
        and improve the management of coastal change in the Arctic; and
            ``(2) $2,000,000 is authorized for use to acquire 
        hydrographic data and provide hydrographic services in the 
        Arctic necessary to delineate the United States extended 
        Continental Shelf.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2864

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act of 1998 to authorize 
 funds to acquire hydrographic data and provide hydrographic services 
  specific to the Arctic for safe navigation, delineating the United 
 States extended continental shelf, and the monitoring and description 
                          of coastal changes.
```
1

Pardue has moved to supplement the record with an affidavit

never presented to the district court. In the affidavit, Pardue

asserts that his attorney had a conflict of interest by virtue of

her former marriage to a member of the family of the founder of

Wal-Mart. She had been divorced for over 10 years before she

represented Pardue. Pardue asserts that he only recently became

aware of this fact. The State of Arkansas opposes the motion to

___________

No. 95-2579

___________

David Preston Pardue, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Larry Norris, Director, *

Arkansas Department of * [PUBLISHED]

Correction, *

 *

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: January 9, 1996

 Filed: January 24, 1996 ___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

David Preston Pardue appeals the denial of his second 28

U.S.C. § 2254 petition for abuse of the writ. We affirm.

Pardue was convicted of robbery of a Wal-Mart store in 1987.

His conviction was affirmed on appeal. He filed his first petition

for habeas corpus relief in 1989, alleging newly discovered

evidence relating to eyewitness identification. In the present

petition, Pardue challenges the lawfulness of his arrest and

asserts ineffective assistance of counsel.1 
supplement the record, but nonetheless offers the affidavit of

Pardue's attorney. In that affidavit, she states that Pardue knew

of her relationship to the Walton family at the time of his first

habeas corpus petition. 

Pardue has shown no reason why these materials were not

presented to the district court, in spite of several opportunities

to present them--e.g., in response to a show cause order, or as

part of an objection to the magistrate's findings. Accordingly,

Pardue's motion to supplement the record is denied. We add that if

we were to consider the evidence, it would not change this outcome.

-2-

A second or successive petition for habeas corpus must be

dismissed as an abuse of the writ unless the petitioner can show

external cause and prejudice or a fundamental miscarriage of

justice. McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467. 493-94 (1991). Pardue

has not shown that he lacked a factual or legal basis to raise his

claims in the first petition or that anything else prevented him

from doing so. 

After consideration of Pardue's arguments on appeal, we affirm

for the reasons stated in the district court's well reasoned

opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Allied Security Innovations Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Anthony
Shupin, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of the operations of the
  Company.




By:
                /s/
      Anthony Shupin
 Anthony
      Shupin
 President,
      Chief Executive Officer:
      September 17,
2010