alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21789]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Computing and Communication 
Foundations; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Proposal Review Panel for Computing and 
Communication Foundations (#1192)--CSoI (Purdue University) Reverse 
Site Visit.
    Date and Time: November 29, 2017; 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.
    November 30, 2017; 9:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m.
    Place: Virginia Tech Research Center, 900 Glebe Road, Arlington, 
VA.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Person: Phillip Regalia, National Science Foundation, 2415 
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA, 22314; Telephone: (703) 292-8910.
    Purpose of Meeting: Site visit to assess the progress of the STC 
Award: CCF-0939370, ``Emerging Frontiers of Science of Information'', 
and to provide advice and recommendations concerning further support 
for the project.

Agenda

Wednesday, November 29, 2017; 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.

8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.: OPEN
    Presentations by Awardee Institution, faculty staff and students, 
to Site Team and NSF Staff. Discussions and question and answer 
sessions.

Thursday, November 30, 2017; 9:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m.

9:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m.: CLOSED
    Response and feedback to presentations by Site Team and NSF Staff. 
Discussions and question and answer sessions. Draft report on education 
and research activities. Complete written site visit report with 
preliminary recommendations.
    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed during closed portions 
of the site review include information of a proprietary or confidential 
nature, including technical information; financial data, such as 
salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the review. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) 
and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 4, 2017.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-21789 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**Exhibit 8.1**

 

**List of Main Subsidiaries**

 
| **Subsidiary**                                        | ** ** | **Jurisdiction** | ** ** | **Usual Name**           |
|-------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------|------------|--------------------------|
| Endesa  Inversiones Generales S.A.                    |       | Chile            |       | Enigesa                  |
| Empresa  de Ingeniería Ingendesa S.A.            |       | Chile            |       | Ingendesa                |
| Empresa  Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.                |       | Chile            |       | Pehuenche                |
| Empresa  Eléctrica Pangue S.A.                   |       | Chile            |       | Pangue                   |
| Hidroeléctrica  El Chocón S.A.              |       | Argentina        |       | El Chocón           |
| Endesa  Costanera S.A.                                |       | Argentina        |       | Endesa Costanera         |
| Sociedad  Concesionaria Túnel El Melón S.A. |       | Chile            |       | Túnel El Melón |
| Emgesa  S.A. E.S.P.                                   |       | Colombia         |       | Emgesa                   |
| Edegel  S.A.                                          |       | Peru             |       | Edegel                   |
| Compañía  Eléctrica San Isidro S.A.    |       | Chile            |       | San Isidro               |
| Compañía  Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A. |       | Chile            |       | Celta                    |
| Endesa  Eco S.A.                                      |       | Chile            |       | Endesa Eco               |
| Central  Eólica Canela S.A.                      |       | Chile            |       | Canela                   |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert B. Barnhill, Jr.,Chief Executive Officer of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated, (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

# 1.             The Annual Report on Form 10-Kof the Company for the period ended March 26, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

# 2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

| Date: June 19,  2006 |   | /s/ Robert B. Barnhill, Jr. |   |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Robert B. Barnhill, Jr.     |   |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Polymer Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year
ended January 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Veronica M. Hagen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date: March 22, 2010

/s/ VERONICA M. HAGEN Veronica M. Hagen Chief Executive Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated May 3, 2018, with respect to the financial statement of Smart Trust 380 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-223396) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


May 3, 2018
```

[United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions (Plum Book), 1996]
[Independent Agencies and Government Corporations]
[Merit Systems Protection Board]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

The Plum Book (United States Government Policy
        and Supporting Positions): 1996 EditionBRANCH: EXECUTIVE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARDLocationPosition TitleName of IncumbentPay PlanType of Appt.Level Grade or PayTenureExpires**OFFICE OF THE BOARD, CHAIRMAN***Office of the Chairman*Washington, DCChairmanBenjamin L. ErdreichEXPASIII..........03/01/2000Washington, DCChief of StaffAnita L. BolesESNA............................Washington, DCChief Counsel to the ChairmanSteven L. KatzESNA............................Washington, DCCounsel to the ChairmanWilliam B. WileyGSSC15..................*Office of General Counsel*Washington, DCGeneral CounselMary L. JenningsESCA............................*Office of Appeals Counsel*Washington, DCDirector, Office of Appeals CounselStephen E. AlpernESNA............................**OFFICE OF THE BOARD, VICE CHAIRMAN***Office of the Vice Chairman*Washington, DCVice ChairmanBeth S. SlavetEXPASIV..........03/01/2002Washington, DCChief Counsel to the Vice ChairmanElla B. ChatterjeeESNA............................Washington, DCCounsel to the Vice ChairmanAlexia F. McCaskillGSSC14..................Washington, DCCounsel to the Vice ChairmanMarilyn E. ParkGSSC14..................Washington, DCConfidential Assistant to the Vice ChairmanDonna D. NeedhamGSSC12..................**OFFICE OF THE BOARD, MEMBER***Office of the Member*Washington, DCMemberAntonio C. AmadorEXPASIV..........03/01/1997Washington, DCChief Counsel to the MemberVictor G. CabralSLNA............................Washington, DCCounsel to the MemberAlan O. ForstGSSC15..................Washington, DCExecutive Assistant to the MemberLuben MontoyaGSSC15..................Washington, DCConfidential Assistant to the MemberDeborah M. DaileyGSSC12..................
```
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Renhuang Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending October 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Zuoliang Wang, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a
review of the Report:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




/s/Zuoliang
      WangZuoliang
      WangInterim
      Chief Financial Officer
                  (Principle
      Financial Officer)




Dated:
December 8, 2009
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

June 22, 2012



### Before

F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK

, Chief Judge

J OEL M. F LAUM

, Circuit Judge

A NN C LAIRE W ILLIAMS

, Circuit Judge



### No

. 11

- 3876

J OHN C. J USTICE

, Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

T OWN OF C ICERO

, I LLINOIS and L ARRY D OMINICK

, Town President

, Defendants

- Appellees

. Appeal from the United

States District Court for the

Northern District of Illinois

, Eastern Division.

No. 10 C 5331 Matthew F. Kennelly

, Judge

.

Order

Our earlier opinion concluded that Justice’s notice of appeal was timely with respect to the district court’s order denying his motion for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60, but not with respect to the district court’s original decision dismissing the case. We directed Justice to file a memorandum exp laining what extraordinary circumstance, see Gonzalez v. Crosby , 545 U.S. 524 (2005), could support relief under Rule 60.

Justice has filed a memorandum, but he did not address that question. Instead he explained why he filed his post

- judgment motion more than 28 days after the district court’s decision. That subject is not relevant. The matter that 1

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 2No. 11

- 3876 Page 2

Justice needed to address was whether extraordinary circumstances required the district court to change its substantive decision dismissing the complaint.

As our earlier opinion explained, Justice filed and lost the same basic claim before; ordinary principles of preclusion doome d this successive suit. The district judge added that, even if recent legal developments permit new litigation, Justice still loses on the merits. 827 F. Supp. 2d 835 (N.D. Ill. 2011). The judge did not abuse his discretion in adhering to that decision in response to the request for reconsideration. Justice has not even attempted to explain to this court where the district judge erred, let alone what “extraordinary” circumstances justify reopening the judgment. The order of the district court denying the po st

- judgment motion for reconsideration therefore is

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                              L Q CORPORATION, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of L Q Corporation, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Melvyn Brunt,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: August 14, 2006

                                        /s/ Melvyn Brunt
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Melvyn Brunt
                                        Chief Financial Officer


                                       24
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not prec e dent except under the limited circumstances set fo rth in 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 2, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-10996

____________ AVIALL SERVICES INC., Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus COOPER INDUSTRIES INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CV-1926-D
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * This case is remanded to the district court fo r reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Atlantic Research Corp. , ___ U.S. ___, 2007 WL 1661465 (U.S. June 11, 2007) (No. 06-562).
---

Exhibit 99.13



CONSENT OF EXPERT
February 25, 2010
British Columbia Securities Commission
Alberta Securities Commission
Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission
Manitoba Securities Commission
Ontario Securities Commission
New Brunswick Securities Commission
Nova Scotia Securities Commission
Registrar of Securities, Prince Edward Island
Securities Commission of Newfoundland and Labrador
Registrar of Securities, Northwest Territories
Registrar of Securities, Nunavut
Registrar of Securities, Yukon
United States Securities and Exchange Commission Re:
     Annual Information Form dated February 25, 2010 (the Annual Information Form) of Minefinders Corporation Inc. (the Company).
  I refer to the report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Minable Reserve for the Dolores Gold-Silver Project, Chihuahua State, Mexico" dated March 25, 2008 (the "Report") as referenced in the Annual Information Form and documents incorporated by reference therein. This letter is being filed as my consent to the use of my name and the Report in the Annual Information Form and in documents incorporated by reference therein. I confirm that I have read the Annual Information Form and I have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations that are derived from the Report referred to above or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services I performed in connection with such Report. I consent to the filing of this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Companys Form 40-F dated February 25, 2010, and any amendment thereto, including post-effective amendments and as part of a post-effective amendment to the Companys Form F-10, to incorporate the Companys Form 40-F dated February 25, 2010. [Signature page follows] 5757 Central Ave Suite D Boulder, CO 80301 USA +1 (303) 443-2209 FAX +1 (303) 443-3156Mining Office: 274 Union Boulevard Suite 450 Lakewood, CO 80228 USA +1 (720) 407-4062 FAX +1 (720) 407-4067
http://www.gustavson.com      gustavson@gustavson.com


---

- 2 - Yours truly,/s/ William J. CrowlWilliam J. Crowl
February 25, 2010 5757 Central Ave Suite D Boulder, CO 80301 USA +1 (303) 443-2209 FAX +1 (303) 443-3156Mining Office: 274 Union Boulevard Suite 450 Lakewood, CO 80228 USA +1 (720) 407-4062 FAX +1 (720) 407-4067
http://www.gustavson.com      gustavson@gustavson.com


---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSRS Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endingSeptember 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas C.K. Yuen, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 10, 2005 |   |                     |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                    | By:    | /s/ Thomas C.K.  Yuen    |   |
|                    |   | Thomas C.K. Yuen         |
|                    |   | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Joyce SS., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Tioga County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Sue RR., Appellant.

[667 NYS2d 136]

Peters, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Tioga County (Callahan, Sr., J.), entered February 21, 1996, which, *inter alia,*granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, to hold respondent in violation of a prior order of disposition.

On January 11, 1996, Joyce SS., respondent’s daughter, was temporarily removed from respondent’s care without a court order *(see,*Family Ct Act § 1024) after Joyce disclosed to a caseworker various incidents which violated the terms and conditions imposed upon respondent in a prior neglect order dated July 3, 1995. On January 12, 1996, a violation petition was filed against respondent alleging violations of said order. On January 17, 1996 following a hearing held pursuant to Family Court Act § 1028 for the return of Joyce to respondent, Family Court determined that, based upon the evidence presented, Joyce should remain in petitioner’s custody.

Prior to the commencement of the fact-finding hearing, respondent admitted various allegations contained in the violation petition and stipulated to Joyce’s placement in petitioner’s custody for one year. In the instant appeal, respondent attempts to appeal from the order entered thereon, contending that Family Court erred in upholding the emergency removal without a court order. Inasmuch as a final order of disposition has been entered, any appeal from the temporary order of removal is moot *(see, e.g., Matter of Nicotera v Nicotera,*222 AD2d 892, 894; *Matter of Brozzo v Brozzo,*192 AD2d 878, 879). Since respondent both admitted to allegations in the petition and stipulated to her daughter’s placement in petitioner’s custody, without thereafter challenging the voluntariness thereof, she is not an aggrieved party and, therefore, has no right to appeal from the final order of disposition *(see generally, Zhagnay v Royal Realty Co.,*87 NY2d 954; *Dudley v Perkins,*235 NY 448, 457).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., *963concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Exhibit 99.1

Agreement Regarding Disclosure of Long-Term Debt Instruments

In reliance upon Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A), of Regulation S-K, AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the "Partnership"), has not
filed as an exhibit to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year period ended December 31, 2003, any instrument with respect to long-term debt not being
registered where the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed ten percent of the total assets of the Partnership and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Pursuant to Item
601(b)(4)(iii)(A), of Regulation S-K, the Partnership hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such agreement to the Securities Exchange Commission upon request.

| |  | AIMCO Properties, L.P.
| |  | ----------------------
| |  | By:                   
| |  | By:                   

---

QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Owen McAllister, Appellant.

[665 NYS2d 897]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.), rendered January 17, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of 7V2 to 15 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to the trial court’s *Sandoval*ruling is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law since he failed to raise any objection to the court’s ultimate ruling *185
      *(People v Venero,*211 AD2d 566, *lv denied*86 NY2d 785). Were we to review his claims, we would find that the ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion. Since the theft-related crimes in which defendant has specialized were highly relevant to credibility, defendant was not entitled to be shielded from impeachment *(People v Post, 235*AD2d 299, *lv denied*90 NY2d 862). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.