alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# AGENCY:

National Transportation Safety Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the National Transportation Safety Board, Performance Review Board (PRB).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Emily T. Carroll, Chief, Human Resources Division, Office of Administration, National Transportation Safety Board, 490 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20594-0001, (202) 314-6233.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314(c)(1) through (5) of Title 5, United States Code requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES Performance Review Boards. The board reviews and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor and considers recommendations to the appointing authority regarding the performance of the senior executive.

The following have been designated as members of the 2017 Performance Review Board of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB):

The Honorable Earl F. Weener; Member, National Transportation Safety Board, PRB Chair.

The Honorable T. Bella Dinh-Zarr, Member, National Transportation Safety Board.

Mr. Edward Benthall, Chief Financial Officer, National Transportation Safety Board.

Ms. Florence A.P. Carr, Director, Bureau of Trade Analysis, Federal Maritime Commission.

Ms. Susan A. Kantrowitz, Director, Office of Administration, National Transportation Safety Board (will review Edward Benthall's appraisal).

Ms. Jerold Gidner, Principal Deputy Special Trustee, Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians Department of the Interior.

Ms. Claudia J. Postell, Deputy Associate Commissioner, Office of Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity, Social Security Administration, PRB Alternate Member.

Dated: October 5, 2017.

Candi R. Bing,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2017-21985 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Susquehanna Media Co. (the
Company) for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John L. Finlayson, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ John L. Finlayson
John L. Finlayson
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2005
Exhibit 10.13







EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


AMENDMENT # 2







This Employment Agreement Amendment #2 (“Amendment #2”) is entered into as of December 31, 2012, by and between TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION, a New Mexico corporation (“Trinity”), LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association (“LANB”), TITLE GUARANTY & INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Mexico corporation (“Title Guaranty”), each with their principal offices in Los Alamos, New Mexico (collectively, the “Companies”), and WILLIAM C. ENLOE (“Enloe”), and describes the terms and conditions modifying the Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) between Companies and Enloe dated January 16, 2007, as amended.







WHEREAS, the parties wish to modify certain terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement as provided herein to comply with recent changes in the laws and regulations.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and upon the terms and conditions set forth below, the parties agree as follows:








		1.	Section 4 of the Employment Agreement is revised to read as follows:





 


“Termination Other than For Cause.  Trinity may terminate Enloe’s employment under this Agreement without Cause at any time upon sixty (60) days prior written notice.  Upon termination without Cause, Trinity shall pay Enloe an amount equal to his annual Base Salary in one lump sum on the sixtieth (60th) day following termination of employment provided that Enloe has not later than thirty (30) days following his termination of employment provided Trinity with the release required by Section 10 hereof.  In addition, Trinity shall pay Enloe any earned and unpaid Base Salary and vacation pay earned as of the Date of Termination, and shall have no further obligations to Enloe under this Agreement.”


 



		2.	Section 10 of the Employment Agreement is revised to read as follows:





 


“Release of Employment Claims.  Enloe agrees, as a condition to receipt of the payments and benefits provided in Section D, that he will execute and return to Trinity no later than thirty (30) days after the date of his termination of employment a comprehensive release, releasing any and all claims arising out of his employment (other than enforcement of this Agreement and his rights under any of Trinity’s incentive compensation and employee benefit plans and programs to which he is entitled under this Agreement) upon termination from the Companies for any reason.”


 








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused this Employment Agreement Amendment #2 to be executed by its duly authorized officer and William C. Enloe has hereunto signed this Amendment #2 on the date first above written.


 


	
WILLIAM C. ENLOE

		
TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

	
	 			
	
/ s/ William C. Enloe

		
/s/ Arthur B. Montoya, Jr.

	
	William C. Enloe		
By:  Arthur B. Montoya, Jr.

	
	 		
Its:  Director

	
	 			
	 		
LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL BANK

	
	 			
	 		
/s/ Arthur B. Montoya, Jr.

	
	 		
By:  Arthur B. Montoya, Jr.

	
	 		
Its:  Director

	



 


 


2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2694 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2694

 To authorize the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard 
 is operating to issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise 
               endorsement for the vessel GULF DIVER IV.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2009

  Mr. Inslee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard 
 is operating to issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise 
               endorsement for the vessel GULF DIVER IV.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COASTWISE ENDORSEMENT AUTHORIZED.

    Notwithstanding sections 12112 and 12132 of title 46, United States 
Code, the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is 
operating may issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise 
endorsement for the vessel GULF DIVER IV (United States official number 
553457).
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7555

MACKSON BRODIE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. TIMOTHY MCKOY , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , Chief District Judge. ( 5:16

- hc

- 02234

- D )

Submitted : April 19, 2018 Decided: April 23, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Mackson Brodie, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Mackson Brodie seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Sla ck v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brodie has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appe alability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22008]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL17-79-000]


Tilton Energy LLC; Notice of Institution of Section 206 
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On October 5, 2017, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
EL17-79-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether the rates 
for Reactive Supply and Voltage Control Service (Reactive Service) of 
Tilton Energy LLC may be unjust and unreasonable. Tilton Energy LLC, 
161 FERC 61,023 (2017).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL17-79-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL17-79-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 
days of the date of issuance of the order.

    Dated: October 5, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-22008 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 47656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22182]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 112

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0921]
RIN 0910-ZA50


Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of 
Produce for Human Consumption; Extension of Compliance Dates for 
Subpart E; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is 
correcting a proposed rule that published in the Federal Register of 
September 13, 2017. That proposed rule proposes to extend, for covered 
produce other than sprouts, the dates for compliance with the 
agricultural water provisions in the ``Standards for the Growing, 
Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human Consumption'' 
regulation. We are placing a corrected copy of the proposed rule in the 
docket.

DATES: October 13, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samir Assar, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-317), Food and Drug Administration, 5001 
Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-1636.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of September 13, 
2017 (82 FR 42963), FDA published the proposed rule ``Standards for the 
Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human 
Consumption; Extension of Compliance Dates for Subpart E'' with an 
omission.
    In FR Doc. 2017-19434, appearing on page 42963 in the Federal 
Register of September 13, 2017, the following correction is made:
    On page 42967, in the third column, the paragraph above the table 
is corrected to include the fourth sentence as follows: ``There would 
be a reduction in benefits associated with extending the compliance 
dates as described previously. Consumers eating non-sprout covered 
produce would not enjoy the potential health benefits (i.e., reduced 
risk of illness) provided by the provisions of subpart E until 2 to 4 
years (depending on the specific provision) later than originally 
established in the produce safety regulation. Thus, the annualized 
total benefits to consumers, discounted at 3 percent over 10 years, 
would decrease by $108 million from $1.033 billion to $925 million. 
Taking into consideration both the reduction in costs and the reduction 
in benefits, using a 3 (7) percent discount rate, the proposed rule 
would have negative annualized net benefits of $96 ($97) million. 
Estimated changes in benefits and costs as a result of this proposed 
extension are summarized in the following table.''

    Dated: October 10, 2017.
Anna K. Abram,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning, Legislation, and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2017-22182 Filed 10-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Exhibit
      ___





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**




I,
      Vincent De Lorenzo, certify that:





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Creative Development
      Corporation. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
      2007 (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: October 9, 2007/s/ Vincent
              De LorenzoVincent
              De LorenzoChief
                Financial Officer
#### Caryn J. Block, Appellant, v Jeffrey A. Block, Respondent.

[665 NYS2d 882]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered June 4, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant husband’s motion for pendente lite access to the marital residence, denied plaintiff wife’s cross motion for pendente lite exclusive occupancy of the iharital residence, and granted the wife’s cross motion for various other pendente lite relief to the extent of awarding her $1,000 per month in tax-free maintenance, $1,600 per month in child support, and $5,000 in interim counsel fees without prejudice to future applications, unanimously modified, on the law, and the facts, to deny the husband’s motion for access to the marital residence and to grant the wife’s cross motion for exclusive occupancy of the marital residence, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

In light of the husband’s admission that due to marital strife, he voluntarily vacated the marital residence shortly after signing a one-year sublease for an apartment, and the unrebutted expert evidence concerning the impact of the domestic strife on the wife prior to the husband’s departure and the potential harm to the wife and children if the husband returned, the motion court erred in not granting the wife’s cross motion for exclusive occupancy of the marital residence and in granting

*154the husband’s motion for complete access thereto *(see, Annexstein v Annexstein,*202 AD2d 1062; *Lawson v Lawson,*194 AD2d 389; *Kristiansen v Kristiansen,*144 AD2d 441). The awards of temporary maintenance, temporary child support and interim counsel fees constitute a reasonable balancing of the parties’ financial needs and wherewithal and of the other factors set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHRISTINE GREGORY, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-562

)

DANIEL GREGORY, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed February 9, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Emmett L. Battles,

Judge.

Anya Van Veen, Brian M. Spiro, and

Jeffrey H. Skatoff of Clark Skatoff PA,

Palm Beach Gardens, for Appellant.

Mercedes G. Hale of Hale and Messina

Law, PLLC, Wesley Chapel, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Harley Davidson, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1274 C.D. 2019

:

Workers' Compensation Appeal :

Board (Ness), :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, August 17, 2020

, upon consideration of P etitioner’s

application for re argument

, and R espondent Brian Ness ’s answer in response

thereto, the application is denied.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 20593

**Vernon King, Jr.,**

Plaintiff

— Appellant **,**

versus

**Jeffery S. Richardson; Terry Bursoh,** Assistant Warden **; Tracy Hutto,**  Assistant Warden **; Ms. Alla,** Mailroom Supervisor **,**
Defendants

— Appellees

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CV

- 2952

Before **Elrod, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Vernon King, Jr., Texas prisoner # 590316, moves for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) after the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). King has failed to show that he should be allowed to proceed IFP on appeal under § 1915(g) or that his appeal of the

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Cour t of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 29, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-20593 Document: 00516259184 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/29/2022No. 21

- 20593

2 district court’s judgment presents a nonfrivolous issue. See Banos v. O’Guin , 144 F.3d 883, 885 (5th Cir. 1998); Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). The motion for leave to proceed IFP is denied. King’s motion to appoint counsel likewise is denied.
The facts surrounding the IFP decision are inextr icably intertwined with the merits of the appeal. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th Cir. 1997). The appeal presents no nonfrivolous issues and is dismissed
as frivolous. See **5th Cir. R. 42.2**
The district court in which King filed his in stant complaint previously sanctioned him $200 and barred him from filing further suits without first receiving permission from a judicial officer. See King v. Carter , No. 4:17

- CV

832 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 13, 2017) (unpublished) . There is no indication that

K ing paid the sanction or received permission to file the instant complaint. In light of King’s history, he is ordered to pay a sanction of $300 to the clerk of court, and he is barred from filing any pleading in this court or any court subject to this cou rt’s jurisdiction until the sanction is paid in full, unless he obtains leave of the court in which he seeks to file such pleading. King is
warned that the filing of repetitive or frivolous pleadings in this court or any court subject to this court’s juri sdiction could result in additional sanctions.
He is directed to review all pending matters and to move to dismiss any that are frivolous, repetitive, or otherwise abusive.

**MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSE D AS**  **FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION IMPOSED; SANCTION WARNING** 
**ISSUED**

**.** Case: 21-20593 Document: 00516259184 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/29/2022
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 22, 2020

t1214 

# Order

Clerk December 22, 2020

161194

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161194

COA: 347732

Wayne CC: 17

- 009007

- FH

DEMARCO ROOSEVELT BRADBURY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2020

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                               EXHIBIT 23



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To Board of Directors
Strouds, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 33-87608 and No. 33-87610) of our report dated April 1, 1998, 
relating to the balance sheets of Strouds, Inc. as of February 28, 1998 and
March 1, 1997 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February
28, 1998, which report appears in the February 28, 1998 Annual Report on Form
10-K of Strouds, Inc.



/s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
--------------------------
Los Angeles, California
May 22, 1998