46756 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Notices 

appropriate. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

These preliminary results of review 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: October 2, 2017. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations 

performing the non-exclusive duties of the 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Use of Facts otherwise Available and 

Application of Adverse Inferences 

V. Application of the Countervailing Duty 

Law to Imports from the PRC 

VI. Subsidies Valuation 

VII. Interest Rate Benchmarks, Discount 

Rates, Input, Electricity, and Land 

Benchmarks 

VIII. Analysis of Programs 

IX. Disclosure and Public Comment 

X. Verification 

XI. Conclusion 

Appendix II 

Companies Not Selected for Review 

1. Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd. 

2. Air Sea Transport Inc 

3. Air Sea Worldwide Logistics Ltd 

4. AM Global Shipping Lines 

5. Apex Maritime Co Ltd 

6. Apex Maritime Thailand Co Ltd 

7. BDP Intl LTD China 

8. Beijing Kang Jie Kong Intl Cargo 

Agent Co Ltd 

9. C&D Intl Freight Forward Inc 

10. Caesar Intl Logistics Co Ltd 

11. Caterpillar & Paving Products 

Xuzhou Ltd 

12. CH Robinson Freight Services China 

LTD 

13. Changzhou Kafurter Machinery Co 

Ltd 

14. Cheng Shin Rubber (Xiamen) Ind 

Ltd 

15. China Intl Freight Co Ltd 

16. Chonche Auto Double Happiness 

Tyre Corp Ltd 

17. City Ocean Logistics Co Ltd 

18. Consolidator Intl Co Ltd 

19. Crowntyre Industrial Co. Ltd 

20. CTS Intl Logistics Corp 

21. Daewoo Intl Corp 

22. De Well Container Shipping Inc 

23. Double Coin Holdings Ltd; Double 

Coin Group Shanghai Donghai Tyre 

Co., Ltd; and Double Coin Group 

Rugao Tyre Co., Ltd. (collectively 

‘‘Double Coin’’) 

24. England Logistics (Qingdao) Co Ltd 

25. Extra Type Co Ltd 

26. Fedex International Freight 

Forwarding Services Shanghai Co 

Ltd 

27. FG Intl Logistics Ltd 

28. Global Container Line 

29. Honour Lane Shipping 

30. Innova Rubber Co., Ltd. 

31. Inspire Intl Enterprise Co Ltd 

32. JHJ Intl Transportation Co 

33. Jiangsu Feichi Co. Ltd. 

34. Kenda Rubber (China) Co Ltd 

35. KS Holding Limited/KS Resources 

Limited 

36. Laizhou Xiongying Rubber Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

37. Landmax Intl Co Ltd 

38. LF Logistics China Co Ltd 

39. Mai Shandong Radial Tyre Co., Ltd. 

40. Maine Industrial Tire LLC 

41. Master Intl Logistics Co Ltd 

42. Melton Tire Co. Ltd 

43. Merityre Specialists Ltd 

44. Mid-America Overseas Shanghai Ltd 

45. Omni Exports Ltd 

46. Orient Express Container Co Ltd 

47. Oriental Tyre Technology Limited 

48. Pudong Prime Intl Logistics Inc 

49. Q&J Industrial Group Co Ltd 

50. Qingdao Aotai Rubber Co Ltd 

51. Qingdao Apex Shipping 

52. Qingdao Chengtai Handtruck Co Ltd 

53. Qingdao Chunangtong Founding Co 

Ltd 

54. Qingdao Free Trade Zone FullWorld International Trading Co., 

Ltd. 

55. Qingdao Haojia (Xinhai) Tyre Co. 

56. Qingdao Haomai Hongyi Mold Co 

Ltd 

57. Qingdao J&G Intl Trading Co Ltd 

58. Qingdao Jinhaoyang International 

Co. Ltd 

59. Qingdao Kaoyoung Intl Logistics Co 

Ltd 

60. Qingdao Milestone Tyres Co Ltd. 

61. Qingdao Nexen Co Ltd 

62. Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co. 

63. Qingdao Qizhou Rubber Co., Ltd. 

64. Qingdao Shijikunyuan Intl Co Ltd 

65. Qingdao Sinorient International Ltd. 

66. Qingdao Taifa Group Imp. And Exp. 

Co., Ltd./Qingdao Taifa Group Co., 

Ltd. 

67. Qingdao Wonderland 

68. Qingdao Zhenhua Barrow 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

69. Rich Shipping Company 

70. RS Logistics Ltd 

71. Schenker China Ltd 

72. Seastar Intl Enterprise Ltd 

73. SGL Logistics South China Ltd 

74. Shandong Huitong Tyre Co., Ltd. 

75. Shandong Linglong Tyre Co., Ltd. 

76. Shandong Taishan Tyre Co. Ltd. 

77. Shanghai Cartec Industrial & 

Trading Co Ltd 

78. Shanghai Grand Sound Intl 

Transportation Co Ltd 

79. Shanghai Hua Shen Imp & Exp Co 

Ltd 

80. Shanghai Part-Rich Auto Parts Co 

Ltd 

81. Shanghai TCH Metals & Machinery 

Co Ltd 

82. Shantou Zhisheng Plastic Co Ltd 

83. Shiyan Desizheng Industry & Trade 

Co., Ltd. 

84. Techking Tires Limited 

85. Thi Group (Shanghai) Ltd 

86. Tianjin Leviathan International 

Trade Co., Ltd. 

87. Tianjin United Tire & Rubber 

International Co., Ltd. 

88. Tianjin Wanda Tyre Group Co. 

89. Tianshui Hailin Import and Export 

Corporation 

90. Tiremart Qingdao Inc 

91. Translink Shipping Inc 

92. Trelleborg Wheel Systems (Xingtai) 

China, Co. Ltd. 

93. Trelleborg Wheel Systems Hebei Co 

94. Triangle Tyre Co. Ltd. 

95. Universal Shipping Inc 

96. UTI China Ltd 

97. Weifang Jintongda Tyre Co., Ltd. 

98. Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co., Ltd. 

99. Weiss-Rohlig China Co Ltd 

100. World Bridge Logistics Co Ltd 

101. World Tyres Ltd. 

102. Xiamen Ying Hong Import & Export 

Trade Co Ltd 

103. Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co Ltd; 

Xuzhou Armour Rubber Company 

Ltd.; HK Lande International 

Investment Limited; Armour Tires 

Inc. (collectively ‘‘Xugong’’) 

104. Yoho Holding 

105. Zheijiang Wheel World Industrial 

Co Ltd 

106. Zhejiang Xinchang Zhongya 

Industry Co., Ltd. 

107. Zhongce Rubber Group Company 

Limited 

108. ZPH Industrial Ltd 

[FR Doc. 2017–21586 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[Application No. 84–28A12] 

Export Trade Certificate of Review 

ACTION: Notice of Application for an 

Amended Export Trade Certificate of 

Review by Northwest Fruit Exporters, 

Application No. 84–28A12. 

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Commerce, 

through the International Trade 

Administration, Office of Trade and 

Economic Analysis (OTEA), has 

received an application for an amended 

Export Trade Certificate of Review 

(‘‘Certificate’’) from Northwest Fruit 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Notices 46757 

Exporters. This notice summarizes the 

proposed amendment and seeks public 

comments on whether the amended 

Certificate should be issued. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joseph E. Flynn, Director, Office of 

Trade and Economic Analysis, 

International Trade Administration, by 

telephone at (202) 482–5131 (this is not 

a toll-free number) or email at etca@

trade.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of 

the Export Trading Company Act of 

1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the 

Secretary of Commerce to issue Export 

Trade Certificates of Review. An Export 

Trade Certificate of Review protects the 

holder and the members identified in 

the Certificate from State and Federal 

government antitrust actions and from 

private treble damage antitrust actions 

for the export conduct specified in the 

Certificate and carried out in 

compliance with its terms and 

conditions. Section 302(b)(1) of the 

Export Trading Company Act of 1982 

and 15 CFR 325.6(a) require the 

Secretary to publish a notice in the 

Federal Register identifying the 

applicant and summarizing its proposed 

export conduct. 

Request for Public Comments 

Interested parties may submit written 

comments relevant to the determination 

whether an amended Certificate should 

be issued. If the comments include any 

privileged or confidential business 

information, it must be clearly marked 

and a nonconfidential version of the 

comments (identified as such) should be 

included. Any comments not marked as 

privileged or confidential business 

information will be deemed to be 

nonconfidential. 

An original and five (5) copies, plus 

two (2) copies of the nonconfidential 

version, should be submitted no later 

than 20 days after the date of this notice 

to: Export Trading Company Affairs, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 

21028, Washington, DC 20230. 

Information submitted by any person 

is exempt from disclosure under the 

Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 

552). However, nonconfidential versions 

of the comments will be made available 

to the applicant if necessary for 

determining whether or not to issue the 

amended Certificate. Comments should 

refer to this application as ‘‘Export 

Trade Certificate of Review, application 

number 84–28A12.’’ 

A summary of the current application 

follows. 

Summary of the Application 

Applicant: Northwest Fruit Exporters, 

105 South 18th Street, Suite 227, 

Yakima, WA 98901. 

Contact: Fred Scarlett, Manager, (509) 

576–8004. 

Application No.: 84–28A12. 

Date Deemed Submitted: September 

20, 2017. 

Proposed Amendment: Northwest 

Fruit Exporters seeks to amend its 

Certificate as follows: 

1. Add a definition of ‘‘export quota’’ 

to clarify that export quotas are those 

imposed by an authorized government 

entity in the receiving country. The term 

does not include a growers association. 

2. Add the Affiliate Contractor to the 

Export Trade Certificate of Review, as 

the Affiliate Contractor will provide 

management services by contract to 

assist Northwest Fruit Exporters in 

carrying out its activities authorized 

under the Export Trade Certificate of 

Review: 

3. Add a definition of ‘‘Affiliate 

Contractor’’ to recognize that the 

Northwest Horticultural Council 

(‘‘NHC’’) will be providing management 

services by contract to assist NFE in 

carrying out its activities authorized 

under the Export Trade Certificate of 

Review. 

4. Add a clarifying amendment 

restating that meetings at which the NFE 

Board of Directors may allocate quotas 

among its members or establish export 

prices shall not be open to the public or 

to members of NFE not represented on 

the NFE Board of Directors. Employees 

of the Affiliate Contractor are eligible to 

attend such meetings. 

5. Add an amendment that through 

the management services agreement 

between NFE and NHC, NHC staff may 

receive or have access to NFE 

information that is confidential or 

proprietary (‘‘Confidential 

Information’’). Employees of NHC will 

be required to maintain the 

confidentiality of the Confidential 

Information as is currently required of 

NFE employees. Failure to maintain the 

confidentiality of NFE’s Confidential 

Information shall be cause for 

termination of employment 

6. Change the name of the following 

existing Member: 

• From Columbia Marketing 

International, LLC to CMI Orchards, 

LLC 

Northwest Fruit Exporter’s Export 

Trade Certificate of Review complete 

amended membership is listed below: 

1. Allan Bros., Naches, WA 

2. AltaFresh L.L.C. dba Chelan Fresh 

Marketing, Chelan, WA 

3. Apple House Warehouse & Storage, Inc., 

Brewster, WA 

4. Apple King, L.L.C., Yakima, WA 

5. Auvil Fruit Co., Inc., Orondo, WA 

6. Baker Produce, Inc., Kennewick, WA 

7. Blue Bird, Inc., Peshastin, WA 

8. Blue Star Growers, Inc., Cashmere, WA 

9. Borton & Sons, Inc., Yakima, WA 

10. Brewster Heights Packing & Orchards, LP, 

Brewster, WA 

11. Broetje Orchards LLC, Prescott, WA 

12. C.M. Holtzinger Fruit Co., Inc., Yakima, 

WA 

13. CMI Orchards, LLC, Wenatchee, WA 

14. Chelan Fruit Cooperative, Chelan, WA 

15. Chiawana, Inc. dba Columbia Reach Pack, 

Yakima, WA 

16. Columbia Fruit Packers, Inc., Wenatchee, 

WA 

17. Columbia Fruit Packers/Airport Division, 

Wenatchee, WA 

18. Columbia Valley Fruit, L.L.C., Yakima, 

WA 

19. Congdon Packing Co. L.L.C., Yakima, WA 

20. Conrad & Adams Fruit L.L.C., Grandview, 

WA 

21. Cowiche Growers, Inc., Cowiche, WA 

22. CPC International Apple Company, 

Tieton, WA 

23. Crane & Crane, Inc., Brewster, WA 

24. Custom Apple Packers, Inc., Quincy, and 

Wenatchee, WA 

25. Diamond Fruit Growers, Odell, OR 

26. Domex Superfresh Growers LLC, Yakima, 

WA 

27. Douglas Fruit Company, Inc., Pasco, WA 

28. Dovex Export Company, Wenatchee, WA 

29. Duckwall Fruit, Odell, OR 

30. E. Brown & Sons, Inc., Milton-Freewater, 

OR 

31. Evans Fruit Co., Inc., Yakima, WA 

32. E.W. Brandt & Sons, Inc., Parker, WA 

33. Frosty Packing Co., LLC, Yakima, WA 

34. G&G Orchards, Inc., Yakima, WA 

35. Gilbert Orchards, Inc., Yakima, WA 

36. Gold Digger Apples, Inc., Oroville, WA 

37. Hansen Fruit & Cold Storage Co., Inc., 

Yakima, WA 

38. Henggeler Packing Co., Inc., Fruitland, ID 

39. Highland Fruit Growers, Inc., Yakima, 

WA 

40. HoneyBear Growers, Inc., Brewster, WA 

41. Honey Bear Tree Fruit Co., LLC, 

Wenatchee, WA 

42. Hood River Cherry Company, Hood River, 

OR 

43. Ice Lakes LLC, East Wenatchee, WA 

44. JackAss Mt. Ranch, Pasco, WA 

45. Jenks Bros Cold Storage & Packing Royal 

City, WA 

46. Kershaw Fruit & Cold Storage, Co., 

Yakima, WA 

47. L&M Companies, Union Gap, WA 

48. Larson Fruit Co., Selah, WA 

49. Legacy Fruit Packers LLC, Wapato, WA 

50. Manson Growers Cooperative, Manson, 

WA 

51. Matson Fruit Company, Selah, WA 

52. McDougall & Sons, Inc., Wenatchee, WA 

53. Monson Fruit Co. Selah, WA 

54. Morgan’s of Washington dba Double 

Diamond Fruit, Quincy, WA 

55. Naumes, Inc., Medford, OR 

56. Northern Fruit Company, Inc., 

Wenatchee, WA 

57. Olympic Fruit Co., Moxee, WA 

58. Oneonta Trading Corp., Wenatchee, WA 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
46758 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Notices 

1See Beijing Tianhai Indus. Co. v. United States, 

Slip Op. 17–105 (CIT August 17, 2017) (Beijing 

Tianhai IV); see also Final Results of 

Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, High 

Pressure Steel Cylinders from the People’s Republic 

of China, Beijing Tianhai Indus. Co., Ltd. v. United 

States, Court No. 12–00203, Slip Op. 17–79 (CIT 

July 5, 2017), dated August 3, 2017 (Third Remand 

Redetermination); High Pressure Steel Cylinders 

from the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value, 77 

FR 26739 (May 7, 2012) (Final Determination), and 

accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum; 

and High Pressure Steel Cylinders from the People’s 

Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 

37377 (June 21, 2012) (Order). 

2See Final Determination, and accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum at 23–24. 

3 Id. at 24–26. 

4See Beijing Tianhai Indus. Co. v. United States, 

7 F. Supp. 3d 1318 (CIT 2014) (Beijing Tianhai I). 

5See Beijing Tianhai I, 7 F. Supp. 3d at 1331– 

32. 

6 Id. at 1332–37. 

7 Id. at 1337. 

8See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Remand, High Pressure Steel Cylinders 

from the People’s Republic of China, Beijing 

Tianhai Indus. Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 

12–00203, Slip Op. 14–104 (CIT September 9, 

2014), dated January 7, 2015 (First Remand 

Redetermination). 

9See Beijing Tianhai Indus. Co. v. United States, 

106 F. Supp. 3d 1342, 1352–56 (CIT 2015) (Beijing 

Tianhai II) 

10 Id. at 1351. 

11 Id. 

59. Orchard View Farms, Inc., The Dalles, OR 

60. Pacific Coast Cherry Packers, LLC, 

Yakima, WA 

61. Peshastin Hi-Up Growers, Peshastin, WA 

62. Phillippi Fruit Company, Inc., 

Wenatchee, WA 

63. Piepel Premium Fruit Packing LLC, East 

Wenatchee, WA 

64. Polehn Farm’s Inc., The Dalles, OR 

65. Price Cold Storage & Packing Co., Inc., 

Yakima, WA 

66. Pride Packing Company, Wapato, WA 

67. Quincy Fresh Fruit Co., Quincy, WA 

68. Rainier Fruit Company, Selah, WA 

69. Roche Fruit, Ltd., Yakima, WA 

70. Sage Fruit Company, L.L.C., Yakima, WA 

71. Smith & Nelson, Inc., Tonasket, WA 

72. Stadelman Fruit, L.L.C., MiltonFreewater, OR, and Zillah, WA 

73. Stemilt Growers, LLC, Wenatchee, WA 

74. Strand Apples, Inc., Cowiche, WA 

75. Symms Fruit Ranch, Inc., Caldwell, ID 

76. The Dalles Fruit Company, LLC, 

Dallesport, WA 

77. Underwood Fruit & Warehouse Co., 

Bingen, WA 

78. Valicoff Fruit Co., Inc., Wapato, WA 

79. Valley Fruit III L.L.C., Wapato, WA 

80. Washington Cherry Growers, Peshastin, 

WA 

81. Washington Fruit & Produce Co., Yakima, 

WA 

82. Western Sweet Cherry Group, LLC, 

Yakima, WA 

83. Western Traders LLC, E. Wenatchee, WA 

84. Whitby Farms, Inc. dba: Farm Boy Fruit 

Snacks LLC, Mesa, WA 

85. Yakima Fresh, Yakima, WA 

86. Yakima Fruit & Cold Storage Co., Yakima, 

WA 

87. Zirkle Fruit Company, Selah, WA 

Dated: October 2, 2017. 

Joseph E. Flynn, 

Director, Office of Trade and Economic 

Analysis, International Trade Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2017–21557 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–977] 

High Pressure Steel Cylinders From 

the People’s Republic of China: Notice 

of Court Decision Not in Harmony With 

Final Determination in Less Than Fair 

Value Investigation, Notice of 

Amended Final Determination 

Pursuant to Court Decision, Notice of 

Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order 

in Part, and Discontinuation of Fifth 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On August 17, 2017, the Court 

of International Trade (CIT or Court) 

sustained the Department of 

Commerce’s (Department) remand 

redetermination pertaining to the final 

determination in the less than fair value 

(LTFV) investigation of high pressure 

steel cylinders from the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC). Because of the 

CIT’s final decision, we are notifying the 

public that this court decision is not in 

harmony with the Department’s final 

determination in the LTFV 

investigation, and we are also amending 

our final determination, revoking this 

antidumping duty order, in part, and 

discontinuing the fifth administrative 

review. 

DATES: Applicable August 27, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Annathea Cook, AD/CVD Operations 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0250. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

As noted above, on August 17, 2017, 

the CIT sustained the Department’s 

Third Remand Redetermination 

pertaining to the final determination in 

the less than fair value (LTFV) 

investigation of high pressure steel 

cylinders from the People’s Republic of 

China (PRC).1 In the underlying LTFV 

investigation, the Department found 

that, pursuant to section 777A(d)(1)(B) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(Act), ‘‘there was a pattern of prices that 

differ significantly by time period’’ for 

respondent Beijing Tianhai Industry 

Co., Ltd. (BTIC), and that ‘‘application 

of the standard A-to-A {(average-toaverage)} methodology would result in 

the masking of dumping that is 

unmasked by application of the 

alternative A-to-T {(average-totransaction)} methodology when 

calculating BTIC’s weighted-average 

dumping margin.’’ 2 In the Final 

Determination, the Department 

calculated BTIC’s estimated weightedaverage dumping margin using the A-toT comparison method, applied to all of 

BTIC’s export sales.3 In Beijing Tianhai 

I,4 the CIT held that the Department’s 

explanation of its ‘‘meaningful 

difference’’ analysis in the Final 

Determination was insufficient to satisfy 

the explanation requirement under 

section 777A(d)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act, and 

also found that ‘‘the explanation ignores 

the potential use of the {transaction-totransaction} methodology entirely.’’ 5

With respect to BTIC’s challenge to the 

Department’s application of the A-to-T 

methodology to all of BTIC’s export 

sales as being inconsistent with 19 CFR 

351.414(f), a regulation BTIC alleged 

had been inappropriately withdrawn, 

the CIT also held that ‘‘even if the 

Department’s withdrawal of 19 CFR 

351.414(f) (2007) was in violation of the 

APA’s {(Administrative Procedure Act)} 

notice and comment requirement, that 

error was harmless as it relates to the 

plaintiff in this case,’’ and also that ‘‘the 

Department need not adhere to the 

requirements of 19 CFR 351.414(f) 

(2007).’’ 6 The Court deferred resolution 

of several other issues pertaining to the 

Department’s targeted dumping analysis 

and application of the A-to-T 

comparison method when determining 

BTIC’s estimated weighted-average 

dumping margin in Beijing Tianhai I.7

Following the Department’s First 

Remand Redetermination,8 the CIT in 

Beijing Tianhai II sustained the 

Department’s Final Determination as to 

the other issues that BTIC challenged, 

for which the CIT had deferred 

consideration in Beijing Tianhai I.9

However, with regard to the 

Department’s ‘‘meaningful difference’’ 

analysis and the further analysis the 

Department provided in the First 

Remand Redetermination on that issue, 

the CIT held that ‘‘the Department has 

chosen a narrative rather than an 

explanation,’’ and ‘‘failed to satisfy the 

requirements of the statute.’’ 10 The 

Court again remanded that issue to the 

Department.11


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES