alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               2,690
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,920,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                       382,000
<INVENTORY>                                      9,555,897
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,329,240
<PP&E>                                           6,462,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,555,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,929,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,569,715
<BONDS>                                            912,585
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            34,998
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,412,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,929,960
<SALES>                                         41,559,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,559,597
<CGS>                                           30,599,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,599,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    85,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 612,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,231,605
<INCOME-TAX>                                       404,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                827,605
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       827,605
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO
 STOCK PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

 

This FIRST AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) to that certain Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of April 29, 2013 (the “Purchase Agreement”) is entered into this      day of November 2014 by and among Courier New Media, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (“Acquiror”), FastPencil, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), all of the holders of capital stock of the Company (each a “Seller,” and collectively, the “Sellers”), and Steven K. Wilson as Holder Representative. Defined terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein;

 

NOW THEREFORE, in return for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree that the Agreement is amended as follows:

 

1.              The definition of “First Earnout Amount” is hereby amended to be “$5,500,000.”

 

2.              The Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as amended hereby.

 

The undersigned hereby agree to this First Amendment to the Purchase Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

	
COURIER NEW   MEDIA, INC.
    	
 
    	
STEVEN K. WILSON, AS HOLDER   REPRESENTATIVE, AND BY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SELLERS UNDER THE PURCHASE   AGREEMENT
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Rajeev Balakrishna
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Steven K. Wilson
    
	
Name:
    	
Rajeev Balakrishna
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Steven K. Wilson
    
	
Title:
    	
SVP & GC
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Holder Representative
    
	
Date:
    	
11/5/14
    	
 
    	
Date:
    	
11/5/14
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
FASTPENCIL, INC.
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Rajeev Balakrishna
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Rajeev Balakrishna
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
SVP & GC
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
11/5/14
Exhibit 32.02
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER
  I, Vincent Lorenzo, certify that:
  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Digital Creative Development Corporation for the quarter ending December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of op ations of the Company.
  Date: June 28, 2011
/s/ Vincent LorenzoVincent LorenzoChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Gary Allanson, Chief Executive Officer of International
Dispensing Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Edwin Tharp,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
          ended March 31, 2003, which this certification accompanies, fully
          complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.



 May 15, 2003                                   /s/ Gary Allanson
                                                -------------------------
                                                Gary Allanson
                                                Chief Executive Officer











                                       46
#### Sylvester E. HARDING, III, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent.

No. 2011-3091.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 16, 2011.

Reconsideration Denied July 6, 2011.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Sylvester Harding, III moves for summary judgment in this petition for review. The Department of Veterans Affairs opposes Harding’s motion.

Summary judgment is not appropriate in a court of appeals. Arguments concerning the merits of a case should be placed in the briefs.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

The motion is denied. Harding’s brief (form enclosed) is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19 - 6881

ANGEL PICHARDO

- MARTINEZ , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE; LAKE COUNTY JAIL; LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; LAKE COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF; LAKE COUNTY JAIL SHIFT COMMANDER ON DUTY BETWEEN 02

- 10

- 16 TO 04

- 19

- 16 , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh , Chief District Judge. ( 3:19

- cv - 0 0070

- GMG )

Submitted : September 26, 2019 Decided: October 1, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Angel Pichardo

- Martinez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Angel Pichardo

- Martinez appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Pichardo

Martinez’s complaint fil ed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stat ed by the district court. Pichardo

- Martinez v. U.S. Marshal Serv. , No. 3:19

- cv - 00070

- GMG (N.D.W. Va. June 7, 2019) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and arg ument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimberly Jean PALMER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30141.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 9, 2011.

Carl E. Rostad, USGF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Donahoe, Esq., FDMT — Federal Defenders of Montana Helena Branch Office, Helena, MT, for Defendani>-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*677MEMORANDUM **

Kimberly Jean Palmer appeals from the 48-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea for wire fraud/business embezzlement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1348, and bank fraud/employer embezzlement scheme, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Palmer contends that her sentence is substantively unreasonable because it is based on her need for treatment, does not reflect her impulse control condition, and creates an unwarranted sentencing disparity with similar situated defendants. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, the sentence is substantively reasonable. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

Palmer also contends that the district court departed from the Sentencing Guidelines and failed to provide notice under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(h). The record reflects that the district court varied from the Guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and it had no obligation to provide Palmer notice. *See Irizarry v. United States,*553 U.S. 708, 714, 128 S.Ct. 2198, 171 L.Ed.2d 28 (2008) (limiting the Rule 32(h) notice requirement to departures under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b)).

Contrary to Palmer’s contention, she is not entitled to judicial estoppel.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8No. 333-131156) pertaining to the 2005****Employee RestrictedStock Plan****of Polymer Group, Inc.,(Form S-8 No. 333-121252) pertaining to the 2003****EmployeeStock Option Plan****and (Form S-8No. 333-121254) pertaining to the 2004 Restricted Stock Plan for Directors****of Polymer Group, Inc. of our report dated March 23,2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of PolymerGroup, Inc, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2005.
|                            | /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                       |                            |
|                       |                            |
| Greenville, South Carolina |                            |
| March 14, 2006        |                            |

 

----
To the Directors
Junction 15 Limited

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the,

(a) Registration  Statement  on   Form  S-8 (No. 333-82959) of Vizacom Inc. (the
"Company") pertaining to the Company's 1994 Long Term Incentive Plan,

(b) Registration   Statement  on  Form  S-8  (No.  333-82951)  of  the   Company
pertaining to the Company's Outside Director and Advisor Stock Option Plan,

(c) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-19059) of the Company pertaining
to the  Software  Publishing  Corporation's  1987 Stock  Option  Plan,  Software
Publishing   Corporation's  1989  Stock  Option  Plan  and  Software  Publishing
Corporation's 1991 Stock Option Plan,

(d) Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-55677) of the Company pertaining
to 2,107,712 shares of the Company's common stock and 29,267 options to purchase
shares of the Company's common stock,

(e) Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-80181) of the Company pertaining
to  3,375,877  shares of the  Company's  common  stock and  167,052  warrants to
purchase shares of the Company's common stock and

(f) Registration  Statement  on   Form  S-3  (No.  333-93087)   pertaining   to
1,938,191 shares of the Company's common stock,

of our report,  dated April 4, 2000 with respect to the financial  statements of
Junction 15 Limited  included in the Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended  December  31,  1999,  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.


/s/ Silver Levene

Silver Levene
Chartered Certified Accountants
Registered Auditors

London, United Kingdom
April 13, 2000
Order filed, January 09, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-01053-CV

____________

RAMESH KAPUR D/B/A AIC MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Appellant

V.

THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-00556

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 25, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Norma Duarte, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8) pertaining to (i) the Amended and Restated 1996 EquityParticipation Plan of Varco International, Inc. (No. 333-38064), (ii) the D.O.S. Ltd. 1993 Stock Option Plan (No. 333-05237), (iii) Varco International Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended and restated effective April 1, 2001 (No. 333-105613),(iv) the Tuboscope Inc. Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan (No. 333-56039), (v) the Tuboscope Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (No. 333-56041), (vi) the Varco 1980 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Varco International, Inc. 1990 Stock OptionPlan and the Varco International, Inc. 1994 Directors’ Stock Option Plan (No. 333-38066), (vii) Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (333-72072), (viii) Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Key Employees and Directors (333-72150),(ix) Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Key Employees of Tuboscope Vetco International Corporation (No. 333-35179), (x) Varco International, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (No. 333-111445), and (xi) Varco International, Inc. 2003Equity Participation Plan (No. 333-105614) of Varco International, Inc. of our report dated February 2, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Varco International, Inc. included in this Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Houston, Texas

March 4, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000927388
<NAME> BGLS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,475
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     53,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,197
<PP&E>                                          79,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          229,736
<BONDS>                                        378,243
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (483,085)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,108
<SALES>                                        452,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               452,656
<CGS>                                          235,633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  235,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,790
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (69,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,254
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (74,604)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,385
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (72,219)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC
REPORT
 As
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter ended
December 31, 2009 of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Dina
L. Masi, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Integrated
BioPharma, Inc.certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to
her knowledge:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
 
 
 Dated:           February
12,
2010                                                          By:
/s/ Dina L. Masi
 Dina L. Masi
 Chief
Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
#### Aleyda Yaneth BARRIENTOS-SORTO; Oscar Samuel Barrientos-Sorto, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-70281.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 14, 2011.

Richard Clay Mendez, Esquire, Law Offices of Mendez & Lopez, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Lyle Davis Jentzer, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Aleyda Barrientos-Sorto and Oscar Bar-rientos-Sorto, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and *690protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, *Cerezo v. Mukasey,*512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir.2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing statutes and regulations, *Simeonov v. Ashcroft,*371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir.2004). We review for substantial evidence factual findings. *Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petition for review.

Petitioners contend they suffered past persecution and have a well-founded fear of future persecution by gangs in El Salvador. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that they failed to show past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of a protected ground. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 & n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992); *Parussimova v. Mukasey,*555 F.3d 734, 740-41 (9th Cir.2009) (“[t]he Real ID Act requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum applicant’s persecution”). Accordingly, petitioners’ asylum claims fail.

Because petitioners failed to meet *the*lower burden of proof for asylum, their claims for withholding of removal necessarily fail. *See Zehatye,*453 F.3d at 1190.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that petitioners are not entitled to CAT relief because they failed to demonstrate it is more likely than not that they will be tortured by or with the acquiescence of the El Salvadorean government if they return to El Salvador. *See Silaya v. Mukasey,*524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir.2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.