T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T SE AN BAPT I ST E NEAL, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. R O S E A N N E C A M P B E L L , W a r d e n ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 17225 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 3 1 3 - G EBK JM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G a r l a nd E . B urr e l l , J r . , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r21, 2011 ** B efo re: T A S H IM A , B E R Z O N , an dT A L L M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner S ean B apt i st e N ea l appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct court ’ s j ud gm enti n h i s 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on al l egi ng F i rs tA m endm entfr ee e x e r c is e a n dr e ta lia tio n c la im s . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s g r a n t o f s u m m a ryju d g m e n t, T

oguc hiv . Chung , 

# FI LED NO V 23 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 17225 2 3 9 1 F . 3 d1 0 5 1 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 4 ) , a n dd i s m i s s a l u n d e r2 8 U. S . C . § 1 9 1 5 A, R es ni ck v. H ayes , 2 1 3 F. 3 d4 4 3 , 4 4 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 0 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y grant ed sum m ary j ud gm enton N ea l ’ s f re e e x e r c is e c la im o n th e b a s is o f q u a lif ie dim m u n ityg r o u n d s b e c au s e N e a l f a ile dto r a is e ag e n u in e d is p u te o f m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w h e th e rd e f

e n d an ts s u b s ta n tia lly b u r d e n e dh is ab ilityto p r a c tic e h is r e lig io n . See R odri gu ezv. M

ari copa Cnt

y. Cm t y. C o l l. D ist ., 6 0 5 F .3 d7 0 3 , 7 1 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ( ad e f e n d a n t is e n title dto qu al i fi ed i m m un i ty i f there i s no con st i tut i on alvi ol at i on ); Sh a ku r v. Sch ri ro , 514 F . 3d 878, 884- 85 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( F r e e E xe r c i s e C l aus e i s onl yi m pl i c a t e d w he n a p r is o n p r a c tic e b u r d e n s a n in m a te ’s s in c e r e ly - h e ldr e lig io u s b e lie f s ) ; se e al so A l len v . T oom bs , 827 F . 2d 563, 568- 69 ( 9th C i r . 1987) ( pr i s on a dm i ni s tr a t or s ne e d not prov i de ea ch i nm at e w i th the spi ri tual coun se l or of hi s or herchoi ce ). T h e d istrict co u rt p ro p er ly d ism isse dN ea l’ s r etaliati o n claim b ec au se N ea l’ s c o n c lu s o rya lle g a tio n s f a ile dto s ta te ac la im f

o rr e ta lia tio n . See R ho des v . R obi ns on , 40 8 F . 3d 55 9, 56 7-68 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( se tt i ng forth fi ve el em ent s of a F i rs tA m endm entre t al i at i on cl ai m ). T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g N e a l’s m o tio n s to appoi nta n e xpe rtw i tne s s be c aus e N e a l ’ s a c t i on di d noti nvol ve c om pl e x i s s ue s or e v id e n c e . Se e W

alke rv . A m . H

om e Shi e ld L ong T

e rm D is abi l i t

yP lan , 180 F . 3d10- 17225 3 1065, 1071 ( 9th C i r . 1999) ( appoi ntm e ntof e xpe rti s r e vi e w e d f

orabus e of di sc re t i on ). AF F I RME D.