[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47269-47272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21814]



[[Page 47269]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81816; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2017-087]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; 
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the Listing 
Requirements Related to Special Purpose Acquisition Companies Listing 
Standards To Reduce Round Lot Holders on Nasdaq Capital Market for 
Initial Listing From 300 to 150 and Eliminate Public Holders for 
Continued Listing From 300 to Zero, Require $5 Million in Net Tangible 
Assets for Initial and Continued Listing, and Impose a Deadline To 
Demonstrate Compliance With Initial Listing Requirements on All Nasdaq 
Markets Within 30 Days Following Each Business Combination

October 4, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on September 20, 2017, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in 
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the 
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments 
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to modify the listing requirements related to 
Acquisition Companies.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
Web site at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of 
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    In 2009 Nasdaq adopted a rule (IM-5101-2) to impose additional 
listing requirements on a company whose business plan is to complete an 
initial public offering and engage in a merger or acquisition with one 
or more unidentified companies within a specific period of time 
(``Acquisition Companies'').\3\ Based on experience listing these 
companies and reviewing the post-acquisition entities, Nasdaq proposes 
to modify the listing requirements applicable to them. Specifically, 
Nasdaq proposes to reduce the number of round-lot holders required for 
initial listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market from 300 to 150 and to 
eliminate the continued listing shareholder requirement on the Nasdaq 
Capital Market during the period that the company is subject to IM-
5101-2.\4\ Nasdaq also proposes to require that an Acquisition Company 
listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market maintain at least $5 million in net 
tangible assets for initial and continued listing. Finally, Nasdaq 
proposes to impose a deadline for the company to demonstrate compliance 
with all initial listing requirements, including the 300, 400, and 450 
round-lot shareholder requirement on the Nasdaq Capital, Global and 
Global Select Markets, respectively, following a business combination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58228 (July 25, 2008), 
73 FR 44794 (July 31, 2008) (adopting the predecessor to IM-5101-2).
    \4\ Under IM-5101-2(b), an Acquisition Company must complete one 
or more business combinations having an aggregate fair market value 
of at least 80% of the value of the deposit account within 36 months 
of the effectiveness of its IPO registration statement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The additional requirements currently applicable to an Acquisition 
Company require, in part, that 90% of the gross proceeds of the 
company's offering must be deposited into and retained in an escrow 
account through the date of a business combination; that the entity 
complete a significant business combination within 36 months of the 
effectiveness of the IPO registration statement; and that public 
shareholders who object to the combination have the right to convert 
their common stock into a pro rata share of the funds held in 
escrow.\5\ Following each business combination the combined company 
must meet Nasdaq's requirements for initial listing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The rules also require that that each proposed business 
combination must be approved by a majority of the company's 
independent directors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq has observed that Acquisition Companies often have 
difficulty demonstrating compliance with the shareholder requirement 
for initial and continued listing.\6\ Based on conversations with 
marketplace participants, including the sponsors of Acquisition 
Companies and lawyers and bankers that advise these companies, Nasdaq 
believes these difficulties are due to the unique nature of Acquisition 
Companies, which limits the number of retail investors interested in 
the vehicle and encourages owners to hold their shares until a 
transaction is announced, as long as 3 years after their initial public 
offering. These same features, however, limit the benefit to investors 
of having a shareholder requirement. In that regard, Nasdaq notes that 
the purpose of the shareholder requirement, along with the listing 
requirements pertaining to float and market value of public float, is 
to help ensure that a stock has an investor following and liquid market 
necessary for trading.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Rule 5505(a)(3) requires at least 300 round lot holders for 
initial listing on the Capital Market. Rule 5550(a)(3) requires at 
least 300 public holders for continued listing. To date, most 
Nasdaq-listed Acquisition Companies have opted to list on the 
Capital Market.
    \7\ See, e.g., Rocky Mountain Power Company, Securities Exchange 
Act Release No, 40648 (November 9, 1998) (text at footnote 11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Given the unique nature of Acquisition Companies, however, the 
potential for distorted prices occurring as a result of there being few 
shareholders or illiquidity is less of a concern for their investors. 
During the period between its public offering and the consummation of a 
business combination, the value of an Acquisition Company is based 
primarily on the value of the funds it holds in trust, and the 
Acquisition Company's shareholders have the right to redeem their 
shares for a pro rata share of that trust in conjunction with the 
business combination. As a result, Acquisition Companies, generally, 
have historically traded close to the value in the trust, even when 
they have had few shareholders, which suggests that their lack of 
shareholders has not resulted in distorted prices and the associated 
concerns.\8\ Acquisition Companies must

[[Page 47270]]

also undergo a transformative transaction within 36 months of listing, 
at which time they must meet all listing requirements, including the 
shareholder requirement. This provides an additional protection to 
shareholders, assuring that any liquidity issues are only temporary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Nasdaq analyzed the trading history of Acquisition Companies 
listed since 2010, including those cited for non-compliance with the 
300 shareholder requirement. Nasdaq observed that shares of all 
reviewed Acquisition Companies traded, on average, close to the $10 
redemption value with the median of the average daily range equal to 
$0.07. This measure was the same for the overall group of the 
reviewed stocks, for the subset of stocks that received deficiency 
notifications for non-compliance with the 300 shareholder 
requirement, and for the remaining subset of stocks for the 
companies that were not cited for non-compliance with the 300 
shareholder requirement. Similarly, the average of each stock's 
average last price was between $9.85 and $9.96 for all three groups.
    Nasdaq also reviewed trading activity following the announcement 
by Acquisition Companies of a pending business combination with an 
operating company and observed no increase in volatility in the vast 
majority of cases. In every instance where volatility did increase 
following the announcement of a pending business combination, the 
Acquisition Company had not been cited for non-compliance with the 
300 shareholder requirement.
    Nasdaq believes that this data analysis supports a conclusion 
that trading in shares of an Acquisition Company, generally, does 
not suffer when the company has fewer shareholders than the current 
Nasdaq requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq believes that an Exchange Traded Fund (``ETF'') is somewhat 
similar to an Acquisition Company in this regard in that an arbitrage 
mechanism keeps the ETF's price close to the value of its underlying 
securities, even when trading in the ETF's shares is relatively 
illiquid. The initial listing requirements for ETFs do not include a 
shareholder requirement and only 50 shareholders are required for 
continued listing after the ETF has been listed for one year.
    For these reasons, Nasdaq proposes to reduce the shareholder 
requirement for the initial listing of an Acquisition Company on the 
Capital Market from 300 to 150 round-lot shareholders.
    Nasdaq has also observed that it can be difficult for a company, 
once listed, to obtain evidence demonstrating the number of its 
shareholders because many accounts are held in street name and 
shareholders may object to being identified to the company. As a 
result, companies must seek information from broker-dealers and from 
third-parties that distribute information such as proxy materials for 
the broker-dealers. This process is time-consuming and particularly 
burdensome for Acquisition Companies because most operating expenses 
are typically borne by the Acquisition Company's sponsors due to the 
requirement that the gross proceeds of the initial public offering 
remain in the trust account until the closing of the business 
combination.\9\ Accordingly, given the short life of an Acquisition 
Company,\10\ the trading characteristics of Acquisition Companies 
observed by Nasdaq,\11\ and the requirement to meet the initial listing 
standards at the time of the business combination, Nasdaq also proposes 
to eliminate the continued listing shareholder requirement for 
Acquisition Companies.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ While under Nasdaq's rules an Acquisition Company could pay 
operating and other expenses, subject to a limitation that 90% of 
the gross proceeds of the company's offering must be retained in 
trust account, Nasdaq understands that marketplace demands typically 
dictate that 100% of the gross proceeds from the IPO be kept in the 
trust account and that only interest earned on that account be used 
to pay taxes and limited amount of operating expenses. Marketplace 
participants have also indicated that the current trend is to allow 
interest earned to be used for payments of taxes only, thus placing 
the burden for all operating expenses on the sponsors.
    \10\ See, Footnote 4, supra.
    \11\ See, Footnote 8, supra.
    \12\ Listing Rule 5550(a)(1) requires that Acquisition Companies 
listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market will continue to have at least 
two registered and active Market Makers, one of which may be a 
Market Maker entering a stabilizing bid. As a result, Nasdaq does 
not expect that the proposed change will result in illiquidity or 
other problems trading the shares of Acquisition Companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq notes that Rule 3a51-1 under the Act \13\ defines a ``penny 
stock'' as any equity security that does not satisfy one of the 
exceptions enumerated in subparagraphs (a) through (g) under the Rule. 
If a security is a penny stock, Rules 15g-1 through 15g-9 under the Act 
\14\ impose certain additional disclosure and other requirements on 
brokers and dealers when effecting transactions in such securities. 
Rule 3a51-1(a)(2) under the Act \15\ excepts from the definition of 
penny stock securities registered on a national securities exchanges 
that have initial listing standards that meet certain requirements, 
including, in the case of primary common stock, 300 round lot holders. 
Rule 3a51-1 also includes alternative exceptions from the definition of 
penny stock. Nasdaq proposes to require that Acquisition Companies have 
$5 million in net tangible assets for initial and continued listing on 
the Nasdaq Capital Market, thereby assuring that the securities of such 
companies satisfy the exclusion from being a penny stock contained in 
Rule 3a51-1(g)(1) of the Act.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 240.3a51-1.
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.15g-1 et seq.
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.3a51-1(a)(2).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.3a51-1(g)(1). Nasdaq believes that all 
Acquisition Companies currently listed satisfy this alternative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If an Acquisition Company no longer meets the applicable net 
tangible assets requirement following initial listing, its common stock 
could become subject to the penny stock rules.\17\ Broker-dealers that 
effect recommended transactions in such securities, among other things, 
under Commission Rule 3a51-1(g), need to review current financial 
statements of the issuer to verify that the security meets the 
applicable net tangible assets or average revenue test, have a 
reasonable basis for believing they remain accurate, and preserve 
copies of those financial statements as part of its records. To 
facilitate compliance by broker-dealers, Nasdaq will monitor the 
Acquisition Companies that fail the net tangible assets test and will 
publishes on the Nasdaq Listing Center Web site a daily list of any 
such company that no longer meets the net tangible assets requirement 
of the penny stock exclusion, and which does not satisfy any other 
penny stock exclusion.\18\ Nasdaq also specifically reminds broker-
dealers of their obligations under the penny stock rules.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ The Commission has previously noted the potential for abuse 
with respect to penny stocks. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act 
Release No. 49037 (January 16, 2004), 69 FR 2531 (January 8, 2004) 
(``Our original penny stock rules reflected Congress' view that many 
of the abuses occurring in the penny stock market were caused by the 
lack of publicly available information about the market in general 
and about the price and trading volume of particular penny 
stocks'').
    \18\ https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/PennyStockList.aspx.
    \19\ In 2012, Nasdaq modified its listing requirements to add an 
alternative to the $4 minimum bid price per share requirement (the 
``Alternative Price Filing''). In approving the Alternative Price 
Filing, the Commission stated that it believed that although the 
listing of securities that do not have a blanket exclusion from the 
penny stock rules and require ongoing monitoring may increase 
compliance burdens on broker-dealers, the additional steps taken by 
Nasdaq to facilitate compliance should reduce those burdens and 
that, on balance, Nasdaq's proposal is consistent with the 
requirement of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act that the rules of an 
exchange, among other things, be designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade and, in general, to protect investors and the 
public interest. See, Exchange Act Release No. 66830 (April 18, 
2012), 77 FR 24549 (April 24, 2012) (approving SR-NASDAQ-2012-002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, if an Acquisition Company no longer meets the 
applicable net tangible assets requirement following initial listing, 
Nasdaq would initiate delisting proceedings under the Rule 5800 Series 
by sending a Staff Delisting Determination.\20\ While the Acquisition

[[Page 47271]]

Company could request review of that determination by an independent 
Hearings Panel, the Company must make disclosure about its receipt of 
the Delisting Determination and the Hearings Panel can only allow a 
company to remain listed for a maximum of 180 calendar days from the 
date of the Staff Delisting Determination.\21\ Thus, an Acquisition 
Company that became subject to the penny stock rules could remain 
listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market only for a limited time and 
investors would have notice of the pending delisting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Nasdaq also proposes to modify Listing Rule 5810(c)(1) to 
include a failure to meet the requirements of IM-5101-2 in the list 
of circumstances where Nasdaq Staff will send an immediate Staff 
Delisting Determination. This change will conform Rule 5810 with the 
language already contained in Listing Rule IM-5101-2, which states 
that ``if the Company does not meet the requirements for initial 
listing following a business combination or does not comply with one 
of the requirements [of Listing Rule IM-5101-2], Nasdaq will issue a 
Staff Delisting Determination under Rule 5810 to delist the 
Company's securities.''
    \21\ See, Rule 5815(c)(1). A company could also request review 
of a Panel decision by the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing Review 
Council; however, the Panel decision is generally effective 
immediately and is not stayed even if the company does appeal. See, 
Rules 5815(d)(1) and 5820(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Last, Nasdaq notes that the existing rules require that following a 
business combination with an Acquisition Company, the resulting company 
must satisfy all initial listing requirements. The rule does not 
provide a timetable for the company to demonstrate that it satisfies 
those requirements, however. In order to assure that any company that 
does not satisfy the initial listing requirements following a business 
combination enters the delisting process promptly, Nasdaq proposes to 
codify that a company must demonstrate that it meets the initial 
listing requirements within 30 days following a business combination. 
If the company has not demonstrated that it meets the requirements for 
initial listing in that time, Nasdaq staff would issue a Delisting 
Determination, which the company could appeal to an independent 
Hearings Panel as described in the Nasdaq Rule 5800 Series.
    Nasdaq also proposes to delete a duplicative paragraph from the 
rule text and separate certain provisions into new paragraphs to 
enhance the readability of the rule.
    These proposed changes will be effective upon approval of this rule 
by the Commission. However, Nasdaq will permit Acquisition Companies, 
if any, that were listed on the Capital Market before this proposal was 
approved and that have less than $5 million net tangible assets to 
remain listed, provided that such a company must continue to comply 
with the 300 public holder requirement for continued listing.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See, Footnote 16, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act,\23\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act,\24\ which requires that the rules of an exchange 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to 
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national 
market system and, in general, protect investors and the public 
interest. While the change would allow Acquisition Companies to list 
with fewer shareholders, this proposed change is consistent with the 
investor protection provisions of the Act because other protections 
help assure that market prices will not be distorted by any potential 
resulting lack of liquidity, which is the underlying purpose of the 
shareholder requirement. In particular, the ability of a shareholder to 
redeem shares for a pro rata share of the trust helps assure that the 
Acquisition Company will trade close to the value of the assets held in 
trust.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \25\ See, Footnote 8, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change will also continue to assure that any 
listed Acquisition Company satisfies an exclusion from the definition 
of a ``penny stock'' under the Act by imposing a new requirement that 
an Acquisition Company must maintain $5 million of net tangible assets. 
Further, following listing Nasdaq will monitor the company and publish 
on its Web site if the company no longer satisfies those additional 
requirements or any of the other exclusions from being a penny stock 
contained in Rule 3a51-1 under the Securities Act of 1933.
    Thus, this change will remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market by removing listing requirements 
that prohibit certain companies from listing or remaining listed 
without any concomitant investor protection benefits. In addition, the 
change would also limit the amount of time that an Acquisition Company 
could remain listed following a business combination if it has not 
demonstrated compliance with the initial listing requirements, thereby 
enhancing investor protection. Accordingly, Nasdaq believes that the 
proposal satisfies the Exchange Act requirements.
    Finally, Nasdaq does not believe that this change affecting only 
Acquisition Companies should affect the designation in Rule 146(b) 
under the Securities Act \26\ of securities listed on the Nasdaq 
Capital Market as ``Covered Securities,'' exempt from state 
registration requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 230.146(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 1996, Congress amended Section 18 of the Securities Act to 
exempt from state registration requirements securities listed, or 
authorized for listing, on the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE''), 
the American Stock Exchange LLC (now known as NYSE American LLC), or 
the National Market System of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``the Nasdaq 
Global Market'') (collectively, the ``Named Markets''), or any national 
securities exchange designated by the Commission as having 
``substantially similar'' listing standards to those of the Named 
Markets.\27\ The securities listed on these markets are defined in 
Section 18 as ``Covered Securities.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See, National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, 
Public Law 104-290, 110 Stat. 3416 (October 11, 1996), adopting 
Section 18 of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. 77r(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 2007, the Commission amended Rule 146(b) to designate securities 
listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market as Covered Securities.\28\ After 
careful comparison, the Commission concluded that the listing standards 
of the Nasdaq Capital Market were substantially similar to the listing 
standards of NYSE American.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See, Securities Act Release No. 8791 (April 18, 2007), 72 
FR 20410 (April 24, 2007).
    \29\ At the time, NYSE American was known as NYSE MKT. When 
determining that Nasdaq Capital Market securities are Covered 
Securities, the Commission did not specifically discuss Nasdaq's 300 
round lot requirement for initial listing nor the difference between 
this requirement NYSE MKT's 400 public holder requirement. However, 
in determining to treat securities listed on the BATS Exchange, Inc. 
(``BATS'') as Covered Securities, the Commission reviewed the BATS 
listing standards, which are identical to Nasdaq's, and stated that 
this difference does not preclude ``a determination of substantial 
similarity between the standards.'' Securities Act Release No. 9295 
(January 20, 2012), 77 FR 3590 (January 25, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When the Commission expanded Rule 146(b) to include the Nasdaq 
Capital Market, it compared the listing requirements of the Named 
Markets to those of the Capital Market for common stock, secondary 
classes of common stock and preferred stocks, convertible debt, 
warrants, index warrants and units.\30\ At the time, no other 
securities were listed on the Capital Market, including Exchange Traded 
Products or Acquisition Companies. When the Commission later expanded 
Rule 146(b) to also include securities listed on BATS, it also 
separately considered BATS' listing requirements for other securities 
including Exchange Traded Funds, Portfolio Depository Receipts

[[Page 47272]]

and Index Fund Shares.\31\ Thus, the Commission has recognized that it 
is appropriate to create different listing standards for different 
categories of companies and that such differences do not preclude the 
Commission from finding those securities are Covered Securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See, Securities Act Release No. 8791 (April 18, 2007), 72 
FR 20410 (April 24, 2007).
    \31\ See, Securities Act Release No. 9251 (August 8, 2011), 76 
FR 49698 (August 11, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq notes that it is not proposing to reduce the shareholder 
requirement for operating companies listed on the Nasdaq Capital 
Market. The proposed change affects only the separate listing 
requirements for Acquisition Companies, which were adopted because 
Nasdaq viewed Acquisition Companies as presenting different risks than 
operating companies and created listing requirements designed to 
address those risks. Similarly, and as described above, just as Nasdaq 
believes Acquisition Companies have unique risks, other facets of their 
structure and the requirements of Nasdaq's rules for Acquisition 
Companies minimize the need for a shareholder requirement. As described 
above, the Commission has previously concluded that categories of 
securities differing from common stock of operating companies can be 
Covered Securities, even though such securities are subject to lower 
listing requirements. Nasdaq believes that, here, the earlier decision 
to regulate Acquisition Companies listed on the Capital Market under 
the quantitative requirements of the Rule 5500 Series should not 
preclude the decision now to adopt a lower minimum shareholder 
requirement for Acquisition Companies, which are a unique category of 
securities, nor should it affect the designation of securities listed 
on the Capital Market as Covered Securities so long as the other 
investor protection requirements of the Act are satisfied. As described 
above, Nasdaq believes such investor protection requirements are 
satisfied. Moreover, preventing Nasdaq from making this change for the 
Capital Market would create the perverse, anti-competitive result that 
the Named Markets (including the Nasdaq Global Market) would be allowed 
to make this change, or any change, but that the markets identified in 
Rule 146(b) could never innovate and could only copy the changes made 
by the Named Markets [sic].

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. While the rule may permit more 
Acquisition Companies to list, or remain listed, on Nasdaq, other 
exchanges could adopt similar rules to compete for such listings.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve 
or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings 
to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eb999e878ec6888486868e859f98ab988e88c58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8cacdd4dd95dbd7d5d5ddd6cccbf8cbdddb96dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include 
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2017-087 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2017-087. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2017-087 and should 
be submitted on or before November 1, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-21814 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>