alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant                           ( print page 45602)                        applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; NIH Pathways to Independence Award (K99/R00) Review.                    

*Date:*                         November 15, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Gateway Plaza, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 533, Bethesda, MD 20814 (Telepresence).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Richard C. Palmer, DRPH, Health Scientist Administrator, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20906, (301) 451-2432,                         *richard.palmer@nih.gov.*

Dated: September 25, 2017.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-20860 Filed 9-28-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamerson Devoir TILLMAN, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Tillman, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 10-7499, 10-7501.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 31, 2011.

Decided: April 6, 2011.

Jamerson Devoir Tillman, James Tillman, Appellants Pro Se. Stuart A. Ber-man, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

*290Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamerson Devoir Tillman and James Tillman seek to appeal their convictions and sentences. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within fourteen days after the entry of judgment. Fed. RApp. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); *United States v. Reyes,*759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered the judgments on September 25, 2001. The notices of appeal were filed on October 25, 2010. Because Jamerson Tillman and James Tillman failed to file timely notices of appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence A. Denton, President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Lawrence A. Denton
    ------------------
Lawrence A. Denton
President,
Chief Executive Officer and
Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
August 6, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Harvey, Appellant.

[987 NYS2d 175]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 26, 2000 *(People v Harvey,*278 AD2d 511 [2000]), affirming two judgments of the County Court, Rockland County, both rendered December 22, 1998.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Dillon, J.E, Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Medirisk, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 
333-28541 and No. 333-63313) on Form S-8 of Medirisk, Inc. of our reports dated 
February 5, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Medirisk, Inc. 
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated 
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for 
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and the 
related consolidated financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the 
1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Medirisk, Inc.

                                                        /s/ KPMG LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 30, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         927314
<NAME>                        BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              12,924
<SECURITIES>                                       223,848
<RECEIVABLES>                                       13,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,752
<INVENTORY>                                         72,739
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   416,239
<PP&E>                                             259,680
<DEPRECIATION>                                      64,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     829,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              133,131
<BONDS>                                            563,946
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1
<OTHER-SE>                                          89,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       829,677
<SALES>                                            944,629
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   944,629
<CGS>                                              682,855
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      682,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  43,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     45,650
<INCOME-TAX>                                        17,803
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 27,847
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        27,847
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
1

The HONORABLE RALPH R. ERICKSON, United States District Judge for

the District of North Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-3641

___________

David Meador, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * District of North Dakota.

*

Dan Anderson; Gene Bjerke, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 30, 2010

Filed: May 6, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

David Meador appeals from the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a deputy sheriff and the sheriff of

Barnes County, North Dakota, alleging that he was subject to an unlawful arrest in

violation of his constitutional rights. Upon de novo review, we conclude that

summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. See

Pearson v. Callahan, 129 S. Ct. 808, 815-16 (2009) (qualified immunity); Thomas v.

Dickel, 213 F.3d 1023, 1026 (8th Cir. 2000) (a failure-to-train claim cannot stand
-2-

unless there is liability on an underlying substantive claim). Accordingly, we affirm.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
BioSource International, Inc.:

The audits referred to in our report dated March 26, 1999, included the related
financial statement schedules as of December 31, 1998, and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, included in the annual report
on Form 10-K of BioSource International, Inc. This financial statement schedule
is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits. In
our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to
the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-
65562 and 33-91838) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-05391) on Form S-3 of our report
dated March 26, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of BioSource
International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998,
which report appears in the December 31, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K of
BioSource International, Inc.

                                                   KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
April 14, 1999
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ERIC ANDRE W

O’ DELL, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. JOHN M UNGER , Floor Offic e r; G. B ADILLA, Floor Offic e r, De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-55702 D.C . No. 3:11-c v-02181-W QHB GS M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia W illia m Q. Ha y e s, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2014 ** B e fore : C LIFTON, B EA, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. C a lifornia sta te prisone r Eric Andre w O’ De ll a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismi ssing for fa ilure to e xha ust his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging e xc e ssive forc e and othe r c la im s. W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . 

# FIL ED MAY30 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).§ 1291. W e re vie wde novo, Sapp v . K imbre ll , 623 F.3d 813, 821 (9th C ir. 2010), and we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly c onc lude d tha

t O’ De ll fa ile d to e xha

ust his a dm inistra

tive re m e die s be c a

use O’ De ll did not exha

ust his grieva

n c e s to thefina l le ve l of re vie w in a

tim e l y m anne r, or e sta

blish tha t he should bee xc use d from the e xha ustion re quire m e nt. Se eW oodford v . N

go , 548 U.S. 81, 88, 93 (2006) (Prison Litiga tion R e form

Ac t re quire s “prope r e xha ustion,”whic h m e ans c om ple ting the a dm inistra

tive re vie w proc e s s in c om plia nc e with a ll re le va

nt de a dline s a

nd othe r a pplic a ble proc e dura l rule s); Sapp , 623 F.3d a t 818 (se tting forth ad

m inistra tive e xha ustion proc e ss unde r re le va nt C a lifornia

re gula tions); N une z v . Dunc an , 591 F.3d 1217, 1224, 1226 (9th C ir. 2010) (whe re de fe nda nt e sta blishe s fa ilure to e xha ust, burde n shifts to pla

intiff to provetha

t a d m inistra t ive re m e die s we re una va ila ble to him

). O’ De ll’ s c onte ntions re ga rding de fe nda

nts’ a lle ge d m issta

t e m e nt of fa c ts and e vide nc e , the distric t c ourt’ s a lle ge d fa ilure to re vie w his a rgum e nts a

nd e xhibits, a

nd the a lle ge d ly

e rrone ous dismissa l of his da m a ge s c la im s a ga inst de fe nda nts in the i r individual c a

pa c ity , a re unpe rsua sive .

1 3 - 5 5 7 0 2 2O’ De ll’ s re que s t for “ a ll prope r, just a nd e quita ble re lie f ava ila

ble ,” file d on Nove m be r 15, 2013, is den ie d a s m oot. AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 5 5 7 0 2 3
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                        BRISTOL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
                          Computation of Loss per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         (Successor)           (Predecessor)
                                                                           Three Months Ended March 31
                                                                          ----------------------------------
                                                                              1997                  1996
                                                                          ------------         -------------
<S>                                                                       <C>                   <C>
PRIMARY LOSS PER SHARE
      Net loss                                                             $  (434,986)         $   (16,826)
                                                                           ===========          ===========
      Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
         during the period                                                   4,745,654                1,001
      Effect of stock options and warrants treated as common 
         stock equivalents under the treasury stock method                          --                   --
                                                                           -----------          -----------
           Total shares                                                      4,745,654                1,001
                                                                           ===========          ===========
Primary loss per share                                                     $     (0.09)         $    (16.81)
                                                                           ===========          ===========

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
      Net loss                                                             $  (434,986)         $   (16,826)
                                                                           ===========          ===========
      Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
        during the period                                                    4,745,654                1,001
      Effect of stock options and warrants treated as common
        stock equivalents under the treasury stock method                           --                   --
                                                                           -----------          -----------
           Total shares                                                      4,745,654                1,001
                                                                           ===========          ===========
Fully diluted loss per share                                               $     (0.09)         $    (16.81)
                                                                           ===========          ===========
</TABLE>

                                  Page 14 of 15
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael J. Pellegrino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




                                                  /s/ Michael J. Pellegrino
                                                  -------------------------
                                                  Michael J. Pellegrino
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  April 15, 2003
Exhibit 8.1
 List of Main Subsidiaries
 Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction
    
    Usual NameEndesa Inversiones Generales S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    EnigesaEmpresa de Ingeniería Ingendesa S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    IngendesaEmpresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    PehuencheEmpresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    PangueHidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.
    
    Argentina
    
    El ChocónEndesa Costanera S.A.
    
    Argentina
    
    Endesa CostaneraSociedad Concesionaria Túnel El Melón S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    Túnel El MelónCompañía Eléctrica Cono Sur S.A.
    
    Panama
    
    Cono SurEmgesa S.A. E.S.P.
    
    Colombia
    
    EmgesaEdegel S.A.
    
    Peru
    
    EdegelCompañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    San IsidroCompañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    CeltaEndesa Eco S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    Endesa EcoCentral Eólica Canela S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    Canela
#### DICAM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (Doing Business as Verizon Wireless), Defendant-Appellee, and AT&T Mobility LLC (Formerly known as Cingular Wireless, LLC), Sprint Spectrum, LP, and Nextel Operations, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Personal Communications Devices, LLC (Formerly known as Utstarcom), Defendant-Appellee, and Palm, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2011-1034.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 16, 2011.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the joint motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal without prejudice.

It Is Ordered That:

*994(1) The motion is granted.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="sjh">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-04-15T14:48:20Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-04-15T14:48:21Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-04-15T14:48:21Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="14279">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="sjh">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-04-15T14:48:20Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPINION # o- 105 WAS NEVER ISSUED OH 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>