alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0160

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

T.K.,

 A Youth in Need of Care.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Jon A. Oldenburg, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 11 2020

11/12/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0160
#### David A. SMITH, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2010-7001.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 25, 2011.

*962Edward R. Reines, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, Mark G. Davis, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Washington, DC, Amalie M. Weber, Ne-tapp, Inc., Vienna, VA, for Claimant-Appellant.

Tara K. Hogan, Department of Justice, David J. Barrans, Michael J. Timinski, Y. Ken Lee, Amanda R. Blackmon, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

RADER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves without opposition to vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and to remand for further proceedings.

The appellant filed a notice of appeal with the Court of Veterans Claims more than 120 days after the Board of Veterans’ Appeals mailed its decision in his case. That court dismissed the appeal as untimely, concluding that the 120-day appeal period established by 38 U.S.C. § 7266(a) for seeking review of Board of Veterans’ Appeals decisions is jurisdictional and not subject to equitable tolling. The appellant sought this court’s review.

This court stayed the briefing schedule in this appeal pending the United States Supreme Court’s review of our decision in *Henderson v. Shinseki,*589 F.3d 1201 (Fed.Cir.2009) (en banc) (affirming Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims determination that period to appeal to that court is not subject to equitable tolling). In *Henderson ex rel. Henderson v. Shinseki,*— U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1197, 179 L.Ed.2d 159 (2011), the Supreme Court reversed this court’s decision and concluded that the 120-day deadline for filing an appeal with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims does not have jurisdictional consequences. Because the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims erred in concluding that the appeal deadline established by § 7266(a) is jurisdictional, we vacate the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE UNAUDITED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 IN THE REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 OF BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS,
INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          49,768
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,320,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                   312,043
<INVENTORY>                                  3,419,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,205,042
<PP&E>                                       1,140,716
<DEPRECIATION>                                 683,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,199,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,219,790
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,050,000
<COMMON>                                         8,227
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,817,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,199,793
<SALES>                                     17,628,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,628,224
<CGS>                                       14,255,565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,900,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (36,546)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,452
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             356,128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,646,886)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                               (233,796)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,880,682)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2

AS OF JULY 01, 2014

                                 LEASE AGREEMENT

TERAFOX  CORP.  has signed the lease  agreement  with  SERGEY  PELOVSKI,  Sofia,
Bulgaria as of JULY 01, 2014,  where we intent to set up our printing  machines.
Material terms of agreement are as following:

1. Leased premises area covers  approximately  40 (forty) square meters.  Leased
premises are located on the first floor of the  building at 19  YAKUBITSA  STR.,
SOFIA 1164, BULGARIA.

2. Term of  Agreement  is two (2) years,  starting  FEBRUARY 01, 2015 and ending
FEBRUARY 01, 2017.

3. TERAFOX CORP is given an option to renew the Lease for an additional  term of
two (2) years by giving the lesser  written  notice on ninety  (90) days  before
expiration  of the primary term of this lease.  The renewal  lease is to be upon
the same terms and conditions contained in the primary Lease Agreement,  besides
rental fee as provided in Paragraph 5 of the Agreement.

4. For the first year of the Agreement the annual rental fee is $6,000.

5. For the second and third year of the  Agreement the annual rental fee will be
$5,400.

6. Default  interest of $10 per day shall be paid as additional  payment for any
rental fee delivered or received more than three (3) days after the first day of
any calendar month during the term of this lease.

7. Lesser agrees to provide at his expense for the premises electricity,  water,
air conditioning,  ventilation,  light tubes replacement,  trash removal service
and sewage disposal service in such quantities and at such times as is necessary
to Lessee's comfortable and reasonable use of the premises.

8. Any holding  over after the  expiration  of the lease term shall be deemed to
constitute a tenancy from month to month only and shall be on the same terms and
conditions as specified in this Lease Agreement.

On behalf of the Lessee                             On behalf of the Lesser


/s/ Aleksey Gagauz                                  /s/ Sergey Pelovski
----------------------------                        ----------------------------
Aleksey Gagauz, Terafox Corp                        Sergey Pelovski
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21640]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3388-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Seminole Tribe of Florida; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an 
Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the Seminole Tribe of Florida (FEMA-3388-EM), dated September 8, 2017, 
and related determinations.

DATES: The amendment was issued on September 18, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Willie G. Nunn, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this emergency.
    This action terminates the appointment of Just[oacute] 
Hern[aacute]ndez as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-21640 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### Michelle M. Meehan, Respondent, v John J. Meehan, Appellant.

[665 NYS2d 591]

—In an action for a divorce and ancil*351lary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated June 13, 1996, as granted that branch of the plaintiff’s cross motion which was for an award of pendente lite attorneys’ fees, and (2) an order of the same court, dated January 29, 1997, as (a) upon reargument, adhered to so much of the prior determination as granted the plaintiff’s cross motion for an award of pendente lite attorneys’ fees, (b) granted the plaintiff’s cross motion for additional pendente lite attorneys’ fees, and (c) denied his motion to disqualify the plaintiff’s attorney.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 13, 1996, is dismissed, as that order is superseded by the order dated January 29, 1997, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated January 29, 1997, is modified by (1) deleting the provision thereof which, upon reargument, adhered to so much of the prior determination as granted that branch of the plaintiff’s cross motion which was for an award of pendente lite attorneys’ fees and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the plaintiff’s cross motion, and vacating the provision of the order dated June 13, 1996, which granted that branch of the plaintiff’s cross motion which was for an award of pendente lite attorneys’ fees, and (2) deleting the provision thereof which granted the plaintiff’s cross motion for additional pendente lite attorneys’ fees and substituting therefor a provision denying the plaintiff’s cross motion for additional pendente lite attorney fees; as so modified, the order dated January 29, 1997, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The parties’ antenuptial agreement, which the plaintiff did not seek to invalidate, precludes the award of pendente lite attorneys’ fees (see, *Demis v Demis,*168 AD2d 840; *see also, Avitzur v Avitzur,*58 NY2d 108; *Christian v Christian,*42 NY2d 63, 71).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 22, 2012

s1015 

# Order

October 22, 2012

145303

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145303

COA: 306919

Wayne CC: 08

- 011715

- FC

KEITH ADIR CARTER, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

JODI A. SCHWENDIMANN , FKA JODI A. DALVEY
, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant

- Cross

- Appellant

COOLER CONCEPTS, INC
., Counterclaim Defendant

- Cross

- Appellant

v.

ARKWRIGHT ADVANCED C OATING, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant

- Appellant

______________________

2018

- 2416, 2019

- 1012

______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in No. 0:11

- cv

- 00820

- JRT

- HB, Judge John R. Tunheim.

______________________

O R D E R

______________________

Before O’M ALLEY
, R EYNA
, and W ALLACH
, Circuit Judges.

P ER C URIAM

.Before the court is the parties’ May 7, 2020, joint response to the Order to Show Cause. The parties have agreed there is no need for redactions. Accordingly, Case: 18-2416 Document: 64 Page: 1 Filed: 05/13/2020SCHWENDIMANN v. ARKWRIGHT ADVANCED COATING 2

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The opinion issued under seal on May 5, 2020 is hereby unsealed.

F OR THE C OURT

May 13, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 18-2416 Document: 64 Page: 2 Filed: 05/13/2020
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION
 OF PERIODIC REPORT

As
 adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
 connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter ended December 31, 2007 of Integrated BioPharma,
 Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
 Dina L. Masi, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. certifies,
 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:

| | (1) | the
 Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This
 certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
 extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement has been provided to
 the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
 request.

|Date:February 19,
2008 |  | By: /s/ Dina L. Masi                                    
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | Name: Dina L. Masi                                      
|                       |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                      EQUITY GENERAL PARTNER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert McKinney, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of National Property Analysts
Master Limited Partnership;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2005

By: Feldman International Inc., its equity general partner

By: /s/ Robert McKinney
    ---------------------
    Name: Robert McKinney
    Title:   President
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                      CONSENT OF COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Alabama National BanCorporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-07951) of our report
dated January 15, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedules of Alabama National BanCorporation as of
December 31, 1996 and 1994, and for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1994,
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
                                ----------------------------
                                COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P. 


Birmingham, Alabama
March 26, 1997









                                        1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Diversified Futures
                    Trust I and is qualified in its entirety 
                    by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          

<CIK>               0000926805
<NAME>              Diversified Futures Trust I
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1996

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1996

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1996

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          79,506,881

<SECURITIES>                    1,513,343

<RECEIVABLES>                   20,607

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                81,040,831

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  81,040,831

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           9,549,318

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      71,491,513

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    81,040,831

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                24,485,692

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                9,375,672

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    15,110,020

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   36.56

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0


</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2675 

To amend title II of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and Reform 

Act of 2004 to extend the operation of such title for a 1-year period 

ending June 22, 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2009 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia (for himself, Mr. COBLE, Mr. CONYERS, and Mr. 

SMITH of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and Reform Act of 2004 to extend the operation 

of such title for a 1-year period ending June 22, 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Antitrust Criminal 

5 Penalty Enhancement and Reform Act of 2004 Extension 

6 Act’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2675 IH

1 SEC. 2. DELAY OF SUNSET. 

2 Section 211(a) of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty En3 hancement and Reform Act of 2004 (15 U.S.C. 1 note) 

4 is amended by striking ‘‘5 years’’ and inserting ‘‘6 years’’. 

5 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT. 

6 The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect 

7 immediately before June 22, 2009. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS