alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3062 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3062

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on bitolylene diisocyanate 
                                (TODI).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2009

 Ms. Shea-Porter introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on bitolylene diisocyanate 
                                (TODI).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BITOLYLENE DIISOCYANATE (TODI).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.01 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to bitolylene diisocyanate 
(TODI)) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/
2012''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2862 

To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to provide 

education and resources to small business concerns that assist such 

concerns to protect themselves from phishing, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2009 

Mr. SPACE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Small Business 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to provide education and resources to small business concerns that assist such concerns to protect themselves from phishing, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROVISION OF EDUCATION AND RESOURCES 

4 TO SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS WITH RE5 SPECT TO PHISHING. 

6 The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) is 

7 amended— 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2862 IH

1 (1) by redesignating section 44 as section 45; 

2 and 

3 (2) by inserting after section 43 the following: 

4 ‘‘SEC. 44. PROVISION OF EDUCATION AND RESOURCES TO 

5 SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS WITH RESPECT 

6 TO PHISHING. 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall estab8 lish and carry out a program to provide education and 

9 resources to small business concerns that assist such con10 cerns to— 

11 ‘‘(1) understand the dangers of and identify 

12 phishing; 

13 ‘‘(2) train employees to understand the dangers 

14 of and identify phishing; and 

15 ‘‘(3) determine methods to protect such con16 cerns from phishing. 

17 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION OF PHISHING.—In this section, the 

18 term ‘phishing’ means the use by any person of a Web 

19 page, electronic mail message, or otherwise through use 

20 of the Internet, to solicit, request, or take any action to 

21 induce another person to provide identifying information 

22 by representing itself to be a business without the author23 ity or approval of the business.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### Carroway Luxury Homes, LLC, Respondent, v Integra Supply Corporation, Appellant.

[859 NYS2d 834]

*1188Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John C. Cherundolo, J.), entered July 31, 2007. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted those parts of plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on liability and to strike the amended answer with the exception of the first affirmative defense.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied in its entirety and the amended answer is reinstated in its entirety.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for “construction delays and business expenses” that arose when a forklift rented by plaintiff from defendant rolled over while being operated by plaintiffs subcontractor. Defendant interposed affirmative defenses asserting, inter alia, that the damages sought by plaintiff are consequential and are therefore barred by the written rental agreement; that defendant did not represent to plaintiff that the forklift was fit for the use intended by plaintiff; and that any damages are the result of the reckless operation of the equipment by plaintiffs subcontractor. Defendant also asserted counterclaims seeking, inter alia, the cost of repairing the forklift. It is undisputed that defendant sold the forklift before plaintiff was able to examine it, and plaintiff thus moved, inter alia, to strike defendant’s amended answer, which included affirmative defenses and counterclaims, and for partial summary judgment on liability and sanctions based on defendant’s alleged intentional spoliation of evidence. Supreme Court granted those parts of the motion for partial summary judgment on liability and to strike the amended answer, with the exception of the first affirmative defense. We conclude that the court abused its discretion in granting those parts of plaintiffs motion before the parties had engaged in discovery.

“[Striking a pleading is a drastic sanction to impose in the absence of willful or contumacious conduct [and we conclude that it is premature] to determine whether such drastic relief is necessary as a matter of fundamental fairness” *(Iannucci v Rose,*8 AD3d 437, 438 [2004]; *see Wetzler v Sisters of Charity Hosp.,*17 AD3d 1088, 1089 [2005]). Indeed, the record is insufficient to determine whether the unavailability of the forklift for examination will “deprive the plaintiff of the means to prove [its] case” or to establish its defenses to the counterclaims *(Ian*
      *1189
      *nucci,*8 AD3d at 438), and thus less severe sanctions may be appropriate. We therefore note that plaintiff may renew its motion after the completion of discovery. Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Smith, Fahey and Gorski, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1
 EQUITY GENERAL PARTNER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 I, Edward B. Lipkin, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of National Property Analysts Master Limited
Partnership;
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:
    
    March 27, 2009By:
    
    EBL&S, Inc., its managing general partnerBy:
    
    /s/ Edward B. Lipkin
Name:
Edward B. LipkinTitle: President
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2942 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2942

 To appropriate to the Highway Trust Fund the unobligated balances of 
 funds made available by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 
                                 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2009

     Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida (for himself, Mr. Coble, Mr. 
   Westmoreland, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Mr. Schock, Mr. Nunes, Mr. 
 Johnson of Illinois, Mr. Cao, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, and 
 Mr. Platts) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To appropriate to the Highway Trust Fund the unobligated balances of 
 funds made available by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 
                                 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Highway Trust Fund Reclamation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. APPROPRIATION OF UNOBLIGATED STIMULUS FUNDS TO HIGHWAY TRUST 
              FUND.

    (a) Rescissions.--Effective on July 15, 2009, any unobligated 
balances available on such date of funds made available by division A 
of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-
5), other than under the heading ``Federal Highway Administration--
Highway Infrastructure Investment'' in title XII of such division (123 
Stat. 106), are rescinded.
    (b) Appropriation to Highway Trust Fund.--Effective on July 15, 
2009, there is appropriated to the Highway Trust Fund established by 
section 9503 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, out of money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the total amount rescinded by 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### Quality Leasing & Management Corp., Appellant, v American Arbitration Association, Respondent.

[665 NYS2d 858]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered on July 3, 1996, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the cross-motion and to reinstate the complaint, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The evidence tending to prove that plaintiff fraudulently obtained its contract to supply computer equipment to defendant consisted of proof of certain payments made by plaintiff to a company known as DF Systems, Inc. (DF). Questions of fact remain as to whether plaintiff was aware that that company was controlled by defendant’s former employee, Inez DeFonseca, who negotiated the contract on defendant’s behalf and who has since been convicted of criminal bank fraud charges as a result of her involvement in a bribery and kickback scheme, and as to whether plaintiff received any services from DF in exchange for the payments.

Under these circumstances, while the circumstantial evidence of bribery may be strong, we cannot say at this juncture that there are no material issues of fact so as to warrant summary judgment. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2971 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2971

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 630 Northeast Killingsworth Avenue in Portland, Oregon, as the ``Dr. 
                 Martin Luther King, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 630 Northeast Killingsworth Avenue in Portland, Oregon, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Martin 
Luther King, Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32



Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

And 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Elton Alderman, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Prolong International Corporation (the Company), and Thomas C. Billstein, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, each certifies, pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a or 15d of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                                                               
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 21, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Elton Alderman                                            
|                         |  |  |  | Elton Alderman, Chairman, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer
|                         |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                 
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 21, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas C. Billstein                                       
|                         |  |  |  | Thomas C. Billstein, Chief Operating Officer                  
|                         |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Filed 9/3/24 P. v. Villasana CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions 

not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion 

has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

 Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

GUILLERMO ANTONIO 

VILLASANA III,

 Defendant and Appellant.

2d Crim. No. B332109

(Super. Ct. No. 21F-04639)

(San Luis Obispo County)

In 2021, Guillermo Antonio Villasana III went wine tasting 

in Paso Robles with J.R. The two then had drinks in a hotel bar 

before going to dinner at a local restaurant. After they began 

arguing at the restaurant, J.R. decided to walk back to the hotel. 

An upset Villasana arrived a few minutes after J.R. and punched 

her several times in the face. 

A jury convicted Villasana of domestic violence. (Pen. 

Code, § 273.5, subd. (a).) The trial court suspended imposition of 

sentence and placed Villasana on three years of formal probation. 

It also ordered him to serve 364 days in county jail.
2

We appointed counsel to represent Villasana in this appeal. 

After counsel examined the record, he filed an opening brief that 

raises no arguable issues. On July 31, 2024, we advised 

Villasana that he had until August 23, 2024, to submit any 

contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We have not 

received a response.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that 

Villasana’s attorney fully complied with his responsibilities and 

that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 

436, 441.) 

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

BALTODANO, J.

We concur:

YEGAN, Acting P. J.

CODY, J.
Jacquelyn H. Duffy, Judge

Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo

______________________________

Micah Reyner, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, 

for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21315]



[[Page 46343]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 10153]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: ``Fran[ccedil]ois Morellet'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that two objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Fran[ccedil]ois Morellet,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign 
owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of 
the exhibit objects at the Dia Art Foundation, New York, New York, from 
on or about October 28, 2017, until on or about June 2, 2018, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office of the 
Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87f4e2e4f3eee8e9b5b3b2bec7f4f3e6f3e2a9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f4879197809d9b9ac6c0c1cdb48780958091da939b82">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. Department 
of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of 
December 11, 2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
determinations be published in the Federal Register.

Alyson Grunder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-21315 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>