alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Jay S. Wintrob, Chief Executive Officer of First SunAmerica Life Insurance Company, certifythat:
1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of First SunAmerica Life Insurance Company; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b)  [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Date:     April 15, 2005                     
/s/ JAY S. WINTROB
<PAGE>

                          A.S.V., Inc. and Subsidiary
                Exhibit 11 - Computation of Earnings per Share
                 Years Ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     1999          1998         1997
                                                  -----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                               <C>           <C>          <C>
Basic
 Earnings
  Net income                                       $1,412,053   $3,366,055   $2,323,557
                                                   ==========   ==========   ==========

 Shares
  Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding                               9,586,032    7,764,504    7,366,117
                                                   ==========   ==========   ==========

 Earnings per common share                         $      .15   $      .43   $     . 32
                                                   ==========   ==========   ==========

Diluted
 Earnings
  Net income                                       $1,412,053   $3,366,055   $2,323,557
  Add after tax interest expense applicable
   to 6.5% convertible debentures                           -      233,188      206,700
                                                   ----------   ----------   ----------
 Net income applicable to common stock             $1,412,053   $3,599,243   $2,530,257
                                                   ==========   ==========   ==========

 Shares
  Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding                               9,586,032    7,764,504    7,366,117
  Assuming exercise of options and warrants
   reduced by the number of shares which could
   have been purchased with the proceeds from
   the exercise of such options and warrants          355,584      647,012      852,716
  Assuming conversion of 6.5% convertible
   debentures                                               -      603,997      681,818
                                                  -----------   ----------   ----------

  Weighted average number of common and
   common equivalent shares outstanding             9,941,616    9,015,513    8,900,651
                                                   ==========   ==========   ==========

 Earnings per common share                         $      .14   $      .40   $      .28
                                                   ==========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND THE UNAUDITED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 IN THE REPORT ON FORM
10-QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 OF BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS,
INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         396,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,080,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                   372,720
<INVENTORY>                                  4,710,967
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,405,482
<PP&E>                                       1,464,832
<DEPRECIATION>                                 660,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,288,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,307,523
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    400,000
<COMMON>                                         6,968
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,330,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,288,101
<SALES>                                     27,501,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,501,352
<CGS>                                       18,720,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,640,621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (23,888)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             394,884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (510,265)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (514,423)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter ended September 30, 2010 of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Dina L. Masi, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Integrated BioPharma, Inc.certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to her knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
November 15, 2010
By: /s/ Dina L. Masi Dina L. Masi, Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2723 

To amend the Social Security Act to provide for an exemption to allow 

an individual otherwise ineligible to travel outside the United States 

to do so for employment purposes to pay child support arrearages, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2009 

Mr. GERLACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Social Security Act to provide for an exemption to allow an individual otherwise ineligible to travel 

outside the United States to do so for employment purposes to pay child support arrearages, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2723 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS TO 

2 TRAVEL OVERSEAS FOR EMPLOYMENT TO 

3 PAY CHILD SUPPORT ARREARAGES. 

4 Section 452(k) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 652(k)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘The Sec7 retary’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in para8 graph (4), the Secretary’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

10 paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(4)(A) In accordance with subparagraph (B), 

12 the Secretary of State, in the Secretary’s discretion, 

13 may exempt from the restrictions described in para14 graph (2) an individual who would otherwise be sub15 ject to such restrictions if the Secretary determines, 

16 on a case-by-case basis, that such exemption is ap17 propriate to allow such individual to travel outside 

18 the United States for the purpose of employment to 

19 pay the arrearages referred to in paragraph (1). 

20 ‘‘(B) In making a determination regarding an 

21 exemption under subparagraph (A), such individual 

22 shall submit to the Secretary a written offer of em23 ployment from the overseas employer and shall post 

24 security sufficient to satisfy the arrearages at issue. 

25 The Secretary shall determine if such offer is bona 

26 fide and shall consider the amount of the arrearages 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2723 IH

1 at issue, any ongoing support obligation, and wheth2 er such individual presents a risk of flight. The Sec3 retary may also take into consideration any other 

4 factors the Secretary considers relevant or appro5 priate in making such a determination. The Sec6 retary may at any time reimpose on such individual 

7 the restrictions described in paragraph (2) if the 

8 Secretary determines that such is appropriate.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Gretchen Owens, Appellant, v Stanley J. Wollmers, Respondent.

[665 NYS2d 682]

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), entered October 8, 1996, as granted the father’s objections to so much of an order of the same court (Rodriguez, H.E.), entered June 18, 1996, as, after a hearing, increased his monthly child support obligation to $1,523.00.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

When one parent seeks to increase the support obligations of the other parent based upon increased needs, it is not necessary to show an unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances, because the increase is predicated on the children’s right to receive adequate support *(see, Matter of Michaels v Michaels,*56 NY2d 924, 926; *Matter of Brescia v Fitts,*56 NY2d 132; *Haimowitz v Gerber,*153 AD2d 879). However, the increased support is warranted only where the movant sets *381forth specific increased expenses on behalf of the child as opposed to merely a general claim that the children’s needs have increased as the child matured or as a result of inflation *(see, Matter of Hogan v Eriksen,*228 AD2d 505; *Matter of Halliday v Taddeo,*223 AD2d 542; *Matter of Staffanell v Staffanell,*220 AD2d 751; *Rocchio v Rocchio,*213 AD2d 535; *Matter of Adams-Eppes v Fulton,*195 AD2d 455; *Zucker v Zucker,*187 AD2d 507, 509).

Here, the Family Court properly found that the mother failed to satisfy her burden of proving specific increased needs of the parties’ children which warrant an increase in child support *(see, Matter of Staffanell v Staffanell, supra; Matter of Adams-Eppes v Fulton, supra; Zucker v Zucker, supra).*Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.
## 14

- 09

- 00292

- CR

Christopher Ray Barten

vs.

The State of Texas

ORDER

On this day, the Court on it s own motion, requests that the

mandate be recalled. Mandate was issued by the Clerk of this Court to

Chris Daniel, District Clerk of Harris County, Texas in the above cause

(being trial court number 1111900). This case was appealed from the

232nd District Court, Harris County on April 1, 2009. The same having

been considered, it is ordered that the Clerk of the 14 th Court of

Appeals, at Houston, recal l the above mentioned mandate from the

District Clerk of Harris County, Texas.

Signed : July 27, 2015

CHRISTOPHER PRINE, CLERK
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-195009), and the related Prospectus of Empresa Nacional de
Electricidad S.A. (Endesa-Chile) of our reports dated January 27, 2015, and February 17, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for
the year ended December 31, 2014.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young Audit S.A.S.
|                              
|Ernst & Young Audit S.A.S.    
|                              
|Bogotá, Colombia              
|                              
|April 30, 2015
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7759

DOMINIC EUGENE FOOTE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GEORGE T. SOLOMON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:14-cv-00877-WO-JLW)

Submitted: March 23, 2016 Decided: April 5, 2016

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dominic Eugene Foote, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, 

III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dominic Eugene Foote seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Foote has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2760 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1615 North Wilcox Avenue in Los Angeles, 

California, as the ‘‘Johnny Grant Hollywood Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2760 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. JOHNNY GRANT HOLLYWOOD POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1615 North Wilcox Avenue in 

5 Los Angeles, California, shall be known and designated 

6 as the ‘‘Johnny Grant Hollywood Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Johnny Grant Holly11 wood Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 12.2**
**302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Manuel Irarrázaval A., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F ofEmpresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (“Endesa Chile”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) designed such internal control overfinancial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
(d) disclosed in this report any changein the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annualreport that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
(a) all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: June 6, 2008.
**/**s/ Manuel IrarrázavalA.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual report on Form 10-KSB of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, LP, (the Partnership) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 8, 2007



|                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                              
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)