alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, William T. Atkins, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AmeriVest Properties Inc (the registrant).;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: March 16, 2005                                          |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/WILLIAM T. ATKINSWilliam T. Atkins
Chief Executive Officer |  | 



QuickLinks
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Lyn BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-30346.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 15, 2011.

Paulette Lynn Stewart, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Wendy Holton, Wendy Holton, Attorney at Law, Helena, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Daniel Lyn Bennett appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 200-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Bennett’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. A supplemental brief and answering brief have been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 8, 2011 

0228 

Order 

 

March 8, 2011 

142108 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142108 

 COA: 288667 

Wayne CC: 07-014323-FH 

CHARLENE PEOPLES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                       OF
                        PAINEWEBBER/GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME
                            LIMITED PARTNERSHIP III-B


       The undersigned  General Partner hereby duly executes this Certificate of
Limited  Partnership of  PaineWebber/Geodyne  Energy Income Limited  Partnership
III-B (the  "Partnership"),  which is being filed with the Secretary of State of
Oklahoma in accordance with the Oklahoma  Revised  Uniform  Limited  Partnership
Act.

       1.    The name of the Partnership is PaineWebber/Geodyne  Energy Income
Limited Partnership III-B.

       2. The address of the registered  office of the  Partnership is 320 South
Boston,  The Mezzanine,  Tulsa,  Oklahoma 74103,  and the name of the registered
agent whose business  office  address will be the same as the registered  office
address is Geodyne Production Company.

       3. The address of the principal  office of the  Partnership in the United
States  where its  partnership  records are to be kept or made  available is c/o
Geodyne  Production  Company,  320 South Boston Avenue,  the  Mezzanine,  Tulsa,
Oklahoma 74103-3708.

       4. The name,  the mailing  address and the street address of the business
or residence of each general partner of the Partnership are as follows:

Name                      Mailing Address            Business Address
----                      ---------------            ----------------
Geodyne Production        320 S. Boston Ave.         320 S. Boston Ave.
Company                   The Mezzanine              The Mezzanine
                          Tulsa, OK 74103-3708       Tulsa, 0K 74103-3708

       5.    The latest  date upon which the  Partnership  is to  dissolve  is
January 24, 2010.

       SIGNED on this 24th day of January, 1990.


                                         GENERAL PARTNER:

                                         Geodyne Production Company
                                         a Delaware corporation

                                         By: /s/ Michael E. Luttrell
                                             -----------------------
                                             Michael E. Luttrell
                                             Executive Vice President
Exhibit 10(lx)

NASDAQ LOGO

The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
1735 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006-1500
202 496 2500
Fax 202 496 2699

VIA FACSIMILE & REGULAR MAIL

September 15, 1998

Mr. Kevin Brannon
Chairman and CEO
Frederick Brewing Company
4607 Wedgewood Boulevard
Frederick, MD 21703

Dear Mr. Brannon:

The purpose of my letter is to bring to your attention a concern regarding the
continued listing of Frederick Brewing Company's shares of common stock (BLUE)
on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market. Based upon the staff's review of the price data
covering the last thirty consecutive trade dates, your Company's shares of
common stock have failed to maintain a closing bid price greater than or equal
to $1.00. To be eligible for continued listing, all securities, the Company's
shares of common stock, must maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00./1

We recognize this deficiency may be a temporary situation, and no delisting
action with respect to the bid price deficiency will be initiated at this time.
Instead, the Company will be provided ninety (90) calendar days in which to
regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement./2 If at anytime within
the next ninety calendar days from the date of this letter, the shares of common
stock reports a closing bid price of $1.00 or greater for ten consecutive
trading days, it will have complied with the minimum bid price requirement.

However, if the Company is unable to demonstrate compliance with the minimum
$1.00 bid price on or before the end of the ninety day period December 14, 1998,
the Company's securities will be subject to delisting, effective with the close
of business on December 14, 1998. To stay the delisting, the Company may request
a hearing by the

--------------
1/ Marketplace Rule 43 10(c)(04).
2/ The ninety day period relates exclusively to the bid price deficiency. The
Company may be delisted during the ninety day period for failure to maintain
compliance with any other listing requirement for which it is currently on
notice or which occurs during the period.
<PAGE>

close of business on December 14, 1998. For more information on the hearing
process, please contact the Listing Qualifications Hearing Department at (202)
496-2635.

If you have any questions concerning the compliance issues discussed above,
please call me at (202) 496-2669.


Very truly yours,

/s/ Robert J. McCormick
-----------------------------
Robert J. McCormick
Analyst
Nasdaq Listing Qualifications

cc:     Cam Funkhouser
        Market Surveillance
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Main Place Funding, LLC                                                                                           Exhibit 12
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in Thousands)


                                                                  Year                  Year                    Year
                                                                 Ended                  Ended                  Ended
                                                              December 31,          December 31,            December 31,
                                                                  1999                  1998                    1997
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                <C>                    <C>                    <C>
Income before taxes                                                $ 1,257,141            $ 2,341,426            $ 1,294,152

Fixed charges:
     Interest expense                                                  477,810              1,056,419                595,818
     Amortization of debt discount and
       appropriate issuance costs                                        3,306                  3,128                  3,713
                                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------
        Total fixed charges                                            481,116              1,059,547                599,531

Earnings before fixed charges                                      $ 1,738,257            $ 3,400,973            $ 1,893,683
                                                          ====================================================================

Fixed charges                                                        $ 481,116            $ 1,059,547              $ 599,531
                                                          ====================================================================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                        3.61                   3.21                   3.16
                                                          ====================================================================
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2884 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2884

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that electricity 
produced in certain possessions of the United States and other areas is 
eligible for the credit for electricity produced from certain renewable 
                               resources.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2009

  Mr. Faleomavaega (for himself, Ms. Bordallo, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. 
  Pierluisi, and Mr. Sablan) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that electricity 
produced in certain possessions of the United States and other areas is 
eligible for the credit for electricity produced from certain renewable 
                               resources.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELECTRICITY PRODUCED IN CERTAIN POSSESSIONS OF THE UNITED 
              STATES AND OTHER AREAS ELIGIBLE FOR RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY 
              PRODUCTION CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 45(e) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of 
subparagraph (A), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (B) 
and inserting a comma, and by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraphs:
                    ``(C) Guam, American Samoa, Commonwealth of the 
                Northern Marianas Islands, United States Virgin 
                Islands, or Puerto Rico, including all territorial 
                waters, seabed and subsoil of submarine areas thereof,
                    ``(D) Republic of the Marshall Islands, Federated 
                States of Micronesia, or Republic of Palau, including 
                all territorial waters, seabed and subsoil of submarine 
                areas thereof, or
                    ``(E) any United States Government installation 
                worldwide, including military bases, embassies and 
                other facilities, whether owned or leased by the United 
                States Government, including all areas set forth in 
                section 638 (all territorial waters, seabed and subsoil 
                of submarine areas adjacent to such installations).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 4.1

 

Share Certificate

 

	
Certificate No:
    	
Number   of shares: [  ]
    


 

Hanson Building Products Limited

 

(the Company)

 

Incorporated in Jersey under the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991

 

Registered Number 116431

 

This is to certify that                                                    of                                                    is the registered holder of [   ] fully paid ordinary share[s] of USD              in the Company, subject to the Company’s memorandum and articles of association.

 

Given for and on behalf of the Company on

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Director
    	
 
    	
Director/Secretary
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**786**

**KA 13**

**- 00073** 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KACIE MUNSON, DEFENDANT

- APPELLANT.

ROBERT TUCKER, PALMYRA, FOR DEFENDANT

- APPELLANT.

RICHARD M. HEALY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LYONS (BRUCE A. ROSEKRANS OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Wayne County Court (John B. Nesbitt, J.), rendered December 13, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that t he judgment so appealed from is unanimously

affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree (Penal Law ' 120.10 [1]). Defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction and thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that his plea was not knowing and voluntary ( see People v Jones

, 118 AD3d 1354, 1354). Defendant also failed to preserve for ou r review his contention that County Court improperly delegated to the prosecutor the authority to conduct a portion of the plea allocution ( see People

v Swontek [appeal No. 1], 289 AD2d 989, 989). This case does not fall within the narrow exception to the preservation rule ( see People v Lopez

, 71 NY2d 662, 666).

Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: August 8, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, P. Chrisman Iribe, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 of Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P.;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered in this report based on such
evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 29, 2004 /s/ P. CHRISMAN IRIBEP. Chrisman IribePresidentIndiantown Cogeneration, L.P.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2917 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2917

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny any deduction for 
                    advertising prescription drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2009

 Mr. Lipinski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny any deduction for 
                    advertising prescription drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DENIAL OF DEDUCTION FOR ADVERTISING PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

    (a) In General.--Part IX of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items not deductible) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 280I. DENIAL OF DEDUCTION FOR ADVERTISING PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

    ``(a) In General.--No deduction shall be allowed under this chapter 
with respect to--
            ``(1) any advertisement primarily for purposes of promoting 
        the sale or use of any prescribed drug (as defined in section 
        213(d)(3)), and
            ``(2) any of the following incurred or provided primarily 
        for purposes described in paragraph (1):
                    ``(A) Travel expenses (including meals and 
                lodging).
                    ``(B) Goods or services of a type generally 
                considered to constitute entertainment, amusement, or 
                recreation or the use of a facility in connection with 
                providing such goods and services.
                    ``(C) Gifts.
                    ``(D) Other promotion expenses.
    ``(b) Regulations.--The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations 
as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such part IX is 
amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``Sec. 280I. Denial of deduction for advertising prescription drugs.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid or incurred after the date of the enactment of 
this Act in taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000927388
<NAME> BGLS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          19,590
<SECURITIES>                                    64,429
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     45,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               187,985
<PP&E>                                         197,357
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (43,111)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 502,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          224,353
<BONDS>                                        148,349
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (132,456)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   502,521
<SALES>                                        567,045
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               567,045
<CGS>                                          189,865
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  302,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               296,620
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (57,910)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                312,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                    82,458
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            235,933
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,249
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,660)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   235,522
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>