alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Allied Security Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”) for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Daniel Sobolewski, Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|By: | /s/ Daniel Sobolewski                                 | 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Daniel Sobolewski                                     | 
|    | Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | (Principal Executive Officer)                         | 
|    | January 10, 2019                                      | 





A signed original of this certification
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guohua Sun, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









|/s/ Guohua Sun                     
|-----------------------------------
|Guohua Sun, Chief Executive Officer
|November 15, 2016
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

 

**LQ CORPORATION, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LQ Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Melvyn Brunt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and 

 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: May 14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000927362
<NAME> PRI AUTOMATION, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          51,865
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,646
<INVENTORY>                                     28,351
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,063
<PP&E>                                          43,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,797
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           223
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,552
<SALES>                                        100,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,296
<CGS>                                           63,850
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                90,897<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (523)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,020)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,065
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (36,085)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,085)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.67)
<FN>
<F1> Includes $6,375 of merger costs and special charges
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 4, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael M. Searles, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                              /s/ MICHAEL M. SEARLES   **Michael M. Searles,**   **Chief Executive Officer**   September 13, 2007
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00670

- CR

WILLIE MICHAEL MWACHANDE

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 372nd District Court of Tarrant County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 1262338D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
January 30, 2014
# Secretary’sCertificate

 

 

April 3, 2001

 

I, William E. Murray, hereby certify:

 

1.             Thatas of April 3, 2001, I am the duly elected Secretary of Vysis, Inc., a DelawareCorporation (the “Company”), and that I have held that position since March1994.

 

2.             That on April 3, 2001, theCompany’s Board of Directors duly adopted by Consent Resolution the following:

 

                “FURTHER RESOLVED, that Article III, Section 2 ofthe Company’s Bylaws is amended to state that the number of directors “shallnot be less than three nor more than eleven”, with no other changes made to theBylaws;”

 

 

 
| /s/ William E. Murray                |
|--------------------------------------|
| William E. Murray                    |
| Secretary                            |
| Vysis, Inc. (a Delaware Corporation) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 2 AND 3
OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,774)
<INVENTORY>                                     26,394
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,375
<PP&E>                                          79,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,240)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,112
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,955
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   304,548
<SALES>                                        107,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,367
<CGS>                                           91,453
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,111
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,907
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,363
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,544
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,544
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2900 

To repeal the wage rate requirements commonly known as the Davis-Bacon 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2009 

Mr. KING of Iowa (for himself and Mr. MACK) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To repeal the wage rate requirements commonly known as 

the Davis-Bacon Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Davis-Bacon Repeal 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DAVIS-BACON WAGE REQUIREMENTS. 

7 Subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United 

8 States Code, is repealed. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2900 IH

1 SEC. 3. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS REPEAL. 

2 Section 276c of title 40, United States Code, is re3 pealed. 

4 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE AND LIMITATION. 

5 The amendments made by sections 2 and 3 shall take 

6 effect 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act 

7 but shall not affect any contract in existence on such date 

8 of enactment or made pursuant to invitation for bids out9 standing on such date of enactment. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Altair  Nanotechnologies  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Edward Dickinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Edward Dickinson
---------------------------
    Edward Dickinson
    Chief Financial Officer
    November 12, 2002
Exhibit
32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Skuli Thorvaldsson,
certify that:

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Digital Creative Development Corporation for the quarter ending March
31, 2014 (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with
                                                                the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
                                                                of 1934; as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in
                                                                the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                                                                condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
May 15, 2014



/s/ Skuli Thorvaldsson

Skuli Thorvaldsson

Chief Financial Officer
----

Exhibit 15.1

[LETTERHEAD OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP]

Report of Independent Auditors 

We hereby consent to (i) the inclusion inMetallica Resources Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year endedDecember 31, 2007; and (ii) the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (No. 333-36154 (as amended by Post-Effective AmendmentNo. 1 thereto) and No. 333-148255), of our audit report dated March 20, 2008,relating to the consolidated financial statements for each of the years in thethree year period ended December 31, 2007 and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Metallica Resources Inc. as at December 31,2007. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**Chartered Accountants**Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaMarch 28, 2008

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2197

JOSEPH GLOVER, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES;

FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-107-3-P)

Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 19, 1997

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Glover, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Sullivan,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Glover, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.

§§ 2671-2680 (1994), as barred under the statute of limitations. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Glover v. HHS, No. CA-97-107-3-P (W.D.N.C. Aug. 7,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
Exhibit 3.1.1

                                                                           FILED
                                         In the office of the Secretary of State
                                                      of the State of California
                                                                     APR 15 1998
                                                                         1611505

                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                                     VOXEL



                                       I

      The name of this corporation is Voxel.

                                       II

      The purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity
for which a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation Law of
California other than the banking business, the trust company business or the
practice of a profession permitted to be incorporated by the California
Corporations Code.

                                      III

      The name and address in the State of California of this corporation's
initial agent for service of process is: Francis S. Currie, Two Palo Alto
Square, Suite 900, Palo Alto, CA 94306.

                                       IV

      This corporation is authorized to issue only one class of shares of stock,
designated "Common Stock." and the total number of shares which this corporation
is authorized to issue is 1,000,000.

                                       V

      This corporation is authorized to provide for, through bylaw provisions or
through agreements with the agents, or both, the indemnification of agents (as
defined in Section 317 of the California General Corporation Law) of the
corporation in excess of that expressly permitted by said Section 317 for said
agents to the

<PAGE>

fullest extent permissible under California law, subject to the limitations set
forth in Section 204 of the California General Corporation Law in actions
brought by or on behalf of the corporation for breach of duty to this
corporation or its shareholders.

     DATED: April 13, 1998


                                        /s/ John V. Roos
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John V. Roos, Incorporator

      I hereby declare that I am the person who executed the foregoing Articles
of Incorporation, which execution is my act and deed.

                                        /s/ John V. Roos
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John V. Roos
#### Adin Falkoff, Appellant, v W. Denis Donovan, Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 516]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Roberto, J.), dated January 27, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and denied his cross motion for summary judgment in his favor.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Judges and those who perform similar functions, such as Hearing Examiners, “ ‘ “are not liable to civil actions for their judicial acts, even when such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, and are alleged to have been done maliciously and corruptly”” *(Colin v County of Suffolk,*181 AD2d 653, 654, quoting *Stump v Sparkman,*435 US 349, 356). However, although a Judge will not be deprived of immunity because the action he or she took was in excess of authority, he or she will be subject to liability when action was taken in the “clear absence of all jurisdiction” *(Stump v Sparkman, supra,*at 357). In the present case, the plaintiff has failed to proffer evidence demonstrating that the defendant performed any acts in the clear absence of all jurisdiction. Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman, Krausman and Lerner, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2853 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2853

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To require the purchase of domestically made flags of the United States 
             of America for use by the Federal Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``All-American Flag Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR PURCHASE OF DOMESTICALLY MADE UNITED STATES 
              FLAGS FOR USE BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

    Only such flags of the United States of America, regardless of 
size, that are 100 percent manufactured in the United States, from 
articles, materials, or supplies 100 percent of which are grown, 
produced, or manufactured in the United States, may be acquired for use 
by the Federal Government.

SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT TO USE WORKERS AUTHORIZED TO WORK IN THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    In carrying out section 2, the Federal Government may purchase 
flags only from a manufacturer that certifies that--
            (1) the manufacturer does not employ aliens who are not 
        authorized to be employed in the United States; and
            (2) the manufacturer participates in the E-Verify Program 
        under section 401 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and 
        Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1324a note).

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 2 shall apply to purchases of flags made on or after 180 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30 
      (legislative day September 29), 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2853

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To require the purchase of domestically made flags of the United States 
             of America for use by the Federal Government.
```