alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.4








HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL  
April 30, 2018
Michelle Dipp, M.D.
c/o OvaScience, Inc.
9 Fourth Avenue
Waltham, Massachusetts 02451


RE:    Termination of Advisory Agreement
Dear Michelle:
You and OvaScience, Inc. (the “Company”) are parties to that certain Advisory Agreement governing your advisory services to the Company dated June 21, 2017 (as amended August 3, 2017) (the “Advisory Agreement”).  We have agreed to terminate the Advisory Agreement in accordance with the terms set forth herein.
As further described herein, we agree to the following terms, which have been approved by our Board of Directors:
		
	1.  
	Termination of the Advisory Agreement and Waiver of Retainer.


The Advisory Agreement and your advisory services to the Company will be terminated as of the date hereof.  You acknowledge you have been fully paid for your services through December 31, 2017 in accordance with Section 1(c)(i) of the Advisory Agreement and that you agree to forego the $250,000 retainer due to you for the period beginning January 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018 under Section 1(c)(ii) of the Advisory Agreement.
		
	2.  
	Waiver of Bonus Payment Under the Advisory Agreement.


You agree to waive the discretionary cash bonus for Fiscal 2017 based on your 2017 performance in the amount of up to $300,000 that you were entitled to under your employment agreement with the Company dated January 5, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”) and that you continued to be eligible to receive under Section 1(c)(iv) of the Advisory Agreement.
		
	3.  
	Option Vesting and Exercisability. 


Notwithstanding anything set forth in the Advisory Agreement, all outstanding options granted to you prior to the date hereof set forth on Exhibit A hereto (the “Outstanding Options”), shall become 100% fully vested and shall remain exercisable until each Outstanding Option’s Expiration Date set forth on Exhibit A, and otherwise in accordance with their terms.


If this letter correctly sets forth your understanding regarding the termination of your Advisory Agreement with the Company, please sign the enclosed duplicate of this letter in the space provided below and return it to me.


Sincerely,
/s/ Chris Kroeger    
Name: Chris Kroeger
Title: CEO






The foregoing correctly sets forth the terms regarding the termination of my Advisory Agreement with OvaScience, Inc.  I am not relying on any representation other than those set forth above.
/s/ Michelle Dipp        April 30, 2018    
Michelle Dipp, M.D.    Date







Exhibit A
Outstanding Options


	
				
	Grant Date
	Number of Shares
	Exercise Price
	Expiration Date

	December 5, 2012
	339,313
	$7.80
	December 4, 2022

	June 13, 2014
	23,724
	$8.43
	June 12, 2024

	June 13, 2014
	476,276
	$8.43
	June 12, 2024

	December 9, 2014
	200,000
	$32.36
	December 8, 2024

	March 2, 2017
	150,000
	$1.49
	March 2, 2027

	June 21, 2017
	133,505
	$1.46
	June 21, 2027

	June 21, 2017
	41,495
	$1.46
	June 21, 2027
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2706 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for the reissuance 

of Social Security account numbers to young children in cases in which 

the confidentiality of the number has been compromised by reason of 

theft. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2009 

Mr. MARCHANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide 

for the reissuance of Social Security account numbers 

to young children in cases in which the confidentiality 

of the number has been compromised by reason of theft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Young Children Social 

5 Security Number Protection Act of 2009’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2706 IH

1 SEC. 2. REISSUANCE OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUM2 BERS TO YOUNG CHILDREN IN CASES WHERE 

3 CONFIDENTIALITY HAS BEEN COMPROMISED 

4 BY REASON OF THEFT. 

5 Section 205(c)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(B)) is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv); 

8 and 

9 (2) by inserting after clause (ii) the following 

10 new clause: 

11 ‘‘(iii) In any case in which a Social Security account 

12 number has been issued to a child pursuant to subclause 

13 (IV) or (V) of clause (i) and it is demonstrated to the 

14 Commissioner of Social Security by a parent or guardian 

15 of the child that, in the course of transmission of docu16 mentation of such number to the child, the confidentiality 

17 of such number has been compromised by reason of theft 

18 of such documentation, the Commissioner shall issue a 

19 new Social Security account number to such child and 

20 make note in the records maintained with respect to such 

21 child of the pertinent information received by the Commis22 sioner regarding the theft of the documentation of the 

23 original number.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

R. DAVID AND SHERRI P. MITCHELL

v.

MEGILL HOMES, INC., MEGILL HOMES, 

LLC.,MISTY MEADOWS HOMES, INC., 

WAYNE C. MEGILL, SCOTT M. MEGILL, 

AND BARBARA A. MEGILL

PETITION OF: MISTY MEADOWS 

HOMES, INC., AND MEGILL HOMES, INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 534 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of LCC International, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) |  | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2003, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.                                                                                                                          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to LCC International, Inc. and will be retained by LCC
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.



| | /s/ Graham B. Perkins
Graham B. Perkins
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
May 14, 2003
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

24
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Terry M. Copeland, President and CEO of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)              The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)              The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/  Terry
      M. CopelandTerry
      M. Copeland, President and CEO
              August 7,
2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15298 and #15299; Puerto Rico Disaster Number PR-00029]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 3.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico  (FEMA-4336-DR), dated 09/10/2017.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Irma.                    

*Incident Period:*                         09/05/2017 through 09/07/2017.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 09/26/2017.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/09/2017.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/11/2018.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, dated 09/10/2017, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Municipalities (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Catano, Dorado, Fajardo, Luquillo, Toa Baja, Vega Baja                

*Contiguous Municipalities (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Puerto Rico: Bayamon, Ceiba, Guaynabo, Manati, Morovis, San Juan, Toa Alta, Vega Alta

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2017-21449 Filed 10-4-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Jose Alfredo RODRIGUEZ-PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-71071.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 16, 2011.

Keli M. Reynolds, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Cindy S. Ferrier, Senior Litigation Counsel, OIL, Michelle Gorden Latour, Esquire, Assistant Director, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of The District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Alfredo Rodriguez-Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Rodriguez-Perez’s motion to reopen as untimely because it was filed over 90 days after the BIA’s final order, *see 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and because Rodriguez-Perez failed to establish the due diligence required for equitable tolling, *see Iturribarria,*321 F.3d at 897.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
exh_1033.htm


EXHIBIT 10.33(a)


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AND SEVERANCE AGREEMENT







This Amendment to Employment and Severance Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made this December 3, 2014 between Steiner Leisure Limited, a Bahamas international business company (the “Company”) and Stephen Lazarus (“Employee”), to be effective as indicated herein.







WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into an Employment and Severance Agreement dated February 3, 2011 (the “Agreement”) and the Company and Employee wish to amend the terms of the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:







1. Amendment to Section 1 of the Agreement.  The first sentence of Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirely and replaced with the following:







Effective on the Effective Date (as defined in Section 2, below), the Company hereby employs Employee as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and Employee hereby accepts such employment.







2. Effective Date.  The effective date of this Amendment shall be January 1, 2015.







3. Defined Terms.  Capitalized terms used in this Amendment but not defined shall have the same meaning as in the Agreement.







4. No Other Amendment.  Except as set forth in this Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed these presents as of the day and year first above written.


 




	 	STEINER LEISURE LIMITED
	 	
 


 


	 	 	By: 	 
	Stephen Lazarus 	Name:	 
Leonard Fluxman


	 	Title: 	 
President and CEO
32.1              Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                  Financial Officer of VOXEL pursuant to Section 906 of
                  the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of VOXEL (the "Company") for
the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael Anthony,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of VOXEL, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 17, 2008

                                      /s/Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Financial Officer
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1439

___________ Daniel C. Buller, Private Citizen; * Marie R. Buller, Private Citizen, * * Appellants, * * v. * * Kathleen A. Jaudzemis, Magistrate * Appeal from the United States Judge; Eileen L. McBride, Attorney; * District Court for the Terrance L. Michael, Attorney; Lyle * District of Nebraska. E. Strom, Judge; Thomas J. * Monaghan, Attorney; Thomas M. * [UNPUBLISHED] Shanahan, Judge; Neal E. Galloway; * Rose M. Haga; Wille Greason, Jr., U.S. * Marshall; David L. Piester, Magistrate * Judge; Roy Smith; William G. * Cambridge, Judge; Pamela K. * Bennett; Laurie M. Barrett, Attorney; * Sally R. Johnson, Attorney; Mark * Hoesing; James L. Engle; Thomas D. * Thalken, Judge, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 5, 1998 Filed: June 24, 1998

___________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________TheHonorable William G. Cambridge, Chief Judge, United States Distric t 1 Court for the District of Nebraska. -2- PER CURIAM. Daniel and Marie Buller appeal the district cour t & s judgment assessing a $2,000 1 sanction against

them pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. After a review of the record an d the parties & submissions on appeal, we believe that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sanctioning the Bullers. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
This matter arises out of a

previous district court case ( see Buller v. Jaudzemis , No. 8: CV-96-0047 (D. Neb. Mar. 4, 1997)), filed by the Bullers. Although Chie f Judge Cambridge is listed as a p arty in this action, it is not alleged that he participated in any way in the previous litigation. W hen Chief Judge Cambridge assigned this case to hims elf noting that he had "had absolutely nothing to do with the subject matte r therein," no party raised the issue of his recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 455 or otherwise. The issue is also not raised on appeal. See United States v. Bauer , 19 F.3d 409, 414 (8th Cir. 1994) (not

ing that this court has held that claims under section 455 "'will not be considered u nless timely made'") (quoted case omitted). If it had been, any failure to recuse was "har

mless error" under the circumstances. See Parker v. Connors Steel Co. , 855 F.2d 1510, 1527 (11th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruben ALVAREZ-CERVANTES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10155.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 15, 2011.

Kristen Brook Kelly, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Adam N. Bleier, Law Offices of Adam N. Bleier, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ruben Alvarez-Cervantes appeals from the revocation of his supervised release and the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Alvarez-Cervantes’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                          Subsidiaries of the Company


Subsidiary Name                                      State of Incorporation
---------------                                      ----------------------

Spanish Broadcasting System of Greater Miami, Inc.    Delaware
Spanish Broadcasting System of Illinois, Inc.         Delaware
Spanish Broadcasting System Inc.                      New Jersey
Spanish Broadcasting System of San Antonio, Inc.      Delaware
JuJu Media, Inc.                                      New York
Alarcon Holdings, Inc.                                New York
Spanish Broadcasting System of California, Inc.       California
Spanish Broadcasting System of Puerto Rico, Inc.      Delaware
Spanish Broadcasting System of Florida, Inc.          Florida
SBS of Greater New York, Inc.                         New York
SBS Funding, Inc.                                     Delaware
Spanish Broadcasting System of Puerto Rico, Inc.      Puerto Rico
Spanish Broadcasting System Network, Inc.             New York
Spanish Broadcasting System Finance Corporation       Delaware
Spanish Broadcasting System Holding Company, Inc.     Puerto Rico
SBS Promotions, Inc.                                  New York
KTCY Licensing, Inc.                                  Delaware
KSAH Licensing, Inc.                                  Delaware
KXJO Licensing, Inc.                                  Delaware
KFSG Licensing, Inc. (f/k/a KMJR Licensing, Inc.)     Delaware
KFSB Licensing, Inc. (f/k/a KNJR Licensing, Inc.)     Delaware
WRMA Licensing, Inc.                                  Delaware
WXDJ Licensing, Inc.                                  Delaware
WLEY Licensing, Inc.                                  Delaware
WSKQ Licensing, Inc.                                  Delaware
KLEY Licensing, Inc.                                  Delaware
WCMQ Licensing, Inc.                                  Delaware
KLAX Licensing, Inc.                                  Delaware
WPAT Licensing, Inc.                                  Delaware
WCMA Licensing, Inc.                                  Delaware
WSMA Licensing, Inc. (f/k/a WEGM Licensing, Inc.)     Delaware
WMEG Licensing, Inc.                                  Delaware
WLDI, Inc.                                            Puerto Rico
WZNT, Inc.                                            Puerto Rico
WRPC, Inc.                                            Puerto Rico
WIO, Inc.                                             Puerto Rico
WOYE, Inc.                                            Puerto Rico
WOQI, Inc.                                            Puerto Rico
Cadena Estereotempo, Inc.                             Puerto Rico
Portorican American Broadcasting, Inc.                Puerto Rico
Spanish Broadcasting System Group of
  Puerto Rico, Inc.                                   Puerto Rico
Spanish Broadcasting System SouthWest, Inc.           Delaware
Spanish Broadcasting System-San Francisco, Inc.       Delaware
Exhibit 32.1.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Robert B. Barnhill, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated, (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




1.The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended March 27, 2011, (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and




2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: May 24, 2011
By:
/s/ Robert B. Barnhill, Jr.Robert B. Barnhill, Jr.




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.