alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.3


                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, David A. Simon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of National Property Analysts
Master Limited Partnership ("NPAMLP");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. [Intentionally omitted];

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: July 22, 2005
      -------------

By:   EBL&S Property Management Inc., Agent for NPAMLP
      ------------------------------------------------

By:   /s/ David A. Simon
      ------------------
      Name:  David A. Simon
      Title  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7142

DANIEL W. COLLINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DONALD AMES, Superintendent,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at 

Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:22-cv-00082)

Submitted: December 20, 2022 Decided: December 27, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel W. Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Sara See, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7142 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel W. Collins seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Collins’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition

without prejudice. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 

759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Collins has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7142 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000927478
<NAME> COMMUNITY BANKSHARES,INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          31,834
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             161
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,940
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     49,143
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          31,939
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            31,349
<LOANS>                                        376,868
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 516,150
<DEPOSITS>                                     444,056
<SHORT-TERM>                                    16,054
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             11,237
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           13,982
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,179
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 516,150
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 35,041
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,373
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   876
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                40,290
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              17,168
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,697
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,593
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,637
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 23,831
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,635
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,635
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,076
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.90
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,743
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,572
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   842
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,863
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,078
<RECOVERIES>                                       261
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,683
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,683



</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We have issued our report dated August 13, 2004, accompanying the consolidated financial statements appearing in the financial report of
Cyberguard Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Cyberguard Corporation and Subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File
No.s 333-87347, 33-88446, 33-88448, 333-50042, 333-58262, 333-73852, 333-56768, and 333-112336).



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Grant Thornton LLP  
|Fort Lauderdale, Florida
|August 13, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andres Castro, Appellant.

[665 NYS2d 881]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nicholas Iacovetta, J., at hearing; Roger Hayes, J., at trial and sentence), rendered on or about March 20, 1996, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.
#### Olga Marina PAZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70320.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 10, 2011.

*706Mario Acosta, Jr., Esquire, Martinez Goldsby & Associates, Elsa Ines Martinez, Esquire, Law Offices of Elsa Martinez, PLC, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Oil, John D. Williams, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *706*See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Olga Marina Paz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo claims of due process violations. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Paz’s motion to reopen on the ground that she failed to show that personal service of an Order to Show Cause was insufficient to provide her with notice of her hearing. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(iii)(A)(2). Oral notice was not required by the statute, *see*8 U.S.C. § 1252b(a) (1994), and Paz’s contention that she was prejudiced by the lack of oral notice under former 8 C.F.R. § 242.1(c) is unpersuasive, *see Matter of Hernandez,*21 I. & N. Dec. 224, 226-27 (BIA 1996).

It follows that Paz has not established a due process violation. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (petitioner must show prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 99.2**
Chief Financial Officer’s Sec. 302 Certification
     I, Alejandro González Dale, certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 20-F/A of Endesa-Chile;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;and
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Endesa-Chileas of, and for, the periods presented in this report.             By: /s/ Alejandro González Dale        Name: Alejandro González Dale        Title: Chief Financial Officer    
Date: February 25, 2004
**Exhibit 12.1**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I,Joaquín Galindo V., certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of EmpresaNacional de Electricidad S.A. (“Endesa Chile”); 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.    The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis deport is being prepared; 

(b)      Designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c)      Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

(d)      Disclosed in this report any change in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.    The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 1, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SCANTEK
MEDICAL INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          55,929
<SECURITIES>                                 3,196,773
<RECEIVABLES>                                  801,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,101,599
<PP&E>                                         855,579
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,208,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,758,736
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,220
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,544,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,208,437
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,238,493
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,583,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             183,889
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                654,801
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            654,801
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   654,801
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        


</TABLE>
#### Marie POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Bruce M. Koeppen, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-9385.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 7, 2003.

Decided April 7, 2004.

Errata Filed Sept. 16, 2004.

Aaron David Frishberg, Esq., Law Office of Aaron D. Frishberg, Esq., New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Sarah Moore Fass, Esq., Day, Berry & Howard, Stamford, CT, Albert Zakarian, Esq., Day, Berry & Howard Cityplaee I, *239Hartford, CT, Jane D. Comerford, Esq., University of Conn. Health Center, Assistant Attorney General, Farmington, CT, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before WALKER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, and CARDAMONE, Circuit Judges.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court issued on April 7, 2004, cited at 364 F.3d 79 is corrected as follows:

> At Slip Op. 2672 [364 F.3d at 85] delete last sentence on the page:

> “Because both UConn and the National Board receive federal funding, they are subject to the provisions of the Rehabilitation Act.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS OF
INDUSTRI-MATEMATIK INTERNATIONAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES ANNEXED HERETO AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001016243
<NAME> INDUSTRI-MATEMATIK INTERNATIONAL CORP.

<S>                             <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               APR-30-2000      APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  AUG-01-1999      MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    OCT-31-1999      OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                           13,851,000       13,851,000
<SECURITIES>                     27,742,000       27,742,000
<RECEIVABLES>                    19,511,000       19,511,000
<ALLOWANCES>                      3,283,000        3,283,000
<INVENTORY>                               0                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 63,337,000       63,337,000
<PP&E>                           16,468,000       16,468,000
<DEPRECIATION>                   10,102,000       10,102,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   96,840,000       96,840,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            22,720,000       22,720,000
<BONDS>                                   0                0
<COMMON>                            316,000          316,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0                0
<PREFERRED>                               0                0
<OTHER-SE>                       70,140,000       70,140,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     96,840,000       96,840,000
<SALES>                          18,288,000       34,964,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 18,288,000       34,964,000
<CGS>                            13,007,000       25,565,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    13,007,000       25,565,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 12,620,000       24,656,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   13,000           41,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (6,850,000)     (14,197,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (6,850,000)     (14,197,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                0
<CHANGES>                                 0                0
<NET-INCOME>                     (6,850,000)     (14,197,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (0.22)           (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.22)           (0.45)





</TABLE>