alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                              L Q CORPORATION, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of L Q Corporation, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Melvyn Brunt,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated: May 19, 2006


                                                     /s/ Melvyn Brunt
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Melvyn Brunt
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

OF MARYLAND Petitioner V. JOHN FRANKLIN BLEVINS Respondent IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

Misc. Docket AG No. 78 September Term, 2018

ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, John Franklin Blevins, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, in which the Respondent admits that he violated Rules 5.3, 5.4, 5.7, and 8.4 (c) and (d) of the Maryland Attorneys' Rules of Professional Conduct. The Court, having considered the Petition. it is this 18th day of April, 2019 ORDERED, that Respondent, John Franklin Blevins, be, and he hereby is, indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland with the right to petition for reinstatement in 90 days, effective immediately; and it is further ORDERED, that, the Clerk of the Court shall remove the name John Franklin Blevins from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-736(d). /s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                      US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                             4085622
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   4188817
<PP&E>                                              797372
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (217471)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     9863803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               166832
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          18212463
<OTHER-SE>                                        (8515492)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       9863803
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    470311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (438069)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (438069)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (438069)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 <F1>
        

<FN>
<F1>
Fully diluted EPS not computed on loss.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RAYMONT WALKER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 9 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7420
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EDWARD DANE JEFFUS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-184, CA-95-227-6) Submitted: January 20, 1998 Decided: February 18, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Dane Jeffus, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)) and denying his various post-decision motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jeffus , Nos. CR92-184; CA-95-227-6 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 11, Mar. 17, & July 18, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). Appellant's motions to supplement the record;"for procedural relief with regard to issue preclusion"; for sanctions; to file a formal brief; "for court to take judicial notice of adjudicative facts"; and for summary reversal are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                                 GARGOYLES, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                  Nine Months Ended
                                                         Quarter Ended September 30,                September 30,        
                                                            1996              1995              1996              1995
                                                        -----------        ----------       -----------        ----------
<S>                                                     <C>                <C>              <C>                <C>       
Weighted average number of common
     stock outstanding ..........................         5,464,543         5,450,003         5,462,182         5,450,003


Common stock and common stock equivalents
     issued during the twelve-month period prior
     to the public offering, using the treasury
     stock method and the initial public offering
     price of $16.00 ............................           249,892           257,075           249,892           257,075
                                                        -----------        ----------       -----------        ----------

                                                          5,714,435         5,707,078         5,712,074         5,707,078
                                                        ===========        ==========       ===========        ==========


Net income (loss) ...............................       $   (15,429)       $  196,510       $(2,636,364)       $  279,168
                                                        ===========        ==========       ===========        ==========

Net income (loss) per share .....................       $     (0.00)       $     0.03       $     (0.46)       $     0.05
                                                        ===========        ==========       ===========        ==========
</TABLE>




The fully diluted computation is not presented as the Company does not have
dilutive securities that are not common stock equivalents.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rashid Bilal, Appellant.

[987 NYS2d 364]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J.), rendered December 15, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed. Order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 9, 2013, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion to vacate the judgment, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was not deprived of effective assistance of counsel. Although counsel’s failure to move to suppress the weapon had no strategic justification but was based on a misunderstanding of the law, that error did not cause defendant any prejudice under the state or federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]).

The CPL 440.10 motion court *(People v Bilal,*41 Misc 3d 1203[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 51568[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2013]) *449correctly determined, based on undisputed material facts, that defendant would not have prevailed on a suppression motion. Unlike the situation in *People v Clermont*(22 NY3d 931 [2013]), this was not a “close” suppression issue *(id.*at 934) where a properly litigated motion might have been successful, or where a suppression hearing is now warranted in the interest of fairness. Instead, the undisputed facts establish that, when added to the information already known to the police, defendant’s flight created reasonable suspicion warranting pursuit *(see People v Moore,*6 NY3d 496, 500-501 [2006]; *see also People v Collado,*72 AD3d 614 [1st Dept 2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 850 [2010]), and that the seizure was lawful, in any event, under the doctrine of abandonment *(see People v Boodle,*47 NY2d 398, 402 [1979], *cert denied*444 US 969 [1979]).

Turning to defendant’s direct appeal, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.
EXHIBIT NO. 21

Subsidiaries of Registrant



|                            |  |                  |  |                                       
|--------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Subsidiaries                |  | Percentage Owned |  | Jurisdiction or State of Incorporation
|Provident Community Bank    |  | 100%             |  | United States                         
|                            |  |                 
|Provident Community         |  |                  |  |                                       
|Bancshares Capital Trust I  |  | 100%             |  | Delaware                              
|                            |  |                 
|Provident Community         |  |                  |  |                                       
|Bancshares Capital Trust II |  | 100%             |  | Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the audited
consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations as of and for the
thirty-nine week period ended September 29, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1999
<CASH>                                          13,151
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  233,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    271,135
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               533,607
<PP&E>                                       6,852,819
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,367,113)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,962,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,147,051
<BONDS>                                         43,552
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,675
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,177,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,962,013
<SALES>                                     10,705,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,729,675
<CGS>                                        3,682,118
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,139,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (541,356)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (541,356)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (541,356)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-04969) pertaining to the 1996 Key Employee
Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-66338) pertaining to the 2001 Polymer Group Stock Option Plan of our report dated March 21, 2003 (except
for Note 30 as to which the date is April 10, 2003), with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Polymer Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 28, 2002.



Greenville,
South Carolina
April 14, 2003

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,466,580
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,515,501
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                50,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,181,992
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,208,680
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         6,909,881
<LOANS>                                     92,533,354
<ALLOWANCE>                                    434,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             114,923,855
<DEPOSITS>                                 101,217,544
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,499,851
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,158
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,700,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             114,923,855
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,715,635
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              532,116
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               423,788
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,671,539
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,828,321
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,994,493
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,677,046
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  125,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,871,007
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,145,076
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     670,238
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   670,238
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.66
<LOANS-NON>                                    954,396
<LOANS-PAST>                                   330,964
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               402,309
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  106,749
<RECOVERIES>                                    13,955
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              434,515
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           434,515
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
y



### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 1 3

- 0 0 863

- CV

DOV K. AVNI A/K/A DO V AVNI KAMINETZKY , Appellant

V.

DAVID A. NEWMAN , Appellee

Appeal from the 333rd District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 20 10

- 22875 ).

TO THE 333RD DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court , on the 6 th day of March

, 201 4 , the cause upon appeal to revise or

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This is an appeal from the order signed by the court

below on July 10, 2013

. Appellant

, Dov K. Avni a/k/a Dov Avni Kaminetzky

, did not timely file a brief. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. It is therefore CONSIDERED

, ADJUDGED , and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution

. It is further ORDERED that appellant pay all costs incurred by reason of this appeal

. It is further ORDERED that this decision be certified

below for observance

.

Judgment rendered March 6 , 201 4

.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of JusticesJennings , Higley, and Sharp

.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeye d, and executed.

May 22, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Majestic Star Casino,
LLC and The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp. (collectively, the "Registrant")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Member, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and
the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of The Majestic Star Casino, LLC
and The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant.

Dated: November 19, 2003

/s/ Don H. Barden
----------------------------------------------------
Don H. Barden
Member, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
The Majestic Star Casino, LLC and
The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.

/s/ Jon S. Bennett
----------------------------------------------------
Jon S. Bennett
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
The Majestic Star Casino, LLC and
The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.
Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Scantek Medical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2002 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Zsigmond L. Sagi, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the
     dates  presented and  consolidated  result of operations of the Company for
     the period presented.


Dated:  October 16, 2002

                                                 /s/ Zsigmond L. Sagi
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Zsigmond L. Sagi,
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and has not been filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3218 

To amend section 1343 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

to ensure the privacy of individually identifiable health information in 

connection with risk adjustment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 14, 2011 

Mr. BUCSHON (for himself and Mr. HUELSKAMP) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend section 1343 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to ensure the privacy of individually identifiable health information in connection with risk adjustment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENSURING THE PRIVACY OF INDIVIDUALLY 

4 IDENTIFIABLE HEALTH INFORMATION IN 

5 CONNECTION WITH RISK ADJUSTMENT. 

6 Section 1343 of the Patient Protection and Afford7 able Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18063) is amended by adding 

8 at the end the following new subsection: 


PWALKER on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3218 IH

1 ‘‘(d) ENSURING PRIVACY OF INDIVIDUALLY IDENTI2 FIABLE HEALTH INFORMATION.—In establishing stand3 ards relating to the collection and sharing of risk-related 

4 data to carry out risk adjustment under this title, the Sec5 retary shall not be provided access to data in individually 

6 identifiable form.’’. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS