alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.1A


                                 AMENDMENT TO
                   SECOND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                                 A.S.V., INC.



     1.    The name of the corporation is A.S.V., Inc., a Minnesota corporation.

     2.    The following amendment to the Second Restated Articles of
Incorporation of A.S.V., Inc. was adopted by the Board of Directors of A.S.V.,
Inc. at a duly called meeting held December 21, 1996, pursuant to Section
302A.402, Subdivision 3 of the Minnesota Business Corporation Act:

     RESOLVED, that Article 3, Section 1 of the Second Restated Articles of
Incorporation is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 
           "1.  Authorized Shares.
                ----------------- 

            The total number of shares of capital stock which the
           corporation is authorized to issue shall be 30,000,000
           shares, consisting of 22,500,000 shares of common stock,
           par value $.01 per share ("Common Stock"), and 7,500,000
           shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share
           ("Preferred Stock")."

     3.    The amendment will not adversely affect the rights or preferences of
the holders of outstanding shares of any class or series and will not result in
the percentage of authorized shares that remain unissued after such amendment
exceeding the percentage of authorized shares that were unissued before such
amendment.
 
     4.    The document attached hereto as Exhibit A sets forth resolutions duly
adopted by the members of the Board of Directors of A.S.V., Inc. at a duly
called meeting held December 21, 1996, which resolutions state the manner in
which the Company's share division will be effected.
<PAGE>
 
     5.    The amendment has been adopted pursuant to Chapter 302A of the
Minnesota Business Corporation Act.

           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, the Secretary of A.S.V., Inc.,
being duly authorized on behalf of A.S.V., Inc., has executed this document on
this 21st day of December, 1996.


                                        /s/ Edgar Hetteen
                                        -------------------------------   
                                        Edgar Hetteen
                                        Secretary
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7420

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDWARD DANE JEFFUS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-92-184, CA-95-227-6)

Submitted: January 20, 1998 Decided: February 18, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Dane Jeffus, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)) and denying his various

post-decision motions. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion accepting the recommendations of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jeffus, Nos. CR92-184; CA-95-227-6 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 11, Mar. 17, & July 18, 1997).

See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23,

1997) (No. 96-6298). Appellant's motions to supplement the record;

"for procedural relief with regard to issue preclusion"; for sanctions; to file a formal brief; "for court to take judicial notice

of adjudicative facts"; and for summary reversal are denied. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2827 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2827

  To amend the Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Act of 
     2005 to provide for a coupon program for television antennas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2009

 Mr. Butterfield introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Act of 
     2005 to provide for a coupon program for television antennas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``DTV Transition Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DIGITAL-TO-ANALOG CONVERTER BOX PROGRAM.

    Section 3005 of the Digital Television Transition and Public Safety 
Act of 2005 is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph 
                (3);
                    (B) by striking ``and'' after the semicolon in 
                paragraph (1); and
                    (C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) implement and administer a program through which 
        households in the United States may obtain coupons that can be 
        applied toward the purchase of a television antenna; and'';
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in the heading for paragraph (1), by striking 
                ``Limitations'' and inserting ``Limitations on 
                converter box coupon program''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Limitations on television antenna coupon program.--
                    ``(A) One-Per-Household maximum.--A household may 
                obtain a coupon by making a request as required by the 
                Assistant Secretary under this section between June 13, 
                2009, and September 15, 2009, inclusive. The Assistant 
                Secretary shall ensure that each requesting household 
                receives, by first class mail via the United States 
                Postal Service, no more than one coupon.
                    ``(B) Duration.--All coupons shall expire on 
                September 30, 2009.
                    ``(C) Funding.--The Assistant Secretary shall 
                expend only funds made available from expired digital-
                to-analog converter box coupons.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE UNAUDITED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 IN THE
REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 OF BRISTOL
RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         467,846
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,622,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                   214,175
<INVENTORY>                                  3,646,748
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,219,638
<PP&E>                                         939,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                 157,801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,159,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,361,073
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,529
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,693,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,159,405
<SALES>                                     14,365,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,365,876
<CGS>                                        9,620,054
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,827,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (124,473)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,376
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,401,703)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,404,203)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DENISE BATTLES, DOC #R62614, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3929 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed July 6, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Chris Helinger, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, CRENSHAW, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1608
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            6213
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      15855
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            7811
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              7927
<LOANS>                                         129957
<ALLOWANCE>                                        928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  171244
<DEPOSITS>                                      117914
<SHORT-TERM>                                     37979
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1824
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         13527
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  171244
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   9747
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1165
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   943
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 11855
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                4666
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6647
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             5208
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      243
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  59
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   3616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2302
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2302
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1444
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.44
<LOANS-NON>                                        778
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1234
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   799
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (165)
<RECOVERIES>                                        51
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  928
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               928
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
 




 
 NUMBER 
Bellicum

PHARMACEUTICALS 
SHARES 
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

CUSIP 079481 10 7 
THIS CERTIFIES THAT SPECIMEN 
IS THE OWNER OF 
FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01, PER
SHARE, OF 
BELLICUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 
transferable on the books of the
Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. 
This certificate is not valid until countersigned and
registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 
Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.

Dated: 
SECRETARY 
BELLICUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 
CORPORATE 
SEAL 
2004

DELAWARE 
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC

(Brooklyn, NY) 
BY: 
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 
AUTHORIZED OFFICER 
© SECURITY-COLUMBIAN UNITED STATES BANKNOTE COMPANY 1960 







 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall
be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

													
	TEN COM	 	 –  as tenants in common
	 	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT–	  	 	                            	 	Custodian	 	                            
	TEN ENT	 	 –  as tenants by the entireties
	 				 	          (Cust)	 		 	        (Minor)
	JT TEN	 	 –  as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common
	 				 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
		 	 				 	Act
                                         
   
		 	 				 	                        (State)

 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto 

 

			
	 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY

OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER
	 	
	 	 	
	 	 	

  
  

 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND
ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 
  
  

 
  

			
	  
	 	shares
	of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


 

			
	  
	 	Attorney
	to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.	 	

  

			
	Dated	 	  


  

					
		 		 	  

		 	NOTICE:	 	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.

  

			
	Signature(s) Guaranteed:	 	
		
	  
	 	
	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO
S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
#### PACIFIC RIVERS COUNCIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; Mark Rey, in his official capacity as Under Secretary of Agriculture; Dale Bosworth, in his capacity as Chief of the United States Forest Service; Jack Blackwell, in his official capacity as Regional Forester, Region 5, United States Forest Service, Defendants-Appellees, and California Forestry Association; American Forest & Paper Association; Quincy Library Group; Plumas County; California Ski Industry Association, Defendant-intervenors-Appellees.

No. 08-17565.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 29, 2013.

Brian Gaffney, Esquire, Lippe Gaffney Wagner, San Francisco, CA, Babak Naficy, Law Offices of Babak Naficy, San Luis Obispo, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Cynthia S. Huber, Esquire, Joan M. Pepin, Jennifer Scheller Neumann, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Barclay T. Samford, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Denver, CO, David Taylor Shelledy, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

J. Michael Klise, Esquire, Thomas Richard Lundquist, Counsel, Crowell *&*Moring LLP, Washington, DC, Steven P. Rice, Esquire, Crowell & Moring LLP, Irvine, CA, Michael B. Jackson, Quincy, CA, for Defendant-intervenors-Appellees.

*1147Before: STEPHEN REINHARDT, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pursuant to the June 17, 2013, order of the Supreme Court, we remand this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California with instructions to dismiss the case as moot in its entirety.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2914 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to terminate 

marketing assistance loans and loan deficiency payments for mohair 

producers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2009 

Mr. CHAFFETZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 

to terminate marketing assistance loans and loan deficiency payments for mohair producers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF AVAILABILITY OF MAR4 KETING ASSISTANCE LOANS AND LOAN DEFI5 CIENCY PAYMENTS FOR MOHAIR PRO6 DUCERS. 

7 (a) REMOVAL OF MOHAIR FROM ELIGIBLE LOAN

8 COMMODITIES.—Section 1001(8) of the Food, ConservaVerDate Nov 24 2008 06:37 Jun 18, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2914.IH H2914

smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2914 IH

1 tion, and Energy Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 8701(8)) is 

2 amended by striking ‘‘mohair,’’. 

3 (b) ELIMINATION OF FUTURE LOAN RATES FOR MO4 HAIR.—Section 1202(c) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 8732(c)) 

5 is amended by striking paragraph (18). 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 29, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00903

- CR

Monisha Monique JOHNSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR11334W

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

A Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal has been filed in this appeal

in which the trial court judge certifies that the underlying criminal case “is a plea

- bargain case,

and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court clerk

file an electronic clerk’s record within ten days from the date of this order containing the

following documents:

1. All pre

- trial orders and the related pre

- trial motions;

2. The Co urt Admonishments, the Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony and

Stipulations, and all other documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain;

3. The judgment;

4. All post

-

judgment motions and orders;

5. The notice of appeal;

6. The Trial C ourt’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and

7. The criminal docket sheet.All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The clerk of this

court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court clerk,

and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of November, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Order filed October 1, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00347

- CV

____________ JOSHUA MAXIMILLIAN MURRAY , Appellant

V. SAVOY MANOR, Appellee

On Appeal from Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1130062



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due September 19, 2019

. No brief or motion for extension of time has been filed. Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or
before October 21, 2019 , the court will dism iss the appeal for want of prosecution.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Christopher, Spain, and Poissant.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Sanders, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 663]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered January 12, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by (1) reversing the defendant’s conviction for assault in the second degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment, and (2) reducing the defendant’s conviction of robbery in the second degree to robbery in the third degree, and vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for resentencing.

*472We agree with the defendant’s contention that the evidence adduced was legally insufficient to establish that one of the complainants suffered physical injury so as to support the conviction of robbery in the second degree and assault in the second degree (see, Penal Law § 160.10 [2]; § 120.05 [2]). The assault victim did not testify at trial, and the only evidence submitted as to the extent of the injury he suffered when the defendant cut the palm of his hand with a razor blade was the testimony of witnesses who saw him bleeding and then cleaning his hand with peroxide. He apparently did not seek medical attention. Viewing this evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), it is legally insufficient to establish that the assault victim suffered an impairment of physical condition or substantial pain *(see,*Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; *People v Cheeks,*161 AD2d 657; *People v Jones,*118 AD2d 658; *cf., People v Guidice,*83 NY2d 630, 636; *People v Camacho,*191 AD2d 451, 452). Thus, the conviction of robbery in the second degree is hereby reduced to one of robbery in the third degree, which does not require proof of physical injury *(see,*Penal Law § 160.10 [2]; § 160.05), and the conviction of assault in the second degree is reversed and that count of the indictment dismissed *(see,*Penal Law § 120.05 [2]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is not preserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.