alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
31.1**
 
 I, J.
Alton Wingate, President and Chief Executive Officer of Community Bankshares
(the “registrant”), certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the registrant;
  2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
  3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;
  4.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:
  a)
    designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;
  b)
    evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  c)
    disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and
  5.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of
      directors:
  a)
    all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information,
and
  b)
    any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
  
 By:/s/
      J. Alton
      Wingate
      J.
      Alton Wingate
      President
      and Chief Executive Officer
      Date:
      March 31, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the OPM Performance Review Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Carmen Garcia, Employee Services—OPM Human Resources, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-1048.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314(c) (1) through (5) of Title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES performance review boards. The board reviews and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor, and considers recommendations to the appointing authority regarding the performance of the senior executive.

Office of Personnel Management.

Kathleen M. McGettigan,

Acting Director.

The following have been designated as members of the Performance Review Board of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management:

Mark Reinhold, Associate Director for Employee Services and Chief Human Capital Officer

Jason Simmons, Chief of Staff

Dennis Coleman, Chief Financial Officer

Charles Phalen, National Background Investigations Bureau Director

Kenneth Zawodny, Associate Director for Retirement Services

Mark Lambert, Associate Director for Merit, Systems, Accountability, and Compliance

Joseph Kennedy, Associate Director for Human Resources Solutions

Andrea Bright, Deputy Chief Human Capital Officer—Executive Secretariat

[FR Doc. 2017-21923 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6325-45-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce Edward CROSS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30127.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2011.*

Filed March 15, 2011.

*721Kimberly R. Sayers-Fay, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Randall S. Cavanaugh, Kalamarides & Lambert, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant Appellant.

Before: FISHER, GOULD and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Bruce Edward Cross appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered during an investigatory stop of his vehicle. We review the denial of the motion to suppress de novo, and affirm. *See United States v. Jennen,*596 F.3d 594, 598 (9th Cir.2010).

“Officers have reasonable suspicion when ‘specific, articulable facts ... together with objective and reasonable inferences, form the basis for suspecting that the particular person detained is engaged in criminal activity.’ ” *United States v. Choudhry,*461 F.3d 1097, 1100 (9th Cir.2006) (quoting *United States v. Lopez-Soto,*205 F.3d 1101, 1105 (9th Cir.2000)). We assess reasonable suspicion in light of the totality of the circumstances. *See United States v. Montero-Camargo,*208 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc). The totality of the circumstances here— including the officer’s training, experience and specific knowledge about the woman’s prior arrest, Cross’ location in a known area of prostitution late at night, and the woman’s appearance and conduct — gave the officer reasonable suspicion to believe the occupants of Cross’ vehicle were engaged in criminal activity involving prostitution, thereby justifying the investigatory stop.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2864 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2864

To amend the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act of 1998 to authorize 
 funds to acquire hydrographic data and provide hydrographic services 
  specific to the Arctic for safe navigation, delineating the United 
 States extended continental shelf, and the monitoring and description 
                          of coastal changes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2009

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act of 1998 to authorize 
 funds to acquire hydrographic data and provide hydrographic services 
  specific to the Arctic for safe navigation, delineating the United 
 States extended continental shelf, and the monitoring and description 
                          of coastal changes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 306 of the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act of 1998 
(33 U.S.C. 892d) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraphs:
            ``(7) To acquire hydrographic data, provide hydrographic 
        services, and conduct coastal change analyses necessary to 
        ensure safe navigation, and to improve the management of 
        coastal change in the Arctic, $10,000,000 for each of fiscal 
        years 2011 and 2012.
            ``(8) To acquire hydrographic data and provide hydrographic 
        services in the Arctic necessary to delineate the United States 
        extended continental shelf, $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
        2011 and 2012.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determine d that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60676

Summary Calendar

ROBERT DAWSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus
DOUG BROGAN, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:94-CV-93LN

January 22, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Robert Dawson, No. 87563, a Mississippi state prisoner,

appeals the jury verdict in favor of Doug Brogan in Dawson’s

federal civil rights action. Because Dawson has failed to identify

and brief any issues for appeal, as required by even p ro s e

litigan ts, he has effectively abandoned any issues he could have

raised on app eal. S ee Price v. Digital Equip. Corp.

, 846 F.2d2

1026, 102 8 (5th Cir. 1988); s ee also Yohey v. Collins

, 985 F.2d

222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

Dawson’s lack of identification and arg ument of any issues

renders his appeal without arguable merit. S ee Howard v. King

, 707

F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). The appeal is DISMISSED as

frivolous. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

We caution Dawson that any additional frivolous appeals filed

by him or on his behalf will invite t he imposition of sanctions.

To avoid sanctions, Daw son is further cautioned to review all

pending appeals to ensure that they raise arguments that are not

frivolous.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
  
 1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 
  
 
 /s/ Dean Cash

Dean L. CashPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)
 
 39
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 21.1

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Active Wholly Owned Subsidiary Corporations of Century Builders Group, Inc.:

US Title & Guaranty Corporation, a Florida Corporation

Century Realty Company, a Florida Corporation

CBG Management Corp., a Florida Corporation

Century Doral Corp., a Florida Corporation

Century Citrus Isles Corp., a Florida Corporation

Century Land Development Corporation, a Florida Corporation

Century Loans Inc., a Florida Corporation

Century Financing Inc., a Florida Corporation

Century Park at Flagler Ltd., a Florida Corporation

Century at Windsor Palms Inc. a Florida Corporation
1 Pardue has moved to supplement the record with an affidavit never presented to the district court. In the affidavit, Pardue asserts that his attorney had a conflict of interest by virtue of her former marriage to a member of the family of the founder of Wal-Mart. She had been divorced for over 10 years before she represented Pardue. Pardue asserts that he only recently became aware of this fact. The State of Arkansas opposes the motion to ___________ No. 95-2579

___________ David Preston Pardue, *
* Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Larry Norris, Director, * Arkansas Department of * [PUBLISHED] Correction, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 9, 1996 Filed: January 24, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

David Preston Pardue appeals the denial of his second 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for abuse of the writ. We affirm.

Pardue was convicted of robbery of a Wal-Mart store in 1987. His conviction was affirmed on appeal. He filed his first petition for habeas corpus relief in 1989, alleging newly discovered evidence relating to eyewitness identification. In the present petition, Pardue challenges the lawfulness of his arrest and asserts ineffective assistance of counsel. 1supplement the record, but nonetheless offers the affidavit of Pardue's attorney. In that affidavit, she states that Pardue knew of her relationship to the Walton family at the time of his first habeas corpus petition. Pardue has shown no reason why these materials were not presented to the district court, in spite of several opportunities to present them--e.g., in response to a show cause order, or as part of an objection to the magistrate's findings. Accordingly, Pardue's motion to supplement the record is denied. We add that if we were to consider the evidence, it would not change this outcome.
-2- A second or successive petition for habeas corpus must be dismissed as an abuse of the writ unless the petitioner can show external cause and prejudice or a fundamental miscarriage of justice. McCleskey v. Zant , 499 U.S. 467. 493-94 (1991). Pardue has not shown that he lacked a factual or legal basis to raise his claims in the first petition or that anything else prevented him from doing so.

After consideration of Pardue's arguments on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's well reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECITON 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Theundersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of AmeriVest Properties Inc., aMaryland real estate investment trust (the “Issuer”), hereby certifies that theAnnual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) of the Issuer forthe year ended December 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78 m(a)) and thatthe information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer
|        | By:    | /s/ KATHRYN L. HALE        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|   |   | Kathryn L. Hale            |
|   |   | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

March 16, 2006

----
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 3, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 131635 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 131635 COA: 269892 Kent CC: 05-004985-FH JOHN FITZGERALD STEVENS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion by defendant-appellant for dismissal of his application for leave to appeal is considered, and the app lication for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice.

p1031 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 3, 2006

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21798]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Indian Health Service


Preventing Alcohol-Related Deaths (PARD) Through Social 
Detoxification; Extension of Due Dates

AGENCY: Indian Health Service, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; extension of due dates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Indian Health Service published a notice in the Federal 
Register (FR) on August 14, 2017, for the Fiscal Year 2017 Preventing 
Alcohol-Related Deaths (PARD) through Social Detoxification program, 
Funding Announcement Number: HHS-2017-IHS-PARD-0001. Several Key Dates 
have been modified.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gettys, Grant Systems 
Coordinator, 5600 Fishers Lane, Mail Stop: 09E70, Rockville, MD 20857, 
Phone: (301) 443-2114; or the Division of Grants Management main line 
(301) 443-5204, or Fax: (301) 594-0899.

Correction

    In the FR notice of August 14, 2017 (FR 2017-17102), the 
corrections are:
    On page 37877, in the first column, under the heading Key Dates, 
the correction for Application Deadline Date, Review Date, Earliest 
Anticipated Start Date, Signed Tribal Resolutions Due Date, and Proof 
of Non-Profit Status Due Date should read as:
    <bullet> Application Deadline Date: September 18, 2017.
    <bullet> Review Date: September 19, 2017.
    <bullet> Earliest Anticipated Start Date: September 30, 2017
    <bullet> Signed Tribal Resolutions Due Date: September 18, 2017.
    <bullet> Proof of Non-Profit Status Due Date: September 18, 2017.

    Dated: September 29, 2017.
Michael D. Weahkee,
 RADM, Assistant Surgeon General, U.S. Public Health Service, Acting 
Director, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-21798 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4160-16-P
Ex. 10.1 Performance Share Amendment






Exhibit 10.1


KIMBALL ELECTRONICS, INC.
ANNUAL AND/OR LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARD AMENDMENT


This Amendment (“Amendment”) is dated December 2, 2014 by and between Kimball Electronics, Inc.  (“Company”), and ________________ (“Recipient”) pursuant to the terms of certain Annual and/or Long-Term Performance Share Award Agreements as noted below (“Agreements”).
WHEREAS Recipient has been previously awarded by Kimball International, Inc. certain Annual and/or Long-Term Performance Share Awards (“Awards”), some of which remain outstanding, as follows:
	
			
	Performance Share Type
	Date of Award Agreement
	KII Share Awards Outstanding

	Long Term
	 
	 

	Long Term
	 
	 

	Long Term
	 
	 

	Long Term
	 
	 

	Long Term
	 
	 

	Annual
	 
	 






AND WHEREAS each of such Agreements made provision for the appropriate equitable adjustment of the Awards in the event of a reorganization, sale, merger, consolidation or other similar transaction in a manner as the Compensation and Governance Committee of Kimball International, Inc. (“Committee”) might select.
AND WHEREAS Kimball International, Inc. completed a Spin-off transaction of its electronics business by a dividend of the common stock of the Company on October 31, 2014.
AND WHEREAS the Committee has determined that an appropriate equitable adjustment of the Awards as a result of the Spin-off is to multiply each outstanding Award by a factor of 1.94.
Now therefore, in consideration of these premises, the Company and Recipient hereby agree as follows:
AWARDS
The Awards shall be adjusted in the amounts as noted below, to be granted in shares of Company common stock:
	
				
	Performance Share Type
	KII Share Awards Outstanding
	Adjustment Factor
	Adjusted KE Share Awards Outstanding

	Long Term
	 
	1.94
	 

	Long Term
	 
	1.94
	 

	Long Term
	 
	1.94
	 

	Long Term
	 
	1.94
	 

	Long Term
	 
	1.94
	 

	Annual
	 
	1.94
	 






SHARES OF AWARDS
Shares of the Awards received will be determined by the applicable bonus percentages as noted in each of the Agreements computed under the Company’s Profit Sharing Incentive Bonus Plan for the applicable fiscal year(s) ending June 30 - beginning with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015.









ASSIGNMENT AND OTHER TERMS
Each of the Agreements shall be considered assigned to the Company.  All other terms and conditions of the Agreements, except as modified by this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Recipient have agreed to the terms and conditions of this Amendment all as of the day and date first above written.


	
					
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ John H. Kahle
	 
	By:
	 

	 
	The Company
John H. Kahle
Vice President,
General Counsel, Secretary
Kimball Electronics, Inc.
	 
	 
	Recipient
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such schedules.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  608,654
<ALLOWANCES>                                   134,902
<INVENTORY>                                    269,923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               895,386
<PP&E>                                         523,382
<DEPRECIATION>                                 456,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,724,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,998,631
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,426,000
<COMMON>                                       4,196,933
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,317,143)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,694,210
<SALES>                                        1,200,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,200,713
<CGS>                                          678,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,082,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               39,241
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               78,504
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             39,950
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            78,504
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   78,504
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04



</TABLE>