alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          29,384
<SECURITIES>                                     3,148
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,149
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,600
<INVENTORY>                                     34,117
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,825
<PP&E>                                          21,176
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,934
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           193
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   172,479
<SALES>                                        213,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               213,159
<CGS>                                          118,263
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,546
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,554
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,982
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,572
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,572
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.32
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.6 March 29, 2005 Graham Perkins
3235 Navy Drive
Oak Hill, VA 20171 Re: COBRA and Office Space Dear Graham: Recently, you received a letter confirming your eligibility to participate in LCCs 2005 Annual
Incentive Plan, including details of your target incentive amount. Following on that communication, I wanted also to confirm the details of your agreement with LCC
International, Inc. regarding payment of COBRA premiums and loaned office space:  1.
    LCC will pay in full the monthly premium for the continuance of your current medical
and dental care elections via COBRA through December 31st, 2005.2.
    LCC will provide, at no cost to you, one (1) furnished office for your personal use.
This office space will be provided indefinitely or until the sooner of a) your voluntary
vacancy of the space or b) lack of availability of office space unoccupied by paying
tenants. LCC reserves the right to relocate this office at any time or at any frequency in
order to accommodate paying lessees. Graham, if you have any questions regarding the information above, please do not hesitate to
contact me. Best regards, /s/ Terri Terri Feely
Vice President, Human Resources & Administration
LCC International, Inc.
(703) 873-2399 direct
#### James McCord, Respondent, v American Golf, Inc., Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 22]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated May 16, 1997, which, in effect, granted the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability upon the defen*350dant’s default in timely answering the complaint and directed an inquest on damages, and (2) an order of the same court, also dated May 16, 1997, which denied the defendant’s motion to vacate the plaintiffs note of issue and strike the case from the calendar.

Ordered that the appeal from the order denying the defendant’s motion to vacate the plaintiffs note of issue and strike the case from the calendar is dismissed as abandoned and as academic since the plaintiff never filed a note of issue; and it is further,

Ordered that the order which, in effect, granted the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment is reversed, the cross motion is denied, the defendant’s opposition papers are deemed an application for leave to vacate its default in timely answering the complaint, the application is granted, and the answer annexed to those opposition papers is deemed timely served; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The defendant demonstrated both a reasonable excuse for the delay in serving its answer and a meritorious defense. Moreover, the defendant’s delay in serving its answer was relatively short, and the plaintiff has not demonstrated any prejudice as a result of this short delay. Thus, the Supreme Court erred in granting the plaintiffs cross motion and in failing to vacate the defendant’s default in answering (see, *Paradiso & Assocs. v Tamarin,*210 AD2d 386; *Walter v Rockland Armor & Metal Corp.,*140 AD2d 335; *Wagenknecht v Government Empls. Ins. Co.,*97 AD2d 407).

The defendant’s contention that it is entitled to dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c) is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman, Krausman and Lerner, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02



                       [PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LETTERHEAD]

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No's. 33-88446, 33-88448, 333-39573, 333-28813,
333-87347, 333-50042, 333-56768, and 333-58262) of CyberGuard Corporation of
our report dated August 27, 1999 relating to the financial statements which
appear in this Form 10-K.



/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-----------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
September 27, 2001
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7627 

HARRY E. WALKUP, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM HAINES, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, Chief

District Judge. (CA-04-1283)

Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 3, 2006

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry E. Walkup, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*The district court entered its order on September 30, 2005.

Walkup has neither filed an amended § 2254 petition nor withdrawn

his § 2254 petition, and no final order has been issued.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Harry E. Walkup, Jr., filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition challenging his West Virginia state court convictions. He

seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate

judge’s recommendation and denying Walkup’s motion to excuse

exhaustion of state court remedies, granting Respondent’s motion to

dismiss with respect to Walkup’s motion to excuse exhaustion, and

giving Walkup twenty days to file an amended § 2254 petition

containing only exhausted claims or to withdraw his § 2254 petition

in its entirety.* This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

The order Walkup seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

I, Nicholas J. Benson, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 

 

  1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunterra Corporation; 

 

  2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report; 

 

  3.    Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 

 

  4.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

  a.    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

  b.    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

  c.    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

  5.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control offinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

 

  a.    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control of financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

  b.    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls. 

 

/S/    NICHOLAS J. BENSON

----
----

|   | a) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m(a)      or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the  Report. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 14,      2008 | /s/ Michael A. Trinidad  |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                    | Michael      A. Trinidad |

----
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2842 

To rescind all stimulus funds that remain unobligated. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2009 

Mr. TIAHRT (for himself, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. JONES, Mr. LAMBORN, and Mr. 

ROHRABACHER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To rescind all stimulus funds that remain unobligated. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED STIMULUS 

4 FUNDS. 

5 Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

6 there are rescinded all unobligated balances of the discre7 tionary appropriations made available by division A of the 

8 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public 

9 Law 111–5). 

Æ 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WILSONS THE
LEATHER EXPERTS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF APRIL 29, 2000 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED APRIL 29, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                          71,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,459
<ALLOWANCES>                                       817
<INVENTORY>                                     84,897
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,844
<PP&E>                                          69,793
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 226,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,518
<BONDS>                                         30,590
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           167
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   226,486
<SALES>                                         90,308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,308
<CGS>                                           60,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,003
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (477)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,257)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (503)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (754)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (623)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,377)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2616 

To authorize the Attorney General to award grants to eligible entities to 

prevent or alleviate community violence by providing education, mentoring, and counseling services to children, adolescents, teachers, families, 

and community leaders on the principles and practice of nonviolence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2009 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia (for himself, Mr. FILNER, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. 

STARK, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Ms. 

WOOLSEY, Mr. WEXLER, Mrs. LOWEY, and Mr. MCDERMOTT) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

Labor 

A BILL 

To authorize the Attorney General to award grants to eligible 

entities to prevent or alleviate community violence by 

providing education, mentoring, and counseling services 

to children, adolescents, teachers, families, and community leaders on the principles and practice of nonviolence. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing American 

5 Families by Educating and Training Youth (SAFETY) 

6 Through Nonviolence Act of 2009’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2616 IH

1 SEC. 2. GRANTS TO EDUCATE AMERICANS ABOUT THE 

2 PRINCIPLES OF NONVIOLENCE. 

3 (a) GRANTS.—The Attorney General may make 

4 grants to eligible entities to prevent or alleviate the effects 

5 of community violence by providing education, mentoring, 

6 and counseling to youth regarding the principles and ap7 plication of nonviolence in conflict resolution. 

8 (b) PRIORITY.—In awarding grants under this sec9 tion, the Secretary shall give priority to applicants that 

10 agree to use the grant in 1 or more eligible urban, rural, 

11 Tribal, and suburban communities that can certify— 

12 (1) an increase in community, especially youth 

13 violence; and 

14 (2) lack the monetary or other resources to ad15 dress violence prevention. 

16 (c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary may not make a 

17 grant to an eligible entity under this section unless the 

18 entity agrees to use not more than 40 percent of such 

19 grant for nonviolence-prevention education and program 

20 development. 

21 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

22 (1) The term ‘‘eligible entity’’ means a State or 

23 local government entity, educational institution, non24 profit, or faith-based organization. 

25 (2) The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

26 of Health and Human Services. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2616 IH

1 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—To carry 

2 out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated 

3 $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years from 2010 through 

4 2015. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 3, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00046

- CV

ESTATE OF MARIA F. HERNANDEZ DECEASED,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PC

- 1030

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

We order appellees to file a response to appellants’ Motion for Review of Excessive

Supersedeas Bond. We order that the written response be filed in this court on or before

February 13, 2014

.

We order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on all pro se parties, all

counsel, and the probate court.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                       602
<INVENTORY>                                      3,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,113
<PP&E>                                           5,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                     928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,930
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,229
<SALES>                                          6,832
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,832
<CGS>                                            4,534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      8
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  3
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (No. 333-04969) pertaining to the 1996 Key Employee Stock Option
Plan of our report dated February 2, 2001 (except Note 16, as to which the
date is April 12, 2001), with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Polymer Group, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 30, 2000.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Greenville, South Carolina
April 12, 2001
---

Exhibit 13

CONSENT OF EXPERT February 24, 2011 British Columbia Securities CommissionAlberta Securities CommissionSaskatchewan Financial Services CommissionManitoba Securities CommissionOntario Securities CommissionNew Brunswick Securities CommissionNova Scotia Securities CommissionRegistrar of Securities, Prince Edward IslandSecurities Commission of Newfoundland and LabradorRegistrar of Securities, Northwest TerritoriesRegistrar of Securities, NunavutRegistrar of Securities, YukonUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Re:
     **Annual Information Form dated February 24, 2011 (the Annual Information Form) of Minefinders Corporation Inc. (the Company).**
  I refer to the report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Minable Reserve for the Dolores Gold-Silver Project, Chihuahua State, Mexico" dated March 25, 2008 (the "Report") as referenced in the Annual Information Form and documents incorporated by reference therein. This letter is being filed as my consent to the use of my name and the Report in the Annual Information Form and in documents incorporated by reference therein. I confirm that I have read the Annual Information Form and I have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations that are derived from the Report referred to above or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services I performed in connection with such Report. I consent to the filing of this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Companys Form 40-F dated February 24, 2011, and any amendment thereto, including post-effective amendments and as part of a post-effective amendment to the Companys Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-170839), to incorporate the Companys Form 40-F dated February 24, 2011. Yours truly, Gustavson Associates, LLC   Donald E. Hulse, P.E.
Principal Mine Engineer 5757 Central Ave Suite D Boulder, CO 80301 USA +1 (303) 443-2209 FAX +1 (303) 443-3156Mining Office: 274 Union Boulevard Suite 450 Lakewood, CO 80228 USA +1 (720) 407-4062 FAX +1 (720) 407-4067
http://www.gustavson.com        gustavson@gustavson.com


---