Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices 46965 

14See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From 

the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not 

in Harmony With Final Determination, 81 FR 59603 

(August 30, 2016). 

15On September 21, 2016, the Department 

published the final results of a changed 

circumstances review with respect to OCTG from 

Korea, finding that Hyundai Steel Corporation is the 

successor-in-interest to Hyundai HYSCO for 

purposes of determining antidumping duty cash 

deposits and liabilities. See Notice of Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances 

Review: Oil Country Tubular Goods From the 

Republic of Korea, 81 FR 64873 (September 21, 

2016). Hyundai Steel Company is also known as 

Hyundai Steel Corporation and Hyundai Steel Co. 

Ltd. 

1The NSR was requested by Carlstar Group LLC 

(formerly dba CTP Transportation Products) 

(Carlstar Group), a U.S. producer of OTR tires, and 

an importer of subject merchandise concerning 

merchandise produced by Carlisle Meizhou, its 

affiliated producer of OTR tires from the PRC, and 

exported by CTP HK, an affiliated trading company 

located in Hong Kong (collectively, Carlstar). 

2See letter from Carlstar, ‘‘New Pneumatic OffThe-Road Tires from the People’s Republic of China 

Entry of Appearance and Request for New Shipper 

Review,’’ dated September 20, 2016 (NSR Request); 

see also Initiation of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review, 81 FR 76560 (November 3, 2016) 

(NSR Initiation). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 81 FR 

78778 (November 9, 2016) (Initiation Notice). The 

Department initiated on the following: Cheng Shin 

Rubber Industry Ltd. (Chengshin), Guizhou Tyre 

Co., Ltd., Guizhou Tyre Import and Export Co., Ltd. 

(GTC), Qingdao Milestone Tyres Co. Ltd. 

(Milestone), Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co. Ltd. 

(Qihang), Shandong Zhentai Group Co., Ltd. 

(Zhentai), Trelleborg Wheel Systems (Xingtai) Co., 

Ltd. (TWS), Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co., Ltd. 

(Zhongwei), Weifang Jintongda Tyre Co., Ltd. 

(Jintongda), and Zhongce Rubber Group Company 

Limited (Zhongce). The Department previously 

collapsed GTC and Guizhou Tyre Import and 

Export Corporation (GTCIE) into a single entity in 

the original investigation, see Certain New 

Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires from the People’s 

Republic of China; Preliminary Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement 

of Final Determination, 73 FR 9278, 9283 (February 

20, 2008), unchanged in Certain New Pneumatic 

Off-The-Road Tires from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value and Partial Affirmative 

Determination of Critical Circumstances, 73 FR 

40485 (July 15, 2008). This decision is 

unchallenged in the instant review; thus, the 

Department continues to treat GTC and GTCIE as 

a single entity (collectively, GTC). 

which they were reviewed; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

investigation but the producer is, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; (4) 

the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 5.24 percent,14 the all-others rate 

established in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Department’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

The Department is issuing and 

publishing these results in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: October 2, 2017. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

Performing the Non-Exclusive Functions and 

Duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 1 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

5. Rates for Non-Examined Companies 

6. Duty Absorption 

7. Affiliation 

8. Discussion of the Methodology 

9. Currency Conversion 

10. Recommendation 

Appendix 2 

List of Companies Not Individually 

Examined 

BDP International 

Daewoo America 

Daewoo International Corporation 

Dong-A Steel Co. Ltd. 

Dong Yang Steel Pipe 

Dongbu Incheon Steel 

DSEC 

Erndtebruecker Eisenwerk and Company 

Hansol Metal 

Husteel Co., Ltd. 

Hyundai HYSCO 

Hyundai Steel Company 15

ILJIN Steel Corporation 

Jim And Freight Co., Ltd. 

Kia Steel Co. Ltd. 

KSP Steel Company 

Kukje Steel 

Kurvers 

POSCO Daewoo Corporation 

POSCO Daewoo America 

Steel Canada 

Sumitomo Corporation 

TGS Pipe 

Yonghyun Base Materials 

ZEECO Asia 

[FR Doc. 2017–21749 Filed 10–6–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–912] 

Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road 

Tires From the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Preliminary Rescission of 

New Shipper Review; 2015–2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Department) is conducting an 

administrative review (AR) and a new 

shipper review (NSR) of the 

antidumping duty order on certain new 

pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR tires) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(PRC). The period of review (POR) for 

the AR and NSR is September 1, 2015, 

through August 31, 2016. The 

administrative review covers six 

exporters of the subject merchandise. 

We preliminarily determine that Weihai 

Zhongwei Rubber Co., Ltd. (Zhongwei), 

one of three companies selected for 

individual examination, made sales of 

subject merchandise in the United 

States at prices below normal value 

(NV) during the POR. We also 

preliminarily determine to rescind the 

new shipper review initiated for Carlisle 

(Meizhou) Rubber Manufacturing Co., 

Ltd. (Carlisle Meizhou), and CTP 

Distribution (HK) Limited (CTP HK) 

(collectively, Carlstar). We invite 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective October 10, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex 

Rosen, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7814. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 3, 2016, the Department 

initiated a new shipper review of 

exports of subject merchandise made by 

CTP Distribution (HK) Limited (CTP 

HK), produced in the PRC by Carlisle 

(Meizhou) Rubber Manufacturing Co., 

Ltd. (Carlisle Meizhou).1 2 On November 

9, 2016, the Department initiated the 

eighth administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on OTR tires 

from the PRC.3 On March 2, 2017, the 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
46966 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices 

4See memorandum to the file, ‘‘Waiver of Time 

Limits for New Shipper Review and Align with 

Concurrent Administrative Review,’’ dated March 

2, 2017 (Alignment Memo). 5See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires 

from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 16348 

(April 4, 2017). 6See memorandum to Gary Taverman, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Certain New 

Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of 2015–2016 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper 

Review,’’ dated May 17, 2017. 

7See memorandum to Gary Taverman, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the 

non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, 

‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Rescission of New Shipper Review: 

Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the 

People’s Republic of China; 2015–2016,’’ dated 

concurrently with and hereby adopted by this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

8For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

9See memorandum to the file, ‘‘New Shipper 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on New 

Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission 

Memorandum for Carlstar,’’ dated concurrently 

with this memorandum (Preliminary NSR 

Rescission Memorandum). 

10See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

11See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires 

From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 

2013, 80 FR 20197 (April 15, 2015). 

12These companies include the mandatory 

respondent, Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd and Guizhou 

Tyre Import and Export Co., Ltd. (GTC), separate 

rate applicant, Cheng Shin Rubber Industry Ltd., 

and non-responsive respondent, Qingdao Milestone 

Tyres Co. Ltd. 

Department aligned the NSR with the 

AR.4 On April 4, 2017, the Department 

rescinded the review for three exporters 

for which the AR was initiated.5 On 

May 17, 2017, we extended the time 

limit for the preliminary results of 

review by 120 days, pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), to October 2, 2017.6

For a complete description of the events 

that followed the initiation of these 

reviews, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.7 A list of topics included 

in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

Appendix to this notice. 

Scope of the Order 8

The merchandise covered by this 

order includes new pneumatic tires 

designed for off-the-road and offhighway use, subject to certain 

exceptions. The subject merchandise is 

currently classifiable under Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) subheadings: 4011.20.10.25, 

4011.20.10.35, 4011.20.50.30, 

4011.20.50.50, 4011.61.00.00, 

4011.62.00.00, 4011.63.00.00, 

4011.69.00.00, 4011.92.00.00, 

4011.93.40.00, 4011.93.80.00, 

4011.94.40.00, and 4011.94.80.00. The 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes 

only; the written product description of 

the scope of the order is dispositive. 

Preliminary Rescission of the New 

Shipper Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.214(c), an exporter or producer may 

request a NSR within one year of the 

date on which subject merchandise was 

first entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption, or, if the 

exporter or producer cannot establish 

the date of the first entry, then the date 

on which it first shipped the 

merchandise for export to the United 

States. 

As discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum and Preliminary 

NSR Rescission Memorandum,9 the 

Department preliminarily finds that 

Carlstar’s request for review was not 

timely filed within one year of the date 

the subject merchandise produced and 

exported by Carlstar or its predecessor 

was first entered into the United States, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(c) of the 

Department’s regulations. 

Because we find that Carlstar’s 

request for review was not timely filed, 

we are preliminarily determining that 

Carlstar’s request did not meet the 

requirements of 19 CFR 351.214(c), and 

are rescinding the new shipper review 

for Carlstar. Because much of the factual 

information used in our analysis 

involves business proprietary 

information, a full discussion of the 

basis for our preliminary determination 

is set forth in the Preliminary NSR 

Rescission Memorandum. 

Separate Rates 

The Department preliminarily 

determines that information placed on 

the record by the mandatory 

respondent, Zhongwei, as well as two 

separate rate applicants, Qihang and 

Shandong Zhentai, demonstrates that 

these companies are entitled to receive 

separate rates. For additional 

information, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

PRC-Wide Entity 

The Department’s policy regarding 

conditional review of the PRC-wide 

entity applies to these reviews.10 Under 

this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not 

be under review unless a party 

specifically requests, or the Department 

self-initiates, a review of the entity. 

Because no party requested a review of 

the PRC-wide entity in the AR or NSR, 

the entity is not under review and the 

entity’s rate (i.e., 105.31 percent) is not 

subject to change.11 Aside from the 

separate rate companies discussed 

above, the Department considers all 

other companies 12 for which a review 

was requested, including the mandatory 

respondent GTC, to be ineligible for a 

separate rate based on information 

provided. For additional information, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Methodology 

The Department is conducting these 

reviews in accordance with section 

751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act. 

Export and constructed export prices 

were calculated in accordance with 

sections 772(a) and (b) of the Act. 

Because the PRC is a nonmarket 

economy within the meaning of section 

771(18) of the Act, normal value (NV) 

has been calculated in accordance with 

section 773(c) of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov, and is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the Internet at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The 

signed Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

versions of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Rate for Separate Rate Companies Not 

Individually Examined 

The statute and the Department’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

respondents not selected for individual 

examination when the Department 

limits its examination of companies 

subject to the administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the 

Act. Generally, the Department looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices 46967 

13See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews 

in Part, 73 FR 52823, 52824 (September 11, 2008), 

and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 16. 

14See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews 

in Part, 73 FR 52823, 52824 (September 11, 2008), 

and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 16. 

15See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

16See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1)–(2). 

17See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2). 

18See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing 

requirements). 

19See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

20See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

21See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

22See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012) (Assessment Rate Modification) 

in the manner described in more detail in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

23See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

24See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

25See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

26For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011). 

all-others rate in an investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the rate for 

respondents not individually examined 

in an administrative review. Section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act articulates a 

preference for not calculating an allothers rate using rates which are zero, 

de minimis or based entirely on facts 

available (FA).13 Accordingly, the 

Department’s usual practice has been to 

determine the dumping margin for 

companies not individually examined 

by averaging the weighted-average 

dumping margins for the individually 

examined respondents, excluding rates 

that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available.14 Consistent 

with this practice, in the AR, we 

preliminarily calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin for Zhongwei 

that is above de minimis and not based 

entirely on FA; therefore, the 

Department preliminarily assigns to 

Qihang and Zhentai the weightedaverage margin calculated for Zhongwei 

as the separate rate for this review. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

The Department preliminarily 

determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period September 1, 2015, through 

August 31, 2016: 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co., 

Ltd ......................................... 4.54 

Shandong Zhentai Group Co., 

Ltd ......................................... 4.54 

Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co. Ltd .. 4.54 

Additionally, the Department 

preliminarily determines that Cheng 

Shing, GTC, and Qingdao Milestone are 

part of the PRC-wide entity. 

Disclosure, Public Comment and 

Opportunity To Request a Hearing 

The Department intends to disclose 

the calculations used in our analysis to 

parties in these reviews within five days 

of the date of publication of this notice 

in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs within 30 days after the date of 

publication of these preliminary results 

of review in the Federal Register.15

Rebuttals to case briefs, which must be 

limited to issues raised in the case 

briefs, must be filed within five days 

after the time limit for filing case 

briefs.16 Parties who submit arguments 

are requested to submit with the 

argument (a) a statement of the issue, (b) 

a brief summary of the argument, and (c) 

a table of authorities.17 Parties 

submitting briefs should do so pursuant 

to the Department’s electronic filing 

system, ACCESS.18

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

this notice.19 Hearing requests should 

contain the following information: (1) 

The party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of the issues 

to be discussed. Oral presentations will 

be limited to issues raised in the briefs. 

If a request for a hearing is made, parties 

will be notified of the time and date for 

the hearing to be held at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230.20

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of these reviews, which will 

include the results of our analysis of all 

issues raised in the case briefs, within 

120 days of publication of these 

preliminary results in the Federal 

Register, pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by these 

reviews.21 The Department intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 

days after the publication date of the 

final results of these reviews. 

For assessment purposes, the 

Department applied the assessment rate 

calculation method adopted in 

Assessment Rate Modification.22 For 

any individually examined respondent 

whose weighted-average dumping 

margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 

percent) in the final results of these 

reviews, the Department will calculate 

importer-specific assessment rates on 

the basis of the ratio of the total amount 

of dumping calculated for the importer’s 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of sales, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importer- 

(or customer-) specific ad valorem rate 

is greater than de minimis, the 

Department will instruct CBP to collect 

the appropriate duties at the time of 

liquidation.23 Where either a 

respondent’s weighted average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis, or an 

importer-(or customer-) specific ad 

valorem rate is zero or de minimis, the 

Department will instruct CBP to 

liquidate appropriate entries without 

regard to antidumping duties.24 For the 

respondents that were not selected for 

individual examination in the 

administrative review and that qualified 

for a separate rate, the assessment rate 

will be based on the average of the 

mandatory respondents.25

Pursuant to the Department’s practice, 

for entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales databases submitted by 

companies individually examined 

during the administrative review, the 

Department will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide 

rate. Additionally, if the Department 

determines that an exporter had no 

shipments of the subject merchandise, 

any suspended entries that entered 

under that exporter’s case number (i.e., 

at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated 

at the PRC-wide rate.26

Because we are preliminarily 

rescinding the new shipper review of 

Carlstar, we are not making a 

determination as to whether Carlstar 

qualifies for a separate rate. Therefore, 

if the Department proceeds to final 

rescission, Carlstar will remain part of 

the PRC-wide entity and, accordingly, 

any entries covered by this new shipper 

review will be assessed at the PRC-wide 

rate. If we do not proceed to final 

rescission, we will calculate an 

importer-specific assessment rate for 

Carlstar, consistent with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1) and will instruct CBP to 

assess AD duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by the NSR if the 

importer-specific assessment rate 

calculated in the final results of the NSR 

is above de minimis. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
46968 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of these 

reviews for shipments of the subject 

merchandise from the PRC entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided by sections 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

companies listed above that have a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be that established in the final results of 

this review (except, if the rate is zero or 

de minimis, then zero cash deposit will 

be required); (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that 

received a separate rate in a prior 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all 

PRC exporters of subject merchandise 

that have not been found to be entitled 

to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate 

will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and 

(4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporter that supplied that non-PRC 

exporter. These deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Because we preliminarily did not 

calculate a dumping margin for Carlstar 

or grant Carlstar a separate rate in this 

new shipper review, as noted above, we 

find that Carlstar continues to be part of 

the PRC-wide entity. The cash deposit 

rate for the PRC-wide entity is 105.31 

percent. These cash deposit 

requirements shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during the POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

and/or countervailing duties occurred 

and the subsequent assessment of 

double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: October 2, 2017. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination To Rescind 

The New Shipper Review 

V. Discussion of Methodology 

A. Non-Market Economy Country 

B. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value 

Data 

C. Surrogate Country 

D. Separate Rates 

E. Margin for the Companies Individually 

Examined 

F. Margin for the Separate Rate Companies 

Not Individually Examined 

G. Margin for Companies Not Receiving a 

Separate Rate 

H. Date of Sale 

I. Comparisons to Normal Value 

J. Export Price 

K. Value-Added Tax 

L. Normal Value 

M. Factor Valuations 

N. Currency Conversion 

VI. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the 

Act 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2017–21748 Filed 10–6–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM 

PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR 

SEVERELY DISABLED 

Procurement List; Proposed Deletions 

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From 

People Who Are Blind or Severely 

Disabled. 

ACTION: Proposed deletions from the 

Procurement List. 

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing 

to delete products and a service from 

the Procurement List that were 

previously furnished by nonprofit 

agencies employing persons who are 

blind or have other severe disabilities. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before November 5, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase 

From People Who Are Blind or Severely 

Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 

715, Arlington, Virginia 22202–4149. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

further information or to submit 

comments contact: Amy B. Jensen, 

Telephone: (703) 603–7740, Fax: (703) 

603–0655, or email CMTEFedReg@

AbilityOne.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice is published pursuant to 41 

U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51–2.3. Its 

purpose is to provide interested persons 

an opportunity to submit comments on 

the proposed actions. 

Deletions 

The following products and service 

are proposed for deletion from the 

Procurement List: 

Products 

NSN(s)—Product Name(s): 

6532–00–926–9964—Smock, Mans Dental 

Operating 

6532–00–926–9975—Smock, Mans Dental 

Operating 

6532–00–926–9976—Smock, Mans Dental 

Operating 

6532–00–159–4881—Smock, Mans Dental 

Operating 

Mandatory Source(s) of Supply: Human 

Technologies Corporation, Utica, NY 

Contracting Activity: Defense Logistics 

Agency Troop Support 

NSN(s)—Product Name(s): 

5510–00–NSH–0044—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0045—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0046—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0047—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0048—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0049—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0050—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0051—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0052—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0053—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0054—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0055—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0056—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0057—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0058—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0059—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0060—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0061—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0062—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0063—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0064—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0065—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0066—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 

5510–00–NSH–0067—Stakes/Lath, Survey, 

Wood 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES