alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 FOR JUNO ACQUISITIONS, INC.
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          70,188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,188
<PP&E>                                             113
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,286
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           814
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,829
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,170)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,170)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             1368566
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   2139973
<PP&E>                                             2820150
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (378031)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    16564149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              6941122
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          20160741
<OTHER-SE>                                       (10537714)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      16564149
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    282977
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   41759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (323383)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (323383)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (323383)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0 <F1>


<FN>
Fully diluted EPS not computed on loss
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2954 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2954

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend the authority of 
the Secretary of Homeland Security to waive certain requirements under 
           the visa waiver program for an additional 2 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2009

 Mr. Quigley (for himself, Mr. Lipinski, and Mr. Gutierrez) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend the authority of 
the Secretary of Homeland Security to waive certain requirements under 
           the visa waiver program for an additional 2 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY.

    Section 217(c)(8)(A)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1187(c)(8)(A)(iii)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``June 30, 2009'' and inserting ``June 30, 
        2011''; and
            (2) by striking ``July 1, 2009'' and inserting ``July 1, 
        2011''.
                                 <all>
```
In the Senate of the United States, 

December 10, 2010. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 2941) entitled ‘‘An Act to reauthorize and enhance Johanna’s Law to increase public awareness and 

knowledge with respect to gynecologic cancers.’’, do pass with 

the following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: 

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF 

2 JOHANNA’S LAW. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 317P(d) of the Public 

4 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247b–17(d)(4)) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) in paragraph (4), by inserting after ‘‘2009’’ 

7 the following: ‘‘and $18,000,000 for the period of fis8 cal years 2012 through 2014’’; and 

9 (2) by redesignating paragraph (4) as para10 graph (6). 
2 

† HR 2941 EAS 

1 (b) CONSULTATION WITH NONPROFIT GYNECOLOGIC

2 CANCER ORGANIZATIONS.—Section 317P(d) of such Act (42 

3 U.S.C. 247b–17(d)), as amended by subsection (a), is fur4 ther amended by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(4) CONSULTATION WITH NONPROFIT

7 GYNECOLOGIC CANCER ORGANIZATIONS.—In carrying 

8 out the national campaign under this subsection, the 

9 Secretary shall consult with nonprofit gynecologic 

10 cancer organizations, with a mission both to conquer 

11 ovarian or other gynecologic cancer and to provide 

12 outreach to State and local governments and commu13 nities, for the purpose of determining the best prac14 tices for providing gynecologic cancer information 

15 and outreach services to varied populations.’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 2941 

AMENDMENT
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11
                              POLYMER GROUP, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                        (In Thousands, Per Share Data)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Fiscal Year
                                                      ------------------------
                                                       1998    1997     1996
                                                      ------- ------- --------
<S>                                                   <C>     <C>     <C>
Basic and diluted:
  Net income (loss) applicable to common stock (A)... $19,704 $15,428 $ (2,130)
  Weighted average shares outstanding................  32,000  32,000   27,688
  Net income (loss) per common share--basic and
   diluted........................................... $   .62 $   .48 $   (.08)
</TABLE>
--------
(A) Includes cumulative dividends on redeemable preferred stock of
    approximately $3.0 million in 1996.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                       AMENDMENT TO TAX SHARING AGREEMENT


         AMENDMENT TO TAX SHARING AGREEMENT (the "Amendment"), entered into as
of the 19th day of March, 2001, by and between G-I Holdings Inc. (formerly GAF
Building Materials Corporation), a Delaware corporation ("G-I Holdings") and
Building Materials Corporation of America ("BMC").

         WHEREAS, G-I is the successor by merger to GAF Corporation and G-I
Holdings Inc., both of which corporations were parties to the Tax Sharing
Agreement entered into as of the 31st day of January, 1994, by and among GAF
Corporation, G-I Holdings Inc. and BMC (the "Agreement");

         WHEREAS, G-I has become the successor common parent of the affiliated
group of corporations referred to in the Agreement;

         WHEREAS, the total estimated payments made by BMC to G-I with respect
of taxable year 2000 were in excess of the liability of BMC to G-I pursuant to
paragraph 2(b) of the Agreement for such taxable year (the "Excess Payments");

         WHEREAS, on January 5, 2001, G-I filed a voluntary petition for
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey in Newark, New Jersey, and BMC
is not included in the bankruptcy filing;

         WHEREAS, G-I and BMC wish to amend the Agreement to provide for the
offsetting of such Excess Payments against any future obligation of BMC to make
payments to G-I pursuant to the Agreement up to the total amount of the Excess
Payments in consideration of G-I agreeing to continue filing consolidated
federal income tax returns that include the BMC Group (as that term is defined
in the Agreement);

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and of the
mutual covenants contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows:

         1. G-I and BMC reaffirm their rights and obligations under the
Agreement and agree that the Agreement shall remain in effect subject to the
modifications made by this Amendment.

         2. BMC shall be permitted to offset the Excess Payments against any
future obligation of BMC to make payments to G-I under the Agreement up to the
total amount of the Excess Payments.
<PAGE>   2
         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
duly executed as of the date first above written.


                           G-I HOLDINGS INC.

                           By: /s/  Richard A. Weinberg
                               -------------------------------------------------
                                    Richard A. Weinberg
                                    Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                    General Counsel and Secretary

                           BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA

                           By: /s/  John F. Rebele
                               -------------------------------------------------
                                    John F. Rebele
                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WHITNEY K. HALL, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3577

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

 )

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 27, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Kelly P. Butz, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Lisa Lott, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL AP PEALS OF TENNES SEE AT JAC KSON A ssi gne d on Br ie fs S ep te m be r 9, 200 3
ED D IE HOW ARD PITT MA N v. STA TE OF TEN NES SEE Appeal f rom the Circ uit Court for Madison Cou nty No. C02-131 R oger A . P age, Judge

No. W2002-02892-C CA-R 3-P C - F iled March 18, 2004

J OE G. R I L EY , J

. , d i s s en t i n g. Al tho ug h I a g re e wi th many of the c on c lus ion s set fo rt h in the ma jor ity op ini on , I re sp e c tf ull y disag ree with i t s primary conclusion that the pe titioner did not establish ineffec tive assistance of counsel. In my

view, he established defic iency and pre judice. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. C t. 2052, 80 L . Ed. 2d 674 (1984).
Ic on c lud e c ouns e l w a s d e fi c ie nt t o th e pr e jud ic e of the pe tit ion e r i n th e fo llo wi ngre sp e c ts: (1) Fa iling to call Evely

n Donita Shaw to testify

about the numer ous calls she rec eived f rom Ms. Luster. Although the content of the conver sations may have be en hea

rs ay , t h e fa ct that numerous c alls were made would not be h e ar s ay. (2) Fa iling to ca ll Euge nia Pharmer to testify that the victim st at ed after the prel i m i nary

hear ing that he could not at that point “bac k out” of the pr os e c uti on

be c a us e they wo uld g e t hi m f

or “ fa lse so me thi ng .” Ms. Pharmer c ould also corr o b o ra te that the petitioner a nd Ms. Luster we re seeingeac h other. (3) Fa iling to ca ll Office r Smith t o testify that he sea rche d the def

endant f ifteen minutes before the allege d assault and the petit ioner did not have a wea pon. The jury might also infe r fr om suc h testimony that it would be unlikely for the defe ndant to ha

ve enter ed the near

by residenc e and c ommitt ed an a rmed assault af ter he was sea

rche d by a policema

n fiftee n minutes earlier

. (4) Fa ilure to discover

and introdu ce ev idence relating to the victim’s nu m e r o u s c o n v i c t i o n s f

o r c r i m e s i n v o l v i n g d i s h o n e s t y.-2-

Th e state ha s a dv anc e d n o e vid e nc e or argume nt i nd ic a tin g t

h e s e f a ilure s r e late d to ta c tic a l de c isi on s. See ge nerally, Goad v. State, 938 S.W.2d 363, 369 (Tenn. 1996). This is indeed a c lose ca se. More signific antly , i t wa s a cl o s e case at trial. Tria l counsel stated it was one of

the closest ca ses in his care er w ith the jury d el i b erating se vera l hours over a pe ri od of tw o d a y s. Al thou gh any

on e of the a bo ve lis te d d e fi c ie nc ie s mi g ht n ot b e e no ug h to e sta bli sh pr e jud ic e , I be lie ve the c omb inatio n of the de fi c ie nc ie s, a lon g wi th t he oth e r b izarr e fa c ts and cir cumstance s, establish prejudice

. Ac c or din g ly , I

wo uld re ve rs e the jud g me nt o f t he po st- c on vic tio n c ourt

.

______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______________________ J OE G. RI L EY, JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, STATEMENTS
OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND 
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          27,369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  252,481
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,109
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          34,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                     212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 335,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   335,317
<SALES>                                         27,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,028
<CGS>                                           23,956
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,408
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,441
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,866)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (138)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,004)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,004)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.63)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 15, 2011

y0608 

# Order

June 15, 2011

142658

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142658 COA: 293912 Allegan CC: 2008-015937-FH JOSHUA ALLEN YEAKEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consider ed and, it appearing to the Court that the

cases of People v Pullen (Docket No. 142751) and People v Watkins (Docket No. 142031) are pending on appeal before this C ourt and that the decisions in those cases may resolve an issue raised in the present application for le ave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax Credit
Fund II,  L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  for the year ended March 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Thomas J. Riha, Chief Financial  Officer of
WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

Date: August 17, 2007
EXHIBIT
32.1




Certification




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, David Szostak, hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PetroAlgae Inc. for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
PetroAlgae Inc.




/s/
      David SzostakName:
                David
      SzostakTitle:
                President(Principal
      Executive Officer)




Dated:
March 31, 2010




This
certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”).  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

OP 24-0060 

DAVID E. ORR, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, 

LINCOLN COUNTY, HON. MATTHEW J. 

CUFFE, Presiding. 

Respondent. 

ORDER 

FILED 

FEB 2 0 2024 

Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana 

David E. Orr has filed an "Emergency Petition for Writ of Supervisory Control" 

over the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, requesting "reversal of 

wrongful transfer of property" in a civil matter of which Orr provides that he has an appeal. 

We amend the caption to correct the District Court's title. 

Supervisory control may be appropriate on a case-by-case basis. "This 

extraordinary remedy can be invoked when the case involves purely legal questions and 

urgent or emergency factors make the normal appeal process inadequate." State v. Spady, 

2015 MT 218, ¶ 11, 380 Mont. 179, 354 P.3d 590 (citing M. R. App. P. 14(3); Redding v. 

McCarter, 2012 MT 144, ¶ 17, 365 Mont. 316, 281 P.3d 189). 

Supervisory control is not appropriate here. Orr has an appeal of the District Court's 

quiet title decision pending with this Court. Orr v. House, No. DA 23-0699. His instant 

writ is a somewhat modified version of his filed, opening brief. The writ is over-length at 

10,000 words, pursuant to M. R. App. P. 14(5), and it is inappropriate because of the 

pending appeal. M. R. App. P. 14(3). Orr's appeal is his remedy. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that Orr's Emergency Petition for Writ of Supervisory Control is 

DENIED and DISMISSED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is CLOSED as of this Order's date. 

02/20/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0060
The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to: the Honorable Matthew J. 

Cuffe, District Court Judge; counsel of record; and David E. Orr personally. 

DATED this Z-.0 day of February, 2024. 

Justices 

2 

e
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2811 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to include constrictor snakes of 

the species Python genera as an injurious animal. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2009 

Mr. MEEK of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to include constrictor 

snakes of the species Python genera as an injurious animal. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPORTATION OR SHIPMENT OF INJURIOUS 

4 SPECIES. 

5 Section 42(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended in the first sentence by inserting ‘‘; of the con7 strictor snake of the species Python genera’’ after 

8 ‘‘polymorpha’’. 

Æ 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS