alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,533
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,533
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,467)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,533
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,402)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,402)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,402)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0160

_________________ IN THE MATTER OF: T.K., A Youth in Need of Care. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classifie d for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Jon A. Oldenburg, District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 11 2020

11/12/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0160
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 28, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40031 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
MOHAMMED GOUJIL,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Consolidated with:

No. 03-40032 Summary Calendar

UNITES STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MOHAMMED GOUJIL, also known as Ramiro Munoz, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-02-CR-215-1 USDC No. C-01-CR-41-1

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.No. 03-40031 c/w No. 03-40032 - 2 -

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. PER CURIAM: *
Mohammed Goujil appe a ls the revocation of his supervised
release term imposed in connection with his conviction for passport
fraud. Goujil was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 24 months
for the violation. Goujil also appeals his conviction following a jury trial for assault of a federal employee, for which he received

a sentence of a term of imprisonment of 36 months, to run
consecutive to his sentence imposed for the violation of the terms
of his supervised release. Goujil argues that the district court judge plainly erred in both cases in failing to sua sponte recuse
herself based on judic ial bias and prejudice. A review of the
record of all proceedings did not raise any type of inference that
would have led a reasonably obje ctive person to doubt the impartiality of the district court judge. See Levitt v. Univ. of

Texas at El Paso , 847 F.2d 221, 226 (5th Cir. 1988); 28 U.S.C. §
455. There was no indication that any of the district court’s rulings were the result of a deep seated favoritism or antagonism.
The district court did not plainly err in not recusing itself from presiding over the proceedings. See Liteky v. United States , 510
U.S. 540, 550-55. The judgments in both cases are AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                         412,325
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,991,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,703,594
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,649,003
<PP&E>                                       4,502,471
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,335,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,456,224
<BONDS>                                     16,510,415
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          118,636
<PREFERRED>                                         15
<COMMON>                                         7,536
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,242,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,335,570
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,966,781
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,775,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,038,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,237,667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,515,975
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,515,975
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .014
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47545-47546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22035]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Notice of Adjustment of Disaster Grant Amounts

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice of an adjustment to the threshold for Small 
Project subgrants made to state, tribal, and local governments and 
private nonprofit facilities for disasters declared on or after October 
1, 2017.

DATES: This adjustment applies to major disasters and emergencies 
declared on or after October 1, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Logan, Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3834.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207, as amended by the Sandy 
Recovery Improvement Act, Public Law 113-2, provides that FEMA will 
annually adjust the threshold for assistance provided under section 
422, Simplified Procedures, relating to the Public Assistance program, 
to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers 
published by the Department of Labor.
    FEMA gives notice that $125,500 is the threshold for any Small 
Project subgrant made to state, tribal, and local governments or to the 
owner or operator of an eligible private nonprofit facility under 
section 422 of the Stafford Act for all major disasters or emergencies 
declared on or after October 1, 2017.

[[Page 47546]]

    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price 
Index for All Urban Consumers of 1.9 percent for the 12-month period 
that ended in August 2017. This is based on information released by the 
Bureau of Labor Statistics at the U.S. Department of Labor on September 
14, 2017.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters).

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-22035 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47539-47540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21993]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium.
    Date: November 7, 2017.
    Time: 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: David M. Armstrong, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center/Room 6138/MSC 9608, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-3534, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90f1e2fde3e4e2f4f1d0fdf1f9fcbefef9f8bef7ffe6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c3d2e312f282e383d1c313d353072323534723b332a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; PsychENCODE.
    Date: November 8, 2017.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

[[Page 47540]]

    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Vinod Charles, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6151, 
MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-1606, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#15767d7467797066637c5578747c793b7b7c7d3b727a63"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="07646f66756b6274716e476a666e6b29696e6f29606871">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 5, 2017.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-21993 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

UNPUBLISHED 

September 24, 2015 

v No. 314646 

Barry Circuit Court 

DOUGLAS DAVID BLESCH, LC No. 12-000123-FH 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

Before: METER, P.J., and O’CONNELL and SHAPIRO, JJ. 

O’CONNELL, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). 

 I concur with the majority opinion that defendant failed to present prima facie evidence 

of each element of a § 8 affirmative defense1 under the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act 

(MMMA), MCL 333.26421 et seq. I conclude that, as a result, defendant is not entitled to raise a 

§ 8 defense at trial, and further proceedings are not required. 

 In People v Hartwick, ___ Mich ___; ___ NW2d ___ (2015) (Docket Nos. 148444; 

148971), slip op at 31, the Michigan Supreme Court held: 

Additionally, if a defendant has not presented prima facie evidence of each 

element of § 8 by “present[ing] evidence from which a reasonable jury could 

conclude that the defendant satisfied the elements of the § 8 affirmative 

defense, . . . then the circuit court must deny the motion to dismiss the charges,” 

and “the defendant is not permitted to present the § 8 defense to the jury.” [Citing 

People v Kolanek, 491 Mich 382, 416; 817 NW2d 528 (2012).] 

The Supreme Court’s analysis did not change the basic § 8 analysis. A primary caregiver or a 

patient must provide prima facie evidence of all § 8(a) elements for him- or herself and for the 

registered qualifying patients to which he or she is connected under the MMMA in order to use 

the § 8 defense at trial. Since defendant did not establish prima facie evidence of each element 

of the MMMA § 8 defense at his evidentiary hearing, he is not entitled to raise the affirmative 

defense under § 8 of the MMMA at trial. 

 

1

 Specifically, defendant failed to present evidence under § 8(a)(1) for four patients. 
-2- 

 I would reverse the decision of the trial court and remand for further proceedings. 

/s/ Peter D. O’Connell
#### Hugh O’Kane Electric Co., Inc., Appellant, v County of Westchester, Respondent.

[862 NYS2d 804]

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), dated May 8, 2007, as granted those branches of the defendant’s motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the second and third causes of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in response to the defendant’s prima facie showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law based on the unambiguous terms of the contract. The contract should be enforced according to its plain meaning *(see*W.W.W. *Assoc. v Giancontieri,*77 NY2d 157, 162 [1990]; *McGuckin v Snapple Distribs., Inc.,*41 AD3d 795 [2007]). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the defendant’s motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the second and third causes of action. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                        628,935
<SECURITIES>                  0         
<RECEIVABLES>                 137,245          
<ALLOWANCES>                  0        
<INVENTORY>                   299,591          
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1,282,373     
<PP&E>                        8,664,469          
<DEPRECIATION>                3,753,409     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                7,026,021    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         3,527,364     
<BONDS>                       0          
<COMMON>                      148,977
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0         
<PREFERRED>                   1,755,486          
<OTHER-SE>                    0         
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  7,026,021             
<SALES>                       0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              11,297,568           
<CGS>                         6,413,744    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 12,507,994  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              78,699      
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            81,615  
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,289,125)   
<INCOME-TAX>                  0              
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0                 
<DISCONTINUED>                0          
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0         
<CHANGES>                     0          
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,289,125)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (0.09)  
        


</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 
  Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 
  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael Cytrynbaum, President of Central Minera Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Central Minera Corp. for the year ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Central Minera Corp.

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

by: /s/ Michael Cytrynbaum

December 21, 2007

Michael Cytrynbaum 
  President , Central Minera Corp.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Central Minera Corp. and will be retained by Central Minera Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

-30-

Central Minera Form 20F December 2007

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, David Szostak, hereby certify
that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PetroAlgae Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PetroAlgae Inc.



|                  |  |                                                      
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David Szostak
|Name: Title:      |  | David Szostak President (Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: March 31, 2009

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
<PAGE>


32.1              Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                  Financial Officer of VOXEL pursuant to Section 906 of
                  the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of VOXEL (the "Company") for
the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael Anthony,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of VOXEL, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 17, 2008

                                      /s/Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Financial Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2912 

To authorize and request the President to award the congressional Medal 

of Honor posthumously to Captain Felix Sosa-Camejo for his gallant 

and heroic actions during the Vietnam War, ending with his death 

in combat on February 13, 1968. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2009 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. 

LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, and 

Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize and request the President to award the congressional Medal of Honor posthumously to Captain Felix 

Sosa-Camejo for his gallant and heroic actions during 

the Vietnam War, ending with his death in combat on 

February 13, 1968. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2912 IH

1 SECTION 1. POSTHUMOUS AWARD OF CONGRESSIONAL 

2 MEDAL OF HONOR TO CAPTAIN FELIX SOSA3 CAMEJO. 

4 The President is authorized and requested to award 

5 the congressional Medal of Honor posthumously to Cap6 tain Felix Sosa-Camejo of the State of Florida for his ac7 tions during the Vietnam War, ending with his death in 

8 combat on February 13, 1968. Such an award may be 

9 made without regard to the provisions of section 3744 of 

10 title 10, United States Code, and may be made in accord11 ance with award criteria applicable at the time of his 

12 death. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS