alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bank Saderat Iran New York Agency, Appellant, v National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., Respondent.

[665 NYS2d 79]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered January 31, 1997, which, in an action to recover on a fidelity bond, dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant’s documentary evidence established that plaintiff discovered its employee’s dishonesty, and therefore its “loss”, in March 1992; that plaintiff thereafter submitted a proof of loss for a single transaction that defendant accepted as timely, investigated and settled; and that two years later, plaintiff submitted additional proofs of loss for two other transactions involving the same employee. The IAS Court correctly held that these later claims were untimely under the “single loss” discovery and notice provisions of the subject bond (see, *Commodore Intl. v National Union Fire Ins. Co.,*184 AD2d 19, 22), which are unambiguous in requiring that all dishonest transactions in which a particular employee is involved or implicated be considered as single loss for which proof of loss had to be given within six months after discovery of the first loss. It is also clear that under section 12 of the bond, coverage terminated with respect to this employee and all matters in which he was implicated upon discovery of his dishonesty. Plaintiff, *84therefore, had six months from March 1992 to investigate all matters in which this employee was implicated and to include same in its proof of loss. Neither settlement of the claim in the initial matter nor defendant’s investigation of the transactions identified in the untimely proofs of loss constituted waiver of or estoppel against these provisions of the bond *(see, Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co.,*70 NY2d *966).*Nor does it avail plaintiff that the rejected claims were for losses that occurred prior to the accepted claim. We have considered plaintiff’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended  September 30, 1996 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements and Notes, thereto.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                             OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                       2,113,556
<SECURITIES>                                                 1,310,325
<RECEIVABLES>                                                4,249,989
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    89,900
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             7,713,948
<PP&E>                                                         938,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 240,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               9,613,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        2,183,628
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                         5,139
<OTHER-SE>                                                   7,065,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 9,613,173
<SALES>                                                     17,165,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            17,165,836
<CGS>                                                       12,762,977
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               16,656,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              49,215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                729,526
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   858,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             19,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   710,326
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,663
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,292
<PP&E>                                           4,086
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,764)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,524
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           480
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,814
<SALES>                                          2,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,872
<CGS>                                              905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,585)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,585)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Merit Systems Protection Board

          - 5 CFR Part 1201

# AGENCY:

Merit Systems Protection Board.

# ACTION:

Final rule.

# SUMMARY:

The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or the Board) is amending its rules of practice and procedure in this part to reflect the relocation of its Western Regional Office.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 16, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jennifer Everling, Acting Clerk of the Board, Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street NW., Washington, DC 20419; phone: (202) 653-7200; fax: (202) 653-7130; or email:                         *mspb@mspb.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On October 13, 2017, MSPB will relocate its Western Regional Office from 201 Mission Street, San Francisco, CA, to 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA. Appendix II of this part is amended to show the new address. The facsimile number is changing to (510) 273-7136. The geographical areas served by the Western Regional Office are unchanged. The Board is publishing this as a final rule pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1204(h).

# List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 1201

      - Administrative practice and procedure

Accordingly, the Board amends 5 CFR part 1201 as follows:

# PART 1201—PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

1. The authority citation for part 1201 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1204, 1305, and 7701, and 38 U.S.C. 4331, unless otherwise noted.

## Appendix II to Part 1201—[Amended]

2. Amend Appendix II to part 1201 in item 5 by removing “201 Mission Street, Suite 2310, San Francisco, California 94105-1831 Facsimile No.: (415) 904-0580” and adding, in its place, “1301 Clay Street, Suite 1380N, Oakland, California 94612-5217, Facsimile No.: (510) 273-7136.” 

Jennifer Everling,

Acting Clerk of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2017-21890 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7400-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GOLDEN
     BEAR GOLF, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999,
     AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,430,218
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,575,058
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (296,254)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,070,721
<PP&E>                                         1,884,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,257,793)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,515,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (21,387,561)
<BONDS>                                        (2,690,631)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       (55,050)
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,504,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (6,515,385)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               (2,843,331)
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,362,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (10,782)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               48,900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,853
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                508,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                   50,409
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            558,716
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   558,716
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.10



</TABLE>
#### Henry MYERS; Jerome Myers; Gloria Myers, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Walter R. KAUFMANN; Joseph A. Broom; Bettye Dorn, Ctr. Dir. Activebay, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-2237.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 31, 2011.

Decided: April 4, 2011.

Henry Myers, Jerome Myers, Gloria Myers, Appellants Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henry Myers, Jerome Myers, and Gloria Myers appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Myers v. Kaufmann,*No. 0420-2: 2:10-cv-02081-RMG, 2010 WL 4340381 (D.S.C. Oct. 25, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46818-46819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21636]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4340-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Virgin Islands; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-4340-DR), dated 
September 20, 2017, and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 23, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands is

[[Page 46819]]

hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas 
determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a 
major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 20, 
2017.

    The islands of St. John and St. Thomas for Individual Assistance 
(already designated for debris removal and emergency protective 
measures [Categories A and B], including direct federal assistance, 
under the Public Assistance program).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-21636 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
NO. 2013-36599

IN THE MATTER OF § IN THE DISTRICT COURT

THE MARRIAGE OF §

§

SHELIA M. WILLIAMS § 311TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AND §

JEFF D. WILLIAMS § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

NOTICE OF APPEAL

This Notice of Appeal is filed by Jeff D. Williams, Respondent, a party to this proceeding 

who seeks to alter the trial court's judgment or other appealable order.

1. The trial court, cause number, and style of this case are as shown in the caption 

above.

2. The judgment or order appealed from was signed on October 29th, 2014.

3. Jeff D. Williams desires to appeal from all portions of the judgment.

4. This appeal is being taken to either the First or Fourteenth Court of Appeals.

5. This notice is being filed by Jeff D. Williams.

Respectfully submitted,

WALTER P MAHONEY JR

4915 Holly Avenue

Pasadena, Texas 77503

Tel: (281) 998-9450

Fax: (281) 998-9430

By:/s/Walter P. Mahoney Jr. 

Walter P. Mahoney, Jr.

State Bar No. 12844600

trip888@aol.com

Attorney for Jeff D. Williams

ACCEPTED

14-15-00090-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

2/9/2015 12:00:00 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/9/2015 10:26:00 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Certificate of Service

I certify that a true copy of this Notice of Appeal was served in accordance with rule 9.5

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on each party or that party's lead counsel as follows:

Party: Shelia M. Williams

Lead attorney: David Thornton

Address of service: at david@thorntonlawfirm.com

Email Address: dlt@thorntonlawfirm.com

Method of service: by electronic service

Date of service: 1-20-2015

/s/Walter P. Mahoney Jr.

Walter P. Mahoney, Jr.

Attorney for Respondent
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,021-04

EX PARTE LYDELL GRANT, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1288802-C IN THE 351ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. NEWELL, J., not participating.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The First Court of

Appeals affirmed his conviction. Grant v. State, No. 01-02-01173-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st

Dist.] Apr. 1, 2014) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of

habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. SeeTEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that he is actually innocent. See Ex parte Elizondo,

947 S.W.2d 202 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Applicant and the State jointly signed proposed findings

of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court adopted these, concluded that Applicant established

that he is actually innocent, and recommended that we grant him a new trial. We believe that the
2

record should be further developed. The trial court shall order the District Clerk to forward a copy

of Jermarico Carter’s videotaped interview with the Houston Police Department. The District Clerk

shall forward the copy within thirty days from the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 1, 2020

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      27,385,403
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      58,060,492
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                           324,008,829
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                115,865,534
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      39,915,967
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        39,738,507
<LOANS>                                    692,044,631
<ALLOWANCE>                                  4,321,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,422,683,192
<DEPOSITS>                                 702,519,461
<SHORT-TERM>                               571,940,892
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         17,082,028
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    38,489,265
<OTHER-SE>                                  92,651,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,422,683,192
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             50,817,784
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           18,567,794
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            69,385,578
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          24,130,605
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          42,955,386
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       26,430,192
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                4,645,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           8,535,721
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             23,905,526
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             23,587,795
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  23,587,795
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                16,463,726
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.164
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.164
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.34
<LOANS-NON>                                 22,746,669
<LOANS-PAST>                                   226,973
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             26,125,293
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,331,645
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                3,942,697
<RECOVERIES>                                   287,701
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            4,321,649
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         4,321,649
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Silvia Gomez DE ARENAS, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72752.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 15, 2011.

Karla L. Kraus, Esquire, Kraus Law Corporation, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.

Kathryn Deangelis, Karen Y. Stewart, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Silvia Gomez De Arenas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review *748for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, and review de novo questions of law. *Rodriguez-Echeverria v. Mukasey,*534 F.3d 1047, 1050 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Gomez De Arenas knowingly encouraged and assisted another alien in seeking entry to the United States in violation of law. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i); *Altamirano v. Gonzales,*427 F.3d 586, 592 (9th Cir.2005) (requiring an affirmative act of assistance or encouragement in order to establish alien smuggling).

Gomez De Arenas’ claim under 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(c) is unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.