alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

I, Steven E. West, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SunterraCorporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control of financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control offinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4338-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Georgia; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4338-DR), dated September 15, 2017, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 26, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of September 15, 2017.

    Charlton and Coffee Counties for Individual Assistance (already 
designated for debris removal and emergency protective measures 
[Categories A and B], including direct federal assistance, under the 
Public Assistance program).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-21644 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tomar Torres, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 512]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.), rendered April 23, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly denied the defendant’s request to charge petit larceny as a lesser-included offense of robbery in the second degree since no reasonable view of the evidence would have supported the conclusion that the defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater offense *(see, People v White,*121 AD2d 762; *People v France,*216 AD2d 579).

The sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
#### MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, et al., Defendants-Appellants, v. DRUG ASSIST HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., d/b/a Shoppers Drug, Plaintiff-Appellee.

C.A. No. 05-30224 MAP.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Jan. 31, 2006.

James J. Arguin, Attorney General’s Office, Commonwealth of Mass. Government Bureau, Sookyoung Shin, Attorney General’s Office, Boston, MA, for Appellees.

George I. Roumeliotis, Hendel, Collins & Newton, Springfield, MA, for appellant.

*MEMORANDUM AND ORDER*

PONSOR, District Judge.

This is an appeal of an order issued by the Bankruptcy Court on August 12, 2005 granting preliminary injunctive relief to Appellee, Drug Assist Health Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Shoppers Drug (“Drug Assist”). The preliminary injunction enjoined Defendants, and specifically the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Pharmacy (“Board”), “from taking or continuing any act ... to enforce against Drug Assist Health Solutions, Inc. the final decision and revocation order of the Board of Registration in Pharmacy ... of May 27, 2005 revoking [Drug Assist’s] pharmacy license .... ”

The issuance of the preliminary injunction violated 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(4), which states that the filing of a bankruptcy peti*6tion does not stay “the commencement or continuation of an action or proceeding by a governmental unit ... to enforce such governmental unit’s ... police and regulatory power.” As the First Circuit recently explained:

> This exception discourages debtors from submitting bankruptcy petitioners either primarily or solely for the purpose of evading impending governmental efforts to invoke the governmental police powers to enjoin or deter ongoing debtor conduct which would seriously threaten the public safety and welfare ....

*In re McMullen,*386 F.3d 320, 324-25 (1st Cir.2004).

In this case, the action of the Board in revoking the pharmacy license of Drug Assist was clearly an expression of governmental regulatory power intended, in the Board’s mind, to enjoin conduct threatening the public welfare. It is all but conceded that the filing of the bankruptcy petition was intended to assist the debtor in evading or postponing the impact of the license revocation. In these circumstances, the effort by counsel for Drug Assist to invoke 11 U.S.C. § 105(a), and to argue that the Bankruptcy Court’s equitable powers supported issuance of the preliminary injunction, is unpersuasive. This interpretation of § 105(a) would eviscerate § 362(b)(4) and undercut the holding in *In re McMullen.*

For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Bankruptcy Court of August 12, 2005 is hereby REVERSED. The Bankruptcy Court’s preliminary injunction will stay in force, to allow sensible transition, only through February 28, 2006. Thereafter, the preliminary injunction will be void, and the revocation order of the Board will have full effect, unless it is stayed either by the Board itself or by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

It is So Ordered.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0561 

# FILED MAR 2 2 2022 IN THE MATTER OF: A.K. and A.K.,

Youths in Need ofCare. Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Counsel for the appellant mother ofA.K. and A.K. filed a motion and briefasking to be allowed towithdraw from this appeal on groundsthat counsel has beenunableto find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal,pursuant to §46-8-103(2), MCA, andAnders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). The mother was granted time to file a response, but no response was filed. The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA, and Anders. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that could be raised in the mother's appeal in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to the appellant mother personally. DATED this?-2- day ofMarch, 2022.

ChiefJustice 03/22/2022
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES



Innkeepers USA Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the Company), operates principally through two entities, (i) Innkeepers
Financial Corporation, a Virginia corporation (IFC), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and (ii) Innkeepers USA Limited Partnership, a Virginia limited partnership (the Partnership), of which IFC is the sole
general partner. All of the Companys hotels are owned by the Partnership or subsidiary limited partnerships that are owned 99% by the Partnership and 1% by either the Company directly or corporations that are wholly-owned by the Company. The
following table lists all of the subsidiaries of the Company (other than IFC and the Partnership):



|                                            |  |                                        
|------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Innkeepers Financial Corporation II         |  | Innkeepers Residence Grand Rapids, L.P.
|Innkeepers Financial Corporation III        |  | Innkeepers Residence Portland, Inc.    
|Innkeepers Financial Corporation IV         |  | Innkeepers Residence Portland, L.P.    
|Innkeepers Financial Corporation V          |  | Innkeepers Residence San Mateo, Inc.   
|Innkeepers Financing Partnership, L.P.      |  | Innkeepers Residence San Mateo, L.P.   
|Innkeepers Financing Partnership II, L.P.   |  | Innkeepers Residence Shelton, Inc.     
|Innkeepers Financing Partnership III, L.P.  |  | Innkeepers Residence Shelton, L.P.     
|Innkeepers Financing Partnership IV, L.P.   |  | Innkeepers Residence Sili I, L.P       
|Innkeepers Hampton Norcross, Inc.           |  | Innkeepers Residence Sili II, Inc.     
|Innkeepers Hampton Norcross, L.P.           |  | Innkeepers Residence Sili II, L.P.     
|Innkeepers Residence Addison, Inc.          |  | Innkeepers Residence Wichita East, L.P.
|Innkeepers Residence Addison, L.P.          |  | Innkeepers RI Altamonte, Inc.          
|Innkeepers Residence Arlington, Inc.        |  | Innkeepers RI Altamonte, L.P.          
|Innkeepers Residence Arlington, L.P.        |  | Innkeepers RI General, Inc.            
|Innkeepers Residence Atlanta-Downtown, Inc. |  | Innkeepers RI General, L.P.            
|Innkeepers Residence Atlanta-Downtown, L.P. |  | Innkeepers RI Northwest, Inc.          
|Innkeepers Residence Denver-Downtown, L.P.  |  | Innkeepers RI Northwest, L.P.          
|Innkeepers Residence East Lansing Inc.      |  | Innkeepers Schaumburg, L.P.            
|Innkeepers Residence East Lansing L.P.      |  | Innkeepers Summerfield General, L.P.   
|Innkeepers Residence Eden Prairie, Inc.     |  | Innkeepers Summerfield General II, L.P.
|Innkeepers Residence Eden Prairie, L.P.     |  | Innkeepers Sunrise Tinton Falls, L.P.  
|Innkeepers Residence Grand Rapids, Inc.     |  | Innkeepers Westchester, L.P.           
|KPA Leaseco, Inc.                           |  | KPA Leaseco II, Inc.                   
|KPA Leaseco III, Inc.                       |  | KPA Leaseco IV, Inc.                   
|KPA Leaseco V, Inc.                         |  |
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In   connection   with  the   Amended   Quarterly   Report   of  Altair
Nanotechnologies  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly  period
ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  I, William P. Long, Chief Executive  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

         /s/ William P. Long
         -----------------------------
             William P. Long
             Chief Executive Officer

October 18, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2878 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2878

 To authorize microenterprise assistance for renewable energy projects 
                        in developing countries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2009

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize microenterprise assistance for renewable energy projects 
                        in developing countries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may cited as the ``Solar Villages Initiative Act''.

SEC. 2. MICROENTERPRISE ASSISTANCE FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS IN 
              DEVELOPING COUNTRIES.

    (a) In General.--The President, acting through the Administrator of 
the United States Agency for International Development and in 
consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, 
is authorized to provide assistance for renewable energy projects 
described in subsection (b) in developing countries to increase the 
availability of credit, savings, and other services to microfinance and 
microenterprise clients lacking full access to capital, training, 
technical assistance, and business development services.
    (b) Types of Projects.--The renewable energy projects described in 
this subsection include projects to assist small and micro businesses 
that loan or sell solar lanterns or lamps and other solar energy 
technologies.
    (c) Priority.--In providing assistance under subsection (a), the 
President shall give priority to empowering female-owned businesses in 
developing countries.
    (d) Relation to Existing Authorities.--Assistance provided under 
subsection (a) shall be made available under the authorities of section 
252 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2211a).
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the President to carry out this section $10,000,000 for 
fiscal year 2010, $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2011, $15,000,000 for 
fiscal year 2012, $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2013, $20,000,000 for 
fiscal year 2014, and $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2015.
                                 <all>
```
ilg_Ex10_2



		

			Exhibit 10.2

		





		
			AMENDMENT NO. 2
		

		
			TO THE
		

		
			INTERVAL LEISURE GROUP, INC.
		

		
			2013 STOCK AND INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
		

		
			This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”) to the Interval Leisure Group, Inc. 2013 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended (the “Plan”) is dated as of February 25, 2018.
		

		
			R E C I T A L S
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to create more flexibility with regard to the amount of Shares that may be withheld upon settlement of a grant; and
		

		
			WHEREAS, for such purposes, the Plan may be amended by the Administrator, currently the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
		

		
			SECTION 1.  Defined Terms.  Terms used but not defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan.
		

		
			SECTION 2.  Amendment to Section 29. Section 29 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
		

		
			29.  Tax Withholding.
		

		
			Each Participant shall pay to the Company, or make arrangements satisfactory to the Company regarding the payment of, any federal, state, local or foreign taxes of any kind required by law to be withheld with respect to any Award under the Plan no later than the date as of which any amount under such Award first becomes includible in the gross income of the Participant for any tax purposes with respect to which the Company has a tax withholding obligation. Unless otherwise determined by the Company, withholding obligations may be settled with Shares, including Shares that are part of the Award that gives rise to the withholding requirement; provided, however, that not more than the legally allowed maximum withholding may be settled with Shares. The obligations of the Company under the Plan shall be conditional on such payment or arrangements, and the Company and its Affiliates shall, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any such taxes from any vested Shares or any other payment due to the Participant at that time or at any future time. The Administrator may establish such procedures as it deems appropriate, including making irrevocable elections, for the settlement of withholding obligations with Shares.
		

		
			SECTION 3.  Effect of Amendment.  Except as expressly set forth herein, this Amendment shall not alter, modify, amend or in any way affect any of the terms, conditions, obligations or agreements contained in the Plan, all of which are hereby ratified and affirmed in all respects and shall continue in full force and effect.
		

		
			


		 


 



		

		
			SECTION 4.  Effective Date of Amendment.  This Amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2018.
		


		 


		

			2
<PAGE>


31.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
         Officer of VOXEL pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
         Act of 2002

I, Michael Anthony, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of VOXEL;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: June 17, 2008


/s/ Michael Anthony
-----------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Michael Anthony
-----------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Financial Officer