alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL17-79-000]

                    On October 5, 2017, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. EL17-79-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether the rates for Reactive Supply and Voltage Control Service (Reactive Service) of Tilton Energy LLC may be unjust and unreasonable.                     *Tilton Energy LLC,*                     161 FERC 61,023 (2017).                

                    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL17-79-000, established pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL17-79-000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 days of the date of issuance of the order.

Dated: October 5, 2017.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-22008 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2877 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2877

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 76 Brookside Avenue in Chester, New York, as the ``1st Lieutenant 
                       Louis Allen Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1ST LIEUTENANT LOUIS ALLEN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 76 Brookside Avenue in Chester, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``1st Lieutenant Louis Allen Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``1st 
Lieutenant Louis Allen Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 13, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2877

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 76 Brookside Avenue in Chester, New York, as the ``1st Lieutenant 
                       Louis Allen Post Office''.
```
#### Gerardo Antonio FUENTES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72557.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 10, 2011.

Gerardo Antonio Fuentes, Tacoma, WA, pro se.

Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, pro se.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Tracey McDonald, Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr., Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, Suzanne Nardone, Aviva Poczter, Senior Litigation Counsel, Mary Lee Quinn, Esquire, Trial, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gerardo Antonio Fuentes, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions pro se for *735review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his applications for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture.

Fuentes contends that he was persecuted by street gangs when he refused to join their organization, and alleges that the gangs are still actively looking for him. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that the beatings and harassment that Fuentes received from gang members seeking to recruit him did not establish past persecution on account of a protected ground, or a well-founded fear of future persecution. *See Ramos-Lopez v. Holder,*563 F.3d 855, 858 (9th Cir.2009) (holding that young men who resist gang recruitment do not constitute a particular social group, and refusal to join a gang does not amount to a political opinion).

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because Fuentes has not established it is more likely than not that he will be tortured by or with the acquiescence of the Honduran government. *See Silaya v. Mukasey,*524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir.2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                    THRIFT MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earns per
share:



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          March 28,        March 29,
                                                            1999              1998
                                                        -----------       -----------
<S>                                                     <C>               <C>        
Numerator:
   Net (loss) income                                    $   (63,141)      $    88,003
                                                        -----------       -----------
Denominator:
   Denominator for basic earnings per
   share-weighted-average shares                          2,185,700         2,145,000


   Effect of dilutive securities:
      Employee stock options                                                   48,000
                                                        -----------       -----------

   Denominator for diluted earnings per share             2,185,700         2,193,000
                                                        ===========       ===========

   (Loss) earnings per share:
      Basic                                             $     (0.03)      $      0.04
                                                        ===========       ===========
      Diluted                                           $     (0.03)      $      0.04
                                                        ===========       ===========

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,230,640
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      15,088,578
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,573,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,936,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      7,397,995
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,383
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,087,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,936,080
<SALES>                                      1,245,584
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,245,584
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  486,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             408,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (137,728)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (137,728)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (137,728)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Franklin County Department of Social Services, on Behalf of Valerie Boulais-Hapeman, Respondent, v Donald Durant, Appellant.

[865 NYS2d 364]

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), entered October 30, 2007, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 4, revoked respondent’s suspended sentence of incarceration.

After respondent failed to make ordered child support payments, petitioner commenced a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 4 seeking to find respondent in willful violation of the court’s order and have him incarcerated for his contempt. A Support Magistrate found that respondent had willfully failed to obey the support order. Thereafter, Family Court confirmed the finding of willful violation and issued a July 2007 order sentencing respondent to a 180-day term of incarceration, which was to be suspended during the period that respondent complied with all of the terms and conditions of the court’s orders, which included keeping support payments current. Respondent did not appeal.

When respondent failed to comply with the July 2007 order, petitioner applied for revocation of respondent’s suspended sentence of incarceration. Following a hearing in October 2007, at which respondent was represented by counsel, Family Court revoked the suspension and committed respondent to a term of incarceration of 180 days. Although respondent completed the *1140sentence of incarceration, he now appeals from the October 2007 order revoking the suspension.

Inasmuch as respondent has only challenged the order revoking the suspension of his sentence and the sentence has already been served, this appeal has been rendered moot *(see Matter of St. Lawrence County Dept. of Social Servs. v Pratt,*24 AD3d 1050, 1050 [2005], *Iv denied*6 NY3d 713 [2006]; *Matter of Sales v Brozzo,*3 AD3d 807, 807-808 [2004], *Iv denied*2 NY3d 706 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven Farnsworth, Appellant.

[987 NYS2d 292]

Motion to dismiss granted. Memorandum: The matters are remitted to Livingston County Court to vacate the convictions and dismiss the indictment and the amended statement of violation dated June 5, 2009 either sua sponte or on application of either the District Attorney or counsel for defendant *(see People v Matteson,*75 NY2d 745 [1989]).

Present — Scudder, PJ., Smith, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.
**Exhibit31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Thomas C.K. Yuen, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of SRS Labs, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

c)     Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

d)    Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)     All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

b)    Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: May 11,  2006 |   |                    |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                 |   | /S / Thomas C.K. Yuen   |
|                 |   | Thomas C.K. Yuen        |
|                 |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Whitestone Construction Company, Inc., Appellant, v Varied Construction Corp., Respondent.

[987 NYS2d 56]

*419Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered on or about October 23, 2013, denying the petition to, inter alia, declare respondent in default, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 75, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The arbitrators had repeatedly denied petitioner’s applications to declare respondent in default for failing to advance its share of arbitrator compensation, the governing arbitration rule barred defaults for nonpayment, and the court properly determined that it should not intervene at this juncture *(see Matter of Salvano v Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith,*85 NY2d 173, 182 [1995]; *Mobil Oil Indonesia v Asamera Oil [Indonesia],*43 NY2d 276, 281 [1977]; *Asesd, LLC v Vanguard Constr. & Dev. Co., Inc.,*79 AD3d 418 [1st Dept 2010]).

The authorities relied upon by petitioner are not persuasive. *Brandifino v CryptoMetrics, Inc.*(27 Misc 3d 513 [Sup Ct, Westchester County 2010]) and *Sanderson Farms, Inc. v Gatlin*(848 So 2d 828 [Miss 2003]) did not involve arbitration rules prohibiting defaults; moreover, *Brandifino*implicated a policy concern not present here. *Sink v Aden Enters., Inc.*(352 F3d 1197 [9th Cir 2003]) also did not involve a prohibition on defaults, and in that case the court upheld the default remedy granted by the arbitrator.

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.P, Renwick, Andrias, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
<CURRENCY>U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             470
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                       313
<INVENTORY>                                      5,688
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,389
<PP&E>                                           7,605
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,779
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,899
<SALES>                                          6,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,978
<CGS>                                            4,571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    209
<INCOME-TAX>                                       104
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                105
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       105
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.70

                    EXTENSION OF LEASE OF A CONDOMINIUM UNIT

                        (Metropolitan Tower Condominium)

                                     between

                         RAUL ALARCON, JR. ("Landlord")

                                       and

                  SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. ("Tenant")

         This will serve to extend that certain Lease of a Condominium unit
dated August 14, 1997 by and between Raul Alarcon, Jr., as Landlord and Spanish
Broadcasting System, Inc., as Tenant.

         The lease term, for purposes of this extension, shall be from September
1, 1997 through and including August 31, 2007. It is specifically agreed to and
understood that Landlord has the unrestricted right upon thirty (30) days notice
to Tenant, if Landlord wishes to use the Premises as his exclusive residence or
if the Landlord wishes to sell the Unit; or (ii) upon ninety (90) days notice,
for any reason whatsoever. Upon the expiration of the thirty (30) day or ninety
(90) day period set forth in the notice, as the case may be, Tenant must quit
possession of the Unit and shall redeliver the Unit to Landlord in the same
condition in which it was tendered to Tenant at the beginning of the term of the
Lease, subject to reasonable wear and tear.

         All other terms and conditions, except paragraph 50 of that certain
Rider to Lease of A Condominium Unit between Raul Alarcon, Jr., as Landlord, and
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc., as Tenant, shall remain in full force and
effect throughout the term of this lease extension.

                                               LANDLORD

                                               /s/ Raul Alarcon, Jr.
                                               RAUL ALARCON, JR.

                                               TENANT

                                               SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.

                                               By:/s/ Joseph A. Garcia

                                               Name: Joseph A. Garcia
                                                 Title: Executive Vice President
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer

DATE: November 11, 1998
Exhibit
32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Seth Lukash, certify that:

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Tumbleweed Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ending September 30, 2014 (the "Report"), the undersigned
officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: December 15, 2014



/s/ Seth Lukash

Seth Lukash

Interim Chief Financial Officer