alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CCA # 13-13-00014-CR STYLE: JUAN GARCIA v. THE STATE OF TEXAS TRIAL COURT: 130th District Court 

## TRIAL COURT#: 12-112 TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Hon. Craig Estlinbaum DISPOSITION: Affirmed 

### DATE: 01/09/15 JUSTICE: Gregory T. Perkes PC S. PUBLISH: DNP: CLK RECORD: RPT RECORD: 5 volumes 

### STATE BR: 1 APPBR:1 

# 140-/5*
OFFENSE: Aggravated Sexual Assault COUNTY: Matagorda

MOTION FOR REHEARING IS: denied 

### DATE:01/09/15 JUDGE: Gregory T. Perkes



### SUPP CLK RECORD. SUPP RPT RECORD. SUPP BR

PROSE BR



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS CCA# 

# \HO-\S APPSLLAA/T^ Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: Q3ll?l*QJJ' JUDGE: 

# Ki^ Lu>U6*U 

# flflcU,AlJr MOTIONFORREHEARINGIN 

# CCAIS: CT*>ni*</ ON /Qpr-jJ 22j 2<^/^ JUDGE: J^C; Disposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PC: PUBLISH:
Y OF MAN ON DNP:
MOTION FOR STA DATE IS:
JUDGE:OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 2Z3

r A, ,p V)f /XJ~ FILE COPY

4/23/2015 

### GARCIA, JUAN 

# feTr.°crisrb.3i2-1?12/ COA No. 13-13-00014-CR PD-0140-15 

# Pursuantto Rule 69.4(a)T.R.AP^tfoe>eejoidjis4etumedtothe courtofappeals. 

# ^2a223^ AbelAcosta, Clerk 13TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK DORIAN RAMIREZ 901 LEOPARD 

### CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERIC ELROD,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 537 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 7, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 130185 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 130185 

 COA: 256194 
 Wayne CC: 03-011884-01 

CHARLES EDGAR GREGORY,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 1, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for 

the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion, and REMAND this case to the Court of 

Appeals to consider whether defendant is entitled to jail credit. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal. 

d0404 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 7, 2006 

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 295 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 295

  To authorize appropriations for the veterans' workforce investment 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2009

 Mr. Buyer (for himself, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Buchanan, and 
 Mr. Stearns) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize appropriations for the veterans' workforce investment 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``More Training for Veterans Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR VETERANS' WORKFORCE 
              INVESTMENT PROGRAMS.

    Section 168 of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 
2913) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for each fiscal year $20,000,000 for programs authorized 
under this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES MILLER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 76 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of June, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00621-CV

In re Paul Vincent Morinville

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The Petition for Writ of Mandamus is denied.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Filed: December 19, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,775
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  200,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,827,363
<PP&E>                                          31,928
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,859,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,927,885
<BONDS>                                        400,977
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           531
<OTHER-SE>                                     529,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,859,291
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,458
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,727
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,594
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,133
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,133
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

** as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Entheos Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on the Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derek Cooper, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)        the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)       The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.

 

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

# TIME AND DATE:

Open meeting of the Executive Committee of the National Science Board, to be held Tuesday, October 10, 2017, from 2:00-3:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE:

This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Committee Chair's Opening Remarks; approval of Executive Committee Minutes of July 17, 2017; approval of Addendum to the Plenary Closed Minutes of the NSB Meeting of May 2017; discuss issues and topics for an agenda of the NSB Meeting scheduled for November 8-9, 2017.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: James Hamos, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314. Telephone: (703) 292-8000. You may find meeting information and updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    An audio listening line will be available for the public. Members of the public must contact the Board Office to request the number by sending an email to                           ( print page 46840)    *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*                     at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference.                

Dated: October 3, 2017.

Ann Bushmiller,

Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2017-21697 Filed 10-4-17; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21648]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4337-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Florida; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Florida (FEMA-4337-DR), dated September 10, 2017, and 
related determinations.

DATE: The amendment was issued on September 18, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Willie G. Nunn, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this emergency.
    This action terminates the appointment of Just[oacute] 
Hern[aacute]ndez as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-21648 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Terrence CROSS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7562.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 10, 2011.

Decided: Feb. 23, 2011.

William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion for reconsideration of its previous order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. The district court’s order denying the reduction was entered on April 13, 2010. On October 15, 2010, Cross filed a second motion for reconsideration of that order, which the district court denied. As the district court lacked the authority to grant reconsideration of its previous order, *United States v. Goodwyn,*596 F.3d 233 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 3530, 177 L.Ed.2d 1110 (2010), we affirm the district court’s order denying reconsideration. We deny Cross’s motion to remand for resentencing. We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2913 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 301 Simonton Street 

in Key West, Florida, as the ‘‘Sidney M. Aronovitz United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2009 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. MACK, Mr. 

ROONEY, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of 

Florida, Mr. MEEK of Florida, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, and Mr. MARIO

DIAZ-BALART of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 301 

Simonton Street in Key West, Florida, as the ‘‘Sidney 

M. Aronovitz United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse located at 301 

5 Simonton Street in Key West, Florida, shall be known and 

6 designated as the ‘‘Sidney M. Aronovitz United States 

7 Courthouse’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2913 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Sidney M. Aronovitz United 

6 States Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### Rafael Lora et al., Respondents, v Lexington Business Company et al., Defendants, and Anthony Marino Construction Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Morse Diesel, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 719]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff Anthony Marino Construction Company appeals from an order of the Supreme *490Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated December 12, 1996, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof which denied those branches of the defendant third-party plaintiffs motion which were to dismiss the causes of action based on alleged violations of Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against it, and substituting therefor provisions granting those branches of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff Rafael Lora, while operating a jackhammer in the subbasement of a building, was injured when the jackhammer moved backward and struck him in the face. His injuries did not result from an elevation-related hazard, nor has he alleged how violations of specific standards of conduct promulgated by the Commissioner of Labor contributed to his injuries *(see, Amato v State of New York,*241 AD2d 400). Accordingly, the causes of action premised upon Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) are dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant third-party plaintiff.

However, there is a question of fact as to whether the defendant third-party plaintiff, as general contractor, is liable to the injured plaintiff pursuant to Labor Law § 200 and common-law principles *(see, Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co.,*81 NY2d 494, 505-507). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANAYELIY GALVAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-74704

Agency No. A095-177-080

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Anayeliy Galvan, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law,

FILED

SEP 23 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-74704

Khan v. Holder, 584 F.3d 773, 776 (9th Cir. 2009), and we deny the petition for

review. 

The BIA properly concluded that Galvan is statutorily ineligible for

cancellation of removal because she was convicted of two crimes involving moral

turpitude. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C) (an alien is ineligible for cancellation of

removal if convicted of an offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)).

Galvan’s remaining contentions are not persuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, John Fallini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/  John
      FalliniJohn
      Fallini, Chief Financial Officer
              November 9, 2009
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angelica Marie MONDRAGON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40467

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 6, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert Garza, Brownsville, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Angelica Mondragon pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to transporting an illegal alien within the United States for private financial gain. She argues that her sentence is unlawful because the district court did not follow the terms of her plea agreement, which she asserts required the court to grant a downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K3.1. Although Mondragon’s challenge to the legality of her sentence may be barred by the appellate-waiver provision in the agreement, the government has failed to invoke the waiver with respect to this claim, so normally we would be able to review its merits. *See United States v. Story,*439 F.3d 226, 231 (5th Cir.2006).

Because Mondragon received a short sentence of only ten months, she has completed her term and thus has been released. Despite that she still must complete her three years’ supervised release, this appeal is moot, as explained in No. 08-10341, *United States v. Boston,*419 Fed.Appx. 505, 505-06, 2011 U.S.App. LEXIS 6036, at *l-*4 (5th Cir. Mar. 23, 2011) (per curiam) (unpublished). Our obligation to examine possible mootness *sua sponte, see id.*at *1, leads us necessarily to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction in light of its mootness.

If we were to examine the merits, we would affirm. Mondragon has failed to show — under any standard — that the refusal to grant a sentence reduction under § 5K3.1 was contrary to the terms of the plea agreement. Mondragon also contends the district court erred in assessing a two-level role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(c) because, she says, the facts did not support that she occupied a leadership role. She further asserts that the court imposed a harsher sentence based on misleading facts in the presen-tence report and violated its obligations under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(3)(B) by not inquiring into the accuracy of this erroneous information. These *383issues are barred by the appeal waiver provision in the plea agreement.

The appeal is DISMISSED as moot.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.