alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21**

**POLYMER GROUP,INC.LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY**

The followingcomprises a list of the subsidiaries of the Company as of December 30, 2006:

Albuma S.A.S.

Bonlam (S.C.), Inc.

Bonlam Andina Ltd.

Bonlam Holdings BV

Bonlam S.A. de C.V.

Chicopee Holdings B.V.

Chicopee Holdings CV

Chicopee, Inc.

DIFCO Performance Fabrics, Inc.

Dominion Nonwovens Sudamerica, S.A.

Dominion Textile (USA) Inc.

Dominion Textile Mauritius Inc.

Dominion Textile, Inc.

DT Acquisition Inc.

FabPro Oriented Polymers, Inc.

Fabrene Corp.

Fabrene, Inc.

FiberGol Corporation

FiberTech Group, Inc.

FNA Acquisition, Inc.

FNA Polymer Corp.

Geca Tapes B.V.

Geca-Tapes PTE LTD

Nanhai Nanxin Non-Wovens Co. Ltd.

Nordlys SAS

PGI Europe, Inc.

PGI Holdings BV

PGI Neunkirchen GmbH

PGI Nonwoven (Foshan) Co. Ltd.

PGI Nonwoven Ltd.

PGI Nonwovens (China) Co. Ltd.

PGI Nonwovens A.B.

PGI Nonwovens BV

PGI Nonwovens Mauritius Ltd.

PGI Polymer, Inc.

PNA Corp.

Poly-Bond Inc.

Polyionix Separation Technologies, Inc.

Pristine Brands Corporation

Technetics Group, Inc.

 

----
#### In the Matter of Carol Alston, Petitioner, v Stephen D. Morgan et al., Respondents.

[664 NYS2d 819]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents, dated March 12, 1996, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of misconduct, and terminated her employment as a toll collector.

*288Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Following a hearing, the respondents adopted the recommendation of a Hearing Officer to dismiss the petitioner from her position as a toll collector due to, *inter alia,*excessive absenteeism. The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 asserting, *inter alia,*that the determination was not made upon substantial evidence and that the punishment imposed was excessive.

It is well settled that an administrative determination is supported by substantial evidence when the evidence consists of “ ‘such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact’ ” *(People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130, 139, quoting *300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 180). In the present proceeding, the record established that the petitioner had a number of unauthorized absences over an approximately 15-month period, had failed to provide medical authorization for some of her absences, and had neglected to' advise her supervisors in advance that she would be absent. Further, there was evidence that the absences, were a result, in part, of oversleeping and car trouble. The failure to report to work and to provide documentation for absences as an employee is directed to do, is a rational basis for finding misconduct *(see, Matter of Romano v Town Bd.,*200 AD2d 934). Therefore, the determination finding the petitioner guilty of misconduct was supported by substantial evidence *(see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly,*71 NY2d 135, 140; *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 231; *Matter of Glinka v Town of Poughkeepsie,*209 AD2d 773). Furthermore, the determination that the petitioner be dismissed was not so disproportionate to the offenses committed as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness *(see, Matter of Holmes v Simpson,*96 AD2d 502, 504-505 [Lazer, J., dissenting], *revd*64 NY2d 678, *on dissenting opn at App Div; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., supra; Matter of Bynoe v Weinstein,*82 AD2d 884).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1
   


                         Consent Of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-98126) pertaining to the 1990 Stock Option Plan for Directors; and
1990 Stock Option Plan for Key Employees; the Chairman's Compensation Program
and Employment Agreement; and the President's Compensation Program and
Employment Agreement of our report dated November 1, 1996, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of The Barbers, Hairstyling for Men & Women,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended September
26, 1996.

                                                               Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 26, 1996
Exhibit 10.2

















November 18, 2014


Mr. John J. Ray III
649 Palm Circle
NAPLES, Florida 34102


Dear John:


On behalf of GT Advanced Technologies Inc. (“GTAT”), I wish to convey our appreciation for your decision to join the Board of Directors of GTAT.  We are very are pleased that you have decided to help us reach our objectives.


According to its bylaws, the business and affairs of GTAT shall be managed by or under the direction of the Board of Directors.  Our bylaws also state that Directors shall be elected annually and shall hold office until the next annual meeting.


The Board of Directors will meet on a regular basis, approximately four times each year, in addition to the Annual Meeting.  Special meetings may be called periodically by the Chairman of the Board or the President and CEO of GTAT, Thomas Gutierrez. 


Your compensation as a director will be $60,000 per year, payable quarterly in advance.  In addition, you will compensated for additional fees in conjunction with your service on th following committees of the Board of Directors:  Restructuring Committee Chairman $15,000;  Restructuring Committee Member $75,000; Special Committee member $75,000.  You shall also be eligible for reimbursement for reasonable and customary food, travel and lodging expenses incurred by you in connection with your service as a member of the Board.


In addition, the Company will provide you the customary indemnification under its charter and under a separate indemnification agreement.
We are truly excited about the prospect of your joining our Board.  Please confirm your acceptance by executing the enclosed copies of this letter, and returning via scan/email one copy to GTAT, attention Hoil Kim (hoil.kim@gtat.com).  As always, please feel free to contact me should you wish to discuss any aspect of your service on GTAT’s Board of Directors.












	
			
	GT Advanced Technologies
243 Daniel Webster Highway
Merrimack, NH 03054
	Phone:   +1 603.883.5200
Fax:       +1 603.595.6993
	

www.gtat.com
























Sincerely,


/s/Matthew E. Massengill


Matthew E. Massengill
Chairman


cc: Hoil Kim


Accepted:


/s/John J. Ray III
                                            
John J. Ray III


Date: November 21, 2014




	
			
	GT Advanced Technologies
243 Daniel Webster Highway
Merrimack, NH 03054
	

Phone:   +1 603.883.5200
Fax:       +1 603.595.6993
	

www.gtat.com
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Latisa Shorts, Appellant.

[860 NYS2d 150]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Crecca, J.), rendered June 30, 2005, convicting her of conspiracy in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (s*ee People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of conspiracy in the fourth degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

*541Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court’s circumstantial evidence charge was proper. The charge “adequately conveyed to the jury the principle that it must appear that the inference of guilt was the only one that could fairly and reasonably be drawn, and the evidence had to exclude beyond a reasonable doubt every hypothesis of innocence” *(People v Brewster,*48 AD3d 590, 590 [2008]; *see People v Ford,*66 NY2d 428, 441 [1985]; *People v Sanchez,*61 NY2d 1022, 1024 [1984]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Rivera, J.P, Spolzino, Dickerson and Eng, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.6


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership III-F ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 29th day of March, 2006.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP III-F
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K. Spohr, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Diversified Futures Trust I for the period January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                          
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David K. Spohr
|Name:              |  | David K. Spohr                                           
|Title:             |  | Senior Vice President and Director of Fund Administration
|                   |  | (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)                 
|                   |  | Preferred Investment Solutions Corp.,                    
|                   |  | Managing Owner of                                        
|                   |  | Diversified Futures Trust I                              

Date: March 27, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46982-46983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2154-007.
    Applicants: Twin Eagle Resource Management, LLC.
    Description: Amendment to June 30, 2017 Triennial Market Power 
Update for the Northeast Region of Twin Eagle Resource Management, LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/3/17.
    Accession Number: 20171003-5073.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/24/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2538-001.
    Applicants: AEP Generation Resources Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Reactive Supply and Voltage Control 
Stuart Amendment to be effective 10/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 10/3/17.
    Accession Number: 20171003-5089.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/24/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-17-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Request for Limited Tariff Waiver Request of PJM 
Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Filed Date: 10/2/17.
    Accession Number: 20171002-5338.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/23/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-18-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Navopache NITSA and NOA to 
be effective 10/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 10/3/17.
    Accession Number: 20171003-5114.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/24/17.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES18-1-000.
    Applicants: Massachusetts Electric Company.
    Description: Application under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act 
for Authorization to Issue Securities of Massachusetts Electric 
Company.
    Filed Date: 10/3/17.
    Accession Number: 20171003-5072.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/24/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.


[[Page 46983]]


    Dated: October 3, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-21727 Filed 10-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2024

- 0559 LT Case No. 2004

- CF

- 000160

- A

_____________________________ A DRIAN K. G RAY , Petitioner ,

v. S TATE O F F LORI DA , Respondent

.

_____________________________ Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Adrian K. Gray , Cross City, pro se
. No Appearance for Respondent.

May 17 , 2024

P ER C URIAM

. This Court previously denied Petitioner ’s first Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on March 28, 2023. Petitioner files this second petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus once again attempting to obtain review of his successive claims , both stemming from this Nassau County Circuit Court Case No. 2004- CF -000160-A. Accordingly, we dismiss this petition. See Richardson v. State , 918 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Because it appears that Petitioner ’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous,2

Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Nassau County Circuit Court Case No. 2 004

- CF

- 0 00160

- A , may result in sanctions such as a bar
o n pro se filing in this Court. State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
D ISMISSED ; P ETITIONER C AUTIONED

. L AMBERT , K ILBA NE , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

with Respect to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A

for the Year Ended December 31, 2011

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Vermillion, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify,
to the best of such officers knowledge, that:



|1. | The Companys Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Form 10-K/A) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                 
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 30, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Gail S. Page                                                                
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Gail S. Page President and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 30, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Eric J. Schoen                                                              
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Eric J. Schoen Chief
Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer)           

The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K/A or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officers.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligroup, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alok Bajpai, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

| (1)    | The Report fully complies   with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | The information contained   in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial   condition and results of operations of the Company.                                       |

| DATE:  March 28,   2007 | By:    | /s/ Alok Bajpai         |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                              |   |                         |
|                              |   | Alok Bajpai             |
|                              |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  January      24, 2011 |   | /s/      Weiqiu Dong                         |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   | Weiqiu      Dong                             |
|                                    |   | Chief      Financial Officer                 |
|                                    |   | (Chief      Accounting and FinancialOfficer) |

----