alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of SRS Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas C.K. Yuen , ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofmy knowledge:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May  14, 2004 |   |                    |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                | By:    | /s/ Thomas C.K. Yuen    |
|                |   | Thomas C.K. Yuen        |
|                |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Order entered July 7, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 00982

- CV

JOHNNY AGUINAGA, ET AL. , Appellant s

V.

JAT PROJECTS HOLDINGS TEXAS, LLC, ET AL. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 20

- 10069

O RDER

Before the Court is appellees’ July 2, 2021 motion to dismiss the appeal for
mootness and unopposed request to stay briefing. The motion to di smiss is based on the issues asserted in appellants’ amended brief filed on May 7, 2021. We

GRANT the motion to the extent that we STAY the deadline for appellees’ brief
pending disposition of the motion to dismiss . Appellants shall file, by July 19,

202 1 , a response to the motion to dismiss.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Kirk C. Saylor, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                                                                            
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: /s/ Kirk C. Saylor

Kirk C. Saylor, Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7859
ERIC LEE JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusRONALD E. MOATS; RICHARD LANHAM, SR., Commissioner of Correction; GARY KENT, Correctional Officer; JEFFRY WILSON, Correctional Officer; KAREN ELLIOTT, Case Management Supervisor; RICHARD GROVE, Case Manager; HERBERT COOPER, Lieutenant, Hou sing Unit #1 Manager; GENE RIPPEON, Commissary Supervisor; JACK HARNE,Captain, RCI Administrative Remedy Coordinator; GARY R. SMITH, Sergeant involved on 3/26/94; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER INVOLVED ON 2/12/95; JEFFERY ENGLEHART, Correctional Officer, Individually and in their Official Capacities, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA95-545-CCB) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Eric Lee Johnson, A ppellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant app eals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Moats , No. CA-95-545-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 1, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47630-47631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R01-OAR-2016-0626; A-1-FRL-9969-56-Region 1]


Air Plan Approval; Vermont; Regional Haze Five-Year Progress 
Report; Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of an adverse comment, the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) is withdrawing the August 16, 2017, direct 
final rule approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 
submitted by the State of Vermont. Vermont's SIP revision addresses 
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules that require 
states to submit periodic reports

[[Page 47631]]

describing the progress toward reasonable progress goals (RPGs) 
established for regional haze and a determination of adequacy of the 
State's existing regional haze SIP. This action is being taken in 
accordance with the Clean Air Act.

DATES: The direct final rule published on August 16, 2017 (82 FR 
38834), is withdrawn effective October 13, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne K. McWilliams, Air Quality 
Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, New England 
Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05-2), 
Boston, MA 02109--3912, telephone (617) 918-1697, facsimile (617) 918-
0697, email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fe939d89979292979f938dd09f90909bbe9b8e9fd0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ce1effbe5e0e0e5ede1ffa2ede2e2e9cce9fceda2ebe3fa">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the direct final rule, EPA stated that if 
adverse comments were submitted by September 15, 2017, the rule would 
be withdrawn and not take effect. EPA received an adverse comment prior 
to the close of the comment period and, therefore, is withdrawing the 
direct final rule. EPA will address the comment in a subsequent final 
action based upon the proposed rule also published on August 16, 2017 
(82 FR 38864). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this 
action.

    Dated: September 27, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
 Accordingly, the amendments to 40 CFR 52.2370 published in the Federal 
Register on August 16, 2017 (82 FR 38834), on page 38838 are withdrawn 
effective October 13, 2017.

[FR Doc. 2017-22123 Filed 10-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DENNIS A. BARNES,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-1377

Opinion filed August 3, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Dennis A. Barnes, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

ROWE, MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of NextMart, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company./s/ Carla Zhou/s/ Wang YihanCarla Zhou
Chief Financial OfficerWang Yihan
Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 22, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-50440

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FABIAN ALEX BRAVO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:16-CV-197

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court granted Fabian Alex Bravo a certificate of appealability,

following the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, on the issue whether the 

district court erred by determining that Bravo was subject to the enhanced 

penalties of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1), 

based on his prior Texas convictions for aggravated robbery, aggravated 

assault, and burglary. The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 31, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-50440 Document: 00515057105 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/31/2019
No. 18-50440

2

Bravo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bravo has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-50440 Document: 00515057105 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/31/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN THE SEPTEMBER 30, 1998  QUARTERLY  REPORT FILED ON FORM
10-QSB  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                     1,386,102
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                723,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           2,109,191
<PP&E>                                        33,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                11,059
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,861,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        312,065
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       9,567
<OTHER-SE>                                 2,539,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,861,039
<SALES>                                      707,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             707,750
<CGS>                                        462,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,443,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (658,309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               (658,309)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.07)
        



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 18, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50659

Summary Calendar

BOBBY GENE ANNIS; GREGORIO CASTANEDA; MICHAEL BRIGGS; G. H.

LINCECUM,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; JAMES B.

FOX, Warden, Bastrop Federal Correctional Institution;

DEBORA WARREN, in her individual capacity and as an employee

of the Bastrop Federal Correctional Institution,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CV-539

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s dismissal of

their lawsuit alleging that the defendants violated the plaintiffs’

Eighth Amendment rights while the plaintiffs were incarcerated at

the Bastrop Federal Correctional Institution. This court reviews

a dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure de novo. Edwards v. Johnson, 209 F.3d 772, 776 (5th Cir.

2000).
No. 05-50659

-2-

In their first issue, the plaintiffs challenge the district

court’s dismissal based upon the general Rule 12(b)(6) standard but

fail to adequately brief their argument. Accordingly, that issue

is waived. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.

1993); FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9).

The plaintiffs also contend that the district court’s

dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies was

erroneous because there was no evidence in the record that any

administrative remedies existed, other than the remedies that the

plaintiffs pursued. As noted in district court, the Bureau of

Prisons has established an administrative remedy program.

28 C.F.R. §§ 542.13-542.15; see also Lundy v. Osborn, 555 F.2d 534,

534-35 (5th Cir. 1977). For the purpose of meeting the exhaustion

requirement set forth at 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), it is the plaintiffs

who must allege exhaustion with sufficient specificity. See

Underwood v. Wilson, 151 F.3d 292, 294, 296 (5th Cir. 1998); see

also Days v. Johnson, 322 F.3d 863, 866 (5th Cir. 2003) (“Since the

amendment of § 1997e, this Court has taken a strict approach to the

exhaustion requirement.”). Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ argument

lacks merit.

As the plaintiffs have failed to challenge the district

court’s dismissal on any other basis, the district court’s judgment

is AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Susquehanna Media Co. (the
Company) for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. Kennedy, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ David E. Kennedy
David E. Kennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         752,120
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,727,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                   419,732
<INVENTORY>                                  2,407,629
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,931,328
<PP&E>                                       4,108,571
<DEPRECIATION>                                 649,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,830,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,869,588
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,446
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,602,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,830,151
<SALES>                                      7,757,199
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,757,199
<CGS>                                        1,726,911
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,726,911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             154,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,137,663
<INCOME-TAX>                                   496,843
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            640,820
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   640,820
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SRS Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Thomas C.K. Yuen, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 15, 2003 | By:    | /s/  THOMAS C.K. YUEN                                 |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|               |   | Thomas  C.K. Yuen                                     |
|               |   | Chairman  of the Board and 

Chief  Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SRS Labs, Inc.and will be retained by SRS Labs, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3013 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide for the more accurate 

and complete enumeration of certain overseas Americans in the decennial 

census. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2009 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah (for himself and Mr. CHAFFETZ) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide for the 

more accurate and complete enumeration of certain overseas Americans in the decennial census. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METHODS TO IMPROVE THE ENUMERATION OF 

4 CERTAIN OVERSEAS AMERICANS. 

5 Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub8 section (h); and 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3013 IH

1 (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(g)(1) Effective beginning with the 2010 decennial 

4 census of population, in taking any tabulation of total pop5 ulation by States under subsection (a) for purposes of the 

6 apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the 

7 several States, the Secretary shall take appropriate meas8 ures to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that 

9 all Americans residing abroad on the decennial census 

10 date are fully and accurately counted, and are properly 

11 attributed to their respective States. 

12 ‘‘(2) The measures under this subsection shall include 

13 at least the following: 

14 ‘‘(A) One or more methods by which, at the re15 quest of a non-governmental organization, adminis16 trative records of such organization may, if such 

17 records satisfy such criteria as the Secretary may es18 tablish, be used to enumerate members of such orga19 nization who are residing overseas as of the decen20 nial census date. 

21 ‘‘(B) One or more methods under which an 

22 international ‘Be Counted’ form may be completed 

23 at an embassy of the United States by Americans 

24 residing overseas as of the decennial census date. 

25 ‘‘(3) Nothing in this subsection shall be considered— 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3013 IH

1 ‘‘(A) to affect the methods used in the enu2 meration of any civilian or military personnel of the 

3 United States; or 

4 ‘‘(B) to permit or require that the data ob5 tained under this subsection be used for any purpose 

6 other than the apportionment of Representatives in 

7 Congress among the several States.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS