alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, STATEMENTS
OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND 
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          32,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  258,158
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,109
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          19,193
<DEPRECIATION>                                      48
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 336,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   336,732
<SALES>                                         10,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,001
<CGS>                                            8,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,817
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,762)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (40)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,802)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,802)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification PursuantTo 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Polymer Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William B.Hewitt, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: March 14, 2007 | /s/ William  B. Hewitt                             |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                      | William B. Hewitt*Interim Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
Exhibit 10.1 - First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement






Exhibit 10.1


HOSSEIN FATEH
FIRST AMENDMENT
TO
THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is dated as of December 2, 2014 (the “Effective Date”), by and between DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), DF Property Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “LLC”), and Hossein Fateh (the “Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have previously entered into a Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 5, 2013 (the “Original Agreement”) pursuant to which the Executive serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company;
WHEREAS, the term of the Original Agreement expired on December 1, 2014;
WHEREAS, the Company, the LLC and the Executive now desire to amend the terms of the Original Agreement to extend the term of the Original Agreement for one (1) year.
Accordingly, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.    Section 1 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:
Term.  The Company and the LLC shall continue to employ the Executive, and the Executive hereby accepts such continued employment for a term under this Agreement that shall commence on the Effective Date and end on December 1, 2015, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 or Section 5 (the period during which the Executive is employed hereunder being hereinafter referred to as the “Term”).
2.    Unless specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in effect.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed their names as of the day and year first above written.
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC.


By:      /s/ Richard A. Montfort, Jr.            
Name:    Richard A. Montfort, Jr.
		
	Title:
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary




DF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC


		
	By:
	DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P.,


its Managing Member


		
	By:
	DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc.,


its General Partner


By:     /s/ Richard A. Montfort, Jr.        
Name:    Richard A. Montfort, Jr.
		
	Title:
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary






/s/ Hossein Fateh            
Name: Hossein Fateh
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Brooke Group Ltd. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-38869 and File No. 33-63119) and
Form S-8 (File No. 333-24217) of: (i) our report, dated April 8, 1998, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statements
schedule of Brooke Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 and (ii) our
report, dated March 31, 1998 on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of New Valley Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997
and 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995, which
reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Miami, Florida
April 8, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      21,371,646
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      34,000,903
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                           410,472,969
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                123,205,237
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      38,699,460
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        38,322,733
<LOANS>                                    813,080,315
<ALLOWANCE>                                  6,408,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,560,817
<DEPOSITS>                                 763,393,297
<SHORT-TERM>                               629,381,631
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         20,252,103
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    38,489,266
<OTHER-SE>                                 106,100,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,560,817
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             18,656,942
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            9,119,309
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            27,776,251
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,345,253
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          17,790,410
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        9,985,841
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,500,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             743,790
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             10,177,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,736,338
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  10,736,338
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,479,835
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.99
<LOANS-NON>                                 31,998,902
<LOANS-PAST>                                   196,806
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             35,880,491
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             6,771,698
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                1,980,602
<RECOVERIES>                                    44,920
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            6,408,016
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         6,408,016
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Thomas J. McGinn, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

*803[665 NYS2d 734]

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1985. He has maintained an office for the practice of law in the Albany area.

By petition dated November 10, 1997, the Committee on Professional Standards accused respondent of converting more than $180,000 of a client residing in a nursing home for whom he held a power of attorney. By motion dated the same day, petitioner seeks an order suspending respondent pursuant to section 806.4 (f) (22 NYCRR 806.4 [fj) of this Court’s rules pending consideration of the disciplinary charges against him upon the ground that respondent is guilty of professional misconduct immediately threatening the public interest, the evidence of which is uncontroverted. Respondent has submitted an affirmation stating he does not oppose the motion.

Petitioner’s uncontroverted and unexplained evidence demonstrates that, between May 1990 and the summer of 1997, respondent issued at least 105 checks to himself from the client’s checking account totaling $141,150.84 and one check to Daytona Development for $40,000, all without his client’s knowledge or authorization. Petitioner also advises that it is preparing an application for a subpoena to obtain requested bank records not yet produced by respondent.

Under the circumstances presented, we grant petitioner’s motion and direct respondent’s suspension until such time as the disciplinary matter commenced by petitioner has been concluded and until further order of this Court *(see, e.g., Matter of Van De Loo,*225 AD2d 885).

Mercure, J. P., White, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is suspended from the practice of law, effective upon service of this order upon respondent, which suspension shall continue until such time as the disciplinary matter pending against respondent has been concluded and until further order of this Court; and it is further ordered that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and he is forbidden to appear as an attorney and counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rule (22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00384-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Desiree Renee GOMEZ,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 542323

Honorable John Longoria, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA, JUSTICE WATKINS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order granting 

appellee’s motion to suppress is REVERSED. This case is REMANDED for further proceedings.

SIGNED March 13, 2019.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47290-47291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Notice of Rescission of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the I-94 
East-West Corridor Project in the City of Milwaukee, Milwaukee County, 
Wisconsin

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of 
Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of rescission of the Record of Decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that the 
ROD for the proposed I-94 East-West Corridor (70th Street to 16th 
Street) Project in the City of Milwaukee, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin 
is rescinded effective with this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bethaney Bacher-Gresock, Major Project 
Environmental Manager, Federal Highway Administration, 525 Junction 
Road, Suite 8000, Madison, Wisconsin, 53717-2157, Telephone: (608) 662-
2119.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, as the lead Federal agency, in 
cooperation with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) 
signed a ROD on September 9, 2016 for the I-94 East-West Corridor (70th 
Street to 16th Street) Project; it is hereby rescinded. The purpose of 
the project was to address the deteriorated infrastructure condition of 
I-94, including obsolete roadway and bridge design, and thereby 
maintain a state of good repair and improve safety along approximately 
3.5 miles of I-94. The proposed project included modernizing

[[Page 47291]]

existing interchanges and adding capacity along the corridor.
    WisDOT has notified FHWA that pursuant to s. 84.0145, Wis. Stats., 
the Legislature must specifically authorize WisDOT to proceed with the 
project. The recently approved 2017 Wisconsin Act 59, the State's 
biennial budget, did not authorize WisDOT to advance the project. 
Therefore, FHWA has determined, in conjunction with WisDOT, that the 
ROD shall be rescinded. Any future environmental action within this 
corridor will comply with environmental review requirements of the 
National Environmental Policy Act ((NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.)), 
FHWA environmental regulations (23 CFR 771), and related authorities 
prior to reissuance of a ROD or other NEPA documentation, as 
appropriate. Comments and questions concerning this action should be 
directed to FHWA at the address provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

    Issued on: October 4, 2017.
Timothy C. Marshall,
Assistant Division Administrator, FHWA Wisconsin Division, Madison, 
Wisconsin.
[FR Doc. 2017-21917 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2934 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2934

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent unjust and irrational 
                         criminal punishments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2009

  Mr. Scott of Virginia (for himself and Mr. Conyers) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent unjust and irrational 
                         criminal punishments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Common Sense in Sentencing Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE A SENTENCE BELOW A STATUTORY MINIMUM.

    Section 3553 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g) Authority To Impose a Sentence Below a Statutory Minimum To 
Prevent an Unjust Sentence.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the court may impose a sentence below a statutory minimum if the 
court finds that it is necessary to do so in order to avoid violating 
the requirements of subsection (a).''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          48,208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,038
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,151
<INVENTORY>                                     27,494
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,330
<PP&E>                                          31,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,495
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           198
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,577
<SALES>                                        178,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               178,193
<CGS>                                          121,727
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,727
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                89,343<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,551
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  58
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,886)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,942)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,942)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES $8,417 ACQUIRED IN-PROCESS R&D AND $10,091 OF MERGER COSTS AND
SPECIAL CHARGES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Parker, Appellant.

[667 NYS2d 267]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), rendered March 29, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, without a hearing (Starkey, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court properly denied, without a hearing, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. The defendant had failed to make sufficient factual allegations of standing to contest the search *(see, People v Mendoza,*82 NY2d 415) and thereby lost his right to object to the search of the bag which was found to contain 30 vials of crack cocaine *(see,*CPL 710.40 [4]; *cf., People v Martinez,*80 NY2d 444, 449).

We find that the charge, as a whole, did not undermine the defense or place the defendant “in the midst of contradictory defenses” *(People v DeGina,*72 NY2d 768, 777).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Copertino and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.8

 

	
David M. Cordani

President and CEO 

 
    	
 
    	
 


    
	
January 30, 2017
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Christopher J.   Hocevar
    	
 
    	
Routing W2SLT

900 Cottage Grove Road

Bloomfield, CT  06152

Telephone  860.226.7482

Facsimile  860.226.3099
    


 

Dear Chris:

 

I am pleased to confirm your new compensation package as you assume the position of President, Strategy, Segments and Solutions to be effective upon assumption of your new responsibilities.

 

§                  Base Salary – will increase to a pre-tax annualized rate of $550,000.  This amount will be reviewed annually based on your performance and pay position relative to the competitive market.

 

§                  Annual Incentive – your annual target will increase to $500,000 for the 2017 performance year.  As you are aware, annual incentive is typically paid in the first quarter of the year following the performance period and is not considered earned until the date paid.

 

§                  Long-Term Incentive – your annual long-term opportunity  will become $1,250,000 and will continue to consist of the following two components:

 

–                 Stock Options – grants are typically awarded in the first quarter each year and may vary from 0 to 200% of target based on individual performance and potential.  Options typically vest over a 3 year period and expire no later than 10 years after grant.  The 2017 annual target is $625,000.

 

–                 Strategic Performance Shares (SPS) – grants are typically awarded in the first quarter of each year and may vary from 0 to 200% of target based on individual performance and potential.  SPS awards are typically paid or vested three years after the beginning of the performance period.  Awards are not considered earned until the date paid or vested.  The 2017 annual target is $625,000.

 

§                  Stock Ownership Guidelines – To align management and shareholder interests Cigna executives are subject to stock ownership guidelines. The stock ownership guideline for your position as an Executive Officer will become 3 times your new base salary.

 

	
NEW TOTAL ANNUAL COMPENSATION OPPORTUNITY:
    	
 
    	
$2,300,000
    


 

The changes above have no impact on previously awarded bonuses, stock options or SPS grants.  The compensation program elements – annual incentive, stock options and strategic performance shares are those of our current program and may be subject to modification or enhancement by the Board of Directors.  As an executive of the company, your compensation will be subject to any future program changes.

 

Chris, I look forward to continuing to partner with you.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

 

	
David M. Cordani
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
cc:
    	
K. Gorodetzer
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
J. Murabito