alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), I, Alan J. Gotcher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
        Alan J. Gotcher
 Alan
        J.
        Gotcher
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 November
        14, 2005
DIGITAL DESCRIPTOR SYSTEMS, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KS for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Anthony Shupin, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Digital
Descriptor Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

                                        Date: September 12, 2006


                                        /s/ Anthony Shupin
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Anthony Shupin
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                      EQUITY GENERAL PARTNER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert McKinney, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of National Property Analysts
Master Limited Partnership;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2006

By: Feldman International Inc.,
    its equity general partner


By: /s/ Robert McKinney
    ---------------------------------
Name: Robert McKinney
Title: President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
R. Bovee, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Bovee
----------------------
David R. Bovee
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
August 13, 2003
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1360-18

JOSHUA JACOBS, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON THE STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

BOWIE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and, pursuant to Texas

Penal Code § 12.42(c)(2)(A)(i) and (B)(v), sentenced to life in prison. He appealed, arguing

that the Louisiana conviction used to enhance his punishment was not “substantially similar”

to the elements of a Texas offense, as required by the statute.
JACOBS - 2

The Court of Appeals applied the two-pronged test from Prudholm v. State, 333

S.W.3d 590 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011), and Anderson v. State, 394 S.W.3d 531 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2013), to conclude that the two statutes were not “substantially similar.” Jacobs v.

State, 565 S.W.3d 87 (Tex. App. – Texarkana 2018, pet. granted). It therefore reversed the

trial court’s judgment on punishment and remanded for a new punishment hearing. Id.

The State has filed a petition for discretionary review of this decision. We recently

abandoned the second prong of the Prudholm/Anderson test in Fisk v. State, No. PD-1360-

17, 2019 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 541 (Tex. Crim. App. June 5, 2019).

The Court of Appeals in the instant case did not have the benefit of our opinion in

Fisk. Accordingly, we grant the State’s petition for discretionary review, vacate the

judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of Appeals in light of

our opinion in Fisk.

DATE DELIVERED: July 24, 2019

PUBLISH
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3247 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3247

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1100 Town and Country Commons in Chesterfield, Missouri, as the 
      ``Lance Corporal Matthew P. Pathenos Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL MATTHEW P. PATHENOS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1100 Town and Country Commons in Chesterfield, Missouri, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Matthew P. 
Pathenos Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Matthew P. Pathenos Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3247

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1100 Town and Country Commons in Chesterfield, Missouri, as the 
      ``Lance Corporal Matthew P. Pathenos Post Office Building''.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramon Rosario, Appellant.

[665 NYS2d 662]

—Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J.), rendered January 15, 1997, convicting defendant, after his plea of guilty, of two counts of robbery in the second degree under two separate indictments, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 71/2 to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

The *Dunaway (Dunaway v New York,*442 US 200) branch of defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied without a hearing since his conclusory statements were insufficient to *152raise an issue of fact as to the lawfulness of his arrest (CPL 710.60 [3] [b]). Notably, defendant did not controvert the specific factual averments as to the circumstances of the four separate criminal incidents and the arrest that were included in the Criminal Court complaint, the voluntary disclosure form, and the indictment *(People v Toxey,*220 AD2d 204, *lv denied*88 NY2d 855). Defendant’s plea of not guilty did not constitute a denial of criminal activity sufficient to raise a factual issue warranting a *Dunaway*hearing *(cf., People v Hightower,*85 NY2d 988, 990). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 

**- 1040** 

FREDERICK ONWUMBIKO
,

Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC; PINTA GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC
,

Defendants

– Appellees,

and

LONG BEACH MORTGAGE COMPANY
,

Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Alexander Williams, Jr. , District Judge. ( 8:12

- cv

- 01733

- AW )

Submitted : June 19, 2013 Decided: July 11, 2013

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Frederick Onwumbiko, Appellant Pro Se. John Sears Simcox, SIMCOX & BARCLAY, Annapolis, Maryland; John Young Lee, Brian L.2 Moffett, G ORDON FEINBLATT LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Frederick Onwumbiko appeals the district court ’ s order

dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim

. See Fed.

R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We agree with the district court that

Onwumbiko’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations. *

Accordingly, we affirm. Onwumbiko v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank,

N.A. , No. 8:12

- cv

- 01733

- AW (D. Md. Nov. 30, 2012) . We dispense

w ith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before th is court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We note that Onwumbiko disputes on appeal the district court’s conclusion that the only fair lending law that J.P. Morgan Chase Bank is alleged to have violated is the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. We conclude, however, that Onwumbiko’s action i s untimely even considering the alternative consumer protection statutes to which he directly and indirectly alludes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,695,863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,961,084
<ALLOWANCES>                                   561,600
<INVENTORY>                                  1,296,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,739,475
<PP&E>                                       5,004,148
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,481,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,466,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,895,672
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,592
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,522,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,466,321
<SALES>                                     63,530,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            85,323,500
<CGS>                                       52,213,508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               86,910,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,111,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             692,737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,698,582)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,698,582)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (980,311)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,678,893)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.96)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10409

Conference Calendar

 

YUK RUNG TSANG,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, ET AL.,

Respondents,

THE COMMUNITY CORRECTION MANAGER FOR

THE BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:98-CV-114

--------------------

December 15, 1999

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Federal prisoner Yuk Rung Tsang appeals the district court’s

dismissal for failure to state a claim of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition alleging that his constitutional rights were violated

when the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) denied him a one-year sentence

reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e), after he completed a

500-hour drug-treatment program. Tsang does not brief any 
No. 99-10409

-2-

argument in connection with the ex-post-facto claim he raised in

the district court, and that claim is waived. See Yohey v.

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. App. P.

28(a). 

Tsang renews his argument that the denial of the one-year

credit violated his due process rights. His due-process claim

fails because there is no protected liberty interest in early

release under § 3621. See Rublee v. Fleming, 160 F.3d 213, 216

(5th Cir. 1998); Venegas v. Henman, 126 F.3d 760, 765 (5th Cir.

1997)(“[t]he loss of the mere opportunity to be considered for

discretionary early release is too speculative to constitute a

deprivation of a constitutionally protected liberty interest”),

cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1679 (1998). Accordingly, the district

court did not err in dismissing his petition, and its judgment is

AFFIRMED. Tsang’s motions for an expedited appeal and for

discovery are DENIED.

AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 2 , 2013. 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 01111

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T .L.R AND A.R.R
On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09

- 12373

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, O'Neill, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lewis By letter dated August 13, 2012 we notified appellant the $175 filing fee in this case was
due. We directed appellant to pay the fee within ten days and cautioned appellant that failure to
do so would result in the dismissal of the appeal. The same day, we notified appellant the
docketing statement had not been filed. On August 23, 2012, app ellant filed his docketing
statement indicating that he was not indigent. On February 11, 2013 we ordered the Dallas
County District Clerk to either file the clerk’s record or written verification that appellant had not
paid or made arrangements to pay fo r the record. In the same order, we notified appellant that if
we received verification he was not indigent and had not paid for the record, we would dismiss
the appeal without further notice. On March 1, 2013, the Dallas County District Clerk’s office

i nformed the Court that the clerk’s record had been prepared but not filed because appellant had
not paid for the record. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the Court with
proof of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record , contradicted his docketing– 2

– statement indicating he is not indigent, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the
status of this appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b);
42.3(b),(c).

121111F.P05 /David Lewis/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF T.L.R AND A.R.R, CHILDREN

05

- 12

- 01111

- CV On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09

- 12373. Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis. Justices Moseley and O'Neill participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee Kara Rafferty recover her costs of this appeal from appellant Richard Rafferty.

Judgment entered this 2 nd day of April, 2013.

/David Lewis/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Renhuang Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on First Amended Form 10-K/A for the year ended April 30, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Li Shaoming, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                February 27, 2007
            /s/
                Li ShaomingBy:
                Li ShaomingIts:
                Chief Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Renhuang Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Renhuang Pharmaceuticals,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21853]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 Railroad Retirement Board


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a meeting on October 25, 2017, 10:00 a.m. at the Board's meeting room 
on the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:
    Portion open to the public:
    (1) Executive Committee Reports
    The person to contact for more information is Martha P. Rico, 
Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: October 5, 2017.
Martha P. Rico,
For the Board, Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-21853 Filed 10-5-17; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
Exhibit 10.5


 


Liability Acknowledgment Agreement


 


THIS LIABILITY ACKNOWLEDGMENT AGREEMENT
(this “Agreement”), is entered into on October 31, 2014, by and between Sean S. Lee (“Creditor”) and Valuesetters,
Inc. (the “Company”).


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree
as follows:


 


1.                 
Creditor is owed an aggregate of $15,000.00 for services rendered to the Company (the “Payables”).



 


2.                 
Creditor and Company wish to acknowledge the Payables, which are recorded on the Companies
books, and the terms of the Payables. 


 


3.                 
Company hereby acknowledges it owes Creditor $15,000.00.


 


4.                 
Creditor hereby acknowledges that the Payables are not in default, are not interest bearing
and that the Company may pay cash for them or settle them in another matter when the Company has the appropriate resources to do
so. 


 


5.                 
This Agreement may not be modified or changed except by an instrument or instruments in
writing executed by the parties hereto.


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
have caused this Agreement to be duly executed.


 


 


	
        Sean S. Lee, an individual

         

         

        By: /s/ Sean S. Lee

         

        Name: Sean S. Lee

         

         
	
        Valuesetters, Inc.

         

         

        By: /s/ Manuel Teixeira

         

        Name: __Manuel Teixeira

         

        Title: CEO