alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                        Alabama National BanCorporation
                       Computation of Earnings Per Share
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                                  Per Share
                                                          Income       Shares       Amount
                                                        ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                                     <C>          <C>          <C>          
Year ended December 31, 1998
Basic EPS net income ..............................     $   17,372       10,804   $     1.61
                                                                                  ==========
Effect of dilutuve securities options .............                         369
                                                        ----------   ----------   
Diluted EPS .......................................     $   17,372       11,173   $     1.55
                                                        ==========   ==========   ==========

Year ended December 31, 1997
Basic EPS net income ..............................     $   14,116       10,552   $     1.34
                                                                                  ==========
Effect of dilutuve securities options .............                         447
                                                        ----------   ----------      
Diluted EPS .......................................     $   14,116       10,999   $     1.28
                                                        ==========   ==========   ==========

Year ended December 31, 1996
Basic EPS net income ..............................     $   13,627        9,960   $     1.37
                                                                                  ==========
Effect of dilutuve securities options .............                         505
Convertible debentures, net of taxes ..............              5           25
                                                        ----------   ----------
Diluted EPS .......................................     $   13,632       10,490   $     1.30
                                                        ==========   ==========   ==========
 </TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      23.2**











**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





To
      the
      Board of Directors and Shareholders


of
      The
      Savannah Bancorp, Inc.





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Form
      S-3/A (No.333-128724) of The Savannah Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated February
      28, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appear in
      the
      Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report
      on
      Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and our report dated February
      28,
      2006 on the Internal Controls over Financial Reporting which appears in Item
      9A
      of Form 10-K.





/s/
      BDO
      Seidman, LLP





Atlanta,
      Georgia


March
      13,
      2006
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-1431

_____________________________

CHASE DUSTIN RHODEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

September 23, 2022

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, JAY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Susan Ward, Assistant Public Defender, Starke; John Lyon 

Broling, Assistant Regional Counsel, Gainesville; Candice Kaye 

Brower, Regional Counsel, and Melissa Joy Ford, Assistant 

Regional Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Steven Edward Woods,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3319 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3319

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To allow the Pascua Yaqui Tribe to determine the requirements for 
                       membership in that tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERSHIP DETERMINED BY TRIBE.

    Section 3 of Public Law 95-375 (25 U.S.C. 1300f-2) is amended to 
read as follows:
    ``Sec. 3.  For the purposes of section 1 of this Act, membership of 
the Pascua Yaqui Tribe shall consist of any United States citizen of 
Pascua Yaqui blood enrolled by the tribe.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3319

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To allow the Pascua Yaqui Tribe to determine the requirements for 
                       membership in that tribe.
```
EXHIBIT 7.1

COMPUTATION OF NET DEBT TO SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY RATIO

Computation of net debt to equity
ratio

The computation of net debt to equity ratio as at March 31, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:



|                                            |  |                  |           |  |      |  |           | 
|------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | --------- |  | ---- |  | --------- | 
|                                            |  | As at March 31,  |          
|                                            |  | 2015             |           |  | 2014 | 
|                                            |  | (Rs. in million) |          
|Long-term debt                              |  |                  | 544,862.5 |  |      |  | 454,138.6 | 
|Short-term debt (including current portion) |  |                  | 180,465.4 |  |      |  | 165,960.6 | 
|Total debt (A)                              |  |                  | 725,327.9 |  |      |  | 620,099.2 | 
|Cash and cash equivalents                   |  |                  | 197,430.9 |  |      |  | 159,921.5 | 
|Mutual fund (current portion)               |  |                  | 140,685.7 |  |      |  | 95,016.2  | 
|Total investible surplus (B)                |  |                  | 338,116.6 |  |      |  | 254,937.7 | 
|Net Debt (A-B)                              |  |                  | 387,211.3 |  |      |  | 365,161.5 | 
|Equity (including minority interest)        |  |                  | 539,351.8 |  |      |  | 631,696.3 | 
|Net debt/equity                             |  |                  | 0.72      |  |      |  | 0.58      |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7365

MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SIDNEY FEASTER; DOUG WHITE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:16-cv-00051-JPB-MJA)

Submitted: May 25, 2023 Decided: August 30, 2023

Before KING, WYNN, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Jermaine Greene, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7365 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/30/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Jermaine Greene appeals the district court’s order granting summary 

judgment to Defendants on Greene’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. On appeal, we confine 

our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because 

Greene’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he 

has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 

177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit 

rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, although we 

grant Greene leave to proceed in forma pauperis,* we affirm the district court’s judgment. 

We deny Greene’s motions for appointment of counsel and to remand this case to the 

district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* While incarcerated, Greene sought leave under the Prison Litigation Reform Act 

(PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915, to proceed on appeal without prepayment of fees. Greene now 

represents that he has been paroled, meaning that he is no longer subject to the PLRA. See

DeBlasio v. Gilmore, 315 F.3d 396, 398-99 (4th Cir. 2003). For this reason, we construe 

his PLRA motion as an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7365 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/30/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
I, John Stanton, certify that:

1 I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of American Enterprise
Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
if any, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and 

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions); 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions,
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: March 3, 2003

/s/ John Stanton
Chief Financial Officer
------------------------------
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-1220MN

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Jose Antonio Caban, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: October 23, 1998

Filed: October 28, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, ROSS, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Jose Antonio Caban appeals his convictions for conspiracy to distribute and to

possess with intent to distribute cocaine and methamphetamine, and the use of a

telephone in furtherance of drug trafficking. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 & 841(b)(1)(B)

(1994); 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) (1994). Caban contends the district court abused its

discretion when it admitted a police videotape showing him negotiating a cocaine

transaction with undercover officers in 1993. We disagree. Caban’s defense

challenged the mental element of the crimes charged in the indictment, so the

Government had to prove Caban’s state of mind. See United States v. Thomas, 58

F.3d 1318, 1322 (8th Cir. 1995). Thus, the district court properly admitted the
-2-

videotape to show Caban’s knowledge and intent and the tape’s probative value

substantially outweighed the danger of unfair prejudice. See Fed. R. Evid. 404(b);

United States v. Edwards, 91 F.3d 1101, 1103-04 (8th Cir. 1996). Caban also

contends the prosecutor improperly insinuated Caban was a dangerous person when the

prosecutor in his opening statement told the jury its decision making was limited

because charges against other persons had been disposed of, and the jury did not “have

to worry about those [other] people anymore.” Caban further argues that even though

his counsel stated he had no objection to the document, the district court erroneously

admitted Caban’s earlier misdemeanor conviction into evidence. Finally, despite other

evidence that Caban was a large-scale drug operator, Caban contends the

Government’s final witness improperly referred to Caban as a drug dealer. In all three

circumstances, Caban failed to object, so we review for plain error and find none. See

United States v. Guerra, 113 F.3d 809, 816-17 (8th Cir. 1997).

We affirm Caban’s convictions.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10132]

Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, I hereby determine that the person known as Brandon-Lee Thulsie, also known as Sallahuddin Thulsie, also known as Salahuddin ibn Hernani, committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.

Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: August 28, 2017.

Rex W. Tillerson,

 Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2017-20031 Filed 9-19-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         149,109
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,075
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (16,089)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,883
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,140
<PP&E>                                       1,999,133
<DEPRECIATION>                               (263,965)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,837,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,634,713
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,000,002
<COMMON>                                        11,972
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,627,143)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,837,242
<SALES>                                        746,359
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               746,359
<CGS>                                          933,550
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  933,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,141,533
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             201,493
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,530,217)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,530,217)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,530,217)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.06)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21716]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Seventeenth RTCA SC-209 Plenary Session Joint With EUROCAE WG49

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of 
Transportation.

ACTION: Seventeenth RTCA SC-209 Plenary Session Joint with EUROCAE 
WG49.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Seventeenth RTCA SC-209 Plenary Session Joint with EUROCAE 
WG49.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 26, 2017 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: Boeing--Longacres 25-01 
Building, 1301 SW 16th Street, Renton, WA 98055.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert Secen at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#56372533353338162422353778392431"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9d8cadcdadcd7f9cbcddad897d6cbde">[email protected]</span></a> or 
202-330-0647, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, 
Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 
833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Seventeenth RTCA SC-209 Plenary 
Session Joint with EUROCAE WG49. The agenda will include the following:
1. Host and Co-Chairs Welcome, Introductions, and Remarks
2. Review of Meeting Agenda
3. Review and Approval of the Minutes From Meeting #16 of SC-209
4. WG-1--ATCRBS/Mode S Transponder
    a. Status of MOPS Revisions
5. EUROCAE WG-49--SSR Mode S Transponders
    a. Status of MOPS Revisions
    b. Update on European Activity
6. Other Business
7. Date, Place, and Time of Future Meetings
8. Review of Action Items
9. Adjournment

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 4, 2017.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17, 
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017-21716 Filed 10-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         October 10, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 3, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add First-Class Package Service Contract 84 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-2, CP2018-2.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-21663 Filed 10-6-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P