alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE UNAUDITED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 IN THE REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 OF BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC. AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         393,383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,390,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                   309,421
<INVENTORY>                                  3,828,026
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,779,199
<PP&E>                                       1,062,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                 514,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,823,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,461,448
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,100,000
<COMMON>                                         6,968
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,112,418
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,823,625
<SALES>                                      6,144,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,144,011
<CGS>                                        4,950,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,233,231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,133)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             138,905
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,219,992)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,219,992)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23b


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated February 20, 1995, accompanying the financial
statements included in Wholesome & Hearty Foods, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.  We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Wholesome & Hearty Foods, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-64622, effective June
18, 1993, File No. 33-64624, effective June 18, 1993 and File No. 33-76764,
effective March 22, 1994).



                                        GRANT THORNTON LLP

Portland, Oregon
March 17, 1997
<PAGE>   1


                           NATIONAL PROCESSING, INC.
           EXHIBIT 11-STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                          September 30        September 30

                                         1997      1996      1997       1996        
                                         ----      ----      ----       ----
<S>                                   <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>
PRIMARY
-------                                                                 

Average Shares Outstanding             50,575     47,597    50,575     44,610

Net effect of dilutive stock options-
based on the treasury stock method
using average market price                189          0        105         0   
                                          ---          -        ---         -

Total                                  50,764     47,597     50,680    44,610
                                      -------    -------    -------   -------

Net income                            $ 7,637    $ 7,604    $15,164   $20,815  
                                      -------    -------    -------   -------

Per share amount                      $  0.15    $  0.16    $  0.30   $  0.47
                                      -------    -------    -------   -------


FULLY DILUTED
-------------

Average shares outstanding             50,575     47,597     50,575    44,610

Net effect of dilutive stock options-
basd on the treasury stock method
using the year-end market price,
if higher than average market price       247          0        137        0
                                          ---          -        ---        -

Total                                  50,822     47,597     50,712   44,610
                                      -------    -------    -------   -------

Net income                            $ 7,637    $ 7,604    $15,164  $20,815
                                      -------    -------    -------   -------

Per share amount                      $  0.15    $  0.16    $  0.30  $  0.47             
                                      -------    -------    -------   -------
</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 20343

ERIC SAMUEL TUCKER,

Petitioner

- Appellant

v. LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,
Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CV

- 1470

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HO, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Eric Samuel Tucker was convicted in Texas of aggravated assault of a family member and sentenced to 30 years imprisonment. Tucker v. State , 2016 WL 3162367, at * 1 (Tex. App. June 2, 2016). In May 2018, Tucker filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 225 4, which the district court dismissed without prejudice as duplicative of an already pending petition , filed in

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 4, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-20343 Document: 00515185302 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2019No. 18

- 20343

2 September 2017. In its order dismissing the petition, the district court did not rule whether a certificate of appealability (COA) was warrante d. Tucker now appeals to this court without a COA. A COA is required to appeal the denial of an unauthorized successive habeas petition under § 2254. See Cardenas v. Thaler , 651 F.3d 442, 443 (5th Cir. 2011). Because the district court did not issue a C OA determination, we lack jurisdiction over Tucker’s appeal. We decline to remand this case to the district court for a COA ruling because remand would be futile. See United States v. Alvarez , 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000). The district court will o nly grant a COA when “jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). No reasonable jurist could find the district court’s procedural ruling dismiss i ng Tucker’s petition debatable. Claims raised in a successive habeas petition that were raised in the initial petition must be dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1). And, any new claim must be dismissed unless the “factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence.” 28 U.S.C. § 22 4 4(b)(2)(B)(i). Here, all but one of Tucker’s claims were raised in his first petition, and the lone new claim is an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, which no r easonable jurist could find was undiscoverable when Tucker filed his first petition. Because remanding for the district court to rule on the COA would be pointless , we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. For the forgoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed

. Case: 18-20343 Document: 00515185302 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2019
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership III-A ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 29th day of March, 2006.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP III-A
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 12.1**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I,Valter Moro, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.(“Endesa Chile”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this deport is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reportingto be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 29, 2016
GLD-028 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-3557

___________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

TINA FAKE,

 Appellant

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(M.D. Pa. Crim. No. 1-05-cr-00426)

District Judge: Hon. William W. Caldwell

____________________________________

Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

or Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

October 27, 2011

Before: FUENTES, GREENAWAY, JR. and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: November 17, 2011)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

Tina Fake was sentenced to 136 months of imprisonment after she pleaded guilty 

in April 2006 to one count of “health care fraud resulting in serious bodily injury” and 

one count of criminal forfeiture. Instead of taking a direct appeal, Fake filed a collateral 
2

attack motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The District Court denied the motion on May 8, 

2008, and we denied Fake‟s request for a certificate of appealability. See United States v. 

Fake, C.A. No. 08-2789 (3d Cir. Dec. 5, 2008).

On July 22, 2011, Fake filed a self-styled application for a “writ of error coram 

vobis.” Fake contended in that application that she was “‟denied‟ her 5th , 6th, [and] 

14th Amendment[ rights], where the prosecution set forth „materially false facts‟ by a 

deliberate deception of the courts by the presentation of known false evidence which is 

incompatible with rudimentary demands of justice.”

By order entered August 25, 2011, the District Court denied Fake‟s application. 

The District Court found it to be “nothing more than a second 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, 

but under a different name.” The District Court explained to Fake that if she “wishes to 

file a successive § 2255 motion, she must seek leave to do so from the Third Circuit 

Court of Appeals.” Fake filed a notice of appeal.1

We will summarily affirm the District Court‟s August 25, 2011 order because this 

appeal fails to present a substantial question. See Murray v. Bledsoe, 650 F.3d 246, 247 

(3d Cir. 2011) (per curiam). Fake‟s application for a writ of error coram vobis was an 

impermissible successive collateral attack, and the District Court appropriately rejected it 

as such. See Robinson v. Johnson, 313 F.3d 128, 139-40 (3d Cir. 2002). 

We note for Fake‟s benefit that the presumptive means by which a federal prisoner 

can challenge the validity of her conviction or sentence is a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255. See Okereke v. United States, 307 F.3d 117, 120 (3d Cir. 2002). In order to file 

 

1

 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 
3

a second or successive § 2255 motion, Fake must apply for permission directly from this 

Court and meet the gatekeeping standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h).
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Appian,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004,  as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, F.  Britton
McConkie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ F. BRITTON MC CONKIE
----------------------------
F. Britton McConkie
Chief Executive Officer
July 12, 2005

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,426,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,563,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   380,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,637,000
<PP&E>                                      19,290,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,236,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             102,366,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,511,000
<BONDS>                                     74,118,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               102,366,000
<SALES>                                     33,913,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,913,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,884,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,194,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,710,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,875,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (50,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,925,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,925,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.97)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23
                          SENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Cecil Bancorp, Inc.
Elkton, Maryland


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement Numbers 333-35120 on Form S-3 and 033-81374 on Form S-8 of Cecil
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries (Cecil Bancorp) of our report dated January 31,
2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Cecil Bancorp as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which
report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Cecil
Bancorp.


                                                     /s/ Stegman & Company



Baltimore, Maryland
March 28, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          21,345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,192
<INVENTORY>                                      6,979
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,791
<PP&E>                                          15,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,754
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           156
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,447
<SALES>                                         10,469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,102
<CGS>                                            5,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (79)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    509
<INCOME-TAX>                                       210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                299
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       299
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>