alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2



Liquid Audio, Inc.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:



| | 1. |  | Seymour Holtzman is the Co-Chief Executive Officer of Liquid Audio, Inc. (the Company).
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | To the best of my knowledge:
| | -- |  | ----------------------------



| | (A) |  | The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) |  | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    SEYMOUR HOLTZMANSeymour Holtzman Co-Chief Executive Officer May 15, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6142
LESTER YOUNG, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus MICHAEL MOORE, Director of South Carolina Department of Correction; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-96-570-4-18BE) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lester Young, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Young v. Moore , No. CA-96-570-4-18BE (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

February 10, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00689

- CR

Calvin Pierre HOPKINS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial D istrict Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR10972 Honorable Ron Rangel , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due on December 14 , 2022. Appellant did not timely file
the brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief

. On December 16, 2022, we advised Appellant’s counsel Patrick B. Montgomery by e

mail that the brief was overdue and inquired about its status. Counsel did not respond.

On December 21, 2022, we ordered counsel to file a motion for extension of time, a
moti on to dismiss, or the brief by January 3, 2023

. We warned counsel that i f no brief or motion

wa s filed by that date, we would abate this appeal to the trial court for an abandonment hearing
without further notice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2). Counsel did not respond.

Accordingly, we abated this appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court to con duct a hearing in compliance with Rule 38.8(b) to determine whether Appellant desires to prosecute his appeal and whether new appellate counsel should be appointed.

Two days before the February 9, 2023 hearing, counsel filed an Anders brief. Based on the hearing and given the brief had been filed , t he trial court found that Appellant wants to maintain this appeal and the question s regarding repla cing Patrick B. Montgomery as court

appointed appellate counsel w ere moot

.
We REINSTATE the appellate timetable. The State’s brief is due on March 9, 2023._________________________________ P atricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of February, 2023

.

___________________________ _______ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                       OF
                        PAINEWEBBER/GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME
                            LIMITED PARTNERSHIP III-F


       The undersigned  General Partner hereby duly executes this Certificate of
Limited  Partnership of  PaineWebber/Geodyne  Energy Income Limited  Partnership
III-F (the  "Partnership"),  which is being filed with the Secretary of State of
Oklahoma in accordance with the Oklahoma  Revised  Uniform  Limited  Partnership
Act.

       1.    The name of the Partnership is PaineWebber/Geodyne  Energy Income
Limited Partnership III-F.

       2. The address of the registered  office of the  Partnership is 320 South
Boston,  The Mezzanine,  Tulsa,  Oklahoma 74103,  and the name of the registered
agent whose business  office  address will be the same as the registered  office
address is Geodyne Production Company.

       3. The address of the principal  office of the  Partnership in the United
States  where its  partnership  records are to be kept or made  available is c/o
Geodyne  Production  Company,  320 South Boston Avenue,  the  Mezzanine,  Tulsa,
Oklahoma 74103-3708.

       4. The name,  the mailing  address and the street address of the business
or residence of each general partner of the Partnership are as follows:

Name                      Mailing Address            Business Address
----                      ---------------            ----------------
Geodyne Production        320 S. Boston Ave.         320 S. Boston Ave.
Company                   The Mezzanine              The Mezzanine
                          Tulsa, OK 74103-3708       Tulsa, 0K 74103-3708

       5.    The latest  date upon which the  Partnership  is to  dissolve  is
March 5, 2011.

       SIGNED on this 7th day of March, 1991.


                                         GENERAL PARTNER:

                                         Geodyne Production Company
                                         a Delaware corporation

                                         By: /s/ Michael E. Luttrell
                                             -----------------------
                                             Michael E. Luttrell
                                             Executive Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,709,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,218,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   908,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,858,000
<PP&E>                                      29,629,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,334,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,585,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,060,000
<BONDS>                                     76,658,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (480,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               105,585,000
<SALES>                                     57,787,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,787,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,144,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            27,527,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,600,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,484,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (525,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,009,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,009,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.64)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligroup, Inc, (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Madhu Poomalil, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange   Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.                  

|DATE:  May   12, 2006 | By: | /s/ Madhu Poomalil     
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                      |     |                        
|                      |     | Madhu Poomalil         
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**906 CERTIFICATION**

 

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the amendedannual report on Form 20-F/A for the year endedDecember 31, 2009 (the “report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

 

JoaquínGalindo V., the Chief Executive Officer and Eduardo Escaffi J., the ChiefFinancial Officer of Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (“Endesa Chile”),each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.               thereport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act; and

 

2.               theinformation contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Endesa Chile.

 

Date: November 26, 2010.

 

 
|   | /s/  Joaquín Galindo V.   |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | Name:  Joaquín Galindo V. |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer       |
|   |                           |
|   |                           |
|   | /s/  Eduardo Escaffi J.        |
|   | Name: Eduardo Escaffi J.       |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer       |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006
(the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 August 9, 2006
    
    /s/ Louis Salamone Jr.Louis Salamone Jr.
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,678,415
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         502,207
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,129,696
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       3,021,844
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         3,021,805
<LOANS>                                     49,779,988
<ALLOWANCE>                                    117,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,263,623
<DEPOSITS>                                  47,365,022
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,345,515
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,694
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,048,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,053,086
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,301,685
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              132,425
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               221,181
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,655,291
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,101,388
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,235,955
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,419,336
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  102,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              84,276
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,015,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                616,610
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     616,610
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   314,909
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.32
<LOANS-NON>                                    486,300
<LOANS-PAST>                                   486,300
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               114,412
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   99,221
<RECOVERIES>                                    20,017
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              117,691
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           117,691
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-167204, 333-146354, 333-139416, 333-109556 and 333-106434) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-133058, 333-122818, 333-117734, 333-113938, 333-105538, 333-89834,333-61334 and 333-53530) of Vermillion, Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose,California 

February 25, 2011
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of SRS Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Janet M. Biski, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofmy knowledge:

 

3.                                     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

4.                                     The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 12, 2004 |   |                    |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                     | By:    | /s/ Janet M. Biski      |
|                     |   | Janet M. Biski          |
| ** **               |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


May 3, 2018


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 380 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on May 2, 2018, in accordance
with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to
the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration
Statement (No. 333-223396) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the
Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6202

SAMUEL L. FARNSWORTH, 

 Petitioner – Appellant, 

 v. 

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections, 

 Respondent – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District 

Judge. (2:07-cv-00183-RBS-TEM) 

Submitted: September 26, 2008 Decided: November 5, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Samuel L. Farnsworth, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell 

Theisen, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Samuel L. Farnsworth seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Farnsworth 

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          11,780
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         314,235
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 313,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        192,047
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         23
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   313,613
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,965
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,986
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,561)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,561)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)


</TABLE>