alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2663 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2663

      To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase certain 
       infrastructure finance provisions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2009

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which 
   was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase certain 
       infrastructure finance provisions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transportation Infrastructure 
Finance and Innovation Act of 2009'' or ``TIFIA of 2009''.

SEC. 2. SECURED LOANS.

    (a) Maximum Amount.--Section 603(b) of title 23, United States 
Code, is amended as follows:
            (1) in paragraph (2) by striking ``33'' and inserting 
        ``49''; and
            (2) in paragraph (6) by inserting after ``project 
        obligations'' the following: ``entered into after (not 
        including such obligations issued to refund prior project 
        obligations), or not contemplated by the parties at the time, 
        the agreement to provide the secured loan is entered into under 
        this section''.

SEC. 3. LINES OF CREDIT.

    Section 604(b) of title 23, United States Code, is amended as 
follows:
            (1) in paragraph (2) by striking ``33'' and inserting 
        ``49''; and
            (2) in paragraph (8) by inserting after ``project 
        obligations'' the following: ``entered into after (not 
        including such obligations issued to refund prior project 
        obligations), or not contemplated by the parties at the time, 
        the agreement to provide the line of credit is entered into 
        under this section''.

SEC. 4. FUNDING.

    Section 608(a) of title 23, United States Code, is amended as 
follows:
            (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ``each of fiscal years 
        2005 through 2009.'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2009 and 
        $285,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2015.''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3) by striking ``each of fiscal years 
        2005 through 2009.'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2009 and 
        $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2015.''
                                 <all>
```
---



Exhibit 13

William J. Crowl, R.G.

GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES, LLC

5757 Central Avenue, Suite D, Boulder, Colorado 80301

Telephone: 303-443-2209

Facsimile: 303-443-3156



CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 10, 2009

British Columbia Securities Commission

Alberta Securities Commission

Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission

Manitoba Securities Commission

Ontario Securities Commission

New Brunswick Securities Commission

Nova Scotia Securities Commission

Registrar of Securities, Prince Edward Island

Securities Commission of Newfoundland and Labrador

Registrar of Securities, Northwest Territories

Registrar of Securities, Nunavut

Registrar of Securities, Yukon

United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Re:

Annual Information Form dated March 10, 2009 (the Annual Information Form) of Minefinders Corporation Inc. (the Company).



I refer to the report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Minable Reserve for the Dolores Gold-Silver Project, Chihuahua State, Mexico" dated March 25, 2008 (the "Report") as referenced in the Annual Information Form and documents incorporated by reference therein.



This letter is being filed as my consent to the use of my name and the Report in the Annual Information Form and in documents incorporated by reference therein.



I confirm that I have read the Annual Information Form and I have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations that are derived from the Report referred to above or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services I performed in connection with such Report.



I consent to the filing of this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Company's Form 40-F dated March 10, 2009, and any amendment thereto,  including post-effective amendments and as part of a post-effective amendment to the Company's Form F-10, to incorporate the Company's Form 40-F dated March 10, 2009.

|             |                      |  | 
|------------ | -------------------- |  | 
|Yours truly,
|            
|             | /s/ William J. Crowl
|             | William J. Crowl    





---
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Intelligroup,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Nicholas Visco, Senior Vice  President-Finance  and Administration
and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


DATE: November 14, 2003               By: /s/ Nicholas Visco
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      Nicholas Visco
                                      Senior Vice President-Finance and
                                      Administration and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  Percentage
                  Subsidiary                      Incorporated In                   Owned
                  ----------                      ---------------                   -----
<S>                                               <C>                             <C>
         Medicis, The Dermatology Company(R)        Delaware                        100%

         Medicis Dermatologics, Inc.                Delaware                        100%

         Dermavest, Inc.                            Nevada                          100%

         Advanced Pharmaceutical Research           Delaware                        100%

         Medicis Acquisition Corporation            Delaware                        100%

         Medicis Manufacturing Corporation          Delaware                        100%

         Medicis Partners, Inc.                     Delaware                        100%

         GenDerm Corporation                        Delaware                        100%

         Medicis Canada, Ltd                        Canada                          100%

         Ucyclyd Pharma, Inc.                       Maryland                        100%

         Ascent Pediatrics, Inc.                    Delaware                        100%
</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANTOS FRANCISCO JUANTA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71122

Agency No. A095-753-541

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 25, 2015** 

Before: McKEOWN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Santos Francisco Juanta, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order declining to

remand and dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his

request for a continuance. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

FILED

SEP 03 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
review for abuse of discretion both the denial of a motion for a continuance,

Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008), and the denial of

a motion to remand, Movsisian v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1095, 1097-98 (9th Cir.

2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Juanta’s motion for a

continuance to file an application for a U visa, where Juanta had been granted five

continuances for the purpose of filing an application for a U visa, but had failed to

do so. See Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (no abuse of discretion by denying a

motion for a continuance where the relief sought was not immediately available to

petitioner).

To the extent Juanta challenges the BIA’s decision not to remand in light of

evidence Juanta submitted on appeal relating to his U visa eligibility, the BIA did

not abuse its discretion in declining to remand, where Juanta did not submit

evidence that he had actually filed an application for a U visa and, therefore, had

not established that he warranted remand for a further continuance. See id. 

To the extent Juanta challenges his detention and the agency’s denial of

bond or parole, those contentions are not properly before us. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1226(e); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19(d); Leonardo v. Crawford, 646 F.3d 1157, 1160 (9th

2 12-71122
Cir. 2011) (noting entitlement to bond hearing for certain aliens held in custody

and setting forth procedure for challenging bond determinations). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

3 12-71122
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Q of Digital Lightwave, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"report"), I Kenneth T. Myers, President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: May 14, 2008



By:

/s/ KENNETH T. MYERSKenneth T. MyersPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: May 14, 2008



By:

/s/ KENNETH T. MYERSKenneth T. MyersChief Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
---

Exhibit 99.10

Tel: 604 688 5421
     BDO Canada LLPFax: 604 688 5132
     600 Cathedral Placewww.bdo.ca
     925 West Georgia StreetVancouver BC V6C 3L2 Canada
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors 
Minefinders Corporation Ltd. We consent to the inclusion to the annual report on Form 40-F of our independent auditors report dated March 5, 2008 on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders equity and cash flows of Minefinders Corporation Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2007 which is contained in the annual report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-103893, 333-108001, 333-111255, and 333-117611) on Form S-8 and (SEC No. 333-138709 and 333-155590) on Form F-10 of the Company of our report dated March 5, 2008, with respect to the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders equity and cash flows of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 included herein. /s/ BDO Canada LLP Vancouver, Canada February 25, 2010 BDO Canada LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership, is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-07951) pertaining to the Alabama National BanCorporation 1994
Stock Option Plan of our report dated February 29, 1996, with respect to the
1995 consolidated financial statements of Alabama National BanCorporation (not
presented separately in the 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K) which report is    
included in Alabama National BanCorporation's Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1996, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.


                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Birmingham, Alabama
March 26, 1997





                                        1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10626

Summary Calendar

DENNIS BOYLE,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

WARDEN WILSON,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:19-CV-327

Before JOLLY, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dennis Boyle, federal prisoner # 75596-097, appeals the dismissal for 

lack of subject matter jurisdiction of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging 

the constitutionality of certain Bureau of Prisons program statements that 

restrict his ability to use the prison’s electronic messaging system. The district 

court held that Boyle’s challenge was to the conditions of his confinement and, 

as such, it was not cognizable on § 2241 review. We review de novo the district 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 4, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-10626 Document: 00515514983 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/04/2020
19-10626

2

court’s dismissal of the § 2241 petition on the pleadings. See Pack v. Yusuff, 

218 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir. 2000).

A § 2241 habeas petition is the proper procedural vehicle for challenging 

an action that “directly implicates the duration of” a prisoner’s confinement. 

Davis v. Fechtel, 150 F.3d 486, 487, 490 (5th Cir. 1998). It is not, however, the 

proper procedural vehicle for claims, such as Boyle’s, regarding the conditions 

of confinement. See id. at 490; Carson v. Johnson, 112 F.3d 818, 820-21 (5th 

Cir. 1997). Boyle therefore has shown no error on the part of the district court. 

See Pack, 218 F.3d at 451.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-10626 Document: 00515514983 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/04/2020
|                                |   |                                                                          |   |                  |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|
| Subsidiaries      of the Registrant |
| Name      of Subsidiary             |   |   State      or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization |   | Percentage      Owned |
|                                |   |                                                                          |   |                  |
| Tix4Tonight,      LLC               |   | Nevada                                                                        |   | 100%                  |
|                                |   |                                                                          |   |                  |
| Exhibit      Merchandising, LLC     |   | Nevada                                                                        |   | 100%                  |
|                                |   |                                                                          |   |                  |
| Tix      Productions, Inc.          |   | Utah                                                                          |   | 100%                  |
|                                |   |                                                                          |   |                  |

----
#### In re: John S. BREEN; Teresa J. Breen, Debtors. John S. Breen; Teresa J. Breen, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. Zvi Guttman, Trustee—Appellee.

No. 09-2340.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 26, 2010.

Decided: Aug. 31, 2010.

John S. Breen, Teresa J. Breen, Appellants Pro Se. Zvi Guttman, Law Offices of Zvi Guttman, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John S. Breen and Teresa J. Breen appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Breen v. Guttman,*Nos. 1:09-cv-02315-RDB; BK-02-58017-RAG (D. Md. Sept. 21, 2009; filed Nov. 3, 2009, entered Nov. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 271 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the standard 

charitable mileage rate for delivery of meals to elderly, disabled, frail 

and at risk individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2009 

Mr. LATTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the standard charitable mileage rate for delivery of meals 

to elderly, disabled, frail and at risk individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN STANDARD MILEAGE RATE FOR 

4 DELIVERY OF MEALS TO ELDERLY, DIS5 ABLED, FRAIL AND AT RISK INDIVIDUALS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (i) of section 170 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to standard 

8 mileage rate for use of passenger automobile) is amended 

9 by inserting ‘‘(58.5 cents per mile in the case of the delivVerDate Nov 24 2008 18:35 Jan 11, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H271.IH H271

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 271 IH

1 ery of meals to homebound individuals who are elderly, 

2 disabled, frail or at risk)’’ before the period at the end. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall apply to miles driven on or after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

December 31, 2004

Mr. Jorge C. Rangel

The Rangel Law Firm, P.C.

615 Upper N.  Broadway, Suite 2020

Corpus Christi, TX 78403-2683

Mr. Francisco J. Rodriguez

Rodriguez Tovar & De Los Santos, LLP

1111 West Nolana

McAllen, TX 78504-3747

Mr. Neil E. Norquest

Norquest & Brisack, L.L.P.

4900 N. 10th Street,  Bldg.  A-2

McAllen, TX 78504-2830

RE:Case Number:  02-1182

Court of Appeals Number:  13-00-00275-CV

Trial Court Number:  C-4118-94-B(2)

Style:HAGGAR APPAREL COMPANY

v.

MARIA O. LEAL

Dear Counsel:

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment.  The Court delivered the enclosed opinion and judgment.

Encl.

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Nancy J. Vega, Chief Deputy Clerk

**Case No. 02-1182Page 2**
---

Exhibit 25

CONSENT OF EXPERT February 24, 2011 British Columbia Securities CommissionAlberta Securities CommissionSaskatchewan Financial Services CommissionManitoba Securities CommissionOntario Securities CommissionNew Brunswick Securities CommissionNova Scotia Securities CommissionRegistrar of Securities, Prince Edward IslandSecurities Commission of Newfoundland and LabradorRegistrar of Securities, Northwest TerritoriesRegistrar of Securities, NunavutRegistrar of Securities, YukonUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Re:
     Annual Information Form dated February 24, 2011 (the Annual Information Form) of Minefinders Corporation Inc. (the Company).
 I refer to the report entitled "Technical Report, La Bolsa Project, Pre-feasibility Study dated January 10, 2011 (the "Report") as referenced in the Annual Information Form and documents incorporated by reference therein. I hereby consent to the use of my name and the Report in the Annual Information Form and in documents incorporated by reference therein. I confirm that I have read the Annual Information Form and I have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations that are derived from the Report referred to above or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services I performed in connection with such Report. I consent to the filing of this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Companys Form 40-F dated February 24, 2011, and any amendment thereto, including post-effective amendments and as part of a post-effective amendment to the Companys Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-170839), to incorporate the Companys Form 40-F dated February 24, 2011.


---

- 2 - Yours truly, Per: /s/ Kenneth L. MyersKenneth L. Myers February 24, 2011


---
|                                                           |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                           |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                      |   | Three Months Ended |
|                                                      |   | June 30, |
|                                                      |   | 2011 | 2010 |
| Loss per common share - basic                             |   |   |   |
| Net (loss) income                                         |   | $ | (6,131 | ) | $ | (2,491 | ) |
| Less: Capital Purchased Program "CPP" Preferred Dividends |   | 96 |  | 237 |  |
| Dividends paid and undistributed (losses)/earnings        |   |   |   |
| allocated to participating securities                     |   | — |  | (22 | ) |
| Net Loss Available to Common Shareholders                 |   | $ | (6,227 | ) | $ | (2,706 | ) |
|                                                      |   |   |   |
|                                                      |   |   |   |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding                |   | 2,485,815 |  | 2,482,740 |  |
|                                                      |   |   |   |
| Loss per common share                                     |   | $ | (2.51 | ) | $ | (1.09 | ) |
| Diluted Loss per common share                             |   | N/A |  | N/A |  |