alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          70,813
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             225
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                57,076
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 5,534
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    289,558
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          34,655
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            35,214
<LOANS>                                      1,106,074
<ALLOWANCE>                                     16,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,672,049
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,275,175
<SHORT-TERM>                                    21,700
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             47,714
<LONG-TERM>                                     32,328
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,972
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,672,049
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 92,208
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               18,870
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 4,626
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               115,704
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              46,415
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,555
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           59,149
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,796
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 174
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 61,164
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,539
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      25,539
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,732
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.36
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,357
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   499
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 25,400
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                14,844
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,864
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,764
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               16,540
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            16,540
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         16,540
        

</TABLE>
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-12-00748- CV
Michael P atric k Jacobs, S r., and Charlotte Jac obs, ind ividu ally and as Next F riends of J.K. and Z.J., m inors, App ellants
v. Taser Inter national , Inc., Appellee
F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 261 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 0-0 0362 2, H ONO RAB LE GUS J. STRAUSS, JR., J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants have filed a motion reque sting tha t this appea l be dis missed. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appe al. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1).

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Field Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: August 2, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,259
<SECURITIES>                                     1,521
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,580
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,257
<PP&E>                                           2,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,197
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,546
<SALES>                                          7,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,250
<CGS>                                              561
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (91)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (30)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    156
<INCOME-TAX>                                       236
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (80)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (80)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

June 8, 2018

By the Court :

No. 17-3163

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., et al ., Plaintiffs-Appellees , v

.

COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al ., Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

No. 1:16-cv-00763-TWP-DML

Tanya Walton Pratt, J udge

.

O R D E R

Defendants-appellants have requested en banc review in this case limited to the question of the constitutionality of Ind. Co de § 16-34-3-4, which regulates the disposal of fetal remains after an abortion or misc arriage. A majority of the judges in active service have voted to grant the state’s petiti on. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing en banc is GRANTED . Part II.B of the panel’s opinion of April 19, 2018, Planned Parenthood of Ind. and Ky., Inc. v. Comm’r of the Ind. State Dept. of Health, 888 F.3d 300, 307–10 (7th Cir. 2018), is VACATED , and the judgment is also VACATED insofar as it affirmed the district court’s decision to enjoin enforcement of the fetal disposition statute. The court will set a date for the en banc oral argument by separate order.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


As adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter ended September 30, 2010 of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), E. Gerald Kay, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Integrated BioPharma, Inc.certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
November 15, 2010
By: /s/ E Gerald Kay E, Gerald Kay,
 President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Appian,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2005,  as filed  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, F.
Britton McConkie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ F. BRITTON MC CONKIE
----------------------------
F. Britton McConkie
Chief Executive Officer
November 21, 2005

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Bryan Bancorp of Georgia, Inc.
Richmond Hill, Georgia

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Bryan Bancorp of Georgia,
Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
the years then ended (not included herein). These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bryan Bancorp of
Georgia, Inc. and subsidiary at December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/  MOORE STEPHENS TILLER LLC
    (Formerly Tiller, Stewart & Company LLC)

Savannah, Georgia
January 30, 1998
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 15, 2011 

y0608 

Order 

 

June 15, 2011 

142658 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142658 

 COA: 293912 

Allegan CC: 2008-015937-FH 

JOSHUA ALLEN YEAKEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to the Court that the 

cases of People v Pullen (Docket No. 142751) and People v Watkins (Docket No. 

142031) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases 

may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that 

the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.
INDEPENDENT AGENCIES AND GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS 265

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION - Continued

Fairmont, WV Director, Independent Vacant

Verification and Validation 

Facility

ES ... ...... ...... ......

OFFICE OF POLICY AND 

PLANS

Washington, DC Associate Administrator for Lori B. Garver

Policy & Plans

ES NA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Deputy Associate Administrator Career Incumbent

for Policy & Plans

ES CA ...... ...... ......

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

OFFICE OF THE ARCHIVIST 

OF THE U. S.

College Park, MD Archivist of the United States John W. Carlin EX PAS III ...... ......

Washington, DC Presidential Diarist Ellen M. McCathran GS SC 13 ...... ......

General Counsel

College Park, MD General Counsel Career Incumbent ES CA ...... ...... ......

Communications Staff

 Do........... Director, Congressional and Career Incumbent

Legislative Affairs

ES CA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Director, Communications Staff Gerald W. George ES NA ...... ...... ......

Information Security Oversight 

Office

Washington, DC Director, Information Security Career Incumbent

Oversight Office

ES CA ...... ...... ......

Office of Regional Records 

Services

St. Louis, MO Director, National Personnel Career Incumbent

Records Center

ES CA ...... ...... ......

Office of Presidential Libraries

Simi Valley, CA Director, Ronald Reagan Library R. Duke Blackwood ES EA ...... ...... 12/18/01

Atlanta, GA Director, Jimmy Carter Library Jay E. Hakes ES EA ...... ...... 12/03/01

Boston, MA Director, John F. Kennedy Vacant

Library

ES ... ...... ...... ......

Grand Rapids, MI Director, Gerald R. Ford Library Vacant ES ... ...... ...... ......

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION

Washington, DC Chairman Harvey B. Gantt PD PA $443.52 6 years 01/01/99

 Do........... Commission Member Robert A. Gaines PD PA $443.52 6 years 01/01/03

 Do........... Commission Member Margaret G. Vanderhye PD PA $443.52 6 years 01/01/01

 Do........... Commission Member Arrington L. Dixon PD XS $443.52 4 years 01/02/03

 Do........... Commission Member Patricia S. Elwood PD XS $443.52 4 years 01/02/03
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,314
<SECURITIES>                                       270
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                       373
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,210
<PP&E>                                           4,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,022
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,545
<SALES>                                          7,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,141
<CGS>                                              716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (10)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  50
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (143)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (345)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (345)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        



</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.4 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Harry A. Goldgut, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Great Lakes Power
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and
have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




---



##### 



(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers
internal control over financial reporting. Dated: May 19, 2004 /s/ Harry A. GoldgutHarry A. GoldgutCo-Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                     As adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
                         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter ended
September 30, 2006 of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), E.
Gerald Kay, the Chief Executive Officer of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. certifies,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to his knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
         78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
         material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:   November 13, 2006           By: /s/ E. Gerald Kay
                                     E. Gerald Kay
                                     Chief Executive Officer
#### In re K.H. & P.D.D.

Case below: 177 N.C. App. 110

No. 204A06

1. Allowed, COA opinion vacated 08/17/06

2. Dismissed as moot 08/17/06

3. Denied 08/17/06

1. Respondent’s (Father) Motion to Dismiss Appeal (COA05-655)

2. Respondent’s (Father) Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief on 7-19-06

3. Guardian ad Litem’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31