alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-82,597-05
IN RE MICHAEL JEFF COAT, Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 13-0211-CC 1 IN THE COUNT COURT AT L AW NO. 1

F ROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an a pplication for a

writ of mandamus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. This matter arises from a misdemeanor conviction, which Relator challeng ed by way of a post-conviction habea s application pursuant to Article 11.09 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e. After the trial court denied relief , Relator appea led to the Third Court of Appea ls, which aff irmed the trial c ourt’s dec ision. Relator allege d that he did not rec eive n o t i ce of t he appellate decision until it was too late to file a motion for rehe aring
. Relator ultimately filed an application for writ of habea s corpus in the trial court seeking an out-of-time motion for rehe aring , pursuant to this Court’s holding in Ex parte Valdez , __ S.W .3d

__ (T ex . C ri m . App. May 4, 2016). The trial court g rante d relief , permitting2

Relator to fi l e h i s m o t i o n for rehe aring on or befor e J uly 13, 2016. Relator filed his out-of-time 1 motion for rehe aring on J uly 5, 2016. On J u l y 7 , 2 016, the Clerk of the Third Court of Appea ls issued a letter advising Relator that beca use the appellate mandate had issued on October 23, 2014,
no action wou ld be taken on the m otion for rehea ring
. Relator now asks t his Court to compel the Third Court of Appea ls to rule on the out-of-time motion for rehear i n g gra n t ed to him by the Wil liamson County

Court at L aw No. 1. R es p o ndent, the Third District Court of Appea ls, shall file a response with this C o u rt b y stating whether Relator s ubmitted a copy of an order of t he W illiamson C ounty Court at L aw No. 1, g ranting Relat or an out-of-time motion for rehe aring , and if so, whether the Third Court of Appea ls has ruled on Relator’s out-of-time motion for rehe aring
. Respondent’s answe r shall be submitt ed within 30 day s of the date of this order
. This application for leave to file a wr i t of mandamus will be held in abe y ance until R espondent ha s submitt ed re sponse.
Filed: Aug ust 24, 2016 Do not publish

Relator has not provide d this Court wit h a copy of the trial c ourt’s orde r g rantingrelief , 1 or a c itation to such order.
Exhibit



EXECUTION COPY 






April 27, 2018
Bill Wilson
Address on file with the Company
		
	Re: 
	Employment Agreement Amendment


Dear Bill:
This letter confirms our recent discussions regarding certain changes to your Employment Agreement, dated October 16, 2017, with Townsquare Media, Inc. (the “Company”).  Except as otherwise set forth herein, the terms and conditions of your Employment Agreement will be unaffected by this letter.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein will have the meaning set forth in your Employment Agreement.
		
	•
	Base Salary.  Effective immediately, your Base Salary will increase to $1,000,000.




		
	•
	Annual Bonus.  Your annual cash bonus for each of the Company’s 2018 and 2019 fiscal years will be no less than your Target Bonus.






*  *  *
We are looking forward to your continued leadership.
















[Signature Page Follows]






















 


	
			
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Townsquare Media, Inc.

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	/s/ David Quick

	 
	 
	By: David Quick

	 
	 
	Title: Chair, Compensation Committee

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 

	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Bill Wilson
	 
	 

	Bill Wilson
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 


























































Signature Page to Employment Agreement
INTELLIGROUP, INC.

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligroup, Inc, (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alok
Bajpai, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                  

|DATE: August 13,
      2008 | By: | /s/ Alok Bajpai              
|--------------------------- | --- | -----------------------------
|                           
|                            |     | Alok Bajpai                  
|                            |     | Chief Financial
      Officer

33

---
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of
Tata Motors Limited (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



|i. | the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2015 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|ii. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 30, 2015



|                                           |  | 
|------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ Ravindra Pisharody                     |  | 
|Ravindra Pisharody                         |  | 
|Executive Director  Commercial Vehicles   |  | 
|                                           |  | 
|/s/ C. Ramakrishnan                        |  | 
|C. Ramakrishnan                            |  | 
|Tata Motors Group Chief Financial Officer |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN THE
REGISTRANT'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  9/30/99 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001016439
<NAME>                        Intelligroup, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         8,550
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  39,244
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,322
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               63,597
<PP&E>                                         15,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5,311
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 82,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          33,757
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       156
<OTHER-SE>                                     47,139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   82,238
<SALES>                                        141,528
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,528
<CGS>                                          91,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (110)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,966)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (552)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,414)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,414)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.16) <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.16) <F2>
<FN>
<F1>      This amount represents Basic Earnings per Share in accordance with the
          requirements of Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards No. 128 -
          "Earnings per Share".

<F2>      This amount  represents  Diluted Earnings per Share in accordance with
          the  requirements of Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards No.
          128 - "Earnings per Share".
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                  Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

        The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of LCC International, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

        (a)     the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
                September 30, 2003, filed on the date hereof with the Securities
                and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (b)     information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to LCC International, Inc. and will be retained by LCC
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.




                             /s/ Graham B. Perkins
                             ---------------------------------------------
                             Graham B. Perkins
                             Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                             Officer and Treasurer
                             October 24, 2003
#### In the Matter of Gary Nelson, Appellant, v Georgia Murray, Respondent.

[665 NYS2d 875]

—Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about December 5, 1995, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied petitioner’s request for overnight visitation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is sufficient basis in the record for the court’s conclusion that petitioner’s drinking habits would be likely to impair his ability to care for the child during overnight visits *(see, B. v B.,*184 AD2d 609). We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jonathan Almonte, Appellant.

[987 NYS2d 152]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), rendered December 9, 2010, as amended January 12, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of four years, unanimously affirmed.

The challenged evidence presented regarding other crimes and bad acts, and the related arguments in the prosecutor’s summation, were generally relevant for purposes other than criminal propensity *(see generally People v Cass,*18 NY3d 553, 559-560 [2012]). Some portions of the proof at issue were relevant to consciousness of guilt and others tended to complete a coherent narrative. To the extent that some elements of the challenged evidence did not have a legitimate nonpropensity purpose or had the potential for undue prejudice, and to the extent any portions of the prosecutor’s summation were inappropriate, the court’s curative actions minimized any prejudice, and any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P, Friedman, Saxe and Feinman, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended October 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Joel N. Waller, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. December 9, 2004
    
    /s/ Joel N. WallerJoel N. WallerChairman and Chief
Executive Officer
(principal executive
officer)
1 The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-2760

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Quentin C. Adams, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 5, 2006 Filed: July 10, 2006

___________ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. A jury found Quentin C. Adams (Adams) guilty of one count of conspiring to distribute more than 50 grams of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; two counts of possessing with intent to distribu te more than 5 grams of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); and one count of aidi ng and abetting the distribution of cocaine base in violati on of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court 1 sentenced Adams to a total of life imprisonment and 8 years’ supervised release. On appeal, Adams’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v.-2- California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and moved to withdraw. Adams filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Counsel argues the district court abus ed its discretion by allowing evidence of Adams’s 2000 Missouri conviction for sec ond-degree drug trafficking under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) because it was too remote in time from the instant offenses. We find no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Love , 419 F.3d 825, 828 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review; finding no abuse of discretion as to prior convictions that were even more remote in time).
Adams argues the evidence is insufficient to support any of his convictions. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and giving the government the benefit of all reasonable in ferences that can be drawn from the evidence, as we must, we concludethe evidence is sufficient. See United States v. White , 241 F.3d 1015, 1021-22 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review; elements of conspiracy conviction); United States v. Rodgers , 18 F.3d 1425, 1429 (8th Cir. 1994) (elements of possession-with-intent convi ctions); United States v. Ellefson , 419 F.3d 859, 863 (8th Cir. 2005) (elements of aiding-and-abetting conviction).
Finally, after reviewing the recordindependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we conclude there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with China Grand Resorts, Inc.s (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  China Grand Resorts, Inc.  /s/ Menghua Liu Menghua Liu Chief Executive Officer Date: January 13, 2010  /s/ Carl Zhou Carla Zhou Chief Financial Officer Date January 13, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of LCC International, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) |  | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2004, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, our financial condition and results of operations.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Graham B. Perkins

Graham B. Perkins
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
May 14, 2004
#### Dean Philip HARRIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ESTATE OF Dr. Ian Robert DUNCAN, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 09-35430.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 10, 2011.

Dean Phillip Harris, Salem, OR, pro se.

Denise Gale Fjordbeck, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Oregon Attorney, Salem, OR, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Oregon state prisoner Dean Philip Harris appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004), and we may affirm on any ground supported by the record, *O’Guinn v. Lovelock Corr. Ctr.,*502 F.3d 1056, 1059 (9th Cir.2007). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Harris failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendant was deliberately indifferent to his lower back pain. *See Toguchi,*391 F.3d at 1060 (“Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard. A showing of medical malpractice or negligence is insufficient to establish a constitutional deprivation under the Eighth Amendment.”); *Nelson v. Pima Cmty. Coll.*83 F.3d 1075, 1081-82 (9th Cir.1996) (“[M]ere allegation and speculation do not create a factual dispute for purposes of summary judgment.”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Harris’s motion for appointment of counsel because he failed to establish exceptional circumstances. *See Agyeman v. Corr. Corp. of Am.,*390 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir.2004) (setting forth standard of review and requirements for appointment of counsel).

Harris’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

We do not consider Harris’s arguments raised for the first time on appeal. *See Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.2



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Innkeepers USA Trust (the Company) for the period ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Bulger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, :



| | (1) | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification shall only be deemed to cover the financial statements of
Innkeepers USA Trust, and shall not be deemed to cover any financial statements (or other information) included in the Report with respect to Innkeepers Hospitality.



Date: March 9, 2004



/s/ David BulgerExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer