alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Loan
      Agreement





Party
      A:
      Harbin Renhuang Pharmaceuticals Inc.


Party
      B:
      Heilongjiang Yuejintiande B uilding
      and Installation Project Co.,Ltd




Due
        to
        the demand of Party B in an important investment in Daqing city, and
        b ased
        on
        the friendly consultation of parties A and B, both parties have entered into
        the
        Loan Agreement as follows:




1.
        Due to
        the demand of Party B in Teaching
        and Research Comprehensive Building in Heilongjiang August First Land
        Reclamation University bidding project, Party A agrees to lend Party B RMB ¥9,000,000
        as thesecurity
        in bidding only. No loan is allowed to divert for other
        uses.
  2.
          Both
          parties agree that the period of this agreement is ONE month. Party A must
          pay
          Party B the loan in the agreement signing day.




3.
        The
        interest rate respect to the loan shall be six and eight percent (6.8%).
        In the
        event of failure by Party B to pay any payments due under the Loan after
        10 days
        of loan period (One month), Party B pay one in a thousand(1 ‰ )
        interest per day.
 
 4.
        This
        Agreement will be valid upon signing and cease automatically after Party
        B duly
        repays Party A.
 
 5.
        All
        disputes arising form or in connection with this contract shall be submitted
        to
        Harbin Arbitration Commission for arbitration in accordance with its rules
        of
        arbitration in effect at the time of applying for arbitration.
 
 Party
        A:
        Harbin Renhuang Pharmaceuticals Inc.
 Corporate
        representative:
 
 Party
        B:
        Heilongjiang Yuejintiande Building and Installation Project Co.,Ltd
 Corporate
        representative:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS  I, N. Scott Gillis, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) of First SunAmerica Life Insurance Company,
certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of First SunAmerica Life
Insurance Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting.Date: March 29, 2004
/s/ N. Scott Gillis

N. Scott Gillis
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,142
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         456,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,839
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 439,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        212,030
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         23
<COMMON>                                            72
<OTHER-SE>                                     179,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   439,141
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,634
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,923
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (954)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,969
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34



</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the amended Registration Statements (Forms S-3 No.333-71452-01 and 333-113977-01) and (Forms S-4 No. 333-60355-01 and 333-136801-01) of AIMCOProperties, L.P. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated February 26, 2007 withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of AIMCO Properties, L.P., AIMCOProperties, L.P. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of AIMCO Properties,L.P., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP         Denver, Colorado
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4336-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-4336-DR), dated September 10, 2017, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued September 26, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

      ( print page 46816)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 10, 2017.

The municipalities of Dorado, Fajardo, and Toa Baja for Individual Assistance.

The municipalities of Cataño, Luquillo, and Vega Baja for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance).

The municipalities of Dorado, Guarabo, and Naguabo for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-21628 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
JWN-Q3.2014-EX 10.2






Exhibit 10.2


AMENDMENT 2014-5
NORDSTROM 401(k) PLAN & PROFIT SHARING
(2014 Restatement)


The Nordstrom 401(k) Plan & Profit Sharing (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows, pursuant to Plan Sections 15.2 and 15.5-12, for good faith compliance with the requirements of IRS Rev. Rul. 2013-17 and IRS Notice 2014-19 and shall be interpreted and construed consistent with such intent.


1.    Each occurrence of the term “spouse” shall be replaced with “Spouse”, wherever such term appears.
2.    New Section 2.30 (“Spouse”) is added to the Plan as follows, in good faith reliance on the requirements of IRS Rev. Rul. 2013-17 (“Rev. Rul. 2013-17”) and IRS Notice 2014-19 (“Notice 2014-19”), effective as required by Rev. Rul. 2013-17 and Notice 2014-19, to reflect the legal decision rendered in United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. ___, 133 S.Ct. 2675 (2013) concerning the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-199) as amended (“DOMA”):


“2.30    “Spouse” shall, on and after June 26, 2013, mean an individual to whom a Participant is lawfully married under state law, and shall be defined consistent with Rev. Rul. 2013-17 and Notice 2014-19, under which the terms “Spouse,” “husband and wife,” “husband,” and “wife” include an individual married to another individual of the same sex if the individuals are lawfully married under state law, and the term “marriage” includes such a marriage between individuals of the same sex, provided that the marriage was validly entered into in a state whose laws authorize the marriage of two individuals of the same sex even if the married couple is domiciled in a state that does not recognize the validity of same-sex marriages. Previously, the term “Spouse” had the meaning set forth in DOMA, which prohibited the recognition of same-sex spouses for purposes of Federal law, including the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”) and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and which meaning was held unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in a decision rendered on June 26, 2013.”
*    *    *    *    *
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, pursuant to proper authority, this Amendment 2014-5 has been executed on behalf of the Company this ________ day of November, 2014.


NORDSTROM, INC.








By:_____________________                            
Kathleen Way
Title:    Vice President Benefits



081500.0005/6103874.2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 16, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60795 Summary Calendar

CYNTHIA RENTERIA, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A71 515 500

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Cynthia Renteria, a native and citizen of Mexico, has petitioned for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. In rejecting Renteria’s applications, the IJ determined that Renteria had failed to prove that she was due relief on any authorized ground. The BIA affirmed the IJ’s decision, finding that Renteria had failed to meet her burden of proving entitlement to asylum or withholding of removal. We review theNo. 04-60795 -2- BIA’s legal conclusions de novo and findings of fact for substantial evidence. Lopez-Gomez v. Ashcroft , 263 F.3d 442, 444 (5th Cir. 2001). While in an abusive relationship, Renteria sought assistance for domestic violence at only one police department in the entire country and was dissatisfied with the results. It cannot be said that one police department’s failure to resolve Renteria’s complaint to her satisfaction constitutes past persecution by the Mexican government. Nor can Renteria prove a well-founded fear of future persecution. “To establish a well-founded fear of future persecution, an alien must demonstrate a subjective fear of persecution, and that fear must be objectively reasonable.” Zhao v. Gonzales , 404 F.3d 295, 307 (5th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Even assuming that Renteria had a subjective fear of persecution, she cannot show that her fear was objectively reasonable. Renteria failed to fully explore the possibility that she could find sufficient protection from the domestic abuse in her native country. In addition, Renteria has not demonstrated a sincere effort to relocate in her native country. Accordingly, Renteria has not established that her fear of future persecution is objectively reasonable and her asylum claim fails. See Zhao , 404 F.3d at 307.No. 04-60795 -3- Because Renteria has not met the requirements necessary to obtain asylum, she also cannot meet the more onerous standards required to obtain withholding of removal and her claim for withholding of removal also fails. The BIA’s decision denying Renteria asylum and withholding of removal are supported by substantial evidence. See Efe v. Ashcroft , 293 F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, Renteria’s petition for review is DENIED. Her request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.
Exhibit 8.1

List of Principal Subsidiaries



|                                   |  |              |  |           
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------ |  | ----------
|Subsidiaries                       |  | Jurisdiction |  | Short Name
|Central Costanera S.A.             |  | Argentina    |  | Costanera 
|Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. |  | Chile        |  | San Isidro
|Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A.   |  | Chile        |  | Celta     
|Edegel S.A.A.                      |  | Peru         |  | Edegel    
|Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.                 |  | Colombia     |  | Emgesa    
|Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.   |  | Chile        |  | Pehuenche 
|GasAtacama S.A                     |  | Chile        |  | GasAtacama
|Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.      |  | Argentina    |  | El Chocón
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of Diversified
Futures Trust I (the Fund), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer                                       
|Kenneth A. Shewer Chief Executive Officer
September 16, 2005
Exhibit 21

BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

COMPANY

STATE OF
INCORPORATIONBMCA Acquisition Inc.

DelawareBMCA Acquisition Sub Inc.

DelawareBMCA Gainesville LLC

DelawareBMCA Quakertown Inc.

DelawareBMCA Insulation Products Inc.

DelawareBuilding Materials Investment Corporation

DelawareBuilding Materials Manufacturing Corporation

DelawareHBP Acquisition LLC

DelawareGAF Leatherback Corp.

DelawareGAF Materials Corporation (Canada)

DelawareGAF Premium Products Inc.

DelawareWind Gap Real Property Acquisition Corp

DelawareGAF Real Properties, Inc.

DelawareGAFTECH Corporation

DelawareLL Building Products Inc.

DelawareDuctwork Manufacturing Corporation

DelawarePequannock Valley Claim Service Company, Inc.

DelawareSouth Ponca Realty Corp.

Delaware


---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 23.3


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the: (1) Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (No. 33-36847) relating to the Foundation Health Corporation Profit
Sharing and 401(k) Plan; (2) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-36850)
relating to the Foundation Health Corporation 1990 Stock Option Plan; (3)
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-36849) relating to the Foundation
Health Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan; (4) Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 33-44783) relating to the Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan of
Foundation Health Corporation; (5) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
33-48561) relating to the 1992 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan of Foundation
Health Corporation and the Foundation Health Corporation Incentive Common Stock
Option Agreements; (6) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-53468)
relating to the Century Medicorp 1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan and Century
Medicorp 1985, 1988, 1989 and 1991 nonstatutory stock option plans; (7)
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-67062) relating to the 1989 Stock
Plan of Business Insurance Corporation; and (8) Registration Statement on Form
S-3 (No. 33-80512) relating to the 1993 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan of
Foundation Health Corporation; (9) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
33-86568) relating to the Intergroup Healthcare Corporation Stock Option and
Incentive Plan and Stock Option Agreement; (10) Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (No. 33-86566) relating to the Foundation Health Corporation 1990 Stock
Option Plan (as amended and restated), of our report dated April 27, 1994,
appearing in this Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Foundation Health
Corporation for the year ended June 30, 1996.



STEVENSON, JONES & HOLMAAS, P.C.

Tucson, Arizona
January 10, 1997


                                     65
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

508 

KA 10-00313 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

MICHAEL D. BAILEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

DAVISON LAW OFFICE PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARY P. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (HEATHER A. PARKER

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J.

Doran, J.), rendered November 19, 2009. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated, as a

class D felony (two counts) and aggravated unlicensed operation of a

motor vehicle in the first degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court