alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i at e f orpubl i c at i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AN AY E L I Y G AL VA N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74704 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 177- 080 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A naye l i y G al van, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f M exi co, pet i t i on s pro se for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her app ea lfr om an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h e rap p lic atio n f o rc an c e llatio n o f

r e m o v a l. We h av e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U. S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . We r e v i e w d e n o v o qu e s t i o n s o f l aw, 

# FI LED SEP 23 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 74704 2 Kha n v. H

older , 584 F . 3d 773, 776 ( 9th C i r . 2009) , and w e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v ie w . T he B I A pr ope r l yc onc l ude d thatG a l van i s s t atut or i l yi ne l i gi bl e f or cancel l at i on of re m ov albecause s he w as conv i ct ed of tw o cri m es i nv ol vi ng m oral tu rp itu d e . See 8 U . S . C . § 1229b( b) ( 1) ( C ) ( an a l i e n i s i ne l i gi bl e f orc anc e l l at i on of re m ov ali f c on vi ct ed of an offense un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 18 2(a) (2)) . G al van’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are no tpers uasi ve. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10725

Summary Calendar

SHIRLEY L. ALDRIDGE,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

JOE KEFFER, Warden, FMC-Carswell,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CV-78

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Shirley L. Aldridge, federal prisoner # 17829-045, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition challenging her incarceration resulting from her conviction for five

counts of aiding and abetting the filing of false income tax returns. The district

court dismissed Aldridge’s § 2241 petition, and this court dismissed Aldridge’s

appeal from the dismissal of her § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction because

Aldridge did not file a timely notice of appeal. Aldridge v. Keffer, No. 10-10725,

slip op. at 1-2 (5th Cir. Oct. 6, 2010) (unpublished).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 8, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-10725 Document: 00511439475 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/08/2011
No. 10-10725

After dismissing Aldridge’s § 2241 petition, the district court denied

Aldridge a certificate of appealability (COA). Aldridge now appeals the district

court’s order denying her a COA.

Aldridge argues that the district court erred by dismissing her § 2241

petition and denying her post-judgment motions. She does not, however, raise

any challenges to the district court’s order denying her a COA. As this court has

already dismissed Aldridge’s appeal from the dismissal of her § 2241 motion, the

only matter presently before us is her appeal from the district court’s order

denying her a COA. By failing to raise any challenge to the district court’s order

denying her a COA, Aldridge has waived the only issue before this court. See

Hughes v. Johnson, 191 F.3d 607, 613 (5th Cir. 1999). Furthermore, as a COA

is not required to appeal the denial of a § 2241 petition and Aldridge’s appeal

from the dismissal of her § 2241 petition has already been dismissed, any

possible error in the district court’s COA order would be harmless. See Ojo v.

INS, 106 F.3d 680, 681 (5th Cir. 1997).

Aldridge’s appeal is without arguable merit. Accordingly, it is dismissed

as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2; Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.

1983).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

2

Case: 10-10725 Document: 00511439475 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/08/2011
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of SRS Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Janet M. Biski, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofmy knowledge:

 
| 3.     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                  |
| 4.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the  Company. |

 

 
| Date: November 14, 2003 |   |                     |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                    | By:    | /s/ Janet M.  Biski      |
|                    |   | Janet M. Biski           |
|                    |   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of AIMCO Properties, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Paul J. McAuliffe, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Paul J. McAuliffePaul J. McAuliffeExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(equivalent of the chief financial officer of AIMCO Properties, L.P.)March 14, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 21, 2016

p1214 

# Order

Clerk December 21, 2016

153976

ALBERT KOSIS,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153976

COA: 326211

Wayne CC: 13

- 015060

- NO

CITY OF LIVONIA,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligroup, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alok Bajpai, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

| (1)    | The Report fully complies   with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | The information contained   in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial   condition and results of operations of the Company.                                       |

| DATE:  August 7,   2007 | By:    | /s/ Alok Bajpai         |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                              |   |                         |
|                              |   | Alok Bajpai             |
|                              |   | Chief Financial Officer |
#### In the Matter of Antonia Mykala P., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Antonio P., Appellant; The Children’s Aid Society, Respondent.

[859 NYS2d 155]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sara P. Schechter, J.), entered February 6, 2007, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent father’s parental rights with respect to the subject child and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The agency developed a realistic plan tailored to the father’s needs, which included the goal of ultimately reuniting with the child, all of which satisfied its obligation to make diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship *(see Matter of Jonathan M.,*19 AD3d 197 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 798 [2005]). The fact-finding determination of permanent neglect was supported by clear and convincing evidence that the father did not realistically plan for the child’s future in accordance with Social Services Law § 384-b (7) (a) *(Matter of Galeann F.,*11 AD3d 255 [2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 703 [2005]). The child *225has extraordinary medical needs, which the father has shown himself unable to address adequately. Termination of parental rights, in order to facilitate the adoption process, is in the best interests of the child, and is supported by the requisite preponderance of the evidence *(see Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136, 147-148 [1984]). Concur—Andrias, J.P, Gonzalez, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.1

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Lightwave, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Green, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
{section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to {section} 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        By:   /s/ JAMES GREEN
                                              James Green
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              President
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)

                                              Date:  August 14, 2002
<PAGE>

 
 
Exhibit 11.1

               Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc. and Subsidiaries
                         Computation of Per Share Loss
                   (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION>
                                                                                             Thirteen             Twenty-six   
                                                                                               Weeks                 Weeks     
                                                                                               Ended                 Ended     
                                                                                           August 2, 1997        August 2, 1997
                                                                                           --------------        --------------
<S>                                                                                        <C>                   <C>           
Weighted average number of issued shares outstanding                                             8,928                 8,279

Effect of:
     1996 Stock Option Plan                                                                        102                   102
     Melville Warrant to purchase common stock                                                   1,269                 1,269
                                                                                           -----------           -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding                                                             10,299                 9,650
                                                                                           ===========           ===========

Net loss                                                                                   $   (12,581)          $   (19,844)
                                                                                           ===========           ===========

Net loss per common share                                                                  $     (1.22)          $     (2.06)
                                                                                           ===========           ===========
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         October 4, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 29, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 365 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2017-213, CP2017-321.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-21335 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANTTO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SRS Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), Ulrich Gottschling, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to hisknowledge:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: May 3, 2007 |                     |                    |
|-------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|
|              | By:                      | /s/  Ulrich Gottschling |
|              | Ulrich  Gottschling      |
|              | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ATRIA COMMUNITIES,
INC.'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          16,081
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      695
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (144)
<INVENTORY>                                        136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,609
<PP&E>                                         226,088
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (30,051)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,940
<BONDS>                                        102,993
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,647
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,719
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,199
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    20
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,030
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,057
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (199)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,858
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,260
<INVENTORY>                                     62,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,857
<PP&E>                                          66,334
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 282,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,499
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,749
<OTHER-SE>                                     122,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   282,847
<SALES>                                        214,980
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               214,980
<CGS>                                          128,810
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                95,923
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,519)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,224)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,295)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,295)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.29)


</TABLE>