alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46495-46496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21423]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee (MSHRAC)

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institute 
for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), announces the following 
meeting for the Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee 
(MSHRAC). This meeting is open to the public, limited only by the 
limited only by the space available. The meeting room accommodates 
approximately 50 people. If you wish to attend in person or by phone, 
please contact Marie Chovanec by email at [email protected] or by phone 
at least 5 business days in advance of the meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on November 15, 2017, 8:00 a.m.-3:00 
p.m., Mountain Time.

ADDRESSES: Sheraton Denver West Hotel, 360 Union Boulevard, Lakewood, 
CO 80228 or call 412-386-5302.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey H. Welsh, Designated Federal 
Officer, MSHRAC, NIOSH, CDC, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 
15236, telephone 412-386-4040, fax 412-386-6614.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose: This committee is charged with providing advice to the 
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services; the Director, CDC; 
and the Director, NIOSH, on priorities in mine safety and health 
research, including grants and contracts for such research, 30 U.S.C. 
812(b)(2), Section 102(b)(2).
    Matters To Be Considered: The meeting will focus on mining safety 
and health research projects and outcomes, including built-in-place 
refuge alternatives, explosion protection, domestic and international

[[Page 46496]]

collaborations, fatigue management systems, mitigating dynamic failure 
in western underground coal mines, mining strategic planning, and 
mining innovations research initiative. Agenda items are subject to 
change as priorities dictate.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2017-21423 Filed 10-4-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FOURTH QUARTER OF FISCAL 1998 CONTAINED
IN THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-24-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-24-1998
<CASH>                                       2,931,376
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,491,693
<ALLOWANCES>                                   400,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,166,420
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,720,171
<PP&E>                                       3,820,558
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,370,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,332,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,748,132
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       397,524
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,487,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,332,112
<SALES>                                     10,192,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,138,485
<CGS>                                        7,801,958
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,751,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,498,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               245,419
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             207,354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,053,249
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,250,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,803,249
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,803,249
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0118

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TERENCE R. PASSMORE,

Defendant and Appellant.

FILED

MAR 0 5 2021

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Appellant has filed a motion for a 90-day extension of time to file his reply brief in

the referenced matter.

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extension is GRANTED. Appellant has until

June 7, 2021, within which to file his reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

DATED this 5 —day of March, 2021.

For the Court,

Chief Justice

03/05/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0118
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                                   SECTION 906
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of National
Processing, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge,
that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 8, 2003                          /s/ David E. Fountain
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Name: David E. Fountain
                                               Title: Senior Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIDIA ARAICA-GRANADOS, a.k.a.

Josefa Miriam Araica-Granados,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73227

Agency No. A072-867-794

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 24, 2011** 

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Lidia Araica-Granados, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen and to reconsider. We

dismiss the petition for review.

FILED

JUN 08 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-73227

Araica-Granados contends that she is prima facie eligible for a waiver under

8 U.S.C. § 1182(i) because her removal would cause extreme hardship to her

United States citizen spouse. We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of

discretionary relief under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i). See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i);

Nath v. Gonzales, 467 F.3d 1185, 1188 (9th Cir. 2006). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
(December 10, 1997)

#### In the Matter of Michael A. Feit, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[666 NYS2d 740]

Per Curiam.

By decision dated May 18, 1995, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of one year, effective June 19, 1995 *{Matter of Feit,*215 AD2d 937). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application *701indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with section 806.9 (22 NYCRR 806.9) of this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers and has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (22 NYCRR 806.12) regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it does not oppose the application. Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
**Exhibit 21**

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING CORPORATION

 
| **Subsidiaries**                                  | ** ** | **Jurisdiction  of   Incorporation** |
|---------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                              |       |                                 |
| Canterbury Park  Concessions, Inc.           |       | Minnesota                            |
| Shakopee Valley RV Park  Acquisition Company, LLC |       | Minnesota                            |

 

The subsidiariesare 100%-owned directly by Canterbury Park Holding Corporation.  The financial statements of such subsidiariesare included in the Consolidated Financial Statements of Canterbury ParkHolding Corporation.

 

----
#### Roberto TEJEDA-MUNGIA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-74549.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 9, 2008.*

Filed June 17, 2008.

Deniz S. Arik, Stender & Pope, PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner.

Lance L. Jolley, David V. Bernal, Anthony C. Payne, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, District Counsel, Office of the District Chief Counsel, Phoenix, AZ, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: REINHARDT, BERZON and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*639MEMORANDUM**

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner Roberto Tejeda-Mungia’s motion to reopen proceedings.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reopen because the motion to reopen was untimely and did not meet any of the regulatory exceptions. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), (3); *Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS,*282 F.3d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir.2002).

Moreover, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary decision to decline to exercise its *sua sponte*authority to reopen petitioner’s case. *See Ekimian v. INS,*303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2002).

Accordingly, respondent’s motion for dismissal, in part, and summary disposition, in part, is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED, in part; DISMISSED, in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


                          [LETTERHEAD OF ELLIOTT DAVIS]

                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 pertaining to the 1987 Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Stock Option Plan
and the 2001 Stock Option Plan of Union Financial Bancshares, Inc. and in the
Registration on Form S-3 (No. 333-35319) pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment
Plan of Union Financial Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated November 1, 2001,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Union Financial
Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
of Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2001.


                                                /s/ Elliott Davis LLP


December 19, 2001
Greenville, South Carolina
**Exhibit 10.18**
**SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION**
     Effective May 2005, members of our board of directors who are not employees of MitchamIndustries, Inc. receive the following compensation:
 •  $25,000 per year, plus an additional $50,000 for the Non-Executive Chairman of theBoard  •  $5,000 per year for each member of the Audit Committee, plus an additional $3,000per year for the chairperson of the Audit Committee;  •  $2,000 per year for each member of the Compensation Committee, plus an additional$2,000 per year for the chairperson of the Compensation Committee;  •  reimbursement for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connectionwith their attendance at board and committee meetings; and  •  at the discretion of our full Board of Directors, discretionary grants of stockoptions or restricted stock, or any combination thereof, under our stock option plans.
SCWC

- 18

- 0000 5 0 6

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I, Respondent / Plaintiff

- Appell ant ,

vs.

ANDREW HINESLEY , Petitioner / Defendant

- Appell ee

.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 18

- 0000 5 0 6 ; CASE NO. 1 CPC 1 7 00 01383 )

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson , and Eddins , J J.)

Petitioner/ Defendant

- Appell ee ’s Application for Writ

of Certiorari filed on November 11 , 202 1 , is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, December 22, 2021

.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-18-0000506 22-DEC-2021 07:52 AM Dkt. 4 ODAC
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 20, 2014

t0617 

# Order

Clerk June 20, 2014

149270

JOHN KRUSAC, Personal Representati ve of the

ESTATE OF DOROTHY KRUSAC,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149270

COA: 321719

Saginaw CC: 12

- 015433

- NH

COVENANT MEDICAL CENTER, INC., d/b/a

COVENANT MEDICAL CENTER

- HARRISON,

d/b/a COVENANT HEALTHCARE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2014 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include

among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether Harrison v Munson Healthcare, Inc., 304

Mich App 1 (2014), erred in its analysis of the scope of the peer review privilege, MCL

333.21515; and (2) whether the Saginaw Circuit Court erred when it ordered the

defendant to produce the first page of the impro vement report based on its conclusion that

“objective facts gathered contemporaneously with an event do not fall within the

definition of peer review privilege.”

We further ORDER that the stay entered by this Court on May 14, 2014 shall

remain in effect u ntil completion of this appeal.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and six
months ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
  /s/ Dean J. DouglasDean J. DouglasPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ruben Ibarra SALAZAR, also known as Rogelio Barragan-Ibarra, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-41010.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 19, 2008.

Stevan Buys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*345Denise S. Benson, Assistant Federal Public Defender Federal Defender’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ruben Ibarra Salazar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Salazar has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET - UNAUDITED AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          34,891
<SECURITIES>                                    37,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (831)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,531
<PP&E>                                          15,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,393)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,714
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,791
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,885
<CGS>                                            9,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,208
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,196
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,012
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECITON 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Theundersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of AmeriVest Properties Inc., aMaryland real estate investment trust (the “Issuer”), hereby certifies that theAnnual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) of the Issuer forthe year ended December 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78 m(a)) and thatthe information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer
|        | By:    | /s/ CHARLES K. KNIGHT      |
|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|   |   | Charles K. Knight          |
|   |   | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

March 16, 2006

----
#### HUMPHREYS HOMEOPATHIC MEDICINE CO. v. HILTON.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

January 23, 1895.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Henry F. Homes, for appellant.

Wise & Lichtenstein, for appellee.

Discontinued by consent.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350,  chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of ITEX Corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify
with  respect to the annual  report of the Company on Form  10-KSB/A-1  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) the annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information  contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Lewis "Spike" Humer,
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)