alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  FOUNDED ON PAGES 1-3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-QSB,  FOR THE  YEAR-TO-DATE  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                  0001016151
<NAME>                            AMPLIDYNE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1
<CURRENCY>                                    USD
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1
<CASH>                                  1,116,320
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                             482,589
<ALLOWANCES>                               86,000
<INVENTORY>                               781,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        2,305,227
<PP&E>                                    649,211
<DEPRECIATION>                            370,667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          2,639,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     609,278
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                      568
<OTHER-SE>                              2,001,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            2,639,720
<SALES>                                   655,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          721,146
<CGS>                                     534,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             666,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          342,397
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         12,444
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (299,910)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (299,910)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                             (299,910)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.05)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1

906 CERTIFICATION

The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or
Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Valter Moro, the Chief Executive Officer and Ramiro Alfonsín B., the Chief Financial Officer of Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.
(Endesa Chile), each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Endesa Chile.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29, 2016.



/s/ Valter MoroName: Valter MoroChief Executive Officer/s/ Ramiro Alfonsín B.Name: Ramiro Alfonsín B.Chief Financial Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2794 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit prepayment penalties, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2009 

Ms. FUDGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit prepayment 

penalties, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Mortgage 

5 Responsibility Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PREPAYMENT PENALTIES. 

7 The Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) 

8 is amended by inserting after section 129A the following 

9 new section: 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2794 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 129B. PROHIBITION ON PREPAYMENT PENALTIES. 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—No prepayment fees or penalties 

3 may be charged or collected under the terms of any con4 sumer credit transaction secured by an owner-occupied 

5 principal dwelling of the consumer. 

6 ‘‘(b) UNENFORCEABLE.—Any prepayment penalty in 

7 violation of subsection (a) shall be unenforceable.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of SRS Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ulrich Gottschling,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to his knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

| Date: May 8, 2008 |   |                     |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                   |   | By:                      | /s/  Ulrich Gottschling |
|                   |   | Ulrich  Gottschling      |
|                   |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2768 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2768

 To declare nuclear energy to be clean energy, for purposes of Federal 
                                  law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2009

   Mr. Wamp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To declare nuclear energy to be clean energy, for purposes of Federal 
                                  law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DECLARATION.

    For purposes of Federal law, nuclear energy is hereby declared to 
be clean energy, and any provision of Federal law relating to clean 
energy shall be considered to include nuclear energy.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 21.1.1**

**Subsidiariesof the Registrant**
| **Subsidiary**                      | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **State of Incorporation** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------|------------|------------|------------|--------------------------------------|------------|
|                                |       |       |       |
| TESSCO Incorporated                 |       | Delaware   |       |
| Wireless Solutions Inc.             |       | Maryland   |       |
| TESSCO Service  Solutions, Inc.     |       | Delaware   |       |
| TESSCO de Mexico S.A.  de C.V.      |       | Mexico     |       |
| TESSCO Communications  Incorporated |       | Delaware   |       |
| TESSCO Financial  Corporation       |       | Delaware   |       |
| TESSCO Business  Services LLC       |       | Delaware   |       |
| TESSCO Supply Chain  Services, LLC  |       | Delaware   |       |
| TESSCO Product  Solutions, LLC      |       | Delaware   |       |
| TESSCO Integrated  Solutions, LP    |       | Delaware   |       |
| GW Services Solutions, Inc.         |       | Delaware   |       |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                      As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
                         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter
ended December 31, 2006 of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Dina L. Masi, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Integrated BioPharma, Inc. certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
         78o(d)); and

(2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
         material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: February 14, 2007          By: /s/ Dina L. Masi
                                 ---------------------
                                 Dina L. Masi,
                                 Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Renhuang Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending October 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Shaoming Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the
Report:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




/s/Shaoming
      LiShaoming
      LiChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
                  (Principle
      Executive Officer)




Dated:
December 8, 2009
#### In the Matter of Gustan G., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[860 NYS2d 127]

*514In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (McLeod, J.), dated April 12, 2007, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated February 26, 2007, made upon the appellant’s admission, finding that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of assault in the second degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court has broad discretion in entering dispositional orders *(see Matter of Melissa B.,*49 AD3d 536 [2008]; *Matter of Donnell W.,*36 AD3d 926 [2007]; *Matter of Rudolph S.,*13 AD3d 459, 460 [2004]). Here, based upon, inter alia, the serious nature of the crime, the recommendations by Mental Health Services and the Department of Probation, the appellant’s poor academic performance, and his history of truancy, the Family Court properly found that the “least restrictive [dispositional] alternative” was to place the appellant in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months *(see*Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]; *Matter of Tirell R.,*33 AD3d 804, 805-806 [2006]; *Matter of Jamel H.,*262 AD2d 643, 643-644 [1999]; *Matter of Juan M.,*254 AD2d 359, 360 [1998]). Rivera, J.P, Spolzino, Dickerson and Eng, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-4347

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

FRED JIMMY CONDREY, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior

District Judge. (2:09-cr-00322-PMD-1)

Submitted: October 27, 2011 Decided: November 7, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

O. Grady Query, Paul N. Uricchio, Charleston, South Carolina, 

for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, E. 

Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Fred Jimmy Condrey, Jr., appeals from the district 

court’s 240-month sentence following his guilty plea to one 

count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, 

in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2006), and one count of 

possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and 

marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Condrey 

challenges his sentence as unreasonable, arguing that the 18 

U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006) factors warranted a significantly lower 

sentence and that the district court erred in considering

Condrey’s prior statements in calculating the drug weight 

attributable to him. The Government filed a responsive brief 

arguing that, because Condrey waived his right to appeal his

sentence, this court should dismiss Condrey’s appeal. In his 

reply brief, Condrey argued that his waiver was not valid. 

Concluding that Condrey validly waived his right to appeal his 

sentence, and that the issues raised are within the scope of the 

waiver, we dismiss his appeal.

A defendant may waive the right to appeal if that 

waiver is knowing and intelligent. United States v. Poindexter, 

492 F.3d 263, 270 (4th Cir. 2007). The question of whether a 

defendant validly waived his right to appeal is a question of 

law that we review de novo. United States v. Blick, 408 F.3d 

162, 168 (4th Cir. 2005). We look to the totality of the 
3

circumstances to determine whether a particular waiver is 

knowing and intelligent. United States v. Manigan

We therefore dismiss Condrey’s appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

, 592 F.3d 

621, 627 (4th Cir. 2010). Our review of the record leads us to 

conclude that Condrey did knowingly and voluntarily waive the 

right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Both of the issues 

raised in Condrey’s brief fall within the scope of the waiver. 

DISMISSED
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-20-00285-CV

__________________

ABEL VILLARREAL, Appellant

V.

KENDAL NICOLE VILLARREAL, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 418th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 19-10-14652-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 5, 2021, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed 

unless the appellant remitted the filing fee for the appeal. Appellant did not respond.

Previously, the trial court found that appellant is not entitled to proceed 

without payment of costs. On February 22, 2021, this Court entered an order, in 

which we concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding that 

appellant failed to demonstrate his burden under Rule 145 and that appellant is able 

to afford payment in installments. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(f), (g); Tex. R. App. P. 
2

20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for 

the appeal, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Submitted on June 9, 2021

Opinion Delivered June 10, 2021

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Alabama National BanCorporation listed below of our
report dated March 14, 2005 relating to the financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.



Registration Statements on Form S-8:



|           |  |            |  |           
|---------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------
|333-07951  |  | 333-27285  |  | 333-47748 
|333-59364  |  | 333-70205  |  | 333-76301 
|333-76303  |  | 333-76305  |  | 333-76309 
|333-76313  |  | 333-76315  |  | 333-76317 
|333-102234 |  | 333-106314 |  | 333-106315
|333-111318 |  | 333-111319 |  | 333-113248
|333-113249 |  | 333-111323 |  | 333-111324
|333-114994 |  | 333-118806 |  |           



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

---



Birmingham,
Alabama

March 15, 2005
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MARCOS CARDONA, JR., 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D23-790 

LT Case No. 2015-101347-CFDL 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed July 25, 2023

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Volusia County, 

James R. Clayton, Judge. 

Marcos Cardona, Jr., Lake Butler, 

pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, JAY and PRATT, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the amended Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-71452-01)
and (Form S-4 No. 333-60355-01) of AIMCO Properties, L.P. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated February 12, 2004, except for
Note 22, as to which the date is February 24, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of AIMCO Properties, L.P. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Denver,
Colorado
March 8, 2004

---

QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Great Lakes Power Inc.(the
Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald
Tremblay, Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|    |  |                                                                   |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Donald Tremblay                                               |  | 
|    |  |                                                                   |  | 
|    |  | Donald Tremblay
Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|    |  |                                                                   |  | 
|    |  | May 20, 2003                                                      |  | 

Page 4
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Kevin Steve Thornton v. Chelsea Westfall

Appellate case number: 01-19-00898-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-72510

Trial court: 280th District Court of Harris County

The record was due on December 23, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1. The clerk’s record 

was filed on January 3, 2020, but the court reporter advised the Court that no payment 

arrangements had been made for the filing of the reporter’s record. The Court sent a notice to 

appellant that, unless the reporter’s record was filed or appellant responded with proof of payment 

arrangements for the reporter’s record by January 27, 2020, the Court might require appellant to 

file his brief without the benefit of the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). On February 

3, 2020, appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file the appellant’s brief seeking 60 days 

so that appellant could raise the funds to pay for documents necessary to draft the brief.

The Court grants the extension. Appellant’s brief, prepared with or without the benefit of 

the reporter’s record, is due 60 days from the date of this order. If no reporter’s record is filed, 

the Court will consider and decide the issues that do not require a reporter’s record for decision. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ______/s/ Peter Kelly_____

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___February 6, 2020_____
#### Daniel SHERMAN, petitioner, v. William LaMOTHE, et al.

No. 10-482.

Dec. 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.