alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Majestic Star Casino,
LLC and The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp. (collectively, the "Registrant")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Don H.
Barden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Jon S.
Bennett, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act OF 2002, that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant.

Dated: November 15, 2004

/s/ Don H. Barden
-----------------------
Don H. Barden
Manager, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
The Majestic Star Casino, LLC and
The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.

/s/ Jon S. Bennett
-----------------------
Jon S. Bennett
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
The Majestic Star Casino, LLC and
The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.
NOTE MODIFICATION AGREEMENT


 


This Note Modification
Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into on _____ September, 2017 by and between Precision Opinion, Inc. (“Precision”)
and Michael France (“France”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHERAS, Precision executed and delivered to
France a promissory note dated October 20, 2016 in the principal amount of $800,000.00, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit
“A” and incorporated herein by reference (“Promissory Note”); and,


 


WHEREAS, the Promissory Note provided for a
maturity date of October 19, 2017.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual
covenants and agreements herein contained, Precision and France agree as follows:


 


	 	1.	The principal amount as of the date of this Agreement owed on the Promissory Note is $800,000.00.
	 	2.	The maturity date of the Promissory Note is modified to provide that the entire principal amount outstanding shall be due and payable in full on December 31, 2019.
	 	3.	In all other respects, the Promissory Note remains in full force and effect as originally signed.


 


	Precision Opinion, Inc.	 	Michael France
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	James T. Medick	 	Michael France
	President
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1


                        MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC.

                         SUBSIDIARIES AND PARTNERSHIPS

                               DECEMBER 31, 1996



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Place of
                                     Incorporation                                          Ownership
     Subsidiary/Partnership           or Domicile                 Owner                     Percentage
-----------------------------------     --------       ----------------------------------   ----------
<S>                                     <C>            <C>                                     <C>
Marine Drilling Management Company      Delaware       Marine Drilling Companies, Inc.         100%

Marine Drilling International, Inc.     Delaware       Marine Drilling Management Company      100%

Keyes Holding Corporation(1)            Delaware       Marine Drilling Companies, Inc.         100%
</TABLE>





(1)  Effective February 1, 1997, the name was changed to Marine 300 Series,
     Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,667
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,737
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     38,327
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        109,055
<ALLOWANCE>                                        701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 161,026
<DEPOSITS>                                     105,363
<SHORT-TERM>                                    20,889
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,849
<LONG-TERM>                                     18,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 161,026
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,342
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,573
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,915
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,858
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,139
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,776
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        6
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  (4)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,571
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       961
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.90
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,064
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   852
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      192
<RECOVERIES>                                        35
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  701
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
[951 NYS2d 311]

#### River York Stratford, LLC, Appellant, v Estelle Linderman et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

July 16, 2012

*8APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, LLP,*New York City *(Joseph Burden*of counsel), for appellant. *Davis & Gilbert LLP,*New York City *(Michael Lasky*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order, entered February 4, 2011, reversed, with $10 costs, motion denied and petition reinstated.

Respondents’ pre-answer motion to dismiss this September 2010 nonprimary residence holdover proceeding should have been denied. “The meaning and coverage of a general release depends on the controversy being settled and upon the purpose for which the release was actually given ... A release may not be read to cover matters which the parties did not desire or intend to dispose of’ *(Lefrak SBN Assoc. v Kennedy Galleries,*203 AD2d 256, 257 [1994], citing *Cahill v Regan,*5 NY2d 292, 299 [1959]). Here, the release in question was part of a stipulation, so ordered on May 14, 2009, which resolved an attorneys’ fee dispute arising from an earlier (2001) nonprimary residence proceeding and related agency proceedings involving these same parties. The stipulation included a provision (paragraph 7) releasing each side from “any and all claims . . . relating to [the respondent tenants’] occupancy of the Apartment through the date of this Stipulation.”

Considering the narrow scope of the “controversy being settled” *(Lefrak,*203 AD2d at 257) and accepting as true the petitioner landlord’s sworn allegations as to the intended reach of the settlement *(see Enock v National Westminster Bankcorp,*226 AD2d 235 [1996]), respondents failed to establish that the release was intended to bar prosecution of the within nonprimary residence eviction claim, which, notably, did not become actionable until, at the earliest, June 1, 2010 (or more than a year after execution of the settlement agreement), at the end of the so-called “window period” prior to the expiration of the respondents tenants’ most recent renewal lease *(see 615 Co. v Mikeska,*75 NY2d 987 [1990]). In reinstating the holdover petition, we express no view as to the potential impact, if any, of the release provisions on the temporal scope of petitioner’s trial evidence.

Torres, J.E, Shulman and Hunter, Jr., JJ., concur.
In th e S u p re m e Co u rt o f Ge o rg ia

De c id e d: Ma y 2 3 , 2 0 1 6

S 1 6 Y1 2 8 0 . IN THE MATTER OF TIF F INI COLETTE BELL.

P ER CURIAM.

Th is d isc ip lin a ry m a tte r is b e fo re th e Co urt o n th e pe titio n fo r v o lu n ta ry

d isc ip lin e file d b y Tiffin i Co le tte Be ll (S ta te B a r N o

. 6 7 6 9 7 1 ), p rio r t o t h e

issu a nc e o f a fo rm a l c o m

p la in t, se e B a r Ru le 4-2 2 7 (b ) (2 ). In h e r p e titio n , Be ll,

w h o b e c a m e a m e m

b e r o f th e B a r in 2 00 6

, se e k s th e im p o sitio n o f a p u b lic

re p rim a n d

, a

n d a d m its th a t, in th e re p re se nta tio n o f a c lie n t in a c h ild c u sto d y

m a tte r, sh e v io l a t e d Ru le s 1 .3

, 1 .4

, a n d 8 .4 (a ) (4 ) b y fa ilin g to tru th fu lly

c o m m u nic a te w ith h e r c lie n t re g ard in g d isc o v e ry an d a p p o in tm e n t o f a g u a rd ia n

a d lite m , fa ilin g to tim e ly re sp o n d to disc ov e ry , fa ilin g to se e k a p p o in tm e n t o f

a g u a rd ia n a d lite m , a n d fa ilin g to th o ro u g h ly p re p a re fo r c e rta in h e a rin g s. Th e

m a x im um sa n c tio n fo r a v io la tio n of Ru le s 1 .3 a n d 8 .4 (a ) (4 ) is d isb a rm e n t, a n d

th e m a x im

u m sa nc tio n fo r a v io la tio n of 1 .4 is a p u blic re p rim a n d. Be ll a lso

a d m its th a t sh e re c e iv e d a c on fid e n tia l re p rim a n d b y th e In v e stig a tiv e P a n e l o n

No v e m be r 2 0

, 2 0 1 5

. In m i t i g a t i o n , Be ll sta te s, a n d th e Sta te Ba r d o e s n o td isa g re e , th a t sh e la c k e d a se lfish m o tiv e , th a t sh e sin c e re ly re g re ts h e r c o n d u c t,

a n d th a t sh e h a s sh own a

c o o p e ra tiv e a ttitu d e in th e d isc ip lin a ry p ro c e e d in g s.

Ha v in g re v ie we d th e p e titio n a nd th e S ta te B a r’s re sp o n se , we c o n c lu d e

th a t a p u b lic re p rim a nd is th e a p p ro p ria te sa n c tio n in th is c a se , a n d we th e re fo re

a c c e p t th e p e titio n fo r v o lu n ta ry d isc ip lin e

. Ac c o rd in g ly

, th e Co u rt h e re b y

o rd e rs th a t Be ll re c e iv e a p u b lic re p rim a nd in a c c o rd a n c e with Ba r Ru le s 4 -1 0 2

(b ) (3 ) a n d 4 -2 2 0 (c ) fo r h e r a d m itte d v io l a t i o n s o f R u le s 1

. 3

, 1 .4

, a n d 8 .4 (a )

(4 ).

P e titio n fo r v o lu n ta ry d isc ip l i n e a c c e p te d

. P u b lic re p rim a n d

. All th e

Ju stic e s c o n c ur.

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Baez, Appellant.

[859 NYS2d 375]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Honorof, J.), rendered April 5, 2001, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

By withdrawing all motions, pending and undecided, the defendant waived his right to seek appellate review of the suppression ruling (see *People v Jones,*288 AD2d 322 [2001]; *People v Capone,*229 AD2d 445, 446 [1996]; *People v Gary,*179 AD2d 821, 822 [1992]). Furthermore, considering the totality of the evidence at the suppression hearing, the law, and the circumstances of the case, the withdrawal of the motions did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 711 [1998]).

The defendant’s contention that the sentencing court improperly considered certain information when imposing sentence is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273, 281 [1992]; *People v Butler,*10 AD3d 368 [2004]) and, in any event, is without merit *(see People v Hansen,*99 NY2d 339, 345-346 [2003]; *People v Olds,*24 AD3d 571 [2005]). Moreover, the defendant’s contention that the court improperly failed to conduct a hearing to determine the amount of restitution is also unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Passalacqua,*43 AD3d 964 [2007]; *People v Allen,*305 AD2d 421 [2003]) and, in any event, is without merit *(see People v Charles,*309 AD2d 873, 874 [2003]; *People v Stubbs,*281 AD2d 498, 499 [2001]). Prudenti, PJ., Skelos, Covello and Balkin, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 11**                                                   **2003** **2004**  **Three Months Ended** **Nine Months Ended** **Three Months Ended** **Nine Months Ended**  **September 30,** **September 30,** **September 30,** **September 30,**  **Net**     **Per Share** **Net**     **Per Share** **Net**     **Per Share** **Net**     **Per Share**  **Loss** **Shares** **Amount** **Loss** **Shares** **Amount** **Income** **Shares** **Amount** **Income** **Shares** **Amount**  **(In thousands, except per share data)**  **(In thousands, except per share data)**   ** ** ** **Basic EPS                                                Net income (loss) available to commonshareholders $(1,025)  21,002  $(0.05) $(7,162)  20,977  $(0.34) $1,221   24,411  $0.05  $981   24,392  $0.04                                                  Effect of Dilutive SecuritiesStock option plans      —           —           577           978                                                      Dilutive EPS                                                Net income (loss) available to commonshareholders and assumed conversions $(1,025)  21,002  $(0.05) $(7,162)  20,977  $(0.34) $1,221   24,988  $0.05  $981   25,370  $0.04                                                  
NOTE: Options to purchase 4.5 million shares of Class A Common Stock wereoutstanding during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003,respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings pershare because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. Options to purchase3.3 million and 2.3 million shares of Class A Common Stock were outstandingduring the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively, butwere not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because theeffect would have been anti-dilutive.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Written Certification of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, C. Thomas Faulders, III, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LCC International,
Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ C. Thomas Faulders, III
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1996 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,617
<SECURITIES>                                    13,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                       313
<INVENTORY>                                        134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,584
<PP&E>                                           2,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,467
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,245
<SALES>                                         24,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,411
<CGS>                                           13,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,022
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,634
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (26,122)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (26,122)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26,122)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (4.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.32)
        

</TABLE>
##### 






EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Dial Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Herbert M. Baum,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Herbert M. BaumHerbert M. Baum
Chief Executive Officer
May 8, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Dial Corporation and will be retained by The Dial Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








---



##### 






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Dial Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Conrad A. Conrad,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

/s/  Conrad A. Conrad
Conrad A. Conrad
Chief Financial Officer
May 8, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Dial Corporation and will be retained by The Dial Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Mitcham Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as to the late filing; and  (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerMay 28, 2004