alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter G. Michielutti, Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ PETER G. MICHIELUTTI   **Peter G. Michielutti,** **Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,** **Chief Operating Officer**
Date: June 7, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (#1171).                

*Date and Time:*

November 2, 2017; 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

November 3, 2017; 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Room W2210/W2220, Alexandria, VA 22314.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Person:*                     Dr. Deborah Olster, Office of the Assistant Director, Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-8700.                

*Summary of Minutes:*                     Posted on SBE advisory committee Web site at:                     *https://www.nsf.gov/​sbe/​advisory.jsp.*

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation on major goals and policies pertaining to Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate (SBE) programs and activities.                

## Agenda

    - SBE Directorate and Division Updates
    - Graduate Training in the Behavioral and Social Sciences
    - Social Science Surveys
    - SBE Strategic Planning/Grand Challenges
    - Science Communications
    - Meeting with NSF Leadership
    - Evidence-Based Policymaking
    - Future Meetings, Assignments and Concluding Remarks

Dated: October 3, 2017.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-21553 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
     GOLDEN BEAR GOLF, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED 
     MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         8,267,702
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,066,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                   540,806
<INVENTORY>                                    2,357,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               23,064,686
<PP&E>                                         23,514,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,869,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 52,422,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,642,627
<BONDS>                                        8,122,621
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       55,050
<OTHER-SE>                                     36,602,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   52,422,703
<SALES>                                        1,270,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,820,579
<CGS>                                          1,582,142
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,754,917
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,595,655
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             176,576
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,511,152)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (908,510)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,602,642)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,602,642)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
May 22 , 201 2



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.
, A CHILD

NO. 14

- 11

- 00 281

- CV

____________________
This cause, an appeal from the “ FINAL ORDER UNDER UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT,” signed November 5 , 20 10 , was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in portion of the order requiring “ RETROACTIVE CHILD SUPPORT” to the extent the trial court found
that the retroactive child support sh ould be ordered “as of April 30, 2009” . We therefore
REFORM th at portion of the order to change the language “as of April 30, 2009” to “as of October 25, 20 10

. ”

We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED except as modified in this judgment.

We order appell ant to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this
decision certified below for observance.
### Interim Decision 44435

Mew= OP REM

. In Visa Petition Proceedings

NYO-N-15M Decided by Regional Commissioner Janicary 12,1965

Beneficiaries, who are entertainers, comedian ventriloquist and acrobatic dancer, are ineligible for classification under section 101(a) (15) (H) (I), Immigration and Nationality Act, as aliens of distinguished merit and ability since the -evidence does not establish that they have played starring or leading roles or have been prominently featured by name as entertainers, or that they have been acknowledged as eminent by recognized critics or other experts in the field of entertainment.



### • This matter is before the Regional Commissioner on an appeal from the decision of the District Director denying the petition to accord the beneficiaries nonimmigrant status under section 101(a) (15) (H) (i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

### The petitioner is a theatrical agent and producer who seeks to import the beneficiaries temporarily for bookings through his office as entertainers. The beneficiaries are natives and citizens of France. Their address is given as Montreal, Canada. The male alien, aged 52, is described, as an "international comedian ventriloquist (the man with the speaking hand)". His wife assists him and is also a ballet dancer. To qualify for classification under this section of the law, these entertainers must be persons of distinguished merit and ability, 

### and further, must be coming to the United States to perform services requiring such merit and ability. The evidence submitted as to the personal qualifications of the

• beneficiaries consists of (1) Publicity release of Bob Bellamy and Company, vocal impressionist, ventriloquist, gags and comedy. (2) Publicity release of Betty Gromer, "acrobatic dancer in Spanish style, the only artist in Europe performing somersaults while playing castanets; ,, (3) Photographs, and

65

### Interim Decision #1435
(4) Clippings from unnamed and undated publications showing appearances of the couple as entertainers at cafes, restaurants, a music hall, hotels, and civic celebrations. 

### These documents do not establish that the beneficiaries have played starring or leading roles, that they have been prominently featured by name as entertainers, nor that they have 

### been acknowledged aseminent by recognized critics or other experts in the field of entertainment. It is concluded that the petitioner has failed to establish that the beneficiaries are eligible for classification under section 101(a) (15) (H) (1) as persons of distinguished merit and ability. It 

### is unnecessary, therefore, to consider whether the engagements obtained or to be obtained by the petitioner in 

### their behalf require persons of such merit and ability. The appeal must be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

66
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3197 

AN ACT 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 

in Spokane, Washington, as the ‘‘Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3197 EH

1 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 MEDICAL CENTER, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON. 

3 The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 

4 in Spokane, Washington, shall after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Mann6 Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Cen7 ter’’. Any reference to such medical center in any law, reg8 ulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the 

9 United States shall be considered to be a reference to the 

10 Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

11 Center. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 20, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3197 

AN ACT 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medfairs Medical Center’’. ‘‘Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans Af- ical center in Spokane, Washington, as the
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT HENRY JOHNSON, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 179 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 of Closure Medical Corporation (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Benny Ward, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. (s) 78m(a) or (s) 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ BENNY WARD                                       
|Benny Ward                                           
|Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|May 10, 2005
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 7, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130185 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 130185 COA: 256194 Wayne CC: 03-011884-01 CHARLES EDGAR GREGORY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 1, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to app eal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for
the reasons set forth in the di ssenting opinion, and REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to consider whether defendant is entitled to jail credit.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would deny leave to appeal.

d0404 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 7, 2006

Clerk
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 10, 2019

NO. 03-19-00418-CV

Touch Tell, Inc., Appellant

v.

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas; and 

Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on May 21, 2019. Appellant 

Touch Tell, Inc. filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the 

motion, the Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the 

motion and dismisses the appeal. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this 

Court and in the court below.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7896

SHERMAN LEON JONES, Petitioner - Appellant,

versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-03-448-2) Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 19, 2005 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sherman Leon Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Sherman Leon Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for relief from judgment filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); seeReid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 370 (4th Cir. 2004) (holding the certificate of appealability requirement applies to appeals of denials of motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) in habeas proceedings). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Jones’ notice of appeal and informal brief on appeal as an application to file a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). See United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 124 S. Ct. 496 (2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a- 3 - successive § 2254 petition, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence sufficient to establish that no reasonable fact finder would have found the movant guilty. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(C) (2000). Jones’ claims do not satisfy either of these conditions. Therefore, we decline to authorize a successive § 2254 petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Michael A. Pugh, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Mitcham Industries, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting./s/ MICHAEL A. PUGH Michael A. Pugh
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT 6/30/97
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001016275
<NAME> GEO PETROLEUM, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                        $394,921
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 $655,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                  $267,280
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $1,318,154
<PP&E>                                      $6,112,354
<DEPRECIATION>                            $(1,162,538)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $6,267,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $796,713
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    $6,797,191
<OTHER-SE>                                $(1,325,935)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                $6,267,969
<SALES>                                       $173,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $342,213
<CGS>                                         $229,170
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $381,871
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $16,730
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              $(56,389)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 $(56,389)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $(0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(0.01)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32


Certification of


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


under Section 906 of the


Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carriage Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012, a s amended (the “Report”), Melvin C. Payne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and L. William Heiligbrodt, Executive Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:


(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated: April 5, 2013


/s/ Melvin C. PayneMelvin C. PayneChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer





/s/ L. William HeiligbrodtL. William HeiligbrodtVice Chairman of the Board, Executive Vice President,Secretary and Director (Principal Financial Officer)