alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.2





           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS



     As   independent   petroleum   consultants,   we  hereby   consent  to  the
incorporation  of our  Reports  included  in this  Form  10-K  into  Snyder  Oil
Corporation's  Registration  Statements  Nos.  33-34446,   33-45213,   33-54809,
33-64219, and 33-09877.

                                        NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, Inc.


                                        BY /s/ Clarence M. Netherland
                                          ----------------------------
                                          Clarence M. Netherland
                                          President

Dallas, Texas
February 27, 1998
`[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 46653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21720]



[[Page 46651]]

Vol. 82

Thursday,

No. 192

October 5, 2017

Part IV





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Proclamation 9651--Honoring the Victims of the Tragedy in Las Vegas, 
Nevada
 
 
                         Presidential Documents 
 
 

  Federal Register / Vol. 82 , No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / 
Presidential Documents  

 ___________________________________________________________________

 Title 3--
 The President

[[Page 46653]]

                Proclamation 9651 of October 2, 2017

                
Honoring the Victims of the Tragedy in Las Vegas, 
                Nevada

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                Our Nation is heartbroken. We mourn with all whose 
                loved ones were murdered and injured in last night's 
                horrible tragedy in Las Vegas, Nevada. As we grieve, we 
                pray that God may provide comfort and relief to all 
                those suffering.

                As a mark of respect for the victims of the senseless 
                act of violence perpetrated on October 1, 2017, by the 
                authority vested in me as President of the United 
                States by the Constitution and the laws of the United 
                States of America, I hereby order that the flag of the 
                United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White 
                House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all 
                military posts and naval stations, and on all naval 
                vessels of the Federal Government in the District of 
                Columbia and throughout the United States and its 
                Territories and possessions until sunset, October 6, 
                2017. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at 
                half-staff for the same length of time at all United 
                States embassies, legations, consular offices, and 
                other facilities abroad, including all military 
                facilities and naval vessels and stations.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                second day of October, in the year of our Lord two 
                thousand seventeen, and of the Independence of the 
                United States of America the two hundred and forty-
                second.
                
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

[FR Doc. 2017-21720
Filed 10-4-17; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3295-F7-P`
| 1)   | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Dated:        August 7, 2009 |  By:  | /s/ Gary S. Wechsler                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                                                       |            | Gary S. Wechsler                      |
|                                                                       |            | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                                                       |            |                                  |
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2675 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2009 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend title II of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and Reform Act of 2004 to extend the operation 

of such title for a 1-year period ending June 22, 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

HR 2675 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Antitrust Criminal 

3 Penalty Enhancement and Reform Act of 2004 Extension 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DELAY OF SUNSET. 

6 Section 211(a) of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty En7 hancement and Reform Act of 2004 (15 U.S.C. 1 note) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘5 years’’ and inserting ‘‘6 years’’. 

9 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT. 

10 The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect 

11 immediately before June 22, 2009. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 21, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No s

. 3D23

- 435 & 3D23

- 1378

Lower Tribunal No. 21

- 23418

________________



### Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company

, Appellant,

vs.



### Jimaca Investments, LLC

,

Appellee.

Appea ls from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, William

Thomas , Judge.

Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., and Paulo R. Lima and Elizabeth K.

Russo , for appellant.

Cassel & Cassel, P.A., and Michael A. Cassel (Hollywood) , for

appellee.

Before LINDSEY, MILLER and LOBREE , JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2802 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2802

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for an extension of the legislative authority of the Adams 
Memorial Foundation to establish a commemorative work in honor of former 
      President John Adams and his legacy, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY FOR MEMORIAL 
ESTABLISHMENT.
    (a) Legislative Authority.--Section 1(c) of Public Law 107-62 is 
amended by striking ``accordance with'' and all that follows through 
the period at the end and inserting the following: ``accordance with 
chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, except that any reference 
in section 8903(e) of that chapter to the expiration at the end of or 
extension beyond a seven-year period shall be considered to be a 
reference to an expiration on or extension beyond December 2, 2013.''.
    (b) Technical Amendments.--Public Law 107-62 is amended--
        (1) in section 1(e), by striking ``(40 U.S.C. 1001, et seq.)'' 
    and inserting ``(40 U.S.C. 8901 et seq.)''; and
        (2) in section 2, by striking ``(40 U.S.C. 1002)'' and 
    inserting ``(40 U.S.C. 8902(a))''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2644 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2644

 To waive the 35-mile rule to permit recognition of Gadsden Community 
   Hospital as a critical access hospital under the Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2009

   Mr. Boyd introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To waive the 35-mile rule to permit recognition of Gadsden Community 
   Hospital as a critical access hospital under the Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF 35-MILE RULE TO PERMIT RECOGNITION OF GADSDEN 
              COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AS A CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL UNDER 
              THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    Gadsden Community Hospital operated by Gadsden Hospital, Inc. in 
Quincy, Florida, is deemed to meet the requirement of section 
1820(c)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i-
4(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)) for purposes of obtaining designation as a critical 
access hospital under the Medicare program.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                              5                               
<MULTIPLIER>                           1
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                        11,535,146 
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                    877,856
<ALLOWANCES>                     270,000
<INVENTORY>                       20,092
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              13,269,750
<PP&E>                        47,556,527                        
<DEPRECIATION>                 5,462,144
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               138,205,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          8,502,215
<BONDS>                      117,607,015
<COMMON>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                    12,096,633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 138,205,863
<SALES>                       47,414,788
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              47,414,788
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 43,336,221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               1,710,245  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 270,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             5,634,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (3,266,061)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (3,266,061) 
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                  (3,266,061)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0  
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                    Patent and Trademark Office
                                    ASSISTANT SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER OF
                                    PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
                                    Washington, D.C. 20231

ROGER L. FIDLER                                 COPY MAILED
400 GROVE STREET                                      Paper No. 31
                                                AUG. 12, 1997

GLEN ROCK, NJ 07452                             OFFICE OF PETITIONS
                                                A/C PATENTS


In re Patent No. 4,624,264          :
Issue Date: November 25, 1986       :
Application No. 06/330,501          : DECISION GRANTING PETITION
Filed: December 14, 1981            :
Attorney Docket No. JWB785PCIP      :


This is a decision on the petition, filed December 2, 1996 and supplemented on
June 13, 1997 and June 19, 1997, to accept the delayed payment of a maintenance
fee under 37 CFR 1.378(b) for the above-identified patent.


The petition is granted.


In light of the showing of record, it is concluded that the delay was
unavoidable since reasonable care was taken to ensure that the maintenance fee
would be timely paid.


Accordingly, the maintenance fee in this case is hereby accepted and the
above-identified patent is hereby reinstated as of the mail date of this
decision.


This patent file is being returned to the Files Repository.

Telephone inquiries relevant to this decision should be directed to Special
Projects Examiner David Redding at (703) 308-6713.

Abraham Hershkovitz 
Director, office of Petitions 
Office of the Deputy Assistant Commissioner 
for Patent Policy and Projects
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20533 Conference Calendar

STAN HUNT, of himself as an individual and on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GARY JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JANIE COCKRELL, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CV-3443

-------------------- February 19, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Stan Hunt, Texas prisoner number 363715, has filed this interlocutory appeal to challenge the district court’s denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case. Hunt first argues that the district court erred by declining to hold a hearing prior to denying his motion and by giving insufficient factual findings and legal conclusions in its order denying Hunt’s motion. Hunt has not shown reversible errorNo. 02-20533 -2- in connection with either of these issues, as there is no dispute concerning the basic facts underlying the case, and the district court’s order denying the motion is sufficient to permit us to review it. See Kaepa v. Achilles Corp. , 76 F.3d 624, 628 (5th Cir. 1996); see also F ED . R. C IV . P. 52(a). Hunt also argues that the district court erred in relying on Hay v. Waldron , 834 F.2d 481, 484 (5th Cir. 1987), in its order denying his motion. Because this case gives the standard for analyzing whether a preliminary injunction should issue, the district court did not err in relying upon it. Finally, Hunt contends that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion because he has made a satisfactory showing as to all of the required factors. Hunt has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion, as he has not shown that he has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of his suit. See Lakedreams v. Taylor , 932 F.2d 1103, 1107 (5th Cir. 1991). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES
 PercentageSubsidiary
    
    Incorporated In
    
    OwnedMedicis, The Dermatology Company®
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Dermavest, Inc.
    
    Nevada
    
    
    100
    %Medicis Manufacturing Corporation
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %GenDerm Corporation
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Medicis Canada Ltd.
    
    Canada
    
    
    100
    %Ucyclyd Pharma, Inc.
    
    Maryland
    
    
    100
    %Medicis Pediatrics, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Medicis Aesthetics Holdings Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Medicis Aesthetics Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Dermavest Swedish Holdings AB
    
    Sweden
    
    
    100
    %HA North American Sales AB
    
    Sweden
    
    
    100
    %Medicis Aesthetics Canada Ltd.
    
    Canada
    
    
    100
    %Masterpiece Acquisition Corporation
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

The Board of DirectorsAmeriVest Properties Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the registration statements (No. 333-112210, No. 333-101713, and No.333-44210) on Form S-3 and in the registration statements (No. 333-101803 andNo. 333-101802) on Form S-8 of AmeriVest Properties Inc. of our report datedFebruary 20, 2004, except as to note 5, which is as of March 16, 2004, withrespect to the consolidated balance sheets of AmeriVest Properties Inc. as ofDecember 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended,which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-KSB ofAmeriVest Properties Inc.

 

 

**KPMG LLP**

 

 

Denver, ColoradoMarch 16, 2004

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maico Lopez-Jimenez, Appellant.

[860 NYS2d 521]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Lorenzo, J, at plea; Efrain Advarado, J, at sentence), rendered on or about January 2, 2007, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant *385may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Andrias, Williams and DeGrasse, JJ.
---

Exhibit 15

CONSENT OF EXPERT February 23, 2012 British Columbia Securities CommissionAlberta Securities CommissionSaskatchewan Financial Services CommissionManitoba Securities CommissionOntario Securities CommissionNew Brunswick Securities CommissionNova Scotia Securities CommissionRegistrar of Securities, Prince Edward IslandSecurities Commission of Newfoundland and LabradorRegistrar of Securities, Northwest TerritoriesRegistrar of Securities, NunavutRegistrar of Securities, YukonUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Re:

   Annual Information Form dated February 23, 2012 (the “Annual Information Form”) of Minefinders Corporation Inc. (the “Company”).
  I refer to the report entitled "Technical Report, La Bolsa Project, Pre-feasibility Study” dated January 10, 2011 (the "Report") as referenced in the Annual Information Form and documents incorporated by reference therein. I hereby consent to the use of my name and the Report in the Annual Information Form and in documents incorporated by reference therein. I confirm that I have read the Annual Information Form and I have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations that are derived from the Report referred to above or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services I performed in connection with such Report. I consent to the filing of this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Company’s Form 40-F dated February 23, 2012, and any amendment thereto, and to the incorporation by reference of this consent into the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-170839).


---

- 2 - Yours truly, Per:

   /s/J. Rafael Sanchez CamposJ. Rafael Sanchez CamposFebruary 23, 2012


---
GLD
- 028 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11

- 3557

___________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. TINA FAKE, Appellant

____________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District C ourt for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (M.D. Pa. Crim. No. 1

- 05

- cr - 00426) District Judge: Hon. William W. Caldwell

____________________________________ Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Summary Action Purs uant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 October 27, 2011 Before: FUENTES, GREENAWAY, JR. and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : November 17, 2011 )

_________ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM
Tina Fake was sentenced to 136 months of imprisonment after she pleaded guilty in April 2006 to one count of “health care fraud resulting in serious bodily injury” and one count of criminal forfeiture. Instead of taking a direct appeal, Fake filed a collateral2

attack motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The District Court denied the motion on May 8, 2008, and we denied Fake‟s request for a certificate of appealability. See United States v.
Fake , C.A. No. 08

- 2789 (3d Cir. Dec. 5, 2008). On July 22, 2011, Fake filed a self

- styled application for a “writ of error coram vobis.” Fake contended in that application that she was “‟denied‟ her 5th , 6th, [and] 14th Amendment[ rights], where the prosecution set forth „materially false facts‟ by a deliberate deception of the courts by the presentation of kn own false evidence which is incompatible with rudimentary demands of justice.” By order entered August 25, 2011, the District Court denied Fake‟s application. The District Court found it to be “nothing more than a second 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion,
but unde r a different name.” The District Court explained to Fake that if she “wishes to file a successive § 2255 motion, she must seek leave to do so from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.” Fake filed a notice of appeal. 1 We will summarily affirm the Distri ct Court‟s August 25, 2011 order because this appeal fails to present a substantial question. See Murray v. Bledsoe , 650 F.3d 246, 247 (3d Cir. 2011) (per curiam). Fake‟s application for a writ of error coram vobis was an impermissible successive collate ral attack, and the District Court appropriately rejected it
as such. See Robinson v. Johnson , 313 F.3d 128, 139

- 40 (3d Cir. 2002). We note for Fake‟s benefit that the presumptive means by which a federal prisoner can challenge the validity of her convi ction or sentence is a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Okereke v. United States , 307 F.3d 117, 120 (3d Cir. 2002). In order to file

1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.3

a second or successive § 2255 motion, Fake must apply for permission directly from this Court and meet the gateke eping standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h).