alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT NO. 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

<PAGE>

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 pertaining to the 1987 Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Stock Option Plan
and the 2001 Stock Option Plan of Union Financial Bancshares, Inc. and in the
Registration on Form S-3 (No. 333-35319) pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment
Plan of Union Financial Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated October 21, 2002,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Union Financial
Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2002.


                                                    /s/ Elliott Davis LLC

December 3, 2002
Greenville, South Carolina
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Erodes Gibson, Appellant.

[859 NYS2d 821]

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered March 20, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by reducing the period of postrelease supervision to a period of one year and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.31). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court erred in failing to advise him of his right to a hearing concerning his alleged violations of the plea agreement prior to imposing an enhanced sentence *(see generally People v Perkins,*291 AD2d 925 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 654 [2002]; *People v Perry,*252 AD2d 990 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 929 [1998]) and, in any event, that contention is without merit. At the time of the plea, the court conditioned the sentence upon, inter alia, defendant’s appearance for sentencing, and defendant subsequently failed to appear for sentencing. We thus conclude that defendant was not entitled to a hearing before the court enhanced his sentence, based upon defendant’s failure to appear for sentencing *(see People v Figgins,*87 NY2d 840 [1995]). To the extent that the further contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel survives the plea and his waiver of the right to appeal *(see People v Santos,*37 AD3d 1141 [2007], *lv denied*8 NY3d 950 [2007]), we conclude that it lacks merit *(see generally People v Ford,*86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]).

Finally, we conclude that the sentence is illegal insofar as it includes a two-year period of postrelease supervision *(see*Penal Law § 70.45 [2]). “ ‘Although [that] issue was not raised before the [sentencing] court or on appeal, we cannot allow an [illegal] *1228sentence to stand’ ” *(People v Davis,*37 AD3d 1179, 1180 [2007], *lv denied*8 NY3d 983 [2007]). We therefore modify the judgment by reducing the period of postrelease supervision to a period of one year *(see People v Ehrhardt,*292 AD2d 790 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 675 [2002]). The sentence as modified is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Smith, Green and Gorski, JJ.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors

American Fidelity Assurance Company and

Contract Owners

 American Fidelity Separate Account B:


We consent to the use of our report dated February 27, 2018 for the segregated subaccounts of American Fidelity Separate Account B included herein and to the reference to our firm under the heading "Custodian and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Statement of Additional Information on Form N‐4.


/s/KPMG, LLP


Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

 April 27, 2018
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41267

Conference Calendar

 

JOHNNIE R. PROPES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY MANAGER; RODNEY NOLES,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CV-162-RAS-DDB

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Johnnie R. Propes, Texas state prisoner # 1178904, appeals

the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his pro se, in

forma pauperis, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint as

frivolous and for failure to state a claim. Propes alleged that

Plano, Texas, city officials conspired to discriminate against

him on the basis of his race by issuing citations to him for

violating city ordinances based on the mistaken belief that he

owned land which he, in fact, did not own. He claimed that

Noles, an uncertified building inspector, had engaged in the
No. 04-41267

-2-

wanton prosecution of code violations on residences owned by

African-Americans.

We review a dismissal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for an abuse of discretion. Taylor v.

Johnson, 257 F.3d 470, 472 (5th Cir. 2001). We review a

dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted de novo. Hart v. Hairston, 343 F.3d 762, 763-64 (5th

Cir. 2003); § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 

Propes’s conclusory allegations of a race-based conspiracy

are insufficient to support a viable § 1983 claim. See Brinkmann

v. Johnston, 793 F.2d 111, 113 (5th Cir. 1986). Nor has Propes

demonstrated that either the citations or the warrants issued for

his arrest were motivated by discriminatory animus. See Coleman

v. Houston Indep. Sch. Dist., 113 F.3d 528, 533 (5th Cir. 1997). 

Accordingly, Propes’s appeal lacks an arguable basis in law and

fact and is frivolous. See Berry v. Brady, 192 F.3d 504, 507

(5th Cir. 1999). Because the appeal is frivolous it is

dismissed. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

In Propes v. Dretke, No. 04-50822 (5th Cir. Apr. 20, 2005),

we imposed the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) bar against Propes. We warn

Propes that further filing of frivolous complaints or pleadings

may result in additional sanctions against him. 

Propes’s motion for the appointment of counsel on appeal is

denied. 

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; MOTION DENIED; SANCTION

WARNING ISSUED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3386-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of South Carolina (FEMA-3386-EM), dated September 7, 2017, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued September 29, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective September 13, 2017.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-21634 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 32.3

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The  undersigned  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership III-C ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 16th day of April, 2007.

                                GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP III-C
                                ("Issuer")

                                //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                -----------------------------------
                                Dennis R. Neill
                                President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                -----------------------------------
                                Craig D. Loseke
                                Chief Accounting Officer
                                (Chief Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3004 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 378
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3004

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2011

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             April 25, 2012

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 260 California Drive in Yountville, California, as the ``Private 
         First Class Alejandro R. Ruiz Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS ALEJANDRO R. RUIZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 260 California Drive in Yountville, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Private First Class Alejandro R. Ruiz 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
First Class Alejandro R. Ruiz Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 378

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3004

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 260 California Drive in Yountville, California, as the ``Private 
         First Class Alejandro R. Ruiz Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 25, 2012

                       Reported without amendment
```
# gZ,3S3-02_

TERRY LEE PIASECKI TDCJ# 1717778 McCONNELL UNIT 3001 S. EMILY DR. BEEVILLE, TEXAS 78102
ABEL ACOSTA CLERK, COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS P.O. BOX 12308 CAPITOL STATION AUSTIN/ TEXAS 78711 RE: TRIAL COURT NO- 11-03-02382-CR(1)
Dear Mr. Acosta: 

### I recently received a white card fromyour office stating that myapplica tion for writ of habeas corpus has been denied on the findings of the trial court. I would like some clarification..).ion -this, issue. I filed several sup 

### plements with my 11.07 writ of habeas corpus, so I amwondering if the denial is based on the supplements or on the writ itself. Thank you, 

# p/g^~~£jB&(IzaGacA^-

Uf# FEB21115 AtJ@fAeos!§,Cf©rk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, November 2, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-4110.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be held Thursday, November 2, 2017, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-4110, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Room 1509, National Office, Washington, DC 20224, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The committee will be discussing various issues related to Taxpayer Communications and public input is welcome.

Dated: October 1, 2017.

Susan Jimerson,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2017-21480 Filed 10-4-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of China Titanium and Chemical Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michel Bourbonnais, President and Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  April 13, 2005

By: /s/ Michel Bourbonnais

Name: Michel Bourbonnais

Title:   President. Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer
#### In the Matter of Miguel Perez, Appellant, v Philip Coombe, as Acting Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 81]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of possession of heroin and smuggling. The record does not support the contention of petitioner that he was denied his right to call witnesses on his behalf *(see,*7 NYCRR 254.5 [a]). The record establishes that the Hearing Officer conducted an extended hearing in order to give petitioner the opportunity to identify and question witnesses. The Hearing Officer called every individual who was identified as a witness to relevant events *(see, Matter of Nieves v Coughlin,*157 AD2d 943) and thereafter conducted the hearing without a further request by petitioner for additional witnesses. Petitioner thus failed to establish the existence of any additional relevant information *(see, Matter of Cowart v Pico,*213 AD2d 853, 855, *lv denied*85 NY2d 812). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Wyo*1076ming County, Dadd, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000926283
<NAME> JAMES CABLE FINANCE CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,342,420
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,384,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,141
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,879,499
<PP&E>                                      94,495,637
<DEPRECIATION>                              70,686,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,799,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,982,260
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (58,182,816)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,799,444
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,371,831
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,289,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               510,539
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,158,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,586,191)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,586,191)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             15,885,685
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,299,494
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

             Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings


Basic

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   Year Ended September 30,
                                                                          2000           1999             1998
<S>                                                                   <C>             <C>            <C>
Weighted average outstanding shares............................           908,020         903,460         931,195
Net income (loss)..............................................       $   961,492     $ 1,299,999    $    634,874
Net income (loss) per common share.............................       $      1.06     $      1.44    $       0.68
</TABLE>



Diluted
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   Year Ended September 30,
                                                                          2000           1999             1998
<S>                                                                   <C>             <C>            <C>
Weighted average outstanding shares............................           908,020         903,460         950,833
Net income (loss)..............................................       $   961,492     $ 1,299,999    $    634,874
Net income (loss) per common share.............................       $      1.06     $      1.44    $       0.67
</TABLE>