alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report of Braintech, Inc. (the Company ) on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward A. White, the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Edward A. White                               
|Edward A. White                                   
|Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer
|Date: March 18, 2008
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2864 

AN ACT 

To amend the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act of 

1998 to authorize funds to acquire hydrographic data 

and provide hydrographic services specific to the Arctic 

for safe navigation, delineating the United States extended continental shelf, and the monitoring and description of coastal changes. 
2 

•HR 2864 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

4 Section 306 of the Hydrographic Services Improve5 ment Act of 1998 (33 U.S.C. 892d) is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting before the text the following: 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 section: 

10 ‘‘(b) ARCTIC PROGRAMS.—Of the amount authorized 

11 for each of fiscal years 2011 and 2012— 

12 ‘‘(1) $5,000,000 is authorized for use to ac13 quire hydrographic data, provide hydrographic serv14 ices, conduct coastal change analyses necessary to 

15 ensure safe navigation, and improve the manage16 ment of coastal change in the Arctic; and 

17 ‘‘(2) $2,000,000 is authorized for use to ac18 quire hydrographic data and provide hydrographic 

19 services in the Arctic necessary to delineate the 

20 United States extended Continental Shelf.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2864 

AN ACT 

To amend the Hydrographic Services Improvement 

coastal changes. shelf, and the monitoring and description of eating the United States extended continental specific to the Arctic for safe navigation, delingraphic data and provide hydrographic services Act of 1998 to authorize funds to acquire hydro-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended  September 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements and Notes, thereto.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           409,856
<SECURITIES>                                   2,150,427
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,503,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                     125,000
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,984,989
<PP&E>                                         1,457,382
<DEPRECIATION>                                   272,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                12,815,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,063,655
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           5,139
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,326,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  12,815,456
<SALES>                                       28,996,485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              28,996,485
<CGS>                                         22,412,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 27,304,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                26,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,834,896
<INCOME-TAX>                                     552,531
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,691,499
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,282,365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .20
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Bell, Appellant.

[665 NYS2d 867]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Covington, J.), rendered November 17, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to consecutive terms of 3 to 9 years and 2 to 6 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

*77Defendant’s challenges to his plea are unpreserved, since the issues raised by defendant were not raised in his motion to withdraw his plea, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice *(see, People v Mackey,*77 NY2d 846). In any event, defendant’s claim that the court was required to accept his initial offer to plead guilty to the top count of one indictment and allow him to proceed to trial on the second indictment is without merit, since the right to plead guilty to an entire indictment without the permission of the court and consent of the People requires a plea to all counts including concurrent counts (CPL 220.10 [21, [3], [4]).

Defendant’s initial denial that he displayed what appeared to be a pistol did not engender “ ‘significant doubt’ ” upon the voluntariness of his plea, particularly given his subsequent admission once the court explained the element *(People v Toxey,*86 NY2d 725, 726).

The nature and extent of the opportunity given defendant to advance his motion to withdraw his plea met the required procedural standard *(see, People v Tinsley,*35 NY2d 926). Furthermore, the minutes of the plea belie defendant’s conclusory claims that he pleaded guilty because he was under stress and confused (see, *People v Cruz,*239 AD2d 159).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Williams and Andidas, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Dial Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Herbert M. Baum,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Herbert M. BaumHerbert M. Baum
Chief Executive Officer
May 7, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Dial Corporation and will be retained by The Dial Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Dial Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Conrad A. Conrad,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

/s/  Conrad A. Conrad
Conrad A. Conrad
Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Dial Corporation and will be retained by The Dial Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bradley J. Dunaway, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 866]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from Judgment of Orleans County Court, Punch, J.—Violation of Probation.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Callahan and Balio, JJ.
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23



Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cecil Bancorp, Inc.
Elkton, Maryland



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-KSB) of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated January 21,
1998, included in the 1997 Annual Report to Stockholders of Cecil Bancorp, Inc.

     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statements (Form 10-KSB Number 0-24926) of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
of our report dated January 21, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements incorporated herein by reference.

                                        Simon Master & Sidlow, P.A.



Wilmington, Delaware
January 21, 1998
#### Joseph Massie, Jr., et al., Appellants, v Commercial Envelope Manufacturing Co., Inc., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[666 NYS2d 504]

—In an action to recover damages for negligence, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated April 3, 1997, as denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff Joseph Massie was hired by the defendant to inspect and possibly replace a blower unit on its premises that was part of its heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning system. The blower unit was located on an interior sheet metal roof. Massie, using his own ladder, gained access to the roof. During the course of his inspection, the roof collapsed and Massie plummeted to a concrete floor. He thereafter commenced this action against the defendant to recover damages arising from negligence. Massie alleged that the roof collapsed, *inter alia,*because it was improperly constructed and supported, and because it was improperly used to store materials and debris. Massie’s wife, the plaintiff Claire Massie, asserted derivative claims. After issue was joined, the plaintiffs moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. In the order appealed from, the Supreme Court, *inter alia,*denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, finding issues of fact. The plaintiffs now appeal.

*552Massie does not allege, and there is no evidence, that the defendant directed or controlled Massie’s work in any manner. Rather, it appears that the defendant relied on Massie’s training and expertise as to the performance of the contracted-for work. Further, there is no evidence that the defects complained of were not and/or could not have been discovered through inquiry or inspection. Thus, Massie’s actions in entering onto the sheet metal roof to inspect the blower unit without, *inter alia,*any apparent inquiry, inspection, or precautions, even though he observed various debris thereon, including car tires and 12 to 15 boxes with unknown contents, raises a question of fact as to his comparative fault warranting denial of summary judgment as to liability *(see, MacDowell v Koehring Basic Constr. Equip.,*49 NY2d 824; *Gibson v American Export Isbrandtsen Lines,*125 AD2d 65; *Rios v Nicoletta,*119 AD2d 562).

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Altman, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge 

Judith Scrase 

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(01 I947A aCCV, 

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric D. Dean, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[858 NYS2d 924]

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F. Kocher, J.), rendered February 20, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same memorandum as in *People v Dean*(52 AD3d 1308 [2008]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P, Lunn, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 128399 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 128399 

 COA: 259724 

Macomb CC: 03-001401-FH 

ROBERT BELL HUNTER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 10, 

2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
---

Exhibit 9




KPMG LLP
     Telephone
     (604)691-3000Chartered Accountants
     Fax
     (604)691-3031PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street
     Internet
     www.kpmg.caVancouver BC V7Y 1K3Canada




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Minefinders Corporation Ltd.

We consent to the inclusion in this this annual report on Form 40-F of:

Our Auditors Report dated February 24, 2011 on the consolidated balance sheets of Minefinders Corporation Ltd. (the Company) as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010;our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 24, 2011 on the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.


We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-138709 and 333-170839) on Form F-10 of the Company of our report dated February 24, 2011 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010 and our report dated February 24, 2011 with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, included herein.

KPMG LLP (signed)
Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada
February 24, 2011

| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity.KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP. | 

---
EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

Earnings per share has been calculated in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128 "Earnings Per Share"
issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. SFAS No. 128 requires
presentation of earnings per share on a basic computation and a diluted
computation. The basic computation divides net income by only the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the year and the diluted
computation gives effect to all diluted common shares that were outstanding
during the year. Earnings and outstanding shares for 1998 and 1997 have been
restated to give effect to the merger with Bryan Bancorp of Georgia, Inc. that
was consummated on December 15, 1998 and accounted for using the pooling of
interests accounting method.

The following data shows the amounts used in computing earnings per share and
the effect on income and the weighted average number of shares in thousands of
dilutive potential common stock.

    Years Ended December 31,
                                                     2001    2000     1999
                                                    ------  ------   ------
      Income available to common shareholders:
      Used in basic earnings per share              $4,398  $4,292   $3,533
                                                    ------  ------   ------
      Used in diluted earnings per share            $4,398  $4,292   $3,533
                                                    ------  ------   ------
      Weighted average number of common
         shares used in basic earnings per share *   2,958   2,974    2,974
      Effect of dilutive securities:
         Stock options *                                53      49       73
                                                    ------  ------   ------
      Weighted average number of common
         and dilutive potential common shares
         used in diluted earnings per share *        3,011   3,023    3,047
                                                    ------  ------   ------

* - 2000 and 1999 restated for a ten percent stock dividend in May 2001.
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 10.14


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE
                  MEDIRISK, INC. 1998 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE MEDIRISK, INC. 1998 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN is
made and executed this 26th day of January, 1999, to be effective as of the date
of approval hereof by the stockholders of Medirisk, Inc. (the "Corporation") at
the 1999 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors the Corporation deems it to be in the best
interests of the Corporation and its stockholders to effect certain amendments
to the Medirisk, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to
Section 15.1 of the Plan, and to submit such amendment to the stockholders of
the Corporation for approval;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Section 15.1 of the Plan, subject to
approval of the Corporation's stockholders at the 1999 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

     1. NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES. Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted
and replaced with a new Section 5.1 which shall read in its entirety as follows:

          5.1. NUMBER OF SHARES. Subject to adjustment as provided in
     Article XIV, the aggregate number of shares of Stock reserved and available
     for Awards or which may be used to provide a basis of measurement for or to
     determine the value of an Award (such as with a Stock Appreciation Right or
     Performance Unit Award) shall be 850,000, of which not more than twenty
     (20%) percent may be granted as Awards of Restricted Stock or unrestricted
     Stock Awards.

     2. EFFECT OF AMENDMENT. As modified hereby, the provisions of the Plan, as
heretofore amended, shall remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment to be duly
executed as of the date first above written.

                                        MEDIRISK, INC.



                                        By: /s/ Barry W. Burt
                                            ---------------------------
                                            BARRY W. BURT
                                            Secretary

                                      S 15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THRIFT MANAGEMENT, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 27, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                         422,406
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  209,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    472,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,105,384
<PP&E>                                       1,729,132
<DEPRECIATION>                                (239,042)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,613,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          407,194
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,500
<COMMON>                                        21,857
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,181,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,613,504
<SALES>                                      4,810,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,810,365
<CGS>                                        3,005,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,005,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,043,963
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (221,602)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (83,389)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (138,213)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.05)


</TABLE>