alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.01**I, Patrick J. Clawson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K for CyberGuard Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: September 1, 2005     /S/ Patrick J. Clawson         Patrick J. Clawson    Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.111(a)

                        TERMINATION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT



     This Termination and Release  Agreement made this ____ day of May, 2000, by
and  between  Play Co.  Toys &  Entertainment  Corp.  ("Play  Co."),  a Delaware
corporation,  having its principal place of business at 550 Rancheros Drive, San
Marcos,  California 92069 and ZD Group, LLC ("ZD"), a New York Limited Liability
Company,  having an address at 1385  Broadway,  Suite  814,  New York,  New York
10018.

                                R E C I T A L S:
                                - - - - - - - -

     WHEREAS,  on November 11, 1998 the parties  hereto  entered into a certai0n
Agreement providing,  among other things, for the issuance of a Letter of Credit
upon the  application  of ZD for the  benefit  of Play  Co.  to  secure  certain
obligations  of Play Co. and which  provided  further  that Play Co. would pay a
certain defined "Guaranty Fee" (the "Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS,  the parties desire to resolve  questions  between them concerning
the amount of the  Guaranty  Fee and the payment  thereof and to  terminate  the
Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed:

     1. Play Co. shall pay to ZD the sum of $500,000.00 in full  satisfaction of
any and all obligations to ZD for the Guaranty Fee.


<PAGE>
     2. Effective  upon such payment,  ZD's  obligations  under the Agreement to
guaranty  the  credit of Play Co.  and to  provide  letters  of credit  shall be
terminated  and the parties  shall release be deemed to have released each other
from  any  and  all  claims,  demands  or  obligations  of any  nature,  kind or
description arising out of the Agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties have set their hands and seals the day and
year first above written.


                                           PLAY CO. TOYS & ENTERTAINMENT  CORP.



                                       By: /s/____________________________



                                           ZD GROUP, LLC



                                       By: /s/____________________________
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21592]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  Weeks of October 2 and 9, 2017
    Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.
    Wednesday, October 11. 2017, at 10:00 a.m. and at 2:00 p.m.

PLACE:  Board Agenda Room, No. 5065, 1015 Half St. SE., Washington DC.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Pursuant to Sec.  102.139(a) of the Board's 
Rules and Regulations, the Board or a panel thereof will consider ``the 
issuance of a subpoena, the Board's participation in a civil action or 
proceeding or an arbitration, or the initiation, conduct, or 
disposition . . . of particular representation or unfair labor practice 
proceedings under section 8, 9, or 10 of the [National Labor Relations] 
Act, or any court proceedings collateral or ancillary thereto.'' See 
also 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Roxanne Rothschild, Deputy 
Executive Secretary, 1015 Half Street SE., Washington, DC 20570. 
Telephone: (202) 273-2917.

     Dated: October 3, 2017.
Roxanne Rothschild,
Deputy Executive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-21592 Filed 10-3-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7545-01-P
Exhibit 8.1

List of Principal Subsidiaries



|                                   |  |              |  |           
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------ |  | ----------
|Subsidiaries                       |  | Jurisdiction |  | Short Name
|Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. |  | Chile        |  | San Isidro
|Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A.   |  | Chile        |  | Celta     
|Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.   |  | Chile        |  | Pehuenche 
|GasAtacama S.A                     |  | Chile        |  | GasAtacama
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47074-47075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Twelfth RTCA SC-233 Addressing Human Factors/Pilot Interface 
Issues for Avionics Plenary

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of 
Transportation.

ACTION: Twelfth RTCA SC-233 Addressing Human Factors/Pilot Interface 
Issues for Avionics Plenary.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Twelfth RTCA SC-233 Addressing Human Factors/Pilot Interface 
Issues for Avionics Plenary.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 23, 2017 10:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th 
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036 to be hosted as a virtual 
meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Morrison at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#97e5faf8e5e5fee4f8f9d7e5e3f4f6b9f8e5f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bf9e6e4f9f9e2f8e4e5cbf9ffe8eaa5e4f9ec">[email protected]</span></a> 
or 202-330-0654, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 
910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at 
(202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Twelfth RTCA SC-233 Addressing Human 
Factors/Pilot Interface Issues for Avionics

[[Page 47075]]

Plenary. The agenda will include the following:

October 23, 2017 10:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m.

1. Introduction, DFO Statement, Opening Remarks
2. September 2017 Minutes Approval
3. Consider a Motion To Approve Submitting the Document to the Program 
Management Committee
4. Other Business
5. Action Items
6. Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 4, 2017.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17, 
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017-21714 Filed 10-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        DIGITAL DESCRIPTOR SYSTEMS, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A-3 for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael Pellegrino, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB/A-3 of the Company fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Digital
Descriptor Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


Date: April 11, 2006


/s/ Michael Pellegrino
-------------------------------------
Michael Pellegrino
Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL17-93-000]

                    On September 29, 2017, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. EL17-93-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether the proposed rate decreases of System Energy Resources, Inc. may be unjust and unreasonable.                     *System Energy Resources, Inc.,*                     160 FERC ¶61,140 (2017).                

                    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL17-93-000, established pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL17-93-000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 (2017), within 21 days of the date of issuance of the order.

Dated: September 29, 2017.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-21871 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Far Vista Interactive Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce
Hoggard, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May 18, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/ Bruce
      HoggardName:
      Bruce HoggardTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the June 30, 2008 Form 10-Q of CornellCompanies, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Hyman, ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chairman of the Board, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 
| 1. |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                 |
|----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |

 
|   | /s/ James  E. Hyman                       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | James  E. Hyman, Chief Executive Officer, |
|   | President  and Chairman of the Board      |
|   | August 8, 2008                       |

 

Note: The certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.Registration Statements or other documents filed with the Securities andExchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit, except as otherwisestated in such filing.

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Entheos Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel Rayat, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i)

the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                   |  |                            |  |                                         
|------------------ |  | -------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                   |  | ENTHEOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|                   |  |                            |  |                                         
|Date: May 10, 2006 |  | By:                        |  | /s/ Harmel Rayat                        
|                   |  |                            |  | Harmel Rayat
Principal Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                  SUBSIDIARIES


          Innkeepers USA Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the
"Company"), operates principally through two entities, (i) Innkeepers Financial
Corporation, a Virginia corporation ("IFC"), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Company, and (ii) Innkeepers USA Limited Partnership, a Virginia limited
partnership (the "Partnership"), of which IFC owns an approximately 82.1%
interest. All of the Company's hotels are owned by the Partnership or
subsidiary limited partnerships which are owned 99% by the Partnership and 1%
by either the Company directly or corporations which are wholly-owned by the
Company.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio DeJesus, Appellant.

[667 NYS2d 272]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered November 9, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly found that two of the identifying witnesses had independent sources for their respective identifications. Each witness viewed the defendant under well-lit conditions for a few minutes while the defendant was robbing them *(see, People v Daniels,*128 AD2d 631).

The defendant’s contention that the jury charge deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Cadorette,*56 NY2d 1007, 1009). In any event, when viewed in its entirety, the charge delivered by the court explained the concepts of reasonable doubt and the People’s burden of proof and made it clear that the defendant bore no burden *(see, People v Toribio,*240 AD2d 519). The court’s statement to the effect that the jury should not hide behind the concept of reasonable doubt to avoid an unpleasant task neither shifted the burden to the defendant nor diluted the People’s burden of proof *(see, People v Toribio, supra).*

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.
#### Thomas Fergus, Appellant, v Brooklyn Law School, Respondent.

[665 NYS2d 81]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered on or about April 11, 1997, which granted defendant’s motion to vacate a default and the order directing an inquest, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs and disbursements, the motion denied and the parties directed to proceed to inquest.

Plaintiff sues for personal injuries sustained as a result of a fire, allegedly caused by overheating inside the outlet next to his bed, in a residential building owned and operated by defendant. In a letter to defendant dated May 28, 1996, plaintiff’s attorney set forth a detailed analysis of defendant’s misconduct and plaintiffs damages and invited serious settlement negotiations. Attached to the letter was a draft complaint, which, according to the letter, counsel would “refrain from * * * serving * * * for twenty * * * days.” After being told by defendant’s liability insurer that it was “not interested in settling the case”, plaintiff, on June 18, 1996, served a summons and complaint on defendant. No answer or notice of appearance was interposed. On November 1, 1996, the IAS Court granted plaintiffs motion for a default judgment and set the matter down for inquest. Subsequently, on March 26, 1997, defendant moved to vacate the default on the ground that defendant did not realize that a lawsuit had been commenced. Defense counsel noted that both the complaint and the draft complaint that had been attached to the May 28, 1996 pre-litigation letter from plaintiff’s counsel lacked index numbers and that both complaints appeared to be identical.

As subsequent events disclose, defendant’s counsel had removed the summons from the packet containing the summons and complaint, a unified document bound together by three large staples and a blue litigation back, on which defen*63dant had admitted service. The removed summons showed the index number assigned to the case, the filing date and County Clerk’s red stamp. The alteration was compounded by the fact that with the summons and complaint plaintiff had served a “First Request for the Production of Documents”, which also, on the first page, contained the index number, clearly marked. A demonstrably false excuse will not justify the vacatur of a default.

Nor has defendant shown a meritorious defense. In his affidavit, one of defendant’s officers refers to the opinion of “an expert in the field”, not otherwise identified, “who has made a determination that the fire was not caused by a defect in the electrical wiring * * * [but] by the overloading of an extension cord.” Aside from its hearsay nature, the proffered defense fails because it is devoid of details or supporting facts. (See, *e.g., Maida v Rite Aid Corp.,*210 AD2d 589, 591.) Thus, defendant failed to establish either of the prerequisites for vacatur of a default. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Williams and Andrias, JJ.