alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2719 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2719

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ceiling fans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2009

 Mr. Crowley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ceiling fans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CEILING FANS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.84.14 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2012''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 16.04

June 11, 1999

Audit Committee
CyberGuard Corporation
2000 W. Commercial Boulevard
Suite 200
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309

Gentlemen:

We have examined the consolidated balance sheets of CyberGuard Corporation as of
June 30, 1997 and 1996 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended June 30, 1997, the nine
months ended June 30, 1996, and the year ended September 30, 1995 and issued our
auditors' report thereon dated September 23, 1997 (the "1997 auditors' report").

Further, on September 11, 1996, we issued our auditors' report (the "1996
auditors' report") on the consolidated balance sheets of CyberGuard Corporation
as of June 30, 1996 and September 30, 1995 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the nine
months ended June 30, 1996 and year ended September 30, 1995.

On May 28,1999 CyberGuard Corporation's Chief Financial Officer informed us that
CyberGuard Corporation "is prepared to issue restated financial statements for
its 1997 fiscal year, including a restated opening balance sheet as of June 30,
1996."

In light of the CyberGuard Corporation's intent to restate its financial
statements, w cannot continue to be associated with such financial statements
and, accordingly, KPMG hereby advises you that our "1997 and 1996 auditors'
reports" should no longer be relied on.

We advise CyberGuard Corporation to promptly consult with legal counsel
regarding any disclosure or reports to regulatory agencies or others which may
be appropriate.

Very truly yours,

Signed: KPMG LLP






                                      -92-
**EXHIBIT 31.2*****CERTIFICATIONS***I, Jane M. Richards., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of PYR Energy Corporation.2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date:  April 9, 2007 /s/ Jane M. Richards   Jane M. Richards   Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of National Property Analysts Master
Limited Partnership ("NPAMLP") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Robert McKinney, President of Feldman International, Inc.,
the Equity General Partner of NPAMLP certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NPAMLP.

                                   National Property Analysts Master Limited
                                   Partnership
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   (Registrant)

                                   Date: March 29, 2005

                                   By: Feldman International Inc., its equity
                                       general partner

                                   By: /s/ Robert McKinney
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name: Robert McKinney
                                       Title: President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6117

NEVELL ROGERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT S. CARR, United States Magistrate Judge,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-3829-3-OBC)

Submitted: May 28, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996

Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nevell Rogers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rogers v. Carr,

No. CA-95-3829-3-OBC (D.S.C. Jan. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000546 27-SEP-2013 08:39 AM
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.3

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, DAVID A. SIMON, CERTIFY THAT:

1. I HAVE REVIEWED THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF NATIONAL PROPERTY ANALYSTS
MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ("NPAMLP");

2. BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS REPORT DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY UNTRUE STATEMENT OF A
MATERIAL FACT OR OMIT TO STATE A MATERIAL FACT NECESSARY TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS
MADE, IN LIGHT OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH SUCH STATEMENTS WERE MADE, NOT
MISLEADING WITH RESPECT TO THE PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT;

3. BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND OTHER FINANCIAL
INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT, FAIRLY PRESENT IN ALL MATERIAL RESPECTS THE
FINANCIAL CONDITION, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS OF THE REGISTRANT AS
OF, AND FOR, THE PERIODS PRESENTED IN THIS REPORT;

4. THE REGISTRANT'S OTHER CERTIFYING OFFICER(S) AND I ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR
ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (AS DEFINED IN
EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-15(E) AND 15D-15(E)) FOR THE REGISTRANT AND HAVE:

(A) DESIGNED SUCH DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES, OR CAUSED SUCH DISCLOSURE
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES TO BE DESIGNED UNDER OUR SUPERVISION, TO ENSURE THAT
MATERIAL INFORMATION RELATING TO THE REGISTRANT, INCLUDING ITS CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES, IS MADE KNOWN TO US BY OTHERS WITHIN THOSE ENTITIES, PARTICULARLY
DURING THE PERIOD IN WHICH THIS REPORT IS BEING PREPARED;

(B) EVALUATED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REGISTRANT'S DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES AND PRESENTED IN THIS REPORT OUR CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE EFFECTIVENESS
OF THE DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES, AS OF THE END OF THE PERIOD COVERED
BY THIS REPORT BASED ON SUCH EVALUATION; AND

(C) DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT ANY CHANGE IN THE REGISTRANT'S INTERNAL CONTROL
OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING THAT OCCURRED DURING THE REGISTRANT'S MOST RECENT
FISCAL QUARTER (THE REGISTRANT'S FOURTH FISCAL QUARTER IN THE CASE OF AN ANNUAL
REPORT) THAT HAS MATERIALLY AFFECTED, OR IS REASONABLY LIKELY TO MATERIALLY
AFFECT, THE REGISTRANT'S INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING; AND

5. THE REGISTRANT'S OTHER CERTIFYING OFFICER(S) AND I HAVE DISCLOSED, BASED ON
OUR MOST RECENT EVALUATION OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING, TO THE
REGISTRANT'S AUDITORS AND THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE REGISTRANT'S BOARD OF
DIRECTORS (OR PERSONS PERFORMING THE EQUIVALENT FUNCTIONS):

(A) ALL SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES AND MATERIAL WEAKNESSES IN THE DESIGN OR
OPERATION OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING WHICH ARE REASONABLY
LIKELY TO ADVERSELY AFFECT THE REGISTRANT'S ABILITY TO RECORD, PROCESS,
SUMMARIZE AND REPORT FINANCIAL INFORMATION; AND

(B) ANY FRAUD, WHETHER OR NOT MATERIAL, THAT INVOLVES MANAGEMENT OR OTHER
EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN THE REGISTRANT'S INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
FINANCIAL REPORTING.

DATE: MARCH 30, 2007


BY: EBL&S PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC.,
    AGENT FOR NPAMLP


BY: /S/ DAVID A. SIMON
    ---------------------------------
NAME: DAVID A. SIMON
TITLE: VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF
       FINANCIAL OFFICER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         October 10, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 3, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 366 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-3, CP2018-3.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-21664 Filed 10-6-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99(b)

                CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Union Financial Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard H.
Flake, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
              the Report.

                                    /s/ Richard H. Flake
                                    --------------------------------
                                    Richard H. Flake
                                    Executive Vice President and
                                    Chief Financial Officer

Date:   December 2, 2002
**Exhibit 10.42B**

**AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO FLORIDA CHOICE BANK**

**OFFICERS’ AND EMPLOYEES’ STOCK OPTION PLAN**

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE FLORIDA CHOICE BANK OFFICERS’ ANDEMPLOYEES’ STOCK OPTION PLAN (the “Amendment”) is made as of the 1st day of May, 2004. 

WITNESSETH THAT: 

WHEREAS, the Boardof Directors and the shareholders of Florida Choice Bank (the “Bank”) have authorized, adopted and approved an Officers’ and Employees’ Stock Option Plan, as amended (the “Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, the Bank desires to amend the Plan in certain respects. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Defined Terms. All terms used in thisAmendment which are defined in the Plan shall have the meanings specified in the Plan, unless specifically defined herein. 

2. Amendmentof Section 4.1. Section 4.1 of the Plan shall be amended to provide that, subject to adjustment pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.3 of the Plan, the number of shares of Stock which may be issued and sold under the Planpursuant to Stock Option Agreements shall not exceed One Hundred Seven Thousand One Hundred Twenty-Four (107,124) shares. 

3.Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank has caused this Amendment to be duly executed by its officer thereunto duly authorized, all as of the date first above written.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of Diversified
Futures Trust I (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer

---

Kenneth A. Shewer

Chief Executive Officer

March 30, 2005
#### Douglas S. Smith, Appellant, v Taitz, Bernard & Esteve, Respondent.

[666 NYS2d 18]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to enjoin the defendant from collecting a judgment entered against the plaintiff in an action entitled *Mindling v Smith,*pending in the District Court, Suffolk County, the plaintiff appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), dated June 14, 1996, as granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, and (2) from an order of the same court, dated July 11, 1996, which denied his motion for reargument.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated July 11, 1996, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated June 14, 1996, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

*284Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

Considering the plaintiff’s allegations to be true, and giving him the benefit of every possible favorable inference (see, *Rovello v Orofino Realty Co.,*40 NY2d 633), we agree with the Supreme Court’s determination that the complaint failed to state a cause of action.

The plaintiffs remaining contentions lack merit. Santucci, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21335]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): October 4, 
2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 29, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 365 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017-213, CP2017-321.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-21335 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 10.4


 


Arowana Inc.


Level 11, 153 Walker Street


North Sydney, NSW 2060


Australia


 


_____________, 2014


 


 


Arowana International


Level 11, 153 Walker Street


North Sydney, NSW 2060


Australia


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that,
commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of Arowana Inc.
(the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial
business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier
date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Arowana International shall make available to
the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated
at Level 11, 153 Walker Street, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia (or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company
shall pay Arowana International the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the
Termination Date. Arowana International hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in
or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) to be established upon
the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a
result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the
Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 





	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	AROWANA INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title:
	 	 	 



 


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


	 
	 	 	 
	AROWANA INTERNATIONAL


	 
	 	 	 
	By:		 
	 	Name:	 
	 	Title: