alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(a)18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification     I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the accompanying Form10-KSB of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-KSB fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bancorp.        By:  /s/ Mary B. Halsey March 26, 2007   Mary B. Halsey                                                         Date  President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)   
 

 
     Exhibit 32(b)18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification     I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the accompanying Form10-KSB of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-KSB fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bancorp.        By:  /s/ R. Lee Whitehead March 26, 2007   R. Lee Whitehead                                                         Date  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Order filed October 24, 2017.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00324

- CV

____________ JESSE ANDREW LOPEZ , Appellant

V.
SHARI GRACE OCCHIOGROSSO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 328th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. 17

- DCV

- 240212



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due October 11, 2017. No brief or motion for
extension of time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before November 24,
2017 , the court will dismiss the a ppeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 96-1800

______________

JAMES J. O'CONNELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; CLARENCE EDWARDS,

Chief of Police,

Defendants - Appellees.

______________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA93-733-PJM)

______________

Argued: July 16, 1997 Decided: November 24, 1997

______________

Before MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge, BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge, and

FOX, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of

North Carolina, sitting by designation.

______________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. ______________

ARGUED: Lori Elizabeth Kline, JACOBS, JACOBS & FARBER, Rockville,

Maryland, for Appellant. Bruce P. Sherman, Senior Assistant County

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Rockville, Maryland, for

Appellees. ON BRIEF: Mindy G. Farber, Jack D. Isaacs, JACOBS,

JACOBS & FARBER, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Charles W.

Thompson, Jr., County Attorney, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY,

Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

______________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant James J. O'Connell appeals the district court's

order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees in this

action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and Article 27, § 733

of the Maryland Code, "The Law Enforcement Officer's Bill of

Rights." O'Connell claimed his civil rights were violated by his

transfers within the Montgomery County, Maryland, Police Department, allegedly in retaliation for his invocation of his First

Amendment rights. His Complaint sought reinstatement, injunctive

relief and compensatory, as well as punitive damages.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion,

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. O'Connell v. Montgomery County,

Maryland, No. CA-PJM-93-733 (D. Md. April 30, 1996).

AFFIRMED
Opinion issued April 28, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 13

- 00046

- CV

——————————— ANNIE EAST , Appellant
V.
SOUTHWEST CIMM’S INC . D/B/A BURGER KING #1002 A/K/A CIMM’S INCORPO RATED , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No

. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 997701

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant , Annie East, has filed two unopposed motions to dismiss this
appeal, informing the Court that “all matters in c ontroversy” between the parties2 have been “ settled” and “ resolved.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1 (a) (1 )

. The parties
have agreed that each will bear its own costs. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1 (d)

. We grant the motion s and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1 (a)(1 ). We withdraw our August 28, 2014 majority and dissenting opinions
and judgment

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(c). We dismiss all other pending motions

as moot.

PER CURIAM

Pane l co nsists of Justices Jennings, Brown , and Lloyd.
EX-4.16



 Exhibit 4.16 

Supplementary Agreement to the Equity Transfer Agreement 

Party A: Beijing Hongkungu Investment Company Limited 
 Address:
Building No. 1, Hongkun Financial Valley, Xihongmen Town, Daxing District, Beijing 
 Party B: Infoexcel Technology Limited 

Address: 
 Party C: QIGI&BODEE Technology (Beijing) Co.,
Limited 
 Address: Room 401, Building 402, No. 10 A Jiuxianqiao North Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 

Party D: Techfaith Intelligent Handset Technology (Beijing) Limited 

Address: Tower D, Mfox Plaza, Ke Chuang 12th Street, Beijing Economic-Technological Development Area (Yi Zhuang), Beijing 

Whereas, 
 Party A, Party B, Party C and Party D (the
“Parties”)have entered into an Equity Transfer Agreement in relation to Techfaith Intelligent Handset Technology (Beijing) Limited dated April 5, 2017 (hereafter referred to as the “Original Agreement”). 

Upon friendly negotiation, the Parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Since Party A needs Party’s further cooperation in dealing with change of plot ratio for the subject projectunder the Original Agreement, the payment date of the third installation of transaction price, namely RMB
300 million, as agreed in Article 3.4 of the Original Agreement, shall be postponed to not later than 10 working days upon Party A receives the approval of the change of plot ratio for the subject project. 


 

	2.	As an indemnification for the postponed payment and guarantee of payment, prior to the fully payment of transaction price, Party A agrees to provide the ownership of six buildings of the subject project and all proceeds
arising therefrom as collateral to Party B. 

  

	3.	Except for those agreed hereto, other provisions of the Original Contract remain unchanged. 

  

	4.	In case of any controversy or dispute arising from or in relation to any provision of this Agreement or in the performance of this Agreement, Party A and Party B shall negotiate in good faith and based on the principle
of fair and amity. If no consensus is reached within 15 working days with that respect, either party may refer the case to the People’s Court where the contract was entered into for resolution by litigation. 


 

	5.	This Agreement is made in quadruplicate with each party holding one copy, all of which will take effect upon sealed by each party and have same legal effect. 


The Remaining of This Page Is Left Blank Intentionally 







 (Signature page) 

Party A: Beijing Hongkungu Investment Company Limited 
 Signature
of the Representative: /s/ Beijing Hongkungu Investment Company Limited (Company Seal) 
 Date: 2017-12-24 

Party B: Infoexcel Technology Limited 
 Signature of the
Representative: /s/ Infoexcel Technology Limited (Company Seal) 
 Date: 2017-12-24 

Party C: QIGI&BODEE Technology (Beijing) Co., Limited 

Signature of the Representative: /s/ QIGI&BODEE Technology (Beijing) Co., Limited (Company Seal) 

Date: 2017-12-24 
 Party
D: Techfaith Intelligent Handset Technology (Beijing) Limited 
 Signature of the Representative: /s/ Techfaith Intelligent Handset Technology (Beijing)
Limited (Company Seal) 
 Date: 2017-12-24 

Signed at Daxing District, Beijing
IB 

Union Calendar No. 194 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2781 

[Report No. 111–336] 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the 

Molalla River in Oregon, as components of the National Wild and Scenic 

Rivers System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2009 

Mr. SCHRADER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

NOVEMBER 16, 2009 

Additional sponsors: Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. WU, and Mr. DEFAZIO

NOVEMBER 16, 2009 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 9, 2009] 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2781 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

segments of the Molalla River in Oregon, as components 

of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and 

for other purposes. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2781 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER 

4 SEGMENTS. 

5 Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(lll) MOLALLA RIVER, OREGON.—The following 

9 segments in the State of Oregon, to be administered by the 

10 Secretary of the Interior as a recreational river: 

11 ‘‘(A) MOLALLA RIVER.—The approximately 15.1 

12 miles from the southern boundary line of section 19, 

13 Township 7 south, Range 4 east downstream to the 

14 edge of the Bureau of Land Management boundary in 

15 section 7, Township 6 south, Range 3 east. 

16 ‘‘(B) TABLE ROCK FORK MOLALLA RIVER.—The 

17 approximately 6.2 miles from the easternmost Bureau 

18 of Land Management boundary line in the northeast 

19 quarter of section 4, Township 7 south, Range 4 east 

20 downstream to the confluence with the Molalla 

21 River.’’. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 194 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2781 

[Report No. 111–336] 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to desRivers System, and for other purposes. as components of the National Wild and Scenic ignate segments of the Molalla River in Oregon, 

NOVEMBER 16, 2009 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
IB 

Union Calendar No. 305 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2864 

[Report No. 111–531] 

To amend the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act of 1998 to authorize 

funds to acquire hydrographic data and provide hydrographic services 

specific to the Arctic for safe navigation, delineating the United States 

extended continental shelf, and the monitoring and description of coastal 

changes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2009 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

JULY 13, 2010 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 12, 2009] 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2864 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act of 

1998 to authorize funds to acquire hydrographic data 

and provide hydrographic services specific to the Arctic 

for safe navigation, delineating the United States extended continental shelf, and the monitoring and description of coastal changes. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2864 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

4 Section 306 of the Hydrographic Services Improve5 ment Act of 1998 (33 U.S.C. 892d) is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting before the text the following: ‘‘(a) 

7 IN GENERAL.—’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 section: 

10 ‘‘(b) ARCTIC PROGRAMS.—Of the amount authorized 

11 for each of fiscal years 2011 and 2012— 

12 ‘‘(1) $5,000,000 is authorized for use to acquire 

13 hydrographic data, provide hydrographic services, 

14 conduct coastal change analyses necessary to ensure 

15 safe navigation, and improve the management of 

16 coastal change in the Arctic; and 

17 ‘‘(2) $2,000,000 is authorized for use to acquire 

18 hydrographic data and provide hydrographic services 

19 in the Arctic necessary to delineate the United States 

20 extended Continental Shelf.’’. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 305 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2864 

[Report No. 111–531] 

A BILL 

To amend the Hydrographic Services Improvement 

coastal changes. shelf, and the monitoring and description of eating the United States extended continental specific to the Arctic for safe navigation, delingraphic data and provide hydrographic services Act of 1998 to authorize funds to acquire hydroJULY 13, 2010 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Loxley Swaby, Respondent, v Ana D. Maldonado, Appellant.

[858 NYS2d 898]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Saitta, J.), dated August 2, 2007, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see*
      *693
      *Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint regardless of the sufficiency of the opposition papers *(see Hussain v Wang,*18 AD3d 816 [2005]). Rivera, J.P, Lifson, Miller, Garni and Eng, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                        --------------------------------
           As adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, E. Gerald Kay, the Chief Executive Officer of Integrated BioPharma, Inc.
(the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:   February 14, 2005


                                           By:/s/ E. Gerald Kay
                                           E. Gerald Kay
                                           Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,357
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               2
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,462
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,615
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             500
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               509
<LOANS>                                         63,655
<ALLOWANCE>                                        796
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,766
<DEPOSITS>                                      71,283
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                420
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           800
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  79,766
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,829
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  133
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   117
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,079
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,603
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,603
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,476
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       74
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,056
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    429
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         264
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       264
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.64
<LOANS-NON>                                          5
<LOANS-PAST>                                        97
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    471
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   728
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       19
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  796
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            796
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.42C

AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO FLORIDA CHOICE BANKSHARES, INC.

OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION
PLAN

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE FLORIDA CHOICE BANKSHARES, INC. OFFICERS
AND EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION PLAN (the Amendment) is made as of the 25thday of April, 2005.

WITNESSETH THAT:

WHEREAS, Florida Choice Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) has an Officers and Employees Stock Option Plan, as amended (the Plan), which the Company assumed in connection with its acquisition of Florida
Choice Bank; and

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1. Defined Terms. All terms used in this Amendment which are defined in the Plan shall have the meanings specified in the Plan, unless specifically defined herein.

2. Amendment of Section 4.1. Section 4.1 of the Plan shall be amended to provide that, subject to adjustment pursuant to the provisions
of Section 4.3 of the Plan, the number of shares of Stock which may be issued and sold under the Plan pursuant to Stock Option Agreements shall not exceed Two Hundred Fifty Six Thousand One Hundred Twenty-Four (256,124) shares.

3. Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full
force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed by its officer thereunto duly authorized,
all as of the date first above written.



FLORIDA CHOICE BANKSHARES, INC.By:

/s/ Kenneth E. LaRoeKenneth E. LaRoeChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit



Exhibit 10(b)







ALLETE Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan
Form of Cash Award
Effective 2018
[CEO and CFO]


Target Award Opportunity


	
		
	Base Salary
	$

	 
	 

	Times
	 

	 
	 

	Award Opportunity (percent of base salary)
	%

	 
	 

	Equals
	 

	 
	 

	Target Award 
	$






Performance Levels and Award Amounts




	
			
	Goal Performance Level
	Payout as Percent of 
Target Award
	Award Amount 

	Superior
	200% 
	$

	Target
	100% 
	$

	Threshold
	45% 
	$

	Below Threshold
	0% 
	$






Goals


	
									
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Goal

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Weighting

	 
	Financial Goals
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Net Income 
	50%

	 
	 
	Cash from Operating Activities
	 
	25%

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Strategic & Operational Positioning Goals
	 
	 
	 
	  25% 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	100%








Compensation Subject to Compensation Recovery Policy


Long-Term Incentive Plan compensation is subject to recoupment as defined in the Compensation Recovery policy.
EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>

                                    INTELLIGROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
<CAPTION>


                                       Three Months Ended September 30,    Nine Months Ended September 30,
                                       --------------------------------    -------------------------------

                                           1997              1996              1997             1996
                                       -------------     --------------    -------------   --------------
<S>                                    <C>            <C>                  <C>             <C>

Net income (loss)                      $  1,581,000   $   (600,000)        $  3,587,000    $   (105,000)
                                       ============   ============         ============    ============

Weighted average shares outstanding      11,925,000      7,322,000           11,153,000       9,331,000

Incremental shares
      considered outstanding (1) (2)        402,000      1,555,000              402,000       1,494,000
                                       ------------   ------------         ------------    ------------


Shares used in per share calculation     12,327,000      8,877,000           11,555,000      10,825,000
                                       ============   ============         ============    ============


Net income (loss) per share            $       0.13   $      (0.07)        $       0.31    $      (0.01)
                                       ============   ============         ============    ============


(1) Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities and Exchange  Commission,  stock options and warrants
issued by the Company during the twelve months immediately  preceding the initial public offering have been
included in computing net income per share as if they were  outstanding  for all periods using the treasury
stock method.

(2) Includes dilutive stock options, using the treasury method.

</TABLE>