alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                          CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Emclaire Financial Corp. (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here (the "Report"), I,
David L. Cox, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Corporation.

/s/David L. Cox
---------------
David L. Cox
Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2004



                                       42
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 17, 2016

No. 04-16-00096-CV

IN RE JAMES E. FAIRLEY,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PC-1068

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's Motion for Referral to Mediation is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of June, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Motion Granted; Order and Dissent to Order filed March 9, 2021. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00817-CV

____________

KITTEN STRAHAN AND LEOPOLD SISTER PROPERTIES, LLC, 

Appellants

V.

JAMES DEAVER SERVICES, INC. AND JAMES E. DEAVER, JR., 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 10th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-CV-0531

ORDER

On February 11, 2021, appellees filed an unopposed motion to substitute

counsel. The motion is GRANTED.

/s/ Tracy Christopher

Chief Justice

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wilson and Spain. (Spain, 

J., dissenting).
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANTTO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SRSLabs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), Thomas C.K. Yuen, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 7, 2006 |   |                     |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                   | By:    | /S/  Thomas C.K. Yuen    |
|                   |   | Thomas  C.K. Yuen        |
|                   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

1

----
**Exhibit 10.5B**

**AMENDMENT FIVE**

**ALABAMA NATIONAL BANCORPORATION**

**PLAN FOR THE DEFERRAL OF COMPENSATION**

**BY NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS OF THE**

**SUBSIDIARY BANKS**

This Amendment Five to the Alabama National BanCorporation Plan for the Deferral of Compensation by Non-Employee Directors of the Subsidiary Banks ishereby made as of this 30th day of December, 2005, by Alabama National BanCorporation. 

**WITNESSETH:**

**WHEREAS**,Alabama National BanCorporation (the “Employer”) has previously adopted and approved the Alabama National BanCorporation Plan for the Deferral of Compensation by Non-Employee Directors of the Subsidiary Banks (the “Plan”);

**WHEREAS**, pursuant to duly adopted resolutions, the Board of Directors of the Employer has elected to adopt an amendment (the“Amendment”) to the Plan in order to ensure that amounts deferred under the Plan and allocated as a share allotment are not required to be classified as a liability of the Employer pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement123 (revised 2004), *Share-Based Payment* (“FAS 123(R)”); and 

**WHEREAS**, the Employer and the Participants now desireto amend the Plan in accordance Section 7(d) and in accordance with the foregoing. 

**NOW, THEREFORE,**the Plan is hereby amendedas follows: 

1. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined herein have the respective meanings assigned to suchterms in the Plan. 

2. Effective January 1, 2006, Section 6(c) of the Plan is amended by deleting the existing language thereinin its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 

“(c) Distribution shall be in accordance with Sections 5(b), 5(c) and5(e) above, except that distribution of stock equivalents in the Account shall be made, as determined by the Company, in either (i) shares of Common Stock in accordance with the provisions of Section 4(c)(iii), or (ii) in cash in anamount equal to the number of stock equivalents to be distributed multiplied by the greater of (i) the Average Closing Price of the Common Stock for the twenty (20) trading days ending on the day preceding the date on which the right tosuch distribution arose; (ii) the Average Closing Price of the Common Stock for the twenty (20) trading days ending on the day preceding the date of the Change in Control; or (iii) the highest price per share of Common Stock in thetransaction or series of transactions constituting the Change in Control.” 

3. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Plannot herein modified shall remain in full force and effect. 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the Employer has caused this Amendment Five to the Alabama NationalBanCorporation Plan for the Deferral of Compensation by Non-Employee Directors of the Subsidiary Banks to be executed by its duly authorized officer and to be consented to by each of the current Participants as of the date first written above.

 
**ALABAMA NATIONAL BANCORPORATION**(Employer)By:  
/s/ John H. Holcomb III

Its:
 
Chairman of the Board

 

- 2 -
##### 



Exhibit 99

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and
the Chief Financial Officer of LCC International, Inc. (the
Company), each hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge on the date hereof:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (a) the Form 10-Q of the Company for
    the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2002, filed on the date
    hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and
|
| | (b) information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                     



| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ C. THOMAS FAULDERS, III
| |                            
| | C. Thomas Faulders, III    
| | Chief Executive Officer    
| | August 14, 2002            
|
| | /s/ DAVID N. WALKER        
| |                            
| | David N. Walker            
| | Chief Financial Officer    
| | August 14, 2002
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MANUEL ALEJANDRO VALMANA

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 0 0 0 84

- C R

Appeal from the

210 th Dis trict Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 201 70D04663 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’ s fourth motion for extension of time within which to

file the b rief until April 25

, 201 9

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

F ILE THE APPELLANT ’ S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. James D. Lucas

, the Appellant ’ s attorney, prepare

the Appellant ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 25

, 201 9

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 6 th day of April

, 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
**Exhibit 11**Calculationof Net Income per Share
  **2003**  **2004**   **Three Months Ended**  **Nine Months Ended**  **Three Months Ended**  **Nine Months Ended**   **September 30,**  **September 30,**  **September 30,**  **September 30,**   **Net**      **Per Share**  **Net**      **Per Share**  **Net**      **Per Share**  **Net**      **Per Share**   **Loss**  **Shares**  **Amount**  **Loss**  **Shares**  **Amount**  **Income**  **Shares**  **Amount**  **Income**  **Shares**  **Amount**   **(In thousands, except per share data)**  **(In thousands, except per share data)** Basic EPS                                                Net income (loss) available to commonshareholders $(1,025)  21,002  $(0.05) $(7,162)  20,977  $(0.34) $639   24,411  $0.03  $399   24,392  $0.02                                                                                           Effect of Dilutive Securities                                                Stock option plans      —           —           577           978                                                                                                   Dilutive EPS                                                Net income (loss) available to commonshareholders and assumed conversions $(1,025)  21,002  $(0.05) $(7,162)  20,977  $(0.34) $639   24,988  $0.03  $399   25,370  $0.02                                                NOTE: Options to purchase 4.5 million shares of Class A Common Stock were outstandingduring the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, but were not included inthe computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.Options to purchase 3.3 million and 2.3 million shares of Class A Common Stock were outstandingduring the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively, but were not included inthe computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cornell Flowers, Appellant

(Appeal No. 3.)

[669 NYS2d 115]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same Memorandum as in *People v Flowers*([appeal No. 1] 245 AD2d 1088 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6042

CARL STANLEY AIKEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COLIE RUSHTON, Warden of McCormick

Correctional Institution; HENRY MCMASTER,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-04-99-6-13AK)

Submitted: May 25, 2005 Decided: June 3, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Stanley Aiken, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Carl Stanley Aiken, a South Carolina prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition

filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken

from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Aiken has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (the Report) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 November
23, 2005
    
    /s/ Dean J. DouglasDean J. DouglasPresident and Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00019-CV 

CHERIE ALLEN APPELLANT

V.

CITY OF FORT WORTH AND 

TARRANT COUNTY DISTRICT 

CLERK’S OFFICE

APPELLEES 

----------

FROM THE 236TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 236-282171-15

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Cherie Allen attempts to appeal from the trial court’s December 

22, 2015 “Order Denying Motion to Recuse.” On January 19, 2016, we informed 

appellant of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over the appeal because the 

trial court’s order did not appear to be a final judgment or an appealable 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

interlocutory order. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 

S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). We informed appellant that her appeal was 

subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless she or any party desiring to 

continue the appeal filed with the court, on or before January 29, 2016, a 

response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(a), 44.3. No response has been filed. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICE 

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 3, 2016
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Majestic Star Casino,
LLC and The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp. (collectively, the "Registrant")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jon S. Bennett,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Majestic Star Casino, LLC and
The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

By:  /s/ Jon S. Bennett
     -------------------------------------------
     Jon S. Bennett, Vice President
     and Chief Financial Officer of
     The Majestic Star Casino, LLC and
     The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.
     May 15, 2003



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# AGENCY:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members to the Performance Review Board of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Traci M. DiMartini, Chief Human Capital Officer, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 131 M Street NE., Washington, DC 20507, (202) 663-4306.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Publication of the Performance Review Board (PRB) membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB reviews and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive' s performance by the supervisor, and makes recommendations to the Chair, EEOC, with respect to performance ratings, pay level adjustments and performance awards.

The following are the names and titles of executives appointed to serve as members of the SES PRB. Designated members will serve a 12-month term; which begins on November 1, 2017.

*PRB Chair:*

Mr. Bryan C. Burnett, Chief Information Officer, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

*Members:*

Mr. Carlton Hadden, Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Ms. Germaine P. Roseboro, Chief Financial Officer, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Ms. Marika Litras, Enforcement Director, U.S. Department of Labor

Mr. Stuart Ishimaru, Assistant Director, Office of Equal Opportunity and Fairness, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

By the direction of the Commission.

Dated: September 29, 2017.

Cynthia G. Pierre,

Chief Operating Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-21530 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
Exhibit 31(b)



CERTIFICATION



I, Richard H. Flake, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Union Financial Bancshares, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 21, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    Richard H. Flake                 
|                     |  |  |  | Richard H. Flake Chief Financial Officer