alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LEGATO SYSTEMS, INC.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                                December 31, 2001

       Legato Systems Pty Ltd - Australia
       Legato Systems Ges.mbH - Austria
       Legato Systems International Inc. (FSC) - Barbados
       Legato Systems NV - Belgium
       Legato Systems do Brazil Ltda - Brazil
       Legato Systems (Canada) Inc. - Canada
       Legato Global, Inc. - Cayman Islands
       Legato Systems France SARL - France
       Legato Systems Deutschland GmbH - Germany
       Legato Systems H.K. Limited - Hong Kong
       Legato Systems India Private Limited - India
       Legato Systems Italia Srl - Italy
       Legato Systems KK - Japan
       Legato Systems Korea Y.H. - Korea
       Legato Systems de Mexico S de RL de CV - Mexico
       Legato Systems Nederland BV - Netherlands
       Legato Systems Europe Holding BV - Netherlands
       Legato Systems Norway AS - Norway
       Legato Systems Polska Sp.Zoo - Poland
       Legato Software Systems Pte Ltd - Singapore
       Legato Systems Espana SL - Spain
       LGTO System AB - Sweden
       Legato Systems Schweiz GmbH - Switzerland
       Legato Systems UK Limited - United Kingdom
       Legato Holdings, Inc. - United States
       Intelliguard Software, Inc. - United States
       O.R.P., Inc. - United States
       Lasso Acquisition Corp. - United States
CIRCUIT COURT OF LOUDOUN COUNTY

#### J.S.C. Concrete Construction, Inc. v. Drewer Development Corp. et al.

May 8, 1995

Case No. (Chancery) 13715

By Judge James H. Chamblin

The Demurrer filed by the defendants, First American Bank of Virginia and Commonwealth Abstract Corporation, Trustee, in this proceeding to enforce mechanic’s liens raises the issue of whether the memoranda claiming die liens filed by the plaintiff, J.S.C. Concrete Construction, Inc., are defective because each memoranda does not contain a statement declaring the intention to claim the benefit of the lien.

After consideration of the argument of counsel on April 7,1995, and the extensive memoranda filed by counsel, the Demurrer is overruled.

Section 43-4 does state that a memorandum of mechanic’s lien shall include “a statement declaring (the mechanic’s lienor’s) intention to claim the benefit of the lien.” Section 43-5 provides that the memorandum required by Section 43-4 shall be sufficient if substantially in the form and effect as set forth in the statute.

The memoranda of mechanic’s lien filed by the plaintiff in this case (1) do not contain a specific statement of intention to claim the benefit of the lien and (2) do not contain the words “Memorandum for Mechanic’s Lien Claimed by General Contractor.” The memoranda merely state “Memorandum for Mechanic’s Lien.”

I agree with Judge Stevens’ reasoning in *Hickerson Electric Service Corp. v. Drewer Development,*25 Va. Cir. 247 (1991), and Judge Home’s opinion in *Hickerson Electric Service Corp.*v. *Drewer Development Corp.,*Chancery No. 13630 (Memorandum Opinion dated February 12, 1992, Circuit Court of Loudoun County). I agree that substantial compli*314anee with the form requirements of Section 43-5 meets the statement of intent requirement of Section 43-4. I do not necessarily agree that the statement of intent requirement of Section 43-4 is only met by a heading of the memorandum stating “Memorandum for Mechanic’s Lien Claimed by General Contractor.” I feel that just plain substantial compliance with the requirements of Section 43-5 is enough.

I am of the opinion that the memoranda filed by the plaintiff are substantially in the form and effect as provided by Section 43-5. The information required by Section 43-5 should determine substantial compliance. It should not be based on whether or not the mechanic’s lienor blindly followed the words of the statute. It is clear to anyone who reads the memoranda filed by the plaintiff that it intends to claim the benefit of a mechanic’s lien. This is sufficient to satisfy the statement of intent requirement of Section 43-4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FORM 10K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 FOR AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000925988
<NAME> AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY AMERICA
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            24,770
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  24,770
<CASH>                                          51,842
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          21,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 404,385
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           64,445
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,550
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   404,385
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,557
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 (11)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                      66
<BENEFITS>                                       1,652
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,419)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (723)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (696)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (696)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DIAL
CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 29, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                           5,672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,153
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,153
<INVENTORY>                                    128,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,414
<PP&E>                                         227,333
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,076
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 832,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,788
<BONDS>                                        258,682
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           960
<OTHER-SE>                                     153,378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   832,340
<SALES>                                        316,242
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               316,242
<CGS>                                          169,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  169,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,991
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,668
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,323
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,323
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        


</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2741 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the City of Hermiston, 

Oregon, water recycling and reuse project, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2741 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

3 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102– 

4 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by 

5 inserting after section 16ll the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 16ll. CITY OF HERMISTON, OREGON, WATER RECY7 CLING AND REUSE PROJECT. 

8 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera9 tion with the City of Hermiston, Oregon, is authorized to 

10 participate in the design, planning, and construction of 

11 permanent facilities to reclaim and reuse water in the City 

12 of Hermiston, Oregon. 

13 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs 

14 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

15 25 percent of the total cost. 

16 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 

17 funds for the operation and maintenance of the project 

18 described in subsection (a).’’. 

19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

20 in section 2 of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2741 RFS 

1 Adjustment Act of 1992 is amended by inserting after the 

2 item relating to section 16ll the following: 

‘‘Sec. 16ll. City of Hermiston, Oregon, water recycling and reuse project.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.5



BDO Dunwoody LLP                                                                                                600 Cathedral Place

Chartered Accountants                                                                                       925 West Georgia Street

Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 3L2

Tel: (604) 688-5421

Fax: (604) 688-5132

E-mail:Vancouver@bdo.ca

www.bdo.ca

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





CONSENT OF

INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Minefinders Corporation Ltd

Vancouver, Canada

We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F/A (Amendment No.1) of our report dated February 23, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Minefinders Corporation Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2005.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed (March 18, 2003, December 17, 2003, and July 23, 2004) open registration statements on Form S-8 (SEC Nos. 333-103893, 333-111255, and 333-117611) of Minefinders Corporation Ltd. of our reports dated February 23, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Minefinders Corporation Ltd. appearing in the Companys Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/BDO Dunwoody LLP



BDO DUNWOODY LLP

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

April 11, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM 1/31/98 10K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,574
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    253,394
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               377,262
<PP&E>                                          41,054
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 486,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          464,253
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   486,911
<SALES>                                        812,942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               812,942
<CGS>                                          553,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  553,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               305,912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (75,572)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (95,293)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (95,293)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.91)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 273 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 273

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the treatment of 
 qualified restaurant property as 15-year property for purposes of the 
                        depreciation deduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2009

  Mr. Meek of Florida (for himself, Mr. Tiberi, Ms. Berkley, and Mr. 
   Herger) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the treatment of 
 qualified restaurant property as 15-year property for purposes of the 
                        depreciation deduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF QUALIFIED RESTAURANT PROPERTY 
              AS 15-YEAR PROPERTY FOR PURPOSES OF DEPRECIATION 
              DEDUCTION.

    (a) Treatment Made Permanent.--Clause (v) of section 168(e)(3)(E) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 15-year property) is 
amended by striking ``placed in service before January 1, 2010''.
    (b) Treatment To Include New Construction.--Paragraph (7) of 
section 168(e) of such Code (relating to classification of property) is 
amended to read as follows:
            ``(7) Qualified restaurant property.--The term `qualified 
        restaurant property' means any section 1250 property which is a 
        building or an improvement to a building if more than 50 
        percent of the building's square footage is devoted to 
        preparation of, and seating for on-premises consumption of, 
        prepared meals.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EX PARTE: JARETH CARDENAS, §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 21

- 00034

- CR

Appeal from the

394th District Court

of Culberson County, Texas

(TC# 5684)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the order of the court below and remand the case to the district

court for immediate further proceedings consistent with this opinion. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21 S T OF J ULY, 2021.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15330 and #15331; Seminole Tribe of Florida Disaster Number FL-00132]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the Seminole Tribe of Florida (FEMA-4341-DR), dated 09/27/2017. *Incident*: Hurricane Irma. *Incident Period*: 09/04/2017 and continuing.
 DATES: Issued on 09/27/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date*: 11/27/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date*: 06/27/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/27/2017, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Areas (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*
                     Seminole Tribe of Florida and associated lands. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Florida: Broward, Collier, Glades, Hendry, Hillsborough, Saint Lucie. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage*:Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.500Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.750Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.610Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury*:Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 153308 and for economic injury is 153310. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2017-21452 Filed 10-4-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60013 Summary Calendar

ADEL KASSAM JAMAL, Petitioner,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A78 602 435

-------------------- Before JOLLY, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Adel Kassam Jamal petitions this court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of relief. The IJ denied Jamal’s requests for asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), and voluntary departure. As a preliminary matter, we DENY the respondent’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. As the respondent concedes, Jamal’s petition for review, which was originally filed in theNo. 03-60013 -2- wrong court, was timely. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Accordingly, we have jurisdiction. Jamal has waived any challenge to the IJ’s determination that his asylum application was untimely by failing to brief the issue. See Rodriguez v. INS , 9 F.3d 408, 414 n.15 (5th Cir. 1993). He has also waived any challenge to the IJ’s denial of relief under the CAT, as well as to the IJ’s denial of voluntary departure, by failing to address these claims in his brief.
See id. The IJ’s denial of withholding of removal was based largely on a determination that Jamal’s testimony was not credible. Given the many inconsistencies in Jamal’s testimony noted by the IJ, we conclude that the IJ’s credibility finding is a reasonable interpretation of the record. See Chun v. INS , 40 F.3d 76, 79 (5th Cir. 1994). As Jamal has failed to point to any evidence, other than his testimony, which would support his claim, we conclude that the IJ’s determination that Jamal has not established an entitlement to withholding of removal was based on substantial evidence. See id.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED; MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED.