alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          44,739
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,541
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         326,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 360,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           223
<OTHER-SE>                                        (138)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   360,357
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,377
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,749
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,749
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,489
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 7


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Minefinders Corporation Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark H. Bailey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. February 23, 2012

   /s/ Mark H. BaileyMark H. BaileyChief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Minefinders Corporation Ltd. and will be retained by Minefinders Corporation Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21831]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: November 30-December 1, 2017.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel, 4300 Military Road, Washington, DC 
20015.
    Contact Person: Cathy J. Wedeen, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, OD, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS, 
6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01-G, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6878, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 4, 2017.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-21831 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3217 

To improve and provide increased access to the Railroad Rehabilitation and 

Improvement Financing program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 14, 2011 

Ms. BROWN of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To improve and provide increased access to the Railroad 

Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RAILROAD REHABILITATION AND IMPROVE4 MENT FINANCING. 

5 Section 502 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regu6 latory Reform Act of 1976 (45 U.S.C. 822) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (b)(1)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subpara9 graph (B); 


PWALKER on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3217 IH

1 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

2 subparagraph (C) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

4 subparagraph: 

5 ‘‘(D) carry out development phase activi6 ties, including planning, feasibility analysis, rev7 enue forecasting, environmental review, permit8 ting, preliminary engineering and design work, 

9 and other preconstruction activities.’’; 

10 (2) in subsection (e), by adding at the end of 

11 the following new paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(3) INTEREST RATE REDUCTION.—Subject to 

13 the availability of funds authorized by subsection 

14 (k), the Secretary may reduce the interest to be paid 

15 on direct loans provided to entities described in 

16 paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (a), for the 

17 sole purpose of installing a positive train control sys18 tem as defined in section 20157(i) of title 49, 

19 United States Code.’’; 

20 (3) in subsection (f)(1) by striking ‘‘under this 

21 section a’’ and inserting ‘‘under this section private 

22 insurance, including bond insurance, and any other’’; 

23 (4) in subsection (f)(3), by inserting ‘‘or, at the 

24 discretion of the Secretary, in a series of payments 

25 over the term of the loan. If insurance, including 


PWALKER on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3217 IH

1 bond insurance, is used, the policy premium shall be 

2 paid for before the loan is disbursed’’ after ‘‘of loan 

3 amounts’’; 

4 (5) in paragraph (3) of subsection (h) by— 

5 (A) striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara6 graph (A); 

7 (B) striking ‘‘guarantee.’’ at the end of 

8 subparagraph (B) and inserting ‘‘guarantee; 

9 and’’; and 

10 (C) inserting after subparagraph (B) the 

11 following new subparagraph: 

12 ‘‘(C) the grant requirements of section 

13 24405(a) of title 49, United States Code.’’; and 

14 (6) by adding at the end of the following new 

15 subsection: 

16 ‘‘(k) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

17 are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for pur18 poses of carrying out subsection (e)(3) such funds as may 

19 be necessary for the period encompassing fiscal years 2012 

20 through 2017.’’. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-120377, No.333-97537, No. 333-97533, No. 33-96582, No. 33-96580, No. 333-34509 and No.333-91591 of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation on Form S-8 of our reportdated March 27, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements ofCanterbury Park Holding Corporation which report expressed an unqualifiedopinion and included an explanatory paragraph relating to Canterbury ParkHolding Corporation’s change in method of accounting for stock-basedcompensation as discussed in Notes 1 and 5 appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation for the year ended December31, 2006.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Minneapolis, MinnesotaMarch 27, 2007

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6516

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CR-98-358-A)

Submitted: April 8, 2003 Decided: May 15, 2003

Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motions for reproduction of personal legal papers, for

information on a deported government witness, and for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Lora, No. CR-98-358-A (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 15, 2002 & entered

Feb. 19, 2002; Mar. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT      32 (a)**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1) | the                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended                December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15                U.S.C.                78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Dated:              April              16, 2007 |                                                                                           |                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |                                                                                           |
|                                             |                                                                                      |                                  |
|                                                  |                                                                                           | /s/ Csaba              Törő |
|                                                  | Name:              Csaba Törő                                                        |
|                                                  | Title:              Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial              Officer  |

----
#### Juan M. Mateo, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

[664 NYS2d 449]

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered November 22, 1995, which denied plaintiffs motion to file a late notice of claim, and order, same court and Justice, entered September 23, 1996, which granted plaintiffs motion to renew and reargue the prior order and thereupon adhered thereto, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks recovery for injuries suffered when the automobile he was driving, which was traveling the wrong way on 39th Street in Manhattan, was involved in a collision with a bus traveling northbound on 10th Avenue.

Plaintiff failed to provide an adequate excuse for the delay in moving for permission to file a notice of claim some seven months after the date of the accident on which the claim is based. Neither the police report prepared in connection with plaintiffs accident nor the published news reports regarding another accident that took place at or near the same location five months after plaintiffs accident made any mention of the signs or traffic lights at the intersection of 11th Avenue and 39th Street. Those reports could not possibly have served as notice that plaintiff would eventually claim that there was a casual connection between the allegedly negligent placement of those lights and signs and his injuries sustained in the accident at 39th Street and 10th Avenue.

In reference to plaintiffs motion to renew, since plaintiffs initial application for permission to file a late notice of claim was denied without leave to renew, the Statute of Limitations toll that runs from the time a plaintiff seeks leave to serve a late notice of claim until the order granting that relief goes into effect *(see, Giblin v Nassau County Med. Ctr.,*61 NY2d 67) was inapplicable to extend his time to move to renew *(see, Matter of Dominguez v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*178 AD2d 186). Nor does the motion to renew relate back to the original motion for Statute of Limitations purposes *(supra; Matter of Asaro v City of New York,*167 AD2d 130, *lv dismissed and denied*77 NY2d 956; *Matter of Rieara v City of N. Y. Dept. of Parks & Recreation,*156 AD2d 206, 207). The application was, therefore, untimely. To the extent that plaintiffs motion was for reargument, we find that the court properly adhered to its initial determination. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Colabella, JJ.
EXHIBIT 11


                           CLOSURE MEDICAL CORPORATION
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED                   SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                     JUNE 30,        JUNE 30,             JUNE 30,      JUNE 30,
                                                        1999            1998                 1999          1998
                                                        ----            ----                 ----          ----
<S>                                                     <C>            <C>                   <C>           <C>
Weighted average common shares
   outstanding for the period-  basic EPS               13,315         13,264                13,309        13,258
                                                  ------------    -----------          ------------  ------------
Effect of dilutive stock options (a)
                                                           569              -                     -             -
                                                  ------------    -----------          ------------  ------------
Weighted average common shares
   outstanding for the period- diluted EPS              13,884         13,264                13,309        13,258
                                                  ============    ===========          ============  ============
Net income (loss)                                $          15   $     (2,320)        $        (550) $     (4,276)
                                                  ============    ===========          ============  ============

Net income (loss) per share- basic               $        0.00   $      (0.17)        $       (0.04) $      (0.32)
                                                  ============    ===========          ============  ============

Net income (loss) per share- diluted             $        0.00   $      (0.17)        $       (0.04) $      (0.32)
                                                  ============    ===========          ============  ============
</TABLE>


(a) Options to purchase 1,216,694 shares of common stock were outstanding at the
quarter ended June 30, 1999 but were not included in the computation of diluted
EPS as their effect was anti-dilutive.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Hypolito RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40831

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 30, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hypolito Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ramirez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cm. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         112,254                  53,905
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  397,715                 280,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,065                  19,352
<INVENTORY>                                    286,638                 155,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                          61,522                  19,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,012,801                 544,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                        478,000                 138,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           359                     354
<OTHER-SE>                                     224,496                 186,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,012,801                 544,220
<SALES>                                        157,542                 130,346
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,000                 155,051
<CGS>                                           37,637                  34,738
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,014                  93,777
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,047                  32,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,160                   3,735
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,774                  10,794
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,005                  14,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,922                   5,445
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,083                   8,621
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    129                     518
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,954                   8,103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47<F1>                0.23<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47                    0.23
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>