alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10140]

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects to be exhibited in the galleries of the Department of Musical Instruments of The Metropolitan Museum of Art, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the aforesaid galleries of The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about March 1, 2018, until on or about September 30, 2022, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of the imported objects, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 11, 2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Alyson Grunder,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2017-20317 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Capital Planning Commission

          - 1 CFR Part 603

# AGENCY:

National Capital Planning Commission.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC or Commission) is correcting a final rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 20, 2017. The document issued New Privacy Act Regulations.                    

# DATES:

 Effective October 20, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Anne R. Schuyler, General Counsel and Chief FOIA Officer, 202-482-7223,                         *anne.schuyler@ncpc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 2017-19996 appearing on page 44044 in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Wednesday, September 20, 2017, the following corrections are made:                

§ 603.3

1. On page 44048, in the second column, the first of the two paragraphs designated (c)(3)(vii) is correctly redesignated as paragraph (c)(3)(vi). 

Dated: September 21, 2017.

Anne R. Schuyler,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2017-20609 Filed 9-26-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7520-01-P
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 21, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D23-435 & 3D23-1378

Lower Tribunal No. 21-23418

________________

Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company,

Appellant,

vs.

Jimaca Investments, LLC,

Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William 

Thomas, Judge.

Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., and Paulo R. Lima and Elizabeth K. 

Russo, for appellant.

Cassel & Cassel, P.A., and Michael A. Cassel (Hollywood), for 

appellee.

Before LINDSEY, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DIAL
CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          12,180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,732
<INVENTORY>                                    112,950
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               219,413
<PP&E>                                         231,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 833,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          195,495
<BONDS>                                        220,695
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           961
<OTHER-SE>                                     168,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   833,937
<SALES>                                        665,510
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               665,510
<CGS>                                          352,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  352,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,799
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,915
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,705
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,705
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        


</TABLE>
March 31, 2008

United States
Securities and Exchange Commission

Dear
Sirs/Mesdames:

Re: Minefinders
Corporation Ltd.

This letter is
being filed as the consent of Richard L. Nielsen, Ph.D. to being named in the Annual
Information Form of Minefinders Corporation Ltd. (the Company) dated  March
25, 2008 and to the inclusion by reference to the report entitled TECHNICAL REPORT
DOLORES GOLD-SILVER PROJECT, Chihuahua State, Mexico dated July 26, 2007 and
prepared in part by me  (the Report) and of extracts from or a summary of the
Report in the written disclosure contained in any other documents incorporated by
reference therein.

I hereby
confirm that I have read the written disclosure of the Report and extracts from or a
summary of the Report contained in the Annual Information  Form and have no reason to
believe that there are any misrepresentations in the Information contained therein that
(i) are derived from the Report, and (ii) are within  the knowledge of the undersigned as
a result of the services performed by the undersigned in connection with the Report.

I hereby
expressly consent to the filing of this consent with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Companys Form 40-F,  filed on March 31, 2008,
and any amendment thereto, and as part of a post-effective amendment to the Companys
Form F-10, to  incorporate the Companys Form F-10, filed March 31, 2008.

Sincerely,

Richard L.
Nielsen, Ph.D.

_______________________Richard L. Nielson, Ph.D.California Professional Geologist, #4405

Location:
Golden, Colorado Date: March 31, 2008
#### In the Matter of Vincent P. Cignarale, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District, Petitioner.

[987 NYS2d 276]

Order of disbarment entered.

Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ. (Filed May 28, 2014.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6147

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMIE LUBELL DIXON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-00305-CMC-1)

Submitted: May 21, 2024 Decided: May 24, 2024

Before WYNN and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamie Lubell Dixon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6147 Doc: 5 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Lubell Dixon appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a 

sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Upon review of the record, we 

conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that Dixon failed to 

satisfy the “extraordinary and compelling reasons” criteria for a sentence reduction 

established by U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.13(b)(6), p.s. (2023), and 

denying Dixon’s motion on that ground. See United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th 167, 172 

(4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

order. United States v. Dixon, No. 3:11-cr-00305-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 2024). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6147 Doc: 5 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOUND ON PAGES 2 AND 3 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE YEAR TO DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         404,051
<SECURITIES>                                    50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,356,203
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,440,692
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,346,989
<PP&E>                                       1,919,933
<DEPRECIATION>                                 517,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,748,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,165,534
<BONDS>                                        681,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,034
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,869,472
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,748,965
<SALES>                                      8,652,737
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,652,737
<CGS>                                        6,690,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,690,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,048,322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,719
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                973,201
<INCOME-TAX>                                   370,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            603,201
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   603,201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
#### Jack W. GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN GOLF CORPORATION; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-56769.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 4, 2011.

Jack W. Graham, Long Beach, CA, pro se.

Raymond Yoon Ho Kim, Esquire, Henry Chi-Jen Wang, Esquire, Reed Smith, LLP, Donald R. Brown, Esquire, Borchien Lai, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Randall Charles Fudge, Deputy City, Long Beach City Attorney’s Office, Long Beach, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jack W. Graham appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights and antitrust action challenging a policy that permits only American Golf Corporation (“AGC”) employees to teach golf at certain public golf courses. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Knievel v. ESPN,*393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir.2005), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Graham’s First Amendment claim because the golf courses are nonpublic fora and the policy is reasonable and viewpoint neutral. *See Perry Educ. Ass’n v. Perry Local Educators’ Ass’n,*460 U.S. 37, 46, 103 S.Ct. 948, 74 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983) (on public property that is not by tradition or designation a forum for public communication, the state may restrict speech so long as the restriction is reasonable and viewpoint neutral).

The district court properly dismissed Graham’s equal protection claim because he does not have a fundamental right to work as a golf instructor, and there is a *635rational basis for the policy. *See Madarang v. Bermudes,*889 F.2d 251, 258 (9th Cir.1990) (“[T]he right to pursue a calling is not a fundamental right for purposes of the Equal Protection Clause.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

The district court properly dismissed Graham’s Sherman Act claim because he failed to allege “a substantial effect on interstate commerce generated either by appellees’ general business activities or by the alleged antitrust violations themselves[.]” *Musick v. Burke,*913 F.2d 1390, 1395 (9th Cir.1990) (citation omitted) (purchase of out-of-state supplies and equipment insufficient to substantially effect interstate commerce).

Graham’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
---



Exhibit 15

|                                                                                |  |                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|                                                                                |  |                
|Professional in resources, mining, processing, construction and the environment |  | www.cam-llc.com





|                  |  |               
|----------------- |  | --------------
|CONSENT OF EXPERT |  | March 10, 2009



British Columbia Securities Commission

Alberta Securities Commission

Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission

Manitoba Securities Commission

Ontario Securities Commission

New Brunswick Securities Commission

Nova Scotia Securities Commission

Registrar of Securities, Prince Edward Island

Securities Commission of Newfoundland and Labrador

Registrar of Securities, Northwest Territories

Registrar of Securities, Nunavut

Registrar of Securities, Yukon

United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Re:    Annual Information Form dated March 10, 2009 (the Annual Information Form) of Minefinders Corporation Inc. (the Company).



We refer to our report entitled "Technical Report Dolores Gold-Silver Project, Chihuahua State, Mexico" dated July 26, 2007 (the "Report") as referenced in the Annual Information Form and documents incorporated by reference therein.



We hereby consent to the use of our firm name and our Report in the Annual Information Form and in documents incorporated by reference therein.



We confirm that we have read the Annual Information Form and we have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations that are derived from our Report referred to above or that are within our knowledge as a result of the services we performed in connection with such Report.



We consent to the filing of this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Companys Form 40-F dated March 10, 2009, and any amendment thereto,  including post-effective amendments and as part of a post-effective amendment to the Companys Form F-10, to incorporate the Companys Form 40-F dated March 10, 2009.



|                                             |                 
|-------------------------------------------- | ----------------
|Yours truly,
CHLUMSKY, ARMBRUST & MEYER, LLC
|                                            
|Per:   /s/ Kenneth L. Meyer                 
|Name:                                        | Kenneth L. Meyer
|Position:                                    | Principal       











|                                  | 
|--------------------------------- | 
|12600 W. Colfax Ave., Suite A-250 | 
|Lakewood, Colorado 80215          | 
|Telephone : (303) 716-1617        | 
|Fax : (303) 716-3386              | 

---
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-11111 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JASON WAYNE CHILDS, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-75-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jason Wayne Childs has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Childs has filed a response. The r e c o r d i s i nsufficiently developed to allow co n s i d e ration at this time of Childs’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on di r e c t a p peal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 16, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-11111 Document: 00511573804 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2011No. 10-11111

to develop the record on the merits of the allegatio n s . ” U n i t e d States v. Cantwel l , 4 7 0 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Childs’ s r esponse. We concur with

c oun s el’ s a s s e s sment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for app ell at e review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-11111 Document: 00511573804 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Juan Trevizo

, * From the 244th District

Court of Ector County,

Trial Court No. C

- 37,76 1

.

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 0014 5

- CR * May 16, 2013

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.