alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7538

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

IRA LEE DICKERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, District Judge.

(CR-91-36, CA-97-2809-4-12)

Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 15, 2001

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ira Lee Dickerson, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United

States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ira Lee Dickerson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. With respect to

Dickerson’s newly-presented claim on appeal that he was sentenced

in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we

recently held in United States v. Sanders, F.3d , 2001 WL

369719 (4th Cir. Apr. 13, 2001) (No. 00-6281), that the new rule

announced in Apprendi is not retroactively applicable to cases on

collateral review. Accordingly, we grant Dickerson’s motion to

amend his brief, but deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Dickerson, Nos. CR-91-36; CA-97-2809-4-12 (D.S.C. filed

Sept. 27, 2000; entered Sept. 28, 2000). We further deny Dickerson’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2853 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2853

To require the purchase of domestically made flags of the United States 
             of America for use by the Federal Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2009

Mr. Braley of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the purchase of domestically made flags of the United States 
             of America for use by the Federal Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``All-American Flag Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR PURCHASE OF DOMESTICALLY MADE UNITED STATES 
              FLAGS FOR USE BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

    Only such flags of the United States of America, regardless of 
size, that are 100 percent manufactured in the United States, from 
articles, materials, or supplies 100 percent of which are grown, 
produced, or manufactured in the United States, may be acquired for use 
by the Federal Government.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 2 shall apply to purchases of flags made on or after 180 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Letterhead of Stegman & Company]





                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Annual  Report (Form
10-KSB) of Cecil Bancorp,  Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated February 2,
2001, included in the 2000 Annual Report to Stockholders of Cecil Bancorp, Inc.

     We  also  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  Registration
Statements (Form 10-KSB Number 0-24926) of Cecil Bancorp,  Inc. and Subsidiaries
of our report dated February 2, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements incorporated herein by reference.

                                                           /s/ Stegman & Company




Baltimore, Maryland
March 26, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOUND ON PAGE 2 AND 3 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         398,516
<SECURITIES>                                 2,760,670
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,359,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,120,765
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,183,937
<PP&E>                                       2,998,320
<DEPRECIATION>                                 663,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,519,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,971,053
<BONDS>                                      5,715,819
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,057
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,782,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,519,080
<SALES>                                     16,287,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,287,812
<CGS>                                       12,354,266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,354,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,784,255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             278,969
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,131,467
<INCOME-TAX>                                   810,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,321,467
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,321,467
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .302<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .249<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Includes add back of after-tax effect of interest expense for convertible
    Debentures for 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


                  [LETTERHEAD OF SIMON MASTER & SIDLOW, P.A.]



BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS
CECIL BANCORP, INC.
ELKTON, MARYLAND



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-KSB) of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated January 27,
1999, included in the 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders of Cecil Bancorp, Inc.

     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statements (Form 10-KSB Number 0-24926) of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
of our report dated January 27, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements incorporated herein by reference.

                                              /s/ Simon Master & Sidlow, P.A.



Wilmington, Delaware
January 27, 1999
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
     I, Michael A. Pugh, Chief Financial Officer of Mitcham Industries, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify that the accompanying Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2005(the “Report”), filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereofpursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 fully complies with therequirements of that section.
     I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: June 8, 2005      /s/ Michael A. Pugh
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE UNAUDITED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 IN THE REPORT ON FORM
10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 OF BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS,
INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,327,807
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,353,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                       392,809
<INVENTORY>                                      3,171,255
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,989,173
<PP&E>                                           1,020,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                     304,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,931,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,257,860
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                             10
<COMMON>                                             5,557
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,582,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,931,557
<SALES>                                          6,261,896
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,261,896
<CGS>                                            4,061,882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,655,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    57,184
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (450,679)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (453,179)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.08)
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Wayne Washington, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[666 NYS2d 796]

Carpinello, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Substantial evidence supports the determination finding petitioner guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from refusing to follow a direct order, engaging in violent conduct and taking action intended to take over an area of the facility. The record reveals that on June 22, 1996, correction officers at Bare Hill Correctional Facility in Franklin County responded to a call on the M-2 housing unit to break up a fight between two inmates. Correction officers arrived on *915the unit, separated the two inmates and ordered petitioner and the other inmates in the area to return to their cubes. After one of the inmates who was involved in the fight was escorted outside of the housing unit, the correction officer who authored the misbehavior report observed petitioner and several other inmates attempt to follow the escort officers and the inmate outside by pushing on a door to get out while correction officers were attempting to lock it. Petitioner failed to obey an order to get away from the door and to return to his cube. We find that this testimony, along with the detailed misbehavior report, support the finding of guilt as to each charge.

We reject petitioner’s contention that he was denied due process because the Hearing Officer would not allow pictures of him taken five days after the incident described in the misbehavior report to be introduced into evidence. We agree with the Hearing Officer that these pictures, which were sought to show the injuries petitioner had allegedly sustained at the hands of correction officers following the incident, would have no relevance to the charges at issue *(see, Matter of Rowlett v Coombe,*242 AD2d 798). Furthermore, we find that petitioner was afforded a fair and impartial hearing and reject his claim of Hearing Officer bias. The Hearing Officer’s tangential involvement in this matter did not disqualify him from presiding over the hearing *(see,*7 NYCRR 254.1; *see also, Matter of Cowart v Coughlin,*193 AD2d 887, 887-888). In any event, petitioner has failed to demonstrate that any alleged bias affected the outcome of the hearing *(see, Matter of Rosa v Coombe,*238 AD2d 814, 815; *Matter of Nieves v Coughlin,*157 AD2d 943, 944). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                    
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         337,444
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,443,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,749,874
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,850,811
<PP&E>                                         964,598
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,854,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,029,525
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,140
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,404,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,854,567
<SALES>                                        2,108,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,108,454
<CGS>                                          1,590,259
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  578,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (782)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             26,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (86,041)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   22,155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (63,886)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (63,886)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.02)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 22


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


Board of Directors
Frederick Brewing Co.
Frederick, Maryland




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File numbers 333-65287, 333-54013, 333-51207,
333-35655, 333-25743) of Frederick Brewing Co. (the Company) of our report
dated March 30, 1998 relating to the financial statements of the Company as
of and for the year ended December 31, 1997, which appear in this Form 10-K.





                                          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




McLean, Virginia
July 2, 1999
Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter G. Michielutti, Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ PETER G. MICHIELUTTI  **Peter G. Michielutti,**  **Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,**  **Chief Operating Officer**   Date: September 7, 2005  
31
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael M. Searles, Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ MICHAEL M. SEARLES **Michael M. Searles,**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Anza Capital, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent Rinehart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  
 Dated: August 13, 2003
/s/ Vincent RinehartBy: Vincent RinehartIts: Chief Financial Officer 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Anza Capital, Inc. and will be retained by Anza Capital, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00408

- CV

DANA BISHOP v. VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS)

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 4 of Williamson County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 12

- 18 97

- CC4

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed as moot . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED AS MOOT in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged ag ainst appellant although she is exempt from payment due to her affidavit to inability to pay costs

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. January 16, 2014
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                       MEDIRISK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                               OF COMMON STOCK


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Year ended               Year ended              Year ended
                                                            December 31, 1996        December 31, 1995       December 31, 1996
                                                            -----------------        -----------------       -----------------
<S>                                                           <C>                     <C>                      <C>
Net loss attributable to common stock                         $(7,432,385)            $  (431,841)             $ (139,237)
                                                              -----------             -----------              ----------
Primary and fully diluted shares:
  Weighted average number of common
    shares outstanding                                            487,651                 612,491                 612,426
  Mandatory conversion of Series A and
    Series B convertible preferred stock                        1,021,809               1,021,809               1,021,809
  "Cheap Stock" issued during the
    12 months prior to filing of registration
    statement as defined in SEC SAB No. 83                        577,427                 577,427                 577,427
                                                              -----------             -----------              ----------
                                                                2,086,887               2,211,727               2,211,662
                                                               ----------             -----------              ----------
Net loss per share of
  common stock                                                $     (3.56)            $      (.20)             $     (.06)
                                                              -----------             -----------              ----------

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Total Identity Corp. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Matthew P. Dwyer, CEO and CFO of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








September
                21, 2006
            
            
            By:/s/ Matthew P. DwyerMatthew
                P. Dwyer, CEO, CFO, President, principal executive officer and principal
                financial and accounting officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.