alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY

#### Sherman W. Pratt v. Ellen Bozman et al.

December 1977

Case No. (Law) 19786

By JUDGE WILLIAM L. WINSTON,

JUDGE ARTHUR W. SINCLAIR, and

JUDGE J. M. H. WILLIS, JR.

At the time the Respondent Ellen Bozman became a candidate for and was elected to the County Board she Was in compliance with Sec. 24.1-167, Code, i.e., she was qualified to vote for and to hold the office she was seeking.

Sec. 15.1-50, Code, is a restriction on dual office holding enacted pursuant to Art. II, Sec. 5, of the Constitution of Virginia, the same provision which states the constitutional requirement for qualifying to hold public office, i.e., being a resident of the Commonwealth for one year and qualified to vote for that office.

Sec. 15.1-50 should not be interpreted to restrict the provisions of sec. 24.1-167. It is not incorporated in it by reference either explicitly or by implication. It would appear that it, i.e., Sec. 15.1-50, Code, becomes effective only when a successful candidate in an election seeks to qualify for or assume that office while still holding a prior office prohibited under the statute.

For the foregoing reasons, the Complaint is dismissed with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3246 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 379
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3246

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2011

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             April 25, 2012

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 15455 Manchester Road in Ballwin, Missouri, as the ``Specialist 
                Peter J. Navarro Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST PETER J. NAVARRO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 15455 Manchester Road in Ballwin, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Specialist Peter J. Navarro Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Peter J. Navarro Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 379

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3246

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 15455 Manchester Road in Ballwin, Missouri, as the ``Specialist 
                Peter J. Navarro Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 25, 2012

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Stilwell Value Partners, IV L.P., Respondent, v Diane B. Cavanaugh et al., Appellants, and Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc., Nominal Defendant-Appellant.

[987 NYS2d 149]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered on or about October 23, 2013, which, in a derivative action, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff sufficiently alleged with the requisite detail that defendant directors, who sit on the boards of both the defendant parent company, Northeast Community Bancorp, MHC, and its subsidiary, nominal defendant Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc., have a conflict of interest regarding plaintiff’s proposed transaction, based on, inter alia, their dual loyalties and self-interest *(see generally Bansbach v Zinn,*1 NY3d 1, 11 [2003]; *Marx v Akers,*88 NY2d 189, 200 [1996]). Contrary to defendants’ contention, self-interest is not limited to a direct financial interest. Affording the pleading the benefit of every favorable inference *(see Simkin v Blank,*19 NY3d 46, 52 [2012]), it also sufficiently alleges that the directors breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty and due care and failed to act in good faith by either failing to adequately consider or to undertake plaintiffs demand to add disinterested directors to Northeast’s board or *519
      *engage*in a two step conversion of its structure *(see Auerbach v*Bennett, 47 NY2d 619, 629-631 [1979]; *534 E. 11th St. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. v Hendrick,*90 AD3d 541, 542 [1st Dept 2011]).

Plaintiff also sufficiently alleges that MHC, as Northeast’s majority shareholder, breached its fiduciary duty to the minority (see *Alpert v 28 Williams St. Corp.,*63 NY2d 557, 569 [1984]), and aided and abetted the directors’ alleged breach by knowingly providing substantial assistance in refusing to act when under a duty to do so *(see Kaufman v Cohen,*307 AD2d 113, 125-126 [1st Dept 2003]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Acosta, J.P, DeGrasse, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,225<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    111,181
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,377
<PP&E>                                         234,168<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 578,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,434
<BONDS>                                        342,568
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,609
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   578,683
<SALES>                                        676,242
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               676,242
<CGS>                                          599,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,944
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (46,974)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,051
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (53,025)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     440
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (52,585)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNTS PRESENTED ARE NET
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                         Service Systems International, Ltd.
                           Computation of Per-Share Income
                                Treasury Stock Method
                               As Modified for 20% Test



                                               PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1997
                                                        THREE MONTHS




Weighted average number of shares outstanding          5,354,644
                                                      ----------

Total common and common equivalent shares              5,354,644
                                                      ----------
                                                      ----------

Net income (loss) for the period                     $  (432,329)
                                                      ----------
                                                      ----------



Total common and common equivalent shares              5,354,644
                                                      ----------
                                                      ----------

Loss per common and common equivalent shares         $    ( 0.08)
                                                      ----------
                                                      ----------






Earnings per share:

The earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the
period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Common stock equivalents are excluded from the computation if their
effect would be anti-dilutive.
#### UTICA FIRE-ALARM TEL. CO. et al. v. MUNICIPAL FIRE & POLICE TEL. CO. et al.

(Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts.

June 12, 1895.)

No. 381.

Patents—Tnfrinoement—Fire-Alarm Boxes.

The Palmer patent:, No. 220,088, for an improvement in noninterfering fire-alarm boxes, cannot;, in view of the prior art, as shown particularly in the Pond and Chester patents, Nos. 188,182 and 1(11,425, respectively, be construed as extending to all mechanism which performs the main functions effected by the devices described in claims *4*and 5.

This was n bill in equity by the Utica Fire-Alarm Telegraph Company and others against the Municipal Fire & Police Telegraph Company and others for infringement of a patent relating to fire-alarm boxes.

Richard H. Dyer, for complainants.

James J. Storrow, Jr., and Frederick P. Fish, for respondents.

CARPENTER, District Judge.

This is a bill in equity to restrain an alleged infringement of letters patent No. 220,088, issued September 30, 1879, to Augustus II. Palmer, for improvement in uoninterfering fire-alarm boxes. The claims alleged to be infringed are as follows:

> *“4.*In combination with the carriage, *A,*the spring-barrel, spring, and pinlevor, p, rod, r, and armature, s, whereby the armature is positively raised and held to the magnet until the circuit is renewed, substantially as set forth.

> “5. In combination with'the rectangle-bar, U, and bent rod, 1, the rod, m, thumbscrew and jam-nut, 55, and armature, s, whereby the rectangle-bar is held from engagement, with the signal-rack, and a positive noninterference obtained with all the other boxes of the circuit, substantially as shown and described, and for the purposes sot forth.”

The device employed by the respondents can be held to infringe this patent only by construing the two claims here in controversy to cover all mechanism which perforins the main functions performed by the devices described in those two claims. Shortly stated, these are as follows: The device covered by the fifth claim causes the armature of the noninterfering mechanism to fall entirely out of the field of influence of the magnet which holds it in the normal position of the apparatus, while the device covered by the fourth claim mechanically replaces the armature within the same field of influence, by the automatic action of the motor mechanism which drives the system as a whole. These main functions, however, are performed in the mechanism shown in several earlier patents. 1 refer particularly, with respect to the fifth claim, to the patents to Pond, No. 188,182, and to Chester, No. 104,425, and, with respect to the fourth claim, to the Chester patent, above named. I therefore conclude that the respondents do not infringe, and that the bill must be dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax Credit
Fund II,  L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  for the year ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Thomas J. Riha, Chief Financial  Officer of
WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

               1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                    operations of the Partnership.


/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Date: July 14, 2004


                                       65
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

BRACCO DIAGNOSTICS I NC., Appellant

v.

JUBILANT DRAXIMAGE I NC., Appellee

______________________

2020

- 1696, 2020

- 1697, 2020

- 1698

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No s . IPR2018

- 01448, IPR2018

- 01449, IPR2018

- 01450.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J ULIE P AMELA B OOKBINDER

, Greenberg Traurig LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by
S COTT J OSEPH B ORNSTEIN ; H EATH B RIGGS , Denver, CO;

B ARRY S CHINDLER , Florham Park, NJ.

R OBERT L OUIS H AILS

, J R

., Baker & Hostetler LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by

T. C Y W ALKER ; T HERESA W EISENBERGER , Atlanta, GA.

______________________ Case: 20-1696 Document: 42 Page: 1 Filed: 05/06/2021T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE

, M OORE

, and O’M ALLEY

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 6, 2021
Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 20-1696 Document: 42 Page: 2 Filed: 05/06/2021
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8) pertaining to (i) theAmended and Restated 1996 Equity Participation Plan of Varco International, Inc. (No. 333-38064), (ii) the D.O.S. Ltd. 1993 Stock Option Plan (No. 333-05237), (iii) the Tuboscope Vetco International Inc. 401(k) Thrift Savings Plan (No. 333-43385),(iv) the Tuboscope Inc. Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan (No. 333-56039), (v) the Tuboscope Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (No. 333-56041), (vi) the Varco 1980 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Varco International, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Planand the Varco International, Inc. 1994 Directors’ Stock Option Plan (No. 333-38066), (vii) Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (333-72072), (viii) Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Key Employees and Directors (333-72150) and(ix) Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Key Employees of Tuboscope Vetco International Corporation (No. 333-35179) of Varco International, Inc. of our report dated January 30, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, asamended, and schedules of Varco International, Inc. included in this Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Houston, Texas 

May 21, 2003
EXHIBIT
23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Community First Bankshares, Inc. of our report
dated January 20, 2000, included in the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders of Community First Bankshares, Inc.

We
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements and related Prospectuses of Community First Bankshares, Inc. of our report dated
January 20, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Community First Bankshares, Inc. incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1999.

|Form |  | Registration Statement No. |  | Purpose                                                                                 
|---- |  | -------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|S-8  |  | 33-44921                   |  | 1987 Stock Option Plan                                                                  
|S-8  |  | 33-48160                   |  | 401(k) Retirement Plan                                                                  
|S-8  |  | 333-52071                  |  | 1996 Stock Option and 401(k) Plans                                                      
|S-8  |  | 333-74909                  |  | Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
|S-3  |  | 333-37527                  |  | Registration of $150,000,000 of Common Stock, Preferred Stock and Debt Securities       
|S-4  |  | 333-40071                  |  | Shelf registration of 4,438,207 shares of Common Stock                                  
|S-4  |  | 333-49367                  |  | Shelf registration of 7,000,000 shares of Common Stock                                  



Minneapolis,
Minnesota
March 21, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2608 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2608

 To define marriage for all legal purposes in the District of Columbia 
           to consist of the union of one man and one woman.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2009

     Mr. Jordan of Ohio (for himself, Mr. Boren, Mr. Bartlett, Mr. 
 Alexander, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Cantor, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Cole, 
    Mr. Conaway, Ms. Fallin, Mr. Fleming, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Franks of 
Arizona, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Herger, Mr. Jones, 
 Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Kline of Minnesota, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Latta, Mr. 
 Luetkemeyer, Mr. Marchant, Mr. McHenry, Mr. McIntyre, Mr. Neugebauer, 
 Mr. Rogers of Kentucky, Mr. Scalise, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Tiahrt, 
 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Price of Georgia, Mr. Boozman, and 
  Mr. Pence) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To define marriage for all legal purposes in the District of Columbia 
           to consist of the union of one man and one woman.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That in the District of 
Columbia, for all legal purposes, ``marriage'' means the union of one 
man and one woman.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3319 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 487
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3319

                          [Report No. 112-675]

   To allow the Pascua Yaqui Tribe to determine the requirements for 
                       membership in that tribe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 2, 2011

 Mr. Grijalva introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

                           September 18, 2012

                     Additional sponsor: Mr. Gosar

                           September 18, 2012

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
    [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on 
                           November 2, 2011]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To allow the Pascua Yaqui Tribe to determine the requirements for 
                       membership in that tribe.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERSHIP DETERMINED BY TRIBE.

    Section 3 of Public Law 95-375 (25 U.S.C. 1300f-2) is amended to 
read as follows:
    ``Sec. 3.  For the purposes of section 1 of this Act, membership of 
the Pascua Yaqui Tribe shall consist of any United States citizen of 
Pascua Yaqui blood enrolled by the tribe.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 487

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3319

                          [Report No. 112-675]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To allow the Pascua Yaqui Tribe to determine the requirements for 
                       membership in that tribe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 18, 2012

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
                           TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
                     COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE(1)
                      (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Years Ended June 30,
                                                          ---------------------------
                                                            1997      1996      1995
                                                          -------   -------   -------
<S>                                                       <C>       <C>       <C>    
Net income                                                $15,340   $16,860   $ 8,011
                                                          -------   -------   -------
Weighted average shares outstanding:
     Common Stock                                          12,970    12,255    11,678
Weighted average incremental common stock equivalents    
     from dilutive options and warrants(2)                  1,097     1,168     1,485
                                                          -------   -------   -------
Weighted average common stock shares and equivalents       14,067    13,423    13,163
                                                          -------   -------   -------
                                                          $  1.09   $  1.26   $  0.61
                                                          -------   -------   -------
</TABLE>

(1)      This Exhibit should be read in conjunction with Note 1 of Notes to
         Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)      Computed using the treasury stock method.



                                       44