alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND> 
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED   CONSOLIDATED   FINANCIAL   STATEMENTS  WHICH  ARE  INCLUDED  IN  THE
REGISTRANT'S  FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001016439
<NAME>                        Intelligroup, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         4,245
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  34,675
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,053)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               53,714
<PP&E>                                         12,296
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,790)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 69,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          21,073
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       154
<OTHER-SE>                                     47,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   69,565
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 99.9

KPMG LLP
     Telephone   (604) 691-3000Chartered Accountants
     Fax                (604) 691-3031PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street
     Internet        www.kpmg.caVancouver BC V7Y 1K3Canada
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors 
Minefinders Corporation Ltd. We consent to the inclusion in this this annual report on Form 40-F of: our auditors Report dated February 25, 2010 on the consolidated balance sheets of Minefinders Corporation Ltd. (the Company) as at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2009;our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 25, 2010 on the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.  //s// KPMG LLP Chartered Accountants Vancouver, Canada 
March 1, 2010 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership is the Canadian
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.


---
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21533]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE


Depository Library Council to the Director; Meeting

    The Depository Library Council (DLC) to the Director, Government 
Publishing Office (GPO) will meet on Monday, October 16, 2017 through 
Wednesday, October 18, 2017 in Arlington, Virginia. The sessions will 
take place from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday and Tuesday and 8:00 a.m. 
to 12:30 p.m., on Wednesday. The meeting will be held at the Doubletree 
Hotel, 300 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, Virginia. The purpose of this 
meeting is to discuss the Federal Depository Library Program. All 
sessions are open to the public. The United States Government 
Publishing Office is in compliance with the requirements of Title III 
of the Americans with Disabilities Act and meets all Fire Safety Act 
regulations.

Davita Vance-Cooks,
Director, Government Publishing Office.
[FR Doc. 2017-21533 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1520-01-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3306 

To repeal the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing loan program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2011 

Mr. FLORES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing 

loan program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLE MANUFAC4 TURING LOAN PROGRAM. 

5 (a) REPEAL.—Section 136(d) of the Energy Inde6 pendence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17103(d)) 

7 is repealed. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect 

9 on the date of its enactment. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of C&G DEC Capital, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard H. Tanenbaum, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Richard H. Tanenbaum
-----------------------------
Richard H. Tanenbaum
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

April 14, 2008
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

#### James Gerwin, etc., et al. v. Burton A. Moss

May 22, 1984

Case No. L-424

By JUDGE H. CALVIN SPAIN

On May 18, 1984, a hearing was held concerning the objections of the defendant, Burton A. Moss, to answering Interrogatories numbers 4 and 7, previously filed in this matter. At that time, each of you gentlemen supplied the undersigned with voluminous citations concerning the law.

A review of the cases that were cited reflect that the singular subject matter addressed was the matter of a medical standard of care and the compliance of a defendant with respect to such standard of care. As pointed out, there is a split in authority on the subject and the Supreme Court of Virginia has not ruled.

Insofar as this case is concerned, the Court has decided that it will permit an interrogatory that does inquire as to what the standard of care would have been under the circumstances, and whether the defendant did in fact comply with that standard of care. The court will not permit any opinion to be rendered which would call upon the defendant to render an expert opinion as to the conduct of the other professionals who would, almost of necessity, become parties defendant in this matter.

With respect to Interrogatory number 4, the court would permit the answering of Interrogatory number 4 through the first two and three-quarters lines as presently typed. In other words, the sentence would end with the *114word "Gerwin." All other matters after it would not be permitted and the objection, therefore, in part sustained.

With respect to Interrogatory number 7, the Interrogatory would be permitted so long as it did not call for the defendant’s opinion. If rephrased to ask [for] factual information that will be the defenses raised as factual contentions by the defendant, then, the court has no problem with respect to the question. As written, however, the objection is sustained.

While this letter may cause you some confusion, I will try to again clarify the Court’s position. Essentially it is that a defendant physician may be called upon to give his expert opinion as to the standard of care in a particular community for a particular subject, and he may be required to answer whether he in fact adhered to that standard of care. That is basically as far as the Court is going to go without specific questions in mind. I have given you this information in hopes that the two interrogatories to which objections were filed may now be amended to allow the intent in each case to be clearly set forth, and to further provide you with an answer to the standard of care question. Specifically, the standard of care question has not been set forth in number 4 or number 7, but reference was made by inuendo.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
   
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,110,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (355,864)
<INVENTORY>                                 15,323,763
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,176,331
<PP&E>                                       6,718,996
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,002,408)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,717,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,866,002
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    25,711,782
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,838,119)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                58,717,669
<SALES>                                     35,132,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,578,808
<CGS>                                       12,646,067
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,646,067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,784,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,261,290
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (113,427) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (15,500)  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (97,927) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (97,927)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        
    

</TABLE>
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

RE: APPOINTMENT TO JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD : : : No. 675 SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET
**O R D E R**
**PER CURIA M:** 

AND NOW , this 21 st day of August , 201 5 , t he Honorable P. Kevin Brobson , Dauphin County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Judicial Conduct Board for a term of four years commencing August 31, 2015

.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax Credit
Fund II,  L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  for the year ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper,  Jr., President and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

               1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                    operations of the Partnership.


/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Date: July 14, 2004
Exhibit
10.11




Tri-party
Creditor's Right Transfer Agreement
  
 Party A:
Beijing ZYTX Technology Co., Ltd
  Party B:
Beijing Ying Tong Ji Xun Science & Technology Development
Co. Ltd
  Party C:
Beijing San Teng Da Fei Technology Development Co. Ltd
 
 Whereas:
  From July 17,
2009 to December 1, 2009, Party A and Party B signed three purchase contracts
for a product of wireless internet (including supplementary agreements),
according to provisions of contracts, Party A purchased 70,000 sets of wireless
internet terminal.  Up to now, Party A has made advance payment
amounting to RMB 139,700,000 in total to Party B, such advance payment has
actually formed creditor’s rights of Party A to Party B (the “Creditor’s
Rights”).
  On the
principle of mutual benefit and reciprocity, through amicable negotiation by
Party A, B, and C, Party A and B agree to transfer part of the Creditor’s Rights
to Party C.  Party C, agree to accept such part of the Creditor’s
Rights.  According to Contract Law of the People's
Republic of China and Company Law of the Peoples Republic
of China and other related laws and regulations, the following agreement
is reached on transfer of the Creditor’s Rights for jointly complying
with.
  Article
1 Transfer of object
  Party A
agrees to transfer part of the Creditor’s Rights amounting to RMB 72,400,000 to
Party C, which involves 36,200 sets of wireless internet terminal, and Party C
agree to accept such Creditor’s Rights.
  
  Article
2 Transfer price
  Party A, and
Party C agree transfer price of Creditor’s Rights is RMB
72,400,000.
  Article
3 Other provisions
  1. Any
amendment and supplementation made herein shall be in writing and legally signed
and sealed by each party.
  2. Any
dispute arising from performance of this agreement shall be settled through
amicable negotiation, if negotiation fails, either party shall be entitled to
institute legal proceedings before People’s Court with
jurisdiction.
  3. This
agreement is made in triplicate, one copy for Party A, B, and C, respectively,
with equal force.
  4. This
agreement comes into force upon signed by each party.
   (No text below)
   Party A
(official seal):  Beijing ZYTX Technology Co.,
Ltd
 /s/
 Signing
time: June 29, 2010
  Party B
(official seal): Beijing Ying Tong Ji Xun Science & Technology Development
Co. Ltd
 /s/
 Signing
time: June 29, 2010
  Party C
(official seal): Beijing San Teng Da Fei Technology Development Co.
Ltd
 /s/
 Signing
time: June 29, 2010
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2655 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand and extend the 

first-time homebuyer credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2009 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Ms. 

CLARKE, and Mr. DAVIS of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

and extend the first-time homebuyer credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION AND EXTENSION OF FIRST-TIME 

4 HOMEBUYER CREDIT. 

5 (a) CREDIT ALLOWED TO ALL HOMEBUYERS.—Sub6 section (a) of section 36 of the Internal Revenue Code of 

7 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘who is a first-time home8 buyer of a principal residence’’ and inserting ‘‘who pur9 chases a principal residence’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2655 IH

1 (b) CREDIT EXTENDED.—Subsection (h) of section 

2 36 of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘December 1, 

3 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2011’’. 

4 (c) EXTENSION OF WAIVER OF RECAPTURE.—Sub5 paragraph (D) of section 36(f)(4) of such Code is amend6 ed by striking ‘‘December 31, 2008, and before December 

7 1, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘April 8, 2008, and before Janu8 ary 1, 2011’’. 

9 (d) ELECTION TO TREAT PURCHASE IN PRIOR

10 YEAR.—Subsection (g) of such Code is amended to read 

11 as follows: 

12 ‘‘(g) ELECTION TO TREAT PURCHASE IN PRIOR

13 YEAR.—For purposes of this section (other than sub14 sections (c) and (f)(4)(D)), a taxpayer may elect to treat 

15 a purchase of a principal residence— 

16 ‘‘(1) after December 31, 2008, and before Jan17 uary 1, 2010, as made on December 31, 2008, and 

18 ‘‘(2) after December 31, 2009, and before Jan19 uary 1, 2011, as made on December 31, 2008, or 

20 December 31, 2009.’’. 

21 (e) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

22 (1) Subsection (c) of section 36 of such Code 

23 is amended by striking paragraph (1) and by redes24 ignating paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and (5) as para25 graphs (1), (2), (3), and (4), respectively. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2655 IH

1 (2) Section 36 of such Code is amended by 

2 striking ‘‘FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER CREDIT’’ in 

3 the heading and inserting ‘‘HOME PURCHASE

4 CREDIT’’. 

5 (3) The table of sections for subpart C of part 

6 IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code is 

7 amended by striking the item relating to section 36 

8 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 36. Home purchase credit.’’. 

9 (4) Subparagraph (W) of section 26(b)(2) of 

10 such Code is amended by striking ‘‘homebuyer cred11 it’’ and inserting ‘‘home purchase credit’’. 

12 (f) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

14 of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-83-2017]

On June 1, 2017, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Sacramento-Yolo Port District, grantee of FTZ 143, requesting an expansion of Subzone 143D, subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 143, on behalf of Mitsubishi Chemical Carbon Fiber and Composites, Inc., in Sacramento, California.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (82 FR 28628, June 23, 2017). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to expand Subzone 143D was approved on September 13, 2017, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 143's 2,000-acre activation limit.                

Dated: September 22, 2017.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-20819 Filed 9-27-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,047
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,043
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,557
<PP&E>                                          36,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,656
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           195
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,269
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,046
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,023
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,680)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,219)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,219)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maximo Sanchez, Appellant.

[859 NYS2d 891]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), imposed September 12, 2006, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed. No opinion. Rivera, J.P, Ritter, Covello and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 2, 2016

NO. 03-16-00014-CR

Troy Blanchard, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying an application for pre-trial writ of habeas 

corpus. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was 

no reversible error in the trial court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order 

denying the application for pre-trial writ of habeas corpus. Because appellant is indigent and 

unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.