alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shaaban Hafiz Ahmad Ali SHAABAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-2801.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

April 24, 2008.*

*

 This opinion is being released initially in typescript form.

APPELLANT COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND TO ALLOW MR. SHAABAN TO PROCEED PRO SE

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge (in chambers).

Counsel for Shaaban Hafiz Ahmad Ali Shaaban seeks leave to withdraw as appointed counsel for Mr. Shaaban and asks that I permit Mr. Shaaban to proceed pro se. On January 28, 2008, I appointed new counsel for Mr. Shaaban after concluding *681that the record raised substantial doubt that his previously appointed counsel had fulfilled adequately his obligations under the Seventh Circuit Criminal Justice Act Plan, § V.3. *United States v. Shaaban,*514 F.3d 697, 698-99 (7th Cir.2008) (Ripple, J., in chambers). I directed that new counsel file either a petition for rehearing or a motion to withdraw on the ground that any such petition would be frivolous. *Id.*at 699. On February 7, 2008, the court appointed Chief Federal Defender Richard H. Parsons in Peoria, Illinois, and Staff Attorney Andrew J. McGowan of that office was assigned to the case.

Attorney McGowan now represents that he has identified a non-frivolous issue that could be raised in the petition for rehearing, but he further notes that there are possible negative consequences to raising that issue. Mr. Shaaban has informed Mr. McGowan that he does not want this issue to be raised. Instead, Mr. Shaaban has prepared a pro se petition for rehearing that raises the issues that Mr. Shaaban wants to be raised. He attempted to file his pro se petition with the court, but the Clerk properly rejected the pro se petition because Mr. Shaaban was represented by counsel. As a result of the disagreement regarding how to proceed, counsel believes that there has been a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship and moves to withdraw.

Counsel was directed to file either a petition for rehearing or a motion to withdraw because such a petition would be frivolous. *Shaaban,*514 F.3d at 699. Attorney McGowan explains that he cannot represent that a petition for rehearing would be frivolous because the issue he has identified could have possible beneficial consequences, as well as possible negative consequences. Mr. Shaaban, however, does not want this issue to be raised. I must conclude that counsel has attempted to comply with the court’s directive, but that Mr. Shaaban would prefer to file a pro se petition for rehearing raising the issues that he believes should be raised. Accordingly, I grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and permit Mr. Shaaban to file a pro se petition for rehearing within 30 days.

IT IS SO ORDERED
EXHIBIT 32



                                  CERTIFICATION

By signing below, each of the undersigned  officers hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge,  (i) this report fully complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of River
Valley Bancorp.

Signed this 15th day of November 2004.



/s/ Matthew P. Forrester                   /s/ Larry C. Fouse
-------------------------------------      -------------------------------------
Matthew P. Forrester                       Larry C. Fouse
President and Chief Executive Officer      Vice President of Finance




A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to City Savings Financial Corporation
and will be retained by City Savings Financial  Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MANUEL ALEJANDRO VALMANA,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00084-CR

Appeal from the

210th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20170D04663)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s fourth motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until April 25, 2019. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. James D. Lucas, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 25, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16

th day of April, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     7
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
     1997 Annual Report for Aetna Insurance Company of America on Form 10-K
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000925988
<NAME>                        Aetna Insurance Company of America
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     137,918
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     0
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                           137,918
<CASH>                                    12,494
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                    45,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           880,542
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                    145,626
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   2,550
<OTHER-SE>                                49,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             880,542
<PREMIUMS>                                     0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                        7,083
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           102
<OTHER-INCOME>                               243
<BENEFITS>                                 6,535
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            2,482
<INCOME-TAX>                                 769
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        1,713
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                    520
<NET-INCOME>                               1,193
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0



</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-19-00218-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE REBA ANN JOHNSON AND D.L. JOHNSON

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

Relators Reba Ann Johnson and D.L. Johnson filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

with a request for emergency relief in the above cause on May 7, 2019. Through this 

original proceeding, relators contend that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing 

discovery to proceed prior to the resolution of a pending motion to dismiss filed under the 

Texas Citizens Participation Act while relators are without counsel. Relators seek to stay 

all trial court proceedings pending resolution of their petition for writ of mandamus. Real 

party in interest, Highway Barricades and Services, LLC, has filed a response and a 

supplemental response to relators’ request for emergency relief.
2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the relators’ request for 

emergency relief and the response thereto, is of the opinion that the request should be 

granted in part and denied in part. The request for emergency relief is GRANTED and 

discovery in this case is ordered STAYED pending further order of this Court, or until the 

case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an 

order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”). The request 

is DENIED insofar as all other pending matters, including those pertaining to the 

withdrawal and substitution of counsel, are not STAYED.

The Court requests that the real party in interest, Highway Barricades and 

Services, LLC, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, 

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of seven 

days from the date of this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

7th day of May, 2019.
#### THE MANHANSET. BACCUS v. THE MANHANSET et al.

(District Court, S. D. New York.

June 6, 1895.)

Shipping—Injury to Stevedore—Negligence of Officer.

A stevedore’s laborer working in tlie hold cannot recover against the ship for injuries occasioned by the fall of one of its officers upon him, through carelessness in walking upon an unguarded beam while in the discharge of his duties.

This was a libel by Rosario Baceus against the steamship Manlianset (Francis Duck, claimant), impleaded with Charles Hogan and others, respondents.

The libel was for injuries sustained by a stevedore’s laborer, occasioned by the mate of the steamship falling down on him from an orlop deck beam. There was no flooring on the orlop beams, which were about 10 inches wide. In the course of his duties the mate was walking across one of the beams and testified he was in the exercise of care. Libelant’s evidence was that the mate was in liquor. The mate lost his balance, and falling on the hack of libelant, who was slinging tin, crushed Mm to the fioor, damaging his kneecap.

Francis L. Oorrao, for libelant.

Oonvers & Kiriin, for claimant.

BROWN, District; Judge».

There is not sufficient evidence of any negligence in the duties of tin; ship. Libelant’s injury arose from the personal carelessness and fault of the officer in walking along the beam. I find no case in which a ship has been held for such a secondary result from the fall of a careless officer or member of the crew.

Libel dismissed, without costs.
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Mitchell K. Dauerman, Chief Financial Officer of The Ultimate Software Group,
Inc., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
that the information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.








/s/ Mitchell K. DauermanMitchell
      K. DauermanChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      10, 2010
CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY

#### Parks v. Parks

January 29, 1979

Case No. (Chancery) 29028

By JUDGE CHARLES H. DUFF

I have carefully examined Complainant’s Motion for Leave to File Late Exceptions to the Commissioner’s Report, as well as the cross "Motion to Deny" filed by Defendant. It is my opinion that § 8.01-615 is mandatory and requires the filing of exceptions to the Commissioner’s report within ten days after the report has been filed with the Court.

The general authority of Rule 1:9 allowing the Court to extend time for filing pleading is, in my opinion, not applicable to Exceptions. Pleadings are defined as the allegations made by the parties for the purpose of definitely presenting the issue to be tried and determined between them. See *Burch*v. *Grace Street Building Corporation,*168 Va. 329; also 14B M.J. 167.

I would suggest that Mr. Foley prepare a separate Order denying leave to file Exceptions late and preserving his exceptions to this ruling.
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED**

**PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-128012) pertaining to the Amended 2005 Equity Incentive Plan of Torrent Energy Corporation of our report dated June 3, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements  of Torrent Energy Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended March 31, 2006.

 

 

 

 
| Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada | /s/“*Ernst & Young LLP”* |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| July 14, 2006                       | Chartered Accountants                  |  
 

 

 

 

 
	- 2 - |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4321-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Nebraska (FEMA-4321-DR), dated June 26, 2017, and related determinations.

# DATES:

The amendment was issued on September 8, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Emergency Management Agency                           ( print page 44649)                        (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Michael R. Scott, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.                

This action terminates the appointment of Dolph A. Diemont as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-20452 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2673 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2673

To amend title 38, United States Code, to match the pension amount paid 
 to surviving spouses of veterans who served during a period of war to 
               the pension amount paid to such veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2009

Mr. DeFazio (for himself and Mr. Berry) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to match the pension amount paid 
 to surviving spouses of veterans who served during a period of war to 
               the pension amount paid to such veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MATCH OF PENSION AMOUNTS FOR SURVIVING SPOUSES.

    Section 1541 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by striking ``at the annual rate of 
        $2,379'' and inserting ``at the annual rate in effect under 
        section 1521(b) of this title'';
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``at the annual rate of 
        $3,116'' and inserting ``at the annual rate in effect under 
        section 1521(c) of this title'';
            (3) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``shall be 
                $3,806'' and inserting ``shall be at the annual rate in 
                effect under section 1521(d)(1) of this title''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``shall be 
                $4,543'' and inserting ``shall be at the annual rate in 
                effect under section 1521(d)(2) of this title''; and
            (4) in subsection (e)(1)--
                    (A) by striking ``shall be $2,908'' and inserting 
                ``shall be at the annual rate in effect under section 
                1521(e) of this title for a veteran who is similarly 
                situated''; and
                    (B) by striking ``shall be $3,645'' and inserting 
                ``shall be at the annual rate in effect under section 
                1521(e) of this title for a veteran who is similarly 
                situated''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of St. Joseph Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sharon K. Mrozek, Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Sharon K. Mrozek
Sharon K. Mrozek
Acting Principal Financial Officer


November 14, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          32,469
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,681
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,595
<PP&E>                                           6,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,097
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,852
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,910
<SALES>                                         89,255
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,255
<CGS>                                           60,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,976
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,275)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (80)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,195)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,195)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.94)


</TABLE>