alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 3.4


Shareholder meeting minutes (paste on Ingen letterhead if desired):
-------------------------------------------------------------------



                               AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS

DATE:  MARCH 15, 2005

On March 15, 2005, in the Annual Shareholders' Meeting, shareholders were asked
(by motion and vote) to authorize changing the date of the Annual Shareholders'
Meeting in the Company's Bylaws from May 15th of each year to March 15th. This
motion was unanimously approved by Shareholders.

Therefore, Article II of the Bylaws of Ingen Technologies, Inc. is amended to
read as follows:

Section 2. Annual meetings of shareholders, commencing with the year 2005, shall
be held on the 15th of March, if not a legal holiday, and if a legal holiday,
then on the next secular day following, at 10:00 a.m., at which they shall
elect, pursuant to law, a board of directors, and transact such other business
as may properly be brought before the meeting.


                                           -----------------------------
                                           Scott R. Sand, CEO & Chairman

Attest and affirm:


     -------------------------------------
     Secretary of Ingen Technologies, Inc.



                                        1
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mitcham Industries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. /s/ Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerMay 28, 2004
DEAN HELLER

Secretary of State

204 North Carson Street, Suite 1                                                      FILED # C367-88

Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299AUG 31, 2004

(775) 684-5708IN THE OFFICE OF

Website:  secretaryofstate.bizDean Heller

DEAN HELLER, SECRETARY OF STATE

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

(PURSUANT TO NRS. 78.385 and 78.390)



Important: Read attached instructions before completing form.





ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY



Certificate Of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

For Nevada Profit Corporations



(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 AND 78.390-After Issuance of Stock)



1.

Name of corporation:

W-Waves USA INC.



2.

The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if available):



A. The name of the corporation is hereby changed to:



CHINA TITANIUM & CHEMICAL CORP.



B. All issued and outstanding shares of the corporations common stock are hereby split in a reverse manner at a ratio of every One Hundred (100) shares of common stock reverse split into one (1) share of common stock; all fractional shares shall be rounded up to the next whole number and thus no fractional shares shall exist as a result of this reverse split.



C. The number of shares of Class A Common Stock that the corporation is authorized to issue is increased to 100,000,000 shares, at a par value of .001 per share, there is no other authorized class of stock.



3.

The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the Corporation entitling them to exercise a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the * articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is:

22,200,572



4.

Effective date of filing (optional):

(must not be later than 90 days after the certificate is filed)



5.

Officer Signature (required):  /s/ Michel Bourbonnais



*If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless of limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.



IMPORTANT:  Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.



This form must be accompanies by appropriate fees.  See attached fee schedule.

Nevada Secretary of State AM 78.38 Amend 2003



Revised on: 11/03/03
#### NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION (NTEU), Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, and United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Department of Homeland Security, Intervenor.

No. 05-76783.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 5, 2007.

Filed Dec. 19, 2007.

Robert H. Shriver, III; Gregory O’Du-den, General Counsel; Elaine Kaplan, Senior Deputy General Counsel; Larry J. Adkins, Deputy General Counsel; Julie M. *894Wilson, Assistant Counsel, National Treasury Employees Union, Washington, DC, for the petitioner.

James F. Blandford; William R. Tobey, Acting Solicitor, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, DC, for the respondent.

Howard S. Scher; Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; William Kanter, Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, Washington, DC; James N. DeStefano, Associate Chief Counsel; David Goldfarb, Assistant Chief Counsel; Caroline M. Blessey, Assistant Chief Counsel, United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, for the intervenor.

Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, ROBERT E. COWEN * and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Robert E. Cowen, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

We deny the petition for review for the reasons given by the D.C. Circuit in *National Treasury Employees Union v. Federal Labor Relations Authority,*453 F.3d 506, 511-12 (D.C.Cir.2006), whose rationale we adopt as our own.

PETITION DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         438,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               438,946
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,193,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,548
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,702,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,193,937
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,559
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,282,762
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,261,203)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,261,203)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,261,203)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21160]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81734; File No. SR-BatsBZX-2017-50]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change To Extend the Implementation Date 
For Certain Changes to Exchange Rules 14.11 and 14.12

September 27, 2017.
    On July 31, 2017, Bats BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 \1\ and Rule 
19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to extend the 
implementation date for certain changes to Exchange Rules 14.11 and 
14.12 relating to continued listing standards for exchange-traded 
products. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the 
Federal Register on August 18, 2017.\3\ The Commission received one 
comment letter on the proposed rule change.\4\ On September 22, 2017, 
the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-BatsBZX-2017-50).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81387 (August 14, 
2017), 82 FR 39473.
    \4\ See letter from Jane Heinrichs, Associate General Counsel, 
Investment Company Institute, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, 
Commission, dated September 1, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-21160 Filed 10-2-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 23

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference tothe Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our reportdated June 21, 2002, relating to the consolidated financial statements ofBoston Restaurant Associates, Inc. appearing in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10K for the year ended April 28, 2002.

 

 
|   |   |   |   | /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |   |                 |   |

 

Boston, Massachusetts

July 25, 2002

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      18,427,471
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  984,587
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,450
<INVENTORY>                                     58,927
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,744,945
<PP&E>                                      69,068,462
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,788,228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             132,066,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,724,523
<BONDS>                                    129,394,964
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,052,760)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               132,066,727
<SALES>                                     90,497,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            90,497,403
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               74,999,527
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,110,678
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,203,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,183,220
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,183,220
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           (15,238,156)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,054,936)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
23.1








Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders


of The
Savannah Bancorp, Inc.





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 333-146547) and Form S-8 (No. 333-69175) of The Savannah Bancorp, Inc.
of our report dated March 13, 2010, relating to
the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and for the two
years then ended, which appear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.








/s/Mauldin &
Jenkins, LLC





Albany,
Georgia


March13,2010
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2602 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2602

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
feasibility of designating the Ka'u Coast on the island of Hawaii as a 
                   unit of the National Park System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2009

 Ms. Hirono (for herself and Mr. Abercrombie) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
feasibility of designating the Ka'u Coast on the island of Hawaii as a 
                   unit of the National Park System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KA'U COAST STUDY; REPORT.

    (a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``Ka'u Coast 
Preservation Act''.
    (b) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
        complete a study to determine the suitability and feasibility 
        of designating the Ka'u Coast on the island of Hawaii, as a 
        unit of the National Park System.
            (2) Study area.--The study area shall extend generally from 
        Kapaoo Point to Kahuku Point, Hawaii.
            (3) Applicability of other law.--Paragraphs (2) and (3) of 
        section 8(c) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)(2) and 
        (3); commonly known as the National Park System General 
        Authorities Act) shall apply to the study.
    (c) Report.--Upon completion of the study required by subsection 
(b), the Secretary of the Interior shall transmit to the Committee on 
Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report containing the 
conclusions of the study.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 18, 2021

No. 04-21-00046-CV

IN RE Brad LARSEN, Rent Werx LLC D/B/A Larsen Properties and Leah Larsen,

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-10309

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Real Parties’ unopposed second motion for an extension is GRANTED. We order the 

Real Parties’ response due March 22, 2021.

It is so ORDERED March 18, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

 CLERK OF COURT
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2694 

To authorize the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard 

is operating to issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise 

endorsement for the vessel GULF DIVER IV. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2009 

Mr. INSLEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the department in which the 

Coast Guard is operating to issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement for the vessel 

GULF DIVER IV. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COASTWISE ENDORSEMENT AUTHORIZED. 

4 Notwithstanding sections 12112 and 12132 of title 

5 46, United States Code, the Secretary of the department 

6 in which the Coast Guard is operating may issue a certifi7 cate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement for 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2694 IH

1 the vessel GULF DIVER IV (United States official num2 ber 553457). 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
_________________

_________________ 1 Cite as: 601 U. S. ____ (2023)

Statement of K AVANAUGH , J. 

## SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 23A315
WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD., ET AL

. v. DEBRA

HAALAND, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL

. ON APPLICATION FOR STAY [October 25, 2023] The application for stay presented to T HE C HIEF J USTICE and by him referred to the Court is denied. The order here

tofore entered by T HE C HIEF J USTICE is vacated. Statement of J USTICE K AVANAUGH respecting the denial of the application for stay. I agree that the stay applicat ion should be denied in light of the D. C. Circuit’s pronouncement that the compact be

tween Florida and the Seminole Tribe authorizes the Tribe to conduct only on-reservation gaming operations, and not off-reservation gaming operations. 71 F. 4th 1059, 1062, 1065–1068 (2023); Response in Opposition to Application for Stay 7–10, 13–14. If the compact authorized the Tribe to conduct off-reservation gaming operations, either di

rectly or by deeming off-reservation gaming operations to somehow be on-reservation, then the compact would likely violate the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, as the District Court explained. 573 F. Supp. 3d 260, 272–274 (DC 2021); see 25 U. S. C. §§2710(d)(1), (d)(8)(A). To the extent that a separate Florida statute (as distinct from the compact) authorizes the Seminole Tribe—and only the Seminole Tribe—to conduct certain off-reservation gaming operations in Florida, the state law raises serious equal protection issues. See Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College , 600 U. S. 181, 206 (2023); Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña , 5152 WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. v. HAALAND

Statement of K AVANAUGH , J.

U. S. 200, 221–222 (1995). But the state law’s constitution

ality is not squarely presented in this application, and the Florida Supreme Court is in any event currently consider

ing state-law issues related to the Tribe’s potential off-res

ervation gaming operations.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 6D23-801 

Lower Tribunal No. CF20-003126-XX 

_____________________________ 

BRUCE L. CARR, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County. 

Michael P. McDaniel, Judge. 

June 4, 2024 

PER CURIAM. 

 AFFIRMED. 

WOZNIAK and SMITH, JJ., and LAMBERT, B.D., Associate Judge, concur. 

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED