alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Second Amendment to
                    Certificate of Limited Partnership of
               Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership III-G

     The  undersigned,  desiring to amend its amended  certificate  of limited
partnership  pursuant to the Oklahoma Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act,
as amended,  Okla.  Stat. tit. 54 (1993),  Section 301 et seq (the "Act"),  do
hereby state:

     1.   The  name  of the  limited  partnership  is  Geodyne  Energy  Income
Limited Partnership III-G.

     2. The date of filing of the original  Certificate  of Limited  Partnership
was  September  20, 1991, as amended by the First  Amendment to  Certificate  of
Limited  Partnership of Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership III-G filed on
February 25, 1993.

     3. The Amended  Certificate  of Limited  Partnership  is hereby  revised to
change  the name of the  General  Partner  and  Registered  Agent  from  Geodyne
Production Company to the following:

            Geodyne Resources, Inc.

Geodyne Production  Company merged with Geodyne Resources,  Inc., with Geodyne
Resources, Inc. surviving, effective June 30, 1996.

     DATED:    July 1, 1996

                                       Geodyne Production Company
                                        by Geodyne Resources, Inc.,
                                        successor by merger

                                        By:  /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Dennis R. Neill
                                             President

                                       Geodyne Resources, Inc.
                                        as General Partner

                                        By:  /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Dennis R. Neill
                                             President



                                      -1-
<PAGE>




                                       Geodyne Depositary Company, as the
                                       Limited Partner

                                       By:   /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Dennis R. Neill
                                             President

                                       Geodyne Resources, Inc., as
                                       Attorney-in-Fact for all Substituted
                                       Limited Partners

                                       By:   /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Dennis R. Neill
                                             President



                                      -2-
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
                                    OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aware, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



/s/   Michael A. Tzannes                                /s/   Keith E. Farris
------------------------                                -----------------------
Chief Executive Officer                                 Chief Financial Officer


Date:  May 10, 2007                                     Date: May 10, 2007


        The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document of the
Company or the certifying officers.




                                       29
Exhibit 32.4


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership III-D ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 30th day of March, 2004.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP III-D
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Scott
Scherr, Chief Executive Officer of The Ultimate Software Group, Inc., hereby
certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.











/s/ Scott ScherrScott
      ScherrChief
      Executive OfficerNovember
      10, 2008
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

# ** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the June 30, 2005 Form 10-Q of CornellCompanies, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Hyman, ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chairman of the Board, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ James E. Hyman                 |   |
|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|   | James E. Hyman, Chief  Executive   |
|   | Officer and Chairman of  the Board |
|   | August 9, 2005                |

 

----
286 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES AND GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF THE 

COMMISSIONERS

Washington, DC Chairman Edward J. Gleiman EX PAS III 6 years 10/14/04

 Do........... Commissioner Dana B. Covington EX PAS IV 6 years 10/14/04

 Do........... Commissioner Ruth Y. Goldway EX PAS IV 6 years 11/22/02

 Do........... Commissioner William H. Leblanc EX PAS IV 6 years 11/22/00

 Do........... Commissioner George A. Omas EX PAS IV 6 years 10/14/00

 Do........... Special Assistant to the Robert W. Mitchell

Commission

OT XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Special Assistant Peter P. Metrinko OT XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Special Assistant Gan Nelson OT XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Special Assistant Steven W. Williams OT XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Secretary Sylvia L. Brown OT XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Secretary Anne H. Cornelius OT XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Secretary Augustine Farmer OT XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Secretary Sherri J. Proctor OT XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Secretary Susan K. Salb OT XS ...... ...... ......

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL 

COUNSEL

 Do........... General Counsel Stephen L. Sharfman OT XS ...... ...... ......

OFFICE OF RATES, 

ANALYSIS AND PLANNING

 Do........... Director, Office of Rates, Robert Cohen

Analysis and Planning

OT XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Assistant Director, Office of William Ferguson

Rates, Analysis and Planning

OT XS ...... ...... ......

OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER 

ADVOCATE

 Do........... Director, Office of the Consumer Ted P. Gerarden

Advocate

OT XS ...... ...... ......

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE

 Do........... Chief Administrative Officer Margaret P. Crenshaw OT XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Personnel Officer Cyril J. Pittack OT XS ...... ...... ......

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON HOLOCAUST ASSETS IN THE U.S.

Washington, DC Executive Director Kenneth Klothen AD XS ...... 3 years 03/31/01

 Do........... Deputy Executive Director Eugene F. Sofer AD XS ...... 3 years 03/31/01

 Do........... General Counsel Lynda S. Mounts AD XS ...... 3 years 03/31/01
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.28



August 9, 2016 
Jerry Zeldis, M.D., Ph.D.
Dear Dr. Zeldis 
Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc., would like to offer you a part-time (20 hours per week) position as President and Chief Medical Officer of Clinical Development. In this position you will report to Henry Ji, President and CEO. Should you accept our offer of employment, we would like your start date to be August 16, 2016. 
Your base pay will be $275,000 per annum, payable at a rate of $11,458.83 gross semi-monthly. This will be paid to you during the Company's standard payroll cycle that pays on the 15th and last day of the month. 
Additionally, you will have a target bonus of 40% (forty-percent) of your base salary and you will be eligible for 200,000 Sorrento Therapeutics stock options. 
You will be eligible to participate in the Company's comprehensive benefits, which includes: fifteen (15) days Paid Time Off (PTO) per annum, 10 paid holidays, a matching retirement plan (401 k), life and AD&D, long-term disability, and a flexible reimbursement plan. 
Medical, dental, vision insurance coverage is available the first of the month after your start date. Long-term disability coverage begins the first of the month after 90 days of service. 
Additionally, you will be eligible to participate in the Company's employee stock option plan. 
As an employer, Sorrento requires its employees to maintain high standards of ethics and professionalism, and we specifically require the protection of proprietary information. As a condition of employment, you will be required to sign our standard employment, Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement.
As per state law, your employment at Sorrento is "at will." This means that the terms and conditions of employment may be changed by you or Sorrento, with or without cause and with or without notice, including but not limited to, promotion, transfer, compensation, benefits, duties and location of work, demotion or termination. Any modifications to this "at-will" term of your employment must be in writing and signed by you and by the President of Sorrento. 
Any and all representations made by Sorrento are contained in this offer. No other oral representations are binding on the company. All compensation indicated in this letter is subject to continued employment. This offer constitutes our complete offer package to recognize your new responsibilities and is revocable at any time. 
We are all really looking forward to you joining Sorrento. The position represents an excellent opportunity for you, and we feel you have the drive, knowledge and ability to perform as challenged. 











As a formality, please sign and return the original or scanned copy of this letter within seven (7) days to Pam Fettu indicating your acceptance of the position offered and retain a copy for your records. 
Sincerely, 
/s/ Henry Ji, Ph.D.
Henry Ji, Ph.D.     
President, Chief Executive Officer 


By signing below, I accept this offer of employment.
/s/ Jerome B. Zeldis. M.D., Ph.D.         8/12/2016    
Signature                                                                                                               Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         180,142
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               181,192
<PP&E>                                       4,436,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                 453,030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,165,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,152,078
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,165,031
<SALES>                                        494,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               499,602
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  229,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                270,175
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            270,175
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   270,175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    50.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 07-14-00419-CR

Eugene Thomas

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

From the 251st District Court

 of Potter County

October 21, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Quinn

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated October 21, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
### UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT FORTHEDISTRICT OFCOLUMBIA

GRAFF/ROSS HOLDINGS LLP, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) 

### v. ) Civil Case No. 07-796 (RJL) ) 

### FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant.

ORDER ) ) ) ) 

# f7--- Forthe reasons set forth in the

## Memora~dum Opinion enteredthi;z.

### f-f day of September 2012, it is hereby 

### ORDEREDthat the MagistrateJudge's Report and Recommendation [Dkt. 

### #82] is ADOPTED with the clarifications set forth in the Memorandum Opinion accompanyingthis Order; it is further 

### ORDEREDthat defendant's motion to dismiss [Dkt. 

### #35] be, andhereby is, converted into a motion for summaryjudgment; it is further 

### ORDEREDthat defendant's motion [Dkt. 

### #35] is GRANTED; it is further 

### ORDEREDthat defendant's Motion to Appoint a Patent Law Clerk [Dkt. 

### #34] is DENIED as moot; it is furtherORDERED that defendant's Motion to Compel Complete Interrogatory Responses and to Strike Plaintiffs Untimely Objection [Dkt. #54] is DENIED as moot; it is further ORDERED the plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production ofRelevant Financial and Technological Information [Dkt. #66] is DENIED as moot; it is further ORDERED that any remaining claims and counterclaims pending in the abovecaptioned case are DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED that the above-captions case is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice. SO ORDERED.

2
[958 NYS2d 860]

#### FS 41-45 Tiemann Place LLC, Appellant, v Teresa Estrella, Also Known as Teresa Silverio, Respondent, et al., Undertenants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 21, 2012

*30APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Adam Leitman Bailey, EC.,*New York City *(Jeffrey R. Metz*of counsel), for appellant. *Northern Manhattan Improvement Corporation Legal Services,*New York City *(Alan G. Morley*and *Kenneth Rosenfeld*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order dated April 26, 2011, reversed, with $10 costs, motion denied, and petition reinstated.

This holdover summary proceeding, premised upon the stabilized tenant’s alleged nonprimary residence, is not ripe for summary dismissal. The limited record now before us raises several mixed questions of law and fact, including whether the (unaccepted) renewal lease offer transmitted by a “back office” employee of the landlord’s “large and complex” clerical operation was mistakenly or inadvertently mailed to tenant and, if so, the proper legal effect to be given to the landlord’s prompt follow-up letter purporting to withdraw the offer and its subsequent, timely service of a combined notice of nonrenewal and termination detailing the facts underlying its nonprimary residence claim *(see generally Coleman v Dabrowski,*163 Misc 2d 763 [App Term, 1st Dept 1994]; *but compare Herman v Meryn,*NYLJ, July 29, 1994 at 21, col 1 [App Term, 1st Dept 1994] [lease renewal offer purposefully sent held binding upon landlord and “irrevocable for 60 days” (citing Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2523.5 [a])]). While we have no occasion to determine the bona tides of these issues, we do note that the creation of a landlord-tenant relationship or, more precisely here, the renewal of a rent-stabilized lease “should not be reduced to a matter of gamesmanship, seduction and artifice” *(Coleman v Dabrowski,*163 Misc 2d at 765) or be made to hinge on “gotcha” litigation tactics.

Lowe, III, EJ., Shulman and Torres, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,008
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     13,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,683
<PP&E>                                          67,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,665
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,758
<BONDS>                                         41,087
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,529
<COMMON>                                       (14,656)
<OTHER-SE>                                        (777)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,281
<SALES>                                        534,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               534,897
<CGS>                                          516,145
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  516,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (45,175)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (144)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (45,031)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (45,031)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (8.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (8.92)
        

</TABLE>
**UNPUBLISHED**
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

__________________ **No. 10 -**  **1587**

__________________ In R e: DARNELL E. ROSS , Petitioner.

__________________ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
.

__________________ Submitted: May 28, 2010 Decided: May 28, 2010

__________________ Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

__________________ Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

__________________ Darnell E. Ross, Petitioner Pro S e.

__________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Petitioner has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a pro se petition for writ of mandamus purportedly pursuant to the Crime Victim ’s Rights Act, 18 U.S .C. § 3771. The Crime Victim’s Rights Act affords to victims of crime the rights to receive notice of court p roceedings, to be heard at court proceedings, to confer with government counsel, to receive restitution, to be free from unreasonable delay, and t o be treated with fairness. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a). The Act provides that these rights shall be asserted in the district court and that “[i]f the district court denies the relief sought, the movant may petition the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus.” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(3). If such a petition is filed, “[t]he court of appeals shall take up and decide such application forthwith within 72 hours after the petition has been filed.” Id. Furthermore, “ [i]f the court of appeals denies the relief sought, t he reasons for the denial shall be clearly stated on the record in a written opinion.” Id. Petitioner Ross moves for relief from his state court sentence for abduction with intent to defile on the ground that his sentence was greater than that prescribed by the state legislature for this crime.3 The statutory provision for expedited mandamus review of a district court’s denial of rights asserted under 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a) has no application to the claims asserted by Ross. Ross’s claims are attacks on the legality of his confinement, which may be raised on direct appeal in state court , in state post

- conviction proceedings, or potentially in federal district court in a petition for writ of habeas corpus. He has not been denied any rights under 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a) which could form the basis for a mandamus petition to this Court. Accordingly, the Court denies the motion to proceed in forma pauperis as moot, and dismisses this mandamus petition.

PETITION DISMISSED