alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1997 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>                  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                        595,420               1,236,575
<SECURITIES>                                  290,662                 276,248
<RECEIVABLES>                               6,995,122               6,647,718
<ALLOWANCES>                                6,915,858               6,526,905
<INVENTORY>                                         0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              965,346               1,633,636
<PP&E>                                      5,340,446               5,848,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                761,861                 761,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              5,543,931               6,720,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         105,799                 234,392
<BONDS>                                             0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                       0
<COMMON>                                            0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  5,438,132               6,486,045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                5,543,931               6,720,437
<SALES>                                             0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              939,210               1,812,164
<CGS>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              334,705               1,114,692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               604,505                 697,472
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           604,505                 697,472
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                       0
<CHANGES>                                           0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  604,505                 697,472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   34.99                   40.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   34.99                   40.37
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                AMERIKING, INC.
               CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 Dec. 28, 1999 to          Dec. 29, 1998 to
                                   June 26, 2000             June 28, 1999
                              ------------------------  -----------------------
                                W/O PIK     With PIK      W/O PIK    With PIK
                               Dividends    Dividends    Dividends   Dividends
                              -----------  -----------  ----------- -----------
<S>                           <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>
EARNINGS
Income (loss) before income
 taxes benefit............... $(3,800,000) $(3,800,000) $   321,000 $   321,000
Interest expense.............  10,871,000   10,871,000    9,974,000   9,974,000
Amortization of deferred
 financing costs.............     459,000      459,000      446,000     446,000
Portion of rents
 representative of interest..   4,857,000    4,857,000    4,434,000   4,434,000
Preferred stock PIK
 dividends...................         --       306,000          --      288,000
                              -----------  -----------  ----------- -----------
  Total earnings............. $12,387,000  $12,693,000  $15,175,000 $15,463,000
                              -----------  -----------  ----------- -----------
FIXED CHARGES
Interest expense.............  10,871,000   10,871,000    9,974,000   9,974,000
Amortization of deferred
 financing costs.............     459,000      459,000      446,000     446,000
Portion of rents
 representative of interest..   4,857,000    4,857,000    4,434,000   4,434,000
Preferred stock PIK
 dividends...................         --       306,000          --      288,000
                              -----------  -----------  ----------- -----------
  Total Fixed Charges........ $16,187,000  $16,493,000  $14,854,000 $15,142,000
                              -----------  -----------  ----------- -----------
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
 CHARGES.....................        0.77         0.77         1.02        1.02
                              ===========  ===========  =========== ===========
INSUFFICIENT EARNINGS TO
 COVER FIXED CHARGES......... $(3,800,000) $(3,800,000)         N/A         N/A
                              ===========  ===========  =========== ===========
</TABLE>
Order filed, January 09, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 01053

- CV

____________ RAMESH KAPUR D/B/A A IC MANAGEMENT COMPAN Y , Appellant

V.

THE CITY OF BAYTOWN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 00556



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due November 25, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been f iled with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Norma Duarte , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 13, 2021

NO. 03

- 21

- 00326

- CV

R. P. and M. J. , Appellant s

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COU NTY

B EFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the decree of termination signed by the tr i a l court on June 24, 2021

.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial court’s decree of termination

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial

court’s decree of termination

. Because appellant s a re indigent and u nable to pay costs, no

adjudica t i on of costs is made.
firstamenddirectorsstockvalu.htm



Nicor Inc.


Form 10-K



Exhibit 10.71






 




FIRST AMENDMENT


TO


NICOR INC. DIRECTORS’ STOCK VALUE PLAN












This is the First Amendment (“First Amendment”) to Nicor Inc. Directors’ Stock Value Plan as amended and restated effective January 1, 2008 (the “Plan”).







WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Nicor Inc. (the “Company”), at its meeting on November 18, 2010, adopted an amendment to the Plan to increase the annual Award granted to each Eligible Director from the Fair Market Value of 1,200 shares of common stock of the Company to the Fair Market Value of 1,500 shares of common stock of the Company effective with the Plan Year that begins in calendar year 2011.







NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:







1.           The first sentence of Section 2.1(a) of the Plan is amended by deleting “1,200” and replacing it with “1,500”.







2.           Section 2.2(a) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted in lieu thereof:







“The term ‘Award’ shall mean the Fair Market Value of 1,500 shares of Stock, or such prorated amount as determined under Section 2.1(b) granted to an Eligible Director.”







3.           This First Amendment is first effective with respect to Awards granted for the Plan Year that begins in calendar year 2011.







4.           Capitalized terms used in this First Amendment that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan.







5.           Except as expressly amended by this First Amendment, the Plan remains in full force and effect in accordance with its original terms.
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.2

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of AES Gener S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to the best
  of such officers knowledge:

| | 1. | The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                  

June 8, 2007

| |                               
| | ------------------------------
| | /s/ Vanessa Thiers            
| | Vanessa Thiers                
| | Acting Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the AES Gener S.A. and will be retained by AES Gener S.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2980 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2980

    To limit reimbursement for excessive compensation of government 
          contractors equal to the pay of Cabinet Secretaries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2011

  Mr. Tonko introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To limit reimbursement for excessive compensation of government 
          contractors equal to the pay of Cabinet Secretaries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Excessive Taxpayer Payments to 
Government Contractors Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ALLOWABLE COMPENSATION COSTS.

    (a) Limitation.--
            (1) Civilian contracts.--Section 4304(a)(16) of title 41, 
        United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
            ``(16) Costs of compensation of contractor and 
        subcontractor employees for a fiscal year, regardless of the 
        contract funding source, to the extent that such compensation 
        exceeds the rate payable for level I of the Executive Schedule 
        under section 5312 of title 5.''.
            (2) Defense contracts.--Section 2324(e)(1)(P) of title 10, 
        United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
            ``(P) Costs of compensation of contractor and subcontractor 
        employees for a fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding 
        source, to the extent that such compensation exceeds the rate 
        payable for level I of the Executive Schedule under section 
        5312 of title 5.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) In general.--Section 1127 of title 41, United States 
        Code, is hereby repealed.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
        beginning of chapter 11 of title 41, United States Code, is 
        amended by striking the item relating to section 1127.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      320189
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            345993
<PP&E>                                     3034962
<DEPRECIATION>                             1688658
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2487447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       392999
<BONDS>                                     781732
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     58546
<OTHER-SE>                                 1050109
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1108655
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           2457607
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               502529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          200893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (559941)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (559941)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (559941)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.77)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1999 and the Statement of Operations for
the Year Ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,977
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,972
<PP&E>                                       3,888,882
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,430,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 572,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               39
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     571,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   572,001
<SALES>                                        193,199
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               195,248
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               105,975
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 89,273
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             89,273
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    89,273
<EPS-BASIC>                                       6.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.93


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1702

JOSEPH R. ZIEGLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES RIDER; JEFFREY BOGGS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at 

Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, District Judge. (2:19-cv-00855)

Submitted: October 20, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph R. Ziegler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph R. Ziegler appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights 

complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommended that the complaint be dismissed for 

failure to state a claim. The magistrate judge further advised Ziegler that failure to file 

timely, specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a 

district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is 

necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the 

parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v. Duffy, 858 

F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 846-47 (4th Cir. 1985); see 

also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154-55 (1985). Although Ziegler received proper notice 

and filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation, he has waived 

appellate review because, as the district court ruled, the objections were not specific to the 

particularized legal recommendations made by the magistrate judge. See Martin, 858 F.3d 

at 245 (holding that, “to preserve for appeal an issue in a magistrate judge’s report, a party 

must object to the finding or recommendation on that issue with sufficient specificity so as 

reasonably to alert the district court of the true ground for the objection” (internal quotation 

marks omitted)).
3

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
---

Exhibit 99.21

David Linebarger

SACRISON ENGINEERING

320 Poplar Drive, Elko, NV 89801-4508

Telephone: 775-753-9490

Facsimile: 775-549-8949



CONSENT OF EXPERT



February 25, 2010



British Columbia Securities Commission
     Securities Commission of Newfoundland and LabradorAlberta Securities Commission
     Registrar of Securities, Northwest TerritoriesSaskatchewan Financial Services Commission
     Registrar of Securities, NunavutManitoba Securities Commission
     Registrar of Securities, YukonOntario Securities Commission
     United States Securities and Exchange CommissionNew Brunswick Securities CommissionNova Scotia Securities CommissionRegistrar of Securities, Prince Edward Island


|Re: | Annual Information Form dated February 25, 2010 (the "Annual Information Form") of Minefinders Corporation Inc. (the "Company").
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I refer to the report entitled Technical Report on the La Bolsa Property, Sonora, Mexico dated October 16, 2009 (the Report) as referenced in the Annual Information Form and documents incorporated by reference therein.



This letter is being filed as my consent to the use of my name and the Report in the Annual Information Form and in documents incorporated by reference therein.



I confirm that I have read the Annual Information Form and I have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations that are derived from the Report referred to above or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services I performed in connection with such Report.



I consent to the filing of this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Company's Form 40-F dated February 25, 2010, and any amendment thereto, including post-effective amendments and as part of a post-effective amendment to the Company's Form F-10, to incorporate the Company's Form 40-F dated February 25, 2010.



Yours truly,

/s/ David Linebarger

David Linebarger



February 25, 2010




---
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UltraGuard Water
  Systems Corp.. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
  2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the "Report") I, John R Gaetz, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
  the Company.

|Date: August 22, 2005 |                                           
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|                      |                                           
|                      | /s/ John R Gaetz                          
|                      | John R Gaetz                              
|                      | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                   SECTION 906
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of National
Processing, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge,
that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 6, 2004                   /s/ David E. Fountain
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: David E. Fountain
                                        Title: Senior Vice President and Chief
                                        Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.