alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Management and Administrative Services Agreement, effective as of April 1, 2016 (the “MSA”), is made and entered into effective as of March 19, 2018 (the “Effective Date”), by and between GOLAR LNG PARTNERS LP, a limited partnership duly organized and existing under the laws of the Marshall Islands with its registered office at Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Island, Ajeltake Road, Majuro, Marshall Islands MH96960 (“GLP”), and GOLAR MANAGEMENT LTD, a company duly organized and existing under the laws of the United Kingdom with its registered office at 13th Floor, One America Square, 17 Crosswall, London EC3N 2LB, United Kingdom (“GML” and, together  with GLP, the “Parties”).
WHEREAS, GLP and GML entered into the MSA in order to allow GML to provide management and support services to GLP;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3(a) of the MSA, GML caused certain of its officers and directors set forth on Schedule B thereto to perform management services for GLP;
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of GLP, dated October 31, 2017, GLP’s Board of Directors appointed Brian Tienzo as the principal executive officer of GLP (the “Appointment”); and
WHEREAS, GLP and GML desire to amend the MSA to reflect the Appointment.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants, conditions, and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
SECTION 1.  Amendment to Schedule B. Schedule B of the MSA shall be deleted in its entirety and shall be replaced with the schedule attached hereto as Schedule B.
SECTION 2. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the United Kingdom.
SECTION 3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more signed counterparts, facsimile or otherwise, which shall together form one instrument.
[Signature page follows]
















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment by their duly authorized signatories with effect on the Effective Date. 
GOLAR LNG PARTNERS LP
By:    __/s/ Michael Ashford_
Name: Michael Ashford
Title:   Director
                            
GOLAR MANAGEMENT LTD
By:    _/s/  Graham Robjohns __
Name: Graham Robjohns
Title:   Director






[Signature Page to Amendment No. 1 to Management and Administrative Services Agreement]








SCHEDULE B


MANAGERS PROVIDING MANAGEMENT SERVICES


	
			
	Name
	Position with GML
	Services to be provided to GLP

	Brian Tienzo
	•    Chief Executive & Chief Financial Officer for Golar LNG Partners 
•    Senior Advisor – Group Financing
	•    Chief Executive Officer
•    Chief Financial Officer

	Oistein Dahl
	Chief Operating Officer
	•    Chief Operating Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(nn)

                    THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


Tuboscope Vetco International Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Company"),
Tuboscope Vetco International Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), and William V. Larkin, Jr. (the "Executive") have previously
entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of May 13, 1988 as amended April
30, 1992 and June 23, 1993 (the "Amended Agreement"). The Company and the
Corporation are hereinafter sometimes jointly referred to as "the Companies."

WHEREAS, the Companies are contemplating a transaction pursuant to which the
Companies would combine their business enterprises with those of another
company; (the contemplated transaction is hereinafter referred to as the
"Transaction"); and

WHEREAS, the Companies and Executive wish to modify the Amended Agreement in
certain respects generally and in particular respects in contemplation of the
Transaction;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises contained
herein the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged the parties
agree as set forth below:

1.    Paragraph 3 of the Amended Agreement is amended to read hereafter as
      follows:

      "In the event of Change of Control, all of Executive's unvested stock
      options shall vest without further action by either of the Companies or
      Executive. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the
      agreements covering such stock options, such stock options shall be
      exercisable for the five (5) full calendar years following the Change of
      Control pursuant to the other terms of the Amended and Restated Stock
      Option Plan for Key Employees and Directors of Tuboscope Vetco
      International Corporation."

2.    Subparagraph 4(g) of the Amended Agreement is amended by inserting
      "paragraph 3 and" immediately prior to "subparagraphs 4(a)-(g)" in the
      second line.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(nn)


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, the Corporation, and the Executive have
executed this Agreement on this 3rd day of January, 1996.

EXECUTIVE                               TUBOSCOPE VETCO INTERNATIONAL INC.


/s/  WILLIAM V. LARKIN, JR.             By: /s/  MARTIN R. REID            
--------------------------------            ------------------------------- 
William V. Larkin, Jr.                           Martin R. Reid           
                                                 Chairman of the Board

                                        TUBOSCOPE VETCO INTERNATIONAL
                                        CORPORATION


                                        By: /s/  MARTIN R. REID                 
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 Martin R. Reid                 
                                                 Chairman of the Board

                                       2
<PAGE>
 
                                                      Exhibit 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) 
of HomeCorp, Inc. of our report dated January 22, 1997, included in the 1996 
Annual Report to Shareholders of HomeCorp, Inc.


We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-4252) pertaining to the HomeCorp, Inc. 1996 Premium Price 
Stock Option and Incentive Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 
33-74082) pertaining to the HomeCorp, Inc. 1990 Stock Option and Incentive Plan 
of our report dated January 22, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of HomeCorp, Inc. incorporated by reference in the Annual Report 
(Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                             /s/ Ernst and Young LLP
                                             -----------------------
                                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 28, 1997


<PAGE>
 
[LOGO OF PEAT MARWICK LLP APPEARS HERE]




The Board of Directors
HomeCorp, Inc:

We have audited the consolidated statements of operations, changes in 
stockholders' equity and cash flows of HomeCorp, Inc. and subsidiary for the 
year ended December 31, 1994.  These consolidated financial statements are the 
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally auditing standards.  Those 
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable 
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material 
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present 
fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of 
HomeCorp, Inc. and subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 1994, in 
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company 
changed its method of accounting for goodwill to adopt the provisions of the 
Financial Accounting Standards Board's SFAS No. 72, "Accounting for Certain 
Acquisitions of Banking and Thrift Institutions," on January 1, 1994.


                                           /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 24, 1995
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 45876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21114]



[[Page 45876]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3389-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Alabama; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Alabama (FEMA-3389-EM), dated September 11, 2017, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 16, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective September 14, 2017.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-21114 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<PAGE>






                                     EXHIBIT 23.1





                             CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



                                           







                                         -69-

<PAGE>

                                      CONSENT OF
                       INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS







Barringer Laboratories, Inc.
Golden, Colorado



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of our report dated March 18, 1998, except for Note 13 which is as of
April 13, 1998, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Barringer
Laboratories, Inc. and subsidiaries appearing in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1997.








                                       BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



Denver, Colorado
April 13, 1998






                                      -70-
CIRCUIT COURT OF BUCHANAN COUNTY

#### Eddie D. Justus v. Thomas J. Penn

September 5, 1985

By JUDGE NICHOLAS E. PERSIN

Upon a review of the evidence, argument, and memoranda submitted concerning the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be granted on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s sole and exclusive remedy in this case is under the workmen’s compensation statutes.

The evidence is Clear that the Plaintiff by his actions and with representation and advice of counsel, chose a remedy under workmen’s compensation provisions. This appeared to be the proper method of obtaining benefits inasmuch as the record reveals that the Defendant was a fellow employee and the accident arose out of and during the course of Plaintiff’s employment. Furthermore, if the Court were to overrule the Motion to Dismiss, the Plaintiff would be permitted to take an inconsistent position with reference to all of the actions taken by him pursuant to the workmen’s compensation statutes.

Assuming that the injury received by the Plaintiff was intentionally inflicted by the Defendant, creating an exception to the workmen’s compensation provisions, the Plaintiff, in the judgment of the Court, would be estopped to seek recovery pursuant to the Motion for Judgment that has been filed in this case.

Counsel for the Plaintiff is directed to prepare the order dismissing this case from the docket pursuant to the rulings of the Court contained herein.
Exhibit 15(a)

Consent of independent registered public accounting firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements (Form F-3 No. 333-108084 and Form S-8 Nos. 333-99785,
333-89508, 333-104691, 333-126139, 333-181334 and 333-197846) of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC of our reports dated 16 February 2015, with respect to the Consolidated Financial Statements of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2014.



|                 
|-----------------
|ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|London, England  
|25 February 2015
Exhibit32.2


Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Mitchell K. Dauerman, Chief Financial Officer of The Ultimate Software Group, Inc., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.
 
 
 /s/ Mitchell K. DauermanMitchell K. DauermanChief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2010
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

#### Northern Neck Mutual Fire Association of Va. v. Garland M. Layton, M. J. Pitrone, Edward W. Bell, Pleasure House, Inc., and Southern Amusement Corp.

July 29, 1982

By JUDGE GEORGE W. VAKOS

After a careful review of the pleadings and the legal memoranda filed in the above case and after researching the authorities cited, I am of the opinion that Garland M. Layton is entitled to receive all of the funds inter-pleaded by Northern Neck Mutual Fire Association of Virginia.

Without repeating the facts of the case, it is sufficient to state that monies payable from the insurance policy in question are not "proceeds" in the sense that they were received as a result of disposition of the collateral of the security interests of Southern Amusement Corporation. "Proceeds" specifically exclude insurance payable to a person other than a party to the security agreement. In the instant case, the insurance was "payable to Garland M. Layton and Michael J. Pitrone as their interests may appear." Garland M. Layton was not a party to the Southern security agreement. Va. Code Ann. § 8.9-306 (1982 Cum. Supp.); *Lynch v.*Johnson, 196 Va. 516, 522 (1954).

*47If Southern had wished to have its security interest protected against loss by fire it could have required such protection as a condition of the note, as did Mr. Layton; or Southern, having an insurable interest could have obtained its own insurance. The nature and effect of an insurance contract is to indemnify the *insured*against loss and not someone who is not a party to the contract. A holder of a security interest in chattels insured by a policy payable to him as his interest may appear is entitled to payment of his claim out of the insurance monies in case of loss, in preference to other creditors, although the security interest was not properly perfected. *Manson*v. *Phoenix Ins.*Co., 64 Wis. 26, 24 N.W. 407, as cited in 44 Am. Jur. 2d 675 (1969).

The motion of Garland M. Layton to withdraw funds in the amount of $15,350.14 deposited with the court is granted, such withdrawal of funds to be deducted from amounts due Layton by prior owners of the secured property.
<PAGE>


                                 BRAINTECH INC.
   WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING SINCE INCEPTION (6 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS)
                                    31-MAR-99


Share issuances:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  (6 yrs * 365 + 91)
Date                    Amount         Numerator      Denominator    Weighted Average
<S>                    <C>             <C>        <C>                <C>
       1/3/94          17400000           2279            2281          17,384,744
       1/4/96            950000           1548            2281             644,717
       4/3/96            733333           1488            2281             478,386
       6/5/96           2000000           1361            2281           1,193,336
      9/23/96           1000000           1284            2281             562,911
     12/26/96           1200000           1191            2281             626,567

       1/1/97            150000           1186            2281              77,992
       2/5/97           1000000           1150            2281             504,165
       3/1/97             50000           1127            2281              24,704
      3/20/97           1000000           1106            2281             484,875
       6/1/97             50000           1001            2281              21,942
      9/23/97           1000000            919            2281             402,893
      12/1/97             50000            851            2281              18,654

      3/23/98           1600000            749            2281             525,384
      7/21/98            773000            618            2281             209,432
      8/11/98            165000            598            2281              43,257
      9/25/98           1250000            557            2281             305,239

      3/26/99           4400000            372            2281             717,580
       6/4/99           2600000            302            2281             344,235
      9/15/99           2350000            199            2281             205,020
     10/19/99           450,000            164            2281              32,354
     12/14/99             50000            109            2281               2,389
     12/16/99            107000            107            2281               5,019
     12/23/99           1010000             99            2281              43,836

      1/18/00           1120000             73            2281              35,844
      1/31/00           1243500             60            2281              32,709
      2/29/00           1817500             31            2281              24,701
      3/22/00             70000              9            2281                 276

                                                                        24,953,163
</TABLE>

                                     Page 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 17, 20 16

No. 04

- 16

- 00096

- CV

IN RE JAMES E. FAIRLEY

,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- PC

- 1068

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appell ant's Motion for Referral to Me d i ation is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of June, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000859621                       
<NAME>                        NDC AUTOMATION, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               NOV-30-1997               
<PERIOD-START>                  DEC-01-1996               
<PERIOD-END>                    NOV-30-1997               
<CASH>                              72,368               
<SECURITIES>                             0               
<RECEIVABLES>                      735,489               
<ALLOWANCES>                        65,000               
<INVENTORY>                        813,865              
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 1,627,954             
<PP&E>                           1,655,453              
<DEPRECIATION>                     526,076            
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   2,757,331              
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            1,057,695              
<BONDS>                                  0              
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0              
<PREFERRED>                              0      
<COMMON>                            34,534
<OTHER-SE>                         623,047           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     2,757,331              
<SALES>                          4,076,897              
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 4,076,897              
<CGS>                            2,695,289              
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    2,695,289              
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 2,246,006              
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0              
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                (195,962)              
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (1,060,360)               
<INCOME-TAX>                             0               
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (1,060,360)               
<DISCONTINUED>                           0           
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0      
<CHANGES>                                0      
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,060,360)      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (0.31)          
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.31)           
        

</TABLE>