alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-2541-000]


Estill Solar I, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding 
Estill Solar I, LLC`s application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 18, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85c3c0d7c6caebe9ecebe0d6f0f5f5eaf7f1c5e3e0f7e6abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c3a392e3f3312101512192f090c0c130e083c1a190e1f521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: September 28, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-21300 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 23

- Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm -

Audit Committee of
the Board of Directors and the Stockholders

First Community Bancshares, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements pertaining to the 2012 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (Form S-8, No. 333-183057); the 2011 Convertible Preferred Shares (Form S-3, No. 333-175262); the 2004 Omnibus Stock Option Plan (Form S-8, No. 333-120376); the 2001 Directors Stock Option Plan (Form S-8, No. 333-75222);
the 1999 Stock Option Plan (Form S-8, 333-31338); the Employee Stock Ownership and Savings Plan (Form S-8, No. 333-63865); and the TriStone Community Bank Employee and Director Stock Option Plans (Form S-8, No. 333-161473) of First
Community Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) of our reports dated March 3, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which reports appear in the Companys 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP
|                            
|Asheville, North Carolina   
|March 7, 2017
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman
Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack
David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 3, 2016 

# Order

June 3, 2016

153471 ( 17 )

STEVE LIVNEH, HENVIL CORPORATION, LTD, LICAN DEVELOPMENTS, LTD, REVITA HEALTH CORP., and REVITA TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.

, Plaintiff s

- Appell ants

,

v

COHEN LERNER & RABINOVITZ, P.C.

, d/b/a
COHEN LERNER RABINOVITZ WITUS

, Defendant

- Appell ee

. SC: 153471
COA: 331556
Oakland CC: 2012

- 126038

- NM

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellee to file a sur

- reply
is GRANTED. The sur

- reply submitted on May 25, 2016, is accepted for filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,174
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,025
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,771
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      917
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (917)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (917)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.1


                        MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC.

                         SUBSIDIARIES AND PARTNERSHIPS

                               DECEMBER 31, 1995


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       PLACE OF
                                     INCORPORATION                                    OWNERSHIP
SUBSIDIARY/PARTNERSHIP                OR DOMICILE               OWNER                 PERCENTAGE
----------------------               -------------              -----                 ----------
<S>                                  <C>            <C>                               <C>
Marine Drilling Management Company     Delaware     Marine Drilling Companies, Inc.       100%
Marine Drilling International, Inc.    Delaware     Marine Drilling Management Company    100%
Keyes Holding Corporation              Delaware     Marine Drilling Companies, Inc.       100%
</TABLE>
In the Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided: May 23, 2016

S16Y1280. IN THE MATTER OF TIFFINI COLETTE BELL.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition for voluntary

discipline filed by Tiffini Colette Bell (State Bar No. 676971), prior to the

issuance of a formal complaint, see Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2). In her petition, Bell,

who became a member of the Bar in 2006, seeks the imposition of a public

reprimand, and admits that, in the representation of a client in a child custody

matter, she violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 8.4 (a) (4) by failing to truthfully

communicate with her client regarding discovery and appointment of a guardian

ad litem, failing to timely respond to discovery, failing to seek appointment of

a guardian ad litem, and failing to thoroughly prepare for certain hearings. The

maximum sanction for a violation of Rules 1.3 and 8.4 (a) (4) is disbarment, and

the maximum sanction for a violation of 1.4 is a public reprimand. Bell also

admits that she received a confidential reprimand by the Investigative Panel on

November 20, 2015. In mitigation, Bell states, and the State Bar does not
disagree, that she lacked a selfish motive, that she sincerely regrets her conduct,

and that she has shown a cooperative attitude in the disciplinary proceedings. 

Having reviewed the petition and the State Bar’s response, we conclude

that a public reprimand is the appropriate sanction in this case, and we therefore

accept the petition for voluntary discipline. Accordingly, the Court hereby

orders that Bell receive a public reprimand in accordance with Bar Rules 4-102

(b) (3) and 4-220 (c) for her admitted violations of Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 8.4 (a)

(4).

Petition for voluntary discipline accepted. Public reprimand. All the

Justices concur.

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as Receiver for 10086—Security Bank of Gwinnett County, Suwanee, Georgia (Receiver) has been authorized to take all actions necessary to terminate the Receivership Estate of Security Bank of Gwinnett County (Receivership Estate); the Receiver has made all dividend distributions required by law.

                    The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary;                           ( print page 46238)                        including but not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, assignments and deeds. Effective October 1, 2017, the Receivership Estate has been terminated, the receiver discharged, and the Receivership Estate has ceased to exist as a legal entity.                

Dated: September 29, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-21323 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
bkit_ex103.htm

EXHIBIT 10.3

 

 

 

 


	 
	1

	


	 



 

 


	 
	2

	


	 



 

 

 


	
3
Exhibit
      32


OFFICER'S
        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
        2002


In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Tix Corporation (the
      "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:
                March 27, 2008
              By:
              /s/
                MITCH FRANCISMitch
                  FrancisChief Executive
                Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
#### MRI Enterprises, Inc., Appellant, v Brooklyn Radiology, P. C., et al., Respondents.

[666 NYS2d 481]

—In an action to recover the proceeds of a promissory note, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated October 28, 1996, which denied its motion for summary judgment.

*495Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted, and the defendants’ counterclaim is dismissed.

The documentary evidence presented by the plaintiff establishes its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on both its complaint and the defendants’ counterclaim. The defendants’ unsubstantiated conclusory assertions were insufficient to refute the plaintiffs documentary evidence or to otherwise create a triable issue of fact (see, *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Mark Gustafson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Scarab Systems, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  November 15, 2004

/s/ Mark Gustafson_________
Mark Gustafson
President, CEO and CFO
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Reporting Officer)
Exhibit 31


               OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   I, Mitch Francis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Tix Corporation (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
Company and have:

   a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

   b. Omitted;

   c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

   d. Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the
Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

   b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date:  March 28, 2006                       By:  /s/ MITCH FRANCIS
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Mitch Francis
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 24, 2015

p1116

Order 

Clerk

November 24, 2015

150297(47)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150297

COA: 315670

Van Buren CC: 1977-003053-FC

LEO RAYMOND TERLISNER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 3, 2015 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.