alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BOYKIN LODGING COMPANY AS OF JUNE 30, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001015859
<NAME> BOYKIN LODGING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,893
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         655,255
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 606,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        300,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     266,690
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   606,532
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,133
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   488
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,836
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,836
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,836
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT UTILIZES AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET THEREFORE TOTAL CURRENT
ASSETS AND TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES ARE NOT APPLICABLE.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### The Overseers of the Poor of the Town of Sherburne *against*The Overseers of the Poor of the Town of Norwich.

Where a ,person is elected Constable of a town, and enters upon the duties of his office, but before the expiration. of the year, removes from the town, and does not afterwards act as a constable, except occasionally coming to the town to collecthis fees, and settle his old accounts, but no constable is appointed in his place for the remainder of the year, this is not such an execution of a public annual office, *during one whole*¡year, as to gain him a settlement in the town of which he was constable, within the *act for the relief and settlement of the poor.*Sess. 36. c. 78. s. 2. (i 2V. *R. L.*279.)

IN ERROR, on *certiorari*to the Court of General Sessions of the Peace of the county of *Chenango**

The paupers, George G. *King*and his wife and children, were removed from the town of *Norwich*to the town of Sherburne, by the order of two justices; and on an appeal from this order by the overseers of Sherburne, it was affirmed by the Court of Sessions.

The pauper, King, had previously acquired a settlement in the town of Bloomfield, in the county of *'Ontario,*by the purchase of a freehold estate. In the winter of 1816, he. removed to *Sherburne*; and in *March*following, was duly elected a constable of that town, took the,oath of office, and resided and acted as constable there, until the 18th of *December^*in the same year, when he, was imprisoned in the gaol of the county, at Norwich, for thirty days, on an execution issuing out of a Justice’s Court. On the 18th of *January,*1817, the day after his release from gaol, he removed his family to Norwich, where they resided about six months, until they were removed back to Sherburne, by virtue of the order now in question. After the pauper came to reside at Norwich, he did no act as constable of Sherburne, except that he occasionally went to *Sherburne*to collect his fees, and to settle his old accounts as constable; and, in one instance, he procured an old execution to be renewed, and demanded his fees upon it. No other constable was appointed or elected in his place, for the remainder of the ycar? after he removed from *Sherburne**

*Per*Curiam.

The only question is, whether the pauper had, within the spirit and meaning of the statute, executed any public annual office or charge, in the town of *Sherburne^ during one whole*year. *(Act for the relief and settlement of the*poor, sess. 36, c, 78* s. 2 1 *NR, h.*279.)

*189Under the circumstances of this case, we are of opinion, that in the true sense of the statute, *King*cannot be considered as executing the office of constable in the town of Sherburne, after he removed his family, and went to reside in *Norwich.*The year was, therefore, not complete, and his last legal settlement was in *Bloomfield.*

Order quashed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 21, 2019

No. 04-19-00423-CV

IN RE Z.K.T.W. AND Z.K.R.

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00921

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file the appellant’s brief is granted. We 

order counsel for appellant, Shawn Sheffield, to file the appellant’s brief by September 3, 2019. 

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights which must 

be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. TEX. R. JUD.

ADMIN. 6.2. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further request 

for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of August, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of netGuru, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: February 11, 2005                      By: /s/ AMRIT K. DAS
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Amrit K. Das
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  (principal executive officer)

Dated: February 11, 2005                      By: /s/ BRUCE K. NELSON
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Bruce K. Nelson
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (principal financial officer)

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3073 

To designate the Haqqani network as a foreign terrorist organization. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2011 

Mr. POE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To designate the Haqqani network as a foreign terrorist 

organization. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The Secretary of State shall designate the Haqqani 

5 network as a foreign terrorist organization under section 

6 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

7 1189). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 335 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 335

 To provide for a 10 percent reduction in pay for Members of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2011

   Mr. Griffith of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to 
 the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a 10 percent reduction in pay for Members of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN PAY FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

    (a) Reduction.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
annual rate of pay for each Member of Congress shall be as follows:
            (1) For pay periods during the period beginning October 1, 
        2011, and ending December 31, 2012, the applicable rate in 
        effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) For pay periods occurring during 2013, the applicable 
        rate during the period described in paragraph (1) reduced by 10 
        percent, rounded to the nearest multiple of $100 (or, if midway 
        between multiples of $100, to the next higher multiple of 
        $100).
            (3) For subsequent pay periods, the applicable rate during 
        2013, subject to adjustment under paragraph (2) of section 
        601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 
        31(2)).
    (b) Member of Congress Defined.--For purposes of this Act, the term 
``Member of Congress'' means an individual serving in a position under 
subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of section 601(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31).
                                 <all>
```
## THE AITQECNEP GENERAL UBP TEXAS

The Honorable H. Q. Sibley Executive Director Opinion No. H-854 Texas Animal Health Commission Re: Authority of Texas 1020 Sam Houston State Office Animal Health Commission Building to indemnifyowners of Austin, Texas 78701 swine infectedwith pseudorabieswhich have been slaughteredon order of the Commission. Dear Doctor Sibley: You have requested our opinion regarding the authority of the TexasAnimal Health Commission to indemnify owners of swine infectedwith pseudorabies. Article 7014f-1,V.T.C.S., authorizes the Commission

to order swine infectedwith, or exposed to, vesicular exanthema, foot and mouth disease, hog cholera and **other** diseases of swine to **be** sold for immediate slaughter at public slaughteringestablishmentswhere federalpost mortem inspection ismaintained; or the Commissionmay authorize such slaughter upon the owner's property, premises or other place under **the** direction of said Commission. Section 22a(4). Furthermore, the succeeding subsectionprovides that

[a]ftersuch sale and slaughter of swine infectedwith or exposed to vesicular exanthema, foot and mouth disease, and hog cholera, the Commission is authorized to pay the owner of such swine out of funds appropriatedby the Legislature for that purpose in an amount not to exceed fifty

**p. 3603** The Honorable H. Q. Sibley - page 2 (M-854

per cent (50%)of the appraisedvalue of such animals after deducting the amount of salvage received for them by the owner. Section 22a(5). You state that pseudorabies is a highly infectious swine disease which has been diagnosed in a herd of swinewithin the state. If pseudorabies is **a** swine disease, it comes within the provisions of subsection (4),which permits the Commission to order the sale and immediate slaughterof swine infected with or exposed to "otherdiseases." The **Commission ’** **s** authority under the indemnificationprovision, however, is limited to those diseases specificallyenumerated therein, and unlike subsection (4)does not include "otherdiseases." Whether we deal here with legislativeoversight or legislative intent is not known to us, but the statute as written is clear. SUMMARY

Uner the present wording of the statute, the Texas Animal Health Commission is authorized to order the sale and immediate slaughter of swine infectedwith or exposed to pseudorabies,but it **may** not indemnify the owner of the swine therefor. Very truly yours,

Attorney General of Texas APPROVED:

Opinion Committee jwb

p.3604
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-88,966-01

EX PARTE JUAN G. LERMA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2016-DCR-02335-B IN THE 138 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM CAMERON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of

marihuana and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment in a state jail facility. He did not appeal his 

conviction.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance

because counsel assured Applicant that his guilty plea would not result in incarceration. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Moody, 991 S.W.2d 856, 857–58 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
2

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall make specific findings of fact determining

whether counsel promised Applicant he would receive a community supervision sentence and, if so,

whether Applicant would have chosen a jury trial but for counsel’s assurances. The trial court shall

also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate

to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: October 24, 2018
3

Do not publish
Exhibit 32.6


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership III-F ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 30th day of March, 2004.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP III-F
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force.

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability (NOA) of a Record of Decision (ROD).

On September 8, 2017, the United States Air Force signed the ROD for the KC-46 Third Main Operating Base (MOB 3) Beddown. The ROD states the Air Force decision to beddown up to twelve (12) KC-46 Primary Aerospace Vehicles Authroized (PAA) in one squadron at Seymor Johnston Air Force Base, where the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) leads the Mobility Air Force Mission.

                    The decision was based on matters discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the KC-46 Third Main Operating Base (MOB 3) Beddown (                    *http://www.kc-46a-beddown.com/​*); contributions from the public and regulatory agencies; and other relevant factors. The FEIS was made available to the public on April 14, 2017 through a NOA in the                     **Federal Register**                     (82 FR 17991) with a 30-day wait period that ended on May 15, 2017.                

*Authority:*                     This NOA is published pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR part 1506.6) implementing the provisions of the NEPA of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321,                     *et seq.*) and the Air Force's Environmental Impact Analysis Process (32 CFR parts 989.21(b) and 989.24(b)(7)).                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Mr. Hamid Kamalpour, AFCEC/CZN, 2261 Hughes Ave., Ste. 155, Lackland AFB, TX 78236-9853. Ph: (210) 925-2738.

Henry Williams, Jr., 

Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-20822 Filed 9-27-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
exv10w29









Exhibit 10.29





	 	 	 

	

	 	7475 LUSK BLVD. • SAN DIEGO, CA 92121

858.909.1800 | toll free: 800.455.1476 | fax: 858.909.2000
	 
	 	 
	Alexis V. Lukianov
	 	 
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 






January 3, 2011




Tyler Lipschultz

6135 Blue Dawn Trail

San Diego, CA 92130



Dear Tyler,



Congratulations on your merit increase. Being awarded a merit increase means that you are a
NuVasive “A” Player. You have successfully performed your stretch goals, demonstrated outstanding
performance standards, have embraced your challenges with enthusiasm, and have continuously worked
to perpetuate and grow our culture. I trust that you feel “lucky” and have an attitude of
“gratitude” concerning this opportunity.



Your new rate of compensation is $320,000 dollars and will be reflected on the January 15, 2011
paycheck.



As Shareowners, our common goal is to contribute meaningfully towards NuVasive’s growth targets,
deliver new and creative products, leverage resources for profitability and exercise Absolute
Responsiveness© to the maximum level. I look forward to continuing the
journey with you.



Keep up the great work and let’s have a big, Big, REALLY BIG finish to 2010!




I wish you tremendous success!



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Onward and Upward!




NUVASIVE, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Alexis V. Lukianov
 	 
	 	 	Alex Lukianov 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 


Please sign below indicating your understanding and acceptance of this merit increase and return
the fully executed letter to Susan Joseph, Senior Manager, Human Resources. You should keep on
copy of this letter for your records.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	                          /s/ Tyler P. Lipschultz    1-3-2011 	 
	 	Tyler Lipschultz            Date
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Braintech, Inc. (the "Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Owen L.J. Jones the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/  Owen L.J. Jones                      

Owen L.J. Jones

Principal Executive Officer 

May 12, 2006