alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DIAL
CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           8,834
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,714
<INVENTORY>                                    119,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               244,335
<PP&E>                                         248,609
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 879,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          235,338
<BONDS>                                        207,404
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           961
<OTHER-SE>                                     188,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   879,906
<SALES>                                        999,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               999,800
<CGS>                                          526,050
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  526,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 96,508
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,451
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             61,057
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    61,057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
        

</TABLE>
LAW AND CHANCERY COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK

#### Spinella v. Lynch

May 27, 1969

Case No. (Law) 2070

By JUDGE WALTER A. PAGE

I am advised by Mr. Moulton’s office that he does not care to respond to Mr. Rutherford’s letter of April 9 and, consequently, am prepared to decide the issue raised by counsel for the defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure of the plaintiff to comply with Rule 3:3 of the Rules of Supreme Court of Appeals which reads: "No judgment shall be entered against a defendant who was served with process more than one year after the commencement of the action against him unless the court finds as a fact that the plaintiff exercised due diligence to have timely service on him."

The motion for judgment was filed on May 13, 1966, and after the return of "Not Found" was made, no efforts were made to serve the defendant until April of 1968. In the interim, as the stipulation of facts and enclosures attached thereto will indicate, there was correspondence between counsel for the plaintiff and the representatives of the defendant in this case. The defendant died on November 6, 1966.

Counsel for the defendant, as set forth in his letters to the court in more detail, takes the position that the plaintiff has not exercised due diligence to perfect timely service because the plaintiff had available the provisions of the nonresident motorist statute, and cites the case of *Bergman*v. Turpin, 206 Va. 539 (1965), as analogous. While that case deals with the statute of *446limitations and points out that suits cannot be allowed to be postponed indefinitely depriving a defendant of a defense, preventing his knowledge of an action until years have passed, the Supreme Court of Appeals, in deciding another matter not related to what is before the court at this time, has said that the due diligence required should be proportioned to the injurious consequences likely to result from delay. See *Simmons*v. Palmer, 93 Va. 389 (1896). It is clear that the portion of the Rule in issue here was designed to prevent a person from filing a motion for judgment within the statute of limitations and then failing to do anything further in prosecution of its action against the defendant by way of obtaining service of process. In the instant case the representatives of the defendant were fully cognizant of the motion for judgment and under the circumstances the court is of the opinion that the defendant cannot rely upon this Rule to defeat the plaintiff’s action.

An order overruling the motion to dismiss, preserving counsel for the defendant’s exception thereto, may be presented.
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3158 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2012 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

Agency to change the Spill Prevention, Control, and 

Countermeasure rule with respect to certain farms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3158 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmers Undertake 

3 Environmental Land Stewardship Act’’ or the ‘‘FUELS 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, 

6 AND COUNTERMEASURE RULE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator, in imple8 menting the Spill Prevention, Control, and Counter9 measure rule with respect to any farm, shall— 

10 (1) require certification of compliance with such 

11 rule by— 

12 (A) a professional engineer for a farm 

13 with— 

14 (i) an individual tank with an above15 ground storage capacity greater than 

16 10,000 gallons; 

17 (ii) an aggregate aboveground storage 

18 capacity greater than or equal to 42,000 

19 gallons; or 

20 (iii) a history that includes a spill, as 

21 determined by the Administrator; or 

22 (B) the owner or operator of the farm (via 

23 self-certification) for a farm with— 

24 (i) an aggregate aboveground storage 

25 capacity greater than 10,000 gallons but 

26 less than 42,000 gallons; and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3158 RFS

1 (ii) no history of spills, as determined 

2 by the Administrator; and 

3 (2) exempt from all requirements of such rule 

4 any farm— 

5 (A) with an aggregate aboveground storage 

6 capacity of less than or equal to 10,000 gallons; 

7 and 

8 (B) no history of spills, as determined by 

9 the Administrator. 

10 (b) CALCULATION OF AGGREGATE ABOVEGROUND

11 STORAGE CAPACITY.—For the purposes of subsection (a), 

12 the aggregate aboveground storage capacity of a farm ex13 cludes all containers on separate parcels that have a ca14 pacity that is less than 1,320 gallons. 

15 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

16 In this Act, the following terms apply: 

17 (1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term ‘‘Adminis18 trator’’ means the Administrator of the Environ19 mental Protection Agency. 

20 (2) FARM.—The term ‘‘farm’’ has the meaning 

21 given such term in section 112.2 of title 40, Code 

22 of Federal Regulations. 

23 (3) GALLON.—The term ‘‘gallon’’ refers to a 

24 United States liquid gallon. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 3158 RFS

1 (4) SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND COUN2 TERMEASURE RULE.—The term ‘‘Spill Prevention, 

3 Control, and Countermeasure rule’’ means the regu4 lation promulgated by the Environmental Protection 

5 Agency under part 112 of title 40, Code of Federal 

6 Regulations. 

Passed the House of Representatives August 1, 

2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**ICONIX
      BRAND GROUP, INC.**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Warren
      Clamen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Warren ClamenWarren
                Clamen
              Chief
                Financial OfficerFebruary
                28, 2008
## NUMBER 13
- 2 1
- 00 280
- C R
COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS
CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

DEVON KEITH DEBORD, Appellant ,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 24 t h District Court of Goliad County, Texas.



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

This appeal wa s set for oral argument on November 3, 2022. Appellant Devon Debord has filed an unopposed motion to postpone oral argument. Among the reasons provided, appellant’s counsel state s that she “is currently subject to a grievance that stems
from this case, whi ch has created a conflict.” She asks the Court “to postpone arguments2

pending the resolution of said grievance, which is expected to be after the new year.”
It is unclear to the Court whether th is “conflict” means a “conflict of interest , ” and if

so, how t h at bears on counsel’s representation of appellant. Accordingly, the Court grants the motion to postpone , abates the appeal, and remands the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing. Within thirty (30) days of this order, the trial court is ordered to conduct a hearing and issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on whether a conflict of interest

has arisen that would re quire appellant to obtain new counsel. If such a conflict exists and

it has not been effectively waived by appellant , the trial co urt should either order appellant

to retain new counsel within a reasonable time or appoint new counsel if appe llant cannot
afford to do so

. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed, the
name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. Finally, t he Goliad County District Clerk is ordered to supplement the appellate record with the trial court’s findings and conclusions , as well as an y other filings or orders pertaining to this issue

.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 25 t h day of October, 2022.
Exhibit 31(a)



CERTIFICATION



I, Dwight V. Neese, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Union Financial Bancshares, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 21, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    Dwight V. Neese                               
|                     |  |  |  | Dwight V. Neese President and Chief Executive Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2752 

To establish certain requirements relating to the provision of services to 

minors by family planning projects under title X of the Public Health 

Service Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2009 

Mr. AKIN (for himself, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. 

BARTLETT, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CANTOR, 

Mr. CARTER, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. GARRETT of 

New Jersey, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. HERGER, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. JORDAN of 

Ohio, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. LATTA, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. 

MORAN of Kansas, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. PAUL, Mr. PENCE, Mr. 

PITTS, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. TERRY, Mr. 

TIAHRT, Mr. WAMP, and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To establish certain requirements relating to the provision 

of services to minors by family planning projects under 

title X of the Public Health Service Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Parent’s Right to 

5 Know Act of 2009’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2752 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVISIONS REGARDING TITLE X FAMILY PLAN2 NING PROJECTS. 

3 (a) PROVISION OF CONTRACEPTIVE DRUGS OR PRE4 SCRIPTION DEVICES TO MINORS.—None of the funds ap5 propriated in any Federal Act for any fiscal year for car6 rying out title X of the Public Health Service Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 300 et seq.) may be made available to any family 

8 planning project under section 1001 of such title if any 

9 provider of services in the project knowingly provides con10 traceptive drugs or prescription devices to a minor, un11 less— 

12 (1) such provider of services has given actual 

13 written notice to a custodial parent or custodial legal 

14 guardian of the minor, notifying the parent or legal 

15 guardian of the intent to provide the drugs or pre16 scription devices, at least five business days before 

17 providing the drugs or prescription devices; 

18 (2) the minor has the written consent of a cus19 todial parent or custodial legal guardian to receive 

20 the drugs or prescription devices; 

21 (3) the minor is emancipated under applicable 

22 State law; or 

23 (4) a court of competent jurisdiction has di24 rected that the minor may receive the drugs or pre25 scription devices. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2752 IH

1 (b) CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE.—Each provider 

2 of services under section 1001 of title X of the Public 

3 Health Service Act shall each year certify to the Secretary 

4 of Health and Human Services compliance with this sec5 tion. Such Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as 

6 may be necessary to effectuate this section. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2950 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2950

  To amend the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 with respect to small 
          business access to capital, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2011

Mr. Donnelly of Indiana (for himself, Mr. Boren, Mr. Altmire, Mr. Baca, 
   Mr. Barrow, Mr. Cardoza, Mr. Matheson, Mr. McIntyre, Mr. Ross of 
 Arkansas, Mr. Schiff, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, Mr. Shuler, and Mr. 
   Michaud) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 with respect to small 
          business access to capital, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Administration 504 
Loan Refinancing Extension Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. LOW-INTEREST REFINANCING UNDER THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS 
              LOAN PROGRAM.

    Section 1122(b) of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 is amended 
by striking ``Effective 2 years after'' and inserting ``On the date 
that is 3 years after''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         487,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,012,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   515,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,195,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,689,000
<PP&E>                                      10,492,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,625,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,508,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,407,000
<BONDS>                                     36,835,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,735,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,508,000
<SALES>                                     76,328,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            76,328,000
<CGS>                                       51,210,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,956,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               570,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                78,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,744,000<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,230,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,006,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,236,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,236,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES AMORTIZATION OF THE RELATED DEFERRED LOAN COSTS OVER THE TERM OF 
THE LOAN AND THE WAIVER FEE TO THE BONDHOLDERS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          39,267
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  471,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    150,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               790,102
<PP&E>                                         523,287
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,260,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          524,212
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           173
<OTHER-SE>                                     393,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,260,567
<SALES>                                        264,701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               264,701
<CGS>                                          218,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,582
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,005
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,711
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,341
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,702)
<CHANGES>                                      (3,147)
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,492
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>