alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8) pertaining to (i) the 1996 Equity Participation Plan (No. 333-05233),
(ii) the D.O.S. Ltd. 1993 Stock Option Plan (No. 333-05237), (iii) the Tuboscope
Vetco International Inc. 401(k) Thrift Savings Plan (No. 333-43385), (iv) the
Tuboscope Inc. Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan (No. 333-56039) and (v)
the Tubocope Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (No. 333-56041) of Tuboscope Inc.
of our report dated January 28, 2000 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Tuboscope Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Houston, Texas
February 16, 2000
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-4407
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL ANTHONY HALL, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-277) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 6, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Danny T. Ferguson, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney, Scott P. Mebane, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Hall appeals his conviction for bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (1994). Hall claims he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that he felt pressured by his attorney to plead guilty. A claim of ineffective assistance is notproperly raised on direct appeal unless the record discloses conclusively that defense counsel was ineffective. United States v. Williams , 977 F.2d 866, 871 (4th Cir. 1992), cert. denied , 507 U.S. 942 (1993). Because the record does not conclusively disclose thatHall was denied effective assistance of counsel, we will not address his ineffective assistance claim. Rather, Hall may bring his claim in a habeas corpus proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. To the extent that Hall challenges the volunt ariness of his guilty plea, our review of the record reveals that such a claim is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm Hall's conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership III-B ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 30th day of March, 2005.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP III-B
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALLAIRE
CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,247
<SECURITIES>                                       496
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (502)
<INVENTORY>                                        141
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,033
<PP&E>                                           6,497
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,197)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,724
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,931)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,708
<SALES>                                         17,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,362
<CGS>                                            1,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,520
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,139)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,139)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,139)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.20)


</TABLE>
Order entered November 4 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01726
- CR CHARLES RAY JAMES, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. F12
- 60716
- H



### O RDER On May 29, 2013, we ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including, but not limited to, specific c ourt costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. On June 11, 2013, the Dallas County District Clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record. However, the detailed itemization of costs included in the supplemental record does not comply with the Texas Cod e of Criminal Procedure. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. arts. 103.001, 103.006 (West 2006). Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within SEVEN DAYS of this order, a second supplemental clerk’s record that contains a detailed item ization of the costs assessed in this case that complies with articles 103.001 and 103.006 of the Texas Code ofCriminal Procedure. See id. art. 103.001 (“A cost is not payable by the person charged with the

cost until a written bill is produced or is rea dy to be produced, containing the items of cost, signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost .”) (emphasis added); 103.006 (“If a criminal action or proceeding . . . is appealed, an officer of th e court shall certify and sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have accrued and send the bill of cost to the court to which the action or proceeding is . . . appealed) (emphasis added). We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Civil Records Division; and counsel for all parties. /s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1565 In Re: TAMMY M. STONE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-04-44-2) Submitted: August 27, 2004 Decided: January 21, 2005 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tammy M. Stone, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tammy M. Stone has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Stone has failed to demonstrate that she has a clear and indisputable right to mandamus relief. See Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Accordingly, although we grant Stone’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
RESIGNATION AGREEMENT  AND GENERAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS
     1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



EXECUTIVE UNDERSTANDS THAT SHE SHOULD CONSULT WITH AN ATTORNEY PRIOR TO SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT
AND THAT SHE IS GIVING UP ANY LEGAL CLAIMS SHE HAS AGAINST THE PARTIES RELEASED ABOVE BY SIGNING
THIS AGREEMENT. EXECUTIVE FURTHER UNDERSTANDS THAT SHE MAY HAVE UP TO 21 DAYS TO CONSIDER THIS
AGREEMENT, THAT SHE MAY REVOKE IT AT ANY TIME DURING THE 7 DAYS AFTER SHE SIGNS IT (BY EMAIL NOTICE
OF REVOCATION TO THE EMAIL ADDRESS LISTED IN PARAGRAPH 1), AND THAT IT SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE
UNTIL THAT 7-DAY PERIOD HAS PASSED. EXECUTIVE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SHE IS SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT
KNOWINGLY, WILLINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY IN EXCHANGE FOR THE SEVERANCE PACKAGE DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH
3, WHICH SEVERANCE PACKAGE EXECUTIVE WOULD NOT BE ENTITLED TO RECEIVE BUT FOR HER EXECUTION OF THIS
AGREEMENT.
 Dated:  February 9, 2011.
    /s/ Sylvia Summers CouderSYLVIA SUMMERS COUDERTRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.Dated:  February 10, 2011
    By:
    /s/ David L. Teichmann 4




---



##### 



APPENDIX A
  Company
 1.
    
    To resign my position as any officer and/or director of each and every subsidiary of
the Company (including all representative offices or other entities organized thereunder),
whether incorporated or organized in the United States or any country (each such entity, a
Company Subsidiary) and to prepare, implement and execute any and all documents as may
be required to effect such resignations from any such Company Subsidiary; and2.
    
    To take any and all actions deemed appropriate or which may be required in connection
with the foregoing, including but not limited to obtaining notarization of documents
described above or related to the foregoing.
   SYLVIA SUMMERS COUDER 5




---



##### 



Signature of Notary Public  6
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3279 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3279

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that caregivers for 
veterans with serious illnesses are eligible for assistance and support 
        services provided by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2011

  Mr. Reyes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that caregivers for 
veterans with serious illnesses are eligible for assistance and support 
        services provided by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO THE ELIGIBILITY OF CAREGIVERS 
              FOR VETERANS WITH SERIOUS ILLNESSES FOR ASSISTANCE AND 
              SUPPORT SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1720G(a)(2)(B) is amended by inserting 
``illness or'' after ``serious''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to services provided after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 45876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21086]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4334-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

Iowa; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa (FEMA-4334-DR), dated August 27, 2017, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 25, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
August 27, 2017.

    Dubuque and Winneshiek Counties for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-21086 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment, dated April
30, 2018 (this “Amendment”), to the Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”),
is entered into by and between QPAGOS Corporation (the “Corporation”) and Gaston Pereira (the “Executive”).
Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend
the Employment Term set forth in the Agreement for an additional period of one (1) year.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


 


1.       The
Employment Term set forth in Section 1 shall hereupon be extended for a period of one (1) year.


  


2.      
The last sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:


 









“During the Employment Term, the Executive shall,
if requested by the Board, also serve, without additional compensation, as a member of the Board and in such other executive-level
positions or capacities at the Company, its parent company QPAGOS and/or their subsidiaries as may, from time to time, be reasonably
requested by the Board.”


 


3.      
All other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The Agreement, as amended by this Amendment,
constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter thereof.


 


4.      
This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but both of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


5.       This Amendment is made and shall be construed and performed under the laws of the remaining provisions will nevertheless
continue to be valid and enforceable in the State of Delaware without regard to its choice or conflict of law principles.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


 


QPAGOS CORPORATION


 


/s/ Andrey Novikov


By:_____________________________


Name: Andrey Novikov


Title: Chief Operating Officer


 


 


/s/ Gaston Pereira


________________________________


Gaston Pereira
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40564

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAMON LUIS GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:94-CR-24-3

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ramon Luis Garcia appeals his sentence for conspiracy to

possess with the intent to distribute crack cocaine. 

Garcia argues that the district court’s findings of fact and

its reliance on the presentence report (PSR), which the court

adopted, fail to comply with the requirements for attributing a

drug quantity to a defendant in a drug conspiracy. See U.S.S.G.

§ 1B1.3(a). He also argues that the district court clearly erred

by finding that Garcia was a minor participant, not a minimal
No. 97-40564

-2-

participant, pursuant to § 3B1.2. We have carefully reviewed the

record and the appellate briefs. We conclude that the district

court’s findings, concerning the drug quantity for which Garcia

is held accountable, are adequate. See United States v.

Castillo, 77 F.3d 1480, 1495 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct.

180 (1996). The court’s finding as to Garcia’s role in the

offense was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Gaytan,

74 F.3d 545, 561 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 77 (1996).

AFFIRMED.
----

|   | a) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m(a) or      78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the  Report. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February 17,      2009 | /s/ Deborah      C.  Wright |
|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                    | Deborah      C.  Wright     |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Prudential-Bache Capital Return
                    Futures Fund 3 and is qualified in its entirety 
                    by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          

<CIK>               0000857850
<NAME>              Prudential-Bache Capital Return Futures Fund 3
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1998

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1998

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          2,838,700

<SECURITIES>                    10,669,307

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                13,508,007

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  13,508,007

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           816,336

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      12,691,671

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    13,508,007

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                114,375

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,773,767

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (1,659,392)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (17.13)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Torrent Energy
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John D. Carlson, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.

Date: July 12, 2007

/s/ John D. CarlsonSignature: John D.
Carlson Title: President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)

---