alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CIRCUIT COURT OF SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY

#### Sanford S. Schwaber and Lorine Schwaber v. Betty Steele, Jesse Steele, Joseph Steele, Carolina Galleries of Williamsburg, and Carolina Furniture Galleries, Inc.

December 20, 1985

By JUDGE JOHN A. JAMISON

On July 1, 1985, the court heard evidence ore tenus in the above matter.

It appears from the evidence that on May 10, 1983, the Ohio Court of competent jurisdiction entered a default judgment against Jesse Steele, Betty Steele, Joseph Steele, Carolina Galleries of Williamsburg and Carolina Furniture Galleries, Inc. Actual damages of $3,500.00 were awarded, as well as punitive damages of $6,400.00.

The issue before the Circuit Court of Spotsylvania County is whether this court must give full faith and credit both to the judgment of compensatory as well as punitive damages of the Ohio Court and whether or not all defendants named in this suit should be required to answer to the Ohio Court.

The case of *Bloodworth v. Ellis,*221 Va. 18 (1980), clearly places a heavy burden upon a defendant denying the validity of a foreign judgment in Virginia courts. A strong presumption exists that such judgment is entirely valid.

> *275Jurisdiction of the sister-state’s court is presumed unless disproved by extrinsic evidence or the record itself. *Bloodworth, supra,*p. 24.

According to *Nero*v. *Ferris, 222*Va. 807 (1981), a defendant in Virginia does have a right to challenge the sister-state’s jurisdiction to grant judgment.

However, careful analysis of all of the file and the evidence compels me to conclude that there was sufficient involvement by all of the defendants to sustain the Ohio Court’s jurisdiction as to each of them. Therefore, in accordance with Section 8.01-389(B), this court accords full faith and credit to the compensatory damages awarded by the Girard Municipal Court of Trumbull County, Ohio.

The question of punitive damages, however, is yet another matter. It is well established that Virginia courts will not award punitive damages in an action for a breach of contract except in the most exceptional circumstances, not applicable here. Indeed the award of punitive damages in this case would be in violation of Virginia’s clear public policy and cannot be granted in this case.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Thomas Wayne Florence v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-20-00556-CR

Trial court case number: 10-CR-1217

Trial court: 56th District Court of Galveston County

Appellant, Thomas Wayne Florence, has filed a motion for access to the 

supplemental clerk’s record filed on January 4, 2021. Appellant further states that he is 

not able to access an electronic copy of the supplemental clerk’s record and requests to be 

provided with a paper copy of the supplemental clerk’s record. The motion is granted.

We direct the Clerk of this Court to deliver to appellant, at the most recent address 

he has provided, a paper copy of the supplemental clerk’s record filed with this Court on 

January 4, 2021.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ April Farris_______

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___January 21, 2021____
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2644 

To waive the 35-mile rule to permit recognition of Gadsden Community 

Hospital as a critical access hospital under the Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2009 

Mr. BOYD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To waive the 35-mile rule to permit recognition of Gadsden 

Community Hospital as a critical access hospital under 

the Medicare Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF 35-MILE RULE TO PERMIT REC4 OGNITION OF GADSDEN COMMUNITY HOS5 PITAL AS A CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL 

6 UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM. 

7 Gadsden Community Hospital operated by Gadsden 

8 Hospital, Inc. in Quincy, Florida, is deemed to meet the 

9 requirement of section 1820(c)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Social 

10 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i–4(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)) for purVerDate Nov 24 2008 23:08 May 26, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2644.IH H2644

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2644 IH

1 poses of obtaining designation as a critical access hospital 

2 under the Medicare program. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Appian,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Steven R. Fey,
Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ STEVEN R. FEY
------------------------------
Steven R. Fey
Principal Accounting Officer
July 12, 2005

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11216 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
CURTIS RAY DUPREE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-167-1
- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Curtis Ray Dupree appeals his guilty-plea convictions for aiding and abetting and bank robbery on the ground that the district court erred in finding that his prior criminal convictions were not “related” under the Sentencing Guidelines. The guilty plea Dupree entered into with the Government contained a waiver-of-appeal provision whereby Dupree waived his right toNo. 96-11216 - 2 - appeal his sentence except as to an upward departure. We have reviewed the briefs and the record and conclude that the waiver was informed and voluntary and is therefore binding on Dupree. See United States v. Melancon , 972 F.3d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992). His appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. APPEAL DISMISSED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine
months ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 December 5, 2005
    
    /s/ Dean J. DouglasDean J. DouglasPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

                    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called the                           ( print page 46120)                        optional “peg” rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. This rate will be 2.50 percent for the October-December quarter of FY 2018.                

Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for any third party lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the New York Prime rate or, if that exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted by the constitution or laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate will be the rate permitted by the constitution or laws of the given State.

Dianna L. Seaborn,

Director, Office of Financial Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2017-21200 Filed 10-2-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 99.2
   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Lightwave, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
E. Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to {section} 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                        By:   /s/ MARK E. SCOTT
                                              Mark E. Scott
                                              Executive Vice President,Finance,
                                              Chief Financial Officer and
                                              Secretary
                                              (Principal Accounting Officer)

                                              Date: August 14, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21264]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of Microbiology, 
Infectious Diseases and AIDS Initial Review Group Microbiology and 
Infectious Diseases Research Committee.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS 
Initial Review Group; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research 
Committee.
    Date: October 30-31, 2017.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Frank S. De Silva, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, Room #3E72A, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 
Fishers Lane, MSC 9834, Bethesda, MD 20892934, (240) 669-5023, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#680e0c0d1b01041e0928060109010c46060100460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6d0d2d3c5dfdac0d7f6d8dfd7dfd298d8dfde98d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 28, 2017.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-21264 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.24





Exhibit 10.24




Noble Corporation

Summary of Director Compensation




Annual Retainer. Noble Corporation, a Swiss company, (the “Company”) pays each of its
non-employee directors an annual retainer of $50,000 of which 20 percent is paid in shares under
the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Under this plan,
non-employee directors may elect to receive up to all of the remaining 80% in shares or cash.
Non-employee directors make elections on a quarterly basis. The number of shares to be issued
under the plan in any particular quarter is generally determined using the average of the daily
closing prices of the shares for the last 15 consecutive trading days of the previous quarter. No
options are issuable under the plan, and there is no “exercise price” applicable to shares
delivered under the plan.



Board Meeting Fees. In addition, the Company pays its non-employee directors a Board meeting
fee of $2,000. The Company pays each member of its audit committee a committee fee of $2,500 per
meeting and each member of our other committees a committee meeting fee of $2,000 per meeting. The
Company also reimburses directors for travel, lodging and related expenses they may incur in
attending Board and committee meetings.



Committee Fees. The chair of the audit committee and the chair of the nominating and
corporate governance committee each receive an annual retainer of $15,000, the chair of the
compensation committee receives an annual retainer of $12,500 and the chair of each other standing
Board committee receives an annual retainer of $10,000.



Equity Compensation. Under the Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option and
Restricted Share Plan for Nonemployee Directors (the “1992 Plan”) each annually-determined award of
a variable number of restricted shares or unrestricted shares is made on a date selected by the
Board, or if no such date is selected by the Board, the date on which the Board action approving
such award is taken. Any future award of restricted shares will be evidenced by a written
agreement that will include such terms and conditions not inconsistent with the terms and
conditions of the 1992 Plan as the Board considers appropriate in each case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              8,367
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      25,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (228)
<INVENTORY>                                        30,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   65,676
<PP&E>                                             20,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (7,052)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    143,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              23,635
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              67,000
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           18,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      (113,195)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      143,408
<SALES>                                            39,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   39,393
<CGS>                                              23,830
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      23,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    7,828
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  4,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     3,598
<INCOME-TAX>                                        1,433
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        2,165
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

I, Kenneth T. Myers, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form
10-Q of the registrant, Digital Lightwave, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 12, 2009



By:

/s/ KENNETH T. MYERSKenneth T. MyersPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
---

Exhibit 99.15

Professionals in resources, mining, processing, construction and the environment
     www.cam-llc.com
  CONSENT OF EXPERT
February 25, 2010
British Columbia Securities Commission
Alberta Securities Commission
Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission
Manitoba Securities Commission
Ontario Securities Commission
New Brunswick Securities Commission
Nova Scotia Securities Commission
Registrar of Securities, Prince Edward Island
Securities Commission of Newfoundland and Labrador
Registrar of Securities, Northwest Territories
Registrar of Securities, Nunavut
Registrar of Securities, Yukon
United States Securities and Exchange Commission Re:
     Annual Information Form dated February 25, 2010 (the Annual Information Form) of Minefinders Corporation Inc. (the Company).
  We refer to our report entitled "Technical Report Dolores Gold-Silver Project, Chihuahua State, Mexico" dated July 26, 2007 (the "Report") as referenced in the Annual Information Form and documents incorporated by reference therein. We hereby consent to the use of our firm name and our Report in the Annual Information Form and in documents incorporated by reference therein. We confirm that we have read the Annual Information Form and we have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations that are derived from our Report referred to above or that are within our knowledge as a result of the services we performed in connection with such Report. We consent to the filing of this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Companys Form 40-F dated February 25, 2010, and any amendment thereto, including post-effective amendments and as part of a post-effective amendment to the Companys Form F-10, to incorporate the Companys Form 40-F dated February 25, 2010. Yours truly,
CHLUMSKY, ARMBRUST & MEYER, LLC /s/ Kenneth L. MeyerKenneth L. MeyerPrincipal12600 W. Colfax Ave., Suite A-250Lakewood, Colorado 80215Telephone: (303) 716-1617Fax: (303) 716-3386


---