alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 329 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 329

   To amend the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Programs 
 Enhancement Act of 2001 and title 38, United States Code, to require 
  the provision of chiropractic care and services to veterans at all 
Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers and to expand access to 
                        such care and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2011

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Programs 
 Enhancement Act of 2001 and title 38, United States Code, to require 
  the provision of chiropractic care and services to veterans at all 
Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers and to expand access to 
                        such care and services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chiropractic Care Available to All 
Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM FOR PROVISION OF CHIROPRACTIC CARE AND SERVICES TO 
              VETERANS.

    Section 204(c) of the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care 
Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 (38 U.S.C. 1710 note) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``The program''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) The program shall be carried out at not fewer than 75 medical 
centers by not later than December 31, 2012, and at all medical centers 
by not later than December 31, 2014.''.

SEC. 3. EXPANDED CHIROPRACTOR SERVICES AVAILABLE TO VETERANS.

    (a) Medical Services.--Paragraph (6) of section 1701 of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
            ``(H) Chiropractic services.''.
    (b) Rehabilitative Services.--Paragraph (8) of such section is 
amended by inserting ``chiropractic,'' after ``counseling,''.
    (c) Preventive Health Services.--Paragraph (9) of such section is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (F) through (K) as 
        subparagraphs (G) through (L), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following new 
        subparagraph (F):
            ``(F) periodic and preventative chiropractic examinations 
        and services;''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2663 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase certain infrastructure 

finance provisions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2009 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase certain 

infrastructure finance provisions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transportation Infra5 structure Finance and Innovation Act of 2009’’ or 

6 ‘‘TIFIA of 2009’’. 

7 SEC. 2. SECURED LOANS. 

8 (a) MAXIMUM AMOUNT.—Section 603(b) of title 23, 

9 United States Code, is amended as follows: 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2663 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘33’’ and in2 serting ‘‘49’’; and 

3 (2) in paragraph (6) by inserting after ‘‘project 

4 obligations’’ the following: ‘‘entered into after (not 

5 including such obligations issued to refund prior 

6 project obligations), or not contemplated by the par7 ties at the time, the agreement to provide the se8 cured loan is entered into under this section’’. 

9 SEC. 3. LINES OF CREDIT. 

10 Section 604(b) of title 23, United States Code, is 

11 amended as follows: 

12 (1) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘33’’ and in13 serting ‘‘49’’; and 

14 (2) in paragraph (8) by inserting after ‘‘project 

15 obligations’’ the following: ‘‘entered into after (not 

16 including such obligations issued to refund prior 

17 project obligations), or not contemplated by the par18 ties at the time, the agreement to provide the line 

19 of credit is entered into under this section’’. 

20 SEC. 4. FUNDING. 

21 Section 608(a) of title 23, United States Code, is 

22 amended as follows: 

23 (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘each of fiscal 

24 years 2005 through 2009.’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2663 IH

1 year 2009 and $285,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

2 2010 through 2015.’’; and 

3 (2) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘each of fiscal 

4 years 2005 through 2009.’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal 

5 year 2009 and $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

6 2010 through 2015.’’ 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

IGNACIO GONZALEZ, AKA Pelon, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-10236 

D.C. No. 4:16-cr-00382-HSG-14 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 9, 2020**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Ignacio Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion 

for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand. 

Gonzalez argues that, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and his health 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 17 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-10236 

conditions, the district court should have granted compassionate release. The

parties agree, and the record reflects, that the district court incorrectly concluded 

that Gonzalez had not submitted evidence of his obesity. Because the court might 

have reached a different conclusion as to whether Gonzalez had demonstrated an 

“extraordinary and compelling reason” for reducing his sentence, 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), had it considered Gonzalez’s obesity in combination with his 

other health problems, we vacate the district court’s order and remand for further 

proceedings.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

David Earl Resendez, * From the 266th District

 Court of Erath County,

 Trial Court No. CR13525.

Vs. No. 11-12-00080-CR * March 6, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
|   | (1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") of The Savannah Bancorp, Inc. (the Company")  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                                                                                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:    3/31/11                                 | /s/ John C. Helmken IIJohn C. Helmken IIPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)               |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                                                                                                     |
| Date:    3/31/11                                 | /s/ Michael W. Harden, Jr.Michael W. Harden, Jr.Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 28, 2013

s1021

Order 

Clerk

October 28, 2013

147397

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147397

COA: 315509

Wayne CC: 12-006038-FC

STANLEY TUCKER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 12.1**

*CERTIFICATION(302)*

 

I, John McFarlane, certifythat:

 

1.            I have reviewed this annual report on Form20-F of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited – the registrant;

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this annual report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

 

4.            The registrant’s other certifying officers andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)            designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

b)           evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)            disclosed in this annual report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe period covered by this annual reporting that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;

 

5.            The registrant’s other certifying officers andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)            all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.

 

Dated: December 17, 2004

 

 
| /s/  J McFarlane        |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| **J  McFarlane**        |   |
|                    |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

----
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00019

- CV

CHERIE ALLEN APPELLANT

V.

CITY OF FORT WORTH A ND TA RRANT COUNTY DISTRIC T CLERK’ S OFFICE APPELLEES

----------
FROM THE 236TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 236

- 282171

- 15

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Cherie Allen attempts to appeal from the trial court’s December
22, 2015 “Order Denying Motion to Recuse.” On January 19, 2016, we informed
appellant of our concern that we lacke d jurisdiction over the appeal because the
trial court’s order did not appear to be a final judgment or an appealable

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

interlocutory order. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39
S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). We informed appellant that h er appeal was
subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless she or any party desiring to
continue the appeal filed with the court, on or before January 29, 2016, a
response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
42.3(a), 44. 3. No response has been filed. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for
want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth BONNIE SUDDERTH JUSTICE
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 3, 2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of RTCA charter renewal.

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the renewal of the RTCA Charter (FAA Order 1110.77X) for 6 months, effective September 29, 2017. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is authorized to establish the RTCA advisory committee in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). The current charter agreement requires that the RTCA manage various Federal subcommittees on behalf of the agency.

The objective of the advisory committee is to seek resolution of issues and challenges involving air transportation concepts, requirements, operational capabilities, the associated use of technology, and related considerations to aeronautical operations that affect the future of the Air Traffic Management System and the integration of new technologies.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Andy Cebula at                         *acebula@rtca.org*                         or (202) 330-0652, or the RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at                         *http://www.rtca.org.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public and announced in the                     **Federal Register**                    , except as authorized by Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.                

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 26, 2017.

Mohannad Dawoud,

Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17, NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation Administration.

[FR Doc. 2017-20898 Filed 9-28-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Office of Science, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Notice of Renewal.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and in accordance with Title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee will be renewed for a two-year period beginning on June 30, 2017.

The Committee will provide advice to the Director, Office of Science (DOE), on the Advanced Scientific Computing Research Program managed by the Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research.

Additionally, the renewal of the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee has been determined to be essential to the conduct of the Department of Energy business and to be in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Department of Energy, by law and agreement. The Committee will operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, adhering to the rules and regulations in implementation of that Act.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Christine Chalk at (301) 903-5152,                         *christine.chalk@science.doe.gov.*

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 30, 2017.

Shena Kennerly,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

              Editorial Note            

#### Editorial Note:

This document was received for publication by the Office of the Federal Register on September 29, 2017.

[FR Doc. 2017-21328 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
EX-10.19(e)



 Exhibit 10.19(e) 

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT 

THIS Amendment No. 4 to Exclusive License Agreement (“Amendment No. 4”) is made and entered into this 15th day of
September 2016 (“Effective Date of Amendment No. 4”), by and between the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (“Mayo”) having its principal place of business at 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905,
and Unity Biotechnology, Inc. (formerly known as Cenexys, Inc.), a Delaware corporation, having a place of business at 3280 Bayshore Blvd, Brisbane (“Company”), for purposes of confirming the parties’ intent and agreement as set forth
herein. 
 BACKGROUND 
 Mayo and Company are
parties to an Exclusive License Agreement, with an effective date of the 28th day of June, 2013 (“Agreement”), which confirms the parties’ intent and agreement to grant an exclusive
license to Mayo’s certain patent rights and a nonexclusive license to certain know-how along with Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2, and Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement. Mayo and Company
agree that there is no need to amend Exhibit C listing the proprietary research tools. Mayo and Company wish to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment No. 4, and, accordingly, Mayo and Company agree as follows: 

AMENDED TERMS 
 1.
    Exhibit A in its entirety will be deleted and replaced with the exhibit attached to this Amendment No. 4. 
 All
other terms of the Agreement and Amendment No. 3 shall remain in full force and effect for the term of the Agreement and as set forth in the Agreement. 

  
 [***] Certain information in this
document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mayo and Company hereby enter into this Amendment No. 4, effective as of the date first
set forth above. 
  

									
	Unity Biotechnology, Inc.	 		 	Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Nathaniel E. David
	 	        	 	By:	 	 /s/ Daniel D. Estes

		 		 		 	Name:	 	Daniel D. Estes
		 		 		 	Title:	 	Assistant Treasurer


  
 [***] Certain information in this
document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. 








 EXHIBIT A 

PATENT RIGHTS 
 [***] 

  
 [***] Certain information in this
document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.