alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3183 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3183

    To amend title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act to exempt 
 licensed independent insurance producer remuneration from the medical 
                              loss ratio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 13, 2011

 Mr. Yarmuth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act to exempt 
 licensed independent insurance producer remuneration from the medical 
                              loss ratio.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTING LICENSED INDEPENDENT INSURANCE PRODUCER 
              REMUNERATION FROM THE MEDICAL LOSS RATIO.

    (a) In General.--Section 2718 of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 300gg et seq.), as inserted by section 1001 and amended by 
section 10101(f) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
(Public Law 111-148), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(3), by inserting ``, remuneration 
        paid for licensed independent insurance producers,'' after 
        ``State taxes'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(1)(A), in the matter preceding clause 
        (i), by inserting ``, remuneration paid for licensed 
        independent insurance producers,'' after ``State taxes'';
            (3) in subsection (b)(1)(B), by inserting ``, remuneration 
        paid for licensed independent insurance producers,'' after 
        ``State taxes''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Independent Insurance Producer, Remuneration Defined.--For 
purposes of this section:
            ``(1) The term `independent insurance producer' means an 
        insurance agent or broker, insurance consultant, benefit 
        specialist, limited insurance representative, and any other 
        person required to be licensed under the laws of the particular 
        State to sell, solicit, negotiate, service, effect, procure, 
        renew or bind policies of insurance coverage or offer advice, 
        counsel, opinions, or services related to insurance.
            ``(2) The term `remuneration' means compensation paid by or 
        accrued from an insurance issuer or health plan for services 
        rendered under contractual agreement which may include fees, 
        commissions, or rebates.''.
    (b) Regulations.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
amend any applicable regulations so as to take the amendments made by 
subsection (a) into account.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,452
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,281
<INVENTORY>                                      6,554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,647
<PP&E>                                           6,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,888
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           151
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,016
<SALES>                                         43,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,163
<CGS>                                           28,092
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,313
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,313
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,687
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,585
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,102
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,102
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3335 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3335

    To make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
  available at a discount to members of the Armed Forces and veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2011

Mr. Bilirakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
  available at a discount to members of the Armed Forces and veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Parks Freedom Pass Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL PARKS AND FEDERAL RECREATIONAL LANDS PASS FOR MEMBERS 
              OF THE ARMED FORCES AND VETERANS.

    Section 805(b) of division J of the Consolidated Appropriations 
Act, 2005 (16 U.S.C. 6804(b)), is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(3) Military discount.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall make the 
                National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
                available to any member of the Armed Forces or any 
                member of the National Guard or Reserves at a reduced 
                rate equal to 50 percent of the cost of the National 
                Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass to the public 
                established under subsection (a)(5).
                    ``(B) Term.--A National Parks and Federal 
                Recreational Lands Pass issued under this paragraph 
                shall be valid for 1 year after the date of issuance of 
                the pass.
            ``(4) Veteran discount.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall make the 
                National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
                available, at a cost of $10, to any veteran who was 
                separated from military service under conditions other 
                than dishonorable, if the veteran provides proof of 
                that status by providing a copy of the Certificate of 
                Release or Discharge from Active Duty (Department of 
                Defense form DD214) of the veteran.
                    ``(B) Term.--A National Parks and Federal 
                Recreational Lands Pass issued under this paragraph 
                shall be valid for the lifetime of the passholder.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 <ARTICLE>              5
 <LEGEND>
     UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT 6/30/98
 </LEGEND>
 <CIK>                  0001016275
 <NAME>                 GEO PETROLEUM, INC.
        
 <S>                                       <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
 <PERIOD-START>                            APR-01-1998
 <PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
 <CASH>                                      104,304
 <SECURITIES>                                      0
 <RECEIVABLES>                                96,786
 <ALLOWANCES>                                522,444
 <INVENTORY>                                       0
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                            328,553
 <PP&E>                                    6,600,498
 <DEPRECIATION>                           (1,253,001)
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                            6,071,032
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     1,752,730
 <BONDS>                                           0
 <COMMON>                                  7,049,399
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
 <PREFERRED>                                       0
 <OTHER-SE>                               (2,731,098)
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              6,071,032
 <SALES>                                     175,581
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                            179,900
 <CGS>                                       131,241
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                               203,247
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,089
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                            (155,678)
 <INCOME-TAX>                                      0
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
 <DISCONTINUED>                                    0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
 <CHANGES>                                         0
 <NET-INCOME>                               (155,678)
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.02)
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.02)
         
 
</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

The Boeing Company ) ASBCA No. 62564

)

Under Contract No. W58RGZ-14-D-0045 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Scott M. McCaleb, Esq. 

Scott A. Felder, Esq.

 Wiley Rein LLP

 Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

 Army Chief Trial Attorney

Robert B. Neill, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: August 10, 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62564, Appeal of The Boeing 

Company, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: August 11, 2021

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6483
DAVID CHAPMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR TRIPLETT; AL CANNON, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-04-363-8-18BI) Submitted: August 12, 2005 Decided: August 29, 2005 Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Holmes Hood, Jr., Roy Pearce Maybank, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, Hugh Willcox Buyck, BUYCK LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, Sandra Jane Senn, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: David Chapman appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Chapman v. Triplett , No. CA-04-363-8-18BI (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
February 3, 2016

STATE OF MINNESOTA 

IN SUPREME COURT 

Al6-0066 

In rePetition for Disciplinary Action against 

Jorge Luis Sanchez, a Minnesota Attorney, 

Registration No. 0388556. 

ORDER 

ORmiEOF 

AJII!IB.lAJECcuns 

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a 

petition for disciplinary action seeking reciprocal discipline under Rule 12( d), Rules on 

Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), based on an order of the Nevada Supreme 

Court suspending respondent Jorge Luis Sanchez for 5 years, effective as of December 8, 

2014, followed by 3 years of probation if he is reinstated to the practice of law. See In re 

Sanchez, No. 67182,2015 WL 5568072, at* 1-2 (Nev. Sept. 21, 2015) (order). The Nevada 

suspension was based on Sanchez's admissions that he violated Nev. R. Prof. Conduct 1.1, 

1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.15, 1.16, 1.17, 3.2, 8.1(b), and 8.4. Sanchez, 2015 WL 5568072, at *1. 

The Director and respondent have entered into a stipulation in which respondent 

unconditionally admits the allegations in the petition for disciplinary action and waives his 

rights under Rule 12(d), RLPR. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate 

discipline is reciprocal discipline. 

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly 

recommended disposition. 

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, 

1 
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Respondent Jorge Luis Sanchez is indefinitely suspended from the practice 

of law, effective as of December 8, 2014, with no right to petition for reinstatement until 5 

years after the beginning of his suspension; 

2. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of 

suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs pursuant 

to Rule 24, RLPR; 

3. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18( a)-( e), RLPR. 

Reinstatement is conditioned on: (a) successful completion of the professional 

responsibility portion of the state bar examination; (b) satisfaction of continuing legal 

education requirements pursuant to Rule 18( e), RLPR; and (c) compliance with all the 

conditions set forth in the Nevada Supreme Court's September 21, 2015, order suspending 

respondent, except that respondent is not required to take and pass the Minnesota state bar 

examination in order to be reinstated; 

4. If respondent is reinstated in Nevada before he is reinstated in Minnesota, 

then at the time respondent seeks reinstatement in Minnesota, the parties may recommend 

that the reinstatement hearing in Rule 18, RLPR, be waived. The court retains the authority 

to decide if the reinstatement hearing shall be waived; and 

5. If respondent is reinstated in Minnesota, he will be subject to at least 3 years 

of supervised probation. 

2 
Dated: February 3, 2016 

3 

BY THE COURT: 

David R. Stras 

Associate Justice
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                            CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,              SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                     --------------------------------------   -----------------------------------
                                                            2002                 2001               2002               2001
                                                     -----------------    -----------------   ----------------   ----------------
                                                       BASIC   DILUTED      BASIC   DILUTED    BASIC   DILUTED    BASIC   DILUTED
                                                     --------  -------    --------  -------   -------  -------   -------  -------
<S>                                                  <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>
Net Earnings                                         $  1,974  $ 1,974    $  2,129  $ 2,129   $ 1,646  $ 1,646   $ 2,953  $ 2,953
                                                     ========  =======    ========  =======   =======  =======   =======  =======

Shares used in computing net earnings per share:
   Weighted average common shares and
    common share equivalents                           14,121   14,121      10,230   10,230    14,091   14,091    10,206   10,206

   Less treasury shares                                (1,117)  (1,117)       (993)    (993)   (1,113)  (1,113)     (974)   (974)

   Effect of shares issuable under stock options
    and warrants based on the treasury stock method         -      303           -      438         -      428         -      320
                                                     --------  -------    --------  -------   -------  -------   -------  -------
                                                       13,004   13,307       9,237    9,675    12,978   13,406     9,232    9,552
                                                     --------  -------    --------  -------   -------  -------   -------  -------

 Net earnings per share                              $   0.15  $  0.15    $   0.23  $  0.22   $  0.13  $  0.12   $  0.32  $  0.31
                                                     ========  =======    ========  =======   =======  =======   =======  =======
</Table>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-67,646-04

EX PARTE ALBERT CHARLES MCKINNEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 20260-D IN THE 336TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM FANNIN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of felony driving

while intoxicated and sentenced to imprisonment. 

Applicant raises a time-credit claim, arguing that 6 months and 17 days has been added to

his sentence. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Spann,

132 S.W.3d 390 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As

we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the

appropriate forum for findings of fact.
2

The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General

Counsel to file an affidavit addressing Applicant’s claim that he is being denied time credit on his

sentence. The affidavit shall also indicate whether Applicant has submitted the claim to the time

credit resolution system of TDCJ, and if so, the date when the claim was submitted.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

has properly exhausted his administrative remedies as required byTEX.GOV’TCODE §501.0081(b)-

(c). The trial court shall then make findings and conclusions as to whether Applicant is receiving

the proper amount of time credit on his sentence. The trial court shall also make any other findings

of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s

claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: January 30, 2019

Do not publish
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of W-Waves USA, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roger Boileau, Secretary and Acting Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  July 23, 2004

By: /s/ Roger Boileau

Name: Roger Boileau

Title:  Secretary and Acting Chief Financial Officer