alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.7



AMENDMENT THREE
TO 
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL CASH BALANCE PLAN
WHEREAS, The Coca-Cola Company sponsors The Coca-Cola Company Supplemental Pension Plan (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, The Coca-Cola Company Benefits Committee (the “Benefits Committee”) may amend the Plan at any time;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows, effective as provided herein:


		
	1.
	Effective March 23, 2018, a new Section 7.6 Restriction on Venue shall be added following Section 7.5, and the following paragraphs shall be renumbered accordingly:




“7.6    Restriction on Venue. Any legal action in connection with the Plan by an Employee, Participant, Beneficiary, Joint Annuitant, or other interested party shall only be brought in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in Atlanta, Georgia.”


		
	2.
	Effective March 23, 2018, the following sentence shall be added to the end of Section 6.4.




“All suits must be brought in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in Atlanta, Georgia in accordance with Section 7.6.”


		
	3.
	Effective April 28, 2018, the following shall be added to Appendix A: Business Services North America, LLC




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Benefits Committee has caused this Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized member as of this      day of March 2018.


THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
BENEFITS COMMITTEE




BY:_________________________________
Allison O’Sullivan
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of netGuru, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 14, 2003                      By: /s/ AMRIT K. DAS
                                                 -----------------
                                                   Amrit K. Das
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (principal executive officer)

Dated: November 14, 2003                      By: /s/ BRUCE NELSON
                                                 -----------------
                                                   Bruce Nelson
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (principal financial officer)

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Signal Investment & Management Co.'s audited financial statements and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,911
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,198
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         75,713
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,284
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,411
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,575
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,039
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,039
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    12.16
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 9

KPMG LLP

   Telephone        (604) 691-3000Chartered Accountants

   Fax                     (604) 691-3031PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street

   Internet             www.kpmg.caVancouver BC V7Y 1K3Canada
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors Minefinders Corporation Ltd. We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of: Our Independent Auditors Report dated February 23, 2012 on the consolidated financial statements, which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position of Minefinders Corporation Ltd. (the Company) as at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and January 1, 2010, the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information; andour Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 23, 2012 on the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports  in the registration statement (No. 333-170839) on Form F-10 and the registration statement (No. 175738) on Form S-8 of the Company. /s/ KPMG LLP
  Chartered Accountants Vancouver, Canada February 23, 2012 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership is the Canadianmember firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of ING Insurance
Company of America (the "Company") hereby certifies that, to the officer's
knowledge, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date March 28, 2005
     ---------------                By /s/  David A. Wheat
                                      --------------------
                                      David A. Wheat
                                      Director, Senior Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer

                                       71
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Office of Science, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Notice of renewal.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, App. 2, and Code of Federal Regulations, and following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the DOE/NSF High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP) has been renewed for a two-year period.

The Panel will provide advice and recommendations to the Director, Office of Science (DOE), and the Assistant Director, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (NSF), on scientific priorities within the field of high energy physics.

Additionally, the Secretary of Energy has determined that renewal of the HEPAP is essential to conduct business of the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation and is in the public interest in connection with the performance duties imposed by law upon the Department of Energy. The Committee will continue to operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of Energy Organization Act (Pub. L. 95-91), and the rules and regulations in implementation of these acts.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. John Boger at (301) 903-4520.

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 11, 2017.

Shena Kennerly,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-21346 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Exhibit 23



     Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of The Reader's Digest Association, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos.
33-37434, 33-56883, 333-57789, 333-42726, 333-105325, 333-105326, and 333-105327
on Form S-8 of The Reader's Digest Association, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) of our report dated August 30 , 2004, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of the Company as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2004, which
report is incorporated by reference in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended June 30, 2004.


/s/ KPMG LLP



New York, New York
September 7 , 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence A. Denton, President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Lawrence A. Denton
    ------------------
Lawrence A. Denton
President,
Chief Executive Officer and
Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
November 8, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-1185 (Review)]

## Determination

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on steel nails from the United Arab Emirates would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted this review on April 3, 2017 (82 FR 16229) and determined on July 7, 2017 that it would conduct an expedited review (82 FR 37112, August 8, 2017).

                    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determination in this review on September 29, 2017. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4729 (September 2017), entitled                     *Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates:*                     Investigation No. 731-TA-1185 (Review).                

By order of the Commission.

Issued: September 29, 2017.

Lisa R. Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2017-21427 Filed 10-4-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 60361 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
BILLY RAY CRAWFORD , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:13

- CR

- 10

- 11

Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Billy Ray Crawford appeals his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess pseudoephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine. Specifically, he contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance in
connection with his guilty plea and plea agreement. In Crawford’s plea agreement, he waived “the right to appeal the conviction and sentence imposed in this case, or the manner in which that

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 11, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-60361 Document: 00513416158 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2016No. 15

- 60361

2 sentence was imposed . . . on any ground whatsoever.” However, Crawford argues that the appeal wai ver is not enforceable because trial counsel was ineffective in explaining the agreement. Crawford also raises other ineffective assistance claims related to the guilty plea. The Government seeks to enforce the appeal waiver and moves for dismissal of th e appeal or, alternatively, summary affirmance. To determine whether an appeal of a sentence is barred by an appeal waiver provision in a plea agreement, this court analyzes whether the waiver was knowing and voluntary and whether the waiver applies to th e circumstances at hand, based on the plain language of the agreement. See United States v. Bond , 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir. 2005). For an appeal waiver to be knowing and voluntary, the defendant must know that he had a right to appeal and that he was g iving up that right. United States v. Portillo , 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994). In this instance, the record shows that Crawford’s appeal wai ver was knowing and voluntary. Crawford’s challenge to the validity of the appeal waiver rests entirely
on cl aims of ineffective assistance of counsel. However, b ecause the record is not sufficiently developed to allow for a fair consideration of these claims, we decline to consider them on direct appeal without prejudice to any right Crawford has to ra ise them on collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F. 3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, the Government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED , and the appeal is DISMISSED. The Government’s alternative motion for summary affirmance is DENIED

. Case: 15-60361 Document: 00513416158 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2016
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7174

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ISAAC J. PEAR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CR-92-445, CA-98-1245-2-8)

Submitted: February 29, 2000 Decided: August 30, 2000

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaac J. Pear, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Howe Hendricks, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Isaac J. Pear seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. Pear failed to show that he

was entitled to relief as a result of his counsel’s performance.

See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984); Hill v.

Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). Even assuming there was error in

the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, such error was harmless. See Fed.

R. Crim. P. 11(h). Finally, the district court did not err in

declining to force the Government to file a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35

motion on Pear’s behalf. We dispense with oral argument and deny

Pear’s motion for the appointment of counsel at the Government’s

expense because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,294,632
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     390,104,044
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               500,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 35,548,998
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     110,292,914
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       106,888,000
<LOANS>                                    238,674,632
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,582,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             415,569,399
<DEPOSITS>                                 269,834,651
<SHORT-TERM>                               106,035,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,436,291
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,674,924
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,144
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,909,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             415,569,399
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,532,374
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,591,122
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                22,877
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,146,372
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,171,630
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,827,536
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,318,836
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  170,837
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,902,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                598,516
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     598,516
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   329,416
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.33
<LOANS-NON>                                  4,048,022
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,297,687
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               412,500
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                412,500
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,413,102
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,582,535
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,582,535
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>