alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
UNAUDITED  CONDENSED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S  SEPT 30,
2000,  QUARTERLY  REPORT ON FORM  10-QSB AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>         0001016028
<NAME>       Cybercosmetics, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                        31
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              31
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                31
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1,838
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      2,042
<OTHER-SE>                                   (3,849)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  31
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              0
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              1,043
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,043)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,043)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,043)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.00)


</TABLE>
#### Robert E. Kodsi, Appellant, v Steven T. Gee et al., Respondents.

[864 NYS2d 9]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Edmead, J.), entered May 1, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiffs cross motion for an order protecting the confidentiality of certain documents and granted defendants’ motion directing their unprotected production, unanimously modified, on the law, the motion denied and the cross motion granted with respect to plaintiff’s tax returns, as indicated herein, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Domestic Relations Law § 235 (1) mandates that all papers filed in a matrimonial matter be designated as confidential. That did not require the court, in this legal malpractice action, to issue an order protecting from outside disclosure all documents requested by defendants that were submitted in connection with the underlying divorce action. The instant malpractice action alleges that defendants failed to secure an uncontested divorce, causing plaintiff to sustain substantial economic damages. The shield afforded by section 235 must, in this instance, give way to the disclosure of relevant evidence needed for the *614defense against such claims, including records filed in the divorce proceeding that may provide evidence to rebut plaintiffs contentions of liability and the extent of his financial loss *(see Janecka v Casey,*121 AD2d 28 [1986]).

The court did abuse its discretion, however, to the extent it denied an order to protect the confidentiality of plaintiffs tax returns—specifically, his federal and state returns and W-2 statements for the years 2002 to 2007. Given the policy disfavoring disclosure of tax returns *(see Williams v New York City Hous. Auth.,*22 AD3d 315 [2005]), plaintiffs cross motion should have been granted *(see e.g. Foley v Kaplan,*162 AD2d 155 [1990]).

The court is directed to issue an order adopting the language of plaintiffs proposed order, providing that plaintiffs tax returns alone shall be designated as “confidential” documents protected from disclosure, discussion or use by anyone except counsel for the named parties, consultants, experts or investigators retained to assist in the preparation and presentation of the claims or defenses, any person who prepared each particular document or to whom copies were addressed or delivered, court personnel, and disciplinary committees. The order should further require that before disclosing the tax returns to others, defendants must first provide plaintiff with the name, address and occupation of each proposed recipient, and if plaintiff objects and the parties are unable to resolve the dispute, defendants must seek a ruling from the court. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Friedman and Acosta, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2739 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2739

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat trees and vines 
producing fruit, nuts, or other crops as placed in service in the year 
     in which it is planted for purposes of special allowance for 
                             depreciation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2009

 Mr. Thompson of California (for himself, Mr. Radanovich, Mr. Meek of 
Florida, and Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat trees and vines 
producing fruit, nuts, or other crops as placed in service in the year 
     in which it is planted for purposes of special allowance for 
                             depreciation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLACED IN SERVICE DATE FOR TREES AND VINES FOR PURPOSES OF 
              SPECIAL ALLOWANCE FOR DEPRECIATION.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (k) of section 168 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(5) Special rule for certain trees and vines.--For 
        purposes of this subsection, in the case of any qualified 
        property which is a tree or vine producing fruit, nuts, or 
        other crops, such property shall be treated as placed in 
        service in the year in which it is planted.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mitchell K. Dauerman, Chief Financial Officer of The Ultimate Software Group, Inc., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.




/s/ Mitchell K. Dauerman










23
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The notice of an open meeting scheduled for October 20, 2017 published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 27, 2017 (82 FR 44995) has a new start time. The time has changed to 09:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mrs. Deadra K. Ghostlaw, the Designated Federal Officer for the committee, in writing at: Secretary of the General Staff, ATTN: Deadra K. Ghostlaw, 646 Swift Road, West Point, NY 10996; by email at:                         *deadra.ghostlaw@usma.edu*                         or                         *BoV@usma.edu;*                         or by telephone at (845) 938-4200.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-21573 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 5001-03-P
* The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-2143

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * Roberto Arteaga-Mendez, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 9, 2005 Filed: May 16, 2005

___________ Before BENTON, LAY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Roberto Arteaga-Mendez pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. In the written plea agreement, Arteaga-Mendez stipulated that he was responsible for between 500 grams and 1.5 kilograms of methamphetamine. Based on this drug quantity, the district court * sentenced ArteagaMendez to 135 months in prison, fifteen months more than the statutory mandatory minimum sentence.-2- Arteaga-Mendez appeals his sentence, arguing the Government failed to establish a factual basis for his plea. Based on Arteaga-Mendez’s responses during the plea colloquy, the written plea agreement, and the agreement’s stipulation of facts, however, the district court could reasonably decide Arteaga-Mendez likely committed the offense. See United States v. Gamble , 327 F.3d 662, 664 (8 th Cir. 2003). Although he made no objection in the district court, Arteaga-Mendez also challenges the district court’s finding of drug quantity. The district court did not commit plain error because its drug quantity finding is based on Arteaga-Mendez’s drug quantity stipulation and the unchallenged drug quantity calculation contained in the PSR. See United States v. Beatty , 9 F.3d 686, 690 (8 thCir. 1993). We note Arteaga-Mendez does not raise any argument under United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). We thus affirm Arteaga-Mendez’s sentence.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                       820
<INVENTORY>                                     78,478
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,497
<PP&E>                                          61,188
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 281,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,908
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,747
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   281,603
<SALES>                                         78,463
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,463
<CGS>                                           38,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,983
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,990
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,442
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,442
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 12** **Computation    of Ratios**          Basic Earnings Per Share     =     Net Income/Average Common Shares Outstanding    Diluted Earnings Per Share     =     Net Income/Average Diluted Shares Outstanding    Cash Dividends Per Share     =     Dividends Paid/Average Common Shares Outstanding    Book Value Per Share     =     Total Shareholders’ Equity/Average Common Shares Outstanding    Return on Average Assets     =     Net Income/Average Assets    Return on Average Assets — Continuing     =     Net Income from Continuing Operations/Average Assets    Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity     =     Net Income/Average Shareholders’ Equity    Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity —    Continuing     =     Income from Continuing Operations/Average Shareholders’    Equity    Efficiency Ratio     =     Noninterest Expense/(Net Interest Income Plus Noninterest Income)    Loans to Deposits     =     Average Net Loans/Average Deposits Outstanding    Dividend Payout     =     Dividends Declared/Net Income    Average Shareholders’ Equity to Average Assets     =     Average Shareholders’ Equity/Average Assets    Tier I Capital Ratio     =     Shareholders’ Equity - Intangible Assets - Securities    Mark-to-market Capital Reserve (Tier I Capital)/ Risk    Adjusted Assets    Total Capital Ratio     =     Tier I Capital Plus Allowance for Loan Losses/Risk Adjusted    Assets    Tier I Leverage Ratio     =     Tier I Capital/Average Assets    Net Charge-offs to Average Loans     =     (Gross Charge-offs Less Recoveries)/Average Net Loans    Non-performing Loans to Total Loans     =     (Nonaccrual Loans Plus Loans Past Due 90 Days or    Greater)/Gross Loans Net of Unearned Interest)    Non-performing Assets to Total Loans Plus OREO     =     (Nonaccrual Loans Plus Loans Past Due 90 Days or Greater    Plus OREO)/Total Loans plus OREO    Allowance for Loan Losses to Total Loans     =     Allowance for Loan Losses/(Gross Loans Net of Unearned Interest)    Allowance for Loan Losses to Non-performing Assets     =     Allowance for Loan Losses/(Nonaccrual Loans plus Loans Past Due    90 days or Greater plus OREO)    Allowance for Loan Losses to Non-performing Loans     =     Allowance for Loan Losses/(Nonaccrual Loans plus Performing    Loans)    Net Interest Margin     =     Tax Equivalent Net Interest Income/Average Earning Assets    Basic Earnings Per Share — Continuing     =     Income from Continuing Operations/Average Common Shares    Diluted Earnings Per Share — Continuing     =     Income from Continuing Operations/Average Diluted Shares
|                             |         | Percentage |         | Jurisdiction      or State |
|----------------------------------|--------------|------------|--------------|----------------------------|
| Subsidiaries                     |         | Owned      |         | of Incorporation      |
|                             |         |       |         |                       |
| Provident      Community Bank    |         | 100%       |         | United      States         |
|                             |         |       |         |                       |
| Provident      Community         |         |       |         |                       |
| Bancshares      Capital Trust I  |         | 100%       |         | Delaware                   |
|                             |         |       |         |                       |
| Provident      Community         |         |       |         |                       |
| Bancshares      Capital Trust II |    | 100%       |    | Delaware                   |

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3268 

To clarify the application of certain Federal laws relating to elections to 

American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, 

Guam, and the United States Virgin Islands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 26, 2011 

Mr. SABLAN (for himself, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. PIERLUISI, Ms. 

BORDALLO, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Ms. NORTON, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. CLAY, Ms. MOORE, Mr. TOWNS, 

and Mr. BUTTERFIELD) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 

House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To clarify the application of certain Federal laws relating 

to elections to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of 

the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and the United 

States Virgin Islands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3268 IH

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF APPLICATION OF FEDERAL 

2 ELECTION LAWS TO CERTAIN JURISDIC3 TIONS. 

4 (a) FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN ACT OF 1971.— 

5 Section 301(12) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 

6 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(12)) is amended by striking ‘‘or a 

7 territory or possession of the United States’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern 

9 Mariana Islands, Guam, or the United States Virgin Is10 lands’’. 

11 (b) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.— 

12 (1) INTIMIDATION OF VOTERS.—Section 594 of 

13 title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 

14 ‘‘Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resi15 dent Commissioner,’’ and inserting ‘‘or Delegate or 

16 Resident Commissioner to the Congress’’. 

17 (2) INTERFERENCE BY GOVERNMENT EMPLOY18 EES.—Section 595 of title 18, United States Code, 

19 is amended by striking ‘‘Delegate from the District 

20 of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner,’’ and insert21 ing ‘‘or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the 

22 Congress’’. 

23 (3) VOTING BY ALIENS.—Section 611(a) of title 

24 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 

25 ‘‘Delegate from the District of Columbia, or ResiVerDate Mar 15 2010 01:57 Oct 27, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3268.IH H3268

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3268 IH

1 dent Commissioner,’’ and inserting ‘‘or Delegate or 

2 Resident Commissioner to the Congress’’. 

3 (c) VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965.—Section 11 of the 

4 Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973i) is amended 

5 by striking ‘‘Delegate from the District of Columbia, 

6 Guam, or the Virgin Islands, or Resident Commissioner 

7 of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’’ each place it ap8 pears in subsections (c) and (e)(2) and inserting ‘‘or Dele9 gate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31(b)



---

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard H. Flake, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Provident Community Bancshares, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |                                          |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: March 20, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    Richard H. Flake                 
|                     |  |  |  | Richard H. Flake Chief Financial
Officer