alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         October 2, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 26, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add First-Class Package Service Contract 82 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2017-212, CP2017-320.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-21016 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 7.1

COMPUTATION OF NET DEBT TO SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY RATIO

Computation of net debt to equity
ratio

The computation of net debt to equity ratio as at March 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:



|                                            |  |                  |           |  |      |  |           | 
|------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | --------- |  | ---- |  | --------- | 
|                                            |  | As at March 31,  |          
|                                            |  | 2016             |           |  | 2015 | 
|                                            |  | (Rs. in million) |          
|Long-term debt                              |  |                  | 504,511.3 |  |      |  | 544,862.5 | 
|Short-term debt (including current portion) |  |                  | 187,856.5 |  |      |  | 180,465.4 | 
|Total debt (A)                              |  |                  | 692,367.8 |  |      |  | 725,327.9 | 
|Cash and cash equivalents                   |  |                  | 171,536.1 |  |      |  | 197,430.9 | 
|Mutual fund (current portion)               |  |                  | 192,329.9 |  |      |  | 140,685.7 | 
|Total investible surplus (B)                |  |                  | 363,866.0 |  |      |  | 338,116.6 | 
|Net Debt (A-B)                              |  |                  | 328,501.8 |  |      |  | 387,211.3 | 
|Equity (including minority interest)        |  |                  | 768,036.7 |  |      |  | 539,351.8 | 
|Net debt/equity                             |  |                  | 0.43      |  |      |  | 0.72      |
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of AES Gener S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to the best
  of such officers knowledge:

| | 1. | The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                  

June 8, 2007

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Felipe Cerón       
| | Felipe Cerón           
| | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the AES Gener S.A. and will be retained by AES Gener S.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of LCC International, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) |  | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2004, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, our financial condition and results of operations.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Graham B. Perkins

Graham B. Perkins
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
May , 2004
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton

ZENITH HILLIARD MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0585-98-3 PER CURIAM AUGUST 25, 1998 TRI TRAVEL NETWORK, INC. AND NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Terry L. Armentrout; Armentrout & Armentrout, on brief), for appellant. (John K. Coleman; Slenker, Brandt, Jennings & Johnston, on brief), for appellees.

Zenith Hilliard ("claimant") contends that the Workers' Compensation Commission ("commission") erred in finding that Tri Travel Network, Inc. ("employer") proved that claimant was released to return to her pre-injury employment as of May 15, 1996. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. See Rule 5A:27. On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below. See R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v.

Mullins , 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). Factual findings made by the commission must be upheld on appeal if supported by credible evidence. See James v. Capitol Steel

Constr. Co. , 8 Va. App. 512, 515, 382 S.E.2d 487, 488 (1989). In granting employer's application, the commission found as

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.-2- follows: As to the weight restriction, we AFFIRM the Deputy Commissioner's decision. Ms. White weighed a box filled with files and determined that it weighed only 21 1/2 pounds. The claimant's testimony that the filled box weighed more than 50 pounds was based on her guess. The Deputy Commissioner properly gave greater weight to Ms. White's testimony.

* * * * * * * Neither the claimant's regular duties, nor the job description approved by Dr. [Ritchie] Gillespie require the claimant to do her work from a standing position. Dr. Gillespie's view of the claimant's ability to sit, changed from February to May. While the claimant could not sit for more than one hour at a time in February, by May it was Dr. Gillespie's opinion, as shown by his approval of the job description, that the claimant could perform a job that required her to sit or stand "as needed." A fair reading of the job description together with Dr. Gillespie's office notes show that he believed the claimant could perform her sedentary job so long as she could stand whenever necessary. The claimant testified that she usually performed her job sitting but she was able to stand as necessary.

Dr. Gillespie's medical records, his approval of the job description which he discussed with claimant, and claimant's testimony that she could stand as necessary in her pre-injury work, constitute credible evidence to support the commission's finding that claimant was fully able to return to her pre-injury employment. For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision.

Affirmed

.
Exhibit 32.1

                             Transbotics Corporation

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  the  undersigned  officers  of  the  Transbotics
Corporation (the "Company") certify that the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the
Company for the fiscal period ending  November 30, 2005 fully  complies with the
requirements  of  section  13(a) or  15(d),  as  applicable,  of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and  information  contained  in that Form 10-KSB  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.


Dated: February 24, 2006

                                      /s/ Claude Imbleau
                                      ---------------------------------
                                              Claude Imbleau
                                              President and CEO
                                              (principal executive officer and
                                               principal accounting officer)

**   This  certification  is made solely for the  purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section
     1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein,  and not for any
     other purpose.


                                       35
<Page>

EXHIBIT 32.1

           Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certification
                                  (filing copy)

To Whom It May Concern,

      In connection with the Annual Report of Ingen Technologies Inc. ("Ingen")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), we, Scott
R. Sand, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Ingen, and Thomas J. Neavitt,
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Ingen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Ingen.

      /s/ Scott R. Sand
      ------------------------------------
      Scott R. Sand
      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

      /s/ Thomas J. Neavitt
      -------------------------------------
      Thomas J. Neavitt
      Secretary and Chief Financial Officer


August 29, 2007
Exhibit
23.1








Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders


of The
Savannah Bancorp, Inc.





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (No. 333-163210), Form S-3 (No. 333-146547) and Form S-8 (No.
333-69175) of The Savannah Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2010,
relating to the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and
for the three years then ended, which appear in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.








/s/Mauldin &
Jenkins, LLC





Albany,
Georgia


March 15,
2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation of public hearing.

# SUMMARY:

The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure has been canceled: Criminal Rules Hearing on October 24, 2017, in Chicago, Illinois.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Rules Committee Secretary, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Announcement for this hearing was previously published in 82 FR 37610.

Dated: September 27, 2017.

Rebecca A. Womeldorf,

Rules Committee Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-21030 Filed 10-2-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
---

Exhibit 8


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Minefinders Corporation Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg D. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  February 24, 2011
     /s/ Greg D. SmithGreg D. SmithChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Minefinders Corporation Ltd. and will be retained by Minefinders Corporation Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the TEAM America, Inc. (the "Company") Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 28, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Andrew H. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1). The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2). The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:     April 28,  2003                  By: /s/ Andrew H. Johnson
     ------------------------                 ----------------------------------
                                               Andrew H. Johnson
                                               Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANNY L. BLACKMON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (7:03-cr-00077-BO-1; 

7:18-cv-00127-BO)

Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 20, 2018

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny L. Blackmon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Danny L. Blackmon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Blackmon has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. 

Additionally, we construe Blackmon’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an 

application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock, 340 

F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 

motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either:

(1) newly discovered evidence that . . . would be sufficient to establish by 

clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have 

found the movant guilty of the offense; or
3

(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral 

review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.

28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Blackmon’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. 

Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)
(Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Universal Guardian Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marian J. Barcikowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge

(1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: April 13, 2005 | By: | /s/ Marian J. Barcikowski                                              
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |     | Marian J. Barcikowski
Chief Financial Officer
(chief financial officer)



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Vera GIOVANETTI, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry G. Giovanetti, deceased, Plaintiff, v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, John P. Gallagher, Frank A. Finnerty, Defendants.

No. 4953-53.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

Oct. 22, 1958.

*494I. William Stempil, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Paul R. Connolly, H. Mason Welch, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.

Upon remand of this case on October 6, 1958, the Court carefully reconsidered and studied the transcript of October 7, 1957.

Counsel for plaintiff made no objection to having this case set for trial on October 7, 1957, and appeared in court apparently ready for trial on that date. When the case was called for trial, plaintiff’s counsel made a statement to the Court that he could not prove a cause of action if he were to be restricted to those issues remaining after the pre-trial order of Judge Kirkland on October 11, 1956 and the partial summary adjudication of Judge McGuire on February 27, 1957. Accordingly, counsel for plaintiff moved for a dismissal without prejudice. Counsel for defendants objected to a dismissal without prejudice and requested a dismissal with prejudice for want of prosecution.

In view of the time the case had been pending, and in view of the numerous matters that had been litigated in this case prior to October 7, 1957 and the important rights acquired by the defendants as a result of the progress of this pre-trial litigation, and in view of the statement made by counsel for plaintiff that he could not prove a case on the issues so limited, it is the opinion of this Court that the case should be dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution. Walker v. Spencer, 10 Cir., 1941, 123 F. 2d 347; Lynch v. National Bondholders Corporation, D.C.1942, 2 F.R.D. 376; Rollison v. Washington National Insurance Co., 4 Cir., 1949, 176 F.2d 364; Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. following § 2072.

An order to that effect has this day been rendered.