alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      11,694,940
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      10,246,287
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 38,025,338
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    786,411,364
<ALLOWANCE>                                  5,004,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             880,346,715
<DEPOSITS>                                 586,707,413
<SHORT-TERM>                                26,437,292
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         10,754,564
<LONG-TERM>                                187,170,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    63,852,679
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,424,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             880,346,715
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             58,166,166
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,422,146
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,973,311
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            62,561,623
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          24,767,702
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          36,601,042
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       25,960,581
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  390,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,362
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             16,223,694
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             17,656,032
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  11,844,032
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,844,032
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.10
<LOANS-NON>                                    611,080
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 18,443
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             4,730,407
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  167,493
<RECOVERIES>                                    51,234
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            5,004,148
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,389,949
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      2,614,199
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund II, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the year ended March 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Thomas J. Riha, Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Partnership.




/s/ THOMAS J. RIHA
------------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Date:  August 12, 2009
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JASON P. REED, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3178 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) 

### ) Opinion filed May 18, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Michael F. Andrews, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, CRENSHAW, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 11.1**

 

**Cornell Corrections, Inc.**

**Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings**

**(in thousands except per share amounts)**

 
|                                                                                           |   | **Three  Months Ended March 31,** |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                           |   | **2004**                          |   | **2003** |   |
|                                                                                           |   | **Basic**                         |   | **Diluted** |   | **Basic** |   | **Diluted** |   |
|                                                                                           |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net Earnings                                                                                   |   | $                                 | 706    |   | $ | 706 |   | $ | 1,957 |   | $ | 1,957 |   |
|                                                                                           |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Shares used in computing net earnings per  share:                                              |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average common shares and common  share equivalents                                   |   | 14,626                            |   | 14,626 |   | 14,240 |   | 14,240 |   |
|                                                                                           |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Less treasury shares                                                                           |   | (1,545                            | )      | (1,545 | ) | (1,456 | ) | (1,456 | ) |
|                                                                                           |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Effect of shares issuable under stock  options and warrants based on the treasury stock method |   | —                            |   | 231 |   | — |   | 156 |   |
|                                                                                           |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                                           |   | 13,081                            |   | 13,312 |   | 12,784 |   | 12,940 |   |
|                                                                                           |   |                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net earnings per share                                                                         |   | $                                 | 0.05   |   | $ | 0.05 |   | $ | 0.15 |   | $ | 0.15 |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31, 1999 10-Q BALANCE SHEET & INCOME STATEMENT AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,338,235
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,941,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,898,794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,738,194
<PP&E>                                      20,047,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,028,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      140,376,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,926
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,908,781
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,028,184
<SALES>                                     22,774,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,774,643
<CGS>                                       10,094,981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,094,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,659,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             7,267,589
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,222,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,469,964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8,162)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,461,802)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,461,802)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.14)
        







</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00225-CV

DIANA IZAGUIRRE

v.

JOE LOUIS AGUILAR

On Appeal from the

332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-0533-19-F

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal 

are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 25, 2021
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alvon Allen THOMAS, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-7579.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 19, 2008.

Decided: June 23, 2008.

Alvon Allen Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alvon Allen Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thomas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.9



SECOND AMENDMENT TO FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY
2016 KEY EMPLOYEE RETENTION PLAN


This Amendment to the FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company 2016 Key Employee Retention Plan is adopted and effective as of December 1, 2017.
WHEREAS, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (the “Company”) adopted the 2016 Key Employee Retention Plan (the “Plan”), effective as of December 1, 2016, which provides eligible participants with a “KERP Payment” if they remain employed with the Company until November 30, 2018 subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the Plan; and
WHEREAS, Company amended the Plan effective March 31, 2017; and
WHEREAS, Company wishes to again amend the Plan effective December 1, 2017 so that the KERP Payment for any KERP agreement (“KERP”) issued on or after December 1, 2017 shall be determined by multiplying the percentage set forth on Schedule A by the Participant’s salary as of when the KERP is issued, and will be prorated;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
		
	1.
	Section 4 (e) of the Plan is amended by deleting its current language and replacing it with the following:




		
	e.
	“KERP Payment” shall mean, in the case of any Participant, the amount set forth on Schedule A. Said amount will be determined by multiplying the percentage set forth on Schedule A by the Participant’s salary as of December 1, 2016. The amount for any KERP issued on or after December 1, 2017 for a newly Eligible Participant shall be determined by multiplying the percentage set forth on Schedule A by the Participant’s salary at the time the KERP is issued, but will be prorated by a percentage where the numerator is the number of months in which the Eligible Participant worked the majority of the month, from the date that the KERP was issued, through and including November, 2018, and the denominator is twenty-four (24). The amount for any KERP issued on or after December 1, 2017 for someone who is already an Eligible Participant, but is issued a new KERP due to a change in position such that the Company determines the amount should be modified, shall equal a prorated amount of their prior KERP and a prorated amount of the newly issued KERP, which will be calculated by multiplying the amount of their salary for their new position, by the percentage set forth on Schedule A.      




		
	2.
	Schedule A of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the Plan’s current Schedule A and replacing it with the Schedule A attached hereto. Any additional Eligible Participants or increase in KERP amounts to an Eligible Participant shall be paid from the discretionary fund established in Section 8 (d) of the Plan.

















	
	
	FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY

	 

	 

	/s/ Samuel L. Belcher

	BY:  Samuel L. Belcher

	TITLE: President and Chief Nuclear Officer

	 

	 

	 

	FIRSTENERGY SERVICE COMPANY

	 

	 

	/s/ Charles E. Jones

	BY:       Charles E. Jones

	TITLE: President and Chief Executive Officer, FirstEnergy Corp.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

*Notice is hereby given*                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for Horizon Bank, Bradenton, Florida (“the Receiver”) intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of Horizon Bank on September 10, 2010. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.                

Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.

No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Dated: September 28, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-21172 Filed 10-2-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: THERESA CABALLERO,

 Relator.

'

'

'

'

No. 08-15-00097-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus 

against the Honorable Sam Medrano, Judge of the 409th District Court of El Paso, Texas, and 

conditionally grants relief, in accordance with the opinion of this court. The writ will issue only 

if the trial court fails to comply with this opinion.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
1

The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3117

___________

Angela R. Young; Charles D. Young, *

*

Appellants, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Department of Housing *

and Urban Development; Ocwen *

Federal Bank; Greg Whitworth, * [UNPUBLISHED]

professionally and individually; Wilson *

& Associates, P.L.L.C.; Robbie Wilson, *

professionally and individually; John *

Does, unidentified others, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: June 10, 2003

 Filed: October 20, 2003

___________

Before BOWMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Charles and Angela Young appeal the district court’s1

 adverse disposition of their

pro se housing-related claims. After careful review, we affirm the district court’s grant
-2-

of summary judgment to the United States Department of Housing & Urban Development,

Wilson Associates, LLC (the Wilson Firm), and Robert M. Wilson, Jr.; and the court’s

dismissal of Ocwen Savings Bank. Although the district court did not enter any

judgment as to defendant Greg Whitworth, we conclude that the district court

intended to dismiss him from the case. See Small Engine Shop, Inc. v. Cascio, 878 F.2d

883, 886-87 (5th Cir. 1989). We deny as moot Whitworth’s motion to be added to

Ocwen’s pleadings. We also deny the Youngs’ request to transfer this appeal to the

Federal Circuit. The motion of Wilson and the Wilson firm to be dismissed is

granted.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Jonah Shacknai, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MedicisPharmaceutical Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report.   Date: October 28, 2005     JONAH SHACKNAI     /s/ JONAH SHACKNAI     (Jonah Shacknai)  Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000870229     
<NAME>                             GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PTSP III-D
                                    
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                   172,776
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            268,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         441,479
<PP&E>                                12,485,454
<DEPRECIATION>                        11,248,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,687,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     60,450
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,444,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,687,823
<SALES>                                1,789,571
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1,858,355
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          1,904,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (46,036)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (46,036)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (46,036)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
 

</TABLE>
Order filed July 18, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

___________

NO. 01-17-00488-CV

____________

ROBERT GULLEDGE AND DIANA GULLEDGE, Appellant

V.

WARREN WESTER AND THEODORE SULLIVAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 10th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16-CV-1022

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of the following document:

• Plaintiff’s Exhibit 47.
The exhibit clerk of the 10th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk 

of this court the original of the identified document, on or before July 25, 2018. The 

Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe these original 

exhibits; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon 

completion of inspection, to return the original of the identified documents, to the 

clerk of the 10th District Court.

PER CURIAM