alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-36-2017]

On May 10, 2017, Hans-Mill Corporation submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 64D, in Jacksonville, Florida.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (82 FR 25596, June 2, 2017). On September 7, 2017, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: September 22, 2017.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-20818 Filed 9-27-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                       OF
                        PAINEWEBBER/GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME
                            LIMITED PARTNERSHIP III-G


       The undersigned  General Partner hereby duly executes this Certificate of
Limited  Partnership of  PaineWebber/Geodyne  Energy Income Limited  Partnership
III-G (the  "Partnership"),  which is being filed with the Secretary of State of
Oklahoma in accordance with the Oklahoma  Revised  Uniform  Limited  Partnership
Act.

       1.    The name of the Partnership is PaineWebber/Geodyne  Energy Income
Limited Partnership III-G.

       2. The address of the registered  office of the  Partnership is 320 South
Boston,  The Mezzanine,  Tulsa,  Oklahoma 74103,  and the name of the registered
agent whose business  office  address will be the same as the registered  office
address is Geodyne Production Company.

       3. The address of the principal  office of the  Partnership in the United
States  where its  partnership  records are to be kept or made  available is c/o
Geodyne  Production  Company,  320 South Boston Avenue,  the  Mezzanine,  Tulsa,
Oklahoma 74103-3708.

       4. The name,  the mailing  address and the street address of the business
or residence of each general partner of the Partnership are as follows:

Name                      Mailing Address            Business Address
----                      ---------------            ----------------
Geodyne Production        320 S. Boston Ave.         320 S. Boston Ave.
Company                   The Mezzanine              The Mezzanine
                          Tulsa, OK 74103-3708       Tulsa, 0K 74103-3708

       5.    The latest  date upon which the  Partnership  is to  dissolve  is
September 20, 2011.

       SIGNED on this 20th day of September, 1991.


                                         GENERAL PARTNER:

                                         Geodyne Production Company
                                         a Delaware corporation

                                         By: /s/ Michael E. Luttrell
                                             -----------------------
                                             Michael E. Luttrell
                                             Executive Vice President
[956 NYS2d 788]

#### Beautiful Village Associates Redevelopment Company, Appellant, v Almira Gomez et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 20, 2012

*15APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Rose & Rose,*New York City *(Phillip Wartell*of counsel), for appellant. *Almira Gomez,*respondent pro se. *Shelima Mosquea,*respondent pro se.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Final judgment entered March 14, 2012, reversed, without costs, and final judgment awarded to landlord upon its cause of action for possession. Execution of the warrant of eviction shall be stayed for 30 days from the service of a copy of this order with notice of entry.

Evidence at trial established that police, in the course of a lawful search of tenants’ apartment, recovered, among other items, multiple ziplock bags containing marijuana, a strainer and scale, each containing cocaine residue, and a substantial amount of cash. These items were found in a locked closet, for which tenant Gomez and her son had the only keys. Based upon this evidence, we find that landlord met its burden of establishing that tenant’s apartment was being used for “drug-related criminal activity” in violation of tenant’s Section 8 lease agreement. Moreover, in light of the location, amount and nature of the contraband, an inference was raised that tenants knew or should have known of this drug-related activity *(see Matter of 88-09 Realty v Hill,*305 AD2d 409, 410 [2003]; *New York City Hous. Auth. v Otero,*5 Misc 3d 134[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51454[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2004]), an inference that tenants failed to rebut. Indeed, tenants failed to offer any plausible explanation for the presence of the contraband. Given the persuasive showing of tenants’ knowing violation of the lease, and in the absence of any express credibility findings below, we exercise our authority to render the judgment warranted by the facts (see *Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford,*60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]).

In view of the foregoing, we need not address whether the strict liability standard enunciated in *Department of Housing & Urban Development v Rucker*(535 US 125 [2002]), is properly *16applied to a drug holdover proceeding brought against a Section 8 tenant.

Shulman, J.E, Hunter, Jr. and Torres, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          41,313
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,882
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               252,572
<PP&E>                                         173,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                  87,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 470,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,839
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     284,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   470,902
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               124,463
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (67,171)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,041
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (68,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (68,185)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.35)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the September 30, 2003 Form 10-Q ofCornell Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John L. Hendrix,certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ John L. Hendrix                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | John L. Hendrix, Executive Vice       |
|   | President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | November 14, 2003                     |

 

----
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2611 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize 

the Securing the Cities Initiative of the Department of 

Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2611 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SECURING THE CITIES INI2 TIATIVE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title XIX of the Homeland Secu4 rity Act of 2002 is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 1908. AUTHORIZATION OF SECURING THE CITIES INI7 TIATIVE. 

8 ‘‘(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

9 ‘‘(1) The Securing the Cities Initiative of the 

10 Department uses next generation radiation detection 

11 technology to detect the transport of nuclear and ra12 diological material in urban areas by terrorists or 

13 other unauthorized individuals. 

14 ‘‘(2) The technology used by partners in the Se15 curing the Cities Initiative leverages radiation detec16 tion technology used at ports of entry. 

17 ‘‘(3) The Securing the Cities Initiative has fos18 tered unprecedented collaboration and coordination 

19 among its Federal, State, and local partners. 

20 ‘‘(4) The Securing the Cities Initiative is a crit21 ical national capability to detect the dangerous intro22 duction of nuclear and radiological material. 

23 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

24 is authorized to be appropriated to the Director of the Do25 mestic Nuclear Detection Office of the Department for the 
3 

•HR 2611 EH

1 Securing the Cities Initiative such sums as may be nec2 essary for each fiscal year, including— 

3 ‘‘(1) for each city in which it has been imple4 mented by fiscal year 2009— 

5 ‘‘(A) $40,000,000 for fiscal year 2010; 

6 ‘‘(B) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2011; and 

7 ‘‘(C) not less than $10,000,000 in 

8 sustainment assistance for each fiscal year 

9 thereafter; and 

10 ‘‘(2) for additional Securing the Cities initia11 tives to be implemented in not fewer than 2 sites 

12 participating in the Urban Area Security Initiative, 

13 such sums as may be necessary each fiscal year to 

14 implement and sustain each additional initiative.’’. 

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con16 tents in section 1(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 

17 2002 is amended by inserting after the item relating to 

18 section 1907 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 1908. Authorization of Securing the Cities Initiative.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 20, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2611 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to 

purposes. Department of Homeland Security, and for other authorize the Securing the Cities Initiative of the
#### Goldman & Greenbaum, P.C., Respondent, v Parisis G. Filippatos, Appellant.

[861 NYS2d 312]

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered April 25, 2007, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, referring the matter of damages and costs to a Special Referee to hear and report, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The Fee Dispute Resolution Program has no applicability where the amount in dispute exceeds $50,000 *(see*22 NYCRR 137.1 [b] [2]); both parties agree that the amount in dispute substantially exceeds that amount. Plaintiff contends that since it rescinded the tentative credit of $50,000, the amount owed by defendant client is approximately $140,000. Defendant admits he paid only $114,000 of the approximately $250,000 billed in attorney’s fees. The amount in dispute clearly exceeds the $50,000 cap.

Plaintiff law firm did not consent to arbitration (22 NYCRR 137.2). Accordingly, it is unnecessary to consider whether defen*398dant waived his right to arbitration. Concur—Lippman, PJ., Tom, Gonzalez, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Optimal Group Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge:





1)
the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated     May 19, 2010





By:
/s/ Neil S. WechslerNeil S. WechslerCo-Chairman andChief Executive Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mario Alonso UMANZOR-PLEITES, also known as Mario Alonso Umanzor-Pleytes, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-50595

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 19, 2008.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western *341District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mario Alonso Umanzor-Pleites, Youngstown, OH, pro se.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Mario Alonso Umanzor-Pleites has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Umanzor-Pleites has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Majestic Star Casino,
LLC and The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp. (collectively, the "Registrant")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Don H.
Barden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Jon S.
Bennett, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act OF 2002, that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant.

Dated: May 13, 2005

/s/ Don H. Barden
-----------------------
Don H. Barden
Manager, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
The Majestic Star Casino, LLC and
The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.

/s/ Jon S. Bennett
-----------------------
Jon S. Bennett
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
The Majestic Star Casino, LLC and
The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2924 

To expedite the deployment of highway construction projects, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 

Mr. FORBES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To expedite the deployment of highway construction projects, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘414 Plan Act of 2011’’. 

5 SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR 

6 HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided by subsection 

8 (b), the requirements of Federal laws and regulations, in9 cluding the prevailing rate of wage requirements specified 

10 in section 113 of title 23, United States Code, shall not 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2924 IH

1 apply to any Federal-aid highway or highway safety con2 struction project. 

3 (b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

4 Federal laws and regulations relating to, as determined 

5 by the Secretary of Transportation— 

6 (1) the safety or durability of a highway facil7 ity; or 

8 (2) public or workplace safety. 

9 (c) SUNSET.—This section shall cease to be effective 

10 after the last day of the 5-year period beginning on the 

11 date of enactment of this Act. 

12 SEC. 3. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS REGARDING BICYCLE 

13 TRANSPORTATION AND PEDESTRIAN WALK14 WAYS. 

15 (a) REPEAL OF PROTECTION OF NONMOTORIZED

16 TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC REQUIREMENT.—Section 

17 109(m) of title 23, United States Code, is repealed. 

18 (b) REPEAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT

19 ALLOCATION.—Section 133(d)(2) of title 23, United 

20 States Code, is repealed. 

21 (c) REPEAL OF BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION AND PE22 DESTRIAN WALKWAYS AUTHORIZATIONS AND REQUIRE23 MENTS.—Section 217 of title 23, United States Code, and 

24 the item relating to such section in the analysis for chap25 ter 2 of that title, are repealed. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2924 IH

1 (d) PLANNING REQUIREMENTS.— 

2 (1) GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.—Sections 

3 134(c)(2) and 135(a)(2) of title 23, United States 

4 Code, and sections 5303(c)(2) and 5304(a)(2) of 

5 title 49, United States Code, are amended by strik6 ing ‘‘(including accessible pedestrian walkways and 

7 bicycle transportation facilities)’’. 

8 (2) PARTICIPATION BY INTERESTED PAR9 TIES.—Sections 134(i)(5)(A) and 135(f)(3)(A) of 

10 title 23, United States Code, and sections 

11 5303(i)(5)(A) and 5304(f)(3)(A) of title 49, United 

12 States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘representa13 tives of users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle 

14 transportation facilities,’’. 

15 SEC. 4. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON NEED FOR COOPERATION 

16 TO EXPEDITE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION 

17 PROJECTS. 

18 It is the sense of Congress that States, Federal agen19 cies, localities, and private stakeholders should take steps 

20 toward increased cooperation to further expedite surface 

21 transportation projects. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan and the 2001 Stock Option Plan of UnionFinancial Bancshares, Inc. and in the Post Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-35319) pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment Plan of Union Financial Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2005,with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Union Financial Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Elliott Davis, LLC 

 

March 21, 2005 

Greenville, South Carolina
##### 



EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|1. |  | First Federal of the South (federally chartered stock savings
association), organized under the laws of the United States of America           
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | Magnolia Title Services, Inc. (title insurance and related services) (50%
ownership interest), organized under the laws of the State of Alabama
|  
|3. |  | SouthFirst Financial Services, Inc. (insurance products and financial
services), organized under the laws of the State of Alabama              
|  
|4. |  | SouthFirst Mortgage, Inc. (residential construction lending), organized
under the laws of the State of Alabama