Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 4, 2017 / Notices 46345 

from Surplus Property restrictions. The 

property consists of 45 buildable acres 

and 76.5 acres of protected wetland/ 

buffer as well as road and drainage 

improvements. Environmental analysis 

has been completed. Lots range from 1.7 

acres to 8.8 acres in size. The property 

is located within the Bayview Ridge 

Subarea Plan. The release will allow the 

expansion of industrial facilities 

adjacent to the existing Paccar 

operation. 

DATES: Comments are due within 30 

days of the date of the publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register. 

Written comments can be provided to 

Ms. Cayla D. Morgan, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Seattle Airports 

District Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Suite 250, Renton, WA 98057–3356. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Heather Rogerson, Planning and 

Environmental Administrator, Port of 

Skagit, 15400 Airport Drive, Burlington, 

WA 98223; or Ms. Cayla D. Morgan, 

Environmental Protection Specialist, 

Seattle Airports District Office, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Suite 250, Renton, 

WA, 98057–3356, (425) 227–2653. 

Documents reflecting this FAA action 

may be reviewed at the above locations. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the 

provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. 47151(d), 

and 47153(c), the FAA is considering a 

proposal from the Port of Skagit to 

release approximately 125 acres of 

airport land. The Port has invested 

significant funds for commercial 

subdivisions and installation of critical 

infrastructure in Divisions 5 and 7, but 

despite the ready-to-build condition and 

years of steady marketing the Port has 

not been able to attract a suitable 

private-sector development on a leased 

basis. 

Paccar, Inc., a private sector 

corporation, has now presented the Port 

with an offer to purchase. The Port 

commission has declared a portion of 

Division 5 and all of Division 7 (‘‘the 

property’’) surplus to the needs of Port 

of Skagit and desires to sell the property 

to Paccar in order to generate new 

income to be used for the benefit of the 

Airport. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 27, 2017. 

Jason Ritchie, 

Assistant Manager, Seattle Airports District 

Office. 

[FR Doc. 2017–21361 Filed 10–3–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions 

on Proposed Transportation Projects 

in Florida 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), USDOT. 

ACTION: Notice of limitation of claims for 

judicial review of actions by FHWA and 

other Federal Agencies. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces actions 

taken by FHWA and other Federal 

Agencies since July 25, 2016, that are 

final. The actions relate to the proposed 

SR–87 Connector (from SR 87S to SR 

87N) in Santa Rosa County; and the I– 

4 Beyond the Ultimate (BtU) from south 

of SR 528 to east of SR 472 in Orange, 

Seminole and Volusia Counties, in the 

State of Florida. These actions grant 

licenses, permits, and approvals for the 

projects. 

DATES: A claim seeking judicial review 

of the Federal agency actions on the 

listed highway projects will be barred 

unless the claim is filed on or before 

March 5, 2018. If the Federal law that 

authorizes judicial review of a claim 

provides a time period of less than 150 

days for filing such claim, then that 

shorter time period still applies. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

FHWA: Ms. Cathy Kendall, AICP, 

Senior Environmental Specialist, FHWA 

Florida Division, 3500 Financial Plaza, 

Suite 400, Tallahassee, Florida 32312; 

telephone: (850) 553–2225; email: 

cathy.kendall@dot.gov. The FHWA 

Florida Division Office’s normal 

business hours are 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 

(Eastern Standard Time), Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that FHWA and other 

Federal Agencies have taken final 

agency action by issuing licenses, 

permits, and approvals for the projects 

in Florida listed below. The actions by 

the Federal agencies on a project, and 

the laws under which such actions were 

taken, are described in the documented 

environmental evaluation and 

assessment study or environmental 

impact statement (EIS) issued in 

connection with the project, and in 

other project records for the listed 

projects. The Final Evaluation and 

Assessment Study, or FEIS, Record of 

Decision (ROD), and other documents 

from FHWA and other Federal Agency 

project records for the listed projects are 

available by contacting the FHWA at the 

address above, or by using the links 

provided below. 

This notice applies to all Federal 

agency decisions by issuing licenses, 

permits, and approvals as of the 

issuance date of this notice and all laws 

under which such actions were taken, 

including but not limited to: 

1. General: National Environmental 

Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321– 

4351; Federal-Aid Highway Act (FAHA) 

[23 U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128]. 

2. Air: Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 

7401–7671(q). 

3. Land: Section 4(f) of the 

Department of Transportation Act of 

1966 (4f) [49 U.S.C. 303 and 23 U.S.C. 

138]. 

4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act 

(ESA) [16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and 1536]; 

Marine Mammal Protection Act [16 

U.S.C. 1361], Fish and Wildlife 

Coordination Act [16 U.S.C. 661–667(d); 

Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) [16 

U.S.C. 703–712]; Magnuson-Stevenson 

Fishery Conservation and Management 

Act of 1976, as amended [16 U.S.C. 1801 

et seq.]. 

5. Historic and Cultural Resources: 

Section 106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act of 1966, as amended 

(106) [16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.]; 

Archaeological Resources Protection Act 

of 1977 (ARPA) [16 U.S.C. 470(aa)– 

470(II)]; Archaeological and Historic 

Preservation Act (AHPA) [16 U.S.C. 

469–469(c)]; Native American Grave 

Protection and Repatriation Act 

(NAGPRA) [25 U.S.C. 3001–3013]. 

6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights 

Act of 1964 (Civil Rights) [42 U.S.C. 

20000(d)–2000(d)(1)]; American Indian 

Religious Freedom Act [42 U.S.C. 1996]; 

Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA) 

[7 U.S.C. 4201–4209]. 

7. Wetlands and Water Resources: 

Clean Water Act (Section 404, Section 

401, Section 319) [33 U.S.C. 1251– 

1377]; Coastal Barriers Resources Act 

(CBRA) [16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.]; Coastal 

Zone Management Act (CZMA) [16 

U.S.C. 1451–1466]; Land and Water 

Conservation Fund (LWCF) [16 U.S.C. 

4601–4604]; Safe Drinking Water Act 

(SDWA) [42 U.S.C. 300(f)–300(j)(6)]; 

Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 [33 

U.S.C. 401–406]; Wild and Scenic 

Rivers Act [16 U.S.C. 1271–1287]; 

Emergency Wetlands Resources Act [16 

U.S.C. 3921, 3931]; Wetlands 

Mitigation, [23 U.S.C. 103(b)(6)(M) and 

103(b)(11)]; Flood Disaster Protection 

Act [42 U.S.C. 4001–4128]. 

8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 

Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988 

Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898, 

Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low Income 

Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and 

Enhancement of Cultural Resources; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
46346 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 4, 2017 / Notices 

E.O. 13287 Preserve America; E.O. 

13175 Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments; E.O. 

11514 Protection and Enhancement of 

Environmental Quality; E.O. 13112 

Invasive Species. 

The projects subject to this notice are: 

1. Project Location: Santa Rosa 

County, SR 87 Connector from SR 87 

South to SR 87 North, Federal Project 

No: SF1 296 R, S129 348 R, TCSP 033 

U, T129 348 R. Project type: The project 

involves a new roadway facility that 

will directly link SR 87S with SR 87N 

in the vicinity of Milton. Final agency 

actions are taken under: NEPA, FAHA, 

CAA, 4(f), E.O. 12898, etc., and are 

described in the FEIS and ROD issued 

on October 20, 2016, and are available 

at http://www.sr87connector.com/ 

status.html. 

2. Project Location: Orange, Seminole, 

and Volusia Counties, Interstate 4 (I–4) 

from south of SR 528 to east of SR 472, 

Federal Project No: 0041 227 I. The 

project involves the build-out of I–4 in 

Central Florida to result in three General 

Use lanes in each direction with the 

addition of two new Express Lanes in 

each direction, resulting in a total of ten 

dedicated lanes. Final agency actions 

are taken under: NEPA, etc., and are 

described in the Final Evaluation and 

Assessment Study and ROD issued on 

August 24, 2017, and are available at 

www.i4express.com. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning 

and Construction. The regulations 

implementing Executive Order 12372 

regarding intergovernmental consultation on 

Federal programs and activities apply to this 

program.) 

Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). 

Issued on: September 27, 2017. 

David Hawk, 

Acting Division Administrator, Federal 

Highway Administration, Tallahassee, 

Florida. 

[FR Doc. 2017–21372 Filed 10–3–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

[Docket No. NHTSA–2017–0021; Notice 1] 

Gillig, LLC, Receipt of Petition for 

Decision of Inconsequential 

Noncompliance 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA), 

Department of Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Receipt of petition. 

SUMMARY: Gillig, LLC (Gillig), has 

determined that certain model year 

(MY) 1997–2016 Gillig low floor buses 

do not fully comply with Federal Motor 

Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 

108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and 

Associated Equipment. Gillig filed a 

noncompliance report dated February 

24, 2017. Gillig also petitioned NHTSA 

on March 24, 2017, and amended it on 

May 10, 2017, for a decision that the 

subject noncompliance is 

inconsequential as it relates to motor 

vehicle safety. 

DATES: The closing date for comments 

on the petition is November 3, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written data, views, 

and arguments on this petition. 

Comments must refer to the docket and 

notice number cited in the title of this 

notice and submitted by any of the 

following methods: 

• Mail: Send comments by mail 

addressed to U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver comments 

by hand to U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. The Docket 

Section is open on weekdays from 10 

a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays. 

• Electronically: Submit comments 

electronically by logging onto the 

Federal Docket Management System 

(FDMS) Web site at https://

www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Comments may also be faxed to 

(202) 493–2251. 

Comments must be written in the 

English language, and be no greater than 

15 pages in length, although there is no 

limit to the length of necessary 

attachments to the comments. If 

comments are submitted in hard copy 

form, please ensure that two copies are 

provided. If you wish to receive 

confirmation that comments you have 

submitted by mail were received, please 

enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard with the comments. Note that 

all comments received will be posted 

without change to https://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided. 

All comments and supporting 

materials received before the close of 

business on the closing date indicated 

above will be filed in the docket and 

will be considered. All comments and 

supporting materials received after the 

closing date will also be filed and will 

be considered to the fullest extent 

possible. 

When the petition is granted or 

denied, notice of the decision will also 

be published in the Federal Register 

pursuant to the authority indicated at 

the end of this notice. 

All comments, background 

documentation, and supporting 

materials submitted to the docket may 

be viewed by anyone at the address and 

times given above. The documents may 

also be viewed on the Internet at https:// 

www.regulations.gov by following the 

online instructions for accessing the 

dockets. The docket ID number for this 

petition is shown in the heading of this 

notice. 

DOT’s complete Privacy Act 

Statement is available for review in a 

Federal Register notice published on 

April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477–78). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Overview: Gillig, LLC (Gillig), has 

determined that certain model year 

(MY) 1997–2016 Gillig low floor buses 

do not fully comply with paragraph 

S7.1.1.13.1 of FMVSS No. 108, Lamps, 

Reflective Devices, and Associated 

Equipment. Gillig filed a 

noncompliance report dated February 

24, 2017, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, 

Defect and Noncompliance 

Responsibility and Reports. Gillig also 

petitioned NHTSA on March 24, 2017, 

and amended it on May 10, 2017, 

pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 

30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, for an 

exemption from the notification and 

remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. 

Chapter 301 on the basis that this 

noncompliance is inconsequential as it 

relates to motor vehicle safety. 

This notice of receipt of Gillig’s 

petition is published under 49 U.S.C. 

30118 and 30120 and does not represent 

any agency decision or other exercise of 

judgment concerning the merits of the 

petition. 

II. Buses Involved: Approximately 

41,714 MY 1997–2016 Gillig low floor 

buses, manufactured between December 

31, 1997, and February 3, 2017, are 

potentially involved. 

III. Noncompliance: Gillig stated that 

it installed six different generations of 

turn signal assemblies in the subject 

buses; however, after receiving two 

complaints that their Generation 7 turn 

signal assemblies were not sufficiently 

visible, Gillig and the turn signal 

manufacturer went back and tested the 

previous generations to see if they met 

the requirements of FMVSS No. 108. 

Test results for generations 1 through 6 

of the turn signal assemblies showed 

that they do not meet all the minimum 

photometry requirements of paragraph 

S7.1.1.13.1 of FMVSS No. 108. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES