alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Robert W. Boykin, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, certifythat:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boykin LodgingCompany; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 5, 2004 By:/s/ Robert W. Boykin    Robert W. Boykin Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          41,012
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                       444
<INVENTORY>                                     56,850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,051
<PP&E>                                          31,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 285,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,004
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,554
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   285,671
<SALES>                                        152,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               152,024
<CGS>                                           76,178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,678
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,669
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,351
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,865
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,453
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit






















AMENDMENT TO 
THE CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION 2013 STOCK PLAN
This amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Cypress Semiconductor Corporation 2013 Stock Plan (the “Plan”), is made and entered into effective as of February 16, 2018.  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (the “Company”) desires, pursuant to its authority under Section 18 of the Plan, to amend the Plan to broaden the Administrator’s delegation authority under the Plan;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows:
1.    Amendment to Section 4.  Section 4 is amended to include an additional subsection 4.4 thereunder, which shall read as follows:
“4.4     To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Board or Committee may from time to time delegate to a committee of one or more members of the Board or one or more executive officers of the Company the authority to grant or amend Awards; provided, however, that in no event shall an executive officer be delegated the authority to grant awards to, or amend awards held by, the following individuals: (a) individuals who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, (b) executive officers of the Company (or Directors) to whom authority to grant or amend Awards has been delegated hereunder. Any delegation hereunder shall be subject to the restrictions and limits that the Board or Committee specifies at the time of such delegation, and the Board may at any time rescind the authority so delegated or appoint a new delegatee. At all times, the delegatee appointed under this Section 4.4 shall serve in such capacity at the pleasure of the Board and the Committee.”
2.    Effect on the Plan.  Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
3.    Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of Delaware without regard to its principles of conflict of laws.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0001016130
<NAME>                       United Community Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                           1
<CURRENCY>                                                    US Dollars
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                 MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                        1
<CASH>                                                                 0
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       0
<PP&E>                                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  0
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                              80
<OTHER-SE>                                                           (80)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                           0
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       0
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.00
        



</TABLE>
#### In re Estate of Newton

Case Below: 173 N.C. App. 530

No. 586P05

Denied 12/01/05

Respondent’s (Jerry Lewis Newton III) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA04-1508)
Honorable Jack Wiech

CountyAttorney Cameron county Brownsville,Texas Dear Sir: OpinionNo. O-4747 Re: Sheriffs' -- Commissioners' Court -- control over courthouse. Your request for opinionupon.the following stated questions: "1. Does the Sheriff of Cameron.Countyhave the authority to determinewhether or not, as a matter of public con-~ venience, space in the lobby of the county courthousemay be used by a prlvate,individual for the purpose of conductinga cold drink and cigar starid? "2. Does said sheriffhave the authority to name such private individual? “3. Does the Sheriff of Cameron County have charge and control of the courthouse of said county to the extent that it iswithin his authority to determinewhether or not the court rooms thereof may be used forpurposes other than holding court, such as political meetings and club meetings of various kinds?" lias been received and carefully consideredby this department. In the case of Doflson vs. Marshall, Tex. Civ. App., 118S.W. (2d)‘621,writ refused, the court held that the action of the county commissioners'court of Grayson County, Texas in permitting an indlvldual to maintain a cigar and cold drink stand in an unused alcove in the rotunda of the county courthouse for a stipulatedrental, such privi-~ lege being terminable at the will of the commissioners' court, was dis& cretlonary,and could not be interferedwith by the courts in a suit to enjoin the granting and exercise of suchprivilege,where the exercise of suchprivilege would not interferewith the proper use of the courthouseor cause the county any expense, and would afford a convenience to those transacting business in the courthouse.HonorableJack Wiech, Page 2 (O-4747)

Upon the authority of the case of Anderson, County Judge, et al, v. Wood, Sheriff,Tex. Sup. Ct., 152 S. w. (2d) 1084, cited in your letter, and authoritiesthere cited, includingDodson v. Marshall, supra, we anewer each of your questions in the negative. Yours very truly ATl?ORNEYGENEBALOFTEXAS

By /e/ Wm. J. Fanning

Wm. J. Fanning Assistant WJF:nw:lm APPROVEDAUG 4, 1942 /s/ Gerald C. Mann ATTORNEY GENEF4ALOFTEXAS

APPROVED OPINION COMlaTTEE BY /8/ BWB CHAIRMAN
*Pursuant to 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 6, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 04-41551 Summary Calendar

_______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LORENA MARICELA TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Docket No. 5:04-CR-948-3

_________________________________________________________________ Before JONES, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Lorena Maricela Torres has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Torres has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from2

further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes
      - Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of PLM Equipment Growth Fund V (the
“Partnership”), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner and of
      the
      Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)  the
      Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.














/s/
      Richard K
      Brock


Richard
      K Brock


Chief
      Financial Officer of PLM
      Financial Services, Inc.


(Principal
      Financial
      Officer)


March
      29,
      2006
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: Notice of approval of Altol Petroleum Products Services, Inc., Toa Baja, PR, as a commercial gauger.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to CBP regulations, that Altol Petroleum Products Services, Inc., Toa Baja, PR, has been approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes for the next three years as of September 15, 2016.
 DATES: As of September 15, 2016, Altol Petroleum Products Services, Inc., Toa Baja, PR, was reapproved as a Customs-approved commercial gauger. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for September 2019.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Stephen Cassata, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, tel. 202-344-1060.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, that Altol Petroleum Products Services, Inc., Calle Gregorio Ledesma HMNN-55 URB., Levittown, Toa Baja, PR 00949, has been approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum products in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Altol Petroleum Products Services, Inc., is approved for the following gauging procedures for petroleum and certain petroleum products set forth by the American Petroleum Institute (API): API chapters
Title3
Gauging.7
Temperature Determination.8
Sampling.12
Calculation of Petroleum Quantities.17
Marine Measurements.
 Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific gauger service this entity is approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
                    *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*
                     Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories: 
                    *http://www.cbp.gov/​about/​labs-scientific/​commercial-gaugers-and-laboratories*. Dated: September 18, 2017. Ira S. Reese, Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.


[FR Doc. 2017-20663 Filed 9-26-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
#### Joanne FIELDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, dba United Airlines, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 98-35511.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 27, 2006.

Thad M. Guyer, Esq., Medford, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Risa L. Hall, Esq., Central Point, OR, Roy T. Englert, Jr., Esq, Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck *&*Untereiner LLP, Washington, DC, Michael T. Garone, Esq., Schwabe Williamson *&*Wyatt Pacwest Center, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellee.

*16Before: ALDISERT,* KLEINFELD, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

The Honorable Ruggiero J. Aldisert, Senior Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.

ORDER

On January 20, 2006, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming United Airlines’s petition for reorganization. Pursuant to this order, United Airline’s second amended plan of reorganization became effective February 1, 2006. On March 23, 2006, United Airlines filed its notice of discharge with this Court. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d) and the terms of the plan, the bankruptcy order discharges and releases United from certain claims and causes of action, including the pre-confirmation claims being advanced by appellant in this appeal. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 524(a), the discharge operates as an injunction against the continuation of any action to recover any debt discharged under the plan. The automatic stay is no longer in effect because the bankruptcy order has now been entered. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Each party shall bear its own costs.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission
 The following items have been deleted from the list of items scheduled for consideration at the Tuesday, September 26, 2017, Open Meeting and previously listed in the Commission's Notice of September 19, 2017.
                    ( print page 46058) 2
MEDIA
TITLE: Cable Television Technical and Operational Standards (MB Docket No. 12-217)
                             SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Report and Order that modernizes its cable television technical rules to reflect the cable industry's use of digital transmission systems.3
MEDIA
TITLE: Revitalization of the AM Radio Service (MB Docket No. 13-249)
                             SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Third Report and Order that will relax or eliminate certain rules pertaining to AM broadcasters employing and maintaining directional antenna arrays.
 Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2017-21241 Filed 9-29-17; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,
Mark A. Semanie, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of Carrollton Bancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)   such
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the
information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of
operations of Carrollton Bancorp.

/s/ Mark A. Semanie Mark A. Semanie Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 25, 2010


---
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

#### D. H. Brown v. James B. Kenley et al.

March 13, 1984

Case No. (Chancery) CH-4447

By JUDGE PHILIP L. RUSSO

The question is whether or not there is substantial evidence in the record to support the decision of the State Health Commissioner and was his decision arbitrary and capricious?

The court was much impressed with the manner in which the Hearing Officer conducted the hearing and his reasoning in recommending that the permit be issued. In making this statement, the court is not in any way demeaning the Commissioner or his reasoning.

It appears that the main basis for the rejection of the permit was the finding of gray mottles in the soil which is indicative of a high seasonal water table. However, it seems that the other findings of the Hearing Officer, namely that it is not possible to say when the property was affected by seasonal high water, and it can only be said that it occurred sometime during the soil forming process which could have been hundreds or thousands of years ago; all other properties in the vicinity of this lot are served by septic tanks and they seem to be functioning properly; no repair permits have been issued for lots in Block Al despite the fact that the houses are twenty-five to thirty years old; the closest city sewer line available to the said property is about 2400 feet from the property in question; the subject property was inspected and examined two days prior to *102the hearing and borings to the depth of four feet did not indicate the presence of high water at that time; the annual rainfall to the date of the hearing was above the average; no health hazards resulting from failing septic systems have been reported in the vicinity of where this property is located and no use can be made of the property without septic systems, and according to state representatives there are no viable alternatives. It seems to the court that all of the positive findings in favor of the issuance of the permit outweigh the one negative finding of the gray mottles in the soil which could have occurred hundreds or thousands of years ago.

The court is of the opinion that there is not substantial evidence in the record to support the decision of the State Health Commissioner and that his decision was arbitrary and capricious.