alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 14


                                 CODE OF ETHICS


In my role as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cinema
Ride, Inc. (the "Company"), I certify to you that I adhere to and advocate the
following principles and responsibilities governing my business and ethical
conduct:


To the best of my knowledge and ability:

1. I act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of
interest in personal and business relationships.

2. I provide constituents with information that is accurate, complete,
objective, relevant, timely and understandable, which I understand the Company
files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other
public communications made by the Company.

3. I comply with rules and regulations of federal, state, and local governments
and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.

4. I act with good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence
without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my independent judgment to be
subordinated.

5. I respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of my
work except for disclosure when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to
disclose. Confidential information acquired in the course of my work is not used
for personal advantage.

6. I share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to my
constituents needs.

7. I proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible party among peers in
my work environment.

8. I achieve responsible use of and control over all assets and resources
employed or entrusted to me.

9. I am accountable for adherence to this code of ethics.



Date:  May 13, 2004                            /s/  MITCHELL J. FRANCIS
                                               ------------------------
                                               Mitchell J. Francis
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 24



                        POWER OF ATTORNEY

                     AEP GENERATING COMPANY
      ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 1O-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
      __________________DECEMBER_31,_1995_________________


     The undersigned directors of AEP GENERATING COMPANY, an Ohio
corporation (the "Company"), do hereby constitute and appoint E.
LINN DRAPER, JR., G. P. MALONEY and P. J. DeMARIA, and each of
them, their attorneys-in-fact and agents, to execute for them, and
in their names, and in any and all of their capacities, the Annual
Report of the Company on Form lO-K, pursuant to Section 13 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1995, and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full
power and authority to do and perform every act and thing required
or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as
the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of
them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed these presents
this 28th day of February, 1996.



_/s/_P._J._DeMaria____________     _/s/_Wm._J._Lhota_____________
P. J. DeMaria                      Wm. J. Lhota


_/s/_E._Linn_Draper,_Jr.______     _/s/_G._P._Maloney____________
E. Linn Draper, Jr.                G. P. Maloney


_/s/_Henry_W._Fayne___________     _/s/_James_J._Markowsky_______
Henry W. Fayne                     James J. Markowsky


_/s/_John_R._Jones____________
John R. Jones




[ANNUAL\103.96C]<PAGE>
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK

#### American Interinsurance Exchange v. Kevin R. Pier, Richard L. Fulke, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., and Billy G. Hansard

May 16, 1985

Case No. (Chancery) C84-1674

By JUDGE JOHN W. WINSTON

Defendants Fulke and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (N.MI.) have demurred to the Bill for Declaratory Judgment because it seeks to determine a factual issue which should be determined in a tort action already pending in this Court and brought by Richard L. Fulke against Kevin R. Pier, L84-548.

In its Bill, the American Interinsurance Exchange (A.I.E.) seeks a prior determination whether it or N.M.I. owes insurance coverage to Kevin R. Pier under liability policies issued by these carriers for his negligent acts while driving an automobile as alleged in the pending lawsuit. A.I.E. contends that because Pier drove the insured vehicle without the prior permission of the named insured owner it does not owe him a defense in that suit.

Believing that a controversy of coverage exists between the parties and that defendants’ reliance upon *Williams*v. *Southern Bank of Norfolk,*203 Va. 657 (1962), is not appropriate here, the Court will overrule their demurrer and require them to answer the Bill within 15 days. *Criterion Insurance Co.*v. *Grange Mutual,*210 Va. 446 (1970), and *Reisen*v. *Aetna Life and Cas. Co., 225*Va. 327 (1983).
From: Debi Crow
To: Cindy Martinez Subject: RE: 04-13-00874-CR Mandate Acknowledgement Late
Date: Friday, June 12, 2015 12:25:48 PM

After looking in file we never have received it. Last correspondence from Court is Memorandum dated 2/19/2015.

From: Cindy Martinez [mailto:Cindy.Martinez@txcourts.gov] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 12:11 PM To: Debi Crow Subject: 04-13-00874-CR Mandate Acknowledgement Late

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-13-00874-CR
Trial Court Case Number: 12-2210-CR-C Style: George Garcia, Jr.

v. The State of Texas

On April 20, 2015, this Court issued the mandate in the above referenced case.

Rule 51.2, Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, requires “acknowledgment to the appellate clerk of the mandate’s receipt.” This Court has not received the required acknowledgment in this case.

Please advise me of the date the mandate was received in your office.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.



### Cynthia A. Martinez Fourth Court of Appeals Cadena-Reeves Justice Center 300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200 San Antonio, Texas 78205-3037

Phone: (210) 335-3853 E-Mail: Cindy.Martinez@txcourts.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7927

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. TIMOTHY LEON NOGGIN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:03-cr-00237-JRS; 3:07−cv−00071−JRS)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Leon Noggin, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Timothy Leon Noggin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Noggin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2236

___________

Joann Brewer Wiley, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Kurt Knickrehm, individually and in *

his official capacity as Director of the *

Department of Human Services, *

*

Defendants - Appellees, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

David Fray, in his individual capacity, * Eastern District of Arkansas.

*

Defendant, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Bob Clark, individually and in his *

official capacity as Conway Human *

Development Center Superintendent; *

Calvin Price, individually and in his *

official capacity as Conway Human *

Development Center Assistant; *

Beverly Peterson, individually and in *

her official capacity as Conway Human *

Development Center Total Care Team *

Leader; Marilyn Junyor, individually *

and in her official capacity as Nurse *

Service Administrator at Conway *

Human Development Center; Charles *

Green, in his official capacity as *

Director of Arkansas Department of *
1

The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.

-2-

Human Services, Division of Human *

Developmental Disabilities Services, *

*

Defendants - Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: December 18, 2003

Filed: May 13, 2004

___________

Before MELLOY, MCMILLIAN, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

The District Court1

 granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants on

Joann Brewer Wiley's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Arkansas Civil Rights

Act for speech retaliation, as well as on her claim under the Family and Medical

Leave Act. Wiley appeals only the speech-retaliation portion of the District Court's

decision.

Having carefully reviewed de novo the issues raised in this appeal, we hold that

the District Court correctly held that no reasonable juror could conclude that Wiley's

speech played a substantial role in any adverse employment action taken against her.

We also hold that the District Court properly analyzed Wiley's speech-retaliation

claim under the test set forth in Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education

v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977). Inasmuch as we agree entirely with the District

Court's resolution of the case, we need not, and do not, reach the argument of

defendants that they were entitled to qualified immunity from suit in this case.
-3-

Finding no error of law, we affirm on the basis of the District Court's thorough

and well-reasoned order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
#### Harris v. Matthews

Case Below: (COA05-28)

No. 479PA05

1. — •

2. Allowed 12/01/05

3. Denied 12/01/05

4. Dismissed as moot 12/01/05

5. Allowed for purpose of remand to COA for more thorough consideration in light of *Tubiolo v. Abundant Life Church, Inc.,*167 N.C. App. 324, 605 S.E.2d 161 (2004), *disc. rev. denied,*359 N.C. 326, 611 S.E.2d 853, *cert. denied,*126 S.Ct. 350.163 L. Ed. 2d 59 (2005) 12/01/05

1. Def’s (Matthews) NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA05-28)

2. Pits’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Def’s (Matthews) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

4. Pits’ Notice of Cross-Appeal

5. Def’s (Matthews) PWC to Review Order of COA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10K-SB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         240,341
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               311,584
<PP&E>                                       2,845,264
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,390,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,942,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          383,903
<BONDS>                                        845,853
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,546
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,544,621
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,942,080
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,377,674
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             228,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,121,284)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,121,284)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 58,331
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,062,953)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.82)
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.38



 Exhibit 10.38 
  





 
 Chairman and CEO 

[Name] 

AXA Equitable 

1 juillet 2016 / July 1, 2016 

J’ai le plaisir de vous informer que le Conseil d’Administration a décidé de vous attribuer en date du 6 juin 2016 des options de
souscription ou d’achat d’actions AXA comme suit: 
 I am pleased to inform you that the Board of Directors has decided to grant you on
June 6, 2016, options to subscribe to or purchase AXA shares as follows: 
  

			
	Nombre d’options / Number of options: 	  	[#]
		
	Prix d’exercice par action / Exercise price per share: 	  	        €

 Ces options pourront être levées durant la période du 6 juin 2019 au 5 juin 2026 selon le calendrier
suivant: 
 These options may be exercised during the period from June 6, 2019 to June 5, 2026, according to the following schedule: 

 

			
	 •  à compter du 6 juin 2019 / As from
June 6, 2019: 
	  	[#] options
		
	 •  à compter du 6 juin 2020 / As from
June 6, 2020: 
	  	[#] options
		
	 •  à compter du 6 juin 2021 / As from
June 6, 2021: 
	  	[#] options

 Le dernier tiers attribué, soit [#] options, sera exerçable à compter du 6 juin 2021 dès lors que
le cours du titre AXA aura performé au moins aussi bien que l’indice SXIP, soit depuis la date d’attribution des options, soit au cours des 3 dernières années. 

The last third of the options granted, i.e [#] options, will be exercisable from June 6, 2021 only if the AXA share has performed at least as well as
the SXIP index, either since the grant date or over the last three year period. 
 Vous trouverez le réglement de ce plan d’options de
souscription ou d’achat d’actions sur le site « My LTI ». Ce document doit être lu attentivement afin que vous puissiez prendre connaissance de vos droits et du cadre légal qui gouverne ce plan, notamment les
conditions d’exercice des options, et ce, avant votre décision d’accepter ou de refuser cette attribution qui devra être communiquée en ligne. 

You will find the rules of this subscription or purchase stock option plan on “My LTI” site. This document should be read carefully so that you
understand your rights under this plan and the legal framework within which the plan operates, especially the condition under which you may exercise the options, and this, before your decision to accept or refuse this grant directly online. 

Cordialement, 
 Yours sincerely, 

 
 



 
 Henri de Castries 
 25,
Avenue Matignon 75008 Paris, France 
 www.axa.com
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-88,298-02

EX PARTE IVERY DWAYNE DORSEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1097367-A IN THE 228th DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of

murder and sentenced to imprisonment for twenty years. 

On November 2, 2015, an order designating issues was signed by the trial court. In response

to this Court’s mandamus abatement order, the district clerk has forwarded Applicant’s habeas

corpus application. However, the trial court has not resolved the designated issues and entered

findings of fact and conclusions of law. Therefore, we remand this application to the 228th District

Court of Harris County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and enter
findings of fact and conclusions of law.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: September 12, 2018

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GOLDEN
     BEAR GOLF, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997,
     AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         4,158,913
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,883,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                   401,744
<INVENTORY>                                    3,073,346
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               22,566,978
<PP&E>                                         28,177,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,491,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 56,345,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,579,381
<BONDS>                                        8,105,540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       55,050
<OTHER-SE>                                     36,605,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   56,345,686
<SALES>                                        14,200,210
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               29,119,128
<CGS>                                          13,471,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  27,780,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,599,741
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               76,692
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             421,144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,470,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (871,350)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,599,332)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,599,332)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.29)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11.1


                            CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                          ---------------------------------------------
                                                                  1999                   1998
                                                          ---------------------   ---------------------
                                                           BASIC       DILUTED     BASIC       DILUTED
                                                          ---------   ---------   --------    ---------
<S>                                                       <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>     
Net Earnings (Loss) ...................................   $ (1,514)   $ (1,514)   $  1,258    $  1,258
                                                          ====================    ====================
Shares used in computing net earnings (loss) per share:
      Weighted average common shares and
        common share equivalents ......................     10,110      10,110       9,954       9,954


      Less treasury shares ............................       (697)       (697)       (555)       (555)

      Effect of shares issuable under stock options
        and warrants based on the treasury stock method       --           251        --           498
                                                          --------------------    --------------------

                                                             9,412       9,663       9,399       9,897
                                                          --------------------    --------------------
 Net earnings (loss)  per share .......................   $  (0.16)   $  (0.16)   $   0.13    $   0.13
                                                          ====================    ====================

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 10, 2021

No. 04-20-00505-CV

IN RE SOUTHEAST SNF, LLC d/b/a South East Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On October 12, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On November 6, 2020, 

the real party in interest filed a response. On November 24, 2020, the relator filed a reply. After 

considering the petition, the record, the response filed by the real party in interest, and the reply 

filed by relator, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the 

petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on February 10, 2021.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of February, 2021.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019-CI-22992, styled Villamar Ellison, individually and on behalf of the 

Estate of Olivia Ramirez, Deceased v. Southeast SNF, LLC d/b/a Southeast Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, pending 

in the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Laura Salinas presiding.