alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,UNITED STATES CODE)

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of BioSource International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “10-K Report”) that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

(1)   the 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   the information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the 10-K Report.

 

 
| Date: March 18, 2005 | /s/ TERRANCE J. BIEKER                                            |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |  Terrance  J. Bieker                                         |
|                 |  President and Chief Executive Officer                       |
|                 |                                                              |
| Date: March 18, 2005 | /s/ Alan I. Edrick                                                |   |
|                 |  Alan I. Edrick                                              |
|                 |  Executive Vice President and   Chief Financial Officer |

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to BiosourceInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Biosource International, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

* *

*The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be consideredfiled as part of the Form 10-K.*

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3265 

To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 to provide 

clarification regarding the applicability of exemptions relating to the 

transportation of agricultural commodities and farm supplies, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 26, 2011 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri (for himself, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. MANZULLO, 

Mr. AKIN, Mr. HANNA, Mr. JONES, Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. 

LONG, Ms. JENKINS, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. FORTENBERRY, Mr. TERRY, Mr. PETRI, Mr. SCHILLING, Mrs. NOEM, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. PAUL, Mrs. HARTZLER, 

Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois, 

Mr. DUFFY, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. LATHAM, 

Mr. LOEBSACK, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. WALSH of Illinois, Mr. LATTA, Mr. SCHRADER, Mrs. LUMMIS, 

Mrs. SCHMIDT, and Mr. CANSECO) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 

1999 to provide clarification regarding the applicability 

of exemptions relating to the transportation of agricultural commodities and farm supplies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3265 IH

1 SECTION 1. TRANSPORTATION OF AGRICULTURAL COM2 MODITIES AND FARM SUPPLIES. 

3 Section 229(a)(1) of the Motor Carrier Safety Im4 provement Act of 1999 (49 U.S.C. 31136 note) is amend5 ed to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(1) TRANSPORTATION OF AGRICULTURAL COM7 MODITIES AND FARM SUPPLIES.—Regulations pre8 scribed by the Secretary under sections 31136 and 

9 31502 regarding maximum driving and on-duty time 

10 for drivers used by motor carriers shall not apply 

11 during planting and harvest periods, as determined 

12 by each State, to— 

13 ‘‘(A) drivers transporting agricultural com14 modities in the State from the source of the ag15 ricultural commodities to a location within a 

16 100 air-mile radius from the source; 

17 ‘‘(B) drivers transporting farm supplies for 

18 agricultural purposes in the State from a whole19 sale or retail distribution point of the farm sup20 plies to a farm or other location where the farm 

21 supplies are intended to be used within a 100 

22 air-mile radius from the distribution point; or 

23 ‘‘(C) drivers transporting farm supplies for 

24 agricultural purposes in the State from a whole25 sale distribution point of the farm supplies to a 

26 retail distribution point of the farm supplies 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3265 IH

1 within a 100 air-mile radius from the wholesale 

2 distribution point.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,459,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,764,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   127,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,472,000
<PP&E>                                       5,486,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,284,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,680,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,691,000
<BONDS>                                          7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,332,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,680,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,065,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,485,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,423,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                68,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,058,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   465,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            593,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   593,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT HARRY LEE BUTLER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4825 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed July 3, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Frank Quesada, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Adaway v. State, 902 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 2005); Lightbourne v. State, 438 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 1983); Phillips v. State, 807 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Gonzalez v. State, 50 So. 3d 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

KHOUZAM, C.J., and SLEET and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

#### Horsemen International, Inc. v. Le

November 6, 1986

Case No. (Law) 10259

By JUDGE DONALD H. KENT

This matter came before the Court on the motion of the plaintiff for summary judgment.

The Court, having considered the motion for judgment and grounds of defense, finds that there are issues of fact which are genuinely in dispute. The defenses alleged by the defendant are not time barred since limitation statutes are not applicable to defenses, but apply only where affirmative relief is sought. Applying this principle of law, the Court further finds that the Third Party Motion for Judgment is time barred.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report)
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Dean J. DouglasDean J. DouglasPresident and Chief Executive Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 18

- 00552

- CV

In re Kyle Holland

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

_______________________ ___________________

Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland

Filed: August 24, 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2638 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2638

      To provide for the issuance of a veterans health care stamp.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2009

  Mr. Shuler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide for the issuance of a veterans health care stamp.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Stamp to Honor American 
Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. VETERANS HEALTH CARE STAMP.

    (a) In General.--In order to afford a convenient way for members of 
the public to contribute to funding for veterans health care, including 
new shelters, improved medical facilities, medical assistance, and 
prescription assistance for veterans, the United States Postal Service 
shall provide for the issuance and sale of a special postage stamp, 
hereinafter referred to as the ``veterans health care stamp'', in 
accordance with subsections (b) and (c).
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--The issuance and sale of the veterans 
health care stamp shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, United 
States Code, except that--
            (1) the rate established for such stamp shall be equal to 
        the rate of postage that would otherwise regularly apply, plus 
        a differential of 25 percent;
            (2) all amounts becoming available from the sale of such 
        stamp--
                    (A) shall be transferred to the Department of 
                Veterans Affairs in accordance with section 416(d) of 
                such title; and
                    (B) shall be used by the Department of Veterans 
                Affairs to carry out the purposes described in 
                subsection (a); and
            (3) such stamp shall not be subject to any numerical 
        limitation under section 416(e)(1)(C) of such title.
                                 <all>
```
----

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Mel G. Riggs                                        |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Mel G. Riggs                                            |
| President and Chief Executive Officer                   |
| of Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                       |
| Managing General Partner of                             |
| Southwest Royalties Institutional Income Fund X-A, L.P. |
|                                                    |
| March 29, 2011                                          |
|                                                    |
|                                                    |
| /s/ Michael L. Pollard                                  |
| Michael L. Pollard                                      |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer       |
| of Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                       |
| Managing General Partner of                             |
| Southwest Royalties Institutional Income Fund X-A, L.P. |
|                                                    |
| March 29, 2011                                          |
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in (a) the Registration  Statement
on Form S-8 (No. 333-82959) of Vizacom,  Inc. (the "Company")  pertaining to the
Company's  1994  Long  Term  Incentive  Plan,  (b)  the  Company's  Registration
Statement  on Form S-8  (No.  333-82951)  pertaining  to the  Company's  Outside
Director and Advisor Stock Option Plan, (c) the Company's Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (No.  333-55677)  pertaining  to 2,107,712  shares of the  Company's
Common  Stock and 29,267  options to  purchase  shares of the  Company's  Common
Stock,  (d) the  Company's  Registration  Statement on Form S-3 (No.  333-80181)
pertaining  to  3,375,877  shares of the  Company's  Common  Stock  and  167,052
warrants to purchase  shares of the Company's  Common  Stock,  (e) the Company's
Registration  Statement  on Form S-3 (No.  333-93087)  pertaining  to  1,938,191
shares  of the  Company's  Common  Stock,  and  (f) the  Company's  Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No.  333-34950)  pertaining  to  5,413,231  shares of the
Company's  Common Stock, of our report dated March 27, 2000 (with respect to the
reissuance  of  the  report  of  independent  auditors  on  the  1999  financial
statements of Serif  (Europe)  Limited,  January 26, 2001),  with respect to our
audit of the financial  statements of the Company and our report dated March 20,
2000  with  respect  to our audit of the  financial  statements  of  Renaissance
Computer Art Center,  Inc.,  included in the  amendment on form  10-KSB/A to the
Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 1999,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Our report dated March 27, 2000 (with respect to the reissuance of the report of
independent auditors on the 1999 financial statements of Serif (Europe) Limited,
January 26, 2001) with respect to our audit of the  financial  statements of the
Company contains  explanatory  paragraphs  regarding a Federal income tax matter
described in Note 8 to the financial statements and the reissuance of the report
of  independent  auditors on the 1999  financial  statements  of Serif  (Europe)
Limited described in Note 16 to the financial statements.


/s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP
Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
January 26, 2001
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 November 16, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-11452

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 01-00076-CR-4-SPM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

ROBERTO J. MONTELONGO, 

a.k.a. Roberto Juarez, 

a.k.a. Roberto Montelongo Juarez, 

a.k.a. Juan Ismael Juares, 

a.k.a. Betto Juarez, 

a.k.a. Juan Ismael Juarez, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(November 16, 2006)
2

Before ANDERSON, BARKETT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Roberto J. Montelongo appeals his sentence of 50 months for illegal reentry

into the United States. Montelongo argues that the district court violated section

3553(a) because it failed both to state and find that Montelongo’s sentence was

“not greater than necessary.” 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The advisory Sentencing

Guidelines range was 46 to 57 months of imprisonment, and Montelongo did not

object at sentencing. We affirm.

“When a defendant fails to object to an error before the district court, we

review the argument for plain error.” United States v. Raad, 406 F.3d 1322, 1323

(11th Cir.), cert. denied __ U.S. __, 126 S. Ct. 196 (2005). Plain error occurs

where “‘(1) there is an error; (2) that is plain or obvious; (3) affecting the

defendant's substantial rights in that it was prejudicial and not harmless; and (4)

that seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial

proceedings.’” Id. (quoting United States v. Hall, 314 F.3d 565, 566 (11th Cir.

2002)). The district court did not err.

“[N]othing . . . requires [a] district court to state on the record that it has

explicitly considered each of the [section] 3553(a) factors or to discuss each of the

[section] 3553(a) factors.” United States v. Scott, 426 F.3d 1324, 1329 (11th Cir.
3

2005). In addition, we review the sentence imposed by the district court for

reasonableness and “ordinarily . . . expect a sentence within the Guidelines range to

be reasonable.” United States v. Talley, 431 F.3d 784, 788 (11th Cir. 2005). 

Because Montelongo’s sentence “achieve[s] the purposes of sentencing as stated in

[section] 3553(a),” it was reasonable. Id.

AFFIRMED.
VIZACOM INC.

                              List of Subsidiaries
                                (April 2, 2001)
                                                  State or Other Jurisdiction of

Name                                              Incorporation or Organization
----                                              ------------------------------
Dialogue 24 GmbH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        Germany
Dialog24 Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       Delaware
Digital Paper, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     California
Grafox Limited. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom
Precision Software Limited. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom
PSL GmbH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        Germany
PWR Systems, Inc. (d/b/a Vizy Interactive - PWR Systems). . . . .       Delaware
Renaissance Multimedia, Inc. (d/b/a Vizy Interactive New York). .       Delaware
Software Publishing Asia Pacific Corporation. . . . . . . . . . .     California
Software Publishing Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       Delaware
Software Publishing Corporation Belgium . . . . . . . . . . . . .     California
Software Publishing Corporation Europe. . . . . . . . . . . . . .     California
Software Publishing Corporation SPC (Italia) s.r.l. . . . . . . .          Italy
Software Publishing Corporation Netherlands . . . . . . . . . . .     California
Software Publishing Corporation (Scandinavia) AB. . . . . . . . .         Sweden
Software Publishing Deutschland GmbH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        Germany
Software Publishing France, SARL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         France
Software Publishing International Corporation (FSC) . . . . . . .       Barbados
Software Publishing Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom
VisualCities.com Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       Delaware
Vizy Interactive Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       Delaware
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2713 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements in 

the service disabled veterans’ insurance program of the Department of 

Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2009 

Mr. DONNELLY of Indiana (for himself, Mr. HALL of New York, Mr. 

BOOZMAN, Ms. HERSETH SANDLIN, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. SPACE, Mr. 

ELLSWORTH, Mr. HILL, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. UPTON, and Mr. ARCURI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain 

improvements in the service disabled veterans’ insurance 

program of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disabled Veterans Life 

5 Insurance Enhancement Act’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2713 IH

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT OF SERVICE DISABLED VETERANS’ 

2 INSURANCE. 

3 (a) OPEN PERIOD.—Section 1922 of title 38, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(d)(1) The Secretary shall provide for a two-year pe7 riod beginning on the date of the enactment of this sub8 section during which a person described in paragraph (2) 

9 may submit an application for insurance under this section 

10 and payment of premiums for such insurance and be 

11 granted insurance under this section. 

12 ‘‘(2) A person described in this paragraph is a person 

13 who would be eligible under subsection (a) for insurance 

14 under this section except that the person did not submit 

15 application in writing and payment of premiums within 

16 two years from the date that the service-connection of the 

17 person’s disability was determined by the Secretary.’’. 

18 (b) REVISION OF PREMIUMS SCHEDULE.—Such sec19 tion is further amended in subsection (a)— 

20 (1) by striking ‘‘the Commissioners 1941 

21 Standard Ordinary Table of Mortality’’ the first 

22 place it appears and inserting ‘‘an appropriate and 

23 current mortality table selected by the Secretary’’; 

24 and 

25 (2) by striking ‘‘the Commissioners 1941 

26 Standard Ordinary Table of Mortality’’ the second 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2713 IH

1 place it appears and inserting ‘‘such mortality 

2 table’’. 

3 (c) INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF PROTEC4 TION.—Such section is further amended in subsection (b), 

5 by striking ‘‘$10,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$100,000’’. 

6 (d) INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF SUPPLEMENTAL IN7 SURANCE FOR TOTALLY DISABLED VETERANS.—Section 

8 1922A(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 

9 striking ‘‘$20,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000’’. 

10 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply with respect to an insurance policy 

12 issued on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS