alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION 

OF MARYLAND 

Petitioner 

V. 

JOHN FRANKLIN BLEVINS 

Respondent 

IN THE 

COURT OF APPEALS 

OF MARYLAND 

Misc. Docket AG No. 78 

September Term, 2018 

ORDER 

UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by 

Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the 

Respondent, John Franklin Blevins, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, in which the 

Respondent admits that he violated Rules 5.3, 5.4, 5.7, and 8.4 (c) and (d) of the 

Maryland Attorneys' Rules of Professional Conduct. The Court, having considered the 

Petition. it is this 18th day of April, 2019 

ORDERED, that Respondent, John Franklin Blevins, be, and he hereby is, 

indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland with the right 

to petition for reinstatement in 90 days, effective immediately; and it is further 

ORDERED, that, the Clerk of the Court shall remove the name John 

Franklin Blevins from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to 

the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of 

all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-736(d). 

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. 

Senior Judge
EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

Earnings per share has been calculated in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128 "Earnings Per Share"
issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. SFAS No. 128 requires
presentation of earnings per share on a basic computation and a diluted
computation. The basic computation divides net income by only the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the year and the diluted
computation gives effect to the weighted average dilutive common shares that
were outstanding during the year.

The following data shows the amounts used in computing earnings per share and
the effect on income and the weighted average number of shares in thousands of
dilutive potential common stock.


    Years Ended December 31,                       2003     2002     2001
                                                  ------   ------   ------
    Income available to common shareholders:
    Used in basic earnings per share              $4,644   $4,508   $4,358
                                                  ------   ------   ------
    Used in diluted earnings per share            $4,644   $4,508   $4,358
                                                  ------   ------   ------
    Weighted average number of common
      shares used in basic earnings per share *    3,282    3,280    3,254
    Effect of dilutive securities:
    Stock options *                                   63       48       58
                                                  ------   ------   ------
    Weighted average number of common
      and dilutive potential common shares
      used in diluted earnings per share *         3,345    3,328    3,312
                                                  ------   ------   ------

* - 2002 and 2001 have been restated for 10 percent stock dividends in May 2001
    and February 2003.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 17, 2020

b0414 

# Order

Clerk April 17, 2020

159642

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 159642

COA: 342408

Wayne CC: 15

- 003289

- FH

WILLIAM LARENZO SHOULDERS,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 2 8, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

M ARKMAN , J. ( dissenting ).

I respectfully dissent because I would not deny leave to appeal but instead would

remand for resentencing. Contrary to MCL 769.34(3)(a), which provides that “[t]he court

shall not use an individual’s . . . race . . . to depart from the appropriate sentence range,”

the trial court here expressly referenced defen dant’s race in order to justify its departure

sentence below the legislative guidelines. For this reason alone, resentencing is warranted.

Furthermore, however, the sentence of probation imposed, in my view, constitutes an abuse

of sentencing discretion in light of the intrinsic seriousness of the offense at issue

-- operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated causing death, MCL 257.625(4). That is, for

this offense, the sentencing guidelines always provide for a sentence of imprisonment, even

where all o ther offense variables ( beyond O ffense V ariable 3

, which is necessarily scored

at 50 points ) are scored at zero and all prior record variables are also scored at zero. See

MCL 777.12f; MCL 777.33(2)(c); MCL 777.64.
```

[United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions (Plum Book), 1996]
[Independent Agencies and Government Corporations]
[Trade and Development Agency]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

The Plum Book (United States Government Policy
        and Supporting Positions): 1996 EditionBRANCH: EXECUTIVE TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCYLocationPosition TitleName of IncumbentPay PlanType of Appt.Level Grade or PayTenureExpiresWashington, DCDeputy DirectorNancy D. FrameESCA............................Washington, DCGeneral CounselKenneth E. FriesESCA............................Washington, DCDirectorJoseph J. GrandmaisonEXPASIII..................
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.1

                                 Certifications
                                 --------------


I, Scott R. Sand, Chief Executive Officer certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Ingen Technologies, Inc.
(formerly known as Creative Recycling Technologies, Inc.)

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report ("Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 22, 2007

/s/ Scott R. Sand
-----------------
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 2, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence A. Denton, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Lawrence A. Denton
-------------------------------------
Lawrence A. Denton
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
August 11, 2006
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40143

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

LARRY WARD CRAGUN,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 513

Filed: May 23, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Kootenai County. Hon. Benjamin R. Simpson, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and concurrent sentences of a unified term of life, with 

thirty years determinate, for murder of the first degree; a determinate term of 

fifteen years for attempted murder; and determinate terms of fifteen years for two 

counts of aggravated battery, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Larry Ward Cragun pled guilty to murder of the first degree, Idaho Code § 18-4001;

attempted murder, I.C. § 18-4001; and two counts of aggravated battery, I.C. § 18-907. The 

district court sentenced Cragun to a unified term of life, with thirty years determinate, for the 

murder of the first degree conviction and a determinate term of fifteen years for each of the 

remaining convictions. The district court also ordered the sentences to run concurrent with each 

other. Cragun appeals, contending his sentences are excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 
2

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 

1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Cragun’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROSA SERRANO,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00190-CR

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20170D00317)

O R D E R

Appellant has filed a pro se motion requesting the appointment of appellate counsel. The 

El Paso County District Clerk has provided the Court with copies of the trial court’s orders 

permitting Appellant’s appointed attorneys, Mr. Leonard Morales and Mr. Greg Anderson, to 

withdraw from representing Appellant on appeal. There is nothing to indicate Appellant’s 

financial circumstances have changed since she has been incarcerated. Therefore, we GRANT the 

motion to appoint appellate counsel for this appeal only. All other relief requested in Appellant’s 

motion is DENIED. The trial court is ORDERED to appoint counsel to represent Appellant in this

appeal. The appointment of counsel does not extend to Appellant’s pending civil appeals (cause 

numbers 08-16-00291-CV and 08-16-00327-CV). The trial court shall forward the order of 

appointment to the District Clerk of El Paso County, Texas on or before December 19, 2017. The 

District Clerk of El Paso County, shall prepare and file with this Court a Supplemental Clerk’s 

Record to include said order of appointment on or before December 22, 2017.

 IT IS SO ORDERED this 6

th day of December, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,552,857
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,750,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        23,335,084
<LOANS>                                     27,353,855
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (256,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,427,353
<DEPOSITS>                                  42,319,549
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,648,594
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            251,599
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,762
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              58,427,353
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                528,420
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              379,987
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               908,407
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             427,593
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,230
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          418,584
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  100,005
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              10,919
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                452,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (119,992)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (119,992)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (119,992)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.27
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             (460,005)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            (460,005)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         (318,747)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      (141,258)
        

</TABLE>
AMENDMENT TO SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE

 

	 

	 




THIS AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of March 5, 2018, by and between MOUNT TAM BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada corporation (“Maker”), and 0851229 BC Ltd. ("Holder”).

 

RECITALS

 

A.Maker and Holder first entered into that certain Convertible Promissory Note on March 23, 2016 (the “March Note”); and  

 

B.During the existence of the March Note, Maker and Holder have amended the same at various times and in various ways; and 

 

C.The March Note was later amended and restated by Maker and Holder pursuant to that certain Amended and Restated Secured Convertible Promissory Note on June 13, 2016 (the “June Note”); and 

 

D.Maker and Holder have determined to amend the June Note pursuant to the terms set forth herein.  

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.The June Note is hereby amended by extending the Maturity Date to September 30, 2018. 

 

2.This Amendment supersedes any and all other provisions of the June Note which are in conflict with this instrument. 

 

3.This Amendment constitutes the full and complete agreement between the parties hereto.  All other provisions of the June Note not modified herein shall remain in full force and effect and are incorporated herein. 

 

 

 

[Signature page follows]


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Secured Convertible Promissory Note effective as of the effective date set forth above.

 

 

 

	 

	MAKER:

 

MOUNT TAM BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

 

By:/s/ Richard Marshak 

Name:Richard Marshak 

Title:Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

 


	 

	HOLDER:

 

0851229 BC Ltd.

 

 

By:/s/ Doug Froese 

Name:Doug Froese 

Title: Director 





Signature Page to Amendment to Secured Convertible Promissory Note
<PAGE>

EX-99.1
                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-QSB (the
"Report") of Amplidyne, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30,
2002,  I,  Devendar  S.  Bains, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer  of  the  Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of  my  knowledge  and  belief,  that:

          (1)  the  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

          (2)  the  information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.

                            /s/ Devendar S. Bains
                            -------------------------
                            Devendar S. Bains
                            Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
                            Officer


November  18,  2002









                                       -17-
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
USN Communications, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         87,454
<SECURITIES>                                    8,181
<RECEIVABLES>                                  28,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                    4,537
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              120,996
<PP&E>                                         20,462
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                171,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          28,223
<BONDS>                                       172,144
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          57,277
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       74,714
<OTHER-SE>                                    161,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  171,200
<SALES>                                        47,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               47,200
<CGS>                                          41,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  41,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              103,913
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                4,705
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             15,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (109,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (109,892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                (109,892)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (15.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (15.55)


</TABLE>