alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | a) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or                  78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the Company                  as of the dates and for the periods covered by the                  Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November    ,                  2007 | /s/                  Deborah C. Wright |
|---------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Dated                                                   | Deborah                  C. Wright     |

----
V 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3152 

For the relief of Patricia Donahue, individually and in her capacity as administratrix of the estate of Michael J. Donahue; Michael T. Donahue; 

Shawn Donahue; and Thomas Donahue. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2011 

Mr. KEATING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Patricia Donahue, individually and in her 

capacity as administratrix of the estate of Michael J. 

Donahue; Michael T. Donahue; Shawn Donahue; and 

Thomas Donahue. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF THE DONAHUE FAMILY. 

4 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall 

5 pay, out of funds not otherwise appropriated, the amount 

6 of $6,335,100.00, the judgment entered by the United 

7 States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on 

8 May 6, 2009, plus interest as provided by section 1304 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3152 IH

1 of title 31, United States Code, to compensate Patricia 

2 Donahue, individually and in her capacity as administra3 trix of the estate of Michael J. Donahue, Michael T. 

4 Donahue, Shawn Donahue, and Thomas Donahue (the 

5 ‘‘Donahues’’), for costs related to and damages arising 

6 from the murder of Michael J. Donahue in Massachusetts 

7 in May 1982 as described in Docket No. 01–10433–RCL, 

8 filed in the United States District Court for the District 

9 of Massachusetts, and Docket Nos. 09–1950 and 10–1766 

10 filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the First 

11 Circuit. 

12 (b) SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.—The payment under 

13 subsection (a) shall be in full satisfaction of all claims of 

14 the Donahues against the United States in connection 

15 with the matter described in such subsection. 

16 (c) NO INFERENCE OF LIABILITY.—Nothing in this 

17 Act shall be construed as an inference of liability on the 

18 part of the United States. 

19 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS’ AND AGENTS’ FEES. 

20 (a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for an amount 

21 exceeding 25 percent of the amount paid pursuant to sec22 tion 1 to be paid to, or received by, any agent or attorney 

23 for any service rendered in connection with the payment 

24 under this Act, as set forth in the Federal Tort Claims 

25 Act, (28 U.S.C. 2678 of title 28, United States Code). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3152 IH

1 (b) ENFORCEMENT.—Any person who violates sub2 section (a) shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be 

3 fined under title 18, United States Code. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  FOUNDED ON PAGES 1-3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-QSB,  FOR THE  YEAR-TO-DATE  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                 0001016151
<NAME>                                           AMPLIDYNE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                                     1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
<CASH>                                                 1,966,289
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            310,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                              40,510
<INVENTORY>                                              288,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       2,538,081
<PP&E>                                                   606,049
<DEPRECIATION>                                           263,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         2,916,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    475,320
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                     446
<OTHER-SE>                                             2,225,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           2,916,061
<SALES>                                                  321,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         346,963
<CGS>                                                    371,304
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            493,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         274,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         5,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (425,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (426,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (426,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (.10)
        



</TABLE>
REDUCTION OF VOTING AGE

TWENTY-SIXTH AMENDMENT

SECTIONS 1 AND 2. The right of citizens of the United States,

who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

THE EIGHTEEN-YEAR-OLD VOTE

In extending the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in 1970,1 Congress

included a provision lowering the age qualification to vote in all elections, federal, state, and local, to 18.2 In a divided decision, the Supreme Court held that Congress was empowered to lower the age

qualification in federal elections, but voided the application of the

provision in all other elections as beyond congressional power.3 Confronted thus with the possibility that they might have to maintain

two sets of registration books and go to the expense of running separate election systems for federal elections and for all other elections, the states were receptive to the proposing of an Amendment

by Congress to establish a minimum age qualification at 18 for all

elections, and ratified it promptly.4

1 79 Stat. 437, as extended and amended by 84 Stat. 314, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971 et

seq.

2 Title 3, 84 Stat. 318, 42 U.S.C. § 1973bb.

3 Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112 (1970).

4 S. REP. NO. 26, 92d Cong., 1st Sess. (1971); H.R. REP. NO. 37, 92d Cong., 1st

Sess. (1971).

2305
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,322-01

EX PARTE CHAD MICHAEL BOUTWELL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 15-116A IN THE 130TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM MATAGORDA COUNTY

Per curiam. SLAUGHTER, J., filed a concurring and dissenting opinion in which KELLER,

P.J., and RICHARDSON, J., joined. YEARY, J., dissented.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a child and sentenced to ninety-nine

years’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Boutwell v. State,

No. 13-16-00135-CR (Tex. App. —Corpus Christi-Edinburg July 6, 2017). Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

Applicant contends among others that trial counsel was ineffective because counsel failed

to properly investigate, prepare and present expert testimony. Applicant also claims trial counsel

failed to investigate and present mitigating evidence during the punishment phase of trial. Based on
2

the record, the trial court has determined that trial counsel’s performance was deficient and that

Applicant was prejudiced.

Relief is granted. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). The judgment in cause

number 15-116 in the 130th District Court of Matagorda County is set aside, and Applicant is

remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Matagorda County to answer the charges as set out in the

indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within ten days from the date of

this Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: December 8, 2021

Do not publish
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 8, 2020 a0505

Order 

Clerk

May 8, 2020

157986

BRONSON METHODIST HOSPITAL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 157986

COA: 333275

Kalamazoo CC: 2015-000541-AV

FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN and FARM

BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN,

Defendants-Appellees.

_______________________________________/

By order of October 2, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the March 27, 

2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in W A 

Foot Mem Hosp v Mich Assigned Claims Plan (Docket No. 156622). On order of the 

Court, the case having been decided on October 25, 2019, 504 Mich 985 (2019), the 

application is again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the cases of Pearce v 

Eaton Co Rd Comm (Docket No. 158069) and Brugger v Midland Co Bd of Rd Comm’rs

(Docket No. 158304) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in 

those cases may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we 

ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those 

cases.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 3, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence A. Denton, President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Lawrence A. Denton
----------------------------------------
Lawrence A. Denton
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
August 29, 2005
EXHIBIT 32-2


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax Credit
Fund II,  L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Thomas J. Riha, Chief Financial  Officer of
WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Date:  July 30, 2009
Annual Performance Incentive Plan for 2011



 EXHIBIT 10(e)(19) 
 Annual Performance Incentive Plan for 2011 (“2011 APIP”) 
 Under the 2011 APIP, executive officers of
the Company are eligible to receive performance related cash payments. Payments are, in general, only made if performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) are met. 

The Committee approved incentive opportunities for 2011, expressed as a percentage of base salary for each participating officer. Certain additional goals were
established for some officers based on business unit goals. The Committee also established overall threshold, target and maximum measures of performance for the 2011 APIP. The performance measures and weightings are adjusted Earnings per Share
(weighted at 40%), Core Cash Flow from Operations (weighted at 40%) and Revenue Growth (adjusted to exclude the impact of changes in the translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars) (weighted at 20%). 

Individual awards will be subject to the review and approval of the Committee following the completion of the 2011 fiscal year, with payment to be made within the
first four months of 2012.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 334 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 334

 To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from hiring new employees to 
enforce the Federal Government's invasion into the health care lives of 
                           American citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2011

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from hiring new employees to 
enforce the Federal Government's invasion into the health care lives of 
                           American citizens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prevent IRS Overreach Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IRS FROM HIRING NEW EMPLOYEES TO ENFORCE PATIENT 
              PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND HEALTH CARE AND 
              EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF 2010.

    No position within the Internal Revenue Service may be filled, by 
transfer or any other appointment taking effect on or after the date of 
enactment of this Act, if the duties and responsibilities of such 
position include the enforcement of any provision of, or amendment made 
by, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or the Health Care 
and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                         ------------------------------

TEAM America Corporation has the following subsidiaries, all of which are wholly
owned:

Ohio corporations:

     Team America 3, Inc.; Team America 4, Inc; Team America 5, Inc.; Team
America 7, Inc.; Team America 8, Inc.; Team America 10, Inc.; Team America 11,
Inc.; Team America 12, Inc.; Team America 13, Inc.; Team America 14, Inc.; Team
America 15, Inc.; Team America 16, Inc.; Team America 17, Inc.; Team America 18,
Inc.; Team America 19, Inc.; Team America 20, Inc.; Columbus E.L., Inc.; Team
America of Orlando, Inc.; Team America of Ohio, Inc.; Team America Professional
Employer, Inc.; Team America of California, Inc.; Team America of Texas, Inc.;
TEAM America of Washington, Inc.; and TEAM America of Oregon, Inc.

Michigan corporations:

                        The Personnel Department, Incorporated
                        The Personnel Department of Metropolitan Detroit, Inc.
                        PTM Management Company, Incorporated

Indiana corporation:

                        The Personnel Department-Midwest, Inc.

Idaho corporation:

                        Aspen Consulting Group, Inc.

Montana corporation:

                        TEAM America of Montana, Inc. (formerly Company 1, Inc.)

Mississippi:

                        TEAM America Mid-South, Inc.

Tennessee:

                        TEAM America of Tennessee, Inc.

Utah:
                        TEAM America of Utah, Inc. (formerly Paymaster, Inc.)
ACCEPTED 07-15-00114-CR SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

AMARILLO, TEXAS 8/6/2015 9:28:02 AM Vivian Long, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 187 (Thursday, September 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 45303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20946]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-17-046]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: October 6, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-587 and 731-TA-1385-1386 (Preliminary) 
(Titanium Sponge from Japan and Kazakhstan). The Commission is 
currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations on October 
10, 2017; views of the Commission are currently scheduled to be 
completed and filed on October 17, 2017.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission:

    Issued: September 26, 2017.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-20946 Filed 9-26-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

t0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148695

LINDA A. KIRBY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 148695

COA: 316964

MCAC: 12-000030

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 2, 2014 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 187 (Thursday, September 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 45262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20810]



[[Page 45262]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-34-2017]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 74--Baltimore, Maryland; Authorization 
of Production Activity; Mercedes Benz USA, LLC; (Accessorizing 
Passenger Motor Vehicles); Baltimore, Maryland

    On May 8, 2017, the City of Baltimore, Maryland, grantee of FTZ 74, 
submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ 
Board on behalf of Mercedes Benz USA, LLC, within Site 6 of FTZ 74.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (82 FR 25240, June 1, 2017). On 
September 5, 2017, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including Section 400.14, and further subject to a restriction that 
carpets of man-made fibers would be admitted to the FTZ in privileged 
foreign status (19 CFR 146.41).

    Dated: September 22, 2017.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-20810 Filed 9-27-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

SHAWN MIMS,

Petitioner

v.

HON. CHRIS R. WOGAN JUDGE, 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 121 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The 

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.