alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,691
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,317
<PP&E>                                         159,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5,213)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,635
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,504
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,871
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,891
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,756
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,135
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,135
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1994
<CASH>                                          13,404
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      11,248,150
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,834,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,755,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          485,164
<BONDS>                                      6,275,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,862,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,755,227
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,028,351
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  443,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             541,374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (482,279)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (482,279)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (482,279)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (94.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

# ** **

***CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350***

 

In connection with the September 30,2008 Form 10-Q of Cornell Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, John R. Nieser, Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

2.            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respectsthe financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ John R. Nieser                                                          |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | John R. Nieser, Chief Financial Officer,Senior Vice President and Treasurer |
|   | November 7, 2008                                                       |

 

Note:  The certification the registrant furnishes inthis exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to theliabilities of that Section. Registration Statements or other documents filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit,except as otherwise stated in such filing.

 

----
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State 

ex rel. Tolle v. Spherion of Mid-Ohio, Inc., Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-2923.] 

NOTICE 

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an 

advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to 

promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 

South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other 

formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before 

the opinion is published. 

SLIP OPINION NO. 2017-OHIO-2923

THE STATE EX REL. TOLLE, APPELLEE, v. SPHERION OF MID-OHIO, INC.,

ET AL., APPELLANTS. 

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 

may be cited as State ex rel. Tolle v. Spherion of Mid-Ohio, Inc., Slip Opinion 

No. 2017-Ohio-2923.] 

Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Cordell v. 

Pallet Cos., Inc.

(No. 2015-1717—Submitted April 4, 2017—Decided May 23, 2017.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, 

No. 14AP-717, 2015-Ohio-3593. 

_______________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of 

State ex rel. Cordell v. Pallet Cos., Inc., ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-8446, ___ 

N.E.3d ___. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and FRENCH, O’NEILL, FISCHER, and DEWINE, JJ., concur. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

O’DONNELL and KENNEDY, JJ., dissent and would schedule oral argument 

and issue a ruling on the merits following oral argument. 

_________________ 

Badnell & Dick Co., L.P.A., and Kelly L. Badnell, for appellee. 

Lee M. Smith & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Elizabeth P. Weeden, for 

appellant Spherion of Mid-Ohio, Inc. 

Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Kevin J. Reis, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellant Industrial Commission. 

_________________
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF CLIFTON FORGE

#### Jean B. Nicely v. City of Clifton Forge

March 1, 1983

By JUDGE DUNCAN M. BYRD, JR.

The issue presented in this motion for summary judgment is compliance with § 8.01-222, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. The purpose of the statute is to enable a city of make a prompt investigation of tort claims, to correct dangerous or defective conditions, and where justified, to avoid the expense and delay of litigation by making voluntary settlement with the claimant. *O’Neil*v. *City of Richmond,*141 Va. 168 (1925).

The notice required by this section is mandatory and is an essential element of the action. *Daniel*v. *Richmond,*199 Va. 490 (1957). However, substantial compliance to accomplish the statutory purpose is all that is required. *City of Portsmouth*v. *Cilumbrello,*204 Va. 11 (1963).

The notice has two essential elements applicable here. The first is that it must be "a written statement by the claimant, his agent, attorney or representative of the nature of the claim and of the time and place at which the injury is alleged to have occurred or been received." The second element is that it must be "filed with the city attorney or town attorney, or with the mayor, or chief executive within six months after such cause of action accrued."

I believe that the "written complaint" form filed by Officer C. E. Smith in this case constitutes substantial compliance with the first element. *Heller*v. *City of Virginia Beach,*213 Va. 683 (1973). In *88this case the evidence *at this point*discloses that a copy of the complaint was sent to the attorney for the Commonwealth but not to the City attorney. The claimant had a brief unscheduled discussion with the City Manager concerning the matter within the six month period but Officer Smith’s written complaint nor any written statement or complaint in compliance with the first element was ever filed with or received by any of the enumerated city officials, essential for compliance with the second element, within the statutory time period. In the case of *Daniel v. City of*Richmond, 199 Va. 490 (1957), our Supreme Court held that an "oral report did not sufficiently comply with the notice requirement and that actual *knowledge*by the city of the details of the accident could not be substituted for the notice required."

Here the oral conversations with the City Manager could not be substituted for the notice required nor would delivery of the complaint to the office of the attorney for the Commonwealth, whose function is separated and apart from that of the City Attorney and/or the other enumerated city officials.

The motion for summary judgment should be denied.
Exhibit 31.1

I, Kenneth T. Myers, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-Q of the registrant, Digital Lightwave, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2007



By:

/s/ KENNETH T. MYERSKenneth T. MyersPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10.7


 


VK Consulting, Inc. 


255 West 85th Street, PH1


New York, NY 10024


 


____________, 2018


Trident Acquisitions Corp.


77 Water Street, Fl 8


New York, NY 10005


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter
will confirm our agreement that commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration
statement (the “Registration Statement”) relating to the initial public offering of the securities of Trident
Acquisitions Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the consummation by the Company of an
acquisition transaction or the distribution of the trust account to the Company’s then public shareholders (as
described in the Registration Statement), VK Consulting, Inc. (the “Firm”) shall make available to the Company
certain general and administrative services, including the use of office space, utilities and secretarial support, as may be
required by the Company from time to time, at [___________________] (or any successor location). In exchange therefor, the
Company shall pay the Firm at the rate of $7,500 per month. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Company’s audit
committee determines that the Company lacks sufficient funds outside of the trust account to pay its actual or anticipated
expenses, all payments hereunder other than the amount required to be paid by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer
(which shall not be in excess of $3,000 per month) shall be deferred until the consummation of an acquisition transaction.


 






	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	VK CONSULTING, INC.




 


	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	 
	 	Title:	 


 





	
        Agreed to and Accepted as of the date first 

        written above by:
	 
	 	 
	TRIDENT ACQUISITIONS CORP.	 




 


	By:	 	 






	Name:	 	 
	Title:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shea Holebrook, Appellant.

[863 NYS2d 927]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cohen, J.), rendered July 3, 2007, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), criminal sale of a controlled substance at or near school grounds (two counts), and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Rivera, J.R, Florio, Angiolillo, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S SEPTEMBER 30,
2000,  QUARTERLY  REPORT ON FORM  10-QSB AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>         0001016060
<NAME>       Cyber Soccer, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                        56
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              56
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                56
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1,713
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      2,042
<OTHER-SE>                                    (3,699)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  56
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              0
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              893
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (893)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (893)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (893)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.00)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Jonah Shacknai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial conditions and results of
operations of the Company for the periods presented. /s/ JONAH SHACKNAI

Jonah Shacknai
Chief Executive Officer
September 10, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Medicis Pharmaceutical
Corporation and will be retained by Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

#### Laura E. Murphy v. Bryce Resort et al.

August 7, 1986

Case No. (Law) 10313

By JUDGE ALFRED D. SWERSKY

The matter is before the Court on the demurrers of the Defendants to Count II of the Motion for Judgment. This count alleges the existence of an implied warranty of safety for the Sky Bryce Airport and the breach of that warranty by the Defendants in that the airport is alleged to be "unreasonably dangerous for public use.” For reasons stated in this opinion, the demurrers must be sustained.

Plaintiff relies heavily, as authority for her proposition that such an implied warranty exists in Virginia law, on *Obenshain*v. Halliday, 504 F. Supp. 946 (E.D. Va. 1980). This case is neither controlling nor persuasive to this Court on the issue of existence of the alleged implied warranty. The court in *Obenshain*assumed without comment and without the recitation of any authority that Virginia law recognizes such an implied warranty.

While it is true that the law of implied warranty in Virginia is not limited to cases involving the sale of goods, see, e.g., *Mann*v. *Clowser,*190 Va. 887, 59 S.E.2d 78 (1950), no case cited by plaintiff nor found by the court could justify the extension of the warranty doctrine to the safety of an airport as alleged in Count II of the Motion for Judgment.

In view of the Supreme Court of Virginia*s expressed reluctance to extend the warranty doctrine by court action rather than legislative action as expressed in *Bruce*
      *206
      *Farms, Inc. v.*Coupe, 219 Va. 287, 247 S.E.2d 400 (1978), this Court will not so extend this doctrine. The Court therefore concludes that no implied warranty of safety exists under Virginia law and the demurrers to Count n of the Motion for Judgment should be sustained.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00489-CR

REMUS LITOIU

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On appeal from the

36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

Trial Cause No. S-13-3012-CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 30, 2015.
UNITED STATES

Appellee



### v.

Joshua K. SNELL Corporal (E

- 4)

U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant NMCCA NO. 2021001 32

Panel 1

ORDER

Granting Appellant’s Motion
to Withdraw Case from
Appellate Review

Upon consideration of A ppel lant ’ s Motion to Withdraw Case from Appellate Review, filed on 14 October 2021 , we have determined that A ppellant ’ srequest was properly executed and submitted, and is in substantial compliance with Article 61, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 861, and

Rule for Courts

- Martial 111 5

. Accordingly, it is, by the Court, this 18 th day of October 202 1

,

ORDERED:

(1) That A ppellant ’ s Motion to Withdraw Appellate Review is GRANTED

. ( 2 ) That the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General for
appropriate disposition.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court

Copy to:
45 ( LCDR Stoebner )

46

02
EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
BioSource International, Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
33-91838)  on Form S-8 of  BioSource  International,  Inc.  of our report  dated
February 9, 2004, with respect to the  consolidated  balance sheets of BioSource
International,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the
related consolidated  statements of income,  stockholders' equity and cash flows
for each of the years in the  three-year  period ended  December  31, 2003,  and
related financial statement  schedule,  which report appears in the December 31,
2003,  annual  report on Form 10-K of BioSource  International,  Inc. Our report
refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards ("SFAS")
No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets."



KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 25, 2004