alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(218) 

APPENDIX NO. 3 

SCHEDULE C POSITIONS 

Schedule C positions are excepted from the competitive service because of their confidential or 

policy-determining character. Most such positions are at grade 15 of the General Schedule or lower. 

Schedule C positions above the GS-15 level are either in the Senior Level (SL) personnel system 

or are specifically authorized in law. 

The decision concerning whether to place a position in Schedule C is made by the Director, U.S. 

Office of Personnel Management, upon agency request. Such requests are considered on a case-bycase basis. In addition to consideration of the justification submitted by the agency, OPM may conduct 

an independent review and analysis. In addition to the Schedule C positions authorized by the OPM 

Director, a limited number of positions may be placed under Schedule C by Executive Order of the 

President or by legislation. 

Requests for Schedule C exception are appropriate when: 

(1) The position involves making or approving substantive policy recommendations; or 

(2) The work of the position can be performed successfully only by someone with a thorough 

knowledge of and sympathy with the goals, priorities, and preferences of an official who has a 

confidential or policy determining relationship with the President or the agency head. There are 

special requirements for the types of superiors who are eligible for Schedule C secretaries. 

The immediate supervisor of a Schedule C position must be a Presidential appointee, a Senior 

Executive Service appointee (career or noncareer) occupying a General position, or a Schedule C appointee. The immediate supervisor may not occupy a position in the competitive service or a Career 

Reserved position in the Senior Executive Service. 

The only time when OPM approval is not required for a Schedule C position is when a position 

is filled by a temporary Schedule C appointment during a Presidential transition, a change of agency 

head, or establishment of a new agency. Temporary Schedule C positions may be established for 120 

days, with one extension of 120 days, under conditions prescribed by OPM. There is a limit on the 

number of such positions that can be established by an agency. New appointments may be made 

only during the 1-year period beginning on the date of the agency head’s appointment, a new Administration or establishment of a new agency. 

By law, the agency head must certify to OPM that both Schedule C and temporary Schedule 

C positions are not being requested for the sole purpose of detailing the incumbent to the White 

House. 

Agencies may fill Schedule C positions noncompetitively. Because of the confidential or policydetermining nature of Schedule C positions, the incumbents serve at the pleasure of the appointing 

authority (usually the agency head) and may be removed at any time. They are not covered under 

conduct-based or performance-removal procedures that apply to certain other excepted Service appointees. 

Schedule C positions authorized by OPM are automatically revoked when the incumbent leaves 

the position (i.e., there is no such thing as a ‘‘vacant’’ Schedule C position).
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned officer of Varco International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)  the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 4, 2004



/S/    JOHN F.
LAULETTAJohn F. Lauletta Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference
into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Digital Lightwave, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I James Green, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Patricia Hayes, Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 Dated: November 17, 2003
By:/s/ James GreenJames GreenChief Executive Officer and PresidentDated: November 17, 2003
By:/s/ Patricia HayesPatricia HayesChief Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER         |
|---------------------------------|
|                            |
| /s/ Steven White                |
| Steven White                    |
|                            |
| October 18, 2011                |
|                            |
| INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
|                            |
| /s/ Steven White                |
| Steven White                    |
|                            |
| October 18, 2011                |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000860235
<NAME> TEAM AMERICA CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,010,630
<SECURITIES>                                   250,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,321,378
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,905,068
<PP&E>                                       2,714,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                 906,144
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,540,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,850,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    28,404,509
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,772,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,540,103
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           339,958,006
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              323,190,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,998,742
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,903,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,221,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            682,042
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   682,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3319 

To allow the Pascua Yaqui Tribe to determine the requirements for 

membership in that tribe. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2011 

Mr. GRIJALVA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To allow the Pascua Yaqui Tribe to determine the 

requirements for membership in that tribe. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERSHIP DETER4 MINED BY TRIBE. 

5 Section 3 of Public Law 95–375 (25 U.S.C. 1300f– 

6 2) is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 3. For the purposes of section 1 of this Act, 

8 membership of the Pascua Yaqui Tribe shall consist of any 

9 person of Pascua Yaqui blood enrolled by the tribe.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CIRCUIT COURT OF CRAIG COUNTY

#### James Thomas Brewbaker v. Noel Huffman et ux.

October 26, 1984

By JUDGE DUNCAN M. BYRD, JR.

In this custody dispute between a parent and non-parent, most of the material facts, with the exception of facts relative to the "quality of custodial care" which would be provided by the respective parties, are not in major dispute.

The Court is of the opinion that the applicable rule of law is "that in custody . . . cases the welfare of the child is of paramount concern and takes precedence over the rights of parents. . . . There is however, a condition to the rule .... The condition is that the rights of parents may not be lightly severed but are to. be respected if at all consonant with the best interests of the child." *Rocka, etc.*v. *Roanoke County Department of Public*Welfare, 215 Va. 515 at 517 (1975). "The burden is upon the one seeking to sever the parents right to show . . . relinquishment or unfitness by clear, cogent and convincing proof." *Walker*v. *Brooks,*203 Va. 417 at 421 (1962), "or special facts and circumstances . . . constituting an extraordinary reason for taking a child away from its parents." *Wilkerson*v. *Wilkerson,*214 Va. 395 (1973).

When the facts in this case and the facts in *Walker*v. *Brooks, supra,*and *Wilkerson*v. *Wilkerson, supra,*are compared and applied to this "rule of law", it is clear that the Defendants have failed to meet this burden. There is no evidence of unfitness on the part of the Plaintiff and the evidence of relinquishment or other special facts and circumstances falls *247short of those in *Walker, supra,*and *Wilkerson, supra.*This rule will certainly appear unfair from the Defendants’ viewpoint since their evidence clearly shows them to be devoted, fit and proper substitute parents. However, the rule of law appears to be well established and properly so. The factual case can be fairly summed up by paraphrasing Mrs. Huffman’s summary of Mr. Brew-baker’s reasons given her for wanting Richard back. "He (Plaintiff Brewbaker) found no fault with the way I (Defendant Huffman) was keeping Richard but he said he wanted him back because he was his."

The Plaintiff is entitled to the custody of his son. Mr. Strickland is directed to prepare an order consistent with this opinion and with the proviso that the parties are encouraged to perfect the transfer of custody so as to cause the least impact to Richard Brewbaker, the subject of this dispute.
No. 93-412 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1993

STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Respondent,

APPEAL FROM: DistrictCourt of theThirteenthJudicial District, In and for the County of Yellowstone, The Honorable William J. Speare, Judge presiding.

COUNSEL OF RECORD: For Appellant: Rudy Stanko, Pro se, Laurel For Respondent: Hon. Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General, Helena Dennis Paxinos, CountyAttorney; John Kennedy, Deputy County Attorney, Billings

Filed: Submitted on Briefs: November 18, 1993 Decided: December 6, 1993Chief Justice J. A. Turnage delivered the Opinion of the Court. The Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, dismissed defendantRudy Stanko's (Stanko's) appeal from

### aJustice Court proceeding on the grounds that the appeal was premature and the District Court was therefore without jurisdiction. Stanko appeals. We affirm. The issue is whether a person alleged to have committed a misdemeanor may appeal froma justice courtproceeding prior tothe justice court's final adjudication. Stanko was charged with acting as an agent for a livestock dealer without a license,amisdemeanor inviolationof 5 81-8-271, MCA. Yellowstone County officials servedhimwith a complaint and arraigned him on that offense. Following the Justice Court's denial of Stanko'smotion todismiss the charge, Stanko appealed to the District Court. The District Court ordered the appeal dismissed and returned the case to the Justice Court. Stanko appeals from the District Court's order.

May a person alleged to have committed a misdemeanor appeal from a justice courtproceeding prior to the justice court's final adjudication? The right to appeal from justice court is purely statutory. State v. Barker (Mont. 1993), 858 P.2d 360, 363, 50 St.Rep. 970, 972. Section 46-17-311(2), MCA, clearly states that a person may 2appeal a justice court decision after a final judgment has been entered. See also 5 46-20-104,MCA (judgment must be final before appeal). A judgment isdefined as "anadjudicationby a court that the defendant is guilty or not guilty, and if the adjudication is that the defendant is guilty, it includes the sentence pronounced by the court.It Section 46-1-202(10), MCA. District courts are without jurisdictiontohear an appeal of
a justice court decision until after a final judgment has been enteredby the justice court. Statev. Todd (1993), 

## -P.2d 

## -, 50 St.Rep. 1466; State v. Hegeman (1991), 248 Mont. 49, 808 P.2d 509. Appeals taken prior to final adjudication and sentence in justice court are premature; properly, the district court must dismiss the appeal and remand the case back to justice court. State v. Wilson (1992), 252 Mont. 264, 827 P.2d 1286. We therefore conclude that the District Court did not err in denying Stankols appeal from justice court. Affirmed. Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(C), Montana Supreme Court 1988 InternalOperating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as precedent and shallbe publishedby its filingas apublic document with the Clerk of this Court and by a report of its result to the West Publishing Company.



### "/chief Justice 

# <We 

### concur: /
**Exhibit
      32.2**




WRITTEN
      STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




The
      undersigned, Roy Swan, is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer of Carver Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”).




This
      statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of
      the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006
      (the “Report”).




By
      execution of this statement, I certify that:




a)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
                78o(d)); and




b)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
                Report.


February 20,
                2007
              /s/ Roy SwanDated
              Roy
                Swan




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.




E-5
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Sun Reporter, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2000 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Richard H. Tanenbaum
                                 ------------------------
                                 Richard H. Tanenbaum
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
April 3, 2007
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALBERTICO VALENZUELA

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 22

- 00 19 7

- C R

Appeal from the

161 st District Court

of E ctor County, Texas

(TC# B

- 19

- 030 2

- CR )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter ’s second motion for extension of time within

which to file the record until January 19 , 202 3

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Joel P. Rodriguez

, the Court Reporter of the 161 st District

Court , prepare the reporter’s record and forward the same t o this Court on or before January 19

,

202 3

.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 10 th day of January , 202 3

.

PER CURIAM

B efore Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto , JJ.
Exhibit 4.19


 


 



	


	
Mazor Robotics Inc.

 189 S. Orange Ave.,


Suite 1850


Orlando, FL  32801


Tel: 1 (800) 80-MAZOR


Fax: (407) 591-3560


usa@mazorrobotics-us.com

	
Mazor Robotics Ltd.

5 Shacham St.

 North Industrial Park


Caesarea 3088900


Israel

Tel: +972 4 618-7100

 Fax: +972 4 618-7111


info@mazorrobotics.com





 




Amendment to Mazor Robotics Ltd. 2011 Share Option and Equity Incentive Plan ("the 2011 Plan")




 


According to the Board of Directors resolution dated February 12, 2018, Section 5.1 of the 2011 Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


"Awards may be granted under the Plan, subject to the provisions of Section 16.1 of the Plan, for up to an aggregate of 11,762,529 Shares. The Awards may be granted at any time, during a period of ten (10) years beginning on the Adoption Date.”




Except as hereinabove amended, the provisions of the 2011 Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


	
/s/ Jonathan Adereth


	
Jonathan Adereth,


	
Chairman of the Board of Directors
EXHIBIT 11

Computation of  Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      For the Years December 31,
                                                         1996           1995
                                                    -----------------------------
<S> <C>
Number of shares of common stock
   outstanding (weighted average)                       668,619        668,619
Shares issued in stock offering (weighted average)      234,792              -
Shares held in ESOP trust (weighted average)             45,975         51,693
Weighted average number of shares
   outstanding during the period                        857,436        616,926
Fully diluted weighted average
   number of shares outstanding during the period       857,436        616,926

Income  for the period                               $1,061,824       $567,598

Income  per share:
   Primary                                                $1.23          $0.92

   Fully Diluted                                          $1.23          $0.92
</TABLE>

                                       59
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |   | /s/      Paul K. Wotton                                           |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   | Dr.      Paul K. WottonPresident      and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   |   |                                                              |

----