alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3127 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3127

 To prohibit the payment of death gratuities to the surviving heirs of 
                     deceased Members of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2011

Mr. Posey (for himself, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Olson, Mr. Paul, Mr. Austin Scott 
  of Georgia, Mr. Flores, and Mr. Mulvaney) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the payment of death gratuities to the surviving heirs of 
                     deceased Members of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING PAYMENT OF GRATUITIES TO SURVIVORS OF MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS.

    (a) Prohibition.--No payment may be made from the applicable 
accounts of the House of Representatives, the contingent fund of the 
Senate, or any other appropriated funds for a death gratuity payment to 
the widow, widower, or heirs-at-law of any Member of Congress who dies 
after the commencement of the Congress to which the Member has been 
elected.
    (b) No Effect on Other Payments to Survivors.--Nothing in 
subsection (a) shall be construed to prohibit or affect the payment to 
any individual of any unpaid balance or salary or other sums due to a 
Member of Congress who dies after the commencement of the Congress to 
which the Member has been elected.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, a ``Member of Congress'' means a Senator 
or a Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the 
Congress.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                   Computation of Earnings Per Common Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Pro Forma
                                                           Three Months       Three Months
                                                           Ended 3/31/96     Ended 3/31/97
                                                           -------------     --------------
<S>                                                      <C>                <C>       
      Weighted average common shares outstanding:
      Average shares outstanding during the period (1)       11,364,394         11,364,395
      Options issued in place of Phantom Membership Plan      1,007,362            950,989
      Cheap stock options (2)                                   366,188            240,335
      Common shares issuable to MCI in conversion (3)         2,841,099          2,841,099
      Common shares issued in the offering                         --            3,162,500
                                                             ----------         ----------

      Total weighted average common shares                   15,579,043         18,559,318
                                                             ==========         ==========

      Pro forma net income/Net income applicable to
      common shares:
      Pro forma net income/Net incomes                       $1,912,000           $390,000
      Increase in earnings, net of taxes, resulting
      from the MCI Conversion (3)                               203,000            510,000
                                                             ----------         ----------

      Pro forma net income/Net income applicable 
        to common shares                                     $2,115,000           $900,000
                                                             ==========           ========

      Pro forma net income/Net income per Common Share            $0.14              $0.05
                                                                  =====              =====
</TABLE>

(1)  After considering the Merger in conjunction with the Company's initial
     public offering.

(2)  Pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 4:D, stock options granted and
     stock issued within one year of the initial public offering have been
     included in the calculation of weighted average common shares outstanding
     using the treasury stock method based on an assumed initial public offering
     price of $16.00 and have been treated as outstanding for all reported
     periods.

(3)  Assumes such transactions occurred on January 1, 1996.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 19-60032 Summary Calendar

Maria Sebastiana Paiz Sorto; Darlyn Margarita Argueta Paiz,

Petitioners ,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General ,
Respondent

.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A209 294 337 Agency No. A209 294 338

Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: *

Maria Sebastiana Paiz Sorto and her minor daughter, Darlyn Margarita Argueta Paiz, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s decision affirming, without opinion, an order of the Immigration

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 18, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-60032 Document: 00516397723 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/18/2022No. 19-60032

2 Judge (IJ) denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Agains t Torture (CAT). To the extent the petitioners challenge the BIA’s use of the summary affirmance procedure provided by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(4), we lack jurisdiction to consider the
unexhausted claim. See Martinez-Guevara v. Garland , 27 F.4th 353, 359-61 & n.9 (5th Cir. 2022). Given the BIA’ s summary affirmance disposition, we review the IJ’s factual findin gs for substantial evidence. See Zhang v.
Gonzales , 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005); Soadjede v. Ashcroft , 324 F.3d 830, 831-32 (5th Cir. 2003).

Substantial evidence su pports the IJ’s conclusion that the MS-13 gang’s threats were motivated by a de sire to increase the wealth of the organization by extorting family-owned business like the petitioners’ and, as such, their membership in the proposed family-based particular social group was incidental, tangential, or subordinate to those motives. See , e.g. , RamirezMejia v. Lynch , 794 F.3d 485, 493 (5th Cir. 2015); Thuri v. Ashcroft , 380 F.3d 788, 792-93 (5th Cir. 2004); Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft , 303 F.3d 341, 350 (5th Cir. 2002). Because the nexus issue is dispositive of the petitioners’ asylum and withholding of removal claims, see Zhang , 432 F.3d at 344; Vazquez-Guerra v. Garland , 7 F.4th 265, 270-71 (5th Cir. 2021), cert. denied , 142 S. Ct. 1228 (2022), this court need not reach their arguments related to persecution and whether the government of El Salvador was able and willing to control their persecutors. See INS v. Bagamasbad , 429 U.S. 24, 25 (1976).
Regarding their CAT claim, the pe titioners have failed to produce evidence that would compel a conclusion that the government of El Salvador would acquiesce in their torture. See Chen v. Gonzales , 470 F.3d 1131, 1138- 39 (5th Cir. 2006); see also Martinez Manzanares v. Barr , 925 F.3d 222, 229 (5th Cir. 2019); Tamara-Gomez v. Gonzales , 447 F.3d 343, 351 (5th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED IN PART and
DISMISSED IN PART for lack of jurisdiction. Case: 19-60032 Document: 00516397723 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/18/2022
GUARANTY OF LEASE

         For value received, the fact and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, and in consideration of the leasing of, and as an inducement to
H.C.B. CORPORATION (hereinafter referred to as the "Lessor"), to enter into an
Equipment Lease with PIZZERIA REGINA OF FLORIDA, INC. (the "Lessee") of even
date (the "Lease"), the undersigned jointly and severally (the "Guarantor")
guarantees unto Lessor, and its successors and assigns, the punctual payment by
Lessee of all rents and other payments as and when due and payable under the
Lease and any extension or renewal thereof, and the full, faithful and punctual
performance by Lessee of all the covenants, agreements and provisions contained
in the Lease on the part of Lessee to be done, performed and observed during the
term of the Lease and any extension or renewal thereof.

         No consent by Lessor to any assignment of the Lease or any subletting
by Lessee under the Lease, and no acceptance by Lessor of any one or more
checks, notes, bills, other commercial paper or other property on account or in
payment of, or as security for, any lease payment or other payment to be paid by
Lessee in connection with any settlement or compromise made by Lessor with
Lessee with respect to any such payment, and no other allowance or indulgence
granted or permitted by Lessor shall in any way affect the liabilities of any
Guarantor hereunder, nor in any way release the Guarantor from any obligations
under the terms of this Guaranty.

         Guarantor hereby waives demand, notice of default or of non-payment,
every other notice and all suretyship defenses, and agrees to pay to Lessor any
and all costs and expenses, including court costs and reasonable attorney's
fees, incurred by Lessor in the enforcement of this Guaranty.

         It is specifically understood by Guarantor that, insofar as the context
herein so requires or admits, the term "Lessor" shall include Lessor's
successors and assigns, and the term "Lessee" shall include Lessee's successors
and assigns.

         Executed as a sealed instrument this 17th day of March, 1998.

WITNESS:                                     BOSTON RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                             By ________________________________
                                                George R. Chapdelaine,
                                                President and Treasurer


                                                ________________________________
                                                GEORGE R. CHAPDELAINE,
                                                Individually

                                                ________________________________
                                                JOHN P. POLCARI, Individually
Exhibit 31.2

I, Kenneth T. Myers, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-Q of the registrant, Digital Lightwave, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2008



By:

/s/ KENNETH T. MYERSKenneth T. MyersChief Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3246 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3246

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 15455 Manchester Road in Ballwin, Missouri, as the ``Specialist 
                Peter J. Navarro Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST PETER J. NAVARRO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 15455 Manchester Road in Ballwin, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Specialist Peter J. Navarro Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Peter J. Navarro Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 13, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3246

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 15455 Manchester Road in Ballwin, Missouri, as the ``Specialist 
                Peter J. Navarro Post Office Building''.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             827
<SECURITIES>                                     1,541
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,776
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,127
<PP&E>                                           4,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,316
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,160
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,112
<SALES>                                          9,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,169
<CGS>                                              480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (63)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (36)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    173
<INCOME-TAX>                                       170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  3
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 16, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50014

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANNY RAY BISHOP,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-03-CR-105-1

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Danny Ray Bishop appeals the sentence imposed following his

jury-trial conviction for manufacturing methamphetamine and for

possession of pseudoephedrine with intent to manufacture

methamphetamine. He argues that the district court clearly erred

by considering empty pseudoephedrine packets in calculating the

drug quantity attributable to him under the Sentencing

Guidelines. The Presentence Report (“PSR”) relied on information

that was derived from police reports and later corroborated by
No. 04-50014

-2-

testimony at the sentencing hearing as to the quantity of empty

packaging and as to the likelihood that the contents were used to

manufacture methamphetamine. Because Bishop has not shown that

the drug-quantity information in the PSR “is materially untrue,

inaccurate, or unreliable,” he has not shown that the district

court clearly erred by adopting it. See United States v. Ayala,

47 F.3d 688, 690 (5th Cir. 1995). The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.1

INDUSTRI-MATEMATIK INTERNATIONAL CORP.
901 Market Street , Suite 475
Wilmington, Delaware 19801

March 22, 2001
Mr. Stig Durlow
Arkivg. 7
SE-411-34 Gothenberg, Sweden

Dear Stig:
On April 3, 1997, you and Industri-Matematik International Corp.
("IMIC") entered into an amended and restated Employment Agreement effective
as of May 1, 1996 ("Employment Agreement").  [All capitalized terms not
defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment
Agreement.]
The purpose of this letter is to set forth agreed changes in our
respective obligations in the event of a Change of Control Event.  We have
agreed as follows:
1.A.	Section 3.1.b of the Agreement is amended to read as
follows:
		"If IMIC terminates your employment under
this Employment Agreement without Cause (as defined in
Section 3.4.b) within 60 days prior to a Change of Control
Event (as defined in Section 3.1.c) or if IMIC or you
terminate your employment as a result of a Change of
Control Event, IMIC shall (i) pay to you in one lump sum
within 30 days of the date of termination, an amount equal
to three times the sum of (x) your Base Compensation at the
date the Change of Control Event occurred and (y) the
maximum Incentive Compensation you could earn in the Fiscal
Year in which the Change of Control Event occurred and (b)
continue to fund your pension in accordance with the terms
of the letter agreement dated April 3, 1997, between you
and IMIC for the one year period following the date of
termination."
1.B.	Section 3.2.b.2 of the Agreement shall be deleted.
2.	Except as set forth in this letter, the Employment Agreement
shall remain unchanged.
If the forgoing correctly sets forth our agreement please sign and
return the enclosed copy of this letter.
Very truly yours,

INDUSTRI-MATEMATIK INTERNATIONAL CORP.

By: /s/ Marvin S. Robinson
----------------------------------
Marvin S. Robinson, Secretary
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
/s/ Stig Durlow
--------------------
Stig Durlow
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000879815     
<NAME>                             GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PTSP III-G
                                    
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                   169,558
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            170,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         339,728
<PP&E>                                 9,953,861
<DEPRECIATION>                         8,526,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,817,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    134,150
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,572,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,817,470
<SALES>                                1,272,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1,303,005
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          1,598,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (295,656)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (295,656)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                           (295,656)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (2.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
 


</TABLE>