46088 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 3, 2017 / Notices 

comment period soliciting comments, of 

the following collection of information 

on July 6, 2017, 82 FR 31341. TSA 

developed and implemented a plan to 

review the security plans and inspect 

critical pipeline systems to comply with 

a requirement in the Implementing 

Recommendations of the 9/11 

Commission Act of 2007 (9/11 Act). 

DATES: Send your comments by 

November 2, 2017. A comment to OMB 

is most effective if OMB receives it 

within 30 days of publication. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written comments on 

the proposed information collection to 

the Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, OMB. Comments should be 

addressed to Desk Officer, Department 

of Homeland Security/TSA, and sent via 

electronic mail to dhsdeskofficer@

omb.eop.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christina A. Walsh, TSA PRA Officer, 

Office of Information Technology (OIT), 

TSA–11, Transportation Security 

Administration, 601 South 12th Street, 

Arlington, VA 20598–6011; telephone 

(571) 227–2062; email TSAPRA@

tsa.dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.), an agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a valid OMB control 

number. The ICR documentation will be 

made available at http://

www.reginfo.gov upon its submission to 

OMB. Therefore, in preparation for 

OMB review and approval of the 

following information collection, TSA is 

soliciting comments to— 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

information requirement is necessary for 

the proper performance of the functions 

of the agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including using 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Consistent with the requirements of 

Executive Order (EO) 13771, Reducing 

Regulation and Controlling Regulatory 

Costs, and EO 13777, Enforcing the 

Regulatory Reform Agenda, TSA is also 

requesting comments on the extent to 

which this request for information could 

be modified to reduce the burden on 

respondents. 

Information Collection Requirement 

Title: Critical Facility Information of 

the Top 100 Most Critical Pipelines. 

Type of Request: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

OMB Control Number: 1652–0050. 

Forms(s): Critical Facility Security 

Review. 

Affected Public: Pipeline companies. 

Abstract: The 9/11 Act specifically 

tasked TSA to develop and implement 

a plan for reviewing the pipeline 

security plans and inspecting critical 

facilities of the 100 most critical 

pipeline systems. See sec. 1557 of the 9/ 

11 Act (Pub. L. 110–53; 121 Stat. 266, 

475, Aug. 3, 2007; codified at 6 U.S.C. 

1207(b)). TSA visits critical pipeline 

facilities and collects site-specific 

information from pipeline operators on 

facility security policies, procedures, 

and physical security measures. TSA 

uses the information to determine 

strengths and weaknesses at the nation’s 

critical pipeline facilities, areas to target 

for risk reduction strategies, pipeline 

industry implementation of the TSA 

Pipeline Security Guidelines, and 

operator implementation of 

recommendations made during TSA 

critical facility visits. 

Number of Respondents: 160. 

Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An 

estimated 720 hours annually. 

Dated: September 28, 2017. 

Christina A. Walsh, 

TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office 

of Information Technology. 

[FR Doc. 2017–21251 Filed 10–2–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–05–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1072] 

Certain Wi-Fi Enabled Electronic 

Devices and Components Thereof; 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

August 29, 2017, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of Sharp Corporation of Japan 

and Sharp Electronics Corporation of 

Montvale, New Jersey. Supplements to 

the complaint were filed on August 30, 

2017 and September 21, 2017. The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain Wi-Fi enabled electronic devices 

and components thereof by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 8,325,838 (‘‘the ’838 patent’’) 

and U.S. Patent No. 8,279,809 (‘‘the ’809 

patent’’). The complaint further alleges 

that an industry in the United States 

exists as required by the applicable 

Federal Statute. 

The complainants request that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337 and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

September 26, 2017, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 3, 2017 / Notices 46089 

importation of certain Wi-Fi enabled 

electronic devices and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of one 

or more of claims 1–18 of the ’838 

patent and claims 1–4, 6–9, 11–14, and 

16 of the ’809 patent; and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the 

presiding administrative law judge shall 

take evidence or other information and 

hear arguments from the parties and 

other interested persons with respect to 

the public interest in this investigation, 

as appropriate, and provide the 

Commission with findings of fact and a 

recommended determination on this 

issue, which shall be limited to the 

statutory public interest factors set forth 

in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are: 

Sharp Corporation, 1 Takumi-cho, 

Sakai-ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 590–8522 

Japan 

Sharp Electronics Corporation, 100 

Paragon Drive, Montvale, NJ 07645 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Hisense Co., Ltd., Hisense Tower, 17 

Donghaixi Road, Qingdao, China 

266071 

Hisense Electric, Co. Ltd., No. 218 

Qianwangang Road, QingDao 

Economic & Technological Zone, 

QingDao China 266555 

Hisense International (Hong Kong) Co. 

Ltd., Room 3104–06, Singga 

Commerical Centre, No. 148 

Connaught Road West, Hong Kong 

Hisense USA Corporation, 7130 

McGinnis Ferry Road, Suwanee, GA 

30024 

Hisense Electronics Manufacturing 

Company of America Corporation, 

7310 McGinnis Ferry Road, Suwanee, 

GA 30024 

Hisense USA Multimedia R&D Center, 

Inc., 7310 McGinnis Ferry Road, 

Suwanee, GA 30024 

Hisense Inc., 16541 Gothard Street, 

Suite 108, Huntington Beach, CA 

92647 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 27, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–21157 Filed 10–2–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE 

UNITED STATES 

Hearings of the Judicial Conference 

Advisory Committee on the Federal 

Rules of Criminal Procedure 

AGENCY: Advisory Committee on the 

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 

Judicial Conference of the United States. 

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of public 

hearing. 

SUMMARY: The following public hearing 

on proposed amendments to the Federal 

Rules of Criminal Procedure has been 

canceled: Criminal Rules Hearing on 

October 24, 2017, in Chicago, Illinois. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Rules 

Committee Secretary, Rules Committee 

Staff, Administrative Office of the 

United States Courts, Washington, DC 

20544, telephone (202) 502–1820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Announcement for this hearing was 

previously published in 82 FR 37610. 

Dated: September 27, 2017. 

Rebecca A. Womeldorf, 

Rules Committee Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2017–21030 Filed 10–2–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 2210–55–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Meeting of the NDCAC Executive 

Advisory Board 

AGENCY: Justice Department. 

ACTION: Meeting notice. 

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is 

to announce the meeting of the 

Department of Justice’s National 

Domestic Communications Assistance 

Center’s (NDCAC) Executive Advisory 

Board (EAB). The meeting is being 

called to address the items identified in 

the Agenda detailed below. The NDCAC 

EAB is a federal advisory committee 

established pursuant to the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (FACA). 

DATES: The NDCAC EAB meeting is 

open to the public, subject to the 

registration requirements detailed 

below. The EAB will meet in open 

session from 9:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m. 

on November 1, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place 

at 5000 Seminary Rd, Alexandria, VA 

22311. Entry into the meeting room will 

begin at 8:00 a.m. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Inquiries may be addressed to Ms. Alice 

Bardney-Boose, Designated Federal 

Officer, National Domestic 

Communications Assistance Center, 

Department of Justice, by email at 

NDCAC@ic.fbi.gov or by phone at (540) 

361–4600. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda: 

The meeting will be called to order at 

9:00 a.m. by EAB Chairman Preston 

Grubbs. All EAB members will be 

introduced and EAB Chairman Grubbs 

will provide remarks. The EAB will 

receive an update presentation and hold 

a discussion on the National Domestic 

Communications Assistance Center; 

receive a status report from its 

Administrative sub-committee; review 

the EAB Charter; and discuss the 

process of filling the NDCAC Deputy 

Director position. Note: Agenda items 

are subject to change. 

The purpose of the EAB is to provide 

advice and recommendations to the 

Attorney General or designee, and to the 

Director of the NDCAC that promote 

public safety and national security by 

advancing the NDCAC’s core functions: 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES