alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 13

- 00724

- CR James Wesley ROORK , Appellant

v. The STATE of The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 38th Judicial District Court , Medina County, Texas Trial Court No. 13

- 09

- 11343

- CR Honorable Camile G. Dubose , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: December 18, 2013
DISMISSED
On November 4 , 2013, we notified the appellant that the trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Additionally, the clerk’s record contains a written waiver signed by t he appellant pursuant to which he entered a plea of guilty

. The trial court’s judgment also shows that there was a plea bargain agreement, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defenda nt. Therefore, the trial court’s04

- 13

- 00724

- CR certification accurately reflects that this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 25.2(a)(2).
In our November 4 , 2013 order, we warned the appellant that “[this] appeal must be dismissed if a certifica tion that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” See id. R . 25.2(d). We ordered that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless the appellant caused an amended trial court certification to be filed by December 4 , 2013 that showed the appellant has the right of appeal. See id. R. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 176 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2 003, no pet.). No response was filed. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

PER CURIAM Do not publish

- 2

-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                             501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                       549
<INVENTORY>                                     15,672
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,400
<PP&E>                                          23,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,403
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,741
<SALES>                                         37,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,007
<CGS>                                           14,728
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,728
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   149
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,020
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,606
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,414
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Timothy Jerome McCALL, Appellant.

No. 06-2993.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

April 25, 2008.

ORDER

Appellant’s petition for rehearing by the panel has been considered by the Court and is granted. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. The opinion and judgment of this Court filed on November 5, 2007 are vacated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET - UNAUDITED AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         38,155
<SECURITIES>                                   49,278
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,251
<PP&E>                                         12,842
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          26,403
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,908
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,499
<CGS>                                          20,687
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  96,913
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                25,070
<INCOME-TAX>                                   10,004
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   15,066
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.19


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 45842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20997]



[[Page 45842]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC17-144-000.
    Applicants: Noble Americas Gas & Power Corp., Mercuria Energy 
America, Inc.
    Description: Supplement to July 31, 2017 Joint Application for 
Authorization under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act by Mercuria 
Energy America, Inc.
    Filed Date: 9/22/17.
    Accession Number: 20170922-5179.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/27/17.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2336-002.
    Applicants: Shoreham Solar Commons LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Second Supplement to Market-Based 
Rate Application to be effective 11/22/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/22/17.
    Accession Number: 20170922-5165.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2337-002.
    Applicants: Shoreham Solar Commons Holdings LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Second Supplement to Market-Based 
Rate Application to be effective 11/22/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/22/17.
    Accession Number: 20170922-5166.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: September 25, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-20997 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1143

___________________________

James Eugene Wolf

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Hoene Ridge Subdivision; Kelly A. Kelly

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

___________________________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

 Submitted: August 1, 2016

Filed: October 14, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

James Eugene Wolf appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims

1

under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 844, and 1961 etseq.; and 42 U.S.C. §§ 3631and 12101

et seq. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. 

The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.
A careful review of the record reveals that Wolf is not entitled to relief for the

reasons stated by the district court. The motion to strike appellees’ brief is denied.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS<F1>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1996
<CASH>                                           3,557
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     35,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,400
<PP&E>                                          66,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 248,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,290
<BONDS>                                        140,514
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     35,000
<COMMON>                                         9,178
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   248,691
<SALES>                                        116,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,241
<CGS>                                           92,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,841
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,416
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,066
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,509
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,509
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The results of operations for the six months ended June 29, 1996 represent
the combined results of Clark-Schwebel Holdings, Inc. ("Company") for the
period of April 18, 1996 through June 29, 1996 (successor company) and the
results of Form Mill A, Inc. for the period of December 31, 1995 through April
17, 1996 (predecessor company). A change in ownership resulted from a leveraged
buyout on April 17, 1996, and the transaction resulted in a new basis of
accounting for the Company.  Therefore, the results of operations for the six
months ended June 29, 1996 are not fully comparable to preceding reporting
periods. 
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1996 and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          13,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  171,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               184,979
<PP&E>                                       4,562,827
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,096,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,651,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              168
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,651,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,651,202
<SALES>                                      1,520,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,523,632
<CGS>                                          833,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  833,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               227,861
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                461,830
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            461,830
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   461,830
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    36.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    36.84
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


I, G.  Richard  Smith,  Chairman of the Board of Directors  and Chief  Executive
Officer of  Coronado  Industries,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),  have  executed  this
certification  in connection  with the filing with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission  of the  Company's  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ G. Richard Smith
------------------------------------
G. Richard Smith
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
April 13, 2005
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KENNETH D. KLEIN
, Appellant,

v.

ALYSSABETH KLEIN, RUSSELL B. KLEIN TRAVIS KLEIN

and SYDRIA SCHAFFER
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 16

- 4238

[ November 22, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Janis Brustares Keyser , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502014CP

001098XXXXMB

.

Laura Bourne Burkhalter of Laura Bourne Burkhalter, P.A., Miami Shores, for appellant.

Ashley Crispin Ackal, Brian M. O'Connell, Joielle A. Foglietta and Clara C. Ciadella, of Ciklin Lubitz & O'Connell, West Palm Beach, for appellee s Alyssabeth Klein, Russell B. Klein and Travis Klein

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, M AY and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 8, 2020

a0505 

# Order

Clerk May 8, 2020

157986

BRONSON METHODIST HOSPITAL,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 157986

COA: 333275

Kalamazoo CC: 2015

- 000541

- AV

FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN and FARM

BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_______________________________________/

By order of October 2, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the March 27,

2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in W A

Foot Mem Hosp v Mich Assigned Claims Plan (Docket No. 156 622). On order of the

Court, the case having been decided on October 25, 2019, 504 Mich 985 (2019), the

application is again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the cases of Pearce v

Eaton Co Rd Comm (Docket No. 158069) and Brugger v Midland C o Bd of Rd Comm’rs

(Docket No. 158304) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in

those cases may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we

ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the d ecisions in those

cases.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of C&G DEC Capital, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard H. Tanenbaum, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Richard H. Tanenbaum
-----------------------------
Richard H. Tanenbaum
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

May 18, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2859 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2859

                      To repeal Public Law 107-40.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 7, 2011

    Ms. Lee of California (for herself, Mr. Jones, Mr. Conyers, Mr. 
    Grijalva, Mr. Honda, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. 
 McDermott, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Ms. Edwards, Mr. Stark, Mr. Filner, 
 and Ms. Waters) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                      To repeal Public Law 107-40.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Repeal of the Authorization for Use 
of Military Force''.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDING.

    Congress finds that the Authorization for Use of Military Force 
(Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), signed into law on September 
18, 2001, has been used to justify a broad and open-ended authorization 
for the use of military force and such an interpretation is 
inconsistent with the authority of Congress to declare war and make all 
laws for executing powers vested by the Constitution in the Government 
of the United States.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF PUBLIC LAW 107-40.

    Effective 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 
1541 note) is hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 11
                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                     AS OF QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                           SEPTEMBER 30, 1997         SEPTEMBER 30,1996
                                           ------------------         -----------------
<S>                                        <C>                        <C>
Net income / (Loss)                             329,416                    (783,693)

Weighted average shares outstanding           2,185,348                   2,167,135

Earning / (Loss) per shares outstanding            0.15                       (0.36)
</TABLE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                             SEPTEMBER 30, 1997        SEPTEMBER 30,1996
                                             ------------------        -----------------
<S>                                           <C>                      <C>
Net income / (Loss)                                639,541                   (520,209)

Weighted average shares outstanding              2,183,092                  2,164,879

Earning / (Loss) per shares outstanding               0.29                      (0.24)
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Form 10-K of Carrollton Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2003, I, Randall M. Robey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Carrollton Bancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)   such
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the
information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
conditions and results of operations of Carrollton Bancorp.

|/s/ Randall M. RobeyRandall M. Robey Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

64

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEROME DOLNEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 234 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.