alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3237 

To amend the SOAR Act by clarifying the scope of coverage of the Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 18, 2011 

Mr. GOWDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the SOAR Act by clarifying the scope of coverage 

of the Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SOAR Technical Cor5 rections Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF FUNDS. 

7 Section 3007(a)(4)(F) of the Scholarships for Oppor8 tunity and Results Act (Public Law 112–10; 125 Stat. 

9 203) is amended to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(F) ensures that participating students 

11 are taught by core subject matter teachers who 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3237 IH

1 have a baccalaureate degree or equivalent de2 gree, whether such degree was awarded in or 

3 outside of the United States.’’. 

4 SEC. 3. NATIONALLY NORM-REFERENCED STANDARDIZED 

5 TESTS. 

6 Section 3008(h) of the Scholarships for Opportunity 

7 and Results Act (Public Law 112–10; 125 Stat. 205) is 

8 amended by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and inserting 

9 the following: 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Institute of Education 

11 Sciences shall administer nationally norm-referenced 

12 standardized tests, as described in paragraph (3)(A) 

13 of section 3009(a), to students participating in the 

14 evaluation under section 3009(a) for the purpose of 

15 conducting the evaluation under such section, except 

16 where a student is attending a participating school 

17 that is administering the same nationally norm-ref18 erenced standardized test. 

19 ‘‘(2) TEST RESULTS.—Each participating 

20 school that administers the nationally norm-ref21 erenced standardized test described in paragraph (1) 

22 to an eligible student shall make the test results, 

23 with respect to such student, available to the Sec24 retary as necessary for evaluation under section 

25 3009(a).’’. 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3237 IH

1 SEC. 4. EVALUATIONS. 

2 Section 3009(a)(3) of the Scholarships for Oppor3 tunity and Results Act (Public Law 112–10; 125 Stat. 

4 206) is amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting before the 

6 semicolon the following: ‘‘in a manner consistent 

7 with section 3008(h)’’; and 

8 (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ‘‘, if re9 quested by the Institute of Education Sciences,’’ 

10 after ‘‘will participate’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
*Of the district of Maine, sitting by designation.

Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter

Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 03-1745

JOSE A. NUÑEZ-SANTIAGO, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PUERTO RICO ELECTRICAL POWER AUTHORITY, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellants,

v.

CARIBBEAN RESTAURANTS, ET AL.,

Cross-Defendants, Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Raymond L. Acosta, Senior U.S. District Judge]

Before

Selya and Howard, Circuit Judges,

and Singal,* District Judge. 

Evan Slavitt, with whom Bodoff & Slavitt LLP, David C.

Indiano, Alexander Bopp and Indiano & Williams, P.S.C. were on

brief, for appellants.

Amancio Arias Guardiola, with whom Arias Cestero & Arias

Guardiola was on brief, for appellees.

May 5, 2004
-2-

Per curiam. Jose Alberto Nuñez Gomez, then three years old,

was injured on March 21, 1999 when he placed his hand inside an

unlocked electrical box owned by Puerto Rico Electrical Power

Authority ("PREPA") and located near a Burger King restaurant

operated by Caribbean Restaurants. The child and his parents

sued the electric company and Caribbean Restaurants, together

with various other defendants, for negligence under Puerto Rico's

civil code. PREPA cross-claimed against Caribbean Restaurants. 

At trial, the district court granted Caribbean Restaurants'

motions for judgment as a matter of law against both the

plaintiffs and PREPA, ruling that there was insufficient evidence

upon which a jury could find that Caribbean Restaurants had

breached a duty of care. The jury found PREPA to have been

negligent and awarded damages. After the verdict but before

judgment was entered against it, PREPA settled with the

plaintiffs. Now PREPA appeals the judgments as a matter of law

in Caribbean Restaurants' favor, apparently seeking to force

Caribbean Restaurants to contribute to the settlement payments to

the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are not involved in this appeal. 

Orders granting motions for judgment as a matter of law are

reviewed de novo. Hochen v. Bobst Group, Inc., 290 F.3d 446, 453

(1st Cir. 2002). Like the district court, this court examines
-3-

the evidence and all fair inferences in the light most favorable

to the non-movant to determine whether the non-movant has offered

"more than a mere scintilla of evidence" warranting the

submission of the issue to the jury. Id. A district court's

order of judgment as a matter of law will be affirmed only if

"applying these standards, the evidence does not permit a

reasonable jury to find in favor of appellants." Id.

Having reviewed the record in the light of this standard of

review, this court is fully satisfied that the district court

acted appropriately in granting Caribbean Restaurants' motions

for judgment as a matter of law. The facts are well known to the

parties, and a fact-intensive written analysis would be of no

import to anyone other than them. The rulings below are

affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

We hereby consent to the use in this Form 10-K of our report dated January 
23, 1998, relating to the financial Statements of Community Bancorp, Inc. as 
of and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1997. We 
also consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the 
following Registration Statements.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
              Registration 
    Form      Statement No.        Purpose
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>          <C>              <C>
     S-8         33-44921     1987 Stock Option Plan
     S-8         33-48160     401(k) Retirement Plan
     S-8        333-52071     1996 Stock Option Plan and 401(k) Plan  
     S-3        333-37527     Registration of $150,000,000 of Common Stock, 
                              Preferred Stock and Debt Securities
     S-4        333-40071     Shelf registration of 4,438,207 shares of Common 
                              Stock
     S-4        333-49367     Shelf registration of 7,000,000 shares of Common 
                              Stock
</TABLE>


                         /s/ BAIRD, KURTZ & DOBSON


Denver, Colorado
March 22, 1999
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350,  chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of Digital Power  Corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby
certify with respect to the annual report of the Company on Form 10-QSB as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission that, to the best of her knowledge:

     (1) the annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information  contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Daniela C. Calvitti,
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             (Principal Accounting and Financial
                                             Officer)
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

#### Preshlock et al. v. Brenner et al.

May 16, 1984

Case No. (Chancery) 15003

By JUDGE ALBERT H. GRENADIER

The plaintiffs have filed a bill of complaint claiming an easement by prescription to the use of a driveway which is owned in fee by the defendant Brenner and in which the City of Alexandria has a storm sewer easement.

The defendant Brenner has demurred to the bill of complaint and alleges that the plaintiffs have failed to allege in their bill of complaint that the use of the driveway was with the knowledge and acquiescence of the defendant Brenner and that the plaintiffs cannot acquire a right by prescription because the driveway is affected with a public interest by virtue of the City’s storm sewer easement.

The Court is of the opinion that the plaintiffs cannot acquire an easement by prescription as a matter of law and that the demurrer should be sustained and the bill of complaint dismissed.

The great weight of authority supports the proposition that no prescriptive right can be acquired in property affected with a public interest or dedicated to a public use. *Lynchburg*v. C. *& O. Railway Co.,*170 Va. 108 (1938). Additional cases in support of this general rule may be found in 55 A.L.R.2d 612, § 34 (1957). It is clear that the land in question was dedicated to a public use, as a storm sewer easement constitutes a public use. *Burns*v. *Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County,*218 Va. 625 (1977).

*200It is true, as the plaintiffs note, that different rights-of-way over the same tract may be acquired for different purposes by prescription, but the case cited as authority for that proposition, *Hoyt*v. *Kennedy,*170 Mass. 54, 48 N.E. 1073 (1898), is premised upon facts quite different from those in this case. In *Hoyt*there was no public use or interest. The City’s easement and the easements claimed by the plaintiffs in this case are not mutually exclusive. The City’s easement is above and below the surface and fully encompasses the easement claimed by the plaintiffs.

Accordingly, as the property which is the subject of the plaintiffs’ claim is dedicated to a public use, the plaintiffs cannot acquire an easement by prescription over it.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-57610, No.
33-59050, No. 33-78094, No. 33-89828, No. 333-09383, and No. 333-29667) of
Trident Microsystems, Inc. of our report dated July 23, 1999, appearing on page
29 of this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California

September 24, 1999

                                       48
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3246 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 15455 Manchester Road in Ballwin, Missouri, 

as the ‘‘Specialist Peter J. Navarro Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3246 EH

1 SECTION 1. SPECIALIST PETER J. NAVARRO POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 15455 Manchester Road in 

5 Ballwin, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Specialist Peter J. Navarro Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Specialist Peter J. 

11 Navarro Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 13, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3246 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostNavarro Post Office Building’’. Ballwin, Missouri, as the ‘‘Specialist Peter J. al Service located at 15455 Manchester Road in
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         172,607
<SECURITIES>                                11,300,772
<RECEIVABLES>                                  955,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    736,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,101,530
<PP&E>                                       9,223,732
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,053,552)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,545,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,870,438
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       133,620
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,121,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,545,426
<SALES>                                      2,665,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,665,946
<CGS>                                          816,439
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  816,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,590,419
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (618,171)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (618,171)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (618,171)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

#### Commonwealth of Virginia v. Krbec

March 6, 1984

Case No. 9519

By JUDGE BERNARD G. BARROW

I have reviewed the memoranda and the authorities which you have forwarded to me in this matter. In my opinion the information contained in the sealed envelope forwarded to the Clerk from the Department of Taxation is not of "such importance that the ends of justice require that the secrecy and confidentiality" of the tax returns in the envelope be violated. Therefore, it should not be opened and should be returned to the Department of Taxation by the Clerk after the entry of the final order in this matter.

Virginia Code § 58-48.4 requires that there be a finding that the information contained in the confidential tax returns being sought be of "such importance that the ends of justice require that the secrecy and confidentiality of such returns be violated." There is no further definition of this standard in the Code nor in any judicial interpretation.

I have turned for guidance, therefore, to the similar Federal Statute, 26 U.S.C. § 6103(i)(1)(B). This provision requires, among other things, that the information sought to be disclosed "cannot reasonably be obtained from any other source, unless it is determined that, notwithstanding the reasonable availability *166of the information from another source, the return or return information sought constitutes the most probative evidence of a matter in issue relating to the commission of such criminal act."

Similarly, in interpreting the Virginia Statute, the availability of the information from other sources and its relative probative value are questions which should be considered in determining if it is of "such importance that the ends of justice require" the violation of this secrecy and confidentiality. Since the information in this case can reasonably be obtained form other sources and does not constitute the most probative evidence of a matter in issue in this case, it follows that the information in the envelope is not of such importance that the ends of justice require" that its secrecy and confidentiality be violated.

Therefore, I have concluded that the envelope forwarded by the Department of Taxation in response to the Commonwealth’s Subpoena Duces Tecum should be returned to the Department of Taxation without its contents being revealed.
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

In connection with the March 31, 2004 Form 10-Q of Cornell Companies,Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harry J. Phillips, Jr., Chief ExecutiveOfficer and the Chairman of the Board, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Harry J. Phillips, Jr.              |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Harry J. Phillips, Jr.  Chief Executive |
|   | Officer and Chairman of  the Board      |
|   | May 10, 2004                            |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 2, 2012

d0425 

# Order

May 2, 2012

143475 & (58)

BRUCE WHITMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v SC: 143475 COA: 294703 Genesee CC: 08-087993-CL CITY OF BURTON a nd CHARLES SMILEY, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 5, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellants are considered, and they are GRAN TED. The parties shall include among the
issues to be briefed whether Shallal v Catholic Social Se rvices of Wayne County , 455 Mich 604 (1997), correctly held that the primary motivation of an employee pursuing a
whistleblower claim must be a desire to inform the public on matters of public concern, as opposed to person al vindictiveness.

Persons or groups interested in the determ ination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permissi on to file briefs amicus curiae.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. SHAUN PATRICK BUSH, Respondent. No. 2D23-1709 April 10, 2024 Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Lyann Goudie, Judge. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James A. Hellickson Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Petitioner. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Andrea M. Norgard, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. Denied. SILBERMAN, KELLY, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership III-C ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 28th day of March, 2003.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP III-C
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 187 (Thursday, September 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45303-45304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20945]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-17-045]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: October 5, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

[[Page 45304]]


Matters to be Considered:
    1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Vote in Inv. No. TA-201-76 (Injury) (Large Residential Washers).
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 26, 2017.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-20945 Filed 9-26-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P