alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998             SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           1,606                     206
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,670                  12,310
<ALLOWANCES>                                       876                     593
<INVENTORY>                                     20,553                  16,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,547                  32,044
<PP&E>                                          29,942                  23,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,611                   8,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,006                  93,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,888                   9,423
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            81                      73
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,664                  84,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,006                  93,798
<SALES>                                         65,462                  55,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,462                  55,657
<CGS>                                           25,394                  22,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,394                  22,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   201                     193
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                     121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,037                   6,296
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,946                   2,513
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,091                   3,783
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,091                   3,783
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.81                    0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.77                    0.50
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boykin Lodging Company (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Robert W. Boykin, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  |                                                                                                                                                         
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| |  | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/  Robert W. Boykin
Robert W. Boykin
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Boykin Lodging Company and will be retained by Boykin Lodging
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LEGATO SYSTEMS, INC.

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

   Legato Systems Pty. Ltd.--Australia

   Legato Systems International, Inc.--Barbados

   Legato Systems s.a./n.v.--Belgium

   Legato Systems do Brazil Ltda.--Brazil

   Legato Systems (Canada), Inc.--Canada

   Vinca Corporation China--China

   LGTO S.A.R.L.--France

   Legato Systems Deutschland GmbH--Germany

   Legato Systems, H.K. Ltd.--Hong Kong

   Legato Systems India Pvt. Ltd.--India

   Legato Italia SRL--Italy

   Legato Systems KK--Japan

   Legato Systems Nederland B.V.--Netherlands

   Legato Systems Inc.--Poland

   FullTime Software PTE Ltd.--Singapore

   Legato Systems Pte. Ltd.--Singapore

   Legato System AB--Sweden

   Legato Systems Schweiz GmbH--Switzerland

   Legato Systems UK Ltd.--United Kingdom

   Intelliguard Software, Inc.--United States

   O.R.P., Inc.--United States

   FullTime Software, Inc.--United States

   Lasso Acquisition Corp.--United States

   Vinca Corporation--United States
_____________

No. 96-1725SI

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

Oscar Solis Perales, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

Submitted: September 10, 1996

 Filed: September 16, 1996

_____________

Before FAGG, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and 

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Oscar Solis Perales appeals the district court's denial of Perales's

motion to suppress. Perales contends the police concocted a traffic stop

because they suspected Perales was engaged in drug-dealing activity.

Contrary to Perales's view, the record shows the police had probable cause

to believe Perales committed a traffic violation; thus, Perales's trafficbased detention was constitutionally reasonable. Whren v. United States,

116 S. Ct. 1769, 1777 (1996). We also reject Perales's contention that

"the [traffic] stop was pretextual and therefore unconstitutional." Id.

at 1774. Having considered all of Perales's arguments, we affirm the

district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                         438,403
<SECURITIES>                                    92,194
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,693,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                   514,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,744,924
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,760,050
<PP&E>                                       8,344,927
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,969,138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,636,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,531,803
<BONDS>                                      8,296,063
<COMMON>                                         2,562
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,808,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,636,353
<SALES>                                     25,647,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,962,612
<CGS>                                       16,781,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,051,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,060,397
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                74,648
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,647,397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,842,739
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,819,933)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,662,672
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.03
        

</TABLE>
COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY 

AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS 

JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut, Chairman 

CARL LEVIN, Michigan 

DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii 

THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware 

MARK L. PRYOR, Arkansas 

MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana 

BARACK OBAMA, Illinois 

CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri 

JON TESTER, Montana 

SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine 

TED STEVENS, Alaska 

GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio 

NORM COLEMAN, Minnesota 

TOM COBURN, Oklahoma 

PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico 

JOHN WARNER, Virginia 

JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire 

MICHAEL L. ALEXANDER, Staff Director 

BRANDON L. MILHORN, Minority Staff Director and Chief Counsel 

TRINA DRIESSNACK TYRER, Chief Clerk 

PATRICIA R. HOGAN, GPO Detailee and Publications Clerk 


rmajette on PRODPC74 with MISCELLANEOUS
```

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350,  chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of ITEX Corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify
with  respect to the annual  report of the Company on Form  10-KSB/A-1  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) the annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information  contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                          /s/ Lewis "Spike" Humer
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Lewis "Spike" Humer,
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)
```
<PAGE>

             INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SCHEDULE AND CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
BioSource International, Inc.

The audits referred to in our report dated February 20, 1998 included the
related consolidated financial statement schedule for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1997, included in the Form 10-K. This
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule
based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-
05391) on Form S-3 and the registration statements (Nos. 33-65562, 33-91838) on
Form S-8 of BioSource International, Inc. of our report dated February 20, 1998,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of BioSource International, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows and related
schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997,
which report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of
BioSource International, Inc.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick

Los Angeles, California
March 31, 1998
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, David M. Barnes, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American United Global,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



                                                 /s/ David M. Barnes
Date: April 28, 2006                             -------------------------
                                                 David M. Barnes
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### MICHIGAN CENT. R. CO. v. CONSOLIDATED CAR HEATING CO.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 14, 1895

No. 250.

Appear—Assignments of Error—Waiver of Defects—Rehearing.

Where counsel have discussed in their briefs a question as to the effect of amending the specifications of a patent in the patent office, under a general assignment that the court erred in holding the patent valid, without raising any objection in regard to the sufficiency of the assignment of errors, they cannot afterwards insist, on motion for rehearing, that the assignment was not sufficiently specific.

.Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.

This was a suit in equity hy the Consolidated Car Heating Company against the Michigan Central Railroad Company for infringement of letters patent No. 329,017, for improvements iu steam car heaters granted October 27, 1885, to Elmore D. Gody. The circuit court entered a decree for complainant. Defendant appealed to this court, which, on April 2, 1895, reversed the decree, and ordered the bill dismissed, holding that the second claim of the patent was void for reasons stated in the opinion. 14 C. 0. A. 232, 67 Fed. 121. A petition has now been filed for a rehearing.

J. C. Sturgeon and J. B. Foraker, for appellant.

R. A. Darker, for appellee.

Before TAFT and LURTON, Circuit Judges, and SE VERENS, District Judge.

SEYERENS, District Judge.

The grounds upon which a rehearing is prayed in this case are such only as have been already argued by counsel and fully considered by the court in its former opinion, with the exception of one, which is that there was no assignment of error upon which the court could consider the effect of the amendment of the specifications of the Cody patent while his application was pending in the patent office. The first of the errors assigned *2was that the court erred,“in that it ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the letters patent No. 329,017, granted on the 27th day of October, 1885, to Elmore D. Cody and John W. Hayes, assignee of a one-half interest therein, for a new and useful improvement in steam car heaters, are good and valid letters patent.” In the brief of the appellant’s counsel the objection to the validity of the patent, founded upon the change of the specifications, was distinctly taken. The brief of counsel for appellee, under a distinct head of the argument, took up and discussed this subject at considerable length without any suggestion that the assignment of error was not sufficiently specific. As the assignment in general terms covered this subject-matter, and it was treated and discussed as falling under the assignment, we think it is too late to complain of the failure to more specifically assign the error, and that the appellee should be deemed to have waived a more definite assignment, if indeed that was necessary.

The petition is overruled.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Jonah Shacknai, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Medicis PharmaceuticalCorporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: February 29, 2008JONAH SHACKNAI/s/ JONAH SHACKNAI
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated April 24, 2018, with respect to the financial statement of Smart Trust 378 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-222944) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 24, 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3088 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3088

 To direct the Secretary of Defense to post on the public Web site of 
the Department of Defense the cost to each American taxpayer of each of 
               the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 2011

 Mr. Lewis of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Towns, Mr. Filner, Ms. Lee of 
   California, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. Conyers, Ms. 
Woolsey, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. McDermott, Mrs. Christensen, Ms. Jackson Lee 
  of Texas, Mr. Stark, and Mr. Payne) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Defense to post on the public Web site of 
the Department of Defense the cost to each American taxpayer of each of 
               the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cost of War Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. COST OF WARS.

    The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Commissioner of 
Internal Revenue, shall post on the public Web site of the Department 
of Defense the cost to each American taxpayer of each of the wars in 
Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya.
                                 <all>
```