alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                         WHOLESOME AND HEARTY FOODS, INC.
                      CALCULATIONS OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                   The Year Ended December 31,
                                   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   1996                           1995                          1994
                                   --------------------------     -------------------------     --------------------------
                                   Primary      Fully Diluted     Primary     Fully Diluted     Primary      Fully Diluted
                                   --------------------------     -------------------------     --------------------------
<S>                                <C>          <C>               <C>         <C>               <C>          <C>

Weighted Average Shares
Outstanding for the Period          8,455,623      8,455,623      7,670,322      7,670,322      7,566,245      7,566,245

Dilutive Common Stock
Options Using the Treasury
Stock Method                          610,346        609,721        968,369        968,918      1,011,662      1,011,662
                                  ---------------------------  ----------------------------   ----------------------------

Total Shares Used for Per
Share Calculations                  9,065,969      9,065,344      8,638,691      8,639,240      8,577,907      8,577,907
                                  ---------------------------  ----------------------------   ----------------------------
                                  ---------------------------  ----------------------------   ----------------------------

Net Income                        $ 1,063,000     $1,063,000   $  2,510,000   $  2,510,000    $ 2,391,000     $2,391,000
                                  ---------------------------  ----------------------------   ----------------------------
                                  ---------------------------  ----------------------------   ----------------------------

Net Income Per Share                  $  0.12        $  0.12        $  0.29        $  0.29        $  0.28        $  0.28
                                  ---------------------------  ----------------------------   ----------------------------
                                  ---------------------------  ----------------------------   ----------------------------

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 28, 2014

d0324 

# Order

Clerk March 28, 2014

148307

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148307

COA: 308500

Wayne CC: 11

- 007944

- FH

DANIEL DEAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 12, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00860

- CR

Michael MACIEL

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR4959B

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

A Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal has been filed in each of

these appeals in which the trial court judge certifies that the underlying criminal case “is a plea

bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” It is therefore ORDERED that the trial

court clerk file an electronic clerk’s record in each of these appeals w ithin ten days from the date

of this order containing the following documents:

1. All pre

- trial orders and the related pre

- trial motions;

2. The Court Admonishments, the Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony and

Stipulations, and all other docume nts relating to the defendant’s plea bargain;

3. The judgment;

4. All post

- judgment motions and orders;

5. The notice of appeal;

6. The Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and

7. The criminal docket sheet.All other appel late deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The clerk of this

court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court clerk,

and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in these appeals.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                        0000858660
<NAME>                        Maxxim Medical, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 NOV-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   NOV-01-1998
<CASH>                           4,125
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                   72,269
<ALLOWANCES>                     1,840
<INVENTORY>                     79,648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               173,217
<PP&E>                         169,048
<DEPRECIATION>                  41,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 468,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           64,299
<BONDS>                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                            14
<OTHER-SE>                     272,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   468,051
<SALES>                        522,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               522,516
<CGS>                          381,638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  476,048
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              13,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 34,090
<INCOME-TAX>                    14,454
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             19,636
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                    19,636
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     1.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                     1.50
        


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Steven Wayne PRUETT, Appellant.

No. 06-3500.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 8, 2008.

Filed: April 17, 2008.

Paul D. Scott, Clive, IA, for appellant.

Benjamin J. Stansberry, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Des Moines, IA, for appellee.

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. *See Pruett v. United States,*— U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 1473, 170 L.Ed.2d 294 (2008), *vacating and remanding*501 F.3d 976 (8th Cir.2007). We are instructed to further consider this case in light of *Watson v. United States,*which ruled that “a person does not ‘use’ a firearm under [18 U.S.C.] § 924(c)(1)(A) when he receives it in trade for drugs.” — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 579, 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 472 (2007). Based on *Watson,*we reverse Steven Wayne Pruett’s 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) conviction for using a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime (Count 8 of the superseding indictment).

A jury convicted Pruett on six criminal counts relating to the possession and distribution of methamphetamine.1 Pruett appealed, arguing, inter alia, that the District Court erred by submitting to the jury the charge of use of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). We affirmed the judgment of the District Court.

Count 8 of the superseding indictment was predicated on Pruett’s receipt of a firearm in exchange for methamphetamine. On appeal, Pruett argued that the term “uses” in § 924(c)(1)(A) requires something more than mere receipt of a firearm. We determined that Pruett’s argument was precluded by *United States v. Cannon,*which held that “a person can ‘use’ a firearm in violation of § 924(c) by ‘receiv*864ing’ the firearm in a drugs for weapon exchange.” 88 F.3d 1495, 1509 (8th Cir.1996). After our opinion affirming Pruett’s conviction was issued, the Supreme Court decided *Watson.*In *Watson,*the Court addressed the question of “whether a person who trades his drugs for a gun ‘uses’ a firearm ‘during and in relation to ... [a] drug trafficking crime’ within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A).” 128 S.Ct. at 581. The Court concluded that “he does not” and reversed the conviction of a defendant charged with receiving a pistol in exchange for drugs. *Id.*In light of *Watson, Cannon*is no longer good law on this point, and Pruett’s conviction based on his exchange of drugs for a gun cannot stand.

We reverse the judgment of conviction on Count 8. Because *Watson*does not affect our earlier decision affirming the District Court’s judgment with respect to the other five counts on which Pruett was convicted, we reinstate our earlier opinion, with this opinion serving only to modify our earlier opinion’s discussion of Count 8 (primarily found in Section VI of our earlier opinion). The case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

1

. The facts of this case are set forth in *United States v. Pruett,*501 F.3d 976 (8th Cir.2007), *judgment vacated*by-U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 1473, 170 L.Ed.2d 294 (2008).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-42634) pertaining to the Employee Nonqualified Stock Option
Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-32961) pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated
Employee Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8 No. 33-72614) pertaining to the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8 No. 33-99164) pertaining to the SIG Holdings,
Inc. 1992 Long Term Incentive Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-96293) pertaining to the
Amended and Restated Directors Stock Option Plan, (Form S-3 No. 33-77028) and in
the related Prospectus pertaining to the Shelf Registration of securities of
Delphi Financial Group, Inc. of our report dated February 4, 2000, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1999.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 10, 2000
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-110207 and33-81976 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement No. 333-82892 on Form S-8 of our report datedFebruary 28, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. andsubsidiaries (such report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphreferring to the changes in the method of financial statement presentation related to purchases andsales of inventory with the same counterparty) and our report dated February 28, 2007 relating tomanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries for the year endedDecember 31, 2006. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Houston, TexasFebruary 28, 2007
| Exhibit      10.2 | Loan      and Security Agreement (Accounts Receivable Line of Credit) dated as of      October 30, 2009 between the Company and Silicon Valley    Bank |
|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

In handling any confidential information, Bank shallexercise the same degree of care that it exercises for its own proprietaryinformation, but disclosure of information may be made: (a) to Bank’sSubsidiaries or Affiliates; (b) to prospective transferees or purchasers of anyinterest in the Advances (provided, however, Bank shall use commerciallyreasonable efforts to obtain such prospective transferee’s or purchaser’sagreement to the terms of this provision); (c) as required by law,regulation, subpoena, or other order; (d) to Bank’s regulators or asotherwise required in connection with Bank’s examination or audit; (e) as Bankconsiders appropriate in exercising remedies under the Loan Documents; and (f)to third-party service providers of Bank so

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00079

- CR

FELLISIA MESHAUN FORD, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 71st District Court Harrison County, Texas Trial Court No. 15

- 0398X

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### O R D E R
Appellant Fellisia Meshaun Ford was convicted of assaulting a public servant and evading arrest/detention with a vehicle and was sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment. On August 8,
2018, Ford’s court

- appointed appellate counsel, Timothy J. Cariker, filed an Anders 1 brief, and on

A ugust 14, 2018, Ford filed her pro se motion for access to the record. Pursuant to Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 321

– 22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), we are now required to enter an order specifying the procedure to be followed to ensure Ford’s access to the record. This order is intended to accomplish that goal. Cariker advised this Court that on August 6, 2018, he mailed a complete paper copy of the appellate record to Ford. Allowing a generous fifteen days for that record to be delivered to Ford and givin g Ford thirty days to prepare and file her pro se response, we hereby set September 20, 2018, as the deadline for Ford to file her pro se response to Cariker’s Anders brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: August 21, 2018

1 See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 73 8 (1967)

.
10 EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT - Continued

Washington, DC Senior Advisor for International Hal Scott Shapiro

Economic Policy & Senior 

Counselor to the Director

AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Senior Advisor Daniel Rosen AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Special Assistant to the President Patrick Dorton

& Communications Director for 

the National Economic Council

AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... International Economic Policy Timothy Punke

Analyst

AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Special Assistant to the President Andrea Kane

for Domestic Policy

AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Advisor for Communications & Sean Dobson

Strategy

AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Policy Advisor Edwin Park AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Associate Director & Senior Margy Waller

Advisor for Welfare & Working 

Families

AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Chief of Operations & Senior Melissa Green

Advisor to the Director of the 

National Economic Council

AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Associate Director for Domestic Heather Howard

Policy

AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Special Assistant to the President Leanne Shimabukuro

for Domestic Policy

AD XS ...... ...... ......

OFFICE OF 

ADMINISTRATION

 Do........... Director, Office of Michael J. Lyle

Administration

AD PA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... General Counsel Michael K. Bartosz AD XS ...... ...... ......

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT 

AND BUDGET

 Do........... Director, Office of Management Jacob J. Lew

and Budget

EX PAS I ...... ......

 Do........... Deputy Director, Office of Sylvia Mathews

Management and Budget

EX PAS II ...... ......

 Do........... Deputy Director for Management Sally Katzen EX PAS II ...... ......

 Do........... Executive Associate Director and Joshua Gotbaum

Controller

EX PAS III ...... ......

 Do........... Associate Director for Vacant

Administration

ES ... ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Associate Director for Legislative Vacant

Affairs

ES ... ...... ...... ......

 Do........... General Counsel Career Incumbent ES CA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Assistant to the Deputy Director John M. Kamensky

for Management

ES NA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Associate Director for Economic Joseph J. Minarik

Policy

ES NA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Senior Advisor for Executive and Robert L. Nabors, III

Administrative Issues

ES TA ...... ...... 08/14/01

 Do........... Associate Director for Linda Ricci

Communications

ES NA ...... ...... ......
Exhibit 12
 
 Six Months Ended
    
    
    Years EndedFiscal Years Ended June 30,
    
    
    December 31,
    
    
    December 31,2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2007(Restated)
    
    
    (Restated)
    
    
    (Restated)
    
    
    (Restated)
    
    
    (Restated)
    
    
    (Restated)
    
    
    (Restated)EARNINGS:Income (loss) before income
tax expense
    
    $
    39,919
    
    
    $
    57,057
    
    
    $
    89,425
    
    
    $
    29,944
    
    
    $
    81,617
    
    
    $
    (72,722
    )
    
    $
    118,980Add: Fixed charges
    
    
    14,375
    
    
    
    13,161
    
    
    
    12,993
    
    
    
    6,454
    
    
    
    6,547
    
    
    
    13,026
    
    
    
    12,856Earnings as defined
    
    $
    54,294
    
    
    $
    70,218
    
    
    $
    102,418
    
    
    $
    36,398
    
    
    $
    88,164
    
    
    $
    (59,696
    )
    
    $
    131,836FIXED CHARGES:Interest expense
    
    $
    10,038
    
    
    $
    8,663
    
    
    $
    8,488
    
    
    $
    4,244
    
    
    $
    4,253
    
    
    $
    8,488
    
    
    $
    8,495Amortization of deferred
financing fees
    
    
    2,542
    
    
    
    2,145
    
    
    
    2,152
    
    
    
    1,080
    
    
    
    1,080
    
    
    
    2,168
    
    
    
    1,523Interest expense as reported
    
    
    12,580
    
    
    
    10,808
    
    
    
    10,640
    
    
    
    5,324
    
    
    
    5,333
    
    
    
    10,640
    
    
    
    10,018Portion of rent
expense as interest
    
    
    1,795
    
    
    
    2,353
    
    
    
    2,353
    
    
    
    1,129
    
    
    
    1,214
    
    
    
    2,386
    
    
    
    2,838Fixed charges as defined
    
    $
    14,375
    
    
    $
    13,161
    
    
    $
    12,993
    
    
    $
    6,453
    
    
    $
    6,547
    
    
    $
    13,026
    
    
    $
    12,856Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    3.8
    x
    
    
    5.3
    x
    
    
    7.9
    x
    
    
    5.6
    x
    
    
    13.5
    x
    
    
    (4.6
    )x
    
    
    10.3
    x
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 15

- 588 C

Filed: June 17 , 2015

***************************************

*

GUAM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.

, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

v. *

*

THE UNITED STATES, *

*

Defendant, *

*

v. *

*

CABRAS MARINE CORP., *

*

Defendant

- Intervenor. *

*

***************************************

Lee Dougherty , Offit Kurman, P.A.

, Tysons Corner, VA, Counsel for the Plaintiff

.

Amelia R.S.H. Lister

- Sobotkin , United States Department of Justice, Civil Division

, Washington, D.C ., Counsel for the Government.

Paul Honigberg

, Blank Rome LLP, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Defendant

- Intervenor.

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER

Pursuant to the June 17, 2015 telephonic status conference, the Government is

preliminarily enjoined from activity on the disputed contract. An opinion will follow in the

coming days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Susan G. Braden

SUSAN G. BRADEN

Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15293 and #15294; U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Disaster Number VI-00009]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-4335-DR), dated 09/07/2017.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Irma.                    

*Incident Period:*                         09/05/2017 through 09/07/2017.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 09/18/2017.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/06/2017.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/07/2018.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the U.S. Virgin Islands, dated 09/07/2017, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 09/05/2017 through 09/07/2017.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2017-20744 Filed 9-27-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P