alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 298 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 500 East Whitestone Boulevard in Cedar 

Park, Texas, as the ‘‘Army Specialist Matthew Troy 

Morris Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 298 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. ARMY SPECIALIST MATTHEW TROY MORRIS 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 500 East Whitestone Boulevard 

5 in Cedar Park, Texas, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Army Specialist Matthew Troy Morris Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Army Specialist Mat12 thew Troy Morris Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 14, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BOYKIN LODGING COMPANY AS OF JUNE 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         641,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                (46,848)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 614,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        293,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     280,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   614,756
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,409
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,413
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,413
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,413
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT UTILIZES AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET THEREFORE CURRENT ASSETS AND
CURRENT LIABILITIES ARE NOT APPLICABLE.
</FN>


</TABLE>
1 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Chie f Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-3990

___________ Quet Sledge, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Michael J. Astrue, * Social Security Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 21, 2010 Filed: February 5, 2010

___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Quet Sledge appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits. Sledge alleged disability since January 2005 from degenerative joint disease, anxiety, and a bipolar diso rder. After a September 2007 hearing, where Sledge was counseled, an administrative law judge (ALJ) determined that Sledge had engaged in substantial gainfu l activity until at least March 31, 2005; that her combined physical and mental impairments were seve re, but alone or combined, they did not-2- meet or equal the requirements of any listi ng; that her subjective complaints were not entirely credible; and that based on a voca tional expert’s response to the ALJ’s hypothetical, Sledge’s mental residual f unctional capacity (RFC) and physical RFC did not preclude her past relevant work as a data-entry worker, and further, she could perform specified unskilled sedentary jobs existing in substantial numbers. The Appeals Council denied review, and the district court summarily affirmed. Following de novo review of the record, see Davidson v. Astrue , 578 F.3d 838, 841-42 (8th Cir. 2009), we affirm.
Contrary to Sledge’s primar y assertions of error, we conclude that the ALJ gave good reasons for discounting the low global-assessment-of-functioning ratings of Sledge’s treating mental health providers. See Hacker v. Barnhart , 459 F.3d 934, 937 (8th Cir. 2006) (ALJ may elect in certain circumstances not to give controlling weight to treating physician’s opinion, as record mu st be evaluated as whole; for treating physician’s opinion to have controlling we ight, it must be supported by medically acceptable diagnostic techniques and not be inconsistent with other substantial evidence in case record; physician’s own in consistency may diminish or eliminate weight accorded to his opinion). We also conclude that the ALJ’s mental RFC findings are supported by substantial evid ence on the record as a whole. See Davidson , 578 F.3d at 844 (ALJ should dete rmine RFC based on all relevant evidence, including medical records, observa tions of treating physicians and others, and claimant’s own description of her limitations). We reject as meritless Sledge’s other arguments for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                   0001016130
<NAME>                  United Community Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                       1
<CURRENCY>                                                US Dollars
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS                                 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                           JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                             JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                    1
<CASH>                                                             0
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   0
<PP&E>                                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              0
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                          80
<OTHER-SE>                                                       (80)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       0
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   0
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.00
        



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 24, 2021 b0317

Order 

Clerk

March 24, 2021

161275

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161275

COA: 345742

Bay CC: 18-010043-FH

JAMES EDWARD JONES,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATIONS




I, Roy
Swan, certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Carver Bancorp,
Inc.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred  during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.










Date:  February 14,
      2008
            /s/ Roy
      SwanRoy
      SwanExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
EX-10.18




 Exhibit 10.18 

Commencement Date Memorandum 

THIS MEMORANDUM is made and entered into as of August 17, 2017, by and between Station Park CenterCal, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (“Landlord”), and Pluralsight, LLC, a Utah limited liability company (“Tenant”). 

RECITALS: 
 A. By that
certain Multi-Tenant Office Lease Agreement dated as of September 20, 2013, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Office Lease dated October 13, 2015 (collectively the “Lease”), pursuant to which Tenant leased from
Landlord a certain expansion premises designated as Suite J-300 (“Premises”), located in the development commonly known as “Station Park” in Farmington, Utah (“Building”). 

B. Landlord and Tenant desire to confirm the Expansion Premises Commencement Date and the date the Expansion Term of the Lease expires. 

C. Unless otherwise provided herein, all capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Memorandum have the meaning ascribed to them in the
Lease. 
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: 

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	The Expansion Premises Commencement Date under the Lease is February 16, 2016. 

  

	 	2.	The Expansion Term of the Lease expires on February 28, 2021, unless the Lease is sooner terminated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Lease. 


 

	 	3.	The rentable area of the Expansion Premises is 43,145 square feet. 

  

	 	4.	Tenant shall exercise its right to the Expansion Renewal Term, if at all, before February 29, 2020 subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in Section 1.2.4 of the Lease.


  

	 	5.	This Memorandum may be executed in counterparts, each of which is an original and all of which constitute one instrument. 


Landlord and Tenant each caused this Memorandum to be executed by its duly authorized representative as of the day and date written above,

  

									
	LANDLORD:	  	TENANT:
		
	Station Park CenterCal, LLC,	  	Pluralsight, LLC, a Utah limited liability company
	a Delaware limited liability company	  		  	
					
		  	By:	  	CenterCal, LLC,	  	By:	  	 /s/ Anita Grantham

		  		  	a Delaware limited liability company	  	Name:	  	Anita Grantham
		  	Its:	  	Sole Member	  	Title:	  	Chief People Officer

  

											
						
		  		  	By:	  	CenterCal Association, LLC,	  		  	
		  		  		  	a Delaware limited liability company	  		  	
		  		  	Its:	  	Manager	  		  	
						
		  		  	By:	  	 /s/ illegible
	  		  	
		  		  	Its:	  	 President
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 23, 2009 

s0316 

Order 

 

March 23, 2009 

137434 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137434 

 COA: 286317 

Wayne CC: 93-000581-FC 

LEWIS AARON NIXON, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 30, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
#### STATE v. GREEN.

The Case Immediately Preceding is conclusive of this.

Before Townsend, J., Georgetown, May, 1897.

Reversed.

*527Indictment against Zachariah D. Green, as judge of probate, for failure to perform official duties. From judgment against defendant, he appeals.

*Messrs. J. Jenkins Hucks*and *Lee &*Moise, for appellant.

*Solicitor*Wilson, contra.

July 7, 1898.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The appellant was tried and convicted upon an indictment, of which the following is a copy, to wit: “The State of South Carolina, County of Georgetown. At a Court of General Sessions, begun and holden in and for the county of Georgetown, in the State of South Carolina, at Georgetown Court House, in the county and State aforesaid, on the second Monday of February, in the year of our Ford 1897, the jurors of and for the county aforesaid, in the State aforesaid, upon their oaths, present that Zachariah D. Green, late of the county and State aforesaid, on the 12th day of July, in the year of our Ford 1894, with force and arms, at Georgetown, in the county and State aforesaid, being the judge of probate of said county, and by virtue of said office being the public guardian, and having in his charge as such officer and guardian a certain estate, to wit: the estate of W. F. Elliott, and having funds belonging to said estate, did then and there loan of said estate’s funds as an investment, $700 to one Samuel J. Fee, now deceased, without said investment being made under the direction and with the approval of any presiding Judge, or of the Judge of the Third Judicial Circuit, which said Circuit is the one in which the said judge of probate resides, and without being upon a petition and proof that said investment was a safe and proper one, against the form of the statutes in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the said State. John S. Wilson, solicitor.”

Upon the reading of the indictment the defendant’s attorneys demurred to the same, and moved to quash it upon grounds similar to those set out in the case of The State *v.*
      *528Green, which has just been filed. The indictment charges simply a failure or neglect of duty, and must be regarded as framed under section 308 of the Criminal Code. The case of The State *v.*Green, just filed, is conclusive of the questions raised in this case.

It is, therefore, the judgment of this Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, and that the case be remanded to that Court, with directions to quash the indictment.

Mr. Chief Justice McIver *concurs*ill result.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET - UNAUDITED AND CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF
INCOME  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>        0000859360
<NAME>       LEGATO SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                      27,673
<SECURITIES>                                                29,408
<RECEIVABLES>                                                9,839
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  (812)
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            65,425
<PP&E>                                                       6,029
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              83,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       13,500
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         2
<OTHER-SE>                                                  68,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                83,142
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            54,249
<CGS>                                                        5,117
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               40,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             15,124
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 6,504
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 8,620
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.46



</TABLE>