45608 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2017 / Notices 

contact Mr. James Bennett, Program 

Manager, Office of Renewable Energy 

Programs, by telephone at 703–787– 

1300 or by email at james.bennett@

boem.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 5, 

2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 

District of Columbia Circuit vacated the 

2009 Cape Wind Energy Project Final 

EIS and ordered that BOEM: 

‘‘supplement [the EIS] with adequate 

geological surveys before Cape Wind 

may begin construction.’’ Public 

Employees for Environmental 

Responsibility v. Hopper, 827 F.3d 1077, 

1084 (D.C. Cir. 2016). The Court opined 

that: ‘‘[w]ithout adequate geological 

surveys, the [BOEM] cannot ‘ensure that 

the seafloor [will be] able to support’ 

wind turbines.’’ Id. at 1083. While the 

Court found that: ‘‘[BOEM] therefore 

had violated NEPA (National 

Environmental Policy Act)’’ the Court 

noted that ‘‘. . . [it] does not necessarily 

mean that the project must be halted or 

that Cape Wind must redo the 

regulatory approval process.’’ Id. at 

1083–4. The Court explicitly left 

undisturbed BOEM’s 2010 decision to 

issue the lease and BOEM’s 2011 

decision to approve the Construction 

and Operations Plan (COP). Id. at 1084. 

In light of the remand order and the 

remaining valid lease and COP, only 

two alternatives remain relevant to the 

court’s remand: The Proposed Action 

(affirming BOEM’s issuance of the 

existing lease) and the No Action 

Alternative (BOEM rescinding the 

lease). In its Final SEIS, BOEM 

examines the available geological survey 

data, including the geotechnical data 

and reports submitted to BOEM since 

the 2009 Final EIS, any other relevant 

data that relates to the adequacy of the 

seafloor to support wind turbines in the 

lease area, and considers public 

comments. 

On March 31, 2017, BOEM published 

the Draft SEIS, in response to the 

Court’s 2016 remand order discussed 

above, and a NOA in the Federal 

Register to announce the availability of 

the Draft SEIS and initiate a 45-day 

public comment period (82 FR 16060). 

Comments received can be found at 

http://www.regulations.gov by searching 

for docket ID BOEM–2017–0008. The 

Final SEIS addressed comments 

received by BOEM in response to the 

Draft SEIS during the 45-day comment 

period. On August 4, 2017 (82 FR 

36418), BOEM published a NOA 

announcing the availability of the Final 

SEIS in the Federal Register. The Final 

SEIS can be found on BOEM’s Web site 

at: https://www.boem.gov/ 

Massachusetts-Cape-Wind/. 

Authority: This notice is published 

pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR part 

1506.6(b)) implementing the provisions of 

the National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 

Dated: September 26, 2017. 

Walter D. Cruickshank, 

Acting Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management. 

[FR Doc. 2017–20936 Filed 9–28–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1054] 

Certain Height-Adjustable Desk 

Platforms and Components Thereof; 

Commission’s Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigation Based 

on Settlement; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 10) terminating the 

investigation based on settlement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office 

of the General Counsel, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of 

non-confidential documents filed in 

connection with this investigation are or 

will be available for inspection during 

official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 

p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at https://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on May 4, 2017 based on a complaint, 

filed on behalf of Varidesk LLC of 

Coppell, Texas (‘‘complainant’’). 82 FR 

20919–20 (May 4, 2017). The complaint 

as supplemented alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain height-adjustable desk platforms 

and components thereof by reason of 

infringement of U.S. Patent No. 

9,113,703; U.S. Patent No. 9,277,809; 

and U.S. Patent No. 9,554,644. The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by section 337. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named Lumi Legend Corporation of 

Ningbo, China; Innovative Office 

Products LLC of Easton, Pennsylvania; 

Ergotech Group LLC of Easton, 

Pennsylvania; Monoprice, Inc. of 

Rancho Cucamonga, California; and 

Transform Partners LLC (dba Mount-It!) 

of San Diego, California (collectively 

‘‘the Lumi Legend respondents’’); 

Loctek Ergonomic Technology 

Corporation (formerly, Ningbo Loctek 

Visual Technology Corporation of 

Ningbo, China) of Ningbo, China; 

Zhejiang Loctek Smart Drive 

Technology Co., Ltd. of Ningbo, China; 

and Loctek Inc.’s (formerly, Zoxou, Inc. 

of Fremont, California) of Fremont, 

California (collectively herein, ‘‘Loctek 

respondents’’). The Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations did not participate 

in the investigation. The Lumi Legend 

respondents were previously terminated 

based on settlement. Order No. 5 

(unreviewed, Commission Notice (July 

11, 2017)). 

On August 29, 2017, complainant and 

the Loctek respondents filed a joint 

motion to terminate the Locktek 

respondents based on settlement. The 

motion asserted that there are no other 

agreements between complainant and 

the Loctek respondents. The parties 

represented ‘‘there are no other 

agreements, written or oral, express or 

implied, between these parties 

concerning the subject matter of the 

Investigation.’’ Motion at 1. 

On August 31, 2017, the ALJ issued 

an ID (Order No. 10) terminating the 

investigation based on settlement of the 

Loctek respondents. The ALJ found that 

all of the requirements of Commission 

rule 210.21, 19 CFR 210.21, had been 

met and that there were no public 

interest concerns that would weigh 

against termination. No petitions for 

review were filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID and terminates 

the investigation. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2017 / Notices 45609 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 26, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–20904 Filed 9–28–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–584 and 731– 

TA–1382 (Preliminary)] 

Uncoated Groundwood Paper From 

Canada; Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigations, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant 

to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), 

that there is a reasonable indication that 

an industry in the United States is 

materially injured by reason of imports 

of uncoated groundwood paper from 

Canada, provided for in subheadings 

4801.00.01, 4802.61.10, 4802.61.20, 

4802.61.31, 4802.61.60, 4802.62.10, 

4802.62.20, 4802.62.30, 4802.62.61, 

4802.69.10, 4802.69.20, 4802.69.30, 

4805.91.50, 4805.91.70, and 4805.91.90 

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States, that are alleged to be 

sold in the United States at less than fair 

value (‘‘LTFV’’) and to be subsidized by 

the government of Canada. 

Commencement of Final Phase 

Investigations 

Pursuant to section 207.18 of the 

Commission’s rules, the Commission 

also gives notice of the commencement 

of the final phase of its investigations. 

The Commission will issue a final phase 

notice of scheduling, which will be 

published in the Federal Register as 

provided in section 207.21 of the 

Commission’s rules, upon notice from 

the Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Commerce’’) of affirmative 

preliminary determinations in the 

investigations under sections 703(b) or 

733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary 

determinations are negative, upon 

notice of affirmative final 

determinations in those investigations 

under sections 705(a) or 735(a) of the 

Act. Parties that filed entries of 

appearance in the preliminary phase of 

the investigations need not enter a 

separate appearance for the final phase 

of the investigations. Industrial users, 

and, if the merchandise under 

investigation is sold at the retail level, 

representative consumer organizations 

have the right to appear as parties in 

Commission antidumping and 

countervailing duty investigations. The 

Secretary will prepare a public service 

list containing the names and addresses 

of all persons, or their representatives, 

who are parties to the investigations. 

Background 

On August 9, 2017, North Pacific 

Paper Company (‘‘NORPAC’’), 

Longview, Washington filed a petition 

with the Commission and Commerce, 

alleging that an industry in the United 

States is materially injured or 

threatened with material injury by 

reason of LTFV and subsidized imports 

of uncoated groundwood paper from 

Canada. Accordingly, effective August 

9, 2017, the Commission, pursuant to 

sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)), instituted 

countervailing duty investigation No. 

701–TA–584 and antidumping duty 

investigation No. 731–TA–1382 

(Preliminary). 

Notice of the institution of the 

Commission’s investigations and of a 

public conference to be held in 

connection therewith was given by 

posting copies of the notice in the Office 

of the Secretary, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 

and by publishing the notice in the 

Federal Register of August 15, 2017 (82 

FR 38707). The conference was held in 

Washington, DC, on August 30, 2017, 

and all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to sections 

703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1671b(a) and 1673b(a)). It completed 

and filed its determinations in these 

investigations on September 25, 2017. 

The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 4732 

(October 2017), entitled Uncoated 

Groundwood Paper from Canada: 

Investigation Nos. 701–TA–584 and 

731–1382 (Preliminary). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 25, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–20878 Filed 9–28–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1035] 

Certain Liquid Crystal Ewriters and 

Components Thereof; Commission 

Final Determination of Violation of 

Section 337; Termination of 

Investigation; Issuance of Limited 

Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist 

Order 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has found a violation of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in 

the above-captioned investigation. The 

Commission has determined to issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist order. The investigation is 

terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2301. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at https://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on January 13, 2017, based on a 

complaint filed by Kent Displays, Inc. of 

Kent, Ohio (‘‘Kent Displays’’). 82 FR 

4418. The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 

337’’), in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain liquid 

crystal eWriters and components thereof 

that infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 7,351,506 

(‘‘the ’506 patent’’) and 8,947,604 (‘‘the 

’604 patent’’). Id. The Commission’s 

notice of investigation named as 

respondents Shenzhen Howshow 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES