alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11
                    HEALTHCOR HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                UNAUDITED NET INCOME PER COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED                   NINE MONTHS ENDED
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                            SEPTEMBER 30,                        SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                               ------------------------------       -------------------------------
                                                                  1998               1997               1998               1997
                                                               -----------       ------------       ------------       ------------
<S>                                                            <C>               <C>                <C>                <C>          
Net income (loss) .......................................      $(9,882,685)      $ (1,292,574)      $(34,086,033)      $   (235,181)
                                                               ===========       ============       ============       ============
Shares:
   Weighted average common shares issued ................       10,095,180         10,064,000         10,093,389         10,042,957
   Assuming exercise of options, reduced by the
     number of common shares which could have
     been purchased with the proceeds from
     exercise of such options ...........................             --               95,210               --                 --
                                                               -----------       ------------       ------------       ------------
   Weighted average number of common shares
     Outstanding, as adjusted ...........................       10,095,180         10,159,210         10,093,389         10,042,957
                                                               ===========       ============       ============       ============
Net income (loss) per common share - basic ..............      $      (.98)      $       0.13       $      (3.38)      $      (0.02)
                                                               ===========       ============       ============       ============
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted ............      $      (.98)      $       0.13       $      (3.38)      $      (0.02)
                                                               ===========       ============       ============       ============

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2019

izm 

# Order

Clerk July 31, 2019

159928 (57)

SIMMONS PROPERTIES, LLC,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

- Appellant,

v SC: 159928

COA: 346657

Ingham CC: 18

- 000474

- CK

LANSING ENTERTAINMENT AND PUBLIC

FACILITIES AUTHORITY,

Defendant/Counterplaintiff

- Appellee.

___________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the plaintiff

- appellant to co ntinue stay

is DENIED as moot. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(I), “[w]hen a stay bond has been filed on

appeal to the Court of Appeals under MCR 7.209 or a stay has been entered or takes effect

pursuant to MCR 7.209(E)(7), it operates to st ay proceedings pending disposition of the

appeal in the Supreme Court unless otherwise ordered by the Supreme C ourt or the Court

of Appeals.” The Court of Appeals entered a stay pending appeal on December 7, 2018,

which remains in effect without further or der by this Court.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02
- 17
- 00078
- CR

BRANDON P. KELLEY APPELLANT

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 371ST DISTR ICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1488 594R

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Brandon P. Kelley pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm in exchange for two years’ confinement and now attempts to appeal this conviction. On March 14, 2017, we notified Appellant that the trial court’s certification of his right to appeal states that this is a plea

- bargain case , that he has no right of appeal, and that he waived his right of appeal, and we informed

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

him that unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the
court, on or before March 24, 2017 , a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, the appeal would be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P . 25.2(a)(2), (d),

44.3. We then granted Appellant two extensions to file a response and denied his third extension but ultimately gave Appellant until July 10, 2017, to file a response showing grounds for con tinuing the appeal. Because Appellant has not shown grounds for continuing the appeal, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth BONNIE SUDDERTH JUSTICE
PANEL: SUDDERTH, KERR, and PITTMAN, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2( b)

DELIVERED: July 27, 2017
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . A copy of the agreement is available through the Commission's Web site (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     012067-021.                

*Title:*                     U.S. Supplemental Agreement to the HLC Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     BBC Chartering Carriers GmbH & Co. KG and BBC Chartering & Logistics GmbH & Co. KG (acting as a single party); Hanssy Shipping Pte. Ltd.; and Industrial Maritime Carriers, L.L.C.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wade S. Hooker, Attorney; 211 Central Park W; New York, NY 10024.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment deletes Rickmers-Linie GmbH & Cie. KG as a party to the U.S. Supplemental Agreement and to delete NPC Projects A/S and Rickmers-Linie GmbH & Cie. KG as a joint party to the HLC Agreement.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: September 22, 2017.

Rachel E. Dickon,

 Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-20685 Filed 9-26-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3009 

To amend the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 

to require that any new national wildlife refuge may not be established 

except as expressly authorized by statute. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2011 

Mr. FLEMING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 to require that any new national wildlife 

refuge may not be established except as expressly authorized by statute. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Wildlife Ref5 uge Review Act of 2011’’. 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3009 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW NA2 TIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4(a) of the National Wild4 life Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 

5 668dd(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(6) The Secretary may not establish any national 

7 wildlife refuge except as expressly authorized by a law en8 acted after September 30, 2011.’’. 

9 (b) EXISTING REFUGES NOT AFFECTED.—The 

10 amendment made by subsection (a) shall not apply with 

11 respect to any national wildlife refuge established on or 

12 before September 30, 2011. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         657,553
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               41,940,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                (1,066,446)
<INVENTORY>                                 10,350,463
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,036,770
<PP&E>                                     111,762,128
<DEPRECIATION>                             (13,621,397)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             194,757,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,285,762
<BONDS>                                     59,747,292
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,477
<OTHER-SE>                                  91,952,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               194,757,531
<SALES>                                     44,260,376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,260,376
<CGS>                                       34,629,943
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,629,943
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,792,142
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (73,424)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,250,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,779,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,043,865
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,735,629
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                939,675
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   795,954
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10148]

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition “David Hockney,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to an agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about November 21, 2017, until on or about February 25, 2018, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of the imported objects, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 11, 2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Alyson Grunder,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2017-20960 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
CIRCUIT COURT OF NOTTOWAY COUNTY

#### David Scott Gouldthorpe v. Commonwealth of Virginia P & G Oil Co., Inc. v. Commonwealth of Virginia

February 10, 1986

By JUDGE THOMAS V. WARREN

These cases are before the Court on the defendant’s Plea of Sovereign Immunity after the oral argument February 6. The facts, for the purpose of the plea, are simple. Plaintiffs’ injuries occurred April 9, 1984. Notices under the Virginia Tort Claims Act were filed with the Office of the Attorney General March 25, 1985. In 1984, effective July 1, 1984, Sections 8.01-195.6 and 8.01-195.7 of the Virginia Tort Claims Act were amended to provide twelve months in which to file a claim rather than six months.

I can perceive no distinction between this case and the line of Workman’s Compensation cases holding that when a statute creates rights and remedies, the limitation is part of the right and a condition precedent to maintenance of the claim. *Barksdale v. H. O. Engen, Inc., et al.,*218 Va. 496 (1977). Since the right to bring an action vested April 9, 1984, it is my opinion that this limitation has no retrospective application and an action became forever barred October 9, 1984.

Since the limitation question is dispositive of the case the other matters need not be decided.
```

[United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions (Plum Book), 1996]
[Independent Agencies and Government Corporations]
[Commission on Civil Rights]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

The Plum Book (United States Government Policy
        and Supporting Positions): 1996 EditionBRANCH: EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTSLocationPosition TitleName of IncumbentPay PlanType of Appt.Level Grade or PayTenureExpires**COMMISSIONERS***Commissioners*Washington, DCChairmanMary F. BerryEXPAIV..........02/02/1999Los Angeles, CAVice-ChairmanCruz ReynosoEXPAIV..................Middlesex, MACommissionerA. L. HigginbothamEXXSIV..................Washington, DCCommissionerConstance HornerEXPAIV..................Philadelphia, PACommissionerRussell G. RedenbaughEXXSIV..................San Francisco, CACommissionerYvonne Y. LeeEXXSIV..................Princeton, NJCommissionerRobert P. GeorgeEXPAIV..................Washington, DCCommissionerCarl A. AndersonEXXSIV..................*Commissioner's Assistants*Washington, DCSpecial AssistantJoseph BroadusGSSC11..................Washington, DCSpecial Assistant To the CommissionerKrishna ToolsieGSSC13..................Washington, DCSpecial AssistantAderson B. FrancoisGSSC13..................Washington, DCSpecial AssistantCynthia A. ValenzuelaGSSC11..................Washington, DCSpecial AssistantDeeana JangGSSC13..................Washington, DCSpecial AssistantWilliam L. SaundersGSSC13..................Washington, DCSpecial AssistantCharlotte M. PonticelliGSSC13..................**OFFICE OF THE STAFF DIRECTOR**Washington, DCStaff DirectorMary K. MathewsESPA............................Washington, DCDeputy Staff Director VacantES......................................Washington, DCExecutive Assistant to the Staff Director VacantES......................................Washington, DCSpecial AssistantJacqueline L. JohnsonGSSC14..................*Congressional Affairs Unit*Washington, DCAssistant Staff Director for Congressional AffairsJames S. CunninghamESCA............................*Office of Civil Rights Evaluation*Washington, DCAssistant Staff Director for Civil Rights EvalFrederick L. IslerESCA............................*Office of the General Counsel*Washington, DCGeneral CounselStephanie Y. MooreESNA............................
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PETER JAMES LITTLE, AKA Peter Little, 

AKA Peter J. Little, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

CHARLES L. RYAN, named as: Charles 

Ryan, Director of A.D.C. at 1601 W. 

Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85007;

UNKNOWN RADECKI, Mr./ Director or 

A.C.I. for A.D.C. at 1601 E. Jefferson St., 

Phoenix, AZ 85007,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 14-15690 

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02512-FJM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 11, 2017

**

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Peter James Little appeals from the district court’s 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 18 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-15690 

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations in 

connection with his prison employment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We affirm.

Little forfeited his opportunity to appeal the denial of his motions to amend 

because he did not file any objections to the magistrate judge’s orders. See 

Bastidas v. Chappell, 791 F.3d 1155, 1159 (9th Cir. 2015) (“[A] party who fails to 

file timely objections to a magistrate judge’s nondispositive order with the district 

judge to whom the case is assigned forfeits its right to appellate review of that 

order.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Anderson v. 

Woodcreek Venture Ltd., 351 F.3d 911, 917 (9th Cir. 2003) (motion for leave to 

amend a complaint is a nondispositive order).

Because we affirm, Little’s request to order reassignment to a different judge 

on remand, set forth in his replacement opening brief, is denied.

Little’s request to dismiss the portions of his appeal addressing entry of 

summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 60) is granted.

Little’s request for oral argument (Docket Entry No. 60) is denied.

AFFIRMED.
#### Elvis MINAYA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF NEW YORK and Regina Loughran, in her individual capacity and as an aider and abettor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-4107-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 27, 2008.

Ambrose Wotorson, Law Office of Ambrose Wotorson, Brooklyn, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Drake A. Colley, Assistant Corporation Counsel (Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, and Edward F.X. Hart, on the brief), New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees.

PRESENT: Hon. CHESTER J. STRAUB, Hon. REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judges, Hon. WILLIAM K. SESSIONS III, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable William K. Sessions III, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation.

*876SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Elvis Minaya appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Frederic Block, *Judge),*granting the motion of Defendants-Appellees Board of Education of the City of New York and Regina Loughran for summary judgment dismissal under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and the record of prior proceedings.

Minaya appeals only that portion of the District Court’s opinion that granted summary judgment to defendants-appellees with respect to Minaya’s claim of discriminatory discharge. “We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, examining the evidence in the light most favorable to, and drawing all inferences in favor of, the nonmovant.” *Blackman v. New York City Transit Auth.,*491 F.3d 95, 98 (2d Cir.2007). We have considered plaintiff-appellant’s arguments and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, for substantially the reasons set forth in the District Court’s decision, *see Minaya v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of N.Y.,*No. 03 CV 1988, 2006 WL 2224471 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2006), the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         188,724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,113,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                   129,000
<INVENTORY>                                    100,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,346,671
<PP&E>                                       1,963,101
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,412,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,356,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,879,542
<BONDS>                                      1,592,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,948
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           320
<OTHER-SE>                                   (119,395)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,356,343
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,066,127
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,698,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (60,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             880,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,618,476)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,618,476)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,618,476)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.72)
        

</TABLE>