alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3383-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Virgin Islands; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-3383-EM), dated 
September 5, 2017, and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 18, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective September 7, 2017.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-20453 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3197 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Spokane, 

Washington, as the ‘‘Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs 

Medical Center’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 13, 2011 

Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 

in Spokane, Washington, as the ‘‘Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 MEDICAL CENTER, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON. 

5 The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 

6 in Spokane, Washington, shall after the date of the enact7 ment of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Mann8 Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Cen9 ter’’. Any reference to such medical center in any law, regVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:08 Oct 15, 2011 Jkt 019060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3197.IH H3197

PWALKER on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3197 IH

1 ulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the 

2 United States shall be considered to be a reference to the 

3 Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

4 Center. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 45025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20600]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 11, 2017.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments 
can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#074677776b6e6466736e6869742944686a6a626973744766736b2961756529687560"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f3b283839f9a9092879a9c9d80ddb09c9e9e969d8780b392879fdd958191dd9c8194">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Susan C. Patout, the Patout Family Voting Trust, the estate of 
William S. Patout III, and Susan C. Patout acting in her capacity as 
trustee of the trust and as executrix of the estate, all of Franklin, 
Louisiana; to acquire and also retain shares of Jeanerette First 
National Bancorp, Inc., Jeanerette, Louisiana, and thereby join the 
existing Patout family group previously approved to own shares of 
Jeanerette First National Bancorp, Inc., which is the parent holding 
company of The First National Bank of Jeanerette, Jeanerette, 
Louisiana.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Arnold G. Leng Revocable Trust, Susan Leng Irrevocable Trust, 
and Arnold G. Leng, as trustee of both trusts, all of Primghar, Iowa; 
Steve Leng and Kathy Leng, both of Hartley, Iowa; Jean Triplett and 
Darryl Triplett, both of Primghar, Iowa; Mary Thomson and Jim Thomson, 
both of Primghar, Iowa; and Jan Westergard and Mark Westergard, both of 
Omaha, Nebraska; to join the Leng Family Control Group and acquire 
voting shares of Capital Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly 
acquire shares of Savings Bank, both in Primghar, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 21, 
2017.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-20600 Filed 9-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 18**

 

December 29, 2004

 

 

The Board of Directors

Gardenburger, Inc.:

 

As stated in Note 3 to the financial statements of Gardenburger, Inc.(the “Company”) for the year ended September 30, 2004, the Company changed itsmethod of accounting for slotting fees under FASB’s EITF 01-09 and the newlyadopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances becauseslotting fees had been recorded as a prepaid asset and the related expense wasrecognized ratably over a 12-month period beginning two months after theproduct was shipped; however, given that there are no written contractualcommitments requiring the retail grocers to allocate shelf space for twelvemonths, the Company determined that it was a preferable accounting method toexpense the slotting fees at the time the related revenue is recognized.Effective October 1, 2003, the Company now recognizes slotting fees as areduction of net sales in the period the related revenue is recognized. Inconnection with our audit of the above mentioned financial statements, we haveevaluated the circumstances and the business judgment and planning whichformulated your basis to make the change in accounting principle.

 

It should be understood that criteria have not been established by theFinancial Accounting Standards Board for selecting from among the alternativeaccounting principles that exist in this area. Further, the American Instituteof Certified Public Accountants has not established the standards by which anauditor can evaluate the preferability of one accounting principle among aseries of alternatives. However, for purposes of the Company’s compliance withthe requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishingthis letter.

 

Based on our audit, we concur with management’s judgment that the newlyadopted accounting principle described in Note 3 is preferable in thecircumstances. In formulating this position, we are relying on management’sbusiness planning and judgment, which we do not find to be unreasonable.

 
| Very truly yours,    |   |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------|
|                 |   |   |
| /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP |   |   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

              Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
                                December 31, 2002


The  undersigned  directors of the following  companies (each  respectively  the
"Company")

        Company                                     State of Incorporation
  AEP Generating Company                                      Ohio
  Appalachian Power Company                                 Virginia
  AEP Texas Central Company                                  Texas
  AEP Texas North Company                                    Texas
  Columbus Southern Power Company                             Ohio
  Kentucky Power Company                                    Kentucky
  Ohio Power Company                                          Ohio
  Public Service Company of Oklahoma                        Oklahoma
  Southwestern Electric Power Company                       Delaware

do hereby constitute and appoint E. LINN DRAPER,  JR., ARMANDO A. PENA and SUSAN
TOMASKY,  and each of them, their  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, to execute for
them,  and in their names,  and in any and all of their  capacities,  the Annual
Report of the  Company on Form 10-K,  pursuant  to Section 13 of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934,  for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2002, and any and
all  amendments  thereto,  and to file the same,  with all exhibits  thereto and
other  documents  in  connection  therewith,  with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission,  granting unto said  attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and  authority  to do and  perform  every act and thing  required  or
necessary to be done,  as fully to all intents and  purposes as the  undersigned
might or could do in  person,  hereby  ratifying  and  confirming  all that said
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or any of them,  may  lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned have signed these presents this 26th day of
February, 2003.


   /s/ E. Linn Draper, Jr.                        /s/ Robert P. Powers
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
E. Linn Draper, Jr.                             Robert P. Powers


   /s/ Henry W. Fayne                              /s/ Thomas V. Shockley, III
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
Henry W. Fayne                                  Thomas V. Shockley, III


   /s/ Thomas M. Hagan                             /s/ Susan Tomasky
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
Thomas M. Hagan                                 Susan Tomasky


   /s/ Armando A. Pena
--------------------------------
Armando A. Pena
#### E.J. WILSON, et al., Dearest Davis, et al., and Cassandra Linder, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Roland ATTAWAY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 83-8237.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 9, 1985.

Brian Spears, Atlanta, Ga., Ralph Goldberg, Atlanta, Ga., John Carroll, Montgomery, Ala., Floyd Mincey, Dublin, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

W.W. Larsen, Dublin, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 16, 1985, 11 Cir., 1985, 757 F.2d 1227).

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, CLARK, Circuit Judge, and THOMAS *, District Judge.

*

 Honorable Daniel H. Thomas, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.

GODBOLD, Chief Judge:

We agree with the contention made by appellants in their petition for rehearing that they did include in their various directed verdict motions the matter of sufficiency of the evidence relating to constitutionality of arrests of appellants Snell, Rouse, Horton, Davis, Linder, Martin and Wilson. The standard of review of sufficiency is, therefore, the familiar standard of *Boeing Company v. Shipman,*411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969) (en banc). We have reexamined the evidence under this standard, and we reach the same conclusions as before. There was sufficient evidence to submit to the jury the issue of the constitutionality of the arrests of Horton, Snell, Rouse, Martin and Wilson. There was not sufficient evidence to submit to the jury the issue of the constitutionality of the arrests of Davis and Linder; judgment n.o.v. should have been entered with respect to them.

Except as set out in this order, the petition for rehearing is DENIED. No mem*1412ber of this panel nor other judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 26), the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ UMBANET, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

EPSILON DATA MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2017

- 2556

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:16

- cv

- 00682

- JRG, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

B RIAN B ECK , Spence, P.C., Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by W ILLIAM C ORY S PENCE

.

P RATIK A. S HAH , Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant

- appelle e. Also represented by Z E

- WEN J ULIUS C HEN ; C HARLES E VERINGHAM , IV , Longview, TX.

______________________T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, O’M ALLEY and S TOLL , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 10, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephan Kiratsous, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 of Delphi Financial Group, Inc.;
and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2012



/s/ STEPHAN KIRATSOUSStephan KiratsousExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit      32.2**

| a)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or                78o(d)); and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the                Report. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November 17, 2006  | /s/ William C.                Gray  |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Dated              | William C.                Gray           |
|    |                                                                                                                     |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the annual report on Form 10-K of SEACOR Holdings Inc.; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|                       |
|-----------------------|
|                       |  |  |
| Date:                 | May 1, 2017 |
|                  |
| /s/ CHARLES FABRIKANT |
| Name:                 | Charles Fabrikant |
| Title:                | Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1997 and the Statement of Operations for
the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statemetns.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,123
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,031
<PP&E>                                       2,418,082
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,798,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 770,617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              116
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     770,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   770,617
<SALES>                                      1,190,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,199,005
<CGS>                                          655,370
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  655,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               198,088
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                345,547
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            345,547
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   345,547
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    47.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    47.33
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6465

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. TIMOTHY O. BENNETT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00006-LHT-DLH-1; 2:07-cv-00020-LHT) Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: July 3, 2008 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy O. Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Corey F. Ellis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.-2- PER CURIAM: Timothy O. Bennett moves for a certificate of appealability, seeking to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bennett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT
 
                             AVANIR PHARMACEUTICALS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-49082 on Form S-1; Registration Statement No. 33-71276 on Form S-8;
Registration Statement No. 33-94370 on Form S-8; Registration Statement No.
33-76094 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-64983 on Form S-3 and
Registration Statement No. 333-24549 on Form S-3 of AVANIR Pharmaceuticals,
formerly LIDAK Pharmaceuticals (a development stage enterprise) of our report
dated December 24, 1998 which report contains explanatory paragraphs referring
to: the status of the Company as a development stage enterprise, the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern, and the Company as a defendant in
certain lawsuits, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AVANIR
Pharmaceuticals for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
San Diego, California
January 4, 1999