alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13(a)

906 Certification

The certification set
forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Richard Solomons, the Chief Executive
Officer, and Paul Edgecliffe-Johnson, the Chief Financial Officer of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 25, 2015



By:

/s/ Richard SolomonsName: Richard SolomonsTitle: Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Paul Edgecliffe-JohnsonName: Paul Edgecliffe-JohnsonTitle: Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11216 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CURTIS RAY DUPREE,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CR-167-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 17, 1997

Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Curtis Ray Dupree appeals his guilty-plea convictions for

aiding and abetting and bank robbery on the ground that the

district court erred in finding that his prior criminal

convictions were not “related” under the Sentencing Guidelines.

The guilty plea Dupree entered into with the Government contained

a waiver-of-appeal provision whereby Dupree waived his right to
No. 96-11216

- 2 -

appeal his sentence except as to an upward departure. We have

reviewed the briefs and the record and conclude that the waiver

was informed and voluntary and is therefore binding on Dupree. 

See United States v. Melancon, 972 F.3d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992).

His appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because

the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
**Exhibit****31.1**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, James
A. Coyne, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of PLM Equipment Growth Fund
V.
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this annual report.
 
 4.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 
 a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  disclosed
in this annual report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
 
 
 
 
 
 Date:
March 29, 2005  By:  /s/
James A. Coyne
 James A.
Coyne
 President
 (Principal
Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2660 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2660

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  122 North Holderrieth Boulevard in Tomball, Texas, as the ``Tomball 
                         Veterans Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TOMBALL VETERANS POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 122 North Holderrieth Boulevard in Tomball, Texas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Tomball Veterans Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tomball 
Veterans Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of AVANIR Pharmaceuticals (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gerald J. Yakatan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                    /s/ Gerald J. Yakatan, Ph.D.
                  --------------------------------
                  Gerald J. Yakatan, Ph.D.
                  Chief Executive Officer

December 13, 2004
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3288 

To authorize the President to remove commercial satellites and related components from the United States Munitions List subject to certain restrictions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2011 

Mr. BERMAN (for himself, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. 

COFFMAN of Colorado, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. 

CONNOLLY of Virginia, Mr. CHAFFETZ, and Mr. HEINRICH) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the President to remove commercial satellites 

and related components from the United States Munitions List subject to certain restrictions, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safeguarding United 

5 States Satellite Leadership and Security Act of 2011’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3288 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO REMOVE SATELLITES AND RELATED 

2 COMPONENTS FROM THE UNITED STATES 

3 MUNITIONS LIST. 

4 Subject to section 5, the President is authorized to 

5 remove commercial satellites and related components from 

6 the United States Munitions List, consistent with the pro7 cedures in section 38(f) of the Arms Export Control Act 

8 (22 U.S.C. 2778(f)). 

9 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON SATELLITE SALES TO THE PEO10 PLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 

11 No satellite or related component may be transferred 

12 to, directly or indirectly, or launched into outer space by, 

13 the Government of the People’s Republic of China or any 

14 entity or person of the People’s Republic of China. 

15 SEC. 4. PROHIBITION ON SATELLITE SALES TO STATE 

16 SPONSORS OF TERRORISM AND NORTH 

17 KOREA. 

18 No satellite or related component may be transferred 

19 to, directly or indirectly, or launched into outer space by, 

20 the Government of Cuba, Iran, Sudan, Syria, or North 

21 Korea or any entity or person of Cuba, Iran, Sudan, Syria, 

22 or North Korea. 

23 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

24 The President may not exercise the authority pro25 vided in section 2 of this Act before— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3288 IH

1 (1) the date that is 90 days after the date of 

2 the enactment of this Act, 

3 (2) the date on which the President submits to 

4 Congress a determination that the transfer of com5 mercial satellites from the United States Munitions 

6 List does not pose an unacceptable risk to the na7 tional security of the United States, or 

8 (3) the date on which the President submits to 

9 Congress a report regarding the risk-mitigating li10 censing controls, procedures, and safeguards the 

11 President will put in place to reduce such risk to an 

12 absolute minimum, 

13 whichever occurs last. 

14 SEC. 6. DEFINITION. 

15 In this Act, the term ‘‘United States Munitions List’’ 

16 means the list referred to in section 38(a)(1) of the Arms 

17 Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778(a)(1)). 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3182 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 222 West 7th Avenue 

in Anchorage, Alaska, as the ‘‘James M. Fitzgerald United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 13, 2011 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 222 

West 7th Avenue in Anchorage, Alaska, as the ‘‘James 

M. Fitzgerald United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse located at 222 West 

5 7th Avenue in Anchorage, Alaska, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘James M. Fitzgerald United States Court7 house’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 3182 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘James M. Fitzgerald United 

6 States Courthouse’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3307 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the renewable 

energy credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2011 

Mr. REICHERT (for himself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. KING of 

Iowa, Mr. LATHAM, Mr. DOLD, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, 

Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. BOSWELL, and Mr. THOMPSON of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the renewable energy credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Renewable 

5 Energy Production Tax Credit Extension Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY CREDIT. 

7 (a) WIND.—Paragraph (1) of section 45(d) of the In8 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘Jan9 uary 1, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2017’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3307 IH

1 (b) BIOMASS, GEOTHERMAL, SMALL IRRIGATION, 

2 LANDFILL GAS, TRASH, AND HYDROPOWER.—Each of 

3 the following provisions of section 45(d) of such Code is 

4 amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 2014’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘January 1, 2017’’: 

6 (1) Clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph (2)(A). 

7 (2) Clauses (i)(I) and (ii) of paragraph (3)(A). 

8 (3) Paragraph (4). 

9 (4) Paragraph (6). 

10 (5) Paragraph (7). 

11 (6) Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph 

12 (9). 

13 (7) Subparagraph (B) of paragraph (11). 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND]
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 43 THROUGH 46 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
[/LEGEND]
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          MAR-31-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-2000
[CASH]                                          28,835
[SECURITIES]                                    40,000
[RECEIVABLES]                                      910
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                    755,025
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               245,953
[PP&E]                                         123,680
[DEPRECIATION]                                  28,377
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               1,166,026
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                        1,201,591
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                         8,111
[OTHER-SE]                                    (43,676)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 1,166,026
[SALES]                                        596,055
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               596,055
[CGS]                                          505,003
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        2
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                               9,194
[INCOME-PRETAX]                            (2,175,595)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                        (2,175,595)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                               (2,175,595)
[EPS-BASIC]                                      (.27)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                    (.27)
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45832-45833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21107]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant an Exclusive License; Radco Industries, 
Inc.

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of intent to grant license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to Radco Industries, Inc., 700 Kingsland Drive, Batavia, IL 
60510, a revocable, nonassignable, exclusive license to practice the 
Government-Owned invention described in U.S. Patent number 8,865,636 
entitled ``Paint Stripping Compositions'' inventors Han et al.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Naval Air 
Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Technology Transfer Office, Attention 
Michelle Miedzinski, Code 5.0H, 22347 Cedar Point Road, Building 2185, 
Box 62, Room 2160,

[[Page 45833]]

Patuxent River, Maryland 20670. File an electronic copy of objection 
with <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f09d999398959c9c95de9d9995948a999e839b99b09e918689de9d999c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f4999d979c91989891da999d91908e9d9a879f9db49a95828dda999d98">[email protected]</span></a>.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license has 
fifteen (15) days from the publication date of this notice to file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any.

FOR FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Miedzinski, 301-342-1133, 
Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, 22347 Cedar Point Road, 
Building 2185, Box 62, Room 2160, Patuxent River, Maryland 20670, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3dedad0dbd6dfdfd69ddedad6d7c9daddc0d8daf3ddd2c5ca9ddedadf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="55383c363d303939307b383c30312f3c3b263e3c153b34232c7b383c39">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

    Dated: September 26, 2017.
A.M. Nichols,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-21107 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST CIRCUIT

2022 CA 1248' 

C I 

CONTI ENTERPRISES, INC. 

VERSUS

PROVIDENCE/GSE ASSOCIATES, LLC, ROBERT E. WILLIAMS, JR., 

AND ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Judgment rendered: Noy 0 12023

On Appeal from the

32°d Judicial District Court

Terrebonne Parish

State of Louisiana

No. 1743 S5

Judge Randall L. Bethancourt, Presiding

Stephen P. Hall Attorneys for Appellee/Defendant

Phelps Dunbar, LLP XL Specialty Insurance Company

New Orleans, Louisiana

Adrian. G. Nadeau

J. Weston Clark

Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Brian J. Marceaux

Julius P. Hebert, Jr. 

Derick A. Bercegeay

Brianna Wilson Orgeron

Houma, Louisiana

Attorneys for Appellees/Defendants

Hartman Engineering, Inc. and

Jared Monceaux

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellant

Terrebonne Parish Consolidated

Government

BEFORE: THERIOT, HOLDRIDGE, AND HESTER, JJ. 

We note that 2022 -CA -1249, Conti Enterprises, Inc. vs. Providence/GSE Associates, LLC, 

is consolidated with 2022 -CA -1248, Conti Enterprises, Inc. vs. Providence/GSE Associates, 

LLC, for oral argument and submission. 
HOLDRIDGE, J. 

In this appeal, Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government ( TPCG) 

challenges a trial court' s judgment granting a motion for summary judgment filed

by XL Specialty Insurance Company ( XLSIC), the alleged professional insurer of

Hartman Engineering, Inc. and Jared Monceaux. In Conti Enterprises, Inc. v. 

Providence Associates, LLC, 2022- 1249 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 10/ 30/ 23), 2023 WL

7125055 ( unpublished), this court upheld a summary judgment dismissing all of

TPCG' s claims against Hartman Engineering, Inc. and Mr. Monceaux on the basis

that TPCG' s claims against those defendants were statutorily perempted. By the

extension and operation of law, peremption is a defense that is not personal to the

insured and is available to the insured' s liability insurer. See Shields v. Alvin R. 

Savoie & Associates, Inc., 2016- 0827 ( La. App. 1 Cir 2117117), 217 So.3d 420, 

421; Vicari v. Window World, Inc., 14- 870 ( La. App. 5 Cir. 5128115), 171 So.3d

425, writ denied, 2015- 1269 ( La. 9125115), 179 So.3d 570. Because XLSIC' s

insureds can have no liability to TPCG as a matter of law, XLSIC cannot be held

liable to TPCG as the professional liability insurer of Hartman Engineering, Inc. 

and Mr. Monceaux. Therefore, the trial court correctly entered summary judgment

dismissing all claims asserted by TPCG against XLSIC in this litigation. 

For these reasons, we affirm the trial court' s summary judgment in favor of

XL Specialty Insurance Company. All costs of this appeal, in the amount of

35, 108. 50, are taxed to appellant, Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government. 

AFFIRMED. 

2