alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2943 

AN ACT 

To extend the program of block grants to States for temporary assistance for needy families and related programs through December 31, 2011. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2943 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Short-Term TANF 

3 Extension Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR 

5 NEEDY FAMILIES PROGRAM AND RELATED 

6 PROGRAMS THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2011. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Activities authorized by part A of 

8 title IV and section 1108(b) of the Social Security Act 

9 (other than under subsections (a)(3) and (b) of section 

10 403 of such Act) shall continue through December 31, 

11 2011, in the manner authorized for fiscal year 2011, and 

12 out of any money in the Treasury of the United States 

13 not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appropriated 

14 such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. Grants 

15 and payments may be made pursuant to this authority on 

16 a quarterly basis through the first quarter of fiscal year 

17 2012 at the level provided for such activities for the cor18 responding quarter of fiscal year 2011. 

19 (b) MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT.—Section 409(a)(7) 

20 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 609(a)(7)) is amend21 ed— 

22 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or 2012’’ 

23 and inserting ‘‘2012, or 2013’’; and 

24 (2) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking ‘‘2011’’ 

25 and inserting ‘‘2012’’. 
3 

•HR 2943 EH

1 SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

2 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

3 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

4 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

5 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

6 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

7 by the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, pro8 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

9 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2943 

AN ACT 

To extend the program of block grants to States for 

lated programs through December 31, 2011. temporary assistance for needy families and re-
NO. 07-09-0083-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MARCH 13, 2009

______________________________

IN RE ROY JON, RELATOR

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Roy Jon, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks a writ

of mandamus to compel the Lubbock County District Clerk, Barbara Sucsy, to serve the

defendants in cause number 2009-545,901 with citation and complaint filed in the 72nd

District Court of Lubbock County. He alleges the district clerk must also issue affidavits

and written instruments such as “Plaintiff’s Affidavit of In Formal [sic] Pauperis, certified

copy of trust fund statement, Affidavit Relating to Exhaustion of Administrative Grievances

Step 1 and Step 2, and Affidavit Relating to Previous Filed Lawsuit.” For the following

reasons, we deny Relator’s request and dismiss his petition for want of jurisdiction.
2

This Court has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district

or county court in our district and all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Tex. Gov't

Code Ann. § 22.221(b) (Vernon Supp. 2008). In order for a district clerk to fall within our

jurisdictional reach, it must be established that the issuance of the writ of mandamus is

necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692-93

(Tex.App.–San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Relator has no appeal pending in our Court; thus,

he has not demonstrated that the exercise of our mandamus authority against the Lubbock

County District Clerk is appropriate to enforce our jurisdiction. Consequently, we have no

authority to issue a writ of mandamus against Barbara Sucsy.

Additionally, Relator has failed to comply with the applicable rules of procedure.

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3. Specifically, Appellant has not included an appendix to his

petition for writ of mandamus containing certified or sworn copies of the documents he

references in his petition. The fact that Relator is proceeding pro se does not excuse him

from complying with rules of procedure. See Wheeler v. Green, 157 S.W.3d 439, 444

(Tex. 2005); Holt v. F.F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756, 759 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1998, pet.

denied).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                      17,086,000
<SECURITIES>                                 6,628,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,316,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   652,000
<INVENTORY>                                 65,697,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            98,521,000
<PP&E>                                      11,119,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,241,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             119,055,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       75,035,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,518,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               119,055,000
<SALES>                                    106,555,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           106,555,000
<CGS>                                       93,906,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               93,906,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            20,232,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,137,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,720,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   890,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,835,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                               7,775,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,835,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         903
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,058
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,568
<PP&E>                                         6,330
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,917
<BONDS>                                        578
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    6
<COMMON>                                       42
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,610
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,091
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,141
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                257
<INCOME-TAX>                                   103
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            154
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   154
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.03
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


 


 


POP G FOOD HOLDINGS CORP.


10990 Wilshire Boulevard


Penthouse


Los Angeles, CA 90024


 


April 24, 2018


 


 


Mr. Mark H. DeBlois


Chairman and CEO


Specialty Brands Holdings, LLC


600 Providence Highway


Dedham, MA 02026


 


Dear Mr. DeBlois


 


Reference is made to tehr
letter of intent, dated February 14, 2018 (the “LOI”) entered into among Specialty Brands Holdings, LLC (“SBH”),
Papa Gino’s Inc., Oreva Capital Corp. (“Oreva”), Barington/Hilco Acquisition Corporation (“BHAC”)
and Pop G Food Holdings Corp. ( “Holdings”).


 


As we have discussed, based on our financial
review of the business of the “Company Group” (as defined in the LOI) we have determined that payment of the purchase
price set forth in the LOI was not in the best interests of either Holdings, BHAC or their affiliates. Although we have proposed
payment of a reduced purchase price SBH has chosen not to accept our proposal. Accordingly, please consider this letter as the
official termination of the LOI and our discussion with respect to the matters described therein.


 


We wish you well in your future endeavors.


 


Very truly hours,


 


POP G FOOD HOLDINGS CORP.


 


 


 


By: /s/ Adam E. Levin                


Name: Adam E. Levin


Title: Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2944 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                       October 6, 2011.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
2944) entitled ``An Act to provide for the continued performance of the 
functions of the United States Parole Commission, and for other 
purposes.'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            On page 2, line 12, strike ```27 years' or `27-year 
      period''' and insert ```26 years' or `26-year period'''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H.R. 2944

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
Sunoco Partners LLC Independent Director Compensation Summary Sheet



 Exhibit 10.16 

 
 Sunoco Partners LLC 

Independent Director Compensation Summary Sheet 
 for 2011 
  
 Directors who are employees of Sunoco Partners LLC or its affiliates receive no additional compensation for service on the general partner’s board of directors or any committees of the board. The
table below summarizes the 2011 compensation program for independent directors of Sunoco Partners LLC. 
  

2011 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY 

 

							
	 Component
	  	Amount ($)	  	Medium of Payment (1)	  	Timing of Payment (2)
				
	 Annual Retainer
	  	$44,000 per year	  	Restricted Units	  	$11,000 credited quarterly
				
		  	$66,000 per year	  	Cash	  	$16,500 paid quarterly
				
	 Presiding Director Chair Retainer
	  	$5,000 per year	  	Cash	  	$1,250 paid quarterly
				
	 Audit Committee Chair Retainer
	  	$6,000 per year	  	Cash	  	$1,500 paid quarterly
				
	 Conflicts Committee Chair Retainer
	  	$2,000 per year	  	Cash	  	$500 paid quarterly
				
	 Compensation Committee Chair Retainer
	  	$3,500 per year	  	Cash	  	$ 875 paid quarterly

  

Notes to table: 
  

	(1)	Pursuant to the Sunoco Partners LLC Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, the portion of the annual retainer paid in the form of Restricted Units is required to
be deferred, and is credited to each independent director’s Mandatory Deferred Compensation Account. In addition, independent directors are permitted to voluntarily defer all or a portion of their cash retainers and fees. Voluntarily deferred
cash compensation amounts are credited in the form of Restricted Units to each independent director’s Voluntary Deferred Compensation Account. 


 

	(2)	The fair market value of each quarterly payment of Restricted Units is calculated using the average of the closing prices of the Partnership’s Units for the ten
trading days prior to the payment date. 

  
 In addition to the foregoing, each independent director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of the board of directors or committees.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ ALBERT BRONT, Petitioner,

v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Respondent.

__________________________ 2012-3121

__________________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. SF0752110583-I-1.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R Albert Bront moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court notes that this petition was dismissed on September 27, 2012 for failure to pay the fee. We treat Mr. Bront’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as a motion to reinstate the petition. Upon consideration thereof, Case: 12-3121 Document: 23 Page: 1 Filed: 01/23/2013ALBERT BRONT v. TREASURY 2 I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. (2) The mandate is recalled, the court’s dismissal order is vacated, and the petition is reinstated. This case will be placed on the next available calendar.

F OR T HE C OURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s21 Case: 12-3121 Document: 23 Page: 2 Filed: 01/23/2013
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 10, 2014

Order 

Clerk

June 10, 2014

149449 (23)

DAVIE LEE JONES, JR., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 149449

COA: 320299

PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF MICHIGAN

and VICTOR A. FRITZ, 

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $11.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$364.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
THE AITQECNEP GENERAL 

UBP TEXAS 

The Honorable H. Q. Sibley 

Executive Director 

Opinion No. H-854 

Texas Animal Health Commission Re: Authority of Texas 

1020 Sam Houston State Office Animal Health Commission 

Building to indemnify owners of 

Austin, Texas 78701 swine infected with 

pseudorabies which have 

been slaughtered on order 

of the Commission. 

Dear Doctor Sibley: 

You have requested our opinion regarding the authority 

of the Texas Animal Health Commission to indemnify owners of 

swine infected with pseudorabies. Article 7014f-1, V.T.C.S., 

authorizes the Commission 

to order swine infected with, or exposed 

to, vesicular exanthema, foot and mouth 

disease, hog cholera and other diseases 

of swine to be sold for immediate slaughter 

at public slaughtering establishments where 

federal post mortem inspection is maintained; 

or the Commission may authorize such slaughter 

upon the owner's property, premises or other 

place under the direction of said Commission. 

Section 22a(4). 

Furthermore, the succeeding subsection provides that 

[a]fter such sale and slaughter of swine 

infected with or exposed to vesicular 

exanthema, foot and mouth disease, and 

hog cholera, the Commission is authorized 

to pay the owner of such swine out of funds 

appropriated by the Legislature for that 

purpose in an amount not to exceed fifty 

p. 3603 
The Honorable H. Q. Sibley - page 2 (M-854 

per cent (50%) of the appraised value of 

such animals after deducting the amount 

of salvage received for them by the 

owner. Section 22a(5). 

You state that pseudorabies is a highly infectious swine 

disease which has been diagnosed in a herd of swine within 

the state. 

If pseudorabies is a swine disease, it comes within the 

provisions of subsection (4), which permits the Commission 

to order the sale and immediate slaughter of swine infected 

with or exposed to "other diseases." The Commission’s 

authority under the indemnification provision, however, is 

limited to those diseases specifically enumerated therein, 

and unlike subsection (4) does not include "other diseases." 

Whether we deal here with legislative oversight or legislative intent is not known to us, but the statute as written 

is clear. 

SUMMARY 

Uner the present wording of the statute, 

the Texas Animal Health Commission is 

authorized to order the sale and immediate slaughter of swine infected with or 

exposed to pseudorabies, but it may not 

indemnify the owner of the swine therefor. 

Very truly yours, 

Attorney General of Texas 

APPROVED: 

Opinion Committee 

jwb 

p. 3604
EXHIBIT
14 - CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR OFFICERS


The
Company’s CEO and CFO hold important and elevated roles in corporate governance.
They are uniquely capable and empowered to ensure that the shareholder’s and
Company’s interests are protected and preserved.




This Code
of Ethics provides principles to which these officers are expected to adhere and
which they are expected to advocate.




This Code
of Ethics has been approved by the Audit Committee.




Any
change to this Code of Ethics and any explicit or implicit waiver from it for
these officers may be made only with the approval of the Audit Committee and
will be appropriately disclosed in accordance with applicable law and
regulations. Violations may subject these officers to disciplinary action
including termination of employment.








The
CEO and CFO will:




1.act with honesty and
integrity, including ethically handling actual or apparent conflicts of interest
between their personal, financial or commercial interests and their
responsibility to the Company;




2.make full, fair, accurate,
timely and understandable disclosure in all reports and documents that the
Company files with or submits to shareholders, government authorities and stock
exchanges or otherwise makes public;




3.act on good faith,
responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting
material facts or allowing their independent judgment to be
subordinated;




4.respect the confidentiality
of information acquired in the course of their work except when authorized or
otherwise legally obligated to disclose and not use such confidential
information for personal advantage;




5.comply with all laws and
regulations applicable to the Company’s businesses and to the Company’s
relationship with its shareholders;




6.report known or suspected
violations of this Code of Ethics to the Audit Committee, and




7.ensure that their actions
comply not only with the letter but the spirit of this Code of Ethics and foster
a culture in which compliance with the law and the Company’s policies is at the
core of the Company’s activities.


































E-1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

      ( print page 44183)    

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Federal Maritime Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

September 20, 2017; 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

800 N. Capitol Street NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

                        The meeting agenda originally published September 18, 2017, 82 FR 43541, is revised to add item 2 in the Open Session. The change was made upon a unanimous vote of the Commission. Parts of this meeting will be open to the public and streamed live at                         *http://fmc.capitolconnection.org/​.*                         The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

## Portions Open to the Public

1. Briefing by Commissioner Dye on the Supply Chain Innovation Teams and Update from Global Liner Shipping Asia Conference.

2. Updates from Acting Chairman Khouri on United States—European Union and United States—United Kingdom Maritime Bilateral Discussions and London International Shipping Week.

3. Staff Briefing on Review Process for Carrier and Marine Terminal Operator Agreements.

## Portions Closed to the Public

1. Staff Update on Petition of the Coalition for Fair Port Practices (P4-16).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Rachel E. Dickon, Assistant Secretary, (202) 523 5725.

Rachel E. Dickon,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-20344 Filed 9-19-17; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P