alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHINA
RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT INC.

    c/o SSC
Mandarin Investment Group Limited

    1402
China Resources Building

    26
Harbour Road, Wanchai

    Hong
Kong

    


    _______________,
2011

    


    SSC
Mandarin Investment Group Limited

    1402
China Resources Building

    26
Harbour Road, Wanchai

    Hong
Kong

    


    Ladies
and Gentlemen:

    


    This letter will confirm our agreement
that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective
Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of
the securities of China Resources Development Inc. (the “Company”)
and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an
initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation of trust account
(in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date
hereinafter referred to as the “Termination
Date”), SSC Mandarin Investment Group Limited shall make available to the
Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may be
required by the Company from time to time, situated at 1402 China Resources
Building, 26 Harbour Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong.  In exchange therefore,
the Company shall pay SSC Mandarin Investment Group Limited the sum of US$10,000
per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the
Termination Date.  SSC Mandarin Investment Group Limited hereby agrees
that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to
any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust
Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the
“Claim”)
and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising
out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not
seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.

    


    
      
        	
                Very
      truly yours,

              
	 
      
	
                CHINA
      RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT INC.

              
	 
      	 
      
	
                By: 

              	 
      
	 
      	
                Name:  Brandon
      Ho

              
	 
      	
                Title:    Vice
      President of Finance

              


      

    

    


    
      
        	
                AGREED
      TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

              
	 
      
	
                SSC
      MANDARIN INVESTMENT GROUP LIMITED

              
	 
      	 
      
	
                By:

              	 
      
	 
      	
                Name:  Robin
      Lee

              
	 
      	
                Title:    Director
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 313 

AN ACT 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify that 

persons who enter into a conspiracy within the United 

States to possess or traffic illegal controlled substances 

outside the United States, or engage in conduct within 

the United States to aid or abet drug trafficking outside 

the United States, may be criminally prosecuted in the 

United States, and for other purposes. 
2 

•HR 313 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drug Trafficking Safe 

5 Harbor Elimination Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES 

7 ACT TO CLARIFY CONSPIRACIES CONDUCTED 

8 WITHIN THE UNITED STATES MAY BE CRIMI9 NALLY PROSECUTED IN THE UNITED STATES. 

10 Section 406 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

11 U.S.C. 846) is amended by— 

12 (1) inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘Any’’; and 

13 (2) inserting at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(b) Whoever, within the United States, conspires 

15 with one or more persons, or aids or abets one or more 

16 persons, regardless of where such other persons are lo17 cated, to engage in conduct at any place outside the 

18 United States that would constitute a violation of this 

19 title, other than a violation of section 404(a), if committed 

20 within the United States, shall be subject to the same pen-
3 

•HR 313 EH

1 alties that would apply to such conduct if it were to occur 

2 within the United States.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 13, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 313 

AN ACT 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify 

United States, and for other purposes. States, may be criminally prosecuted in the aid or abet drug trafficking outside the United engage in conduct within the United States to trolled substances outside the United States, or the United States to possess or traffic illegal conthat persons who enter into a conspiracy within
exv10w27







Exhibit 10.27



January 11, 2011

Charlie T. Piper

[Address]





			
	Re:	 	Confirmation of Terms of Resignation





Dear Charlie:




This letter will confirm our discussions yesterday concerning your resignation from Euronet
Worldwide, Inc. (“Euronet”). We have agreed on the following terms for your resignation:





	 	n 	 	Effective Date: January 10, 2011
	 
	 	n 	 	Payment of Base Salary and bonus: we will pay your base salary for two weeks from the
Effective Date, and a bonus of $100,000 with respect to 2010 performance.
	 
	 	n 	 	Equity Awards: in accordance with our equity plans in place, all outstanding equity
awards will cease to vest as of yesterday and you will have up to 60 days following
January 10, 2011 to exercise any vested awards.
	 
	 	n 	 	Moving Expenses: we will not require you to reimburse Euronet for any costs Euronet
has paid or reimbursed in connection with your move to Kansas City.
	 
	 	n 	 	Mutual Non Disparagement: From and after the date of this letter, you will not make any
disparaging comment in any format, whether written, electronic or oral, to any customer,
vendor, employee, the media, or any other individual or entity regarding Euronet which
relates to our business or related activities, or the relationship between you and
Euronet. From and after the date of this letter, Euronet executives will not make any
disparaging comment in any format, whether written, electronic or oral, to any customer,
vendor, employee, the media, or any other individual or entity regarding you which relates
to your employment with Euronet or related activities, or the relationship between you and
Euronet.





Except as expressly provided otherwise in this letter, all terms and conditions of your Employment
Agreement, and in particular the terms of Section 6 relating to confidentiality and certain other
restrictive covenants, will remain in full force and effect.




Please confirm your agreement to these terms by signing and returning to me a copy of this letter.




We appreciate the efforts you have made on behalf of Euronet, and wish you the best for your future
endeavors.




Very truly yours,




	 	 	 

	/s/ Kevin Caponecchi
 


	 	 






 









 






	 	 	 

	Kevin Caponecchi
	 	 






Acknowledged




	 	 	 

	/s/ Charlie T. Piper
 


	 	 
	Charlie T. Piper
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1997 and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,101
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  128,802
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,903
<PP&E>                                       4,210,473
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,853,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,493,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,493,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,493,285
<SALES>                                        530,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               534,989
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               278,881
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                256,108
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            256,108
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   256,108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    18.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    18.84
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 313 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 313

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify that persons who 
enter into a conspiracy within the United States to possess or traffic 
 illegal controlled substances outside the United States, or engage in 
   conduct within the United States to aid or abet drug trafficking 
 outside the United States, may be criminally prosecuted in the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Drug Trafficking Safe Harbor 
Elimination Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT TO CLARIFY 
              CONSPIRACIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE UNITED STATES MAY BE 
              CRIMINALLY PROSECUTED IN THE UNITED STATES.

    Section 406 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 846) is 
amended by--
            (1) inserting ``(a)'' before ``Any''; and
            (2) inserting at the end the following:
    ``(b) Whoever, within the United States, conspires with one or more 
persons, or aids or abets one or more persons, regardless of where such 
other persons are located, to engage in conduct at any place outside 
the United States that would constitute a violation of this title, 
other than a violation of section 404(a), if committed within the 
United States, shall be subject to the same penalties that would apply 
to such conduct if it were to occur within the United States.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 13, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 313

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify that persons who 
enter into a conspiracy within the United States to possess or traffic 
 illegal controlled substances outside the United States, or engage in 
   conduct within the United States to aid or abet drug trafficking 
 outside the United States, may be criminally prosecuted in the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.
```
# In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

DIVISION THREE JEFFERY PINNELL, ) No. ED106881 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) Franklin County vs. ) 15AB-CC00291 ) CITY OF UNION, MISSOURI, ) Honorable Gael D. Wood ) Respondent. ) Filed: May 14, 2019

OPINION Jeffery Pinnell appeals the judgment of the Circui t Court of Franklin County that granted the City of Union, Missouri’s motion for a directed verdict in this personal injury lawsuit on the grounds that Pinnell failed to make a submissible c ase for waiver of the City’s sovereign immunity under § 537.600.1 1 . Because we find Pinnell adduced substantial evid ence that at the time of his fall from the South Oak Street bridge in Union, the City’s property was in a dangerous condition precluding the entry of a directed verdict, we reve rse and remand.

1 All statutory references are to RSMo 2016.2 Background This action arose from the injuries Pinnell sustai ned on September 9, 2015 when he lost his balance while sitting on the headwall of a shor t bridge or culvert 2 on South Oak Street, a public roadway in Union, and fell 13 feet down into the cr eek below. The features of the bridge relevant to this case included north-south traffic lanes, a pedestrian sidewalk separated from the traffic lane s by a curb, and a headwall from which Pinnell fell, located immediately adjacent to the sidewalk.

The term “headwall” refers to a curb-like structure approximately 18 to 20 inches high and 18 to 20 inches wide, running parallel to the road surfac e along the westernmost edge of the bridge. Pinnell filed a one-count negligence lawsuit again st the City alleging that it maintained the bridge with its sidewalk and headwall in a dangerou s condition that caused his fall and injuries. Specifically, he averred that where Oak Street pass ed over the creek, at a height of 13 feet from the creek bed to the bridge surface, the City “main tained a sidewalk for pedestrian use” on the western side of the roadway, “thereby encouraging p edestrian traffic thereupon,” even though between the sidewalk and the precipitous drop down to the creek there was only a curb-like structure approximately 18 to 20 inches high—the he adwall—which was substantially shorter than the average person’s center of gravity. He further alleged that the City, by maintaining such a low headwall, “encourage[d], entice[d], or otherwise in vite[d] the public to sit upon” it. As a result, Pinnell claimed, the City failed to “adequately pro tect” the public from the foreseeable risk of falling over the headwall and into the creek below, and therefore the City’s premises were in a dangerous condition.

2 The structure in question was referred to during t he lawsuit as a “culvert” and as a “bridge.” For ease of understanding, we will use the term “bridge ” in this opinion and note that the difference is immaterial for purposes of this appeal.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Universal Guardian, Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
J. Skellern, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

/s/ Michael J. Skellern
-----------------------------
Chief Executive
Officer and President
April 12, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

#### Hewitt v. May

November 19, 1984

Case No. (Law) 9090

By JUDGE DONALD H. KENT

This case presents the question as to a landlord’s duty to mitigate his damages and whether a re-entry and acceptance of the tenant’s surrender occurs when the landlord attempts to re-let or sell the premises.

Virginia follows the prevailing rule in most jurisdictions that a landlord has no duty to mitigate damages following the tenant’s abandonment of the premises before the expiration of the lease. *Crowder*v. *Virginian Bank of Commerce,*127 Va 299 (1920).

Following a tenant’s abandonment of the premises, a land-lord may re-enter and terminate the lease. If he does so, then he is entitled to only the rent then due. Unless and until the landlord accepts the surrender or abandonment of the lease by the tenant, there is no termination of the lease and the tenant remains liable for the balance of the rent. Whether there has been an acceptance by the landlord is a matter of intention. It is clear from the facts in this case that the landlord had no intention to terminate the lease.

Judgment will be entered in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,785.00 plus $446.00 in attorney’s fees less the amount of the defendant’s security deposit.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7933 

LONNIE EVERETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TROOPER WILKERSON; TROOPER BRANCH; I. GRAHAM

PRUITT, Magistrate at Pitt County Detention

Center; STACEY A. PHIPPS, Associate Attorney

General,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-04-569-5-4)

Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 4, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lonnie Everett, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lonnie Everett appeals the district court’s order

dismissing as time-barred his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2000). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Everett v. Wilkerson, No. CA-04-569-5-4 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2004).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 99.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)



I, Douglas N. Woodrum, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of CNET Networks, Inc. (CNET);

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of CNET as of and for the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4.	CNET's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for CNET and
have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
related to CNET, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of CNET's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date
within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and

c)	Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.	CNET's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,
to CNET's auditors and the audit committee of CNET's board of directors:

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect CNET's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for CNET's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in CNET's internal controls; and

6.	CNET's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether
there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

May 5, 2003





/s/Douglas N. Woodrum

Douglas N. Woodrum
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
                                  Section 1350

     In connection with the Annual Report of Epic Media, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nicholas Czuczko,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial 2 condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods presented in this
          Report.


Date: March 15, 2006


                                                 /s/ Nicholas A. Czuczko
                                                 -----------------------
                                                     Nicholas Czuczko,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer



                                       28