alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST AMENDMENT AGREEMENT







FOR SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN QRONS AND ASI












This first amendment agreement (this "Amendment Agreement") is entered into as of April 12, 2018 (the "Amendment Effective Date"), by and between Qrons Inc., a company formed under the laws of Wyoming, USA, having a place of business at  1900 Purdy Avenue, #1907, Miami Beach, Florida ("Company") and Ariel Scientific Innovations, Ltd. ("ASI"), a company formed under the laws of the State Israel, having a place of business at Ariel University, Ariel. Company and ASI shall be referred to together in this Amendment Agreement as "the Parties".


 


WHEREAS, ASI and Company are parties to a certain services agreement dated December 14, 2017 (the "Services Agreement"); and







WHEREAS, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 and Exhibit B of the Services Agreement, the fees for the "Services" as defined in the Services Agreement were fixed at $34,500; and







WHEREAS, during the performance of the Services, it has been found necessary to increase the fees, the Parties wish to modify the fees to be paid all in accordance with and subject to the terms of the Services Agreement as amended pursuant to this Amendment Agreement;







NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:







1. Definitions.  All terms used in this Amendment Agreement (including the preamble) with an initial capital letter shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Services Agreement, unless otherwised specified herein.







2. Additional  Fees for the Services.







2.1 The Fees as defined in Section 3 of the Services Agreement is hereby amended to include the following:  At the end of each month during the Service Period commencing on March 31, 2018, ASI will issue an invoice to the Company reflecting additional costs incurred at the request of the Company for that month up to a maximum of NIS 8,000. Such invoice will be paid by the Company within 15 days of receipt. For avoidance of doubt, it is clarified that any such  additional costs shall have  no effect on the fees specified in the Service Agreement.


 


2.2 Except as provided herein,  the terms and conditions of the Services Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above.







	
Ariel Scientific Innovations, Ltd.

	
Qrons Inc.


	
By:/s/Larry Loev

	
By:/s/Jonah Meer


	
Name: Larry Loev

	
Name: Jonah Meer


	
Title: CEO

	
Title: CEO
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 4, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 03-10638

Summary Calendar

GLADYS MARIE GOFF

Plaintiff - Appellant

VERSUS

SOUNDOLIER DIVISION OF AMERICAN TRADING AND PRODUCTION

CORPORATION

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas 

3:98-CV-2254

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff, Gladys Marie Goff, filed this action against

defendant seeking relief for employment discrimination. The

district court dismissed Golf’s action with prejudice on February

15, 2001 and entered final judgment that same date. Goff filed her
2

notice of appeal more than two years later on June 25, 2003.

Because Goff’s notice of appeal from the February 15, 2001 judgment

was untimely this court has no jurisdiction to review that order.

Goff then filed a motion for leave to reinstate her complaint on 

February 14, 2003. The district court treated that motion as a

motion for relief under Rule 60(b)F.R.C.P. and denied the motion on

June 19, 2003. Goff filed a timely appeal from that order.

After reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties we

are satisfied that the district court did not abuse its discretion

in denying Goff’s Rule 60(b) motion.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Delphi Financial Group, Inc. (the
Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; and3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report.
  /s/ ROBERT ROSENKRANZRobert RosenkranzChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3218 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3218

To amend section 1343 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
 to ensure the privacy of individually identifiable health information 
                  in connection with risk adjustment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 14, 2011

 Mr. Bucshon (for himself and Mr. Huelskamp) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 1343 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
 to ensure the privacy of individually identifiable health information 
                  in connection with risk adjustment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENSURING THE PRIVACY OF INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFIABLE HEALTH 
              INFORMATION IN CONNECTION WITH RISK ADJUSTMENT.

    Section 1343 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 
U.S.C. 18063) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(d) Ensuring Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health 
Information.--In establishing standards relating to the collection and 
sharing of risk-related data to carry out risk adjustment under this 
title, the Secretary shall not be provided access to data in 
individually identifiable form.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-20407

Summary Calendar

LA TONYA D. JUDON, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

EP ENERGY, L.L.C., 

 Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CV-1834

Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

La Tonya Judon sued EP Energy for retaliation under the Family and 

Medical Leave Act (the “FMLA”) and for hostile work environment. The 

district court granted summary judgment for EP Energy and Judon appeals

the dismissal. On appeal, Judon brings additional claims for the first time. 

We do not consider these claims. See Stewart Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. U.S. Auto 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 6, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-20407 Document: 00514861394 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2019
No. 18-20407

2

Glass Disc. Ctrs., Inc., 200 F.3d 307, 316–17 (5th Cir. 2000) (“It is a bedrock 

principle of appellate review that claims raised for the first time on appeal will 

not be considered. This rule is equally applicable in summary judgment 

cases.”). 

First, Judon claims EP Energy dismissed her in retaliation because she 

requested leave under the FMLA. Second, Judon argues, because of her 

disabilities, EP Energy created a hostile work environment. EP Energy 

responds that they terminated Judon because of her demonstrated pattern of 

poor performance, disciplinary actions, and insubordination. An employer may 

point to a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for termination as a defense to a 

retaliation claim. See Ion v. Chevron USA, Inc., 731 F.3d 379, 390 (5th Cir. 

2013). 

Regarding her second preserved claim, Judon only points to two 

instances of hostility over three years of employment to establish a hostile 

work environment. Neither instance rises to the necessary level to show a 

hostile work environment. Patton v. Jacobs Eng’g Group, Inc., 874 F.3d 437, 

445 (5th Cir. 2017). 

We have reviewed the briefs, the applicable law, and relevant parts of 

the record. The district court committed no reversible error. The judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

 Case: 18-20407 Document: 00514861394 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/06/2019
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the directio n of the Court.

January 16 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk January 23 , 2019

15 7951 ( 67 ) (68)

JAWAD A. SHAH, M.D., PC, INTEGRATED

HOSPITAL SPECIALISTS, PC, INSIGHT

ANESTHESIA, PLLC, and STERLING

ANESTHESIA, PLLC,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

SC: 157951

v COA: 340370

Genesee CC: 17

- 108637

- NF

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellant

.

_____________________________________ __ _

/

On order of the C hief Justice , the separate motion s of the Michigan Brain Injury

Provider Council and the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel to participate as amic i curiae

and to extend the time for filing amicus brief s are GRANTED. The amicus brief s submitted

by those orga nizations on January 1 6 , 201 9 , are accepted for filing

.
#### Windy PAYNE, individually and as guardian on behalf of; D.P., a minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PENINSULA SCHOOL DISTRICT, a municipal corporation; Artondale Elementary School, a municipal corporation; Jodi Coy, in her individual *1002and official capacity; James Coolican, in his individual and official capacity; Jane Does 1-10; John Does 1-10, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-35115.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 7, 2010.

Thomas Brian Yertetis, Esquire, Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & Daheim, LLP, Tacoma, WA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Donald F. Austin, Esquire, Michael A. Patterson, Esquire, Patterson Buchanan Fobes Leitch & Kalzer, Inc., PS, Seattle, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
EXHIBIT 32.1 – 906 Certification








ENERGIZ RENEWABLE, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Energiz Renewable, Inc. formerly C&G Dec Capital, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward T. Whelan, CEO and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.








By: /s/ Edward T. Whelan


Edward T. Whelan


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer





April 18, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Energiz Renewable, Inc., and will be retained by Energiz Renewable, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 298 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 500 East Whitestone Boulevard in Cedar 

Park, Texas, as the ‘‘Army Specialist Matthew Troy 

Morris Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 298 EH

1 SECTION 1. ARMY SPECIALIST MATTHEW TROY MORRIS 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 500 East Whitestone Boulevard 

5 in Cedar Park, Texas, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Army Specialist Matthew Troy Morris Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Army Specialist Mat12 thew Troy Morris Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 14, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 298 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Posting’’. cialist Matthew Troy Morris Post Office Build- vard in Cedar Park, Texas, as the ‘‘Army Spe- al Service located at 500 East Whitestone Boule-
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40550 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHN RUSSELL PELSER, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CR-61-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - October 22, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * John Russell Pelser is appealing from his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute or dispense methamphetamine and aiding and abetting the same offense. He argues that the district court erred by not granting him a reduction in sentence for acceptance of responsibility. The district court denied Pelser an offense level reduction for acceptance of responsibility because Pelser engaged in assaultive behavior while on pretrial release. A sentencingNo. 97-40550 -2- court may properly deny a defendant a reduction for failing to refrain from criminal conduct while on pretrial release. United States v. Rickett , 89 F.3d 224, 227 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 117 S.Ct. 499 (1996). The district court did not clearly err by denying Pelser a reduction for acceptance of responsibility. See United States v. Thomas , 12 F.3d 1350, 1372 & n.39 (5th Cir. 1994). AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1



     Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



      I, Marshall W. Pagon, the Chief Executive Officer of Pegasus Satellite
Communications, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of Pegasus Satellite
Communications, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the "June 30,
2003 Form 10-Q"), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and information contained in the June 30, 2003 Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Pegasus Satellite Communications, Inc.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Pegasus Satellite Communications, Inc. and will be retained by
Pegasus Satellite Communications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:  August 14, 2003


                                 /s/ Marshall W. Pagon
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                 Marshall W. Pagon
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0453

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SCOTT KELLY WALSH,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuan t to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Heidi J . Ulbricht , Distric t Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Jim Rice Justice, Montana Supreme Court February 1 2023

02/01/2023
Case Number: DA 21-0453
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15320 and #15321; U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Disaster Number VI-00011]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-4340-DR), dated 09/20/2017. *Incident:*
                         Hurricane Maria. *Incident Period:*
                         09/16/2017 and continuing.
 DATES: Issued on 09/20/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/20/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/20/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/20/2017, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Areas (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*
                     Saint Croix *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*
                     None The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.500Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.750Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.610Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305( print page 45351)Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 153208 and for economic injury is 153210. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2017-20731 Filed 9-27-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
i- No folio

Constantino Brumidi:

ARTIST OF THE CAPITOL
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 7142

DANIEL W. COLLINS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. DONALD AMES, Superintendent , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Bluefield

. David A. Faber , Senior District Judge. ( 1:22

- cv - 00082 )

Submitted : December 20 , 2022 Decided: December 27, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Daniel W. Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Sara See, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA , Charleston, West Virginia, for Appelle e.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7142 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Daniel W. Collins seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Collins’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition without pr ejudice . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional ri ght.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. Se e Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v.
Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Collins has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss th e appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7142 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 2