alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.9


 Exhibit 4.9 

EIGHTH AMENDMENT 
 OF 

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP 
 EXECUTIVE
SAVINGS PLAN 
 (2004 Statement) 

WHEREAS, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, a Minnesota corporation (“UnitedHealth Group”) has heretofore established and
maintains several nonqualified, deferred compensation programs (the “ESP”) for the benefit of a select group of management or highly compensated employees of UnitedHealth Group and certain affiliates of UnitedHealth Group; and 

WHEREAS, said programs are currently embodied in a single document which is effective January 1, 2004, and which is entitled
“UNITEDHEALTH GROUP EXECUTIVE SAVINGS PLAN (2004 Statement)” (hereinafter referred to as the “Plan Statement”); and 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of UnitedHealth Group has delegated to the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board of
Directors the power and authority to amend the Plan Statement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee has
further delegated its authority to amend the Plan Statement to the Executive Vice President, Human Capital with the exception of amendments that would materially increase the cost of the ESP, and amendments that are required to be adopted by the
Board of Directors or the Compensation and Human Resources Committee in order to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code or Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

WHEREAS, the Executive Vice President, Human Capital wishes to amend the Plan Statement to provide that UnitedHealthcare of Illinois,
Inc. shall become a participating employer effective as of March 19, 2017; and 
 WHEREAS, the Executive Vice President, Human
Capital has determined that such amendment will not materially increase the cost of the ESP, and that none of such amendments are required to be adopted by the Board of Directors or the Compensation and Human Resources Committee in order to comply
with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code or Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan Statement is hereby amended in the following respect: 

1.    SCHEDULE 1 EMPLOYERS PARTICIPATING IN THE UNITEDHEALTH GROUP EXECUTIVE SAVINGS PLAN. Effective as of March 19, 2017,
Schedule 1 is amended to read as follows: 






 SCHEDULE 1 

EMPLOYERS PARTICIPATING IN THE UNITEDHEALTH GROUP EXECUTIVE 

SAVINGS PLAN 
 Effective as
of March 19, 2017  
 U.S. Domestic Corporations 

1.    United Healthcare Services, Inc. 

2.    UHC International Services, Inc. 

3.    Health Plan of Nevada, Inc. 

4.    Sierra Health and Life Insurance Company, Inc. 

5.    Southwest Medical Associates, Inc. 

6.    Optum Services, Inc. 

7.    Optum360 Services, Inc. 

8.    PrimeCare Medical Network, Inc. 

9.    Monarch Health Plan 

10.    March Vision Care, Inc. 

11.    UnitedHealthcare of Illinois, Inc. 

Dated: March 3, 2017 
  

	
	/s/ Ellen Wilson
	Ellen Wilson
	Office of the Chief Executive and Executive Vice President, Human Capital UnitedHealth Group



  
 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALLAIRE
CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          54,407
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,866
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (532)
<INVENTORY>                                        104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,429
<PP&E>                                           7,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,724)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,012
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           116
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,602
<SALES>                                          6,963
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,697
<CGS>                                              456
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,616)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,616)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,616)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             811
<SECURITIES>                                     1,672
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,950
<ALLOWANCES>                                       376
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,511
<PP&E>                                           4,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,011
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,512
<SALES>                                          4,214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,214
<CGS>                                              478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (21)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (473)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (144)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (329)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### BACHE et al. v. UNITED STATES.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

December 9, 1896.)

No. 2,019.

Customs Duties — Classification—Window Glass.

Cylinder, crown, or common window glass, which has either been colored throughout when melted, or colored on the outsides by flashing, is subject to the additional duty imposed by paragraph 118 of the tariff act of 1890 upon such glass “when ground, obscured, * * * colored, or otherwise ornamented or decorated,” and is not dutiable under paragraph 122, as stained or painted window glass, though called iu the trade “stained window glass.”

This was an appeal by Semon Hache & Co. from a decision of the board of general appraisers sustaining the classification, by the collector of the port of New York, of certain window glass imported by them. The collector classified the glass as cylinder, -crown, or common window glass, dutiable under paragraph 112 of the tariff act of 1890, and subject to the additional duty of 10 per cent, imposed by paragraph 118. The importers protested, on the ground that the glass should have been classified, according to size, under paragraph 112 only, or at 45 per cent, ad valorem, under paragraph 122, and that paragraph 118 did not apply, because none of the processes therein referred to had been applied to it after it became window glass.

W. Wickham Smith, for plaintiffs.

James T. Van Rensselaer, for the United States.

WHEELER, District Judge.

The act of 1890 provided, by paragraph 112, for a duty by the pound on “unpolished cylinder, crown and common window glass”; and, by paragraph 118, for an additional duty of 10 per centum ad valorem on “cylinder, crown or common window glass, when ground, obscured, frosted, sanded, enameled, beveled, etched, embossed, engraved, stained, colored, or otherwise ornamented or decorated”; and, by paragraph 122, for a different duty on “all stained or painted window glass, and stained or painted glass windows.” The importation in question is of cylinder, crown, or common window glass, a part of which was colored throughout when melted, and the rest on the outsides, by flashing. All of it is *604window glass colored and obscured exactly according to the description and provisions of paragraph 118. It was assessed by the collector according to these provisions, and on a protest that it was stained window glass, under paragraph 122, his classification was affirmed by the board of general appraisers.

The evidence shows that it is called in the trade “stained window glass,” but that does not change its nature, nor take it out of its specific description by which it was placed. Stained or painted window glass is a different thing; and confounding these names does not make them the same thing. The express provision of the law placing this duty upon this kind of window glass is not obviated by this confusion. It does not seem to be a question of trade-names, but a question of description, and that appears to have been well followed. Decision affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual report of Torrent Energy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Gustafson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Torrent Energy Corporation and will be retained by Torrent Energy Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date:  December 21, 2004 | By:/s/ MARK GUSTAFSONMark Gustafson
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

January 23, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00764

- CR & 04

- 18

- 00765

- CR

The STATE of Texas

, Appellant

v.

Mark Anthony GONZALEZ

, Appellee

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas Trial Court No. 10041CR & 10056CR Honorable Spencer W. Brown, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State ’ s Motion Relating to Case Record and to Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of January, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,129
<SECURITIES>                                   1,620
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,211
<ALLOWANCES>                                   343
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,902
<PP&E>                                         4,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,179
<BONDS>                                        1,964
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       57
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,011
<SALES>                                        2,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,216
<CGS>                                          280
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (16)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (11)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (166)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (43)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (123)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (123)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3307 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3307

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the renewable 
                             energy credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 2, 2011

Mr. Reichert (for himself, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Lucas, Mr. King of Iowa, 
 Mr. Latham, Mr. Dold, Mr. Peterson, Mr. Braley of Iowa, Mr. Larson of 
 Connecticut, Mr. Boswell, and Mr. Thompson of California) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the renewable 
                             energy credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Renewable Energy Production 
Tax Credit Extension Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY CREDIT.

    (a) Wind.--Paragraph (1) of section 45(d) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``January 1, 2013'' and inserting 
``January 1, 2017''.
    (b) Biomass, Geothermal, Small Irrigation, Landfill Gas, Trash, and 
Hydropower.--Each of the following provisions of section 45(d) of such 
Code is amended by striking ``January 1, 2014'' and inserting ``January 
1, 2017'':
            (1) Clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph (2)(A).
            (2) Clauses (i)(I) and (ii) of paragraph (3)(A).
            (3) Paragraph (4).
            (4) Paragraph (6).
            (5) Paragraph (7).
            (6) Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (9).
            (7) Subparagraph (B) of paragraph (11).
                                 <all>
```
#### Melvin B. COLEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WARDEN, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 07-7604.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 5, 2008.

Decided: June 26, 2008.

Melvin B. Coley, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip Michael Pickus, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Melvin B. Coley appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 motion for summary judgment on Coley’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Coley v. Warden,*No. 8:07-cv-01073-DKC (D.Md. Sep. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2980 

To limit reimbursement for excessive compensation of government contractors 

equal to the pay of Cabinet Secretaries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 

Mr. TONKO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee 

on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To limit reimbursement for excessive compensation of government contractors equal to the pay of Cabinet Secretaries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Excessive Tax5 payer Payments to Government Contractors Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ALLOWABLE COMPENSATION 

7 COSTS. 

8 (a) LIMITATION.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2980 IH

1 (1) CIVILIAN CONTRACTS.—Section 

2 4304(a)(16) of title 41, United States Code, is 

3 amended to read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(16) Costs of compensation of contractor and 

5 subcontractor employees for a fiscal year, regardless 

6 of the contract funding source, to the extent that 

7 such compensation exceeds the rate payable for level 

8 I of the Executive Schedule under section 5312 of 

9 title 5.’’. 

10 (2) DEFENSE CONTRACTS.—Section 

11 2324(e)(1)(P) of title 10, United States Code, is 

12 amended to read as follows: 

13 ‘‘(P) Costs of compensation of contractor and 

14 subcontractor employees for a fiscal year, regardless 

15 of the contract funding source, to the extent that 

16 such compensation exceeds the rate payable for level 

17 I of the Executive Schedule under section 5312 of 

18 title 5.’’. 

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

20 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1127 of title 41, 

21 United States Code, is hereby repealed. 

22 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec23 tions at the beginning of chapter 11 of title 41, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2980 IH

1 United States Code, is amended by striking the item 

2 relating to section 1127. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 13, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00458

- CR

Victor RIGGAN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR171326

Honorable Susan Harris, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The State ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The State ’ s brief is

due on January 14, 2019.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of December, 2018

.

__ _________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
         Company's balance sheets and related statements of operations for the
         period ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
         reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                          2,602
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   9,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      275
<INVENTORY>                                                     3,203
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               18,162
<PP&E>                                                          9,827
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  2,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 27,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           6,658
<BONDS>                                                         3,165
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                        8,651
<OTHER-SE>                                                     11,188
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   27,245
<SALES>                                                        56,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               56,837
<CGS>                                                          27,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  27,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               31,662
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  128
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      659
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             1,393
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (1,393)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (0.16)




</TABLE>