alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**Exhibit        32.1**

|   | a) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or                  78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the Company                  as of the dates and for the periods covered by the                  Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August                  14, 2007 | /s/                  Deborah C. Wright |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                             |                                   |
| Dated                            | Deborah                  C. Wright     |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,183
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                        99
<INVENTORY>                                        180
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,034
<PP&E>                                          30,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,285
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           17,079
<PREFERRED>                                      3,144
<COMMON>                                       (30,557)
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,101)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,506
<SALES>                                        130,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               130,604
<CGS>                                          126,424
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,496
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,095
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,686)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,686)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      18
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,668)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.89)

</TABLE>
CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY

#### Odell Wormley v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Anthony Wormley et al.

April 11, 1984

Case No. (Law) 23831

By JUDGE THOMAS R. MONROE

Counsel for Plaintiff and Counsel for Third-Party Defendants have filed Memoranda in this cause and each has been reviewed by this Court.

Lillie Mae Wormley died on November 29, 1981, from a subdural hematoma. Odell Wormley was convicted of voluntary manslaughter of Lillie Mae Wormley on June 11, 1982.

The question before this Court is whether a beneficiary convicted of voluntary manslaughter of the deceased insured should receive the proceeds from the life insurance policy.

Title 55, Chapter 22, Section 55-401, definition Number 1 defines "slayer" as "any person who is convicted of the murder of the decedent." Odell Wormley was convicted of voluntary manslaughter, not murder. The terms "voluntary manslaughter" and "murder" are distinguished and defined under Section 18.2-35 and Section 18.2-32 respectively. Section 55-411, paragraph A, in pertinent part provides:

> *179Insurance proceeds payable to the slayer as the beneficiary ... of any policy ... of insurance ... on the life of the decedent . . . shall be paid to the estate of the decedent...

Odell Wormley, by statutory definition, was not the "slayer" of Lillie Mae Wormley in that he was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and not murder. The Court, therefore, holds that the Plaintiff, Odell Wormley, is not barred from receiving the insurance proceeds payable to him as beneficiary.

The Third-Party Defendants’ Motion for Declaratory Judgment is, therefore, denied.
```

[United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions (Plum Book), 1996]
[Independent Agencies and Government Corporations]
[National Mediation Board]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

The Plum Book (United States Government Policy
        and Supporting Positions): 1996 EditionBRANCH: EXECUTIVE NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARDLocationPosition TitleName of IncumbentPay PlanType of Appt.Level Grade or PayTenureExpiresWashington, DCChairmanKenneth B. Hipp (R)EXPASIII3 years06/30/1997Washington, DCBoard MemberMagdalena G. Jacobsen (D)EXPASIV3 years06/30/1996Washington, DCBoard MemberErnest W. Dubester (D)EXPASIV3 years06/30/1998Washington, DCChief of StaffStephen CrableESCA............................Washington, DCGeneral CounselRonald M. EttersESCA............................Washington, DCConfidential Assistant to the ChairmanNancy GlassmanGSSC12..................Washington, DCConfidential AssistantConnie D. WielatzGSSC12..................Washington, DCConfidential AssistantRachel FarrisGSSC12..................
```
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Twinlab Corporation (the
"Company") hereby certifies that:

         (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
     the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
     with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



Dated: May 15, 2003                            /s/ Ross Blechman
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Ross Blechman
                                            Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 21

- 20356 Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Rodolfo Sanchez Navarrete,

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 29

- 1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodolfo Sanchez
Navarrete has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Navarrete has not filed a response. We have

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 17, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-20356 Document: 00516168888 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/17/2022No. 21

- 20356

2 reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir.
R. 42.2

. Case: 21-20356 Document: 00516168888 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/17/2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0456 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANTHONY SCOTT CHARLIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 14 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 9 2024

09/09/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0456
H. R. 3220 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 170 Evergreen 

Square SW in Pine City, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Master Sergeant Daniel L. Fedder 

Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MASTER SERGEANT DANIEL L. FEDDER POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 170 Evergreen Square SW in Pine City, Minnesota, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Master Sergeant 

Daniel L. Fedder Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Master Sergeant Daniel L. Fedder Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 4.103


 


Power of Attorney


 


I, Yu Bo, a Chinese
citizen with Chinese Identification Card No. 420106196805034857, and a holder of 50% of the entire registered capital in
Shenzhen E-Sun Network Co., Ltd(the “Company”) (“My Shareholding”), hereby irrevocably authorize
E-Sun Sky Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“WFOE”) to exercise the following rights relating to My Shareholding during
the term of this Power of Attorney:


 


WFOE is hereby authorized
to act on behalf of myself as my exclusive agent and attorney with respect of all matters concerning My Shareholding, including
without limitation to: 1) attend shareholder’s meetings of Company; 2) exercise all the shareholders’ rights and shareholders’
voting rights I am entitled to under the laws of China and Company’s Articles of Association during the shareholders’
meeting, including but not limited to decide on the sale or transfer or pledge or disposition of My Shareholding in part or in
whole and execute relevant legal documents; and 3) designate and appoint on behalf of myself the legal representative, the executive
director, supervisor, the manager and other senior management members of Company.


 


Without limiting the generality
of the powers granted hereunder, WFOE shall have the power and authority under this Power of Attorney to execute the Transfer Contracts
stipulated in Exclusive Option Agreement, to which I am required to be a party, on behalf of myself, and to effect the terms of
the Share Pledge Agreement and Exclusive Option Agreement, both dated the date hereof, to which I am a party.


 


All the actions associated
with My Shareholding conducted by WFOE shall be deemed as my own actions, and all the documents related to My Shareholding executed
by WFOE shall be deemed to be executed by me. I hereby acknowledge and ratify those actions and/or documents by WFOE.


 


WFOE is entitled to re-authorize
or assign its rights related to the aforesaid matters to any other person or entity at its own discretion and without giving prior
notice to me or obtaining my consent.


 


This Power of Attorney
is coupled with an interest and shall be irrevocable and continuously valid from the date of execution of this Power of Attorney,
so long as I am a shareholder of Company.


 


This Power of Attorney
is written in Chinese and English; in case there is any conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese
version shall prevail.


 


	 	By: 	/s/ Yu Bo	 
	 	Date: July 3, 2017
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the June 30, 2002 Form 10-Q of Cornell Companies, Inc.
(the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry J Phillips, Jr., certify that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

     This certification should not be deemed to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Report, except to the extent required to
satisfy 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

                                     /s/ Harry J. Phillips, Jr.
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Harry J. Phillips, Jr., Executive Chairman,
                                     Chairman of the Board and Director
                                     August 14, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 187 (Thursday, September 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 45322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20775]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Engineering; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Advisory Committee for Engineering (#1170)
    Date and Time:
    October 24, 2017: 12:15 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    October 25, 2017: 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Room E 
2020, Alexandria, Virginia 22314.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Evette Rollins, National Science Foundation, 2415 
Eisenhower Avenue, Suite C, 14000, Alexandria, Virginia 22314; 703-292-
8300.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations and counsel 
on major goals and policies pertaining to engineering programs and 
activities.

Agenda

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

<bullet> Directorate for Engineering Report
<bullet> NSF Budget Update
<bullet> Reports from Advisory Committee Liaisons
<bullet> Intelligent Cognitive Assistants
<bullet> Break-out Session: Intelligent Cognitive Assistants
<bullet> Reporting and Discussion: Breakout Sessions

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

<bullet> Fostering Convergent Research to Address Grand Challenges
<bullet> Future of Multidisciplinary Engineering Research Centers
<bullet> Perspective from the Director's Office
<bullet> Breakout Sessions: Future of Multidisciplinary Engineering 
Research Centers
<bullet> Reporting and Discussion: Breakout Sessions
<bullet> Roundtable on Strategic Recommendations for ENG

    Dated: September 25, 2017.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-20775 Filed 9-27-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK

#### Commonwealth of Virginia v. Charles V. Goddard

March 11, 1987

By JUDGE CHARLES R. WATERS, II

As you know, I have been called on by defense counsel to dismiss the indictments rendered against Charles V. Goddard upon the ground that Goddard was denied his right to a preliminary hearing as set forth in 8 19.2-218, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, a right which Goddard did not waive. No constitutional questions have been raised; therefore, none will be considered. Counsel have informed the court that there is no law on the subject except Code 8 19.2-218.

In General District Court, Criminal Division, a police officer who knew nothing of the case was asked his name and job title, and nothing else. The Honorable Reid M. Spencer dismissed all charges against Goddard, and Goddard was nevertheless indicted.

Defense counsel claims that Goddard was denied his right of preliminary hearing, a denial which carried with it the right to cross-examine, introduce witnesses on his own behalf and testify on his own behalf. Of course, Goddard could have testified and could have introduced witnesses but chose not to do so. He was, for all meaningful purposes, denied the right of cross-examination. Moreover, defense counsel contends that the return of the indictments against Goddard was improper and illegal since he neither had nor waived a preliminary hearing in contravention of Code § 19.2-218.

The Commonwealth states that at the preliminary hearing it was necessary to mask the identity of the *371officer familiar with the case because he was about to embark on a sting operation which required anonymity. Moreover, this procedure is no longer being utilized. The position of the Commonwealth is that "technically” a preliminary hearing was accomplished and that the action of the Commonwealth was within the limits of the law.

I disagree.

If the letter of the law was followed, the spirit and intent of the law was not.

A preliminary hearing, in my opinion, is a screening device created for the benefit of the defendant. The action of the Commonwealth in intentionally refusing to put on a prima facie case makes a mockery of the procedure, and causes a waste of untold effort and money. A hollow formality is not an adequate substitute for a legislated judicial procedure.

An order will be entered dismissing the indictments returned against Goddard.
Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors

American Fidelity Assurance Company and

Contract Owners

 American Fidelity Separate Account C:


We consent to the use of our report dated April 19, 2018, with respect to the statutory statements of admitted assets, liabilities and capital and surplus of American Fidelity Assurance Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related statutory statements of operations, capital and surplus, and cash flow for each of the years in the three‐year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes to the statutory financial statements and related schedules I, III, and IV included in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of the Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form N‐4 dated April 27, 2018, and to the reference to our firm under the heading "Custodian and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", included in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of the Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form N‐4 dated April 27, 2018.


Our report dated April 19, 2018, includes explanatory language that states that American Fidelity Assurance Company prepared the statutory financial statements using statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Oklahoma Insurance Department, which is a basis of accounting other than U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, our report states that the statutory financial statements are not presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and further states that those statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, in conformity with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Oklahoma Insurance Department.


/s/KPMG, LLP


Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

 April 27, 2018
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

                        AVANIR PHARMACEUTICALS

       We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 33-49082 on Form S-l, Registration Statement Nos. 33-71276, 33-94370,
333-83089 and 333-84183 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement Nos. 33-76094,
33-90048, 33-64983, 333-24549, 333-76641 and 333-77925 on Form S-3 of AVANIR
Pharmaceuticals, formerly LIDAK Pharmaceuticals, (a development stage
enterprise) of our report dated December 21, 1999 (which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the status
of the Company as a development stage enterprise, the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern, and the Company as a defendant in certain lawsuits)
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AVANIR Pharmaceuticals for the
year ended September 30, 1999.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Diego, California
January 11, 2000
Exhibit 32.6

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The  undersigned  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership III-F ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 16th day of April, 2007.

                                GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP III-F
                                ("Issuer")

                                //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                -----------------------------------
                                Dennis R. Neill
                                President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                -----------------------------------
                                Craig D. Loseke
                                Chief Accounting Officer
                                (Chief Financial Officer)