alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

William W. Frey, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00086

- CV v.

Donnie Foster, Sheriff of Fannin County, Fannin County, Dr. Jagdish Shah, Community Education Centers, Inc., Appellee s Appeal from the 336t h District Court of Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CV

- 12

- 40619 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss

and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, William W. Frey, has adequately indicated his inability to pay

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 14, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R . MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**EXHIBIT 21.1****SUBSIDIARIES**         PercentageSubsidiary Incorporated In OwnedMedicis, The Dermatology Company® Delaware 100% Dermavest, Inc. Nevada 100% Medicis Manufacturing Corporation Delaware 100% GenDerm Corporation Delaware 100% Medicis Canada Ltd. Canada 100% Ucyclyd Pharma, Inc. Maryland 100% Medicis Pediatrics, Inc. Delaware 100% Medicis Aesthetics Holdings Inc. Delaware 100% Medicis Aesthetics Inc. Delaware 100% Dermavest Swedish Holdings AB Sweden 100% HA North American Sales AB Sweden 100% Medicis Aesthetics Canada Ltd. Canada 100% Masterpiece Acquisition Corporation Delaware 100%
EXHIBIT 11.1
                            CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC.
                 Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings
                     (in thousands except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,                NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                       --------------------------------------------    --------------------------------------------
                                               2000                    1999                    2000                    1999
                                       --------------------    --------------------    --------------------    --------------------
                                        BASIC      DILUTED      BASIC      DILUTED      BASIC      DILUTED      BASIC      DILUTED
                                       --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
<S>                                    <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Net Earnings .......................   $  1,932    $  1,932    $  2,287    $  2,287    $  6,096    $  6,096    $  2,554    $  2,554
                                       ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

Shares used in computing
  net earnings per share:
     Weighted average common
       shares and common share
       equivalents .................     10,161      10,161      10,138      10,138      10,157      10,157      10,126      10,126


     Less treasury shares ..........       (770)       (770)       (697)       (697)       (722)       (722)       (697)       (697)

     Effect of shares issuable
       under stock options and
       warrants based on the
       treasury stock method .......       --           134        --           210        --           135        --           244
                                       --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------

                                          9,391       9,525       9,440       9,650       9,435       9,570       9,429       9,673
                                       --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------


 Net earnings per share ............   $   0.21    $   0.20    $   0.24    $   0.24    $   0.65    $   0.64    $   0.27    $   0.26
                                       ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3224 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the new markets 

tax credit through 2016, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 14, 2011 

Mr. HIGGINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the new markets tax credit through 2016, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF NEW MARKETS TAX CREDIT. 

4 (a) EXTENSION.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 

6 45D(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

7 amended— 

8 (A) by striking the period at the end of 

9 subparagraph (G) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3224 IH

1 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

2 subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(H) $10,000,000,000 for 2012, 2013, 

4 2014, 2015, 2016.’’. 

5 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

6 45D(f)(3) of such Code is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘2016’’ and inserting ‘‘2021’’. 

8 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Subsection (f) of sec9 tion 45D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend10 ed by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(4) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.— 

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any cal13 endar year beginning after 2012, the dollar 

14 amount in paragraph (1)(H) shall be increased 

15 by an amount equal to— 

16 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

17 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de18 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal19 endar year, determined by substituting 

20 ‘calendar year 2011’ for ‘calendar year 

21 1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. 

22 ‘‘(B) ROUNDING RULE.—If a dollar 

23 amount in paragraph (1)(G), as increased 

24 under subparagraph (A), is not a multiple of 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3224 IH

1 $1,000,000, such amount shall be rounded to 

2 the nearest multiple of $1,000,000.’’. 

3 (c) ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX RELIEF.—Subpara4 graph (B) of section 38(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue 

5 Code of 1986 is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating clauses (v) through (ix) as 

7 clauses (vi) through (x), respectively, and 

8 (2) by inserting after clause (iv) the following 

9 new clause: 

10 ‘‘(v) the credit determined under sec11 tion 45D, but only with respect to credits 

12 determined with respect to qualified equity 

13 investments (as defined in section 45D(b)) 

14 initially made before January 1, 2017,’’. 

15 (d) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

16 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall take effect on the date of the en18 actment of this Act. 

19 (2) SUBSECTION (c).—The amendments made 

20 by subsection (c) shall apply to credits determined 

21 with respect to qualified equity investments (as de22 fined in section 45D(b) of the Internal Revenue 

23 Code of 1986) initially made after the date of the 

24 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 298 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 298

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 500 East Whitestone Boulevard in Cedar Park, Texas, as the ``Army 
         Specialist Matthew Troy Morris Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARMY SPECIALIST MATTHEW TROY MORRIS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 500 East Whitestone Boulevard in Cedar Park, Texas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Army Specialist Matthew Troy Morris Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Army 
Specialist Matthew Troy Morris Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 14, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 298

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 500 East Whitestone Boulevard in Cedar Park, Texas, as the ``Army 
         Specialist Matthew Troy Morris Post Office Building''.
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of registration.
 SUMMARY: Registrants listed below have applied for and been granted registration by the Drug Enforcement Administration as importers of various classes of schedule I or II controlled substances.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The companies listed below applied to be registered as importers of various basic classes of controlled substances. Information on previously published notices is listed in the table below. No comments or objections were submitted and no requests for hearing were submitted for these notices. Company
FR docket
PublishedUnited States PharmacopeialConvention
82 FR 34694
July 26, 2017.AMRI Rensselaer, Inc
82 FR 34696
July 26, 2017.R & D Systems, Inc
82 FR 35546
July 31, 2017.Sigma-Aldrich InternationalGMBH
82 FR 35547
July 31, 2017.Cambrex High Point, Inc
82 FR 35992
August 2, 2017.
 The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823, 952(a) and 958(a) and determined that the registration of the listed registrants to import the applicable basic classes of schedule I or II controlled substances is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA investigated each company's maintenance of effective controls against diversion by inspecting and testing each company's physical security systems, verifying each company's compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing each company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the DEA has granted a registration as an importer for schedule I or II controlled substances to the above listed persons. Dated: September 21, 2017. Demetra Ashley, Acting Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2017-20943 Filed 9-28-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
CONFIDENTIAL RETIREMENT AGREEMENT  AND GENERAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS
 shirley.olerich@tridentmicro.com
        Christos Lagomichos Retirement Agreement and Release
    
    1
    
    Confidential




---



##### 



Christos Lagomichos Retirement Agreement and Release
    
    2
    
    Confidential




---



##### 



However, the Company does not guarantee any
particular tax effect for income provided to the Executive pursuant to this Agreement.
  EXECUTIVE UNDERSTANDS THAT HE SHOULD CONSULT WITH AN ATTORNEY PRIOR TO SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT
AND THAT HE IS GIVING UP ANY LEGAL CLAIMS (AS DESCRIBED ABOVE IN PARAGRAPHS 5 AND 6) HE HAS AGAINST
THE PARTIES RELEASED ABOVE BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT. EXECUTIVE FURTHER UNDERSTANDS THAT HE MAY
HAVE UP TO 21 DAYS TO CONSIDER THIS AGREEMENT, THAT HE MAY REVOKE IT AT ANY TIME DURING THE 7 DAYS
AFTER HE SIGNS IT, AND THAT IT SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE UNTIL THAT 7-DAY PERIOD HAS PASSED.
EXECUTIVE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE IS SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT KNOWINGLY, WILLINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY IN
EXCHANGE FOR THE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH 4, WHICH COMPENSATION AND
BENEFITS HE WOULD NOT OTHERWISE BE ENTITLED TO RECEIVE.
 Dated: January 19, 2011
    /s/ Christos LagomichosChristos Lagomichos Christos Lagomichos Retirement Agreement and Release
    
    3
    
    Confidential




---



##### 



TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.Dated:  January 20, 2011
    By:
    /s/ David L. TeichmannDavid L. TeichmannIts:
    Executive Vice President, General Counsel
& Corporate Secretary  Dated: February 9, 2011
    /s/ Christos LagomichosChristos Lagomichos Christos Lagomichos Retirement Agreement and Release
    
    4
    
    Confidential
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,035
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,073
<PP&E>                                       4,930,846
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,520,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,478,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,244,548
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,610,475
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,478,613
<SALES>                                      1,085,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,085,465
<CGS>                                           23,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,344,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             198,687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (502,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (502,641)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit
      23.1





**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





The
      Stockholders and Board of Directors


The
      Reader's Digest Association, Inc.





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
      33-37434, 33-56883, 333-57789, 333-42726, 333-105325, 333-105326, and
      333-105327) on Form S-8 of The Reader's Digest Association, Inc. of our reports
      dated August 17, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
      of
      The Reader's Digest Association, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the year
      ended June 30, 2006, The Reader's Digest Association, Inc. and subsidiaries
      management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
      as
      of June 30, 2006, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
      June 30, 2006.





/s/
      Ernst
& Young LLP


Stamford,
      Connecticut


August
      17, 2006
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual report of Torrent Energy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Gustafson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Torrent Energy Corporation and will be retained by Torrent Energy Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date:  December 21, 2004 | By:/s/ MARK GUSTAFSONMark Gustafson
Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130951 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MITCHELL STEVENSON and Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, BETHANY STEVENSON, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 130951 

 COA: 255973

 Grand Traverse CC: 03-022640-NH 

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD,

Intervening-Plaintiff, 

and 

MICHAEL A. NIZZI, D.O. and

MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1953

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Clifton Brown, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 3, 2011

 Filed: February 8, 2011

___________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In 2006, Clifton Brown was indicted on charges of possessing with intent to

distribute marijuana, more than five grams of cocaine base, and cocaine, 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(a)(1), and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime, 18

U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). After the District Court denied Brown’s motion to suppress

1

evidence, Brown pleaded guilty to all counts. The District Court initially sentenced

The HonorableRodneyW. Sippel, United States DistrictJudge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Lewis M. Blanton, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of

Missouri. 
him to 130 months in prison: an aggregate of 70 months for the drug offenses and a

consecutive 60-month term for the firearm offense. On Brown’s 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce sentence, the court amended its judgment to reduce the

aggregate sentence for the drug offenses to 60 months in prison, for a total prison

term of 120 months, the statutoryminimum. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i), (D)(ii);

21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(iii). Brown appeals. His counsel has moved to withdraw

and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the

District Court erred in denying the suppression motion and that the sentence imposed

was unreasonable. 

We reject these arguments. First, by pleading guilty, Brown waived the right

to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. See United States v. Arrellano, 213

F.3d 427, 430 (8th Cir. 2000) (noting that a defendant who pleads guilty waives all

suppression issues not expressly reserved by a conditional plea). Second, the District

Court’s imposition of the statutory minimum sentence was not unreasonable. See

United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc). Having

reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we

find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the District Court. 

______________________________

-2-
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 1707** 

SAMUEL M. JAMES ,
Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,
Defendant

– Appellee ,
and

ERIK SHINSEKI, Secretary, United States Veterans Affairs ,
Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:13

- cv
- 00861

- REP )

Submitted : November 18, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Samuel M. James, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Samuel M . James appeals the district court ’ s order
granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his complaint . We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

James v. United States , No. 3:13

- cv
- 00861

- REP (E.D. Va. May 23,

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED