alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR . R . 47 .5, th e co urt has determi ned that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d and is not precede nt except und er the limit ed c ircu mstance s set forthin5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 1 

### INTHE U NI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 60247

R O B E R T B R O C K , a n In d iv id u a l; M IC H E L L E B R O C K , a n In d iv id u a l, P e tit io n e r s ,
ve r s us UN I TE D S TA TE S DEP ART M ENT OF AGRI CULT URE, R e s p o n d e n t.

P et i t i on f

or R evi ew of an O r der of

t he Sec r et ar y, U n i t ed S t ates D epa rt m en t of A gri cul t u re A ni m alW el far e Act D oc ket N o. 04- 0015

B e fo r e J O L L Y , S M IT H , a n d B E N A V ID E S , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * United States Court of A pp eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 24, 2 009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 60247

Despitehis diligent efforts to make altern ate travel arra ngement s afte r experie nci ng 1 airlinean d weather delays thatw ere well beyond his control, petiti one rs’ co unse l was unable to appear for o ral argument. We permitte d b oth sides t o submit lette r b riefs after the schedu le d a rgu me n t date , partic u larlyt o a ll owth e ab se n t a tt orn ey tosu pp le me n t h iso th ersub mi ssion s. E speciallygiv en thesteep standard of revi ew, thi s is not a c lose case, and the petiti oners weren ot pr ej udic ed b y the inabilityof their co unse l t o pr esentoral argu ment. 2 A j u di ci al of

f i cer of t h e U n i te d S ta tes D epa rt m en t of A gri cul t u re det erm i ned t hat t he pet i t i oner s, R obe r t and M i c hel l e Bro c k, had vi ol at ed t he A ni m al W e l far e Ac t b y ac t i ng as de al e r s o f ani m al s w i t ho ut be i ng l i c e ns e d t o do s o . The Br o c k s p e t i t i o n f

o r r e v i e w. W e ha ve exam i n ed allof t h e subm i ssi on s, i n cl u di n g post- s ubm i s s i o n l et t er br i e fs t hatt he a t t o r ne ys w e r e pe r m i t t e d t o f i l e . W e al s o hav e c o ns ul t e d p e r t i n- 1
e n t p a r ts o f th e re c o r d a n d th e a p p lic a b le la w . T h e deci si on of the j u di ci al of f i cer i s s ou n d. Th ere i s s u bstanti al evi den ce o n a l l t h e e le m e n ts n e e d e d fo r a fin d in g o f v io la tio n , in c lu d in g , i nt e ral i a, t hat t he B r oc ks t oo k par t i n t he t r ansf er of t he subj ec t ani m al s; t hat t he t r ansf er w as f or c om pensa t i on o r pr of i t ; and t hat t he B r oc ks w er e “ deal er s. ” The c l ai m t hat th e tr a n s a c tio n s h a d n o e f fe c t o n in te r s ta te co m m e r c e is w ith o u t m e r it e v e n if i t w as no t w ai ve d. Be c a u s e t h e r e i s n o e r r o r o f fa c t o r l a w, t h e p e t i t i o n f o r r e v i e w i s DE NI ED
.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GARRY WADE CROSSLEY

,

Appellant,

v.

KAREN KAY CROSSLEY

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00104

- CV

Appeal from the

150th Judicial District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2021

- CI

- 04601 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We sustain Gary’s first issue in part, as d escribed in our opinion. We sustain Gary’s

third issue in part by rever sing the attorneys fees as awarded in the judgment below, but remand

for what might be equitable and just considering our ruling. We remand the case for further

proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 1 4 TH DAY OF MAY, 2024.

J EFF ALLEY

, Chie f Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, J J.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, as Chief Executive
Officer of Transcend Services, Inc., certifies that to the undersigneds knowledge, the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transcend Services, Inc. at the dates and
for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/s/ Larry G. Gerdes                    
|Larry G. Gerdes Chief Executive
Officer

Date: March 8, 2007
Exhibit 31.2
  Certification
      of principal financial officer
  I, James
M. Uveges, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
  (1)  I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Carrollton
Bancorp;
  (2) Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  (3) Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  (4)  The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and
have;
  (a) designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b) designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principals;
  (c) evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
  (d) disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  (5)  The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed to the registrant’s
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):
  (a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably like to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  (b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/
      James M. UvegesJames
      M. UvegesDate:
      March 20, 2008
              
              Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7491

JOE C. SPEARS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.

(CA-98-405-2) Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 9, 1999 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Joe C. Spears, Appellant Pro Se. Hazel Elizabeth Shaffer, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked “filed” on September 22, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on September 25, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Spears v. Angelone , No. CA-98-405-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 1998). * We deny Appellant’s motion for summary judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
280 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES AND GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

Washington, DC Commission Member (Chairman) Thomasina V. Rogers EX PAS III ...... 04/27/03

 Do........... Legal Counsel and Special Richard L. Huberman

Advisor

ES NA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Confidential Assistant Charlene R. Lucas GS SC 11 ...... ......

OFFICE OF THE 

COMMISSIONERS

 Do........... Commission Member Stuart E. Weisberg EX PAS IV ...... 04/27/05

 Do........... Confidential Assistant Chelsi D. Lewis GS SC 10 ...... ......

 Do........... Commission Member Gary L. Visscher EX PAS IV ...... 04/27/01

 Do........... Counsel to a Commissioner William M. Matchneer GS SC 15 ...... ......

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL 

COUNSEL

 Do........... General Counsel Career Incumbent ES CA ...... ...... ......

OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE 

DIRECTOR

 Do........... Executive Director Career Incumbent ES CA ...... ...... ......

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS

Washington, DC Director Vacant EX PAS III ...... ......

 Do........... General Counsel Career Incumbent ES CA ...... ...... ......

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

OFFICE OF NAVAHO AND HOPI INDIAN RELOCATION

OFFICE OF THE 

COMMISSIONER

Flagstaff, AZ Commissioner Vacant EX PAS IV ...... ......

 Do........... Executive Director Career Incumbent ES CA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Deputy Executive Director Career Incumbent ES CA ...... ...... ......

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

Washington, DC Director Janice R. Lachance EX PAS II 4 years 11/08/01

 Do........... Deputy Director John U. Sepulveda EX PAS III ...... ......

 Do........... Chief of Staff Mark E. Hunker ES NA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Senior Advisor to the Director Majorie C. Tarmey ES NA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Strategic Initiatives Coordinator Sandra P. Wallace ES TA ...... ...... 12/30/00
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         465,725
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,955,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                   610,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,645,284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,563,324
<PP&E>                                       7,844,615
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,186,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,287,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,419,788
<BONDS>                                     12,207,113
<COMMON>                                         2,395
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,657,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,287,170
<SALES>                                     20,123,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,108,702
<CGS>                                       12,679,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,507,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               791,517
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               123,399
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,610,590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,259,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (530,596)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,728,493
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .96
        

</TABLE>
```

[United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions (Plum Book), 1996]
[Legislative Branch]
[Government Printing Office]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

The Plum Book (United States Government Policy
        and Supporting Positions): 1996 EditionBRANCH: LEGISLATIVE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICELocationPosition TitleName of IncumbentPay PlanType of Appt.Level Grade or PayTenureExpiresWashington, DCPublic PrinterMichael F. DiMarioEXPASIII..................Washington, DCDeputy Public PrinterJames N. JoynerEXXSIV..................Washington, DCCongressional and Public Affairs OfficerFrancis W. BidenOTSC15..................Washington, DCSuperintendent of DocumentsWayne P. KelleySLXS............................Washington, DCGeneral CounselAnthony J. ZagamiSLXS............................Washington, DCInspector GeneralLewis L. SmallSLXS............................
```
0. 4;1""C'Al

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

OP 20-0292

MONTANA BOARD OF ENVIRONMENTAL

REVIEW,

Petitioner,

v.

MONTANA SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT, ROSEBUD COUNTY, HON.

KATHERINE M. BIDEGARAY,

Respondent.

FILED

MAY 2 9 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Suprerne Court

State nf Montana

ORDER

Petitioner Montana Board of Environmental Review (BER) seeks a writ of

supervisory control directing the Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Rosebud County, to

reverse its March 12, 2020 Order Denying Respondent Montana Board of Environmental

Review's Motion to Dismiss its Cause No. DV 19-34. BER had sought dismissal because

it contended it was not a necessary named party in the underlying action. BER further

requests a stay of proceedings in the District Court pending the outcome of this Petition.

Having reviewed the Petition and the challenged Order, this Court deems it

appropriate to obtain a summary response. Therefore, in accordance with M. R. App. P.

14(7),

IT IS ORDERED that the Sixteenth Judicial District Court and Montana

Environmental Center and Sierra Club, the Petitioners in the underlying matter, are each

granted thirty days from the date of this Order, to prepare, file, and serve a response(s) to

the petition for writ of supervisory control.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the proceedings in the underlying case are

STAYED pending this Court's decision on the Petition.

05/29/2020

Case Number: OP 20-0292
The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to counsel for

Petitioner, all counsel of record in the Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Rosebud Bow

County, Cause No. DV-19-34, and the Honorable Katherine M. Bidegaray, presiding

Judge.

Dated this bay of May, 2020.

2

Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3230 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3230

To direct the Food and Drug Administration, with respect to devices, to 
  enter into agreements with certain countries regarding methods and 
       approaches to harmonizing certain regulatory requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 14, 2011

   Mrs. McMorris Rodgers (for herself, Mr. Lance, Mr. Guthrie, Mrs. 
 Blackburn, Mr. Paulsen, Mr. Bass of New Hampshire, Mr. Latta, and Mr. 
   Shimkus) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Food and Drug Administration, with respect to devices, to 
  enter into agreements with certain countries regarding methods and 
       approaches to harmonizing certain regulatory requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping America Competitive Through 
Harmonization Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. HARMONIZATION OF DEVICE PREMARKET REVIEW, INSPECTION, AND 
              LABELING SYMBOLS; REPORT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 803(c) of the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 383(c)) is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(4) With respect to devices, the Secretary shall, to the maximum 
extent practicable, enter into agreements with those countries 
identified in clauses (i) and (ii) of section 802(b)(1)(A) regarding 
methods and approaches to harmonizing regulatory requirements for 
premarket review, inspections, and common international labeling 
symbols.''.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall submit to 
the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate 
and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of 
Representatives, a report listing the agreements entered into under 
section 803(c)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (as 
amended by subsection (a)) and itemizing the methods and approaches 
that have been harmonized pursuant to such section.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of Legato Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-28405, 333-02378, 333-94306
and 333-67031) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-64693) of our reports dated January
18, 1999 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Legato
Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998 on our audit of the
consolidated financial statement schedule, both of which reports are included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
San Jose, California
February 10, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               May-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    May-31-2000
<CASH>                                              721,111
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2,819,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                        172,722
<INVENTORY>                                      12,807,512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 17,813,352
<PP&E>                                           15,198,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2,263,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   35,182,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4,369,787
<BONDS>                                          18,345,079
<COMMON>                                              2,661
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                       13,902,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     35,182,714
<SALES>                                          23,479,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,724,365
<CGS>                                            17,350,142
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    24,247,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    172,893
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,707,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2,057,083
<INCOME-TAX>                                        800,490
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1,256,593
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.55

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 07, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 07, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17A0724. IRON CORE CAPITAL, LLC v. EUGENE HOUCHINS III.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.