alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit.htm


Exhibit 10.2







IMPERIUM ADVISERS, LLC


515 Madison Avenue


New York, NY 10022












January 5, 2012







Integrated BioPharma, Inc.


225 Long Avenue


Hillside, NJ 07205







Re:  Extension of Forbearance Agreement







Ladies and Gentlemen:







Reference is made to the Forbearance Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2011 (as amended, the “Forbearance Agreement”), by and between Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the “Company”) and Imperium Advisers, LLC, in its capacity as collateral agent (in such “Collateral Agent”) for itself and the Investors referred to therein.  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this letter shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Forbearance Agreement.







In consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby acknowledged, confirmed and agreed that all references in the Forbearance Agreement to “December 31, 2011” are hereby amended to mean “January 10, 2012”.







Furthermore, any interest payments which are due and payable to the Collateral Agent by the Company on or after the date of this letter through January 20, 2012 pursuant to terms of the 8% Senior Secured Notes of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. shall accrue and be due and payable on January 11, 2012.







Except as expressly modified pursuant hereto, no other changes or modifications to the Forbearance Agreement are intended or implied, and in all other respects, the Forbearance Agreement is hereby specifically ratified, restated and confirmed by the parties hereto as of the date hereof.







The effectiveness of this letter agreement shall be subject to the receipt by Collateral Agent of an original (or electronic copy) of this letter agreement duly executed and delivered by the Company.













	  	
Very truly yours,


	  	  
	  	
IMPERIUM ADVISERS, LLC,


	  	
as Collateral Agent on behalf of Investors


	  	  
	  	
By:  /s/ John Michaelson


	  	
Name:  John Michaelson


	  	
Title:  Manager













	
ACKNOWLEDGED, ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

	  
	  	  
	
INTEGRATED BIOPHARMA, INC.

	  
	  	  
	
By:  /s/ Dina L. Masi

	  
	
Name:  Dina L. Masi

	  
	
Title:  CFO
Exhibit 32.5


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership III-E ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 30th day of March, 2004.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP III-E
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                1844
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        34013
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (408)
<INVENTORY>                                          35112
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     72710
<PP&E>                                               23799
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (7646)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      147959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                40227
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             27000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (19645)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        147959
<SALES>                                              51169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     51169
<CGS>                                                29183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        29183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      9688
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    3044
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       9304
<INCOME-TAX>                                          3637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   5667
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                          5667
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0383. ANTHONY K. REESE v. R. H. TIPPINS, EVANS COUNTY

SHERIFF.

On August 1, 2014, the trial court granted Sheriff R. H. Tippins’s motion to

dismiss the petition for mandamus filed by Anthony K. Reese. Reese filed this

appeal. The Supreme Court, however, has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all

cases involving extraordinary remedies, including mandamus. See Ga. Const. of

1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (5); Ladzinske v. Allen, 280 Ga. 264 (626 SE2d 83)

(2006). Accordingly, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for

disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/19/2014

December 19, 2014
Order entered February 25, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00624-CV

MELISSA BREWER, Appellant

V.

COMPASS BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-02438-2019

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 23, 2021 unopposed fourth motion 

for an extension of time to file her brief on the merits.1 We GRANT the motion 

and extend the time to April 12, 2021. We caution appellant that a further 

extension request will be strongly disfavored.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

1 Counsel for appellant filed a notice of appearance on February 23, 2021. Prior to this date, appellant was 

proceeding pro se.
May 22, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF A.B., A CHILD

NO. 14-11-00281-CV

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the “FINAL ORDER UNDER UNIFORM 

INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT,” signed November 5, 2010, was heard on the 

transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in portion of the 

order requiring “RETROACTIVE CHILD SUPPORT” to the extent the trial court found

that the retroactive child support should be ordered “as of April 30, 2009”. We therefore 

REFORM that portion of the order to change the language “as of April 30, 2009” to “as 

of October 25, 2010.”

We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED except as modified in this 

judgment.

We order appellant to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this 

decision certified below for observance.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-51216

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAUL SANTANA-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:15-CR-92-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Raul Santana-Garcia raises 

an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 

198, 204-05 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 533 (2015). In Martinez-Lugo, 

782 F.3d at 204-05, we held that an enhancement under U.S.S.G. 

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) for a prior felony conviction of a drug trafficking offense is 

warranted regardless whether the conviction for the prior offense required 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 18, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-51216 Document: 00513721896 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
No. 15-51216

2

proof of remuneration or commercial activity. Accordingly, the Government’s 

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an 

extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district 

court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-51216 Document: 00513721896 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

JEFFREY MARK SN YD ER

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT
FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 90 DB 2019 (No. 65 RST 2019)

Attorney Registration No. 60932

( Philadelphia )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23 rd day of July

, 201 9 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated July 1 5 , 2019 , is approved and it is ORDERED that

Jeffrey Mark Snyder

, who has been on Administrative Suspension

, has never been

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that h e has the moral qualifications,

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth,

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Clifford B. WILLIAMS, Appellant.

No. 09-1020.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Sept. 29, 2010.

Donovan J. Cocas, Esq., Office of the United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA, John J. Valkovci, Jr., Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Johnstown, PA, for United States of America.

Douglas Sughrue, Esq., Crosby *&*Sughrue, Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellant.

Present: RENDELL, HARDIMAN, and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

MARJORIE O. RENDELL, Circuit Judge.

The foregoing motion to recall the mandate and for panel rehearing is hereby granted. The Court’s order, filed February 24, 2010, granting summary action is hereby vacated. The Clerk will appoint new counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. After review of the record, new counsel will have the opportunity to file a response to the government’s motion for summary action.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER
31, 1999 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         257,312                 230,807
<SECURITIES>                                   320,341                 306,386
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,696                  58,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               633,349                 595,565
<PP&E>                                       3,803,639               3,803,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                 778,690                 713,396
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,658,298               3,685,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,099                  62,934
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,569,199               3,622,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,658,298               3,685,808
<SALES>                                        426,042                 420,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               455,885                 698,995
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               258,772                 767,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                197,113                (68,933)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            197,113                (68,933)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   197,113                (68,933)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      11.41                  (3.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.41                  (3.99)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3248 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3248

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 112 South 5th Street in Saint Charles, Missouri, as the ``Lance 
            Corporal Drew W. Weaver Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 24, 2011

   Mr. Akin (for himself, Mr. Clay, Mr. Carnahan, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. 
   Cleaver, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mr. Long, Mrs. Emerson, and Mr. 
 Luetkemeyer) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 112 South 5th Street in Saint Charles, Missouri, as the ``Lance 
            Corporal Drew W. Weaver Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL DREW W. WEAVER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 112 South 5th Street in Saint Charles, Missouri, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Drew W. Weaver Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Drew W. Weaver Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2791 

To make clear that an agency outside of the Department of Health and 

Human Services may not designate, appoint, or employ special consultants, fellows, or other employees under subsection (f) or (g) of section 

207 of the Public Health Service Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2011 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To make clear that an agency outside of the Department 

of Health and Human Services may not designate, appoint, or employ special consultants, fellows, or other 

employees under subsection (f) or (g) of section 207 

of the Public Health Service Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health and Human 

5 Services Hiree Clarification Act of 2011’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2791 IH

1 SEC. 2. EMPLOYMENT OF SPECIAL CONSULTANTS AND FEL2 LOWS FOR THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 207(f) of the Public 

4 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 209(f)) is amended by add5 ing at the end the following: ‘‘This subsection and sub6 section (g) do not authorize the designation, appointment, 

7 or employment of any special consultant, fellow, or other 

8 employee by an agency outside of the Department of 

9 Health and Human Services.’’. 

10 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.—Section 207(h) of 

11 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 209(h)) is 

12 amended— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘subsection (f)’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘subsection (g)’’; and 

15 (2) by striking ‘‘subsection (e)’’ and inserting 

16 ‘‘subsection (f)’’. 

17 (c) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this 

18 section apply with respect to special consultants, fellows, 

19 and other employees appointed on or after the date of the 

20 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,908
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (952)
<INVENTORY>                                     15,141
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,353
<PP&E>                                          36,795
<DEPRECIATION>                                (25,242)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,970
<BONDS>                                        114,652
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           45,287
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                         6,799
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,728
<SALES>                                         26,493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,493
<CGS>                                           26,149
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (39,616)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (39,616)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (39,616)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY

#### Omar S. Zaki v. Vincent Abell

September 17, 1984

Case No. (Law) 24926

By JUDGE THOMAS R. MONROE

Under advisement is the Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment. The Court has carefully considered the able arguments and memoranda of counsel.

On March 7, 1984, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Judgment. In the Affidavit required to be filed with the Motion for Judgment under Section 8.01-329, *Code of Virginia,*the Plaintiff alleged that the Defendant was a non-resident of Virginia and transacted business in Virginia. The pleadings, pursuant to Section 8.01- 328.1, were formally served upon the Secretary of the Commonwealth who, pursuant to Section 8.01-329, forwarded a copy to the Defendant, Vincent Abell. When Defendant failed to file an answer in Arlington Circuit Court default judgment was entered against him on April 20, 1984. On June 12, 1984, Defendant filed his Motion to Vacate Default Judgment.

The Defendant contends that the default judgment should be vacated because its entry is based upon a clerical mistake of the kind contemplated by Section 8.01- 428 of the *Code of Virginia.*This Court agrees. Section 8.01-428 permits the Court to vacate a default judgment in order to correct errors regardless of who made them, *Lamb*v. *Commonwealth, 222*Va. 61 (1981); *Dorn*v. *Dorn, 222*Va. 288 (1981). In the *233instant case the Defendant alleged that his answer was inadvertantly filed in the Circuit Court of Fairfax County. The record shows that such answer was filed on April 6, 1984.

It has been held that an attorney’s failure to prepare an order for entry by the court, if deemed an "oversight," could be corrected by a *nunc pro tunc*order. *Cutshaw*v. *Cutshaw,*220 Va. 638, 261 S.E.2d 52 (1979). The record before this Court clearly shows such "oversight" occurred as required by *Cutshaw.*The *Cutshaw*Court further held that Section 8.01-428(B) of the *Code of Virginia*authorized the Court to correct these clerical errors "when the record clearly supports such corrections." Cutshaw, at 641.

The record in the instant case clearly established that an error was made and that to deny Defendant the relief he requests would negate the legislative intent of Section 8.01-428(B). Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment is granted.