alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         803,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,087,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,989,000
<PP&E>                                       2,917,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,487,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,494,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          697,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,691,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,494,000
<SALES>                                      7,251,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,251,000
<CGS>                                        4,828,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,828,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                20,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                736,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            710,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   710,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND

#### Schoonover's Administrator v. John A. Russell and Vickie Lynn Terry

February 3, 1987

By JUDGE T. J. MARKOW

Before me is the demurrer which has been briefed and argued by counsel. It says that the defendants owed plaintiff’s decedent no duty, that no proximate cause has been alleged, that there is no tort of "bad faith” as alleged by the plaintiff, and that the facts pled do not support a claim for punitive damages.

I find that the defendants owed the plaintiff no duty and, therefore, are not liable to him, even if all of the other allegations are true. Accordingly, I will enter an order sustaining the demurrer.

In the motion for judgment, plaintiff alleges that the defendant Terry was an employee of Blue Cross/Blue Shield, a health insurance carrier which covered Schoonover. Dr. Russell was a consultant to Blue Cross/Blue Shield. Schoonover was alleged to have been mentally ill and confined in a psychiatric hospital. Blue Cross/Blue Shield paid for his care to a point, but when requested by the hospital to pay for further services, it refused, allegedly, on the advice of Nurse Terry and Dr. Russell, which was given negligently, grossly negligently, willfully, wantonly and with bad faith. Schoonover was then released by the hospital and approximately two months later committed suicide because he did not receive the additional treatment for which the hospital requested Blue Cross/Blue Shield to pay. For purposes of the demurrer, these allegations are accepted as true.

*321There is no allegation establishing anything more than that in the course of their duties owed Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Terry and Russell committed acts which plaintiff contends were improper. Nothing of which I am aware, nor of which 1 have been informed, imposes any duties to Schoonover by either of these people. Their duties were owed to Blue Cross/Blue Shield. Were the court to hold otherwise, every employee of a company having anything to do with the act or omission of that employer which is alleged to be the basis of a cause of action would be a potential defendant For example, designers in an auto company would be defendants in products liability cases involving negligent design of an automobile which resulted in injury to a plaintiff. (Of course, this hypothesis is somewhat different from here, as it would be controlled by the U.C.C.; nevertheless, I believe it accurately illustrates the point.)

Because of my decision here, I need not reach the other grounds of the demurrer.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES

|                                  |  |                 |  |            |     |  
|--------------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ---------- | --- | -
|                                  |  |                 |  | Percentage
|Subsidiary                        |  | Incorporated In |  | Owned     
|                                  |  |                 |  |           
|Medicis, The Dermatology Company® |  | Delaware        |  |            | 100 | %
|                                  |  |                 |  |            |     |  
|Dermavest, Inc.                   |  | Nevada          |  |            | 100 | %
|                                  |  |                 |  |            |     |  
|Medicis Manufacturing Corporation |  | Delaware        |  |            | 100 | %
|                                  |  |                 |  |            |     |  
|GenDerm Corporation               |  | Delaware        |  |            | 100 | %
|                                  |  |                 |  |            |     |  
|Medicis Canada, Ltd               |  | Canada          |  |            | 100 | %
|                                  |  |                 |  |            |     |  
|Ucyclyd Pharma, Inc.              |  | Maryland        |  |            | 100 | %
|                                  |  |                 |  |            |     |  
|Ascent Pediatrics, Inc.           |  | Delaware        |  |            | 100 | %
|                                  |  |                 |  |            |     |  
|Medicis Aesthetics Holdings Inc.  |  | Delaware        |  |            | 100 | %
|                                  |  |                 |  |            |     |  
|Medicis Aesthetics Inc.           |  | Delaware        |  |            | 100 | %
|                                  |  |                 |  |            |     |  
|Dermavest Swedish Holdings AB     |  | Sweden          |  |            | 100 | %
|                                  |  |                 |  |            |     |  
|HA North American Sales AB        |  | Sweden          |  |            | 100 | %
|                                  |  |                 |  |            |     |  
|Medicis Aesthetics Canada Ltd.    |  | Canada          |  |            | 100 | %
Motion Granted; Abatement Order filed December 11, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00172

- CV

____________ DR. JOEL JOSELEVITZ , Appellant

V. CAROL ROANE, INDIVID UALLY, AND COX MEDIA GROUP , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 66926



### ABATEMENT ORDER

On December 4, 2018
, appellant filed a third motion to extend time to file his reply brief noting that the parties were engaged in discussion to settle the issues on appeal. The motion is granted. Accordingly, we issue the following order.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s
active docket until March 1, 2019 . The appeal will be reinstated on this court’ s active docket at that time, or when the parties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or otherdispositive motion. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate

the appeal filed by any party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its o wn motion.

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1999 and the Statement of Operations for
the Year Ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          32,212
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,987
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,199
<PP&E>                                       4,239,485
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,046,143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 268,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              429
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     268,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   268,541
<SALES>                                        133,177
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,271
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               108,635
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,636
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,636
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,636
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.84


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.62


 





SECOND AMENDMENT TO UNSECURED PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


This Second Amendment to
Unsecured Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of November 13, 2017, by and between
Amyris, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Bolding Investment S.A. (the “Investor”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, on February
12, 2016, the Company issued to the Investor an Unsecured Promissory Note in the principal amount of $2,000,000 (as previously
amended, the “Note”), which Note is attached hereto as Exhibit A.


 


WHEREAS, on May
15, 2017, the Company and the Investor amended the Note to extend the maturity date of the Note from May 15, 2017 to November 15,
2017.


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Investor desire to further amend the Note as set forth herein.


 


WHEREAS, pursuant
to Section 8.7 of the Note, the Note may be amended with the written consent of the Company and the Investor.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	Extension of Maturity Date. The definition of “Maturity Date” in Section
1 of the Note is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



 


“Maturity
Date” means December 31, 2017.


 


		2.	Full Force and Effect. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms
of the Note shall remain in full force and effect.



 


		3.	Integration. This Amendment and the Note constitute the entire agreement and understanding
of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersede all prior understandings and agreements, whether oral or
written, between or among the parties hereto with respect to the specific subject matter hereof.



 


		4.	Counterparts; Facsimile. This Amendment may be executed in one (1) or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Amendment
may be executed and delivered by facsimile, or by email in portable document format (.pdf), and delivery of any signature page
by such method will be deemed to have the same effect as if the original signature had been delivered to the other party.



 


[Remainder
of Page intentionally left blank]


 






     


    


    

 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


	AMYRIS, INC.	 
	By:	/s/ John Melo	 
	Name:	John Melo	 
	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer	 



 


 


 


[Signature Page to
Second Amendment to Unsecured Promissory Note]


 



     


    


    

 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 





	BIOLDING INVESTMENT S.A.	 
	By:	Jean Paul C. Soulie	 
	Name:	Director	 
	Title: 	 	 



 


 


	 	/s/ Jean Paul C. Soulie	8/11/2017	 



 


 


 


[Signature Page to Second Amendment to Unsecured Promissory Note]


 



     


    


    

 


Exhibit A


 


See attached.
EX-4.22



 Exhibit 4.22 
  

			
	To:	 	ABN AMRO Bank N.V. as Agent for itself and each of the other parties to the Facility Agreement referred to below
		
	From:	 	KNOT Shuttle Tankers 32 AS (as Borrower) Knutsen
		 	NYK Offshore Tankers AS (as Guarantor) KNOT
		 	Offshore Partners LP
		 	KNOT Shuttle Tankers AS

 Dated: 
 Dear Sirs, 

USD 60,000,000 Term Loan Facility Agreement dated 27 June, 2017 as amended by an amendment agreement dated 15 December, 2017 (the
“Facility Agreement”) 
  

	1.	We refer to the Facility Agreement. This accession letter (the ‘Accession Letter’) shall take effect as an Accession Letter for the purposes of the Facility Agreement. Terms defined in the Facility
Agreement have the same meaning in this Accession Letter unless given a different meaning in this Accession Letter. 

  

	2.	KNOT Offshore Partners LP (‘KNOP’) and KNOT Shuttle Tankers AS (‘KNOT ST’ and together with KNOP; the ‘Replacement Guarantors’) agree to become Replacement Guarantors
with respect to all amounts outstanding under the Agreement and to be bound by the terms of the Agreement as Guarantors and Obligors pursuant to Clause 28.2 (Drop Down) of the Agreement. 


 

	3.	KNOP’s and KNOT ST’s administrative details are as follows: 

 Address: 2 Queens Road,
Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire AB15 4YB, United Kingdom/ Smedasundet 40, 5529 Haugesund, Norway 
 Fax: 44(0) 1224 624891 Attention: CEO/CFO 

 

	4.	We confirm that the Repeating Representations are made by each of the Borrower, the Guarantor and the Replacement Guarantors on the date of this Accession Letter and that all Repeating Representations are true in all
material respects on that date. 

  

	5.	This Accession Letter is governed by Norwegian law and KNOP has appointed KNOT ST as its process agents in respect of this Accession Letter and the other Finance Documents. 


THIS ACCESSION LETTER has been signed on behalf of the Guarantor, the Borrower and the Replacement Guarantors and is delivered on the date stated
above. 








			
		
	Signed	  	/s/ Karl Gerhard Bråstein Dahl
		  	Name: Karl Gerhard Bråstein Dahl
		  	Position: Director
		  	KNOT Shuttle Tankers 32 AS
		
	Signed	  	/s/ Karl Gerhard Bråstein Dahl
		  	Name: Karl Gerhard Bråstein Dahl
		  	Position: Senior Vice President
		  	Knutsen NYK Offshore Tankers AS
		
	Signed	  	/s/ John A. Costain
		  	Name: John A. Costain
		  	Position: Chief Executive Officer
		  	KNOT Offshore Partners LP
		
	Signed	  	/s/ Karl Gerhard Bråstein Dahl
		  	Name: Karl Gerhard Bråstein Dahl
		  	Position: Director
		  	KNOT Shuttle Tankers AS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1630
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          8025
<OTHER-SE>                                        8750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       976
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1793
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1793)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1793)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.002)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      23.2











**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





The
      Board
      of Directors


The
      Reader’s Digest Association, Inc.:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
      33-37434, 33-56883, 333-57789, 333-42726, 333-105325, 333-105326, and
      333-105327) on Form S-8 of The Reader's Digest Association, Inc. of our report
      dated August 30, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of The
      Reader's Digest Association, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2005, and
      the
      related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash
      flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2005, which
      report appears in the June 30, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of The Reader's
      Digest Association, Inc.




/s/
      KPMG
      LLP




New
      York,
      New York


August
      17, 2006
[ARTICLE] 5
[MULTIPLIER]   1,000
Part II.  Other information,   Item 6a.

                                   CNET, INC.
             STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended          Nine Months Ended
                                                      September 30,                September 30,
                                               ---------------------------  ---------------------------
                                                   1997          1996           1997          1996
                                               ------------- -------------  ------------- -------------
<S>                                            <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>
Net loss. . . . .  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  ($6,152,235)  ($4,679,173)  ($14,024,388) ($12,698,175)

Primary shares outstanding:
  Weighted average shares outstanding
     during the period:
     Preferred. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          --          62,717           --       3,811,746
     Common . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    13,764,487    13,145,132     13,479,021     6,192,785
  Shares issued and stock option
     and warrants granted in accordance
     with SAB No. 83. . . . . . . . . . . . .          --           8,888           --         540,211
  Common stock equivalent shares. . . . . . .          --            --             --            --
                                               ------------- -------------  ------------- -------------
Shares used in calculating per share data. . .   13,764,487    13,216,737     13,479,021    10,544,742
                                               ============= =============  ============= =============
Primary net loss per common stock
  and common stock equivalent shares . . . . .       ($0.45)       ($0.35)        ($1.04)       ($1.20)
                                               ============= =============  ============= =============
</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3090 

To terminate the Economic Development Administration, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 4, 2011 

Mr. POMPEO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To terminate the Economic Development Administration, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘EDA Elimination Act 

5 of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD7 MINISTRATION. 

8 (a) TERMINATION.—The Economic Development Ad9 ministration is terminated. 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3090 IH

1 (b) REPEAL.—The Public Works and Economic De2 velopment Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3121 et seq.) is re3 pealed. 

4 (c) CONCLUSION OF BUSINESS.—The Secretary of 

5 Commerce shall take such actions as may be necessary 

6 and appropriate to conclude the outstanding affairs of the 

7 Economic Development Administration, including disposi8 tions of personnel, assets, and obligations. 

9 (d) LIMITATION ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.— 

10 This section may not be construed to prevent the expendi11 ture of any funds received before the effective date of this 

12 Act. Such funds shall be subject to the laws and regula13 tions that would have applied to the funds if this section 

14 had not been enacted. 

15 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

16 This Act shall take effect on the first day of the first 

17 fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this 

18 Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order entered July 29, 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00648

- CR

OSVALDO LEIJA

- BALDERAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13

- 32837

- W



### O RDER

The Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record in this

appeal within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE