alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                       455
<INVENTORY>                                     38,628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,651
<PP&E>                                          22,733
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,417
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,372
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,150
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,552)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,285
<SALES>                                        155,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,249
<CGS>                                           85,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,894
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,951
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,943
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,943
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                             Transbotics Corporation

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the Transbotics
Corporation (the "Company") certify that the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the
Company for the fiscal period ending November 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Dated: October 20, 2005

                                        /s/Claude Imbleau
                                        Claude Imbleau
                                        President and CEO
                                        (principal executive officer and
                                        principal accounting officer)

     ** This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                       406
<INVENTORY>                                     37,070
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,079
<PP&E>                                          22,149
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,167)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,470
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,441)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,317
<SALES>                                        144,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,925
<CGS>                                           83,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,824
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,242
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,371
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,871
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,871
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3263 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3263

  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to allow the storage and 
 conveyance of nonproject water at the Norman project in Oklahoma, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 2011

Mr. Cole (for himself and Mr. Lankford) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to allow the storage and 
 conveyance of nonproject water at the Norman project in Oklahoma, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lake Thunderbird Efficient Use Act 
of 2011''.

SEC. 2. NORMAN PROJECT, OKLAHOMA.

    Public Law 86-529 (74 Stat. 225) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:

``SEC. 10. LAKE THUNDERBIRD.

    ``(a) In General.--If the Secretary of the Interior determines that 
there is enough excess capacity in the reservoir on the Little River 
known as `Lake Thunderbird' that nonproject water can be stored in Lake 
Thunderbird, the Secretary of the Interior may, in accordance with the 
reclamation laws, amend an existing contract, or enter into 1 or more 
new contracts, with the Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District 
for the storage and conveyance of nonproject water in Norman project 
facilities to augment municipal and industrial supplies for the cities 
served by the Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District.
    ``(b) Costs.--If any additional infrastructure is needed to enable 
the storage and conveyance of non-project water in Norman project 
facilities under subsection (a) or any other provision of this Act, the 
costs of constructing, operating, and maintaining the infrastructure 
shall be the responsibility of the non-Federal entity contracting with 
the Secretary of the Interior for storage and conveyance rights.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECT.

    Nothing in this Act or an amendment made by this Act authorizes any 
expansion of the storage capacity of Lake Thunderbird.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed March 16, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00739-CV

____________

IN RE WARRIOR ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-35023

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-35023

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

Relator petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy 

Court for the Southern District of Texas, under cause number 20-35816. Because a 

stay is automatically effected by Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, when this 

court received notice of relator’s bankruptcy filing, on December 7, 2020, all 

proceedings in this mandamus proceeding were suspended. See Tex. R. App. P. 

8.2. 

On February 3, 2021, real party in interest filed a motion to reinstate the 

mandamus proceeding pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.3(a)

because the bankruptcy stay has been terminated. We grant the Rule 8.3 motion to 

reinstate, and the appeal is reinstated. 
However, the Court must now abate the case pursuant to Rule 7.2(b), which 

mandates that when the respondent in an original proceeding under Rule 52 ceases 

to hold office this court must allow the respondent’s successor to consider the 

original party’s decision regarding relator’s request for relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 

7.2(b); 52. Therefore, this mandamus proceeding is abated for a period of thirty 

days from the date of this order, at which time the new presiding judge of the 80th

District Court, Harris County, Texas, shall advise the Court of the action taken on 

relator’s request. The Court will then consider a motion to reinstate or dismiss this 

proceeding, as appropriate.

Furthermore, the court reminds all counsel that motions must be 

accompanied by a certificate stating the filing party conferred, or made a 

reasonable attempt to confer, with all other parties about the merits of the motion 

and whether those parties oppose the motion. Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a)(5). 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of netGuru, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 13, 2002                            By:  /s/ Amrit K. Das
                                                         ----------------------
                                                         Amrit K. Das
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of netGuru, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 13, 2002                            By: /s/ Bruce K. Nelson
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Bruce K. Nelson
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3233 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to exclude the value of 

vehicles used for household transportation, or to obtain or continue 

employment, from the resource limitation applicable to determine eligibility to receive supplemental nutrition assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 14, 2011 

Mr. PETERS (for himself, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. 

DINGELL, Mr. ELLISON, Ms. TSONGAS, Mr. STARK, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. OLVER, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. 

MORAN, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, 

Ms. KAPTUR, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. WATT, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia, Ms. DELAURO, Ms. 

EDWARDS, Mr. HOLT, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. TONKO, Ms. PINGREE of 

Maine, Ms. RICHARDSON, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. 

COURTNEY, Mr. WELCH, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. COHEN, Mr. PERLMUTTER, 

Mr. CARNAHAN, and Mr. LUJA ́N) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to exclude 

the value of vehicles used for household transportation, 

or to obtain or continue employment, from the resource 

limitation applicable to determine eligibility to receive 

supplemental nutrition assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3233 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminate Auto Test 

3 (EAT) Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

5 Section 5(g)(2) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 

6 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2014(g)(2)) is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (B)— 

8 (A) in clause (iii) by adding ‘‘and’’ at the 

9 end, 

10 (B) by striking clause (iv), and 

11 (C) by redesignating clause (v) as clause 

12 (iv), and 

13 (2) in subparagraph (C)— 

14 (A) in clause (ii) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

15 end, 

16 (B) in clause (iii) by striking the period at 

17 the end and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and 

18 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(iv) used for household transpor20 tation or to obtain or continue employ21 ment.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
| Name                                                                 |   | Place of Incorporation                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                                                                 |   |                                  |
| Green      Agriculture Holding Corporation                           |   | New      Jersey                       |
| Shaanxi      TechTeam Jinong Humic Acid Product Co., Ltd.            |   | People's      Republic of China       |
| Xi’an      Jintai Agriculture Technology Development Company   |   | People's      Republic of China       |
| Xi’an      Hu County Yuxing Agriculture Technology Development |   | People’s      Republic of China |
| Co.,      Ltd.                                                       |   |                                  |
| Beijing      Gufeng Chemical Products Co., Ltd.                      |   | People's      Republic of China       |
| Beijing      Tianjuyuan Fertilizer Co., Ltd.                         |   | People's      Republic of China       |

----
24
Sets of HATTELAND Supply Contract

Navigation Technology Solution for Hyundai Heavy Industries


 


Project:
24 Sets of HATTELAND for Hyundai Heavy Industries


Ordering:
Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.


Contract
No. (HHI): EM146M6013


Project
No. (HHI): SH744 9H35DF – G/E


Price:
132,000,000 Won


Payment
Terms


 


	Product	 	Qt.	 	Installation Date	 	Price	 
	POS FOR MARITIME MULTI COMPUTER (BA5737-4480-01)	 	4	 	02/10/2015	 	 	20,000,000 Won	 
	POS FOR MARITIME MULTI COMPUTER (BA5737-4480-01)	 	4	 	03/19/2015	 	 	20,000,000 Won	 
	POS FOR MARITIME MULTI COMPUTER (BA5737-4480-01)	 	4	 	06/19/2015	 	 	20,000,000 Won	 
	POS FOR MARITIME MULTI COMPUTER (BA5737-4480-01)	 	4	 	08/10/2015	 	 	20,000,000 Won	 
	POS FOR MARITIME MULTI COMPUTER (BA5737-4480-01)	 	4	 	10/26/2015	 	 	20,000,000 Won	 
	POS FOR MARITIME MULTI COMPUTER (BA5737-4480-01)	 	4	 	01/05/2016	 	 	20,000,000 Won	 



 


Installation
Date: February 10th 2015 – January 5th 2016 


 


Hyundai
Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (“The Customer”) and e-MARINE Inc. (“The Supplier”) agree to execute all matters
for [24 Sets of HATTELAND]


 


June
3rd 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           9,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                       955
<INVENTORY>                                     14,364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,753
<PP&E>                                         186,744
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,130
<BONDS>                                        107,055
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           10,175
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           185
<OTHER-SE>                                     116,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   306,679
<SALES>                                          7,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,015
<CGS>                                            4,258
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,310
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,205
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,386
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,819
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,819
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 29, 2015

No. 04-14-00676-CR

Gary Lynn BAKER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR4875

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s brief is due March 2, 2015.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24d


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, a director of
WHOLESOME & HEARTY FOODS, INC., an Oregon corporation (the "Company"), hereby
constitutes and appoints RICHARD C. DIETZ his true and lawful attorney-in-fact
and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in
his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Form 10-K
Annual Report, with all exhibits and amendments thereto, of Wholesome & Hearty
Foods, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and to file this Power
of Attorney and the Form 10-K, and all exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., granting unto said attorney-in-fact and
agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each of said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute
or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


                                   Dated this 3rd day of December, 1996.

                                   /s/MICHAEL L. RAY  , Director
                                   -------------------
                                   Michael L. Ray
```

[Constitution of the United States of America:  Analysis, and Interpretation - 1992 Edition ]
[Amendments to the Constitution]
[Twenty-Sixth Amendment - Reduction of Voting Age Qualification]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

[[Page 1995]]

 
                         TWENTY-SIXTH AMENDMENT
                               __________
 
                  REDUCTION OF VOTING AGE QUALIFICATION

  Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are 
eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged 
by the United States or by any State on account of age.
  Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by 
appropriate legislation.

                       THE EIGHTEEN-YEAR-OLD VOTE

        In extending the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in 1970\1\ Congress 
included a provision lowering the age qualification to vote in all 
elections, federal, state, and local, to 18.\2\ In a divided decision, 
the Supreme Court held that Congress was empowered to lower the age 
qualification in federal elections, but voided the application of the 
provision in all other elections as beyond congressional power.\3\ 
Confronted thus with the possibility that they might have to maintain 
two sets of registration books and go to the expense of running separate 
election systems for federal elections and for all other elections, the 
States were receptive to the proposing of an Amendment by Congress to 
establish a minimum age qualification at 18 for all elections, and 
ratified it promptly.\4\

        \1\79 Stat. 437, as extended and amended by 84 Stat. 314, 42 
U.S.C. Sec. 1971 et seq.
        \2\Title 3, 84 Stat. 318, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1973bb.
        \3\Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112 (1970).
        \4\S. Rep. No. 26, 92d Cong., 1st Sess. (1971); H.R. Rep. No. 
37, 92d Cong., 1st Sess. (1971).
```
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK

#### Commonwealth of Virginia v. Bradley Peirsol

May 18, 1983

By JUDGE EDWARD L. RYAN, JR.

Statements made during a custodial interrogation and while intoxicated are not *per se*involuntary or inadmissible. The test is whether the defendant’s "will was overborne" or whether the statements were the "product of a rational intellect and a free will." *Yarborough*v. *Commonwealth,*217 Va. 971 (1977) (citing United States Supreme Court and Circuit Court of Appeal cases).

The evidence shows generally that defendant was intoxicated but there was also sufficient evidence to show that defendant’s will was *not*overborne.

Defendant’s motion to suppress is overruled.