alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2805 

To amend section 220 of the Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act of 1994 to make permanent the amendments made by such 

section. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 5, 2011 

Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 220 of the Immigration and Nationality 

Technical Corrections Act of 1994 to make permanent 

the amendments made by such section. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Doctors for Under5 served Areas in America Act’’. 


tjames on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2805 IH

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF FOREIGN COUNTRY RESIDENCE RE2 QUIREMENT WITH RESPECT TO INTER3 NATIONAL MEDICAL GRADUATES. 

4 Section 220(c) of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Technical Corrections Act of 1994 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note) 

6 is amended by striking ‘‘this Act and before September 

7 30, 2012.’’ and inserting ‘‘this Act.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report of Braintech, Inc. (the Company ) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward A. White, the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Edward A. White                               
|Edward A. White                                   
|Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer
|March 18, 2008
1Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.

-1-

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________

No.02-51170

SUMMARY CALENDAR

_________________________

JAMES EDWARD PRICE

Plaintiff - Appellant

 v.

COUNTY COURT CLERK OF HILL COUNTY TEXAS, Individually and in

his/her official capacity

Defendant - Appellee

______________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, Waco Division

(W-02-CV-133)

______________________________________________________________________________

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

James Edward Price, federal prisoner # 82392-80, appeals the dismissal with prejudice of

his in forma pauperis (“IFP”) 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit. For the following reasons, we affirm the

decision of the district court.

I.
-2-

The district court dismissed appellant’s suit as frivolous after determining it was barred by

Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Price argues that his case is not barred by Heck because

it concerns only the county clerk’s dissemination of false information regarding a state conviction,

rather than implicating the validity of his federal conviction or sentence. We review a district

court’s determination that an IFP suit is frivolous for an abuse of discretion. See Siglar v.

Hightower, 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997).

II.

Price cannot avoid the Heck bar by arguing that his cause of action is based solely on the

dissemination of the allegedly false information because, to establish a 42 U.S.C. § 1983

defamation claim, Price must demonstrate “a stigma plus an infringement of some other interest.”

San Jacinto Sav. & Loan v. Kacal, 928 F.2d 697, 701 (5th Cir. 1991). The only mention of injury

found in either Price’s brief or his complaint is the use of the allegedly false information in his

federal sentencing. Accordingly, Price’s complaint implicitly challenges the duration of his

confinement because, if the fact of his prior conviction was false, as he contends, that fact would

render Price’s federal sentence invalid. Therefore, under Heck, Price’s argument that he was

damaged by the dissemination of false information by the county must be barred, because he has

not shown that his sentence “has been reversed on direct appeal, expunged by executive order,

declared invalid by a state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or called into question

by a federal court’s issuance of a writ of habeas corpus.” See Heck, 512 U.S. at 487. 

III.

For the foregoing reasons, the district court’s decision to dismiss Price’s complaint as

frivolous because it is barred by Heck is AFFIRMED.
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D 20 2 3

- 2801 Lower Tribunal No. 11

- C F

- 0 5 0 7 0

_____________________________ A LE JA NDRO B ENABE

- R IVERA , Appellant ,
v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Orange County

. Luis F. Calderon , Judge.
Au gust 13, 2024
PER CURIAM

. AFFIRMED

. TRAVER , C

. J. , and STARGEL and WHITE , JJ., c oncur.

Dane K. Chase , of Chase Law Florida, P. A. , Saint Petersburg , for Appellant

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire , Assistant Attorney General, Dayt ona Beach , for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements:

     1.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-42634) pertaining to the
          Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Plan

     2.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-32961) pertaining to the
          Second Amended and Restated Employee Stock Option Plan

     3.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-72614) pertaining to the
          Employee Stock Purchase Plan

     4.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-99164) pertaining to the SIG
          Holdings, Inc. 1992 Long Term Incentive Plan

     5.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-96293) pertaining to the
          Amended and Restated Directors Stock Option Plan

     6.   Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 33-77028 and Form S-3 No.
          333-86666) pertaining to the shelf registration of securities of
          Delphi Financial Group, Inc.

     7.   Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-118052) pertaining to the
          registration of Class A Common Stock of Delphi Financial Group, Inc.

of our reports dated February 23, 2006, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedules of Delphi Financial Group, Inc., Delphi
Financial Group, Inc. management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Delphi Financial Group, Inc., included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.


                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 15, 2006
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Mark Eugene Engle

No. 06-19-00050-CV

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED JUNE 19, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132861 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132861 COA: 263050 Genesee CC: 04-013883-FC; 04-013837-FC MALCOLM ERIC LANG, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0523 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ernest W. Vann, Appellant.

Submitted March 17, 2008;

decided March 25, 2008

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no civil appeal lies from the order of the Appellate Division entered in this criminal proceeding *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5601; CPL 450.90).
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2943 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2011 

Received 

AN ACT 

To extend the program of block grants to States for temporary assistance for needy families and related programs through December 31, 2011. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2943 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Short-Term TANF 

3 Extension Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR 

5 NEEDY FAMILIES PROGRAM AND RELATED 

6 PROGRAMS THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2011. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Activities authorized by part A of 

8 title IV and section 1108(b) of the Social Security Act 

9 (other than under subsections (a)(3) and (b) of section 

10 403 of such Act) shall continue through December 31, 

11 2011, in the manner authorized for fiscal year 2011, and 

12 out of any money in the Treasury of the United States 

13 not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appropriated 

14 such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. Grants 

15 and payments may be made pursuant to this authority on 

16 a quarterly basis through the first quarter of fiscal year 

17 2012 at the level provided for such activities for the cor18 responding quarter of fiscal year 2011. 

19 (b) MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT.—Section 409(a)(7) 

20 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 609(a)(7)) is amend21 ed— 

22 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or 2012’’ 

23 and inserting ‘‘2012, or 2013’’; and 

24 (2) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking ‘‘2011’’ 

25 and inserting ‘‘2012’’. 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2943 RDS 

1 SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

2 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

3 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

4 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

5 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

6 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

7 by the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, pro8 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

9 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AlJ8TlN 

._ 

,;,. 
EtonQrab&8 John .R. Taylor, Piage 8. 
APPROVEDmY 18, 1940 

ATTQRNEY GENERAL OB !f.E%Ag 

Xt 18 8Via8nt fmm Ar6ia1~.6008 that the Legielature 

zeg8r4eU the u8e et ga6 for Ught or rue1 a8 bsiq it8 hl&est 

or most valuable use fm@ the 8ooial point of view and that 

the Legl8lature fur this reman 608b 5everely restrlotwl the 

U80 ror light 

So0 ~3. b. Esi3, 

gas may be 

eubio fee* 

reoibtie. burns& oar@on blaak * 

Ilatural gam11~8 8~4 the for 

i 

the Legislature 

maa nerely prOWlding that ia thl8 ewoptiona inrrtan~, the 

rrddue, even In t&e &tee, of ass8 gas, oauld be btxrnea for 

oarbon-blaok, lrmtead of being retnrned~to the hor%zan CLOSE 

rhioh it 18 preduami, wh$oh wUul& opbi.nrrrily be the ml8 as to 

8weet @8 tuuler t& ~rovirricn8 of &abaeotion l(,ti), Seotion 7, 

~&?tlol* 6608. In other WO&'#8, tie latentlols of the %.4@8htlW
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER (EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13-A-14(A)

I, Robert A. Altieri, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

(1)   I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Carrollton Bancorp;

(2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which the statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15-15(c) for the registrant and have;



(5)   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the registrant's audit committee of the board of directors:



|Date: March 1, 2006 |  |  | /s/ROBERT A. ALTIERIRobert A. Altieri President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

68

---
Exhibit









Exhibit 10.23





Amendment No. 9 to Services Agreement


December 15, 2017


This is Amendment No. 9 to Services Agreement (this “Amendment”) between Sears Holdings Management Corporation (“SHMC”) and Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores, Inc. (“SHO”).  This Amendment amends the Services Agreement between SHMC and SHO dated August 8, 2012, as amended (the “Services Agreement”).  


Terms and Conditions


For and in consideration of the undertakings and commitments in this Amendment the receipt and sufficiency of which SHMC and SHO acknowledge, and intending to be legally bound, SHMC and SHO agree as follows: 




		
	1.
	Amendments.  The following amendments to the Services Agreement are effective as of the date of this Amendment (“Amendment No. 9 Effective Date”).  






		
	A.
	Table II to Attachment A to Appendix 1.01-D eCommerce Services to the Services Agreement, SHO/W2H, is amended and restated as follows:




	
				
	SHO/W2H
	SHO pays SHMC 1% except that SHO pays SHMC 15% if the sale is to a customer who is located in a zip code outside of the Web Territories and who found the offer through eCommerce Marketing, excluding Google’s Local Inventory ads.


SHMC has the right to inspect all eCommerce Marketing and its targeting, at any time, to ensure e-Commerce Marketing is only to customers located in Web Territories.
	Amendment No. 9 Effective Date
	End of eCommerce Services Period








		
	B.
	Table II to Attachment A to Appendix 1.01-D eCommerce Services to the Services Agreement, SHO/S2H, is amended and restated as follows:






	
				
	SHO/S2H
	SHO pays SHMC 1% 
	Amendment No. 9 Effective Date
	End of eCommerce Services Period








		
	2.
	SHMC’s Right to Terminate the Amendments.  SHMC may terminate the Amendments on 30-days’ prior notice to SHO, in which event the Amendments will be void and the language amended and restated by Amendments will again be in effect.




















Exhibit 10.23





		
	3.
	No Other Amendments, Etc. Except as expressly amended herein, the Services Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, in accordance with its terms, without any waiver, amendment or other modification of any provision thereof, including the parties’ choice of Illinois law (pursuant to Section 6.19(a) of the Services Agreement), which also applies to this Amendment. 




	
		
	

Sears Holdings Management Corporation


                                                                                       By: /S/ ROBERT J. PHELAN
Robert J. Phelan
Senior Vice President-Finance and Treasurer




	Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores, Inc.




By: /S/ WILL POWELL
Will Powell
Chief Executive Officer and President
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 45639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81687]


Public Availability of the Securities and Exchange Commission's 
FY 2015 Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, SEC is publishing this notice 
to advise the public of the availability of the FY2016 Service Contract 
Inventory (SCI) and the FY2015 SCI Analysis. The SCI provides 
information on FY2016 actions over $25,000 for service contracts. The 
inventory organizes the information by function to show how SEC 
distributes contracted resources throughout the agency. SEC developed 
the inventory per the guidance issued on November 5, 2011 by the Office 
of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). 
OFPP's guidance is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf.
    The Service Contract Inventory Analysis for FY2015 provides 
information based on the FY 2015 Inventory. Please note that the SEC's 
FY 2016 Service Contract Inventory data is now included in government-
wide inventory available on www.acquisition.gov. The government-wide 
inventory can be filtered to display the inventory data for the SEC. 
The SEC has posted its plan for analyzing FY 2016 data, a link to the 
FY 2016 government-wide Service Contract Inventory and the FY 2015 SCI 
Analysis on the SEC's homepage at http://www.sec.gov/about/secreports.shtml and http://www.sec.gov/open.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding the service 
contract inventory to Vance Cathell, Director Office of Acquisitions 
(202) 551-8385 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91d2f0e5f9f4fdfdc7d1e2f4f2bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d5e7c69757871714b5d6e787e337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 22, 2017.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-20879 Filed 9-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

                                Certification of
                           Chief Executive Officer of
                           Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.

     I, Malcolm M. Aslin, Chief Executive Officer of Gold Banc Corporation,
Inc.,  hereby  certify,  in  accordance  with  18  U.S.C.ss. 1350,  as  adopted
pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  ("Section  906"),
that:

     (a)  The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
          30, 2004, which  accompanies this  certification,  fully complies with
          the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
          Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (b)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
          quarterly  period  ended  June  30,  2004,   which   accompanies  this
          certification,   fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,   the
          financial   condition   and  results  of   operations   of  Gold  Banc
          Corporation, Inc.



Dated:  August 9, 2004

                               By:  /s/ MALCOLM M. ASLIN
                                    ---------------------------------
                                    Malcolm M. Aslin
                                    Chief Executive Officer
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3197 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 21, 2012 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 

in Spokane, Washington, as the ‘‘Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

HR 3197 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 MEDICAL CENTER, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON. 

3 The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 

4 in Spokane, Washington, shall after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Mann6 Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Cen7 ter’’. Any reference to such medical center in any law, reg8 ulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the 

9 United States shall be considered to be a reference to the 

10 Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

11 Center. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 20, 

2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with
### 0 4;1""C'Al . IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 20-0292
MONTANA BOARD OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, Petitioner,
v. MONTANA SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,ROSEBUD COUNTY,HON. KATHERINE M.BIDEGARAY,

Respondent. 

# FILED MAY 29 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Suprerne Court State nf Montana ORDER

Petitioner Montana Board of Environmental Review (BER) seeks a writ of supervisory control directing the Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Rosebud County, to reverse its March 12,2020 Order Denying Respondent Montana Board ofEnvironmental Review's Motion to Dismiss its Cause No.DV 19-34. BER had sought dismissal because it contended it was not a necessary named party in the underlying action. BER further requests a stay ofproceedings in the District Courtpending the outcome ofthis Petition. Having reviewed the Petition and the challenged Order, this Court deems it appropriate to obtain a summary response. Therefore, in accordance with M.R.App.P. 14(7), IT IS ORDERED that the Sixteenth Judicial District Court and Montana Environmental Center and Sierra Club,the Petitioners in the underlying matter,are each granted thirty days from the date ofthis Order,to prepare,file, and serve a response(s)to the petition for writ ofsupervisory control. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the proceedings in the underlying case are STAYED pending this Court's decision on the Petition. 05/29/2020

Case Number: OP 20-0292The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to counsel for

Petitioner, all counsel of record in the Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Rosebud Bow County, Cause No. DV-19-34, and the Honorable Katherine M. Bidegaray, presiding Judge. Dated this bay ofMay,2020.

2 Justice