I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3155 

To preserve the multiple use land management policy in the State of Arizona, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 12, 2011 

Mr. FRANKS of Arizona (for himself, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. QUAYLE, 

Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, 

Mr. CHAFFETZ, and Mrs. LUMMIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To preserve the multiple use land management policy in 

the State of Arizona, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Northern Arizona Min5 ing Continuity Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that— 

8 (1) over the past 20 years, a form of low-im9 pact, safe, and environmentally responsible underVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:00 Oct 13, 2011 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3155.IH H3155

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3155 IH

1 ground ‘‘breccia pipe’’ uranium mining has been 

2 conducted in northern Arizona, particularly in an 

3 area located beyond the northern boundaries of the 

4 Grand Canyon National Park known as the ‘‘Ari5 zona Strip’’; 

6 (2) according to United States Geological Sur7 vey estimates, the Arizona Strip— 

8 (A) has the potential of becoming the sec9 ond most important uranium-producing region 

10 in the United States; and 

11 (B) contains approximately 375,000,000 

12 pounds of high-grade uranium ore with the en13 ergy equivalent of 13,000,000,000 barrels of oil, 

14 which is approximately the quantity of recover15 able oil originally found in Prudhoe Bay, Alas16 ka; 

17 (3) in 1984, during the last uranium boom, 

18 Congress enacted the Arizona Wilderness Act of 

19 1984 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; Public Law 98–406), 

20 which— 

21 (A) is recognized as a historic compromise 

22 between environmental and uranium mining in23 terests; and 

24 (B) affirmed the continued multiple use 

25 management of Federal land on the Arizona 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3155 IH

1 Strip that was not designated as wilderness by 

2 that Act; 

3 (4) continued development of resources on the 

4 Arizona Strip would significantly boost economic 

5 growth in the area, provide for permanent well-pay6 ing jobs, and serve as a source of revenue to the 

7 Federal Government and State and local govern8 ments; 

9 (5) on July 21, 2009, the Department of the 

10 Interior published a notice entitled ‘‘Notice of Pro11 posed Withdrawal and Opportunity for Public Meet12 ing; Arizona’’ (74 Fed. Reg. 35887), which— 

13 (A) proposed the withdrawal of approxi14 mately 1,000,000 acres of Federal locatable 

15 minerals in northern Arizona from the location 

16 of new mining claims over concerns that the 

17 uranium mining could impact the Grand Can18 yon watershed; and 

19 (B) made no mention of the Arizona Wil20 derness Act of 1984 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 

21 Public Law 98–406) or the resource manage22 ment plans that have governed mineral resource 

23 development on the Arizona Strip; and 

24 (6) the February 2011 Draft Environmental 

25 Impact Statement for the proposed withdrawal deVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:00 Oct 13, 2011 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3155.IH H3155

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 3155 IH

1 termined there is no conclusive evidence from well 

2 and spring sampling data that modern-day breccia 

3 pipe uranium mining operations in the northern por4 tion of the Grand Canyon region has impacted the 

5 chemical quality of groundwater in the regional-aqui6 fer. 

7 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF PROPOSED MINING WITHDRAWAL 

8 WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except by express authorization 

10 by Congress referencing this section and notwithstanding 

11 any other provision of law, the Secretary of the Interior 

12 shall not extend, renew, or issue a notice of segregation 

13 or withdrawal of the public land and National Forest Sys14 tem land (including a portion of the land) described in 

15 Public Land Order 7773 (76 Fed. Reg. 37826 (June 28, 

16 2011)). 

17 (b) EFFECT OF NOTICE.—Any notice of segregation 

18 or withdrawal of the land described in subsection (a) shall 

19 have no legal effect. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS