alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<CIK>                                          0001015979
<NAME>                                         HIDENET SECURE ARCHITECHTURES
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     USD

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          66912
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (200)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
#### THE BELLE OF THE COAST. FIGGANS v. AIKEN.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 28, 1895.)

No. 373.

Libel for Personal Injuries—Evidence.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

This was a libel by Baptiste Figgans against the steamboat Belle of the Coast to recover damages sustained by libelant, who was employed on board said boat, by reason of having his fingers crushed between the ends of two barrels while engaged in loading sugar at the landing at Pike’s Peak, on the Mississippi river. The district court dismissed the libel, and the libelant has appealed.

W. W. Handlin, for appellant.

E. EL Farrar, B. F. Jonas, E. B. Kruttsehnitt, and Hewes T. Gurley, for appellee.

Before PARDEE and McCORMICK, Circuit Judges, and BRUCE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Only facts are involved in this case. On the evidence, the district judge found against the libelant, and we find the same way. The decree appealed from is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3004 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3004

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 260 California Drive in Yountville, California, as the ``Private First 
             Class Alejandro R. Ruiz Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS ALEJANDRO R. RUIZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 260 California Drive in Yountville, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Private First Class Alejandro R. Ruiz 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
First Class Alejandro R. Ruiz Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         September 21, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 15, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add First-Class Package Service Contract 81 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2017-203, CP2017-310.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-20063 Filed 9-20-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 12(A)

                   TELEX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
  
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  TEN
                                                 MONTHS
                                                 ENDED                                    YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                               FEBRUARY 2,      ------------------------------------------------------             
                                                  1998            1997           1996            1995           1994  
                                                --------        --------       --------        --------       --------
<S>                                             <C>             <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>     
Income (loss) before income taxes .......       $(19,138)       $ 23,577       $ (4,284)       $  4,133       $  5,217
Interest expense ........................         22,729          12,513         12,517          12,490         10,120
Interest portion of rent expense ........             66             121             88              85             85
                                                --------        --------       --------        --------       --------
Adjusted income before income
         taxes ..........................       $  3,657        $ 36,211       $  8,321        $ 16,708       $ 15,422
                                                ========        ========       ========        ========       ========
                                             
Fixed charges:
         Interest expense ...............       $ 22,729        $ 12,513       $ 12,517        $ 12,490       $ 10,120
         Interest portion of rent expense             66             121             88              85             85
                                                --------        --------       --------        --------       --------
Total fixed charges .....................       $ 22,795        $ 12,634       $ 12,605        $ 12,575       $ 10,205
                                                ========        ========       ========        ========       ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ......            .16            2.87             --(1)         1.33           1.51
                                                ========        ========       ========        ========       ========
</TABLE>

(1)  Earnings for Fiscal 1996 were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $4,284.
     However, excluding the $13,785 special charges set forth in footnote 4 to
     the Consolidated Financial Statements, the ratio of earnings to fixed
     charges for Fiscal 1996 would have been 1.75.
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2 

AN ACT 

To repeal the job-killing health care law and health carerelated provisions in the Health Care and Education 

Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repealing the Job3 Killing Health Care Law Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE JOB-KILLING HEALTH CARE LAW 

5 AND HEALTH CARE-RELATED PROVISIONS IN 

6 THE HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION REC7 ONCILIATION ACT OF 2010. 

8 (a) JOB-KILLING HEALTH CARE LAW.—Effective as 

9 of the enactment of Public Law 111–148, such Act is re10 pealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by 

11 such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not 

12 been enacted. 

13 (b) HEALTH CARE-RELATED PROVISIONS IN THE

14 HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF

15 2010.—Effective as of the enactment of the Health Care 

16 and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 

17 111–152), title I and subtitle B of title II of such Act 

18 are repealed, and the provisions of law amended or re19 pealed by such title or subtitle, respectively, are restored 

20 or revived as if such title and subtitle had not been en21 acted. 

22 SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT. 

23 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

24 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

25 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

26 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 
3 

•HR 2 EH

1 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

2 by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the 

3 House of Representatives, as long as such statement has 

4 been submitted prior to the vote on passage of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 19, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2 

AN ACT 

To repeal the job-killing health care law and health 

Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. care-related provisions in the Health Care and
CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY

#### Dorothy Goodwin v. Arlington Hospital Assn. et al.

May 6, 1985

Case No. (Law) 24475

By JUDGE THOMAS R. MONROE

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories propounded to Defendants, Drs. Neefe and Nirschl, is presented for determination by the Court. I have carefully considered the able arguments of counsel and authorities submitted by them.

It is my opinion that Plaintiff is entitled to answers to the standard of medical care interrogatories within the ambit of Rule 4:1 of the Supreme Court of Virginia. I can find no valid Fifth Amendment nor attorney-client privileges to be asserted. Defendants cannot invoke any privilege against being called as a witness in a civil suit.
EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 Three Months Ended
    
    
    Nine Months EndedDecember 31,
    
    
    December 31,2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2010
    
    
    2009*Earnings per common share  basicNet (loss) income
    
    $
    (8,188
    )
    
    $
    788
    
    
    $
    (34,041
    )
    
    $
    1,169Less: CPP Preferred Dividends
    
    
    82
    
    
    
    237
    
    
    
    588
    
    
    
    712Dividends paid and undistributed (losses)/earnings
allocated to participating securities
    
    
    (59
    )
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    (248
    )
    
    
    8Net Income Available to Common Shareholders
    
    $
    (8,210
    )
    
    $
    547
    
    
    $
    (34,381
    )
    
    $
    449Weighted average common shares
outstanding
    
    
    2,484,285
    
    
    
    2,474,719
    
    
    
    2,483,350
    
    
    
    2,473,164Earnings per common share
    
    $
    (3.30
    )
    
    $
    0.22
    
    
    $
    (13.84
    )
    
    $
    0.18Earnings per common share  dilutedNet income
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    788
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    1,174Less: CPP Preferred Dividends
    
    
    
    
    
    
    237
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    712Dividends paid and undistributed earnings
allocated to participating securities
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    8Net Income Available to Common Shareholders
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    547
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    454Weighted average common shares
outstanding  basic
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,474,719
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,473,164Effect of dilutive securities  stock options and
unvested restricted stock
    
    
    
    
    
    
    18,223
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    18,223Weighted average shares
outstanding  diluted
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,492,942
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,491,387Earnings per common share
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    0.22
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    0.18
 *
    
    Restated as previously disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 15, 2010
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CORAZON LABAO FERRER, AN HEIR

& ASSIGNEE OF ARTURO LABAO

 Appellant,

v.

NOEMI GUEVARA,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-04-00200-CV

Appeal from the

215th District Court

of Harris County, Texas

(TC# 2002-63463) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REMAND

Pending before the Court is a agreed upon motion requesting this Court to render

judgment effectuating the parties’ settlement agreement. By their motion, the parties have

reached a settlement agreement resolving all disputes between them, including the matters at

issue in this appeal.

Rule 42.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure authorizes an appellate court to

dispose of an appeal pursuant to an agreement of the parties. TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(2). The

Court may render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement, set aside (vacate) the trial court’s

judgment and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the

agreement, or abate the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the

agreement. TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(2).

The parties have agreed that this Court should render judgment effectuating the parties’

agreement. Accordingly, the joint motion to dispose of the appeal in accordance with the parties’
-2-

agreement is granted. We render judgment that the medical expenses award be subject to a

$1,088,842.89 remittitur resulting in a medical expenses award of $20,326.53. Appellant is

awarded $125,000 for pain and mental anguish. Appellant will receive $29,673.47 for agreed

interest and court costs. Our mandate will issue ten days from the date of this opinion and

judgment.

August 14, 2008

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.
1

Opinion issued November 18, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00646-CV

———————————

TAMBRIA LEE, Appellant

V.

DANIEL LEON PETERSON AND MORGAN PETERSON, JR., Appellees

On Appeal from the 239th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 53927

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Tambria Lee, has neither paid the required fees nor established 

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.

GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding 

Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and 
2

Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 

(Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). Further, 

appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the 

clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal 

was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P.

5; 42.3(b).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of 

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21


                          PERSEPTIVE BIOSYSTEMS, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



                                                         State of Jurisdiction
   Name                                                     of Incorporation
   ----                                                     ----------------

   PerSeptive Technologies II Corporation..................    Delaware

   PerSeptive International Holdings, Ltd. ................    Delaware

   Nihon PerSeptive K.K. ..................................    Japan

   PerSeptive Biosystems (Canada) Ltd. .....................   Canada

   PerSeptive Biosystems GmbH..............................    Germany

   PerSeptive Biosystems (U.K.) Ltd., a subsidiary of
         PerSeptive International Holdings, Ltd. ..........    England


   PerSeptive Biosystems (France) Ltd., a subsidiary of
         PerSeptive International Holdings, Ltd. ..........    Delaware


   PerSeptive Biosystems GmbH-Hamburg, a subsidiary of
         PerSeptive Biosystems GmbH........................    Germany
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3384-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-3384-EM), dated September 5, 2017, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued September 18, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective September 7, 2017.

                        The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially                               ( print page 44641)                            Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.                    

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-20455 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IMARK
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 10-QSB FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          58,972
<SECURITIES>                                    20,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               143,753
<PP&E>                                         702,426
<DEPRECIATION>                               (186,836)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 842,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          304,421
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,195
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   842,364
<SALES>                                         20,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  861,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 654
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (833,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (833,802)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (833,802)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        


</TABLE>