alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3247 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3247

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
1100 Town and Country Commons in Chesterfield, Missouri, as the ``Lance 
          Corporal Matthew P. Pathenos Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL MATTHEW P. PATHENOS POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1100 Town and Country Commons in Chesterfield, Missouri, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Matthew P. 
Pathenos Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Matthew P. Pathenos Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CARROLLTON
BANCORP'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000859222
<NAME> CARROLLTON BANCORP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      24,795,534
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,840,365
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 75,747,478
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          50,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            50,000
<LOANS>                                    257,447,335
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,836,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             375,619,201
<DEPOSITS>                                 262,449,865
<SHORT-TERM>                                81,481,032
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,803,727
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,776,904
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,107,673
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             375,619,201
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             17,909,278
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,060,935
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               285,683
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            22,255,896
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           7,984,401
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,953,649
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       11,302,247
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  597,840
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             239,669
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             17,864,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,751,296
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,751,296
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,751,296
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.01
<LOANS-NON>                                    240,569
<LOANS-PAST>                                   837,198
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               330,987
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                693,992
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,387,732
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  302,825
<RECOVERIES>                                   153,544
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,836,291
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,836,291
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,138,416


</TABLE>
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY

#### Brenner v. Fox et al.

May 30, 1995

Case No. (Chancery) 138456

By Judge Michael P. McWeeny

This case came before the Court on May 26, 1995, upon Brenner's “Motion to Overrule Demurrer.” After review, the Court grants the motion in part and denies it in part.

Complainant correctly sets forth the state of the law in the Commonwealth: “[I]t is competent for the court having possessed itself of the subject by proper exercise of its [equity] jurisdiction, to do complete justice between the parties; and as ancillary to that purpose, may ascertain damages sustained by the defendant....” *Nagle*v. Newton, 63 Va. (22 Gratt.) 814, 825 (1872). The key language is “ancillary to that purpose.”

Count 1 of the Bill of Complaint is a Stockholder Derivative Action requesting an accounting and change of management of the corporation and, as such, is properly in equity. In order to be given complete relief, Brenner also requests his back pay and reimbursement of expenses incurred on behalf of the corporation, which relief is ancillary to the request for accounting. (The issue of punitive damages is not addressed by the Demurrer.)

Counts 2 through 7, however, allege and request damages as the result of the actions of the defendants. None of these counts support the requested “equitable” relief they contain. Nor are the claims ancillary to the equity claim of Count 1 or necessary to give complete relief thereunder. The fact that a Complainant may obtain equity jurisdiction over a Defendant does not create a right to attach any relief at law he may have against the same party. Even though the same facts may be the basis of different *397causes of actions, they are not necessarily “ancillary” (“auxiliary or subordinate” according to *Black’s Law Dictionary)*to the equity claim.

The Motion to Overrule the Demurrer is granted as to Count 1, but denied as to Counts 2 through 7. This has the effect of sustaining the Demurrer on the latter counts, and the Court grants twenty-one days from entry of the Decree to sever the counts, transfer them to the law side of the court, and file a Motion for Judgment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-110-2017]

On July 20, 2017, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the City of San Jose, grantee of FTZ 18, requesting an expansion of Subzone 18F, subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 18, on behalf of Lam Research Corporation, in Fremont and Livermore, California.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (82 FR 34475-3476, July 25, 2017). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to expand Subzone 18F was approved on September 14, 2017, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 143's 2,000-acre activation limit.                

Dated: September 22, 2017.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-20807 Filed 9-27-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6498

BRANDON MICHAEL CRAWFORD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

EDDIE L. PEARSON, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:13-cv-00773-TSE-JFA)

Submitted: June 6, 2016 Decided: June 16, 2016

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Anthony Petrino, KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP, Washington, 

D.C., for Appellant. Craig Stallard, Assistant Attorney 

General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Michael Crawford seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) 

petition seeking to challenge his Virginia sentence of mandatory 

life without parole under Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 

(2012).* The district court concluded that Miller was not 

retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review for 

purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(C) (2012). Subsequent to the 

district court’s decision, the Supreme Court held in Montgomery 

v. Louisiana, 136 S. Ct. 718, 732 (2016), that “Miller announced 

a new substantive rule that is retroactive in cases on 

collateral review.” Because the district court did not have the 

benefit of this decision, we grant a certificate of 

appealability, vacate the judgment, and remand for further 

proceedings in light of Montgomery. We express no opinion as to 

the merits of Crawford’s petition. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

 * Crawford received this mandatory life sentence for two 

counts of capital murder; he was 17 at the time he committed the 

offenses.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3004 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3004

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2011

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 260 California Drive in Yountville, California, as the ``Private 
         First Class Alejandro R. Ruiz Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS ALEJANDRO R. RUIZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 260 California Drive in Yountville, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Private First Class Alejandro R. Ruiz 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
First Class Alejandro R. Ruiz Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 16, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6543

LENNOX ALLEYNE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER D. MCLEOD; SERGEANT G. W. ODOM;

OFFICER I. BRIGMAN, in their individual and

official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-96-219-4-20BE)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 24, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lennox Alleyne, Appellant Pro Se. L. Hunter Limbaugh, WILLCOX,

MCLEOD, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Alleyne v. McLeod, No. CA96-219-4-20BE (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15310 and #15311; WISCONSIN Disaster Number WI-00061]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Wisconsin dated 09/18/2017. *Incident:*
                         Heavy Rains and Flash Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/19/2017 through 07/23/2017.
 DATES: Issued on 09/18/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/17/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/18/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.  Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     La Crosse, Trempealeau *Contiguous Counties:* Wisconsin: Buffalo, Eau Claire, Jackson, Monroe, Vernon Minnesota: Houston, Winona The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.500Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.750Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.610Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*( print page 45110)Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 153106 and for economic injury is 153110. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Wisconsin, Minnesota. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Dated: September 18, 2017. Linda E. McMahon, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2017-20704 Filed 9-26-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 23, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-51226

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANCISCO GARCIA-SALAZAR,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-02-CR-1171-ALL-PR

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Francisco Garcia-Salazar appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

He contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the

two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a). Garcia-Salazar complains that his sentence was

improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). He argues

that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. 
No. 02-51226

-2-

Alternatively, Garcia-Salazar contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)

and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that

the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was

an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that

should have been alleged in his indictment.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Garcia-Salazar acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 308 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2947 

[Report No. 112–441] 

To provide for the release of the reversionary interest held by the United 

States in certain land conveyed by the United States in 1950 for the 

establishment of an airport in Cook County, Minnesota. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2011 

Mr. CRAVAACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

APRIL 16, 2012 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2947 RH

A BILL 

To provide for the release of the reversionary interest held 

by the United States in certain land conveyed by the 

United States in 1950 for the establishment of an airport 

in Cook County, Minnesota. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2947 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST AND 

4 USE CONDITIONS, COOK COUNTY AIRPORT, 

5 COOK COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 

6 (a) RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST RE7 QUIRED.—The Secretary of Agriculture, acting on behalf 

8 of the United States, shall release, without consider9 ation— 

10 (1) the conditions imposed on the use of the 

11 parcel of land originally conveyed by the Secretary 

12 pursuant to section 16 of the Federal Airport Act 

13 (Act of May 13, 1946, ch. 251, 60 Stat. 170) to the 

14 State of Minnesota by deed executed May 31, 1950, 

15 for the establishment of an airport in Cook County, 

16 Minnesota; and 

17 (2) the reversionary interest retained by the 

18 United States in connection with such conditions. 

19 (b) INSTRUMENT OF RELEASE.—The Secretary of 

20 Agriculture shall execute and file in the appropriate office 

21 a deed of release, amended deed, or other appropriate in22 strument reflecting the release of the reversionary interest 

23 and conditions under subsection (a). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 308 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2947 

[Report No. 112–441] 

A BILL 

To provide for the release of the reversionary internesota. lishment of an airport in Cook County, Min- veyed by the United States in 1950 for the estab- est held by the United States in certain land conAPRIL 16, 2012 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS