alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45611-45612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Automotive Cybersecurity Industry Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 23, 2017, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Automotive Cybersecurity 
Industry Consortium (``ACIC'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Mazda Motor of America, Inc., Irvine, CA; 
American Honda Co., Inc., Torrance, CA; and Toyota Motor North America, 
Inc., Saline, MI, have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ACIC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On January 11, 2017, ACIC filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section

[[Page 45612]]

6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the 
Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 27, 
2017 (82 FR 11942).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-20880 Filed 9-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 11.1

CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004



|BEGINNING BALANCE |                      | 17,883,015                      
|----------------- | -------------------- | --------------------------------
|DATE              | NO. OF SHARES
ISSUED | CONTRIBUTION TO
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
|                 
|                  |                      |                                 
|February 6, 2004  | 12,000               |                                 
|February 13, 2004 | 15,000               |                                 
|March 30, 2004    | 10,000               |                                 
|March 31, 2004    | 10,000               |                                 
|April 15, 2004    | 521,588              |                                 
|May 27, 2004      | 113,000              |                                 
|June 28, 2004     | 10,000               |                                 



|Loss for the period     | $1,402,000
|----------------------- | ----------
|Weighted average shares | 18,153,822
|Net Loss per share      | $(0.08)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40945 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RODOLFO CARRANZA-VELASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-161-1

-------------------- December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rodolfo Carranza-Velasquez appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for being present in the United States after having previously been deported or removed following an aggravated-felony conviction. Carranza-Velasquez argues for the first time on appeal that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is unconstitutional because it permitted the sentencing judge to find, under a preponderance of the evidence standard, a factNo. 01-40945 -2- which increased the statutory maximum sentence to which he otherwise would have been exposed. He thus contends that hissentence is invalid and argues that it should not exceed the twoyear maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Carranza-Velasquez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
H. R. 3246 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 15455 

Manchester Road in Ballwin, Missouri, as the ‘‘Specialist Peter J. Navarro Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST PETER J. NAVARRO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 15455 Manchester Road in Ballwin, Missouri, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Specialist Peter J. Navarro 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Specialist Peter J. Navarro Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6272** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. BRUCE LEE JOHNSON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. C. Weston Houck , Senior District Judge. ( 4:02

- cr - 00579

- CWH

- 2 )

Submitted : April 22, 2010 Decided: April 28, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Bruce Lee Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William E. Day, II, Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorneys, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Bruc e Lee Johnson appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) to set aside his conviction on the ground that the criminal judgment against him is void . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordi ngly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson , No. 4:02

- cr - 00579

- CWH

- 2 (D.S.C. Feb. 1, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET - UNAUDITED AND CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF
INCOME  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>        0000859360
<NAME>       LEGATO SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                                      30,019
<SECURITIES>                                                20,199
<RECEIVABLES>                                                6,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  (667)
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            48,134
<PP&E>                                                       3,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (2,117)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              60,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        9,044
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         3
<OTHER-SE>                                                  51,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                60,390
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            32,531
<CGS>                                                        4,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               24,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              8,762
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 2,729
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 6,033
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.20
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Braintech, Inc. (the "Company ") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Owen L.J. Jones the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Owen Jones			Owen L.J. Jones
Principal Executive Officer



My 12, 2004
(210) 

APPENDIX NO. 5 

OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT 

The Vice Presidency is a unique office that is neither a part of the executive branch nor a part 

of the legislative branch, but is attached by the Constitution to the latter. The Vice Presidency performs 

functions in both the legislative branch (see article I, section 3 of the Constitution) and in the executive 

branch (see article II, and amendments XII and XXV, of the Constitution, and section 106 of title 

3 of the United States Code). 

The annual legislative branch appropriations act (see, for example, Public Law 109–55) and the 

annual transportation-treasury appropriations act (see, for example, Public Law 109–115) provide funds 

for the Vice President to hire employees to assist him in carrying out his legislative and executive 

functions. Executive branch employees also may be assigned or detailed to the Vice President (see 

3 U.S.C. 112) and the Vice President may employ consultants (see 3 U.S.C. 106(a)). The Office of 

the Vice President (OVP) consists of the aggregation of Vice Presidential employees whose salary is 

disbursed by the Secretary of the Senate from the Vice President’s legislative appropriation, Vice Presidential employees employed with the Vice President’s executive appropriation, employees assigned or 

detailed to the Vice President, and consultants engaged by the Vice President. 

The numbers, titles and salaries of OVP personnel change with some frequency. The salaries 

of Vice Presidential employees whose salary is disbursed by the Secretary of the Senate from the 

Vice President’s legislative appropriation cannot exceed a maximum specified by law (see 2 U.S.C. 

60a–1). The salaries of Vice Presidential employees whose salary comes from the Vice President’s 

executive appropriation also cannot exceed a maximum specified by law (see 3 U.S.C. 106). The authority 

to appoint, administratively determine the pay of, and discharge Vice Presidential employees rests 

with the Vice President. 

The current duty station of all OVP positions is Washington, DC. 

Æ 

rmajette


on PRODPC74 with MISCELLANEOUS
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.1

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                             --------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              1996          1997          1998          1999          2000
                                                             --------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     (in thousands)
<S>                                                          <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
EARNINGS
        Income From Continuing Operations *                  59,246        61,925        53,885        72,856        65,951
        Fixed Charges                                        36,485        35,458        30,915        34,305        55,621
        Capitalized Interest                                 (1,388)       (1,478)         (795)       (2,133)       (4,559)
                                                             --------------------------------------------------------------
            Total Earnings                                   94,343        95,905        84,005       105,028       117,013
                                                             ==============================================================

FIXED CHARGES
        Interest Expense                                     34,922        33,707        29,784        31,563        48,982
        Capitalized Interest                                  1,388         1,478           795         2,133         4,559
        Rental Interest Factor                                  175           273           336           609         2,080
                                                             --------------------------------------------------------------
            Total Fixed Charges                              36,485        35,458        30,915        34,305        55,621
                                                             ==============================================================


RATIO: EARNINGS / FIXED CHARGES                                2.59          2.70          2.72          3.06          2.10
                                                             ==============================================================
</TABLE>



* Excludes minority interest, extraordinary loss and undistributed
  equity earnings.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the September 30, 2002 Form 10-Q of Cornell Companies, Inc. (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry J. Phillips, Jr., certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/HARRY J. PHILLIPS, JRHarry J. Phillips, Jr., Executive Chairman,
Chairman of the Board and Director
November 14, 2002
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No.**  **DA 23 -**  **0 483**  HAZEL NOONAN,

Appellant, vs. JOHN MICHAEL CONNORS .

Appellee. **ORDER**
Upon receipt of Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief

– First Request, and good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that the Motion is GRANTED. Appellant shall file her Reply brief on or before March 27 , 202 4 . No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 27 2024

02/27/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0483
NOTE FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT







This amendment, dated _______, to various Convertible Promissory Notes, the April Senior Note originally dated April 20, 2016, the $53,197 May Senior Note originally dated May 17, 2016, and the November Senior Note originally dated November 1, 2016 (the "Notes"), by and among Zenosense, Inc., as the borrower ("Borrower"), and _______, as the holder ("Holder"), is being entered into as a forbearance arrangement to allow greater time during which the Holder may pay the amounts due under the Notes.  The current maturity date of the April Senior Note is April 19, 2018, and the current maturity date of the $53,197 May Senior Note and the November Senior Note is May 16, 2018, however, the Borrower does not currently have the financial resources to repay the Notes in part or in whole, together with the other financial obligations thereunder. This amendment to the Notes is the agreement of the Holder that it will not demand or expect repayment of any or all of the sums due under the Notes from the date hereof through a period ending April 11, 2019 ("Forbearance Period").  Further, as a point of clarification, all of the provisions of the Notes regarding the rights of the Holder and Borrower will endure during the Forbearance Period as if each day of the Forbearance Period were the Note's Maturity Date, including the Holder's right to convert during the Forbearance Period, the Holder and Borrow agreeing that conversion, in line with the provisions contained in Article 1 of the Notes, may take place on any day during the Forbearance Period.  During the Forbearance Period, the Notes will not be deemed in default because of non-payment of the financial obligations under the Notes. During the Forbearance Period, the Holder also will not take any action to declare the Notes in default for the Borrower's failure to pay the Notes at maturity or otherwise not satisfying its financial obligations under the Notes, or commence or participate in any proceeding to obtain payment of the financial obligations of the Notes premised on a declaration of default of those payment obligations.







Agreed and accepted as of this 12 day of April, 2018












Zenosense, Inc.












_________________


By: Carlos Gil


Position: Chief Executive Officer







 







___________________


By:


Position: Authorized Signatory
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          17,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     45,378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               342,452
<PP&E>                                       3,280,739
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,304,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,318,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,446,047
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,373,000
<COMMON>                                       199,933
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,700,317)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,318,663
<SALES>                                        645,895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               645,895
<CGS>                                          681,920
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  793,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               600,601
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             306,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,429,934)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,429,934)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,429,934)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>