alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of Company Share Option Plan Option Certificate under 2011-13 LTIP and JSOP



 Exhibit 10.43 
 VIRGIN MEDIA INC. COMPANY SHARE OPTION PLAN 
 FORM OF APPROVED OPTION
CERTIFICATE 
 Virgin Media Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT [NAME] of [ADDRESS] is the holder of an Option granted under Schedule A to the Plan (the “Schedule”) on
January 28, 2011 (the “Date of Grant”) to acquire [NUMBER] Ordinary Shares in the capital of Virgin Media, Inc. at an Exercise Price of $[PRICE]* for each Ordinary Share. 

The Option must be exercised in accordance with the Schedule and it is personal to the employee whose name appears above. Unless specifically provided in
the Schedule the Option cannot be transferred, assigned, mortgaged, charged or otherwise disposed of. 
 If there is to be no charge to income
tax and National Insurance contributions on the exercise of the Option then, in addition to complying with the Schedule, the exercise must take place:- 
  

	 	•	 	 between the third and tenth anniversary of the Date of Grant (or earlier in certain ‘good leaver’ circumstances); and



  

	 	•	 	 at a time when the Schedule retains HMRC approval. 


 The Directors confirm that any power to veto the transfer of shares will not be used in any way to discriminate against the transfer of shares acquired pursuant to the terms of the Schedule. The shares
acquired pursuant to the terms of the Schedule will not carry restrictions and will be freely tradable in the ordinary course. 
 The Option may
be exercised by delivery to the Company of a written notice signed by the person entitled to exercise the Option, specifying the number of shares which such person wishes to purchase, together with a certified bank cheque or cash (or such other
manner of payment as permitted by the Plan) for the aggregate option price for that number of shares and any required withholding (including a payment sufficient to indemnify the Company or any subsidiary of the Company in full against any and all
liability to account for any tax, employee’s National Insurance contributions, or duty payable and arising by reason of the exercise of the Option). 

 

			
	VIRGIN MEDIA INC.
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	Neil Berkett
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer


 THIS
CERTIFICATE IS IMPORTANT AND SHOULD BE KEPT IN A SAFE PLACE 
  

	*	NOTE: - The Exercise Price and the number of Shares comprised in this Option may be varied in accordance with Part I of the Schedule. Notice of any such variation will
be sent to Option Holders. - The terms and expressions used in this document shall have the meanings given to them in Part I of the Schedule. Where this document differs from Part I of the Schedule, the Schedule will take precedence.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a closed meeting on Thursday, 
September 28, 2017 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(7), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit 
consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Stein, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Adjudicatory matters; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed; please contact Brent J. Fields from 
the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: September 21, 2017.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-20633 Filed 9-22-17; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Ex.99 Press release re sale of Softkat,Inc
                eSynch Corp.

              TUSTIN, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 9,
              1999--eSynch Corp. (OTC BB:ESYN - news)
              Wednesday announced completion of the
              sale of Softkat Inc., and its wholly
              owned subsidiary, Sonoma Multimedia, to
              Kilburn Consultants Ltd.
              Under the terms of the Agreement, eSynch
              sold its interest in Softkat. The
              transaction is consistent with eSynch's
              strategy to further strengthen its focus
              on electronic software distribution and
              e-commerce.

              Softkat publishes, distributes, and
              sells software to national retailers
              such as CompUSA, and Future Shop, as
              well as a number of regional retailers
              and international exporters. Sonoma
              Multimedia licenses and publishes dozens
              of software titles, which are
              distributed through Softkat.

              The Softkat and Sonoma business model
              could not be economically converted to
              one that emphasizes electronic
              distribution over traditional physical
              goods distribution. eSynch's ESD
              (Electronic Software Distribution)
              technology and its related Internet
              growth plans, point to expansion and
              growth of the e-commerce-based ESD
              businesses. Softkat and Sonoma just
              could not be adjusted to fit in with
              this overall strategy.

              Statements herein express management's
              beliefs and expectations regarding
              future performance and are
              forward-looking and involve risks and
              uncertainties, including, but not
              limited to, the ability to negotiate
              outstanding prior debts of acquired
              companies; properly identify acquisition
              partners; adequately perform due
              diligence; manage and integrate acquired
              businesses; react to quarterly
              fluctuations in results; raise working
              capital and secure other financing;
              respond to competition and rapidly
              changing technology; deal with market
              and stock price fluctuations; and other
              risks. These risks are and will be
              detailed, from time to time, in eSynch's
              Securities and Exchange Commission
              filings, including Form 10-KSB for the
              year ended Dec. 31, 1997 and subsequent
              Forms 10-QSB and 8-K. Actual results may
              differ materially from management's
              expectations.
CIRCUIT COURT OF BEDFORD COUNTY

#### Commonwealth of Virginia v. Odie Owen Ruff Commonwealth of Virginia v. Glenn Wilton Ruff

January 12, 1973

By JUDGE WILLIAM W. SWEENEY

I have reviewed your authorities in the two captioned cases tried by a jury in Bedford on December 12, 1972. After a study of the authorities and a review of the evidence, it is my opinion that the jury verdicts should be sustained in both cases and on both counts. Briefly stated, my reasons are as follows:

1. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the Commonwealth, I believe that the Commonwealth presented sufficient evidence, expert and otherwise, to justify the jury’s conclusion that the defendants, and each of them, had in their actual or constructive possession a firearm within one hundred yards of the still where alcoholic beverages were being unlawfully manufactured in violation of Section 4-83, Code of Virginia.

2. I do not think it was the intent of the Legislature that Subsection (d) of Section 4-57 stating that "the presence of mash at an unlicensed distillery *425shall constitute manufacture" should apply only to that particular section and not to other sections within Title 4 where manufacturing is required. The expression "Manufacture ... as herein defined" in Section 4-83 should be read in conjunction with Section 4-57(d).

3. It would be illogical to interpret Section 4-83 in such a way that a defendant could be found guilty of manufacturing alcoholic beverages but not guilty of keeping a firearm there because the manufacturing had not been proven. The purpose of Section 4-83 was to prevent people being shot by operators of the still. Whether alcohol was actually running out the pipe of the still at the time should make no difference. A full review of the evidence in this case clearly shows that the defendants were doing more than just "camping out" by the still when they were apprehended. The loaded gun near the still was a danger to the officers who had good reason to fear the defendants.

4. The defendants elected to be tried together and on both charges; manufacturing and possession of a firearm. The jury has found them both guilty of manufacturing and I have entered judgment on the verdicts. To now hold that they were "manufacturing for one purpose and not "manufacturing" for another would seem highly artificial and illogical.

5. The cases cited by the defendants are distinguishable on their facts.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BOYKIN LODGING COMPANY AS OF MARCH 31,
2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001015859
<NAME> BOYKIN LODGING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,958
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         649,490
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 605,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        299,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     268,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   605,009
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,487
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (55)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,657
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,657
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,657
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT UTILIZES AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET THEREFORE TOTAL CURRENT
ASSETS AND TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES ARE NOT APPLICABLE.
</FN>


</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MELVIN PATRICK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1371

[October 8, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Edward H. Merrigan, 

Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 16-8733-CF-10A.

Melvin Patrick, Clermont, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BOYKIN LODGING COMPANY AS OF JUNE 30, 1997,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         301,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,633,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                     153,455,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             160,162,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     20,000,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 116,197,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               160,162,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,167,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,730,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,072,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             611,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,754,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,754,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,754,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81
<FN>
<F1>THE REGISTRANT USES AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET. THEREFORE, TOTAL CURRENT
ASSETS AND TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES ARE NOT APPLICABLE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 14, 2014

Order 

Clerk

November 14, 2014

150398 (28)

ROBERT L. DYKES-BEY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 150398

COA: 321982

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $18.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$357.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2713 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2713

 To limit investor and homeowner losses in foreclosures, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2011

  Mr. Cohen (for himself and Mr. McDermott) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit investor and homeowner losses in foreclosures, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Limiting Investor and Homeowner Loss 
in Foreclosure Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. LOSS MITIGATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 105 of title 11, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Without limiting the court's authority under subsection (d) 
or under any other statute or rule, the court, by local rule or order, 
may establish and maintain a loss mitigation program for the 
consideration and negotiation of consensual alternatives to avoid 
foreclosure between an individual debtor and the holder of a claim 
secured by a security interest in real property that is the debtor's 
principal residence.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 362(e) of title 11, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(3) If the party in interest requesting relief from the stay 
under subsection (d) of this section participates in a loss mitigation 
program maintained pursuant to section 105(e) of this title, the time 
periods specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection shall be 
tolled during the time period commencing on the date on which such 
participation began and ending on the date on which notice of such 
termination is filed and served on the debtor.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3219 

To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 with respect to small 

business investment companies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 14, 2011 

Mr. CHABOT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 with 

respect to small business investment companies, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Invest5 ment Company Modernization Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MAXIMUM LEVERAGE. 

7 Section 303(b)(2) of the Small Business Investment 

8 Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. (b)(2)) is amended by striking 

9 so much of paragraph (2) as precedes subparagraph (C) 

10 and inserting the following: 


PWALKER on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3219 IH

1 ‘‘(2) MAXIMUM LEVERAGE.— 

2 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 

3 subparagraph (B), the maximum amount of 

4 outstanding leverage made available to any one 

5 company licensed under section 301(c) of this 

6 Act may not exceed the lesser of— 

7 ‘‘(i) 300 percent of such company’s 

8 private capital; or 

9 ‘‘(ii) $150,000,000. 

10 ‘‘(B) CERTAIN SINGLE COMPANIES.—Be11 ginning after the date of enactment of this sub12 paragraph, if a majority of the managers of a 

13 company are experienced in managing one or 

14 more companies licensed under section 301(c) 

15 of this Act (as determined by the Adminis16 trator), the maximum amount of outstanding 

17 leverage made available to that company may 

18 not exceed the lesser of— 

19 ‘‘(i) 300 percent of such company’s 

20 private capital; or 

21 ‘‘(ii) $200,000,000. 

22 ‘‘(C) MULTIPLE LICENSEES UNDER COM23 MON CONTROL.—The maximum amount of out 

24 standing leverage made available to two or more 

25 companies licensed under section 301(c) of this 


PWALKER on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3219 IH

1 Act that are commonly controlled (as deter2 mined by the Administrator) and not under 

3 capital impairment may not exceed 

4 $350,000,000, but the material capital impair5 ment of one licensed company in a group under 

6 common control shall not reduce the maximum 

7 amounts of outstanding leverage that is made 

8 available to the other licensed companies in that 

9 group under common control.’’. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24g



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, a director of
WHOLESOME & HEARTY FOODS, INC., an Oregon corporation (the "Company"), hereby
constitutes and appoints RICHARD C. DIETZ his true and lawful attorney-in-fact
and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in
his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Form 10-K
Annual Report, with all exhibits and amendments thereto, of Wholesome & Hearty
Foods, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and to file this Power
of Attorney and the Form 10-K, and all exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., granting unto said attorney-in-fact and
agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each of said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute
or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


                                   Dated this 3rd day of December, 1996.

                                   /s/PAUL F. WENNER  , Director
                                   -------------------
                                   Paul F. Wenner