alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 290 

AN ACT 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to ensure that memorials commemorating the service of the United States 

Armed Forces may contain religious symbols, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 290 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘War Memorial Protec3 tion Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS AS PART OF 

5 MILITARY MEMORIALS. 

6 (a) AUTHORITY.—Chapter 21 of title 36, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘§ 2115. Inclusion of religious symbols as part of mili10 tary memorials 

11 ‘‘(a) INCLUSION OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS AUTHOR12 IZED.—To recognize the religious background of members 

13 of the United States Armed Forces, religious symbols may 

14 be included as part of— 

15 ‘‘(1) a military memorial that is established or 

16 acquired by the United States Government; or 

17 ‘‘(2) a military memorial that is not established 

18 by the United States Government, but for which the 

19 American Battle Monuments Commission cooperated 

20 in the establishment of the memorial. 

21 ‘‘(b) MILITARY MEMORIAL DEFINED.—In this sec22 tion, the term ‘military memorial’ means a memorial or 

23 monument commemorating the service of the United 

24 States Armed Forces. The term includes works of archi25 tecture and art described in section 2105(b) of this title.’’. 
3 

•HR 290 EH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

3 at the end the following: 

‘‘2115. Inclusion of religious symbols as part of military memorials.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 24, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 290 

AN ACT 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to ensure 

gious symbols, and for other purposes. United States Armed Forces may contain relithat memorials commemorating the service of the
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40094

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALVIRO PANTALEON-DAMIAN, also known as Albiro Damian-Pantaleon,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:15-CR-493-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alviro PantaleonDamian has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pantaleon-Damian has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 18, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40094 Document: 00513722097 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
No. 16-40094

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40094 Document: 00513722097 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
```

[United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions (Plum Book), 1996]
[Independent Agencies and Government Corporations]
[Smithsonian Institution]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

The Plum Book (United States Government Policy
        and Supporting Positions): 1996 EditionBRANCH: EXECUTIVE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONLocationPosition TitleName of IncumbentPay PlanType of Appt.Level Grade or PayTenureExpiresCambridge, MADirector, Smithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryIrwin I. ShapiroEXXSV..................Ancon, Panama
            Director, Smithsonian Tropical Research InstituteIra RubinoffOTXS............................Washington, DCDirector, National Portrait GalleryAlan M. FernOTXS............................Washington, DCDeputy Director, Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden VacantOTXS............................Washington, DCDirector of Public Programs/Chief CuratorNeal D. BenezraOTXS............................Washington, DCDirector, National Museum of African Art VacantOTXS............................
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      11,994,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,616,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                91,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 49,071,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      19,696,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        19,373,000
<LOANS>                                    190,724,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,996,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             295,684,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 234,125,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                18,564,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,867,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 16,803,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,302,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             295,684,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             15,817,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,707,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               539,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            20,063,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           9,049,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,706,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        9,357,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  464,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              69,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             10,098,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,601,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,601,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,107,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.64
<LOANS-NON>                                    565,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   529,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,964,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,915,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  408,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    49,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,996,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,996,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,996,000


</TABLE>
Order filed January 14, 2021. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00783-CV

____________

DEBRA GILDER, INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE 

OF JOHNNY ALLEN GILDER, SR., Appellant

V.

CECIL BOYKIN, HENRY CHAVEZ, CHRISTINA CHAVEZ, ANDRES 

ALVARADO, DIANA FRANCISCO, Appellees

On Appeal from the 506th Judicial District Court

Waller County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 18-10-25206

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due January 8, 2021. No brief or motion for extension 

of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before February 8, 2021, 

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,660
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,741
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (147)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,797
<PP&E>                                           4,474
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,040)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,348
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           194
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,144
<SALES>                                         37,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,970
<CGS>                                           32,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,151)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,569)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (1,582)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,151)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.38)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report on Form
10-QSB of netGuru, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2002 (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: December 2, 2002                       By:  /s/ Amrit K. Das
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                       Amrit K. Das
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

         In connection with amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report on Form
10-QSB of netGuru, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2002 (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: December 2, 2002                         By:/s/ Bruce K. Nelson
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                       Bruce K. Nelson
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc. (the
Company), certifies that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2004 (the Report) of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of September 26, 2004 and for
the period then ended.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 8, 2004



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Christopher F. Caesar                                   
|Christopher F. Caesar                                       
|Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer



43
#### Royal York Owners Corp. et al., Appellants, v Royal York Associates, L.P., Respondent. (And Another Action.)

Submitted December 31, 2007;

decided March 18, 2008

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as modified Supreme Court’s order in the second action, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine that action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
----

|   | a) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m(a)      or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the  Report. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 14,      2008 | /s/ Deborah      C.  Wright |
|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                    | Deborah      C.  Wright     |

----
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 22-20219 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee , versus Pedro Alfonso Lopez-Ovalle, Defendant—Appellant . ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21-CR-437-1

______________________________ Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Alfonso Lopez-Ovalle has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lope z-Ovalle has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 27, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-20219 Document: 00516626086 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/27/2023No. 22-20219

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appe llate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 22-20219 Document: 00516626086 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/27/2023
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Anthony Craig Rouswell, * From the 50th District Court

of Baylor County,

Trial Court No. 5642.

Vs. No. 11-24-00044-CR * July 25, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
[ 883 NE2d 363, 853 NYS2d 537]

#### In the Matter of Javier R., an Infant. Robert R., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Decided February 19, 2008

*755APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Randall Carmel,*Syosset, for appellant.

*Michael*A. *Cardozo, Corporation Counsel,*New York City *(Scott Shorr*of counsel), for Administration for Children’s Services, respondent.

*Legal Aid Society,*New York City *(John A. Newbery*of counsel), *Law Guardian.*

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), appeal dismissed, without costs. Under the circumstances of this case, the dismissal of the underlying neglect proceeding on consent subsequent to the Appellate Division order rendered the appeal to this Court moot. Thus, we do not have occasion to pass on the propriety of the Appellate Division determination.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,094,353
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               51,231,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                (1,069,289)
<INVENTORY>                                 11,326,661
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            68,581,259
<PP&E>                                     115,100,244
<DEPRECIATION>                             (14,804,778)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             209,889,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       60,937,783
<BONDS>                                     54,277,874
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,187
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,482
<OTHER-SE>                                  93,842,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               209,889,212
<SALES>                                     50,087,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            50,087,729
<CGS>                                       43,972,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               43,972,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,207,530
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               600,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,946,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,551,414)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,100,938)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,450,476)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,450,476)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.08)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boykin Lodging Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Shereen P. Jones, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and
Investment Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Shereen P. Jones
Shereen P. Jones
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Investment Officer
May 9, 2005
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40945

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RODOLFO CARRANZA-VELASQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-01-CR-161-1

--------------------

December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rodolfo Carranza-Velasquez appeals his sentence following

his guilty-plea conviction for being present in the United States

after having previously been deported or removed following an

aggravated-felony conviction. Carranza-Velasquez argues for the

first time on appeal that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is

unconstitutional because it permitted the sentencing judge to

find, under a preponderance of the evidence standard, a fact
No. 01-40945

-2-

which increased the statutory maximum sentence to which he

otherwise would have been exposed. He thus contends that his

sentence is invalid and argues that it should not exceed the twoyear maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a).

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Carranza-Velasquez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed

by Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court

must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court

itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.