alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1) | this                Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006                (the                “Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with                the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act                of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))                and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | information                contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The                Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                August 17, 2006 |                                     |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                     |
|                                  | /s/                Eric W. Schrier       |
|                                  | Eric                W. Schrier           |
|                                  |                                     |
|                                  |                                     |
|                                  |                                     |
|                                  | /s/                Michael S. Geltzeiler |
|                                  | Michael                S. Geltzeiler     |
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANTHONY MICHAEL BOWDEN,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00057-CR

Appeal from the

384th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20160D05559)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until November 14, 2019. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. William R. Cox, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before November 14, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of October, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
#### Gerardo AMADOR; Maria Cruz Amador, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-74367.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.*

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

John E. Ricci, Esq., Law Office of Ricci & Sprouls, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Kurt B. Larson, Esq., Joanne E. Johnson, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gerardo Amador and Maria Cruz Amador, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.

*990The evidence the Amadors presented with their motion to reopen concerned the same basic hardship grounds as their application for cancellation of removal. *See Fernandez v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 592, 602-03 (9th Cir.2006). We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that the evidence would not alter its prior discretionary determination that they failed to establish the requisite hardship. *See id.*at 600 (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) bars this court from reviewing the denial of a motion to reopen where “the only question presented is whether [the] new evidence altered the prior, underlying discretionary determination that [the petitioner] had not met the hardship standard.”) (Internal quotations and brackets omitted).

Our conclusion that we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination that the Amadors did not make out a prima facie case of hardship forecloses their argument that the BIA denied them due process by failing to consider and address the entirety of the evidence submitted with the motion to reopen. *See Fernandez,*439 F.3d at 603-04.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HEALTHCARE RECOVERIES FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          24,674
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,758
<ALLOWANCES>                                       251
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,064
<PP&E>                                           9,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,170
<SALES>                                         39,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,277
<CGS>                                           18,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,951
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,961
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,959
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,002
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2003 of Closure Medical Corporation (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel
A. Pelak, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. (S) 78m(a) or (S)
78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Daniel A. Pelak
---------------------
Daniel A. Pelak
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                    UT
<CIK>                                             0000859792
<NAME>                              AMERICAN UINITED GLOBAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUL-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                    PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          90,988
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        9,818
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     42,103
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,909
<COMMON>                                           119
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       49,954
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            (37,280)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  12,797
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                48
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              89,511
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      4,772
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  35,781
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  142,909
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      163,650
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            (1,101)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     164,476
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     164,476
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         (5,054)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                    (581)
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          5,329
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,065)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   (3,065)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          12,093
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.26)



</TABLE>
Order filed, March 27, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00107-CV

____________

JUNE G. BARTLE, Appellant

V.

MAIN STREET ACQUISITION CORP., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 1

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-0067462

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 11, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Lynnette Erskine, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
```

[United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions (Plum Book), 1996]
[Independent Agencies and Government Corporations]
[Federal Reserve System]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

The Plum Book (United States Government Policy
        and Supporting Positions): 1996 EditionBRANCH: EXECUTIVE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEMLocationPosition TitleName of IncumbentPay PlanType of Appt.Level Grade or PayTenureExpiresWashington, DCChairmanAlan GreenspanEXPASII14 years01/31/2006Washington, DCVice ChairmanAlice M. RivlinEXPASIII14 years01/31/2010Washington, DCGovernorSusan M. PhillipsEXPASIII14 years01/31/1998Washington, DCGovernorEdward W. KelleyEXPASIII14 years01/31/2004Washington, DCGovernorLawrence B. LindseyEXPASIII14 years01/31/2000Washington, DCGovernorJanet L. YellenEXPASIII14 years01/31/2008Washington, DCGovernorLaurence H. MeyerEXPASIII14 years01/31/2002
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the ZAT1 AJT (04).

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections                           ( print page 45873)                        552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory Review.                    

*Date:*                         October 31, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ashlee Tipton, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-3849,                         *ashlee.tipton@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 26, 2017.

Michelle Trout,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-20987 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1996 and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          16,680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  237,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               254,479
<PP&E>                                       4,244,847
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,655,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,844,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,844,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,844,235
<SALES>                                        603,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               608,727
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               220,496
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                388,231
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            388,231
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   388,231
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    30.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    30.01
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 261 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 261

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit the leasing 
    of any area of the outer Continental Shelf for the exploration, 
     development, or production of oil, gas, or any other mineral.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2011

  Mr. Pallone (for himself, Mr. Garamendi, and Ms. Castor of Florida) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit the leasing 
    of any area of the outer Continental Shelf for the exploration, 
     development, or production of oil, gas, or any other mineral.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No New Drilling Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LEASING OF OCS FOR EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT, OR 
              PRODUCTION OF OIL, GAS, OR ANY OTHER MINERAL.

    Section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (16 U.S.C. 
1344) is amended--
            (1) by striking so much as precedes subsection (g) and 
        inserting the following:

``SEC. 18. PROHIBITION ON LEASING OF OCS FOR EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT, 
              OR PRODUCTION OF OIL, GAS, OR ANY OTHER MINERAL.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
lease may be issued for the exploration, development, or production of 
oil, gas, or any other mineral on the outer Continental Shelf.'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections 
        (b) and (c), respectively; and
            (3) in subsection (c), as so redesignated, by striking the 
        first sentence.
                                 <all>
```
CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY

#### Keene v. William F. Pier et al.

December 13, 1982

Case No. (Chancery) 32899

By JUDGE THOMAS R. MONROE

I [am] advising [counsel] of my conclusion regarding the motion of plaintiff to permit him to amend his plead* ings to correct a misnomer.

The Court has carefully considered the oral arguments and memoranda submitted by both counsel and am of the opinion that the motion should be granted.

The issue is whether plaintiff's motion involves a case of misnomer or an attempt to add a new party.

An examination of the evidence presented reveals the following. Plaintiff has received brochures from a California organization dealing in survival equipment and food stuffs; the mailings were by S.I. Equipment, Ltd.; no change in the mailing method, listing seller as "Survival, Inc.," and later "S.I."; the format of the brochures and products offered continued; plaintiff issued checks made out to "Survival, Inc." and "S.I." and these checks were duly accepted and items shipped; a check dated in 1976 payable to Survival, Inc., was deposited to the account of Survival, Inc.; checks dated in 1977 through April, 1978, issued to Survival, Inc., were depo* sited to the account of S.I. Throughout the times of communication between plaintiff and seller, there prevailed a similarity of interest and accord between the parties. The executive officer of S.I. Equipment, Limited, and *52registered agent is William F. Pier, the other defendant herein.

It appears that Survival, Inc., and S.I. Equipment, Limited, are one and the same.

A misnomer in a corporate name does not invalidate a contract when it is clear what corporation the parties intended. *Lataif*v. *Commercial Industrial Construction, Inc., et*al., 223 Va. 59 (1982).

If the right party is before the Court, although under a wrong name, an amendment to cure a misnomer will be allowed. *Jacobson*v. *Southern Biscuit Co.,*198 Va. 813 (1957).

The motion of plaintiff to amend to correct a misnomer is granted.
#### UNITED STATES v. SCHULZE et al.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

December 9, 1896.)

Customs Duties — Classibtcation—Antitoxi n.

Antitoxin is dutiable, under paragraph 59 of the tariff act of 1894, as a medicinal preparation not specially provided for, and is not entitled to free . entry, under paragraph 664, as vaccine vims.

This was an appeal by the government from a decision of the board of general appraisers, reversing the decision of the collector of the port of New York as to the classification of certain merchandise, imported by Schulze, Berge & Koechl. The merchandise was invoiced as “Blood Serum — Diphtheria Remedy,” and it was shown to he an agent for the prevention and cure of diphtheria, produced from the blood of horses by treatment with the diphtheria poison. The collector assessed a duty of 25 per cent, ad valorem, as upon a medicinal preparation. The importers claimed exemption from duty, directly or by similitude, or component of chief value, under paragraphs 367, 404, 470, or 664, Act 1894,

dames T. Van Rensselaer, Asst. IT. S. Atty.

Comstock & Brown, for defendant.

WHEELER, District Judge.

The tariff act of 1894 places a duty, by paragraph 59, on “all medicinal preparations not specially provided for,” and by paragraph 664 puts on the free list “vaccine virus.” This importation is of antitoxin. It was classified under the former paragraph, and the protest raised the question whether it should he free under the latter. Antitoxin is a different thing from vaccine virus. It comes from a different source, is used for a different although somewhat similar purpose, and operates in a different way. The former seems to cure disease, and the latter introduces a milder form to obviate what would he worse. The latter has such a well-defined meaning, applicable to one thing, that, against a first impression, it does not now seem capable of covering, by any implication, such a different thing as the former. Decision of general appraisers reversed.