alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2714 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2714

    To amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 to allow the 
 transport, purchase, and sale of pelts of, and handicrafts, garments, 
 and art produced from, Southcentral and Southeast Alaska northern sea 
            otters that are taken for subsistence purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2011

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 to allow the 
 transport, purchase, and sale of pelts of, and handicrafts, garments, 
 and art produced from, Southcentral and Southeast Alaska northern sea 
            otters that are taken for subsistence purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSPORT, PURCHASE, AND SALE OF PELTS OF, AND HANDICRAFTS, 
              GARMENTS, AND ART PRODUCED FROM SOUTHCENTRAL AND 
              SOUTHEAST ALASKA NORTHERN SEA OTTERS TAKEN FOR 
              SUBSISTENCE PURPOSES.

    Section 102 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 
1372) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Sea Otter Pelts and Products.--Nothing in this Act 
prohibits--
            ``(1) the transport, purchase, sale of, or any offer to 
        purchase or sell, any pelt of an otter from the Southcentral or 
        Southeast Alaska stock of northern sea otters that is taken for 
        subsistence purposes in accordance with section 101(b)(1); or
            ``(2) the transport, purchase, sale, export of, or any 
        offer to purchase, sell or export, any handicraft, garment, or 
        art that is produced from the pelt of the Southcentral or 
        Southeast Alaska stock of northern sea otters that is taken for 
        subsistence purposes in accordance with section 101(b)(1), 
        regardless of whether the handicraft, garment, or art--
                    ``(A) is traditional or contemporary; or
                    ``(B) is or is not altered significantly''.
                                 <all>
```
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of A.Q. , a child

, * From the 32 6th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 9706

- CX

.

No. 11

- 20

- 00 0 90

- C V * September 1 7 , 20 20

* Memorand um Opinion by Stretcher, J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

( Willson , J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, the

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 10.14



 Exhibit 10.14 
 Amendment One to the Under Armour, Inc. 
 Deferred Compensation Plan

 WHEREAS, the Company has established the Under Armour, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective June 1, 2007 (the
“Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee has the authority under Article 11 of the Plan to amend the Plan; and

 WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to clarify certain payment terms and correct certain provisions for purposes
of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”) in accordance with IRS Notice 2010-6. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment set forth in the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows effective June 1, 2007: 

1. By amending the next-to-last sentence of Section 4.3 to read as follows: 

“If, subject to the sole discretion of the Administrator, the petition for a cancellation and/or payout is approved, cancellation
shall take effect upon the date of approval and any payout shall be made in a lump sum in cash within sixty (60) days of the date of approval.” 
 2. By deleting Section 11.7. 
 3. By amending Section 16.16 to read as
follows: 
  

	 	“16.16	Distribution Upon Income Inclusion Under Section 409A. Subject to Section 409A, the Administrator in its sole discretion may accelerate the time or
schedule of a distribution under the Plan, or a distribution under the Plan may be made, at any time the Plan fails to meet the requirements of Section 409A. Any such distribution may not exceed the amount required to be included in income as a
result of the failure to comply with the requirements of Section 409A. No Participant shall have discretion with respect to whether a distribution shall be accelerated under this Section 16.16, and no Participant shall be provided a direct
or indirect election as to whether the Administrator’s discretion to accelerate a distribution under this Section 16.16 will be exercised.” 

 4. Except as hereinabove amended and modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2530 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for increased flexibility 

in establishing rates for reimbursement of State homes by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs for nursing home care provided to veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2011 

Mr. MICHAUD (for himself and Mr. MILLER of Florida) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for increased flexibility in establishing rates for reimbursement 

of State homes by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

for nursing home care provided to veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASED FLEXIBILITY IN ESTABLISHING 

4 PAYMENT RATES FOR NURSING HOME CARE 

5 PROVIDED BY STATE HOMES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1745(a) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2530 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘The Sec2 retary shall pay each State home for nursing home 

3 care at the rate determined under paragraph (2)’’ 

4 and inserting ‘‘The Secretary shall enter into a con5 tract (or agreement under section 1720(c)(1) of this 

6 title) with each State home for payment by the Sec7 retary for nursing home care provided in the home’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 

10 following new paragraph (2): 

11 ‘‘(2) Payment under each contract (or agreement) be12 tween the Secretary and a State home under paragraph 

13 (1) shall be based on a methodology, developed by the Sec14 retary in consultation with the State home, to adequately 

15 reimburse the State home for the care provided by the 

16 State home under the contract (or agreement).’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 subsection (a) shall apply to care provided on or after Jan19 uary 1, 2012. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00 621 -CV In re P aul Vin cent M orinville ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M TRAVIS COUNTY ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N The Petition for Writ of Mandamus is denied.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Waldrop a nd Henson Filed: De cembe r 19, 2007
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 313 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify that persons who enter 

into a conspiracy within the United States to possess or traffic illegal 

controlled substances outside the United States, or engage in conduct 

within the United States to aid or abet drug trafficking outside the 

United States, may be criminally prosecuted in the United States, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2011 

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself and Mr. SCHIFF) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify that 

persons who enter into a conspiracy within the United 

States to possess or traffic illegal controlled substances 

outside the United States, or engage in conduct within 

the United States to aid or abet drug trafficking outside 

the United States, may be criminally prosecuted in the 

United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 313 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drug Trafficking Safe 

3 Harbor Elimination Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES 

5 ACT TO CLARIFY CONSPIRACIES CONDUCTED 

6 WITHIN THE UNITED STATES MAY BE CRIMI7 NALLY PROSECUTED IN THE UNITED STATES. 

8 Section 406 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

9 U.S.C. 846) is amended by— 

10 (1) inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘Any’’; and 

11 (2) inserting at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b) Whoever, within the United States, conspires 

13 with one or more persons, or aids or abets one or more 

14 persons, regardless of where such other persons are lo15 cated, to engage in conduct at any place outside the 

16 United States that would constitute a violation of this title 

17 if committed within the United States, shall be subject to 

18 the same penalties that would apply to such conduct if 

19 it were to occur within the United States.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EX-32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the
"Report") of WI-TRON, INC. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Joe Nordgaard,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 17, 2006


                                        /s/ Joe Nordgaard
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Joe Nordgaard
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         October 2, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

      ( print page 45915)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 26, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 364 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2017-210, CP2017-318.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-21014 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6314

KEVIN HARDY, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus WARDEN, Maryland House of Corrections - Annex, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA98-2590-DKC) Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 23, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, AnnNorman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kevin Hardy filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices ofappeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on January 4, 1999; Hardy asserts that he gave his notice of appeal to a prison officer for mailing on February 16, 1999, which is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Hardy's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain anextension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of his appeal. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 11.1

CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002



|BEGINNING BALANCE |               | 11,058,668      
|----------------- | ------------- | ----------------
|                  |               |                 
|                  | NO. OF SHARES | CONTRIBUTION TO 
|DATE              | ISSUED        | WEIGHTED AVERAGE
|                  |               |                 
|January 4, 2002   | 20,000        |                 
|March 5, 2002     | 60,000        |                 
|March 12, 2002    | 20,000        |                 
|April 17, 2002    | 1,128,368     |                 
|August 30, 2002   | 10            |                 



|Net Loss for the period | $1,327,159
|----------------------- | ----------
|Weighted average shares | 11,825,387
|Net Loss per share      | $(0.11)
Exhibit
10.13





AMENDMENT
TO THE


TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC


2000
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN









WHEREAS, Texas Eastern
Products Pipeline Company, LLC (“TEPPCO”) maintains the Texas Eastern Products
Pipeline Company LLC 2000 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (the “Plan”);
and




WHEREAS,the Plan has been in
operational compliance with Section 409A and the applicable regulatory guidance
thereunder; and




WHEREAS, TEPPCO has determined
that the Plan should be amended to be in documentary compliance with Section
409A, any exceptions thereo, and the applicable regulatory guidance thereunder;
and




WHEREAS, the transition rules
of Section 409A provide that TEPPCO has the right to amend the Plan until
December 31, 2008 in order to remain in compliance with Section 409A and any
exceptions thereto, and




WHEREAS, Section VI of the
Plan grants the Board the right to amend the Plan from time to
time.




NOW THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended as set forth below, effective January 1,
2009:




1.         
   Thesecond paragraph of Section 4.8 of the Plan is hereby amended in its
entirety, to read as follows:




“If while Awards remain
outstanding under the Plan (a) the Partnership or TEPPCO shall not be the
surviving entity in any merger, consolidation or other reorganization (or
survives only as a subsidiary of an entity other than an entity that was
wholly-owned by the Partnership or TEPPCO immediately prior to such merger,
consolidation or other reorganization), (b) the Partnership or TEPPCO sells,
leases or exchanges or agrees to sell, lease or exchange all or substantially
all of its assets to any other person or entity (other than an entity
wholly-owned by the Partnership or TEPPCO), (c) the Partnership or TEPPCO is to
be dissolved, or (d) the Partnership or TEPPCO is a party to any other corporate
transaction (as defined under Section 424(a) of the Code and applicable
Department of Treasury Regulations) that is not described in clauses (a), (b) or
(c) of this sentence (each such event is referred to herein as a “Corporate
Change”), then (x) except as otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, no later
than ten days after the approval by the Partnership or TEPPCO of such Corporate
Change, the Board, acting in its sole and absolute discretion without the
consent or approval of any Grantee, shall make such adjustments to an Award then
outstanding as the Board deems appropriate to reflect such Corporate Change,
subject to compliance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code or if
applicable, any exceptions to such provision.”












IN WITNESS WHEREOF,TEPPCO has
executed this Amendment in its corporate name and its corporate seal to be
hereunto fixed the 15th day of
December, 2008.














TEXAS
      EASTERN PRODUCTSPIPELINE
      COMPANY, LLC/s/
      Jerry E.
      ThompsonJerry E.
      ThompsonTPPL CEO
      & President
----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      L. Paul Latham                            |
|----------------------------------------------------|
| L.      Paul Latham                                |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer         |
| of      Southwest Royalties, Inc., the             |
| Managing      General Partner of                   |
| Southwest      Oil & Gas Income Fund X-A, L.P. |
|                                               |
| March      28, 2008                                |
|                                               |
|                                               |
| /s/      Mel G. Riggs                              |
| Mel      G. Riggs                                  |
| Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer of |
| Southwest      Royalties, Inc., the                |
| Managing      General Partner of                   |
| Southwest      Oil & Gas Income Fund X-A, L.P. |
|                                               |
| March      28, 2008                                |
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 11487 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
HERIBERTO GARCIA

- HERNANDEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 161

- 1

Before DAVIS, COSTA, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Heriberto Garcia

- Hernandez appeals the two

- year term of supervised release imposed following his guilty plea conviction for being found unlawfully present in the United States after previous deportation. He argues that his
sentence is unconstitutional bec ause it exceeds the maximum sentence for the 18 U.S.C. § 1326(a) offense charged in the indictment. Specifically, he contends that in order to trigger a sentencing enhancement under § 1326(b), the fact of

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 12, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-11487 Document: 00514509197 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/12/2018No. 17

- 11487

2 a prior conviction must be alleged in the indictme nt and proved to a jury. He correctly concedes, however, that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez

Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014). Thus, summary affirmance is appropriate

. Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of t he district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 17-11487 Document: 00514509197 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/12/2018