alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boykin Lodging Company (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Shereen P. Jones, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and InvestmentOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
/s/ Shereen P. JonesShereen P. Jones
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6386

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WALTER LEE SADLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-95-134-V, CA-99-3-V)

Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Lee Sadler, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

February 4, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on February 16, 2000. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as

the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Walter Lee Sadler seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Sadler, Nos. CR-95-134-V;

CA-99-3-V (W.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### ANIMAL PROTECTION AND RESCUE LEAGUE, a non profit corporation; Dorota Valli, an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Valerie O’ Sullivan, Intervenor-Intervenor, v. State of CALIFORNIA; The City of San Diego Department of Parks and Recreation; Jerry Sanders, Mayor; Does, 1 to 100, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-55319.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 4, 2008.

Decided June 17, 2008.

Bryan W. Pease, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Animal Protection and Rescue League, San Diego, CA, pro se.

Paul Robert Kennerson, Kennerson & Grant LLP, San Diego, CA, for Intervenor-Intervenor.

Valerie O’ Sullivan, San Diego, CA, pro se.

Christina Bull Arndt, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, George F. Schaefer, City Attorney’s Office, Jerry Sanders, George F. Schaefer, Law Offices of George F. Schaefer, San Diego, CA, Peter McVeigh, DOJ-*638U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.

The City of San Diego Department of Parks and Recreation, Law Offices of George F. Schaefer, San Diego, CA, pro se.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, ALDISERT,* and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Ruggero J. Aldisert, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM**

Appellants challenge the application of a state law that was interpreted by a state court to require the dispersal of a colony of harbor seals. Appellants contend that the state law conflicts with the local government’s obligations under the federal Marine Mammal Protection Act (“MMPA”). The district court dismissed the suit pursuant to the *Younger*abstention doctrine. *See Younger v. Harris,*401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971).

We lack federal question jurisdiction over this matter. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1331. Appellants are not challenging the grant or denial of a permit application under the MMPA. *See*16 U.S.C. § 1374(d)(6). This court does not otherwise have jurisdiction to consider appellants’ suit seeking to enforce the terms of the MMPA. *See Didrickson v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior,*982 F.2d 1332, 1338 (9th Cir.1992) (“[T]he MMPA does not provide for citizens to sue to enforce the statute”).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1180

MARY S. REID, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service Agency, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00267-MR-DCK) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 29, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary S. Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Sidney P. Alexander, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Mary S. Reid seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination action with prejudice. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 9, 2007. The notice of appeal was filed on January 31, 2008. Because Reid failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 20407 Summary Calendar

LA TONYA D. JUDON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. EP ENERGY, L.L.C.,

Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16

- CV

- 1834

Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * La Tonya Judon sued EP Energy for retaliation under the Family and Medical Leave Act (the “FMLA”) and for hostile work environment . The district court granted summary judgment for EP Energy and Judon appeal s the dismissal

. On appeal, Judon brings additional claims for the first time. We do not consider these claims. See Stewart Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. U.S. Auto

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 6, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-20407 Document: 00514861394 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2019No. 18

- 20407

2 Glass Disc. Ctrs., Inc. , 200 F.3d 307, 316

– 17 (5th Cir. 2000) ( “ It is a bedrock principle of appellate review that claims raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered. This rule is equally applicable in summary judgment

cases. ” ). First, Judon claims EP Energy dismissed her in retaliation because she requested leave under the F MLA

. Second, Judon argues, because of her disabilities, EP Energy created a hostile work environment. EP Energy responds that they terminated Judon because of her demonstrated pattern of poor performance, disciplinary actions, and insubordination. An emp loyer may point to a legitimate, non

- retaliatory reason for termination as a defense to a retaliation claim. See Ion v. Chevron USA, Inc. , 731 F.3d 379, 390 (5th Cir. 2013). Regarding her second preserved claim, Judon only points to two instances of hos tility over three years of employment to establish a hostile work environment. Neither instance rises to the necessary level to show a hostile work environment. Patton v. Jacobs Eng’g Group, Inc. , 874 F.3d 437, 445 (5th Cir. 2017). We have reviewed the briefs, the applicable law, and relevant parts of the record. The district court committed no reversible error. The judgment is AFFIRMED

. Case: 18-20407 Document: 00514861394 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/06/2019
Exhibit














December 19, 2017 


Multi Soft II, Inc.
4400 Biscayne Boulevard; 10th Floor
Miami, FL 33137


Re:    Amendment No. 6 to Revolving Credit Promissory Note


Reference is made to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note (the “Revolver”) dated April 23, 2012 in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants contained and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree to increase the Commitment Amount, as defined in the Revolver, from $350,000 to $450,000 and extend the Maturity Date of the Revolver to December 31, 2019 from December 31, 2018.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 6 to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note to be duly executed and attested, all as of the date first written above.


BORROWER:


MUTLI SOFT II, INC., a Florida Corporation




By:    /s/ Robert M. Lundgren        
Name:    Robert M. Lundgren
Director


LENDER:


VECTOR GROUP LTD., a Delaware Corporation




By:    /s/ Marc N. Bell            
Name:    Marc N. Bell
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
exv10w21







EXHIBIT 10.21




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE

SUPERIOR ENERGY

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN




     WHEREAS, Superior Energy Services, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the Superior Energy
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) effective January 1, 2008;



     WHEREAS, IRS Notice 2010-6 requires that the Plan be amended in 2010 to revise the delay of
payment provisions; and



     WHEREAS, Section 9.01 of the Plan states that the Company may amend the Plan;



     NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective January 1, 2009 , as follows:



I.




     Subsection (a) of Section 7.08, Delay of Payment, is amended and restated to read in
its entirety as follows:




	 	(a)	 	Delay Due to Financial Considerations. Any payment required to
be made on a date set forth under the terms of this Plan may be delayed if
payment on the originally scheduled date would jeopardize the ability of the
Company to continue as a going concern (in such case, payment will be made
during the first taxable year after such payment no longer would have such
effect).





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. One to the Plan is executed on the 30th day
of December, 2010.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	WITNESSES:	 	 	 	SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ A. Patrick Bernard
 


	 	 
	 	By:
	 	/s/ Danny R. Young
 

	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Danny R. Young
 

	 	 
	/s/ Danna Allo
 


	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Executive Vice President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                  DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company of Texas (Incorporated in Texas), a
subsidiary of Delphi Financial Group, Inc.

Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Incorporated in Illinois), a
subsidiary of Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company of Texas.

First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Incorporated in New York), a
subsidiary of Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.

SIG Holdings, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

Safety National Casualty Corporation (Incorporated in Missouri), a subsidiary of
SIG Holdings, Inc.

Safety First Insurance Company (Incorporated in Illinois), a subsidiary of
Safety National Casualty Corporation.

Safety National Re SPC (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands), a subsidiary of
Safety National Casualty Corporation.

Matrix Absence Management, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of
Delphi Financial Group, Inc.

Matrix Payroll Services, Inc. (Incorporated in California), a subsidiary of
Matrix Absence Management, Inc.

RSL Investors, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

Chestnut Investors II, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi
Financial Group, Inc.

Chestnut Investors III, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi
Financial Group, Inc.

Chestnut Investors IV, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi
Financial Group, Inc.

DFG II Corporation (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

DFG Corporation (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of DFG II Corporation.

Delphi Capital Management, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of
Delphi Financial Group, Inc.

RSL Marketing, Inc. (Incorporated in Nevada), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

Delphi Brokerage Company (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi
Financial Group, Inc.

Delphi Funding L.L.C. (Organized in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

Delphi Finance Trust I (Organized in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

Greenbrook LLC (Organized in Delaware), a subsidiary of Chestnut Investors III,
Inc.

TER ILLC (Organized in New York), a subsidiary of Reliance Standard Life
Insurance Company.
Order entered February 3, 2020

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01172

- CV

SATFRAZ TAJ AND ZUBE DA TAJ, Appellant s

V.

HIGHLANDER COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INVEST MENT, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366

- 02669

- 2018



### O RDER

Before Justices Brid ges , Osb orne, and Reichek

Before the Court are appellant s ’ February 3, 2020 (1) m otion for emergency stay of

foreclosure sale set for February 4, 2020 and (2) motion for emergency temporary injunction.

Appellants ’ motion s are DENIED

.

/s/ LESLIE OSBORNE

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended  quarterly  report of LaSalle Brands  Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Scott  Campbell,  certify to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Scott Campbell
---------------------------
Scott Campbell, President & CFO
October 11, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 45898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20979]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bureau of Labor Statistics


Data Users Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting and Agenda

    The Bureau of Labor Statistics Data Users Advisory Committee will 
meet on Thursday, November 9, 2017. The meeting will be held in the 
Postal Square Building, 2 Massachusetts Avenue NE., Washington, DC.
    The Committee provides advice to the Bureau of Labor Statistics 
from the points of view of data users from various sectors of the U.S. 
economy, including the labor, business, research, academic, and 
government communities, on technical matters related to the collection, 
analysis, dissemination, and use of the Bureau's statistics, on its 
published reports, and on the broader aspects of its overall mission 
and function.
    The meeting will be held in Meeting Rooms 1, 2, and 3 of the Janet 
Norwood Conference and Training Center. The schedule and agenda for the 
meeting are as follows:

8:30 a.m. Registration
9:00 a.m. Commissioner's welcome and review of agency developments
9:45 a.m. Changes to the North American Industry Classification System 
(NAICS) and the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system
10:30 a.m. Data Collection Tools with a Data User Focus and Improving 
``At a Glance'' Web pages
11:30 a.m. Comparing industry indexes between the International Price 
Program (IPP) and the Producer Price Program (PPI)
1:15 p.m. Data Repository and External Access initiative
2:15 p.m. Publicizing revamped modeled wages
3:30 p.m. BLS Public Data Application Programming Interface (API)
4:30 p.m. Meeting wrap-up

    The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the 
meeting should be directed to Kathy Mele, Data Users Advisory 
Committee, on 202.691.6102. Individuals who require special 
accommodations should contact Ms. Mele at least two days prior to the 
meeting date.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of September 2017.
Kimberley D. Hill,
Chief, Division of Management Systems.
[FR Doc. 2017-20979 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
```

[United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions (Plum Book), 1996]
[Independent Agencies and Government Corporations]
[National Transportation Safety Board]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

The Plum Book (United States Government Policy
        and Supporting Positions): 1996 EditionBRANCH: EXECUTIVE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARDLocationPosition TitleName of IncumbentPay PlanType of Appt.Level Grade or PayTenureExpires**OFFICE OF CHAIRMAN, VICE CHAIRMAN, 
              AND BOARD MEMBERS**Washington, DCChairmanJames E. HallEXPASIII..........12/31/1997Washington, DCVice ChairmanRobert T. FrancisEXPASIV..........12/31/1999Washington, DCMemberGeorge W. BlackEXPASIV..........12/31/1996Washington, DCMemberJohn A. HammerschmidtEXPASIV..........12/31/1995Washington, DCMemberJohn J. GogliaEXPASIV..........12/31/1998Washington, DCSpecial AssistantJames R. FinchGSSC15..................Washington, DCConfidential AssistantVicky D'OnofrioGSSC12..................Washington, DCConfidential AssistantShelly G. HazleGSSC11..................Washington, DCSpecial AssistantMarie T. DominguezGSSC14..................Washington, DCSpecial AssistantPamela A. WehnerGSSC15..................Washington, DCSpecial AssistantKevin F. PetersonGSSC15..................**OFFICE OF MANAGING DIRECTOR**Washington, DCManaging DirectorKenneth U. JordanESNA............................**OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL**Washington, DCGeneral CounselDaniel D. CampbellESCA............................Washington, DCDeputy General Counsel VacantES......................................**OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS**Washington, DCDirector, Office of Government AffairsPeter GoelzGSSC15..................**OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS**Washington, DCDirector, Office of Public AffairsJulie N. BealGSSC15..................
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Charles & Colvard, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Timothy L. Krist, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Timothy L. Krist   
|Timothy L. Krist       
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 14, 2009        

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.