alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
        
 <S>                                            <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            JUN-30-1998
 <PERIOD-END>                                                 JUN-30-1998
 <CASH>                                                            63,107
 <SECURITIES>                                                   2,987,375
 <RECEIVABLES>                                                          0
 <ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
 <INVENTORY>                                                      901,777
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               4,166,584
 <PP&E>                                                         2,810,589
 <DEPRECIATION>                                                  (363,403)
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 6,836,881
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          1,206,195
 <BONDS>                                                                0
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
 <PREFERRED>                                                            0
 <COMMON>                                                          77,891
 <OTHER-SE>                                                    15,494,286
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   6,836,881
 <SALES>                                                          120,395
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 129,611
 <CGS>                                                                  0
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  4,197,819
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     0
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (3,947,813)
 <INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (3,947,813)
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
 <CHANGES>                                                              0
 <NET-INCOME>                                                  (3,947,813)
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      (0.51)
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (0.51)
         


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of Commission Telephonic Business Meeting.

# DATES:

Tuesday, September 26, 2017, at 1:00 p.m. EST.

# ADDRESSES:

Meeting to take place by telephone.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Brian Walch, (202) 376-8371,                         *publicaffairs@usccr.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting is open to the public by telephone only.

## Participant Access Instructions

Listen-only, Toll Free: 800-967-7140; Conference ID: 9813037. Please dial in 5-10 minutes prior to the start time.

## Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Program Planning
    - Discussion and Vote on Report: Public Education Funding Inequality in an Era of Increasing Concentration of Poverty and Resegregation
    - Discussion and Vote on Timeline, Discovery Plan, and Outline for the Commission's Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 Report on School Discipline
    - Discussion and Vote on Revised Timeline for the Commission's Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 Report on Voting Rights

III. Adjourn Meeting

Dated: September 19, 2017.

Brian Walch,

Director, Communications and Public Engagement.

[FR Doc. 2017-20366 Filed 9-20-17; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

RAYKIA M. FAUCETT,

Appellant,

v.

UNEMPLOYMENT 

INSURANCE APPEAL BOARD,

 Appellee.

§

§ No. 461, 2023

§

§ Court Below–Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. N23A-06-010

§ 

§

Submitted: May 10, 2024

Decided: July 9, 2024

Before TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we find it 

evident that the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s Opinion and Decision

dated June 27, 2023, should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in

the Superior Court’s Opinion and Order dated November 15, 2023.1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-described 

decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and the Superior Court are

AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow

Justice

1 Faucett v. Unemployment Ins. Appeal Bd., 2023 WL 7601724 (Del. Super. Ct. Nov. 15, 2023).
#### Richard Cepulonis vs. Commonwealth.

April 21, 2006.

*Supreme Judicial Court,*

Superintendence of inferior courts.

*Richard Cepulonis,*pro se.

*Jane L. Fitzpatrick,*Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

The petitioner appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying his petition for relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. We affirm.

In 1976, the petitioner was convicted of illegal possession of a machine gun, among other offenses, in connection with a bank robbery. He was sentenced to serve from forty to fifty years in prison. Several years later, after this court twice denied him relief from his conviction, see *Cepulonis*v. *Commonwealth,*384 Mass. 495 (1981); *Commonwealth*v. *Cepulonis,*374 Mass. 487 (1978), he claimed for the first time, in a postconviction motion in the Superior Court, that, because he had also been convicted in 1973 of a weapons offense, his 1976 conviction was a second offense, and so, even though he was not charged as a second offender, he should be resentenced to no more than seven years, pursuant to G. L. c. 269, § 10 *(d),*as amended through St. 1974, c. 649, § 2. When that claim was denied, he appealed to the Appeals Court, to no avail. See *Commonwealth*v. *Cepulonis,*18 Mass. App. Ct. 919, 920 (1984). Thereafter, he filed an application for further appellate review, which was denied. See *Commonwealth*v. *Cepulonis,*394 Mass. 1101 (1985).

Two decades later, in 2005, he filed his G. L. c. 211, § 3, petition in the county court, raising the same claim regarding resentencing that he had raised in the Superior Court, Appeals Court, and in his application for further appellate review. The single justice denied his petition without a hearing. The petitioner argues, in essence, that he “has no appellate recourse” because none of his previous efforts to obtain relief has proved successful. “Our general superintendence power under G. L. c. 211, § 3, is extraordinary and to be exercised sparingly, not as a substitute for the normal appellate process or merely to provide an additional layer of appellate review after the normal process has run its course.” *Votta*v. *Police Dep’t of Billerica,*444 Mass. 1001, 1001 (2005). Accordingly, the single justice neither abused her discretion nor otherwise erred in denying the petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

The case was submitted on briefs.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Braintech, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Frederick Weidinger the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/  Frederick Weidinger
------------------------

Frederick Weidinger

Principal Executive Officer

Dated: May 15, 2009
exv10w17






Exhibit 10.17




LIGGETT GROUP LLC

100 Maple Lane

Mebane, NC 27302-8160




January 14, 2011




Mr. Ronald J. Bernstein

329 Circle Park Place

Chapel Hill, NC 27517



Dear Ron:




     This letter agreement constitutes an amendment to the Employment Agreement dated as of
November 11, 2005, (the “Agreement”), between Liggett Group Inc. (the “Company”) and Ronald J.
Bernstein (“Executive”). The Company and Executive wish to amend the Agreement as set forth below.
Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed
thereto in the Agreement.



     A. The Agreement is amended in the following respects:




     1. Section 3(f) of the Agreement is deleted and replaced by the following:




     (f) Annual Incentive Compensation. Subject to the approval of the VGR
Senior Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (together with any amendments thereto,
the “Plan”) at VGR’s 2011 annual shareholders’ meeting, during the Contract Term,
Executive shall be entitled to participate in the Plan, including any successor
thereto, commencing with the calendar year ending December 31, 2011, and be eligible
to receive an annual bonus based on a target bonus opportunity of 100% of Salary and
to receive such other long-term incentive awards as may from time to time be awarded
to Executive under the Plan. Annual Bonus payments and any long-term incentive
awards shall be subject to compliance with performance goals determined by the VGR
Compensation Committee in accordance with the Plan.




     2. Exhibit D of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety.



     B. This letter agreement constitutes an amendment to and a modification of the Agreement and
shall for all purposes be considered a part of the Agreement. Except as amended hereby, the
Agreement is confirmed and ratified in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect.



     Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by countersigning two copies of this letter
agreement in the space provided below and returning one of such copies to us.



Very truly yours,




LIGGETT GROUP INC.





 









 








Mr. Ronald J. Bernstein

January 14, 2011

Page 2




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/  John R. Long	 
	 	 	John R. Long 	 
	 	 	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary 	 
	 



The foregoing letter agreement

is consented and agreed to as

of the date first above written.





			
	By:	 	/s/  Ronald
J. Bernstein
	 	 	Ronald
J. Bernstein





Vector Group Ltd.

(as to Section 3(f) only)





			
	By:	 	/s/  Richard J. Lampen
	 	 	Richard J. Lampen

Executive Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7116

MICHAEL A. GARDNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01547-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: April 30, 2020 Decided: June 8, 2020

Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan P. Sheldon, SHELDON & FLOOD, PLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. 

Katherine Quinlan Adelfio, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, 

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Gardner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2018). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief 

on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. 

See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gardner has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
1 The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3117

___________ Angela R. Young; Charles D. Young, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. United States Department of Housing * and Urban Development; Ocwen * Federal Bank; Greg Whitworth, * [UNPUBLISHED] professionally and individually; Wilson * & Associates, P.L.L.C.; Robbie Wilson, * professionally and individually; John * Does, unidentified others, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 10, 2003 Filed: October 20, 2003

___________ Before BOWMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Charles and Angela Young appeal the district court’s 1 adverse disposition of their pro se housing-related claims. After careful review, we affirm the district court’s grant-2- of summary judgment to the United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, Wilson Associates, LLC (the Wilson Firm), and Robert M. Wilson, Jr.; and the court’s dismissal of Ocwen Savings Bank . Although the district court did not enter any judgment as to defendant Greg Whitworth, we conclude that the district court intended to dismiss him from the case. See Small Engine Shop, Inc. v. Cascio , 878 F.2d 883, 886-87 (5th Cir. 1989). We deny as moot Whitworth’s motion to be added to Ocwen’s pleadings. We also deny the Youngs’ request to transfer this appeal to the Federal Circuit. The motion of Wilson and the Wilson firm to be dismissed is granted. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________
258 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES AND GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION - Continued

Washington, DC President Vacant EX XS IV ...... ......

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION

El Paso, TX Commissioner John M. Bernal AD PA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Confidential Assistant Angela Plaza OT SC ...... ...... ......

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY COMMISSION: UNITED STATES AND CANADA

Marquette, MI Commissioner Thomas Louis Baldini ES PA ...... ...... ......

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

INTERSTATE COMMISSION ON THE POTOMAC RIVER BASIN

Rockville, MD Federal Commissioner Jean Packard WC PA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Federal Commissioner Daniel J. Weiss WC PA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Federal Commissioner Vacant WC PA ...... ...... ......

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

JAMES MADISON MEMORIAL FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION

Washington, DC President Paul A. Yost AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Director of Programs Lewis F. Larsen AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Director of Administration & Stephen W. Weiss

Finance

AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Academic Assistant Sheila Osbourne AD XS ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Special Assistant/Office Manager Norma J. Claytor AD XS ...... ...... ......

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

JAPAN-UNITED STATES FRIENDSHIP COMMISSION

Washington, DC Executive Director Career Incumbent ES CA ...... ...... ......
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2998 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to prohibit the delegation by the 

United States of inspection, certification, and related services to a foreign 

classification society that provides comparable services to Iran, North 

Korea, North Sudan, or Syria and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2011 

Mr. MCCAUL (for himself, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, 

Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. KING of New York, and Mr. OLSON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to prohibit the delegation by the United States of inspection, certification, 

and related services to a foreign classification society 

that provides comparable services to Iran, North Korea, 

North Sudan, or Syria and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ethical Shipping In5 spections Act of 2011’’. 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2998 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON DELEGATION OF INSPECTION, CER2 TIFICATION, AND RELATED SERVICES. 

3 Section 3316 of title 46, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following new sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(e) The Secretary may not make a delegation, and 

7 shall revoke an existing delegation made, to a foreign clas8 sification society pursuant to subsection (b) or (d) to pro9 vide inspection, certification, or related services if the Sec10 retary of State determines that the foreign classification 

11 society provides comparable services— 

12 ‘‘(1) in Iran, North Korea, North Sudan, or 

13 Syria; or 

14 ‘‘(2) for the government of Iran, North Korea, 

15 North Sudan, or Syria.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.58


                             AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO
               THE METLIFE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR OFFICERS
          (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2003) (THE "PLAN")

         The Plan is hereby amended in the manner set forth below:

     1.  The final sentence of Section 8 is amended to read as follows:

         Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Matching Contributions shall be
         credited in favor of a Participant during the suspension of such
         Participant's deferrals pursuant to Section 4.6 of this Plan, no
         Matching Contributions shall be credited in favor of a Participant to
         the extent such Matching Contributions would not have been vested under
         SIP as of December 31, 2004, and such Matching Contributions that would
         vest after December 31, 2004 shall be credited as provided under the
         MetLife Leadership Deferred Compensation Plan and not under this Plan.

     2.  This Amendment will be effective immediately upon execution.

     3.  Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the Plan (including any
amendments thereto) shall continue in full force and effect without amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment is approved.

PLAN ADMINISTRATOR


/s/ Margery Brittain
------------------------------------------------------


Date:     12/14/05
          ----------------------------

Witness:  /s/ Rose Alston
          ------------------------------------------------------
Image Technology, Inc.

            4407 Manchester Avenue - Suite 103 - Encinitas, CA 92024
                       (619) 436-1313 - FAX (619) 436-4175


     This  constitutes an Employment  Agreement  between Image  Technology  Inc.
(ITI) and John F. Grim.

     It is Image  Technology's Inc.  understanding that John Grim is leaving his
employment  at AT&T on his own  volition,  and there are no terms or  conditions
that would prevent John Grim from being employed by Image Technology,  Inc. John
Grim agrees to hold Image  Technology,  Inc. harmless from any actions that AT&T
would take against Image Technology, Inc.

     The Terms of this Employment Agreement are as follows:

     (a) John Grim will be paid a salary of $8,333.00 per month.

     (b) All travel expenses will be reimbursed by Image Technology, Inc.

     (c)  Medical  and  Dental  coverage  will  also  be  available  (as all ITI
employees have now).

     (d) A $25,000.00 yearly bonus will be paid thirty (30) days after the first
anniversary  employment  date.  In the event the cash flow  would not permit the
paying of the $25,000.00 bonus, it will then accrue into the second year.

     Image  Technology,  Inc.  will  offer 2% of the shares in ITI for $1.00 per
share.  The shares of ITI stock will be held in Trust by Walter G. Fuller  until
such time as the company has gone public or merged into another  company.  These
shares that are being held in John Grim's name will be turned over before any of
the above  actions were taken.  Should John Grim leave the  employment  of Image
Technology, Inc. before the company has gone public or merged, the stock will be
transferred back to Image Technology, Inc.

     Image  Technology,  Inc.  will  offer  John  Grim a seat  on the  Board  of
Directors.

     I believe this  Includes all of our  discussions.  Until such time as Image
Technology, Inc. has all the legal documents of the company finalized, this will
act as a legal and binding  Agreement  between Image  Technology,  Inc. and John
Grim for a period of two (2) years.


By:                                                      Date:  August 22, 1995
      Christ M. Rousseff, Chairman

By:                                                      Date:  August 22, 1995
      John F. Grim