alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from CSA Income
Fund Limited Partnership IV's Statement of Financial Position as of December
31, 1998 and Statement of Operations for the twelve months then ended and is
qualified in its entirely by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         560,193
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,134,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      59,956,146
<DEPRECIATION>                              30,958,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,691,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,169,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,691,553
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,987,102
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,424,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               266,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,626,363
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,670,654
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,670,654
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,670,654
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.22
<FN>
<F1>The registrant maintains an unclassified Statement of Financial Position.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On September 19, 2017, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in the lawsuit entitled 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *JW Aluminum Company,*
                     Civil Action No. 17-cv-02490-DCN. The United States filed this lawsuit under the Clean Air Act. The United States' complaint seeks injunctive relief and civil penalties for violations of the regulations that govern secondary aluminum production at the defendant's facility in Mount Holly, South Carolina. The consent decree requires the defendant to perform injunctive relief and pay a $230,000 civil penalty. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *JW Aluminum Company,*
                     D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-2-1-
                    ( print page 45614)
                    09845. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: *To submit comments:*
*Send them to:*By email
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.*By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,  Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 During the public comment period, the proposed Consent Decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: 
                    *https://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​consent-decrees.*
                     We will provide a paper copy of the proposed Consent Decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $18.50 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Henry S. Friedman, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2017-20877 Filed 9-28-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

p0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

136787(54) 

KNIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136787 

 COA: 276838 

Wayne CC: 05-515075-CK 

FAIRLANE CAR WASH, INC., PPJ 

ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., JOHN MASOURAS, and 

JAMES MASOURAS, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 1, 

2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

 CAVANAGH, J., not participating due to a familial relationship with counsel of 

record.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 14, 2021

No. 04-20-00236-CV

Lesley WENGER, City of Castle Hills Alderman Place 4 and Sylvia Gonzalez, City of Castle 

Hills Alderman Place 3,

Appellants

v.

Mike FLINN, Bonnie Hopke, Vince Martinez, Scott Gray, Ginger Magers and Robbie Casey,

Appellees

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CI-15722

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

We grant appellants’ unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a motion for 

rehearing and request for en banc reconsideration. We order the motion for rehearing or en banc 

reconsideration be filed by October 28, 2021.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of October, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 04-0971

((((((((((((((((

In Re  Ford Motor Company

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.The unopposed motion to abate appeal, filed on July 13, 2005, is granted, and this case is **ABATED** to allow the parties to proceed with settlement negotiations.

2.This case is removed from the Court's active docket until September 20, 2005, by which time the parties must file either a status report or a motion to dismiss.  The parties shall immediately notify this Court about any changes in status in the settlement proceedings.

Done at the City of Austin, this 22nd day of July, 2005.

Andrew Weber, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1998 and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          47,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,538
<PP&E>                                       4,406,130
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,025,706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 448,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               97
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     448,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   448,962
<SALES>                                        680,756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               682,327
<CGS>                                          638,962
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  638,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               806,359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (762,994)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (762,994)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (762,994)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (69.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (69.63)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Keith A. Katkin, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of AVANIR Pharmaceuticals;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. [Omitted]  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Dated: December 19, 2007 /s/ Keith A Katkin   Keith A. Katkin   President and Chief Executive Officer
1 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont 

____________________ 

NO. 09-17-00437-CR 

____________________ 

LEVI LEVINESS, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

________________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the 163rd District Court 

Orange County, Texas 

Trial Cause No. B160503-R

________________________________________________________________________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Levi Leviness has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.2. A request to dismiss the appeal is signed by appellant personally and joined by 

counsel of record. No opinion has issued in this appeal. The motion is granted, and 

the appeal is therefore dismissed. 

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

 ________________________________ 

 CHARLES KREGER 

 Justice 
2 

Submitted on May 22, 2018 

Opinion Delivered May 23, 2018 

Do Not Publish 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                             140
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    365,880
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               752,745
<PP&E>                                         159,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,917
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,777,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,278,525
<BONDS>                                        215,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,678
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,399,086
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,777,696
<SALES>                                          2,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,799
<CGS>                                            2,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,279
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               621,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (966,836)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (966,836)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (966,836)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 14, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-61056

Summary Calendar

MIGUEL ALBERT MONTILLA,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A75 728 636

----------------------------------------------------------------

Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Miguel Albert Montilla has filed a petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals denying him asylum or withholding of removal. For purposes of the instant petition, the

immigration judge’s decision is the final agency determination for judicial review. See

Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft, 303 F.3d 341, 348 (5th Cir. 2002). We will uphold the factual finding
-2-

that an alien is not eligible for asylum or withholding of removal if that finding is supported by

substantial evidence. Gomez-Mejia v. INS, 56 F.3d 700, 702 (5th Cir. 1995). 

Montilla argues that the immigration judge failed to explain why asylum was not warranted in his

case. Alternatively, he argues that the immigration judge failed to support her adverse decision

regarding persecution. This argument fails, however, because the immigration judge’s decision

reflects meaningful consideration of the relevant substantial evidence supporting Montilla’s claims.

See Abdel-Masieh v. INS, 73 F.3d 579, 585 (5th Cir. 1996) (addressing requirement that an alien

receive “full and fair consideration” of his claims). 

Montilla also argues that the three or four telephone calls he received were sufficient to establish

persecution because they “were in fact direct and unequivocal threats that [he] would be killed.”

Although threats of violence may be sufficient to support a finding of persecution, see TamaraGomez v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 343, 346-49 & n.8 (5th Cir. 2006), Montilla’s assertion that he

produced direct evidence of specific death threats by the police is not supported by the record.

Finally, because the immigration judge found no persecution, she did not err in failing to evaluate

whether there was a nexus between the alleged persecution and one of the five statutory grounds for

asylum. Cf. Tamara-Gomez, 447 F.3d at 349 (addressing nexus after finding persecution).

Montilla does not challenge the BIA’s conclusion that he was not eligible for the withholding

of removal. Accordingly, he has waived any such argument. See Rodriguez v. INS, 9 F.3d 408, 414

n.15 (5th Cir. 1993). 

PETITION DENIED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 27, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 27, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20I0157. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. KEVIN R. SINYARD et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2016CV273202
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 15245 and #15246; NEW HAMPSHIRE Disaster Number NH-00038]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Hampshire (FEMA-4329-DR), dated August 9, 2017.

# DATES:

Issued on September 11, 2017.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/09/2017.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/09/2018.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of New Hampshire, dated 08/09/2017, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Incident:*                     Severe Storms and Flooding.                

*Incident Period:*                     07/01/2017 through 07/02/2017.                

*Primary Counties:*                     Coos.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2017-19735 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P