alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Yessenia Guadalupe RIVAS-GARCIA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. *598Yessenia Guadalupe Rivas-Garcia, Petitioner, v. Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 05-77300, 06-71901.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2008.*

Filed June 13, 2008.

Martin Roy Robles, Teresa Salazar, Law Office of Martin Resendez Guajardo, P.C., San Francisco, CA, Christopher J. Stender, Stender & Pope, PC, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Leslie McKay, William C. Minick, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: WALLACE and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and TIMLIN,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Robert J. Timlin, United States District Court for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Rivas-Garcia petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (Board) decision denying her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture *599(CAT), and the Board’s subsequent denial of her motion to reopen. We deny her petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion that Rivas-Garcia failed to demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 & n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Rivas-Garcia never challenged the Board’s conclusion that she failed to establish past persecution and admits that the single incident she suffered in El Salvador did not amount to persecution. Because Rivas-Garcia failed to establish past persecution or to present “credible, direct, and specific evidence in the record of facts that would support a reasonable fear of persecution,” *Pedro-Mateo v. INS,*224 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted), she has not presented evidence that would compel reversal of the Board’s determination that she has no well-founded fear of future persecution and is therefore ineligible for asylum, withholding of removal, or CAT relief.

The Board did not abuse its discretion when it denied Rivas-Garcia’s motion to reopen. *See Ontiveros-Lopez v. INS,*213 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir.2000). The evidence Rivas-Garcia presented in her motion to reopen did not demonstrate *prima facie*eligibility for relief because the generic evidence did not “reveal[] a reasonable likelihood that the statutory requirements for relief have been satisfied.” *Ordonez v. INS,*345 F.3d 777, 785 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1




Certification
of principal executive officer




I, Robert
A. Altieri, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
of Carrollton Bancorp (the “Registrant”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




(1) such
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results
of operations of Carrollton Bancorp.




/s/
      Robert
      A. AltieriRobert
      A. AltieriPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 3,
      2009
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report of Consortium Service
Management  Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30,  2003  (the  "Report"), I, Donald S. Robbins, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August  19,  2003


                              /s/  Donald  S.  Robbins
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Donald  S.  Robbins
                              President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer

     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-QSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.





















                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
1 The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-2906

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Paul W. Moore, II, also known as * Antoine Petroye Roberts, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 24, 2006 Filed: April 24, 2006

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Paul W. Moore appeals from the district court’s 1 denial of his motion, purportedly brought under 18 U.S.C. § 3582, and the court’s denial of his subsequent Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-88676, 333-09565, and 333-97652 of First Keystone Financial, Inc. on Form
S-8 of our report dated December 28, 2006, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of First Keystone Financial, Inc, included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of First Keystone Financial, Inc. for the year ended
September 30, 2006.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
-------------------------------------
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 28, 2006
ACCEPTED

01-15-00964-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

12/15/2015 11:07:36 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/15/2015 11:07:36 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         3,681,685
<SECURITIES>                                   15,659,556
<RECEIVABLES>                                  741,711
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    626,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,975,156
<PP&E>                                         7,423,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (701,222)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28,026,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,482,163
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       132,561
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,963,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   28,026,465
<SALES>                                        4,821,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,321,699
<CGS>                                          2,447,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,447,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,365,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             291,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,782,857)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,782,857)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,782,857)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          886122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   116761
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      39003
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1161735
<PP&E>                                         1606497
<DEPRECIATION>                                  796673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3343176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1124592
<BONDS>                                         728555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          4395000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      10606822
<OTHER-SE>                                     (14486)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3343176
<SALES>                                         597567
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                597567
<CGS>                                           302571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   302571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7250727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              835415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (7791146)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (7791146)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (7791146)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATE      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.      1350)**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                            |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/  Timothy                Brink                                                     |   |   |   |
| Timothy                BrinkChief                Financial OfficerApril                16, 2007 |   |   |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2949 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2949

 To amend the Small Business Act with respect to goals for procurement 
 contracts awarded to small business concerns, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2011

Mr. Donnelly of Indiana (for himself, Mr. Boren, Mr. Altmire, Mr. Baca, 
 Mr. Barrow, Mr. Cardoza, Mr. Matheson, Mr. McIntyre, Mr. Michaud, Mr. 
   Ross of Arkansas, Mr. Schiff, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, and Mr. 
   Shuler) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Small Business Act with respect to goals for procurement 
 contracts awarded to small business concerns, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Opportunity Expansion 
Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. GOALS FOR PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS AWARDED TO SMALL BUSINESS 
              CONCERNS.

    Section 15(g)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``than 23 percent'' and inserting ``than 24 
        percent'';
            (2) by striking ``than 3 percent'' each place it appears 
        and inserting ``than 4 percent''; and
            (3) by striking ``than 5 percent'' each place it appears 
        and inserting ``than 6 percent''.
                                 <all>
```
13

‐ 920

‐ cv

Hallford v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., et al.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

R ULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT

. C ITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER

J ANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY F EDERAL R ULE OF A PPELLATE P ROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT ’ S

L OCAL R ULE 32.1.1. W HEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT

, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER

THE F EDERAL A PPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE ( WITH THE NOTATION “ SUMMARY ORDER ”). A PARTY CITING A

SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL

.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second

Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley

Square, in the City of New York, on the 28 th day of February, two thousand

fourteen.

PRESENT: AMALYA L. KEARSE

RICHARD C. WESLEY,

CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY,

Circuit Judges.

________________ _______________ _____________ EVERETTE HALLFORD,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant

,

‐ v. ‐ No. 13

‐ 920

‐ cv

FOX ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., Peter F. CHERNIN, CHERNIN

ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Richard Timothy KRING, AKA Tim KRING, Kiefer

SUTHERLAND,

Defendants

‐ Appellees

,2 TAILWIND PRODUCTIONS,

Defendant

.

________________ _______________ _____________ FOR APPELLANT: JOSEPH D. NOHAVICKA, Pardalis & Nohavicka, LLP,

New York, NY.

FOR APPELLEES: JONATHAN NEIL STRAUSS (Jonathan Zavin, on the

brief ), Loeb & Loeb LLP, New York, NY.

________________ _______________ _____________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of

New York (William H. Pauley III, Judge ).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,

ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the order of the district court be and hereby

is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant Everette Hallford brought this action against Fox

Entertainment Group, Inc., and others in the United States District Court for the

Southern District of New York. Hallford alleges that Defendants’ television show

infringed the copyright in his screenplay. The district court dismissed Hallford’s

complaint by memorandum order and opinion dated February 13, 2013. Hallford

now appeals.3 We AFFIRM for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court

in its opinion.

FOR THE COURT:

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 1999 and January 31, 1999, the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Nine Months ended October 31, 1999
and 1998, and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months
ended October 31, 1999 and 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,674
<SECURITIES>                                       308
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (757)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,760
<PP&E>                                           6,388
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,628)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,617
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           141
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,163
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,248
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   335
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (306)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    965
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                965
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       965
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>