alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2719 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To ensure public access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain in the Hanford Reach National Monument for educational, recreational, historical, scientific, cultural, and 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2719 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rattlesnake Mountain 

3 Public Access Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) The Hanford Reach National Monument is 

7 public land that belongs to the American people. 

8 (2) The United States Fish and Wildlife Serv9 ice’s Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) for 

10 the Monument restricts public access to large por11 tions of the Monument, including the summit of 

12 Rattlesnake Mountain. 

13 (3) Public access to Rattlesnake Mountain is 

14 important for educational, recreational, historical, 

15 scientific, and cultural purposes. 

16 (4) Rattlesnake Mountain reaches an elevation 

17 of 3,660 feet above sea level—the highest elevation 

18 of the Monument, and provides unparalleled scenic 

19 views over the Monument, the Hanford Site, and the 

20 Columbia River. 

21 (5) Public access to Rattlesnake Mountain will 

22 increase tourism interest in the Monument and will 

23 provide economic benefits to local governments. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2719 RFS 

1 SEC. 3. ENSURING PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE SUMMIT OF 

2 RATTLESNAKE MOUNTAIN IN THE HANFORD 

3 REACH NATIONAL MONUMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

5 provide public access to the summit of Rattlesnake Moun6 tain in the Hanford Reach National Monument for edu7 cational, recreational, historical, scientific, cultural, and 

8 other purposes, including— 

9 (1) motor vehicle access; and 

10 (2) pedestrian and other nonmotorized access. 

11 (b) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary of 

12 the Interior may enter into cooperative agreements to fa13 cilitate access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain— 

14 (1) with the Secretary of Energy, the State of 

15 Washington, or any local government agency or 

16 other interested persons, for guided tours, including 

17 guided motorized tours to the summit of Rattlesnake 

18 Mountain; and 

19 (2) with the Secretary of Energy, and with the 

20 State of Washington or any local government agency 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 2719 RFS 

1 or other interested persons, to maintain the access 

2 road to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 15, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 292 

AN ACT 

To amend title 44, United States Code, to eliminate the 

mandatory printing of bills and resolutions for the use 

of offices of Members of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 292 EH

1 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF MANDATORY PRINTING OF 

2 BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS FOR USE OF OF3 FICES OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

4 (a) ELIMINATION OF MANDATORY PRINTING.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 44, United 

6 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 

7 706 the following new section: 

8 ‘‘§ 706A. Prohibiting printing of bills and resolutions 

9 for use of offices of Members of Congress 

10 ‘‘(a) NO PRINTING PERMITTED.—The Public Printer 

11 shall make bills and resolutions available for the use of 

12 offices of Members of Congress only in an electronic for13 mat which is accessible through the Internet. 

14 ‘‘(b) MEMBER OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this sec15 tion, a ‘Member of Congress’ means a Senator or a Rep16 resentative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, 

17 the Congress.’’. 

18 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 706 

19 of such title is amended— 

20 (A) by striking ‘‘There shall be printed’’ 

21 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘Subject to 

22 section 706A, there shall be printed’’; and 

23 (B) by striking ‘‘Of concurrent and simple 

24 resolutions’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to section 

25 706A, of concurrent and simple resolutions’’. 
3 

•HR 292 EH

1 (3) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec2 tions of chapter 7 of such title is amended by insert3 ing after the item relating to section 706 the fol4 lowing new item: 

‘‘706A. Prohibiting printing of bills and resolutions for use of offices of Members of Congress.’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this Act shall take effect upon the expiration of the 3- 

7 month period which begins on the date of the enactment 

8 of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 18, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 292 

AN ACT 

To amend title 44, United States Code, to eliminate 

for the use of offices of Members of Congress. the mandatory printing of bills and resolutions
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19


                         AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT

         This Amendment is executed as of the 29th day of July, 2001, by and
between GCG Acquisitions, LLP, or its assigns ("Buyer") and Healthcare
Recoveries, Inc. ("Seller").

                                    RECITALS

         1.       Buyer and Seller entered into a Purchase Agreement having an
Acceptance Date of June 29, 2001 for property located at 5455 South Westridge
Avenue, New Berlin, Wisconsin ("Property").

         2.       During Buyer's due diligence on the Property, the parties have
learned that the parking ratio on the Property is not as represented. Therefore
the parties desire to allow Buyer the opportunity to attempt to obtain approvals
for the addition of parking spaces on the Property and to extend the Contingency
Period.

         3.       In order to accomplish this change in parking ratios and add
more parking spaces to the Property, the Buyers desire to enter into this
Amendment.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1.       The Contingency Period set forth in Section 4.9 of the
Purchase Contract is amended to provide that it expires on October 30, 2001.
Buyer shall retain the right to extend the Contingency Period for thirty (30)
days, as set forth in the Purchase Contract.

         2.       The following is added to Section 4.5.5 of the Purchase
Contract:

                  Buyer further obtaining all necessary approvals (including
         governmental and Wispark approval) for Buyer's plans to expand the
         parking at the Property, to provide for a parking ratio of between 4
         and 5 spaces per 1000 square feet of building area at the Property, in
         an economically feasible manner. Buyer's plans to expand the parking
         shall be at Buyer's sole discretion. Buyer and Seller further agreeing
         upon a purchase price reduction to offset the Buyer's cost to expand
         the parking at the Property, as described in this Amendment.

         3.       Capitalized terms used herein shall have the meaning ascribed
to them in the Offer.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Amendment as of the
date first above written.



                                        GCG ACQUISITIONS, LLP


                                        By: /s/ DAVID J. WEISS
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: David J. Weiss
                                           Title: Partner


                                        HEALTHCARE RECOVERIES, INC.


                                        By: /s/ DOUGLAS R. SHARPS
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: Douglas R. Sharps
                                           Title: CFO
**Exhibit 99.2**

** **

**Certificationof**

**ChiefFinancial Officer of**

**Gold BancCorporation, Inc.**

** **

I,Rick J. Tremblay, Chief Financial Officer of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.,hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (a) |   | The Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March 31, 2002, which accompanies  this certification, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                                    |
|-----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b) |   | The information contained in the Amendment  No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months  ended March 31, 2002, which accompanies this certification, fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc. |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Gold Banc Corporation, Inc. and will beretained by Gold Banc Corporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated:  May  15, 2003 |
|----------------------------|
|                       | /s/ Rick J. Tremblay |   |
|                       | Rick J. Tremblay |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
252 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES AND GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION - Continued

Washington, DC Counsel Katherine E. Dennis GS SC 13 ...... ......

 Do........... Special Assistant Judy A. O'Beirne GS SC 10 ...... ......

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE

Washington, DC Director C. Richard Barnes EX PAS III ...... ......

 Do........... Deputy Director George W. Buckingham ES TA ...... 2 years 01/02/02

 Do........... National Representative Career Incumbent ES CA ...... ...... ......

 Do........... Director, Federal Mediation & Vella M. Traynham

Conciliation Service 

Reengineering Project

ES TA ...... ...... 12/11/00

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

Washington, DC Chairman Mary L. Jordan EX PAS III 6 years 08/30/02

 Do........... Special Assistant to the Chairman Marc L. Marks ES TA ...... 6 months 10/20/00

 Do........... Attorney Advisor Thomas A. Stock GS SC 15 ...... ......

 Do........... Attorney Advisor (General) Elizabeth S. Symonds GS SC 15 ...... ......

Christina Elizabeth 

Rosas

 Do........... Confidential Assistant GS SC 10 ...... ......

 Do........... Confidential Assistant Pamela Chislom GS SC 9 ...... ......

OFFICE OF THE 

COMMISSIONERS

 Do........... Member Robert H. Beatty EX PAS IV 6 years 08/30/04

 Do........... Member James C. Riley EX PAS IV ...... ......

 Do........... Member Theodore V. Verheggen EX PAS IV 6 years 08/30/02

 Do........... Member Vacant EX PAS IV ...... ......

 Do........... Attorney Advisor Elizabeth Ebner GS SC 15 ...... ......

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL 

COUNSEL

 Do........... General Counsel Norman Gleichman ES NA ...... ...... ......

OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE 

DIRECTOR

 Do........... Executive Director Career Incumbent ES CA ...... ...... ......

Location Position Title Name of Incumbent

Pay

Plan

Type 

of

Appt.

Level,

Grade, or

Pay

Tenure Expires

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Washington, DC Chairman Alan Greenspan EX PAS II 14 years 01/31/06

 Do........... Vice Chairman Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. EX PAS III 14 years 01/31/00
#### Michael Duane MARLIN, Appellant, v. J. JIMENEZ; E.J. Prince, Dr.; S. Dawson; S. Smith; J. Dube-Gilley; G. Toliver; E. Taylor; L. Sanders; G. Thompson, Assistant Warden; Emma J. Mitchell, Region Health Services Administrator, Appellees.

No. 06-3491.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 23, 2008.

Filed: June 27, 2008.

Michael Duane Marlin, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Gwendolyn Dewees Hodge, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Appellees.

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Michael Duane Marlin appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action brought under *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcot*
      *504
      *ics,*408 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Marlin’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. *See Popoalii v. Corr. Med. Servs.,*512 F.3d 488, 499 (8th Cir.2008) (standard of review). However, the claims against defendant E. Taylor arose from alleged failures that occurred shortly before the instant lawsuit was filed, and thus Marlin could not have administratively exhausted those claims before filing suit and dismissal was required. *See Johnson v. Jones,*340 F.3d 624, 626-28 (8th Cir.2003). Accordingly, we affirm, but we revise the dismissal of the claims against defendant Taylor to be without prejudice. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Marlin’s motion for appointment of counsel.

. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting in part the report and recommendations of the Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-10573

consolidated with

No. 19-10782

Summary Calendar

Christopher Wooten, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Stan Parker, Howard County Sheriff; 

Timothy D. Yeats, Howard County Judge, 118th District; 

Colleen Barton, Howard County District Clerk; 

FNU Averett, Howard County Deputy Sheriff; 

FNU Buchanan, Howard County Deputy Sheriff; 

Robert H. Moore, III, Judge; 

Timothy Green, Magistrate, Howard County; 

FNU Green, Judge, Howard County, 

Defendants—Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 1:17-CV-12

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 1, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-10573 Document: 00515655921 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/01/2020
No. 19-10573

No. 19-10782

2

Before King, Smith, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Christopher Wooten, Texas prisoner # 2089854, appeals the dismissal without prejudice, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), of his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and the denial of his postjudgment motion under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). We review both for abuse of discretion. See Coleman v. Sweetin, 745 F.3d 756, 766 (5th Cir. 2014); Wilson v. 

Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 873 F.2d 869, 871 (5th Cir. 1989).

On appeal, Wooten primarily realleges the substantive claims that he 

asserted in his § 1983 complaint. He does not discuss the application of 

Rule 41(b) or otherwise meaningfully address the reasons why his complaint 

was dismissed or his Rule 60(b) motion was denied. Though we review pro se

briefs with the benefit of liberal construction, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 

519, 520 (1972), even pro se litigants must brief their arguments to preserve 

them, see Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224−25 (5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann 

v. Dall. Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). By not 

identifying an error in the disposition of his § 1983 complaint or Rule 60(b) 

motion, Wooten has abandoned any claim related to those rulings. See Yohey, 

985 F.2d at 224−25; Brinkmann, 813 F.2d at 748.

Thus, the judgment is AFFIRMED. Wooten’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED because he has not demonstrated exceptional 

circumstances. See Naranjo v. Thompson, 809 F.3d 793, 799 (5th Cir. 2015).

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances 

set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case: 19-10573 Document: 00515655921 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/01/2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    859182
<NAME>                   The Great American Golf Works, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1
<CURRENCY>                                        US Dollars

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                              1
<CASH>                                                       0
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             0
<PP&E>                                                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        0
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                   312
<OTHER-SE>                                               (312)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 0
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             0
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0





</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Optimal Group Inc.
(the Company), does hereby certify that to the best of the undersigneds
knowledge: 1)
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
 September 30, 2008 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
 Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated:
November 5,
 2008By:
/s/ Neil S.
 WechslerNeil S.
 WechslerCo-Chairman
 andChief
 Executive Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report or as a separate
disclosure document.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic 

and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of 

any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go 

to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 22-BG-502

IN RE GUILLERMO D. URIARTE

DDN2022-D089

A Member of the Bar of the 

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 463801

BEFORE: Easterly and Howard, Associate Judges, and Fisher, Senior Judge. 

O R D E R

(FILED— September 22, 2022)

On consideration of the accurate copy of the order from the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia suspending Guillermo D. 

Uriarte from the practice of law in that court for a period of 90 days; this court’s 

August 3, 2022, order suspending Mr. Uriarte pending resolution of this matter and 

directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, no 

response having been filed; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing 

that Mr. Uriarte has not filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, §14(g) affidavit, it is 

ORDERED that Guillermo D. Uriarte is hereby suspended from the practice 

of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 90 days. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 

483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable 

presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies unless one of the exceptions is 

established). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement, Mr. Uriarte’s 

suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully 

complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g). 

PER CURIAM