alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 4126** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TIMOTHY BALLARD , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis trict of North Carolina , at New Bern
. Louise W. Flanagan , Chief District Judge. ( 7:10

- cr - 00052

- FL

- 1 )

Submitted : September 27, 2011 Decided: October 24, 2011

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded for resentencing by unpublished per curiam opinion
. Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Kristine L. Fr itz, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Timothy Ballard appeals his 180

- month sentence received for his conviction in May 2009 for the di stribution of 50 grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A) (2006). Ballard ’s sole contention on appeal is that , because he was not sentenced until after August 3, 2010, he should have been sentenced under the provi sions of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111

– 220 , 124 Stat. 2372 (the “FSA”) . Although the Government resisted this line of argument in the district court, it now agrees before this c ourt that Ballard’s sentence should be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing. We, therefore, vacate Ballard’s sentence and remand this case to the district court to permit resentencing. By this disposition, however, we indicate no view as to whether the FSA is retroactively applicable to a defendant l ike Ballard whose offenses were committed prior to August 3, 2010, the effective date of the FSA , but who was sentenced after that date . We leave that determination in the first instance to the district
court. We dispense with oral argument because the f acts and legal contentions are adequately present ed in the materials before the C ourt and argument would not aid the decisional
process. VACATED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, James M. Uveges, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of Carrollton Bancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)   such
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the
information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
conditions and results of operations of Carrollton Bancorp.

|/s/ James M. UvegesJames M. Uveges Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 1, 2006 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

71

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CURRENCY>  U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                              13,848
<SECURITIES>                                         2,722
<RECEIVABLES>                                       15,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                           800
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    32,835
<PP&E>                                              11,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                       7,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      39,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                9,514
<BONDS>                                                212
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                27
<OTHER-SE>                                          29,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        39,751
<SALES>                                             24,747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    35,345
<CGS>                                                1,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        7,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    26,533
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      2,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                            97
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  2,298
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,298
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .08
                                               

</TABLE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 D0 38 1 . LARRY MCGUI RE v . THE STATE.

Larry McGu i re ap peal ed h i s c o n v i ct i on fo r rap e, ag g rav at ed s o d o m y , an d

as s au l t

. In M

cGu i r e v. S t a t e , 2 87 Ga. Ap p

. 7 6 4 (6 5 3 SE2 d 1 0 1 ) (2 00 7 ), w e rev ers ed

b as ed u p on t h e tri al co u rt ’ s fai lu re t o s tri k e a ju ro r fo r cau s e. See i d

. Aft er t h e cas e

was rem an d ed

, M cGu i re en t ered a g u i l t y p l ea. 1 On D ecem b er 1 8, 2 0 1 3

, t h e t ri al co u rt

en t ered an o rd er den y i n g M cGu i re’ s p ro s e m o t i o n to co m pel p ro d u ct io n o f h i s g ui l t y

p l ea t ran s cri p t

. On Ap ri l 1 6

, 2 0 1 5

, M cGu i re fi l ed a t wo -p ag e ap pl i cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary

ap peal s eek i n g t o ch al l en g e t h e v al i d i t y o f h i s g u il t y

p l ea.

As a t hres h o l d m at t er, we n o t e t here i s n o t h i n g i n M cGu i re’ s ap p l i cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal t o i n d i cat e h e ch al l en g ed t h e v al i d i t y o f h i s p l ea bel o w. Rat h er,

t h e o n l y o rd er M cGu i re i n cl u d ed was t h e Decem b er 2 0 1 3 o rd er d en y in g h i s req u es t

fo r a t ran scri p t

. An d M cGu i r e i s un ab l e t o ch al l en g e t hi s o rd er b ecau s e h i s

ap p li cat io n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal i s u n ti m el y

. An ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

ap p eal m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f t h e en t ry of t he o rd e r o r ju d g m en t t o b e

ap p eal ed

. See O CGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ). M cGu i re, ho wev er, fi led h is ap p l icat i o n 4 8 4 day s

aft er en t ry o f t h e o rd er h e i n cl u d ed wi t h h is d i scret i o nary ap pl i cat i o n

. T h e

req u i rem en t s o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s d i ct i o nal , an d t h i s Co urt can no t accep t an

ap p li cat io n fo r ap peal n ot m ad e i n co m p l ian ce t h erewi t h

. See Bo yl e v. S t a t e , 1 9 0 Ga.

Ap p

. 7 3 4 (3 8 0 SE 2d 57) (1 9 8 9 ). Acco rd i n g l y , t h i s ap p l i cat i o n i s h ereb y DISM ISSED

fo r l ack o f ju ri s di ct i o n

.

1 M cGu ire p led gu i l t y p urs u an t t o No r t h Ca ro l i n a v. Al fo r d

, 4 0 0 U

. S. 2 5 (9 1

SCt 1 6 0

, 2 7 LEd 2 d 1 6 2) (1 9 7 0 ), an d t h ereb y p led g u i l t y w i t ho u t ad m i t t i n g h i s g u i l t

. May 12, 2015C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 05/12/2015
Exhibit 13(a)

906 Certification

The certification set
forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule l5d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Richard Solomons, the Chief Executive
Officer, and Paul Edgecliffe-Johnson, the Chief Financial Officer of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 2, 2017



By:

/s/ Richard SolomonsName: Richard SolomonsTitle:  Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Paul Edgecliffe-JohnsonName: Paul Edgecliffe-JohnsonTitle:  Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6386

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WALTER LEE SADLER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-95-134-V, CA-99-3-V) Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter Lee Sadler, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on February 4, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on February 16, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Walter Lee Sadler seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sadler , Nos. CR-95-134-V; CA-99-3-V (W.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2000). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 45587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors met in open session at 10:02 
a.m. on Wednesday, September 27, 2017, to consider the following 
matters:
    Summary Agenda:

Disposition of minutes of previous Board of Directors' Meetings.
Memorandum and resolution re: Final Rule Establishing Restrictions on 
Qualified Financial Contracts of Certain FDIC supervised Institutions; 
Revisions to the Definition of Qualifying Master Netting Agreement and 
Related Definitions.
Memorandum and resolution re: Designated Reserve Ratio for 2018.
Summary reports, status reports, reports of actions taken pursuant to 
authority delegated by the Board of Directors, and reports of the 
Office of Inspector General.

    Discussion Agenda:

Update of Projected Deposit Insurance Fund Losses, Income, and Reserve 
Ratios for the Restoration Plan.
Memorandum and resolution re: Regulatory Capital Rule: Simplification 
to the Capital Rule Pursuant to the Economic Growth and Regulatory 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig, seconded by Director Richard Cordray 
(Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), concurred in by 
Director Keith A. Noreika (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), and 
Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, that Corporation business required its 
consideration of the matters on less than seven days' notice to the 
public; and that no earlier notice of the meeting than that previously 
provided on September 25, 2017, was practicable.
    The meeting was held in the Board Room located on the sixth floor 
of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: September 27, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-21062 Filed 9-27-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,387
<ALLOWANCES>                                       667
<INVENTORY>                                     66,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               141,227
<PP&E>                                          56,122
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 285,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,924
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,706
<OTHER-SE>                                     166,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   285,972
<SALES>                                        227,613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               227,613
<CGS>                                          117,940
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                95,785
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,403
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,036
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,367
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     81
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,286
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20


</TABLE>
CIRCUIT COURT OF WARREN COUNTY

#### Eric Ross Woods v. Commonwealth of Virginia

October 18, 1983

Case No. (Chancery) 4509

By JUDGE HENRY H. WHITING

This matter is before the Court on a petition for expungement of a criminal record brought under the provisions of Virginia Code 8 19.2-392.1. The charges were breaking and entering and grand larceny, and the prosecution was terminated by a not guilty verdict.

The defendant (in the criminal case, complainant in this cause) is a young man, born August 7, 1963, with no other criminal record. He attended college briefly in the fall of 1981 and plans to enroll later in a local community college. He presently is employed by a lumber company where he has worked since September of 1982, handles money and may later have to be bonded in order to do that but testified that he had never been refused a bond because of his record. He also testified that the jury was only out four or five minutes before it found him not guilty.

His counsel has argued that the above evidence establishes his entitlement to an expungement as a matter of law. The Court is unable to find that the continued existence and possible dissemination of information relating to his arrest has caused, has now caused or may cause circumstances which constitute a manifest injustice to him and therefore denies the petition.

The finding is based upon the following:

*92(1) The evidence does not show that the accused is in any position other than that of any other person who has been charged with a felony, found not guilty and released.

(2) While the jury was only out four or five minutes before it returned a verdict of not guilty, the evidence was sufficient for a grand jury to indict the accused and to create a jury issue as to whether he was guilty. If the jury had found the defendant guilty, the Court would not have set the verdict aside as it believes that sufficient credible evidence was introduced to justify a finding of guilt if the fact finder had so concluded.

(3) The Court cannot ignore the evidence adduced by the Commonwealth to the effect that the accused had taken a lie detector test prior to this trial and the results indicated that he was Untruthful in his answers about his involvement in this particular charge. While lie detector tests are not admissible in evidence and there is considerable controversy about their accuracy and the Court does not base its holding solely on the results of the test, it is one additional reason for denying the petition.

Counsel for the Commonwealth will draw an appropriate decree dismissing the petition and reflecting the petitioner's objections.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-39-2017]

On May 24, 2017, Nutkao USA, Inc. submitted a notification of proposed export-only production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 214 in Battleboro, North Carolina.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (82 FR 26663-26664, June 8, 2017). On September 21, 2017, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The export-only production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: September 22, 2017.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-20815 Filed 9-27-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

                                 LEAPNET, INC.

                     SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LEAPNET, INC.
                     EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

                                 JUNE 15, 1999

This Second Amendment (the "Amendment") to The Leap Group, Inc. Employee
Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan") is hereby established by Leapnet, Inc.
(the "Company"), effective as of June 15, 1999.

Whereas, the Board of Directors and stockholders of the Company have approved an
amendment to the Plan which would increase the number of shares of Common Stock
available for issuance thereunder from 3,500,000 to 5,000,000;

The first sentence of Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to delete the
number "3,500,000" therein and replace it with the number "5,000,000".

Following this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as
amended hereby.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its
duly authorized officer on this fifteenth day of June, 1999.

                                                         LEAPNET, INC.

                                                         /s/ Fred Smith
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Frederick Smith
                                                         Chief Executive Officer