alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 11




                             BOYKIN LODGING COMPANY
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,1997
                 (amounts in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCOME:
<S>                                                              <C>
     Income before extraordinary item                            $ 3,381 
     Extraordinary loss, net of minority interest                     -  
                                                                 ------
     Net Income                                                  $ 3,381 
                                                                 =======
PER SHARE AMOUNTS REPORTED TO SHAREHOLDERS--NOTE 1: 
     Income before extraordinary item                            $  0.36 
     Extraordinary loss, net of minority interest                     -  
                                                                 -------
     Net loss                                                    $  0.36 
                                                                 =======
PRIMARY:

     Weighted average shares outstanding                           9,516
     Dilutive stock options--Note 2                                   59
                                                                 -------
            Totals                                                 9,575
                                                                 =======
     Per share amounts
            Income before extraordinary item                     $  0.35  
            Extraordinary loss, net of minority interest              -  
                                                                 -------
            Net Income                                           $  0.35 
                                                                 =======

FULLY DILUTED:

            See Note 3.
</TABLE>



Note 1 --Per share earnings have been computed and reported to the shareholders 
           pursuant to APB Opinion No. 15, which provides that "any reduction of
           less than 3% in the aggregate need not be considered as dilution in
           the computation and presentation of earnings per share data."

Note 2--Dilutive stock options are calculated based on the treasury stock 
           method. For primary per share earnings, the average market price per
           share during the period is used. For fully diluted per share
           earnings, the period end market price per share, if higher than the
           average market price, is used.

Note 3--Fully diluted per share earnings for the three months ended March 31, 
           1997 are not disclosed because the quarter-end market price did not
           exceed the average market price for the three month period.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 22, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-19-00370-CV ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-SEVEN DOLLARS AND FORTY-ONE CENTS (1,167.41), ET AL., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-05623 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, J ustice Whitehill, and Justice Molb erg Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated J uly 10, 2019, we notified appellant the time for filing he r brief had expired. We directe d appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that f ailure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal w ithout further notice. To date, appellant has not filed her brief nor has she corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dism iss this appeal. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

190370F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDREDSIXTY-SEVEN DOLLARS AND FORTYONE CENTS (1,167.41), ET AL., Appellant
No. 05-19-00370-CV V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-05623. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Whitehill and Molberg participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee the State of Tex as recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Tabrina Manning.
Judgment entered August 22, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 45937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20960]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10148]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: ``David Hockney'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``David Hockney,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within 
the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to an agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. 
I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects 
at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about 
November 21, 2017, until on or about February 25, 2018, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office of the 
Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e3908680978a8c8dd1d7d6daa39097829786cd848c95"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f88b9d9b8c919796cacccdc1b88b8c998c9dd69f978e">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. Department 
of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of 
December 11, 2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
determinations be published in the Federal Register.

Alyson Grunder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-20960 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order entered April 1, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00149-CV

CONN APPLIANCES, INC., Appellant

V.

KENNY JONES, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01490-A

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s March 30, 2020 first motion for extension of 

time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no 

later than May 6, 2020. 

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 304 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 304

    To amend the limitation on liability for certain passenger rail 
 accidents or incidents under section 28103 of title 49, United States 
                     Code, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2011

 Mr. Gallegly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the limitation on liability for certain passenger rail 
 accidents or incidents under section 28103 of title 49, United States 
                     Code, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACCIDENT LIABILITY.

    (a) Amendments.--Section 28103 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ``The aggregate'' and 
        inserting ``Except as provided in paragraph (3), the 
        aggregate''; and
            (2) by adding at the end of subsection (a) the following 
        new paragraphs:
    ``(3) With the exception of defendants that are governmental 
entities, the liability cap under paragraph (2) shall be $275,000,000 
if the accident or incident was proximately caused by gross negligence 
or willful misconduct of the defendant.
    ``(4) For purposes of paragraph (3), the term `governmental 
entities' includes Amtrak and any other entity which is wholly owned or 
operated by a governmental body or bodies.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall be 
effective for any passenger rail accident or incident occurring on or 
after September 12, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 16, 2009

d0909 

# Order

September 16, 2009

138965

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138965 COA: 291350 Hillsdale CC: 08-321830-FH CHARLES EARL HOLMES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 14, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Envirosafe Corp. (the
"Company") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Guo, Yan Bin, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:
  * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  * the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Guo, Yan
Bin
 Guo, Yan
Bin
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 
 Date:
November 14, 2008
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,644,117
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,344,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                    35,547
<INVENTORY>                                  4,685,883
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,507,958
<PP&E>                                       4,999,418
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,499,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,268,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,873,431
<BONDS>                                        907,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       178,910
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,309,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,268,878
<SALES>                                     21,461,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,461,627
<CGS>                                       12,631,311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,631,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,303,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               120,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             181,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,450,285
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (345,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,795,285
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,795,285
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
1987

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS FOR THE DISTRICT OF

COLUMBIA

TWENTY-THIRD AMENDMENT

SECTION 1. The District constituting the seat of Government of the United States shall appoint in such manner as the

Congress may direct:

A number of electors of President and Vice President equal

to the whole number of Senators and Representatives in Congress to which the District would be entitled if it were a State,

but in no event more than the least populous State; they shall

be in addition to those appointed by the States, but they shall

be considered, for the purposes of the election of President and

Vice President, to be electors appointed by a State; and they

shall meet in the District and perform such duties as provided

by the twelth article of amendment.

SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this

article by appropriate legislation.

ENFRANCHISEMENT OF RESIDENTS OF DISTRICT OF

COLUMBIA

‘‘The purpose of this. . . constitutional amendment is to provide the citizens of the District of Columbia with appropriate rights

of voting in national elections for President and Vice President of

the United States. It would permit District citizens to elect Presidential electors who would be in addition to the electors from the

States and who would participate in electing the President and

Vice President.

‘‘The District of Columbia, with more than 800,000 people, has

a greater number of persons than the population of each of 13 of

our States. District citizens have all the obligations of citizenship,

including the payment of Federal taxes, of local taxes, and service

in our Armed Forces. They have fought and died in every U.S. war

since the District was founded. Yet, they cannot now vote in national elections because the Constitution has restricted that privi-
1988 AMDT. 23—ELECTORS FOR THE DISTRICT OF

COLUMBIA

1 H.R. Rep. No. 1698, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. 1, 2 (1960).

lege to citizens who reside in States. The resultant constitutional

anomaly of imposing all the obligations of citizenship without the

most fundamental of its privileges will be removed by the proposed

constitutional amendment. . .

‘‘[This] . . . amendment would change the Constitution only to

the minimum extent necessary to give the District appropriate participation in national elections. It would not make the District of

Columbia a State. It would not give the District of Columbia any

other attributes of a State or change the constitutional powers of

the Congress to legislate with respect to the District of Columbia

and to prescribe its form of government. . . . It would, however,

perpetuate recognition of the unique status of the District as the

seat of Federal Government under the exclusive legislative control

of Congress.’’ 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 311 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 311

   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to require that the 
 Commissioner of Social Security notify individuals of improper use of 
                 their Social Security account numbers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2011

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to require that the 
 Commissioner of Social Security notify individuals of improper use of 
                 their Social Security account numbers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Number Fraudulent 
Use Notification Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS OF IMPROPER USE OF THEIR SOCIAL 
              SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS.

    Section 205(c)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(I) In any case in which the Commissioner of Social Security 
determines that--
            ``(i) the social security account number in the wage 
        records provided to the Social Security Administration by an 
        employer with respect to any employee does not match relevant 
        records otherwise maintained by the Social Security 
        Administration, or
            ``(ii) the social security account number issued to an 
        individual has otherwise been used by any other person in a 
        fraudulent or otherwise illegal manner,
the Commissioner shall promptly provide the individual (if any) to whom 
such social security account number was issued with written 
notification of the Commissioner's determination.''.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7560** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. ZAMAN ASHRAF, a/k/a Pop , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:03

- cr - 00458

- REP

- 3 )

Submitted : July 22, 2013 Decided: August 2, 2013

Before MOTZ and GREGORY , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Zaman Ashraf, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Zaman Ashraf appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006) **.** We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ashr af , No. 3:03

- cr - 00458

- REP

- 3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant-Respondent, v Alfred Ford, Respondent-Appellant.

Submitted March 17, 2008;

decided March 20, 2008

*798Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., the Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the respondent-appellant on the appeal herein.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wndell ~tate5 <!Court of ~eaI5 

for tbe jf elleraI <!Circuit 

GPX INTERNATIONAL TIRE CORPORATION AND 

HEBEl STARBRIGHT TIRE CO., LTD., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

AND 

TIANJIN UNITED TIRE & RUBBER 

INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

AND 

TITAN TIRE CORPORATION AND UNITED STEEL, 

PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, 

MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED 

INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS 

INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

AND 

BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC. AND 

BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, 

LLC, 

Defendants-Appellants. 
GPX INTL TIRE CORP v. US 2 

2011-1107, -1108, -1109 

Appeals from the United States Court ofInternational 

Trade in consolidated case no. 08-CV-0285, Judge Jane A. 

Restani. 

ON MOTION 

Before GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. 

ORDER 

The United States moves for a 26-day extension of time, 

until June 1, 2011, to file its reply brief and an increase of 

7,000 words for its reply brief. GPX International Tire 

Corporation and Hebei Starbright Tire Co., Ltd. oppose. 

Bridgestone Americas, Inc. et al. and Titan Tire 

Corporation et al. move for a 26-day extension of time, until 

June 1, 2011, to file its reply brief. GPX International Tire 

Corporation et al. oppose. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motions for extensions oftime are granted. 

(2) The United States' motion for an increase of 7,000 

words for its reply brief is denied. 

MAY 182011 

Date 

FOR THE COURT 

lsI Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

FILED 

'.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

MAY 1 8 2011 

JA/t /i&lRBAlY 

ClERK 
3 

cc: Alan H. Price, Esq. 

s24 

Wesley K. Caine, Esq. 

Kathleen W. Cannon, Esq. 

Joseph W. Dorn, Esq. 

Roger B. Schagrin, Esq. 

Daniel L. Porter, Esq. 

Francis J. Sailer, Esq. 

Michael D. Panzera, Esq. 

Jeffrey D. Gerrish, Esq. 

GPX INTL TIRE CORP v. US