alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3232 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3232

   To improve the H-2A agricultural worker program for use by dairy 
    workers, sheepherders, and goat herders, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 14, 2011

     Mr. Owens (for himself, Mr. Welch, Ms. Hochul, and Mr. Hanna) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To improve the H-2A agricultural worker program for use by dairy 
    workers, sheepherders, and goat herders, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``H-2A Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT STATUS FOR DAIRY WORKERS, SHEEPHERDERS, AND GOAT 
              HERDERS.

    Section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a)) is amended by inserting ``who is 
coming temporarily to the United States to perform agricultural labor 
or services as a dairy worker, sheepherder, or goat herder, or'' after 
``abandoning''.

SEC. 3. SPECIAL RULES FOR ALIENS EMPLOYED AS DAIRY WORKERS, 
              SHEEPHERDERS, OR GOAT HERDERS.

    Section 218 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1188) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections 
        (i) and (j), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following:
    ``(h) Special Rules for Aliens Employed as Dairy Workers, 
Sheepherders, or Goat Herders.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this Act, an alien admitted as a nonimmigrant under section 
        101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) for employment as a dairy worker, 
        sheepherder, or goat herder--
                    ``(A) may be admitted for an initial period of 3 
                years; and
                    ``(B) subject to paragraph (3)(E), may have such 
                initial period of admission extended for an additional 
                period of up to 3 years.
            ``(2) Exemption from temporary or seasonal requirement.--
        Not withstanding section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a), an employer 
        filing a petition to employ H-2A workers in positions as dairy 
        workers, sheepherders, or goat herders shall not be required to 
        show that such positions are of a seasonal or temporary 
        nature.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.14

                      TRANSBOTICS SECURES AGV SYSTEM ORDER
                            IN THE PRINTING INDUSTRY

CHARLOTTE, NC - December 22, 2004 - Transbotics Corporation, (OTC BB: TNSB)
(www.transbotics.com), announced it received an order for an Automatic Guided
Vehicle (AGV) system from an existing customer in the printing industry. The
order totaling approximately $575,000 is to be installed over the next seven
months and will include multiple vehicles, controls, hardware, software,
engineering services and other related equipment.

" This is our second order from this important customer. The automation
equipment will be installed at an existing plant that they have in Pennsylvania"
stated Claude Imbleau, President of Transbotics Corporation.

For over 20 years Transbotics Corporation has specialized in the design,
development, support and installation of automation solutions with an emphasis
on Automatic Guided Vehicles (AGVs). The Company is a North American Automation
Solutions Integrator that manufactures, installs and supports various automation
technology including: AGVs, robotics, batteries, chargers, motors and other
related products.

Transbotics provides unique automation solutions to a variety of industries,
including automotive (tier one supplier), aerospace and defense, food and
beverage, paper and allied products, newsprint and publishing, entertainment,
microelectronics, plastics and primary metals. Transbotics' current customers
include Fortune 500 companies as well as small manufacturing companies.

This release (including information incorporated by reference herein) may be
deemed to contain certain forward-looking statements with respect to the
financial condition, results of operation, plans, objectives, future performance
and business of the Company. These forward-looking statements involve certain
risk, including, without limitation, the uncertainties detailed in Transbotics
Corporation Securities and Exchange Commission filings.


                                  ### #### ###

Contact:
Claude Imbleau
President & CEO
(704) 362-1115 (x 200)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Charles & Colvard, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Neil S. Boss, Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                
|----------------
|                
|/s/ Neil S. Boss
|Neil S. Boss    
|Controller      
|May 14, 2009
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 28, 2009

p0420 

# Order

April 28, 2009

136787(54)

KNIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136787 COA: 276838 Wayne CC: 05-515075-CK FAIRLANE CAR WASH, INC., PPJ ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., JOHN MASOURAS, and JAMES MASOURAS, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s October 1, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

C AVANAGH



### , J., not participating due to a fami lial relationship with counsel of
record.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 32 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 32

To amend the definition of ``homeless person'' under the McKinney-Vento 
Homeless Assistance Act to include certain homeless children and youth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

 Mrs. Biggert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the definition of ``homeless person'' under the McKinney-Vento 
Homeless Assistance Act to include certain homeless children and youth.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeless Children and Youth Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO DEFINITION.

    Subsection (a) of section 103 of the McKinney-Vento Homeless 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11302(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the paragraph at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3)(A) a child or youth who has been verified as 
        homeless, as such term is defined in section 725(2)(B)(i) of 
        the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
        11434a(2)(B)(i)), by a local educational agency homeless 
        liaison, designated pursuant to section 722(g)(1)(J)(ii) of the 
        McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
        11432(g)(1)(J)(ii)), and the family of such child or youth;
                    ``(B) a youth verified as homeless by the director 
                of a program funded under the Runaway and Homeless 
                Youth Act (42 U.S.C. 5701 et seq.), or a designee of 
                the director;
                    ``(C) a child verified as homeless under section 
                602 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 
                (20 U.S.C. 1401) by the director or the designee of 
                such program, and the family of such child; and
                    ``(D) a child verified as homeless under section 
                637 of the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9832) by the 
                director or designee of such program, and the family of 
                such child.''.
                                 <all>
```
CONGRESSIONAL PAY LIMITATION

TWENTY-SEVENTH AMENDMENT

No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of

Representatives shall have intervened.

REGULATING CONGRESSIONAL PAY

Referred to the state legislatures at the same time as those proposals that eventually became the Bill of Rights, the congressional

pay amendment had long been assumed to be dead.1 This provision

had its genesis, as did several others of the first amendments, in

the petitions of the states ratifying the Constitution.2 It was ratified, however, by only six states (of the eleven needed), and it was

rejected by five states. Aside from the idiosyncratic action of the

Ohio legislature in 1873, which ratified the proposal in protest of a

controversial pay increase adopted by Congress, the pay limitation

provision lay dormant until the 1980s. Then, an aide to a Texas

legislator discovered the proposal and began a crusade that culminated some ten years later in its ratification.3

Now that the provision is a part of the Constitution,4it will

likely play a minor role. What it commands was already statutorily

prescribed, and, at most, it may have implications for automatic costof-living increases in pay for Members of Congress.5

1 Indeed, in Dillon v. Gloss, 256 U.S. 368, 375 (1921), the Court, albeit in dictum, observed that, unless the inference was drawn that ratification must occur within

some reasonable time of proposal, “four amendments proposed long ago—two in 1789,

one in 1810 and one in 1861—are still pending and in a situation where their ratification in some of the States many years since by representatives of generations now

largely forgotten may be effectively supplemented in enough more States to make

three-fourths by representatives of the present or some future generation. To that

view few would be able to subscribe, and in our opinion it is quite untenable.” (Emphasis supplied).

2 A comprehensive, scholarly treatment of the background, development, failure, and subsequent success of this amendment is Bernstein, The Sleeper Wakes:

The History and Legacy of the Twenty-Seventh Amendment, 61 FORD. L. REV. 497 (1992).

A briefer account is The Congressional Pay Amendment, 16 Ops. of the Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Justice 102, App. at 127–136 (1992) (prelim. pr.).

3 The ratification issues are considered in the discussion of Article V, supra.

4 In the only case to date brought under the Amendment, the parties did not

raise the question of the validity of its ratification; the court refused to consider the

issue raised by an amicus. Boehner v. Anderson, 809 F.Supp. 138, 139 (D.D.C. 1992).

It is not at all clear the issue is justiciable.

5 See discussion of “Congressional Pay,” supra.

2291
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 10.81

     AGREEMENT made as of the 10th day of July, 1996, by and between Vitafort 
International Corporation, a Delaware corporation with its principal offices at 
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Los Angeles, California 90067 ("VFRT") and Second 
Nature Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal offices at 
591 Redwood Highway, Mill Valley, California 94941 ("SNT").

     WHEREAS, VFRT and SNT are parties to an agreement, dated October 5, 1993 
(the "1993 Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, VFRT and SNT desire to terminate the 1993 Agreement subject to the
terms and conditions hereof;

     NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
     
     1.  Subject to the terms and conditions hereof, the 1993 Agreement is 
terminated in all respects and the parties shall have no further claims or 
rights thereunder.

     2.  The parties each agree that, except as expressly provided herein, they 
shall each have no further obligations to the other party with respect to the 
1993 Agreement.

     3.  SNT shall, promptly upon the execution of this Agreement, deliver to 
VFRT all information under its control relating to the Vitafort Technology 
and/or the Vitafort Projects (as defined in the 1993 Agreement).

     4.  SNT shall make Barry Saltzman available to VFRT, or its 
representatives, on a reasonable basis to advise VFRT or its representative with
respect to the status of the Vitafort Technology and the Vitafort Projects. VFRT
acknowledges that it has been advised that Saltzman is employed on a full time 
basis as the Chief Executive Officer of SNT and has a fiduciary obligation to 
fulfill his duties thereunder. Accordingly, such advice may be given by 
telephone or by written report. Saltzman agrees to make himself available to 
give such advice as is required under this paragraph.

     5.  This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California
as they are applied to contracts to be performed entirely within such state.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day 
and year first above written.

                             Vitafort International Corporation
                             By: /s/ Sheldon Schrager
                                 --------------------------------
                                     Sheldon Schrager, Chairman of the Board

                             Second Nature Technologies, Inc.
                             By: /s/ Barry Saltzman
                                 --------------------------------
                                     Barry Saltzman, CEO
                                     (And individually as to paragraph 4)
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of China INSOnline Corp. (the “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the U.S.
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:  September
      29, 2008





/s/
                Mingfei YangName:
                Mingfei YangTitle:
                Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 02, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 02, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0393. WASEEM DAKER v. ROBERT L. RUSSELL, III.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2018NH12
EXHIBIT 23.1     Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statement (Form S-8, Nos. 333-60629 and 33-707145) of our report dated June 14, 2006, except for Note A, to which the date is September 30, 2006, with respect to the financial statements of Dexterity Surgical, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2004.    /s/   Akin, Doherty, Klein & Feuge, P.C.    Akin, Doherty, Klein & Feuge, P.C. San Antonio, Texas March 27, 2007
```

[United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions (Plum Book), 1996]
[Independent Agencies and Government Corporations]
[Consumer Product Safety Commission]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

The Plum Book (United States Government Policy
        and Supporting Positions): 1996 EditionBRANCH: EXECUTIVE CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSIONLocationPosition TitleName of IncumbentPay PlanType of Appt.Level Grade or PayTenureExpires**OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN**Bethesda, MDChairmanAnn W. BrownEXPASIII7 years10/27/2001Bethesda, MDExecutive AssistantPatricia H. AtkinsGSSC15..................Bethesda, MDSpecial AssistantBarbara B. RosenfeldGSSC15..................Bethesda, MDSpecial AssistantWalter A. SandersGSSC15..................**OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER GALL**Bethesda, MDCommissionerMary S. GallEXPASIV7 years10/26/1998Bethesda, MDSpecial Assistant (Legal)Dennis B. WilsonGSSC15..................Bethesda, MDSpecial AssistantPatricia SempleGSSC15..................Bethesda, MDStaff AssistantDeborah Y. SearlesGSSC11..................**OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER MOORE**Bethesda, MDCommissionerThomas H. MooreEXPASIV7 years10/26/2004Bethesda, MDSpecial Assistant(Legal)Michael GougishaGSSC15..................Bethesda, MDSpecial Assistant(Legal)Pamela L. WellerGSSC15..................Bethesda, MDStaff AssistantLinda K. TaylorGSSC11..................**OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER**Bethesda, MDCommissioner VacantEXPASIV..................Bethesda, MDCommissioner VacantEXPASIV..................**OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL**Bethesda, MDGeneral CounselEric A. RubelESNA............................**OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR**Bethesda, MDExecutive DirectorPamela GilbertESNA............................Bethesda, MDDeputy Executive Director/Field OperationsThomas W. MurrESCA............................Bethesda, MDDeputy Executive DirectorClarence T. BishopESTA....................12/31/1998**OFFICE OF HAZARD IDENTIFICATION 
              AND REDUCTION***Directorate for Engineering Sciences*Bethesda, MDAssociate Executive DirectorAndrew G. StadnikESCA............................*Directorate for Epidemiology and 
              Health Sciences*Bethesda, MDAssociate Executive DirectorMary A. DanelloESCA............................*Directorate for Laboratory Sciences*Bethesda, MDAssociate Executive DirectorAndrew G. UlsamerESCA............................**OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL RELATIONS**Bethesda, MDDirectorRobert J. WagerGSSC15..................**OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND PUBLIC 
              AFFAIRS**Bethesda, MDDirectorKathleen P. BegalaGSSC15..................
```
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Leobardo Moreno, Defendant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The People appeal from an order of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Bianka Perez, J.), dated February 1, 2018, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Bianka Perez, J.), dated February 1, 2018, reversed, on the law, motion denied, accusatory instrument reinstated and matter remitted to Criminal Court for further proceedings. </p><p>The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. Giving the misdemeanor information "a fair and not overly restrictive or technical reading" (<i>People v Casey</i>, 95 NY2d 354, 360 [2000]), we find "as a matter of common sense and reasonable pleading" (<a href="../2009/2009_04739.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Davis</i>, 13 NY3d 17</a>, 31 [2009]) that it was legally sufficient to charge defendant with "solicit[ing] ... another person to engage in sexual conduct with him in return for a fee" (Penal Law §§ 230.02[1][c], 230.04). The instrument recites that on May 19, 2017 at 10:38 p.m., on a specified street corner in Bronx County, defendant approached an undercover police officer and "asked to have sexual intercourse with [said officer] in exchange for a sum of United States currency," and defendant stated, in sum and substance, "I want everything for twenty dollars" (<i>see People v Ismailgeci</i>, 60 Misc 3d 129[A], 2018 NY Slip Op 50956[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2018], <i>lv denied </i>__ NY3d __ [2018], 2018 NY Slip Op 98405 [2018];<a href="../2016/2016_26247.htm" target="_blank"><i> People v Menner</i>, 53 Misc 3d 52</a>, 54-55 [2016], <i>lv denied </i>28 NY3d 1029 [2016]; <a href="../2017/2017_27417.htm" target="_blank"><i>cf. People v Drelich, </i>58 Misc 3d 81</a> [2017],<i> lv granted </i>31 NY3d 1013 [2018]). These allegations were sufficient for pleading purposes "since they provided adequate notice to enable defendant to prepare a defense and invoke his protection against double jeopardy" (<a href="../2014/2014_02103.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Kasse</i>, 22 NY3d 1142</a>, 1143 [2014]).  </p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: September 26, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>