T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T T I R AT H S I NG H, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72055 A ge nc yN o. A 098- 528- 306 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , P A E Z an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T i r a th S i ngh, na t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of Im m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls’ o rd erd ism issin g h is ap p ea l fro m an im m ig ra ti o n ju d g e’s deci si on denyi ng hi s app l i cat i on for a sy l um , w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and rel i ef un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture ( “ C A T ”) . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 

# FI LED APR23 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72055 2 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence. G on zalez -H erna ndezv. A s h c r o ft , 3 3 6 F .3 d9 9 5 , 9 9 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s f in d in g th a t, e v e n if

S in g h is c r e di bl e and w a s pe r s e c ut e d on a c c ountof apr ot e c t e d gr ound, the gove rnm e nt r e butt e d the pr e s um pt i on of aw e l l - f ounde d f e arof f utur e pe r s e c ut i on by e s tab lis h in g c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s in I n d ia . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 2 0 8 . 1 3 ( b ) ( 1 ) ( i ) ( A) a n d( ii) ; se e al

so G on zalez -H

erna ndez , 33 6 F . 3d at99 8-10 01 . T he agency r a tio n a llyc o n s tru e de v id e n c e in th e r e c o r da n dp r o v id e das u f f ic ie n tly in d iv idu a liz e da n a ly s is o f S in g h ’s f

u tu r e f e ar . Se e i d. at 1 0 0 0 . W e r ejec t S in g h ’s c o n te n tio n s th at th e B I A f a ile dto c o n s id e ra ll r e le v an t e v id e n c e . Se e L ar i taM ar t i nezv . I

N S, 2 2 0 F . 3 d1 0 9 2 , 1 0 9 5 -9 6 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 0 ) (p et i t i o n er m u st o v e r c o m e th e p r e s u m p tio n th a t th e a g e n c yh a s c o n s id e r e da ll th e e v id e n c e ) . A c c o r d in g ly , S in g h ’s a s y lu m c la im f a ils . B ec ause S i ng h fai l ed t o est abl i sh el i gi bi l i ty f or as ylum , he neces sari l y f ai l ed to m e e t th e m o r e s tr in g e n t s tan d a r df o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. See G o n za lezH erna ndez , 3 3 6 F .3 da t 1 0 0 1 , n .5 . F i nal l y, subst ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s deni alof C A T re l i ef b e c au s e S in g h f

a ile dto s h o w it is m o r e lik e lyth an n o t th at h e w ill b e to rtu r e din09- 72055 3 I n d ia . See Sow e v . Mukasey , 538 F . 3d 1281, 1288- 89 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( e vi de nc e of changed cou ntrycond i t i on s i n S i erraL eone defeat ed C A T cl ai m ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.