alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certificate of Principal Executive Officer

pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of CNET Networks, Inc.
(CNET Networks) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2006, 2006 (the Report), I, Neil M. Ashe, Chief Executive Officer of CNET Networks, Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CNET Networks.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: January 29, 2007



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Neil M. Ashe                    
|Neil M. Ashe                        
|Director and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CNET Networks and
will be retained by CNET Networks and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2605 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2605

   To specify that certain obligations of the United States shall be 
       prioritized in the event that the debt ceiling is reached.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2011

  Mr. Latham introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To specify that certain obligations of the United States shall be 
       prioritized in the event that the debt ceiling is reached.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Spending Priorities Act''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITY OF PAYMENTS IF THE DEBT CEILING IS REACHED.

    In the event that the debt of the United States Government, as 
defined in section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, reaches the 
statutory limit, amounts necessary for obligations incurred by the 
Government of the United States shall be made available to the 
following obligations before all other obligations:
            (1) Amounts necessary to carry out the authority of the 
        Department of the Treasury provided in section 3123 of title 
        31, United States Code, to pay with legal tender the principal 
        and interest on debt held by the public.
            (2) Such amounts as the Secretary of Defense (and the 
        Secretary of Homeland Security in the case of the Coast Guard) 
        determines to be necessary to continue to provide pay and 
        allowances (without interruption) to members of the Army, Navy, 
        Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, including reserve 
        components thereof, who perform active service.
            (3) Amounts necessary for the Commissioner of Social 
        Security to pay monthly old-age, survivors', and disability 
        insurance benefits under title II of the Social Security Act.
            (4) Amounts necessary for the Secretary of the Veterans 
        Affairs to pay compensation, as such term is defined under 
        section 101(13) of title 38, United States Code.
            (5) Such amounts as the President certifies to the Congress 
        are necessary to carry out vital national security priorities.
            (6) Amounts necessary to make payments under the Medicare 
        program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act.
            (7) Such amounts as the President certifies to the Congress 
        are necessary to carry out Government functions necessary for 
        protecting public health and public safety.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11.1

CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

BEGINNING BALANCE: 55,293,311

|DATE          | NO. OF SHARES ISSUED | CONTRIBUTION TO
WEIGHTED AVERAGE | ENDING BALANCE
|------------- | -------------------- | -------------------------------- | --------------
|Jan. 04, 2002 | 100,000              | 97,790                           | 55,391,101    
|Mar. 05, 2002 | 300,000              | 193,923                          | 55,585,024    
|Mar. 12, 2002 | 100,000              | 60,773                           | 55,645,797    
|Apr. 17, 2002 | 5,643,187            | 2,307,159                        | 57,952,956    



Net Loss for the period: $930,680

Weighted Average shares: 57,952,956

Net Loss per share: $(0.02)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7099

WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN O’NEIL; ASSISTANT WARDEN PETERSON;

MAJOR ALEO; LIEUTENANT KITZ; LIEUTENANT MEESE

(Female); GEORGE HOLDORF, Correctional Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROBERTS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MCCLOUD; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

FLEMING; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MASON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JAMES (Female), others to be

listed thru discovery,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA98-896-DKC)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William Allen Legg appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for copies of pleadings at Government expense. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Legg v. O’Neil, No. CA-98-896-DKC (D. Md. May 5,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UIH
AUSTRALIA/PACIFIC, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,859
<SECURITIES>                                     1,077
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,581
<PP&E>                                         245,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,459
<BONDS>                                        305,701
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (65,076)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,285
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,711
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,736
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (70,668)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (70,668)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (70,668)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (141,336)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
exv10w9






IMAX CORPORATION




EXHIBIT 10.9



AMENDING AGREEMENT


This Amendment to Services Agreement dated as of February 14, 2011 (the “Amending Agreement”) is
made between:



IMAX CORPORATION, a corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada (hereinafter referred to as
the “Company”),



and



BRAD WECHSLER (the “Executive”)



WHEREAS, the Company wishes to enter into this Amending Agreement to amend and extend the Services
Agreement dated as of December 11, 2008 (the “Agreement”).



NOWTHEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein
contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:



Section 1 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with the following:





	1.	 	Term. The term of the Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and run through the
earlier of (i) such date that Chairman is not re-elected to the Board, and (ii) April 1, 2013
(the “Term") provided, however, that the Board agrees to use its best efforts
to cause Chairman to be re-elected to the Board in 2013 provided the Agreement has been
renewed for an additional term, unless Chairman has engaged in activity that would have
constituted dismissal for Cause as that term is defined in the Employment Agreement.
	 
	2.	 	General. Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and unamended.
	 
	 	 	DATED as of February 14, 2011.





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

 	 
	 	/s/ Bradley J. Wechsler
 	 
	 	Bradley J. Wechsler 	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	IMAX CORPORATION

 	 
	 	Per  	/s/ Garth M. Girvan
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Garth M. Girvan 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Director
Order entered June 3, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00352-CV

PATRICIA TOLLESON, Appellant

V.

KAREN LISS LARA ARGUETA, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-04904-B

ORDER

The reporter’s record is past due. Although directed to provide, by May 13, 

2022, written verification that she has requested the reporter’s record and 

cautioned her that failure to do so may result in an order submitting the appeal 

without the reporter’s record, appellant has failed to comply. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the appeal be submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(c).

Appellant’s brief on the merits is due July 5, 2022.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Letterhead of:
Williams & Webster, P.S.
601 W. Riverside, Suite 1970
Spokane, WA 99201



To The Board of Directors of
Ramex Synfuels International, Inc.


We consent to the use of our audit report dated April 2, 1999 on the
financial  statements  of  Ramex Synfuels  International, Inc. as of
January 31, 1999  for filing with and attachment  to the  Form 10-K
report for  the year ended January 31, 1999.


/s/ Williams & Webster, P.S.

Spokane, WA 
April 26, 1999




























<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                             755
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,053
<INVENTORY>                                     23,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,610
<PP&E>                                           7,224
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,144
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,202
<BONDS>                                          6,612
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              945
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       (692)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,070
<SALES>                                        131,020
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,020
<CGS>                                          106,576
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,549
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   619
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (338)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,440)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    500
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,940)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.95)


</TABLE>
#### William Lloyd HILL, Appellant, v. A.L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellee.

No. 83-1397.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 10, 1984.

Decided Sept. 20, 1984.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, and HEA-NEY, BRIGHT, ROSS, McMILLIAN, ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, en banc.

ORDER

This case has been considered by the court en banc. The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided court.
#### Michael JACOBSON, Special Administrator of the Estate of Virginia A. Jacobson, Deceased, Appellant, v. Sherry K. SHRESTA, M.D.; Gaston Cornu-Labat, M.D., Appellees, Insurance Company 1; Insurance Company 2, Defendants, Midwest Medical Insurance Co.; Midwest Medical Insurance Holding Company, Appellees.

No. 07-2649.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 30, 2008.

Filed: July 2, 2008.

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Jacobson appeals the district court’s1 order denying reconsideration of the court’s Federal Rule of Civil Proee*485dure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his complaint. After carefully reviewing the record and Jacobson’s arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
exv10w1






EXHIBIT 10.1(s)(2)




Amendment No. 1




To the Sensient Technologies Corporation



Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan A

(Effective as of January 1, 2005)



     WHEREAS, Sensient Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Sensient Technologies
Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan A, effective as of January 1, 2005 (the “Plan”)
                                         for (the “Executive”);



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to increase the percentage applied in determining Executive’s
benefits under the Plan;



     NOW THEREFORE, Sections 3A; 3C 1, 2 and 3; and 12A 3 and 4 of the Plan are hereby amended,
effective as of                     , 20__, by deleting the figure of ___% and replacing it with ___%.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is duly executed this                      day of                     , 20__.




	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 





ATTEST:




	 	 	 

	 
	 	 
	 

	 	 





 









 






EXHIBIT 10.1(t)(2)




Amendment No. 1




To the Sensient Technologies Corporation



Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan B

(Effective as of January 1, 2005)



     WHEREAS, Sensient Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Sensient Technologies
Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan B, effective as of January 1, 2005 (the “Plan”)
for                                          (the “Executive”);



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to increase the percentage applied in determining Executive’s
benefits under the Plan;



     NOW THEREFORE, Sections 4A; 4C 1, 2, 3 and 4; and 13A 3 and 4 of the Plan are hereby amended,
effective as of                     , 20__, by deleting the figure of ___% and replacing it with ___%.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is duly executed this                      day of                     , 20__.



	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 





ATTEST:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2943 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2943

     To extend the program of block grants to States for temporary 
assistance for needy families and related programs through December 31, 
                                 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2011

Mr. Davis of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on 
the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the program of block grants to States for temporary 
assistance for needy families and related programs through December 31, 
                                 2011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Short-Term TANF Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES 
              PROGRAM AND RELATED PROGRAMS THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2011.

    (a) In General.--Activities authorized by part A of title IV and 
section 1108(b) of the Social Security Act (other than under 
subsections (a)(3) and (b) of section 403 of such Act) shall continue 
through December 31, 2011, in the manner authorized for fiscal year 
2011, and out of any money in the Treasury of the United States not 
otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appropriated such sums as may 
be necessary for such purpose. Grants and payments may be made pursuant 
to this authority on a quarterly basis through the first quarter of 
fiscal year 2012 at the level provided for such activities for the 
corresponding quarter of fiscal year 2011.
    (b) Maintenance of Effort.--Section 409(a)(7) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 609(a)(7)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or 2012'' and 
        inserting ``2012, or 2013''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking ``2011'' and 
        inserting ``2012''.

SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001015527
<NAME> GEOLOGISTICS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          13,555
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  274,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,965
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               307,748
<PP&E>                                          94,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,879
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 452,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          293,630
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,550
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                    (85,724)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   452,558
<SALES>                                        730,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               730,911
<CGS>                                          564,484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  564,484
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               179,231
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,373
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,274
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,087)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       686
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,773)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,330)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (11.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (11.93)


</TABLE>