alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 183 (Friday, September 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20255]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP17-1048-000.
    Applicants: Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Sales and Purchases of Gas for 
Operational Purposes to be effective 10/16/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20170914-5030.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/26/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-1049-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Annual Cash-Out Report Period 
Ending July 31, 2017.
    Filed Date: 9/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20170914-5049.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/26/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-1051-000.
    Applicants: Tallgrass Interstate Gas Transmission, L.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Administrative Updates to 
Tariff to be effective 10/15/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5106.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/27/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-1052-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Fuel Tracker--2017 November to 
be effective 11/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5127.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/27/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-1053-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Carolina Gas Transmission.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: DECG--2017 FRQ and TDA Report 
to be effective 11/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5133.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/27/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-884-001.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Correction to previously filed NRA 
to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5100.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/27/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: September 18, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-20255 Filed 9-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 295 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 31, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To amend the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act of 

1998 to authorize funds to acquire hydrographic data 

and provide hydrographic services specific to the Arctic 

for safe navigation, delineating the United States extended continental shelf, and the monitoring and description of coastal changes. 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 295 RFS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

4 Section 306 of the Hydrographic Services Improve5 ment Act of 1998 (33 U.S.C. 892d) is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting before the text the following: 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 section: 

10 ‘‘(b) ARCTIC PROGRAMS.—Of the amount authorized 

11 by this section for fiscal year 2012— 

12 ‘‘(1) $5,000,000 is authorized for use to ac13 quire hydrographic data, provide hydrographic serv14 ices, conduct coastal change analyses necessary to 

15 ensure safe navigation, and improve the manage16 ment of coastal change in the Arctic; and 

17 ‘‘(2) $2,000,000 is authorized for use to ac18 quire hydrographic data and provide hydrographic 

19 services in the Arctic necessary to delineate the 

20 United States extended Continental Shelf.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 24, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE:

9:30 a.m., Tuesday, October 17, 2017

# PLACE:

NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# STATUS:

The one item is open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

56985 Aviation Accident Report: Impact with Power Lines, Heart of Texas Hot Air Balloon Rides, Balóny Kubíček BB85Z, N2469L, Lockhart, Texas, July 30, 2016

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

*News Media Contact:*                         Telephone: (202) 314-6100.                    

The press and public may enter the NTSB Conference Center one hour prior to the meeting for set up and seating.

                        Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Rochelle McCallister at (202) 314-6305 or by email at                         *Rochelle.McCallister@ntsb.gov*                         by Wednesday, October 11, 2017.                    

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

                        Schedule updates, including weather-related cancellations, are also available at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Candi Bing at (202) 314-6403 or by email at                         *bingc@ntsb.gov.*

# FOR MEDIA INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Eric Weiss at (202) 314-6100 or by email at                         *eric.weiss@ntsb.gov.*

 Dated: Thursday, August 17, 2017.

Candi R. Bing,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-20504 Filed 9-21-17; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

#### Zwibel and Bestner Dental Assn. et al. v. Richard Cohick et al.

December 19, 1977

Case No. (Law) 4192

By JUDGE FRANKLIN P. BACKUS

The issue raised by the pleadings is should the Court now recognize extension of tort law to include a duty on attorneys and their clients not to bring negligence actions which they knew, or should have known, to be totally frivolous and with wrongful intent to harm.

The Court is of opinion that the long-time role of an attorney to be that of an independent advocate whose primary duty is to his own client should not be diminished by a rule that an adverse result in a malpractice suit can be the foundation of theories of negligence or strict liability in tort on the part of the losing attorney or his client.

The Court is also of opinion that such a rule would diminish a citizen’s basic right to seek redress in Court for what he considers to be a wrong.

The Court therefore concludes that Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Judgment does not allege facts upon which a cause of action can be founded and therefore the Demurrer should be and is sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  UIH
AUSTRALIA/PACIFIC,  INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE  MONTHS  ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,945
<PP&E>                                         300,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                 175,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,914
<BONDS>                                        368,816
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                    (293,132)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,846
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,432
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (14,922)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (47,535)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (47,535)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (47,535)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32










CERTIFICATION




By signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of River Valley Bancorp.




Signed this 16th day of November, 2009.







/s/ Matthew P. Forrester

/s/ Vickie L. GrimesMatthew P. Forrester

Vickie L. GrimesPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Vice President of Finance
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS• Appeal of

-- Better Built + Clark, LLC Under ContractNo. N40083-1O-C-0021 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60305

R. Edward Boucher, Esq.

Kotz Sangster Wysocki P.C. Detroit, MI Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney Timothy J. Cothrel, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Appellant appealed the decision ofthe contracting officer denying its claim for additional costs associated with electrical workrelated to construction ofan Armed Forces Reserve Center, Akron, Ohio. The parties agreed to a settlement, however, the settlement amount of$165,000 has not been paid. The partiesjointly request that the Board dismiss without prejudice pursuant to Board Rule 18(b) pending payment ofthe agreed upon settlement amount. Accordingly, the above-referenced appeal is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Unless eitherparty or the Board acts within 180 days from the date ofthis Order to reinstate this appeal, the dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. Dated: August 15, 2019

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60305, Appeal ofBetter Built+ Clark, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated: PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7741

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHARLES D. IZAC,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, 

Chief District Judge. (3:02-cr-00058-JPB-JSK-1)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles D. Izac, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles D. Izac appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his motion for review of his sentence. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Izac, No. 3:02-cr-00058-JPB-JSK-1 

(N.D.W. Va. Sept. 5, 2012). To the extent that Izac intends for 

his motion for review of his sentence to be considered by this 

court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(A), we deny the motion as 

untimely.*

 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

 * Although the appeal period in criminal cases is not 

jurisdictional, but rather a claim-processing rule, Bowles v. 

Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 209–14 (2007); United States v. Urutyan, 

564 F.3d 679, 685 (4th Cir. 2009), where, as here, review is 

sought more than five years after the entry of the judgment, we 

may exercise our inherent power to dismiss it. See United 

States v. Mitchell, 518 F.3d 740, 744, 750 (10th Cir. 2008).
Exhibit 21
                                   ----------

                           Subsidiaries of Registrant
                           --------------------------

                                                             Percent of Capital
                                                               Stock Owned At
         Name                          Location              December 31, 2003
------------------                   ------------            ------------------

Blackhawk State Bank               Beloit, Wisconsin                100%
(Wisconsin - chartered
Commercial Bank)

Blackhawk Statutory Trust I        Beloit, Wisconsin                100%

                      Subsidiaries of Blackhawk State Bank
                      ------------------------------------

                                                             Percent of Capital
                                                               Stock Owned At
         Name                          Location              December 31, 2003
------------------                   ------------            ------------------

Nevahawk Investment, Inc.          Las Vegas, Nevada                100%

RSL, Inc.                          Rochelle, Illinois               100%

First Financial Services, Inc.     Belvidere, Illinois              100%

                           Subsidiaries of RSL, Inc.
                           -------------------------

                                                             Percent of Capital
                                                               Stock Owned At
         Name                          Location              December 31, 2003
------------------                   ------------            ------------------

Midland Acceptance Corporation     Rochelle, Illinois               100%
II 

Calendar No. 3 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Received; read the first time 

JANUARY 26, 2011 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To repeal the job-killing health care law and health carerelated provisions in the Health Care and Education 

Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repealing the Job3 Killing Health Care Law Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE JOB-KILLING HEALTH CARE LAW 

5 AND HEALTH CARE-RELATED PROVISIONS IN 

6 THE HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION REC7 ONCILIATION ACT OF 2010. 

8 (a) JOB-KILLING HEALTH CARE LAW.—Effective as 

9 of the enactment of Public Law 111–148, such Act is re10 pealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by 

11 such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not 

12 been enacted. 

13 (b) HEALTH CARE-RELATED PROVISIONS IN THE

14 HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF

15 2010.—Effective as of the enactment of the Health Care 

16 and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 

17 111–152), title I and subtitle B of title II of such Act 

18 are repealed, and the provisions of law amended or re19 pealed by such title or subtitle, respectively, are restored 

20 or revived as if such title and subtitle had not been en21 acted. 

22 SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT. 

23 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

24 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

25 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

26 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2 PCS

1 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

2 by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the 

3 House of Representatives, as long as such statement has 

4 been submitted prior to the vote on passage of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 19, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 3 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2 

AN ACT 

To repeal the job-killing health care law and health 

Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. care-related provisions in the Health Care and 

JANUARY 26, 2011 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 96-40548 Summary Calendar

_______________________

REGINALD R. GOSS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF TEXAS,

Respondents-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(C-95-CV-556)

_________________________________________________________________ February 24, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Reginald R. Goss, Texas prisoner #684326, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for

failure to exhaust his s tate remedies. Goss is now required to

obtain a certificate of appealability (COA) in order to appeal the

district court’s order. We will not issue a COA, however, as Goss

has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a2

constitutional right. S ee 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see also

Drinkard v. Johnson

, 97 F.3d 751, 756 (5th Cir. 199 6). In the

alternative, if the district court was authorized to issue COA, we

conclude that because the state record indicates that Goss failed

to present his claim that the prosecution withheld exculpatory

evidence to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district court

did not err in dismissing Goss’ § 2254 petition for fai lure to

exhaust hi s state remedies. S ee Dispensa v. Lynaugh

. 847 F.2d

211, 217-18 (5th Cir. 1988).

For the forego ing reasons, COA is D ENIED ; and the

judgment is AFFIRMED

.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 298 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2915 

[Report No. 112–431] 

To repeal the Western Area Power Administration borrowing authority, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

APRIL 16, 2012 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2915 RH

A BILL 

To repeal the Western Area Power Administration borrowing 

authority, and for other purposes. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2915 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Taxpayer 

5 and Western Area Power Administration Customer Pro6 tection Act of 2011’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

8 Section 301 of the Hoover Power Plant Act of 1984 

9 is repealed. 

10 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

11 Section 2 shall be effective on September 15, 2011. 

12 SEC. 4. EFFECT OF REPEAL. 

13 The repeal under section 2 shall not apply to— 

14 (1) projects approved by the Secretary of En15 ergy or the Deputy Secretary of Energy through 

16 memorandum before the effective date in section 3; 

17 or 

18 (2) projects deemed ‘‘Projects in Execution’’ in 

19 the Western Area Power Administration May 17, 

20 2011, Quarterly Report on Borrowing Authority 

21 Projects. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 298 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2915 

[Report No. 112–431] 

A BILL 

To repeal the Western Area Power Administration 

borrowing authority, and for other purposes. 

APRIL 16, 2012 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS