44542 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2017 / Proposed Rules 

to support IFR operations for instrument 

approach procedures at the airport. 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers and be submitted in 

triplicate to the address listed above. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this notice must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2017–0721/Airspace 

Docket No. 17–AGL–15.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

All communications received before 

the specified closing date for comments 

will be considered before taking action 

on the proposed rule. The proposal 

contained in this notice may be changed 

in light of the comments received. A 

report summarizing each substantive 

public contact with FAA personnel 

concerned with this rulemaking will be 

filed in the docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s Web page at http:// 

www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/ 

airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see the 

ADDRESSES section for the address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except federal holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined during 

normal business hours at the Federal 

Aviation Administration, Air Traffic 

Organization, Central Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, 10101 

Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 

76177. 

Availability and Summary of 

Documents for Incorporation by 

Reference 

This document proposes to amend 

FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 3, 2017, and effective 

September 15, 2017. FAA Order 

7400.11B is publicly available as listed 

in the ADDRESSES section of this 

document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists 

Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, 

air traffic service routes, and reporting 

points. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) part 71 by modifying Class E 

airspace area extending upward from 

700 feet above the surface within a 6.4- 

mile radius (increased from a 6.3-mile 

radius) at Fitch H. Beach, Charlotte, MI, 

and updating the geographic 

coordinates of the airport to coincide 

with the FAA’s aeronautical database. 

The exclusionary language contained in 

the airspace description is being 

removed to comply with FAA Order 

7400.2L, Procedures for Handling 

Airspace Matters. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order 7400.11B, dated August 3, 2017, 

and effective September 15, 2017, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current, is noncontroversial and unlikely to result in 

adverse or negative comments. It, 

therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a regulatory evaluation as 

the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this 

proposed rule, when promulgated, 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities under the criteria of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1F, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the Federal 

Aviation Administration proposes to 

amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 3, 2017, and 

effective September 15, 2017, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

AGL MI E5 Charlotte, MI [Amended] 

Charlotte, Fitch H. Beach Airport, MI 

(Lat. 42°34′27′′ N., long. 84°48′44′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of the Fitch H. Beach Airport. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on September 

13, 2017. 

Walter Tweedy, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

ATO Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2017–20329 Filed 9–22–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 573 

[Docket No. FDA–2017–F–5528] 

Idemitsu Kosan, Cp. Ltd.; Filing of 

Food Additive Petition (Animal Use) 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Notification; petition for 

rulemaking. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2017 / Proposed Rules 44543 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA or we) is 

announcing that Idemitsu Kosan, Cp. 

Ltd. has filed a petition proposing that 

the food additive regulations be 

amended to provide for the safe use of 

silicon dioxide as a carrier for flavors for 

use in animal feed. 

DATES: The food additive petition was 

filed on August 7, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: For access to the docket, go 

to https://www.regulations.gov and 

insert the docket number, found in 

brackets in the heading of this 

document, into the ‘‘Search’’ box and 

follow the prompts; and/or go to the 

Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers 

Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Chelsea Trull, Center for Veterinary 

Medicine, Food and Drug 

Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., 

Rockville, MD 20855, 240–402–6729, 

chelsea.trull@fda.hhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the 

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 

(section 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), 

notice is given that a food additive 

petition (FAP 2304) has been filed by 

Idemitsu Kosan, Cp. Ltd., Agri-Bio 

Business Dept., 1–1 Marunouchi 3- 

Chome, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo 1000–8321, 

Japan. The petition proposes to amend 

Title 21 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) in part 573 (21 CFR 

part 573) Food Additives Permitted in 

Feed and Drinking Water of Animals to 

provide for the safe use of silicon 

dioxide (21 CFR 573.940) as a carrier for 

flavors for use in animal feed. 

The petitioner has claimed that this 

action is categorically excluded under 

21 CFR 25.32(r) because it is of a type 

that does not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. In addition, 

the petitioner has stated that, to their 

knowledge, no extraordinary 

circumstances exist. If FDA determines 

a categorical exclusion applies, neither 

an environmental assessment nor an 

environmental impact statement is 

required. If FDA determines a 

categorical exclusion does not apply, we 

will request an environmental 

assessment and make it available for 

public inspection. 

Dated: September 19, 2017. 

Anna K. Abram, 

Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning, 

Legislation, and Analysis. 

[FR Doc. 2017–20385 Filed 9–22–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4164–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Parts 1, 5f, and 46 

[REG–125374–16] 

RIN 1545–BN60 

Guidance on the Definition of 

Registered Form 

Correction 

In proposed rule document 2017– 

19753, appearing on pages 43720 

through 43730, in the issue of Tuesday, 

September 19, 2017, make the following 

correction: 

On page 43725, in the second column, 

at the bottom of the column, under the 

heading ‘‘Partial Withdrawal of Notice 

of Proposed Rulemaking,’’ on the 

second line of the paragraph, ‘‘5f.163– 

1(b)(2)’’ should read ‘‘§ 5f.163–1(b)(2)’’. 

[FR Doc. C1–2017–19753 Filed 9–22–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1301–00–D 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2009–0226; FRL–9968–16– 

Region 4] 

Air Plan Approval; GA: Emission 

Reduction Credits 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

changes to the Georgia State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) to update the 

emission reduction credits regulation. 

EPA is proposing to approve portions of 

the SIP revision submitted by the State 

of Georgia, through the Georgia 

Department of Natural Resources’ 

Environmental Protection Division on 

September 15, 2008. This action is being 

taken pursuant to the Clean Air Act. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before October 25, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2009–0226 at http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 

EPA may publish any comment received 

to its public docket. Do not submit 

electronically any information you 

consider to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Multimedia submissions (audio, video, 

etc.) must be accompanied by a written 

comment. The written comment is 

considered the official comment and 

should include discussion of all points 

you wish to make. EPA will generally 

not consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Lakeman, Air Regulatory 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. 

Lakeman can be reached via telephone 

at (404) 562–9043 or via electronic mail 

at lakeman.sean@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Final Rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

implementation plan revision as a direct 

final rule without prior proposal 

because the Agency views this as a 

noncontroversial submittal and 

anticipates no adverse comments. A 

detailed rationale for the approval is set 

forth in the direct final rule. If no 

adverse comments are received in 

response to this rule, no further activity 

is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse 

comments, the direct final rule will be 

withdrawn and all public comments 

received will be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period on this 

document. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this document should 

do so at this time. 

Dated: September 13, 2017. 

Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III, 

Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2017–20337 Filed 9–22–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS