FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT N ove m be r 16, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 11452 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 1 - 0 0 0 7 6 - CR- 4 - SPM U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s R O B E R T O J . M O N T E L O N G O , a .k .a . R o b e rto J u a r e z , a .k .a . R o b e rto M o n te lo n g o J u a r e z , a .k .a . J u a n I s m a e l J u a r e s , a .k .a . B e tto J u a r e z , a .k .a . J u a n I s m a e l J u a r e z , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe N orthe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( N ove m b e r 16, 2006)2

B efo re A N D E R S O N , B A R K E T T an dP R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: R ob ert o J. M on t el on go appeal s hi s s ent ence of 50 m on ths for i l l egal re entry i nt o the U ni t e d S t a t e s . M ont e l ongo a r gue s tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtvi ol a t e d s e c t i on 35 53 (a ) bec ause i tfa i l ed bo th t o st at e and fi ndthatM on t el on go ’ s s ent ence w as

“ notgr e a t e rtha n ne c e s s a ry . ” 18 U . S . C . § 3553( a ) . T he a dvi s oryS e nt e nc i ng G ui de l i ne s r a nge w a s 46 t o 57 m onths of i m pr i s onm e nt , a nd M ont e l ongo di d not o b j e c ta ts e n t e n c i n g . W e a f f i rm.

“ Wh e n ad e f

e n d a n tf a i l s t o o b j e c tt o a n e rr o rb e f

o r e th e d i s tr i c tc o u rt , we r e vi e w the a r gum e ntf

orpl a i n e rr or . ” U ni t e d S t a t e s v. R a a d, 406 F . 3d 1322, 1323 (11th C i r. ), ce rt . deni ed __U . S . __ , 12 6 S . C t . 19 6 (20 05 ). P l ai n err or occurs w he r e “ ‘ ( 1) the r e i s a n e rr or ; ( 2) tha ti s pl a i n orobvi ous ; ( 3) a f f e c t i ng the de f e nda nt ' s s ubs t a nt i a l r i ght s i n tha ti tw a s pr e j udi c i a l a nd notha rm l e s s ; a nd ( 4) thatse ri ou sl y a ff

ec t s the fa i rnes s, i nt egri ty, or pu bl i c r eput at i on of the j ud i ci al proceedi ng s. ’ ” I d. (quo t i ng U ni t ed S t at es v. H al l , 31 4 F . 3d 56 5, 56 6 (11 th C i r. 20 02 )) . T he di stri ctcourtdi d n oterr.

“ [N ] othi ng . . . re qu i re s [ a] di stri ctcourtt o st at e on the re cord thati thas e xpl i c i t l yc ons i de r e d e a c h of the [ s e c t i on] 3553( a ) f

a c t or s ort o di s c us s e a c h of the [s ec t i on ] 35 53 (a ) f

ac t ors. ” U ni t ed S t at es v. S cott , 42 6 F . 3d 13 24 , 13 29 (11th C i r.3

2005) . I n a ddi t i on, w e r e vi e w the s e nt e nc e i m pos e d bythe di s tr i c tc ourtf or r e a s o n ab le n e s s a n d“o r d in a r ily. . . e x p e c t as e n te n c e w ith in th e G u id e lin e s r a n g e to b e r e a s o n ab le .” U n ite dS ta te s v . T a lle y , 4 3 1 F .3 d7 8 4 , 7 8 8 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . B e c au s e M o n te lo n g o ’s s e n te n c e “a c h ie v e [ s ] th e p u rp o s e s o f s e n te n c in g a s s ta te din [ s e c t i on] 3553( a ) , ” i tw a s r e a s onabl e . I d. AF F I RME D.