alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2706 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the sale of billfish. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2706 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Billfish Conservation 

3 Act of 2012’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) The United States carefully regulates its 

7 domestic fisheries for billfish and participates in 

8 international fishery management bodies in the At9 lantic and Pacific. 

10 (2) Global billfish populations have declined sig11 nificantly, however, because of overfishing primarily 

12 through retention of bycatch by non-United States 

13 commercial fishing fleets. 

14 (3) Ending the importation of foreign-caught 

15 billfish for sale in the United States aligns with U.S. 

16 management measures of billfish and protects the 

17 significant economic benefits to the U.S. economy of 

18 recreational fishing and marine commerce and the 

19 traditional cultural fisheries. 

20 SEC. 3. STATEMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. 

21 The Congress enacts this Act pursuant to clause 3 

22 of section 8 of article I of the Constitution. 

23 SEC. 4. PROHIBITION ON SALE OF BILLFISH. 

24 (a) PROHIBITION.—No person shall offer for sale, 

25 sell, or have custody, control, or possession of for purposes 
3 

•HR 2706 EH

1 of offering for sale or selling billfish or products con2 taining billfish. 

3 (b) PENALTY.—For purposes of section 308(a) of the 

4 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Manage5 ment Act (16 U.S.C. 1858(a)), a violation of this section 

6 shall be treated as an act prohibited by section 307 of 

7 that Act (16 U.S.C. 1857). 

8 (c) EXEMPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL FISHERIES AND

9 MARKETS.— 

10 (1) Subsection (a) does not apply to billfish 

11 caught by US fishing vessels and landed in the State 

12 of Hawaii or Pacific Insular Areas as defined in sec13 tion 3(35) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Con14 servation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 

15 1802(35)). 

16 (2) Subsection (a) does not apply to billfish 

17 landed by foreign fishing vessels in the Pacific Insu18 lar Areas when the foreign caught billfish is ex19 ported to non-US markets or retained within Hawaii 

20 and the Pacific Insular Areas for local consumption. 

21 (d) BILLFISH DEFINED.—In this section the term 

22 ‘‘billfish’’— 

23 (1) means any fish of the species— 

24 (A) Makaira nigricans (blue marlin); 

25 (B) Kajikia audax (striped marlin); 
4 

•HR 2706 EH

1 (C) Istiompax indica (black marlin); 

2 (D) Istiophorus platypterus (sailfish); 

3 (E) Tetrapturus angustirostris (shortbill 

4 spearfish); 

5 (F) Kajikia albida (white marlin); 

6 (G) Tetrapturus georgii (roundscale spear7 fish); 

8 (H) Tetrapturus belone (Mediterranean 

9 spearfish); and 

10 (I) Tetrapturus pfluegeri (longbill spear11 fish); and 

12 (2) does not include the species Xiphias gladius 

13 (swordfish). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2706 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the sale of billfish.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2016

p0518

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2016

152758

COVENANT MEDICAL CENTER, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152758

COA: 322108

Saginaw CC: 13-020416-NF

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 22, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether a healthcare provider has an 

independent or derivative claim against a no-fault insurer for no-fault benefits; (2) 

whether a healthcare provider constitutes “some other person” within the meaning of the 

second sentence of MCL 500.3112; and (3) the extent to which a hearing is required by 

MCL 500.3112.

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this 

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
#### S. H. RALEIGH, Plaintiff, v. DIXIE OHIO EXPRESS, a corporation, Defendant.

*No. 632.*

United States District Court E. D. Kentucky. Pikeville Division.

Dec. 13, 1960.

J. A. Runyon, Pikeville, Ky., for plaintiff.

Stoll, Keenon & Park, by C. Gibson Downing, Lexington, Ky., for defendant.

SWINFORD, District Judge.

The record is before the court on the defendant’s motion to quash the return on the summons and motion to dismiss for improper venue.

The complaint alleges that the defendant, through its agents, servants and employees, negligently and carelessly operated a truck belonging to the defendant in such a manner as to cause the automobile in which the plaintiff was riding to collide with the truck with such force and violence as to cause him to suffer severe and permanent injuries which resulted in physical pain, loss of power to earn money, and hospital and medical expenses.

It is alleged that the accident occurred on October 23, 1959, near Dayton, Tennessee. No personal service was had upon the defendant in this district. It is sought to be brought before the court by the provisions of the Nonresident Motorists, Service of Process Act, Chapter 188 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes.

The statute provides for constructive service against a motorist who accepts the privilege extended by the laws of this state to nonresidents to operate mo*625tor vehicles or have them operated within this state. It provides that they shall thereby have accepted the terms of the local law which makes the Secretary of State their agent or personal representative for the service of process in any civil action instituted in the courts of this state arising out of any accident or collision within *this*state in which the motor vehicle is involved. Obviously, to undertake to. extend this right of constructive service on the basis of the allegations of the complaint would be beyond the purpose of the statute. KRS 188.-020; 188.030.

 Since the automobile collision complained of occurred in Tennessee, and not on a highway in Kentucky, it is clear that the defendant cannot be brought before a court in this state by substituted or constructive process, and is, consequently, not properly before the court. Substituted service is dependent upon statutory authorization and there must be strict compliance with the statutes in order to effect a valid service. Odley v. Wilson, 309 Ky. 507,218 S.W.2d 17.

The motion to quash the return on the summons should be sustained.

In considering the motion to dismiss, the record reveals that this is a case of a civil nature, the amount in controversy exceeds ten thousand dollars, and the parties are of diverse citizenship. The allegations meet the requirements of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332(a) (1), as amended, and the jurisdiction of this court is properly invoked. The plaintiff alleges that he is a citizen and resident of this judicial district. The requirements of the venue statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(a), are therefore properly met. Olberding v. Illinois Central R. Co., 346 U.S. 338, 74 S. Ct. 83, 98 L.Ed. 39.

The motion to dismiss should be overruled.

An order in conformity with this memorandum is this day entered.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.





I, Malcolm M. Aslin, Chief Executive Officer of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc., hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), that:





(a)  The Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(b)  The information contained in the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, which accompanies this certification, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.





Date: November 13, 2003By:
/s/ Malcolm M. AslinMalcolm M. AslinPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2775 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2775

To repeal a limitation in the Labor-Management Relations Act regarding 
   requirements for labor organization membership as a condition of 
                              employment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2011

  Mr. Sherman (for himself, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Stark, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. 
Jackson of Illinois, Ms. Norton, Mr. Rangel, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Brady 
 of Pennsylvania, Mr. Michaud, Ms. Sutton, and Ms. Kaptur) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                           and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal a limitation in the Labor-Management Relations Act regarding 
   requirements for labor organization membership as a condition of 
                              employment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    Section 14 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 164) is 
amended by striking subsection (b) and redesignating subsection (c) as 
subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11.1

 

**CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE**

 

 
| BEGINNING BALANCE |          | 23,053,689       |
|-------------------|---------------|------------------|
|              |          |             |   |
|              | NO. OF SHARES | CONTRIBUTION TO  | ENDING |
| DATE              | ISSUED        | WEIGHTED AVERAGE | BALANCE |
|              |          |             |   |
| January 23, 2006  | 1,008,548     |             | 923,579 |   | 23,977,268 |   |
| February 2, 2006  | 125,000       |             | 110,348 |   | 24,087,616 |   |
| May 10, 2006      | 120,864       |             | 63,310 |   | 24,150,926 |   |
| June 7, 2006      | 275,000       |             | 115,842 |   | 24,266,768 |   |
| August 30, 2006   | 1,549,332     |             | 175,931 |   | 24,442,699 |   |

 

 
| Loss for the period     | $2,612,471 |
|-------------------------|------------|
| Weighted average shares | 24,442,699 |
| Net Loss per share      | $(0.11)    |
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131944 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131944 

 COA: 261406 

Wayne CC: 04-007180

LESLIE LEE EDWARDS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,175)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,822
<PP&E>                                          47,903
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,321
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           257
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,500
<SALES>                                         79,915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,915
<CGS>                                           99,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,206
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       247
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,187) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                     479
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (12,708)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,708)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.50)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                                Certification of
                           Chief Financial Officer of
                           Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.

     I, Rick J.  Tremblay,  Chief  Financial  Officer of Gold Banc  Corporation,
Inc., hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.ss.  1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a)  The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
          30, 2004, which  accompanies this  certification,  fully complies with
          the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
          Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (b)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
          quarterly  period  ended  June  30,  2004,   which   accompanies  this
          certification,   fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,   the
          financial   condition   and  results  of   operations   of  Gold  Banc
          Corporation, Inc.



Dated:  August 9, 2004

                               By:  /s/ RICK J. TREMBLAY
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                   Rick J. Tremblay
                                   Chief Financial Officer
1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-2531

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Oscar Santoscoy-Martinez, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 15, 2004 Filed: January 21, 2004

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Oscar Santoscoy-Martinez pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States after deportation following a conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court 1 sentenced him to 46 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, Mr. Santoscoy-Martinez’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that (1) the district court erred in enhancing Mr. Santoscoy--2- Martinez’s sentence based on a Texas burglary conviction, because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that case; and (2) the court should have granted a downward departure based on Mr. Santoscoy-Martinez’s overrepresented criminal history. After careful review, we reject these arguments. Mr. Santoscoy-Martinez cannot, in these proceedings, collaterally attack his prior state sentence based on ineffective assistance of counsel, see United States v. Jones , 28 F.3d 69, 70 (8th Cir. 1994) (per curiam); and the departure argument is unreviewable, because there is no indication the district court believed it lacked authority to depart, seeUnited States v. Moore , 245 F.3d 1023, 1026 (8th Cir. 2001). Finally, we have reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARCIA TURPIN, MICHELLE TURPIN and FREDERICK DAULEY
, Appellant s ,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1896

[ June 24, 2021 ]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Andrea Gundersen , Judge; L.T. Case

No. 17

- 013514 CACE (11)

.

Larry R. Fleurantin of Fleurantin, Francois & Antonin, P.A., North Miami Beach, for appellant s

.

Ralph W. Confreda, Jr. and William Grimsley of McGlinchey Stafford, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, C.J., G ROSS and C IKLIN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2891 

To delay implementation of the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule of the 

Environmental Protection Agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 

Mr. FINCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To delay implementation of the Cross-State Air Pollution 

Rule of the Environmental Protection Agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘America’s Energy 

5 Independence Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DELAY IN IMPLEMENTATION OF CROSS-STATE AIR 

7 POLLUTION RULE. 

8 (a) DELAY.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 

9 law, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

10 Agency shall not implement the final rule entitled ‘‘FedVerDate Mar 15 2010 19:28 Sep 14, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2891.IH H2891

emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2891 IH

1 eral Implementation Plans: Interstate Transport of Fine 

2 Particulate Matter and Ozone and Correction of SIP Ap3 provals’’ (76 Fed Reg. 48208 (August 8, 2011); commonly 

4 referred to as the ‘‘Cross-State Air Pollution Rule’’) or 

5 any successor or substantially similar rule (other than the 

6 rules described in subsection (b)) before the end of cal7 endar year 2021. 

8 (b) APPLICABILITY OF CLEAN AIR INTERSTATE

9 RULE IN INTERIM.—Notwithstanding any other provision 

10 of law, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

11 Agency shall— 

12 (1) continue to implement the Clean Air Inter13 state Rule and the rule establishing Federal Imple14 mentation Plans for the Clean Air Interstate Rule as 

15 promulgated and modified by the Administrator of 

16 the Environmental Protection Agency (70 Fed. Reg. 

17 25162 (May 12, 2005), 71 Fed. Reg. 25288 (April 

18 28, 2006), 71 Fed. Reg. 25328 (April 28, 2006), 72 

19 Fed. Reg. 59190 (Oct. 19, 2007), 72 Fed. Reg. 

20 62338 (Nov. 2, 2007), 74 Fed. Reg. 56721 (Nov. 3, 

21 2009)) through the end of calendar year 2021; and 

22 (2) not promulgate any modification to any rule 

23 described in paragraph (1). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000857613
<NAME> NORTH OAKS PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,721,397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  443,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    176,664
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,074,928
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,132,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,884,820
<BONDS>                                     13,040,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,132,512
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,643,026
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,548,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (1,562,491)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (294,540)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (294,540)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>