alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.23 (CONTRACT)




---



##### 



SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE SUMMARY OF CHANGES SECTION B  SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES SUBCLIN 000205 is added as follows: ITEM NO
    
    SUPPLIES/SERVICES
    
    QUANTITY
    
    UNIT
    
    
    UNIT PRICE
    
    
    AMOUNT000205
    
    
    
    
    
    LotINCREMENTAL FUNDINGCPFFINCREMENTAL FUNDING FOR CLIN 0002PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: W71B7J-5031-H342ROBERT REAMS, 301-394-3135ESTIMATED COST
    
    $
    0.00FIXED FEE
    
    $
    0.00TOTAL EST COST + FEE
    
    $
    0.00ACRN AN Funded Amount
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    3,508,000.00
 FOB: Destination SECTION E  INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE The following Acceptance/Inspection Schedule was added for SUBCLIN 000205: INSPECT AT
    
    INSPECT BY
    
    ACCEPT AT
    
    ACCEPT BYDestination
    
    Government
    
    Destination
    
    Government
 The following Technical Office was added for SUBCLIN 000205:
US ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY
ROBERT REAMS
2800 POWDER MILL ROAD
ADELPHI MD 20783-1197 SECTION F  DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0002 has been changed from: DELIVERY DATE
    
    QUANTITY
    
    SHIP TO ADDRESS
    
    UICPOP 20-SEP-2002 TO
    
    N/A
    
    US ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY
    
    W71B7J30-OCT-2004
    
    
    
    ROBERT REAMS2800 POWDER MILL ROADADELPHI MD 20783-1197301-394-3135FOB: Destination
 To:




---



##### 



DELIVERY DATE
    
    QUANTITY
    
    SHIP TO ADDRESS
    
    UICPOP 30-OCT-2004 TO
    
    N/A
    
    US ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY
    
    W71B7J01-OCT-2006
    
    
    
    ROBERT REAMS2800 POWDER MILL ROADADELPHI MD 20783-1197301-394-3135FOB: Destination
 The following Delivery Schedule item has been added to SUBCLIN 000205: DELIVERY DATE
    
    QUANTITY
    
    SHIP TO ADDRESS
    
    UIC01-OCT-2006
    
    
    
    US ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY
    
    W71B7JROBERT REAMS2800 POWDER MILL ROADADELPHI MD 20783-1197301-394-3135FOB: Destination
 SECTION G  CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA Accounting and Appropriation Summary for the Payment Office As a result of this modification, the total funded amount for this document was increased by
$3,508,000.00 from $20,258,620.74 to $23,766,620.74. SUBCLIN 000205:
Funding on SUBCLIN 000205 is initiated as follows: ACRN: AN Acctng Data: 974040013010RPARGO4H20D281000255YANRE00W71B7J5031H3424N9EKKS18129 Increase: $3,508,000.00 Total: $3,508,000.00 (End of Summary of Changes)
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CALIPER LIFE SCIENCES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter F. McAree,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify,pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

 

(1)                         The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

(2)                         The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|                      | /s/ PETER F. MCAREE                                |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                               |
|                      | Peter F. McAree                                    |
|                      | Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|                      | (Principal Financial  Officer)                     |
|                      |                                               |
|                      |                                               |
| Date: August 6, 2010 |                                               |

 

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2831 

To amend Public Law 89–732 to modify the requirement for a Cuban national 

to qualify for and maintain status as a permanent resident. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 30, 2011 

Mr. RIVERA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 89–732 to modify the requirement 

for a Cuban national to qualify for and maintain status 

as a permanent resident. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF RULES REGARDING ADJUST4 MENT OF STATUS FOR CUBAN REFUGEES. 

5 Section 1 of Public Law 89–732 is amended by add6 ing at the end the following: ‘‘An alien shall be ineligible 

7 for adjustment of status under this section if the alien 

8 returns to Cuba after admission or parole into the United 

9 States. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall rescind 

10 the status of an alien who obtained adjustment of status 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2831 IH

1 under this section if the alien returns to Cuba before being 

2 admitted to citizenship in accordance with title III of the 

3 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.), 

4 and the alien shall thereafter be subject to all the provi5 sions of such Act to the same extent as if the adjustment 

6 of status had not been made.’’. 

Æ 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 20-F of Luxottica Group S.p.A. (the “Company”) forthe fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrea Guerra, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |   | By:    | /s/ Andrea Guerra       |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |   | Andrea Guerra           |
|   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

Dated:  June 29,2005

 

This written statementaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


DYNAMEX INC.
CALCULATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
(in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)




<Table>
<Caption>
                                          Three months ended         Six months ended
                                             January 31,               January 31,
                                        ----------------------     ---------------------
                                          2002          2001         2002         2001
                                        --------      --------     --------     --------
<S>                                     <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
Net income (loss)                       $   (450)     $     59     $    457     $    557
                                        ========      ========     ========     ========

Weighted average common
   shares outstanding                     10,363        10,207       10,285       10,207

Common share equivalents related
   to options and warrants                    --            --           35           --
                                        --------      --------     --------     --------

Common shares and common share
   equivalents                            10,363        10,207       10,320       10,207
                                        ========      ========     ========     ========

Common stock price used under
   treasury stock method                $   2.11      $   1.44     $   2.04     $   1.44
                                        ========      ========     ========     ========

Net income (loss) per common share:
   Basic                                $  (0.04)     $   0.01     $   0.04     $   0.05
                                        ========      ========     ========     ========

   Diluted                              $  (0.04)     $   0.01     $   0.04     $   0.05
                                        ========      ========     ========     ========
</Table>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1


                            EARTHLINK NETWORK, INC.

                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED                NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                          -----------------------------   ----------------------------
                                                          SEPTEMBER 30,   SEPTEMBER 30,   SEPTEMBER 30,   SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                              1996            1997            1996            1997
                                                          -------------   -------------   -------------   -------------
<S>                                                       <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Net loss...............................................    $ (10,105)       $ (7,198)      $ (21,809)      $ (23,327)
                                                           ---------        --------       ---------       ---------

Weighted average shares outstanding pursuant to 
 SAB 83................................................        6,237                           5,658

Weighted average shares outstanding pursuant to 
 APB 15................................................                        9,932                           9,593

  Purchase of shares of Common Stock below the 
   expected IPO price during fiscal 1996...............          171                             312

  Assumed exchange of warrants for Common Stock........          235             -               235             -

  Assumed exchange of options for Common Stock.........          363             -               363             -
                                                           ---------        --------       ---------       ---------

Weighted average shares outstanding....................        7,006           9,932           6,568           9,593
                                                           ---------        --------       ---------       ---------
                                                           ---------        --------       ---------       ---------

Net loss per share.....................................    $   (1.44)       $  (0.72)      $   (3.32)      $   (2.43)
                                                           ---------        --------       ---------       ---------
                                                           ---------        --------       ---------       ---------
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7032

STANLEY G. BRIMM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-99-1028)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 29, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley G. Brimm, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

July 19, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on July 20, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58

and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date

that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Stanley G. Brimm seeks to appeal the district court’s order

declining to reconsider the order refusing to alter or amend judgment denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Brimm v. Angelone, No.

CA-99-1028 (E.D. Va. July 20, 2000).* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 290 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 290

    To amend title 36, United States Code, to ensure that memorials 
commemorating the service of the United States Armed Forces may contain 
               religious symbols, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2011

  Mr. Hunter (for himself, Mr. Bilbray, and Mr. Issa) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 36, United States Code, to ensure that memorials 
commemorating the service of the United States Armed Forces may contain 
               religious symbols, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``War Memorial Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS AS PART OF MILITARY MEMORIALS.

    (a) Authority.--Chapter 21 of title 36, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 2115. Inclusion of religious symbols as part of military 
              memorials
    ``(a) Inclusion of Religious Symbols Authorized.--To recognize the 
religious background of members of the United States Armed Forces, 
religious symbols may be included as part of--
            ``(1) a military memorial that is established or acquired 
        by the United States Government; or
            ``(2) a military memorial that is not established by the 
        United States Government, but for which the American Battle 
        Monuments Commission cooperated in the establishment of the 
        memorial.
    ``(b) Military Memorial Defined.--In this section, the term 
`military memorial' means a memorial or monument commemorating the 
service of the United States Armed Forces. The term includes works of 
architecture and art described in section 2105(b) of this title.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following:

``2115. Inclusion of religious symbols as part of military 
                            memorials.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes
      - Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of PLM Equipment Growth Fund V (the
“Partnership”), on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner and of
      the
      Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)  the
      Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.














/s/
      Richard K Brock


Richard
      K
      Brock


Chief
      Financial Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.


(Principal
      Financial Officer)


June
      6,
      2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

LENNE LARUE, III, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 515 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED. 

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
993

1 18 U.S. (5 Wheat.) 420, 422-423 (1820). 

RATIFICATION

ARTICLE VII 

The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be 

sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between 

the States so ratifying the Same. 

IN GENERAL 

In Owings v. Speed 1 the question at issue was whether the 

Constitution of the United States operated upon an act of Virginia 

passed in 1788. The Court held it did not, stating in part: 

‘‘The Conventions of nine States having adopted the Constitution, Congress, in September or October, 1788, passed a resolution 

in conformity with the opinions expressed by the Convention, and 

appointed the first Wednesday in March of the ensuing year as the 

day, and the then seat of Congress as the place, ‘for commencing 

proceedings under the Constitution.’’’ 

‘‘Both Governments could not be understood to exist at the 

same time. The New Government did not commence until the old 

Government expired. It is apparent that the Government did not 

commence on the Constitution being ratified by the ninth State; for 

these ratifications were to be reported to Congress, whose continuing existence was recognized by the Convention, and who were 

requested to continue to exercise their powers for the purpose of 

bringing the new Government into operation. In fact, Congress did 

continue to act as a Government until it dissolved on the 1st of November, by the successive disappearance of its Members. It existed 

potentially until the 2d of March, the day proceeding that on which 

the Members of the new Congress were directed to assemble.’’ 

‘‘The resolution of the Convention might originally have suggested a doubt, whether the Government could be in operation for 

every purpose before the choice of a President; but this doubt has 

been long solved, and were it otherwise, its discussion would be 

useless, since it is apparent that its operation did not commence 

before the first Wednesday in March 1789 ... .’’
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20416]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): September 
25, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 20, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 360 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017-206, CP2017-314.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-20416 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 99.2
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of PLM Equipment Growth Fund V (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner and of the Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Richard K Brock
 Richard K Brock
 Chief Financial Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 March 29, 2004