alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 





FirsT
Amendment to DIRECTOR Agreement


  


This
First Amendment to DIRECTOR Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of April 12, 2018 by and among Meridian
Waste Solutions, Inc., a New York corporation (the “Company”) and ___________________ (the “Director”).
The Company and the Director are also each hereinafter referred to individually as a “Party” and together as the “Parties”.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Director
serves as a member of the board of directors (the “Board”) of the Company pursant to that certain Director Agreement,
dated as of November 1, 2016, between the Parties (the “Original Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the Parties
desire to amend the Original Agreement.


NOW THEREFORE, for good
and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


  


		1.	Amendments. The Original Agreement shall be amended as follows:



 


		a.	References to this “Agreement” shall mean the Original Agreement as amended by this
Amendment.



 


		b.	Section 3(a) of the Original Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:



 


“(a) Cash Stipend. Effective
May 1, 2018, the Director shall receive a monthly cash stipend of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000). In addition, the Director shall
receive a cash stipend of $1,000 for every in-person meeting that the Director attends.”


 


		2.	Governing Law; Jurisdiction. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the internal laws of the State of New York without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule (whether
of the State of New York or any other jurisdiction). Any legal proceeding arising out of or based upon this Agreement shall be
instituted in the federal courts or the courts of the state of New York and each party irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction
of such courts in any such proceeding.



 


		3.	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed to be an original copy and all of which together shall constitute one agreement binding on all parties hereto, notwithstanding
that all the parties shall not have signed the same counterpart.



 






    	 		 



     


    

 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
each of the undersigned hereby (a) executes this Agreement; (b) confirms its agreement with the provisions and covenants herein
provided; and (c) agrees to be bound by this Agreement. 








	MERIDIAN WASTE SOLUTIONS, INC.	 	 	DIRECTOR	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Name: Jeffrey Cosman	 	 	, an individual	 
	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

            CERTIFICATIONS OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


      We, Thomas O. Ryder and Michael S. Geltzeiler, of The
Reader's Digest Association, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004
      (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2)   information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      The Reader's Digest Association, Inc.

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is
not being filed as part of the Periodic Report.


Dated:  September 8, 2004




                                         /s/ THOMAS O. RYDER
                                           Thomas O. Ryder



                                      /s/ MICHAEL S. GELTZEILER
                                        Michael S. Geltzeiler
CIRCUIT COURT OF ALLEGHANY COUNTY

#### In re First Virginia Bank-Highlands, Trustee of Laura W. Moomaw Trust under the Will of Laura W. Moomaw, deceased

June 21, 1985

By JUDGE DUNCAN M. BYRD, JR.

The issue before the Court in this matter is whether or not income payable to Benjamin C. Moomaw, III, pursuant to a spendthrift trust provision is subject to alienation by Court ordered spousal support. The appropriate trust provision provides that "the income payable to my son, Benjamin C. Moomaw, III, shall not be transferable or assignable by him, and further directs that no creditor of my said son shall have the right or power to attach, garnishee, or by other means of legal process levy upon, such income payable to my said son." The applicable Code provision recognizing the validity of spendthrift trusts is Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, Section 55-19, which provides:

> Estates of every kind holden or possessed in trust shall be subject to the debts and charges of the persons to whose use or to whose benefit they are holden or possessed, as they would be if those persons owned the like interest in the things holden or possessed as in the uses or trusts thereof, but any such estate, not exceeding five hundred thousand dollars in actual value, may be holden or possessed in trust upon condition that the corpus thereof and income therefrom, or either of them, shall be applied by the trustee to the support and maintenance of the beneficiaries without being subject to their liabilities or to alienation by them, but no such trust shall operate to the *383prejudice of any existing creditor of the creator of such trust.

> Spendthrift trusts are recognized as valid in Virginia, *Alderman*v. *Virginia Trust*Co., 181 Va. 407, 25 S.E.2d 333 (1943). The purpose of a spendthrift trust is to prevent alienation and to free the income from claims of the beneficiary’s creditors. *Colonial-American Nat'l Bank*v. *United States,*243 F. 2d 312 (4th Cir. 1957).

The clear legislative purpose of Code § 55-19 is to allow the donor to provide for the support and maintenance of the beneficiary. The Court is of the opinion that strong public policy dictates that this include the *support and maintenance of the beneficiary’s dependents*because the rights are so intimately connected and blended with each other.

The Court’s research for authority on this point has not been fruitful. Nevertheless, there is authority in other jurisdictions to the . effect that "[e]ven where there is nonalienability legislation in effect, the Courts have sometimes upheld the wife’s right to an involuntary transfer of future income for her support from the husband’s spendthrift trust. *Re Knauth’s Trust,*12 N.Y.2d 259, 238 N.Y.S.2d 942, 189 N.E.2d 482." 76 Am. Jur. 2d, Trusts, § 162. In this particular case, the facts are much stronger. The defendant has concurred in this alienation. Additionally, the beneficiary of the alienation, Mrs. Helen S. Moomaw, is also a beneficiary of the trust in question as a remainderman.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of TEXAS EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC (Company), a
Delaware limited liability company, acting in its capacity as general partner of
TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership,
does hereby appoint CHARLES H. LEONARD, JAMES C. RUTH AND WILLIAM L. THACKER,
and each of them, his true and lawful attorney and agent to do any and all acts
and things, and execute any and all instruments which, with the advise and
consent of Counsel, said attorney and agent may deem necessary or advisable to
enable the Company to comply with the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and
any rules, regulations, and requirements thereof, to sign his name as a director
and/or officer of the Company to the Form 10-K Report for TEPPCO Partners, L.P.
and for TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership, each for the year
ended December 31, 2000, and to any instrument or document filed as a part of,
or in accordance with, each said Form 10-K or amendment thereto; and the
undersigned do hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorney and agent shall
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have subscribed there presents this 9th
day of March, 2001.


      /s/ WILLIAM L. THACKER                           /s/ JIM W. MOGG
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
William L. Thacker                           Jim W. Mogg

        /s/ MILTON CARROLL                           /s/ FRED J. FOWLER
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Milton Carroll                               Fred J. Fowler

         /s/ CARL D. CLAY                             /s/ MARK A. BORER
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Carl D. Clay                                 Mark A. Borer

      /s/ JOHN P. DESBARRES                       /s/ WILLIAM W. SLAUGHTER
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
John P. DesBarres                            William W. Slaughter

         /s/ DERRILL CODY                          /s/ CHARLES H. LEONARD
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Derrill Cody                                 Charles H. Leonard
                                             Senior Vice President, Chief
                                             Financial Officer, and Treasurer
Exhibit 13.3  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Luxottica Group S.p.A. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stefano Grassi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:  1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:
/s/ STEFANO GRASSIStefano GrassiChief Financial Officer   Dated: April 21, 2016  This written statement accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         26,270
<SECURITIES>                                   45,287
<RECEIVABLES>                                  70,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,775)
<INVENTORY>                                    80,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              275,758
<PP&E>                                      2,980,849
<DEPRECIATION>                               (160,978)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              5,531,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         434,673
<BONDS>                                     2,423,211
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,779,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                5,531,597
<SALES>                                        56,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              107,387
<CGS>                                         201,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 958,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,906
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (53,354)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (897,462)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (897,462)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (897,462)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 23.2
------------




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
NewsEdge Corporation on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-98786, 333-46863, and 333-46899)
of our report dated January 30, 1998, except as to the information in Note 15,
for which the date is February 27, 1998, on our audit of the consolidated
financial statements of Individual, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and for the
years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
March 22, 1999
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-2801

Lower Tribunal No. 11-CF-05070

_____________________________

ALEJANDRO BENABE-RIVERA,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Luis F. Calderon, Judge.

August 13, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Dane K. Chase, of Chase Law Florida, P.A., Saint Petersburg, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney 

General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS<F1>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                           1,074
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,939
<PP&E>                                          67,553
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,086
<BONDS>                                        124,440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     35,000
<COMMON>                                         9,178
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   237,836
<SALES>                                        164,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               164,200
<CGS>                                          130,740
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,214
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,416
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,374
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,964
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,964
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1996
REPRESENT THE COMBINED RESULTS OF CLARK-SCHWEBEL HOLDINGS, INC. ("COMPANY") FOR
THE PERIOD OF APRIL 18, 1996 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 28, 1996 (SUCCESSOR COMPANY) AND
THE RESULTS OF FORT MILL A, INC. FOR THE PERIOD OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 THROUGH
APRIL 17, 1996 (PREDECESSOR COMPANY).  A CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP RESULTED FROM A
LEVERAGED BUYOUT ON APRIL 17, 1996, AND THE TRANSACTION RESULTED IN A NEW BASIS
OF ACCOUNTING FOR THE COMPANY.  THEREFORE, THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1996 ARE NOT FULLY COMPARABLE TO PRECEDING
REPORTING PERIODS.  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM
THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-23-00389-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 231st District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 231-724540-22

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

GINA DONNIE BROWN, Appellant

V.

RODERICK THOMAS BROWN, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered Appellant’s “Motion to Dismiss,” which is unopposed. 

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 26, 2023
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6638** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DONALD CHANEY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Margaret B. Seymour , District Judge. ( 3:08

- cr - 00773

- MBS

- 1; 3:11

- cv - 70059

- MBS )

Submitted : September 11, 2012 Decided: October 31, 2012

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Donald Chaney, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Claude Jendron, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Donald Chaney seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on proc edural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the r ecord and conclude that Chaney has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motion to hold the case in abeyance, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conte ntions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2908 

To protect the First Amendment rights of individuals to share their 

experiences and perceptions of the effects of foods and dietary supplements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2011 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To protect the First Amendment rights of individuals to 

share their experiences and perceptions of the effects 

of foods and dietary supplements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Testimonial Free 

5 Speech Act of 2011’’. 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2908 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISSEMINATION OF CONSUMER TESTIMONIALS RE2 GARDING THE MITIGATIVE, PREVENTIVE, OR 

3 CURATIVE PROPERTIES OF A FOOD OR DIE4 TARY SUPPLEMENT. 

5 (a) DISSEMINATION OF TESTIMONIALS.—Notwith6 standing the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 

7 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), the Federal Trade Commission Act 

8 (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.), and any other provision of law— 

9 (1) no Federal official or employee may restrict 

10 dissemination of a testimonial containing a con11 sumer’s actual perception of the mitigative, preven12 tive, or curative properties of any food or dietary 

13 supplement based on the consumer’s experience with 

14 that food or dietary supplement; and 

15 (2) if a person disseminating a testimonial rea16 sonably believes that the dissemination is covered by 

17 paragraph (1), such dissemination shall not con18 stitute a violation of any Federal law. 

19 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) applies to the 

20 dissemination of a testimonial described in such subsection 

21 by any person, including dissemination by the manufac22 turer of a food or dietary supplement for purposes of mar23 keting. 

24 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act, the terms ‘‘food’’ and 

25 ‘‘dietary supplement’’ have the meanings given to those 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2908 IH

1 terms in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos2 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 321). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS