alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43057

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JOHN ANTHONY SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 455

Filed: March 30, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Cheri C. Copsey, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and concurrent unified life sentences, with minimum 

periods of confinement of twenty-five years, for three counts of sexual battery of 

a minor child sixteen or seventeen years of age and being a persistent violator, 

affirmed. 

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

John Anthony Sanchez was found guilty of three counts of sexual battery of a minor child 

sixteen or seventeen years of age, I.C. § 18-1508A, and being a persistent violator, I.C. § 19-

2514. The district court sentenced Sanchez to concurrent unified life terms, with minimum 

periods of confinement of twenty-five years. Sanchez appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 
2

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Sanchez’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, J. Theodore Borter, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
     Form 10-K of the GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-GCJ12 (the "Exchange
     Act periodic reports");


  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
     do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
     material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
     respect to the period covered by this report;


  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
     by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
     the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their
     obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
     of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
     to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
     and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit
     to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
     instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:


Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital
Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as
Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, Situs Holdings, LLC, as
Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. as Servicing
Function Participant, and National Tax Search, LLC as Servicing Function
Participant.


    Dated:   March 28, 2014


    /s/ J. Theodore Borter
    Signature

    President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
STATE OF LOUISIANA I

I

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

SPECIALIST CALEB D. JONES

I

NO. 2023 KW 0414

MAY 8, 2023

In Re: Specialist Caleb D. Jones,, applying for supervisory

I

writs, Special Court-Martial~ Parish of Lafayette, No. 

2002-341. 

BEFORE: THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED. The military judge',s ruling finding that the

military court has jurisdiction over , this matter is reversed. 

Under the facts and circumstances Qf this case where the

incident did not occur on a military installation nor while

relator and the victim were on duty of status, we find that a

clear and convincing nexus between

I

the offense under the

Louisiana Code of Military Justice and1the state military force

I

does not exist. See La. R.S. 29:102(C). Accordingly, the

objection raising the exception of subject matter jurisdiction

and motion to dismiss is granted. 

MRT

CHH

Chutz, J., dissents and would deny ~ he application. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

O\.cJ) 

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM MARCH 31, 1998 10-Q BALANCE SHEET & INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
        <S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       7,506,984
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               44,429,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,340,521
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            64,930,721
<PP&E>                                      30,545,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             146,547,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,532,735
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,903
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,676,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               146,547,985
<SALES>                                     32,682,376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,682,376
<CGS>                                       17,801,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,801,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,665,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,343,625
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,359,798
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,488,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,488,093)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,488,093)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.54)
        

</TABLE>
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  S TEVEN F ISHER , Plaintiff-Appellee,

and S ANDRA F ISHER , Plaintiff, No. 04-16095

v. D.C. No. C ITY OF S AN J OSE , CV-01-21192-PVT

Defendant-Appellant, Northern District



#  and of California, San Jose C ITY OF S AN J OSE P OLICE D EPARTMENT ; O FFICERB OLER ; ORDER O FFICERB ARNETT ; O FFICER C ORREA ; O FFICERE SQUIVEL ; O FFICERH ONDA ; O FFICERK INSWORTHY ; O FFICER O’B RIEN ; O FFICERR YAN ; O FFICER N GUYEN , Defendants. 

# 

Filed March 14, 2008

ORDER
KOZINSKI , Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

2653PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson/West.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
TEPPCO Partners, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, I, Jerry E. Thompson, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC, the general partner of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and





2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.











/s/  JERRY E.
THOMPSON


Jerry E.
Thompson


President
and Chief Executive Officer


Texas
Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC, General Partner





March 2,
2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and will be retained by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001015551
<NAME>                        Sprint Spectrum L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                         55
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  421
<ALLOWANCES>                                   37
<INVENTORY>                                    298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               824
<PP&E>                                         6,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,609
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,945
<BONDS>                                        8,360
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,303)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,098
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               751
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (423)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (423)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (423)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caliper Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James L. Knighton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 14, 2003

                             /s/ JAMES L. KNIGHTON
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             James L. Knighton
                             Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.15

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                           GOLD BANC CORPORATION, INC.
                          1996 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
                          -----------------------------

          THIS  FIRST  AMENDMENT,  made and entered into this 20th day of March,
2000,  by  Gold Banc Corporation, Inc. (the "Corporation"), amends the Gold Banc
Corporation,  Inc.  1996  Equity  Compensation  Plan  (the  "Plan"),  originally
established  and  approved  by  the Corporation's shareholders effective May 30,
1996.

          WITNESSETH:

          WHEREAS,  the Corporation adopted the Plan under which the Company was
authorized  to  make  available  up  to  250,000  shares of Company common stock
("Shares")  under  option  grants,  stock  appreciation rights, restricted stock
grants,  performance  shares  and  performance  unit  awards (the "Awards"); and

          WHEREAS,  the  Company  effected a 2-for-1 stock split in 1997 thereby
allowing,  in  accordance with the terms of the Plan, up to 500,000 Shares to be
available  to  become  subject  to  Awards  granted  under  the  Plan;  and

          WHEREAS, the Company has reached the 500,000 maximum Share limit under
the  Plan  and,  in order to continue to be able to grant Awards under the Plan,
has  authorized  an increase to the maximum Share limit as set forth in the Plan
by  One  Hundred  Fifty  Thousand  (150,000)  Shares;

          NOW,  THEREFORE,  the  Corporation  hereby  amends the Plan effective,
March  20,  2000,  as  follows:

          1.   AMENDMENT  TO  SECTION  4.1
               ---------------------------

          Section  4.1  of  the Plan shall hereby be deleted in its entirety and
replaced  with  the  following  Section  4.1.

          4.1  Number  of  Shares.  Subject to adjustment as provided in Section
               ------------------
     4.3,  the  total number of Shares available for grant under this Plan shall
     not exceed 650,000. Shares granted under this Plan may be either authorized
     but  unissued  Shares  or  treasury  Shares,  or  any  combination thereof.


<PAGE>
          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this First Amendment to
be  adopted,  and  the Corporation, by its duly authorized officer, has executed
this  First  Amendment  on  this  20th  day  of  March,  2000.

                                        GOLD  BANC  CORPORATION,  INC.

                                        By:  /s/  Michael  W.  Gullion
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Michael W. Gullion,  President


<PAGE>
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATE OF DELAWARE, ) )
v. ) ID No. 2101000281 ) BYRON STAFFORD , ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER

1. On this 9th day of January , 202 4 , upon consideration of Defendant Byron

Stafford’s (“Defendant”) pro se Motion for Sentence Modification (the “Motion”) made pursuant to Superior Court Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 (b) , 1 the sentence imposed upon Defendant, and the record in this case, it appears to the Court that:

2. On March 16, 2022, Defendant pled guilty to Robbery in the Second Degree and Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of a Felony (“PFDCF”). 2

3. On March 30, 2022, this Court sentenced him to (1) Robbery, five years of Level V supervision, followed by six months of Level IV supervision, followed by one year of Level III supervision and (2) PFDCF, three years of Level V supervision. 3

4. On October 5, 2023, Defendant filed the instant Motion, in which he asks

th e Court to modify the Level IV supervision portion of his sentence to Level IV

1 D.I. 23. Defendant does not specifically cite to Rule 35(b) in the Motion, but he asks this Court to modify the conditions of his probation

. 2 D.I. 17. 3 D.I. 18.2

( Home Confinement ). In support, he states that his mother is willing to host him for this period and that he has secured employment. 4

5. Rule 35(b) authorizes this Court to “r educe the . . . conditions of partial confinement or probation, at any time.” A motion to modify the terms of partial confinement or probation is not subject to the ninety

- day limitation that applies to a

motion for sentence reduction. 5

6. After reviewing the Motion, sentence, and record in this case, the Court finds no just cause for sentence modification. 6 Defendant’s sentence is appropriate for all the reasons stated at the time of sentencing. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion

is DENIED.

IT I S SO ORDERED.

______________________________ Sheldon K. Rennie, Judge

Original to Prothonotary

cc: Byron Stafford (SBI # 00802990 )

4 D.I. 23. 5 State v. Harmon , 2023 WL 7599111, at *1 (Del. Super. Nov. 14, 2023) (quoting State v. Baily , 2017 WL 8787504, at *1 (Del . Super. Oct. 3, 2017)). 6 Whe re this Court has considered similar motions to modify the Level IV portion of a sentence to remove the discretion of the Delaware Department of Correction, it has tended to deny them

. See State v. Snead , 2023 WL 2987103, at * 1 (Del. Super. Apr. 12, 2023); State v. Starkey , 2020 WL 2789704, at * 2 (Del. Super. May 29, 2020); State v. Charles , 2020 WL 2026833, at * 2 (Del. Super. Apr. 21, 2020); State v. Joseph , 2018 WL 1895697, at * 1 (Del. Super. Apr. 11, 2018); Stat e v. Kilson , 2016 WL 1590965, at * 1 (Del. Super. Apr. 14, 2016)

.
Offer Letter Agreement between Exelixis, Inc. and Lupe M. Rivera



 Exhibit 10.19 
 January 7, 2002 
 Lupe M. Rivera 
 Dear Lupe: 
 We are proud to invite you to join our team. 

Our offer of employment is to join Exelixis, Inc. Your title will be that of Associate Director, Human Resources reporting to Lisa Stemmerich, Director,
Human Resources in our Human Resources department. Other terms of employment include: 
 Compensation: You will receive four thousand
four hundred fifty-eight dollars and thirty-three cents ($4,458.33) per pay period. There are two pay periods per month. You will receive a sign-on bonus of eleven thousand dollars ($11,000.00) payable on the first pay date after hire. Should you
elect to voluntarily terminate employment with the Company within twelve (12) months of your hire date, the sign-on bonus will be entirely re-paid by you to the Company on your last date of employment. 

Options for Equity: You will also be eligible to receive a stock option for twenty-five thousand (25,000) shares of
Exelixis stock pursuant to our standard Stock Plan and subject to approval by the Board of Directors. Options vest at the rate of 1/4th after one year and 1/48th every month thereafter over a total of four years. 
 Benefits: All full-time employees of Exelixis, Inc. enjoy a generous benefits package, which is outlined on the attached Summary of Benefits. 

Performance Review: Focal reviews will take place annually during the month of December, at which time your performance will be reviewed.








 Lupe M. Rivera 
 January 7, 2002 
 Page Two 
 Start Date: On Tuesday, January 22, 2002. 
 Confidentiality: As you are aware,
it is very important for us to protect our confidential information and proprietary material. Therefore, as a condition of employment, you will need to sign the attached Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement. 

Other: In addition to performing the duties and responsibilities of your position, you will be expected to perform other duties and
responsibilities that may be assigned to you from time to time. No provision of this letter shall be construed to create an express or implied employment contract for a specific period of time. Either you or the Company may terminate this employment
relationship at any time, with or without cause. This letter shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Also, by signing this letter, you are indicating that you are legally authorized to work in the U.S. 

You may accept this offer of employment by signing both copies of this letter and Proprietary Information and Invention Agreements and returning one of
each to Lisa Stemmerich, Director, Human Resources 
 Lupe, we look forward to your coming on board! 

Sincerely, 
 /s/ Lisa Stemmerich 

Lisa Stemmerich 
 Director of Human Resources

 ACCEPTED BY: 
  

			
	 /s/ Lupe M. Rivera
	    	January 8, 2002
	Lupe M. Rivera	    	Date

 Enclosures: 

Benefit Summary 
 Confidentiality Agreement

 DE-4 (optional) 
 Direct Deposit Form
(optional) 
 Employee Information Form 

I-9 
 Insider Trading Policy 

W-4
I 

★

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 274 

To rename the Homestead National Monument of America near Beatrice, 

Nebraska, as the Homestead National Historical Park. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2011 

Mr. FORTENBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To rename the Homestead National Monument of America 

near Beatrice, Nebraska, as the Homestead National 

Historical Park. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HOMESTEAD NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK. 

4 (a) RENAMING.—The unit of the National Park Sys5 tem known as the Homestead National Monument of 

6 America and located near Beatrice, Nebraska, shall be 

7 known as the ‘‘Homestead National Historical Park’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the unit of the National Park System known 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 274 IH1S 

1 as the Homestead National Monument of America shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Homestead National 

3 Historical Park’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS