Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 187 / Thursday, September 28, 2017 / Notices 45267 

2See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 

3Certain Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic 

of Vietnam: Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value, 80 FR 29622 (May 22, 2015). 

symmetrical point, suitable for use in 

gas-actuated hand tools. 

Also excluded from the scope of this 

order are corrugated nails. A corrugated 

nail is made up of a small strip of 

corrugated steel with sharp points on 

one side. 

Also excluded from the scope of this 

order are thumb tacks, which are 

currently classified under HTSUS 

subheading 7317.00.10.00. 

Certain steel nails subject to this order 

are currently classified under HTSUS 

subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 

7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05, 

7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08, 

7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18, 

7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20, 

7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40, 

7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 

7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80, 

7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30, 

7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00. 

Certain steel nails subject to these 

orders also may be classified under 

HTSUS subheadings 7907.00.60.00, 

8206.00.00.00 or other HTSUS 

subheadings. 

While the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of this order is dispositive. 

Final Results of Review 

The Department received no 

comments concerning the Preliminary 

Results. Accordingly, the Department 

continues to determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for these final results: 

Company 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Dicha Sombrilla Co., Ltd ...... 323.99 

Rich State, Inc ...................... 323.99 

Truong Vinh Ltd .................... 323.99 

Disclosure 

Normally, the Department discloses to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed for the final results within 

five days of the publication of this 

notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). However, because we made 

no changes to these margins since the 

Preliminary Results, no disclosure of 

calculations is necessary for these final 

results. 

Assessment 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the 

Department has determined, and 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. The 

Department intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of the final results of 

this administrative review in the 

Federal Register. 

Consistent with the Department’s 

assessment practice in non-market 

economy (NME) cases, for entries that 

were not reported in U.S. sales 

databases submitted by companies 

individually examined during the 

administrative review, the Department 

will instruct CBP to liquidate such 

entries at the Vietnam-wide rate. 

Additionally, if the Department 

determines that an exporter under 

review had no shipments of subject 

merchandise, any suspended entries 

that entered under the exporter’s case 

number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will 

be liquidated at the Vietnam-wide rate.2

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise from 

Vietnam entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the publication date, as provided for by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

Truong Vinh, Rich State, and Dicha 

Sombrilla, the cash deposit rate will be 

equal to the weighted-average dumping 

margin listed above; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed Vietnamese 

and non-Vietnamese exporters not listed 

above that received a separate rate in a 

prior segment of this proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most-recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the exporter was 

reviewed; (3) for all Vietnamese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be that established for the Vietnam-wide 

entity, which is 323.99 percent; 3 and (4) 

for all non-Vietnamese exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

Vietnamese exporter that supplied that 

non-Vietnamese exporter with the 

subject merchandise. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h). 

Dated: September 22, 2017. 

Carole Showers, 

Executive Director, Office of Policy, 

Performing the Duties of the Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2017–20800 Filed 9–27–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. CPSC–2010–0056] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request—Safety 

Standard for Bicycle Helmets 

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, the Consumer 

Product Safety Commission (CPSC or 

Commission) announces that the CPSC 

has submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) a 

request for extension of approval of a 

collection of information associated 

with the CPSC’s Safety Standard for 

45268 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 187 / Thursday, September 28, 2017 / Notices 

1The Commission voted 3–2 to publish this 

Guidance Document in the Federal Register. 

Commissioner Robert S. Adler, Commissioner 

Marietta S. Robinson, and Commissioner Elliot F. 

Kaye voted to approve publication of the Guidance 

Document. Acting Chairman Ann Marie Buerkle 

and Commissioner Joseph P. Mohorovic voted 

against publication of the Guidance Document. 

2For purposes of this guidance, OFRs refers to 

additive, non-polymeric chemicals only; it does not 

include reactive or polymeric OFRs. 

3This guidance is not a binding or enforceable 

rule and would not change any person’s rights, 

duties, or obligations under the Federal Hazardous 

Substances Act or any other Act administered by 

the Commission. 

Bicycle Helmets (OMB No. 3041–0127). 

In the Federal Register of July 21, 2017 

(82 FR 33875), the CPSC published a 

notice announcing the agency’s intent to 

seek an extension of approval of this 

collection of information. CPSC 

received no comments in response to 

that notice. Therefore, by publication of 

this notice, the Commission announces 

that CPSC has submitted to the OMB a 

request for extension of approval of that 

collection of information without 

change. 

DATES: Written comments on this 

request for extension of approval of 

information collection requirements 

should be submitted by October 30, 

2017. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments about 

this request by email: OIRA_

submission@omb.eop.gov or fax: 202– 

395–6881. Comments by mail should be 

sent to the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk 

Officer for the CPSC, Office of 

Management and Budget, Room 10235, 

725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 

20503. In addition, written comments 

that are sent to OMB also should be 

submitted electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov, under Docket No. 

CPSC–2010–0056. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Charu S. Krishnan, Consumer Product 

Safety Commission, 4330 East West 

Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 

504–7221, or by email to: ckrishnan@

cpsc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CPSC has 

submitted the following currently 

approved collection of information to 

OMB for extension: 

Title: Safety Standard for Bicycle 

Helmets. 

OMB Number: 3041–0127. 

Type of Review: Renewal of 

collection. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion. 

Affected Public: Manufacturers and 

importers of bicycle helmets. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 38 

manufacturers and importers will 

maintain test records of an estimated 

200 models total annually, including 

older models and new models. Testing 

on bicycle helmets must be conducted 

for each new production lot and the test 

records must be maintained for 3 years. 

Estimated Time per Response: 200 

hours/model to test 40 new models 

(including new prototypes) and an 

estimated 100 hours/model to test new 

production lots of 160 older models. 

Additionally, manufacturers and 

importers may require 4 hours annually 

per model for recordkeeping for 

approximately 200 models. 

Total Estimated Annual Burden: 

24,800 hours (24,000 hours for testing 

and 800 hours for recordkeeping). 

General Description of Collection: In 

1998, the Commission issued a safety 

standard for bicycle helmets (16 CFR 

part 1203). The standard includes 

requirements for labeling and 

instructions. The standard also requires 

that manufacturers and importers of 

bicycle helmets subject to the standard 

issue certificates of compliance based 

on a reasonable testing program. Every 

person issuing certificates of 

compliance must maintain certain 

records. Respondents must comply with 

the requirements in 16 CFR part 1203 

for labeling and instructions, testing, 

certification, and recordkeeping. 

Alberta E. Mills, 

Acting Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–20779 Filed 9–27–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

[CPSC Docket No. CPSC–2015–0022] 

Guidance Document on Hazardous 

Additive, Non-Polymeric 

Organohalogen Flame Retardants in 

Certain Consumer Products 

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

ACTION: Guidance document. 

SUMMARY: The Commission announces 

that it has approved a statement that 

provides guidance for manufacturers, 

importers, distributors, retailers, and 

consumers of certain consumer products 

that may contain harmful organohalogen 

flame retardants in an additive form. To 

protect consumers and children from 

the potential toxic effects of exposure to 

these chemicals, the Commission 

recommends that manufacturers of 

children’s products, upholstered 

furniture sold for use in residences, 

mattresses (and mattress pads), and 

plastic casings surrounding electronics 

refrain from intentionally adding nonpolymeric, organohalogen flame 

retardants (‘‘OFRs’’) to their products. 

Further, the Commission recommends 

that, before purchasing such products 

for resale, importers, distributors, and 

retailers obtain assurances from 

manufacturers that such products do not 

contain OFRs. Finally, the Commission 

recommends that consumers, especially 

those who are pregnant or with young 

children, inquire and obtain assurances 

from retailers that such products do not 

contain OFRs. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

DeWane Ray, Deputy Director, Safety 

Operations, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission, 4330 East West Highway, 

Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone: (301) 

504–7547, or email: JRay@cpsc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of 

the guidance document is as follows: 

Guidance for Hazardous Additive, NonPolymeric Organohalogen Flame 

Retardants in Certain Consumer 

Products 

Summary: The U.S. Consumer 

Product Safety Commission 1 issues this 

guidance to manufacturers, importers, 

distributors, retailers, and consumers to 

protect consumers (particularly 

children) from exposure to additive, 

non-polymeric organohalogen flame 

retardants (‘‘OFRs’’) 2 found in the 

following products: (1) Durable infant or 

toddler products, children’s toys, child 

care articles or other children’s products 

(other than children’s car seats); (2) 

upholstered furniture sold for use in 

residences; (3) mattresses and mattress 

pads; and (4) plastic casings 

surrounding electronics.3 OFRs, also 

referred to as halogenated flame 

retardants, typically are added to foams, 

textiles, and polymers before, during or 

after production in theory to improve 

their resistance to fire. OFRs are not 

chemically bound to the substrate and 

may be released from the product, 

thereby leading to potential human and 

environmental exposures. On June 30, 

2015, a coalition of consumer advocates 

and health professionals petitioned the 

Commission to declare four categories of 

consumer products containing OFRs to 

be ‘‘banned hazardous substances’’ 

under the Federal Hazardous 

Substances Act (‘‘FHSA’’). The 

petitioners claim that due to their 

inherent physical-chemical properties, 

OFRs, among other things, are toxic, 

migrate widely out of products 

regardless of how the products are used, 

bioaccumulate, and present a serious 

public health concern. On September 

20, 2017, the Commission voted to grant 

the petition to initiate rulemaking under