alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit23.1**

 

 

# **INDEPENDENTAUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementsNo. 33-52916 and No. 333-11157 of VirtualFund.com, Inc. on Form S-8 of ourreport dated October 21, 1999, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof VirtualFund.com, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2001.

 

                                                                                                        /s/Deloitte and Touche LLP

 

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

December 18, 2002

 

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 7 , 2015 

# Order

Clerk July 7 , 2015

149536 (67)

DAVID ABBO, COLORADO TOYZ,

INC., and WIRELESS PHONES, LLC,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

SC: 149536

v COA: 304185

Oakland CC: 2007

- 082804

- CK

WIRELESS TOYZ FRANCHISE, LLC,

JOE BARBAT, RICHARD SIMTOB,

JSB ENTERPRIZES, INC., and JACK

BARBAT,

Defendants

- Appellants.

____________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of defendants

- appellants to extend the

time for filing their supplemental brief to August 7 , 2015 is GRANTED. The time for

filing the supplemental brief of plaintiffs

- appell ee s is similarly extended to August 7

, 2015.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000             JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000             JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,413                   5,413
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,437                  30,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,657)                 (1,657)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,997                  37,997
<PP&E>                                          22,638                  22,638
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,101)                (14,101)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,855                 131,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,863                  19,863
<BONDS>                                         49,743                  49,743
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           102                     102
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,147                  62,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,855                 131,855
<SALES>                                         61,778                 124,501
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,778                 124,501
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,624                 121,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   247                     494
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,242                   2,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (88)                     776
<INCOME-TAX>                                       264                     723
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (352)                      53
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (352)                      53
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)                    0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)                    0.01


</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB



I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby
certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the
"Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the "Servicer" and "Sponsor")
under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of July 24, 2013 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American
Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2013-3 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2015, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
this 8thday of June, 2015.



| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
#### Regis G. VEATCH, a Pennsylvania Resident and; Marilyn S. Veatch, his wife, Appellants, v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS; Service Employees International Union.

No. 07-3005.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) May 23, 2008.

Filed May 30, 2008.

Mark J. Bushnell, Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellants.

Caroline P. Liebenguth, Office of Allegheny County Law Department, Pittsburgh, PA, Claudia Davidson, Pittsburgh, PA, for Allegheny County Bureau of Corrections; Service Employees International Union.

*160Before: SMITH, HARDIMAN, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

After his employment was terminated for misconduct, Appellant Regis Veatch sued the Allegheny County Bureau of Corrections for violations of the Labor Management Relations Act. He also sued his union, the Service Employees International Union, for an alleged breach of its duty of fair representation. The District Court dismissed his complaint, determining that it lacked jurisdiction because neither Allegheny County nor the SEIU are “employers” within the meaning of the LMRA.

Before the District Court, and then again on appeal, Veatch argues that he was not an employee of Allegheny County, but rather of the County Jail Oversight Board. Both parties concede that the Allegheny County jail is operated and maintained by the County Jail Oversight Board. In *Crilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority,*529 F.2d 1355 (3d Cir.1976), we held that a transportation authority was not an “employer” for purposes of the LMRA because it was a political subdivision. We also held that employees working for the authority could not be considered “employees” within the meaning of the LMRA. The Board here, like the transportation authority in *Crilly,*is a creature of statute and, therefore, a political subdivision of the government— exempting it from the LMRA. We will affirm.
EXHIBIT 99.2

CARROLLTON BANCORP

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Carrollton Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and which this Certification is an exhibit (the "Report"), the undersigned

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
reflected therein.

|Date: March 4, 2003 |  |  | /s/RANDALL M. ROBEYRandall M. Robey Treasurer, Executive Vice President & CFO
|------------------- |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
EX-35.13
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc.
Bank of America Tower
One Bryant Park
Attn: Leland F. Bunch
New York, NY 10036


RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent for the Southdale Center loan (in
such capacity, "Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the
year ending December 31, 2013 (the "reporting period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its
    performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Scheduled
    A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision;
    and

(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
    has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all
    material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on
    Schedule B.


March 26, 2014


/s/ Brian Smith
Brian Smith, Vice President


To:  Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc.

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1. Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2013, by and among
BANC OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE INC, as Depositor, WELLS
FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, A
Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, and SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC, as Trust Advisor
and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and
Custodian relating to the Series MSBAM 2013-C11 Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates , relating to the Southdale Center loan, a pari passu
portion of which is included in the Series MSBAM 2013-C10 Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates transaction.

To:  Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc.

Schedule B

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

Not Applicable
exv10w24






Exhibit 10.24








A G C O C O R P O R A T I O N




DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

for

NON —  EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

(as of January 1, 2011)



	 	 	 	 	 
	Retainers (1)	 	USD
	Annual Lead Director Retainer (paid only to Lead Director):
	 	 	30,000	 
	Annual Director Base Retainer (applies to all Directors):
	 	 	90,000	 
	Annual
Committee Chairperson Retainer: 

     
(except Audit
Committee and Compensation Committee Chair)
	 	 	15,000	 
	Annual Audit Committee Chairperson Retainer:
	 	 	25,000	 
	Annual Compensation Committee Chairperson Retainer:
	 	 	20,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Additional Compensation
	 	 	 	 
	Annual AGCO Stock Grant Award (2)
	 	 	100,000	 





In addition, the Company will reimburse directors for the reasonable out-of-pocket expense incurred
in the attendance of the meeting.




Page 1 of  2









 









A G C O C O R P O R A T I O N




DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

for

NON — EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

(as of January 1, 2011)


Notes:





	1)	 	Payments of annual retainers are made in accordance with the following provisions:






	 	I)	 	Annual Retainers are paid quarterly in four installments (for ease of
calculation purposes quarters are divided into 90 days with a 360 day year).
	 
	 	II)	 	Annual Retainers accrue as of the first day of each calendar quarter
based on the Board and Committee Membership Roster in effect on that date.
	 
	 	III)	 	Annual Retainers are paid in advance during the first month of the
given calendar quarter (e.g., January for the first quarter).
	 
	 	IV)	 	Changes to Board and Committee Memberships (including Chairpersons)
will be reviewed and adjustments made to current quarter’s retainer amounts (up or
down).
	 
	 	V)	 	Any changes in the Retainer amounts due for the current quarter will
be reflected in the ensuing quarter’s retainer payment.






	2)	 	Terms applicable to the Stock Grant Award are defined in the Plan Document. The stock
grant equivalent to USD 100,000 is based on closing price on the day of the Annual
Shareholder’s ’meeting.






Page 2 of  2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          44,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,155
<PP&E>                                          14,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 339,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,262
<BONDS>                                        275,321
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,287
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   339,763
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,019
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,246
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,808
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,204)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,253
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,457)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (17,579)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,036)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.30)
        

</TABLE>
CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY

#### Klein v. Dart Drug Corp.

September 26, 1974

Case No. (Law) 16458

By JUDGE WILLIAM W. WINSTON

This case is before the Court on that portion of the Defendant’s Answer to the Request to Produce which denies the Plaintiff’s right to records, memoranda, correspondence or other documents relating to arrests made by a certain employee of the Defendant while on the job. The records relating to this case have been furnished, but the issue is drawn on other arrests.

The test to be applied is one of relevancy to the subject matter, but inadmissibility is no ground for objection if what is sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Rule 4:l(b)(l). The agent’s prior conduct or his pattern of behavior is no more relevant to the issues in the case than a litigant’s driving record would be in an automobile accident case. However, the agent’s scope of authority or his employer’s instructions to him in arrest situations might, for example, be disclosed by the requested information. In any event the Court cannot say that the requested information might not be reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

In the granting of this discovery the Defendant is entitled to a protective order pursuant to which it will not be required to disclose the names and addresses of any other persons arrested or detained.
November 25, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

VINCENT COLBY DUFFEY, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00803-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                               THE CANTON COMPANY
                             4000 Warner Boulevard
                             Building 81, Room 200
                               Burbank, CA 91522

                                  June 2, 2000

Peter F. Paul                                                              DRAFT
Stan Lee Media
15821 Ventura Boulevard
Encino, CA 91436

          Re:  MARK CANTON / "THE SEVENTH PORTAL" ("PICTURE")
               ----------------------------------------------

Dear Peter:

          This letter will confirm our understanding that in consideration for
both my and The Canton Company's (collectively, "Canton") continuing efforts to
secure financing and set up the Picture for development, financing and/or
production with a third party financier ("Third Party"), Canton shall have the
exclusive right commencing on the date hereof and continuing for a period of 6
months hereafter, to exclusively pitch and submit the Picture to Third Parties
for development, financing and/or production. It is understood that if the
Picture is set up with a Third Party, Canton will be the producer thereof and
shall be entitled to Canton's then current standard producing deal (e.g.,
currently the Warner Bros. deal). Please note we are in the process of making an
arrangement with Peter Dunne as it relates to this relationship.

          In addition, we would like to discuss a more comprehensive
arrangement between Stan Lee Media and Canton in connection with other Stan Lee
properties including, for example, the Back Street Boys movie.

          Please sign on the space indicated below to confirm your agreement to
the foregoing and return a copy of same to me for my files.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        DRAFT

                                        /s/ MARK CANTON
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Mark Canton

MC:

cc:  Jacob A. Bloom, Esq.
     Steven L. Brookman, Esq.

/s/ STAN LEE
-----------------------------------
Stan Lee
Stan Lee Media
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS
C O RA Z O N LA B A O F E R R E R , A N H E IR & A SSI GNEE OF ARTURO L AB AO Ap pe lla nt,
v. NOEMI GUEVA RA, Appellee
. § § § § § § No . 0 8- 04 -0 02 00 -C V

Appea l from the 215th District Court of Ha rris County , Texas (TC# 2002-63463)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION ON REMAND Pending be fore the Court is a ag ree d upon motion requesting this Court t o rende r judgme nt effe ctuatingthe par ties’ settlement agree ment. By their motion, the parties have
rea ched a settlement ag ree ment resolvingall disputes betwee n them, including the matters at iss ue in t his a pp e a l. Rul e 42 .1 of

the Te xas R

ule s o f A pp e llate Pr oc e dure a

uth or ize s a

n a pp e llate c ourt

to dispose of an a

ppeal pur suant to an ag ree ment of the pa rties. T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a)( 2). The Court may

rende r judg ment eff

ectuating the pa

rties’ a g ree ment, set aside ( vacate) the tria l court’s judgme nt and re mand the ca se to the trial cour t for re ndition of judgment in ac corda nce w ith the ag ree ment, or abate the appe al and pe rmit procee dings in the tria l court to eff ectuate the ag ree ment. T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a)( 2). Th e pa rt ie s h ave a g re e d th a t th is C ourt sh ou ld r e nd e r j ud g me nt e ff e c tuatin g the pa

rt ie s’
a g re e me nt. Ac c or din g ly , th e joi nt m oti on to d isp os e of

the a pp e a l in a c c or da nc e wi th t he pa rt ie s’-2-

ag ree ment is gr anted. We re nder judg ment that the medica l expenses awar d be subjec t to a $1 ,0 88 ,8 42 .8 9 r e mittit

ur re su lti ngin a

me dic a l e xpe ns e s a

wa rd of $2 0, 32 6. 53 . App e lla

nt i s
awa rded $125,000 f

or pain a nd mental anguish. Appellant will rece ive $29,673.47 for a g ree d interest and c ourt costs. Our mandate will issue ten day s from the date of this opinion and jud g me nt. Aug ust 14, 2008 DAVI D WEL L I NGTONCHEW, C hief Just ice B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l u r e , a n d C ar r , JJ.
ex10_76.htm


EXHIBIT 10.76







FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE


USEC INC. DIRECTOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


 


WHEREAS, USEC Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted that certain USEC Inc. Director Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2008 (the “Plan”);


 


WHEREAS, the Company has appointed the USEC Inc. Benefit Plan Administrative Committee (the “Committee”) as the Committee to interpret, administer and apply the provisions of the Plan document; and


 


WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 9.1 of the Plan, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to make certain clarifying changes to the Plan;


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:







 


1.           Section 6.1(c) of the Plan is amended and restated to read as follows:


 



	
(c)

	
Small Benefit Exception.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) with respect to amounts deferred on or after November 1, 2010, if payment is made in installments, immediate payment of all remaining installments shall be made if the present value of the deferred amount to be paid in the remaining installments falls below twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000), and (ii) if at the time of any payment from an Account, the Distributable Amount from such Account is less than or equal to the applicable dollar amount under Code Section 402(g)(1)(B) ($16,500 in 2010), the full Distributable Amount shall be paid from such Account in a single lump sum payment, provided such single lump sum payment results in the distribution of the Participant’s entire interest in all nonqualified deferred compensation considered under Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(c)(2) to be deferred under a single plan of which the Plan is a part.







 


2.           Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


Executed as of this 15th day of November, 2010


 


USEC Inc.


 







By:           /s/ W. Lance Wright                                                                


W. Lance Wright


Title:        Senior Vice President, Human Resources and


Administration







 







--