alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N

o t i c e : T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o f o r m a l r e v i

s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e A t l a n t i c

a n d M a r y l a n d R e p o r t e r s

. U s e r s a r e r e q u e s t

e d t o n o t i f y t h e C l e r k o f t h e C o u r t o f a n y

f o r m a l e r r o r s s o t

h a t c o r r e c t

i o n s m a y b e m a d e b e

f o r e t h e b o u n d v o l u m e s g o t

o p r e s s

.

D I S T R I C T O F C O L U M B I A C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

N o

. 1 5

- B S

- 8 1

I N R E : T O D D L

. T R E A D W A Y

, R e s p o n d e n t

. B o a r d D o c k e t N o

. 1 5

- B D

- 0 0 1

B a r R e g i s t r a t i o n N o

. 4 7 9 2 3 3 B D N : 7 8

- 1 2

B E F O R E : G l i c k m a n a n d B l a c k b u r n e

- R i g s b y

, A s s o c i a t e J u d g e s ; a n d R u i z

, S e n i o r

J u d g e

.

O R D E R

( F I L E D

- F e b r u a r y 1 2

, 2 0 1 5 )

O n c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e a f f i d a v i t o f T o d d L

. T r e a d w a y

, w h e r e i n h e c o n s e n t s t o

d i s b a r m e n t f

r o m t h e B a r o f

t h e D i s t r i c t o f

C o l u m b i a p u r s u a n t t o § 1 2 o f R u l e X I o f

t h e

R u l e s o f t h e D i s t r i c t o f C o l u m b i a C o u r t o f A p p e a l s G o v e r n i n g t h e B a r o f t h e D i s t r i c t o f

C o l u m b i a

, w h i c h a f

f i d a v i t h a s b e e n f

i l e d w i t h t h e C l e r k o f t h i s C o u r t

, a n d t h e r e p o r t a n d

r e c o m m e n d a t i o n o f t h e B o a r d o n P r o f e s s i o n a l R e s p o n s i b i l i t y

, i t i s t h i s 1 2 d a y o f

F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 5

,

O R D E R E D t h a t t h e s a i d T o d d L

. T r e a d w a y i s h e r e b y d i s b a r r e d b y c o n s e n t

,

e f f e c t i v e f o r t h w i t h

. T h e e f

f e c t i v e d a t e o f r e s p o n d e n t ’ s d i s b a r m e n t s h a l l r u n

, f o r

r e i n s t a t e m e n t p u r p o s e s

, f r o m t h e d a t e r e s p o n d e n t f i l e s h i s a f f i d a v i t p u r s u a n t t o D

. C

. B a r

R u l e X I

, § 1 4 ( g )

.

T h e C l e r k s h a l l p u b l i s h t h i s o r d e r

, b u t t h e a f f i d a v i t s h a l l n o t b e p u b l i c l y d i s c l o s e d

o r o t h e r w i s e m a d e a v a i l a b l e e x c e p t u p o n o r d e r o f t h e c o u r t o r u p o n w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f

t h e r e s p o n d e n t

.

T h e C l e r k s h a l l c a u s e a c o p y o f t h i s o r d e r t o b e t r a n s m i t t e d t o t h e C h a i r m a n o f t h e

B o a r d o n P r o f

e s s i o n a l R e s p o n s i b i l i t y a n d t o t h e r e s p o n d e n t

, t h e r e b y g i v i n g h i m n o t i c e

o f t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f R u l e X I

, § § 1 4 a n d 1 6

, w h i c h s e t f o r t h c e r t a i n r i g h t s a n d

r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s o f d i s b a r r e d a t t o r n e y s a n d t h e e f f e c t o f f a i l u r e t o c o m p l y t h e r e w i t h

.

P E R C U R I A M
#### William Santiago *vs.*Paula Marie Young.

March 24, 2006.

*Moot Question. Practice, Civil,*Moot case, Party pro se.

William Santiago appeals from a judgment of the county court denying without a hearing his petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. We dismiss the appeal as moot.

In June, 2003, Santiago filed, in the Roxbury District Court (now the Roxbury Division of the Boston Municipal Court [Roxbury Division]), a motion seeking to vacate three G. L. c. 209A restraining orders that were issued between 1993 and 1995 for the protection of Paula Marie Young. In his G. L. c. 211, § 3, petition, Santiago alleged that despite his repeated requests, the lower court refused to act on his motion. He requested that the single justice order the court to act. The single justice denied this request.

On appeal from the single justice’s ruling, Santiago filed a memorandum and appendix pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 2:21, as amended, 434 Mass. 1301 (2001). We determined that that rule did not apply to this case because Santiago was not challenging any interlocutory ruling of the trial court, but rather the inaction of the court. Accordingly, we allowed this appeal to proceed in the usual process. In our order, we encouraged Santiago to make further efforts to get the Roxbury Division to act. He did make further efforts, and in December, 2005, a judge of the Roxbury Division in fact heard and denied his motion. Santiago has thus received the specific relief he was seeking in his petition — a ruling on his motion.1 His appeal from the denial of relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, is therefore moot. See *Rasten*v. *Northeastern Univ.,*432 Mass. 1003 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1168 (2001); *Harvey*v. *Harvey,*424 Mass. 1009 (1997).

It is regrettable that it took well over two years and repeated prodding to persuade the court simply to rule on Santiago’s motion, and unfortunately it appears that this is not an isolated occurrence. See, e.g., *Muldoon*v. *Superior Court Dep’t of the Trial Court,*439 Mass. 1010 (2003); *Matthews*v. *Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Inst., Cedar Junction,*438 Mass. 1012 (2003); *Sabree*v. *Commonwealth,*432 Mass. 1003 (2000). Pro se litigants, like all *1007litigants, are entitled to timely action on their cases. Nonetheless, now that the court has acted, we are constrained to dismiss Santiago’s appeal as moot.

*William*Santiago, pro se.

*Appeal dismissed.*

1

In his appellate brief, Santiago urges us to vacate the G. L. c. 209A orders ourselves. This relief was not sought before the single justice, and we do not consider it. The lower court’s ruling, by which the judge declined to vacate the G. L. c. 209A orders, can be addressed in the ordinary appellate process.
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Registrant and Jonathan M. Tisch



Exhibit 10.22


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	  	 February 15, 2011



 
 
 
 
 
 Mr. Jonathan M. Tisch
 667 Madison Avenue
 New York, New York 10065
 
 

Dear Mr. Tisch:

 
 Reference is made to your Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Loews Corporation (the "Company") dated February 25, 2008 (as amended, the "Employment
Agreement").
 
 
 This will confirm our agreement that the Employment Agreement is amended as follows:


 
 1.     Term of
Employment.  The period of your employment under and pursuant to the Employment Agreement is hereby extended for an additional period through and including March 31, 2012 upon all the terms, conditions and provisions of the
Employment Agreement, as hereby amended.
 
 
 2.     Compensation.  You
shall be paid as basic compensation (the "Basic Compensation") for your services to the Company and its subsidiaries under and pursuant to the Employment Agreement a salary at the rate of Nine Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand ($975,000) Dollars per
annum through  March 31, 2012.  Basic Compensation shall be payable in accordance with the Company's customary payroll practices as in effect from time to time, and shall be subject to such increases as the Board of Directors of
the Company, in its sole discretion, may from time to time determine.
 
 

3.  
   Incentive Compensation Plan.  In addition to receipt of Basic Compensation under the Employment Agreement, you shall participate in the Incentive
Compensation Plan for Executive Officers of the Company (the “Compensation Plan”) and shall be eligible to receive incentive compensation under the Compensation Plan as may be awarded in accordance with its terms.


 
 4.     Other
Compensation.  The compensation provided pursuant to this Letter Agreement shall be exclusive of compensation and fees, if any, to which you may be entitled as an officer or director of a subsidiary of the Company.


 
 Except as herein modified or amended, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
 

   
 

 
 
   
 
    
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 

Mr. Jonathan M. Tisch

As of February 15, 2011

Page 2
 


  
 If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding, would you please sign the enclosed duplicate copy of this Letter Agreement at the place indicated below and return the
same to us for our records.
 
 
 
 
 
	  	 Very truly yours,
 
	  	  
	  	 LOEWS CORPORATION
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
	  	 By:
 	 /s/
Gary W. Garson
 
	  	  	 Gary W. Garson
 
	  	  	 Senior Vice President
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
	 ACCEPTED AND AGREED
TO:
 	      


	  	  
	 /s/
Jonathan M. Tisch
 	  
	 Jonathan M. Tisch
Exhibit 10-3-2







Exhibit
10-3-2



GANNETT SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN




Restatement dated August 7, 2007




Amendment No. 2 




Gannett Co., Inc. hereby makes the following clarifying amendment to the Gannett Supplemental
Retirement Plan, restatement dated August 7, 2007, (the “Plan”), as follows:



Section 8.5(b) of the Plan is amended by adding the following new sentence to the end thereof:




For purposes of this Plan, any reference to “termination of employment”, “retirement” or
similar term shall mean a “separation from service” within the meaning of Section 409A.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Gannett Co., Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly
authorized officer as of December 22, 2010.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	

GANNETT CO., INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Roxanne V. Horning
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Roxanne V. Horning 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President/Human Resources
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL J. LAWLESS, M.D.; JENNIFER )

CREWS, PA-C; and EMERGENCY )

MEDICAL ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA, )

LLC, )

)

Appellants/Cross-Appellees, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1899

) 2D18-2934

JOHN BIRGE, )

) CONSOLIDATED

Appellee/Cross-Appellant. )

)

Opinion filed November 8, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Jack St. Arnold, Judge.

Dinah S. Stein and Aneta A. Kozub of 

Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., 

Miami; and Mark E. McLaughlin of Beytin, 

McLaughlin, McLaughlin, O'Hara, Kinman & 

Bocchino, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants/ 

Cross-Appellees.

Tracy Raffles Gunn of Gunn Appellate 

Practice, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee/CrossAppellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

BLACK, LUCAS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
076P-R000010533_0001 

Message 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Thirdwave2 [thirdwave2@speakergingrich.com] 

11/10/2020 12:33:17 PM 

Molly Michael [Molly.A.Michael@who.eop.gov]; congressman Mark Meadows [Mrmcos@who.eop.gov] 

[EXTERNAL] Fwd: Only two options-please give to POTUS newt 

From Randy Evans explaining the two ways you win and the one way you could lose newt 

Sent from my iPad 

Begin forwarded message: 

From: 

Date: November 10, 2020 at 6:16:43 AM EST 

To: Thirdwave2 <thirdwave2@speakergingrich.com>, 

Subject: Only two options 

Verified, audited results from properly counted, legal and timely ballots - Trump Wins 

Pelosi/ Schumer raw partisan political power rule - GOP legislatures elect to not send in electors 

from an unreliable and rigged system before all questionable conduct has been answered which 

means Biden does not receive 270 electoral votes, and consequently, the House voting by state 

delegations (26) elect the President - Trump wins. 

The only way Trump loses is rigged system (like the insurance policy of Russia collusion) and 

Republicans do not have the will to push back for the truth. This is coup 3.0 - Russian 

Collusion; Impeachment; and now Rigged Election.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2890 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2890

To expand homeland security at public water systems and treatment works 
    by allowing the Secretary of Homeland Security to include these 
 facilities in the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2011

    Mr. Clarke of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To expand homeland security at public water systems and treatment works 
    by allowing the Secretary of Homeland Security to include these 
 facilities in the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO REGULATE CERTAIN TREATMENT WORKS 
              AND PUBLIC WATER SYSTEMS TO THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE 
              ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.

    Section 550 of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations 
Act, 2007 (Public Law 109-295; 6 U.S.C. 121 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Public Water Systems, 
        as defined by section 1401 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, 
        Public Law 93-523, as amended; Treatment Works as defined in 
        section 212 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Public 
        Law 92-500, as amended;''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i)(1) The President shall delegate to the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency the authority otherwise provided to the 
Secretary under this section with respect to--
            ``(A) a treatment works, as such term is defined by section 
        212(2) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
        1292(2)); and
            ``(B) a public water system, as such term is defined by 
        section 1401(4) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 
        300f(4)).
    ``(2) The Secretary shall provide technical assistance regarding 
compliance with regulations under this section, to any operator of a 
facility or treatment works referred to in paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.3
NETHERLAND, SEWELL
& ASSOCIATES, INC.

          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Edisto Resources
Corporation's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration
Nos. 33-74598 and 33-74600) and references to our firm contained in the Edisto
Resources Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1996.

                      NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

                              By:   /S/ FREDERIC D. SEWELL
                                    Frederic D. Sewell
                                    President

Dallas, Texas
March 27, 1997
tmok2010ex10_55.htm


Exhibit 10.55


 


THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO


2009 RESTATEMENT OF EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT NO. 2 (the “Amendment”) to the 2009 Restatement of Executive Severance Agreement dated November 21, 2009, as previously amended by Amendment No. 1 dated February 25, 2010 (the “Agreement”) by and between Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (the “Company”) and Marc N. Casper (the “Executive”) is made as of November 30, 2010.  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.







WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into the Agreement to provide separation pay and benefits to the Executive in the event the Executive’s employment with the Company is terminated under certain circumstances;







WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Agreement to reflect compliance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration for the mutual promises contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows.








	
1.  

	
Section 8 of the Agreement is hereby amended by inserting the following text at the end thereof:







 


“g.           The provisions of Section 3.4 shall be applied as follows:  Payment of benefits under this Agreement shall be made on (or, with respect to in kind benefits subject to Section 409A, commence on) the 60th day following the Executive’s separation from service, provided that the Executive has by that time executed and submitted the release of claims and separation agreement described in Section 3.4.  The Company shall provide the Executive with a form of release and separation agreement promptly following the Executive’s separation from service, but in no event later than seven (7) days following the Executive’s separation from service.”


 



	
2.  

	
Except as expressly modified herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







 



	
3.  

	
This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which shall be one and the same document.







 


 


[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]











  





  











  






 


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by the parties hereto as of the day and year first above written.


 


                                    THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.


 


 


                                    By:  __________________________________


                                             Name:


                                             Title:


 


 


 


                                    MARC N. CASPER


 


 


                                    __________________________________


















  





  





 2
Exhibit 32.1

      STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                     ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Mary Lynn D. Lenz, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Slade's Ferry Bancorp. (the "Company").  This statement is being
furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the
"Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
            78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
            covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



March 29,  2005                        /s/ Mary Lynn D. Lenz
-------------------------              -------------------------------------
(Date)                                 (Signature)         Mary Lynn D. Lenz
                                           President/Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001017358
<NAME>                        Sprint Spectrum Finance Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,497
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,497)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
RETROSPETTIVA, INC. 10QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          20,438
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,032,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,306,278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,934,299
<PP&E>                                       1,054,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,378,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,664,038
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,842,820
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,871,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,378,215
<SALES>                                     14,803,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,803,715
<CGS>                                       12,669,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,634,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             305,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,493,532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   704,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (789,532)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>