alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Charles & Colvard, Ltd.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert S. Thomas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert S. Thomas                 
|Robert S. Thomas                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 17, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partners 1989-2, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operaitons contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         39,798
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  188,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               228,084
<PP&E>                                         1,411,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,161,783)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 477,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,271
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     475,105
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   477,376
<SALES>                                        262,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               262,793
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  93,118<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                136,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            136,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   136,953
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2767 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 8 West Silver Street in Westfield, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘William T. Trant Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2767 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. WILLIAM T. TRANT POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 8 West Silver Street in Westfield, 

4 Massachusetts, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘William T. Trant Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William T. Trant Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 13, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 11.1


                                  CNET, INC.
                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                      Three months ended             Nine months ended
                                         September 30,                  September 30,
                                  --------------------------     --------------------------
                                      1996           1995            1996           1995
                                  -----------    -----------     ------------    -----------
<S>                               <C>            <C>             <C>             <C>
Net loss                          $(4,679,173)   $(2,322,230)    $(12,698,175)   $(5,965,481)
                                  -----------    -----------     ------------    -----------
                                  -----------    -----------     ------------    -----------
Weighted average shares
 outstanding during the period:
  Preferred                            62,717      5,707,204        3,811,746      5,707,204
  Common                           13,145,132      2,700,000        6,192,785      2,700,000

Shares issued and stock option
 and warrants granted in
 accordance with SAB No. 83             8,888        808,841          540,211        808,841
                                  -----------    -----------     ------------    -----------
Shares used in calculating
 per share data                    13,216,737      9,216,045       10,544,742      9,216,045
                                  -----------    -----------     ------------    -----------
                                  -----------    -----------     ------------    -----------
Net loss per share                $     (0.35)   $     (0.25)    $      (1.20)   $     (0.65)
                                  -----------    -----------     ------------    -----------
                                  -----------    -----------     ------------    -----------
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        [ARTHUR ANDERSON LLP LETTERHEAD]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS As independent public accountants, we
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Form S-8 Registration
Statements (Nos. 33-66672 and 33-66674) pertaining to the 1988 Stock Option Plan
and the 1991 Stock Option Plan of JMAR Technologies, Inc., Form S-3 Registration
Statements (Nos. 33-47390, 33-96848, 333-24353 and 333-52703) and Form S-8
Registration Statements (Nos. 333-10923 and 333-10925) of our report dated March
22, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of JMAR
Technologies, Inc.

                                        /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


San Diego, California
March 30, 2000
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Allen GADDY, a/k/a Douglas Gaddy, Appellant.

No. 07-1852.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) June 6, 2008.

Filed June 9, 2008.

Denise S. Wolf, Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for United States of America.

Robert Epstein, Defender Association of Philadelphia Federal Court Division, Philadelphia, PA, for Allen Gaddy.

Before: AMBRO, CHAGARES and COWEN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

A jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania convicted Allen Gaddy of four counts of drug and gun possession in May 2005. The District Court imposed an aggregate term of 168 months’ imprisonment, a special assessment of $300, a fine of $500, and an eight-year term of supervised relief. On appeal, we remanded under *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The District Court imposed the same sentence on remand, with the exception that it added the special condition of supervised release that Gaddy “seek gainful employment in the clothes apparel field.” He now appeals the imposition of that special condition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

The District Court did not give reasons for its imposition of the challenged condition of supervised release. This leaves us guessing as to its rationale. Though an educated guess follows, we are not sure our surmise is right.

> While the district court has broad discretion in fashioning conditions of supervised release, the sentencing judge is required by statute to state the reasons in open court for imposing a particular sentence. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3553(c). By explaining the reasons behind the sentence, the court ensures that appellate review does not “flounder in the zone of speculation.”

*United States v. Loy,*191 F.3d 360, 370-71 (3d Cir.1999) (quoting *United States v. Edgin,*92 F.3d 1044, 1049 (10th Cir.1996)). To avoid that speculation, and because of the restriction of liberty represented by the condition of supervised release, we have no choice but to vacate and remand.

We note that an officer supervising Gaddy’s release could construe the challenged condition as prohibiting Gaddy from pursuing employment outside the clothes apparel field. We doubt that the District Court intended to limit Gaddy’s employment options in this fashion. The Court likely meant to encourage Gaddy to seek any gainful • employment and only emphasized the garment industry because of Gaddy’s experience as a tailor. However, the condition’s ambiguous language highlights the challenge facing us when we lack a sufficient statement of the reasons for sentence. The statement of reasons on re*193mand will allow us to understand and review Gaddy’s sentence on any future appeal.

We thus vacate the challenged condition of supervised release and remand to the District Court.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 13, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00321

- CR

Roy Gene NEWMAN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 2536

- CR

- C

The Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

It is so ORDERED on July 13, 2016.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of July, 2016.

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0255 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ALEK RICHARD EGGETT,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 15 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 10 2023

08/10/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0255
Exhibit
10.22
 AVANIR PHARMACEUTICALS
 [2005] [2003] Equity Incentive Plan
Restricted Stock Unit Director Grant Agreement
    Award of Restricted Stock Units
 Vesting
 Effect of Termination
 Distribution Exhibit A
 Deferral Election Exhibit A




---



##### 



Dividends
 Tax Withholding Obligations
 Restriction on Transferability
 Rights as Shareholder
 Administration
 Effect on Other Employee Benefit Plans
 No Employment, Consulting or Board Service Rights
 2




---



##### 



Amendment
 Notices
 Severability
 Construction
 Miscellaneous
  3




---



##### 



[Directors Name]
    

    Avanir PharmaceuticalsBy:Keith Katkin
President and Chief Executive Officer
 4




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 AVANIR PHARMACEUTICALS
RSU DEFERRAL ELECTION
  1.
    
    Election: The undersigned hereby elects to receive the distribution (in Company
Shares) of Avanir Class A common stock underlying vested Restricted Stock Units as follows
(please select one of the three distribution choices below):
 o
    
    In one lump sum upon termination of my service as a director that constitutes a
Separation from Service (as defined in the final regulation promulgated under
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Regulation)
(Termination of Service); oro
    
    In one lump sum on ____________ (but not before my Termination of Service); oro
    
    In _________ equal annual installments, starting on ____________ (but not before
my Termination of Service).  2.
    
    Change of Election: I hereby acknowledge that I may not change the date of the
distribution as elected above unless I do so at least twelve months prior to the date the
first distribution is due under the election above and at least twelve months prior to the
date my new election is scheduled to take effect. I also acknowledge that if I change my
distribution date elected above, the first date I may receive any distribution with respect
to Shares covered by this election is not earlier than five years after the date payment
would otherwise have been made pursuant to the election above. Such change must be timely
filed in writing with the Companys stock option administrator. The Company shall have sole
discretion to revise the terms of this election or any change, or the procedures with
respect to making this election or any change, to the extent the Company deems it helpful
or appropriate to comply with applicable law.
 Director Signature
    
    DatePrint Name
 5
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1




     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aware, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



/s/   Michael A. Tzannes                              /s/   Keith E. Farris
------------------------                              --------------------------
Chief Executive Officer                               Chief Financial Officer


Date:  August 2, 2007                                 Date: August 2, 2007


        The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document of the
Company or the certifying officers.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2841 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2841

   To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to approve 
   waivers under the Medicaid Program under title XIX of the Social 
   Security Act that are related to State provider taxes that exempt 
                    certain retirement communities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 2, 2011

                Mr. Womack introduced the following bill

                           September 6, 2011

            Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to approve 
   waivers under the Medicaid Program under title XIX of the Social 
   Security Act that are related to State provider taxes that exempt 
                    certain retirement communities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Provider Tax Administrative 
Simplification Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDER TAX RULE EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN CONTINUING CARE 
              RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES.

    In the case of a State that has a provider tax that does not apply 
to continuing care retirement communities or life care communities (as 
such terms are used for purposes of section 1917(g) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(g)) that have no beds that are certified 
to provide medical assistance (as such term is defined under section 
1905(a) of such Act) under title XIX of the Social Security Act or that 
do not provide services for which payment may be made under title XIX 
of the Social Security Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services 
shall approve a waiver under section 433.68(e)(2)(iii) of title 42 of 
the Code of Federal Regulations regardless of whether the Secretary 
determines that the State satisfies the requirements of section 
433.68(e)(2)(iii)(B) of such title.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2947 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2947

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2012

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To provide for the release of the reversionary interest held by the 
United States in certain land conveyed by the United States in 1950 for 
       the establishment of an airport in Cook County, Minnesota.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST AND USE CONDITIONS, COOK 
              COUNTY AIRPORT, COOK COUNTY, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Release of Reversionary Interest Required.--The Secretary of 
Agriculture, acting on behalf of the United States, shall release, 
without consideration--
            (1) the conditions imposed on the use of the parcel of land 
        originally conveyed by the Secretary pursuant to section 16 of 
        the Federal Airport Act (Act of May 13, 1946, ch. 251, 60 Stat. 
        170) to the State of Minnesota by deed executed May 31, 1950, 
        for the establishment of an airport in Cook County, Minnesota; 
        and
            (2) the reversionary interest retained by the United States 
        in connection with such conditions.
    (b) Instrument of Release.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall 
execute and file in the appropriate office a deed of release, amended 
deed, or other appropriate instrument reflecting the release of the 
reversionary interest and conditions under subsection (a).

            Passed the House of Representatives April 24, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Blackhawk Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Todd J. James, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Todd J. James
-----------------------------
Todd J. James
Executive Vice President and CFO
March 25, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.