alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*

After examining the briefs and the records, we have concluded that oral argument is

unnecessary.  Thus, the appeals are submitted on the briefs and the records.  See FED. R. APP.

P. 34(a)(2).

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted November 13, 2008*

Decided November 14, 2008

Before

         RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

         ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

         TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 08‐1988

AARON HYCHE,

Petitioner‐Appellant,

v.

NEDRA CHANDLER,

Respondent‐Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

No. 07 CV 380 WDS

William D. Stiehl,

Judge.

O R D E R

Aaron Hyche appeals from the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus,

see 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in which he challenges the refusal of the Illinois Prisoner Review Board

to release him on parole.  The district court concluded that Hyche’s petition is premature

because he did not exhaust his state remedies before turning to federal court.  We conclude,

however, that Hyche does not state a claim under federal law.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 08‐1988 Page 2

Hyche currently is serving indeterminate prison terms on his 1976 convictions in

Effingham County, Illinois, for murder (250 to 300 years) and attempted murder (25 to 75

years).  After he was denied parole for the fourteenth time, Hyche petitioned for a writ of

habeas corpus, claiming that the review board had denied him due process.  The district

court referred the petition to a magistrate judge and without objection adopted his

recommendation to dismiss the case without prejudice.  The magistrate judge reasoned that

Hyche had not exhausted his state‐court remedies and thus his § 2254 petition was

premature.

In this court Hyche continues to insist that he exhausted his state remedies.  But he

waived that contention by not objecting to the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation.  See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985);

United States v. Hall, 462 F.3d 684, 688 (7th Cir. 2006).  More importantly, though, the

exhaustion issue is irrelevant.  Illinois prisoners have no entitlement to parole, and a hope to

be released on parole in a discretionary system does not create a protected “liberty” or

“property” interest under the Fourteenth Amendment. Heidelberg v. Ill. Prisoner Review Bd.,

163 F.3d 1025, 1027 (7th Cir.1998); see Montgomery v. Anderson, 262 F.3d 641, 645 (7th Cir.

2001) (explaining that parole system making release entirely discretionary “means that the

setting of a parole‐release date does not entail ‘liberty’ or ‘property’”).  Thus, Hyche’s

contention that the review board denied him due process does not state a claim under

§ 2254, see Heidelberg, 163 F.3d at 1027, and for that reason the district court should have

dismissed the petition with prejudice.

The dismissal is modified to be with prejudice, and as MODIFIED the judgement is

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
SarbanesOxley Act of 2002

I, Marcel Martin, the Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Haynes International, Inc., certify that
(i) the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Haynes
International, Inc. as of the dates and for the periods set forth therein.

/s/ MARCEL MARTIN Marcel Martin Vice President Finance and
Chief Financial OfficerNovember 24, 2008 Date


I,
Mark Comerford, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Haynes International, Inc., certify that (i) the annual report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Haynes International, Inc. as of the dates and for the periods set forth
therein.

/s/ MARK COMERFORD Mark Comerford President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 24, 2008 Date


---



QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner 

v.

NEIL ROBERT GELB,

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2598 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 174 DB 2018

Attorney Registration No. 60543

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2019, upon consideration of the Recommendation 

of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint Petition in Support of 

Discipline on Consent is granted, and Neil Robert Gelb is suspended on consent from the 

Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of eighteen months. Respondent shall comply 

with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant 

to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          20,282
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,673
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,867
<INVENTORY>                                     60,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,916
<PP&E>                                         788,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,779,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,530
<BONDS>                                      1,003,669
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,042,529
<OTHER-SE>                                   (410,199)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,779,339
<SALES>                                        209,462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,462
<CGS>                                           43,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  185,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (669)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,490)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,030
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,520)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (107)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,627)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Joseph G. Bleser, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Transcend Services, Inc. for the yearended December 31, 2003; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 12, 2004
Thirteenth Amendment to Entegris, Inc. 401(k) Savings and Profit Sharing Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT 
 OF 

ENTEGRIS, INC. 
 401(k) SAVINGS AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN 
 (2005 Restatement)

 Entegris, Inc., a Delaware corporation, has heretofore established and maintains a profit sharing plan (the
“Plan”) which, in most recent amended and restated form, is embodied in a document effective August 5, 2005, and entitled “ENTEGRIS, INC. 401(k) SAVINGS AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN (2005 Restatement),” as amended by twelve
amendments (collectively, the “Plan Statement”). The Plan Statement is hereby further amended in the following respect: 
 1.
COMPLIANCE WITH HEART ACT. Effective January 1, 2009, Section 1.2 of the Plan Statement shall be amended to read in full as follows: 
 1.2. Compliance With Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 and Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act of 2008. Effective for veterans rehired on or after
December 12, 1994, and notwithstanding any provision of the Plan Statement to the contrary, contributions, benefits or service credits, if any, will be provided in accordance with section 414(u) of the Code. Effective January 1, 2009,
and notwithstanding any provision of the Plan Statement to the contrary, (i) differential pay (as defined in section 3401(h)(2) of the Code) shall be included in compensation that is used to determine benefits, and (ii) the death
after 2006 of a Participant during qualified military service (as defined in section 414(u)(5) of the Code) will be treated as death while in the employment of the Employer and all Affiliates for purposes of any benefits (other than benefit
accruals related to the period of qualified military service) to which the Participant’s survivors would have been entitled had the Participant resumed employment and then terminated employment on account of death. 

2. SAVINGS CLAUSE. Save and except as hereinabove expressly amended, the Plan Statement shall continue in full force and effect.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2726 

To amend the Budget Control Act of 2011 to protect education programs 

from budget cuts under such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2011 

Ms. WILSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Budget Control Act of 2011 to protect 

education programs from budget cuts under such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Education Protection 

5 Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NO EDUCATION CUTS. 

7 (a) NO CUTS THROUGH LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE OF

8 THE JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE.— 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2726 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Title IV of the Budget Con2 trol Act of 2011 is amended by adding at the end 

3 the following new section: 

4 ‘‘SEC. 405. NO EDUCATION CUTS. 

5 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The joint committee shall not in6 clude in its proposed legislative language submitted pursu7 ant to section 401(b)(3)(B)(iv) any provision that reduces 

8 eligibility, payments, or benefits, or otherwise reduces out9 lays or budget authority under— 

10 ‘‘(1) the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9801 et 

11 seq.); or 

12 ‘‘(2) any program administered by the Sec13 retary of Education, including any program under— 

14 ‘‘(A) the Elementary and Secondary Edu15 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.); 

16 ‘‘(B) the Individuals with Disabilities Edu17 cation Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.); 

18 ‘‘(C) the Higher Education Act of 1965 

19 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.); or 

20 ‘‘(D) the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 

21 U.S.C. 701 et seq.). 

22 ‘‘(b) NO APPLICATION OF EXPEDITED PROCE23 DURES.—If the joint committee bill includes a provision 

24 that violates subsection (a), the expedited procedures in 

25 section 402 shall not apply to such bill.’’. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2726 IH

1 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of con2 tents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by in3 serting after the item relating to section 404 the fol4 lowing new item: 

‘‘Sec. 405. No education cuts.’’. 

5 (b) NO CUTS THROUGH FALLBACK SEQUESTRATION

6 PROCESS.—Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and 

7 Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as inserted by 

8 section 302(a) of the Budget Control Act of 2011, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following new para10 graph: 

11 ‘‘(12) NO CUTS FOR EDUCATION.—Notwith12 standing any other provision of law, no sequestration 

13 order issued under this section or section 3101A of 

14 title 31, United States Code, or discretionary spend15 ing limit made under this section shall reduce eligi16 bility, payments, or benefits under any Act or pro17 gram referred to in section 405(a) of the Budget 

18 Control Act of 2011.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2713 

To limit investor and homeowner losses in foreclosures, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2011 

Mr. COHEN (for himself and Mr. MCDERMOTT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To limit investor and homeowner losses in foreclosures, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Limiting Investor and 

5 Homeowner Loss in Foreclosure Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LOSS MITIGATION PROGRAMS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 105 of title 11, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2713 IH

1 ‘‘(e) Without limiting the court’s authority under 

2 subsection (d) or under any other statute or rule, the 

3 court, by local rule or order, may establish and maintain 

4 a loss mitigation program for the consideration and nego5 tiation of consensual alternatives to avoid foreclosure be6 tween an individual debtor and the holder of a claim se7 cured by a security interest in real property that is the 

8 debtor’s principal residence.’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 362(e) of 

10 title 11, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

11 end the following: 

12 ‘‘(3) If the party in interest requesting relief from 

13 the stay under subsection (d) of this section participates 

14 in a loss mitigation program maintained pursuant to sec15 tion 105(e) of this title, the time periods specified in para16 graphs (1) and (2) of this subsection shall be tolled during 

17 the time period commencing on the date on which such 

18 participation began and ending on the date on which no19 tice of such termination is filed and served on the debt20 or.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>





<ARTICLE>                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1000


<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              1,066
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       8,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    11,414
<PP&E>                                              6,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                      4,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      20,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               7,530
<BONDS>                                             207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                          11,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        20,263
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    10,310
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       7,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    3,375
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  58
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (671)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (262)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (409)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (409)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.08)




</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Conference Grants Review.                    

*Date:*                         November 8, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, DEM1, Room 1065, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Carol Lambert, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Democracy 1, Room 1076, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0814,                         *lambert@mail.nih.gov.*
      ( print page 44823)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, B—Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 20, 2017.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-20486 Filed 9-25-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P