alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Prudential-Bache Capital Return
                    Futures Fund 3 and is qualified in its entirety 
                    by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          

<CIK>               0000857850
<NAME>              Prudential-Bache Capital Return Futures Fund 3
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1996

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1996

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1996

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          12,964,695

<SECURITIES>                    9,736,096

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                22,700,791

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  22,700,791

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,442,754

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      21,258,037

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    22,700,791

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                6,248,768

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                3,068,287

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    3,180,481

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   24.90

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.34
 AGREEMENT
   
  WITNESSETH:
     PART I  SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED BY CONSULTANT
 Scope of Work.
 Non-Exclusive Agreement.




---



##### 



PART II  SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED BY
 Documents.
 Project Manager.
 Review of CONSULTANTS Work Product.
 Representative of
 -2-




---



##### 



designee(s)
 PART III  TERMS OF AGREEMENT
 Term of Agreement.
  Compensation.
 Extra Services.
 Accounting Procedures.
 -3-




---



##### 



Indemnity Provisions.
  -4-
      Insurance Requirements.
         -5-
      A.M. Bests
  -6-
      Professional Practices
  -7-
      Termination.
  Suspension, Postponement or Abandonment of Project
  Breach of Agreement.
 -8-
      Ownership of Documents.
 Compliance with Laws.
  Conflict of Interest
   -9-
          PART IV  GENERAL PROVISIONS
 Notification.
 -10-




---



##### 



WITH A COPY TO:CONSULTANT:
    
    JMAR Technologies5800 Armada DriveCarlsbad, CA 92008Telephone: (760) 602-3292Facsimile: (760) 602-3299
  Independent Contractor.
 Successors and Assigns.
 Laws Governing Construction of Terms.
 Service of Process.
 -11-




---



##### 



The Entire Agreement.
  Counterparts.
 Headings.
 Effective Date and Authority.
 -12-




---



##### 



corporationByDATE OF EXECUTION:
    
    ATTEST:11-16-05
    
    
    
    City ClerkJMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.DATE OF EXECUTION:
    
    By
    
    /s/ John P. Ricardi19 Sep 2005
    
    Printed Name:
    
    JOHN P. RICARDITitle:
    
    VP Sensor Products GroupCONSULTANTAPPROVED AS TO FORM:ByAssistant City AttorneyDated 9/23/05/July 1, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Schick Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
Rosner, Director of Finance and Administration of the Company, and its principal
financial officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


                                                  /S/ Ronald Rosner
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Ronald Rosner
                                                  Director of Finance
                                                  and Administration
                                                  (Principal Financial Officer)
                                                  Schick Technologies, Inc.
                                                  August 13, 2003
Slip Op. 08-65 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x CANADIAN LUMBER TRADE ALLIANCE, : et al. , : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Before: Pogue, Judge : : Consol. Ct. No. 05-00324 THE UNITED STATES, et al. , : : : Defendants. :

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

**JUDGMENT**
This consolidated case having been duly submitted for decision, and the Court, after due deliberation, having rendered decisions herein; and Said decisions having been appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; and Said appeal having resulted in a decision affirming-in-part, vacating-in-part, and remanding, Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United States , 517 F. 3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2008); and The Federal Circuit having issued its mandate after appeal;
Now, in conformity with those decisions and mandate, it is hereby

**ORDERED** that the motion of the Government of Canada for judgment on the agency record is **denied** ;

**ORDERED** that the motions of the Defendants and DefendantIntervenors for judgment on the agency record as against the Government of Canada are **granted** ;

**ORDERED** that the motion of the Canadian Wheat Board for judgment on the agency record is **granted** ;

**ORDERED** that the motions of the Defendant and DefendantIntervenors for summary judgment as against the Canadian Wheat Board are **denied** ;

**ORDERED** that the complaints of the Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance, Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc., Ontario Forest Industries Association, Ontario Lumber Manufacturers Association, and the Free Trade Lumber Council are **dismissed as moot** ; and it is further**ORDERED** that the Government of Canada’s complaint is **dismissed** ; and it is further

**ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED**  that pursuant to Section 408 of the North American Free Trade Implementation Act, 19 U.S.C. § 3438, the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2002, 19 U.S.C. § 3438, does not apply to antidumping and countervailing duties assessed on imports of goods from Canada or Mexico; and it is further

**ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED** that Defendant W. Ralph Basham, Commissioner of the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, his employees, officers, agents, attorneys, and successors in office are **permanently enjoined** , as of July 14, 2006 from making any continued dumping and subsidy offsets, payments or distributions, to affected domestic producers, as defined by 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2005), to the extent they derive from duties assessed pursuant to countervailing duty orders, antidumping duty orders, or findings under the Antidumping Act of 1921, upon hard red spring wheat from Canada imported into the United States.

Dated: New York, New York June 10, 2008

/s/ Donald C. Pogue Donald C. Pogue, Judge
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT
                         -----------------------------


The Board of Directors
Vitafort International Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form 
S-8 of Vitafort International Corporation of our report dated February 16, 1996,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Vitafort International 
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995, and the related 
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for 
the year ended December 31, 1995, which report appears in the December 31, 1996,
annual report on Form 10-KSB of Vitafort International Corporation.


                                                       /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Los Angeles, California 
April 15, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          46,644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,460,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                   189,000
<INVENTORY>                                    107,951
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,465,128
<PP&E>                                       1,874,872
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,118,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,256,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,243,003
<BONDS>                                      1,806,024
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,948
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           202
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,203,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,256,001
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,795,792
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,881,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,896
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (108,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             236,391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,419
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,419
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,419
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of HQSM



|                                           |  |                                              
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                         |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation of Organization
|HQ Sustainable Maritime Marketing Inc.     |  | New York                                     
|Jade Profit Investment Limited             |  | British Virgin Islands                       
|Sealink Wealth Limited                     |  | British Virgin Islands                       
|Phoenix Global Creation Limited            |  | British Virgin Islands                       
|                                           |  |                                              
|Jiahua Marine Bio-Products Company Limited |  | Peoples Republic of China                   
|Hainan Quebec Ocean Fishing Co. Ltd.       |  | Peoples Republic of China                   
|Highest Quality Aquaculture Feed           |  |                                              
|Products Company Limited                   |  | Peoples Republic of China
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cell Tech International
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-Q"), I, Marta C. Carpenter, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/ Marta C. Carpenter
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Marta C. Carpenter
                                                     Chief Accounting Officer

                                                     DATED: August 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Cell Tech International
Incorporated and will be retained by Cell Tech International Incorporated and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       27



<PAGE>
## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia

ATLA NTA,

_________________ _ The Court of

Appeals he reby passes

the followi

ng order: A14A1258. BERNARD v. THE STATE.
In 2005, Damien C. Bernard was found guilty of armed robber

y (O CGA § 16- 8-41 (a)) an d sentence d to 20 ye ars. T his court a ffirm ed h i s conviction on direct appeal in an unp ublishe d decisio n. Bernard v. State , 282 Ga. App. XXIV (decided November

11, 2006) (unpublished). In 2014, Bernard filed a m otion for c larific ation of sentence, which was dismissed. B ernard appeals, contending

that the State failed to prove one of the elements of armed robbery (use of a n offensive

weapon) because the jury found him

not guilty

of possession of a firearm during the comm ission of a crime (OCGA § 16-11-1 06). A motion to vacate a conviction is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case and any a ppeal fro m such

a motion is subje ct to dism issal. Harper v. State , 286 Ga. 216, 217-218 (1) , (2) (6 86 SE2d 786) (2009); se e also Roberts v . State , 286 Ga. 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010 ) (dism issing appeal of defe ndant’s m otion to vaca

te conviction). Although Bernard presents his claim as a challe nge to his sentence , he is once again

seeking to v acate the

judgm ent of his c onviction. Accordin gly, h i s appeal is DIS MISSED. In so holding, w e note that Bernard has filed numer

ous appeals with

this Court. We find that this appeal is frivolous and we note that Bernard’s previous appeal was
a lso deem ed frivolo us. See Case No. A13A1943. Under O CGA § 42-12-7.2 , prisoner s who have f

iled three or mo re tim es in state

court and h ad those filings dismissed as July 25, 2014frivolous a

re not per mitte d to file a

ny action in forma pauperis. If B ernard continues to file m eritless pleadings, he will not be perm itted to fi le in form

a pauperi s.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Offi

ce, Atlant a,_______________

___ I certify that th e above is a t rue extract f

rom the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said cou rt hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 07/25/2014
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
      in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:






1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.









Date:
      November 13, 2007   By: /s/
      Joseph M. Cummins


Joseph
      M. Cummins


President,
      Chief Executive
      Officer






Date:
      November 13, 2007   By: /s/
      Gary W. Coy


Gary
      W. Coy


Vice
      President, Chief Financial
      Officer
#### Espey, Jr., *v.*Blanks.*

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Louisiana.*

November 18, 1881.)

1. Contracts — Evidence.

Parol evidence is inadmissible to alter the terms of a written contract.

In Admiralty.

*E. N. Whittemore,*for libellant.

*B. Egan,*for claimants.

*

Reported by Joseph P. Horner, of the New Orleans bar.

Pardee, C. J.

This suit is brought on a hill of lading, and damages are claimed for the non-delivery of the freight in time at the place of consignment. The libellant makes out a case and proves $102.15 damages by the deterioration of the goods and the expenses of telegraphing, and additional freight. There is no defence, except an alleged verbal instruction from the wharf-master to the clerk of the boat to make certain inquiries, and in a certain contingency to deliver the freight at another place than that named in the bill of lading. Objection is made to the introduction of evidence to sustain this defence, and the objection is well taken. See *The Thames,*14 Wall. 98; also, *The Delaware,*Id. 579, where the precise question is decided.

The judgment of the district court was manifestly right, and should be affirmed. Let a like decree as in the district court be entered in this case, with costs.
r 

# Effe- TA1111,

STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS 

### KARNELIUS COLEMAN NO. 

### 2024 KW 0129


### MARCH 22, 

### 2024

In Re: 

### Karnelius Coleman, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs,



### 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

## Tammany, No. 

### 4373-F-2023.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, 

### AND MILLER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator 

### failed to set 

### forth any of the 

### four factors for 

### showing that he 

### has been 

### deprived of his constitutional right to a 

### speedy trial. See Barker v. Winger, 407 U. S. 514, 

### 530, 92 S. Ct. 

### 2182, 2192, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 ( 

### 1972). 

### Furthermore, relator 

### failed to 

### include a copy of the 

### indictment, the pertinent court minutes, and he 

## failed to include with the motion for speedy trial an affidavit 

## executed by his counsel 

### certifying that relator and counsel are 

### prepared to proceed to trial within the applicable time 

### delays. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 

### 701 (D) ( 1) . 

### Supplementation of this 

## writapplication and/oranapplication forrehearingwill notbe considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 

### 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. 

## Any future 

## filing on this 

### issue should 

### include the entire contents of this application, the 

### missing 

### items noted above, 

## andacopyofthis ruling. PMC CHH SMM



### OURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



### UTY CLERKOF COURT FOR THE COURT
II 

Calendar No. 371 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 298 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 500 East Whitestone Boulevard in Cedar 

Park, Texas, as the ‘‘Army Specialist Matthew Troy 

Morris Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ARMY SPECIALIST MATTHEW TROY MORRIS 

4 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 500 East Whitestone Boulevard 

7 in Cedar Park, Texas, shall be known and designated as 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 298 RS

1 the ‘‘Army Specialist Matthew Troy Morris Post Office 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Army Specialist Mat7 thew Troy Morris Post Office Building’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 371 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 298 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Posting’’. cialist Matthew Troy Morris Post Office Build- vard in Cedar Park, Texas, as the ‘‘Army Spe- al Service located at 500 East Whitestone BouleAPRIL 25, 2012 

Reported without amendment 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            Certification Pursuant to

                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

                             As Adopted Pursuant to

                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Houston Exploration Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William G. Hargett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William G. Hargett
--------------------------------------------
Name:  William G. Hargett
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
       The Houston Exploration Company

August 12, 2002