45610 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2017 / Notices 

Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a Shenzhen 

Howshare Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a 

Howshare (‘‘Howshare’’) of Shenzhen, 

China, and Shenzhen SUNstone 

Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a iQbe 

(‘‘iQbe’’) of Shenzhen, China. Id. The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations is 

not participating in this investigation. 

Id. 

On April 11, 2017, the ALJ issued an 

ID finding iQbe in default for failing to 

respond to the complaint, the notice of 

investigation, and multiple discovery 

requests, and for failing to respond to an 

order to show cause why it should not 

be found in default. Order No. 9, not 

reviewed, Notice (May 11, 2017). 

On May 31, 2017, the ALJ issued an 

ID, granting Kent Displays’ motion to 

terminate the investigation with respect 

to Howshare based on a withdrawal of 

the complaint. Order No. 11 (May 31, 

2017). 

On June 1, 2017, Kent Displays filed 

a declaration seeking a limited 

exclusion order (‘‘LEO’’) and a proposed 

cease and desist order (‘‘CDO’’) against 

the defaulted respondent iQbe pursuant 

to section 337(g)(1) and Commission 

Rule 210.16(c). The declaration contains 

Kent Displays’ views on remedy, the 

public interest, and bonding. A 

proposed LEO and CDO were attached 

to the declaration. 

On June 26, 2017, the Commission 

issued a notice determining not to 

review Order No. 11. Notice (Jun. 26, 

2017); 82 FR 29930–31 (June 30, 2017). 

The notice also requested written 

submissions on the issues of remedy, 

the public interest, and bonding 

concerning the requested LEO and CDO 

against iQbe. Id. 

On July 10, 2017, Kent Displays filed 

its submission on remedy, the public 

interest, and bonding. No other 

submissions were received. 

Having reviewed the submissions on 

remedy, the public interest, and 

bonding filed in response to the 

Commission’s Notice, and the 

information provided in the complaint, 

the Commission has determined, 

pursuant to section 337(g)(1), 19 U.S.C. 

1337(g)(1), that the appropriate form of 

relief in this investigation is: (1) An LEO 

against iQbe, prohibiting the unlicensed 

entry of liquid crystal eWriters and 

components thereof that infringe claims 

1–5, 10, 11, 13–16, 18–23, 26, and 27 of 

the ’506 patent and/or claims 1, 2, 9–11, 

15–17, 21, and 22 of the ’604 patent and 

(2) an order that iQbe cease and desist 

from importing, selling, marketing, 

advertising, distributing, transferring 

(except for exportation), soliciting 

United States agents or distributors, and 

aiding or abetting other entities in the 

importation, sale for importation, sale 

after importation, transfer (except for 

exportation), or distribution of liquid 

crystal eWriters and components thereof 

that infringe claims 1–5, 10, 11, 13–16, 

18–23, 26, and 27 of the ’506 patent 

and/or claims 1, 2, 9–11, 15–17, 21, and 

22 of the ’604 patent. 

The Commission has determined that 

the public interest factors enumerated in 

section 337(g)(1), 19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1), 

do not preclude the issuance of the LEO 

or CDO. The Commission has 

determined that bonding at 100 percent 

of the entered value of the covered 

products is required during the period 

of Presidential review, 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). 

The Commission’s order and opinion 

were delivered to the President and the 

United States Trade Representative on 

the day of their issuance. 

The investigation is terminated. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 26, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–20939 Filed 9–28–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Receipt of Complaint; 

Solicitation of Comments Relating to 

the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has received a complaint 

entitled Certain Shaving Cartridges, 

Components Thereof and Products 

Containing Same, DN 3257; the 

Commission is soliciting comments on 

any public interest issues raised by the 

complaint or complainant’s filing 

pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 

20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The 

public version of the complaint can be 

accessed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov, 

and will be available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at United 

States International Trade Commission 

(USITC) at https://www.usitc.gov. The 

public record for this investigation may 

be viewed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission has received a complaint 

and a submission pursuant to § 210.8(b) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure filed on behalf of The 

Gillette Company LLC on September 25, 

2017. The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 

(19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into 

the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain shaving cartridges, components 

thereof and products containing same. 

The complaint names as respondents 

Edgewell Personal Care Company of 

Chesterfield, MO; Edgewell Personal 

Care Brands, LLC of Shelton, CT; 

Edgewell Personal Care, LLC of Shelton, 

CT; Schick Manufacturing, Inc. of 

Shelton, CT; and Schick (Guangzhou) 

Co., Limited of China. The complainant 

requests that the Commission issue a 

limited exclusion, cease and desist 

orders and impose a bond upon 

respondents’ alleged infringing articles 

during the 60-day Presidential review 

period pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). 

Proposed respondents, other 

interested parties, and members of the 

public are invited to file comments, not 

to exceed five (5) pages in length, 

inclusive of attachments, on any public 

interest issues raised by the complaint 

or § 210.8(b) filing. Comments should 

address whether issuance of the relief 

specifically requested by the 

complainant in this investigation would 

affect the public health and welfare in 

the United States, competitive 

conditions in the United States 

economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the requested 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2017 / Notices 45611 

1Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures: 

https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_

filing_procedures.pdf. 

2All contract personnel will sign appropriate 

nondisclosure agreements. 

3Electronic Document Information System 

(EDIS): https://edis.usitc.gov. 

remedial orders are used in the United 

States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the requested remedial 

orders; 

(iii) identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 

its licensees, or third parties make in the 

United States which could replace the 

subject articles if they were to be 

excluded; 

(iv) indicate whether complainant, 

complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

exclusion order and/or a cease and 

desist order within a commercially 

reasonable time; and 

(v) explain how the requested 

remedial orders would impact United 

States consumers. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business, eight 

calendar days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. There will be further 

opportunities for comment on the 

public interest after the issuance of any 

final initial determination in this 

investigation. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above and submit 8 true paper 

copies to the Office of the Secretary by 

noon the next day pursuant to § 210.4(f) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). 

Submissions should refer to the docket 

number (‘‘Docket No. 3257’’) in a 

prominent place on the cover page and/ 

or the first page. (See Handbook for 

Electronic Filing Procedures, Electronic 

Filing Procedures 1). Persons with 

questions regarding filing should 

contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All such requests 

should be directed to the Secretary to 

the Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All information, 

including confidential business 

information and documents for which 

confidential treatment is properly 

sought, submitted to the Commission for 

purposes of this Investigation may be 

disclosed to and used: (i) By the 

Commission, its employees and Offices, 

and contract personnel (a) for 

developing or maintaining the records 

of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in 

internal investigations, audits, reviews, 

and evaluations relating to the 

programs, personnel, and operations of 

the Commission including under 5 

U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 

government employees and contract 

personnel,2 solely for cybersecurity 

purposes. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection at the Office of the Secretary 

and on EDIS.3

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of §§ 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 25, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–20893 Filed 9–28–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—DVD Copy Control 

Association 

Notice is hereby given that, on August 

23, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 

National Cooperative Research and 

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), DVD Copy Control 

Association (‘‘DVD CCA’’) has filed 

written notifications simultaneously 

with the Attorney General and the 

Federal Trade Commission disclosing 

changes in its membership. The 

notifications were filed for the purpose 

of extending the Act’s provisions 

limiting the recovery of antitrust 

plaintiffs to actual damages under 

specified circumstances. Specifically, 

Ela ̈sser GmbH, Horb, GERMANY; 

NovoDisc Midia Digital Ltda, Sao Paulo, 

BRAZIL; Signature Media Services, 

Valencia, CA; and Zheijang Tianle 

Digital Electric, Shengzhou, Zhejiang, 

PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, have 

withdrawn as parties to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and DVD CCA 

intends to file additional written 

notifications disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its 

original notification pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on May 25, 2017. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on June 20, 2017 (82 FR 28093). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2017–20881 Filed 9–28–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Automotive 

Cybersecurity Industry Consortium 

Notice is hereby given that, on August 

23, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 

National Cooperative Research and 

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Automotive 

Cybersecurity Industry Consortium 

(‘‘ACIC’’) has filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Mazda Motor of America, 

Inc., Irvine, CA; American Honda Co., 

Inc., Torrance, CA; and Toyota Motor 

North America, Inc., Saline, MI, have 

been added as parties to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and ACIC intends 

to file additional written notifications 

disclosing all changes in membership. 

On January 11, 2017, ACIC filed its 

original notification pursuant to Section 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES