alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, EnricoCavatorta, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 20-F of Luxottica Group S.p.A.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

4.             The company’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)  Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated theeffectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed inthis report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The company’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a)  All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)  Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
|        | By:    | /s/ ENRICO CAVATORTA    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Enrico Cavatorta        |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

Dated: June 28, 2006

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3042 

To provide for low interest loans for small businesses in major disaster 

areas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2011 

Mr. BARLETTA (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. MARINO, Mr. KELLY, 

Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. WELCH, Mr. PITTS, and Mr. 

PLATTS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To provide for low interest loans for small businesses in 

major disaster areas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disaster Loan Fair5 ness Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IN GENERAL. 

7 When the president declares a major disaster under 

8 section 401 of the Stafford Act, the interest rates for any 

9 loan programs or loan guarantee under the Small BusiVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:26 Sep 28, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3042.IH H3042

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3042 IH

1 ness Act or the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, 

2 including Home Disaster Loans, Business Physical Dis3 aster Loans, and Economic Injury Disaster Loans, will be 

4 1 percent for eligible applicants in the disaster area, with 

5 or without credit available elsewhere. This rate shall apply 

6 for the duration of all loans under such programs made 

7 while that declaration is in effect. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc. (the
Company), certifies that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 2005 (the Report) of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of March 27, 2005 and for the
period then ended.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 11, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Frederick R. Hipp                
|Frederick R. Hipp                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer



51
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of 
Chief Executive Officer of 
Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.

I,
Malcolm M. Aslin, Chief Executive Officer of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.,
hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:

| |  |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| |  | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | (a.) | The
  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005,
  which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and                                  
|
| |  | (b.) | The
  information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
  period ended March 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification, fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.

Dated:  May 9, 2005.

| |     |                                        
| | --- | ---------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ MALCOLM M. ASLIN                   
| |     |                                        
| |     | Malcolm M.
  Aslin                     
| |     | President
  and Chief Executive Officer

31

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

                    Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules Of Procedure, as amended in October 2010, notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Concepts (SFFAC) 8,                     *Federal Financial Reporting.*

                    The Statement is available on the FASAB Web site at                     *http://www.fasab.gov/​accounting-standards/​.*                     Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director, 441 G Street NW., Mailstop 6H19, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

Authority:Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463.

Dated: September 22, 2017.

Wendy M. Payne,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2017-20675 Filed 9-26-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 12, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00151

- CV

S. H., Appellant

v.

The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFO RE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error requiri ng reversal in the trial

court’s decree of termination : IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the

trial court’s decree of termination is in all things affirmed. It FURTHER appearing to the Court

that appellant has filed an affidavit of in ability to pay costs, it is FURTHER ordered that no

costs of appeal be assessed against appellant; and that this decision be certified below

for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2897 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2897

To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  prevent the dissemination to the public of certain information with 
    respect to noncommercial flights of private aircraft owners and 
                               operators.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2011

  Mr. Pompeo (for himself, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Graves of 
  Missouri, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Ms. Jenkins, Mr. 
 Long, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Schock, Mr. Flores, Mr. 
 Huelskamp, Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois, and Mr. Barrow) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  prevent the dissemination to the public of certain information with 
    respect to noncommercial flights of private aircraft owners and 
                               operators.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``BARR Preservation Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISSEMINATION OF CERTAIN PRIVATE AIRCRAFT 
              REGISTRATION NUMBERS TO THE PUBLIC.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Federal Government's dissemination to the public of 
        information relating to a noncommercial flight carried out by a 
        private owner or operator of an aircraft, whether during or 
        following the flight, does not serve a public policy objective.
            (2) Upon the request of a private owner or operator of an 
        aircraft, the Federal Government should not disseminate to the 
        public information relating to noncommercial flights carried 
        out by that owner or operator, as the information should be 
        private and confidential.
    (b) Prohibition.--
            (1) In general.--Upon the request of a private owner or 
        operator of an aircraft, the Administrator of the Federal 
        Aviation Administration shall require that, with respect to the 
        noncommercial flights of that owner or operator, the display of 
        that owner or operator's aircraft registration number is 
        blocked in aircraft situational display data available to the 
        public.
            (2) Availability of information to government agencies.--
        Paragraph (1) does not affect the authority of the 
        Administrator to make aircraft registration numbers available 
        to Federal, State, or local government agencies.
                                 <all>
```
ADDENDUM TO
                           PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
                             DATED OCTOBER 31, 1995


     THIS ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 31, 1995 is made
and  entered  into  this  11th  day  of  March  1997,  by and  between  American
Registration Systems, Inc., an Indiana corporation ("ARS") and Image Technology,
Inc., a Nevada corporation ("ITI"), as follows:

     Paragraphs  3.1 and 6.2 are each amended by deleting  from each thereof the
date "May 1, 1997" and inserting in its place the date "May 1, 1999."

     Paragraphs 3.1 and 6.2 are each hereby further  amended to provide that ITI
shall have no payment obligation prior to May 1, 1998, and that ARS shall not be
entitled to place ITI in default with respect to such payment  obligation  prior
to May 1, 1998.

     All other terms and conditions of said Purchase and Sale  Agreement  remain
in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  hereto have caused this  Agreement to be
duly executed and delivered as of the date and year first above written.

AMERICAN REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,           IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Nevada
INC., an Indiana corporation             corporation


By:__________________________            By:_____________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001015551
<NAME>                        Sprint Spectrum L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                         67,200
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                   9,000
<INVENTORY>                                    96,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               391,000
<PP&E>                                         3,384,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 251,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,961,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,327,500
<BONDS>                                        3,101,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,478,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,961,300
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               235,500
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,534,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             113,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,407,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,407,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,407,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0380 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SERENITY ALANA MANN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 26 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 19 2024

01/19/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0380
<PAGE>   1

                                                        EXHIBIT 23.1


                Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-42634) pertaining to the Employee
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8 No. 33-72614)
pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8 No. 
33-99164) pertaining to the SIG Holdings, Inc. 1992 Long-Term
Incentive Plan, and (Form S-3 No. 33-77028) and in the related
Prospectus pertaining to the Shelf Registration of securities of
Delphi Financial Group, Inc. of our report dated February 10,
1997 with resepct to the consolidated financial statements and
schedules of Delphi Financial Group, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 5, 1997
#### Robert E. MILLER, Appellant v. *Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security. *(Pursuant to Rule 43(c), F.R.A.P.).

No. 07-2975.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) May 20, 2008.

Filed May 29, 2008.

Christine M. Nebel, Esq., Butler, PA, for Appellant.

Quinn N. Doggett, Esq., Social Security Administration, Philadelphia, PA, for Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner Social Security.

BEFORE: SMITH and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges, and STAFFORD,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable William H. Stafford, Jr., Senior District Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Robert E. Miller applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The ALJ found that Miller was not disabled under the Social Security Act because the Appeals Council denied his request for review, and the ALJ’s decision became the final decision of the Commissioner. The District Court rejected Miller’s appeal. We will affirm.

On appeal, Miller challenges the District Court’s legal conclusions and the ALJ’s factual findings regarding his disability. We agree with the District Court and will adopt its reasoning as set forth in its thorough opinion. There was substantial evidence in the record to support the ALJ’s *143conclusion that Miller’s abdominal tumor, appendectomy and obesity were not severe impairments. *See Fargnoli v. Massanari,*247 F.3d 34, 38 (3d Cir.2001). Further, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the ALJ’s finding that there was no spinal disorder resulting in the compression of a nerve root or the spinal cord. The ALJ properly considered, discussed and weighed the relevant evidence pertaining to Miller’s disability allegations. The ALJ examined reports from Miller’s treating physician and medical center as well as from consultative examiners. The ALJ discussed Miller’s history, symptoms, and treatment for each condition. Our review shows that the ALJ accorded great weight to the opinions of the treating doctors.

Further, although Miller takes issue with a discrepancy between the Vocational Expert’s testimony and the examples of jobs the ALJ found he could perform, there is substantial evidence to support the finding that Miller is able to perform a limited range of sedentary work and that such work exists in the national economy. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 423(d)(2)(A), 1382c(a)(3)(B); *see also Jones v. Barnhart,*364 F.3d 501, 505-06 (3d Cir.2004).1

Finally, the ALJ’s RFC finding is also supported by substantial evidence and the hypothetical question posed to the Vocational Expert accurately reflected Miller’s established physical impairments. *See Burns v. Barnhart,*312 F.3d 113, 123 (3d Cir.2002).

For the reasons set forth above, we will affirm the final order of the District Court.

1

. We note that Dr. Kasdan, Miller's treating physician, opined that Miller could perform light work. The ALJ gave Miller the benefit of the doubt and found that he could only perform sedentary work.