alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                             AVAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                         Pursuant to Section 242 of the
                         General Corporation Law of the
                                State of Delaware

                AVAX Technologies, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify
as follows:

                1. The name of the Corporation is AVAX Technologies, Inc.

                2. The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, as
heretofore amended, is hereby amended as follows:

                3. Article 4(A)(1) is hereby amended as follows:

                "FOURTH: (A)(1) The aggregate number of shares which the
Corporation shall have authority to issue is Thirty Five Million (35,000,000),
of which Five Million (5,000,000) shares, having a par value of $.01 per share,
shall be designated `Preferred Stock' and Thirty Million (30,000,000) shares,
having a par value of $.004 per share, shall be designated `Common Stock.'"

                4. The foregoing amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

                5. This Certificate of Amendment and the amendment provided for
herein shall become effective at, and not until, 5:00 p.m. (New York time) on
June 3, 1998.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AVAX Technologies, Inc. has caused this
Certificate of Amendment to be signed this 3rd day of June, 1998.


                                         AVAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                                         By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Jonas, M.D.
                                             --------------------------
                                             Name: Jeffrey M. Jonas, M.D.
                                             Title: President and Chief
                                                    Executive Officer
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of C.H. and L.H

., children * From the 3 26th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 10989

- CX

.

No. 11

- 2 4

- 00 076

- C V * September 19 , 20 2 4

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey

, C. J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that th ere is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the

order of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Meredith Enterprises, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allen K. Meredith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |                   |                                                                                                       
|------------------- | ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 25, 2004 Date |                   | /s/ Allen K. Meredith                                                                                 
|                    | Allen K. Meredith
|                    |                   | Chairman of the Board of Directors President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
exhibit_4-5.htm










Exhibit 4.5


 


[CONSIDER IF TO ADD LOGO]


 


Magal Security Systems Ltd.


P.O. Box 70, Industrial Zone


Yehud 56100, Israel







[           ]


 


To Securities Dealers, Commercial Banks, Trust Companies, and Other Nominees:


 


This letter is being distributed to securities dealers, commercial banks, trust companies and other nominees in connection with the offering by Magal Security Systems Ltd. (“Magal”) of an aggregate of [   ] ordinary shares, par value NIS 1.0, of Magal (“Ordinary Shares”) at a subscription price of $[   ] per Ordinary Share (the “Subscription Price”), pursuant to the exercise of non-transferable subscription rights initially distributed on [                       ] (“Subscription Rights”), to all holders of record of Ordinary Shares of Magal as of the close of business on [     ] (the “Record Date”).  The Subscription Rights are described in the enclosed prospectus and evidenced by a Subscription Certificate registered in your name or in the name of your nominee.


 


Each beneficial owner of Ordinary Shares registered in your name or the name of your nominee is entitled to one Subscription Right for each [___] Ordinary Share[s] owned by such beneficial owner on the Record Date (the “Basic Subscription Rights”).  Each Subscription Right also carries the right to oversubscribe at the Subscription Price for additional Ordinary Shares (subject to proration if necessary) up to the total amount of Ordinary Shares remaining upon completion of the Basic Subscription Rights (defined below).  Holders of Ordinary Shares will not receive fractional Subscription Rights, but instead Subscription Rights will be rounded down to the nearest whole number.


 


We are asking you to contact your clients for whom you hold Ordinary Shares registered in your name or in the name of your nominee as of the Record Date to obtain instructions with respect to the Subscription Rights.


 


Enclosed are copies of the following documents:


 



	
  

	
1.

	
Prospectus;







 



	
  

	
2.

	
Subscription Certificate;







 



	
  

	
3.

	
Instructions as to Use of Subscription Certificates;







 



	
  

	
4.

	
Form of Notice to Shareholders who are Record Holders;







 



	
  

	
5.

	
Form of Beneficial Owner Election Form; and







 



	
  

	
6.

	
Form of Nominee Holder Certification.







 


Your prompt action is requested.  The Subscription Rights will expire at 5:00 P.M., Eastern Time, on [                       ], (the “Expiration Date”).


 


To exercise Subscription Rights, properly completed and executed Subscription Certificates and payment in full for all Subscription Rights exercised must be delivered to the Subscription Agent as indicated in the prospectus prior to the Expiration Date.


 


Additional copies of the enclosed materials may be obtained by contacting us at +972-+972-3- 5391490.


 




	 	 	
Very truly yours,

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	MAGAL SECURITY SYSTEMS LTD.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.53


Princeton Dental Management Corporation
7421 West 100th Place
Bridgeview, IL 60455

Re: LOAN TO COVER OPERATING EXPENSES

Gentlemen:

         As discussed, the undersigned has agreed to make a loan to  Princeton
Dental Management Corporation ("PDMC") on the following terms:

         1. Principal Amount of Loan. The loan shall be in a principal amount
of not less than $175,000.00 and not more than $200,000.00, it being the
intention of the parties that the undersigned shall loan PDMC the amount
necessary to cover certain PDMC operating expenses through December 31, 1996.

         2. Interest Rate. 1.0% over the Prime Rate, as such rate may be set by
NBD/First National Bank of Chicago.

         3. Fees. There shall be a fee of $4,000.00 added to the principal
amount of the loan as a fee.

         4. Term. The parties understand that it is essential that PDMC have
readily available funds in place in order to pay certain operating expenses
prior to the December 31, 1996 deadline, and the parties agree to structure the
timing of the loan accordingly. The loan shall be repaid upon receipt from
Southland Life Insurance Company ("Southland") of certain reinsurance proceeds.

         5. Security. PDMC shall use its best efforts and cooperate in every
regard to consent to and facilitate an assignment of certain reinsurance
proceeds from Southland to the undersigned as security for the loan.

         If this reflects your understanding please sign where indicated.

Dickerson Investment Group, Inc.

By:
    ----------------------------
  Its:
       -------------------------

AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

Princeton Dental Management Corporation

By:
    ----------------------------------
    Frank Leonard Laport, CEO
**Exhibit 12(b)**
**302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Richard Solomons, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 3, 2005 By:  /s/ Richard Solomons    Name:  Richard Solomons    Title:  Finance Director
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: May 12, 2016 521744

________________________________ In the Matter of JORDAN Y. CORP, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT DONALD VENETTOZZI, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: March 29, 2016 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Lynch and Aarons, JJ.

__________ Jordan Y. Corp, Marcy, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with using drugs after his urine twice tested positive for buprenorphine. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.-2- 521744

We confirm. The misbehavior report, urinalysis test results and related documentation and the testimony of the testing officer provide substantial evidence to support the determination (see Matter of Martinez v Annucci, 134 AD3d 1380, 1380-1381 [2015]; Matter of Green v Annucci, 134 AD3d 1376, 1376 [2015]). With regard to petitioner's contentions that an incorrect identification number appeared on the testing documentation, the testimony of the testing officer adequately explained that the error in the last digit of petitioner's identification number was a typographical error, which he corrected on the documentation (see Matter of Smith v Unger, 100 AD3d 1171, 1171 [2012]). Insofar as petitioner claims that the sample tested was not his, the testing officer confirmed that he had collected the urine sample from petitioner, which petitioner admitted providing, and the officer's testimony established the chain of custody and positive results for that sample and that it belonged to petitioner (see id.; see also Matter of Jenkins v Annucci, 136 AD3d 1093, 1093 [2016]; Matter of Martinez v Annucci, 134 AD3d at 1381). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and determined to lack merit. Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Lynch and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Western Gas Resources, Inc.

|Name of Subsidiary                                                |  | Relationship                                           
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|1) MIGC, Inc., a Delaware corporation                             |  | Wholly owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc. 
|2) MGTC, Inc., a Wyoming corporation                              |  | Wholly owned subsidiary of MIGC, Inc.                  
|3) Western Gas ResourcesTexas, Inc., a Texas corporation         |  | Wholly owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc. 
|4) Mountain Gas Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation           |  | Wholly owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc. 
|5) Western Power Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation           |  | Wholly owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc. 
|6) WGR Canada, Inc., a New Brunswick corporation                  |  | Wholly owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc. 
|7) Lance Oil & Gas Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation          |  | Wholly owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc. 
|8) Mountain Gas Transportation, Inc., a Delaware corporation      |  | Wholly owned subsidiary of Mountain Gas Resources, Inc.
|9) Western Gas Wyoming, L.L.C., a Wyoming L.L.C.                  |  | Wholly owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc. 
|10) Western Gas ResourcesWestana, Inc., a Delaware corporation   |  | Wholly owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc. 
|11) Western Gas ResourcesSand Wash, Inc., a Colorado corporation |  | Wholly owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc. 



QuickLinks
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2022

- 356 9

_____________________________
J OSIAH M ILES A NDERSEN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. John F. Simon, Jr. , Judge

. April 22, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. O STERHAUS , C.J., and B ILBREY and N ORDBY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine R

. Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,660
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,741
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (147)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,797
<PP&E>                                           4,474
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,040)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,348
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           194
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,144
<SALES>                                         37,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,970
<CGS>                                           32,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,151)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,569)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (1,582)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,151)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.38)


</TABLE>
[948 NYS2d 820]

#### One Pleasantville Road, LLC, Respondent-Appellant, v Pleasantville Food and Gas, Inc., Appellant-Respondent. Dakhil El Jamal, Nonparty Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department, 9th and 10th Judicial Districts,

April 27, 2012

*31APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Law Offices of Robert G. Del Gadio,*East Meadow *(Robert G. Del Gadio*of counsel), for respondent-appellant. *Law Offices of Albert J. Pirro, Jr.,*White Plains *(Albert J. Pirro, Jr.,*of counsel), for appellant-respondent and nonparty appellant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the appeal and cross appeal from the decision are dismissed as no appeal lies from a decision (UJCA 1702; *see Greenfield v Tassinari,*8 AD3d 529 [2004]); and it is further, ordered that so much of the appeal from the final judgment as is by nonparty Dakhil El Jamal is dismissed, as he is not aggrieved thereby *(see*CPLR 5511); and it is further, ordered that the final judgment is reversed, without costs, and the petition is dismissed.

After the expiration of a five-year “Retail Gasoline Station Lease Agreement and Lessee Commission Contract,” landlord, a distributor of motor fuels *(see*General Business Law § 199-a  ), served tenant, a dealer *(see*General Business Law § 199-a  ), with a 30-day notice to quit. Upon tenant’s failure to vacate the premises, landlord commenced this holdover summary proceeding. A nonjury trial was held, at which tenant asserted, among other things, that landlord had failed to comply with article 11-B of the General Business Law, entitled “Franchises for the Sale of Motor Fuels,” and, in particular, with General Business Law § 199-c (3), which requires that a distributor provide a dealer with 90 days’ written notice of its intent not to renew a franchise. The Justice Court held that General Business Law article 11-B is beyond the scope of a summary proceeding and found that landlord was entitled to possession and use and occupancy. A final judgment was entered awarding landlord possession and the sum of $42,252.85.

Contrary to landlord’s argument, the relationship between the parties was a franchise, as that term is defined in General Business Law § 199-a (3), since the agreement between them granted tenant the right to occupy or use a premises leased by landlord for the purpose of engaging in the retail sale of motor *32fuels supplied by landlord. Since the lease and franchise agreements are part of an integrated business relationship (see *Shell Oil Co. v Marinello,*63 NJ 402 [1973]), landlord’s failure to give tenant 90 days’ written notice of its intent not to renew the franchise requires the dismissal of the petition (see *Power Test Petroleum Distribs. v Ifzal,*130 Misc 2d 137 [1985]).

In view of the foregoing, we need not consider the parties’ remaining contentions. Accordingly, the final judgment is reversed and the petition is dismissed.

LaCava and Iannacci, JJ., concur; Nicolai, P.J., taking no part.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6687

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GARLIN RAYMOND FARRIS, a/k/a G,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cr-00099-RJC-DCK-1)

Submitted: October 13, 2022 Decided: October 18, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Garlin Raymond Farris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6687 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/18/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Garlin Raymond Farris appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. 

P. 33 motion and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. 

United States v. Farris, No. 3:18-cr-00099-RJC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C. May 20, 2022; June 7, 

2022). We deny Farris’ motion to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6687 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/18/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
# United State s Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 10-2393 JASON SPOONER, Plaintiff, Appellee,

v. EEN, INC. AND DAN EGAN, Defendants, Appellants.

___________________ ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on July 5, 2011 is corrected as follows: On page 13, line 10, change "note 1" to "note 2"