alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001015551
<NAME>                        Sprint Spectrum L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         50,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                   200
<INVENTORY>                                    72,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,000
<PP&E>                                         1,418,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 9,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,898,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          981,000
<BONDS>                                        686,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,215,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,898,800
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,200
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  360,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (438,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (438,600)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (438,600)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
----

|   | 1) | the      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September      30, 2009 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section      13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;    and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated  | November      13, 2009 |   |                         |
|--------|------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |                   |   |                         |
|   |                   | By:    | /s/ Neil S. Wechsler         |
|   |                   |   | Neil      S. Wechsler        |
|   |                   |   | Co-Chairman      and         |
|   |                   |   | Chief      Executive Officer |

----
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, D.C. KING, J.P. ELLINGTON

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DAVID K. BARWICK

CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201400387

GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 20 June 2014.

Military Judge: Maj Michael D. Zimmerman, USMC .

Convening Authority: Commanding General, 3d Marine Aircraft 

Wing, Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, San Diego, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: Col D.K. Margolin, 

USMC.

For Appellant: CAPT Tierney Carlos, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

27 January 2015

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Change of Control Severence Plan



 Exhibit 10.24 

 

 

 SCHEDULE I 
 CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN PARTICIPANTS 
 Benefit Level - 3

  

							
		  	Baxter, Warner L.	  	Moehn, Michael	  	
		  	Cisel, Scott A.	  	Naslund, Charles D.	  	
		  	Cole, Daniel F.	  	Nelson, Gregory L.	  	
		  	Heflin, Adam C.	  	Sullivan, Steven R.	  	
		  	Lyons, Martin J.	  	Voss, Thomas R.	  	
		  	Mark, Richard J.	  		  	

 Benefit Level - 2 

 

							
		  	Barnes, Lynn M.	  	Nelson, Craig D.	  	
		  	Birdsong, Jerre E.	  	Ogden, Stan E.	  	
		  	Birk, Mark C.	  	Pate, Ron D.	  	
		  	Borkowski, Maureen A.	  	Power, Joseph M.	  	
		  	Brawley, Mark	  	Reasoner, Cleveland O. *	  	
		  	DeGraw, Kevin	  	Schepers, David J.	  	
		  	Diya, Fadi M.	  	Schukar, Shawn E.	  	
		  	Foss, Karen C.	  	Serri, Andrew M.	  	
		  	Glaeser, Scott A.	  	Sobule, James A.	  	
		  	Heger, Mary P. *	  	Steinke, Bruce A.	  	
		  	Iselin, Christopher A.	  	Wakeman, David N. *	  	
		  	Kidwell, Stephen M.	  	Weisenborn, Dennis W.	  	
		  	Lindgren, Mark C.	  	Wiseman, D. Scott *	  	
		  	Menne, Michael L.	  	Wood, Warren T. *	  	
		  	Mueller, Michael G.	  		  	

  

	*	Not eligible for excise tax gross-up provisions 

  

									
	Approved by:	 	 /s/ Patrick T. Stokes
	 		 	Date:	 	 December 9, 2010


 Patrick T. Stokes, Chairman, For the Human Resources Committee
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2735 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the lookthrough treatment of payments between related controlled foreign corporations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2011 

Mr. BOUSTANY (for himself and Mr. KIND) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the look-through treatment of payments between related controlled foreign corporations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LOOK-THROUGH TREATMENT OF PAYMENTS 

4 BETWEEN RELATED CONTROLLED FOREIGN 

5 CORPORATIONS MADE PERMANENT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (C) of section 

7 954(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend8 ed by striking ‘‘and before January 1, 2012,’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2735 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years of foreign corpora3 tions beginning after December 31, 2011, and to taxable 

4 years of United States shareholders with or within which 

5 such taxable years of foreign corporations end. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANY SET FORTH IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,354
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,622
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,940
<PP&E>                                         632,866
<DEPRECIATION>                                 216,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 458,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,094
<BONDS>                                         98,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           233
<OTHER-SE>                                     246,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   458,491
<SALES>                                         76,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,860
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,535
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,660
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,660
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Education Technology,
Inc. (the "Company") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Liena Fu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
that:
 
 *   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 *   information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Liena
Fu
 Liena
Fu
 Chief
Financial Officer, Controller
 
 November
18, 2009
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### David M. KISSI, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Richard M. KREMEN, Defendant—Appellee, and DK&R Company, Debtor—Appellee.

No. 06-1120.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 28, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 4, 2006.

David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se. Maria Ellena Chavez-Ruark, DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary, US LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

David M. Kissi appeals the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying his amended motion to reconsider an award of compensation and expenses to the trustee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Kissi v. Kremen,*Nos. 1:05-cv-2414-PJM; 1:05-cv-03458-PJM; 1:05-cv-02641-PJM (D.Md. Dec. 12, 2005). We deny Kissi’s motions for a change of venue, to consolidate cases, and to remand, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Elijah SHEPPARD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Pete GEREN, Secretary of the Army; James B. Peake, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 08-1286.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 19, 2008.

Decided: June 23, 2008.

Elijah Sheppard, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin J. Mikolashek, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elijah Sheppard appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action seeking review of a Department of Veteran’s Affairs decision on his application for benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Sheppard v. Geren,*No. 1:07-cv-01279-CMH-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 19 *&*entered Feb. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                  DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company of Texas (Incorporated in Texas), a
subsidiary of Delphi Financial Group, Inc.

Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Incorporated in Illinois), a
subsidiary of Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company of Texas.

First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Incorporated in New York), a
subsidiary of Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.

SIG Holdings, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

Safety National Casualty Corporation (Incorporated in Missouri), a subsidiary of
SIG Holdings, Inc.

Safety National Re (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands), a subsidiary of Safety
National Casualty Corporation

RSL Investors, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

Chestnut Investors II, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi
Financial Group, Inc.

Chestnut Investors III, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi
Financial Group, Inc.

Chestnut Investors IV, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi
Financial Group, Inc.

DFG II Corporation (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

DFG Corporation (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of DFG II Corporation.

APDEL LLC (Organized in Delaware), a subsidiary of DFG II Corporation and
Chestnut Investors IV, Inc.

Delphi Capital Management, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of
Delphi Financial Group, Inc.

RSL Marketing, Inc. (Incorporated in Nevada), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

Delphi Brokerage Company (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi
Financial Group, Inc.

Delphi Funding L.L.C. (Organized in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SAMUEL BENJAMIN KELLY, a/k/a Tiz, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:94-cr-00163-RBS-4) Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 28, 2008 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Benjamin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Samuel Benjamin Kelly appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) for a reduction of sentence and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kelly , No. 2:94-cr-00163-RBS4 (E.D. Va. Filed Apr. 9, entered Apr. 10, 2008; filed May 8, entered May 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

#### Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Co., Inc. v. Robert Sills and Quality Moving & Storage Co., Inc.

October 29, 1979

Case No. (Law) 5236

By JUDGE ALBERT H. GRENADIER

The Court has read with interest the memoranda submitted by counsel on the issue of whether this appeal from the General District Court brings the entire case and all of the defendants before this Court or only that portion of the case as affects the party defendant prosecuting the appeal.

This issue has never been squarely decided in Virginia. However, pertinent language from several Virginia cases concerning such appeals would tend to indicate that the appeal and subsequent trial de novo involves the entire case and all of the parties. In *Addison*v. *Salyer,*185 Va. 644 (1946), the Court said:

> An appeal, properly perfected, transfers the entire record to the Circuit Court for a retrial as though originally brought therein. The judgment of the trial justice is completely annulled by the appeal and is not thereafter effective for any purpose. When an appeal is taken by either party, its effect is not only to suspend, but to destroy the effect of a judgment of a justice. It makes it as though no judgment had been rendered. The case is considered as still *490pending, no regard is had to the judgment of the justice, and the rights of the parties are the same as they would be in any other suit pending in the courts of record.

Even if an appeal does not automatically bring the entire case and all of the parties into the Circuit Court, the Circuit Court has inherent power to order the same. This conclusion is drawn from the following language in *Overnight Transportation Company*v. Barnett, 217 Va. 222 (1976):

> Code 16.1-114 affords the Circuit Court full power to control the course of appeals. This Code section provides that the Court "shall retain [an appealed case], with full power . . . to enter such orders and direct such proceedings as will tend. . . to promote substantial justice to all parties, and to bring about a trial on the merits of the controversy.

To sustain the position of the defendants that the defendant Sills is relieved from further participation in this case would, in the opinion of the Court, hinder a full trial on the merits of the controversy and would not tend to promote substantial justice for all parties concerned.

Accordingly, it is the ruling of the Court that both remaining defendants are before the Court on this appeal.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                             LIDAK PHARMACEUTICALS,
                            A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

Gerald J. Yakatan, Ph.D. and Gregory P. Hanson certify that:

        1. They are the President and CEO; and V.P., Finance, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary, respectively, of LIDAK Pharmaceuticals (the
"Corporation").

        2. ARTICLE 1 of the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation is
hereby restated to read as follows:

                                   "ARTICLE 1

        The name of the corporation is AVANIR Pharmaceuticals (the
"Corporation")."

        3. The foregoing amendment of the Articles of Incorporation has been
duly approved by the Corporation's Board of Directors.

        4. The foregoing amendment of the Articles of Incorporation has been
duly approved by a vote of the shareholders of the Corporation in accordance
with Section 902 of the California Corporations Code. The total number of
outstanding shares of the Corporation entitled to vote with respect to the
amendment was 39,814,017 shares of Class A Common Stock (one vote per share),
and 49,000 shares of Class B Common Stock (five votes per share). Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock voted together as Common Stock with respect to
the foregoing amendment. The number of shares voting in favor of the amendment
equaled or exceeded the vote required. The percentage vote required was more
than 50% of the votes entitled to be cast.

        We further declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State
of California, that the matters set forth in this Certificate of Amendment of
the Articles of Incorporation of LIDAK Pharmaceuticals are true and correct of
our own knowledge.

        Executed at San Diego, California on this 20th day of November, 1998.


                                     /s/ Gerald J. Yakatan
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Gerald J. Yakatan, Ph.D., President and CEO


                                     /s/ Gregory P. Hanson
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Gregory P. Hanson, V.P., Finance, Chief
                                     Financial Officer and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20410]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION


Projects Approved for Minor Modifications

AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists the minor modifications approved for a 
previously approved project by the Susquehanna River Basin Commission 
during the period set forth in DATES.

DATES: July 1-31, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 North Front Street, 
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel, 
telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax: (717) 238-2436; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f353026333a2d1f2c2d3d3c71313a2b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a000513060f182a1918080944040f1e">[email protected]</span></a>. Regular mail inquiries may be sent to the above 
address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice lists previously approved 
projects, receiving approval of minor modifications, described below, 
pursuant to 18 CFR 806.18 for the time period specified above:

Minor Modifications Issued Under 18 CFR 806.18

1. SWEPI LP, Docket No. 20161218-1, Deerfield Township, Tioga County, 
Pa.; approval to change the design of the surface water intake with 
respect to intake location; Approval Date: July 14, 2017.

    Authority: Pub. L. 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., 18 CFR parts 
806, 807, and 808.

    Dated: September 20, 2017.
Stephanie L. Richardson,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-20410 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7040-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>