alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>      5 
<LEGEND>     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
             FROM THE ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
             IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
       
<S>                                        <C>          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      41,621,518   4,996,354
<SECURITIES>                                         0           0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,266,153   6,919,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0           0
<INVENTORY>                                          0           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,402,104  23,196,778
<PP&E>                                      16,006,468  15,334,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              77,625,564  43,349,941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,820,043  9,821,817
<BONDS>                                              0           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0           0
<PREFERRED>                                          0           0
<COMMON>                                         1,578       1,357
<OTHER-SE>                                  63,702,545  33,086,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                77,625,564  43,349,941
<SALES>                                     22,827,801  14,632,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,827,801  14,632,167
<CGS>                                       14,658,068  11,058,139
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,658,068  11,058,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,209,047  21,026,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,402,455) (7,872,153)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,402,455) (7,872,153)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0           0
<CHANGES>                                            0           0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,402,455) (7,872,153)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   ($0.36)     ($0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   ($0.36)     ($0.57)
<FN>
<F1> EPS-Basic and EPS-Diluted for previously reported periods has 
    been restated to comply with SFAS 128.
         

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000857507
<NAME>                        ENEX 88-89INCOME AND RETIREMENT FUND-SERIES 3,L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         9079
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19288
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28367
<PP&E>                                         1011033
<DEPRECIATION>                                 956565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 82835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          36418
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     46417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   82835
<SALES>                                        63231
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               63231
<CGS>                                          11149
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               13716
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   38366
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Millennium
Healthcare Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony Urbano, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|/s/ Anthony Urbano      |  | Date:   April 15,
    2015
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Anthony Urbano          |  |                           
|Chief Financial Officer |  |
Amendment to Employment Agreement - Joseph H. Smith



 Exhibit 10.25 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Employment Agreement
(this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of February 21, 2008, by and among John L. Bishop (“Executive”) and Cepheid, a California corporation (the “Company”).

 R E C I T A L S 
 A. The Company and Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated January 24, 2007. All capitalized terms set forth herein shall (unless otherwise defined herein) have the meanings
given to them in the Agreement. 
 B. The Company and Executive wish to clarify the terms of Section 9 of the Agreement by
means of this Amendment to the Agreement. 
 A G R E E M E N T 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: 
 1. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT. The first sentence of Section 9 of the Agreement entitled “Separation Benefits” is hereby amended to insert the phrase “any earned but unpaid
bonus,” such that it shall read in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “Upon termination of your employment with
Cepheid for any reason, you will receive payment for all unpaid salary, any earned but unpaid bonus, reimbursements and PTO accrued to the date of your termination of employment; and your benefits will be continued under Cepheid’s then existing
benefit plans and policies for so long as provided under the terms of such plans and policies and as required by applicable law.” 
 2. NO OTHER AMENDMENTS. Except as expressly set forth above, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 

3. GOVERNING LAW. This Amendment will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without
giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of laws. 
 4. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed in
any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered will be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

 

					
	COMPANY:	 		 	EXECUTIVE:
			
	 /s/ Joseph Smith
	 		 	 /s/ John Bishop

	By: Joseph Smith	 		 	John Bishop
	Its: Senior Vice President and General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report
of Winton Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Bollin, President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                  /s/ Robert L. Bollin
                                  ---------------------------------------
                                  Robert L. Bollin
                                  President (Chief Executive Officer)
October 5, 2004
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 2144** 

DEMARK DIXON , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. MR. TOM RAMIREZ, US Probation Officer, acting in his own individual capacity, but under color of Federal Authority; HALLS AUTOMOTIVE, LLC , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:12

- cv - 00137

- RAJ

- TEM )

Submitted : January 14, 2013 Decided: February 12, 2013

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. DeMark Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Lynn Van Valkenburg, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Randall Clair Lenhart, Jr., KALBAUGH, PFUND & MESSERSMITH, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: DeMark Dixon appeals the district court ’ s order s dismissing his complaint for failing to stat e a claim and denying his Rule 60(b) motion . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dixon v. Ramirez , No. 2:12

- cv - 00137

- RAJ

- TEM (E.D. Va. July 18, 2012; Oct. 1, 2012 )
. We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research Committee.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research Committee.                    

*Date:*                         October 19-20, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         James T. Snyder, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities/Room 3G31B National Institutes of Health, NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane MSC 9834, Bethesda, MD 20892-9834, (240) 669-5060,                         *james.snyder@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 20, 2017.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-20493 Filed 9-25-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Telex Communications Intermediate
Holdings, LLC and Telex Communications, Inc. (collectively, the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), Raymond V.
Malpocher, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Gregory W. Richter, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company as of December 31, 2005.



/s/ Raymond V. Malpocher
-------------------------------------------
Raymond V. Malpocher
President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated: March 24, 2006



/s/ Gregory W. Richter
-------------------------------------------
Gregory W. Richter
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dated: March 24, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4963

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL EARL LITTLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(CR-04-147)

Submitted: August 11, 2006 Decided: September 1, 2006

 

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Meetze, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Florence,

South Carolina, for Appellant. Jonathan S. Gasser, Acting United

States Attorney, Rose Mary Parham, Assistant United States

Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*Moreover, Little has conceded in his supplemental brief, and

the plea hearing transcript confirms, that statements he made at

the guilty plea hearing constituted admissions of facts such that

no Sixth Amendment error occurred at sentencing.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Earl Little pled guilty pursuant to a plea

agreement to possession of a firearm by a previously convicted

felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000). The district

court sentenced Little to seventy-two months’ imprisonment under

the then-mandatory sentencing guidelines. The sentencing court

also imposed an alternative sentence, pursuant to United States v.

Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir.) (order), opinion issued by 381

F.3d 316 (4th Cir. 2004) (en banc), vacated, 543 U.S. 1097 (2005),

on remand, 405 F.3d 1034 (4th Cir. 2005). Little appeals,

contending his sentence violated United States v. Booker, 543 U.S.

220 (2005).

The Sixth Amendment error in this case, if any, was

harmless because the district court imposed an identical

alternative sentence in accordance with Hammoud. See United

States v. Shatley, 448 F.3d 264, 267 (4th Cir. 2006).* The

district court’s alternative sentence was within the range

recommended by the sentencing guidelines, and this court takes the

district court at its word when it states it would impose the same

sentence under the advisory guideline system. See id. at 267-68.

Therefore, we presume the district court properly considered the
- 3 -

sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.A § 3553(a) (West 2000 &

Supp. 2005), as required by United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540,

546-56 (4th Cir. 2005); United States v. Green, 436 F.3d 449 (4th

Cir.) cert denied., 126 S. Ct. 2309 (2006); and United States v.

Moreland, 437 F.3d 424 (4th Cir. 2006). Shatley, 448 F.3d at 268.

Furthermore, we conclude the sentence was reasonable. See Green,

436 F.3d at 457.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district

court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### SECOND-79TH ST. COMPANY, a limited partnership, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 4, 1958.

Abraham Engelman, New York City, for plaintiff.

White & Case, New York City, for defendant.

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff has moved, under Rule 39(b), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., to be relieved of a waiver of jury trial by reason of a failure to make a timely demand as required by Rule 38, or in the alternative for an order under Rule 41(a) (2), permitting it to discontinue the action without prejudice.

The action was commenced in the Supreme Court of New York, New York County, and removed by defendant to this court on the ground of diversity of citizenship. The basis for the motion is the plaintiff’s inadvertent failure to demand a trial by jury within 10 days after the service of the defendant’s answer. But it is well settled that the mere statement of oversight or inadvertence does not suffice to invoke the discretion of the court. See 5 Moore’s Federal Practice § 39.09, p. 719. Nor does the fact that the action was commenced in a state court and removed by the defendant alter that principle. Swindells v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co., D.C., 15 F.R.D. 389; Strom v. Anderson, D.C., 14 F.R.D. 240. And while plaintiff in this suit for breach of contract wants to try the case to a jury, it does not appear that the issues *99involved are peculiarly susceptible to a jury’s determination, or that a trial to the court would be in any way inappropriate. It is the policy in this district that a party will not be relieved from a waiver of jury trial except under highly exceptional circumstances, see Mason v. British Overseas Airways Corporation, D.C., 20 F.R.D. 213, 214, and no such circumstances are apparent here.

The motion under Rule 39 (b) will be denied, and by the same token, the motion under Rule 41(a) (2), directed toward obtaining the same relief, will be denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2930 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2930

To amend the securities laws to provide for registration exemptions for 
        certain crowdfunded securities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 2011

 Mr. McHenry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the securities laws to provide for registration exemptions for 
        certain crowdfunded securities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Entrepreneur Access to Capital 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CROWDFUNDING EXEMPTION.

    (a) Securities Act of 1933.--Section 4 of the Securities Act of 
1933 (15 U.S.C. 77d) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) transactions involving the issuance of securities for 
        which--
                    ``(A) the aggregate annual amount raised through 
                the issue of the securities is $5,000,000 or less; and
                    ``(B) individual investments in the securities are 
                limited to an aggregate annual amount equal to the 
                lesser of--
                            ``(i) $10,000; and
                            ``(ii) 10 percent of the investor's annual 
                        income.''.
    (b) Verification of Income.--For purposes of section 4(6) of the 
Securities Act of 1933, an issuer may rely on certifications provided 
by investors.

SEC. 3. EXCLUSION OF CROWDFUNDING INVESTORS FROM SHAREHOLDER CAP.

    Section 12(g)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 
78l(g)(5)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``For the purposes'' and inserting:
                    ``(A) In general.--For the purposes''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Exclusion for persons holding certain 
                securities.--For purposes of this subsection, the term 
                `held of record' shall not include holders of 
                securities issued pursuant to transactions described 
                under section 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933.''.

SEC. 4. PREEMPTION OF STATE LAW.

    Section 18(b)(4) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 
77r(b)(4)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as (D) and 
        (E), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:
                    ``(C) section 4(6);''.
                                 <all>
```