alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      31.1RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)
      CERTIFICATIONS





I,
      Guoqiang Zhan, certify that:





1.I
      have reviewed this Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2008 of Envirosafe
      Corporation (the "registrant").





2.Based
      on my knowledge, this report does
      not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under
      which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
      covered by this report;





3.Based
      on my knowledge, the financial
      statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
      present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations
      and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;





4.The
      registrant's other certifying
      officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
      controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15d-15(e) and
      15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)Designed
      such disclosure controls and
      procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
      under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
      registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the
      registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and presented in this report
      our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
      procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
      evaluation; and





(c)Disclosed
      in this report any change in
      the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
      the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
      reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and





5.The
      registrant's other certifying
      officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
      control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent functions):





(a)All
      significant deficiencies and
      material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
      financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
      registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
      information; and





(b)Any
      fraud, whether or not material,
      that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
      the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:
      April 28, 2008





By:
/s/
                Guoqiang
                Zhan
              Guoqiang
                Zhan
Dismissed and Mem orandum Opinion filed October 6 , 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 16

- 00345

- CV

JAMES C. SMITH , Appellant

V.

RESOURCE ONE CREDIT UNION , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1066139

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This a ppeal is from a judgment signed April 12, 2016 . No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On July 21, 2016 , notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s

i ntention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days,2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Christopher.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         September 25, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 20, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory                           ( print page 44674)                        Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 359 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2017-205, CP2017-313.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-20415 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Order entered November 14, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00622-CV

ALLIANCE FAMILY OF COMPANIES AND JUSTIN MAGNUSON, Appellants

V.

JAMISHA NEVAREZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-01162

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ November 12, 2018 unopposed motion for leave to file 

their reply brief under seal. We GRANT the motion. Appellants shall tender their reply brief by 

November 19, 2018. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to file appellants’ reply brief under 

seal.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
1The Honorable Russell G. Clark, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2785

___________

Joyce R. Jordan, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of *

Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: March 4, 1999

 Filed: April 5, 1999

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Joyce R. Jordan appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment

affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s decision to deny her application for

supplemental security income. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we

conclude that no error of law or fact appears and that an opinion would lack

precedential value. We affirm the district court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Lee W. Marshall, Sr.,Chairman and Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ LEE W. MARSHALL, SR.                                                                                                                  |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Lee W. Marshall, Sr. Chairman and Acting Chief Executive Officer  Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC, General Partner |   |
|                                                                                                                                      |   |
| March 1, 2006                                                                                                                             |   |

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to TEPPCO Partners,L.P. and will be retained by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-71276, 33-94370, 333-83089, 333-84183, 333-38094 and 333-108716 on Form S-8
and Registration Statement Nos. 33-49082, 33-76094, 333- 24549, 333-76641,
333-77925, 333-31442, 333-32776, 333-34958, 333-35934 and 333-107820 on Form S-3
of AVANIR Pharmaceuticals of our report dated December 19, 2003, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AVANIR Pharmaceuticals for the year ended
September 30, 2003.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Diego, California
December 19, 2003
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and
    
    the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Donald M. EarhartDonald M. Earhart
Chief Executive Officer/s/ James R. TalevichJames R. Talevich
Chief Financial Officer
 Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
I-Flow Corporation and will be retained by I-Flow Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0305

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

NEIL DENNIS COLE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 12, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 6 2024

05/06/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0305
```

[Constitution of the United States of America:  Analysis, and Interpretation - 1992 Edition ]
[Amendments to the Constitution]
[Nineteenth Amendment - Women's Suffrage Rights]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

[[Page 1971]]

 
 
                         WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE RIGHTS

                               __________

                          NINETEENTH AMENDMENT

  Section 1. The right of the citizens of the United States to vote 
shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on 
account of sex.
  Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by 
appropriate legislation.

                            WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE

        The Amendment was adopted after a long campaign by its advocates 
who had largely despaired of attaining their goal through modification 
of individual state laws. Agitation in behalf of women's suffrage was 
recorded as early as the Jackson Administration but the initial results 
were meager. Beginning in 1838, Kentucky authorized women to vote in 
school elections and its action was later copied by a number of other 
States. Kansas in 1887 granted women unlimited rights to vote in 
municipal elections. Not until 1869, however, when the Wyoming Territory 
accorded women suffrage rights on an equal basis with men and continued 
the practice following admission to statehood, did these advocates 
register a notable victory. Progress continued to be discouraging, only 
ten additional States having joined Wyoming by 1914, and, judicial 
efforts having failed,\1\ and a vigorous campaign brought congressional 
passage of a proposed Amendment and the necessary state 
ratifications.\2\

        \1\Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162 (1875), a 
challenge under the privileges of immunities clause of the Fourteenth 
Amendment.
        \2\E. Flexner, Century of Struggle--The Woman's Rights Movement 
in the United States (1959).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

        Following the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Fifteenth 
Amendment, the state courts which passed on the effect of the Amendment 
ruled that it did not confer upon women the right to vote but only the 
right not to be discriminated against on the basis of their sex in the 
setting of voting qualifications,\3\ a formalistic distinction to be 
sure but one which has restrained the possible applications of the 
Amendment. In only one case has the Supreme

[[Page 1972]]
Court itself dealt with the Amendment's effect, holding that a Georgia 
poll tax statute which exempted from payment women who did not register 
to vote did not discriminate in any manner against the right of men to 
vote, although it did note that the Amendment ``applies to men and women 
alike and by its own force supersedes inconsistent measures, whether 
federal or State.''\4\

        \3\State v. Mittle, 120 S.C. 526 (1922), writ of error 
dismissed, 260 U.S. 705 (1922); Graves v. Eubank, 205 Ala. 174 (1921); 
In re Cavelier, 287 N.Y.S. 739 (1936).
        \4\Breedlove v. Suttles, 302 U.S. 227, 283-84 (1937).
```
#### BARTRAM et al. v. UNITED STATES (two cases). UNITED STATES v. BARTRAM et al.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

December 9, 1896.)

Nos. 2,326, 2,341, and 2,386.

Customs Duties — Reimport of American Manufactures — Regulations as to Proofs.

• Tbe regulations for making proof, under paragraph 387 of the tariff act of 1894, of the identity of articles of American manufacture, imported without change, after exportation, must be prescribed after the passage of the act, and those in force before its passage are not applicable. Accordingly, *held*that, until such regulations are made, there are none to he complied with to entitle such articles to free entry.

These were two appeals by Bartram Bros, from decisions of the board of general appraisers affirming the assessment of dnty by the collector of the port of New York upon certain hags, coverings of sugar, imported by the appellants, and claimed by them to be entitled to free entry, under paragraph 387 of the tariff act of 1894, as bags of American manufacture, exported empty, and returned filled with foreign produce. The collector rejected this claim, on the ground that the fact was not proved in accordance with the treasury regulations of 1892. The third appeal was by the government from a decision in a like case, sustaining the sufficiency of the proof.

Benjamin Barker, for the importers.

H. D. Sedgwick, Asst. U. S . Atty.

WHEELEB, District Judge.

These importations are of domestic bags, imported by the exporter, and claimed to he free of duty, under paragraph 387 of the tariff act of 1894. In the two former cases this claim appears to have been rejected, because proof was not made “in the form required by article 336 of the treasury regulations of 1892,” and reversal of the other is sought for the same reason. But proof under this paragraph of the act of 1894 was to he made, under general regulations “to be prescribed by the secre*6051:ary of (lie treasury” in the future, and prior regulations would not apply. None had been made under this paragraph at the time of these importations, and therefore none applicable were then in force. The failure to make them would not cut off nor suspend the right, but would leave none to be complied with. U. S. v. Mereadante, 18 C. C. A. 431, 72 Fed. 46, and Dominici v. U. S., 72 Fed. 46.

Decision of appraisers reversed in two former cases, and affirmed in the latter.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated May 19, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and the separate report dated May 19, 2008, with respect tothe financial statement schedule in Item 15 included in the Annual Report of Transcend Services, Inc. on Form 10-K, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, for the year ended December 31, 2008 as well as the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-162106, 333-106446) and in the related Prospectus and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-106454, 033-59115, 333-16213, 333-78777, 333-116911, 333-116910, 333-131059, 333-157780) of TranscendServices, Inc. 

/s/ Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

November 5, 2009
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
              CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION OF THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND
           PREFERENCES OF THE SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK OF
                              DBS INDUSTRIES, INC.

     DBS  Industries,  Inc., a  corporation  organized  and  existing  under the
General  Corporation  Law of the  State of  Delaware,  does  hereby  certify  as
follows:

     1.   The name of the corporation is DBS Industries, Inc.

     2.   The  following  Amendment to the  Certificate  of  Designation  of the
          Relative Rights and Preferences of the Series A Convertible  Preferred
          Stock of DBS Industries,  Inc. was duly adopted in accordance with the
          provisions  of  Sections  141(f),   151(g)  and  242  of  the  General
          Corporation  Law of the State of Delaware  (the  "General  Corporation
          Law") by  resolutions  duly  adopted by the Board of Directors of this
          Corporation.

     3.   Section 1, titled  "Designation  and  Amount,"of  the  Certificate  of
          Designations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock be, and it hereby
          is, amended to read as follows:

               The  shares  of such  series  shall  be  designated  as  Series A
               Convertible  Preferred  Stock,  par value  $.0004  per share (the
               "Series A Convertible  Preferred Stock") and the number of shares
               constituting the series shall be 35,897.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  DBS Industries,  Inc. has caused this Amendment to the
Certificate of Designations  of Series A Convertible  Preferred Stock to be duly
executed by its  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer and attested to by its
Secretary, this ___ day of February 2001.

                                               DBS INDUSTRIES, INC.



                                               By:  ________________________
                                                    Fred W. Thompson, CEO and
                                                    President


ATTEST:



By:  ____________________________
     Randy Stratt, Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001017358
<NAME>                        SPRINT SPECTRUM FINANCE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,497
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,597)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>