alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Susquehanna River Basin Commission

# AGENCY:

Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice lists the minor modifications approved for a previously approved project by the Susquehanna River Basin Commission during the period set forth in                         **DATES**                        .                    

# DATES:

July 1-31, 2017.

# ADDRESSES:

Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 North Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel, telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax: (717) 238-2436; email:                         *joyler@srbc.net.*                         Regular mail inquiries may be sent to the above address.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice lists previously approved projects, receiving approval of minor modifications, described below, pursuant to 18 CFR 806.18 for the time period specified above:

## Minor Modifications Issued Under 18 CFR 806.18

1. SWEPI LP, Docket No. 20161218-1, Deerfield Township, Tioga County, Pa.; approval to change the design of the surface water intake with respect to intake location; Approval Date: July 14, 2017.

Authority:                        Pub. L. 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509                         *et seq.,*18 CFR parts 806, 807, and 808.                    

Dated: September 20, 2017.

Stephanie L. Richardson,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2017-20410 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7040-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Consortium Service
Management Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31,  2004  (the  "Report"), I, Donald S. Robbins, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May  12,  2004


                              /s/  Donald  S.  Robbins
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Donald  S.  Robbins
                              President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-Q  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.










                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 17, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-61061

Summary Calendar

 

KARLA MARCELA MEJIA-MERAZ,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A77-794-601

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Karla Marcela Mejia-Meraz, a native and citizen of Honduras,

petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA) affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial

of her application for asylum and withholding of deportation. 

Mejia argues that she established past persecution on account of

her political commitment to the plight of the indigenous and on

account of her membership in the group of non-indigenous

Hondurans who are politically active on behalf of the indigenous.
No. 02-61061

-2-

When, as in this case, the BIA adopts without opinion the

IJ’s decision, this court reviews the IJ’s decision. Mikhael v.

I.N.S., 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). Here, the IJ’s

determination that Mejia was ineligible for asylum because Mejia

had not shown past persecution on account of any protected ground

was supported by substantial evidence, and the evidence presented

does not compel a contrary conclusion. See Ontunez-Tursios v.

Ashcroft, 303 F.3d 341, 350 (5th Cir. 2002); Girma v. I.N.S., 283

F.3d 664, 669 (5th Cir. 2002). Consequently, Mejia has also not

made the requisite showing for withholding of removal. Girma,

283 F.3d at 666-67.

Based on the foregoing, Mejia’s petition for review is

DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

LORRAINE HARMER,

Petitioner

v.

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

BOARD OF REVIEW,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 104 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of December , 2019, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2907 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2907

               To improve airport screening and security.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 2011

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To improve airport screening and security.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guaranteeing Airport Physical 
Screening Standards Act''.

SEC. 2. SECURED AREAS OF AIRPORTS.

    (a) Implementation of Improved Airport Perimeter Access Security.--
Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security 
Administration) shall issue regulations, directives, or other 
appropriate measures to implement the requirements of section 
44903(h)(4) of title 49, United States Code.
    (b) Airport Security Plans.--The Assistant Secretary shall set a 
schedule for requiring airports to update their airport security plans 
to comply with the requirements of section 44903(h)(4) not later than 3 
years after the issuance of the regulations, directives, or other 
measures required under subsection (a).

SEC. 3. HIRING OF SCREENERS.

    (a) Number of Screeners.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the Secretary of Homeland Security may hire the number of 
passenger and baggage screeners that the Secretary determines necessary 
to ensure aviation security.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. John Earl PEREZ, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-50239

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 19, 2008.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John Earl Perez, Jr., Three Rivers, TX, pro se.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent John Earl Perez, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Perez has not filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of any claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. *See United States v. Cantwell,*470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006). Our independent re*342view of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 I, Gordon W. Allison, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Consortium Service Management Group, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
 
 a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a.  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  ****Date: August 26, 2004
By:
/s/ Gordon W. AllisonGordon W. AllisonChief Financial Officer
 
 
 Exhibit 31.1
Page 1 of 1 Page
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2009

s0316 

# Order

March 23, 2009

137434

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137434 COA: 286317 Wayne CC: 93-000581-FC LEWIS AARON NIXON, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 30, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Opinion issued February 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-01037-CV

———————————

SUNIL KUMAR TYAGI AND SUNNY'S PERFUME, INC., Appellants

V.

GOPE C. PAGARANI AND BNP IMPORTS, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 884326

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, stating 

that the parties have settled their claims. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). No 

opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). Accordingly, we grant the motion 
2

and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending 

motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly  report of Creative  Eateries  Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Frank
Holdraker,  certify to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Frank Holdraker
---------------------------
Frank Holdraker, President
September 14, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2927 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2927

To give priority to local and State artists when selecting appropriate 
                     artwork for Federal buildings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 2011

   Mr. Griffin of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To give priority to local and State artists when selecting appropriate 
                     artwork for Federal buildings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hometown Artists Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. SELECTION OF ARTISTS FOR GSA ART-IN-ARCHITECTURE PROGRAM.

    (a) Priority for Local and State Artists.--To the maximum extent 
practicable, the Administrator of the General Service Administration 
(hereinafter referred to in this section as the ``Administrator'') 
shall give priority to local and State artists when selecting 
appropriate artwork for Federal buildings.
    (b) Exception for District of Columbia.--Subsection (a) shall not 
apply to artwork selected for Federal buildings located in the District 
of Columbia.
    (c) Regulations.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall by rule amend such 
Federal regulations as required to make such regulations consistent 
with this section.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44673-44674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): September 
25, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 20, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory

[[Page 44674]]

Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service to Add 
Priority Mail Contract 359 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017-205, CP2017-313.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-20415 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Lansdowne Security, Inc.: Exhibit 10.16 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.16

Land Transfer Agreement 

Party A: Villagers’ Committee of Jiangtou Village 
Party
B: Aierda Shoe Plastic Co., Ltd, Jinjiang, Fujian 

After negotiation, the parties have reached an agreement on the
issue concerning the transfer of the twenty units of land located in Chendai,
Jinjiang City, Fujian Province. 

	1. 	Party B agrees to pay RMB 20 millions for land-use right of the said
      land of Party A, with term of use 50 years. 
	 	 
	2. 	Party A should timely hand the land over to Party B once the use and
      operation right of land is transferred. Within the term of transferring,
      the whole land-use right belongs to Party B. When the agreement expires,
      Party A should assist Party B with relevant formalities of contract
      extending issue and Party B doesn’t need to bear any relevant expenses.
  
	 	 
	3. 	Party A shallnot make excuses, rejections, or postpones when it is
      needed by Party B for relevant formalities of the said land, otherwise,
      Party A will be charged penalty equaling two times of the transfer fee and
      other relevant loss of Party B. 
	 	 
	4. 	Party A makes a commitment to Party B that the said land in this
      Agreement does not belong to land for basic use, and if any recourse due
      to this cause happens, Party A will be charged penalty equaling two times
      of the transfer fee and other relevant loss of Party B. 
	 	 
	5. 	Party B will first pay Party A RMB 5 millions after signing this
      Agreement, the rest part will be paid up in one time after all the
      transfer formalities are done under the assistance of Party A. 
	 	 
	6. 	This Agreement is made in two copies, and each party will hold one
      copy which is effective upon signing this Agreement. 


Party A: Villagers’ Committee of Jiangtou Village 
Date:
June 24, 1991 

Party B: Aierda Shoe Plastic Co., Ltd, Jinjiang, Fujian

Date: June 24, 1991
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,278                  37,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0                   3,782
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,586                  13,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                       306                     306
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,690                  59,739
<PP&E>                                          24,410                  20,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,012                  11,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,854                  69,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,019                  49,445
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           181                     175
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,530                  19,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,854                  47,854
<SALES>                                         74,247                  73,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,247                  73,180
<CGS>                                           29,838                  29,830
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,855                  89,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,067)                (14,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        83                     166
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,150)                (14,293)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (15,843)                 (2,935)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,993)                (17,228)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.98)                  (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.98)                  (1.00)


</TABLE>