alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.4





Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer CNET Networks, Inc. (CNET) hereby certifies that:

1.	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CNET for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

2.	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of CNET.









Dated: May 5, 2003











/s/Douglas N. Woodrum

Douglas N. Woodrum
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of CNET, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 10, 2019

d0507 

# Order

Clerk May 10, 2019

159414

SC: 159414

In re K. M. HOUSER, Minor. COA: 344712

Genesee CC Family Division:

16

- 133554

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that t he questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### DEREK ANDREW INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. POOF APPAREL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-35048.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 8, 2008.

Filed June 11, 2008.

Lacy H. Koonce, III, Esq., Davis Wright *&*Tremaine, New York, NY, Kaustuv M. Das, Esq., David Harry Deits, Esq., Zachary Tomlinson, Esq., Nigel Avilez, Esq., Davis Wright & Tremaine, LLP, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert J. Stumpf, Jr., Esq., Neil A. Smith, Esq., Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

*555Before: GRABER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and WRIGHT,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Otis D. Wright II, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Defendant Poof Apparel Corporation appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to set aside entry of default and the court’s award to Plaintiff Derek Andrew, Inc., of $685,807.70 in disgorged profits under the Lanham Act and Washington Consumer Protection Act. The relevant facts are set forth in an opinion filed this date.

1. We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of a motion to set aside an entry of default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c). *Yusov v. Yusuf,*892 F.2d 784, 787 (9th Cir.1989). We find no abuse of discretion here, because Defendant’s “culpable conduct led to the default.” *See Am. Ass’n Naturopathic Physicians v. Hayhurst,*227 F.3d 1104, 1108 (9th Cir.2000) (listing factors allowing court to deny motion to vacate default judgment). Defendant received actual notice of the filing of the action and intentionally failed to answer. Its belief that this was a small case more appropriate for settlement than litigation was insufficient justification for its failure to respond to the complaint. *See Franchise Holding II, LLC v. Huntington Rests. Group, Inc.,*375 F.3d 922, 926 (9th Cir.2004) (rejecting similar argument).

2. We review for clear error the district court’s computation of damages. *Lum v. Honolulu,*963 F.2d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir.1992), and find none. Under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), the remedies available to a prevailing plaintiff include an award of the defendant’s profits. Title 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) also provides that, in assessing profits, the plaintiff need only prove the defendant’s sales, and the “defendant must prove all elements of cost or deduction claimed.” The district court permissibly found that Mr. Terzi’s testimony was neither credible nor based on personal knowledge, permissibly relied on Plaintiffs evidence, including documentary evidence, and permissibly drew reasonable inferences.

The district court’s denial of the motion to set aside the default judgment, and its calculation of damages under the Lanham Act and the parallel Washington Consumer Protection Act are AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                  0
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        0
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   2,892,000
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             1,409,000
<COMMON>                                11,949,000
<OTHER-SE>                              (16,250,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            0
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        178,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (178,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (178,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.01)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, William S. Creekmuir, as Chief Financial Officer of Simmons Bedding Company
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:

            (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
      ended June 26, 2004 (the "Report"), being filed with the U.S. Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: August 10, 2004                          /s/ William S. Creekmuir
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Name: William S. Creekmuir
                                               Title:  Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simmons Bedding Company and will be retained by Simmons Bedding
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Birch Branch, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy Brasel,
Derold L. Kelley, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge,:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date:    September 30, 2009

/s/ Timothy Brasel
------------------
Timothy Brasel
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Director
Exhibit 21.1

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. SUBSIDIARIES

Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of OrganizationHaynes Wire Company
(Wholly owned subsidiary in Mountain Home, North Carolina)

DelawareHaynes International, Ltd.
(Wholly owned subsidiary in Openshaw, England)

United KingdomHaynes International, S.A.R.L.
(Wholly owned subsidiary in Paris, France)

FranceNickel-Contor AG
(Wholly owned subsidiary in Zurich, Switzerland)

SwitzerlandHaynes International, S.r.l.
(Wholly owned subsidiary of Nickel-Contor in Italy)

ItalyHaynes Pacific Pte. Ltd.
(Wholly owned subsidiary in Singapore)

SingaporeHaynes International (China) Ltd.
(Wholly owned subsidiary of Haynes Pacific Pte. Ltd.)

People's Republic of ChinaHaynes International, Inc. India Branch Office
(Wholly owned Branch Office in India)

India


---



QuickLinks
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 24-0226

PAUL L. CAMPBELL,

Petitioner, 

### v. GRANT OF MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FILING FEE JIM SALMONSEN, WARDEN MONTANA STATE PRISON,

Respondent. 

### Motion to proceed without payment ofthe filing fee in this matter is GRANTED. DATED: April 8, 2024.


# FILED APR -8 2024 Bowen Greenw000 Clark of Supreme Court State of Moote,,, a BOWEN GREENWOOD

Clerk ofthe Supreme Court 04/08/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0226
**Exhibit 15(a)**

**Consent of independent registered public accounting firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements (Form F-3 No. 333-108084 and Form S-8 Nos. 333-99785,333-89508, 333-104691, 333-126139, 333-181334 and 333-197846) of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC of our reports dated February 22, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

London, England

March 2, 2016
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1




 DYNAMEX INC.
 CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
 (in thousands except per share data)
 (Unaudited)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                         Three months ended
                                              October 31,
                                        --------------------
                                          2002         2001
                                        --------     -------
<S>                                     <C>          <C>
Net income                              $  1,968     $   907
                                        ========     =======

Weighted average common
   shares outstanding                     11,207      10,207

Common share equivalents related
   to options and warrants                    72          38
                                        --------     -------

Common shares and common share
   equivalents                            11,279      10,245
                                        ========     =======

Common stock price used under
   treasury stock method                $   2.44     $  1.93
                                        ========     =======

Net income (loss) per common share:
   Basic                                $   0.18     $  0.09
                                        ========     =======

   Diluted                              $   0.17     $  0.09
                                        ========     =======
</Table>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LAMONT J. DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1466

[ October 23, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 562010CF000850A.

Lamont J. Davis, Bonifay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Lamont Davis appeals an order both denying his petition for writ of 

habeas corpus and dismissing without prejudice his rule 3.850 motion for 

postconviction relief. We affirm the denial of the petition for writ of habeas 

corpus only. Because the dismissal of the rule 3.850 motion was without 

prejudice to refile a sufficient motion, it is not a final, appealable order. 

See Russell v. State, 46 So. 3d 151, 151 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Affirmed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     The undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of First Keystone
Financial, Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/ Thomas M. Kelly
-----------------------------------------------------------
Name:  Thomas M. Kelly
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  December 27, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 32


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Trover Solutions, Inc. (the "Corporation") for the
period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, hereby certifies
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

/s/ Patrick B. McGinnis
-----------------------------------------
Patrick B. McGinnis
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
March 19, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
has been provided to Trover Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Trover
Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



<PAGE>
               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Trover Solutions, Inc. (the "Corporation") for the
period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Corporation, hereby certifies that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d, as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

/s/ Douglas R. Sharps
-----------------------------------------
Douglas R. Sharps
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 19, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
has been provided to Trover Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Trover
Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Exhibit 12.1****COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**                   **Three Months Ended June 30,**  **Six Months Ended June 30,**   **2005**  **2004**  **2005**  **2004**       (in thousands)     **Fixed Charges:**                Gross interest expense $5,621  $4,381  $11,045  $8,609 Interest portion of rent expense.  45   38   95   80                 5,666   4,419   11,140   8,689                  **Earnings:**                Income before taxes  67,571   73,146   191,855   135,792 Plus: fixed charges  5,666   4,419   11,140   8,689 Less: capitalized interest  2,425   2,075   4,415   4,016                $70,812  $75,490  $198,580  $140,465                  **Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**  12.5x  17.1x  17.8x  16.2x                       **For the Years Ended December 31,**   **2004**  **2003**  **2002**  **2001**  **2000**   (in thousands) **Fixed Charges:**                    Gross interest expense $17,813  $15,642  $15,373  $15,034  $25,100 Interest portion of rent expense.  157   129   122   46   40                    17,970   15,771   15,495   15,080   25,140                      **Earnings:**                    Income before taxes  259,416   205,999   109,586   189,404   127,743 Plus: fixed charges  17,970   15,771   15,495   15,080   25,140 Less: capitalized interest  8,358   7,300   7,975   12,042   13,739                   $269,028  $214,470  $117,106  $192,442  $139,144                      **Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**  15.0x  13.6x  7.6x  12.8x  5.5x
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 
  





 
 DATED: NUMBER SHARES INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CUSIP 299734 10 3 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS C O M M
O N S T O C K Evelo Biosciences, Inc. CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER This Certifies That: is the owner of CS COUNTERSIGNED: BY: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF $0.001 PAR VALUE EACH OF Evelo Biosciences, Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This certificate and the
shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware, and to the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent
and registered by the Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. SPECIMEN SPECIMEN SPECIMEN
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 20073 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
SERGIO TORRES TORRES, also known as Sergio Torres , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11

- CR

- 383

- 1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sergio Torres Torres
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Torres h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 17, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-20073 Document: 00512473135 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013No. 13

- 20073

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-20073 Document: 00512473135 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013