alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 134109 & (73) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134109 COA: 261276 Macomb CC: 2004-002865-FC KAREEM DALE RHODES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

p1010 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 17, 2007

Clerk
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofOctober 1, 2013, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland LoanServices, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian, withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2013-C12 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Agreement,I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services dohereby certify that:

 

1.A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision,and

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the ReportingPeriod.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2018.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cell Tech International Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Marta C. Carpenter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                             /s/ Marta C. Carpenter
                             ------------------------------------
                             Marta C. Carpenter
                             Principal Executive Officer and Principal
                             Financial and Accounting Officer


                             DATED: November 19, 2004


                                       23
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-20711

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS CORONA-PEDROZA, also known as Carlos Michell Corona, also 

known as Carlos Pedroza Corona, also known as Carlos Mitchell CoronaPedraza,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-228-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos CoronaPedroza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Corona-Pedroza has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-20711 Document: 00514122306 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
No. 16-20711

2

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-20711 Document: 00514122306 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Lance Cornell, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Transcend Services, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

Date: March 8, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1000



<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                      JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              1,264
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       7,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    9,051
<PP&E>                                              6,357
<DEPRECIATION>                                      5,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      17,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               5,308
<BONDS>                                             133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                          10,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        17,308
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    28,008
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       21,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    8,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (526)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,057)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,057)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.18)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20321]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15300 and #15301; PUERTO RICO Disaster Number 
PR-00030]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of 
Puerto Rico (FEMA-4336-DR), dated 09/10/2017.
    Incident: Hurricane Irma.
    Incident Period: 09/05/2017 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 09/16/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/09/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/11/2018.

ADDRESSES:  Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the Commonwealth of 
Puerto Rico, dated 09/10/2017, is hereby amended to include the 
following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Aguas Buenas, Barranquitas, Bayamon, Camuy, Catano, 
Ciales, Comerio, Hatillo, Jayuya, Las Piedras, Quebradillas, Salinas, 
San Juan, Vega Baja, Yauco

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-20321 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 31.2

ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Jones, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2015 of Iconix Brand Group, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 29, 2016                                            
|                                                                
|/s/ David Jones                                                 
|David Jones
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2941 

To make the internal control reporting and assessment requirements of the 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 optional for certain smaller companies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2011 

Mr. QUAYLE (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. YODER, Mr. 

HULTGREN, Mr. SMITH of Texas, and Mr. DOLD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To make the internal control reporting and assessment requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 optional 

for certain smaller companies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Startup Expansion and 

5 Investment Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2941 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM THE INTERNAL CONTROL RE2 PORTING AND ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS. 

3 Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 

4 U.S.C. 7262) is amended by striking subsection (c) and 

5 inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘(c) EXEMPTION.—The Commission’s rules under 

7 subsection (a) shall permit an issuer to elect not to provide 

8 the assessment described in subsection (a)(2) and the at9 testation thereof described in subsection (b) if the issuer— 

10 ‘‘(1) has a total market capitalization for the 

11 relevant reporting period of less than 

12 $1,000,000,000; and 

13 ‘‘(2) is not subject to the annual reporting re14 quirement under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Secu15 rities Exchange Act of 1934, or has been subject to 

16 such requirement for a period of fewer than 10 

17 years. 

18 ‘‘(d) DISCLOSURE.—An issuer that, pursuant to sub19 section (c), elects not to provide the assessment described 

20 in subsection (a)(2) and the attestation described in sub21 section (b), shall disclose that decision in the next report 

22 required under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Ex23 change Act of 1934.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C.  SECTION 1350)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aware, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, to the
best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











/s/   Michael A.
      Tzannes
              
              /s/   Richard P.
      MobergChief
      Executive Officer
              
              Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:  July
      31, 2009
              
              Date:
      July 31, 2009




The certification set forth above is
being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as
a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying
officers.
**Exhibit 12(b)**
**302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Richard Solomons, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the company and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 30, 2007 By:  /s/ Richard Solomons    Name:  Richard Solomons    Title:  Finance Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN ALBERT WILKERSON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (CR-00-9; CA-02-161-1)

Submitted: July 28, 2004 Decided: August 13, 2004

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Albert Wilkerson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard

Ascik, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1For the purpose of this appeal, we assume the date appearing

in the letter is the earliest date it could have been properly

delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. See Fed.

R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). 

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John Albert Wilkerson, Jr., moves for a certificate of

appealability. We deny the motion and dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction because Wilkerson has not filed a timely notice of

appeal. When the United States or its officer or agency is a

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days

after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order,

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,

434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361

U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order denying Wilkerson’s § 2255

motion was entered August 19, 2002. Wilkerson’s next filing was a

letter dated April 7, 2004.1 Construing the letter as a notice of

appeal, it is clearly untimely. In a May 7, 2004, order responding

to the April 7 letter, the district court instructed Wilkerson to

file in this court a motion for a certificate of appealability and

implicitly denied Wilkerson’s request in his April 7 letter to give

him permission to appeal. Wilkerson adhered to the court’s
2Construing the petition for a certificate of appealability as

a notice of appeal from the May 7 order is also without merit. The

district court’s implicit denial of permission to file a notice of

appeal is without error. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), (6). 

- 3 -

instruction and filed the petition in this court on May 31, 2004.

Construing this filing as a notice of appeal from the August 19,

2002, order, it is also untimely. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction and deny as moot the petition for a certificate of

appealability.2 

DISMISSED