alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------


                                  CERTIFICATION

By signing below, each of the undersigned  officers hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge,  (i) this report fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the  information  contained  in this  report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of River
Valley Bancorp.

Signed this 14th day of May 2003.



/a/ Matthew P. Forrester                    /s/ Larry C. Fouse
-------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
Matthew P. Forrester                        Larry C. Fouse
President and Chief Executive Officer       Vice President of Finance

















A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to River Valley Bank and will be retained by River Valley Bank and will
be  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff  upon
request.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6402

ANTOINE LORENZO BOWDEN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2:17

- cv - 00196

- RBS

- LRL )

Submitted : September 13, 2018 Decided: September 18, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and KING , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Antoine Lorenzo Bowden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antoine Lorenzo Bowden seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability . 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner sat isfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 52 9 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bowden has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense w ith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7264

PAUL W. FERRELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM C. DUNCIL, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-79-2) Submitted: March 20, 2000 Decided: September 12, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lonnie C. Simmons, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant.Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Attorney General, Barbara H. Allen, Managing Deputy Attorney General, Allen H. Loughry II, Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Paul W. Ferrell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ferrell v. Duncil , No. CA-97-79-2 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2774 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2774

             To repeal the Legal Services Corporation Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2011

 Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To repeal the Legal Services Corporation Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Legal Services 
Corporation Act is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Jerry Lee Sanders

No. 06-22-00014-CV

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Carter* participating. *Justice Carter, 

Retired, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED MARCH 22, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00373

- CR

James R. Hernandez

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 297th District Court

o f Tarrant County (1413791D )

August 9 , 2018

Opinion by Justice Pittman

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEA LS

By

_ /s/ Mark T. Pittman

________________ Justice Mark T. Pittman
exhibit10-80.htm




Exhibit 10.80 


 


Letter agreement effective January 1, 2011 between Steve Berkowitz and Move, Inc. regarding paid time off


 


MOVE

910 East Hamilton Ave., 6th Floor 

Campbell, CA 95008 


 


November 17, 2010 


 


Dear Steve,


 


Effective January 1, 2011, you and other senior executives reporting directly to the you (the “Leadership Team”) will no longer be subject to, or accrue or accumulate paid time off under the vacation, floating holiday and/or paid sick leave policies set forth in the Move Inc. Employee Handbook or in your offer letter or any other documentation with the Company.


 


Rather, members of the Leadership Team will be permitted to take paid time off for vacation and personal matters, subject to business needs, with your approval. The primary limitations on permitting the taking of vacation or time off for personal matters will be those dictated by your job responsibilities. Accordingly, there will be no prescribed limits on the amount of vacation or personal time, if any, that you may request or be permitted to take in a given year notwithstanding any reference thereto in any offer letter or any other documentation with the Company.


 


In addition, paid time off for occasional, short illnesses will be permitted on an as-needed basis, subject to medical verification if requested. Leadership Team members who qualify for and are granted a leave of absence under Move Inc.’s Disability Leave of Absence or Family and Medical Leave of Absence policies will be paid for up to a maximum of ninety (90) days of any such leave taken in any twelve (12)-month rolling period, less any income received from any income replacement benefits or insurance provided pursuant to any applicable law or Company-sponsored insurance or benefit program.


 


Members of the Leadership Team will retain all vacation accrued on or before December 31, 2010. Paid time off taken on or after January 1, 2011 will reduce any such accrued vacation balance. If upon separation from employment, a Leadership Team member has a balance of unused vacation, he or she will be paid out in accordance with the Company’s policies and practices and applicable law.


 


Please indicate you acceptance of these terms by signing below and returning this letter to me. 


 


Very truly yours,


 


       /s/ Jim Caulfield 


 


Jim Caulfield 

EVP and General Counsel


 



	cc	      	Carol Brummer, VP, Human Resources	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name 	/s/ Steve Berkowitz	 	Date	11/17/10	 
	 	 	Steve Berkowitz
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2687 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2687

   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease certain lands 
     within Fort Pulaski National Monument, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2011

 Mr. Kingston introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease certain lands 
     within Fort Pulaski National Monument, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fort Pulaski National Monument Lease 
Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. LEASE AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this 
section as the ``Secretary'') may lease to the Savannah Bar Pilots 
Association, or a successor organization, no more than 30,000 square 
feet of land and improvements within Fort Pulaski National Monument 
(referred to in this section as the ``Monument'') at the location on 
Cockspur Island that has been used continuously by the Savannah Bar 
Pilots Association since 1940.
    (b) Rental Fee and Proceeds.--
            (1) Rental fee.--For the lease authorized by this Act, the 
        Secretary shall require a rental fee based on fair market value 
        adjusted, as the Secretary deems appropriate, for amounts to be 
        expended by the lessee for property preservation, maintenance, 
        or repair and related expenses.
            (2) Proceeds.--Disposition of the proceeds from the rental 
        fee required pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be made in 
        accordance with section 3(k)(5) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 
        1a-2(k)(5)).
    (c) Terms and Conditions.--A lease entered into under this 
section--
            (1) shall be for a term of no more than 10 years and, at 
        the Secretary's discretion, for successive terms of no more 
        than 10 years at a time; and
            (2) shall include any terms and conditions the Secretary 
        determines to be necessary to protect the resources of the 
        Monument and the public interest.
    (d) Exemption From Applicable Law.--Except as provided in section 
2(b)(2) of this Act, the lease authorized by this Act shall not be 
subject to section 3(k) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-2(k)) or 
section 321 of Act of June 30, 1932 (40 U.S.C. 1302).
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2911 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the corporate income 

tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 

Mr. GOHMERT (for himself, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. ROSS of Florida, Mr. MICA, 

and Mr. FARENTHOLD) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the corporate income tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Jobs Act 

5 of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CORPORATE INCOME TAX. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 11 of the 

8 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as fol9 lows: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2911 IH

1 ‘‘(b) AMOUNT OF TAX.—The amount of the tax im2 posed by subsection (a) shall be zero percent of taxable 

3 income.’’. 

4 (b) REPEAL OF ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX FOR

5 CORPORATIONS.—Subparagraph (B) of section 55(b)(1) 

6 of such Code is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(B) CORPORATIONS.—In the case of a 

8 corporation, the tentative minimum tax for the 

9 taxable year is zero.’’. 

10 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

11 (1) Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 1445(e) 

12 of such Code are each amended by striking ‘‘35 per13 cent’’ and inserting ‘‘0 percent’’. 

14 (2) Subparagraph (A) of section 7518(g)(6) of 

15 such Code is amended by striking ‘‘34 percent’’ and 

16 inserting ‘‘0 percent’’. 

17 (3) Paragraph (2) of section 53511(f) of title 

18 46, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘34 

19 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘0 percent’’. 

20 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

22 December 31, 2011, except that the amendments made 

23 by subsection (c) shall take effect on such date. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order filed July 27, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00305-CV

____________

JERLENE BATISTE, Appellant

V.

CARLA ARMAUND; KINGWOOD PINES HOSPITAL, LLC; RAYMOND 

BATISTE; AND JERRI SETHNA, MD, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1153306-102

ORDER

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. On June 23, 2021, the court 

reporter informed this court the reporter’s record had not been requested or paid for. 

We will consider and decide those issues that do not require a reporter’s record 

unless appellant, within fifteen days of the date of this order, provides this court with 

proof that (1) a request to prepare the reporter’s record has been made; and 

(2) arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record have been made. See Tex. R. App.
2

P. 37.3(c). If appellant does not provide this court with such proof, appellant’s brief 

in this appeal will be due forty-five days from the date of this order, or 30 days after 

the clerk’s record is provided to this court, whichever is later.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Bourliot, Poissant, and Wilson.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Certification ofChief Financial Officer ofGold Banc Corporation, Inc.**

 

I, Rick J.Tremblay, Chief Financial Officer of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc., herebycertify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(a)                                  The Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2003, which accompanies thiscertification, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)                                 The informationcontained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March31, 2002, which accompanies this certification, fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GoldBanc Corporation, Inc.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gold BancCorporation, Inc. and will be retained by Gold Banc Corporation, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated:  May 15, 2003. |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
|                       | /s/ Rick J.  Tremblay |   |
|                       | Rick J.  Tremblay |
|                       | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Annual Report of NELX,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-KSB for the period  ended May 31,  2005 (the  "Report")  filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission,  I, John M. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Company's  Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



         September 9,  2005                         /s/ John M. Jacobs
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    John M. Jacobs
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
1998 FOR 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          37,808
<SECURITIES>                                     3,782
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                       306
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,739
<PP&E>                                          20,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,445
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           175
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,154
<SALES>                                         79,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,532
<CGS>                                           32,394
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,062)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       166
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,228)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,228)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.00)
        



</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 22, 2014

NO. 03

- 12

- 00544

- CR

Willie James Sauls, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, J USTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD
MODIF IED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court ho lds that there wa s no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. However,

there was error in the judgment and sentence that requires correction. Therefore, the Court

modifies the trial court’s judgment and sentence as follows: to reflect that appellant pleaded not

true to the two enhancement paragraphs . The judgment of conviction , as modified, is affirmed

.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2471 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2471

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2011

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend section 2710 of title 18, United States Code, to clarify that 
a video tape service provider may obtain a consumer's informed, written 
 consent on an ongoing basis and that consent may be obtained through 
                             the Internet.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    Section 2710(b)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:
            ``(B) to any person with the informed, written consent 
        (including through an electronic means using the Internet) in a 
        form distinct and separate from any form setting forth other 
        legal or financial obligations of the consumer given at one or 
        both of the following times--
                    ``(i) the time the disclosure is sought; and
                    ``(ii) in advance for a set period of time or until 
                consent is withdrawn by such consumer;''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```