alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                  DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company of Texas (Incorporated in Texas), a
subsidiary of Delphi Financial Group, Inc.

Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Incorporated in Illinois), a
subsidiary of Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company of Texas.

First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Incorporated in New York), a
subsidiary of Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.

SIG Holdings, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

Safety National Casualty Corporation (Incorporated in Missouri), a subsidiary of
SIG Holdings, Inc.

Safety National Re (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands), a subsidiary of Safety
National Casualty Corporation

Matrix Absence Management, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of
Delphi Financial Group, Inc.

Matrix Payroll Services, Inc. (Incorporated in California), a subsidiary of
Matrix Absence Management, Inc.

Gunz & Associates, Inc. (Incorporated in California), a subsidiary of Matrix
Absence Management, Inc.

RSL Investors, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

Chestnut Investors II, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi
Financial Group, Inc.

Chestnut Investors III, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi
Financial Group, Inc.

Chestnut Investors IV, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi
Financial Group, Inc.

DFG II Corporation (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

DFG Corporation (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of DFG II Corporation.

APDEL LLC (Organized in Delaware), a subsidiary of DFG II Corporation and
Chestnut Investors IV, Inc.

Delphi Capital Management, Inc. (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of
Delphi Financial Group, Inc.

RSL Marketing, Inc. (Incorporated in Nevada), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.

Delphi Brokerage Company (Incorporated in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi
Financial Group, Inc.

Delphi Funding L.L.C. (Organized in Delaware), a subsidiary of Delphi Financial
Group, Inc.
exhibit10-81.htm




Exhibit 10.81


 


Letter agreement effective January 1, 2011 between Rob Krolik and Move, Inc. regarding paid time off


 


MOVE

910 East Hamilton Ave., 6th Floor

Campbell, CA 95008


 


November 17, 2010


 


Dear Rob,


 


Effective January 1, 2011, you and other senior executives reporting directly to the CEO (the “Leadership Team”) will no longer be subject to, or accrue or accumulate paid time off under the vacation, floating holiday and/or paid sick leave policies set forth in the Move Inc. Employee Handbook or in your offer letter or any other documentation with the Company.


 


Rather, members of the Leadership Team will be permitted to take paid time off for vacation and personal matters, subject to business needs, with the approval of the CEO. The primary limitations on permitting the taking of vacation or time off for personal matters will be those dictated by your job responsibilities. Accordingly, there will be no prescribed limits on the amount of vacation or personal time, if any, that you may request or be permitted to take in a given year notwithstanding any reference thereto in any offer letter or any other documentation with the Company.


 


In addition, paid time off for occasional, short illnesses will be permitted on an as-needed basis, subject to medical verification if requested by the CEO. Leadership Team members who qualify for and are granted a leave of absence under Move Inc.’s Disability Leave of Absence or Family and Medical Leave of Absence policies will be paid for up to a maximum of ninety (90) days of any such leave taken in any twelve (12)-month rolling period, less any income received from any income replacement benefits or insurance provided pursuant to any applicable law or Company-sponsored insurance or benefit program.


 


Members of the Leadership Team will retain all vacation accrued on or before December 31, 2010. Paid time off taken on or after January 1, 2011 will reduce any such accrued vacation balance. If upon separation from employment, a Leadership Team member has a balance of unused vacation, he or she will be paid out in accordance with the Company’s policies and practices and applicable law.


 


Please indicate you acceptance of these terms by signing below and returning this letter to me.


 


Very truly yours,


 



	       	/s/ Steve Berkowitz	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Steve Berkowitz	 	 	 
	Chief Executive Officer	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	cc       	Carol Brummer, VP, Human Resources	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Name   	/s/ Rob Krolik	Date	       11/17/10	 
	 	Rob Krolik
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00613-CV

Clayton McBryde, Appellant

v.

Grande Communications, Inc.; The City of Austin d/b/a Austin Energy; The City of Austin

d/b/a Austin Energy Ventures; The City of Austin d/b/a Austin Energy Services; The City

of Austin d/b/a Austin Energy Products; et al., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN301906, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss. We grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).

___________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 2, 2007
Exhibit 10.31

                    The Reader's Digest Association, Inc.
                           FlexNet Program Summary

Under the FlexNet Program, Reader's Digest funds a dollar-value account for
participants (including executive officers) at the beginning of each calendar
year.  Funding of the account ranges from $12,500 to $33,500 (or such other
amounts as may be determined by Reader's Digest's Compensation and Nominating
Committee), and is based on each participant's position and level of
responsibility.  Participants may request reimbursement from the account for
eligible expenses incurred during the calendar year (plus an estimated tax
gross-up).  "Eligible expenses" include: financial fitness expenses
(including costs of financial planning and legal services); personal fitness
expenses (including physical examination costs, sports participation fees,
weight/nutrition/smoking cessation counseling, etc.); family life expenses
(including country club and health club, etc.); and education expenses
(including non-company-reimbursable executive training and development
expenses and home computer costs, etc.).
**Exhibit 12(b)**

I, Paul Edgecliffe-Johnson, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report onForm 20-F of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report anychange in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: 1 March 2018 

/s/ Paul Edgecliffe-Johnson 

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

FELIPE VEGA, JR.,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 168 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Protein Polymer Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
      to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
      JAMES
      B. MCCCARTHY





James
      B.
      McCarthy


Interim
      Chief Executive Officer


May
      12,
      2008
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129356 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129356 COA: 252595 Wayne CC: 03-008866-01 LEONARD ARN EZ HUNTER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 30, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                   70,317
<RECEIVABLES>                                   8,369
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,186)
<INVENTORY>                                   129,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              237,200
<PP&E>                                      2,099,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                (36,890)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              4,687,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         231,706
<BONDS>                                     1,324,162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  2,032,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                4,687,165
<SALES>                                         8,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                9,467
<CGS>                                          26,409
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 200,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,122
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (94)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (188,884)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (188,884)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (188,884)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          35,144
<SECURITIES>                                    32,594
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                       245
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,622
<PP&E>                                           3,563
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,218)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,566
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,606
<SALES>                                         15,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,851
<CGS>                                            3,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (959)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,040)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,040)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,040)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.08)


</TABLE>
ex10_72.htm


EXHIBIT 10.72







SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE


USEC INC. EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN







 


WHEREAS, the USEC Inc. Executive Severance Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted effective as of July 31, 2008; and


 


WHEREAS, an amendment to the Plan is desired in order to make certain changes to the restrictions in the Plan to clarify the timing of payment and to state certain rules of construction;


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:


 


1.           Section 3.4 of the Plan is amended and restated to read as follows:


 


“3.4           Payment.  Subject to Section 3.5 below, the Participant’s Prorated Performance Bonus, if any, shall be payable in a lump sum after the end of the performance period at such time as bonuses under the Annual Incentive Program are paid to other executives of the Company but in any event no later than March 15th of the following calendar year.  Subject to Section 3.5 below, all other Severance Pay shall be payable in a lump sum as soon as practicable after the Eligible Separation from Service, but in any event no later than March 15th of the calendar year after the year in which the Eligible Separation from Service occurs.  Notwithstanding the preceding sentences, in the event Severance Pay or any other payment or distribution of a benefit under this Plan is deferred compensation subject to additional taxes or penalties under Section 409A of the Code if paid on or commencing on the date specified in this Plan, because the Participant is a Specified Employee within the meaning of the Section 409A regulations, such payment or distribution shall not be made or commence prior to the earliest date on which Section 409A permits such payment or commencement without additional taxes or penalties under Section 409A.  In the event payment is deferred under the preceding sentence, any amount that would have been paid prior to the deferred payment date but for Section 409A shall be paid in a single lump sum on such earliest payment date, without interest.”


 


2.           A new Section 6.11 is added to the Plan to read as follows:


 


“6.11           Interpretation and Construction.  This Plan is intended to be written, and shall be construed and operated in a manner that complies with Section 409A, such that no amounts payable hereunder shall become subject to income inclusion, additional taxes or interest under Section 409A of the Code (collectively “409A Penalties”).  In no event shall the Company be required to provide any Participant a tax gross-up payment with respect to, or to pay, any 409A Penalties.


 


3.           Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


Executed as of this 1st day of November, 2010


 


USEC Inc.


 












By:           /s/ W. Lance Wright                                                                


W. Lance Wright


Title:       Senior Vice President, Human Resources and


Administration







--
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 6, 2023 No. 04-22-00901-CV IN RE FAIR OAKS COUNTRY STORE, LLC Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 

### O R D E R Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice On December 30, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of the tentative opinion that a serious question concerning the requested relief requires further consideration. Therefore, the court requests that respondent and real parties in interest file a response to the petition on or before January 26, 2023. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(b). Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. It is so ORDERED on January 6, 2023. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020CI14929, styled Stacy Marc Barrus as Turnover Receiver for Victor Farias and Integrity Aviation and Leasing, LLC, and Gina Perez, Lisa Aldaco, Olga Perez-Meredith, Viola Fraga, Elaine Castillo, Susan Perez, and Joann Aguilar vs. Fair Oaks Country Store, LLC, pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Rosie Alvarado presiding.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certificate of Principal Executive Officer

pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of CNET Networks, Inc.
(CNET Networks) on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Neil M. Ashe, Chief Executive Officer of CNET Networks, Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CNET Networks.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: January 29, 2007
|                       
|/s/ Neil M. Ashe       
|Neil M. Ashe           
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CNET Networks and
will be retained by CNET Networks and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7124

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

KEVIN D. ALLEN, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, 

District Judge. (3:05-cr-00041-nkm-bwc-2) 

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: January 14, 2009 

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Kevin D. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Kevin D. Allen appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Allen, No. 

3:05-cr-00041-nkm-bwc-2 (W.D. Va. June 17 & 18, 2008). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED