alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,629,286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,011,992
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,230
<INVENTORY>                                  3,855,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,103,050
<PP&E>                                       4,619,844
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,915,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,395,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,359,303
<BONDS>                                        667,310
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       167,603
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,201,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,395,518
<SALES>                                     16,331,090
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,331,090
<CGS>                                        9,638,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,638,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,188,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             288,372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                604,569
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (175,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            779,569
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   779,569
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 15(a)**

**Consent of independent registered public accounting firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements (Form F-3 No. 333-108084 and Form S-8 Nos. 333-99785, 333-89508,333-104691, 333-126139, 333-181334 and 333-197846) of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC of our reports dated 17 February 2014, with respect to the Consolidated Financial Statements of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended 31 December 2013. 

**ERNST & YOUNG LLP**

**London, England**

February 25, 2015
Exhibit 10.14
                                      Description of Long Term Incentive Plan


         On February 18, 1994, the  Compensation  Committee  (the  "Compensation
Committee")  of the  Board of  Directors  of  Milestone  Properties,  Inc.  (the
"Company") adopted a long term incentive plan (the "LTIP") pursuant to which the
Company's two most senior  executive  officers,  Leonard S. Mandor and Robert A.
Mandor, are eligible to receive annual bonuses of 9% of the cumulative  adjusted
pre-tax profits of Milestone Asset  Management,  Inc.  ("MAMI"),  a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company. The purpose of the LTIP is to motivate and reward the
Company's two most senior executive officers for their  contributions in support
of the  achievement  of the  Company  and,  specifically,  of MAMI.  The LTIP is
administered by the Compensation Committee. The LTIP originally provided for the
availability  of such bonuses based on MAMI's  profitability  in 1994,  1995 and
1996, and was subsequently extended to cover 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Lance Cornell, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Transcend Services, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986]; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 1, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001015551
<NAME>                        Sprint Spectrum L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         71,600
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  70,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,800
<INVENTORY>                                    80,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               275,800
<PP&E>                                         2,980,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 161,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,531,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,299,500
<BONDS>                                        2,423,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,779,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,531,600
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,400
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  958,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             53,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (897,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (897,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (897,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Consortium Service
Management Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, K. Bruce Jones, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my
knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




****Date: April 22,
      2005
    By:
    /s/K. Bruce
  JonesK. Bruce JonesChief Financial
      Officer





The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.








Exhibit 32.1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10303

Summary Calendar

WILLIAM FREDRICK COLEMAN

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CV-1507

USDC No. 3:06-CV-1508

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

William Fredrick Coleman, Texas prisoner # 1175205, appeals the district

court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application for habeas relief, in which

Coleman challenged his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child. A

certificate of appealability (COA) was granted as to whether Coleman’s guilty

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 18, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10303

2

plea was voluntary. This court also directed the parties to address whether

Coleman’s application was time barred. 

Coleman devotes his entire appellate brief to the time bar issue and

merely concludes in his reply brief that his plea was involuntary and refers this

court to arguments he raised in previous district court pleadings. Even if

Coleman has not waived review of this issue, see Brinkmann v. Dallas County

Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987), he has failed to

demonstrate that his guilty plea was involuntary and that the district court

erred in denying him habeas relief based on the merits of this claim.

Resolution of the remaining question specified in the grant of the COA

regarding the timeliness of Coleman’s § 2254 application is therefore

unnecessary. See Scott v. Johnson, 227 F.3d 260, 262 (5th Cir. 2000). The

district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
1 NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

No . 124,413

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

S TATE OF K ANSAS , Appell ee ,

v.

T ABITHA J O E LLIOTT , Appell ant

.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appeal from McPherson District Court; J OHN B. K LENDA , judge. Opinion filed August 5 , 2022

. Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Submitted by the parties for summary disposition pursuant to K.S.A. 20 2 1 Supp. 21

- 6820(g)
and (h).

B efore W ARNER , P.J., H URST , J., and T IMOTHY G. L AHEY , S.J.

P ER C URIAM : Tabitha Jo Elliott contends the district court abused its discretion by imposing a 60

- day imprisonment sanction, rather than imposing available quick dip sanctions, after finding she violated the conditions of her probation. We granted Elliott ' s motion for summary disposition under Supreme Court Rule 7.041A (2022 Kan. S. Ct. R. at 48).

K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 22

- 3716(c)(11) allows a district court discretion, when faced with one or more probation violations, to impose either 60 days ' imprisonment or some
other graduated sanction. Elliott recognizes the district court ' s broad discretion, citing
State v. Ward , 292 Kan. 541, 256 P.3d 801 (2011) (district court abuses its discretion only when no reasonable person would agree with its decision or when it bases its2

de cision on an error of law or fact). And she notes that we do not have jurisdiction to otherwise review a presumptive sentence, as she received. See State v. Huerta , 291 Kan. 831, 247 P.3d 1043 (2011). We agree these decisions are controlling and dispositiv e of
the case. We thus affirm the district court.

Although not raised by either party, w e note t he district court used a 2021 journal entry of revocation form which incorrectly lists the 60

- day sanction as being authorized by K.S.A. 2021 Supp. 22

- 3716(c)( 9) , which is the current statutory section authorizing the imposition of the sanction. Because the crime of conviction was committed in late 2018, the proper statutory authorization for the sanction was K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 22

- 3716(c)(11) . Consequently, we di rect the d istrict c ourt to issue an o rder n unc p ro t unc correcting the statutory citation in the journal entry.

Affirmed and r emanded with directions

.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) by ProElite, Inc., (“Registrant”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report.





Date: November 18, 2011











/s/ Paul FellerPaul Feller

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Charles R. BearchellCharles R. Bearchell

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Richard Rubin, CEO, CFO and
Chairman of American Biogenetic Sciences, Inc, a Delaware corporation, hereby makes the
following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2007.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in
all respects, the financial condition of American Biogenetic Sciences, Inc. and results of
its operations.

Date: March 25, 2008/s/ Richard RubinCEO, CFO and Chairman
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 183 (Friday, September 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44484-44485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20215]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10133]

Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Object Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: Exhibition of ``The Seine near Rouen'' 
Object

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that a certain object entitled ``The Seine near 
Rouen,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at 
The J. Paul Getty Museum at the Getty Center, Los Angeles, California, 
from on or about October 1, 2017, until on or about February 28, 2018, 
and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, 
is in the national interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
information identifying the object, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office 
of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-
6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority

[[Page 44485]]

No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 
28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of 
December 11, 2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
determinations be published in the Federal Register.

Alyson Grunder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-20215 Filed 9-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Performance Elements for 2011 Executive Long-Term Incentive Program



 EXHIBIT 10(e)(20) 
 2011 Executive Long-Term Incentive Program (“2011 E-LTIP”) 
 Under the 2011 E-LTIP, executive
officers of the Company are eligible to receive performance shares based on certain performance measures established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”). 

The performance elements and corresponding weights for the 2011 E-LTIP are: (i) (10%) Revenue Growth: Revenue growth adjusted to exclude the impact of changes
in the translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars; (ii) (55%) Adjusted Earnings per Share: Diluted Earnings Per Share from Continuing Operations as reported in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, as
adjusted on an after-tax basis for the following discretely disclosed (in either Management’s Discussion and Analysis/MD&A or the footnotes to the financial statements) items (if equal to or greater than $50 million pre-tax on an individual
basis, or in the aggregate per item, with the exception of income tax and Fuji-Xerox adjustments): direct costs of acquisition and acquisition-related expenses; amortization of acquisition-related intangibles; restructuring and asset impairment
charges; gains/(losses) from litigation, regulatory matters or any changes in enacted law (including tax law); gains/(losses) from asset sales or business divestitures; gains/(losses) resulting from acts of war, terrorism or natural disasters; the
initial effect of changes in accounting principles that are included within Income from Continuing Operations; impairment of goodwill and other intangibles; gains/(losses) from the settlement of tax audits (if equal to or greater than $30 million on
an individual basis, or in the aggregate per item); gains/(losses) on early extinguishment of debt; non-restructuring related impairments of long-lived assets; and our share of after-tax effects of the above items incurred by Fuji-Xerox (if our
share is equal to or greater than $10 million on an individual basis, or in the aggregate per item); and (iii) (35%) Core Cash Flow from Operations: Net Cash provided by (used for) Operating Activities as reported in the Company’s
consolidated audited financial statements, as adjusted for the following items: net changes in finance receivables and on-lease equipment; with the exception of cash payments for restructurings, cash flow impacts (inflows and outflows) resulting
from the EPS adjustments as identified above whether or not the cash flow impact and the EPS impact are in the same fiscal year; cash payments for restructurings in excess of the amount reported as current restructuring reserves in the preceding
years Annual Report; and special discretionary pension fundings in excess of $50 million. Any other items approved by the Committee for adjustment of the above metrics will be considered a modification of the award.
**Exhibit 12(b)**
**302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Richard Solomons, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 28, 2008 By:  /s/ Richard Solomons    Name:  Richard Solomons    Title:  Finance Director