alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1998 and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,631
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,631
<PP&E>                                       4,284,356
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,033,143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,368
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     243,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,844
<SALES>                                       (14,752)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (14,648)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               268,419
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (283,067)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (283,067)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (283,067)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (23.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (23.94)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0506 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. EDWARD JEFFREY ALLEN ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 30, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 24 2022

10/24/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0506
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Registrant and Andrew H. Tisch



Exhibit 10.08


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	  	 February 15, 2011



 
 
 
 
 
 Mr. Andrew H. Tisch
 667 Madison Avenue
 New York, New York 10065
 
 

Dear Mr. Tisch:
  
 Reference is
made to your Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Loews Corporation (the "Company") dated February 25, 2008 (as amended, the "Employment Agreement").
 


 This will
confirm our agreement that the Employment Agreement is amended as follows:
 
 

1.  
   Term of Employment.  The period of your employment under and pursuant to the Employment Agreement is hereby extended for an additional period through and
including March 31, 2012 upon all the terms, conditions and provisions of the Employment Agreement, as hereby amended.
 
 

2.  
   Compensation.  You shall be paid as basic compensation (the "Basic Compensation") for your services to the Company and its subsidiaries under and pursuant to
the Employment Agreement a salary at the rate of Nine  Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand ($975,000) Dollars per annum through  March 31, 2012.  Basic Compensation shall be payable in accordance with the Company's customary
payroll practices as in effect from time to time, and shall be subject to such increases as the Board of Directors of the Company, in its sole discretion, may from time to time determine.


 
 3.     Incentive Compensation
Plan.  In addition to receipt of Basic Compensation under the Employment Agreement, you shall participate in the Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers of the Company (the “Compensation Plan”) and shall be
eligible to receive incentive compensation under the Compensation Plan as may be awarded in accordance with its terms.
 
 

4.  
   Other Compensation.  The compensation provided pursuant to this Letter Agreement shall be exclusive of compensation and fees, if any, to which you may be
entitled as an officer or director of a subsidiary of the Company.
 
 

Except as herein
modified or amended, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
 
  
  
 
 
  
  
 
 

   
 
 
 

Mr. Andrew H. Tisch

As of February 15, 2011

Page 2
 


  
 If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding, would you please sign the enclosed duplicate copy of this Letter Agreement at the place indicated below and return the
same to us for our records.
 
 
 
 
 
	  	 Very truly yours,
 
	  	  
	  	 LOEWS CORPORATION
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
	  	 By:
 	 /s/
Gary W. Garson
 
	  	  	 Gary W. Garson
 
	  	  	 Senior Vice President
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
	 ACCEPTED AND AGREED
TO:
 	      


	  	  
	 /s/
Andrew H. Tisch
 	  
	 Andrew H. Tisch
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, as
Chief Executive Officer of Transcend Services, Inc., certifies that to the undersigneds knowledge, the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transcend Services,
Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code.



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    LARRY G.
GERDES                                               
|Larry G. Gerdes Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 11, 2009
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, F IFTH DISTRICT, AT DALLAS

No. 05

- 16

- 01124

- CV

STEPHEN COURTNEY, M. D. AND PLANO ORTHOPE DICS SPORTS MEDICINE AND SPINE

CENTER, P.A.

V.

CHRISTEL PENNINGTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN HEIR AND REPRESE NTATIVE OF THE

ESTATE O F STEVEN PAUL PENNIN GTON, DECEASED

( Trial Court No. DC

- 16

- 03386 in the 162nd Judicial District Court of Dallas C ounty )

The c osts incurred on appeal to the F ifth Court of Appeals Dallas , Texas are below:

Fee Date Type of Fee Charges Paid Paid By

11/30/201 6

11/22/2016

10/24/2016

10/03/2016

10/03/2016

09/27/2016 Motion fee

Clerk's record

Motion fee

Reporter's record

Clerk's record

Filing $10.00

$40.00

$10.00

$360.00

$389.00

$205.00 E

- PAID

PAID

E

- PAID

PAID

PAID

E

- PAID GEORGIANA HOLLAND

COOPER & SCULLY

DIANA L FAUST

COOPER & SCULLY

STEPHEN COURTNEY, M. D. ETAL

DIANA L FAUST

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, LISA MATZ

, CLERK OF THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AT

DALLAS

, do h ereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTI MONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and

the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the F ifth

District of Texas, this January 31, 2018

.

/s/ LISA MATZ, Clerk of the Court
APPENDIX NO. 3 

SCHEDULE C POSITIONS

_______

Schedule C positions are excepted from the competitive service because of their confidential or

policy-determining character. Mostsuch positions are at grade 15 of the GeneralSchedule orlower. Schedule Cpositions

above the GS-15 level are either in the Senior Level (SL) personnel system or are specifically authorized in law. 

The decision concerning whether to place a position in Schedule C is made by the Director, U.S. Office of

Personnel Management, upon agency request. Such requests are considered on a case-by-case basis. In addition to

consideration of the justification submitted by the agency, OPM may conduct an independent review and analysis.In

addition to the Schedule Cpositions authorized by the OPM Director, a limited number of positions may be placed under

Schedule C by Executive Order of the President or by legislation. 

Requests for Schedule C exception are appropriate when: 

(1) The position involves making or approving substantive policy recommendations; or 

(2) The work of the position can be performed successfully only by someone with a thorough

knowledge of and sympathy with the goals, priorities, and preferences of an official who has a confidential or

policy determining relationship with the President or the agency head. There are special requirements for the

types of superiors who are eligible for Schedule C secretaries. 

The immediate supervisor of a Schedule Cposition must be a Presidential appointee, a Senior Executive Service

appointee (career or noncareer) occupying a Generalposition, or a Schedule Cappointee.The immediate supervisor may

not occupy a position in the competitive service or a Career Reserved position in the Senior Executive Service. 

The only time when OPM approval is not required for a Schedule C position is when a position is filled by a

temporary Schedule C appointment during a Presidential transition, a change of agency head, or establishment of a new

agency. Temporary Schedule C positions may be established for 120 days, with one extension of 120 days, under

conditions prescribed by OPM. There is a limit on the number of such positions that can be established by an agency.

New appointments may be made only during the 1-year period beginning on the date of the agency head's appointment,

a new Administration or establishment of a new agency. 

By law, the agency head must certify to OPM that both Schedule C and temporary Schedule C positions are

not being requested for the sole purpose of detailing the incumbent to the White House. 

Agencies may fill Schedule C positions noncompetitively. Because of the confidential or policy-determining

nature of Schedule C positions, the incumbents serve at the pleasure of the appointing authority (usually the agency

head) and may be removed at any time.They are not covered under conduct-based or performance-removal procedures

that apply to certain other excepted Service appointees. 

Schedule C positions authorized by OPM are automatically revoked when the incumbent leaves the position

(i.e., there is no such thing as a "vacant" Schedule C position). 

(326)
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 

LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 2009 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN 

This Amendment No. 1 to the Lawson Products, Inc. 2009 Equity Compensation Plan (as Amended and Restated Effective May 13, 2014)
(the “Plan”) is made effective as of the 9th day of April 2018. 
 Section 8.0 of the Plan is amended and restated to
read in its entirety as follows: 
 “8.0 Maximum Individual Awards 

The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be granted in any calendar year with respect to Awards under the Plan to any
single Participant (the “Grant Limitation”) shall be: (a) 125,000 to any Participant other than a Nonemployee Director, and (b) 20,000 to any Participant who is a Nonemployee Director. In the event of any adjustment under
Section 7.2 to the number of shares that may be issued under the Plan, the Grant Limitation shall be proportionately adjusted.”
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000407

15-MAR-2017

08:18 AM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0506

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

EDWARD JEFFREY ALLEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 30, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 24 2022

10/24/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0506
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15293 and #15294; U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Disaster 
Number VI-00009]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
U.S. Virgin Islands

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-4335-DR), dated 09/07/
2017.
    Incident: Hurricane Irma.
    Incident Period: 09/05/2017 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 09/15/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/06/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/07/2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the U.S. Virgin Islands, dated 09/07/2017, is hereby 
amended to re-establish the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning 09/05/2017 and continuing.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)


James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-20312 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00824-CV

Cindy Goodman, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 395TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. O4-1546-F395, HONORABLE MICHAEL JERGINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The trial court signed its final order terminating appellant Cindy Goodman’s parental

rights on December 14, 2005. Appellant timely filed her notice of appeal. On January 17, 2006, the

trial court signed an order denying appellant’s motion for appointing appellate counsel, finding that

appellant was not indigent so as to qualify for appointed counsel. The clerk’s record was due on

March 31, and on March 29, the district clerk’s office informed this Court that it had notified

appellant of the cost of the clerk’s record on January 23, but that appellant had not yet made

arrangements to pay for the record. On April 6, we sent notice that the record was overdue and that

the appeal was in jeopardy of being dismissed for want of prosecution. On May 5, appellant’s trial

counsel informed the Court that he had been discharged from the case and did not know how to

locate appellant. On May 11, we sent notice to appellant’s last two known addresses, informing her

that the record was overdue and that no arrangements had been made to pay for it. We requested that
2

appellant file a report explaining the status of the appeal, warning her that the appeal would be

dismissed if she did not respond by May 22. To date, appellant has not responded to the notice by

letter or other means. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution on our own motion.

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: June 9, 2006
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50159

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAIME PRIETO-MOLINAR,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 98-CR-447-2-H

--------------------

September 17, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jaime Prieto-Molinar appeals from his conviction by jury

verdict for one count each of conspiracy to possess and

possession with intent to distribute marijuana. Prieto-Molinar

contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his

conviction. Because Prieto-Molinar moved for a judgment of

acquittal at the close of the Government’s evidence and did not

present any evidence, we view all of the evidence and reasonable

inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the 
No. 99-50159

-2-

Government and affirm the judgment only if a rational trier of

fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond

a reasonable doubt. United States v. Ortega Reyna, 148 F.3d 540,

543 (5th Cir. 1998). The Government was required to prove three

elements in order to sustain the conviction for conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance: (1) an

agreement between two or more persons to violate the narcotics

laws, (2) that each alleged conspirator knew of the conspiracy

and intended to join it, and (3) that each alleged conspirator

did participate voluntarily in the conspiracy. United States v.

Inocencio, 40 F.3d 716, 725 (5th Cir. 1994). “The jury may infer

any element of this offense from circumstantial evidence." 

United States v. Lechuga, 888 F.2d 1472, 1476 (5th Cir. 1989). 

Thus, “[k]nowledge may be inferred from surrounding

circumstances." Lechuga, 888 F.2d at 1476-77 (citation and

quotation marks omitted). A conviction for the offense of

possession of marijuana with intent to distribute requires proof

that the defendant (1) knowingly (2) possessed marijuana (3) with

intent to distribute it. United States v. Lopez, 74 F.3d 575,

577 (5th Cir. 1996).

The Government adduced evidence at trial showing that a car

loaded with 47 pounds of marijuana in a hidden compartment

crossed into the United States via the Paso del Norte port of

entry and was left at a restaurant in El Paso, Texas, for pick

up. The evidence also showed that Prieto-Molinar retrieved the

car from that point and subsequently provided U.S. Customs

authorities with implausible and inconsistent information
No. 99-50159

-3-

concerning his connection to the loaded car. A rational jury

could infer from the evidence that Prieto-Molinar knowingly

conspired to possess and possessed with intent to distribute the

marijuana secreted in the car.

AFFIRMED.
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2947 

AN ACT 

To provide for the release of the reversionary interest held 

by the United States in certain land conveyed by the 

United States in 1950 for the establishment of an airport 

in Cook County, Minnesota. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2947 EH

1 SECTION 1. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST AND 

2 USE CONDITIONS, COOK COUNTY AIRPORT, 

3 COOK COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 

4 (a) RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST RE5 QUIRED.—The Secretary of Agriculture, acting on behalf 

6 of the United States, shall release, without consider7 ation— 

8 (1) the conditions imposed on the use of the 

9 parcel of land originally conveyed by the Secretary 

10 pursuant to section 16 of the Federal Airport Act 

11 (Act of May 13, 1946, ch. 251, 60 Stat. 170) to the 

12 State of Minnesota by deed executed May 31, 1950, 

13 for the establishment of an airport in Cook County, 

14 Minnesota; and 

15 (2) the reversionary interest retained by the 

16 United States in connection with such conditions. 

17 (b) INSTRUMENT OF RELEASE.—The Secretary of 

18 Agriculture shall execute and file in the appropriate office 

19 a deed of release, amended deed, or other appropriate in20 strument reflecting the release of the reversionary interest 

21 and conditions under subsection (a). 

Passed the House of Representatives April 24, 2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2947 

AN ACT 

To provide for the release of the reversionary internesota. lishment of an airport in Cook County, Min- veyed by the United States in 1950 for the estab- est held by the United States in certain land con-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-33-2017]

On May 8, 2017, the Port of Long Beach, California, grantee of FTZ 50, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board on behalf of Mercedes Benz USA, LLC, within Site 41 of FTZ 50.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the                           ( print page 45261)                        FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (82 FR 25239-25240, June 1, 2017). On September 5, 2017, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14, and further subject to a restriction that carpets of man-made fibers would be admitted to the FTZ in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41).                

Dated: September 22, 2017.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-20809 Filed 9-27-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P