alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EX PIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
P. G., FATHER OF J.T. AND M.T., CHILDREN , App ellant ,

v. Case No

. 5D 22 -7 07 LT Cas e No. 2019 -D P -0 00234 -A -X
D EP ART M ENT O F CHIL D REN AN D FA M I LI ES ,

Ap pe l l ee

.

_ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _/
Decision filed June 28, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County , Stacy M

. Y oumans , J udge. Shannon L. Reynolds, of Shannon L. Reynolds, P.A. , Ocala, for Appellant

. Rachel Batten, o f

C hildren’s Le gal Services, Brooksville, f or Appell ee

. Sara E lizabeth Goldfarb , Statewide Director of Appeals, and Amanda Victoria Glass, Senior Attorney, of S tatewide G uardian ad Litem Office , Tallahassee, for Statewide G uardian ad Litem

. PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.

COHEN , WALLIS and HARRIS , JJ. , conc ur.
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 14 - 00406 - CV
IN RE R OBERT RUIZ GUITIERRE Z, RELATOR OPINION ON ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS December 5, 2014 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Relator Robert Ruiz Guitierrez files this original proceeding for writ of habeas corpu s and contends that the twelve days between the time the trial court orally committed him to the Lynn County J ail in Tahoka, Texas , and actually signed a written decree ordering his commitment violated his due process rights. We agree and grant the writ for habeas relief. According t o the record, a hearing was held on May 30, 2014 . At the hearing, Guitierrez was found to be in contempt , and on that same day, the trial court directed him to “be jailed in the Lynn County jail until he posts a $70 ,000.00 cash bond.” The written order manifesting that oral pronouncement wa s signed on June 11, 2014, that is, approximately twelve days after Gutierrez was jailed.2

A person may not be imprisoned for contempt occurring outside the trial court’s presence without a written order of commitme nt. Ex parte Amaya, 748 S.W.2d 224, 224 (Tex. 1988) (orig. proceeding) ; In re Brown , 114 S.W.3d 7, 9 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2003, orig. proceeding)

. Nonetheless , a contemnor may be detai ned for a short , reasonable time via an oral directive while the written judgment of contempt and order of commitment are prepare d and executed

. Ex parte Amaya , 748 S.W.2d at 225

. However, our Supreme Court has held that a t wo or three day delay between commitment under a verbal command and execution of the requisite documents was not such a short and reasonable time. Id . This court has held that a four day delay was too long. E

x parte Morgan , 886 S.W.2d 829, 832 (Tex. App.

— A marillo 1994, orig. proce eding)

. Guitierrez was not found in contempt for an act occurrin g in the trial court’s presence. Thus, the trial court could not jail him for more than a short , r easonable period of time without a written order or judgment. The delay between the verbal directive and written decree at bar exceeded the periods found excessive and unreasonable in both Amaya and Morgan . Thus, Guitierrez’ detention viola ted due process, which violation rendered the judgment and order of commitment void. Ex parte Morgan , supra . Accordingly, w e grant the peti tion for writ of habeas c orpus and order Robert Ruiz Guitierrez discharged from confinement.

Brian Quinn Chief Justice
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2859 

To repeal Public Law 107–40. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 

Ms. LEE of California (for herself, Mr. JONES, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. GRIJALVA, 

Mr. HONDA, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. MCDERMOTT, 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Ms. EDWARDS, Mr. STARK, Mr. FILNER, and Ms. 

WATERS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal Public Law 107–40. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repeal of the Author5 ization for Use of Military Force’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDING. 

7 Congress finds that the Authorization for Use of Mili8 tary Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), 

9 signed into law on September 18, 2001, has been used 

10 to justify a broad and open-ended authorization for the 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2859 IH

1 use of military force and such an interpretation is incon2 sistent with the authority of Congress to declare war and 

3 make all laws for executing powers vested by the Constitu4 tion in the Government of the United States. 

5 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF PUBLIC LAW 107–40. 

6 Effective 180 days after the date of the enactment 

7 of this Act, the Authorization for Use of Military Force 

8 (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby re9 pealed. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,271
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                       482
<INVENTORY>                                     63,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,805
<PP&E>                                          36,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,040
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 273,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,833
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,705
<OTHER-SE>                                     164,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   273,560
<SALES>                                        242,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,457
<CGS>                                          117,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,836
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,838
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,998
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,941
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3383-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-3383-EM), dated September 5, 2017, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued September 18, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective September 7, 2017.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-20453 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3024 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3024

 To create a special class of H-2A workers who may be admitted to work 
       as sheepherders or dairy workers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 2011

 Mr. Hanna (for himself and Ms. Hochul) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To create a special class of H-2A workers who may be admitted to work 
       as sheepherders or dairy workers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Access to Agricultural Labor Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT STATUS FOR DAIRY WORKERS AND SHEEPHERDERS.

    Section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a)) is amended by inserting after 
``abandoning'' the following: ``who is coming temporarily to the United 
States to perform agricultural labor or services as a sheepherder or 
dairy worker, or''.

SEC. 3. SPECIAL RULE FOR PERIOD OF ADMISSION OF H-2A NONIMMIGRANTS 
              EMPLOYED AS SHEEPHERDERS OR DAIRY WORKERS.

    Section 218(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1188(h)) is amended by adding at the end of the following:
            ``(3) In the case of an alien admitted as an H-2A worker 
        for employment as a sheepherder of dairy worker--
                    ``(A) the initial period of admission shall be for 
                a period of 3 years;
                    ``(B) the period of admission may be extended for 
                additional periods of 3 years; and
                    ``(C) no period of absence from the United States 
                may be required as a condition of approval of an 
                extension under subparagraph (B).''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Transcend Services, Inc., certifies that to
the undersigneds knowledge, the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transcend Services, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Larry G. Gerdes    
|Larry G. Gerdes        
|Chief Executive Officer



Date: March 9, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANY SET FORTH IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,560
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,074
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,623
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,194
<PP&E>                                       1,198,298
<DEPRECIATION>                                 561,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 703,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,253
<BONDS>                                        277,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           291
<OTHER-SE>                                     323,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   703,307
<SALES>                                        106,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,278
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,752
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,430
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,653
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,777
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,777
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
                  --------------------------------------------

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Intellectual Technology,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the period ended  December  31,  2003,  I, Walter G.
Fuller, Chief Executive Officer,  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   This Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934; and

2.   The information contained in this Form 10-KSB for the period ended December
31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 14, 2004


                                           By:  /s/ Walter G. Fuller
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Walter G. Fuller
                                              Chief Executive Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 292 

To amend title 44, United States Code, to eliminate the mandatory printing 

of bills and resolutions by the Government Printing Office for the use 

of the House of Representatives and Senate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2011 

Mr. LEE of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend title 44, United States Code, to eliminate the 

mandatory printing of bills and resolutions by the Government Printing Office for the use of the House of 

Representatives and Senate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop the OverPrinting 

5 (STOP) Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 292 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF MANDATORY PRINTING OF BILLS 

2 AND RESOLUTIONS BY PUBLIC PRINTER FOR 

3 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATE. 

4 (a) ELIMINATION OF MANDATORY PRINTING.—Sec5 tion 706 of title 44, United States Code, is amended to 

6 read as follows: 

7 ‘‘§ 706. Bills and resolutions 

8 ‘‘(a) NO PRINTING OF BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS.— 

9 Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), the Public 

10 Printer shall make bills and resolutions available for the 

11 use of the House of Representatives and Senate only in 

12 an electronic format which is accessible through the Inter13 net. 

14 ‘‘(b) EXCEPTION FOR STANDING REQUEST OF COM15 MITTEE FOR BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS WITHIN JURIS16 DICTION.—If a committee (including a joint committee) 

17 of the House of Representatives or Senate, at any time 

18 during a Congress, requests the Public Printer to provide 

19 the committee with printed copies of each bill or resolution 

20 during the Congress that is within the committee’s juris21 diction, the Public Printer shall provide the committee 

22 with printed copies of each such bill or resolution, except 

23 that the aggregate number of printed copies of any bill 

24 or resolution provided pursuant to requests under this 

25 subsection may not exceed 75. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 292 IH

1 ‘‘(c) EXCEPTION FOR REQUEST OF MEMBERS OR

2 COMMITTEES FOR INDIVIDUAL BILLS OR RESOLU3 TIONS.—At the request of a Member (including a Delegate 

4 or Resident Commissioner to the Congress) or committee 

5 (including a joint committee) of the House of Representa6 tives or Senate, the Public Printer shall provide the Mem7 ber or committee with such number of printed copies of 

8 a bill or resolution as the Member or committee may re9 quest.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) shall take effect upon the expiration of the 

12 3-month period which begins on the date of the enactment 

13 of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
December 15, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WESTERN INTERNATIONAL GAS & CYLINDERS, INC. AND LORRIN 

WYNDELL SCRANTON, Appellants

NO. 14-11-00974-CV V.

ERNEST CLIFTON MAHON, III, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT 

EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF SHIRLEY FOREMAN MAHON, BROOKE 

MAHON LONGORIA, BLAKE JARRETT MAHON AND AGNES MCGEE 

FOREMAN, Appellees

____________________

Today the Court heard appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on September 13, 2011. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

July 03, 2009

Mr. John Christopher Nickelson

Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff & Miller, L.L.P.

777 Main Street, Suite 3800

Fort Worth, TX 76102

Mr. Russell J. Bowman

Scott Bowman & Stella

3131 McKinney Ave., Suite 220

Dallas, TX 75204

Mr. Michael W. Huddleston

Shannon Gracey Ratliff & Miller, L.L.P.

500 N. Akard Street, Suite 2500

Dallas, TX 75201

RE:Case Number:  06-1071

Court of Appeals Number:  05-05-00640-CV

Trial Court Number:  296-00088-05

Style:STATE FARM LLOYDS

v.

BECKY ANN JOHNSON

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  The judgment is enclosed.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like an opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@courts.state.tx.us or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure: Judgment

**Case No. 06-1071Page 2**
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aware, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael A. Tzannes                             /s/ Robert J. Weiskopf
----------------------                             ----------------------
Chief Executive Officer                            Chief Financial Officer


Date: May 10, 2005                                 Date: May 10, 2005


        The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document of the
Company or the certifying officers.


                                       29
No. 97-41240

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41240

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

BENITO GONZALEZ,

 Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-97-CR-125-3

--------------------

January 27, 2000

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Benito Gonzalez appeals his conviction for conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute marijuana. Gonzalez argues that

the evidence was insufficient to convict him. When the evidence,

both direct and circumstantial, is viewed in the light most

favorable to the jury’s verdict, the evidence was sufficient to

convict Gonzalez of each and every element of conspiracy to traffic

in narcotics. See United States v. Misher, 99 F.3d 664, 668 (5th

Cir. 1996); United States v. Dean, 59 F.3d 1479, 1485 (5th Cir.

1995); United States v. Resio-Trejo, 45 F.3d 907, 910 (5th Cir.
No. 97-41240

-2-

1995).

AFFIRMED.