alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.01

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of King Digital Entertainment plc (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Riccardo Zacconi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 13, 2015
|                       
|/s/ Riccardo Zacconi   
|Name:                   |  | Riccardo Zacconi       
|Title:                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 269 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit the 

conversion of leadership PAC funds to personal use. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2011 

Mr. CAPUANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit the conversion of leadership PAC funds to personal use. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Leadership PAC Limi5 tation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING CONVERSION OF LEADERSHIP PAC 

7 FUNDS TO PERSONAL USE. 

8 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 313(b)(1) of the Federal 

9 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 439a(b)(1)) is 

10 amended by inserting after ‘‘subsection (a)’’ the following: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 269 IH

1 ‘‘or funds of a leadership PAC (as defined in section 

2 304(i)(8)(B))’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to elections occur5 ring on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

QUINTON FERGUSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 267 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Exhibit
      32.2







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
§ 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Point.360 (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”), I, Alan R. Steel, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
              (d) of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







/s/
      Alan R.
      Steel


Alan
      R.
      Steel


Chief
      Financial Officer


May
      15,
      2007
Exhibit 32.1

      STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                     ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Mary Lynn D. Lenz, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Slade's Ferry Bancorp. (the "Company"). This statement is being
furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
            U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
            covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


March 31, 2006                         /s/ Mary Lynn D. Lenz
--------------------                   ------------------------------------
(Date)                                 Mary Lynn D. Lenz
                                       President/Chief Executive
                                       Officer/Interim Chairperson


<PAGE>
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 22, 2 024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24

- 0514 Lower Tribunal No. F 00

- 36825

________________



### Timothy Nelson Butler
,

Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida
, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Laura María González

- Marqués

, Judge.

Timothy Nelson Butler , in p roper person.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, LOBREE and BOKOR , JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry FLYNT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 84-5041.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 25, 1985.

William L. Webber, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Alan L. Isaacman, Cooper, Epstein & Hu-rewitz, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Before FLETCHER and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

The opinion in this case, filed March 28, 1985, 756 F.2d 1352, is hereby amended. The second paragraph of footnote 13 shall be deleted and replaced with the following paragraph:

> In addition, we note that had proper procedures been followed, the plenary adjudication of Flynt’s contempt charges would have taken place before another judge since Flynt’s remarks constituted highly personal derogatory attacks leveled at Judge Real. Where plenary adjudication is appropriate, and where the alleged contempt has in it the element of personal attack, due process ordinarily requires that the defendant be tried before a judge other than the one reviled by the contemnor. *See Mayberry v. Pennsylvania,*400 U.S. 455, 466 [91 S.Ct. 499, 505, 27 L.Ed.2d 532] (1971); *Taylor v. Hayes,*418 U.S. [488] at 501 [94 S.Ct. 2697 at 2704, 41 L.Ed.2d 897]; *cf.*Fed.R.Crim.P. 42(b).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUILLERMO MOJARRO, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

 v. 

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL 

REVENUE, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

No. 15-72153 

Tax Ct. No. 1492-14 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted April 11, 2017**

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Guillermo Mojarro appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s judgment following 

a bench trial concluding that a $250,000 payment that Mojarro received under a 

settlement agreement was not excludable from his gross income and assessing 

penalties. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-72153 

the Tax Court’s legal conclusions, and for clear error its factual findings. DJB 

Holding Corp. v. Comm’r, 803 F.3d 1014, 1022 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.

The Tax Court properly concluded that, with the exception of $1,500 paid 

for medical treatment for Mojarro’s emotional distress, Mojarro’s $250,000 

settlement was not made on account of “physical injuries or physical sickness” and 

was therefore not excludable from Mojarro’s gross income. 26 U.S.C. § 104(a)(2) 

(exempting settlement payment based on physical injuries or physical sickness 

from taxation, but not treating emotional distress as a physical injury or physical 

sickness); Rivera v. Baker W., Inc., 430 F.3d 1253, 1256-57 (9th Cir. 2005) (setting 

forth framework for determining when settlement proceeds qualify for a 

§ 104(a)(2) exclusion and explaining that there must be a “direct causal link” 

between damages and personal injuries).

The Tax Court did not clearly err in concluding that Mojarro failed to 

produce sufficient evidence that he acted with reasonable cause and in good faith, 

and thus properly concluded that Mojarro was ineligible for the exception under 

§ 6664(c)(1) for his substantial underpayment of income tax. See 26 U.S.C. 

§ 6662(a), (b)(2) (authorizing penalty for any substantial understatement of income 

tax); id. § 6662(d)(1)(A) (defining substantial understatement); DJB Holding 

Corp., 803 F.3d at 1022, 1028-31 (setting forth standards of review and discussing 

penalties under § 6662 based on substantial underpayment and circumstances for 
3 15-72153 

applying exception under § 6664(c)(1) regarding whether taxpayer had reasonable 

cause for his position and acted in good faith). 

The Tax Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Mojarro’s motion for 

reconsideration because Mojarro did not establish grounds for relief. See 

Parkinson v. Comm’r, 647 F.2d 875, 876 (9th Cir. 1981) (standard of review).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2824 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2824

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit physical 
    therapy services to be furnished under the Medicare Program to 
                individuals under the care of a dentist.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 19, 2011

 Mr. Reichert (for himself and Mr. Pascrell) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 
  in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit physical 
    therapy services to be furnished under the Medicare Program to 
                individuals under the care of a dentist.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Oral Health Rehabilitative 
Enhancement Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING PHYSICAL THERAPY TO BE FURNISHED UNDER THE MEDICARE 
              PROGRAM UNDER THE CARE OF A DENTIST.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(p)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395w(p)(1)) is amended by inserting ``(2),'' after ``(1),''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to items and services furnished on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7914

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHADRIQUEZ DEVON WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Danville. Michael F. Urbanski, 

District Judge. (4:09-cr-00039-MFU-RSB-1; 4:13-cv-80576-SGWRSB)

Submitted: August 4, 2016 Decided: August 26, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chadriquez Devon Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew 

Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, 

Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Chadriquez Devon Williams appeals the district court’s 

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. 

Chadriquez, Nos. 4:09-cr-00039-MFU-RSB-1; 4:13-cv-80576-SGW-RSB 

(W.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.55





Exhibit 10.55




Summary of Certain Executive Officer and Director Compensation Arrangements




Named Executive Officer Salary and Bonus Information




The following table presents the base salaries as of February 18, 2011 of our named executive
officers serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2010.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Salary	 
	Louis A. Raspino
	 	$	950,000	 
	Imran Toufeeq
	 	$	520,000	 
	W. Gregory Looser
	 	$	445,000	 
	Brian C. Voegele
	 	$	440,000	 
	Kevin C. Robert
	 	$	375,000	 
	Lonnie D. Bane
	 	$	370,000	 






Under our annual incentive compensation plan for 2010, bonuses for executive officers will be paid
in 2011 based on the level of achievement of specific objectives established by our Compensation
Committee. The objectives under the plan for 2010 (with target weight) consist of earnings per
share (25%), control of operating and general and administrative expense (15%), operating
efficiency (10%), free cash flow (20%), safety performance on a company-wide basis (10%), and
personal performance goals (20%). Target bonuses payable for 2010 as a percentage of base salary
for the persons named above are as follows: Mr. Raspino—100%; Mr. Toufeeq—70%; Mr. Looser—65%;
Mr. Voegele—65%; Mr. Robert—60% and Mr. Bane—60%. The maximum bonus equals two times the target
bonus.



Nonemployee Director Fees




The annual retainer for the chairman of the board is $180,000 and for each other director who is
not an employee of our company is $50,000. We pay a fee of $2,000 for each board and committee
meeting attended. For committee meetings, the fee is payable to all nonemployee directors
participating, regardless of committee membership, except to a director who is not a member of the
committee that does not receive the advance materials, if any, circulated to the committee members.
In addition, the chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual fee of $15,000; the chairman of
the Compensation Committee receives an annual fee of $15,000; and the chairman of the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee receives an annual fee of $10,000. Directors who are employees
receive no additional compensation for serving on the board of directors or its committees.
#### Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, Respondent, v Bernice Perez, Appellant.

Submitted January 28, 2008;

decided March 18, 2008

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]; *Eaton v State of New York,*76 NY2d 824 [1990]).
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification is intended to accompany U.S. Plastic Lumber Corp.'s (the
"Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. To the best of my knowledge, I, Mark S. Alsentzer, hereby certify in my
capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                       /s/ MARK S. ALSENTZER
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       MARK S. ALSENTZER
                                       Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 14, 2002
<PAGE>   1




DYNAMEX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
(In Thousands except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended    Nine Months Ended    
                                               April 30,               April 30,             April 30,        
                                        -------------------------   -----------------    -----------------    
                                         1996      1996     1997     1996      1997       1996      1997       
                                        -------   ------  -------   ------   --------    -------  --------    
                                                 Pro forma                                   Pro forma
<S>                                      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>        <C>       <C>      <C>      
Net Income                               $  475   $  612   $1,168   $  390     $2,130    $  890    $2,540     
                                         ======   ======   ======   ======     ======    ======    ======    
                                                                                                             
Weighted Average Common shares                                                                               
   Outstanding                            2,543    3,845    6,961    2,543      6,462     3,845     6,701    
                                                                                                             
Common Share Equivalents Related to                                                                          
   Options and Warrants                   1,189      648      109    1,189        187       648       159    
                                         ------   ------   ------   ------     ------    ------    ------    
                                                                                                             
Common Shares and Common Share                                                                               
   Equivalents                            3,732    4,493    7,070    3,732      6,649     4,493     6,860    
                                         ======   ======   ======   ======     ======    ======    ======    
                                                                                                             
Common Stock Price used under Treasury                                                                       
   Stock Method                          $ 8.00   $ 8.00   $ 7.94   $ 8.00     $ 9.22    $ 8.00    $ 9.22    
                                                                                                             
Net Income per Common Share              $ 0.13     0.14     0.17   $ 0.10       0.32    $ 0.20      0.37    
                                         ======   ======   ======   ======     ======    ======    ======    
</TABLE>


                                       15
Order filed July 18 , 2018

In The 

### Court of Appeals

For The 

### First District of Texas

___________ NO. 01

- 17

- 00488

- CV

____________ ROBERT GULLEDGE AND DIANA GULLEDGE , Appellant
V.
WARREN WESTER AND THEODORE SULLIVAN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 10th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 16

- CV

- 1022



### ORDER This court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of the following document :

• Plaintiff’s Exhibit 47

.The exhibit clerk of the 10th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk

of this court the original of the identified document , on or before July 25, 2018
. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe th e s e original exhibit s ; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of the identified documents , to t he clerk of the 10th District Court.

PER CURIAM