alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Protein Polymer Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ William N. Plamondon, III

William N. Plamondon, III

Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2006

In connection with the Annual Report of Protein Polymer Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Janis Y. Neves            

Janis Y. Neves

Director of Finance and Assistant Secretary

March 31, 2006

 

 

 
|   | -i- |   |
|--------|-----|--------|
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Charles R. Eitel, as Chief Executive Officer of Simmons Bedding Company (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

            (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
      ended March 27, 2004 (the "Report"), being filed with the U.S. Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: August 10, 2004                          /s/ Charles R. Eitel
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Name: Charles R. Eitel
                                               Title:  Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simmons Bedding Company and will be retained by Simmons Bedding
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### Ashby Lee BIEDLER v. Henry A. HURST and Henry A. Hurst, Jr.

Civ. A. No. 20185.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Sept. 3, 1958.

*334Tom P. Monteverde, Philadelphia, Pa. (Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis), Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Francis W. Sullivan and Edwin Barnet, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

LEAHY, District Judge.

1. Plaintiff has a new theory for recovery. He wants to amend his complaint. Rule 15 of The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., says he should. Also Moore1 agrees. F.R. 15 (c) abolishes any defense of intervening statute of limitations between amendments to pleadings.2 Moreover, it is valid for a litigant to change his theory of recovery.3 Delay in amendment hardly works prejudice.3a

2. The proposed amendments do not involve validity of the asserted claim. Here the proposed amendment shows, it is said, an agreement involving an usurious demand. Courts have rejected such arguments.4

3. If plaintiff wants to amend he should be allowed to.

An appropriate order should be submitted.

4

. Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp., D.C., 15 F.R.D. 354, affirmed 7 Cir., 229 F.2d 714, 59 A.L.R.2d 159; Cravatts v. Klozo Fastener Corp., D.C., 15 F.R.D. 12; Naamloze Vennootschap Suikerfabriek “Wono-Aseh” v. Chase National Bank, D.C., 12 F.R.D. 261. Look at Snyder v. Dravo Corp., D.C., 6 F.R.D. 546.

1

. 3 Moore’s Fed.Practice, p. 828.

2

. See Copeland Motor Co. v. General Motors Corp., 5 Cir., 199 F.2d 566; Green v. Walsh, D.C., 21 F.R.D. 15; Batkiewicz v. Seas Shipping Company, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 53 F.Supp. 802.

3

. Busam Motor Sales v. Ford Motor Co., 6 Cir., 203 F.2d 469; Snyder v. Dravo Corp., D.C., 6 F.R.D. 546.

3a

. Copeland Motor Co. v. General Motors Corp., supra; Heay v. Phillips, 9 Cir., 201 F.2d 220; Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co., D.C.W.D.Pa., 101 F.Supp. 549. See, also, Stepp v. United States, 4 Cir., 207 F.2d 909; Armstrong Cork Co. v. Patterson-Sargent Co., D.C., 10 F.R.D. 534.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00317-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I.D., MINOR 

CHILD

------------

FROM THE 233RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 233-562379-14

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion to Dismiss.” It is the court’s 

opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ. 

DELIVERED: October 13, 2016

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS

S ECOND D ISTRICT OF T EXAS

CHIEF JUSTICE

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICES

ELIZABETH KERR

J. WADE BIRDWELL

DABNEY BASSEL

DANA WOMACK

MIKE WALLACH

BRIAN WALKER TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER

401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000

FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76196

- 0211

TEL: (817) 884

- 1900

FAX: (817) 884

- 1932

www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa CLERK

DEBRA SPISAK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

LISA M. WEST

GENERAL COUNSEL

CLARISSA HODGES

April 6, 2023

Emma Guzman Ramon

Law O ffice of Emma Guzman Ramon

222 E. McKinney St., Ste. 210

Denton, TX 76201

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Rick Daniel

Assistant District Attorney

Denton County District Attorney's Office

1450 E. McKinney St., Ste. 3100

Denton, TX 76209

- 4524

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAI L *

Hon. David L. Evans

Regional Presiding Judge

Tom Vandergriff Civil Courts Building

100 N. Calhoun, 4th Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Sherry Shipman

Judge, 16th District Court

Denton County

1450 E. McKinney St.

Denton, TX 762 09

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Criminal District Clerk, Denton County

1450 E. McKinney St.

Denton, TX 76209

- 4524

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02

- 21

- 00128

- CR, 02

- 21

- 00129

- CR

Trial Court Case Number: F

- 2006

- 1489

- A, F

- 2006

- 1490

- A

St yle: Jose Arriaza

v.

The State of Texas

Today the Second Court of Appeals issued an opinion and judgment in the

above

- referenced cause. Copies of t he opinion and judgment are attached and can

also be viewed on our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa

.02

- 21

- 00128

- CR

Apr il 6, 2023

Page 2

Respectfully yours,

DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors andshareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the"Company"), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loanoutsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial taxservice provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and forthe year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v),1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicableservicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicingactivities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errorsthat may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may haveaffected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Companyserved as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all materialrespects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F: 214-712-6660,*www.pwc.com
ex10-25.htm


Exhibit 10.25


 


 



Waiver and Release







 


This Waiver (this “Waiver”) is made as of October 27, 2010, between CleanTech Innovations, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Wenge Chen (“Chen”).


 


In consideration of the release by the Company below, Chen hereby consents and agrees to waive all rights to the payment of RMB 5,690,100 due under the Approval on Share Transfer Regarding Creative Bellows Manufacture Co., Ltd., dated September 15, 2010, from the Department of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation of Liaoning Province.


 


In consideration for the execution of the Waiver, Company does hereby release and forever discharge Chen and his successors and assigns of and from all claims, actions, causes of action, liability, demands and damages of whatever name or nature, whether at law or in equity, in any manner having arisen, arising, or to arise from the beginning of time to the date hereof.


 







 


 


CLEANTECH INNOVATIONS, INC.


 


/s/ Bei Lu                                                                                                      


By: Bei Lu


Chairman & Chief Executive Officer


 







/s/ Wenge Chen                                                                                                     


Wenge Chen
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANY SET FORTH IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,138
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,788
<PP&E>                                         719,713
<DEPRECIATION>                                 255,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 505,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,589
<BONDS>                                        135,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           239
<OTHER-SE>                                     269,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   505,443
<SALES>                                         32,884
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,084
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,908
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,185
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,723
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,723
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David K. Jones, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2016 of Iconix Brand Group, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 1, 2017                                                  
|                                                                   
|/s/ David K. Jones                                                 
|David K. Jones
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Opinion issued August 22 , 201 9

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 9
- 00 108
- CV

————————

— —— CEDRICK JEROME BASS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

O n Appeal from the 1 13 th District Court

Harris County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 201 4
- 47611

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P.
42. 1 (a)(1). No other party has filed a notice of appea l and n o opinion has issued. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(c). Further , although appellant failed to include a certificate
of conference in h is motion, appellant’s motion includes a certificate of service,2

m o re than 10 days have passed since the motion was fi led, and no party has responded to the motion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pen d ing motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices K eyes and Higley

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0512

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CLOVIS CHRISTOPHER GENO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Kimberly Kurtz is 

granted an extension of time to and including June 13, 2022, within 

which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 8 2022

06/08/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0512
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-68084, 33-83276 and 33-91150 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos.
33-56704, 33-56706, 33-61884 and 33-80945 on Form S-8 of Creative BioMolecules,
Inc. of our report dated February 21, 1997, appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Creative BioMolecules, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachsuetts
March 27, 1997
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CALIPER LIFESCIENCES, INC.

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ThomasT. Higgins, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Companycertify, pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|        | /s/ THOMAS T. HIGGINS                                 |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas T. Higgins                                     |   |
|   | Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

Date:   August 9, 2006

1

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
     **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF THE REGISTRANT,PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamex Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “COMPANY”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “REPORT”),Ray E. Schmitz, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ RAY E. SCHMITZRay E. SchmitzVice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 8, 2004
This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
</LEGEND>
                       
                    
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   jun-30-1996
<CASH>                                         449,912
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  607,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    776,874
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,823,315
<PP&E>                                         760,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,279,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,128,942
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,750
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,136,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,279,111
<SALES>                                        6,439,381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,439,381
<CGS>                                          6,102,115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  543,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (16,645)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,964
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (202,530)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (202,530)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (202,530)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.05)
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with this Report on Form 10-Q of AVAX Technologies, Inc. (the
        “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Francois R.
        Martelet, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
        the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
        knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
   /s/
                  Francois R. MarteletFrancois
                  R. MarteletPresident
                  and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                  Executive Officer andPrincipal
                  Financial Officer)November
                  19, 2008