alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
LOSS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         129,207
<SECURITIES>                                 4,382,147
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    184,955
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,752,728
<PP&E>                                         212,197<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,964,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          322,714
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,851
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,610,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,964,925
<SALES>                                         32,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,814
<CGS>                                           30,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               393,913
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (314,211)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (314,211)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.11)
<FN>
<F1>NET AMOUNTS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Charles & Colvard, Ltd.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert S. Thomas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert S. Thomas                 
|Robert S. Thomas                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 10, 2004
Unassociated Document


 



Exhibit 10.13




 



Approval on Solutions Relating to Start-up Capital for Henan Jinding Chemical Co., Ltd.







According to the reports from the management of Henan Jinding Chemical Co., Ltd. (“Jinding”), after the Spring Festival, with the peak season of consumption of fertilizer and downstream enterprises of methanol resuming production, the market conditions will further improved for the products of Jinding. Meanwhile, the purchase price of raw coal decreased as the temperature is rising and coal production has started. Equipment condition and the staffing are ready to start production at any time. The only problem is lack of start-up capital. According to this circumstance, I requested a subsidiary of our group to lend short-term loan of RMB 20M to Jinding for one year. The loan is expected to be
placed by the end of February, 2011 and no later than early March as start‐up capital.







Xinyang Hongchang Group


CEO:  Chen Siqiang


February 19, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

EXCELON CORPORATION                                                 Exhibit 27.1
Financial Data Schedule

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                15,362
<SECURITIES>                                           4,976
<RECEIVABLES>                                         14,914
<ALLOWANCES>                                           1,206
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      35,330
<PP&E>                                                13,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                         8,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        48,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 18,044
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                  29
<OTHER-SE>                                            29,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          48,064
<SALES>                                               10,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      17,004
<CGS>                                                    633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          4,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      13,662
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (710)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (710)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (710)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.02)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7123

CURTIS J. BROWN, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JIM HODGES, Governor,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-00-1804-3-18AJ)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 6, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis J. Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

July 21, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on July 25, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58

and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date

that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis J. Brown, Sr., a South Carolina inmate, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find that

this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Hodges, No. CA00-1804-3-18AJ (D.S.C. July 25, 2000).* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Adult Home at Erie Station, Inc., Respondent, v Assessor and Board of Assessment Review of City of Middletown et al., Appellants.

Submitted February 4, 2008;

decided February 7, 2008

Motion by New York State Assessor Association for leave to *730file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein dismissed as untimely *(see*Rules of Ct of Appeals [22 NYCRR] § 500.23 [a] [3]).
#### Kellis Djon JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Reginald I. Lloyd, United States Attorney; Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Parole Chairman; Matthew B. Hammidullah, Warden, Custodian, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 07-6988.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 23, 2008.

Kellis Djon Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kellis Djon Jackson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Jackson v. United States,*No. 9:06-cv-02048-RBH (D.S.C. June 8, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
#### Batsaihan PURVEEGIIN, Appellant v. Secretary Michael CHERTOFF, of the Department of Homeland Security; Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of America; Thomas Decker, District Director Philadelphia field Office Deportation Detention Ice; Jacqueline Osterlind; Craig Lowe, Warden, Pike County Correctional Facility.

No. 07-2029.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) May 12, 2008.

Filed May 29, 2008.

Batsaihan Purveegiin, Mongolia, for pro se.

Daryl Ford Bloom, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Harrisburg PA, for Michael Chertoff.

Before AMBRO, FUENTES and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*150OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In May 2006, Batsaihan Purveegiin filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania challenging his detention during his removal proceedings. In January 2007, Purveegiin filed a petition for review of an order of removal entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and a motion to stay removal which were docketed in this Court at No. 07-1227.1 On March 5, 2007, after Purveegiin had been inadvertently removed to Mongolia while his stay motion was pending, the District Court dismissed the § 2241 petition as moot. Purveegiin remains in Mongolia.2 Purveegiin filed a timely notice of appeal, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We exercise plenary review over the District Court’s ruling on mootness. *Belitskus v. Pizzingrilli,*343 F.3d 632, 639 (3d Cir.2003). Because Purveegiin is no longer in custody, we agree with the District Court that his § 2241 petition is moot. *See In re Cantwell,*639 F.2d 1050, 1053 (3d Cir.1981) (“[A]n appeal will be dismissed as moot when events occur during the pendency of the appeal which prevent the appellate court from granting any effective relief.”) If in the future Purveegiin is returned to the United States and detained, he can file a new § 2241 petition challenging that detention.3

For the above reasons, we will affirm the District Court’s March 5, 2007 order.

1

. Counsel was appointed for Purveegiin, and the petition has been stayed pending this Court's *en banc*decision in *Pieire v. Attorney General,*No. 06-2496.

2

. On March 13, 2007, we ordered the government to return Purveegiin to the United States. According to the government’s most recent status report, the negotiations between the government and Purveegiin for his return stalled because Purveegiin insisted that the government obtain a Mongolian passport for him and did not want to be detained upon his return to the United States.

3

. In April 2007, Purveegiin filed a motion in No. 07-1227 requesting that he not be detained upon his return to the United States. We denied his request and noted that appointed counsel could file a motion for bail or release if counsel deemed such a motion to be nonfrivolous.
mobi_ex106.htm



EXHIBIT 10.6






 


AMENDED PROMISSORY NOTE







Principal amount:  $110,200.00







Date:   July 13, 2010







The undersigned hereby promises to pay Andreas Wilcken, Jr. the sum of One Hundred and Ten Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($110,200) representing the following advances from Mr. Wilcken on the following dates:







April 8, 2010 - $28,600.00


 


May 5, 2010 - $71,600.00


 


July 13, 2010 - $10,000.00


 


For a total of $110,200.00







This Note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum and is payable out of the first funds which the undersigned is entitled to retain under the Production Agreement and Royalty Agreement as further described in the undersigned’s registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC; provided, however, that notwithstanding the foregoing, no payments shall be made unless Moving Box, Inc. has sufficient funds to pay its operating expenses prior to making any payments on this Note.  Payments on this Note shall only be made to the extent and in amounts above the amounts Moving Box, Inc. must retain to pay its operating expenses on an on-going basis.  Any unpaid principal and interest on this Note is due July 13, 2020.







The undersigned and all other parties to this note, whether as endorsers, guarantors or sureties, agree to remain fully bound until this note shall be fully paid and waive demand, presentment and protest and all notices hereto and further agree to remain bound notwithstanding any extension, modification, waiver, or other indulgence or discharge or release of any obligor hereunder or exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as security for this note. No modification or indulgence by any holder hereof shall be binding unless in writing; and any indulgence on any one occasion shall not be an indulgence for any other or future occasion. Any modification or change in terms, hereunder granted by any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon each of the undersigned, notwithstanding the acknowledgement of any of the undersigned, and each of the undersigned does hereby irrevocably grant to each of the others a power of attorney to enter into any such modification on their behalf. This note shall take effect as a sealed instrument and shall be construed, governed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada.







Moving Box, Inc.


 




	
By: 

	/s/  Andreas Wilcken, Jr., Pres.	 
	 	Andreas Wilcken, Jr., Pres.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          17,352
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                       812
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,093
<PP&E>                                           5,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,692
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,229
<SALES>                                          8,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,563
<CGS>                                            1,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,046
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  70
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,170)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,170)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,170)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 13, 1896.)

Appeal from Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

James L. Bennett, for the United States.

Jesse Johnson, in pro. per.

PER CURIAM.

The questions of law arising in these cases will be certified to the supreme court. Counsel may prepare and submit proposed statements of facts in the usual form, such statements to contain, in substance, the findings of the circuit court, and also the facts touching adjustment of the claim relied upon as a counterclaim.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2477 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2477

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish a Department of 
   Veterans Affairs Medal for Distinguished Public Service to honor 
 veterans who make remarkable and distinguished contributions to their 
                              communities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2011

 Mr. McIntyre introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish a Department of 
   Veterans Affairs Medal for Distinguished Public Service to honor 
 veterans who make remarkable and distinguished contributions to their 
                              communities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDAL FOR DISTINGUISHED 
              PUBLIC SERVICE.

    (a) Establishment.--Subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 533. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDAL FOR DISTINGUISHED 
              PUBLIC SERVICE.

    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may award a decoration called the 
`Department of Veterans Affairs Medal for Distinguished Public Service' 
to a veteran described in subsection (b).
    ``(b) Veteran Described.--A veteran described in this subsection is 
a veteran whom the Secretary determines has, during the period after 
the date of the veteran's discharge or release from the active 
military, naval, or air service--
            ``(1) made remarkable and distinguished contributions to 
        the community of the veteran; and
            ``(2) exemplified the virtues of honor, duty, and 
        commitment to service that originally led the veteran to 
        service in the Armed Forces.
    ``(c) Posthumous Award.--The Secretary may award the medal under 
this section to a veteran described in subsection (b) who is deceased.
    ``(d) Regulations.--The Secretary may prescribe regulations to 
carry out this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter of such title is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 532 the following new item:

``533. Department of Veterans Affairs Medal for Distinguished Public 
                            Service.''.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 24, 2021

No. 04-21-00451-CV

Kody KOTHMANN, as Trustee of the Kody Kothmann 1992 Irrevocable Trust,

Appellant

v.

Carl MENZIES and Steve Menzies, as Trustee of the Perry P. Menzies and Mary Louise 

Menzies Living Trust,

Appellees

From the 452nd District Court, Menard County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-05655

Honorable Robert Hoffman, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On November 9, 2021, we advised Appellant that the complained of order did not appear 

to be a final order, and we ordered Appellant to show cause why we have jurisdiction in this 

appeal.

Appellant’s timely response acknowledged that the order was not final. Appellant moved 

to dismiss the appeal, or in the alternative, asked for additional time for the district court to sign a 

final judgment. 

We granted Appellant’s motion for additional time for the trial court to sign a final 

judgment, which it did on November 17, 2021, and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the 

final judgment was filed on November 24, 2021.

We REINSTATE this appeal on this court’s docket. We set Appellant’s brief due on 

December 27, 2021. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of November, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court