alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44632-44633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20463]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4332-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Texas; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the

[[Page 44633]]

State of Texas (FEMA-4332-DR), dated August 25, 2017, and related 
determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 12, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
August 25, 2017.

    Bee and Refugio Counties for Public Assistance [Categories C-G] 
(already designated for Individual Assistance and assistance for 
debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and 
B], including direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance 
program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-20463 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

State of Texas, Appellant

No. 06-12-00174-CR v.

David Kent Smith, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court of Fannin 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 40539). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Carter and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 20, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief FinancialOfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (the “Company”)for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kent W. Stanger, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: March 10,  2010 | /s/ Kent W. Stanger                                     |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Kent W. Stanger                                         |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial  officer) |

 

This certificationaccompanies the foregoing Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this certificationhas been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00495-CR

GERALD L. BRADLEY APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 0918827D

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

On December 3, 2014, Appellant Gerald L. Bradley filed a notice of appeal

from the trial court’s August 21, 2014 orders denying his “Motion of Request to 

Reverse Conviction for Improper Grand Jury Procedures” and his “Motion to 

Show-Cause Order.” On December 18, 2014, we notified Bradley that it appears 

we lack jurisdiction over this matter because the notice of appeal was not timely 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). We advised that this appeal could be 

dismissed unless he, or any party desiring to continue the appeal, filed a 

response showing grounds for continuing the appeal on or before December 29, 

2014. Bradley filed a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the 

appeal. 

This court does not have authority to grant an out-of-time appeal. See 

Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Additionally, 

unless expressly authorized by statute, appellate courts have jurisdiction to 

review only final judgments of conviction in criminal cases. Apolinar v. State, 820 

S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 

44.02 (West 2006) (“A defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal 

under the rules hereinafter prescribed . . . .”). This court does not have 

jurisdiction to review the denial of Bradley’s post-judgment motions.2

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P.

43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

 

2On January 29, 2015, we received a pro se letter from Bradley. We 

interpret his letter as a motion requesting that this court appoint counsel for him 

and order the trial court to provide him a record and make certain findings and 

conclusions. Because we determine that we lack jurisidiction, we deny Bradley’s 

motion.
3

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: February 5, 2015
EXHIBIT 21.1      LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>

                                                                                NAME(S) UNDER WHICH SUBSIDIARY
                       SUBSIDIARY                   STATE / JURISDICTION            IS CONDUCTING BUSINESS
                       ----------                   --------------------            ----------------------

      <S>                                           <C>                    <C>
      Hostmark World Limited                        United Kingdom         Worldport, Hostmark World
      Hostmark U.K. Limited                         United Kingdom         Worldport, Hostmark U.K.
      Hostmark AB                                   Sweden                 Worldport, Hostmark AB
      Hostmark GmbH                                 Germany                Worldport, Hostmark GmbH
      Worldport Ireland Limited                     Ireland                Worldport Ireland Limited; Worldport
                                                                           Ireland; Worldport
      Worldport Europe Limited                      Ireland                n/a
      VIS-able America, Inc.                        Delaware               Worldport; VIS-able America, Inc.
      Ballou Internet Services, Inc.                Delaware               Worldport; Ballou Internet Services, Inc.
      VIS-able U.K., Inc.                           United Kingdom         VIS-able U.K., Inc.
      Worldport Holdings, Inc.                      Delaware               n/a
      Worldport International, Inc.                 Delaware               n/a
      Worldport Acquisitions, Inc.                  Delaware               n/a
      Worldport Acquisitions, Corp.                 Delaware               n/a
      Worldport / ICX, Inc.                         Delaware               n/a
      Worldport Distributions NV                    Netherlands            n/a
      Worldport Communications (Europe) BV          Netherlands            n/a



</TABLE>
Amendment #2 to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.65 
 AMENDMENT #2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS
AMENDMENT #2 (this “Amendment”) is made as of the 30th day of March, 2010, by and between Brian H. McCurrie (“Executive”) and Koppers Inc. (the “Company”). 
 WHEREAS, Executive and the Company entered into an employment contract setting forth the terms and conditions of Executive’s employment with the Company on October 13, 2003 (the
“Employment Contract”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties entered into an amendment of the Employment Contract to
comply with applicable requirements under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the final regulations and other interpretative guidance issued thereunder, which amendment was effective as of January 1, 2009; and

 WHEREAS, the parties desire to further amend the Employment Contract, effective May 1, 2010, to reflect certain new
job duties of Executive; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

 1. The amendments to the Employment Contract set forth below shall become effective on May 1, 2010. 

2. The introductory paragraph of the Employment Contract shall be deleted in its entirety and shall be replaced by the following:

 “The parties to this Employment Contract (this “Agreement”) are Koppers Inc. (the “Company”) and
Brian H. McCurrie (“Executive”). The Company desires to retain the services of executive as Senior Vice President, Global Carbon Materials and Chemicals and Executive desires to accept such employment on the terms and conditions set forth
below.” 
 3. The first sentence of Section 2 of the Employment Contract shall be deleted in its entirety and shall be
replaced by the following: 
 “During the Term, Executive shall serve as Senior Vice President, Global Carbon Materials and
Chemicals and shall perform the duties, services and responsibilities and have the authority commensurate to such position.” 
 4. Except as expressly modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Employment Contract shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly and properly
executed the day and year first above written. 
  

					
	THE COMPANY:	 		 	EXECUTIVE:
			
	/s/ Steven R. Lacy	 		 	/s/ Brian H. McCurrie
	Signature	 		 	Signature
			
	Steven R. Lacy	 		 	Brian H. McCurrie
	Name	 		 	Name
			
	 Senior Vice President, Administration,
 General Counsel & Secretary
	 		 	Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
	Title	 		 	Title
Silver Dragon Resources Inc.: Exhibit 10.6 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






EXHIBIT 10.6 

WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO: 

TONAQUINT, INC. 
303 East Wacker Drive, Suite 1200

Chicago, Illinois 60601 


Tax Serial No. 16-35-207-019 

DEED OF RECONVEYANCE 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: 

Griffiths & Turner / GT Title Services, Inc., a Utah
corporation, as Trustee under that certain Deed of Trust, dated February 15,
2011, executed by Tonaquint, Inc., a Utah corporation, as Trustor, in favor of
Silver Dragon Resources Inc., a Delaware corporation, as Beneficiary, and
recorded on February ___, 2011 as Entry No. ____________, in the
Official Records of Salt Lake County, State of Utah, pursuant to the request of
the Beneficiary thereunder, does hereby reconvey, without warranty, to the
person or persons entitled thereto, the trust property now held by it as Trustee
under said Trust Deed covering real property situated in Salt Lake County, Utah
described as follows:

COM 976.8 FT N & S 73^30' E 217.8
FT & 458.04 FT N FR CEN SEC 35 T1S R1E SL MER N 350.46 FT M OR L TO CEN OF
MILL CREEK S 78^28' E 141.66 FT S 290.69 FT S 69^14' W 88.02 FT W56.5 FT TO BEG
1 AC. 

Together with the non-exclusive right
of way over the access easements as shown on the recorded plats. 

(Tax Serial No. 16-35-207-019-0000)


DATED this ___ day of February 2011.


GRIFFITHS & TURNER / GT TITLE
SERVICES, INC. 

By:
________________________________
Name:
______________________________
Title:
_______________________________



	STATE OF ________	   ) 
	  	   : ss 
	COUNTY OF ______	   ) 


The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___
day of February 20___, by ____________, president of Griffiths & Turner / GT
Title Services, Inc. 

__________________________________________ 
Notary Public
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Able Laboratories,
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dhananjay
G. Wadekar, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert
Weinstein, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Dhananjay G. Wadekar
---------------------------------------
Name:  Dhananjay G. Wadekar
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   March 15, 2004

/s/ Robert Weinstein
---------------------------------------
Name:  Robert Weinstein
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:   March 15, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the Company), certifies that, to
his knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | This Annual Report on Form 10K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certifications are made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.

Dated: March 15, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Norbert Sporns     
|Norbert Sporns         
|Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Luxottica Group S.p.A.(the “Company”) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Enrico Cavatorta, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to myknowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ ENRICO CAVATORTA    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Enrico Cavatorta        |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

Dated:  June 26, 2008

 

Thiswritten statement accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
exv10wdwiii






Exhibit 10.d(iii)




[For directors’ existing stock options and awards]




Masco Letterhead



Date




Name

<Address1>

<Address2>

<Address3>



Dear <Salutation>:




     On behalf of the Company, I am pleased to inform you that the Board of Directors approved the
following enhancements to outstanding awards of stock options and restricted stock to non-employee
directors under the 1997 Non-Employee Directors Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “1997 Plan”)
and under the 1991 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “1991 Plan”).



     If your service as a director terminates for any reason other than as a result of death,
disability or retirement due to age, any portion of an option that is then exercisable will remain
exercisable beyond the period currently provided until the later of (i) the 15th day of
the third month following the date at which the option would otherwise have terminated in
connection with the termination of service, or (ii) December 31 of the calendar year in which the
option would otherwise have terminated in connection with the termination of service.



     If your service as a director terminates as a result of permanent and total disability, any
portion of an option not then exercisable will immediately become exercisable and will remain
exercisable until the earlier of the expiration of its original term or one year after death.



     The “clawback” provisions of the 1997 Plan (formerly Section 6(b)(5)) and comparable
provisions in any stock option granted to you under the 1991 Plan will no longer apply.



     For purposes of a “Change in Control” under the 1991 Plan and the 1997 Plan, the definition
of “Excluded Director” (i.e., a director who is deemed not to be an incumbent director) will also
include directors whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of certain actual or
threatened election contests not by or on behalf of the Board.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Very truly yours,

 	 
	 	  	 	 
	 	 	Richard A. Manoogian	 
	 	 	Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JULIO RIVERA,

Appellant,

v.

NEW HOPE POWER COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3704

[November 21, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Cymonie S. Rowe, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-

2015CA005566XXXXMB AO.

Paul B. Feltman of Alvarez, Feltman, & DaSilva, P.L., Coral Gables, for 

appellant.

Marjorie Gadarian Graham of Marjorie Gadarian Graham, P.A., Palm 

Beach Gardens, and C. Brooks Ricca, Jr. of C. Brooks Ricca, Jr. and 

Associates, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Yero v. Miami-Dade Cty., 838 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2003).

MAY AND FORST, JJ., and HILAL, JENNIFER, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,260,110
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,523,069
<INVENTORY>                                  1,624,877
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,096,428
<PP&E>                                       2,205,223
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,059,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,715,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,693,771
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       130,196
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,661,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,715,800
<SALES>                                     10,603,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        4,467,049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,371,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               404,417
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,523,069
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             403,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,171,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,054
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,172,542)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,172,542)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
        

</TABLE>