alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1





ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF


THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Neil Cole, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010 of Iconix Brand Group, Inc.;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 29, 2011





/s/ Neil ColeNeil ColePresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the quarterly  report of LaSalle  Brands  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended March 31, 2007,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Frank  Holdraker,  certify to the best of my  knowledge,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Frank Holdraker
---------------------------
Frank Holdraker, Chairman
August 28, 2007
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report
of Winton Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jill M. Burke, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                  /s/ Jill M. Burke
                                  ---------------------------------------
                                  Jill M. Burke
                                  Chief Financial Officer

October 5, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2017-4)]

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board.

# ACTION:

Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

# SUMMARY:

The Board approves the fourth quarter 2017 Rail Cost Adjustment Factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of American Railroads. The fourth quarter 2017 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 0.889. The fourth quarter 2017 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.367. The fourth quarter 2017 RCAF-5 is 0.350.

# DATES:

*Applicability Date:*                         October 1, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: (800) 877-8339.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Additional information is contained in the Board's decision, which is available on our Web site,                     *http://www.stb.gov.*                     Copies of the decision may be purchased by contacting the Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance at (202) 245-0238. Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through FIRS at (800) 877-8339.                

This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or energy conservation.

By the Board, Board Members Begeman, Elliott, and Miller.

Decided: September 18, 2017.

Marline Simeon,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2017-20136 Filed 9-20-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

      STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                     ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Mary Lynn D. Lenz, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Slade's Ferry Bancorp. (the "Company"). This statement is being
furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
(the "Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
            U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
            covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


March 12, 2005                    /s/ Mary Lynn D. Lenz
-------------------               -----------------------------------------
(Date)                            (Signature)             Mary Lynn D. Lenz
                                          President/Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.42

                           MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

                                 April 12, 2001

We the undersigned hereby agree to modify our current employment contracts with
Protein Polymer Technologies, Inc., effective through December 31, 2002, as
follows:

Section 4(f)(iii) shall now read "prior to January 1, 2002, if the employee's
employment is terminated pursuant to subsection (e) above, the Company shall
continue to pay the employee the Base Salary then in effect at intervals in
accordance with the Company's standard payroll practice until the earlier of (A)
six months following such termination or (B) the termination date set forth in
Section 1(a)(i) of this agreement; following December 31, 2001 through December
31, 2002, if the employee's employment is terminated pursuant to subsection (e)
above, the employee shall not be entitled to any further Base Salary
compensation as defined in (A) and (B) above."

This change to Section 4(f)(iii) represents the only change to these employment
agreements provided for in this Memorandum of Understanding.

EMPLOYEES                                    FOR THE COMPANY
---------                                    ---------------

/S/ J. THOMAS PARMETER                       /S/ JANIS Y. NEVES
------------------------------------         -----------------------------------
J. Thomas Parmeter                           Janis Y. Neves, Assistant Corporate
                                             Secretary


/S/ JOSEPH CAPPELLO
------------------------------------
Joseph Cappello


/S/ FRANCO A. FERRARI
------------------------------------
Franco A. Ferrari


/S/ JOHN E. FLOWERS
------------------------------------
John E. Flowers
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****As Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Houston Exploration Company (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert T. Ray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ Robert T. Ray         Name:  Robert T. Ray    Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer      The Houston Exploration Company    August 8, 2006
45
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of China Green Agriculture, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: September 12, 2011/s/ Tao LiTao LiPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)/s/ Ken RenKen RenChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer and principle accounting officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Green Agriculture, Inc. and will be retained by China Green Agriculture, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 10.10
 THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANY
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2004 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
DIRECTOR RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
 «Director_Name»
 IT IS AGREED
 Grant Date_of_Grant « ___ »
 Vesting and Forfeitures
    Stockholder Rights




---



##### 



Stock Certificates Exhibit A
 No Transfer §
 Rule 16b-3
 Other Laws
 Governing Law
 Binding Effect
 Headings and Sections
 Resolution of Disputes
 Plan and Award Agreement
 2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANYCompany Officer«Director_Name»Director
 4




---



##### 



Exhibit A
 IRREVOCABLE STOCK POWER
 ___
 Signature«Director_Name»Date
 5
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 11

- 00255

- CR Francisco MEDINA

- RUBIO , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 81st Judicial District Court , Atascosa County, Texas Trial Court No. 10

- 05

- 0131

- CRA Honorable Donna S. Rayes , Judge Presiding Opinion by: Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: February 15, 2012 MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED Francisco Medina

- Rubio was convicted by a jury of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and aggravated kidnapping. The trial court sentenced Medina

- Rubio to twenty years’ confinement and seventy years’ confinement, respectively, and ordered the terms to run concurrently. Medina

- Rubio timely appealed the judgments. Medina

- Rubio ’s court

- appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which he raises no arguable points of error and concludes this appeal is frivolous and without04

- 11

- 00255

- CR

- 2

- merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v.
State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 969). Counsel states Medina

- Rubio was provided a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and was further informed of his right to review the record 1 and file his own brief. Medina

- Rubio has not filed a pro se brief. After reviewing the record and counsel ’s brief, we find no reversible error and agree with counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

- 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Medina

- Rubio ’s counsel and affirm the trial court’s judgment s . See id .; Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.

– San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

– San Antonio 1996, no pet.). No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Medina

- Rubio wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days after either this opinion is rendered or the last timely motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration is overruled by this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. R. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 68.4. Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Do not publish

1 Counsel is reminded that he should explain the procedure for obtaining the record from the trial court clerk. See Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                           GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GTECH Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending February 22, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jaymin B. Patel, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
sections 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
   material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
   the Company.

                                   GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

Date: April 25, 2003               By /s/ Jaymin B. Patel
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                   Jaymin B. Patel, Senior Vice President and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23




Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm




Iconix Brand Group,
Inc.


New York, New York





We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-3 (Nos. 333-128425,
333-129075, 333-137383, 333-139575, 333-146288,333-152975,333-159640, and 333-158861) and on Form S-8 (Nos.333-27655, 
333-49178, 333-68906,  333-75658, 333-127416 and 333-138134) of Iconix
Brand Group, Inc. of our reports dated February 26, 2010, relating to
the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule and the
effectiveness of Iconix Brand Group, Inc.'s internal control over financial
reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K.




/s/
      BDO Seidman LLPNew York, New YorkFebruary 26, 2010
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State 

v. Stiltner, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3589.]

NOTICE

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an 

advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to 

promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 

South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other 

formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before 

the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-3589

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. STILTNER, APPELLANT.

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 

may be cited as State v. Stiltner, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3589.]

Court of appeals’ judgment vacated and cause remanded for a new trial consistent 

with State v. Brooks.

(No. 2021-0573―Submitted October 4, 2022―Decided October 12, 2022.)

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Scioto County,

No. 19CA3882, 2021-Ohio-959.

_________________

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is 

remanded to the trial court for a new trial consistent with this court’s opinion in 

State v. Brooks, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-2478, __ N.E.3d __.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART,

and BRUNNER, JJ., concur.

_________________
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

Shane A. Tieman, Scioto County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jay S. Willis, 

Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Richard M. Nash Jr., for appellant, Nathan Stiltner.

_________________
#### Ellen Bluth, Respondent, v Harvey Bluth, Appellant.

Submitted January 14, 2008;

decided February 19, 2008

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
[ 886 NE2d 179, 856 NYS2d 557]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Windham, Appellant.

Argued February 14, 2008;

decided March 25, 2008

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Legal Aid Society,*New York City *{Karen M. Kalikow*and *Steven Banks*of counsel), for appellant.

*Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney,*Brooklyn *{Anthea H. Bruffee*and *Leonard Johlove*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

*802The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

On August 2, 1991, defendant Joseph Windham was sentenced in accordance with a plea agreement to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 4 to 12 years for first-degree robbery and 1 to 3 years for first-degree sexual abuse. He was first released on parole on June 25, 1996, but was subsequently reincarcerated in 1997 for a parole violation.

In 2005, defendant appeared before Supreme Court for a sex offender risk level reassessment hearing pursuant to *Doe v Pataki*(3 F Supp 2d 456 [SD NY 1998]), at which the People successfully sought to have him adjudicated a level three (high risk) sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) (Correction Law art 6-C). In his appeal to the Appellate Division, defendant argued for the first time that he was not subject to SORA because, although he was released on parole after SORA’s effective date (Jan. 21, 1996), he finished serving the sex-offense portion of his concurrent sentence no later than August 2, 1994. In affirming the hearing court, the Appellate Division rejected this claim on the ground that it was unpreserved and, in any event, without merit.

We now affirm on the basis that defendant did not preserve his claim for appellate review; we express no view as to the merits. Although defendant looks for support to cases where we have held that a challenge to an unauthorized or illegal sentence falls within a narrow exception to the preservation rule *(see People v Samms,*95 NY2d 52 [2000]), a SORA risk-level determination is not part of a defendant’s sentence *(see People v Stevens,*91 NY2d 270, 277 [1998]). Rather, it is a collateral consequence of a conviction for a sex offense designed not to punish, but rather to protect the public *(see Doe v Pataki,*120 F3d 1263 [2d Cir 1997], *cert denied*522 US 1122 [1998]). In sum, defendant was required to contest his SORA eligibility at the hearing court.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             992
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,175<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       421
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          46,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,413
<SALES>                                         32,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,739
<CGS>                                           24,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,270<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,994
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,441
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,553
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,553
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are comprised of Due from Tax Credit Partnerships and Construction
contracts receivable.
<F2>Other Expenses are comprised of general and administrative, and depreciation
and amortization expenses.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>