alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## 2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

10-16-2007 

# B l a y lo ck v . P hi l a delphi a
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al
D ocke t N o . 06-2785

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" B l a y lock v . P hi l a de lp hi a" (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 307. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/307

## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 06-2785

ANDRE BLAYLOCK

v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; REYNOLDS, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER, BADGE # 4268; WALKER, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER, BADGE # 3730; CUJDIK, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER, BADGE # 1574; LICIARDELLO, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER, BADGE # 4383; MALKOWSKI, PHILADELPHIA POLICE SERGEANT,

BADGE # 8832; PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER DOES 1-5; BADGE NUMBERS UNKNOWN, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR CAPACITY AS POLICE OFFICERS Brian Reynolds, Thomas Liciardello, Jeffrey Walker, Louis Cujdik and Chester Malkowski, Appellants

On Appeal From the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil Action No. 05-cv-01649) District Judge: Hon. Norma L. Shapiro
Argued June 14, 2007 BEFORE: McKEE, STAPLETON and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

## 2 

## ORDER AMENDING OPINION IT IS ORDERED that the listing of attorneys for appellees in the caption of this precedential opinion be amended as follows: Michael Pileggi (Argued) 437 Chestnut Street, Suite 905 The Lafayette Building Philadelphia, PA 19106 Attorney for Appellee Andre Blaylock and Jane L. Istvan City of Philadelphia Law Department 1515 Arch Street One Parkway Philadelphia, PA 19102 Attorneys for Appellee City of Philadelphia
By the Court
/s/ Walter K. Stapleton United States Circuit Judge DATED: October 16, 2007
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2013, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC, as Operating Advisor and US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Certificate Administrator and Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through GSMS Certificates, Series 2013-GC13 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

                                                                                                                          

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President                         

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2653 

To provide that Members of Congress shall be paid last whenever the Treasury is unable to liquidate the obligations of the United States Government in a timely manner because the public debt limit has been reached. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2011 

Mr. COOPER (for himself, Mr. KIND, Mr. WELCH, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. COSTA, 

Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. DONNELLY of Indiana, Mr. ALTMIRE, 

Mr. MATHESON, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. SCHRADER, Mr. BOREN, Mr. 

BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. SHULER, Mr. KISSELL, Mr. CARNEY, and Mr. 

HIMES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide that Members of Congress shall be paid last 

whenever the Treasury is unable to liquidate the obligations of the United States Government in a timely manner because the public debt limit has been reached. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Pay for Members 

5 Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2653 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO BE PAID LAST. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the event that the public debt 

3 of the United States Government reaches the public debt 

4 limit, the obligation to pay basic pay of Members of Con5 gress may not be liquidated until— 

6 (1) all other obligations of the United States 

7 Government which are then due have been liq8 uidated; or 

9 (2) if earlier, the ability of the Treasury to liq10 uidate the obligations of the United States Govern11 ment in timely manner is restored, whether by an in12 crease in the public debt limit or otherwise. 

13 (b) CONSENT.—Each Member of Congress consents 

14 and agrees that payment of basic pay in accordance with 

15 subsection (a) shall constitute a full and complete dis16 charge and acquittance of all claims and demands for serv17 ice as such a Member during the period covered by the 

18 payment. 

19 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

20 For purposes of this Act— 

21 (1) the term ‘‘public debt limit’’ means the dol22 lar limitation contained in section 3101(b) of title 

23 31, United States Code; and 

24 (2) the term ‘‘Member of Congress’’ means— 

25 (A) each Senator, Member of the House of 

26 Representatives, and Delegate to the House of 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2653 IH

1 Representatives, and the Resident Commis2 sioner from Puerto Rico; 

3 (B) the President pro tempore of the Sen4 ate, the majority leader and the minority leader 

5 of the Senate, and the majority leader and the 

6 minority leader of the House of Representa7 tives; and 

8 (C) the Speaker of the House of Rep9 resentatives. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00373-CR

James R. Hernandez

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County (1413791D)

August 9, 2018

Opinion by Justice Pittman

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Mark T. Pittman________________

 Justice Mark T. Pittman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,533,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,239,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (583,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    521,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,399,000
<PP&E>                                      30,866,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (17,342,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,879,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,503,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    20,608,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,879,000
<SALES>                                     25,893,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,893,000
<CGS>                                       15,693,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,693,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,496,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             241,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,479,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,836,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,643,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,643,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Luxottica Group S.p.A.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roberto
Chemello, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                   By: /s/ Roberto Chemello
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       Roberto Chemello
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

Dated: June 27, 2003


This written statement accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website
(r eleased February 14, 2023 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :

A

- 22

- 365 State v. Merrifield

A

- 22

- 487 In re Interest of Shyann D.

A

- 22

- 571 In re Interest of Psaw P. et al.

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov: http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

. Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here: http s ://www.nebraska.gov/ courts/s c cales/

.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 271 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 271

   To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a program to 
provide covered institutions loans for conversion to use of biomass for 
                           energy generation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2011

 Mr. Fortenberry introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                      the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a program to 
provide covered institutions loans for conversion to use of biomass for 
                           energy generation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOAN PROGRAM FOR CONVERSION TO BIOMASS ENERGY GENERATION.

    (a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall establish a 
program to provide zero-interest loans to covered institutions for 
capital costs for converting to the use of biomass for energy 
generation.
    (b) Use of Loan Funds.--The Secretary shall ensure that a covered 
institution receiving a loan under the program established under 
subsection (a) will use woody biomass for not less than 75 percent of 
the energy generation resulting from the conversion to the use of 
biomass for such generation.
    (c) Revolving Fund.--
            (1) Establishment.--There is established in the Treasury a 
        revolving fund for the program established under subsection 
        (a).
            (2) Use of amounts in fund.--The Secretary shall use the 
        amounts in the revolving fund established under paragraph (1) 
        to carry out the program established under subsection (a).
            (3) Deposits.--The Secretary shall deposit amounts received 
        as payment on loans provided under the program established 
        under subsection (a) into the revolving fund established under 
        paragraph (1).
            (4) Initial deposit.--Of the funds of the Commodity Credit 
        Corporation, the Secretary shall make available $100,000,000 to 
        the revolving fund established under paragraph (1).
    (d) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) Covered institution.--The term ``covered institution'' 
        means--
                    (A) an institution of higher education (as defined 
                in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
                U.S.C. 1001));
                    (B) a public or private elementary or secondary 
                school; or
                    (C) a hospital.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Agriculture.
                                 <all>
```
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 40185, 40186 & 40187

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

TYLER JERMANE OWENS ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 528

Filed: June 7, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN U NPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin Falls County. Hon. Randy J. Stoker , District Judge.

Appeals from o rders denying I.C.R. 35 motions for reduction of sentences, dismissed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Sally J. Cooley, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM
In Docket No. 40185, Tyler Jermane Owens pled guilty to one count of forgery, I.C. §

18

- 3601, and one count of burglary , I.C. §§ 18

- 1401 and 18

- 1403. In Docket No. 40186, Owens
pled guilty to one count of burglary . In Docket No. 40187, Owens pled guilty to one count of
burglary . In exchange for his guilty pleas, additional charges were dismissed and the state
agreed not to pursue an allegation that Owens was a persistent violator . According to the terms
of the plea agreement entered into between the parties, Owens waived his right to appeal his

sentences unless the district court exceeded the agreed

- to sentencing recommendations and

waived his right to file I .C.R. 35 motions . Th e district court followed the terms of the plea
agreement and sentenced Owens to concurrent terms of six years, with minimum periods of2 confinement of two years, for for gery and burglary; a concurrent unified term of seven years,
with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for burglary; and a unified term of seven
years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for burglary. The district court

retain ed jurisdiction, but thereafter relinquished jurisdiction. Owens filed I.C.R 35 motions for
reduction of his sentences, which the district court denied. Owens appeals.
We hold that Owens’s appellate challenges to the excessiveness of his sentences has been
waived by his plea agreement. See I.C.R. 11(f)(1); State v. Rodriguez , 142 Idaho 786, 787, 133 P.3d 1251, 1252 (Ct. App. 2006). Owens’s plea agreement contained a clause by which Owens
waived his right to appeal his sentences and his right to file Rule 35 motions . Accordingly, we
dismiss Owens’s appeals.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000539

30-APR-2019

07:57 AM
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                              As adoptedpursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-oxley act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cell Tech International Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marta C. Carpenter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                        /s/ Marta C. Carpenter
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Marta C. Carpenter
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Accounting Officer

                                        DATED: May 15, 2004


                                       21
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of
chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SRI on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2008 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of SRI.



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 4, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gerald Woodard     
|                       |  |     |  | Gerald Woodard         
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-2005

___________________________

Phillip J. Oakes

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Kaye Howell, Warden, Randall Williams Correctional Facility, Arkansas

Department of Correction; Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of

Correction; Wendy Kelley, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction;

George Wilson,Director,Corizon Inc.; Judith Savoy, Director of Nurses, Corizon Inc.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff

____________

 Submitted: November 22, 2013

 Filed: December 16, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Phillip Oakes appeals the district court’s adverse grant of 1

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for damages, asserting a claim of

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. After careful de novo review,

see Sutherland v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr., 580 F.3d 748, 750 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of

review), we find no basis for reversal, and accordingly we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States DistrictJudge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Joe

J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 20-F of Luxottica Group S.p.A. (the “Company”) forthe fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Enrico Cavatorta,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 
|   |   | By:    | /s/ Enrico Cavatorta    |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |   | Enrico Cavatorta        |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

Dated:  June 29, 2005

 

This written statementaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----