alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief FinancialOfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (the “Company”)for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Kent W. Stanger,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: March 4,  2009 | /s/ Kent W. Stanger                                   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Kent W. Stanger                                       |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer(principal  financial officer) |

 

 

This certificationaccompanies the foregoing Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of thiscertification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-12-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          27,244
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,012
<INVENTORY>                                     45,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,334
<PP&E>                                         531,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,512,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,590
<BONDS>                                        989,759
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       389,117
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,787)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,512,303
<SALES>                                        205,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,183
<CGS>                                           68,511
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  186,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,053)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,779)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,281)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,498)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2422 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2422

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 45 Bay Street, Suite 2, in Staten Island, New York, as the 
                 ``Sergeant Angel Mendez Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 6, 2011

Mr. Grimm (for himself, Mr. Bishop of New York, Mr. Israel, Mr. King of 
   New York, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Meeks, Mr. 
Crowley, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Towns, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Velazquez, 
   Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Engel, Mrs. Lowey, Ms. 
Hayworth, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Owens, Mr. Hanna, Ms. 
    Buerkle, Ms. Hochul, Mr. Higgins, Ms. Slaughter, and Mr. Reed) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 45 Bay Street, Suite 2, in Staten Island, New York, as the 
                 ``Sergeant Angel Mendez Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT ANGEL MENDEZ POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 45 Bay Street, Suite 2, in Staten Island, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sergeant Angel Mendez Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Angel Mendez Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1   Certification of Chief Executive & Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Sweegen, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Steven Chen, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  /s/ Steven ChenSteven Chen
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

October 12, 2017
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 12

- 00525

- CR John Francisco SORIANO , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012

- CR

- 1857 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 7, 2012
DISMISSED On August 30, 2012, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record within thirty days

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 175

- 76 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order). Appellant did not file an amended certification. The clerk’s record does not contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court04

- 12

- 00525

- CR

- 2

- certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment

assesse d did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we di smiss the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10 KSB FILED WITH THE SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         871,434
<SECURITIES>                                 1,108,014
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,105,719
<PP&E>                                         389,779
<DEPRECIATION>                               (111,138)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,565,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,255
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,183
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,381,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,565,580
<SALES>                                          5,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 465 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (635,067)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (635,067)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (635,067)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          19,185
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     33,321
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,329
<PP&E>                                          13,019
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,110
<BONDS>                                        275,067
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                    (52,258)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   251,036
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,339
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,455)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,081
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,536)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,536)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.24)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-83492-01) and in the related Prospectus and in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-56106, No. 333-42932, No. 333-64167, No. 333-57781,
No. 33-88426, No. 333-27835, and No. 333-27831) of GTECH Holdings Corporation of
our report dated March 22, 2002, except for Note F, as to which the date is
April 2, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of GTECH Holdings Corporation included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended February 23, 2002.


                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
April 15, 2002
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

July Term 2014

NEVILLE BAKER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D11-4635

[December 3, 2014]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Matthew I. Destry, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-20305 

CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for attempted first degree murder and 

kidnapping with a firearm. We find no merit in his claim that the court 

erred in denying his motion to suppress based upon an invalid search 

warrant which relied on an anonymous source. Under the totality of the 

circumstances, the magistrate had sufficient probable cause to issue the 

warrant. See Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983). Here, in addition 

to the anonymous source, there was other verified information upon which 

the magistrate could rely. Appellant also claims that the court erred in 

preventing an expert’s use of a PowerPoint presentation, but no proffer was 

made of the presentation. In any event, the trial court prevented its use, 

because the state had never been notified of it prior to the expert testifying. 

The court did not abuse its discretion. Finally, no error occurred when 

the trial court allowed a detective to testify that a gun could fit into a bag 

held by appellant and observed on a surveillance video.
2

The trial court sentenced appellant to life in prison for attempted first 

degree murder and, consecutively, to life in prison for kidnapping. The 

state concedes that it was error to sentence appellant to life for attempted 

first degree murder because attempted first degree murder is a first degree 

felony punishable by imprisonment for thirty years. See §§ 775.082, 

777.04(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2009); see also Croft v. State, 60 So. 3d 1151, 1152 

(Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (holding that attempted first degree murder is a first 

degree felony, not a life felony, and that it is punishable by a maximum of 

thirty years’ imprisonment). We thus reverse appellant’s sentence on 

attempted first degree murder and remand for resentencing on that 

charge.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded.

WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2593 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to terminate the Presidential $1 

Coin Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2011 

Ms. SPEIER (for herself and Mr. POLIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to terminate the 

Presidential $1 Coin Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wasteful Presidential 

5 Coin Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF THE PRESIDENTIAL $1 COIN PRO7 GRAM. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5112 of title 31, United 

9 States Code, is amended by striking subsection (n). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2593 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect at the end of the 30-day 

3 period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

4 SEC. 3. RESTRICTION ON OVERPRODUCTION OF $1 COINS. 

5 Section 5112 of title 31, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 section: 

8 ‘‘(w) RESTRICTION ON OVERPRODUCTION OF $1 

9 COINS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of this sec10 tion, no $1 coin may be minted or issued under this sec11 tion during any period in which the number of $1 coins 

12 issued, but not in circulation, is more than 10 percent of 

13 the number of $1 coins in circulation.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-4 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance
with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 28, 2014
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of HQSM



|                                                       |  |                                              
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                                     |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation of Organization
|                                                       | 
|HQ Sustainable Maritime Marketing Inc.                 |  | New York                                     
|                                                       | 
|Jade Profit Investment Limited                         |  | British Virgin Islands                       
|                                                       | 
|Sealink Wealth Limited                                 |  | British Virgin Islands                       
|                                                       | 
|Phoenix Global Creation Limited                        |  | British Virgin Islands                       
|                                                       | 
|Jiahua Marine BioProducts Company Limited             |  | Peoples Republic of China                   
|                                                       | 
|Hainan Quebec Ocean Fishing Co. Ltd.                   |  | Peoples Republic of China                   
|                                                       | 
|Highest Quality Aquaculture Feed                       |  |                                              
|                                                       | 
|Products Company Limited                               |  | Peoples Republic of China                   
|                                                       | 
|HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries (Hong Kong) Limited |  | Hong Kong                                    
|                                                       | 
|HQ Sustainable Maritime Marketing (Canada) Inc         |  | Canada                                       
|                                                       | 
|Kingly Sun International Limited                       |  | British Virgin Islands                       
|                                                       | 
|Liberal Sky Holdings Limited                           |  | British Virgin Islands                       
|                                                       | 
|Unique Solutions Holdings Limited                      |  | British Virgin Islands
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Deion Marquis Sanders , Appellant

No. 06

- 20

- 00121

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 188th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 47,950

- A ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by

Justice Stevens

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We no te that the appellant, Deion Marquis Sanders , has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 4, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk