alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32.1
 
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C. § 1350
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Point.360 ( the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
        for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Haig S. Bagerdjian, Chief Executive
        Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
        knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                  15 (d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 /s/
        Haig S. Bagerdjian
 Haig
        S. Bagerdjian
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 November
        11, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15300 and #15301; PUERTO RICO Disaster Number PR-00030]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-4336-DR), dated 09/10/2017.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Irma.                    

*Incident Period:*                         09/05/2017 and continuing.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 09/12/2017.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/09/2017.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/11/2018.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the Commonwealth of Puerto  Rico, dated 09/10/2017, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Municipalities:*                     Adjuntas, Canovanas, Carolina, Guaynabo, Juncos, Loiza, Luquillo, Orocovis, Patillas, Utuado                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2017-19960 Filed 9-19-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 133087 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133087 COA: 262370 Kent CC: 04-007814-FC JAMES SCOTT BASKIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2057

HOMER ANDERSON, Petitioner, versus DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (97-1448-BLA) Submitted: February 16, 1999 Decided: March 4, 1999 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Homer Anderson, Petitioner Pro Se. Dorothy L. Page, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Timothy Ward Gresham, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Homer Anderson seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1998). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Anderson v. DOWCP , BRB No. 97-1448-BLA, (B.R.B. June 19, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
H. R. 2422 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 45 Bay 

Street, Suite 2, in Staten Island, New York, as the ‘‘Sergeant Angel Mendez 

Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT ANGEL MENDEZ POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 45 Bay Street, Suite 2, in Staten Island, New 

York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Angel 

Mendez Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant Angel Mendez Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 134949 & (46) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134949 COA: 268346 Lapeer CC: 05-036511-AV 71-A DC: 05-001566-SI METAMORA WATER SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief is GRANTED. The application for leave to a ppeal the August 2, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DE NIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal.

s1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2007

Clerk
MARKETING    AGREEMENT


                                                              EX-10.03




                          MARKETING    AGREEMENT

This Market Agreement (the "Agreement") is made by and between USChina Channel Incorporation (the "INC") and USChina  Channel LLC(the "LLC"), collectively the "Parties", on the third day of October, 2006.




Whereas the "INC" is a Nevada registered stock incorporation majority owned by Andrew Chien, with agency services specialized in financial area to serve the Chinese private companies going publicly listing on SEC filing, exhibits, informative conference, road show, lettering service and patent broker service, and the "LLC" is a Connecticut registered limited liability corporation fully owned by Andrew Chien, with management consultant specialized in financial area to serve the Chinese private companies going public by reverse merger.




Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual agreements promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:




1. The "LLC" agrees to recommend the services rendered by the "INC" to its customers.

2. The "LLC" agrees to pay the "INC" at the fair market rate in case that the "LLC" applies the services rendered by the "INC". 

3. The "INC" agrees to deliver all services in compliance with all relative laws, regulations or rules on the time scheduled on the contracts to the customers directly, or the LLC. 

4. The "LLC" agrees not to do any job, which is in the scope of the services rendered by the "INC".

5. The "LLC" agrees to help any market activity initiated by the "INC" voluntarily.

6. Termination will be effective thirty days following the date that 

   one Party delivers written notice of termination to the other 

   Party.

7. The parties agree to take their services liabilities directly without another party to involve in. 




Agreed to and accepted as of the third day of October, 2006 by:










USChina Channel Incorporation           USChina Channel LLC




/s/ Andrew Chien                          /s/ Andrew Chien   




Andrew Chien, President                   Andrew Chien, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          17,978
<SECURITIES>                                     4,412
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                       670
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,830
<PP&E>                                           2,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,343
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           165
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,242
<SALES>                                          2,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,508
<CGS>                                              467
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,216)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,216)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,216)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
#### The Henry Frank.†

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Louisiana.*

November 17, 1881.)

Towage, as Salvage Service.

Where a.steam-boat valued at from 035,000 to 040,000 in a gale of wind broke from her landing in the harbor, and without any steam or other propelling machinery, and with only a watchman on board, drifted down stream to her own peril, and that of the shipping in the harbor, when two tugs went to her assistance, and towed her, after much trouble, to a place of safety, it was a salvage service, and 0300 was deemed a just compensation, — three-eighths to the men and five-eighths to the boat.

Appeal in Admiralty.

*Joseph P. Hornor*and *F. W. Baker,*for libellants.

*B. Egan,*for claimants.^

†

 Reported by Joseph P. Ilornor, Esq., of the New Orleans bar.

Pardee, C. J.

Out of the conflicting evidence in this ease enough can he ascertained to show that on the fourteenth of April, 1879, at about 9 o’clock p. m., the steamer Henry Frank, a large steam-boat, *764■worth from $35,000 to $40,000, in a gale of wind blowing at about 34 miles per hour, broke away from her landing in this harbor, and without any steam or other propelling inachinery, with only one man on board, was blown and drifted down the stream, to her own peril and the peril of other shipping in port. The watchman on board rung his bell for assistance, and two tugs, the N. M. Jones and the Maud Wilmot, went to her relief, got lines aboard, and towed her, after much trouble, in shore to a place of safety. The night was dark and the river rough; the service requested and rendered was valuable and necessary; and there was something more than ordinary risk and peril to the boats and men rendering the service. Yet the fact that the Canal-street ferry-tug Jerry was running, shows that the service can hardly be classed as dangerous. The evidence is conflicting as to which tug-boat first arrived, and which rendered the most efficient service, but I do not think it necessary to go into the question. The ship was adrift and helpless, and the libellants rendered services in picking her up and landing her in safety, and there can be no doubt of their claim for compensation as salvors. The district judge has allowed $300, — three-eighths to the men, and five-eighths to the boat, —and I see no reason to disturb his judgment, unless it should be as to the rate of distribution between the libelling boat and the crew; but this is not asked, and the rate may be just, considering, all the circumstances.

Let a decree be entered for the libellants the same as in the district court, and for costs in both courts.

Both parties had appealed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-64167) pertaining to the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-57781) pertaining to the 1997 Stock
Option Plan and the 1998 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Election Plan, in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-88426 and No. 333-27835) pertaining to
the 1994 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-27831) pertaining to the 1996 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and
the 1992 Outside Directors' Director Stock Unit Plan, of GTECH Holdings
Corporation of our report dated March 29, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of GTECH Holdings Corporation included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended February 27, 1999.

                                                              ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
May 11, 1999
REVIEW
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      

    To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of

    Sensivida
Medical Technologies, Inc.

     

    We have
reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Sensivida
Medical Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of May 31, 2009,
and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows
for the three-month periods ended May 31, 2009 and 2008. These interim condensed
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management.

    


    We
conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making
inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective
of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements
taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

    


    Based on
our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made
to the accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.

    


    The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As
disclosed in Note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the
Company has no revenues, incurred significant losses from operations, and has
negative working capital and an accumulated deficit which raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plan in
regard to these matters is also described in Note 1. The condensed
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and
classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to
continue as a going concern.

    


    We have
previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of
Sensivida Medical Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 28, 2009,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’
deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in
our report dated June 16, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2009, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet
from which it has been derived.

    


    /s/
Morison Cogen LLP

    


    Bala
Cynwyd, Pennsylvania

    June 16,
2010
exv10w13






Exhibit 10.13




December 7, 2010




Mr. John W. Bachmann

Edward Jones

12555 Manchester Road

St. Louis, Mo. 63131




Dear John:



          This will confirm the following agreement relating to the deferral of your director’s
retainers and fees for 2011.


          1. All director’s fees and retainer (“Fees”) payable to you in connection with your service on
the boards of directors (including committees of such boards) of AMR Corporation and American
Airlines, Inc. for the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011, will be deferred and paid
to you in accordance with this letter agreement.


          2. Fees will be converted to Stock Equivalent Units in accordance with the Procedures for
Deferral of Board Retainers and Fees, as amended and restated, a copy of which is attached hereto
as Exhibit A (the “Plan”).


          3. On the 30th business day after the date when you cease to be a Director of AMR Corporation
and any affiliates, and cease rendering services, the Stock Equivalent Units accrued pursuant to
the Plan will be converted to cash and paid to you in a lump sum by multiplying the number of such
Stock Equivalent Units by the arithmetic mean of the high and the low of AMR stock (“fair market
value”) during the month when you ceased to be a Director of AMR Corporation and any affiliates,
and cease rendering services. Payment cannot be accelerated.


          4. In the event of your death, the number of Stock Equivalent Units as of your date of death
will be multiplied by the fair market value of AMR stock during the calendar month immediately
preceding your death, and the amount paid to Katherine Bachmann. The payment contemplated by this
paragraph 4 will be made on the 30th business day following the date of your death.



 









 







          If the foregoing is satisfactory to you, please indicate by signing one of the originals (two
are enclosed) and returning it to me.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,

 	 
	 	/s/ Kenneth W. Wimberly
 	 
	 	Kenneth W. Wimberly 	 
	 	Corporate Secretary 	 
	 



	 	 	 

	Accepted
and agreed:

	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ John W. Bachmann
 

John W. Bachmann

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	12/10/10
 

Date
Exhibit 15.1
Deloitte & Touche LLP333 Clay Street,Suite 2300Houston, Texas 77002
August 10, 2004
Sterling Chemicals, Inc.333 Clay Street, Suite 3600Houston, Texas 77002
We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interimfinancial information of Sterling Chemicals, Inc. and subsidiaries (the“Company”) for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, as indicated in ourreport dated August 10, 2004; because we did not perform an audit, weexpressed no opinion on that information.
We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in yourQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, isincorporated by reference in the Company’s Registration Statement No.333-105794 on Form S-8.
We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of theRegistration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a reportprepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and11 of that Act.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
**Exhibit 11**

**STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS**

Basic and diluted earnings per common shareof $0.11 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 were calculated by dividing net income of $319,000 for the period April 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006 by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding of 2,907,311. 

Basic and diluted earnings per common share of $0.24 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were calculated by dividing net income of $703,000for the period January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006 by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding of 2,914,787.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**TYRONE HARRIS,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 400 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 16th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**