alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended  quarterly  report of LaSalle Brands  Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Frank Holdraker,  certify to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Frank Holdraker
---------------------------
Frank Holdraker, Chairman
October 11, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**GREG DARIN ERLER,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 295 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 14th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
EXHIBIT 32.1

CALIPER LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Kevin Hrusovsky, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                       |  | /s/E. KEVIN HRUSOVSKYE. Kevin Hrusovsky
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2007 |  |                                                                                                            

---



QuickLinks
#### Aida L. ZIADEH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 08-1154.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 19, 2008.

Decided: June 23, 2008.

Aida L. Ziadeh, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United *228States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Aida L. Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to compel compliance with a consent order and denying her motion for a partial stay of the consent order pending resolution of the motion to compel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Ziadeh v. United States,*No. 3:06-cv-00386-REP (E.D.Va. Jan. 17, 2008); *see Dart Drug Coup. v. Nicholakos,*221 Va. 989, 277 S.E.2d 155, 158 (1981) (burden on movant to show consent unreasonably withheld). To the extent that Ziadeh challenges earlier court orders, they are not before this court. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15.1



Deloitte & Touche LLP
333 Clay Street,
Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002

May 10, 2005

Sterling Chemicals, Inc.
333 Clay Street, Suite 3600
Houston, Texas 77002

We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial
information of Sterling Chemicals, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") for the
quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, as indicated in our report dated May 10,
2005; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, is
incorporated by reference in the Company's Registration Statement No. 333-105794
on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant
  to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section
  302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of UltraGuard Water
  Systems Corp on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Ken Fielding, President and Chief
  Executive Officer of UltraGuard Water Systems Corp, hereby certify pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarban-Oxley
  Act of 2002, to our knowledge

| | (1) | the quarterly report of UltraGuard Water Systems
        Corp for the period ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the
        requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934; and                                              
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | the information contained in such quarterly report
        of UltraGuard Water Systems Corp for the period ended June 30, 2003 fairly
        represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results
        of operations of UltraGuard Water Systems Corp.



/s/ Ken Fielding
    Ken Fielding 
    President and Chief Executive Officer


---
exv10w20









Exhibit 10.20




Schedule of Executives with

Continuity Agreements




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title	 	Name	 	Years/Comp*
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

	 	Stephen D. Newlin
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

	 	Robert M. Patterson
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President, President of Distribution

	 	Michael L. Rademacher
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President , Supply Chain and Operations

	 	Thomas J. Kedrowski
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President, Chief Information and Human Resources Officer

	 	Kenneth M. Smith
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial
Officer

	 	Michael E. Kahler
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President, President of
Performance Products and Solutions

	 	Robert M. Rosenau
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President, President of Europe and South America

	 	Bernard P. Baert
	 	 	2	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary

	 	Lisa K. Kunkle
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President, President of Asia

	 	Willie Chien
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior
Vice President, President of Global Specialty Engineered Materials

	 	Craig M. Nikrant
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior
Vice President, President of Global Specialty Color, Additives and Inks

	 	John V. Van Hulle
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President, Innovation, Sustainability and Chief Innovation Officer

	 	Cecil C. Chappelow
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President, Treasurer

	 	Daniel O’Bryon
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President, Tax

	 	Frank Vari
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President, Corporate Controller

	 	Vincent W. Shemo
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President, Planning and Investor Relations

	 	Joseph P. Kelley
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President, Marketing

	 	Julie McAlindon
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President, Key Account Management

	 	Kurt Schuering
	 	 	1	 








 




			
	*  Years of compensation payable upon change of control.
Exhibit 31.1
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Sterling Chemicals, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ RICHARD K. CRUMPRichard K. CrumpPresident and Chief Executive Officer
[954 NYS2d 722]

#### Smooth Dental, P.L.L.C., as Assignee of Oba Connor, Respondent, v Preferred Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department, 2d, 11th and 13th Judicial Districts,

October 16, 2012

*68APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Methfessel & Werbel,*New York City *(Frank J. Kennan*of counsel), for appellant. *Law Offices of Damin J. Toell, P.C.,*Brooklyn *(Damin J. Toell*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

In this action to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits for dental services provided to plaintiffs assignor as a result of injuries sustained in an automobile accident, the record indicates that, subsequent to the assignment of benefits from plaintiffs assignor to plaintiff and the provision of dental services by plaintiff to its assignor, defendant Preferred Mutual Insurance Company commenced a declaratory judgment action in Supreme Court, New York County, against plaintiffs assignor based upon his alleged misrepresentation of his residence when applying for insurance. By order dated October 25, 2004, the Supreme Court granted Preferred’s motion for summary judgment in the declaratory judgment action, and declared that Preferred was “not obligated to provide no-fault benefits or defend any claims for bodily injury or property damage on [its] policy issued to [Oba Connor, plaintiff’s assignor].” Several years later, plaintiff commenced the instant no-fault action, and Preferred moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, contending that this action was barred by virtue of the Supreme Court’s order. The Civil Court denied defendant’s motion.

Plaintiff herein was neither named nor served in the declaratory judgment action nor, at the time, was it in privity with its assignor, who was a named party in that action, as the assignment of benefits had been executed before the declaratory judgment action had been commenced, and plaintiff otherwise had no full and fair opportunity to appear and defend its interests in that proceeding. Consequently, the instant action is not subject to dismissal by virtue of the order in the declaratory judgment action *(see Gramatan Home Invs. Corp. v Lopez,*46 NY2d 481 [1979]; *Magic Recovery Med. & Surgical Supply Inc. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,*27 Misc 3d 67 [App Term, 2d Dept, *692d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2010]). As a result, Preferred’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied.

Accordingly, the order of the Civil Court is affirmed.

Weston, J.P, Rios and Solomon, JJ., concur.
<PAGE> 1

Exhibit 23.2


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration  statement
of DBS Industries, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-70117) of our report dated May
24, 2002on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as
of December 31, 2001 and 2000, for the years ended  December 31, 2001,  2000 and
1999 and for the period from April 25, 1990 (date of  inception) to December 31,
2001, which report is included in this 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Francisco, California
May 31, 2002
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      --------------------------------------------------------------------


In connection with the Annual Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc;
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Norbert Sporns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 31, 2006

                                          /s/Norbert Sporns
                                          -----------------
                                         Norbert Sporns, Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc.
(the Company), certifies that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1, 2006 (the Report) of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of January 1, 2006 and
for the period then ended.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 14, 2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Frederick R. Hipp                
|Frederick R. Hipp                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 [TRC LETTERHEAD] 
 February 18, 2011 

Robert D. Woltil 
 Dear Bob: 

We are pleased that you have accepted the position of interim Chief Executive Officer of Technology Research Corporation, a Florida
corporation (the “Company”), effective immediately. This letter sets forth certain terms of your employment with the Company that apply while you are serving as the interim CEO (the “CEO Service Period”):

  

	 	1.	You will continue to serve as Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and will be required to continue to perform the duties and
responsibilities of those positions. 

  

	 	2.	In addition to your current base salary, during the CEO Service Period you will be paid a bonus of $5,000 per calendar month (less applicable withholdings) as full
compensation for your performance of the additional duties and responsibilities as interim CEO, which amount shall be pro-rated for any partial months. 

  

	 	3.	The Company may remove and replace you as CEO at any time. 

  

	 	4.	As interim CEO, you agree not to make any changes to the Company’s organizational structure, or its personnel or compensation structure (except for compensation
changes or the hiring or termination of employees that are below the Director level), without the prior approval of the Company’s Board of Directors. Ray Malpocher, the Company’s Lead Director, is your point of contact with the Board of
Directors. 

 Nothing in this letter modifies the “at-will” nature of your employment with the Company,
and the terms of this letter, therefore, do not and are not intended to create either an express or implied contract of employment with the Company for any particular period of time. 

If you are in agreement with the terms of this letter, please sign and return one original executed copy of this letter to the Company
and retain one for your records. 
  

			
	Sincerely,
	
	Technology Research Corporation
		
	By:	 	         s/ Ray Malpocher

		 	        Ray Malpocher, Lead Director


 Acknowledged and Agreed to: 
  

	
	 s/ Robert D. Woltil

	Robert D. Woltil
#### Lamont M. CUSACK, Petitioner—Appellant, v. LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, WARDEN, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 08-6343.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 13, 2008.

Decided: June 19, 2008.

Lamont M. Cusack, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lamont M. Cusack seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dis-positive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cusack has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________ ___

NO. 09

- 17

- 00028

- CV

________________ ___

IN THE ESTATE OF RUFUS JENNINGS HOLT

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Orange County, Texas

Trial Cause No. P16967A

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Appellan t has filed a motion to abate this appeal, representing that the parties

have reached a settlement agreement and that, as soon as the parties can file the

appropriate motions in the trial court, appellant will file a motion to dismiss the

appeal. According ly, we grant the motion, abate the appeal, and permit proceedings

in the trial court to effectuate the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.1(a)(2)(C).

The appeal sha ll be abated until the appellant files a motion to reinstate and

dismiss the appeal , which shall be accomplished by no later than May 14 , 2018. If a2

motion is not fi led by that date, the appeal will be reinstated and submitted to the

Court without oral argument.

ORDER ENTERED March 14 , 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. 4. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-31185 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FERNANDO FRAGUELA, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-339-2-C May 8, 2000 Before GARWOOD, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Fernando Fraguela appeals from his jury-verdict conviction for conspiracy to import cocaine and importation of cocaine. He argues that: (1) three of the Government witnesses were paid in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2); (2) the district court erred by denying his motion for acquittal based on his affirmative defense of entrapment; (3) the Government’s conduct in arranging his arrest deprived the district court of jurisdiction to convict him and violated his rights under the Vienna Convention on2

Consular Relations; (4) the jury’s guilty verdict was not supported by substantial evidence; and (5) the prosecutor challenged potential jurors solely on account of their race. Fraguela’s argument regarding his rights under the Vienna convention, raised for the first time on appeal, is briefed inadequately. As such, it is deemed abandoned. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993) (arguments must be briefed adequately in order to be preserved for appeal); see also Fed. R. App. P. 28 (a)(9)(A) (appellant’s argument must include citations to the authority and the parts of the record on which the appellant relies). Our review of his remaining arguments fails to disclose any reversible error. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.