alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Asia Leechdom Holding Corp.: Exhibit 10.6 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.6

Jinnan Hengfeng Weiye Medicine Co., Ltd 

Product Purchase and Sale Contract 

	Supplier: 	Contract No.: 
	Acquirer: Tianjin Boai Leechdom Technique Co., Ltd.
    	Signing Place: 
	  	Signing Date: Jul 1, 2010
  


The Parties reach the following agreement through friendly
consultations: 1. Category, Specification, Quantity and Price 

	Product 	Product 	Unit 	Unit Price 	Quantity 	Amount 	Note 
	Name 	Standard 	  	  	  	  	  
	All
      Products 	  	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  	  	  
	
    Total amount in RMB (Capitalized): Eighteen Million 

	
    Payment and Term Cheque 

	
    Delivery and Term 



	
     
	
       

	
    1. 
	
      Check and Acceptance: The quality of products should be
      in line with the Chinese Pharmacopoeia and the Standards of
      Local Pharmaceuticals Industry. After the receipt of the products by
      the Acquirer, they could raise an objection to the Supplier in writing
      within 7 days started from the receipt, otherwise the products would be
      deemed to be in accordance with the standards. Products could not be
      returned with other non-quality reasons. All losses caused by returns
      without authorization from the Supplier, should be borne by the
      Acquirer.

	
     
	
     

	
    2. 
	
      Claim: The Supplier could ask the carrier for a
      certification of liability accident directly if there is any damage or
      loss caused by the carrier of the products which are in the charge of the
      Supplier, and turn over the certification of liability accident to the
      Seller within 7 days from arrival of the products, otherwise it would be
      deemed that the Acquirer has received with correct quantities.

	
     
	
     

	
    3. 
	
      Default Responsibility: The defaulting party should be
      liable for breach of contract according to the Contract Law.

	
     
	
     

	
    4. 
	
      Other Terms Appointed;

	
     
	
     

	
    5. 
	
      Solutions of Contractual Controversy: If any controversy
      occurs and could not be resolved through consultation, the Parties could
      apply to an arbitral authority in the Supplier’s area for
  litigation

	
     
	
     

	
    6. 
	
      The Parties have already read in details and accepted all
      of the Contract, which would be legally of equal effect after being signed
      and sealed by the Parties.




	the Supplier (Seal):
    Jinnan Hengfeng
      Weiye Medicine Co., Ltd 

    Special Contract Seal of Jinnan Hengfeng 
	the Acquirer (Seal):
      

 Special Contract Seal of Tianjin Boai 













	
Weiye Medicine Co., Ltd
	
	
Leechdom Technique Co., Ltd.
	

	
Address: Jinan, Shandong Province
	
	
Address:
	

	
Client Representative:
	
	
Client Representative:
	

	
Opening Bank: China Construction
Bank,
Huaiyin Sub-Branch
	
	
Opening Bank:
	

	
Account Number:
	
	
Account Number:
	

	
Tax Number:
	
	
Tax Number:
	

	
Telphone:
	
	
Telphone:
	

	
Fax:
	
	
Fax:
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Enrico Cavatorta, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Luxottica Group S.p.A.;

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       Thecompany’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annualreport that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                                       Thecompany’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
|   |   | By:    | /s/ ENRICO CAVATORTA    |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |   | Enrico Cavatorta        |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

Dated: June 29,2005

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION of CFO PURSUANT TO

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period from June 7, 2013
(Inception) to December 31, 2013 (the Report) of FS Investment Corporation III (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edward T. Gallivan, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer
of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2014       
|                            
|/s/  EDWARD T. GALLIVAN, JR.
|Edward T. Gallivan, Jr.     
|Chief Financial Officer
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-06-00321- CR Ro be r t L e e He r r ing , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF BELL CO UNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 58842 , HO NORAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESI DING

M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Robert L ee H erring se eks to appea l a judgment of conviction for ca pital murder. The trial court ha s cer

tified that this is a plea barg ain case , Her ring waived the right of appe al as pa rt of the plea barg ain agree ment, and Her ring has no right of appe al. SeeTe x. R. A pp . P. 25 .2 (a)( 2) ; see als o Blan c o v . S

tate , 18 S.W .3d 218, 220 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The appe al is di s m i ssed. See Tex. R. App. P . 25.2(d).

__________________________________________ G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P uryear and Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: June 30, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh
#### Richard VALDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Julie MARSHALL, Judge, District Court Fremont County; Colorado Department of Corrections; Bill Ritter, Governor; Allen Stanley, Colorado Department Division of State Board of Parole and Complete Staff; Division of Adult Parole and Community Corrections; Jeaneen Miller; State Office of the District Attorney, Fremont County; Molly Chilson, D.A.; Kathy Eberling, D.A.; United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Alberto Gonzales, U.S. Attorney; Nora Kurtz, Sgt. Mailroom Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility and Complete Staff; Adult Probation of Fremont County; Mark Nethercot; Colorado State Office of the Public Defender; Mr. Wilson; Frances Brown; Sam McClure; Worley, Canyon City Police Dept. Detective; Lou Archuleta, Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility Warden; Nina Davis, Canyon City Police Dept. Cooperating Source; United States Sentencing Commission; Kenneth P. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-1313.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 11, 2008.

Richard Valdez, Crowley, CO, pro se.

Before KELLY, MURPHY, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.*

*

 After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined *80unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

*80ORDER AND JUDGMENT**

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Richard Valdez, an inmate appearing pro se, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice. Mr. Valdez sought declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief against a variety of state, local and federal officials challenging his conviction, sentence, and conditions of confinement. Though Mr. Valdez argues on appeal that the district court never addressed the merits of his claims, we affirm for substantially the same reasons given by the district court.1 The invalidity or improper execution of a sentence is addressed through a habeas petition. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, 2254; *see Preiser v. Rodriguez,*411 U.S. 475, 487, 500, 93 S.Ct. 1827, 36 L.Ed.2d 439 (1973). Additionally, the claims for relief under § 1983 lack sufficient focus and detail to transform them into claims for relief.

AFFIRMED. All pending requests ..and motions are denied including the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Mr. Valdez must immediately pay the unpaid balance due on the appellate filing fee.

**

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

1

. Mr. Valdez also requested that the court hear his case en banc. His request does not comply with Fed. R.App. P. 35(b)(1) which requires that a petition address the extraordinary grounds which might justify an initial hearing en banc. *See also*10 th Cir. R. 35.1(A). Accordingly, the request is denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1302

THOMAS GLASS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTIC CORP.; BETH TEAGUE, Inclusive,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. 

(1:15-cv-03501-JKB)

Submitted: August 23, 2016 Decided: September 1, 2016

Before KING, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Glass, Appellant Pro Se. David William Erb, FISHER & 

PHILLIPS, LLP, Westminster, Maryland; Jason Alex Storipan, 

FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP, Murray Hill, New Jersey, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Glass appeals the district court’s order granting 

the motion to dismiss his civil action. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. See Glass v. Ryder 

Integrated Logistic Corp., No. 1:15-cv-03501-JKB (D. Md. Mar. 

14, 2016). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Asia Leechdom Holding Corporation: Exhibit 10.28 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.28

Equity Transfer Agreement 

Acquiree: Haiwei He 

Acquirer: Tianjin BoaiPharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 

	 	1. 	
      The Acquiree agrees to transfer her equity of Tianjin
      BoaiLeechdom Technique Co., Ltd., which is 5%, to the Acquirer.

	 	 	 
	 	2. 	
      The Acquirer agrees to accept the 5% equity of Tianjin
      BoaiLeechdom Technique Co., Ltd. From the acquiree.

	 	 	 
	 	3. 	
      Before and after equity transfer, the Acquirer shall
      incur the obligations of Tianjin BoaiLeechdom Technique Co., Ltd.
      according to the proportion of shares.



Acquiree: Haiwei He 

Acquirer: Tianjin BoaiPharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 

Date: August 10 2007.




Equity Transfer Agreement 

Acquiree: Yansheng Wang 

Acquirer: Tianjin Boai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 

	 	1. 	
      The Acquiree agrees to transfer her equity of Tianjin
      Boai Leechdom Technique Co., Ltd., which is 14%, to the
Acquirer.

	 	 	 
	 	2. 	
      The Acquirer agrees to accept the 14% equity of Tianjin
      Boai Leechdom Technique Co., Ltd. From the acquiree.

	 	 	 
	 	3. 	
      Before and after equity transfer, the Acquirer shall
      incur the obligations of Tianjin Boai Leechdom Technique Co., Ltd.
      according to the proportion of shares.



Acquiree: Yansheng Wang 

Acquirer: Tianjin Boai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 

Date: August 10 2007.




Equity Transfer Agreement 

Acquiree: Chao Ma 

Acquirer: Tianjin Boai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 

	 	1. 	
      The Acquiree agrees to transfer her equity of Tianjin
      Boai LeechdomTechnique Co., Ltd., which is 1%, to the Acquirer.

	 	 	 
	 	2. 	
      The Acquirer agrees to accept the 1% equity of Tianjin
      Boai Leechdom Technique Co., Ltd. From the acquiree.

	 	 	 
	 	3. 	
      Before and after equity transfer, the Acquirer shall
      incur the obligations of Tianjin Boai Leechdom Technique Co., Ltd.
      according to the proportion of shares.



Acquiree: Chao Ma 

Acquirer: Tianjin Boai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 

Date: August 10 2007.




Equity Transfer Agreement 

Acquiree: Xuecheng Xia 

Acquirer: Tianjin Boai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 

	 	1. 	
      The Acquiree agrees to transfer her equity of Tianjin
      Boai Leechdom Technique Co., Ltd., which is 80%, to the
Acquirer.

	 	 	 
	 	2. 	
      The Acquirer agrees to accept the 80% equity of Tianjin
      Boai Leechdom Technique Co., Ltd. From the acquiree.

	 	 	 
	 	3. 	
      Before and after equity transfer, the Acquirer shall
      incur the obligations of Tianjin Boai Leechdom Technique Co., Ltd.
      according to the proportion of shares.



Acquiree: Xuecheng Xia 

Acquirer: Tianjin Boai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 

Date: August 10 2007.
Exhibit 99.1                    Certification of Chief Executive
Officer.

In connection with the periodic report of Optika Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Mark K. Ruport, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:

| | (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                          
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and
for the periods indicated.

| | 5/13/2003 |  | /s/  MARK K. RUPORT                                          | 
| | --------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ | 
| |           |  |                                                              | 
| | (Date)    |  | Mark K. Ruport                                               | 
| |           |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-QSB of South Street Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                  |  |                              |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                  |  | SOUTH STREET FINANCIAL CORP.
|                  |  |                             
|Date: May 9, 2006 |  | By:                          |  | /s/ R. Ronald Swanner                
|                  |  |                              |  | R. Ronald Swanner                    
|                  |  |                              |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  |                             
|Date: May 9, 2006 |  | By:                          |  | /s/ Christopher F. Cranford          
|                  |  |                              |  | Christopher F. Cranford              
|                  |  |                              |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-31250 Conference Calendar

__________________ DAVID M. NICHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus WAYNE MCELVEEN; SHERIFF'S DEP'T CALCASIEU PARISH, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 93-CV-1107 - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * David M. Nichols, #666133, argues that the district court erred in denying his "MOTION FOR A PLEA IN ABATEMENT FOR REVIVAL OF ACTION, VIA - TORT CLAIM AND DIVERSITY OF CITIZENSHIP ACTION (SUMMARY JUDGMENT)."No. 95-31250 -2- We have reviewed the record, the opinion of the district court, and the brief, and find, substantially for the reasons relied upon by the district court, that Nichols' appeal has no arguable merit. The appeal should be dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. APPEAL DISMISSED.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2493 

To amend the African Growth and Opportunity Act to extend the third 

country fabric program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2011 

Mr. MCDERMOTT (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, and Mr. 

JOHNSON of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the African Growth and Opportunity Act to extend 

the third country fabric program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO AFRICAN GROWTH AND OP4 PORTUNITY ACT. 

5 (a) EXTENSION OF THIRD-COUNTRY FABRIC PRO6 GRAM.—Section 112(c)(1) of the African Growth and Op7 portunity Act (19 U.S.C. 3721(c)(1)) is amended— 

8 (1) in the paragraph heading, by striking 

9 ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’; and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2493 IH

1 (2) in subparagraphs (A) and (B)(ii), by strik2 ing ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

3 (b) ADDITION OF SOUTH SUDAN.—Section 107 of 

4 that Act (19 U.S.C. 3706) is amended by inserting after 

5 ‘‘Republic of South Africa’’ the following: 

6 ‘‘Republic of South Sudan.’’. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

9 of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-25-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-26-2000
<CASH>                                         20,579
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,405
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     3,896
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               31,339
<PP&E>                                        111,437
<DEPRECIATION>                                 35,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                291,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          27,123
<BONDS>                                       100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          47,335
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            9
<OTHER-SE>                                   (18,708)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  291,073
<SALES>                                       195,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              195,583
<CGS>                                          61,288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 178,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                9,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  393
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (1,520)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,280)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,280)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (6.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (6.16)


</TABLE>