alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

BlueIce Engineering, LLC ) ASBCA No. 62679

)

Under Contract No. N40192

- 19

- P

- 7102 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Bryan B. Arnold, Esq.

Gordee, Nowicki & Blankeney LLP

Irvine, CA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Jerry Kim, Esq.

Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: October 6 , 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62679

, Appeal of BlueIce

Engineering, LLC , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 7, 2021 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2743 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2743

  To provide for the conveyance of a small parcel of National Forest 
                    System land in Pound, Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2011

   Mr. Griffith of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the conveyance of a small parcel of National Forest 
                    System land in Pound, Virginia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, MULLINS AND STURGILL CEMETERY AND ADJOINING 
              TRACT, JEFFERSON NATIONAL FOREST, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Conveyance Required.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall 
convey, without consideration, to the Mullins and Sturgill Cemetery 
Association of Pound, Virginia (in this section referred to as the 
``recipient''), all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to a parcel of National Forest System land in the Jefferson 
National Forest in Wise County, Virginia, consisting of not more than 
1.25 acres and containing the Mullins and Sturgill Cemetery and its 
access road.
    (b) Condition of Conveyance.--The conveyance under subsection (a) 
shall be subject to the condition that the recipient accept the real 
property described in such subsection in its condition at the time of 
the conveyance, commonly known as conveyance ``as is''.
    (c) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal 
description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection (a) 
shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost 
of the survey shall be borne by the recipient.
    (d) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance 
under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect 
the interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
|             |  |              
|------------ |  | -------------
|Exhibit 32.1 |  | Certification



In connection with the periodic report
of Optika Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mark K. Ruport, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|             |  |                                                             
|------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|May 12, 2004 |  | /s/  Mark K. Ruport                                         
|(Date)       |  | Mark K. Ruport                                              
|             |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      350708
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2471745
<ALLOWANCES>                                 23505
<INVENTORY>                                1098463
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           6431532
<PP&E>                                      718921
<DEPRECIATION>                              435992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             6724592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3573924
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     54748
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                 119588
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               6724592
<SALES>                                    4278886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           4278886
<CGS>                                      3463920
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              3463920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           11940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (227498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (227498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (227498)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.04)


</TABLE>
#### Josephine A. ST. CLAIR, as Executrix of the Estate of Harold W. St. Clair, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. EASTERN AIR LINES, Inc., Defendant. Josephine A. ST. CLAIR, as Executrix of the Estate of Harold W. St. Clair, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. *New*York.

Feb. 19, 1958.

Powers Kaplan & Berger, New York City, for plaintiff. David A. Ticktin, New York City, of counsel.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, for defendant Eastern Air Lines, Inc. P. G. Pennoyer, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves to vacate two notices of deposition served by defendant Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

In brief, the plaintiff claims that the proposed pretrial examinations of the Sun Ray Park Health Resort and Dr. Donald E. Fortner is “in violation of the right of preservation of a confidential communication between patient and doctor and the hospital.”

' [1] Inasmuch as the subject matter of the proposed depositions is undisclosed 1 except that defendant seeks to learn if “deceased had, in the year of his death and for some time before, been an alcoholic, had been treated for chronic alcoholism, and had been admitted to the Sun Ray Park Sanitarium,” what merit there is in these contentions should be decided at the examination where it will first appear whether the examination touches upon information within the asserted privilege, not in advance thereof.2

The court finds no merit in plaintiff’s further contention that the notices are served on the eve of trial and are therefore served only for delay. The papers on this motion show that the mat*331ters defendant Eastern Air Lines, Inc. seeks to explore on these depositions were only recently brought to its attention.

Plaintiff further claims that the notice of examination of Philip Stoller should be vacated because he has already given a deposition in these actions. This does not per se entitle plaintiff to vacatur of the notice.

It appears that defendant Eastern Air Lines, Inc. intends to question Mr. Stoller, a former employer of the decedent, regarding the latter’s alleged alcoholism, a subject previously unhinted at in the case and not the subject of Mr. Stoller’s cross-examination by defendant when plaintiff took his deposition.

Since the basis for defendant’s suspicions was only recently disclosed to it, and the importance of this inquiry being obvious, there is no reason why the defendant Eastern Air Lines, Inc. should not take the depositions sought by its notices.

Settle an order.

1

. Feldmann v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co., D.C.E.D.Mo.1944, 57 F.Supp. 70.

2

. 4 Moore’s Fed.Prac. (2d ed.) par. 30.09, p. 2031; Continental Distilling Corp. v. Humphrey, D.C.1955, 17 F.R.D. 237.
EXHIBIT 31.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Michael L. Schumacher, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Birch Branch, Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such valuation; and

          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Dated:  October 12, 2005


 /s/ Michael L. Schumacher
Michael L. Schumacher
President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer
 and Chief Financial Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131820 & (78) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 131820 

 COA: 260155 
 Wayne CC: 04-004270-01

GREGORY C. WASHINGTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion to accept a supplemental brief is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JC/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

GABRIEL VALENZUELA-SAINZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-50561

D.C. No. 3:08-cr-02813-LAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 

Gabriel Valenzuela-Sainz appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of cocaine, in violation of

21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Our jurisdiction is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

FILED

DEC 14 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JC/Research 2 08-50561

we dismiss.

Valenzuela-Sainz contends the district court erred by failing to recommend

him to the Bureau of Prisons’ (“BOP”) 500-hour residential treatment program for

substance abuse. Authority to determine whether a prisoner enters a residential

treatment program resides in the executive branch of the government and is

delegated to the BOP. See 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b), (e); see also Downey v. Crabtree,

100 F.3d 662, 666 (9th Cir. 1996) (“[The BOP] has broad discretion over the entire

drug-treatment process within the federal corrections system, beginning with

determining which inmates ever enter substance-abuse programs.”). Because

eligibility and referral to the residential substance abuse treatment program is not

within the district court’s authority, we have no jurisdiction to consider

Valenzuela-Sainz’s claim on appeal.

DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          84,532
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,214,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,930
<INVENTORY>                                 15,760,393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,927,124
<PP&E>                                      10,560,599
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,068,586
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,433,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,231,827
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,618,339
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,436,263)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,433,643
<SALES>                                     65,534,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,534,545
<CGS>                                       57,679,610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               63,524,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,173,062
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                95,694
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             584,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,843,251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,908)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,836,343
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         901,336
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,018,929
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    581,844
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,920,199
<PP&E>                                       1,080,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,807,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,059,171
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,741,333
<PREFERRED>                                  2,355,948
<COMMON>                                    40,319,124
<OTHER-SE>                                (47,727,122)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,807,868
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,092,549
<CGS>                                        2,387,574
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,578,024
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             138,438
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,030,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,030,439)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,030,439)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43771-43772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center For Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific

[[Page 43772]]

Review Special Emphasis Panel, September 12, 2017, 12:00 p.m. to 
September 12, 2017, 4:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the Federal 
Register on August 15, 2017, 82 FR 38697.
    The meeting will be held on October 24, 2017, 11:00 a.m. to 2:30 
p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to 
the public.

    Dated: September 13, 2017.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-19854 Filed 9-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 13.3  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Luxottica Group S.p.A. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stefano Grassi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:  1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:
/s/   STEFANO GRASSIStefano   GrassiChief   Financial Officer   Dated: April 24, 2015  This written statement accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

LAMAR ALLEN,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 463 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<PAGE>
 
                  SUBSIDIARIES OF WESTERN GAS RESOURCES, INC.

                                        
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                               RELATIONSHIP
------------------                               ------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>                                          <C>
1)  MIGC, Inc.                                   Wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc.
    
2)  MGTC, Inc.                                   Wholly-owned subsidiary of MIGC, Inc.
    
3)  Western Gas Resources - Texas, Inc.          Wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc.
    
4)  Williston Gas Company                        50%-owned joint venture of Western Gas Resources, Inc.
    
5)  Western Gas Resources Storage, Inc.          Wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc.
    
6)  Centre Court Travel, Inc.                    Wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc.
    
7)  Rising Star Pipeline Corporation             Wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc.
    
8)  Setting Sun Pipeline Corporation             Wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc.
    
9)  Western Gas Resources - Louisiana, Inc.      Wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc.
    
10) Western Gas Resources - Oklahoma, Inc.       Wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc.
    
11) Westana Gathering Company                    A general partnership with Western Gas Resources, Inc.
                                                 as general partner
    
12) Mountain Gas Resources, Inc.                 Wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc.
    
13) Mountain Gas Transportation, Inc.            Wholly-owned subsidiary of Mountain Gas Resources, Inc.
    
14) Green River Gathering Company                A general partnership between Western Gas Resources, Inc.
                                                 and Mountain Gas Resources, Inc.
    
15) Western Power Services, Inc.                 Wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Gas Resources, Inc.
</TABLE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1