alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
F ILED U.S. COURT O F APP EALS EL EV EN TH C IRC UIT March 29 , 2 007 T HOMA S K. KA HN CLERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 06- 1295 1

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 05-03059 CV -T W T- 1 NATIONAL VIATICAL, INC., Pl ai nti ff -Appe llant, GROVER T. MITCHELL, DORIS E. MITCHELL, In te re ste d P ar tie sAppe llants , ve rs us H O N . JO HN O X EN D IN E , ind ivi dua lly and i n hi s official ca

pacity as Insurance C omm issio ner of G eorgia, De fendant-Appellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the N orthe rnD istri ct

of G eo rg ia

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ (M ar ch 29, 200 7)Honora ble Har vey E. Schlesing er, United States District J ud ge for the Middle District of * Florida , sitti ngby

desig nation. The Appe llee’s Motion for Awar d of Rule 38 Sanctions is DENI ED. 1 2 Before DU BIN A and COX , C ircuit Judg es, and SCHL ES IN GE R, D istrict Judg e. * PE R CU RIA M: The jud gm en t o f th e d is tri ctco ur t i s af firm ed . Se e W

es te rn &Sou the rn L ife In s. Co
. v . Sta te B d. of E

qual iza tio n , 451 U . S. 648 , 653 , 101 S . Ct . 207 0, 207 5 (1981). AFFIR MED. 1
Lone
Oak Acquisition Corporation

     

    Room 1708
Dominion Centre

    43-59
Queen’s Road East

    Wanchai,
Hong Kong

     

    
      
        
          	
                  _________________,
      2011

                


        

      

    

    


    BBS
Capital Fund, L.P.

    4975
Preston Park Boulevard

    Suite
775W

    Plano,
Texas 75093

    


    Rampant
Dragon, LLC

    6416
Santa Rosa Drive

    Plano,
Texas 75024

    


    Gentlemen:

     

    This letter will confirm our agreement
that commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration
statement (the “Registration Statement”) relating to the initial public offering
of the securities of Lone Oak Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) and
continuing until the consummation by the Company of a business combination or
the distribution of the funds held in the trust account to the Company’s then
public shareholders (as described in the Registration Statement), BBS Capital
Fund, L.P. and Rampant Dragon, LLC (the “Firms”) shall make available to the
Company certain general and administrative services, including the use of office
space, utilities and secretarial support, as may be required by the Company from
time to time, at [__________________] (or any successor location). In exchange
therefore, the Company shall pay the Firms at the rate of an aggregate of $7,500
per month.

    


    
      
        
          	 
      	
                  Very
      truly yours,

                
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                  LONE
      OAK ACQUSITION CORPORATION

                
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                  By: 

                	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                  Name:
      Baris Merzeci

                
	 
      	 
      	
                  Title:
      Chief Executive Officer

                


        

      

    

     

    
      
         


      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    Agreed to
and Accepted by:

     

    BBS
Capital Fund, LP

    


    
      
        
          
            	
                    By: 

                  	 
      
	 
      	
                    Name:

                  
	 
      	
                    Title:

                  
	
                    Rampant
      Dragon, LLC

                  
	 
      	 
      
	
                    By:

                  	 
      
	 
      	
                    Name:

                  
	 
      	
                    Title:

                  


          

        

      

    

     

    
      
         


      

      
        2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATSY N. SAKUMA,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT

OWNERS OF THE TROPICS AT WAIKELE, an incorporated association, by its board of directors; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

LOVE, YAMAMOTO & REVERE, LLP, a limited liability law partnership;
YAMAMOTO & REVERE, LLP, a liability law partnership,

Defendants. No. 19

- 16615

D.C. No. 1:16

- cv

- 00274

- DKW

KJM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii Derrick Kahala Watson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 20 , 202 1 * *

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 16615

Before: McKEOWN, CALLAHAN, and BRESS , Circuit Judges.

Patsy N. Sakuma appeals pro se from the district court’s post

- judgment

orders in her action alleging Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act

(“RICO”) and sta te law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review for an abuse of discretion. Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v.

ACandS, Inc. , 5 F.3d 1255, 1262

- 63 (9th Cir. 1993) . We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Sakuma’s Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) motion for relief from judgment, or by denying

leave to file a motion for reconsideration

, because Sakuma failed to demonstrate

any basis for the r equested relief. See id. ( setting forth grounds for relief under

Rule 59(e) or 60(b)); see also Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Co. , 452 F.3d 1097,

1102

- 04 (9th Cir. 2006) ( explaining that Rule 60(b)(6) relief may be granted only

where extraordinary circumstances are present).

We do not consider Sakuma’s contentions concerning her prior appeal ( Case

No. 16

- 16791 )

.

Sakuma’s request for judicial notice, set forth in her opening brief, is denied

as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.
DENY; and Opinion Filed June 25, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00424-CV

IN RE BUCKNER ADOPTION AND MATERNITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL, Relators

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-04583-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Molberg

Opinion by Justice Myers

 Before the Court is relators’ petition for writ of mandamus in which they contend the 

trial court abused its discretion by denying its motion to dismiss. Entitlement to mandamus relief 

requires relators to show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relators 

have no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) 

(orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the mandamus record, we conclude relators 

have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested.

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) 

(the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

190424F.P05

/Lana Myers/

LANA R. MYERS

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Capital Senior Floating, Ltd. (the “Company”), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kevin Braddish as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Penni F. Roll, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that:





|   |                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ KEVIN BRADDISHName:Kevin BraddishTitle:President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Date:March 14, 2018/s/ PENNI F. ROLLName:Penni F. RollTitle:Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)Date:March 14, 2018





The certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 6 -00 514 -CR De nise Whi te , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-06 -20 2625 , HO NORAB LE JULIE K OCUREK , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UMO P I N I O N Denise Wh i t e see ks to appea l an orde r def err ing a djudication enter ed af ter she pleade d guilty

to ag g ravated assault. The trial court ha s cer tified that this is a plea bar g ain ca se and Whit e has no rig ht of appe al. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2( a)( 2). The a ppeal is dismissed. Se eid . r ule 25.2(d).

__________________________________________ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Patter son and Puryear Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Nove mber 3, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2548 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2548

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6310 North University Street in Peoria, Illinois, as the ``Charles 
              `Chip' Lawrence Chan Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHARLES ``CHIP'' LAWRENCE CHAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6310 North University Street in Peoria, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Charles `Chip' Lawrence Chan Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Charles 
`Chip' Lawrence Chan Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 28, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2548

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6310 North University Street in Peoria, Illinois, as the ``Charles 
              `Chip' Lawrence Chan Post Office Building''.
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2529 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to repeal 

distributions for medicine qualified only if for prescribed drug or insulin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2011 

Ms. JENKINS (for herself, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. 

BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. LATTA, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. AUSTRIA, Mrs. CAPITO, 

Mr. JONES, Mr. COBLE, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. FRANK of 

Massachusetts, Mr. PAUL, Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. BILBRAY, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. POSEY, and Mrs. ELLMERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

to repeal distributions for medicine qualified only if for 

prescribed drug or insulin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Access to 

5 Medication Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2529 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DISTRIBUTIONS FOR MEDICINE QUALI2 FIED ONLY IF FOR PRESCRIBED DRUG OR IN3 SULIN. 

4 Section 9003 of the Patient Protection and Afford5 able Care Act (Public Law 111–148) and the amendments 

6 made by such section are repealed; and the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if such section, and 

8 amendments, had never been enacted. 

9 SEC. 3. RESCISSION OF UNSPENT FEDERAL FUNDS TO OFF10 SET LOSS IN REVENUES. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi12 sion of law, of all available unobligated funds, appro13 priated discretionary funds are hereby rescinded in such 

14 amounts as determined by the Director of the Office of 

15 Management and Budget such that the aggregate amount 

16 of such rescission equals the reduction in revenues to the 

17 Treasury by reason of the repeal, and amendments, made 

18 by section 2. 

19 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Director of the Office of 

20 Management and Budget shall determine and identify 

21 from which appropriation accounts the rescission under 

22 subsection (a) shall apply and the amount of such rescis23 sion that shall apply to each such account. Not later than 

24 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

25 Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall 

26 submit a report to the Secretary of the Treasury and ConVerDate Mar 15 2010 01:25 Jul 15, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2529.IH H2529

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2529 IH

1 gress of the accounts and amounts determined and identi2 fied for rescission under the preceding sentence. 

3 (c) EXCEPTION.—This section shall not apply to the 

4 unobligated funds of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

5 or the Social Security Administration. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 1

EXHIBIT 35.1

ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
OF THE SERVICERFOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2014

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of The Bank of
Nova Scotia, as Servicer and Cash Manager under the Servicing Agreement and Cash Management Agreement, respectively, do hereby
certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer and Cash Manager during the period from November 1, 2013 through October 31, 2014,
and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement and Cash Management Agreement was conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer and Cash Manager have fulfilled all of their obligations under
the Servicing Agreement and Cash Management Agreement, respectively, in all material respects throughout such period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this
Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this 29th day of January, 2015.



|By: | /s/ Jeffrey C. Heath                                                 
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | Jeffrey C. Heath
        Executive Vice-President and Group Treasurer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Federal Maritime Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

September 20, 2017; 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

800 N. Capitol Street NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

The first portion of the meeting will be held in Open Session; the second portion in Closed Session.

## Matters To Be Considered:

### Portions Open to the Public

1. Briefing by Commissioner Dye on the Supply Chain Innovation Teams and Update from Global Liner Shipping Asia Conference

2. Staff Briefing on Review Process for Carrier and Marine Terminal Operator Agreements

### Portions Closed to the Public

1. Staff Update on Petition of the Coalition for Fair Port Practices (P4-16)

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Rachel E. Dickon, Assistant Secretary (202) 523 5725.

Rachel E. Dickon,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-19847 Filed 9-14-17; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date:    November 15, 2004 By:      /s/ Joseph M. Cummins
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Joseph M. Cummins
                                    President, Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of First Keystone Financial, Inc.
(the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/ Rose M. DiMarco
--------------------------------
Name: Rose M. DiMarco
Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 29, 2004
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARTHUR MARTINEZ,

 Petitioner - Appellee,

 v.

JOHN MARSHALL, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellant.

No. 10-56029

D.C. No. 2:06-cv-07131-DDP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 11, 2013** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Warden John Marshall appeals from the district court’s judgment granting

Arthur Martinez’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition and its subsequent order

denying Marshall’s motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28

FILED

FEB 13 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-56029

U.S.C. § 2253, and we vacate and remand.

The district court granted Martinez relief on the ground that the state courts

had unreasonably applied federal law by concluding that “some evidence”

supported the Governor’s 2004 decision to deny Martinez parole. We review the

district court’s decision de novo. See Lambert v. Blodgett, 393 F.3d 943, 964 (9th

Cir. 2004). While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court held that the only

federal right at issue in the parole context is procedural, and the only proper

inquiry is what process the inmate received, not whether the state court decided the

case correctly. See Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S. Ct. 859, 862-63 (2011) (per

curiam). We accordingly vacate the judgment.

We remand for further proceedings on Martinez’s remaining claims.

VACATED and REMANDED.