alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w29wxjy






Exhibit 10.29(j)




AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made by and between Samuel
N. Hazen (the “Executive”) and HCA Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
effective as of February 9, 2011.



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, HCA Inc. previously entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”)
with the Executive dated November 16, 2006;



     WHEREAS, on November 22, 2010, the Company completed a corporate reorganization pursuant to
which the Company became the direct parent company of, and successor issuer to, HCA Inc. (the
“Corporate Reorganization”);



     WHEREAS, the Company assumed the Employment Agreement in connection with the Corporate
Reorganization; and



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement so as to
reflect the Executive’s appointment, responsibilities and duties as President-Operations of the
Company.



     NOW, THEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, and other valid consideration, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby amend the Employment Agreement
as follows:



     1. Amendment. Section 2(a) of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:



     “a. During the Employment Term, Executive shall serve as the President-Operations of the
Company. In such position, Executive shall have such duties, authority and responsibility as shall
be determined from time to time by the Chief Executive Officer which duties, authority and
responsibility are consistent with those attendant to such position with the Company with respect
to the business of the Company. Executive shall, if requested, also serve as a member of the Board
of Directors of any affiliate of the Company, without additional compensation.”



     2. Certain Definitions. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment not otherwise
defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Employment Agreement.



     3. Effect of Amendment. Except as modified hereby, the Employment Agreement shall
remain unaffected and in full force and effect.



     4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall
be an original but all of which shall constitute but one document.



[Signature page follows]




 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement, intending to be legally
bound, as of the date first stated above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	HCA HOLDINGS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	/s/ John M. Steele 
	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	John M. Steele 

	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Senior Vice President — Human Resources

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Samuel N. Hazen	 	 
	 	 	Samuel N. Hazen	 	 






2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           5,594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,596
<PP&E>                                          51,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,557
<BONDS>                                         21,460
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,644
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,116
<SALES>                                            433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   433
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,366)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       994
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,372)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,372)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
#### Melissa Ballas, Appellant, v Occupational and Sports Medicine of Brookhaven, P.C., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Submitted January 22, 2008;

decided March 25, 2008

*804Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 20, 2016.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-16-00508-CV

SM MONTERREY GROUP, LLC, Appellant

V.

ARTURO MACIAS AND INDOOR SOCCER ZONE, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-01924

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Evans

Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the parties’ 

motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2).

160508F.P05

/David Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

SM MONTERREY GROUP, LLC, 

Appellant

No. 05-16-00508-CV V.

ARTURO MACIAS AND INDOOR 

SOCCER ZONE, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-01924.

Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. 

Justices Lang and Myers participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 20th day of September, 2016.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Under
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 7, 2008
    /s/ GREGORY B. KENNYGregory B. KennyChief Executive OfficerDate:  May 7, 2008
    /s/ BRIAN J. ROBINSONBrian J. RobinsonChief Financial Officer  54
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

State of Texas, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00174

- CR v.

David Kent Smith, Appellee Appeal from the County Court of Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 40539 ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Mo rriss,

Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We further order that the appellant, State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 20, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT
JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Charles & Colvard, Ltd.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James R. Braun, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James R. Braun                                   
|James R. Braun                                       
|Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|May 12, 2005                                         



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Charles & Colvard, Ltd. and will be retained by Charles & Colvard, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the NHLBI Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Sex Hormone Induced Thromboembolism in Pre-
Menopausal Women.
    Date: October 11, 2017.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Kristen Page, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 
7185, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-7953, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#18736a716b6c7d763668797f7d58767170367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c677e657f786962227c6d6b694c626564226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 12, 2017.
 Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-19729 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00292

- CV

IN RE RONNIE TURNER RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

The court has considered r elator’ s petition for writ of mandamus and is of

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; WALKER and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 2 5 , 2010

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2427 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify a maintenance 

exemption regarding the removal of sediment, debris, and vegetation 

from certain structures. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 6, 2011 

Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California (for himself, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. 

DENHAM, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. BACA, Mr. ROHRABACHER, 

and Mr. COSTA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify 

a maintenance exemption regarding the removal of sediment, debris, and vegetation from certain structures. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flood Control Facility 

5 Maintenance Clarification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERMITS FOR DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL. 

7 Section 404(f) of the Federal Water Pollution Con8 trol Act (42 U.S.C. 1344(f)) is amended— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2427 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(B) by inserting ‘‘channels, 

2 basins,’’ after ‘‘such as’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(3) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(B), the 

5 term ‘maintenance’ includes the removal of sedi6 ment, debris, and vegetation from structures de7 scribed in that paragraph.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20412

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

THOMAS WAYNE EAST

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CR-493

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Thomas Wayne East appeals the sentence imposed by the district court

following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with the intent to distribute

crack cocaine. As his sole argument on appeal, East argues that the district

court erred by enhancing his sentence based on his possession of a dangerous

weapon pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1). East argues that the Government

failed to satisfy its burden of proving a temporal and spatial relationship

between the weapon and the drug-trafficking activity. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-20412

2

Although East’s sentence is ultimately reviewed for reasonableness, this

court must first determine whether the district court properly calculated his

Guideline sentencing range. United States v. Tzep-Mejia, 461 F.3d 522, 526-27

(5th Cir. 2006). East raised this challenge to his sentence in the district court.

Review of his argument is thus for clear error. See United States v. Juluke, 426

F.3d 323, 328 (5th Cir. 2005). 

Under § 2D1.1(b)(1), the base offense level of a defendant convicted of

drug-trafficking is increased by two levels “[i]f a dangerous weapon (including

a firearm) was possessed.” The Government has the burden of demonstrating by

a preponderance of the evidence that a temporal and spatial relation existed

between the weapon, the drug activity, and the defendant. Juluke, 426 F.3d at

328. “The adjustment should be applied if the weapon was present, unless it is

clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the offense.”

§ 2D1.1(b)(1), comment. (n.3). 

The Government established a spatial and temporal relationship between

the pistol and the offense. Before East exited the truck, the pistol was located

mere feet from the drugs that formed the basis of the conviction. Further, given

that East was carrying the drugs on his person, the district court could

reasonably have inferred that East was either selling the drugs from his person

or his truck, not his hotel room . Because the enhancement is plausible in light

of the record as a whole, we AFFIRM the conviction and the sentence.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                       SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                                   31937
<SECURITIES>                                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            81419
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              4376
<INVENTORY>                                                              59816
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        187621
<PP&E>                                                                  797654
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           78691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         1819248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   189521
<BONDS>                                                                1207978
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                                465050
<OTHER-SE>                                                              (51429)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                           1819248
<SALES>                                                                 505594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        505594
<CGS>                                                                   150480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           445678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          2108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       89181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         (31373)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             (8912)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     (22461)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            (22461)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 
|       | Deloitte &  Touche S.p.A. |
|------------|------------------------------------|
| ** ** | Via Tortona, 25                    |
|       | 20144 Milano                       |
| ** ** | Italia                             |
|       |                               |
|       | Tel: +39 02 83322111               |
|       | Fax:  +39 02 83322112              |
|       | www.deloitte.it                    |

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

**TOLUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A.**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.333-147724, 333-14006 and 333-9546 on Form S-8 of our reports dated April 21,2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financialstatement schedule of Luxottica Group S.p.A. (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph for the change in measurementdate related to the accounting for pension and postretirement plans effective December 31,2008 and for noncontrolling interests effective January 1, 2009), and theeffectiveness of Luxottica Group S.p.A.’s internal control over financialreporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Luxottica GroupS.p.A. for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

 

 

Milan, Italy

April 26, 2010

 

Ancona Bari Bergamo Bologna Brescia CagliariFirenze Genova Milano Napoli Padova Parma Perugia Roma Torino Treviso Verona

 

Sede legale: Via Tortona, 25 - 20144 Milano

Capital Sociale Euro 10.328.220.00 i.v.

Partita IVA/Codice Fiscale/Registro delle ImpreseMilano n. 03049560166 - R.E.A. Milano n. 1720239

 

Memberof Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION of CEO PURSUANT TO

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period from June 7, 2013
(Inception) to December 31, 2013 (the Report) of FS Investment Corporation III (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael C. Forman, the Chief Executive Officer of
the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2014  
|                       
|/s/  MICHAEL C. FORMAN 
|Michael C. Forman      
|Chief Executive Officer