alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

         COMPANY NAME                                           JURISDICTION OF
         ------------                                           INCORPORATION
                                                                -------------

     Audio Consultants Co., Ltd.                                Hong Kong

     Audio Consultants (Macau) Company Limited                  Macau

     Dynacord France S.A.                                       France

     EVI Audio (Aust) PTY Limited                               Australia

     EVI Audio France S.A.                                      France

     EVI Audio GmbH                                             Germany

     EVI Audio Holdings (Deutschland) GmbH                      Germany

     EVI Audio (Hong Kong) Ltd.                                 Hong Kong

     EVI Audio Japan, Ltd.                                      Japan

     Klark Teknik Group (UK) PLC                                England

     Saguaro Electronica, S.A. de C.V.                          Mexico

     Shuttlesound Limited                                       England

     TCI Exports Limited                                        Barbados

     Telex Communications International, Ltd.                   Delaware, U.S.

     Telex Communications, Ltd.                                 Ontario, Canada

     Telex Communications, S.A. de C.V.                         Mexico

     Telex Communications (SEA) PTE, Ltd.                       Singapore

     Telex Communications (UK) Ltd.                             England

     Telex Holdings (UK) Ltd.                                   England

     Tecnologia Especializada EDD, S.A. de C.V.                 Mexico
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF CHEROKEE C OUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 10th
day of December, 2014 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

IN THE INTEREST OF E . R., A C HILD

NO. 12

- 14

- 00171

- CV; Trial Court No. 2013

- 05

- 0334

Opinion by James T. Worthen, Chief Justice.

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in the se words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgm ent of the court

below be in all things affirmed , and that this decision be certified to the court below for

observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, this the 20 th day of February , 2015

.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CALIPER LIFE SCIENCES, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E.Kevin Hrusovsky, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ E. KEVIN HRUSOVSKY                |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | E. Kevin Hrusovsky                    |   |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

Date: November 9,2006

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of New
Media Investment Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    MICHAEL E.
REEDMichael E. Reed Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
March 19, 2014
Letterhead of:
Williams & Webster, P.S.
601 W. Riverside, Suite 1940
Spokane, WA 99201



Board of Directors of
Ramex Synfuels International, Inc.
Spokane, Washington

We consent to the use of our audit report dated March 2, 2000, except as
pertaining to Note 7 which was revised August 31, 2000 on the financial
statements  of  Ramex Synfuels  International, Inc. as of January 31, 2000
for filing with and attachment  to the  Form 10-Ks for  the year ended
January 31, 2000.


/s/ Williams & Webster, P.S.

Williams & Webster, P.S.
Certified Public Accountants
Spokane, Washington
August 31, 2000
# STATEOFLOUISIANA I I 

# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS SPECIALIST CALEB D. JONES

I NO. 2023 KW 0414 

### MAY 8, 2023
In Re: Specialist Caleb D. Jones,, applying for supervisory I writs, Special Court-Martial~ Parish of Lafayette, No. 2002-341. BEFORE: THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The military judge',s ruling finding that the military court has jurisdiction over , this matter is reversed. Under the facts and circumstances Qf this case where the incident did not occur on a military installation nor while relator and the victim were on duty of status, we find that a clear and convincing nexus between I the offense under the Louisiana Code of Military Justice and1the state military force I does not exist. See La. R.S. 29:102(C). Accordingly, the objection raising the exception of subject matter jurisdiction and motion to dismiss is granted. MRT CHH Chutz, J., dissents and would deny ~he application.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# O\.cJ) DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH MOSER, dba Marketing Support 

Systems, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION; UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA, 

Respondents.

No. 21-70099 

FCC No. EB-TCD-18-00028267 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Federal Communications Commission

Submitted March 16, 2023**

Before: WALLACE, D. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Kenneth Moser seeks review of a forfeiture order issued by the Federal 

Communications Commission (“FCC”), holding that Moser, doing business as 

Marketing Support Systems, violated the Truth in Caller ID Act of 2009, 47 U.S.C. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 16 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 

§ 227(e), by conducting a large-scale robocalling campaign using false caller 

identification information to display a number belonging to a business rival. We 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

The district court has exclusive jurisdiction over the petition because Moser 

seeks to avoid enforcement of a forfeiture order. See 47 U.S.C. § 504(a) (“The 

forfeitures provided for in this chapter . . . shall be recoverable . . . in a civil suit in 

the name of the United States brought in the district where the person or carrier has 

its principal operating office[.]”); Dougan v. F.C.C., 21 F.3d 1488, 1491 (9th Cir. 

1994) (“We hold that 47 U.S.C. § section 504(a) vests exclusive jurisdiction in the 

district courts to hear enforcement suits by the government, and suits by private 

individuals seeking to avoid enforcement.”). 

DISMISSED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-1838

PATRICIA A. ROSS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

INCO ALLOYS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, District

Judge. (CA-92-192-3)

Submitted: December 5, 1995 Decided: March 19, 1996

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patricia A. Ross, Appellant Pro Se. John Earl Jenkins, Jr.,

JENKINS, FENSTERMAKER, KRIEGER, KAYES & FARRELL, Huntington, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting

Appellee partial summary judgment and dismissing her claims of

employment discrimination on partial summary judgment and after a

bench trial. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Ross v. Inco Alloys International, Inc., No. CA-92-192-3 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 5, 1994; Apr. 4,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
| (logo) WELLS

      FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334

  |
|----------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

                Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

                1585 Broadway

                New York, New York 10036

                Attention: Stephen Holmes

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2013, by and among Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Certifiate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian, Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Trust Advisor, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2013-C11 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Richard K. Crump, as President and Chief Executive Officer of Sterling
Chemicals, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report of the Company for the period ending
June 30, 2004, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: August 10, 2004 /s/ RICHARD K. CRUMPRichard K. Crump,President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              OBJECT DESIGN, INC.
                            Financial Data Schedule
                                                                    Exhibit 27.1

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER  ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            12,593
<SECURITIES>                                       6,667
<RECEIVABLES>                                     13,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                       1,345
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  32,448
<PP&E>                                            12,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                     8,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    44,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             13,916
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              28
<OTHER-SE>                                        30,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      44,722
<SALES>                                           16,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  27,755
<CGS>                                                886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      6,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  25,001
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (3,637)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          43
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (3,680)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (3,680)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.13)


</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 12-10876 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cr-60259-WPD-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lPlaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAMIRO BETANCUR-VALENCIA, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llDefendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(July 17, 2012)

Before CARNES, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 12-10876 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 1 of 3 
Ramiro Betancur-Valencia appeals the sentencing court’s denial of a twolevel reduction to his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b)’s minor-role

provision. We review the district court’s denial of a minor-role reduction for clear

error. United States v. De Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 937 (11th Cir. 1999) (en banc). 

A defendant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he is

entitled to minor-role reduction. Id. at 939. When evaluating the propriety of a

minor-role reduction, the district court should consider the defendant’s role in the

relevant conduct for which he has been held accountable at sentencing, and his

role as compared to that of other participants in the relevant conduct. Id. at 940. 

In the drug courier context, district courts should consider the amount of drugs,

their fair market value, the amount of money paid or promised to the courier, any

equity interest the courier might have in the drugs, the courier’s role in planning

the scheme, and the courier’s role in distribution. Id. at 945. However, in the final

analysis, the decision of whether a drug courier qualifies for a minor-role

reduction “falls within the sound discretion of the trial court.” Id. 

Here, the district court properly applied the analytical framework set out in

De Varon. The district court relied on the amount of drugs smuggled internally by

Betancur-Valencia, the remuneration promised to him, and his partially successful

efforts to evade apprehension as proof of a heightened complicity incompatible

2

Case: 12-10876 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 2 of 3 
with the minor-role reduction. The district court did not clearly err by rejecting a

minor-role reduction. Accordingly, we affirm Betancur-Valencia’s sentence.

AFFIRMED.

3

Case: 12-10876 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

###### Information Security Oversight Office

          - [NARA-2017-065]

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

# ACTION:

Notice of advisory committee meeting

# SUMMARY:

We are announcing an upcoming National Industrial Security Program Policy Advisory Committee (NISPPAC) meeting, in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act and implementing regulation 41 CFR 101-6.

# DATES:

The meeting will be on November 1, 2017, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EST.

# ADDRESS:

National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Archivist's Reception Room, Room 105, Washington, DC 20408.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Robert Tringali, Program Analyst, by mail at ISOO, National Archives Building, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20408, by telephone at (202) 357-5335, or by email at                         *robert.tringali@nara.gov.*                         Contact ISOO at                         *ISOO@nara.gov*                         and the NISPPAC at                         *NISPPAC@nara.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of this meeting is to discuss National Industrial Security Program policy matters. The meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, you must submit the name and telephone number of individuals planning to attend to the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than Friday, October 27, 2017. ISOO will then provide additional instructions for accessing the meeting's location.

Patrice Little Murray,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-19721 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Consortium Service
Management Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31,  2003  (the  "Report"), I, Donald S. Robbins, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/  Donald  S.  Robbins
Dated:  May  14,  2003                 -----------------------------------------
                                       Donald  S.  Robbins
                                       President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-Q  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.










                                                                    Exhibit 99.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page