alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 2706 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To prohibit the sale of billfish. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Billfish Conservation Act of 

2012’’. 

SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) The United States carefully regulates its domestic fisheries for billfish and participates in international fishery 

management bodies in the Atlantic and Pacific. 

(2) Global billfish populations have declined significantly, 

however, because of overfishing primarily through retention 

of bycatch by non-United States commercial fishing fleets. 

(3) Ending the importation of foreign-caught billfish for 

sale in the United States aligns with U.S. management measures of billfish and protects the significant economic benefits 

to the U.S. economy of recreational fishing and marine commerce and the traditional cultural fisheries. 

SEC. 3. STATEMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. 

The Congress enacts this Act pursuant to clause 3 of section 

8 of article I of the Constitution. 

SEC. 4. PROHIBITION ON SALE OF BILLFISH. 

(a) PROHIBITION.—No person shall offer for sale, sell, or have 

custody, control, or possession of for purposes of offering for sale 

or selling billfish or products containing billfish. 

(b) PENALTY.—For purposes of section 308(a) of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 

1858(a)), a violation of this section shall be treated as an act 

prohibited by section 307 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 1857). 

(c) EXEMPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL FISHERIES AND MARKETS.— (1) Subsection (a) does not apply to billfish caught by 

US fishing vessels and landed in the State of Hawaii or Pacific 

Insular Areas as defined in section 3(35) of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 

1802(35)). 

(2) Subsection (a) does not apply to billfish landed by 

foreign fishing vessels in the Pacific Insular Areas when the 

foreign caught billfish is exported to non-US markets or 
H. R. 2706—2 

retained within Hawaii and the Pacific Insular Areas for local 

consumption. 

(d) BILLFISH DEFINED.—In this section the term ‘‘billfish’’— 

(1) means any fish of the species— 

(A) Makaira nigricans (blue marlin); 

(B) Kajikia audax (striped marlin); 

(C) Istiompax indica (black marlin); 

(D) Istiophorus platypterus (sailfish); 

(E) Tetrapturus angustirostris (shortbill spearfish); 

(F) Kajikia albida (white marlin); 

(G) Tetrapturus georgii (roundscale spearfish); 

(H) Tetrapturus belone (Mediterranean spearfish); and 

(I) Tetrapturus pfluegeri (longbill spearfish); and 

(2) does not include the species Xiphias gladius (swordfish). 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with this Report on Form 10-Q of AVAX Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Francois R. Martelet,
      Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                Francois R. MarteletFrancois
                R. MarteletPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer andPrincipal
                Financial Officer)August
                15, 2008
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2563 

To authorize a Wall of Remembrance as part of the Korean War Veterans 

Memorial and to allow certain private contributions to fund that Wall 

of Remembrance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2011 

Mr. HALL (for himself, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. COBLE, Mr. CONYERS, and Mr. DINGELL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize a Wall of Remembrance as part of the Korean 

War Veterans Memorial and to allow certain private contributions to fund that Wall of Remembrance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WALL OF REMEMBRANCE. 

4 Section 1 of the Act titled ‘‘An Act to authorize the 

5 erection of a memorial on Federal Land in the District 

6 of Columbia and its environs to honor members of the 

7 Armed Forces of the United States who served in the Ko8 rean War’’, approved October 25, 1986 (Public Law 99– 

9 572), is amended by adding at the end the following: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2563 IH

1 ‘‘Such memorial shall include a Wall of Remembrance. 

2 The American Battle Monuments Commission shall re3 quest and consider design recommendations from the Ko4 rean War Veterans Memorial Foundation, Inc. for the es5 tablishment of the Wall of Remembrance. The Wall of Re6 membrance shall include— 

7 ‘‘(1) a list by name of members of the Armed 

8 Forces of the United States who were killed in ac9 tion in the Korean War; 

10 ‘‘(2) the number of members of the Armed 

11 Forces of the United States who, in regards to the 

12 Korean War— 

13 ‘‘(A) were wounded in action; 

14 ‘‘(B) are listed as missing in action; or 

15 ‘‘(C) were prisoners of war; and 

16 ‘‘(3) the number of members of the Korean 

17 Augmentation to the United States Army, the Re18 public of Korea Armed Forces, and the other na19 tions of the United Nations Command who, in re20 gards to the Korean War— 

21 ‘‘(A) were killed in action; 

22 ‘‘(B) were wounded in action; 

23 ‘‘(C) are listed as missing in action; or 

24 ‘‘(D) were prisoners of war.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### Norton *against*Squire,

Where a carnage was put into the hands ant to pay-hím^aníTthe fhlTdffehdant 07theTarria°e TMore tha“ a year, and uscd it ay his own, and never sold it, it the defendant reasonable1 a thichhe^nght auctiondint C0“Id noi be aotd at pnvate sale, might be self as the purwST’tWgeable With the amount of the it!TM1 “aiJe to jyj¡tboth <b<?

IN ERROR, on certiorari to a Justice’s Court. *1*

. The defendant m error brought an action m the Court below, against the plaintin in error, to recover a sum of money due to the former, from the latter, on account of a carriage, which had been delivered to the parties in this suit by one Gerry, as payment or security for debts which he owed them. The carriage had been in the possession ° r the defendant below, for a year or more, and he had promised , , . , , . , . , ... , . the plaintiff below to pay him his demand, being 15 or 16 dollars, with some cents, as soon as he could sell it. The defendant used the carriage several times, and while it ivas in his possession, had had it repaired, the plaintiff having refused to bear part of the expense of repairs, and to use the carriage in common with the defendant. It ivas proved, ° * 7 that the defendant had twice offered to sell the carriage. The Justice gave judgment for the plaintiff below, the defendant in error, for 16 dollars, with costs.

*Per Curiam.*

The carriage was put into the hands of the defendant below, to pay debts due to him and the plaintiff below, and the only question is, whether the defendant is not, upon this testimony, to be considered as having elected to become the purchaser, and so liable to pay the demand due to the plaintiff. He had the possession bf the carriage upwards of a year, during which time he had it repaired on his own account, and used it during that period as his own, the plaintiff below having refused to concur in repairing it. It is true, that he twice offered to sell it, but such offers may have been collusive. He ought to have sold it at auction, if he could not have disposed of it by private sale. If he could keep the possession of the carriage, for a year, he might for two years, and the plaintiff below might never get his money. The defendant below bad a reasonable time to sell it, and not having done so, after being In possession upwards of a year, the Justice did right to *226consider him as the purchaser himself, and there is no complaint but that it was of sufficient value to pay both debts.

Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 033-54741, No. 33-66516,No. 333-00903, No. 333-13099 and 333-114446) and Form S-8 (No. 333-29711,No. 333-95255, No. 333-95259, No. 333-75732, No. 333-98107,No. 333-103682 and No. 333-103684) of Western Gas Resources, Inc.of our report dated March 11,2005, except for the restatement described in Note 2 to the consolidatedfinancial statements and the matter described in the third paragraph ofManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, as to whichthe date is December 18, 2005, relating to the financial statements, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Form 10-K/A.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

Denver,Colorado

December 18,2005

 

----
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 11
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      Three Months Ended                 Nine Months Ended
                                                          September 30,                      September 30,
                                                     1998              1997             1998              1997

                                                     -----             -----            -----             -----
                                                                 (in thousands, except per share data)
BASIC

<S>                                                     <C>              <C>                 <C>       <C>     
NET INCOME (LOSS)                                       $203             ($424)             $167         ($1,600)
/ WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES                              1,682             1,391             1,489           1,391

---------------------------                            -----            ------             -----          ------
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS)
   PER SHARE                                           $0.12            ($0.30)            $0.11          ($1.15)
===========================                            =====             =====             =====           =====


DILUTED

NET INCOME (LOSS)                                       $203             ($424)             $167         ($1,600)
/ WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES                              1,692             1,391             1,501           1,391

---------------------------                            -----             -----            ------           -----
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS)
   PER SHARE                                           $0.12            ($0.30)            $0.11          ($1.15)
===========================                            =====             =====             =====           =====
</TABLE>




Notes:
   - Weighted average shares outstanding have been adjusted to reflect the 10%
     stock dividends in 1998 and 1997.

   - Where applicable, diluted share computations include the effects of
     outstanding stock options.


                                       20
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 25, 2013

h0617

Order 

Clerk

June 25, 2013

145316(30)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145316

COA: 306256

Wayne CC: 06-006726-FC

MICHAEL TERRENCE CANNON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 29, 

2013 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
| **POWER                OF ATTORNEY**                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                    |
| **AEP                GENERATING COMPANY**                               |
| **Annual                Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended** |
| **December                31, 2006**                                    |

| /s/                Nicholas K. Akins    | /s/                Michael G. Morris    |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Nicholas                K. Akins                       | Michael                G. Morris                       |
|                                                   |                                                   |
| /s/                John B. Keane        | /s/                Robert P. Powers     |
| John                B. Keane                           | Robert                P. Powers                        |
|                                                   |                                                   |
| /s/                Holly K. Koeppel          | /s/                Stephen P. Smith               |
| Holly                K. Koeppel                        | Stephen                P. Smith                        |
|                                                   |                                                   |
EXHIBIT 21





SUBSIDIARIES OF ICONIX BRAND GROUP,
INC




Bright Star Footwear
LLC


a New Jersey limited liability
company





Badgley Mischka Licensing
LLC


a Delaware limited liability
company





IP Holdings and Management
Corporation


a Delaware
corporation





IP Holdings LLC


a Delaware limited liability
company





IP Management LLC


a Delaware limited liability
company





Licensing Acquisition
Corp.


a Delaware
corporation





Michael Caruso & Co.,
Inc.


a California
corporation





Naxford Trading S.A.
(inactive)


a Uruguay
corporation





Ponca, Ltd.
(inactive)


a Hong Kong
corporation





Showroom Holding Co.,
Inc.


a New York
corporation





Unzipped Apparel LLC


a Delaware limited liability
company





Yulong Company Limited
(inactive)


a British Virgin Islands
corporation





Mossimo Holdings LLC


a Delaware limited liability
company





Mossimo, Inc.


a Delaware
corporation





Mossimo Management
LLC


a Delaware limited liability
company





OP Holdings LLC


a Delaware limited liability
company




OP Holdings and Management
Corporation


a Delaware
corporation





Studio IP Holdings
LLC


a Delaware limited liability
company





Studio Holdings and Management
Corporation


a Delaware
corporation





Official Pillowtex
LLC


a Delaware limited liability
company





Pillowtex Holdings and Management
LLC


a Delaware
corporation




Icon JV Holdings LLC
 a Delaware
corporation


IP Holdings Unltd
LLC
 a Delaware
corporation
<PAGE>

                                AMERIKING, INC.

               CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Dec. 29, 1998 to      Dec. 30, 1997 to
                                         Sep. 27, 1999         Sep. 28, 1998
                                     --------------------- ---------------------
                                      W/O PIK    With PIK   W/O PIK    With PIK
                                     Dividends  Dividends  Dividends  Dividends
                                     ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S>                                  <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
EARNINGS
  Income (loss) before income taxes
   benefit.........................   1,297,000  1,297,000  2,523,000  2,523,000
  Interest expense.................  15,187,000 15,187,000 12,116,000 12,116,000
  Amortization of deffered
   financing costs.................     642,000    642,000    640,000    640,000
  Portion of rents representative
   of interest.....................   6,807,000  6,807,000  5,206,000  5,206,000
  Preferred stock PIK dividends....         --     435,000        --     338,000
                                     ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
    Total earnings.................  23,933,000 24,368,000 20,485,000 20,823,000
                                     ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

FIXED CHARGES
  Interest expense.................  15,187,000 15,187,000 12,116,000 12,116,000
  Amortization of deffered
   financing costs.................     642,000    642,000    640,000    640,000
  Portion of rents representative
   of interest.....................   6,807,000  6,807,000  5,206,000  5,206,000
  Preferred stock PIK dividends....         --     435,000        --     338,000
                                     ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
    Total Fixed Charges............  22,636,000 23,071,000 17,962,000 18,300,000
                                     ========== ========== ========== ==========
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES.        1.06       1.06       1.14       1.14
                                     ========== ========== ========== ==========
INSUFFICIENT EARNINGS TO COVER
 FIXED CHARGES.....................         N/A        N/A        N/A        N/A
                                     ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-26-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-26-2000
<CASH>                                          11,115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  125,468
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     67,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               239,200
<PP&E>                                       1,231,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                 855,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 891,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          210,947
<BONDS>                                        349,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           442
<OTHER-SE>                                     296,134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   891,023
<SALES>                                        150,379
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,010,798
<CGS>                                          101,953
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  659,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,032
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                155,977
<INCOME-TAX>                                    62,392
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             93,585
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,585
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.58


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the **

District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARISA GARCIA-VILLAREAL,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 05-76719

Agency No. A096-234-295

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 16, 2010

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and COLLINS, District

Judge.** 

Marisa Garcia-Villareal is a native and citizen of Mexico who petitions for

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) holding that her

California conviction for welfare fraud rendered her ineligible for cancellation of

FILED

OCT 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). She contends that she is eligible for

cancellation because § 1229b(b)(1)(C)’s reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2) does

not apply to her as an alien who was never admitted. 

Garcia-Villareal’s argument is foreclosed by this court’s decision in

Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. Ashcroft, 390 F.3d 649 (9th Cir. 2004). In GonzalezGonzalez, we rejected the argument that “crimes of domestic violence” listed in

§ 1227(a)(2) did not apply to the alien in that case because he had never been

admitted. Id. at 653. We held that § 1229b(b)(1)(C)’s reference to an alien who

“has not been convicted of an offense under section . . . 1227(a)(2)” clearly meant

a conviction “described under” that section, and therefore that an alien can be

barred from cancellation by a conviction for an offense described under §

1227(a)(2) even if the alien is not deportable under that section. Id. at 652. 

We also recognized in Gonzalez-Gonzalez that Chevron deference to the

BIA would apply if § 1229b(b)(1)(C) were ambiguous. Id. at 651. Here, even if

we were to hold that § 1229b(b)(1)(C) is ambiguous insofar as it may apply to a

person seeking to qualify for the petty offense exception to a crime involving

moral turpitude under § 1182(a)(2)(A)(ii)(II), the same Chevron deference would

apply. The BIA has recently issued a published opinion holding that the petty

offense exception is irrelevant when an alien is otherwise ineligible for
3

cancellation because of a conviction for a crime described under § 1227(a)(2). See

Matter of Almanza-Arenas, 24 I. & N. Dec. 771, 776 (BIA 2009). As the BIA’s

interpretation of the statute is reasonable, Garcia-Villareal’s attempt to distinguish

Gonzalez-Gonzalez as dealing with a separate provision in the deportability statute

fails. 

The petition for review is DENIED.