alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

R.S., the mother,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2530

[December 6, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Gregory M. Keyser, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2018DP000740/JL.

David J. Joffe of Joffe Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Andrew Feigenbaum of Children’s Legal Services, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

Thomasina Moore and Laura J. Lee of Florida Statewide Guardian ad 

Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 12(a)**

I, Keith Barr, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report anychange in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: 1 March 2018 

/s/ Keith Barr 

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the quarterly  report of LaSalle  Brands  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September  30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Frank Holdraker,  certify to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Frank Holdraker
---------------------------
Frank Holdraker, Chairman
November 14, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2627 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2627

 To suspend temporarily the duty certain electrical transformers rated 
                                at 40VA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2011

  Mr. Markey (for himself and Mr. McGovern) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty certain electrical transformers rated 
                                at 40VA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS RATED AT 40VA.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      120 volt/60 Hz      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        electrical                                                         31/2014.......
                        transformers,
                        each with
                        dimensions of 86
                        mm by 71 mm by 91
                        mm, containing a
                        layered and uncut
                        round core with
                        two balanced
                        bobbins, the
                        foregoing rated
                        at 40VA (provided
                        for in subheading
                        8504.31.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2771 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2771

  To amend Public Law 89-732 to increase to 5 years the period during 
which a Cuban national must be physically present in the United States 
  in order to qualify for adjustment of status to that of a permanent 
                   resident, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2011

  Mr. Rivera introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend Public Law 89-732 to increase to 5 years the period during 
which a Cuban national must be physically present in the United States 
  in order to qualify for adjustment of status to that of a permanent 
                   resident, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF RULES REGARDING ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS FOR 
              CUBAN REFUGEES.

    Section 1 of Public Law 89-732 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``one year,'' and inserting ``five 
        years,''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following: ``An alien shall be 
        ineligible for adjustment of status under this section if the 
        alien returns to Cuba after admission or parole into the United 
        States. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall rescind the 
        status of an alien who obtained adjustment of status under this 
        section if the alien returns to Cuba before being admitted to 
        citizenship in accordance with title III of the Immigration and 
        Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.), and the alien shall 
        thereafter be subject to all the provisions of such Act to the 
        same extent as if the adjustment of status had not been 
        made.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                          17,244
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,749
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,535
<PP&E>                                          10,149
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,133
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,764
<BONDS>                                             89
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           182
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,570
<SALES>                                        142,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,768
<CGS>                                           63,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,707
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,175
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

12:00 a.m., Tuesday, September 26, 2017.

# PLACE: 

U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE., 3rd Floor, Washington, DC.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Determination on FOUR original jurisdiction cases.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jacqueline Graham, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE., 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20530, (202) 346-7001.

 Dated: September 18, 2017.

J. Patricia W. Smoot,

Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 2017-20135 Filed 9-18-17; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 4410-31-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 18, 2005, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of JMAR
Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of JMAR Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-47390, effective
July 2, 1993, 33-96848 effective August 14, 1996, 333-46392 effective October 5,
2000, 333-67056 effective October 11, 2001, 333-72860 effective June 13, 2002,
333-104640 effective May 23, 2003, 333-110258 effective December 18, 2003,
333-111993 effective January 29, 2004, and 333-112639 effective February 17,
2004) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-33902 effective April 3, 2000, 333-33904
effective April 3, 2000, 333-111994 effective January 16, 2004, 333-112059
effective January 21, 2004, 333-112060 effective January 21, 2004 and
333-118189 effective August 13, 2004).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Irvine, California
March 18, 2005
#### UNITED STATES of America v. RADIO CORPORATION OF AMERICA and National Broadcasting Company, Inc.

Civ. A. No. 21743.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

July 17, 1957.

Bernard M. Hollander, Raymond M. Carlson, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, by Bernard G. Segal and Edward W. Mullinix, Philadelphia, Pa., Cahill, Gordon, Reindel & Ohl, New York City, by Lawrence J. McKay, Dennis G. Melnerney, New York City, for defendants.

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

The general policy against disclosure of proceedings before a grand jury has been invoked by the Government in the course of the argument, but the scope of that policy need not be considered here, because the defendants’ motion for the production of the grand jury minutes must be denied upon entirely different grounds.

The defendants contend that Jeneks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657, 77 S.Ct. 1007, 1 L.Ed.2d 1103, and United States v. Rosenberg, 3 Cir., 245 F.2d 870, are controlling, but neither of those decisions goes any further than to hold that disclosure of prior statements of a person, made either to a government agent or before a grand jury, may be compelled for the purpose of impeaching him when called as a witness in the course of a criminal proceeding. In the present case the discovery is asked for not for impeachment but for the purpose of obtaining information to be used by the defendants in the preparation of their case. It may be that some of the witnesses who appeared before the grand jury will be called at the trial, but, before the applicability of the Jeneks and Rosenberg decisions can be considered, the witness must be actually called or, at least, the prospect of his being called must be definite and immediate.

The question, therefore, before me at the present time is simply whether good cause, under Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 34, 28 U.S.C., has been shown for the request for the production of a document or documents. On this point, the Court of Appeals for this circuit has indicated pretty definitely that, if a party has the names of the witnesses whose statements he wants and can interview them or take their depositions without undue burden or delay, he would be “unable to show such special circumstances * * * as would justify production of the statements in question.” Alltmont v. U. S., 3 Cir., 177 F.2d 971, 979. There would seem to be no difficulty in the present *104case about interviewing the witnesses or taking their depositions. I do not think that a showing of good cause has been made.

The defendants’ motion is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2767 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2767

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 8 West Silver Street in Westfield, Massachusetts, as the ``William T. 
                      Trant Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. WILLIAM T. TRANT POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8 West Silver Street in Westfield, Massachusetts, shall be 
known and designated as the ``William T. Trant Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William T. 
Trant Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY

#### Shirley Contracting Corp. v. Harold C. King, Commissioner, et al.

January 4, 1984

Case No. (Law) 24462

By JUDGE CHARLES H. DUFF

I have carefully considered the memoranda and able arguments presented at argument of the Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery. Likewise I have carefully examined the decisions of *Upjohn*v. *United States,*449 U.S. 383, 101 S. Ct. 677 (1981), and *Binks Manufacturing Company*v. *National Presto Industries, Inc.,*709 F.2d 1109 (1983).

It is noted that most of the documents requested were either addressed to or copied to Mr. Hayes. A number of them contain the impressions and opinions of their author regarding various aspects of this litigation. All of the documents involved postdated the Notice of Intent filed by the contractor and all but one postdated the actual filing of the Claim by the contractor.

While the *Upjohn*decision differs in several significant factual areas, it is my opinion that the underlying philosophical basis for denying discovery therein is apropos to the case at bar. It seems to me to be essential that reports, evaluations and recommendations of personnel in the field be candid and open if their purpose is to be served. The *Binks*decision, while appearing to be a correct one on its facts, is clearly distinguishable. The exchange . of correspondence between the parties did not demonstrate *150any anticipation of litigation and accordingly the work product privilege was held not to apply.

Furthermore to deny the disclosure of the documents sought is not to deny the discovery of relevant factual information possessed by the authors of those documents. The following comment in *Upjohn*is apropos:

> Here the Government was free to question the employees who communicated with Thomas and outside counsel. Upjohn has provided the IRS with a list of such employees, and the IRS has already interviewed some 25 of them. While it would probably be more convenient for the Government to secure the results of petitioner’s internal investigation by simply subpoenaing the questionnaires and notes taken by petitioner’s attorneys, such considerations of convenience do not overcome the policies served by the attorney-client privilege.

For these reasons the Motion will be denied and the Plaintiff’s exceptions will be noted. I am returning the relevant documents to the Attorney General.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,121
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (40)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,673
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,149
<PP&E>                                           8,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,398)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,611
<BONDS>                                         69,357
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,919
<SALES>                                         69,588
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,588
<CGS>                                           37,760
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,072
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,249
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                823
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       823
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>