alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2660 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2660

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 122 North Holderrieth Boulevard in Tomball, Texas, as the ``Tomball 
                        Veterans Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TOMBALL VETERANS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 122 North Holderrieth Boulevard in Tomball, Texas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Tomball Veterans Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tomball 
Veterans Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 16, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2660

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 122 North Holderrieth Boulevard in Tomball, Texas, as the ``Tomball 
                        Veterans Post Office''.
```
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 11 43

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ja m es Eug en e Wolf ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt v. Hoe ne Rid ge Subd iv is io n; Kell y A. Kell y ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Eas te rnDis tri ctof M is so ur i - St . Lou is

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Aug us t 1 , 20 16 Fi le d: Octo be r 14 , 20 16 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, BENTO N, andKELLY , Cir cu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM. Ja m es Eug en e W ol f ap p e al s th e di st ric t co urt’s or de r di sm is si ng hi s cl ai m s 1 un de r 18 U.S.C. §§ 24 1, 24 2, 84 4, an d 19 61 et se q. ; an d 42 U.S.C. §§ 36 31 an d 12 10 1 et seq . Havi ng juri sd ic ti on un de r 28 U.S.C. § 1 29 1, t hi s co urt af firm s. The Hon or ab le Ro nn ie L. Whi te , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e East ern 1 Dis tri ctof M is so ur i.A care fu l rev ie w of th e reco rd rev eal s th at W ol f is no t en ti tl ed to rel ie f fo r th e

reas on s s ta te d b y

th e d is tri ctco urt. The m ot io n t o s tri ke ap pe ll ees ’ br ie f is de ni ed . The jud gm en t o f th e d is tri ctco urt i s af firm ed . Se e 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2 -
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CALIPER LIFESCIENCES, INC.

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E.Kevin Hrusovsky, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|        | /s/ E. KEVIN HRUSOVSKY                |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | E. Kevin Hrusovsky                    |   |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

Date: August 9,2006

1

----
EXHIBIT
32.1




ICONIX
BRAND GROUP, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Neil Cole,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Neil ColeNeil
      ColePresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer





February
27, 2009
Exhibit A dated February 21, 2011 to the Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.44 

 

 

  

			
	 To:
	  	Tom Barker
	From:	  	West Corporation Compensation Committee
	Date:	  	February 21, 2011
		
	Re:	  	Exhibit A


This Exhibit A for 2011 is entered into pursuant to your Employment Agreement. 

 

	1.	Your base salary will be $900,000. 

  

	2.	Effective January 1, 2011, you will be eligible to receive a bonus based upon West Corporation’s consolidated EBITDA for the year. Your bonus shall be earned
in three tranches. Tranche 1 will be earned if 2011 consolidated EBITDA is equal to 2010 consolidated EBITDA. Tranche 2 will be earned if 2011 consolidated EBITDA is greater than 2010 consolidated EBITDA but equal to or less than $670 million.
Tranche 3 will be earned if 2011 consolidated EBITDA is greater than $670 million. The bonus calculation for each tranche is outlined below. 

  

			
	 	  	Bonus / Millions
	 Tranche 1
	  	$1,577
	 Tranche 2
	  	$28,022
	 Tranche 3
	  	$47,170

 A maximum of 75% of
the pro-rata portion of the Bonus earned for Tranches 1 and 2 may be advanced quarterly. If any portion of the bonuses is advanced, it will be paid within thirty (30) days from the end of the quarter. 100% of the total bonuses earned will be
paid no later than February 28, 2012. In the event there is a negative calculation at the end of any quarter and a pro-rata portion of any bonus has been advanced in a previous quarter, a “loss carry forward” will result and be
applied to the next quarterly or year-to-date calculation. In the event that at the end of the year, or upon your termination if earlier, the aggregate amount of the bonuses which have been advanced exceeds the amount of bonus that otherwise would
have been payable for 2011 (in the absence of advances) based on the performance during 2011 (or, in the case of your termination, based on the performance during 2011 and the projection for performance for the balance of 2011 as of your termination
date), then the amount of such excess may, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, either (i) result in a “loss carry forward” which shall be applied to the quarterly or year-to-date calculation of bonuses and or salary
payable in subsequent periods, or (ii) be required to be paid back to the company upon such request. 
 All objectives are
based on West Corporation’s consolidated operations and will not include EBITDA for mergers, acquisitions or joint ventures, unless specifically and individually approved by West Corporation’s Compensation Committee. 

 

	3.	At the discretion of the Compensation Committee, you may receive an additional bonus based on the Company’s and your individual performance.


  

			
	 /s/ Tom Barker
	 	
	 Employee – Tom Barker
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


       In  connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  of  Consortium
Service  Management  Group,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"),  I, K. Bruce Jones, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

       (2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 16, 2005
                                                     /s/ K. Bruce Jones
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     K. Bruce Jones
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


       The above  certification  is furnished  solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
Michael T. Miller, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Installed Building Products, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 28, 2014



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael T. Miller                               
|Michael T. Miller                                   
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.31  SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE WESTERN GAS RESOURCES, INC. 1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN  This Second Amendment to the
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan is made this 30th
day of June, 2002, effective June 30, 2002.  RECITALS  A.The Board of Directors adopted the Western
Gas Resources, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan (the Plan).  B.Section 4(d) of the Plan authorizes the Board
of Directors to amend the Plan.  C.The Board of Directors desires to amend the
Plan to make the modifications set forth herein.  NOW, THEREFORE,the Western Gas Resources, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan is amended as
follows:  1.Section 9.e. is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following:  e.Options may be exercised, in whole or in
part, by the surrender (or delivery) to the Company of previously acquired
shares of Company common stock held for greater than six months. This method of
exercise is to include the constructive exchange (or surrendering) of Company
stock already owned and held for greater than six months (Payment Shares) in
payment for the shares to be received under the option exercise in lieu of
actually tendering such Company stock to the Company. If the Payment Shares are
held by a registered securities broker for the optionee in street name, the
optionee will provide the Company with a notarized statement attesting to the
number of shares owned that are intended to serve as Payment Shares. If the
Company stock certificates are actually held by the optionee, he shall provide
the Company with their certificate numbers. Upon receipt of a notarized
statement regarding ownership of the Payment Shares, or upon confirmation of
ownership of the Payment Shares by reference to Company records, the Company
shall treat the Payment Shares as being constructively exchanged. The Company
shall then issue to the employee a certificate for a net number of shares: the
number of shares subject to the option exercise less the number of Payment
Shares. The exchange price for the Payment Shares under the respective option
exercise will be the Fair Market Value of the Company common stock as
determined in 2.g. above as of the effective date of the exchange.  
   2.Except
as hereby amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed by the Board of
Directors and its provisions shall remain in full force and effect.  ADOPTED by the
Board of Directors of Western GasResources,
Inc. effective as of the date first set forth above.  WESTERN GAS
  RESOURCES, INC.By
  /s/
  John C. WalterTitle
  Executive Vice President


---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15300 and #15301; PUERTO RICO Disaster Number PR-00030]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-4336-DR), dated 09/10/2017.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Irma.                    

*Incident Period:*                         09/05/2017 and continuing.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 09/16/2017.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/09/2017.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/11/2018.                    

# ADDRESSES:

 Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, dated 09/10/2017, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Aguas Buenas, Barranquitas, Bayamon, Camuy, Catano, Ciales, Comerio, Hatillo, Jayuya, Las Piedras, Quebradillas, Salinas, San Juan, Vega Baja, Yauco                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2017-20321 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Frank PIRO, Plaintiff, v. PORT LINES, Ltd., Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, The Associated Operating Company, Third Party Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 17535.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

July 3, 1958.

*232Lindenbaum & Young, Brooklyn, N. Y., Standard, Weisberg, Harolds & Malament, New York City (Alan H. Buchsbaum, Cliffside Park, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Thomas F. Keane, Brooklyn, N. Y. (Francis P. Cunnion, Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for third party defendant.

BYERS, Chief Judge.

The third party defendant above named, by this motion, seeks to vacate interrogatories heretofore served upon it by the plaintiff.

The action is to recover damages for personal injuries said to have been suffered by plaintiff on January 9, 1956 while he was working on the S. S. Port of Quebec, owned, operated and controlled (it is assumed) by the defendant.

The plaintiff was an employee of the third party defendant, a stevedoring company, against whom defendant asserts the usual indemnity responsibility contingent upon plaintiff’s recovery against it.

In this state of affairs, it is difficult to understand why the plaintiff is entitled to propound the interrogatories, since he has no cause of action, or claim for relief, against his employer, in view of the Longshoremen’s etc. Act, nor has he any claim for indemnity, such as the defendant is presumed to assert.

In other words, while the third party defendant has become a party to the cause, it is not an “adverse party” to the plaintiff, within Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. Rule 33, 28 U.S.C.A.

So much appears from the moving affidavit, and no answering affidavit has been filed reciting issues raised as against the *plaintiff,*in the answer of the third party defendant. Nor do such issues suggest themselves. The contest between the third parties involves two questions: (A) Was there an indemnity agreement, express or implied? (B) If so, can the third party plaintiff successfully assert a claim for relief by virtue thereof, against the third party defendant ?

It is not apparent how the plaintiff’s asserted cause against the defendant can entitle him to interrogate the third party defendant, and as to such of said interrogatories as it has not waived objection, the motion to vacate is granted.

See M. Y. M. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., D.C., 20 F.R.D. 296 for a helpful discussion.

Settle order.
<PAGE>
                                                         Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                             AEP GENERATING COMPANY
                 Annual Report on Form lO-K for the Fiscal Year
                                      Ended
                                December 31, 1998

      The undersigned  directors of AEP GENERATING  COMPANY, an Ohio corporation
(the "Company"),  do hereby constitute and appoint E. LINN DRAPER,  JR., ARMANDO
A.  PENA and  HENRY W.  FAYNE,  and each of them,  their  attorneys-in-fact  and
agents,  to execute for them,  and in their  names,  and in any and all of their
capacities,  the Annual Report of the Company on Form lO-K,  pursuant to Section
13 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1998, and any and all  amendments  thereto,  and to file the same,  with all
exhibits  thereto  and  other  documents  in  connection  therewith,   with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission,  granting unto said  attorneys-in-fact  and
agents,  and each of them,  full power and authority to do and perform every act
and thing required or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes
as the undersigned might or could do in person,  hereby ratifying and confirming
all that said  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned have signed these presents this 24th
day of February, 1999.


  /s/ E. Linn Draper,Jr.              /s/ Wm. J. Lhota
E. Linn Draper, Jr.                 Wm. J. Lhota


  /s/ Henry W. Fayne                  /s/ James J. Markowsky
Henry W. Fayne                      James J. Markowsky


  /s/ John R. Jones, III              /s/ Armando A. Pena
John R. Jones, III                  Armando A. Pena
Order entered April 30 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01261 - CV EX PARTE MICHAEL GER OD MCGREGOR, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Te xas Trial Court Cause No. X - 13 - 1459 - W 

### O RDER The record before us reflects this appeal could be either (1) an ordinary appeal, filed within the fifteen

- day extension period provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3 but without the required extens ion motion ; or (2) a restricted appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 30 but with a defi cient notice of appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.1(d)(7) & 30 (together setting forth requirements for restricted appeal); 26.1 (setting deadline for filing ord inary appeal); 26.3 (outlining procedure for obtaining extension). Accordingly, b y letter dated April 1, 2015 , appellant was directed to file either (1) a motion to extend time to file notice of ordinary appeal or (2) an amended notice of appeal reflectin g he is pursuing a restricted appeal
. Rather than filing either an extension motion or an amended notice of appeal, however, appellant , who is proceeding pro se, has filed both. He also has filed a “ motion for leave to file [ both ]
. ”An appeal cannot proceed as both an ordinary appeal and a restricted appeal
. See generally id. 25.1, 26.1, 30. B ecause the standard of a ppellate review in a restricted appeal is more limited than the standard in an ordinary appeal, we GRANT the motion to permit late fili ng of notice of ordinary appeal and DENY as moot t he other filings. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3; Champion v. Estlow , 2015 WL 513274, 03

- 14

- 00016

- CV *1 (Tex. App.

- – Austin 2015, pet. filed); Davenport v. Scheble , 201 S.W.3d 188, 193 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2006, pet . denied). We deem the notice of appeal filed June 7 , 2014 timely for jurisdictional purposes
. We note the clerk’s record has been filed. We further note the reporter has informed the Court that no reporter’s record exists of the trial court proceedings
. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file his brief on the merits no later than June 1, 2015. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.6.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE