alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2735 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2735

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the look-
   through treatment of payments between related controlled foreign 
                             corporations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2011

Mr. Boustany (for himself and Mr. Kind) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the look-
   through treatment of payments between related controlled foreign 
                             corporations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOOK-THROUGH TREATMENT OF PAYMENTS BETWEEN RELATED 
              CONTROLLED FOREIGN CORPORATIONS MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (C) of section 954(c)(6) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``and before 
January 1, 2012,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after December 31, 
2011, and to taxable years of United States shareholders with or within 
which such taxable years of foreign corporations end.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>   U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998 
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1 
<CASH>                                              16,810 
<SECURITIES>                                         6,200 
<RECEIVABLES>                                       14,709 
<ALLOWANCES>                                           775 
<INVENTORY>                                              0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    38,049 
<PP&E>                                              12,936 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       8,745 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      45,150 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               13,027 
<BONDS>                                                 22 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                                28 
<OTHER-SE>                                          32,073 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        45,150 
<SALES>                                             32,234 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    45,256 
<CGS>                                                1,249 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        9,097 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    33,606 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      3,250 
<INCOME-TAX>                                           324 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  2,926 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,926 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .11 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .10 
                                               

</TABLE>
Opinion issued August 20 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 15 - 00447 - CV

——————————— JOE HENDERSON , Appella nt

V. TEXAS BELTING & MILL SUPPLY COMPANY , Appell e e On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1061068
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Joe Henderson, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 20.1; see also T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil2

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13

- 91 27 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond
. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c)
. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes , Massengale , and Lloyd
.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7549

JIMMY G. BLAKELY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COUNTY OF GREENVILLE; GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; GERALD SEALS; JIM DORRIETY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CA-98-2468-0-24)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy G. Blakely, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr.,

CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROVES, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy G. Blakely appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Blakely v. County of Greenville, No. CA-98-2468-0-24 (D.S.C. Oct.

29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
f8k021111ex10i_westergaard.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


Supply Agreement


 




	Seller:	Contract No.:
	 	Place of Signing:





Buyer: Fujian Jinjiang Chendai Ansheng Shoes and Clothing Co., Ltd. Date:







1. Name, Specification, Quantity, Price, Delivery Schedule and Quality of the Product



	
Item

	
Specification

	
Unit

	
Quantity

	
Price

	
Amount

	
Delivery Schedule


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 












2. Quality and Technical Standards, Period and Condition of Quality Guarantee: 


Subject to the sample provided after the order is confirmed.







3. Method and Place of Delivery: Ansheng’s warehouse







4. Method, Destination and Cost of Transportation:


The Seller shall bear all the shipping cost.







5. Package Standard, Supply and Recovery of the Packing Material:


Subject to the order.







6. Standard and Method of Inspection and Acceptance, Period for Objection:


Subject to the sample and quality control manual supplied by the Seller.







7. Period and Method of Payment:


When requested by the Buyer, the Supplier shall deliver the products with the ordered quality and quantity to the place designated by the Buyer along with the necessary invoices and documents. The Buyer shall make the payment within 2 month after the delivery.







8. Breach of Contract:


If there is any damage or loss caused by a) delay of delivery; b) quality problem; and/or c) lack of quantity, the Supplier shall bear the liability.







9. Dispute Settlement:


By friendly consultations.







10. Miscellaneous







11. There are two counterparts of this Agreement. This Agreement shall take effect at the date hereof.








	
Buyer

	
Seller


	
Company Name: Fujian Jinjiang Chendai Ansheng Shoes and Clothing Co., Ltd.

	
Company Name:


	
Address:

	
Address:


	
Legal Representative:

	
Legal Representative:


	
Agent:

	
Agent:


	
Tel:

	
Tel:


	
Bank Name:

	
Bank Name:


	
Bank Account:

	
Bank Account:


	
Taxpayer Identification Number:

	
Taxpayer Identification Number:
ACCEPTED

12-15-00010-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

5/20/2015 2:35:45 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 5/20/2015 2:35:45 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
#### In re Jeffrey J. PROSSER, Appellant.

No. 08-2692.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Dec. 1, 2009.

Opinion filed: July 23, 2010.

Norman A. Abood, Esq., Toledo, OH, Alex M. Moskowitz, Esq., A.J. Weiss *&*Associates, St. Thomas, VI, for Appellant.

Michaela C. Crocker, Esq., Thomas S. Leatherbury, Esq., Daniel C. Stewart, Vinson *&*Elkins, Dallas, TX, James H. Mora-wetz, Esq., Office of United States Trustee, Atlanta, GA, J. Daryl Dodson, Esq., Moore, Dodson & Russell, Charlotte Ama-lie, St. Thomas USVI, Toby L. Gerber, Esq., Fulbright & Jaworski, Dallas, TX, Gregg M. Galardi, Esq., Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Wilmington, DE, for Defendanb-Appellee.

Before: McKEE, Chief Circuit Judge, FUENTES, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

McKEE, Chief Judge.

Jeffrey J. Prosser has appealed an order of the district court affirming an order of the bankruptcy court that denied reconsideration of an earlier order converting Prosser’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding, 11 U.S.C. § 1101*et seq.,*to a proceeding under Chapter 7, 11 U.S.C. § 701*et seq.*

Inasmuch as the background facts leading to the conversion are recited in the district court’s Memorandum Opinion, we find it unnecessary to recite those facts here. *See In re Prosser,*2008 WL 2369187 (D.Vi. June 6, 2008). A bankruptcy court can convert a Chapter 11 proceeding to a proceeding under Chapter 7 for “cause.” 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b). Section 1112(b)(4)(A)-(P) provides a list of factors that constitute “cause” for such a conversion. Certain of Prosser’s creditors filed motions to convert Prosser’s Chapter 11 proceeding to one under Chapter 7, and the bankruptcy court granted the motions after finding cause as set forth under the Bankruptcy Code. Thereafter the bankruptcy court denied Prosser’s motion to reconsider that conversion and the district court subsequently affirmed the bankruptcy court’s decision. This appeal followed.

“The bankruptcy court has broad discretion in deciding whether to ... convert a *100chapter 11 case.” *Loop Corp. v. United States Trustee,*379 F.3d 511, 515 (8th Cir.2004). After a full review of the record, the district court filed a Memorandum Opinion in which it carefully and fully explained its reasons for holding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in converting Prosser’s Chapter 11 proceeding to a Chapter 7 proceedings. We can add little to the district court’s analysis and discussion. Accordingly, we will affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s Memorandum Opinion without further elaboration.
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 21

- 30627 Summary Calendar

United States of America,
Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus
Nathaniel W. Turner,
Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:19

- CR

- 76

- 1

Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *

Nathaniel W. Turner was found guilty by a jury of drug and firearm offenses . He was sentenced to a total of 200 months of imprisonment, followed by five years of supervised release. On appeal, he argues that the district court erred in admitting jail call recordings into evi dence because they

* Pursuant to 5th C ir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 1, 2022 Ly le W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-30627 Document: 00516530373 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/01/2022No. 21

- 30627

2 were improperly authenticated and that the district court erred in applying a sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(1)(A) because the Government failed to prove that he possessed two of the firearms attributed to him

. Althoug h it is questionable whether Turner preserved his evidentiary challenge for appeal, i t is not necessary to decide the standard of review , as the district court did not err in admitting the jail call recordings

. See United States v. Rodriguez , 523 F.3d 519, 525 (5th Cir. 2008) ; United States v. Biggins , 551 F.2d 64, 66 (5th Cir. 1977)

. The testimony regarding the recording and retrieval of the calls as well as the identification of Turner as a participant on the calls supports the district court’s finding that the recordings were sufficiently authenticated

. See United States v. Buchanan , 70 F.3d 818, 827 (5th Cir. 1995) ; see also United States v . Johnson , 943 F.3d 214, 220

- 21 (5th Cir. 2019) ; Biggins , 551 F.2d at 66

. Turner’s arguments regarding authentication implicate only the weight of the evidence and not its admissibility. See United States v. Isiwele , 635 F.3d 196, 200 (5th Cir. 2011)

. Next , the district court did not clearly err in determining that Turner possessed the HK P30 pistol and the Ruger P95 pistol because the record, including the unrebutted facts in the presentence report, s upport s the plausible inference that Turner constructively possessed them both

. See United States v. Alcantar , 733 F.3d 143, 146 (5th Cir. 2013) ; United States v. Houston , 364 F.3d 243, 248 (5th Cir. 2004) ; United States v. Parker , 133 F.3d 322, 329 (5th Cir. 1998)

. AFFIRMED

. Case: 21-30627 Document: 00516530373 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/01/2022
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form
      10-QSB/A for the period ending January 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada, Corporate
      Controller and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C, ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002,





1)  the
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  the
      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By
/s/
      Antonio Estrada


Antonio
      Estrada


Corporate
      Controller and


Principal
      Financial Officer


April
      14,
      2006
Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




Iconix
      Brand Group, Inc.


New
      York,
      New York





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (Nos. 333-96985,  333-116716, 333-120581, 333-128425,
      333-129075, 333-137383 and 333-139575) on Form S-4 (No. 333-135496) and on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos.333-27655,  333-49178, 333-68906,  333-75658, 333-127416 and 333-138134)
      of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 14, 2007, relating to the consolidated
      financial statements,
      financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of Iconix Brand Group,
      Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form
      10-K.





/s/
                BDO Seidman, LLPNew
                York, New YorkMarch
                14, 2007
#### Peter O. ODIGHIZUWA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer S. STROUTH, Defendant-Appellee, and Officer J. Powers; Gary Bass, Defendants.

No. 07-7089.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 19, 2007.

Decided: Jan. 10, 2008.

Peter 0. Odighizuwa, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Peter O. Odighizuwa appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. *Odighizuwa v. Strouth,*No. 7:06-cv-00720-mfu, 2007 WL 1170640 (WD.Va. Apr. 17, 2007 & 2007 WL 2007337, July 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 The case was decided by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
exv10w32we







Exhibit 10.32E




AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATION




between



THE BOEING COMPANY



and



American Airlines, Inc.



Exhibit A1 to Purchase Agreement Number PA-1980



			
	AAL-PA-1980-EXA1
	 	Page 1






BOEING PROPRIETARY







 









 








Exhibit A1




AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATION



Dated ___________________



relating to



BOEING MODEL 777-323ER AIRCRAFT



     [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST
FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].



			
	AAL-PA-1980-EXA1
	 	Page 2






BOEING PROPRIETARY







 









 








Optional Features will be added after the Aircraft is configured.




			
	AAL-PA-1980-EXA1
	 	Page 3






BOEING PROPRIETARY
exv10w77






Exhibit 10.77




December 3, 2010




Dr. Judith Rodin

President

The Rockefeller Foundation

420 Fifth Avenue

New York NY 10018




Dear Judith:



          This will confirm the following agreement relating to the deferral of your director’s
retainers and fees for 2011.


          1. All director’s fees and retainer (“Fees”) payable to you in connection with your service on
the boards of directors (including committees of such boards) of AMR Corporation and American
Airlines, Inc. for the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011, will be deferred and paid
to you in accordance with this letter agreement.


          2. Pursuant to the Procedures for Deferral of Board Retainers and Fees, as amended and
restated (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A), interest will be accrued on the amounts to be
paid on a deferred basis pursuant to paragraph 1 above, from the date such fees would otherwise
have been paid to the date actually paid, at the prime rate which JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. from
time to time charges in New York for 90-day loans to responsible commercial borrowers, such
interest to be compounded monthly.


          3. On the 30th business day after the date when you cease to be a Director of AMR
Corporation, and any affiliates, and cease rendering services, the total amount to be paid on a
deferred basis plus the aggregate amount of interest accrued thereon will be paid to you in a lump
sum distribution. Payment cannot be accelerated.


          4. In the event of your death, the amounts outlined in Paragraph 3 above shall be paid to the
Trustees under your Revocable Agreement of Trust, dated September 15, 1997, as amended February 20,
2004, Judith Rodin Settlor and Trustee. The payments contemplated by this paragraph 4 will be made
on the 30th business day following the date of your death.



 









 







          If the foregoing is satisfactory to you, please indicate by signing one of the originals (two
are enclosed) and returning it to me.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,

 	 
	 	/s/ Kenneth W. Wimberly
 	 
	 	Kenneth W. Wimberly 	 
	 	Corporate Secretary 	 
	 



	 	 	 

	Accepted and agreed:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ Judith Rodin
 

Judith Rodin

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	12/13/10
 

Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,119,153
<SECURITIES>                                   536,667
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                    63,782
<INVENTORY>                                    585,407
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               676,753
<PP&E>                                         486,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                 305,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,950,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,698,242
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         11
<COMMON>                                         1,749
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,569,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,950,189
<SALES>                                      2,451,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,451,531
<CGS>                                        1,911,676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,911,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,834,124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             366,609
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,440,666)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,534
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                385,609
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,058,591)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated March 22, 2000 included in this Form 10-K, into American Biogenetic
Sciences, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos.
33-35992, 33-39683, 33-51240, 33-65416, 333-09473, 333-59351 and 333-93071), and
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-13615,
333-13619, 333-13623, 333- 14447, 333-59345, 333-60117 and 333-69735).



                                                      /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Melville, New York
March 29, 2000