alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,448,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,969,361
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,975,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,056,471
<PP&E>                                       1,569,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,786,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,058,226
<BONDS>                                      2,438,929
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,209
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,718,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,786,332
<SALES>                                     12,680,986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,680,986
<CGS>                                       11,510,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,578,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               111,274
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             190,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,702,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,702,802)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,702,802)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Isabelle KAGLE, Plaintiff, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant.

Civ. No. 30275.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

June 29, 1956.

*198Howard Metzenbaum, Robert R. Dis-bro, Elmer I. Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Geo. H. P. Lacey, Charles F. Clarke, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

JONES, Chief Judge.

The defendant objects to the taxing as costs the expense of taking depositions. No question is raised about the item being a proper one, either in amount or as to its propriety. The defendant’s objections is that when the case was marked settled at defendant’s costs it was not within the defendant’s understanding that deposition costs would be included. The plaintiff denies that there was any understanding with reference to the items of costs.

The court is unable to resolve the conflicting statements of counsel as to any understanding respecting costs. The stipulation provides for the dismissal at defendant’s costs and this must be the only reasonable guide to decision of the question. The depositions were proper items of taxable costs and the plaintiff has supported this by a proper bill of costs under affidavit. The objections therefore will be denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

JAMES A. DELLINGER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE

No. E2005-01485-SC-R11-PD

ORDER - Filed January 22, 2009

On August 13, 2008, James A. Dellinger, the petitioner, filed a Motion for Disclosure of

Evidence Favorable to the Appellant Pursuant to Brady v. Maryland and the Federal and State

Constitutions Regarding State Witness Charles Harlan. The State filed a response to the motion on

August 22, 2008. This Court denied Dellinger’s motion in an order dated August 26, 2008. 

On August 29, 2008, Dellinger filed a Motion to Reconsider, to Permit Oral Argument on

this Motion, and to Strike the State’s Response to Petitioner’s Motion for Disclosure of Evidence

(“Motion to Reconsider”) as well as a Motion That Court Take Judicial Notice. The State filed a

response to both motions on September 12, 2008. On November 3, 2008, Dellinger filed a Reply

to State’s Response to Petitioner’s Motion to Reconsider Motion for Disclosure of Evidence, Motion

to Strike State’s Response, and Motion to Take Judicial Notice.

We conclude that Dellinger has not shown grounds for reconsideration or for any other relief

requested in his Motion to Reconsider. As we stated in the original order of August 26, 2008,

“[Dellinger] forfeited the issues raised in his motion by failing to raise them in the courts below.”

Nor has Dellinger shown grounds to support his Motion That Court Take Judicial Notice. The

information at issue became available to Dellinger on May 4, 2005. The post-conviction trial court

entered its “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law” on June 2, 2005. Dellinger offers no

explanation for his failure to request permission to supplement the record by submitting the

information to the post-conviction trial court while those proceedings were pending or for his

three-year delay in requesting permission to supplement the record on appeal.

Accordingly, Dellinger’s Motion to Reconsider and Motion That Court Take Judicial Notice

are denied.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>   1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings                        Exhibit 11


The Caldor Corporation and Subsidiaries
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Year Ended          Year Ended            Year Ended
                                                                    February 1,          February 3,          January 28,
                                                                       1997                 1996                1995
                                                                    -----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                 <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Net Earnings (Loss)                                                 $   (185,325)       $   (301,028)       $     44,359
                                                                    ============        ============        ============


Weighted average number of common shares
         outstanding                                                  16,994,234          16,902,339          16,582,781
Common equivalent shares:
                  Shares issued upon exercise of warrants (1)                                                     89,091
                  Shares issued upon exercise of outstanding
                           stock options(1)                                                   15,604              81,164
                                                                    ------------        ------------        ------------
Weighted average number of common and common
         equivalent shares outstanding                                16,994,234          16,917,943          16,753,036
                                                                    ============        ============        ============
Net earnings (loss) per share (primary and fully-
         diluted)                                                   $     (10.91)       $     (17.79)       $       2.65
                                                                    ============        ============        ============
</TABLE>

-------------------------------

(1) Calculated using the treasury stock method
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
SULLIVAN COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
TWELVE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                              0000856710
<NAME>                                             SULLIVAN COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1,000
<CURRENCY>                                         U.S.  DOLLARS
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                             0
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      56,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                       5,879
<INVENTORY>                                        9,711
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   70,077
<PP&E>                                             238,167
<DEPRECIATION>                                     71,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     333,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              78,675
<BONDS>                                            185,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           1
<OTHER-SE>                                         (76,319)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       333,975
<SALES>                                            524,551
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   524,551
<CGS>                                              459,880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      459,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   4,847
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 36,289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (26,005)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       2,591
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (28,596)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     3,107
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (31,703)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


                       LOAN AMENDMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR VALUE RECEIVED AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS CONTAINED
HEREIN, Profile Technologies, Inc. (Company), a Delaware corporation and Murphy
Evans (Lender), an individual, 204 E. Railroad ST., Laurinburg, NC, agree as
follows:

(1)  Scope. From and after January 1, 2003, all past and future loans requested
     by Company and made by Lender to the Company shall be subject to the terms
     of this Amendment and Note.
(2)  Interest. Interest on the principal sum of all past and future advances
     made by Lender shall accrue at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum.
     Accrued interest shall be paid on June 30 and December 31 of each year.
(3)  Final Maturity Date and Repayment Date. Unless sooner paid, the outstanding
     principal balance of all loans plus all accrued and unpaid interest shall
     be due and payable on December 31, 2003; provided, however, that Lender
     shall have the option to convert all or part of such amounts owed into any
     debt or equity offering being made from time to time by Company. As of
     March 6, 2003, the principal amount that Lender has loaned to Company is
     $324,150.
(4)  Early Repayment. Company may repay all or part of the principal amounts due
     at any time without penalty of any kind.
(5)  Superceded Agreements. This Amendment and Loan agreement supercedes the
     interest and payment terms of that certain agreement between the parties
     dated May 9, 2002, and the terms of all other advances, both written and
     verbal, previously made by Lender to the Company.
(6)  Governing Law. This Amendment and Note agreement shall be governed by the
     laws of the state of North Carolina.

     In Witness  Whereof,  the parties have caused this agreement to be executed
     effective as of March 6, 2003.


     BY: ______________________              BY: ________________________
     Henry Gemino                            Murphy Evans
     Chief Executive Officer
     Profile Technologies, Inc.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 23, 2021

No. 04-20-00333-CR

Zohair AHMED,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR2128A

The Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Court-appointed counsel for appellant has filed a brief stating there are no meritorious 

issues to raise on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). However, the 

brief does not meet all of the Anders requirements. An Anders brief must include a (1) motion to 

withdraw as counsel, and (2) a certificate stating counsel has served copies of the brief and 

motion on appellant, informed appellant of his right to review the record and file his own brief, 

and explained to appellant the procedure for obtaining the record. See Nichols v. State, 954 

S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 

(Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.); see also Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2014). 

It is therefore ORDERED that the appellant’s brief is STRICKEN and counsel is 

instructed to file an appellant’s brief in compliance with the Anders requirements set forth in this 

order. The appellant’s brief must be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of August, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Letter regarding temporary living benefits for Andrew M. Miller



 Exhibit 10.52 

 

 

 February 15, 2011 

Mr. Andrew Miller 
 President & Chief
Executive Officer 
 Polycom, Inc. 

4750 Willow Road 
 Pleasanton, CA 94588

 Dear Andy: 
 The purpose of this
letter is to memorialize the extension of your temporary living benefits for an additional four month period through August 2011 and the provision of storage expenses for four additional months in an amount up to $480 per month, as approved by the
Compensation Committee in connection with your relocation to California. As set forth in your original offer letter dated June 5, 2009, all relocation expenses are to be provided to you on a grossed up basis and are subject to the following
remaining repayment schedule should you voluntarily terminate your employment with Polycom: 50% of the total relocation expense if you voluntarily terminate your employment prior to the two-year anniversary of your employment with Polycom (i.e. July
1, 2011), and no repayment obligation if you voluntarily terminate your employment on or after July 1, 2011. 
 Please do not hesitate to
contact me if you have any questions. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/    ASHLEY D.
GOLDSMITH        
	Ashley D. Goldsmith
	Executive Vice President, Human Resources
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2618 

To enhance certain prohibitions and penalties relating to certain forms of 

firearms trafficking. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2011 

Mr. QUIGLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To enhance certain prohibitions and penalties relating to 

certain forms of firearms trafficking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Border Security En5 hancement Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM PENALTY FOR CERTAIN IN7 TENTIONALLY FALSE STATEMENTS RELAT8 ING TO FIREARMS. 

9 Section 924(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 

10 amended— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2618 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph 

2 (A) and redesignating subparagraphs (B) through 

3 (D) as subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively; 

4 and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(8) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, 

7 subsection (b), (c), (f), or (p) of this section, or in section 

8 929, whoever knowingly makes any false statement or rep9 resentation with respect to the information required by 

10 this chapter to be kept in the records of a person licensed 

11 under this chapter or in applying for any license or exemp12 tion or relief from disability under this chapter shall be 

13 fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, 

14 or both.’’. 

15 SEC. 3. CERTAIN FIREARMS-RELATED OFFENSES CONSID16 ERED TO BE SPECIFIED UNLAWFUL ACTIV17 ITY. 

18 Section 1956(c)(7)(D) of title 18, United States 

19 Code, is amended by inserting after ‘‘section 922(1) (relat20 ing to the unlawful importation of firearms),’’ the fol21 lowing: ‘‘section 924(a)(1)(A) (relating to misrepresenta22 tions relating to firearms),’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Javier CORTEZ, also known as Raul Cortez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-41227.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 24, 2008.

Erin Blythe Martin, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*619Donald Lee Bailey, Sherman, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Javier Cortez is charged with being an unlawful user of a controlled substance in knowing possession of a firearm, making a false written statement to a licensed firearms dealer, and receiving a firearm with an altered or obliterated serial number. Cortez appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion to reconsider the magistrate judge’s pretrial detention order.

The district court’s decision rests upon its conclusion that Cortez has failed to establish that any condition or combination of conditions will reasonably ensure the safety of the community if Cortez is released. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) & (f). Absent an error of law, this court will uphold a district court’s pretrial detention order if it is supported by the proceedings below. *United States v. Rueben,*974 F.2d 580, 585 (5th Cir.1992). The same standard of review applies to the denial of a motion to reconsider a detention order. *United States v. Hare,*873 F.2d 796, 798 (5th Cir.1989).

Analysis of the factors set forth in § 3142(g) indicates that the district court’s conclusions are supported by the proceedings below. *See Rueben,*974 F.2d at 586. The pretrial detention order is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Amendment to the Ellie Mae, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.25 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 ELLIE MAE, INC. 2009 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

 Pursuant to the terms of the Ellie Mae, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended (the
“Plan”), the Board of Directors of Ellie Mae, Inc. (the “Company”), approved this amendment on August 26, 2010, and this amendment was approved by the Company’s stockholders on September 16, 2010:

 1. Section 3 of the Plan shall be amended in to read in its entirety as follows: 

“3. Stock Subject to this Plan. Subject to the adjustment provisions of Section 13 of this Plan, the maximum aggregate
number of Shares under this Plan is 2,658,348 plus up to 10,493,424 Shares covered by awards outstanding under the Prior Plan on the date of adoption of this Plan that may become available under this Plan pursuant to the last two
sentences of this Section 3. The maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under this Plan pursuant to Incentive Stock Options is 13,151,772. The Shares may be authorized but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock, or both. If
an Option or Stock Purchase Right (whether granted under this Plan or the Prior Plan) should expire, terminate, be cancelled or become unexercisable for any reason without having been exercised in full, then the unpurchased Shares that were subject
thereto shall, unless this Plan shall have been terminated, become available for future grant or sale under this Plan. In addition, Shares issued under this Plan or the Prior Plan and later forfeited, repurchased or otherwise reacquired by the
Company shall, unless this Plan shall have been terminated, become available for future grant or sale under this Plan.” 

2. Except as specifically provided for in this amendment, the terms of the Plan shall be unmodified and shall remain in full force and
effect. 
 The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Company effective as of August 26, 2010 and was approved by the stockholders of the Company on September 16, 2010. 

Executed on September 16, 2010. 
  


			
	ELLIE MAE, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Sigmund Anderman

	 Title: President and Chief Executive Officer