alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20477]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM15-13-001]


Notice of Filing; Revisions to the Definition of Remedial Action 
Scheme and Related Reliability Standards

    Take notice that on September 15, 2017, the North American Electric 
Reliability Corporation submitted an errata to the Implementation Plan 
for Revised Definition of ``Remedial Action Scheme'' pursuant to Order 
No. 818.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Order No. 818, Revisions to Emergency Operations Reliability 
Standards; Revisions to Undervoltage Load Shedding Reliability 
Standards; Revisions to the Definition of ``Remedial Action Scheme'' 
and Related Reliability Standards, Docket Nos. RM15-7-000 et al., 
(2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
    For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bafcffe8f9f5d4d6d3d4dfe9cfcacad5c8cefadcdfc8d994ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abedeef9e8e4c5c7c2c5cef8dedbdbc4d9dfebcdced9c885ccc4dd">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on October 10, 2017.

    Dated: September 19, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-20477 Filed 9-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2739 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2739

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
             increased deduction for start-up expenditures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2011

   Mr. Connolly of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
             increased deduction for start-up expenditures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Jump Start American Small Business 
Innovation Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF INCREASED DEDUCTION FOR START-UP EXPENDITURES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 195(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) in the text by striking ``2010'' and inserting ``2010 
        or 2011'', and
            (2) in the heading by striking ``2010'' and inserting 
        ``2010 or 2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to amounts paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 
31, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21.1   LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>

                                                                                NAME(S) UNDER WHICH SUBSIDIARY
                       SUBSIDIARY                   STATE / JURISDICTION            IS CONDUCTING BUSINESS
                       ----------                   --------------------            ----------------------

     <S>                                            <C>                    <C>
      Worldport Ireland Limited                     Ireland                Worldport Ireland Limited; Worldport
                                                                           Ireland; Worldport
      Worldport Europe Limited                      Ireland                n/a
      VIS-able International AB                     Sweden                 VIS-able International AB; VIS-able AB
      VIS-able AB                                   Sweden                 VIS-able AB; VIS-able
      Ballou Internet Services AB                   Sweden                 Ballou Internet Services AB; Ballou
      Vasteras AB                                   Sweden                 n/a
      Aros IT Konsutter AB                          Sweden                 n/a
      VIS-able America, Inc.                        Delaware               VIS-able America, Inc.
      Ballou Internet Services, Inc.                Delaware               Ballou Internet Services, Inc.
      VIS-able UK, Inc.                             United Kingdom         VIS-able UK, Inc.; Ballou UK
      Telenational Communications, Inc.             Delaware               Telenational Communications, Inc.; TNC;
                                                                           TCI; Telenational
      Worldport International, Inc.                 Delaware               n/a
      Worldport Acquisitions, Inc.                  Delaware               n/a
      Worldport Acquisitions, Corp.                 Delaware               n/a
      Worldport / ICX, Inc.                         Delaware               n/a
      Worldport Distributions NV                    Netherlands            n/a
      Worldport Communications (Europe) BV          Netherlands            n/a



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Jacobs  Financial  Group,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended May 31, 2006 (the "Report")
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,  I, John M. Jacobs, President
and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Company's  Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



         September 13, 2006                         /s/ John M. Jacobs
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    John M. Jacobs
                                                    President and CEO
CELL TECH INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cell Tech International
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Form 10-Q"), I, Marta C. Carpenter, Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                     /s/ Marta C. Carpenter
                                                     ----------------------

                                                     Marta C. Carpenter
                                                     Chief Accounting Officer

                                                     DATED: November 19, 2003

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required  by  Section  906,  has  been  provided  to  Cell  Tech   International
Incorporated  and will be retained by Cell Tech  International  Incorporated and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       26
exv10w3






Exhibit 10.3





Holly Energy Partners, L.P.




Change in Control Agreement Policy



     This Change in Control Agreement Policy reflects the terms and procedures as approved at the
February 14, 2011 meetings of the Board of Directors (“Board”) of Holly Logistic Services, L.L.C.
(“HLS”) based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board.



     1. Eligibility



     Employees of HLS at pay grades 34 and above and who are full-time employees will receive
Change in Control Agreements (“CIC Agreements”) either upon hire or promotion to an eligible pay
grade level at the benefit level described in Section 2 below. However, no eligible individual
will be entitled to the benefits described in Section 2 below unless or until the individual timely
executes a CIC Agreement in accordance with the procedures established by the Chief Executive
Officer of HLS.



     2. Severance Benefits under CIC Agreements



     The CIC Agreements shall contain the terms set forth in the form agreement attached hereto as
Exhibit A.



          The applicable multiplier and number of years that medical and dental benefits will be
continued will be determined based on the executive’s pay grade classification in accordance with
the following chart:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Years of Medical and
	 	 	Lump Sum Multiplier	 	Dental Continuation
	Grades 34 and 35
	 	 	1 X	 	 	1 Year
	Grades 36 and 37
	 	 	2 X	 	 	2 Years
	Grade 38 and Above
	 	 	3 X	 	 	3 Years






     3. Term of CIC Agreements



     The initial term
of each and every CIC Agreement ends on January 31, 2014, regardless of the
date on which an executive enters into a CIC Agreement with Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”). On January 31, 2014 (and on each
subsequent January 31) the term of the CIC Agreements will be automatically extended for one
additional year, unless the Partnership gives notice to each
executive 60 days prior to the automatic extension date. For example, if an eligible executive is
hired on and enters into a CIC Agreement on March 1, 2011, the initial term of his CIC Agreement
will last until January 31, 2014, and if the Partnership does not give a notice of non-extension by
December 2, 2013, then the term of the CIC Agreements will be automatically extended to January 31,
2015 on January 31, 2014. The occurrence of a “Change in Control” will extend or reduce the term
of the CIC Agreements through the end of the “Protection Period.”
| **POWER                OF ATTORNEY**                                                   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                   |
| **AEP                GENERATING COMPANY**                                              |
| **Annual                Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year                Ended** |
| **December                31,                2005**                                    |

|                                 |                                |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| /s/                John B. Keane     | /s/                Stephen P. Smith |
|                                 |                                |
|                                 |                                |
| /s/                Michael G. Morris | /s/                Susan Tomasky    |
|                                 |                                |
|                                 |                                |
| /s/                Robert P. Powers  |                                |
|                                 |                                |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ramiro MOLINA, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 84-2547.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 8, 1985.

*1133Glenn L. Archer, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Div., Michael L. Paup, Chief, Appellate Section, Tax Div., William S. Estabrook, Michael J. Roach, Attys., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., James R. Gough, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

T.A. Zalenski, Pittsburg, Pa., for defendants-appellees.

Ramiro Molina, pro se.

Before REAVLEY, JOHNSON and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

In this suit by the United States to foreclose its tax lien against the homestead of Ramiro and Anita B. Molina, the United States was awarded a judgment of $163,-778.39. The district court ordered foreclosure and sale of the homestead but Anita Molina, who was not separately liable for the taxes, was awarded 36.669 percent of the proceeds from the sale of the property as compensation for her homestead interest, 584 F.Supp. 1011. The United States appeals, claiming that the district court overvalued her homestead interest in the property. Agreeing with the United States, we reverse the portion of the district court’s judgment dealing with the valuation of Anita’s homestead interest and remand the case for reconsideration in light of our recent opinion in *Harris v. United States,*764 F.2d 1126 (5th Cir.1985).

Molina Drilling Company, a partnership owned jointly by Ramiro Molina and his brother, Ruben, failed to remit employment taxes due with respect to the wages of its employees during the third and fourth quarters of 1976, the first and second quarters of 1977, and the fourth quarter of 1978. Assessments by the Internal Revenue Service against Molina Drilling, including penalties and interest, totaled $163,-778.39 on July 30, 1984.

The property foreclosed upon, a 267 acre tract owned in undivided one-half interests by Ramiro and Ruben Molina and their wives, was the homestead of Ramiro and Anita Molina. Accordingly, only the homestead interest of Anita Molina was compensable under *United States v. Rodgers,*461 U.S. 677, 103 S.Ct. 2132, 76 L.Ed.2d 236 (1983). In valuing Anita’s interest, the district court ordered the United States to consider Ramiro’s and Anita’s undivided one-half interest as though it were owned only by Anita. As we explained in *Harris,*764 F.2d at 1130, a homestead estate owned by a husband and wife must be valued using tables which account for the fact that the property is subject to concurrent use by two people. The district court here incorrectly read *Rodgers*to suggest that a jointly owned estate should be valued without consideration of the fact that the estate is owned by more than one person. The judgment of the district court is therefore reversed and the case is remanded so that Anita Molina’s homestead interest can be valued correctly.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 12.2  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Enrico Cavatorta, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Luxottica Group S.p.A.;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  By:
/s/ ENRICO CAVATORTAEnrico CavatortaChief Financial OfficerDated: April 28, 2011
EX-34.11
(logo) Grant Thornton

Audit * Tax * Advisory

Grant Thornton LLP
201 South College Street
Suite 2500
Charlotte, NC 28244

T 704.632.3500

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Board of Directors

Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria ("Management's Report"), that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. (the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2013, except for those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A)
within Exhibit A. The transactions covered by this report are only those
transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust, senior trust or
operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the "Platform").
Reference Exhibit B for the transactions covered by this examination. Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the
Platform based on our examination.


Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.


1


(page)


In our opinion, management's assertion that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.
complied with the applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit A and
Exhibit B as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 for the Platform is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


Charlotte, North Carolina

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

March 1, 2014


2