alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CIRCUIT COURT OF RUSSELL COUNTY

#### Joyce Diane McReynolds, Administratrix of the Estate of Marjorie Lee Townsend, deceased v. Altamont Manor, Inc., etc.

April 12, 2005

Case No. CL03-94

By Judge Michael L. Moore

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s Motion to Require Election, requesting that the plaintiff be ordered to elect between her wrongful death and survival actions. Plaintiff filed a wrongful death action on April 3, 2003, alleging that the decedent died as a result of the defendant’s negligence. Subsequently, the plaintiff also filed a personal injury survival action on January 29, 2004, alleging facts and negligence similar to the wrongful death suit. The defendant argues that the plaintiff should be required to elect between the survival action and the wrongful death action. The Court has previously ruled that these two suits are to be consolidated for trial.

The Virginia Supreme Court has held that a plaintiff “may not recover for the same injury under the survival statute and wrongful death statute.” *Hendrix*v. *Daugherty,*249 Va. 540, 547, 457 S.E.2d 71 (1995). While a plaintiff may recover under only one theory, under § 8.01-281 of the Code of Virginia, he or she may plead alternative theories of recovery provided that such claims arise out of the same transaction or occurrence.

*420The purpose of allowing a plaintiff to plead alternative theories as to allow the fact finder to decide which, if either, theory of recovery has been proven. Whether the defendant’s alleged negligence caused a personal injury or a wrongful death is a jury question, and the Court will not require the plaintiff to choose one theory over another. While the plaintiff may only recover on one theory, she may argue alternative theories of liability; therefore, defendant’s Motion to Require Election is denied.
Exhibit 15.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.333-190123, 333-171011, 333-147724, 333-14006 and 333-9546) of Luxottica Group S.p.A. of our report dated April 24, 2015, relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Luxottica Group S.p.A, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers S.p.A.  Milan, Italy April 24, 2015
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

#### John T. White, III v. Southland Corp.

May 18, 1983

Case No. (Law) 8131

By JUDGE ALBERT H. GRENADIER

The defendant has filed a plea in bar alleging that the motion for judgment is barred by the statute of limitations. The plaintiff alleges in his motion for judgment that on January 16, 1981, he was injured when he slipped and fell on the defendant’s premises.

This claim was originally filed in the Alexandria General District Court on December 6, 1982, within the statutory period. On March 28, 1983, the plaintiff took a voluntary nonsuit in that Court. On April 1, 1983 the plaintiff refiled his action . in this Court asking for damages in the sum of $50,000.00. The defendant argues that the tolling provisions under Section 8.01-229 of the Code of Virginia are not effective because the plaintiff did not refile his new suit in the General District Court.

Section 8.01-380(A) of the Code of Virginia provides that no new proceeding on the same cause of action or against the same party shall be had in any court other than that in which the nonsuit is taken, unless that court is without jurisdiction, or not a proper venue, or other good cause be shown for proceeding in another court.

*98The Court is of the opinion that by virtue of the increased *ad damnum*the General District Court is without jurisdiction and the limitation prescribed by § 8.01-380(A) of the Code of Virginia is not applicable. As the plaintiff is entitled to the tolling provisions of § 8.01-229 of the Code of Virginia, this suit was filed within the statutory period. Accordingly, the plea of the statute of limitations will be overruled.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1







              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on 
Form S-3 No. 333-19695 and 333-7861 and Form S-8 No. 33-61704, 33-61708, and 
33-68046 pertaining to the Protein Polymer Technologies, Inc. 1992 Stock Option 
Plan, 1989 Stock Option Plan, and Options Subject to Individual Option 
Agreements of our report dated January 30, 1997, with respect to the financial 
statements of Protein Polymer Technologies, Inc., included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1996.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP




San Diego, California
March 20, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,504
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,523
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          26,007
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            25,606
<LOANS>                                        250,490
<ALLOWANCE>                                        857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 292,241
<DEPOSITS>                                     221,533
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,501
<LONG-TERM>                                     46,376
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 292,241
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,911
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,004
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   199
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   199
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,696
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,418
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      253
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   9
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,809
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,181
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.22
<LOANS-NON>                                        605
<LOANS-PAST>                                       318
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   654
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       50
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  857
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               105
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            752
        

</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2753 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

to provide Internet access to Regional Fishery Management Council 

meetings and meeting records, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2011 

Mr. JONES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act to provide Internet access to Regional 

Fishery Management Council meetings and meeting 

records, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fishery Management 

5 Transparency and Accountability Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2753 IH

1 SEC. 2. INTERNET ACCESS TO REGIONAL FISHERY MAN2 AGEMENT COUNCIL MEETINGS AND MEETING 

3 RECORDS. 

4 Section 302(i)(2) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

5 Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852(i)(2)) 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(G) Each Council shall make available on the 

8 Internet website of the Council— 

9 ‘‘(i) a live broadcast of each meeting of the 

10 Council, of the science and statistical committee 

11 of the Council, and of the Council coordination 

12 committee established under subsection (l), that 

13 is not closed in accordance with paragraph (3); 

14 and 

15 ‘‘(ii) complete audio, complete video if the 

16 meeting was in person or by video conference, 

17 and a complete transcript of each such meet18 ing— 

19 ‘‘(I) by not later than 30 days after 

20 the conclusion of the meeting; and 

21 ‘‘(II) for 3 years after the conclusion 

22 of the meeting.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                          76,622
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    358,746
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               844,051
<PP&E>                                         169,450
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,990,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,133,052
<BONDS>                                        541,141
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,355
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,911,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,990,486
<SALES>                                          1,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,935
<CGS>                                            2,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               257,199
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (432,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (432,329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (432,329)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
Letter Agreement Amendment regarding the Research and Commercial License Option



 Exhibit 10.50 
 NOTE: Portions of this Exhibit are the subject of a Confidential Treatment Request by the Registrant to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). Such portions have been
redacted and are marked with a “[***]” in the place of the redacted language. The redacted information has been filed separately with the Commission. 
 December 3, 2010 
 Edward Lanphier 
 President and Chief Executive Officer 
 Sangamo BioSciences, Inc. 

501 Canal Blvd, Suite A100 
 Richmond, CA 94804

 Re: RESEARCH AND COMMERCIAL LICENSE OPTION AGREEMENT MANUFACTURE AND SUPPLY OF ZFP PRODUCTS 2011 

Dear Edward: 
 This will confirm the structured
pricing platform for supply of ZFP Products by Sangamo BioSciences, Inc. (“Sangamo”) to Dow AgroSciences LLC (“DAS”) in 2011. This letter amends that certain Research and Commercial License Option Agreement between DAS and
Sangamo, dated as of October 1, 2005, as amended (the “Agreement”). Any capitalized terms used in this letter but not defined herein shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Agreement. 

For supply of ZFP Products in 2011 DAS will pay Sangamo $[***] in four equal installments of $[***] due on
January 1, April 1, July 1 and September 1, 2011. Sangamo will send invoices and DAS will pay within thirty (30) days of receiving each invoice. These payments are guaranteed and non-refundable, and entitle DAS (or
Sublicensees authorized by DAS) to order and receive from Sangamo ZFP Products for [***] ([***]) targets in 2011, subject to the limitation that Sangamo will not be required to supply DAS with ZFP Products for more than [***]
([***]) targets in any calendar quarter, nor more than [***] ([***]) targets in any month. Subject to the same limitation, Sangamo will supply ZFP Products for up to [***] ([***]) additional targets per year for
$[***] per target. After reasonable commercial effort in designing ZFPs or ZFNs, Sangamo may declare a target as “unworkable.” Sangamo will notify DAS in a timely manner, will not be reimbursed for its efforts on the unworkable
target, and the unworkable target is not included in the number of targets DAS or its Sublicensees may order from Sangamo. 
  

	***	CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION 








 Sangamo will send invoices and DAS will pay within thirty (30) days of receiving each invoice. After
the initial [***] targets have been ordered, the cost for each additional target will be added to the next quarterly invoice sent after the ZFP Product for that target has been delivered. 
 Please confirm Sangamo’s agreement by signing below and returning a signed copy of this letter. 
 Sincerely, 
  

	
	/S/ Antonio Galindez
	Antonio Galindez
	President and CEO

 Agreed: 

Sangamo BioSciences, Inc. 
  

			
	By:	 	   /S/ H. Ward
Wolff



			
	Name:	 	   H. Ward Wolff



			
	Title:	 	   EVP & CFO



 

	***	CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,138
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                       798
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,079
<PP&E>                                           1,411
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,916
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,029
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           177
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,116)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,267
<SALES>                                          1,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,627
<CGS>                                            1,348
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    10
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     17
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 17
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        17
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             697
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,353
<ALLOWANCES>                                       558
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,323
<PP&E>                                           1,183
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,368
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           177
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,836)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,213
<SALES>                                          2,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,525
<CGS>                                            2,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     35
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 35
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        35
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7524

IRVING D. CHAPPELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; STEVEN

MULLER; MICHAEL EASLEY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Russell A. Eliason, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-98-154-1)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 16, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Irving D. Chappell, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Irving D. Chappell seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Chappell v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-98-154-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1998).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1
WESTERN GAS RESOURCES, INC.
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
DECEMBER 31, 2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             Weighted
                                                                              Average
                                                                             Shares Of                        Earnings
                                                                              Common                          Per Share
                                                                               Stock             Net          Of Common
                                                                            Outstanding        Income           Stock
                                                                            -----------     -------------     ---------
<S>                                                                         <C>             <C>               <C>
Net income...........................................................                       $  56,108,000

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding..................       32,240,755

Less preferred stock dividends:

    $2.28 cumulative preferred stock.................................                          (3,171,000)
    $2.625 cumulative convertible preferred stock....................                          (7,245,000)
                                                                            ----------      -------------

                                                                            32,240,755      $  45,692,000
                                                                            ==========      =============

Basic earnings per share of common stock.............................                                         $      1.42
                                                                                                              ===========

(Assume no conversion of anti-dilutive convertible preferred stock)

Assume exercise of common stock equivalents:

    Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding..............       32,834,641

    (Anti-dilutive common stock equivalents are not used
    in this calculation)

                                                                            32,834,641      $  45,692,000
                                                                            ==========      =============

Fully diluted earnings per share of common stock.....................                                         $      1.39
                                                                                                              ===========
</TABLE>