alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          16,441
<SECURITIES>                                     7,308
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,343
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,224
<PP&E>                                          12,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,031
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,362
<SALES>                                          8,204
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,108
<CGS>                                              418
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,979
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,009)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
#### In re The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, et al., petitioners.

No. 10-245.

Nov. 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
exv10w32wh






Exhibit 10.32H




ESCALATION ADJUSTMENT

AIRFRAME AND OPTIONAL FEATURES

777-323ER




between



THE BOEING COMPANY



and



American Airlines, Inc.



Supplemental Exhibit AE1

to Purchase Agreement Number 1980



			
	 	 	 
	P.A. No. 1980
	 	SA-20
	AE — 1
	 	Page 1






BOEING PROPRIETARY




 









 





ESCALATION ADJUSTMENT

AIRFRAME AND OPTIONAL FEATURES




relating to



BOEING MODEL 777-323ER AIRCRAFT




	1.	 	Formula.




[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]




			
	 	 	 
	P.A. No. 1980
	 	SA-20
	AE — 1
	 	Page 2






BOEING PROPRIETARY




 









 




[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]



Note:





	 	(i)	 	[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT].
	 
	 	(ii)	 	[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT].
	 
	 	(iii)	 	[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT].
	 
	 	(iv)	 	[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT].
	 
	 	(v)	 	[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT]





			
	 	 	 
	P.A. No. 1980
	 	SA-20
	AE — 1
	 	Page 3






BOEING PROPRIETARY




 









 






	 	(vi)	 	[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT]





2. Values to be Utilized in the Event of Unavailability.




     2.1 [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A
REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]



     2.2 [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A
REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].



     2.3 [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A
REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].



     2.4 [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A
REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].


Note:





	 	(i)	 	[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT].





			
	 	 	 
	P.A. No. 1980
	 	SA-20
	AE — 1
	 	Page 4






BOEING PROPRIETARY




 









 






	 	(ii)	 	[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT].





			
	 	 	 
	P.A. No. 1980
	 	SA-20
	AE — 1
	 	Page 5






BOEING PROPRIETARY
_____________ No. 96-2610MN

_____________ Glen Tschida, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * County of Ramsey, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: February 14, 1997 Filed: March 5, 1997

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. GlenTschida appeals the district court's adverse grant of summar y jud gment in this disability-based employment discrimination action . Essent ially, the district court decided that Tschida’s employment wa s terminated before the effective date of the Americans with Disabilities Ac t and that Tschida failed to prove he was qualified for any of the othe r positions for which he applied. Having reviewed the record and th e materi als submitted by the parties, we conclude the district court’ s deci sion is clearly correct. We decline to address the mixed-motiv e argument that Tschida raises for the first time on appeal. Finally, based on Ts chida’s failure to invoke the protection of Federal Rule of Civi l Proced ure 56(f), we reject his contention that the district cour t improperlygranted summary judgment before Tschida had an opportunity to complete discovery. Finding no reversible error, we affirm for the reason s stated in the district court’s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc; (the Company) on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
JeanPierre Dallaire Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 12, 2009



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ JeanPierre Dallaire    
|JeanPierre Dallaire        
|Principal Accounting Officer
#### Martina E. CLARK, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Rural Housing Service, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 08-1087.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 19, 2008.

Decided: June 23, 2008.

Martina E. Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Ann Youngs, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Martina E. Clark appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint in which she sought an injunction to stop a state court foreclosure proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Clark v. United States Dep’t of Agriculture,*No. 3:06-cv-00457-MR-DCK, 2007 WL 3112458 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
##### 



Exhibit 10.11
 THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANY
2004 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
EMPLOYEE RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
 «Name»
 IT IS AGREED
 Grant «date» «_of_shares»
 Vesting and Forfeitures
   Stockholder Rights
 1




---



##### 



Stock Certificates Exhibit A
 No Transfer
 Rule 16b-3
 Other Laws
 Tax Withholding.
 Governing Law
 Binding Effect
 Headings and Sections
 Resolution of Disputes.
 2




---



##### 



Plan and Award Agreement
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANYOfficer«Name»Employee
 3




---



##### 



Exhibit A
 IRREVOCABLE STOCK POWER
 «M_of_shares»
 Signature«Name»Date
 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,524
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,009
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     28,397
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           9,550
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             9,103
<LOANS>                                        134,214
<ALLOWANCE>                                        429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,667
<DEPOSITS>                                     148,314
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,413
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,940
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 185,667
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,492
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  584
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    53
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,129
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,690
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,715
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,414
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    469
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         469
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       210
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.25
<LOANS-NON>                                        153
<LOANS-PAST>                                       153
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   429
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  429
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               210
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            219


</TABLE>
#### James *against*Henry.

*Debt,*not *as-** intuit being eqúivalent, at least, to a specialty»

*THE COURT*said, that a

Justice’s judgment was equivalent, at least, to a specialty; and that *assumpsit*will not, therefore, lie on such a judgment; but the action should be 7 t *(ICOte*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.14
                                   AGREEMENT


This Agreement is made and entered into by The Caldor Corporation ("Caldor")
and SUSAN SPRUNK (Executive").

Caldor agrees to pay to Executive the gross sum of $250,000.00 as a special
bonus.  Executive acknowledges receipt of such bonus.

In consideration for Caldor's payment of a special bonus, Executive agrees to
pay back to Caldor the amount of the bonus (net of taxes) in the event that
Executive's employment is terminated either voluntarily or otherwise for cause
within two years of the date of this agreement. The amount agreed to be paid
back is as follows:

     One hundred percent (100%) of special bonus if employment 
     terminates within one (1) year from date of this agreement.

     Fifty percent (50%) of special bonus if employment terminates
     within two (2) years (but more than one year) from date of this
     agreement.

Executive agrees that, in the event Executive's employment is terminated within
the above designated period and the relevant amount of the bonus is not repaid
to Caldor by Executive, in whole or in part, then Caldor may offset the amount
owed against any payments due to Executive from Caldor, including, without
limitation, salary or bonus. However, such right of offset shall not be the
sole or exclusive means of recovery of repayments owed to Caldor by Executive,
and Caldor, or its assigns shall retain all other rights and remedies which may
be available.

Executive acknowledges that nothing in this Agreement constitutes an agreement
to employ Executive for any specified period of time or otherwise affects
Caldor's right to terminate Executive's employment.

Executive further acknowledges that he/she has carefully read this Agreement,
that he/she understands its terms, and that he/she voluntarily signs his/her
name to it.


/s/ Susan Sprunk                      October 3, 1997
---------------------               -----------------------
Susan Sprunk                        Date

THE CALDOR CORPORATION


By  /s/ Dennis M Lee                  Oct 3, 1997
---------------------               -----------------------
                                    Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ACG
   HOLDINGS, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTH
   PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
   SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000856710
<NAME>                                         ACG Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  62,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,860
<INVENTORY>                                    8,343
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               71,591
<PP&E>                                         263,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                 119,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 299,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          77,042
<BONDS>                                        185,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (119,307)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   299,000
<SALES>                                        520,343
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               520,343
<CGS>                                          439,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  439,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               2,510
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             36,242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,839)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   523
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,362)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,106)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,468)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned
executive officer of First Keystone Financial, Inc. (the Registrant) hereby certify that the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: December 18, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Hugh J. Garchinsky                                              
|                        |  |  |  | Name: Hugh J. Garchinsky Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
First Keystone Financial, Inc. and will be retained by First Keystone Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          18,573
<SECURITIES>                                     3,448
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                       756
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,900
<PP&E>                                           3,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,221
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,241
<SALES>                                         10,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,759
<CGS>                                            1,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,024)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,024)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,024)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1962

PERCY LEE CLAY; DIANE CLAY,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

C T CORPORATION SYSTEM, d/b/a Citimortgage, Inc.; 

CITIMORTGAGE, INC.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00925-WO-PTS)

Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Percy Lee Clay, Diane Clay, Appellants Pro Se. Joseph Samuel 

Dowdy, Pamela Wachter McAfee, Meghan E. B. Pridemore, NELSON 

MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Percy Lee Clay and Diane Clay appeal the district 

court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of 

CitiMortgage, Inc., on their claims for breach of contract, 

conversion, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Clay v. C T Corporation, No. 1:08-cv-00925-WO-PTS 

(M.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2011). We deny the Clays’ motions to recuse 

and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED