alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Deferred Executive Compensation Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.25 
 THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY 
 DEFERRED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

 AMENDMENT No. 3 
 THIS INSTRUMENT made as of the 7th day of December, 2010 by the ERISA Management Committee (the “Committee”) of The New York Times Company (the “Company”), 

W  I  T  N  E  S  S 
 E  T  H: 
 WHEREAS, the Company maintains, for the benefit of eligible employees,
The New York Times Company Deferred Executive Compensation Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Plan, the Company has the right to amend the Plan by an action of the Committee; and

 WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan, effective November 30, 2010, to provide that: (i) with respect to
Elective Deferrals made for Plan Year 2005 and thereafter, elections to extend the deferral period ending December 31, 2011 and all deferral periods thereafter must be made by the Participant in writing at least 12 months prior to the end of
the deferral period; and (ii) with respect to Elective Deferrals made prior to Plan Year 2005, no elections to extend the deferral period ending December 31, 2011 shall be permitted and payments otherwise scheduled to be made between
January 2, 2012 and March 15, 2012 shall be delayed and made between January 2, 2013 and March 15, 2013; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of November 30, 2010, as follows: 

1. Effective as of November 30, 2010, Section 7.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following to the end of the
fourth paragraph thereof: 
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant shall not be permitted to extend the deferral
period of Elective Deferrals made prior to Plan Year 2005 with a corresponding deferral period ending on December 31, 2011. Payment of such Elective Deferrals otherwise scheduled to be made between January 2, 2012 and March 15, 2012
shall be delayed and made between January 2, 2013 and March 15, 2013. The delay in payment shall not apply to any Participant who does not affirmatively consent to such delay in payment.” 

2. Effective as of November 30, 2010, Section 7.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following immediately after the
end of the second sentence of the existing fifth paragraph thereof: 
 “Effective November 30, 2010, notwithstanding
the foregoing, with respect to Elective Deferrals made for Plan Year 2005 and thereafter, elections to extend the deferral period ending December 31, 2011 and all deferral periods thereafter must (i) be made by the Participant in writing
at least 12 months prior to the end of such deferral period, (ii) shall not take effect until 12 months after the election is made, and (iii) must extend the applicable deferral period for a minimum of five additional years and a maximum
of fifteen additional years.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has caused this amendment to be executed by a duly
authorized member as of the date first set forth above. 
  

			
	 ERISA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE

 

	 By:
	 	 /s/ R. ANTHONY BENTEN

		 	 R. Anthony Benten

Chairman
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2791 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2791

 To make clear that an agency outside of the Department of Health and 
     Human Services may not designate, appoint, or employ special 
consultants, fellows, or other employees under subsection (f) or (g) of 
             section 207 of the Public Health Service Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2011

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make clear that an agency outside of the Department of Health and 
     Human Services may not designate, appoint, or employ special 
consultants, fellows, or other employees under subsection (f) or (g) of 
             section 207 of the Public Health Service Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health and Human Services Hiree 
Clarification Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYMENT OF SPECIAL CONSULTANTS AND FELLOWS FOR THE PUBLIC 
              HEALTH SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 207(f) of the Public Health Service Act 
(42 U.S.C. 209(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``This subsection and subsection (g) do not authorize the designation, 
appointment, or employment of any special consultant, fellow, or other 
employee by an agency outside of the Department of Health and Human 
Services.''.
    (b) Technical Corrections.--Section 207(h) of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 209(h)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``subsection (f)'' and inserting 
        ``subsection (g)''; and
            (2) by striking ``subsection (e)'' and inserting 
        ``subsection (f)''.
    (c) Applicability.--The amendments made by this section apply with 
respect to special consultants, fellows, and other employees appointed 
on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 11**

 

**STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS**

 

Basic earnings per common share of $0.14 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 were calculated by dividing net income of $419,000 for theperiod July 1, 2005 to September 30, 2005 by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding of 2,938,579. 

 

Basic earnings per common share of $0.38 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were calculated by dividing net income of $1,116,000 for theperiod January 1, 2005 to September 30, 2005 by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding of 2,945,091.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-63500 and 333-16547 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement Nos. 33-80384
and 333-21493 on Form S-3 of I-Flow Corporation of our reports dated February
19, 1998, appearing, and incorporated by reference, in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of I-Flow Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1997.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa Mesa, California
January 6, 1999



                                       48
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Millennium
Healthcare Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony Urbano, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Anthony Urbano      |  | Date: April 15, 2014
|----------------------- |  | --------------------
|Anthony Urbano          |  |                     
|Chief Financial Officer |  |
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Carlos Frias, Chief Executive Officer of Freedom
Leaf Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the  amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2019 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: August 31, 2020 | By: | /s/ Carlos Frias                                                                                            
|--------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |     | Chief Executive Officer
                                                       (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2811 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2811

To rescind all unobligated funds made available for capital assistance 
     for high-speed rail corridors under the American Recovery and 
                       Reinvestment Act of 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 5, 2011

 Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To rescind all unobligated funds made available for capital assistance 
     for high-speed rail corridors under the American Recovery and 
                       Reinvestment Act of 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HIGH-SPEED RAIL FUNDING RESCISSION.

    All funds made available for capital assistance for high-speed rail 
corridors under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 
(Public Law 111-5; 123 Stat. 208) that remain unobligated are hereby 
rescinded.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          80,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    644,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               819,000
<PP&E>                                       2,521,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,074,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,459,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,623,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,308,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,498,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,459,000
<SALES>                                      3,416,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,416,000
<CGS>                                        2,945,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,945,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             183,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,656,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (971,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,685,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,685,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)
        

</TABLE>
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 16 

To make effective appointment of Senate Legal Counsel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. REID) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To make effective appointment of Senate Legal Counsel. 

1 Resolved, That the appointment of Patricia Mack 

2 Bryan of Virginia to be Senate Legal Counsel, made by 

3 the President pro tempore this day, is effective as of Janu4 ary 3, 2015, and the term of service of the appointee shall 

5 expire at the end of the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6044

RAYMOND ANTHONY WINKLER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-165-1) Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 20, 2005 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Anthony Winkler, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Raymond Anthony Winkler, a Virginia prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Winkler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Winkler’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE 10-KSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 FOR DBS INDUSTRIES,
INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                            402,588
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  771,532
<PP&E>                             73,277
<DEPRECIATION>                     34,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,629,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           6,902,347
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                            2,351
<OTHER-SE>                     (2,275,520)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,629,177
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   11,420
<CGS>                              10,850
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                3,324,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                395,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (3,750,983)
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (427,218)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (3,752,583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (0.648)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.648)

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00191-CV

Austin Metal Productions Company, Inc., a/k/a Austin Material Handling, Co., Appellant

v.

ASI Storage Solutions, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-11-001064, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed an agreed motion to dismissits appeal, explaining that the parties

have settled their dispute. We grant the motion and dismissthe appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: May 24, 2013
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2661 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2661

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to waive the requirement to report the 
 arrival at any port or place within the United States of a vessel of 
 Canada if the vessel does not anchor or dock at any harbor within the 
                customs territory of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2011

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to waive the requirement to report the 
 arrival at any port or place within the United States of a vessel of 
 Canada if the vessel does not anchor or dock at any harbor within the 
                customs territory of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF REQUIREMENT TO REPORT ARRIVAL OF VESSELS OF CANADA 
              THAT DO NOT ANCHOR OR DOCK AT ANY HARBOR WITHIN THE 
              CUSTOMS TERRITORY OF THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) In General.--Section 433(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1433(a)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
    ``(2)(A) The requirement to report under paragraph (1) shall not 
apply with respect to the arrival at any port or place within the 
United States of a vessel of Canada if the vessel does not anchor or 
dock at any harbor within the customs territory of the United States.
    ``(B) In this paragraph--
            ``(i) the term `customs territory of the United States' has 
        the meaning given the term in General Note 2 to the Harmonized 
        Tariff Schedule of the United States; and
            ``(ii) the term `vessel of Canada' means any vessel 
        documented under the laws of the Canada.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply with respect 
to arrival at any port or place within the United States of vessels of 
Canada described in paragraph (2) of section 433(a) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 (as added by subsection (a)) on or after the date on which the 
Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security certify to 
Congress that the Government of Canada has enacted a law that provides 
equivalent treatment to vessels of the United States arriving at any 
port or place within Canada.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23

To:      Lukens Medical Corporation
         3820 Academy Parkway North, N.E.
         Albuquerque, New Mexico  87109

     We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference,   in  the  Registration
Statements  on Form S-8  pertaining  to the stock option plan of Lukens  Medical
Corporation,  as amended (Registration Numbers 33-83082,  33-68122 and 33-51730)
and the related  prospectuses,  and in the  Registration  Statements on Form S-3
(Registration Numbers 333-28243 and 333-36499) of our report to the consolidated
financial  statements  and schedules of Lukens Medical  Corporation  included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                            NEFF & COMPANY

                                            /s/ Neff & Company LLP

Albuquerque, New Mexico
March 30, 1998




                                       28
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          25,077
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,607
<PP&E>                                         127,207
<DEPRECIATION>                                 102,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 326,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,458
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,213
<OTHER-SE>                                     238,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   326,406
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               738,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (708,261)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (706,919)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (706,919)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>