alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1****GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES****COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**           Fiscal Year Ended   February 25,  February 26,   2006  2005   (Dollars in thousands) Earnings:        Income before income taxes $318,376  $306,386 Add:        Interest on indebtedness  30,793   19,213 Equity income, net of distributions  582   3,461 Minority losses  1,673   3,799 Portion of rents representative of theinterest factor  1,151   1,259 Amortization of capitalized interest  780   686        Earnings available for fixed charges $353,355  $334,804                 Fixed charges:        Interest on indebtedness  30,793   19,213 Portion of rents representative of theinterest factor  1,151   1,259 Capitalized interest  176   1,195        Total fixed charges $32,120  $21,667                 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  11.00   15.45
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,153,649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  970,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,775
<INVENTORY>                                    196,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         132,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                 271,411
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,387,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,026,795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         11
<COMMON>                                         9,402
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,713,678)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,387,530
<SALES>                                      2,861,392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,861,392
<CGS>                                        1,876,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,955,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             221,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,254,598)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,407
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,258,005)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,258,005)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>      5 
<LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
              EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, THE
              CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AND THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE
              CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
              ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
       
<S>                                  <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                       JUL-01-1998             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                   3,478                  1,184
<SECURITIES>                                 0                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                          115,150  <F1>           78,461  <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0                      0
<INVENTORY>                             53,133                 42,253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       186,406                128,265
<PP&E>                                  30,971  <F1>           18,136  <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                               0                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         260,435                177,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  106,379                 67,629
<BONDS>                                      0                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0                      0
<PREFERRED>                                  0                      0
<COMMON>                                    31                     29
<OTHER-SE>                             131,495                 98,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           258,782                177,997
<SALES>                                103,800                 87,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       103,800                 87,007
<CGS>                                   57,425                 47,318
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           57,425                 47,318
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        26,767                 20,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       1,825                    910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         17,795                 17,852
<INCOME-TAX>                             7,029                  7,085
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     10,766                 10,767
<DISCONTINUED>                               0                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0                      0
<CHANGES>                                    0                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            10,766                 10,767
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            $0.86                  $0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                            $0.84                  $0.92
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS NET AMOUNT
</FN>
         

</TABLE>
#### State of New York et al., Plaintiffs, v Clark E. McLeod, Defendant. McLeodUSA, Incorporated, Intervenor-Appellant; Eliot Spitzer, as Attorney General of the State of New York, Respondent.

Submitted January 7, 2008;

decided February 19, 2008

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 5:17, at 150 [3d ed rev]).
CIRCUIT COURT OF ALLEGHANY COUNTY

#### In re Custody of Patrick Sundance Shurtleff

July 11, 1983

By JUDGE DUNCAN M. BYRD, JR.

As the Court indicated at hearing, the one principle of law which is apparent and clear in all custody proceedings is that the best interests and welfare of the child are paramount and foremost. All other matters and interests are secondary and subordinate. This includes the equitable principle of "unclean hands" as it applies to the natural father, Neal P. Harth, in this case. *Brown v*Kittle, 225 Va. 451 (1983).

I am satisfied from the evidence that "the quality of custodial care" provided by the Petitioner, Neal P. Harth (natural father), will be substantially greater than that provided by the Defendant, Teresa Shurtleff (natural mother), and that the best interests of the child Patrick Sundance Shurtleff will be promoted by placing custody of Patrick Shurtleff with the Petitioner with visitation, as previously established with the Defendant.

The Final Order should reflect that the judgment shall become the judgment of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court. Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, § 16.1-297.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,752,720
<SECURITIES>                                 1,286,121
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,964)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,239,111
<PP&E>                                       1,531,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                 214,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,821,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          285,669
<BONDS>                                      4,137,670
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,476,535
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,194,467
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,289,405)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,821,154
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,849
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  223,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             108,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,244
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,244
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,244
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 183 (Friday, September 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10137]


Determination Pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me as the Secretary of State 
under the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), I 
hereby determine it is reasonably necessary to achieve one or more of 
the purposes set forth in section 204(b) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 4304(b)) 
to designate 2001 Connecticut Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20008, which 
is owned by the Government of the Russian Federation, as a location and 
facilities for which entry or access is strictly prohibited by all 
individuals, including but not limited to representatives or employees 
of the Russian Government and their dependents, without first obtaining 
written permission from the Department of State's Office of Foreign 
Missions. Such prohibitions will take effect as of 2:00 p.m. Eastern 
Daylight Time on September 2, 2017.
    As a result, all persons on the said property are required to 
depart the premises no later than the date and time stated above.
    For purposes of this determination, 2001 Connecticut Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20008, includes any buildings and/or improvements 
thereon and the land ancillary thereto.
    Access to the property will be subject to terms and conditions set 
forth by the Office of Foreign Missions.

Rex W. Tillerson,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-20271 Filed 9-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-43-P
#### James P. MITCHELL, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff, v. Almando S. SAVINI d/b/a Stoughton Sand and Gravel Co., Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 59-633.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

Jan. 19, 1960.

Thomas L. Thistle, Regional Atty., Dept, of Labor, Albert H. Ross, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Walter G. Murphy, Boston, Mass., for defendant.

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

The Secretary of Labor brought this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., on behalf of eleven employees of the defendant to recover overtime wages. In answer, the defendant relies on various exemptions from the provisions of the Act and alleges that the work performed by the use-plaintiffs was seasonal, that the defendant’s business is a retail establishment, and that the use-plaintiffs were engaged in a retailing capacity.

The case is before me now on the plaintiff’s objections to certain interrogatories propounded by the defendant which ask with respect to each use-plaintiff for the work weeks in question:

c) The nature and type of work performed and the number of hours.

d) The geographical locations where such work was performed.

*276e) The nature of the project or job being worked on.

f) The identity of the person, firm or •corporation for whom the work was being performed.

i) Whether such work was seasonal.

j) Whether such work was devoted to manufacture or sale.

The plaintiff has objected generally to these interrogatories on the grounds that to answer would require the plaintiff to make an additional investigation of records which are in the defendant’s custody, and that the information requested is immaterial and irrelevant to the issues •of the case.

 The objections are overruled as to sub-parts c, d, and e of interrogatories 2 to 12 inclusive. This information is clearly relevant to the case, and the plaintiff would have to gather most of it for its own preparation of trial. The fact that the basis of the information sought is contained in the defendant’s records is not controlling. One purpose of interrogatories is to obtain admissions from the adverse party, to discover what the adverse party contends the facts are.

The objection to part f of Nos. 2 to 12 is sustained, since that information is irrelevant. See McLeod v. Threlkeld, 319 U.S. 491, 63 S.Ct. 1248, 87 L.Ed. 1538.

The objection to parts i and j ■of interrogatories 2 to 12 is sustained on the ground that these interrogatories inquire into matters which are ultimately for the court to determine.

Interrogatory No. 15 asks for a copy of an investigator's report to her superiors. The plaintiff objects on the ground that the report contains privileged matter, and, by the Deputy Solicitor of Labor, has filed a formal claim of privilege. The objection to this interrogatory is sustained on the dual ground that the report is privileged and that the production of documents is governed by Rule 34, 28 U.S.C.A.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2360 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to extend the Constitution, 

laws, and jurisdiction of the United States to installations and devices 

attached to the seabed of the Outer Continental Shelf for the production 

and support of production of energy from sources other than oil and 

gas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2011 

Mr. LANDRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to extend 

the Constitution, laws, and jurisdiction of the United 

States to installations and devices attached to the seabed 

of the Outer Continental Shelf for the production and 

support of production of energy from sources other than 

oil and gas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing for Our 

5 Workforce and Energy Resources Act’’ or the ‘‘POWER 

6 Act’’. 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2360 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CONSTITUTION, LAWS, AND JURIS2 DICTION OF THE UNITED STATES TO ENERGY 

3 FACILITIES AND DEVICES ON THE OUTER 

4 CONTINENTAL SHELF. 

5 Section 4(a)(1) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands 

6 Act (43 U.S.C. 1333(a)(1)) is amended by— 

7 (1) inserting ‘‘or producing or supporting pro8 duction of energy from sources other than oil and 

9 gas’’ after ‘‘therefrom’’; 

10 (2) inserting ‘‘or transmitting such energy’’ 

11 after ‘‘transporting such resources’’; and 

12 (3) inserting ‘‘and other energy’’ after ‘‘That 

13 mineral’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly  report of Creative  Eateries  Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September  30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Frank Holdraker,  certify to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Frank Holdraker
---------------------------
Frank Holdraker, President
December 14, 2005


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly  report of Creative  Eateries  Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September  30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I,  Cheryl  Brock,  certify to the best of my  knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Cheryl Brock
---------------------------
Cheryl Brock, CFO
December 14, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2491 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2491

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow refunds of Federal 
 motor fuel excise taxes on fuels used in mobile mammography vehicles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2011

Mr. Luetkemeyer (for himself and Mrs. Myrick) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow refunds of Federal 
 motor fuel excise taxes on fuels used in mobile mammography vehicles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mobile Mammography Promotion Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. REFUNDS OF FEDERAL MOTOR FUEL EXCISE TAXES FOR FUEL USED IN 
              MOBILE MAMMOGRAPHY VEHICLES.

    (a) Refunds.--Section 6427 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to fuels not used for taxable purposes) is amended by 
inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Fuels Used in Mobile Mammography Vehicles.--Except as 
provided in subsection (k), if any fuel on which tax was imposed by 
section 4041 or 4081 is used in any highway vehicle designed 
exclusively to provide mobile mammography services to patients within 
such vehicle, the Secretary shall pay (without interest) to the 
ultimate purchaser of such fuel an amount equal to the aggregate amount 
of the tax imposed on such fuel.''.
    (b) Exemption From Retail Tax.--Section 4041 of such Code is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(n) Fuels Used in Mobile Mammography Vehicles.--No tax shall be 
imposed under this section on any liquid sold for use in, or used in, 
any highway vehicle designed exclusively to provide mobile mammography 
services to patients within such vehicle.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Benjamin Maurice JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. David MITCHELL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-7719.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 30, 2008.

Decided: June 24, 2008.

Benjamin Maurice Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Maurice Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 *238U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*