In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-0726V

UNPUBLISHED

FRANK GIBBS,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: May 5, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Damages Decision Based on Proffer; 

Tetanus Diphtheria acellular 

Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder 

Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for 

Petitioner.

Matthew Murphy, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On May 16, 2019, Frank Gibbs filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2(the “Vaccine 

Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered left shoulder injuries related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of a Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (“Tdap”)

vaccine received on June 14, 2018. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that he 

received the vaccine in the United States, his pain lasted longer than six months, and that 

neither Petitioner nor any other party has ever received compensation in the form of an 

award or settlement for Petitioner’s vaccine-related injury. Petition at ¶¶ 1, 7, 8; Ex. 1 at 

1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic 

Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the 

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact 

medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. 

If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from 

public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. 

§ 300aa (2012).
2

On March 17, 2022, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled 

to compensation for SIRVA. On May 5, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on award of 

compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $101,289.03. Proffer at 

2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. 

Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated 

in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump 

sum payment of $101,289.03 (representing $100,000.00 in pain and suffering and 

$1,289.03 in unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 

Section 15(a). 

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

FRANK GIBBS, 

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES, 

Respondent.

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. 19-726V 

Chief Special Master Corcoran

ECF

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On May 16, 2019, Frank Gibbs (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or 

“Act”), alleging that he suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration

(“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of a tetanus, 

diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine he received on June 14, 2018. Petition at 1. 

On March 16, 2022, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed an 

Amended Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the 

terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury, and on March 17, 2022, the Chief Special Master 

issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 43; ECF 

No. 45. 

I. Items of Compensation

A. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $100,000.00 in pain and suffering. 

See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
2 

B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that he incurred past unreimbursable expenses 

related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past 

unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $1,289.03. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(B). 

Petitioner agrees.

These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled 

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. 

II. Form of the Award

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. 

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a 

lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and 

the Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $101,289.03, in the form of 

a check payable to petitioner. 

III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment

Lump sum payable to petitioner, Frank Gibbs: $101,289.03

Respectfully submitted, 

BRIAN M. BOYNTON

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO

Acting Director 

Torts Branch, Civil Division 

HEATHER L. PEARLMAN

Deputy Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

 

 

1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court 

for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings 

and future pain and suffering.
3 

 TRACI R. PATTON

Assistant Director

 Torts Branch, Civil Division

s/ Matthew L. Murphy 

 Matthew L. Murphy

 Trial Attorney

 Torts Branch, Civil Division

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 146

Benjamin Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044-0146

(202) 616-4840

 matthew.murphy@usdoj.gov

DATED: May 5, 2022