alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2768 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2768

 To cancel public debt held by the Federal Reserve System and to lower 
               the public debt limit by an equal amount.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2011

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To cancel public debt held by the Federal Reserve System and to lower 
               the public debt limit by an equal amount.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debt Crisis Resolution Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. CANCELLATION OF PUBLIC DEBT HELD BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM.

    (a) Canceling of Debt.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall cancel 
all obligations of the United States Government issued under chapter 31 
of title 31, United States Code, that are held by the Federal Reserve 
System.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-17-042]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: September 28, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered: 
1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 731-TA-313, 314, 317, and 379 (Fourth Review) 
(Brass Sheet and Strip from France, Germany, Italy, and Japan). The 
Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its 
determinations and views of the Commission by October 13, 2017.
5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 11, 2017.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-19649 Filed 9-12-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ICR SERVICES, INCORPORATED, a Michigan Corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 06-3924.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 2008.

Decided Jan. 11, 2008.

C. Steven Baker, Federal Trade Commission, Chicago, IL, Michael D. Bergman, Federal Trade Commission, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Hugh M. Davis, Jr., Constitutional Litigation Associates, Detroit, MI, for Defendants-Appellants.

*891Before Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge, and Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge.

Order

In 2003 a district court entered a consent order that had been negotiated between the Federal Trade Commission and ICR Services. The order required ICR to pay $1,150,000 to the FTC, which would use the money to compensate consumers who had been injured by ICR’s false or deceptive statements. The first installment of $350,000 was to be paid within a week; the remainder was due by the end of 2003 but could be reduced by sums that ICR paid in a class-action litigation pending in Alabama.

The second installment was not paid in 2003. By 2005 the amount due had been reduced to $505,943.21 as a result of payments in the class action. ICR maintained that it was entitled to a further credit of $499,000. The FTC disagreed and filed a “Motion to Clarify” asking the district judge to resolve the dispute. The judge sided with the FTC, and ICR has filed an appeal—which the FTC asks us to dismiss, on the ground that the judge’s opinion is not a “final decision” as 28 U.S.C. § 1291 uses that phrase. ICR has elected not to respond to that argument.

The order entered in 2003 was a final decision. Nothing that has happened since is a new “final decision.” The district judge has filed an opinion stating his understanding of ICR’s obligations under the 2003 judgment, but he has not entered any additional *relief*from which ICR could appeal. This court has held repeatedly that a district judge’s interpretation of the parties’ obligations under a judgment is not itself appealable. See, e.g., *Hispanics United of DuPage County v. Addison,*248 F.3d 617 (7th Cir.2001); *Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority,*178 F.3d 951 (7th Cir.1999); *Bogard v. Wright,*159 F.3d 1060 (7th Cir.1998); *Motorola, Inc. v. Computer Displays International, Inc.,*739 F.2d 1149, 1155 (7th Cir.1984). The judgment entered in 2003 has not been modified—or for that matter enforced. There is nothing from which ICR can appeal.

An attempt by the FTC to collect the judgment by levy on ICR’s assets might produce an appealable order, because post-judgment collection proceedings are treated as if they were separate litigation. See *ACORN v. Illinois State Board of Elections,*75 F.3d 304 (7th Cir.1996). As far as we can see, however, the FTC has not even tried to collect this judgment through supplemental proceedings.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                       960
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,630
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,132
<BONDS>                                         46,287
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,127
<SALES>                                         59,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,468
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,829
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 943
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,626
<INCOME-TAX>                                       679
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                947
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       947
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
a6614574ex10-10.htm


Exhibit 10.10


 


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE ROGERS CORPORATION


 


AMENDED AND RESTATED PENSION RESTORATION PLAN


 


 


WHEREAS, Rogers Corporation (the “Company”) established the Rogers Corporation Amended and Restated Pension Restoration Plan, effective as of January 1, 2005, which was amended and restated in its entirety on December 12, 2008 and further amended on September 30, 2009 (the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Article VI of the Plan, the Compensation and Organization Committee (the “Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors is authorized to amend the Plan, and the Committee has determined that amending the Plan is now appropriate and desirable to clarify its intended operation upon a Change of Control (as defined in Section 1.5 of the Plan).


 


NOW THEREFORE, that pursuant to the power reserved to the Committee under Article VI of the Plan, and by virtue of the authority delegated to the undersigned officer by votes of the Committee, the Plan as previously amended is hereby amended as follows effective January 1, 2009:


 


1.             The following Section 4.8(d) shall be added to the Plan


 



	
  

	
“(d)

	
For avoidance of doubt, payments under this Section 4.8 upon a Change of Control shall be in complete discharge of the Company’s obligations to Participants under the Plan.”







 


2.             The following provision shall be added at the end of the second sentence of Article VI of the Plan:


 


“and the lump sum distribution on account of a Change of Control under Section 4.8 shall result in the immediate termination of the Plan.”


 


EXCEPT AS AMENDED HEREIN, the terms of the Plan are confirmed and remain unchanged.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officer this 7th day of December, 2010.


 







 


ROGERS CORPORATION


 







 


By:  /s/ Robert M. Soffer


Its: Vice President and Secretary
NO. 01-15-00042-CR

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE

§

VS. § 1st COURT

§

MICHAEL BROWN § OF APPEALS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Michael Brown, Appellant in the above styled and

numbered cause, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file

appellant's brief, pursuant to Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure, and for good cause shows the following:

1. This case is on appeal from the 163rd Judicial District Court of

Orange County, Texas.

2. The case below was styled the State of Texas vs. Michael

Brown, and numbered B-140,443-R.

3. Appellant was convicted of Possession of a Controlled

Substance.

4. Appellant was assessed a sentence of Life on December 11,

2014.

5. Notice of appeal was given on December 16, 2014.

ACCEPTED

01-15-00042-cr

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

6/1/2015 11:33:41 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/1/2015 11:33:41 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
6. The clerk's record was filed on March 25, 2015; the reporter's

record was filed on February 25, 2015.

7. The appellate brief is presently due on May 26, 2015.

8. Appellant requests an extension of time of 30 days from the

present date, i.e. June 24, 2015.

9. One extension to file the brief has been received in this cause.

10. Defendant is currently ncarcerated.

11. Appellant relies on the following facts as good cause for the

requested extension:

The Attorney for Appellant has been laboring under a heavy caseload

and requires more time to prepare said brief.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this

Court grant this Motion To Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief, and for

such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

CHRISTINE R BROWN-ZETO

Attorney at Law

1107 Green Avenue

Orange, Texas 77630

Tel: (409) 886-8558

Fax: (409) 883-6523
By: /s/ Christine R. Brown-Zeto

Christine R. Brown-Zeto

State Bar No. 03102200

crbrownzeto@sbcglobal.net

Attorney for Michael Brown

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on May 4, 2015, a true and correct copy of the

above and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's

Office, Orange County, 801 Division, Orange, Texas 77630, by personal

delivery.

/s/ Christine R. Brown-Zeto

Christine R. Brown-Zeto
STATE OF TEXAS §

§

COUNTY OF ORANGE §

AFFIDAVIT

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally

appeared Christine R. Brown-Zeto, who after being duly sworn stated:

"I am the attorney for the appellant in the above numbered and

entitled cause. I have read the foregoing Motion To Extend

Time to File Appellant's Brief and swear that all of the

allegations of fact contained therein are true and correct."

/s/ Christine R. Brown-Zeto

Christine R. Brown-Zeto

Affiant

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on May 4, 2015, to

certify which witness my hand and seal of office.

/s/ Chrystal Murphy

Notary Public, State of Texas

My Commission Expires: June 2, 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2645 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2645

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase the minimum 
                loss ratio required of Medigap policies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2011

  Mr. Stark (for himself, Mr. Waxman, and Mr. Pallone) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 
 and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase the minimum 
                loss ratio required of Medigap policies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medigap Medical Loss Ratio 
Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN REQUIRED MEDIGAP LOSS RATIO.

    (a) In General.--Section 1882(r)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395ss(r)(1)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``75 percent'' and inserting ``85 
        percent''; and
            (2) by striking ``65 percent'' and inserting ``80 
        percent''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to policies for policy years beginning on or after January 1, 
2014.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43759-43760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.

[[Page 43760]]

Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve 
Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Comments must be received not later than October 4, 2017.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. James S. Schafer, The Villages, Florida; to retain voting shares 
of First American Bankshares, Inc., Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin, and 
thereby indirectly retain voting shares of PremierBank, Fort Atkinson, 
Wisconsin and Commercial Bank, Whitewater, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 14, 
2017.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-19932 Filed 9-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-C, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         166,985
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  320,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               487,309
<PP&E>                                         2,295,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,907,029)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 876,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,325
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     872,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   876,048
<SALES>                                        440,185
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               441,723
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,982<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                235,917
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            235,917
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   235,917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         (17,190)
<SECURITIES>                                   477,486
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0



<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               477,485
<PP&E>                                       1,089,146
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,035)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,776,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,606
<BONDS>                                        527,722
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,414,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,776,264
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  165,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   570
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (4,043)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (252,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (252,682)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (252,682)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2780 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2780

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the domestic 
    production activities deduction rules relating to allowance of 
           deduction by United States contract manufacturers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2011

 Mr. Tiberi (for himself and Mr. Neal) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the domestic 
    production activities deduction rules relating to allowance of 
           deduction by United States contract manufacturers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF RULES RELATING TO CONTRACT MANUFACTURERS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (10) of section 199(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``the same qualified 
production activities income derived from'' before ``any activity 
described in''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendments made by this section shall 
        apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) No inference.--Nothing in any amendment made by this 
        section shall be construed to create any inference with respect 
        to the application of section 199(d)(10) of the Internal 
        Revenue Code of 1986, or the authority of the Secretary of the 
        Treasury to provide regulations for such application, on or 
        before the date of the enactment of such amendment.
                                 <all>
```