alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CALIPER LIFE SCIENCES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, PeterF. McAree, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Companycertify, pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

 

(1)   The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

 

(2)   The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                    | /s/  PETER  F. MCAREE                                                                    |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                                                                               |
|                    | Peter  F. McAree  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer) |
|                    |                                                                                               |
|                    |                                                                                               |
| Date:  May 9, 2008 |                                                                                               |

 

----
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ruben Rios Esparza, * From the 350th District

 Court of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 10870-D.

Vs. No. 11-14-00118-CR, * October 23, 2014

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc. (the
Company), certifies that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 26, 2004 (the Report) of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December 26, 2004 and for
the period then ended.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 9, 2005



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Christopher F. Caesar                     
|Christopher F. Caesar                         
|Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|and Treasurer                                 

|
|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TELFORD EDWARD BAKER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 140 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of November, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Directors Compensation Summary Sheet



 Exhibit 10.16 
 DIRECTORS COMPENSATION SUMMARY SHEET 
 Nonemployee directors receive
compensation for board service. Payment dates are the last working day of March, June, September, and December. That compensation includes: 
  

			
	 Annual Retainer:
	  	$51,000
		
	 Chair Retainers:
	  	$125,000 annually for the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
		
		  	$30,000 annually for lead independent director (i.e., Outside Directors Committee chair) if there is no Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
		
		  	$30,000 annually for Audit Committee chair
		
		  	$20,000 annually for Executive Compensation Committee chair
		
		  	$10,000 annually for Governance and Nominating Committee chair and all other committee chairs
		
	 Attendance Fees:
	  	$2,000 for each board meeting (attended in person, conducted by telephone, or written consent in lieu of meeting)
		
		  	$1,000 for each committee meeting (attended in person, conducted by telephone, or written consent in lieu of meeting)
		
		  	Expenses related to attendance
		
	 Equity Based Compensation Award:
	  	$100,000 annually
#### Charlie Lee RICHARDSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Charles J. WILLIAMS, Human Resource Director of Cabarrus County Schools, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 08-1067.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 19, 2008.

Decided: June 23, 2008.

Charlie L. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Rainey, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charlie L. Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motions following the denial of relief on his civil complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judg*263ment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district coui’t extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 9, 2007, 2007 WL 3355669. The notice of appeal was filed on December 11, 2007. Because Richardson failed to tile a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                                   CNET, INC.
             STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           Three Months Ended               Six Months Ended   
                                                               June 30,                         June 30,         
                                                       ------------------------        -------------------------
                                                          1997         1996                1997         1996     
                                                       ----------   -----------        -----------   ----------- 
 <S>                                                   <C>          <C>                <C>           <C>
 Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   $5,016,050   $(4,320,477)       $(7,872,153)  $(8,019,000)
                                                       ----------   -----------        -----------   ----------- 

 Primary shares outstanding:                                  
   Weighted average shares outstanding                                                                           
      during the period:                                                                                         
      Preferred. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       -          5,707,204             -          5,707,204 
      Common . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   13,368,429     2,700,000         13,368,429     2,700,000 
   Shares issued and stock option and warrants                                                                   
      granted in accordance with SAB No. 83. . . . .       -            808,841             -            808,841 
   Common stock equivalent shares. . . . . . . . . .    1,578,786        -                  -             -
                                                       ----------   -----------        -----------   ----------- 
      Shares used in calculating per share data. . .   14,947,215     9,216,045         13,368,429     9,216,045 
                                                       ----------   -----------        -----------   ----------- 

      Primary net income (loss) per common stock 
           and common stock equivalent shares. . . .        $0.34        $(0.47)            $(0.59)       $(0.87)
                                                       ----------   -----------        -----------   ----------- 

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.2

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated January 29, 1997 (except Note 1, as to which the date is
May 7, 1997) in Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
(Form SB-2 No. 333-09349) and related Prospectus of AVAX Technologies, Inc.
(formerly Walden Laboratories, Inc.) for the registration of 7,047,788 shares of
common stock.


                                                    /s/  Ernst & Young LLP

                                                    Ernst & Young LLP


Kansas City, Missouri
August 13, 1997
    
<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20388]



[[Page 44694]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10142]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: ``Wiener Werkst[auml]tte, 1903-1932: The 
Luxury of Beauty'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Wiener Werkst[auml]tte, 1903-1932: The Luxury of Beauty,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Neue Galerie 
New York, in New York, New York, from on or about October 26, 2017, 
until on or about January 29, 2018, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office of the 
Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94e7f1f7e0fdfbfaa6a0a1add4e7e0f5e0f1baf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ea998f899e838584d8dedfd3aa999e8b9e8fc48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. Department 
of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of 
December 11, 2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
determinations be published in the Federal Register.

 Alyson Grunder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-20388 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2733 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to ensure that the basic allowance 

for housing in effect for a member of the National Guard is not reduced 

when the member transitions between active duty and full-time National 

Guard duty without a break in active service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2011 

Ms. BORDALLO (for herself and Mr. LOEBSACK) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to ensure that the 

basic allowance for housing in effect for a member of 

the National Guard is not reduced when the member 

transitions between active duty and full-time National 

Guard duty without a break in active service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2733 IH

1 SECTION 1. NO REDUCTION IN BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR 

2 HOUSING FOR ARMY NATIONAL GUARD AND 

3 AIR NATIONAL GUARD MEMBERS WHO TRAN4 SITION BETWEEN ACTIVE DUTY AND FULL5 TIME NATIONAL GUARD DUTY WITHOUT A 

6 BREAK IN ACTIVE SERVICE. 

7 Section 403(g) of title 37, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following new para9 graph: 

10 ‘‘(6) The rate of basic allowance for housing to be 

11 paid to a member of the Army National Guard of the 

12 United States or the Air National Guard of the United 

13 States shall not be reduced upon the transition of the 

14 member from active duty to full-time National Guard 

15 duty, or from full-time National Guard duty to active 

16 duty, when the transition occurs without a break in active 

17 service.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10725

Conference Calendar

 

LOUIS EDWARD SPEARMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PAULA McKNIGHT; DALLAS COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; JIM BOWLES,

Sheriff of Dallas; JOE LOBLEY; B. 

COUSINS LANE; KELLEY THOMPSON; 

292nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT 

OF DALLAS COUNTY TEXAS; WILLIAM 

JEFFREY BLACK, Judge,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:97-CV-3037-R

- - - - - - - - - -

June 16, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Louis Edward Spearman, Texas prisoner no. 708729, challenges

the district court’s refusal to grant IFP status on appeal based

upon its determination that the appeal was not taken in good

faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). 

Spearman makes no argument addressing the district court’s 
No. 98-10725 

-2-

reasons for its determination. Accordingly, we uphold the

district court’s certification decision and sua sponte DISMISS

Spearman’s appeal as FRIVOLOUS. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24;

5th Cir. R. 42.2. Spearman’s other pending motions are also

DENIED. 

The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike

for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Spearman that

once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any

civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained

in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS

DENIED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE REGISTRANT,
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamex Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the COMPANY), on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the REPORT),
Richard E. McClelland, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ RICHARD K. McCLELLAND
Richard K. McClelland
President and Chief Executive Officer
June 7, 2004 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2668 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the station of the United States Border Patrol 

located at 2136 South Naco Highway in Bisbee, Arizona, 

as the ‘‘Brian A. Terry Border Patrol Station’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2668 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Brian A. Terry Memo3 rial Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 The Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) A native of Flat Rock, Michigan, Agent 

7 Brian A. Terry served his country proudly with the 

8 United States Marine Corps and continued his serv9 ice as a police officer with the cities of Ecorse and 

10 Lincoln Park, Michigan, prior to joining the United 

11 States Border Patrol. 

12 (2) Agent Terry was a member of the 699th 

13 Session of the Border Patrol Academy assigned to 

14 the Naco Border Patrol Station within the Tucson 

15 Sector. 

16 (3) On December 14, 2010, Border Patrol 

17 Agent Brian A. Terry was conducting a Border Pa18 trol Tactical unit (BORTAC) operation in the area 

19 of ‘‘Peck Wells’’. 

20 (4) At 11:15 p.m., near Rio Rico, Arizona, and 

21 about 15 miles north of Nogales, Arizona, Agent 

22 Terry and his team spotted a group of individuals 

23 approaching their position. 

24 (5) Shortly thereafter, an encounter ensued and 

25 gunfire was exchanged that left Agent Terry mor26 tally wounded. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2668 RFS 

1 (6) Agent Terry succumbed to his injuries on 

2 December 15, 2010. 

3 (7) Agent Terry is survived by his mother, fa4 ther, stepmother, stepfather, brother, and two sis5 ters. 

6 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION. 

7 The station of the United States Border Patrol lo8 cated at 2136 South Naco Highway in Bisbee, Arizona, 

9 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Brian A. Terry 

10 Border Patrol Station’’. 

11 SEC. 4. REFERENCES. 

12 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

13 paper, or other record of the United States to the station 

14 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

15 to the ‘‘Brian A. Terry Border Patrol Station’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2768 

To cancel public debt held by the Federal Reserve System and to lower 

the public debt limit by an equal amount. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2011 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To cancel public debt held by the Federal Reserve System 

and to lower the public debt limit by an equal amount. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Debt Crisis Resolution 

5 Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CANCELLATION OF PUBLIC DEBT HELD BY THE 

7 FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM. 

8 (a) CANCELING OF DEBT.—The Secretary of the 

9 Treasury shall cancel all obligations of the United States 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2768 IH

1 Government issued under chapter 31 of title 31, United 

2 States Code, that are held by the Federal Reserve System. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 of Energy 11, L.P. (the “Company”).  I, David McKenney, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that, based on my knowledge:





(1)
The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in this report.





Date:  April 14, 2015
By:
/s/ David McKenneyName:
David McKenneyTitle:
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.