alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurances regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation;
and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    S / DAVID A. WIDLAKDavid A. WidlakPresident and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Vernal Shawn BAKER, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-7545.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 2, 2008.

Decided: June 19, 2008.

*248Vernal Shawn Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Miller A. Bushong, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vernal Shawn Baker seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 2000 & Supp.2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Baker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          61,065
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,477,862
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,561,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,772,773
<PP&E>                                      13,695,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,915,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,729,844
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        400
<COMMON>                                         1,763
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,174,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,915,533
<SALES>                                     33,388,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,388,685
<CGS>                                       25,892,897
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,892,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,164,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             731,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                459,284
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            459,284
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   459,284
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
CIRCUIT COURT OF AMHERST COUNTY

#### Commonwealth of Virginia v. Karl William Melton, Jr.

September 7, 2007

Case No. CR07012980

By Judge J. Michael Gamble

I am writing to rule on the motion by the defendant for the appointment of a toxicologist. The motion is denied.

A defendant’s right to the appointment of a non-psychiatric expert is not absolute. *Husske*v. *Commonwealth,*252 Va. 203, 211-12, 476 S.E.2d 920 (1996). When a defendant seeks an appointment of an expert, the defendant must demonstrate that the expert is likely to be a significant factor in his defense and that he will be prejudiced by the lack of expert assistance. *Ake v. Oklahoma,*470 U.S. 68, 82-83, 105 S. Ct. 1087, 84 L. Ed. 2d 53 (1985). In *Husske,*the Supreme Court of Virginia held that the indigent defendant must demonstrate that the services of the expert would materially assist him in the preparation of his defense and the defendant must show a particularized need for the expert. *Husske,*252 Va. at 212.

In the instant case, the defendant has failed to demonstrate a particularized need for the expert or how the expert would materially assist him in the preparation of his defense. In his motion and argument, the defendant generally asserts that a toxicologist would provide assistance to his defense and the toxicologist would establish that the breath test was not conducted in accordance with the required procedures. The defendant, however, has not set forth any particularized reason why the breath test procedures had not been followed and how this will be material to his defense.

*487Mere hope or suspicion that favorable evidence is available is not enough to require that an expert be appointed. The defendant has the burden to demonstrate his particularized need by establishing that the expert services would materially help him in preparing his defense. *Sanchez*v. Commonwealth, 268 Va. 161, 165, 597 S.E.2d 197 (2004). In this case, the defendant’s request for the appointment of a toxicologist to assist him is based on a mere hope or suspicion that favorable evidence can be found. Certainly, nothing has been furnished that would establish that the lack of the assistance of an expert would result in a fundamentally unfair trial. See Sanchez, 268 Va. at 165.

*Order*

For the reasons set forth in the opinion letter dated September 7,2007, the court doth adjudge, order, and decree that the motion of the defendant for the appointment of a toxicologist is denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
Number 33-66826 (dated August 2, 1993 on Form S-8), Number 33-78546 (dated May
2, 1994 on Form S-8), Number 33-71416 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Form
S-1 on Form S-3 dated May 16, 1995), Number 33-95432 (dated August 4, 1995 on
Form S-8), Number 333-1748 (dated March 28, 1996 on Form S-3), Number 333-19471
(dated January 9, 1997 on Form S-3), File No. 333-33321 (dated August 8, 1997 on
Form S-3), File No. 333-47077 (dated February 27, 1998 on Form S-3), File No.
333-57249 (dated June 19, 1998 on Form S-8), File No. 333-82785 (dated July 13,
1999 on Form S-3), File No. 333-94583 (dated January 13, 2000 on Form S-3) File
No. 333-46116 File No. 333-94583 (dated September 19, 2000 on Form S-3) and File
No. 333-54804 (dated February 1, 2001 on Form S-3) of DynaGen, Inc., of our
report dated March 31, 2001, which included an explanatory paragraph about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern, appearing in this Amendment
No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of DynaGen, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2000.


/s/ Wolf & Company, P.C.
Boston, Massachusetts
April 27, 2001
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.49

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                                     BETWEEN
                              DBS INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                       AND
                           FREDERICK R. SKILLMAN, JR.

         Pursuant to the Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") dated July 28,
1999, by and between DBS Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company") and Frederick R, Skillman, Jr. (the "Employee") collectively the
"parties", the terms and conditions are hereby amended as follows:

         Article III, Section 3.4. STOCK OPTIONS: Employee shall be granted
         stock options to purchase 150,000 shares of DBSI's common stock at an
         exercise price determined by the closing price of DBSI stock on
         September 1, 1999 at a discounted exercise price of $.7573 per share as
         approved by the Board of Directors on September 1, 1999. The options
         are subject to vesting, 75,000 of which shall vest immediately at
         September 1, 1999, and the remainder shall vest at the end of the
         Employment Term on July 31, 2000. In addition, the stock options are
         subject to (a) further terms and conditions set forth herein and in
         Stock Option Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A and (b) the
         Employee's execution of the Stock Option Agreement and all documents
         customarily required by the Company to effect the grant of the options.

         In connection with the Company's intention to file a registration
         statement to register shares of its common stock for an employee
         benefit plan on Form S-8, the Company shall also use its best efforts
         to register the common stock underlying the stock options granted to
         Employee pursuant to this Section 3.4.

         All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain
as found in the original Agreement dated July 28, 1999, except for revisions
approved by Board action.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed and delivered this
Agreement as of this 1st day of September, 1999.

EMPLOYER:                               DBS INDUSTRIES, INC.

                                  BY:
                                      -------------------------
                                      FRED W. THOMPSON, PRESIDENT

EMPLOYEE:                         BY:
                                      -------------------------
                                      FREDERICK R. SKILLMAN, JR.


                                       1
B. G., MOTHER OF C.A.T. AND B.A.B.

,
Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

,
Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4097

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 6, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for O kaloosa County

. Mary Polson , Judge

.
Jason A. Cobb, Defuniak Springs , for Appellant.

Stephanie C. Zimmerman, Department of Children and Families, Tallahassee, and Kelly A. Swartz, Guardian ad Litem, Sanford , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL

, BILBREY

, and JAY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




SECOND AMENDMENT TO TIME SHARE AGREEMENT




     This Second Amendment to Time Share Agreement (this “Amendment”) between STEELCASE INC.
(“Timesharer”) and JAMES P. HACKETT (“Timesharee”) is made this 9th day of November, 2011.



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, Timesharer and Timesharee entered into a certain Aircraft Time-Sharing Agreement
dated December 15, 2005, as amended (the “Time Share Agreement”) to allow Timesharee use of certain
designated aircraft owned or leased by Timesharer; and



     WHEREAS, Timesharer and Timesharee now wish to amend the Time Share Agreement to change the
definition of “Aircraft.”



     NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, and for good
and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties amend the Time
Share Agreement as follows:




	1.	 	All references to the “Aircraft” in the Time Share Agreement shall now mean that certain
Falcon 900EX aircraft bearing Federal Aviation Administration Registration No. N375SC and
Manufacturer’s Serial No. 215 and that certain Falcon 2000EX aircraft bearing Federal Aviation
Administration Registration No. N377SC Manufacturer’s
Serial No. 227, each currently owned or
leased by Timesharer.






	2.	 	Except to the extent modified by this Amendment, the Time Share Agreement is hereby ratified
and affirmed.




The parties have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	TIMESHARER:


STEELCASE INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Steve Waugh
 	 
	 	 	Steven M. Waugh 	 
	 	 	Its: Assistant Treasurer 	 
	 
	 	TIMESHAREE:

 	 
	 	/s/ James P. Hackett
 	 
	 	James P. Hackett
<PAGE>   1
COMMUNITY CENTRAL BANK CORPORATION
FORM 10-QSB (continued)

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                          2001             2000
                                                          ----             ----
                                                   (in thousand, except per share data)
<S>                                                <C>               <C>
BASIC

Income Before Cumulative Effect
   of Accounting Change                                   $399              $395
/ Weighted Average Shares                                2,608             2,601
                                                        ------           -------
   Per Share                                              0.15             0.15
                                                        ------           -------

Basic Earnings Per Share                                 $0.15             $0.15
                                                        ======           =======


DILUTED

Income Before Cumulative Effect
   of Accounting Change                                   $399              $395
/ Weighted Average Shares                                2,609             2,601
                                                        ------           -------
   Per Share                                              0.15             0.15
                                                        ------           -------

Diluted Earnings Per Share                               $0.15             $0.15
                                                        ======           =======
</TABLE>





                                       24
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 182 (Thursday, September 21, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44195-44196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20145]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4337-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Florida; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-4337-DR), dated September 10, 2017, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 11, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of September 10, 2017.


[[Page 44196]]


    Clay, Duval, Flagler, Putnam, and St. Johns Counties for 
Individual Assistance (already designated for debris removal and 
emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], including direct 
federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-20145 Filed 9-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7546
FRANKIE LEE ASKINS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS INSTITUTE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA95-3192-CCB) Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 13, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frankie Lee Askins, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Askins v. Corcoran , No. CA-95-3192-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 15.1

|[DELOITTE LOGO] |  | Deloitte & Touche S.pA.
Piazza San Vito, 37
31100 Treviso
Italia
Tel: +39 0422 5875
Fax: +39 0422 579471
www.deloitte.it
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                |  |                                                                                                                         

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Luxottica Group S.p.A

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Luxottica Group S.p.A.'s previously filed Registration Statements on form S-8 (Reg. Nos. 333-14006 and 333-9546) of our report dated
March 15, 2004 (April 18, 2004, as to Note 15), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Luxottica Group S.p.A. for the year ended December 31,
2003.

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE

Treviso,
Italy
June 25, 2004

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,484
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     54,518
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234,099
<PP&E>                                       3,521,935
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,604,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,440,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          838,312
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  6,000,000
<COMMON>                                       103,984
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,169,181)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,440,620
<SALES>                                        105,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,252
<CGS>                                          203,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               580,888
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              83,955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (761,316)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (761,316)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (761,316)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>