alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-12-00873-CV

Style: Texas Municipal Power Agency

v Kirk A. Johnston

Date motion filed*: December 27, 2012

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file reply brief filed 

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Reply Brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: December 27, 2012

Number of previous extensions granted: -0- Current Due date: December 27, 2012

Date Requested: January 7, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: January 7, 2013

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: January 28, 2013
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19859]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; P41 BTRC Review Meeting 
(2018/01).
    Date: October 16-18, 2017.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Chase Park Plaza Royal, 212 N. Kingshighway Blvd., 
St. Louis, MO 63108.
    Contact Person: Dennis Hlasta, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging And Bioengineering, 
National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 496-4773, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#36525358585f45185e5a5745425776585f5e18515940"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cfabaaa1a1a6bce1a7a3aebcbbae8fa1a6a7e1a8a0b9">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; ESTEEMED (R25) Review Meeting 
(2018/01).
    Date: November 8, 2017.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, Suite 
920, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Dennis Hlasta, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging And Bioengineering, 
National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 451-4794, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f6929398989f85d89e9a97858297b6989f9ed8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4125242f2f28326f292d20323520012f28296f262e37">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 13, 2017.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-19859 Filed 9-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15314 and #15315; Georgia Disaster Number GA-00100]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4338-DR), dated 09/15/2017. *Incident:*
                         Hurricane Irma. *Incident Period:*
                         09/07/2017 and continuing.
 DATES: Issued on 09/15/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/14/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/15/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/15/2017, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*
                     Camden, Chatham, Glynn *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Georgia: Brantley, Bryan, Charlton, Effingham, Mcintosh, Wayne Florida: Nassau South Carolina: Jasper The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.500Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.750Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.610Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 153148 and for economic injury is 153150. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2017-20315 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 2 1

- 1499 V

UNPUBLISHED

ELIZABETH LANDERS, on behalf of

her minor child, I.L

. ,

Petitioner

,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: February 22, 2022

Withdrawal of petition ; Order concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On June 23, 2021

, Elizabeth Landers filed a petition for compensation on behalf

of her minor child, I.L., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 1 0 through 34

. 2 Petitioner allege d tha t I.L

. suffered injuries after receiving a human papillomavirus vaccination on September 12, 2019

. ECF no. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “ that the petitioner may withdraw the petition

under section 300aa

— 21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section

300aa

— 21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master. ” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 12 (g )

. O n Febr uary 20, 2022

, Petitioner timely filed a notice to

withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. § 300aa

— 21(b).

In light of Petitioner ’ s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. §

300aa

— 21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner ’ s request to withdraw the petition is GRANTED . Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment “on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk ’s Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this

case

, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755.2 s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Education Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 /s/ Yan Bin
Guo
 Yan Bin
Guo
 President,
Chief Executive Officer,
 
 May 18,
2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 28, 2013

t0520

Order 

Clerk

May 28, 2013

146360 & (10)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146360

COA: 309470

Ingham CC: 09-001284-FC

DONTREL MARQUIS BIRGE, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7546

FRANKIE LEE ASKINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; MARYLAND HOUSE OF

CORRECTIONS INSTITUTE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA95-3192-CCB)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 13, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frankie Lee Askins, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Askins v. Corcoran, No. CA-95-3192-CCB (D. Md.

Aug. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          17,978
<SECURITIES>                                     4,412
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                       670
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,530
<PP&E>                                           2,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,343
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           165
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,242
<SALES>                                          4,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,508
<CGS>                                              467
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    784
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                784
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Benjamin RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-40601

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 19, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

*349PER CURIAM: *

Benjamin Rodriguez-Rodriguez (Rodriguez) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. He argues that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) based on a finding that his Texas conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver was a “drug trafficking offense.” Rodriguez correctly concedes that his Guidelines argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Ford,*509 F.3d 714, 717 (5th Cir.2007), and he raises it solely to preserve its further review.

In light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Rodriguez also challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. This argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 13.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Luxottica Group S.p.A. (the Company) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Enrico Cavatorta, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:  1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:
/s/ ENRICO CAVATORTAEnrico CavatortaChief Financial OfficerDated:   April 27, 2012  This written statement accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Retrospettiva, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the "Report"), I, Borivoje Vukadinovic, the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.








Date:  May 12, 2014








/s/ Borivoje Vukadinovic


Borivoje Vukadinovic,


Principal Executive Officer








/s/ Borivoje Vukadinovic


Borivoje Vukadinovic,


Principal Financial Officer
EX-35.4
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.
c/o Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
375 Park Avenue 2nd floor
J0127-023
New York, New York 10152-023

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage
    Securities Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2013-
    C14

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2013 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
    performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's
    supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
    has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
    respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 10, 2014


/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2719 

AN ACT 

To ensure public access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain in the Hanford Reach National Monument for educational, recreational, historical, scientific, cultural, and 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2719 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rattlesnake Mountain 

3 Public Access Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) The Hanford Reach National Monument is 

7 public land that belongs to the American people. 

8 (2) The United States Fish and Wildlife Serv9 ice’s Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) for 

10 the Monument restricts public access to large por11 tions of the Monument, including the summit of 

12 Rattlesnake Mountain. 

13 (3) Public access to Rattlesnake Mountain is 

14 important for educational, recreational, historical, 

15 scientific, and cultural purposes. 

16 (4) Rattlesnake Mountain reaches an elevation 

17 of 3,660 feet above sea level—the highest elevation 

18 of the Monument, and provides unparalleled scenic 

19 views over the Monument, the Hanford Site, and the 

20 Columbia River. 

21 (5) Public access to Rattlesnake Mountain will 

22 increase tourism interest in the Monument and will 

23 provide economic benefits to local governments. 
3 

•HR 2719 EH

1 SEC. 3. ENSURING PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE SUMMIT OF 

2 RATTLESNAKE MOUNTAIN IN THE HANFORD 

3 REACH NATIONAL MONUMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

5 provide public access to the summit of Rattlesnake Moun6 tain in the Hanford Reach National Monument for edu7 cational, recreational, historical, scientific, cultural, and 

8 other purposes, including— 

9 (1) motor vehicle access; and 

10 (2) pedestrian and other nonmotorized access. 

11 (b) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary of 

12 the Interior may enter into cooperative agreements to fa13 cilitate access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain— 

14 (1) with the Secretary of Energy, the State of 

15 Washington, or any local government agency or 

16 other interested persons, for guided tours, including 

17 guided motorized tours to the summit of Rattlesnake 

18 Mountain; and 

19 (2) with the Secretary of Energy, and with the 

20 State of Washington or any local government agency 
4 

•HR 2719 EH

1 or other interested persons, to maintain the access 

2 road to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 15, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2719 

AN ACT 

To ensure public access to the summit of Rattleical, scientific, cultural, and other purposes. Monument for educational, recreational, histor- snake Mountain in the Hanford Reach National