alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,771
<SECURITIES>                                     3,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                       985
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,271
<PP&E>                                           5,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,268
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,588
<SALES>                                            855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,988
<CGS>                                               68
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,899)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Troy David JARRELL, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-5049.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 9, 2008.

Decided: June 23, 2008.

Dennis H. Curry, Spencer, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Karen L. Bleattler, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Troy David Jarrell pled guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (2000), and was sentenced to 84 months imprisonment. He appeals, challenging the inclusion of three state court convictions in his criminal history calculation. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

In the presentence report, Jarrell was assessed a total of eighteen criminal history points, resulting in a Criminal History Category of VI. Of those eighteen points, three were assessed for convictions in May 2004 for attempting to disarm a police officer, fleeing from a police officer, and driving under the influence, third offense. Jarrell objected to the inclusion of these convictions in his criminal history computation, arguing that the state court lacked jurisdiction over the case.

The Supreme Court has held that a defendant in a federal sentencing proceeding has no right to collaterally challenge a prior state court conviction used to enhance his sentence except where the defendant can demonstrate that the prior state conviction was obtained in the absence of appointed counsel. *Custis v. United States,*511 U.S. 485, 496, 114 S.Ct. *2621732, 128 L.Ed.2d 517 (1994). Further, “[t]he general rule regarding prior convictions is clear: in analyzing whether a defendant is a career offender, a district court must count as a predicate conviction a prior state offense that has not been reversed, vacated, or invalidated.” *United States v. Hondo,*366 F.3d 363, 365 (4th Cir.2004).

Here, Jarrell concedes that he was represented by counsel during the 2004 proceedings. Moreover, he has not shown that the convictions were reversed, vacated, or otherwise invalidated. Accordingly, the district court did not err in overruling Jarrell’s objection to the inclusion of the convictions in his criminal history. Therefore, we affirm his sentence.

We dispense with oral argument because ■ the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4048

_____________________________
B ERNARD C ARRAFA , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. James Daniel , Judge

. June 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , W ETHERELL , and M AKAR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee ; Bernard Carrafa, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorn ey General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 24


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

        KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of TEXAS EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY (Company), a
Delaware corporation, acting in its capacity as general partner of TEPPCO
Partners, L.P., does hereby constitute and appoint WILLIAM L. THACKER, CHARLES
H. LEONARD AND JAMES C. RUTH, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney
and agent to do any and all acts and things, and execute any and all
instruments which, with the advise and consent of Counsel, said attorney and
agent may deem necessary or advisable to enable the Company to comply with the
Securities Act of 1934, as Amended, and any rules, regulations, and
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including specifically,
but without limitation thereof, to sign his name as a director and/or officer
of the Company to the Form 10-K Report for TEPPCO Partners, L.P., and to any
instrument or document filed as a part of, or in accordance with, said Form
10-K or Amendment thereto; and the undersigned do hereby ratify and confirm all
that said attorney and agent shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have subscribed these presents this
21st day of February, 1997.


/s/ DENNIS HENDRIX                      /s/ W. L. THACKER
-------------------------------------   -------------------------------------
Dennis Hendrix                          W. L. Thacker


/s/ PAUL M. ANDERSON                    /s/ GEORGE L. MAZANEC
-------------------------------------   -------------------------------------
Paul M. Anderson                        George L. Mazanec


/s/ DONALD H. ANDERSON                  /s/ DERRILL CODY
-------------------------------------   -------------------------------------
Donald H. Anderson                      Derrill Cody


/s/ LEANDER W. JENNINGS                 /s/ CARL D. CLAY
-------------------------------------   -------------------------------------
Leander W. Jennings                     Carl D. Clay


/s/ JOHN P. DesBARRES                   /s/ CHARLES H. LEONARD
-------------------------------------   -------------------------------------
John P. DesBarres                       Charles H. Leonard
                                        Senior Vice President,
                                        CFO & Treasurer
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-60604

Summary Calendar

ABDULALI NURAMOHA MAKNOJIA,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A078 987 637

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Abdulali Nuramoha Maknojia, a native and citizen of India, petitions this

court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

upholding the decision of the immigration judge denying his application for

withholding of removal. Maknojia argues that given his credible testimony and

the documentary evidence depicting the persecution of Muslims by Hindu

extremists, a reasonable person in his circumstance would fear persecution if

returned to India.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 17, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 09-60604 Document: 00511112808 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/17/2010
No. 09-60604

2

We conclude from a review of the record that the BIA’s determination is

supported by substantial evidence, and the record does not compel a conclusion

contrary to the BIA’s denial of withholding of removal. See Eduard v. Ashcroft,

379 F.3d 182, 193 (5th Cir. 2004); Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994);

8 C.F.R. § 208.16(b). Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED.

Case: 09-60604 Document: 00511112808 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/17/2010
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2762 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2762

To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to reauthorize the Overseas 
        Private Investment Corporation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2011

 Mr. Manzullo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to reauthorize the Overseas 
        Private Investment Corporation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Overseas Private Investment 
Corporation Reauthorization Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. ISSUING AUTHORITY.

    Section 235(a)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2195(a)(2)) is amended by striking ``2007'' and inserting ``2015''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Thurmond B. BOWERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-1546.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 12, 2008.

Decided: June 20, 2008.

Robertson H. Wendt, Jr., Law Offices of Robertson Wendt, North Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi, Regional Chief Counsel, Yvette G. Keesee, Deputy Regional Chief Counsel, Thomas S. Inman, Assistant Regional Counsel, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thurmond B. Bowers appeals the magistrate judge’s order upholding the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. *See Bowers v. Astrue,*No. 3:05-cv-03477-JRM (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 The parties consented to referral to a magistrate judge for final disposition under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             715
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                       463
<INVENTORY>                                      4,058
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,040
<PP&E>                                           4,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,939)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,467
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,494
<COMMON>                                        34,468
<OTHER-SE>                                    (25,374)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,634
<SALES>                                         17,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,714
<CGS>                                            8,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (337)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    445
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (80)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                365
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
DBS Industries,  Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-70117) of our report dated March
14, 2001on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, for the years ended  December 31, 2000,  1999 and
1998 and for the period from April 25, 1990 (date of  inception) to December 31,
2000, which report is included in this 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Francisco, California
March 30, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                           2,679
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,930
<INVENTORY>                                     55,551
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,570
<PP&E>                                          18,557
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,329
<BONDS>                                        101,572
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            8,577
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,310
<SALES>                                        284,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               284,487
<CGS>                                          212,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  212,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,486
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,592)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (731)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,861)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (192)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,053)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.70)


</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1

EXHIBIT 23.1 - Consent of Leslie Taylor Associates


                     CONSENT OF LESLIE TAYLOR ASSOCIATES

     We consent to the  reference to our firm and our report  dated  October 11,
2001 as referenced  in the following  sections of Form 10-KSB filed on behalf of
DBS Industries, Inc. for calendar year 2001:

     Risk Factor - The E-SAT  system has  experienced  delays that could Lead to
                   the loss of the E-SAT FCC license

     Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations

     Notes 1 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements

     We are  providing the consent to the company who is relying on us as expert
for purpose of the company's FCC regulatory compliance.

                                                LESLIE TAYLOR ASSOCIATES



                                                /s/ Leslie A. Taylor
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Leslie A. Taylor, Esq.

Bethesda, Maryland
May 16, 2002
| Name                                                                              |   | Place of Incorporation           |   | Ownership                                   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                                                              |   |                             |   |                                        |
| Green Agriculture Holding Corporation  (“Green New Jersey”) |   | New Jersey                       |   | 100% owned by China Green Agriculture, Inc. |
|                                                                              |   |                             |   |                                        |
| Shaanxi TechTeam Jinong Humic Acid Product Co., Ltd. (“Jinong”)       |   | People's Republic of China       |   | 100% owned by Green New Jersey              |
|                                                                              |   |                             |   |                                        |
| Xi’an Jintai Agriculture Technology Development Company                     |   | People's Republic of China       |   | 100% owned by Jinong                        |
|                                                                              |   |                             |   |                                        |
| Xi’an Hu County Yuxing Agriculture Technology Development Co., Ltd.         |   | People’s Republic of China |   | 100% owned by Jinong                        |
|                                                                              |   |                             |   |                                        |
| Beijing Gufeng Chemical Products Co., Ltd. (“Gufeng”)                 |   | People's Republic of China       |   | 100% owned by Jinong                        |
|                                                                              |   |                             |   |                                        |
| Beijing Tianjuyuan Fertilizer Co., Ltd.                                           |   | People's Republic of China       |   | 100% owned by Gufeng                        |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,630
<SECURITIES>                                     8,484
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                       898
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,143
<PP&E>                                           9,988
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,107
<BONDS>                                            114
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,847
<SALES>                                          6,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,155
<CGS>                                              388
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    975
<INCOME-TAX>                                        49
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                926
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       926
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.8







Summary of Compensation Arrangements with Executive Officer


2010 Fiscal Year







Carrie L. Majeski currently serves as the President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Art’s-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. (the “Company”).  The “at-will” employment relationship between Ms. Majeski and the Company is not currently governed by a written employment agreement.  During the 2010 fiscal year, the Company orally agreed to pay Ms. Majeski an annual base salary of $120,000, based on a recommendation by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee that was approved by the Board.







In addition, the Compensation and the Stock Option Committee recommended, and the Board determined, that Ms. Majeski would be eligible for a discretionary cash bonus following fiscal year end, based on an evaluation of the Company’s year-end financial statements, and in accordance with a recommendation by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee.