alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19857]



[[Page 43778]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Behavior Interventions 
for Prevention Opioid Use Disorders or Adjunct to Medication 
Assisted Treatment-SAMHSA Opioid STR Grants (R21/R33).
    Date: December 6, 2017.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Yisong Wang, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, NCCIH/NIH, Division of Extramural 
Activities, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20817, 
301-480-9483, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#641d0d170b0a034a13050a03240a0d0c4a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dda4b4aeb2b3baf3aabcb3ba9db3b4b5f3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Integrative Health, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 13, 2017.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-19857 Filed 9-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
sc13d0111defeudisex10i_wiki.htm


 


 


 


Exhibit 10.1


 


 


Joint Filing Consent







Pursuant to Rule 13d-1(k)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we hereby consent to file a joint Schedule 13D by and on behalf of each of us dated February 10, 2010.




 




	 	EDWARD C. DEFEUDIS	 	 	SPIDER INVESTMENTS, LLC	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Edward C. DeFeudis	 	By:	/s/ Edward C. DeFeudis	 
	 	 	 	 	
Name: Edward C. DeFeudis

	 
	 	 	 	 	
Title: President
Exhibit 10.18



 EXHIBIT 10.18 
 FIRST 
 AMENDMENT 

TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This amendment (“Amendment”), dated as of July 1, 2010, shall amend the employment agreement dated as of December 10, 2010, by and between Discovery Communications, LLC
(“Company”) and Peter Liguori (“Executive”) (the “Employment Agreement”). 
 WHEREAS, Executive
and the Company previously entered into the Employment Agreement, which sets forth the terms and conditions of Executive’s employment with the Company; 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to make certain changes, as described below. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth in this Amendment, the parties hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Duties, Acceptance, and Location: Section I(C) is hereby amended to add the following sentence: 


“For the period from July 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010, Executive’s primary office location shall be the
Company’s offices in Los Angeles, California.” 
  

	 	2.	Relocation and Transition Benefits. Exhibit A is hereby amended to add a new final bullet point as follows: 


“In addition, for the period from July 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010, while Executive’s primary office location
is in Los Angeles, California, the Company shall reimburse Executive for the cost of his apartment in Washington, DC, in an amount not to exceed $5200 per month.” 
  

	 	3.	Effect on Employment Agreement: Except with respect to the subject matters covered herein, this Amendment does not otherwise amend, supplement, modify, or
terminate the Employment Agreement, which remains in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date set forth above. 
  

					
	EXECUTIVE:	 	 	 	DATE:
			
	     /s/ Peter Liguori
	 		 	    9/22/10                    
	Peter Liguori	 		 	









							
	 Discovery Communications, LLC
	 	 	 	 DATE:

			
	     /s/ Adria Alpert Romm
	 		 	    10/26/2010                    
				
	Name:	 	     Adria Alpert Romm
	 		 	
				
	Title:	 	   SEVP, HR
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2777 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2777

  To authorize and request the President to award the Medal of Honor 
  posthumously to Private First Class William P. Fesken of the United 
         States Army for acts of valor during the Vietnam War.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2011

  Mr. Sires introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize and request the President to award the Medal of Honor 
  posthumously to Private First Class William P. Fesken of the United 
         States Army for acts of valor during the Vietnam War.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION AND REQUEST FOR AWARD OF MEDAL OF HONOR TO 
              WILLIAM P. FESKEN FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE VIETNAM 
              WAR.

    (a) Authorization.--Notwithstanding the time limitations specified 
in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time 
limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons 
who served in the Armed Forces, the President is authorized and 
requested to award the Medal of Honor posthumously under section 3741 
of such title to former Private First Class William P. Fesken of the 
United States Army for the acts of valor during the Vietnam War 
described in subsection (b).
    (b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to in 
subsection (a) are the actions of then Private First Class William P. 
Fesken who, while serving with Company A, 3d Battalion, 47th Infantry, 
9th Infantry Division, distinguished himself conspicuously by gallantry 
and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of 
duty on May 2, 1967, while protecting wounded members of his squad 
during repeated attacks by a Viet Cong force until his death on that 
date.
                                 <all>
```
#### CONTINENTAL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SCRANTON STORAGE BATTERY CORP., Defendant.

Civ. No. 6204.

United States District Court M. D. Pennsylvania.

June 12, 1958.

Joseph Gallagher, Scranton, Pa., for plaintiff.

*100Emanuel Laster, Scranton, Pa., for defendant.

WATSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed a motion asking leave of the Court to file an amended complaint in this action. Defendant opposed plaintiff’s motion and requested the Court to deny it.

Plaintiff- instituted this action to recover-a sum of money deposited with defendant to ensure performance under a written agreement between the parties. Defendant answered plaintiff’s complaint and, by way of counter-claim, demanded judgment against the plaintiff in an amount in excess of plaintiff’s demand. Plaintiff’s attorney filed an affidavit in support of his motion to amend in which he stated, inter alia, that the motion to amend was decided upon after correspondence with the president of plaintiff corporation revealed that plaintiff had other claims for damages against the defendant which were not in the original complaint. Defendant contends that the allowance of the motion to amend will prejudice his position.

Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., under which this motion was filed, provides that leave to amend be freely given when justice so requires. Rule 15 was promul-' gated to give effect to the principle that' cases should be decided on their merits' and not on technicalities. Copeland Motor Co. v. General Motors Corp., 5 Cir., 1952, 199 F.2d 566.

 This Court does not feel that defendant’s position will be prejudiced should the amendment contained in plaintiff’s motion be allowed. It may be that the defendant in any action, when a plaintiff is allowed to amend a complaint, will be obliged to go to some additional time and expense in order to answer the amended complaint. However, where the plaintiff is acting in good faith, is not acting for purposes of delay, and the adverse party will not be prejudiced by the allowance of the amended pleading, then the Court will grant such motion to amend. See Donohue v. New York Life Ins. Co., D.C.Conn., 9 F.R.D. 669. The Court believes that plaintiff should, in the interest of justice and to expedite the disposition of the instant case, be allowed to amend his complaint as requested. An appropriate order will be filed with this opinion.
Exhibit 10(f)





Exhibit 10(f)




PERFORMANCE BONUS PLAN

SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION





	A.	 	ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. A participant must be salaried and employed
by the Company at the beginning of the new calendar year in order to
participate in the Company Salaried Performance Bonus Plan (the
“Plan”). Employees compensated under other incentive programs may be
excluded from the Plan.

	 
	B.	 	BONUS CALCULATION. A participant’s bonus is calculated as follows
[(Participant’s Percentage “PP”)(Bonus Pool “BP”) = Participant’s
Bonus Amount]:







	 	1.	 	The participant’s base percentage of the bonus pool is determined at the beginning
of the year. The participant may also be eligible for a portion of any unallocated
percentage. This unallocated portion, called the discretionary percentage, is allocated
after the close of the year based on individual performance and other subjective
standards. The total of the base percentage and the discretionary percentage for each
participant equals the total Participant’s Percentage “PP”.

	 
	 	2.	 	The bonus pool is calculated by multiplying the Pre-Bonus Operating Profit (PBOP)
for the business unit times the bonus rate factor. The bonus rate factor is determined by
the Pre-Bonus Return on Investment (PBROI) of the business unit.

	 
	 	3.	 	The PBROI of a business unit is determined by dividing PBOP, minus income taxes, by
the business unit’s Investment.

	 
	 	4.	 	The bonus rate factor is listed on the rate chart for the business unit.







	C.	 	BONUS LIMITATIONS. If the calculated bonus for a participant exceeds the participant’s base
salary, the maximum amount of bonus the participant may receive is limited to 1.75 times his
or her current base salary.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43845-43846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FDA-2016-C-2570]


Listing of Color Additives Exempt From Certification; Spirulina 
Extract; Confirmation of Effective Date

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is confirming the 
effective date of August 3, 2017, for the final rule that appeared in 
the Federal Register of July 3, 2017, and that amended the color 
additive regulations to provide for the expanded safe use of spirulina 
extract to seasonally color hard-boiled shell eggs at levels consistent 
with good manufacturing practice.

DATES: Effective date of final rule published in the Federal Register 
of July 3, 2017 (82 FR 30731), confirmed: August 3, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Molly A. Harry, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., 
College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-1075.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of July 3, 2017 (82 
FR 30731), we amended the color additive regulations in Sec.  73.530 
Spirulina extract (21 CFR 73.530) to provide for the expanded safe use 
of spirulina extract to seasonally color the shells of hard-boiled 
eggs.
    We gave interested persons until August 2, 2017, to file objections 
or requests for a hearing. We received no objections or requests for a 
hearing on the final rule. Therefore, we find that the effective date 
of the final rule that published in the Federal Register of July 3, 
2017, should be confirmed.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 73

    Color additives, Cosmetics, Drugs, Medical devices.

0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
321, 341, 342, 343, 348, 351, 352, 355, 361, 362, 371, 379e) and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, we are 
giving notice that no objections or requests for a hearing were filed 
in response to the July 3, 2017, final rule. Accordingly, the 
amendments issued thereby became effective August 3, 2017.


[[Page 43846]]


    Dated: September 14, 2017.
Anna K. Abram,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning, Legislation, and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2017-20050 Filed 9-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         318,171
<SECURITIES>                                    30,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     94,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,081,498
<PP&E>                                       3,624,645
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,084,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,247,869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,760,504
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  7,550,000
<COMMON>                                        78,658
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,904,416)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,247,869
<SALES>                                        234,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               234,006
<CGS>                                          416,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,090,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,088
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,315,208
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,315,208
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,315,208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2429 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2429

To exempt certain class A CDL drivers from the requirement to obtain a 
hazardous material endorsement while operating a service vehicle with a 
  fuel tank containing 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less of diesel 
                                 fuel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 6, 2011

Mr. Neugebauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To exempt certain class A CDL drivers from the requirement to obtain a 
hazardous material endorsement while operating a service vehicle with a 
  fuel tank containing 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less of diesel 
                                 fuel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ENDORSEMENT EXEMPTION.

    (a) Exclusion.--Section 5117(d)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) a service vehicle carrying diesel fuel in 
                quantities of 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less that 
                is--
                            ``(i) driven by a class A commercial 
                        driver's license holder who is a custom 
                        harvester, an agricultural retailer, an 
                        agricultural business employee, an agricultural 
                        cooperative employee, or an agricultural 
                        producer; and
                            ``(ii) clearly marked with a placard 
                        reading `Diesel Fuel'.''.
    (b) Exemption.--Section 31315(b) of title 49, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) Hazardous materials endorsement exemption.--The 
        Secretary shall exempt all class A commercial driver's license 
        holders who are custom harvesters, agricultural retailers, 
        agricultural business employees, agricultural cooperative 
        employees, or agricultural producers from the requirement to 
        obtain a hazardous material endorsement under part 383 of title 
        49, Code of Federal Regulations, while operating a service 
        vehicle carrying diesel fuel in quantities of 3,785 liters 
        (1,000 gallons) or less if the tank containing such fuel is 
        clearly marked with a placard reading `Diesel Fuel'.''.
                                 <all>
```
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor 

550 South Tryon Street 

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2013, by and among RBS COMMERCIAL FUNDING INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer and Co-op Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC., as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series WFRBS 2013-C15 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

   

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

                                                                        

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober 

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President                  

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far

  |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50447 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RODOLFO MARQUEZ-CARREON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-1682-ALL-DB

-------------------- August 22, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rodolfo Marquez-Carreon appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of attempting to illegally reenter the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Marquez-Carreon complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his prior deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. He argues that the sentencingNo. 02-50447 -2- provision violates the Due Process Clause. Alternatively, Marquez-Carreon contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Marquez-Carreon acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.