alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12(a)**
**302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Andrew Cosslett, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the company,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 3, 2005 By:  /s/ Andrew Cosslett    Name:  Andrew Cosslett    Title:  Director and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2734 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2734

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for the participation 
 of the territories in Federal-aid highway discretionary programs, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2011

   Ms. Bordallo (for herself, Mr. Sablan, Mrs. Christensen, and Mr. 
Faleomavaega) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for the participation 
 of the territories in Federal-aid highway discretionary programs, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Territories Economic Development 
Opportunity Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PARTICIPATION OF TERRITORIES IN DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS.

    Section 215 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(h) Participation of Territories in Discretionary Programs.--In 
addition to the assistance made available under this section, under any 
program in which the Secretary may allocate funds out of the Highway 
Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Fund) to a State at the 
discretion of the Secretary, the Secretary may allocate funds to one or 
more territory for any project or activity that otherwise would be 
eligible under such program if such project or activity was being 
carried out in a State.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2770 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend for 3 years 

reasonable cost contracts under Medicare. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2011 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself and Mr. KIND) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend 

for 3 years reasonable cost contracts under Medicare. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Cost Con5 tract Extension Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. 3-YEAR EXTENSION OF MEDICARE REASONABLE 

7 COST CONTRACTS. 

8 Section 1876(h)(5)(C)(ii) of the Social Security Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 1395mm(h)(5)(C)(ii)) is amended, in the matVerDate Mar 15 2010 05:40 Aug 03, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2770.IH H2770

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2770 IH

1 ter preceding subclause (I), by striking ‘‘January 1, 2013’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2016’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RODNEY LEE MOORE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 223 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
EX-35.2


(logo) LNR
Partners, LLC


ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC


The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the
"Special Servicer"), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and
Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule II hereto, hereby
certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule II hereto, as of the
date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an
authorized officer of the Special Serivcer and not in his individual capacity,
as follows:

1.  A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the
period commencing on January 1, 2013 and ending on December 31, 2013 (or any
other shorter period set forth on Schedule II hereto)(the "Reporting Period"),
and of the Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable
servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing
Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


LNR PARTNERS, LLC,
a Florida limited liability company

By: /s/ Job Warshaw
        Job Warshaw
        President


Dated: February 28, 2014


1601 Washington Avenue * Suite 700 * Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164
Telephone: (305) 695-5600 * Fax: (305) 695-5601


(page)


Schedule II

Transaction                                   Certificate Restrictions (if any)
COMM 2013-CCRE10 Mortgage Trust Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Exhibit 12.1  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Andrea Guerra, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Luxottica Group S.p.A.;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  By:
/s/ ANDREA GUERRAAndrea GuerraChief Executive OfficerDated: April 29,   2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                     
<ARTICLE>                                      5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             5928000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       508000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         26000
<INVENTORY>                                         423000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   6958000
<PP&E>                                            23829000
<DEPRECIATION>                                     2483000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    29601000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2823000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             11000
<OTHER-SE>                                        18972000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      29601000
<SALES>                                             662000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    662000
<CGS>                                              3770000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      3770000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   5806000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  354000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (9268000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          1000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (9269000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (9269000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.86)
        

</TABLE>
QUARTERING SOLDIERS

THIRD AMENDMENT

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house,

without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a

manner to be prescribed by law.

IN GENERAL

There has been no Supreme Court explication of this Amendment, which was obviously one guarantee indicating a preference

for the civilian over the military.1

1 In fact, save for the curious case of Engblom v. Carey, 677 F.2d 957 (2d Cir.

1982), on remand, 572 F. Supp. 44 (S.D.N.Y. 1983), aff’d per curiam, 724 F.2d 28 (2d

Cir. 1983), there has been no judicial explication of the Amendment at all.

1367
r

Effe-TA1111, 

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

KARNELIUS COLEMAN

NO. 2024 KW 0129

MARCH 22, 2024

In Re: Karnelius Coleman, applying for supervisory writs, 

22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, 

No. 4373- F- 2023. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to set

forth any of the four factors for showing that he has been

deprived of his constitutional right to a

speedy trial. See

Barker v. Winger, 407 U. S. 514, 530, 92 S. Ct. 2182, 2192, 33

L. Ed. 2d 101 ( 1972). Furthermore, relator failed to include a

copy of the indictment, the pertinent court minutes, and he

failed to include with the motion for speedy trial an affidavit

executed by his counsel certifying that relator and counsel are

prepared to proceed to trial within the applicable time delays. 

See La. Code Crim. P. art. 701 ( D) ( 1) . Supplementation of this

writ application and/ or an application for rehearing will not be

considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, 

Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. Any future filing on this issue should

include the entire contents of this application, the missing

items noted above, and a copy of this ruling. 

PMC

CHH

SMM

OURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

UTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Martin Ramon VILLARREAL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-10400

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 9, 2008.

Christopher R. Wolfe, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John R. Wright, Wright & Associates, Grand Prairie, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Martin Ramon Villarreal appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty-plea conviction for aiding and abetting the possession with the intent to distribute cocaine. Villarreal argues that the district court erred by denying him a downward adjustment under the safety-valve provision of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. Our review is for clear error. *See United States v. Edwards,*65 F.3d 430, 433 (5th Cir.1995).

Villarreal’s assertion that he was denied the reduction based solely on the Government’s assertion that it did not believe him when he claimed to have limited knowledge of the transaction is without merit. The district court’s determination that Villarreal had not truthfully provided the' Government with all relevant information *715concerning the offense was based on the testimony of Special Agent Jerry Cedillo, who in turn, had investigated the case and interviewed both Villarreal and Mario Saldua. Villarreal’s contention that Saldua’s testimony was unreliable also is without merit. Saldua was not granted immunity. Further, the court’s decision to credit Agent Cedillo’s testimony was not clearly erroneous. *See United States v. Gillyard,*261 F.3d 506, 509 (5th Cir.2001).

Citing *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Villarreal also argues that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by denying him the safety-valve adjustment without setting forth its reasons for doing so. Villarreal’s argument fails as a matter of fact because the district court did set forth its reasons for denying the adjustment. Further, in *Apprendi,*530 U.S. at 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, the Supreme Court held that only a fact that increases a penalty above the statutory maximum must be afforded Sixth Amendment protection.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10137]

                    Pursuant to the authority vested in me as the Secretary of State under the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), I hereby determine it is reasonably necessary to achieve one or more of the purposes set forth in section 204(b) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 4304(b)) to designate 2001 Connecticut Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20008, which is owned by the Government of the Russian Federation, as a location and facilities for which entry or access is strictly prohibited by all individuals, including but not limited to representatives or employees of the Russian Government and their dependents, without first obtaining written permission from the Department of State's Office of Foreign Missions. Such prohibitions will take effect as of 2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on September 2, 2017.                

As a result, all persons on the said property are required to depart the premises no later than the date and time stated above.

For purposes of this determination, 2001 Connecticut Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20008, includes any buildings and/or improvements thereon and the land ancillary thereto.

Access to the property will be subject to terms and conditions set forth by the Office of Foreign Missions.

Rex W. Tillerson,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2017-20271 Filed 9-21-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-43-P
#### WERTHEIMER et al. v. UNITED STATES.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

December 9, 1896.)

No. 505.

Customs Duties — Classification—Embroidered Cloves.

Gloves, having two rows of single-cord embroidery, between three lines or points of the material, raised up and sewed through and through, are not dutiable, under paragraph 4.58 of the tariff act of 1890, as “embroidered gloves with more than three single strands or cords.”

This was an appeal by Wertheimer & Co. from a decision of the board of general appraisers sustaining the assessment of duties by the collector of the port of JSTew York upon certain embroidered gloves, imported by the appellants.

David Ives Mackey, for plaintiffs.

Henry C. Platt, Asst. U. S. Atty.

WHEELER, District Judge.

Paragraph 158 of the act of 1890 puts an additional duty “on all embroidered gloves with more than three single strands or cords.” The strands or cords referred to are those of the embroidery. Wertheimer v. U. S., 19 C. C. A. 501, 73 Fed. 296. The gloves in question have two rows of single-cord embroidery between three lines or points of the material, raised up and sewed through and through. They have been assessed as *601embroidered with more than three cords; but they do not appear to have even three cords without counting the cords of the points, which are not of the embroidery, any more than any cords upon the gloves are according lo the case referred to above. The decision which affirms this assessment, therefore, appears to be erroneous. Decision of appraisers reversed.
Description of Benefits for Officers



 Exhibit 10.23 
 Officer Benefits 
 Officers of United Continental Holdings, Inc. (“UCH”), United
Air Lines, Inc., and Continental Airlines, Inc. receive certain miscellaneous benefits in addition to those set forth in their employment agreements. The following is a summary of such benefits, which have been approved by the Compensation Committee
of UCH: 
 Life Insurance. All officers (other than Mr. Smisek) receive group variable universal life insurance in an amount equal
to three times their base salary. Mr. Smisek retained a separate life insurance program under his employment agreement. 
 Physical
Exams. The company has made arrangements with certain hospitals to provide company-paid annual comprehensive physical examinations for officers. 
 Health Club Fees. Officers are eligible for reimbursement of certain limited health club membership fees. 
 Financial Planning and Tax Services. Officers receive reimbursement for certain services provided by their choice of a certified financial planner, estate planner or tax attorney/certified tax
accountant. 
 Relocation Assistance. The company adopted a new relocation program in connection with the merger to provide for a
successful and smooth transition for officers who relocate in connection with the merger of United and Continental. The program includes the following primary elements: temporary living assistance; reimbursement of normal and customary closing costs
associated with a home sale; movement of household goods; assistance with a new home purchase and closing costs; a miscellaneous allowance to cover househunting, travel and other expenses; and protection for a loss on sale of a home, if needed. In
addition, officers are eligible for a tax-gross-up with respect to home sales and new home purchases resulting from such relocation.