alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
r 

, 

.’ 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
.- 

i: 
P. Prak wright, nay IO, lss8, Page s 

it WI Lo ll th a t l r o ua ty 8í8ua .r r h il# 

ariving UI automobile bolonglaa to the l ountr 

QII eomtr bluisomr i8 not l l hutfou? rlthla ch. 

mowing of orti.18 -a, anA that ho 6o.a not 

hue k o b tda a l hauffw'r Uoen80. But tb 

roasmiltg W8 that a aounty ea8ls8Jmer la a 

plblio oifiaor, and, thsreioro, not *en omplo3m,, 

l Oxvstlt agent or ia&pwNl8ilt8ontro8~ within 

the e&tory Aotinith. 

In ta 

r 

uoet in&uioothrrolrno 

doubt but thst or lnary oaunty road hada ore 

aployue of rho oouttty. Tarp attention 18 8alG 

aA to the r0u.d 

%I 

Urowel~ ot the wor~*aorvsd”, WQplOyW’ 89 roxa Jut. 10 whiab state8r 

~ri=%ho language oitho iau, how-?, 

th&wrl **uvuxt@ I8 weA to rpbaeu0 

all l la88ea of rgloywa. It l.8 rmo8rmow with 'aploy..', 8inA in01ud.8 a11 

pacut ofuhate~U rUrk or podtfai 

who are aubjeot to th@ Ur#tica UIA 

raatmlotanatherin any4qutwat 

0r &br or bruiD)os.g 

ID S8 o ur l amluslor thst ru8h oount$ 

wp&yeaouoowt~roaAhu~d~rhlko 4rWlm#tmekr
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

h0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

144498(47)

HAROLD BROWN and NORMA BROWN,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 144498

COA: 298994

Ogemaw CC: 08

- 656968

- NH

DAVID BURK, M.D., RICHARD

WACKSMAN, M.D., and BAY EYE CARE

CENTER, PC,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

CHARLES ZENZEN, M.D.,

Defendant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Cour t, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 25, 2012

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          13,848
<SECURITIES>                                     2,722
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                       800
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,835
<PP&E>                                          11,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,514
<BONDS>                                            212
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,751
<SALES>                                         24,747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,345
<CGS>                                            1,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,533
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                        97
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,298
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,298
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
#### Jericho Water District, Respondent, v One Call Users Council, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Submitted March 10, 2008;

decided March 13, 2008

Motion to strike portions of respondent’s brief denied.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

BlueIce Engineering, LLC ) ASBCA No. 62679

)

Under Contract No. N40192-19-P-7102 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Bryan B. Arnold, Esq.

 Gordee, Nowicki & Blankeney LLP

 Irvine, CA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

 Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Jerry Kim, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: October 6, 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62679, Appeal of BlueIce 

Engineering, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 7, 2021 

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco PENA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-30066.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 2007.*

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

John C. Laing, Esq, Stephen F. Peifer, Esq, USPO-Office of the U.S. Attorney Mark 0. Hatfield U.S. Courthouse, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert M. Stone, Esq, Medford, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Francisco Pena-Hernandez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 87-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Pena-Hernandez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Because Pena-Hernandez knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. *See United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, appellant’s pro se motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

MELVIN PATRICK, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 20

- 1371

[ October 8, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 5 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Edward H. Merrigan,
Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No. 16

- 8733

- CF

- 10A

.
Melvin Patrick, Clermont, pro se

.
No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

W ARNER , M AY and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the quarterly  report of LaSalle  Brands  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended March 31, 2007,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Scott  Campbell,  certify  to the best of my  knowledge,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Scott Campbell
---------------------------
Scott Campbell, President & CFO
August 28, 2007
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

mnorable HuivhyCole CountyAuditor Wberty County tiberty, Texar

Your request f fully oonsidered by th,ts quert 88 t011ovst quote from your cb-

%nder date of 0, in oplnlon ml county, you sslonEmt’ court

ridgeis a lioenaed attorve pFactlci of lav and does, resent the County in all vauld the Cotiasfonersi Court be employ said Comty Judge 88 coumel he County in suits i’Lled a&n& the ehalf of the Countywhere the jurisCounty Coqt vould not be involved?” Article 19~~8, reads 8s follom t Veernonls Annotated Texas Civil Statutes,

“The county judge hall, before entering upon the duties of his office,‘execute a bond payable to the treasurer of his county to be approved by the oomLlsslon6rs court of his county, in a sumof .:_: .,.,p gonorable MurphyCole, PageQ

not lens than omthousrnd not mor4than ten thou- .sand dollars, the mount to be fixed by the commIssloners Court, conditioned that he vi11 pay over to the person or oliicsr antItIled to receive It, all moneysthat nuy oonn into his hands a4 oounty

‘ judge, and that he vi11 pay over to his county all moneysIllegally paid to himout of aounty funds, as voluntary paynasntror othervise, andthat he rlll not vote or give his consent to pay out oounty fund8 exoept ror lavful purpos~s.~ Artlole 2340, Vernon*8Annotated Texas Civil Statute;, WS~Sa8 r0iittwt

./-- “Before entering uponthe duties of their offloe, the county judge and eaoh oomIsslon4r shall Wee the,ofl’Ioirl oath, and shall also take a vrU.- ten oath that he vi11 not be dlreotly or IndIrectly interested In any contract vlth, or claim against, the county in whioh he re4Ides;except such varrants aa mayIssue to himas Se48of ’ offIa4. Eachcormnisslonsr shall execute 8bond to be approved by the oouuty judge in the sumof three thousand dollars, payable to the county treasurer, conditioned Par the faithful performme of the duties of his office, that he will pay over to his county all money8 Illegally paid to him out of county funds, as Voluntary paynmntsor othervise, and that he vi11 not vote or give his consent to pay out oounty tunds ero4pt ror lavrul purposes.4 This department held, In an opinion vrltten by Eonorable V.I. Kesllng, Assistant Attorney General, datsd P&larch 1, 1913, and printed In lgl2-1914 Reportsi!oi the attorney General OfTexas, pages 119-120, that a aontract betvesn the oountp judg4 and the commi4sIoners* court of Tarrant Countyallowing thecounty judge comznIseIon4for the sale of countg bond4vas vlolatIv4 of the ‘oounty~judge~s oath vhlch provided that the 4Ountyjudge “~111 not be directly or Indirectly Interested In 44 contract mith or claim against the county In vhich he re4id44, 4xa4pt such warrants as my 143~4 to himas fees of 

## ottice.n The opinion also held the contraot void 6s contrary tolound public polioy./^- Eonorable MurphyCole, Page 3

Ye think the above holdlng i8 correot and ve approw srme.

It I4 the apInIon OSthis department that the proposed employment voufd be vlolatlvs of the county Judge’s oath of offlco and aleo contrary to sound public policy. Tour question la therefore ansuered In the negative.

, Very truly yours c

VJFlAN / ‘ lint.J. Fantllng Assistant

. .
Exhibit 23

                     SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.
                        CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

                               63 PINE STREET
                   WEST PEABODY, MASSACHUSETTS 01960-3635
                          TELEPHONE (978) 535-0206
                          FACSIMILE (978) 535-9908

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Slade's Ferry Bancorp of our report dated January 23, 2001.

                                     /s/ SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.
                                         SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.

West Peabody, Massachusetts
March 5, 2001
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40525 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
WILFREDO YSAEL BARRIOS

- CINTO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15

- CR

- 1292

- 1

Before JOLLY , HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Wilfredo Ysael
Barrios

- Cinto has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Barrios

- Cinto h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40525 Document: 00514122358 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017No. 16

- 40525

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40525 Document: 00514122358 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
Seventh Amendment to 2003 Stock and Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.26 
 SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO 
 MATADOR RESOURCES COMPANY 

2003 STOCK AND INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The Board of Directors of Matador Resources Company, a Texas corporation (the “Company”), at a meeting duly called and held on December 12, 2011, has adopted and approved the
following amendment to the Matador Resources Company 2003 Stock and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”): 

Section 2.6 of the Plan shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows: 

“Section 2.6. Exercise of Options. An Option may be exercised in whole or in part to the extent exercisable in
accordance with Section 2.4 and the option agreement. An Option shall be deemed exercised when (i) the Company has received written notice of such exercise in accordance with the terms of the Option and (ii) full payment of the
aggregate exercise price of the Shares as to which the Option is exercised has been made. Unless further limited by the Committee in any Option, the exercise price of any Shares purchased may be paid: (a) in cash, (b) by certified or
cashier’s check, (c) by money order, (d) by personal check, (e) with Shares owned by the Optionee for at least six months, (f) by delivery (including by FAX) to the Company or its designated agent of an executed irrevocable
option exercise form together with irrevocable instructions from the Participant to a broker or dealer, reasonably acceptable to the Company, to sell certain of the Shares purchased upon exercise of the Option or to pledge such Shares as collateral
for a loan and promptly deliver to the Company the amount of sale or loan proceeds necessary to pay such purchase price, or (g) by a combination of the foregoing. If the exercise price is paid in whole or in part with Shares, the value of the
Shares surrendered shall be their Fair Market Value on the date received by the Company.” 
 The Plan, as amended hereby,
shall continue in full force and effect. 
 No other approval by the Company or its shareholders is necessary for this amendment. 

ADOPTED BY THE BOARD: December 12, 2011
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 40185, 40186 & 40187

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

TYLER JERMANE OWENS,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 528

Filed: June 7, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin 

Falls County. Hon. Randy J. Stoker, District Judge. 

Appeals from orders denying I.C.R. 35 motions for reduction of sentences, 

dismissed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Sally J. Cooley, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

In Docket No. 40185, Tyler Jermane Owens pled guilty to one count of forgery, I.C. § 

18-3601, and one count of burglary, I.C. §§ 18-1401 and 18-1403. In Docket No. 40186, Owens 

pled guilty to one count of burglary. In Docket No. 40187, Owens pled guilty to one count of 

burglary. In exchange for his guilty pleas, additional charges were dismissed and the state 

agreed not to pursue an allegation that Owens was a persistent violator. According to the terms 

of the plea agreement entered into between the parties, Owens waived his right to appeal his 

sentences unless the district court exceeded the agreed-to sentencing recommendations and 

waived his right to file I.C.R. 35 motions. The district court followed the terms of the plea 

agreement and sentenced Owens to concurrent terms of six years, with minimum periods of 
2

confinement of two years, for forgery and burglary; a concurrent unified term of seven years, 

with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for burglary; and a unified term of seven 

years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for burglary. The district court 

retained jurisdiction, but thereafter relinquished jurisdiction. Owens filed I.C.R 35 motions for 

reduction of his sentences, which the district court denied. Owens appeals.

We hold that Owens’s appellate challenges to the excessiveness of his sentences has been 

waived by his plea agreement. See I.C.R. 11(f)(1); State v. Rodriguez, 142 Idaho 786, 787, 133 

P.3d 1251, 1252 (Ct. App. 2006). Owens’s plea agreement contained a clause by which Owens 

waived his right to appeal his sentences and his right to file Rule 35 motions. Accordingly, we 

dismiss Owens’s appeals.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E.
Kevin Hrusovsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 9, 2004

                                                         /s/ E. Kevin Hrusovsky
                                                     --------------------------
                                                             E. Kevin Hrusovsky
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Caliper's under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
{00040405.DOC;2}SF1 1652475v.2**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2013-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports"); 2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  U.S. Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee. Date:  March 23, 2015   /s/ Brian T. Stevens Name: Brian T. Stevens Title:   Vice President and Controller                             (senior officer of Servicer in charge of servicing function)