alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                              47
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,394
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,074
<PP&E>                                          49,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,956
<BONDS>                                         21,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,683
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,198
<SALES>                                          8,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,326
<CGS>                                            5,449
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    564
<INCOME-TAX>                                       237
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                        2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Mary Lynn D. Lenz, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Slade's Ferry Bancorp. (the "Company"). This statement is being
furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
(the "Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
            U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
            covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




August 15, 2005                        /s/ Mary Lynn D. Lenz
---------------                        ---------------------
(Date)                                 (Signature) Mary Lynn D. Lenz
                                                   President/
                                                   Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2528 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2528

To rescind the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to develop a 
                        return-free tax system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 2011

Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself and Mr. Reichert) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To rescind the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to develop a 
                        return-free tax system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taxpayer Freedom to File Protection 
Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF AUTHORITY TO DEVELOP RETURN-FREE TAX SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury may not develop or 
implement a return-free tax system.
    (b) Repeal of Prior Authority.--Section 2004 of the Internal 
Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2355 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to exclude individuals who have 

been convicted of committing certain sex offenses from receiving certain 

burial-related benefits and funeral honors which are otherwise available 

to certain veterans, members of the Armed Forces, and related individuals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2011 

Mrs. HARTZLER (for herself, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. 

KISSELL, Mr. LATTA, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. FORBES, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. DENHAM, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. 

BOUSTANY, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, Mr. STUTZMAN, Mr. GOWDY, Mr. 

PITTS, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. BROOKS, Mr. HANNA, Mr. TERRY, 

Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. POMPEO, Mr. FLORES, 

Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. CARTER, Mr. THORNBERRY, 

Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mrs. ELLMERS, Mr. NUNNELEE, Ms. 

GRANGER, Mr. MACK, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. JORDAN, and 

Mr. AKIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 

Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to exclude individuals 

who have been convicted of committing certain sex offenses from receiving certain burial-related benefits and 

funeral honors which are otherwise available to certain 

veterans, members of the Armed Forces, and related 

individuals, and for other purposes. 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2355 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hallowed Grounds 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF PERSONS CONVICTED OF COMMIT7 TING CERTAIN SEX OFFENSES FROM INTER8 MENT OR MEMORIALIZATION IN NATIONAL 

9 CEMETERIES, ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEME10 TERY, AND CERTAIN STATE VETERANS’ 

11 CEMETERIES AND FROM RECEIVING CER12 TAIN FUNERAL HONORS. 

13 (a) PROHIBITION AGAINST.—Section 2411(b) of title 

14 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

15 the following new paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(4) A person who is a tier III sex offender for 

17 purposes of the Sex Offender Registration and Noti18 fication Act.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to interments and 

21 memorializations that occur on or after the date of the 

22 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2729 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2729

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to extend to physician 
assistants eligibility for Medicaid incentive payments for the adoption 
  and use of certified electronic health records, whether or not such 
  physician assistants practice at a rural health center or Federally 
                        qualified health center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2011

   Ms. Bass of California (for herself and Mr. Terry) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to extend to physician 
assistants eligibility for Medicaid incentive payments for the adoption 
  and use of certified electronic health records, whether or not such 
  physician assistants practice at a rural health center or Federally 
                        qualified health center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health IT Modernization for 
Underserved Communities Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. EXTENDING PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT ELIGIBILITY FOR MEDICAID 
              ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD INCENTIVE PAYMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1902(t)(3)(B)(v) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(t)(3)(B)(v)) is amended by striking ``insofar as 
the assistant is practicing in a rural health clinic that is led by a 
physician assistant or is practicing in a Federally qualified health 
center that is so led''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to payments made for calendar quarters beginning on 
the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2544 

To increase the statutory limit on the public debt, increase job creation, 

and reduce projected medium and long-term Federal budget deficits 

and debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2011 

Ms. MCCOLLUM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To increase the statutory limit on the public debt, increase 

job creation, and reduce projected medium and longterm Federal budget deficits and debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Don’t Default on 

5 America’s Debts and Destroy American Jobs Act of 

6 2011’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2544 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN STATUTORY LIMIT ON THE PUBLIC 

2 DEBT. 

3 Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United 

4 States Code, is amended by striking out the dollar limita5 tion contained in such subsection and inserting in lieu 

6 thereof ‘‘$16,700,000,000,000’’. 

7 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

8 It is the sense of Congress that the Congressional re9 cess scheduled for August 2011 should be cancelled and 

10 that Congress should remain in official session until legis11 lation is passed to— 

12 (1) increase job creation and reduce unemploy13 ment; and 

14 (2) reduce projected medium- and long-term 

15 Federal budget deficits and debt. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Rel: October 4, 2024

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

THE SUPREME COURT

SPECIAL TERM, 2024

SC-2024-0223

Steven Mark Hayden v. Josh Sexton; Kayla Sexton; Luke Sexton; Troy 

Hospital Staffing, LLC; Troy Healthcare Authority d/b/a Troy Regional 

Medical Center; and Emergency Staffing Solutions Inc. (Appeal from 

Pike Circuit Court: CV-22-900033).

SHAW, Acting Chief Justice.*

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P.

Sellers, Mendheim, Stewart, and Cook, JJ., and Windom and 

McCool, Special Justices,* concur.

Parker, C.J., and Wise, Bryan, and Mitchell, JJ., recuse themselves.

*Because four members of the Supreme Court, including the Chief 

Justice, recused themselves, on September 25, 2024, Acting Chief Justice 

Shaw appointed Presiding Judge Mary Becker Windom and Judge J. 

Chris McCool, of the Court of Criminal Appeals, to serve as Special 

Justices in this appeal.
PD-0251-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 3/5/2015 11:45:43 AM

Accepted 3/6/2015 3:11:20 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

CHAD LANDRY KITTLES , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3265

[ February 21, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Marina Garcia

- Wood

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 93

- 21770CF10A and 94

- 0 4138CF10A

.
Chad Landry Kittles, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

No a ppearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

W ARNER , L EVINE and C ONNER , JJ., concu r.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON APPELLANT’S

MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Ivan Villarreal v. Texas Southern University; Dannye Holley, in his 

Individual & Official Capacities; Edward Maldonado (A/K/A SpearIt), 

in his Individual & Personal Capacities; Gabriel Aitsebaomo, in his 

Individual & Personal Capacities

Appellate case number: 01-17-00867-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-64945

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: February 14, 2019

Party filing motion: Appellees, Texas Southern University; Dannye Holley, in his 

Individual & Official Capacities; Edward Maldonado (A/K/A SpearIt), 

in his Individual & Personal Capacities; Gabriel Aitsebaomo, in his 

Individual & Personal Capacities

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ ___Richard Hightower___________________________________ 

 Acting Individually Acting for the Court

En banc court consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Higley, Lloyd, Goodman, 

Hightower, and Countiss.

Justices Kelly and Landau not sitting.

Date: April 25, 2019
Exhibit 23.1

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-208579) pertaining to the Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan of our report dated March 24, 2016 (except for the third paragraph of Note 1, as to which the date is August 9, 2016), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2015.

|   |                  |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   |                  |
|   | /s/ Ernst & Young |
|   |                  |

New York, New York

March 24, 2016, except for the third paragraph of Note 1, as to which the date is August 9, 2016

 

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT A.A., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3587 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 29, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Robert Bauman, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. VILLANTI, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
ex10-3.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 



	AMOUNT:	DATE:





 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED,__________________("Borrower”) hereby promises to pay to the order of «Lender» ("Lender") the principal sum of ______________DOLLARS.  Payment in full, plus accrued interest of three and one quarter (3.25%) percent shall be made in lawful money of the United States, at the principal address of Lender, or such other place as the holder of this Note may designate on November 30, 2011 or upon demand.







Borrower shall have the privilege without premium or penalty, at any time and from time to time, of prepaying this Note in whole or in part.







No partial prepayment shall postpone or interrupt the payment of the remaining principal balance, all of which shall continue to be due and payable at the time and the manner set forth above.







Borrower agrees that a default shall occur hereunder in the event that payment is not made upon demand and such default continues for a period of ten (10) days from the date of demand therefor.  After the expiration of such ten (10) day period interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance due hereunder at a rate of twelve (12%) percent, together with attorneys' fees for collection and payment of the same, which sums may be enforced and recovered by the entry of judgment on this.







Borrower (and all endorsers, sureties and guarantors) waives presentment for payment, demand, notice of demand, notice of nonpayment or dishonor, protest and notice of protest of this Note, and all other notices in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default, or enforcement of the payment of this Note; liability hereunder shall be unconditional and shall not be affected in any manner by any indulgence, extension of time, renewal, waiver or modification granted or consented to by Lender.







Borrower shall pay the cost of any revenue, tax or other stamps now or hereafter required by law at any time to be affixed to this Note or any security documents executed in conjunction herewith, and if any taxes be imposed with respect to debts secured by any such security documents or with respect to notes evidencing debts so secured Borrower agrees to pay or to reimburse Lender upon demand the amount of such taxes.







The words "Lender" and "Borrower" whenever occurring herein shall be deemed and construed to include their respective successors and assigns of Lender and Borrower.







This instrument shall be construed according to and governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.









  





Page 1 of 2











  




 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has duly executed this Promissory Note under seal the day and year first above mentioned.


 














	
 

	
BY:

	 	 
	 	 	NAME:	 
	 	 	TITLE:	 





 


 


 




 


 


Page 2 of 2
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0381. LARRY MCGUIRE v. THE STATE.

Larry McGuire appealed his conviction for rape, aggravated sodomy, and

assault. In McGuire v. State, 287 Ga. App. 764 (653 SE2d 101) (2007), we reversed

based upon the trial court’s failure to strike a juror for cause. See id. After the case

wasremanded, McGuire entered a guilty plea.1 On December 18, 2013, the trial court

entered an order denying McGuire’s pro se motion to compel production of his guilty

plea transcript. On April 16, 2015, McGuire filed a two-page application for

discretionary appeal seeking to challenge the validity of his guilty plea.

As a threshold matter, we note there is nothing in McGuire’s application for

discretionary appeal to indicate he challenged the validity of his plea below. Rather,

the only order McGuire included was the December 2013 order denying his request

for a transcript. And McGuire is unable to challenge this order because his

application for discretionary appeal is untimely. An application for discretionary

appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment to be

appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). McGuire, however, filed his application 484 days

after entry of the order he included with his discretionary application. The

requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an

application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga.

App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Accordingly, this application is herebyDISMISSED

for lack of jurisdiction.

1 McGuire pled guilty pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (91

SCt 160, 27 LEd2d 162) (1970), and thereby pled guilty without admitting his guilt.

May 12, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/12/2015
#### William R. SPEARS, Jeff Spears, Eddie Spears, and Bill Weddington, Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORP., Defendant.

Civ. No. 4-83-51.

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Winchester Division.

Aug. 7, 1985.

Robert S. Peters, Winchester, Tenn., Doyle Richardson, Tullahoma, Tenn., for plaintiffs.

*541Ed Schmutzer, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chattanooga, Tenn., for defendant.

ORDER

WISEMAN, Chief Judge, Sitting Specially-

Pursuant to a settlement agreement between the parties, this Court hereby vacates as moot its decision and judgment of February 16, 1984 in this case, 579 F.Supp. 1022. This Order will be published in the Federal Supplement Reporter published by West’s Publishing Company.
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 27 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD ANTHONY BOURIE,

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 97-1343

v. (D. Colorado)

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF COLORADO,

Respondent - Appellee.

(D.C. No. 97-B-1625) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Appellant Richard Anthony Bourie, proceeding pro se, appeals the

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas action, in which he sought relief from a

civil, state personnel “corrective action” he received based on his use of excessive

force in the course of an arrest he made while employed as a police officer by the

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center. The district court held it lacked

jurisdiction to hear a habeas petition based solely on a civil state personnel

proceeding, and dismissed Mr. Bourie’s petition. 

We deny Mr. Bourie’s request for a certificate of appealability and dismiss

his petition for substantially the reasons stated in the district court’s order dated

August 26, 1997.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephen H. Anderson

Circuit Judge