alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




I,
        Donald
        S. Robbins, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CSMG Technologies, Inc. for the quarter
        ended
        September 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”), that the Form 10-Q fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form
        10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of CSMG Technologies, Inc. for the periods covered
        by the
        Form 10-Q.


Dated:
                November 14 , 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Donald S. RobbinsDonald
                S. RobbinsChief
                Executive Officer





I,
      Ken J.
      Hedrick, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CSMG Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”), that the Form 10-Q fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form
      10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of CSMG Technologies, Inc. for the periods covered by
      the
      Form 10-Q.


Dated:
                November 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Ken J. HedrickKen
                J. HedrickChief
                Financial Officer




This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
      Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-KSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 FOR DBS INDUSTRIES, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         383,054
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               502,319
<PP&E>                                          73,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,828     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,785,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          913,504
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,373
<OTHER-SE>                                     872,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,785,543
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,682,277
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             308,094
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,149,717
<INCOME-TAX>                                    80,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,831,994
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,068,917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.5234
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.4922
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTS
 
   
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
Number 33-66826 (dated August 2, 1993 on Form S-8), Number 33-78546 (dated May
2, 1994 on Form S-8), Number 33-71416 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Form
S-1 on Form S-3 dated May 16, 1995), Number 33-95432 (dated August 4, 1995 on
Form S-8), Number 333-1748 (dated March 28, 1996 on Form S-3), Number 333-19471
(dated January 9, 1997 on Form S-3), and File No. 333-33321 (dated August 8,
1997 on Form S-3), of DynaGen, Inc., of our report dated April 14, 1998, which
included an explanatory paragraph about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern, appearing in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K
of DynaGen, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997.
    
 
                                          /s/ Wolf & Company, P.C.
 
Boston, Massachusetts
April 15, 1998
 
                                        2
ex10_5.htm









Exhibit 10.5


SPE Navigation 1, LLC agreement to acquire working interest










 



 Sale of Working Interest Agreement










Agreement is made this 15th day of February 2011 between Strategic American Oil Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Seller” and SPE Navigation 1, LLC and/or its assigns, hereinafter referred to as “Purchaser”, concerning the sale of working interest being acquired by Seller in the purchase of Galveston Bay Energy, LLC, which the Purchase and Sale Agreement is included here by reference. Sellers agree to sell and Purchaser agrees to purchase twenty-five percent (25%) of the working interest being acquired by Seller in the said acquisition under the following terms and conditions:








	 	
1.  

	
Purchaser shall upon signing of this Agreement deliver $1,400,000 to Seller. Purchaser shall be entitled to 15% of the working interest with the delivery of these proceeds.








	 	
2.  

	
Purchaser shall on or before 90 days from this date, deliver another $1,150,000 to Seller. Purchaser shall be entitled to 10% of the working interest with the delivery of these proceeds.














Witness our hands this 15th day of February 2011.







Purchaser


 



	
SPE NAVIGATION, LLC


	 
	
/s/  Michael E. Watts


	
Michael E. Watts, President







 


Seller


 



	
STRATEGIC AMERICAN OIL CORPORATION


	 
	
/s/  Jeremy G. Driver


	
Jeremy G. Driver, President








 


 


Page 1
Exhibit 32.2

      STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                     ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Deborah A. McLaughlin, is the Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Operating Officer of Slade's Ferry Bancorp. (the "Company").  This
statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004 (the "Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
            78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
            covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



March 29,  2005                        /s/ Deborah A. McLaughlin
-------------------------              -------------------------------------
(Date)                                 (Signature)     Deborah A. McLaughlin
                                                    Chief Financial Officer/
                                                    Chief Operations Officer


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE THIRD
QUARTER FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 6/30/99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-25-1999
<CASH>                                           1,564
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,304
<INVENTORY>                                     53,835
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,976
<PP&E>                                          52,307
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,432
<BONDS>                                        156,168
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,421
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,967)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,552
<SALES>                                        118,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,060
<CGS>                                           71,805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,266)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,408)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,858)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (999)
<CHANGES>                                      (1,687)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,544)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.12)
        

</TABLE>
#### Hulse *against*Young.

An auctioneer goods ofathita maintain m*» own name ft?

IN ERROR, on *certiorari*to a Justice’s Court.

The defendant in error brought an action, in the Court below, against the plaintiff in error, for goods sold and delivered. The goods in question were the property of one *2Murray, and were sold by the plaintiff 'helow as an auctioneer. The defendant below objected, that the plaintiff could not maintain the action, and moved for a nonsuit, which the justice denied, and left the cause to the jury, who found a verdict for the plaintiff below.

*Per Curiam.*

The single question is, whether the auctioneer could, in this case, maintain a suit in his own name ; and there can he no doubt that the action well lies. The case of *Williams*v. Millington, (1 *H. Black. Rep.*81.) is a very strong authority in favour of the auctioneer’s right to sue in his own name, though the sale is at the owner’s house, and the goods were known to be his property. Lord *Lough-*borough, Ch. J., held, that the auctioneer had a possession of the goods, coupled with an interest in them, and not a bare custody, like a servant or a shopman, and that it made no difference whether the sale be on the owner’s premises, or in a public auction room; for, in both cases, there is an actual possession by the auctioneer, not merely an authority to Sell. He held, too, that the auctioneer had a special property in him, with a *lien*for the charges of the sale, the commissions, and the auction duty, which he was bound to pay; and that if the goods were delivered without payment, the auctioneer gave credit to the vendee at his own risk; We cannot find that this case has ever been questioned.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2587 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2587

   To prohibit the National Labor Relations Board from ordering any 
     employer to close, relocate, or transfer employment under any 
                             circumstance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2011

    Mr. Scott of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Kline, Mr. Roe of 
Tennessee, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, and Mr. Gowdy) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the National Labor Relations Board from ordering any 
     employer to close, relocate, or transfer employment under any 
                             circumstance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Jobs From Government 
Interference Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF THE NLRB.

    Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 160) 
is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``: 
Provided further, That the Board shall have no power to order an 
employer (or seek an order against an employer) to restore or reinstate 
any work, product, production line, or equipment, to rescind any 
relocation, transfer, subcontracting, outsourcing, or other change 
regarding the location, entity, or persons who shall be engaged in 
production or other business operations, or to require any employer to 
make an initial or additional investment at a particular plant, 
facility, or location.''.

SEC. 3. RETROACTIVITY.

    The Act shall apply to any complaint for which a final adjudication 
by the Board has not been made by the date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000856751
<NAME> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,870
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           9,824
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     76,743
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          23,221
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            22,060
<LOANS>                                        167,530
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 294,241
<DEPOSITS>                                     219,205
<SHORT-TERM>                                    39,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,212
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,948
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,136
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  23,084
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,459
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,944
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   434
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,837
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,363
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,932
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,905
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,250
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (6)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    318
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         318
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       885
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.38
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,352
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,487
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      113
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,624
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,019
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            605
        

</TABLE>
#### Village of Pomona, Appellant, v Town of Ramapo et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 7, 2008;

decided March 13, 2008

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*9 NY3d 981 (2007)].
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FIRST
QUARTER FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 6/30/00 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,432
<ALLOWANCES>                                       939
<INVENTORY>                                     39,725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,235
<PP&E>                                          48,852
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,692
<BONDS>                                        123,745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           40,930
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,779)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,404
<SALES>                                         26,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,723
<CGS>                                           16,326
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,045
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,694
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,342)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,442)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,442)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.91)


</TABLE>
ex10_3.htm



 












Exhibit 10.3











  





  











  








Exhibit 10.3












MDU Resources Group, Inc.


2011 Performance Share Award Opportunity Chart













	  	  	
Threshold

	
Target

	
Maximum


	
Name

	
Title

	
Shares


 


(#)

	
Dividend


Equivalents


($)

	
Shares


 


(#)

	
Dividend


Equivalents


($)

	
Shares


 


(#)

	
Dividend


Equivalents


($)


	
Terry D. Hildestad

	
President and Chief Executive Officer


MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
5,424

	
10,577

	
54,243

	
105,774

	
108,486

	
211,548


	
Doran N. Schwartz

	
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
987

	
1,925

	
9,872

	
19,250

	
19,744

	
38,501


	
John G. Harp

	
President and Chief Executive Officer


MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.

	
1,953

	
3,808

	
19,527

	
38,078

	
39,054

	
76,155


	
William E. Schneider

	
President and Chief Executive Officer


Knife River Corporation

	
1,941

	
3,785

	
19,414

	
37,857

	
38,828

	
75,715


	
Steven L. Bietz

	
President and Chief Executive Officer


WBI Holdings, Inc.

	
1,564

	
3,050

	
15,643

	
30,504

	
31,286

	
61,008
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 14

- 00643

- CV

JOSEPH GLASS AND HIL DEGARD GLASS , Appellant s

V.

MILES GILBERT D/B/A MG SHEET METAL WORKS , Appellee
Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1013437 ).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on May 28, 2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the portion of the trial court’s judgment that granted summary judgment on the breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims . Accordingly, the Court reverses this portion of the trial court’s judgment.

The Court further holds that there was no reversible error in the remaining portions of the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the remaining portions of the trial court’s judgment.

The Court further remands the case to the trial court fo r further proceedings.The Court orders that appellate costs are assessed against each party incurring

same.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered June 25, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown. Opinion delivered by Justice
Bland.