alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1****Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**                       **2003** **2004** **2005** **2006** **2007**  (in thousands)**Earnings**                    Income From Continuing Operations *  104,958   112,658   138,639   158,538   132,701 Fixed Charges  93,294   80,695   93,414   101,905   119,603 Distributed Income ofEquity Investment  28,003   47,213   37,085   63,483   122,900 Capitalized Interest  (5,290)  (4,227)  (6,759)  (10,681)  (11,030)   Total Earnings  220,965   236,339   262,379   313,245   364,174                         **Fixed Charges**                    Interest Expense  84,250   72,053   81,861   86,171   101,223 Capitalized Interest  5,290   4,227   6,759   10,681   11,030 Rental Interest Factor  3,754   4,415   4,794   5,053   7,350    Total Fixed Charges  93,294   80,695   93,414   101,905   119,603                         **Ratio: Earnings / Fixed Charges**  2.37   2.93   2.81   3.07   3.04     * Excludes discontinued operations, gain on sale of assets, provision for taxes and undistributedequity earnings.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

DARAK WILLIAMS,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 875 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 31.1





ICONIX BRAND GROUP,
INC.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR
15D-14 OF


THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





I, Neil Cole, certify
that:





1.           I have reviewed this Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 of Iconix Brand Group,
Inc.;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
coveredby this
report.





Date: April30, 2010





/s/ Neil
    ColeNeil ColePresident and Chief Executive
      Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc; (the Company) on Form 10K for the year
ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Norbert Sporns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 31, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Norbert Sporns     
|Norbert Sporns         
|Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19973]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Special Medical Advisory Group; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act that the Special Medical Advisory Group 
will meet on October 18, 2017, at the Department of Veterans Affairs, 
VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Ave, Washington, DC 20420, Conference 
Room 230 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET. The meeting is open to the 
public.
    The purpose of the Group is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on the care and treatment of 
Veterans, and other matters pertinent to the Veterans Health 
Administration (VHA).
    The agenda for the meeting will include a review of the CARE Plan, 
Health Improvement Center, and a review of the Manchester 
investigation.
    Thirty (30) minutes will be allocated at the end of the meeting for 
receiving oral presentations from the public. Members of the public may 
submit written statements for review by the Committee to Jeff Harp at 
the Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Under Secretary for 
Health (10), Veterans Health Administration, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20420, phone 202-461-7016 or by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8fee9fbe5e9efeceee7e8dec986cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="500611031d111714161f1026317e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting or seeking 
additional information should email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#491f081a04080e0d0f06093f28672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95c3d4c6d8d4d2d1d3dad5e3f4bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>. All persons 
attending the meeting will go through security screening, please bring 
photo I.D. Because the meeting is being held in a government building, 
a photo I.D. must be presented at the Guard's Desk as a part of the 
clearance process. Due to security protocols and to prevent delays in 
clearance processing, you should allow an additional 30 minutes before 
the meeting begins.

    Dated: September 14, 2017.
LaTonya L. Small,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-19973 Filed 9-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7661

ROBERT MCELHANEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JANET RENO, U. S. Attorney General, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-83-3, CR-92-22) Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 21, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert McElhaney, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert McElhaney appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McElhaney v. United States , Nos. CA-98-83-3; CR-92-22(S.D.W. Va. Sept. 25, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2013, by and amongGS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer,TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC., as Operating Advisor and U.S. BANK NATIONALASSOCIATION, Certificate Administrator and Trustee, with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through GSMS Certificates Series 2013-GC13 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.07 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly  report of Creative  Eateries  Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Cheryl
Brock, certify to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Scott Campbell
-----------------------------------------
Scott Campbell, Vice President of Finance
September 14, 2006
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Western Gas Resources, Inc.

|Name of Subsidiary |  | Relationship                        
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|To review          |  |                                     
|1)                 |  | MIGC, Inc.                          
|2)                 |  | MGTC, Inc.                          
|3)                 |  | Western Gas ResourcesTexas, Inc.   
|4)                 |  | Mountain Gas Resources, Inc.        
|5)                 |  | Western Power Services, Inc.        
|6)                 |  | WGR Canada, Inc.                    
|7)                 |  | Lance Oil & Gas Company, Inc.       
|8)                 |  | Mountain Gas Transportation, Inc.   
|9)                 |  | Western Gas Wyoming, L.L.C.         
|10)                |  | Western Gas ResourcesWestana, Inc. 
|11)                |  | Western Gas ResourcesOklahoma, Inc.



QuickLinks
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED 
09/30/97.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        09/30/97
<PERIOD-END>                             09/30/97
<CASH>                                          0
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0
<SECURITIES-RELATED PARTIES>                    0 
<PP&E>                                     220000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             220000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      104439
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    11277
<OTHER-SE>                                 104284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               220000
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (17310)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (17310)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6246

JEROME JILAH BUTTS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ROY COOPER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:20-hc-02079-FL)

Submitted: June 29, 2021 Decided: July 2, 2021

Before HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Jilah Butts, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Jilah Butts seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 

759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Butts has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Rehearing granted and

appeal dismissed by

opinion filed 5/17/02
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7961

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL L. MOORE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CR-97-362-A, CA-00-1776-AM)

Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 11, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Michael L. Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001), and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We dismiss the appeal from the

denial of the § 2255 motion for lack of jurisdiction because the

appeal was untimely filed. The district court entered its order

denying § 2255 relief on June 25, 2001. Moore did not file his

notice of appeal within the sixty-day appeal period provided by

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), nor did the district court extend the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopen the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this portion of the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction.

In his motion, Moore sought reconsideration of the court’s

denial of his § 2255 motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this

portion of the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Unites States v. Moore, Nos. CR-97-362-A; CA-00-1776-AM (E.D. Va.

July 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended  quarterly  report of LaSalle Brands  Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Frank Holdraker,  certify to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Frank Holdraker
---------------------------
Frank Holdraker, Chairman
October 11, 2007
Exhibit A dated February 21, 2011, to the Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.7 

 

 

  

	To:	Todd Strubbe 


	From:	West Corporation Compensation Committee 


	Date:	February 21, 2011 

  

	Re:	Exhibit A 

  

This Exhibit A for 2011 is entered into pursuant to your Employment Agreement. 

 

	1.	Your base salary will be $500,000.00. 

  

	2.	Effective January 1, 2011, you will be eligible to receive a bonus based on achieving the Unified Communications segment Net Operating Income before Corporate
Allocations and Before Amortization at the rate outlined below. 

  

			
	 Net Operating Income Before Corporate

    Allocations and Before Amortization
	  	Rate
	             $0 - $411,622,000
	  	0.0972%
	            Over $411,622,000
	  	1.0%

 A maximum of 75% of
the pro-rata portion of the bonus may be advanced quarterly. If any portion of the bonus is advanced, it will be paid within thirty (30) days from the end of the quarter. 100% of the total bonus earned will be paid no later than
February 28, 2012. In the event there is a negative calculation at the end of any quarter and a pro-rata portion of the bonus has been advanced in a previous quarter, “loss carry forward” will result and applied to the next quarterly
or year-to-date be applied to the next quarterly or year-to-date calculation. In the event that at the end of the year, or upon your termination if earlier, the aggregate amount of the bonus which has been advanced exceeds the amount of bonus that
otherwise would have been payable for 2011 (in the absence of advances) based on the performance during 2011, (or, in the case of your termination, based on the performance during 2011 and the projection for performance for the balance of 2011 as of
your termination date), then the amount of such excess may, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, either (i) result in a “loss carry forward” which shall be applied to the next quarterly or year-to-date calculation of bonus
payable in subsequent periods, or (ii) be required to be paid back to the company upon such request. 
  

	3.	In addition, if West Corporation achieves its 2011 publicly stated EBITDA guidance, you will be eligible to receive an additional one-time bonus of $100,000. This bonus
is not to be combined or netted together with any other bonus set forth in this agreement. 

  

	4.	All objectives are based upon West Corporation and the Unified Communications segment operations, and will not include income derived from other mergers, acquisitions,
joint ventures, stock buy backs or other non-operating income unless specifically and individually approved by West Corporation’s Compensation Committee. 


 

	5.	At the discretion of the Compensation Committee, you may receive an additional bonus based on the Company’s and your individual performance.


  

			
	 /s/ Todd Strubbe
	 	
	Employee – Todd Strubbe
Exhibit 10.55






	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.55




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made effective as of the 16th day
of February, 2011, by and between CENTRA BANK, INC., a West Virginia corporation (“Employer”) and
DOUGLAS J. LEECH, JR. (“Employee”), joined by CENTRA FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC., a West Virginia
corporation (“Centra Financial”).



RECITALS:




The parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement by and between Employee and Employer and
joined by Centra Financial, dated as of January 17, 2008, as amended on March 17, 2008, January 13,
2009, and September 23, 2010 (the “Employment Agreement”) to give Employer the sole discretion at
any time hereafter to make accelerated distributions of deferred compensation thereunder as
permitted by Section 409A the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the applicable
Treasury Regulations thereunder.



NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding a
new Subsection 9(j) which shall read as follows:



(j) Employer may, in its sole discretion, make any accelerated distribution permissible under
Treas. Reg. section 1.409A-3(j)(4) to Employee of deferred amounts,
provided that such distribution(s) meets the requirements of Treas. Reg. section
1.409A-3(j)(4).



[signatures are on the next page]




 


 









 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first
written above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CENTRA BANK, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By	 	Its Compensation Committee	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CENTRA FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EMPLOYEE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Douglas J. Leech, Jr.
Exhibit 10.8
  FIRST
    LEASE AMENDMENT
    Recitals
    10-6-04.
      Amendment
    Terms
  Additional Premises.
  Expiration Date.
  Renewal Option.
  Rental Rate.
 1




---



##### 



Rent Escalation.
  Year

Annual Base Rent9-1-07 through 8-31-08

$
700,487.559-1-08 through 8-31-09

$
721,502.189-1-09 through 8-31-10

$
743,147.25   Security Deposit.
  Landlord Improvements.
  Utilities.
  Use of Racks.
  Condition of Additional
    Premises. roll-up
  Tenant Parking.
  Free Rent.
    Reaffirmation of Lease.
  Counterparts.
  [REMAINDER
    OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK]
 2




---



##### 



By:
    /s/  Jeff
    Yassai  Name:
    Jeff YassaiTitle:
    CEO  
    By:
    /s/  James
    J. Dal Porto  Name:
    James J. Dal PortoTitle:
    Exec VP COODate:
    9/12/06 3