alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CALIPERLIFE SCIENCES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

 

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter F. McAree,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify,pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge that:

 

(1)                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

(2)                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
|                   | /s/ PETER F. MCAREE                                |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                               |
|                   | Peter F. McAree                                    |
|                   | Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |
|                   | (Principal Financial  Officer)                     |
|                   |                                               |
|                   |                                               |
| Date: May 5, 2010 |                                               |

 

1

----
Motion Granted in Part and Denied in Part and Order filed April 26, 2021 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00197-CV

____________

TEXAS FUNDING CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS AND LINA HIDALGO IN HER OFFICIAL 

CAPACITY AS COUNTY JUDGE OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-11494

ORDER

This is an appeal from an order signed on April 9, 2021 (“the Order”). The 

Order grants the plea to the jurisdiction of defendants/appellees Harris County and 

Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo and dismisses plaintiff/appellant Texas Funding 

Corp.’s complaint with prejudice. 
2

On Friday, April 23, 2021, appellant filed an emergency motion for temporary 

relief under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 29.3, seeking to “protect[] the status 

quo.” The motion also asks that we expedite our consideration of the appeal. Tex. R. 

App. P. 38.6(d) (permitting court of appeals to shorten time for filing briefs and for 

submission of case in the interest of justice). 

Appellant stated in its notice of appeal that it is entitled to an interlocutory 

appeal of the Order under section 54.014(a)(8) of the Civil Practice and Remedies 

Code,

1

and that subsection 8 permits an appeal of an interlocutory order that grants 

or denies a plea to the jurisdiction by a governmental unit. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & 

Rem. Code § 51.014(a)(4), (8). 

The Order is not an interlocutory order. It disposes of all claims and parties, 

which makes it a final judgment. “A judgment that finally disposes of all remaining 

parties and claims, based on the record in the case, is final, regardless of its 

language.” Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001). Therefore, 

this appeal is not an interlocutory appeal; it is an appeal from a final judgment.

In an appeal from an interlocutory order, the court of appeals may make any 

temporary order necessary to preserve the parties’ rights until disposition of the 

appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 29.3. As explained, this is not an appeal from an interlocutory 

order. Rule 29.3 does not apply.

We deny the request for emergency relief. We grant the request for expedited 

briefing. Subject to motions to extend time, appellant’s brief is due on or before May 

1 The notice of appeal also cites section 51.014(a)(4), which permits an appeal of an interlocutory 

order that grants or refuses to grant a temporary injunction, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code 

§ 51.014(a)(4). Neither the Order nor any order in the appellate record grants or refuses to grant a 

temporary injunction. Instead, the record contains orders denying requests for temporary 

restraining orders. Orders granting or denying requests for temporary restraining orders are not 

appealable. See In re Abbott, 601 S.W.3d 802, 813 (Tex. 2020) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam).
3

13, 2021, and appellees’ brief is due within 20 days of the day appellant’s brief is 

filed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant.
|    |                                                                                                                                      |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NewPage Holdings Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                       |
|-----------------------|
|                       |  |  |  |
| Date:  March 20, 2014 |   | By:   /s/ George F. Martin         |   |
|                  |   | George F. Martin |   |
|                  |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                  |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2415 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2415

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 11 Dock Street in Pittston, Pennsylvania, as the ``Trooper Joshua D. 
                     Miller Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 6, 2011

Mr. Barletta (for himself, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. Altmire, Mr. 
 Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Shuster, 
 Mr. Marino, Mr. Critz, Ms. Schwartz, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Dent, Mr. Pitts, 
Mr. Holden, Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Kelly, and Mr. 
   Platts) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 11 Dock Street in Pittston, Pennsylvania, as the ``Trooper Joshua D. 
                     Miller Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TROOPER JOSHUA D. MILLER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11 Dock Street in Pittston, Pennsylvania, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Trooper Joshua D. Miller Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Trooper 
Joshua D. Miller Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2468 

To ensure that home health agencies can assign the most appropriate skilled 

professional to conduct the initial assessment visit and complete the 

comprehensive assessment for home health services for Medicare beneficiaries requiring rehabilitation therapy under a home health plan of 

care, based upon physician referral. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2011 

Mr. BOUSTANY (for himself and Mr. LEWIS of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To ensure that home health agencies can assign the most 

appropriate skilled professional to conduct the initial assessment visit and complete the comprehensive assessment for home health services for Medicare beneficiaries 

requiring rehabilitation therapy under a home health 

plan of care, based upon physician referral. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2468 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Home Health 

3 Flexibility Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PERMITTING HOME HEALTH AGENCIES TO ASSIGN 

5 THE MOST APPROPRIATE SKILLED PROFES6 SIONAL TO CONDUCT THE INITIAL ASSESS7 MENT VISIT AND COMPLETE THE COM8 PREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT UNDER A MEDI9 CARE HOME HEALTH PLAN OF CARE FOR RE10 HABILITATION CASES. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding paragraphs 

12 (a)(2) and (b)(3) of section 484.55 of title 42 of the Code 

13 of Federal Regulations or any other provision of law, a 

14 home health agency may determine the most appropriate 

15 skilled professional to conduct the initial assessment visit 

16 and to complete the comprehensive assessment for an indi17 vidual who is eligible for home health services under title 

18 XVIII of the Social Security Act but who does not require 

19 skilled nursing care as long as the skilled service (for 

20 which such therapist is qualified to provide the service) 

21 is initially ordered by the physician and, in the case of 

22 a referral order that includes occupational therapy, the 

23 order also includes physical therapy or speech language 

24 pathology. 

25 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in sub26 section (a) shall be construed to provide for initial eligiVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:02 Jul 09, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2468.IH H2468

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2468 IH

1 bility for coverage of home health services under title 

2 XVIII of the Social Security Act on the basis of a need 

3 for occupational therapy. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B E NJAMI N L OP E Z AY AL A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 71959 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 787- 470 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r27, 2011 ** B e f o r e : S I L V E R M A N , W . F L E T C H E R , an dM U R G U I A , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . B e nj am i n L ope z A y a l a , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea lfr om an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s r e mo v a lo r d e r . O u rj u r i s d i c t i o n i s g o v e rn e db y8 U . S. C. § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o c o n s titu tio n a l qu e s tio n s an dqu e s tio n s o f law , Kha n v. 

# FI LED OC T 6 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 71959 2 H older , 584 F . 3d 773, 776 ( 9th C i r . 2009) , and r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the d e n ia l o f ar e qu e s t f

o rac o n tin u an c e , A hm ed v. H older , 5 6 9 F .3 d1 0 0 9 , 1 0 1 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 9 ) . We d e n yi n p artan dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. L o p e z A y a la ’s c o n v ic tio n f o rin f lic tin g c o rp o r a l in

ju ryo n h is s p o u s e , in vi ol at i on of C al i forni a P enalC od e § 27 3. 5(a) , i s acr i m e of dom es t i c vi ol ence unde r8 U . S . C . § 1227( a ) ( 2) ( E ) ( i ) tha tr e nde r s hi m i ne l i gi bl e f orc anc e l l a t i on of r e m o v a l. See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 b ( b ) ( 1 ) ( C ) ; V asqu ez -H

erna ndezv. H

older , 590 F . 3d 1 0 5 3 , 1 0 5 6 - 5 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . T he a ge nc ydi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng L ope z A y a l a ’ s r e que s tf or as ix th c o n tin u an c e to a llo w h im to s e e kp o s t- c o n v ic tio n r e lie f . Se e Sandov al

-L una v. Mukasey , 526 F . 3d 1243, 1247 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( a ge nc ydi d notabus e di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng as e c ond c ont i nuanc e f ora l i e n t o pur s ue a l t e rna t i ve appl i c a t i on f or re l i ef ). W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o con si der L op ezA ya l a’ s c on t ent i on s thatar e u n r e la te dto h is f

in a l o r d e ro f

r e m o v a l. See 8 U . S . C . § 1252( a ) ( c onf e rr i ng j ur i s di c t i on ove rf

i na lor de r s of

r e m ova l ) . L ope z A y a l a ’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons ar e u np e r s u a s iv e . P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D in p a r t ; D I S M I S S E D in p a r t .
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2480 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the Administrative Conference of the United 

States for fiscal years 2012, 2013, and 2014, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2480 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Administrative Con3 ference of the United States Reauthorization Act of 

4 2011’’. 

5 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

6 Section 596 of title 5, United States Code, is amend7 ed to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘§ 596. Authorization of appropriations 

9 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

10 this subchapter not more than $2,900,000 for fiscal year 

11 2012, $2,900,000 for fiscal year 2013, and $2,900,000 

12 for fiscal year 2014. Of any amounts appropriated under 

13 this section, not more than $2,500 may be made available 

14 in each fiscal year for official representation and enter15 tainment expenses for foreign dignitaries.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives August 1, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
ms25014810-ex10_02b.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.02(b)




AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT



 


This AMENDMENT NO. 2 dated as of the 1st day of January, 2012, amends the MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT made as of the 13th day of October, 2006, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Management Agreement, dated as of the 29th day of April, 2011 (together, the “Management Agreement”) among CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC (formerly Demeter Management Corporation), a Delaware limited liability company (the “General Partner”), MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER WNT L.P. (formerly Morgan Stanley Charter WCM L.P.), a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”) and WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED, a United Kingdom company (the “Trading Advisor”).  Terms used and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Management Agreement.


 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS, the General Partner, the Partnership and the Trading Advisor wish to amend the Management Agreement to increase the amount of leverage used to manage the Partnership’s Net Assets.


 


NOW, therefore, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.  The following sentence shall be added to Section 2(a) of the Management Agreement:


 


“As set forth herein, the allocation of the Partnership’s Net Assets to the Trading Advisor will be made to the Trading Program, provided that the General Partner and the Partnership agree that the amount of leverage applied to the Net Assets of the Partnership allocated to the Trading Advisor by the General Partner shall be up to (but not in excess of) 1.5 times the Net Assets of the Partnership allocated to the Trading Advisor by the General Partner (the “Trading Level”), unless otherwise agreed by the parties hereto in writing.  The Trading Advisor shall trade the Partnership’s Net Assets on the basis of the Trading Level.”


 


2.  In all other respects the Management Agreement remains unchanged and of full force and effect.


 


3.  This Amendment No. 2 shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.


 


4.  This Amendment No. 2 may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute the same agreement.


 


THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


 







 




  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 has been executed for and on behalf of the undersigned as of the day and year first above written.


 




	 	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By 

	/s/ Walter Davis 	 
	 	 	Walter Davis	 
	 	 	President	 
	 	 	 	 







 




	 	MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY	 
	 	 	CHARTER WNT L.P.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By: 	Ceres Managed Futures LLC 	 
	 	 	(General Partner) 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By 

	/s/ Walter Davis 	 
	 	 	Walter Davis	 
	 	 	President	 
	 	 	 	 







 




	 	WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By 

	/s/ Rajeev Patel 	 
	 	 	Rajeev Patel	 
	 	 	Director, Winton Capital Management Limited	 
	 	 	 	 







 







 




-2-
Amendment to Employees' Excess Benefits Plan C



 Exhibit 10.P(3) 

AMENDMENT TO ALCOA INC. 
 EMPLOYEES’ EXCESS BENEFITS PLAN C 
 1.    Effective January 1, 2011,
the following will be added to the end of subsection 2.8 d. i): 
 To the extent a Participant dies before his or her payments
have begun, payments to the Surviving Spouse will be as follows: 
 1) If the Participant was a Participant in Rule IM of Plan
I, and dies while accruing pension service, the survivor annuity under this Plan will begin the later of: a) the month following the Participant’s death or b) the month after the Participant would have turned age 55. 

2) If the Participant was a Participant in Rule IC or Rule IN of Plan I, and dies while accruing pension service, the survivor annuity
under this Plan will begin the month following the Participant’s death. 
 3) If the Participant dies after pension service
has terminated, the survivor annuity under this Plan will begin the later of: the month following the Participant’s death or the month after the Participant would have turned age 55. 
 2.    The definition of Retirement is restated as follows: 

“Retirement” or “Retires” means the termination of employment after attainment of a specified age and specified
service as determined under Normal or Early Retirement type under Plan I Rules or Excess B. Notwithstanding the foregoing, “Retirement” also includes termination of active employment under a Disability Retirement under Plan I Rules, and
such disability must also comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations promulgated there under for purposes of this Plan. “Retirement” shall also mean any retirement as may be defined under any executive
severance agreement entered into between the Company and a Participant to the extent it otherwise complies with termination of employment for purposes of Section 409(A) of the Internal Revenue Code. 

3.    In all other respects the Plan is ratified and confirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19496]



[[Page 43281]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Twelfth RTCA SC-230 Airborne Weather Detection Systems Plenary

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Twelfth RTCA SC-230 Airborne Weather Detection Systems Plenary.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Twelfth RTCA SC-230 Airborne Weather Detection Systems 
Plenary. This is a subcommittee to RTCA.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 5-6, 2017 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held virtually at: https://rtca.webex.com/rtca/j.php?MTID=m98173957d2643d4c045b7fbb1e15119a, Join 
by phone: 1-877-668-4493, US/Canada Toll Free: 1-855-358-5393, Access 
code: 637 610 482, Meeting Password: 7Qw93McK.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karan Hofmann at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#167d7e79707b777878566462757738796471"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c4afacaba2a9a5aaaa84b6b0a7a5eaabb6a3">[email protected]</span></a> or 
202-330-0680, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, 
Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 
833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Twelfth RTCA SC-230 Airborne Weather 
Detection Systems Plenary. The agenda will include the following:

October 5, 2017 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m.

1. Welcome and Administrative Remarks
2. Introductions
3. Agenda Review
4. Meeting Minutes Review and Approval of Last Plenary
5. Review of Proposed Change 1 for SC-220A and SC-213A

October 6, 2017 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m.

1. Review of Proposed Change 1 for SC-220A and SC-213A
2. Action Item Review
3. Any Other Business
4. Date and Place of Next Meeting
5. Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 11, 2017.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17, 
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017-19496 Filed 9-13-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>