T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by N i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

T he H onor abl e F r e de r i c B l oc k, S e ni orU ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge f or ** * the E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof

N e w Y ork, s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. R UB E N C AS T R O, AK A N i t e Ow l , AK A T e c ol ot e , A K A T e c o, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 08- 50521 D . C . N o. 2: 06 -c r- 00 59 9-C A S -1 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C hr i s t i naA . S ny de r , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M a y 5, 2010 ** P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B e f o r e : O’ S C AN NL AI N an d T AL L MAN, C i r c u i tJ u d g e s , a n d B L OC K, *** D i stri ctJudg e. 

# FI LED MA Y11 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSF e d. R . C r i m . P . 11. 1 2 D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t R u b e n C a s tr o ap p e a ls th e d e n ia l o f h is M o tio n to W i thdr a w G ui l ty P l e a s . C a s tr o w a s i ndi c t e d i n the C e ntr a l D i s tr i c tof C a l i f orni aon on e c ou ntof R ac ket ee r I nfl uenced and C orruptO rgani za t i on s ( “ R IC O ”) C o n s p ir a c y , p u r s u a n t to 2 1 U .S .C . § 1 9 6 2 ( d ) , a n d tw o c o u n ts o f C o n s p ir a c y to D i s tr i but e C ontr ol l e d S ubs t a nc e s , pur s ua ntt o 21 U . S . C . § 846. C a s tr o, pr oc e e di ng p r o s e b u t w ith th e a s s is ta n c e o f s ta n db y c o u n s e l, p le d g u iltya s c h a r g e d w ith o u t a f o rm a l p le aa g r e e m e n t to a ll th r e e c o u n ts a f te raR u le 1 1 p le ac o llo q u y . S h o rtly 1 th e r e a f te r , C a s tr o m o v e d to w ith d r a w th o s e p le a s ; th a t m o tio n w a s d e n ie d . T h is appe a l t i m e l y f

ol l ow e d. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on pur s ua ntt o 28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e a f f i rm. T o e ns ur e tha tade f

e nda nt ’ s gui l ty pl e ai s know i ngl y , i nt e l l i ge nt l y , a nd vol unt a r i l y m a de , adi s tr i c tc ourtm us ta dvi s e the de f e nda ntof

— a nd c onf

i rm the de f e nda ntunde r s t a nds

— hi s r i ght s , the na tur e of the c ha r ge s a ga i ns thi m , a nd the co n seq u en ces o f p l ead i n g g u i l ty. F ed . R . C ri m . P . 1 1 (b )(1 ). T h e co u rtal so m u st a s s u r e its e lf

th a t th e r e is af

a c tu a l b a s is f

o rth e p le a . F e d . R . C r im . P . 1 1 ( b ) ( 3 ) . O nce the pl eaof gu i l ty has been acc ept ed by the di stri ctcourt , a def endantm ay w i thdr a w tha tpl e apr i ort o s e nt e nc i ng i f he “ c a n s how af

a i ra nd j us tr e a s on f

or re qu es t i ng the w i thd raw al . ” F ed. R . C ri m . P . 11 (d)( 2)(B ). A di stri ctcourt ’ s deni al3

o f am o tio n to w ith d r a w ag u ilty p le ais r e v ie w e d f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n . U

ni ted Stat es v. Sh ow al ter , 56 9 F . 3d 11 50 , 11 54 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d id n o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g C a s tr o ’s m o tio n to w i thd raw hi s pl ea s. T he re cord as a w ho l e dem on stra t es thatC as tro w as adequat el y a dv i se d o f the nature of the charges agai nsthi m and v ol un t ar i l y pl ed gui l ty t o the m . F urthe r , the gove rnm e nt ’ s pr of f e ra nd C a s tr o’ s a dm i s s i ons pr ovi de d as uf

f i c i e ntf a c tua l ba s i s f

orhi s pl e a s . C a s tr o ha s nots how n af a i ra nd ju s t r e a s o n w h y h e s h o u ld b e p e rm itte d to w ith d r a w h is p le a s . AF F I RME D.