alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1020

JUAN CARLOS LOPEZ, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A99-378-387) Submitted: August 31, 2007 Decided: September 13, 2007 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ivan Yacub, LAW OFFICE OF IVAN YACUB, Falls Church, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Greg D. Mack, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Juan Carlos Lopez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s order of removal. On appeal, Lopez raises only one issue: that 8 C.F.R. § 245a.2(e) (2007), which provides that an application for legalization under 8 U.S.C.A. § 1255a (West 2005 & Supp. 2007) must be filed with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (“CIS”), with review to an Administrative Appeals Unit, rather than with an immigration judge, deprives him of his constitutional rights of due process of law. “The Attorney General enjoys broad powers with respect to ‘the administration and enforcement of [the Immigr ation and Nationality Act] and all other laws relating to the immigration and naturalization of aliens.’” Blanco de Belbruno v. Ashcroft , 362 F.3d 272, 279 (4th Cir. 2004) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1103(a)(3) (2000)). Aliens have only those rights that Congress, and the Attorney General as guided by the applicable statutes, elect to provide them. Id. at 280. Here, the governing regulations place jurisdiction over legalization applications with the CIS, 8 C.F.R. § 245a.2(e), with a single level of appeal in the Administrative Appeals Unit. 8 C.F.R. § 245a.2(p). The Immigration Court and the Board have no jurisdiction to assess a legalization application or review its denial. Matter of Singh , 21 I. & N. Dec. 427, 433- 3 - (B.I.A. 1996). Lopez was provided with the proper procedures; therefore, he has received all the process he was due. SeeOrquera v. Ashcroft , 357 F.3d 413, 426 (4th Cir. 2003). (“To state a due process claim, the [alien] must first demonstrate that [he] ha[s] a protected interest and [he] ha[s] such an interest only as set out in [the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986] and [8 C.F.R.] § 245a.2[]”). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the fiscal
1997 Consolidated Financial Statements of Ameriking, Inc. and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      746 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,662
<PP&E>                                          56,304 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,807 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,903 
<BONDS>                                        128,794 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           32,264
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                             9 
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,178)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,807
<SALES>                                         54,395
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,395
<CGS>                                           17,810
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    48
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,762
<INCOME-TAX>                                       705
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,057
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc; (the Company) on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, JeanPierre Dallaire Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 9, 2009



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ JeanPierre Dallaire    
|JeanPierre Dallaire        
|Principal Accounting Officer
, C.J. 

jurisdiction. NRS 34.320. Either writ is an extraordinary remedy, and 

whether such a writ will be considered is within this court's sole 

discretion. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 

818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Moreover, it is petitioner's burden to 

demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. 

Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). 

Having considered petitioner's arguments in light of this 

court's resolution of the consolidated appeals in Docket Nos. 58530 and 

59162, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted. Smith, 

107 Nev. at 677, 679, 818 P.2d at 851, 853; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d 

at 844. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED.' 

, J. rut-, j 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge 

Marquis Aurbach Coffing 

Kemp, Jones & Coulthard, LLP 

John Peter Lee Ltd. 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'In light of our resolution of this writ petition, petitioner's 

emergency stay motion is denied as moot. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
December 5, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 127985 & (19) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 127985 COA: 256711 Ottawa CC: 03-027056-FH MATTHEW DAVI D BRADY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/
On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 16, 2004 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to remand to the trial court fo r an evidentiary hearing is DENIED.

C AVANAGH , J., would remand this case to the trial court for correction of the
sentence.

K ELLY , J., would remand this case fo r a hearing pursuant to People v Ginther , 390 Mich 436 (1973).

p1128 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 5, 2005
Clerk
Exhibit 15.1 JAMESSTAFFORDJames Stafford, Inc. Chartered Professional Accountants Suite 350 – 1111 Melville Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6E 3V6 Telephone +1 604 669 0711 Facsimile +1 604 669 0754 www.JamesStafford.ca
 8 September 2017 Securities and Exchange Commission100 F Street, NEWashington, DC 20549 Subject:

   Tower One Wireless Corp. (the “Company”)
 Dear Sirs: We have read Item 16F – Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant of the Form 20-F –Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company dated 8 September 2017 and provide the following comments: We agree with the statements concerning our Firm concerning our Firm in the Form 20-F dated 8 September 2017. We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein. Yours truly, /s/ James StaffordChartered Professional Accountants


---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Jost Fischer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|            |  |  |  |                          
|----------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|May 8, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ JOST FISCHER         
|            |  |  |  | Jost Fischer             
|            |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer  
|            |  |  |  | (Chief Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Sirona
Dental Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 YEAR-TO-DATE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS REPORTED ON FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY  BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001014920
<NAME>                        OPTIKA INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         5,008
<SECURITIES>                                  10,532
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                      86
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              19,326
<PP&E>                                         6,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,964
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                22,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,276
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         10,356
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           8
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  22,417
<SALES>                                        4,130
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              12,230
<CGS>                                            382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              18,262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (9,480)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (2,966)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (12,446)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (12,446)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (2.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.28)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19872]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator and Foreign 
Utility Company Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Docket No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NextEra Energy Bluff Point, LLC.........  EG17-115-000
Horse Hollow Wind IV, LLC...............  EG17-116-000
Horse Hollow Wind II, LLC...............  EG17-117-000
CA Flats Solar 130, LLC.................  EG17-118-000
Buckthorn Wind, LLC.....................  EG17-119-000
Bearkat Wind Energy I, LLC..............  EG17-120-000
Cottonwood Wind Project, LLC............  EG17-121-000
Jacinta Solar Farm S.R.L................  FC17-2-000
Nicefield S.A...........................  FC17-3-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of August 2017, the status of the 
above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign 
Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's 
regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) (2017).

    Dated: September 13, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19872 Filed 9-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0471

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CARESSA JILL HARDY, aka

GLENN LEE DIBLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 3, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 29 2021

03/29/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0471
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19470]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): September 
14, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 8, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail & 
First-Class Package Service Contract 56 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017-198, CP2017-
299.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-19470 Filed 9-13-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

NOV 5 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN AYALA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ZAVARAS, Executive Director; GAIL

NORTON, Attorney General of the

State of Colorado,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 98-1192

(D.C. No. 98-D-67)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.**

Petitioner-Appellant Steven Ayala, a pro se litigant, seeks to appeal the

district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his petition for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1). He has filed a motion for leave to

proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs or fees and an application for a
- 2 -

certificate of appealability. He has also requested court-apppointed counsel and

seeks to supplement his pleadings.

We agree with the district court that Mr. Ayala has not demonstrated that he

has exhausted state court remedies regarding his claims. See 28 U.S.C. §

2254(b)(1)(A); see also Demarest v. Price, 130 F.3d 922, 932 (10th Cir. 1997).

Nor has he demonstrated futility. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(B)(i) & (ii); see also

Wallace v. Cody, 951 F.2d 1170, 1171 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, all pending

requests for relief, including his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and his

request for court-appointed counsel are DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 287 

Condemning the senseless murder and wounding of 18 individuals (sons, 

daughters, fathers, mothers, uncles, aunts, cousins, students, and teachers) in Roseburg, Oregon, on October 1, 2015. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 8, 2015 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. MERKLEY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the senseless murder and wounding of 18 individuals (sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, uncles, aunts, 

cousins, students, and teachers) in Roseburg, Oregon, 

on October 1, 2015. 

Whereas, on October 1, 2015, an armed gunman opened fire 

on the Umpqua Community College campus in Roseburg, 

Oregon, killing 9 individuals and wounding 9 other individuals; 

Whereas deceased and surviving victims demonstrated acts of 

heroism and sacrifice for the safety and sake of others; 

Whereas the first responders were swift and professional in 

their response to the initial call, which avoided even more 

bloodshed; and 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 287 IS 

Whereas local, State, and Federal law enforcement, firefighter, and medical service professionals performed their 

duties with utmost skill and coordination: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) offers condolences to the families and 

3 friends of individuals who were murdered by an 

4 armed gunman on the Umpqua Community College 

5 campus in Roseburg, Oregon, on October 1, 2015; 

6 (2) expresses hope for the swift and complete 

7 recovery of individuals who were wounded by the 

8 gunman; 

9 (3) applauds the swift response and profes10 sional conduct of— 

11 (A) the first responders to the scene; and 

12 (B) the investigating officers following the 

13 neutralization of the gunman, including local, 

14 State, and Federal officials and others who of15 fered their support and assistance; and 

16 (4) remains committed to reducing the likeli17 hood of this kind of event happening again. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0195. HENDERSON v. THE STATE.

This case was docketed by this Court on August 13, 2018, and appellant’s brief

and enumerations of error were due September 5, 2018. As of the date of this order,

appellant has not filed a brief and enumeration of errors and has not requested an

extension of time in which to do so. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED

pursuant to Court of Appeals Rules 13 and 23. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 06, 2018

09/06/2018
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:









1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and









2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

















Date: November19, 2010
By:/s/ Joseph M. CumminsJoseph M. Cummins

President, Chief Executive Officer














Date: November19, 2010
By:/s/ Bernard CohenBernard Cohen

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer