alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2491 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow refunds of Federal 

motor fuel excise taxes on fuels used in mobile mammography vehicles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2011 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself and Mrs. MYRICK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow refunds of Federal motor fuel excise taxes on fuels used 

in mobile mammography vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mobile Mammography 

5 Promotion Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFUNDS OF FEDERAL MOTOR FUEL EXCISE TAXES 

7 FOR FUEL USED IN MOBILE MAMMOGRAPHY 

8 VEHICLES. 

9 (a) REFUNDS.—Section 6427 of the Internal Rev10 enue Code of 1986 (relating to fuels not used for taxable 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2491 IH

1 purposes) is amended by inserting after subsection (f) the 

2 following new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(g) FUELS USED IN MOBILE MAMMOGRAPHY VEHI4 CLES.—Except as provided in subsection (k), if any fuel 

5 on which tax was imposed by section 4041 or 4081 is used 

6 in any highway vehicle designed exclusively to provide mo7 bile mammography services to patients within such vehi8 cle, the Secretary shall pay (without interest) to the ulti9 mate purchaser of such fuel an amount equal to the aggre10 gate amount of the tax imposed on such fuel.’’. 

11 (b) EXEMPTION FROM RETAIL TAX.—Section 4041 

12 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the fol13 lowing new subsection: 

14 ‘‘(n) FUELS USED IN MOBILE MAMMOGRAPHY VEHI15 CLES.—No tax shall be imposed under this section on any 

16 liquid sold for use in, or used in, any highway vehicle de17 signed exclusively to provide mobile mammography serv18 ices to patients within such vehicle.’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

21 of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CALIPER LIFESCIENCES, INC.

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas T. Higgins,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify,pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ THOMAS T. HIGGINS                                  |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas T. Higgins                                      |
|   | Executive Vice  President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

Date:   May 10, 2006

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,122,139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,200,022
<PP&E>                                         122,703
<DEPRECIATION>                                 107,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,352,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,275
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,263
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,280,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,352,797
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               164,423
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (136,078)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (136,078)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (136,078)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14
OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Warren Clamen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
period ended December 31, 2012 of Iconix Brand Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2013                                              
|                                                                  
|/s/ Warren Clamen                                                 
|Warren Clamen
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         97,045
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,741,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                   68,133
<INVENTORY>                                    6,647,079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,167,790
<PP&E>                                         2,817,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,132,163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 21,445,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          21,671,563
<BONDS>                                        2,369,248
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    521
<COMMON>                                       376,126
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,972,008)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   21,445,450
<SALES>                                        24,979,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               24,980,294
<CGS>                                          21,283,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,226,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (174,188)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,256,505
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,612,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,612,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,612,009)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.67)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2392 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2392

   To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to enter into building 
                          leasing agreements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2011

 Mr. Peterson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to enter into building 
                          leasing agreements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE TO ENTER INTO LEASE 
              AGREEMENTS.

    Section 585 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Special Leasing Authority for Secretary of Agriculture.--The 
authority provided to the Administrator under subsection (a)(1) with 
respect to entering into lease agreements shall also apply to the 
Secretary of Agriculture for purposes of entering into lease agreements 
for the Department of Agriculture or any agency, administration, or 
service thereof.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) The
Consolidated Balance sheet as of June 30, 1999 and the Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the six months ended June 30, 1999. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) Financial Statements included in this Form
10-QSB for period ended June 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,869,062
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,901,636
<PP&E>                                         250,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                 136,083
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,056,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,736
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,603
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,912,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,056,975
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,638
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,131,399
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               845,419
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,929,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,929,350)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.50)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4743

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MONRAIL LASHUN MADDOX, a/k/a Monral Lashun

Maddox,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (CR-03-92)

Submitted: March 16, 2005 Decided: March 29, 2005

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Camille M. Davidson, THE FULLER LAW FIRM, Charlotte, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States

Attorney, Donald D. Gast, Assistant United States Attorney,

Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Monrail Lashun Maddox pled guilty to one count of being

a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(g) (2000). Maddox reserved the right to challenge the

district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. 

We review the district court’s factual findings

underlying a motion to suppress for clear error and review its

legal determinations de novo. Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S.

690, 699 (1996); United States v. Rusher, 966 F.2d 868, 873 (4th

Cir. 1992). When a suppression motion has been denied, we construe

the evidence in the light most favorable to the government. United

States v. Seidman, 156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir. 1998). Finding no

error, we affirm. 

We find there was no clear error in the district court’s

findings. We further find the legal determinations are correct.

Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and sentence. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               1,376
<SECURITIES>                                         3,359
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10,673
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,748
<INVENTORY>                                         15,408
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    31,726
<PP&E>                                               9,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      42,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               13,330
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               100
<OTHER-SE>                                          28,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        42,340
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    38,288
<CGS>                                               28,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       24,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (13,727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (495)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (13,232)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (13,232)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (1.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.32)



</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3842

_____________________________
A NTHONY D ALE C ARTER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Tatiana Salvador , Judge

. June 28, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. Sanchez v. State , 174 So. 3d 439, 442 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

R AY , B ILBREY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Anthony Dale Carter, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphr ey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-20326 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. EUGENE H WILLIAMS, JR Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-237-2
Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Eugene H. Williams, Jr., appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of unregistered destructive devices, possession of unlaw fully transferred destructive devices, possession ofa firearm not identified by a serial number, and unlawful storage of explosive materials. Williams argues that 26 U.S.C. § 5841, et seq., the National Firearms Act, and 18 U.S.C. § 842(j) are unconstitutionally void for vagueness. He contends that the aforementioned statutes fail to place him on notice ofcriminal conduct because lawenforcement United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 18, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-20326

2 officers are generally unaware ofthe federal regulations on possession, storage, and transfer of destructive devices. We review de novo whether a statute is void for vagueness. U nited States
v. Monroe

, 178 F.3d 304, 308 (5th Cir. 1999). The language of the statutes of
which Williams complains is not confusing. The statutes proscribe specific conduct and do not contain exceptions for lawenforcement officers. The statutes do not encourage arbitrary and discri minatory enforcement. See Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 357 (1983). Williams’s argument is without merit. Williams alsochallenges the district court’s application of U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 based on a finding that Williams obstructed justice. He argues that the statements and conduct upon which the § 3C1.1 enhancement was based were not related to the “instant” offense of conviction but rather to an investigation ofaggravated assault. Although Williams correctly asserts that § 3C1.1 requires that a defendant obstruct the offense of conviction, “[t]he offense of conviction may or may not be the offense whic h initially attracted the attention of the police.” U nited States v. Dortch, 923 F.2d 629, 632 (5th Cir. 1999). In our view, the statements and conduct upon which the enhancement was based were intended to obstruct investigation of all o f his unlawful conduct. See United States v. Roberson, 872 F.2d 597, 609-10 (5th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, the district court did not err in applying the § 3C1.1 enhancement. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1I, Richard K. Crump, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sterling Chemicals, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 13, 2007       /s/ RICHARD K. CRUMP Richard K. Crump