alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

1.     The
undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Western Gas Resources, Inc. ("Western Gas Resources"). This Certification is
made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Western Gas Resources for the year ended
December 31, 2004.

2.     We
certify that such Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western
Gas Resources.

This
Certification is executed as of March 11, 2005.

| |  | /s/PETER A. DEAPeter A. Dea
Chief Executive Officer and President                           
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/WILLIAM J. KRYSIAKWilliam J. Krysiak
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SETH LOUIS HAMILTON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 359 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
*The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral

estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments;

nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th

Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 7 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

CURTIS D. HORNE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

G. L. HERSHBERGER, ADX Warden;

DR. C.A. STRATMAN, Clinical

Director; B. JETT, Medical

Administrator,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 97-1173

(D.C. No. 97-D-72)

(District of Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, BALDOCK and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

Curtis D. Horne, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial

of his pro se civil rights complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). In his

complaint, Mr. Horne alleged that defendants violated the Eight Amendment to
- 2 -

the United States Constitution by being “deliberately indifferent” to the “serious

medical need” posed by his hemorrhoids. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97,

104-06.

The district court denied Mr. Horne the relief he sought. Judge Daniel

found that appellant was proceeding in forma pauperis, then dismissed Mr.

Horne’s complaint sua sponte under the amended federal in forma pauperis

statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), as legally frivolous and for failing to state a

claim upon which relief might be granted.

Reviewing the materials submitted by Mr. Horne, we are convinced that for

the reasons it stated, the district court was correct to find his claim frivolous and

legally insufficient. But the district court appears to have erred in finding that

appellant was proceeding in forma pauperis. The record before us indicates that

Mr. Horne paid the full filing fee on 31 January, 1997. Thus, the district court

erred in relying on 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to dismiss the appellant’s action. However,

this administrative error is of no consequence. We may affirm the district court

on any grounds supported by the record. See United States v. Sandoval, 29 F.3d

537, 542 n.6 (10th Cir. 1994). A district court may dismiss a claim sua sponte

when, as here, “it is patently obvious that the plaintiff could not prevail on the

facts alleged.” McKinney v. Oklahoma Dept. of Human Servs., 925 F.2d 363,

365 (10th Cir. 1991) (internal quotation and citation omitted). For the reasons
- 3 -

stated by the district court, the allegations contained in Mr. Horne’s complaint are

entirely insufficient to support his claim.

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
| (logo) WELLS

      FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel: 410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

Bank of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc.

Bank of America Tower

One Bryant Park

New York, New York 10036, 

Attention: David S. Fallick

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and for the Southdale Center Loan Combination (in such capacity, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the “reporting period”):

 

 

(a)  A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Servicing Agreement(s)”) has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

 

                                

Date: March 18, 2015March 27, 2015

 

/s/Brian Smith

Brian Smith

Vice President

 

 

 

 

 

 

To: Bank of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc.

 

 

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

 

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2013, by and among MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL I INC., as Depositor, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer and Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Trust Advisor and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian relating to the Series MSBAM 2013-C10 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, relating to the Southdale Center Loan Combination, a pari passu portion of which is included in the Series MSBAM 2013-C11 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To: Bank of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc.

 

 

Schedule B

 

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT HAM ID JAVADI; e t a l ., Pe titione rs, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-73931 Age n c y Nos. A098-522-637

A098-522-638 A098-522-639 A098-522-640 M EM O R ANDUM * On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d July 21, 2015 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, B EA, a nd M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s. Ham id Ja v a di a nd M ojga n Fooroughi, na

tive s of Iran and c i tiz e ns of Ira n and Ge rm any , a

n d Arm in Ja

va di a nd Za ra Eile e n Ja

va di, na tive s and c itiz e ns of Ge rm a ny , pe tition for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing the ir m otion to re ope n re m ova l proc e e dings a nd re issue its pre v ious



# FIL ED AUG 04 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).de c ision. W e dism iss the pe t ition for re v ie w. de ny ing the i r m otion to re ope n

W e la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w the B IA’ s de c ision to de c line to e xe rc ise its disc re tiona

ry a uthority pursua nt to 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(a) to re ope n a nd re issue its De c e m b e r 2011 de c ision. Se e Me jia-He rnande

z v . Holde r , 633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th C ir. 2011). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D.

1 2 - 7 3 9 3 1 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 27
          - [WT Docket No. 06-150; DA 17-810]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Communications Commission is correcting a document that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 7, 2017. The document listed incorrect dates by which interested parties may file comments and reply comments.                    

# DATES:

This correction is applicable September 15, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Anna Gentry,                         *Anna.Gentry@fcc.gov,*                         of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, (202) 418-7769.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 2017-18987 appearing on page 42263 of the                     **Federal Register**                     of September 7, 2017, the following corrections are made:                

## Dates [Corrected]

                    On page 42263, the                     **Dates**                     heading is corrected to read “Interested parties may file comments on or before September 27, 2017, and reply comments on or before October 10, 2017.”                

Federal Communications Commission.

Neşe Guendelsberger,

Senior Deputy Bureau Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.

[FR Doc. 2017-19481 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: C.E.R., JR., A 

MINOR

PETITION OF: C.R., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 95 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2548 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 6310 North University Street in Peoria, Illinois, as the ‘‘Charles ‘Chip’ Lawrence Chan Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2548 EH

1 SECTION 1. CHARLES ‘‘CHIP’’ LAWRENCE CHAN POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 6310 North University Street in 

5 Peoria, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Charles ‘Chip’ Lawrence Chan Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Charles ‘Chip’ Law11 rence Chan Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 28, 2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2548 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostLawrence Chan Post Office Building’’. Street in Peoria, Illinois, as the ‘‘Charles ‘Chip’ al Service located at 6310 North University
Exhibit 32(a)

CEO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that the accompanying Form 10-QSB of CN Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company


/s/Jan W. Clark

Jan W. Clark
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 10, 2004



                                       23



<PAGE>
1

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2531

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

* District of Arkansas.

Oscar Santoscoy-Martinez, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 15, 2004

Filed: January 21, 2004

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Oscar Santoscoy-Martinez pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United

States after deportation following a conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation

of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court1

 sentenced him to 46 months

imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, Mr. Santoscoy-Martinez’s

counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), arguing that (1) the district court erred in enhancing Mr. Santoscoy-
-2-

Martinez’s sentence based on a Texas burglary conviction, because he received

ineffective assistance of counsel in that case; and (2) the court should have granted

a downward departure based on Mr. Santoscoy-Martinez’s overrepresented criminal

history. 

After careful review, we reject these arguments. Mr. Santoscoy-Martinez

cannot, in these proceedings, collaterally attack his prior state sentence based on

ineffective assistance of counsel, see United States v. Jones, 28 F.3d 69, 70 (8th Cir.

1994) (per curiam); and the departure argument is unreviewable, because there is no

indication the district court believed it lacked authority to depart, see United States

v. Moore, 245 F.3d 1023, 1026 (8th Cir. 2001).

Finally, we have reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v.

Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we

affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
#### Michael Saverese, Plaintiff, v Nicotra Group, LLC, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. Schwartz Goldstone & Campisi, LLP, Nonparty Appellant. Baxter Smith Tassan & Shapiro, P.C., et al., Nonparty Respondents. (And Other Actions.)

Submitted December 17, 2007;

decided February 12, 2008

Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 21, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00668

- CV

WEST 17TH RESOURCES, LLC , Pamela Mika Wolf, and Thomas Mika,

Appellant s

v.

Lucian A. PAWELEK and Carleen J. Pawelek,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 04

- 00087

- CVK

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The

appellant ’ s brief is due on February 9, 2015.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of January, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Schick Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
Rosner, Director of Finance and Administration of the Company, and its principal
financial officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


                                        /S/ Ronald Rosner
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Ronald Rosner
                                        Director of Finance
                                        and Administration
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)
                                        Schick Technologies, Inc.
                                        August 13, 2004

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been provided to Schick Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Schick
      Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.


                                       18
#### TAG 380, LLC, Respondent, v ComMet 380, Inc., Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff. GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Intervenor.

Submitted February 19, 2008;

decided March 13, 2008

Motion to enlarge the record on appeal granted. Cross motion to. strike portions of appellant’s reply brief denied.
<PAGE>   1

                    U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                 FORM 10-QSB\A
                               AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
                                  FORM 10-QSB
(Mark One)

[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE      
                                  ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 1996

[ ]  TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
               For the transition period from _______ to _______

                         Commission File Number 1-11857

                           MULTICOM PUBLISHING, INC.
          (Name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

          WASHINGTON                                 91-1551337
(State or other jurisdiction of                   (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                  Identification No.)

    1100 OLIVE WAY, SUITE 1250
       SEATTLE, WASHINGTON                              98101
      (Address of principal                          (Zip Code)
        executive offices)

Issuer's telephone number: (206) 622-5530

         Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                           Yes  X         No 
                               ---           ---


         The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of November 12,
1996: 5,612,169.


                                       1
<PAGE>   2




                                   SIGNATURES

         In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the
registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.


                                                MULTICOM PUBLISHING, INC.
                                                      (Registrant)


February 11, 1997                               By     ELLEN R. M. BOYER
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                       Ellen R.M. Boyer
                                                 Vice President of Finance and
                                                    Administration and Chief
                                                       Financial Officer
                                                    (Principal Financial and
                                                  Principal Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7549

WILLIE BRANCH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JUSTIN F. ANDREWS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:14-hc-02007-BO)

Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: December 19, 2014

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Branch, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie Branch, a prisoner in custody under a sentence 

imposed by the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, seeks 

to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, which the district court also 

construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both 

that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85

(2000). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Branch has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny Branch’s motions for transcript at government expense and 

for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, 

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED