alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS  OF INCOME FOR THE NINE  MONTHS  MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001014462
<NAME>                        Think New Ideas
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,322
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,084
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,041
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,894
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,922
<BONDS>                                            267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,030
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,568
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,531)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       197
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,728)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Section 1350 Certification -- Principal Financial Officer**

 

**Citizens Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citizens Financial Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) I, Len E. Schweitzer, Vice President and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: May 12, 2006

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Citizens Financial Corporation and will be retained by CFC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Schick Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David Schick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

                                               /S/ David B. Schick
                                               -------------------------------
                                               David Schick
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Schick Technologies, Inc.
                                               October 31, 2002
f8k021111ex10xii_kurrant.htm


Exhibit 10.12


 


Sales Contract 



	 
	Purchaser (Party A): Shandong Zhidali Industrial Co., Ltd.	Contract Signed Location: Beijing
	Supplier (Party B): Beijing Xinlianyu Technology Co., Ltd.	Contract Signed Date: 08/14/2010
	(Collectively, the “parties”)	 





 


    Upon negotiation, the parties have agreed to the following terms:


 



	
Name

	
Model

	
Unit

	
Amount

	
Unit Price ¥

	
Total Price¥

	
Delivery Date


	
Chips for Remote

	
V9-RMC8702B

	
Pieces

	
500

	
1.99

	
995

	  
	
The following is left blank

	  	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  	  	  
	
Total Purchase Price

	
  ¥995.00















	
1.   

	
Quality Inspection and Acceptance: Follow the technology Specifications












	
2.  

	
Requirements for Supplier and Raw Materials:








	
3.  

	
Requirements for Packing and Costs:








	
4.  

	
Delivery Manner, Location and Costs:








	
5.  

	
Payment Settlement and Time: Payable upon Delivery








	
6.  

	
Liabilities: Follow the Economic Contract Law








	
7.  

	
Miscellaneous:








	
8.  

	
This Contract shall executed in two copies with one copy to each party (faxed copy shall deem original) and shall be effective upon the parties’ signatures.












Valid Through: 12/31/2011








	
Purchaser [Seal]

	 	
Supplier [Seal]


	
Name: Shandong Zhidali Co., Ltd.

	 	
Name: Beijing Xinlianyu Technology Co., Ltd.


	
Address: Zhidali Technology Zone, 1 Zhidali Road, Economy Development Zone, Tengzhou City, Shandong Province

	 	
Address: 2 Shang’ao Shijizhongxin, Bldg A, Ste. 1601, Xisanqi, Changping District, Beijing


	
Corporate Representative:

	 	
Corporate Representative:


	
Agent:

	 	
Agent:


	
Tel.:

	 	
Tel.: (86)1-(illegible)


	
Fax: 0632-3957333

	 	
Fax: (illegible)


	
Bank:

	 	
Bank: China Agricultural Bank Changping District Branch Xisanqi Office


	
Bank Account:

	 	
Bank Account: 11-082201040031622


	
Zip Code:

	 	
Zip Code: 10096


	
[Corporate Seal ]

	 	
[Corporate Seal-Seal for Contract Only]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         78,087
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,299,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    441,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,586,917
<PP&E>                                         1,972,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                 45,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,091,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,028,656
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       60,163
<OTHER-SE>                                     (553,385)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,091,686
<SALES>                                        1,908,917
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,297,966
<CGS>                                          1,093,246
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,903,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             210,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                184,384
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            184,384
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   184,384
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .03
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41265 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. FELIX FERNANDO VARGAS-HERRERADefendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-532-1
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Felix F ernando Vargas-Herrera (Vargas) appeals from his guilty plea conviction of one count of illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He requests only that this court exercise its power pursuant to F ED
. R. C RIM
. P. 36 to correct an alleged clerical error in thejudgment. Specifically, he alleges that thejudgment ofthe district court misidentifies the nature ofhis offense as “[r]eentry ofa deported alien” when it should state that he was illegally found in the United States. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 10, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-41265

2 Rule 36 authorizes this court to correct only clerical errors, which exist when “‘the court intended one thing but by merely clerical mistake or oversight did another.”’ U nited Statesv. Steen, 55 F.3d 1022, 1025-26 n.3 (5th Cir. 1995) (quoting Dura-Wood Treating Co. v. Century Forest Indus., Inc., 694 F.2d 112, 114 (5th Cir. 1982)). In the district court’s judgment, the “Nature of Offense” description, “[r]e-entry of a deported alien,” so closely tracks the § 1326 title, “[r]eentry ofremoved aliens,” that it bears no indicia ofthe district court having made a mistake or oversight. Rather, it appears that the district court intended the “Nature of Offense” to refer generally to the title of § 1326. Such a method ofreference to § 1326 is not uncommon. In fact, this court has often used the term “illegal reentry” in reference to violations of § 1326 generally. See, e.g., United Statesv. Gunera, 479 F.3d 373, 376 (5th Cir. 2007). It appears that the district court’s judgment uses the term “[r]e-entry of a deported alien” intentionally in reference to § 1326generally; therefore, there is no clerical error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

                        In a memorandum dated September 5, 2017, the Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) rescinded the June 15, 2012 DHS memorandum entitled “Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children.” The September 5, 2017 memorandum is available on the DHS Web site at the following location:                         *https://www.dhs.gov/​news/​2017/​09/​05/​memorandum-rescission-daca.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On June 15, 2012, then Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano issued a memorandum entitled “Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children.” The 2012 memorandum established the policy known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).

                    On September 5, 2017, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Elaine Duke issued a memorandum entitled “Rescission of the June 15, 2012 Memorandum Entitled `Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children.' ” The September 5, 2017 memorandum rescinded the June 15, 2012 memorandum and directed DHS personnel to take all appropriate actions to execute a wind-down of the DACA program consistent with the parameters established in the memorandum. The September 5, 2017 memorandum is available on the DHS Web site at the following location:                     *https://www.dhs.gov/​news/​2017/​09/​05/​memorandum-rescission-daca.*

Dated: September 11, 2017.

Elaine C. Duke,

Acting Secretary of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 2017-19794 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-97-P
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2015 (the “Report”) of Fifth Street Senior Floating Rate Corp . (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ivelin M. Dimitrov , the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/    Ivelin M. DimitrovName:    Ivelin M. DimitrovDate: December 14, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-Q for the six months ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,954
<SECURITIES>                                     3,983
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                       101
<INVENTORY>                                         59
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,605
<PP&E>                                          14,492
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,658
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,889
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,895
<SALES>                                         13,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,378
<CGS>                                            3,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (415)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    498
<INCOME-TAX>                                       162
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                336
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       336
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2515 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the dollar limitation 

on employer-provided group term life insurance that can be excluded 

from the gross income of the employee. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2011 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the dollar limitation on employer-provided group term 

life insurance that can be excluded from the gross income 

of the employee. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON EXCLUSION FOR 

4 EMPLOYER-PROVIDED GROUP TERM LIFE IN5 SURANCE PURCHASED FOR EMPLOYEES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 79(a) of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘$50,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$350,000’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2515 IH

1 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Section 79 of such 

2 Code is amended by adding at the end the following new 

3 subsection: 

4 ‘‘(f) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.— 

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxable 

6 year beginning after 2012, the $350,000 amount 

7 under subsection (a)(1) shall be increased by an 

8 amount equal to— 

9 ‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

10 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter11 mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar 

12 year in which the taxable year begins, deter13 mined by substituting ‘2011’ for ‘1992’ in sub14 paragraph (B) thereof. 

15 ‘‘(2) ROUNDING.—If any amount as adjusted 

16 under paragraph (1) is not a multiple of $10,000, 

17 such amount shall be rounded to the nearest mul18 tiple of $10,000.’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

21 December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Jay Sandon COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DALLAS POLICE ASSOCIATION & Glenn White, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-10709

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 11, 2008.

Jay Sandon Cooper, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Robert Lyon & Associates, Rowlett, TX, Mark Allen Ticer, Law Office of Mark A. Tieer, Bob Michael Gorsky, Dallas, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Cooper, a white Dallas police lieutenant, appeals the dismissal of his Title VII racial discrimination and retaliation claims against the Dallas Police Association (DPA) and its president, Glenn White. We affirm.

Cooper sued the DPA, the labor organization that represents the Dallas police officers, and White for racial discrimination and retaliation.

We agree with the district court that Cooper did not exhaust his administrative remedies as to his discrimination claim. His EEOC charge alleged only that DPA retaliated against him for opposing unlawful acts; it made no reference to discrimination. We also agree with the district court that Cooper’s claim against White, who was sued only in his official capacity, is redundant. *Indest v. Freeman Decorating, Inc.,*164 F.3d 258, 262 (5th Cir.1999).

The focus of Cooper’s retaliation claim is his non-selection as the Deputy Police Chief. He asserts that Chief Kunkle declined to promote him because the DPA damaged his reputation in retaliation for his actions in assisting two officers in prosecuting their discrimination complaints. We agree with the district court that the summary judgment evidence falls short of demonstrating a nexus between the protected action and Cooper’s failure to obtain the promotion. Chief Kunkle testified that his promotion decision was not affected by representation of the DPA. He asserted that he only consulted members of his command staff about the promotion. Cooper produced no evidence to refute this testimony or to show that representatives of the DPA influenced Chief Kunkle’s decision.

For these reasons and those stated by the district court in its June 7, 2007 order, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
ex1025.htm


Exhibit 10.25


 




CONTRACT


BETWEEN JEFF MANORE, PRO-GOLF TAECHING ACADEMY LLC AND





ELEMENT 21 GOLF (AREM)





 


 


October 20, 2010





 


VP OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT





 


PAYMENT TERM:


 






	
   1)

	
3 SETS OF SHAFTS/ MONTH FOR 12 MONTHS (Maximum 8 shafts per set)











	
2)  

	
$2,000/ MONTH PAID IN COMMON SHARES OF AREM BASED ON THE AVERAGE CLOSING PRICE OF THE LAST FIVE DAYS OF EACH MONTH

















	
3)  

	
PAY EXPENSES ON TRIP AND TOUR RELATED (Subject to all expenses pre-approved in writing)

















	
4)  

	
MAINTAIN AT LEAST 100 SHAFT INVENTORY AT JEFF'S FACILITY (7550 STERNS RD, OTTAWA LAKE, MI 49267) (TO BE INVOICED BY AREM TO JEFF) WITH THE STARTING INVENTORY OF 448 SHAFTS

















	
   5)

	
INCENTIVE PROGRAM TO BE DEVELOPED AS THE PRODUCT IS LAUNCHED
















 


DUTIES:


 






	
   1)

	
FITTING OF PGA AND LPGA TOUR PLAYERS











	
2)  

	
CREATION OF FITTING SCHEDULES AND CHARTS FOR OEMS, TOUR TRAILERS, CLUB MAKERS AND INDIVIDUAL SALES











	
3)  

	
MANUFACTURING OF SHAFT SETS (IRONS, HYBRIDS, WEDGES AND PUTTERS)

















	
   4)

	
COORDINATING AND RUNNING SEMINARS FOR CLUB MAKERS








	
   5)

	
R&D FOR SCANDIUM AND COMPOSITE SHAFTS











	
6)  

	
SHAFTS RETAINED/ BOUGHT BY JEFF WILL BE CHARGED AT $24/SHAFT EXCEPT FOR THE 3 SETS PER MONTH FOR THE 12 MONTH PERIOD






















 


TERM:


 






	
   1)

	
COMMENCING OCTOBER 20,2010 AND ENDING ON OCTOBER 19,2011








	
   2)

	
RENEWABLE UPON MUTUAL AGREEMENT











	
   3)

	
3 MONTHS TERMINATION BY EITHER PARTY







 






		
	
JEFF MANORE


PRO-GOLF TEACHING ACADEMY LLC  

	
NATALIYA HEARN


ELEMENT 21 GOLF COMPANY



(AREM)