alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2














CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
§ 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Point.360 ( the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Alan R. Steel, Chief Financial Officer of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
      knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.














/s/
      Alan R.
      Steel


Alan
      R.
      Steel


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      14, 2006
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-11322

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDUARDO SILVA-ANDRADE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:98-CR-97-2-A

--------------------

October 20, 1999

Before JONES, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eduardo

Silva-Andrade has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Silva-Andrade has filed a motion to proceed pro se on appeal. 

Silva-Andrade’s motion, having been filed after counsel’s Anders

brief, is untimely and is therefore DENIED. See United States v.

Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). Our independent

review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no 
No. 98-11322

-2-

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Community Central Bank
Corporation.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report.4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurances regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on our evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
  By:
    S/ RAY T. COLONIUSRay T. ColoniusInterim President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Joanne WHEATON, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-73212.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.*

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Joanne Wheaton, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Kurt B. Larson, Esq., Stacy S. Paddack, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*62Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral

MEMORANDUM **

Joanne Wheaton, a native and citizen of Canada, petitions pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to remand and affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her motion to reconsider its previous removal order. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, *Oh v. Gonzales,*406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.2005), and the denial of a motion to remand, *Castillo-Perez v. INS,*212 F.3d 518, 523 (9th Cir.2000). We dismiss the petition for review in part and deny in part.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s underlying removal order because the petitioner did not appeal from that order. *See Singh v. INS,*315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003). Instead, she filed only a motion to reconsider.

The BIA acted within its discretion in upholding the IJ’s denial of reconsideration because the IJ had correctly concluded that he lacked jurisdiction over the motion. *See Socop-Gonzalez v. INS,*272 F.3d 1176, 1180 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc) (“The purpose of a motion to reconsider is ... to demonstrate that the IJ or the BIA erred as a matter of law or fact”); *see also Matter of Patel,*16 I. & N. Dec. 600, 601 (BIA 1978) (where the BIA specifically limits the scope of a remand, the BIA retains jurisdiction over all other issues not remanded).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to remand because it considered the new evidence regarding hardship to Wheaton’s daughter and acted within its broad discretion in determining that it was insufficient to warrant reopening. *See Singh v. INS,*295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”); *see also Ramirez-Alejandre v. Ashcroft,*319 F.3d 365, 382 (9th Cir.2003) (“Under BIA procedure, a motion to remand must meet all the requirements of a motion to reopen and the two are treated the same.”).

Petitioner’s motion to file a late reply brief is granted. The Clerk shall file the brief received on June 20, 2007.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Jerry Lee Sanders

No. 06

- 22

- 00014

- CV Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Stevens

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice

Carter* participating

. *Justic e Carter, Retired, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED MARCH 22, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT
JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHI EF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIR D DISTRIC T, AT AU STIN NO. 03-01-00463-CV Country Coach, Inc ., Appell ant v. Texas D epartment of T ranspor tation Mot or Vehicl e Board, Appellee

DIRECT APPEAL FROM TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT ION MOTOR VEHICL E BOARD
On Novem

ber 13, 200 1, a

ppe l l an t Cou ntr y Coa ch , In

c. f i l ed a m oti on i n th i s Court to dism iss i ts appeal. The motion is granted. T he appeal is dis mi sse d. See Tex. R. A pp. P. 42.1(a )(2).

Jan P. Patterson, Justice Be f ore J us ti ce s K i dd, Ye ak el

an d Pa tters on Di sm i ss ed on A ppe l l an t’s Moti on File d: Novem

ber 29, 2001 Do No t Publis

h2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CALIPER LIFESCIENCES, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CaliperLife Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, E. Kevin Hrusovsky, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to the requirement set forthin Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ E. Kevin Hrusovsky                |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | E. Kevin Hrusovsky                    |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Date: August 9,2007

----
Exhibit 35.3



LOGO

SEMT 2013-8; SEMT 2013-9; SEMT 2013-10; SEMT 2013-11; SEMT 2013-12;

SEMT 2014-1; SEMT 2014-2; SEMT 2014-3; SEMT 2014-4

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB

The undersigned, a duly
authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreements governing the securities listed on Exhibit A, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period 1/1/14 to 12/31/14, (the Reporting Period) and of the Servicers performance
under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 28th day of February 2015.



|    |  |                   |  |                      
|--- |  | ----------------- |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Michael Blair
|    |  | Name:             |  | Michael Blair        
|    |  | Title:            |  | Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT 35.1

VW Credit, Inc. Annual Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Section 7.11 of the Transaction SUBI Servicing Supplement

And Item 1123 of Regulation AB





VOLKSWAGEN AUTO
LEASE TRUST 2013-A





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of VW Credit, Inc. (VCI), as Servicer under the Transaction SUBI Supplement 2013-A to Servicing
Agreement dated as of July 25, 2013 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Transaction SUBI Servicing Supplement), by and among VW Credit Leasing, Ltd., VCI, as Servicer, and U.S.
Bank National Association, as SUBI Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from July 25, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance under the Transaction SUBI Servicing Supplement was conducted under my
supervision.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Transaction SUBI Servicing Supplement in all material respects throughout such period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this twenty-eighth day of March, 2014.



/s/ Dr. Christian DahlheimName:

Dr. Christian DahlheimTitle:

Executive Vice President & CFO
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2430 

To amend the percentage of funds appropriated under title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 required to be reserved 

for outlying areas and the Secretary of the Interior. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 6, 2011 

Mr. SABLAN (for himself, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Ms. BORDALLO, and Mr. 

FALEOMAVAEGA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the percentage of funds appropriated under title 

I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

1965 required to be reserved for outlying areas and 

the Secretary of the Interior. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GRANTS FOR OUTLYING AREAS AND THE SEC4 RETARY OF THE INTERIOR. 

5 Section 1121(a) of the Elementary and Secondary 

6 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6331(a)) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2430 IH

1 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 

2 striking ‘‘a total of 1 percent to provide assistance 

3 to’’; 

4 (2) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘.5 percent 

5 to provide assistance to’’ before ‘‘the outlying’’; and 

6 (3) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘.75 percent 

7 to provide assistance to’’ before ‘‘the Secretary’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

 

MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

60 WALL ST

NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2013-CCRE10 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
EXHIBIT
32











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350











We,
each hereby certify to the best of our knowledge that the Fourth Amended
Annual Report of Form 10-K/A-4 of Gateway Tax Credit Fund II Ltd. for the year
ended March 31, 2007 containing the financial statements fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the periodic report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.














/s/ Ronald M.
Diner


President


Raymond
James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.


(the
Managing General Partner)


January 20,
2009











/s/ Jonathan
Oorlog


Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer


Raymond
James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.


(the
Managing General Partner)


January 20,
2009
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19851]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express and Priority Mail 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): September 
19, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 13, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Express & Priority Mail Contract 51 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017-202, CP2017-
305.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-19851 Filed 9-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A0 37 6 . CECELI A P. SAUNDERS et a l. v

. W RI PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC et a l

.

Cecel i a P. Sau n d ers fi l ed i n t h e t ri al co u rt an “ Affi d av i t o f Il l eg al i t y ,” i n wh i ch

s h e cl ai m ed t h at a prev i ou s o rd er o f t h e t ri al co u rt g ran ti n g a w ri t o f po s ses s i o n i n

fav o r o f W RI Pro pert y M an ag em en t

, L LC, w as v o i d an d u n en fo rceab l e. Sh e fi l ed a

n o t i ce o f a p p eal of t h e p u rp o rt ed d en i al o f t h e affi d av i t d i rect ed t o t h e Su p rem e

Co u rt

, wh i ch t ran s ferred t h e ap p eal t o t h i s Co u rt

. T h e t ri al co u r t r e c o rd d o es n ot

co n tai n an y

fi l in g s s u b s eq u en t t o t h e fi l i n g o f t h e affi d av i t.

Sau n d ers ’ s ap p eal is prem at u re b ecau s e, g i v en t h e ap p aren t ab s en ce o f a t ri al

co u rt o rd er, we h av e n o t h i ng t o rev i ew. See Ami ca v. S t a te

, 3 0 7 G a. Ap p. 2 7 6

, 2 8 2

(2 ) (7 04 SE2 d 8 31 ) (2 0 1 0 ); s ee al s o W a r d v. S t a t e , 2 9 9 Ga. Ap p

. 8 2 6

, 8 2 7 (6 8 3 SE2 d

8 9 4 ) (2 0 0 9 ) (t h i s Co u rt is fo r t h e co rrect i o n o f erro rs an d wi ll n ot co n s i d er i s s u es o n

wh i ch t he t ri al co u rt h as n ot ru l ed ). Acco rd i n gl y , Sau n d ers ’s ap p eal i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/18/2016 October 18, 2016
## United States Court of App eals F O R T H E E I G H T H

C I R C U I T

__ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 1- 33 60

__ __ __ __ __ _ Edv in Gon zal ez-He rn an de z, *
* Pet it io ne r, *
*
v. * Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w fro m th e * Bo ard of I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s. Eric H. Hold er, J r., Att or ne y Gene ral * of th e Uni te d S ta te s, * [UNPUBLISHED]
* Res po nd en t. *

__ __ __ __ __ _ Su bm it te d: May 1, 20 12 Fi le d: May 4, 20 12

__ __ __ __ __ _ Befo re WOL LMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ _ PER CURI AM.

Gua te m al an ci ti zen Edv in Gon zal ez-He rn an de z pe tit ion s fo r re view of an or de r of th e Bo ard of Im

m ig rat io n App eal s, whi ch affi rm ed an im m ig rat io n jud ge ’s de ni al of a s yl um an d wit hh ol di ng of rem ov al

. Afte r care fu l rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at

su bs ta nt ia l ev id en ce su pp or ts th e de ni al s of as y lu m an d wit hh ol di ng of rem ov al

. See Dav il a-M ejia v. Mu ka se y , 53 1 F.3 d 62 4, 62 7- 29 (8 th Ci r. 20 08 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w; di sc us si ng cl ai m an t’s bu rd en of pr oo f in as y lu m co nt ex t; whe n al ie n fai ls to es ta bl is h el ig ib il it y fo r as y lu m , he ne ces sa ril y can no t m eet m or e rig or ou s st an da rd of pr oo f fo r wit hh ol di ng of r em ov al ). Acco rd in gl y , we den y th e p et it io n. Se e 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |                                                |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  November 9, 2010 | /s/ Henry E. Gemino                                 |
|                              | Henry E. Gemino                                     |
|                              | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                              |                                                |
nd;
v. TMjrun ju&uial 0j<,7/lut 

## L-XMB VF IttM, IS7TXNC XN AUmMllSSQEIVEDIN

H. Af Yofcft £„// jf 4^4, .8 

### •Vktitim APR172015 to THfc' cLtnk'<> tmu: AbsSAcosia.Cferk i. tame- neu) Teilt-lett&t. Oktrsll J. UuiMl 9e4UU*i tilt, Aou// Pe, it 

## u /; rlu ^[h "JH?,**'" "i***** »k<* ^w„„/

Ve,y Truly You/4. DkAAlU A JiilvfU^ Otitrell Tj Vkiteet hote 0. fi. *//,'* (iu/f /*47 FM 4£0 4/»