alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-13263

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cv-00166-JSM-MAP

ANTONIO SUAREZ, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, 

FERNANDO ALEGRIA, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, 

HILLARY MITCHELL, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, 

JUDHIT SANTANDER, 

 Plaintiffs – Appellants,

versus

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 Defendant – Appellee.

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(May 18, 2017)

Before JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER,* 

District Judge.

PER CURIAM: 

 

*

The Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Judge for the Middle 

District of Florida, sitting by designation.

Case: 16-13263 Date Filed: 05/18/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

The appellants, who previously worked as drivers for Uber Technologies, 

Inc., sued Uber asserting claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 

§ 201 et seq., the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 7434, and the Florida 

Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Fla. Stat. § 501.201 et seq. When Uber 

moved to compel arbitration in the district court, the drivers opposed the motion on 

the ground that the entire written agreement they had entered into was 

unconscionable under both California and Florida law.

Now, on appeal, the drivers assert three new arguments. They argue that 

they are exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act under 9 U.S.C. § 1, that the 

delegation clause is inapplicable because of the FAA exemption, and that the class 

waiver in Uber’s software agreement violates the National Labor Relations Act 

under 29 U.S.C. § 157. In exercise of our discretion, we choose not to address

these arguments, which are raised for the first time on appeal. See Access Now, 

Inc. v. Sw. Airlines Co., 385 F.3d 1324, 1326 (11th Cir. 2004) (describing “a case 

that is wholly different” from the case litigated below). We therefore affirm the 

district court’s decision to compel arbitration.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 16-13263 Date Filed: 05/18/2017 Page: 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Suffolk Regional Off-Track Betting Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, v New York State Racing and Wagering Board et al., Appellants-Respondents. (And Four Other Related Proceedings.)

Submitted February *19,*2008;

decided March 25, 2008

Motion by the Standardbred Owners Association for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motions for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ending October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada, Corporate Controller
      and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C,
      ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,





1)  the
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  the
      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By
      /s/
      Antonio Estrada


Antonio
      Estrada


Corporate
      Controller and


Principal
      Financial Officer


December
      14, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          60,105
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     48,268
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               870,575
<PP&E>                                       3,213,838
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,391,502
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,060,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,030,136
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       160,163
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,869,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,060,172
<SALES>                                        983,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               983,468
<CGS>                                          886,215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,362,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,219,422
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             355,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,355,190
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,355,190
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,355,190
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.49)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 15, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40748

Summary Calendar

In the Matter of: JUAN PEQUEÑO,

Debtor.

---------------------------------------------------------

JUAN PEQUEÑO,

Appellant,

versus

AURORA LOAN SERVICES INC; JOE DE LA FUENTE; MELISSA AVALOS;

ENRIQUE PEREZ 

Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-05-CV-135

--------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

For the reasons stated by the district court and bankruptcy

court below, we AFFIRM. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2585 

To require that fees for services provided by the Internal Revenue Service 

be deposited in the Treasury as general receipts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2011 

Mr. OLSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To require that fees for services provided by the Internal 

Revenue Service be deposited in the Treasury as general 

receipts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Instituting Responsible 

5 Spending Act’’ or as the ‘‘IRS Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEPOSIT OF IRS USER FEES AS GENERAL RE7 CEIPTS. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of law (includ9 ing section 3 under the heading ‘‘Administrative Provi10 sions—Internal Revenue Service’’ of title I of Public Law 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2585 IH

1 103–329), any fees for services provided by the Internal 

2 Revenue Service shall be deposited in the Treasury as gen3 eral receipts. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                   GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Fiscal Year Ended
                                                          -------------------------------------
                                                          February 28,             February 22,
                                                             2004                     2003
                                                          ------------            -------------
                                                                 (Dollars in thousands)
<S>                                                       <C>                     <C>
Earnings:
 Income before income taxes                               $    290,794            $     229,066
 Add:
  Interest on indebtedness                                      10,919                   11,267
  Equity income, net of distributions                            1,672                      316
  Minority losses                                                4,502                      578
  Portion of rents representative of the interest factor         1,315                    6,444
  Amortization of capitalized interest                             610                    1,176
                                                          ------------            -------------
    Adjusted earnings                                     $    309,812            $     248,847
                                                          ============            =============

Fixed charges:
  Interest on indebtedness                                      10,919                   11,267
  Portion of rents representative of the interest factor         1,315                    6,444
  Capitalized interest                                           1,658                      174
                                                          ------------            -------------
    Total fixed charges                                   $     13,892            $      17,885
                                                          ============            =============

       Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        22.30                    13.91
                                                          ============            =============
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19875]



[[Page 43759]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10179--First National Bank of Georgia Carrollton, 
Georgia

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for First National Bank of Georgia, 
Carrollton, Georgia (``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its 
receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of 
First National Bank of Georgia on January 29, 2010. The liquidation of 
the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by 
available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making 
a final dividend payment to proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated: September 14, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19875 Filed 9-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Exhibit 31.1I, Richard K. Crump, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sterling Chemicals, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 10, 2006     /s/ RICHARD K. CRUMP    Richard K. Crump   President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-56106) pertaining to the GTECH Holdings Corporation 2000 Omnibus
Stock Option and Long-Term Incentive Plan and the GTECH Holdings Corporation
1999 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-42932) pertaining to the GTECH Holdings Corporation 2000
Restricted Stock Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-64167)
pertaining to the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-57781) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan and
the 1998 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Election Plan, in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 No. 33-88426 and No. 333-27835) pertaining to the 1994
Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-27831)
pertaining to the 1996 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and the 1992
Outside Directors' Director Stock Unit Plan, of GTECH Holdings Corporation of
our report dated March 27, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of GTECH Holdings Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the fiscal year ended February 24, 2001.


                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
April 19, 2001
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2409 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2409

          To decrease the statutory limit on the public debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 6, 2011

Mr. Broun of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To decrease the statutory limit on the public debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DECREASE IN STATUTORY LIMIT ON THE PUBLIC DEBT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United 
States Code, is amended by striking out the dollar limitation contained 
in such subsection and inserting in lieu thereof 
``$13,000,000,000,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on October 1, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2481 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exclusion 

for employer-provided dependent care assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2011 

Mr. YARMUTH (for himself, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, and Ms. BERKLEY) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the exclusion for employer-provided dependent care assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding Dependent 

5 and Child Care Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PRO7 VIDED DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

9 129(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2481 IH

1 to dependent care assistance programs) is amended by 

2 striking ‘‘$5,000 ($2,500’’ and inserting ‘‘$7,500 (half 

3 such dollar amount’’. 

4 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Paragraph (2) of sec5 tion 129(a) of such Code is amended by redesignating sub6 paragraph (C) as subparagraph (D) and by inserting after 

7 subparagraph (B) the following new subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(C) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the 

9 case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar 

10 year after 2012, the $7,500 amount in subpara11 graph (A) shall be increased by an amount 

12 equal to— 

13 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

14 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de15 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal16 endar year in which the taxable year be17 gins, determined by substituting ‘calendar 

18 year 2011’ for ‘calendar year 1992’ in sub19 paragraph (B) thereof. 

20 Any increase determined under the preceding 

21 sentence shall be rounded to the nearest mul22 tiple of $100.’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2481 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Order entered April 9, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00165-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.J.B., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-30017-2018

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s second motion to extend time to file her brief. We 

GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received April 5, 2019 filed as of the date of this 

order.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 262 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 262

    To require any amounts remaining in a Member's Representational 
 Allowance at the end of a fiscal year to be deposited in the Treasury 
                  and used to reduce the Federal debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2011

Mr. Scalise (for himself, Mr. Gingrey of Georgia, Mr. Peters, Mr. Ross 
of Florida, and Mr. Cravaack) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require any amounts remaining in a Member's Representational 
 Allowance at the end of a fiscal year to be deposited in the Treasury 
                  and used to reduce the Federal debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mandatory Returning of Allowances 
Act'' or the ``MRA Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING AMOUNTS REMAINING IN MEMBERS' REPRESENTATIONAL 
              ALLOWANCES TO BE USED TO REDUCE THE FEDERAL DEBT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 
amounts appropriated for Members' Representational Allowances for the 
House of Representatives for a fiscal year which remain after all 
payments are made under such Allowances for the year shall be deposited 
in the Treasury and used to reduce the Federal debt (in such manner as 
the Secretary of the Treasury considers appropriate).
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
fiscal year 2011 and each succeeding fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```