alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

**Exhibit 34.2**

** **

**Report of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

The Trust &Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche

Bank Trust CompanyAmericas:

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that the Trust & Securities Servicesdepartment of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (collectively the“Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission’s Regulation AB for the Honda Auto Receivables 2012-2 Owner Trust asset-backed securities transaction andthe Honda Auto Receivables 2013-3 Owner Trust asset-backed securities transaction (the “Platform”), except forservicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respectto the Platform, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2015. With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliancewith the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about theCompany’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordancewith the attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,on a test basis, evidence about the Company*’*s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performingsuch other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactionsand securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either priorto or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertionthat the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2015, is fairlystated, in all material respects.

 

/s/KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

May 29, 2015
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 23, 

2024. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00915-CV

SCANTRON ROBOTICS USA, INC., D/B/A SCIPHYN, Appellant

V.

BRISTOLA, LLC, JARED BURMA AND IAN DUNLAP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2023-25060

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from an order signed November 15, 2023. On June 25, 

2024, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The 

motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1370093
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3093929
<ALLOWANCES>                                    362412
<INVENTORY>                                    1298826
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5008068
<PP&E>                                         1773340
<DEPRECIATION>                                  643639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6621498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3378946
<BONDS>                                        2340231
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      13728662
<OTHER-SE>                                  (12826341)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6621498
<SALES>                                        1051569
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1374218
<CGS>                                           676989
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   818505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1929578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                147411
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              154681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1528546)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1528546)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1528546)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB



I, Paul C. Honda, do
hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation
(the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”
and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of July 24, 2013 among
the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2013-3 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2016, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
my hand this 16th day of May, 2016.



| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
| | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Paul C. Honda                                        | 
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Shankle, Appellant.

Submitted February 25, 2008;

decided March 13, 2008

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 denied as unnecessary and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2478 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

amounts received for services by a student at a work-college. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2011 

Mr. ROSKAM (for himself, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, and Mr. DAVIS of Illinois) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income amounts received for services by a 

student at a work-college. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS RECEIVED FOR SERVICES PROVIDED 

4 BY STUDENT AT WORK COLLEGE EXCLUDED 

5 FROM GROSS INCOME. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 117(c) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik8 ing ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (A), by striking the 

9 period at the end of subparagraph (B) and inserting ‘‘, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2478 IH

1 or’’, and by adding at the end the following new subpara2 graph: 

3 ‘‘(C) a comprehensive student work-learn4 ing-service program (as defined in section 

5 448(e) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

6 (42 U.S.C. 2756b(e))) operated by a work col7 lege (as defined in such section).’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall apply to amounts received in taxable 

10 years beginning after December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc; (the Company) on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Norbert Sporns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 12, 2009



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Norbert Sporns     
|Norbert Sporns         
|Chief Executive Officer
exv10w24





Exhibit 10.24




First Amendment

To

BorgWarner Inc. Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009)



Effective January 1, 2011, Section 4.3 of the the BorgWarner Inc. Board of Directors Deferred
Compensation Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) is hereby amended as follows:



Section 4.3 Timing of Deferral Credits. The percentage amount of a Retainer Fee that a
Participant elects to defer in the Deferral Election shall cause an equivalent reduction in the
amount of the Retainer Fee actually paid in cash to the Participant for that year. Retainer Fee
deferrals shall be credited to each Participant’s appropriate Deferred Benefit Account as of the
first Business Day of the calendar quarter immediately following the calendar quarter in which the
Retainer Fee was payable to the Participant. For example, a Retainer Fee payable to the
Participant during November will be credited to the Participant’s Deferred Benefit Account as of
the first Business Day of January. The amounts credited to the Participant’s deferred Benefit
Account will be allocated among the Investment Options elected by the Participant under Section
5.1.
#### Briggs Avenue LLC, Appellant, v Insurance Corporation of Hannover, Respondent.

Decided March 13, 2008

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2544 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2544

   To increase the statutory limit on the public debt, increase job 
  creation, and reduce projected medium and long-term Federal budget 
                           deficits and debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 2011

 Ms. McCollum introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To increase the statutory limit on the public debt, increase job 
  creation, and reduce projected medium and long-term Federal budget 
                           deficits and debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Don't Default on America's Debts and 
Destroy American Jobs Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN STATUTORY LIMIT ON THE PUBLIC DEBT.

    Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended by striking out the dollar limitation contained in such 
subsection and inserting in lieu thereof ``$16,700,000,000,000''.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that the Congressional recess scheduled 
for August 2011 should be cancelled and that Congress should remain in 
official session until legislation is passed to--
            (1) increase job creation and reduce unemployment; and
            (2) reduce projected medium- and long-term Federal budget 
        deficits and debt.
                                 <all>
```
ex102.htm







Leo Contracted a $25 Million Contract







Hanwha promised to sell 5,000 units of Leo’s e-Box in Europe







Las Vegas, Nevada, January 3 , 2012.  Leo Motors, Inc. (OTCQB:LEOM) made a substantial contract with Hanwha Corporation (http://www.hanwhacorp.co.kr) Leo appointed Hanwha as an exclusive distributor of e-Box in Europe. And as an exclusive distributor, Hanwha guaranteed minimum 5,000 units of e-Box amounting to approximately $25 million.







Hanwha is subsidiary of Hanwha group which ranks top 10 business conglomerates in Korea. It is actively investing in solar energy businesses.







According to Mr. John Lee, CEO of Leo Motors, “with this contract, Leo will supply 5,000 units of e-Box per annum, and this will make sales of $100 million. We upgraded our existing e-Box for safer and higher power storage.”







About Leo Motors







LEO MOTORS is a US public company based outside of Seoul, Korea, engaged in the development, manufacture and sale of Electric Vehicle (EV) power trains and components.  Leo has developed many original EV power trains and has converted many models of existing internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles into EVs, including scooters, motorcycles, highway speed sedans, buses and trucks.  Leo Motors has also developed Zinc Air Fuel Cell Generator (ZAFCG) which will free EV’s from range limitation with zero emissions.







Mike King


Princeton Research, Inc.


(702) 650-3000







Forward-Looking Statement







This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In addition to statements which explicitly describe such risks and uncertainties, readers are urged to consider statements labeled with the terms “believes,” “belief,” “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “will,” or “plans” to be uncertain and forward looking. The forward-looking statements contained herein are also subject generally to other risks and uncertainties that are described from time to time in the
company’s reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.







Source: Leo motors
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2426 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2426

 To amend title 23, United States Code, to limit claims in connection 
 with decisions to issue permits, licenses, and approvals for highway 
  and public transportation capital projects, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 6, 2011

   Mr. Long introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, to limit claims in connection 
 with decisions to issue permits, licenses, and approvals for highway 
  and public transportation capital projects, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ISSUANCE OF PERMITS, LICENSES, AND APPROVALS FOR HIGHWAY AND 
              PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROJECTS.

    Section 139(l) of title 23, United States Code, is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(l) Limitations on Claims.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, a decision of a Federal agency to issue a permit, license, 
        or approval for a highway or public transportation capital 
        project shall be final and shall not be subject to judicial 
        review. Nothing in this paragraph shall place any limit on 
        filing a claim that a person has violated the terms of a 
        permit, license, or approval.
            ``(2) New information.--The Secretary shall consider new 
        information received after the close of a comment period if the 
        information satisfies the requirements for a supplemental 
        environmental impact statement under section 771.130 of title 
        23, Code of Federal Regulations. The preparation of a 
        supplemental environmental impact statement when required shall 
        be considered a separate final agency action. Notwithstanding 
        any other provision of law, such an agency action shall be 
        final and shall not be subject to judicial review.''.
                                 <all>
```
### NUMBER 13 - 1 9 - 00 316 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF A.G. AND C.M.G, CHILDREN

.

____________________________________________________________ On a ppeal from the 3 98 th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## ORDER
Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Perkes Order Per Curiam Appellant Arthur Fred Garza appealed a default judgment establishing the parent

child relationship entered by the 3 98 th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas in cause number F

- 4874

- 18

- I

. We previously dismissed this appeal for want of prosecution because appellant failed to pay the filing fee for the appeal

. See In re A.G. , No. 13

- 19

- 00316

- CV, 2019 WL 4493704, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi

– Edinburg Sept. 19, 2019, no pet. h.) (mem. op.). Appellant has now filed a verified motion for reconsideration, rehearing, and reinstatement. According to appellant’s motion, he was entitled to2 proceed with th is appeal as an indigent who was excused from paying the filing fees, and the trial court clerk failed to forward the proper documentation establishing his indigency to this Court. The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's motion for rehearing is of the opinion tha t, in the interest of justice, appellant's motion for rehearing should be granted

. See generally T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 2, 20, 44.3. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion for rehearing and we withdraw our previous opinion and judgment. This appeal

r emains p ending before the Court and will proceed in accordance with the timelines established by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. It is so ORDERED. PER CURIAM D elivered and filed the 17th day of December , 20 1 9

.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, E. Kevin Hrusovsky, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Caliper Life Sciences,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize, and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2004

/S/ E. Kevin Hrusovsky
----------------------------------------
E. Kevin Hrusovsky, Chief Executive
Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Order entered January 15, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01446-CV

IN RE TASCA HOLDINGS, LLC, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-13564

ORDER

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus. 

/Ken Molberg/

KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE