alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
MARCH 31, 2000 YEAR-TO-DATE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS REPORTED ON FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY  BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001014920
<NAME>                        OPTIKA INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        14,545
<SECURITIES>                                   7,121
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,892
<ALLOWANCES>                                     134
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              25,941
<PP&E>                                         6,096
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                31,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,305
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          9,369
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           9
<OTHER-SE>                                    14,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  31,627
<SALES>                                        1,190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,827
<CGS>                                            142
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,634
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,904)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,904)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,904)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.99)



</TABLE>
#### Jan Leighton, Appellant, v Young Ja Kim Leighton, Respondent.

Submitted January 14, 2008;

decided February 12, 2008

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
### The Honorable R.E. Longstaff, United States District Judg e 1 

### for the Southern District of Iowa.



# United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3797

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa Kathleen Monica Starnes, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 3, 1997 Filed: May 1, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. KathleenStarnes appeals from the final judgment entered in th e District Court for the Southern District of Iowa following her guilty plea 1 to conspiring to comm it mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The dist rict court sentenced Starnes to 25 months imprisonment. For th e reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We reject Starnes's contention that the district court clearly erred in imposing a four-level aggravating-role enhancement for

### -2-

being an organizer of an extensive fraudulent scheme. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a) (1995) (court must increase defendant' s offense level if she was organizer or leader of criminal activity that involved five or mor e participants or was o therwise extensive); United States v. Scott , 91 F.3d 1058, 1063 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review). Starnes was president of a company for which i nvestments were obtained fraudulently; she recruited others to seek out investors; she made misrepresentations and caused other s to mak e misrepresentations knowingly and with the intent to defrau d investors; she participated in the scheme both directly and indirectly; an d investors lost more than $750,000.
As to Starnes's contention that enhancements for both role in th e offense and more than minimal planning constituted impermissible doubl e counting, this argument is foreclosed by United States v. Willis , 997 F.2d 40 7, 418-19 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 1050 (1994) . Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.2

      CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form
10-Q  for  the  period ending January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada, Corporate Controller
and  Principal  Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C,
ss.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

1)   the  Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2)   the  information  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
     the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the  Company.

By /s/ Antonio Estrada
Antonio Estrada
Corporate Controller and
Principal Financial Officer
March 15, 2004


<PAGE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 23 , 2024

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00915

- CV

SCANTRON ROBOTICS USA, INC., D/B/A SCIPHYN , Appellant

V.
BRISTOLA, LLC, JARED BURMA AND IAN DUNLAP , Appellee s

On Appea l from the 127th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2023

- 25060

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a n order signed November 15, 2023. On June 25, 2024, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42 .1

. T h e motion is granted.
We dismiss the appeal

.2 PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Halo 
Pharmaceutical, Inc.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 
1301.33(a) on or before November 17, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division 
(``Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, 
appendix to subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on July 
11, 2017, Halo Pharmaceutical, Inc., 30 North Jefferson Road, Whippany, 
New Jersey 07981 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer the 
following basic classes of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dihydromorphine........................     9145  I
Hydromorphone..........................     9150  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture Hydromorphone (9150) for 
distribution to its customers. Dihydromorphine (9145) is an 
intermediate in the manufacture of Hydromorphone and is not for 
commercial distribution.

    Dated: September 11, 2017.
Demetra Ashley,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-19834 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the fiscal 1998 Consolidated Financial Statements of Ameriking, Inc. and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-30-1998
<CASH>                                         11,584
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,662
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     2,237
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,706 
<PP&E>                                         53,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            277,684,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24,331
<BONDS>                                       164,144
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          35,546
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            9
<OTHER-SE>                                      7,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              217,684,000
<SALES>                                        71,128 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               71,128
<CGS>                                          22,569         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  63,662 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                4,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   41
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              4,008
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (435)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (131)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (304)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     (304)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.75)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             343
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (92)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          15,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,174
<SALES>                                         17,058
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,058
<CGS>                                           11,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,533
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  65
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,962
<INCOME-TAX>                                       756
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,206
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,206
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00034-CR

Larry Gene Sewell

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (0248756D)

May 21, 2015

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 16, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00803

- CV

Denise MCVEA

, Appellant

v.

James KISSLER, Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Cou rt, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 14927 Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The trial court clerk has filed a notification of late record stating that the clerk’s record has not been filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) days of

the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal wil l be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS W HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of January, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 35.1

VW Credit, Inc. Annual Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Section 7.11 of the Transaction SUBI Servicing Supplement

And Item 1123 of Regulation AB





VOLKSWAGEN AUTO
LEASE TRUST 2013-A

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of VW Credit, Inc. (VCI), as Servicer under the Transaction SUBI Supplement
2013-A to Servicing Agreement dated as of July 25, 2013 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Transaction SUBI Servicing Supplement), by and among VW Credit Leasing, Ltd., VCI, as
Servicer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as SUBI Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and of its performance under the Transaction SUBI Servicing Supplement was conducted under my
supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Transaction SUBI Servicing Supplement in all material respects throughout such period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this twenty-seventh day of March, 2015.



/s/ Horst MeimaHorst MeimaExecutive Vice President & CFO
EX-35.6
(logo) KeyBank


Statement of Compliance
August 1, 2013 - September 5, 2013 (the 'reporting period')


Re: JPM 2013-C13

I, Diane Haislip, in my capacity as Senior Vice President of KeyBank National
Association as successor by merger to KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets Inc.,
(KeyBank), do hereby state that:

* A review of the Special Servicing activities of KeyBank during the reporting
  period and of its performance, under the Agreement(s), has been made under my
  supervision, and,

* To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, KeyBank has fulfilled all
  of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
  reporting period.


By:

/s/ Diane Haislip
Diane Haislip, Senior Vice President

Date: March 11, 2014


KeyBank National Association
11501 Outlook Street, * Suite 300 * Overland Park, KS 66211
Toll Free (888) 979-1200 * Direct (913) 317-4100 * www.keybank.com
exv10w94






Exhibit 10.94




December 17, 2010




Rajat K. Gupta

McKinsey & Company, Inc.

3 Landmark Square

Suite 100, 21st Floor

Stamford, CT 06901




Dear Rajat:



          This will confirm the following agreement relating to the deferral of your director’s
retainers and fees for 2011.


          1. All director’s fees and retainer (“Fees”) payable to you in connection with your service on
the boards of directors (including committees of such boards) of AMR Corporation and American
Airlines, Inc. for the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011, will be deferred and paid
to you in accordance with this letter agreement.


          2. Fees will be converted to Stock Equivalent Units in accordance with the Procedures for
Deferral of Board Retainers and Fees, as amended and restated, a copy of which is attached hereto
as Exhibit A (the “Plan”).


          3. On the 30th business day after the date when you cease to be a Director of AMR Corporation
and any affiliates, and cease rendering services, the Stock Equivalent Units accrued pursuant to
the Plan will be converted to cash and paid to you in a lump sum by multiplying the number of such
Stock Equivalent Units by the arithmetic mean of the high and the low of AMR stock (“fair market
value”) during the month when you ceased to be a Director of AMR Corporation and any affiliates,
and cease rendering services. Payment cannot be accelerated.


          4. In the event of your death, the number of Stock Equivalent Units as of your date of death
will be multiplied by the fair market value of AMR stock during the calendar month immediately
preceding your death, and the amount paid to Anita Mattoo Gupta. The payment contemplated by this
paragraph 4 will be made on the 30th business day following the date of your death.



 









 







          If the foregoing is satisfactory to you, please indicate by signing one of the originals (two
are enclosed) and returning it to me.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,

 	 
	 	/s/ Kenneth W. Wimberly
 	 
	 	Kenneth W. Wimberly 	 
	 	Corporate Secretary 	 
	 



	 	 	 

	Accepted and agreed:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ Rajat K. Gupta
 

Rajat K. Gupta

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	12/20/10
 

Date
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Luis GUTIERREZ-CASAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-11818

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 16, 2008.

Howard C. Anderson, R. Fletcher Peacock, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

*939Karin B. Hoppmann, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before CARNES, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Howard C. Anderson, appointed counsel for Juan Luis Gutierrez-Casas in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gutierrez-Casas’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,249,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,261,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (552,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    505,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,449,000
<PP&E>                                      19,482,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (10,963,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,042,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,546,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    20,206,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,042,000
<SALES>                                     11,643,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,643,000
<CGS>                                        7,138,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,138,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,523,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,895,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   777,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,118,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,118,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

        Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Philip L.
Jones, as Chief Operating Officer of Profile Technologies, Inc., hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Profile
Technologies, Inc.


Date:  May 13, 2005                          /s/ Philip L. Jones
                                             -------------------
                                             Philip L. Jones
                                             Chief Operating Officer