alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
f1012ga2ex10i_europa7.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


Description of Verbal Management Consulting Agreement Between Europa Acquisition VI, Inc. and Peter Reichard.












On July 30, 2010, Mr. Reichard, the President and sole director of the Company, verbally agreed to provide funding to cover the costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations for the next 12 months and beyond, until the Company is engaged in business activities that provide cash flow sufficient to cover the costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations. We currently have no written contractual agreements in place with Mr. Reichard to provide such funding. During the next 12 months, Mr. Reichard has agreed to cover costs including, but not limited to, the filing of Exchange Act reports, and consummating an acquisition. At this time we do not have the funds to pay for these filings and do not have any written agreement to raise funds to cover these expenses. However, we believe we will be able to meet these costs with funds provided by Mr. Reichard. At such time that the Company has the ability to cover the costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations with cash flow from operations, Mr. Reichard will no longer be obligated to cover such costs.  The Company not currently undertaking any steps to repay Mr. Reichard, but the understanding is that he will be repaid when the Company is sold.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6606

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PAUL JAMES, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-70095, CA-99-808-7) Submitted: August 24, 2001 Decided: September 10, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul James, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Paul James seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. James , Nos. CR-97-70095; CA-99-808-7 (W.D. Va. filed Feb. 28, 2001; entered Mar. 1, 2001). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2587 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 173
112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2587

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2011

                     Received; read the first time

                           September 16, 2011

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To prohibit the National Labor Relations Board from ordering any 
     employer to close, relocate, or transfer employment under any 
                             circumstance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Jobs From Government 
Interference Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF THE NLRB.

    Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 160) 
is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``: 
Provided further, That the Board shall have no power to order an 
employer (or seek an order against an employer) to restore or reinstate 
any work, product, production line, or equipment, to rescind any 
relocation, transfer, subcontracting, outsourcing, or other change 
regarding the location, entity, or employer who shall be engaged in 
production or other business operations, or to require any employer to 
make an initial or additional investment at a particular plant, 
facility, or location''.

SEC. 3. RETROACTIVITY.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall apply to any complaint for 
which a final adjudication by the National Labor Relations Board has 
not been made by the date of enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 173

112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2587

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To prohibit the National Labor Relations Board from ordering any 
     employer to close, relocate, or transfer employment under any 
                             circumstance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 16, 2011

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew
Kang, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-4 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except
as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas.



By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as
Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization ofthe depositor)Date:

March 30, 2017
EXHIBIT 33.1





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA


FOR ASSET-BACKED ISSUERS





Ohio Power Company (the "Servicer"), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:





(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Phase-In-Recovery Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (3)(ii) (allocation and remittance), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), (4)(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), and (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);





(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;





(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2017 and for the period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and





(4) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent  registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2017 and for the period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.





Date: March 23, 2018





OHIO POWER COMPANY,


as Servicer








/s/ Lonni L. Dieck


Name:  Lonni L. Dieck


Title: Treasurer and Senior Officer in Charge of


the Servicing Function, Ohio Power Company, as Servicer
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,667,361
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,697,095
<PP&E>                                         403,296
<DEPRECIATION>                                 244,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,099,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          124,586
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,285
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,970,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,099,177
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,903
<CGS>                                            1,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  421,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (388,048)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (388,048)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (388,048)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)






</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         144,088
<SECURITIES>                                    76,525
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               273,432
<PP&E>                                         214,320
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 596,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,857
<BONDS>                                        350,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          302,151
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        83,953
<OTHER-SE>                                   (203,568)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   596,240
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,390
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,585)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,585)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,585)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.08)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CALIPER LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
T. Higgins, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and 18 U.S. C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

                                           /s/ THOMAS T. HIGGINS
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Thomas T. Higgins
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 10, 2005

                                      29
#### Shedd *v.*Washburn and others.

*(Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts,*

January 28, 1882.)

1. Letters Patent — Fasteners for Shutters — Validity.

Letters patent No. 166,819, for an improvement in fasteners for shutters, are not invalid for want of novelty.

2. Novelty — Utility—Extensive Use.

Extensive use is, of itself, some evidence of novelty and utility.

In Equity.

*Thos. H. Dodge,*for complainant.

*John L. S. Roberts,*for defendants.

Lowell, D. J.

The plaintiff describes and claims in his patent, No. 166,819, an improvement in fasteners for shutters, or blinds, made of wire, and fully shown in the drawings, and by a description which would hardly be intelligible without the drawings. The defendants make and sell this precise article; and the only question in the case is whether the plaintiff has a valid patent, no matter of how limited a scope. In my opinion, he may hold a narrow claim for the very article which he describes. Other fasteners for shutters and blinds had been made of a single piece of wire, but none which had the several elements of his claim similarly combined. The claim is for “a wire blind fastener, having a horizontal spring arm, A’, projecting end, G, inclined or brace arm, E’, intermediate coil spring, E, and horizontal eye, E; the same b,eing constructed and adapted to be applied to the blind or shutter, substantially as and for the purposes *905set forth.” The Haynes fastener, if earlier than the plaintiff’s, which is somewhat" doubtful, does not have a coil which operates like that shown in the patent; the Waterhouse exhibit does not have the inclined or brace arm, to any useful extent; the Orr fastener has no coil. All these earlier devices appear to have worked well, but the plaintiff’s changes were improvements, and brought his fastener into use extensively, which is, of itself, some evidence of novelty and utility. Decree for the complainant.
NO. 07-07-0140–CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	SEPTEMBER 27, 2007

	______________________________

	LANEKA JACOBS, 

									Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

									Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 52,483-B; HON. JOHN BOARD, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

					Memorandum Opinion

			       _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., CAMPBELL, J., and BOYD, S.J.1

	Appellant Laneka Jacobs appeals her conviction of possession of marijuana in an amount of 2,000 pounds or less but more than fifty pounds.  Pursuant to a plea of guilty but without an agreed recommendation of punishment by the State, the trial court found appellant guilty and assessed punishment at five years in prison and a fine of $8,000.  

	Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, together with an Anders2 brief wherein she certified that, after diligently searching the record, she has concluded the appeal is without merit.  Along with her brief, counsel attached a copy of a letter sent to appellant informing her of counsel’s belief and of appellant’s right to file a response pro se.  By letter dated July 12, 2007, this court also notified appellant of her right to file a brief or response and set August 13, 2007, as the deadline to do so.  Appellant sought an extension of time to file a response which was granted until September 24, 2007.  At that time, appellant filed a response.  

	In compliance with Anders, counsel has discussed several potential areas for appeal.  They include 1) the denial of appellant’s request for probation in light of the deferred adjudication received by her co-defendant, 2) the consideration by the court of an extraneous offense in assessing punishment and the lack of any pre-sentence investigation report, and 3) the voluntariness of  appellant’s plea.  However, counsel has explained why each argument lacks merit.

	Appellant has also asserted that her plea was involuntary and that she was not admonished as to her right against self-incrimination.  Nothing in the record indicates that appellant’s plea was not voluntary or that she was coerced into testifying.  The court is not required to admonish a defendant as to the right against self-incrimination when he or she voluntarily takes the stand to testify in his or her defense.  See  Lucero v. State, 91 S.W.3d 814, 819 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2002, no pet.) (Quinn, concurring). 

	We have also conducted our own review of the record to assess the accuracy of counsel’s conclusions and to uncover any error pursuant to Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  Our own review has failed to reveal any reversible error.  

	Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.

							Brian Quinn 

						          Chief Justice

Do not publish.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          31,494
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,939,365
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,818,919
<INVENTORY>                                  1,180,935
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,679,941
<PP&E>                                       2,185,298
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,152,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,007,075
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,385,775
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,655,196
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,755,597)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,007,075
<SALES>                                     14,541,826
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,798,894
<CGS>                                        6,577,916
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,319,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,870,794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             525,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,174,660)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,093,502
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,268,162)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,268,162)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)
        

</TABLE>