alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) LNR 

Partners, LLC

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the "Special Servicer"), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1.            Areview of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2014 and ending on December 31, 2014 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the "Reporting Period"), and of the Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

2.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all  of  its  obligations  under  the  applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liability company

 

 

By:          /s/ Job Warshaw

            Job Warshaw

            President 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dated:  February 23, 2015

 

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue ● Suite 700 ● Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 ● Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

 

 

 

Schedule I

 

GSMS 2013-GC13

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013- GC13

 

 

Fitch Rating 

One State Street Plaza, 31st Floor 

Attention: Commercial Mortgaged-Backed Securities Surveillance

New York NY 10004

General Contact

 

 

 

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

200 West Street

New York NY 10282

Joe Osborne

 

 

 

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

200 West Street

New York NY 10282

Leah Nivison

 

 

 

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

200 West Street

New York NY 10282

Peter Morreale

 

 

 

Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc.,

845 Third Avnue, 4th Floor 

Attention: CMBS Surveillance New 

York NY 10022

General Contact

 

 

 

Moody's Investors Service, Inc.

7 World Trade Center

250 Greenwich Street

Attn: Commercial Mortgage Surveillance Group

New York NY 10007

General Contact

 

 

 

TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., 

3424 Peachtree Street

NE, Suite 2200

Atlanta GA 30308

J. Gregory Winchester

 

 

TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., 

McKenna Long & Albridge LLP

303 Peachtree Street

Suite 5300

Atlanta GA 30308

Patrick M. McGeeham

 

 

 

U.S. Bank National Association

60 Livingston Avenue 

ATTN: Bondholder Services GSMS 2012_GC13

St. Paul MN 55107

Group
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
TeleSpectrum Worldwide Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Kurt Dinkelacker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Kurt Dinkelacker
---------------------------------------------
Kurt Dinkelacker
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
EXHIBIT 10.2

 

ENDORSEMENT TO 10% SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE

 

Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.
 New York, New York
 February 7, 2011

 

The 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note dated June 25, 2008 and amended December 11, 2008, June 25, 2010 July 26, 2010, September 15, 2010, October 15, 2010, November 15, 2010, November 30, 2010, December 1, 2010, December 3, 2010 and December 17, 2010, January 10, 2011 and January 24, 2011 (the “Note”) of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order of Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. (the “Holder”) in an aggregate principal amount of $275,000 and to which the Endorsement is affixed is hereby amended in the following respects:

 

1.                                       The term “Stated Maturity Date” is hereby restated to be “February 25, 2011.”

 

2.                                       Except as expressly amended by this Endorsement, the Note remains in full force and effect and the Company hereby reconfirms its obligations thereunder.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be duly executed, and the Holder has caused this Endorsement to be duly accepted, by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.

 

	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
PRECISION   OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By
    	
/s/   Richard E. Forkey
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   Richard E. Forkey
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Accepted:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
SPECIAL   SITUATIONS PRIVATE EQUITY FUND, L.P.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Adam Stettner
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:   Adam Stettner
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:   General Partner
EX-35.20
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884-2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.
270 Park Avenue,
New York, NY 10017


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
Certificate Administrator (in such capacities, "Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies
as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "reporting
period"):

(c) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its
    performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A
    hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision;
    and

(d) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled
    all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
    respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.


March 11, 2014


/s/ Brian Smith
Brian Smith
Vice President


(page)


To: J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

2. Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2013, by and among J.P.
   MORGAN CHASE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP, as Depositor, MIDLAND LOAN
   SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer,
   BERKADIA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LLC, as Special Servicer, and PENTALPHA
   SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
   Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent, Trustee and Custodian relating to
   the Series JPM 2013-C13 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
   relating to the IDS Center Whole Loan, a pari passu portion of which is
   included in the Series JPMC 2013-C12 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
   Certificates transaction.


(page)


To: J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

Schedule B

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

Not Applicable
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 13

- 00358

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF AMBER NICOLE SANCHEZ AND DAVID SANCHEZ AND IN THE INTEREST OF CHILDREN ,

From the 18th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. D201105907

MEMORANDUM OPINION

David Sanchez, a prison inmate, attempts to appeal a Final Decree of Divorce

rendered by the trial court on May 29, 2012 . Sanchez’ notice of appeal as to this
judgment was du e, at the very latest, by November 29 , 2012. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.1(c).

It was not filed until October 1 5 , 2013. This appeal is untimely, and w e have no jurisdiction of an untimely appeal. This
appeal is dismissed. 1

1 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is rendered. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this C ourt reviewed by the Texas Supreme Court, a petition for review must b e filed with the Texas Supreme Court clerk within 45In the Matter of the Marriage of Sanchez Page 2

Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the
time a document is presented for filing. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 12.1(b); Appendix to T EX

. R. A PP

.
P ., O rder Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). S ee also T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 5; 10 TH T EX

. A PP

. (W ACO ) L OC

. R. 5; T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . §§ 51.207(b); 51.208
(West Supp. 2012); § 51.941(a) (West 2005). Under these circumstances, we suspend the
rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 2.

The write

- off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates

or reduces the fees owed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before C hief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinio n delivered and filed October 17 , 2013 [CV06]

days after either the date the court of appeals’ judgment was rendered or the date the last ruling on all timely motions for rehearing was made by the court of appeals. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 53.7(a).
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43530-43531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19747]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


National Petroleum Council Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal 
Register on September 11, 2017, a notice of an open meeting for the 
National Petroleum Council. The notice is being corrected for the 
street address. Agenda items will stay the same.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of September 11, 2017, in FR DOC. 2017-
19096, on page 42664, make the following corrections:

[[Page 43531]]

    In the ADDRESSES heading, first column, first paragraph, first 
line, correct address to, ``800 Sixteenth Street NW.,''

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 12, 2017.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-19747 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20182 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO ESTRADA-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-100-ALL

-------------------- October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Antonio Estrada-Martinez (Estrada) appeals the 36-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment. Estrada acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States ,No. 01-20182 -2- 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001) . Estrada’s argument is foreclosed. Estrada also contends that the indictment is fatally defective, as a matter of constitutional law, for failing to allege general intent. This contention lacks merit. See United States v. Berrios-Centeno , 250 F.3d 294, 298-300 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , U.S. (U.S. Oct. 1, 2001) (No. 01-5535). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,850,331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               32,591,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                   677,226
<INVENTORY>                                  5,566,909
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,863,913
<PP&E>                                      86,288,626
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,423,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             152,428,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,319,589
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,246
<OTHER-SE>                                  79,274,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               152,428,200
<SALES>                                     38,586,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            98,827,057
<CGS>                                       27,584,333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               74,280,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,017,103
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,349,722
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,506,232
<INCOME-TAX>                                   912,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   594,232
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19831]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: AMPAC 
Fine Chemicals LLC

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 
1301.33(a) on or before November 17, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division 
(``Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, 
appendix to subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on August 
16, 2017, AMPAC Fine Chemicals LLC, Highway 50 and Hazel Avenue, 
Building 05001, Rancho Cordova, California 95670 applied to be 
registered as a bulk manufacturer of levomethorphan (9210), a basic 
class of controlled substance in schedule II.
    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance as 
an intermediate in the bulk manufacture of other controlled substances 
for distribution to its customers.

    Dated: September 11, 2017.
Demetra Ashley,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-19831 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### Hartford *against*Palmer.

A witness, state of intosinottobesmSn! ”0

coutt before ced, may decide from its own view, witness is in that height mated.be ad"

jy^tprived^f memory and or who arc labouring nnder a temporary privation of them, when offered to testify, are not admisnible witnesses.

IN ERROR, on *certiorari*to a Justice’s Court.

In this case a verdict and judgment were rendered for the defendant below, on which the plaintiff below brought a *certiorari;*and the only question arising on the return was, whether the justice ought to have refused to swear a witness, who was, when offered to testify, in a state of intoxication.

. *Per Lunam.*

... , We are of opinion, that the justice decided correctly in refusing to swear the witness. *Peake*lays down this general proposition, which cannot fail to command the assent of all mankind, “ that all persons who are examined as witnesses, must be fully possessed of their understanding, *144that is, such an understanding as enables them to retain in memory the events of which they have been witnesses, and gives them a knowledge of right and wrong; that, therefore, *idiots*and lunatics, while under the influence of their malady, not possessing this share of understanding, are excluded.” This principle, necessarily, excludes persons from testifying, who are besotted with intoxication, at the time they are offered as witnesses; for it is a temporary derangement of the mind ; and it is impossible for' such men to have such a memory of events, of which they may have had a knowledge, as to be able to present them, fairly and faithfully, to those who are to decide upon contested facts. A present and existing intoxication, to a considerable degree, utterly disqualifies the person so affected, to narrate facts and events in a way at all to be relied on. It would, we think, be profaning the sanctity of an oath, to tender it to a man who had no present sense of the obligations it imposed. Indeed, it would be a scandal to the administration of justice, to allow, for a moment, the rights of individuals to be jeopardized by the testimony of any man labouring under the beastly sin of drunkenness. The return, does not state the degree of intoxication which the justice Considered sufficient to exclude the witness ; but we are to presume, that it was evident and palpable ; and every Court must necessarily have the power to decide, from their own view of the situation of the witness offered, whether he be intoxicated to such a degree, as that he ought not to be heard; nor can this lead to any improper consequences ; for if the witness was not so intoxicated, the justice would be responsible in an action for a false return. We cannot withhold our approbation of the firmness which the magistrate has evinced on this occasion, in refusing to administer an oath to a witness thus circumstanced.

judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-64167) pertaining to the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and in
the Registration Statement (From S-8 No. 333-57781) pertaining to the 1997 Stock
Option Plan and the 1998 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Election Plan and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-88426 and No. 333-27835) pertaining to
the 1994 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form No.
333-27831) pertaining to the 1996 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and
the 1992 Outside Directors' Director Stock Unit Plan, of GTECH Holdings
Corporation of our report dated March 23, 1998, with respect to the financial
statements of Camelot Group plc as of January 31, 1998, and February 1, 1997,
and for the years ended January 31, 1998, and February 1, 1997, which is
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of GTECH Holdings Corporation for the
fiscal year ended February 27, 1999.

Price Waterhouse
London, England
May 10, 1999
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00343-CV

__________________

SAM-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC, Appellant

V.

MARICELA SALAZAR-LINARES, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARTIN LINARES-SEGURA, 

Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 163rd District Court

Orange County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B190455-C

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SAM-Construction Services, LLC, Appellant, filed an unopposed motion to 

dismiss this accelerated appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellant filed the 

motion before the appellate court issued a decision in the appeal. We grant the 

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 21, 2022

Opinion Delivered December 22, 2022

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Andrew J. Olson, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant for the purposes of the filing of the Report, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

|   | /s/ Andrew J. Olson |
|--------|---------------------|
| Name:  | Andrew J. Olson     |
| Date:  | March 12, 2018      |