alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 245 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 245

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to remove the mandate on the Board of 
  Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market 
               Committee to focus on maximum employment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2011

  Mr. Pence introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Reserve Act to remove the mandate on the Board of 
  Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market 
               Committee to focus on maximum employment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF DUAL MANDATE.

    Section 2A of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 225a) is amended 
by striking ``maximum employment, stable prices,'' and inserting 
``stable prices''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of Zunicom, Inc. and Subsidiary (the
"Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),I, William Tan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. (SS) 1350,
as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;
                     and

                (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                     all material respects, the financial condition and results
                     of operations of the Company,


/s/ William Tan
--------------------
William Tan
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)

August 14, 2008



























                                Exhibit 32.1 - 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the NHLBI Special Emphasis Panel.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Sex Hormone Induced Thromboembolism in Pre-Menopausal Women.                     

*Date:*                         October 11, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kristen Page, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7185, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-7953,                         *kristen.page@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 12, 2017.

 Michelle Trout, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-19729 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2422 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 45 Bay Street, Suite 2, in Staten Island, 

New York, as the ‘‘Sergeant Angel Mendez Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2422 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT ANGEL MENDEZ POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 45 Bay Street, Suite 2, in Staten 

4 Island, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Sergeant Angel Mendez Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Angel 

10 Mendez Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 14, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40742

Summary Calendar

 

AUDWIN JACOBS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PORT NECHES POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL.,

Defendants,

CITY OF PORT ARTHUR TEXAS; JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:94-CV-767

- - - - - - - - - -

August 17, 1999

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Audwin Jacobs appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of Jefferson County in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

civil rights lawsuit alleging malicious prosecution in favor of

Jefferson County. Jacobs does not brief any argument in

connection with the district court’s judgment in favor of the

City of Port Arthur and other defendants and those claims are

therefore waived. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 
No. 98-40742

-2-

(5th Cir. 1993)(arguments not briefed on appeal are abandoned);

Fed. R. App. P. 28(a). 

Jacobs has failed to provide competent summary judgment

evidence that an official custom or policy or the ratification of

an unofficial custom or policy led to his alleged malicious

prosecution. See Monell v. Dep’t. of Soc. Servs. of City of New

York, 436 U.S. 658, 694 (1978); Scott v. Moore, 114 F.3d 51, 54

(5th Cir. 1997). The competent summary-judgment evidence

demonstrates that there was no official policy or custom of

malicious prosecution during the time in question so this claim

fails. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986);

King v. Dogan, 31 F.3d 344, 346 (5th Cir. 1994).

Jacobs has failed to demonstrate any error in connection

with the district court’s judgment. Accordingly, it is AFFIRMED. 

Jacobs’ motion to dismiss the City of Port Arthur and other

defendants is DENIED as moot. See Yohey 985 F.2d at 224-25.

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED AS MOOT.
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2471 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend section 2710 of title 18, United States Code, 

to clarify that a video tape service provider may obtain 

a consumer’s informed, written consent on an ongoing 

basis and that consent may be obtained through the 

Internet. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2471 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. 

2 Section 2710(b)(2) of title 18, United States Code, 

3 is amended by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘(B) to any person with the informed, written 

6 consent (including through an electronic means 

7 using the Internet) in a form distinct and separate 

8 from any form setting forth other legal or financial 

9 obligations of the consumer given at one or both of 

10 the following times— 

11 ‘‘(i) the time the disclosure is sought; and 

12 ‘‘(ii) in advance for a set period of time or 

13 until consent is withdrawn by such consumer;’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Willie Ralph RAY, to his own use and to the Use of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. COMPANIA NAVIERA CONTINENTAL, S.A., a body corporate, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff (Robert C. Herd *&*Co., Inc., and Grace Lines, Inc., Third-Party Defendants).

Civ. No. 11025.

United States District Court D. Maryland.

March 23, 1960.

*212Amos I. Meyers, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff.

John H. Skeen, Jr., and Skeen, Wilson & Coughlin, Baltimore, Md., for Compañía Naviera Continental, S. A.

Southgate L. Morison and David Ross, Baltimore, Md., for Grace Lines, Inc.

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

This is a civil action for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by an accident on defendant’s vessel, the S. S. Transyork, which occurred in *February,*1958. The question presented by the pending motion is whether defendant can bring a third-party complaint under Rule 14(a), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., against Grace Lines, Inc., alleging that “some or all of the disability claimed by plaintiff in the complaint in this action against defendant” is attributable to an injury alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff in *November,*1958, as a result of the negligence of Grace Lines, Inc., and the unseaworthiness of its vessel, the S. S. Santa Barbara, on which plaintiff was then employed as a seaman.

Rule 14(a) permits impleader only when the third-party is or may be liable to the defendant for all or part of the plaintiff’s claim against him. It does not authorize impleader in such a case as this. Where the maritime law or applicable state law provides for a substantive right of contribution between joint tort-feasors, Rule 14(a) provides the procedure for its enforcement. 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., sec. 14.11; Russell, Poling & Co. v. United States, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 140 F.Supp. 890, 1956 A.M.C. 1106. But defendant and Grace Lines, Inc., are not joint tortfeasors.

Defendant argues: “Without Grace Line in the case, defendant Naviera will undoubtedly become victim of an award intended to compensate plaintiff for the total effect of his injuries. No one seriously believes that Naviera can, as a practical matter, be protected against this event by the Court’s instructions.” I do not agree that the Court’s instructions are so ineffective; if they prove to be so in this case, defendant will not be without remedy. In any event, defendant’s argument would not justify the Court’s exceeding the authority granted by Rule 14(a).

The motion of Grace Lines, Inc., to dismiss the third-party complaint as against it is hereby granted.
# Continuation of the Exercise of Certain Authorities Under the Trading With the Enemy Act

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of the Treasury

                    Under section 101(b) of Public Law 95-223 (91 Stat. 1625; 50 U.S.C. 4305 note), and a previous determination on September 13, 2016 (81                     *FR*                     64047, September 16, 2016), the exercise of certain authorities under the Trading With the Enemy Act is scheduled to expire on September 14, 2017.                

I hereby determine that the continuation of the exercise of those authorities with respect to Cuba for 1 year is in the national interest of the United States.

Therefore, consistent with the authority vested in me by section 101(b) of Public Law 95-223, I continue for 1 year, until September 14, 2018, the exercise of those authorities with respect to Cuba, as implemented by the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515.

                    The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2017-19522

Billing code 4811-33-P
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 2- 10 87 6 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 0 :1 1- cr-6 02 59 -WPD-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l l Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us RAMIR O BETANCUR-VALENCIA, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e So ut he rnDis tri ctof F lo rid a __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (J ul y 17 , 20 12 ) Befo re CARNES, WILSON andBLACK, Cir cu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM:

Case: 12-10876 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 1 of 3Ram iro Bet an cu r-Val en ci a ap pe al s t he sen te nc in g c ou rt’s d en ia l o f a t wole ve l re du ct io n t o h is off

en se lev el un de r U.S.S.G. § 3 B1 .2(b )’s m in or -ro le pr ov is io n. We revi ew th e d is tri ctco urt’s d en ia l o f a m in or -ro le reduc ti on for cle ar erro r. Uni te d Sta te s v. De Va ro n, 17 5 F .3d93 0, 9 37 (11 th Cir . 19 99 ) (en ba nc ) . A def en da ntm us t p ro ve by a prep on de ran ce o f th e ev id en ce t ha t h e is en ti tl edto m in or -ro le reduc ti on . Id. at 9 39 . Whe n e va lu at in g t he pro pr ie ty of a m in or -ro le reduc ti on , th e d is tri ctco urt s ho ul d c on si de r th e d efen da nt ’s rol e in th e rel ev an t co nduc t fo r whi ch he ha s b een he ldacco un tabl e atsen te nc in g, an d h is ro le as c om

pa redto th atof o th er p art ic ip an ts in th e rel ev an t co nduc t. Id. at 9 40 . Inth e dru g c ou rie r co nt ex t, d is tri ctco urts sh ou ldco ns id er t he am ou ntof d ru gs , th ei r fai r m ark etva lu e, th e am ou ntof m on ey pa idor p ro m is edto th e co ur ie r, an y equi ty int eres t t he co ur ie r m ig htha ve in th e dru gs , th e co ur ie r’s ro le in pl an ni ng th e sc he m e, an d t he co ur ie r’s ro le in di st rib ut io n. Id . at 9 45 . Howev er, i n the fin al an al y si s, the de ci si on of wh et he r a dru g c ou rie r qu al ifi es fora m in or -ro le reduc ti on “ fal ls withi n t he so un d d is cret io n o f th e tr ia l co urt.” Id . Here, t he di st ric t co urt p ro pe rly app li edth e an al yti cal fram ewo rksetou t i n De Var on . The d is tri ctco urt re li edon th e am ou ntof d ru gs sm ug gl edin te rn al ly by Bet an cu r-Val en ci a, th e rem un erat io n p ro m is edto hi m , andhi s p art ia ll y su cces sf ul effo rts to ev ad e ap pr eh en si on as p ro of of ahe ig ht en edco m

pl ic it y in co m pa ti bl e 2 Case: 12-10876 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 2 of 3wit h t he m in or -ro le reduc ti on . The d is tri ctco urt d idno t cl earl y err b y reject in g a m in or -ro le reduc ti on . Accor di ng ly, we affi rm Bet an cu r-Val en ci a’s se nt en ce. AFFIRMED .

3 Case: 12-10876 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 3 of 3
| (logo) Rialto 

CAPITAL |  

  |
|-------------------------|----------------|

 

 

 

 

2014 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

                 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of  June 1, 2013  by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC, as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee relating to the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C14, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C14  **(WFRBS 2013-C14)**

 

                

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

4.        All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

5.        A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

6.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

 

 

Certified by:  /s/  Adam Singer                                                                        Date:  March 5, 2015

       Adam Singer, Managing Director
ex1056to1012g07663_02072011.htm


Exhibit 10.56


 








 







 







 


Ernest K. Jacquet                                                                                                                                                                             February 8th, 2011


2600 N. Flagler Dr.


#909


West Palm Beach


FL 33407







Robert Stec


CEO and President


Passport Brands, Inc.


252 W. 37th Street


New York, NY 10018







Dear Bob







This Letter will confirm our agreement to extend all the Bridge Notes payable to me from Passport Brands Inc. (formerly I.C. Isaacs & Co.) that are overdue on the attached Exhibit “A” to March 31, 2011.


 




	
Sincerely

	
Agreed:


	  	  
	  	  
	/s/ Ernest K. Jacquet	/s/ Robert Stec
	
Ernest K. Jacquet

	
Robert Stec


	  	
CEO and President


	  	
Passport Brands Inc.









 




  





  











  






 


Exhibit “A”







 


PASSPORT BRANDS, Inc. Bridge Notes to Ernest K. Jacquet


 


On November 11, 2010 the Company issued a bridge note to a Ernest Jacquet in the amount of $400,000 which is due on December 31, 2010 and bears interest at the rate of 10%. In addition, the stockholder receives a financing fee of 10% upon payment of the note. On February 3, 2011, a partial payment of $20,000 was made on this note.


 


On December 1, 2010 the Company issued a bridge note to a Ernest Jacquet in the amount of $140,000 which is due on December 31, 2010 and bears interest at the rate of 10%. In addition, the stockholder receives a financing fee of 10% upon payment of the note.


 


On December 28, 2010 the Company issued a bridge note to a Ernest Jacquet in the amount of $220,000 which is due on January 31, 2011 and bears interest at the rate of 10%. In addition, the stockholder receives a financing fee of 10% upon payment of the note.


 


On December 30, 2010 the Company issued a bridge note to a Ernest Jacquet in the amount of $130,000 which is due on January 31, 2011 and bears interest at the rate of 10%. In addition, the stockholder receives a financing fee of 10% upon payment of the note.


 


On January 14, 2011 the Company issued a bridge note to a Ernest Jacquet in the amount of $100,000 which is due on January 31, 2011 and bears interest at the rate of 10%. In addition, the stockholder receives a financing fee of 10% upon payment of the note.


 


On January 20, 2011 the Company issued a bridge note to a Ernest Jacquet in the amount of $50,000 which is due on January 31, 2011 and bears interest at the rate of 10%. In addition, the stockholder receives a financing fee of 10% upon payment of the note.


 


On January 26, 2011 the Company issued a bridge note to a Ernest Jacquet in the amount of $117,000 which is due on February 28, 2011 and bears interest at the rate of 10%. In addition, the stockholder receives a financing fee of 10% upon payment of the note