alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2474 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2474

To authorize a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction at West 
   Onslow Beach and New River Inlet (Topsail Beach), North Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2011

 Mr. McIntyre introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction at West 
   Onslow Beach and New River Inlet (Topsail Beach), North Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WEST ONSLOW BEACH AND NEW RIVER INLET (TOPSAIL BEACH), NORTH 
              CAROLINA.

    The Secretary of the Army is authorized to carry out a project for 
hurricane and storm damage reduction at West Onslow Beach and New River 
Inlet (Topsail Beach), North Carolina substantially in accordance with 
the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in the West Onslow 
Beach and New River Inlet (Topsail Beach), North Carolina: Report of 
the Chief of Engineers dated September 28, 2009, at a total cost of 
$47,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $30,000,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $17,000,000, and at an estimated total 
cost of $252,000,000 for periodic beach nourishment and monitoring over 
the 50-year economic life of the project, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $125,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $127,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19563]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM01-5-000]


Electronic Tariff Filings; Notice Regarding Footnotes, Headers, 
or Footers in Tariff Text in the Commission's E-Tariff System

    Take notice that the Commission's electronic tariff system 
(eTariff) does not reproduce footnotes, headers, or footers in the 
Real-Text-Format (RTF) tariff text posted on the Commission's Web site 
(http://etariff.ferc.gov/TariffList.aspx).\1\ To the extent footnotes, 
headers or footers are needed in tariff text, filers should enter them 
separately in the body of the document on each page where needed rather 
than by using automatic features of the word processing program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ This applies to footnotes created programmatically by the 
word processing software, such as the Insert Footnote Tool in 
Microsoft Word, and text added to the header or footer areas of a 
document, such as using the Insert Header or Footer Tool in 
Microsoft Word or clicking in the header or footer areas of the 
document.

    Dated: September 6, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19563 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Fidel HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-72435.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007 **.

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Noam Mendelson, Daly City, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Angela N. Liang, Trial Attorney, San Francisco, CA, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Fidel Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion *986for issuance of a subpoena in a removal case. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion an IJ’s decision not to issue a subpoena for the production of a witness. *See Kaur v. INS,*237 F.3d 1098, 1099 (9th Cir.2001). We review de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings. *See Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition for review.

The IJ did not abuse his discretion in denying Hernandez’s request to subpoena his U.S. citizen daughter Fidelina’s doctor to testify, because Hernandez failed to demonstrate that the doctor’s testimony was essential. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.35(b)(3) (IJ shall issue a subpoena upon being satisfied that the witness’ evidence is essential). The BIA properly concluded that Hernandez failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by the IJ’s refusal to issue the subpoena. *See Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 20, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41707

Summary Calendar

 

PAUL D. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

J.B. SMITH, Sheriff,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:03-CV-88

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Paul D. Williams, Texas prisoner # 1149568, appeals the

dismissal of his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief

can be granted. Williams contends that the defendant denied him

access to the courts while he was a pretrial detainee at the

Smith County Jail.

The record reflects that counsel was initially appointed to

represent Williams in his criminal proceeding. Williams relieved
No. 03-41707

-2-

appointed counsel and he retained counsel. Insofar as Williams

may seek to challenge the guilty-plea process, he has no claim. 

See Degrate v. Godwin, 84 F.3d 768, 769 (5th Cir. 1996). Insofar

as Williams asserts that he sought access to the jail’s law

library to pursue habeas relief relating to the denial of his

bond-reduction motion, we uphold the magistrate judge’s dismissal

of that claim on the alternative ground that the record reflects

that Williams suffered no prejudice from any such denial. See

Sojourner T. v. Edwards, 974 F.2d 27, 30 (5th Cir. 1992). In

light of the extensive criminal history listed in Williams’

inmate classification record and his status as a registered sex

offender, any further attempts to have his bond lowered would

have been futile.

Based on the foregoing, the judgment of the district court

is AFFIRMED. The district court’s dismissal of Williams’

complaint counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). 

Williams is WARNED that if he accumulates three strikes, he may

not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed

while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is

under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Ju ly 2 8 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk Ju ly 28 , 2017

154819 (58)

HARMONY MONTESSORI CENTER,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

SC: 154819

v COA: 326870

Tax Tribunal: 00

- 370214

CITY OF OAK PARK,

Respondent

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of respondent

- appellee to extend the time

for filing its supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted

as tim ely filed if submitted on or before August 23, 2017

. The same extension is given to

petitioner

- appellant to file its supplemental brief.
Converted by EDGARwiz


INFORMAL AGREEMENT WITH COMPANY PRESIDENT




The Company’s President has been loaning funds to the Company.  The Company’s President has verbally agreed that for the next twelve (12) months, in the event that the Company raises only a portion of the Offering amount, to loan the Company up to $10,000 per month to assist in start-up operations.   




Because there are no agreed upon terms for the repayment of any funds loaned to the Company, the loans, when made should be considered payable on demand.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Trust 2013-LC12 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to beprovided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included inthe Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial RealEstate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search,LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asSpecial Servicer for the White Marsh Mall Mortgage Loan, U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Trustee for the White Marsh Mall Mortgage Loan, PentalphaSurveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor for the White Marsh Mall Mortgage Loan,CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing FunctionParticipant for the White Marsh Mall Mortgage Loan, and National Tax Search,LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the White Marsh Mall Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 20,2020

 

 

/s/ AnthonySfarra

 

 

President

(senior officerin charge of securitization of the depositor)
|    |                                                                                                               |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc.; |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
| Date:  | April 24, 2020 | /s/ AVRAHAM SHEMESH |
|   |   | Name: | Avraham Shemesh |
|   |   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors(Principal Executive Officer) |
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase CommercialMortgage Securities Corp. 

383 Madison Avenue

31st Floor

New York, New York 10179

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-C14, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C14

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of August 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6938

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

THOMAS J. MACWILLIAMS, a/k/a Greg, a/k/a Cpl. George,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. John Preston Bailey, 

Chief District Judge. (1:06-cr-00059-JPB-JSK-1; 1:12-cv-00140-

JPB-JSK)

Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 25, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas J. MacWilliams, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Angus Morgan, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas J. MacWilliams seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that MacWilliams has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Paul GAGNON, Pedro Valenzuela, Donald P. Storms, Glenn E. Martin, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 82-1289, 82-1310, 82-1311 and 82-1350.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 2, 1985.

Negatu Molla, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.

Robert S. Wolkin, Stephen C. Villarreal, Micahel L. Piccarreta, Davis, Siegel & Gug-ino, L. Anthony Fines, Tucson, Ariz., for defendants-appellants.

Before WISDOM,* SKOPIL and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Hon. John Minor Wisdom, Senior Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

*1325ORDER

In accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court in *United States v. Robert Paul Gagnon, et al.,*— U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1482, 84 L.Ed.2d 486 (1985), the judgment of convictions of all the defendants is

AFFIRMED.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.
SKYLER COBURN , Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3741

Opinion filed November 14, 2014.

Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

. Skyler Coburn, pro se , Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Res pondent.

PER CURIAM.
The petition seeking a belated appeal of the judgment and sentence rendered on
March 26, 2014, in Clay County Circuit Court case number 2012

- CF

- 001991 is
granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the
clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. If petitioner qualifies for
the appointment of counsel at public expense, the lower tribunal is directed to appoint
counsel to represent him in the belated appeal authorized by this opi nion.
PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ. , CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19976]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XF694


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) 
Ecosystem and Ocean Planning (EOP) Committee with Advisory Panel (AP) 
will hold a public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday October 6, 2017. The meeting 
will begin at 10 a.m. and conclude no later than 3 p.m. The meeting 
will be held via webinar with a telephone-only connection option. For 
agenda details, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: Information about connecting to this webinar based meeting 
will be posted on the Council Web site at www.mafmc.org two weeks prior 
to meeting.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331 or 
on their Web site at www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to review the 
final list of risk elements to be evaluated by the Council as part of 
its Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management. At this meeting, the 
EOP Committee and Advisors will provide final rankings of the risk 
elements that will be communicated to the full Council at its October 
meeting in Riverhead, NY. Once adopted, the prioritized risk matrix 
will be used by the Council to inform its future work and scientific 
research plans.

    Dated: September 14, 2017.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-19976 Filed 9-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Exhibit 3.1
 
 Jim C. Nicholas
 
 
 
 RE:
    
    $5,000,000.00 Revolving Line of Credit for letters of credit from JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
(Chase) to STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.(Borrower); Line letter agreement
dated January 31, 2010 (as amended, Agreement)
     1.
    
    Section 1.1 of the Agreement is amended to insert April 30, 2011 in place of January 31,
2011 where the latter appears (defining the Termination Date).
 2.
    
    Section 1.1 of the Agreement is further amended to insert April 30, 2014 in place of
January 31, 2014 where the latter appears (stating the longest expiry date permitted without
discretionary consent).
    THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND GOVERNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
AND AS APPLICABLE THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
  Sincerely yours,JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.By:

/s/
LINDSAY SCHELSTRATEName:
    Lindsay SchelstrateTitle:

Assistant
Vice President Accepted and agreed:STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.By:

/s
DAVID J. COLLINSName:
    David J. CollinsTitle:

Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A.   