alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE GRAND PRIX ASSOCIATION OF LONG BEACH, INC.
AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      10,250,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  760,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     63,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,799,000
<PP&E>                                      20,012,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,830,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,625,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      (1,563,000)
<BONDS>                                   (22,930,000)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      (2,500,000)
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                  (15,544,000)
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,206,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              (46,625,000)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,566,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,668,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (206,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (86,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (120,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (120,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DEVIN L. SMITH, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4316 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 5, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; William Fuente, Judge. Charalampos G. Demosthenous of The Demosthenous Law Firm, Tampa, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bilal Ahmed Faruqui, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
KELLY, SLEET, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

AS PELEUS, A DELAWARE LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY

v.

ALSON ALSTON, UNITED STATES C/O

US ATTORNEY

PETITION OF: ALSON ALSTON :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 17 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of March , 201 7

, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED

.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                           GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GTECH Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending February 22, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the "Report"), I, W.
Bruce Turner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C section 1350, as adopted pursuant to sections 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                        GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

Date: April 25, 2003                    By /s/ W. Bruce Turner
                                           ---------------------------------
                                        W. Bruce Turner
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the Research, Engineering & Development Advisory Committee meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on October 11, 2017—9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Bessie Coleman Conference Center (FOB 10A, Second Floor), Washington, DC 20591.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chinita A. Roundtree-Coleman at (609) 485-7149 or email at                         *chinita.roundtree-coleman@faa.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Research, Engineering and Development (RE&D) Advisory Committee. The meeting agenda will include time allocated to discuss recommendations provided by the advisory committee to the FAA on research and development investments in the areas of air traffic services, airports, aircraft safety, human factors and environment and energy. Attendance is open to the interested public but seating is limited. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to attend the meeting, present statements, or obtain information should contact the person listed in the                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the Committee at any time.                

Issued in Washington, DC on September 13, 2017.

Chinita A. Roundtree-Coleman,

Computer Specialist.

[FR Doc. 2017-20130 Filed 9-20-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
James Norman 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 26, 2015

No. 04-15-00189-CR, 04-15-00190-CR and 04-15-00191-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

James Norman EVANS,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5623, 5624, and 5643

Honorable Robert R. Barton, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On August 14, 2015, appellee filed a letter stating that he mistakenly omitted from his 

brief cover a request for oral argument. We construe appellee’s letter as a motion to amend 

appellee’s brief cover to request oral argument. The motion is GRANTED, and appellee’s brief 

cover is amended to show that appellee requests oral argument.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of August, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43002-43003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19548]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Monday, September 18, 2017, 1:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, MD.

[[Page 43003]]


STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered: Briefing Matter: Fiscal Year 2018 Operating 
Plan. A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at https://www.cpsc.gov/live.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Rockelle Hammond, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: September 11, 2017.
Alberta E. Mills,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19548 Filed 9-11-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
#### Atwood *against*Austin,

courtlo'prove file dt1meCthat desesperase! allowed toen! ter into it, al though he was not present, when the trial commenced, Where a defendant in a Justice’aCourt,

IN ERROR, on *certiorari*to a Justice’s Court. The defendant in error brought an action in the Court below against the plaintiff in error, in which issue was joined. At the time appointed for the trial, the Justice called the parties, but the plaintiff only appeared. While the examination of the plaintiff’s witness was going on, the defendant below came in, and the examination having been *J*° completed, he offered a witness to prove his defence; but * . . _ the Justice told him, that his detault had been entered, and that he could not hear his defence unless the plaintiff consented. The plaintiff refused to consent, and judgment was rendered in his favour.

*Per Curiam.*

The proceeding was severe and. unjust. The trial was not, in fact, delayed by the defendant; he came in time to prove the only defence which he had set. up, yiz. : payment; and he offered a witness to prove it, immediately after the plaintiff rested his cause.

Judgment reversed, (a).

(a)

**Vide *Sweet*and another v. Coon, 15 Johns. Sep. 86.
## NUMBER 13

- 1 8

- 00 044

- CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JAMES LOVERDE, M.D.

, A ppellant

,

v.

REGIONAL EMPLOYEE

ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 13 th District Court

of Navarro County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez

Appellant , James LoVerde, M.D., filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the

13th District Court of Navarro County, Texas, in cause number D

- 16

- 24991

- CV

. 1

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See T EX . G OV ' T C ODE A NN . § 73.001 (West , Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S. ).2 Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties

have entered into an agreement resolving the dispute between the parties. Appellant

requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellant ’ s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is

hereby DISMISSED

. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d)

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

/s/ Rogelio Valdez

ROGELIO VALDEZ

Chief Justice

Delivered and filed the

19 th day of April, 201 8

.
No. 14- 14 -01010- CR In the Court of Appeals For the Fourteenth District of Texas At Houston
 No. 1448705 In the 189th Judicial District Court Of Harris County, Texas
 EX PARTE ANTONIO McGUIRE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee
 STA TE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF
 TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
THE STATE OF TEXAS, pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2 & 10.5, moves for
an extension of time in which to file its appellate brief and in its motion, would
show the Court the following:

1. The appellant was charged with two felony offenses, tampering with
evidence and possession of a controlled substance

. The indictment
included enhancement paragraphs alleging appellant had been twice
previously convicted of aggravated assault

. After a hearing, the trial court

denied appellant’s writ of habeas corpus requesting a reduction in bail.
Appellant filed notice of appeal. ACCEPTED 14-14-01010-cr FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/11/2015 10:49:46 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK2. The State’s brief is due March 11 , 2015. The State hereby requests a n

extension for the filing of the State’s brief until April 11 , 2015

.

3. The following facts are relied upon to show good cause for a n extension

of time to allow the State to file its brief :
The State has been working on and has filed the f ollowing briefs in the last thirty days.

Ronald Robinson v. T h e State of Texas 1

- 14

- 006560

- CR State ’ s Brief filed February 11, 2014

Artivious Deon Hollins v. The State of Texas No. 1

- 14

- 00 744

- CR State’s Brief filed March 4 , 2015
Allison Leigh Campbell No. 1

- 14

- 00 807

- CR State’s Brief filed March 11 , 2015

Furthermore , the undersigned attorney has been assigned the following briefs in addition to the brief in this cause number

. Kanivious Dorsey 1

- 14

- 00685

- CR State ’ s Brief d ue March 13, 2015
Phaoc Le Hung 14

- 14

- 00043

- CR State ’ s Brief d ue March 27, 2015
Christopher Jackson 14

- 14

- 00472

- CR State ’ s Brief due March 27, 2015

4. This is the State’s first request for an extension of time to file its brief.WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant the requested

extension.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kimberly Stelter K IMBERLY S TELTER Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002

- 1923 (713) 755

- 5826 Stelter_Kimberly @dao.hctx.net TBC No. 19141400

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument will be served by efile.txcourts.gov to:

Randall J. Ayers Attorney at Law P.O. Box 1569 Houston, Texas 7725 1 rjayerslaw @ comcast.net

/s/ Kimberly Ste lter K IMBERLY S TELTER Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002

- 1923 (713) 755

- 5826

Date : March 11, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TELESPECTRUM
WORLDWIDE INC.'S 1997 THIRD QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             APR-12-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0                  30,715
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,861                  32,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,462                     583
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,302                  66,721
<PP&E>                                          56,155                  32,081
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,156                   1,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 300,404                 299,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,424                  48,445
<BONDS>                                         39,992                   4,199
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           252                     252
<OTHER-SE>                                     228,938                 240,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,404                 299,055
<SALES>                                        149,576                  17,295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,576                  17,295
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161,367                  16,022
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 810                   (321)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,601)                   1,594
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,400)                     638
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,201)                     956
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,201)                     956
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.44)                    0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)                    0.07
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2635 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2635

 To amend title 31, United States Code, to suspend the Presidential $1 
Coin Program when coin stockpiles are sufficient to meet the needs for 
                   one year, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2011

 Mr. Polis (for himself and Ms. Speier) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 31, United States Code, to suspend the Presidential $1 
Coin Program when coin stockpiles are sufficient to meet the needs for 
                   one year, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cutting Out Inefficient and Needless 
Spending Act of 2011'' or the ``COINS Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF PRESIDENTIAL $1 COIN PROGRAM DURING SURPLUS.

    Section 5112(n)(8) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 
adding on the end the following: ``The Secretary shall suspend issuance 
of coins under this subsection during any period for which the 
Secretary determines that the surplus supply of $1 coins exceeds the 
reasonable circulation needs for one year.''.

SEC. 3. REMOVAL OF UNMIXED SUPPLIES REQUIREMENT.

    Section 5112(p)(3)(D) of title 31, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ``ensuring that'' and all that follows through ``(ii) 
circulating coins'' and inserting the following: ``ensuring that 
circulating coins''.
                                 <all>
```
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-88,966-01

EX P ARTE JUAN G . LERMA, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 2016-DCR- 02335-B IN THE 138 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM CAM ERON COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 7 ). Applicant was convicted of possession of marihuana and sentenc ed to two y ear s’ imprisonment in a state jail fac ility

. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends, among other things, that h is trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use counse l assured A

pplicant that his g uilty

plea would not re sult in i ncar cer ation. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Moody , 991 S.W .2d 856, 857–58 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these2

circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of i neff ective assistance o f co u n s el. The trial court may

use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I f t he trial court elects t o hold a hearing , it shall deter mine whether Applicant i s indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr es en t ed by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusion s o f l aw as to whether the perf ormanc e of App l i ca n t’s trial counsel was defic ient and, if so, whether counsel’s defic ient perf ormanc e prejudice d Applicant. The trial court shall make specific finding s of fac t de termining whether counsel promised Applicant he would rec eive a community supervision sentenc e and, if so, whether Applicant would have chosen a jury trial but for counsel’s assura nces. The trial court shall also make a

ny other finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law that it de ems rele vant and a ppropriate to the dispositi on of Applica nt’s claim for ha

beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A sup p l em en t al t ranscript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order. A ny extensions of ti me must be re quested by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court.

Filed: October

24, 20183

Do not publish