alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         198,763
<SECURITIES>                                    76,525
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               327,175
<PP&E>                                         175,630
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 614,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,333
<BONDS>                                        350,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          291,353
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,290
<OTHER-SE>                                   (156,316)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   614,210
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,601
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,902
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,348)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,348)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,348)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         612,953
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  390,971
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (31,154)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      17,704,957
<DEPRECIATION>                             (8,630,093)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,779,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          797,168
<BONDS>                                     10,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,982,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,779,845
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,840,578
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,155,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               461,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             702,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (478,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (478,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (478,324)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.88)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(b)


CFO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350


I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that the accompanying Form 10-QSB of CN Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company


/s/ Michael T. Storm

Michael T. Storm
Chief Financial Officer
August 10, 2004


                                       24


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          49,362
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,842,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,052,170
<INVENTORY>                                  1,486,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,519,572
<PP&E>                                       2,641,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 919,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,888,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,769,227
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,525,000
<COMMON>                                    15,560,211
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,400,928)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                      2,163,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,428,176
<CGS>                                        1,129,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,386,410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,220,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                44,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             142,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (303,874)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (303,874)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (352,473)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (656,347)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Commissioner of Social Services of Ulster County, on Behalf of Diann F. Montgomery, Respondent, v Kenley Powell, Appellant.

Submitted January 7, 2008;

decided February 12, 2008

*738Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*9 NY3d 975 (2007)].
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT (23)(d)



                           Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-76347) pertaining to Employee Savings and Incentive Plan of
Consumers Energy Company and in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No.
333-73922 and Form S-4 No. 333-111220) of Consumers Energy Company and in the
related Prospectuses of our report dated February 27, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Consumers Energy Company and
subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2003.

                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Detroit, Michigan
March 9, 2004



..
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 11, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00436-CV
THE JAGO TIMES GROUP PUBLICATIONS, LLC, AND RAJA A. KHANZADA, Appellants V. ANWER CHUGTAI, Appellee
On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-09353



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans Before the Court is appellant s’ “Notice of Voluntary Dismissa l by Agreement” informing
the Court that the parties have “have resolved their difference s and have agreed to nonsuit all
claims against each other with prejudice.” We construe appella nts’ notice as a motion to dismiss
this appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

190436F.P05 /David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

THE JAGO TIMES GROUP PUBLICATIONS, LLC AND RAJA A. KHANZADA, Appellants

No. 05-19-00436-CV V.
ANWER CHUGTAI, Appellee On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-09353. Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. Justices Molberg and Rei chek participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

. Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellee ANWER CHUGTAI recover his costs of this appeal from appellants THE JA GO TIMES GROUP PUBLICATIONS, LLC AND RAJA A. KHANZADA.

Judgment entered December 11, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,751,069              17,738,044
<SECURITIES>                                18,619,516              40,197,407
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,296                 669,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  28,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,577,645              58,905,584
<PP&E>                                       2,130,158               1,925,602
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,892,291              66,164,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,461,317               9,292,483
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0              23,052,787
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       366,651                 344,575
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,054,935              32,760,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,892,291              66,164,057
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,137,950              12,624,934
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,247,740              34,020,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             161,385                 327,304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,505,349)            (22,381,725)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.40)                  (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)                  (0.66)



</TABLE>
* The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 7 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

CURTIS D. HORNE, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. G. L. HERSHBERGER, ADX Warden; DR. C.A. STRATMAN, Clinical Director; B. JETT, Medical Administrator, Defendants - Appellees. No. 97-1173 (D.C. No. 97-D-72) (District of Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , BALDOCKand LUCERO , Circuit Judges.

Curtis D. Horne, a federal prisoner, appeals the di strict court’s denial of his pro se civil rights complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). In his complaint, Mr. Horne alleged that defendants violat ed the Eight Amendment to- 2 -

the United States Constitution by being “deliberate ly indifferent” to the “serious medical need” posed by his hemorrhoids. See Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 104-06. The district court denied Mr. Horne the relief he s ought. Judge Daniel found that appellant was proceeding in forma pauper is, then dismissed Mr. Horne’s complaint sua sponte under the amended fede ral in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), as legally friv olous and for failing to state a claim upon which relief might be granted. Reviewing the materials submitted by Mr. Horne, we are convinced that for the reasons it stated, the district court was corre ct to find his claim frivolous and legally insufficient. But the district court appea rs to have erred in finding that appellant was proceeding in forma pauperis. The re cord before us indicates that Mr. Horne paid the full filing fee on 31 January, 1 997. Thus, the district court erred in relying on 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to dismiss the appellant’s action. However, this administrative error is of no consequence. We may affirm the district court on any grounds supported by the record. See United States v. Sandoval , 29 F.3d 537, 542 n.6 (10th Cir. 1994). A district court may dismiss a claim sua sponte when, as here, “it is patently obvious that the pla intiff could not prevail on the facts alleged.” McKinney v. Oklahoma Dept. of Huma n Servs. , 925 F.2d 363, 365 (10th Cir. 1991) (internal quotation and citati on omitted). For the reasons- 3 -

stated by the district court, the allegations conta ined in Mr. Horne’s complaint are entirely insufficient to support his claim. AFFIRMED . The mandate shall issue forthwith. ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        111,2000
<SECURITIES>                                   191,671
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     98,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,179,824
<PP&E>                                       1,647,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,564,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,019,650
<BONDS>                                      1,313,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  6,000,000
<COMMON>                                       103,984
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,756,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,564,333
<SALES>                                      2,092,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,092,605
<CGS>                                        1,721,648
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,721,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,448,753
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             306,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,336,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,336,009)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 34.1




ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA FOR


ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


ON BEHALF OF OHIO POWER COMPANY, AS SERVICER




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




Board of Directors and Shareholder of


Ohio Phase-In-Recovery Funding LLC


Columbus, Ohio




We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Asset-Backed Issuers, that Ohio Phase-In-Recovery Funding LLC, (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Senior Secured Phase-In-Recovery Bonds, Series A-1 and A-2, (the "Securities”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, excluding criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)(l)(iii), l122(d)(l)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix),1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), l 122(d)(4)(xiii), and l122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Securities. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.




Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Securities, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in the Securities. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.




In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 for the Senior Secured Phase-In-Recovery Funding Bonds, Series A-1 and A-2, is fairly stated, in all material respects.




/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP




March 28, 2014


Columbus, Ohio
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         September 12, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 6, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 348 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2017-184, CP2017-285.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-19269 Filed 9-11-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 97-40143 

_____________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

JESSE GEORGE TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:96-CR-22-21)

______________________________________________________

April 13, 1998

Before GARWOOD, DAVIS and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this direct criminal appeal Taylor argues that the district

court erred by:

1. sentencing him based on distribution of crack

cocaine instead of powder cocaine;

2. allowing Taylor’s post-guilty plea statements to

be used at sentencing to establish his base offense

level; 

3. allowing a co-conspirator’s hearsay statement to

be used at sentencing to establish his base offense

level.
2

After reading the briefs and reviewing pertinent portions of

the record, we are persuaded that the district court committed no

reversible error.

AFFIRMED.