alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

        Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Henry E.
Gemino, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of Profile
Technologies, Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Profile Technologies, Inc.


Date:  February 14, 2005                        /s/ Henry E. Gemino
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Henry E. Gemino
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51036

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VICTOR TALAVERA-ROSAS, also known as

Javier Rivas-Mesa,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-499-1

--------------------

Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Victor TalaveraRosas raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8

U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-88676, 333-09565, and 333-157384 on Form S-8 of First Keystone Financial, Inc. and Registration No. 333-141970 on Form S-3 of First Keystone Financial, Inc. of our report
dated December 18, 2009, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Keystone Financial, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2009.

LOGO

Wexford, PA

December 18, 2009
#### Matter of the Supplementary Proceeding: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Judgment-Creditor, v. Merthen POTTER and Winifred Potter, Defendants and Judgment-Debtors.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

March 26, 1956.

Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, New York City, Edwin J. Wesely, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff and judgment-creditor.

BICKS, District Judge.

The Gramatan National Bank & Trust Company of Bronxville, New York, recovered a money judgment in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against Merthen Potter and Winifred Potter. Supplementary proceedings were thereafter instituted in that Court and in due course closed. The judgment, subsequently assigned to the United States of America, still remains unpaid and unsatisfied.

The United States Attorney has submitted a proposed order directing the judgment debtors to appear in this Court for examination in supplementary proceedings and enjoining them from disposing of any of their property until further order of this Court.

The Government urges that by virtue of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1345 which vests the District Court with original jurisdiction of all civil actions, suits or proceedings commenced by the United States, the United States may maintain supplementary proceedings in this Court in aid of said judgment. It would transform the judgment to a judgment of this Court for the purpose of supplementary proceedings without first having reduced the same to judgment here.

The Government’s brief argues in terms of jurisdiction whereas the problem is whether the process of this Court may be invoked in aid of a State Court judgment. Rule 69(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., is not to be construed as applying to judgments other than those of the Federal Court. The rule provides that, except as any statute of the United States governs, procedure on execution and proceedings supplementary to and in aid of a judgment shall be in accordance with the practice and procedure of the state in which the district court is held. It provides for conformity of procedure *90in enforcing judgments of the Federal Court to state practice but does not constitute the Federal Court an arm of the State Court with respect to collection of its judgments. See 7 Moore, Federal Practice, § 69.03(2); 3 Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 1481; United States v. Fairbank Realty Corp., D.C.E.D.N.Y.1943, 50 F.Supp. 373, affirmed on other grounds sub nom. Rottenberg v. United States, 2 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 151; see also former Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 727.

The proposed order submitted by the Government is returned unsigned.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2579 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2579

 To require the Corps of Engineers to take into account all available 
     hydrologic data in conducting Missouri River basin operations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2011

Ms. Jenkins (for herself and Mr. Terry) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Corps of Engineers to take into account all available 
     hydrologic data in conducting Missouri River basin operations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF ALL AVAILABLE HYDROLOGIC DATA.

    Effective beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, shall 
take into account all available hydrologic data in conducting Missouri 
River basin operations.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135315 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135315 

 COA: 280929 

Kent CC: 06-010318-FH 

SHIRLEY MARIE WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 31, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

0211 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 19, 2008 

 Clerk
ITEM 23
                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our  reports  included  in  this  Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration  Statement  File  No.  33-8445.

/s/  ARTHUR  ANDERSEN  LLP

Los  Angeles,  California

April  12,  2000



SIGNATURES

     Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of  Section  13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its  behalf  by  the  undersigned  thereunto  duly  authorized.


Dated:  April  14,  2000           OMNI  NUTRACEUTICALS,  INC.

                                By:  /s/  KLEE  IRWIN
                                     Klee  Irwin
                                     CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER

     Pursuant  to  the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report  has  been  signed  below  by  the  following  persons  on  behalf of the
registrant  and  in  the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated.

      SIGNATURE                      TITLE                        DATE
     ---------                       -----                        ----

     /s/KLEE  IRWIN             Chief  Executive  Officer     April  14,  2000
     --------------
     Klee  Irwin


     /s/  ANDREW VOLLERO, JR.   Director                      April  14,  2000
     -------------------------
     Andrew  Vollero,  Jr.


     /s/  ALBERT  KASHANI       Director                      April  14,  2000
     --------------------
     Albert  Kashani


     /s/  CHRISTOF  BALLIN      Director                      April  14,  2000
     ---------------------
     Christof  Ballin


     /s/  JOHN  FOSTER         Controller                    April  14,  2000
     -----------------
     John  Foster              Acting  Chief  Financial
                               Officer
#### GREGORY v. PIKE.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

October 23, 1896.)

No. 195.

Appeal — Decree Pursuant to Mandate.

An appeal Irom a decree entered in a circuit court pursuant to a mandate from the circuit court of appeals should not be entertained by the latter court when no errors are assigned as to any matters arising subsequent to the mandate, or when permission for appeal was not obtained or asked of the appellate court. In re Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co., 20 O. O. A. Ill, 73 Fed. 908, followed.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

This was a suit originally brought in the supreme judicial court of Massachusetts by Charles A. Gregory against Frederick A. Pike and others to compel the surrender of certain notes. The case was removed to the United States circuit court. In a supplemental bill filed by complainant, additional parties were made defendants, and, by amendment, after the decease of Charles A. Gregory his executrix, Mary II. Pike, was made defendant. The facts out of which the controversy arose are fully stated in 15 C. C. A. 33, and 67 Fed. <837. Appeals from the decree of the circuit court were taken *to*the circuit court of appeals, and that court made an order directing the form of the final decree. The case was remanded to the circuit court with a mandate requiring the entry of the; decree in conformity with the order. From the decree entered by the circuit court, plaintiff appealed.

Francis A. Brooks, for appellant.

John Lowell and Thomas II. Talbot, for appellee.

Before PUTNAM, Circuit Judge, and WEBB and ALDRICH, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal, allowed by the circuit court from a decree entered in that comí pursuant to a mandate from this court; and we are now asked by ihe appellee, Mary H. Pike, to dismiss it. It is now said that the decree in the circuit court departs from the mandate in some particulars. The departures were not assigned as errors. No errors were assigned as to anything arising subsequent to the judgment of this court on which the mandate issued, nor was the permission of this court for the present appeal ob tained or asked. Therefore the; principles announced by us in Re Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co., 20 C. C. A. 111, 73 Fed. 908, and in Re Pike, where our opinion was passed down September 17, 1896 (76 Fed. 400), govern this case, and compel us to conclude that this appeal will not lie. The appeal is dismissed, with costs in this court for Mary H. Pike incidental to her motion to dismiss.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2660 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2660

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2011

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 122 North Holderrieth Boulevard in Tomball, Texas, as the ``Tomball 
                        Veterans Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TOMBALL VETERANS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 122 North Holderrieth Boulevard in Tomball, Texas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Tomball Veterans Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tomball 
Veterans Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 16, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ina V. Kurz, Appellant.

Submitted March 10, 2008;

decided March 25, 2008

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no civil appeal lies from the order entered in this criminal action *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5601; CPL 450.70, 450.90).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000856711
<NAME> SUN SPORTSWEAR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,006,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,148,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                    46,317
<INVENTORY>                                 23,631,358
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,468,005
<PP&E>                                     10,904,0830
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,072,089
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,315,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,048,691
<BONDS>                                        247,996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,618,339
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,400,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,315,106
<SALES>                                     93,965,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            93,965,325
<CGS>                                       84,569,855
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               98,533,938
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,066,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,267,442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,635,074)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,898,620)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,736,454)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,736,454)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 21-40815 

Summary Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Danilo Jose Galo-Lopez, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:21-CR-1057-1 

Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

 Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Danilo Jose 

Galo-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Galo-Lopez has not filed a response. 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

April 8, 2022 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 21-40815 Document: 00516273267 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/08/2022
No. 21-40815 

2 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 21-40815 Document: 00516273267 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/08/2022
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 5, 2018

No. 04-18-00413-CV

Bill SEMMLER as Representative of Marynell Semmler,

Appellants

v.

John R. LANDER and Kimberly Lander,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-09-0838-CVA

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On July 3, 2018, appellant responded to this court’s June 28, 2018, by providing written 

proof that the fee for preparing the reporter’s record was paid. In her notification of late record, 

the court reporter stated she anticipated completing the record within five to seven days. It is 

therefore ORDERED that the reporter’s record be filed in this appeal no later than July 16, 2018.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of July, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [DA 17-849]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This document extends the filing deadline for the first priority filing window for eligible full power and Class A television stations to file applications for alternate channels or expanded facilities to September 15, 2017.

# DATES:

September 13, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Erin Griffith, 202-418-2957,                         *Erin.Griffith@fcc.gov,*                         or Kevin Harding, 202-418-7077,                         *Kevin.Harding@fcc.gov,*                         Video Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Technical issues briefly interrupted access to the Media Bureau's Licensing and Management System (LMS), which stations use to file construction permit applications and reimbursement cost estimate information. Recognizing the importance of first priority filing window, the filing window will now close at 11:59 p.m. EDT on Friday, September 15, 2017.

Federal Communications Commission.

Thomas Horan,

Chief of Staff, Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 2017-19419 Filed 9-12-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 
 **ICONIX
        BRAND GROUP, INC.**
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**
 **THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Neil
        Cole,
        President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 (1)
          The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934; and
  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.
  
 
 /s/
        Neil
        Cole
 -------------------------------------
 Neil
        Cole
 President
        and Chief Executive Officer
 
 March
        21,
        2006