alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15291 and #15292; TEXAS Disaster Number TX-00488]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Texas (FEMA-4332-DR), dated 09/04/2017.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Harvey.                    

*Incident Period:*                         08/23/2017 and continuing.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 09/12/2017.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/03/2017.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/04/2018.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Texas, dated 09/04/2017, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Bee, Refugio                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2017-19970 Filed 9-19-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50194 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JULIO ORTIZ-GONZALEZ, also known as Jorge Barrientos-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1441-ALL-DB

-------------------- August 23, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Julio Ortiz-Gonzalez appeals the 70-month term of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of illegally reentering the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Ortiz-Gonzalez argues that his sentence should not have exceeded the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Ortiz-Gonzalez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S.No. 01-50194 -2- 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). OrtizGonzalez’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 31.1

I, Michael C. Mauer, Chief Executive Officer of CM Finance Inc certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CM Finance Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this 8th day of September 2015.



|    |  |                                         
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    Michael C.
Mauer                 
|    |  | Michael C. Mauer
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
       
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                 SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                9-MOS
<CASH>                                                         6,338,367
<SECURITIES>                                                  18,446,031
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  1,002,127
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      45,027
<INVENTORY>                                                      427,026
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       0
<PP&E>                                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                37,385,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  0
<BONDS>                                                       10,279,888
<COMMON>                                                           1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    15,533,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  37,385,533
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              16,769,709
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 11,285,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             2,930,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                2,553,396
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     895,685
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            1,657,711
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   1,657,711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.25
        




</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2010

d0322 

# Order

March 29, 2010

140002

DAVID GILLIE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140002 COA: 287869 Genesee CC: 05-081012-CH GENESEE COUNTY TREASURER and GENE L. WHITE, Defendants-Appellees,

and

BARRY D. FLOYD and KAREL J. FLOYD, Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 6, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
[938 NYS2d 872]

#### Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Respondent, v Sigmund Rand, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department, 9th and 10th Judicial Districts,

December 5, 2011

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Sigmund, Rand,*appellant pro se. *Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP,*Woodbury *(Stephen C. Giametta*of counsel), for respondent.

*53OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover the principal sum of $3,513.27 for breach of a credit card agreement and based on an account stated. Plaintiff alleged in the complaint that it is the owner and assignee of a consumer debt owed by defendant upon a credit card account. Defendant served an answer wherein he asserted “[Recoupment and setoff in the sum of $2,000,000” as his affirmative defense and counterclaim. Plaintiff moved to dismiss the counterclaim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. By order entered June 18, 2010, the District Court granted plaintiffs motion and denied defendant’s cross motion.

On appeal, defendant contends that the assignment of the claim violated the doctrine of champerty under Judiciary Law § 489 (1), and that the counterclaim should not have been dismissed for failure to state a cause of action.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the assignment of the claim to plaintiff did not violate the doctrine of champerty *(see*Judiciary Law § 489). A corporation that takes an assignment of a claim does not violate Judiciary Law § 489 (1) if the “primary purpose of the transaction is to enforce a legitimate claim, or if the party obtaining the claim or debt does so as part of a larger transaction and the intent to commence litigation is incidental to that larger transaction” *(SB Schwartz & Co., Inc. v Levine,*82 AD3d 742, 743 [2011]; *see Trust for Certificate Holders of Merrill Lynch Mtge. Invs., Inc. Mtge. Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1999-C1 v Love Funding Corp.,*13 NY3d 190, 200 [2009]). In the instant case, defendant failed to establish that the primary purpose of the assignment of the claim to plaintiff was to commence litigation. The documentary evidence established that plaintiff sought to negotiate a payment plan with defendant. Thus, litigation was merely an incident to the larger transaction *(see Fairchild Hiller Corp. v McDonnell Douglas Corp.,*28 NY2d 325, 330 [1971]; *SB Schwartz & Co., Inc.,*82 AD3d at 743). Consequently, the court properly denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

With respect to so much of the order as granted plaintiffs motion to dismiss the counterclaim on the ground that the counterclaim failed to state a cause of action, we agree with the court’s determination. While the counterclaim is an indorsed *54pleading *(see*UDCA 902) and the only substantive pleading requirement of such an indorsed pleading is that it shall set forth the “nature and substance of the cause of action” (UDCA 902 [a] [1]), this requirement was not satisfied here.

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

Tanenbaum, J.E, Nicolai and Molía, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Christopher M. Mathieu, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant for the purposes of the filing of the Report, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 /s/ Christopher M. MathieuName:Christopher M. MathieuDate:March 4, 2020
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-09-00053-CV

SIGNAD, LTD,

Appellant

v.

JAMES BRAY,

Appellee

From the 12th District Court

Madison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 08-11626-012-10

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment. We 

abated this appeal in order for the trial court to state its intent as to whether or not the 

judgment entered was final for purposes of appeal. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 

S.W.3d 191, 206 (Tex. 2001). The trial court has entered an agreed order stating that the 

order previously entered by the trial court is not a final judgment for purposes of 

appeal. Accordingly, this Court does not have jurisdiction over this appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(a). Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
SignAd, Ltd. v. Bray Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed April 14, 2010

[CV06]
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43454-43455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19635]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control

Sanctions Actions Pursuant to Executive Order 13581

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of persons whose property and 
interests in property have been unblocked pursuant to Executive Order 
13581 of July 24, 2011, ``Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal 
Organizations.''

DATES: OFAC's actions described in this notice were effective on April 
6, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Department of the Treasury's 
Office of Foreign Assets Control: Assistant Director for Licensing, 
tel.: 202-622-2480, Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 
202-622-4855, Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance &

[[Page 43455]]

Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490; or the Department of the Treasury's 
Office of the Chief Counsel (Foreign Assets Control), Office of the 
General Counsel, tel.: 202-622-2410.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The list of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN 
List) and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are 
available from OFAC's Web site at http://www.treasury.gov/ofac.

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On April 6, 2017, OFAC removed from the SDN List the persons listed 
below, whose property and interests in property were blocked pursuant 
to Executive Order 13581.

Individuals

    1. HANRAHAN, Siobhan Ann, Shannon Airport House, Shannon Free Zone, 
Shannon, County Clare, Ireland; Meadow View, Clonlohan, Newmarket-on-
Fergus, County Clare, Ireland; DOB May 1972 (individual) [TCO] (Linked 
To: PACNET HOLDINGS LIMITED; Linked To: PACNET SERVICES LTD.; Linked 
To: PACNET CONNECTIONS LIMITED; Linked To: PACNET SERVICES (IRELAND) 
LIMITED; Linked To: AEROPAY LIMITED; Linked To: PACNET EUROPE; Linked 
To: PACNET GROUP).
    2. MACBAIN, Donna Maria, Parkshot House, 5 Kew Road, Richmond, 
Surrey TW9 2PR, United Kingdom; DOB 01 Feb 1979 to 28 Feb 1979; 
nationality United Kingdom (individual) [TCO] (Linked To: COUNTING 
HOUSE SERVICES LTD.; Linked To: PACNET SERVICES LTD.; Linked To: PACNET 
GROUP).

    Dated: April 6, 2017.
Andrea Gacki,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2017-19635 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
```
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5thCir. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 01-60793

_____________________
LINDA NICHOLS; TANYATAMEIKA JACKSON; BENNIE SMITH; VICKI MCNEIL, Plaintiffs - Appellees,
versus CITY OF CANTON, MISSISSIPPI; ET AL., Defendants, CITY OF CANTON, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant - Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No.3:00-CV-110-LN

_________________________________________________________________ March 18, 2003 Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * After consideration of the briefs, the oral arguments, and the record in this case and, in particular, after having reviewed National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Morgan , 536 U.S. 101 (2002), we are convinced that the plaintiffs’ claims were not time-barred and that the jury’s finding of liability in this case should notbe disturbed. We agree with the appellants that in some

instances the district court allowed unfairly prejudicial evidence against the city into the record. We have thoroughly considered these evidentiary errors and have concluded that they were harmless in the light of the overwhelming relevant evidence that supports the verdict. Finally, given the egregious nature of the conduct of Canton Police Chief Milton Luckett and the severe and pervasive hostile work environment that his actions created, we are slightly surprised that the amount of the damage awards was no greater – the surprisingly low amount perhaps attributable to the skill of the city’s attorneys. Nevertheless, based on our somewhat-varying precedents upholding damage awards, we cannot say that the jury’s award of damages was unreasonable. Consequently, the jury verdict and the judgment of the district court are, in all respects, AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of George P. Alessio, Jr., Appellant-Respondent, v Paul G. Carey, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 17, 2008;

decided March 25, 2008

Motion by appellant-respondent Alessio for leave to appeal denied. Motion by appellant-respondent Alessio for a stay dismissed as academic. Motion by respondent-appellant Carey for leave to appeal denied.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20002]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10209--Beach First National Bank, Myrtle Beach, South 
Carolina

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for Beach First National Bank, Myrtle 
Beach, South Carolina (``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its 
receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of 
Beach First National Bank on April 9, 2010. The liquidation of the 
receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by 
available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making 
a final dividend payment to proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

    Dated: September 15, 2017.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-20002 Filed 9-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Letterhead of:
Williams & Webster, P.S.
601 W. Riverside, Suite 1970
Spokane, WA 99201



Board of Directors of
Ramex Synfuels International, Inc.
Spokane, Washington

We consent to the use of our audit report dated March 2, 2000 on the
financial  statements  of  Ramex Synfuels  International, Inc. as of
January 31, 2000  for filing with and attachment  to the  Form 10-K
report for  the year ended January 31, 2000.


/s/ Williams & Webster, P.S.

Williams & Webster, P.S.
Certified Public Accountants
Spokane, Washington
March 13, 2000