alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS TWELVE MONTHS YEAR-TO-DATE SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM AMERICAN BIOGENETIC SCIENCES, INC. 1997 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,121,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    296,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,000
<PP&E>                                       1,992,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,481,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,388,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          497,000
<BONDS>                                      2,208,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,662,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,388,000
<SALES>                                        150,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,000
<CGS>                                           32,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,242,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             915,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,147,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,147,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,147,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.35)
        

</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2642 

To prohibit the disposal of certain Department of Veterans Affairs land 

and improvements in the Hudson Valley Healthcare System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2011 

Ms. HAYWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the disposal of certain Department of Veterans 

Affairs land and improvements in the Hudson Valley 

Healthcare System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hudson Valley VA 

5 Health Care System Campus Protection Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2642 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISPOSAL OF CERTAIN DEPART2 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS LAND AND IM3 PROVEMENTS IN THE HUDSON VALLEY 

4 HEALTHCARE SYSTEM. 

5 (a) MONTROSE VAMC.—The Secretary of Veterans 

6 Affairs may not declare as excess to the needs of the 

7 Franklin Delano Roosevelt Campus of the Department of 

8 Veterans Affairs Hudson Valley Healthcare System (here9 inafter referred to as the ‘‘Montrose VAMC’’) or otherwise 

10 take any action to lease, sell, exchange, trade, auction, 

11 transfer, or otherwise dispose of, or reduce the acreage 

12 of, Federal land and improvements at the Montrose 

13 VAMC, consisting of approximately 184 acres of land lo14 cated at 2094 Albany Post Road, Montrose, New York. 

15 (b) CASTLE POINT.—The Secretary of Veterans Af16 fairs may not declare as excess to the needs of the Castle 

17 Point Campus of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

18 Hudson Valley Healthcare System or otherwise take any 

19 action to lease, sell, exchange, trade, auction, transfer, or 

20 otherwise dispose of, or reduce the acreage of, Federal 

21 land and improvements at the Castle Point Campus lo22 cated at Route 9D, Castle Point, New York. 

23 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 8162(c)(1) 

24 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting 

25 ‘‘, section 2 (a) and (b) of the Hudson Valley VA Health 

26 Care System Campus Protection Act,’’ after ‘‘section 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2642 IH

1 421(b)(2) of the Veterans’ Benefits and Services Act of 

2 1988 (Public Law 100–322; 102 Stat. 553)’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         478,797
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  373,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,637
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       9,039,438
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,195,326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,727,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          416,594
<BONDS>                                      9,850,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,461,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,727,595
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,571,921
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,119,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (21,057,931)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             749,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             20,760,774
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         20,760,774
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                20,760,774
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   124.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   124.98
        

</TABLE>
exv10w32wk






Exhibit 10.32K




ENGINE ESCALATION,

ENGINE WARRANTY AND PATENT INDEMNITY

777-323ER




between



THE BOEING COMPANY



and



AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.



Supplemental Exhibit EE1-2

to Purchase Agreement Number PA-1980



 



					
	AAL-PA-1980-EE1-2
	 	 	 	SA-20
	 
	 	 	 	Page 1
	 
	 	BOEING PROPRIETARY	 	 






 









 





ENGINE ESCALATION

ENGINE WARRANTY AND PATENT INDEMNITY




relating to



BOEING MODEL 777-323ER AIRCRAFT


1. ENGINE ESCALATION.




     No separate engine escalation methodology is defined for the 777-323ER aircraft (Aircraft).
[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].


2. ENGINE WARRANTY AND PRODUCT SUPPORT PLAN.




     [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST
FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].



     [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST
FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].



 



					
	AAL-PA-1980-EE1-2
	 	 	 	SA-20
	 
	 	 	 	Page 2
	 
	 	BOEING PROPRIETARY
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

 
|   |   | Deloitte &  Touche S.p.A.  Piazza San Vito, 37  31100 Treviso  Italia  Tel: +39 0422 5875  Fax: +39 0422 579471  www.deloitte.it |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementsNo 333-14006 and 333-9546 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 29, 2005,relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule ofLuxottica Group S.p.A., appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for theyear ended December 31, 2004.

 

 
| /s/ Deloitte & Touche |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |
| Treviso, Italy            |
| June 27, 2005             |

 
|                                                                                                                       |   |                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
| Ancona Bari Bergamo Bologna Brescia Cagliari  Firenze Genova Milano Napoli Padova Parma Roma Torino Treviso Verona Vicenza |   | Member of  Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu |
|                                                                                                                       |   |                                |   |
| Sede Legale: Via Toronta, 25 - 20144 Milano                                                                                |   |                                |   |
| Capitale Sociale: sottoscritto e versato  Euro 10.327.590,00 - deliberato Euro 10.850.000,00                               |   |                                |   |
| Partita IVA/Codice Fiscale/Registro delle  Imprese Milano n. 03049560166 - R.E.A. Milano n. 1720239                        |   |                                |   |

 

----
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

November 18, 2005

Mr. Richard A. Sheehy

Sheehy, Serpe & Ware, P.C.

909 Fannin Street, Suite 2500

Houston, TX 77010-1003

Mr. Christopher A. Prine

Crain Caton & James, P.C.

1401 McKinney, Suite 1700

Houston, TX 77010-1079

RE:Case Number:  03-0661

Court of Appeals Number:  

Trial Court Number:  29,038

Style:IN RE  COLUMBIA/ST. DAVID'S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. D/B/A SOUTH AUSTIN HOSPITAL

Dear Counsel:

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), without hearing oral argument, the Court conditionally granted the petition for writ of mandamus and issued the enclosed per curiam opinion in the above-referenced cause.  The stay order issued December 19, 2003 is lifted.

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 03-0661Page 1**
<Page>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the 10-Q of Agility Capital, Inc. (the 'Company') an 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 'SS' 11150, as adopted
pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
            Report.

Date: August 15, 2002

                                          /s/ William O. Winsauer
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:  William O. Winsauer
                                          Title: Chairman of the Board and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


                                          /s/ A. Dale Henry
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:  A. Dale Henry
                                          Title: Chief Financial Officer and
                                                 Principal Accounting Officer

    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
'SS' 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
[Cite as In re A.M. , 2014-Ohio-5495.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

WARREN COUNTY

IN THE MATTER OF: :

A.M./M.M. : CASE NO. CA2014-07-097

: D E C I S I O N 12/15/2014 :

:

APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE DIVISION Case No. 12-D000723

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, Michael Greer, 500 Justice Drive, Lebanon, Ohio 45036, for appellee Alexander, Webb & Kinman, LLC, Tyler Webb, 423 Reading Road, Mason, Ohio 45040, for appellant

Per Curiam

. {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, R.B., has filed a brief wi th this court pursuantWarren CA2014-07-097

to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constituti onal rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the tr ial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to wit hdraw as counsel is grant ed, and this a ppeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

RINGLAND, P.J., HENDRICKSON and PIPER, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 15.1



Deloitte & Touche LLP
333 Clay Street,
Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002

August 12, 2003

Sterling Chemicals, Inc.
1200 Smith Street, Suite 1900
Houston, Texas 77002

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Sterling Chemicals, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") for the
three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, as indicated in our
report dated August 12, 2003; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed
no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, is
incorporated by reference in the Company's Registration Statement No. 333-105794
on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sonya Yvette McCOY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-20817

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 14, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Sonya Yvette McCoy appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm and moves to supplement the record with state court documents concerning her pri- or Texas convictions for delivery of a controlled substance. She argues that the district court plainly erred in determining that she had two prior Texas convictions that qualified as “controlled substance offenses” for purposes of a U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(2) base offense level enhancement.

According to the appellate record, McCoy was convicted in 2003 for possession with intent to deliver cocaine pursuant to Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a). This conviction qualifies as a “controlled substance offense” under § 2K2.1. *See United States v. Ford,*509 F.3d 714, 714-15 (5th Cir.2007). The record additionally discloses that in 2000 McCoy was charged by bill of information with delivery of a controlled substance, also a violation of § 481.112(a), with the judgment reflecting that she pleaded guilty to delivery by actual transfer. The judgment therefore confirms that her con*738viction was for activity that constituted a controlled substance offense under § 2K2.1(a)(2). *Cf. United States v. Gonzales,*484 F.3d 712, 714 (5th Cir.) (holding that inspection of indictment and jury instructions confirmed that the defendant’s § 481.112(a) conviction may have been for activity that did not constitute a “drug trafficking offense,” i.e., activity constituting an offer to sell), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 3031, 168 L.Ed.2d 748 (2007); *United States v. Morales-Martinez,*496 F.3d 356, 360-61 (5th Cir.) (holding that an undifferentiated guilty plea to an indictment charging the § 481.112(a) offense in the conjunctive did not necessitate a finding that the defendant committed a “drug trafficking offense” because it was unclear whether the defendant pleaded guilty to transfer of cocaine or the offer to sell cocaine), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 410, 169 L.Ed.2d 287 (2007). As such, McCoy has not demonstrated plain error on the part of the district court in calculating her base offense level pursuant to § 2K2.1(a)(2). *See United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.2005).

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD AND LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD EXCERPTS GRANTED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50720 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. GERARDO SAUCEDO-ESPINOZA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-973-ALL Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gerardo Saucedo-Espinoza raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 5, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50720

2 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Order entered August 1 8 , 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 01286

- CR

TROY NEAL HOOPER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Cour t Cause No. F 12

- 71997

- R



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.

On July 21, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s

brief ha d not been filed. On August 15, 2014, we received appellant’s brief, together with an

extensio n motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the July 21,

2014 order requiring findings.

We GRANT the August 15, 2014 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed

as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUST ICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND MARCH 31,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0 
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0 
<SALES>                                      2,794,734
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,835,568
<CGS>                                        1,636,710
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,724,940<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,509
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             586,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (361,477)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (365,477)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (365,477)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.09)
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUDES TRANSLATION GAIN OF $124,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>