alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2015 WY 2

 October Term, A.D. 2014

January 7, 2015

KURT YOUNG,

Appellant

(Defendant),

v.

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee

(Plaintiff).

S-14-0192

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S “JUDGMENT, SENTENCE 

AND ORDER OF INCARCERATION”

[¶1] This matter came before the Court upon the filing of Appellant’s pro se “Brief of 

Appellant.” Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant entered unconditional guilty pleas to 

one felony and two misdemeanors: delivery of methamphetamine, possession of 

marijuana, and possession of methamphetamine. This is Appellant’s direct appeal from 

the resulting convictions. On October 23, 2014, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate 

counsel filed a second “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Following a 

careful review of the record and the “Anders briefs” submitted by counsel, this Court, on 

November 18, 2014, entered its “Order Granting Motion for Court-Appointed Counsel to 

Withdraw.” That Order notified Appellant the District Court’s June 10, 2014,

“Judgment, Sentence and Order of Incarceration” would be affirmed unless, on or before 

January 5, 2015, Appellant filed a brief that persuaded this Court the captioned appeal is 

not wholly frivolous. Appellant filed his pro se “Brief of Appellant” on December 11, 

2014. After a careful review of that brief, this Court concludes that it presents no 

meritorious issue based on the record extant. Instead, the brief, for the most part, 

presents issues that were considered in the Anders briefs. It is, therefore, 
[¶2] ORDERED that the district court’s June 10, 2014, “Judgment, Sentence and 

Order of Incarceration” be, and the same hereby is, affirmed in all respects.

[¶3] DATED this 7th day of January, 2015.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

E. JAMES BURKE

Chief Justice
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 95 

To terminate the $1 presidential coin program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2015 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

APRIL 14, 2015 

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To terminate the $1 presidential coin program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF PRESIDENTIAL $1 COIN PRO4 GRAM. 

5 Section 5112 of title 31 United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking subsection (n) and inserting the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(n) [Reserved.]’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15296 and #15297; Hawaii Disaster Number HI-00041]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Hawaii dated 09/11/2017. *Incident:*
                         Marco Polo Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         07/14/2017.
 DATES: Issued on 09/11/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/13/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/11/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Honolulu *Contiguous Counties:*
                     None The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.500Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.750Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.610Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15296 5 and for economic injury is 15297 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Hawaii. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Linda E. McMahon, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2017-19999 Filed 9-19-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Order entered May 11, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01463-CV

CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH AND CREDIT SUISSE 

SECURITIES (USA) LLC, Appellants

V.

CLAYMORE HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-07858-G

ORDER

We GRANT court reporter Vielica Dobbins’s May 10, 2016 request for extension of 

time to file the reporter’s record and ORDER the record be filed no later than June 10, 2016.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
#### The Harry.*

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

January 15, 1883.)

Collision—Canal-Boat at End of Piek—Peofeller.

Where a canal-boat, sound and strong, was lying at the end oí a pier, and a propeller, in attempting to get into the adjoining slip, brought up against the canal-boat and injured her, *held,*that if it was necessary for the propeller to come up along-side and against the canal-boat, it was her duty to do so in an easy manner, and the propeller must be held liable for the damage resulting from the blow.

Ju Admiralty.

*W. W. Goodrich,*for libelant.

*Beebe, Wilcox & Hobbs,*for claimant.

*

 Reported by R. D. & Wyllys Benedict

Benedict, J.

This action is to recover for injuries to the canal-boat T. S. Gray, while lying at the end of pier 46 in the North river, occasioned by a collision between the canal-boat and the propeller Harry. At the time of the collision the propeller Harry, having a barge laden with grain in tow along-side, was endeavoring to get into the slip between pier 46 and pier 45. The libelant’s boat lay moored at the end of the pier, her bow down stream and projecting beyond the side of the pier. The tide was flood. The method adopted by the propeller was to come head to the tide off the end of pier 46, and then move into the slip. In accomplishing this maneuver she brought up against the canal-boat, that was lying at the end of pier 46, causing the damage sued for.

The proofs show that the canal-boat was a sound boat, able to withstand all ordinary contact with other vessels at the piers, and that she was moored in a proper manner at a place whore she had the right to be. The proofs also show that the blow which she received from the Harry was a severe one. If, as contended in behalf of the propeller, it was necessary for the propeller, under the circumstances, to come up along-side and against the canal-boat, it was, nevertheless, the duty of the propeller to do so in an easy manner, without dangerous force. This duty was not discharged. The effect of the blow shows that the blow was severe. I have no doubt that the injury to the libelant’s boat resulted from a want of due care on the part of the Harry.

The case differs from the case of *The Charles R. Stone,*9 Ben. 182, relied on by the claimant. In that case the tug simply sagged in by *162the tide so easily that no danger resulted from the contact. Here, a blow was given with force sufficient to break in the side of a strong boat.

There must be a decree for libelant, with an order of reference to ascertain the amount of the damage done.
#### Theodore Petties, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

Submitted February 11, 2008;

decided March 20, 2008

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2013-C14 Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"): (a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and (b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  February 25, 2016  /s/ Brian SmithBRIAN SMITHVice President  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

1.     The
undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Western Gas Resources, Inc. ("Western Gas Resources"). This Certification is
made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Western Gas Resources for the year ended
December 31, 2005.

2.     We
certify that such Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Western Gas Resources.

This
Certification is executed as of March 13, 2006.

| |  | /s/PETER A. DEAPeter A. Dea, Chief Executive Officer and President                           
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/WILLIAM J. KRYSIAKWilliam J. Krysiak, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
#### United States *v.*Thorne.

*Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

February 9, 1883.)

Criminal Procedure.

TVhere the accused was ready for trial and attended court during the term fixed for his trial, and pressed the district attorney to try his case, but the district attorney omitted to call up the case, without sufficient reason existing for such omission, a motion to discharge accused on his own recognizance was refused, he being on bail at the time.

*II. E. Tremaine,*for the motion.

*W. P. Fiero,*Asst. Dist. Atty., opposed.

Benedict, J.

This is a motion by the accused to be discharged on his own recognizance, or that his trial do immediately proceed. The ground of the application is that the accused was ready to be tried at the February term, and attended court during the term, and pressed the district attorney to try his case, but the district attorney omitted to call up the case, although the trial might have been had, and no sufficient reason existed for omitting to call up the case. The affidavits show that the accused was in court, pressing for a trial of his case at the February term, and I am by no means satisfied with the reasons assigned by the district attorney for his omission to call up the case. So far as the business of the court is concerned there was abundant opportunity to try the case at the February term, and I think it ought to have been called up. I do not, however, think it advisable to discharge the accused upon his own recognizance at this term. He is on bail, and the bail given will stand until the next term in March. If, at the opening of that term, an early day be not fixed by the district attorney for the disposition of the case, the present motion may be renewed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2017

ELAINE MURRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE; THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS; CUMBERLAND COUNTY BUSINESS COUNCIL; THE LUNDY GROUP; 300 BLOCK INVESTORS LLC; PENNINK & STROTHER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cv-00861-BR) Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 29, 2006 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elaine Murry, Appellant Pro Se. James R. Nance, Jr., REID, LEWIS, DEESE, NANCE & PERSON, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Karen M. McDonald, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Douglas Edward Canders, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fayetteville, North Carolina; John Roseboro, THE BANKS LAW FIRM, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; Steven B. Epstein, Raymond Albert Starling, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Raleigh, North Carolina; Garris- 2 - Neil Yarborough, THE YARBOROUGH LAW FIRM, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Steven James O’Connor, MCCOY, WEAVER, WIGGINS, CLEVELAND & RAPER, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Elaine Murry appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1982 and 2000d (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeMurry v. City of Fayetteville , No. 5:05- CV-861-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
(logo) LNR 

Partners, LLC

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,  being the President of  LNR Partners,   LLC (the "Special Servicer"),  as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement  for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto,  hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule  I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows : 

 

1.                 A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during  the period commencing on January 1, 2014 and ending on December 31 , 2014 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the "Reporting  Period"),  and of the Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and 

 

2.                 To the best of my knowledge, based on  such review and using  the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of  its  obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC, 

a Florida limited liability company 

 

 

B y :       /s/ Job Warshaw

            Job Warshaw

            President 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dated :    February 23, 2015 

 

 

 

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue ● Suite 700 ● Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 ● Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

 

Schedule I

 

GSMS 2013-GCJ14 

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013- GCJ14

 

 

Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited 

101N . Wacker , Suite 100 

Attn : Commercial  Mortgage Surveillance 

Chicago IL 60606 

General Contact 

 

 

 

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II 

101N. Wacker ,  Suite 100 

Attn : Commercial Mortgage Surveillance 

Chicago IL 60606 

Joe   Osborne 

 

 

 

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II 

200 West Street 

New York NY 10282 

Leah   Nivison 

 

 

 

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II 

101N . Wacker , Suite 100 

Attn : Commercial Mortgage Surveillance 

Chicago IL 60606 

Peter   Morreale 

 

 

 

Kroll Bond Rating Agency , Inc. , 

845 Third Avenue, 4th Floor 

Attention : CMBS Surveillance New 

York NY 1 0022 

Genera l Contact 

 

 

 

Moody's Investors Service , In c .

7 World Trade Center

250 Greenwich Street

Attn: Commercial Mortgage Surveillance Group 

New York NY 10007

General Contact 

 

 

 

Pentalpha Surveillance LLC 

375 N. French Road , Suite 100 

Amherst NY 14228 

Don  Simon 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank , N.A 

Sixth Street and Marquette Avenue 

Att: CMBS-GS 2013-GC10 

Minneapolis MN 55479-0113 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 

9062 Old Annapolis Road 

ATTN : {pool name} 

Columbia MD 21045 1951 

Corporate Trust ( CMBS )
FORM OF CERTIFICATION               EXHIBIT 31.1b

                       PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 AND 15d-14
              UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Gary Coy, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Amarillo
Biosciences, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this annual
report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

      4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

            (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

            (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

            (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

      5. As the registrant's certifying officer I have disclosed, based on the
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

            (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.

      6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: August 9, 2006             /s/ Gary Coy
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              Name:  Gary Coy
                              Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at June 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Operations
for the Six Months Ended June 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,613
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,754
<PP&E>                                       2,150,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                 578,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,696,125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              117
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,696,008
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,696,125
<SALES>                                        152,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               172,781
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               110,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 62,014
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             62,014
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    62,014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     9.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.16
        

</TABLE>