alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 182 (Thursday, September 21, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20130]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
Research, Engineering & Development Advisory Committee meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on October 11, 2017--9:00 a.m. to 4:30 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Bessie Coleman Conference 
Center (FOB 10A, Second Floor), Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chinita A. Roundtree-Coleman at (609) 
485-7149 or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#482b202126213c29663a273d262c3c3a2d2d652b27242d252926082e2929662f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c0f04050205180d421e03190208181e0909410f030009010d022c0a0d0d420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Research, Engineering and Development 
(RE&D) Advisory Committee. The meeting agenda will include time 
allocated to discuss recommendations provided by the advisory committee 
to the FAA on research and development investments in the areas of air 
traffic services, airports, aircraft safety, human factors and 
environment and energy. Attendance is open to the interested public but 
seating is limited. With the approval of the chairman, members of the 
public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to 
attend the meeting, present statements, or obtain information should 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
Committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 13, 2017.
Chinita A. Roundtree-Coleman,
Computer Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2017-20130 Filed 9-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 21

- 0143

Jill Marie Lotter,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

State of Montana,

Respondent and Appellee.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is

given an extension of time until October 8 , 2021 to prepare, file and serve the

Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 9 2021

09/09/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0143
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 2292

THOMAS RAYMOND FIRRIOLO
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
BRAD RICE, City Code Official, Greenville, South Carolina; ROBERT PATRICK COLOR; KENNETH MILLER, Chief of Police, Greenville Law Enforcement Department, State of South Carolina; MICHAEL PITTS, City Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina; OFFICER JOHNATHAN BRAGG, Public Information Official, Greenville Law Enforcement Department; OFFICER ANDREW HANSEN, Greenville Law Enforcement Department, State of S.C.; CHRISTOPHER PUSTIZ, Police Officer, Greenville Law Enforcement; JOHN CASTIL, South Carolina Government Official, also known as John Castile; TRANE, Corporate Service Company; MATHEW PRITCHARD, Territory Manager; DAVID CROTTS, Field Representative
,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. ( 6:18

- cv

- 00096

- DCC )

Submitted : August 7, 2020 Decided: September 1, 2020

Before KING and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges
, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Thomas Raymond Firriolo , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Thomas Raymond Firriolo appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and dismissing Firriolo’s civil action without prejudice for lack

of subject matter jurisdiction. ∗ On appeal , we confine our review to the issues raised in the

informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Firriolo’s informal brief does not challenge
the basis for the district court’s disposition of his claims, he has forfeited appellate review

of the court’s orders. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The
informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited
to issues preserved in that brief.”) Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment
and deny all of Firriolo’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ Although the district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice, we have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC , 959 F.3d 605, 615 (4th Cir. 2020).
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2558 

To modify the definition of children’s hospital for purposes of making payments to children’s hospitals that operate graduate medical education 

programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2011 

Mr. CICILLINE (for himself, Mr. LANGEVIN, and Mr. ENGEL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To modify the definition of children’s hospital for purposes 

of making payments to children’s hospitals that operate 

graduate medical education programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children’s Hospitals 

5 Education Equity Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2558 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROGRAM OF PAYMENTS TO CHILDREN’S HOS2 PITALS THAT OPERATE GRADUATE MEDICAL 

3 EDUCATION PROGRAMS. 

4 Section 340E(g)(2) of the Public Health Service Act 

5 (42 U.S.C. 256e(g)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘means a’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘means— 

8 ‘‘(A) a’’; 

9 (2) by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; or’’; 

10 and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(B) a psychiatric hospital, as defined in 

13 section 1861(f) of the Social Security Act, that 

14 has continuously since the date of enactment of 

15 this subparagraph met all of the following cri16 teria: 

17 ‘‘(i) The hospital is excluded from the 

18 Medicare inpatient hospital prospective 

19 payment system pursuant to section 

20 1886(d)(1)(B)(i) of such Act (and regula21 tions promulgated under such section). 

22 ‘‘(ii) The hospital has 90 percent or 

23 more inpatients under the age of 18. 

24 ‘‘(iii) The hospital has a Medicare 

25 payment agreement. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2558 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) The hospital has an approved 

2 medical residency training program as de3 fined in section 1886(h)(5)(A) of such 

4 Act.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
1 NO. 01

- 18

- 00136

- CV

TONYA BAUER, Individually and as
Guardian of the Person and Estate of EMILY BAUER, an Incapacitated Person, and WILLIAM BRYANT,

Appellants

,

v.

GULSHAN ENTERPRISES, INC., BIN ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Appellee

. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § IN THE FIRST

COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

APPELLANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS:

Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5 (b) and 38.6(d)

, Appellants Tonya

Bauer, individually and as guardian of the person and estate of Emily Bauer,

an incapacitated person, and William Bryant (“Appellants”) file this

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File B rief :

Appellants’ brief is due on June 4, 2018

. Due to the conflicting briefing

deadlines and oral argument settings of Appellants’ appellate counsel, 1

1 No.	18

- 0258, Ford,	et	al	.	v.	Diamond	Pharmacy,	et	al. (Supreme	Court	of	Texas)	(briefing);

No.	04

- 16

- 00298

- CV, El	Caballero	Ranch	&	Laredo	Marine	LLC	v.	Grace	River	Ranch (Fourth Court	of	Appeals) (oral	argument) ;	No. 18

- 0181, Guerra	&	Moore,	et	al.	v.	Cantu (Supreme ACCEPTED
01-18-00136-CV
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS
5/25/2018 12:51 PM
CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK2 Appellants request an additional thirty ( 30 ) days to file their brief, which, if

granted, would make the brief due on July 5 , 2018

. Appellants conferred

with counsel for Appellee Gulshan Enterprises, Inc

. , and opposing counsel

indicated no opposition to this request . This is Appellants’ first extension

motion.

Respectfully submitted,

P HIPPS A NDERSON D EACON LLP By: /s/ Barry Deacon
Martin J. Phipps Texas Bar No. 00791444 Joseph B. Deacon Texas Bar No. 24096725
Vanessa Y. Cantu Texas Bar No. 24096630 102 9th Street San Antonio, Texas 78215 Telephone: (210) 340

- 9877 Facsimile: (210) 340

- 9899 mphipps@phippsandersondeacon.com bdeacon@phippsandersondeacon.com vcantu@phippsandersondeacon.com

Kimberly S. Keller Texas Bar No. 24014182

K ELLER S TOLARCZYK
, PLLC 234 W. Bandera Rd., No. 120 Boerne, Texas 78006 Telephone: 830.981.5000 Facsimile: 888.293.8580 kim@kellsto.com

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS

Court	of	Texas)	(briefing);	No.	17

- 0736, Teal	Trading	&	Dev.,	LP	v.	Champee	Springs	Ranches (Suprem e	Court	of	Texas)	(briefing).3 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE & SERVICE

I certify that Appellants’ appellate counsel, Kimberly S. Keller conferred with counsel for Appellee Gulshan Enterprises, Inc. by email correspondence, and opposing counsel has agreed to and is unopposed to this request

. On May 2 5 , 2018, a copy of this Motion was served on those
listed below via this Court’s e

- notice system.

Nathan M. Rymer Via Electronic Service Laura W. Slay 2801 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 250 Houston, Texas 77056 nrymer@rmjelaw.com lslay@rmjelaw.com shellyhart@rmjelaw.com Attorney for Appellee, Gulshan Enterprises, Inc.

BIN Enterprises, Pro Se Via Electronic Service Attn: Salman Hameed, President 12251 Jones Road Houston, Texas 77070

- 5210 salmanukha n786@yahoo.com

/s/ Barry Deacon Barry Deacon
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2556 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2556

To suspend the issuance of visas to nationals of Brazil until such time 
 as Brazil amends its laws to remove the prohibition on extradition of 
                nationals of Brazil to other countries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 2011

 Mr. Ryan of Ohio (for himself and Mr. Johnson of Ohio) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend the issuance of visas to nationals of Brazil until such time 
 as Brazil amends its laws to remove the prohibition on extradition of 
                nationals of Brazil to other countries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF VISAS FOR BRAZILIANS UNTIL BRAZIL AMENDS ITS 
              LAWS TO REMOVE THE PROHIBITION ON EXTRADITION OF 
              NATIONALS OF BRAZIL TO OTHER COUNTRIES.

    (a) Suspension of Visa Issuance.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, no immigrant or nonimmigrant visa may be issued to a 
citizen, subject, national, or resident of Brazil until the President 
of the United States determines and certifies to the Congress that the 
Government of Brazil has amended its laws to remove the prohibition on 
extradition of nationals of Brazil to other countries.
    (b) Waiver.--The President may waive the application of subsection 
(a) on a case-by-case basis if the President determines and certifies 
to the Congress that it is in the national interests of the United 
States to do so.
    (c) Effect of Unauthorized Issuance.--Any visa issued in violation 
of this subsection shall be null and void.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 10, 2021

NO. 03-20-00585-CV

Judy A. Guyaux, Appellant

v.

Aaron J. Mitchell; Jennifer K. Mitchell; Michael Mitchell; and Mary Angeline Mitchell, 

Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on May 15, 2020. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The appellant 

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
**
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode), the undersigned officer of Navigator Holdings Ltd., a Marshall Islands company (the “Company”), hereby certifies that: 

The Annual Reporton Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated May 22, 2020 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: May 22, 2020 

 
By: /s/ Harry DeansName: Dr. Harry DeansTitle: 
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal ExecutiveOfficer)
**
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2581 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2581

 To provide that the public debt limit shall not affect timely payment 
                  in full of Social Security benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2011

Mr. Posey (for himself, Mr. Webster, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Austin 
    Scott of Georgia, Mr. Latta, Mr. Griffith of Virginia, and Mr. 
 Farenthold) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that the public debt limit shall not affect timely payment 
                  in full of Social Security benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Check Guarantee Act 
of 2011''.

SEC. 2. TIMELY PAYMENT IN FULL OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS 
              NOTWITHSTANDING THE PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT.

    (a) In General.--Nothing in section 3101 of title 31, United States 
Code, shall be construed to have the effect of--
            (1) precluding or otherwise limiting timely redemption of 
        obligations owed to the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance 
        Trust Fund or the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund to 
        the extent necessary to provide for timely payment in full of 
        benefits payable from such Trust Funds, or
            (2) otherwise precluding or limiting timely payment in full 
        of benefits payable from such Trust Funds.
    (b) Operation of the Public Debt Limit in Other Respects.--In 
applying the limitation on public debt under section 3101 of title 31, 
United States Code, subsection (a) shall be taken into account before 
applying such limitation to any other matter affected by such section.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 24, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 24, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0345. ROBERT JAY DAVIS v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

10CR052
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**







I,
      Donald
      S. Robbins, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CSMG Technologies, Inc. for the quarter
      ended
      September 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”), that the Form 10-Q fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      CSMG
      Technologies, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.


Dated: November
              13, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Donald
              S.
              RobbinsDonald
              S. Robbins, Chief Executive
              Officer






I,
      K.
      Bruce Jones, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CSMG Technologies, Inc. for the quarter
      ended
      September 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”), that the Form 10-Q fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      CSMG
      Technologies, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.


Date: November
              13, 2007
            By:
            /s/ K.
              Bruce
              JonesK.
              Bruce Jones, Chief Financial
              Officer










The
      above
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

ALLEN FEINGOLD, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

ELIZABETH BRODY AND MARJORIE S. 

YELON, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 39 EAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[ 886 NE2d 155, 856 NYS2d 533]

#### Eugenia Swiderska, Appellant, v New York University et al., Respondents.

Decided March 20, 2008

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Profeta & Eisenstein,*New York City *(Fred R. Profeta, Jr.,*of counsel), for appellant.

*Wade Clark Mulcahy,*New York City *(Dennis M. Wade*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment as to liability on her Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action should be granted and defendants’ cross motions for summary judgment should be denied.

As part of a commercial cleaning contract, plaintiffs employer instructed her to clean the 10-foot-high interior windows in a dormitory building, providing her with only a rag and window *793washing solution to complete the task. When plaintiff asked for a ladder so that she could reach the tops of the windows, she was instructed to climb on furniture instead. While standing on a bed in an attempt to clean a window, plaintiff fell to the floor, suffering multiple fractures and other injuries. This Labor Law § 240 (1) action ensued.

The parties cross-moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability, with both lower courts granting judgment in favor of defendants on the theory that the activity in which plaintiff was engaged constituted routine maintenance not covered by Labor Law § 240 (1). We disagree and conclude that plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment on the issue of liability. In *Broggy v Rockefeller Group, Inc.*(8 NY3d 675 [2007]), we held that commercial window cleaning comparable to the activity at issue here is encompassed within Labor Law § 240 (1) if it created the type of elevation-related risk that the statute was intended to address. In this case, plaintiff established that she was injured while cleaning 10-foot-high windows in a college dormitory with a rag, which required her to climb upon pieces of furniture in order to complete her work—creating an elevation-related risk— and she was not provided a ladder, scaffold or other safety device of the kind contemplated under the statute.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2013, by and among RBS COMMERCIAL FUNDING INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer and Co-op Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC., as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series WFRBS 2013-C15 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1 .        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2 .        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

 

 

 

 

                   /s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice P r esident

Wells Fa rgo Bank 

 

 

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|