alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 09, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 09, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0057. MCG HEALTH, INC., d/b/a GEORGIA REGENTS MEDICAL CENTER et al. v. KIM CHEELY.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2015RCSC00241
exhibit10_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1







IMPERIUM ADVISERS, LLC


515 Madison Avenue


New York, NY 10022












December 29, 2011







Integrated BioPharma, Inc.


225 Long Avenue


Hillside, NJ 07205







Re:  Extension of Forbearance Agreement







Ladies and Gentlemen:







Reference is made to the Forbearance Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2011 (as amended, the “Forbearance Agreement”), by and between Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the “Company”) and Imperium Advisers, LLC, in its capacity as collateral agent (in such “Collateral Agent”) for itself and the Investors referred to therein.  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this letter shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Forbearance Agreement.







In consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby acknowledged, confirmed and agreed that all references in the Forbearance Agreement to “December 31, 2011” are hereby amended to mean “January 6, 2012”.







Except as expressly modified pursuant hereto, no other changes or modifications to the Forbearance Agreement are intended or implied, and in all other respects, the Forbearance Agreement is hereby specifically ratified, restated and confirmed by the parties hereto as of the date hereof.







The effectiveness of this letter agreement shall be subject to the receipt by Collateral Agent of an original (or electronic copy) of this letter agreement duly executed and delivered by the Company.













	  	
Very truly yours,


	  	  
	  	
IMPERIUM ADVISERS, LLC,


	  	
as Collateral Agent on behalf of Investors


	  	  
	  	
By:  /s/ William C. Steward


	  	
Name:  William C. Steward


	  	
Title:  CFO













	
ACKNOWLEDGED, ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

	  
	  	  
	
INTEGRATED BIOPHARMA, INC.

	  
	  	  
	
By:  /s/ Dina L. Masi

	  
	
Name:  Dina L. Masi

	  
	
Title:  CFO
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133087 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133087 

 COA: 262370 

Kent CC: 04-007814-FC 

JAMES SCOTT BASKIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 23.2



Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

LICENSED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

TORONTO  MONTREAL







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The undersigned, Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp, hereby consents to the use of our name and the use of our opinion dated March 2, 2009 on the consolidated financial statements of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the
Company) included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A being filed by the Company, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

We also
consent to the use of our name and the use of our opinion dated March 2, 2009 on Internal Control over Financial Reporting for HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A being filed by the Company, for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

LOGO



|                         |  |                            
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------
|Toronto, Ontario, Canada |  | Chartered Accountants      
|June 9, 2009             |  | Licensed Public Accountants





| |  |                                                                                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| |  | 1167 Caledonia Road Toronto, Ontario M6A
2X1 Tel: 416 785 5353 Fax: 416 785 5663 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 Wednesday, September 20, 2017, 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

# PLACE:

 Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD.

# STATUS:

 Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

# Matter To Be Considered:

 Decisional Matter: Petition HP 15-1 Requesting Rulemaking on Certain Products Containing Organohalogen Flame Retardants.

                        A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at                         *https://www.cpsc.gov/​live.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Rockelle Hammond, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: September 13, 2017.

Alberta E. Mills,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-19756 Filed 9-13-17; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
Exhibit 31.2 I, Ellida McMillan, certify that: 1.

          I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alcentra Capital Corporation; 2.

          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.

          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.

          The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a)

          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)

          Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and (c)

          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation. 5.

          The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)

          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b)

          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 9, 2017 /s/ Ellida McMillanEllida McMillan Chief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>                                      
     THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE WAS ORIGINALLY FILED WITH THE JUNE 30, 1997 FORM 
10-Q AND HAS BEEN REVISED TO REFLECT THE IMPACT OF SFAS 128.
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
JUNE 30, 1997 YEAR-TO-DATE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS REPORTED ON FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY  BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>                                     
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1,000
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                          995
<SECURITIES>                                                  8,953
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 6,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             17,479
<PP&E>                                                        3,596
<DEPRECIATION>                                                1,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               21,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         4,876
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                          7
<OTHER-SE>                                                   16,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 21,198
<SALES>                                                       6,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              9,692
<CGS>                                                           298
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 1,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 230
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     86
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             144
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    144
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0.02
        
 

</TABLE>
[937 NYS2d 526]

#### Bertram R. Budhu, Appellant, v Gregorio Castro, Respondent, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 6, 2011

*37APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Jack L. Glasser, P.C.,*Jamaica *(Jack L. Glasser*of counsel), for appellant. *Rogers Wughalter Kaufman Corredine & Zinno,*Bronx *(Eric Wughalter*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order, dated April 20, 2010, reversed, with $10 costs, tenant’s dismissal motion denied and matter remanded for a new trial.

The trial court erred in granting tenant’s motion to dismiss this nonprimary residence holdover proceeding at the close of landlord’s evidence. Upon such a motion, tenant had the burden of showing that landlord failed to make out a prima facie case, and landlord was entitled to the benefit of every favorable inference that could reasonably be drawn from the evidence *(see Peck v Wolf,*157 AD2d 535, 536 [1990], *lv denied*75 NY2d 709 [1990]). There is proof in the record of tenant’s admissions that he lives with his wife in a specified residential building located nearby, that correspondence sent by landlord to tenant at the subject building premises was returned as undeliverable, and that landlord has seldom seen tenant in or around the building for at least three years, despite landlord’s repeated attempts to gain access to tenant’s rent-controlled apartment. Such evidence was legally sufficient to survive tenant’s dismissal motion, and this despite the absence from landlord’s tried submission of evidence tending to support each of the allegations contained in its underlying termination notice. Absolute synchronicity between the trial evidence and the allegations set out in a predicate notice is not required *(see Rocky 116 v Weston,*195 Misc 2d 363, 365 [2003]). While the trial court voiced a concern over the good faith basis of some of the “sweeping claims” advanced in landlord’s termination notice, the appropriate remedy, if any, for any material falsehoods that may be contained in the notice would be the imposition of rule 130 (22 NYCRR 130-1.1) sanctions, not outright dismissal of the proceeding.

Schoenfeld, J.R, Shulman and Hunter, Jr., JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19297]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-135-2017]


Foreign-Trade Zone 44--Morris County, New Jersey; Application for 
Subzone; Ekornes Inc.; Somerset, New Jersey

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) by the New Jersey Department of State, grantee of FTZ 44, 
requesting subzone status for the facility of Ekornes Inc. (Ekornes), 
located in Somerset, New Jersey. The application was submitted pursuant 
to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 
81a-81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was 
formally docketed on September 7, 2017.
    The proposed subzone (2.25 acres) is located at 615 Pierce Street, 
Somerset, New Jersey. No authorization for production activity has been 
requested at this time. The proposed subzone would be subject to the 
existing activation limit of FTZ 44.
    In accordance with the Board's regulations, Kathleen Boyce of the 
FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make 
recommendations to the Executive Secretary.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at the address 
below. The closing period for their receipt is October 23, 2017. 
Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the 
foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period 
to November 6, 2017.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 
Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the ``Reading Room'' section of the 
Board's Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Kathleen Boyce at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a113b2e32363f3f3474183523393f1a2e283b3e3f743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="753e14011d1910101b5b371a0c16103501071411105b121a03">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-1346.

    Dated: September 7, 2017.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19297 Filed 9-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Interchange Judgment Sharing Agreement Schedule


 Exhibit 10.2 
 Schedule With Respect to Interchange Judgment Sharing Agreement 
 The Interchange Judgment
Sharing Agreement (the “Original JSA”), dated as of July 1, 2007, among Visa U.S.A. Inc., Visa International Service Association and various financial institutions was substantially identical in all material respects to the Form of
the Judgment Sharing Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s July 2007 registration statement on Form S-4. The Original LSA was amended and restated in the Amended and Restated Interchange Judgment Sharing
Agreement dated as of December 16, 2008 (as amended and restated, the “Interchange Judgment Sharing Agreement”), to give effect to the Company’s ability to deposit Loss Funds into the Escrow Account as provided for in the
Company’s Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and as described in the Company’s Proxy Statement, dated November 14, 2008. On February 7, 2011, Visa Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Consent to
Amendment of Interchange Judgment Sharing Agreement (the “JSA Amendment “), to amend the Interchange Judgment Sharing Agreement to include each of the parties to the JSA Amendment as a Signatory to the Interchange Judgment Sharing
Agreement. After giving effect to the JSA Amendment, the parties to the Interchange Judgment Sharing Agreement are: 
 Bank of America,
N.A., MBNA America (Delaware), FIA Card Services N.A. (f/k/a Bank of America, N.A. (USA) and 
 MBNA America Bank, N.A.), Bank of America
Corporation, and NB Holdings Corporation 
 BA Merchant Services LLC (F/k/a National Processing, Inc.), 

Barclays Bank plc, Barclays Financial Corp., and Barclays Bank Delaware 
 Capital One Bank, (USA), N.A., Capital One, F.S.B, Capital One, N.A., Capital One Financial Corporation 

Chase Bank USA, N.A. 
 Citibank
(South Dakota), N.A., Citibank, N.A., Citicorp, and Citigroup, Inc. 
 Fifth Third Bancorp 

First National of Nebraska, Inc. and 

First National Bank of Omaha 
 HSBC
Finance Corporation 
 HSBC Bank USA, N.A. 
 HSBC North America Holdings Inc. 
 HSBC Bank plc 

HSBC Holdings plc 
 JPMorgan
Chase & Co. 
 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as acquirer of certain assets and liabilities of Washington Mutual Bank from the Federal

 Deposit Insurance Corporation acting as receiver 
 PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to National City Bank and National City Bank of Kentucky 
 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc, successor by merger to National City Corporation 
 Suntrust
Banks, Inc. 
 Texas Independent Bancshares, Inc. 
 U.S. Bank, N.A., and U.S. Bancorp 
 Wells Fargo & Co. 

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. 
 Wells
Fargo & Co., as successor to Wachovia Corporation 
 Wells Fargo Bank N.A., as successor to Wachovia Bank, N.A. 

Visa U.S.A. Inc. 
 Visa International
Service Association 
 Visa Inc.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

483 

KA 10-01267 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

WILLIAM TUTTLE, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

WILLIAMS, HEINL, MOODY & BUSCHMAN, P.C., AUBURN (RYAN JAMES MULDOON OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

JOSEPH V. CARDONE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ALBION (KATHERINE BOGAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Orleans County Court (James P.

Punch, J.), rendered March 15, 2010. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a

controlled substance in the fifth degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed.

Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 948 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the taxable 

income limit on percentage depletion for oil and natural gas produced 

from marginal properties. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 15, 2015 

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate 

the taxable income limit on percentage depletion for oil 

and natural gas produced from marginal properties. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF TAXABLE INCOME LIMIT ON 

4 PERCENTAGE DEPLETION FOR OIL AND NAT5 URAL GAS PRODUCED FROM MARGINAL 

6 PROPERTIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (H) of section 

8 613A(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

9 amended to read as follows: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 948 IS

1 ‘‘(H) NONAPPLICATION OF TAXABLE IN2 COME LIMIT WITH RESPECT TO MARGINAL PRO3 DUCTION.—The second sentence of subsection 

4 (a) of section 613 shall not apply to so much 

5 of the allowance for depletion as is determined 

6 under subparagraph (A).’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

9 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS