alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2











Exhibit 10.2




Crown Castle International Corp.

Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation




Initial Equity Grant. Each newly appointed or elected non-employee director is
granted, pursuant to the Crown Castle International Corp. (“Company”) 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended, a number of unrestricted shares of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) having a
valuation equal to approximately $90,000, valued at the per share closing price of the Common Stock
as of the effective date of the director’s appointment or election.



Annual Equity Grant. At the Board’s first regularly scheduled meeting of each year,
each non-employee director is granted shares of Common Stock having a valuation equal to
approximately $125,000 ($200,000 in the case of the Chairman of the Board), valued at the per share
closing price of the Common Stock as of the date of such Board meeting. On February 10, 2011, the
Board granted (1) 2,756 shares of common stock (priced at $45.36, the closing price of the Common
Stock on February 10, 2011) to each non-employee director of the Board other than J. Landis Martin
and (2) 4,409 shares of common stock (priced at $45.36, the closing price of the Common Stock on
February 10, 2011) to J. Landis Martin for service as non-employee Chairman of the Board.



Retainers. Each non-employee director receives an annual retainer, paid in quarterly
installments, of $75,000 (plus (1) an additional $20,000, $10,000, $8,000 and $5,000 for the Chair
of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee and
Strategy Committee, respectively, and (2) an additional $5,000 for each member of the Audit
Committee other than the Chair), and reimbursement of reasonable incidental expenses.



Other Benefits. Each non-employee director is eligible to participate, at such
director’s cost and election, in the Company’s medical and dental plans.



Employee Directors. A director who is also an employee of the Company receives no
additional compensation for services as a director.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          17,527
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,472
<PP&E>                                         203,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,192)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,619
<BONDS>                                        286,509
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   307,856
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,394
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,580)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,580)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,008)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40670

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GUILLERMO ARENAS-CASANOVA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:10-CR-1307-1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Guillermo ArenasCasanova has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arenas-Casanova has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40670 Document: 00512598527 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
No. 13-40670

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40670 Document: 00512598527 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
#### HERMAN SCHWABE, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION, Defendant.

Civ. No. 17660.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

July 25, 1960.

Sigmund Moses, New York City, Robert Malloy, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland & Kiendl, New York City, Louis L. Stanton, Jr., New York City, of counsel, for defendant.

BRUCHHAUSEN, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff moves for enlargement of time until November 1, 1960, to comply with the provision of calendar rule 1(b) ; to complete discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.; and an order directing the defendant to produce for plaintiff’s inspection documents numbered 1 to 10 in the notice of motion.

The production of all of the said documents other than those referred to as items 7 and 8 has previously been denied by Judge Zavatt in Schwabe, Inc., v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., D.C., 23 F.R.D. 251, and by Judge Bryan in *229Buscher v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., D.C., 23 F.R.D. 183. Items 1 to 6, inclusive, 9 and 10 were submitted to Judge Zavatt who upheld the defendant’s contention of attorney-client privilege. The plaintiff in this renewal motion has failed to allege any valid reasons why Judge Zavatt’s ruling should not prevail. The production of the classified profit and loss statements of the defendant is desired by the plaintiff to prepare evidence on the issue of damage. Judge Bryan in Buscher v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., supra, rejected this contention. Inspection under Rule 34 is not available unless the party show good cause. In the case at bar as in the Buscher case, supra, the plaintiff demands this statement as an aid in the determination of the said issue. This reason is not sufficient to require its production under Rule 34.

The two documents not previously considered are memoranda of Theodore Kiendl and Mr. Ward, both attorneys who interviewed Herman Schwabs a prospective witness for the defendant. They relate to transactions between attorney and client and hence are privileged. Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 67 S.Ct. 385, 91 L.Ed. 451.

The plaintiff desires enlargement of time in order to complete depositions of witnesses and prepare experts on the question of damage. An inspection of the file reveals that issue herein was joined over three years ago. Subsequent to that date judges of this court ordered the filing of a Note of Issue by the plaintiff. Extensions of time were granted permitting the plaintiff to complete his pre-trial procedures and appeal. Such procedures must be completed and a statement of readiness filed on or before September 1, 1960, in compliance with the provision of calendar rule 1(b).

Settle order on notice.
CELL TECH INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cell Tech International
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Form 10-Q"), I, Marta C. Carpenter, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                     /s/ Marta C. Carpenter
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     Marta C. Carpenter
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

                                                     DATED: November 19, 2003

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required  by  Section  906,  has  been  provided  to  Cell  Tech   International
Incorporated  and will be retained by Cell Tech  International  Incorporated and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       25
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CALIPER LIFE SCIENCES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Peter F. McAree, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany certify, pursuant to the requirement set forth inRule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledgethat:

 

(1)                 The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;and

 

(2)                 The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company.

 
|                         | /s/ PETER F. MCAREE                                |   |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |                                               |
|                         | Peter F. McAree                                    |
|                         | Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|                         | (Principal Financial  Officer)                     |
|                         |                                               |
|                         |                                               |
| Date:  November 5, 2010 |

 

----
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2013-CCRE9 Mortgage Trust (the "ExchangeAct periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as awhole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements requiredin this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers havefulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

KeyBank National Association (as successor to KeyCorp Real Estate CapitalMarkets, Inc.), as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S.Bank National Association, as Trustee, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor.

 

 

 

Dated: March 20, 2020

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization ofthe depositor)
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00374

- CR

DAVID ALLEN RUSSELL

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 199th District Court of Collin County , Texas Trial Cause No. 199

- 81326

- 2012

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 29, 2015
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 289 

Designating the week beginning on October 18, 2015, as ‘‘National Chemistry 

Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2015 

Mr. COONS (for himself and Mr. TOOMEY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week beginning on October 18, 2015, as 

‘‘National Chemistry Week’’. 

Whereas chemistry is the science of basic units of matter 

and, consequently, plays a role in every aspect of human 

life; 

Whereas chemistry has broad applications, including food 

science, paints and coatings, water quality, energy, sustainability, medicine, and electronics; 

Whereas the science of chemistry is vital to improving the 

quality of human life and plays an important role in addressing critical global challenges; 

Whereas innovations in chemistry continue to spur economic 

growth and job creation and have applications for a wide 

range of industries; 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 289 ATS 

Whereas National Chemistry Week is part of a broader vision 

to improve human life through chemistry and to advance 

the chemistry enterprise and the practitioners of that enterprise for the benefit of communities and the environment; 

Whereas the purpose of National Chemistry Week is to reach 

the public with educational messages about chemistry in 

order to foster greater understanding of and appreciation 

for the applications and benefits of chemistry; 

Whereas National Chemistry Week strives to stimulate the 

interest of young people, including women and underrepresented groups, in enthusiastically studying science, 

technology, engineering, and mathematics and in pursuing science-related careers that lead to innovations and 

major scientific breakthroughs; 

Whereas National Chemistry Week highlights many of the everyday uses of chemistry, including in food, dyes and pigments, plastics, soaps and detergents, health products, 

and energy technologies; and 

Whereas students who participate in National Chemistry 

Week deserve recognition and support for their efforts: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week beginning on October 

3 18, 2015, as ‘‘National Chemistry Week’’; 

4 (2) supports the goals of and welcomes the par5 ticipants in the 28th annual National Chemistry 

6 Week; 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 289 ATS 

1 (3) recognizes the need to promote the fields of 

2 science, including chemistry, technology, engineering, 

3 and mathematics and encourage youth to pursue ca4 reers in these fields; and 

5 (4) commends the American Chemical Society 

6 and the partners of that society for organizing and 

7 convening events and activities surrounding National 

8 Chemistry Week each year. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Motion Granted; Order filed December 6, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00473-CV

____________

PRIORITY ARTIFICIAL LIFT SERVICES, LLC AND EP ENERGY E&P 

COMPANY, L.P., Appellants

V.

MICHAEL CHILES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-13626

ORDER

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to extend time to file its brief, thus 

altering the briefing schedule. The motion is GRANTED. We order:

• The opening brief of Priority Artificial Lift Services is due December 

30, 2022, with a word limit of 15,000;

• The opening brief of EP Energy E&P Company is due December 30, 

2022, with a word limit of 15,000;

• Chiles’ response to Priority Artificial Lift Services and cross-appellant 
brief is due January 30, 2023, with a word limit of 18,000;

• Chiles’ response to EP Energy E&P and cross-appellant brief is due 

January 30, 2023, with a word limit of 18,000;

• Priority Artificial Lift Services’ combined reply brief and response to 

cross-points is due February 21, 2023, with a word limit of 10,500;

• EP Energy E&P Company’s combined reply brief and response to 

cross-points is due February 21, 2023, with a word limit of 10,500;

• Chiles’ reply brief against Priority Artificial Lift Services is due 

March 13, 2023, with a word limit of 3,000; and

• Chiles’ reply brief against EP Energy E&P Company is due March 13, 

2023, with a word limit of 3,000.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Wilson.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2335 

To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands under 

the National Labor Relations Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2011 

Mrs. NOEM (for herself, Mr. KLINE, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. COLE, Mr. 

PAUL, and Mr. MCCLINTOCK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian 

lands under the National Labor Relations Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Labor Sov5 ereignty Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYER. 

7 Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

8 U.S.C. 152) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or any en10 terprise or institution owned and operated by an InVerDate Mar 15 2010 17:33 Jun 28, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2335.IH H2335

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2335 IH

1 dian tribe and located on its Indian lands,’’ after 

2 ‘‘subdivision thereof’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(15) The term ‘Indian tribe’ means any Indian 

5 tribe, band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group 

6 or community which is recognized as eligible for the 

7 special programs and services provided by the 

8 United States to Indians because of their status as 

9 Indians. 

10 ‘‘(16) The term ‘Indian’ means any individual 

11 who is a member of an Indian tribe. 

12 ‘‘(17) The term ‘Indian lands’ means— 

13 ‘‘(A) all lands within the limits of any In14 dian reservation; 

15 ‘‘(B) any lands title to which is either held 

16 in trust by the United States for the benefit of 

17 any Indian tribe or individual or held by any 

18 Indian tribe or individual subject to restriction 

19 by the United States against alienation; and 

20 ‘‘(C) any lands in the State of Oklahoma 

21 that are within the boundaries of a former res22 ervation (as defined by the Secretary of the In23 terior) of a federally recognized Indian tribe.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS